alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                                COHO ENERGY, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


Coho Resources, Limited, Alberta, Canada (100% owned subsidiary)

Coho Resources, Inc., Nevada (owned 45% by Coho Resources Limited and 55% by
Coho Energy, Inc.) 

Coho Marketing and Transportation, Inc., Nevada (100% subsidiary of Coho 
Resources, Inc.)

Coho Shell Company, Delaware (100% owned subsidiary)

Profile Petroleum Limited, Alberta, Canada (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources
Limited) 

Grayon Developments Limited, Alberta, Canada (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources 
Limited) 

Coho International Limited, Bahamas (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources Limited) 

Coho Anaguid, Inc., Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources, Inc.) 

Interstate Natural Gas Company, Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources, 
Inc.) 

Coho Exploration, Inc., Delaware (owned 100% by Interstate Natural Gas Company)

Coho Louisiana Production Company, Delaware (owned 100% by Interstate Natural 
Gas Company) 

Coho Fairbanks Gathering Company, Delaware (owned 100% by Interstate Natural 
Gas Company) 

Coho Louisiana Gathering Company, Delaware (owned 100% by Interstate Natural 
Gas Company) 

Coho Oil & Gas, Inc., Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources, Inc.)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.16


                           SHORT TERM PROMISSORY NOTE

US$9,000.00                                                     November 3, 2005

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Voyager One, Inc. promises to pay to the order of
Quest Manufacturing, Inc. at such place as the holder of this Note may from time
to time designate, the principal sum of Nine Thousand and 00/100 Dollars
(US$9,000.00) together with simple interest at the rate of six percent (6) per
annum on the principal balance.

         The note matures and becomes due anytime on demand. The amount of the
payment shall be an amount equal to the outstanding principal and unpaid
interest.

         All payments on account of the indebtedness evidenced by this note
shall be first applied to interest on the unpaid principal balance and the
remainder to principal.

         All parties to this note severally waive presentment for payment,
notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest.

         This note shall be effective November 3, 2005 regardless of when it is
signed.

"Payor"                                           "Payee"

Voyager One, Inc.                                 Quest Manufacturing, Inc.
859 West End Court                                2503 Spring Ridge Drive-Unit F
Suite I                                           Spring Grove, IL 60081
Vernon Hills, IL 60061                            Phone: (815) 675-2442
Phone: 847-984-6200                               Phone: (815) 675-3109
Fax: 847-984-6201

BY: /s/ Sebastien C. DuFort                       BY: /s/ John A.Lichter
    -----------------------                           --------------------------
         SIGNATURE & DATE                                      SIGNATURE & DATE
         SEBASTIEN C. DUFORT                                   JOHN A. LICHTER
         PRESIDENT                                             CEO
# C_2008327EN.01000902.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/9

---

Action brought on 17 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-401/08)

(2008/C 327/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima, A. Sipos, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (1), because the competent authorities in Austria failed to draw up an external emergency plan for all establishments to which Article 9 of the directive applies; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (1), because the competent authorities in Austria failed to draw up an external emergency plan for all establishments to which Article 9 of the directive applies;

1

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 11(1)(c) of Directive 96/82/EC requires Member States to ensure that, for all establishments to which Article 9 applies, the authorities designated for that purpose by the Member State draw up an external emergency plan for the measures to be taken outside the establishment. Those external emergency plans must not only contain information on on-site and off-site mitigatory action, but must also contain arrangements for providing the public with information relating to the accident and the behaviour which it should adopt. Moreover, the external emergency plans must for example also contain information for the emergency services of other Member States in the event of a major accident with possible transboundary consequences.

The objective of this application is to seek a declaration that by failing to draw up external emergency plans for all establishments to which Article 9 applies, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of Directive 96/82/EC.

---

(1)  OJ 1997 L 10, p. 13.

1

---
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Scott W. Scampini, Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to section Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge,
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





/s/  Scott
                W. ScampiniScott
                W. Scampini*(Principal
                Financial Officer)*





November
      12, 2008
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5478-S5479]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RECOGNIZING KELLY CURUCHET

 Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I wish to take the opportunity to 
express my appreciation to Kelly Curuchet for her hard work as an 
intern for the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee. I recognize her 
efforts and contributions to my office.
  Kelly is a native of Kaycee, WY, and a graduate of Kaycee High 
School. She recently graduated from the University of Wyoming, where 
she majored in business administration and minored

[[Page S5479]]

in professional writing. She has demonstrated a strong work ethic, 
which has made her an invaluable asset to the U.S. Senate Republican 
Policy Committee. The quality of her work is reflected in her great 
efforts over the last several months.
  I want to thank Kelly for the dedication she has shown while working 
for me and my staff. It was a pleasure to have her as part of our team. 
I know she will have continued success with all of her future 
endeavors. I wish her all my best on her next journey.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4405 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4558 Broadway in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Stanley Michaels 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. COLLINS of New 

York, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FASO, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. KATKO, Mr. KING of New York, 

Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MENG, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

REED, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. 

TONKO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. STEFANIK, and 

Ms. TENNEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stanley Michaels Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STANLEY MICHAELS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4558 Broadway in New York, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4405 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stanley 

2 Michaels Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stanley Michaels Post 

7 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4392 

To provide that the provision of the Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient 

Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems 

and Quality Reporting Programs final regulation relating to changes 

in the payment amount for certain drugs and biologicals purchased 

under the 340B drug discount program shall have no force or effect, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Ohio, Mr. KUSTOFF of Tennessee, Mr. COURTNEY, and Ms. CASTOR of 

Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that the provision of the Medicare Program: 

Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs final regulation relating to changes 

in the payment amount for certain drugs and biologicals 

purchased under the 340B drug discount program shall 

have no force or effect, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4392 IH

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MEDICARE HOSPITAL 

2 OUTPATIENT PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN 

3 DRUGS; OPPS BUDGET NEUTRALITY ADJUST4 MENT. 

5 (a) PREVENTING IMPLEMENTATION OF MEDICARE

6 HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT PAYMENT CHANGES FOR HOS7 PITALS THAT PURCHASE DRUGS UNDER 340B DRUG

8 DISCOUNT PROGRAM.—Beginning on the date of the en9 actment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human 

10 Services shall not take any action to implement, admin11 ister, or enforce the provision of the final regulation titled 

12 the Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective 

13 Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Sys14 tems and Quality Reporting Programs published on No15 vember 13, 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 52356 et seq.), that would 

16 change the payment amount under the Prospective Pay17 ment System for Hospital Outpatient Department Serv18 ices under section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act (42 

19 U.S.C. 1395l(t)) for separately payable, nonpass-through 

20 drugs and biologicals purchased under the drug discount 

21 program under section 340B of the Public Health Service 

22 Act (42 U.S.C. 256b). The payment amount under such 

23 payment system under such section 1833(t) for such a 

24 drug or biological shall be determined through the same 

25 methodology as if such final regulation did not apply. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4392 IH

1 (b) OPPS BUDGET NEUTRALITY ADJUSTMENT.— 

2 The first sentence of section 1833(t)(9)(B) of the Social 

3 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(9)(B)) is amended by 

4 striking ‘‘part’’ each place such term appears and insert5 ing ‘‘subsection’’ each such place. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 119 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1448]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF VINTAGE HALL AND ST. HELENA HIGH 
                    SCHOOL IN ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE THOMPSON

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, August 7, 2012

  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in celebration 
and praise of St. Helena High School, my alma mater and one of the 
oldest public education facilities in northern California, which 
celebrates its 100th anniversary this year.
  Founded in June of 1912, upon the completion of what is now known as 
Vintage Hall, St. Helena Union High School represents the culmination 
of a long-standing effort to unify the various school districts of the 
St. Helena area, including those of Pope Valley, Conn Valley and 
Angwin. Early efforts to provide free, public education, beginning in 
the 1890s, combined the regions under a single governing board, but 
classes had to be held in the local Presbyterian Church from 1895 until 
completion of the building nearly 20 years later.
  Today, St. Helena High School's facilities have expanded far beyond 
Vintage Hall to accommodate the demands of the community's growing 
student population. And this year, the school became home to a new 
$13.5 million vocational education complex, complete with a state-of-
the-art culinary facility, animal barn, agricultural mechanics workshop 
and all of the amenities of 21th century classrooms. With these 
facilities in place, students will benefit from a top-flight vocational 
training program, essential to the development of a skilled work force 
and subsequent community improvements.
  Students at St. Helena High School will now be afforded the unique 
opportunity to prepare for careers in the areas of hospitality, 
tourism, the culinary arts, floral design, agricultural husbandry, and 
mechanics, continuing the historic tradition that St. Helena High 
School started so many years ago.
  Mr. Speaker, it is appropriate at this time that we congratulate the 
students, educators and administrators of St. Helena High School, past 
and present. The centennial celebration in St. Helena is one that is 
well-deserved. We extend our best wishes to the school and community 
for many more years of outstanding public education and the merits that 
come with.
```
**Exhibit 10.20**

 

**Exhibit A**

 

**FIFTH AMENDMENT**

**OFTHE**

**SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. NON-QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN**

**(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1999)**

 

**WHEREAS**, Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintainsthe Sky Financial Group, Inc. Non-Qualified Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) for a select group of its management and highly compensated employees; 

 

**WHEREAS**, the Company has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky Financial Group, Inc.Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, pursuant to the power reserved to the Committee by Section 8.1 of thePlan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the undersigned by resolution of the Committee, the Plan, as previously amended, be and is hereby amended further, in the following particulars: 

 

1. By substituting “2.1” for “3.1” and“2.2” for “3.2” in the first sentence of Section 2.3 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 1999. ****

 

2. By deleting the last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 2.3 of the Plan, effective as of November 13, 2002. 

 

3. By adding the following sentence to Section 6.2 of thePlan, immediately after the second sentence thereof, effective as of July 1, 2002: 

 

“A Participant may also make a one-time election on or after his or her Employment Termination to change the manner in which his or her Account will be distributed in accordance with theprocedures established by the Committee.” 

 

*        *        * 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned Committee member has executed this Plan amendment on behalf of the Committee, this 13th day of November, 2002. 

 

**SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE**

By:
 
 
  
A Member of the Committee

 

-2-
SCPW-22-0000283
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

IN RE KEAKA MARTIN, Petitioner

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 3CPN-21-0000006)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Keaka Martin’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on April 19, 2022, and the record, petitioner fails to demonstrate he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief and that he lacks alternative means to seek relief. An extraordinary writ is thus not warranted. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such a writ is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, cure a mere legal Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-22-0000283 26-APR-2022 01:26 PM Dkt. 5 ODDPerror, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate

procedures). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. It is further ordered that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 26, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
EXHIBIT 10.51


 


BUSINESS SUBLEASE
 


This
agreement is signed and dated February 11, 2005.


 


Starting
on March 1, 2005, Power Efficiency Corporation, a Delaware corporation
headquartered at 3900 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, NV, will rent office and lab
space at 7 Mayflower Place, Floral Park, New York 11001.


 


Power
Efficiency Corporation will conduct laboratory experiments related to AC
induction motors and conduct basic business functions at the facility.


 


The
total rent per month for the use of the facility is $1,000.00 per month, due on
the first day of each month. The $1,000.00 represents all rental payment
necessary for the facilities, including use of internet access, telephones, and
all utilities. In addition to the rent, Power Efficiency Corporation will pay
Famair, Inc. a $1,000.00 deposit. This deposit is to be refunded after Power
Efficiency Corp after Power Efficiency Corporation has moved out of the
facility and paid all due rents.


 


The
length of this agreement is open and will remain in effect on a month-to-month
basis as long as each party agrees to the continuance of the agreement. If
either party wished to terminate the agreement, they must notify, in writing,
the other party of their intention to terminate the agreement. The termination
of the agreement will take place 30 days after the written notification.


 


	
  Agreed
  and Accepted:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Famair,
  Inc.

  	
  Power
  Efficiency Corp.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Imtiaz Mughal

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  John Lackland
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5450]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          REMOVAL OF NAME OF MEMBER AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 3009

  Mr. ROSS of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to remove 
my name as cosponsor of H.R. 3009.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Huelskamp). Is there objection to the 
request of the gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
# Elliott - Appalachian Regional Commission

- FIVCO Area Development District Executive Director Kelly T. Ward Email &#x6b;&#101;&#108;l&#x79;&#x40;&#102;i&#x76;&#x63;&#111;&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post FIVCO Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.