alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009141EN.01002201.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/22

---

Appeal brought on 3 June 2008 by Mr Ammayappan Ayyanarsamy against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 April 2008 in Case T-412/07 Ammayappan Ayyanarsamy v Commission of the European Communities and the Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-251/08 P)

2009/C 141/38

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ammayappan Ayyanarsamy (represented by: H. Kotzur, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities, Federal Republic of Germany

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 17 March 2009 the Court (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Mr Ayyanarsamy to bear his own costs.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1375]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               IN HONOR OF THE HITCHCOCK CENTER FOR WOMEN

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of the Hitchcock 
Center for Women, HCFW, for 30 years of dedicated service to thousands 
of women and their families in Cleveland, OH.
   The mission of the Hitchcock Center is to holistically empower women 
to achieve and maintain productive, chemical-free lives. The Hitchcock 
Center is ``the place where healing begins'' for women who are in need 
of help.
   The founder of the Hitchcock Center is Jayne Mazzerella, who 
realized that women recover differently from chemical substances than 
men. She founded Merrick Hall, a 4-bed treatment program for female 
alcoholics, which led to the beginnings of the Hitchcock Center.
   The Hitchcock Center is now the largest agency of its kind in the 
Greater Cleveland area. To date, it has provided services to 
approximately 13,000 women and their families. The Hitchcock Center 
recently announced its planned expansion of the Traditional Housing and 
Recovery Management services, which strives to return families back 
into the community. They eventually seek to expand into even more 
communities.
   Today, there are 53 women who work for the Hitchcock Center. There 
are also many alumnae of the program who return to volunteer for the 
center through the HCFW Alumnae Council. Together, they have proven 
success in helping women to grow and recover so they can go back to 
their families and homes as whole and healed persons.
   Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the HCFW of 
Cleveland, OH, for all of their dedication and service to the 
community.

                          ____________________
```
From:Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US 

To:"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc:RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US, Teresa 

 Clemons/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date:11/30/2011 10:52 AM 

Subject:EO 12866 NESHAP Boiler Major Source Reconsideration 

 2060_AR13 Proposal 20111129-Redline.doc 

Cortney, 

Here are the Major Source Boiler preamble and rule clean and redline 

versions incorporating interagency comments. 

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP Boiler Major Source Reconsideration 

2060_AR13 Proposal 20111129-Redline.doc) 

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP Boiler Major Source Reconsideration 

2060_AR13 Proposal 20111129-Clean.doc) 

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. 

Thanks! 

Brian 

Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leon Johnson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered January 9, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s application to suppress the physical evidence found on his person was properly denied for reasons stated by Justice Chetta in his memorandum decision dated August 15, 1989 *(see, People v Perry,*133 AD2d 380, 381-382, *affd*71 NY2d 871; *cf., People v Durant,*175 AD2d 176). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2009 – Complejo Agricola v Commission**

**(Case C‐415/08 P)**

Appeal – Protection of habitats – List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region – Commission decision – Action for annulment brought by natural or legal persons – Admissibility – Appeal clearly unfounded

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Absolute bar to proceeding
(Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see para. 21)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para.,
EC) (see paras 26, 28-30)*

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 14 July 2008 in Case T-345/06 | Complejo Agrícola | v | Commission | , in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the application for partial annulment of Article 1 of Annex 1 of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Acebuchales de la Campiña sur de Cádiz’, which includes a farm belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region. |

**Operative part:**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Complejo Agrícola SA is ordered to bear its own costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs. |
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Colin Binny President (Chief
Executive Officer) and Francis Foong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                 /s/ Colin Binny
                                 -----------------------
                                 President
                                 August 11, 2006


                                 /s/ Francis Foong
                                 -----------------------
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 August 11, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5894]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  AMENDING THE YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO AND ALABAMA AND COUSHATTA INDIAN 
                    TRIBES OF TEXAS RESTORATION ACT

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate now 
proceed to the consideration of Calendar No. 480, H.R. 1560.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 1560) to amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and 
     Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act 
     to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribe to determine blood 
     quantum requirement for membership in that tribe.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be 
read a third time and passed, the motion to reconsider be made and laid 
upon the table, there be no intervening action or debate, and that any 
statements related to this measure be printed in the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The bill (H.R. 1560) was ordered to a third reading, was read the 
third time, and passed.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 437 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 437

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 
    existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security 
   Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding for 
   enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass 
                       prophylaxis capabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Preparedness Allowable Use 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS FOR ENHANCING 
              MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, AND MASS 
              PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES.

    Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (14) 
                as paragraphs (11) through (15), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following 
                new paragraph (10):
            ``(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge 
        capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, including the 
        development and maintenance of an initial pharmaceutical 
        stockpile, including medical kits, and diagnostics sufficient 
        to protect first responders, their families, immediate victims, 
        and vulnerable populations from a chemical or biological 
        event;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ``subsection 
        (a)(10)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)(11)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0277

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

BRANDY J. PERSOMA,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

TYLER S. PERSOMA,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Brandy J. Persoma, to all counsel of 

record, and to the Honorable Randal I. Spaulding, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 3 2021

03/03/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0277
##### 



Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF
POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
 Jurisdiction ofIncorporation orName of Entity
    
    Formation101070338 Saskatchewan Ltd.
    
    Saskatchewan175360 Canada Inc.
    
    Canada609430 Saskatchewan Ltd.
    
    Saskatchewan628550 Saskatchewan Ltd.
    
    SaskatchewanAA Sulfuric Corporation
    
    LouisianaAugusta Service Company, Inc.
    
    DelawareCanpotex Bulk Terminals Limited
    
    CanadaChilkap Resources Ltd.
    
    YukonInversiones El Boldo Limitada
    
    ChileInversiones El Roble Limitada
    
    ChileInversiones El Sauce Limitada
    
    ChileInversiones PCS Chile S.A.
    
    ChileInversiones RAC Chile Limitada
    
    ChileMinera Saskatchewan Limitada
    
    ChilePCS Administration (USA), Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS (Barbados) Holdings SRL
    
    BarbadosPCS (Barbados) Investment Company Ltd.
    
    BarbadosPCS (Barbados) Shipping Ltd.
    
    BarbadosPCS Cassidy Lake Company
    
    OntarioPCS Cassidy Lake Limited
    
    CanadaPCS Chesapeake LLC
    
    DelawarePCS Chile I LLC
    
    DelawarePCS Chile II LLC
    
    DelawarePCS Fosfatos do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilPCS Hungary Holding Limited Liability Company
    
    HungaryPCS Industrial Products Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS Joint Venture, Ltd.
    
    FloridaPCS Jordan LLC
    
    DelawarePCS L.P. Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS LP LLC 2
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Ammonia Terminal Corporation I
    
    TexasPCS Nitrogen Ammonia Terminal Corporation II
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Delaware LLC
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Fertilizer Limited
    
    TrinidadPCS Nitrogen Fertilizer Operations, Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen, Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen LCD Corporation
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Limited
    
    TrinidadPCS Nitrogen Ohio, L.P.
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Payroll Corporation
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Trinidad Corporation
    
    DelawarePCS Nitrogen Trinidad Limited
    
    TrinidadPCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS Purified Phosphates
    
    VirginiaPCS Sales (Canada) Inc.
    
    Saskatchewan




---



##### 



Jurisdiction ofIncorporation orName of Entity
    
    FormationPCS Sales (Indiana), Inc.
    
    IndianaPCS Sales (Iowa), Inc.
    
    IowaPCS Sales (USA), Inc.
    
    DelawarePCS USA LLC
    
    DelawarePhosphate Holding Company, Inc.
    
    DelawarePotash Corporation of Saskatchewan (Florida) Inc.
    
    FloridaPotash Corporation of Saskatchewan Transport Limited
    
    SaskatchewanPotashCorp Finance (Barbados) Limited
    
    BarbadosPotash Holding Company, Inc.
    
    DelawareRAC Investments Ltd.
    
    CaymanTexasgulf Aircraft Inc.
    
    DelawareTG Corporation
    
    DelawareWhite Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc.
    
    Delaware
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4484 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 

imposition of a nondisclosure agreement as a condition of the payment 

of any award or settlement in connection with a violation of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2017 

Mr. STEWART (for himself and Ms. BONAMICI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to 

prohibit the imposition of a nondisclosure agreement as 

a condition of the payment of any award or settlement 

in connection with a violation of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Victims’ Voice and 

5 Transparency Act’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4484 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPOSITION OF NONDISCLOSURE 

2 AGREEMENT AS CONDITION OF AWARD OR 

3 SETTLEMENT UNDER CONGRESSIONAL AC4 COUNTABILITY ACT OF 1995. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 401 of the Congressional 

6 Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1401) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Except as otherwise provided’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘(a) PROCEDURES AVAILABLE.—Ex9 cept as otherwise provided’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section: 

12 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITING IMPOSITION OF NONDISCLOSURE

13 AGREEMENTS.—A nondisclosure agreement may not be 

14 imposed on any party as a condition of the payment of 

15 any award or settlement in connection with a violation of 

16 part A of title II.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to awards and set19 tlements paid in connection with the Congressional Ac20 countability Act of 1995 on or after the date of the enact21 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John R. Coghlan, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Temporary
Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 11, 2005


/s/ John R. Coghlan
-------------------------------------
John R. Coghlan
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2008223EN.01003803.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/38

---

Action brought on 16 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-326/08)

(2008/C 223/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: W. Wils and B. Kotschy, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/29/EC (1), or, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law, in particular under Article 19 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/29/EC (1), or, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law, in particular under Article 19 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementing the Directive expired on 12 June 2007.

---

(1)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’); OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.

1

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0059. DANIELLE TERRELL v. FYR SFR BORROWER, LLC.

In this dispossessory proceeding, the state court granted FYR SFR Borrower,

LLC a writ of possession against Danielle Terrell on August 22, 2024, after Terrell

failed to pay the rent due in the amount of $7,781.40. On September 12, 2024, Terrell

filed an application for discretionary review to challenge the trial court’sruling. We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

No discretionary application is required in this case.Afinal judgment is directly

appealable under OCGA§ 5-6-34 (a) (1), and this action does not appear to fall within

one of the categories of cases for which a discretionary application is required to seek

appellate reviewunder OCGA§ 5-6-35 (a). Ordinarily, under OCGA§ 5-6-35 (j), this

Court will grant a timely application for discretionary reviewifthe lower court’s order

is subject to direct appeal. See City of Rincon v. Couch, 272 Ga. App. 411, 412 (612

SE2d 596) (2005).However, as this case is a dispossessory proceeding, OCGA§ 44-7-

56 governs the appeal procedure. OCGA § 44-7-56 (b) (1) provides that “[a] copy of

the petition for review filed in the reviewing superior or state court or the notice of

appeal shall be filedwith the clerk ofthe trial court within seven days after the date the

judgment was entered in the trial court.” See also Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239

Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999).

Here, Terrell filed her application 21 days after the trial court’s order. Because

OCGA § 44-7-56 (b) (1) required Terrell to file a notice of appeal within seven days, 

October 04, 2024
this filing is untimely, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/04/2024
#### Patrick J. SAHLI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-17548.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Patrick J. Sahli, Taft, CA, pro se.

Patrick Hanly, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Patrick J. Sahli appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction by guilty plea on multiple counts of mail fraud. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*619Sahli contends that the district court erred by imposing a sentence based on facts either contested by him or found by a preponderance of the evidence, contrary to *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). This contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Cruz,*423 F.3d 1119, 1119-20 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that *“Booker*does not apply retroactively to convictions that became final prior to its publication”) and *Schardt v. Payne,*414 F.3d 1025, 1036 (9th Cir.2005) (concluding that *Blakely*does not apply retroactively to cases on § 2254 habeas review).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.