alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012032EN.01004301.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/43

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 December 2011 — Stols v Council

(Case F-51/08 RENV) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Promotion - 2007 promotion exercise - Consideration of comparative merits - Manifest error of assessment - No manifest error - Grounds for the decision - Supererogatory ground - Inoperative plea)

2012/C 32/84

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Willem Stols (Halsteren, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials promoted to grade AST 11 for the 2007 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action brought by Mr Stols; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action brought by Mr Stols;

| 2. | Orders Mr Stols to bear his own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union in Case F-51/08. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Stols to bear his own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union in Case F-51/08.

| 3. | Orders Mr Stols and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs in Case T-175/09 and in the present case. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Stols and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs in Case T-175/09 and in the present case.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 19.7.2008, p. 34.

1

---
Order entered February 12, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 00705 - CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V. BRIAN LONCAR, SUE LO NCAR, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 09 - 06753 - C



### O RDER Appellees’ January 30, 2014 unopposed motion for filing a motion for rehearing is GRANTED , and the time is extended until February 18, 2014.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
United States 

Department of

Agriculture

Marketing and

Regulatory

Programs

Animal and 

Plant Health

Inspection

Service

4700 River Road

Riverdale, MD 20737

Safeguarding American Agriculture

APHIS is an agency of USDA’s Marketing and Regulatory Programs

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

August 31, 2018

Mr. Adam Carlesco, Staff Counsel

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER)

962 Wayne Avenue, Suite 610

Silver Spring, MD 20910

Dear Mr. Carlesco:

This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter dated August 24, 2018, and which we received 

on August 24, 2018 via email. On behalf of the Public Employees for Environmental 

Responsibility (PEER), you have submitted a Request for Reconsideration to your original 

Complaint About Information Quality and the APHIS response. The PEER desires APHIS to 

retract the University of California, Coop. Ext. Serv. Bulletin 1872 publication, Connolly, G.E. 

and W.M. Longhurst, 1975, The Effects of Control on Coyote Populations: A simulation Model 

(“Connolly and Longhurst”).

We are in the process of reviewing your Request for Reconsideration. In accordance with the 

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidelines, we will respond to your request 

for reconsideration within 60 calendar days of receipt. If the request requires more than 60 

calendar days to resolve, we will inform you that that more time is required. 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Connie Williams

Chief, Planning, Evaluation and Decision Support

Policy and Program Development

USDA, APHIS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5481]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   MOUNTAIN STATE SECURITY FELLOWSHIP

 Mr. MANCHIN. Mr. President, I rise today to recognize the 
thousands of West Virginians who have chosen to serve this great Nation 
as members of our military. West Virginia is one of the most patriotic 
States in the Nation, and we are humbled by the sacrifice of 39 brave 
West Virginians who gave their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  Throughout the generations, thousands of brave men and women gave us 
our freedom; they deserve the best we can give them in return.
  In recognition of these values and the service of all West 
Virginians, today I am launching the Mountain State National Security 
Fellowship.
  While working on Capitol Hill or in my State offices, selected 
fellows will use the skills and experience gained while serving in our 
armed services to assist my office with military and veterans-related 
issues. They will also personally represent the West Virginia veteran 
community and embody the values of all who served, including those who 
made the ultimate sacrifice for their country.
  This is our next generation of leaders, and this fellowship will help 
encourage them to develop their interest in public service. Fellows 
will gain a firsthand understanding of how we help our constituents by 
staying connected to their lives and serving their needs. Our office 
will benefit from a servicemember's perspective on the problems we are 
trying to solve.
  This fellowship is a small but important step in a much larger 
national problem. Veterans face the highest unemployment levels of 
almost any group of people in our economy, and that is wrong. We need 
to do more to match our veterans with available jobs in their 
communities.
  As cofounder of the Congressional Veterans Jobs Caucus, I have joined 
with many colleagues from both parties to focus on the problem of 
veterans' unemployment. As we draw down from the Middle East, veterans 
will be returning to our communities and trying to build new lives with 
their families, and we should do everything we can to put their 
incredible skills to good use.
  In my own office, we employ four veterans, and they are the most 
dedicated, trained, committed kind of employees imaginable. I am so 
appreciative to have that quality of a workforce in my office.
  As a nation, we fly the flag and we proudly display yellow ribbons, 
but if you really want to say thank you to someone who was willing to 
sacrifice and give their all, you hire a veteran. They are well 
trained, disciplined, and ready to go to work.
  That is the drive behind our jobs caucus, our ``I Hire Veterans'' 
project, and this fellowship program. It is easy to talk the talk, but 
you have to walk the walk, and this fellowship is one way for us to do 
so.
  I want to say thank you to all West Virginia veterans and their 
families and that it will be an honor to work with you as Mountain 
State National Security Fellows.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 139 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-111, CP2024-116.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28054 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2019025EN.01006102.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/61

---

Action brought on 26 November 2018 — Aldi v EUIPO — Titlbach (ALTISPORT)

(Case T-697/18)

(2019/C 25/80)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and M. Minkner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aleš Titlbach (Meziboří, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ALTISPORT — International registration designating the European Union No 1 226 617

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2018 in Case R 2683/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,022-02

IN RE ARTIE JOSEPH RILEY JR., Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. C-372-W012168-1087825 IN THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on

or about July 18, 2022, in Tarrant County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this

Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Tarrant County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Tarrant County, or forward

a copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date the State

received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); TEX.

R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this
2

order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Filed: SEPTEMBER 21, 2022

Do not publish
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation 

Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.) 

Written CommenProvidedDid they submit to 

6/9/10 telephone correspondence 

 Mollie Averyt, ICF International, 

maveryt@icfi.com

202-862-1569 on behalf of EPA under Contract EPW-07-068, Task Order 68 

Phil Bolin, Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, Inc. (MEPPI) 724-778-5235 

Topic: Under Subpart SS, there is a concern regarding the disbursement input of the mass balance approach. Typically manufacturers would enter the quantity of gas that was disbursed from the cylinder and into the breaker. However, if there was an emission during the transfer of the gas, it would be counted as a disbursement rather than an emission – thereby underestimating emissions. EPA is examining a variety of ways to accurately determine the amount of SF6 (or PFC) filled into 

new equipment before that equipment is shipped out to customers including either engineering methods on the transfer of the gas or very precise measurement of the equipment’s nameplate capacity. Response: MEPPI is moving toward having their production department putting the weight of SF6 on the shipping papers. 

For project work at substations, they still need to develop a detailed procedure They do not have measurements on accurate shipping charge. They weigh the bottle before and weigh it after filling. They have not looked into the hose situation entirely yet but said that because they are self sealing hoses, the gas should stay in the hoses. Acknowledged that there is a little “puff” during connect/disconnect, something their company has not measured yet. How much of a puff is dependent on pressure. When asked how to measure it, he said they could put a bag around it and see how much comes out. If the loss is large, they could improve the fitting – in the long run. Explained that attaching isn’t so much a problem as disconnecting it. 

No
# C_2011331EN.01001702.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional v OHIM — Proton Motor Fuel Cell (PM PROTON MOTOR)

(Case T-581/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark PM PROTON MOTOR - Earlier national, Benelux and Community word and figurative marks PROTON - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Lack of similarity between the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2011/C 331/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd (Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia) (represented by: J. Blind, C. Kleiner and S. Ziegler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Proton Motor Fuel Cell GmbH (Puchheim, Germany) (represented by: C. Sedlmeir, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 October 2008 (Case R 1675/2007-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd and Proton Motor Fuel Cell GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
# C_2008116EN.01001801.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/18

---

Action brought on 19 mars 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-122/08)

(2008/C 116/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: Mr M. Wilderspin, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 (1) on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 (1) on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 30 April 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 158, p. 77.

1

---
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2008 – Lipor v Commission**

**(Case T-26/07)**

Action for annulment – Cohesion Fund – Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 – Reduction of financial assistance – No direct concern – Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Council Regulation No 1164/94, Art. 12(1)(h);
Commission Regulation No 1831/94, Arts 5(2) and 7) (see paras 39-54)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for annulment of decision C(2006) 5008 of the Commission of 17 October 2006 concerning the reduction of the Cohesion Fund as regards certain projects relating to the factory for the incineration of solid urban waste of household origin in the Region of Porto. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Serviço Intermunicipalizado de Gestão de Resíduos do Grande Porto (Lipor) to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1351]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING ALEXANDRE LOPES

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. FREDERICA S. WILSON

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Ms. WILSON of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor Alexandre Lopes, 
for being selected as the Macy's--Florida Department of Education, 2013 
Teacher of the Year. Mr. Lopes embodies the merit and dedication 
required to lead students in today's challenging academic environment. 
He serves at Carol City Elementary School as a teacher in the Learning 
Experience Alternative Program. As an educator Mr. Lopes has dedicated 
his career to special needs students with communication issues. The 
LEAP program has allowed Mr. Lopes to express his creativity and 
compassion for teaching by using music and dance to progress the 
student's communication skills. His courage, vision and passion are 
contributing factors behind his emergence as a pioneer in education, 
community leader, and role model amongst his peers. As a former 
educator I am pleased to honor Mr. Lopes, and wish him the best of luck 
as he moves into the national competition.

                          ____________________
```
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 91 ) ll-K-(B)-7 9 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:51 AM Sheet 91 of 325P. 2



# A-83-2 7

II-K-(B)-7 9
DISCUSSIO N

O F DIFFERENC E I

N COS T ALGORITHM S BETWEE N IFCA M AND RADIA

N FO RBOILE RCAPITA L COST S AND WORKSHIF T ASSUMPTIONS . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EE

A t o Dr . A

Wehe , EPA:SASD . Septembe r 11 , 1981 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-7 9
V 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4371 

For the relief of Melecio Andazola-Morales. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. PERLMUTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Melecio Andazola-Morales. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MELECIO 

4 ANDAZOLA-MORALES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Melecio Andazola-Morales shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4371 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Melecio Andazola2 Morales enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Melecio Andazola-Morales, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4371 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Melecio Andazola-Morales 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS