alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1118** 

YVONNE HICKMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MICHAEL PUGLISE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 03577

- CCB )

Submitted : April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Yvonne Hickman , Appellant Pro Se

. Michael Puglise , Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Yvonne Hickman appeals the district court ’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the reco rd and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Hickman v. Puglise , No. 1:12

- cv - 03577

- CCB (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequa tely presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2008158EN.01002502.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/25

---

Action brought on 29 February 2008 — Simões dos Santos v OHIM

(Case F-27/08)

(2008/C 158/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Manuel Simões dos Santos (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: A. Creus Carreras, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of several decisions of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market in so far as they do not correctly enforce the judgment in Case T-435/04, not granting the applicant the balance of points whose elimination was annulled by the Court of First Instance, and for payment of default interest on the amount corresponding to the difference in salary which the applicant should have received.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 3 December 2007 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant on 8 August 2007, and the decision No PERS-01-07 relating to the award of promotion points under the 2003 promotion procedure, the decision ADM-07-17 interpreting decision ADM-03-35 relating to the career and promotion of officials and members of the temporary staff and the letter of 15 June 2007, entitled, ‘Definitive awarding of 2007 promotion points adopted by the Appointing Authority’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 3 December 2007 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant on 8 August 2007, and the decision No PERS-01-07 relating to the award of promotion points under the 2003 promotion procedure, the decision ADM-07-17 interpreting decision ADM-03-35 relating to the career and promotion of officials and members of the temporary staff and the letter of 15 June 2007, entitled, ‘Definitive awarding of 2007 promotion points adopted by the Appointing Authority’;

| — | order OHIM to pay the applicant the default interest on the amount corresponding to the difference in salary which he should have received had the elimination of the balance of his promotion points not occurred, calculated at a rate fixed by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the applicant the default interest on the amount corresponding to the difference in salary which he should have received had the elimination of the balance of his promotion points not occurred, calculated at a rate fixed by the Court;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

---
# Distressed Counties - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Strategies for Economic Improvement in Appalachia’s Distressed Rural Counties This report provides an understanding of the challenges confronting economic and community development efforts in rural Appalachian communities and explains the ways local governments, agencies, and community organizations plan and respond to challengingThe post Strategies for Economic Improvement in Appalachia&#8217;s Distressed Rural Counties appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Developing and Assessing Potential Forward-Looking Distress Indicators for the Appalachian Region This ARC-commissioned study evaluated indicators used to classify counties as economically distressed, with the goal of improving the ability to target resources effectively to counties facing barriers to economic progress.The post Developing and Assessing Potential Forward-Looking Distress Indicators for the Appalachian Region appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- An Assessment of Alternative Measures for Determining Economically Distressed Counties and Areas in the Appalachian Region This report responds to a proactive effort by the ARC to explore new avenues for assessing wellbeing. Despite well-recognized advances, chronic socioeconomic distress persists in various pockets in the region while other areas face instability.The post An Assessment of Alternative Measures for Determining Economically Distressed Counties and Areas in the Appalachian Region appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Trends in National and Regional Economic Distress: 1960-2000 This report analyzes recent demographic data to examine the factors explaining the graduation of distressed counties and the persistence of distress in Appalachia and other regions of the U.S.The post Trends in National and Regional Economic Distress: 1960-2000 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Labor Market Performance, Poverty, and Income Inequality in Appalachia This study examines the performance of the Appalachian economy and how residents of Appalachia fared between 1990 and 2000.The post Labor Market Performance, Poverty, and Income Inequality in Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Progress and Challenges in Reducing Economic Distress in Appalachia: An Analysis of National and Regional Trends Since 1960 This report analyzes changes in the number of distressed counties in Appalachia and the entire United States for the census years 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990.The post Progress and Challenges in Reducing Economic Distress in Appalachia: An Analysis of National and Regional Trends Since 1960 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Building on Past Experiences: Creating a New Future for Distressed Counties This report studies the development experience of the distressed counties with the aim of identifying the lessons that might be learned from those counties that have changed socioeconomic status.The post Building on Past Experiences: Creating a New Future for Distressed Counties appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2021

No. 04-21-00036-CR

EX PARTE NOEL PARKS

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-19-0000092

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 3, 2021, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, 

stating that the reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to 

request the record in writing. We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written 

proof to this court by May 14, 2021 that the appellant has requested the court 

reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate the 

portions of the proceedings and the exhibits to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(b)(1). The reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty days after the 

date appellant’s written proof is filed with this court. If appellant fails to request 

the record is writing, the court will consider only those issues or points raised in 

appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Lu Yiping, certify that this annual report on Form 20-F of Sinopec Shanghai
Petrochemical Company Limited fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
Company Limited.

     Date: June 26, 2003                     /s/ Lu Yiping
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Lu Yiping, Chairman

NOTICE:

This certification is furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and will be retained
by Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

37 38 39 40



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
# C_2008171EN.01002902.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/29

---

Action brought on 23 May 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-224/08)

(2008/C 171/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Huvelin, agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (1) and, in any event, by not having informed the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (1) and, in any event, by not having informed the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2006/100/EC expired on the date of accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, namely 1 January 2007. At the date of bringing this action, the defendant had not taken the measures necessary to transpose completely the directive, in particular in respect of the medical professions, lawyers and architects.

---

(1)  OJ L 363, p. 141.

1

---
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4326 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 200 West North Street in Normal, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Sgt. Josh Rodgers Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4326 EH

1 SECTION 1. SGT. JOSH RODGERS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 200 West North Street in Nor4 mal, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. 

5 Josh Rodgers Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Josh Rodgers 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4326 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Normal, Illinois, as the ‘‘Sgt. Josh Rodgers Post al Service located at 200 West North Street in
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Bogen Communications International, Inc.:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-21245, 333-52774, and 333-52776) on Forms S-8, and (No. 333-76993) on Form S-3 of Bogen
Communications International, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bogen Communications International, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Bogen Communications
International, Inc. Our report refers to the Company's adoption of Statements of Accounting Standards No. 141 "Business Combinations" and No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets" as of January 1, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLPShort Hills, New Jersey
March 6, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### Craig M. Schmeer, Appellant, v County of Monroe et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. John P. Bell & Sons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defendants dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) because absolute liability under that section may be imposed only upon a showing that the injured worker fell from an elevated work surface or was struck by an object falling from a elevated work surface. Neither occurred here *(see, Staples v Town of Amherst,*146 AD2d 292, 293; *Siragusa v State of New York,*117 AD2d 986, *lv denied*68 NY2d 602).

Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action because, contrary to plaintiff’s argument, a violation of certain regulations or administrative rules adopted pursuant to the authorization of Labor Law § 241 (6), even if admitted by defendants, does not establish negligence as a matter of law but is "merely some evidence to *634be considered on the question of a defendant’s negligence and lacks the force and effect of a substantive legislative enactment” *(Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts,*65 NY2d 513, 522; *see also, Long v Forest-Fehlhaber,*55 NY2d 154, 160-161). Liability under Labor Law § 241 (6) is not self-executing but "require[s] reference to outside sources to determine the standard by which a defendant’s conduct must be measured” *(Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, supra,*at 523). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
February 12, 2015

Scott Faulk U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis, X-53 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 . ! Mayorand CouncilMembers

EfrainSilva JasonJackson SedaliaSanders AlexCardenas CherylViegas-Walker



### RE: Essential Air Service Eligibility - Imperial County Airport (California)
Dear Mr. Faulk:
First ofall, I would like to take this opportunityto express our gratitudeto the U.S. DepartmentofTransportation for notterminating the Essential Air Service (''EAS") Program at the Imperial County Airport (''IPL"). Back in April 2014, our community was notified that IPL was one of 13 airports that may lose its EAS eligibility because IPL served fewer than ten passengers per day during theyear-ending December 31, 2013. Secondly, the purpose ofthis letter is to reiterate the need to continue having the EAS program in our community. The City of El Centro as the County seat is home to several federal and state government agencies, such as the Social Security Administration, Employment Development Department, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Homeland Security, and Bureau of Land Management. At the local level agencies, such as the County of Imperial, Imperial Irrigation District and the business community in general are being encouraged to make use of the carrier services being provided by SeaPort Airlines. SeaPort Airlines has been implementing a very aggressive five year marketing strategy to promote its carrier services in the community and is committed to continue offering its services. Should the community lose the EAS program the damage would be detrimental.
We strongly urge you to continue the EAS Program in our community and approve SeaPort has the providerfor Imperial CountyAirport. For a 

### ElCentroCityHall 1275MainStreet,ElCentro, CA92243 (760) 337-4540 Fax(760) 352-6177Letterto Scott Faulk February 12, 2015 Page 2 community that has historically experienced a 20% unemployment rate and whose median household income is $38,297 compared to $61,632 statewide the loss of the EAS program is detrimental. Furthermore, our community is still trying to recover from one ofthe toughest economic recessions it has ever experienced.
Once again, than you for not terminating the EAS program at the Imperial County Airport. We look forward as a community to continue increasing our enplanements in orderto not lose the EAS program in El Centro, California.
#### STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. STATE INSURANCE FUND, and Theodore Riley, Plaintiffs in error, v. A. B. BONE, Defendant in error.

No. 38228.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 30, 1959.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1959.

*571Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Fred Hansen, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Jack Baird, Dudley, Dudley & Dudley, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

John B. Ogden, Oklahoma City, Busby, Stanfield, Deaton & West, Ada, for defendant in error.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and judgment for A. B. Bone against Theodore Riley, employee of the State Insurance Fund, and the State Insurance Fund for damages to his car and for personal injuries sustained by him while driving his car upon a public highway. It was alleged that Riley’s negligence in driving his car while on a mission for the State Insurance Fund caused the plaintiff’s damages.

This is a companion case to the case of State of Oklahoma ex rel. State Insurance Fund v. Bone, No. 38, 150, Okl., 344 P.2d 562.

By order of this Court the two causes were consolidated for the purpose of briefing. They each involve the same material factual matters and questions of law.

The answers to the questions of fact and problems of law being the same, so far as material herein, and for the reasons given in the opinion filed in cause No. 38,-150, we apply the reasoning of said opinion to the instant case and adopt the syllabus in No. 38,150 as the law in this case and affirm the verdict and judgment in favor of A. B. Bone.

DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

HALLEY, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Glenn Welstad, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Command Center, Inc.
(the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       August 15, 2006

/s/ Glenn Welstad
--------------------------------
Glenn Welstad
President and Chief Executive Officer
Docket No. FAA-2012-1314
# Critical Infrastructure - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Eve Lettau The post Eve Lettau appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Gregory Faulkner Program Analyst.The post Gregory Faulkner appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Christopher Brazell Program Manager.The post Christopher Brazell appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Molly de Marcellus Program Analyst.The post Molly de Marcellus appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Sarah Arney The post Sarah Arney appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2009141EN.01003506.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-463/08) (1)

1

2009/C 141/71

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 327, 20.10.2008.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: March 31, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joseph C. LevesqueName:
    
    Joseph C. LevesqueTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive OfficerDate: March 31, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Douglas L. HemerName:
    
    Douglas L. HemerTitle:
    
    Chief Administrative OfficerDate: March 31, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Paul H. AskegaardName:
    
    Paul H. AskegaardTitle:
    
    Treasurer (principal financial andaccounting officer)