alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc.
(the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 23, 2009

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 5815 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 039

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### M odify the affected

potable water

service panel

access door 21 .0 $ 1,785.0

0 $15,280 $ 17,065.00 

### 63 $ 1,075,095.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 1,075,095



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or mi ght not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MURDOCK
COMMUNICATION'S CORPORATION AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AS ARE CONTAINED IN MURDOCK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND THE ACCOMPANYING FOOTNOTES.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,241,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,268,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                     51,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,698,909
<PP&E>                                      13,362,979
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,559,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,479,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,112,728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,480
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,820,898
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,646,322)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,479,086
<SALES>                                      7,732,254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,164,602
<CGS>                                        5,239,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,280,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,448,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,563,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,571,953)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,084,314
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,487,639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)


</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPTEMBER 1, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13520

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 09-20143-CR-CMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SILVIO REYES,

 Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 1, 2011)

Before EDMONDSON, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rene Palomino, Jr., appointed counsel for Silvio Reyes in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reyes’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
<PAGE>   1
                                    AMENDMENT
                             TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT amends as of September 25, 1996 the Management Agreement
("Agreement") made October 23, 1991, as amended, by and between Philadelphia
Insurance Company and ("PIC") and Maguire Insurance Agency, Inc. ("Maguire").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Maguire performs a variety of services for PIC under the
         Agreement;


         WHEREAS, PIC and Maguire desire to modify certain terms of the
         Agreement;


         NOW, THEREFORE, PIC and Maguire, intending to be legally bound hereby,
         agree as follows:


         1.       It is acknowledged that the compensation for services provided
                  by Maguire, beginning in 1994 and for each year thereafter,
                  per "Amendment No. 1 to Management Agreement" were based upon
                  budgeted expenses. To the extent these expenses deviate
                  materially from actual expenses the parties agree to
                  reasonably adjust the compensation.

         2.       The due date for premium remittance from Maguire to PIC as
                  stated in Paragraph 2J of the Agreement shall be 90 days after
                  the end of the month for the "All Other Class" of business.

         3.       The term of the Agreement as stated in Paragraph 8 is extended
                  for an additional five (5) years.

         4.       The authority, right, duty or obligation of Maguire to arrange
                  for reinsurance on behalf of PIC is terminated.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands
and seals as of the day and year first above written.

                                 PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By:      /s/ James J. Maguire
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         James J. Maguire, President

                                Attest:  /s/ Sean S. Sweeney
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Sean S. Sweeney, Senior Vice President


                               MAGUIRE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC

                                By:      /s/ James J. Maguire
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         James J. Maguire, President

                               Attest:  /s/ Sean S. Sweeney
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Sean S. Sweeney, Senior Vice President
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                              EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                           QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months       Six Months
                                                              Ended            Ended
                                                          June 30, 1998     June 30, 1998
                                                          -------------     -------------
<S>                                                       <C>               <C>          
Net income                                                $       9,018     $      36,617
                                                          =============     =============

Average shares outstanding                                      560,272           559,819
Basic earnings per share                                  $         .02     $         .07
                                                          =============     =============
                                                          

Average shares outstanding                                      560,272           559,819
Dilutive average shares outstanding under
   warrants and options                                         207,800           207,800
Exercise price                                            $       10.00     $       10.00
Assumed proceeds on exercise                              $   2,078,000     $   2,078,000
Average market value                                      $       12.50     $       12.50
Less:  Treasury stock purchased with assumed
       proceeds from exercise of warrants and options           166,240           166,240
Adjusted average shares-diluted                                 601,832           601,379
Diluted earnings per share                                $         .01     $         .06
                                                          =============     =============
                                                         
</TABLE>


         The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange. The
average market values are derived from trades known to management. Private sales
may occur where management of the Company is unaware of the sales price.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
John Lichter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Sebastien DuFort,
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                               By /s/ John Lichter
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  John Lichter, Chief Executive Officer
                                  Date: 11/21/05

                               By /s/ Sebastien DuFort
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Sebastien DuFort, President and Acting Chief
                                  Financial Officer
                                  Date: 11/21/05
#### Eugen O. Kronisch, Plaintiff, *v.*Seaford-Mar Marina, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

July 17, 1959.

*Weil, Gotshal & Manges*for plaintiff.

*David Hoffman*for M. Pinsker & Co., Inc., defendant.

*Thurston & Asip*for Seaford-Mar Marina, Inc., defendant.

Henry Epstein, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment and for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the counterclaim of Seaford-Mar Marina, Inc., on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff’s complaint is grounded on a series of 14 negotiable promissory notes payable to N. Pinsker *&*Co., Inc. Defendant Mar-Marina admits the making of the notes but denies that Pinsker negotiated the notes for value to plaintiff.

Defendant N. Pinsker & Co., Inc., by separate motion seeks summary judgment against Seaford Mar-Marina, Inc., in the event that plaintiff obtain judgment against the latter.

*33There is no doubt that the note in question was negotiable and if plaintiff takes the note under the following conditions, he is a holder in due course: (1) that it is complete and regular on its face; (2) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without notice that it had been previously dishonored if such was the fact; (3) that he took it in good faith and for value; (4) that at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the person negotiating it.

To constitute notice of an infirmity in an instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating same, the person to whom it is negotiated must have actual knowledge of the infirmity or defect or knowledge of such facts that his action in taking the instrument amounted to bad faith.

In *Hall*v. *Bank of Blasdell*(306 N. Y. 336, 341) we find the following: *“*As the statute itself makes evident, its requirement ‘ is good faith, and bad faith is not mere carelessness. It is nothing less than guilty knowledge or willful ignorance. * * * One who purchases commercial paper for full value * * * is not bound at his peril to be upon the alert for circumstances which might possibly excite the suspicions of wary vigilance. He does not owe to the party who puts negotiable paper afloat the duty of active inquiry, to avert the imputation of bad faith. The rights of the holder are to be determined by the simple test of honesty and good faith, and not by speculations in regard to the purchaser’s diligence or negligence ’. *(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.*v. *Sapowitch,*296 N. Y. 226, 229-230.) ”

Applying this test to the instant facts, the conclusion is clear that plaintiff must prevail and so the motion is granted.

Settle order.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4347 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to include veterans in the military 

adaptive sports program of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. GAETZ (for himself, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. LOEBSACK, 

Mr. JONES, Mr. SOTO, Mr. COOK, Mr. ROSS, Ms. MCSALLY, and Mr. 

BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to include veterans 

in the military adaptive sports program of the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Warrior Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF VETERANS IN MILITARY ADAPTIVE 

6 SPORTS PROGRAM. 

7 Section 2564a of title 10, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4347 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘and vet2 erans’’ after ‘‘members of the armed forces’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘and vet4 erans’’ after ‘‘members’’. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
# Russell - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. Executive Director Waylon Wright Email w&#97;&#x79;&#x6c;o&#110;&#64;&#x6c;&#x63;a&#100;&#x64;&#x2e;o&#114;&#103;The post Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2009220EN.01003202.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Mologen v OHIM (dSLIM)

(Case T-504/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Partial refusal to register - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 220/67

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mologen AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Klages, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 September 2008 (Case R 1077/2007-4) concerning an application for the registration of the word mark ‘dSLIM’ as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no further need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no further need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 14, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 146 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-122, CP2024-128.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28061 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2008209EN.01007402.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/74

---

Action brought on 19 June 2008 — Avogadri and Others v Commission

(Case F-58/08)

(2008/C 209/137)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Chiara Avogadri and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decisions fixing the applicants' conditions of employment as members of the contract staff or members of the temporary staff in so far as the duration of their contract or its extension is limited to a specific duration.

Form of order sought

The applicants claim the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decisions fixing the applicants' conditions of employment in so far as the duration of their contract or its extension is limited to a specific duration; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions fixing the applicants' conditions of employment in so far as the duration of their contract or its extension is limited to a specific duration;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---