alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015046EN.01004001.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Eni v Commission

(Case T-558/08) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements - Paraffin waxes market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price fixing - Proof of the infringement - 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines - Equal treatment - Aggravating circumstances - Repeated infringement - Obligation to state reasons - Attenuating circumstances - Substantially reduced participation - Infringement committed by negligence - Rights of the defence - Unlimited jurisdiction))

(2015/C 046/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eni SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, D. Durante, G. Rizza, S. Valentino and L. Bellia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and V. Di Bucci, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Principally, an application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2008) 5476 final of 1 October 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.181 — Candle Waxes), and, in the alternative, an application for annulment or reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Eni SpA in Article 2 of Commission Decision C (2008) 5476 final of 1 October 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.181 — Candle Waxes) at EUR 1 8 2 00  000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Eni SpA in Article 2 of Commission Decision C (2008) 5476 final of 1 October 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.181 — Candle Waxes) at EUR 1 8 2 00  000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear half of its own costs and half of the costs incurred by Eni. Eni shall bear half of its own costs and half of those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear half of its own costs and half of the costs incurred by Eni. Eni shall bear half of its own costs and half of those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5634]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                THANKING ERNIE ALLEN FOR A JOB WELL DONE

  (Mr. BARROW asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. BARROW. Mr. Speaker, I rise to pay my respects to a tireless 
crusader in the quest to protect America's children from violence and 
exploitation.
  Ernie Allen recently retired as the president and chief executive 
officer of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, where 
his mission was to protect our Nation's children.
  Under Ernie's leadership, the National Center for Missing & Exploited 
Children played a crucial role in recovering some 74,000 children. With 
Ernie at the helm, they saw their recovery rate for missing children 
climb from 62 percent in 1990 to 94 percent today.
  While there's no official record book of what Ernie has accomplished 
over the years, his record lives on in the lives he has saved and the 
families he has reunited.
  I know I speak for my colleagues in the Congressional Missing, 
Exploited and Runaway Children's Caucus and for thousands of grateful 
families all across the Nation in thanking Ernie Allen for a job well 
done.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANGELA MARINUCCI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 52 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of June , 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Hana
      Biosciences, Inc. does hereby certify that to the best of his
      knowledge:





(a)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hana Biosciences, Inc. for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Hana Biosciences,
      Inc.





Dated:
                August 11, 2008
            /s/
                Steven R. Deitcher, MDSteven
                R. Deitcher, MDPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
                August 11, 2008
            /s/
                John P. IparraguirreJohn
                P. IparraguirreVice
                President, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1357-E1358]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING FRANK C. FRANCO

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JIM COSTA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Mr. COSTA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to the service of 
Mr. Frank Franco or as we affectionately call him, ``Franco''. Frank 
Franco's many years of dedicated service to the community and our 
nation's veterans exemplifies his reverence for our country and truly 
demonstrates the best of what America has to offer.
  Frank Franco was born in El Centro, California. He joined the United 
States Army at age 17 and honorably served his country with two tours 
of service in Vietnam.
  A tireless advocate for helping people, Franco has been with Fresno 
County Economic Opportunities Commission, EOC, for over 30 years. He is 
a hard worker and has held many leadership positions in the community. 
Franco is a past director of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control 
District, is on the Mayor's Advisory Committee and is a past recipient 
of the Key to the City of Fresno.
  Each year, Franco travels to our nation's capital with the Fresno 
Council of Governments One Voice-DC trip. Franco has over 50 
proclamations and awards he has received throughout the years. In 
addition to his civic leadership, Franco is also a proud member of 
Veterans of Foreign War, VFW, Post 8900 in Fresno. He serves on my 
Veteran Leaders Advisory Group and participates in numerous local 
veterans' events, such as the Veterans Stand Down. Franco is always 
helping, always working.
  I applaud Frank Franco for his many years of tireless work on behalf 
of the community, on behalf of veterans and their families and the 
Central Valley. We know Franco will enjoy more time with his wife, 
Maria, his children, Jack Arthur, Madelene, and Tina, and his 
grandchildren.
  Mr. Speaker, it should be noted that in addition to his countless 
gifts to the community,

[[Page E1358]]

Franco is my good friend and he is a true champion of the people. He 
has always been available to discuss issues and work together to make 
our Central Valley a better place to live and work. I extend to him my 
very best wishes and ask my colleagues to join with me in recognizing 
the commitment, dedication, and success of Frank C. Franco.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2009044EN.01003502.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/35

---

Action brought on 4 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-544/08)

(2009/C 44/58)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell, L. Jelínek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Commission claims the Court should:

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC (1), or in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 64 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC (1), or in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 64 of that directive;

1

| — | order Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementing the Directive into the domestic legal order expired on 10 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 323, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23**
 
 
 
 **INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Board of Directors  Summit Financial Corporation
  
 We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-83538, 33-94962, 33-94964 and 333-101367) on Form S-8 of Summit Financial Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated February 12, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Summit Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summit Financial Corporation and subsidiaries.
 
 
 Our report refers to the fact that on January 1, 2002 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets .
 
 
 
 
 /s/ KPMG LLPGreenville, South CarolinaMarch 17, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4326 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4326

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1211 Towanda Avenue in Bloomington, Illinois, as the ``Sgt. Josh 
                         Rodgers Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2017

 Mr. LaHood (for himself, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Rush, Ms. 
   Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Quigley, Mr. 
    Roskam, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. 
  Schakowsky, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Foster, Mr. Bost, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. 
Shimkus, Mr. Kinzinger, and Mrs. Bustos) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1211 Towanda Avenue in Bloomington, Illinois, as the ``Sgt. Josh 
                         Rodgers Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. JOSH RODGERS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1211 Towanda Avenue in Bloomington, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sgt. Josh Rodgers Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. Josh 
Rodgers Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 459 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4406 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 14, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, 

as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 99 Macombs Place in New York, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post Office Building’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4406 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS

amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 459 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4406 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. York, New York, as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post al Service located at 99 Macombs Place in New 

JUNE 14, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
- 1
- Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

March 2, 2010

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. For Renewal of Exemption Authority Pursuant to 49 U.S.C § 40109 (U.S. – China Codesharing) Dockets DOT-OST-1997-2653, DOT-OST-2001-9314 and DOT-OST-2001-10172

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced renewal application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, Delta urges that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen
### PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD) :

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL AND

INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

March 201 1

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This D ocument was prepared fo r the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

,

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Mitchell, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered May 26, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the People disproved his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. It is well settled that justification is not a defense to the use of deadly physical force unless the actor reasonably believes that another person is using or is about to use deadly physical force against him and he is not able to retreat with complete safety (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; *see, People v Goetz,*68 NY2d 96, 105-107; *People v McManus,*67 NY2d 541, 545-547; *People v Light,*170 AD2d 416; *People v Fousse,*167 AD2d 416). Although the defendant shot the victim after the victim first fired several shots into the ground, the defendant fired the fatal shot almost 30 seconds later, during which time the victim’s companion had pushed the victim back, stood in front of the victim, and told him, "It ain’t worth it”.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Combined Financial Statements at June 30, 1997 for the year ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909118
<NAME>              ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF MOLINE
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,377
<PP&E>                                          24,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,288
<SALES>                                         22,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,774
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-1278

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Osar Amon Tate, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 4, 1996 Filed: January 10, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Osar Amon Tate was charged with one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(iii), and one count of using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). After filing numerous unsuccessful pretrial motions, including a motion to dismiss the indictment, Tate pleaded guilty to both charges. The district court 1sentenced him to 71 months imprisonment on the drug count, to be followed by 60 months imprisonment on the firearm count, and four years supervised release.-2- On appeal, Tate's appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and was granted leave to withdraw. Although Tate was granted leave to file a pro se supplemental brief, he did not do so. We have reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
By pleading guilty, Tate waived all issues preceding his plea except those relating to jurisdiction. See United States v. McNeely , 20 F.3d 886, 888 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 171 (1994). We note that Tate's indictment clearly specified the requisite elements of his drug and firearm offenses, and thus it was not jurisdictionally defective. See O'Leary v. United States , 856 F.2d 1142, 1143 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (to establish jurisdictional defect, defendant must show that indictment "on its face fails to state an offense"). As to possible sentencing issues, only one of Tate's objections to the presentence report actually affected the length of his sentence. The district court sustained this objection, and then properly calculated Tate's sentence under the applicable Sentencing Guidelines.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.