alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5729]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO MEGAN RAPOSA

 Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, today I wish to recognize Megan 
Raposa, an intern in my Sioux Falls, SD, office, for all of the hard 
work she has done for me, my staff, and the State of South Dakota over 
the past several weeks.
  Megan is a graduate of St. Thomas More High School in Rapid City, SD. 
Currently, she is attending Augustana College where she is majoring in 
business communications and government. She is a hard worker who has 
been dedicated to getting the most out of her internship experience.
  I would like to extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to Megan 
for all of the fine work she has done and wish her continued success in 
the years to come.

                          ____________________
```
# Erie - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Jill Foys Email &#160;&#x6a;&#x69;&#x6c;&#x6c;&#102;&#64;&#110;&#111;rth&#x77;&#x65;&#x73;&#x74;&#x70;&#97;&#46;&#111;rgThe post Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2020077EN.01003901.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF

(Case C-334/19) (1)

(2020/C 77/56)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of  GRANT HAYWARD, INC., (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Kevin
      Ericksteen


Kevin
      Ericksteen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: December
      21, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Moore, Also Known as Tyrone Moore, Appellant.—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered October 31, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was charged with two counts of robbery in the first degree arising out of separate incidents involving different victims. The first robbery charge was dismissed during trial when the evidence revealed that the indictment had inaccurately set forth the date on which the crime allegedly took place. Although the court dismissed the first robbery charge, it ruled that due to the similar *modus operandi*allegedly employed by the defendant in committing the two robberies, the jury could consider the evidence adduced with respect to the dismissed charge in connection with its deliberations on the remaining count. The court promptly instructed the jury, however, that it could consider this evidence only as to the issue of the defendant’s identity in connection with the second incident. Significantly, the court repeated this instruction during its charge to the jury. On appeal, the defendant contends that the court’s failure to strike the testimony relating to the dismissed count deprived him of a fair trial. We disagree.

We note initially, that by failing to register an objection to admission of the evidence relating to the dismissed count, the defendant has failed to preserve his present assertions of error *849for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Forstell,*172 AD2d 621; *see also, People v Washington,*169 AD2d 795; *People v Bolling,*157 AD2d 733). In any event, the evidence was properly admitted since it was probative of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator of the remaining robbery count, a disputed issue in the case *(see, People v Molineux,*168 NY 264, 313; *see also, People v Carter,*77 NY2d 95, 100, *cert denied*— US —, 111 S Ct 1599; *People v Beam,*57 NY2d 241, 251). Moreover, and contrary to the defendant’s contentions, both of the crimes involved were committed in a strikingly similar and unusual fashion. Specifically, the record reveals that within a four month span, the defendant entered two different women’s clothing stores on the same street dressed as a woman, and stole property after either he or an accomplice displayed a knife to the salesperson who was present. The foregoing demonstrates that the defendant’s *modus operandi*was sufficiently unique to be probative and admissible on the issue of identity *(see, People v Beam, supra,*at 252-253; *People v Allweiss,*48 NY2d 40, 48; *People v Molineux, supra,*at 313; *People v Bowman,*155 AD2d 606).

Finally, the defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Hooper, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1397]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  HONORING REPRESENTATIVE ELENA PARENT

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JOHN LEWIS

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Georgia 
State Representative Elena Parent on the occasion of her retirement 
from the Georgia General Assembly. In her short time in the Georgia 
State House, Elena has made a profound impact on the Georgia 
Legislature, and I know that she will be missed by her constituents 
from the 81st District.
  Outside of public office, Elena is incredibly involved in the Metro 
Atlanta community, currently serving on the Foundation Board of the 
Georgia Association of Women Lawyers, the Advisory Board of Directors 
of It's a Journey, Inc., and the Women and Minorities in the Profession 
Committee of the State Bar of Georgia. She has also conducted 
fundraising and development efforts for HOPE Atlanta, a homelessness-
prevention non-profit. I commend her for such meaningful service to the 
people of Georgia.
  Elena recently announced that she will begin working as the Executive 
Director of Georgia Watch, a consumer advocacy group, at the end of her 
term this year. Having already received numerous awards for her 
leadership, including inclusion in the Atlanta Business Cronicle's ``40 
Under 40,'' Elena is an excellent choice for this position, and I look 
forward to hearing of her successes in the future.
  I wish Elena, her husband, Briley, and their son, Brooks, the very 
best.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE FIFTY

- NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, ELK AND CAMERON COUNTIES :

:

:

:

: No. 353 Judicial Classification Docket

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17 th day of December, 2018, upon the retirement of the

Honorable Richard A. Masson, President Judge of the Fifty

- N inth Judicial District,

Elk and Cameron Counties, effective December 31, 2018, pursuant to Article V,

Section 10(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution , the Honorable John H. Foradora

is hereby appointed acting President Judge of the Fifty

- N inth Judicial District, Elk

and Cameron Counties, effective January 1, 2019, until the judicial vacancy in that

District is filled or until further Order of this Court.
# C_2008223EN.01003501.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/35

---

Action brought on 3 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-297/08)

(2008/C 223/55)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Zadra, D. Recchia and J.-B. Laignelot, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt, in respect of the Region of Campania, all the necessary measures to ensure that waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without harming the environment and, in particular, by failing to establish an integrated and adequate network of disposal installations, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt, in respect of the Region of Campania, all the necessary measures to ensure that waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without harming the environment and, in particular, by failing to establish an integrated and adequate network of disposal installations, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste (1);

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the Commission seeks to obtain a declaration that the Italian Republic has failed to create, in the Region of Campania, an integrated and adequate network of disposal installations suitable to enable self-sufficiency in waste disposal characterised by the criterion of proximity. As recognised by the Italian authorities themselves in official communications, the failure to fulfil obligations complained of is a source of danger to human health and the environment and therefore constitutes infringement of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2006/12/EC.

---

(1)  OJ L 114 of 27.4.2006, p. 9.

1

---
# Heard - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Three Rivers Regional Commission Executive Director Kirk Fjelstul Email &#x6b;&#x66;&#x6a;&#x65;&#x6c;&#x73;&#x74;&#x75;&#x6c;&#x40;&#x74;&#x68;&#x72;&#x65;&#101;&#114;&#105;&#118;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#114;&#99;&#46;&#99;omThe post Three Rivers Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008116EN.01000902.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/9

---

Action brought on 20 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-70/08)

(2008/C 116/16)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and J. Enegren, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/72/EC of 22 July 2003 supplementing the Statute for a European Cooperative Society with regard to the involvement of employees (1), or by not ensuring that management and labour introduce the required provisions by way of agreement, or, in any case, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/72/EC of 22 July 2003 supplementing the Statute for a European Cooperative Society with regard to the involvement of employees (1), or by not ensuring that management and labour introduce the required provisions by way of agreement, or, in any case, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2003/72/EC expired on 18 August 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 207, p. 25.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 29, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 26, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 159 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-144, CP2024-150.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28744 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 30371 Summary Calendar

Adam Shane Swindle,

Petitioner

— Appellant ,

versus

S. Ma'at,

Respondent

— Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:21

- CV

- 400

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Adam Shane Swindle, federal prisoner # 32320

- 001, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his disciplinary conviction for attempted mail
abuse and the resulting loss of good time credits . The Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) found that Swindle attempted to have Cellmate and Convict

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5t h Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 22, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-30371 Document: 00516103943 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2021No. 21

- 30371

2 Services send an item to an address in Alabama instead of to his prison address, which would have circumvented the prison’ s mail monitoring procedures. The district court concluded that the prison disciplinary procedures afforded Swindle due proce ss and that some evidence supported the conviction. On appeal, Swindle argues that there was no evidence in the record to support a finding that he committed attempted mail abuse.
“[P]rison disciplinary proceedings will be overturned only where
there is n o evidence whatsoever to support the decision of the prison
officials.” Reeves v. Pettcox , 19 F.3d 1060, 1062 (5th Cir. 1994). We review de novo whether there is “some evidence” in the record to support the
decision

. Teague v. Quarterman , 482 F.3d 769, 773 (5th Cir. 2007). Here, Swindle does not dispute that he attempted to have an item sent to a non

prison address, and he admitte d that conduct during the hearing before the DHO. Therefore, there was “some evidence in the record to support the disciplinary decision.” Broussard v. Johnson , 253 F.3d 874, 876 (5th
Cir. 2001) ( internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see 28 C.F .R. § 541.3 (Table 1).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 21-30371 Document: 00516103943 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2021
# Henry - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Piedmont Community Services Board: Expanding Community Connection in Virginia Across the Commonwealth of Virginia, Community Service Boards (CSBs)&#160;serve as joint partnerships between state and local governments to meet&#160;critical&#160;behavioral health needs in&#160;every county.&#160;Piedmont Regional Community Services Board&#160;has long served as one of those entities, providing support for&#160;over the last 40 years for over 7,500 individuals each year.&#160;Piedmont’s offerings have included services for&#160;individuals facing&#160;mental health&#160;issues, developmental&#160;disabilities,&#160;substance [&#8230;]The post Piedmont Community Services Board: Expanding Community Connection in Virginia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- West Piedmont Planning District Commission Executive Director Kristina Eberly Email &#x6b;&#101;&#x62;&#101;r&#x6c;&#121;&#64;&#x77;&#112;&#x70;&#x64;c&#x2e;&#111;r&#x67;The post West Piedmont Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010288EN.01003602.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein v OHIM (Hunter)

(Case T-505/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Hunter - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application)

(2010/C 288/69)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development (Leopoldshohe, Germany) (represented by: C. Czychowski, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schaffner, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 September 2008, as corrected on 5 February 2009 (Case R 1733/2007-1), concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign Hunter.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

---
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2nd. A correction was made to add the “What You 

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in 

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2, 2015

Mr. Andrew Pena

3513 North Gravel Circle

Southlake, TX 76092

Dear Mr. Pena:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 30, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0833), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 13.2

LOGO

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

That Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                    |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: September 24, 2007 |  | /s/ Kenneth A Dean
|                          |  | Name:              |  | Kenneth A Dean         
|                          |  | Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer