alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

September 2, 2009

I hereby certify that a public hearing was held May 26, 2009, on a revision to the State of

Delaware State Implementation Plan for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe National

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, amending Regulation No. 1146 -ELECTRIC

GENERATING UNIT (EGU) MULTI-POLLUTANT REGULATION. The revision is anamendment to, 7 DE Admin. Code 1146- ELECTRIC GENERATiNG UNIT (EGU) MULTIPOLLUTANT REGULATION. 7 DE Admin. Code 1146 was originally promulgated in

November 2006 (then Regulation No. 1146 ofthe State of Delaware Regulations Governing the

Control of Air Pollution), and was submitted to the EPA as a SIP revision on November 16, 2006

This revision modifies the SO2 mass emissions limit associated with Edge Moor Unit 5 (asconstrained in 1146’s Table 5-1) from 2427 tons per year to 4600 tons per year, beginning incalendar year 2009. No other changes to 1146 have been made, including any change to the

existing requirement for Unit 5 to burn only low sulfur oil. The effective date of the revision is

October 10, 2009.

I further certify that the hearing was held in accordance with the notice required by Subsection

51.102 of4O CFR 51.

AdministratorAir Quality ManagementDivision of Air and Waste Management

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER

Ve€a4iae 4 T’ta(a’e Vefteid4 ot
<PAGE>





                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Jay M. Rosengarten, Chief Executive Officer of Lucille Farms, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 14, 2005


                           By: /s/ Jay M. Rosengarten
                           -------------------------------------------
                           Jay M. Rosengarten, Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lucille Farms, Inc. and will be retained by Lucille Farms, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
22033

#### State v. Cortez

Affirmed
# C_2020175EN.01001501.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2020 — XB v ECB

(Case T-484/18) (1)

(Civil service - ECB staff - Remuneration - Household allowance - Dependent child allowance - Education and pre-school allowances - Eligibility - Rejection of applications for those allowances - Conditions of Short-Term Employment - Conditions and rules applicable to short-term employment contracts)

(2020/C 175/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: XB (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: D. Camilleri Podestà and F. von Lindeiner, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the ECB’s decisions of 6 November and 4 December 2017 refusing to grant certain allowances and, as required, of the ECB’s decisions of 2 February 2018 rejecting the request for administrative review and of 5 June 2018 rejecting the request for a grievance procedure and, secondly, an order that the ECB pay the sum corresponding to those allowances.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders XB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders XB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          10,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         17,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,396
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,202)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.65)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88929-88930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 88930]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Centers of Biomedical 
Research Excellence (COBRE) Phase III--Transitional Centers (P30) 
Applications.
    Date: March 12-13, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Manas Chattopadhyay, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN12N, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-827-5320, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#59343837382a3a193438303577373031773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6dbd7d8d7c5d5f6dbd7dfda98d8dfde98d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, 
Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28392 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### WLEDDV »FAPI . TFXAS 

### Houston, Texas J SEP 04 pniR 

## OHR,STOPHERA.PR/NE Adriene Sibley ' —=£12*

v. Cause No. 14-15-00718-CV 

### Seminole Pipeline Co., LLC 

### Enterprise Products Operating, LLC First Call Field Service Corp. TDW Services, Inc. 

### Appellees MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE 

### Adriene Sibley request that this case be transferred to the First Court 

### of Appeal as Sibley's companion cases (01-15-00682-CV & 01-14-00454- CV) were filed in the First Court ofAppeals. 

### This case relates to Sibley's ownership interest in real estate and 01-14-0454-CV related to Sibley's ownership interest in the same real
estate. I Mrit wi it TX.T 

## Inthe Fourteenth CourtofAppeals / 14,hg°URT0FAPPEALq

Respectfully submitted

Adriene Sibley 4808 Fairmont Pkwy Pasadena, Texas 77505 

### sibleyadriene@yahoo.com 832-420-2071Certificate of Service 

### I copy ofthe foregoing Motion to Transfer has been served on the following parties via certified mail on September 4,2015. Seminole Pipeline Co., LLC Enterprise Products Operating James Freeman 

### 1135 Heights Blvd Houston, Texas 77008 First Call Field Service Corp. Cynthia Fronterhouse 8588 Katy Freeway #225 Houston, Texas 77024 TDW Service, INc. Marquel Sautural 700 Louisiana #400 Houston, Texas77002 

# (U /<*&**- Adriene Sibley
MEMORANDUM

DATE: October 26, 2011

FROM: Jennifer Chan, EPA/OW/OWM/WPD/RB

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0257, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 

(NPDES) General Permit for Discharges from the Application of Pesticides 

SUBJECT: Incorporation by reference of Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0852. 

The content of Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0852, ICR: National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for Point Source Discharges from the Application 

of Pesticides to Waters of the United States contains information that is relevant to 

Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0257. Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0852 is hereby 

incorporated by reference into Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0257.
#### Eugene Jones et al., Appellants, v Bruno Bogucki, Respondent.

Crew III, J.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Owen, J.), entered November 29, 1989 in Orange County, upon a verdict rendered in favor of defendant.

*478On November 14, 1987, plaintiffs were driving north on State Route 145 and defendant was heading west on State Route 81 when their automobiles collided at the intersection of the two highways in the Town of Rensselaerville, Albany County. Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendant’s negligence and, following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Supreme Court denied plaintiffs’ motions to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and to direct a verdict in favor of plaintiffs; this appeal ensued.

Plaintiffs contend that Supreme Court erred in not setting aside the verdict as being against the weight of the evidence. More specifically, plaintiffs assert that they were not negligent because they were reacting under an emergency situation and that defendant was negligent. We disagree. At trial plaintiffs claimed that defendant failed to stop at a stop sign and pulled in front of plaintiffs’ vehicle causing the accident. Defendant stated that he stopped at the intersection, looked right and left, pulled into the intersection and was struck by plaintiffs’ vehicle which was traveling fast. That sharp conflict of evidence presented questions of fact and credibility which the jury implicitly resolved in defendant’s favor *(see, Kallasy v New York Tel. Co.,*70 AD2d 749). Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to defendant, we do not find that the evidence so preponderates in favor of plaintiffs that a finding in favor of defendant was not reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Meyer v Smiley Bros.,*145 AD2d 674, 675-676). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict.

Plaintiffs’ contentions that Supreme Court erred in instructing the jury concerning an uncontrolled intersection is without merit. Defendant testified that there was no stop sign at the intersection. Plaintiffs testified that there was. The conflicting testimony presented a question of fact for resolution by the jury *(see, Kallasy v New York Tel. Co., supra).*Accordingly, Supreme Court’s charge to the jury was proper.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contention and find that it is unpersuasive.

Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Levine, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,511
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,365
<PP&E>                                         123,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,526,641 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,351
<BONDS>                                        325,686
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          148,669
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,614,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,526,641
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,142
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (97,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (104,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (86,382)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (191,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, Christopher J. Reed,
      Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and





2.
            The
                information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reeds,
                Inc.










/s/ Christopher J. Reed


Christopher J. Reed,





Chief
      Executive Officer, President and
      Chief
      Financial Officer





November
      17, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6007]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  REQUIRING TSA TO COMPLY WITH THE UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND 
                        REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Commerce 
Committee be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 3670, and 
the Senate proceed to its consideration.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk 
will report the bill by title.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 3670) to require the Transportation Security 
     Administration to comply with the Uniformed Service 
     Employment and Re-Employment Rights Act.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be 
read the third time and passed, the motion to reconsider be laid upon 
the table, with no intervening action or debate, and that any 
statements related to the measure be printed in the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The bill (H.R. 3670) was read the third time and passed.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2018427EN.01009002.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/90

---

Action brought on 20 September 2018 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission

(Case T-561/18)

(2018/C 427/119)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ITD, Brancheorganisation for den danske vejgodstransport A/S (Padborg, Denmark) and Danske Fragtmænd A/S (Åbyhøj, Denmark) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2018) 3169 final of 28 May 2018 in State aid case SA.47707 (2018/N) — State compensations granted to PostNord for the provision of the universal postal service — Denmark; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2018) 3169 final of 28 May 2018 in State aid case SA.47707 (2018/N) — State compensations granted to PostNord for the provision of the universal postal service — Denmark; (1)

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law, alleging failure by the Commission to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU, despite the serious difficulties arising in the assessment of the measures at issue. This plea based on two series of arguments relating to the length and circumstances of the preliminary investigation procedure as well as to the content of the contested decision.

| — | As regards the content of the contested decision, the applicants claim, in particular, that: (i) the universal service obligation compensation is not compatible with the internal market; (ii) the State guarantees do not constitute existing aid; (iii) the VAT exemption is imputable to the State; (iv) the misallocation of costs involves the transfer of State resources and is imputable to the State; and (v) the capital injection of 23 February 2017 is imputable to the State and confers an economic advantage on Post Danmark. |
| --- | --- |

—

As regards the content of the contested decision, the applicants claim, in particular, that: (i) the universal service obligation compensation is not compatible with the internal market; (ii) the State guarantees do not constitute existing aid; (iii) the VAT exemption is imputable to the State; (iv) the misallocation of costs involves the transfer of State resources and is imputable to the State; and (v) the capital injection of 23 February 2017 is imputable to the State and confers an economic advantage on Post Danmark.

---

(1)  OJ 2018 C 360, p. 3.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of RichmanHousing
      Credits Inc., general partnerof
      Richman Tax Credit Properties IIIL.P.,
      General Partner of the RegistrantJune
      25, 2010
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES OF CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AS OF JUNE 30, 2007
  State ofCorporate Name
    
    OrganizationDurocraft International, Inc.
    
    TexasC/D/R Incorporated
    
    DelawareTrade Source International, Inc. (TSI)
    
    DelawareTSI Prime Asia Limited
    
    Hong KongElitex Development Limited
    
    Hong KongPrime/Home Impressions, LLC
    
    North CarolinaDesign Trends, LLC
(in which Craftmade owns a 50%
interest)
    
    Delaware