alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leonard Wilner, Appellant, v Charlotte Wilner, Respondent.

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), entered April 13, 1989, which, *inter alia,*directed him to pay permanent maintenance and a distributive award.

*159Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further findings consistent herewith.

The trial court failed to set forth the factors it considered in making its determination as to equitable distribution and the reason for its decision as required by Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (g) *(see also, Brundage v Brundage,*100 AD2d 887). That statute obliges courts to set forth the factors considered and the reasons underlying their decisions. That requirement may not be waived by either party or by counsel *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [g]). While courts are not required to analyze each of the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (d), they are duty bound to at least set forth the factors considered and state the reasons for their decisions *(see, O’Brien v O’Brien,*66 NY2d 576; *Cappiello v Cappiello,*66 NY2d 107, 110; *Reina v Reina,*153 AD2d 775).

Pending before the court at the time of trial were a motion by the defendant for leave to enter a judgment for alleged arrears with respect to a pendente lite order and a motion by the plaintiff for retroactive modification of the pendente lite order and for credit against any arrears for the $600 monthly rental income generated by the martial residence, which was received by the plaintiff. In commingling findings with respect to the motions along with findings with respect to equitable distribution, the trial court failed to render an explanation for its distribution of 75% of the marital assets to the defendant and 25% to the plaintiff. Among the other factors for which an explanation is sought on the remittitur are the directive that the plaintiff cash in his whole life insurance policy, with the proceeds thereof to be distributed to the parties, the reasons for awarding the defendant the sum of $200 per week maintenance plus carrying charges on the former marital residence, the court’s failure to specify a time limitation within which the former marital residence must be sold, and its failure to provide for the distribution of future rental income to be generated by the former marital residence prior to the court-ordered sale of the residence. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and Balletta, JJ., concur.
# C_2008260EN.01000801.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from House of Lords (United Kingdom) lodged on 23 July 2008 — The Queen (on the application of M) (FC) v Her Majesty's Treasury and two other actions

(Case C-340/08)

(2008/C 260/13)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

House of Lords

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Queen (on the application of M) (FC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Her Majesty's Treasury and two other actions

Defendant:

Question referred

Does Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 (1) apply to the provision by the State of social security or social assistance benefits to the spouse of a person designated by the Sanctions Committee established pursuant to United Nations Resolution 1267 (1999) on the ground only that the spouse lives with the designated person and will or may use some of the money to pay for goods and services which the latter will consume or from which he will benefit?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (OJ L 139, p. 9).

1

---
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Two Moons Kachinas Corp. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, David C. Merrell, President and director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 10/29/2004                     /s/David C. Merrell
      -----------                     ---------------------------
                                      David C. Merrell
                                      President
                                      director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Combined Financial Statements at June 30, 1997 for the year ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909117
<NAME>              ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF ALTON
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,377
<PP&E>                                          24,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,288
<SALES>                                         22,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,774
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21



               Subsidiaries of Murdock Communications Corporation


     As  of  December  31,  1999,  the  subsidiaries  of  Murdock Communications
Corporation  were  as  follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



Name                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
-------------------------------------------  ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>
MCC Acquisition Corp.                        Iowa
Priority International Communications Inc.   Texas
ATN Communications Incorporated              Delaware
INCOMEX, Inc.                                California
Guide*Star, L.L.C. (1)                       Iowa

____________________________
<FN>
(1)     Murdock  Communications Corporation has a 50% ownership interest in this
        limited  liability  company.
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Linesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  May 11, 2010






/s/ James Linesch


James Linesch


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)







A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of James Leman, Appellant, v Nicholas A. Longo et al., Respondents.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated August 13, 1991.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Bergerman in the Supreme Court. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.
# C_2020339EN.01001201.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Securitec v Commission

(Case T-661/18) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg - Rejection of a tenderer’s offer - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Selection criteria - Illegality of a clause in the tender specifications - Equal treatment)

(2020/C 339/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Securitec (Livange, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Peuvrel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Ilkova, A Katsimerou and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision of 7 September 2018 to reject the tender submitted by the applicant for lot No. 4 of the contract which was the subject of the restricted tender procedure HR/R1/PR/2017/059 and relating to the ‘maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg’, and second, of the Commission’s decision of 17 September 2018 to refuse to provide the applicant with the clarifications that it had requested in the context of that procedure on 11 September 2018

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 7 September 2018 to reject the tender submitted by Securitec for lot no. 4 of the contract that was the subject of restricted tender procedure HR/R1/PR/2017/059 relating to the ‘maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg’ and the decision of the Commission of 17 September 2018 to refuse to provide Securitec with the clarifications that it had requested in the context of that procedure on 11 September 2018; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 7 September 2018 to reject the tender submitted by Securitec for lot no. 4 of the contract that was the subject of restricted tender procedure HR/R1/PR/2017/059 relating to the ‘maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the European Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg’ and the decision of the Commission of 17 September 2018 to refuse to provide Securitec with the clarifications that it had requested in the context of that procedure on 11 September 2018;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
05/04/2010 07:33 FAX 2024935142 FAA •> DMS @1001/001 

Law Office of Edward A. Lopez 

Attorney At Law 

April 16"\2010 

CiP[C>Suj cxboH- / Z<^lo-o3j ^ Federal AviaUon Administration _ _ _ 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Hearing, Room 2 W2014 ^^^"- --.-x—.. . . , TM. >.>, 

Re: In the Matter of Roslync Marie KIdcr 

Docket No.: CP- To Be Assigned y^Pp 2 (^ ^fi^f) 

FAACascNo.2009SW290135 ' ' 

To Whom Tt May Concern: Hb.^R^V G DOOKE ^ 

Please be advised that 1 am Ibrmally withdrawing as Ms. Elder's atlonioy of record 

in the above maner. Due to the location of Ms. Elder's hearing in Fort Worth, TX I have 

advised to hire local counsel as 1 can no longer be of assistance in her case. Please feel 

iVee to'contact TTie~should youliave any questioTis'conceming this matter. 

CC: Roslyne Marie Elder 

Yolanda Ayaia Bemal, Esq., Department of Transportation, Office of Regional 

Counsel 

Venture Corporate Center 

3440 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 415 Tel 954*241-4205 

Hollywood. FL 33021 ^ ^ 954*241'4206
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q(the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chua Leong Hin,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



/s/ Chua Leong Hin
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 245 (Friday, December 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12291]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: Exhibition of ``Mosaic of the 
House of the Citharist of Pompeii'' Object

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary exhibition or display in the Department of Greek and Roman 
Art of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of 
cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cdbea8aeb9a4a2a3fff9f8f48dbeb9acb9a8e3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3043555344595f5e020405097043445144551e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-28205 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Combined Financial Statements at June 30, 1997 for the year ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909114
<NAME>              ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF GALESBURG
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                       224
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,281
<PP&E>                                          24,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,353
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,847
<SALES>                                         29,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                       270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE lJNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMßIA

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, et ai., ) Plaintiffs, ))

v. ) )

)

LISA P. JACKSON, Administrator, )

United States Environmental Protection Agency, ) Defendant. ))

)

Case No.: 1 :09-cv-00089-CKK

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO MODIFY CONSENT DECREE

WHEREAS, on February 5, 2010, the Court entered a Consent Decree in this matter,

which set forth January 31, 201 1, as the date by which EP A would issue various proposed ru les

and/or determinations pursuant to 42 U.S.c. §§ 7411 (b)( J )(B), 7412(d)(6), and 7412(1)(2): see

Docket Entry 25, paragraphs 3-5;

WHEREAS, the Consent Decree allows for modification of any provision of the Consent

Decree by written stipulation of the Parties with notice to the Court. see id. at paragraph 1 O(a):

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. EPA is no longer requiredto perform the actions discussed in paragraphs 3-5 of

the Consent Decree by January 31, 201 1.

2. Instead, EPA must perform such actions no later than April 29, 201 J.

3. With the exception of the above-stated modifications, no other provision of the

Consent Decree has been modified.

SO AGREED:

Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 26 Filed 01/25/11 Page 1 of 2
FOR PLAINTIFFS ¡t /, -~t.. ~

Earth j usti ce

i 400 Glenarm Place, Suite 300

Denver, CO 80202

Tel: (303) 623-9466

Fax: (303) 623-8083

reoo I ey (?earthj usti ce.org

FOR DEFENDANT

DATED:gik!I\ .._n__

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney Gcneral

~f4l!~~ f) ~tl~tlStephanie Talbert/

U.S. Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Division

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, DC 20026-3986

Phone (202) 514-2617

Fax (202) 514-8865

steDhanie. talbcrt(iusdoi .gov

2

Case 1:09-cv-00089-CKK Document 26 Filed 01/25/11 Page 2 of 2