alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,416)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,927
<PP&E>                                         190,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,668
<BONDS>                                         35,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           296
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,952
<SALES>                                         87,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,023
<CGS>                                           49,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,524
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial and Investment Officer of Colonial
Properties Trust, hereby certifies that, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

      (a)   The Form 10-K of Colonial Properties Trust for the period ended
            December 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
            Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (b)   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            Colonial Properties Trust.

Date: March 16, 2005                By:   /s/ Weston M. Andress
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                          Weston M. Andress
                                          Chief Financial and Investment Officer

       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Colonial Properties Trust
and will be retained by Colonial Properties Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       98
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4407 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     November 15, 2018.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
4407) entitled ``An Act to designate the facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, 
Illinois, as the `Corporal Jeffery Allen Williams Post Office 
Building'.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 2, line 1, strike [Jeffery] and insert Jeffrey.

(2)On page 2, line 6, strike [Jeffery] and insert Jeffrey.

(3)On page 2, line 10, strike [Jeffery] and insert Jeffrey.

            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to designate the 
        facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3s101 
        Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the `Corporal 
        Jeffrey Allen Williams Post Office Building'.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 4407

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related prospectus of ANTEC Corporation
for the registration of $115,000,000 of its 4 1/2% Convertible Subordinated
Notes due 2003 and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated February 9, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of ANTEC Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements and in the related prospectuses of ANTEC Corporation listed below of
our report dated February 9, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of ANTEC Corporation included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999:

     Registration Statement No. 33-71384 on Form S-8 (Amended and
          Restated Employee Stock Incentive Plan)
     Registration Statement No. 3371386 on Form S-8 (ANTEC Corporation
          Director Stock Option Plan)
     Registration Statement No. 3371388 on Form S-8 (ANTEC Corporation
          Employee Stock Purchase Plan)
     Registration Statement No. 3389704 on Form S-8 (ANTEC/Keptel
          Exchange Options)
     Registration Statement No. 333-11921 on Form S-8 (ESP Stock Plan)
     Registration Statement No. 333-12131 on Form S-8 (ANTEC Corporation
          Amended and Restated Employee Stock Incentive Plan)
     Registration Statement No. 333-19129 on Form S-8 (TSX Corporation
          1996 Second Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive
          Compensation Program; TSX Corporation 1993 Amended and
          Restated Directors Stock Option Plan, As Amended; TSX
          Corporation 1994 W.H. Lambert Stock Option Agreement)
     Registration Statement No. 333-90559 on Form S-8 (Amended and
          Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan)
     Registration Statement No. 333-90561 on Form S-8 (ANTEC Corporation
          1997 Stock Incentive Plan)


                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
March 22, 2000
#### Emanuel Flanagan et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Emanuel Anania et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

October 30, 1959.

*Louis H. Levine*for plaintiffs.

*Bernard Helfenstein*for King Kullen Grocery Co., Inc., defendant.

*Earl J. Nettleton*for Emanuel Anania and another, defendants.

*Emanuel Morgenbesser*for 3537 Merrick Road, Seaford, Inc., defendant.

Mamo Pittoni, J.

The plaintiffs move for summary judgement against defendant Anania, the owner of the motor vehicle, and defendant Santini, the operator.

The plaintiffs state that they went into the vestibule entrance of a King Kullen Super Market to make certain purchases when the defendants’ automobile, traveling backwards, entered the vestibule and knocked down and injured the plaintiffs.

The examinations before trial, upon which the plaintiffs rely, show that Santini had been the operator of the vehicle some time prior to the accident and that Anania had been seated *720beside Mm with a package in his lap. Both defendants say that Santini parked the car, set the hand brake, got out of the car and went into a store. After Santini came out he saw the car moving backwards. He does not remember whether he left the engine running or whether he took the keys out of the car. However, Anania states that after Santini left the car he tried to lift the package in his lap, to put it on the back seat, and then all of a sudden the car began to move.

If Santini was negligent, then Anania can be held liable under section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. If Santini was not negligent, but Anania negligently caused the car to move, only defendant Anania could be held liable.

The plaintiffs do not establish that the car was moving with the engine running and in reverse gear. This appears unlikely; the car had a standard shift, and when Santini left the car, if it were in reverse, it would either have stalled or have started backing immediately, and not after the driver returned from the store. If the engine was running and the car was in neutral it could not move unless it was put in reverse, and this could not be done without the depressing of the clutch and shifting gears. There is nothing to show that either defendant Santini or defendant Anania did this. If the car was in neutral, whether the engine was running or not, it could roll if the hand brake was released and the car was on an incline. But there is no proof as to topography and slope offered on behalf of the plaintiffs.

This court cannot guess, speculate or determine what made the car move. This must be determined at the trial with more complete proof.

The motion by the plaintiffs for summary judgment against the defendants Anania and Santini is denied.

Order signed.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 31           CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
                    TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Colin Binny, President (Chief Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer
of Amaru, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of, Amaru, Inc. (the
"Company" or "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant, as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us
by others within Company, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's first fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls, which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date: August 17, 2004              /s/ Colin Binny
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Colin Binny, President and Chief
                                   Financial Officer
# C_2008272EN.01000702.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/7

---

Action brought on 9 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-307/08)

(2008/C 272/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, since it does not prevent double taxation of dividends paid by undertakings domiciled in another Member State or EEA/EFTA State to natural persons, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC and Article 40 of the European Economic Area Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, since it does not prevent double taxation of dividends paid by undertakings domiciled in another Member State or EEA/EFTA State to natural persons, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC and Article 40 of the European Economic Area Agreement;

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action, the Commission submits that Belgian tax legislation creates an unjustified restriction on the free movement of capital inasmuch as it taxes dividends payment to natural persons by companies established in another Member State or in a State of the European Economic Area (‘incoming’ dividends) in the same way as dividends paid by companies established in Belgium (‘internal’ dividends), without taking into account taxation at source paid in the State from which the dividends originate. Such legislation penalises cross-border capital transactions since it dissuades individual taxpayers from investing in shares in foreign companies and at the same time it constitutes an obstacle to the accumulation of capital in Belgium for companies having their registered office in other Member States.

---
# C_2009006EN.01001806.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 October 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Hungary

(Case C-270/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 6/36)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
# C_2010011EN.01002001.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-531/08) (1)

1

2010/C 11/36

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
1 

### Schaffner, Karen S.

From: Schaffner, Karen S. Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:31 AM To: 'Paul Siler' Cc: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov Subject: RE: RTR MVL: revised coordinates for TransMontaigne Ft Lauderdale FL

Good Morning, Paul: Thank you for your input on co ordinates. The best approach may be to use actual Gasoline VRU coordinates for those specific records, and use the facility centroid for the ST records. I will make the revisions to the data set, and the TransMontaigne data set will be f inal. Thanks, Karen

Gasoline VRU: Lat 26.094145 and Long -80.128705

Facility centroid: Lat 26.094231 and Long -80.1286 51

From: Paul Siler [mailto:PSiler@transmontaigne.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:44 PM
To: Schaffner, Karen S. Cc: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov Subject: RE: RTR MVL: revised coordinates for TransMontaign e Ft Lauderdale FL

Hello Karen,

It appears that the RTI Centroid and gasoline VRU a re very close together (approximately 34 feet). Th e API coordinate is approximately 200 feet to the East. If the HAP emi ssions from all sources at the Gasoline Distributio n Bulk Terminal are being combined and modeled as once source, I believ e the centroid would be the most appropriate.

Please let me know if you have additional questions

.

Sincerely,

Paul Siler, P.E. Air Quality Compliance Manager

TransMontaigne 1670 Broadway, Suite 3100
P.O. box 5660 Denver, CO 80217-5660

From: Schaffner, Karen S. [mailto:ksschaffner@rti.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:12 AM
To: Paul Siler Cc: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov Subject: RTR MVL: revised coordinates for TransMontaigne Ft Lauderdale FL

Hi Paul: As we discussed, I wanted to review the a ppropriate coordinates to use for non-MTVLO emissio n sources at the TransMontaigne Ft. Lauderdale FL facility, in the r evised 2005 NEI data file. Please confirm which of the following are appropriate to use, or if other coordinates would b e best, indicate those and explain why. Thanks, Ka ren2 API recommended use of (determined coordinate value s based on Figure 1 of their letter): Lat 26.09411 7 and Long -

80.128091.

Facility centroid, based on RTI GIS value, is at ap prox: Lat 26.094231 and Long -80.128651.

During our discussion, you noted the Gasoline VRU i s at approx: Lat 26.094145 and Long -80.128705

Karen Schaffner Air Quality Engineering Group RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Rd (800 Park, C311) Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 phone: (919) 316 3740 fax: (919) 541 7155
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of TransCommunity Financial Corporation, respectively, certify that, to the best of each such individuals knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TransCommunity Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



| |     |                                    
| | --- | -----------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Bruce B. Nolte                 
| |     | Bruce B. Nolte                     
| |     | President & Chief Executive Officer







| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ Patrick J. Tewell  
| |     | Patrick J. Tewell      
| |     | Chief Financial Officer



Dated: May 15, 2008
# C_2008327EN.01002102.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 23 October 2008 — Alstom Power Hydro v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-472/08)

(2008/C 327/37)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alstom Power Hydro

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant:

Question referred

On a proper construction of Article 18(4) of Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977, is it contrary to that provision for domestic legislation to lay down a limitation period of three years for the exercise of the right to recover sums of VAT overpaid (the difference between output tax and deductible input tax)?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---