alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



EXHIBIT 32.2



I, Jack R. Lazar, the chief financial officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 10, 2004



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jack R. Lazar                           
|Jack R. Lazar                               
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4565 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4565

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers to private cemeteries 
             for graves of certain veterans of World War I.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2017

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers to private cemeteries 
             for graves of certain veterans of World War I.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUESTS BY PRIVATE CEMETERIES FOR HEADSTONES OR MARKERS FOR 
              GRAVES OF CERTAIN VETERANS OF WORLD WAR I.

    Section 2306(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(6)(A) If the Secretary is unable to identify any next of kin of 
a deceased individual described in subparagraph (B), a private cemetery 
may request the Secretary to furnish--
            ``(i) a headstone or marker for the grave of the deceased 
        individual pursuant to paragraph (1); or
            ``(ii) a medallion or other device to signify the deceased 
        individual's status as a veteran pursuant to paragraph (4).
    ``(B) A deceased individual described in this subparagraph is an 
individual who--
            ``(i) served in the Armed Forces during World War I; and
            ``(ii) is eligible for a headstone or marker furnished 
        under paragraph (1) (or would be so eligible but for the date 
        of the death of the individual).''.
                                 <all>
```
Answers to RIA Questions From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney,

Below are the answers to the two questions from Amanda Lee on the call with OMB on Tuesday.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

1. What are the sources of CO2 reductions? Do these reductions consider any emission increases associated with operating emission control technologies?

Answer: The CO2 emission reductions of approximately 15 million metric tons annually for the MATS rule are generated using the Integrated Planning Model. The small (1%) decrease in CO2 emissions estimated for the MATS rule results largely from the change in dispatch -- we are projecting a 1% decrease in coal generation and a 3% increase in gas generation. Even within the coal generation fleet, there are likely some modest generation shifts away from the least efficient units towards units that are more efficient to operate. This IPM modeling factors in parasitic load of control technologies, so these CO2 reductions are indeed net of any CO2 emission increases associated with the energy usage of control technologies.

2. Asked about the inclusion of 2012-2014 CAFE standards.Answer: Because there are no emission changes for mobile sources as a result of the rule, the base case and control case are identical for this category of sources. This results in a net emission change of 0. For this reason, the inclusion of the later model year CAFE standards would have no impact on the emission changes, costs, or benefits presented in the

RIA.

For reference, the modeling is based on MOVES2010a, which incorporates new car and light truck greenhouse gas emissions standards affecting model years 2012-and-later (published May 7, 2010) and updates effects of corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards affecting model years 2008-2011. MOVES2010a includes reductions in greenhouse gases associated with those standards in future calendar years, and small reductions in refueling and sulfur-related emissions associated with the reductions in vehicle fuel consumption.
EXHIBIT 32.2 -- Section 906 Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the"Report"), I, James E. Dixon, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.

James E. Dixon, Jr.
#### Montalvo v. Lapez; Montalvo v. Makekau

16913

11/29/94

Denied

77 Hawai'i 282, 884 P.2d 345
# C_2011173EN.01001502.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/15

---

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2011 — Quantum v OHIM — Quantum (Q Quantum CORPORATION)

(Case T-31/08) (1)

1

2011/C 173/32

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
# C_2008247EN.01000901.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 17 July 2008 — Olympique Lyonnais v Olivier Bernard, Newcastle United FC

(Case C-325/08)

(2008/C 247/15)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Olympique Lyonnais

Applicant:

Defendants: Olivier Bernard, Newcastle United FC

Defendants:

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the principle of the freedom of movement for workers laid down in [Article 39 EC] preclude a provision of national law pursuant to which an espoir player who at the end of his training period signs a professional player's contract with a club of another Member State of the European Union may be ordered to pay damages? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the principle of the freedom of movement for workers laid down in [Article 39 EC] preclude a provision of national law pursuant to which an espoir player who at the end of his training period signs a professional player's contract with a club of another Member State of the European Union may be ordered to pay damages?

espoir

| 2. | If so, does the need to encourage the recruitment and training of young professional players constitute a legitimate objective or an overriding reason in the general interest capable of justifying such a restriction? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, does the need to encourage the recruitment and training of young professional players constitute a legitimate objective or an overriding reason in the general interest capable of justifying such a restriction?

---
# City of Lexington - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission Executive Director Bonnie Riedesel Email &#x63;&#x73;&#x70;&#100;&#99;&#64;c&#x73;&#x70;&#x64;&#99;&#46;or&#x67;The post Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Description of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. 
  
 Description of Annual Bonus Plan 
  
 ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains an annual bonus plan for the benefit of its corporate officers and certain other employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries. Bonuses are specified as a percentage of the employee’s annual base salary. Bonus percentages generally are set by job classification level within the Company, except that bonus percentages for the most senior
executive officers of the Company are established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 
  
 The Compensation Committee establishes annual target bonus awards based on the achievement of the financial and operating objectives set by the
Compensation Committee for the Company. Typically, and except as may be provided in the employment and retention agreements of the Company’s most senior executives, 100% of annual bonuses payable to senior executives under the business plan are
tied to the Company’s achievement of revenue, EBITDA (cash flow) and capital budget targets. Bonuses for other executives and employees are determined based on varying percentages of annual base salary, tied to individual and departmental
performance. Company performance (measured against targets set for senior executives) plays a factor in determining all bonus awards. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to modify the foregoing percentage for senior executive officers as
it deems appropriate, subject to compliance with applicable employment and retention agreements of the Company’s most senior executives.
#### In the Matter of Patricia O. et al. Commissioner of the Orange County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Patricia K., Appellant.

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the parental rights of Patricia K., the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), entered September 10, 1990, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On July 26, 1989, the mother, whose inability to care for her children stemmed from chronic alcoholism, admitted to permanent neglect of her two children who, except for one brief period in 1986, had been in foster care since 1984. Pursuant to a settlement worked out between the mother and the Orange County Department of Social Services, the Family Court suspended entry of an order terminating the mother’s parental rights conditioned, *inter alia,*upon the mother remaining drug and alcohol-free, submitting to urinalysis testing when asked, attending at least 90% of scheduled alcohol therapy sessions, and undergoing any treatments suggested by the therapist. The Family Court clearly indicated to the mother that if she did not follow the conditions set forth, her parental rights would be automatically terminated.

By order to show cause dated February 27, 1990, the Orange County Department of Social Services moved to lift suspension of the entry of an order terminating the mother’s parental rights, alleging that she had violated the conditions imposed. The court subsequently conducted a hearing at which the evidence showed that the mother had failed to abide by any of the above conditions without sufficient excuse. By order entered September 10, 1990, the court found that the mother had violated the conditions and permanently terminated her parental rights.

Contrary to the mother’s contentions on appeal, we find that it was unnecessary, under the circumstances of this case, *871to conduct a further dispositional hearing. A few months earlier, the court had already considered the best interests of the children when it suspended entry of an order and indicated to the mother that if she failed to comply with certain conditions her parental rights would be terminated *(see,*Family Ct Act §§ 623, 631; 22 NYCRR 205.50 [d] [4]). We further find that it was unnecessary in this case for the court to determine whether the agency had exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship. While ordinarily such a determination is necessary prior to a finding of permanent neglect *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368), in this case, the mother admitted to permanent neglect.

We disagree with the mother’s contention that the Family Court improperly denied her motion for an adjournment of a portion of the hearing since the record fails to demonstrate any "good cause shown” for an adjournment *(see,*Family Ct Act § 626). Upon a review of the record, we find the mother’s remaining contentions lack merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4555 

To authorize the participation in overseas interagency counterterrorism task 

forces of personnel of the Department of Homeland Security, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2017 

Mr. RUTHERFORD (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. GALLAGHER, 

Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. KATKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To authorize the participation in overseas interagency 

counterterrorism task forces of personnel of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS Interagency 

5 Counterterrorism Task Force Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4555 IH

1 SEC. 2. OVERSEAS INTERAGENCY COUNTERTERRORISM 

2 TASK FORCE PARTICIPATION. 

3 Section 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

4 (6 U.S.C. 112) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsections: 

6 ‘‘(h) COORDINATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL DE7 PARTMENTS AND AGENCIES OVERSEAS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

9 to assign Department personnel to participate in 

10 overseas interagency counterterrorism task forces 

11 to— 

12 ‘‘(A) facilitate the sharing of counterter13 rorism information; and 

14 ‘‘(B) combat the threat of terrorism and 

15 associated risks to the United States stemming 

16 from overseas sources of conflict or terrorism, 

17 as determined by the Secretary. 

18 ‘‘(2) PERSONNEL.—In carrying out this sub19 section, the Secretary may assign personnel from 

20 any component of the Department the Secretary de21 termines necessary to participate in the overseas 

22 counterterrorism task forces referred to in para23 graph (1).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
# Congressional Affairs - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Guy Land Congressional Liaison Specialist.The post Guy Land appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00405-CV

FRANK MILLER, Appellant

V.

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC, Appellee

Appeal from the 270th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012-75468).

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 13, 

2014. Appellant, Frank Miller, did not timely file a brief. After being notified that this 

appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want 

of prosecution.

The Court orders that the appellant, Frank Miller, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered November 10, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and 

Lloyd.
**Exhibit      13.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December                31,                2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully                complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents,                in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                operations of SQM. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Ricardo Ramos R.                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                Ricardo Ramos R.                                                                       |
| Title:                Chief Financial Officer and Business Development Senior Vice                President |
| Date:                June 27, 2008                                                                          |

----
# C_2008183EN.01003502.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/35

---

Action brought on 28 May 2008 — Bouillez and Others v Council

(Case F-53/08)

(2008/C 183/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Vincent Bouillez (Overijse. Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority not to promote the applicants to grade AST 7 for the 2007 promotion exercise.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of the appointing authority not to promote the applicants to grade AST 7 for the 2007 promotion exercise (2007 session) and, in so far as it is possible, the decisions to promote to that grade, for the same promotion exercise, the officials whose names appear in the list of promotions published in Staff Note No 136/07 of 16 July 2007 and who were performing duties at a lower level of responsibility than theirs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the appointing authority not to promote the applicants to grade AST 7 for the 2007 promotion exercise (2007 session) and, in so far as it is possible, the decisions to promote to that grade, for the same promotion exercise, the officials whose names appear in the list of promotions published in Staff Note No 136/07 of 16 July 2007 and who were performing duties at a lower level of responsibility than theirs;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 455 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 455

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 501 East Court Street in 
Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``R. Jess 
Brown United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``R. Jess Brown 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 455

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.
```
#### HOLLOWAY et al. v. DAVIS et al.

No. 34455.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 15, 1953.

R. E. Stephenson, Sapulpa, for plaintiffs in error.

E. C. McMichael, Sapulpa, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed before the decision in the case of Stephenson v. Bonney (Mobley v. Stephenson), 202 Okl. 549, 216 P.2d 315, and the points involved in this appeal are identical with the points raised in that case. The opinion promulgated in that case is applicable to this appeal and the opinion in that case is hereby adopted as the opinion in this appeal.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HALLEY, C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, and WILLIAMS, j J., concur.

ARNOLD, J., concurs in conclusion.

¡BLACKBIRD, J.,

dissents.

This Court acknowledges the services of Attorneys John T. Gibson, Harvey E. Allen and John H. Poe, who as special masters aided in the preparation of this opinion. These attorneys were recommended by the Oklahoma Bar Association, approved by the Judicial Council, and appointed by the Court
19510

#### State v. Flores

April 17, 1997

Order No. 97-43

Vacated in part, Affirmed in part