alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4406 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4406

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, as the ``Tuskegee Airman 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2017

Mr. Espaillat (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Collins of New 
York, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Donovan, Mr. Engel, Mr. Faso, Mr. Higgins of New 
 York, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Katko, Mr. King of New York, Mrs. Lowey, Mrs. 
 Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, 
 Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Reed, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. 
   Serrano, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. 
 Suozzi, Ms. Stefanik, and Ms. Tenney) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, as the ``Tuskegee Airman 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tuskegee Airman Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tuskegee 
Airman Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    Our audits included the financial statement schedule of Biocircuits
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
    We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-48296, No. 33-50642, No. 33-64066, No. 33-89006, No.
333-07447 and No. 333-21257) pertaining to the Employee's Stock Purchase Plan,
the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the Dual Stock Option Plan and
the Written Compensation Contract of Biocircuits Corporation and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-13673, No. 333-19797 and No.
333-26079) and the related Prospectuses, of our report dated January 13, 1997
with respect to the financial statements of Biocircuits Corporation included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1996, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Biocircuits
Corporation.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
August 8, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad E. Herr, Chief Financial Officer of Temporary Financial Services, Inc.
(the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       October 31,  2005

/s/Brad E. Herr
--------------------------------------------------------
Brad E. Herr
Chief Financial Officer


                                 10-QSB Page 18
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement (Bodenman)



 Exhibit 10.13 
  
 Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement 
  
 Reference is made to the Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of March 18, 2002 between American Seafoods Group
LLC and Brad Bodenman (the “Employment Agreement”). 
  
 The parties hereto agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of March 25, 2005: 
  
 Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “3. Compensation. 
  
 (b) Bonus. In addition to Base Salary, Executive may receive an annual
bonus of an amount to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, taking into consideration individual and corporate performance. Further, Executive shall be entitled to receive with respect to each fiscal year during the Employment Term a
nondiscretionary bonus if the EBITDA (as defined on Schedule I hereto) of Parent and its subsidiaries in such fiscal year exceeds certain targets. The amount and calculation of such bonus are described with particularity on Schedule I hereto. In no
event will (i) the nondiscretionary bonus be payable if at the time of payment or at any time during the year of measurement the Company was in default under any credit agreement relating to indebtedness for borrowed money or (ii) the annual bonus
(including discretionary and nondiscretionary portions thereof) in any year exceed 300% of Executive’s Base Salary. The annual bonus with respect to any year, if any, shall be paid within 30 days after the receipt by the Board of audited
financial statements for Parent and its subsidiaries for the pertinent year.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of March 29, 2005. 
  

			
	AMERICAN SEAFOODS GROUP LLC:
		
	By:	 	/s/    BERNT O. BODAL         
	Name:	 	Bernt O. Bodal
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/    BRAD
BODENMAN

	 Brad Bodenman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1998 FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909121
<NAME>              GALESBURG REAL ESTATE
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,689
<PP&E>                                          25,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,421
<SALES>                                         31,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5419]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Reed’s, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, James Linesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   May
      13, 2009/s/ James LineschJames
      Linesch

                Chief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)






A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# C_2010288EN.01003302.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Now Pharm v Commission

(Case T-74/08) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Orphan Designation Procedure - Request for designation of the medicinal product ‘Chelidonii radix special liquid extract’ (‘Ukrain’) as an orphan medicinal product - Commission decision refusing designation as an orphan medicinal product)

(2010/C 288/63)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Now Pharm AG (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: initially C. Kaletta and I.-J. Tegebauer and subsequently C. Kaletta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima and M. Šimerdová, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 6132, of 4 December 2007 refusing the designation of the medicinal product ‘Chelidonii radix special liquid extract’ as an orphan medicinal product under Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (OJ 2000 L 18, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Now Pharm AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Now Pharm AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Cruz, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a *213judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered May 3, 1988, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It is well settled that a claim that a jury verdict is repugnant is not preserved for appellate review unless an objection is raised before the jurors are discharged, at which time it is still possible to resubmit the matter to them *(People v Alfaro,*66 NY2d 985, 987; *People v Hill,*161 AD2d 728). Because the defendant did not raise a claim of repugnancy prior to the discharge of the jury, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review.

In any event, the defendant’s claim of repugnancy is without merit. Viewing the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury *(see, People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 7), we find that the jury may have found the defendant guilty of assault in the second degree while concluding that he was not guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second or third degrees *(see, People v Garcia,*52 NY2d 716, *affg*72 AD2d 356; *People v Hudson,*163 AD2d 418). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Deaton and * From the 48th District Court

Deaton Law Firm, LLC, of Tarrant County,

 Trial Court No. 048-283747-16.

Vs. No. 11-23-00126-CV * August 21, 2024

Law Offices of Steven M. Johnson, P.C., * Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against John Deaton and Deaton Law Firm, LLC.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated March 14, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Landry’s Restaurants, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid reports in the Registration Statements of Landry’s Restaurants, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-75886 relating to the Company’s shelf registration statement) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-104175 relating to the Company’s 2002Employee/Rainforest Conversion Plan and the Company’s 2002 and 2001 Employee Agreements, 333-93173 relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 1995 Flexible Incentive Plan, 333-02862 relating to the Company’s Stock Option Plan,333-02854 relating to the Company’s 1995 Flexible Spending Plan, 333-81007 relating to the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan, and 333-76500 relating to the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors). 

 

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Houston, Texas

March 14, 2005
# C_2010011EN.01001102.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/11

---

Order of the Court of 1 October 2009 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-552/08P P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Customs Code - Article 220(2)(b) - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Waiver of subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties - Notice to importers - Good faith)

2010/C 11/19

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH (represented by: O. Wenzlaff, Rechtsanwält)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Schønberg, agent and B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwält)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2008 in Case T-51/07 Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission, by which the Court dismissed the action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C (2006) 5789 final of 4 December 2006 finding that post-clearance recovery of a part of the import duty not demanded from the applicant in respect of the import of sugar from Croatia should be effected — Good faith of the person liable to duty precluded if the Commission has published a notice to importers — Incorrect assessment of the effect which the subsequent confirmation of the authenticity and accuracy of the certificates of origin by the customs authorities of the State of export has on the criterion of good faith

Agrar-Invest-Tatschl

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
# Adair - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. Executive Director Waylon Wright Email way&#108;&#111;&#110;&#x40;&#x6c;&#x63;&#x61;&#x64;&#x64;&#46;or&#103;The post Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4441 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to prohibit certain waivers and 

exemptions from emergency preparedness and response and security regulations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2017 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to prohibit certain 

waivers and exemptions from emergency preparedness 

and response and security regulations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe and Secure De5 commissioning Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4441 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN WAIVERS AND EXEMP2 TIONS. 

3 Chapter 19 of title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 

4 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2015 et seq.) is amended by inserting 

5 after section 276 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 277. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN WAIVERS AND EX7 EMPTIONS. 

8 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 ‘‘(1) COVERED REGULATION.—The term ‘cov10 ered regulation’ means— 

11 ‘‘(A) an emergency preparedness or re12 sponse regulation or requirement; or 

13 ‘‘(B) a security regulation or requirement 

14 applicable to spent nuclear fuel. 

15 ‘‘(2) LICENSEE.—The term ‘licensee’ has the 

16 meaning given the term in section 50.2 of title 10, 

17 Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regu18 lation). 

19 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN WAIVERS AND EX20 EMPTIONS.—Subject to subsection (c), the Commission 

21 shall not approve the request of a licensee for a waiver 

22 of, or exemption from, a covered regulation applicable to 

23 a civilian nuclear power reactor that has permanently 

24 ceased to operate. 

25 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to 

26 a civilian nuclear power reactor described in that subVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:41 Nov 22, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4441.IH H4441

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4441 IH

1 section at which all spent nuclear fuel has been transferred 

2 to spent nuclear fuel dry casks.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5715]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                   August 3, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Bill Flores to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Heriberto AVILES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30019.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 18, 2005.

Howard Cobb Parker, Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca L. Hudsmith, Federal Public Defender, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Heriberto Aviles, Jr., a federal prisoner (# 69269-079), appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of assaulting a fellow inmate with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3).

Aviles argues that his sentence is illegal under *Booker*because it was imposed pur*465suant to a mandatory application of the sentencing guidelines. In the district court, Aviles objected under *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), to sentencing increases based on the career-offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, and that U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 was itself “unconstitutional.” This second allegation effectively raises the type of error raised by the other respondent in *Booker,*Ducan Fanfan, i.e., that imposition of a sentence pursuant to a mandatory Guidelines regime violated his rights. *See Booker,*125 S.Ct. at 750, 768-69; *United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, (5th Cir.2005). The Government concedes that it cannot show harmless error as to Aviles’s “Fanfan”-type claim. Because the Government admits that it cannot show that the district court would not have sentenced Aviles differently under an advisory Guidelines system, *see United States v. Akpan,*407 F.3d 360, 377 (5th Cir.2005), we REMAND for the district court to decide if resentencing is warranted.

REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.