alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1443]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      STATEMENT OF INTRODUCTION, RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CENSUS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. CAROLYN B. MALONEY

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mrs. MALONEY. Mr. Speaker, today I am proud to be introducing a 
resolution supporting the importance of census surveys and the data 
they produce. Special thanks to Senator John Rockefeller for his 
leadership on the issue and for introducing the Senate companion, and 
to the House original cosponsors, Reps. Michael Honda, Judy Chu, Keith 
Ellison, John Olver, Betty McCollum, Jose Serrano, Laura Richardson, 
Earl Blumenauer, Fortney Stark, John Lewis, and Barney Frank, for their 
strong support of census surveys.
  Since our founding, Congress has recognized the value of census 
surveys to inform policymaking and measure our country's progress. By 
including this modern invention in our Constitution, the founders 
turned a survey into a tool of political empowerment. The decennial 
census is the basis for fair representation and fair distribution of 
hundreds of billions of dollars in federal aid. In recent times, the 
information is used by the public and private sectors for planning 
purposes and to better understand the needs of communities.
  The statistics gathered through the Census Bureau give politicians, 
researchers, urban planners, educators, and other interested Americans, 
a regular and measurable snapshot of the growth and the socio-economic 
status of our Nation. Census programs like the American Community 
Survey and the Economic Census provide vital data to federal, state, 
and local governments, to all sectors and industries, and to all 
geographic areas across the country--from rural to urban to suburban 
neighborhoods.
  These surveys are a fundamental building block for how our country 
measures itself; the value of these statistics cannot be 
underestimated. They let us know how we are doing as a nation, 
identifying areas where we could grow, where we could be more 
economically efficient, and how best to compete globally. I urge my 
colleagues to support this resolution.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1268]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            DAVID CARPENTER

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 18, 2012

  Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride and 
pleasure that I rise today to recognize the outstanding service of 
David Carpenter on the occasion of his retirement after 14 years of 
service as President and CEO of North Kansas City hospital.
  David arrived at North Kansas City hospital in 1999. Before coming to 
the great state of Missouri, David served as administrator for 
Scottsdale Healthcare in Scottsdale, Arizona. He was also President and 
CEO of Hadley Regional Medical Center in Hays, Kansas.
  David's accomplishments exceed those of many in his industry. He was 
named Northlander of the Year by the Northland Regional Chamber of 
Commerce, and was a recipient of the Missouri Hospital Association 
Visionary Leadership Award.
  David has been a great leader to both the staff and patients at North 
Kansas City Hospital. He built a positive work environment for his 
employees and worked toward making the hospital more patient-focused, 
effectively creating a better experience for all. He leaves the 
hospital with a strong foundation as a top ranked facility in Missouri. 
David is a shining example of what it means to be a leader--not only 
for the hospital, but for our entire community.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join with me in commending David 
Carpenter for his dedicated service to North Kansas City Hospital. I 
know that his family, friends and colleagues join me in wishing David 
and his wife all the best in Arizona. I'm confident that he will 
continue to carry on the values that have made him such an outstanding 
leader in the northland.

                          ____________________
```
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman First Class RODNEY L. EYSTER

United States Air Force

ACM S32166

11 March 2014

Sentence adjudged 7 June 2013 by SP CM convened at Joint Base Andrews

, M aryland . Military Judge: Michael A. Lewis (sitting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 100 days, and

reduction to E

- 1

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Major Lucy H. Carrillo

.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Don M. Christensen

.

Before

HARNEY

, WEBER , and PELOQUIN

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occ urred. Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

Accor dingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
# C_2010051EN.01002801.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 12 November 2009 — Commission for the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-548/08) (1)

1

2010/C 51/46

Language of the case: Swedish

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.

1

---
# C_2008272EN.01005101.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/51

---

Action brought on 22 August 2008 — N v Parliament

(Case F-71/08)

(2008/C 272/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: N (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the staff report on the applicant for the period from 16 August 2006 to 31 December 2006.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 12 September 2007 confirming and definitively approving the staff report on the applicant for the period from 16 August 2006 to 31 December 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 12 September 2007 confirming and definitively approving the staff report on the applicant for the period from 16 August 2006 to 31 December 2006;

| — | annul that contested report; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul that contested report;

| — | annul the decision of the President of the Parliament of 22 May 2008 rejecting the applicant's claim for annulment of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the President of the Parliament of 22 May 2008 rejecting the applicant's claim for annulment of the contested decision;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 May 2009 – Commission v Luxembourg**

**(Case C‐390/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Decision No 280/2004/EC – Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol – National measures intended to limit and/or reduce greenhouse gas emissions – Failure to communicate the information required

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to communicate, within the prescribed period, the information required by Article 3(2) of Decision No 280/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 concerning a mechanism for monitoring Community greenhouse gas emissions and for implementing the Kyoto Protocol (OJ 2004 L 49, p. 1), read in conjunction with Articles 8 to 11 of Commission Decision No 2005/166/EC of 10 February 2005 laying down rules implementing Decision No 280/2004/EC (OJ 2005 L 55, p. 57) – Information relating to national projections concerning greenhouse gas emissions and measures adopted to limit and/or reduce such emissions. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to communicate, by 15 March 2007, the information required under Article 3(2) of Decision No 280/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 concerning a mechanism for monitoring Community greenhouse gas emissions and for implementing the Kyoto Protocol, read in conjunction with Articles 8 to 11 of Commission Decision No 2005/166/EC of 10 February 2005 laying down rules implementing Decision No 280/2004/EC, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: November 12, 2008

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ JOSEPH AZZATA      
| |     | JOSEPH AZZATA          
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 917 

Congratulating The Optical Society on its 100th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. DEFAZIO) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science, 

Space, and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating The Optical Society on its 100th anniversary. 

Whereas The Optical Society is the leading global professional association in optics and photonics, supporting research and collaboration in the science of light; 

Whereas The Optical Society was founded in 1916 in Rochester, New York, as the research catalyst for the science 

of light and has since become the leading voice for advancing the study and application of optics and 

photonics; 

Whereas today, The Optical Society connects 270,000 scientists, students, engineers, and business leaders around 

the world spanning 177 countries; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 917 IH 

Whereas over the course of The Optical Society’s 100-year 

history, 34 society members have been awarded the Nobel 

Prize in Physics, Chemistry, or Physiology/Medicine; 

Whereas optics and photonics is the science and application 

of light, serving as the backbone for modern national security applications, industrial controls, telecommunications, advanced manufacturing, health care, and consumer and business products; 

Whereas a 2012 National Research Council study, Optics and 

Photonics: Essential Technologies for our Nation, outlined the utility of optics and photonics and their role in 

facilitating economic growth, recognizing their extraordinary impact on communications, information processing 

and data storage, defense and national security, energy, 

health and medicine, advanced manufacturing, and strategic materials; 

Whereas Congress has recognized the importance of optics 

and photonics in the House-passed Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4435) and the 

Revitalize American Manufacturing Initiative (Public 

Law 113–235); 

Whereas the United States Government has recognized the 

importance of photonics, its contributions to economic development, and the benefits of public-private partnerships, by recently announcing a consortium working with 

the Department of Defense that is known as the American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics 

(AIM Photonics); and 

Whereas optics and photonics create more than 

$3,000,000,000,000 in revenue annually in the United 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 917 IH 

States and support upwards of 7,400,000 jobs: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates The Optical Society on its 

3 100th year anniversary; 

4 (2) reaffirms the crucial role optics and 

5 photonics has played over the last 100 years and 

6 continues to play in the Nation’s economy and every7 day lives; and 

8 (3) recognizes the importance of continued in9 vestment in fundamental optics and photonics re10 search. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.47


 





Authorization License for Usage of Trademark


 


	Trademark:   	


Licensor: China Electric Equipment Group
Co., Ltd.


Address: 88 Shengtai Road, Jiangning Economic
& Technical Development District, Nanjing


Postcode: 21000


Tel.: +86-25-83275358


Country: People’s Republic of China


Sub-license (yes or no): No


 


Licensee: China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co.,
Ltd.


Address: 88, Shengtai Road, Jiangning Economic
& Technical Development District, Nanjing


Postcode: 211100


Tel.: +86-25-52766699


Country: People’s Republic of China


 


Agent Name: China Trademark & Patent
Law Office Co., Ltd.


Effective Date of the License Contract:
February 9, 2006


Expiration Date for the License Contract:
February 9, 2026


Trademark Registration Number: 4707914-16,
4707924-29, 4707931-43, 4707947-53


Class: 2-7, 11-14, 16-22, 24-25, 27-30,
32-33, 36, 38, 40, 42, 43


License Purpose: for ordinary business
of China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.


 


	Licenser’s seal (Seal) (signature):	 Licensee’s seal (Seal) (signature):
	 	 
	/s/ China Electric Equipment Group Co., Ltd.	/s/ China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.


 


Notes:


 


		1.	License of joint owned trademark shall be applied by a representative delegated by the co-owners,
and this action shall be deemed as authorized by other co-owners.



 


		2.	The sub-licensor who applies for registration shall fill in the corresponding information of licensor,
and shall remark in the volume of the sub-license.



 


		3.	This Trademark is still at the application stage, the Trademark is owned by China Electric Equipment
Group Co., Ltd., after duly registration of the Trademark, this Agreement shall still be effective.
# C_2008107EN.01001803.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 18 February 2008 — Extradition proceedings against Szymon Kozlowski

(Case C-66/08)

(2008/C 107/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart

Party to the main proceedings

Szymon Kozlowski

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the following facts preclude the assumption that a person is a ‘resident’ of or is ‘staying’ in a Member State in the sense of Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1):






  (a) | his stay in the Member State concerned has not been uninterrupted; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Do the following facts preclude the assumption that a person is a ‘resident’ of or is ‘staying’ in a Member State in the sense of Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1):

1

(a)

his stay in the Member State concerned has not been uninterrupted;

| (b) | his stay there does not comply with the law on residence; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

his stay there does not comply with the law on residence;

| (c) | he commits crimes there systematically for financial gain; and/or |
| --- | --- |

(c)

he commits crimes there systematically for financial gain; and/or

| (d) | he is in custody serving a criminal sentence there? |
| --- | --- |

(d)

he is in custody serving a criminal sentence there?

| 2. | Is transposition of Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA in such a way that the extradition of a State's own nationals against their will for the purpose of execution of sentence is always impermissible, whereas extradition of nationals of other Member States against their will can be authorised at the discretion of the authorities, compatible with Union law, in particular with the principles of non-discrimination and Union citizenship under Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (EU) in conjunction with Articles 12 and 17 et seq. of the EC Treaty (EC) and, if so, are those principles at least to be taken into account in the exercise of that discretion? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is transposition of Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA in such a way that the extradition of a State's own nationals against their will for the purpose of execution of sentence is always impermissible, whereas extradition of nationals of other Member States against their will can be authorised at the discretion of the authorities, compatible with Union law, in particular with the principles of non-discrimination and Union citizenship under Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (EU) in conjunction with Articles 12 and 17 et seq. of the EC Treaty (EC) and, if so, are those principles at least to be taken into account in the exercise of that discretion?

et seq

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Woodward, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), all rendered June 13, 1986, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts; one each as to Indictment Nos. 802/84, 803/84 and 2112/86), and bail jumping in the first degree (two counts; one each as to Indictment Nos. 667/86 and 668/86), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Victoria Z. Carlton, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
3rd day of May, 2004.



/s/ Victoria Z. Carlton
-------------------------------
Victoria Z. Carlton
Treasurer and Secretary
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.
# Hancock - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Region 11–Brooke-Hancock Regional Planning and Development Council Executive Director Mike Paprocki Email m&#105;&#107;&#x65;&#x70;a&#112;&#64;&#x62;&#x68;&#x6a;m&#112;&#99;&#x2e;&#x6f;rgThe post Region 11–Brooke-Hancock Regional Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008197EN.01001601.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/16

---

Action brought on 16 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-256/08)

(2008/C 197/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. O'Reilly and M. Condou-Durande, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted or, in any event, by failing to notify those provisions to it, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted or, in any event, by failing to notify those provisions to it, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 10 October 2006

---

(1)  OJ L 304, p. 12.

1

---
LOOK FOR SPOTTED LANTERNFLIES BEFORE LEAVING.

STOP. SCRAPE. 

SQUASH.

aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slfbiz