alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
(A) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET @ MARCH 31, 1997, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997; AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      14,275,870
<SECURITIES>                                10,053,769
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,339,138
<PP&E>                                       3,810,988
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,626,284)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,762,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,791,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,629
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,296,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,762,505
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,654,717
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,036,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,402,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,402,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,402,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009180EN.01003602.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 April 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-106/08) (1)

1

2009/C 180/63

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 24.5.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1422-E1423]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA BASEBALL

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. RON BARBER

                               of arizona

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. BARBER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to praise and celebrate the 
achievements of the University of Arizona baseball team, which has been 
selected for induction into the University of Arizona Sports Hall of 
Fame.
  This honor is extremely well deserved.
  Earlier this summer, the UA Wildcats were crowned national champions 
after winning the College World Series in Omaha for the fourth time.
  The Wildcats won the title by beating the South Carolina Gamecocks 4 
to 1.
  This was the Wildcats' year. They won all 10 of their postseason 
games--going through the regionals, the super regionals and the College 
World Series without a loss. In those 10 games, they outscored their 
opponents 88 to 28.
  I want to especially make note of the play of Robert Refsnyder, the 
right fielder for the Wildcats, who was named the most valuable player 
of the 2012 College World Series.
  I also want to praise the work of Head Coach Andy Lopez. He 
previously won a national title as coach of Pepperdine University, and 
this is the first of what we expect to be many titles with the 
University of Arizona.
  The decisions Mr. Lopez made throughout the College World Series were 
crucial in Arizona's success. I'm sure he has more national titles in 
his future at Arizona.

[[Page E1423]]

  Congratulations to these latest inductees into the University of 
Arizona Hall of Fame.
  As a UA alumnus, I am proud of my alma mater on many levels and I am 
thrilled to say, well done, Cats, for this incredible season. Continue 
to ``Bear Down Arizona!''

                          ____________________
```
Flint Creek Environmental Controls Costs

10/21/11 - Rev.4

$/Year $/Year

2.2 O&M

Variable $6.62

$4.19

Fixed $4.21

Total O&M $15.02

NID
# C_2008223EN.01005804.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/58

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 June 2008 — Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-87/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/105)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32


                               1350 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting Reform and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted), Mark E. Jones,
III,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer (and principal financial officer) of Jaguar
Resources  Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

     The  Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31,
2005,  to  which  this  Certification  is  attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and the information
contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  of  the  Company  at  the end of the period covered by the
Periodic  Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered
by  the  Periodic  Report



Dated:  May 1, 2005                                       /s/ Mark E. Jones, III
                                                          ----------------------
                                                              Mark E. Jones, III
                       Chief Executive Officer (and principal financial officer)






<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company
Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Han Zhihao, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: June 25, 2008



By:

/S/    HAN ZHIHAOName:

Han ZhihaoTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Joseph J. Rodelli et al., Petitioners, against John J. Burns et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

April 14, 1959.

*Rosario J. Renda*for petitioners.

*Elmer S. Lane*for respondents.

Frank A. Gulotta, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding to review the determination of the Town Board of Oyster Bay in denying petitioner’s application for a permit to maintain a real estate office in his home.

At the time petitioner originally made his application, this was a permitted use, when allowed as a special exception by the Town Board. (See art. 5, § C-l, sub. 8a of the Building Zone Ordinance.)

After a public hearing held on November 18, 1958, the application was denied in an undated decision which forms part of the return.

This proceeding was originally made returnable on February 6, 1959 and then adjourned successively to February 19, February 26 and finally to March 18, when it was submitted to this court for decision. Two of these adjournments, it is said, were requested by petitioner and one by respondent, though which is which, does not appear.

In any event it is conceded that on March 17, 1959, this very section of the ordinance was amended so as to eliminate the provision on which petitioner bases his case.

The court accords no weight to the contention that the Town Board acts as a legislative body in these matters, and this is beyond the reach of judicial review. *(Matter of Frantellizzi*v. *Herman,*1 A D 2d 980.) However it is well settled that no one *563can acquire a vested interest under an ordinance unless he first procures a permit under it and then changes his position in reliance upon the permit. *(Rice*v. *Van Vranken, 225*App. Div. 179, affd. 255 N. Y. 541.) And it has been held that it makes no difference that the municipality may have deliberately delayed action on an application, so that it might have time to change the ordinance. *Matter of Atlas*v. *Dick*(192 Misc. 843, revd. 275 App. Div. 670, affd. 299 N. Y. 654) though under a dicta expressed in *Matter of Dubow*v. *Ross*(254 App. Div. 706) the result might be different where the municipality practices a deception on petitioner to accomplish its aims.

Therefore on this record, the merits of petitioner’s original application are not before the court and the application must be denied as a matter of law on the authority of the above ease.

Short-form order signed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1396]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            INTRODUCING TRANSPARENCY FOR LETHAL CONTROL ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. SUSAN A. DAVIS

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce the 
Transparency for Lethal Control Act (TLC), legislation requiring the 
United States Department of Agriculture to publish clear and accessible 
information on animals killed through the Wildlife Services program of 
the Animal Health and Inspection Service.
  The Wildlife Services program is responsible for intervening in 
situations when an animal is considered a threat or serious nuisance to 
humans. In some cases, animals are killed to fulfill this mission.
  Efforts to gather adequate information regarding Wildlife Services 
operations have been difficult. The USDA has not made detailed data 
available to the public relating to where, why, how, and which animals 
have been killed. This lack of transparency and public reporting makes 
oversight impossible. The USDA could be acting inappropriately or 
recklessly and without this data, we can't know. That is why I am 
introducing legislation to require the USDA to publish kill data online 
by state, county (or other similar political subdivision), and 
municipality.
  The killing of animals should not be a routine or reflexive 
government response. It should only be undertaken, if at all, after 
careful deliberation and under strict supervision. For that reason, the 
public and Congress need to have the opportunity for vigorous oversight 
to ensure that the USDA is acting appropriately and considering all 
cheaper and more humane alternatives.
  Congress must improve oversight of the Wildlife Services program and 
ensure that the USDA is using tax dollars efficiently and 
appropriately. I urge passage of the Transparency for Lethal Control 
Act (TLC).

                          ____________________
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *954Karl W. Hunt, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered March 30, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant’s only contention on appeal is that County Court failed to take into consideration his rehabilitative needs and efforts when it sentenced him to 1 to 4 years’ imprisonment upon his plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI). The record reveals that defendant has a lengthy criminal record, including one conviction for driving while ability impaired and two other convictions for DWI. In fact, his last DWI conviction, which resulted in a term of probation and the revocation of his license, was only two months prior to the incident leading to this conviction. In addition, one person died and another person was seriously injured as a result of defendant’s actions here. Finally, a review of County Court’s remarks during sentencing clearly indicates that the court considered all relevant factors in imposing sentence. Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that County Court abused its discretion in imposing sentence *(see, People v Miller,*163 AD2d 627, 629, *lv denied*76 NY2d 942; *People v Brown,*160 AD2d 1037, 1038, *lv denied*76 NY2d 785; *People v Aia,*105 AD2d 592).

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at December  31, 1996 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000908532
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              15,490
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                           345
<INVENTORY>                                          1,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,584
<PP&E>                                             201,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                      28,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     223,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,892
<BONDS>                                            181,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               16,430
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                29
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       223,718
<SALES>                                            161,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   174,234
<CGS>                                               65,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       65,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    69,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       194
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                            69
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .15



</TABLE>
# C_2008223EN.01003703.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/37

---

Action brought on 14 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-313/08)

(2008/C 223/61)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Vesco and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 1(4), (5) and (6) of Directive 2003/58/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 amending Council Directive 68/151/EEC, as regards disclosure requirements in respect of certain types of companies or, in any event, by failing to communicate such provision to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 1(4), (5) and (6) of Directive 2003/58/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 amending Council Directive 68/151/EEC, as regards disclosure requirements in respect of certain types of companies or, in any event, by failing to communicate such provision to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 30 December 2006.

---

(1)   OJ 2006 L 221, p. 13.

1

---
# Marion - Appalachian Regional Commission

- TEAMing Up: A Regional Partnership Story This story is one of several "Stories of Change" highlighted in a new evaluation of ARC's POWER Initiative. The post TEAMing Up: A Regional Partnership Story appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 6–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Sheena Hunt Email &#x72;&#101;g&#x69;&#111;n&#x76;&#105;&#64;&#x72;&#101;g&#x69;&#111;n&#x76;&#x69;&#46;&#x63;&#x6f;&#109;The post Region 6–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norma Robles, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered October 10, 1989, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that she was deprived of her right to a fair trial due to improper and prejudicial remarks by the prosecutor during his summation *(see, People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105; *People v Jackson,*143 AD2d 363). However, no objections were made to several of the statements now complained of, and therefore, the defendant’s claims of error with respect thereto are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). Other allegedly improper statements were made in fair response to comments by defense counsel during his summation *(see, People v Sykes,*151 AD2d 523). As to the remaining statements at issue, the court gave the jury proper curative instructions. When the trial is viewed in its totality, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# C_2009019EN.01001603.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/16

---

Action brought on 11 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-487/08)

(2009/C 19/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal and I. Martinez del Peral Cagigal)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Kingdom of Spain

Defendant(s):

Form of order sought

| — | A declaration that, by giving different treatment to dividends distributed to foreign and domestic shareholders, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

—

A declaration that, by giving different treatment to dividends distributed to foreign and domestic shareholders, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement.

| — | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Under the Spanish legislation, companies which have a substantial holding in the capital of a branch may deduct from their taxable income 100 % of the gross dividend received from that holding. In order to enjoy this facility, parent companies resident in Spain must have had a holding of at least 5 % of the capital of the resident branch of the company for an uninterrupted period of at least one year. Dividends which qualify for the application of that facility are exempt from deduction at source.

In order to enjoy that exemption, parent companies not resident in Spain were required to have a holding of 20 %, which was reduced to 15 % from 1 January 2007 and will be reduced to 10 % from 1 January 2009. Thus, unlike parent companies resident in Spain, parent companies from other Member States of the EC and Member States party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area which have a holding in the capital of at least 5 % but lower than the limits mentioned have to pay tax in respect of the dividends paid by the branch.

The Commission takes the view that by imposing a requirement of a larger holding in the capital for parent companies which are not resident than is imposed on resident companies in order to enjoy the exemption from tax for dividends distributed by the branches in Spain the difference in treatment under the Spanish legislation constitutes discrimination contrary to Article 56 EC and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement. The Commission can see no justification for this additional fiscal burden which falls on parent companies from other Member States and the Member States of the EEA.

---