alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00707-CV

CARISSA TARVER, Appellant

V.

4441 ALMA ROAD, LLC DBA CUBESMART 5408 AND GAYLA 

GUNDERSON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 471-02271-2019

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this appeal from the trial court’s orders granting 

appellees’ motions for summary judgment failed to include a copy of appellee 

4441 Alma Road, LLC dba Cubesmart 5408’s motion for summary judgment. 

After filing individual opening briefs as to each appellee, appellant moved to have 

the clerk’s record supplemented with a copy of the motion along with a copy of the 

video “submitted as summary judgment evidence.” We granted the motion, 

ordered the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record, and provided that 
appellant could file amended opening briefs citing to the supplemental record 

within fifteen days of the record being filed.

In accordance with our order, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental record 

containing a copy of the summary judgment motion. In a separate filing, the trial 

court clerk stated no exhibit was attached to the motion for summary judgment. 

She noted, however, that appellant had attached “a PDF document with an 

embedded video” to an email sent to the trial court, but the document and video

were “never presented as an exhibit or evidence during a hearing” and were “never 

made a part of the court’s record.”

Based on the trial court clerk’s filings, it appears the record is complete. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to file any amended opening briefs citing to the 

supplemental clerk’s record no later than November 12, 2020. Appellees’ 

responsive briefs shall be filed no later than December 14, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
#### Raymond Napier, Plaintiff, *v.*City of New York, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

September 3, 1959.

*Alvin L. Korngold*for plaintiff.

*Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel,*for defendant.

J. Irwin Shapiro, J.

Motion for an order to examine the defendant, the City of New York, before trial and for a discovery and inspection of certain documents.

The complaint alleges *inter alia*that two certain police officers while “ engaged and on duty as police officers of the defendant, *534City of New York * * * one or both of the said police officers wilfully and maliciously and without any just cause, provocation or consent of plaintiff, assaulted and beat plaintiff violently * * * inflicting upon plaintiff serious personal-injuries ” and that *“*said assaults were brought on by defendant’s employees while in the active discharge of their official duties for defendant and while on defendant’s business.” Thus the basis of the recovery here sought is an assault upon the plaintiff. The complaint is not predicated on any theory that the city was negligent in the original hiring of the two police officers or in their subsequent continuance as such. Under such circumstances *1 ‘*the personal records and history of the police officers involved in said arrest and assault ’ ’ are neither germane nor relevant to plaintiff’s cause of action. Item 1 of the examination sought is, therefore, allowed with the exception of the above-quoted phraseology.

For the same reason the request for the production of “ the personal records of the Police Officers * * * from the date of their admission to the Police Department to the date of the arrest ” is likewise denied, but the balance of item 2 is allowed even though it requires defendant to produce ‘ *‘*the police blotter records made in the course of the arrest ” and *“*the notebooks of both police officers with their notes concerning this arrest. ’ ’ The police blotter is, and the police notebooks are in the nature of, a public record and no reason occurs to the court as to why the city should not make them available for assistance in the conduct of the examination before trial and for the limitation of the issues to be litigated herein.

Motion granted as indicated. Settle order.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D791]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR TUESDAY,

                             JULY 31, 2012

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)

                                 Senate

  Committee on Appropriations: Subcommittee on Department of 
Defense, business meeting to markup proposed budget estimates for 
fiscal year 2013 for the Department of Defense, 10:30 a.m., SD-192.
  Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: business 
meeting to consider pending calendar business, 2:30 p.m., SR-253.
  Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: to hold hearings to 
examine S. 3385, to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to use 
designated funding to pay for construction of authorized rural water 
projects, 10 a.m., SD-366.
  Committee on Foreign Relations: to hold hearings to examine the 
nominations of James B. Cunningham, of New York, to be Ambassador to 
the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, and Richard G. Olson, of New 
Mexico, to be Ambassador to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, both 
of the Department of State, 10 a.m., SD-419.
  Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere, Peace Corps and Global 
Narcotics Affairs, to hold hearings to examine doing business in 
Latin America, focusing on positive trends but serious challenges, 2 
p.m., SD-419.
  Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: 
Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal 
Workforce, and the District of Columbia, to hold hearings to examine 
the state of Federal privacy and data security law, 10 a.m., SD-628.
  Select Committee on Intelligence: to hold closed hearings to 
examine certain intelligence matters, 2:30 p.m., SH-219.
```
# C_2009069EN.01001702.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/17

---

Appeal brought on 18 November 2008 by Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA against the judgment delivered on 9 September 2008 in Case T-224/08 Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-498/08 P)

(2009/C 69/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA (represented by: M. Salvi, L. de Nora, M. Manganiello, P. Rivetta, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the order of 9 September 2008 of the Court of First Instance in Case T-224/08, notified by fax of 12 September 2008 and refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for judgment on the merits; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order of 9 September 2008 of the Court of First Instance in Case T-224/08, notified by fax of 12 September 2008 and refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for judgment on the merits;

| — | In the alternative, in the event that the case is not referred back to the Court of First Instance, uphold the forms of order sought by the applicant at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, in the event that the case is not referred back to the Court of First Instance, uphold the forms of order sought by the applicant at first instance;

| — | In any event, order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

In any event, order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Incorrect legal assumptions, incorrect reasons for judgment, incorrect application of the legal rule in question, failure to make inquiries (fifth paragraph of Article 230 EC, Article 249 EC and Article 254 EC, also in relation to Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4248 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 430
115th CONGRESS
   2d Session
                                H. R. 4248

                          [Report No. 115-570]

    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain 
  disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2017

 Mr. Huizenga introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

                           February 20, 2018

      Additional sponsors: Mr. Hollingsworth and Mr. Sensenbrenner

                           February 20, 2018

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain 
  disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other 
                               purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CONFLICT MINERAL REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (p) of section 13 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 1502; and
            (2) in the table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act, 
        by striking the item relating to section 1502.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 430

115th CONGRESS

   2d Session

                               H. R. 4248

                          [Report No. 115-570]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain 
  disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 20, 2018

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Castelle (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott C. McDonald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:


        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.





              /s/ Scott C. McDonald
         Name:    Scott C. McDonald
         Title:   Chief Executive Officer

         Date:    March 29, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Castelle and will be retained by Castelle and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       39
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0074 SAT Date: 11/9/2012 Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 3.30 (E) S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.66 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the moieties. Moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.3 aliphatic amine SAR daphnid 48-h LC50 0.21 aliphatic amine SAR green algal 96-h EC50 0.078 amide SAR fish

_ chronic value 0.012 amide SAR daphnid

_ chronic value 0.023 aliphatic amine SAR

algal

_ chronic value 0.038 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; liquid; log Kow = 5.15 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide Ecotox Category N oneEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM SYKES, a/k/a Black,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00350-LMB-3)

Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 19, 2023

Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Sykes, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7064 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

William Sykes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse 

of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining 

steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7064 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of Murdock Communications Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-K  for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eugene I. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

                                                   /s/  Eugene I. Davis
                                                --------------------------------
                                                  Eugene  I.  Davis
                                                  Chief  Executive  Officer
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)
                                                  April 15,  2003


This  Certification  is  made  solely  for  purposes  of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject  to  the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein, and not for any other
purpose.

A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and  furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  request.  This written statement shall not be deemed to be "filed" as part
of  the  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  that  it  accompanies.
# C_2019246EN.01004902.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/49

---

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Bizbike and Hartmobile v Commission

(Case T-426/18) (1)

(2019/C 246/50)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition, has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.

---
|     |  |             
|---- |  | ------------
|LOGO |  | Exhibit 13.2



2004 FORM 20-F



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 28, 2005 |  |  |  | LOGO  
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Robert D. J. Davies    
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|                          |     |                                                      |  | 
|------------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                          |     |                                                     
|Date:  September 25, 2008 | By: | /s/ C. Brett Burford                                 | 
|                          |     | C. Brett Burford                                     | 
|                          |     | Chief Financial OfficerCraftmade International, Inc. | 
|
Exhibit 11.1
                                                       
                                                       
               GENERAL NUTRITION COMPANIES, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES 
                    Computation of Net Earnings Per Share   
                   (in thousands except per share amounts)
                                                       
                                                       
                                      12 Weeks     12 Weeks
                                       Ended        Ended
                                     April 25,    April 26,
                                        1998         1997
                                                            
Net earnings available for common              
  shares                             $  30,238    $  23,859
                                                            
Basic weighted average common           82,424       81,129
  shares
                                                  
Basic earnings per share             $    0.37    $    0.29

Basic weighted average common shares    82,424       81,129
Outstanding options                      2,276        1,834
Diluted weighted average                84,700       82,963
  common shares
                                                            
Diluted earnings per share          $     0.36    $    0.29
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                             573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                       636
<INVENTORY>                                     22,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,749
<PP&E>                                          69,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,299
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,691
<SALES>                                        128,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,322
<CGS>                                          109,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (702)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   233
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>