alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 515 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of civic education and civic involvement programs in the elementary 

and secondary schools of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2015 

Mr. ROSS (for himself and Ms. GRAHAM) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of civic education and civic involvement programs in the elementary and secondary schools 

of the United States. 

Whereas civic education, democratic engagement, governmental and constitutional knowledge, and social service in 

the United States are on the decline; 

Whereas in past decades, civic education was a prominent 

component of the curriculum in our Nation’s schools; and 

Whereas the advancement of civic education, democratic engagement, governmental and constitutional knowledge, 

and social service are essential for the future health and 

welfare of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 515 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) civic education, democratic engagement, 

4 governmental and constitutional knowledge, and so5 cial service are necessary to motivate and inspire fu6 ture leaders of the United States; 

7 (2) elementary and secondary schools in the 

8 United States are encouraged to offer courses pro9 moting civic education, democratic engagement, gov10 ernmental and constitutional knowledge, and social 

11 service such as civics, government, economics, geog12 raphy, history, and American history; 

13 (3) elementary and secondary schools in the 

14 United States are encouraged to integrate civic edu15 cation, democratic engagement, governmental and 

16 constitutional knowledge, and social service in elec17 tives such as art, English language arts, music, 

18 mathematics, and science; 

19 (4) in order to measure students’ basic civic 

20 knowledge, secondary schools in the United States 

21 are encouraged to administer a test to seniors based 

22 on the official list of 100 civics questions and an23 swers published and used by the Secretary of Home24 land Security for purposes of administering the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 515 IH 

1 civics test component of naturalization examinations; 

2 and 

3 (5) elementary and secondary schools in the 

4 United States are encouraged to promote civic par5 ticipation and social service, at Federal, State, and 

6 local levels, and encourage such participation from 

7 students and families. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7185

CHARLES FREDERICK CRAWLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-326-AM)

Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: April 19, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Frederick Crawley, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore

Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Crawley v. Angelone, No. CA-95-326-AM (E.D. Va. July 12, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2610

RALPH DEMENTRI RANSOM, Doctor,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-667-A)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Dementri Ransom, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Ransom appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer, the United States Navy, in

his employment discrimination action. Ransom contended that he was

retaliated against because of his prior complaints of racial discrimination, when the Navy investigated his involvement in a minor

car accident. Ransom fails to show that he suffered any adverse

employment action, as required to support a claim of retaliation

under Title VII. See Carter v. Ball, 33 F.3d 450, 460 (4th Cir.

1993). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q (the "Report") of Amaru,
Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chua Leong Hin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Chua Leong Hin
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2010
# C_2008142EN.01004001.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/40

---

Action brought on 21 March 2008 — Schell v Commission

(Case F-36/08)

(2008/C 142/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Arno Schell (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 and annulment of his 2007 promotion report.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 and annul his 2007 promotion report; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 and annul his 2007 promotion report;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Willis, Bumgardner and Senior Judge Overton 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

ARTIS ORLANDO McDONALD 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 0679-99-2 JUDGE RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III 

 MAY 16, 2000 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND 

Ernest P. Gates, Judge Designate 

 Elwood Earl Sanders, Jr., Appellate Defender 

(S. Jane Chittom, Appellate Counsel; Public 

Defender Commission, on briefs), for 

appellant. 

 Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney 

General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General; 

Leah A. Darron, Assistant Attorney General, 

on brief), for appellee. 

 

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code 

§ 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.

A jury convicted the defendant of malicious wounding and 

use of a firearm in the commission of malicious wounding. On 

appeal, the defendant claims the circuit court lacked 

jurisdiction because the Commonwealth failed to serve notice of 

the proceeding in the juvenile and domestic relations district 

court upon his father as required by former Code §§ 16.1-263 and 

-264. We conclude the trial court had jurisdiction and affirm 

the convictions. 
Petitions charging the offenses were filed in the juvenile 

and domestic relations district court. The offense date was 

January 10, 1997. The juvenile and domestic relations district 

court found probable cause and certified the charges. The grand 

jury indicted the defendant, and the circuit court tried the 

defendant with a jury, which convicted. 

Moore v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 405, 410, __ S.E.2d __, __ 

(2000), held that Code § 16.1-269.1(E) cured a defect in a 

juvenile court proceeding resulting from failure to notify the 

defendant's father of the proceedings pursuant to Code 

§§ 16.1-263 and -264. Code § 16.1-269.1(E) applies to offenses 

committed after July 1, 1996. This offense occurred after that 

date, and a grand jury indicted the defendant. Accordingly, the 

indictment cured any defect that occurred, and we affirm the 

convictions. 

 Affirmed.

- 2 -
March 17, 2015 Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Office of Aviation analysis U.S. Department

of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. Washington,
DC 20590 Re: Continuation

of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Adak, Alaska Docket DOT

-OST-2000-8556 Dear Mr. Kevin Schlemmer:

ADAK TELEpHONE UTILITY ADAK CABLEVISION WINDYCITYBROADBAND WINDYCITYCELLULAR This letter
is to express strong supportfor the selection of Alaska Airlines (or "Alaska") tocontinue to provide essential air service tothe community
of Adak, Alaska. Alaska's jet service

is critically important tothe economic wellbeing
of our community

. The 737 or737-400 combination ("combi") passengerand cargoaircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes tocontinue using onthis route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet carrier simply cannot provide

.Both the 737 and the 737-400 combi aircraft

is equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which enables the airline to reliably accessthe airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. Alaska Airline service provides Adak Telephone Utility and its affiliate companies with security that their equipment and materials are going toreach Adak. Alaska Airline also provides Adak passengerswith the benefit of expedited and seamless on-line connections
tomost major cities in the **"low~r**48," via the airline's Anchorage hub. All of these jet service capabilities arecritical to the successofthe Adak community

in maintaining and growing our economy.Alaska Airlines has a long history of air service throughout the stateof Alaska and tothe Adak community. We respectfully urgethe Department
toselect Alaska Airlines tocontinue to provide essential air service tothe Adak community. Larry Mayes President/CEO Adak Telephone Utility 1410 Rudakof Circle Anchorage, Alaska 99508
# C_2009141EN.01003405.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/34

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 5 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-269/08) (1)

1

2009/C 141/65

Language of the case: Maltese

Language of the case: Maltese

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 197, 2.8.2008.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4486 

To amend section 1908 of title 41, United States Code, to exempt certain 

contracts from the periodic inflation adjustments to an acquisition-related 

dollar threshold. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2017 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 1908 of title 41, United States Code, 

to exempt certain contracts from the periodic inflation 

adjustments to an acquisition-related dollar threshold. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4486 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS FROM 

2 THE PERIODIC INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS TO 

3 THE ACQUISITION-RELATED DOLLAR 

4 THRESHOLD. 

5 Subparagraph (B) of section 1908(b)(2) of title 41, 

6 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘3131 to 

7 3134,’’ after ‘‘sections’’. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
# C_2009220EN.01001601.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/16

---

Order of the Court of 30 April 2009 — Japan Tobacco, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Torrefacção Camelo Lda

da

(Case C-136/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(5) - Detrimental to the distinctive character of the earlier mark - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark - Likelihood - Application for registration of the figurative sign ‘CAMELO’ as a Community trade mark - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word and figurative marks CAMEL)

2009/C 220/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Japan Tobacco, Inc. (represented by: A. Ortiz López, S. Ferrandis González and E. Ochoa Santamaría, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent), Torrefacçao Camelo Lda

Other parties to the proceedings:

da

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment in Case T-128/06 Japan Tobacco v OHIM and Torrefacçao Camelo by which the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) dismissed the action brought by Japan Tobacco for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 February 2006 in opposition proceedings between Japan Tobacco and Torrefacçao Camelo — Infringement of Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) — Relative grounds for refusal to register a trade mark — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character of an earlier trade mark, or detrimental to that distinctive character

Japan Tobacco

OHIM and Torrefacçao Camelo

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Japan Tobacco, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Japan Tobacco, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with Amendment No. 1 of the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher J. Reed, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 Dated:           August 18, 2009
 
 
 /s/ Christopher J. Reed
 Christopher J. Reed
 Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010209EN.01003601.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — CM Capital Markets v OHIM — Carbon Capital Markets (CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS Emissions Compliance Solutions & Carbon Finance)

(Case T-490/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark CARBON CAPITAL MARKETS Emissions Compliance Solutions & Carbon Finance - Earlier Community and national figurative marks CM Capital Markets - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 209/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CM Capital Markets Holding, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: T. Villate Consonni and J. Calderón Chavero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. F. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Carbon Capital Markets Ltd (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Hardcastle, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2008 (Case R 16/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between CM Capital Markets Holding, SA and Carbon Capital Markets Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders CM Capital Markets Holding, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CM Capital Markets Holding, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Raghavan Rajaji, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge of Manugistics Group, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Manugistics Group, Inc. Dated: May 13, 2004
    By:
    /s/
Raghavan RajajiRaghavan RajajiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Manugistics Group, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manugistics
Group, Inc. and will be retained by Manugistics Group, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128002 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128002 COA: 255166 Oakland CC: 2000-171857-FC RICHARD H. THOMSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 16, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William M. Caldwell, IV, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(5)   The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | /s/ WILLIAM M. CALDWELL, IVWilliam M. Caldwell, IV
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks