alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019255EN.01003701.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Rietze v EUIPO — Volkswagen (Motor vehicle VW Caddy)

(Case T-192/18) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Registered Community design representing the motor vehicle VW Caddy - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Informed user - Different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Burden of proof on the applicant for a declaration of invalidity - Requirements relating to the reproduction of an earlier design)

(2019/C 255/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rietze GmbH & Co. KG (Altdorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Klawitter, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2018 (Case R 1244/2016-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Rietze and Volkswagen.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Rietze GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Rietze GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:04 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Subject: Redlined version of Tier 3 FRM FRN EO12866 2060-AQ86

Attachments: Tier 3 Preamble- redline for OMB 2-25-2014 .doc; Tier 3 Fuels Regs- redline for OMB 

2-25-14.doc; Combined vehicle regs 02 25 2014.docx

Attached please find a redlined version of the Tier 3 FRM (preamble, vehicle regs, fuels regs). 

I’ll send the RIA in a separate Email
#### Luequeen Williams et al., Respondents, *v.*Jarnot Ardisson Co., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

September 25, 1959.

*Zipser S Levitt (Sidney N. Zipser*of counsel), for appellant.

*W. Frederick Peniston*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiffs failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that they have a meritorious cause of action. *(Lunghino*v. *Marine Trust Co. of*Buffalo, 163 Misc. 765; *Rothschild*v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.)

The order should be unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to defendant and motion to open plaintiffs’ default and to restore case to calendar denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
# C_2008092EN.01002202.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/22

---

Action brought on 20 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-72/08)

(2008/C 92/42)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Vidal Puig and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the safety of third-country aircraft using Community airports (1) or, in any event, not informing the Commission thereof, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the safety of third-country aircraft using Community airports (1) or, in any event, not informing the Commission thereof, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2004/36/EC expired on 30 April 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 76.

1

---
October 19, 2015

Mr. William J. Tweedy

103 Los Santos Court

Vallejo, CA 94590

Dear Mr. Tweedy :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on July 21, 2015, and filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3074 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any furthe r, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/ind ex.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the informat ion, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
# C_2010024EN.01004901.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/49

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 December 2009 — Iranian Tobacco v OHIM — AD Bulgartabac (TIR 20 FILTER CIGARETTES)

(Case T-245/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Figurative Community trade mark TIR 20 FILTER CIGARETTES - Interest in bringing proceedings not required - Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 24/85

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iranian Tobacco Co. (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: A. Beckensträter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: AD Bulgartabac Holding Sofia (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: M. Maček, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 April 2008 in Case R 708/2007-1 concerning revocation proceedings between AD Bulgartabac Holding Sofia and Iranian Tobacco Co

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Iranian Tobacco to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Iranian Tobacco to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223 of 30.8.2008

1

---
<Page>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                     INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ibis Technology Corporation:

     The audits referred to in our report dated February 1, 2002, included the
related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, included in the annual report on Form 10-K. The
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-78440) on Form S-3, (No. 333-09237) on Form S-3, (No. 333-82497) on
Form S-3, (No. 333-09239) on Form S-8, (No. 333-81452) on Form S-8, (No.
333-45247) on Form S-8, (No. 333-36706) on Form S-8, and (No. 333-61184)
on Form S-8 of Ibis Technology Corporation of our report dated February 1,
2002, relating to the balance sheets of Ibis Technology Corporation as of
December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ending December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31,
2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Ibis Technology Corporation.

                                             KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2002
# C_2010221EN.01003701.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni v Commission

(Case T-62/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Aid measure put into effect)

2010/C 221/58

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni SpA (Terni, Italy) (represented by: T. Salonico, G. Pellegrino, G. Pellegrino and G. Barone, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and G. Conte, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/408/EC of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ 2008 L 144, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   RECOGNIZING THE SERVICE OF BRINTON W. OVERHOLT, SR. IN THE UNITED 
                              STATES ARMY

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. DAN BURTON

                               of indiana

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 18, 2012

  Mr. BURTON of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, I rise tonight to honor an 
outstanding Hoosier for his patriotism and service during World War II. 
Brinton W. Overholt, Sr., 90-years young this year, served with honor 
in the United States Army from 1944-1946. Trained stateside at Camp 
Blanding, Fort Meade, and finally Camp Shanks; Brinton was eventually 
shipped overseas to support the Allied march liberation of France. 
Landing in Le Havre, France, Brinton was assigned as a casualty 
replacement for the 106th Division, 423rd Battalion, Squad 4 of the 3rd 
Platoon. The 106th Division served with distinction in France; helping 
to trap some 20,000 German soldiers around St. Lazare; a vital 
submarine base near Paris. Of the Division's original compliment of 
1500 soldiers; only 88 would survive the war.
  Shooting the 81 mm mortar, Mr. Overholt served in the Heavy Weapons 
Unit. Later, he would become the squad leader, directing the shots of 
the mortar men. While Overholt was still in France, Nazi Germany 
surrendered; and the 106th Division became part of the United States 
Army of Occupation in Germany.
  The American soldiers moved into German houses and Brinton Overholt 
was assigned the of taking inventory of the household so that if the 
U.S. soldiers broke anything or if something went missing, our 
government would replace it. Brinton was in the midst of an inventory 
when an officer informed him that he was going to be shipped out to the 
Pacific for the invasion of Japan. Fortunately, for Brinton and the 
Japanese, Brinton was granted a 30- day furlough in the U.S., before 
his rotation to Japan and the war would be over before his furlough 
ended.
  Brinton spent the rest of his military career at Camp Campbell in 
Kentucky. (now called Fort Campbell) where he served as a medic's and 
Chaplain's Assistant to special troops. Brinton would in fact serve 
under three different Chaplains over the time he was there--including 
Chaplain John Brown.
  If you ask him about his service during the war, Brinton will tell 
you quite honestly and matter-of-factly, that he doesn't consider 
himself a hero, just a kid who served his country because it was the 
right thing to do. I ask my colleagues to join with me today to honor 
and thank Brinton W. Overholt Sr.; because it is the right thing to do.

                          ____________________
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00085

- CV
Texas Department of Public Safety

v. Jesse Elizarde
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013

- CCL

- 791

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this d ecision certified below for observance.

March 19, 2015
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Patrick J. Tewell, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransCommunity Financial Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2007;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                      |     |                        
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|Date:
August 10, 2007 | By: | /s/  Patrick J. Tewell 
|                      |     | Patrick J. Tewell      
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationPresident and Chief Executive OfficerI, Eddie L. Steiner, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
21.

 
CSB BANCORP, INC. a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: May 11, 2007                                                                           /s/ Eddie L. Steiner   Eddie L. Steiner   President andChief Executive Officer  
22.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1280]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  HONORING SHUNDRARIA RONEISHA TRIBBLE

                                  _____
                                 

                        HON. BENNIE G. THOMPSON

                             of mississippi

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 18, 2012

  Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor a 
remarkable young woman: Shundraria Roneisha Tribble. Shundraria is the 
only daughter of Michelle Tribble of Falcon, Mississippi.
  She graduated as an outstanding scholar of Madison Shannon Plamer 
High School. Throughout her high school career she has remained on the 
Principal and Superintendent Lists. She was a member of the Beta Club, 
the Student Council, and the United States Achievement Academy. 
Shundraria was also elected as Miss Madison Shannon Palmer High School 
2011-2012.
  As a freshman, Shundraria set a goal to graduate in the top ten of 
her senior class, and through hard work and determination she was named 
class Salutatorian on May 12, 2012. Shundraria aspires to enter the 
medical field as a Registered Nurse to later venture on to become a 
physician.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask our colleagues to join me in recognizing Ms. 
Shundraria Roneisha Tribble, Salutatorian for Madison Shannon Palmer 
High School Class of 2012.

                          ____________________
```