alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008209EN.01003501.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/35

---

Action brought on 19 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-266/08)

(2008/C 209/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and E. Adsera Ribera, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Kingdom of Spain, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Council Directive 2004/81/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on the residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities and, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Kingdom of Spain, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Council Directive 2004/81/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on the residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities and, in any event, by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17 of that directive;

1

| — | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time limit for transposition of Directive 2004/81/EC expired on 5 August 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 261, p. 19.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5729]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                               September 10, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Steve Womack to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
# Wayne - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. Executive Director Waylon Wright Email &#119;&#x61;y&#108;&#x6f;&#110;&#x40;l&#99;&#x61;d&#x64;&#x2e;&#111;&#x72;gThe post Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
##### 



Exhibit 10.17
 Asyst Technologies, Inc.
Compensation Program for Non-employee Directors
 Effective July 1, 2003
Amended June 27, 2005
Amended April 3, 2006
Amended April 2, 2007
 Program Element
    
    DescriptionSign-on stock award to new directors for continuing service
    
    Stock award in conjunction with continued service-    $120,000 value at award, vesting over 3 years
from the date of award-    value determined by the trading price of the
Companys Common Stock at the date of award-   shares subject to such award may not be sold
until after the recipient has ceased to be a
board memberBoard member  annual cash retainer
    
    $35,000Lead Non-management Director  annual cash retainer
    
    $7,500Board member  per meeting fees
    
    $2,000 in person, or $1,000 if by telephone (when such
meeting is as the Board)No incremental meeting fees for the Board chair (if a
non-executive chair)Committee member  annual cash retainer Audit
    
     $5,000 Compensation
    
     $5,000 Governance and Nominating
    
     $5,000Committee member  per meeting fees Audit
    
    $1,000 in person, or $500 if by telephone Compensation
    
    (when such meeting is as a committee) Governance and Nominating Specially appointed committees
    
    No incremental meeting fees for the committee chairCommittee chair  annual cash retainer Audit
    
     Audit: $12,500 Compensation
    
     Compensation: $7,500 Governance and Nominating
    
     Governance: $7,500Additional committee fees
    
    $12,500 annual cash retainer for designated Audit
Committee Financial Expert
(unless if also the committee chair)




---



##### 



Program Element
    
    DescriptionAnnual stock award to new and existing
directors for continuing service
    
    Stock award in conjunction with continued service-   $60,000 value, vesting over 36 months from the
date of award-   value determined by the trading price of the
Companys Common Stock at the beginning of the
respective fiscal year-   shares subject to such award may not be sold
during the 36-month period (unless the
recipient has ceased to be a board member)Subsidiary directors Non-management director  annual cash retainer
    
     $5,000 Non-management director  meeting fees
    (board, committee or project)
    
     No additional compensationFees for special projects/meetings U.S.
 Outside U.S.
    
    None (unless specifically approved)
$1,000 per day or $5,000 per assignment out of the
country (as determined by the Board), separate from fees
for meetings conducted during any such Board-related
travel or assignment
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1473]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING NEIL ARMSTRONG

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. ADAM B. SCHIFF

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Mr. SCHIFF. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life and legacy of 
a true American hero, the first human being to walk on the moon, Neil 
Alden Armstrong.
  I had the privilege of meeting Neil Armstrong, and even introduced my 
son Eli to him at an event commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the 
Apollo 11 landing. It has been said that ``we're all dreamers,'' but 
Neil Armstrong inspired generations of Americans to dream big and reach 
for the stars, both literally and figuratively. He believed that the 
yearning to explore is part of what makes us human and his singular 
achievement on July 20, 1969 still inspires.
  A reluctant hero, Mr. Armstrong never used his Apollo 11 achievement 
for personal gain. On more than one occasion he questioned his own 
notoriety, protesting that his walk on the moon was the result of the 
dedication of more than four hundred thousand people from engineers who 
designed the Lunar Module to ground controllers who monitored every 
aspect of the mission, to seamstresses, who stitched by hand the suit 
that kept him alive on the moon.
  The late 1960's was a time of tumult in America, when our nation was 
riven by Vietnam, the struggle for civil rights and the emerging 
women's movement. In the midst of this, Armstrong's climb down the 
lunar module's ladder and his ``giant leap for mankind'' united not 
just Americans, but people of all nations as they watched. That night . 
. . July 20th, 1969, countless children--including a nine-year old boy 
in Framingham, Massachusetts--looked up at the moon and dared to dream.
  Neil Armstrong is no longer with us, but it is a remarkable testament 
that even now--more than four decades after Eagle landed on the Moon--
the mission of Apollo 11 still inspires us and challenges us to press 
forward in the exploration of space.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2010063EN.01004602.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2010 — G-Star Raw Denim v OHIM — ESGW (G Stor)

(Case T-309/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark G Stor - Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks G-STAR and G-STAR RAW DENIM - Relative ground for refusal - Absence of similarity between the marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 63/81

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: G-Star Raw Denim kft (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: G. Vos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis and J. Novais Gonçalves, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ESGW Holdings Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2008 (R 1232/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between G-Star Raw Denim kft and ESGW Holdings Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders G-Star Raw Denim kft to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders G-Star Raw Denim kft to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 11.1
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                  UNIFY CORPORATION
                    STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                     (UNAUDITED)
                                           
                                           
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended Oct. 31,   Six Months Ended Oct.31,   
                                                   ---------------------------   ------------------------
                                                      1997           1996           1997           1996  
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss                                             $ (733)       $(1,576)       $(2,908)       $(1,389)
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
Weighted average shares of common
   stock outstanding                                  8,252          7,917          8,201          3,726
Weighted average shares of redeemable
   preferred stock outstanding  (1)                       -              -              -          3,566
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
                                                      8,252          7,917          8,201          7,292
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------

Net loss per share                                   $(0.09)       $ (0.20)       $ (0.35)        $(0.19)
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
                                                     ------        -------        -------        -------
</TABLE>

--------------------------

(1) Computed using the as-if-converted method.




                                        14
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE0395 7

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# Gallia - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission Executive Director John Hemmings Email &#x6a;&#104;&#101;m&#x6d;&#x69;&#110;g&#x73;&#x40;&#111;v&#x72;&#x64;&#99;&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
SERVED: JUNE 10, 2011 

• -•'•'.RTMEhlTOIU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^F\.)R17\TiON 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

(OPERATION 

j i . ! 3 A il: Ub 

IN THE MATTER OF 

M & R HELICOPTERS, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOSOOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-1211 

OIIDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

In the interest of judicial efficiency, the above-captioned proceeding is reassigned fi^om 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Ronnie A. Yoder to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. 

Goodwin. All fijture pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be 

served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service 

List. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

Ronnie A 

Chief Administrative 
REVISED ' 

ORIGINiM^^ 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC* -rjsHi..^ i ^ 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite'wlr^* 

FAA Docket No. CPlOSOOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Michael B. Selig, MD, FACC, 

Respondent's Representative 

2816 Orefield Road 

Allentown, PA 18104 

TEL: 610-360-3953 

FAX: 

Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel . • 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3357 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ir;«l^:|»:' 

':!K"^m 

i:3f: 

*:tQr, 0/ i 

^>%-

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in pers^ (^jl>y 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avent>c,^S.^; 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430/ 

Hpi courier, use the following actress: Federal 

"V^Hght Building—Suite 2WlbO0, Washington, 

^ ^
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Lichter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Lichter
-------------------------------------
John Lichter
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004


       CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien DuFort, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sebastien DuFort
-------------------------------------
Sebastien DuFort
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5765]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. POE of Texas:
        H.R. 6364.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1, 12, 16, and 18
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONG THANH CHAU,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 70010

Agency No. A042

- 811

- 907

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017 **

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Cong Thanh Chau, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immi gration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reconsider and reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 70010

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to r eopen or reconsider and review de

novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785, 791

- 92 (9th Cir.

2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Chau’s motion to

reconsi der and reopen as untimely, where it was filed fourteen years after his final

order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23( b)(1), and Chau failed to establish any

exception to the filing deadline, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4).

To the extent Chau contends he is eligible for status under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1154(f), t he IJ correctly noted that the grant ing of such status is outside of the

immigration court’ s jurisdiction, s ee 8 U.S.C. § 1154(f)(1) (petition for

classification is to be fil ed with the Attorney General), and the record does not

reflect that Chau has filed such a petition.

To the extent Chau requests prosecutorial discretion, w e lack jurisdiction to

consider that request

. See Vilchiz

- Soto v. Holder

, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir.

2012) (order).

Chau’s remaining contentions , including alleged violations of due process,

equal protection, and international law

, are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 119 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5728]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            PETITIONS, ETC.

  Under clause 3 of rule XII, petitions and papers were laid on the 
clerk's desk and referred as follows:

       52. The SPEAKER presented a petition of The Board of Chosen 
     Freeholders, New Jersey, relative to urging the President to 
     protect Americans' religious liberty; to the Committee on 
     Energy and Commerce.
       53. Also, a petition of the Town of Woodstock, New York, 
     relative to Resolution No. 220-2012 calling the Congress to 
     honor its obligation to the Constitution by affirming the 
     powers given it in Article 1, Section 8; to the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs.
       54. Also, a petition of Office of Management and Budget, 
     Indiana, relative to the state's request for reimbursement in 
     the amount of $130,953,979; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
       55. Also, a petition of City of Miami, Florida, relative to 
     Resolution No. R-12-0241 urging the President and the 
     Congress to abolish Visa requirements for Brazilian tourists 
     seeking to travel to the United States; to the Committee on 
     the Judiciary.
       56. Also, a petition of the City of Lauderdale Lakes, 
     Florida, relative to Resolution No. 2012-78 expressing 
     support for President Barack Obama's use of Executive 
     Authority to implement the DREAM Act; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
       57. Also, a petition of the Philadelphia Bar Association, 
     Pennsylvania, relative to supporting the Violance Against 
     Women Act Reauthorization; jointly to the Committees on the 
     Judiciary, Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, 
     Financial Services, Natural Resources, and the Budget.
```
# Ohio - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Grow Ohio Valley: Empowering Food Access and Entrepreneurs What started as an after-school urban gardening program has since blossomed into Grow Ohio Valley (Grow OV), an operation with around 50 employees working toward a single mission: improve the health and economic future of Wheeling, West Virginia through local food. It&#8217;s a great mission for an organization rooted in West Virginia’s Northern Panhandle. Wheeling [&#8230;]The post Grow Ohio Valley: Empowering Food Access and Entrepreneurs appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 10–Bel-O-Mar Regional Council and Interstate Planning Commission Executive Director Scott Hicks Email &#x62;&#x65;&#x6c;&#111;&#109;ar&#x40;&#x62;&#x65;&#x6c;&#111;&#109;ar&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post Region 10–Bel-O-Mar Regional Council and Interstate Planning Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.