alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21 

LANDRY’S RESTAURANTS, INC. 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES (2007) 

Brenner’s on the Bayou, Inc. 

C. A. Muer Corporation 

Capt. Crab’s Take-Away of 79th Street, Inc. 

CHLN, Inc. 

CHLN-Maryland, Inc. 

Crab House, Inc. 

Cryo Realty Corp. 

FSI Devco, Inc. 

FSI Restaurant Development Limited 

GNL, CORP. 

GNLV, CORP. 

Golden Nugget Experience, LLC 

Golden Nugget, Inc. 

Hospitality Headquarters, Inc. 

Houston Aquarium, Inc. 

I’ll Entertain, Inc. 

Inn at the Ballpark Catering, Inc. 

Island Hospitality, Inc. 

Landry’s Crab Shack, Inc. 

Landry’s Development, Inc. 

Landry’s Downtown Aquarium, Inc. 

Landry’s G.P., Inc.

Landry’s Gaming, Inc. 

Landry’s Harlows, Inc.

Landry’s Limited, Inc. 

Landry’s Management, L.P.

Landry’s Pesce, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood &Steak House - Corpus Christi, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Alabama, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Arlington, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Biloxi, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Colorado, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House -Florida, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Lafayette, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Memphis, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Minnesota, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Missouri, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House -Nevada, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - New Mexico, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - New Orleans, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - North Carolina, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - Ohio, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - SanLuis, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood House - South Carolina, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar - Galveston, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar - Kemah, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar - San Antonio, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar - Sugar Creek, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar II, Inc. 

Landry’s Seafood Inn & Oyster Bar, Inc. 

Landry’s SeafoodKemah, Inc. 

Landry’s Trademark, Inc. 

LCH Acquistion,Inc. 

LCHLN, Inc. 

LGE, Inc. 

LSRI Holdings, Inc. 

Marina Acquisition Corporation of Florida, Inc.

Nashville Aquarium, Inc. 

Nevada Acquisition Corp. 

Ocean Blue Industries, Inc. 

Rainforest Cafe Canada Holdings, Inc.

Rainforest Cafe, Inc. 

Rainforest Cafe, Inc. - BaltimoreCounty 

Rainforest Cafe, Inc. - Cha Cha 

Rainforest Cafe, Inc.– Kansas 

Rainforest Trademark, Inc. 

Saltgrass, Inc.

Seafood Holding Supply, Inc. 

Summit Aircraft Services, Inc.

Summit One Network, Inc. 

Summit Seafood Supply, Inc. 

Summit Supply, Inc. 

TheHofbrau, Inc. 

T-Rex Cafe - Kansas City, Inc. 

T-Rex Cafe -Orlando, Inc. 

T-Rex Café - Reno, Inc. 

T-Rex Cafe, Inc.

West End Seafood, Inc. 

Willie G’s Galveston, Inc.

Willie G’s Post Oak, Inc. 

WSI Fish Limited 

Yorkdale Rainforest Restaurants, Inc.
SERVED NOVEMBER 23, 2010 

• "i^PARTMENT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ! .\N3P0RTATI0N 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS v;AtT OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

m HGV 23 P 2--H2 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TGI FREIGHT 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-1079 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010NM730038) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

snnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Lay^Jj*d^e 

Attachment - Service List 
!«:"Ft.wFAA Docket No. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Rebecca J. Hozubin, Respondent's Counsel 

Wilkerson Hozubin 

310 K Street, Suite 405 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7* Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W10dO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2020255EN.01001501.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — B.D v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON)

(Case T-717/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PHILIBON - Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON - Relative ground for refusal - Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2020/C 255/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: B.D. — Boyer Developpement (Moissac, France) (represented by: É. Junca, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, A. Folliard-Monguiral, H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Philicon-97 AD (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: V. Pavlov and M. Lazarov, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2018 (Case R 375/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Philicon 97 and B. D. — Boyer Developpement.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders B. D. — Boyer Developpement to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders B. D. — Boyer Developpement to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.

---
# C_2011211EN.01002303.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/23

---

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Power-One Italy v Commission

(Case T-489/08) (1)

1

(Action for compensation - Project cofunded by the financial instrument LIFE + - Development of a new system of supplying power for use in mobile telephony (Pneuma project) - Abuse of process - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 211/51

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Power-One Italy SpA (Terranova Bracciolini, Italy) (represented by R.Giuffrida and A. Giussani, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by P. Oliver and D. Recchia, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for compensation for loss allegedly suffered by the applicant following the Commission’s decision to end the Pneuma project (LIFE04 ENV/IT/000595), intended to cofund development of a new system of supplying power for use in mobile telephony.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Power-One Italy SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Power-One Italy SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1

             COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR SPECIAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS

      On May 16, 2005, the Board of Directors of iPayment, Inc. (the "Company")
established a Special Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Special
Committee") to evaluate the non-binding proposal from a newly-formed entity,
wholly-owned by Gregory S. Daily, iPayment's Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, to acquire all of the Company's outstanding shares for a cash price of
$38.00 per share and any alternative transactions. On June 28, 2005, the
compensation to be provided to members of the Special Committee for their
services on the Special Committee was set pursuant to a resolution of the Board
of Directors at (i) $10,000 per month and (ii) $1,000 per meeting attended by a
member in person. In addition, the Chairman of the Special Committee will
receive an additional payment of $25,000 for his time and efforts as the
Chairman of the Special Committee.

      The compensation provided to the Special Committee's members shall
continue, unless the Board of Directors decides otherwise, until a definitive
merger agreement, agreement to sell all the outstanding shares of the Company or
other agreement resulting in a Rule 13e-3 transaction has been entered into.

                                  Page 22 of 26
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Jones, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in admitting as excited utterances the hearsay statements by decedent to police and medical personnel. We disagree. Decedent made those statements shortly after he had been critically wounded by two gunshots. At that time he was in severe pain and lapsing in and out of consciousness. In his statements he repeatedly expressed shock and astonishment at the events. Given those circumstances, Supreme Court correctly concluded that the statements were the result of the startling event, rather than studied reflection, and therefore admissible under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule *(see, People v Brown, 70*NY2d 513, 517-522). Defendant further contends that the tape-recorded conversations, allegedly between decedent and the 911 dispatcher, were inadmissible because the People failed to establish the caller’s identity. Because defendant failed to object to the admission of the tape on that ground, this issue has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, since decedent identified himself on the tape, the approaching police sirens were heard on the tape, and decedent was still on the telephone when found by the police, the People adequately established that decedent was the caller.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5640]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, the Chair 
will postpone further proceedings today on motions to suspend the rules 
on which a recorded vote or the yeas and nays are ordered, or on which 
the vote incurs objection under clause 6 of rule XX.
  Record votes on postponed questions will be taken later.

                          ____________________
```
# Lee - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Kentucky River Area Development District Executive Director Michelle Allen Email &#x6d;&#105;c&#x68;&#101;&#108;&#x6c;&#x65;&#64;k&#x72;&#97;d&#x64;&#x2e;&#111;r&#x67;The post Kentucky River Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Linesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:November 9, 2010




/s/ James Linesch


James Linesch


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)








A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008236EN.01000802.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 30 June 2008 — Société Moteurs Leroy Somer v Société Dalkia France, Société Ace Europe

(Case C-285/08)

(2008/C 236/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Société Moteurs Leroy Somer

Appellant:

Respondents: Société Dalkia France, Société Ace Europe

Respondents:

Question referred

Do Articles 9 and 13 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (1) preclude the interpretation of domestic law or settled domestic case-law such that it enables the victim to seek compensation for damage to an item of property intended for professional use and employed for that use, where that victim simply proves damage, the defect in the product and the causal link between that defect and the damage?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1985 L 210, p. 29.

1

---
# C_2009044EN.01003601.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/36

---

Action brought on 16 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-556/08)

(2009/C 44/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and A.A. Gilly, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to fully comply with Directive 2005/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, or in any event by failing to fully communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to fully comply with Directive 2005/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, or in any event by failing to fully communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order the United Kingdom to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the United Kingdom to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 20 October 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 255, p. 22.

1

---
#### Corning-Painted Post Area School District, Respondent, v Village of Painted Post, Appellant.

— Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Finnerty, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Finnerty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
# C_2008327EN.01002003.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/20

---

Action brought on 29 October 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-465/08)

(2008/C 327/35)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Karanasou-Apostolopoulou and H. Støvlbæk)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2005/36/EC into domestic law expired on 20 October 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 255 of 30.9.2005.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Richard Blumenthal led the Pledge of Allegiance, as 
follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
#### FITZGERALD v. STATE.

No. A-11750.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 15, 1953.

*480Orval Grim, Sayre, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

This prosecution against the defendant Raymond Fitzgerald was commenced in the County Court of Beckham County and is a companion case to the case of Fitzgerald v. State, No. A-11748, Okl.Sup., 256 P.2d 477. By agreement, the case was tried to the court without a jury on the same day the other case was tried and the appeal was lodged herein at the same time.

On appeal, the same two propositions are presented as were presented in the case of Fitzgerald v. State, No. A-11748, supra. Only one brief was filed for both cases. The affidavit for the search warrant was identical in wording to that we discussed in the former case, and our conclusions in that case will apply with equal force to the contentions herein made. We find no errors in the record which would authorize or justify a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment and sentence of the County Court of Beckham County is accordingly affirmed.

' POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Bogen Communications International,  Inc. (formerly European Gateway Acquisition
Corp.) on Form S-1 (No.  33-65294)  and Form S-3 (No.  33-99662)  of our  report
dated March 7, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated  financial statements and
financial statement schedules of Bogen Communications International,  Inc. as of
December  31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period  ended
December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

New York, New York
March 27, 1997
# C_2009205EN.01001101.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-465/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2005/36/EC - Right of establishment - Recognition of professional qualifications - Failure to adopt within the prescribed period)

2009/C 205/18

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Karanasou Apostolopoulou and H. Støvbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Skandalou, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22), which repeals Directive 89/49/EEC (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 327, 20.12.2008.

1

---