# C_2008285EN.01002801.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/28

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 10 September 2008 — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia and Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma

(Case C-393/08)

(2008/C 285/46)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Emanuela Sbarigia

Applicant:

Defendants: Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia and Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma

Defendants:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it compatible with the Community principles upholding freedom of competition and freedom to provide services, laid down inter alia in Articles 49 EC, 81 EC, 82 EC, 83 EC, 84 EC, 85 EC and 86 EC, to impose on pharmacies the abovementioned prohibitions — whereby they are not allowed either to decline to take an annual holiday or to remain open whenever they so desire, beyond the maximum limits at present allowed under the abovementioned provisions of Lazio Regional Law No 26/2002 — and the concomitant additional requirement, under Article 10(2) of that Regional Law, of a prior discretionary assessment by the Administration (carried out in agreement with the bodies and organisations specified in that article) as to the special nature of the municipal area in which the applicant pharmacies are located, as a precondition for obtaining a derogation from those prohibitions within the Municipality of Rome? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with the Community principles upholding freedom of competition and freedom to provide services, laid down inter alia in Articles 49 EC, 81 EC, 82 EC, 83 EC, 84 EC, 85 EC and 86 EC, to impose on pharmacies the abovementioned prohibitions — whereby they are not allowed either to decline to take an annual holiday or to remain open whenever they so desire, beyond the maximum limits at present allowed under the abovementioned provisions of Lazio Regional Law No 26/2002 — and the concomitant additional requirement, under Article 10(2) of that Regional Law, of a prior discretionary assessment by the Administration (carried out in agreement with the bodies and organisations specified in that article) as to the special nature of the municipal area in which the applicant pharmacies are located, as a precondition for obtaining a derogation from those prohibitions within the Municipality of Rome?

| 2. | Is it compatible with Articles 152 EC and 153 EC to impose on the public pharmacy service, albeit with the aim of protecting the health of consumers, conditions — such as those laid down in Regional Law No 26/2002 — limiting or precluding the possibility of extending the daily, weekly or annual opening times of individual pharmacies? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it compatible with Articles 152 EC and 153 EC to impose on the public pharmacy service, albeit with the aim of protecting the health of consumers, conditions — such as those laid down in Regional Law No 26/2002 — limiting or precluding the possibility of extending the daily, weekly or annual opening times of individual pharmacies?

---