alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismiss and Opinion Filed April 23, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 23

- 00981

- CV

ATTE PILARSKI , Appellant

V. HENLEY PROPERTIES , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 23

- 03703

- C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Smith A ppellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to
our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without
a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by March 10, 2024. By
postcard d ated March 12, 2024 , we informed appellant h er brief was overdue and

directed appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure
to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX

.
R. A PP

. P

. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief n or otherwise
corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b),
(c).

230981F.P05 /Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JU STICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ATTE PILARSKI, Appellant

No. 05

- 23

- 00981

- CV V.
HENLEY PROPERTIES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 23

- 03703

- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Miskel and Breedlove participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 23 rd day of April
, 2024

.
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form S-8 (Nos. 33-72656, 333-111747, 333-111748) of our report dated March
      24, 2006, except for the effect of reporting the discontinued operations
      described in Note 3, as to which the date is March 21, 2007, relating to the
      financial statements and financial statement schedule, which is included in
      this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.











PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP


Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


March 28,
      2007
# Barrow - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northeast Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Burke Walker Email &#98;&#119;&#x61;l&#107;&#x65;&#x72;&#64;&#110;&#x65;&#x67;r&#99;&#x2e;&#x6f;r&#103;The post Northeast Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1389]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                RESOLUTION OF DISAGREEMENTS ABOUT CYPRUS

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. VIRGINIA FOXX

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, there is a need to respond to recent comments 
that have been made by some of my colleagues involving issues of 
concern to Cyprus.
  We all agree that a comprehensive and sustainable resolution of 
disagreements about Cyprus is long overdue. Such a solution must allow 
both the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities to participate in all 
aspects of the island's national life and government while respecting 
the rights and political equality of all Cypriots preserved in a 
renewed partnership state.
  Of concern to me are statements by some that Turkish Cypriots, and 
the Republic of Turkey itself, are obstacles to any forward progress.
  Without rehashing the history that brought about the current 
situation on Cyprus, it should be made clear that the Turkish 
government has, on multiple occasions, welcomed the resolution of these 
issues which guarantees the equal rights of the Turkish Cypriot 
community. Turkish Cypriots voted overwhelmingly in favor of the U.N. 
Comprehensive Peace Plan (known as Annan Plan) in 2004, demonstrating 
their sincere desire to move beyond the painful past. Despite this 
genuine determination to incorporate, not only within the life of the 
island, but within the wider European and global communities, the U.N. 
proposal was overwhelmingly rejected by the Greek Cypriot side. 
Incredibly, one week after missing one of the most significant 
opportunities to reach a comprehensive solution to these longstanding 
problems, the Greek Cypriots were awarded with membership in the 
European Union.
  As a result, the Greek Cypriot community, as the Republic of Cyprus, 
now enjoys full membership status in the European Union including all 
associated rights and privileges as well as membership in the wider, 
global community. It is time to end the isolation and embargoes imposed 
upon the Turkish Cypriot community and secure a negotiated political 
settlement, agreed to by both parties, that allows all Cypriots to 
build a common future together.

                          ____________________
```
May 02, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: Amendment to Exemption 11426 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket NO. FAA

-2015

-0173 Dear Sir or Madam: Alaska Aerial Media LLC. was issued an Exemption num bered 11426 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of aerial cinematography and videography, as well as implementation of emergency use UAS systems with public entities. Alaska Aerial Media requests an amendment to the exemption to allow for three (3 ) additional types of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully comply with the conditions of the Exemption. Alaska Aerial Media LLC. wishes to operate the DJI s800 Hexacopter, DJI s1000 Octocopter and the Sensefly eBee RTK fixed wing under th e same conditions contained in the exemption. Attached hereto are the Flight Operations and Procedures Manuals (FOPM) for the three (3) additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for amendment to the Exemption

. Sincerely,
Ryan P. Marlow Alaska Aerial Media 7960 Upper OMalley Road Anchorage Alaska 99507 Tele: (907)

-717

-9794
# C_2010134EN.01000901.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/9

---

Order of the Court of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Portugal)) — Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa v Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional, Bwin International Ltd, formerly Baw International Ltd, Betandwin.Com Interactive Entertainment

(Case C-55/08) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 134/14

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Portugal)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa

Applicant:

Defendant: Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional, Bwin International Ltd, formerly Baw International Ltd, Betandwin.Com Interactive Entertainment

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Interpretation of Articles 43, 49 and 56 EC — National legislation reserving to a particular body the exclusive right to operate games of chance and pool betting and penalising the activity of organising, promoting and collecting (including by Internet) of bets on sporting events — Prohibition on an undertaking based in another Member State operating on line gambling and pool betting from promoting organising and operating such gambling and pool betting by Internet and making the value of the prizes available to winners

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto (Portugal), by decision of 19 December 2007, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
07/07/2014 09:59 8472947498 FAA GLRC



## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office ofHearings Washington, O.C. 

# Regent Aerospace Corporation FAA DOCKETNO. CP*notyet assigned* EIR 2010·GL-11-0030

Civil Penalty Action Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin



## MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND PAGE 02/04

There is currently pending a Motion for Summary Judgment in the matter captioned above filed by the Respondent. The time for the Agency to respond bas not yetrun. However, the Agency Attorney assigned to th.is matterunderwent a medical procedure late last week which included an injection into his leftknee. TheAgency Attorney has suffered a severe reactionto the injection and is currently unable to walk without assistance. It is believedthat this reaction will subside
overthe next three orfour days and he can returnto work.
Th.erefore, the Agency Attorney, Chris G Zurales, does hereby request thatthe time allowed to respond to the Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgmentbe eJ;:tended to Thursday, July 17, 20l4. TheAgency Attorney has discussed this request with counsel for the Respondent, and 

### Mr. Clementhas indicated they have no objection to granting this extension oftime.07/07/2014 09:59 8472947498 FAA GLRC

Respectfully submitted 

### this 

## ih day ofJuly 2014.

Brian Khan for, 

### Chris G. Zurales, 

### Agency Attorney Senior Attorney Federal AviationAdministration GreatLakes Region, AGL-7K 2300 

### East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 600 18 

### Phone: · (847) 294-7713 Fax: (847) 294-7498 Email: chris.g.zuraies@faa.gov PAGE 03/04 

### 207/07/2014 0g:5g FAA GLRC



## Certificate ofService 2010-GL-11-0030 PAGE 04/04 3



### I hereby certify that the fore.!foing Motion To Extend Time to Respond, has been mailed by First Class Mail and Faxed this 

### 7 day ofJuly 2014, to: Original and One Copy: Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilber Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 FAX: 202-493-5142 One Copy

### to each: The Honorable Richard C Goodwin Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Telephone (StaffAssistant): 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536 Mr. John Scott Hoff Jeffrey F Clement HoffLaw Group 135 S LaSalle St, Suite 3300 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: 

### Fax: (312) 346-8111 (312) 853-3924
Dated this 7th 

### day ofJuly 2014.

FAA Great Lakes Region
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                       --------------------------------
                       ANTEC CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
                       --------------------------------




      ANTEC CORPORATION, 36-3892082 (Delaware)


              TSX Corporation, 74-2678034 (Nevada)
                        Texscan Corporation, 35-1109686 (Delaware)
                        Texscan MSI Corporation, 87-0363200
                        Texscan Trading Company, 74-2675440
                        ANTEC International Corp. (Barbados)
                        Texscan Limited (United Kingdom)
                        Texscan de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)


              Scientific-Atlanta LA Venture, Inc., 58-2084469 (Florida)


              ANTEC Pacific, Inc., 36-4011273 (Illinois)
                        Australia Branch


              ANTEC Spain, Inc., 36-4011277 (Illinois)
                        Spain Branch

 
              ANTEC Digital Video Inc., 58-2163150 (shell company) (Illinois)


              Itel Holdings, Inc., 36-3661133 (Illinois)
                        Electronic Connector Corp. of Illinois, 36-3542005
                        (Illinois)
                        Regal Technologies, Ltd., 36-3661130 (Illinois)
                        ANTEC Latin America, Inc., 36-3684616 (Illinois)
                                  Communicaciones Broadband S.A. de C.V.
                                  Communicaciones Broadband Argentina,
                                  Communicaciones Broadband do Brasil, Ltd


              Power Guard, Inc., 63-1139816 (Illinois)
              Engineering Technologies Group, Inc., 36-4019840 (Colorado)
              Electronic System Product, Inc., 36-4011341 (Illinois)


              Keptel, Inc., 36-3977107 (Delaware)
                            Comfab Technologies, Inc., 36-2820491 (Delaware)
                            Benefits Connection, Inc., 22-3333376 (New Jersey)
                            Keptel de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)


              Anixter CATV Industries, 95-3582672 (California)
                            Home Satellite System, 95-3954194 (California)
                            MSO Supply Company, 95-3795688 (California)


              ANTEC International Holdings, Inc., 36-3943825 (Illinois)
                            ANTEC Hong Kong
                            ANTEC China
                            ANTEC Singapore


              Antec Foreign Sales Corporation (Barbados)
[751 NYS2d 669]

#### Fanny Grunberg & Associates, LLC, Appellant, v Thomas Hyatt, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 5, 2002

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Schwartz & Nahins, P.C.,*New York City *(Paul N. Gruber*of counsel), for appellant. *Scott &*
      *798
      *Liburd,*New York City *(Marjorie A. Liburd*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered February 26, 2002 modified to deny tenant’s cross motion and to reinstate the petition; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs to petitioner-appellant.

The June 15, 2001 notice of termination underlying this nuisance holdover proceeding alleged that tenant caused “extensive water damage” to his own apartment on at least two specified occasions, viz., April 26, 2000 and “most recently” March 29, 2001; that tenant additionally caused “serious damage to the apartment below”; that tenant failed to provide access to the landlord to enable it “to rectify and inspect conditions” in the subject apartment; and that tenant’s course of conduct was in violation of Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2524.3 (b) and enumerated provisions of tenant’s lease and lease rider. In such form, the termination notice was sufficiently particularized to withstand the tenant’s “due process” challenge, and was “reasonable * * * in view of [the] attendant circumstances” *(Hughes v Lenox Hill Hosp.,*226 AD2d 4, 17, *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*90 NY2d 829). That the notice meaningfully apprised tenant of the factual underpinnings of the landlord’s nuisance claim was confirmed by tenant’s own moving papers, which include a detailed, four-page affidavit addressing the merits of the litigation and essaying to chronicle the history of “systemic” water leaks and “plumbing problems” in the building premises. Nor was the termination notice rendered jurisdictionally defective by the misstatement that it was served pursuant to Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2524.3 (d) (which authorizes eviction proceedings based on “immoral or illegal” use), particularly since the notice correctly and conspicuously referenced Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2524.3 (b) as the proper statutory predicate for the landlord’s stated nuisance claim.

Suarez, P.J., McCooe and Gangel-Jacob, JJ., concur.
SERVED : JUN E10 , 201 1 • -•'•'.RTMEhlTOI U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N^F\.)R17\TiO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C (OPERATIO N

j i . ! 3 A il : U b I NTH EMATTE RO F M & RHELICOPTERS , LL C FA A DOCKE T NO . CPlOSOOO l 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-121 1 OIIDE RREASSIGNIN GPROCEEDIN G Inth e interes t

o f judicia l efficiency , th e above-captione dproceedin g i s reassigne dfi^om Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e Ronni e A . Yode r t o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l fijture pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o nth e attache dServic e List . S O ORDERED .

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t Ronni e A

Chie f Administrativ eREVISE D ' ORIGINiM^ ^ Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC * -rjsHi..^ i ^ Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suite'wlr^ * FA A Docke t No . CPlOSOOO l 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action )

Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC , Respondent' s Representativ e 281 6 Orefiel dRoa d Allentown , P A 1810 4 TEL : 610-360-395 3 FAX : Charles Raley , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l . • Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-335 7 FAX : 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6 ir;«l^:|»: ' ':!K"^ m

i:3f : *:tQr , 0/ i

^>% -

' Service was b y U.S . Mail . For servic e inpers ^ (^jl>

y AviationAdministration , 60 0 Independenc e Avent>c,^S.^ ; D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430/ Hp i courier , us e the followin

g actress : Federa

l "V^Hgh t Building—Suit

e 2WlbO0 , Washington ,

^ ^
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Treasure Mountain Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10- QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Lane Clissold, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   Lane Clissold
------------------------------
Lane Clissold
Principal Accounting Officer
May 14, 2004

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. MARKEY:
       H.R. 6272.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8
```
# C_2010063EN.01004304.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/43

---

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 12 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Hungary

(Case C-530/08) (1)

1

2010/C 63/70

Language of the case: Hungarian

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                David Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| David                Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| Chief                Executive Officer of RichmanHousing                Credits Inc., general partnerof                Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P.,General                Partner of the RegistrantJuly                10, 2008 |

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5619]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM REAUTHORIZATION 
                              ACT OF 2012

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The unfinished business is the question on 
suspending the rules and passing the bill (H.R. 6062) to reauthorize 
the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program through 
fiscal year 2017.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the rules and 
pass the bill.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________
```