alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

l1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139174 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139174 

 COA: 283952 

Monroe CC: 07-036095-FH 

CHARLES DION-EDWARDS JOHNICAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2009141EN.01003602.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Liège (Belgium)) — Real Madrid Football Club, Zinedine Zidane, David Beckham, Raul Gonzalez Blanco, Ronaldo Luiz Nazario de Lima, Luis Filipe Madeira Caeiro, Futebol Club Do Porto S.A.D., Victor Baia, Ricardo Costa, Diego Ribas da Cunha, P.S.V. N.V., Imari BV, Juventus Football Club SPA v Sporting Exchange Ltd, William Hill Credit Limited, Victor Chandler (International) Ltd, BWIN International Ltd (Betandwin), Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Ltd, Ladbroke Belgium S.A., Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd, Global Entertainment Ltd

(Case C-584/08) (1)

1

2009/C 141/73

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00515-CV

IN RE Leopoldo LEAL

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 17, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 20, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 One of the proceedings relator complains of is Cause No. 328050, styled State of Texas v. Leopoldo Leal, in the 

Municipal Court City of Alice, Jim Wells County, the Honorable Edie Gonzales-Lemon presiding. The other 

complaint relator makes relates to a proceeding he contends he filed in County Court at Law, Jim Wells County, 

Texas; however, no cause number in that proceeding, if any exists, has been provided.
Renewal of Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement




 EXHIBIT 10.24 
  
 Sam Caster 
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
 Direct Dial: 972.471.725D 
 Email: scaster@mannatech.corn 
  
 March 7, 2005 
  
  
  
 Dr. H. Reg McDaniel 
  

	RE:	Renewal of the Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement dated February 1, 2004 (“Confidentiality Agreement”) and the First Amendment to the Agreement dated March 3, 2004
(“2004 Amendment”), collectively, the “2004 Agreement”. 

  
 Dear Dr. Reg, 
  
 Under the terms and conditions of this Letter Agreement, the Company has determined that it is in its best interests to renew the 2004 Agreement for an additional one (1)
year period. All other terms of the 2004 Agreement shall remain in full force and effect with the following amendment at paragraph 13: 
  
 13. Term. 
  
 This Agreement commences on February 1, 2005, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and continues in full force and effect for one (1) year and will
expire on January 31, 2006 (“Initial Term”). Mannatech has the option to renew this Agreement for a further one (1) year term on the same terms and conditions, such option to be exercisable by notice in writing by Mannatech given not less
than one (1) month prior to the expiration of the Initial Term 
  
 Please execute
and return an original of this letter promptly and add your copy to your records. 
  
 Very truly yours, 
  
 /s/ Sam Caster 
 Sam Caster 
 Chairman & Chief 
 Executive Officer of 
 Mannatech, Inc. 
  
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: 
 /s/ H. Regninald McDaniel         

 H. Reginald McDaniel 
  

	Cc:	Stephen Fenstermacher 

 Cindy Marr
# C_2008285EN.01003001.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/30

---

Action brought on 18 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-402/08)

(2008/C 285/49)

Language of the case: Slovene

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by U. Wölker and V. Kovačič, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | A declaration that the Republic of Slovenia, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

A declaration that the Republic of Slovenia, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | an order that the Republic of Slovenia should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Republic of Slovenia should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of Directive 2004/35/CE expired on 30 April 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 143, p. 56.

1

---
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 437 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify 

authority under existing grant guidance authorizing use 

of Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland 

Security Grant Program funding for enhancing medical 

preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 437 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Preparedness 

3 Allowable Use Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 

5 FUNDS FOR ENHANCING MEDICAL PRE6 PAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, 

7 AND MASS PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES. 

8 Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

9 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 

11 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (10) 

12 through (14) as paragraphs (11) through (15), 

13 respectively; and 

14 (B) by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

15 following new paragraph (10): 

16 ‘‘(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical 

17 surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, in18 cluding the development and maintenance of an ini19 tial pharmaceutical stockpile, including medical kits, 

20 and diagnostics sufficient to protect first responders, 

21 their families, immediate victims, and vulnerable 

22 populations from a chemical or biological event;’’; 

23 and 
3 

•HR 437 EH

1 (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ‘‘sub2 section (a)(10)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(11)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 437 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

pabilities. medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis cafunding for enhancing medical preparedness, and State Homeland Security Grant Program authorizing use of Urban Area Security Initiative codify authority under existing grant guidance
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer I, A. Lee Miller, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB
Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): 19.




---



##### 



a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ A. Lee Miller
A. Lee Miller
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
 20.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 12

- 00865

- CR Timothy A. WALKER , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 12

- 0765

- CR Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 6, 2013
DISMISSED Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Timothy A. Walker pled guilty to evading arrest with a vehicle, enhanced. The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargai n agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).04

- 12

- 00865

- CR

- 2

- The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to b y the defendant and that the trial court denied permission to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). After reviewing the clerk’s record, the trial court’s certification therefore appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea bargain case and appella nt does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). On January 25, 2013, we gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record by February 25, 2013. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508 347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref ’ d) (not designated for publication). An amended certification showing appellant has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6065]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           TEXT OF AMENDMENTS

  SA 2780. Mr. CASEY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
him to the bill S. 3457, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
to establish a veterans jobs corps, and for other purposes; which was 
ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the end, add the following:

     SEC. __. CREDIT FOR STATE LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION COSTS 
                   OF MILITARY SPOUSES ARISING BY REASON OF A 
                   PERMANENT CHANGE IN THE DUTY STATION OF THE 
                   MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES TO ANOTHER STATE.

       (a) In General.--Subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of 
     chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
     inserting after section 30D the following new section:

     ``SEC. 30E. STATE LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION COSTS OF 
                   MILITARY SPOUSE ARISING FROM TRANSFER OF MEMBER 
                   OF ARMED FORCES TO ANOTHER STATE.

       ``(a) In General.--In the case of an eligible individual, 
     there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by 
     this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to the 
     qualified relicensing costs of such individual which are paid 
     or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year.
       ``(b) Maximum Credit.--The credit allowed by this section 
     with respect to each change of duty station shall not exceed 
     $500.
       ``(c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
       ``(1) Eligible individual.--The term `eligible individual' 
     means any individual--
       ``(A) who is married to a member of the Armed Forces of the 
     United States at the time that the member moves to another 
     State under a permanent change of station order, and
       ``(B) who moves to such other State with such member.
       ``(2) Qualified relicensing costs.--The term `qualified 
     relicensing costs' costs--
       ``(A) which are for a license or certification required by 
     the State referred to in paragraph (1) to engage in the 
     profession that such individual engaged in while within the 
     State from which the individual moved, and
       ``(B) which are paid or incurred during the period 
     beginning on the date that the orders referred to in 
     paragraph (1)(A) are issued and ending on the date which is 1 
     year after the reporting date specified in such orders.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such 
     subpart A is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
     section 30D the following new item:

``Sec. 30E. State licensure and certification costs of military spouse 
              arising from transfer of member of Armed Forces to 
              another State.''.

       (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 
     2011.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5686-H5687]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 TAXMAN GRABS A PIECE OF THE GOLD MEDAL

  (Mr. POE of Texas asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, Team USA's Fierce Five became the

[[Page H5687]]

second American women's gymnastics team ever to win the gold medal. 
These teenagers will also be awarded $25,000 each for being the best in 
the Olympic world--but what they've earned they're not going to be able 
to keep because part of the medal and the prize will be confiscated by 
our government, so sayeth Uncle Sam.
  That's right, Mr. Speaker. Each one of the Fierce Five has to pay a 
medal tax of up to $236. Then they also have to pay a prize tax on 
their cash award that could be up to $8,750. So that brings the total 
up to about $9,000 that they could owe the taxman. Leave it to our 
government to punish Team USA for their success on behalf of all 
Americans.
  Yesterday, Senator Rubio introduced a bill to exempt Olympic 
medalists from paying taxes on their medals and their prizes. I am a 
cosponsor of a similar bill in this House. The long arm of the internal 
taxman reaches far across the seas to grab a piece of the gold from 
kids that it neither earned nor deserves.
  And that's just the way it is.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of Unify Corporation (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: September 13, 2002 |  | /s/TODD E. WILLETodd E. Wille Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07168

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07168\07168_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07168\07168_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07168\07168_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07168\07168_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07168\07168_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07168\07168_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07168\Certification Statement Plant ID 07168.pdf Plant certification statement

07168\Supplemental Documents\07168_Map-1 Rupert.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07168\Supplemental Documents\07168_WB-1 Rupert.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88932-88933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Advisory Council, January 
10, 2024, 08:30 a.m. to January 11, 2024, 04:30 p.m., National 
Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, C Wing 6th Floor 
Conf. Room F&G, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on September 19, 2023, 88 FR 64448.
    This meeting is being amended to reflect the change in time on the 
second day of the meeting, January 11, 2024 from 04:30 p.m. to 12:00 
p.m., and to add the conference room to the meeting location Building 
31, 6th Floor Conference Room F&G. The meeting is partially closed to 
the public.


[[Page 88933]]


    Dated: December 20, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28389 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street

## ~

# rQ'\ {0)

# \W Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

## ~**~**

# tF U

The Honorable Robert M. Summers, Secretary Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230
Dear Secretary Summers: On January 8, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department ofthe Environment (MDE). The SIP revision addresses the infrastructure elements specified in section 11 0(a)(2)(A) through (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 lead national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the State ofMaryland. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).
Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Emlyn Velez-Rosa, Office ofAir Pr9gram Planning, at (215) 814-2038, or velez-rosa.emlyn@epa.gov. Sincerely,

# ~(A_\./~C~ 

# @._ +
Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

cc: George (Tad) Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning



# .,. tJ Printed on I00% recycled/recyclablepaper with I00%post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
#### Kenneth L. Deubell, as Administrator of the Estate of Jacqueline A. Deubell, Deceased, Respondent, v Forks Fire District Number Three et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this Dram Shop case, the moving defendants failed to establish a prima facie defense sufficient to warrant judgment as a matter of law, and the burden never shifted to plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center,*64 NY2d 851). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.