alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009205EN.01001002.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 July 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — EGN BV — Filiale Italiana v Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Roma 2

(Case C-377/08) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 17(3)(a) - Deductibility and refunding of input VAT - Provision of telecommunications services - Supply of services for a customer established in another Member State - Article 9(2)(e) - Determination of the place where the service is provided)

2009/C 205/17

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EGN BV — Filiale Italiana

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Roma 2

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corte suprema di cassazione — Interpretation of Article 9(2)(e) and Article 17(3)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Supply of cross-border telecommunications services — Right of the supplier of such services to deduct input tax, as permitted under the domestic regime

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17(3)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as meaning that a supplier of telecommunications services such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, which is established in the territory of a Member State, is entitled under that provision to deduct or obtain a refund in that Member State of input value added tax on telecommunications services that have been supplied to an undertaking having its principal place of business in another Member State, since such a supplier would have had that right if the services at issue had been supplied in the territory of the former Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Treasure Mountain  Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), Lane Clissold, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   Lane Clissold
----------------------------------
      Lane Clissold
      Principal Accounting Officer

August 14, 2002
Order entered August 7, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01486-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V. AND S.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968-V

ORDER

We REINSTATE the appeal.

We abated this appeal on August 2, 2018 to allow the trial court an opportunity to 

conduct a hearing to determine whether a record was made of a December 15, 2017 hearing held 

in this matter. By letter filed August 6, 2018, Joie Rivera, Official Court Reporter of the 255th 

Judicial District Court, notified the Court that she was informed by appellee’s counsel that “no 

court reporter [was] present” for the hearing. 

Accordingly, as the issue to be determined by the trial court has been settled, we 

VACATE our August 2, 2018 order. 

 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDATORY AGREEMENT 
 TO
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDATORY AGREEMENT (the “Amendatory Agreement”) is made and entered into as of
the 1st day of January, 2017 by and among Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”), Lakeland Bank (the “Bank” and, collectively with Bancorp, the “Company”) and Robert A. Vandenbergh (the “Executive”). 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a certain Change in Control Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2001, which
Agreement has been amended from time to time thereafter (as amended, the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Agreement
provides for certain terms and conditions of the Executive’s employment in the event of a “Change in Control” (as defined therein); and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to clarify certain terms of the severance to be paid thereunder;
and 
 WHEREAS, Section 16 of the Agreement permits the Agreement to be amended by a writing executed by the parties thereto;

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that, effective as of the date first above written, the following
sections are hereby amended: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1(c) of the Agreement (definition of the “Contract Period”) is hereby amended by deleting the noted subsection in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 


Contract Period. “Contract Period” shall mean the period commencing the day immediately preceding a Change in Control and
ending of the earlier of (i) the second anniversary of the Change in Control, (ii) December 31, 2017, or (iii) the death of the Executive.” 

Except as specifically provided herein to the contrary, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 

[Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendatory Agreement to be executed and
the Executive has hereunto set his hand, all as of the date first above written. 
  

	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	/s/ Robert A. Vandenbergh
	Robert A. Vandenbergh


  

	
	WITNESS:
	
	/s/ Timothy J. Matteson
	EVP, General Counsel and
	Corporate Secretary

  

			
	LAKELAND BANCORP, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Thomas J. Shara
		 	Thomas J. Shara, President and CEO


  

	
	WITNESS:
	
	/s/ Timothy J. Matteson
	EVP, General Counsel and
	Corporate Secretary

  

			
	LAKELAND BANK
		
	By:	 	/s/ Thomas J. Shara
		 	Thomas J. Shara, President and CEO


  

	
	WITNESS:
	
	/s/ Timothy J. Matteson
	EVP, General Counsel and
	Corporate Secretary
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18243-18244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, April 11, 2012, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Department of Energy Information Center, 1 Science.gov Way, 
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melyssa P. Noe, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 241-3315; Fax (865) 576-0956 or email: 
noemp@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the

[[Page 18244]]

areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The scheduled topic is an update on the status of 
the Uranium-233 Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Melyssa P. Noe at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Melyssa P. Noe at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Melyssa P. 
Noe at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site:  http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on March 20, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-7308 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Albert N. Moussab, Chief Financial Officer of Lucille Farms, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.       the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 31, 2003


                                    By: /s/ Albert N. Moussab
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Albert N. Moussab, Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lucille Farms, Inc. and will be retained by Lucille Farms, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2013313EN.01001503.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2013 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-164/08) (1)

1

(Languages - Notices of open competition for the recruitment of doctors - Full publication in three official languages - Information concerning the notices of open competitions - Publication in all official languages - Language of the tests - Choice of second language from three official languages)

2013/C 313/27

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by F. Díez Moreno, and subsequently by N. Díaz Abad and J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, abogados del Estado)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/125/08 (AD 7 and AD 9) to constitute a reserve list of doctors, published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union of 21 February 2008 (OJ 2008 C 48 A, p. 1).

Official Journal of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the notices of open competition EPSO/AD/125/08 (AD 7 and AD 9) to constitute a reserve list of doctors, published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union of 21 February 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the notices of open competition EPSO/AD/125/08 (AD 7 and AD 9) to constitute a reserve list of doctors, published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union of 21 February 2008;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 21.6.2008.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 35 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-113, CP2024-118.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28050 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 440 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit sentencing judges in 

child sex trafficking cases to order the Attorney General to publicize 

the name and photograph of the convicted defendants, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2017 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself and Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit sentencing 

judges in child sex trafficking cases to order the Attorney 

General to publicize the name and photograph of the 

convicted defendants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shame Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 440 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION PERTAINING TO 

2 PERSONS CONVICTED IN CONNECTION WITH 

3 CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING. 

4 Section 1591 of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(f) The court may order the Attorney General to 

7 publish publicly the name and photograph of any person 

8 convicted under this section.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas M. Crowder, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransCommunity Financial Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2006;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

February 26, 2007

|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Thomas M. Crowder   
|Thomas M. Crowder       
|Chief Accounting Officer
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SIN Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steve S. SinhuiSteve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer 
and Chief Financial Officer





August 5, 2008



























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Gary A. Bernardo, Respondent, v USAir Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Piedmont Airlines, Inc., Appellant.

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: The court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the default, namely, the loss of the litigation file on the day the summons was received by *643defendant’s in-house legal department *(cf., Tiger v Town of Bolton,*150 AD2d 889 [holding that defendant’s loss of summons in mailing it to insurer constitutes reasonable excuse]). There is no indication that defendant intended to abandon the action, the period of delay was relatively short, defendant promptly moved to vacate the default judgment, and plaintiff will not be prejudiced by vacating the default *(Mulder v Rockland Armor & Metal Corp.,*140 AD2d 315, 316; *Balint v Marine Midland Bank,*112 AD2d 1023; *Klenk v Kent,*103 AD2d 1002, *appeal dismissed*63 NY2d 953). Defendant also established a meritorious defense, viz., that plaintiff’s dismissals were for good cause. We note, in any event, that New York generally does not recognize a cause of action for wrongful termination of employment *(see generally, Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293). In these circumstances, the dispute should be resolved on the merits. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — Vacate Default Judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32**








**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher J. Reed,
      Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Christopher J. Reed





Christopher
      J. Reed,


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


and
      Chief
      Financial Officer




June 15, 2006