alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2020

No. 04-19-00860-CV

IN RE VILORE FOODS COMPANY, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The Respondent’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Relator’s Petition for 

Writ of Mandamus is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to February 14, 2020.

It is so ORDERED on January 17, 2020.

 

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

 Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CVF00316 D1, styled Catalina Castillo v. Vilore Foods 

Company, Inc. and Raymundo Bretano, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the 

Honorable Joe Lopez presiding.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit No. 23
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (the Company) on Forms S-8 [Registration Nos.
33-42677 (Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan), 33-42678 (Stock Incentive
Plan), 33-51460 (Section 401(k) Plan), 33-60663 (Retirement Plan), 33-60661
and 33-65351 (Employee Stock Ownership Plan), 33-60665 (Consultants, Agents
and Part-Time Employees Stock Plan) and 33-51812 (Employee Stock Purchase
Plan)] and on Form S-3 [Registration No. 33-51677 (600,000 Warrants)], and
[Registration No. 333-16937 (1,135,795 shares)] of our report dated April 15,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of ICF Kaiser International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in the Company's Report on
Form 10-K.
 
                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
McLean, Virginia
April 15, 1999
#### Joyce Waldron, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered September 7, 1989, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $37,500.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the defendant City of New York.

*124We agree with the defendant City of New York that the demarcation "CONS” on a map filed with it, did not provide it with notice of a defective sidewalk condition where the plaintiff fell. Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to establish compliance with the "Pothole Law” (Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 [c] [2]). Although a director of the Big Apple Pothole Corporation, who timely filed the map, testified that the "CONS” symbol meant that there were too many defective conditions as a result of construction to separately mark them with X’s in accordance with the legend appended to the filed map, there was no showing that the City knew or should have known what the term "CONS”, which was not included on the legend, meant.

Further, although prior written notice of a defective condition is not required where the City has created the unsafe condition *(see, Kiernan v Thompson,*73 NY2d 840, 841-842; *Parks v Hutchins,*162 AD2d 666, 668-669), the plaintiff is not entitled to a new trial on that issue because there was no evidence adduced to demonstrate that the City caused or created the condition in the first instance. Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### State v. Perez

20880

11/20/98

Granted

90 Hawai'i 113, 976 P.2d 427
Exhibit 3.2

ENCORIUM GROUP, INC

STATE OF DELAWARE

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF COVALENT GROUP,
INC.

Covalent Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware does hereby certify:

FIRST: That the Board of Directors of COVALENT GROUP, INC. by unanimous consent in writing without
the formality of convening a meeting, duly adopted resolutions setting forth proposed amendments of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendments to be advisable and proposing that said amendments be considered by
the stockholders of said corporation. The resolutions setting forth the proposed amendments are as follows:

RESOLVED, that, subject
to the approval of the Companys stockholders at the Companys 2006 annual meeting of stockholders (the Meeting), the First Article of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company be amended and restated to read as follows:

Article I: The name of the corporation is Encorium Group, Inc.;

RESOLVED, that, subject to the approval of the Companys stockholders at the Meeting, the Fourth Article of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company be amended and restated to read as follows:

Article IV: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue is 35,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, $.001 par value per share (the Common Stock);

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board
of Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares
as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendments.

THIRD: That said amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has
caused this certificate to be signed this 25th day of October, 2006.



|       |  |                                                     
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Lawrence R. Hoffman                             
|       |  | Authorized Officer                                  
|Name:  |  | Lawrence R. Hoffman                                 
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1359]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RETIREMENT OF MAJOR GENERAL GINA FARRISEE

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. BRETT GUTHRIE

                              of kentucky

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Mr. GUTHRIE. Mr. Speaker, today I wish to recognize the dedication 
and selfless service of Major General Gina Farrisee, who will culminate 
her 34-year Army career as the Commanding General of Human Resources 
Command in Ft. Knox, Kentucky.
  As a Member of Congress, a Kentuckian, and a former Army Officer, it 
is an honor to recognize Major General Farrisee today before the United 
States House of Representatives. She is a native of Virginia, a 1978 
graduate of the University of Richmond and the National Defense 
University in 1998. She was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in the 
U.S. Army, serving her career as an Adjutant General Officer.
  Major General Farrisee's career highlights include a variety of 
command and staff positions at Army installations around the world to 
include Germany, Ft. Bliss, TX; Ft. Lewis, WA; Ft. Benjamin Harrison, 
IN; and Ft. Jackson, SC. During several key assignments in the Pentagon 
she worked for the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Assistant Secretary 
of Defense for Force Management Policy and four years as the Army's 
Director of Military Personnel Management. Her highly successful 
command assignments included battalion command at Ft. Lewis, brigade 
command at Ft. Benjamin Harrison and the Army's Soldier Support 
Institute at Ft. Jackson. Most recently, Major General Farrisee headed 
Army Human Resources Command, at Ft. Knox in my district. Her selfless 
service, professionalism and expertise were highlighted while assigned 
as the 61st Adjutant General of the Army.
  Throughout her service, Major General Farrisee has been a shining 
example for our Nation. It has been my pleasure to highlight Major 
General Farrisee's long and decorated career today. On behalf of a 
grateful Nation, I join my colleagues today in commending and thanking 
Major General Farrisee for a lifetime of service during peace and 
wartime to her country. Her sacrifices and contributions will be 
forever remembered in the Soldiers and families she mentored and 
inspired. Those same Soldiers will miss her leadership, technical 
competence, mentorship and enthusiasm, as well as her daily 
inspiration--``It's a Great Day to be a soldier. . . . Hooah!''
  For all she and her family have given to our country, we are in debt. 
We wish her and her husband David, all the best as they continue their 
journey.

                          ____________________
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 27, 2010

s0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

140144

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140144 COA: 281207 St. Clair CC: 06-003248-FC WILLIAM ROGER DEKEYZER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 13, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Library of Congress

###### Copyright Royalty Board

          - 37 CFR Part 380
          - [Docket No. 19-CRB-0005-WR (2021-2025) COLA (2024)

# AGENCY:

Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), Library of Congress.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On November 30, 2023, the Copyright Royalty Judges amended regulations governing royalty rates that commercial and noncommercial noninteractive webcasters pay for eligible transmissions pursuant to the statutory licenses for the public performance of and for the making of ephemeral reproductions of sound recordings. That document contained an incorrect reference to a rate. This document corrects that reference.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         This correction is effective December 20, 2023.                    

*Applicability dates:*                         The adjusted rates as published on November 30, 2023, are applicable to the period January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anita Brown, (202) 707-7658,                         *crb@loc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On November 30, 2023, at 88 FR 83508, the Copyright Royalty Judges published a rule that contained an incorrect reference to a rate in the                     **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                     section. This document corrects that reference.                

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of Thursday, November 30, 2023, in FR Rule Doc. 2023-26221, appearing on page 83508, make the following correction:                

1. On page 85309, in the first column, in the fourth paragraph, correct “$0.20025” to read “$0.0025”.

Dated: December 15, 2023.

David P. Shaw,

Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.

[FR Doc. 2023-28098 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1410-72-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5368]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS

                                 ______
                                 

                    TRIBUTE TO DR. NEOSHA A. MacKEY

 Mr. BLUNT. Mr. President, today I wish to honor Neosha A. 
Mackey, who retired earlier this summer as dean of university libraries 
at Missouri State University after 27 years of service. During her 
years of dedicated service, Mackey oversaw the expansion of the Meyer 
Library to meet the needs of the academic community with improved 
access to local archives, manuscripts and photographs. The MSU library 
system also improved its access to other research materials with a 
Special Collections and Archives section available to internet users 
that was previously only accessible to view at the MSU Library.
  Mackey started at Missouri State as the head of reference in 1985. 
Later she served as associate dean of library services, 1987-2009; 
acting dean, 1993-1995, and was appointed dean of library services in 
2009.
  During her tenure, the library enhanced services with a $28 million 
addition and renovation project. Mackey has also been a presence in the 
classroom teaching both undergraduate and graduate level courses while 
monitoring budgets and coordinating personnel matters. As Missouri 
State reached out to establish programs and classes for students in 
China, Mackey and her husband John took a leadership role in the 
development of those programs.
  Mackey also directed an expansion of the Meyer Library's local 
archives and collections with a loan agreement to house, preserve, and 
provide access to manuscripts and photographs owned by The History 
Museum for Springfield-Greene County. The History Museum holds a 
comprehensive collection of photographs and personal documents 
capturing decades of history and changing cultures in Springfield and 
Greene Counties. The new campus location promises improved access for 
researchers and the general public as well as a safer climate- and 
temperature-controlled location for these priceless archives.
  Before arriving at Missouri State, Mackey was at the Ohio State 
University from 1978-1985 as personnel librarian and head of the home 
economics library. She served as assistant to the dean, 1975-1977, and 
as head of the Parish Business Library, 1970-1975, at the University of 
New Mexico. Mackey has a bachelor of arts in economics and a master's 
in library science from the University of Oklahoma and an MBA from the 
University of New Mexico.
  Mackey's achievements and her personal commitment to excellence have 
guided the Missouri State Library program to a place of national 
prominence. I thank her for her efforts and wish her well in her well-
deserved retirement.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4415 

To establish the policy of the United States regarding the no-first-use of 

nuclear weapons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Mr. SMITH of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To establish the policy of the United States regarding the 

no-first-use of nuclear weapons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLICY ON NO-FIRST-USE OF NUCLEAR WEAP4 ONS. 

5 It is the policy of the United States to not use nuclear 

6 weapons first. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8193

DWAYNE L. JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:07-cv-358)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Dwayne L. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El

v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.

Johnson also attached to his informal brief a 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2006) motion to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. To the extent Johnson was attempting to file a § 2244 application, it is premature as to the claims that are the subject of his first § 2254 petition and are pending on

23 appeal. To the extent he is attempting to seek permission to file new claims in a second § 2254 petition, his claims do not satisfy the criteria to grant a § 2244 motion. In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). Johnson’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2010234EN.01003001.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/30

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 February 2010 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

(Case C-566/08) (1)

1

()

2010/C 234/49

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF HEALTHSOURCE, INC.

Name/Doing Business As                                   State of
(if applicable)                                        Incorporation   Ownership
---------------                                        -------------   ---------

Healthsource New Hampshire, Inc.                           NH           100%
Healthsource Indiana Insurance Company                     IN           100%
Healthsource Indiana Managed Care Plan, Inc.               IN           100%
Healthsource Insurance Group, Inc.                         NH           100%
Healthsource South Carolina, Inc.                          SC           100%
Healthsource Insurance Services, Inc.                      SC           100%
Healthsource Tennessee Preferred, Inc.                     TN           100%
Healthsource Tennessee, Inc.                               TN           100%
Healthsource North Carolina Administrators, Inc.           NC           100%
Healthsource North Carolina, Inc.                          NC           100%
Healthsource HMO of New York, Inc.                         NY           100%
Healthsource Preferred, Inc.                               NH           100%
Healthsource Maine, Inc.                                   ME           100%
Healthsource Maine Preferred, Inc.                         ME           100%
Employee Benefit Plan Administration, Inc.                 NH           100%
Healthsource Massachusetts, Inc./Healthsource CMHC         MA           100%
Healthsource Preferred of NY, Inc.                         NY           100%
Healthsource Health Plans, Inc.                            NC           100%
Healthsource South, Inc.                                   NH           100%
Healthsource Management, Inc.                              NH           100%
Healthsource Indiana, Inc.                                 NH           100%
Physicians Health Systems, Inc.                            SC           100%
Healthsource Syracuse, Inc.                                NH           100%
Healthsource Metropolitan New York Holding                 NH           100%
Company, Inc.
<PAGE>   2

Healthsource New York/New Jersey, Inc.                     NY           100%
Healthsource Arkansas, Inc.                                AR            70%
Healthsource Arkansas Preferred, Inc.                      AR            70%
Spradley & Coker, Inc.                                     AR            70%
Healthsource Provident Administrators, Inc.                TN           100%
Healthsource Insurance Company                             TN           100%
Healthsource North Texas, Inc.                             TX            70%
Provident Health Care Plan, Inc. of Tennessee              TN           100%
Healthsource Ohio, Inc.                                    OH           100%
Healthsource Kentucky, Inc.                                KY           100%
Healthsource Georgia, Inc.                                 GA           100%
Healthsource Connecticut, Inc.                             CT           100%