alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                       2,766,552
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  821,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              29,791,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                0
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  23,081,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                29,791,041
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            11,709,770
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             8,207,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               118,023
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             630,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              2,753,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          2,753,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 97,608
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 2,851,478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

3:12 p.m. on Wednesday, December 20, 2023.

# PLACE:

The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities. In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), seconded by Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and concurred in by Vice Chairman Travis J. Hill, Director Jonathan P. McKernan, and Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)10 of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B) and (c)(10)).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

Dated this the 20th day of December, 2023.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-28472 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
mEEQ

SOURCE EMISSIONS

SURVEY BORAL BRICKS,

INC. KILN SCRUBBER

INLET DUCT AND OUTLET

STACK

(EPN K)HENDERSON, TEXAS TNRCC PERMIT

21012 FILE NUMBER

01-245INTRODUCTION METCO Environmental,

P.O. Box 598, Addison,

Texas, conducted

a source emissions survey of Boral Bricks, Inc., located

at 1309 Kilgore Drive, Henderson,

Texas, on August 6, 7, and 8, 2001. The purpose

of these tests was to determine

the concentrations of particulate

matter,

hydrogen

fluoride,

hydrogen

chloride,

chlorine and sulfur dioxide

being emitted

to the atmosphere

via the Kiln Scrubber

Outlet Stack (EPN K). The concentrations

of particulate

matter,

hydrogen

fluoride, hydrogen chloride,

chlorine

and sulfur dioxide

were also determined

at the Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct. Testing

was performed

while the plant was operating

at a production rate of•l• The sampling

was performed

by the following

METCO

personnel:

Jason Conway Project Supervisor,

John Allen, Jeremiah

Johnson,

and Mike Hoskovac. The sampling

followed

the procedures

set forth in the Code of Federal

Regulations, Title 40, Chapter

1, Part 60, Appendix

A, Methods•llllllll/lilll•i•; and in the "Sampling Procedures

Manual,

Texas Air Control

Board, Revised

July t985."

01-245 -1-Z Z Z c5 c5

Z Z 01-245 -2-
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.23 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

The Board of Directors of ShopKo Stores, Inc. (the "Company"), upon the
recommendation of the Board's Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, has set
the following compensation arrangements for non-management directors:

      - Annual cash retainer for Board service: $30,000

      - Board/Committee meeting fees (in-person): $1,500 per meeting

      - Board/Committee meeting fees (teleconference): $750 per meeting

      - Annual grant of Deferred Stock Units (to be granted following the
        Annual Meeting): $5,000

      - Annual option grant to purchase shares of common stock (to be
        granted following the Annual Meeting): 4,000 options

      - Annual equity grant of Restricted Stock: 1,000 shares

      - Annual retainer for Audit Committee chairman: $7,500

      - Annual retainer for other Committee chairmen: $5,000.

The Board of Directors also approved the following compensation for the
Company's non-executive Chairman of the Board (in addition to the above):

      - Annual cash retainer: $75,000

      - Annual option grant to purchase shares of common stock: 7,000
        options

      - Monthly office expense: $1,500.

                                                                              73
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4246 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4246

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to create a buffer in between oil and 
   gas drilling operations and homes, businesses, schools, and other 
   buildings that require special protection, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2017

Ms. Barragan (for herself, Ms. Lee, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. 
 Gomez, Mr. Soto, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Evans, and Mr. Ellison) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to create a buffer in between oil and 
   gas drilling operations and homes, businesses, schools, and other 
   buildings that require special protection, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Drilling in Our Backyards Act''.

SEC. 2. BUFFER FROM OIL AND GAS DRILLING OPERATIONS.

    The Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) is amended by--
            (1) redesignating section 44 as section 45; and
            (2) inserting after section 44 the following:

``SEC. 45. BUFFER FROM OIL AND GAS DRILLING OPERATIONS.

    ``The Secretary of the Interior may not issue a permit for any oil 
and gas drilling operation that is located within 1,500 feet from a 
home, business, school, or other building that requires special 
protection, as determined by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-8138

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM112AD

SBF28-28-053, R2 --- 6/22/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# C_2012319EN.01000602.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/6

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2012 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-356/08) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Arable crops - Proportionality - Increase in the correction due to recurrence of the infringement)

2012/C 319/08

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias, E. Leftheriotou and V. Karra, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and A. Markoulli, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/582/EC of 8 July 2008 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) (OJ 2008 L 186, p. 39), in so far as it excluded certain expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              S E N A T E

Vol. 158

WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2012

No. 120
```
# C_2010209EN.01005103.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/51

---

Order of the General Court of 1 June 2010 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-65/08) (1)

1

()

2010/C 209/78

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      548
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   859
<PP&E>                                              57
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                         307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       916
<SALES>                                          1,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,357
<CGS>                                              900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (39)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,603
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
#### H. A. ANDERSEN CO., INCORPORATED, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 701, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 9-33 and 9-34.

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals.

July 8, 1976.

Terry DeSylvia, Black, Kendall, Tremaine, Boothe & Higgins, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Michael G. Holmes, Dezendorf, Spears, Lubersky & Campbell, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellant.

ORDER

Before CARTER, CHRISTENSEN and ESTES, Circuit Judges.

This case is controlled by prior decisions of this court, *Reed v. Kroger Co.*(Em.App.1973), 478 F.2d 1268, and *United States*v. *Cooper*(Em.App.1973), 482 F.2d 1393.

The motion of the plaintiffs to vacate the order of May 25,1976, allowing the defendant’s out-of-time filing of a notice of appeal in No. 9-33 is granted.

The motion of the plaintiffs to dismiss the defendant’s appeal in No. 9-33 is granted. Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ cross-appeal in No. 9-34 is also dismissed.
# C_2008223EN.01005901.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/59

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 June 2008 — Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-92/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/108)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
H. R. 4528 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To make technical amendments to certain marine fish conservation statutes, and 

for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BILLFISH CONSERVATION ACT OF 2012. 

Section 4(c)(1) of the Billfish Conservation Act of 2012 (16 

U.S.C. 1827a(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and retained’’ after 

‘‘landed’’. 

SEC. 2. SHARK CONSERVATION ACT OF 2010. 

The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the High Seas Driftnet 

Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks’’, approved January 4, 2011 (Public Law 111–348; 

124 Stat. 3668), is amended— 

(1) by striking section 104 and inserting the following: 

‘‘SEC. 104. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

‘‘Nothing in this title or the amendments made by this title 

shall be construed as affecting, altering, or diminishing in any 

way the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to establish such 

conservation and management measures as the Secretary considers 

necessary and appropriate under sections 302(a)(3) and 304(g) of 

the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

(16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(3), 1854(g)).’’; and 

(2) in section 1, by striking the item relating to section 

104 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 104. Rule of construction.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### HOWELL et al. v. RUSHING.

No. 35397.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 15, 1953.

*218Reuel W. Little, Oklahoma City, Thomas E. Shaw, Madill, Edgar S. Vaught, Jr., Oklahoma City,.for plaintiffs in error.

Welch & Welch, Madill, Pierce, Mock & Duncan, Oklahoma City, James W. Shepherd, Jr., Oklahoma City, of counsel, for defendant in error.

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs, as parents and the sole and only heirs of Howard Gaines flowell, deceased, brought this action for the benefit of the heirs and next of kin of decedent to recover damages allegedly sustained by them as a result of the death of decedent, their unborn child, which they allege was caused by the negligence of defendant. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition on the ground that the petition failed to state a cause of action. Defendant concedes that the petition is good against a demurrer except for the ground that “there is no right of action for wrongful death in one whose decedent is a foetus”, or infant en ventre sa mere.

The subject of wrongful death of a foetus, or infant en ventre sa mere, has not previously been considered by this Court, and our decision in this case will be one of first impression.

Title 12 O.S.1951, § 1053, provides:

> “When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representative of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, * * * if the .former might have maintained an action had he lived, against the latter * * * for an injury for the same act or omission. * * * The damages must inure to the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse and children, if any, or next of kin; to be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased.”

There being no administrator, the action is brought by the next of kin, which is permissible if the action is otherwise maintainable. Mid-Continent Petroleum Co. v. Allen, 110 Okl. 101, 236 P. 426.

The plaintiffs rely upon this statute and the rale announced in Verkennes v. Corniea, 229 Minn. 365, 38 N.W.2d 838, 10 A.L.R.2d 634. The defendant relies on the rule as applied in Drabbels v. Skelly Oil Co., 1951, 155 Neb. 17, 50 N.W.2d 229. These cases sustain their respective contentions. We adhere to the rule applied in the Drabbels case, supra, for the reasons stated in that opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

HALLEY, C. J., and CORN, DAVI-SON, ARNOLD, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS, and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.
# You searched for feed - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Feed and Seed: Nourishing Upstate South Carolina In Greenville, South Carolina, Feed &#38; Seed Co. is on a mission to serve farmers and families through a sustainable local food system. Their multi-purpose facility – located in Greenville County’s most food-insecure zip code – acts as a one-stop shop for both food entrepreneurs and shoppers. Through their market, café, crop boxes, food share, [&#8230;]The post Feed and Seed: Nourishing Upstate South Carolina appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Industry Structure and Company Strategies of Major Domestic and Foreign Wind and Solar Energy Manufacturers: Opportunities for Supply Chain Development in Appalachia This report presents results from a  study of the status of the solar- and wind-energy industries in the Appalachian Region and the challenges firms and state governments face in preparing for and competing in these rapidly emerging industries.The post Industry Structure and Company Strategies of Major Domestic and Foreign Wind and Solar Energy Manufacturers: Opportunities for Supply Chain Development in Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Sprouting Farms: Supporting the Future of Farming  Sprouting Farms grows Southern West Virginia’s local food systems through education, resource sharing, land access, and food production. The post Sprouting Farms: Supporting the Future of Farming  appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Princeton, WV: The Role of Arts in Gateway Communities Tireless dedication and love for community have been the driving forces in the nearly two-decade revitalization happening in downtown Princeton, West Virginia. When Lori McKinney (workshop team lead and member of the Princeton Renaissance Project) arrived, Princeton’s downtown was almost empty, with 80% vacancy. Now, 19 years later, the downtown is practically at capacity, filled [&#8230;]The post Princeton, WV: The Role of Arts in Gateway Communities appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.