alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                Exhibit 10.13

          Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the
         Securities and Exchange commission. Asterisks denote omissions.

February 8, 2005


BY OVERNIGHT COURIER

Viviana Wolinsky, Licensing Manager
Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Road, MS 90R1070
Berkeley, California 94720-8125

Re:  LICENSE AGREEMENT/L-03-1370

Dear Ms. Wolinsky:

Reference is made to the License Agreement for Installing Novel Functional
Groups for Therapeutics between Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Momenta") and
the Regents of the University of California through the Ernest Orlando Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory ("Berkeley Lab") dated November 20, 2002, as
amended by letter agreement dated November 16, 2004 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
given such terms in the Agreement.

Momenta has provided Berkeley Lab with a confidential strategic plan pertaining
to Licensed Products. Berkeley has accepted such strategic plan in substitution
for the milestones listed in Exhibit A to the Agreement with the understanding
that Momenta shall fund, or cause its Affiliates, sublicensees and/or corporate
partners to fund, no less than $[**] toward the research, development or
commercialization of Licensed Products during calendar year 2005.

In accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement, Momenta hereby notifies
Berkeley Lab that it elects to extend its rights to the Broader Field for the
remainder of the term of the Agreement and Berkeley Lab hereby accepts such
extension of its rights to the Broader Field.

If Momenta shall fail to expend the anticipated $[**] during calendar year 2005,
Berkeley Lab and Momenta shall meet to discuss the reasons for such failure.
Thereafter, Berkeley Lab may elect to accept substitute milestones achieved
during calendar year 2005, negotiate additional milestones for calendar year
2006, or terminate Momenta's rights to the Broader Field. In the case of
termination of Momenta's rights to the Broader Field,

<Page>

Viviana Wolinsky, Licensing Manager
February 8, 2005
Page 2

Momenta shall nonetheless retain its exclusive license to the Specific
Applications Field which will then be selected in accordance with Section 3.4 of
the Agreement.

If the foregoing is acceptable to Berkeley Lab, please indicate your consent by
counter signing this letter and returning on fully-executed copy to me. We will
then forward the first payment of $[**] to Berkeley Lab.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Susan K. Whoriskey

Susan K. Whoriskey
Vice President, Licensing & Business Development

Agreed and accepted:

The Regents of the University
Of California, through the
Ernest Orlando Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory

By:  /s/ V. Wolinsky
   ----------------------------------------------
# C_2009006EN.01001602.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/16

---

Action brought on 19 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-500/08)

(2009/C 6/27)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Vesco, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (1), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (1), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2005/94/EC into national law expired on 1 July 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 10, p. 16.

1

---
#### Tinplate Purchasing Corporation, Plaintiff, *v.*Tuteur & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

September 10, 1959.

*535*Yellin & Levy*for plaintiff.

*Seligson, Morris & Neuburger*for defendant.

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Each party wishes to first examine the other before trial.

There is no rule of this court with respect to priority of examinations before trial. Rule XX of the Bronx County Supreme Court and rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court, referred to by the parties, deal with this subject but those rules have no application in this court. The practice in this Department is that the party who first serves a notice of examination must be allowed priority in the examination over his adversary unless special circumstances require that the discretion of the court be exercised to direct a different order of examination. *(Desiderio*v. *Gabrielli,*284 App. Div. 976.) The first notices of examination served in the instant action were those of the plaintiff on July 13, 1959. These notices were not premature since issue had been joined as of July 1, 1959. In this Department a notice of an examination may even be served simultaneously with the answer. *(Desiderio*v. *Gabrielli, supra.)*Accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to examine the defendant before it is examined.

Even if, because of the return of plaintiff’s notices, the defendant’s notice of August 7, 1959 were considered to be the first notice the circumstances here are such that the court is constrained to exercise its discretion in plaintiff’s favor. While the defendant’s notice was served prior to the plaintiff’s second notice of August 12, 1959, the date set for the examination in defendant’s notice was more than a month after it was served while the plaintiff’s notice set the date of the examination 12 days from the date served. If the party serving a notice were always allowed to conduct his examination first, he might be in a position to prevent the other side from examining indefinitely by merely setting distant date for such prior examination.

The defendant’s motion is denied and the cross motion is granted. All the parties covered by the notices of July 13 and August 7 are to appear for examination at Special Term, Part II *536at 10:00 a.m., one week from the date of the entry of an order herein, at which time the defendant is to he examined by the plaintiff followed by an examination of the plaintiff by the defendant.

Settle order on notice.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of Mortgage Professional Lead Source,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Mr. Gregory Willits, President and Mr. Michael J. Christensen,
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Gregory Willits
--------------------
Gregory Willits
President
August 8, 2002


/s/  Michael J. Christensen
---------------------------
Michael J. Christensen
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
August 8, 2002
# C_2020240EN.01001801.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2020 — BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA v European Commission, Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH)

(Case C-148/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Regional aid to the steel industry - Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Advantage - Private operator test - Manifest error - Burden of proof - Limits of judicial review)

(2020/C 240/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: BTB Holding Investments SA, Duferco Participations Holding SA (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff, M. Favert and Q. Declève, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and G. Luengo, acting as Agents), Foreign Strategic Investments Holding (FSIH)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders BTB Holding Investments SA and Duferco Participations Holding SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BTB Holding Investments SA and Duferco Participations Holding SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
**Exhibit
            32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C.
            SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
            OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
            connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
            on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended December 31, 2007 as
            filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
            (the
“Report”), I, Scott W. Scampini, Principal Financial Officer of the
            Company, certify, pursuant to section Section 906 of the
            Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge,
            that:
 
 (1) The
            Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
            signed
            original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
            provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
            Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
            its staff
            upon request.


|                                          |                                                                             |                                     
|----------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                                          |                                                                             |                                     
|                                          |                                                                             | /s/  Scott
              W. Scampini
|                                          | Scott W. Scampini
            *(Principal Executive
              Officer)*
|February
            14,
            2008 |
#### United States of America, Plaintiff, *v.*Michalinos Maritime & Commercial Co., Ltd., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 10, 1958.

*733*Dow <& Stonebridge (William J. Troy*of counsel), for defendant.

*Arthur H. Christy, United States Attorney (Gilbert S. Fleischer*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Saul S. Stbeit, J.

Defendant moves for dismissal of the complaint for insufficiency. Plaintiff alleges that by a written agreement dated February 13, 1947, made on its behalf through the United States Maritime Commission as agent, with the defendant, the latter did purchase from the plaintiff a vessel at a stated price. Delivery of the vessel was made on March 6, 1947 and the stated purchase price was paid. The contract contained a provision as follows: ‘ ‘ The above purchase price of the vessel is computed as of the above date. . It is understood, if it shall be determined by the Commission upon examination of the vessel that the vessel lacks or contains desirable feature? as defined in clauses (2) and (3) of section 3(d) of the Act, that such purchase price shall be decreased, within the limits of the floor price of the vessel, or increased, by such amounts, if any, as may be determined by the Commission pursuant to said clauses, and the Buyer agrees to pay upon demand any increase in the purchase price so determined by the Commission.” It is then alleged that pursuant to the provisions of the contract plaintiff determined that the vessel contained certain equipment described as desirable features in the value of a stated sum. This is an allegation of ultimate fact. It is unnecessary to allege the determination was made by the commission since such determination would be plaintiff’s in any ease. The contention that upon payment and acceptance of the purchase price as stated in the contract any adjustment under the quoted provision is merged therein is without merit at least as a matter of pleading.

The motion is denied.
# i r t ^ c
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C . 4 1 Nort h7 3 West , Inc. , db aAVITA T Westcheste r

an dJe t System s COMPLAINANT/APPELLAN T Th e Count y o f

Westchester , New Yor k RESPONDENT/APPELLE E Docke t No . 16-07-1 3

NOTIC E O FEXTENSIO N O FTIM E C 5 Thi s matte r

i s befor e th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) basedo n th e abpve reference dcomplaint , filedi n accordanc e wit h FA A Rule s o f

Practic e fo r

Federaliy - S Assiste dAirpor t

Enforcemen t

Proceedings , 14CFRPar t 16 . Pursuan t

t o 14CFRPar t

l6f" subpart B , th e dat e b y whic h th e Fina l Agenc y Decisio n wil l b e issue di n thi s matte r i s hereb y extende dt o Jun e 30 , 2009 . A n extensio n o f

tim e i s necessar y an dappropriat e for afair an dcomplet e determinatio n i n thi s case .

^ • ^ Catherin e M . Lan g Actin g Associat e A ' fo r Airport s istrato rCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t o n TDQLM . /J , (SOO f I place din th e Unite d State s mai l (firs t

class , postag e paid ) ^^ii e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

addresse dto : Pete r J . Kirsc h Davi dI . Specto r KAPLA N KIRSC H & ROCKWELL , LL P 167 5 Broadway , Suit e 230 0 Denver , Colorad o 8020 2 Richar dCashman Jame s Wenze l Count y o f

Westcheste r 1 8 Martin e Avenue , Roo m60 0 Whit e Plains , Ne w York , 1060 1 FA A Part 1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t

Almari aGasto n for Airpor t Complianc e an dFiel dOperation s
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5689]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF AMERICAN FOLKLIFE CENTER

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair announces the Speaker's 
reappointment, pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 2103(b), and the order of the 
House of January 5, 2011, of the following individual from private life 
to the Board of Trustees of the American Folklife Center in the Library 
of Congress on the part of the House for a term of 6 years:
  Mr. C. Kurt Dewhurst, Michigan

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 452 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 452

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the 
           ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JEFFREY L. WHITE, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 11, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 452

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the 
           ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.
```
Hi Thomas, This e-mail is sufficient to request an extension. Therefore, a paper copy of your letter requesting an extension it is not required. Thanks!
Sincerely, Jezebele Alicea-Virella

-----"Davis, Thomas L" <Thomas.L.Davis@dynegy.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Davis, Thomas L" <T homas.L.Davis@dynegy.com> Date: 07/14/2010 01:59PM cc: "Diericx, Rick" <Ari c.Diericx@dynegy.com>, "Leskovsek, Andreas H" <Andreas.H.Leskovsek@dynegy.com> Subject: FW: DMG Request for Extension of Time

Ms. Alicea,

The attached letter was returned this morning to me by UPS. They said they could not deliver to the following address:

Jezebele Alicea

Mail Code: 4303T

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460

What address should I use for UPS delivery?

Is a paper copy of our request even necessary , or was our July 7, 2010 e-mail attachment sufficient?

Thanks for your help.

Thomas L. Davis, P.E. 

### Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EA66CD

...Manager; Environmental Projects
Operations Environmental Compliance
Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

604 Pierce Blvd.
O'Fallon, IL 62269

Office No. 618-206-5931
Blackberry No. 618-407-8553

Fax No. 618-206-5891

9/80 Schedule "B"

From: Diericx, Rick Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:51 AM To: alicea.jezebele@epa.gov Cc: Davis, Thomas L; Trammell, Ben; dellin ger.robert@epa.gov; devlin.betsy@epa.gov Subject: DMG Request for Extension of Time

Attached is a copy of Dynegy Midwest Generation’s request for an extension of time to prepare and submit its responses to US EPA’s Steam Electric Power Generating Industry Effluent Limitations Guidelines Information Collection Request.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Rick Diericx
Senior Director – Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

618.206.5912 

### Pa g e 2 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EA66CD

...
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
2006 PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN
 l.00 PURPOSE
 [1] [2] [3]
  2.00       DEFINITIONS
  Act.
 Affiliate.
 Board.
 Code.
 Change in Control.
 [1]
 [2]
 [3]
 [4]
 1




---



##### 



Committee. [1] [a] [b] [2]
 Company.
 Disability or Disabled.
 Employee.
 Incumbent Director. [1] [2]
 Participant.
 Participation Agreement.
 Payment Date.
 Performance Criteria.
 2




---



##### 



Performance Cycle.
 Plan.
 Retirement.
 Stock.
 3.00 PARTICIPATION
 3.01 Designation of Participants. [1] [2] .
 3.02 Retroactive Loss of Eligibility.
 4.00       ADMINISTRATION
 4.0l Performance Criteria.
 [1] [a] [b] [c] [d]
 [2]
 3




---



##### 



[a]
 [b]
 [c]
 [d]
 [e]
 [f]
 [g]
 [h]
 [i]
 [3] [a] , [b] [c]
 [4] [a] [b] [c]
 [5]
 [a]
 [b]
 4.02 Certification.
 4




---



##### 



4.03 Administration. [1] [2] [3]
 4.04 Reduction.
 [1]
 [2]
 5.00 EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT DURING PERFORMANCE CYCLE; CHANGE IN CONTROL
 5.01 Effect of Termination of Employment During Performance Cycle for Reasons Other Than
Retirement, Death or Disability.
 5.02 Effect of Retirement, Death or Disability During Performance Cycle.
 [1]
 [2]
 5




---



##### 



[a]
 [b]
 [c]
 5.03 Effect of Change in Control.
 [1]
 [2]
 6




---



##### 



5.04 Noncompetition Covenant.
 [1]
 [2]
 [3]
    6.00      FORM AND TIME OF DISTRIBUTION
  7




---



##### 



7.00 AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION OF PLAN
 [1] [2] [3] [4]
 8.00 MISCELLANEOUS
 8.01 Assignability.
 8.02 Beneficiary Designation.
 8.03 No Guarantee of Employment or Participation. [1] [2]
 8




---



##### 



8.04 Tax Withholding.
 8.05 Indemnification.
 8.06 No Limitation on Compensation.
 8.07 Governing Law.
 8.08 Resolution of Disputes.
 [1]
 [2]
 [3]
  8.09 Term of Plan.
 9