alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Jack R. Lazar, the chief financial officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 16, 2005



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jack R. Lazar                           
|Jack R. Lazar                               
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1 

### Medina, Dayana

From: Kordzi, Joe

Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:24 AM

To: Medina, Dayana

Subject: FW: Supporting documentation for Entergy White Bluff Wet FGD O&M Costs

Attachments: removed.txt; 2011 S&L O&M Costs.pdf

FYI

From: Triplett, David [mailto:dtripl1@entergy.com]

Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 6:13 PM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Cc: JOHNSON, GEORGE; HANTZ, JOSEPH; McQueen, Kelly; Jeremy Jewell; william.bumpers@bakerbotts.com

Subject: Supporting documentation for Entergy White Bluff Wet FGD O&M Costs

Mr. Kordzi,

I understand you spoke yesterday with Jeremy Jewell and requested additional information regarding the O&M costs for

wet FGD presented in Table 4 of the June 10, 2013 Entergy response to EPA comments regarding the White Bluff FFA.

Please find attached a copy of the table from which these O&M cost estimates were obtained. This table was prepared

by Sargent and Lundy (S&L) as part of a December 2011 study which considered potential costs for implementation of

both Regional Haze and MATS controls at White Bluff. Only those costs associated with potential operation of wet FGD

were utilized for the purpose of the FFA. Unrelated O&M costs (such as activated carbon) were not utilized in the

FFA. These costs were used in the FFA as they were the most recent wet FGD O&M cost estimates available to Entergy

in June 2013. These projected O&M costs are lower than those which were estimated by S&L in the October 2008 Wet

vs. Dry FGD study which was included with our June 2013 response.

If you have any questions regarding the attached documentation, please let us know.

David Triplett, P.E.

Air Lead, Arkansas Environmental Support

Entergy Services, Inc.

8-750-4030 (internal) | (501) 377-4030 (office) | (501) 650-1752 (cell)

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the co rrect file and location.
# C_2021289EN.01001101.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Ministero della Giustizia v GN

(Case C-914/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Principle of equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 6(1) - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 21 - Prohibition of all discrimination on the basis of age - National legislation setting 50 years of age as the age limit for access to the profession of notary - Justification)

(2021/C 289/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Ministero della Giustizia

Respondent: GN

Intervening parties: HM, JL, JJ

Operative part of the judgment

Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which sets 50 years of age as the age limit for participation in the competition for access to the profession of notary, in so far as such legislation does not appear to pursue the aims of ensuring that that profession is practised in a stable manner for a significant period before retirement, of safeguarding the proper functioning of notarial privileges and of facilitating the natural turnover and rejuvenation of that profession and, in any event, goes beyond what is necessary to achieve those aims, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.

---
# Benton - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northeast Mississippi Planning and Development District Executive Director Sharon Gardner Email &#x73;g&#x61;&#114;d&#x6e;&#101;&#x72;&#x40;n&#x65;&#109;p&#x64;&#100;&#x2e;&#99;o&#x6d;The post Northeast Mississippi Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
From: Peterson, Richard

- AMS [ mailto:Richard.Peterson@ams.usda.gov ]

Sent: July

- 21

- 14 12:08 PM

To: Dave Chapeskie

Cc: Shorter, Chere

- AMS; Chilton, Robin

- AMS

Subject: RE: U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple Syrup

- Follow

- Up

Good day Dave:

Thank you for your email of July 20, 2014, inquiring on the status of the proposed maple syrup revision,

and your offer of assistance in addressing any questions.

We are currently carefully reviewing, and evaluating, the public comments we received. The public

comments received may be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov

. Search maple syrup, then open

docket folder, and then view all co mments. Based on the comments we received and accompanying

data, we will determine what, if any, revisions to the standards are warranted. As we evaluate these

comments, we have a couple of questions we hope you may be able to clarify.

1. How did IMSI arri ve at a maximum brix of 68.9o for Grade A?

Concensus decision among maple syrup producer & packer stakeholders was that we require an upper

limit on Brix . 68.9 % Brix is already the upper limit on Brix in Maple Regulations in Vermont and New

Hampshi re. There is absolutely no advantage to going higher than this on Brix

... resultant product is

uncharacteristically thick and the cost of production increases significantly beyond this Brix point.

2. Are you aware of any States or companies develo ping maple syrup grading kits based on the

IMSI proposed color designations other than the Vermont temporary kits with the new color

designations?

Yes . Lovibond International has developed a permanent colour classification kit aligned with the new

grade & classification standard. Other parties have been awaiting government approval of the

new grading and classification standard.

Also, for your information, I am registered for the 2014 Maple Syrup Grading school to be held in

Wolfville, NS on October 20, 21, 2014. I would be also be interested in attending the NAMSC & IMSI

Annual Meeting, a s an observer, if that is possible.

You would be very welcome to attend these meetings as an observer.

Sincere regards,

Richard
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Han Zhihao, certify that this annual report on Form 20-F of Sinopec Shanghai
Petrochemical Company Limited fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
Company Limited.

     Date: June 26, 2003                     /s/ Han Zhihao
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Han Zhihao,
                                            Chief Financial Officer

NOTICE:

This certification is furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and will be retained
by Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes 

 

Are the animals 

sexually intact?

Are the animals in 

slaughter channels?

Are the animals under 

18 months of age?

Are the animals under 18 

months of age (includes both 

single and mixed source)?

Are the animals moving for 

management or grazing 

purposes1 to a federally 

approved2

 market?

No requirements.

Are the animals from 

a single source?

Are the animals 

crossing State lines?

START HERE

Federal Sheep and Goat Official Identification Decision Tree for 

Animals in Interstate Commerce

Identification rules apply when the animal first enters interstate commerce, such as unloading animals at markets, 

sales, exhibitions or other sites where interstate commerce occurs; moving animals across a State line; selling animals 

to an out-of-State buyer; or when people who engage in interstate commerce acquire animals. The animals’ State of 

residence or the recipient State may have additional requirements.

1 Only applies when both premises are owned or leased by the same person and there is no commingling with other unidentified animals from another herd. 

2 An approved market may not accept unidentified mixed source intact animals to identify and sell unrestricted. Such animals must be sold as restricted to 

slaughter. To comply with the regulations, markets must also have a compliance agreement to accept such animals if they are 18 months of age or older. 

3 Owner hauler statement is not needed for officially and individually identified animals that are not in slaughter channels going to an in-State market.
Order entered August 18, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00467-CR

JULIO CESAR SOTO-GALVAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 32930CR

ORDER

Before the Court is the August 16, 2021 request of official court reporter 

Shannon N. Sudderth for an additional twenty days to file the reporter’s record. In 

her request, Ms. Sudderth states the record is due August 16, 2021. Because a 

timely motion for new trial was filed, the record is due on October 15, 2021. In 

light of this, we DENY the request as premature.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
# Pocahontas - Appalachian Regional Commission

- West Virginia University Research Corporation: Inspiring Hope in the Mountain State West Virginia,&#160;though improving in many measures,&#160;has the&#160;most drug overdose deaths&#160;per 100,000 people&#160;of any other&#160;state.&#160;Fortunately, the&#160;Mountain State&#160;also&#160;has an incredible host of ARC partners, local leaders,&#160;and community members committed&#160;to overcoming this challenge.&#160;This list includes&#160;West Virginia University Research Corporation and the Institute for Community and Rural Health (WVU ICRH),&#160;who together are using $500,000 from&#160;ARC’s&#160;INvestments&#160;Supporting Partnerships In Recovery Ecosystems [&#8230;]The post West Virginia University Research Corporation: Inspiring Hope in the Mountain State appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 4-Planning and Development Council Region 4-Planning and Development Council Address 885 Broad Street, Suite 100Summersville, WV 26651 Executive Director John Tuggle Email &#x6a;&#116;u&#x67;&#103;l&#x65;&#64;r&#x65;&#x67;&#52;&#x77;&#x76;&#46;o&#x72;&#103;The post Region 4-Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0


            PHILADELPHIA CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
          (Dollars and Share Data in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                       ------------------------------------------
                                                           1997           1996           1995
                                                       -----------     ----------     -----------
<S>                                                    <C>             <C>            <C>   
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding(1)             12,194         11,880         11,628
                                                                                       
Weighted Average Share Equivalents Outstanding(1)          2,736          2,373          2,049
                                                         -------        -------        -------
                                                                                       
Weighted Average Share and Share Equivalents                                           
Outstanding(1)                                            14,930         14,253         13,677
                                                         =======        =======        =======
                                                                                       
Net Income                                               $16,870        $13,374        $ 9,830
                                                         =======        =======        =======
                                                                                       
Basic Earnings Per Share(1)                              $  1.38        $  1.13        $  0.85
                                                         =======        =======        =======
                                                                                       
Diluted Earnings Per Share(1)                            $  1.13        $  0.94        $  0.72
                                                         =======        =======        =======
</TABLE>



(1)   1996 and 1995 share information restated to reflect a two for one split of
      the Company's common stock distributed in November 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-K FOR
YEAR ENDED 12/31/98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      35,183,405              17,234,130
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,678,197               8,381,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 22,839,020              28,224,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            84,847,308              62,202,401
<PP&E>                                     443,722,829             344,655,169
<DEPRECIATION>                            (45,154,410)            (31,313,969)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             489,949,240             382,281,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,886,954              27,144,276
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                      27
<COMMON>                                       303,453                 260,044
<OTHER-SE>                                 408,368,622             296,477,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               489,949,240             382,281,485
<SALES>                                    399,548,083             311,672,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           399,548,083             311,672,557
<CGS>                                      121,081,247              95,639,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              397,356,865             270,299,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (843,389)               (394,270)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,624,569)             (1,062,417)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,659,176              42,829,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,607,254              15,399,631
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,051,922              27,430,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                    3,381,500                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (329,578)              27,430,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)                    1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                    1.03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.19  


GMH Communities Trust

2005 Executive Officer Cash Bonus Policy  


        On March 28, 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of GMH Communities Trust (the "Trust") approved the performance criteria that will
be used to determine executive officer cash bonus awards for the year ending December 31, 2005. This approval by the Compensation Committee is consistent with the terms of the Trust's existing
employment agreements with Gary M. Holloway, Sr., the Trust's chairman, president and chief executive officer, Bruce F. Robinson, president of the Trust's military housing division, and Joseph M.
Coyle, president of the Trust's student housing division (collectively, the "Employment Agreements"). Under the terms of the Employment Agreements, the Compensation Committee is required to determine
within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, a bonus policy containing relevant goals for the current fiscal year based on individual performance goals for the executives and corporate
performance goals set at threshold, target, superior and outperformance levels. The Compensation Committee has adopted a similar allocation of individual performance goals with respect to the Trust's
other executive officers for 2005. 


        The
performance criteria for the attainment of corporate goals for all executive officers of the Trust include (i) the Trust's funds from operations (FFO) per share for 2005,
(ii) dollar amount of student housing acquisitions for 2005, and (iii) the number of new military housing units obtained under the Trust's military housing privatization projects for
2005. These three corporate performance goals are broken down into specific threshold, target, superior and outperformance levels, and then further weighted with respect to executive officers, as
follows: FFO per share—50%; student housing acquisitions—35%; and military housing unit acquisitions—15%. The individual performance goals with respect to each
executive officer consists of a number of defined responsibilities and business objectives prepared by the respective executive officer and tailored to his position within the Company. 


        Actual
bonuses will be determined by the Compensation Committee based on the satisfaction of the corporate and individual performance goals as described above, and paid in an amount
equal to a percentage of the executive officer's base salary based on the following threshold, target, superior and outperformance levels: Gary M. Holloway, Sr. (threshold—40%;
target—80%; superior—120%; outperformance—200%) Bruce R. Robinson (threshold—40%, target—80%; superior—120%;
outperformance—175%); Joseph M. Coyle (threshold—40%, target—80%; superior—120%; outperformance—175%); John DeRiggi
(threshold—331/3%, target—66 2/3]%; superior—100%); Bradley W. Harris (threshold—20%, target—50%;
superior—75%); and Joseph M. Macchione (threshold—25%, target—50%; superior—100%). 


        The
Compensation Committee will make the final determinations of 2005 cash bonuses payable to executive officers within 90 days after the end of 2005.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
STANLEY J. MILLER, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.

____________________

2010-3120

______________________ Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC1221080274-B-1.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

R. S COTT O SWALD , The Employment Law Group, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. With him on the brief was N ICHOLAS W OODFIELD

.

S COTT D. A USTIN , Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were T ONY W EST , Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Director, and R EGINALD T. B LADES , J R ., Assistant Director.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER , Chief Judge

, N EWMAN and D YK , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk