alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Advisory Agreements for WMT Series B


 Exhibit 10.8 
  

					
	 	  	Two American Lane	  	Tel 203.861.1031
	 	  	P.O. Box 5150	  	Fax 203.552.1501
	 


	  	Greenwich, Connecticut	  	 
	  	06831-8150	  	 
	  	  
 Joseph J. Allessie
	  	 
	  	Senior Vice President	  	 
	 	  	General Counsel	  	 

  
 September 14, 2004 
  
 Eclipse Capital Management, Inc. 
 Attn: General Counsel/Secretary 
 7700 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 500 

Saint Louis, MO 63105 
  
 Re: Advisory Agreements for World Monitor Trust – Series B 
  
 Please be advised that it is anticipated that as of October 1, 2004, all the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the “Prudential Managing Owners”)
of the above stated Trust are owned by Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. f/k/a Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the “Kenmar Managing Owner”). Therefore, with respect to the various advisory agreements currently in effect by and between the Trust,
the Prudential Managing Owner and you, please be notified that the Kenmar Managing Owner has assumed the liabilities and obligations of the Prudential Managing Owner thereunder and will continue to satisfy and perform all liabilities and obligations
thereunder. 
  
 The Kenmar Managing Owner will continue to operate per the
existing advisory agreements. If this is acceptable, please sign both copies of this Letter Agreement and return one copy. 
  

			
	 PREFERRED INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph J. Allessie


	 Name:
	 	Joseph J. Allessie
	 Title:
	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel
	
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

	
	 ECLIPSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ James R. Klingler


	 Name:
	 	James R. Klingler
	 Title:
	 	Senior Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-51165

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHANCE SHAY ALEXANDER, also known as Chance Alexander,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:10-CR-155-1

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Chance Shay Alexander has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Alexander has filed a response and moves to relieve counsel and for

the appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Alexander’s response. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-51165 Document: 00511963855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-51165

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Alexander’s motions to relieve

counsel and for the appointment of counsel are DENIED.

2

Case: 11-51165 Document: 00511963855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
Exhibit 10.130


 


CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDED ADDENDUM


 


This Consulting Agreement Amended Addendum is entered into effective as
of October 1, 2004, and is a supplement to, and modification of, that
certain Consulting Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) by and between F.Y.I.
Incorporated (n/k/a SOURCECORP, Incorporated)
(the “Company”) and David Lowenstein (“Consultant”), dated as of January 1,
2000.


 


1.             Fee Modification.  Effective October 1, 2004, in addition
to the fees contemplated by Section 2 of the Original Agreement,
Consultant’s hourly rate of $140 per hour for services Consultant performs at
the request of, and on behalf of, the Company, subject to the aggregate
compensation limitation under the Original Agreement of $250,000 for any
calendar year, shall no longer be capped at $1000 per day.  The proviso of Section 1 (which relates
to activities not subject to an hourly rate) of that certain Consulting
Agreement Addendum dated as of March 6, 2003 shall remain in effect.


 


2.             Governing Laws.  This Amended Addendum shall in all respect be
construed according to the laws of the State of Texas.


 


3.             Counterparts.  This Amended Addendum may be executed
simultaneously in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute but one and the
same instrument.


 


4.             Effect of Amended Addendum.  Except as specifically amended by this
Amended Addendum, all provisions of the Original Agreement remain in full force
and effect in accordance with their express terms.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amended
Addendum as of the day and year first above written.


 


	
  SOURCECORP, Incorporated

  	
  CONSULTANT

  
	
  (f/k/a F.Y.I. Incorporated)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Thomas C. Walker

  	
   

  	
  /s/ David Lowenstein

  
	
   

  	
  Thomas C. Walker

  	
  David Lowenstein

  
	
   

  	
  Chairman and Chief Development Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

HENRY WATKINS SKINNER

VS. CAUSE NUMBER AP-77,046

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER

The above styled and numbered cause is before this Court on direct appeal from

appellant’s DNA appeal in Cause No. 5216 from the 31st District Court of Gray County.

The Court is of the opinion the following exhibits should be inspected: 

1. State’s Exhibit No. 31A

2. Defendant’s Exhibit Nos. 30, 32, 33, and 38 

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. 34.6(g)(2), the District Clerk of Gray County is ordered to file

these exhibits with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 4th day of September, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 20 DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 th

PER CURIAM

EN BANC

DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory S. Daily, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of iPayment, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 13, 2007 By: /s/ Gregory S. Daily Gregory S. Daily    Chief Executive Officer
# Union - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Three Rivers Planning and Development District Executive Director Vernon R. Kelley III Email &#118;&#x72;k&#64;&#x74;r&#112;&#x64;d&#x2e;&#x63;&#111;&#x6d;The post Three Rivers Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 22, 2010                                             |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                |   |   |   |
| /s/ G. Richard Smith                                                |   |   |   |
|                                                                     |   |   |   |
| G. Richard SmithChief Executive OfficerSunRidge International, Inc. |   |   |   |
|                                                                |   |   |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict SEP for mid-career awards/Clinical candidates.                    

*Date:*                         February 12, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 12:25 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maurizio Grimaldi, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2C218, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9374,                         *grimaldim2@mail.nih.gov*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 22, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28677 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. FILNER:
       H.R. 6275.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The constitutional authority of Congress to enact this 
     legislation is provided by Article I, Section 8 of the United 
     States Constitution (clauses 1, 2, and 18), which grant 
     Congress the power to provide for the general welfare of the 
     United States; to borrow money on the credit of the United 
     States; and to make all Laws which shall be necessary and 
     proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1430]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               CONGRATULATING GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. RODNEY ALEXANDER

                              of louisiana

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride that I rise today 
to congratulate Grambling State University (GSU) on its 111th 
anniversary. This milestone is a testament that GSU is a true leader in 
education.
   Opening on November 1, 1901, GSU was organized by a group of African 
American farmers who wanted to organize and operate a school for 
African Americans in north Louisiana. What began as an industrial 
school, Grambling State shifted its focus to rural teacher education in 
the late 1930s. GSU transformed in the early 1950s into an institution 
that offered students education in the areas of science, liberal arts, 
and business. The university now offers 68 degree programs to its 
students.
   In recent years, Grambling has incorporated new academic programs 
and has added new facilities including a business and computer science 
building and school of nursing. Throughout the university's 111-year 
history, the value of each individual student has always been 
emphasized. GSU continues to be an institution ``where everybody is 
somebody.''
   I commend Grambling State University on this significant milestone, 
and its dedication to positively influencing the lives of its students. 
I ask my colleagues to join me in honoring Grambling State University 
for this momentous occasion.

                          ____________________
```
#### In the Matter of Victor Hattem et al., Petitioners, against Charles A. Silver et al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

August 4, 1959.

*Myron W. Siskin*for petitioners.

*Foster E. Vogel, Corporation Counsel,*for respondents.

*1092Frank A. G-ttlotta, J.

On this application to review the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long-Beach, respondents move to dismiss the petition on the ground that no facts are alleged showing that petitioners are aggrieved parties. (See General City Law, § 82.)

The law is well settled that to he a “ person aggrieved ” one must be specially, personally and adversely affected as distinguished from one who is merely in the general class of a taxpayer whose only interest is to have strict enforcement of zoning regulations for the welfare of the entire community. There must be special injury or damage to one’s personal or property rights as distinguished from the role of being only a champion of causes *(Matter of Blumberg*v. *Hill,*119 N. Y. S. 2d 855).

The petition in the instant case alleges petitioners to be ‘‘ property owners in the immediate vicinity of the property involved in the setback variance ”. There is lacking- any allegation as to how each petitioner is adversely affected. Were this supplied it might have particularized the first allegation and brought petitioners within the definition of aggrieved persons. However the allegation speaks in general terms as to the effect of the board’s decision on the entire community and in that respect tends to bring the petitioners within the *“*champion of causes ” statement above.

In proceedings of this type, where the distinction between who is, who might be, and who is not an aggrieved party plays so important a part, great care should be taken to allege facts which are unequivocal. The term ‘1 immediate vicinity ’ ’ is not legally sufficient to describe or bring one within the sphere of an aggrieved person since it may have various connotations and might well cover all three of the above categories depending upon who is interpreting the phrase and in what connection it is being used. Does it mean petitioners own adjacent property, nearby property, property 10 blocks away or all three!

While it is true that a bill of particulars might clarify the situation, a respondent should not be compelled to make motions where the particular knowledge rests with the pleader and he could easily have alleged it in the first instance.

Motion to dismiss the petition as being- insufficient in law is granted. Petitioners are however, granted leave to serve an amended petition within 10 days from the date of this order. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 1294.)

Short-form order signed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,764
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,387,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,764,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        649
<COMMON>                                          5574
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,077,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,387,418
<SALES>                                        202,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# Wayne - Appalachian Regional Commission

- The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success In 2016, the Natural Capital Investment Fund (NCIFund) partnered with the Hatfield McCoy Trail Authority and Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College (Southern) to drive recreational tourism development in the coalfields of southern West Virginia. Through ARC POWER funding, the partners launched a revolving loan fund dedicated to financing and providing business technical assistance [&#8230;]The post The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- On the Road to Recovery with Reintegrate Appalachia Individuals overcoming substance use disorder (SUD) often face a series of overwhelming obstacles when reentering their communities. Workplace stigmas around addiction, a lack of transportation to services and unsupportive living situations can all stand in the way of successful long-term recovery. To help individuals navigate these types of barriers, Reintegrate Appalachia &#8211; a unique job [&#8230;]The post On the Road to Recovery with Reintegrate Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 2–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Chris Chiles Email &#x63;&#x63;&#x68;&#x69;&#x6c;&#x65;&#x73;&#x40;&#x72;&#x65;&#x67;&#x69;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#50;&#112;&#100;&#99;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;The post Region 2–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (No. 333-49271, No. 333-49271-01 and No. 333-78127) and
Forms S-8 (No. 333-39794, No. 333-29643, No. 333-29647, No. 333-90534, No.
333-91216 and No. 333-91218) of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. of our
reports dated February 11, 2004, except for Note 2 as to which the date is
August 19, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, PA
August 19, 2004
# Murray - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#x62;&#x61;&#117;&#115;ti&#x6e;&#x40;&#x6e;&#119;gr&#x63;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#114;&#103;The post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.