alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4305 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4305

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to prohibit payments of premium 
                  subsidy for harvest price policies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2017

   Mr. Duncan of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to prohibit payments of premium 
                  subsidy for harvest price policies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Harvest Price Subsidy Prohibition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PREMIUM SUBSIDY FOR HARVEST PRICE POLICIES.

    Section 508(e) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(e)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Prohibition on premium subsidy for harvest price 
        policies.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law and 
        beginning with the 2018 reinsurance year, the Corporation may 
        not pay any amount of premium subsidy in the case of a policy 
        or plan of insurance that is based on the actual market price 
        of an agricultural commodity at the time of harvest.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    210,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        147,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,590
<SALES>                                        219,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,555
<CGS>                                          189,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,032
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008064EN.01007002.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/70

---

Action brought on 21 January 2008 — Aayhan and Others v European Parliament

(Case F-10/08)

(2008/C 64/116)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Laleh Aayhan (Strasbourg, France) and Others (represented by: R. Blindauer, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the European Parliament's decision of 25 October 2007 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicants on 21 June 2007 for the purpose of having all the fixed-term contracts between them and the Parliament converted into a single contract for an indefinite period.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament, the Appointing Authority, of 25 October 2007 expressly rejecting the complaint lodged with the Parliament on 27 June 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament, the Appointing Authority, of 25 October 2007 expressly rejecting the complaint lodged with the Parliament on 27 June 2007;

| — | Consider all the fixed-term contracts between the applicants and the European Parliament as a single contract for an indefinite period, continuing in effect beyond 1 January 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consider all the fixed-term contracts between the applicants and the European Parliament as a single contract for an indefinite period, continuing in effect beyond 1 January 2007;

| — | Re-employ all the applicant members of staff on the basis of contracts for an indefinite period with the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

—

Re-employ all the applicant members of staff on the basis of contracts for an indefinite period with the European Parliament;

| — | Grant each applicant member of staff an indemnity in respect of all the periods worked since the beginning of their employment equivalent to the right to paid leave which they have acquired through their work; |
| --- | --- |

—

Grant each applicant member of staff an indemnity in respect of all the periods worked since the beginning of their employment equivalent to the right to paid leave which they have acquired through their work;

| — | Take note of the fact that the applicants regard the decision of 20 April 2007 as the rejection of a complaint and have already brought an action before the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Take note of the fact that the applicants regard the decision of 20 April 2007 as the rejection of a complaint and have already brought an action before the Civil Service Tribunal.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 447 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 447

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12740, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license for the project effective as of 
the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Partnership's  Annual Report
on Form  10-K for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  March 24, 2004

                                          /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                          Title: President and Treasurer

                                          A  signed  original  of  this  written
                                          statement  required by Section 906 has
                                          been provided to CNL Income Fund VIII,
                                          Ltd.  and  will  be  retained  by  CNL
                                          Income Fund VIII,  Ltd. and  furnished
                                          to   the   Securities   and   Exchange
                                          Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5971-S5972]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    RECOGNIZING SHUCKS MAINE LOBSTER

 Ms. SNOWE. Mr. President, my home State has a worldwide 
reputation of excellence in the seafood industry. The natural blessings 
of our rich, rugged coast coupled with our fishermen's hard work and 
commitment to quality is a recipe for success. Maine's seafood industry 
has blossomed to prestige and is known for its superior product. This 
reputation has been cultivated by Maine's industry leaders through 
years of careful quality control and efforts to foster brand 
recognition. I rise today to commend one such company--Shucks Maine 
Lobster of Richmond, ME that exhibits the ingenuity and innovative 
spirit so characteristic of the small businesses in Maine.
  Founded in 2007 by CEO John Hathaway, Shucks Maine Lobster is a 
seafood processing company with an inventive solution to the most 
common predicament with lobster--extracting the meat is so much work. 
Buying wild-caught lobster straight from local fishermen, Shucks then 
processes the whole lobster using highly pressurized water to loosen 
the shell from the meat. The lobsters are then carefully shucked by 
hand and packaged in a vacuum-sealed container for freshness and 
extended refrigerator shelf life. This allows for the lobster meat to 
be extracted whole--no easy feat, I assure you. This unique method 
yields fresh, never cooked, preshucked lobster meat that is now 
available on a large commercial scale.

[[Page S5972]]

  It is through the exceptional effort of companies such as Shucks 
Maine Lobster that Maine's seafood industry has garnered its world 
renowned reputation for premium quality products. The worldwide acclaim 
Shucks Maine Lobster continues to receive at international food shows 
and chef competitions adds to the long tradition of Maine's superior 
seafood. Their well-deserved accolades also promote Maine as a brand. 
By producing such a delicious and more user-friendly way to enjoy 
Maine's fresh lobster, Shucks introduces and expands to new markets and 
furthers the positive reputation of all Maine seafood.
  The creativity, dedication, and can-do spirit, so characteristic of 
Maine entrepreneurs, can be seen at Shucks Maine Lobster in abundance. 
From a small lobster shack in Kennebunkport to a leader in the frozen 
lobster industry, Shucks has seen both the challenges and rewards of 
seeing an opportunity and sailing towards it. I commend Shucks Maine 
Lobster for all their success and wish them well in the future.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4285 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 333
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4285

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           February 15, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica Hill, New Jersey, as the ``James C. 
                `Billy' Johnson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES C. ``BILLY'' JOHNSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica Hill, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``James C. `Billy' Johnson Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James C. 
`Billy' Johnson Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 333

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4285

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica Hill, New Jersey, as the ``James C. 
                `Billy' Johnson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. HAHN:
       H.R. 6323.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       This bill is enacted pursuant to the power granted to 
     Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1 and 18 of the 
     United States Constitution.
```
# C_2008171EN.01002901.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/29

---

Action brought on 23 May 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-223/08)

(2008/C 171/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Huvelin)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by not adopting the laws regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (1) and, in any event, by not having informed the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by not adopting the laws regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (1) and, in any event, by not having informed the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2006/100/EC expired on the date of accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, namely 1 January 2007. At the date of bringing this action, no transposing measure had been adopted or notified to the Commission by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ L 363, p. 141.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1377]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    CELEBRATING THE 50TH WEDDING ANNIVERSARY OF JOHN AND BETTY DODD

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. KENNY MARCHANT

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. MARCHANT. Mr. Speaker, it is with a sense of joy that I recognize 
and celebrate the 50th anniversary of the wedding of John and Betty 
Dodd, two outstanding and esteemed citizens of Farmers Branch, Texas.
  John and Betty were married on August 19, 1962, and have lived in 
Dallas County ever since. They have both led inspiring lives dedicated 
to education and our community. John is a Certified Financial Planner 
and CEO of Honors Academy, a nonprofit organization that operates 
charter schools. He has served as a member of the Dallas Independent 
School District Board, a city council member and the mayor of Farmers 
Branch, and remains active in many community organizations. Betty is a 
teacher and a volunteer and board member at several organizations 
including her children's schools, Prestonwest Republican Women, Farmers 
Branch Civic League, and Farmers Branch Women's Club. Truly, the Dodds 
have been valuable assets in the town that they call home.
  They have raised a family together and are the dedicated parents of 
David Dodd and Angela Dodd Miller. John and Betty are also the loving 
parents-in-law of Shannon and Jon, and grandparents of Justin and 
Caroline Dodd, and Matthew, Caroline, Nathan, and Andrew Miller. The 
Dodds are members of First United Methodist Church in Dallas, Texas.
  Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the 24th Congressional District of Texas, I 
ask all my distinguished colleagues to join me in congratulating John 
and Betty Dodd on 50 years of marriage, a truly noteworthy testament to 
their strong commitment to each other and to the beauty of marriage.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 10.18


 


Corporate Bonus Plan


 


The Zomax Incorporated Corporate Bonus Plan is
designed to pay for performance.  The
Corporate Bonus Plan applies to management of the company eligible to
participate and includes the executive officers.  Plan participants are eligible to receive
cash incentives as well as consideration for possible equity incentives.


 


CASH INCENTIVE


Each executive officer and other eligible plan
participant is assigned a specific targeted annual incentive cash payment, as
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.


 


The cash
incentive has two components.  The first
component is based on achievement of certain performance objectives measured in
the two primary areas of revenue growth and profitability.  The second component involves the grant of
discretionary cash bonuses by the Compensation Committee.  For 2005, the discretionary portion of the
cash incentive represents up to 30% of a plan participant’s total cash bonus
opportunity.


 


STOCK OPTION INCENTIVE


The executive officers and other eligible employees
are eligible to receive equity incentives in the form of stock options and/or
restricted stock at the compensation committee’s discretion. These awards are
generally based on performance.
Owosso Graphic Arts lab results 

Tern Zick to: Christopher Lambesis, Todd Ramaly 05/14/2008 02:46 PM 

From: Terri Zick <tzick@cticompanies.com > 

To: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US©EPA, Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi GentlemenThe set of analytical came back a few minutes ago in draft form. A detection of 0.220 ppm TCE was 

reported. No other VOCs were detected. 

To summarize the data of the grab samples: 

Sample Date Concentration Compound Estimated TCLP 

11/15/07 0.38 mg/kg Trichloroethene 0.019 mg/I 

4/11/08 0.23 mg/kg Trichloroethene 0.0115 mg/I 

4/22/08 0.24 mg/kg Trichloroethene 0.012 mg/I 

5/07/08 0.22 mg/kg Trichloroethene 0.011 mg/I 

The default delisting value that was determined through DRAS is 0.5 mg/I. To make an apples-to-apples 

comparison, I converted the data to an estimated TCLP result using the EPA's divide by 20 procedure, 

although,even if we use the conservative total number, the reported concentrations are below the 

de-listing level. 

We will submit the final analytical data to you this week & should have all of the de-listing petition files to 

you electronically by May 23. 

Please let me know if there is anything else that you will need! 

Thanks again 

Terri Zick 

313-300-7401 

The information contained in this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the 

individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient. or the employee or agent responsible 

to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is 

neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or by 

calling 800-CTI-TODAY and delete the message. Thank You!