alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                         ------------------------------

                          Jaguar Resources Corporation
                        (a British Columbia corporation)

                    Owns 100% of the following corporations:

                                 Star U.S. Inc.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

                                       and

                        Jaguar Resources do Brasil Ltda.
                            (a Brazilian corporation)


                         Star U.S. Inc. Owns 100% of the
                          following three corporations:

                Diamond Operations, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
               Diamond Exploration, Inc. (an Arkansas corporation)
              Continental Diamonds, Inc. (an Arkansas corporation)



































                                   EXHIBIT 22
mEEQ 

SOURCE EMISSIONS SURVEY 

BORAL BRICKS, INC. 

KILN SCRUBBER INLET DUCT 

AND OUTLET STACK (EPN K) 

HENDERSON, TEXAS 

TNRCC PERMIT 21012 

FILE NUMBER 01-245 

INTRODUCTION 

METCO Environmental, P.O. Box 598, Addison, Texas, conducted a source emissions 

survey of Boral Bricks, Inc., located at 1309 Kilgore Drive, Henderson, Texas, on 

August 6, 7, and 8, 2001. The purpose of these tests was to determine the 

concentrations of particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, chlorine 

and sulfur dioxide being emitted to the atmosphere via the Kiln Scrubber Outlet 

Stack (EPN K). The concentrations of particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride, 

hydrogen chloride, chlorine and sulfur dioxide were also determined at the Kiln 

Scrubber Inlet Duct. Testing was performed while the plant was operating at a 

production rate of•l• 

The sampling was performed by the following METCO personnel: Jason Conway 

Project Supervisor, John Allen, Jeremiah Johnson, and Mike Hoskovac. 

The sampling followed the procedures set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, 

Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods•llllllll/lilll•i•; and in the 

"Sampling Procedures Manual, Texas Air Control Board, Revised July t985." 

01-245 -1- 
Z Z Z c5 c5 

Z Z 

01-245 -2-
#### ■In the Matter of Felicita Rodriguez, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Isabel Cordero, et al., Petitioners, against Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

September 14, 1959.

*201
      *Moser & Arye*for petitioners.

*Evans, Orr, Gourlay d Pacelli*for respondent.

Sidney A. Fine, J.

This is an application, pursuant to section 608 of the Insurance Law, for an order permitting the late filing of a notice of intention to file claim against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, created by section 602 of the same statute. Section 608, where the injured person is an infant, permits the court to allow the late filing of a notice of intention only if *“by reason of such disability*” the timely filing of the notice is prevented. This language is substantially identical with that used in subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. In *Matter of Barrett*v. *City of New York*(1 A D 2d 993) the Appellate Division in this Department held that the failure to file the notice required by section 50-e *(supra)*was not excused, despite claimant’s infancy, where it was due not to the infancy but to the alleged inability of the claimant’s attorney to ascertain the ownership of the property. It follows that the' excuse given here, viz., that claimant’s attorney was not aware of the statutory requirement, may not prevail. The failure to file was not due to infancy.

Motion denied.
December 23, 2016

Mr. Shawn Martinelli

720 4 th Street Sutersville, PA 15083

Dear Mr. Martinelli:

This is in response to your letter, dated March 9, 2016, sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2016-4766) petitioning the Federal Av iation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from the requirements in FAA Order 8900.2 for appointment as a Designated Maintenance Examiner (DME), specifically, the experience requirements for concurrently and actively exercising the privileges of a valid aviation mechanic certificate while also employed by an FAA Aviation Maintenance Technician School.

The relief you seek is not a regulatory requirement, therefore your petition for exemption is being dismissed. However, a blanket devia tion was issued by the Regulatory and Support Division, AFS-600, to FAA Order 8900.2A in Februa ry of this year that may address your concern. This has been enclosed for your reference. If you seek further relief, you would need to submit another request for deviation to AFS-600.

Sincerely,

/s/ James Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Buffalo Asbestos Disposal Corp., Appellant, v State University Construction Fund, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Fallon, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fallon, J. — Article 78.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1414]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        IN HONOR OF CHUCK RUNION

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. WALTER B. JONES

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. JONES. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take a moment to honor Chief 
Petty Officer Charles Clinton Runion, U.S. Navy Retired, who resides in 
Washington, NC.
  Mr. Runion was born in Irwin, TN, on August 7, 1923, and over his 
lifetime he has served his country and distinguished himself as a role 
model in patriotism.
  In October of 1940, Mr. Runion enlisted in the United States Navy and 
served his country for 24 years before retiring. As a successful Navy 
pilot during WWII and the Korean War, he has flown over 80 different 
aviation vessels throughout his military and civilian life.
  Mr. Runion has had the honor and privilege to fly many important 
people of the time. He has flown President Gerald Ford and First Lady 
Mamie Eisenhower. He flew First Lady Jackie Kennedy from Washington, 
DC, to Growton, Connecticut, to launch the USS Lafayette nuclear 
submarine. Mr. Runion continued his streak of flying the country's most 
important into the 1960's with Hubert Humphrey, Lady Bird Johnson and 
Tennessee Congressman Jimmy Quillen.
  Throughout his career, Chuck Runion has been honored with many 
accolades. He has been awarded an air medal with gold star, Navy unit 
commendation, an American defense letter ``A,'' an American/European 
Pacific theater medal, a WWII victory medal, a Korean unit commendation 
and a good conduct medal with four stars. He also earned a humanitarian 
ribbon and a Berlin airlift ribbon. Mr. Runion's last flight was on 
Aug. 7, 2011--his 88th birthday.
  Mr. Speaker, Chuck Runion is part of the Greatest Generation. Like 
most members of this generation, when the war was over they came home 
and became an important part of the community. Mr. Runion not only 
became an important part of his community, but he was able to continue 
his love of flying.
  I have been fortunate enough to visit Mr. and Mrs. Runion at their 
home. I was pleased to look through the scrapbooks from Mr. Runion's 
years of service to this country. That is why today I want to recognize 
him on the floor of the House of Representatives.
  Mr. Runion remains active in his community and remains involved in 
current political issues. He is a member of Wanoca Presbyterian Church 
in Washington, NC, and has a good friend in Pastor Travis Boyd. I am 
honored to represent such a fine man who has been such an asset to our 
country and pleased to have him recognized by the United States 
Congress.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         151,813
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,446
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                37,766
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    901,640
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          88,371
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            88,627
<LOANS>                                      2,932,396
<ALLOWANCE>                                     35,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,263,034
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,551,726
<SHORT-TERM>                                   186,782
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             40,234
<LONG-TERM>                                    107,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,093
<COMMON>                                       199,038
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,263,034
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                257,355
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               61,240
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,455
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               323,050
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             137,288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,936
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          172,114
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,713
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,553
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                149,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,514
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      77,514
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,150
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.55
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,690
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,395
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   491
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                33,315
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,121
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,495
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               35,401
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,794
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         17,607
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.26



FIRST AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE



This First Amendment to Ground Lease (Amendment) is made and entered into effective as of the 15thday of January, 2004 by and between Landrys Management, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (Landlord), and
610 Loop Venture, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company (Tenant).



WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Ground Lease Agreement (Ground Lease) effective as of the 12thday of May, 1999; and



WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to extend the primary term of the Ground Lease.



NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is whereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:



|1. | Paragraph 1(a) of the Ground Lease is hereby amended to change the termination date from May 31st, 2004 to May 31st, 2009.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Except as provided for in this Amendment, the Ground Lease and all other terms contained therein shall remain in full force and effect.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to be
effective as of the date provided hereinabove.



LANDLORD: Landrys
Management, L.P., a Delaware corporation  By:   Landrys G.P., Inc., a Delaware corporation, general partnerBy:Name: Joe Max Taylor Title: Authorized Signature




MANAGER: 610 Loop Venture,
L.L.C., a Texas limited liability companyBy:Name: Tilman J. Fertitta Title: Manager
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The  undersigned  officer  of Summit Financial Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, and in connection with this
Annual  Report  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report),
that,  to  such  officer's  knowledge:

(1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as  applicable,  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March  17,  2003

/s/  J.  Randolph  Potter
-------------------------
J.  Randolph  Potter,  President  and
Chief  Executive  Officer
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Command Center, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2011 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff R. Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.





It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





Dated:  May 13, 2011







/s/Jeff R. MitchellJeff R. MitchellChief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

RANDY LEE LITTLEBIRD,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 30286

D.C. No. 1:18

- cr

- 00158

- SPW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5 , 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE , Circuit Judges.

Randy Lee Littlebird appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 300

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction

for second degree murder committed on a reservation

, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ § 1111 and 1153 ; strangulatio n on a reservation

, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § § 11 3

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable fo r decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 30286

and 1153 ; and domestic abuse by a n habitual offender

, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 117. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Littlebird contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of

his genuine remorse and acceptance of responsibility

. The district court did not

abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) . The

within

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable i n light of the totality of

circumstances, see id.

, and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 sentencing factors, including

Littlebird’s history and characteristics

, the nature and circumstances of the

offense s , the need to protect the public, and the need to provide just p unishment for

the offense s

. Contrary to Littlebird’s argument, the fact that the 270

- month

sentence he recommended might have also satisfied the sentencing factors does not

show that the 300

- month sentence is substantively un reasonable. See Gall , 552

U.S. at 51

- 52.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1208956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2534283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5642154
<PP&E>                                         1342260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  600003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6918815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3647986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12071
<OTHER-SE>                                     3258758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6918815
<SALES>                                        9390620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9390620
<CGS>                                          6254481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6254481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4460256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1324117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (382000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (942117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (942117)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cathy Persin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of VOYAGER PETROLEUM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




DATE: AUGUST 20, 2007                        /S/ CATHY PERSIN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             CATHY PERSIN
                                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                             (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING
                                             OFFICER)
# C_2010024EN.01007802.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/78

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 October 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-94/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Execution of a judgment - Reimbursement of expenses - Intention of the administration to make a deduction from the invalidity allowance of the official - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Action for damages - Manifestly inadmissible)

2010/C 24/147

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision to claim the costs in Case T-241/03 and an application for damages for the harm suffered by the applicant as a result.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action brought by Mr Marcuccio is rejected as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action brought by Mr Marcuccio is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009, p. 46.

1

---