alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Neville, Plaintiff, *v.*Francine Waring et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

October 15, 1959.

*737*Trotta S Spata*for plaintiff.

*Goldwater & Flynn*for Herbert Kollman and another, defendants.

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Defendants Kollman and One Fifth Avenue Operating Corp. (hereinafter referred to as corporation) move to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Plaintiff alleges in that complaint that he and the defendant Waring entered into a partnership contract under which the partnership would lease and operate the hat checking concession in a hotel owned by the corporation and managed by Kollman and equally share the profits therefrom. He alleges further that the concession was rented and that operation began but that the defendants Kollman and the corporation, with knowledge of the contract between plaintiff and Waring, maliciously induced Waring to breach it.

In order to state a cause of action for wrongful interference with a contract four elements must be present: (1) a specific valid contract for a definite time; (2) defendant’s knowledge of that contract; *(3)*a malicious inducement by the defendant of one of the parties to the contract to breach the contract and the breach thereof; (4) damages. *(Israel*v. *Wood Dolson Co.,*1 N Y 2d 116, 120; *Hornstein*v. *Podwitz,*254 N. Y. 443, 448; *Lamb*v. *Cheney & Son,*227 N. Y. 418, 421.)

In the instant case the complaint sets forth all the necessary elements except a definite time for the contract. Where the contract has been fully performed a definite time need not ncessarily be shown *(Israel*v. *Wood Dolson Co., supra; Hornstein*v. *Podwitz, supra),*but where it is a continuing one it must be shown. *(Campbell*v. *Gates,*236 N. Y. 457; *Lamb*v. *Cheney & Son,*supra;*Luisoni*v. *Barth,*2 Misc 2d 315.) The reason for this latter requirement can readily be appreciated here. If the contract was terminable at the will of either party or was only to run up to the time that it was allegedly breached, no action would lie for wrongful inducement to breach since *738there would then have been no breach. *(E. R. Squibb & Sons*v. *Shapiro, Inc.,*64 N. Y. S. 2d 368.)

Plaintiff asks that the court imply the contract period as being the period of the lease of the hat checking concession, the acquisition of which was the primary purpose of the contract. The court cannot supply the implication requested on the facts pleaded, particularly as no lease period is pleaded.

The motion is granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve a second amended complaint within 20 days after service of a copy of an order herein with notice of entry.

Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 13.2

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ye Guohua, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 30, 2014



By:

/s/ Ye GuohuaName:

Ye GuohuaTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4301 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4301

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, as the ``J. 
                Elliott Williams Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. J. ELLIOTT WILLIAMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``J. Elliott Williams Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Elliott 
Williams Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4301

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, as the ``J. 
                Elliott Williams Post Office Building''.
```
# C_2010234EN.01003002.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/30

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 6 May 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-572/08) (1)

1

()

2010/C 234/50

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 4.5

                                June 3, 1998



VIA FACSIMILE
-------------

CC Investments, LDC


     Re: Exercise of Warrants/Issuance of Common Stock
         ---------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

     This letter confirms that SyQuest Technology, Inc. ("SyQuest") and CC
Investments, LDC ("Warrant Holder") agree as follows:

     1.  Warrant Holder will exercise 1,000,000 shares of Warrant No. 81 it
received in connection with its purchase of the company's Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series 5 at $3.0469 per share to acquire 1,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock for total proceeds of $3,046,900 (the "Proceeds").

     2.  Upon receipt of the proceeds, plus an additional $169.64 representing
the par value for an additional 1,696,372 shares (the "Additional Common
Shares") of the Company's common stock, the Company will issue a total of
2,696,372 shares of common stock to Warrant Holder.

     3.  The Additional Common Shares shall have piggy-back registration rights
so that they will be registered in a future registration statement consistent
with existing Company contractual obligations regarding registrations, provided
however that the Company agrees to register such shares no later than September
25, 1998, subject to delays caused by reasonable business considerations.

     4.  The Proceeds plus the additional $169.64 will be wire-transferred to
the following account:  Bank of America, 1850 Gateway Blvd., 4th Floor, Concord,
CA 94520, ABA #121-000-358, Account #12334-56287.

     5.  The Company will deliver the shares of common stock issued upon
exercise of the warrants in accordance with the terms of the warrants, and it
will direct its transfer agent to deliver such shares electronically without a
restrictive legend provided that Warrant Holder complies with the applicable
prospectus delivery requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and provides
notice to the Company using the attached form.
<PAGE>
 
     The Company acknowledges that Warrant Holder is relying on information
disclosed in the Company's public filings with the SEC and confirms that it is
aware of no material misstatements or omissions in those filings.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:

SyQuest Technology, Inc.                CC Investments LDC
 
 
 
/s/                                     /s/
------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
Thomas C. Tokos                         Authorized representative
Vice President, General Counsel and     John Zigelman
Secretary                               Director
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4247 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 886
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4247

                         [Report No. 115-1119]

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
                            Protection Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2017

   Mr. Budd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

                            January 2, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
                            Protection Act.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Financial Market Freedom 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TITLE VIII.

    (a) Repeal.--Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5461 et seq.) is repealed, and 
provisions of law amended by such title are restored and revived as if 
such title had never been enacted.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is 
amended by striking the items relating to title VIII.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 886

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4247

                         [Report No. 115-1119]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
                            Protection Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 2, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-2225

___________________________ Yahui Song, Ph.D. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Regents of the University of Minneso ta; L. James Nixon, M.D.; Barbara K. Patrick, M.D.; Sheila M. Specker, M.D.; Theodore R. Thompson, M.D.; Kathleen V. Watson, M.D.; John Does 1-15 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

------------------------------ The Rutherford Institute lllllllllllllllllllll Amicus on Behalf of Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________ Submitted: April 2, 2013 Filed: April 5, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________PER CURIAM. Yahui Song appeals the judgment of the District Court 1 granting defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil action under Ru le 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after she failed to comply with an earlier order granting defendants’ motion to compel discovery and admonishing her that noncompliance could result in dismissal. Following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See In re O’Brien , 351 F.3d 832, 836, 839–40 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review; in context of Rule 37 motions, court may find willful disobedience sufficient to support dismissal when party employs delay tactics and disregards court orders). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons provided by the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all of the pending motions.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, Unite d States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5536]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   NEW PREVENTIVE SERVICES FOR WOMEN

  (Mrs. CAPPS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Mrs. CAPPS. Madam Speaker, I rise today to mark a key milestone in 
women's access to affordable health care services. Starting today, and 
thanks to the health care reform law, women will have guaranteed access 
to a host of preventive services in new health care plans, without 
additional costs. These benefits--including annual well-women 
physicals, birth control coverage, and screenings for domestic violence 
among them--are a critical step to ensuring that all women get the care 
they need to stay healthy and treat disease early.
  Far too often, women put off needed care because of the cost; but 
this new coverage benefit makes some of these tough decisions a thing 
of the past, decisions like whether to pay for treatment or to pay for 
groceries.
  As we celebrate this day, we must also remember that these health 
care services continue to be politicized and face many attacks. These 
attacks are not only divisive but an intrusion into women's private 
health decisions. We must stand up to such partisan attacks and support 
these important health care benefits and thus ensure that all women and 
their families have access to affordable preventive care services.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 88427)    

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 34 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-112, CP2024-117.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28049 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Hume, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
14th day of November, 2005.



/s/ Michael Hume
--------------------------------------
Michael Hument
Treasurer, Secretary and Director
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4916]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AMERICAN COMPASSION FOR HIV/AIDS

  (Ms. WOOLSEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. WOOLSEY. Next week, more than 20,000 delegates from around the 
world will convene in Washington for the International AIDS Conference.
  I find it ironic and a little bit sad that, as so many mobilize to 
fight this deadly epidemic, the majority in this body want to cut $150 
million from USAID's global health initiative, which funds AIDS 
prevention efforts.
  When will we learn? Fighting diseases in the developing world is more 
than a matter of humanitarian decency. It's also critical to our 
national security.
  This week, as we debate how much money to appropriate to the Defense 
Department, I hope we will remember that defending America and our 
values isn't just about how many weapons we build, but how many lives 
we save around the world. This is the core truth behind my SMART 
Security proposal, that fighting terrorism and keeping our country safe 
depends less on American military force and more on American 
compassion.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2009256EN.01002601.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/26

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2009 — Parfums Christian Dior v OHIM — Consolidated Artists (MANGO adorably)

(Case T-308/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark MANGO adorably - Earlier national and international word marks J’ADORE and ADIORABLE - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Risk of unfair advantage being taken of the repute of the earlier marks - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2009/C 256/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Parfums Christian Dior (Paris, France) (represented by: F. de Visscher, E. Cornu and D. Moreau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Bianchi, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Consolidated Artists BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2008 (Case R 1162/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Parfums Christian Dior and Consolidated Artists BV

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Parfums Christian Dior to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Parfums Christian Dior to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

1

---