alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011194EN.01001302.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2011 — PJ Hungary v OHIM — Pepekillo (PEPEQUILLO)

(Case T-580/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PEPEQUILLO - Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks PEPE and PEPE JEANS - Restitutio in integrum - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2011/C 194/19

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: H. Granado Carpenter and C. Gutiérrez Martínez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Pepekillo, SL (Algeciras, Spain) (represented by: J. Garrido Pastor, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April and 24 September 2008 (both given in Case R 722/2007-1), concerning the application restitutio in integrum of Pepekillo, SL, and the opposition proceedings between PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) and Pepekillo, respectively.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 September 2008 (Case R 722/2007-1) is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 September 2008 (Case R 722/2007-1) is annulled;

| 2. | The remainder of the action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The remainder of the action is dismissed;

| 3. | OHIM is ordered to bear its own costs, half of the costs of PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) as well as the costs necessarily incurred by PJ Hungary kft for the purpose of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

3.

OHIM is ordered to bear its own costs, half of the costs of PJ Hungary Szolgáltató kft (PJ Hungary kft) as well as the costs necessarily incurred by PJ Hungary kft for the purpose of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of OHIM;

| 4. | Pepekillo, SL is ordered to bear its own costs and half of the costs of PJ Hungary kft. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Pepekillo, SL is ordered to bear its own costs and half of the costs of PJ Hungary kft.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4286 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to carry out a grant program for employers 

to develop and carry out job training programs for veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. LOEBSACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to carry out a grant program for employers to develop and carry out job training 

programs for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Employment 

5 Training Act’’ or the ‘‘VET Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM FOR VETERANS. 

7 (a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

8 Labor, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, 

9 shall award grants to employers to carry out the activities 

10 described in subsection (b). 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4286 IH

1 (b) USES OF FUNDS.—An employer that receives a 

2 grant under this section shall use the grant to enter into 

3 a partnership with a community college to create a job 

4 training program for the purpose of training veterans for 

5 new jobs with the employer. 

6 (c) APPLICATION.—To be eligible for a grant under 

7 this section, an employer shall submit to the Secretary of 

8 Labor an application at such time, in such manner, and 

9 containing such information as the Secretary may require, 

10 which shall include— 

11 (1) a description of the job training program 

12 that the employer seeks to develop and carry out 

13 using the grant; 

14 (2) the community college with which the em15 ployer plans to partner in developing and carrying 

16 out such job training program; and 

17 (3) the number of new jobs the employer seeks 

18 to create as a result of such job training program. 

19 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

20 (1) The term ‘‘community college’’ has the 

21 meaning given the term ‘‘junior or community col22 lege’’ in section 312 of the Higher Education Act of 

23 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1058). 

24 (2) The term ‘‘new job’’, when used with re25 spect to an employer, means a job that— 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4286 IH

1 (A) may include a new position within an 

2 existing job category, and is not a job of a re3 called worker, a replacement job, or any other 

4 job that existed in the employer’s business with5 in the one-year period preceding the date of 

6 hire; 

7 (B) is not a job that existed in a business 

8 operation or substantially similar business oper9 ation of the employer formerly located in an10 other location which was closed or substantially 

11 reduced by the employer; and 

12 (C) results in a net increase in employment 

13 for the employer. 

14 (3) The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the meaning given 

15 such term in section 101 of title 38, United States 

16 Code. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
#### Sylvia McGuiness, Respondent, *v.*Roux Distributing Co., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 11, 1959.

*Hampton Mahoney (William F. McNulty*of counsel), for appellants.

*Selig Lenefsky*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff failed to establish that the hair dye she purchased contained any deleterious substance. This is á necessary element. *(Karr*v. *Inecto, Inc.,*247 N. Y. 360.) The occurrence of skin damage is not such proof unless other possible causes are excluded by competent professional testimony. *(Cahill*v. *Inecto, Inc.,*208 App. Div. 191; see *Karr*v. *Inecto, Inc., supra,*p. 364.)

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant.

Concur — Steueb, J. P., Hoestadteb and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  August 11,   2006

                                                    By: /s/ JOSEPH AZZATA
                                                        -----------------
                                                        JOSEPH AZZATA
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4526 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4526

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for certain 
      obstructions of the enforcement of Federal immigration laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2017

  Mr. Rokita introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for certain 
      obstructions of the enforcement of Federal immigration laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Lawless Actions of 
Politicians (SLAP) Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN OBSTRUCTIONS OF ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    (a) Offense.--Chapter 73 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following;
``Sec. 1522. Certain obstructions of enforcement of immigration laws
    ``Whoever, being a State or local official having custody of an 
individual, knowingly ignores a request from the Federal Government for 
the custody of that individual, if the requesting authority has 
designated that individual as a violator of the immigration laws, shall 
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or 
both''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 73 is amended by adding at the end the following:

``1522. Certain obstructions of enforcement of immigration laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATION STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           9,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         16,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,396
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   290,849
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,213
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (620)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.36)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011252EN.01003201.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Aldi Einkauf v OHIM — Illinois Tools Works (TOP CRAFT)

(Case T-374/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark TOP CRAFT - Earlier national figurative marks Krafft - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 43(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) of Regulation 207/2009) and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

2011/C 252/74

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, L. Kolks and C. Fürsen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Illinois Tools Works, Inc. (Glenview, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 June 2008 (Case No R 952/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Illinois Tools Works, Inc. and Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 June 2008 (Case No R 952/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Illinois Tools Works, Inc. and Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG); |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 June 2008 (Case No R 952/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Illinois Tools Works, Inc. and Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG);

| 2. | orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5715]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick J. Conroy, offered the following 
prayer:
  Dear Lord, we give You thanks for giving us another day.
  We come to You as a Nation in the midst of great uncertainty and 
worry. As people look for causes and solutions, the temptation is great 
to seek ideological position.
  We ask that You might send Your spirit of peace and reconciliation, 
that instead of ascendancy over opponents, the Members of this people's 
House, and all elected to represent our Nation, might work together, 
humbly, recognizing the best in each other's hopes, to bring stability 
and direction toward a strong future.
  This Chamber is now silent, Members gone for the August recess. The 
weather continues to damage crops, the economy continues to struggle, 
sequestration threatens interests of all Americans, from a myriad of 
points of view.
  During these coming weeks, may all Americans find respite from their 
struggles, and may all Members of this people's House find rest and 
resolve to return to the service of these United States as citizens 
empowered by their constituents to address the needs of the Nation.
  May all that is done be for Your greater honor and glory.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY





         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned officer and/or 
director of ANTEC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
which is about to file an annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended on Form 10-K, hereby constitutes
and appoints Lawrence A. Margolis, Daniel J. Distel and James E. Knox and each
of them his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agents, with full power
and all capacities, to sign the Corporation's Form 10-K and any and all
amendments thereto, and any other documents in connection therewith, to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as she or he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.
        
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his or her hand 
and seal as of the 20th day of March, 1998.

                                                /s/   Rod Dammeyer
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    Rod Dammeyer
Exhibit 10.11


 


Summary Description of Hartman Commercial Properties
REIT

Trustee Compensation Arrangements


 


Independent trustees of
Hartman Commercial Properties REIT (the “Company”) are paid an annual fee of
$5,000, $1,000 for each meeting attended, and $1,000 per quarter for committee
meetings attended, payable (at the option of the trustee) in either cash or by
issuing such trustees common shares of beneficial interest in the Company.


 


Although the Company has
not granted any awards under its equity compensation plans to any of our
trustees, the compensation committee may also grant options to purchase common
shares or other incentive awards to members of the board of trustees.


 


All trustees are
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with
attendance at meetings of the board of trustees.


 


Trustees who are
not independent, by virtue of the fact that they are officers of Hartman
Management, L.P., the affiliate management company which manages all of the
Company’s operations, do not receive any separate compensation for services
rendered as a trustee.
# C_2009220EN.01003203.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/32

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Thoss v Court of Auditors

(Case T-545/08) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing an action - Lateness - Absence of excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)

2009/C 220/68

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thérèse Nicole Thoss (Dommeldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Goergen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy and J.-M. Stenier, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 20 March 2006 refusing to allocate to the applicant, the widow of a former Member of the Court of Auditors, a survivor’s pension on the ground that the condition that the couple had to have been married for five years at the time of death has not been satisfied (case registered as F-46/08 and referred by the Civil Service Tribunal).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mrs Thérèse Nicole Thoss is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mrs Thérèse Nicole Thoss is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 5.7.2008 (formerly Case F-46/08).

1

---
Exhibit 13.2

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Zhou Meiyun, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 27, 2017



By:

/s/ Zhou MeiyunName:

Zhou MeiyunTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Eric R. Boyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
12th day of August, 2003.



/s/ Eric R. Boyer
-------------------------------
Eric R. Boyer
President and CEO
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.
# Cameron - Appalachian Regional Commission

- North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director James Chorney Email &#110;&#x63;&#112;&#x72;p&#x64;c&#64;&#x6e;&#99;&#x65;n&#x74;r&#97;&#x6c;&#46;&#x63;o&#x6d;The post North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.