alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.48


 


ZORAN
CORPORATION


Summary of Compensation Arrangements


with Named Executive
Officers and Directors


 


OFFICERS


 


Set forth below is a description of the compensation arrangements for
each of our executive officers.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  2005

  	
   

  
	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  Target Bonus

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Gerzberg, Levy

  	
   

  	
  President/CEO

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  391,000

  	
   

  	
  100

  	
  %

  
	
  Martino, Camillo

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  287,500

  	
   

  	
  87

  	
  %

  
	
  Schneider, Karl

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  241,000

  	
   

  	
  70

  	
  %

  
	
  Shenberg, Isaac

  	
   

  	
  Senior VP,
  Business Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  200,000

  	
   

  	
  60

  	
  %

  
										



 


The executive bonus is based upon both company and individual
performance factors during the bonus period. 
The percentage of bonus payout is based upon achievement of both company
and individual goals and decided upon by the Board of Directors compensation
committee.


 


DIRECTORS


 


The general Zoran Corporation Board of Directors compensation plan
provides the following compensation components for service as board members, for
participation at board meetings, and service on board committees:


 


•                  Annual retainer
fee of $20,000 per Director


•                  Per meeting fee
of $2,000 per Director


•                  Quarterly
committee fee of $2,500 per chairperson of a board committee


•                  Quarterly
committee fee of $1,500 per Director serving on a committee


•                  Initial stock
option grants of 30,000 shares per Director on appointment


•                  Annual stock
option grants of 15,000 shares per Director


 


The majority
of the director stock option grants have been granted pursuant to Zoran’s 1995
Director’s Stock Option Plan.  The initial
options grants become exercisable in installments of one-fourth (1/4) of the
total number of shares on each of the first, second, third and fourth
anniversaries of the date of grant.  The annual
option grants become fully exercisable on the one year anniversary of the date
of grant, subject to the directors continuous service.  Options granted have a term of ten (10)
years.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2280

WILBUR O. BILLY POWERS; HELEN M. BEANE; POWERS PROPERTIES,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

SETH REAVES,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

JANE DOE, 

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:21-cv-03187-JD)

Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Seth Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. John Gatling Hofler, III, HOFLER LAW FIRM LLC, 

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Seth Reaves seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and granting Appellees’ motion to remand for lack of jurisdiction 

the eviction action against Reaves to the state court from which it was removed. “[T]he 

law as it stands today provides that an order remanding a case to the State court from which 

it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a 

case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to [28 U.S.C. §] 1442 or 

[§] 1443 . . . shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.” BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City 

Council of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1536-37 (2021) (cleaned up). The district court 

remanded the case to state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction, and removal 

was not premised on § 1442 or § 1443. We therefore are without jurisdiction to review the 

remand order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IB 

Union Calendar No. 886 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4247 

[Report No. 115–1119] 

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2017 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

JANUARY 2, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4247 RH

A BILL 

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

and Consumer Protection Act. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4247 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Financial 

5 Market Freedom Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TITLE VIII. 

7 (a) REPEAL.—Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall 

8 Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

9 5461 et seq.) is repealed, and provisions of law amended 

10 by such title are restored and revived as if such title had 

11 never been enacted. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

13 in section 1(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

14 Consumer Protection Act is amended by striking the items 

15 relating to title VIII. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 886 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4247 

[Report No. 115–1119] 

A BILL 

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 

Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 

JANUARY 2, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ANNUAL REPORT OF

LANDRYS RESTAURANTS, INC.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Landrys Restaurants, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

Date: September 3, 2010



/s/ Tilman J. FertittaTilman J. Fertitta
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Rick H. LiemRick H. Liem
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


[The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601 (b)(32) of Regulation S-K and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Sections 1350, Chapter 63 of the Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.]
**Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2009 – Longevity Health Products v OHIM – Merck (Kids Vits)**

**(Case T-484/08)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark Kids Vits – Earlier Community word mark VITS4KIDS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25, 38)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 August 2008 (Case R 716/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Merck KGaA and Longevity Health Products, Inc. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Longevity Health Products, Inc. |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark Kids Vits for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 – Application No 3979143 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Merck KGaA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Word mark VITS4KIDS for goods in Class 5 – Community trade mark No 3128196 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs. |
# C_2008092EN.01002303.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/23

---

Action brought on 26 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-87/08)

(2008/C 92/45)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all such laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive (1), or in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all such laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive (1), or in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for implementing the directive into the domestic legal order expired on 31 January 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 241, p. 26.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89478-89479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28467]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee

Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory 
Committee Meeting (#13883) (Hybrid).
    Date and Time: January 18-19, 2023; 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room W 
2210, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Hybrid).

[[Page 89479]]

    Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the 
AAAC website: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/aaac.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carrie Black, Program Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9188, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-2426.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues 
within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual 
interest and concern to the agencies. To prepare the annual report.
    Agenda: To hear presentations of current programming by 
representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to 
astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of 
cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for 
continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving 
them.

    Dated: December 20, 2023.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-28467 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40097

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO IBARRA-IBANEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:06-CR-509

--------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Antonio IbarraIbanez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mark R. Riccardi, Appellant, v ARA Leisure Services et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 5, 1990, which ruled that claimant was not illegally employed and denied his claim for double recovery of workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant alleges that he was illegally employed and therefore entitled to double workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 14-a. Once a copy of claimant’s certificate of employment was produced, thereby showing that his employment was authorized, it was incumbent on claimant to demonstrate that, in fact, Labor Law §§ 132 and 135 were violated *(see, Matter of Salvio v Abercrombie & Fitch Co.,*40 AD2d 1056, 1057). Not only did claimant fail to offer any evidence that he never gave the *961working papers to the employer, but he failed to even claim that the employer did not ask for them or keep them on file *(cf., Matter of Robles v Mossgood Theatre-Saunders Realty,*53 AD2d 972). Claimant therefore failed to meet his burden and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board finding that no illegal employment existed must be upheld. Finally, claimant had every opportunity to fully develop the record and we see no reason to remit the matter now to do so.

Casey, J. P., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Opinion issued August 30, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 2 4
- 00 622
- - C V

——————————— IN RE MARIA SANCHEZ , RELATOR

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator , Maria Sanchez, has fi led a petition for writ of mandamus requesting
that this Court vacate the trial court’s “Rendition on a Divorce Without Children,” signed by the trial court on July 17, 2024

. 1

1 The underlying case is In the Matter of the Marriage of Maria Sanchez and Ysidro Hernandez

. , cause number 2021

- 72513 , pending in the 30 9 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Linda Marie Dunson , presiding.2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
Summary Description of Director Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR 
 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
  
 Members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Mountain National Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) are paid $525 for each Board meeting attended, $175 for each Executive Loan Committee meeting attended, and $125 for
each other Board committee meeting attended. The Chairman of the Board receives a fee of $1,100 for each Board meeting attended.
# C_2012032EN.01001801.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Luxembourg v Commission

(Case T-232/08) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenses excluded from Community financing - Rural development measures - ‘Less favoured areas’ and ‘agroenvironment’ - National systems for management, monitoring and sanctions - Flat-rate financial correction)

2012/C 32/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: F. Probst, Agent, assisted by M. Theisen and K. Spitz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially T. van Rijn, subsequently F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and F. Jimeno Fernández, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2008/321/EC of 8 April 2008 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) (OJ 2008 L 109, p. 35).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
|   | 1. | The Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SQM. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Patricio Contesse G.                  |
|-------------------------------------------|
| Name:  Patricio Contesse G.     |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: June 30, 2011                       |

----
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals 

October 25, 2007 

Meeting Note to the Docket 

Discussion Topics 

On October 25, 2007, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a meeting with a workgroup of interested tribal environmental 

professionals regarding the implementation of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources 

and Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the following: 

 Examples of Delegation Materials Already Submitted to EPA by Tribes 

 Link to Permit Fees Example http://www.navajonationepa.org/programs&Depts.html

 Ideas on How to Conduct Effective Consultation with Tribes
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Carlisha Gentles, Pharm.D., B.C.P.S., C.D.C.E.S., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341. Telephone: (770) 488-1504; Email:                         *CGentles@cdc.gov*.                    

                        The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2023-28615 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P