alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011038EN.01001003.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — EWRIA and Others v Commission

(Case T-369/08) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of iron or steel ropes and cables originating in China, India, South Africa, Ukraine and Russia - Refusal to initiate a partial interim review of the anti-dumping duty imposed)

2011/C 38/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Wire Rope Importers Association (EWRIA) (Hemer, Germany); Câbleries namuroises SA (Namur, Belgium); Ropenhagen A/S (Vallensbaek Strand, Denmark); ESH Eisen- und Stahlhandelsgesellschaft mbH (Kaarst, Germany); Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH (Hemer); Interkabel Internationale Seil- und Kabel-Handels GmbH (Solms, Germany); Jose Casañ Colomar, SA (Valencia, Spain); and Denwire Ltd (Dudley, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. Lieber, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Clyne and H. van Vliet, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 4 July 2008 rejecting the applicants’ request for initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of iron or steel ropes and cables.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Wire Rope Importers Association (EWRIA), Câbleries namuroises SA, Ropenhagen A/S, ESH Eisen- und Stahlhandelsgesellschaft mbH, Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH, Interkabel Internationale Seil- und Kabel-Handels GmbH, Jose Casañ Colomar SA and Denwire Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Wire Rope Importers Association (EWRIA), Câbleries namuroises SA, Ropenhagen A/S, ESH Eisen- und Stahlhandelsgesellschaft mbH, Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH, Interkabel Internationale Seil- und Kabel-Handels GmbH, Jose Casañ Colomar SA and Denwire Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
#### Alfred Diodato, Respondent, *v.*Thomas E. Rosetti, as Property Clerk of Police Department of the City of New York, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 2, 1959.

*781
      *Charles H. Tenney, Corf oration Counsel (Robert L. Ellis*of counsel), for appellant.

*Leon Washor*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The decision of the trial court was against the weight of the credible evidence. Moreover, it was error to exclude evidence of the convictions of plaintiff and his principal witness for the crime of book-making.

The judgment should be reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

Pette and Hart, JJ., concur; Brown, J., dissents and votes to dismiss the complaint on the merits.
# C_2009082EN.01002501.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2009 — Pannon Hőerőmű v Commission

(Case T-352/08 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Commission decision declaring State aid granted by Hungary in favour of certain electricity producers by way of electricity purchasing agreements incompatible with the common market - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency - Balancing of interests)

(2009/C 82/44)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Pannon Hőerőmű Energiatermelő, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Zrt. (Pannon Hőerőmű Zrt.) (Pécs, Hungary) (represented by: M. Kohlrusz, P. Simon and G. Ormai, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Giolito and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for stay of execution of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2008) 2223 final of 4 June 2008 on State aid granted by the Republic of Hungary by way of electricity purchasing agreements.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence R. Hoffman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/    LAWRENCE R.
HOFFMAN                          
|Lawrence R. Hoffman                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 30, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sahra Partida,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sahra Partida
-------------------------------------
Sahra Partida
President and CFO
December 11, 2003
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Lichter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Lichter
-------------------------------------
John Lichter
Chief Executive Officer
November 16, 2004


       CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien DuFort, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sebastien DuFort
-------------------------------------
Sebastien DuFort
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 16, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27823]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 23-14]


D.F. Young, Incorporated, Complainant v. Wallenius Wilhelmsen 
Logistics, Respondent; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

Served: December 13, 2023.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (the ``Commission'') by D.F. Young, Incorporated 
(the ``Complainant'') against Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics (the 
``Respondent''). Complainant states that the Commission has 
jurisdiction over the complaint pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 41301, 40904, 
41102, and 41104 and 46 CFR 515.42.
    Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws 
of Pennsylvania with a principal place of business in Berwyn, 
Pennsylvania and is in the business of providing services as an ocean 
transportation intermediary and operates as a non-vessel operating 
common carrier.
    Complainant identifies Respondent as a corporation organized and 
existing under the laws of New York with a principal place of business 
in Parsippany, New Jersey and as a common carrier of goods by water for 
hire.
    Complainant alleges that Respondent violated 46 U.S.C. 41102 and 46 
CFR 515.42 regarding a failure to establish, observe, and enforce just 
and reasonable practices relating to receiving, handling, storing, and 
delivering property and a failure to pay compensation when the common 
carrier's tariff provides for such payment. Complainant alleges these 
violations arose from a refusal to compensate for freight forwarding 
services on shipments of automobiles in accordance with the terms of 
the applicable tariff following demand for such compensation.
    An answer to the complaint must be filed with the Commission within 
25 days after the date of service.
    The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's 
electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/23-14/. This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of 
Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding judge 
shall be issued by December 13, 2024, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by June 27, 2025.

Alanna Beck,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-27823 Filed 12-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
EXHIBIT 99.1



|                                                               |  |              
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Location                                                       |  | Map Reference
|Cape Bougainville                                              |  | 1, 7         
|Mitchell Plateau                                               |  | 1, 7         
|M.L. 1sa Darling Range                                         |  | 2, 7         
|Juruti  Regional Exploration                                  |  | 8, 9         
|Juruti  Capiranga, Guarana, Mauari                            |  | 8, 9         
|Jamaica  SML130  South Manchester                            |  | 3            
|Jamaica  SEPL530  North Manchester                           |  | 3            
|Suriname  Nassau; Mining Property                             |  | 5            
|Suriname  Kaimangrassie; Mining Property                      |  | 5, 6         
|Suriname  Klaverblad; Mining Property                         |  | 5, 6         
|Suriname  Lely Hills, Lely Bauxite deposit; Mining Property   |  | 5            
|Suriname  Lelydorp 3; Mining Property                         |  | 5            
|Suriname  Moengo Bauxite Deposits, Marowijne Concesssion area |  | 4, 5         
|Guinea  Boke; Mining Property                                 |  | 10           



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO



---

LOGO
Exhibit 8

Exhibit 8  Significant Subsidiaries

Alumina Limiteds significant subsidiaries are as follows:



| |  |  | Alumina International Holdings Pty Ltd  Incorporated in Australia this company holds all entities in the Alumina Groups AWAC joint
venture (except for Alcoa of Australia Limited) through its direct and indirect interests totalling 40% in each of Alcoa World Alumina LLC, Alumina Espanola SA and Alcoa World Alumina Brasil Ltda. It is wholly owned by Alumina.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Alumina Finance Limited  Incorporated in Australia this company issued US$350,000,000 2% guaranteed convertible bonds due to mature in
2013 and convertible into fully paid ordinary shares in the share capital of Alumina Limited.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2010024EN.01007501.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/75

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 — Wenig v Commission

(Case F-80/08) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Disciplinary procedure - Suspension of an official - Withholding of salary - Allegation of serious fault - Rights of the defence - Powers - Failure to publish a delegation of powers - Author of the contested measure lacking powers)

2010/C 24/138

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fritz Harald Wenig (Woluwé-Saint-Pierre, Belgium) (represented by: G.-A. Dal, D. Voillemot, D. Bosquet and S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision to suspend the applicant and to order EUR 1 000 per month to be withheld from his remuneration.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 18 September 2008 by which the Commission of the European Communities, pursuant to Articles 23 and 24 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities, suspended Mr Wenig for an indefinite period and ordered an amount of EUR 1 000 per month to be withheld from his remuneration for a maximum period of six months; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 18 September 2008 by which the Commission of the European Communities, pursuant to Articles 23 and 24 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities, suspended Mr Wenig for an indefinite period and ordered an amount of EUR 1 000 per month to be withheld from his remuneration for a maximum period of six months;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the main proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the main proceedings;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear their own costs in the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear their own costs in the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008, p. 59.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             2,936,925
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   3,132,216
<PP&E>                             1,605,242
<DEPRECIATION>                      (311,659)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     6,587,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                826,711
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              4,602,913
<PREFERRED>                        6,745,972
<COMMON>                          19,992,846
<OTHER-SE>                       (25,901,238)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       6,587,168
<SALES>                               40,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      40,000
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    19,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (2,069,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (2,069,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      (2,069,815)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.64)


</TABLE>
# C_2007247EN.01003701.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/37

---

Action brought on 24 August 2007 — Jones e.a. v Commission

(Case T-320/07)

(2007/C 247/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Glenn Jones and Daphne Jones (Neath, Wales), FForch-y-Garron Coal Company Ltd (Neath, Wales), Desmond Ivor Evans and David Raymond Evans (Maesteg, Wales) (represented by: D.I.W. Jeffreys, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Commission Decision of 18 June 2007 in Case COMP/37.037 concerning the applicants' complaint of unlawful price discrimination by the Central Electricity Generating Board; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Commission Decision of 18 June 2007 in Case COMP/37.037 concerning the applicants' complaint of unlawful price discrimination by the Central Electricity Generating Board;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicants' costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicants' costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This is an application lodged pursuant to Article 230 EC seeking annulment of Commission Decision of 18 June 2007 (Case COMP/37.037 — SWSMA) rejecting a complaint according to which pricing practices adopted by the Central Electricity Generating Board in the period 1984 to 1990 in relation to coal producers constituted unlawful price discrimination towards private coal producers including the applicants, which was contrary to Article 4(b) of the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty then in force.

The applicants contend that, in reaching this decision, the Commission has committed a number of fundamental errors of law and/or of appreciation and thus, the decision should be annulled.

The applicants claim that the Commission was wrong as a matter of law to assess the question of price-discrimination on a country-wide basis rather than with reference to the local market in which the complainants operated. Moreover, the applicants submit that the Commission was wrong in stating that the licensed private mines could only supply limited amounts of coal and on a short term basis, taking into account the size of the mining facilities and British Coal Corporation's licensing policy. Finally, the applicants claim that the Commission was wrong to conclude that since the ECSC Treaty has expired and that it no longer enjoys exclusive competence with regards to infringements of the latter, a Commission decision was no longer required before judicial protection was sought before national courts.

---
# C_2013156EN.01003701.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — CISAC v Commission

(Case T-442/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Sharing of the geographic market - Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies - Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences - Proof - Presumption of innocence)

2013/C 156/64

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis and K. Van Hove, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A. Biolan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Broadcasting Union (EBU) (Grand-Saconnex, Switzerland) (represented by D. Slater and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC);

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---