alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008092EN.01001302.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/13

---

Action brought on 24 January 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-26/08)

(2008/C 92/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to develop and implement waste reception and handling plans for all its ports, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to develop and implement waste reception and handling plans for all its ports, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (1);

1

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the Directive into national law expired on 28 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81.

1

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.4


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY






             KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned officer and/or
     director of ANTEC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
     which is about to file an annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended on Form 10-K, hereby 
     constitutes and appoints Lawrence A. Margolis, Daniel J. Distel and James
     E. Knox, each of them his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
     agents, with full power and all capacities, to sign the Corporation's Form
     10-K and any and all amendments thereto, and any other documents in      
     connection therewith, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange 
     Commision, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and 
     authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and 
     necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents 
     and purposes as she or he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying 
     and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their 
     substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue 
     hereof.




             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his or her
     hand and seal as of the 15th day of March, 1997.



                                
                                                 /s/ Mary Anges Wilderotter
                                                 ------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6019

MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA, f/k/a Querrel Devin Glover,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-02185-CCB)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice her civil complaint. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Valenzuela seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order because it is 

possible for her to cure the pleading deficiencies in the 

complaint that were identified by the district court. See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 

1064, 1066–67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11418 

Conference Calendar

 

LOWELL KENT STEVENS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TARRANT COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, Sheriff’s Department,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CV-1713-A

--------------------

June 18, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lowell Kent Stevens, Texas prisoner #0250811, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his pro se and in forma pauperis 42

U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to state a claim,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Even construed

liberally, as required by Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520

(1972), Stevens’ pro se appellate brief does not argue that his

original complaint stated a claim on which relief could be

granted or that his amended complaint was timely filed and stated

a claim on which relief could be granted. Accordingly, Stevens
No. 00-11418 

-2-

has abandoned the only issues properly before this court on

appeal. See Davis v. Maggio, 706 F.2d 568, 571 (5th Cir. 1983)

(holding that issues not pressed on appeal are abandoned). 

Stevens’ appeal is frivolous and must be dismissed. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This dismissal of

Stevens’ appeal as frivolous following the district court’s

dismissal of his lawsuit for failure to state a claim constitutes

two strikes against Stevens for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). If

one other action or appeal filed by Stevens is dismissed on the

ground that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a

claim, he will be barred from bringing a civil action or appeal

as a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Cheever, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prism Software
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date") and

         c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 31, 2005         /s/ Michael Cheever
                              --------------------------------
                              Michael Cheever, Treasurer
# C_2021148EN.01000401.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 March 2021 — European Commission v Italian Republic, Banca Popolare di Bari Società Cooperativa per Azioni, Fondo interbancario di tutela dei depositi, Banca d’Italia

(Case C-425/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Measures adopted by a consortium of banks governed by private law for the benefit of one of its members - Measures authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Whether imputable to the State - State resources - Evidence supporting the conclusion that a measure is imputable - Distortion of elements of fact and of law - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market)

(2021/C 148/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: P. Stancanelli, L. Flynn, A. Bouchagiar and by D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, P. Gentili and S. Fiorentino, avvocati dello Stato), Banca Popolare di Bari SCpA, formerly Tercas-Cassa di risparmio della provincia di Teramo SpA (Banca Tercas SpA) (represented initially by A. Santa Maria, M. Crisostomo, E. Gambaro and F. Mazzocchi, avvocati, and subsequently by A. Santa Maria, M. Crisostomo and E. Gambaro, avvocati), Fondo interbancario di tutela dei depositi (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini, G. Faella and A. Comino, avvocati), Banca d’Italia (represented by: M. Perassi, M. Todino, L. Sciotto and O. Capolino, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.

---
Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual Report of Universal Express, Inc. (the "Company")
on form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Altomare,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15
          (d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           By:    /s/ Richard A. Altomare
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Richard A. Altomare,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:  October 13,  2004



















                                      -26-
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Mechanisms Underlying Heterogeneity of Cognitive Outcomes in Synucleinopathy.                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joshua Jin-Hyouk Park, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208,                         *joshua.park4@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28026 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB



I, R.H. Dillon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /S/    R. H. DILLON    
|                     |  | R.H. Dillon            
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VICTOR A. GARDNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 494 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5536]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        BRIGHT SPOTS IN COLORADO

  (Mr. PERLMUTTER asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. PERLMUTTER. Madam Speaker, it's been a hard summer in Colorado, 
but we have a lot of bright spots. And I want to focus on three today--
one thing and two people.
  The ``thing'' is the patent office. In this country, we've had one 
patent office. It's been here in Washington, D.C. And now we're going 
to have three patent offices across the country, and Colorado got one 
of those. We're going to have a satellite patent office in Colorado, 
and that will help us continue our innovative and entrepreneurial 
spirit.
  Now, of the two people I would like to highlight, one is Chief Dan 
Oates. We had tremendous heroes in this recent tragedy that we had in 
Colorado. But Chief Dan Oates and his leadership of the Aurora Police 
Department were fantastic, and I want to compliment him on that.
  Now, the last person I want to highlight, who is a bright spot and 
will keep getting brighter, is Missy Franklin who has won a bronze 
medal and a gold medal in swimming. And she is going to win a lot more.
  So even though we've had a tough summer, there are a lot of bright 
things and a lot of bright people in Colorado, and it's going to be 
better from here on out.

                          ____________________
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 28, 2018

NO. 03-17-00469-CV

Brandi K. Stokes, Appellant

v.

Christopher Lance Corsbie, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH

AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on July 6, 2017. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. The appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.