alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I., Item 1. of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements. 

(In thousands except per share data, unaudited) 

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-3-1998
<CASH>                                           2,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,261
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               49
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,261
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (96)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0588 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM017AD

84 - 57 - 24 --- 9/30/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
# C_2009220EN.01003101.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-459/08) (1)

1

2009/C 220/60

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 12.2.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1275]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          FORMER PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR WILLIAM WARREN SCRANTON

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. LOU BARLETTA

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 18, 2012

  Mr. BARLETTA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor former Pennsylvania 
Governor William Warren Scranton on the occasion of his 95th birthday.
  Governor Scranton comes from a long line of statesmen and his family 
founded the Northeastern Pennsylvania city of Scranton. After 
graduating from Yale University in 1939, he enlisted in the United 
States Army Air Corps just before World War II. Although he did not see 
combat, he served honorably and remained active in the U.S. Air Force 
Reserves for two decades.
  Governor Scranton's public service began in the 1950s, when President 
Dwight D. Eisenhower appointed him as a special assistant to the U.S. 
Secretary of State in 1959. After a little over a year, Governor 
Scranton was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives for 
Pennsylvania's 10th District. As a freshman member, he fought 
tirelessly for his constituents and fostered bipartisan support for the 
common good. In 1962, he successfully ran for Governor of Pennsylvania, 
defeating then Philadelphia Mayor Richardson Dilworth. During his four 
years in office, Governor Scranton advocated for a strong education 
system, continued industrial development in the United States and 
abroad, and fiscally responsible policy.
  In 1966, Governor Scranton vowed to never run for public office 
again, but his service to the community did not end. From 1967 to 1968, 
Governor Scranton attended the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention 
and helped write a new constitution for the state. Additionally, he 
continued his public service through leadership positions with several 
civic organizations including; director of the Boys Club of Scranton, 
vice president of the University of Scranton's President's Council, 
director of the Scranton Chamber of Commerce, and vice president of the 
board of directors for Geisinger Memorial Hospital.
  After turning down several proposals to run again for public office, 
Governor Scranton accepted an appointment from President Gerald Ford in 
1976 to serve as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations. 
His ability to promote diplomacy and genuine interest in human rights 
earned him favor with many nations and promoted a positive world view 
of the United States.
  Mr. Speaker, today, Governor Scranton embodies the traits, ideals, 
and values which many of us strive to achieve today, and I am honored 
to congratulate him on his many years of dedicated civic service to the 
community of Northeastern Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth, and the 
country.

                          ____________________
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 17-1137 17-1590

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,

v.
AMIT KANODIA,
Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court, issued on November 22, 2019, is amended as follows: On page 5, line 3: "an expiration dates" is replaced with "an expiration date"
# C_2018161EN.01005401.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/54

---

Action brought on 26 February 2018 — Tomasz Kawałko Trofeum v EUIPO — Ferrero (KINDERPRAMS)

(Case T-115/18)

(2018/C 161/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tomasz Kawałko Trofeum (Gdynia, Poland) (represented by: P. Moksa, legal counsel)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferrero SpA (Alba, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘KINDERPRAMS’ — Application for registration No 12 916 961

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2017 in Case R 1112/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | amend the contested decision by registering KINDERPRAMS as an EU trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision by registering KINDERPRAMS as an EU trade mark;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
# C_2013156EN.01003602.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Tono v Commission

(Case T-434/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Sharing of the geographic market - Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies - Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences - Proof - Presumption of innocence)

2013/C 156/63

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tono (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: S. Teigum and A. Ringnes, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and J. Bourke, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns Tono; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns Tono;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs in the main proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs in the main proceedings;

| 4. | Orders Tono and the Commission to each bear their own costs relating to the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Tono and the Commission to each bear their own costs relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.

1

---
# C_2008008EN.01001902.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/19

---

Action brought on 8 November 2007 — Union Nationale de l'Apiculture Française and Others v Commission

(Case T-403/07)

(2008/C 8/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Union Nationale de l'Apiculture Française (Paris, France), Deutscher Berufs- und Erwerbsimkerbund eV (Soltau, Germany), Unione Nazionale Associazioni Apicoltori Italiani (Castel San Pietro Terme, Italy) and Asociación Galega de Apicultura (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) (represented by: B. Fau, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare admissible the application for annulment of Commission Directive 2007/52/EC of 16 August 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare admissible the application for annulment of Commission Directive 2007/52/EC of 16 August 2007;

| — | annul Commission Directive 2007/52/EC of 16 August 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Directive 2007/52/EC of 16 August 2007;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this action, the applicants are seeking the annulment of Commission Directive 2007/52/EC of 16 August 2007, amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant products on the market, to include ethoprophos, pirimiphos-methyl and fipronil as active substances (1).

1

In support of their action for annulment, the applicants are putting forward three pleas.

First of all, they submit that the contested directive was adopted in breach of the procedural rules which, the applicants claim, the Commission was required to comply with. In the applicants' submission, even if the Commission may have been authorised by the Council to adopt, by means of a directive, the implementing measures necessary to apply Directive 91/414/EEC, it does not have the authority to amend that latter directive, in particular with regard to the obligations on the Member States. The applicants submit that the contested directive is not a mere implementing directive but a directive amending Directive 91/414/EEC and, as such, should have been adopted pursuant to the procedure requiring prior consultation of the European Parliament. In the absence of such consultation, it is vitiated by a procedural defect.

In addition, the applicants allege that, under the cloak of amendments to the national authorisation procedures for the placing of plant products on the market, the contested directive in fact infringes the uniform rules of assessment laid down by the basic directive 91/414/EEC with regard to the inclusion of an active substance in Annex I thereto.

---

(1)  OJ L 214, p. 3.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Paul F. Koeppe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, to my knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





/s/  Paul F.
    KoeppePaul
      F. KoeppeNovember
      12, 2009
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Entranet, Inc.


110 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1700


Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301


 


 


Registration Statement


Re: Exhibit 10.3 Oral Agreement


 


To Whom It May Concern:


 


On May 8th, 2014, I, Eleftherios Papageorgiou, transferred my interest
in Enternetinc.com to Entranet, Inc.


 


 


Sincerely


/s/ Eleftherios Papageorgiou


Eleftherios Papageorgiou


Chief Executive Officer


Entranet, Inc.
EXHIBIT 13.1
 
 
 1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Mark E. Jones, III, the Chief Executive Officer of Brazauro Resources Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended January 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report












Dated:  July 9, 2010
/s/ Mark E. Jones, IIIMark E. Jones, IIIChief Executive Officer
# C_2009019EN.01002102.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/21

---

Action brought on 2 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-531/08)

(2009/C 19/39)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by P. Guerra e Andrade and P. Demjek, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies or, in any case, by failing to communicate such provisions to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies or, in any case, by failing to communicate such provisions to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the transposition of the Directive expired on 15 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 310, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID M. KING,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 182 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# C_2009032EN.01003502.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Koinotita Grammatikou v Commission

(Case T-13/08) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Cohesion Funds - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2009/C 32/67)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Koinotita Grammatikou (Greece) (represented by: M Chaïntarlis and A. Papakonstantinou, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and L. Flynn, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 5509 of 21 December 2004 relating to the grant of assistance from the Cohesion Fund for the project ‘Construction of a Landfill Site at the Integrated Waste Management Facility of North-East Attica at the location “Mavro Vouno Grammatikou”’.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Koinotita Grammatikou is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Koinotita Grammatikou is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7357

EUGENE WINGO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus C. M. CREECY, Superintendent of Pasquotank Correctional Institute; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-51-MU) Submitted: February 16, 1999 Decided: March 5, 1999 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Wingo filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Under Fed. R. App. P. 4, parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file their notices of appeal. A district court may extend or reopen the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)&(6), but these are the rule’s only exceptions. The district court entered its order on June 3, 1998; Wingo filed his notice of appeal on September 3, 1998, more than 60 days after the deadline. Wingo did not obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or (6). We therefore deny a certificate of appealability, deny Wingo’s motions for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED