alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.25


 


HOME
FEDERAL BANK


PROMISSORY NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


 


	
  Modification
  #3544

  	
   

  	
  Loan #9206756

  



 


This Agreement is made as
of February 28, 2005, between Home Federal Bank having its office at 225
South Main Avenue, Post Office Box 5000, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57117-5000 (“Lender”)
and Great Plains Ethanol LLC, 27716 462nd Ave., Chancellor, SD 57015
(“Borrower”).


 


RECITALS:


 


A.                                   Lender
is the holder of a Promissory Note of Borrower dated February 28, 2003
payable to the Lender in the original principal amount not to exceed
$1,600,000.00 (the “Loan”).


 


B.                                     Lender
is willing to modify payment terms of the Loan evidenced by the Loan Documents
in the manner set forth below.  These
proposed changes are requested by and acceptable to Borrower.  Borrower acknowledges that the Loan Documents
shall remain the legal and binding obligation of Borrower, endorsers and
guarantors, free of any claim, defense or offset.


 


Accordingly,
in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration,
each paid to the other, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Effective
as of, N/A and until the Loan is fully paid or Lender changes the number of
basis points or the Index, whichever is the first to occur, the unpaid balance
of the Loan shall bear interest at a variable rate of N/A basis points in
excess of the N/A (“Index”).  Lender, at
its discretion, may change the number of basis points or Index upon thirty (30)
days’ prior written notice to Borrower.


 


2.                                       The
unpaid principal balance of the Loan and interest thereon shall be paid in full
on or before March 1, 2006.


 


3.                                       The
maximum amount of the Loan is changed to and shall not exceed $1,125,000.00.


 


4.                                       The
Loan Documents are amended to the extent necessary to reflect the changes set
forth above.  No other amendments are
made to the Loan Documents.  Except as
amended herein, the terms and conditions contained in the Loan Documents, and
the Related Documents described therein, shall continue to govern the
relationship of the parties.


 


5.                                       It
is understood and agreed by the parties that this Agreement shall not operate
as a novation of the Loan Documents or the Loan.


 


6.                                       A
Loan Modification Fee of $2,812.50 will be charged.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto each duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.


 


	
   

  	
  HOME FEDERAL
  BANK

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BY:

  	
  /s/ Terry
  Cleberg

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ITS:

  	
  Vice President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BORROWER:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  GREAT PLAINS
  ETHANOL LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Darrin Ihnen

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  DARRIN IHNEN,
  PRESIDENT
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2576-210]


FirstLight CT Housatonic LLC; Notice of Effectiveness of 
Withdrawal of Application for Amendment of License

    On October 5, 2023, FirstLight CT Housatonic LLC (licensee) filed 
an application for non-capacity amendment of the license for the 114.9-
megawatt Housatonic River Hydroelectric Project No. 2576. On November 
30, 2023, the licensee filed a notice of withdrawal of the amendment 
application. The project is located on the Housatonic River in the 
Fairfield, Litchfield, and New Haven counties, Connecticut.
    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, 
and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. 
Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure,\1\ the withdrawal of the application became effective on 
December 15, 2023, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.216(b) (2022).

    Dated: December 19, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-28437 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45872 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45873 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45874 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45875 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45876 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45877 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45878 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45879 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45880 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45881 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45882 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45883 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45884 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45885 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45886 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45887 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45888 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45889 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45890 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45891 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45892 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45893 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45894 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45895 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45896 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45897 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45898 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45899 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45900 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45901 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45902 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45903 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45904 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45905 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45906 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45907 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45908 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45909 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45910 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45911 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45912 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45913 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45914 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45915 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45916 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45917 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45918 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45919 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45920 1994HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 45921 1994
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,804,875
<SECURITIES>                                19,041,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    596,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,762,156
<PP&E>                                      10,166,537
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,306,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,963,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,114,733
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,776
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,706,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,963,658
<SALES>                                         30,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,275,957
<CGS>                                           13,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,633,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,357,119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,357,119)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,357,119)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                            FOR TYECIN SYSTEMS, INC.

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form  S-3 (No.  333-47133  and No.  333-58353)  and Form S-8 (No.
33-67994, No. 33-67996, No. 33-89490, No. 33-89492, No. 33-98820, No. 333-09481,
No. 333-36983, No. 333-60439, No. 333-62993 and 333-32172) of Manugistics Group,
Inc.  of our report  dated March 6, 1998,  except as to Note 11,  which is as of
June 1,  1998,  related  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  TYECIN
Systems,  Inc. (not presented  separately  therein) which appears on page F-2 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
May 12, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Bumgar dner and Senior Judge Overton Argued at Rich mond, Virginia

ARTIS ORLAND O McDONALD MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0679-99-2 JU DGE RUDOLPH BU MGARDNER, III MAY 16, 2000 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Ernest P. Gates, Judge Designate Elwood Earl Sanders, Jr., Appellat e Defender (S. Jane Chittom, Appe llate Counsel; Public Defender Commission, on briefs), for appellant. Stephen R. McCullou gh, Assistan t Attorney General (Mark L. Earley , Attorney General; Leah A. Darron , Assistant Atto rney General, on brief), for appellee.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication. A jury convicted the defendant of malicious wounding and use of a firearm in the commission of malicious wounding. On appeal, the defendant claims the circuit court lacked jurisdiction because the Commonwealth failed to serve notice of the proceeding in the juvenile and domestic relations district court upon his father as required by former Code §§ 16.1-263 and -264. We conclude the trial court had jurisdiction and affirm

the convictions.Petitions charging the offenses were filed in the juvenile

and domestic relations district court. The offense date was January 10, 1997. The juvenile and domestic relations district court found probable cause and certified the charges. The grand jury indicted the defendant, and the circuit court tried the defendant with a jury, which convicted.

Moore v. Commonwealth , 259 Va. 405, 410, __ S.E.2d __, __ (2000), held that Code § 16.1-269.1(E) cured a defect in a juvenile court proceeding resulting from failure to notify the defendant's father of the proceedings pursuant to Code §§ 16.1-263 and -264. Code § 16.1-269.1(E) applies to offenses committed after July 1, 1996. This offense occurred after that date, and a grand jury indicted the defendant. Accordingly, the indictment cured any defect that occurred, and we affirm the

convictions.

Affirmed.

- 2 -
# C_2008064EN.01004302.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/43

---

Action brought on 17 December 2007 — Nuova Agricast v Commission

(Case T-479/07)

(2008/C 64/70)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Nuova Agricast srl (Cerignola, Italy) (represented by: A. Calabrese, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Decision SG/E/3/MIB/mbp D(2007) 8992 of the Commission of 17 October 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision SG/E/3/MIB/mbp D(2007) 8992 of the Commission of 17 October 2007;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-417/07 Lodato Gennaro & Co.

Lodato Gennaro & Co.

---
19871

#### State v. Mendoza

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5691]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, we are already on S. 3414, which is the 
cyber security bill. The time until 2:15 p.m., is for debate only, and 
the time until 12:30 p.m. will be equally divided between the two 
leaders or their designees. The majority will control the first hour 
and the Republicans the second hour.
  The Senate will recess from 12:30 p.m. until 2:15 p.m. for the weekly 
caucus meetings.
  I will alert everyone to this: I hope those people, led by Senator 
Lieberman and Senator Collins, will work to come up with a finite list 
of amendments so we can move on the cyber security bill.
  I spoke to the Republican leader yesterday and have been very patient 
and tried to get a list of amendments we can agree on. I hope that can 
be done soon. It is very important that we make a determination of 
whether we are going to be able to get a bill. There is not a lot of 
time left to tread water, so to speak.
  This is an important piece of legislation. All one needs to do is 
look at what is going on in India today. There are no cyber problems 
there that I am aware of, but one-half of the country of India is 
without electricity today. Transportation has been shut down, financial 
networks in India, which are significant, are down, and it is a chaotic 
place. There are 600 million people in India who are without 
electricity. As we have been told time and time again, the most 
important issue we have facing this country today for security is 
cyber. We have been told that by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and by the 
head of the CIA. We have been told that by Democrats and Republicans. 
It is an issue that is important, and we have been told it is something 
we can prevent.
  If we don't do this bill, it is not a question of if there will be a 
cyber attack that will be devastating to our country, it is only a 
question of when. It can be stopped. I hope the chamber of commerce 
will get some sense.
  There was a big meeting in the Chamber yesterday. They were moving 
forward on all that was bad about the bill. The problem is they were 
dealing with the wrong bill. So I hope we can get something done. It is 
extremely important that we do.
  There will be a Senators-only briefing today at 5 p.m. in the Visitor 
Center today in SVC-217.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2007283EN.01002901.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/29

---

Action brought on 24 July 2007 — Dimos Peramatos v Commission

(Case T-312/07)

(2007/C 283/53)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Dimos Peramatos (Municipality of Perama, Greece) (represented by: G. Gerapetritis and P. Petropoulos)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the contested measure so that any obligation owed by the applicant to refund sums paid within the framework of the project LIFE97/ENV/GR/000380 ceases or, in the alternative, amend the contested measure so as to oblige the applicant to pay EUR 93 795,32, the sum calculated to be the ineligible expenditure, as the Commission itself has acknowledged; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measure so that any obligation owed by the applicant to refund sums paid within the framework of the project LIFE97/ENV/GR/000380 ceases or, in the alternative, amend the contested measure so as to oblige the applicant to pay EUR 93 795,32, the sum calculated to be the ineligible expenditure, as the Commission itself has acknowledged;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings and in particular the costs incurred by the applicant on lawyers' fees. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings and in particular the costs incurred by the applicant on lawyers' fees.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This application seeks the annulment of the Commission decision of 7 December 2005, served by bailiff on the applicant for the purposes of enforcement on 17 May 2007, relating to Debit Note No 3240504536 which was issued to the Municipality of Perama to recover the financial contribution which had been paid by the Commission in the context of the subsidy granted to the Municipality of Perama by Commission Decision C(97)/1997/29 final.

The applicant pleads an error of fact and incorrect interpretation of the Commission decision. More specifically, the applicant infers that its obligation was exclusively to plant the trees and did not in any event involve their subsequent survival, since any subsequent destruction of the trees could not be attributed to the municipality. Therefore, it considers that its legal obligation was exhausted with regard to provision of the works and it was not possible in that connection to seek the payment of sums from it, except where the documentation submitted did not meet the eligibility conditions laid down by the decision.

Also, the applicant submits that the contested measure infringes the general principle requiring reasons to be stated for measures of the Community institutions and the general principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 33 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-109, CP2024-114.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28048 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021289EN.01000601.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021 — Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA, Harz-Metall GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-563/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for car battery recycling - 2006 Leniency Notice - Point 26 - Partial immunity - Additional facts increasing the gravity or the duration of the infringement - Elements known to the European Commission - Reduction of the amount of the fine - Ranking for the purposes of the reduction - Chronological order)

(2021/C 289/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA, Harz-Metall GmbH (represented by: M. Wellinger, avocat, and by S. Reinart and K. Bongs, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski, I. Rogalski, and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA and Harz-Metall GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA and Harz-Metall GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

/s/  David Salzman
---------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner
of Richman Tax Credit Properties III
L.P., General Partner of the Registrant
August 11, 2005

                                       51