alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009006EN.01000901.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-94/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Posts of ship's captain and chief mate - Nationality clause)

(2009/C 6/15)

Language of the case: Spain

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and L. Lozano Palacios, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: B. Plaza Cruz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 39 EC — Requirement of Spanish nationality for persons occupying the posts of captain and chief mate on certain ships flying the Spanish flag — Incompatibility with Community law.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that in requiring in its legislation Spanish nationality for persons occupying the posts of ship's captain and chief mate of all merchant ships flying the Spanish flag other than merchant ships with a gross tonnage less than 100 GT, which carry cargo or fewer than 100 passengers and operate exclusively between ports or points situated in areas in which the Kingdom of Spain has sovereignty, sovereign rights or jurisdiction, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law and, in particular, under Article 39 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that in requiring in its legislation Spanish nationality for persons occupying the posts of ship's captain and chief mate of all merchant ships flying the Spanish flag other than merchant ships with a gross tonnage less than 100 GT, which carry cargo or fewer than 100 passengers and operate exclusively between ports or points situated in areas in which the Kingdom of Spain has sovereignty, sovereign rights or jurisdiction, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law and, in particular, under Article 39 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-99205; File No. SR-NYSE-2023-41]

                    On November 1, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC (“NYSE”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act” or “Exchange Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder [2]                                          a proposed rule change to amend its Price List to: (1) modify fee rates and requirements for transactions that remove liquidity from the Exchange; (2) offer a monthly rebate for Designated Market Maker units with 150 or fewer assigned securities along with incentives for affiliated Supplemental Liquidity Providers; and (3) eliminate an underutilized fee for transactions that remove liquidity from the Exchange in Tape B and C securities. The proposed rule change was published for comment on November 21, 2023.[3]                                          On December 18, 2023, NYSE withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2023-41).                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[4] 

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98953 (November 15, 2023), 88 FR 81114.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-28326 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Kennedy., Appellant, *v.*Knott.

*Negligence*— Master *and servant*— Injury *to third person*— Liar *bility of master*— Unauthorized *use of master’s automobile.*

An owner of an automobile is not liable for the killing of a pedestrian run down by it, when the chauffeur, without the owner’s knowledge, takes some of his own acquaintances out for a ride, although he intended, during the excursion, to procure lodging for himself in a strange city to which he had brought the owner.

Argued Jan. 23,1919.

Appeal, No. 212, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1917, No. 4270, refusing to take off a non-suit in the case of Anna Margaret L. Kennedy v. Agnes G-. Knott.

Before Brown, C. J., Stewart, Frazer, Walling and Simpson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Action in trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Patterson, J.

From the record it appeared that the plaintiff’s husband was killed by an automobile belonging to defendant and operated by a chauffeur. On the day of the accident the defendant was a resident of New York City, and came to the City of Philadelphia in an automobile driven by her chauffeur. They arrived at a hotel about 5:30 o’clock in the evening. She then dismissed her chauffeur and told him to take the car and store it in a certain garage which was about one-half a square away, until ten or eleven o’clock next morning. She told the driver to get himself a room. He .took the car and stored it for the night in the garage. After getting his supper he returned to the garage about 9 o’clock p. m. and there *27met, among other persons, another chauffeur who asked him if he had a room for the night.. After some conversation he took the car with the intention of taking his acquaintance and others, for a drive, and of securing a room. About 11 o’clock p. m. he had an accident resulting in the killing of plaintiff’s husband within a dozen blocks of the starting point.

The court directed a nonsuit which it subsequently refused to take off in the following opinion:

This nonsuit was entered because the evidence of the plaintiff showed that the chauffeur of the defendant was not engaged in the defendant’s business at the time of the accident. We concur in the ruling and the motion to take off nonsuit is dismissed.

*Error assigned*was refusal to take off the nonsuit.

*Robert T. McOraclcen,*with him *Roberts, Montgomery <& McKeehan,*for appellant.

*Marry S. Ambler, Jr.,*for appellee.

February 17, 1919:

Pee Cubiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below dismissing the motion to take off the nonsuit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the Nine Months Ended September
30, 1996 and the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          39,937
<SECURITIES>                                    28,592
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,261
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,349
<PP&E>                                          34,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,297
<SALES>                                         58,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,726
<CGS>                                            8,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   614
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,613
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,775
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 22, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-11968

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 00-01495-CV-WBH-1

T.C. WOODWORTH, 

KATHLEEN A. WOODWORTH, 

LTW PARTNERSHIP, LP, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

versus 

WILLIAM PARKER HATHCOCK, JR., et al., 

Cross-Defendants-Appellants, 

HARMUT (HARDY) THEODORE ROSE, 

JAMES PAT REEDY, 

GEO SECURITIES, INC., 

GEO-CHEVRON ORTIZ RANCH #2, 

a joint venture, 

THE GEO COMPANIES OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., 

GEO-CHEVRON ORTIZ RANCH #4, 

a joint venture, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

JUDITH WISEMAN, 

Defendant, 
2

GEO NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., 

Defendant-Cross-ClaimantAppellant, 

GEO CHEVRON ORTIZ RANCH #3, 

Interested-Party-Appellant.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________

 No. 06-11988

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 02-00369-CV-WBH-1

KENNETH LEIPMAN, 

KATHLEEN LEIPMAN, 

KIM C. HODGES, 

R. STAN HODGES, JR., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

versus 

WILLIAM PARKER HATHCOCK, JR., et al., 

Cross-Defendants-Appellants, 

JUDITH L. WISEMAN, 

Defendant-Cross-Claimant, 
Honorable Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, United States District Judge for the *

Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

3

JAMES PAT REEDY, 

GEO SECURITIES, INC., 

GEO-CHEVRON ORTIZ RANCH #3, 

a joint venture, 

GEO-CHEVRON ORTIZ RANCH #4, 

a joint venture, 

THE GEO COMPANIES OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., 

HARMUT (HARDY) THEODORE ROSE, 

Defendants-Cross-Clamaints-Appellants, 

GEO NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., 

Cross-Claimant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(January 22, 2007)

Before BIRCH and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and COVINGTON, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Having carefully considered the record and briefs of the parties and after

having entertained oral argument by counsel for the parties, we find no reversible

error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Cassese, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. He moved to suppress the physical evidence on the ground that the search of his person was made pursuant to a warrant which was issued without probable cause. The motion was denied, and subsequently defendant entered a plea of guilty as charged.

*601Defendant contends that the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant application was insufficient as a matter of law. He argues that the hearsay information of two confidential informants relied upon by the issuing Magistrate did not meet the *Aguilar-Spinelli*standard *(see, Aguilar v Texas,*378 US 108; *Spinelli v United States,*393 US 410). We disagree. The suppression court, in a well-reasoned memorandum decision, properly found that both prongs of the *Aguilar-Spinelli*test were satisfied. We thus affirm the denial of defendant’s suppression motion for reasons stated in that decision.

There is no merit to the other issues raised by defendant on appeal. The record demonstrates that his plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered and that the statutory purpose of the predicate felony statement (CPL 400.21) was satisfied *(see, People v Bouyea,*64 NY2d 1140). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5691]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Christopher A. Coons led the Pledge of Allegiance, as 
follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008051EN.01003702.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/37

---

Action brought on 10 January 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-11/08)

(2008/C 51/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by providing in its national law that inspectors who do not fulfil the criteria in Annex VII of Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 on port State control of shipping (1) are accepted if they are employed by the competent authority for port State control on 1 May 2004, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Annex VII of the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by providing in its national law that inspectors who do not fulfil the criteria in Annex VII of Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 on port State control of shipping (1) are accepted if they are employed by the competent authority for port State control on 1 May 2004, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Annex VII of the Directive;

1

| — | order Republic of Malta to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 12(1) of the directive provides, as a main rule, that inspections shall be carried out only by inspectors who fulfil the qualification criteria set out in Annex VII thereof. Paragraph 5 of Annex VII provides, as an exception to this main rule, that inspectors who do not fulfil the criteria in paragraphs 1-4 thereof are accepted if they are employed by the competent authority of a Member State for port State control at the date of adoption of the directive, in other words, on 19 June 1995.

The Act of Accession does not provide for any transitional measures relating to the application of the directive in respect of Malta. In accordance with article 2 of the Act of Accession the provisions of the directive are binding upon Malta from the date of accession.

It is the Commission's view that the Merchant Shipping (Port State Control) Regulations, 2004 (the ‘Regulations’), adopted by Malta to implement the directive, are incompatible with the directive, read in conjunction with the Act of Accession, in so far as they provide that inspectors who do not fulfil the criteria in paragraphs 1-4 of Annex VII of the directive are accepted if they have been employed by the competent authority for port State control between 19 June 1995 and the date of entry into force of the Regulations — in other words, 1 May 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 157, p. 1.

1

---
# Office of the Executive Director - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Executive Director Brandon McBride Brandon McBride joined ARC as the Executive Director in November 2020.The post Executive Director Brandon McBride appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Kelly Wismer The post Kelly Wismer appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Emily Cerna The post Emily Cerna appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Michael Hamilton The post Michael Hamilton appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1452]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                  HON. HENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, JR.

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, Tuesday, July 31, 2012 was the 
date of the primary election in Georgia, and I regret that I was absent 
from votes on that day. However, I would like to make clear my position 
on the bills that received recorded votes:
  (1) S. 679--Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act 
of 2011--I would have voted ``aye.''
  (2) H.R. 828--Federal Employee Tax Accountability Act of 2011, as 
amended--I would have voted ``nay'' on this bill that singles out 
middle class federal workers.
  (3) H.R. 3803--District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child 
Protection Act--I would have voted ``nay,'' against this misguided bill 
that continues the majority's disrespect for the District of Columbia 
and all American women. I am pleased that this bill failed to pass the 
House.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the report on Form
10-Q of SIN Holdings, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Steve
S. Sinohui, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





1)     This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)     The
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Steve S.
Sinhui


Steve
S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer


and Chief
Financial Officer














May 17,
2010.
























A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 1 40 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

## Application **to Amend**

**Section 333 Exemption No.**  **11351 Regulatory Docket No. FAA** **- 2014**  **- 10** **81** June 29 , 2015 **Petitioner:** bizUAS Corp Bernd Lutz, PhD CEO 4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 101 Boulder, CO 80301 Te l: 303.931.4126 Email: bernd@bizUAS.com Website: www.bizUAS.com Greetings, By l etter from the FAA dated April 17 , 2015, an exemption was granted to bizUAS Corp for relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11351 Reg ulatory Docket No. FAA2014- 1081 . bizUAS Corp hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include service - drone Surveying Robot . Re levant facts and reasoning are:  Surveying Robot is part of service - drone’s G4 family of industrial - grade, mission - proven (in Europe) multi rotor UAS . All service - drone G4 UAS use the same flight control and RC transmitter category and are built with similar components . The G4 family includes the service drone Eagle V2 which was approved under bizUAS’ FAA Exemption No. 11351 . The Eagle is larger (in terms of rotor diameter and AUW) than the Surveying Robot .  The findings, rationale and conclusi ons contained in FAA’s Exemption No. 11351 apply without modification to this application to include service - drone Surveying Robot in Exemption No. 11351 . Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any a dditional information that may be required. Sincerely,

Bernd Lutz, PhD CEO, bizUAS Corp
# C_2010148EN.01002202.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/22

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 12 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Tübingen — Germany) — FGK Gesellschaft für Antriebsmechanik mbH v Notar Gerhard Schwenkel, in the presence of: Präsidentin des Landgericht Tübingen

(Case C-450/08) (1)

1

2010/C 148/35

Language of the case: German.

Language of the case: German.

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.03.2009.

1

---