alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         758,003
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,012,247
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,453,654
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,447,157
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,250,081
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,249,890
<LOANS>                                     33,751,250
<ALLOWANCE>                                    418,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,779,816
<DEPOSITS>                                  40,131,132
<SHORT-TERM>                                   461,851
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            129,197
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,032
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,001,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              45,779,816
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,514,205
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               53,459
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               119,743
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,687,407
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             897,156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             909,319
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          778,088
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   71,345
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                730,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,617
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      36,617
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.33
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,481,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    80,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                12,277
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                902,105
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               378,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   52,675
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,330
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               71,345
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        418,000
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the approval of an amendment to the existing Class III gaming compact between the Seneca Nation of Indians and the State of New York.

# DATES:

The amendment takes effect on December 22, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The amendment extends the existing Class III gaming compact between the Seneca Nation of Indians (Seneca Nation) and the State of New York through March 31, 2024, with automatic 90-day extensions thereafter. The Amendment also provides that the present revenue sharing contribution from the Seneca Nation of Indians to the State of New York will continue for the term of the extension and be set aside in an escrow account. The escrowed funds will either be distributed consistent with the terms of a new or amended compact submitted to the Secretary of the Interior and approved by the Secretary or considered approved by operation of law, or through mutual agreement, or pursuant to the Dispute Resolution process in Paragraph 14 of the current compact. The amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-28295 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5709]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia:
       H.R. 6306.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 1 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution, and 
     clause 18 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution.
```
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Brian P. Alleman, Chief Financial Officer of Polar Molecular Holding Corporation, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Polar Molecular Holding Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian P. Alleman   
|Date: April 12, 2004 |  |     |  | Brian P. Alleman       
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 242 (Friday, December 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 78252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32251]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Agency Information Collection Extension

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review; 
comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted an information 
collection request to the OMB for extension under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collection requests a 
three-year extension of its ``Technology Partnerships Ombudsmen 
Reporting Requirements'', OMB Control Number 1910-5188. This 
information collection request covers information necessary to 
implement a statutory requirement that the Technology Transfer 
Ombudsmen report quarterly on complaints they receive.

DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before 
January 17, 2012. If you anticipate that you will be submitting 
comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time 
allowed by this notice, please advise the OMB Desk Officer of your 
intention to make a submission as soon as possible. The Desk Officer 
may be telephoned at (202) 395-4650.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to the:
DOE Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office 
of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10102, 
735 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503; and to
Kathleen M. Binder, HG-6, Director, Office of Conflict Prevention and 
Resolution, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585, Kathleen.binder@hq.doe.gov, (202) 287-1415 
(facsimile).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen M. Binder at the address 
listed in ADDRESSES.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request 
contains: (1) OMB No. 1910-5188; (2) Information Collection Request 
Title: Technology Transfer Ombudsmen Reporting Requirements; (3) Type 
of Request: Renewal; (4) Purpose: The information collected will be 
used to determine whether the Technology Partnerships Ombudsmen are 
properly helping to resolve complaints from outside organizations 
regarding laboratory policies and actions with respect to technology 
partnerships; (5) Annual Estimated Number of Respondents: 22; (6) 
Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: 88; (7) Annual Estimated 
Number of Burden Hours: 50; (8) Annual Estimated Reporting and 
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: 0.

    Statutory Authority:  Section 11 of the Technology Transfer 
Commercialization Act of 2000, Public Law 106-404, codified at 42 
U.S.C. 7261c(c)(3)(C).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 13, 2011.
Kathleen M. Binder,
Director, Office of Conflict Prevention and Resolution, Office of 
Hearings and Appeals.
[FR Doc. 2011-32251 Filed 12-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### In the Matter of David Sardo, Petitioner, v J. Murphy, as Hearing Officer of Mt. McGregor Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner’s confinement in the special housing unit was not due to the filing of the second misbehavior report; he was already in such confinement due to the filing of the first misbehavior report. Accordingly, the requirement that his disciplinary hearing on the second charge be commenced within seven days of his confinement was not applicable *(see,*7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a]; *Matter of Maldonado v Coughlin,*150 AD2d 692) and compliance with the 14-day time period set *973forth in 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 (b) was required. Here, the hearing was completed within 10 days of the filing of the second misbehavior report and was therefore timely *(see, Matter of Young v Coughlin,*144 AD2d 753, *appeal dismissed*74 NY2d 625). Furthermore, the misbehavior report, coupled with the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report as well as the testimony of other witnesses at the hearing, provided substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin,*156 AD2d 806, *affd*76 NY2d 964; *Matter of Garcia v Coughlin,*153 AD2d 1000). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been considered and rejected.

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 8, 2017

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-998

Consolidated: 16-1148

Lower Tribunal No. 14-139 -M

________________



### Tender Loving Care Garden Supply, Inc.

, and Claude Halioua,

Appellants,

vs.



### Jesher's, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Eric Bitney,

Jean Bitney, and Sheila Lawyer

,

Appellees.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig

, Judge.

Cunningham Miller, P.A., and Robert K. Miller

, for appellants.

Campbell & Malafy, and John Campbell and Richard Malafy

, for appellees.

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and EMAS, JJ.

LAGOA, J.Appellants, Tender Loving Care Garden Supply, Inc. (“TLC”), and Claude

Halioua (“Halioua”), appeal from two trial court orders. 1 Specifically, TLC and

Halioua appeal the trial court’s May 25, 2015, Omnibus Order ruling on multiple

motions of both parties, and the April 18, 2016, Order directing the parties to

specifically perform a property sale transaction pursuant to obligations under a

lease option contract.

With regard to the trial court’s May 25, 2015, Omnibus Order, because this

matter remains pending in the trial court, we dismiss the appeal as an improper

appeal taken from a non-final, non-appealable order. See Fla. R. App. P.

9.130(a)(3). With regard to the trial court’s April 18, 2016, Order, we affirm. 2

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part.

1 This case was consolidated with case no. 3D16-1148, which was a prior petition

for writ of prohibition and mandamus that this Court denied on July 28, 2016.

2 We note that this Order is appealable as a non-final order determining the right to

immediate possession of property under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii).

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5537-H5538]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         MIDDLE CLASS TAX CUTS

  (Ms. McCOLLUM asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Ms. McCOLLUM. Madam Speaker, House Democrats and President Obama are 
fighting for families by working to extend middle class tax cuts that 
will benefit 98 percent of Americans. Our plan will put $2,200 in the 
pockets of an average family next year. That's money that can be spent 
by your family on your family's needs. That money will help Minnesota 
businesses grow and hire employees in St. Paul, Roseville, and Oakdale.
  But House Republicans refuse to extend tax cuts for the middle class 
unless millionaires and billionaires get an extra tax cut. It's wrong 
to borrow $50 billion from China so millionaires and billionaires can 
get an extra tax cut of $160,000.
  The Bush tax cuts for the superwealthy built a mountain of debt and

[[Page H5538]]

failed to strengthen the economy. The Bush years proved that the 
Republican love affair with tax cuts for the superwealthy are a 
wasteful handout. They failed to create jobs.
  The American economy is strong when the American middle class is 
strong. I urge my colleagues to vote for the Democrats' middle class 
tax cuts.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Voyager Two, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


8/19/02                                    /s/ Gerry Martin
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

8/19/02                                    /s/ Gerry Martin
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       Principal Financial Officer
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 899 

Expressing support for a stable and sustainable funding source for the 

Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, 

and Ms. TSONGAS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for a stable and sustainable funding 

source for the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical 

Education (THCGME) Program. 

Whereas Congress has established the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) program, 

which is dedicated entirely to training primary-care physicians and dentists in community-based settings, to help 

fill a shortage of primary-care clinicians in the United 

States; 

Whereas teaching health centers are leading innovative educational programming dedicated to ensuring a sufficient 

supply and distribution of primary-care physicians, particularly in rural and underserved areas; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 899 IH 

Whereas the THCGME program has grown from supporting 

63 resident positions in the first year, to more than 700 

in the 2016–2017 academic year; 

Whereas the programs receiving this support are training 

residents in the specialties with the highest shortages nationally, including: family medicine, general internal medicine, pediatrics, geriatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, psychiatry, and dentistry; 

Whereas teaching health centers are located primarily in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), rural health 

clinics, and tribal clinics, all of which care for underserved communities and populations; 

Whereas the size of THCGME remains modest, representing 

in fiscal year 2016 less than 0.5 percent of the annual 

Federal outlay committed to training physicians; 

Whereas the THCGME program delivers value in physician 

training and encourages team-based care that improves 

quality; 

Whereas reports show the THCGME program is helping to 

meet the need of increasing the number of physicians 

choosing to practice primary care, to provide care to underserved populations, and to locate in rural and underserved communities; 

Whereas THCGME funding is unstable in its current form; 

and 

Whereas Congress provided 2 years of bridge funding for the 

THCGME program in section 221(b) of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), 

which passed with overwhelming bipartisan margins in 

both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. 

Senate: Now, therefore, be it 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 899 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Teaching Health Center Graduate 

3 Medical Education (THCGME) Program should be pro4 tected and sustained. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6766

ROBERT E. BUTLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TRACY S. RAY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00077-JRS)

Submitted: August 7, 2006 Decided: September 1, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Butler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Edward Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butler has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED