alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3



 






Exhibit 10.3




SECOND EXTENSION OF AMENDED AND RENEWED OPTION AGREEMENT




          THIS SECOND EXTENSION OF THE AMENDED AND RENEWED OPTION AGREEMENT is entered into as of the
29th day of August, 2004, by and between The Hearst Corporation (“Hearst”), a Delaware corporation,
and Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation.




W I T N E S S E T H




          WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into an Amended and Renewed Option Agreement dated as
of August 29, 2000 (the “Amended and Renewed Option Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into an Extension of the Amended and Renewed Option
Agreement dated as of August 29, 2003 (the “Amended and Renewed Option Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company mutually desire to further extend the Amended and Renewed
Option Agreement as set forth hereinafter;




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Amended and Renewed Option Agreement is hereby amended and extended by
substituting the date of December 31, 2005 for the date of August 31, 2004 in Section 1 of the
Amended and Renewed Option Agreement.




          Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Amended and Renewed
Option Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Unless otherwise defined herein, all
capitalized terms shall have their respective meanings as set forth in the Amended and Renewed
Option Agreement.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this extension of the Amended and Renewed
Agreement as of the date first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THE HEARST CORPORATION	 	HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	/s/ Ronald J. Doerfler
	 	By:
	 /s/ Jonathan C. Mintzer	 	 
	

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	

	Name: Ronald J. Doerfler
	 	 	Name: Jonathan C. Mintzer	 	 
	

	Title: Senior Vice President
	 	 	Title: Vice President, General Counsel and	 	 
	

	and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	Secretary	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	Dated: March 29, 2005
	 	 	Dated: March 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-Q, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,681,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,140,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                   708,584
<INVENTORY>                                 19,207,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,243,796
<PP&E>                                      11,886,877
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,431,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,513,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,623,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    54,838,979
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,051,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,513,466
<SALES>                                     60,452,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,452,721
<CGS>                                       27,750,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,772,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (17,413)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,825,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,750,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,074,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,074,980
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Initial Review Group; Training and Workforce Development Study Section—A Review of Applications for Medical Scientist Training Program and Basic Biomedical Predoctoral T32 awards.                    

*Date:*                         February 20-21, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Isaah S. Vincent, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12L, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-594-2948,                         *isaah.vincent@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28393 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 10.46
 WESTON M. ANDRESS
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE
 THIS SEVERANCE AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE COLONIAL
PROPERTIES TRUST, COLONIAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. WESTON M. ANDRESS
 " "
      1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING SEVERANCE AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE, I FULLY UNDERSTAND ITS TERMS, I
HAVE CONSULTED MY ATTORNEY ABOUT IT OR BEEN GIVEN MORE THAN AMPLE TIME TO CONSULT WITH MY ATTORNEY
ABOUT IT, AND I HAVE SIGNED IT VOLUNTARILY THIS 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND
AND AGREE THAT IN ORDER FOR THIS AGREEMENT TO BE VALID, IT MUST BE SIGNED AND RETURNED BY ME TO
JOHN RIGRISH NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 31, 2008.
 /s/ Weston M. AndressWESTON M. ANDRESSCOLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST/s/ John P. RigrishJohn P RigrishChief Administrative Officer & Corporate SecretaryCOLONIAL PROPERTY SERVICES, INC./s/ John P. RigrishJohn P RigrishChief Administrative Officer & Corporate Secretary 7
#### Town of Niagara, Appellant-Respondent, v City of Niagara Falls, Respondent, and Niagara Recycling, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 1.) City of Niagara Falls, Respondent, v CECOS International, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Town of Niagara, AppellantRespondent. (Action No. 2.)

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Mintz, J. (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Mintz, J. — Declaratory Judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
#### Tarek Jabri, Appellant-Respondent, v Audrey F. Jabri, *238Respondent-Appellant.

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiFede, J.H.O.), dated October 8, 1987, as, *inter alia,*(1) directed that the parties’ children be raised in the Muslim faith, but only to the extent that the children "shall be amenable thereto”, (2) granted him visitation upon the condition that the "children are willing to attend visitation”, (3) directed the payment of child support of $50 per week per child, and (4) equitably distributed the marital property. The plaintiff wife cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same judgment as denied her request for counsel fees.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further findings consistent herewith.

We find that the trial court failed to adequately set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its determination with regard to the equitable distribution of the marital property, and the award of child support *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [g]; [7] [a]). For example, while there was sharply disputed testimony in regard to whether approximately $200,000 maintained by the parties in a Chemical Bank account was derived from the defendant’s inherited property, or from the parties’ earnings during the marriage, the trial court failed to indicate which party’s testimony it found to be credible. The court further failed to make clear and specific findings as to whether any of the plaintiff’s earnings were deposited in the account, and to what extent, if any, the account constituted marital property. Moreover, while the defendant concededly withdrew all of the funds in the Chemical Bank account prior to trial, the court failed to make any determination as to whether the funds were withdrawn for legitimate marital purposes, or whether the husband’s use of the funds constituted a wasteful dissipation of marital property *(see, Lenczycki v Lenczycki,*152 AD2d 621; *Contino v Contino,*140 AD2d 662; *Harrell v Harrell,*120 AD2d 565).

Although this court has the authority to make the necessary findings *(see, Dunne v Dunne,*172 AD2d 482; *Annis v Annis,*147 AD2d 668), we decline to do so in this case. Factfinding is the obligation of the trial court *(see, Goldberg v Goldberg,*143 AD2d 66), and we should require it to make appropriate findings and provide us with its reasoning so that we may intelligently review its decision *(see, Kluge v Kluge,*
      *239159 AD2d 968; *Annis v Annis, supra; Chasnov v Chasnov,*131 AD2d 624). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court for the purpose of making more detailed factual findings, and setting forth reasons for its equitable distribution and child support awards.

No other issues are reached at this juncture. Mangano, P. J., Eiber, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

David and Shelley Stevens, Appellants

No. 06-14-00059-CV v.

Pentair Filtration, Inc., Pentair Residential 

Filtration, LLC, and Sta-Rite Industries, 

LLC, Appellees

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CV-13-

41338). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellants, David and Shelley Stevens, pay all costs of this 

appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 19, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5535]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           STOP THE TAX HIKES

  (Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, let the countdown begin. 
Come January 1, the President and the Democrats plan to raise taxes on 
hardworking families and small business.
  That's right. Instead of reining in their out-of-control spending, 
the President wants all Americans to hand over even more of their hard-
earned money to the Federal Government. It's not smart to raise taxes 
ever, and certainly not in a struggling economy.
  With 3 years of sky-high unemployment across the country, record-
breaking deficits, and countless new rules and mandates coming from the 
White House, the solution is simple: Stop these job-killing tax hikes.
  It's time to rewrite the Tax Code, work on pro-growth tax reform, and 
get this economy working again. Stop the Democrats' massive tax hikes 
to pay for their Big Government agenda. The American people want, need, 
and deserve better.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 13.1

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wang Zhiqing, the President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 27, 2015



By:

/s/ Wang ZhiqingName:

Wang ZhiqingTitle:

President
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 454 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 454

 To amend the Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 
   1996 to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to complete the 
 required 700-mile southwest border fencing by December 31, 2017, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

   Mr. Ross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 
   1996 to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to complete the 
 required 700-mile southwest border fencing by December 31, 2017, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Finish the Fence Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. FENCING ALONG AND OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SOUTHWEST BORDER.

    (a) Fencing.--Paragraph (1) of section 102(b) of the Illegal 
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 
1103 note) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, not later than 
        December 31, 2017,'' before ``construct'';
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B); and
            (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
        subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively.
    (b) Operational Control.--Subsection (a) of section 2 the Secure 
Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note; Public Law 109-367) is amended, 
in the matter preceding paragraph (1)--
            (1) by striking ``18 months after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act,'' and inserting ``December 31, 2017,''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, in consultation with State and local 
        officials along the international border between the United 
        States and Mexico, including border State governors, mayors of 
        border towns and cities, and border sheriffs,'' before 
        ``shall''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008197EN.01000601.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2008 — Glaxco Wellcome GmbH & Co v Finanzamt München II

(Case C-182/08)

(2008/C 197/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Glaxco Wellcome GmbH & Co.

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt München II

Defendant:

Question referred

Do Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now Article 43 EC) or Article 73b of the EC Treaty (now Article 56 EC) preclude legislation of a Member State which, in the framework of a national system of corporation tax credits, excludes the reduction in the value of shares as a result of a profits distribution from the basis of assessment for that tax when a taxpayer who is entitled to a corporation tax credit has acquired shares in a company which is fully taxable from a shareholder who is not entitled to a tax credit, whereas had the acquisition taken place from a shareholder who was entitled to a tax credit such a reduction in value would have reduced the basis of assessment for the tax of the purchaser?

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00373-CV

CAREFLITE AND NATHAN TATON,

Appellants

V.

JEROLD TAYLOR, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 236th District Court

of Tarrant County (236-296553-17)

June 27, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order denying 

Careflite and Nathan Taton’s motion to dismiss is reversed, and the case is remanded 

to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

It is further ordered that appellee Jerold Taylor shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 451 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 451

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate tax and 
                   retain stepped-up basis at death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

 Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. 
 Gosar, Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Jones, Mr. Long, Mr. Messer, 
and Mr. Poe of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate tax and 
                   retain stepped-up basis at death.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanently Repeal the Estate Tax 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE TAX AND RETENTION OF BASIS STEP-UP.

    Effective for estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2016, 
chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5630]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. DeGETTE:
       H.R. 6258.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: ``The Congress shall have 
     Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, 
     to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and 
     general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts 
     and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;'' 
     and Article I, Section 8, Clause 18: ``The Congress shall 
     have Power To make all Laws which shall be necessary and 
     proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and 
     all other Powers vested by the Constitution in the Government 
     of the United States, or in any Department or Officer 
     thereof.''
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5331]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. LEVIN:
       H.R. 16.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The Congress enacts this bill pursuant to Sections 7 & 8 of 
     Article I of the United States Constitution and Amendment XVI 
     of the United States Constitution.
```