alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1360]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         CELEBRATING THE LIFE AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF CARL ADDISON

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. RODNEY ALEXANDER

                              of louisiana

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride and pleasure that 
I rise today to commemorate Mr. Carl Addison on the occasion of his 
95th birthday, which he and his loved ones will celebrate on August 8. 
Mr. Addison has led an incredible life, truly worthy of this 
distinction.
  In 1939, Mr. Addison joined the 6th Armored Cavalry Regiment in 
Oglethorpe, Georgia. The ``Fighting Sixth'' became an integral wing of 
Gen. George S. Patton's Third Army during World War II. Mr. Addison's 
group landed in France on June 8. This team served as a reconnaissance 
squad as they moved across Europe, and was there when Gen. Patton made 
his heroic run to Bastogne to rescue U.S. troops.
  At Bastogne, Mr. Addison was wounded from a gunshot wound to the knee 
and was sent to England for medical treatment. Though scheduled to 
return to the United States for further treatment, he went back to 
France to rejoin his group. His superior officer ensured Mr. Addison 
could stay with the 6th Cavalry, where he remained until the allies 
claimed victory in Europe.
  Mr. Addison returned home to Monroe, LA. in 1945 and married Bea 
Shamblin in the following year. They have one child together, Carl 
Addison, Jr.
  As his family and friends prepare to join together to honor Mr. 
Addison, he continues to exemplify a strong character of leadership and 
dedication. I ask my colleagues to join me in congratulating Mr. 
Addison on this truly significant birthday.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4463 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4463

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6 Doyers Street in New York, New York, as the ``Mabel Lee Memorial 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MABEL LEE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6 Doyers Street in New York, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Mabel Lee Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mabel Lee 
Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 20, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4463

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6 Doyers Street in New York, New York, as the ``Mabel Lee Memorial 
                             Post Office''.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4916]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. Foxx). The Chair will entertain 15 
requests for 1-minute speeches on each side of the aisle.

                          ____________________
```
**Abamectin Focus Meeting Contact Sheet**  **2/20 /2013**  **meeting with Syngenta**

Name Organization Email Christine Olinger HED/OPP Olinger.christine@epa .gov Steve Jarboe BEAD/OPP Jarboe.steve@epa .gov Jessica Rogala RD/OPP Rogala.jessica@epa.gov Laura Parsons PRD/OPP Parsons.laura@epa.gov Nancy Dodd HED/OPP Dodd.nancy@epa.gov Nancy Tsaur HED/OPP Tsaur.nancy@epa.gov Nicholas Federoff EFED/OPP Federoff.nicholas@epa.gov Whang Phang HED/OPP Phang.whang@epa.gov Thomas Harris RD/OPP Harris.thomas@epa.gov Shanna Recore HED/OPP Recore.shanna@epa.gov James Parker BEAD/OPP Parker.james@epa.gov Kris Garber EFED/OPP Garber.kristina@epa.gov Brian Anderson EFED/OPP Anderson.brian@epa.gov Khue Nguyen PRD/OPP Nguyen.khue@epa.gov Claire Paisley

-Jones BEAD/OPP Paisley

-jones.claire@epa.gov Roy Boykin Syngenta Roy.boykin@syngenta.com Chuck Levey Syngenta Charles.levey@syngenta.com Tammy Tyler Syngenta Tammy.tyler@syngenta.com John Abbott Syngenta John.abbott@syngenta.com Jay Overmyer Syngenta Jay.overmyer@syngenta.com
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Request for Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission 
(MACPAC) Nominations

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office.

ACTION: Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 
2009 (CHIPRA) established MACPAC to review Medicaid and CHIP access and 
payment policies and to advise Congress on issues affecting Medicaid 
and CHIP. CHIPRA gave the Comptroller General of the United States 
responsibility for appointing MACPAC's members. The U.S. Government 
Accountability Office (GAO) is now accepting nominations for MACPAC 
appointments that will be effective May 2024. Nominations should be 
sent to the email address listed below. Acknowledgement of receipt will 
be provided within a week of submission.

DATES: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later 
than January 25, 2024, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and 
consideration of nominees prior to appointment.

ADDRESSES: Submit letters of nomination and resumes to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dc0ccceddccceecfdfde2e4e3f9e0e8e3f9fecdeaece2a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92dfd3d1c2d3d1f3e2e2fdfbfce6fff7fce6e1d2f5f3fdbcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corissa Kiyan-Fukumoto at (206) 287-
4808 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea587978f80a89b859b83819a81adae898f81c0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6edcfdfc7c8e0d3cdd3cbc9d2c9e5e6c1c7c988c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a> if you do not receive an acknowledgment 
or need additional information. For general information, contact GAO's 
Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1396.

Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2023-28102 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 11**

**IBIS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIONSTATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARELOSS**

** **
| ** **                                                      | ** ** | **Years Ended December 31,** | ** **  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------|
| ** **                                                      | ** ** | **2004**                                    | ** **  | **2005** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                      | ** ** | **Diluted**                                 | ** **  | **Basic** | ** ** | **Diluted** | ** ** | **Basic** | ** ** | **Diluted** | ** ** | **Basic** | ** ** |
| Income (loss) from:                                             |       |                                        |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Continuing  operations                                          |       | $                                           | (5,641,172  | ) | $ | (5,641,172 | ) | $ | (9,460,547 | ) | $ | (9,460,547 | ) | $ | 404,885 |   | $ | 404,885 |   |
| Discontinued  operations                                        |       | (5,277,369                                  | )           | (5,277,369 | ) | 215,242 |   | 215,242 |   | — |   | — |   |
| Net Income  (loss)                                              |       | $                                           | (10,918,541 | ) | $ | (10,918,541 | ) | $ | (9,245,305 | ) | $ | (9,245,305 | ) | $ | 404,885 |   | $ | 404,885 |   |
| Weighted average common  shares Outstanding                     |       | 10,665,842                                  |        | 10,665,842 |   | 10,737,924 |   | 10,737,924 |   | 10,853,304 |   | 10,853,304 |   |
| Potential common share  equivalents                             |       | —                                      |        |   |   | — |   |   |   | 126,479 |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares  outstanding                            |       | 10,665,842                                  |        |   |   | 10,737,924 |   |   |   | 10,979,783 |   |   |   |
| Earnings (loss) per  common share and common share equivalents: |       |                                        |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Continuing  operations                                          |       | $                                           | (0.53       | ) | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | 0.04 |   | $ | 0.04 |   |
| Discontinued  operations                                        |       | (0.49                                       | )           | (0.49 | ) | 0.02 |   | 0.02 |   | — |   | — |   |
| Net income (loss)                                               |       | $                                           | (1.02       | ) | $ | (1.02 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | 0.04 |   | $ | 0.04 |   |

 

----
Exhibit
10.19


 


Non-Employee
Directors Compensation Plan


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Annual

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Annual

  	
   

  	
  Stock Option Grants(2)

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Cash

  	
   

  	
  No. of

  	
   

  	
  Vesting

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Compensation(1)

  	
   

  	
  Shares

  	
   

  	
  Period

  	
   

  
	
  Chairperson:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Board of
  Directors

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  30,000

  	
   

  	
  8,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  10,000

  	
   

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation
  Committee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  
	
  Governance
  Committee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000

  	
   

  	
  8,000

  	
   

  	
  Immediate

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Committee
  Membership:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Audit

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  10,000

  	
   

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  
	
  Governance

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  	
  4 year

  	
   

  



 










(1) Cash compensation to
be paid quarterly, in advance installments, due prior to the beginning of the
first day of the fiscal year.


 


(2) Stock option grants
to be issued as of the day of appointment, election or re-election to the
Company’s Board of Directors and committees, or as soon thereafter as
practical.


 


In addition to the
foregoing, new non-employee directors receive “welcome grants” of 32,000 shares
that vest equally over 4 years.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bruce B. Nolte, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransCommunity Financial Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2006;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

January 30, 2007

|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/s/ Bruce B. Nolte                 
|Bruce B. Nolte                     
|President & Chief Executive Officer
#### THE NEWTON TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ALLAN M. CHAMBERS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, ALICE L. PERKINS, INTERVENING PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Argued January 17, 1949

Decided February 14, 1949.

*Mr. John R. Perkins*argued the cause for the intervening ■petitioner-appellant.

*Mr. Willis H. Sherred*argued the cause for the complainant-respondent *(Messrs. Morris, Downing & Sherred,*attorneys).

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from w-ill be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Kays in the former Court of Chancery.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.

*For reversal:*None.
# C_2010234EN.01000401.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-171/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 56 EC and 43 EC - Free movement of capital - Portuguese State’s ‘golden’ shares in Portugal Telecom SGPS SA - Restrictions on the acquisition of holdings and on the management of a privatised company - State measure)

2010/C 234/05

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti, M. Teles Romão and P. Guerra e Andrade, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, acting as Agent, and by M. Gorjão Henriques, advogado)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Special shares (‘golden shares’) held by the Portuguese State in Portugal Telecom S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining in Portugal Telecom SGPS SA special rights, such as those provided for in that company’s articles of association for the State and other public sector bodies, allocated in connection with the State’s golden shares in Portugal Telecom SGPS SA, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining in Portugal Telecom SGPS SA special rights, such as those provided for in that company’s articles of association for the State and other public sector bodies, allocated in connection with the State’s golden shares in Portugal Telecom SGPS SA, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 05.07.2008.

1

---
June 4, 2015

Mr. A. Randy Pacheco

68

- 615 Farrington Highway, 14A

Waialua, HI 96791

Dear Mr. Pacheco :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ 105.17 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It exp lains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 2, 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

1882 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public inter est; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division
#### Gotham Credit Corp., Appellant, *v.*Charles W. Mahoney, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 22, 1959.

*Schleimer & Rubin (Joseph Rubin*of counsel), for appellant.

*Charles W. Mahoney,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

The facts as found by the court below are that plaintiff, a credit company, purchased an installment contract made by three persons as co-buyers of an automobile. After making one payment, one Reid, advised plaintiff that he could not continue the payments and suggested that defendant be substituted as the buyer on the contract. Defendant appeared at plaintiff’s office and an agreement was made whereby defendant *736assumed the contract. To induce this agreement plaintiff represented to defendant that insurance could be procured by making a down payment of $25. Plaintiff thereupon turned over the ear to defendant and he drove it to a garage. That same day defendant applied to an insurance broker for a policy and was told that a down payment substantially in excess of $25 was required. Defendant did not procure insurance and, as far as the record shows, made no further effort to do so. He paid the next two installments on the purchase contract and then defaulted'. In this suit on that contract he pleads that the contract was obtained by fraud and has been sustained by the court below on finding the facts as above set out.

Assuming that the representation was made as defendant claims, he was aware of its falsity on the same day. He did nothing to effect a rescission and, on the contrary, affirmed the contract by making the next two payments. When he sought to avoid the contract he did not tender back the car. At that time his garage man asserted a lien on the car for storage, and he did nothing to satisfy the lien.

The alleged fraud would have allowed him to rescind had he elected to do so. His actions show that he did not. His defense therefore fails, and plaintiff is entitled to judgment as demanded in the complaint.

The judgment should he reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $462.73, with interest and costs.

Hofstadter, J.

(dissenting). I dissent and vote to affirm for the reason that in the trial court’s determination it is implicit that defendant did not abandon his effort to obtain insurance and did not realize the futility of attempting to secure it. His discovery of the fraud, then, was delayed and there was no undue delay in rescinding — which is the sole predicate for reversal. It is a grave miscarriage of justice so to find — and beyond the competence of this court.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., and Aurelio, J.; Hofstadter, J., dissents in memorandum.

Judgment reversed, etc.