alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council 
Stillbirth Working Group Meeting

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development (NICHD) Stillbirth Working Group of Council is 
charged with identifying current knowledge on stillbirth and 
prevention, areas of improvement for data collection, current resources 
for families impacted by stillbirth, and next steps to gather data and 
lower the rate of stillbirth in the United States.

DATES: The Virtual Meeting will be held on January 24, 2024, from 9 
a.m. to 3:30 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be open to the public. Individuals who need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed 
below in advance of the meeting. The session will be videocast and can 
be accessed from the NIH Videocasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov/).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this 
meeting, Dr. Natasha H. Williams, Branch Chief, Office of Legislation 
and Public Policy NICHD, NIH, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7510, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c020d180d1f040d421b050000050d011f5e2c020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="721c130613011a135c051b1e1e1b131f0140321c1b1a5c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>, (240) 551-4985.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 285g. 
Any interested person may file written comments with the committee by 
forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice. 
The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and 
when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the 
interested person. Information is also available on the Institute's/
Center's home page: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/advisory, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).

Alison N. Cernich,
Deputy Director, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child 
Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-28444 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Application of Charles R. WOLLASTON for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12864.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 23, 1960.

*960Stansell Whiteside, Altus, for petitioner.

Loys W. Criswell, County Atty., Jackson County, Altus, for respondent.

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original proceeding for writ of habeas corpus brought upon the verified petition of Charles R. Wollaston, wherein he alleges he is restrained of his liberty by the Sheriff of Jackson County, Oklahoma, and has been since September 12, 1959. He alleges the cause of said restraint to be three charges of indecent exposure now pending against him in the District Court of Jackson County, bond of $2,500 having been fixed by the court in each case. He further alleges he was convicted, on December 18, 1959, on a fourth charge of indecent exposure, sentenced to serve a term of three years thereon in the state penitentiary, and appeal bond was fixed at $6,000 thereon. He alleges the aforesaid bonds are excessive for the three offenses charged and the one offense of which petitioner has been convicted, and prays the same be reduced to such sum as the Court deems proper.

To this petition the Sheriff of Jackson County has responded, substantially admitting that the petitioner was charged and confined as aforesaid, but alleging that petitioner has provided an appeal bond and is not being held thereon, and further alleging that total bond of $7,500 is reasonable and proper in view of the three felony charges pending against petitioner.

At the hearing held before this Court on February 17, 1960, it appeared that petitioner had been confined in jail continuously since September 12, 1959, and would not likely be granted a trial on the pending charges until possibly July, 1960. In view of the admitted facts that petitioner has satisfactorily provided an appeal bond in the sum of $6,000, and the protracted nature of the charges now pending against him, the Court is of the opinion that bond in the amount of $1,500 on each of the charges pending against him is sufficient to ensure his presence before the District Court of Jackson County, Oklahoma, when required. It is therefore ordered that the respondent release petitioner from custody upon the presentation of bonds of $1,500 on each charge now pending against him which have been .approved by the Clerk of the District Court of Jackson County, Oklahoma.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
#### Elven Richie, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph N. Richie, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County,

August 14, 1959.

*Frederick Posses*for plaintiff.

*Sidney R. Siben*for defendant.

Feed J. Muhdee, J.

Motion for alimony and counsel fees *pendente lite.*

Plaintiff left the marital home with two of the' children, 9 and *11*years of age, on March 28, 1959. She commenced her action on April 2, 1959 and made the present motion on July 13, 1959. The 11-year-old son, while visiting with the defendant on July *95110,1959, refused to return to plaintiff and elected to remain with his father.

On the proof submitted on this motion there is some question in my mind as to plaintiff’s ability to successfully prosecute this action. Consequently the question of the wife’s support and counsel fee will be reserved for determination by the trial court. In the meantime, however, the defendant will be required to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $15 per week toward the maintenance and support of the child residing with plaintiff.

There is no representation as to whether a note of issue has been filed. If one has been filed, the order to be entered hereon may contain a direction that the action be set for trial at the head of the Special Term Calendar to ensure an early trial in view of the denial of temporary alimony.

Submit order.
# Poverty - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2011–2015 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2011–2015 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2011–2015 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2011–2015 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Rick Scott 

# Florida Department of Governor 

# Environmental Protection jennifer Carroll LL Governor Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building

3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. Secretary November 28,2011

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region4 61 Forsyth Street, Southwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 Dear Ms. Fleming: On October 19, 2011, FranklinE. Hill wrote the Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection (DEP) to solicitthe state ofFlorida's supportfor the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to add the Fairfax St. Wood Treaters site, 2610 Fairfax Street, Jacksonville, Florida, to the National Priorities List (NPL). Based onthe site's contamination in soils, and the responsible party's inability to conductcleanup, the state ofFlorida supports EPA's proposal to list the Fairfax St. Wood Treaters site onthe NPL. We appreciate EPA's assistance in assessing and cleaning up contaminated sites in Florida. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to contact Jorge Caspary, Director of DEP's Division ofWaste Management, at (850) 245-8697. Sincerely,

# (. ) rschel T.

### Vinya~ Jr. Secretary

cc: Jorge Caspary, P.G., Director, Division ofWaste Management, DEP GregStrong, Director, Northeast District, DEP

www.dcp.statdl.us
# C_2009141EN.01004001.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 May 2009 — M v EMEA

(Case T-12/08) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Temporary staff - Invalidity - Application for reconsideration of the decision rejecting a first request that the Invalidity Committee be convened - Action for annulment - Non-actionable measure - Confirmatory act - New and substantial facts - Admissibility - Non-contractual liability - Non-material harm)

2009/C 141/82

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: M (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (EMEA) (represented by: V. Salvatore and N. Rampal Olmedo, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) in Case F-23/07 M v EMEA [2007] ECR-SC I-A-0000 and II-0000 seeking that that order be set aside.

M

EMEA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 19 October 2007 in Case F-23/07 M v EMEA [2007] ECR I-A-0000 and II-0000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 19 October 2007 in Case F-23/07 M v EMEA [2007] ECR I-A-0000 and II-0000;

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) of 25 October 2006, in so far as it rejected M’s request of 8 August 2006 for his case to be referred to the Invalidity Committee; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) of 25 October 2006, in so far as it rejected M’s request of 8 August 2006 for his case to be referred to the Invalidity Committee;

| 3. | Orders EMEA to pay the appellant compensation of EUR 3 000; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EMEA to pay the appellant compensation of EUR 3 000;

| 4. | Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;

| 5. | Orders EMEA to pay the costs of the procedure before the Civil Service Tribunal and those of this case. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders EMEA to pay the costs of the procedure before the Civil Service Tribunal and those of this case.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60945

Summary Calendar

 

WULETAW TEMESGEN

Petitioner

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

--------------------

Petition for Review of a Decision of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals 

BIA No. A78-354-288 

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wuletaw Temesgen (“Temesgen”), a citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming the immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) decision to deny his application for asylum or withholding

of removal. Temesgen argues that the BIA violated his due

process rights by summarily affirming the decision of the IJ and
No. 02-60945

-2-

that this court is unable to provide a meaningful review of the

BIA’s decision. The court has held that the summary affirmance

procedures do not violate due process and do not deprive the

court of a basis for judicial review. Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324

F.3d 830, 832-33 (5th Cir. 2003). 

Temesgen asserts that the BIA and the IJ adopted positions

contrary to the evidence and improperly based their decisions on

evidence that was not a part of the record, namely the existence

of a peace treaty between Ethiopia and Eritrea and the presence

of the peacekeepers in Ethiopia. Assuming arguendo that the IJ

did take judicial notice of facts concerning current events in

Ethiopia, the IJ may take judicial notice of such “commonly

acknowledged facts.” See Rivera-Cruz v. INS, 948 F.2d 962, 966-

67 (5th Cir. 1991). 

Finally, Temesgen argues that his due process rights were

violated when the IJ denied his second request for a continuance

to obtain additional materials regarding the present status of

deportation and segregation of individuals with Eritrean

heritage. A review of the record indicates that the denial of

the second continuance did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 

See Howard v. INS, 930 F.2d 432, 436 (5th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5209]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        GROUP A STREP INFECTIONS

  (Mrs. McCARTHY of New York asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute.)
  Mrs. McCARTHY of New York. Madam Speaker, I rise today to raise 
awareness of group A strep infection. A series of tragic events within 
my district have brought this pressing health situation to my 
attention. One of my constituents, Stephen Sweetman, a dedicated 
fireman, contacted my office after the deaths of his mother and his 2-
year-old son.
  Sean died just days after originally presenting with invasive strep A 
symptoms last February. After flying to New York for Sean's wake, Mr. 
Sweetman's mother died of group A strep infection just 14 days after 
her grandson. Both were originally misdiagnosed with a stomach bug.
  While medical diagnosis presents enormous challenges, especially for 
rare diseases, I am deeply concerned with the medical 
misidentifications which led to these terrible deaths. Recently, 
several of my colleagues and I sent a letter to the Appropriations 
Committee asking that we focus on this issue.
  I hope that we can come together to raise awareness for group A strep 
infections.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4451 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4451

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
Programs Reauthorization Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF HOMELESS VETERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Five-Year Extension of Homeless Veterans Reintegration 
Programs.--Section 2021(e)(1)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``2018'' and inserting ``2022''.
    (b) Five-Year Extension of Homeless Women Veterans and Homeless 
Veterans With Children Reintegration Grant Program.--Section 
2021A(f)(1) of such title is amended by striking ``2018'' and inserting 
``2022''.
    (c) Clarification of Eligibility for Services Under Homeless 
Veterans Reintegration Programs.--Section 2021(a) of such title is 
amended by striking ``reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor 
force.'' and inserting the following: ``reintegration into the labor 
force of--
            ``(1) homeless veterans (including veterans who were 
        homeless but found housing during the 60-day period preceding 
        the date on which the veteran begins to participate in a 
        program under this section);
            ``(2) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs supported housing program for which rental assistance 
        is provided pursuant to section 8(o)(19) of the United States 
        Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19)) or the Tribal HUD-
        VA Supportive Housing (Tribal HUD-VASH) program;
            ``(3) Indians who are veterans and receiving assistance 
        under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self 
        Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.);
            ``(4) veterans described in section 2023(e) of this title 
        or any other veterans who are transitioning from being 
        incarcerated; and
            ``(5) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs rapid rehousing and prevention program authorized in 
        section 2044 of this title.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2010179EN.01003602.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Zeta Europe v OHIM (Superleggera)

(Case T-464/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the figurative Community trade mark Superleggera - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Examination of the facts of its own motion - Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2010/C 179/62)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Zeta Europe BV (Arnhem, Netherlands) (represented by: V. Bilardo, C. Bacchini and M. Mazzitelli, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Sempio and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2008 (Case R 666/2008-1), concerning an application for the registration of the figurative sign Superleggera as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zeta Europe BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zeta Europe BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313 of 6.12.2008

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 66793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27229]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Senior Executive Service: Membership of Performance Review Board

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists approved candidates who will comprise a 
standing roster for service on the Agency's 2012 and 2013 SES 
Performance Review Boards. The Agency will use this roster to select 
SES board members, and an outside member for the convening SES 
Performance Review Board each year. The standing roster is as follows:

Allen, Colleen
Brause, Jon
Cappozola, Christa
Casella, Michael
Cataldo, Ann
Chan, Carol
Crumbly, Angelique
Eugenia, Mercedes
Foley, Jason
Gottlieb, Gregory
Gomer, Lisa
Horton, Jerry
McNerney, Angela
Miranda, Roberto
Moore, Franklin
Kuyumjian, Kent
O'Neill, Maura
Ostermeyer, David
Pascocello, Susan
Peters, James
Romanowski, Alina
Steele, Gloria
Vera, Mauricio
Walther, Mark
Warren, Wade
Wiggins, Sandra
Winter, Gary
Nunez-Mattocks, Aracely; Outside SES Member
Acton, John; Outside SES Member

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Jackson, 202-712-1781.

    Dated: November 1, 2012.
Kevin Kozlowski,
ELR Specialist, Employee & Labor Relations Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-27229 Filed 11-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
19763

#### State v. Okamura

March 25, 1997

Order No. 97-29

Affirmed