alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

I, Ann Crossman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Emergisoft Holding,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement or a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controlsor in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: March 28, 2003 

 

 

/s/    Ann Crossman 

                                                                                                                                               

Ann Crossman 

Controller and Treasurer
410.2-1 

RULE 410.2 Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents - Adopted 4/18/72, Amended 1/9/79, 

Renumbered 5/89 

I. A person shall not during any one day dispose of a total of more than 1 1/2 gallons of any 

photochemically reactive solvent as defined in Rule 410.X., or of any material containing more 

than 1 1/2 gallons of any such photochemically reactive solvent into the atmosphere.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000856141
<NAME> COOL SPRINGS, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          57,166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,750,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,440,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,692,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,246,198
<SALES>                                      1,805,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,630
<CGS>                                        1,407,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,570,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,630
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            197,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   197,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    27.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    27.12
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000908401
<NAME>                        Glyko Biomedical, Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,567,824
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,677,534
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,064,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          411,109
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,963,167
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,309,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,064,524
<SALES>                                        865,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,159,916
<CGS>                                          284,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,203,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,761,569)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,090,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,090,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,090,033)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.17)
        


</TABLE>
Call 1-866-4USDA-WS (1-866-487-3297) or visit aphis.usda.gov/dontfeedwildlife for more information.

CAUTION

Feeding may harm wildlife and is a serious

threat to aviation safety.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. APHIS-22-011-1 | Issued June 2022

ALL FEEDING IS PROHIBITED

Wildlife Services
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William M. Caldwell, IV certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b                 [Not applicable]

 

c)              Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d                 Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: August 15, 2005 |   |   | /s/ William M. Caldwell, IV |
|------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                   |   |   | William M. Caldwell, IV     |
|                   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer     |
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00206

- CR
Remigio A. MARTINEZ III
,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003CR5 033 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Remigio A. Martinez III filed a notice of appeal complaining that the trial court denied his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.

“ Neither the United States nor Texas constitution guarantees the right to appeal state criminal convictions. ” Griffin v. State , 145 S.W.3d 645, 646 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) ; accord Phynes v. State , 828 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) . A defendant may appeal a state criminal conviction only as authorized by statut e. Griffin , 145 S.W.3d at 646; Phynes , 828 S.W.2d at 2. “No statute vests [an appellate court] with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc. ” Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, pet. ref’ d) (mem. op.); accord Reyes v. State , No. 04

- 12

- 00267

- CR, 2012 WL 2602965, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio July 5, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Wilson v. State
, No. 02

- 12

- 00382

- CR, 2013 WL 257278, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Jan. 24, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
T he proper remedy to obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is by petition for writ of mandamus. Ex parte Florence , 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) ; Ex parte Ybarra , 149 S.W.3d 147, 148

– 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)

. W e ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TWENTY

- ONE DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of April, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle Clerk of Court
# C_2009055EN.01001901.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 29 December 2008 — Angelo Rubino v Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca

(Case C-586/08)

(2009/C 55/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Angelo Rubino

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca

Defendant:

Question referred

Is it contrary to the Community principles concerning the abolition of obstacles to the free movement of persons and services between Member States of the Community, and the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications, set out in Articles 3(1)(c) and 47(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, and the provisions contained in Directive 2005/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, for national legislation, such as the Italian rules laid down in Legislative Decree 206/2007, to exclude university lecturers from the scope of the regulated professions for purposes of the recognition of professional qualifications?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 20th day of March, 2009.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    BING
YEH Bing Yeh President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                      ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                 OF
                INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INDUSTRIES, INC.

I, Albert R. Reda, certify that:

1.  The original articles of International Business Industries, Inc.
were filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on  December
8, 1998.

2.  As of this date, there is no issued or outstanding stock.

3.  Pursuant to a Board of Directors meeting at which in excess
of two-thirds  voted in favor of the following amendment, the
company hereby adopts the following amendments to the Articles of
Incorporation of this Corporation:

           Article One: The name of this Corporation is:

               Internet Business's International, Inc.

     Removal of Article Tenth from the Articles of Incorporation

                                 /s/  Albert R. Reda
                                 Albert R. Reda, Secretary/Director

Verification

State of California
                    SS
County of Orange

On this 30th day of June, 1999, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Albert
R. Reda, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person who subscribed his name
to the Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same freely and
voluntarily and for the use and purposes therein mentioned.


By: /s/
Notary Public in and for said
County and State
Order entered August 9, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00850-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.R.E. AND C.E., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-17-0149

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights as 

petitioned for by appellee, the mother of the children. The clerk’s record contains “Defendant’s 

Financial Affidavit” filed on May 2, 2018. In the affidavit, appellant states he is providing the 

information “as part of my application for a court appointed attorney.” The clerk’s record does 

not contain an order appointing an attorney and appellant appeared pro se at trial. Appellant is 

presumed indigent and is entitled to proceed without prepayment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P.

20.1. Appellant is currently incarcerated. In his notice of appeal, appellant states that he cannot 

afford a lawyer.

Texas Family Code section 107.021 provides that, in a suit in which the best interests of a 

child are at issue, other than a suit filed by a governmental entity requesting termination of the 

parent-child relationship or appointment of the entity as conservator of the child, the trial court 

may appoint an attorney ad litem. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.021(a) (West 2014). 
Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing, 

WITHIN TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, and determine whether or not to appoint 

counsel for appellant. The trial court shall make written findings as to whether to appoint 

counsel for appellant and, if counsel is appointed, the contact information for counsel. We 

ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court, WITHIN TWENTY-FIVE DAYS of the date 

of this order, the reporter’s record from the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

the trial court’s written findings of fact and any order appointing counsel.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Brett 

Hall, Presiding Judge of the 382nd Judicial District Court, Lea Carlson, Rockwall County 

District Clerk, Linda Kaiser, Official Court Reporter for the 382nd Judicial District Court, and 

all parties.

We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

will be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the requested supplemental 

records are received, whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2010148EN.01005202.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/52

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Angelidis v Parliament

(Case F-104/08) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Vacant post - Execution of a judgment annulling the appointing decision - Legitimate expectations - Principle of officials’ entitlement to a career - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard to the welfare of officials - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers)

2010/C 148/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Angel Angelidis (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of notice of vacancy No 12564 concerning the filling of the post of Director of the Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the European Union — Directorate D Budgetary Affairs of the European Parliament and the recruitment procedure initiated by that notice. Second, annulment of the decision to reject the applicant’s candidacy for the post of Director of Budgetary Affairs of the Directorate-General for Internal Policies and to appoint another candidate to that post. Lastly, a claim for damages for the non-material and material loss suffered by the applicant and for him to be appointed to the grade of Director ‘ad personam’.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Parliament to pay the sum of EUR 1 000 to Mr Angelidis; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Parliament to pay the sum of EUR 1 000 to Mr Angelidis;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and pay one third of the costs of Mr Angelidis; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and pay one third of the costs of Mr Angelidis;

| 4. | Orders Mr Angelidis to bear two thirds of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mr Angelidis to bear two thirds of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 77.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. SLAUGHTER:
       H.R. 6277.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 3 of Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution.
```