alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael Lesser an Infant, by Jack Lesser His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Margaret Kennedy et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

October 8, 1959.

*Bivin $ Welch*for defendants.

*Fuchsberg .& Fuchsberg*for plaintiffs.

Nicholas M. Pette, J.

Motion by the defendants for an order of preclusion with regard to items “5,” *“*11 ” and “ 13 ” of their demand for a bill of particulars, dated May 21, 1959, or, *813in the alternative, directing plaintiffs to serve a further bill of particulars with regard to said items and striking out a reservation contained in the bill of particulars dated August 28, 1959.

The motion is granted to the extent of directing plaintiffs to serve a further bill of particulars with respect to the items involved. The plaintiffs’ time to contest the items of the demand has long expired and they may not object to such items for the first time when a motion to preclude is made. *(Tomasino*v. *Prudential Westchester Corp.,*1 A D 2d 781.) The fact that some of the information sought is not specifically enumerated in any of the subdivisions of rule 116 of the Rules of Civil Practice does not render the items for such information improper in view of the language of subdivision (j) of said rule. *(Sher*v. *Roth-Schenker Corp.,*72 N. Y. S. 2d 684.)

Insofar as it is sought to strike from the bill of particulars the reservation of the right to prove further and additional damages and all the competent sequelae as are associated with such injuries, the motion is denied except that the plaintiffs will be required to serve a supplemental bill of particulars with respect thereto at least 10 days before the trial. *(Manufacturers & Dealers Motor Underwriters*v. *Fire Brokers’ Assn.,*186 App. Div. 762, 764; *Krstulja*v. *Krstulja,*200 Misc. 186.) The further bill will be served within 10 days of the service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon.

Settle order.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Reese, Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust as of December 31, 2003 (the last date of the period
            covered by the Report).


/s/ Alan Reese
------------------------
Alan Reese,
Chief Accounting Officer

Date: March 18, 2004
# C_2010161EN.01005603.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/56

---

Order of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Unity OSG FZE v Council

(Case T-511/08) (1)

(2010/C 161/90)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.

---
# Opportunity Zones - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Appalachian Community Capital: Investing in the Investors Access to capital is one of the biggest obstacles to small business and entrepreneurial growth in Appalachia. In 2013, with seed money from ARC and other partners, Appalachian Community Capital (ACC) was founded to increase business lending opportunities and new sources of capital via community loan funds and Regional Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). As [&#8230;]The post Appalachian Community Capital: Investing in the Investors appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Lichter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Lichter
-------------------------------------
John Lichter
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004

<PAGE>

       CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien DuFort, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sebastien DuFort
-------------------------------------
Sebastien DuFort
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4445 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4445

To require air carriers to create and make available a concise document 
                    regarding air passenger rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

  Mr. Nolan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require air carriers to create and make available a concise document 
                    regarding air passenger rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    Ths Act may be cited as the ``Airline Consumer Bill of Rights 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PASSENGER RIGHTS.

    (a) Guidelines.--Not later than 3 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall require 
each air carrier to submit for approval a 1-page document that 
accurately describes the rights of passengers in air transportation, 
including guidelines for the following:
            (1) Compensation (regarding rebooking options, refunds, 
        meals, and lodging) for flight delays of various lengths.
            (2) Compensation (regarding rebooking options, refunds, 
        meals, and lodging) for flight cancellation.
            (3) Compensation for mishandling baggage, including 
        delayed, damaged, pilfered, or lost baggage.
            (4) Voluntary relinquishment of a ticketed seat due to 
        overbooking or priority of other passengers.
            (5) Involuntary denial of boarding and forced removal for 
        whatever reason, including for safety and security reasons.
    (b) Approval of Guidelines.--Not later than 3 months after each air 
carrier submits its guidelines for approval to the Secretary under 
subsection (a), the air carrier shall make available such 1-page 
document on its website and in written form at all offices and ticket 
counters.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q/A-1 (the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Leong Hin Chua,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



/s/ Leong Hin Chua
----------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Linesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:August 10, 2010









/s/ James Linesch


James Linesch


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)














A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010288EN.01003501.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-387/08) (1)

(Public service contracts - Publications Office’s tendering procedure - Provision of computing services - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Action for annulment - Award criteria and sub-criteria - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Equal treatment - Transparency - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Claim for damages)

(2010/C 288/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and P. Katsimani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and N. Bambara, Agents, and by J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Re:

Application (i) for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 20 June 2008 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in Call for Tender AO 10185 for computing services — maintenance of the SEI-BUD/AMD/CR systems and related services (OJ 2008/S 43-058884) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and (ii) for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear 90 % of its own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the European Commission, and the latter to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear 90 % of its own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the European Commission, and the latter to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

---
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dresser as of the dates and for periods
presented as required by such Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 13, 2004



/s/    James A. NattierJames A. Nattier Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Constance C. Snow, as Executrix of Howard V. Snow, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

December 8, 1959.

*Carlino <fb Friedman (Myron Friedman*of counsel), for executrix.

*Harry J. Goman*and *Robert L. Collins*for Myrtle Snow.

*Clarence W. Archibold*for State Tax Commission.

John D. Bennett, S.

The court has been requested to sign an order directing Constance Collins Snow to show cause why she should not be punished for contempt.

The alleged contempt is twofold. The first allegation is that she refuses and willfully disobeys a decree of this court with respect to the sale of certain property. The second alleged contempt is that the executrix testified falsely with respect to the amount she received for certain property.

As to the first allegation, there is no decree or order of this court of November 4, 1959 or other date, directing the executrix to sell. There is on the record of this court of November 4, 1959 a stipulation and agreement in which the executrix agreed to make the sale with all reasonable dispatch, which agreement the court approved. That is not sufficient to lay the basis for a contempt proceeding. There must be a decree or order of the court (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 84).

The second basis of contempt is that the executrix is alleged to have testified falsely. Falsity of testimony is not alone suffi*1090cient on which to base a contempt, bnt such false testimony must be given with an obstructive, evasive or contumacious intent. No such intent is shown in the papers submitted.

The court declines and refuses to sign the order to show cause for the reasons stated above. The facts presented in this application may well be the basis of a proceeding to remove the executrix or revoke her letters under section 99 of the Surrogate’s Court Act *(Haight*v. *Brisbin,*100 N. Y. 219). However, a contempt proceeding will not lie.

No order need be submitted on this decision unless the applicant so desires.
# C_2011046EN.01000901.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Fidelio v OHIM (Hallux)

(Case T-286/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Hallux - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 46/13

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fidelio KG (Linz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 632/2007-4) relating to registration of the word sign ‘Hallux’as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fidelio KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fidelio KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION   EXTRACTED   FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED
                              BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1996 AND THE
                              CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR THE  YEAR
                              ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
                              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              11,350
<SECURITIES>                                        29,733
<RECEIVABLES>                                       23,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,700
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                             868,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                     172,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     988,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            457,956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               406
<OTHER-SE>                                         494,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       988,776
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   121,166
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     68,539
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 68,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        68,539
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                                  


</TABLE>
# Casey - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. Executive Director Waylon Wright Email &#119;&#x61;y&#108;&#x6f;n&#64;&#x6c;c&#97;&#x64;d&#46;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Robert J. Parry, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





/s/  Robert
                J. ParryRobert
                J. Parry*(Principal
                Executive Officer)*





November
      12, 2008