alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.7


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY






             KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned officer and/or
     director of ANTEC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
     which is about to file an annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended on Form 10-K, hereby 
     constitutes and appoints Lawrence A. Margolis, Daniel J. Distel and James
     E. Knox, each of them his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
     agents, with full power and all capacities, to sign the Corporation's Form
     10-K and any and all amendments thereto, and any other documents in      
     connection therewith, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange 
     Commision, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and 
     authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and 
     necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents 
     and purposes as she or he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying 
     and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their 
     substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue 
     hereof.




             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his or her
     hand and seal as of the 15th day of March, 1997.



                                
                                                 /s/ John M. Egan
                                                 ------------------------------
LOGO



Exhibit 13(a)



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: June 4, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ John Marlay                                   
|                    |  |  |  | Name: John Marlay Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Glenn
Welstad, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Command Center, Inc. (the
“Company”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March
27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:    
August 10, 2009





/s/
      Glenn Welstad


Glenn
Welstad


President
and Chief Executive Officer





10-Q


Page
22
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Dynamic Oil & Gas, Inc. - Exhibit 4(xi)






AMENDED SCHEDULE “A” 


Amended as of the 30th day of September, 2004. 


Employee 

	 Salary:  	 $108,472 per annum 
      

	 	 
	 Holidays:  	 Five weeks per annum 
      

	 	 
	 Entities:  	 None  

	 	 
	 Other Benefits:  	 Medical, dental, AD&D and
        life insurance coverage provided to all senior management. 
      

	  	  
	  	 Dynamic shall also contribute
        $13,500 per annum to the Employee’s Registered Retirement
        Savings Plan.  






DYNAMIC OIL & GAS, INC. 

 Per: 

	  	
      /s/ Wayne Babcock  	 	  
	  	Authorized Signatory 	 	  
	 	 	 	 
	  	
      /s/ Donald Umbach  	 	
      /s/ Michael Bardell  
	  	Authorized Signatory  	 	 Michael Bardell (Employee)
#### 154 Realty Corp., Landlord, *v.*Yetta Fischer, Tenant.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan,

April 30, 1959.

*David A. Steinboek*for landlord.

*Kotsen, Mann & Handsman {Philip L. Handsman*of counsel), for tenant.

Xavier C. Riccobono, J.

The landlord brings this proceeding to dispossess the tenant pursuant to section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) and section 12 of the Business Rent Law of the State of New York (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) on the grounds that it has complied with said sections in that, on June 25, 1956 it had offered to enter into a lease with the tenant for possession of store premises herein at a rental in the same amount as the emergency rent with respect to the store premises occupied by the tenant.

It is undisputed that the parties did enter into a lease for a term commencing July 1, 1956 and ending June 30, 1958, at a rental in the same amount as the emergency rent.

*990On February 18,1959, the landlord gave notice to vacate and surrender the premises pursuant to said section providing for decontrol of the premises.

The questions involved in this proceeding are:

1) Whether the proffered lease was on substantially similar terms and conditions as existed with respect to such tenancy, and if not;

2) Whether the tenant waived any of the provisions of the act by virtue of her having executed the said lease and holding thereunder.

The tenant has occupied the premises for some 21 years and up until she executed the lease in question occupied same as a monthly tenant under an oral letting.

Section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) provides that a landlord must offer to make a lease:

1) “ for a term to commence on the first day of the month next succeeding the twentieth day after the mailing of such offer as hereinafter provided and to expire on June thirtieth, nineteen hundred fifty-eight ”.

2) “ at a rental in the same amount as the emergency rent ”.

3) *“*and otherwise on substantially similar terms and conditions as existing with respect to such tenancy”.

Here, the offer to make a lease was mailed on June 25, 1956. The term offered should have been from the first day of the month next succeeding the 20th day thereafter. July 15, 1956 being the expiration date of said offer, the lease should have commenced on August 1,1956. Instead, the lease commenced on July 1, 1956.

The lease offered, a real estate board, standard form of store lease, was obviously not “ on substantially similar terms and conditions as existing with respect to such tenancy.”

The court is of the view that since the relief sought herein is statutory, the statute must be strictly complied with. Nor may the landlord contend that the tenant has waived the provisions of the act, since section 12 of the Business Bent Law specifically provides *“*Any waiver of any of the provisions of this act shall be unenforceable and void ’ ’.

The court finds, therefore, that the landlord has failed to comply with section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) and that the tenant has not waived any provisions thereof and accordingly grants final order for tenant dismissing the petition.-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7489
NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusTHOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; KATHLEEN LANDERKIN, Lieutenant, Administrative Remedy Coordinator; BARBARA BROWN, Finance Superv isor; MICHAEL MILLER, Classification Case Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 3864-L) Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and HALL, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Phelps Ken nedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Corcoran , No. CA-96-3864-L (D. Md. Oct. 7, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
01/2022

Requesting Approval to Store Regulated Garbage More than 120 

Hours

Any entity wishing to store regulated garbage for more than 120 hours must 

first receive approval from the APHIS Administrator. Send a signed letter 

requesting approval to the APHIS Administrator at the following address:

Administrator

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

c/o AQI VMO Director

USDA-APHIS-PPQ 

Field Operations 

2150 Centre Ave Bldg B

Fort Collins, CO 80526

Alternatively, a signed letter requesting approval to store regulated garbage 

longer than 120 hours may be sent to the APHIS Administrator by email at the 

following address:

ppq.ops.regulated.garbage@aphis.usda.gov

Include the following information in the request:

1. Name and address of company currently under compliance agreement to 

handle regulated garbage.

2. Length of time that the company above is currently storing regulated 

garbage.

3. Length of time that the company above is requesting to store regulated

4. garbage.

5. Justification to support the company’s request to store regulated garbage 

for longer than 120 hours. Please attach supporting documentation (i.e., 

schedule of the hauling/cartage firm’s pick up dates, times and hours of 

operation; proof that the hauling/cartage firm currently used by the 

company is the only approved hauling/cartage firm available to haul the 

regulated garbage).

6. A detailed and accurate description of the type of equipment to be used in 

the storage of regulated garbage.

7. A copy of your existing compliance agreement.
Requesting Approval to Store Regulated Garbage More than 120 Hours

2 USDA APHIS Recycling Material Exemption 01/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GARY LEE GERBER JR.,

Petitioner

PETITION OF: AMANDA L. GERBER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 105 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Motion GRANTED in part and Order filed July 1 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00274

- CV

____________ IN RE DONOVAN MITTLESTED , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS C ounty C ourt at Law N o. 3 Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR39333



### ORDER

On April 18, 2022 , relator Donovan Mittlested filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Jeremy E. Warren, presiding judge of County Court at Law No. 3 in Brazoria County , Texas, to set aside his March 17, 2022 order of contempt, entered in trial court number
PR39333 , styled In the Estate of Jack McClure, Deceased

. Relator has also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedin gs below. See
Tex. R. App. P

. 52.8(b), 52.10. On May 24, 2022, relator ask ed this court to stayproceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of

mandamus.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relat or’s request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion in part and issue the following order:

We ORDER the March 17, 2022 order of contempt in trial court cause
number PR39333 , In the Estate of Jack McClure, Deceased
, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further
order of this court. All other relief requested in the motion i s denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements and in the related prospectuses of our report dated
January 25, 2002 on the consolidated balance sheets of Sky Financial Group, Inc.
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2001; which report is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Form S-8 No. 333-65942
Form S-8 No. 333-59312
Form S-8 No. 333-67233
Form S-8 No. 333-47315 (Post-Effective Amendment No.1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4)
Form S-8 No. 333-60741 (Post Effective Amendment No.1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4)
Form S-3 No. 333-64127 (Filed as Citizens Bancshares, Inc.)
Form S-8 No. 333-18867 (Filed as Citizens Bancshares, Inc.)


                                               /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                               Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 27, 2002
# C_2021289EN.01000801.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rīgas apgabaltiesas Civillietu tiesas kolēģija — Latvia) — ‘CV-Online Latvia’ SIA v ‘Melons’ SIA

(Case C-762/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Legal protection of databases - Directive 96/9/EC - Article 7 - Sui generis right of makers of databases - Prohibition on any third party to ‘extract’ or ‘re-utilise’, without the maker’s permission, the whole or a substantial part of the contents of the database - Database freely accessible on the internet - Meta search engine specialising in job advertisement searches - Extraction and/or re-utilisation of the contents of a database - Risk to the substantial investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of the content of a database)

(2021/C 289/10)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Rīgas apgabaltiesas Civillietu tiesas kolēģija

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘CV-Online Latvia’ SIA

Defendant:‘Melons’ SIA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) and (2) of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases must be interpreted as meaning that an internet search engine specialising in searching the contents of databases, which copies and indexes the whole or a substantial part of a database freely accessible on the internet and then allows its users to search that database on its own website according to criteria relevant to its content, is ‘extracting’ and ‘re-utilising’ that content within the meaning of that provision, which may be prohibited by the maker of such a database where those acts adversely affect its investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of that content, namely that they constitute a risk to the possibility of redeeming that investment through the normal operation of the database in question, which it is for the referring court to verify.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.

---
Exhibit 10(h)(iii)

                                 PROMISORY NOTE
                                 --------------


Principal:    $500,000                        Date:    March 11, 2005
----------                                    -----
Interest:     Prevailing Prime Rate           Place:   Vega Alta, PR
---------                                     ------


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,  Margo Caribe,  Inc.,(the "maker") a Puerto
Rico Corporation,  at Road 690, KM 5.8, Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692, acting and
represented by its Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer,  Luis R.
Carrasquillo,  single and  resident of Caguas,  Puerto  Rico,  who has been duly
authorized to appear  herein by  Resolution  of the Board of  Directors,  hereby
promises to pay to Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector,  (the "holders"),
both of legal age,  married to each other and  resident of Dorado,  Puerto Rico,
the exact principal sum of Five Hundred Thousands Dollars($500,000) lawful money
of the United States of America,

The note shall be payable not later than  January 31,  2006.  Interest  shall be
based on the prevailing prime rate (Citibank N.Y. Prime Rate). Interest shall be
paid monthly.

This  note may be  repaid  in whole or in part at any time  without  premium  or
penalty.

This note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico without regard to principles of conflict of laws.



MAKER:


MARGO CARIBE, INC.


By: /s/ Luis R. Carrasquillo Ruiz
    ------------------------------
       Luis R. Carrasquillo Ruiz
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  quarter  ended  June 30, 2006 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.

This 7th day of August, 2006.

/s/ R. Daniel Blanton
-----------------------------
R. Daniel Blanton
President &
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)

 /s/ Darrell R. Rains
-----------------------------
Darrell R. Rains
Group Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer)
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Hana
Biosciences, Inc. does hereby certify that to the best of his
knowledge:





(a) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hana Biosciences, Inc. for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Hana Biosciences,
Inc.





Dated:
      May 15, 2009
              /s/ Steven R. Deitcher,
  MDSteven
      R. Deitcher, MDPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      May 15, 2009
              /s/ John P. IparraguirreJohn
      P. IparraguirreVice
      President, Chief Financial
Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wylie Corbin, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered July 14, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea at any time prior to sentencing, his challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Mackey,*77 NY2d 846; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Gonzalez,*150 AD2d 796; *People v Berrios,*144 AD2d 566). Moreover: "Even if the defendant’s allocution did not establish the essential elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty, it would not require vacatur of his plea since there is no suggestion in the record that the plea was improvident or baseless *(see, People v Nixon,*21 NY2d 338, 350, *cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York,*393 US 1067; *People v Pelaccio,*141 AD2d 772; *People v Phelps,*140 AD2d 637)” *(People v Duff,*158 AD2d 711; *see, People v Cruz,*146 AD2d 708; *People v Perkins,*89 AD2d 956).

Furthermore, having knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty with the assistance of capable counsel, the defendant may not now argue that the testimony given at the prior suppression hearing indicated that the evidence available to the People for use at a trial was legally insufficient to support the crime of robbery in the second degree *(see, People v Torres,*171 AD2d 825).

Finally, insofar as the sentence that was imposed was the sentence that the defendant bargained for and agreed to as part of the negotiated plea, he may not now complain that it was harsh or excessive *(see, People v DiSalvo,*170 AD2d 617; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Nor are there any factors present in this case which would warrant modification of the sentence by this court. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 187TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Raymond Zapata, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-15-00385-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CR6346

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 28, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 14

- 00868

- CR

Vanessa Z. SALAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9364B

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 1, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal

. The motion is granted, and this appeal is

dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH