alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011013EN.01003602.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/36

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Cerafogli v European Central Bank

(Case F-84/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - ECB Staff - Action for damages seeking compensation for harm resulting directly from alleged illegality of conditions of employment and staff rules - Civil Service Tribunal’s lack of jurisdiction - Inadmissible - Release from service for staff representation - No adjustment of workload - Wrongful act)

2011/C 13/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Maria Concetta Cerafogli (Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Malfrère and N. Urban, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for an order requiring the ECB to pay compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of discrimination connected with her trade union activities.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Central Bank to pay Ms Cerafogli the sum of EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Central Bank to pay Ms Cerafogli the sum of EUR 5 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application: |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application:

| 3. | Orders the European Central Bank to bear its own costs and to pay one third of Ms Cerafogli’s costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Central Bank to bear its own costs and to pay one third of Ms Cerafogli’s costs;

| 4. | Orders Ms Cerafogli to bear two thirds of her costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ms Cerafogli to bear two thirds of her costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 327 of 20.12.2008, p. 43.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements andmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Landry’s Restaurants, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Landry’s Restaurants, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-75886 relating to the Company’s shelf registration statement) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113438relating to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, 333-104175 relating to the Company’s 2002 Employee/Rainforest Conversion Plan and the Company’s 2002 and 2001 Employee Agreements, 333-93173 relating to the Company’s Amendedand Restated 1995 Flexible Incentive Plan, 333-02862 relating to the Company’s Stock Option Plan, 333-02854 relating to the Company’s 1995 Flexible Spending Plan, 333-81007 relating to the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan, and333-76500 relating to the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors). 

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

March 9, 2006
### ZUCKER T SCOUTT &

• RASENBERGER , L.L

E ATTORNEV S A T LA W^.^•^:''i.z U 88 8 SeventeenthStreet , NV Y Washington , D

C 20006-5^0 9 Telephon e [202] 298-866 0 Fa x [202 ] 542-068 3 wwwzsrlawco m

Marc h24 , 20 1 • ) •- ! 

### U : 0 3

B Y HAN D DELIVER Y Georg e Wellingto n Chief , Foreig n Ai r

Carrie r Licensin g Divisio n X-4 5 Offic e o f Internationa l Aviatio n Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0

Re : Porte r

Airline s Inc . (Docke t

DOT-OST-2007-27402 ) Dea r Mr . Wellington : O n Marc h23 , 2011 , Porte r Airline s Inc . ("Porter" ) filed alette r i n th e above-reference d docke t i n whic hi t state dtha t

Community Ai r

Impac t Revitj w (CAIR ) apparentl y resubmitte dt o th e docke t

acop y o f

comment s previousl y submitte do n Octobe r 20 , 2009 . After

discussion s withDepartmen t

staff . Porte r understand s tha t

CAlR' s Octobe r

20 , 200 9 comment s wer e actuall y onl y formall y dockete dfor th e first tim e o n Marc h18 , 2011 , givin g th e appearance o f a duplicat e submission . Porte r wishe s t o clarif

y thi s matte r

fo r th e recor di n this docket . Porte r urge s th e Departmen t

t o promptl y issu e it s foreig n ai r carrie r permi t a s more full

y discusse di

n it s Motion . Sincerely ,

JohnH . Gillic k Davi dM . Endersbe e Counse l for

Porte r Airline s Inc . cc : Servic e Lis tCERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s 24thda

y o f Marc h2011 . acop y o f

th e foregoin g wa s serve d b y emai l o n th e partie s name dbelow : R . Bruc e Keiner , Jr . Lorrain e B . Hallowa y Counse l for

Continenta l Airline s Crowel l & Morin g 100 1 Pennsylvani aAvenue , N.W . Washington , D.C . 2000 4 rbkeiner@crowell.co m Lhaiioway@crowelI.co m Hershe l Kame n Vic e President—Internationa l an dRegulatory Affair s Da n Weis s Continenta l Airlines , Inc . Governmen t

Affairs—8**^ Floo r 160 0 Smit hStree t Dept . HQSG V Houston , T X 7700 2 hkamen@coair,co m dan.weiss(a),coair.co m Pau l Arvanitidi s Counsello r

(Transportation ) Canadia n Embass y 50 1 Pennsylvani aAvenue . N W Washington , D C 2000 1 paul.arvanitidis@inteniational.gc.c a Krishn a''Kris " Ur s Deputy Assistan t

Secretary fo

r Transportatio n Affair s U.S . Departmen t

o f State 220 1 C Street , N.W. , Roo m583 0 Washington , D.C . 2052 0 urskr@state.go v

WilliamFreeman Chai r Community AI R P.O . Bo x 8105 7 57 B Harbou r

Squar e Toronto , Ontario , Canad a M5 J 2R 0 billfreeman@rogers.co m info@communityair.or g

Davi dM . Endersbe e
# Adams - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission Executive Director John Hemmings Email &#106;h&#101;m&#109;i&#x6e;g&#x73;&#64;&#x6f;v&#x72;d&#x63;&#46;&#x6f;r&#x67;The post Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2009069EN.01003102.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Portugal

(Case C-24/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 69/62)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
# C_2010011EN.01000901.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/9

---

Order of the Court of 23 September 2009 — Complejo Agrícola, SA v Commission of the European Communities, Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-415/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Protection of habitats - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Commission Decision - Action for annulment brought by natural or legal persons - Admissibility - Appeal clearly unfounded)

2010/C 11/14

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Complejo Agrícola, SA (represented by: A. Menéndez Menéndez and G. Yanguas Montero, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Recchia and A. Alcover San Pedro, agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 14 July 2008 in Case T-345/06 Complejo Agrícola v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the application for partial annulment of Article 1 of Annex 1 of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Acebuchales de la Campiña sur de Cádiz’, which includes a farm belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region

Complejo Agrícola

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Complejo Agrícola S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Complejo Agrícola S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313 of 06.12.2008

1

---
ORDER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

(First Chamber)

4 June 2009

Case F-56/08

**Jorge de Britto Patricio-Dias**

**v**

**Commission of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme – Primary cover for dependent children by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme – Lack of complaint – Manifest inadmissibility)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr de Britto Patricio-Dias contests the Commission’s decision refusing
his dependent children primary cover under the European Community institutions’ Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme.

**Held:**The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

**Summary**

1.      *Action for annulment – Actionable measures – Definition – Measures capable of affecting a given legal position – Action brought
solely against the statement of reasons for a measure – Inadmissibility*

*(Art. 230 EC)*

2.      *Officials – Actions – Prior administrative complaint – None – Inadmissibility*

*(Staff Regulations, Arts 90 and 91)*

1.      Only measures which give rise to binding legal effects capable of directly and immediately affecting the applicant’s interests
by significantly altering his legal position constitute acts or decisions the annulment of which may be sought. An action
for annulment is not available, on the other hand, against the grounds for such acts, since they do not constitute the necessary
support for the operative part of an act adversely affecting a person’s interests.

(see para. 15)

See:

T-138/89 *NBV and NVB* v *Commission* [1992] ECR II‐2181, para. 31

2.      Under Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations, appeals against an act adversely affecting an official lie only if the appointing
authority has previously had a complaint submitted to it pursuant to Article 90(2) within the required time limit, and if
that complaint has been rejected expressly or by implication.

(see para. 16)

See:

T-108/99 *Reggimenti* v *Parliament* [1999] ECR-SC I‐A‐243 and II‐1205, para. 19
# Alcorn - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northeast Mississippi Planning and Development District Executive Director Sharon Gardner Email &#115;&#x67;a&#114;&#x64;n&#101;&#x72;&#64;&#x6e;&#x65;&#109;&#x70;d&#100;&#x2e;c&#111;&#x6d;The post Northeast Mississippi Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAGALY GUADALUPE MORALES

CALDERON,

Petitioner,

v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 71223

Agency No. A209

- 285

- 746

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 1 8 , 2019 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Magaly Guadalupe Morales

- Calderon, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her motion to

reconsider the denial of her mo tion to reopen proceedings conducted in absentia.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 71223

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of motions to reopen or reconsider
, and review de novo

questions of law. Toor v. Lynch , 789 F.3d 1055, 1059 ( 9th Cir. 2015) . We deny in

part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Morales

- Calderon’s

motion to reconsider, where she did not identify any errors of law or fact in the IJ’s

denial of her motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(2) ( “ A motion to

reconsider shall state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors of fact or

law in the [IJ] ’ s prior decision and shall be supported by pertinent authority.” ).

To the extent the IJ erred in not considering the evidence Morales

- Calderon

attached to her motion to reconsid er, any error was rendered harmless by the BIA

also construing the motion to reconsider as a second motion to reopen based on

newly submitted evidence

. See Singh v. Holder
, 591 F.3d 1190, 1199 (9th Cir.

2010) ( any error by the IJ w as rendered harmless by the BIA’ s de novo review of

the issue)

. Morales

- Calderon has not raised, and therefore waives, any challenge

to the BIA’s denial of the motion, construed as a second motion to reopen
, as

number

- barred. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 10 72, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir.

2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived)

. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of sua sponte reopening,

where Morales

- Calderon has not raised a claim of legal or constitutional err or3 18

- 71223

underlying the agency’s decision. See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th

Cir. 2016).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5749]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      REMEMBERING THE 9/11 ATTACKS

  (Mr. FITZPATRICK asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. FITZPATRICK. Mr. Speaker, tomorrow our Nation will mark the 11th 
anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. At 
community gatherings across the country, neighbors will come together 
to honor the memory of those lost in New York, Pennsylvania, and our 
Nation's capital, including a ceremony in Bucks County at the 9/11 
Garden of Reflection, the official Pennsylvania memorial to the victims 
of the September 11 attacks.
  As I stand before you this evening, I'm reminded of the President's 
address to the Nation the evening of the attacks. In his remarks to the 
Nation, the President said that:

       Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest 
     buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. 
     These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of 
     American resolve.

  Eleven years later, our resolve has never been stronger, and we 
continue to honor the memory of those tragically lost that day.

                          ____________________
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer of Email Real Estate.com,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
August 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 4, 2002

/s/ Dan O'Meara,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Financial Officer of Email Real Estate.com,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
August 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 4, 2002

 /s/ Dan O'Meara
Dan O'Meara, President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2013123EN.01001502.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2013 — Dole Food and Dole Germany v Commission

(Case T-588/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in bananas - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Concept of a concerted practice having an anti-competitive object - Information exchange system - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Rights of the defence - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity of the infringement)

2013/C 123/25

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Dole Food Company, Inc. (Westlake Village, California, United States); and Dole Germany OHG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by X. Lewis and M. Kellerbauer, and subsequently by M. Kellerbauer and P. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 5955 final of 15 October 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC (Case COMP/39.188 — Bananas)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Germany OHG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Germany OHG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
# C_2022109EN.01000401.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Benedetti Pietro e Angelo Ss and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA)

(Case C-377/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Milk and milk products sector - Quotas - Additional levy - Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 - Deliveries exceeding the producer’s available reference quantity - Collection of the contribution to the excess levy by the purchaser - Refund of levies overpaid - Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 - Article 16 - Criteria for redistributing the excess levy)

(2022/C 109/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Benedetti Pietro e Angelo Ss, Capparotto Giampaolo e Lorenzino Ss, Gonzo Dino Ss, Mantovani Giuseppe e Giorgio Ss, Azienda agricola Padovani Luigi, Azienda agricola La Pila di Mastrotto Piergiorgio e C. Ss, Azienda agricola Mastrotto Giuseppe, Soc. agr. semplice F.lli Isolan

Respondent: Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 16(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 of 30 March 2004 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which has the effect that reimbursement of the excess amount of the additional levy must, as a matter of priority, benefit producers in respect of whom purchasers have fulfilled their obligation to pay that levy on a monthly basis.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.

---
EX-10.16






Exhibit 10.16





March 25, 2005



Mr. Michael E. Maroone


President & Chief Operating Officer


AutoNation, Inc.


110 S.E. 6th Street


Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301



	 	 	 
	RE:

	 	Amendment No. 1 to that Certain Employment

Agreement dated as of May 14, 2003







Dear Mike:



Reference is hereby made to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2003 (the
“Employment Agreement”), between AutoNation, Inc. (the “Company”) and you. By means of this letter
agreement, the Company wishes to confirm your agreement to amend the Employment Agreement by
replacing clause (iii) of Paragraph 1(e) thereof in its entirety with the
following:



“(iii) use of the Company’s corporate aircraft for personal travel
for up to 70 hours per year (provided that the value of
such travel will be included in the Executive’s annual income
subject to tax in accordance with the applicable regulations of
the Internal Revenue Service and Company policy)”



Please confirm your agreement to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth above by signing
this letter agreement as indicated below.




AUTONATION, INC.




 /s/ Michael J. Jackson




	 	 	 	Michael J. Jackson

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer





Agreed and Confirmed:



/s/ Michael E. Maroone


Michael E. Maroone
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4452 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to repeal a small business 

loan data collection requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2017 

Mr. PITTENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to repeal a 

small business loan data collection requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Lend Act 

5 of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION RE7 QUIREMENT. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—Section 704B of the Equal Credit Op9 portunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691c–2) is repealed. 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4452 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 701(b) of 

2 the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691(b)) is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the 

5 end; 

6 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in7 serting a period; and 

8 (3) by striking paragraph (5). 

9 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

10 for title VII of the Consumer Credit Protection Act is 

11 amended by striking the item relating to section 704B. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS