alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Cheever, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prism Software
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

           c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.


Date:  March 31, 2006                                /S/ MICHAEL CHEEVER
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Michael Cheever, Treasurer
# C_2020390EN.01001101.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil — Slovenia) — Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve

(Case C-367/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public service contracts - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 2(1)(5) - Concept of ‘public contract’ - Concept of ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ - Tenderer’s bid at a price of EUR 0.00 - Rejection of the tender - Article 69 - Abnormally low tender)

(2020/C 390/14)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o.

Defendant: Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve

Intervener: LEXPERA d.o.o.,

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(5) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2365 of 18 December 2017, must be interpreted as not constituting a legal basis for rejecting a tenderer’s bid in a public procurement procedure on the sole ground that the price proposed in the tender is EUR 0.00.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
# C_2010134EN.01000301.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni, trekking.at Reisen GmbH

(Case C-278/08) (1)

1

(Trade marks - Internet - Keyword advertising - Display, on the basis of keywords which are identical with or similar to trade marks, of links to sites of competitors of the proprietors of those trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1))

2010/C 134/03

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH

Applicant:

Defendants: Günter Guni, trekking.at Reisen GmbH

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 5(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) — Reservation of a sign similar or identical to a trade mark with an internet search engine operator in order that, once that sign has been entered as a search term, advertising for products or services identical or similar to those for which the trade mark in question was registered appears automatically on the screen (‘keyword advertising’) — Classification of that utilisation of the trade mark as a use which its proprietor is entitled to prevent

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical with or similar to that trade mark which that advertiser has, without the consent of that proprietor, selected in connection with an internet referencing service, goods or services identical with those for which that mark is registered, in the case where that advertising does not enable an average internet user, or enables that user only with difficulty, to ascertain whether the goods or services referred to therein originate from the proprietor of the trade mark or by an undertaking which is economically connected to it or, on the contrary, originate from a third party.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.08.2008

1

---
# C_2010288EN.01002701.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/27

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-200/08) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/46)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 5.7.2008.

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4412 

To amend the Military Selective Service Act to provide that a registrant 

for selective service may indicate at the time of registration a desire 

to be classified as a conscientious objector. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Ms. MOORE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Military Selective Service Act to provide that 

a registrant for selective service may indicate at the 

time of registration a desire to be classified as a conscientious objector. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF REGISTRANT FOR SELECTIVE 

4 SERVICE TO INDICATE AT THE TIME OF REG5 ISTRATION A DESIRE TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A 

6 CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR. 

7 (a) AUTHORITY AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT.— 

8 Section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4412 IH

1 3802) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

2 subsection: 

3 ‘‘(c)(1) Regulations prescribed pursuant to sub4 section (a) shall authorize a person registering under this 

5 section to indicate at the time of registration that the per6 son desires to be classified— 

7 ‘‘(A) as being conscientiously opposed (by rea8 son of religious, ethical, or moral belief) to participa9 tion in combatant military training and service in 

10 the Armed Forces; or 

11 ‘‘(B) as being conscientiously opposed (by rea12 son of religious, ethical, or moral belief) to participa13 tion in war in any form and to participation in both 

14 noncombatant and combatant military training and 

15 service in the Armed Forces. 

16 ‘‘(2) Notice shall be provided on registration forms 

17 that the indication by a registrant under paragraph (1) 

18 of a desire to be classified in a manner described in such 

19 paragraph— 

20 ‘‘(A) is not binding on the United States; and 

21 ‘‘(B) does not assure that the registrant will be 

22 so classified pursuant to section 6(j). 

23 ‘‘(3) The Director of Selective Service may allow a 

24 registrant under paragraph (1) who indicates a desire to 

25 be classified in a manner described in such paragraph to 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4412 IH

1 submit a written statement in support of such classifica2 tion. The written statement shall be in any format that 

3 the Director determines appropriate. The Director shall 

4 take steps to ensure that— 

5 ‘‘(A) any such statement is included in the reg6 istrant’s record; and 

7 ‘‘(B) the receipt of such a statement is noted 

8 on any record of registration provided to the reg9 istrant.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION OF AMEND11 MENT.—Subsection (c) of section 3 of the Military Selec12 tive Service Act (50 U.S.C. 3802), as added by subsection 

13 (a), shall apply to registrations under such section occur14 ring after the end of the one-year period beginning on the 

15 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21

NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

At December 31, 2008



|                                    |  |                       |  |                       |  
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------- | -
|NAME OF CORPORATION                 |  | STATE OFINCORPORATION |  | PERCENTAGEOFOWNERSHIP |  
|The National Bank and Trust Company |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                   | %
|NB&T Insurance Agency Group, Inc.   |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                   | %
|NB&T Insurance Agency, Inc.         |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                   | %
|NB&T Statutory Trust III            |  | Delaware              |  | 100                   | %



95
# C_2020287EN.01002301.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/23

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Airbnb Ireland UC, Airbnb Payments UK Ltd v Agenzia delle Entrate

(Case C-723/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Letting of immovable property for periods of less than thirty days - Online property rental platform - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 287/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Airbnb Ireland UC, Airbnb Payments UK Ltd

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Other parties to the proceedings: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Federazione delle Associazioni Italiane Alberghi e Turismo (Federalberghi), Renting Services Group s.r.l.s., Coordinamento delle Associazioni e dei Comitati di Tutela dell’Ambiente e dei Diritti degli Utenti e dei Consumatori (Codacons)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), made by decision of 11 July 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugenio Colon, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying his request to charge the jury on the law of entrapment. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant, we find that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that defendant was improperly induced to engage in any criminal act for which he lacked a predisposition *(see, People v Butts,*72 NY2d 746; *People v Alwadish,*67 NY2d 973, 974; *People v Thompson,*47 NY2d 940, 941; *People v Pilgrim,*154 AD2d 407, *lv denied 75*NY2d 816; *People v Beverly,*148 AD2d 922, *lv denied 74*NY2d 661).

We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONALD CARL ENYEART,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 319 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# C_2021035EN.01001001.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem — Netherlands) — R.N.N.S. (C-225/19), K.A. (C-226/19) v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

(Joined Cases C-225/19 and C-226/19) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Community Code on Visas - Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 - Article 32(1) to (3) - Decision to refuse a visa - Annex VI - Standard form - Statement of reasons - Threat to public policy, internal security or public health, or to the international relations of any of the Member States - Article 22 - Procedure of prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States - Objection to the issuing of a visa - Appeal against a decision to refuse a visa - Scope of judicial review - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective remedy)

(2021/C 35/11)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: R.N.N.S. (C-225/19), K.A. (C-226/19)

Defendant: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Operative part of the judgment

Article 32(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning, first, that a Member State which has adopted a final decision refusing to issue a visa on the basis of Article 32(1)(a)(vi) of Regulation No 810/2009, as amended by Regulation No 610/2013, because another Member State objected to the issuing of that visa is required to indicate, in that decision, the identity of the Member State which raised that objection, the specific ground for refusal based on that objection, accompanied, where appropriate, by the essence of the reasons for that objection, and the authority which the visa applicant may contact in order to ascertain the remedies available in that other Member State and, secondly, that, where an appeal is lodged against that decision on the basis of Article 32(3) of Regulation No 810/2009, as amended by Regulation No 610/2013, the courts of the Member State which adopted that decision cannot examine the substantive legality of the objection raised by another Member State to the issuing of the visa.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5940-S5941]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          STOCK ACT AMENDMENTS

  Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
proceed to the immediate consideration of S. 3510, introduced earlier 
today
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (S. 3510) to prevent harm to the national security 
     or endangering the military officers and civilian employees 
     to whom internet publication of certain information applies, 
     and for other purposes.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
  Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be 
read a third time and passed, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the 
table, and that any statements relating to the bill be printed in the 
Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The bill (S. 3510) was ordered to a third reading, read the third 
time, and passed, as follows:

                                S. 3510

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE DELAY.

       The STOCK Act (Public Law 112-105) is amended--
       (1) in section 8(a)(1), by striking ``August 31, 2012'' and 
     inserting ``September 30, 2012''; and
       (2) in section 11(a)(1), by striking ``August 31, 2012'' 
     and inserting ``September 30, 2012''.

     SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF PTR REQUIREMENTS UNDER STOCK ACT.

       Effective September 30, 2012, for purposes of implementing 
     subsection (l) of section 103 of the Ethics in Government Act 
     of 1978 (as added by section 6 of the STOCK Act, Public Law 
     112-105) for reporting individuals whose reports under 
     section 101 of such Act (5 U.S.C. App. 101) are required to 
     be filed with the Clerk of the House of Representatives, 
     section 102(e) of such Act (5 U.S.C. App. 102(e)) shall apply 
     as if the report under such subsection (l) were a report 
     under such section 101 but only with respect to the 
     transaction information required under such subsection (l).

  Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for up to 
10 minutes as in morning business.

[[Page S5941]]

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 7, 2010/s/ William M. Caldwell, IV


William M. Caldwell, IV, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

March 17, 2015

Mary B. Hennessy

LAW OFFICE OF MARY HENNESSY

P. O. Box 2536 Brenham, TX 77834

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Douglas Howell, III

Assistant District Attorney

300 East 26th Street, Suite 310 Bryan, TX 77803

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Numbers: 07-13-00353-CR, 07-14-00423-CR, 07-14-00424-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 11-02991-CRF-361 Style: Terry Fielder v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.1, the above styled and numbered causes will be

submitted without oral argument on Tuesday, April 7, 2015.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
# City of Radford - Appalachian Regional Commission

- New River Valley Planning District Commission Executive Director Kevin Byrd Email &#x6e;&#114;v&#x70;&#100;c&#x40;&#110;r&#x76;&#112;d&#x63;&#46;o&#x72;&#103;The post New River Valley Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,176,618
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,820,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,057,063
<INVENTORY>                                     40,304,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,816,600
<PP&E>                                          13,252,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,776,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,347,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,457,551
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        72,801,583
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,511,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,347,440
<SALES>                                         43,678,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,678,535
<CGS>                                           22,234,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,105,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   330,827
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 430,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,138,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,813,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,325,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,325,068
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.29


</TABLE>