alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 OF PAINEWEBBER PREFERRED YIELD
FUND II LP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,748,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,127,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (75,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,800,541
<PP&E>                                      33,577,059
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,216,761)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,179,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,076,657
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,102,537<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,179,194
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,508,648
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,446,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,980,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F4>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,980,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,980,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    27.71<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET INCOME PER CLASS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT OUTSTANDING
<F2>REPRESENTS AGGREGATE PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
<F3>INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR WRITEDOWNS
<F4>INCOME TAXES ARE PROVIDED FOR ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, INCOME TAXES ARE
THE DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTNERS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of 

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Numbers 333-41323, as amended, 333-57557, and 333-127473) ofDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. of our report relating to the financial statements of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. dated February 3, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/    Plante & Moran, PLLC 

March 20, 2006 

Columbus, Ohio
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerry
Martin, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gerry Martin
-------------------------------------
Gerry Martin
President and CFO
November 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6014]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, if pro forma sessions are necessary--and it 
appears they are; the House turned down the adjournment resolution--
Senators should be aware that starting Tuesday, August 7, the pro forma 
sessions will be held in Hart 216 while repairs are made in the Senate 
Chamber.
  The next rollcall vote will be at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 
on confirmation of the Rose nomination.
  Additionally, this evening cloture was filed on the motion to proceed 
to S. 3457, the Veterans Jobs Corps Act. That vote will be at 2:15 p.m. 
on Tuesday, September 11.

                          ____________________
```
# Fannin - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#x62;&#x61;&#x75;&#x73;&#x74;&#x69;&#x6e;&#x40;&#x6e;&#x77;&#x67;&#x72;&#x63;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008158EN.01001001.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/10

---

Appeal brought on 1 April 2008 by Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 24 January 2008 in Case T-88/06, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Mark and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-131/08 P)

(2008/C 158/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. (represented by: Dr. G. Simon, Rechtsanwältin)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 24 January 2008, Case T-88/06; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 24 January 2008, Case T-88/06;

| — | annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 11 January 2006, Case R 616/2004-2 and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 11 January 2006, Case R 616/2004-2 and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the CFI's assessment of the conditions for registration of a trademark is too restrictive. The appellant argues that the CFI assessed the character of the term ‘SAFETY 1st’ by means of a separate analysis of the element ‘1st’ and based its judgment on the presumption that as the element ‘1st’ was devoid of a distinctive character it cannot acquire such character when combined with the trademark element ‘SAFETY’. According to the appellant the CFI should have assessed the distinctive character of the mark on the overall perception of the wording ‘SAFETY 1st’ by the average consumer. The splitting by the Court of the trademark ‘SAFETY 1st’ into its component parts does not reflect the view and approach adopted by consumers.

st

st

st

st

st

The contested judgment relies on a criterion according to which the expression safety first is used to designate the goods covered by the mark applied for ‘as information relating to a quality or characteristic of the goods’. The appellant submits that that criterion is relevant in the context of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 but it is not the yardstick against which Article 7(1)(b) thereof should be judged. Therefore, the Court based its view that the sign in question fell within the scope of Article 7(1)(b) on the fat that it did not satisfy the criteria for protection governed by Article 7(1)(c).

Finally the appellant submits that the CFI also ignored the fact that Article 12(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (1) constitutes a corrective to the interpretation of Article 7(1)(b).

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11).

1

---
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2008 – Commission v Luxembourg**

**(Case C-273/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2001/81/EC – Atmospheric pollutants – National emission ceilings – Failure to communicate programmes for the reduction of emissions, national emission inventories and annual projections for
the year 2010

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 8)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to draw up and communicate, within the prescribed periods, the documents provided for in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants (OJ 2001 L 309, p. 22). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to communicate to the Commission of the European Communities, within the prescribed period, the programmes, inventories and annual projections for the year 2010 relating to the progressive reduction of its emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOC) and ammonia (NH3), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iPayment, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I Clay M. Whitson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (c)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

      (d)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of August 16, 2004.

                                   /S/ CLAY M. WHITSON
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   CLAY M. WHITSON
                                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                          LANDRY'S RESTAURANTS, INC.

        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE--DILUTED

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Year Ended December 31,
                                                     -----------------------------------
                                                        2001        2000        1999
                                                     ----------- ----------- -----------
<S>                                                  <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Income.......................................... $26,919,569 $14,650,118 $15,375,733
                                                     =========== =========== ===========
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding..........  21,750,000  23,400,000  26,675,000
Common Stock Equivalents--Stock Options.............     785,000     200,000     350,000
                                                     ----------- ----------- -----------
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares
  Outstanding--(Diluted) ...........................  22,535,000  23,600,000  27,025,000
                                                     =========== =========== ===========
Net Income Per Share--(Diluted)..................... $      1.19 $      0.62 $      0.57
                                                     =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2009 – Calebus v Commission**

**(Case C‐421/08 P)**

Appeal – Protection of habitats – List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region – Commission decision – Action for annulment brought by natural or legal persons – Admissibility – Appeal clearly unfounded

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Absolute bar to proceeding
(Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see para. 21)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para.,
EC) (see paras 26, 28-30)*

3.                     *European Communities – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Need for natural or legal persons
to proceed by way of a preliminary ruling on validity (Arts 10 EC, 230, fourth para., EC and 234 EC) (see para. 38)*

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 14 July 2008 in Case T-366/06 | Calebus | v | Commission | , in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the application for partial annulment of Article 1 of Annex 1 of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Ramblas de Gergal, Tabernas y Sur de Sierra Alhamilla’, which includes land belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region. |

**Operative part:**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Calebus SA is ordered to bear its own costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs. |
From: "Backfisch Don (NORALNM)" <BackfisD@noralnm.com>

To: David Putney/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/07/2011 10:49 AM

Subject: Metals in Alumina

Attached are the files with the completed metals analysis for alumina in our dry scrubbers. 

These files contain the hexavalent chromium that was missing from our previous submission. 

The lab did not complete the hex chrome analyses in time for us to submit the results by the 

May 31 deadline.

<<Alumina Sampling Results with Hex Chrome.pdf>> <<Copy of PAL_114 letter-reporting spreadsheet 

for RTR.xls>> 

Don Backfisch

Environmental Superintendent

Noranda (NYSE: NOR)

P. O. Box 70

New Madrid, MO 63869

Phone: (573) 643-2361 x2126

Fax: (573) 643-6721

Email: backfisd@noralnm.com

Website: www.norandaaluminum.com
# C_2009267EN.01006302.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/63

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Boudova and Others v Commission

(Case T-271/08) (1)

1

(Appeal - Public service - Officials - Former members of the auxiliary staff - Appointment - Classification in grade - Competition published before the entry in force of the new Staff Regulations - Reclassification by another institution of its officials - Refusal to reclassify - Principle of equal treatment - Action for annulment - Non-actionable measure - Confirmatory act - Absence of new and substantive facts - Absence of excusable error - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 267/113

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Stanislava Boudova (Howald, Luxembourg); Iveta Adovica (Luxembourg, Luxembourg); Juraj Kuba (Konz, Germany); Heinrihs Puciriuss (Luxembourg); Agnieszka Strzelecka (Arlon, Belgium); Izabela Szyprowska (Berbourg, Luxembourg); Timea Tibai (Luxembourg); and Birute Vaituleviciene (Luxembourg) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2008 in Case F-78/07 Boudova and Others v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking the annulment of that order.

Boudova and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Stanislava Boudova, Iveta Adovica, Juraj Kuba, Heinrihs Puciriuss, Agnieszka Strzelecka, Izabela Szyprowska, Timea Tibai and Birute Vaituleviciene to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stanislava Boudova, Iveta Adovica, Juraj Kuba, Heinrihs Puciriuss, Agnieszka Strzelecka, Izabela Szyprowska, Timea Tibai and Birute Vaituleviciene to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4411 

To direct the Secretary of State to make available to the Director of the 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention copies of consular reports 

of death of United States citizens, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of State to make available to the 

Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention copies of consular reports of death of United States 

citizens, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Students 

5 Abroad Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4411 IH

1 SEC. 2. COPIES OF CONSULAR REPORTS OF DEATH OF U.S. 

2 CITIZENS ABROAD TO BE MADE AVAILABLE 

3 TO THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL 

4 AND PREVENTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall make 

6 available to the Director of the Centers for Disease Con7 trol and Prevention for each calendar quarter a copy of 

8 each report described in subsection (b) that is issued dur9 ing the preceding calendar quarter. 

10 (b) REPORT DESCRIBED.—The report described in 

11 this subsection is a report issued by a United States em12 bassy or consulate relating to the death of a United States 

13 citizen in a foreign country upon receipt by the embassy 

14 or consulate of the foreign death certificate or finding of 

15 death by a local competent authority. 

16 SEC. 3. SURVEILLANCE BY CDC OF DEATHS OF UNITED 

17 STATES CITIZENS ABROAD. 

18 The Public Health Service Act is amended by insert19 ing after section 317T of such Act (42 U.S.C. 247b–22) 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘SEC. 317U. SURVEILLANCE OF DEATHS OF UNITED STATES 

22 CITIZENS ABROAD. 

23 ‘‘The Secretary, acting through the Director of the 

24 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall expand 

25 and intensify the programs and activities of the Centers 

26 for surveillance of deaths of United States citizens occurVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:22 Nov 21, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4411.IH H4411

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4411 IH

1 ring abroad, including through the use of the reports made 

2 available to the Director pursuant to section 2 of the Ravi 

3 Thackurdeen Travel Safety Act.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2015155EN.01002001.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Slovenská pošta v Commission

(Case T-556/08) (1)

1

((Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Slovakian traditional mail and hybrid mail services markets - Decision finding an infringement of Article 86(1) EC in conjunction with Article 82 EC - Exclusive right to distribute hybrid mail - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Definition of the market - Extension of a monopoly - Article 86(2) EC - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations))

(2015/C 155/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Slovenská pošta a.s. (Banská Bystrica, Slovakia) (represented initially by O. Brouwer, C. Schillemans and M. Knapen, then by O. Brouwer and P. Schepens and, lastly, by O. Brouwer and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: R. Sauer, A. Tokár and A. Antoniadis, and subsequently by R. Sauer, A. Tokár and C. Vollrath, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, Agent)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Cromwell a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia); Slovak Mail Services a.s. (Bratislava); Prvá Doručovacia a.s. (Bratislava) (represented initially by M. Maier and P. Werner, and subsequently by P. Werner, lawyers); and ID Marketing Slovensko s.r.o., formerly TNT Post Slovensko s.r.o. (Bratislava) (represented initially by J. Ellison, Solicitor, and T. Rybár, lawyer, and subsequently by T. Rybár and I. Pecník, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 5912 final of 7 October 2008 on the Slovakian postal legislation relating to hybrid mail services (Case COMP/39.562 — Slovakian postal law).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Slovenská pošta a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, Cromwell a.s., Slovak Mail Services a.s., Prvá Doručovacia a.s. and ID Marketing Slovensko s.r.o.; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Slovenská pošta a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, Cromwell a.s., Slovak Mail Services a.s., Prvá Doručovacia a.s. and ID Marketing Slovensko s.r.o.;

| 3) | Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---