alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4430 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4430

   To provide temporary direct hire authority for certain emergency 
                          response positions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Olson, and Mr. 
Gene Green of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide temporary direct hire authority for certain emergency 
                          response positions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIRECT HIRE AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN EMERGENCY RESPONSE 
              POSITIONS.

    (a) In General.--As the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
determines necessary to respond to a critical hiring need for emergency 
response positions, after providing public notice and without regard to 
the provisions of sections 3309 through 3318 of title 5, United States 
Code, such Secretary may appoint candidates directly to the following 
positions:
            (1) Intermittent disaster-response personnel in the 
        National Disaster Medical System, pursuant to section 2812 of 
        the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300hh-11).
            (2) Not more than 150 positions in the Office of the 
        Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response within the 
        Department of Health and Human Services for purposes of public 
        health and medical emergency support.
    (b) Expiration.--The authority under subsection (a) shall expire 
270 days after the date of enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>   

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from accompanying
financial statements and is qualififed in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     32,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,359
<PP&E>                                          22,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,598
<SALES>                                         32,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,061
<CGS>                                           40,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (625)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

STEVEN FRANCIS REYCHLER,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 30225

D.C. No. 2:18

- cr

- 00004

- DLC

- 3

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Steven Francis Reychler appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United

States v. Keller

, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) , we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 30225

Reychler contends that he is entitled to compassionate release and the

district court failed to explain its decision to deny relief

. T he record reflects that

the district court considered Reychler’s arguments and adequately explained that,

though Reychler’s age and certain medical issues constituted an extraordinary and

compelling reason for his release

, release was unwarranted in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors, including the seriousness of the offense conduct, the downward

variance imposed at sentencing, and the needs to reflect the seriousness of the

offense and promote respect for the law. S ee Chavez

-

Meza v. United States , 138 S.

C t. 1959, 1965 (2018). The court’s decision to deny relief was not an abuse of

discretion

. See Keller

, 2 F.4th at 1284; United States v. Robertson , 895 F.3d 1206,

1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is

illogical , implausible, or not supported by the record ).

AFFIRMED

.
**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher J. Reed,
      Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











Christopher
      J. Reed,


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


And
      Chief
      Financial Officer


December
      6, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

RANDY LEE LITTLEBIRD, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-30286 

D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00158-SPW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Randy Lee Littlebird appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 300-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction 

for second degree murder committed on a reservation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 1111 and 1153; strangulation on a reservation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-30286 

and 1153; and domestic abuse by an habitual offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 117. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Littlebird contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of 

his genuine remorse and acceptance of responsibility. The district court did not 

abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 

within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of 

circumstances, see id., and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 sentencing factors, including 

Littlebird’s history and characteristics, the nature and circumstances of the 

offenses, the need to protect the public, and the need to provide just punishment for 

the offenses. Contrary to Littlebird’s argument, the fact that the 270-month 

sentence he recommended might have also satisfied the sentencing factors does not 

show that the 300-month sentence is substantively unreasonable. See Gall, 552 

U.S. at 51-52.

AFFIRMED.
July 26, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — DAILY DIGEST D787 

a Simpler, Fairer Tax Code Act of 2012’’. The bill 

was ordered reported, without amendment. 

REVIEW OF DOE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND 

ACTIVITIES: ASSURING APPROPRIATE 

AND EFFECTIVE USE OF TAXPAYER 

FUNDING 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Subcommittee on Energy and Environment held a hearing entitled ‘‘Review of DOE Vehicle Technologies 

Program Management and Activities: Assuring Appropriate and Effective Use of Taxpayer Funding’’. 

Testimony was heard from Kathleen Hogan, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Office of 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy; and Rickey R. Hass, Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections, Office of 

Inspector General, Department of Energy; and a 

public witness. 

FOREIGN TRADE BARRIERS FACING SMALL 

AGRICULTURE EXPORTERS 

Committee on Small Business: Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade held a hearing entitled 

‘‘Market Closed: Foreign Trade Barriers Facing Small 

Agriculture Exporters’’. Testimony was heard from 

public witnesses. 

MISCELLANEOUS MEASURES 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Full 

Committee held a markup of the following: H.R. 

3158, the ‘‘Farmers Undertake Environmental Land 

Stewardship Act’’; H.R. 5797, the ‘‘Mille Lacs Lake 

Freedom To Fish Act of 2012’’; and approval of 

General Services Administration Capital Investment 

and Leasing Program Resolutions. H.R. 5797 was 

ordered reported, as amended; and H.R. 3158 was 

ordered reported, without amendment. The Committee approved 13 of the General Services Administration Capital Investment and Leasing Program 

Resolutions. 

MISCELLANEOUS MEASURE 

Committee on Ways and Means: Full Committee held 

a markup of H.R. 6156, ‘‘The Russia and Moldova 

Jackson-Vanik Repeal Act of 2012’’. The bill was ordered reported, without amendment. 

ONGOING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence: Full 

Committee held a hearing on ongoing intelligence 

activities. This was a closed hearing. 

Joint Meetings 

No joint committee meetings were held. 

f 

NEW PUBLIC LAWS 

(For last listing of Public Laws, see DAILY DIGEST, p. D751) 

H.R. 4155, to direct the head of each Federal department and agency to treat relevant military training as sufficient to satisfy training or certification requirements for Federal licenses. Signed on July 23, 

2012. (Public Law 112–147) 

f 

COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR FRIDAY, 

JULY 27, 2012 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Senate 

No meetings/hearings scheduled. 

House 

No hearings are scheduled. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with DIGEST
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Treasure Mountain  Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  George I.  Norman,  III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certifies  to the best of his  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   George I. Norman, III
--------------------------------
      George I. Norman, III
      Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No.  333-76912) pertaining to the Emergisoft Holding, Inc. 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, the Emergisoft Holding, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and the
Emergisoft Holding, Inc.  2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated March 31, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Emergisoft Holding, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 31, 2002
# C_2009256EN.01000502.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy)) — Amministrazione dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate v Fallimento Olimpiclub Srl

(Case C-2/08) (1)

1

(VAT - Primacy of Community law - Provision of national law laying down the principle of res judicata)

2009/C 256/09

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Amministrazione dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate

Applicants:

Defendant: Fallimento Olimpiclub Srl

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corte suprema di cassazione — Interpretation of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Primacy of Community law — Provision of national law laying down the principle of res judicata leading to a result which is incompatible with Community VAT law

res judicata

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Community law precludes the application, in circumstances such as those of the case before the referring court, of a provision of national law, such as Article 2909 of the Italian Civil Code, in a dispute concerning value added tax and relating to a tax year for which no final judicial decision has yet been delivered, to the extent that it would prevent the national court seised of that dispute from taking into consideration the rules of Community law concerning abusive practice in the field of value added tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
Filed: April 23, 2001 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7396 (CR-90-74-A, CA-97-791-AM) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Henry Saunders, Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER The court amends its opinion filed April 16, 2001, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3; and on page 2, line 7 of text -- the first district court number is corrected to read “CR-90-74-A.” For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor ClerkUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7396
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HENRY SAUNDERS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-90-74-A, CA-97-791-AM) Submitted: March 23, 2001 Decided: April 16, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Henry Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999)and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Saunders , Nos. CR-90-74-A; CA-97-791-AM (E.D. Va. June 5 and Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Zix Corporation.
 /s/ Richard D. SpurrName:
    Richard D. SpurrTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Richard D. SpurrName:
    Richard D. SpurrTitle:
    Principal Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Virginia Wilson et al., Appellants, v Sharon N. Bush et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Sharon N. Bush as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1991, for the nomination of that party as its *935candidate for the public office of Member of New York City Council for the 28th Councilmanic District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated August 21, 1991, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that service was not made in accordance with the order to show cause. Accordingly, the proceeding was properly dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction *(see,*Election Law § 16-116; *Matter of Fratello v Kruger,*64 AD2d 937; *Matter of Bruno v Ackerson,*51 AD2d 1051, *affd*39 NY2d 718; *compare, Matter of Velez v Smith,*149 AD2d 753, 754, *with Matter of Reilly v Scaringe,*133 AD2d 900). Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Sullivan, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# C_2010024EN.01007303.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/73

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Aparicio, Simon and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases F-20/08, F-34/08 and F-75/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - Contract staff - Recruitment - CAST 27/Relex selection procedure - Non-inclusion in the database - Neutralisation of questions - Verbal and numerical reasoning test - Equal treatment)

2010/C 24/135

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jorge Aparicio (Antiguo Cuscatlan, El Salvador) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers) (Case F-20/08)

Applicants:

and

Anne Simon (Nouackhott, Mauritania) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E.Marchal, lawyers) (Case F-34/08)

and

Jorge Aparicio, (Antiguo Cuscatlan, El Salvador) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers) (Case F-75/08)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of EPSO not to include the applicants’ names on the list of successful candidates and in the database for the CAST 27/Relex recruitment procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions in F-20/08, F-34/08 and F-75/08; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions in F-20/08, F-34/08 and F-75/08;

| 2. | Orders Mr Aparicio and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex under Nos 1 to 18 to pay the costs in Case F-20/08 and nineteen forty-sixths of the costs in Case F-75/08. Orders Ms Simon to pay the costs in Case F-34/08 and one forty-sixth of the costs in Case F-75/08. Orders the applicants whose names are listed in the Annex under Nos 19 to 40 and 42 to 46 to pay twenty-six forty-sixths of the costs in Case F-75/08. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Aparicio and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex under Nos 1 to 18 to pay the costs in Case F-20/08 and nineteen forty-sixths of the costs in Case F-75/08. Orders Ms Simon to pay the costs in Case F-34/08 and one forty-sixth of the costs in Case F-75/08. Orders the applicants whose names are listed in the Annex under Nos 19 to 40 and 42 to 46 to pay twenty-six forty-sixths of the costs in Case F-75/08.

---

(1)  F-20/08: OJ C 92, 12.4.2008, p. 52.

1

F-34/08: OJ C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 36.

F-75/08: OJ C 285, 8.11.2008, p. 56.

---