alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(July 18, 1991)

#### David H. Harmon, Respondent, v Jeffrey I. Marks, Appellant.

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pécora, J.), entered on August 10, 1990, which, *inter alia,*appointed a temporary receiver, unanimously reversed, *45on the law, and the matter is remanded for a hearing on plaintiffs application for an accounting, and is to be assigned to a different Judge, with costs.

The record in this law firm dissolution action does not support the Motion Court’s appointment of a temporary receiver. In support of his application for an accounting, to which the Motion Court responded by appointing a receiver, plaintiff submitted nothing more than his own affidavit expressing dissatisfaction with defendant’s handling of the firm’s caseload. The two page complaint alleges that due to defendant’s actions, clients of the firm have suffered serious delay in the prosecution of their cases to their extreme prejudice.

We are advised in plaintiffs memorandum of law that plaintiff has written a series of letters to the Motion Court. These are not part of the record, and are thus not considered on this appeal.

The appointment of a receiver is a drastic remedy used sparingly in partnership dissolution actions. *(See, Shapiro v Ostrow,*46 AD2d 859; *Glassner v Kaufman,*19 AD2d 885.)

Plaintiffs general assertions fall far short of the detailed evidentiary showing required for the appointment of a temporary receiver. *(See Mandel v Grunfeld,*111 AD2d 668.) Concur —Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:02 AM

To: 'xcamaerialsolutions@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: X-cam Aerial Solutions, Inc. (FAA-2015-0906)

June 4, 2015 

Dear Mr. Bond: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0906). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 18, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
Order entered August 9 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00850
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C.R. E. AND C.E., CHILDRE N On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Co urt

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1
- 17
- 0149



### O RDER This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights as petitioned for by appellee, the mother of the children. The clerk’s record contains “Defendant’s
Fina ncial Affidavit” filed on May 2, 2018. In the affidavit, appellant states he is providing the information “as part of my application for a court appointed attorney.” The clerk’s record does not contain an order appointing an attorney and appellant appear ed pro se at trial. Appellant is presumed indigent and is entitled to proceed without prepayment of costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1. A ppellant is currently incarcerated. In his notice of appeal, appellant states that he cannot afford a lawyer.
Texas Fa mily Code section 107.021 provides that, in a suit in which the best interests of a child are at issue, other than a suit filed by a governmental entity requesting termination of the parent

- child relationship or appointment of the entity as conservator of the child, the trial court may appoint an attorney ad litem. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 107.021(a) (West 2014 ).Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing,

WITHIN TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, and determ ine whether or not to appoint counsel for appellant. The trial court shall make written findings as to whether to appoint counsel for appellant and, if counsel is appointed, the contact information for counsel . We ORDER the trial court to transmit to thi s Court, WITHIN TWENTY
- FIVE DAYS of the date of this order, the reporter’s record from the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s written findings of fact and any order appointing counsel.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court t o send a copy of this order to the Honorable Brett Hall, Presiding Judge of the 382nd Judicial District Court, Lea Carlson, Rockwall County District Clerk, Linda Kaiser, Official Court Reporter for the 382nd Judicial District Court, and all parties.
We ABA TE this appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal will be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the requested supplemental records are received, whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
IB 

Union Calendar No. 430 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4248 

[Report No. 115–570] 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain disclosure 

requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2017 

Mr. HUIZENGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

FEBRUARY 20, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH and Mr. SENSENBRENNER

FEBRUARY 20, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4248 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal 

certain disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other purposes. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4248 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CONFLICT MINERAL REQUIRE4 MENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (p) of section 13 of the 

6 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is here7 by repealed. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Dodd-Frank 

9 Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 

10 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended— 

11 (1) by striking section 1502; and 

12 (2) in the table of contents in section 1(b) of 

13 such Act, by striking the item relating to section 

14 1502. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 430 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4248 

[Report No. 115–570] 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to 

conflict minerals, and for other purposes. repeal certain disclosure requirements related to 

FEBRUARY 20, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2020320EN.01002003.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 3 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankenthal — Germany) — OK v Daimler AG

(Case C-685/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/40)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Calvert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
amended Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such amended
Annual Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    DENNIS
CALVERT
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Dennis Calvert President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

I, Charles K. Dargan II, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amended Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such amended Annual Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    CHARLES K. DARGAN
II
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | Charles K. Dargan II Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1381]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          HONORING JOHN BOGERT

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JANICE HAHN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Ms. HAHN. Mr. Speaker. I rise today to honor the memory of John 
Bogert, who passed away on July 29, 2012 at the age of 63 following a 
lengthy battle with cancer.
  John Bogert was a columnist for the Daily Breeze, a South Bay local 
staple, for 28 years. In that time, he wrote some 6,500 columns. He 
worked hard, writing five or six columns weekly, and his efforts did 
not go unrecognized. By the end of his life he was known as the ``Voice 
of the South Bay.''
  He wrote about anything and everything, but some of my favorite 
columns were those he wrote about his family. These columns were 
honest--sometimes brutally so--and gave readers insight into a life 
that often seemed very familiar. He had an uncanny ability to draw 
readers into his experiences and after reading his columns, his 
followers felt that they knew him. His book signings were characterized 
by long lines and his appearance at local events drew crowds of people 
waiting to shake his hand. He even wrote one of his columns on me as he 
attempted to capture a ``Day in the Life of Janice Hahn''--it was one 
of my favorite writings on my life.
  John was born on October 7, 1948 in Utica, New York and spent much of 
his childhood in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. He attended the University 
of Florida where he started his own newspaper and starred on the track 
team. After some time abroad, he moved to Southern California where he 
was hired by the Daily Breeze in 1979. He did not originally plan on 
staying long, but he became one of the Breeze's longest tenured 
journalists until his departure in June of this year.
  He once said in an interview that journalism gave him the opportunity 
to ``meet some pretty great people.'' And indeed he met with so many 
interesting figures, from presidents to nuns to an encounter that let 
him drop the line, ``Stalin's interpreter once told me . . .''
  John Bogert leaves behind three children: Caitlin, 29, Rachel, 25 and 
Ian, 18. His eldest daughter is expecting his first grandchild in 
September. The granddaughter will be named Charlotte, a name picked by 
John himself. I consider myself incredibly lucky to have known John, 
and to have considered him a close friend. His family, friends, 
colleagues and so many readers will miss him dearly. I know that I 
will.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 21.1
 CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES OF CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
  State ofCorporate Name
    
    OrganizationDurocraft International, Inc.
    
    TexasC/D/R Incorporated
    
    DelawareTrade Source International, Inc.
    
    DelawareTSI Prime Asia Limited
    
    Hong KongElitex Development Limited
    
    Hong KongPrime/Home Impressions, LLC
    
    North CarolinaDesign Trends, LLC
(in which Craftmade owns a 50% interest)
    
    DelawareWoodard-CM, LLC
    
    DelawareCM-Real Estate, LLC
    
    Delaware
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2009 – Commission v Netherlands**

**(Case C‐255/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 85/337/EEC – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Determination of thresholds – Size of the project – Incomplete transposition

Environment – Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment – Directive 85/337 – Projects belonging to the classes listed in Annex II – Member States’ discretion – Limits (Council Directive 85/337, as amended by Directives 97/11 and 2003/35, Arts 2(1), 3 and 4(2) and (3), and Annexes
II and III) (see paras 29-35, 39, 42-43 and operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Incorrect transposition of Article 4(2) and (3) in conjunction with Annexes II and III of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directives 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC (OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the provisions necessary to ensure that projects likely to have significant effects on the environment are made subject to a consent procedure and to an assessment of those effects, in accordance with Article 4(2) and (3) of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 and by Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003, in conjunction with Annexes II and III to Directive 85/337, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. PEARCE:
        H.R. 6343.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the 
     United States grants Congress the power to enact this law.
```
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                    CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)

      The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of TransCommunity Financial Corporation,
respectively, certify that, to the best of each such individual's knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of TransCommunity Financial
Corporation Incorporated at the dates and for the periods indicated. The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.


                                            /s/  WILLIAM C. WILEY
                                             ---------------------------
                                             William C. Wiley
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                            /s/ BRUCE B. NOLTE
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Bruce B. Nolte
                                             Chief Operating Officer

                                            /s/  THOMAS M. CROWDER
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Thomas M. Crowder
                                             Chief Financial Officer

      Dated: November 12, 2004
# Economic Status - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky: Revitalizing, Redeveloping and Reinvesting in Communities This story is one of several “Stories of Change” highlighted in a new evaluation of ARC’s POWER Initiative.The post Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky: Revitalizing, Redeveloping and Reinvesting in Communities appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Deaton and * From the 48 th District Court

Deaton Law Firm, LLC, of Tarrant County,

Trial Court No. 048

- 283747

- 16.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 1 26

- C V * August 21 , 20 2 4

Law Offices of Steven M. Johnson, P.C.

, * Opinion by Trotter, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against John Deaton and Deaton Law Firm, LLC

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201325-001.                

*Agreement Name:*                     Sealand/Network Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Maersk A/S; Network Shipping, Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne Rohde; Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Amendment changes the name of the agreement and deletes Panama, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Mexico from the geographic scope of the agreement. The Amendment changes the authority that Maersk had to charter space to Network to now authorizing Network to charter space to Maersk. The Amendment deletes obsolete language from the agreement and adds new language, revises the notice for termination and updates the persons to whom the notice is to be provided. The Amendment also restates the Agreement.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     1/26/2024.                

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​25450.*

Dated: December 15, 2023.

Carl Savoy,

Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-27959 Filed 12-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00104-CV

CAROLYN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

LADERA, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV-2020-00600-JP)

June 3, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr