alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF
                  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION #1350



In connection with the Annual Report of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bing Yeh,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 31st day of March, 2005.

/s/ Bing Yeh	                   Bing Yeh		
   President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1795]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nevada Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Nevada Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:30 
p.m. and adjourn at approximately 4:30 p.m. on Friday, February 25, 
2011, at the Clark County Public Library, 1401 E. Flamingo Road, Las 
Vegas, NV 89119. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee to 
discuss its report on the status of civil rights.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office of the 
Commission by Friday, March 25, 2011. The address is 300 N. Los Angeles 
St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, California 90012. Persons wishing to e-
mail their comments or who desire additional information should contact 
Angelica Trevino, Administrative Assistant, at (213) 894-3437 or (800) 
877-8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have 
speech disabilities or by e-mail to: atrevino@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who wish to submit written comments and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, January 24, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-1795 Filed 1-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  September 11, 2007
    By:
    /s/ James R. RidingsJames R. RidingsChairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Craftmade International, Inc.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Petition for exemption/rulemaking. Please see corresponding attachments.
#### Lori Legere, Respondent, v Eastern Ambulance, Inc., et al., Appellants. Beth A. Bruce, Respondent, v Eastern Ambulance, Inc., et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer to allege the affirmative defense of exclusivity of workers’ compensation as plaintiffs’ remedy. Leave to amend shall be freely given absent prejudice or surprise *(Fahey v County of Ontario,*44 NY2d 934, 935; *see,*CPLR 3025 [b]). Defendants have established a prima facie basis for assertion of the proposed defense *(see, Hawkins v Genesee Place Corp.,*139 AD2d 433, 434) and plaintiffs have failed to establish prejudice or surprise if the motion is granted *(see, Caceras v Zorbas,*74 NY2d 884, 885; *De Forte v Allstate Ins. Co.,*66 AD2d 1028). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Miller, J.— Amended Answer.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HONDA:
       H.R. 6331.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 6 of the Constitution--``To 
     coin Money . . .''
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1400-E1401]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           IN CELEBRATION OF THE 100TH BIRTHDAY OF EMMA SHAW

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JOE BACA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. BACA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to ask Congress to congratulate 
Emma Shaw, a beloved and respected community member of San Bernardino, 
who is celebrating her 100th Birthday on August 9, 2012.
  Born in Tallulah, Louisiana, Emma was raised and began her education 
in Louisiana where she attended Madison Parish Training School. During 
her schooling, she met her future husband George Shaw, whom she married 
on February 6, 1933.
  Emma and George Shaw lived in Tallulah for nine years, until moving 
to Las Vegas, Nevada, in 1942 in search of a better life for their 
family. Two years later, in 1944, the family moved to San Bernardino, 
California, where the Shaw family has resided since.
  In San Bernardino, George Shaw worked hard as a construction worker, 
and was also the only African American barber in San Bernardino for 
many years. Emma worked as a housekeeper to help provide for her 11 
children. Although times were tough and money was tight, Emma always 
found extra time and resources to give back to her community and those 
in need.
  Since moving to San Bernardino, Emma and her family have been active 
members at the New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, and later the 
Greater New Jerusalem Church of God in Christ. Emma is known for her 
kindness and generosity; all who know Emma affectionately call her 
``Mother Shaw''. Emma

[[Page E1401]]

often shares her wealth of experiences that she gained over the years 
in order to educate and pass on her wisdom to the younger generations.
  I wish Emma the best as she celebrates her 100th Birthday with a 
large family gathering on August 11, 2012. Her 8 living children, 45 
grandchildren, 87 great grandchildren, and 9 great-great grandchildren 
will join Emma in celebrating this monumental milestone. My 
congratulations go out to Emma, along with those of my wife, Barbara, 
and my children, Rialto Councilman Joe Baca Jr., Jeremy, Natalie, and 
Jennifer. Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me today in 
congratulating a beloved community member, Emma Shaw.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2010024EN.01001402.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 December 2009 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission

(Case C-476/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Regulations (EC, Euratom) Nos 1605/2002 and 2342/2002 - Public contracts awarded by the Community institutions on their own account - Error in the evaluation committee’s report - Obligation to state reasons for the rejection of the tender’s bid)

2010/C 24/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: (N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and E. Manhaeve, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2008 in Case T-59/05 Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v Commission of the European Communities by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 23 November 2004 rejecting the tender submitted by the appellant in the tendering procedure relating to the provision of development, maintenance and related support services for the financial information systems of the Directorate-General for Agriculture and of the decision awarding the contract to another tenderer — Obligation to state reasons for the rejection of a submitted tender

Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE

Commission of the European Communities

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Linesch, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:     August 21, 2009




/s/ James Linesch


James Linesch


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)




A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ANNUAL REPORT OF

LANDRYS RESTAURANTS, INC.



The undersigned, being the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Landrys Restaurants, Inc. (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, do hereby certify that to each of their respective knowledge with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005. (the Report):



| | 1. | that the Report fully complies with all requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 16, 2005



/s/    Tilman J. FertittaTilman J. Fertitta Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Rick H. LiemRick H. Liem Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1331]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 CONGRESSIONAL REPLACEMENT OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S ENERGY-RESTRICTING AND 
                  JOB-LIMITING OFFSHORE DRILLING PLAN

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                        HON. CAROLYN B. MALONEY

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 24, 2012

       The House in Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
     the Union had under consideration the bill (H.R. 6082) to 
     officially replace, within the 60-day Congressional review 
     period under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, President 
     Obama's Proposed Final Outer Continental Shelf Oil & Gas 
     Leasing Program (2012-2017) with a congressional plan that 
     will conduct additional oil and natural gas lease sales to 
     promote offshore energy development, job creation, and 
     increased domestic energy production to ensure a more secure 
     energy future in the United States, and for other purposes:

  Mrs. MALONEY. Mr. Chair, while the American people are asking 
Congress to help create jobs and stabilize the economy, the House 
Majority would rather spend valuable time on handouts to big oil and 
gas. For the 11th time this Congress, Members are being asked to 
support giveaways to big producers and polluters. It is ironic that 
this bill is being debated at the same time the U.S. Chemical Safety 
Board released its report that the Deepwater Horizon disaster was 
caused by a lack of adherence to safety guidelines. Instead of 
thoughtful efforts to ensure health and safety of workers and the 
public, as well as the protection of the environment, H.R. 6082 ignores 
any lessons from that tragedy while opening huge portions of our coasts 
to drilling. In addition, as someone who has fought to make sure the 
American taxpayer is properly compensated for energy resources 
extracted from federally leased lands, I am disturbed that this bill 
would not ensure oil companies pay their fair share for drilling on 
public lands. This bill does nothing to help our country build a strong 
energy future or get Americans back to work. I urge my colleagues to 
vote ``no.''

                          ____________________
```
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                         ------------------------------

                         Brazauro Resources Corporation
                        (a British Columbia corporation)

                    Owns 100% of the following corporations:

                                 Star U.S. Inc.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

                                       and

                        Jaguar Resources do Brasil Ltda.
                            (a Brazilian corporation)


                         Star U.S. Inc. Owns 100% of the
                          following three corporations:

                Diamond Operations, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
               Diamond Exploration, Inc. (an Arkansas corporation)
              Continental Diamonds, Inc. (an Arkansas corporation)













                                   EXHIBIT 22
#### Jess H. Freedman, Plaintiff, *v.*Statewide Machinery, Inc. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Monroe County,

November 10, 1959.

*Levitt, BooTcbinder*itfi *Levine (Alan H. Levine*of counsel), for Statewide Machinery, Inc., defendant.

*Samuel Jacobs*for plaintiff.

G. Robert Witmer, J.

Pursuant to rule 9-a of the Rules of Civil Practice the defendant Statewide Machinery, Inc. served notice through its attorneys herein upon the attorney for the plaintiff, demanding a verified statement setting for the post-office address and residence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s attorney submitted a letter for the plaintiff in response to the demand, stating that the plaintiff’s address is as indicated in the pleadings and that the plaintiff was out of the State at the time. Thereupon the defendant moved to stay the plaintiff from proceeding with this action until he should comply with the demand.

The plaintiff contends that under the rule it is necessary for the defendant personally to make the demand upon the plaintiff personally, and he cites a statement in Bender’s New York Practice (Vol. 2, p. 226) as authority for his position. It is *931there stated that in the absence of a decision on the point, ‘ ‘ it will be wise for the party himself to make the demand and for this to be served upon the other party.” It should be noted that the author also said, ‘ *‘*There is no good reason why the demand could not be made by the attorney for one party and served upon the attorney for the other.” I agree with such statement and so hold.

Unless a statute or rule expressly or by clear intent provides to the contrary, an attorney should be permitted to act for his client. (Cf. Rules Civ. Prac., rule 115.) Clearly there is nothing in the purpose of this rule which would call for personal demand by the defendant. Neither should there be a requirement that the demand be served personally upon the plaintiff. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 163.) Where a defendant feels the need to invoke rule 9-a, it is quite possible, if not likely, that he will have difficulty in effecting personal service upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff acts through his attorney in the action, and notice to his attorney is sufficient notice to him in this respect.

The situation is different with respect to a verified answer to the demand. To avoid equivocation and circumvention of the substance of the rule the plaintiff should answer it by verified statement, and it has been so held. *(Fischer*v. *Seamen’s Church Inst, of N. Y.,*195 Misc. 471, affd. as to this point 275 App. Div. 1047; see 2 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 530.)

The motion is therefore granted. Moreover, under the prayer for such other relief as may be just, the court further rules that if compliance with the demand, herein ordered, is not made within 20 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, an order may be presented dismissing-the complaint. *(Fischer*v. *Seamen’s Church Inst, of N. Y., supra;*Rules Civ. Prac., rule 9-a.)

Submit order accordingly.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 4.6


                                June 3, 1998



VIA FACSIMILE
-------------

Nelson Partners


     Re: Exercise of Warrants/Issuance of Common Stock
         ---------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

     This letter confirms that SyQuest Technology, Inc. ("SyQuest") and Nelson
Partners ("Warrant Holder") agree as follows:

     1.  Warrant Holder will exercise 1,000,000 shares of Warrant No. 81 it
received in connection with its purchase of the company's Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series 5 at $3.0469 per share to acquire 1,000,000 shares of the
Company's common stock for total proceeds of $3,046,900 (the "Proceeds").

     2.  Upon receipt of the proceeds, plus an additional $169.64 representing
the par value for an additional 1,696,372 shares (the "Additional Common
Shares") of the Company's common stock, the Company will issue a total of
2,696,372 shares of common stock to Warrant Holder.

     3.  The Additional Common Shares shall have piggy-back registration rights
so that they will be registered in a future registration statement consistent
with existing Company contractual obligations regarding registrations, provided
however that the Company agrees to register such shares no later than September
25, 1998, subject to delays caused by reasonable business considerations, but in
any event agrees to register such shares no later than shares issued to RGC
International, CC Investments, Combination, Inc. and Fletcher International from
those transactions represented in SyQuest's 8-K dated March and April of 1998.

     4.  The Proceeds plus the additional $169.64 will be wire-transferred to
the following account:  Bank of America, 1850 Gateway Blvd., 4th Floor, Concord,
CA 94520, ABA #121-000-358, Account #12334-56287.

     5.  The Company will deliver the shares of common stock issued upon
exercise of the warrants in accordance with the terms of the warrants, and it
will direct its transfer agent to deliver
<PAGE>
 
such shares electronically without a restrictive legend provided that Warrant
Holder complies with the applicable prospectus delivery requirements under the
Securities Act of 1933 and provides notice to the Company using the attached
form.

     The Company acknowledges that Warrant Holder is relying on information
disclosed in the Company's public filings with the SEC and confirms that it is
aware of no material misstatements or omissions in those filings.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:

SyQuest Technology, Inc.                Nelson Partners
 
 
 
/s/                                     K A Simpler
--------------------------------------  -------------------------------------
Thomas C. Tokos                         Authorized representative
Vice President, General Counsel and     Director, Citadel Investment Group,
Secretary                               LLP
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elelcida Melendez, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered April 3, 1989, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*270Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.