alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Audited Consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1188
<ALLOWANCES>                                       233
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2665
<PP&E>                                           48096
<DEPRECIATION>                                   13749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   37815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       20829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     37815
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 26284
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (264)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (976)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
JOHN A. SPRING 

MAYOR 

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

CITYOFQUINCY 

February 11, 2011 

FPARTKeTOf 

FEB n P^-- 34 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

After talking with all members of the City of Quincy Aeronautics Committee they have voted 

unanimously to support the recommendation of Cape Air and its Essential Air Service proposal providing 

for six (6) dajly flights over a four (4) year contract term with the City of Quincy, Illinois. 

The City of Quincy and our residents are extremely satisfied with service that Cape Air has 

provided since November 2009. Over 14,000 passengers have flown Cape Air out of Quincy to St. Louis 

and St. Louis to Quincy. We are anticipating this passenger number will grow to over 20,000 in 2011. 

After many years of poor service we finally have a committed provider. 

We are very pleased that Cape Air's proposal includes the establishment of a local ticket office 

and the wonderful decision to provide ground shuttle transportation for Cape Air passengers to the East 

Terminal in St. Louis. Being able to move these passengers that have already been through security to the 

other terminal will prove to be an outstanding service. I would recommend that Cape Air's new contract 

and EAS subsidy request be put into effect as soon as possible so these new services can be started 

without delay. 

During the past thirteen months that Cape Air has been serving the Quincy Regional Airport we 

have witnessed a renewed confidence with our business and traveling community. Cape Air has brought 

the region a quality and affordable service to the national air transportation system. 

Thank you for this opportunity to support the continuation of Cape Air as our regional carrier. 

Sincerely, 

^^^ ^ John A. Spring 

Mayor 

JAS: jih 

Printed on 

Recycled Paper
#### Bill BUSBY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12902.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 4, 1961.

Wilson Smithen, Chickasha, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

This is an appeal by Bill Busby, plaintiff in error, defendant below, from a conviction in the district court of Grady County, Oklahoma, for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. 37 O.S.1951 § 1. Defendant was charged therein by information for said offense, after several former convictions (37 O.S.1951 § 1, and 37 O.S. 1951 § 12). He was tried by a jury, which fixed his punishment upon conviction at $2,000 fine, and six months in the county jail, and judgment and sentence was entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The contentions of the defendant are not separated, but are presented in shotgun fashion.

The guilt of the defendant in this case of selling intoxicating liquor is conclusive beyond any reasonable doubt, clearly established by the State’s evidence through a member of the press, who made the purchase. The defendant offered no evidence in his own behalf.

While there are a few errors, none of them constitute grounds for reversal. They do, as contended by counsel for defendant, constitute grounds for modification. Some of those possessing some materiality are as follows:

(1) On the voir dire it appears until the court admonished the county attorney, he asked some of the jurors if they were familiar with the defendant’s reputation. (2) The argument of the county attorney discloses resort to improprieties, such as reference to the fact that he did ask the defendant Busby to turn in his Federal liquor dealer’s stamp.

*662If it were not for the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, we would be compelled to reverse the case, hut under the provisions of 22 O.S.1951, § 1066, the error creates a situation requiring modification, in keeping with the rule, where the Court of Criminal Appeals is of the opinion that the punishment is excessive and in part is the result of prejudice, the remedy is by modification, and not reversal. Johnson v. State, 70 Okl.Cr. 270, 106 P.2d 149; Daves v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 343, 141 P.2d 603.

The judgment and sentence is modified to ninety days in jail, and a fine of $1,000, and as so modified, is affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
Summary of Credit Agreement  between Speech Design GmbH and  Stadtsparkasse
Munchen

     Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, dated December 11, 1995 (the
"Credit   Agreement"),   between  Speech  Design  GmbH  ("Speech   Design")  and
Stadtsparkasse Munchen (the "Lender"),  Lender agrees to extend to Speech Design
a credit line in the aggregate amount of DM 4,000,000. Interest on any borrowing
under the credit line is payable at 8.25% per annum.  The term of this agreement
is December  31,  1999,  subject to earlier  termination.  As  security  for any
extension  of credit  pursuant  to the Credit  Agreement,  Speech  Design made a
general assignment of claims,  receivables and inventory in favor of the Lender.
The  Credit  Agreement  also  contains  customary  provisions  regarding  Speech
Design's  duty to disclose  information  to the Lender,  choice of forum and the
validity of the agreement.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Cancer 
Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory 
Committee.
    The meeting will be held as a virtual meeting and is open to the 
public. Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need 
special assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the 
meeting, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of 
the meeting. The meeting can be accessed from the NIH VideoCast at the 
following link: https://videocast.nih.gov/.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and 
Translational Research Advisory Committee.
    Date: March 13, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Strategic Discussion of NCI's Clinical and Translational 
Research Programs.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 
Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sheila A. Prindiville, M.D., M.P.H., Director, 
Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive Room 6W136, 
Rockville, MD 20850 240-276-6173 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d4d6cdcac0cdd2d7e4c9c5cdc88acacdcc8ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98e8eaf1f6fcf1eeebd8f5f9f1f4b6f6f1f0b6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/ctac/ctac.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 19, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28329 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 13.1



906 Certification



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The
certificate set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, (the Report) for the purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Lu Yiping, the Chairman of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect, the financial condition and results of operations of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company
Limited.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 17, 2004



By:

/s/ Lu YipingName:

Lu YipingTitle:

Chairman




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and will be retained by Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.1(c)


 EXHIBIT 10.1(c) 

Appendix A to Executive Employment Letter dated December 22, 2016 

Executive: Luciano Siracusano III 

Introductory Paragraph: 
 WTAM – Executive Vice
President-Chief Investment Strategist 
 WTI – Same 
 No
previous employment agreement 
 Paragraph 1: 

$300,000 
 Paragraph 3(a): 

January 26, 2009 
 Paragraph 3(b): 

January 14, 2014, January 28, 2015 and January 27, 2016 

Paragraph 14: 
 Chief Executive Officer 

Paragraphs 4(j) and 14: 
 Indemnification Agreement dated
April 26, 2011
#### State v. Huddy

19576

3/6/97

Affirmed
January 22, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Company Name Change

Department of Transportation Representatives: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ("Reform Act") 

and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Jeff Bennett Engineering, hereby submits the following amendment to its 

Petition for Exemption filed November 25, 2015 tracking number: 1jz-8mgh-liq1.

The Petition for Exemption was filed on behalf of "Jeff Bennett Engineering" on November 

25, 2016. Since filing, the Petitioner business name has changed to “Bennett Analytics Corporation”. 

Accordingly, Petitioner respectfully requests that the docket and Exemption Request Letter “Jeff 

Bennett Engineering Sec 333 Petition for Exemption” be amended as well. 

The Petitioner does not seek any changes to the request for exemption beyond this request. 

This requested amendment is in the public interest, as having the petitioner correctly identified in the 

Grant of Exemption will avoid confusion and further the FAA's interests in accountability. 

If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

Grady Boyce

gboyce@skygenavaition.com

770-733-2939
Exhibit 10.8.1


 


AMENDMENT
ONE


TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment One to the Employment
Agreement (“First Amendment”) is made as of the 4th day of November, 2004
between VIRGINIA HONEY COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Company”) and TERRY W. HESS (the “Employee”).


 


RECITALS


 


1.                                       The
Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement on July 1, 2001
(“Employment Agreement”) whereby the
Company hired the Employee to serve as an executive officer of the Company.


 


2.                                       The
Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement extending the
term of the Employment Agreement.


 


CLAUSES


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of
the above premises and mutual agreements hereinafter set forth, the Employee
and the Company agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings as set forth in the Employment Agreement.


 


2.                                       Term.  Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is
hereby deleted and replaced by the following new Section 3:


 


“3.                                 TERM.  The term of
Terry’s employment under this Agreement shall be for the period commencing from
the Closing Date and continuing through December 31, 2007, subject to
early termination as set forth herewith (the “Term”).”


 


3.                                       Ratification.  In all other respects, the Employment
Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, is hereby ratified and
confirmed.


 





















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employee and the Company
have executed and delivered this First Amendment as of the date first shown
above.


 


 


	
  EMPLOYEE:

  	
  COMPANY:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  TERRY W.
  HESS

  	
  VIRGINIA
  HONEY COMPANY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Address:

  	
  2222 West
  Lake Street

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chicago,
  Illinois  60612
##### 



Three Months Ended
    
    
    Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    September 30,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Basic Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    813,564
    
    
    $
    689,373
    
    
    $
    2,264,123
    
    
    $
    1,969,930Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,505,785
    
    
    
    2,644,957
    
    
    
    2,536,201
    
    
    
    2,644,963Basic Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    0.26
    
    
    $
    0.89
    
    
    $
    0.74Diluted Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    813,564
    
    
    $
    689,373
    
    
    $
    2,264,123
    
    
    $
    1,969,930Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,531,456
    
    
    
    2,644,957
    
    
    
    2,536,201
    
    
    
    2,644,963Weighted average effect of
assumed stock options
    
    
    2,149
    
    
    
    4,933
    
    
    
    3,212
    
    
    
    3,813Total
    
    
    2,533,605
    
    
    
    2,649,890
    
    
    
    2,539,413
    
    
    
    2,648,776Diluted Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    0.26
    
    
    $
    0.89
    
    
    $
    0.74
 22.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 5944-024]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license to continue to operate and maintain the Moretown No. 8 Hydroelectric Project. The project is located on the Mad River in Washington County, Vermont. Commission staff has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project.

The FEA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

                    The Commission provides all interested persons with an opportunity to view and/or print the EA via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (                    *http://www.ferc.gov/​*), using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field, to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *https://ferconline.ferc.gov/​FERCOnline.aspx*                     to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.                

                    For further information, contact Maryam Zavareh at (202) 502-8474 or by email at                     *Maryam.Zavareh@ferc.gov.*

Dated: December 19, 2023.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-28436 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 March 2009 – Commission v Poland**

**(Case C‐143/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2006/73/EC – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to give effect to Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that directive (OJ 2006 L 241, p. 26). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that directive, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek Jackson, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered August 30, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the prison sentence he received of 5 to 15 years was clearly not harsh or excessive. The crime to which he pleaded guilty was a serious one which, according to the presentence report, had a devastating impact on the victim *(see, People v Sinclair,*150 AD2d 950). Furthermore, the sentence was well within the statutory guidelines, was in accordance with the plea-bargain agreement and was in full satisfaction of a seven-count indictment. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion by County Court in the sentence it imposed *(see, People v Jefferson,*161 AD2d 898, *lv denied*76 NY2d 790).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HASTINGS of Florida:
       H.R. 6327.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Section 8 of Article 1 of the Constitution
```