alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1353

KINGSLEY ANYANWUTAKU, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FLEET MORTGAGE GROUP, INCORPORATED; HOUSEHOLD MORTGAGE SERVICES; SHAPIRO & BURSON; JOHN S. BURSON; WILLIAM M. SAVAGE; RON BROWN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-1104-AW) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kingsley Anyanwutaku, Appellant Pro Se. Santiago Ricardo Narvaiz, LAW OFFICES OF S. RICARDO NARVAIZ, Fairfax, Virginia; Peter Henrik Gunst, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, GOLDMAN & THOMAS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kingsley Anyanwutaku appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his suit challenging a foreclosure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anyanwutaku v. Fleet Mortgage Group , No. CA-99-1104-AW (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of J. Gilbert Maurer, Individually and as President of U. S. Route 9 Improvement Association, Inc., and on Behalf of Himself and All Other Residents and Property Owners in the Towns of Clifton Park and Halfmoon, County of Saratoga, Similarly Situated, et al., Petitioners, against J. Burch McMorran, Individually and as Superintendent of the Department of Public Works of the State of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Albany County,

November 24, 1959.

*Conway, Conway S Conway (Edward 8. Conway*of counsel), for petitioners.

*Louis J. LefJcowits, Attorney-General (Arthur W. Mattson, Joseph A. Romano,*and *Grace K. Banoff*of counsel), for respondent.

Roscos V. Elsworth, J.

Petitioners in this article 78 proceeding seek an order directing the Superintendent of the Department of Public Works of the State of New York to re-establish the approaches to private lands along Route 9 in the Towns of Clifton Park and Halfmoon in the County of Saratoga in such a manner as not to destroy the access enjoyed by the property owners prior to the reconstruction of U. S. *1091Route 9. Respondent has moved to dismiss the petition as matter of law on various grounds.

What petitioners seek is the same access' they had to their properties before reconstruction of Route 9. Access has been reduced by the construction of ditches and gutters in front of lands of petitioners. They claim that under section 54-a of the Highway Law they are entitled upon their demand to the precise re-establishment of access as existing prior to reconstruction. By its very terms said statute does not create a mandatory duty of the re-establishment of the *status quo.*Nor does logic point to the existence of such a mandatory duty. Access must be collated by the Superintendent with the construction of ditches for drainage purposes, the improvement of sight conditions and the removal of other hazards to the traveling public.

There is no such showing under the petition herein of a violation of duty entitling petitioners to the mandamus relief sought. The petition accordingly is dismissed.

In view of the foregoing determination it has not been deemed necessary to pass on the question of whether petitioner J. Gilbert Maurer lacked legal capacity to institute this proceeding except in his own individual behalf.

Submit order.
JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

(Second Chamber)

18 June 2009

Case F-43/08

**David Spee**

**v**

**European Police Office (Europol)**

(Civil service – Europol staff – Vacant post – Selection procedure)

**Application:**brought under Article 40(3) of the Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of
a European Police Office (Europol Convention), and Article 93(1) of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees,
in which Mr Spee seeks annulment of the decision of the Director of Europol of 7 January 2008 rejecting his complaint and
of the underlying decisions of 20 June 2007 and 6 July 2007 concerning the re-opening of a selection procedure to fill a First
Officer’s post declared vacant on 25 July 2006.

**Held:**The action is dismissed. The applicant is ordered to pay all the costs.

**Summary**

*Officials – Europol staff – Recruitment – Candidate chosen by the selection committee not satisfying the criteria set out
in the notice of vacancy*

Although the Director of the European Police Office (Europol) does not have the power, under the principle of the independence
of selection boards in competitions, to annul or amend a decision of a selection board, he is, however, required to eliminate
any candidate who does not satisfy the criteria set out in the notice of vacancy, since the administration is bound by each
of the criteria it has laid down in that notice. The Director cannot therefore be bound by decisions of the selection board
the unlawfulness of which would be liable as a consequence to vitiate his own decisions. Consequently, the Director may decide,
having been apprised that a selected candidate did not satisfy the requirements in a notice of vacancy, to initiate a fresh
selection procedure.

(see paras 45, 46, 48)

See:

142/85 *Schwiering* v *Court of Auditors* [1986] ECR 3177, paras 19 to 21; 322/85 and 323/85 *Hoyer and Neumann* v *Court of Auditors* [1986] ECR 3215, paras 12 to 14; C-35/92 P *Parliament* v *Frederiksen* [1993] ECR I‐991, paras 15 and 16

T-153/95 *Kaps* v *Court of Justice* [1996] ECR-SC I‐A‐233 and II‐663, para. 78; T-143/98 *Cendrowicz* v *Commission* [1999] ECR‐SC I‐A‐273 and II‐1341, para. 39; T-45/04 *Tzirani* v *Commission* [2006] ECR-SC I‐A‐2‐145 and II‐A‐2‐681, para. 46
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4301 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, as the ‘‘J. Elliott 

Williams Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2017 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. DUNCAN of 

South Carolina, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. CLYBURN, and Mr. GOWDY) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘J. Elliott Williams Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. J. ELLIOTT WILLIAMS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort 

6 Mill, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘J. Elliott Williams Post Office Building’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4301 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J. Elliott Williams 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Robert Dawl BEAVERS, Petitioner, v. Robert RAINS, Acting Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. A-12738.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 6, 1959.

Robert Dawl Beavers, petitioner, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Dawl Beavers has filed in this court a petition for writ of habeas corpus, seeking his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary at McAlester, where he was received on December 8, 1954 by reason of a judgment and sentence made and entered on April 6, 1954 in the district court of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, in case No. 5272, wherein petitioner was charged with the crime of murder, was *791tried in said cause before a jury, found guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and sentenced by the court to a term of eighteen years in the penitentiary.

Petitioner appealed from said conviction to this court; and although his attorney overlooked filing the record in the trial court prior to filing in this court, and the appeal was subject to dismissal, nevertheless this court carefully studied the trial record and decided the case upon the merits thereof. Consideration was given to alleged errors set out in the petition in error. See Beavers v. State, Okl.Cr., 282 P.2d 783.

All matters now set up in petition for writ of habeas corpus were either set up in the appeal, or to have been considered should have been. This court has uniformly held that where trial court had jurisdiction, errors in its proceedings can only be reviewed upon appeal. Ex parte Mingle, 2 Okl.Cr. 708, 104 P. 68; Ex parte Woods, 7 Okl.Cr. 645, 125 P. 440. We may not in the within case consider the sufficiency of the petition in the court where the conviction was had, or the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. In re Sullivan, 82 Okl.Cr. 364, 170 P.2d 260. Consideration has already been given to such matters. Beavers v. State, supra.

As was said in Ex parte McDaniel, 53 Okl.Cr. 435, 18 P.2d 287, a defendant imprisoned under judgment of conviction cannot secure discharge by habeas corpus unless court was without jurisdiction, and its judgment was void, however numerous and gross the errors may have been at the trial.

Habeas corpus cannot be resorted to as a substitute for appeal. Ex parte Holder, 94 Okl.Cr. 270, 234 P.2d 958; Ex parte Washington, 92 Okl.Cr. 337, 223 P.2d 552. And particularly so where appeal has been had. The facts of the killing for which conviction had, as disclosed by the trial record, are set out in Beavers v. State, supra.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dresser as of the dates and for periods
presented as required by such Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 12, 2004



/s/ Steven G.
Lamb

Steven G. Lamb

Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., filed on March 23, 1995, of our report
dated February 5, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets for NB&T
Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,
2001.


                                                    /s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
                                                    Certified Public Accountants
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 18, 2003

                                       71
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 2:01 PM

To: 'info@terraimaging.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion - Terra Imaging LLC (FAA-2015-0412)

Dear Mr. Karl Engstrom:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0412). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

‐ set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 5/20/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5640]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1005
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Womack) at 10 o'clock and 5 minutes a.m.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q (the "Report") of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chua Leong Hin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Chua Leong Hin


Chief Financial Officer


November 15, 2010
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1461]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             RECOGNIZING THE POTENTIAL OF COMMUNITY LENDING

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. ROBERT E. ANDREWS

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize some recent 
innovations in private lending to graduate and undergraduate students 
in U.S. colleges and universities. I also want to encourage our 
nation's wealthy individuals to think about participating in these 
programs as one way to give back to our communities. Since its 
inception in 2011, the Social Financial company, or SoFi, has offered 
compelling community-based lending and consolidation programs, and this 
academic year will assist students from 45 colleges and universities 
across the country.
  At its core, SoFi demonstrates the powerful idea of community 
lending. It brings alumni, students, and schools together to ensure 
students' debt burdens are manageable. For the upcoming 2012-13 
academic year, SoFi used its equity base and additional capital from 
alumni to secure $80 million to finance, fund, and support new student 
loans. This innovative student loan solution benefits students, alumni, 
higher education institutions, and our nation. The funds from school-
specific lending pools allow students to enjoy comparatively low-
interest loan rates and opportunities to refinance previous loans. In 
addition, the alumni that contribute to the pool earn a significant and 
low-risk return, while schools gain access to low-cost funding.
  Mr. Speaker, although I do not expect private lending schemes to 
supplant available federal loan structures, I believe Social 
Financial's commitment to the betterment and transformation of the 
financial services landscape for students sets an example for how to 
innovate in this field. I commend SoFi for its hard work, community 
partnerships and innovation, and congratulate SoFi on its continuous 
expansion to schools across the U.S. In order to tackle student debt, 
we will need to be creative, in exactly the ways SoFi has been. I 
encourage those who have the means and desire to give back to follow 
Social Financial's example and invest in the education of the next 
generation.

                          ____________________
```
ADAMS RUN JOHNS ISLAND

RAVENEL

WADMALAW

HOLLYWOOD

CHARLESTON

USDA APHIS

2150 Centre Ave

Fort Collins, Co 80526

Data Source:

USDA APHIS PPQ

ESRI Basemap

These data, and all the information contained herein, have been collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Marketing

and Regulatory Programs Business Services’ (MRPBS) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and/or Agriculture

Marketing Service (AMS), or by its cooperators on APHIS’ and/or AMS’ behalf, for restricted government purposes only. This

information is the sole property of MRPBS. See full disclaimer at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/banner/help/disclaimers/

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE (ALB) ERADICATION PROGRAM

ALB South Carolina Quarantine Boundary

ALB Federal Quarantine Boundary

Town Boundary

0 1 2

Miles

0 1 2

Kilometers

Date Created: [ 3/25/2024

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

ALB South Carolina Quarantine
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

● ●

★

●

● ●

●
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph C. Levesque, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Aetrium Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Aetrium Incorporated.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aetrium Incorporated and
will be retained by Aetrium Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



| | By: /s/ Joseph C. Levesque
Name: Joseph C. Levesque
Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Douglas L. Hemer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Aetrium Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Aetrium Incorporated.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aetrium Incorporated and
will be retained by Aetrium Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



| | By: /s/ Douglas L. Hemer
Name: Douglas L. Hemer
Title: Chief Administrative Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Paul H. Askegaard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Aetrium Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Aetrium Incorporated.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aetrium Incorporated and
will be retained by Aetrium Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



| | By: /s/ Paul H. Askegaard
Name: Paul H. Askegaard
Title: Treasurer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------