alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sr 4 ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

‘ X\IfZ REGION IX

L PRO1 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

## APR 092013 Mr. Norman W. Fichthorn REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Hunton and Williams, LLP 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 DearMr. Fichthom: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received thepetition you submitted on February 4, 2013 on behalfofSalt RiverProjectAgricultural Improvement and PowerDistrict (SRP), seeking reconsideration and a stay ofeffectiveness ofcertain elements ofEPA’ s final rule entitled “Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze State and Federal Implementation Plans” as it applies to the Coronado Generating Station (Coronado). 77 FR 72512 (December 5, 2012). As indicated in yourpetition, EPA proposed to set emissions limits fornitrogen oxides (NOx) of0.050 lb/MMBtu and 0.080 lb/MMBtu (based on arolling 30-boiler-operating-day average) for Coronado Units 1 and 2 respectively. 77 FR 42834, 42869 (July 20, 2012). In response to comments received during the public commentperiod, our final rule set a single plant-wide limit across the two Coronado units of0.065 lb/MMBtu. In addition, the final rule established a compliance determination method that ensures inclusion ofthirty boiler-operating days ofemissions data forboth units, even ifboth units are not operating. With respectto Coronado, we explainedthat, “during periods when only one unit operates, this method allows the one operating unit to average out short-term emission spikes by using the mostrecentthirty boiler-operating-day value from the non-operating unit.” 77 FR 72527. SRP’s petition seeks reconsideration ofthis element ofour final rule pursuant to Clean Air Action section 307(d)(7)(B). In response to yourpetition, EPA is granting reconsideration ofthe compliance methodology forNOx at Coronado. Accordingly, EPA plans to publish a notice ofproposedrulemaking seeking comment on an alternative compliance methodology forNOx at Coronado. In addition, because we initiallyproposed differentNOx emission limits for Coronado Units 1 and 2, we also intend to seek comment on the emission limits for each ofthose two units. At this time, EPA is not acting on any otherportion ofSRP’s petition, including SRP’s request for stay ofthe final rule. Ifyou have any questions regarding the reconsideration process, please contact Charlotte Withey at (415) 972-3915 or Lea Anderson at (202) 564-5571. We thank you for your continued interest in this rule and look forward to hearing from you during the reconsideration process.

cc: See next page Printed on Recycled Papercc: Eric Massey, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Joseph P. Mikitish, Arizona Attorney General’s Office Michael Hiatt, Earthjustice Arizona Congressional Delegation Kelly Barr, Kara Montalvo and Karilee Rarnaley, SRP
Mary Jane Rutkowski -MOE· <nl<lryJnn~'> rutkowsk• cz;m,uyland.gov> 

Strengthen the Baltimore Serious Ozone Nonattainment SIP 

Jul 17, 2013 

Mary Jane Rutkowski 

1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730 

Baltimore, MD 21230 

Dear Rutkowski, 

As a Maryland resident, I am deeply concerned about Maryland's 

continuing failure to address ozone air quahty issues in Baltimore. 

Sixteen years after EPA established its nationwide health-protective 

standard for ozone, the Baltimore area is stdl failing to meet th1s 

standard. What's even more concerning IS that EPA recently ti.ghtened 

its health-based standard for ozone, meaning that the Baltimore area is 

now even further from achieving safe levels of air quality. 

While the Maryland Healthy Air Act was an important step for cleaning 

up our air, as the Maryland Department of the Environment has 

recognized, the Act does not go far enough. In parttcular, additional 

emission reductions are needed from motor vehicles as well as from two 

of the state's largest sources of ozone-causing pollution: the Crane 

and Wagner coal plants. The coal plants still lack the most 

state-of-the-art emission controls for ozone-causing pollutants. 

To protect the health of our families and our future and of other 

members of the Baltimore community, I call on the Maryland Department 

of the Environment to address vehicular emissions and to establish 

health-protective emission limits for the Balbmore-area coal plants. 

Sincerely, 

Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:30 AM
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Margaret J. Maxwell, as Executrix of Charles J. Hattan, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

September 30, 1959.

*501
      *John E. Knetzer, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Thomas Russell Jones*for widow.

*John J. Minett, Jr.,*as special guardian for Charles J. Hattan, Jr., an infant.

*John J. Walsh,*as special guardian for Joan B. Hattan, an infant.

*William A. Anzalone*for Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn.

Maximilian Moss, S. In this accounting proceeding, the executrix seeks a construction of article “ Second ” of the will to determine whether a certain *“*Totten Trust ” referred to therein was revoked, and the validity of the election filed by the widow.

By article “ second ” the testator bequeathed to two named children all sums of money standing in his name in the Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, where he maintained a Totten Trust account for the benefit of one of the children named in the said article.

A tentative trust of a savings bank deposit may be revoked by the will of a depositor, and it is so revoked where a disposition is made of a bank deposit in favor of persons other than those named as *cestuis*of the account *(Matter of Totten,*179 N. Y. 112; *Meehan*v. *Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank,*213 App. Div. 807, affd. without opinion 241 N. Y. 564; *Matter of Beck,*260 App. Div. 651; *Matter of Sterling,*264 App. Div. 308, affd. 290 N. Y. 820). The said Totten Trust was effectively revoked and by virtue of said article became an estate asset. The Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn shall make payment to the petitioner of the amount due on the account referred to in the petition together with accrued interest upon presentation of the passbook.

Upon the exercise by the widow of her right of election she became entitled to her intestate share of the net estate outright to be computed as provided by section 18 (subd. 1, par. [a]) of the Decedent Estate Law. Each testamentary gift must abate pro rata to satisfy the widow’s elective share *(Matter of*
      *502
      *Taliento,*9 Misc 2d 167; *Blatter of Fagan,*84 N. Y. S. 2d 558) whether the legacies be general, specific or residuary *(Matter of Litt,*73 N. Y. S. 2d 368; *Matter of Topazio,*175 Misc. 132; *Matter of Barrows,*204 Misc. 339).

Settle decree on notice.
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Record Audit Inspections

CVB-SOP-5116 03

CVB-SOP-IC

06 May 2022

Process for Special Inspection - Bench Record Review done remotely

CVB-Released
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, Raghavan Rajaji, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge, Manugistics Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended February 28, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Manugistics Group, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: May 16, 2005 | By:    | /s/  Raghavan Rajaji                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Raghavan  Rajaji                                                                     |
|                     |   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Kto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofManugistics Group, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of the Annual Report on Form 10-K), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Manugistics Group, Inc. and will be retained by ManugisticsGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsStaff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1012

ELISABETH LENES; STEVEN LENES,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

LORAL LANGEMEIER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-00316-CWH)

Submitted: July 25, 2011 Decided: July 29, 2011

Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

G. Mark Phillips, William C. Wood, Jr., Erin R. Stuckey, NELSON, 

MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH. LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; 

J. Mitchell Little, SCHEEF & STONE, LLP, Frisco, Texas, for 

Appellant. Guy M. Burns, Jonathan S. Coleman, JOHNSON, POPE, 

BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP, Tampa, Florida; James C. Bradley, 

Nina H. Fields, RICHARDSON, PATRICK, WESTBROOK & BRICKMAN, LLC, 

Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Loral Langemeier appeals the district court’s order 

denying her motion to compel arbitration in the underlying 

diversity action. We have reviewed the record included on 

appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the 

district court’s ruling. Accordingly, we affirm. See Am. 

Recovery Corp. v. Computerized Thermal Imaging, 96 F.3d 88, 92

(4th Cir. 1996) (noting that “whether a party has agreed to 

arbitrate an issue is a matter of contract interpretation: ‘[A] 

party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute 

which he has not agreed so to submit.’”) (citations omitted). 

We deny the Appellees’ motion to file a sur-reply brief and to 

schedule oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# C_2013009EN.01003501.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2012 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-270/08) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction in financial assistance - Operational programme falling under Objective No 1 (1994-1999) for Berlin (East) (Germany))

2013/C 9/60

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma, T. Henze and C. Blaschke, acting as Agents, and C. von Donat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and B. Conte, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: J. Rodríguez Cárcamo and N. Díaz Abad and subsequently by: A. Rubio Gonzáles, abogados del Estado); Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, Y. de Vries, B. Koopman, M. Bulterman and J. Langer, acting as Agents); and French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and N. Rouam, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 1615 final of 29 April 2008 reducing the financial contribution under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) initially granted for the Operational Programme falling under Objective 1 (1994-1999) for Berlin (East) in the Federal Republic of Germany

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Brian Pate, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
#### In the Matter of John L. Segrett, Appellant, v Harold Adler, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered August 21, 1991, which denied the petition seeking to invalidate the respondent’s designating petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petitioner seeks to invalidate the designating petition of Harold Adler for the nomination by the Democratic Party of Judge of the Civil Court for the Sixth Municipal Court District. On August 6, 1991, the Board of Elections found the designating petition of Adler to have a total number of 4,045 signatures. Of the 1,500 valid signatures needed to qualify, 2,002 were found valid by the Board. However, 2,043 were declared invalid. The matter was referred to a Referee to hear and report with recommendations.

The Referee concluded that the number of irregularities in the Adler petition raised the inference that the petition was permeated with fraud and recommended invalidating the Adler petition as a whole.

*766The Supreme Court disaffirmed the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, insofar as the Referee recommended that the Adler designating petition be invalidated as permeated with fraud and insofar as it recommended that the signatures obtained by Tito Velez were valid. The court therefore denied the petition and sustained the validity of the Adler designating petition "with a minimum number of signatures of at least 1,708”.

Nothing in the sparse record presented to this court compels a conclusion contrary to that reached by the Supreme Court. It has not been demonstrated that the designating petitions were permeated with fraud. From that which appears in the Referee’s report regarding the signatures obtained by Tito Velez, were we to reach the point, we would find them valid.

Accordingly, the order of the Supreme Court is affirmed, the petition is denied and the validity of the Adler designating petition is sustained. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
# C_2008171EN.01004904.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/49

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2008 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Oftaltech (OFTASIL)

(Case T-30/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 171/97)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    Our audits included the financial statement schedule of Biocircuits
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
    We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-48296, No. 33-50642, No. 33-64066, No. 33-89006, No.
333-07447 and No. 333-21257) pertaining to the Employee's Stock Purchase Plan,
the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the Dual Stock Option Plan and
the Written Compensation Contract of Biocircuits Corporation and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-13673, No. 333-19797 and No.
333-26079) and the related Prospectuses of our report dated January 13, 1997
with respect to the financial statements of Biocircuits Corporation included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1996, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Biocircuits
Corporation.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
April 28, 1997
# COVID-19 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Appalachian Regional Commission Develops Free Resources and Tools to Help Regional Nonprofits Meet COVID Related Operational Challenges More than 100 Regional Nonprofits Receive Dedicated Coaching Through Innovative Cohort Model WASHINGTON, D.C., November 9, 2020—Today, ARC announced&#160;the Appalachia Nonprofit Resource Center&#160;(ANRC) is now offering expertly curated &#160;resources on financial management, sustainable operations, fundraising, and other tools free of charge. Although the resource directory is primarily responsive to the specific needs of Appalachian nonprofits [&#8230;]The post Appalachian Regional Commission Develops Free Resources and Tools to Help Regional Nonprofits Meet COVID Related Operational Challenges appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Announces $3.75 Million for Emergency Business Response Assistance Program to be Administered by Appalachian Community Capital WASHINGTON, D.C., May 11, 2020—Today, the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) announced a $3.75 million grant to&#160;Appalachian Community Capital (ACC)&#160;for the ARC-ACC Emergency Business Response Assistance Program to strengthen and stabilize the Region&#8217;s Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and other mission-driven development finance lenders serving small businesses impacted by COVID-19 related losses. Through this partnership, the [&#8230;]The post ARC Announces $3.75 Million for Emergency Business Response Assistance Program to be Administered by Appalachian Community Capital appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Invests in Medical Safety Gear Production in North Carolina WASHINGTON, D.C., April 16, 2020—Today, the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) announced an investment of $300,000 to The Industrial Commons, in Morganton, North Carolina, to purchase materials and coordinate staff to manufacture needed medical safety gear to fulfill product demand across the Appalachian Region and the nation. The Industrial Commons, and its enterprise the Carolina Textile [&#8230;]The post ARC Invests in Medical Safety Gear Production in North Carolina appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Provides New Resources Documenting COVID-19 Spread in Appalachia in Relation to Rest of Nation WASHINGTON, D.C., March 26, 2020—Today, the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) announced announced two new tools documenting the spread of COVID-19 at the regional and county levels. The first tool, the COVID-19 Cases in Appalachia map, displays the current number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Appalachia, and throughout the United States. Higher numbers of cases [&#8230;]The post ARC Provides New Resources Documenting COVID-19 Spread in Appalachia in Relation to Rest of Nation appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010011EN.01003901.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/39

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 October 2009 — Bactria and Gutknecht v Commission

(Case T-561/08) (1)

1

2010/C 11/74

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed in part from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4446 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4446

To amend the Virgin Islands of the United States Centennial Commission 
  Act to extend the expiration date of the Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Virgin Islands of the United States Centennial Commission 
  Act to extend the expiration date of the Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    The Virgin Islands of the United States Centennial Commission Act 
(Public Law 114-224) is amended--
            (1) in section 4, by adding at the end the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(i) Failure To Appoint.--If the Governor of the Virgin Islands of 
the United States or the designee of the Governor declines to make or 
does not make the appointment of a member by the deadline described 
under subsection (c), that member shall be appointed by the Delegate to 
the House of Representatives from the United States Virgin Islands.'';
            (2) in section 7(b), by striking ``January 31, 2018'' and 
        inserting ``January 31, 2019'';
            (3) in section 10, by striking ``September 30, 2018'' and 
        inserting ``September 30, 2019''; and
            (4) by striking section 11.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT31.3****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven L. Spinner, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form10-K of Performance Food Group Company; and 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report.Date:April 28, 2008         By:                                            /s/ Steven L. Spinner   Name:  Steven L. Spinner   President and Chief Executive Officer