alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4408 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to establish additional registration 

requirements for prescribers of opioids, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Mr. KATKO (for himself and Mr. SUOZZI) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to establish additional registration requirements for prescribers of 

opioids, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Opioid Addiction Pre5 vention Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4408 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESCRIBERS. 

2 Section 303 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

3 U.S.C. 823) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(k)(1) The Attorney General shall not register, or 

6 renew the registration of, a practitioner under subsection 

7 (f) who is licensed under State law to prescribe controlled 

8 substances in schedule II, III, or IV, unless the practi9 tioner submits to the Attorney General, for each such reg10 istration or renewal request, a certification that the practi11 tioner, during the applicable registration period, will not 

12 prescribe any schedule II, III, or IV opioid, other than 

13 an opioid prescription described in paragraph (3), for the 

14 initial treatment of acute pain in an amount in excess of 

15 the lesser of— 

16 ‘‘(A) a 7-day supply (for which no refill is avail17 able); or 

18 ‘‘(B) an opioid prescription limit established 

19 under State law. 

20 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘acute pain’— 

21 ‘‘(A) means pain with abrupt onset and caused 

22 by an injury or other process that is not ongoing; 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(B) does not include— 

25 ‘‘(i) chronic pain; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4408 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) pain being treated as part of cancer 

2 care; 

3 ‘‘(iii) hospice or other end-of-life care; or 

4 ‘‘(iv) pain being treated as part of pallia5 tive care. 

6 ‘‘(3) An opioid prescription described in this para7 graph is a prescription— 

8 ‘‘(A) for a schedule II, III, or IV opioid drug 

9 approved by the Food and Drug Administration for 

10 an indication for the treatment of addiction; and 

11 ‘‘(B) that is for the treatment of addiction.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# Training Program - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Federal Community Development Funding Join the WV Community Development Hub for our Federal Community Development Funding: Spring 2024 Training! This exciting, two-day in-person event will be on Wednesday, March 20, 2024, and Thursday, March 21, 2024, at the Bridgeport Conference Center. At this training, we will dive into the world of community development funding, exploring the latest strategies and opportunities available. Whether [&#8230;]The post Federal Community Development Funding appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Broadband Bootcamp Many local leaders across Appalachia have had significant broadband work added to their plates recently. If it feels like you have been asked to become a broadband expert overnight — we’re here to help. Understanding the vast array of broadband funding opportunities available, and knowing how to navigate the partnerships and strategies required to ensure [&#8230;]The post ARC Broadband Bootcamp appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Looking Forward: ARPA in Appalachia Gain valuable insight on how the American Rescue Plan Act State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) is poised to add jobs and attract additional investment in a multi-county area in TN. Learn about how a NC local development district is working with their communities to maximize the impact of the SLFRF. Finally, our policy [&#8230;]The post Looking Forward: ARPA in Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Implementation of Practices and Strategies to Support Students and Educators Join us for the second of three REL Appalachia webinars to learn how West Virginia educators and school leaders can support students experiencing trauma. Our experts will share concrete classroom and school-based practices to support students and educators in the context of trauma, including strategies to address implementation barriers. Participants will receive a certificate of [&#8230;]The post Implementation of Practices and Strategies to Support Students and Educators appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Addressing Trauma in Educational Settings Join us for the first of three REL Appalachia webinars to learn how educators and school leaders can support students experiencing trauma. Our experts will help you increase your knowledge and understanding of the impacts and symptoms of trauma, share relevant strategies to support students who exhibit these symptoms, and provide you with resources educators [&#8230;]The post Addressing Trauma in Educational Settings appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# Hall - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Georgia Mountains Regional Commission Executive Director Heather Feldman Email &#104;&#x66;e&#108;&#x64;m&#97;&#x6e;&#64;&#x67;&#x6d;&#114;&#x63;&#46;&#103;&#x61;&#46;&#103;&#x6f;vThe post Georgia Mountains Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Linesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  April 06, 2010


/s/ James Linesch


James Linesch


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)














A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008247EN.01002501.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/25

---

Action brought on 24 July 2008 — Sevenier v Commission

(Case F-62/08)

(2008/C 247/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roberto Sevenier (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission's decision rejecting the applicant's request, first, to withdraw his tender of resignation and, second, for his case to be submitted to the medical committee and, consequently, an application for reinstatement of the applicant at the European Commission with reconstitution of his career from the date of his tender of resignation.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission decision of 24 September 2007 inasmuch as it rejects the applicant's request, first, to withdraw his tender of resignation of 19 October 1983 and, second, for his case to be submitted to the medical committee; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission decision of 24 September 2007 inasmuch as it rejects the applicant's request, first, to withdraw his tender of resignation of 19 October 1983 and, second, for his case to be submitted to the medical committee;

| — | Consequently, reinstate the applicant at the European Commission with reconstitution of his career from 19 October 1983; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, reinstate the applicant at the European Commission with reconstitution of his career from 19 October 1983;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6065]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          NOTICES OF HEARINGS

               COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

  Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, I would like to announce for the 
information of the Senate an the public that a hearing has been 
scheduled before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 
The hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 12, 2012, at 9:30 
a.m., in room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building in 
Washington, DC.
  The purpose of the hearing is to receive testimony on S. 3469, the 
Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2012.
  Because of the limited time available for the hearing, witnesses may 
testify by invitation only. However, those wishing to submit written 
testimony for the hearing record should send it to the Committee on 
Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Washington, DC 
20510-6150, or by email to Abigail_Campbell@energy.senate.gov.
  For further information, please contact Sam Fowler at (202) 224-7571 
or Abigail Campbell at (202) 224-4905.

                      COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS

  Mr. AKAKA. Mr. President, I would like to announce that the Committee 
on Indian Affairs will meet during the session of the Senate on 
September 13, 2012, in room SD-628 of the Dirksen Senate Office 
Building, at 2:15 p.m., to conduct a business meeting to consider S. 
675, the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2011; S. 
1345, the Spokane Tribe of Indians of the Spokane Reservation Grand 
Coulee Dam Equitable Compensation Settlement Act; and S. 1684, the 
Indian Tribal Energy Development and Self-Determination Act Amendments 
of 2011 to be followed immediately to conduct a hearing entitled 
``Addressing the Costly Administrative Burdens and Negative Impacts of 
the Carcieri and Patchak Decisions''.
  Those wishing additional information may contact the Indian Affairs 
Committee (202) 224-2251.

                      COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS

  Mr. AKAKA. Mr. President, I would like to announce that the Committee 
on Indian Affairs will meet during the session of the Senate on 
September 14, 2012, in room SD-628 of the Dirksen Senate Office 
Building, at 2:30 p.m., to conduct a hearing on the President's 
Nomination of Kevin K. Washburn to be Assistant Secretary-Indian 
Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior''.
  Those wishing additional information may contact the Indian Affairs 
Committee at (202) 224-2251.

                          ____________________
```
#### BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA COUNTY, Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant in Error.

No. 38292.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 14, 1959.

*553Robert D. Simms, County Atty., Donald D. Cameron, Asst. County Atty., Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

David H. Sanders, Bert McElroy, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

IRWIN, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, from a judgment *in its*favor for an amount less than prayed for. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, also perfected its appeal from said judgment in cause numbered 38,341, styled, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Okl.Sup., 342 P.2d 547.

Although there were two appeals from ¡the same judgment there is only one judgment for review before this Court. This case is identical as to issues and questions of law to cause numbered 38,341, supra, and our opinion in that case, promulgated on July 14, 1959; is dispositive of thp instant case. Therefore, said opinion and syllabus therein are approved and adopted as the syllabus and opinion herein, and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, BLACKBIRD and BERRY, J.J., concur.
#### In the Matter of Anne A. Sans, Now Known as Anne A. Garner, Petitioner, v Vincent E. Doyle, Jr., Respondent.

—Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks the review of the March 2, 1990 and February 8, 1991 orders of Supreme Court, Erie County, that respectively denied petitioner’s recusal motion and settled the record on which the order *671was based. Because those orders are subject to appeal, an article 78 proceeding is not the appropriate method to seek their review and the petition is therefore dismissed (see, *Matter of Venture Mag. v White,*103 AD2d 450, 451). (Original Article 78 Proceeding.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Opinion issued September 2 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 15 - 00576 - CR NO. 01 - 15 - 00577 - CR

——————————— BELANDA FAYE PRUITT , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e On Appeal from the Co unty C our t at Law No . 1 and Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No s . 209426 & 209428

MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 19 , 2015, appellant, Belanda Faye Pruitt, filed motion s to dismiss these appeal s . The motion s to dismiss comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and no prior decision has issued in the s e case s . See T EX . R. A PP .2

P. 42.2(a), (b). Accordingly, we grant the motion s and dismiss the appeal s . We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel con sists of Justice s Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd

. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2( b ).
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iPayment, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I Clay M. Whitson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (c)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

      (d)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of August 4, 2005.

                     /s/  CLAY M. WHITSON
                     -------------------------------
                     CLAY M. WHITSON
                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                  Page 26 of 26
Letter, dated March 28, 2005, from Warburg Pincus Equity Partners, L.P.



 EXHIBIT 10.51 
  
 March 28, 2005 
  
 Mr. Thomas C. Wilder 
 President, CEO, and
Acting CFO 
 Micro Therapeutics, Inc. 
 2 Goodyear 
 Irvine, CA 92618 
  
 Dear Mr. Wilder: 
  
 In connection with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s (“PWC”) audit of the consolidated financial statements of Micro Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2004
and for the year then ended, we recognize that obtaining representations from us concerning the information contained in this letter is a significant procedure in enabling PWC to form an opinion on whether the consolidated financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and, accordingly, we make the following representations, which are
true to the best of our knowledge and belief. 
  
 We recognize
your responsibility to evaluate the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with Statement of Auditing Standards No. 59. As the primary investor in the Company, we are committed to its long-term success. As such, we
remain committed to assisting the Company in meeting its cash flow requirements. Warburg, Pincus Equity Partners, L.P. (“WPEP”) is prepared to provide up to $5 million through July 4, 2006, less any amounts available to the Company under
any credit facility put in place from the date hereof and/or any amounts raised in a third party financing the Company completes, to fund the Company’s operations. Terms of such additional funding will be negotiated on terms mutually agreeable
to WPEP and the Company, and will be subject to the terms of the Corporate Opportunity Agreement in place between WPEP and ev3, Inc. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
  
  
  
 /s/ Elizabeth H. Weatherman 
 Elizabeth H. Weatherman 
 Managing Director 
  

	 cc:
	 Eric Parnes, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, LLP 


 Hal Hurwitz, Micro Therapeutics, Inc. 
 Thomas E. Timbie, ev3, Inc.
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Mary Duberstein, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

July 17, 1959.

*Raphael Persky*for petitioner.

*Halperin, Natanson, Shurtz, Scholer & Steingut*for respondents.

Maximilian Moss, S.

This is a petition by a grandchild of the testatrix, seeking a determination as to the validity and effect of article “ *V*” of the will and her right to take a share “ per stirpes ” thereunder.

The testatrix died on November 27, 1957, leaving a will dated July 2, 1952, which was granted probate on January 17, 1958. The petitioner’s waiver and consent to the probate of the will is filed herein.

The testatrix was the mother of eight children, three of whom predeceased her prior to the will’s execution. The petitioner is the issue of one of the testatrix’ three predeceased children. By the provisions of said article, a construction of which is sought, the testatrix’ residuary estate is devised and bequeathed equally ‘ ‘ to whomever of my children Bertha Levy, Deborah Williams, Celia Shorin, Gerald J. Dubey and Julius Duberstein, shall survive me ’ ’. This disposition of the residuary thereafter provides a substitutionary disposition to the issue of any of them who did not survive. Each of the residuary legatees *36named in the said article survived the testatrix and is now living.

The clause makes equal gifts to named persons and is not a class gift *(Matter of Soy,*143 Misc. 217; *Matter of Koorbusch,*199 Misc. 861). The beneficiaries of the residuary estate are limited to those persons named therein, each of whom survived the testatrix, and the provisions of section 29 of the Decedent Estate Law are inapplicable thereto *(Pimel*v. *Betjemann,*183 N. Y. 194; *Matter of Neydorff,*193 App. Div. 531; *Matter of Northrip,*258 App. Div. 71). The court has considered the will in its entirety and can find no evidence of intention other than as so clearly expressed *(Matter of Fabbri,*2 N Y 2d 236; *Spencer*v. *Childs,*1 N Y 2d 103). In the light of the instrument as a whole the said article *“ V ”*is construed as devising and bequeathing the entire residuary estate equally to the five legatees named therein, and that the petitioner acquired no interest in the residuary estate.

Settle decree on notice construing said article accordingly.
#### In the Matter of Sunja S. Angel Guardian Home et al., Respondents; Sonia S., Appellant.

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the parental rights of the mother, the mother appeals from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Esquirol, J.), dated July 6, 1990, as, after a hearing, granted the petition on the ground, *inter alia,*that the mother is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for the child by reason of mental illness, as defined by Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (c), and committed the guardianship and custody of the child to the petitioner Angel Guardian Home for the purpose of consenting to her adoption.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contentions, we find that there was clear and convincing evidence *(see, Matter of Joyce T.,*65 NY2d 39) to support the conclusion that she is, by reason of mental illness, presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for her infant *(see, Matter of Denise Emily K.,*154 AD2d 596; *Matter of Camille M.,*143 AD2d 755; *Matter of Baby Boy T.,*105 AD2d 750). Based upon his review of the mother’s medical records, which included a history of frequently-repeated hospitalizations for psychotic episodes within a six-year period, and his interview of the mother, the court-appointed psychiatrist diagnosed the mother as suffering from chronic paranoid schizophrenia. In his opinion, the mother’s mental condition was such that if the child were returned to her, the child would be in danger of becoming a neglected child or even possibly an abused child.

Accordingly, the Family Court’s order was proper *(see, Matter of Sharon P.I.,*153 AD2d 942; *Matter of Donald B.,*151 AD2d 477; *Matter of S. Children,*148 AD2d 728; *Matter of Sean S.S.,*143 AD2d 836). Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EPA Meeting with Petroleum Marketers Association of America (PMAA)

November 13, 2012

EPA OUST staff met with representative of PMAA to discuss their comments on the proposed 

changes to the UST regulations. Discussion included interstitial integrity testing of older 

systems, cost estimates of proposed changes to UST regs, and work done by contractors.

Attendees:

EPA – Liz McDermott, Paul Miller, Linda Gerber, Tim Roberts, Mark Barolo

PMAA –

Wes Loflin, Northeast Louisiana Oil and Gas Co. Inc.

Bruce Garrett, Volta Oil Company, Inc

Matt Bjornson, Bjornson Oil Company

Davis Cosey, Davis Oil Company

Scott B. Fisher, Texas Food & Fuel Association

Mark S. Morgan, Petroleum Marketers Association of America

Rob Underwood, Petroleum Marketers Association of America
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5711]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. SCHOCK:
       H.R. 6352.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The constitutional authority on which this bill rests is 
     the power of Congress as stated in Article I, Section 8, 
     Clause 1 of the United States Constitution.
```
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF EXPERT



I consent to the reference to me under the headings
“Item 3.A Selected Financial Data–Risks Relating To Our Business–Our Reserve Estimates Could Be Subject
To Significant Changes,” “Item 4.D Property, Plant and Equipment–Caliche: Facilities and Reserves”
and “Item 19. Exhibits” in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:



|May
    18, 2015 |  | /s/ Marta Aguilera                              
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | Marta Aguilera                                  
|                 |  | Manager of Geology and Mining Development of SQM