UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT RICHARD L. BAST, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
INTER-WORLD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiffs,

v. VICTOR MICHAEL GLASBERG; JEANNE GOLDBERG; COHEN, DUNN & SINCLAIR, PC; J. FREDERICK SINCLAIR; THOMAS J. No. 97-1185 CURCIO; ANTONIA LEIGH PETTIT; CARTER & KRAMER, PC; CHARLES WARREN KRAMER; JACOBOVITZ, ENGLISH & SMITH, PC; DAVID SMITH; BARBARA OZELLA REVES; CLAUDE DAVID CONVISSER; WILLIAM G. BILLINGHAM; NANCY GERTNER; PATRICIA GRIEST; JODY L. NEWMAN; JOHN F. DAVIS; MARY AUDREY LARKIN; LOIS AMES; DELMAR D. HARTLEY; ANTHONY JOSEPH PETTIT; ANNE CONNELL; WILLIAM C. HILLMAN; ROGER A. COX, Defendants-Appellees,STEPHEN A. ARMSTRONG, Party in Interest-Appellee, and MADDONA LEA SCHAMP PETTIT, removed to Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-531-A) Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: November 18, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELRichard L. Bast, Appellant Pro Se. Victor Michael Glasberg, VICTOR M. GLASBERG & ASSOCIATES, Alexandria, Virginia; FrankWillard Dunham, Jr., COHEN, GETTINGS, DUNHAM & HARRISON, Arlington, Virginia; Barbara Ozella Reves, Alexandria, Virginia; John Otto Easton, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Fairfax,Virginia; Patricia Griest, Beavercreek, Ohio; Pamela Anne Bresnahan, Steven Robert Becker, VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Washington, D.C.; Stephen A. Armstrong, ARMSTRONG &CARON, Fairfax, Virginia; Gottlieb James Frick, II, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
2Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Richard L. Bast appeals from the district court's orders denying his motions to recuse and for reconsideration of his motion to recuse. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying either Bast's motion for recusal, see United States v. Mitchell , 886 F.2d 667, 671 (4th Cir. 1989), or his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for recusal. See Collision v. International Chem. Workers Union , 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders.Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and for sanctions. We find that Bast's appeal is frivolous, as it is without factual or legal support. Plus, it is the latest of several of Bast's frivolousappeals, and is merely a continuation of Bast's abuse of the legal process. We deny Appellees' motion to dismiss, but grant Appellees' motion for Fed. R. App. P. 38 sanctions and remand to the district court for a determination of costs and attorneys' fees. See In re Vincent , 105 F.3d 943, 944 (4th Cir. 1997). We deny as moot Appellees' motion for ruling on pending motion to dismiss and for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED
3