alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1042 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1042

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
    Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and North Atlantic planning areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2015

  Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker, Mr. Sanders, Ms. 
 Mikulski, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. Warren, Mr. Blumenthal, and 
   Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
    Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and North Atlantic planning areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Ocean and Safe Tourism Anti-
Drilling Act'' or the ``COAST Anti-Drilling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease or any other authorization for the exploration, development, or 
production of oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area;
            ``(2) the South Atlantic planning area; or
            ``(3) the North Atlantic planning area.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: March 15, 2007 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE      
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|                      | Todd E. Wille          
|                      | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
<PAGE>

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                FUTURE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.


     Bruce LaMont and David Weitz certify as follows:

     1.   That they are the President and Secretary, respectively, of FUTURE
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada Corporation.

     2.   That by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors September 20,
1996, the following resolution was adopted.

          "RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation dated
          September 28, 1989 and filed with the Secretary of
          State on September 28, 1989 and the Amendment to the
          Articles of Incorporation dated April 15, 1990 and
          filed with the Secretary of State on May 8, 1990
          be, and hereby are amended as follows:

           That the name of the corporation is Covalent Group, Inc."

     3.   That paragraph FIRST of said Articles of Incorporation is hereby
amended to read as follows:

          The name of the corporation is Covalent Group, Inc.

     4.   That the members of said corporation have adopted said amendment by
written consent on or about the 20th day of September, 1996.  That the wording
of the amended Articles, as set forth in the members' resolution, is the same as
that set forth in the Director's resolution in paragraph Two (2) above.  That
the number of shares voted affirmative for the adoption of said resolution is 7,
948, 824, and that the total number of shares entitled to vote on or consent to
said amendment is 11,542,403.

          DATED this 20th day of September, 1996.

                              SIGNED: /s/ BRUCE LAMONT
                                      ----------------------------
                                         BRUCE LAMONT, President


                              SIGNED: /s/ DAVID WEITZ
                                      ----------------------------
                                         DAVID WEITZ, Secretary
<PAGE>

STATE OF NEW JERSEY      :
                         : SS.
COUNTY OF CAMDEN         :


          ON THIS 20th day of September, 1996, personally appeared before me, a
Notary Public, Bruce LaMont and David Weitz, who acknowledged that they are the
President and Secretary respectively of Future Medical Technologies
International, Inc., and that they executed the foregoing Certificate of
Amendment.


                              /s/ Claire S. Beaverson
                              -------------------------------
                              NOTARY PUBLIC
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Municipal Securities  Purchase,  Inc.
(the  "registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),
we, LeAnn Rogers and Kathleen Gan,  Chairman and Vice  President and  Treasurer,
respectively,  of the registrant,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
that to our knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      registrant.

July 29, 2005

/s/ LeAnn Rogers
----------------
LeAnn Rogers
Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Kathleen Gan
----------------
Kathleen Gan
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2019423EN.01005301.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/53

---

Order of the General Court of 10 October 2019 — Aeris Invest v SRB

(Case T-599/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - No ex-post definitive valuation of Banco Popular Español - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 423/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Aeris Invest Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset, P. Medina Sánchez and A. Sellés Marco, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: A. Valavanidou, I. Georgiopoulos and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and B. Meyring, S. Schelo, F. Málaga Diéguez, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch, M. Bettermann, S. Ianc and M. Rickert, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the ‘decision of the SRB, notified to the applicant by letter of 14 September 2018, not to carry out an ex-post definitive valuation of Banco Popular Español, SA’.

Operative part of the order

The Court orders:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Aeris Invest Sàrl shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Aeris Invest Sàrl shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
# C_2020077EN.01006201.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/62

---

Order of the General Court of 15 January 2020 — Avio v Commission

(Case T-139/18) (1)

(2020/C 77/84)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2009 – Commission v Slovenia**

**(Case C‐402/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2004/35/EC – Environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 11)*

2.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification
– Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 12)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 56). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insurance Auto
Auctions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 26, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott P. Pettit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  May 10, 2006
       ------------

                                        /s/ Scott P. Pettit
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Scott P. Pettit, Chief Financial Officer


          This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6766
ROBERT E. BUTLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus TRACY S. RAY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00077-JRS) Submitted: August 7, 2006 Decided: September 1, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Edward Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.3


 

 





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment, dated
as of December 31, 2016 (the “Amendment”), to Employment Agreement dated as of April 9, 2015 and effective as of April
1, 2010, as amended to date (collectively, the “Agreement”), is by and between WidePoint Corporation (the “Company”)
and Jin Kang (“Employee”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such
terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound do hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Effective as of
December 31, 2016, Section 1 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the term of Employee employment under the Agreement shall
be extended to December 31, 2017.


 


2. Except as expressly
provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement remain unaltered and are in full force
and effect and are expressly hereby ratified and confirmed. The Agreement and this Amendment shall be read and construed as one
agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	WIDEPOINT CORPORATION	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Steve L. Komar	 	 	/s/ Jin Kang	 
	Name:	Steve L. Komar	 	 	Jin Kang	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	Individually	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness:	/s/ James McCubbin	 	Witness:	/s/ James McCubbin
Refund Request Worksheet 

EmailZRUNVKHHWWR: SSTH[SRUWVHUYLFHV@usda.gov

Accounting code: 0XPQPQ0024PQPSCRTPUBLICUSDA/0203 Date: 

Note: Please attach any documentation that supports the refund 

Company Information 

Company or individual name: 

PCIT Org ID number: Phone number: 

Contact person: Contact email: 

Address: 

Reason for refund: 



Payment type used to fund PCIT 

(Fully complete the appropriate payment type below. Worksheets with missing information will be returned) 

1. Physical check * Available only when ACH or credit card refunds are possible. A current IRS Form-W9

1 must be submitted with the refund request.

Financial institution name:

Financial institution routing number (RTN):

Tax Identification Number (TIN):

Depositor account title:

Depositor account number:

Refund amount:

Accounting code: 0XPQPQ0024PQPSCRTPUBLICUSDA/0203

Check number:

2. Electronic check (ACH) * A current IRS Form-W91 must be submitted with the refund request.

Financial institution name:

Financial institution routing number (RTN):

Tax Identification Number (TIN):

Depositor account title:

Depositor account number:

Refund amount:

Pay.gov Tracking ID:

3. Credit card †

Name on card:

Amount of original charges: Amount of refund: 

Agency tracking ID: Pay.gov tracking ID: 

Transaction date:

* Allow 4-6 weeks for processing, † Allow 3-5 business days for processing

Privacy Act Statement: Collection of this information is authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3332(g), 3325(d), and 7701(c). The

information will be used by the Government to make payments by electronic funds to a vendor. This information may

also be used for income reporting and for collecting and reporting any delinquent amounts arising out of a vendor’s

relationship with the Government. Disclosure of the information by the vendor is mandatory. Failure to provide the

requested information may result in the delay or withholding of payments to the vendor.

1An IRS-Form W9 with instructions may be found on the IRS.gov website or https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Performance Food Group Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C. Michael Gray, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1 | ) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2 | ) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|By: | /s/ C. Michael Gray                  
|--- | -------------------------------------
|    | C. Michael Gray                      
|    | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    | March 17, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 14, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 146 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-122, CP2024-128.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28061 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2019112EN.01002201.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/22

---

Appeal brought on 12 December 2018 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-313/17, Wajos GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-783/18 P)

(2019/C 112/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | order Wajos GmbH to pay the costs incurred by EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Wajos GmbH to pay the costs incurred by EUIPO.

Pleas in law and main arguments

EUIPO submits that the judgment under appeal infringes Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. (1) The Court applied an incorrect test in the assessment of the distinctiveness of the mark at issue, did not examine the relevant criteria and relied on incorrect assessment criteria.

The judgment under appeal also infringes Article 36 and the first paragraph of Article 53 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, since it allows neither the appellant nor the Court of Justice to understand the grounds on which the General Court came to conclusion — which was decisive as regards the operative part of the judgment — that the form of the mark at issue had ‘an exceptional nature, in view of the customs of the sector’.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 13, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
127895 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. TORIBIO FLORES, Persona l Representative of Stephen J. Markman, the Estate of Jose A. Flores-Toscano, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 127895 COA: 250042 Monroe CC: 01-013043-NO E.C. KORNEFFEL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 16, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY
, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

t1006 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 13, 2005

Clerk