< DC U i 

# I t IL, lU

H U I E C X O . I L i U o OQ J o E c c2 o (

D f Q Z < C

M M l
_ J
_ . < T u i S ' £ Ko •• o E < > " X 3 ( £ Z O o o o Z U L X X < ^ o a. 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 

## r N

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRAXIOM

WASHINGTON , D C RDM , LLC , Complainant , V
. TE D STEVEN S ANCHORAG E INTERNATIONA L AIRPORT ,

Respondent
. 

## (5 E ll ¥

## E JA K

### n 2( M )RT/ENVIRDN f 

## n

AIRPORT/ENVIRONMENTA L LAW , AGC-60 0

Docke t No . 16-09-1 4 NOTIC E O FERRAT A Alask aDOT&P Fhereb y correct s asubstantiv e typograpica l omissio n fro mpag e 1 0 o f

it s Rebutta l date dDecembe r 29 , 2009. ' Tha t

pag e shoul dhav e include dth e wor d"not " a s inserte db y han do n th e attache dcop y o f tha t page . DATE D thi s 5**

^ day o f January , 201 0 at

Anchorage , Alaska
. DANIE LS . SULLIVA N ATTORNE Y GENERA L By : 

# ^fC^/pfiiz ^ Pbh n L . Steine r Senio r Assistan t Attorne y General AB A No . 871110 8

•••-'C" J



## g

* Althoug h counse l apologize s for anumbe r

o f othe r typographica l errors , non e othe r

appear s s o substantiv e a s t o requir e formal correction
. Notic e o f Errat a RDM.LLCv.AN C Pag e 1 of2 Docke t No . 16-09-1 4s

C M t S 5 S i n 11 1
u . u

> - I U a . u . I U o
o < !i ! - o

> O C 3 C O < o C O Z < C 4 I U
_ J ,- ^ < " s i ^ p o 5 * * S < X u ^ £ H < 5 • • o o c< f X 3 E Z O o o o Z L L X X < ^ O Q
. 9 z , - < 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 Certificat e O f Servic e I hereb y certif

y tha t o n January 5 , 2010 , I hav e thi s da y serve dth e foregoin g NOTIC E O FERRAT A o n th e followin g person s at th e followin g addresses : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Attn. : FA A Par t

1 6 Airpor t

Proceeding s Docket , AGC-61 0 Roo m92 5 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Shau n Debenha m Managin g Member s o f

RDM , LL C 296 0 C Street , Suit e 20 2 Anchorage , A K

9950 3
via : D han ddelivery n faxe d @ maile d 

### "^U^oL/jdc^ JohirL
. Steine r Senio r Assistan t Attorne y Genera l Attorne y General' s Offic e Attorney s for

Te dSteven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t

Notic e o f Errat a BDM , LL C V

. Al^ C Pag e 2 of 2 Docke t No . 16-09-1 4< c c I U
fi t o H I U o 5E ° B C I - O a , u . z lU O < u S C M t « m 3 S S C O ; ° ^ < i n ^ , ^ <<> 3 C O < o Z< C M I U - I £ ^ ^ u j S E a . . E < I U o t c z o o o U L X X 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 

# r s (Septembe r

18 , 2009 ) (Fina l Decisio n an dOrder , p . 28) . RD M ha s faile dt o satisf y it s burde n o f proo f tha t AGLA D wa s similarl y situate dwithCargoPort . Indeed , RD M canno t satisf y tha t burde n becaus e th e distinguishing factor s ar e to o man y an dto o distinct
. E . RD M ha s no t

carrie dit s burde n o f

proo f tha t th e term s an dtreatmen t AGLA D receive dfro mth e Alask aDOT&P Fwer e no t reasonabl y justified , whic h the y were . In th e first

seve n page s o f

it s Answer , Alask aDOT&P Fexplaine dwh y i t negotiate dfinancing deadlines—^t o whic hAGLA D di dno t objec t an dindicate di t

woul d meet—int o th e AGLA D lease
. I n th e fal l o f 2005 , AGLA D ha dno t

demonstrate dtha t

it ha dth e financial ability t o carry ou t it s project , [ANC-AGLAD-0157 ] unlike CargoPort , whic h ha dbee n require dt o pos t a$1 0 millio n bon do r

guarantee . (Bon drequiremen t fo r 100 % o f costs , ADA-30816 , Articl e I X [ANC-CargoPort-0014] ; Statemen t o f $1 0 millio n minimu mamount , ADA-30816 , Articl e X. D [ANC-CargoPort-0016] , lette r acknowledgin g receip t

[ANC-CargoPort-0111] . Unde r stat e regulations , at

1 7 AA C 42.215(b)(5 ) an d42.240(b) , AN C staf f wa s require dt o addres s financial responsibility o f AGLA D t o ensur e timel y 0>0 t completio n o f

improvements
. AGLAD , didfdisclos e whateve r financial backin g RD M ha dcommitte dt o th e project
. Alask aDOT&P Fha dth e optio n o f denyin g th e leas e fo

r failure t o demonstrat e financial responsibilit y sufficient t o carry ou t

th e project , deferrin g aleas e unti l AGLA D coul dpu t th e financing together , whic hwoul dhav e require dane w competitiv e publi c notice , o r workin g ou t

an alternative
. Wit

hAGLA D oppose dt o eithe r

o f th e firs t tw o option s bu t

confiden t i t coul dge t th e financin g togethe r i n th e relativ e near

term , AGLA D propose da"conditiona l lease. " Le e Nun n lette r t o Richar dWilson , Octobe r 24 , 200 5 [ANC-AGLAD-015 7 at 0160] . Thu s th e concep t o f afinancing deadlin e o n whic hth e leas e wa s contingen t actuall y originate d with AGLAD . I t

wa s no t a s a"take-it-or-leav e it " provision , a s allege db y RDM , bu t a negotiate dwork-aroun dt o whic hAGLA D mad e n o objection
. Evidenc e o f other negotiate dprovision s i s containe di n anot e t o file at [ANC-AGLAD-0162] . REBUTTAL RDM , LL C V

. AN C Pag e 1 0 o f 4 2 Docket No . 16-09-1 4