alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      No. 32


CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        ss. 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In
          connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Universal Express,
          Inc.
          (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed
          with
          the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
          I,
          Richard Altomare, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
          of the
          Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
          to
          Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
          the
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
          the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
                    November 14, 2006
                  
                  By: 
/s/
                    Richard AltomareRichard AltomareChief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
                    Officer
 This
          certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
          for
          purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
          authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
          appears
          in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
          by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
          the
          Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
          staff
          upon request.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASIDNGTON, DC 

R.L.S. Rental Company, Inc,. 

d/b/a Mizzou Aviation 

Complainant, 

v. 

City of Joplin, Missouri 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-13-06 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to February 13, 2015. 

An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

~/te#JY ~lS.Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

!It& 1~, Loty 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November~, 2014, I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid)' a{rue copy of the Notice of Extension of 

Time addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Shelley A. Ewalt 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, NY 11753 

Respondent: 

Mr. Peter Edwards 

602 South Main Street 

Joplin, MO 64801 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610 

FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-1 00 

erts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
      (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
      partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






/s/
      Neal
      Ludeke





Neal
      Ludeke


Chief
      Financial Officer of Richman


Housing
      Credits Inc., general partner


of
      Richman Tax Credit Properties III


L.P.,
      General Partner of the Registrant


March
      14,
      2008
CHAPTER 2.4.2.**INFECTION WITH *BONAMIA EXITIOSA***

[...]

**2.2. Host factors**

**2.2.1. Susceptible host species**

~~Oyster species *Ostrea chilensis* (= *Tiostrea chilensis* = *T. lutaria*) (~~~~Dinamani et al., 1987), *O. angasi* (~~~~Corbeil et al., 2006b~~~~;~~~~Hine, 1996~~~~;~~~~Hine & Jones, 1994~~~~), *O. edulis* (~~~~Abollo et al., 2008;~~~~Narcisi et al., 2010~~~~) and *O. stentina* (~~~~Hill et al., 2010~~~~).~~

Species that fulfil the criteria for listing as susceptible to infection with *Bonamia exitiosa* according to Chapter 1.5. of the *Aquatic Animal Health Code* (*Aquatic Code*) are: Argentinean flat oyster (*Ostrea puelchana*), Australian mud oyster *(Ostrea angasi),* Chilean flat oyster *(Ostrea chilensis),*Dwarf oyster*(Ostrea stentina),*Eastern oyster*(Crassostrea virginica),*European flat oyster*(Ostrea edulis),*Olympia oyster*(Ostrea lurida)*and Suminoe oyster*(Crassostrea ariakensis**)*

**2.2.2. ~~Susceptible stages of the host~~ Species with incomplete evidence for susceptibility**

~~In *O. chilensis*, recruit-sized oysters (oysters greater than or equal to 58 mm in length) are known to be susceptible (~~~~Dinamani et al., 1987). In *O. edulis*, the parasite was detected in market-sized (>60 mm) oysters (~~~~Abollo et al., 2008). There are no data concerning the other oyster stages, including spat.~~

~~DNA of *B. exitiosa* has recently been detected in larvae of flat oysters *Ostrea edulis* (~~~~Arzul et al., 2011).~~

Species for which there is incomplete evidence to fulfil the criteria for listing as susceptible to infection with *B. exitiosa* according to Chapter 1.5 of the *Aquatic Code* are: none known

In addition, pathogen-specific positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results have been reported in the following species, but no active infection has been demonstrated: Pacific cupped oyster (*Crassostrea gigas*) and Sydney rock oyster (*Saccostrea glomerata*).

[...]

**________________________**
#### Ambler v. Administrative Director of the Court

17675

12/15/94

Affirmed
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Randy J. Wood, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly charged the jury how to decide whether defendant’s oral statement to the police was voluntarily made and whether defendant was in custody when he spoke *(see,*CPL 710.70 [3]; *People v Graham,*55 NY2d 144). The court also properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the statement. The court’s finding that defendant was not in custody is entitled to great weight *(see, People v Leonti,*18 NY2d 384, 390, *cert denied*389 US 1007) and is supported by the record *(see, People v Yukl, 25*NY2d 585, 588, *cert denied*400 US 851). The gun was properly seized in plain view *(see, Horton v California,*496 US 128) following the police entry into the apartment upon consent of the tenant in control *(see, People v Cosme,*48 NY2d 286, 290-292). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Den-man, Green and Lowery, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
          the year ended March 30, 1999 Form 10K Consolidated Balance Sheets and
          Consolidated Statements of Operations and is qualified in its entirety
          by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                 0000856135
<NAME>                American Tax Credit Properties III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
<CURRENCY>            US Dollars

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        MAR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>           APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>             MAR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.00
<CASH>                           568
<SECURITIES>                   2,890
<RECEIVABLES>                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 9,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,179
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   9,512
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 252
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   (555)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,756)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (76.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Harry Mund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


March 31, 2006                       /s/ Harry Mund
                                    -----------------------
                                    Harry Mund
                                    Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00040

- CV

$5,000 IN U.S. CURRE NCY AND

CHRIS A. ANDERSON

, Appellant s

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 81438

ORDER

Appellant’s Motion for Expedited Ruling was filed on July 29, 2013. It does not

contain a proper proof of service as required by Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Proc edure. It was “served” on only the Clerk of this Court. We have previously

notified appellant by letter dated March 28, 2012 what constituted proper proof of

service and that a copy provided to the Clerk was for “filing” and not as a party to the$5,000 in U.S. Curren cy v. State Page 2

proceed ing to be served. We also warned appellant by the same letter that future

documents not properly served on all parties to the appeal would be stricken.

Because appellant’s motion was not properly served on all parties to the appeal,

in accordance with ou r prior order and notice, the Motion for Expedited Ruling is

stricken.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion stricken

Order issued and filed August 8 , 2013

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 23.1

        CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44620) pertaining to
the Sierra Tucson Companies, Inc., 1992 Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-38608)
pertaining to the Sierra Tucson Companies, Inc., 1990 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated January 29, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of the Company included in the  Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Tucson, Arizona
March 23, 1998
# C_2019025EN.01006001.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/60

---

Action brought on 21 November 2018 — Executive Selling v EUIPO (EXECUTIVE SELLING)

(Case T-689/18)

(2019/C 25/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Executive Selling (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Bouchara and A. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative sign EXECUTIVE SELLING — Application for registration No 1 343 783

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2018 in Case R 313/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | The mark applied for taken as a whole is not descriptive of a characteristic of the services concerned. The analysis adopted by EUIPO is contrary to the terms of the applicable provisions and case-law and the registered sign is perfectly distinctive and therefore capable of fulfilling the essential function of a trademark. |
| --- | --- |

—

The mark applied for taken as a whole is not descriptive of a characteristic of the services concerned. The analysis adopted by EUIPO is contrary to the terms of the applicable provisions and case-law and the registered sign is perfectly distinctive and therefore capable of fulfilling the essential function of a trademark.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER. The Chair has examined the Journal of the last day's 
proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.11

                        ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST

BY THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ("Assignment") made and entered into
as of the 29th day of December 2000, AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT L.C., a Texas Limited
Liability Company.,("Assignor"), and 1st Realty Investments, Inc., a Nevada For
Profit Corporation, ("Assignee"), agree as follows:

      1. Assignment. For the amount of $135.00 evidenced by a note for that
amount from Assignee in favor of Assignor, together with other necessary and
agreed upon consideration as set forth below, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby irrevocably sells, transfers and
assigns to Assignee all of its membership interest and participation percentage
in Houston Damage Control, L.L.C. Assignee hereby accepts the assignment and
transfer of the Assignors' membership interest in Houston Damage Control,
L.L.C., and agrees to assume any and all obligations and responsibilities
associated with such interest from and after the date of this Assignment and
hold Assignors harmless from any and all liabilities relating thereto.

      2. Further Acts: Additional Documents. Assignors and Assignee shall
perform all such further acts and execute and deliver any and all additional
documents and instruments that may be necessary or desirable to consummate,
evidence or confirm the assignment of the interest described herein.

      3. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Assignment has been executed as of the day and
year first above written.

                                             "ASSIGNORS"

                                             AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT, L.C.
                                             a Texas limited liability company

                                             /s/    Edward W. Dietrich
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Name   Edward W. Dietrich
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Title  Vice President
                                                    ----------------------------

                                             "ASSIGNEE"

                                             1st Realty Investments, Inc.
                                             a Nevada For Profit Corporation

                                             /s/    William Szilagyi
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Name   William Szilagyi
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Title  President
                                                    ----------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          82,592
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                       464
<INVENTORY>                                     57,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,076
<PP&E>                                         402,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 120,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,351
<BONDS>                                        275,557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   535,371
<SALES>                                        657,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,278
<CGS>                                          487,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  596,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,806
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37


</TABLE>
Three Months Ended
    
    
    Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    September 30,(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
    
    2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2009Basic Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    882
    
    
    $
    858
    
    
    $
    2,540
    
    
    $
    2,460Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799Basic Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    0.31
    
    
    $
    0.93
    
    
    $
    0.90Diluted Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    882
    
    
    $
    858
    
    
    $
    2,540
    
    
    $
    2,460Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799Weighted average effect of
assumed stock options
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0Total
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799
    
    
    
    2,734,799Diluted Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    0.31
    
    
    $
    0.93
    
    
    $
    0.90
# C_2020230EN.01002402.xml

| 13.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Agrochem-Maks v Commission

(Case T-574/18) (1)

(Plant-protection products - Active substance oxasulfuron - Non-renewal of approval for placing on the market - Obligation to state reasons - Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Manifest error of assessment - Article 6(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and point 2.2 of Annex II to Regulation No 1107/2009 - Precautionary principle)

(2020/C 230/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, I. Naglis and G. Koleva, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, J. Lundberg and H. Eklinder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1019 of 18 July 2018 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance oxasulfuron, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2018 L 183, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present action and in the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present action and in the proceedings for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---