alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. LANDRY:
       H.R. 6276.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 1 of Section 8 of Article I of the United States 
     Constitution and Amendment XVI of the United States 
     Constitution.
```
# C_2020313EN.01002003.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/20

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2020 — Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission, Council of the European Union

(Case C-204/19 P) (1)

(2020/C 313/28)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
# C_2010011EN.01001904.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-357/08) (1)

1

2010/C 11/34

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

54) IV-C-20 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 54 of 232 
P.2 

5 ^W ? I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\*m+£ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JAN - 4 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Henry J. Hyde 

House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Hyde: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of Mr. Larry 

Sherman concerning EPA's proposal to require onboard refueling 

emission controls. Be assured that these comments will be 

considered as we proceed with the next phase of our 

rulemaking. We will also be placing them in the public docket 

for the Rule (Docket No. A-87-11). 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 
P.3
#### Criss v. Kunisada

19361

3/17/98

Denied
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4381 

To require certain holders of a certificate of public convenience and necessity 

issued under the Natural Gas Act to suspend activities authorized by 

the certificate until violations relating to air quality are remediated, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2017 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require certain holders of a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under the Natural Gas Act 

to suspend activities authorized by the certificate until 

violations relating to air quality are remediated, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Gas Pipeline 

5 Public Health Protection Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4381 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVEN2 IENCE AND NECESSITY IN AREAS WITH PRE3 EXISTING UNSAFE AIR POLLUTANT LEVELS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Where certified independent air 

5 quality testing demonstrates an existing violation of a na6 tional ambient air quality standard promulgated under 

7 section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409), or 

8 of a requirement relating to a hazardous air pollutant list9 ed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 7412), at a site (including any community surrounding 

11 such site) that is identified as the proposed location of 

12 a project for which a certificate of public convenience and 

13 necessity has been issued to a covered holder, until such 

14 time as the State environmental authority with jurisdic15 tion over the project site conducts certified independent 

16 air quality testing (or other air quality testing using meth17 ods that have been approved by the State environmental 

18 authority or the Environmental Protection Agency) and 

19 certifies to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

20 that any such violation has been remediated— 

21 (1) the covered holder shall suspend all activi22 ties authorized by the certificate of public conven23 ience and necessity of the covered holder; and 

24 (2) the Commission may not issue any new cer25 tificate of public convenience and necessity under 

26 section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4381 IH

1 to the covered holder with respect to the applicable 

2 project or project site (including any community sur3 rounding such site). 

4 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered 

5 holder’’ means a holder of a certificate of public conven6 ience and necessity, issued under section 7 of the Natural 

7 Gas Act, during the two-year period ending on the date 

8 of enactment of this Act, that has not commenced con9 struction of the project for which such certificate was 

10 issued by such date of enactment. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
July 24, 2015

Mr. Andrew O’Fee

Senior Loan Originator

Crump Mortage

8126 Meadow View Glen Drive

Germantown, TN 38138

Dear Mr. O’Fee :

This is in response to your April 30, 2015

, letter sent to the docket ( No. FAA

- 201 5

- 1355 )

petitioning the Fede ral Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. You requested to conduct aerial videography, photography

, and cinematography using an unmanned aerial system

.

The information you submitted did not com ply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On

June 1, 2015 , the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request

without further information. Specifically, we asked you t o provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On July 24, 2015 , the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the

information a nd finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief and

why granting the request would be in the public interest.2

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has close d your

exemption request. Should yo u wish to provide the additional information please resubmit

your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director

Office of Rulemaking
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 16

- 00746

- CR
Frederick FLETCHER , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR8480 Honorable Andrew Carruthers , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2016
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant Frederick Fletcher has filed a notice of appeal, seeking review of the trial court’s denial of his Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Immediate Release, Reinstatement of Prior Bond Amount, or Setting of Bond Hearing. The trial court denied appellant’s application on May 24, 2016. Appellant did not file his notice o f appeal until October 31, 2016. Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed five months after the trial court’s order was signed, appears to be untimely
filed.04

- 16

- 00746

- CR

- 2

- Therefore, we ordered appellant to show cause on or before December 8, 2016 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM Do not publish
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1280]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

HONORING THE SIXTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF GEORGIA'S OLYMPIC ATHLETES

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. TOM PRICE

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 18, 2012

  Mr. PRICE of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to honor two 
constituents from the 6th Congressional District of Georgia, Kathleen 
Hersey and Eric Hurd, who will compete in the 2012 Summer Olympics in 
London. Kathleen Hersey will be participating in 100m/200m butterfly, 
while Eric Hurd will be in the Slalom Double Canoe event.
  By taking second place in the 200m butterfly, Kathleen qualified for 
her second Olympic games. Last year Kathleen won a national title and a 
gold medal at the Duel in the Pool, both in the 200m butterfly. She 
finished eighth in the same event in Beijing four years ago. Kathleen 
has shown amazing dedication, discipline, and devotion to swimming, 
training roughly 9,000 yards per day, six days a week.
  Eric earned a spot on this year's Olympic team by winning the Gold 
earlier this year at the 2012 Pan American Championship in Brazil. Eric 
also finished first at the 2012 U.S. Olympic Teams Trials in Charlotte, 
North Carolina. Eric's paddling career began at Atlanta's 
``Waterworks''--a single Class II rapid with gates set up for training 
purposes. Since then, he has been preparing rigorously ahead of this 
year's games by training at the U.S. National Whitewater Center in 
Charlotte, North Carolina.
  Mr. Speaker, I know I speak for all Members of the House in wishing 
these two outstanding individuals the best of luck. Their exceptional 
commitment to athleticism is an inspiration to us all. I know Kathleen 
and Eric, along with a multitude of other exceptional athletes across 
this great land of ours, will be a wonderful illustration to the world 
of American strength and perseverance.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. SLAUGHTER:
       H.R. 6207.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 1
       Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 18
```
FIRST DIVISION

DOYLE, C. J.,

REESE and SELF, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules

June 20, 2017

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A15A1281. GLISPIE v. THE STATE. D-020 C

DOYLE, Chief Judge.

In Glispie v. State,

1

the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed in part and reversed

in part thisCourt’s opinion in Glispie v. State.

2 Accordingly, we vacate Division 1 (b)

(ii) of our prior opinion, and we adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court in its place.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

Judgment affirmed. Reese and Self, JJ., concur.

1

 300 Ga. 128 (793 SE2d 381) (2016).

2

 335 Ga. App. 177 (779 SE2d 767) (2015).
#### In the Matter of Max Gross, Petitioner, against New York City Alcoholic Beverage Control Board et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

July 15, 1959.

*Monroe I. Katcher, II,*for petitioner.

*Hyman Amsel, Emanuel D. Black*and *John J. Hyland*for respondents.

*Cohen & Sheen*for United Restaurant Liquor Dealers of Manhattan, Inc., *amicus curiae.*

Henry Epstein, J.

Petitioner seeks to compel respondents to accept his application for a liquor license for on-premises consumption and to have rule 45 of the respondent board declared invalid. Petitioner’s license is for sale of beer and cider at retail in his restaurant. Application for on-premises sale of hard liquor, etc., has been refused. Petitioner must show a clear right to the relief sought *(Colucci*v. *O’Connell,*129 N. Y. S. 2d 613, affd. 283 App. Div. 964). The discretion of respondents board and Authority, respectively, is broad and must necessarily be such in the area of their separate and joint activities *(Matter of Barry*v. *O’Connell,*303 N. Y. 46). Rule 45, which petitioner here attacks, limits the number of on-premises liquor and wine licenses for on-premises consumption after February 1, 1959. No applications (except by waiver by the State Liquor Authority) are to be received for license changes between February 1, 1959 and January 31, 1960. The powers *294of the respondent Authority are broad (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 17, subd. 2).

Even uniformity of rules is expressly waived by the Legislature in section 115. Conditions of like character were sustained as a proper regulation under rule 17 *(Matter of Brenner*v. *O’Connell,*308 N. Y. 636). Limitation of licenses is therefore an appropriate exercise of the authority so vested in the State and local bodies. Petitioner has no property right in the license he seeks, nor is it a privilege of a citizen of the United States or State *(Crowley*v. *Christensen,*137 U. S. 86, 91; *Bertholf*v. *O’Reilly,*74 N. Y. 509). The New York City board’s action was proper, since there was no waiver from the State Authority. The courts should not invade the appropriate province of the State Liquor Authority or the local board *(Matter of Guardian Life Ins. Co.*v. *Bohlinger,*284 App. Div. 110, affd. 308 N. Y. 174).

The Authority has standards for judging the bona fide quality of a restaurant and the relation of sale of foods and liquors. At least two cases have been decided in the Court of Appeals which warrant not interfering with the action here under attack *(Matter of Kate’z Delicatessen*v. *O’Connell,*302 N. Y. 286, 289; *Matter of Kaplan*v. *O’Connell,*305 N. Y. 850). Buie 45 forbids the relief petitioner seeks. It is a reasonable exercise of the rule-making power of the respondent Authority. The decision in *Matter of Kaplan*v. *Rohan*(8 A D 2d 270) is clearly distinguishable on the facts, and there the validity of rule 45 was not attacked as here. This rule has been in effect since 1956 and has not been altered by the Legislature.

Petition dismissed.
nVD Tf^ ' UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N 

### DRIATIO N

Inth e Matte r

of : Federa l Expres s Corporatio n Responden t

Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwi n FA A Docke t No
. CP09NM001 0
FA A Cas e No
. 2007NM70015 6 

# rM'-jido?-07ji i

NOTIC EO FAPPEARANC E Come s no w Lawrenc e W
. Bierlein , Esq. , an dhereb y files thi s Notic e o f Appearanc e i nthi s matte r an dstate s tha t

h e i s representin g Responden t Federa l Expres s Corporatio ni nthi s matter .

Date dthi s 13t

hday o f May , 2010
. Respectfijll y submitted
.

Lawrence^
. Bierlei n 110 1 30thStreet , N W Suit e 50 0 Washington , D C 2000 7 (202 ) 625-835 5 (202 ) 625-436 3 FA X 

# o Pr

^ c * r ^ ^ C r >CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I certif y that atru e an dcorrec t

cop y o f th e foregoin g wa s forwarde dvi aovernigh t delivery o nth e 13 * day o f May , 201 0 to : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n I^XO O Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Mr
. Ange l Collaku Attorne y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-3 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Roo m912- C Washington , D C 2059 1 Ms
. Courtne y E
. Felt s Senio r Attorne y - Regulatory Affair s Federa l Expres s Corporatio n 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3'' * Floo r Memphis , T N3812 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                         2,965
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,905
<INVENTORY>                                    129,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               252,146
<PP&E>                                         558,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          426,234
<BONDS>                                        118,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       54
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   634,640
<SALES>                                        863,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               863,781
<CGS>                                          763,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  763,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               65,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             41,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,941)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4405 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4405

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, as the ``Stanley Michaels Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2017

Mr. Espaillat (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Collins of New 
York, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Donovan, Mr. Engel, Mr. Faso, Mr. Higgins of New 
 York, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Katko, Mr. King of New York, Mrs. Lowey, Mrs. 
 Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, 
 Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Reed, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. 
   Serrano, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. 
 Suozzi, Ms. Stefanik, and Ms. Tenney) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, as the ``Stanley Michaels Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STANLEY MICHAELS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Stanley Michaels Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stanley 
Michaels Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted for the Form
     10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2,738,392
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         203,305,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               10,650,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    10,087,798
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         107,931,153
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           108,352,000
<LOANS>                                        153,291,828
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,405,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,955,916
<DEPOSITS>                                     213,394,282
<SHORT-TERM>                                   22,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            0
<LONG-TERM>                                    31,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          21,850
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,834,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 296,955,916
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                12,170,938
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              7,824,115
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               76,821
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               20,071,871
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             8,102,809
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,029,032
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          10,042,842
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  426,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             29,387
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,865,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,434,300
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,504,823
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,504,823
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.73
<LOANS-NON>                                    2,164,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   456,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,573,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  602,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   7,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,405,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,405,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,180,000
        


</TABLE>