alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1325]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 CONGRESSIONAL REPLACEMENT OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S ENERGY-RESTRICTING AND 
                  JOB-LIMITING OFFHSORE DRILLING PLAN

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                        HON. FORTNEY PETE STARK

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 24, 2012

       The House in Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
     the Union had under consideration the bill (H.R. 6082) to 
     officially replace, within the 60-day Congressional review 
     period under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, President 
     Obama's Proposed Final Outer Continental Shelf Oil & Gas 
     Leasing Program (2012-2017) with a congressional plan that 
     will conduct additional oil and natural gas lease sales to 
     promote offshore energy development, job creation, and 
     increased domestic energy production to ensure a more secure 
     energy future in the United States, and for other purposes:

  Mr. STARK. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to H.R. 6082, the so-
called ``Congressional Replacement of President Obama's Energy-
Restricting and Job-Limiting Offshore Drilling Plan.'' This bill opens 
up nearly every last piece of our public lands to drilling, giving even 
more to Big Oil. The bill would require oil and gas leasing off the 
East Coast, from Maine to South Carolina, off of Southern California 
and in the important fishery of Bristol Bay off Alaska. It opens up 
California's coastline to oil and gas companies as early as 2013. If 
this bill were to become law, areas that have previously been deemed 
off limits to oil development by state governments would be put up for 
lease.
  This bill also fails to secure safety reforms for offshore drilling, 
nor does it ensure that oil companies are paying their fair share to 
drill on public lands. The California Coastline is an international 
treasure and is one of the primary drivers of our state's economy. We 
must protect our coastlines and the vital ecosystems they embody. We 
cannot place it at risk of an oil spill or give it away to reckless, 
profit-seeking oil companies. We cannot and will not drill our way to 
energy independence. Continuing to make our cars more efficient, 
investing in clean and renewable energy, ending subsidies and tax 
breaks for the fossil fuel industry, and putting a price on carbon 
emissions is how we can obtain a secure and sustainable energy future.
  I urge my colleagues to oppose this senseless and harmful legislation 
by joining me in voting ``no.''

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5480]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 TRIBUTE TO MAJOR GENERAL HUGH BROOMALL

 Mr. COONS. Mr. President, it is with great pleasure that I pay 
tribute to MAJ General Hugh Broomall. After spending nearly 38 years 
serving Delaware and our Nation with the Delaware National Guard, 
General Broomall is retiring. He will leave behind an organization he 
helped to strengthen and a legacy of service that will not soon be 
forgotten. A native of Wilmington, DE, General Broomall's military 
career began when he enlisted in the Delaware Air National Guard, where 
he went on to receive a commission in 1974. General Broomall became an 
air intelligence officer and deployed worldwide in support of exercises 
and contingencies. Most recently, General Broomall served as the 
special assistant to the Director of the Air National Guard, where he 
was responsible for strategy development, State and Federal liaison, 
interagency coordination, and special studies supporting the 106,000 
Air National Guard members nationwide.
  General Broomall's impact is not limited to Delaware. When asked 
about General Broomall, LTG Bud Wyatt said, ``his multi-dimensional 
experience, both civilian and military, makes him an outstanding asset 
to the Nation. His tireless work with the military, private industry 
and the Hill during critical budget times, directly contributed to 
keeping the Air National Guard ready, relevant and reliable to serve 
both our state and federal military requirements well into the future. 
He is an outstanding American.''
  I couldn't agree more. And so, I congratulate Hugh Broomall for his 
years of exemplary service and countless contributions to the Delaware 
National Guard, as well as the national military community, the people 
of Delaware and the country that he loves. General Broomall is an 
exemplary citizen, and on behalf of all Delawareans I would like to 
thank him and his family for their many sacrifices during his 38 years 
of service and wish him well in his retirement.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2019065EN.01004302.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/43

---

Action brought on 11 December 2018 — Dragnea v Commission

(Case T-738/18)

(2019/C 65/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Liviu Dragnea (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor and S. Gubel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission decision (OCM(2018)20575) sent to the legal representative of the applicant by letter dated 1 October 2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision (OCM(2018)20575) sent to the legal representative of the applicant by letter dated 1 October 2018;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a breach of articles 9(1), 9(2) and 9(4) of the OLAF Regulation (1) and a violation of the rights of defence of the applicant in the investigations, including the right to be heard and the respect of the presumption of innocence. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a breach of articles 9(1), 9(2) and 9(4) of the OLAF Regulation (1) and a violation of the rights of defence of the applicant in the investigations, including the right to be heard and the respect of the presumption of innocence.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of sound administration in relation to the investigations as well as the refusal to open an investigation on the conduct of the OLAF investigation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of sound administration in relation to the investigations as well as the refusal to open an investigation on the conduct of the OLAF investigation.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a violation of the right of access to documents concerning the OLAF investigation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a violation of the right of access to documents concerning the OLAF investigation.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Performance Food Group Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-72400, 333-12223, 333-78229, 333-60528, 333-102154, 333-102155, 333-105082,
333-117355) on Form S-8, the registration statements (Nos. 333-24679,
333-61612, 333-68877) on Form S-4 and the registration statements (Nos.
333-48462 and 333-63610) on Form S-3 of Performance Food Group Company of our
reports dated March 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Performance Food Group Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and
January 1, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005, the related financial statement
schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Performance Food Group
Company.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 6, 2006
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4530

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TONY EDWARD COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-97-39) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. E. Gay Leonard, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tony Edward Coleman appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§841(a)(1) & 846 (1994). Coleman’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that in her view there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Despite notice from the court, Coleman has not filed a supplemental pro se brief. The issues raised by Coleman’s counsel are without merit. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment. Coleman assigns error to the district court’s order denyinghis motion for a new trial on the grounds that one of the Government’s key witnesses, Barry English, had a prior perjury conviction unknown by the two parties until after Coleman’s conviction and before sentencing. We review a district court’s denial of a motion for a new trial for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Arrington, 757 F.2d 1484, 1486 (4th Cir. 1985). We affirm the conviction and district court’s order denying the motion for a new trial on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Coleman , CR-97-39 (W.D. Va. Jul. 2, 1998). This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of the client’s right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to3 withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2008260EN.01001102.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon (Belgium) lodged on 7 August 2008 — Marc Vandermeir v État Belge — SPF Finances

(Case C-364/08)

(2008/C 260/20)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de Première Instance d'Arlon

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Marc Vandermeir

Applicant:

Defendant: État Belge — SPF Finances

Defendant:

Question referred

Do Articles 43 and/or 49 EC preclude national legislation of one Member State, such as the legislation in question, which requires a self-employed person residing in that Member State to register his vehicle there, although he carries on business almost exclusively in a second Member State from a fixed establishment that he owns there, and the vehicle is neither intended to be substantially used in the first Member State on a permanent basis, nor is in fact so used?

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86934-86935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--America's Datahub Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 6, 2023, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), America's DataHub 
Consortium (``ADC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Action Engineering LLC, Golden, CO; Annapurna Solutions 
LLC, Houston, TX; Clinovations Government + Health, Inc., Washington, 
DC; Datavant, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Department of Health Outcomes 
and Biomedical Informatics, Gainesville, FL; dibdobai, Bethesda, MD; 
HealthVerity, Inc., Philadelphia, PA; Marshall University, Huntington, 
WV; Mathematica, Inc., Princeton, NJ; National Science and Engineering 
Alliance, Lake City, SC; Neoskye, Inc., Newington, CT; Seven Bridges 
Genomics, Inc. dba Velsera, Charlestown, MA; Stealth Software 
Technologies, Inc., Los Angeles, CA; Strategix, Sheridan, WY; Theta 
LLC, Baltimore, MD and TMGcore, Inc., Plano, TX, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ADC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 11, 2021, ADC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72628).

[[Page 86935]]

    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 13, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2023 (88 FR 66060).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27563 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5805]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99205; File No. SR-NYSE-2023-41]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Price List

December 19, 2023.
    On November 1, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend its Price List to: (1) modify fee rates 
and requirements for transactions that remove liquidity from the 
Exchange; (2) offer a monthly rebate for Designated Market Maker units 
with 150 or fewer assigned securities along with incentives for 
affiliated Supplemental Liquidity Providers; and (3) eliminate an 
underutilized fee for transactions that remove liquidity from the 
Exchange in Tape B and C securities. The proposed rule change was 
published for comment on November 21, 2023.\3\ On December 18, 2023, 
NYSE withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2023-41).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98953 (November 15, 
2023), 88 FR 81114.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-28326 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
June 2023

There were 11 surveillance inspections conducted at 10 different sites for a total of 

55 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities. 

The water temperatures continued to increase in response to warmer air 

temperatures. Routine harvest continued and spring stocking was completed. One 

Category 2 site was identified and is scheduled for biweekly sampling. All other sites 

with fish in the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

July 2022 120 1 25057

August 2022 81 0 25138

September 2022 74 0 25212

October 2022 66 0 25278

November 2022 55 0 25333

December 2022 69 0 25402

January 2023 100 0 25502

February 2023 74 0 25576

March 2023 35 0 25611

April 2023 59 0 25670

May 2023 60 0 25730

June 2023 55 1 25785
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 426th District Court of Bell County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on June 17,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Lane Andrew Pickle v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-15-00021-CR Trial Court Number: 73248

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated June 17, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on September 3, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 2, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Ilia
Lekach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             By:  /s/ Ilia Lekach
                                                ---------------------------
                                                  Ilia Lekach
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  October 6, 2003
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

 

 

To Stockholders and Board of Directors

BogenCommunications International, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference inthe registration statements (Nos. 333-21245, 333-52774, and 333-52776) on FormsS-8, and (No. 333-76993) on Form S-3 of Bogen Communications International,Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2002, relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Bogen Communications International, Inc. and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and related schedule,which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K ofBogen Communications International, Inc.

 

 

**KPMG LLP**

Short Hills, New Jersey

March 27, 2002