alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IR C U IT JULY 25, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 16965 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 0 1 6 9 - C R - WS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s W I L B E R J A C K S O N , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rt h e So u th e r n D i s tr i c to f A l a b a ma

_________________________ ( Ju l y 25, 2006) B efo re B L A C K , B A R K E T T an d M A R C U S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: W illia m G r e g o r y H u g h e s , a p p o in te d c o u n s e l f o rW ilb e rJ a c k s o n in th is di re ctcr i m i nal appeal , has f i l ed a m ot i on t o w i thd ra w , supp ort ed by a bri ef pr e pa r e d pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f or ni a , 386 U . S . 738, 8 7 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d.Jac ks on su g g e sts that hedid

no t un de rs tand

theple a a gre e me nt h e signe d a

nd that hi s 1 tria l c ouns e l li e d to him

in o rd e r t o g e t him to sign the a gre e me nt. Our ind epe nd e nt re view re ve a ls that the district court fully complied with the three“core conc erns ” o f Fe d . R . Crim. P. 11(b), se e Un ite d St ate s v , Q uin on e s, 97 F .3 d 47 2, 47 5 (1 1th Cir . 1 99 6) (discus sin gc ore c on c e rn s o f R ule 11), and w e havefound no evide nce in the re cord of improper induce ment or misrepre sentation of theple a a gre e me nt. 2 2 d 4 9 3 (196 7). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of t he ent i re re cord revea l s thatcoun se l’ s a s s e s s m e ntof

t he r e l a t i ve m e r i tof

the ap p ea l i s c or r e c t . W e a r e unpe r s ua de d by th e arg u m en tJack so n rai ses i n h i s resp o n se t o co u n sel ’ s m o t io n , a s it d o es n o trai se a n is s u e o f

a r g u a b le m e r it. 1 B e c a u s e in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls n o a r g u a b le issu es o f m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , J a c k s o n ’ s mo t i o n f or n ew co u n sel i s d en i ed as M OOT , and Jack so n ’s co nv i ct i on and sent ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5480]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               TRIBUTE TO THE DISABILITY RIGHTS MOVEMENT

 Mr. HARKIN. Mr. President, the National Constitution Center in 
Philadelphia, which opened on July 4, 2003, is the first and only 
nonprofit, nonpartisan institution devoted to the world's oldest and 
most respected framework for democratic government: the Constitution of 
the United States. Located on historic Independence Mall, the center is 
many things: an interactive museum, a national town hall, and a civic 
hub for millions of visitors from around the world. It inspires active 
citizenship by shining a spotlight on our great constitutional 
principles, ideals, and freedoms.
  This Saturday, the center's main exhibition, which is called ``The 
Story of We the People,'' is inaugurating an important new addition: 
the wheelchair used by disability-rights advocate Justin Dart, Jr., 
when he was present alongside President George H.W. Bush at the signing 
of the Americans with Disabilities Act on July 26, 1990. Mr. Dart used 
that wheelchair on countless other occasions as he advocated for 
passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act and to secure for people 
with disabilities the civil rights that all Americans hold sacred.
  This wonderful new addition to the National Constitution Center will 
serve as a symbol of freedom for all Americans. The wheelchair will 
remind visitors of the visionary leadership and inspired advocacy of 
Justin Dart, Jr., and the courageous struggle of all those in the 
disability rights movement who fought to pass the ADA, one of the great 
civil rights laws of the 20th century, often referred to as the 
Emancipation Proclamation for people with disabilities.
  Twenty-two years ago today, as President Bush signed the ADA into 
law, he said: ``Let the shameful wall of exclusion finally come 
tumbling down.'' I was present at that White House ceremony, and I 
vividly remember the joy and pride on Justin Dart's face as he sat 
aside the President. As of this Saturday, visitors to the National 
Constitution Center, when they view Justin Dart's wheelchair and 
accompanying photos, will be able to relive that great moment and 
milestone in our Nation's history.

                          ____________________
```
#### Matsuo v. Matsuo

19822

5/27/98

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part & Remanded
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1341-E1342]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       NORTHERN NEVADA'S OLYMPIAN

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. MARK E. AMODEI

                               of nevada

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, July 26, 2012

  Mr. AMODEI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Jacob ``Jake'' 
Dalton of Reno, Nevada as he represents his country in the 2012 Olympic 
Games in London as a member of the U.S. men's gymnastics team.
  Jake, a 2009 graduate of Spanish Springs High School and scholarship 
recipient at the University of Oklahoma, has the reputation of a fierce 
and proven competitor. Only 20 years old, Jake is already a champion, 
winning two NCAA titles in 2011 and the all-around gold in the Winter 
Cup Challenge in 2011.
  To earn his place on the team, Dalton excelled in the U.S. Olympic 
trials in San Jose, California, winning both the vault and the floor 
exercise. His teammates are Jonathan Horton, Danell Leyva, Sam Mikulak, 
John Orozco, and

[[Page E1342]]

alternates Chris Brooks, Steven Legendre, Alex Naddour. This men's 
gymnastics team is considered the best since 1984 when the United 
States won gold at the Los Angeles Olympic Games.
  Jake, like all other Americans participating in the Olympics, gives 
our country a great sense of pride. I join my fellow Nevadans and the 
rest of the country in wishing good luck to Team USA and Jake as he 
tries to bring home the gold to the Silver State.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2020320EN.01002101.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Gera — Germany) — PG v Volkswagen AG

(Case C-759/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/42)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
# C_2008209EN.01001801.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/18

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 May 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Den Haag (Netherlands)) — M. Ilhan v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-42/08) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Freedom to provide services - Articles 49 EC to 55 EC - Motor vehicles - Use in one Member State of a motor vehicle registered and leased in another Member State - Taxation of that vehicle in the first Member State)

(2008/C 209/25)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: M. Ilhan

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Den Haag — Interpretation of Articles 49 EC to 55 EC — National rules providing for imposition of a registration tax on first use of a vehicle on the national road network irrespective of the duration of use of that network — Liability to tax of a person established in that Member State who has leased a vehicle which is registered in another Member State and which is intended for use essentially in the first Member State for professional and private purposes for a period of three years

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 EC to 55 EC preclude the application of national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, by virtue of which a person, residing or established in a Member State, who uses — primarily in that Member State — a motor vehicle registered and leased in another Member State, must, on first use of that vehicle on the road network of the first Member State, pay a tax which is calculated without taking into account the duration of the leasing agreement for that vehicle or the length of time that vehicle will be used on that road network.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
#### Vidmar, Appellant, *v.*Zangerle, Aud., et al., Appellees.

(No. 32064

Decided March 15, 1950.)

*Mr. William A. Vidmar, in propria persona.*

*Mr. Franlt T. Gullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Saul S. Danaceau,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Tart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do
hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: September 18,
      2009 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       | 
|------------------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                                | Todd E. Wille          
|                                | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4296 

To place requirements on operational risk capital requirements for banking 

organizations established by an appropriate Federal banking agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2017 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself and Mr. MEEKS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To place requirements on operational risk capital requirements for banking organizations established by an appropriate Federal banking agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPERATIONAL RISK CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 

4 FOR BANKING ORGANIZATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—An appropriate Federal banking 

6 agency may not establish an operational risk capital re7 quirement for banking organizations, unless such require8 ment— 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4296 IH

1 (1) is based primarily on the risks posed by a 

2 banking organization’s current activities and busi3 nesses; 

4 (2) is appropriately sensitive to the risks posed 

5 by such current activities and businesses; 

6 (3) is determined under a forward-looking as7 sessment of potential losses that may arise out of a 

8 banking organization’s current activities, businesses, 

9 and exposures, which is not solely based on a bank10 ing organization’s historical losses; and 

11 (4) permits adjustments based on qualifying 

12 operational risk mitigants. 

13 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

14 (1) APPROPRIATE FEDERAL BANKING AGEN15 CY.—The term ‘‘appropriate Federal banking agen16 cy’’— 

17 (A) has the meaning given such term 

18 under section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insur19 ance Act; and 

20 (B) means the National Credit Union Ad21 ministration, in the case of an insured credit 

22 union. 

23 (2) BANKING ORGANIZATION.—The term 

24 ‘‘banking organization’’ means— 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4296 IH

1 (A) an insured depository institution (as 

2 defined under section 3 of the Federal Deposit 

3 Insurance Act); 

4 (B) an insured credit union (as defined 

5 under section 101 of the Federal Credit Union 

6 Act); 

7 (C) a depository institution holding com8 pany (as defined under section 3 of the Federal 

9 Deposit Insurance Act); 

10 (D) a company that is treated as a bank 

11 holding company for purposes of section 8 of 

12 the International Banking Act; and 

13 (E) a U.S. intermediate holding company 

14 established by a foreign banking organization 

15 pursuant to section 252.153 of title 12, Code of 

16 Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric R. Boyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
10th day of November, 2003.



/s/ Eric R. Boyer
-------------------------------
Eric R. Boyer
President and CEO
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.
# C_2019139EN.01005801.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/58

---

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 —  ND (*1) and  OE (*1) v Commission

(Case T-581/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Discrimination alleged against European officials and other national residents concerning the method of calculating the net remuneration determining the tariff of certain social benefits - Coordination of social security systems - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Failure to bring infringement proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: ND (*1) and  OE (*1) (represented by: A. Bove, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision contained in the Commission letter of 27 July 2018, notified to the applicants on 30 July 2018, by which the Commission decided to take no further action on their complaint against the City of Luxembourg, the State of Luxembourg and the Administrative Court of Luxembourg.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | ND (*1) and  OE (*1) are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ND (*1) and  OE (*1) are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

---
1

From: Chris Howard [mailto:choward@gbuapcd.org]  

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 5:21 PM

To: Duane Ono <dono@gbuapcd.org>; Ken Richmond <krichmond@ramboll.com>

Cc: Phill Kiddoo <pkiddoo@gbuapcd.org>

Subject: Background PM10 is 10.5 μg/m3

See attached worksheet. 

Using the TEOM monitors included in the 2002 background calculation ... 

 Dirty Socks

 Keeler (#2 and #3)

 Flat Rock

 Shell Cut

 Olancha

 Lone Pine (FDMS AND TEOM)

...I determined the calm days, when hourly average wind speed did not exceed 6m/s at any of the said monitors. 

(A cutoff of 5m/s seemed to cut out too many days.) 

For the same monitors, I determined the average daily PM10 on these calm days. These averages are shown in 

the attached pivot. The right-most column shows the average PM10 of the monitors for each day. Between 

March 1993 and October 2015, the average of the daily averages (ie background concentration) is 10.5 μg/m3. 

-Chris
# C_2010011EN.01000601.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 November 2009 — SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-564/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Market for electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products - Article 15(2) of Regulation No 17 - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Turnover and share of the relevant market - Value of ‘captive’ use - Principle of equal treatment - Principle of proportionality)

2010/C 11/09

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: SGL Carbon (represented by: M. Klusmann, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and W. Mölls, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 8 October 2008 in Case T-68/04 SGL Carbon v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the application brought by the appellant for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/420/EC of 3 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement concerning an agreement in the market for electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products and, in the alternative, an application for the reduction of the fine imposed on the appellant — Failure to take into consideration, by classifying it as a new complaint that is inadmissible, the appellant’s argument concerning the taking into account of the value of the captive use in calculating the turnover and market shares of the undertakings concerned — Infringement of the principles of proportionality and equal treatment

SGL Carbon

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Carbon AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Carbon AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69 of 21.03.2009

1

---
# C_2010113EN.01000602.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-198/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 95/59/EC - Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco - Article 9(1) - Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products - National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes and a minimum retail selling price for fine-cut tobacco - Justification - Protection of public health - World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control)

2010/C 113/08

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and R. Lyal, Agents, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, J. Bauer and C. Pesendorfer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 9(1) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco (OJ 1995 L 291, p. 40) — Fixing of the minimum retail selling prices for manufactured tobacco by the public authorities

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force legislation by which the public authorities fix minimum prices for the retail sale of cigarettes and fine-cut tobacco for the rolling of cigarettes, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9(1) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco, as amended by Council Directive 2002/10/EC of 12 February 2002; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force legislation by which the public authorities fix minimum prices for the retail sale of cigarettes and fine-cut tobacco for the rolling of cigarettes, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9(1) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco, as amended by Council Directive 2002/10/EC of 12 February 2002;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 197, 2.8.2008.

1

---
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The  Board  of  Directors
Summit  Financial  Corporation
We  consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8  (No.  33-83538,  33-94962, and 33-94964) of Summit Financial Corporation of
our  report  dated  January  18,  2002, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets  of  Summit  Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
December  31,  2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders'  equity  and  comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years  in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in
the  December  31,  2001  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of  the  Company.

                                       /s/  KPMG  LLP
Greenville,  South  Carolina
March  27,  2002