Zero Ozone Depleting Blowing Agents for

Use in Polyurethane Based Foam Insulations

E. Blevins and J. Sharpe

Martin Marietta Manned Space Systems

Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

A. Fine and B. Kopko

Global Change Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

Due to environmental concerns, the polyurethane insulation industry is tasked with

replacing CFC-l1. Any teplacewent blowing agent must meet the dual challenge of being

environmentally friendly, and retaining the properties that have made CFC-ll so desirable.

These desirable physical properties include: solubility in both the isocyanate 'and polyol

components of polyurethane based foams, a boiling point just above 23°C at ambient

pressure, molecular weight around 130 grams per mole, and a low thermal conductivity.

The blowing agents reported in this paper are near drop-in replacements for CFC-ll. The

two fluorinated ethers reported are soluble in polyurethane foam components; have boiling

points of 29 to 30°C; have molecular weights similar to that of CFC-ll; and produce foam

'insulations with good mechanical and thermal properties. This paper reports the physical

properties of these ethers, and the mechanical strength, flammability, and thermal

conductivity of a rigid, polyurethane based, thermally stable, cryogenic insulation foamed

with these ethers.

Introduction

Thermal Prptection Systems (TPS) of the National Aernautics and Space Administration

(NASA) Space Shuttle's External Tank (ET) include polyurethane and polyisocyanurate

foam insulations. These insulations serve to maintain cryogenic propellant quality.

mainWn structural temperature limits, arid minimize the formation ofice and frost that

could potentially damage the fragile insulation of the space shuttle orbiter. The TPS must

pass cryogenic flexure and substrateadhesion tests at -253°C, aerothermal and radiant

-heating rates of up to approximately 12 British Thermal Units per square foot per second,

and thermal conductivity tests~ Currently, ET foams are blown with CFC-l1,and HCFC141b is scheduled for use in production by 1995. Realizing that HCFC's are an interinl

blowing agent, several third generationblowing agents are under evaluation for use in ET

insulations. This paper reports data onJwo fluorinated ethers under investigation as

blowing agents for thermal protection systems ofthe Space Shuttle External Tank.

The fluorinated ethers E245 and E263, produced in limited quantities by Halocarbon

Products of North Augusta, South Carolina, have proven to be_ excellent blowing agents of

polyurethane based foam insulations. Data indicates that these third generation blowing

agents with zero ozone depletion potential (GDP) may serve as near drop-in replacements

for chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) blowing agents.

Experimental

Development ofthese blowing agents was initiated by evaluating the physical properties of

the fluorinated ethers, followed by a study oftheir solubility in 'polyurethane foam

components. Studies were then performed to determine the effects of the~e blowing agents

0!l the foaming reaction and the final properties of the insulations produced

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
Physical Properties of the fluorinated Ethers

Physical propenies ofthese ethers are presented in Table 1. A review ofthis data indicates

thafthese fluorinated ethers can be expected to serve as foaming agents with a blowing

efficienCy similar to that of CFC-ll ~use of their similarmolecular weights and boiling

points. The shorter atmospheric lifetime and projected lower cost ofE263 are positive

traits that must be weighed against its low flash ,pOint and flammability concerns. Another

advantage is demonstrated in Figure 1, which shows E263 has a slightly lower vapor phase

therrilal conductivity than E245 at temperatures below 32°C.' Both E245 and E263 were

carried forward in experimentation asfoam blowing agents. The initial work was to

detemUne solubility of the ethers in the isocyanate and polyol components ofthe urethane

insulation. As presented inTable 1, E245 and E263 are sufficiently soluble in these

urethaile components to make processing possible with existing polyurethane industry

equipment .

Table 1. Properties or E245 and E263

E245 E263 CFC-11 HCFC-141b

mCH20CHF2 CF3CH20CH3 CFClJ CH3W2E

'Molecular Weight 150 114 137 . 111

Speci¥c Gravity 1.14 1.16 1.49 1.24

Boiling point (0C) 29 30 24 32

Ozon~ Depletion Potential 0 0 1 0.15

Atmospheric Lifetime 1 6 years 2 months 70 years 12 years

Global Warming Potential 2 0.15 0 1 0.09

Flashpoint 3 none -16°C none none

Flammability 4 non flam. 4.5-14.3% non flam. 7.6-17.7%

Isocyanate Solubility 5 13% by weight 20% >50% >50%

Polyol Solubility 5 infmite >26% >50% >50%

Toxicity 6 limited data limited data non-toxic limited data

1 Initially there was a concern that these ethers may fO,rm peroxides with aging and exposure to air. The

manufacturer has worked with National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIS1) to evaluate the

chances of this occurence in E245. The long atmospheric lifetime of this prOduct precludes the formation

of peroxides. Nevertheless, the manufacturerattempted to form peroxides by oxygenating the material, but

, no Peroxides were detected. The degradation ofE263 has not beeIttested, but according to NIST

repres~ntatives, the long cham ethers that typically form peroxides have an atmospheric lifetime of only

several hours, where E263 h3$ an atmospheric lifetime of 2 months.

2 Estimates only. £263 may be classified as a volatile organic compound.

·3 E245 & E263 tested by ASTM D 92. CFC-ll & HCFC-141b tested by ASTM D 1310 and D 56.

4 A blend of E245 and E263 was proposed as a means to reduce the flammability of E263. By calculation

using the ASTM E 681 equation to estimate Lower Flammability Limit (LFL), 79.7 molar % E245 is

required to raise the LFL of an E2451E263 blend to that of HCF<:'-141b (7% in air). The manufacturer

determined empirically that 75% E245 was required to raise the LFL according to the Cleveland Open Cup

Test Method (ASTM D 92).

5 Solubility tested in proprietary foam formulation containing polymeric methylene diisocyanate and

polyester polyols.

6 Limited toxicity testing has been conducted. Four hour rate exposure tests were run on E245, and in

those conditions the material was considered to be safe. A general waiver for materials used for research

purposes exists. Commercial production would require EPA approval and would almost certainly require

additional toxicity testing.

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
Figure 1. Vapor Phase Thermal Conductivity

1S ..,.....-------------------,

_ 14-

°..@

12·

:E

-

Col oS 10-

=

Q

c..>

•

• •

•

- a- s

&. .. .: ... Eo-<

S10 20 30 40

Temperature (0C)

50 so

Foam Preparation

InitiallY,J50 isocyanate index, rigid isocyai1Urate foams were produced with a free rise

density of approximately 3.6 pounds per cubic foot (pet). More recently, foams have been

produced with a lower qensity of approximately 2.3 pef. Testing of the lower density

foams iscurrently in progress. Table 2 shows that E245 and E263 do not hinder the

foaming reaction, and produce foams with similar free rise densities when substituted on a

molecular weight basis.

Table 2. Reactivity and Free Rise Density or Foams Blown with E24S, E263, CFC11, and HCFC·141b

£245 £263 CFC·ll HCFC-141b

High Density

Gel Time (sec) 57 53 52 49

Density (pet) 3.43 3.65 3.66 3.85

...

Low Density

Gel Time (sec) 61 48 46 54

Density (pet) 2.20 2.27 2.34 2.30

Hand mix reactivity tests with 70±2°P component temperatures.

J

Foam Properties - Mechanical, Flammability, and Thermal Conductivity

Test panels ofthese foam insulations were hand mixed and molded at component and mold

temperatures of 25°C. In some Gases, the density ofthe molded pans varied ±OA pounds

per cubic foot; actual density is reported in all tables. Mechanical tests run on these molded

panels included: friability (ASTM C 421), compressive strength (ASTM D 1621), bond

adhesion at 21°C, 149°C, and -253°C (ASTM 01623), cohesive strength atroom

tempe.rature (ASTM D 1623) and cryogenic strain compatibility in a gradient cryofJexure

test at -253°C (Martin Marietta Corporation in':'house test). Data from mechanical tests are

presented in Taole 3. The data establishes foams produced with the fluorinated ethers had

properties similar to the foams produced with CFC-l1.

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
... Data not yet available. Elected to evaluate E245, with no flashpoint, first

1 Adhesion to epoxy primed 2219 aluminum

2 AlUininum substrate with 1 inch of insulation is mechanically stressed to 30 ksi, while a thermal stress

is applied by a -253°C backface temperature.

Limitefi flammability test;i.ng has been completed to date, but available-data is presented in

Table 4. Since E245 and E263 are ethers, there was an initial concern that they would

increase the flammability of foams produced. In a proprietary isocyanurate foam system,

this was not the case. Limiting Oxygen Index (LOr - ASTM D 2863) is the percent oxygen

required to sustain a flame. The foams based on E245 and E263, despite the slightly lower

density, have LOr values of 2K6 and 27.7 r~spectively, and are comparable to foams .

produced with CFC and HCFC blowing agents. Flammability by NHB 8060.1B is a test

developed by NASA to quantify flammability ofmaterials in air or in oxygen rich

environments. Results are reported as inches burned, and a value of 3.5 to 4.5 inches in

.air is excellent. Data for foam recession in a radiant heat/vacuum environment and in an

aerothermal environment are not yet a,vailable. Scheduled tests will be run at heating rates

from 7 to 15 British Thermal Units per square foot per second.

... Data not yet available.

** Fl;unmability per NASA test procedure NHB 8060.lB

Flammability tests are run in controlled environments and should not be construed to determine the

potential hazards of these materials in fIres.

Thermal conductivity (ASTM C 177) data is presented in Table 5. One test was run for

each test temperature. Neither foam was consistently better than the other at all test

temperatures. The values presented show that despite the higher thermal conductivity of

the E245 blowing agent in the vapor phase, the thermal conductivity ofthe high density.

molded foams produced with these blowing ag~nts is comparable to foams produced with

CFC-IL The limited solubility ofthese blowing agents is perhaps one reason for the

lower overall foam conductivity. The lower solubility of the blowing agent makes it more.

likely to have many gas nucleation sites. Thisgreater number of nucleation sites translates

into more numerous, smaller bubbles producing a foamed structure with finer cells.

Figures 2 through 5 show that the cellular structure ofthe foams produced with E245 and

E263 is finer than with CFC-ll or HCFC-141b. The foams have a wide distribution of

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
Figure 2. . Cellular Structure of Polyisocyanurate Foam

Produced with E245 Blowing Agent

Figure 3. CelhIlar Structure of Polyisocyanurate Foam

Produced with E263 Blowing Agent

..~.

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
Figure 4. Cellular Structure of Polyisocyanurate Foam

Produced _!!,!_tb CFC.l!.. J31owi~g .:~gent _

Figure S. Celluiar Structure of Polyisocyanurate Foam

Produced with HCFC-141b Blowing Agent .

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
cell sizes because they were hand mixed, but foams produced with the fluorinated ethers

have more small cells. This fine cellular structure plays a major role in the thermal

conductivity ofthe foams, and compensates for the higher vapor phase thermal

conductivity ofthe fluorinated ethers. Although data is not yet available, one would expect

that the insulations produced with these fluorinated ethers would have less drift in thermal

conductivity with aging. The larger, less soluble molecules should remain in the insulation

longer than the smaller CFC-ll molecules. "

Table S. Thermal Conductivity or Foams Produced with E24S and CFC-ll,

Thennal Conductivity (W/m°K)

Test Temperature (OC)

-130

o

52

200

:Density (PCt)

E245

0.0220

0.0249

0.0326

0.0502

4.86

CfC-ll

0.0209

0.0253

0.0272

0.0523

4.45

Data for the low density foams is not yet available

Co"nchisions

-The data presented warrants further evaluation of these fluorinated ethers as blowing agents

for urethane based foam insulations. The major issue associated with these blowing agents

is ~e fact that these fluorinated eth~rs are not commercially available. Toxicity tests must

still be run, ai1~ the handling ofE263 with the 4.5 to 14.3% flammability limits in air must

be addressed. Users and manufacturers must work together to initiate and fund the toxicity

"testing so these materials with zero ozone depletion potential may be made available to

industry.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Space Shuttle External Tank Project ofthe National

_Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration under contract NAS8-36200. Efforts were "

coordinated with the Global Change Division ofthe U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency. Flainmability testing ofE263 wa.s performed by N. Dean Smith ofthe Air and

- Energy Engineering Research Laboratory at EPA in Research Triangle Park, North

catolina. Vapor phase the~ conductivity testing ofE245 and £263 was completed by

Rich Perkins in the Thermophysics Division at NIST in Bolder, Colorado.

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8
References

Adcock. "Fluorinated Eth~: A New Family of Halons", International CFC and Halon Alr.ematives

Conference, Baltimore, MD, 1991,342-50.

Adcock, "Fluorinated Ethers: A New Series ofCFC Substitutes", International CFC and Halon

Alternatives Conference, Baltimore, MD, 1991,.386-95.

Allied Signal Literature

Bare, "Compressor Calorimeter Testing of Fluorinated Ethers and Fluorinated Propanes", International CFC

and Halon Alternatives Conference, Baltimore, MD, 1991,418-27. .

Benning, Calvin J. Plastic Foams, Volume n, Structure, Properties, and Applications, Wiley Interseience,

1969

Robbins, "Preliminary Studies of the Anesthetic Activity of Fluorinated Hydrocarbons", Journal of

Phar:macology, 1945.

Speers, Szur, Terrell, Treadwell, and Ucciardi, "General Anesthetics. 2. Halogenated Methyl Isopropyl

Ethers", Journal ofMedicinal Chemistry, 14,593.

".

Terrell, Speers, ~zur. Treadwell, and Ucciardi, "General Anesthetics. 1. Halogenated Methyl Ethyl Ethers as

Anesthetic Agents", Journal ofMedicinal Chemistry, 14, 517.

Terrell, Speers, SzUr, Uccardi, and Viteha, "General Anesthetics. 3. Fluriitated Methyl Ethyl Ethers as

Anesthetic Agents", Journal ofMedicinal Chemistry, IS, 604-608.

 CE-RM-93-801 COMMENT OR8