alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 361 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 424 

[Report No. 115–487] 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules relating to 

listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming 

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2017 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself, Mr. DUFFY, Ms. CHENEY, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. 

EMMER, Mr. LABRADOR, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. 

HUIZENGA, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. KIND, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. 

WALBERG, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. BERGMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JANUARY 8, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mr. UPTON, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. SESSIONS

JANUARY 8, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 424 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules 

relating to listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great 

Lakes and Wyoming under the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, and for other purposes. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 424 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gray Wolf State Man5 agement Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING GRAY 

7 WOLVES IN THE WESTERN GREAT LAKES. 

8 Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

10 shall reissue the final rule published on December 28, 

11 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 81666), without regard to any other 

12 provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance 

13 of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject to judi14 cial review. 

15 SEC. 3. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING GRAY 

16 WOLVES IN WYOMING. 

17 Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the 

18 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

19 shall reissue the final rule published on September 10, 

20 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 55530), without regard to any other 

21 provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance 

22 of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject to judi23 cial review. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 361 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 424 

[Report No. 115–487] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue 

other purposes. the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming under final rules relating to listing of the gray wolf in 

JANUARY 8, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
53 P.3d 329

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

September 11, 2002

23369

#### State v. Garcia

Affirmed
# C_2008327EN.01001402.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 6 October 2008 — F. Gielen, other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-440/08)

(2008/C 327/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: F. Gielen

Applicant:

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party:

Question referred

Is Article 43 EC to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the application of a provision in a Member State's tax legislation to profits which a national of another Member State (foreign taxable person) has derived from a part of his undertaking operated in the first Member State, if that provision, when interpreted in a particular way, indeed makes a distinction between domestic and foreign taxable persons which — viewed in isolation — is contrary to Article 43 EC, but the foreign taxable person concerned has had an opportunity to opt for treatment as a domestic taxable person and has not done so for reasons of his own?

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5482-S5483]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

                          Enrolled Bill Signed

  The President pro tempore (Mr. Inouye) announced that on today, July 
26, 2012, he had signed the following enrolled bill, previously signed 
by the Speaker of the House:

       S. 1335. An act to amend title 49, United States Code, to 
     provide rights for pilots, and for other purposes.
                                  ____

  At 1:32 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Mrs. Cole, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
passed the following bills, in which it requests the concurrence of the 
Senate:

       H.R. 459. An act to require a full audit of the Board of 
     Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal 
     reserve banks by the Comptroller General of the United 
     States, and for other purposes.
       H.R. 6082. An act to officially replace, within the 60-day 
     Congressional review period under the Outer Continental Shelf 
     Lands Act, President Obama's Proposed Final Outer Continental 
     Shelf Oil & Gas Leasing Program (2012-2017) with a 
     congressional plan that will conduct additional oil and 
     natural gas lease sales to promote offshore energy 
     development, job creation, and increased domestic energy 
     production to ensure a more secure energy future in the 
     United States, and for other purposes.
                                  ____

  At 6:04 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Mrs. Cole, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
agreed to the following concurrent resolution, in which it requests the 
concurrence of the Senate:

       H. Con. Res. 134. Concurrent resolution condemning, in the 
     strongest possible terms, the heinous atrocities that 
     occurred in Aurora, Colorado.

                          Enrolled Bill Signed

  The message further announced that the Speaker has signed the 
following enrolled bill:

       H.R. 5872. An act to require the President to provide a 
     report detailing the sequester

[[Page S5483]]

     required by the Budget Control Act of 2011 on January 2, 
     2013.

  The enrolled bill was subsequently signed by the President pro 
tempore (Mr. Inouye).

                          ____________________
```
#### Alex Faver, Plaintiff, *v.*Thylin Steel Co. Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

January 13, 1959.

*Nathan Gross*for plaintiff.

*Thomas F. Keane*for Thylin Steel Co., Inc., defendant.

*Bivin & Welch*for Willowfodo Nieves, defendant.

Jacob J. Schwabtzwald, J.

Motion for an order directing the defendants to serve upon the attorney for the plaintiff an exact copy of the report or reports of Dr. Leon Singerman, a physician employed by the defendants and who examined the *202plaintiff on the 17th day of October, 1958, is granted as to the defendant Thylin Steel Co. Inc. *(Gooch*v. *Blanch,*14 Misc 2d 396; *Horn*v. *McCarrell,*N. Y. L. J., Dec. 9, 1958, p. 14, col. 6). The court has read with interest the statement of defendant’s counsel, to wit, *“*if the court feels in the interests of justice and expediency such report should be made available to the plaintiff by the defendant then your deponent respectfully requests that any reports of medical examinations had on behalf of the plaintiff by the plaintiff be made available to the defendant.” As is indicated above, the plaintiff is by rule required to give the defendant authority to examine the records of the hospital in which the plaintiff was confined and, also, in seeking a preference under rule 9, the plaintiff is required to submit either a doctor’s affidavit or a copy of the hospital report, so that actually the defendant does get the plaintiff’s doctor’s report and, carrying these rules to their logical conclusion, upon a proper application for specific reports of plaintiff’s doctor, such relief might be granted. The motion is denied as to the defendant Nieves.

As further evidence of the trend in accordance with the above, the court wishes to point out the new rule XII of the New York County Trial Term Rules adopted in the First Department on December 19,1958.

Settle order on notice.
### SERVED: OCTOBER 2, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
. OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF tRANS STATES AIRLINES, LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0907

NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OFPROCEEDING 

### This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012CE030093) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and. other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List -? 

### p 

# ,_ . ,. jo ' 

### ..)SERVICE LIST FDMS No. FAA-2012-0907 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Mr. Richard A. Leach, CEO Trans States Airlines, LLC, 

### Respondent 11495 NavaidRoad, Suite 303 Bridgeton, MO 63044 David J. A. Hayes III, 

### Respondent's Counsel Vice-President & General Counsel Trans States Holdings, Inc. 11495 Navaid Road Bridgeton, MO 63044 TEL: 314-222-4316 FAJ(: 314-222-4311 David B. Kessler, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ACE-7 CentralRegion Federal Aviation Administration Room 506, DOT Building 901 Locust Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3763 FAX: 816-329-3771

1 Service wat;;by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: JiearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430. · 

### -2-The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590. TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 StaffAssistant 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536



### -3-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Cheever, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prism Software
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date") and

         c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  April 14, 2004         /s/ Michael Cheever
                              Michael Cheever, Controller
# C_2009153EN.01001701.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-443/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/13/EC - Limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds - Failure to transpose the concepts of ‘small installation’ and ‘substantial change’)

2009/C 153/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-B. Laignelot, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and A. Adam, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt all the all the laws and regulations necessary to correctly transpose Article 2(3), 2(4) and 4(4) of Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations (OJ 1999 L 85, p. 1) — Concept of ‘small installation’ and ‘substantial change’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to correctly transpose Articles 2(3), 2(4) and 4(4) of Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to correctly transpose Articles 2(3), 2(4) and 4(4) of Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, of 10.1.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5331]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. LEVIN:
       H.R. 15.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The Congress enacts this bill pursuant to Sections 7 & 8 of 
     Article I of the United States Constitution and Amendment XVI 
     of the United States Constitution.
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting 
will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as 
amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Transition to Aging Research Award for Predoctoral Students.
    Date: February 8, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mariel Jais, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue Gateway Bldg., Suite 2E400, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-2614, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c212d3e25292062262d253f0c222524622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503d312239353c7e3a313923103e39387e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28070 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Using a Broker to Import Horses into

the United States

Last Modified: 

Print

Generally, horse owners will enlist the services of a broker/shipping agent to bring a

horse into the United States. While APHIS does not require use of a broker/shipping

agent for importing horses, experienced brokers can be very helpful. 
They coordinate the efforts of airlines, customs brokers, APHIS and other partner

government agencies to ensure the safety of the animals, facilitate clearance of the

shipment, and schedule a timely arrival. These agents are familiar with the

documents and processing associated with import and export regulations.

Some key services an experienced broker/shipping agent can provide include:

Working with the customs agent on your behalf to clear the horses through

Customs and Border Protection requiring security clearance.

Contacting the Animal Import Centers to reserve a space for quarantine at the

pre-determined point of arrival, notifying the Veterinary Services (VS) port of

entry veterinarian of the horses’ arrival, and ensuring payment for services.

Arranging for the horses to be transported from the airport to the quarantine

center. A competent handler should accompany the horses at all times. If a

stallion or mare is being imported for permanent entry, and originates from a

region that APHIS considers to be affected with contagious equine metritis

(CEM), the broker will arrange travel to the USDA-approved state quarantine

location after the Federal quarantine is completed.

Additional services a broker/shipping agent can provide include:

Facilitating safe disposal of waste (manure, bedding, uneaten feed), as well as

cleaning and disinfection of the transport vehicle to avoid contamination of

stabling and transports per APHIS guidance.

Safeguarding the welfare of the horses while in transit, including making sure

the animals receive hay, grain, and a clean water supply.

Ensuring Federal requirements for transiting horses and restricted movement

under the  APHIS seal are followed

Confirming all user fees are paid – both for private costs and APHIS costs,

including testing at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories.

The broker/shipping agent is responsible for planning the travel route, submitting it

to the appropriate veterinary authorities, and identifying emergency layover sites if

needed. They serve as the courier for pre-import blood testing for National

Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL). The broker/shipping agent needs to identify

at least one point of contact along the travel route within the continental United

States in the event of an emergency. If there are any changes to the itinerary, the

importer notifies APHIS in writing a minimum of 15 days prior to the change.
EXHIBIT 10(I)







SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER NON-PLAN COMPENSATION







Non-Employee Directors







The current fees paid to non-employee directors are as follows:







Non-employee directors are each paid a retainer of $60,000, 50% in cash and 50% in the form of restricted stock. The Chairman of the Board of Directors receives an additional $20,000 per year, and the Chairmen of the principal committees receive the following additional amounts for their duties as such; Audit, $10,000, Compensation, $5,000, Nominating and Governance, $5,000. Members of the Audit Committee each receive an additional $2,000 for their duties as such, and the members of the Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees each receive $1,500.







Executive Officers







The current annual salaries of the executive officers are as follows:







Matthew Boyle, President and Chief Executive Officer


-- British pounds 213,700







Paul N. Farquhar, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


-- British pounds 131,200







Annual cash bonuses and any equity awards will be determined at the end of the year.







* * * * *







Further information about compensation of directors and executive officers is found in the Company’s proxy statements on file with the Commission, as well as in periodic Form 8-K filings by the Company.