alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2008 – Cemex Polska v Commission**

**(Case T-203/07)**

Action for annulment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – National allocation plan in respect of emission allowances for Poland for the period from 2008 to 2012 – Decision by the Commission not to raise objections subject to certain conditions – Competence of Member States in the individual allocation of emission allowances – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned
– Criteria (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; European Parliament and Council Directive No 2003/87, Arts 9(1) and (3) and 11(2))
(see paras 22, 28, 44-45)*

2.                     *Environment – Atmospheric pollution – Directive 2003/87 – National allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission
allowances (NAP) – NAP notification procedure (Arts 175 EC and 176 EC; European Parliament and Council Directive No 2003/87,
Arts 9(3), 11(1) and (2)) (see paras 32-39)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1295 final of 26 March 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by the Republic of Poland for the period from 2008 to 2012 in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cemex Polska sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission. |
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Alpha Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Ziegler, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 18, 2016   /s/ Karen Ziegler Karen Ziegler Principal Financial Officer Principal Executive Officer
# C_2010011EN.01001101.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/11

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2009 — HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o., (formerly HP Temporärpersonalgesellschaft mbH) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Manpower Inc.

(Case C-520/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(b), (c), (d) and (g) - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Community word mark I.T.@MANPOWER)

2010/C 11/18

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o., (formerly HP Temporärpersonalgesellschaft mbH) (represented by: represented by M. Ciresa, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Manpower Inc. (represented by: V. Marsland, Solicitor, and A. Bryson, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2008 in Case T-248/05 HUP Uslugi Polska v OHIM — Manpower (I.T.@MANPOWER), by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 5 April 2005 (Case R 124/2004–4), which in turn dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Cancellation Division which had dismissed an application for a declaration of invalidity of Community word mark ‘I.T.@MANPOWER’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 38, 41 and 42 — Trade mark with no descriptive character

HUP Uslugi Polska

OHIM

Manpower

I.T.@MANPOWER

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o. shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o. shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7122]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND PLACE: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will 
be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: Item No. 1: Local Cost Policy.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information, contact: Office of the 
Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-
3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7122 Filed 3-23-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 245 (Friday, December 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88610-88611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-102]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed December 11, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through December 18, 2023 10 a.m. 
EST
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230179, Third Draft Supplemental, USACE, CA, American River 
Common Features, 2016 Flood Risk Management Project, Sacramento, 
California Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent 
Environmental Impact Report XIV, Comment Period Ends: 02/05/2024, 
Contact: Guy Romine 916-496-4646.
EIS No. 20230180, Draft, NRCS, WI, Coon Creek Watershed, Comment Period 
Ends: 02/20/2024, Contact: Joshua Odekirk 262-470-2064.
EIS No. 20230181, Draft, NRCS, WI, West Fork Kickapoo Watershed, 
Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2024, Contact: Joshua Odekirk 262-470-2064.
Amended Notice: EIS No. 20230175, Draft, Caltrans, CA, Last Chance 
Grade Permanent Restoration Project Draft Environmental Impact Report/
Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation, 
Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2024, Contact: Steve Croteau 707-572-7149.


[[Page 88611]]


    Revision to FR Notice Published 12/15/2023; Correction to document 
title at lead agency's request.

    Dated: December 18, 2023.
Julie Smith,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-28249 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### Lancer Insurance Company, Appellant, v Craig Peterson, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Joan A. Peterson, et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for no-fault benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated January 16, 1990, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is granted.

The record reveals that the respondent Craig Peterson was injured while riding on a bus when a fellow passenger bit him. His injuries were the subject of an application for no-fault benefits submitted to the bus company’s insurer, the petitioner Lancer Insurance Company (hereinafter Lancer). After Lancer rejected the request for no-fault benefits, Peterson sought arbitration of the no-fault claim, and Lancer thereupon commenced this proceeding to permanently stay arbitration on *240the ground that no-fault benefits are not available where the injury arises from an assault such as the one involved in this case. The Supreme Court denied the petition. We reverse.

It is well settled that no-fault benefits are unavailable where the injury does not arise "out of the use or operation of a motor vehicle” (Insurance Law § 5102 [b]; *see, Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Campbell],*75 AD2d 645). Hence, no-fault benefits have been denied and arbitration stayed where the accident does not arise from the intrinsic nature of the vehicle and where the vehicle is neither the proximate cause of the accident nor the actual instrumentality which produces the injury *(see, Locascio v Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co.,*127 AD2d 746; *Horney v Tisyl Taxi Corp.,*93 AD2d 291; *Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gholson],*71 AD2d 1004). Inasmuch as the injuries in this case were the product of an intentional assault and the operation of the bus was wholly incidental to the injury-producing event, no-fault benefits are not available. Accordingly, the petition to permanently stay the arbitration should have been granted. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.
AFS-14-034-E April 23, 2014

Exemption No. 10983 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0887

Mr. Robert Cohn Counsel for Republic Airlines, Inc. Hogan Lovells US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004

Dear Mr. Cohn:

This letter is to inform you that we have deni ed your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 15, 2013, you petitioned th e Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Republic Airlines Inc. (Republic) for an exemption from § 121.434(c) of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the ex tent necessary to allow Republic to take credit for 13 hours of initial operating experience (IOE) on EMB-170 aircraft obtained while operating that aircraft type and model under the air carrier operating ce rtificate of Shuttle America Corporation (Shuttle).

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because it does not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Republic.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has dele gated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Republic Airlines Inc. for an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.434(c). In Denial of Exemption No. 10351A (copy enclosed), the FAA wrote that it made clear in Notice 8900.197, regulations do not permit certificate holders to take cr edit for training and evaluation conducted in

accordance with another certificate holder’s approved training program. Notice 8900.197 was incorporated into Order 8900.1 Volume 3, Chapte r 19, Section 1, which applies to both part 1212

and 135 flightcrew member training programs. Specifically, Order 8900.1 states that “a flightcrew member who is employed (directly or by contract) by multiple operators concurrently must complete the applicable training curricula , including recurrent training, for each operator.”

Having reviewed your reasons for re questing an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presente d by the petitioner in th e enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10351A;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying th e enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10351A also apply to the si tuation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, F light Standards Service

Enclosure
Exhibit 23




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements listed below of Gehl Company of our report dated February 14, 2003
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 14, 2003
relating to the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

     1.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-38392)

     2.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-02195)

     3.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-04017)

     4.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-36102)




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 6, 2003
October 2, 2015

Mr. Len Davis

Pure Imagination, Inc.

12 East Wilson Street

Batavia, IL 60510

Dear Mr . Davis :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your June 10, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Pure Imagination Inc., filed

in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2925 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the reques t any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

a t least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70898-70899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29347]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice--AMENDED

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, November 19, 2010; 8:45 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Approval of New Black Panther Party Enforcement Report
     Motion Regarding Healthcare Disparities Report 
Commissioner Statements & Rebuttals
     Consideration of Findings and Recommendations for Briefing 
Report on English-Only in the Workplace
     Update on FY 2011 Cy Pres Enforcement Report & 
Consideration of Project Outline and Discovery Plan
     Consideration of Policy on Commissioner Statements and 
Rebuttals
     Discussion of Possible Briefing Topics for FY 2011
     Update on Status of Briefing on Disparate Impact in School 
Discipline Policies
     Update on Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College 
Admissions--Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in 
closed session

[[Page 70899]]

     Update on Clearinghouse Project
III. State Advisory Committee Issues
     Kentucky SAC
     Maryland SAC
     Vermont SAC
     Wisconsin SAC
     Update on Status of Remaining SACs to Recharter
IV. Management & Operations
     Expiration of Commissioner Terms
V. Approval of Minutes of October 8 Meeting
VI. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-29347 Filed 11-17-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1919-1920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-625]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 18, 2012; 11 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: Compliance Status Report.
    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product

[[Page 1920]]

Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 
504-7923.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-625 Filed 1-10-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-30385),  dated June 30, 1997,  pertaining  to the SUGEN,  Inc. 1992
Stock Option Plan, and in the Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No.  333-37687),
dated  October 10, 1997  pertaining to the  registration  statement of 1,780,000
shares of common stock, of our report dated February 5, 1998 with respect to the
financial  statements of SUGEN,  Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 30, 1998
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 17

- 3478

_____________________________ C OLBY A LLEN S MITH , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

. May 18, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. D ISMISS ED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
W OLF , R OBERTS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Rocco Joseph Carbone, III, of Rocco Joseph Carbone, III, PLLC, St. Augustine , for Petitione r
.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5369]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 RECOGNIZING KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY

 Mr. ISAKSON. Mr. President, today I wish to acknowledge 
Kennesaw State University's annual Homelessness Awareness Week during 
the week of October 8-13, 2012, in my home State of Georgia.
  I appreciate that Kennesaw State University coordinates activities 
throughout the month of October to raise awareness about homeless 
individuals in our society with events such as Homelessness Awareness 
Week. The designation of Homelessness Awareness Week will help to 
increase our knowledge and understanding of those living without 
shelter and food. The activities during this week will also educate 
Georgians on how to address and combat this unfortunate problem in our 
State. Ending homelessness is critical to upholding the vitality of 
families and sense of community in the State of Georgia. Groups, 
organizations, and institutions such as Kennesaw State University work 
to address this growing problem. I support and applaud their efforts 
and urge all citizens to become more knowledgeable about this problem 
and seek out ways to help alleviate this problem and its effects in our 
communities.

                          ____________________
```