alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BST Manufacturing, Inc. 

2013 HAY 30 AM 9:1*8 924 Hawaii Avenue 

Minden, Louisiana 71055-9310 

318-382-1226 Ext. 1020 

22 May 2013 

Document Control Office 

Chemical Control Division (MC 7405M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

Docket: EPA*HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Re: Application for Exemption—TSCA §4(a)(1)(B) Test Rule, 40 CFR 799.5087; HPV 

Second Group Chemicals; Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (CASRN 78-11-5) 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Pursuant to the above-referenced rule, BST Manufacturing, Inc. (BST) hereby submits 

this request for exemption from testing of Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN; CASRN 78-

11-5). This request is being submitted in accordance with a 21 May 2013 telephone 

conversation between John Schaeffer, USEPA, and Michael Meredith, Orica USA. 

In support of our request, we provide the following information as specified in 40 CFR 

790.82 (Content of exemption application): 

1. Testing requirements were published in the Federal Register at 76 FR 1067 in 

which USEPA promulgated a final rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act 

(TSCA) §4(a)(1)(B) on 7 January 2011 (40 CFR 799.5087). PETN (CASRN 78-

11-5) is one of nineteen chemicals listed in Second Group of Chemicals for 

Testing of Certain High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals. 

2. The rule specifies acute toxicity testing of PETN to fish (Pimephales promelas) 

and aquatic invertebrates (Daphnia magna). The principal basis for this 

exemption request is that another party (Dyno Nobel Americas) submitted the 

requisite testing to USEPA in March 2013. 

3. The exemption applicant is: 

BST Manufacturing, Inc. 

924 Hawaii Avenue 

Minden, Louisiana 71055-9310 

318-382-1226 Ext. 1020 

CONTAINS NO CBI 
p. 2 

318-382-1226 Ext 1020 

BST Manufacturing, Inc. 

924 Hawaii Avenue 

Minden, Louisiana 71055-9310 

PAGE 2 

If your agency has any questions or requires further information, please do not hesitate 

to contact the undersigned. 

JarvTSTJavis 

Safety Health & Environmental Manager 

BST Manufacturing, Inc. 

924 Hawaii Avenue 

Minden, Louisiana 71055-9310 

318-382-1226 Ext. 1020 

cc: Mr. John Schaeffer 

Chemical Control Division 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

Sincerely, 

2 
From: (318)382-1226 

Janet Latuso 

ORICAUSA 

924 Hawaii Rd 

Minden, LA 71055 

OrigmlttSHVA ftf ^ 

Exptess 

J13I11302)20336 

SHtPTO: (202)272-0167 B1LLSENDER 

Doc Control-Chem Contr Div MC7405M 

US EPA-Pollution Prevent & toxins 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW 

Ariel Rios Building 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 ^ A^M 

ShpDafe:23MAY13 

ActWgtl.OLB 

CAD: 10388068aiNEr3370 

Delivery Address Bar Code 

Ref# 

Invoice # 

PO# 

Dept# 

7998 3624 8030 

19 RDVA 

FRI-24MAY8:00A 

FBI ~ 24 MAY 8:00A 

FIRST OVERNIGHT 

DSR 

20460 

DC-US 

OCA 

&np# 163787 26HAY13 WASA 519C1/D777/93AB
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Reynaldo Morales v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut

Appellate case number: 01-21-00549-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-54065

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

After dismissing this appeal, the Court denied appellant’s motions for rehearing and for en 

banc reconsideration on June 21, 2022. Mandate issued on September 2, 2022. 

Appellant filed a motion to reinstate on September 2, 2022. Two other documents were 

received from appellant on September 21, 2022 and October 14, 2022.

An appellate court’s plenary power expires 30 days after it overrules all timely filed 

motions for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(b). After plenary 

power expires, an appellate court may not vacate or modify its judgment, but it may correct a 

clerical error in its judgment or opinion, issue and its recall mandate as provided by the rules, 

enforce or suspend enforcement of its judgment as provided by law, order or modify the amount 

and type of security required to suspend a judgment, decide sufficiency of the sureties under rule 

24, and order its opinion published. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3. 

Because our mandate issued on September 2, 2022, the Court lacks plenary power to take 

any further action in this case on the motion filed on September 2, 2022. Future filings, if any,

will be marked as filed, but no action will be taken. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Justice Richard Hightower______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 22, 2022_____
# C_2008183EN.01001201.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België lodged on 21 April 2008 — Draka NK Cables Ltd, AB Sandvik International, VO Sembodja BV and Parc Healthcare International Limited v Omnipol Ltd

(Case C-167/08)

(2008/C 183/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Draka NK Cables Ltd, AB Sandvik International, VO Sembodja BV and Parc Healthcare International Limited

Applicant:

Defendant: Omnipol Ltd

Defendant:

Question referred

Is a creditor who pursues a claim in the name and for the account of his debtor a party within the meaning of Article 43(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 (1), that is, a party who can lodge an appeal against a decision on the request for declaration of enforceability, even if he has not formally appeared as a party in the proceedings in which another creditor of that debtor applied for that declaration?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
#### Armanda Ybarra et al., Plaintiffs, v Dennis D. Crowley, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Barbara A. Wheeler, Intervenor-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Tetro v Plainview-Old Bethpage Cent. School Dist.,*99 AD2d 814). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Robbins, J. — Renewal.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.6



                              POWER OF ATTORNEY





         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned officer and/or 
director of ANTEC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
which is about to file an annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended on Form 10-K, hereby constitutes
and appoints Lawrence A. Margolis, Daniel J. Distel and James E. Knox and each
of them his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agents, with full power
and all capacities, to sign the Corporation's Form 10-K and any and all
amendments thereto, and any other documents in connection therewith, to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as she or he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.
        
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his or her hand 
and seal as of the 20th day of March, 1998.



                                                /s/ James L. Faust
                                                   ---------------------        
                                                   James L. Faust
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4338 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to furnish urns for the remains of certain veterans whose remains 

are placed in non-traditional resting sites. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Ms. TENNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish urns for the 

remains of certain veterans whose remains are placed 

in non-traditional resting sites. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chuck Osier Burial 

5 Benefits Act’’. 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4338 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION 

2 OF URNS FOR REMAINS OF CERTAIN VET3 ERANS WHOSE REMAINS ARE PLACED IN 

4 NON-TRADITIONAL RESTING SITES. 

5 Section 2306(d) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(6)(A) In lieu of furnishing a headstone or marker 

9 under this subsection to a deceased individual described 

10 in subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall furnish, upon re11 quest and at the expense of the United States— 

12 ‘‘(i) an urn made of any material to signify the 

13 individual’s status as a veteran, in which the re14 mains of such individual may be placed at private 

15 expense; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) a commemorative plaque signifying the in17 dividual’s status as a veteran. 

18 ‘‘(B) A deceased individual described in this sub19 section is an individual— 

20 ‘‘(i) who served in the Armed Forces on or after 

21 April 6, 1917; 

22 ‘‘(ii) who is eligible for a headstone or marker 

23 furnished under paragraph (1) (or would be so eligi24 ble but for the date of the death of the individual); 

25 and 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4338 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) whose remains were cremated and are 

2 placed in a non-traditional resting site. 

3 ‘‘(C) In this paragraph, the term ‘non-traditional 

4 resting site’ means a site of interment or inurnment other 

5 than a national cemetery, a State veterans’ cemetery, a 

6 tribal cemetery, or a private cemetery.’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ted Turcotte, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 4th Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment (this “Amendment”) effective as of the 1st day of January, 2017 to the Employment Agreement, initially effective as of April 5, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Heat Biologics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Ann Rosar (“Executive”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned in the Employment Agreement.  




WHEREAS, Executive was retained under the Employment Agreement by the Corporation to serve as its Vice President of Finance, Controller and Secretary; and 




WHEREAS, in recognition of the hard work and performance by Executive, the Corporation desires to amend the Employment Agreement. 




NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual promises contained herein and for ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 




1. Amendment. Section 3(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:




“(i)  Executive shall receive an annual base salary of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) for the Term (the “Base Salary”), payable semi-monthly, which Base Salary may be reviewed and increased on an annual basis by the Board or a committee thereof to reflect the rate of inflation in effect at such time.”




2. Severability. The provisions of this Amendment are severable and if any part or it is found to be unenforceable the other paragraphs shall remain fully valid and enforceable. 




3. No Other Amendments; Confirmation. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof. 




4. Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but both of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




5. Governing Law. This Amendment is made and shall be construed and performed under the laws of the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue to be valid and enforceable. State of North Carolina without regard to its choice or conflict of law principles and the parties agree to North Carolina as the exclusive venue for any disputes arising hereunder. 







[Signature page follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Ms. Rosar’s Employment Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. 




			
	 
	 
	 

	 

	HEAT BIOLOGICS, INC.


	 

	 

	 


	 

	By: 

	/s/ Jeffrey Wolf


	 

	Name: 

	Jeffrey Wolf


	 

	Title: 

	Chief Executive Officer


	 

	 

	 


	 

	/s/ Ann Rosar


	 

	ANN ROSAR
Order entered December 20, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01171

- CV

AMY ROBILIO REED AND AMY ROBILIO REED, P LLC, Appellant s

V.

CENTURION TERMINALS, LLC AN D CENTURION PECOS TE RMINAL, LLC,

Appellee s

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 06689



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellees’ December 19, 2018 unopposed motion for extension of

time to file thei r brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due February 4, 2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5329]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will lead the House in the Pledge 
of Allegiance.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Pensacola Aviation Center, LLC, Complainant



### v.
Pensacola International Airport, City of Pensacola, 

### FL Respondent ) ) ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) FAA Docket No. 16-12-12



### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, 

### § 16.11 (a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before April, 21 2016.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January72!!} 2016, I served via Certified mail a true copy ofthe FAA's Notice of Extension ofTime , addressed to:

Counsel for Complainant: Leonard D. Kirsch , Esq. McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jericho , New York 11753 Tel: (516) 364

- 1095 Fax: (516) 364-0612

Counsel for Re s pondent: Robert J. Williams, Esq. Schnader Harri son Segal & Lewis , LLP Fifth A venue Place 120 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2700 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 Tel: (412) 577-5223 Fax: (412) 765-3858

Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis , (AC0-100)

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 1 1 8

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 8 A M

T o : c p e c k @ f l y i n g m e d i a

. n e t

D e a r M r

. P e c k :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 1 1 8 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

D e s c r i b e t h e a i r c r a f

t m a k e ( s )

, m o d e l ( s )

, a n d t

y p e ( s ) ( i

. e

. , f i x e d

‐ w i n g

, r o t o r c r a f t

, l i g h t e r

‐ t h a n

‐ a i r ) f

o r t h e

p r o p o s e d U A S o p e r a t i o n

. T h e d e s c r i p t i o n ( s ) s h o u l d i n c l u d e t h e m a x i m u m w e i g h t ( i n c l u d i n g p a y l o a d )

. T h i s

i n f o r m a t i o n c a n b e l o c a t e d i n t h e a i r c r a f t m a n u a l ( s )

.



### P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t

e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y o u r i n t

e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t

e d

r e s p o n s e d a t

e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 1 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 19, 2004
/s/ John P. Manning   
John P. Manning 
Principal Executive Officer
Silicon Valley Bank

Modification Agreement

Borrower:   Exabyte Corporation
Address:     1685 38th Street
                   Boulder, Colorado 80301
Date:           As of February 14, 2003

THIS MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

The parties agree to amend the Loan and Security Agreement between them, dated June 18, 2002 (the "Loan Agreement"), as follows, effective as of the date hereof. (Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Modification Agreement, shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement.)

1.       Amended and Restated Schedule. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Silicon and Borrower hereby modify the Loan Agreement by deleting in its entirety the Schedule to the Loan Agreement and replacing such Schedule with the Amended and Restated Schedule attached hereto. Effective as of the date of this Modification Agreement, the Amended and Restated Schedule shall be incorporated in and become a part of the Loan Agreement.

2.        Representations True. Borrower represents and warrants to Silicon that all representations and warranties set forth in the Loan Agreement, as amended hereby, are true and correct.

3.        General Provisions.This Modification Agreement, the Loan Agreement, any prior written amendments to the Loan Agreement signed by Silicon and Borrower, and the other written documents and agreements between Silicon and Borrower set forth in full all of the representations and agreements of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior discussions, representations, agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to the subject hereof.

4.        Loan Agreement Remains in Full Force and Effect. Except as herein expressly amended, all of the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement, and all other documents and agreements between Silicon and Borrower shall continue in full force and effect and the same are hereby ratified and confirmed.

|Borrower:                    |  | Silicon:           
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------
|EXABYTE CORPORATION          |  | SILICON VALLEY BANK
|                             |  |                    
|By /s/ Tom W. Ward           |  | By                 
|President or Vice President  |  | Title              
|                             |  |                    
|By /s/ Amy J. Perius         |  |                    
|Secretary or Ass't Secretary |  |                    

00008804.doc