alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the Annual  Report of Sweetheart  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending  September 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Dennis Mehiel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with  the  requirements  of  section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Dennis Mehiel

-----------------
Dennis Mehiel
Chief Executive Officer
December 9, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compacts between several Tribes in California and the State of California.

# DATES:

The extension takes effect December 22, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov;*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The following Tribes and the State of California have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compacts to December 31, 2024: the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, California; the Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians of California; the Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria, California; the Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria; the Cahuilla Band of Indians; the Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation, California; the Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, California; and the Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation, California. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compacts.

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-28198 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4406 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 459
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4406

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 14, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, as the ``Tuskegee Airmen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tuskegee Airmen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tuskegee 
Airmen Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 459

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, as the ``Tuskegee Airmen 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 14, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
Registration Statements No. 333-15469 (Form S-3); No. 333-21127 (Form S-3); No.
333-06793 (Form S-3); No. 333-16995 (Form S-3); No. 333-29825 (Form S-3) and
No. 333-26611 (Form S-8) and to the incorporation by reference therein of our
report dated March 5, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of SFX Broadcasting, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and
1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997.




                                                /s/Ernst & Young LLP



New York, New York
March 16, 1998
# C_2008236EN.01001101.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Ischia (Italy) lodged on 15 July 2008 — Lucia Anna Giorgia Iacono v Telecom Italia SpA

(Case C-319/08)

(2008/C 236/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di Pace di Ischia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lucia Anna Giorgia Iacono

Applicant:

Defendant: Telecom Italia SpA

Defendant:

Question referred

Do the Community rules in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Directive 2002/22/EC (1), Directive 1999/44/EC (2), Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC (3) and Directive 1998/257/EC (4) have direct effect and must they be interpreted as meaning that disputes ‘in the area of electronic communications between end-users and operators concerning non-compliance with the rules on universal service and on the rights of end-users, as laid down in legislation, decisions of the Regulatory Authority, contractual terms and service charters’ (the disputes contemplated by Article 2 of Decision No 173/07/CONS of the Regulatory Authority) must not be made subject to a mandatory attempt at conciliation without which proceedings in that regard may not be brought before the courts, thus taking precedence over the rule laid down in Article 3(1) of Decision No 173/07/CONS?

1

2

3

4

in the area of electronic communications between end-users and operators concerning non-compliance with the rules on universal service and on the rights of end-users, as laid down in legislation, decisions of the Regulatory Authority, contractual terms and service charters

---

(1)  OJ L 108, p. 51.

1

(2)  OJ L 171, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Recommendation.

3

(4)  Commission Recommendation.

4

---
# C_2021138EN.01000901.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Bartosch Airport Supply Services GmbH v Zollamt Wien

(Case C-772/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Tariff heading 8701 and Tariff heading 8705 - Interpretation - Aircraft tractor)

(2021/C 138/11)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bartosch Airport Supply Services GmbH

Defendant: Zollamt Wien

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016, must be interpreted as meaning that heading 8705 of that nomenclature does not cover vehicles designed to tow and push aircraft, referred to as ‘aircraft tractors’, since those aircraft tractors fall within heading 8701 of that nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
# C_2009006EN.01001502.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/15

---

Action brought on 12 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-490/08)

(2009/C 6/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC and 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC (1) or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC and 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC (1) or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2005/68/EC expired on 10 December 2007. At the date of bringing the present action, the defendant had still not adopted the necessary transposing measures or, in any event, had not yet communicated them to the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 323, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2022002EN.01000302.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2021 — Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission

(Case C-650/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument - Decentralised management - Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - On-the-spot checks - Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 - Article 7 - Access to computer data - Digital forensic operation - Legitimate expectations - Right to be heard - Non-material damage)

(2022/C 2/04)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Vialto Consulting Kft. (represented by: D. Sigalas and S. Paliou, dikigoroi)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, J. Baquero Cruz and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2019, Vialto Consulting v Commission (T-617/17, not published, EU:T:2019:446) in so far as it rejected as unfounded the complaint raised by Vialto Consulting Kft. concerning the European Commission’s infringement of the right to be heard; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2019, Vialto Consulting v Commission (T-617/17, not published, EU:T:2019:446) in so far as it rejected as unfounded the complaint raised by Vialto Consulting Kft. concerning the European Commission’s infringement of the right to be heard;

| 2. | Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;

| 3. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for a ruling on the conditions for incurring the non-contractual liability of the European Union relating to the existence of a causal link between the infringement by the European Commission of the right to be heard and the damage complained of, as well as the fact of damage; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for a ruling on the conditions for incurring the non-contractual liability of the European Union relating to the existence of a causal link between the infringement by the European Commission of the right to be heard and the damage complained of, as well as the fact of damage;

| 4. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Tripp, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), both rendered March 16, 1989, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment Number 11257/ 87, and robbery in the second degree under Indictment Number 180/88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

*298We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80081, 333-33130, 333-47388, 333-70620, 333-98135, 333-108345 and 333-152164) of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 2009 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                                 
|San Jose, California             
|March 20, 2009
# C_2009069EN.01001601.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/16

---

Action brought on 25 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-424/08)

(2009/C 69/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Schima and B. Sipos, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, inasmuch as the competent German authorities have failed to draw up external emergency plans for all establishments to which Article 9 of the said Directive applies; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, inasmuch as the competent German authorities have failed to draw up external emergency plans for all establishments to which Article 9 of the said Directive applies;

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 11(1)(c) of Directive 96/82/EC requires Member States to ensure that, for all establishments to which Article 9 applies, the competent authorities draw up an external emergency plan for the measures to be taken outside the establishment. The external emergency plans must contain not only information concerning remedial measures on-site and off-site, but also specific information for the public concerning the accident and the requisite behaviour to be adopted. In addition, the information intended for the emergency services of other Member States in the case of a major accident which is capable of causing transboundary effects must also appear in the external emergency plans.

The present action seeks a declaration that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of Directive 96/82/EC, inasmuch as it has failed to draw up external emergency plans for all establishments to which Article 9 of the said Directive applies.

---
# CHAMBER of COMMERCE OF THE PALM BEACHES
RESOLUTION
Calling on Secretary ofTransportation Anthony Foxx and Secretary ofState John Kerry to begin Open Skies consultations with the governments ofQatar and the United Arab Emirates in order to restore fair market principles and to address unfair subsidies provided to their state-owned airlines. WHEREAS, for decades Open Skies agreements have brought great benefits to U.S
.travelers, U.S
. airlines and the U.S. economy by creating a framework for competitive, fair market air travel between countries; and WHEREAS, U.S. airlines support 11 million Americanjobs and $1.5 trillion in nationwide economic activity; and WHEREAS, the nations ofQatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have violated Open Skiespolicy by funneling $42 billion in government subsidies and otherunfair benefits to their state-owned airlines (Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline), distorting the international aviation market and undermining fair competition; and WHEREAS, these subsidies pose a direct threat to the U.S. airline industry and thousands ofAmericanjobs including an average of 821 jobs per each roundtrip flight lost to these carriers; therefore, let it be RESOLVED, that the Chamber ofCommerce ofthe Palm Beaches urges the U.S. government to initiate consultations with Qatar and the UAE as provided for within Open Skies agreements to address this issue; we also ask the U.S. government to request a freeze on new capacity from the Gulf carriers to the U
.S
. while these consultations are going forward.



### Date: 

# Apri/J<t J,a

# L 5
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D791]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No hearings were held.

Joint Meetings
  No joint committee meetings were held.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's Financial  Statements for the period ending December 31, 1996 included
in the  Company's  Form  10-KSB  filed March 31,  1997 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                          8,161
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   6,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      467
<INVENTORY>                                                     3,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               18,850
<PP&E>                                                          3,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  2,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 22,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           5,687
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       23,698
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   22,387
<SALES>                                                        32,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               32,725
<CGS>                                                          15,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  15,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               15,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               (341)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 2,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (3,356)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             5,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    5,643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    1.20


</TABLE>