alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**1. Newsletter Article/Blog Post**

**Please Don’t Move the Tamarisk Leaf Beetle**

Have you heard of the endangered southwest willow flycatcher? It’s a bird that nests and feeds in dense forests of willow and non-native saltcedar (tamarisk trees) along southwestern rivers. Many organizations are working to promote its conservation, including USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).

APHIS is urging landowners and land managers not to move tamarisk leaf beetles onto their properties to control saltcedar. Releasing this beetle may harm habitat critical to the flycatcher and other native wildlife. In addition, people who move the beetle interstate without a permit from APHIS may violate the Plant Protection Act—and potentially face financial penalties.

Fortunately, there are ways to control saltcedar without using tamarisk leaf beetles, and USDA has resources to help. If you are a landowner or lease holder, APHIS encourages you to work with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service’s Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW) partnership. This program may be able to help you control saltcedar while conserving vital habitat for the flycatcher.

If you have planted or use saltcedar for landscaping purposes and wish to protect those trees from the beetle, discuss potential pest management options with your local Extension agent. To find an Extension office in your State, visit USDA’s Land-Grant University Website Directory and click on your State on the map. In addition, if you have concerns about wildfire risk that dead trees on your property may pose, you may wish to contact your local wildfire response organization for assistance and information.

Remember: You have the power to protect America’s landscapes and help conserve this endangered species! Take action, but please don’t move the tamarisk leaf beetle.

**2. Facebook Posts**

If you own or manage land in the Southwest near a river, you may be trying to control saltcedar (tamarisk trees). USDA has valuable information and resources to help you control saltcedar while protecting an endangered bird’s critical habitat. www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/tlb

Don’t move the tamarisk leaf beetle onto your property to control saltcedar (tamarisk trees)! Doing so may harm critical habitat of the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher. Fortunately, USDA has alternatives. Learn more here: www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/tlb

**3. Tweets**

The endangered southwestern willow flycatcher can nest in saltcedar (tamarisk trees). @USDA_APHIS can help you control saltcedar on your property while protecting this bird’s habitat: www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/tlb

Southwest land owners and managers: Don’t move this beetle to control saltcedar (tamarisk trees)! It can harm the critical habitat of an endangered bird. @USDA_APHIS has alternatives: www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/tlb

Page 1 of 2

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5689]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    NO TAX CUT FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS

  (Ms. HANABUSA asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Ms. HANABUSA. Mr. Speaker, you have controlled the House for 19 
months. The Republican majority has simply failed to lead. And more 
importantly, you are incapable of governing for the middle class--the 
middle class, the people who help build this great Nation. This week we 
had the opportunity to provide a tax cut for 100 percent of these 
Americans, those individuals earning less than $200,000 and less than 
$250,000 for a family. But once again, the Republican majority wanted 
it their way.
  And what was your way? You wanted to pass tax breaks for millionaires 
and billionaires, your friends. And what does that do? It adds $1 
trillion to our deficit and debt over the next 10 years. How many times 
has the majority said time and time again about the deficit and debt. 
And what do you do? You pass the tax cuts that are going to add $1 
trillion.
  Mr. Speaker, it's about time that we step back and we realize that we 
are here to serve and the fact that we must take care of the majority, 
the wonderful middle class.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 1996 and the
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         4100286
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1925981
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               3000000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   18510478
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          634340
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            634340
<LOANS>                                      102691740
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1486873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               134162166
<DEPOSITS>                                   117805395
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2311047
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1408826
<LONG-TERM>                                    1000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1334409
<OTHER-SE>                                    10302489
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                11636898
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8923573
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1270161
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                352971
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              10546705
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4752790
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4963803
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5582902
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   516100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4401372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1645774
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1645774
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1001774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.81
<LOANS-NON>                                     110000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    200000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1067584
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   386515
<RECOVERIES>                                    232704
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1486873
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1486873
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2020414EN.01002601.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/26

---

Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 4 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra — Spain) — D.A.T.A., L.F.A., A.M.A.G., L.F.A., J.G.C., S.C.C., A.C.V., A.A.G., A.C.A., L.C.A., N.P.B., P.C.A. v Ryanair D.A.C.

(Case C-827/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/39)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Grand Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of AMFM Operating Inc. (the "Issuer"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: March 26, 2004


By: /s/ RANDALL T. MAYS
    --------------------------
Name: Randall T. Mays
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Performance Food Group Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.   333-78229,  333-12223  and  33-72400)  on  Form  S-8  and   the
registration statements (Nos. 333-68877 and 333-24679) on Form  S-4  of
Performance Food Group Company of our reports dated February  7,  2000,
relating  to the consolidated balance sheets of Performance Food  Group
Company and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2000 and January 2, 1999, the
related  consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity  and
cash  flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
January  1,  2000, and the related financial statement schedule,  which
reports are included in this Form 10-K.


                                   /s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 29, 2000
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5634]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 TAXES

  (Mr. PALAZZO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. PALAZZO. Mr. Speaker, I'm a CPA by trade. I've spent many years 
in my former life wading through volumes of Tax Code trying to ensure 
my clients followed every last letter of the law while also trying to 
ensure they don't get stuck paying more taxes than they owe. But the 
American people and the people of south Mississippi don't need a CPA to 
tell them that we need a simpler, fairer, and flatter Tax Code.
  Last week, the U.S. Senate sent a strong message when it voted to 
raise taxes on small businesses and families. In south Mississippi 
alone, the proposed tax hikes would increase taxes by an average of 
$2,200 per family. That's a total of more than $723 million more that 
south Mississippians would have to pay.
  In addition to that extra tax burden, a recent study from Ernst & 
Young shows that we could lose as many as 710,000 jobs, and wages could 
decrease by almost 2 percent.
  Now, I'm no rocket scientist, but I'm pretty sure that the American 
people and the people of south Mississippi don't need a rocket 
scientist to tell them that these tax hikes are the last thing we need 
right now. That's why the House stepped forward yesterday and passed 
legislation to stop the tax hike, and that's why we're committed to 
continue working on tax reform to make our Tax Code simpler, fairer, 
and flatter for all Americans.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 245 (Friday, December 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Notice of Recurrence; Correction

ACTION: Notice of availability; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL) is correcting a notice that 
appeared in the Federal Register on December 6, 2023. After publication 
of the notice, the DOL discovered that the synopsis of the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) provided in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section incorrectly summarized the subject matter of the collection. 
DOL is issuing this correction to provide the correct synopsis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Neary by telephone at 202-
693-6312, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6e6566757a786b757a7f686663696a4e4546044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51151e1d0e0103100e0104131d181211353e3d7f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In FR. Doc. 2023-26748 appearing at 88 FR 84834 in the Federal 
Register of Wednesday, December 6, 2023, on page 84834, in the second 
column, the following correction is made:
    1. In the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, correct the first 
paragraph to read as follows: This form is used by current, or 
occasionally former, Federal employees to claim wage loss or medical 
treatment resulting from a recurrence of a work-related injury while 
Federally employed. The information is necessary to ensure the accurate 
payment of benefits. For additional substantive information about this 
ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on 
August, 7, 2023 (88 FR 52214).

Michelle Neary,
Senior PRA Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2023-28219 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-CH-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1221

In Re: KAMRAN TAVAKOLI-NOURI,

Debtor.

______________________________

KAMRAN TAVAKOLI-NOURI, a/k/a Mohammed K.

Tavakoli-Nouri, a/k/a Kamran Nouri,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER; PAUL J. WEBER,

Defendants - Appellees,

GEORGE W. LIEBMANN; OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE,

Trustees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-

3971-AMD, BK-96-52136-JFS)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Edward Rubin,

RUBIN & RUBIN, P.C., Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming

the bankruptcy court's order denying his various motions. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Tavakoli-Nouri v. Washington Hosp., Nos. CA-96-

3971-AMD; BK-96-52136-JFS (D. Md. Jan. 10 & 23, 1997). Additionally, we deny the Appellant's motion for production of a transcript

at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2015 10:37 AM

To: Culligan, Kevin; McCabe, Janet; Tsirigotis, Peter; Harvey, Reid; Vasu, Amy; Hutson, Nick; Fruh, Steve; Jones, Toni

Cc: Shelanski, Howard; Mancini, Dominic J.

Subject: Concluding Review Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Clean Power Plan Rules

Hello everyone,

I am writing to inform you that OIRA has officially concluded its review under EO 12866 and 13563 of the following three EPA rules:

2060-AQ91 Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

2060-AR33 Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

2060-AS47 Federal Plan for Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Electric Generating Units

Thank you to everyone and your teams for a tr emendous job well done on these important rules.

All the best,

Nathan
#### Guy A. CURRY, Administrator of the Estate of Tessa Loudermilk, Plaintiff in Error, v. Artie Mae HAYNES, Franklin Eugene Bryce, and Longbell Lumber Company, a Corporation, Defendants in Error.

No. 37803.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 10, 1958.

*817Trower, Ferguson & Gaither, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Sanders & McElroy, Tulsa, for defendants in error.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal by petition in error with case-made attached from a judgment of the District Court of Tulsa County, wherein defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained. Motion for a new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given, and on April 11, 19S7, the case-made was settled by the trial judge. The petition in error with case-made attached was not filed in this court until May 3, 1957, more than 20 days after the case-made was settled.

Our statute, 12 O.S.1955 Supp. Sec. 972, requires that proceedings by case-made for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments or final orders be commenced within 20 days from the date the case-made is settled, and where the case-made and petition in error are not filed in this court within 20 days from the date the case-made is settled, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and will dismiss the same. Jordan v. Snakard, Okl., 320 P.2d 396; Smith v. Independent School District Number Sixteen, Okl., 321 P.2d 430; Video Independent Theatres, Inc., v. Walker, Okl., 308 P.2d 958. As this court is without jurisdiction it is our duty to dismiss the appeal. Albert v. Card, Okl., 317 P.2d 766; Video Independent Theatres, Inc., v. Walker, supra ; Long v. McMahan, 205 Okl. 696, 241 P.2d 185.

Appeal dismissed.

WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
# C_2010209EN.01000602.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-487/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Free movement of capital - Articles 56 EC and 40 of the EEA Agreement - Difference in treatment - Dividends distributed to resident and non-resident companies)

2010/C 209/08

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and I. Martinez del Peral, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 56 EC and 40 EEA — Different treatment given to dividends distributed to domestic and foreign shareholders

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by making the exemption of dividends distributed by companies resident in Spain subject to a level of holding by the recipient companies in the distributing companies which is higher for recipient companies residing in another Member State than for recipient companies resident in Spain, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56(1) EC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by making the exemption of dividends distributed by companies resident in Spain subject to a level of holding by the recipient companies in the distributing companies which is higher for recipient companies residing in another Member State than for recipient companies resident in Spain, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56(1) EC.

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5658]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS

  The following concurrent resolutions and Senate resolutions were 
read, and referred (or acted upon), as indicated:

           By Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Casey, Mr. 
             Blumenthal, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. 
             Akaka, and Mr. Kohl):
       S. Res. 533. A resolution designating October 2012 as 
     ``National Work and Family Month''; considered and agreed to.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 10.60**

 

September 28,2005

 

 

ThomasGillespie

LockhartChemical

 

DearTom,

 

TheBoard approved the settlement we discussed on Monday for the $68,380.11 formanufacturing invoices owed to Lockhart by Polar.

 

1.The $68,380.11 is to be reduced by $5,000, Poles approximate cost for thePowerRight shipment to China. (The shipment was ultimately rejected byPowerRight.)

 

2.The balance of $63,380.11 is to be paid in full with Polar 144 common stock at$.05 per share, for a total of 1,307,603 shares.

 

3.Lockhart agrees that the shares will be voted by Mark Nelson pursuant to theVoting Agreement that Lockhart previously entered into.

 

4.Lockhart will return the check it is holding for $20,384.10 and will processthe Harley Davidson order.

 

Polar’saccount with Lockhart is fully paid as of this date.

 

Tom,if you agree with this understanding, please sign the acknowledgement below,and we will forward the Polar shares to you immediately.

 
| Sincerely,                   |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/  Mark L. Nelson          |   |
| Mark  L. Nelson              |
|                         |
| AGREED &  ACCEPTED: |
|                         |
| /s/  Thomas Gillespie        |   |
| Thomas  Gillespie            |
| Lockhart  Chemical           |
|                              |  |  |

 

----
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption

                        On December 20, 2017, by Executive Order 13818, the President declared a national emergency with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world and, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*), took related steps to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.                    

The prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on December 20, 2017, must continue in effect beyond December 20, 2023. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-28106

Billing code 3395-F4-P