alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGELLAN
TECHNOLOGY, INC. DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          88,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,812
<PP&E>                                          72,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,629,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,724
<OTHER-SE>                                     926,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,629,352
<SALES>                                      1,150,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,150,046
<CGS>                                          742,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,932,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,921,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,921,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,921,379)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do
hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: September 4,
      2008 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE            
|------------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                               | Todd E. Wille                
|                               | Chief Executive
      Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
# C_2009282EN.01001103.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-252/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Pollution and nuisance - Combustion plants - Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air)

2009/C 282/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and A. Alcover San Pedro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: S. Camilleri, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(1) in conjunction with Annexes IV A, VI A and VII A, and of Article 12 in conjunction with Annexe VIII A.2 of Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants (OJ 2001 L 309, p. 1) — Non-compliance with the emission limit values laid down in respect of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and dust — Delimara and Marsa installations

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing correctly to apply Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants in relation to the operation of the Phase One steam plant of the Delimara and Marsa power stations, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(1) and 12 of that directive in conjunction with Part A of Annex IV, Part A of Annex VI, Part A of Annex VII and Part A.2 of Annex VIII thereto; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing correctly to apply Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants in relation to the operation of the Phase One steam plant of the Delimara and Marsa power stations, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(1) and 12 of that directive in conjunction with Part A of Annex IV, Part A of Annex VI, Part A of Annex VII and Part A.2 of Annex VIII thereto;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 197, 2.08.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the periods reflected therein.



/s/ Colin Binny
-------------------------------------
President, CEO & CFO
July 31, 2007


                                       13
**Exhibit 10.58**

 

 

April20, 2000

 

Dr.Steven L. Stice

ADSComplex 

Universityof Georgia 

Athens,GA 30602

 

 

Re:      Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (“ACT”)

 

DearSteve:

 

Thisletter is to confirm, in accordance with that certain Letter Agreement datedJuly 2, 1998 (as amended by the Extension of Letter Agreement dated September15, 1998) between you and ACT, and as agreed in our recent discussionsregarding said Letter Agreement, that in consideration of your agreement tocontinue your employment with ACT during the summer of 1998 and ACT’s paymentto you of the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00), plusinterest at the rate of 8.25% from October 15, 1998 to April 14, 2000,you relinquish, and assign to ACT, all of your rights and/or claims to equityinterests of any form now or previously existing in ACT, CIMA Biotechnology,Inc. and Cyagra, LLC.

 

Pleaseacknowledge and confirm your understanding and acceptance of the foregoing bysigning this letter where indicated below and returning it to me. Upon receiptof the signed letter we will deliver to you our check in the amount of ThreeHundred Thirty-Nine Thousand, Three Hundred and Seventy Six Dollars andThirteen Cents ($339,376.13).

 

Thankyou for your cooperation regarding this matter. 

 

Verytruly yours,

 
| ADVANCED  CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.                        |                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                                   |                 |
|                                                   |                 |
| By:                                                    | /s/ Michael  D. West |   |   |
| Printed  Name: Michael D. West, Ph.D.                  |                 |
| Its:  President  and Chief Executive Officer |                 |
|                                                   |                 |
|                                                   | SEEN  AND AGREED TO: |
|                                                   |                 |
|                                                   |                 |
|                                                   | /s/  Steven L. Stice |   |
|                                                   | Steven  L. Stice     |
|                                                        |                      |  |  |  |

 

----
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 16 , 201 5
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00126

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 00127

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 00128

- CR NO. 14

- 15

- 0012 9

- CR

JOSEPH HOENINGHAUS , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1405266 , 1405276 , 1428986 and 1428987

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a guilty plea to (1) burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit theft; (2) possession of methamphetamine; (3) burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit theft; and (4) unauthorized use of a vehicle. In each case, in accor dance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the2 trial court sentenced appellant on May 22, 2014, to confinement for nine years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The sentences were ordered to ru n concurrently. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case. We dismiss ed the appeals. See Hoeninghaus v. State, 14

- 14

- 00543

- CR, 2014 WL 3843837 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 5, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication). On February 2, 2015, appellant filed another notice of appeal in each of the same trial court cause numbers. The exclusive post

- conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus p ursuant to Tex. Code Crim. P. art. 11.07. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). A post

- conviction writ must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals, not this court. According, these appeals are dismissed for want of j urisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally and Donovan

. Do Not Publish

– Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
20925

#### State v. Santos

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4358 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4358

     To require the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to report on 
 applications for tax credits under the low-income housing tax credit 
   program that, in the preceding fiscal year, were approved but not 
                               allocated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2017

Mr. Lewis of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to report on 
 applications for tax credits under the low-income housing tax credit 
   program that, in the preceding fiscal year, were approved but not 
                               allocated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Missed Opportunities in Low Income 
Housing Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON APPLICATIONS FOR LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT 
              PROGRAM THAT WERE APPROVED BUT NOT ALLOCATED.

    (a) In General.--Not later than December 31 of each fiscal year, 
the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service shall submit a report 
to the Congress on applications for tax credits under the low-income 
housing tax credit program that, in the preceding fiscal year, were 
approved but not allocated credits.
    (b) Contents.--Each report required by subsection (a) shall specify 
each of the following:
            (1) The number of applications for tax credits under the 
        low-income housing tax credit program that were approved by 
        State Housing Finance Agencies but not allocated credits.
            (2) The total number of apartment buildings, apartment 
        units, single family dwellings, duplexes, and townhouses 
        proposed in applications that were approved by State Housing 
        Finance Agencies but did not receive an allocation of low-
        income housing tax credit program credits.
            (3) The total number of people who could have taken 
        residency in units proposed by approved applications that did 
        not receive tax credits.
    (c) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) The term ``low-income housing tax credit program'' 
        means the low-income housing tax credit program as authorized 
        under section 252 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 to provide an 
        incentive for the development and rehabilitation of affordable 
        rental housing.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40355

FROST NATIONAL BANK OF 

SAN ANTONIO, as Trustee of 

the Ruth Chapman Cowles and 

Andrew G. Cowles Charitable 

Trust; SHARON J. BELL, as CoTrustee of the Ruth Chapman Cowles 

and Andrew G. Cowles Memorial Trust; 

BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

as Co-Trustee of the Ruth Chapman Cowles 

and Andrew G. Cowles Memorial Trust; 

VICTORIA BANK & trust, as Trustee of 

the Trust of the Benefit of Leta Mae 

Hight and her Descendants; DOUGLAS 

BURGESS, as Trustee of the Hight 

Revocable Trust; MARGARET HIGHT; JOHN 

O. CHAPMAN, JR., Individually and as 

Trustee of the John O. Chapman Trust; 

JANE CHAPMAN OWEN, also known as Nancy 

Jane Owen, Individually and as Trustee 

of the Nancy Jane Owen Trust; UNA CHAPMAN 

COX FOUNDATION; DANNA LEA ORR, as Trustee 

of the Danna Lea Orr Revocable Trust; 

TRINITY UNIVERSITY; PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN’S 

SERVICES, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

ANN EICHELBERGER, Co-Trustee of the 

Marital Deduction Trust under the 

Will of H. L. Eichelberger, Deceased; 

BROADWAY NATIONAL BANK, Co-Trustee of 

the Marital Deduction Trust under the 

Will of H. L. Eichelberger, Deceased, 

Intervenor PlaintiffsAppellants, 

versus

TEXACO INCORPORATED, 

Defendant-Intervenor 
2

 Defendant-Appellee, 
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

3

TEXACO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, 

INC., formerly known as Texaco 

Producing Incorporated, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(95-CV-408)

December 8, 1997

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this oil and gas case implicating alleged breaches of

contract by Defendants-Appellees, Texaco, Incorporated and Texaco

Exploration and Production, Inc. as mineral lessees of PlaintiffsAppellants and Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants (collectively,

Appellants), the district court granted summary judgment dismissing

all claims on alternative grounds of time bar and discharge in

bankruptcy. Appellants appealed the judgment of the district

court. 

We have reviewed the summary judgment record from the district

court, the opinion and judgment of that court, the largely

uncontested facts, and the legal arguments of the parties as set
4

forth the appellate briefs and oral arguments of able counsel. As

a result of our review, we are convinced that the district court’s

grant of summary judgment should be affirmed for the reasons given

by that court. 

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009180EN.01002401.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/24

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-555/08) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2005/56/EC - Cross-border mergers of limited liability companies - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2009/C 180/40

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and K. Nyberg, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk and A. Engman, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (OJ 2005 L 310, p. 1) — Financial institutions which require authorisation by a public body, in particular banks and insurance companies

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies, with regard to financial institutions which require authorisation by a public authority, in particular certain banks and insurance companies, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies, with regard to financial institutions which require authorisation by a public authority, in particular certain banks and insurance companies, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.

1

---
, J.

challenged ruling would not be appealable. Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1 Parraguirre cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge Donald Richard Childs, II Boyack & Beck Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, appellant need not file the proper person appeal statement. SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
Page 1 of 2

DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT

WELSH GOVERNMENT

 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL AFFAIRS - NORTHERN IRELAND

Veterinary Health Certificate for the Import of Live Fish, Fertilized Eggs, or Gametes of

Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC)-Susceptible Species into the United States of America

Veterinary Authority:*

Department for Environment, Food and Rural

Affairs (DEFRA) 

Certificate Number:*

Date of Issue:* U.S. Import Permit Number:*

1. Consignor (Name & Address):* 2. Consignee (Name & Address):*

3. Country of Origin:*

England

4. Destination in United States (Name & Address):*

5. City/Region of Origin: 6. Route of Travel:*

7. Port of Embarkation/Border Crossing:* 8. Means of Transport:*

9. Estimated Date of Shipment:* 10. Estimated Date of Arrival:*

11. Description of Commodity:

******************************************

12. Date Of Veterinary Inspection in Country of Origin:*

13. Total Quantity of Animals:* 14. Total Number Of Packages/Containers:*

16. Commodity Intended Use:*

Breeding Culture/grow out Research

17. Identification of Commodity:*

Scientific Name*

(Genus species) 

Common Name* Quantity* Sex

*Required Information that must be provided.

UNOFFICIAL COPY
Page 2 of 2

Certificate Number:*

I, the undersigned official veterinarian or fish health inspector of the competent authority, certify that the live 

animals described above meet thefollowing conditions:

1. Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC):

a. The facility of origin participates in an ongoing Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC) monitoring program for

species susceptible to SVC, by testing twice annually for a minimum of two (2) consecutive years, with at

least three (3) months between tests. AND

b. Populations were tested at a ninety-five (95) percent confidence and two (2) percent assumed prevalence

level, and found negative for SVC. AND

c. Sample collection was done at times when water temperatures are conducive to detecting SVC virus. AND

d. Samples were collected by a fish health inspector, employed by the competent authority. AND

e. Cell cultures were incubated on epithelioma papulosum cyprinid (EPC) cell lines at twenty (20) degrees

Celsius, in line with OIE recommended procedure. All testing results were negative for SVC.

2. The consignment was inspected by an official veterinarian or fish health inspector employed by the exporting

country’s competent authority within seventy-two (72) hours of shipment and found to be free of any clinical

evidence of SVC disease.

3. Shipping Containers:

a. All shipping containers are new.

***********************************************************************************************

***********************************************************************************************

Printed Name of Certifying Official: 

Signature of Certifying Official: 

Designation of Certifying official:

Date: Stamp: 

Veterinary Authority:* 

Department for Environment, Food and Rural

Affairs (DEFRA)

UNOFFICIAL COPY
#### Lela Irene MAFFEI and Lela Irene Maffei, Guardian ad litem of Charles Albert Maffei, Carol Irene Maffei and John Jay Maffei, Minors, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. INCORPORATED TOWN OF KEMMERER, Wyoming, Appellee (Defendant below).

No. 2843.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

June 23, 1959.

Lee S. Nebeker, Green River, Richard L. Bird, Jr., and C. J. Frost, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellants.

Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER and HARNSBERGER, JJ.

Mr. Justice HARNSBERGER

delivered the opinion of the court.

A petition for rehearing has been filed, explaining that because of the town’s contract of insurance the appellants could not have joined the insurance company. This is not a ground for rehearing.

The rcargument respecting estoppel, waiver, whether the complaint was limited to recovery against the insurance company, and whether there was a miscarriage of justice because the insurance company sold the town a policy of insurance which did not give the town the purported protection, were all disposed of by the opinion.

Rehearing denied.