alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.

	APPELLANT

	V.

	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE COURT OF  COUNTYNO. 2-10-01529   -        -CV

RoOyYcCeE ClLeEmMeEnNtTsS	APPELLANT	

TeErRrRyY TaAyYlLoOrR, InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY aAnNdD aAsS 	APPELLANT

ReEpPrReEsSeEnNtTaAtTiIvVeE oOfF tThHeE EsStTaAtTeE oOfF 

DoOrRsSiIeE ClLaArRkK TaAyYlLoOrR, DeEcCeEaAsSeEdD

	V.

WoOoOdDlLaAnNdD WeEsStT ApPtTsS.ThHeE CiItTyY oOfF GaAiInNeEsSvViIlLlLeE, TeExXaAsS	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY THE        DISTRICT COURT AT LAW NO. 1THE 235tThH DiIsStTrRiIcCtT CoOuUrRtT OF COOKE TARRANT            COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On fEBRUARYFebruary 24, 2010 ___________ and Februrary 26, 2010, __________, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 75[or $175 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $1275 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court'’s order of Auaugusgust 28, 2007July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:    li LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  March 9118, 2010
#### Edwin Mortenson et al., Respondents, *v.*Noah Chook, Doing Business as East End Cleaners, East End Dry Cleaners, Ltd. et al., Defendants, and Fulton Fire Insurance Company of New York, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

June 30, 1959.

*George I. Janow*for appellant.

*George H. Hamilton*for Noah Chook, respondent.

*Jules B. St. Germain*for Edwin Mortenson, respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiffs’ property was not covered, at the time of its loss by the insurance policy issued by the defendant Fulton Fire Insurance Company to the defendants Chook and East End Dry Cleaners, Ltd. *(Atlantic Fruit Co.*v. *Hamilton Fire Ins. Co.,*251 N. Y. 98; 13 A. L. R. 2d 718, § 4; see, also, *Rubin*v. *East|& West Ins. Co.,*72 N. Y. S. 2d 885.)

The judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Fulton Fire Insurance Company should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

The judgment in favor of defendants Noah Chook and East End Dry Cleaners, Ltd. against the defendant Fulton Fire Insur*136anee Company on their cross complaint should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts and cross complaint dismissed, without costs.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
# C_2019288EN.01001001.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/10

---

Order of the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2019 (request for preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena — Italy) — Azienda USL di Modena v Comune di Sassuolo

(Case C-26/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - State aid - National health service - Exemption from property tax - Immovable property leased to a commercial company constituted with blended capital active in the health sector in competition with other healthcare establishments exclusively constituted with private capital)

(2019/C 288/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Azienda USL di Modena

Defendant: Comune di Sassuolo

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena (Provincial Tax Court, Modena, Italy), by decision of 25 October 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
#### Tucker Management Co., Appellant, *v.*Anthony’s Beauty Salon, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

December 9, 1958.

*Alvin Goldstein*for appellant.

*William V. Laviano*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from order granting tenant’s motion to vacate final order entered on stipulation dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154). No opinion.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, etc.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 of Aerovox Incorporated of our report dated February 14, 2000 relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 14, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

By /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    08-019              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.	GaArRrRyY GiIbBbBoOnNsS	   APPELLANT	

	V.

KaArReEnN CuUlLwWeElLlL BaArRnNeEtTtT OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEE

 TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED	

	----------

	FROM THE 367TH367TH          PROBATE DISTRICT COURT  NO. 2 OF EDENTON                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s [s’]Eee’s’ “Motion To Dismiss aAppealAgreed First Amended Motion To Dismiss Appeal Based On MootnessNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(12)(A), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants [ [s]eeant[- [oOR the the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   DAUPHINIOT, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:    September 28, 2006  April 157, 2008
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4335 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for headstones and markers 

for, and interment in national cemeteries of, deceased spouses and dependent children of members of the Armed Forces serving on active 

duty, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. CORREA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for 

headstones and markers for, and interment in national 

cemeteries of, deceased spouses and dependent children 

of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Family 

5 Burial Act’’. 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4335 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION 

2 OF HEADSTONES AND MARKERS FOR, AND IN3 TERMENT IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF, 

4 SPOUSES AND DEPENDENT CHILDREN OF 

5 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES SERVING 

6 ON ACTIVE DUTY. 

7 (a) HEADSTONES AND MARKERS.—Section 

8 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘, or the 

10 spouse of a member of the Armed Forces serving on 

11 active duty under conditions other than dishonor12 able, as shown by a statement from a general court13 martial convening authority, at the time of the 

14 spouse’s death’’ after ‘‘veteran’’; and 

15 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘, or the 

16 eligible dependent child of a member of the Armed 

17 Forces serving on active duty under conditions other 

18 than dishonorable, as shown by a statement from a 

19 general court-martial convening authority, at the 

20 time of the child’s death’’ after ‘‘veteran’’. 

21 (b) INTERMENT IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES.—Sec22 tion 2402(a)(5) of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘, 

23 and the spouse, minor child, and, in the discretion of the 

24 Secretary, unmarried adult child of a member of the 

25 Armed Forces serving on active duty under conditions 

26 other than dishonorable, as shown by a statement from 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4335 IH

1 a general court-martial convening authority, at the time 

2 of the spouse’s or child’s death’’ after ‘‘paragraph (7)’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements listed below of Gehl Company of
our report dated February 20, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

| | 1. | Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-02195)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-04017)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-36102)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Pricewaterhouse
Coopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMilwaukee,
WisconsinMarch 4, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 635 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 635

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 3, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4557) to allow for judicial review of any 
final rule addressing national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants 
for brick and structural clay products or for clay ceramics manufacturing before 
requiring compliance with such rule. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 
order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day during the period from March 4, 2016, 
through March 11, 2016--
     (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be considered 
as approved; and
    (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date 
and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the 
Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Karnal Bunt Regulated Areas

§ 301.89-3(a)

Last update: February 14, 2024

Arizona – regulated portions of the State:

Maricopa County:

(1) Scottsdale: Sections 28, 29, 32 and 33 of Township 2 North and Range 5 East.

(2) Palo Verde: Sections 7, and 17 through 20 of Township 1 South and Range 4 West; and 

Sections 12 and 13 of Township 1 South and Range 5 West.

Pinal County:

(1) Maricopa: Section 34 of Township 4 South and Range 3 East; Sections 3, 11, and 14 of 

Township 5 South and Range 3 East.
<PAGE>   1

               CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

The following schedule lists the subsidiaries of Craftmade International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, as of August 31, 2001:

<Table>
<Caption>
           Corporate Name                                     State of Organization
           --------------                                     ---------------------

<S>                                                           <C>
Durocraft International, Inc.                                       Texas
C/D/R Incorporated                                                  Delaware
Trade Source International, Inc. (TSI)                              Delaware
TSI Prime Asia Limited                                              Hong Kong
Elitex Development Limited                                          Hong Kong
Prime/Home Impressions, LLC
   (in which TSI owns a 50% interest)                               North Carolina
Design Trends, LLC
   (in which Craftmade owns a 50% interest)                         Delaware
</Table>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4254 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4254

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 to 
 strengthen the aerospace workforce pipeline by the promotion of Robert 
  Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration internship and fellowship opportunities to women, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Women in Aerospace Education Act''.
SEC. 2. ROBERT NOYCE TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FELLOWSHIP 
OPPORTUNITIES.
    (a) In General.--The National Science Foundation Authorization Act 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-368; 42 U.S.C. 1862n et seq.) is amended--
        (1) in section 10(a)(3)(A)(iv), by inserting ``, including 
    research experiences at national laboratories and NASA centers'' 
    before the semicolon; and
        (2) in section 10A(c)(4)--
            (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) providing internship opportunities for fellows, 
        including research experiences at national laboratories and 
        NASA Centers.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to grants awarded on or after October 1, 2018.
SEC. 3. NASA INTERNSHIP AND FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES.
    Not later than October 1, 2018, the Administrator of the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration (in this section referred to as 
``NASA'') shall institute a process to encourage the recruitment of 
qualified candidates who are women or individuals who are 
underrepresented in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and 
mathematics (STEM) and computer science for internships and fellowships 
at NASA with relevance to the aerospace sector and related fields.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian
company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                  |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: April 11, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Chris Thiris |  |                        
|                      |  |  |  | Name:            |  | Chris Thiris            |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Title:           |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
# C_2009205EN.01001001.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-356/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services - Freedom of establishment - Free movement of capital - National legislation imposing an obligation on medical doctors established in the territory of the Land of Upper Austria to open a bank account with a particular bank)

2009/C 205/16

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa, acting as Agent and A. Böhlke, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 56 EC — National legislation imposing an obligation on medical doctors established in the territory of the Land of Upper Austria to open a bank account with the Oberösterreichische Landesbank

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing an obligation on every medical doctor becoming established in Oberösterreich (Land of Upper Austria) to open a bank account with the Oberösterreichische Landesbank in Linz to which fees for benefits in kind in the context of the exercise of his professional activity are to be transferred by the health insurance funds, the Republic of Austria has failed to comply with its obligations under Article 49 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing an obligation on every medical doctor becoming established in Oberösterreich (Land of Upper Austria) to open a bank account with the Oberösterreichische Landesbank in Linz to which fees for benefits in kind in the context of the exercise of his professional activity are to be transferred by the health insurance funds, the Republic of Austria has failed to comply with its obligations under Article 49 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.09.2008.

1

---
# C_2008183EN.01000702.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/7

---

Action brought on 7 February 2008 — Sandra Raulin v French Republic

(Case C-49/08)

(2008/C 183/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sandra Raulin (represented by: C. Vaucois, avocat)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

By order of 16 May 2008 the Court (Fifth Chamber) declared that it clearly had no jurisdiction to give a ruling on the action and ordered Mrs Raulin to pay her own costs.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6734

JOHN R. BINNS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1365-AM) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John R. Binns, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Binns v. Angelone , No. CA-97-1365-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED