alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 2, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Fire Protection Association (“NFPA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, NFPA has provided an updated and current list of its standards development activities, related technical committee and conformity assessment activities. Information concerning NFPA regulations, technical committees, current standards, standards development and conformity assessment activities are publicly available at                     *nfpa.org.*

                    On September 20, 2004, NFPA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61869).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 22, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 22, 2023 (88 FR 57129).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27556 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Biomedical Research Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 5, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anna Ghambaryan, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 2120, MSC 6902, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-4032,                         *anna.ghambaryan@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-27964 Filed 12-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
DensityMeasurement of PMN NCS ' 200 mls of the PMN NCS (SZf NCS in aqueous sodiumhydroxide

) was placed in a 250 ml graduated cylinder in a 23"C water batch. The density was measured

with a FisherBrandcalibrated 1.200 to 1.400 hydrometer. The density of the 52% NCS in aqueous sodium hydroxide

solution was found to be 1,22 after eguilibration.
#### Jose Delgado CABRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Troy WILLIAMSON, Warden; Doctor McCain; Correctional Officer Kirkland; Correctional Officer Worley, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-6547.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 2005.

Decided Oct. 19, 2005.

Jose Delgado Cabrera, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Henson Kinney, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jose Delgado Cabrera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his action under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Cabrera v. Williamson,*No. CA-04-237-5 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<Page>

Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q/A-1 (the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Colin Binny, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Colin Binny
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
April 30, 2009
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0074

SAT Date: 11/9/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77

FATE: Estimations for typical 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.30 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be 

a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the 

material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the 

lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the 

moieties. Moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.3 aliphatic amine SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.21 aliphatic amine SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.078 amide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.012 amide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.023 aliphatic amine SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.038 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; liquid; log Kow = 5.15 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category None
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - [Docket No. FAA-2013-0259]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Random drug and alcohol testing percentage rates of covered aviation employees for the period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On December 15, 2023, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a correction to the Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered Aviation Employees for the Period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. In that document, the FAA inadvertently provided the incorrect docket number in the heading and corrections sections. This document corrects that error.

# DATES:

This correction is effective December 21, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Vicky Dunne, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Policy Branch; Email                         *drugabatement@faa.gov;*                         Telephone (202) 267-8442.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On December 15, 2023, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published the Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered Aviation Employees for the Period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; Correction. In the heading and corrections section of the document, the docket number appeared as “Docket Number FAA-2023-25488” instead of “Docket No. FAA-2013-0259.” This document corrects that error.

## Correction

                    On page 87046 of the                     **Federal Register**                    , Vol. 88 No. 240, published December 15, 2023, in the second and third columns, the following correction is made to the second line of the Heading and thirteenth line of the Corrections section.                

## Docket No. FAA-2013-0259

Issued in Washington, DC.

Nancy Rodriguez Brown,

Director, Drug Abatement Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-28124 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### J. L. LLOYD, Plaintiff in Error, v. MIDWEST PUBLISHING COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

No. 37243.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 18, 1956.

Lowe & Sanchez, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in .error.

Dean & McWilliams, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

This action was brought by Midwest Publishing Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against J. L. Lloyd, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover the value of certain galleys of type and galleys allegedly wrongfully taken and appropriated by defendant. After a trial to the court, a jury being waived, judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the amount of $333.19, and defendant appeals.

As his only proposition of error, defendant contends that there was no evidence offered of compliance with the law requiring return for assessment of taxes on intangible property and payment of such taxes, as required by 68 O.S.1951 § 1515.

It appears from the pleadings and the evidence that the cause of action sued on accrued in either February or March of 1955; suit was filed on April 11, 1955, and judgment was rendered on July 18, 1955. Even if plaintiff’s claim was subject to the intangible property tax, which is doubtful, there was no intervening period at which an assessment should have been returned under 68 O.S.1951 § 1507, between the time of the accrual of the cause of action and the time of the entry of judgment in this case, and plaintiff was therefore not required to allege and prove payment of intangible tax nor excuse non-payment as provided in 68 O.S.1951 § 1515. Tulsa Defense Houses, *664Inc., v. Copeland, 206 Okl. 260, 243 P.2d 696; Lewis v. Boice, 205 Old. 189, 236 P.2d 258; Rutter v. Ilcatly, 198 Okl. 591, 180 P.2d 822.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
19299

#### State v. Williams

March 25, 1997

Order No. 97-31

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, William M. Caldwell, IV certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/Aof Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b                 [Not applicable]

 

c)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

d                 Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated March 29, 2006 |   | /s/ William M. Caldwell, IV |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                 |   |                        | William M. Caldwell, IV |
|                 |   |                        | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1
# C_2019230EN.01004301.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — KID-Systeme v EUIPO — Sky (SKYFi)

(Case T-354/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark SKYFi - Earlier national and EU word marks SKY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of signs - Identity of goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Suspension of the administrative procedure - Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Misuse of powers - Right to a fair trial - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Article 96 of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2019/C 230/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KID-Systeme GmbH (Buxtehude, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, G. Würtenberger and T. Wittmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and H. O’Neill, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sky Ltd, formerly Sky plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Saliger, Solicitor, and P. Roberts QC)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2018 (Case R 106/2017-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Sky and KID-Systeme.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KID-Systeme GmbH to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KID-Systeme GmbH to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.

---
# C_2021471EN.01001201.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/12

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2021 — Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-173/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Action for annulment - State aid - Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link - Individual aid - Act not open to challenge - Purely confirmatory measure - Preparatory measure)

(2021/C 471/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Scandlines Danmark ApS, Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë, V. Bottka and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren, acting as Agent, and by R. Holdgaard, advokat)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH shall pay, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.

---