alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**AMENDMENT TO**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

Amendment Number 1

 

WHEREAS, effective as ofApril 1, 2004, SCL Ventures, Ltd. (the “Company”) and Mitchell J.Sepaniak (the “Executive”) entered into an Employment Agreement (the“Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, Section 10of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be modified in writing by theCompany and the Executive; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company andthe Executive now mutually desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, theAgreement is hereby amended, effective as of August 9, 2004, asfollows:

 

# **FIRST**:           Section 3(a) of the Agreement ishereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

# ** **

“(a)  Base Salary.  During the Term, but solely after the dateas of which the Company has raised, during the period commencing on theCommencement Date, the sum of Seven Million Dollars ($7,000,000), the Companyshall pay the Executive a base salary (‘Base Salary’) at the rate of OneHundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) per annum, payable in accordance withthe Company’s regular payroll practices.”

 

1

----

 

# **SECOND**:                                            Except as otherwise hereinabove provided,the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without change ormodification.

# ** **

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, andas evidence of the adoption of the foregoing, the Company and the Executivehave caused this Amendment Number 1 to be duly executed, this 22nd day ofSeptember, 2004.

 
|   | SCL VENTURES, LTD.              |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                            |   |
|   |                            |   |
|   | By:                             | /s/ Joseph Zumwalt |   |
|   |                            | Name: | Joseph Zumwalt |
|   |                            | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                            |   |   |
|   |   /s/ Mitchell J. Sepaniak |   |
|   |   Mitchell J. Sepaniak     |   |
|        |                                 |  |  |  |

 

2

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4325 

To limit the fees charged by the National Archives and Records 

Administration to veterans for military service records, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York (for himself and Mrs. DINGELL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To limit the fees charged by the National Archives and 

Records Administration to veterans for military service 

records, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Military 

5 Service Records Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4325 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FEES CHARGED BY THE NATIONAL 

2 ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 

3 TO VETERANS FOR MILITARY SERVICE 

4 RECORDS. 

5 Section 2116 of title 44, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(d) Notwithstanding subsection (c), in the case of 

8 a military service record of an individual, the Archivist 

9 may not charge to such individual (or, if such individual 

10 is deceased, the next of kin or immediate family of such 

11 individual) more than the cost of mailing such record.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 111 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5319]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 9:30 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the 
previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:50 p.m., adjourned until 
Wednesday, July 25, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6874

ARTHUR LEE MILLER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

STAFF, at Columbia Care Center; NFN FISHER,

Security Guard at Columbia Care Center; NFN

SCOTT, Doctor at Columbia Care Center; SUPREME

COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; PROBATE COURT,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-725-2-10)

Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 10, 2004

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Miller appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Miller v.

Staff, No. CA-03-725-2-10 (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 |   |   | /s/ James G. Stewart    |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                     |   |   | James G. Stewart        |
|                     |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Filed 5/7/15 P. v. Trujillo CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts a nd parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. JESSE OMAR TRUJILLO, Defendant and Appellant. D066180

(Super. Ct. No. SCD235443)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Su perior Court of San Diego County, Timothy R. Walsh, Judge. Affirmed. Patrick J. Hennessey, Jr., under appoi ntment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In October 2012, the San Diego County grand jury indicted Jesse Omar Trujillo and two codefendants of numerous charges related to a scheme where the men used stolen identities to purchase two homes. Trujillo pleaded guilty to one count each of conspiracy to commit grand theft (count 1), using personal identifying2 information of another (count 2) and forg ery of documents (count 4). He also pleaded guilty to two counts of filing a false instrument (counts 8, 17) and admitted an allegation that the loss to the victims was more than $500, 000. It was agreed Trujillo would receive a five-year prison term. The trial court later sentenced Trujillo to the upper term of three years in prison on count 1, a two-year term for th e enhancement, and concurrent midterms of two years on the remaining charges. Tr ujillo received credit for four days of presentence custody. The court imposed a number of fines a nd fees and ordered joint restitution to the victim in the amount of $653,421.45. Trujillo timely appealed. The court later gr anted Trujillo's request for i ssuance of a certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION Appointed appellate counsel has file d a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. He presented no argume nt for reversal, but asked this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ). We granted Trujillo perm ission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. Our review of the record pursuant to Wende has disclosed no reasonably arguable issues on appeal. Competent co unsel has represented Trujillo on this appeal.3 DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

M C INTYRE, J.

WE CONCUR:

M C CONNELL, P. J. HUFFMAN, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         629,105
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,002,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                   495,447
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,116,676
<PP&E>                                      19,055,667
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,938,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,423,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,543,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       791,541
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,958,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,423,238
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,402,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,327,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,818,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               215,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             750,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,626,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                   483,320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,143,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,143,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. at December 31, 1999, and its statement of
income for the twelve months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form-10K of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. for the twelve months
ended December 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         925,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,679
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      16,586,787
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,602,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,146,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,159,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,146,133
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,581,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  637,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,545,690
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,545,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,545,690
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NuWay Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Dennis Calvert,
President  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


                               /s/    Dennis  Calvert
                              -----------------------------
                              By:     Dennis  Calvert
                                      President
                                      August  16,  2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NuWay Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe Tawil, Acting
Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/  Joe  Tawil
                                      ------------------
                              By:     Joe  Tawil
                                      Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                      August 16, 2002
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name CAS RN 73361-29-2 Summary of Molecular Weight Distribution and Percent Monomer Composition Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
# C_2020215EN.01001801.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — San Domenico Vetraria SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate

(Case C-94/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC - Articles 2 and 6 - Scope - Taxable transactions - Services supplied for consideration - Secondment of staff by a parent company to its subsidiary - Reimbursement by the subsidiary limited to the costs incurred)

(2020/C 215/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: San Domenico Vetraria SpA

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Supported by: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2, point 1, of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the lending or secondment of staff of a parent company to its subsidiary, carried out in return for only the reimbursement of the related costs, is irrelevant for the purposes of VAT, provided that the amounts paid by the subsidiary to the parent company, on the one hand, and that lending or secondment, on the other, are interdependent.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
#### Joseph Waldman, Respondent, v Dong Kook Chang et al., Defendants, and Thomas Holcomb, Appellant.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident, the defendant Thomas Holcomb appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated September 18, 1989, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the defendant Thomas Holcomb, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case that he sustained "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The affirmation of the plaintiff’s treating physician indicated that the plaintiff suffered a 15% limitation in the range of motion of his cervical spine and back as a result of injuries sustained in the instant automobile accident. However, we find the physician’s affirmation to be merely "conclusory assertions tailored to meet statutory requirements” *(Lopez v Senatore,*65 NY2d 1017, 1019). Furthermore, the balance of the evidence, including the plaintiff’s own deposition testimony and hospital records, fail to show any such limitation.

Even assuming that a restriction of motion were demonstrated, the plaintiff failed to prove that it constituted a significant limitation of use of a body organ or member so as to meet the threshold requirement for maintaining this action. It is well established that a minor limitation of movement is not significant within the meaning of the statute *(see, Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230; *Konco v E.T.C. Leasing Corp.,*160 AD2d 680; *Ciaccio v J & R Home Improvements,*149 AD2d 558; *Palmer v Amaker,*141 AD2d 622). Accordingly, the Su*205preme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer of Email Real Estate.com,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
May 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 11, 2003

/s/Dan O'Meara,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Financial Officer of Email Real Estate.com,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
May 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 11, 2003

 /s/Dan O'Meara
Dan O'Meara, President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Glachan, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered January 3, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues *293which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf, People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report), I, James E. Dixon, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.James E. Dixon, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2005