alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Inspire 1-Specifications From DJI Wiki 

## SpecificationsRetrieved from " http://wiki.dji.com/en/index.php?title=Inspire_1-Specifications&oldid=22653 " This page was last modified on 13 February 2015, at 06:59. This page has been accessed 1,142 times.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE 

OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS 

• OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner 

• Misc. Docket AG 

v. • No. 0071 

• September Term, 2016 

STERLING GARRETT MEAD 

• Circuit Court 

Respondent • for Montgomery County 

• Case No. 33032-M 

***********4t*********************************** 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for One-Year Suspension by Consent filed herein 

pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient 

evidence exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of 

Rules 1.5(a), 5.5(a), 8.1(b) and 8.4(a)-(d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional 

Conduct in effect prior to July 1, 2016, it is this 8th day of June , 2017, 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Sterling Garrett Mead, 

Respondent, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this State for a period of one year, 

effective July 3,2017; and it is further 

ORDERED, that on July 3, 2017, the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Sterling 

Garrett Mead from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of such action, and 

comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(6); and it is further 

ORDERED, that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance 

Commission of Maryland against Sterling Garrett Mead in the amount of $1,019.30. 

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. 

Senior Judge
# C_2021481EN.01000801.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 — ClientEarth v European Commission, European Chemicals Agency

(Case C-458/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 3549 final - Authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Articles 60 and 62 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Request for internal review - Commission Decision C(2016) 8454 final - Rejection of the request)

(2021/C 481/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: ClientEarth (represented by: A. Jones, Barrister, and J. Stratford BL)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and F. Becker, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0430. The time required 

to complete this information collection is estimated to average .1 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data 

sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 

OMB Approved 

0579-0430 

Exp. 02/2025

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE 

VETERINARY SERVICES NVSL Contact Information Update 

NVSL ID Number: 

Name of Individual (Optional): 

Name of Business/Laboratory (Required): 

Mailing Address: 

City: 

State: ZIP Code: 

Country: 

Phone Number: Fax Number: 

Email Address(s): 

Preferred Method of Contact (Select One) (Fax or Email Preferred): 

□ Fax □ Email □ United States Postal Service Mail 

Comments/Additional Instructions: 

□ This record is no longer needed; remove it from your active files. 

Return updated forms via one of the following ways: 

Email:NvslCaseCoordinator@aphis.usda.gov 

Fax Number: 515-337-7022 

Mail: USDA/APHIS/VS/National Veterinary Services Laboratories 

Attn: LIMS Contact Update 

1920 Dayton Ave. 

Ames, IA 50010 

VS FORM 4-10 

MAY 2015
Fifth
                                   Amendment
                                     of the
                                Restated 2/22/91  
                                    By-Laws 
                                       of
                                  GEHL COMPANY
                           (A Wisconsin Corporation)



          Effective immediately, Section 3.01 shall be revised to read as
          follows:



                   "3.01.  General Powers and Number.  All corporate
          powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of,
          and the business and affairs of the corporation shall be
          managed under the direction of its Board of Directors.
          The number of directors of the corporation shall be nine
          (9) divided into three (3) classes:  Class I-three (3)
          directors; Class II - three (3) directors; Class III -
          three (3) directors." 





Approved at 02/23/96 Board Meeting
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Talon Therapeutics, Inc. does hereby certify that to the best of his knowledge:





(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Talon Therapeutics, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Talon Therapeutics, Inc.





Dated: May 13, 2011
/s/ Steven R. Deitcher, MDSteven R. Deitcher, MDPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: May 13, 2011
/s/ Craig W. CarlsonCraig W. Carlson

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2007- CR
- 2049, s t y l ed T h e S ta te o

f T e x a s v . D a rry l B . W

e lls , i n t he 3 7 9 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable B ert R i chard son p res i d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 89 9- CR IN RE Da

ry l WEL LS Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: Dece mber 23, 2008 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED Dar y l Wells filed a pr o se petition for a writ of mandamus on Dece mber 11, 2008. Wells was sentenc ed August 28, 2008, an d fi l ed a notice of appea l on Aug ust 29, 2008. The trial cour t
a pp oin te d th e B e xar

County Pub lic De fe nd e r’ s Of

fi c e to r e pr e se nt We lls on a pp e a l. I n th is p ro se pe tit ion , We lls se e ks to c omp e l the tr ia l c ourt to “ ru le on

c ourt re po rt e r’ s r e c or d a

nd tr ia l tr a ns c ri pts motions.” We conclude Wells’ a ppointed counsel is also counse l for an or igina l proce eding on the issue prese nted. Wells is not entitled to hy brid repr esenta tion. See Pa tri c k v . S tat e , 906 S.W .2d 481, 49 8 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 95 ); Gray v . Shipley , 877 S.W .2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.–Houston [1s t Dist.] 1994, orig
. proce eding ). Acc ording ly , the pro se pe tition for a writ of manda mus is denied. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a)
.04
- 08
- 00 89 9- CR

- 2- The c lerk of this cour

t is directed to tra

nsmit a copy

of this opinion to t he attorney s of re cord, the trial cour

t judge , and the tria l court cle rk.

PER C URI AM Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          70,881
<SECURITIES>                                     1,281
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,362
<PP&E>                                          56,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,948
<BONDS>                                         86,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,538
<COMMON>                                        71,357
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,962
<SALES>                                            892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,548
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
        


</TABLE>
22137

#### Kreizenbeck v. State, Dept. of Human Services

Affirmed
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0225

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM211AD

ALS PART 1, R05 VARIATION --- 3/31/11

ALS PART 1, R04 VARIATION --- 7/7/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA
- 2012
- 1001 Directorate Identifier: 2012
- NM
- 020
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION PERSON C ONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Cessna Aircraft Co mpany Engineers/Project

Engineers

Other/Additional Information:
Exhibit 21

       SUBSIDIARIES OF CFI PROSERVICES, INC., DBA CONCENTREX INCORPORATED

Name of Subsidiary and                     Percentage of Securities Owned
JURISDICTION IN WHICH ORGANIZED         DIRECTLY BY CFI PROSERVICES, INC.

ULTRADATA Corporation (Delaware)                      100%
MECA Software, L.L.C. (Delaware)                       99%
MoneyScape Holdings, Inc. (Oregon)                    100%






<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports  dated  January 28, 2000  included in this Form 10-K into the  Company's
previously filed Registration Statements File No. 33-70506, No. 33-89872, No.
333-11351, No. 333-87901 and No. 333-32820 on Form S-8.

                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 30, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10(b)(1)

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

                         ICF KAISER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                         EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

     WHEREAS, the ICF Kaiser International, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(the "Plan") was established effective March 1, 1987 and most recently amended
and restated effective January 1, 1996, and is duly maintained by ICF Kaiser
International, Inc. (the "Company"); and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.2 of the Plan, the Board of Directors has
the right to amend the Plan;

     NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following provision be, and hereby
is, adopted, effective January 1, 1998:

     1.   Sections 8.3(a) and 11.3(b) of the Plan are amended by substituting
the term "$5,000" for the term "$3,500" where it occurs therein.

     FURTHER RESOLVED that any steps taken by officers or directors of the
Company to effectuate the foregoing resolutions prior to their formal adoption
are hereby accepted, confirmed and ratified by the Company.
Order entered January 18 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05
- 22
- 00695
- CR DARIOUS DANTREL LEWIS , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 20
- 75804
- H O RDER The clerk’s record in this case is incomplete in that it does not contain the court’s docket sheet as required by T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 34.5(a)(3) and as requested by appe llant. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s docket sheet. The supplemental record shall be filed by JANUARY 31, 2023

. The reporter’s record is overdue. The reporter’s record was due November 15, 2022. The Court has granted C ourt R eporter Cheryl A. Dixon three extensionsto file the reporter’s record. On November 15, 2022, Ms. Dixon requested a fourteen

- day extension; we granted the extension and ordered the reporter’s record filed by November 29, 2022. On December 5, 2022, Ms. Dixon filed her “second and final” request for an extension of eleven days; we granted the extension and ordered the reporter’s record filed by December 16, 2022. On December 19, 2022, Ms. Dixon filed her third request for an extension, stating she needed fifteen days to complete the record. We granted the extension and ordered the reporter’s recor d filed by January 12, 2023. As of the date of this order, the reporter’s record has not been filed. Ac cordingly, we ORDER Cheryl A. Dixon to file the reporter’ s record no later than FEBRUARY 1 6 , 2023

. We expressly CAUTION Ms. Dixon that failure to comply with this order WILL result in the Court taking such action as is necessary to have Ms. Dixon comply with the Court’s orders, including an order that she is not to sit as a court reporter until she complies.

We DIRECT the clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Tina Yoo Clinton, Criminal District Court No. 1; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County Clerk ; Cheryl A. Dixon, Court Reporter; and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
# C_2009141EN.01001801.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Rafet Kqiku

(Case C-139/08) (1)

1

(Visas, asylum, immigration - Third-country national holding a Swiss residence permit - Entry of and stay in the territory of a Member State for purposes other than transit - Lack of a visa)

2009/C 141/29

Language of the case: Germany

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe

Party/parties in the main proceedings

Party/parties in the main proceedings

Rafet Kqiku

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) — Interpretation of Articles 1 and 2 of Decision No 896/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory (OJ 2006 L 167, p. 8) — Possibility for a national of the former State Union of Serbia and Montenegro residing in Switzerland and holding a Swiss type C permanent resident permit to enter the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany for purposes other than transit and to remain there for two days without a visa

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Decision No 896/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory must be interpreted as meaning that the residence permits listed in the annex to that decision, issued by the Swiss Confederation or the Principality of Liechtenstein to third-country nationals subject to a visa requirement, are considered to be equivalent to a transit visa only. As regards entering the territory of the Member States for the purpose of transit, the requirements laid down in Articles 1(1) and 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement are fulfilled if the person covered by that decision is in possession of a residence permit issued by the Swiss Confederation or the Principality of Liechtenstein which is listed in the annex to that decision.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 19.07.2008.

1

---
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

APHIS-Approved Testing Laboratories

Last Modified: 

Print

Testing for certain types of diseases must be performed at either the NVSL or other

APHIS-approved facilities. Some testing is performed only by laboratories in the

National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN). Click on any of entries below to

show facilities that, with the NVSL, are approved to perform the corresponding

tests. 

Laboratories requesting approval to conduct testing (other than NAHLN) should

contact the Assistant District Director for their State. For information about NAHLN

membership requirements, visit NAHLN Laboratories.

Name (all documents in PDF format)

African Swine Fever (NAHLN labs)

Anaplasmosis

Aquaculture

Avian Influenza (NAHLN labs)

National Poultry Improvement Plan authorized labs list

AI-AGID SOP

Bluetongue

Bovine Leukosis
Name (all documents in PDF format)

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (NAHLN labs)

Brucella ovis

Brucella abortus

Caprine PrP Genotyping

Chronic Wasting Disease (NAHLN labs)

Classical Swine Fever (NAHLN labs)

Contagious Equine Metritis

Equine Infectious Anemia

Equine Viral Arteritis

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (NAHLN labs)

Infectious Salmon Anemia (NAHLN labs)

Ovine PrP Genotyping

Newcastle Disease (NAHLN labs)

Johne's Disease

Milk ELISA

Serum ELISA

Johne's Disease—organism-based methods

Johne's Disease—pooling methods

Equine Piroplasmosis

Pseudorabies

Scrapie (NAHLN labs)

Spring Viremia of Carp (NAHLN labs)

Swine Influenza (NAHLN labs)

Vesicular Stomatitis (NAHLN labs)

Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia (NAHLN labs) 

See More See Less

Related Information
The NVSL provides proficiency testing services for several disease testing platforms

to international laboratories by request. Please note that the laboratories

reviewed under this proficiency testing are not “APHIS-approved,” but

rather have demonstrated compliance with ISO testing standards for the

diseases under which they are listed. Click on the entries below to show

facilities that have successfully completed the most recent proficiency testing panels

for each disease with the NVSL.

Anaplasmosis (International)

Brucella abortus (International)

Johne's Disease—serology (International)

Johne's Disease—organism-based methods (International)

Johne's Disease—pooling methods (International)

Johne's Disease—milk (International)
# C_2010221EN.01000702.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 June 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-571/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 95/59/EC - Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco - Article 9(1) - Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products - National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes - Justification - Protection of public health)

2010/C 221/11

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and L. Pignataro, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I. Bruni, then by G. Palmieri, acting as Agents and F. Arena, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 9 of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco (OJ 1995 L 291, p. 40) — Fixing minimum prices — Approval of prices.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by providing for a minimum price for cigarettes, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9(1) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco, as amended by Council Directive 2002/10/EC of 12 February 2002; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by providing for a minimum price for cigarettes, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 9(1) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco, as amended by Council Directive 2002/10/EC of 12 February 2002;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---