alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kathleen B. Oher, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Craftmade
International, Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 28, 2004
    
    /s/Kathleen B. Oher
Kathleen B. Oher
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Warren William ALRED, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12831.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 20, 1960.

Shoemake & Briggs, Pawhuska, for plaintiff in error.

*756Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Warren William Aired was charged in the county court of Osage County with driving a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under revocation, second and subsequent offense. On the 10th day of February, 1959 the defendant appeared before the county court and entered a plea of guilty to the charge, and the court thereupon assessed a fine of $175 and costs in the amount of $18.25, and defendant to serve 45 days imprisonment in the Osage County jail.

Appeal is by transcript. No briefs have been filed. Defendant is over three months in default.

We have examined the information and find that no demurrer was interposed to it, and that the information properly set out the charge to which defendant entered a plea of guilty. Also the punishment assessed was within the provisions of the statute (47 O.S.A. § 303) which reads:

> “No person shall operate a motor vehicle • upon the highways of this State during the time for which the license of said person as an operator or chauffeur was denied, cancelled, suspended or revoked, and each act of driving on the highways as prohibited shall constitute a separate offense.

> “Any violation of the provisions of this Section shall constitute a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punishable therefor as follows:

> “(1) Upon first offense, by a fine of not less than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), or by imprisonment in jail for not more than thirty (30) days, either or both.

> “(2) Upon a second or subsequent offense or offenses, by a fine of not less than One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), nor more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) and imprisonment in jail for a period of not less than thirty (30) days nor more than twelve (12) months.” As Amended, Laws 1953, p. 211, § 1.

As we have so often said, where no briefs are filed by an appellant, and an examination of the record discloses no fundamental error, the case will be affirmed. Marshall v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 398, 264 P.2d 770.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.
# C_2009044EN.01002501.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/25

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2008 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis, Greece) — Maria Kastrinaki v Panepistimiako Geniko Nosokomeio Thessalonikis AHEPA

(Joined Cases C-180/08 and C-186/08) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 89/48/EEC - Recognition of diplomas - Studies completed in an ‘independent study centre’ not recognised as an educational establishment by the host Member State)

(2009/C 44/41)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis

Parties

Appellant: Maria Kastrinaki

Appellant:

Respondent: Panepistimiako Geniko Nosokomeio Thessalonikis AHEPA

Respondent:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis — Interpretation of Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16) — Interpretation of Article 39(1) EC, the first paragraph of Article 10 EC and Articles 43, 47(1), 49, 55, 149 and 150 EC — National of a Member State who has pursued a regulated profession in the host Member State before and after recognition of professional equivalence resulting from academic qualifications obtained in another Member State — Prior completion of part of university studies, under a franchising agreement, in an institution not recognised as an educational establishment by the host Member State — Possibility, by reason of a refusal to recognise such qualifications, of excluding a worker from professional activity

Operative part of the order

The competent authorities of a host Member State are required, under Article 3 of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration, to permit a national of a Member State who holds a diploma within the meaning of that directive issued by a competent authority of another Member State to pursue his profession on the same conditions as apply to holders of national diplomas even though that diploma:

| — | attests to education and training received, in whole or in part, at an establishment located in the host Member State which, according to the legislation of that State, is not recognised as an educational establishment, and |
| --- | --- |

—

attests to education and training received, in whole or in part, at an establishment located in the host Member State which, according to the legislation of that State, is not recognised as an educational establishment, and

| — | has not been homologated by the competent national authorities. |
| --- | --- |

—

has not been homologated by the competent national authorities.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 5.7.2008.

1

---
مثال: بیان مالك / متعھد النقل للأغنام و الماعز 

Example: Owner/Hauler Statement for Sheep and Goats 

عنوانھ و اسم المالك 

 Owner Name and Address

Address and Name Destination عنوانھ و اسم الوجھة

الاسم: 

Name

Name الاسم: 

العنوان: 

Address

العنوان: 

Address

المدینة/الولایة/الرمز البریدي: 

City/State/Zip

المدینة/الولایة/الرمز البریدي: 

City/State/Zip

الھاتف: 

Phone

الھاتف: 

Phone

اسم متعھد النقل و عنوانھ 

Hauler Name and Address :الحیوانات نقل تاریخ

Date Animals Moved

الاسم: 

Name

العنوان: 

Address رقم التعریف الشخصي أو معرف القطیع المصاب بمرض الراعوش *:

*رقم معرف المبنى 

Scrapie Flock ID or PIN :البریدي الرمز/الولایة/المدینة

City/State/Zip

الھاتف: 

Phone

معلومات الحیوانات 

عدد الحیوانات 

Number of 

animals

الأغنام أو

الماعز 

Sheep or 

Goats

(Breed (السلالة 

(إذا لم تكن معروفة: بالنسبة إلى الأغنام، تشمل 

وجھ ولون الماعز، تشمل النوع :الحلیب 

واللحم والفرو). 

(Class (الفئة 

(فرز النعاج/إناث الظباء، كباش /ذكور الظباء، وحدة تغذیة

الحملان/الجدیان، ذبح الحملان/الجدیان وما إلى ذلك) 

رقم معرف دفعة المجموعة 

(معرف القطیع —یوم شھر سنة —

رقم التسلسل) 

(Group Lot ID Number)

توجد ھذه الحیوانات في قنوات الذبح (channels slaughter in are animals These(

توقیع المالك/متعھد النقل (Signature Hauler/Owner(:

أقر أنا الموقع أدناه أن البیانات المذكورة أعلاه صحیحة و أن الماشیة المدرجة في القائمة مصنفة بصورة سلیمة
# C_2020061EN.01002801.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Vins el Cep v EUIPO — Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien (MIM NATURA)

(Case T-589/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark MIM NATURA - Earlier international word and figurative registrations MM and MM and earlier national word mark MUMM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 61/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vins el Cep, SL (Sant Sadurní d’Anoia, Spain) (represented by: J. Vázquez Salleras and G. Ferrer Gonzalvez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH (Eltville, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2018 (Case R 2270/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien and Vins el Cep, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vins el Cep, SL, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vins el Cep, SL, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 111 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5319]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, the first vote tomorrow will be a cloture 
vote on the motion to proceed to the Middle Class Tax Act at 2:15 p.m.

                          ____________________
```
[751 NYS2d 667]

#### Gran Sabana Corp., N.V., Respondent, v Midtown Gourmet Food Market, Inc., Respondent, and John Doe et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 21, 2002

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Horing Welikson & Rosen, P.C.,*Forest Hills *(Leonard R. Kaplain*of counsel), for appellants. *Mandel, Resnik & Kaiser,**789*P.C.,*New York City *(Jerry A. Montag*of counsel), for Gran Sabana Corp., N.V., respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order dated March 14, 2002 reversed with $10 costs, appellants’ motion to vacate the default judgment is granted, and the matter is remanded for farther proceedings on the petition consistent with this decision.

Appeal from order dated February 28, 2002 dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The default judgment must be vacated because of landlord’s failure to name and join a necessary party, appellant K&G Food Market, Inc. K&G, the tenant under a commercial lease for the sale of fancy groceries and other items, sold its assets and assigned the lease to respondent Midtown Gourmet Food Market, Inc. Simultaneously, the lease was reassigned back to K&G, which then subleased the premises to Midtown for a term of 10 years. Landlord consented to these transactions in writing. The subsequent commencement of nonpayment proceedings solely against Midtown — a subtenant — without joining K&G, was ineffective to terminate K&G’s tenancy rights since K&G continued as tenant of record and sublessor pursuant to the reassignment and sublease *(see,*2 Dolan, Rasch’s Landlord and Tenant — Summary Proceedings §§ 38:16, 38:17 [4th ed]; *Poole v Pellati,*251 AD2d 480).

Civil Court recognized these controlling principles, but declined to afford any relief to K&G in this proceeding on the ground that it had filed a certificate of corporate dissolution.* However, this filing did not defeat K&G’s possessory interest. Generally, a lease to a corporation is not terminated by the dissolution of the corporation and, unless the lease so provides, the rights and obligations thereunder are not extinguished by the corporation’s dissolution *(see, Matter of Goldberg v Harwood,*216 AD2d 152, *affd*88 NY2d 911). Until dissolution is complete, the corporation continues to hold title to assets *(see, Wells v Ronning,*269 AD2d 690, 692). On this record, where details of the corporate dissolution are not set forth, it cannot be said that K&G has forfeited its rights under the preexisting lease. Accordingly, the matter is remanded to Civil Court for proceedings on the nonpayment petition, at which K&G shall be joined as a party respondent.

*790The court notes that reletting of the premises was stayed by Civil Court pending determination of this appeal.

McCooe, J.P., Gangel-Jacob and Schoenfeld, JJ., concur.

*

 K&G was granted leave to pursue its claims in a plenary action.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director and/or
officer of ANTEC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), which
is about to file an annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on Form 10-K, hereby constitutes
and appoints Robert J. Stanzione, Lawrence A Margolis and Michael Graziano and
each of them his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full
power and all capacities, to sign the Corporation's Form 10-K and any and all
amendments thereto, and any other documents in connection therewith, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as she or he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact agents
or their substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his or her hand
and seal as of the 7th day of March, 2001.



/s/ JOHN EGAN                                   /s/ LARRY ROMRELL
-------------------------------                 --------------------------------



/s/ BRUCE VAN WAGNER                            /s/ JOHN PETTY
-------------------------------                 --------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM SCHLEYER                            /s/ JOHN IAN ANDERSON CRAIG
-------------------------------                 --------------------------------



/s/ ROD DAMMEYER                                /s/ SAMUEL SKINNER
-------------------------------                 --------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM LAMBERT                             /s/ JAMES L. FAUST
-------------------------------                 --------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Performance Food Group Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-72400, 333-12223, 333-78229, 333-60528, 333-102154, 333-102155, 333-105082
and 333-117355) on Form S-8, the registration statements (Nos. 333-24679,
333-61612 and 333-68877) on Form S-4 and the registration statements (Nos.
333-48462 and 333-63610) on Form S-3 of Performance Food Group Company of our
reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Performance Food Group Company and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the
three-year period ended January 1, 2005, and the related financial statement
schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of January 1, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, which reports appear in
the January 1, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Performance Food Group
Company.

                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 15, 2005
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Hana
        Biosciences, Inc. does hereby certify that to the best of his
        knowledge:
 
 (a)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hana Biosciences, Inc. for the quarter ended
        September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of Hana Biosciences,
        Inc.
 
 Dated:
                  November 14, 2008
              /s/
                  Steven R. Deitcher, MDSteven
                  R. Deitcher, MDPresident
                  and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
                  November 14, 2008
              /s/
                  John P. IparraguirreJohn
                  P. IparraguirreVice
                  President, Chief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 3, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00616

- CV

Vista Medical Center Hospital, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation; and

Texas Mutual Insurance Company , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND FIELD REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART

--

OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on May 30, 2013. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the district court’s judgme nt. Therefore, the Court reverses the portion of the district court’s

judgment awarding monetary relief to Texas Mutual Insurance Company and renders judgment

that Texas Mutual take nothing on that claim

. We remand Texas Mutual’s remaining alternative

co nstitutional and statutory claims to the district court for further proceedings consistent with our

opinion. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court

below.
- Bryan \1/, Shaw, Ph ,D .. Chainl7Gn 

Buddy Garcia, Commissioner 

Carlos Rubinstein, Commissirmer RECEIVED 

[I.'lark R. Vickery, P.G" Executil'f.' Diredor 11 JUN - 6 PH 2: I B 

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SUr tj-;·.fUND DIV. . . DiRECTOR'S OF C. 

Pro!ecli17{/ Texas by Reducing and Preur!11lirlg Pol/ution 

May 26, 2011 -, 

:' 

" ?J -....... . 

r> 

c 

,Cf'> iT· 

- ,. 

-0 Ml'. Samuel Coleman, P.E., Director 

Superfund Division 

, 

- :~..:. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue 

Dallas. Texas 75202 · 

Re: Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site, Jefferson County, Texas 

Direct Final Action to Delete from the National Priorities List (NPL) 

Dear Mr, Coleman: 

-. 

] 

-4" .. ~ 

! 

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has reviewed the Draft Notice of 

Direct Final Action for the referenced site. We concur with the conclusion "that all a.ppropriate 

response actions under CERCL\ at the Palmer Barge Line Superfund Site have been 

completed, .. 

Because the selected remedy resulted in hazardous substances remaining onsite at 

concentrations that do not allow unlimited use , revie\vs will be required at least as often as every 

five years from the initiation of the remedial action, The first five-year review "vill be conducted 

before September 2012, The TCEQ also notes that the EPA has obtained Restrictive Covenants 

from the ]ando" .... ner, v\'hich have been filed among the appropriate property records for the site, 

indicating that the future use of the property is restricted to commercial/industrial purposes. 

The TCEQ understands that this Direct Final Action will be effective 60 days from the date of 

publica tio-n ffl'-Hte Federal Reg ister.-y-nlcss thf:' EP-A--f.ec.p.i.\'p$ -<:ignifica nt adverse O.r .critical 

comments within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register., in "' .... hich case the EPA will 

publish a document tJlat \\;thdraws tJ1is action. 

In summary, the TCEQ concurs \vith the EPA proposaJ to delete the Palmer Barge Line 

Superfund Site from the NPL by Direct Final Action. 

Mark R. Vickery, P,G, 

Executive Director 

MV/,fP/c,'\' 

p,o, Box l:\OR7 Austi n. Texas n 711<10117 512·239-1000 I nternet address: www.tceq .stdte.tx.us 

<:.. 

fl. 

r-'
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Hume, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
20th day of November, 2006.



/s/ Michael Hume
---------------------------------------
Michael Hume
Treasurer and Secretary
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.