alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 105

 To permit management of the red snapper by Gulf Coast States and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2015

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit management of the red snapper by Gulf Coast States and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Red Snapper Management Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Exclusive economic zone.--The term ``exclusive economic 
        zone'' has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the 
        Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 
        U.S.C. 1802).
            (2) Fishery management plan.--The term ``fishery management 
        plan'' means a plan for the sustainability of the red snapper 
        in the Gulf of Mexico and the economic and community benefits 
        of each of the Gulf coastal States.
            (3) Gulf coastal state.--The term ``Gulf coastal State'' 
        means--
                    (A) Alabama;
                    (B) Florida;
                    (C) Louisiana;
                    (D) Mississippi; or
                    (E) Texas.

SEC. 3. MANAGEMENT OF RED SNAPPER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO.

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), if each of 
the Gulf coastal States agrees to a fishery management plan, the Gulf 
coastal States shall have exclusive authority to manage and conserve 
the red snapper in the waters of each Gulf coastal State and the 
exclusive economic zone in the Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 4. FUNDING.

    If each of the Gulf coastal States agrees to a fishery management 
plan, the Secretary of Commerce shall provide appropriate funding to 
the Gulf coastal States to carry out necessary stock assessments and 
data collection related to the red snapper fishery in the Gulf of 
Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 72432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29372]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket DOT-OST-2012-0108]

Application of Boutique Air, Inc. for Commuter Air Carrier 
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2012-11-32).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Boutique 
Air, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it commuter air carrier 
authority to conduct scheduled commuter service.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
December 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2012-0108 and addressed to Docket Operations, (M-30, 
Room W12-140), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties 
listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Snoden, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room W86-471), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-4834.

    Dated: November 29, 2012.
Robert Letteney,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, For Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-29372 Filed 12-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7573** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. STEPHEN ROBINSON, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Face , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 5:06

- cr - 00014

- SGW

- RSB

- 5; 5:12

- cv - 80457

- SGW

RSB )

Submitted : February 2 1 , 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Stephen Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Stephen Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certi ficate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that re asonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# C_2009220EN.01001402.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-574/08) (1)

1

(Internal market - Free movement of capital - Fight against fraud and money laundering)

2009/C 220/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Peere and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: D. Haven, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or to communicate, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of politically exposed person and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis (OJ 2006 L 214, p. 29)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of politically exposed person and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of politically exposed person and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
# C_2021079EN.01001501.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Spain) — Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) v BT

(Case C-843/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Article 4(1) - Voluntary early retirement - Early retirement pension - Eligibility - Requirement for the pension amount to be received to be at least as much as the legal minimum amount - Proportion of workers of each sex excluded from the benefit of early retirement - Justification of a potential particular disadvantage to female workers - Social policy objectives of the Member State concerned)

(2021/C 79/18)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

Defendant: BT

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1) of Council Directive 79/7 of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation which, in the event of voluntary early retirement of a worker enrolled in the general social security scheme, makes that worker’s right to an early retirement pension contingent on the condition that the amount of that pension must be at least as much as the minimum pension to which that worker would be entitled at the age of 65, even if that law puts at a particular disadvantage female workers compared with male workers, which is for the referring court to verify, in so far as that consequence is justified by legitimate social policy objectives which are unrelated to any discrimination based on sex.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
June 2020

There were 13 surveillance inspections conducted at 11 different sites for a total of 

80 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to increase in response to the 

warmer air temperatures. Several sites were stocked with smolts. Ten of the 11 sites 

with fish in the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

One Category 2 (suspect), was sampled biweekly, and continued routine harvest. No 

cages were confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

July 2019 123 0 21415

August 2019 96 0 21511

September 2019 101 0 21612

October 2019 90 0 21702

November 2019 93 0 21795

December 2019 91 0 21886

January 2020 81 0 21967

February 2020 78 0 22045

March 2020 55 0 23000

April 2020 50 0 23050

May 2020 50 0 23100

June 2020 80 0 23180
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,337,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                   450,295
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,654,777
<PP&E>                                      19,670,913
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,614,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,430,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,232,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       802,024
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,115,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,430,515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,719,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,244,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,456,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               290,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,178,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,899,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                   738,320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,161,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,161,590
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  September 28, 2009
    By:
    /s/ C. Brett BurfordC. Brett BurfordChief Financial Officer
Craftmade International, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         U. S. OPPORTUNITY SEARCH, INC.

            U. S. Opportunity Search , Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify:

            The amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation set
forth in the following resolution was duly approved by a majority of the
Corporation's Board of Directors and was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware:

     RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
     amended by striking Article FIRST in its entirety and replacing it with:
     "FIRST: The name of the corporation (sometimes referred to herein as the
     'Corporation') is Milestone Scientific Inc."

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to
be signed by its duly authorized officer this 31st day of October, 1996.


                                   U. S. OPPORTUNITY SEARCH, INC.



                                   By: /s/ Leonard Osser
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Leonard Osser, President
##### 



Exhibit 10(jj) March 10, 2005 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MAJOR MEDICAL & DENTAL BENEFITS Benefits include all medical and dental expenses covered under the PCS US salaried/non hourly
employees Plan. Covered expenses include medical and dental expenses incurred for services rendered
or supplies purchased in the United States. Coverage outside the United States is provided for
emergency services. Individual Deductible Amount
    
    $250Family Deductible Amount
    
    $500Annual Out of Pocket Maximum
    
    $1,250 individual
$2,500 familyPercentage Reimbursements
    
    90%MEDICALMaximum Aggregate per Individual
    
    $1,000,000 per lifetimeAnnual Reinstatement Amount
    
    $10,000Maximum Medical Travel Amount
(per Individual)
    
    NoneDENTALMaximum Dental Amount per Individual
    
    $8,000 per calendar yearOTHER SPECIFIC LIMITS & MAXIMUMS
ARE LISTED BELOW:STANDARD COVERED EXPENSESMaximum Nursing Services Amount
    
    180 day maximum per yearHOSPITAL COVERED EXPENSESHospital Daily Amount
    
    Reasonable and customaryPRESCRIPTION DRUG COVERED EXPENSESIn US
    
    $10/$20 copayIn Canada
    
    Only when travelingOut of Country
    
    Only when travelingMaximum Lifestyle Drugs Amount
    
    $500 per calendar year




---



##### 



PARAMEDICAL COVERED EXPENSESChiropractic Services
    
    Subject to medical necessityPhysiotherapist Services
    
    Subject to medical necessityAcupuncturist Services
    
    Only when used for anesthesiaPodiatrist Services
    
    Subject to medical necessitySpeech Therapist Services
    
    Subject to medical necessityEXTRACARE COVERED EXPENSESConvalescent Hospital Daily Amount
    
    Reasonable and customaryMaximum Number of Days of
Convalescent Hospital Confinement
    
    180 day maximum per yearMaximum Visits to Psychologist
or Social Worker
    
    60 visits per yearMaximum Eye Examination Amount
    
    Reasonable and customary
Once every 12 monthsEyeglass, Frame or Contact Lens Amount
    
    $1,000 per
24 consecutive months
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Colin Binny
President (Chief Executive Officer) and Francis Foong Keong Kwong, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Colin Binny
-------------------------------------
Colin Binny
President (Chief Executive Officer)
February 7, 2005


/s/ Francis Foong Keong Kwong
-------------------------------------
Francis Foong Keong Kwong
Chief Financial Officer
February 7, 2005
# C_2009113EN.01001701.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/17

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 January 2009 — Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-131/08) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(b) - Application for word mark SAFETY 1ST - Lack of distinctive character - Refusal of registration)

2009/C 113/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. (represented by: G. Simon, Rechtsanwältin)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 24 January 2008 in Case T-88/06 Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which the Court dismissed an action for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 11 January 2006 (Case R 616/2004-2) dismissing the appeal against the examiner’s decision which refused to register the word mark ‘SAFETY 1ST’ for goods in Classes 12, 20, 21 and 28 — Distinctive character of a trade mark — Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 21.6.2008.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 12, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ J. Marcus ScrudderJ. Marcus ScrudderChief Financial OfficerCraftmade International, Inc.