alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

February 4, 2005 

 

The Board of Directors 

Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries

 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20057, 333-20073, 333-31398, 333-76096, 333-76654, 333-85518, 333-106270, 333-106271, 333-110706) pertaining to Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Deferred Compensation Plan and Retirement Plan of ourreports dated October 28, 2004 and February 4, 2005 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters endedSeptember 30, 2004 and December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP
#### In the Matter of Dominick Nuccio, Appellant, v City of Rome et al., Respondents.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Shaheen, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
#### Application of James SEXTON for Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12927.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 13, 1960.

*216J. H. Rhinehart, El Reno, for petitioner. Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., John V. Whe-lan, Jr., County Atty., El Reno, for defendant.

BRETT, Judge.

Now on this the 29th day of June, 1960, the application of the petitioner, James Sexton, to be admitted to bail pending trial in the District Court of Canadian County, Oklahoma, for the alleged crime of murder.

Petitioner being represented by counsel, Hugh Rhinehart, and the State of Oklahoma being represented by County Attorney, John V. Whelan, and Sam H. Latti-more, Assistant Attorney General.

 After considering the application, hearing the testimony of' petitioner and after examination of the transcript of the record made in the District Court of Canadian County, Honorable William L. Fogg, presiding judge, and being otherwise advised in the premises, this court finds that tire proof of guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great that the petitioner would receive the death penalty or life imprisonment at the trial on the merits.

Under the provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution, Article II, § 8:

> “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital ■offenses when the proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof is great.”

This court has repeatedly held that under that constitutional provision, one charged with a capital offense is entitled to bail as an absolute right, “unless the proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof is great.” Ex parte Adams, 29 Okl.Cr, 341, 233 P. 788. Upon being well and sufficiently advised in the premises herein, it is adjudged and ordered that the petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $20,000, to. be conditioned as by law provided the same-to be approved by the court clerk of Canadian County, Oklahoma, and upon approval of the same, said clerk to notify the sheriff of said county who is directed to discharge the petitioner from custody to await further orders of the District Court of Canadian County, Oklahoma.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur..
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4263 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small 

company capital formation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4263 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulation A+ Im3 provement Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. JOBS ACT-RELATED EXEMPTION. 

5 Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 

6 77c(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking 

8 ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000, ad9 justed for inflation by the Commission every 2 years 

10 to the nearest $10,000 to reflect the change in the 

11 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 

12 published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’’; and 

13 (2) in paragraph (5)— 

14 (A) by striking ‘‘such amount as’’ and in15 serting: ‘‘such amount, in addition to the ad16 justment for inflation provided for under such 

17 paragraph (2)(A), as’’; and 

18 (B) by striking ‘‘such amount, it’’ and in19 serting ‘‘such amount, in addition to the 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4263 RFS 

1 adjustment for inflation provided for under 

2 such paragraph (2)(A), it’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 15, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofKaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Douglas W. McMinn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March  28, 2006 | /s/ Douglas W. McMinn                  |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|            | Douglas  W. McMinn,                    |
|            | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
February 2023

There were 8 surveillance inspections conducted at 7 different sites for a total of 74

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities. The 

water temperatures continued to decrease due to colder air temperatures. Routine 

harvest continued and the Category 2 site completed harvest. All other sites with fish 

in the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

March 2022 98 0 24709

April 2022 69 0 24778

May 2022 55 0 24833

June 2022 104 0 24937

July 2022 120 1 25057

August 2022 81 0 25138

September 2022 74 0 25212

October 2022 66 0 25278

November 2022 55 0 25333

December 2022 69 0 25402

January 2023 100 0 25502

February 2023 74 0 25576
EXHIBIT 32.1SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thesix-month period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Eddie L. Steiner, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Eddie L. Steiner Eddie L. Steiner  President and  Chief Executive Officer   ***** This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except asotherwise stated in such filing.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4393 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to clarify that employees of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe and 

the Congressional–Executive Commission on the People’s Republic of 

China are to be treated as covered employees for purposes of such 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to 

clarify that employees of the Commission on Security 

and Cooperation in Europe and the Congressional–Executive Commission on the People’s Republic of China are 

to be treated as covered employees for purposes of such 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4393 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE OF EMPLOYEES 

2 OF HELSINKI AND CHINA COMMISSIONS 

3 UNDER CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY 

4 ACT OF 1995. 

5 (a) CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE.—Section 101 of 

6 the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 

7 1301) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Except as otherwise’’ and in9 serting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section: 

13 ‘‘(b) CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE OF EMPLOYEES

14 OF CERTAIN COMMISSIONS.— 

15 ‘‘(1) COVERAGE.—With respect to the China 

16 Commission and the Helsinki Commission— 

17 ‘‘(A) any individual who is an employee of 

18 such Commission shall be considered a covered 

19 employee for purposes of this Act; and 

20 ‘‘(B) the Commission shall be considered 

21 an employing office for purposes of this Act. 

22 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In paragraph (1)— 

23 ‘‘(A) the term ‘China Commission’ means 

24 the Congressional–Executive Commission on the 

25 People’s Republic of China established under 

26 title III of the U.S.-China Relations Act of 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4393 IH

1 2000 (Public Law 106–286; 22 U.S.C. 6911 et 

2 seq.); and 

3 ‘‘(B) the term ‘Helsinki Commission’ 

4 means the Commission on Security and Co5 operation in Europe established under the Act 

6 entitled ‘An Act to establish a Commission on 

7 Security and Cooperation in Europe’ (Public 

8 Law 94–304; 22 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this Act shall take effect as if included in the enactment 

11 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Paul Bonesteel. Anthony R. Triulzi, as Chief Executive Officer of Kingston Hospital, Appellant; Paul Bonesteel, Respondent.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered July 16, 1990 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 77, to appoint a conservator of the property of respondent.

Petitioner appeals Supreme Court’s denial of his application for an order appointing a conservator of the property of respondent. Respondent was 86 years old at the time the petition was filed and has been residing in Kingston Hospital in Ulster County, of which petitioner is the chief executive officer, since August 9, 1988. Respondent is a blind, left-leg amputee who suffers from significant cellulitis on his right leg. The hospital has been unable to discharge respondent because he lived alone and was unable to arrange proper provisions for his care. The petition alleged that the appointment was necessary because respondent "suffered substantial impairment of his ability to care for his property and has become unable to provide for himself by reason of illness, advanced age, and [severe organic dementia]”. The appointed guardian ad litem opposed the petition on the ground, *inter alia,*that respondent was competent to manage his affairs. Supreme Court denied the petition without a hearing and this appeal by petitioner ensued.

We reverse. The appointment of a conservator requires a showing, in this instance, that respondent "has suffered substantial impairment of [his] ability to care for [his] property and that there is a need for the appointment of a conservator” *(Matter of Brown,*157 AD2d 978, 980, *lv denied*76 NY2d 701, *appeal dismissed*76 NY2d 746; *see,*Mental Hygiene Law § 77.01 [1]). Although, as a special proceeding *(see,*Mental Hygiene Law § 77.03 [a]), a petition seeking the appointment of a conservator may be decided upon the papers submitted, where questions of fact exist the Mental Hygiene Law requires, at the very least, that a hearing be conducted *(see,*Mental Hygiene Law § 77.07 [b], [c]; *cf., Matter of Forst,*53 AD2d 842, 843; *Matter of Javarone [DeRizzo]*49 AD2d 788). *362Here, medical reports stating that respondent suffers from an organic mental disorder and "is not competent to make decisions for himself’, as well as the threat to respondent’s assets stemming from the decision to deny him Medicaid benefits and a Medicaid lien against his residence, all suffice to create issues requiring a hearing and, if demanded, possibly a trial of the matter *(see,*Mental Hygiene Law § 77.07 [c]).

Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision.
936 P.2d 197

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

19629

#### Lum v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

February 28, 1997

Order No. 97-19

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Principal Plus Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,417,831
<SECURITIES>                                35,655,852
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,777,291<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,777,291<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,646,730<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,271,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,386,012<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,386,012<F4>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,386,012<F4>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, securities and receivables, total assets include
net unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,629,964, net option premiums
of $365,750 and unrealized gain on Zero-Coupon U.S. Treasury Securities
of $685,465.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,828,856, accrued
brokerage fees of $136,573, accrued administrative fees of
$120,003 and accrued management fees of $34,143.
<F3>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $332,570, net
change in unrealized of $1,249,228, interest income of $2,361,077 and
change in valuation of Yield Pool of $1,703,855.
<F4>Income-Pretax, Income Continuing and Net Income includes minority
interest in income of $(10,711).
</FN>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND
IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      16,064,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,793,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (278,668)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,404,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,802,907
<PP&E>                                       4,347,868
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,081,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,791,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,015,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    43,740,346
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,256,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,791,660
<SALES>                                     37,736,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,736,431
<CGS>                                       17,975,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,466,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               204,503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             426,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,877,203)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,151,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,877,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,725,703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
# C_2020414EN.01003302.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — VE v ESMA

(Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Appraisal report - 2016 appraisal exercise - Plea of illegality relating to the appraisals guide - Manifest error of assessment - Assessment of activities undertaken as staff representative - Procedural irregularity - Termination of the work contract - Insufficient performance during a period of two years)

(2020/C 414/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VE (represented by L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (represented by: A. Lorenzet and N. Vasse, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Applications based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for the period starting on 1 January 2016 and ending on 31 December 2016, of the decision of 14 November 2017 terminating his temporary agent contract and of the decisions rejecting his complaints against those acts and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Annuls VE’s appraisal report for the period starting on 1 January 2016 and ending 31 December 2016; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls VE’s appraisal report for the period starting on 1 January 2016 and ending 31 December 2016;

| 3. | Annuls the decision of 14 November 2017 terminating VE’s temporary agent contract; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Annuls the decision of 14 November 2017 terminating VE’s temporary agent contract;

| 4. | Dismisses the actions as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

| 5. | Orders the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: Ty Cobb Hospital, Lavonia, GA

Owner: Ty Cobb Healthcare Systems, Royston, GA

Site Contractor: Simpson’s Grading, Gainesville, GA

E&S Contractor: Clean Water Consultants, Winder, GA

Product: StormKlear DPS‐MB Kits

Dose rate: 5 mg/L

Description: The new Ty Cobb Regional Medical Center is located off Clear Creek Road at Interstate 

Lavonia, GA and will consolidate the existing Cobb Memorial and Hart County hospitals, providing

services in medical specialties not readily available to many people in northeast Georgia. The challe

was controlling turbidity in the runoff leaving the site with the amount of exposed clay soils. StormK

MB Kits were installed directly on top of 4’ single net excelsior matting in a channel and 12” x 10’

excelsior logs were used as check structures. The DBP‐2100 was installed  just before the 1st check, a

the GelFloc before the 2nd check; the 3rd section was for settling and additional filtration.

Results – Influent: 4000+ NTU; After 3rd Check w/ settling:  32.8 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
EXHIBIT 99

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this  Annual  Report  on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



                             By: /s/ Michael L. Middleton
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Michael L. Middleton
                                 Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                             By: /s/ William J. Pasenelli
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    William J. Pasenelli
                                 Title:   Vice President and Chief Financial
                                            Officer

Date: March 28, 2003