alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5995]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 59--PROVIDING FOR A CONDITIONAL 
ADJOURNMENT OR RECESS OF THE SENATE AND AN ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE OF 
                            REPRESENTATIVES

  Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

                            S. Con. Res. 59

       Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 
     concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any 
     day from Thursday, August 2, 2012, through Tuesday, August 7, 
     2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
     resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee motion to 
     recess or adjourn, or until 2:00 noon on Monday, September 
     10, 2012, or such other time on that day as may be specified 
     by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
     recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly 
     pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
     whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on 
     any legislative day from Thursday, August 2, 2012, through 
     Tuesday, August 7, 2012, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
     concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
     it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 
     2012, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 
     2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
       Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker 
     of the House, or their respective designees, acting jointly 
     after consultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate and 
     the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of 
     the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble at such 
     place and time as they may designate if, in their opinion, 
     the public interest shall warrant it.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian
corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: April 11, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ John Bevan |  |                        
|                      |  |  |  | Name:          |  | John Bevan              |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Title:         |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
F r

o m : B r i a n Sh r

a g er /R T P / U S E PA / U S T o :" H i gg i n s, C o r t n e y" < C o r t n e y

_ H i gg i n s @ o mb

. e o p

. g o

v> C c : R o b er t

J W a y l a n d /R T P

/ U S E PA / U S

, T ere s a C l e m o n s / R T P / U S E PA / U S @ E PA D at e : 11/ 3 0/2 0 11 1 0 : 52 A M S u b j e c t : E O 128 6

6 N E S H AP B o i l er M

a j o r S o u r c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n 2 060

_ A R13 Pr o p os a l 2 0

111 1 29

- R e d l i n e

. d o c

C o r t n e y ,

H er e a re t h e M

a jo r S o u r c e B o i l er p re a mb l e a n d r u l e c l e a n a n d re d l i n e
v er s i o n s i n c o r p o r at i n g i n t er a g e nc y c o mm e n t s

.

( S e e atta ch e d f

i l e : E O 128 6

6 N E S H A P B o i l er M

a j o r S o u r c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n 206 0

_ A R13 P r o p o s

a l 2 011 1 129

- R e d l i n e

. d o c

)

( S e e atta ch e d f

i l e : E O 128 6

6 N E S H A P B o i l er M

a j o r S o u r c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n 206 0

_ A R13 P r o p o s

a l 2 011 1 129 -C l e a n

. d o c

)

P l e a s e l e t m e k n o

w i f y o u h a v e a n y

q u e s t i o n s o r c

o mm e n t s.

T h a n k s !

B r i a n



### P a g e 1 o f 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary M. De Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gary M. De Laurentiis
--------------------------
Gary M. De Laurentiis
Chief Executive Officer

February 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FIANACIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR
ENDED MARCH 31,2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
FORM 10K FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000908179
<NAME> LUCILLE FARMS,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         447,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,225,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   103,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,175,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,911,000
<PP&E>                                      13,489,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,161,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,223,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,966,000
<BONDS>                                      7,970,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,734,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,223,000
<SALES>                                     42,810,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,810,000
<CGS>                                       40,012,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,012,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             691,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
# C_2009297EN.01003501.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/35

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Behmer v European Parliament

(Case F-16/08) (1)

1

(Officials - Procedure for the award of merit points at the European Parliament - Infringement of the obligation to state reasons - Statement of reasons given in the course of the procedure)

2009/C 297/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Joachim Behmer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and R. Ignătescu, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision to award the applicant two merit points for the years 2004 and 2006.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Declares that it is not necessary to rule on the action in so far as it is directed against the decision of the European Parliament of 4 June 2007 awarding Mr Behmer two merit points in respect of the year 2004; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that it is not necessary to rule on the action in so far as it is directed against the decision of the European Parliament of 4 June 2007 awarding Mr Behmer two merit points in respect of the year 2004;

| 2. | annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 26 June 2007 awarding Mr Behmer two merit points in respect of the year 2006; |
| --- | --- |

2.

annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 26 June 2007 awarding Mr Behmer two merit points in respect of the year 2006;

| 3. | orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Mr Behmer; |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Mr Behmer;

| 4. | orders Mr Behmer to bear one half of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders Mr Behmer to bear one half of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 116, of 09.05.2008 p. 32.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5630]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. RANGEL:
        H.R. 6265.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8
```
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Castelle (the Company) on Form 10-K/A
for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott C. McDonald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge: (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  /s/ Scott C. McDonaldName:
  Scott C. McDonaldTitle:
  President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
  April 30, 2007 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Castelle and
will be retained by Castelle and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                             Exhibit 11.1

             Statement Regarding Calculation of Per Share Earnings



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Years Ended December 31,
                                                                       (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                                          1996             1995               1994
                                                                          ----             ----               ----
<S>                                                                <C>                 <C>              <C>
  Primary and Fully Diluted:
  Average shares outstanding ........................................    7,563,600       6,595,728       5,749,999
  Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
   treasury stock method using average market price..................           --              --          42,386
  Total..............................................................    7,563,600       6,595,728       5,792,385
                                                                     =============    =============     ===========
  Net (loss) income                                                    $   (50,852)   $     (4,396)    $     1,836
  Less: preferred stock dividends and accretion......................        6,061             291             348
  Net  (loss) income attributable to common shareholders.............  $   (56,913)   $     (4,687)    $     1,488
                                                                      =============    =============     ==========
  Net (loss) income per common share.................................  $     (7.52)   $      (0.71)    $      0.26
                                                                     =============    =============     ===========
</TABLE>
#### Application of Phillip EIDENMUELLER for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12655.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 8, 1959.

Phillip Eidenmueller, pro se petitioner.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent..

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original action for habeas-corpus brought by Phillip Eidenmueller in which he complains he is being unlawfully .restrained of his liberty by Hon. Joe Harp, Warden of the Oklahoma State Reformatory. In his petition he urges the District Court of Jackson County, Oklahoma, was without jurisdiction to try and sentence him for burglary in the second degree, 21 O.S. 1951 §§ 1435, 1436, on September 25, 1957; to seven years in the state penitentiary, and that he is entitled to a release by habeas corpus.

To his response the Attorney General' attaches a copy of the information, charging the petitioner with the crime of burglary in the second degree, allegedly committed by the petitioner on or about September 9, 1957, of the store of W. H. Palmer, 2200 Broadway, Altus, Oklahoma, by breaking the lock on an outer door, entering therein, and stealing therefrom $97.70 against the will and without the consent of said W. H. Palmer.

It further appears herein that this was. one of nine confessed burglaries participated in by the accused in Jackson County as well as in five other jurisdictions. It further appears that by an agreement with the petitioner and his counsel, Hon. Ryan. *921Kerr, this-'offense was the only one upon which prosecution was instituted. It further appears that in person and while represented by Mr. Kerr, as counsel, the petitioner entered a plea of guilty to said charge, upon which the judgment and sentence, as agreed upon by the parties, was ■entered. It further appears the petitioner was then past twenty-one years of age, and the- minutes of the court reflect that nothing transpired to cause the trial court to lose jurisdiction, and that said judgment 1⁄8 yalid on its face.

Under this record, it clearly appears the trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter, jurisdiction of the person, and authority under the law, 21 O.S.1951 § 1436, to pronounce the maximum sentence of seven years in the penitentiary. The trial court having done nothing to lose jurisdiction, relief by habeas corpus must be accordingly denied. In re Brewster, Okl.Cr., 284 P.2d 755; In re Williams, Okl.Cr., 284 P.2d 1034.

POWELL, P. J. and NIX, J., concur.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Covalent Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period endingDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jorge A. Leon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)                                                                    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)                                                                    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                                                                   |   |
|                                                                   |   |
| /s/ JORGE A. LEON                                                      |   |
|                                                                        |   |
| **Jorge A. Leon Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |   |
|                                                                   |   |
| **March 31, 2003**                                                     |   |
|                                                                        |        |                                                                                                                                                      |  |

NOTE: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Covalent Group, Inc. and will be retained by Covalent Group, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
the Registration Statements No. 333-15469 (Form S-3); No. 333-21127 (Form S-3);
No. 333-06793 (Form S-3); and No. 333-16995 (Form S-3) and to the incorporation
by reference therein of our report dated February 20, 1997, except for Note 13
as to which the date is March 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of SFX Broadcasting, Inc. and Subsidiaries at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                            -----------------
                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 1997
Opinion issued August 13, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 8 - 00 3 79 - CV

——————————— MIRIAM BLANK , Appellant

V. J ACK NUSZEN , Appellee
On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 20 08 - 5 1 454 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Miriam Blank , has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order denying her motion to vacate a “Default Order in S uit To Modify P arent
- C hild R elationship. ” We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction
.2

Generally, appellate courts have jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); N e . Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). And a n appellate court also has jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an interlocutory order if a statute explicitly provides jurisdiction. See CMH Homes v. Perez , 340 S.W. 3 d 444 , 447

– 48 (Tex. 2011 ) ; Jack B. Anglin Co . v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). In this case, t he trial court’s order denying the motion to vacate is neither a n appealable interlocutory order nor a final judgment. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195 ( “A judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the record, except as necessary to carry out the decree.” ) ; see, e.g. , T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 51.014 (authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders). According ly, the Clerk of this Court notified Blank that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless s he caused to be filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing documents showing that the trial court had signed a final, or otherwise appe alable, order or filed a written response showing how this Court has jurisdiction over th e appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a). Blank has not responded
. W e dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and dismiss as moot all pending motions
.3 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Lloyd , Landau, and Countiss
.
### Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 125



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

N o. 

### C V

- 22

- 515

ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD APPELLANT
V.

FREEWAY SURGERY CENTER ; SCOTT SCHLESINGER
, M.D. ; FAIR PARK SURGERY CENTER ; CENTERVIEW SURGERY CENTER ; SOUTH ARKANSAS SURGERY CENTER ; ADVANCED AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER ; EXECUTIVE PARK SURGERY CENTER OF FORT SMITH ; GASTROENTEROLOGY AND SURGERY CENTER OF ARKANSAS ; MOUNTAIN HOME SURGERY CENTER ; HARRISON SURGERY CENTER ; BOZMAN

- HOF EYE CENTER ; PHYSICIANS DAY A/K/A MCFARLAND EYE CENTER ; SPRING CREEK SURGERY CENTER ; TAYLOR PLASTIC SURGERY ; SURGERY CENTER OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ; ADVANCED INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT ; PRECISION SURGICAL OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS ; EXECUTIVE SURGERY CENTER OF LI TTLE ROCK ; CENTRAL ARKANSAS SURGERY CENTER A/K/A ARKANSAS SPINE AND PAIN ; AND ARKANSAS CENTER FOR SURGICAL EXCELLENCE APPELLEE S

AND



### ALAN MCCLA I N, ARKANSAS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

INTERESTED PARTY Opinion Delivered March 1, 2023

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
, FIFTH DIVISION [ NO

. 60CV

- 21

- 2725 ]

HONORABLE WENDELL GRIFFEN
, JUDGE



### MONETARY SANCTION PURGED

### 2 PER CURIAM

In a recent opinion
, th is court accepted court reporter Neva Warford’s plea that she
engaged in contumacious behavior before this court. See Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield

v. Freeway Surgery Center , 2023 Ark. App. 91. Having accepted her guilty plea , we issued

sanctions

. One was a $3,000 monetary sanction agai nst Ms. Warford. Id

. We stated,

however, that it would be purged upon the completion of certain conditions. Id

. Based on

the information now filed of record, we hold that Ms. Warford has met the condition s needed to purge the $3,000 sanction that we conditionally imposed on 15 February 202 3

. Consequently, the monetary sanction is hereby purged, and Ms. Warford has no obligation

to pay any sum in this case

.
G RUBER 

### , J., not participating

.