alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE**

 

Asrequired by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as amended by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I certify that:

 

•                                the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

•                                the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company forthe periods presented therein.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/  Joseph Zumwalt      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph  Zumwalt          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  October 27, 2004  |

 

----
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply574Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Martin Shore (... (not verified)PermalinkOctober 18, 2017 - 1:39pmGreat article. A neighbor worked there when it first opened.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-998

Consolidated: 16-1148

Lower Tribunal No. 14-139-M

________________

Tender Loving Care Garden Supply, Inc., and Claude Halioua,

Appellants,

vs.

Jesher's, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Eric Bitney,

Jean Bitney, and Sheila Lawyer,

Appellees.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig,

Judge.

Cunningham Miller, P.A., and Robert K. Miller, for appellants.

Campbell & Malafy, and John Campbell and Richard Malafy, for appellees.

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and EMAS, JJ.

LAGOA, J.
Appellants, Tender Loving Care Garden Supply, Inc. (“TLC”), and Claude

Halioua (“Halioua”), appeal from two trial court orders.1 Specifically, TLC and

Halioua appeal the trial court’s May 25, 2015, Omnibus Order ruling on multiple

motions of both parties, and the April 18, 2016, Order directing the parties to

specifically perform a property sale transaction pursuant to obligations under a

lease option contract. 

With regard to the trial court’s May 25, 2015, Omnibus Order, because this

matter remains pending in the trial court, we dismiss the appeal as an improper

appeal taken from a non-final, non-appealable order. See Fla. R. App. P.

9.130(a)(3). With regard to the trial court’s April 18, 2016, Order, we affirm.2

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part.

1 This case was consolidated with case no. 3D16-1148, which was a prior petition

for writ of prohibition and mandamus that this Court denied on July 28, 2016.

2 We note that this Order is appealable as a non-final order determining the right to

immediate possession of property under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii).

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *663Curtis O. Nance, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was properly removed from the courtroom after his disruptive and obstreperous conduct, following the court’s adequate admonitions and upon defendant’s request to be returned to the jail *(see,*CPL 260.20; *People v Blake,*158 AD2d 979, 980, *lv denied*75 NY2d 964).

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that (1) the court abused its discretion in granting the People’s motion to consolidate the indictments for trial purposes, (2) he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during summation and (3) he was deprived of a fair trial by numerous errors in the court’s charge *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach those issues in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6]).

Defendant’s conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The court did not err either in admitting the in-court identification testimony of a witness or in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the fruits of the search warrant. Finally, the sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Treasure Mountain  Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  George I.  Norman,  III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certifies  to the best of his  knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   George I. Norman, III
-----------------------------
      George I. Norman, III
      Chief Executive Officer
      May 20, 2003


                                      -1-
# C_2019255EN.01004001.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista v EUIPO — Battista Nino Caffè (BATTISTINO)

(Case T-221/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark BATTISTINO - Earlier EU word mark BATTISTA - Declaration of invalidity - Proof of genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 255/51)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista Srl (Triggiano, Italy) (represented by: V. Franchini, F. Paesan and R. Bia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Battista Nino Caffè Srl (Triggiano, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 January 2018 (Case R 402/2017-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Battista Nino Caffè and Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 January 2018 (Case R 402/2017-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 January 2018 (Case R 402/2017-5);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO and Battista Nino Caffè Srl to bear the costs incurred in the course of the proceedings before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO and Battista Nino Caffè Srl to bear the costs incurred in the course of the proceedings before the Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6. 2018.

---
December 2019

There were 10 surveillance inspections conducted at 9 different sites for a total of 91

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to decrease in response to colder 

air temperatures. Seven of the 9 sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and 

were scheduled for monthly sampling. An additional site was classified as Category 2

(suspect) and further testing is ongoing. The Category 2 site identified in November 

was empty by the end of this month. No cages were confirmed positive.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

January 2019 40 0 20804

February 2019 50 0 20854

March 2019 115 0 20969

April 2019 108 0 21077

May 2019 92 0 21169

June 2019 123 0 21292

July 2019 123 0 21415

August 2019 96 0 21511

September 2019 101 0 21612

October 2019 90 0 21702

November 2019 93 0 21795

December 2019 91 0 21886
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Dewey H. Wratten, Appellant.

County Court, Oneida County,

August 18, 1959.

*491
      *W. Roger Pratt*and *Leo B. Gibbons*for appellant.

*John M. Liddy, District Attorney (Arthur A. Darrigrand*of counsel), for respondent.

John J. Walsh, J.

The order of the court below is affirmed. The affidavit of the Justice of the Peace conclusively shows that defendant was properly advised pursuant to section 335-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in regard to the effect of a plea of guilty.

Defendant’s contention that the said court was without jurisdiction is without foundation. (Code Crim. Pro., § 151-a.)
# C_2021138EN.01001402.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/14

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal procedure against UC, TD

(Case C-769/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive 2012/13/EU - Right to information in criminal proceedings - Article 6 - Right of suspects or accused persons to be informed of their rights - Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Dealing with a case in a reasonable time - National legislation providing for the discontinuance of judicial proceedings in the case of a finding of deficiencies in the bill of indictment by the court - Remission of the matter to the public prosecutor’s office for a new bill of indictment to be drawn up - Admissibility)

(2021/C 138/18)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

UC, TD

Interested party: Spetsializirana prokuratura

Operative part of the order

Article 6(1), (3) and (4), of Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings, the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as the principle of primacy of EU law and the right to respect for human dignity must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, in the case of a deficient bill of indictment the content of which is unclear, incomplete or inconsistent, in no circumstances allows the public prosecutor to remedy the deficiencies by correcting them at the preliminary hearing during which they are established and instead obliges the court to discontinue the judicial proceedings and remit the matter to the public prosecutor’s office for a new bill of indictment to be drawn up.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000880052
<NAME> TOWNE FINANCIAL CORP./OH.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,449
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             810
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     27,889
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,704
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,693
<LOANS>                                         70,553
<ALLOWANCE>                                        267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,167
<DEPOSITS>                                      99,584
<SHORT-TERM>                                        15
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,790
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 123,167
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,045
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,119
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   155
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,319
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,850
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,469
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       16
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    690
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         471
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.57
<LOANS-NON>                                        137
<LOANS-PAST>                                       669
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   264
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  267
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            267
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
32.2**





**SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








The
undersigned officer of Summit Financial Corporation (the “Company”), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report), that, to such
officer’s knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
      February 22, 2005Blaise
      B. Bettendorf, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer











The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Summit Financial Corporation and will be retained by Summit Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 11
                              
          VIEWLOGIC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
            (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Quarter             Six Months
                                         Ended June 30,       Ended June 30,
                                         --------------       --------------
                                          1997     1996        1997    1996
                                          ----     ----        ----    ----
     <S>                                 <C>      <C>         <C>      <C>
     Weighted average number of
     shares outstanding:
       Common stock                      16,715   16,671      16,631   16,901
       Common equivalent shares
         resulting from stock options
         and warrants (treasury stock
         method)                          1,031      930         963      596
       Less: Repurchased shares                                          (243)
                                         ------   ------      ------   ------
                  Total                  17,746   17,601      17,594   17,254
                                         ======   ======      ======   ======
     
     Net income                          $4,170   $2,042      $  925   $2,651
                                         ======   ======      ======   ======
 
     Net income per common share         $ 0.23   $ 0.12      $ 0.05   $ 0.15
                                         ======   ======      ======   ======
</TABLE>
                                  17
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 08, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 08, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0463. TANNER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a TANNER MEDICAL

CENTER-VILLA RICA et al. v. VEST NEWNAN, LLC d/b/a NEWNAN

BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015V32
894 P.2d 112

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Chong

18092

4/04/95

Vacated, Remanded and Affirmed in part
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     QUANTECH LTD.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>            880354
<NAME>                 QUANTECH LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         244,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,332
<PP&E>                                         480,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                (318,067)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,701,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,678,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,134,827
<PREFERRED>                                  1,845,318
<COMMON>                                    17,290,256
<OTHER-SE>                                 (23,247,741)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,701,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,654,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,654,399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,654,399)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.04)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form, 10-Q (the "Report") of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2012 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chua Leong Hin, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

 

 

/s/ Chua Leong Hin                                                                

President, Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2012