CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Northern Sierra Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): 228 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: 4-25-11

Rule Title(s): Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products

Date Submitted to ARB: 5-4-11

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 2-22-10

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Sam Longmire Phone Number: (53 0) 274-9360 x106 E-mail Address: sam@myairdistric t.com

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

This Rule was amended mainly to remove a reference to a rule that is not in the SIP. Also, test metho ds were updated and their full titles were included (per EP A guidance). The rule is intended to satisfy the r equirements of

the 2008 CTG for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Pa rts Coatings. The adoption resolution and staff rep ort for the previous version of the Rule included a Negative De claration for plastic parts coating operations sinc e none that would be subject exist in the NSAQMD. The amended Rule also includes minor improvements to the Defini tions section, minor changes to improve enforceability an d the addition of “etching fillers” to the acid con tent measurement section (5.5).

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name):Variable, depending on formulations of coatings

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: N/A (This is RACT)

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: Any Federal Ozone No nattainment Area within the District (currently only western Nevada County)

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: 1

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: Several emission reduction mechanism s are ioncluded in the rule: 1) Optional control equipment with 90% VOC control efficiency; 2) Work practices, includi ng clean-up practices, to minimize emissions; 3) VOC content limits for co atings and solvents; 4) Test methods; 5) Detailed r ecordkeeping requirements and labeling requirements to ensure co mpliance.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practic e Standards in Section(s): 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 4.2 Rep orting Requirements in Section(s): 4.2CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EV ALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: Administrative