alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11


                                ELEK-TEK, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
             (Dollars in thousands, except per share information)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Years Ended December 31,
                                                   ------------------------------------------------     
                                                       1996                1995             1994     
                                                   ----------          -----------       ----------     
<S>                                           <C>                 <C>                 <C>               
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE           

Net Earnings (Loss)                                 $  (10,563)          $     (299)     $     3,461          
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                                        6,300,000            6,300,000        6,300,000                 

Primary earnings per common share                        (1.68)               (0.05)            0.55          
                                                    ==========           ==========      ===========          

====================================================================================================

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Net Earnings (Loss)                                  $ (10,563)          $     (299)     $     3,461          

Weighted average common shares    
  outstanding                                        6,300,000            6,300,000        6,300,000                 
Stock options assumed to be exercised                     -                    -                -       
Weighted average common shares                       ---------           ----------      -----------
  outstanding, as adjusted                           6,300,000            6,300,000        6,300,000                 
                                                    ==========           ==========      ===========
Fully diluted earnings per common share                  (1.68)               (0.05)            0.55          
                                                    ==========           ==========      ===========
          
====================================================================================================

</TABLE>

Fully diluted earnings per common share was calculated using the treasury stock 
method of accounting for stock options.

In 1995 and 1994, stock options were anti-dilutive.  In 1996, there were 392,500
stock options outstanding which have not been included in the earnings per share
calculation because most of which were anti-dilutive.
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Dennis
P. Calvert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.




Dated:
      November 16, 2009
            
            
            
            By:
            
            /s/ DENNIS
      P. CALVERTDennis
      P. CalvertPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




I,
Charles K. Dargan II, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.




Dated:
      November 16, 2009
            
            
            
            By:
            
            /s/
      CHARLES K. DARGAN IICharles
      K. Dargan IIChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Osbaldo CRUZ DOMINGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-72615.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 5, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Curtis Pierce, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of The District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Donald A. Couvillon, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,** District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

1. The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it declined to reopen the proceedings, because Osbaldo Cruz Dominguez did not support the motion to reopen with previously unavailable evidence. *See Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 784-85 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the movant must support the motion to reopen with new evidence).

2. Cruz Dominguez cannot prevail on his due process claim because he was provided a full and fair hearing in which to demonstrate extreme hardship, and failed to show error or substantial prejudice. *See Larita-Martinez v. INS,*220 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION DENIED.

***

 ThiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00323-CR

Rosa Anita MORENO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 642167

Honorable Melissa Vara, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 29, 2022.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**Certification of Annual Report**

 

I, John F. Clifford, Chairman,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ProCyte Corporation. (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company for thefiscal year period ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

Dated:  March 28, 2003

 

 

|   | /s/ John F. Clifford                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | John F.  Clifford                     |
|   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5329-H5330]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 4 of rule I, the 
following

[[Page H5330]]

enrolled bill was signed by Speaker pro tempore Thornberry on Thursday, 
July 26, 2012:
  H.R. 5872, to require the President to provide a report detailing the 
sequester required by the Budget Control Act of 2011 on January 2, 
2013.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,794,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,135,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,508,620
<PP&E>                                       1,060,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 372,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,734,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,640,589
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,756
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,082,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,734,593
<SALES>                                     11,803,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,803,334
<CGS>                                        8,222,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,222,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,615,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                272,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            252,696
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   252,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Oscar H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

— Order of the Family Court, Bronx County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered January 16, 1990, adjudicating petitioner a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that petitioner committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second, third and fourth degrees and menacing, and which placed him on probation for a period of two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court found that defendant, acting in concert with three of his friends (all of whom are Hispanic) set out to find three other youths (all of whom are black). Defendant and his companions were armed with a .45 caliber semi-automatic handgun, carried by defendant, and a sawed-off .22 caliber rifle (13 inches in overall length with a 3-inch barrel), carried by one of his friends. In the course of the ensuing confrontation, defendant pointed the .45 caliber handgun at David, one of the black youths, who struggled with him for control of the weapon. Defendant thereupon instructed his armed accomplice to shoot David, and the former complied, seriously wounding David in the leg. No evidence was introduced that any of the black youths was armed. The .45 caliber weapon carried by defendant was not recovered by police. On appeal, defendant argues that failure to allege and prove operability of the weapon requires reversal of the fourth degree weapons possession conviction.

Irrespective of the condition of the handgun, it is clear that the .22 caliber sawed-off rifle was fully operable. Defendant’s conviction is supported by his constructive possession of this firearm, based on the court’s finding that he acted in concert with his three friends and "was well aware that there was a loaded sawed-off .22 caliber rifle that was being carried around”.

Defendant’s argument that his actions were justified is raised for the first time upon this appeal and is entirely without substance. It need only be observed that defendant *789and his companions armed themselves with two weapons, initiated the confrontation with the three unarmed youths and failed to avail themselves of the opportunity to withdraw and avoid violence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00868-CR

Vanessa Z. SALAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9364B

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 1, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, and this appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS23-21]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of special closed meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a special closed meeting on this date.                

*Location:*                     Virtual meeting via Webex.                

*Date:*                     December 14, 2023.                

*Time:*                     10:30 a.m. ET.                

## Action and Discussion Item

### Personnel Matter

The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel matter. No action was taken by the ASC.

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-28365 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
22113

#### State v. Kekela

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                  385,804
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                2,979,241
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          28,727,466
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                5,335,700
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  5,474,222
<LOANS>                              42,054,222
<ALLOWANCE>                             409,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       81,307,997
<DEPOSITS>                           45,974,086
<SHORT-TERM>                          7,683,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                  24,913,244
<LONG-TERM>                          16,116,117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                152,043
<OTHER-SE>                           10,268,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       81,307,997
<INTEREST-LOAN>                       3,465,184
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     2,602,786
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        105,045
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                      6,173,015
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    2,052,506
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    3,546,019
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 2,626,996
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       80,940
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       1,564,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,353,677
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              938,063
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            938,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.14
<LOANS-NON>                                   0
<LOANS-PAST>                                  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         130,940
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        412,456
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             2,738
<RECOVERIES>                                266
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       409,984
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 409,984
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,706
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,094
<PP&E>                                       2,728,089
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,395,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,186,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,250,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        649
<COMMON>                                         5,574
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,186,564
<SALES>                                        934,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               934,348
<CGS>                                          109,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  776,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             203,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
J. 

J. 

J. 

suffer prejudice from the delay. Hart v. State,116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 

P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying 

appellant's motion. 3Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4 

Aed-A 

Hardesty 

pc 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Eddie Bell 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

...continued 

2007); Bell v. State,Docket No. 59158 (Order of Affirmance, March 7, 

2012). 

3We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. 

4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# Contents

List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii

1 Introduction 1

P

art I M ethods

Introduction 9 2 Need for public consultation and stated preference 11 3 Stated preference: methods and challenges 19 4 Qualitative methods 31

P

art II A nalysing the results of mi x ing method studies

Introduction 51 5 Interpreting stated preference responses 53 6 Investigating sensitivity to scope 98

P

art III Ex tending the role of the group

- based approach

Introduction 119 7 Constructing better preferences? 121 8 Communal nature of stated preference 149

C onclusion

9 Evaluating and redesigning stated preference valuation 169

References 177 Index 195

Neil A. Powe - 9781845422790 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 05/20/2014 01:45:50PM via free access
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. LABRADOR:
       H.R. 6334.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1
```