alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009180EN.01001501.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)) — David Hütter v Technische Universität Graz

(Case C-88/08) (1)

1

(Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Age discrimination - Determining the pay of contractual employees of the State - Exclusion of professional experience acquired before the age of 18)

2009/C 180/24

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: David Hütter

Applicant:

Defendant: Technische Universität Graz

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) — Interpretation of Articles 1, 2 and 6 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — Prohibition of all discrimination on grounds of age — National legislation which excludes periods of employment completed before the age of 18 from being taken into account for the purpose of determining the remuneration of contractual public servants

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 1, 2 and 6 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, in order not to treat general education less favourably than vocational education and to promote the integration of young apprentices into the labour market, excludes periods of employment completed before the age of 18 from being taken into account for the purpose of determining the incremental step at which contractual public servants of a Member State are graded.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 24.5.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4919]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT

  A message in writing from the President of the United States was 
communicated to the House by Mr. Brian Pate, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Dementia Caregiver Support Intervention.                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2N230, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2879,                         *sandhya.sanghi@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2023.  

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28019 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   HONORING UNITED STATES MARINE CAPTAINS MARK SILVERS AND SEAN GOBIN

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor U.S. Marine Captains 
Mark Silvers and Sean Gobin for their tremendous efforts on behalf of 
our nation's wounded warriors.
  Everyday our men and women in uniform place themselves at great 
personal risk in order to defend our nation's freedom and security. 
Captain Silvers and Captain Gobin are two such heroes who decided to 
continue serving their fellow soldiers after their tours had ended. 
Moved by the number of service members returning home from Iraq and 
Afghanistan with debilitating injuries, the two men pledged their 
efforts to improve the lives of our nation's wounded warriors.
  On March 15, 2012, Captain Silvers and Captain Gobin commenced a 
2,180 mile hike of the Appalachian Trail to raise funds and awareness 
of the debilitating injuries our soldiers have suffered while in 
service to our country. Their journey will come to an end next week at 
the summit of Mount Katahdin in Baxter State Park. As they travelled 
through 14 states, Captain Silvers and Gobin have hosted a number of 
fundraisers at separate VFW posts on behalf of Operation Military 
Embrace; a nonprofit that advocates on behalf of wounded 
servicemembers. All of the proceeds from these events will be used to 
purchase adaptive vehicles for veterans who have sustained multiple 
amputations in the course of their service in Iraq or Afghanistan.
  These men have set a remarkable example for what it means to serve 
our country. Operation Military Embrace and Warrior Hike remind us all 
of our enduring responsibility to honor and care for those who have 
sacrificed so much in defense of our freedom. As the Ranking Member on 
the Health Subcommittee of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, I 
am pleased to join the chorus of congratulations celebrating the 
completion of these men's impressive journey.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me in recognizing Captain Silvers and 
Captain Gobin on achieving so much on behalf of our wounded veterans.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7236

ALBERT THOMAS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BONNIE BOYETTE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-03-637-5-H)

Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Thomas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Albert Thomas, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 886 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 886

   Recognizing November 26, 2016, as ``Small Business Saturday'' and 
supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally owned 
                           small businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2016

Mr. Chabot (for himself, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. King of Iowa, Ms. Judy Chu 
  of California, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Ms. Hahn, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Payne, Mr. 
Huelskamp, Ms. Meng, Mr. Gibson, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Brat, Ms. Clarke of 
   New York, Mrs. Radewagen, Ms. Adams, Mr. Knight, Mr. Moulton, Mr. 
   Curbelo of Florida, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, and Mr. 
Davidson) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing November 26, 2016, as ``Small Business Saturday'' and 
supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally owned 
                           small businesses.

Whereas there are over 28,700,000 small businesses in the United States;
Whereas small businesses represent 99.7 percent of all businesses with employees 
        in the United States;
Whereas small businesses employ over 49 percent of the employees in the private 
        sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses pay over 42 percent of the total payroll of the 
        employees in the private sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses constitute nearly 98 percent of firms exporting goods;
Whereas small businesses are responsible for more than 46 percent of private 
        sector output;
Whereas small businesses generated 63 percent of net new jobs created over the 
        past 20 years; and
Whereas November 26, 2016, is an appropriate day to recognize ``Small Business 
        Saturday'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and encourages the observance of ``Small 
        Business Saturday''; and
            (2) supports efforts--
                    (A) to encourage consumers to shop locally; and
                    (B) to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                owned small businesses and the impact of locally owned 
                small businesses on the economy of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### ROSELYNN D. CONFORTI ET AL. *v.*DONALD B. CHRISTIE ET AL.

(AC 19280)

Lavery, C. J., and Landau and Mihalakos, Js.

Argued June 8

officially released August 8, 2000

*Eddi Z. Zyko,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Anne Kelly Zovas,*for the appellees (defendants).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

This is an action pleaded in eighteen counts, sounding in “wilful and intentional assault and battery, reckless and wanton assault and battery, negligent assault and battery, common-law recklessness, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, breach of contract, respondeat superior and loss of consortium.” The named plaintiff1 appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, Donald B. Christie and Toll Gate Foods, Inc., following the *281court’s granting of a motion to strike the plaintiffs’ amended complaint.

Certain procedural facts are relevant to this appeal. On July 31,1998, the court, *Pellegrino, J.,*in a memorandum of decision, granted the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs’ revised complaint. The plaintiffs pleaded over and filed an amended complaint, which the defendants also moved to strike. On December 17, 1998, the court, *Gill, J.,*granted the motion to strike the amended complaint without writing a memorandum of decision. Thereafter, the defendants filed a motion for judgment, which the court, *Holzberg, J.,*granted on January 19, 1999.

The duty to provide this court with a record adequate for review rests with the appellant. See Practice Book § 61-10. In the present case, the record is inadequate for review because we have not been provided with a written memorandum of decision or a transcribed copy of an oral decision signed by the trial court with respect to the motion to strike the amended complaint. See Practice Book § 64-1. We cannot reach the issue of whether the trial court acted properly because this court “may not surmise or speculate as to the reasons why the trial court granted the motion to strike.”2*Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB*v. *Saucier,*48 Conn. App. 709, 710, 709 A.2d 610 (1998); *Chase Manhattan Bank/City Trust*v. *AECO Elevator Co.,*48 Conn. App. 605, 607-609, 710 A.2d 190 (1998).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

 The named plaintiff, Roselynn D. Conforti, was joined in this action by her husband, the plaintiff Michael F. Conforti, who died on May 3, 1999. The named plaintiff was appointed executrix of his estate. We refer to the named plaintiff in both capacities as the plaintiff on appeal.

2

**During oral argument before us, counsel for the plaintiff argued against a finding of an inadequate record by noting that the memorandum of decision concerning the motion to strike the *revised*complaint was in the record. According to plaintiffs counsel, the court granted the motion to strike the *amended*complaint for reasons identical to the reasons contained in the memorandum of decision that is in the record. The plaintiffs counsel suggested that the memorandum of decision concerning the *revised*complaint constituted an adequate record for the judgment rendered on the striking of the *amended*complaint. Merely to state the argument is to refute it.
# C_2018104EN.01005301.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/53

---

Action brought on 29 January 2018 — NGV v EUIPO (WEIN FÜR PROFIS)

(Case T-57/18)

(2018/C 104/68)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NGV GmbH (Wildeshausen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WEIN FÜR PROFIS’ — Application for registration No 15 326 531

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in Case R 502/2017-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
# C_2020414EN.01001301.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln — Germany) — kohlpharma GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-602/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 34 and 36 TFEU - Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Refusal to approve an amendment to the particulars and documents relating to a medicinal product which is the subject of a parallel import licence - Protection of the health and life of humans - Directive 2001/83/EC)

(2020/C 414/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: kohlpharma GmbH

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 34 and 36 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding the competent authority of a Member State from refusing to approve amendments to the particulars and documents relating to a medicinal product which is covered by a marketing authorisation in another Member State and by a licence for parallel import into the first Member State, on the sole ground that the marketing authorisation of reference in the first Member State has expired and the proposed amendments are based on both the indications authorised in the other Member State for the parallel-imported medicinal product and the indications relating to a medicinal product with the same therapeutic indication, which is covered by a marketing authorisation in the two Member States concerned and which is essentially manufactured with the same active ingredient but in a different pharmaceutical form, where the parallel import licence at issue is still valid and there is insufficient evidence of a risk to the effective protection of the life and health of humans.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
December 2, 2015

 Exemption No. 11594A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−0480

Mr. Patrick Morehead

RDX Aerial Media, LLC

1224 S. Corning Street

Los Angeles, CA 90035

Dear Mr. Morehead:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated August 3, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of RDX Aerial Media, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to 

your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. You requested an 

amendment to add closed-set motion picture and television filming to operations and the DJI 

Inspire 1 and DJI Phantom 3 as additional aircraft.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. The 

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed 

and operating capabilities to those in this petition.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11594

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 
2

granted an amendment to add new aircraft and closed-set motion picture and television 

filming to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11594 remain in effect except 

as follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft. 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Spreading

Wings, DJI Inspire 1, and DJI Phantom 3 when weighing less than 55 pounds 

including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition

or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

permitted. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
<PAGE>   1
                  CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

                                   EXHIBIT 21


The following schedule lists the subsidiaries of Craftmade International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, as of August 31, 1999:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
           Corporate Name                            State of Organization         Percent Owned by Company
           --------------                            ---------------------         ------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                           <C>
Durocraft International, Inc.                            Texas                               100%
C/D/R Incorporated                                       Delaware                            100%
Trade Source International, Inc. (TSI)                   Delaware                            100%
TSI Prime Asia (A wholly-owned subsidiary of TSI)        Hong Kong                           100%
Elitex (A wholly-owned subsidiary of TSI)                Hong Kong                           100%
Prime Home Impression LLC                                North Carolina                       50%
(A 50% owned subsidiary of TSI)
Design Trends, LLC                                       Delaware                             50%
(A 50% owned subsidiary of Craftmade)
</TABLE>