alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009205EN.01001601.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/16

---

Order of the Court of 5 May 2009 — WWF-UK v Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-355/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 - Consultation of Regional Advisory Councils concerning measures governing access to waters and resources and the sustainable pursuit of fishing activities - Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 - Fixing for 2007 of the total allowable catches for cod - Dissenting minority view recorded by members of a Regional Advisory Council in the RAC report on those total allowable catches - Action for annulment of Regulation No 41/2007 brought by such a member - Inadmissibility - Appeal clearly unfounded)

2009/C 205/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: WWF-UK (represented by: P. Sands and J. Simor, barristers, and by R. Stein, solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and A. De Gregorio Merino, Agents), Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Oliver, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of 2 June 2008 in Case T-91/07 WWF-UK v Council by which the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) declared inadmissible an application for the partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006 fixing for 2007 fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (OJ 2007 L 15, p. 1), to the extent that it fixed the ‘total allowable catches’ (‘TACs’) for 2007 in respect of the fishing of cod in the areas covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2004 (OJ 2004 L 70, p. 8) — Requirement that the contested measure must be of individual concern

WWF-UK

Council

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders WWF UK Ltd to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders WWF UK Ltd to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.10

[SYQUEST LOGO APPEARS HERE]          VIA TELECOPIER




June 24, 1998


Econor Investment Corp.
c/o Mr. Moishe Bodner
International Securities Corporation
310 Madison Avenue, Suite 501
New York, NY  10017

Re:  Exercise of Warrants/Issuance of Common Stock

Dear Mr. Bodner:

     This letter confirms that SyQuest Technology, Inc. ("SyQuest") and Econor 
Investment Corp. ("Econor") agree as follows:

1.   Econor will exercise various of its warrants, as more specifically set
     forth on Exhibit A attached hereto, received in connection with assignments
     with various investors of the Company's Convertible Preferred Stock, Series
     2 at various per share warrant exercise prices to acquire 549,622 shares of
     the Company's common stock, for total proceeds of $1,588,628.95 (the
     "Proceeds").

2.   Upon receipt of the Proceeds, plus an additional $86.25 representing the
     par value for an additional 862,492 shares (the "Additional Common Shares)
     of the Company's common stock, the Company will issue a total of 1,412,114
     shares of common stock to Econor.

3.   The Additional Common Shares shall have piggy-back registration rights so
     that they will be registered in a future registration statement consistent
     with existing Company contractual obligations regarding registrations,
     provided however that the Company agrees to register such shares no later
     than 180 days from the date of this letter, subject to delays caused by
     reasonable business considerations.

4.   The Proceeds plus the additional $86.25 will be wire-transferred to the
     following account: Bank of America, 1850 Gateway Blvd., 4th Floor, Concord,
     CA 94520, ABA # 121-000-358, Account # 12334-56287.

<PAGE>
 
5.   The Company will deliver the shares of common stock issued upon exercise of
     the warrants in accordance with the terms of the warrants, and the Company
     confirms that it will direct its transfer agent to deliver such shares
     electronically without a restrictive legend provided that Econor complies
     with the applicable prospectus delivery requirements under the Securities
     Act of 1933 and provides notice to the Company using the attached form.

     The Company acknowledges that Econor is relying on information disclosed in
the Company's public filings with the SEC and confirms that it is aware of no 
material misstatements or omissions in those filings.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:


SyQuest Technology, Inc.                   Econor Investment Corp.



/s/ EDWARD L. MARINARO                     /s/ S. HERIT
------------------------                   -------------------------
Edward L. Marinaro                         Authorized Representative
Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

Exhibit 11.0

                Statement re: Computation of per share earnings


Reconciliations of net income per share and net income per share, assuming
dilution computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000
are as follows (amounts in thousands, except share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended        Six months Ended
                                                           June 30,                June 30,
                                                      -------------------      -------------------
                                                        2001       2000          2001       2000
                                                      -------    --------      --------   --------
<S>                                                   <C>        <C>           <C>        <C>
Numerator:

Net loss-numerator for basic and
     diluted net income (loss) per share               $(1,884)   $    63       $(4,735)   $  (977)
                                                       =======    =======       =======    =======
Denominator:
     Denominator for basic income (loss) per
        common share weighted average shares            29,912     27,853        29,133     27,422

Effect of dilutive securities-stock option                  --      3,755            --         --
                                                       -------    -------       -------    -------
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per
      common share                                      29,912     31,608        29,133     27,422
                                                       =======    =======       =======    =======
</TABLE>

Potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the computation in loss periods,
as their effect would be antidilutive.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1 4 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk April 1 4 , 2017

15 5 568 ( 4 )

ALEXANDER R. SPITZER

, Plaintiff,

SC: 15 5 568

v AGC : 2096

- 14

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defend ant to extend the time for filing

its answer to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The answer will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted o n or before May 9 , 2017.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4321 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4321

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of 
  service-connection of disabilities relating to blast exposures with 
    respect to disability compensation payments by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2017

Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Jeffries, Ms. 
Clarke of New York, Mr. Lance, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. King of New York, Mr. 
Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, 
Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Soto, 
  Mr. Evans, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mrs. 
Radewagen, Mr. Jones, Mr. Sires, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Quigley, 
   Mr. Crowley, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Engel, and Mr. McEachin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of 
  service-connection of disabilities relating to blast exposures with 
    respect to disability compensation payments by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blast Exposure Protection Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION OF DISABILITIES RELATING TO 
              BLAST EXPOSURE.

    Section 1112 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) For the purposes of section 1110 of this title, and subject 
to the provisions of section 1113 of this title, an injury or illness 
of a veteran that is associated with a blast exposure by the veteran 
during active military, naval, or air service shall be considered to 
have been incurred in or aggravated during such active military, naval, 
or air service, notwithstanding that there is no record of evidence of 
such injury or illness during a period of such service.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Dennis Doceti, Respondent.

— Appeal by the People from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), imposed April 12, 1989, which, upon a jury verdict convicting the defendant of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, sentenced him to time served plus five years probation.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, the defendant is adjudged to be a second felony offender, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for resentencing.

The Supreme Court declined to sentence the defendant as a second felony offender upon the ground that his 1987 plea of guilty to burglary in the third degree was constitutionally defective. The court reached this conclusion based principally upon its finding that the plea allocution on the prior felony failed to set forth sufficient facts to establish the defendant’s guilt of burglary in the third degree. We disagree with the court’s conclusion that the defendant’s plea was constitutionally infirm, and accordingly reverse the sentence.

It is settled law that while a factual basis inquiry is one means of assuring that a guilty plea is voluntary and intelligent, it is not a constitutional requirement *(see, People v Nance,*110 AD2d 857; *Willbright v Smith,*745 F2d 779). Thus, a plea of guilty will be sustained in the absence of a factual recitation of the underlying circumstances of the crime if there is no suggestion in the record or dehors the record that the guilty plea was improvident or baseless *(see, People v Richardson,*114 AD2d 980; *People v Perkins,*89 AD2d 956; *see also, People v Lowe,*149 AD2d 939). We find no indication that the defendant’s plea of guilty to the prior crime was improvident or baseless. To the contrary, the record establishes that the defendant’s prior plea was knowingly and voluntarily made upon the advice of counsel whose efforts on the defendant’s behalf resulted in a favorable plea bargain from which the defendant derived a substantial benefit *(see, People v Julian,*145 AD2d 575; *People v Pacheco,*114 AD2d 913). We *257therefore find that the defendant should have been sentenced as a second felony offender. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

|   |           (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   |           (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Registrant. |

| Dated:    September 13, 2006 | /s/ TODD E.   WILLE       |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                              |                           |
|                              | Todd E.   Wille           |
|                              | Chief   Executive Officer |

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-1306]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: AJNA BioSciences has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before February 16, 2024. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before February 16, 2024.
 ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov.*
                         If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on September 20, 2023, AJNA BioSciences, 8022 Southpark Circle, Suite 500, Littleton, Colorado 80120-5659, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
SchedulePsilocybin
7437
IPsilocyn
7438
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture by cultivating research Good Manufacturing Practices whole plant mushrooms containing Psilocybin (7437) and Psilocyn (7438) to support internal research, clinical trials, and analytical purposes as well as to distribute to their customers conducting schedule I clinical research. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Claude Redd, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-27707 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
#### State v. Owenn

18429

3/25/97

Affirmed
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT LINDELL McFADDEN, Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-1675 September 23, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge. Lindell McFadden, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1007 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1007

   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
rename a site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2015

Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
rename a site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE PRESERVATION ACT 
              OF 1992.

    Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 
of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended by striking ``Aviation 
Center'' and inserting ``National Museum''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q (the "Report") of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chua Leong Hin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Chua Leong Hin


Chief Financial Officer


May 16, 2011
October 4, 1999

22148

#### Pitt v. Hayashida

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,917,223
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         195,728,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,185,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,102,223
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          51,122,128
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            49,903,000
<LOANS>                                        140,314,158
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,573,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,762,522
<DEPOSITS>                                     202,883,766
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,651,970
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,376,552
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,850,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,765,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 266,762,522
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,316,082
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,468,534
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    38,354
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,822,970
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,592,723
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,690,827
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,132,143
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      542,920
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  36,089
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,937,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,828,112
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,828,112
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,152,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        7.63
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,380,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                       181,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   922,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,243,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      213,000
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,573,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,573,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,121,000
        


</TABLE>