alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INI TI AL REVI EW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 14 - 0 2 6 8 

Focus Ready Draft 2/10/2014 

ENGI NEER : Prothero \ AFD 

TLV/PEL: 

none establi shed . 

-
Cons umer Use : No 

SAT (concer ns) (0 1/31/201 4) : 

Re l ated Cases a nd Mi se SAT I n f o : 

Ana l ogs : 

Mi grati Pdt moderat e - r api d 

PBT rati ng : P1B1T1 

Heal t h : 2 Dermal, I nha l ation 

Eco : 1 Water (All releas es to water wi t h a CC 1 000 ppb) 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING : l A 

NOTES & KEY 

POLLUT I ON PREVENTION CONSIDERAT I ONS : 

None . 

EXPOSURE- BASED REVIEW: No 
INI TI AL REVI EW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 14- 0268 

USE : 

Number o f Si tes/ Locati on : 1 

BYK USA I nc . Wallingford CT 06492 

Days/yr : 28 

ENVI RONMENTAL RELEASES EST I MATE SUMMARY 

.... 

Ai r - negl igi b l e (l ow VP, liquid) ; Incineration<< 28 , 000 

r e 

Water or I nc i ne r ati o n or Landfill 

High End : 3 . 2E+l kg/si te- day over 28 days/yr from 1 s i t e 

RELEASE TOTAL 

9 . 0E+2 kg/yr - a ll sites 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES EST I MATE SUMMARY 
-
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment, dated
as of December 31, 2016 (the “Amendment”), to Employment Agreement dated as of August 13, 2010 and effective as of
December 31, 2016, as amended to date (collectively, the “Agreement”), is by and between WidePoint Corporation (the
“Company”) and James T. McCubbin (“Executive”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound do hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Effective as of
April 1, 2015, Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the term of Executive’s employment under the Agreement
shall be extended to March 31, 2018.


 


2. Except as expressly
provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement remain unaltered and are in full force
and effect and are expressly hereby ratified and confirmed. The Agreement and this Amendment shall be read and construed as one
agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	WIDEPOINT CORPORATION	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Steve L. Komar	 	 	/s/ James T. McCubbin	 
	Name:	Steve L. Komar	 	 	James T. McCubbin	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	Individually	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness:	/s/ Jin Kang	 	Witness:	/s/ Jin Kang
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5536-H5537]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         JOE BACA MIDDLE SCHOOL

  (Mr. BACA asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)

[[Page H5537]]

  Mr. BACA. Madam Speaker, this Monday, Colton Joint Unified School 
District held a dedication ceremony for the new Joe Baca Middle School 
in Bloomington, California. Next week, 800 students from the 
surrounding communities in Bloomington and Rialto will begin to attend 
classes there.
  I am truly humbled to receive this distinguished honor, and I thank 
the Colton Joint Unified School District. I want to especially 
recognize Superintendent Jerry Almendarez; all of the school board 
members of the Colton Joint Unified School District; Ignacio Gomez, 
whose beautiful artwork will be displayed at the school; and 
Congressman Gary Miller for his bipartisan support.
  Growing up the youngest of 15 children in a poor household, I never 
would imagine that one day I would have a school named in my honor. I 
never thought I would live to see this day. Again, I want to thank 
everyone involved and give a special thank you to my family for their 
continued love and support.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2010100EN.01001201.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/12

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2010 — Messer Group GmbH v Air Products and Chemicals Inc., Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-579/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Word marks Ferromix, Inomix and Alumix - Earlier word marks FERROMAXX, INOMAXX and ALUMAXX - Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark - Relevant public - Degree of similarity - Limited distinctive character of the earlier mark - Likelihood of confusion)

2010/C 100/18

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Messer Group GmbH (represented by: W. Graf v. Schwerin and J. Schmidt, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (represented by: S. Heurung, Rechtsanwältin), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 15 October 2008 in Joined Cases T-305/06 to 307/06 Air Products and Chemicals v OHIM, by which the Court annulled the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 12 September 2006 dismissing the appeals brought by the proprietor of the Community word marks ‘FERROMAXX’, ‘INOMAXX’ and ‘ALUMAXX’ in respect of goods in Class 1 against the Cancellation Division’s decisions which had refused, in part, the opposition filed against the applications for registration of the word marks ‘FERROMIX’, ‘INOMIX’ and ‘ALUMIX’ in respect of goods in Classes 1 and 4

Air Products and Chemicals

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The principal appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The principal appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed.

| 2. | Messer Group GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Messer Group GmbH shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

| 3. | The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 07.03.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5212]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           DOMESTIC TERRORISM

  (Mr. MORAN asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. MORAN. Madam Speaker, I appreciate the moment of silence that we 
extended the victims of the Aurora, Colorado, massacre yesterday. But 
the more telling silence is this body's refusal to address the issue of 
gun control. As a result, a comparable number of Americans will be 
killed by firearms every day. There are 10,000 homicides by firearms in 
America every year, 19 times the number of firearm deaths in all 
civilized countries combined.
  Today is the anniversary of the shooting deaths of two of our Capitol 
policemen. We responded to those killings with remorse and even more 
heartfelt condolences after our colleague Gabby was shot, but 60 more 
multiple murders have been committed since then.
  Thirty-two innocent students at Virginia Tech were massacred, and 
Virginia's legislative body actually weakened the State's gun control 
laws, suggesting that the fault was with the students because they 
weren't carrying firearms themselves. A similar comment was made by a 
Member of this body after the Aurora killings that there should have 
been a shootout in that darkened theater.
  This is domestic terrorism, Madam Speaker. We ought to stop being so 
soft on such crime. If this shooting had been committed by foreign 
terrorists, we'd send the marines out after them, but foreign 
terrorists don't buy their weapons from dealers who are members of the 
NRA.

                 Announcment by the Speaker Pro Tempore

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair would like to remind all persons 
in the gallery that they are here as guests of the House and that any 
manifestation of approval or disapproval of proceedings is in violation 
of the rules of the House.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2019072EN.01003601.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/36

---

Action brought on 21 December 2018 — Bronckers v Commission

(Case T-746/18)

(2019/C 72/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Marco Bronckers (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Kreijger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the (implied) decision of the Commission of 17 October 2018 rejecting, under Regulation (EC) 1049/2001, (1) the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents relating to the Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks; (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the (implied) decision of the Commission of 17 October 2018 rejecting, under Regulation (EC) 1049/2001, (1) the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents relating to the Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks; (2)

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission violated Article 8 (3) of Regulation 1049/2001 by failing to decide within the prescribed time limit.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

(2)  OJ 1997 L 152, p. 15.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5687]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RESTORING CONFIDENCE IN OUR DEMOCRACY ACT

  (Mr. DINGELL asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DINGELL. Citizens United v. FEC is one of the most destructive 
Supreme Court decisions in the history of this country.
  It unleashed the floodgates for unlimited expenditures on elections; 
ignored factual records; disregarded congressional intent; and opened 
up the floodgates of crime, misbehavior, and scandal. In addition to 
that, people are going to be spending money without knowing who is 
having it spent, why, or for how much or by whom.
  That is why, today, I, along with a number of my colleagues, will be 
introducing the Restoring Confidence in Our Democracy Act. This 
legislation makes findings of fact about the negative effects of 
unlimited spending which the Court cannot ignore. It reinstates the law 
that was in place on the day before Citizens United was adopted by the 
Court. It prohibits corporate spending in elections, and it subjects 
super PACs to $5,000 contribution limits.
  Don't wait for a constitutional amendment to undo Citizens United. 
Support the Restoring Confidence in Our Democracy Act, and let us do it 
by an enactment of Congress preceded by the necessary findings pointing 
out the evils of this scandal. We will be back in less than 30 days, 
and we are going to find out after the primary elections and after the 
general election what an outrage this is.

                          ____________________
```
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sweetheart Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period  ending  September 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Hans H. Heinsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





/s/ Hans H. Heinsen
-------------------
Hans H. Heinsen
Chief Financial Officer
December 11, 2003
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC., 

Appellant

v.

SYNOPSYS, INC., 

Cross-Appellant

______________________

2023-1421, 23-1594

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

01215.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-1421 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2024
2 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC. V. SYNOPSYS, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 10, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 10, 2024

Case: 23-1421 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2024
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
and the following  Registration  Statements of Cornerstone  Realty Income Trust,
Inc. of our report dated January 22, 1998, included in the 1997 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc.:

     Registration Statement Number                          Description

          333-24871                      Form S-8,  pertaining  to the Company's
                                         1992   Non-Employee   Directors   Stock
                                         Option   Plan,   Special   Non-Employee
                                         Directors   Stock   Option   Plan   and
                                         Non-Employee Directors Fees Plan

          333-24875                      Form S-8,  pertaining  to the Company's
                                         1992 Incentive Plan

          333-34441                      Form S-3, Shelf Registration Statement,
                                         pertaining to the  registration of $200
                                         million  of  Common  Shares,  Preferred
                                         Shares and Debt Securities.

          333-19187                      Form S-3,  pertaining  to the Company's
                                         Dividend    Reinvestment    and   Share
                                         Purchase Plan

Our audits also included the financial  statement schedule of Cornerstone Realty
Income Trust, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the  responsibility of
the Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion,  the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                           /s/    Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 25, 1998
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                               |                                                                           |                                      |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                      |                                 |
| Dated:              August 9, 2007 |                                                                                | /s/              Mark              J. Ahn |
|                               | Mark                J. AhnPresident                and Chief Executive Officer |

|                  |                                                                                      |                     |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|             |                                                                                 |                |
| Dated: August 9, 2007 |                                                                                           | /s/ John P. Iparraguirre |
|                  | John                P. IparraguirreVice                President, Chief Financial Officer |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 15, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 149 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-126, CP2024-132.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28064 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 140 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-116, CP2024-121.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28055 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<page>
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seamless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Reda, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Albert Reda
---------------
Albert Reda,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
June 8, 2009