alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Mack M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

— In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Sparrow, J.), dated September 12, 1990, which, upon a fact-finding order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), dated August 14, 1990, made after a jury trial conducted in the Supreme Court, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the New York State Division for Youth, Title III, for a period of 18 months with the first six months in a residential facility.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant contends that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion by denying him credit for the 14-month period he remained in secure detention pending disposition of this matter. We disagree. As amended in 1987, Family Court Act § 353.3 (5) requires that the period of a juvenile’s placement be reduced by the amount of time spent by him in detention pending disposition "unless the court finds that all or part of such credit would not serve the needs and best interests of the [appellant] or the need for protection of the community” (Family Ct Act § 353.3 [5]). Upon our review of the record, we find that the Family Court properly determined that an award of predetention credit would result in a period of placement of insufficient duration to serve the best interests of the appellant or to adequately protect the community. In this regard, we note that both the probation *870officer assigned to the appellant’s case and the Mental Health Services psychologist who examined him shortly before the dispositional hearing recommended that the appellant be placed in a structured and secure setting outside of the community, where he could continue to receive educational remediation and counseling. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Family Court’s dispositional order. Kooper, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 18, 2005



|    |  |                                                
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Marty E. Adams                             
|    |  | Marty E. Adams                                 
|    |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           REGULATORY REFORM

  (Ms. FOXX asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Ms. FOXX. The President's policies have failed and are making the 
economy worse.
  Since President Obama took office, we've seen a 52 percent increase 
in completed regulations deemed ``economically significant,'' which 
means they cost the economy at least $100 million a year. We can't 
create a fair system for job creators when the government keeps 
changing the rules. We can't help the job seeker by punishing the job 
creator with more government red tape.
  How can someone who believes that small business owners didn't even 
build their own businesses understand the effects of red tape? He 
can't.
  That is why House Republicans passed the Red Tape Reduction and Small 
Business Job Creation Act--a combination of pro-growth bills aimed at 
cutting red tape to make it easier for small businesses to create more 
jobs. In order to grow more jobs for the American people, we need to 
shrink the amount of red tape coming from Washington.

                          ____________________
```
#### In the Matter of W.W.W. Associates, Inc., Petitioner, v Antonia Rettaliata et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Huntington, dated June 6, 1989, which, after a hearing, granted an application by the Huntington Historic Preservation Commission to designate the petitioner’s premises an historic landmark pursuant to Huntington Town Code § 198-40.3.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The record of this proceeding clearly demonstrates that the respondent Town Board of the Town of Huntington properly followed the procedures set forth in Huntington Town Code § 198-40.3 in reaching its determination to designate the petitioner’s property, which is known as the Carman-Gustivan-Regan House and is located in Dix Hills in the Town of *134Huntington, an historic landmark. We also find that the Town Board’s determination was based upon substantial evidence *(see,*CPLR 7803 [4]).

The petitioner’s contention that the determination of the Town Board constituted an unconstitutional taking of its property is without merit. The petitioner failed to establish either that it is precluded from using the property in a manner to which it is reasonably adapted, or that the property’s economic value, or all but a bare residue thereof, has been destroyed by its designation as an historic landmark *(see, de St. Aubin v Flacke,*68 NY2d 66, 76-77).

The petitioner’s claim that the Town Board improperly considered a post-hearing memorandum of the Huntington Historic Preservation Commission in reaching its determination is without merit. The Town Board had announced at the hearing that the record would remain open for the introduction of further relevant information. In addition, the petitioner’s attorneys also submitted their own post-hearing memorandum attacking the Commission’s assertions. Under the circumstances, the Town Board properly considered the Commission’s post-hearing submissions *(cf., Matter of Stein v Board of Appeals,*100 AD2d 590). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00020

- CR

Ex parte Gregary A. Turner, Sr. §

§

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County

(D213W010816

- 1343101

- A)

April 12, 201 8

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record o n appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5729]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     TRIBUTE TO STEPHEN GOODFELLOW

 Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, today I wish to recognize Stephen 
Goodfellow, an intern in my Sioux Falls, SD, office, for all of the 
hard work he has done for me, my staff, and the State of South Dakota 
over the past several weeks.
  Stephen is a graduate of Boiling Springs High School in Boiling 
Springs, PA. Currently, he is attending the University of South Dakota 
where he is majoring in economics and finance. He is a hard worker who 
has been dedicated to getting the most out of his internship 
experience.
  I would like to extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to Stephen 
for all of the fine work he has done and wish him continued success in 
the years to come.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2020414EN.01001701.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/17

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Vikingo Fővállalkozó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-610/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 168, 178, 220 and 226 - Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality - Right to deduct VAT - Refusal - Conditions for the existence of a supply of goods - Evasion - Proof - Penalty - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective judicial remedy)

(2020/C 414/21)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vikingo Fővállalkozó Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with the principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality, must be interpreted as precluding a national practice by which the tax authorities refuse a taxable person the right to deduct the value added tax paid on purchases of goods which were supplied to him or her, on the ground that credence cannot be given to the invoices relating to those purchases because, first, the manufacture of those goods and their supply could not, as the necessary material and human resources were lacking, have been effected by the issuer of those invoices and the goods were therefore, in fact, purchased from an unidentified person, secondly, the national accounting rules were not complied with, thirdly, the supply chain which led to those purchases was not economically justified and, fourthly, irregularities vitiated certain earlier transactions forming part of that supply chain. In order to provide a basis for such a refusal, it must be established to the requisite legal standard that the taxable person actively participated in fraud or that that taxable person knew or should have known that those transactions were connected with fraud committed by the issuer of the invoices or any other trader acting upstream in that supply chain, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88136-88137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28202]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  2 p.m., Monday, December 18, 2023.

PLACE:  1255 Union Street NE, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20002.

STATUS:  Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

[[Page 88137]]


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Regular Board of Directors meeting.
    The Interim General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that 
in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4) permit 
closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

<bullet> Executive (Closed) Session

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session
III. Executive Session: Report from CEO
IV. Executive Session: Report from CFO
V. Executive Session: GAO Workplan Update
VI. Executive Session: Report from Interim General Counsel
VII. Executive Session: Report from CIO
VIII. Executive Session: NeighborWorks Compass Update
IX. Action Item: Approval of Meeting Minutes--October 2 Audit Committee 
Meeting and October 19 Regular Board of Directors Meeting
X. Action Item: Election of Deputy Secretary Adrianne Todman as Board 
Vice Chair
XI. Action Item: Delegation of Authority--Venue Contracts--Philadelphia 
(February 2025) and New Orleans (August 2025)
XII. Discussion Item: November 29 Audit Committee Meeting
XIII. Discussion Item: Delegation of Authority--Future Venue Contracts
XIV. Discussion Item: Strategic Planning Process
XV. 2024 Board Meeting Schedule
XVI. Management Program Background and Updates
Other Reports
    a. 2024 Board Calendar
    b. 2024 Board Agenda Planner
    c. CFO Report
    i. Financials (through 9/30/23)
    ii. Single Invoice Approvals $100K and over
    iii. Vendor Payments $350K and over
    iv. Exceptions
    d. Programs Dashboard
    e. Housing Stability Counseling Program (HSCP)
    f. Strategic Plan Scorecard--FY23 Q3

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:  Everything except the Executive (Closed) 
Session.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:  Executive (Closed) Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 
568-2560; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#19736a60756f7c6a6d7c6b59776e37766b7e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc968f85908a998f88998ebc928bd2938e9b">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jenna Sylvester,
Paralegal.
[FR Doc. 2023-28202 Filed 12-18-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5729]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         TRIBUTE TO TYLER FITZ

 Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, today I recognize Tyler Fitz, an 
intern in my Washington, DC, office, for all of the hard work he has 
done for me, my staff, and the State of South Dakota over the past 
several weeks.
  Tyler is a graduate of Roosevelt High School in Sioux Falls, SD. He 
is also a graduate of South Dakota State University where he majored in 
history and Spanish. He is a hard worker who has been dedicated to 
getting the most out of his internship experience.
  I extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to Tyler for all of the 
fine work he has done and wish him continued success in the years to 
come.

                          ____________________
```
**Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 November 2009 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐154/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Sixth VAT Directive – Article 2 and Article 4(1), (2) and (5) – Harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment – Taxable persons – Activities or operations carried out by ‘registradores de la propiedad’ (land registrars) acting as settlement agents in
charge of settlement offices of a mortgage district – Economic activities – Activity carried out independently – Public-law bodies carrying out activities in connection with their public duties – Infringement of Community law attributable to a national court

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Application initiating proceedings – Statement of subject-matter and pleas in
law – Formal requirements – Unambiguous wording of the form of order sought by the applicant (Art. 226 EC, Statute of the
Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 38(1)(c)) (see paras 60, 63, 67)*

2.                     *Tax provisions – Harmonisation of laws – Turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax – Economic activities carried on
independently for the purpose of Article 4 of the Sixth Directive (Council Directive 77/388, Arts 2 and 4(1) and (2)) (see
paras 90, 93, 97, 103, 107, 109, 118, 127 and operative part)*

3.                     *Member States – Obligations – Failure to fulfil obligations – Liability (Art. 226 EC) (see paras 125-126)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 2 and 4(1) and (2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) – Taxable persons – Activities or operations carried out by ‘registradores de la propiedad’. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by considering that the services supplied to an Autonomous Community by ‘registradores de la propiedad’ acting as settlement agents in charge of a settlement office of a mortgage district (‘oficina liquidadora de distrito hipotecario’) are not subject to value added tax, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 and Article 4(1) and (2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
22073

#### State v. Propios

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: December 14, 2007 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       | 
|------------------------ | ----------------------- | 
|                         | Todd E. Wille           | 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

30

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. AMODEI:
       H.R. 6282.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The constitutional authority on which this bill rests is 
     the power of Congress to make rules for the government and 
     regulation of the land and naval forces, as enumerated in 
     Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 of the United States 
     Constitution.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, SEP-11: NCI Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, March 7, 2024, 10:00 a.m. to March 7, 2024, 1:30 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W238, Rockville, Maryland, 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 20, 2023, FR Doc. 2023-27963, 88 FR 88100.                

This meeting is being cancelled and will be rescheduled with a new contact person.

Dated: December 20, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28371 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P