alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2003 of Prism Software Corporation (the "COMPANY") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.

Date:  April 14, 2004                                 /s/   David Ayres
                                                      ---------------------
                                                            President

                                                      /s/   Michael Cheever
                                                      ---------------------
                                                            Controller
# C_2008128EN.01002001.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/20

---

Appeal brought on 25 February 2008 by Miguel Cabrera Sánchez against the judgment delivered on 13 December 2007 in Case T-242/06 Miguel Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM and Industrias Cárnicas Valle, S.A.

Miguel Cabrera Sánchez

OHIM and Industrias Cárnicas Valle, S.A.

(Case C-81/08 P)

(2008/C 128/34)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Miguel Cabrera Sánchez (represented by: J.A. Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni, abogados)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Industrias Cárnicas Valle, S.A.

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2007 in case T-242/06 seeking annulment of the decision in question since the appellant claims that the marks EL CHARCUTERO (appellant) and EL CHARCUTERO ARTESANO (respondent) are clearly incompatible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2007 in case T-242/06 seeking annulment of the decision in question since the appellant claims that the marks EL CHARCUTERO (appellant) and EL CHARCUTERO ARTESANO (respondent) are clearly incompatible;

| — | Make an order for costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Make an order for costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant claims, contrary to the judgment under appeal, that the Community trade mark ‘El chacutero Artesano’ falls under the prohibition in Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 40/94 (1) since, upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark, in this case, the Spanish mark ‘El Charcutero’, the trade mark applied for is not to be registered if, because of its identity with or similarity to the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected, in this case, Spain. The likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1993 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
" ' U.S
. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary Of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave . , S.E. Washington , DC 20590

January 6 , 2014 Mr
. Mark W
. Atwood Counsel ~br Western Global Airlines , LLC. Cozen O ' , Connor 1627 I Stteet NW Washington , DC 20006 RE: Doctts DOT-OST-2013-0105 and DOT-OST-2013-0106

I Applicatl on of Western Global Airlines , LLC for certificates of public convenience and neces s ity to engage in interstate and foreign h , . . carter cargo air transportation Dear 

# 1

Atwood: Thank ~ ou for the information you have pro vided on behalf of Western Global Airlines , LLC
. ( " WesteF ") , for the determination of its fitness to operate interstate and foreign charter cargo air transp0xr-ation. We have determined that we will need additional andl or clarifying information before we may complete our review
. I ask that y ou respond fully to our request within 30 day s of the d ' te of this letter. 1. The resumes of the following Western personnel contain gap s in their unemployment. Please explain or provide updated resumes: a . Mrs. Carmit Neff (2007-2010 ) b. Mr
. Thomas Quehl (May 2 012-ApriI2013 ) c . Mr. George Boyko ( 1997-1999) 2. Please pro vide updated financial information regarding Western ' s ability to meet the Department ' s financial fitness test in dockets DOT-OST-2013-0105 and DOT-OST2013-0106. If Western require s confidential treatment of this information , please pro vide it pursuant to14 CFR 302
. 1 2 (Rule 12) of our Procedural Regulations
. As is the Department's practice , further processing of Western's application will be deferred pendirg receipt of this information. In addition , please remember that Western should promptly prov ~ ' e the Department with any information regarding changes it may undergo in areas affec ing its fitness (i. e ., manag ement , operating plans or financial condition , compliance disp [ sition , or ownership ) while its application is under review by the Department.

----------2 If you have any questions regarding this letter or the requested information, please contact me at (202) 366-9998
. Sincerely, 

# ()~ 6 ~ Catherine J. O ' Toole Analyst , Air Carrier Fitness Division Office of Aviation Analysis

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2013-0105 Docket DOT-OST-2013-0l06 Mr
. William Roy al , FAA Principal Operations Inspector Tampa Flight Standards District Office
##### 



ARBITRATION AND NOTICE OF FINAL AGREEMENT
 To:
    
    Craftmade International, Inc., a Delaware corporation
650 S. Royal Lane Coppell, Texas 75019
(collectively, whether one or more, Borrower)
 Lender Loan
 ARBITRATION
 Loan Documents




---



##### 



FACSIMILE DOCUMENTS AND SIGNATURES
 fax
 WAIVER OF RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY
  NOTICE OF FINAL AGREEMENT
 Other Obligors Written Loan Agreement
  2




---



##### 



THE WRITTEN LOAN AGREEMENT REPRESENTS THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE
CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES.
 THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
  BORROWER
    
    
    
    LENDER:CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
    
    
    
    THE FROST NATIONAL BANK,a Delaware corporation
    
    
    
    a national banking associationBy:
    
    /s/ James R. Ridings
    
    
    
    By:
    
    D. Michael RandallJames R. Ridings, President
    
    
    
    
    
    D. Michael Randall, Senior Vice PresidentOTHER OBLIGORS:DESIGN TRENDS, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    
    Craftmade International, Inc.,a Delaware corporation, ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ James R. RidingsJames R. Ridings, PresidentDUROCRAFT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,a Texas corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Brad HeimannBrad Heimann, Secretary
 3




---



##### 



TRADE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,a California corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Brad HeimannBrad Heimann, SecretaryC/D/R INCORPORATED,a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Clifford CrimmingsClifford Crimmings, V.P. Marketing
 4
# C_2009267EN.01002001.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht (Germany)) — Wasser- und Abwasserzweckverband Gotha und Landkreisgemeinden (WAZV Gotha) v Eurawasser Aufbereitungs- und Entsorgungsgesellschaft mbH

(Case C-206/08) (1)

1

(Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors - Public service for the distribution of drinking water and the treatment of sewage - Service concession - Definition - Transfer to the supplier of the risk connected with operating the service in question)

2009/C 267/34

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Thüringer Oberlandesgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wasser- und Abwasserzweckverband Gotha und Landkreisgemeinden (WAZV Gotha)

Applicant:

Defendant: Eurawasser Aufbereitungs- und Entsorgungsgesellschaft mbH

Defendant:

Intervening parties: Stadtwirtschaft Gotha GmbH, Wasserverband Lausitz Betriebsführungs GmbH (WAL)

Intervening parties:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Thüringer Oberlandesgericht — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(a) and (d) and 1(3)(b) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 1) — Call for bids for the provision, in the form of a public service concession, of a service to the public in respect of the production, transport and distribution of drinking water and in respect of the disposal and treatment of sewage — Criteria for distinguishing a public service contract from a public service concession

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In relation to a contract for the supply of services, the fact that the supplier does not receive consideration directly from the contracting authority, but is entitled to collect payment under private law from third parties, is sufficient for the contract in question to be categorised as a ‘service concession’ within the meaning of Article 1(3)(b) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, where the supplier assumes all, or at least a significant share, of the operating risk faced by the contracting authority, even if that risk is, from the outset, very limited on account of the detailed rules of public law governing that service.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5691]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008171EN.01002602.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/26

---

Action brought on 7 May 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-190/08)

(2008/C 171/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and R. Troosters, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, or in any event by not communicating such measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 10 October 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5537]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             SEQUESTRATION

  (Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Madam Speaker, sequestration--that's the 
bogeyman Republicans created last year when they refused, for the first 
time in American history, to allow a clean debt ceiling vote. So they 
formed a supercommittee which they doomed to failure when they refused 
to consider a balanced approach that included revenue and spending 
cuts. And now they decry the impending $1.2 trillion cuts they 
fashioned and voted for as a crisis for national defense. This gives 
chutzpah a bad name.
  If Senators McCain, Graham, and Ayotte want to resolve this crisis in 
their town hall meetings--that they helped create--join me in calling 
our House Republican leadership to cancel the 5-week August recess and 
solve this solvable problem.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2021182EN.01000401.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin — Germany) — FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg

(Case C-365/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Direct payments - Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Article 24 - Young farmer having received an initial allocation of payment entitlements - Article 30(6) - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 - Article 28(2) - Further allocation of payment entitlements from the national reserve)

(2021/C 182/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FD

Defendant: Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg

Operative part of the judgment

Article 30(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, read in conjunction with Article 28(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation No 1307/2013 and amending Annex X to that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that a young farmer, within the meaning of Article 30(11)(a) of Regulation No 1307/2013, read in conjunction with Article 50(2) of that regulation, who has already received, under Article 24 of that regulation, an initial allocation of payment entitlements in respect of the eligible hectares which he or she has declared at the time of his or her application is entitled to receive, subsequently, a further allocation of payment entitlements from the national reserve equal to the number of additional eligible hectares that he or she now holds and for which he or she has not received any payment entitlement. That right is subject to the existence of sufficient available funds in the national or regional reserves. If that is not the case, the allocation must be made in such a way as to ensure the equal treatment of farmers eligible for entitlements under Article 30(6) of Regulation No 1307/2013 and to avoid distortions of the market and of competition.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

December 12, 2016

 

Claudia Drayton,

 

In appreciation for your continued support of Sunshine Heart Inc., the company is offering you a retention bonus. The Company is offering this retention bonus because it wants to reward you with additional compensation should certain conditions as specified below be satisfied.

 

You will receive a lump sum retention bonus of $50,000 (less applicable withholdings and deductions) if each of the following conditions are satisfied:

 

1.                        You sign this memo in the space provided below and return it to me by no later than Friday, December 16, 2016,

 

2.                        Sunshine Heart receives a minimum of $5 million in equity financing by June 30, 2017,

 

3.                        You must not resign your employment or be terminated for misconduct or poor performance (in each case, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion) prior to June 30, 2017,

 

4.                        You must perform the tasks and responsibilities that are assigned to you to the Company’s satisfaction through June 30, 2017, and

 

If the conditions for you to receive the retention bonus are met, the retention bonus would become payable to you on July 15, 2017 in accordance with normal payroll procedures.

 

Please note that your employment remains “at will,” meaning either you or the Company have the right to terminate your employment without prior notice at any time and for any reason.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

John Erb
 Chairman of the Board and CEO

 

EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE:

 

Although I understand that my employment is at-will, and that this memo does not change my at-will status, by signing below I represent that I currently intend to continue employment with the company in my current position through at least June 30, 2017. I understand that the company is offering the retention bonus described above in reliance upon my representation.

 

 

	
Employee Signature:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 99

                  FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                           7 BULFINCH PLACE, SUITE 500
                              POST OFFICE BOX 9507
                           BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114



March 29, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2001;
       Confirmation of Receipt of Assurances from Arthur Andersen LLP

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Our auditors, Arthur Andersen LLP, have represented to us in a letter
dated March 29, 2002 that (i) their audits of the financial statements included
in Item 8, Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K were subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, (ii) there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen
personnel working on the audit, and (iii) there was availability of national
office consultation. We do not have foreign affiliates, so the assurances from
Arthur Andersen as to foreign affiliates are not applicable to us.


                                         Respectfully submitted,



                                         Thomas C. Staples
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer













                                       52
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 55872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Mexico Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New Mexico Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held at the 
Albuquerque Hispano Chamber of Commerce, Lockheed Martin Board Room, 
1309 Fourth Street, SW., Albuquerque, NM 87102 and will convene at 2 
p.m. on Thursday, September 29, 2011. The purpose of the meeting is to 
discuss civil rights issues in the state and select a project topic.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by October 31, 2011. 
The address is Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 999- 18th Street, Suite 
1380S, Denver, CO 80202. Comments may be e-mailed to ebohor@usccr.gov. 
Records generated by this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at 
the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office 
at the above e-mail or street address.
    Deaf or hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, September 6, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-23064 Filed 9-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# C_2010161EN.01001001.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Vera Mattner v Finanzamt Velbert

(Case C-510/08) (1)

(Free movement of capital - Articles 56 EC and 58 EC - Gift tax - Land on which a building has been constructed - Allowance to be set against the taxable value - Different treatment of residents and non-residents)

(2010/C 161/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vera Mattner

Defendant: Finanzamt Velbert

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Articles 39 EC and 43 EC and of Article 56 EC in conjunction with Article 58 EC — National legislation on the taxation of gifts of land fixing the tax-free part of the value of the land at EUR 1 100 if the donor and the acquirer are resident in another Member State, whereas the tax-free part is EUR 205 000 if either the donor or the acquirer is resident in national territory.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC in conjunction with Article 58 EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that, for the calculation of gift tax, the allowance to be set against the taxable value in the case of a gift of immovable property in that State is smaller where the donor and the donee were resident in another Member State on the date of the gift than the allowance which would have applied if at least one of them had been resident in the former Member State on that date.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

---