alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nicholas Rodriguez, Appellant, v Geraldine Rodriguez, Respondent.

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Charde, J.H.O.), dated September 5, 1989, which, *inter alia,*directed him (1) to pay to the defendant wife the entire balance in the parties’ joint savings account, (2) to execute a deed conveying his entire interest in the parties’ Puerto Rican condominium to the wife, and (3) to pay to the wife $10,300 in counsel fees pursuant to a pendente lite order of the same court, entered November 27,1989.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

A review of the instant record leads us to the conclusion that the pendente lite award to the wife of $10,300 in counsel fees and expert fees is appropriate. The wife, as the moving party, set forth in detail (1) the nature of the marital property involved, (2) the difficulties involved in identifying and evaluating it, (3) the services rendered and to be rendered and an estimate of the time involved, and (4) her financial status *(see, Ahern v Ahern,*94 AD2d 53). In opposing the wife’s motion, the husband did not set forth any evidence regarding his own financial circumstances or the relative merits of his position *(cf, McCarthy v McCarthy,*156 AD2d 346). Contrary to the *158husband’s assertion, this motion was not brought for the sole purpose of delaying the trial. Both parties agreed to permit the court to refer the issues in dispute to a Judicial Hearing Officer to hear and determine those issues.

Upon our review of the record we also find that the court equitably distributed the parties’ property, taking into consideration the credible evidence adduced at trial and the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (d). Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# C_2008183EN.01001203.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (The Netherlands) lodged on 25 April 2008 — Kloosterboer Services B.V. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, kantoor Laan op Zuid

(Case C-173/08)

(2008/C 183/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (The Netherlands)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kloosterboer Services B.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, kantoor Laan op Zuid

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2004 (1) of 1 March 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid in so far as, according to that Regulation, subheading 8414 59 30 of the Common Nomenclature covers the goods described in paragraph 2.7 (2) above? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2004 (1) of 1 March 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid in so far as, according to that Regulation, subheading 8414 59 30 of the Common Nomenclature covers the goods described in paragraph 2.7 (2) above?

1

2

| 2. | If the Regulation is invalid, can the Common Customs Tariff then be interpreted to mean that those goods should be classified as ‘parts and accessories of the machines of heading 8471’ as referred to in subheading 8473 30 90 of the CN? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the Regulation is invalid, can the Common Customs Tariff then be interpreted to mean that those goods should be classified as ‘parts and accessories of the machines of heading 8471’ as referred to in subheading 8473 30 90 of the CN?

---

(1)  OJ L 64, p. 21.

1

(2)  The products consist of two elements: a ‘heat sink’ (heat exchanger) and a fan, which are durably attached to each other to form a whole.

2

---
#### In the Matter of the Habeas Corpus of *Connie Gene*GRAY, *Petitioner.*

*No.*A-12505.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 26, 1957.

John F. Booth, Jr., Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

William Mounger, Asst. County Atty., Oklahoma County, Oklahoma City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Connie Gene Gray, was charged by complaint in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, with the crime of unlawful possession of narcotics, second and subsequent offense, and another offense with which we are not herein concerned. Bail was therein set in the amount of $10,000. At a hearing on application for writ of habeas corpus, before the Honorable Gleni O. Morris, Judge of the District Court,, the aforesaid bail was reduced to the sum. of $7,000.

Whereupon, application by petitioner for habeas corpus was made in this Court; the-petition alleging that setting of the bond, in the sum of $7,000 was excessive and equivalent to denying bail.

This Court, upon hearing the evidence-offered and after a full consideration of all the facts in the case, was of the opinion-that the amount of bail fixed by the District Court in said cause was excessive and should be reduced.

By reason of the foregoing facts, this-Court, on the 21st day of June, 1957,. granted the writ and ordered the defendant released from the County Jail of Oklahoma County upon giving bail in the sum of $5,000, to be approved by the Justice Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.

In keeping with this order, the writ is-hereby granted, in compliance with the order as above stated.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4346 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4346

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification 
 regarding the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance 
 may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2017

    Mr. Foster (for himself, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, and Mr. Takano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification 
 regarding the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance 
 may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GI Education Benefits Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER THE POST-
              9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 3319(c) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Eligible Dependents.--
            ``(1) Transfer.--An individual approved to transfer an 
        entitlement to educational assistance under this section may 
        transfer the individual's entitlement as follows:
                    ``(A) To the individual's spouse.
                    ``(B) To one or more of the individual's children.
                    ``(C) To a combination of the individuals referred 
                to in subparagraphs (A) and (B).
            ``(2) Definition of children.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `children' includes dependents described 
        in section 1072(2)(I) of title 10.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to educational assistance payable under chapter 33 
of title 38, United States Code, before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4346 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding 

the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance may be transferred under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, and Mr. TAKANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding the children to whom entitlement to 

educational assistance may be transferred under the 

Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Education Benefits 

5 Fairness Act’’. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4346 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO 

2 WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO EDUCATIONAL AS3 SISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER 

4 THE POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3319(c) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(c) ELIGIBLE DEPENDENTS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) TRANSFER.—An individual approved to 

10 transfer an entitlement to educational assistance 

11 under this section may transfer the individual’s enti12 tlement as follows: 

13 ‘‘(A) To the individual’s spouse. 

14 ‘‘(B) To one or more of the individual’s 

15 children. 

16 ‘‘(C) To a combination of the individuals 

17 referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B). 

18 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION OF CHILDREN.—For purposes 

19 of this subsection, the term ‘children’ includes de20 pendents described in section 1072(2)(I) of title 

21 10.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to educational assist24 ance payable under chapter 33 of title 38, United States 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4346 IH

1 Code, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                            BIA Publications, Inc.
                        14595 Avion Parkway, Suite 500
                           Chantilly, Virginia 22021



                                                              March 20, 1997



SFX Broadcasting, Inc.
150 East 58th Street, 19th Floor
New York, New York  10155

Gentlemen:

                  BIA Publications, Inc. hereby consents to the use of the
radio station and market data which has been or will be provided to you in
connection with certain periodic reports which will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                            Very truly yours,

                                            BIA PUBLICATIONS, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Debra L. Metcalf
                                                   ____________________________
                                                   Authorized Officer
# C_2008128EN.01002202.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 7 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 4 March 2008 — Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI) and Asociación de Artistas Intérpretes o Ejecutantes — Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE) v Sogecable S.A. and Canal Satélite Digital S.L.

o

(Case C-98/08)

(2008/C 128/39)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 7 de Madrid

o

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI) and Asociación de Artistas Intérpretes o Ejecutantes — Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE)

Applicants:

Defendants: Sogecable S.A. and Canal Satélite Digital S.L.

Defendants:

Question referred

Does Community law and, in particular, Council Directive 92/100/EEC (1) of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property permit the Member States to adopt a provision like Article 109.1 of Law 22/1987 of 11 November on Intellectual Property, which recognises the exclusive right of producers of phonograms published for commercial purposes to authorise the public communication of those phonograms and copies thereof?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 346, p. 61.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Warren Ivey, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Zittell, J.), rendered March 9, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Having reviewed the record in this case, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. The judgment must therefore be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Creeden,*150 AD2d 887).

Casey, J. P., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1378-E1379]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       TRIBUTE TO RONALD F. DASH

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JON RUNYAN

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. RUNYAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to one of my 
constituents, Ronald F. Dash, a resident of the Township of 
Willingboro, Burlington County, New Jersey in recognition of his 
outstanding service on behalf of veterans throughout the State of New 
Jersey. Ronald F. Dash has served as Chairman of the Willingboro 
Veterans Advisory Committee and as the Advisor to Willingboro's Mayor 
and Council on Veterans Issues. He also serves on my Military Academy 
Advisory Committee which makes recommendations for young men and women 
from New Jersey's Third District who are applying to attend one of our 
nation's service academies.
  Ronald F. Dash served his country with honor and valor as a member of 
the United States Marine Corps during the Vietnam War, where he was 
wounded and received the Purple Heart. After his Marine Corps (USMC) 
service in Vietnam, he served in the Army Reserves and then 
transitioned to the Army National Guard attaining a final military rank 
of Staff Sergeant (E6).
  He has given generously of his time, energies, and resources as a 
Commander and State Chaplain in the Military Order of the Purple Heart 
Chapter 26, and as a member of the

[[Page E1379]]

Veterans of Foreign Wars (V.F.W.) Post 4914, the American Legion Post 
516, the Disabled American Veterans Chapter 42, and the Marine Corps 
League 695. Ron Dash continues to visit and assist veterans, provide 
food for the homeless, and provide transportation for people with 
special needs across Willingboro and other communities.
  I thank Ronald F. Dash for his patriotism, and his continued service 
to the Willingboro community, the State of New Jersey, and this great 
nation. I urge my colleagues to join me in recognizing this great 
veteran hero and community servant.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4917]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        JOB CREATORS IN AMERICA

  (Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina asked and was given permission to 
address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina. Madam Speaker, you know, last week the 
President said to American job creators that if you've got a business, 
you didn't build that; somebody else made that happen.
  Well, let me tell you, Mr. President, that prior to coming to 
Congress I ran my own business for 16 years. Where was the President or 
this phantom person that he claims that created my business? Where were 
they when I was driving 60,000 miles a year chasing business or putting 
in 16-hour days or signing the loan paperwork at the bank so that I 
could make payroll or keep the wheels turning on my vehicles? The only 
other person that was there when I started my business was my wife, 
Melody, who supported me in so many ways.
  This asinine comment by the President of the United States clearly 
shows that neither he nor anyone in the administration know anything 
about creating jobs or running a business here in America.
  May God bless the real job creators in America, and may God continue 
to bless this great Nation.

                Announcement by the Speaker Pro Tempore

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to address their 
remarks to the Chair.

                          ____________________
```
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2009 – Commission v Portugal**

**(Case C‐253/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2006/22/EC – Approximation of laws – Social legislation relating to road transport activities –Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 35). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2006/22; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4914]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1030
                     INTERNATIONAL AIDS CONFERENCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from New 
York (Mr. Rangel) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. RANGEL. This Sunday, the International AIDS Conference is going 
to be held in our Nation's Capital. It was some 30 years ago that this 
serious disease became known in our great country and spread from other 
parts of the world. Since that time, we've lost over a half a million 
people, yet we have not found a cure for this deadly disease.
  I have introduced legislation, H.R. 1462, with Senator Gillibrand, to 
see whether or not we can have more national attention focused on the 
fact that we can do a lot more than we are doing.
  The major thrust, of course, of what we have to do is to educate 
people that, although it used to have great stigma, there are so many 
different ways to come in contact with the disease. Education is one 
way that we can help people. Prevention, of course, is another, but I 
would like to emphasize the need for testing. So many people are 
walking around with the virus and have no idea that they have it. Even 
though there have been efforts made by community organizations for free 
testing, this is one of the exciting things about the President's 
Affordable Care Act.
  There is no question that after we get finished with the political 
circus that we are forced to go through because of the coming election 
that more and more Americans will understand the benefits they are 
receiving even now from this universal coverage, which so many people 
need, and the dramatic decrease in cost when people are able to get 
preventative care. Preventative care is one of the major parts of the 
President's Affordable Care Act. What it means is that people can now 
go to doctors for regular checkups and can find out things in time to 
prevent them from becoming more serious.
  My mom had three kids. When I was a kid, someone told her that she 
was going to the doctor with us, and we were not sick. Well, that was 
something that we didn't think was a luxury we could afford. Now, in 
seeing how important it is to contain serious illnesses and to reduce 
the costs of health care, it is so important that preventative care be 
a part of our national health system, and the quicker we get on with 
the implementation of this great bill, the more lives and the more 
dollars we will be able to save.
  So, remember, if you have any interest at all, take a look at what is 
going to be happening in September. The Congressional Black Caucus, 
during our legislative weekend that month, will have professionals come 
in to talk with us, to teach us, to tell us what we can do to extend 
this education process throughout our great country.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,464-01

EX PARTE MIGUEL ANGEL MONTES GONZALEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2020-DCR-00828-G IN THE 404 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant’s application is written in Spanish. In order for this Court to properly address

Applicant’s claims, the trial court should have Applicant’s memorandum translated by a certified

translator. 

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has obtained a translated and

certified copy of Applicant’s application. The translation shall be resolved within 90 days of this
2

order. A supplemental transcript containing the original application and the certified, translated

application shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions

of time shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 25, 2023

Do not publish
22283

#### State v. Wang

Affirmed