alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Joseph N. Giamboi et al., Petitioners, against James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

August 26, 1959.

*494
      *Morris Schwalb*and *Robert C. Rosenberg*for petitioners.

*Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Jack Mund*of counsel), for respondents.

Thomas C. Chimera, J.

The reasons that impel the substitution of voting machines for paper ballots in primary contests in the Boroughs of Manhattan and Queens in the City of New York are certainly no more compelling than those obtaining in contests in other boroughs. The peculiarities sought to be guarded against are common to all primary election contests. The matter, however, still remains in the sound discretion of the Board of Elections.

The provisions of section 242-a of the Election Law, among other things, leave to the Board of Elections of the City of New York the choice whether voting machines shall be used where primary election contests are indicated and it is settled that the board may not be compelled to furnish them if it elects not to do so. *(Matter of Klein*v. *Power,*7 Misc 2d 794, affd. 4 A D 2d 834, affd. 3 N Y 2d 890; *Matter of Kaufman*v. *Board of Elections,*14 Misc 2d 197.)

Petitioners in their argument suggest that the discretion of the board is limited to whether the machines shall or shall not be used in contested primary elections and is not broad enough to permit the board to use machines in some political subdivisions and not in others where contests are indicated.

The intention of the Legislature is found in the express language of section 242-a *(supra)*which reads in part as follows: *“*§ 242-a. Use of voting machines at primaries. 1. The board of elections * * * may adopt the use of voting machines for any primary election or elections in *any or all*parts of such city or county ” (emphasis ours).

This court takes judicial notice of the experimental nature of the declared intention of the Board of Elections, the time element, the budgetary problems and the mechanical and manpower equations that must be considered by it before a general transition from paper ballots to machines throughout the City of New York can be successfully accomplished.

If the discretion exercised by the board must be overturned such a decision must be based on something more than a showing that the desired relief is salutary. The argument that the installation of voting machines here presents no extra burden, financial or otherwise, is unrealistic and therefore unacceptable.

*495In the absence of a showing of arbitrary or capricious acts this court may not substitute its judgment for the discretion of the Board of Elections, and, accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
# C_2009141EN.01003504.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/35

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-326/08) (1)

1

2009/C 141/69

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
Item 7.1.1_Glossary B (slaughter + euthanasia + stunning + death + distress + pain + suffering)/ page 1	

Annex 4B

**GLOSSARY**

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*:

***~~DEATH~~***

~~means the irreversible permanent loss of all vital functions brain activity demonstrable by the loss of brain stem reflexes. This may be confirmed through a combination of criteria such as dilated pupil and absence of corneal reflex, cardiac activity and breathing.~~

***DISTRESS***

means the state of an animal~~,~~ that has been unable to adapt to stressors~~,~~, that ~~and~~~~that~~ manifests ~~as~~as abnormal physiological or behavioural responses or no signs. It can be acute or chronic and may result in pathological conditions.

***EUTHANASIA***

means *killing*of an*animal***~~the act of inducing *death*~~~~using a method that causes a rapid and irreversible loss of consciousness~~ with the most rapid~~,~~ method and with the least *pain*~~less~~ and *~~distress free~~ suffering*~~method~~ possible~~minimum painand distress to *animal*~~. 

***PAIN***

means an acutely or chronically unpleasant or aversive sensory and emotional ~~experience~~state of an animal associated with actual or potential tissue damage.~~It may elicit protective actions, result in learned avoidance and distress and may modify species-specific traits of behaviour, including social behaviour.~~

***SLAUGHTER***

means ~~any~~*killing*~~procedure that causes the *death* of an *animal* by bleeding~~ of an*animal~~s~~*primarily intended for human consumption.

***STUNNING***

means any ~~mechanical, electrical, chemical or other~~procedure that causes ~~rapid~~~~immediate~~ loss of consciousness with minimal pain ~~and other types of~~ and *suffering*for the purpose of killing; ~~when used before *slaughter*, the loss of consciousness lasts until *death* from the *slaughter* process~~.~~;~~~~in the absence of *slaughter*, the procedure would allow the *animal* to recover consciousness.~~

***SUFFERING***

means an acutely or chronically unpleasant or aversive, ~~undesired~~physical or ~~mental~~~~~~emotional state of ~~being that is the outcome of the impact on~~ an animal, including *pain* and resulting from~~of noxious~~negative stimuli ~~and/~~or~~the~~ absence of ~~importan~~t ~~essentia~~l positive stimuli.~~It is the opposite of good welfare.~~

____________________________

*OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2021*

*OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2022*1
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8921-8922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03496]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9041]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Sultans of Deccan India, 1500-1700: Opulence and 
Fantasy''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Sultans of Deccan India, 1500-1700: 
Opulence and Fantasy,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or

[[Page 8922]]

custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, 
from on or about April 20, 2015, until on or about July 26, 2015, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-03496 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE 19-11

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron Rippke

Director

SUBJECT: Expanded NCAH Portal Functionality: APHIS Form 2005 

Applications for Research and Evaluation, and Transit Shipment 

Permits

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Notice is to inform applicants that the Center for Veterinary 

Biologics (CVB) is expanding the functionality of the web-based NCAH Portal by 

accepting submission of APHIS Form 2005 applications marked for Research and 

Evaluation or Transit Shipment. Submitters must have eAuthentication credentials to 

submit electronic APHIS Form 2005 applications.

II. BACKGROUND

The NCAH Portal is external-facing and enables web-based electronic submissions and 

responses between permit applicants and CVB. This expands NCAH Portal submissions 

to the Policy, Evaluation and Licensing (PEL).

III. ACTION

Beginning in September 2019, all permit applicants will be able to submit APHIS Form 

2005 applications through the NCAH Portal. Before submitting an APHIS Form 2005 

application, read the following instructions on the NCAH Portal Guidance page of the 

CVB website.

• User Guide 27—APHIS Form 2005 - Application for United States Veterinary 

Biological Product Permit: Research and Evaluation

• User Guide 28 – APHIS Form 2005 – Application for United States Veterinary 

Biological Product Permit: Transit Shipment Only

Direct any additional questions to CVB.PIMS@usda.gov.

IV. IMPLEMENTATION

Implementation of the NCAH Portal for APHIS Form 2005 submissions is scheduled to 

begin September 26, 2019.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
EXHIBIT 10.16

                            FIRST AMENDMENT
                                TO THE
            GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES
                      DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


WHEREAS, Giant Industries, Inc. (the "Employer") maintains the Giant
Industries, Inc. and Affiliated Companies Deferred Compensation Plan
(the "Plan") effective October 31, 2005; and

WHEREAS the Employer desires to amend the plan to permit a one-time
change in distribution elections under transition rules under
applicable regulations; and

WHEREAS the Board of Directors has authorized the Administrative
Committee to amend the Plan, to facilitate the Plan's administration of
its design if the modifications do not significantly increase the cost
of the Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended by adding Section 6.13 as follows:

"6.13 TRANSITION ELECTION

     A Participant may make an election to change the distribution date
     with respect to amounts deferred for 2005 under Section 6.4; the
     distribution form with respect to distributions under Section 6.1;
     and the distribution date under Section 6.7, as long as (1) the
     election is made by December 31, 2006, (2) the election change is
     not made with respect to payments that would otherwise be made in
     2006, and (3) the election change does not cause payments to be
     made in 2006."

Adopted as of  November 13, 2006.

Administrative Committee of the Giant Industries, Inc.
and Affiliated Companies Deferred Compensation Plan


By: /s/ NATALIE R. DOPP
   ------------------------
Committee Member
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 56 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 033-27783) and Amendment No. 442 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.









/s/ Ernst &  Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania




December 27, 2016
#### Morris Horn, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Howard M. Horn, an Infant, Plaintiff, *v.*Gordon McCarrell, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

December 4, 1958.

*Felig & Felig*for plaintiff.

*Casper B. Ughetta*for defendant.

Jacob J. Schwartzwald, J.

Motion for an order directing the attorney for the defendant to deliver to the attorneys for the plaintiffs a copy of Dr. Leon Singerman’s report pertaining to a physical examination of the infant plaintiff held on December 27, 1957, is in all respects granted. *(Gooch*v. *Blanch,*14 Misc 2d 396.) This court is of the opinion that in view of all the enlightened procedures the rules and the law should provide that under any circumstances the plaintiff should be entitled *to*a copy of the report of the defendant’s doctor.

Submit order.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5618]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      LA PINE LAND CONVEYANCE ACT

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The unfinished business is the question on 
suspending the rules and passing the bill (S. 270) to direct the 
Secretary of the Interior to convey certain Federal land to Deschutes 
County, Oregon.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn) that the House suspend the rules 
and pass the bill.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            4955
<SECURITIES>                                      7888
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3634
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1492
<INVENTORY>                                       1227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19223
<PP&E>                                            1234
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           227
<OTHER-SE>                                       12243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21651
<SALES>                                          13973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13973
<CGS>                                             4099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    19331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (30)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John R. Coghlan, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Temporary
Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       October 31, 2005

/s/ John R. Coghlan
------------------------------------
John R. Coghlan
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                 10-QSB Page 17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Transition to Aging Research Award for Predoctoral Students.                    

*Date:*                         February 8, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mariel Jais, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue Gateway Bldg., Suite 2E400, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2614,                         *mariel.jais@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28070 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4915]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 RECESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the 
Chair declares the House in recess until noon today.
  Accordingly (at 10 o'clock and 43 minutes a.m.), the House stood in 
recess.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1335]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         RED TAPE REDUCTION AND SMALL BUSINESS JOB CREATION ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                          HON. RUBEN HINOJOSA

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

       The House in Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
     the Union had under consideration the bill (H.R. 4078) to 
     provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory 
     action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 
     6.0 percent:

  Mr. HINOJOSA. Mr. Chair, I rise today in support of the Amendment 
offered by my esteemed colleague from Florida, Mr. Posey (#25). His 
Amendment would ensure that the rule recently approved by the Internal 
Revenue Service requiring that interest payments on foreign deposits be 
reported to the IRS would not move forward. This is extremely important 
to the region which I represent, deep South Texas. Our community banks 
and local economies benefit from investments and deposits from non-
residents, and would be harmed by the serious loss of capital caused by 
these depositors fleeing our communities. Many of these depositors have 
chosen to bank in the United States because of the stability of our 
financial institution system. If this ruling goes into effect, and 
these deposits evaporate, the capacity of these banks to invest in the 
local economies diminishes.
  A Mercatus Center 2004 study of a similar rule projected that $88 
billion of capital would exit United States banks if the rule were to 
take effect. At a time of extreme economic fragility, we need this 
capital to stay on our shores. Additionally, many foreign depositors 
have chosen to bank in the United States for security reasons; their 
home countries may be politically unstable, and they fear that personal 
financial information released by the United States may fall into the 
wrong hands, making them a target.
  Lastly, the Internal Revenue Service has exceeded its authority. 
Foreigners do not pay taxes on interest earned on deposits, so there is 
no reason for these deposits to be reported to the IRS. Congress 
intended to attract capital to the United States by allowing these 
deposits to go interest-free; to force these depositors to report will 
run contrary to this original intent.
  I urge all my colleagues to support this Amendment that will prevent 
much-needed capital from fleeing the American economy.

                          ____________________
```