alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Haynes, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), rendered June 29, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove his identity as the perpetrator of the instant robbery beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, however, we find that the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620) was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Indeed, the testimony of the complainant convincingly established that the defendant, acting in concert with another, displayed a handgun and a knife during a robbery during which the complainant was able to observe the defendant for approximately six minutes under good lighting conditions and at close range. The complainant’s unhesitating identification testimony was in and of itself sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction *(see, People v Howard,*153 AD2d 903; *People v Solomon,*141 AD2d 579, *People v Blackshear,*112 AD2d 1044). Moreover, the minor testimonial inconsistencies of which the defendant now complains do not render the complainant’s testimony incredible as a matter of law *(see, People v Colon,*161 AD2d 782; *People v Punter,*149 AD2d 631). The jury heard and saw the complainant testify and thus it was *930entitled to favorably credit his testimony *(see, People v Atilio,*155 AD2d 604; *People v Hawkins,*155 AD2d 617). It was similarly free to discredit the defendant’s alibi defense. The jury’s determination is clearly supported by the record *(see, People v Kelly,*155 AD2d 692; *People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
# C_2010063EN.01001302.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 January 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Arnhem — Netherlands) — K. van Dijk v Gemeente Kampen

(Case C-470/08) (1)

1

(Common agricultural policy - Integrated administration and control system for certain aid schemes - Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 - Single payment scheme - Transfer of payment entitlements - Expiry of the lease - Obligations of the lessee and the lessor)

2010/C 63/20

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Arnhem

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K. van Dijk

Applicant:

Defendant: Gemeente Kampen

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te Arnhem — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1) and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 of 21 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (OJ 2004 L 141, p. 1) — Integrated system for the management and supervision of certain aid schemes — Single payment scheme — Transfer of payment entitlements — Obligations on the lessor and lessee.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Community law does not require a lessee, on the expiry of the lease, to deliver to the lessor the leased land, including the payment entitlements accumulated thereon or relating thereto, or to pay him compensation.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

 

Board of Directors

ProCyte Corporation

Redmond, Washington

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 333-46506, 333-64339, 33-59983, 33-48809, and33-40565 on Form S-8 of ProCyte Corporation of our report dated February 21,2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for the year ended December 31,2002, as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements),appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ProCyte Corporation for the yearended December 31, 2002.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 28, 2003

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, January 23, 2024, 12 p.m. to January 23, 2024, 04 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 25, 2023, 88FR69211.                

There is a time change for the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering meeting on January 23, 2024. The Open Session of the Council meeting will begin at 11:00 a.m. and conclude at 2:00 p.m. on January 23, 2024. The meeting is partially Closed to the public.

Dated: December 18, 2023.

Victoria E. Townsend,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28123 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: March 8, 2011
/s/ TODD E. WILLETodd E. WilleChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1383]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             NO CO-PAY DAY

                                 ______
                                 

                     HON. DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commemorate No 
Co-Pay Day.
  Today marks a victory for women's health care. Some 47 million women 
will now be able to get preventative services that couldn't before this 
rule went into effect.
  Any new insurance policies sold to individuals or employers must 
cover contraception without a co-pay as part of a larger package of 
mandatory co-pay-free women's preventive care benefits. Insurance plans 
that have already been purchased will have to start offering no-co-pay 
contraception when they renew.
  Before the Affordable Care Act, some insurance companies did not 
cover preventative services for women under their health care plans, 
and others required deductibles or co-pays for the care they needed.
  That changes today--all health insurance policies are required to 
cover new preventative care without charging women any co-pays or 
deductibles. Some of the new preventative services now available with 
no co-pay include annual visits, FDA-approved contraceptives, domestic 
violence screenings and counseling, breastfeeding support, HPV DNA 
testing for women 30 or older, HIV and sexually transmitted infections 
screenings, and gestational diabetes screenings that help protect 
pregnant women from one of the most serious pregnancy-related diseases.
  Too often, women put their families' health care before their own, 
especially when it comes to preventative care.
  Thanks to this new benefit in the Affordable Care Act, women can get 
the regular checkups and screenings that are so important to staying 
healthy without having to worry about how much it will affect the 
family budget.
  Today's announcement is just one more part of the overall 
implementation plan for improving our nation's health care system.
  The Affordable Care Act will provide greater access to affordable 
health care for millions of women and families who do not have coverage 
now, while also lowering health care costs, creating jobs, 
strengthening the middle class, and reducing the deficit.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008171EN.01001202.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof lodged on 2 April 2008 — J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j. v Hauptzollamt Bremen

(Case C-134/08)

(2008/C 171/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j.

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bremen

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2193/2003 of 8 December 2003 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America (1) to be interpreted, contrary to its wording, as meaning that products for which it can be demonstrated that they are on their way to the Community on the date of first application of the additional duties and whose destination cannot be changed are not affected by the additional duty?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 328, p. 3.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4370 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4370

 To amend the Natural Gas Act to expedite approval of exports of small 
            volumes of natural gas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2017

 Mr. Yoho (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida, Mr. 
    Perry, and Mr. Pearce) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Natural Gas Act to expedite approval of exports of small 
            volumes of natural gas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Scale LNG Access Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF EXPORT OF CERTAIN VOLUMES OF NATURAL GAS.

    Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b(c)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(c) For purposes of'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Expedited Application and Approval Process.--
            ``(1) Free trade agreements in effect.--For purposes of''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Small-scale natural gas exports.--For purposes of 
        subsection (a), any application for the exportation of natural 
        gas in a volume that is equal to or less than 51,100,000,000 
        cubic feet per year of natural gas shall be--
                    ``(A) deemed to be consistent with the public 
                interest; and
                    ``(B) granted without modification or delay.
            ``(3) Exclusions.--Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply 
        to any nation subject to sanctions imposed by the United 
        States.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008301EN.01001502.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 22 August 2008 — Car Trim GmbH v KeySafety Systems SRL

(Case C-381/08)

(2008/C 301/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Car Trim GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: KeySafety Systems SRL

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that contracts for the delivery of goods to be produced or manufactured are, notwithstanding specific obligations on the part of the customer with regard to the provision, fabrication and delivery of the components to be produced, including a guarantee of the quality of production, reliability of delivery and smooth administrative handling of the order, to be classified as a sale of goods (first indent), and not as provision of services (second indent)? What criteria are decisive for the distinction? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that contracts for the delivery of goods to be produced or manufactured are, notwithstanding specific obligations on the part of the customer with regard to the provision, fabrication and delivery of the components to be produced, including a guarantee of the quality of production, reliability of delivery and smooth administrative handling of the order, to be classified as a sale of goods (first indent), and not as provision of services (second indent)? What criteria are decisive for the distinction?

1

| 2. | If a sale of goods is to be presumed: in the case of contracts involving carriage of goods, is the place where under the contract the goods sold were delivered or should have been delivered to be determined according to the place of physical transfer to the purchaser, or according to the place at which the goods were handed over to the first carrier for transmission to the purchaser? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If a sale of goods is to be presumed: in the case of contracts involving carriage of goods, is the place where under the contract the goods sold were delivered or should have been delivered to be determined according to the place of physical transfer to the purchaser, or according to the place at which the goods were handed over to the first carrier for transmission to the purchaser?

---

(1)  OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27824]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-64-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 94, Notification of Proposed Production 
Activity; PREH INC.; (Automotive Display Assemblies); Laredo, Texas

    The City of Laredo, grantee of FTZ 94, submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) on behalf of 
PREH INC., located in Laredo, Texas within FTZ 94. The notification 
conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 
400.22) was received on December 6, 2023.
    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be 
limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/component(s) and 
specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification 
(summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The 
benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ 
procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's 
website--accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    The proposed finished product is automotive display assemblies 
(duty rate is duty-free).
    The proposed foreign-status materials and components include 
automotive display sub-assemblies, stainless steel screws, and 
polyethylene foil labels (duty rate ranges from duty-free to 8.5%). The 
request indicates that certain materials/components are subject to 
duties under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (section 301), 
depending on the country of origin. The applicable section 301 
decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in 
privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3958789b38781929796dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="234557596357514247460d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is January 29, 
2024.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information System'' section of the Board's 
website.
    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91fbe4f0fff8e5f0bff2f9f4ffd1e5e3f0f5f4bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3b9a6b2bdbaa7b2fdb0bbb6bd93a7a1b2b7b6fdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 13, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27824 Filed 12-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 99(a)

Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Potash
Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2002 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                                                  |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: March 26, 2003 |  | /s/ WILLIAM J. DOYLE                                            
|                      |  |                                                                 
|                      |  | William J. Doyle                                                
|                      |  | President and Chief
    Executive Officer                       
|                     
|                     
|Dated: March 26, 2003 |  | /s/ WAYNE R. BROWNLEE                                           
|                      |  |                                                                 
|                      |  | Wayne R. Brownlee                                               
|                      |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
    Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.