NAIMA / U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Knauf Insulation GmbH 

Lanett Plant 

3502 43rd Street 

Lanett, Alabama 36863 

Project No. 10-3990.11 

January 18, 2011 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 621 glass melt 

furnace located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH Plant in Lanett, Alabama: 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol 

emission rates from two exhaust stacks associated with the Line 621 forming and collection 

process and the Line 621 curing oven and cooling process (one stack for each process). 

Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of 

BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. 

EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Tables I and II on the following 

pages summarize the overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

ii

Table I 

Line 621 Glass Melt Furnace Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable 

Particulate 8.9E-02 2.7E+00 

Antimony < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 

Arsenic < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 

Beryllium < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 

Cadmium 1.6E-05 4.9E-04 

Chromium 5.6E-04 1.7E-02 

Cobalt < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 

Lead 1.6E-04 5.0E-03 

Manganese < 3.5E-05 1.1E-03 

Nickel < 3.4E-05 1.0E-03 

621 

Furnace 

October 20 

& 21, 2010 

Selenium < 5.7E-05 1.7E-03 

621 

Furnace 

October 19, 

2010 Mercury 1.2E-04 3.1E-03 

621 

Furnace 

October 20 

& 21, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium 1.4E-04 4.5E-03 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 621 2.1E-02 6.2E-01 

Furnace 19-Oct-10 

Hydrogen Fluoride 5.9E-02 1.8E+00 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

iii

Table II 

Line 621 Forming and Curing Oven Stacks 

EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

(Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions) 

Source Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 8.2E-02 8.9E-02 

Methanol 1.9E-02 2.1E-02 

621 

Forming 

Stack 

October 20, 

2010 

Phenol < 7.0E-03 7.6E-03 

Formaldehyde 7.6E-01 7.9E+00 

Methanol 2.9E-02 3.0E-01 

621 

Curing 

Oven 

Stack 

October 19, 

2010 

Phenol < 7.2E-03 7.5E-02 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 3

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 3 

3.2 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 4 

3.3 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.4 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 4 

3.5 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 5 

3.6 HCOH, PHENOL, AND MEOH CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES ........................... 5 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 6

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Line 621 Glass Melt Furnace Test Program Results Summary 

Table 3 – Line 621 Forming and Curing Oven Stacks EPA Method 316 Emissions 

Test Program Results Summary (Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol 

Emissions) 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Glass Melt Furnace 

Figure 2– Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Forming and Collection 

Figure 3– Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Curing Oven and Cooling 

Figure 4– Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 - Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 8 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 9 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Production Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 621 glass melt 

furnace located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH Plant in Lanett, Alabama: 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol 

emission rates from two exhaust stacks associated with the Line 621 forming and collection 

process and the Line 621 curing oven and cooling process (one stack for each process). 

Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of 

BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. 

EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was 

conducted on October 19, 20 and 21, 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests 

at each location for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program 

included the personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Daniel Moore METCO Environmental 

Will Starkey METCO Environmental 

Mike Luckett METCO Environmental 

Jeremiah Johnson METCO Environmental 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

2

2.0 Process Description

The processes evaluated by this emissions test program include the Line 621 melt furnace, the 

Line 621 forming and collection process, and the Line 621 curing oven/cooling process. The 

glass melt furnace fires natural gas and the furnace feed includes mixed batch and cullet. 

Emissions from the glass melt furnace are controlled by a dry electrostatic precipitator (ESP). 

Emissions from the forming and collection process are controlled by a wet ESP and emissions 

from the oven and cooling process are controlled by thermal oxidizers. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, Line 621 was operated under normal conditions. Process 

production data is available in Appendix B. Other process and control equipment data will be 

available to U.S. EPA on request. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

3

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into six 

categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates; and, 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and 

emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.6, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in 

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 1-3 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube 

with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used 

to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

4

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 4. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

determined gravimetrically. 

3.2 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system 

consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated 

quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a 

Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to 

each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO3)/10% 

hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals sampling train 

is provided as Figure 5. 

3.3 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon tubing, (4) 

three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty as a water 

knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica gel 

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 6. 

3.4 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe 

liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length of sample 

line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two 

were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling 

train is provided as Figure 7. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

5

3.5 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 8 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 

3.6 HCOH, Phenol, and MeOH Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and emission rates were conducted 

using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 316 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM98.01. HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and emission rates were be measured using 

Metco’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted 

of (1) a steel nozzle, (2) a heated probe with a glass probe liner, (3) four GS impingers, (4) a 

length of sample line, and (5) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first three impingers were filled with high purity water,

and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic 

drawing of the Method 316 sampling train is provided as Figure 9. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

6

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Tables 2 and 3. 

Table 2 

Line 621 Glass Melt Furnace Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable 

Particulate 8.9E-02 2.7E+00 

Antimony < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 

Arsenic < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 

Beryllium < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 

Cadmium 1.6E-05 4.9E-04 

Chromium 5.6E-04 1.7E-02 

Cobalt < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 

Lead 1.6E-04 5.0E-03 

Manganese < 3.5E-05 1.1E-03 

Nickel < 3.4E-05 1.0E-03 

621 

Furnace 

October 20 

& 21, 2010 

Selenium < 5.7E-05 1.7E-03 

621 

Furnace 

October 19, 

2010 Mercury 1.2E-04 3.1E-03 

621 

Furnace 

October 20 

& 21, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium 1.4E-04 4.5E-03 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 621 2.1E-02 6.2E-01 

Furnace 19-Oct-10 

Hydrogen Fluoride 5.9E-02 1.8E+00 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the 

method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or 

more of the sample fractions. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

7

Table 3 

Line 621 Forming and Curing Oven Stacks 

EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

(Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions) 

Source Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 8.2E-02 8.9E-02 

Methanol 1.9E-02 2.1E-02 

621 

Forming 

Stack 

October 20, 

2010 

Phenol < 7.0E-03 7.6E-03 

Formaldehyde 7.6E-01 7.9E+00 

Methanol 2.9E-02 3.0E-01 

621 

Curing 

Oven 

Stack 

October 19, 

2010 

Phenol < 7.2E-03 7.5E-02 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process 

production data is included in Appendix B. Field and computer-generated data sheets are 

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes 

laboratory analytical reports. 
Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

8

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Knauf Insulation GmbH. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s 

consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES 
Diameter:

47.50 in

Points Distance "

12 1.0

11 3.2

10 5.6

9 8.4

8 11.9

7 16.9

6 30.6

5 35.6

4 39.1

3 41.9

2 44.3

1 46.5

Site:

Knauf Insulation

Lanett, Alabama Site

Glass Melt Furnace Stack

621 Line

Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Diameter:

174 in

Points Distance "

12 3.7

11 11.7

10 20.6

9 30.8

8 43.6

7 62.0

6 112.2

5 130.7

4 143.4

3 153.7

2 162.6

1 170.6

Note: Four test ports may be used.

Site:

Knauf Insulation

Lanett, Alabama Site

621 Line - Forming and Collection Stack

Figure 2

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Diameter:

73.6 in

Points Distance "

12 1.5

11 4.9

10 8.7

9 13.0

8 18.4

7 26.2

6 47.4

5 55.2

4 60.5

3 64.9

2 68.6

1 72.0

Site:

Knauf Insulation

Lanett, Alabama Site

621 Line - Curing Oven Stack

Figure 3

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 4

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Knauf Insulation

Lanett, Alabama

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 29Knauf InsulationLanett, Alabama

BT Environmen

2615 W

Ferndale, M

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationLanett, Alabama

BT Environm

261

Ferndale

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 0061Knauf InsulationLanett, Alabama

BT Environm

26

Fern

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 8

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationLanett, Alabama

BT Environm

26

Fern

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N 
Figure 9

Site:USEPA Method 316Knauf InsulationLanett, Alabama

BT Environmen

2615 W

Ferndale M

100 ml Ultrafiltered H Silica gel 2O

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
APPENDIX A 

Detailed Test Run Results 
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/21/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:32:00 13:20:00 8:20:00

Run Finish Time 12:47:00 16:31:00 11:30:00

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.432 0.432 0.432 0.432

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.802 0.802 0.802 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.14 29.12 29.15

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.39 1.49 1.45 1.44

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 130.320 135.620 131.143 132.361

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 87.97 89.25 81.99 86.40

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 124.246 128.853 126.170 126.423

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 406.9 403.2 418 409.4

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 19.15 18.98 19.68 19.27

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 13.4 12.8 13.5 13.2

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.866 0.872 0.865 0.868

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 8.42 8.35 8.99 8.6

%O2 Oxygen, % 18.6 18.8 18.54 18.6

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 73 72.85 72.47 72.8

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.09 30.09 30.18 30.12

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.48 28.54 28.54 28.52

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.4 -0.40 -0.40 -0.40

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.15 29.11 29.09 29.12

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 519 517 507 514

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.117 0.130 0.124 0.124

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 25.3 26.7 26.1 26.0

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 9,058 8,520 8,846 8,808

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 19,760 18,714 19,268 19,248

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.1 95.7 96.2 96.7

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 10.7 13.0 5.4 9.7

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 3.0 3.6 1.5 2.7

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.10 0.12 0.05 0.09

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E-04 5.5E-04 5.6E-04 5.6E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 1.8E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E-04 5.5E-04 5.6E-04 5.6E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 1.8E-05

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 2.00 1.97 1.26 1.74

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E-04 5.4E-04 3.5E-04 4.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.8E-05 1.2E-05 1.6E-05

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 54.2 85.6 43.0 60.9

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-02 2.3E-02 1.2E-02 1.7E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-04 8.0E-04 4.0E-04 5.6E-04

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 17.7 23.6 12.4 17.9

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 5.0E-03 6.5E-03 3.5E-03 5.0E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-04 2.2E-04 1.1E-04 1.6E-04

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-03 1.0E-03 1.1E-03 1.1E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.4E-05 3.5E-05 3.5E-05 3.5E-05

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 4.7 3.8 2.5 3.7

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-03 1.0E-03 7.0E-04 1.0E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.3E-05 3.5E-05 2.3E-05 3.4E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 7.4 5.0 6.3 6.2

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-03 1.4E-03 1.8E-03 1.7E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.7E-05 4.6E-05 5.8E-05 5.7E-05

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf Insulation 10-3990.11

Lanett AL

Source 621 Furnace

Personnel Starkey
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDKnauf Insulation Lanett Alabama 621 Furnace Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data F

BDL

1 10/19/2010 9:52 10/19/2010 11:52 2.57E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2 10/19/2010 12:15 10/19/2010 14:15 2.33E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 10/19/2010 14:35 10/19/2010 16:35 4.51E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Em

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

 QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volum

Differenc

13.9 9.5 19.2 19,340 8,675 502

Stack gas info from 26A run 1; tested simultaneously R1, B 287 6 293 0 293 0.11 

13.3 9.3 18.86 19,277 8,730 500

Stack gas info from 26A run 2; tested simultaneously R2, B 261 0.3 261.3 0 261.3 0.11 

12.8 9.1 18.96 19,960 9,066 500

Stack gas info from 26A run 3; tested simultaneously R3, B 499 0.5 499.5 0 499.5 0.11 

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Trap #1

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C

2.57

R1, A 287 1.0 288.00 20 268 0.11 0% 0.3%

2.36

0.2 4 

2.33

R2, A 251 0.4 251.40 20 231.4 0.11 0% 0.2%

2.05

0.3 6 

4.51

R3, A 498 0.4 498.40 20 478.4 0.11 0% 0.1%

4.31

0.2 2 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) 

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/21/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:32:00 13:20:00 8:20:00

Run Finish Time 12:47:00 16:31:00 11:25:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.436 0.436 0.436 0.436

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.809 0.809 0.809 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.14 29.09 29.14

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.55 1.44 1.43 1.47

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 126.921 126.937 128.166 127.341

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 76.89 83.01 75.22 78.38

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 123.797 122.214 124.976 123.662

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 484.8 500.5 486.5 490.6

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 22.82 23.56 22.90 23.09

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 15.6 16.2 15.5 15.7

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.844 0.838 0.845 0.843

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 8.42 8.35 8.99 8.59

%O2 Oxygen, % 18.58 18.80 18.54 18.64

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 73 72.85 72.47 72.8

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.09 30.09 30.18 30.12

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.21 28.13 28.29 28.21

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.15 29.11 29.06 29.11

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 519 517 508 514

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.119 0.111 0.111 0.114

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 26.0 25.2 24.9 25.4

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 8,204 8,522 8,256 8,327

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 18,609 19,199 18,436 18,748

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.0 98.4 100.1 98.1

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 27.25 8.45 11.25 15.65

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 7.8E-03 2.4E-03 3.2E-03 4.5E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-04 7.5E-05 9.8E-05 1.4E-04

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf Insulation 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL

Source 621 Furnace

Personnel Moore
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:52:00 12:15:00 14:35:00

Run Finish Time 10:58:00 13:19:00 15:38:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.441

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.802 0.802 0.802 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.98 29.10 29.08 29.05

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.58 1.57 1.67 1.60

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 45.982 46.083 46.743 46.269

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 84.42 90.46 88.50 87.79

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 43.844 43.636 44.401 43.960

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 150.3 141.6 138 143.3

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.07 6.67 6.50 6.75

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 13.9 13.3 12.8 13.3

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.861 0.867 0.872 0.867

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 9.47 9.30 9.08 9.3

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.20 18.86 18.96 19.0

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 71.33 71.84 71.96 71.7

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.28 30.24 30.21 30.25

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.58 28.62 28.65 28.62

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.4 -0.40 -0.50 -0.43

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.95 29.07 29.04 29.02

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 521 523 524 523

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.123 0.123 0.132 0.126

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 26.2 26.1 27.0 26.4

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 8,730 8,675 9,066 8,823

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 19,277 19,340 19,960 19,525

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.6 96.9 94.7 96.4

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 900 730 700 777

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 7.2E-01 5.9E-01 5.6E-01 6.2E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.4E-02 1.9E-02 1.9E-02 2.1E-02

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 2300 2100 2300 2233

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+00 1.7E+00 1.8E+00 1.8E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.0E-02 5.6E-02 6.2E-02 5.9E-02

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf Insulation 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL

Source 621 Furnace

Personnel Starkey
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:05:00 11:54:00 13:34:00

Run Finish Time 11:19:00 12:58:00 14:36:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.362 0.362 0.362 0.362

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.806 0.806 0.806 0.81

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.10 29.18 29.08 29.12

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.08 1.11 1.10 1.10

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 47.954 51.382 52.365 50.567

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 92.90 111.13 116.23 106.75

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 45.242 47.061 47.373 46.559

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 67.7 65.1 67.1 66.6

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.19 3.06 3.16 3.14

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.6 6.1 6.3 6.3

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.934 0.939 0.937 0.937

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 2.6 2.8 9.1 4.8

%O2 Oxygen, % 18.2 18.0 19.0 18.4

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.20 79.20 71.96 76.79

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.14 29.17 30.21 29.51

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.41 28.49 29.45 28.78

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.06 29.14 29.04 29.08

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 797 799 801 799

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.204 0.210 0.208 0.207

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.7 38.5 37.9 38.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 29.5 29.5 29.5 29.5

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 26,164 25,462 25,568 25,731

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 68,257 66,790 67,103 67,383

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 103.1 106.1 103.4

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 7390 12000 12000 10463

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 5.8E+00 9.0E+00 8.9E+00 7.9E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.5E-01 8.8E-01 8.6E-01 7.6E-01

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 95 975 133 401

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 7.4E-02 7.3E-01 9.9E-02 3.0E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.1E-03 7.2E-02 9.5E-03 2.9E-02

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 69 176 51 99

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-02 1.3E-01 3.8E-02 7.5E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.1E-03 1.3E-02 3.6E-03 7.2E-03

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf Insulation 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL

Stack 621 Curing Oven

Personnel Luckett
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/20/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:33:00 12:05:00 14:08:00

Run Finish Time 11:42:00 13:46:00 15:21:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.301 0.301 0.301 0.301

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.19 29.16 29.18

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.46 1.58 1.48 1.51

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 45.184 47.214 47.030 46.476

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 86.42 90.25 85.88 87.51

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 42.439 44.064 44.189 43.564

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 50.9 57 57.7 55.2

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.40 2.68 2.72 2.60

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 5.3 5.7 5.8 5.6

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.947 0.943 0.942 0.944

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.00 0.00 0.00

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.80 20.80 20.80 20.80

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.20 79.20 79.20 79.20

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.25 28.21 28.20 28.22

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.14 29.15 29.12 29.13

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 95 96 97 96

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.255 0.274 0.260 0.263

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 28.0 29.2 28.5 28.6

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 165.6 165.6 165.6 165.6

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 252,951 243,585 246,333 247,623

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 290,089 277,984 283,664 283,913

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.6 96.8 100.0 98.2

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 117.0 72.0 140.0 109.7

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 9.7E-02 5.8E-02 1.1E-01 8.9E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.9E-02 5.5E-02 1.0E-01 8.2E-02

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 29 22 26 26

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E-02 1.8E-02 2.1E-02 2.1E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.2E-02 1.7E-02 1.9E-02 1.9E-02

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 14 7 7 9

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-02 5.6E-03 5.6E-03 7.6E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-02 5.3E-03 5.2E-03 7.0E-03

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Knauf Insulation 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL

Stack 621 Forming

Personnel Luckett
APPENDIX B 

Production Data 
APPENDIX C 

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and 

Notes 




































































APPENDIX D 

Equipment Calibration 

Documents 























































APPENDIX E 

Laboratory Analytical 

Reports 
Method Source Run Date Start 

Time

End 

Time O2 CO2

30B 621 Furnace 1 10/19/2010 9:52 11:52 19.20 9.47

26A 621 Furnace 1 10/19/2010 9:52 10:58 19.20 9.47

316 621 Curing Oven 1 10/19/2010 10:05 11:14 18.2 2.6

316 621 Curing Oven 2 10/19/2010 11:54 13:10 18.0 2.8

30B 621 Furnace 2 10/19/2010 12:15 14:15 18.86 9.30

26A 621 Furnace 2 10/19/2010 12:15 13:19 18.86 9.30

316 621 Curing Oven 3 10/19/2010 13:34 14:48 18.4 2.6

30B 621 Furnace 3 10/19/2010 14:35 16:35 18.96 9.08

26A 621 Furnace 3 10/19/2010 14:35 15:38 18.96 9.08

0061 621 Furnace 1 10/20/2010 9:32 12:47 18.58 8.42

29 621 Furnace 1 10/20/2010 9:32 12:47 18.58 8.42

316 621 Forming 1 10/20/2010 10:33 11:42 20.8 0.0

316 621 Forming 2 10/20/2010 12:05 13:46 20.8 0.0

0061 621 Furnace 2 10/20/2010 13:20 16:31 18.80 8.35

29 621 Furnace 2 10/20/2010 13:20 16:31 18.80 8.35

316 621 Forming 3 10/20/2010 14:08 15:21 20.8 0.0

0061 621 Furnace 3 10/21/2010 8:20 11:30 18.54 8.99

29 621 Furnace 3 10/21/2010 8:20 11:30 18.54 8.99

BTEC Job# 10-3990.11

Knauf Insulation; Lanett Alabama














Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight (mg)

Run 1 130 5.5 5.20 5.5 10.7

Run 2 130 5.4 7.60 5.4 13.0

Run 3 180 1.5 3.90 1.5 5.4

Blank 160 ND ND

RDL 1 0.5 0.30

Method 5 PM Lab Results Blank Correction

Corrected

Sampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL - 621 Line

Knauf Insulation
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Filter 

RDL 

(μg)

R1 

Result

(μg)

R2 

Result

(μg)

R3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit (RDL)

(μg)

R1

(μg)

R2 

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 

Arsenic 0.93 0.40 2.1 2.5 ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 

Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 

Cadmium ND 0.10 2.00 1.97 1.26 0.50 2.00 1.97 

Chromium 1.83 0.30 56.00 87.4 44.8 1.5 54.2 85.6 

Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 

Lead 4.66 0.20 22.4 28.3 17.1 1.0 17.7 23.6 

Manganese 1.73 0.75 3.8 ND ND 3.8 3.8 3.8 

Nickel 0.61 0.50 5.3 4.4 ND 2.5 4.7 3.8 

Selenium 5.00 1.0 12.4 9.9 11.3 5.0 7.4 5.0 

Knauf Insulation

Method 29 Lab Results Blank Correction

Corrected

Sampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL - 621 Line
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg] RDL

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Run 1 1000 300 28.0 1.0 27.25

Run 2 890 300 9.2 0.9 8.45

Run 3 990 300 12.0 1.0 11.25

Blank H2O 270 ND 0.10

Blank KOH 320 0.80 0.20

Method 0061 Lab Results Blank Correction

Sampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL - 621 Line

Knauf Insulation
Volume (mL)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrofluoric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hyd

Ac

Run 1 410 900 2300 900 Run 2 480 730 2100 730 Run 3 450 700 2300 700 

Blank H20 230 ND ND

Blank H2SO4 220 ND ND

RDL 1 200 200

Corrected

Method 26A Lab Results Blank Correction

Knauf Insulation

Lanett, AL - 621 Line

BTEC job # 10-3990.11

Sampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010
Volume 

[ml]

Formaldehyde 

[μg]

Methanol 

[μg] RDL

Phenol 

[μg] RDL

Formaldehyde 

[μg]

Metha

[μg

Blank UFDI 290 ND ND ND

Run 1 355 116.5 29 4 ND 14 117 29 

Run 2 350 72 22 4 ND 7 72 22 

Run 3 400 140 26 4 ND 7 140 26 

Run 1 304 7390 95 4 69 7* 7390 95 

Run 2 360 12000 975 4 176 7 12000 97

Run 3 350 12000 133 4 51 7 12000 13

621 

Forming

621 

Curing 

Oven

Method 316 Lab Results Blank Correction

Correc

Sampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.11

Lanett, AL - 621 Line

Knauf Insulation
Your Project #: 10-3990.11 

 Site: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/09

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F1923

Received: 2010/10/26, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/29 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 5 8 H P 8 6 6 8 H P 8 6 8 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/21 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

10:00 13:40 17:00

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 5.5 5.4 0.5 2311260

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 5.20 7.60 0.30 2312476

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 160 130 130 1 2311266

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 9 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/21

12:00

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.5 0.5 2311260

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 3.90 0.30 2312476

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 180 1 2311266

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 5 8 H P 8 6 6 8 H P 8 6 6 8 H P 8 6 8 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/21 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

10:00 13:40 13:40 17:00

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.0 2320837

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.93 0.40 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.0 2320837

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2320837

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 2.00 2.00 1.97 0.50 2320837

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.83 0.30 56.0 56.9 87.4 1.5 2320837

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2320837

Total Lead (Pb) ug 4.66 0.20 22.4 22.5 28.3 1.0 2320837

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.73 0.75 3.8 4.4 ND 3.8 2320837

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.61 0.50 5.3 5.3 4.4 2.5 2320837

Total Selenium (Se) ug 5.0 1.0 12.4 12.1 9.9 5.0 2320837

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 9 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/21

12:00

 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 2.0 2320837

Total Arsenic (As) ug ND 2.0 2320837

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.50 2320837

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 1.26 0.50 2320837

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 44.8 1.5 2320837

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.50 2320837

Total Lead (Pb) ug 17.1 1.0 2320837

Total Manganese (Mn) ug ND 3.8 2320837

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 2.5 2320837

Total Selenium (Se) ug 11.3 5.0 2320837

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HP8658 Collected 2010/10/21

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Maxxam ID HP8668 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Maxxam ID HP8668 D u p Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R

Maxxam ID HP8689 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Maxxam ID HP8690 Collected 2010/10/21

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Sample #HP8658-01R negative weight observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except HP8658, due to the matrix (high levels of B)

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HP8668.

Trace level Ni and As were observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.11

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F1923

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2311260 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/02 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2320837 N_R Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 91 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 1.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 4.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 6.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 94 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 4.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HP8668) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 2.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 1.8 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 98 % 85 - 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.11

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F1923

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2320837 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 3.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 0.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 0.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 3.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 2.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 93 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 3.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 2.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 3.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 2.3 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 1.02, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 1.00, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 1.63, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 1.58, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.11

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F1923

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2320837 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 1.6 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 0.5 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110110 Report

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng

Sect.1

 Mass ng

Sect.2

Spike 

Level

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in

Stack Comments

Variability +- 10%

Calibration Report Available

(248)-548-8072

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .422 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/1/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Plant/Source Lannett, Alabama 

80257 621 Furnace 11/1/2010 Dr. Qiao He 499 0.5 10/19/2010 RUN 3 Trap B

80258 621 Furnace 11/1/2010 Dr. Qiao He 498 0.4 20 10/19/2010 RUN 3 Trab A

80271 621 Furnace 11/1/2010 Dr. Qiao He 287 6.0 10/19/2010 RUN 1 Trap B

80283 621 Furnace 11/1/2010 Dr. Qiao He 251 0.4 20 10/19/2010 RUN 2 Trap A

80281 621 Furnace 11/1/2010 Dr. Qiao He 287 1.0 20 10/19/2010 RUN 1 Trap A

80277 621 Furnace 11/1/2010 Dr. Qiao He 261 0.3 10/19/2010 RUN 2 Trap B
Your Project #: 10-3990.11 

Site: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/08

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F2622

Received: 2010/10/27, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/29 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2622 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/08 Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 8 7 H Q 2 1 8 8 H Q 2 1 8 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

10:00 10:00 14:30

 U n i t s R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 270 1 320 1 1000 1 2314624

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.1 0.8 0.2 28 1 2314620

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 8 9 H Q 2 1 9 0 H Q 2 1 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

14:30 17:15 12:00

 U n i t s RUN 1-M0061 RDL RUN 2-M0061 RDL RUN 3-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 1 890 1 990 1 2314624

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 28 1 9.2 0.9 12 1 2314620

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2622 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/08 Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2187 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2188 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2189 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2189 D u p Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Maxxam ID HQ2190 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2191 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2622 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/08 Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.11

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F2622

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2314620 LLE Matrix Spike

(HQ2189) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 101 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 101 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 0.6 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5
Your Project #: 10-3990.11 

Site: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/09

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F2035

Received: 2010/10/26, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/05 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 1 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2035 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H P 9 2 7 3 H P 9 2 7 4 H P 9 2 7 5 H P 9 2 7 5 H P 9 2 7 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

16:50 16:50 11:35 11:35 13:40

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-.1N RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 230 220 410 480 1 2319796

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 900 930 730 200 2321427

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2300 2400 2100 200 2321427

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H P 9 2 8 2

Sampling Date 2010/10/19

15:55

COC Number N/A

 U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 450 1 2319796

Hydrochloric Acid ug 700 200 2321427

Hydrofluoric Acid ug 2300 200 2321427

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2035 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HP9273 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9274 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID BLANK-.1N H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9275 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9275 D u p Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9276 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9282 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Page 3 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2035 Client Project #: 10-3990.11

Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.11

P.O. #:

Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F2035

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2321427 A_S Matrix Spike

(HP9275) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 93 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 99 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 98 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 102 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 0.5 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5
Your Project #: 10-286B 

Site: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK 

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/15

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F2620

Received: 2010/10/27, 11:40

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 18

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Formaldehyde (M316) 10 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316 

Final Volume of Impinger 10 N/A 2010/11/02 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) (1 ) 10 N/A 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 6 5 H Q 2 1 6 6 H Q 2 1 7 5

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/20 2010/10/19

14:20 15:10 12:00

 U n i t s RB-CURINGOVEN-HPLC RB-FORMINGSTACK-HPLC RDL R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 RDL QC Batch

H2O H2O

Formaldehyde ug ND ND 7.3 6600 120 2316899

Volume ml 290 290 1 230 1 2316904

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 6 H Q 2 1 7 6 H Q 2 1 7 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

12:05 12:05 13:30

 U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 RDL R2-CURINGOVEN-M316 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug 790 790 19 12000 180 2316899

Volume ml 74 1 360 1 2316904

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 8 H Q 2 1 7 9 H Q 2 1 8 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

15:00 12:20 12:25

 U n i t s R3-CURINGOVEN-M316 RDL R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-M316 RDL R1-FSTACK-IMP3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 12000 170 110 6.6 6.5 2.4 2316899

Volume ml 350 1 260 1 95 1 2316904

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H Q 2 7 8 3 H Q 2 7 8 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

14:00 15:45

 U n i t s R2-FSTACK-M316 RDL R3-FSTACK-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 72 8.8 140 9.9 2316899

Volume ml 350 1 400 1 2316904

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 6 5 H Q 2 1 6 6 H Q 2 1 6 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/20 2010/10/19

14:20 15:10 12:10

 U n i t s RB-CURINGOVEN-HPLC RB-FORMINGSTACK-HPLC RDL R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA RDL QC Batch

H2O H2O

Methanol ug ND ND 30 56 4 2314971

Phenol ug ND ND 50 62 7 2314971

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 6 8 H Q 2 1 6 9 H Q 2 1 7 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19

12:15 13:35 15:05

 U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA R2-CURINGOVEN-VOA R3-CURINGOVEN-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 39 975 133 4 2314971

Phenol ug ND 176 51 7 2314971

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 1 H Q 2 1 7 1 H Q 2 1 7 2 H Q 2 1 7 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

12:30 12:30 12:35 14:05

 U n i t s R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA R1-FSTACK-IMP3-VOA R2-FSTACK-VOA RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Methanol ug 25 25 ND 22 4 2314971

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 7 2314971

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/20

15:50

 U n i t s R3-FSTACK-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 26 4 2314971

Phenol ug ND 7 2314971

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2165 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID RB-CURINGOVEN-HPLC H2O Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2166 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RB-FORMINGSTACK-HPLC H2O Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2167 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2168 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2169 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2170 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Page 6 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2171 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2171 D u p Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2172 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP3-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2173 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R2-FSTACK-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2174 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R3-FSTACK-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2175 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2176 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Page 7 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2176 D u p Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/08 2010/11/02 LLE

Maxxam ID HQ2177 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2178 Collected 2010/10/19

Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2179 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2180 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP3-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2783 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R2-FSTACK-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Page 8 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2784 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID R3-FSTACK-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Page 9 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B

Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HQ2165-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=288.8 ml

Sample HQ2166-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=290.6 ml

Sample HQ2167-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2168-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2169-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2170-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2171-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2172-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2173-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HQ2174-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Formaldehyde (M316): Negative absorbance observed for samples in this job.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 10 of 11
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-286B

P.O. #:

Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F2620

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2314971 SPS Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/11/08 100 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 106 % N/A

Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 108 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 108 % N/A

Method Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=6 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Methanol 2010/11/08 0 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 NC % 50

2316899 LLE Matrix Spike

(HQ2176) Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 97 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 99 % 91 - 107

Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 ND, RDL=2.5 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 0.1 % 20

N/A = Not Applicable

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 11 of 11