alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 424 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 424

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules relating 
  to listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming 
   under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2017

Mr. Peterson (for himself, Mr. Duffy, Ms. Cheney, Mr. Nolan, Mr. Emmer, 
    Mr. Labrador, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. 
Gallagher, Mr. Kind, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Grothman, and Mr. 
   Bergman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules relating 
  to listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming 
   under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gray Wolf State Management Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING GRAY WOLVES IN THE WESTERN 
              GREAT LAKES.

    Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the 
final rule published on December 28, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 81666), without 
regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to 
issuance of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject to judicial 
review.

SEC. 3. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING GRAY WOLVES IN WYOMING.

    Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the 
final rule published on September 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 55530), 
without regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that 
applies to issuance of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject 
to judicial review.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our reports dated February 21, 2006 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Shared-Based Payment*, in2005), and management’s report of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sky Financial Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

Form S-8 No. 333-125403 

Form S-3No. 333-117186 

Form S-8 No. 333-117185 

Form S-8 No. 333-117184 

Form S-8 No. 333-108810 

Form S-8 No. 333-65492 

Form S-8No. 333-59312 

Form S-8 No. 333-67233 

Form S-8 No. 333-47315 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4) 

Form S-8No. 333-60741 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4) 

Form S-3 No. 333-64127 

Form S-8 No. 333-18867 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Cleveland, Ohio 

February 21, 2006
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2844

___________ Larry D. Pint, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa Solvay America, Inc., and * Solvay Animal Health, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 22, 1999 Filed: May 28, 1999

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and MOODY, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM. Larry Pint appeals the District Court's grant of a motion to dismiss and a grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of Solvay America, Inc., and Solvay Animal Health, Inc., on Pint's claims brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Iowa Civil Rights Act, Iowa Code § 216.1 et seq., and Iowa state law.2 The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, United States Distrtict Judge for the

Northern District of Iowa and The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern Distrtict of Iowa, to whom the motion for summary judgment was submitted by consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2- The District Court correctly analyzed the applicable legal principles as they applied to the facts of this case. 2 Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Eighth Circuit Rule 47B. AFFIRMED. A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Matter of the Petition to Annex Certain Described Real Estate to STOCK DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ADAIR COUNTY, Oklahoma.

No. 38125.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Oct. 7, 1958.

J. Fred Green, Fred D. Green and R. Bruce Green, Sallisaw, for plaintiffs in error.

Jack Bliss, Tahlequah, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal by petition in error with case-made attached from a judgment ordering annexation of certain sections of land to Stock District No. 2, Adair County, Oklahoma. The court’s judgment was entered August 17, 1957, and the motion for new trial was overruled on September 25, 1957. The case-made was certified by the trial judge on December 16, 1957. The petition in error with case-made attached was not filed in this court until January 18, 1958.

Since the appeal was not perfected for failure of the appellants to file their petition in error within 20 days from the date the case-made was settled, the appeal must be dismissed. Video Independent Theatres, Inc., v. Walker, Okl., 308 P.2d 958.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, V. C. J., and HALLEY, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.

WELCH, C. J., and DAVISON and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent.

The Court acknowledges the aid of the Supreme Court Commission in the preparation of this opinion. After a tentative *598opinion was written by the Commission the cause was assigned to a Justice of this Court. Thereafter, upon a report and consideration in conference, the foregoing opinion was adopted by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ralph
Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of Command Center, Inc.  (the
"Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March
27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
15, 2009








/s/Ralph
Peterson





Ralph
Peterson


Chief
Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5479-S5480]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         RECOGNIZING DAVID WISE

 Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I would like to take the 
opportunity to express my appreciation to David Wise for his hard work 
as an intern in the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. I recognize his 
efforts and contributions to my office as well as to the State of 
Wyoming.
  David is a native of McLean, VA and graduated from Langley High 
School. He attends Clemson University where he is majoring in political 
science. He has demonstrated a strong work ethic, which has made him an 
invaluable asset to the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. The quality 
of his work is reflected in his great efforts over the last several 
months.
  I want to thank David for the dedication he has shown while working 
for me and my staff. It was a pleasure to have him as part of our team. 
I know

[[Page S5480]]

he will have continued success with all of his future endeavors. I wish 
him all my best on his next journey.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1386]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 HONORING MONSIGNOR FELIX S. DIOMARTICH

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JANICE HAHN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Ms. HAHN. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor Monsignor Felix S. Diomartich, 
the oldest priest in the City of Los Angeles and the Sibenik region of 
Croatia, who is celebrating 75 years of service in the priesthood. 
Monsignor Diomartich was born on November 2, 1914, in Zlarin, Croatia. 
He began his life's journey at the parish of Vodice as the Associate 
Pastor. Soon after, he was named Secretary to Bishop Mileta. He later 
earned two doctorate degrees in theology and church law at the 
Gregorian University in Rome, Italy. Before leaving for the United 
States, he obtained the title of the lawyer of the Sacra Romana Rota.
  After arriving in the United States, Monsignor Diomartich served at 
three parishes in the Archdiocese of New York before he was invited to 
serve at St. Anthony Croatian Church in Los Angeles. Monsignor 
Diomartich served for 36 years as an administrator and as a pastor. He 
supported such organizations as the St. Ann's Altar Society for women 
and the Holy Name Society for men. He founded two new societies for 
American-born young adults called the Anthonians and the St. Anthony's 
Women's Guild. His other accomplishments at the parish include the St. 
Anthony's Annual Picnic Festival, building of a new rectory, and 
remodeling and expanding the original parish hall.
  In 1978, Pope Paul VI awarded him the title of Monsignor. The 
Croatian National Association and Foundation awarded him with its 
Lifetime Achievement award in 2008. Though he has retired from its 
administration, Monsignor Diomartich continues to reside at the St. 
Anthony Croatian Church, helping with masses and confessions. Through 
his passion of spreading the word of God, he has inspired and guided 
the residents of Los Angeles and has brought unity and pride to the 
Croatian community.
  He has truly made a difference in the lives of so many people. It has 
been a privilege to call him a friend and to celebrate this significant 
milestone.

                          ____________________
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adrian Gonzalez, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered January 22, 1988, convicting him of assault in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements made by him.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While the defendant was awaiting arraignment on arson charges, he allegedly assaulted three officers. The defendant was then taken to the office of the Nassau County Police Department’s Third Detective Squad where he was handcuffed to a bench. Detective Farrell, who was assigned to investigate the assault, was standing about 14 feet from the defendant when Farrell was approached by another detective and asked about the assault. As Farrell explained what had happened, the defendant screamed out, “Yes, I hit the officers, I hit the officers. I don’t know why. I just bugged out”.

We reject the defendant’s contention that his statements should have been suppressed. The hearing court properly found that the defendant’s statements were spontaneous since an objective observer would not conclude that the police conduct was reasonably likely to elicit a response *(see, People v Betancourt,*173 AD2d 481; *see also, People v Maerling,*46 NY2d 289; *People v Bryant,*87 AD2d 873, *affd*59 NY2d 786). The defendant was sitting about 14 feet from where the detectives were discussing the case. Further, Detective Farrell testified that he used a conversational tone, and the conversation was not directed at the defendant nor was it designed to provoke a response from the defendant.

*138We further find that the testimony of the police officers who were victims of the assault, as substantiated by the objective evidence, was sufficient to establish that each of the officers suffered a "physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *see, People v Rojas,*61 NY2d 726; *People v Pagan,*160 AD2d 284; *People v Rodriguez,*159 AD2d 251; *People v McMahon,*157 AD2d 548; *Matter of Christopher T.,*156 AD2d 190; *People v Murray,*156 AD2d 722; *People v Esquilin,*141 AD2d 838). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 21 May 2007 – Kronberger v Parliament**

**(Case T-18/07 R)**

Interim proceedings – Act concerning the election of Members of the European Parliament – Application for interim measures – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency – ‘Prima facie case’ – Cumulative
conditions (Art. 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 23-24)*

2.                     *Applications for interim measures – Conditions of admissibility – Admissibility of main application – Irrelevance – Limits
(Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(1), second subpara.) (see para. 27)*

3.                     *Actions for annulment – Jurisdiction of the Community Courts (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 37-38)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| APPLICATION for interim measures seeking to obtain, first, a provisional declaration that the award of a seat in the European Parliament to its current holder is invalid, and second, a provisional award of that seat to the applicant. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the application for interim measures; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Reserves the costs. |
**316 (b)**  **RULE TELEPHONE LOG** 

Name of Caller: John Sunda, Tetra Tech Date: May 24, 2012 Company Name: Ovivo (formerly Eimco) Person Contacted: Trent Gathright Title: Sales Manager Telephone #: 281

- 480

- 7955 Email: trent.gathright@ovivowater.com Called to inquire about the relative costs between conventional through flow traveling screens and similar screens with modified Ristroph features

. Ovivo (formerl y Eimco) i s an equipment vendor for traveling screens and other technologies. Assuming that the mesh size is the same (e.g., 3/8 inch coarse mesh), then the difference in costs will be roughly 24% to 26% for screens where the original debris return trough is on the downstream ( des cending) side of the screen. If the original debris return trough is on the upstream (ascending) side, then a taller screen will be necessary and the difference in costs will be around 30%. Mr. Gathright said about 30% to 45% of existing screens have the debris trough on the upstream side. These costs appl y to the traveling screen and adjacent fish return and debris troughs and do not include the combined fish return leading away from the screens or additional spray

washwater pumps which are the responsibility of the owners.
Exhibit








Leo Pound Compensation Arrangements
		
	•
	Service as Interim CEO from March 30, 2018 through July 17, 2018 and as Interim Strategic Executive from July 18, 2018 through September 30, 2018; all compensation to be paid under this agreement relates to interim executive service during the terms described, including any payments made subsequent to September 30, 2018.


		
	•
	Monthly compensation to be $50,000 per month for service as Interim CEO and Interim Strategic Executive, retroactive to March 29, 2018, payable monthly, with accrued amounts payable upon signing.


		
	•
	$200,000 bonus to be paid upon signing of this agreement as supplemental compensation for completion of amendments of credit facility.


		
	•
	Additional payment of $250,000 payable on October 18, 2018 for services rendered as Interim CEO. 


		
	•
	Additional payment of $250,000 payable on January 18, 2019 for services rendered as Interim Strategic Executive. 


		
	•
	Duties as Interim Strategic Executive will consist of working full-time, four days per week, to assist new CEO, including transitioning into role, cash management and cost reduction initiatives.  Key items during transition:


		
	o
	Complete staffing of finance team


		
	o
	Complete accounts receivable discount repayment plan


		
	o
	Recapture cash not covered by deposit account control agreement and finish cash management line-up


		
	o
	Implement controls on purchasing cards, accounts payable, inventory and fixed assets


		
	o
	Develop key performance indicators and bridge analysis for reports to banks/Board/investor relations


		
	o
	Develop plans for following:


		
	▪
	Retrieve perpetual care funds and merchandise funds that can be disbursed from trust due to defaulted purchases


		
	▪
	Strategy for repurchasing plots that will not be used


		
	▪
	Insurance plan substitution funds















	
		
	/s/ Leo Pound                       
	StoneMor GP LLC

	Leo Pound
	 

	Date: July 26, 2018              
	By:  /s/ Robert B. Hellman, Jr.            

	 
	Name:  Robert B. Hellman, Jr.

	 
	Title:  Chairman of Board of StoneMor GP LLC

	 
	 

	 
	Date: July 26, 2018
# C_2010161EN.01000701.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2010 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-346/08) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/80/EC - Pollution and nuisance - Combustion plants - Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air - Directive not applied to the Lynemouth power plant (United Kingdom))

(2010/C 161/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agents)

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: L. Seeboruth, acting as Agent, and D. Wyatt QC)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement, so far as concerns the power plant in Lynemouth, Northumberland, of Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants (OJ 2001 L 309, p. 1) — Failure to have achieved significant reductions in emissions from that plant within the period prescribed in Article 4(3) of the directive

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to apply Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants to the power plant operated by Rio Tinto Alcan Smelting and Power (UK) Ltd in Lynemouth, in north-east England, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to apply Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants to the power plant operated by Rio Tinto Alcan Smelting and Power (UK) Ltd in Lynemouth, in north-east England, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4271 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4271

   To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that 
 restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2017

Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. 
    Lee, Mrs. Dingell, Ms. Meng, Mrs. Napolitano, and Ms. Hanabusa) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
 the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, 
Homeland Security, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that 
 restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that Executive Order 13780 and the presidential 
proclamation issued on September 24, 2017--
            (1) violate the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1101 et seq.), which states that no person can be discriminated 
        against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the 
        person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of 
        residence; and
            (2) violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment 
        to the United States Constitution and the equal protection 
        component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to 
        the United States Constitution.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS.

    No funds, resources, or fees made available to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security, or to any other official of a Federal agency, by 
this Act or any other Act for any fiscal year, may be used to implement 
or enforce Executive Order 13780, signed on March 6, 2017, or the 
presidential proclamation issued on September 24, 2017.
                                 <all>
```