alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 138 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-108, CP2024-112.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28053 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2010024EN.01000801.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 December 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Bundesfinanzdirektion West v Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH

(Case C-260/08) (1)

1

(Community Customs Code - Article 24 - Non-preferential origin of goods - Definition of ‘substantial processing or working’ - Criterion for a change of tariff heading - Steel cables manufactured in North Korea using stranded steel wire originating in China)

2010/C 24/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundesfinanzdirektion West

Applicant:

Defendant: Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) –Determining the origin of steel cables manufactured in North Korea under a process using steel wires originating in China — Criteria to be taken into consideration for the purpose of treating a given manufacturing stage as establishing the non-preferential origin of a product — Potential significance of the fact that the tariff heading remains unchanged subsequent to the processing at issue.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

With regard to goods classified under heading 7312 of the Combined Nomenclature constituting Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005, ‘substantial processing or working’ within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, may cover not only such processing or working as leads to the goods which have undergone the process being classified under a different heading of the Combined Nomenclature, but also such processing or working as results, without such a change of heading, in the creation of a product with properties and a composition of its own which it did not have before the process.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Bonham, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: March 8, 2011
/s/ STEVEN D. BONHAMSteven D. BonhamChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-90295 of Lahaina Acquisitions,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January
11,  2000,   appearing  in  this  Annual   Report  on  Form  10-K/A  of  Lahaina
Acquisitions, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 1999.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
April 25, 2000

                                       48
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 241 (Monday, December 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD18-6-000]


Notice of Availability of Revised Final Engineering Guidelines 
for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 11--Arch Dams

    On March 14, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued 
a Notice of Availability of Final Engineering Guidelines for the 
Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 11--Arch Dams. Appendix 11A 
provides an approach to estimate erosion of rock downstream of arch 
dams and is applicable to similar evaluations at other types of dams. 
Commission staff recently became aware of errors in several equations 
and one table in Appendix 11A; this notice provides a revised version 
of Chapter 11 correcting those errors.
    All information related to ``Chapter 11--Arch Dams,'' including the 
draft chapter, all submitted comments, the final chapter, and the 
revised final chapter incorporating the revisions to Appendix A, can be 
found on the FERC website (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click 
on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket 
number, excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field 
(i.e., AD18-6). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. 
The Commission also offers a free service called eSubscription which 
allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in 
specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you spend 
researching proceedings by automatically providing you with electronic 
notification of these filings and direct links to the documents. Go to 
the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov), select the FERC Online option 
from the left-hand column, and click on eSubscription. Users must be 
registered in order to use eSubscription.
    The revised version of Chapter 11 is also available on the 
Commission's Division of Dam Safety and Inspections website at: 
Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects 
[verbar] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (ferc.gov).
    For assistance with any of the Commission's online systems, please 
contact FERC Online Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92d4f7e0f1ddfcfefbfcf7c1e7e2e2fde0e6d2aef3b2fae0f7f4af" http: ferc.gov">ferc.gov</a>">FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov</a> or toll free 
at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8258.

    Dated: December 12, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27751 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,003,896
<SECURITIES>                                 4,935,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                  747,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,948
<INVENTORY>                                    489,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,204,894
<PP&E>                                       8,172,126
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,008,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,302,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       144,878
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,302,378
<SALES>                                      2,177,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,720,444
<CGS>                                          963,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  963,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,762,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,466,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,466,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 11, 2017

No. 04-17-00274-CR

Donald Lee MINSON, JR.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-1577-CR-A

Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Lori Schmid’s notification of late record is hereby GRANTED IN PART. The reporter’s 

record is due no later than September 11, 2017.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of August, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2018352EN.01004701.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/47

---

Action brought on 20 August 2018 — ZPC Flis v EUIPO — Aldi Einkauf (Happy Moreno choco)

(Case T-498/18)

(2018/C 352/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZPC Flis sp.j. (Radziejowice, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Happy Moreno choco — Application for registration No 15 028 087

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 May 2018 in Case R 1464/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the EUIPO for reconsideration;
  or |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the EUIPO for reconsideration;

or

| — | alter the contested decision by stating that there are no relative grounds for refusal of registration of the EUTMA 015028087 ‘Happy Moreno choco’ for all goods in classes 30 and 35 and the trademark shall be registered; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision by stating that there are no relative grounds for refusal of registration of the EUTMA 015028087 ‘Happy Moreno choco’ for all goods in classes 30 and 35 and the trademark shall be registered;

| — | award the costs in the Applicant’s favour. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs in the Applicant’s favour.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty.

---
#### In the Matter of the Habeas Corpus of Charles B. SIMMONS, Petitioner.

No. A-12450.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 23, 1957.

Charles B. Simmons, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Owen J.~ Watts, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.' •

PER CURIAM.

Charles B. Simmons has filed in this' court a petition for a writ of habeas cor-pus seeking his release from prison. It is alleged that he is confined in the state penitentiary at McAlester by virtue of judgment and sentence of the District Court of Grady County, wherein petitioner entered a plea of guilty to two counts of armed robbery and was committed to the penitentiary to serve a term of 40 years on each count; said terms to run concurrently.

The petition evidently was prepared without the benefit of an attorney, and it is difficult to determine upon what grounds the petitioner complains, but from all indications, petitioner contends that the judgment and sentence of the court was excessive. That he was maneuvered into signing a statement attesting his guilt by the connivance of the county attorney and that his court appointed attorney owed his loyalty to the court and was no more than a legalistic formality and concludes his petition with a prayer to modify what he terms a cruel and unusual punishment.

To this petition, the Attorney General has filed his demurrer. This court has consistently adherred to the rule that on habeas corpus proceedings, it is limited' in its inquiry to matters which are jurisdictional in nature and the writ of habeas corpus is not proper procedure to correct errors occurring at trial, including question as to excessive punishment.

In the case of Perry v. Waters, 97 Okl.Cr. 17, 256 P.2d 1119, this court said:

> “Question of whether a sentence was excessive under the facts may not be inquired into on Habeas Corpus, *294but is a matter to be considered on appeal from conviction.”

Also, see Ex parte Billy, Okl.Cr., 266 P.2d 488.

The matters raised by the petitioner were clearly matters to be determined by an appeal and this court will not permit the writ of habeas corpus to lie as a substitute for appeal. Numerous cases decided by this court have so held. A more recent case, In re Riddle, Okl.Cr., 292 P.2d 1043, adequately states the rule:

> “Writ of habeas corpus cannot be invoiced for the purpose of reviewing acts of courts of record, when they act within their jurisdiction, nor can it be invoked for1 the purpose of correcting irregularities or error, or as substitute for an appeal.”

We are not here presented with a situation whereby relief could be granted by way of habeas corpus, therefore, the writ is denied.
# C_2009055EN.01000501.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-259/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Preservation and maintenance of habitats - Classification of special protection areas - Prohibition of hunting and capture - Incorrect transposition)

(2009/C 55/07)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Patakia and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Skandalou, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to transpose Article 3(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1) — Incorrect transposition of Article 3(2), Article 4(1), Article 5 and Article 8(1) of that directive

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to transpose fully and/or correctly the obligations under Article 3(1) and (2), Article 4(1), Article 5 and Article 8(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to transpose fully and/or correctly the obligations under Article 3(1) and (2), Article 4(1), Article 5 and Article 8(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209 of 15.8.2008.

1

---
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Mark
J. Ahn, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Hana Biosciences,
      Inc. (the “Registrant”);
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
      and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
      May 13, 2005
    
    /s/
      Mark J.
      AhnMark
      J. AhnPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer