alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Re: Response to EPA Comments On Fault Tree Analysis Outline for

HCR-188C 

Margaret Sheppard to: Riskscicom, richard 04/10/2008 02:54 PM

Cc: Dave Godwin, Julius Banks, Karen Thundiyil, Cindy Newberg,

Monica Shimamura

Follow Up: Normal Priority. 

Richard and Gary,

A question came up as I was discussing with colleagues your point about OSHA requirements. Which

OSHA requirements do you believe apply, and what are the relevant citations in 29 CFR 1910? 

In addition, for a disposal center, how would the employer know that those requirements apply during work

with a refrigerator or a window AC unit containing HCR-188C if they are accustomed to working with

non-flammable refrigerants in those appliances?

Margaret Sheppard

USEPA/Stratospheric Protection Division

SNAP Program

Tel. 202-343-9163

Fax 202-343-2362

email: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov
#### Vincent Murphy, Appellant, *v.*Eugene Murphy, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

November 25, 1958.

*Victor N. Pacor*for appellant.

*Harold A. Coven*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate dismissal of action and for entry of judgment under terms of stipulation, dismissed. The order is not appealable (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154). This is without prejudice to the right of entry of judgment upon the dismissal of the action in the court below and such proceedings with respect thereto as either party may be advised.

Concur — Pette, Di Gtovanna and Brown, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          83,000
<SECURITIES>                                    17,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,600
<PP&E>                                       1,090,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,064,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,500
<BONDS>                                        463,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     502,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,064,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Treasure Mountain  Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), Lane Clissold, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his  knowledge,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   Lane Clissold
-------------------
      Lane Clissold
      Principal Accounting Officer
      May 20, 2003

                                      -1-
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), I, Clarence W. Peckham,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Clarence W. Peckham

Clarence W. Peckham
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1384]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  IN RECOGNITION OF THE CAREER AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF SEYMOUR S. LEVANDER

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. GARY L. ACKERMAN

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. ACKERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the exceptional 
achievements and outstanding career of Seymour S. Levander. Sy, as his 
friends and family know him, will turn 89 years old later this year, is 
a beloved father and grandfather. Sy, the son of immigrant refugees 
from Europe, began his version of the American Dream growing up in the 
Bronx, graduating from James Madison High School in 1941. He continued 
his academic studies at Cooper Union University, graduating in 1944 and 
teaching electrical engineering there for a short time.
  Sy then started designing and selling equipment for the building 
trade, which was booming at that time in post-war America. In the 
1950s, Sy, seeing an opportunity, struck out on his own and started his 
own business which he owned and ran until he sold the firm at the age 
of 66 at his wife Ellenore's request. However, retirement didn't take 
with Sy, and he continued to work. At the tender young age of 71, he 
started a new engineering and sales firm with younger partners where he 
continues his storied career in the construction industry to this day, 
still going in to work at age 88. Sy's knowledge, work ethic, and old-
fashioned integrity are the stuff of legend in the industry. Over the 
years, he has been honored several times by ASHRAE, the nationwide 
building technology society, as well as other industry organizations.
  Sy has also been a terrific community leader and a fighter for the 
underdog throughout his life. Through his businesses and a lifetime of 
charitable endeavors, he has created opportunities for people from all 
walks of life and backgrounds. In addition, he and his beloved wife 
Ellenore, who unfortunately passed away this year after 67 years of 
marriage, were founders of the Pelham Jewish Center, which has been a 
primary focus of his energies and care for many years.
  Mr. Speaker, while he has many achievements to his name, Sy is most 
proud of his two children, a doctor and a lawyer; his daughter-in-law, 
an architect; and his four grandchildren, who are, respectively, the 
first trumpet for the San Francisco Opera and a music professor at 
Berkley, a doctor interning at Stony Brook University Medical Center, a 
law student and Human Rights Fellow at Columbia University Law School, 
and a rising junior at Dartmouth College. I ask all of our colleagues 
to rise and join me in honoring Seymour S. Levander.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-101]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed December 4, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through December 11, 2023 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

*Notice:*                     Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxapps.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-II/​public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20230175, Draft*, Caltrans, CA, Last Chance Grade Permanent Restoration Project,  Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2024, Contact: Steve Croteau 707-572-7149.                

*EIS No. 20230176, Draft*, USACE, FL, Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Western Everglades Restoration Project Draft Integrated Project Implementation Report and Environmental Impact Statement,  Comment Period Ends: 01/29/2024, Contact: Melissa Nasuti 904-251-9597.                

*EIS No. 20230177*, Draft, BLM, AK, ANCSA 17(d)(1) Withdrawals,  Comment Period Ends: 02/14/2024, Contact: Racheal Jones 907-290-0307.                

*EIS No. 20230178*, Final, BOEM, NY, Sunrise Wind Project,  Review Period Ends: 01/16/2024, Contact: Genevieve Brune 703-787-1553.                

Dated: December 12, 2023.

Julie Smith,

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2023-27642 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.33-80081) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33130) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.,
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47388) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.,
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70620) pertaining to the1995 Equity Incentive Plan of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.,
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-98135) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan and 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of Silicon Storage Technology,
Inc.,
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108345) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 7. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-152164) pertaining to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated January 4, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of Advanced Chip Engineering Technology Inc. included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/    ERNST &
YOUNG

Certified Public Accountants

Taipei,
Taiwan

Republic of China

March 19, 2009
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors 

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the related condensedconsolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Thesefinancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiriesof persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of anopinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally acceptedaccounting principles. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented herein and in our report dated September 12, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the informationset forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. 

 

 

/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

February 6, 2006
EXHIBIT  99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PW Preferred Yield Fund
II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  I,  Stephen R. Dyer, President and Director of General Equipment
Management  II,  Inc.,  general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Partnership.

       By:     General  Equipment  Management  II,  Inc.
               Administrative  General  Partner

       By:     /s/  Stephen  R.  Dyer
               Stephen  R.  Dyer
               President  and  Director
               General  Equipment  Management  II,  Inc

Date:  August  14,  2002
Supplemental Guidance on the Submission of Petitions under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

You are receiving this letter because you have submitted a petition for exemption to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112

- 95)

. This letter is to inform you that on September 25
, 2014 the FAA released Public Guidance for Petitions for Exemption Filed under Section 333, which was not available to you at the time you submitted your petition.

T he FAA recommends that you review the guidance and , if you would like to submit additional information to support your petition
, please submit it to your specific docket at www.regulations.gov

. This additional information will assist the FAA in making an effective evaluation of the requested relief.

The guidance is available at http://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section _333/how_to_file_a_petition/

.

Additiona lly, t he FAA granted an exemption to Astraeus Aerial on September 25
, 2014 which you may also wish to review. This grant of exemption is available at ht tp://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/media/Astraeus_Aerial

- 11062.pdf

.

You may send supplemental information to the specific docket for your petition for exemption at any time providing further information supporting the request for exemption.
ir 

t^ c 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

41 North 73 West, Inc., dba AVITAT 

Westchester and Jet Systems 

COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT 

The County of Westchester, New York 

RESPONDENT/APPELLEE 

Docket No. 16-07-13 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

C 5 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abpvereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federaliy- S 

Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14CFRPart 16. Pursuant to 14CFRPart l6f" 

subpart B, the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is 

hereby extended to June 30, 2009. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination 

in this case. 

^ • ^ 

Catherine M. Lang 

Acting Associate A' 

for Airports 

istrator 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on TDQLM . /J , (SOOf I placed in the United 

States mail (first class, postage paid) ^^iie copy of the foregoing document addressed to: 

Peter J. Kirsch 

David I. Spector 

KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL, LLP 

1675 Broadway, Suite 2300 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

Richard Cashman 

James Wenzel 

County of Westchester 

18 Martine Avenue, Room 600 

White Plains, New York, 10601 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

Almaria Gaston for 

Airport Compliance and Field Operations
InstantEye MK-2 GEN 3 sUAS

Description.

InstantEye Mk-2 is a low cost, man portable (<1 lb), autonomous, all electric hovering small unmanned aerial 

system (sUAS) designed to be deployed rapidly to conduct local (<1000 m or LOS) short term (30 min) situational 

awareness. The system is capable of flying in inclement weather including winds up to 30 mph, heavy rain/snow, 

altitudes up to 12,000 ft above mean sea level (MSL), and temperatures between -10 and 115 °F. The Aircraft is 

operated by one wireless control station that provides instrumentation data of the aircraft and first person video 

(FV).

Aircraft
# C_2018161EN.01006301.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/63

---

Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Kanyama v Council

(Case T-167/18)

(2018/C 161/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 4 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 4 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-163/18, Amisi Kumba v Council.

Amisi Kumba

Council

---