Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 88141 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

4Through its FIDS business (previously ICE Data 

Services), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ICE’’) 

operates the MDC. The Exchange is an indirect 

subsidiary of ICE and is an affiliate of the New York 

Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE 

Arca, Inc., and NYSE National, Inc. (together, the 

‘‘Affiliate SROs’’). Each Affiliate SRO has submitted 

substantially the same proposed rule change. See 

SR–NYSE–2023–48, SR–NYSEAMER–2023–65, SR– 

NYSEARCA–2023–83, and SR–NYSENAT–2023– 

29. 5 In addition to wired fiber optic connections, 

Users may use FIDS or third-party wireless 

connections to the MDC. In such a case, the portion 

of the connection closest to the MDC is wired. 

Other than Telecoms, Users are the only FIDS 

customers with equipment physically located in the 

MDC. 

6 In this filing, telecommunication service 

providers that choose to provide circuits at the 

MDC are referred to as ‘‘Telecoms.’’ Telecoms are 

licensed by the Federal Communications 

Commission (‘‘FCC’’) and are not required to be, or 

be affiliated with, a member of the Exchange or an 

Affiliate SRO. 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 144 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: December 13, 2023; Filing 

Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 

3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 

3035.105; Public Representative: 

Christopher C. Mohr; Comments Due: 

December 21, 2023. 

This Notice will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Erica A. Barker, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–27891 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–99167; File No. SR– 

NYSECHX–2023–24] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 

Chicago, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 

Rule Change To Amend the 

Connectivity Fee Schedule 

December 14, 2023. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3

notice is hereby given that, on 

November 30, 2023, the NYSE Chicago, 

Inc. (‘‘NYSE Chicago’’ or the 

‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (the 

‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I and II 

below, which Items have been prepared 

by the self-regulatory organization. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend the 

Connectivity Fee Schedule (the ‘‘Fee 

Schedule’’) to add circuits provided by 

Fixed Income and Data Services 

(‘‘FIDS’’) for connectivity into and out of 

the data center in Mahwah, New Jersey 

(the ‘‘MDC’’). The proposed rule change 

is available on the Exchange’s website at 

www.nyse.com, at the principal office of 

the Exchange, and at the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to amend the 

Connectivity Fee Schedule (the ‘‘Fee 

Schedule’’) to add circuits provided by 

Fixed Income and Data Services 

(‘‘FIDS’’) 4 for connectivity into and out 

of the data center in Mahwah, New 

Jersey (the ‘‘MDC’’). 

As background, market participants 

that request to receive colocation 

services directly from the Exchange 

(‘‘Users’’) require wired circuits 5 to 

connect into and out of the MDC. A 

User’s equipment in the MDC’s 

colocation hall connects to a circuit 

leading out of the MDC, which connects 

to the User’s equipment in their back 

office or another data center. 

Before 2013, all such circuits were 

provided by ICE’s predecessor, NYSE 

Euronext. In response to customer 

demand for more connectivity options, 

in 2013, the MDC opened two ‘‘meetme-rooms’’ to telecommunications 

service providers (‘‘Telecoms’’),6 to 

enable Telecoms to offer circuits into 

the MDC in competition with NYSE 

Euronext. Currently, 16 Telecoms 

operate in the meet-me-rooms and 

provide circuit options to Users 

requiring connectivity into and out of 

the MDC. As of June 1, 2023, more than 

95% of the circuits for which Users 

contracted were supplied by Telecoms, 

and all but two of the Users that used 

FIDS circuits as of that date also 

connected to Telecom circuits in the 

MMRs. 

The Exchange proposes to add several 

circuits provided by FIDS to the Fee 

Schedule. Specifically, the Exchange 

proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to 

add two different types of FIDS circuits, 

each available in three different sizes. 

Because FIDS is not a 

telecommunications provider, FIDS 

would purchase circuits from 

telecommunications providers, with 

portions allocated and sold to Users. 

First, the Exchange proposes to 

amend the Fee Schedule to add ‘‘Optic 

Access’’ circuits supplied by FIDS. 

Users can use an Optic Access circuit to 

connect between the MDC and the FIDS 

access centers at the following five 

third-party owned data centers: (1) 111 

Eighth Avenue, New York, NY; (2) 32 

Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY; 

(3) 165 Halsey, Newark, NJ; (4) 

Secaucus, NJ (the ‘‘Secaucus Access 

Center’’); and (5) Carteret, NJ (the 

‘‘Carteret Access Center’’). Optic Access 

circuits are available in 1 Gb, 10 Gb, and 

40 Gb sizes. 

Second, the Exchange proposes to 

amend the Fee Schedule to add lowerlatency ‘‘Optic Low Latency’’ circuits 

supplied by FIDS that Users can use to 

connect between the MDC and FIDS’s 

Secaucus Access Center or Carteret 

Access Center. Optic Low Latency 

circuits are available in 1 Gb, 10 Gb, and 

40 Gb sizes. 

The Exchange proposes to add the 

following chart to the Fee Schedule, 

under the new heading ‘‘E. FIDS 

Circuits’’: 

Type of service Fees 

Optic Access Circuit—1 Gb ...................................................................... $1,500 initial charge plus $650 monthly charge. 

Optic Access Circuit—10 Gb .................................................................... $5,000 initial charge plus $1,900 monthly charge. 

Optic Access Circuit—40 Gb .................................................................... $5,000 initial charge plus $4,000 monthly charge. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
88142 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 

7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

10Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90209 

(October 15, 2020), 85 FR 67044, 67049 (October 21, 

2020) (Order Granting Accelerated Approval to 

Establish a Wireless Fee Schedule Setting Forth 

Available Wireless Bandwidth Connections and 

Wireless Market Data Connections) (SR–NYSE– 

2020–05, SR–NYSEAMER–2020–05, SR– 

NYSEArca–2020–08, SR–NYSECHX–2020–02, SR– 

NYSENAT–2020–03, SR–NYSE–2020–11, SR– 

NYSEAMER–2020–10, SR–NYSEArca–2020–15, 

SR–NYSECHX–2020–05, SR–NYSENAT–2020–08) 

(‘‘Wireless Approval Order’’), citing Securities 

Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 

2008), 73 FR 74770, 74781 (December 9, 2008) 

(‘‘2008 ArcaBook Approval Order’’). See 

NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010). 

11Wireless Approval Order, supra note 10, at 

67049, citing 2008 ArcaBook Approval Order, supra 

note 10, at 74781. 

12See 2008 ArcaBook Approval Order, supra note 

10, at 74789 and note 295 (recognizing that 

products need not be identical to be substitutable). 

Type of service Fees 

Optic Low Latency Circuit—1 Gb ............................................................. $1,500 initial charge plus $2,750 monthly charge. 

Optic Low Latency Circuit—10 Gb ........................................................... $5,000 initial charge plus $3,950 monthly charge. 

Optic Low Latency Circuit—40 Gb ........................................................... $5,000 initial charge plus $8,250 monthly charge. 

Application and Impact of the Proposed 

Changes 

The proposed change is not targeted 

at, or expected to be limited in 

applicability to, a specific segment of 

market participant. The FIDS circuits 

would be available for purchase for any 

potential User requiring a circuit 

between the MDC and the FIDS access 

centers at the third-party owned data 

centers listed above. The proposed 

changes do not apply differently to 

distinct types or sizes of customers. 

Rather, they apply to all customers 

equally. 

Use of the services proposed in this 

filing are completely voluntary and 

available to all market participants on a 

non-discriminatory basis. 

The proposed changes are not 

otherwise intended to address any other 

issues relating to services related to the 

MDC and/or related fees, and the 

Exchange is not aware of any problems 

that market participants would have in 

complying with the proposed change. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and 

furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 

of the Act,8 in particular, because it is 

designed to prevent fraudulent and 

manipulative acts and practices, to 

promote just and equitable principles of 

trade, to foster cooperation and 

coordination with persons engaged in 

regulating, clearing, settling, processing 

information with respect to, and 

facilitating transactions in securities, to 

remove impediments to and perfect the 

mechanism of a free and open market 

and a national market system, and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest and because it is not 

designed to permit unfair 

discrimination between customers, 

issuers, brokers, or dealers. The 

Exchange further believes that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,9 because it 

provides for the equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 

among its members and issuers and 

other persons using its facilities and 

does not unfairly discriminate between 

customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. 

The Proposed Change Is Reasonable 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed rule change is reasonable. In 

considering the reasonableness of 

proposed services and fees, the 

Commission’s market-based test 

considers ‘‘whether the exchange was 

subject to significant competitive forces 

in setting the terms of its proposal 

. . . , including the level of any 

fees.’’ 10 If the Exchange meets that 

burden, ‘‘the Commission will find that 

its proposal is consistent with the Act 

unless ‘there is a substantial 

countervailing basis to find that the 

terms’ of the proposal violate the Act or 

the rules thereunder.’’ 11 Here, the 

Exchange is subject to significant 

competitive forces in setting the terms 

on which it offers its proposal, in 

particular because substantially similar 

substitutes are available, and the thirdparty vendors are not at a competitive 

disadvantage created by the Exchange. 

The proposed FIDS circuits would 

compete with circuits currently offered 

by the 16 Telecoms operating in the 

meet-me-rooms at the MDC. The 

Telecom circuits are reasonable 

substitutes for the FIDS circuits. The 

Commission has recognized that 

products do not need to be identical or 

equivalent to be considered 

substitutable; it is sufficient that they be 

substantially similar.12 The circuits 

provided by FIDS and by the Telecoms 

all perform the same function: 

connecting into and out of the MDC. 

The providers of these circuits design 

them to perform with particular 

combinations of latency, bandwidth, 

price, termination point, and other 

factors that they believe will attract 

Users, and Users choose from among 

these competing services on the basis of 

their business needs. 

The proposed FIDS circuits are 

sufficiently similar substitutes to the 

circuits offered by the 16 Telecoms even 

though the proposed FIDS circuits 

would all terminate in one of the five 

data centers mentioned above, while 

circuits from the 16 Telecoms could 

terminate in those locations or 

additional locations. While neither the 

Exchange nor FIDS knows the end point 

of any particular Telecom circuit, the 

Exchange understands that the 

Telecoms can offer circuits terminating 

in any location, including the five data 

center locations where the FIDS circuits 

would terminate. In addition, Users can 

choose to configure their pathway 

leading out of colocation in the way that 

best suits their business needs, which 

may include connecting to the User’s 

equipment at one of the five data center 

locations that serve as termination 

points for the proposed FIDS circuits, or 

connecting first to one of those five data 

centers with a FIDS- or Telecomsupplied circuit and then further 

connecting to another remote location 

using a telecommunication providersupplied circuit. 

The proposed FIDS circuits do not 

have a distance or latency advantage 

over the Telecoms’ circuits within the 

MDC. FIDS has normalized (a) the 

distance between the meet-me-rooms 

and the colocation halls and (b) the 

distance between the rooms where the 

FIDS circuits are located and the 

colocation halls. As a result, a User 

choosing whether to use the proposed 

FIDS circuits or Telecom circuits does 

not face any difference in the distances 

or latency within the MDC. 

The Exchange also believes that the 

proposed FIDS circuits do not have any 

latency or bandwidth advantage over 

the Telecoms’ circuits as a whole 

outside of the MDC. FIDS would 

purchase the proposed FIDS circuits 

from third-party telecommunications 

providers and would allocate and resell 

portions of them to Users. The Exchange 

believes that the Telecoms operating in 

the meet-me-rooms offer circuits with a 

variety of latency and bandwidth 

specifications, some of which may 

exceed the specifications of the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 88143 

13The specifications of FIDS’s competitors’ 

circuits are not publicly known. The Exchange 

understands that FIDS has gleaned any information 

it has about its competitors through anecdotal 

communications, by observing customers’ 

purchasing choices in the competitive market, and 

from its own experience as a purchaser of circuits 

from telecommunications providers to build FIDS’s 

own networks. 

14The fact that the FIDS circuits do not have an 

advantage is reflected by the fact that Users choose 

to use Telecom circuits for the vast majority of their 

circuit needs. Whereas before 2013, NYSE Euronext 

provided 100% of such circuits, today more than 

95% of the circuits that Users have contracted for 

are supplied by third-party Telecoms, with FIDS 

supplying less than 5%. 

15See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98001 

(July 26, 2023), 88 FR 50196 (August 1, 2023) (SR– 

NYSECHX–2023–14) (‘‘MMR Notice’’). 

16 ‘‘Hosting’’ is a service offered by a User to 

another entity in the User’s space within the MDC. 

The Exchange allows Users to act as Hosting Users 

for a monthly fee. See Securities Exchange Act 

Release No. 87408 (October 28, 2019), 84 FR 58778 

(November 1, 2019) (SR–NYSECHX–2019–12). 

Hosting Users’ customers are referred to as ‘‘Hosted 

Customers.’’ 

17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 

18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 

19 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

proposed FIDS circuits.13 The Exchange 

believes that Users consider these 

latency and bandwidth factors—as well 

as other factors, such as price and 

termination point—in determining 

which circuit offerings will best serve 

their business needs.14

In sum, the Exchange does not believe 

that there is anything about the 

proposed FIDS circuits that would make 

the Telecoms’ circuits inadequate 

substitutes. 

Nor does the Exchange have a 

meaningful competitive advantage over 

the Telecoms by virtue of the fact that 

it owns and operates the MDC’s meetme-rooms. The Exchange understands 

that Telecoms choose to pay fees to the 

Exchange for the opportunity to install 

equipment in the MDC’s meet-me-rooms 

because of the financial benefits those 

Telecoms can accrue by selling circuits 

to Users. It is therefore in the 

Exchange’s best interest to set fees at the 

MDC—including both the meet-meroom fees that Telecoms pay and the 

FIDS circuit fees that Users would pay— 

at a level that encourages market 

participants, including Telecoms, to 

maximize their use of the MDC.15

Setting the FIDS circuit fees at a 

reasonable level makes it more likely 

that Users will connect into and out of 

the MDC. Competitive rates for circuits, 

whether FIDS circuits or Telecom 

circuits, help draw more Users and 

Hosted Customers 16 into the MDC, 

which directly benefits the Exchange by 

increasing the customer base to whom 

the Exchange can sell its colocation 

services (including cabinets, power, 

ports, and connectivity to many thirdparty data feeds) and encouraging 

greater participation on the Exchange. In 

other words, by setting the fees for FIDS 

circuits at a level attractive to Users, the 

Exchange spurs demand for all of the 

services it sells at the MDC. 

If the Exchange were to set the price 

of the FIDS circuits too high, Users 

would likely respond by choosing one 

of the many alternative options offered 

by the 16 Telecoms. Conversely, if the 

Exchange were to offer the FIDS circuits 

at prices aimed at undercutting 

comparable Telecom circuits, the 

Telecoms might reassess whether it 

makes financial sense for them to 

continue to participate in the MDC’s 

meet-me-rooms. Their departure might 

negatively impact User participation in 

colocation and on the Exchange. As a 

result, the Exchange is not motivated to 

undercut the prices of Telecom circuits. 

For these reasons, the proposed 

change is reasonable. 

The Proposed Change Is an Equitable 

Allocation of Fees and Credits 

The Exchange believes that its 

proposal equitably allocates its fees 

among market participants. The 

Exchange believes that the proposed 

change is equitable because it would not 

apply differently to distinct types or 

sizes of market participants. Rather, it 

would apply to all market participants 

equally. 

In addition, the Exchange believes 

that the proposal is equitable because 

only market participants that 

voluntarily select to receive the 

proposed FIDS circuits would be 

charged for them. The proposed FIDS 

circuits are available to all market 

participants on an equal basis, and all 

market participants that voluntarily 

choose to purchase a FIDS circuit are 

charged the same amount for that circuit 

as all other market participants 

purchasing that type of FIDS circuit. 

Moreover, any telecommunications 

service provider licensed by the FCC is 

eligible to be a Telecom operating in the 

MRR, irrespective of size and type. The 

Exchange’s MMR services are available 

to all Telecoms on an equal basis at 

standardized pricing. 

The Proposed Change Is Not Unfairly 

Discriminatory 

The Exchange believes its proposal is 

not unfairly discriminatory. The 

proposed change does not apply 

differently to distinct types or sizes of 

market participants. Rather, it applies to 

all market participants equally. The 

purchase of any proposed service is 

completely voluntary and the Fee 

Schedule will be applied uniformly to 

all market participants. 

In addition, the Exchange believes 

that the proposal is not unfairly 

discriminatory because only market 

participants that voluntarily select to 

receive the proposed FIDS circuits 

would be charged for them. The 

proposed FIDS circuits are available to 

all market participants on an equal 

basis, and all market participants that 

voluntarily choose to purchase a FIDS 

circuit are charged the same amount for 

that circuit as all other market 

participants purchasing that type of 

FIDS circuit. 

For these reasons, the Exchange 

believes that the proposal is consistent 

with the Act. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange believes that the 

proposal will not impose any burden on 

competition that is not necessary or 

appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of Section 6(b)(8) of the Act.17

The proposed change would not 

impose a burden on competition among 

national securities exchanges or among 

members of the Exchange. The proposed 

change would enhance competition in 

the market for circuits transmitting data 

into and out of colocation at the MDC 

by adding FIDS as the 17th provider of 

such circuits, in addition to the 16 

Telecoms that also sell such circuits to 

Users. The proposed FIDS circuits do 

not have any latency, bandwidth, or 

other advantage over the Telecoms’ 

circuits. The proposal would not burden 

competition in the sale of such circuits, 

but rather, enhance it by providing 

Users with an additional choice for their 

circuit needs. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The Exchange has filed the proposed 

rule change pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 18 and Rule 

19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.19 Because the 

proposed rule change does not: (i) 

significantly affect the protection of 

investors or the public interest; (ii) 

impose any significant burden on 

competition; and (iii) become operative 

prior to 30 days from the date on which 

it was filed, or such shorter time as the 

Commission may designate, if 

consistent with the protection of 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
88144 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 

20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 

21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

5See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98917 

(November 13, 2023), 88 FR 80361 (November 17, 

2023) (SR–MIAX–2023–36) (Order Approving a 

Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 

404, Series of Option Contracts Open for Trading). 

6See Rule 19.6, Interpretation and Policy .03(a). 

investors and the public interest, the 

proposed rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 

of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 

thereunder. 

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of such proposed rule change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. If the 

Commission takes such action, the 

Commission shall institute proceedings 

under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 20 of the Act to 

determine whether the proposed rule 

change should be approved or 

disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include file number SR– 

NYSECHX–2023–24 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to file 

number SR–NYSECHX–2023–24. This 

file number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 

will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of the 

Exchange. Do not include personal 

identifiable information in submissions; 

you should submit only information 

that you wish to make available 

publicly. We may redact in part or 

withhold entirely from publication 

submitted material that is obscene or 

subject to copyright protection. All 

submissions should refer to file number 

SR–NYSECHX–2023–24 and should be 

submitted on or before January 10, 2024. 

For the Commission, by the Division 

of Trading and Markets, pursuant to 

delegated authority.21

Sherry R. Haywood, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–27910 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–99174; File No. SR– 

CboeEDGX–2023–076] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe 

EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing 

and Immediate Effectiveness of a 

Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a 

Low Priced Stock Strike Price Interval 

Program 

December 14, 2023. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on December 

7, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. 

(‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I and II 

below, which Items have been prepared 

by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the 

proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ 

proposed rule change pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and 

Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the 

‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX Options’’) 

proposes to adopt a Low Priced Stock 

Strike Price Interval Program. The text 

of the proposed rule change is provided 

in Exhibit 5. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is also available on the Exchange’s 

website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/ 

options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), 

at the Exchange’s Office of the 

Secretary, and at the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

Exchange has prepared summaries, set 

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of 

the most significant aspects of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Rule 19.6. Miami International 

Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX’’) 

recently received approval to amend its 

Rule 404 to implement a new strike 

interval program for stocks that are 

priced less than $2.50 and have an 

average daily trading volume of at least 

1,000,000 shares per day for the 3 

preceding calendar months.5 At this 

time, the Exchange proposes to adopt 

rules substantively identical to MIAX in 

proposed Rule 19.6, Interpretation and 

Policy .08 and amend Rule 19.6, 

Interpretation and Policy .05(f) to 

harmonize the table within that Rule to 

the proposed rule text. 

Currently, Rule 19.6 describes the 

process and procedures for listing and 

trading series of options on the 

Exchange. Rule 19.6 provides for a $2.50 

Strike Price Program, where the 

Exchange may select up to 200 option 

classes on individual stocks for which 

the interval of strike prices will be $2.50 

where the strike price is greater than 

$25 but less than $50.6 Rule 19.6, 

Interpretation and Policy .02 also 

provides for a $1 Strike Price Program, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1