alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         The  following  are direct or  indirect  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  of
Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc.:

         CRIT-NC,  LLC (a Virginia limited liability company)
         CRIT-SC,  LLC (a Virginia  limited  liability company)
         CRIT-SC,  Inc.(a Virginia corporation)
         CRIT-Cornerstone Limited Partnership (a Virginia limited partnership)

         In addition, Cornerstone  Realty Income Trust, Inc. owns 99.99% of  the
 following company:

         Cornerstone Acquisition Company (a Virginia corporation)


         The  following  are direct or  indirect  wholly-owned  subsidiaries  of
Cornerstone Acquisition Company:

         Apple General, Inc. (a Virginia corporation)
         Apple Limited, Inc. (a Virginia corporation)
         Apple REIT Limited  Partnership (a Virginia limited  partnership)
         Apple REIT II Limited Partnership (a Virginia limited partnership)
         Apple REIT III Limited Partnership (a Virginia limited  partnership)
         Apple REIT IV Limited  Partnership  (a  Virginia  limited  partnership)
         Apple REIT V Limited  Partnership  (a Virginia  limited  partnership)
         Apple REIT VI Limited  Partnership (a Virginia  limited  partnership)
         Apple REIT VII Limited Partnership (a Virginia limited partnership)
# C_2021189EN.01000301.xml

| 17.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v MI (C-870/19), TB (C-871/19)

(Joined Cases C-870/19 and C-871/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Recording equipment in road transport - Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 - Article 15(7) - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Control proceedings - Administrative penalty - Failure to produce the record sheets for the tachograph relating to the current day and the previous 28 days - Single or multiple infringement)

(2021/C 189/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze

Defendants: MI (C-870/19), TB (C-871/19)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(7) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 and Article 19 of Regulation No 561/2006 must be interpreted as meaning that, should the driver of a road transport vehicle subject to an inspection fail to produce the record sheets of the recording equipment relating to several days of activity during the period covering the day of the inspection and the previous 28 days, the competent authorities of the Member State where the inspection was carried out must make a finding of a single infringement by that driver and impose on him or her only a single penalty for that infringement.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
# C_2019263EN.01004401.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2019 — De Esteban Alonso v Commission

(Case T-138/18) (1)

(Civil Service - Former officials - OLAF investigation - ‘Eurostat’ case - Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information relating to matters liable to result in criminal proceedings - Failure to notify potentially concerned officials beforehand - Harm allegedly suffered on account of the conduct of OLAF and the Commission during the proceedings - Material, non-material and physical harm - Causal link)

(2019/C 263/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fernando De Esteban Alonso (Saint-Martin-de-Seignanx, France) (represented by: C. Huglo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Striani and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for compensation for the material, non-material and physical harm which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Fernando De Esteban Alonso EUR 62 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Fernando De Esteban Alonso EUR 62 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr De Esteban Alonso. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr De Esteban Alonso.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
of Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. Mark Young,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                                   By: /s/ A. Mark Young
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       A. Mark Young
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       June 7, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4254 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4254

 To amend the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 to 
strengthen the aerospace workforce pipeline by the promotion of Robert 
 Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and National Aeronautics and Space 
 Administration internship and fellowship opportunities to women, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2017

Mr. Knight (for himself, Ms. Esty of Connecticut, Ms. Kaptur, and Mrs. 
  Comstock) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 to 
strengthen the aerospace workforce pipeline by the promotion of Robert 
 Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and National Aeronautics and Space 
 Administration internship and fellowship opportunities to women, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women in Aerospace Education Act''.

SEC. 2. ROBERT NOYCE TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FELLOWSHIP 
              OPPORTUNITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 10 of the National Science Foundation 
Authorization Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 1862n-1) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(m) Fellowship Placements in National Laboratories and NASA 
Centers.--The Director of the National Science Foundation shall 
encourage eligible entities administering a fellowship program using 
funds awarded under this section to include in such program 
opportunities for the placement of fellows in research or education 
internship opportunities at national laboratories and NASA centers. The 
Director may give priority to proposals for such placements that 
provide female fellows with research experience in aerospace 
engineering and related fields in which women are underrepresented.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to grants awarded on or after October 1, 2018.

SEC. 3. NASA INTERNSHIP AND FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES.

    Not later than October 1, 2018, the Administrator of the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration (in this section referred to as 
``NASA'') shall institute a process to prioritize the promotion and 
recruitment of qualified candidates who are women or individuals who 
are historically underrepresented in the fields of science, technology, 
engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and computer science for 
internships and fellowships at NASA with relevance to the aerospace 
sector and related fields.
                                 <all>
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07168 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 07168\07168_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07168\07168_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07168\07168_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07168\07168_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07168\07168_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07168\07168_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07168\Certification Statement Plant ID 07168.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 07168\Supplemental Documents\07168_Map-1 Rupert.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07168\Supplemental Documents\07168_WB-1 Rupert.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 698 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 698

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the 
Committee on Appropriations to maintain proposed and historical budget 
          authority and outlays for each category of spending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2016

Mr. Brat (for himself, Mr. Amash, Mr. Jones, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. 
 Ribble, and Mr. Babin) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the 
Committee on Appropriations to maintain proposed and historical budget 
          authority and outlays for each category of spending.

    Resolved, That (a) clause 4(a) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
    ``(5)(A) The Committee on Appropriations shall maintain proposed 
and historical budget authority and outlays for each category of 
spending. Such data shall--
            ``(i) cover a period comprising the 10 fiscal years 
        immediately preceding the budget year; and
            ``(ii) be kept up-to-date and provided on the public Web 
        site of the committee in a downloadable, searchable, and 
        sortable format.
    ``(B) As used in this subparagraph, the term `category of spending' 
includes--
            ``(i) section 302(a) allocations and section 302(b) 
        suballocations and discretionary and direct spending authority 
        for each department, agency, program, or other line item in any 
        appropriation Act; and
            ``(ii) discretionary and direct spending authority for each 
        department, agency, and program as set forth in budget 
        proposals of the Presidents submitted under section 1105(a) of 
        title 31, United States Code.''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect 
immediately before noon on January 3, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008285EN.01001501.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/15

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Panevėžio apygardos teismas — Republic of Lithuania) — Criminal proceedings against Edgar Babanov

(Case C-207/08) (1)

1

(First paragraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Agriculture - Free movement of goods - National legislation prohibiting the cultivation of any type of hemp)

(2008/C 285/24)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Panevėžio apygardos teismas

Criminal proceedings against

Edgar Babanov

Action

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Panevėžio apygardos teismas — Compatibility with the law of the European Union of national legislation providing for criminal liability for cultivating any type of hemp — Power of a court to apply national legislation when the hemp content of active substances does not exceed a certain threshold

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation which has the effect of prohibiting the cultivation and possession of hemp grown for fibre covered by that regulation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation which has the effect of prohibiting the cultivation and possession of hemp grown for fibre covered by that regulation.

| 2. | Community law precludes the court of a Member State from applying national legislation which, contrary to Regulation No 1782/2003, has the effect of prohibiting the cultivation and possession of hemp grown for fibre covered by that regulation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Community law precludes the court of a Member State from applying national legislation which, contrary to Regulation No 1782/2003, has the effect of prohibiting the cultivation and possession of hemp grown for fibre covered by that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 209 of 15.8.2008.

1

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

STEVEN FRANCIS REYCHLER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-30225 

D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00004-DLC-3 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Steven Francis Reychler appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United 

States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-30225 

Reychler contends that he is entitled to compassionate release and the 

district court failed to explain its decision to deny relief. The record reflects that 

the district court considered Reychler’s arguments and adequately explained that, 

though Reychler’s age and certain medical issues constituted an extraordinary and 

compelling reason for his release, release was unwarranted in light of the 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) factors, including the seriousness of the offense conduct, the downward 

variance imposed at sentencing, and the needs to reflect the seriousness of the 

offense and promote respect for the law. See Chavez-Meza v. United States, 138 S. 

Ct. 1959, 1965 (2018). The court’s decision to deny relief was not an abuse of 

discretion. See Keller, 2 F.4th at 1284; United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 

1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is 

illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record).

AFFIRMED.
#### State v. Chrisman

16237

1/09/95

Reversed
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

January 12, 2024

CR-2022-0957

James Leon Smith v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Wilcox Circuit Court: CC-16-

29) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on January 12, 2024, the following action was 

taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5479]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      RECOGNIZING CHARLIE ROLLINO

 Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I would like to take the 
opportunity to express my appreciation to Charlie Rollino for his hard 
work as an intern for the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee. I 
recognize his efforts and contributions to my office.
  Charlie is from Lander, WY and a graduate of Mother of Divine Grace 
High School. He is a student at Christendom College where he is 
majoring in History and Political Science. He has demonstrated a strong 
work ethic, which has made him an invaluable asset to the U.S. Senate 
Republican Policy Committee. The quality of his work is reflected in 
his great efforts over the last several months.
  I thank Charlie for the dedication he has shown while working for me 
and my staff. It was a pleasure to have him as part of our team. I know 
he will have continued success with all of his future endeavors. I wish 
him all my best on his next journey.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2020414EN.01002602.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — E. Sp. z o.o v K.S.

(Case C-904/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/40)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5803]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, the majority leader filed cloture on 
the cyber security bill today. As a result, the filing deadline for 
first-degree amendments to S. 3414 is 1 p.m. on Wednesday.
  I want to indicate to my colleagues that we continue to work on an 
agreement on amendments to the bill which I hope we can reach. If no 
agreement is reached, the cloture vote will be on Thursday.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2018094EN.01003102.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/31

---

Action brought on 19 January 2018 — Nova Brands v EUIPO — Natamil (Natamil)

(Case T-23/18)

(2018/C 094/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nova Brands SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: V. Wellens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Natamil GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘natamil’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1 235 069

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2017 in Case R 1910/2016-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU concerning the obligation to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU concerning the obligation to state reasons.

---