alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

                          Independent Auditors' Report




The Board of Directors and Stockholder
TSX Corporation:

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows of TSX Corporation and Subsidiary for the
twelve-month period ended the last Saturday of October 1996 (not presented
herein). Those consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on those
consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
TSX Corporation and subsidiary for the twelve-month period ended the last
Saturday of October 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

                                                           /s/  KPMG LLP

El Paso, Texas
May 30, 1997
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-1308]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Kinetochem LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before February 16, 2024. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before February 16, 2024.
 ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov.*
                         If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on November 28, 2023, Kinetochem LLC, 96 Market Street, Suite 102, Georgetown, Texas 78626-3618, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
ScheduleMarihuana
7360
ITetrahyrocannabinols
7370
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients to its customers as well as for research and clinical trials. In reference to drug codes 7360 
                    ( print page 87459)
                    (Marihuana), and 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols) the company plans to bulk manufacture these drug codes as synthetic. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Claude Redd, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-27708 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                           2,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,348
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               59
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,348
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (65)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     85
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 85
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        85
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010100EN.01000501.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), CMS Hasche Sigle

(Case C-408/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Articles 55(1)(a) and 7(1)(c) - Interest in bringing an application for a declaration of invalidity of a trade mark based on an absolute ground for invalidity - Law firm - Word sign ‘COLOR EDITION’ - Descriptive character of a word mark composed of descriptive elements)

2010/C 100/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral), CMS Hasche Sigle

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2008 in Case T-160/07 Lancôme v OHIM — CMS Hasche Sigle in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the appellant against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2007 declaring invalid the registration of the trade mark COLOR EDITION in respect of cosmetic and make-up goods — Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c) and 55(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) — Legal standing to bring an application for a declaration of a trade mark’s invalidity — Law firm — No private economic interest to apply for a declaration of the invalidity of a cosmetics trade mark — Noticeable difference between the association created by the terms suggested for the purpose of a trade mark’s registration and the everyday language used by the target public to describe the goods and services at issue or their essential characteristics

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.

1

---
# C_2008171EN.01001602.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 15 April 2008 — Real Sociedad de Fútbol SAD and Nihat Kahveci v Consejo Superior de Deportes and Real Federación Española de Fútbol

(Case C-152/08)

(2008/C 171/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Real Sociedad de Fútbol SAD and Nihat Kahveci

Applicants:

Defendants: Consejo Superior de Deportes and Real Federación Española de Fútbol

Defendants:

Question referred

Does Article 37 of the EEC-Turkey Association Agreement (1), signed in Ankara on 12 September 1963 and approved by Council Decision 64/732/EEC, and its Additional Protocol of 23 November 1970 (2), preclude a sporting federation from applying a rule to a professional sportsman of Turkish nationality, lawfully employed by a Spanish football club, as in the main proceedings, under which clubs may use only a limited number of players from non-member States not belonging to the European Economic Area in national competitions?

1

2

---

(1)  Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed on 12 September 1963 in Ankara, and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963 (OJ 1964 217, p. 3685).

1

(2)  Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 in Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 of 19 December 1972 (OJ L 293, p. 1).

2

---
# C_2008285EN.01001601.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/16

---

Action brought on 18 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-333/08)

(2008/C 285/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by providing, in respect of technological adjuvants and foodstuffs in the preparation of which were used technological adjuvants originating from other Member States where they were lawfully manufactured and/or placed on the market, for a scheme of prior authorisation which does not comply with the principle of proportionality, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by providing, in respect of technological adjuvants and foodstuffs in the preparation of which were used technological adjuvants originating from other Member States where they were lawfully manufactured and/or placed on the market, for a scheme of prior authorisation which does not comply with the principle of proportionality, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC;

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action, the Commission complains of the restrictions on trade resulting from the French legislation relating to technological adjuvants. By introducing a system of prior authorisation for those products and for foodstuffs in the preparation of which were used technological adjuvants originating from other Member States where they were lawfully manufactured and/or placed on the market, that legislation makes the marketing of those foodstuffs and adjuvants more onerous and costly, thereby hindering intra-Community trade.

According to the Commission, a scheme of prior authorisation may, in certain circumstances, be justified on grounds of public health, but such a scheme would, in any event, have to satisfy the criterion of proportionality and comply with the conditions laid down in the case-law, including those set out in Case C-24/00 Commission v France [2004] ECR I-1277. In the present case, a number of those conditions are not satisfied, as the procedures provided for by that legislation are not easily accessible, expeditious and susceptible to challenge by way of legal proceedings in the event of authorisation being refused.

Commission

France

---
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian company (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 28, 2007 |  | /s/ Kenneth A. Dean
|                     |  | Name:               |  | Kenneth A. Dean        
|                     |  | Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4362 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for priority in the award 

of State home facility grants to nursing homes and domiciliaries from 

States that the Secretary determines have a great or significant need 

for beds and which are located at least 100 miles away from the nearest 

existing State home facility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. O’HALLERAN (for himself, Mr. GALLEGO, and Ms. SINEMA) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for priority in the award of State home facility grants to nursing homes and domiciliaries from States that the Secretary determines have a great or significant need for 

beds and which are located at least 100 miles away 

from the nearest existing State home facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for Rural 

5 Veterans Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4362 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PRIORITY 

2 FOR STATE HOME FACILITY GRANTS. 

3 Section 8135(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) 

6 through (H) as subparagraphs (E) through (I), re7 spectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol9 lowing new subparagraph (D): 

10 ‘‘(D) An application for construction or acquisi11 tion of a nursing home or domiciliary from a State 

12 that the Secretary determines, in accordance with 

13 regulations under this subchapter, has a great or 

14 significant need for beds and which is located at 

15 least 100 miles away from the nearest existing State 

16 home facility.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Jackson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), both rendered October 17,1987, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts; one count under each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and sentencing him to two concurrent indeterminate terms of three to nine years imprisonment, and directing him to make restitution in the amount of $1,535.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting the provision thereof directing the defendant to make restitution in the amount of $1,535; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for a hearing and new determination concerning the proper amount of restitution and the manner of payment thereof.

The plea proceedings and the presentence report were insufficient to enable the court to determine the proper amount of restitution and, therefore, a hearing is required *(see, People v Gudat,*155 AD2d 554; *People v Clougher,*95 AD2d 860). As was noted in *People v Clougher (supra,*at 860, quoting from *People v Fuller,*57 NY2d 152, 156): "While the [sentencing] court acted properly in employing the Probation Department as a preliminary fact finder to ascertain the appropriate amount of restitution * * ***the court should have conducted a hearing upon receipt of the Probation Department’s report. Moreover, defendant’s failure at the time of sentencing to request a hearing on the issue of restitution did not constitute a forfeiture of his right of review by this court, as the failure to accord him a hearing on that issue constituted a departure from 'the "essential nature of the right to be sentenced as provided by law” ’ ”. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1328-E1329]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 IN REMEMBRANCE OF WILLIAM A. SILVERMAN

                                  _____
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in remembrance of publicist, 
William A. Silverman.
  Born in Toledo, Ohio, Bill was the son of an editor at the Cleveland 
News. Upon graduating from Centre College of Kentucky and the 
University of Madrid, he wrote for the Army's Stars and Stripes 
publication during the Korean War. He also spent five years covering 
the police beat, and worked for several different public relations 
firms before opening his own firm, Silverman and Co.
  In the 1960s, Bill worked on the mayoral campaigns of Ralph Perk and 
Seth Taft; his work on Taft's campaign earned him a public relations 
position with Mayor Stokes and a grant from the nonprofit Greater 
Cleveland Associated Foundation. Soon after beginning work with Stokes, 
Silverman opened the Silverman and Co. public relations firm in 
downtown Cleveland, OH. Together with Stokes, he

[[Page E1329]]

helped pass a clean water bond issue, and created Cleveland: NOW!
  Throughout the years, Silverman and Co. grew and opened branches in 
Toledo, Columbus, and Charleston, West Virginia. By 1996, the PR firm 
was the third largest in the region and ranked 40th in the country. 
Throughout Silverman's career, some of his clients included Blue Cross; 
Don King; BBC Industries; Mayor George Voinovich; and Democratic 
Council President George Forbes. After more than 30 years in business, 
Bill retired and the firm closed in 1997 and 1998 respectively.
  I offer my condolences to his wife, Sandy; children, Alexander, Beth 
Ann, Frances, William, Jeffrey, and Jenny; and sixteen grandchildren.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the life and 
accomplishments of Mr. William A. Silverman.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1383-E1384]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             RECOGNITION OF THE RETIREMENT OF GARY BARRIGER

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. DAVID P. ROE

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. ROE of Tennessee. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Mr. Gary 
Barrigar, who is stepping down as president of the Boone Watershed 
Partnership, which he has served since 2005. Through both his work with 
the Partnership and as a schoolteacher, Gary has made incredible 
contributions to his East Tennessee community.
  As a science teacher who was in the classroom for 38 years at 
Elizabethton High School, Gary headed the award-winning Elizabethton 
High Ecology Club. He has also been an integral part of numerous 
organizations that protect the environment and outdoor areas that we 
East Tennesseeans hold so close to our hearts.
  Gary has made it his life's mission to increase water quality 
awareness and help preserve local rivers and streams--something

[[Page E1384]]

that all of us in East Tennessee are the better for.
  I commend Gary for his selfless contributions to East Tennessee and 
its water resources and wish him the best as he transitions into this 
new stage in life.

                          ____________________
```