alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
02/05/2015 10:23 4252271007 David Shayne 

### FAA Office ofRegional Counsel 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, Washington 98057 Telephone: 

### (425) 227-2!65 Facsimile: (

### 425) 227-1007 ANM7



## UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of: Joseph 

### D. Barbera

TO: Joseph 

### D. Barbera 

### FAA Case 

### No. 2013NM090056 

### FDMSD No. FAA 2013-1083 Judge

### Not Assigned 

### NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY PAGE 02/03

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Federal Aviation Administration by and through the undersigned counsel will be unavailable the following dates: February 

### 10, 201.5 through 

### March 1, 

### 2015. Respectfully submitted this 

### s'h day ofFebruary 2015. \D'!Witl' 

### F. Shayne

FAA Attorney

NOTICE OFUNA VAlUBIUTY J:'o.g¢ I of2 lJAVIr.> F. SHAYNE, FAA ATToRNEY TEL: (425) **227.,21.65~** FA.'\: (425) 227-100702/05/2015 10:23 4252271007 ANM7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I cenifythat the foregoing Notice ofUnavailability has been served as designated bythe recipient's name this date, to the following: Federal Aviation Administration-- Facsimile 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20591. Attn: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright **Building~** Suite 2Wl000 

### Fax: (202) 267-1293 Joseph D Barbera- First Class, ReturnReceipt Requested Mail 14706 NEErickson Dr. LaCenter, WA 98629-4405 Datedthis 

### S'h day ofFebruary 2015.



# T~~~ Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal. Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 (425) 227-2007 PAGE 03/03

NOTICE OFUNA 1':41LABILITF DAVID F. SHAYNE,FMATTORNEY Page2of2 TJ';L·. (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-l 00702/05/2015 10:23 4252271007 ANM7

FACSIMJLEMESSAGE FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OFREGIONAL COUNSEL ANM-7 1601 LIND AVENUE S.W. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 PAGE 01/03



### The information contained inthis facsimile message 

### is lega!lyprivileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use ofthe individual named on this cover sheet, 

### Ifthereader ofthis message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distdbution, or copy ofthis facsimile is strictly prohibited, Tfyou have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 425-227-2007 

### DATE: 

## TO: 

## FAX NO.: PHONE NO.: February 5, 2015 Docket 

## ClerkAGC-430 

## 202-267-1293 RE: Joseph D. FAA 2013-1083 Barbera 

## Notice ofUnavailability NO. PAGES: 

## 3including cover FROM: David 

## F. Shayne FAX NO.: 425-227-1007 PHONE NO.: 425-227-2165
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1612

FLORENCE NGUH NJWENG, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-695-737) Submitted: January 17, 2007 Decided: February 6, 2007 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOC., P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Carol Federighi, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Florence Nguh Njweng, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s decision finding her inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) for having falsely represented herself as a United States citizen for the purpose of receiving a benefit under law, and INA § 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I), for not being in possession of a valid, unexpired visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card or other valid entry document. Njweng contends she should have been given the opportunity to apply for adjustment of status. She further contends the evidence was insufficient and she was denied due process insofar as the Board found she was inadmissible for having falsely claimed to be a United States citizen. We deny the petition for review. Administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary. A decision that an alien is not admissible is conclusive unless manifestly contrary to law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(2000). The Board found Njweng was inadmissible for two independent reasons. Whether or not Njweng should have been permitted under amended regulations to apply for adjustment of status is irrelevant so long as she was inadmissible for having falsely claimed to be a United States citizen.- 3 - With respect to her due process challenge, we find she was provided with all the process she was due and, in any event, she failed to establish prejudice. Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 320-22 (4th Cir. 2002). We further find the record does not compel a different result and the Board’s decision is not manifestly contrary to the law. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

131) ll-E-91 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07AM Sheet 131 of 264 
P.2 

02/13/1997 15:47 3344520588 

W/13/t7 18: 3 1 WU199410234 

RUBBER S PLASTIC 

PES RTP NC 

PAGE 02 

II 002.7002 

A 94 52 

Contact Report 

Plastic Composite NESHAP 

I rom: 

late: 

( ontact: 

Company: 

Greg LaFlam. Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

November 12.1996 

Mr. William Wells, President 

Rubber & Plastic Applicators, Inc., Mobile, AL 

Telephone Number: (334)452-0585 

CL2 2' S 3 3 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Cfontact Summary: 

The company produces corrosion-resistant products (stacks, tanks, etc.) using filament 

winding and hand layup. Most of the resin mixing is done in 55-sallon drums, using two forms 

of covered mixing. In one type, a cover with a 2.5-inch hole (for the mixer shaft) is used. In the 

s xond type (used most often), a total cover with essentially complete sealing and no openings is 

used. The facility has the capacity to operate 4 to 6 mixers ax one time. 

IEPORT IS ACCURATE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0000908139
<NAME>                       Americo Life, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.0
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           925,997
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          852,908
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            821,335
<EQUITIES>                                     73,448
<MORTGAGE>                                     227,601
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  28,516
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 2,361,019
<CASH>                                         122,788
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             1,140,206
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         212,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,188,162
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                3,422,567
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            60,279
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 37,821
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          119,664
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                111,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,188,162
<PREMIUMS>                                     224,896
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            227,622
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             4,174
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 6,147
<BENEFITS>                                     261,342
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    73,643
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           86,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  11,474
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1,147.40
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

NICHOLAS ERMOLOVICH,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2975 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 63 DB 2023

Attorney Registration No. 73573

(Lancaster County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd d ay of June , 202 3

, having received no response to a

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Nicholas Ermolovich is placed on temporary

suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He shall comply

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to

request accelerated di sposition of charges underlying this order are specifically

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline. See Pa.R.D.E. 402(c)(3)

(providing an exception to the confidentiality requirement of Ru le 402 when “ an order of

temporary suspension from the practice of law is entered by the Court pursuant to

Enforcement Rule 208(f) ” ).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Hana
Biosciences, Inc. does hereby certify that to the best of his
knowledge:





(a) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hana Biosciences, Inc. for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Hana Biosciences,
Inc.





Dated:
      August 13, 2010
                /s/ Steven R. Deitcher,
  MDSteven
      R. Deitcher, MDPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      August 13, 2010
                /s/ Craig W. CarlsonCraig
      W. Carlson
                  Vice
      President, Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q (the "Report") of Amaru,
Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Colin Binny, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Colin Binny
------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
November  13, 2008
# C_2020077EN.01001001.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/10

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence — France) — execution of a European arrest warrant in respect of MN

(Case C-813/19 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Article 6(1) - Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ - Effective judicial protection)

(2020/C 77/13)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence

Parties to the main proceedings

MN

In the presence of: RJA, RJO, FD, BG, PG, KL, LK, MJ, NI, OH

Operative part of the order

Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’, for the purposes of that provision, covers French prosecutors, managed and supervised by their hierarchical superiors and under the authority of the Minister of Justice in accordance with the statutory rules and institutional framework to which they are subject, since their statute grants them a guarantee of independence, in particular vis-à-vis the executive, in the context of the issue of a European arrest warrant.

Framework Decision 2002/584 must be interpreted as meaning that the requirements inherent in effective judicial protection to be provided to a person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued with a view to criminal prosecution are satisfied where, in accordance with the legislation of the issuing Member State, the conditions for the issue of that warrant and, in particular, the proportionality thereof are subject to judicial review in that ember State.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 14, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 145 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-121, CP2024-127.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28060 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
18172

#### Correa & Son, Inc. v. Halawa Center

April 7, 1997

Order No. 97-29

Affirmed
22nd October 2013

Dr  David T Danielson

Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

US Department of Energy Mail Station EE‐1

1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

Dear Assistant Secretary Danielson,

Indesit Company International Business S.A. based in Lugano, Ticino 6928 Switzerland

hereby submits this Petition for Waiver and application for Interim Waiver, pursuant to

10 CFR 430.27, for its Ariston branded condenser tumble dryer models TCL 73 X NA

and TCL 73 XS NA.

Indesit Company is a European manufacturer of household appliances including

refrigeration, washing machines, cookers and dishwashers in addition to tumble dryers

. The company head office is in Italy and the tumble dryer manufacturing plant is in the

UK. In addition to tumble dryers Indesit Company also sells, washers, washerdryers,

hobs, ovens and hoods in the USA under the Ariston, Scholtes and Splendide brands.

This petition and application are based on the following major points:

1. Indesit’s petition is for condenser clothes dryer models TCL73XNA and

TCL73XSNA for sale in the USA during the remainder of 2013 and 2014.

2. The test procedures  outlined in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix D cannot

be applied to condensing type tumble dryers.

3. Waivers have previously been granted for similar products produced by other

manufacturers including  Bosch,  Miele  and ASKO.

4. The equivalent product on sale in Europe has been tested in accordance the

European energy labelling standard and complies with the European energy

labelling directives.

5. Lack of relief will impose economic hardship on Indesit Company particularly

where Indesit washing machines are sold as a pair with a matching tumble

dryer,  which is common practice in the USA.

6. Indesit will notify all clothes dryer manufacturers of domestically marketed

units known to Indesit of this petition and application by letter.

We would be pleased to discuss this request with the DOE and to provide any further

information as required.

Yours sincerely,

Aldo Cariati    

Marketing Manager International Business
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .



                                EXHIBIT NUMBER 8

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARY                                     JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
---------------------------------                                     -----------------------------
<S>                                                                  <C>
Double Happiness Tyre Industries Corporation Limited                  The People's Republic of China
Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Co., Limited                                  The People's Republic of China
Yinchuan C.S.I. (Greatwall) Rubber Co., Limited                       The People's Republic of China
Hangzhou Fu Chun Jiang Chemical Industrial Co., Limited               The People's Republic of China
Orion Tire Corporation                                                The United States of America
Orion (B.V.I.) Tire Corporation                                       British Virgin Islands
Container Limited                                                     British Virgin Islands
CSI Rubber Industries Limited                                         Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Century Lead Limited                                                  British Virgin Islands
Capital Canton Limited                                                British Virgin Islands
Leading Returns Limited                                               British Virgin Islands
Sincere Ocean Limited                                                 British Virgin Islands
Ventures Kingdom Limited                                              British Virgin Islands
Wealth Faith Limited                                                  British Virgin Islands
Million Good Limited                                                  British Virgin Islands
Easy Legend Limited                                                   British Virgin Islands
Great Windfall Agents Limited                                         British Virgin Islands
Honest Map Limited                                                    British Virgin Islands
Supreme Solutions Limited                                             British Virgin Islands
</TABLE>





                                      148
EPA SANITIZED
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
#### Marie Taborda, Respondent, v Henry Taborda, Appellant.

— Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see, Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg,*127 AD2d 766). (Appeal from Order of Queens County Family Court, Torres, J. — Family Offense.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
----- Forwarded by Greg Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/09/2007 07:02 AM -----

"Borrelli,

Frank" <Frank_Borrelli@ To americanchemistr Greg Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

y.com> cc

11/08/2007 04:35 Subject PM RE: Question About Compounding

Greg, I was traveling this week and wanted to modify the flow sheet to correctly show the emission points for the PVC process before sending to you. I have attached a revised presentation with the corrected flow sheet slide. Regarding compounding, that is often the next step following the manufacturing of PVC resin. It is a completely different manufacturing step and is purely the mixing of PVC resin with other additives; colorants, stabilizers, and other additives. It is usually not part of a PVC manufacturing facility but is completed in separate mixing equipment and mostly carried out in facilities not located where the PVC is manufactured. PVC compounding can result in the polymer being mixed with ingredients that make the polymer useful in rigid applications like pipe and in flexible application like in the manufacturing of wire and cable jacketing and insulation materials. Some other polymers would similarly require mixing of colorants and stabilizers but may be carried out in different equipment. I have attached a paper on PVC pipe manufacturing and the compounding step in that process. As HAPs are not usually introduced and emitted from these processes, I am not sure how they fit into the standards. I would think that these facilities that involve a specific HAP material would fall under the regulatory requirements for processing that specific material. With PVC pipe we did not find any HAPs in the compounding and manufacturing of the pipe materials. Regards

From: Nizich.Greg@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Nizich.Greg@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:43 PM To: Borrelli, Frank Subject: Question About Compounding

Hi Frank,

I'm trying to get a better understanding of how compounding fits in with the PVC operations. I know Ken Akins said it was essentially mixing dry ingredients. Do you know if this process is also done with other polymer resins? I'm thinking that maybe it's already addressed elsewhere under another
standard so it wouldn't even be a concern here. Also, were you going to send us a copy of the meeting presentation?

Thanks.
Greg. (See attached file: RVCM 101_EPA_Oct 07_final.ppt)(See attached file: 07 06 08 Emmission Paper.pdf)
#### Cathy E. Lesanti, Respondent, v Harmac Industries, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Loafin’ Tree Rest, v Pardi*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Den-man, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.