alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009267EN.01001802.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/18

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)) — Glaxo Wellcome GmbH & Co. v Finanzamt München II

(Case C-182/08) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment and free movement of capital - Corporation tax - Acquisition of shares in a capital company - Conditions for taking into account, when determining the acquirer’s tax base, the reduction in value of the shares resulting from the dividend distribution)

2009/C 267/31

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Glaxo Wellcome GmbH & Co.

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt München II

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Articles 43 and 56 EC — Acquisition by a taxpayer who is entitled to a corporation tax credit of shares in a capital company which is fully taxable — National legislation providing for the taking into account, when determining the acquirer’s tax base, of depreciation of the shares by reason of the payment of dividends where the shares were acquired from a shareholder who is entitled to a corporation tax credit, but which excludes that reduction of the tax base where the shares were acquired from a shareholder who is not entitled to a tax credit of that kind

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 73b of the EC Treaty (now Article 56 EC) must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which excludes the reduction in value of shares as a result of the distribution of dividends from the basis of assessment for a resident taxpayer, where that taxpayer has acquired shares in a resident capital company from a non-resident shareholder, whereas, had the shares been acquired from a resident shareholder, such a reduction in value would have reduced the acquirer’s basis of assessment.

This applies in cases where such legislation does not exceed what is necessary to maintain a balanced allocation of the power to impose taxes between the Member States and to prevent wholly artificial arrangements which do not reflect economic reality and whose only purpose is unduly to obtain a tax advantage. It is for the national court to examine whether the legislation at issue in the main proceedings is limited to what is necessary in order to attain those objectives.

---

(1)  OJ C 197, 2.8.2008.

1

---
District 1
- Carol L. Maines District 2
- Richard L. Parent, Jr. District 3
- RogerA. Moody

July 8,2014 Mr. Michael Martin Essential Air Service Division, X-53 U.S. Department ofTransportation . 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: DOT-OST-1997-2784 DearMr. Martin: The County ofKnox owns and operates the Knox County Regional Airport, Owls Head, Maine (RKD). The three elected Knox County Commissioners voted (3-0) on July8, 2014 to endorse and support Cape Air's proposal to continue EAS services at our airport for four (4) more years, with their six (6) summertime, round-trip, option. The Commission hosted apublic informational hearing onJune 10,2014. Cape Airpresented their draft proposals. Their proposal was posted on our website andthe public was able toprovide comments/input through July 7, 2014. The recurring (and only) complaint associated with Cape Air's past service has been the limited number of available seats/flights during ourpeak summer months. Cape Air included the 'W6' option in direct response to customer feed-back and Knox County's specific request. The Commission understands the Cessna 402 does not meet the 15-or-more-passenger-seat standard called for by the governing statutes, and that we are, in effect, waiving our right to a 1S-seat or larger aircraft, forthis four-year carrier-selection. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the EAS proposal. If. we can provide any further information, please feel free to contact the Airport Manager, JeffNorthgraves at 594-4131 

### or via email atjnorthgraves@knoxcountymaine.gov. 

# sinci,t/IL

Carol L. Maines, Chair Knox County Commission cc: Andrew Bonney, Hyannis Air Service, Inc. Mr. John Guimond, 

### AirportManager, AUO Larry Pritchett, Mayor, City ofRockland JeffNorthgraves, Airport Manager, RKD
# C_2020329EN.01000202.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/2

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — proceedings brought by S.A.D. Maler und Anstreicher OG

(Case C-256/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Effective judicial protection in the areas covered by EU law - Principle of judicial independence - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Jurisdiction of the Court - Article 267 TFEU - Admissibility - National provisions relating to the allocation of cases in a court or tribunal - Remedy - Interpretation necessary to enable the referring court to give judgment - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 329/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

S.A.D. Maler und Anstreicher OG

Intervening parties: Magistrat der Stadt Wien, Bauarbeiter Urlaubs- und Abfertigungskasse

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Vienna Administrative Court, Austria), by decision of 27 February 2019, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
# C_2009069EN.01003104.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-48/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 69/64)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
# C_2009113EN.01001203.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-298/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/22/EC - Approximation of laws - Social legislation relating to road transport activities - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

2009/C 113/24

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell and I. Chatzigiannis, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 35)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2006/22; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2006/22;

| 2. | orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6203
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BARRY R. BIBB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-97-56) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 19, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry R. Bibb, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Barry R. Bibb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for calculation of a term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bibb , No. CR-97-56 (W.D. Va. Jan. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 82 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 82

    Calling on schools and State and local educational agencies to 
 recognize that dyslexia has significant educational implications that 
                           must be addressed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

 Mr. Palazzo submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Calling on schools and State and local educational agencies to 
 recognize that dyslexia has significant educational implications that 
                           must be addressed.

Whereas, defined as an unexpected difficulty in reading in an individual who has 
        the intelligence to be a much better reader, dyslexia reflects a 
        difficulty in getting to the individual sounds of spoken language which 
        typically impacts speaking, reading, spelling, and often, learning a 
        second language;
Whereas dyslexia is highly prevalent, affecting one out of five individuals in 
        some form, and is persistent;
Whereas dyslexia is a paradox, so that often the same individual who has a 
        weakness in decoding or reading fluency also has strengths in higher 
        level cognitive functions such as reasoning, critical thinking, concept 
        formation, and problem solving;
Whereas great progress has been made in understanding dyslexia at a scientific 
        level, including its epidemiology, and cognitive and neurobiological 
        bases; and
Whereas diagnosis of dyslexia is critical, and must lead to focused, evidence-
        based interventions, necessary accommodations, self-awareness, self-
        empowerment, and school and life success: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls on schools and 
State and local educational agencies to recognize that dyslexia has 
significant educational implications that must be addressed.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009267EN.01002302.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/23

---

Order of the Court of 9 July 2009 — Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-498/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility because out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2009/C 267/40

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA (represented by: M. Salvi, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Zadra and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 9 September 2008 in Case T-224/08 Fornaci Laterizi Danesi v Commission — by which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/25/EC of 13 November 2007 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region (OJ 2008 L 12, p. 383), in so far as a plot of land belonging to the applicant, under reference IT20A0018, was included in that list.

Fornaci Laterizi Danesi

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fornaci Laterizi Danesi SpA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
November 2, 1999

21928

#### Helfand, In re

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Biological Control Organism Permits

Last Modified: 

Print

Under the authority of the Plant Protection Act of 2000, a Plant Protection and

Quarantine (PPQ) 526 permit is required for the importation, interstate movement

and environmental release of biological control organisms of plant pests and weeds.

Biological control organisms regulated by PPQ include:

Invertebrate predators and parasites (parasitoids) or competitors used to

control invertebrate plant pests

Invertebrate herbivores used to control weeds

Microbial pathogens used to control invertebrate plant pests

Microbial pathogens used to control weeds

Non-pathogenic microorganisms used to control plant pathogens

Genetically modified biological control organisms require permits from

Biotechnology Regulatory Services.

Specific procedures need to be followed when proposing the first time environmental

release of a biological control organism:

Applying for a PPQ 526 Permit

Examples of biological control organisms that do NOT typically need a PPQ 526

permit but may be regulated by other federal agencies or individual states are:
Biological control organisms against pests, parasites or diseases, or vectors of

diseases of vertebrates (including livestock, fish and pets)

Interstate movement of microbial biocontrol organisms (“biopesticides”)

registered by Environmental Protection Agency.

Biopesticides that are biological controls, according to APHIS, would be any

registered pesticide used to control a plant pest, weed or plant disease for which the

active ingredient is a live microbial organism, including the metabolites of that

organisms.

A Message From USDA to Landowners and

Managers

Moving Tamarisk Leaf Beetles (Diorhabda species)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4281 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 396
115th CONGRESS
   2d Session
                                H. R. 4281

                          [Report No. 115-531]

   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
    capital for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2017

Mr. Kihuen (for himself and Mr. Mooney of West Virginia) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

                            January 29, 2018

                   Additional sponsor: Ms. Velazquez

                            January 29, 2018

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
    [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on 
                           November 7, 2017]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
    capital for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Access to Capital for 
Rural Job Creators Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR RURAL-AREA SMALL BUSINESSES.

    Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (j)(4)(C), by striking ``and women-owned 
        small businesses'' and inserting ``, women-owned, and rural-
        area small businesses''; and
            (2) in subsection (j)(6)(B)(iii), by striking ``and women-
        owned small businesses'' and inserting ``, women-owned, and 
        rural-area small businesses''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 396

115th CONGRESS

   2d Session

                               H. R. 4281

                          [Report No. 115-531]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
    capital for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 29, 2018

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. MARCHANT:
       H.R. 6209.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. The Congress shall have 
     Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, 
     to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and 
     general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts 
     and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.
```
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 1 2/1 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Florida Department of Environmental

Protection
**SUMMARY :**  

### The EPA Office of Atmospheric Programs provided information on the Clean Power Plan to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection 

### on August 27 , 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Exis ting Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Erich Eschmann / EPA OAP **External Stakeholders** Cindy Mulkey/FL DEP
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Winmark Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, John L. Morgan, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WinmarkCorporation and will be retained by Winmark Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 
| Date:  March 11, 2010 | /s/ John L. Morgan                      |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                       | John L. Morgan  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,421,742
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,086,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (622,170)
<INVENTORY>                                 15,657,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,503,504
<PP&E>                                       7,610,505
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,270,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,407,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,414,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    50,031,213
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,562,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,407,241
<SALES>                                     24,552,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,552,873
<CGS>                                        9,647,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,936,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                77,156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,728,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,816,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,728,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,677,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>