alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                              EXHIBIT NUMBER 12(2)

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Chow Chun Man, Jimmy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Enterprises,
      Limited;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
      have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
      report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: July 22, 2004

                            /s/ Chow Chun Man, Jimmy
                            ------------------------
                              CHOW CHUN MAN, JIMMY
                             Chief Financial Officer

                                      252
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 437 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 437

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 
    existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security 
   Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding for 
   enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass 
                       prophylaxis capabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself and Mrs. Brooks of Indiana) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 
    existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security 
   Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding for 
   enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass 
                       prophylaxis capabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Preparedness Allowable Use 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS FOR ENHANCING 
              MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, AND MASS 
              PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES.

    Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (14) 
                as paragraphs (11) through (15), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following 
                new paragraph (10):
            ``(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge 
        capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, including the 
        development and maintenance of an initial pharmaceutical 
        stockpile, including medical kits, and diagnostics sufficient 
        to protect first responders, their families, immediate victims, 
        and vulnerable populations from a chemical or biological 
        event;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ``subsection 
        (a)(10)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)(11)''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00004-CR

Nelson Adjimiro COLLAZO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR0917

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 26, 2013.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      13,573,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,213,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (264,551)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,110,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,892,301
<PP&E>                                       4,087,870
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,916,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,047,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,979,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    41,857,818
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,422,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,047,895
<SALES>                                     23,530,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,530,369
<CGS>                                       11,366,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,312,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               186,002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             302,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,981,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,392,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,588,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,588,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
No. 01-15-00206-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

HOUSTON, TEXAS

__________________________________________________________ 

No. 17166

IN THE 253RD DISTRICT COURT OF 

CHAMBERS COUNTY, TEXAS

__________________________________________________________ 

CODY CRYMES § Appellant

v. § 

STATE OF TEXAS § Appellee

__________________________________________________________ 

STATE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO 

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

__________________________________________________________ 

Cheryl Swope Lieck

District Attorney

Chambers County, Texas

Kathy Esquivel

Assistant District Attorney

Chambers County, Texas

P.O. Box 1409

Anahuac, Texas 77514

(409) 267-2682

(409) 267-3105 

 kesquivel@co.chambers.tx.us

ACCEPTED

01-15-00206-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/15/2015 4:01:05 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/15/2015 4:01:05 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
COMES NOW the State of Texas, by and through her Assistant District 

Attorney, Kathy Esquivel, and, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. PRO. 73, presents this 

Motion for Extension of Time. In support of the motion, the State submits the 

following:

1. The above case is on appeal from a plea of guilty in the 253rd Judicial District 

Court of Chambers County, Texas. 

2. The State’s response is currently due on October 20, 2015. 

3. This is the State’s first Motion for Extension of Time.

4. Counsel for the State was preparing for another jury trial in the 253rd District 

Court and did not have adequate time to complete the brief in this case. 

Further, counsel for the State was preparing a case for a special meeting of the 

grand jury.

5. The State requests that the time for filing the State’s Brief be extended by 7 

days to October 27, 2015. The State requests this extension not for delay, but 

to see that justice is done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State prays that this

Court grant the State’s Motion for Extension of Time and extend the due date of the 

State’s Appellate Brief until October 27, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted,

CHERYL SWOPE LIECK

Chambers County District Attorney

/s/ Kathy Esquivel

KATHY ESQUIVEL

Assistant District Attorney
Chambers County, Texas

P.O. Box 1409

Anahuac, Texas 77514

(409) 267-2682

(409) 267-3105 FAX

SBN 24034432

kesquivel@co.chambers.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been sent to 

opposing counsel via email on ___15th_____ day of October, 2015.

/s/ Kathy Esquivel

KATHY ESQUIVEL

Assistant District Attorney

Chambers County, Texas 

Rick Oliver

Attorney for Appellant
#### In the Matter of John Tylec, Respondent, v Niagara County Legislature et al., Appellants. Floyd Snyder, as Niagara County Republican Chairman, Proposed IntervenorAppellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: At the outset, we note that this action, framed as a request for CPLR article 78 relief, should be converted to a demand for declaratory judgment (CPLR 103 [c]; *Kamhi v Town of Yorktown,*141 AD2d 607, 609, *affd*74 NY2d 423). Upon converting the action to one for declaratory judgment, we agree with the declaration of Supreme Court that the redistricting plan enacted by the Niagara County Legislature is invalid. The plan submitted to the Legislature on April 15th was not in final form and was different from the plan submitted on April 16th and passed by the Legislature on April 23rd. Thus, it violated the seven-day requirement of section 20 (4) of the Municipal Home Rule Law. It was not an abuse of discretion for the Court to deny the motion of the proposed intervenor. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Den-man, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ. (Order entered June 25, 1991.)
April 2019

There were 8 surveillance inspections conducted at 8 different sites for a total of 108

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures began to increase in response to warmer air 

temperatures. There were no cages confirmed this month. All of the sites with fish in 

the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

May 2018 35 0 20449

June 2018 50 0 20499

July 2018 50 0 20549

August 2018 50 0 20599

September 2018 40 0 20639

October 2018 40 0 20679

November 2018 40 0 20719

December 2018 45 0 20764

January 2019 40 0 20804

February 2019 50 0 20854

March 2019 115 0 20969

April 2019 108 0 21077
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CHURCHILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, LP, PARADIGM CONSULTANTS, LLC, RAMESH, JAIN AND VIKAS JAIN,

Respondents

v.

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH
DEPARTMENT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 126 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
In particular, the United States

Department of Agriculture (USDA)

asks outdoor enthusiasts to be aware

of 19 destructive, invasive species

known as Hungry Pests.

That’s because these pests, which

include the emerald ash borer and

Asian longhorned beetle, are primarily spread in the things people move

and pack.

Tips for Outdoor Enthusiasts

Hikers and campers can help protect the great outdoors by following

a few simple tips:

• Before leaving for or from a

camping trip, remove mud and dirt

from cars and recreational vehicles

to prevent moving invasive pests

and their eggs to new areas. Be sure

to clean debris from tires and wheel

wells, as well as tires on mountain

or other bikes you may use.

• Likewise, clean dirt from shoes,

boots, backpacks and other gear.

• Although it may be tempting,

don’t bring back flowers, plants,

leaves or other natural souvenirs

discovered in the wild, as they could

have invasive pests attached to them.

Take photos instead and leave nature

in nature.

• If you’re planning to enjoy an

outdoor campfire, remember, don’t

m

w

c

r

y

y

h

u

p

f

f

t

y

3

t

t

a

f

i

o

r

s

o

t

H

v

DidYou Know?

The United States Department

of Agriculture (USDA) asks outdoor enthusiasts to watch for 19

destructive, invasive species

known as Hungry Pests, which

are primarily spread in the things

people move and pack. Learn

more at www.HungryPests.com,

Facebook and Twitter.

p

Watch out fo

that spread in t

move and pack

And Campers C

Lead-in copy fo
OUR BIZ 

BATTLES THE BUG

aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slfbiz
aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slfbiz

WE’VE JOINED 

THE BATTLE TO 

BEAT THE BUG
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Milestone Scientific Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard Osser, Chief Executive
Officer of Milestone, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of Milestone.









                              /s/ Leonard Osser
                              ----------------------
                              Leonard Osser
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              March 31, 2006
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.4
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of 1st Realty Investments, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2002, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jay N. Torok, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Jay N. Torok
                                         ----------------
                                         Jay N. Torok
                                         Chairman of the Board
                                         Principal Executive Officer
                                         November 14, 2002

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

                                       1
Exhibit 13  Certification pursuant to Rule 15d-14b under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934



---

Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an
Australian corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 24, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ John Bevan
|                      |  |  |  | Name:          |  | John Bevan             
|                      |  |  |  | Title:         |  | Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2018

No. 04-18-00206-CR

Remigio A. MARTINEZ III,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003CR5033

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Remigio A. Martinez III filed a notice of appeal complaining that the trial 

court denied his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. 

“Neither the United States nor Texas constitution guarantees the right to appeal state 

criminal convictions.” Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 646 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); accord

Phynes v. State, 828 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). A defendant may appeal a state 

criminal conviction only as authorized by statute. Griffin, 145 S.W.3d at 646; Phynes, 828 

S.W.2d at 2. “No statute vests [an appellate court] with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order 

denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.” Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex.

App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.); accord Reyes v. State, No. 04-12-00267-CR, 2012 

WL 2602965, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 5, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication); Wilson v. State, No. 02-12-00382-CR, 2013 WL 257278, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth Jan. 24, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 

The proper remedy to obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc 

is by petition for writ of mandamus. Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2010); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148–49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 

We ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of 

the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of April, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2008079EN.01002002.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/20

---

Appeal brought on 24 January 2008 by Giuseppe Gargani against the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2007 in Case T-94/06 Giuseppe Gargani v European Parliament

(Case C-25/08 P)

(2008/C 79/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Giuseppe Gargani (represented by: W. Rothley, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2007 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2007 in its entirety;

| — | refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for a fresh decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the Court of First Instance for a fresh decision;

| — | order the respondent to pay the costs of the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the respondent to pay the costs of the appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Court of First Instance failed to give the appellant a fair hearing by failing to address the appellant's submissions and, instead, changing the parties and then declaring the action to be inadmissible.

The action, which was brought by the Chairman of the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs, not (as stated in the order under appeal) by an individual as such, is expressly directed against the then President of the European Parliament, and not against the European Parliament itself or against a ‘natural person’. The Court of First Instance regards the appellant as any Italian applicant seeking a declaration that the conduct of the European Parliament is unlawful, and the President of the European Parliament at the time as any Spanish defendant being accused in respect of the unlawful conduct of the President of the European Parliament.

The Court of First Instance failed to ascertain whether the judicial system provides a means of redress that would enable the chairman of a committee to apply for a declaration of unlawfulness in respect of the conduct of the President of the European Parliament where the latter exceeds his powers under the Rules of Procedure and thereby infringes the participation rights of a committee chairman or of the Parliament as a whole.

---
19618

#### State v. Agustin

Affirmed