alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111 111,

HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 

### 1 OF THE PARISH OF TERREBONNE, STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 3 OF THE PARISH OF LAFOURCHE, STATE OF LOUISIANA AND THIBODAUX REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. NO. 

### 2023 CW 1273



### FEBRUARY 16, 2024

In Re: Thibodaux Regional Health System, Inc., 

### applying for



### supervisory writs, 

### 32nd Judicial District Court, 

### Parish of Terrebonne, No. 195104.

BEFORE: CHUTZ, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

Greene, J., 

### dissents and would grant the writ. Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1422 provides that "[ p]arties 

## mayobtain discovery regarding anymatter, not privileged, which 

### is relevant to the subject matter 

### involved in the 

### pending action, 

### whether it relates to the claim or defense 

### of the party seeking 

## discovery or to the claim or 

### defense of any other 

### party[.]" Further, Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 

### 1426 states that "[ 

## u]pon motion bya party orbythe person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown, the court... may make 

## anyorderwhich justice requires to protect a party or person[.]" I 

### find that plaintiff, Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of Terrebonne, State of Louisiana, failed to 

## meet itsburdenofshowinggoodcauseforaprotective order.

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### PUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                         OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                               TO CHANGE THE NAME

                                       OF

                          PACKAGING PLUS SERVICES, INC.

  (Pursuant to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 7, Chapter 78)

It is hereby certified that:

1.   The name of the corporation (the "corporation") is Packaging Plus Services,
     Inc.

2.   The Board of Directors of the corporation duly adopted the following
     resolution on May 12, 1998:

         RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors deem it advisable and in the best
         interests of the corporation that the corporation change its name to
         Universal Express, Inc. and that, in order to accomplish the same,
         Article 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read as
         follows:

            "The name of the Corporation is: Universal Express, Inc."

3.   Approval and consent of the stockholders of the corporation to the change
     of name was obtained on June 11, 1998 pursuant to Section 38.320 (2) of the
     General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada.

Signed on June 11, 1998
                                                     By /s/ RICHARD A. ALTOMARE
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Richard A. Altomare
                                                        President and Secretary

STATE OF NEW YORK )
                                    )       SS.
COUNTY OF NASSAU  )

         On June 11, 1998, personally appeared before me, a Notary Public, for
the State and County aforesaid, Richard A. Altomare, as President and Secretary
of Packaging Plus Services, Inc., who acknowledged that he executed the above
instrument.



                                                      /s/
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Notary Public
1 

### Werner, Christopher Subject: Interagency call with OMB and other Federal agencie s on Regional Haze Rule Revisions Location: RTP-C400A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C
Start: Mon 2/8/2016 1:00 PM End: Mon 2/8/2016 2:00 PM
Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: Werner, Christopher Required Attendees: Jones, Rhea; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov Optional Attendees: Misenis, Chris; Timin, Brian; Wood, Anna Resources: RTP-C300A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C300C-Max50/RTP-Bld g-C; RTP-C400CMax20/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C500A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C 500C-Max20/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C600A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C600C-Max40/RTP-Bld g-C; RTP-C400AMax40/RTP-Bldg-C Categories: Regional Haze, Important
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000857264
<NAME> KRUPP GOVERNMENT INCOME TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      19,053,931
<SECURITIES>                               210,608,510<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,707,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,263,514<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             241,633,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,353,147<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   233,015,255
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,265,352<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               241,733,754
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,358,040<F5>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,877,345<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,480,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,480,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,480,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
<FN>
<F1>Includes Participating Insured Mortgage Investments ("PIMIs") (insured
mortgages of $114,625,179 and Additional Loans of $20,749,108), Participating
Insured Mortgages ("PIMs") of $48,479,897 and Mortgage-Backed Securities
("MBS") of $26,754,326.
<F2>Includes prepaid acquisition fees and expenses of $13,473,359 net of
accumulated amortization of $6,090,173 and prepaid participating servicing of
$4,491,005 net of accumulated amortization of $1,610,677.
<F3>Includes deferred income on Additional Loans of $7,325,414
<F4>Unrealized gain on MBS
<F5>Represents interest income on investments in mortgages and cash
<F6>Includes $1,613,665 of amortization for prepaid fees and expenses
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5629]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. BLUMENAUER:
       H.R. 6249.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The Constitution of the United States provides clear 
     authority for Congress to pass legislation regarding taxes. 
     In particular, Article I of the Constitution clearly 
     describes the Congressional authority to levy excise taxes, 
     providing ``The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect 
     Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises . . .'' (U.S. Const, Art. 
     I, Sec. 8, cl. I).
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5292]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mrs. EMERSON:
       H.R. 6192.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The ability to regulate interstate commerce pursuant to 
     Article I, Section 8, Clause 3.
```
(August 15, 1991)

#### Maritza Rodriguez, Appellant, v John Polakowski, Doing Business as Kirla Group, et al., Respondents.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Gorski, J.), entered January 12, 1990, which upon a jury verdict, found in favor of defendant John Polakowski, doing business as Kirla Group, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On the record, the jury could reasonably have concluded that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of demonstrating that defendant-landlord had actual prior notice of the allegedly defective condition of the bathroom ceiling. Plaintiff claimed that several months before the ceiling collapsed, the landlord had made an inspection of the premises and should have been aware of its defective condition. She also testified that, with the assistance of a neighbor and tenant organizer, she sent a written complaint to the landlord about needed apartment repairs, including the bathroom ceiling. In contrast, the landlord denied receiving any written correspondence concerning the subject premises and testified that his inspection of the premises did not reveal a problem with plaintiff’s bathroom ceiling. Thus, while there was conflicting testimony as to whether the landlord had received notice of the alleged condition in plaintiff’s bathroom before the incident occurred in June 1985, the jury resolved the disputed facts in favor of defendant and the record presents no reasonable basis to disturb the jury’s verdict. *(Picciallo v Norchi,*147 AD2d 540.)

Furthermore, evidence of defendant-landlord’s repair bills was admissible *(see, Prestige Fabrics v Novick & Co.,*60 AD2d 517), to rebut plaintiff’s claim that no repairs had been made to any of the tenants’ apartments in the subject building. Although defense counsel, on summation, improperly commented that the bills indicated that repairs were, in fact, generally made, the error was not of sufficient significance to warrant a reversal.

Additionally, plaintiff was not prejudiced by defense coun*727sel’s summation remarks since the comments, when read in context, were within the bounds of the wide latitude allowed to counsel on summation, and in any event, any possible prejudice was corrected by the court’s curative instructions during its charge. *(See, Kwasny v Feinberg,*157 AD2d 396.) Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
#### Brown v. Brown

20103

5/27/98

Affirmed
**Exhibit 10(cc)**
 
 
November, 4, 2002
SERI Plan Contract Holder
 
 
Dear                               :
**Re:     Supplemental Retirement Income (SERI) Plan**
You are a participant in the Corporation’s SERI Plan and have entered into acontract with the Corporation which establishes your right to, and the formulafor calculating, benefits under the Plan.
Your contract presently defines “Earnings” as “the Executive’s annual base payplus 100% of all bonuses paid or payable to the Executive in a calendar year.”
It is proposed that the definition of “Earnings” in your SERI contract beamended as follows:
     “The term “Earnings” shall mean the Executive’s annual base payplus:
 a) 100% of all bonuses paid or payable to the Executivein a calendar year pursuant to the Corporation’s annualincentive plan or any similar plan substituted therefor; and  b) any other payment made in a given year to theExecutive which payment is specifically designated to beincluded in Earnings by the Compensation Committee of theBoard of Directors of the Corporation.”
For the purposes of calculating benefits payable under the SERI Plan,the amended definition of “Earnings” as set forth above shall be appliedretroactively to the date of implementation of the SERI Plan.
Page 1

 

Please signify your agreement with the foregoing, including theamendment to the definition of “Earnings” in your SERI contract, bysigning the enclosed copy of this letter where indicated and returningit to me.
Yours truly,
/s/ John L.M. Hampton
/dn
AGREED to and accepted the              day of November, 2002.
    Name (Please Print) Signature
/dn
Page 2
# C_2010051EN.01001501.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/15

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Gerasimos Potamianos (C-561/08 P), Gerasimos Potamianos v Commission of the European Communities (C-4/09 P)

(Joined Cases C-561/08 P and C-4/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil Service - Temporary agent - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Act having adverse effect))

2010/C 51/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curral and D. Martin, agents) (C-561/08 P), Gerasimos Potamianos (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer) (C-4/09 P)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Gerasimos Potamianos (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer) (C-4/09 P), Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curral and D. Martin, agents) (C-561/08 P)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2008 in Case T-160/04 Potamianos v Commission in which the Court held that that action brought by Mr Potamianos against the notification by the Director-General of the Directorate-General for ‘Research’, of information according to which his contract as a member of the temporary staff would not be renewed beyond its date of expiry — Concept of an act adversely affecting the official — Differences in the interpretation between the Court, first, and the Court of First Instance and the Civil Service Tribunal, second

Potamianos

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeals are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeals are dismissed.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.02.2009

1

OJ C 82, 04.04.2009

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88392-88393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 5, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President, One Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#38737b79484854515b594c5157567b5755555d564c4b78535b165e4a5a16574a5f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ade6eeecddddc1c4ceccd9c4c2c3eec2c0c0c8c3d9deedc6ce83cbdfcf83c2dfca">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The Gary and Dixie Beymer Trust, Gary Beymer and Dixie Beymer, 
as co-trustees, all of Lakin, Kansas; the Robert Beymer Revocable Trust 
dtd 02/24/2022, Robert Beymer as trustee, the Diane Beymer Credit 
Shelter Trust, Robert Beymer as trustee, all of Garden City, Kansas; C. 
Easton Beymer, Kingwood, Texas; Blake Beymer, Holcomb, Kansas; Brick 
Beymer and Michelle Thompson (n[eacute]e Beymer), both of Lakin, 
Kansas; Caitlin Orcutt (n[eacute]e Beymer), Milliken, Colorado; and 
Taryn Remey (n[eacute]e Beymer), McPherson, Kansas; to form the Beymer 
Family Control Group, a group acting in

[[Page 88393]]

concert, to retain voting shares of Lakin Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of the KCB Bank, both of Lakin, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Erin M. Cayce,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-28035 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO
AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Dendrite International, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), John E. Bailye, as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Kathleen E. Donovan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:


     (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|JOHN E. BAILYE
Name:  John E. Bailye
Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 13, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

|KATHLEEN E. DONOVAN
Name:  Kathleen E. Donovan
Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 13, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-113590 on Form S-3,and Registration Statement Nos. 33-35357, 333-104249 and 333-80577, on Form S-8, of our reportdated March 1, 2006, relating to the financial statements of Giant Industries, Inc. andSubsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting method for the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Asset Retirement Obligations” in 2003 and a change inaccounting method for the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation 47,“Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” in 2005), our report dated March 1, 2006relating to the financial statement schedule of the Company, and to our report dated March 1, 2006relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPPhoenix, Arizona
# C_2008107EN.01001801.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België lodged on 18 February 2008 — UDV North America Inc v Brandtraders NV

(Case C-62/08)

(2008/C 107/26)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: UDV North America Inc

Appellant:

Respondent: Brandtraders NV

Respondent:

Questions referred

| (1) | For there to be use of the sign within the meaning of Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d) of Council Regulation 40/94 (1) of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, is it necessary that a third party, within the meaning of Article 9(1)(a) of the Regulation:






  (a) | uses the sign on his own behalf? |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

For there to be use of the sign within the meaning of Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d) of Council Regulation 40/94 (1) of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, is it necessary that a third party, within the meaning of Article 9(1)(a) of the Regulation:

1

(a)

uses the sign on his own behalf?

| (b) | uses the sign as an interested party in relation to trade in goods in which he is himself a contractual party? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

uses the sign as an interested party in relation to trade in goods in which he is himself a contractual party?

| (2) | Can a trade intermediary who acts in his own name, but not on his own behalf, be regarded as a third party who uses the sign within the meaning of Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d)? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Can a trade intermediary who acts in his own name, but not on his own behalf, be regarded as a third party who uses the sign within the meaning of Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d)?

---

(1)  OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1.

1

---