alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) AND
      15D-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. Lowry Mays, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of AMFM Operating, Inc.
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AMFM Operating, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 26, 2004


/s/ L. LOWRY MAYS
------------------------------------
L. Lowry Mays
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
DLD-277 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 14-2108

___________

IN RE: ARTHUR D’AMARIO III, 

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

(Related to D.N.J. Crim. No. 06-cr-00112-001)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

June 12, 2014

Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 19, 2014)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Arthur D’Amario III has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, asking for the 

following relief: (1) “For the forced recusal of Judge Paul S. Diamond from U.S. v. 

D’Amario, No. CR 6-112-PSD (D/NJ), due to bias, judicial fraud and criminality”; (2) 

“For the release of Petitioner from a false imprisonment”; and (3) “That this Court place 

Judge Diamond under arrest and subject him to a comprehensive inpatient mental 

evaluation.” Because D’Amario’s requests are either frivolous or not properly brought in 

a petition for a writ of mandamus, we will deny the petition.
2

As to his first request, while mandamus is available to review a district court’s 

refusal to recuse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), see Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, 

Inc., 10 F.3d 155, 163 (3d Cir. 1993), D’Amario’s request is baseless. We see nothing in 

the record that would give us reason to question the District Court’s impartiality. As to 

his second, mandamus is not a proper means for seeking release from imprisonment, as 

mandamus cannot serve as a substitute for an appeal. See Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 

74, 77 (3d Cir. 1996). Indeed, D’Amario’s appeal from the revocation of his supervised 

release is currently pending. See C.A. No. 13-3515. Finally, D’Amario’s third request, 

which is in any event frivolous, is not properly brought in a petition for a writ of 

mandamus. See In re McBryde, 117 F.3d 208, 220 n.7 (5th Cir. 1997).1

For the foregoing reasons, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

 

1

In his supplement, D’Amario states that previous failures to release him to his mother as 

part of his supervised release “warrant[] a full criminal investigation by the Circuit.” 

Courts of appeals do not undertake criminal investigations. While a district court has

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to issue a writ “to compel an officer or employee of 

the United States . . . to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff,” the writ may issue only for 

“a clear nondiscretionary duty.” Heckler v. Ringer, 466 U.S. 602, 616 (1984). Initiation 

of a criminal investigation is a discretionary act and thus not the proper subject of a 

mandamus request. See, e.g., Jafree v. Barber, 689 F.2d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 1982).
EXHIBIT 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company
Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Han Zhihao, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: May 19, 2009

By:

/s/ Han ZhihaoName: Title:

Han Zhihao Chief Financial
Officer
# C_2021088EN.01001001.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2021 — Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Europe Inc. v European Commission

(Case C-466/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Market for UMTS-compliant baseband chipsets - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 18(3) - Decision to request information - Necessity of the information requested - Proportionality - Burden of proof - Self-incrimination)

(2021/C 88/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Europe Inc. (represented by: M. Pinto de Lemos Fermiano Rato, avocat, and M. Davilla, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, G. Conte, M. Farley and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Qualcomm Inc. and Qualcomm Europe Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Qualcomm Inc. and Qualcomm Europe Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89054-89055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Cooperative Studies Scientific Evaluation Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 10, that the Cooperative 
Studies Scientific Evaluation Committee (CSSEC) will hold a meeting on 
January 18, 2024, via Zoom from 1-4 p.m. EST.
    The Committee provides expert advice on VA cooperative studies, 
multi-site clinical research activities and policies related to 
conducting and managing these efforts. The session will be open to the 
public for the first 30 minutes of the meeting (approximately) for the 
discussion of administrative matters and the general status of the 
program. The remaining portion of the meeting will be closed to the 
public for the Committee's review, discussion and evaluation of 
research and development applications.

[[Page 89055]]

    During the closed portion of the meeting, the Committee's 
discussions and recommendations will address the qualifications of the 
personnel conducting the studies; staff and consultant critiques of 
research proposals and similar documents; and the medical records of 
study subjects, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Additionally, premature 
disclosure of research information to the public could significantly 
obstruct implementation of approved research activities. As provided by 
Public Law 92-463 subsection 10(d), and amended by Public Law 94-409, 
closing the Committee meeting is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) 
and (9)(B).
    The Committee will accept oral comments from the public for the 
open portion of the meeting. Members of the public who wish to attend 
the open teleconference should call 872-701-0185, conference ID 456 277 
285#. Those who plan to attend or would like additional information 
should contact David Burnaska, Program Manager, Cooperative Studies 
Program (14RD), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20420, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c280d1a0508422e191e020d1f070d2c1a0d420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3074514659541e7245425e51435b517046511e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>. Those wishing to submit 
written comments may send them to Mr. Burnaska at the same address and 
email.

    Dated: December 20, 2023.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-28377 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Adams, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered August 13, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Upon pleading guilty to the reduced charge of attempted *959promoting prison contraband in the first degree, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of *IV2*to 3 years to run consecutive to the one he was then serving. Not only did defendant receive the most lenient sentence possible (Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [e]; [4] [b]), but he pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed, including the fact that it would be a consecutive sentence. In addition, contrary to defendant’s contention, there is nothing in the record to indicate that he did not understand any aspect of either the plea bargain or the sentencing proceeding. Under the circumstances, we reject defendant’s claim that the sentence he bargained for is harsh and excessive *(see, People v Wolmart,*140 AD2d 733, *lv denied*72 NY2d 926; *People v Neira,*130 AD2d 518, *lv denied*70 NY2d 715; *People v McManus,*124 AD2d 305). Finally, it cannot be said that defense counsel failed to meet the standards enunciated in *People v Baldi*(54 NY2d 137) *(see, People v Mayes,*133 AD2d 905, 906).

Casey, J. P., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 05, 2006

Mr. Timothy G. Chovanec

Law Offices of Timothy G. Chovanec, P.C.

314 Main Street, Suite 300 

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Honorable Vicki B. Isaacks

393rd District Judge

1450 E. McKinney Street

Denton, TX 76201

Ms. Diana L. Faust

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, TX 75202

RE:Case Number:  06-0108

Court of Appeals Number:  02-04-00275-CV

Trial Court Number:  2002-60191-393

Style:IN RE  MAIN PLACE CUSTOM HOMES, INC.

Dear Counsel:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally grants in part and denies in part the petition for writ of mandamus and delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  The stay order issued March 9, 2006 is lifted.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0108Page 1**
# C_2021481EN.01002001.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Irideos SpA v Poste Italiane SpA, interveners: Fastweb SpA, Tim SpA

(Case C-419/19) (1)

(2021/C 481/27)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip L. Calamia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Philip L. Calamia                                         
|Philip L. Calamia                                             
|Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

April 24, 2009

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                           5
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                     11,294,942
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  66,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             17,582,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 16,630,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               17,582,514
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           11,007,336
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            3,569,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               17,173
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            126,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             7,293,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         7,293,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                7,293,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        
 

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5805]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Kirsten E. Gillibrand led the Pledge of Allegiance, as 
follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4319 

To amend the FAST Act to improve contracting opportunities for veteranowned small business concerns, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the FAST Act to improve contracting opportunities for veteran-owned small business concerns, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness to Veterans 

5 for Infrastructure Investment Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. 

7 Section 1101(b) of the FAST Act (23 U.S.C. 101 

8 note) is amended— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4319 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(C) VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS

4 CONCERN.—The term ‘veteran-owned small 

5 business concern’ has the meaning given the 

6 term ‘small business concern owned and con7 trolled by veterans’ in section 3(q) of the Small 

8 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)).’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (3) by inserting ‘‘and veteran10 owned small business concerns’’ before the period at 

11 the end; and 

12 (3) in paragraph (4)(B)— 

13 (A) in clause (ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

14 end; 

15 (B) in clause (iii) by striking the period at 

16 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(iv) veterans.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS