# NAIMA / U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report

Prepared for: 

# Knauf Insulation GmbH

Lanett Plant 3502 43 rd 

### Street Lanett, Alabama 36863

Project No. 10-3990.11 January 18, 2011

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

## i Executive Summary
U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 621 glass melt furnace located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH Plant in Lanett, Alabama:

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formal dehyde, phenol, and methanol emission rates from two exhaust stacks associated w ith the Line 621 forming and collection process and the Line 621 curing oven and cooling pr ocess (one stack for each process).
Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO ) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fiel dwork. Tables I and II on the following pages summarize the overall results of the emission s test program.

1 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD ) 2 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

## ii Table I Line 621 Glass Melt Furnace Test Program Results Su mmary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)
Filterable Particulate 8.9E-02 2.7E+00 Antimony < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 Arsenic < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 Beryllium < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 Cadmium 1.6E-05 4.9E-04 Chromium 5.6E-04 1.7E-02 Cobalt < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 Lead 1.6E-04 5.0E-03 Manganese < 3.5E-05 1.1E-03 Nickel < 3.4E-05 1.0E-03 621 Furnace October 20

& 21, 2010

Selenium < 5.7E-05 1.7E-03 621 Furnace October 19,

2010 Mercury 1.2E-04 3.1E-03

621 Furnace October 20

& 21, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium 1.4E-04 4.5E-03 Hydrogen Chloride 2.1E-02 6.2E-01 621 Furnace 19-Oct-10 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.9E-02 1.8E+00 Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

## iii Table II Line 621 Forming and Curing Oven Stacks EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summa ry (Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions)

Source Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm) Formaldehyde 8.2E-02 8.9E-02 Methanol 1.9E-02 2.1E-02 621 Forming Stack October 20,

2010 Phenol < 7.0E-03 7.6E-03

Formaldehyde 7.6E-01 7.9E+00
Methanol 2.9E-02 3.0E-01 621 Curing Oven Stack October 19,

2010 Phenol < 7.2E-03 7.5E-02 Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 

## iv TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................

................................................... ..................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ................................

................................................... ............ 2
2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING



## ................................................... ................................................... . 2
3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............. ................................ 3
3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY 

## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT 

## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 3 3.2 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 4 3.3 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .................. 4 3.4 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 4 3.5 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES



## ................................................... .. 5 3.6 HCOH, P HENOL 

## , AND 

## M E 

## OH C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ........................... 5
4.0 TEST RESULTS .......................................

................................................... ....................... 6

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel Table 2 – Line 621 Glass Melt Furnace Test Program Results Summary Table 3 – Line 621 Forming and Curing Oven Stacks E PA Method 316 Emissions

Test Program Results Summary (Formaldehyde, Methano l, and Phenol Emissions)

FIGURES
Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – G lass Melt Furnace Figure 2– Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Fo rming and Collection Figure 3– Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Cu ring Oven and Cooling Figure 4– Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawin g Figure 5 - Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawi ng Figure 6 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing Figure 7 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Dra wing Figure 8 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing Figure 9 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Draw ing

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results Appendix B – Production Data Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Shee ts and Notes Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 1 

## 1.0 Introduction
U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulat ion Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) and its members to a voluntary collection of residu al risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retain ed by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 621 glass melt furnace located at the Knauf Insulation GmbH Plant in Lanett, Alabama:

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, co balt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formal dehyde, phenol, and methanol emission rates from two exhaust stacks associated w ith the Line 621 forming and collection process and the Line 621 curing oven and cooling pr ocess (one stack for each process).
Testing was performed by METCO Environmental (METCO ) of Carrollton, Texas on behalf of BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fiel dwork. The emissions test program was conducted on October 19, 20 and 21, 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission t ests at each location for each parameter. The field sam pling portion of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1 Emissions Test Program Personnel Personnel Affiliation Daniel Moore METCO Environmental Will Starkey METCO Environmental Mike Luckett METCO Environmental Jeremiah Johnson METCO Environmental

3 

### Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD ) 4 

### Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 2 

## 2.0 Process Description
The processes evaluated by this emissions test prog ram include the Line 621 melt furnace, the Line 621 forming and collection process, and the Li ne 621 curing oven/cooling process. The glass melt furnace fires natural gas and the furnac e feed includes mixed batch and cullet. Emissions from the glass melt furnace are controlle d by a dry electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Emissions from the forming and collection process a re controlled by a wet ESP and emissions from the oven and cooling process are controlled by thermal oxidizers.

2.1 Process Monitoring
During the emissions test program, Line 621 was ope rated under normal conditions. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Other process and control equipment data will be available to U.S. EPA on request.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 3 

## 3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies
Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emiss ions test program can be separated into six categories as follows:
(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content; (2) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals co ncentrations and emission rates; (3) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and em ission rates; (4) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium conc entrations and emission rates; (5) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentration s and emission rates; and, (6) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and emission rates.
Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologi es by category are summarized by Sections 3.1 through 3.6, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moistur e Content
Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weig ht, and moisture content was conducted using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” • Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” • Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concent rations in

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Ana lyzer Procedure) • Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”
These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust ga s flowrates either in conjunction with the isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, discrete measurements conducted in support of the n on-isokinetic sampling methodologies.
Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in acco rdance with the procedures outlined in Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 1-3 for a traver se location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accorda nce with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location during testing.
Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 1 00-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent) and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a Ca lifornia Analytical Instruments (CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sampl e of the gas stream was drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe wi th an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of each test the gas sample was introduced to the anal yzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 4 

## intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition so ftware. A schematic drawing of the emission monitoring system is provided as Figure 4.
Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Me thod 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was determined gravimetrically.

3.2 

## Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission R ates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission r ates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz noz zle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS i mpingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the metals sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

3.3 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates
Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 30B and using a Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent tra p, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, an d (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The f irst impinger was left empty as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 6.

3.4 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rat es

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rat es were measured using the procedures of Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. He xavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzl e, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger wa s filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A sch ematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 7.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 5 

## 3.5 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates
Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and e mission rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. T he Method 26A sampling train consisted of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner ; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter was hed quartz filter with Teflon filter support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) i mpingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known we ight of silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figur e 8 provides an illustration of the Method 26A sample train.

3.6 HCOH, Phenol, and MeOH Concentrations and Emission Rates
Measurement of HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentration s and emission rates were conducted using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Meth od 316 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM98.01. HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and e mission rates were be measured using Metco’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling syste m. This system consisted of (1) a steel nozzle, (2) a heated probe with a gl ass probe liner, (3) four GS impingers, (4) a length of sample line, and (5) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first three impingers were filled with high purity water, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 316 sampling train is provide d as Figure 9.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 6 

## 4.0 Test Results
The overall results of the emissions test program a re summarized by Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Line 621 Glass Melt Furnace Test Program Results Su mmary

Source Test

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm)
Filterable Particulate 8.9E-02 2.7E+00 Antimony < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 Arsenic < 1.8E-05 5.6E-04 Beryllium < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 Cadmium 1.6E-05 4.9E-04 Chromium 5.6E-04 1.7E-02 Cobalt < 4.6E-06 1.4E-04 Lead 1.6E-04 5.0E-03 Manganese < 3.5E-05 1.1E-03 Nickel < 3.4E-05 1.0E-03 621 Furnace October 20

& 21, 2010

Selenium < 5.7E-05 1.7E-03 621 Furnace October 19,

2010 Mercury 1.2E-04 3.1E-03

621 Furnace October 20

& 21, 2010 Hexavalent

Chromium 1.4E-04 4.5E-03 Hydrogen Chloride 2.1E-02 6.2E-01 621 Furnace 19-Oct-10 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.9E-02 1.8E+00 Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table in dicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 7 

## Table 3 Line 621 Forming and Curing Oven Stacks EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summa ry (Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions)

Source Test Date(s) Pollutant MDL used Emission

Rate (lbs/hour) Emission

Rate (lbs/ton) Emission

Rate (mg/dscm) Formaldehyde 8.2E-02 8.9E-02 Methanol 1.9E-02 2.1E-02 621 Forming Stack October 20,

2010 Phenol < 7.0E-03 7.6E-03

Formaldehyde 7.6E-01 7.9E+00
Methanol 2.9E-02 3.0E-01 621 Curing Oven Stack October 19,

2010 Phenol < 7.2E-03 7.5E-02 Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of m g/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

### because exhaust from the process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

### ). (2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the tab le indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test run a re summarized in Appendix A. Process production data is included in Appendix B. Field a nd computer-generated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibr ation documents and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical reports.

### Knauf Insulation GmbH; Lanett, Alabama BTEC Project No. 10-3990.11

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 18, 2011 8 

## Limitations
The information and opinions rendered in this repor t are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or Knauf Insulation GmbH. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent except as required by law or court order. B TEC accepts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignme nt and preparing reports in accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclai ms any responsibility for consequential damages.

This report was prepared by: David Center Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by: Randal J. Tysar Senior Environmental Engineer

# FIGURES

### Diameter: 47.50 in

Points Distance "

12 1.0 11 3.2 10 5.6 9 8.4 8 11.9 7 16.9 6 30.6 5 35.6 4 39.1 3 41.9 2 44.3 1 46.5

Site: Knauf Insulation Lanett, Alabama Site Glass Melt Furnace Stack 621 Line 

## Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Diameter: 174 in

Points Distance "

12 3.7 11 11.7 10 20.6 9 30.8 8 43.6 7 62.0 6 112.2 5 130.7 4 143.4 3 153.7 2 162.6 1 170.6

Note: Four test ports may be used.

Site: Knauf Insulation Lanett, Alabama Site 621 Line - Forming and Collection Stack 

## Figure 2

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Diameter: 73.6 in

Points Distance "

12 1.5 11 4.9 10 8.7 9 13.0 8 18.4 7 26.2 6 47.4 5 55.2 4 60.5 3 64.9 2 68.6 1 72.0

Site: Knauf Insulation Lanett, Alabama Site 621 Line - Curing Oven Stack 

## Figure 3

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

### Bags Samples to analyzers



## Figure 4 Site: USEPA Method 3A Knauf Insulation Lanett, Alabama BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases (Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas Dilution System M&C Model 100-L O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600 CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar bagFigure 5Site:USEPA Method 29Knauf InsulationLanett, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott St.Ferndale, MI 48220-1422PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 6Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationLanett, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott St.Ferndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 7Site:USEPA Method 0061Knauf InsulationLanett, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 8Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainKnauf InsulationLanett, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty100 mL 0.1NSilica GelFigure 9Site:USEPA Method 316Knauf InsulationLanett, AlabamaBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott St.Ferndale Michigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 ml Ultrafiltered H2OHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5

# APPENDIX A Detailed Test Run ResultsPlant Job # Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average
Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/21/2010 Start Run Start Time 9:32:00 13:20:00 8:20:00

Run Finish Time 12:47:00 16:31:00 11:30:00 Net Traversing Points 12 12 12 Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180 D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.432 0.432 0.432 0.432 C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.802 0.802 0.802 0.80 Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011 P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.14 29.12 29.15 ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.39 1.49 1.45 1.44 V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 130.320 135.620 131.143 132.361 t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 87.97 89.25 81.99 86.40 V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 124.246 128.853 126.170 126.423 V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 406.9 403.2 418 409.4 V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 19.15 18.98 19.68 19.27 % H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 13.4 12.8 13.5 13.2 M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.866 0.872 0.865 0.868 %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 8.42 8.35 8.99 8.6 %O 2 Oxygen, % 18.6 18.8 18.54 18.6 % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 73 72.85 72.47 72.8 M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.09 30.09 30.18 30.12 M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.48 28.54 28.54 28.52 P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.4 -0.40 -0.40 -0.40 P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.15 29.11 29.09 29.12 t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 519 517 507 514 ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.117 0.130 0.124 0.124

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 25.3 26.7 26.1 26.0 A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 8,520 9,058

8,846

8,808 Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 18,714 19,760

19,268

19,248 %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.1 95.7 96.2 96.7

W p Production, tons glass per hour W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 10.7 13.0 5.4 9.7 C mg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 3.0 3.6 1.5 2.7 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.10 0.12 0.05 0.09 E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 C mg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E-04 5.5E-04 5.6E-04 5.6E-04 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 1.8E-05 E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 C mg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E-04 5.5E-04 5.6E-04 5.6E-04 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 1.8E-05 E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 C mg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06 E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 2.00 1.97 1.26 1.74 C mg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E-04 5.4E-04 3.5E-04 4.9E-04 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.8E-05 1.2E-05 1.6E-05 E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 54.2 85.6 43.0 60.9 C mg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-02 2.3E-02 1.2E-02 1.7E-02 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-04 8.0E-04 4.0E-04 5.6E-04 E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 C mg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 1.4E-04 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06 4.6E-06 E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Lead Catch Weight, μg 17.7 23.6 12.4 17.9 C mg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 5.0E-03 6.5E-03 3.5E-03 5.0E-03 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-04 2.2E-04 1.1E-04 1.6E-04 E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 C mg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-03 1.0E-03 1.1E-03 1.1E-03 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.4E-05 3.5E-05 3.5E-05 3.5E-05 E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 4.7 3.8 2.5 3.7 C mg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-03 1.0E-03 7.0E-04 1.0E-03 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.3E-05 3.5E-05 2.3E-05 3.4E-05 E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 7.4 5.0 6.3 6.2 C mg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-03 1.4E-03 1.8E-03 1.7E-03 C mg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A E lb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.7E-05 4.6E-05 5.8E-05 5.7E-05 E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.11

Knauf Insulation Lanett AL 621 Furnace Source Starkey PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource ID**Knauf Insulation Lanett Alabama 621 Furnace Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"** Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)**1 10/19/2010 9:52 10/19/2010 11:52 2.57E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 8.35E-05** **2 10/19/2010 12:15 10/19/2010 14:15 2.33E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 7.60E-05** **3 10/19/2010 14:35 10/19/2010 16:35 4.51E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 1.53E-04** Test End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateTotal Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results**Page 1 of 3 1/18/2011** M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)Trap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimit**13.9 9.5 19.2 19,340 8,675 502 Stack gas info from 26A run 1;** **tested simultaneously R1, B 287 6 293 0 293 0.11 0% 2** **13.3 9.3 18.86 19,277 8,730 500 Stack gas info from 26A run 2;** **tested simultaneously R2, B 261 0.3 261.3 0 261.3 0.11 0% 0** **12.8 9.1 18.96 19,960 9,066 500 Stack gas info from 26A run 3;** **tested simultaneously R3, B 499 0.5 499.5 0 499.5 0.11 0% 0** Flue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Trap #1≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for** **Hg conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.** **≤1 μg/dscm** **Page 2 of 3 1/18/2011** M30B Mercury TestingConcentration(μg/dscm)Trap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)Limit**2.57 R1, A 287 1.0 288.00 20 268 0.11 0% 0.3%** **2.36 0.2 4 -0.0360 -20** **2.33 R2, A 251 0.4 251.40 20 231.4 0.11 0% 0.2%** **2.05 0.3 6 -0.0957 -54** **4.51 R3, A 498 0.4 498.40 20 478.4 0.11 0% 0.1%** **4.31 0.2 2 -0.0204 -11** **-29 Average** **Recovery, between 85 and** **115%**Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤**20% of field recovery test** ≤**10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg** **conc. >1**μ**g/dscm: or**≤**20% of Section 1 for Hg conc.≤1** **μg/dscm**≥**10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1** **μg/dscm: or**≤**20% RD or**≤**0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff.** **for Hg conc.**≤1**μg/dscm Page 3 of 3** **1/18/2011**

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average
Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/21/2010 Start Run Start Time 9:32:00 13:20:00 8:20:00

Run Finish Time 12:47:00 16:31:00 11:25:00 Net Traversing Points 24 24 24 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 180 

### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.436 0.436 0.436 0.436 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.809 0.809 0.809 0.81 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.14 29.09 29.14 

### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.55 1.44 1.43 1.47 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 126.921 126.937 128.166 127.341 

### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 76.89 83.01 75.22 78.38 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 123.797 122.214 124.976 123.662 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 484.8 500.5 486.5 490.6 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 22.82 23.56 22.90 23.09 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 15.6 16.2 15.5 15.7 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.844 0.838 0.845 0.843 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 8.42 8.35 8.99 8.59 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 18.58 18.80 18.54 18.64 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 73 72.85 72.47 72.8 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.09 30.09 30.18 30.12 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.21 28.13 28.29 28.21 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.15 29.11 29.06 29.11 

### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 519 517 508 514 

### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.119 0.111 0.111 0.114



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 26.0 25.2 24.9 25.4 

### A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 8,522 8,204

8,256

8,327 

### Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 19,199 18,609

18,436

18,748 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.0 98.4 100.1 98.1



### W p Production, tons glass per hour 

### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 27.25 8.45 11.25 15.65 

### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 7.8E-03 2.4E-03 3.2E-03 4.5E-03 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-04 7.5E-05 9.8E-05 1.4E-04 

### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.11

Knauf Insulation Lanett, AL 621 Furnace Source Moore Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average
Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 Start Run Start Time 9:52:00 12:15:00 14:35:00

Run Finish Time 10:58:00 13:19:00 15:38:00 Net Traversing Points 24 24 24 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60 

### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.441 0.441 0.441 0.441 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.802 0.802 0.802 0.80 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.98 29.10 29.08 29.05 

### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.58 1.57 1.67 1.60 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 45.982 46.083 46.743 46.269 

### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 84.42 90.46 88.50 87.79 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 43.844 43.636 44.401 43.960 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 150.3 141.6 138 143.3 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.07 6.67 6.50 6.75 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 13.9 13.3 12.8 13.3 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.861 0.867 0.872 0.867 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 9.47 9.30 9.08 9.3 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 19.20 18.86 18.96 19.0 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 71.33 71.84 71.96 71.7 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.28 30.24 30.21 30.25 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.58 28.62 28.65 28.62 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.4 -0.40 -0.50 -0.43 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.95 29.07 29.04 29.02 

### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 521 523 524 523 

### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.123 0.123 0.132 0.126



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 26.2 26.1 27.0 26.4 

### A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 8,675 8,730

9,066

8,823 

### Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 19,340 19,277

19,960

19,525 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.6 96.9 94.7 96.4



### W p Production, tons glass per hour 

### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 900 730 700 777 

### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 7.2E-01 5.9E-01 5.6E-01 6.2E-01 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.4E-02 1.9E-02 1.9E-02 2.1E-02 

### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### W HF Catch Weight, μg 2300 2100 2300 2233 

### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+00 1.7E+00 1.8E+00 1.8E+00 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.0E-02 5.6E-02 6.2E-02 5.9E-02 

### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.11

Knauf Insulation Lanett, AL 621 Furnace Source Starkey Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average
Date Test Date 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 10/19/2010 Start Run Start Time 10:05:00 11:54:00 13:34:00

Run Finish Time 11:19:00 12:58:00 14:36:00 Net Traversing Points 20 20 20 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72 

### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.362 0.362 0.362 0.362 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.806 0.806 0.806 0.81 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.10 29.18 29.08 29.12 

### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.08 1.11 1.10 1.10 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 47.954 51.382 52.365 50.567 

### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 92.90 111.13 116.23 106.75 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 45.242 47.061 47.373 46.559 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 67.7 65.1 67.1 66.6 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.19 3.06 3.16 3.14 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 6.6 6.1 6.3 6.3 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.934 0.939 0.937 0.937 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 2.6 2.8 9.1 4.8 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 18.2 18.0 19.0 18.4 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.20 79.20 71.96 76.79 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.14 29.17 30.21 29.51 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.41 28.49 29.45 28.78 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.06 29.14 29.04 29.08 

### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 797 799 801 799 

### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.204 0.210 0.208 0.207



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.7 38.5 37.9 38.1 

### A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 29.5 29.5 29.5 29.5 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 25,462 26,164

25,568

25,731 

### Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 66,790 68,257

67,103

67,383 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 103.1 106.1 103.4



### W p Production, tons of glass per hour 

### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 7390 12000 12000 10463 

### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 5.8E+00 9.0E+00 8.9E+00 7.9E+00 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.5E-01 8.8E-01 8.6E-01 7.6E-01 

### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 95 975 133 401 

### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 7.4E-02 7.3E-01 9.9E-02 3.0E-01 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.1E-03 7.2E-02 9.5E-03 2.9E-02 

### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 69 176 51 99 

### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 5.4E-02 1.3E-01 3.8E-02 7.5E-02 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.1E-03 1.3E-02 3.6E-03 7.2E-03 

### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.11

Knauf Insulation Lanett, AL 621 Curing Oven Stack Luckett Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith Run Number 1 2 3 Average
Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 Start Run Start Time 10:33:00 12:05:00 14:08:00

Run Finish Time 11:42:00 13:46:00 15:21:00 Net Traversing Points 20 20 20 

### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60 

### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.301 0.301 0.301 0.301 

### C p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.804 0.804 0.804 0.80 

### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993 

### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.18 29.19 29.16 29.18 

### ∆ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.46 1.58 1.48 1.51 

### V m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 45.184 47.214 47.030 46.476 

### t m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 86.42 90.25 85.88 87.51 

### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 42.439 44.064 44.189 43.564 

### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 50.9 57 57.7 55.2 

### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.40 2.68 2.72 2.60 

### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 5.3 5.7 5.8 5.6 

### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.947 0.943 0.942 0.944 

### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.00 0.00 0.00 

### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.80 20.80 20.80 20.80 

### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.20 79.20 79.20 79.20 

### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83 

### M s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.25 28.21 28.20 28.22 

### P g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60 

### P s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.14 29.15 29.12 29.13 

### t s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 95 96 97 96 

### ∆ P avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.255 0.274 0.260 0.263



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 28.0 29.2 28.5 28.6 

### A s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 165.6 165.6 165.6 165.6 

### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 243,585 252,951

246,333

247,623 

### Q aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 277,984 290,089

283,664

283,913 

### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.6 96.8 100.0 98.2



### W p Production, tons of glass per hour 

### W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 117.0 72.0 140.0 109.7 

### C mg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 9.7E-02 5.8E-02 1.1E-01 8.9E-02 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.9E-02 5.5E-02 1.0E-01 8.2E-02 

### E lb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 29 22 26 26 

### C mg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E-02 1.8E-02 2.1E-02 2.1E-02 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.2E-02 1.7E-02 1.9E-02 1.9E-02 

### E lb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 14 7 7 9 

### C mg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-02 5.6E-03 5.6E-03 7.6E-03 

### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O 2 N/A N/A N/A 

### E lb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-02 5.3E-03 5.2E-03 7.0E-03 

### E lb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.11

Knauf Insulation Lanett, AL 621 Forming Stack Luckett Personnel

# APPENDIX B

Production Data

# APPENDIX C

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and

Notes

# APPENDIX D Equipment Calibration Documents

# APPENDIX E Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Method Source Run Date **Start Time**  **End Time**  **O 2**  

### CO **2** 

### 30B 621 Furnace 1 10/19/2010 9:52 11:52 19.20 9.47 **26A 621 Furnace 1 10/19/2010 9:52 10:58 19.20 9.47 316 621 Curing Oven 1 10/19/2010 10:05 11:14 18.2 2.6**  **316 621 Curing Oven 2 10/19/2010 11:54 13:10 18.0 2.8 30B 621 Furnace 2 10/19/2010 12:15 14:15 18.86 9.30**  **26A 621 Furnace 2 10/19/2010 12:15 13:19 18.86 9.30 316 621 Curing Oven 3 10/19/2010 13:34 14:48 18.4 2.6**  **30B 621 Furnace 3 10/19/2010 14:35 16:35 18.96 9.08 26A**  **621 Furnace 3**  **10/19/2010 14:35**  **15:38 18.96**  **9.08 0061 621 Furnace 1 10/20/2010 9:32 12:47 18.58 8.42**  **29 621 Furnace 1 10/20/2010 9:32 12:47 18.58 8.42 316**  621 Forming **1 10/20/2010 10:33 11:42 20.8 0.0 316**  621 Forming **2 10/20/2010 12:05 13:46 20.8 0.0 0061 621 Furnace 2 10/20/2010 13:20 16:31 18.80 8.35**  **29 621 Furnace 2 10/20/2010 13:20 16:31 18.80 8.35 316**  621 Forming **3 10/20/2010**  **14:08 15:21**  **20.8 0.0**  **0061 621 Furnace 3 10/21/2010 8:20 11:30 18.54 8.99 29**  **621 Furnace 3**  **10/21/2010 8:20**  **11:30 18.54**  **8.99 BTEC Job# 10-3990.11**  **Knauf Insulation; Lanett Alabama**AcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight (mg)Run 1130 5.5 5.20 5.510.7Run 2130 5.4 7.60 5.413.0Run 31801.53.901.55.4Blank160 ND NDRDL1 0.5 0.30Method 5 PM Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.11Lanett, AL - 621 LineKnauf InsulationCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)FilterRDL(μg)R1Result(μg)R2Result(μg)R3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit (RDL)(μg)R1(μg)R2(μg)R3(μg)MDLusedAntimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.02.0 2.0 2.0<Arsenic 0.93 0.40 2.1 2.5 ND 2.02.0 2.0 2.0<Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.500.50 0.50 0.50<Cadmium ND 0.10 2.00 1.97 1.26 0.502.00 1.97 1.26Chromium 1.83 0.30 56.00 87.4 44.8 1.554.2 85.6 43.0Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.500.50 0.50 0.50<Lead 4.66 0.20 22.4 28.3 17.1 1.017.7 23.6 12.4Manganese 1.73 0.75 3.8 ND ND 3.83.8 3.8 3.8<Nickel 0.61 0.50 5.3 4.4 ND 2.54.7 3.8 2.5<Selenium 5.00 1.0 12.4 9.9 11.3 5.07.4 5.0 6.3<Knauf InsulationMethod 29 Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.11Lanett, AL - 621 LineCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg] RDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]MDLusedRun 1100030028.0 1.027.25Run 28903009.2 0.98.45Run 399030012.01.011.25Blank H2O270 ND 0.10Blank KOH320 0.80 0.20Method 0061 Lab Results Blank CorrectionSampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.11Lanett, AL - 621 LineKnauf InsulationVolume (mL)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)HydrochloricAcid (μg)HydrofluoricAcid (μg)Run 141090023009002300Run 248073021007302100Run 345070023007002300Blank H20230NDNDBlank H2SO4220 ND NDRDL1200200CorrectedMethod 26A Lab Results Blank CorrectionKnauf InsulationLanett, AL - 621 LineBTEC job # 10-3990.11Sampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010Volume[ml]Formaldehyde[μg]Methanol[μg]RDLPhenol[μg]RDLFormaldehyde[μg]Methanol[μg]Phenol[μg]Blank UFDI 290 ND ND NDRun 1 355 116.5 294ND14117 29 14Run 2 350 72 224ND772 22 7Run 3 400 140 264ND7140 26 7Run 1 304 7390 954697*7390 95 69Run 2 360 12000 9754176712000 975 176Run 33501200013345171200013351621Forming621CuringOvenMethod 316 Lab Results Blank CorrectionCorrectedSampling Dates: October 19-21, 2010BTEC job # 10-3990.11Lanett, AL - 621 LineKnauf Insulation

### Your Project #: 10-3990.11 Site: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/09



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F1923 Received: 2010/10/26, 12:30
Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 SOP-00102 Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/29

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169 Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 5 8 H

P 8 6 6 8 H

P 8 6 8 9 Sampling Date 2010/10/21 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 10:00 13:40 17:00 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 5.5 5.4 0.5 2311260
Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 5.20 7.60 0.30 2312476
Acetone Rinse Volume ml 160 130 130 1 2311266

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 9 0 Sampling Date 2010/10/21 12:00 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.5 0.5 2311260
Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 3.90 0.30 2312476
Acetone Rinse Volume ml 180 1 2311266

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 5 8 H

P 8 6 6 8 H

P 8 6 6 8 H

P 8 6 8 9 Sampling Date 2010/10/21 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 10:00 13:40 13:40 17:00 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RDL QC Batch 1-M5/29 Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.0 2320837
Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.93 0.40 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.0 2320837
Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2320837
Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 2.00 2.00 1.97 0.50 2320837
Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.83 0.30 56.0 56.9 87.4 1.5 2320837
Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 2320837
Total Lead (Pb) ug 4.66 0.20 22.4 22.5 28.3 1.0 2320837
Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.73 0.75 3.8 4.4 ND 3.8 2320837
Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.61 0.50 5.3 5.3 4.4 2.5 2320837
Total Selenium (Se) ug 5.0 1.0 12.4 12.1 9.9 5.0 2320837

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H P 8 6 9 0 Sampling Date 2010/10/21 12:00 U n i t s RUN 3-M5/29 RDL QC Batch

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 2.0 2320837
Total Arsenic (As) ug ND 2.0 2320837
Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.50 2320837
Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 1.26 0.50 2320837
Total Chromium (Cr) ug 44.8 1.5 2320837
Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.50 2320837
Total Lead (Pb) ug 17.1 1.0 2320837
Total Manganese (Mn) ug ND 3.8 2320837
Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 2.5 2320837
Total Selenium (Se) ug 11.3 5.0 2320837

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HP8658 Collected 2010/10/21 Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Maxxam ID HP8668 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Maxxam ID HP8668 D u p Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R

Maxxam ID HP8689 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Maxxam ID HP8690 Collected 2010/10/21 Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2320837 2010/11/05 2010/11/08 N_R Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2311260 2010/10/27 2010/11/02 NUA Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2312476 N/A 2010/11/01 BLM Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2311266 N/A 2010/10/29 NUA

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F1923 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Sample #HP8658-01R negative weight observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except HP8658, due to the matrix (high levels of B) Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HP8668. Trace level Ni and As were observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-3990.11 P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL


### Quality Assurance Report
Maxxam Job Number: GB0F1923

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2311260 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/02 ND, RDL=0.5 mg 2320837 N_R Matrix Spike

(HP8668) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 96 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 99 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 3.1 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 93 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 95 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 2.1 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 91 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 92 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 1.1 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 96 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 97 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 1.0 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 97 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 101 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 4.0 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 96 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 99 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 3.1 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 98 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 99 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 1.0 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 95 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 101 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 6.1 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 94 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 98 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 4.2 % 20 Matrix Spike (HP8668) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 93 % 70 - 130 Matrix Spike DUP (HP8668) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 95 % 70 - 130 MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 2.1 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 1.8 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 98 % 85 - 115

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169
Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-3990.11 P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL


### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)
Maxxam Job Number: GB0F1923

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2320837 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 3.4 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 95 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 0.5 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 0.3 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 97 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 3.0 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 98 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 2.5 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 93 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 3.3 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 97 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 2.9 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 97 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 94 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 3.2 % 20 Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 98 % 85 - 115 Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 96 % 85 - 115 RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 2.3 % 20 Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.40 ug Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.40 ug RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 1.02, RDL=0.40 ug Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 1.00, RDL=0.40 ug RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.30 ug Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.30 ug RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.10 ug RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.20 ug Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.20 ug RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.75 ug Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=0.75 ug RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 1.63, RDL=0.50 ug Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 1.58, RDL=0.50 ug RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=1.0 ug Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169
Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-3990.11 P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF-LANETTE,AL


### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)
Maxxam Job Number: GB0F1923

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2320837 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/08 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/08 1.6 % 20 Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/08 0.5 % 20 Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/08 NC % 20 Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/08 NC % 20
Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 8 of 8

### O hi o Lum ex C o. , I nc

. 9263 R av enna R d.
, U ni t A

- 3 T w i ns bur g, O H 44087 P hone: ( 330) 405- 0837 F ax : ( 330) 405- 0847

w w w

. ohi ol um ex

. c om O t her



## Clie nt Na m e 

# B T E nv i r onment al C ons ul t i ng, I nc

. R epor t N um ber B T E nv i r onm ent al 110110 R epor t



## Date

Con tact Nam e P ho n e

**T**

**r a** 

**p**

**I.D**

**. T**  **est L**  **o cat**  **i o**  **n D**  **at**

**e A n**  **al yze**  **d S**  **ci en**  **t i**  **st M**  **ass n g**  **S ect** 

**. 1**  **M ass n**  **g S**  **ect**

**. 2**  **S p**  **i**

**ke L**  **evel %**  **S p**  **i**

**ke R**  **eco ver**  **y D**  **at**

**e(**

**s)**

**i**

**n S**  **t ack**  **C o**  **mme n**  **t s** 

V a r ia bilit y + - 1 0 % C a libr a t ion R e por t A v a ila ble 

## ( 2 4 8)

- 5 48

- 8 0 72 T u r n - A r o u n d T i m e

S t andar d

48 hour r us h

L ess t h an

. 422 n g i s co n si d er ed " < L D L

. " W h i ch i s l ess t h an t h e l o w est d et ect i o n l i mi t

. 

# S o r b e n t T r a p A n a l y s i s R e p o r t

11/ 1/ 2010
B ar r y B oul i anne bboul i anne@ s bc gl obal

. net M at t hew S mi t h msmi t h @ b t e ci n c. co m 

## Pla nt/Sou rce 

# Lannet t
, A l abama

80257 621 F u r n ace 11/ 1/ 2010 Dr. Q i a o He 499 0 .5 10/ 19/ 2010 RUN 3 Trap B 80258 621 F u r n ace 11/ 1/ 2010 Dr. Q i a o He 498 0 .4 20 10/ 19/ 2010 RUN 3 Trab A 80271 621 F u r n ace 11/ 1/ 2010 Dr. Q i a o He 287 6 .0 10/ 19/ 2010 RUN 1 Trap B

80283 621 F u r n ace 11/ 1/ 2010 Dr. Q i a o He 251 0 .4 20 10/ 19/ 2010 RUN 2 Trap A 80281 621 F u r n ace 11/ 1/ 2010 Dr. Q i a o He 287 1 .0 20 10/ 19/ 2010 RUN 1 Trap A

80277 621 F u r n ace 11/ 1/ 2010 Dr. Q i a o He 261 0 .3 10/ 19/ 2010 RUN 2 Trap B

### Your Project #: 10-3990.11 Site: KNAUF

- LANETTE, AL

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/08



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F2622 Received: 2010/10/27, 12:00
Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/29

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169 Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2622 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/08 Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 8 7 H Q 2 1 8 8 H Q 2 1 8 9 Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 10:00 10:00 14:30 U n i t s R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

Volume ml 270 1 320 1 1000 1 2314624
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.1 0.8 0.2 28 1 2314620

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 8 9 H

Q 2 1 9 0 H

Q 2 1 9 1 Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 14:30 17:15 12:00 U n i t s RUN 1-M0061 RDL RUN 2-M0061 RDL RUN 3-M0061 RDL QC Batch Lab-Dup

Volume ml 1 890 1 990 1 2314624
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 28 1 9.2 0.9 12 1 2314620

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2622 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/08 Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2187 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R.BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2188 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R.BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2189 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2189 D u p Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE

Maxxam ID HQ2190 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2191 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2314620 2010/10/29 2010/10/29 LLE Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2314624 N/A 2010/10/29 FMO

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2622 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/08 Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-3990.11 P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF - LANETTE, AL


### Quality Assurance Report
Maxxam Job Number: GB0F2622

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2314620 LLE Matrix Spike

(HQ2189) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 101 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 101 % 90 - 110 Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 ND, RDL=0.2 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/29 0.6 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5

### Your Project #: 10-3990.11 Site: KNAUF-

LANETTE, AL Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/09



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F2035 Received: 2010/10/26, 12:30
Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/05

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169 Page 1 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2035 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H P 9 2 7 3 H

P 9 2 7 4 H

P 9 2 7 5 H

P 9 2 7 5 H

P 9 2 7 6 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 16:50 16:50 11:35 11:35 13:40 COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-.1N RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 1-H2SO4-M26A 2-H2SO4-M26A Lab-Dup

Volume ml 230 220 410 480 1 2319796 Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 900 930 730 200 2321427 Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2300 2400 2100 200 2321427

ND = Not detected N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H P 9 2 8 2 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 15:55 COC Number N/A

U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch 3-H2SO4-M26A

Volume ml 450 1 2319796 Hydrochloric Acid ug 700 200 2321427 Hydrofluoric Acid ug 2300 200 2321427

N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2035 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HP9273 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9274 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID BLANK-.1N H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9275 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9275 D u p Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID RUN 1-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9276 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID RUN 2-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Maxxam ID HP9282 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID RUN 3-H2SO4-M26A Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2321427 2010/11/05 2010/11/05 A_S Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2319796 N/A 2010/11/05 A_S

Page 3 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2035 Client Project #: 10-3990.11 Report Date: 2010/11/09 Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 4 of 5

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-3990.11 P.O. #: Project name: KNAUF- LANETTE, AL


### Quality Assurance Report
Maxxam Job Number: GB0F2035

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2321427 A_S Matrix Spike

(HP9275) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 93 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 99 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 98 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 102 % 90 - 110 Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 ND, RDL=200 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/05 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/05 0.5 % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burlington:5555 North Service Road, Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H7 Telephone(905) 332-8788 Fax(905) 332-9169

Page 5 of 5

### Your Project #: 10-286B Site: CURING OVEN /

FORMING STACK

Attention: Barry

Boulianne BT Environmental Consulting 2615 Wolcott St. Ferndale, MI USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/15



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F2620 Received: 2010/10/27, 11:40
Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train # Samples Received: 18

Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Formaldehyde (M316) 10 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316 Final Volume of Impinger 10 N/A 2010/11/02 Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) ( 1 ) 10 N/A 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 6 5 H Q 2 1 6 6 H Q 2 1 7 5 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/20 2010/10/19 14:20 15:10 12:00 U n i t s RB-CURINGOVEN-HPLC RB-FORMINGSTACK-HPLC RDL R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 RDL QC Batch

H2O H2O

Formaldehyde ug ND ND 7.3 6600 120 2316899
Volume ml 290 290 1 230 1 2316904

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 6 H Q 2 1 7 6 H Q 2 1 7 7 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 12:05 12:05 13:30 U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 RDL R2-CURINGOVEN-M316 RDL QC Batch Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug 790 790 19 12000 180 2316899
Volume ml 74 1 360 1 2316904

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 8 H Q 2 1 7 9 H Q 2 1 8 0 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 15:00 12:20 12:25 U n i t s R3-CURINGOVEN-M316 RDL R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-M316 RDL R1-FSTACK-IMP3-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 12000 170 110 6.6 6.5 2.4 2316899
Volume ml 350 1 260 1 95 1 2316904

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H Q 2 7 8 3 H

Q 2 7 8 4 Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 14:00 15:45 U n i t s R2-FSTACK-M316 RDL R3-FSTACK-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 72 8.8 140 9.9 2316899
Volume ml 350 1 400 1 2316904

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 6 5 H Q 2 1 6 6 H Q 2 1 6 7 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/20 2010/10/19 14:20 15:10 12:10 U n i t s RB-CURINGOVEN-HPLC RB-FORMINGSTACK-HPLC RDL R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA RDL QC Batch

H2O H2O

Methanol ug ND ND 30 56 4 2314971
Phenol ug ND ND 50 62 7 2314971

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 6 8 H Q 2 1 6 9 H

Q 2 1 7 0 Sampling Date 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 2010/10/19 12:15 13:35 15:05 U n i t s R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA R2-CURINGOVEN-VOA R3-CURINGOVEN-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 39 975 133 4 2314971
Phenol ug ND 176 51 7 2314971

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 1 H Q 2 1 7 1 H

Q 2 1 7 2 H

Q 2 1 7 3 Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 12:30 12:30 12:35 14:05 U n i t s R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA R1-FSTACK-IMP3-VOA R2-FSTACK-VOA RDL QC Batch Lab-Dup

Methanol ug 25 25 ND 22 4 2314971
Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 7 2314971

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H Q 2 1 7 4 Sampling Date 2010/10/20 15:50 U n i t s R3-FSTACK-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 26 4 2314971
Phenol ug ND 7 2314971

ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2165 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID RB-CURINGOVEN-HPLC H2O Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2166 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID RB-FORMINGSTACK-HPLC H2O Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2167 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2168 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2169 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2170 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Page 6 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2171 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2171 D u p Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2172 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP3-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2173 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R2-FSTACK-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2174 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R3-FSTACK-VOA Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC /FID 2314971 N/A 2010/11/08 SPS

Maxxam ID HQ2175 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2176 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Page 7 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2176 D u p Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R1-CURINGOVEN-IMP3-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/08 2010/11/02 LLE

Maxxam ID HQ2177 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R2-CURINGOVEN-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2178 Collected 2010/10/19 Sample ID R3-CURINGOVEN-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2179 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP1+2-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2180 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R1-FSTACK-IMP3-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Maxxam ID HQ2783 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R2-FSTACK-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Page 8 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HQ2784 Collected 2010/10/20 Sample ID R3-FSTACK-M316 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/27

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Formaldehyde (M316) /SPEC 2316899 2010/11/02 2010/11/02 LLE Final Volume of Impinger 2316904 N/A 2010/11/02 FMO

Page 9 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Maxxam Job #: B0F2620 Client Project #: 10-286B Report Date: 2010/11/15 Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK

GENERAL COMMENTS
Sample HQ2165-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=288.8 ml
Sample HQ2166-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=290.6 ml
Sample HQ2167-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2168-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2169-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2170-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2171-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2172-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2173-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml
Sample HQ2174-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN
Formaldehyde (M316): Negative absorbance observed for samples in this job.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 10 of 11

### BT Environmental Consulting Attention: Barry Boulianne Client Project #: 10-286B P.O. #: Project name: CURING OVEN / FORMING STACK


### Quality Assurance Report
Maxxam Job Number: GB0F2620

QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2314971 SPS Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/11/08 100 % N/A Phenol 2010/11/08 106 % N/A Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 108 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 108 % N/A Method Blank Methanol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/11/08 ND, RDL=6 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Methanol 2010/11/08 0 % N/A

Phenol 2010/11/08 NC % 50 2316899 LLE Matrix Spike

(HQ2176) Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 97 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 99 % 91 - 107 Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 ND, RDL=2.5 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Formaldehyde 2010/11/02 0.1 % 20

N/A = Not Applicable Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation.

Page 11 of 11