alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 10(ii)

                        ICF KAISER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                   MEMORANDUM
                                   ----------


TO:      Dick Nason

FROM:    Jim Edwards

DATE:    December 6, 1996

SUBJECT: Employment Terms - Revision of December 2 Note

================================================================================

This note replaces the offer I made in my December 2 note, based upon our
discussion.

     1. You would remain as CFO for the indefinite future.  Our current plan is
     for this to extend at least through the 1996 audit.

     2. If we decide to change CFOs, we will offer you a challenging position at
     a salary of $200,000 per year or more.  In return, you will agree to resign
     from the Board of Directors.

     3. You will be entitled to $200,000 in severance in either of the
     following cases:

     .  We change CFOs and you do not take our job offer, but instead, leave the
        company.
     .  ICF Kaiser has a change-of-control, in which case you would have a 30-
        day window to exercise the right.

     In either case, if you choose to continue with ICF Kaiser, the $200,000
     severance offer expires and changes to the normal SEOSP treatment.

     4.  In either of the two cases above, we will also vest your remaining
     unvested options.

     5. We pay you a $25,000 1996 bonus now.  You agree to buy 5,000 ICF Kaiser
     shares on the open market.  If there is an additional 1996 bonus, it will
     be paid at the normal time (March 1 or so).

     6. You have seen an early draft of the proposed 1997 bonus plan.  If you
     are with ICF Kaiser but not the CFO, we will propose an alternative bonus
     plan.

     7. I agree that we should have a weekly meeting to go over the Finance
     agenda; let's say at 11:30 a.m. on Monday (starting the 16th).
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer**

**Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended**

Pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Arthur O. Whipple, the Vice President ofFinance and Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.                The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

InWitness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 16th day ofMarch, 2006.

| /s/ ARTHUR O. WHIPPLE                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Arthur O. Whipple                                   |   |
| Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will beretained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Kto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

----
# C_2022109EN.01000301.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli — Italy) — YT and Others v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR, Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania

(Case C-282/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clauses 4 and 5 - Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector - Catholic religious education teachers - Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying the renewal of such contracts - Permanent need for replacement staff)

(2022/C 109/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: YT, ZU, AW, BY, CX, DZ, EA, FB, GC, IE, JF, KG, LH, MI, NY, PL, HD, OK

Defendants: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR, Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania

Intervener: Federazione GILDA-UNAMS

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 5 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted, first, as precluding national legislation excluding Catholic religious education teachers in public education establishments from the scope of the rules intended to penalise abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term contracts where there is no other effective measure in the domestic legal system penalising that abuse and, second, as meaning that the requirement to hold a suitability certificate issued by an ecclesiastical authority for the purposes of allowing those teachers to provide Catholic religious education does not constitute an ‘objective reason’ within the meaning of Clause 5(1)(a) of the framework agreement, because that certificate is issued once and not before each school year leading to the conclusion of a fixed-term employment contract.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.

---
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

January 23, 2013

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc.

For an Exemption Ft. Lauderdale, Florida-Mexico City, Mexico

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0013

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carrier representatives below and there 

are no objections to Delta’s application. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be 

granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Sandy Sinnick, Counsel for Alaska

 Robert Wirick, AA

 Robert Cohn, Counsel for Frontier/Republic

 Jonathan Hill, JetBlue

 Bob Kneisley, Southwest

 David Kirstein, Spirit Airlines

 John Fredericksen, Sun Country

 Oracio Marquez, United

 Howard Kass, US Airways

 Pierre Murphy, Counsel for USA 3000

 Barbara Russell, Virgin American

 info@airlineinfo.com
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5901]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Inouye).
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                   Washington, DC, August 2, 2012.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Tom Udall, a Senator from the State of New Mexico, to perform 
     the duties of the Chair.
                                                 Daniel K. Inouye,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. UDALL of New Mexico thereupon assumed the chair as Acting 
President pro tempore.

                   recognition of the majority leader

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements of Encorium Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Numbers 333-139337, 333-138305, 333-115737 and 333-37756) and Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Numbers 333-139628 and 333-44096) of our report dated March 30, 2007, relatingto the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Encorium Group, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Encorium Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 30, 2007
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-09323)  pertaining to the SUGEN,  Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan,  the
SUGEN, Inc. 1994  Non-Employee  Directors' Stock Option Plan and the SUGEN, Inc.
1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8
No. 333-09321)  pertaining to the SUGEN, Inc. Long-Term  Objectives Stock Option
Plan for Senior  Management of our report dated February 7, 1997 with respect to
the  financial  statements of SUGEN,  Inc.  included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.




                                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Palo Alto, California
March  28, 1997
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 17-07

TO: Veterinary Services Leadership Team 

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

FROM: Byron E. Rippke

Director

SUBJECT: Transfer of Availability of Cell Lines from the Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this notice is to notify veterinary biologics manufacturers and other 

interested parties that the Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) will discontinue 

distributing cell lines previously listed in the CVB Reagents Catalog.

II. BACKGROUND

A. The CVB has routinely provided cell lines to veterinary biologics 

manufacturers. Due to lack of resources, cell cultures will no longer be 

produced for distribution by the CVB. Cell lines that will no longer be 

provided include the following: 

1. African Green Monkey Kidney Line (VERO)

2. Bovine Turbinate (Botur)

3. Dog Kidney Primary (DKP)

4. Embryonic Bovine Kidney (low passage from Primary) (EBK)

5. Embryonic Equine Kidney Primary (EEK)

6. Equine Dermis Primary (EQDER)

7. Hamster Kidney Line (BHK21C)

8. Kitten Kidney Primary (KKP)

9. Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK-A)

10. Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK)

11. Marek’s Derived Spleen B-lymphoblastoid (MSB-1)

12. Mouse Synovial (MCCOYS)

13. Porcine Kidney (PK15)

14. SV-40 Virus Transformed Hamster Kidney (SV40)

15. Swine Kidney Primary (SKP)

B. Cell lines are available from commercial sources and from the USDAAPHIS National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL). 

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 17-07

Page 2

III. ACTION 

Biologics firms that wish to obtain cell lines for research purposes should contact 

commercial sources or the NVSL. To obtain cell lines from the NVSL, see the Reagents 

page of the NVSL website (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/labinfo-services/sa_reagents/ct_reagents). 

Additional guidance regarding placing an order is also available by telephone at (515) 

337-6200.

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/APPLICABILITY

This action is effective immediately. Cell lines are currently available from several 

commercial vendors and from the NVSL.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements and in the related prospectuses of our report dated
February 3, 2000 on the consolidated balance sheets of Sky Financial Group,
Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements
of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1999; which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Form S-8 No. 333-67233
Form S-8 No. 333-47315 (Post-Effective Amendment No.1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4)
Form S-8 No. 333-60741 (Post Effective Amendment No.1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4)
Form S-3 No. 333-64127 (Filed as Citizens Bancshares, Inc.)
Form S-8 No. 333-18867 (Filed as Citizens Bancshares, Inc.)




                                  /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

                                      Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 21, 2000
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00080

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.M, A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, B exar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00686 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State’s brief wa s due on April 8 , 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b). On t h e due date, the State filed a first motion for a twenty

- day extension of time to file its brief.

The State’s motion is GRANTED. The State’s brief is due on April 29, 2019

.

_________________________________ Patrici a O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released June 2, 2023)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-22-547 Andrade v. Johnson

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
# C_2009113EN.01001702.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/17

---

Order of the Court of 5 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Provincia di Imperia

(Case C-183/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Conditions governing the admissibility of an action for annulment - Interest in bringing an action - Call for proposals regarding the financing of innovative actions under the European Social Fund - Dismissal - Benefit for the applicant arising from a possible annulment of the contested act)

2009/C 113/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and L. Flynn, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Provincia di Imperia (represented by: K. Platteau and S. Rostagno, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 14 February 2008 in Case T-351/05 Provincia di Imperia v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance declared admissible (but unfounded) the action brought by the applicant, seeking the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2005 to refuse to grant a subsidy in the context of a call for proposals concerning innovative measures under the European Social Fund — Infringement of the conditions governing the admissibility of an action for annulment — The notion of an interest in bringing an action — No benefit for the applicant arising from a possible annulment of the contested act

Provincia di Imperia

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5709]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mrs. DAVIS of California:
       H.R. 6308.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>					<C>
PERIOD-TYPE>		9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>			JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>			MAR-31-1999
<CASH>						0
<SECURITIES>					0
<RECEIVABLES>				2,500
<ALLOWANCES>					0
<INVENTORY>						0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>				3,784
<PP&E>						0
<DEPRECIATION>					0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>				3,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				0
<BONDS>						0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>				0
<PREFERRED>					2,090
<COMMON>					1,572
<OTHER-SE>					3,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		3,784
<SALES>						0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>					2
<CGS>							0
<TOTAL-COSTS>					0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>					56
<LOSS-PROVISION>					0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>				0
<INCOME-PRETAX>				2,221
<INCOME-TAX>					0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			2,221
<DISCONTINUED>					0
<EXTRAORDINARY>					2,275
<CHANGES>						0
<NET-INCOME>					2,221
<EPS-PRIMARY>					(.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>					(.01)


        

</TABLE>
Item_5_1_9a_Camelpox/ page 1

Annex 20

CHAPTER ~~X~~16.Z.INFECTION WITH CAMELPOX VIRUS

**Article ~~X~~16.Z.1.**

General provisions

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, *infection* with *~~c~~Camelpox virus* is defined as an *infection* of dromedary and bactrian camels (hereafter ‘susceptible animals’) with ~~c~~*Camelpox virus*~~of genus *Orthopoxvirus*, family *Poxviridae*~~.

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with ~~c~~*Camelpox virus*:

1)	~~c~~*Camelpox virus* has been isolated and identified as such in a sample from a susceptible animal; or 

2)	characteristic ~~o~~*Orthopox* virions have been observed in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs ~~suggestive of~~consistent with *infection* with ~~c~~*Camelpox virus* or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*; or 

3)	antigen or nucleic acid specific to ~~c~~*Camelpox virus* has been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs ~~suggestive of~~consistent with *infection* with ~~c~~*Camelpox virus*, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*; or

4)	antibodies specific to ~~c~~*Camelpox virus*, that are not the consequence of *vaccination*, have been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs ~~suggestive of~~consistent with *infection* with ~~c~~*Camelpox virus*, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*.

Standards for ~~diagnostic tests~~diagnosis and vaccines, as well as information on the epidemiology, are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*. 

___________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2024	1
# C_2011204EN.01000501.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 May 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-61/08) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Article 43 EC - Freedom of establishment - Notaries - Nationality requirement - Article 45 EC - Connection with the exercise of official authority - Directive 89/48/EEC)

2011/C 204/08

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos and H. Støvlbæk, Agents)

Applicant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Ossowski, Agent)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: V. Christianos, E.-M. Mamouna and A. Samoni-Rantou, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, Agent), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, Agents), Republic of Lithuania (represented by D. Kriaučiūnas and E. Matulionytė, Agents), Republic of Slovenia (represented by: V. Klemenc and Ž. Cilenšek Bončina, Agents), Slovak Republic (represented by: J. Čorba and B. Ricziová, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Breach of Articles 43 and 45 EC and Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16) — National rules making pursuit of the profession of notary subject to a nationality requirement

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 43 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 43 EC;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission, the Hellenic Republic, the Czech Republic, the French Republic, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission, the Hellenic Republic, the Czech Republic, the French Republic, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---