alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2009 – Commission v Luxembourg**

**(Case C‐282/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – Failure to transpose within the period prescribed

1.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification
– Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 10)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 10)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to take or communicate, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  financial  information  from  the Consolidated Balance
Sheets  at  December  31, 1999 and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the
year  ended  December  31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                        3952
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        4399
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              1470
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  26466
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       26466
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           938
<LOANS>                                     148170
<ALLOWANCE>                                   2163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              191229
<DEPOSITS>                                  157996
<SHORT-TERM>                                  6500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2142
<LONG-TERM>                                   7000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      3244
<OTHER-SE>                                   14347
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              191229
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              13676
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1451
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               250
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             15377
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            6086
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            6628
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         8749
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  445
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              22
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               6520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3344
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    3344
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2408
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   5
<LOANS-NON>                                    147
<LOANS-PAST>                                   130
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1827
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  417
<RECOVERIES>                                   308
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             2163
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          2163
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
##### 



ZIX CORPORATION
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
    Definitions
 Disability
 Resignation.
 Retirement
 Term of Option
 1




---



##### 



Exercise of Option .
 Exercise
 Adjustment
 Method of Exercise
   2




---



##### 



Termination of Option
   No Rights as Shareholder .
 3




---



##### 



State and Federal Securities Regulation .
 Modification of Options .
 Withholding of Taxes .
 Continued Employment Not Presumed .
 4




---



##### 



Non-Competition Covenants .
 either either
     5




---



##### 



Option Issued Pursuant to Plan
 No Liability of Option .
 No Assignment .
 Governing Law .
 Entire Agreement .
 6




---



##### 



Notice .
 ZIX CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Bradley C. AlmondBradley C. AlmondVice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer 7




---



##### 



8
# C_2010221EN.01000701.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — British American Tobacco (Germany) GmbH v Hauptzollamt Schweinfurt

(Case C-550/08) (1)

1

(Directive 92/12/EEC - Products subject to excise duty - Importation of raw tobacco not subject to excise duty under the inward processing procedure - Processing into cut tobacco - Movement between Member States - Accompanying document)

2010/C 221/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: British American Tobacco (Germany) GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Schweinfurt

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht München — Interpretation of Articles 5(2) and 15(4) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1) — Cut tobacco subject to excise duty, manufactured in a Member State under an inward processing procedure in the form of a suspension system from raw tobacco which was not subject to excise duty when it was imported into Community territory — Whether, for purposes of applying the duty-suspension arrangements to the intra-Community movement of that tobacco product, an accompanying document drawn up by the consignor in accordance with Article 18(1) of Directive 92/12/EEC is required

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The first indent of the first subparagraph of Article 5(2) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products must be interpreted as meaning that products subject to excise duty (such as manufactured tobacco) which are manufactured from products not subject to excise duty (such as raw tobacco) and imported into the Community under the inward-processing procedure are to be deemed to be subject to duty-suspension arrangements, within the meaning of that provision, even though they have become products subject to excise duty only by virtue of having been processed within Community territory, with the result that they can move between Member States without the administrative authorities being entitled to insist on production of the administrative or commercial document provided for in Article 18(1) of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.03.2009.

1

---
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1090 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1090

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
 Assistance Act to provide eligibility for broadcasting facilities to 
      receive certain disaster assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Information Improvement 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF BROADCASTING FACILITIES FOR CERTAIN DISASTER 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Private Nonprofit Facility Defined.--Section 102(11)(B) of the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5122(11)(B)) is amended by inserting ``broadcasting 
facilities,'' after ``workshops,''.
    (b) Critical Services Defined.--Section 406(a)(3)(B) of the Robert 
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
5172(a)(3)(B)) is amended by striking ``communications,'' and inserting 
``communications (including broadcast and telecommunications),''.

            Passed the Senate September 17, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1090

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
 Assistance Act to provide eligibility for broadcasting facilities to 
      receive certain disaster assistance, and for other purposes.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5627-S5628]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 AUTHORIZING THE PRINTING OF THE 25TH EDITION OF THE POCKET VERSION OF 
                     THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Rules 
Committee be discharged from further consideration of H. Con. Res. 90 
and the Senate proceed to its consideration.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

[[Page S5628]]

  The clerk will report the concurrent resolution by title.
  The bill clerk read as follows:

       A concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 90) authorizing the 
     printing of the 25th edition of the pocket version of the 
     United States Constitution.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the 
concurrent resolution.
  Mr. SCHUMER. I ask unanimous consent that the concurrent resolution 
be agreed to, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, with no 
intervening action or debate, and any statements related to the measure 
be printed in the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 90) was agreed to.

                          ____________________
```
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2009 – Commission v Luxembourg**

**(Case C‐331/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environmental liability – Directive 2004/35/EC – Prevention and remedying of environmental damage

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 8)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 56). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 19 of that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
# C_2019131EN.01002102.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara (Romania) lodged on 24 December 2018 — SC Terracult SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Arad — Serviciul Inspecție Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5 and Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Serviciul de Soluționare a Contestațiilor

(Case C-835/18)

(2019/C 131/27)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Timișoara

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SC Terracult SRL

Respondents: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Arad — Serviciul Inspecție Fiscală Persoane Juridice 5 and Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Timișoara — Serviciul de Soluționare a Contestațiilor

Question referred

Do the VAT Directive (1) and the principles of fiscal neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality preclude, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, an administrative practice and/or an interpretation of provisions of national legislation which prevents the correction of certain invoices and, consequently, the entry of the corrected invoices in the VAT return for the period in which the correction was made, in respect of transactions carried out during a period which was the subject of a tax inspection, following which the tax authorities issued a tax assessment which has become final, when, after the issue of the tax assessment, additional data and information have been discovered which would entail the application of a different tax regime?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
May 2020

There were 8 surveillance inspections conducted at 7 different sites for a total of 50

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to increase in response to the 

warmer air temperatures. Six of the 7 sites with fish in the water remained Category 

1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling. One site was identified as Category 2 

(suspect), will be sampled biweekly, and continues routine harvest. No cages were 

confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

June 2019 123 0 21292

July 2019 123 0 21415

August 2019 96 0 21511

September 2019 101 0 21612

October 2019 90 0 21702

November 2019 93 0 21795

December 2019 91 0 21886

January 2020 81 0 21967

February 2020 78 0 22045

March 2020 55 0 23000

April 2020 50 0 23050

May 2020 50 0 23100
19065

#### State v. Ritchie

Affirmed
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-31425, 333-40603, 333-50625, and
333-67573 on Form S-3; and 333-11549, 333-25925, 333-37137, 333-74769, and
333-30488 on Form S-8 of Fonix Corporation of our report dated February 26,
2002, included in Fonix Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001.


/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 27, 2002
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of
Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




Date:
      July 20, 2009/s/
      William M. Caldwell, IVWilliam
      M. Caldwell, IV, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer)
### CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 40 CFRPart 51, Appendix V, 2.1(g)The State of New Hampshire 

## Department of Environmental Services

Michael P Nolin Commissioner

January 11, 2005 I Hereby Certify: That, in accordance with the provisions of NH RSA541-A:11 and section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, public notice was given specifying that a public hearing was to be held on January 10, 2005 at 9:00 a.m . in Room114of the offices ofthe NH Department of Environmental Services, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH . The notice was published at least 30 days prior to the date of such hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The notice stated that copies of documentation regarding revisions to the State Implementation Plan, specifically the proposed amendment of Env-A 1204 of the NHCode of Administrative Rules, could be examined at the offices of the Department's Air Resources Division. That the public hearing was held on January 10, 2005 at 9:00 a.m . in Room114 of the offices of the NH Department of Environmental Services, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH, in accordance with the public notice. That a complete record of the public hearing held on January 10, 2005 is available on tape at the offices ofthe NHDepartment of Environmental Services, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH . That the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

### c~l 

# (2 C~~



# V' Craig A . Wright, Administrator Stationary Source Management Bureau Air Resources Division

?

P .O . Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-1370 " Fax: (603) 271-1381 " TDDAccess: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 13 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 7822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01426]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9031-4]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 01/09/2017 Through 01/13/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20170011, Draft, APHIS, Other, Revisions to USDA-APHIS 7 CFR 
part 340 Regulations Governing the Importation, Interstate Movement, 
and Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms, Comment 
Period Ends: 05/22/2017, Contact: Cindy Eck 301-851-3892.
EIS No. 20170012, Final, TVA, TN, Bull Run Fossil Plant Landfill, 
Review Period Ends: 02/21/2017, Contact: Anita E. Masters 423-751-8697.
EIS No. 20170013, Final, NPS, CA, Alcatraz Ferry Embarkation, Review 
Period Ends: 02/21/2017, Contact: Brian Aviles 415-561-4942.
EIS No. 20170014, Draft, APHIS, Other, Regulation of the Importation, 
Interstate Movement, and Intrastate Movement of Plant Pests, Comment 
Period Ends: 03/20/2017, Contact: Tracy Willard 301-851-3101.
EIS No. 20170015, Final, USFS, AZ, Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange, Review 
Period Ends: 02/21/2017, Contact: Randall Chavez 928-368-2106.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20160263, Draft, USN, WA, EA-18G ``Growler'' Airfield 
Operations at the NAS Whidbey Island Complex, Comment Period Ends: 02/
24/2017, Contact: Sarah Stallings 757-322-4733.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 11/10/2016; Extending Comment 
Period from 01/25/2017 to 02/24/2017.

EIS No. 20160274, Draft, FHWA, NY, NYS Route 198 (Scajaquada 
Expressway) Corridor Project, Comment Period Ends: 01/25/2017, Contact: 
Peter Osborn 518-431-4127.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 11/25/2016; Extending Comment 
Period from 01/25/2017 to 02/08/2017.

EIS No. 20160319, Draft, BLM, CA, Central Coast Field Office Draft 
Resource Management Plan Amendment for the Oil and Gas Leasing and 
Development, Comment Period Ends: 04/06/2017, Contact: Melinda Moffitt 
916-978-4376.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 01/06/2017; Extending Comment 
Period from 02/21/2017 to 04/06/2017.

    Dated: January 17, 2017.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-01426 Filed 1-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```