alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JANUARY 31, 1997 AND
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           11449
<SECURITIES>                                      7181
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6181
<ALLOWANCES>                                       706
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 24567
<PP&E>                                            8455
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   27362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         52972
<OTHER-SE>                                     (40624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27362
<SALES>                                          18916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18916
<CGS>                                             4345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    28442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (683)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1920
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       146
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         423,207
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,389,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,812,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,323,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,812,316
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,630
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            171,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   171,670
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 839 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 839

   Encouraging the people of the United States to observe ``National 
                             Lobster Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2016

Mr. Poliquin submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Encouraging the people of the United States to observe ``National 
                             Lobster Day''.

Whereas the American lobster is recognized around the world as a prized and 
        flavorful culinary delicacy, and should be so recognized on September 
        25, 2016, as ``National Lobster Day'';
Whereas lobster fishing has served as an economic engine and family tradition in 
        the United States for centuries;
Whereas thousands of families in the United States make their livelihoods from 
        lobster fishing and processing;
Whereas more than 120,000,000 pounds of lobster is caught each year in the 
        waters of the United States, representing one of the most valuable 
        catches in the United States;
Whereas foreign markets for lobster from the United States are booming, with 
        export values having more than doubled since 2009;
Whereas historical lore notes that lobster likely joined turkey on the table at 
        the very first Thanksgiving feast in 1621;
Whereas responsible lobstering practices beginning in the 1600s have created one 
        of the most sustainable fisheries in the world;
Whereas Lobster Newburg was featured at the inaugural dinner celebration for 
        President John F. Kennedy;
Whereas lobster is an excellent source of lean protein and is low in saturated 
        fat and high in vitamin B12;
Whereas lobster has become a culinary icon, with the lobster roll featured at 
        the 2015 World Food Expo in Milan, Italy;
Whereas the White House proudly served lobster at the State Dinner with Chinese 
        President Xi Jinping on National Lobster Day in 2015;
Whereas, on September 24, 2015, steamed lobster was prepared for the visit by 
        Pope Francis to New York;
Whereas lobster is enjoyed at casual beach-side lobster boils and also revered 
        as a delicacy at fine dining restaurants; and
Whereas the peak of the lobstering season in the United States occurs in the 
        late summer: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives encourages the people 
of the United States to observe ``National Lobster Day'' with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the A.C.T. Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, WilliamM. Caldwell, IV, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to A.C.T. Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by A.C.T.Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 
| Date: May 23, 2005          |
|-----------------------------|
|                        |
| /s/ William M. Caldwell, IV |   |
| William M. Caldwell, IV     |
| Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
# C_2021217EN.01000301.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB

(Case C-30/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin - Directive 2000/43/EC - Article 7 - Protection of rights - Article 15 - Sanctions - Action for compensation based on an allegation of discrimination - Defendant acquiescing to claim for compensation without recognition on its part of the discrimination alleged - Connection between the compensation paid and the discrimination alleged - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection - National procedural rules preventing the court seised from ruling on whether there was discrimination as alleged, despite the express request of the claimant)

(2021/C 217/03)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Diskrimineringsombudsmannen

Defendant: Braathens Regional Aviation AB

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 7 and 15 of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as precluding a national law which prevents a court that is seised of an action for compensation based on an allegation of discrimination prohibited by that directive from examining the claim seeking a declaration of the existence of that discrimination where the defendant agrees to pay the compensation claimed without however recognising the existence of that discrimination. It is for the national court hearing a dispute between private persons to ensure, within its jurisdiction, the judicial protection for litigants flowing from Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by disapplying as necessary any contrary provision of national law.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129403 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, CASSANDRA DAVIS, Personal Justices 

Representative of the Estate of ELSIE

BAXTER, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129403 

 COA: 250880 

Oakland CC: 2003-049054-NO 

BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0406 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 13, 2006 

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of OEC Compression Corporation, (formerly Equity Compression Services
Corporation, formerly Hawkins Energy Corporation, the "Company") on Form S-8
(File Nos. 33-74640 and 333-23925) of our report dated March 30, 1998 on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December
31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
 
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 14, 1998
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALADIN RUSHDAN, AKA Woods,

AKA Robert Woods,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

T. PERBULA, Counselor at CMF

Vacaville; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-16911

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00729-GEBKJN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. 

Saladin Rushdan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims in connection with his

attempts to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement. We have jurisdiction

FILED

JAN 12 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16911

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108,

1117 (9th Cir. 2003) (failure to exhaust administrative remedies); Barnett v.

Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) ( Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

dismissal). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record, Valdez v.

Rosenbaum, 302 F.3d 1039, 1043 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

Dismissal of Rushdan’s § 1983 claims was proper because Rushdan failed to

exhaust administrative remedies as to his claims against Ramirez-Palmer, Hall,

Perbula, Stratton, and Dovey. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006)

(holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory and requires adherence to

administrative procedural rules). 

The district court properly dismissed Rushdan’s state law claims for failure

to allege compliance with the California Tort Claims Act as required for any civil

complaint for money damages against a public entity or employee. See Cal. Gov’t

Code §§ 911.2, 945.4; Baines Pickwick Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles, 85 Cal. Rptr.

2d 74, 77 (Ct. App. 1999) (“[T]he claims presentation requirements are not limited

to tort claims, but extend also to claims for money or damages based on

contract.”). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, nor arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 
3 10-16911

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

Rushdan’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021053EN.01001102.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — WEG Tevesstraße v Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen

(Case C-449/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Exemption for leasing and letting immovable property - National legislation exempting from VAT the supply of heat by an association of residential property owners to property owners belonging to that association)

(2021/C 53/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: WEG Tevesstraße

Defendant: Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(l) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2009/162/EU of 22 December 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation which exempts from value added tax the supply of heat by an association of residential property owners to the property owners belonging to that association.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.

---
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA
- 2015 - 0249 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM174AD

MD80
- 28 - 228 --- 9/27/13 MD90
- 28 - 013 --- 9/27/13 MD80 28
- 53 --- 4/8/91 MD80 28
- 63 --- 6/14/91 MD80 28
- 63, R1
--- 7/19/91

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Mark B. Cox, certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Giant Industries,
Inc.; 2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5.     The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2004. By:
    
    
    
    /s/ MARK B. COXName:
    
    
    Mark B. CoxTitle:

    
    
    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.02

                                  CERTIFICATION
                   PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SS. 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
First Quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Fisher Scientific International Inc. (the
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                /s/ Kevin P. Clark
                                -----------------------------
                                Kevin P. Clark
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                Date: May 10, 2005
19824

#### State v. Quiocho

April 17, 1997

Order No. 97-45

Reversed
#### J. A. MAHER, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12759.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 9, 1959.

Pierce, Pierce & Brook, Earl Boyd Pierce, Muskogee, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, J. A. Maher, defendant below, was charged by information in the County Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, with the offense of practicing dentistry without a license. He was tried by a jury, convicted, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and confinement for thirty days in the county jail. Judgment *286and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The information charged, in substance, that the defendant willfully and unlawfully constructed and reproduced a prosthetic denture, also known as a plate, for one I. V. Coburn, after having first made impressions of the gums and teeth and having fitted the same without first having been licensed to practice dentistry under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. This action was brought under the provisions of 59 O.S.1951 § 271, the pertinent part of which reads:

> “Any person shall be regarded as practicing dentistry within the meaning of this Act who shall hold himself out, or employ methods, in any way, representing himself as being engaged in the practice of dentistry; * * * or furnishes, supplies, constructs, reproduces or repairs, or offers to furnish, supply, construct, reproduce or repair prosthetic dentures (sometimes known as plates), bridges or other substitutes for natural teeth, to the user or prospective user thereof; * * * or takes impressions of the teeth and jaws; * *

The state’s evidence is completely in support of the charge in the information, to wit: that the defendant did make a set of upper plates for I. V. Coburn after having taken the necessary impressions, and supplied the same to I. V. Coburn. The record discloses that the defendant had been engaged in the business of dental technician making such plates for fifteen years; seven years in the U. S. Army, and eight years in and around Miami, Oklahoma. The record presents a question of fact for the determination of the jury. It has been repeatedly held:

> “Where there is competent and substantial evidence in the record from which the jury might reasonably conclude that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged, the jury’s verdict will not be interfered with upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.”

Hunt v. State, 81 Okl.Cr. 114, 161 P.2d 82.

This conviction is supported by Shew-maker v. State, Okl.Cr., 329 P.2d 858, and Crosbie v. State, Okl.Cr., 330 P.2d 602, construing and applying the foregoing statute under which this prosecution was brought. The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.