alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6255

DANIEL WEBSTER HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland House of

Corrections-Annex; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner, Maryland Division of Corrections; CHARLES

SMITH, Assistant Warden, Maryland House of

Corrections Annex; MAJOR RAY, 7x3 Shift Commander, Maryland House of Corrections Annex;

PAM SORENSON, Case Manager, Maryland House of

Corrections Annex; GEORGE SHAHINIAN, CCSII,

Maryland House of Corrections Annex; MR.

DIXON, State Treasurer, State Treasurer’s

Office,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-4173-DKC)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Daniel Webster Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Webster Hill appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Hill alleged that prison personnel negligently lost papers he had given them to copy; Hill wanted to submit the

papers with an appeal in another case. Inmates do not have a cause

of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for negligent interference by

prison officials with their right of access to the courts. See

Pink v. Lester, 52 F.3d 73, 74-75 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2009006EN.01001701.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/17

---

Action brought on 20 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-502/08)

(2009/C 6/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and E. Adsera Ribera, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing or, in any event, by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 45 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing or, in any event, by failing to notify them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 45 of that directive;

1

| — | order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2005/60/EC into national law expired on 15 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 309, p. 15.

1

---
# C_2020320EN.01002204.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — QF v Germanwings GmbH

(Case C-816/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/49)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  annual  report of Jordan American Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Periodic
Report"),  I,  W.  Neal  Jordan,  President  and  Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The  Periodic  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:   June 16, 2003                    By /s/ W. Neal Jordan
                                            --------------------

                                     President  &  Chief  Executive  Officer
EX-10.33



 Exhibit 10.33 

ALCOA CORPORATION 

2016 DEFERRED FEE PLAN FOR DIRECTORS 

APPENDIX C 

Terms Applicable to Directors in Canada 

Pursuant to Section 6.6 of the Alcoa Corporation 2016 Deferred Fee Plan for Directors (the “Plan”), the following
provisions apply to participation in the Plan by any Director who is tax resident in Canada. Capitalized terms not defined in this Appendix C have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 

 

			
	C-1.	  	Form of Deferred Investment. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, including without limitation Section 3.5, a Director may not designate any portion of his or her Fees to be deferred and invested in the
Investment Options; however, a Director may designate all or a portion of his or her Fees to be deferred and invested in Deferred Fee RSU Awards, pursuant to Section 3.6 of the Plan.
		
	C-2.	  	Form of Payment. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, including without limitation Sections 3.3 and 5.2(c), a Director may not elect to receive installment payments of Fees deferred into Deferred Fee RSU
Awards under the Plan or of Annual Equity Awards. All Fees deferred under the Plan and all Annual Equity Awards will be paid to the Director in a single lump sum payment following the Director’s separation from service, in accordance with
Section 5.2(a) and (b) of the Plan.
		
	C-3.	  	No Payment upon Unforeseeable Emergency. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, including without limitation Section 5.1 of the Plan, no payment of any Fees deferred under the Plan or of any Annual Equity
Award may be made upon an Unforeseeable Emergency (as defined in Section 2.1(bb) of the Plan).
#### Frank J. Cipolla et al., Appellants, v S.M. Flickinger Company, Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Motion for reargument granted and upon reargument, the memorandum decision dated April 26, 1991 [172 AD2d 1064] is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph: "The money judgment for $677.45 is reversed and defendant is directed to restore that amount to plaintiffs.” Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# C_2009090EN.01000601.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/6

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 November 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Spain) — N.N. Renta SA v Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC), Generalidad de Cataluña

(Case C-151/08) (1)

1

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 33(1) - Definition of ‘turnover taxes’ - Duty on transfers of assets and documented legal transactions)

2009/C 90/09

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña

Parties

Parties

Applicant: N.N. Renta SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC), Generalidad de Cataluña

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Interpretation of Art. 33 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Definition of ‘turnover taxes’ — National duty on capital transfers and documented legal transactions

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 33(1) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the charging of the variable or proportional amount of the duty on transfers of assets and documented legal transactions when it is chargeable on the conclusion of a purchase by an undertaking whose business activity consists of buying and selling immovable property or purchasing immovable property for development or letting.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 21.6.2008.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Glenn
Welstad, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Command Center, Inc. (the
“Company”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March
27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May
      17, 2010/s/
      Glenn WelstadGlenn
      WelstadPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures,  Inc. (the "Company")
of Form 10-Q for the period ending May 1, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Katz, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                                By: /s/ Michael W. Katz
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Michael W. Katz
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    and President
                                                    June 11, 2004
22260

#### Slate v. Mosby

Affirmed
#### H. W. WOODS, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12905.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 30, 1960.

Homer Thompson, Public Defender, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., James W. Bill Berry, County Atty., Okl. County, *447Charles Gregory, Asst. County Atty., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

NIX, Judge.

The defendant, H. W. Woods, was charged by information filed in the district court of Oklahoma County with the offense of robbery with firearms. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to serve 40 years in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

The defendant was charged conjointly with Loyd Mothersed making an assault at and upon Bertha Jager at the Boulevard Cafeteria with a .22 Derringer and robbing her of $1,831 on November 9, 1959. Mrs. Jager serves as secretary, cashier and bookkeeper at the Boulevard Cafeteria and was alone in her office at the time of the robbery. The defendant entered her office with a box under his arm, and closed the door. She asked him to re-open the door, and he came toward her with a gun in his hand. She testified that she shoved him and told him to get out and he hit her on the side of the head with the gun. He told her to lay down on the floor and he picked up the money from the desk. She stated she was struck six times with the gun.

The defendant testified he was arrested on November 24 and identified a statement he had signed on that date.

The case-made was filed on May 9, 1960 and the case was set for oral argument on September 21. No extension of time was requested and no briefs were filed.

Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed and no argument presented, this Court will examine tfye evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed. Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771; Dodge v. State, 78 Okl.Cr. 100, 144 P.2d 124.

Title 21 O.S.A. § 801 states:

> “Any person or persons who, with the use of any firearms or any other dangerous weapons, attempts to rob or robs any person or persons, or who robs or attempts to rob any place of business, residence or banking institution or any other place inhabited or attended by any person or persons at any time, either day or night, shall be guilty of a felony, and, upon conviction therefor, shall suffer punishment by death, or imprisonment, at hard labor, in the State Penitentiary, for a period of time of not less than five years, at the discretion of the court, or the jury trying the same.”

The defendant was given 40 years by the jury.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find there is sufficient evidence against the defendant, and the circumstances are sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilt.

There is no material error apparent in the record. Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the district court is accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

James E. McMahon

(JEMcMahon@LBL.gov)

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards

for Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and

Heat Pumps

September 12, 2001

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02PP
Environmental Impact Analysis:

PURPOSE and METHOD

PURPOSE

- Estimate impacts from new energy efficiency

standards

METHOD

- NEMS-BRS model

III.K. 1

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02PP
Environmental Impact Analysis:

OUTPUT

Impacts from new energy efficiency

standards on

- Quantities of U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide

(CO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from energy

supply systems

- Trading price of SO2

III.K.2

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02PP
Environmental Impact Analysis:

DOE Requests Input from Stakeholders

Are there any other environmentalfactors

the Department should consider?

If so, what additional analytical methods

are appropriate for addressing them?

III.K.3

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02PP
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


In connection with the Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Colin Binny President
(Chief Executive Officer) and Bee Leng Ho, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                 /s/ Colin Binny
                                 -----------------------
                                 President
                                 December 28, 2006


                                 /s/ Bee Leng Ho
                                 -----------------------
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 December 28, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER
31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,049
<SECURITIES>                                     4,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                       658
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,787
<PP&E>                                           6,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,602
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,588
<SALES>                                         13,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,860
<CGS>                                            2,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (204)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (88)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 425 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To authorize the revocation or denial of passports to individuals affiliated with foreign terrorist organizations, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 425 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FTO Passport Revoca3 tion Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REVOCATION OR DENIAL OF PASSPORTS TO INDI5 VIDUALS AFFILIATED WITH FOREIGN TER6 RORIST ORGANIZATIONS. 

7 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to regulate the issue and 

8 validity of passports, and for other purposes’’, approved 

9 July 3, 1926 (22 U.S.C. 211a et seq.), commonly known 

10 as the ‘‘Passport Act of 1926’’, is amended by adding at 

11 the end the following new section: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 4. AUTHORITY TO DENY OR REVOKE PASSPORT. 

13 ‘‘(a) INELIGIBILITY.— 

14 ‘‘(1) ISSUANCE.—Except as provided under 

15 subsection (b), the Secretary of State may refuse to 

16 issue a passport to any individual whom the Sec17 retary has determined has aided, assisted, abetted, 

18 or otherwise helped an organization the Secretary 

19 has designated as a foreign terrorist organization 

20 pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Na21 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

22 ‘‘(2) REVOCATION.—The Secretary of State 

23 may revoke a passport previously issued to any indi24 vidual described in paragraph (1). 

25 ‘‘(b) RIGHT OF REVIEW.—Any individual who, in ac26 cordance with this section, is denied issuance of a passport 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 425 RFS 

1 by the Secretary of State, or whose passport is revoked 

2 by the Secretary, may request a hearing before the Sec3 retary not later than 60 days after receiving notice of such 

4 denial or revocation. 

5 ‘‘(c) REPORT.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of State 

7 refuses to issue or revokes a passport pursuant to 

8 subsection (a), or if, subsequent to a hearing pursu9 ant to subsection (b), the Secretary issues or cancels 

10 a revocation of a passport that was the subject of 

11 such a hearing, the Secretary shall, not later than 

12 30 days after such refusal or revocation, or such 

13 issuance or cancellation, submit to the Committee on 

14 Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and 

15 the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

16 a report on such refusal, revocation, issuance, or 

17 cancellation, as the case may be. 

18 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The report submitted under para19 graph (1) may be submitted in classified or unclassi20 fied form. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 425 RFS 

1 ‘‘(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘pass2 port’ includes a passport card.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5296]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          RECOGNIZING LONG JUMP OLYMPIAN GEORGE KITCHENS, JR.

  (Mr. BARROW asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. BARROW. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize George Kitchens, 
Jr., from Augusta, Georgia, who will be representing our State and our 
Nation at the London Olympic Games beginning tomorrow. George will be 
making his very first Olympic appearance in the men's long jump. A 
former Clemson Tiger All-American athlete, George will be the first 
member of the Tigers long jump team to advance to the Olympic Games.
  The American Olympic team is made up of 530 men and women. For the 
first time in history, this Olympic team will feature more female 
athletes than male athletes. Of the 302 medal events at the Olympic 
Games, the United States will be represented at 246.
  We look forward to watching George win the gold when the men's long 
jump team takes the spotlight on Friday, August 3. I know I speak for 
all of my colleagues in wishing our American Olympic team the best of 
luck in London.

                          ____________________
```