alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth P. Hahn, Vice President of
Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge,
that:

| | (1) | the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the           Annual
Report) to which this statement is an exhibit fully complies           with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act           of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material           respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 4, 2004

| | /s/ William D. Gehl
| | -------------------
| | William D. Gehl    
| | /s/ Kenneth P. Hahn
| | Kenneth P. Hahn
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LINDELL McFADDEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-1675

September 23, 2022

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge.

Lindell McFadden, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# C_2020414EN.01002603.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘ONDO’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

(Case C-943/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/41)

Language of the case: Latvian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2009 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C‐259/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 79/409/EEC – Conservation of wild birds – Preservation and maintenance of habitats – Classification of special protection areas – Prohibition of hunting and capture – Incorrect transposition

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to transpose Article 3(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1) – Defective transposition of Articles 3(2), 4(1), 5 and Article 8(1) of that directive. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to transpose fully and/or correctly the obligations under Articles 3(1) and (2), 4(1), 5 and 8(1) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO TRANSACTION BONUS AND RETENTION AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSACTION BONUS AND RETENTION AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of
January 6, 2017, by and between DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION (the “Company”) and RONALD J. MASCIANTONIO (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a Transaction Bonus and Retention Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2016
(the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Executive is currently eligible to receive a
transaction bonus, provided that such transaction is closed prior to June 1, 2017; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to extend
the closing deadline and the Executive desires to agree to such change. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and
covenants set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows, effective as of the date hereof: 
 1.
Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “‘Approved
Transaction’ means after the Effective Date and prior to January 1, 2018, the consummation of a transaction (or series of related transactions) that is (a) approved by the Board, and (b) results in (i) a sale
of substantially all the assets of the Company, or (ii) a change in control event described in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(i)(5)(v).” 

2. Section 5.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“Expiration of Retention and Transaction Bonuses. Section 2 of this Agreement will expire, and Executive will have no further
rights thereunder, if a Payment Event does not occur prior to June 1, 2017. Section 3 of this Agreement will expire, and Executive will have no further rights thereunder, if an Approved Transaction does not occur prior to January 1,
2018.” 
 3. Except as specifically provided in and modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is in all other respects hereby ratified
and confirmed and references to the Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement, as modified by this Amendment. 
 4. This Amendment
may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has executed and delivered this Amendment and the
Company has caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered by its duly authorized representative, in each case on the date first above written. 
  

			
	DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony M. Romano

		 	Name: Anthony M. Romano
		 	Title: Chief Executive Officer & President
		
		 	 /s/ Ronald J. Masciantonio

		 	RONALD J. MASCIANTONIO
# C_2021481EN.01002002.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Stichting Brein v News-Service Europe BV

(Case C-442/19) (1)

(2021/C 481/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Pabon, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a purported resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), imposed April 7, 1987, upon which the defendant seeks review of a judgment of the same court, rendered May 11, 1979, convicting him of murder in the second degree and kidnapping in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. We deem point one of the People’s brief as a motion for reargument and renewal of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from the purported resentence, which was granted by decision and order of this court, dated June 16, 1988.

Ordered that the People’s motion is granted, and upon renewal and reargument, the order dated June 16, 1988, is recalled and vacated, and the defendant’s motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

After the defendant absconded during jury selection, he was tried in absentia. On May 11, 1979, he was sentenced, in absentia, to consecutive terms of 25 years to life for the kidnapping and murder of Filiberto Orfila. A timely notice of appeal was filed. On October 22, 1979, the appeal was dismissed on motion of the People, because the defendant still could not be found. Leave to appeal from this order was denied by the Court of Appeals *(see, People v Pabon,*48 NY2d 1033).

The defendant was ultimately apprehended eight years later *271on April 3, 1987. On April 7, 1987, the defendant appeared before Justice Browne, who directed that he be remanded to the New York State Department of Corrections to serve the sentence previously imposed on May 11, 1979. Thereafter, on or about April 16, 1987, the defendant moved to reinstate his appeal from the judgment rendered May 11, 1979, which application was denied by order dated May 27, 1987. The Court of Appeals dismissed the defendant’s application for leave to appeal from that order *(see, People v Pabon,*70 NY2d 652).

On or about February 24, 1988, the defendant moved pursuant to CPL 460.30 for an extension of time to take an appeal from a purported resentence imposed April 7, 1987. Based upon his mischaracterization of the proceedings conducted on April 7,1987, as a resentence, his motion was granted.

On this appeal, the defendant improperly seeks review of the original judgment rendered May 11, 1979 *(see, People v Manino,*90 AD2d 777). Further, upon our examination of the minutes of the proceedings of April 7, 1987, which are presented to us for the first time, it is manifest that those proceedings did not constitute a resentence from which an appeal could be taken. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in its entirety, and the order of this court dated June 16, 1988, is recalled and vacated. Kooper, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12290]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Recasting Antiquity: Whistler, Tanagra, and the Female Form” at the Michael C. Carlos Museum, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW, (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of                           ( print page 88696)                        1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-28204 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**Exhibit 10.27**

 

**SECONDAMENDMENT**

**OFTHE**

**SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 2004 RESTRICTED STOCKPLAN**

 

**WHEREAS,** this corporation maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”); and 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Company’s Board of Directors has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the CompensationCommittee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED** that,pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Article VI of the Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the Committee, the Plan be and is hereby amended, effective as of February 1, 2005, by substituting the following for thedefinition of “Retirement” in Article I of the Plan: 

 

“**Retirement**. ‘Retirement’ shall mean the termination of a Participant’s employment after age 55, except in the case of a Just Cause Termination.” 

 

*        *        * 

 

I, W. Granger Souder, Jr., Secretary of Sky Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify that the foregoing is a correct copy of resolutions dulyadopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of said corporation on December 13, 2005, and that the resolutions have not been changed or repealed.
# C_2010011EN.01000401.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 November 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht, Germany) — Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse

(Case C-351/08) (1)

1

(Freedom of movement for persons - Member of the managing board of a company limited by shares governed by Swiss law, director of a branch in Germany - Compulsory membership of the German pension insurance scheme - Exemption from that obligation for members of managing boards of companies limited by shares governed by German law)

2010/C 11/05

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundessozialgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Christian Grimme

Applicant:

Defendant: Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Bundesagentur für Arbeit, BGl Bertil Grimme AG Insurance Brokers

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundessozialgericht — Interpretation of Articles 1, 5, 7 and 16 of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, and of Articles 12, 17, 18 and 19 of Annex I to that agreement (OJ L 114 of 30.04.2002, p. 6) — National legislation requiring a member of a managing board of a company limited by shares governed by Swiss law who manages in Germany a branch of that company to be insured in the German statutory pension insurance scheme, whilst exempting members of managing boards of companies limited by shares governed by German law from that obligation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999 and, in particular, Articles 1, 5, 7 and 16 thereof as well as Articles 12, and 17 to 19 of Annex I thereto, do not preclude the legislation of a Member State from requiring a person, who is a national of that Member State and employed in the territory thereof to join the statutory pension insurance scheme of that Member State, despite the fact that that person is a member of the managing board of a company limited by shares governed by Swiss law when members of the managing board of a company limited by shares governed by the law of that Member State are not obliged to join that insurance scheme.

---

(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.

1

---
EXHIBIT  99.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PW Preferred Yield Fund
II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
and  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  I,  Timothy F. Kelly, Chief Financial Officer of
General  Equipment  Management  II,  Inc.,  general  partner of the Partnership,
hereby  certify  that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

     By:     General  Equipment  Management  II,  Inc.
          Administrative  General  Partner

     By:     /s/  Timothy  F.  Kelly
          Timothy  F.  Kelly
          Chief  Financial  Officer
          General  Equipment  Management  II,  Inc

Date:  November  14,  2002
#### In the Matter of Henry G. McComb, Appellant, v Division of Licensing Services, Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We find that respondent’s denial of petitioner’s application for a real estate broker’s license was mandated by law (Real Property Law § 440-a), and that, in the circumstances of this case, the protections of article 23-A of the Correction Law are unavailable to petitioner *(see,*Correction Law § 751; *see generally, Matter of Sinclair v Division of Licensing of Dept. of State,*96 AD2d 1130, *lv denied*60 NY2d 559).

We have examined petitioner’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J. — Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Services

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary

Biologics

1920 Dayton Ave

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100

United States Department of Agriculture

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 23-14

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants 

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

Veterinary Services Leadership Team 

Geetha Srinivas

Director

Issuance of Licenses

The purpose of this notice is to bring to the attention of interested parties licenses issued and 

terminated between July 01, 2023 and September 30, 2023. These do not include those licenses 

reissued to update pertinent information.

There were no new U.S. Veterinary Biologics Establishment Licenses or Permits (new permittees) 

issued this quarter.

There were no new Product Licenses or Permits (new codes) issued this quarter.

There were no U.S. Veterinary Biologics Establishment Licenses or Permits (Permittees) terminated 

this quarter.

U.S. Veterinary Biological Product Licenses and Permits (codes) were terminated without prejudice 

as follows:

True Name Code Est. Name/No.

Allergenic Extract, Mixed Epidermals 9527.00 ALK-Abello, Inc./Est No. 259

Allergenic Extract, Mixed Inhalants 9524.00 ALK-Abello, Inc./Est No. 259

Allergenic Extract, Mixed Molds 9523.00 ALK-Abello, Inc./Est No. 259

Allergenic Extract, Mixed Ragweed 9522.01 ALK-Abello, Inc./Est No. 259

Allergenic Extract, Mixed Trees 9522.02 ALK-Abello, Inc./Est No. 259

Allergenic Extract, Mixed Weeds 9522.04 ALK-Abello, Inc./Est No. 259

Bovine Rotavirus, Killed Virus A925.U0 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190

Bovine Virus Diarrhea Antigen Test Kit 5A05.50 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190

Bronchitis Vaccine, Mass Type, Live Virus 1231.12 Elanco US Inc./Est No. 196

Bursal Disease Virus Vaccine, Modified Live Virus, Bursal Disease Virus

Antibody, Chicken Origin

3271.U0 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190

Canine Anaplasma Antibody Test Kit 5751.20 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190

Clostridium Botulinum Type C Bacterin-Toxoid 7010.00 Ceva Animal Health, LLC/Est No. 368

Crotalus Atrox Toxoid 8900.01 Hygieia Biological Laboratories/Est

No. 407

Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Antibody Test Kit, Component E036.01 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190D
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 23-14

Page 2

True Name Code Est. Name/No.

Heartworm Antigen Test Kit E018.01 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190D

Mink Distemper-Enteritis Vaccine, Modified Live & Killed Virus, Clostridium

Botulinum Type C Bacterin-Toxoid

4929.31 Ceva Animal Health, LLC/Est No. 368

Mink Enteritis Vaccine, Killed Virus, Clostridium Botulinum Type C BacterinToxoid

4955.21 Ceva Animal Health, LLC/Est No. 368

Mink Enteritis Vaccine, Killed Virus, Clostridium Botulinum Type CPseudomonas Aeruginosa Bacterin-Toxoid

49A5.23 Ceva Animal Health, LLC/Est No. 368

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antibody Test Kit 5003.20 Zoetis Inc./Est No. 190

There were no Product Licenses or Permits (codes) issued due to an acquisition this quarter.