alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         839,759  
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,364,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,204,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0        
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,519,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,204,359
<SALES>                                        0      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               283,316
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               64,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                219,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            219,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   219,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .41
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                       405
<INVENTORY>                                      7,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,983
<PP&E>                                          61,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,301
<BONDS>                                         12,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,007
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           661
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,953
<SALES>                                         38,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,176
<CGS>                                           26,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,766
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23







</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ralph
Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of Command Center, Inc.  (the
"Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March
27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:    
August 10, 2009





/s/Ralph PetersonRalph
      PetersonChief
      Financial Officer





10-Q


Page
23
#### Lowicki, Appellant, *v.*Filner et al.

Argued April 15, 1943.

Before Keller, P. J., Bald-rige, Stadteeld, Rhodes, Hirt, Kenworthey and Reno, JJ.

The facts are stated in the opinion by Dithrich, J., of the lower court, Dithrich, Ellenbogen and Kennedy, JJ., as follows:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board terminating an award of compensation to claimant, a widow, on the ground that she has remarried.

The board found as a fact that she had entered into a common law marriage with one Marshall Schaney since the death of her former husband. The evidence as to cohabitation and reputation was overwhelming, and evidence of cohabitation and reputation is sufficient to sustain a presumption of marriage.

In *Murdock’s*Estate, 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 275, chiefly relied on by claimant, although the court there held that proof of the marriage had not been established because of the absence of verba de praesenti, the court rather significantly said:

“Notwithstanding the divergent testimony, there was *314probably sufficient evidence, if believed, to sustain a presumption and a consequent finding that the parties were married, if the evidence had been confined to cohabitation and reputation.”

But the evidence was not confined to cohabitation and reputation as it was in this case. There the claimant undertook to prove the precise form of the marriage contract and in so doing she herself proved that no Valid contract was actually entered into. Here, there was nothing but a flat denial by claimant that she had ever lived with Schaney as his common law wife, and that denial was in -the face of incontrovertible testimony that she bore him a child, stated for the purpose of the birth certificate that the child was legitimate, lived with Schaney in rooms for which -he paid the rent over a period of three years (she testified that they occupied separate bedrooms); purchased groceries and had her two children by her first marriage also purchase groceries on an account opened in his name; and made application for and received public assistance as his wife on three separate occasions, one of them being five months before the child she bore him was born. As the referee aptly said: “She represented herself as Mrs. Lowicki for purposes of compensation and Mrs. Schaney for purposes of relief.”

Claimant having offered no testimony other than her own, which is simply incredible, to overcome the presumption of marriage raised by the evidence of cohabitation and reputation, the board could not have done otherwise than to have found as a fact that her marital status had changed since the death of her first husband and concluded that she was no longer entitled to receive compensation as his -widow.

*H. L. Abrams,*for appellant.

*315
      *James J. Burns, Jr.,*for appellees.

April 19, 1943:

Pee Curiam,

'The judgment of the eourt •'below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Ditheich.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Bonham, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: December 9, 2010
/s/ STEVEN D. BONHAMSteven D. BonhamChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
# C_2020320EN.01002303.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — GDVI Verbraucherhilfe GmbH v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-918/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/52)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6990

ANTHONY MOORE,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN TIMOTHY STEWART,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02440-GJH)

Submitted: December 20, 2017 Decided: January 9, 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly O. Hayes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Moore, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion to reconsider. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Moore has failed to satisfy his burden 

of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an inadequate or ineffective means of 

challenging the validity of his detention. See Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 

2010); United States v. Poole, 531 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008). As such, the district 

court lacked jurisdiction over Moore’s petition. Rice, 617 F.3d at 807. Accordingly, we 

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s orders. However, 

we modify the dismissal order, Moore v. Stewart, No. 8:15-cv-02440-GJH (D. Md., filed 

Sept. 15, 2016 & entered Sept. 16, 2016), to reflect a dismissal without prejudice for lack 

of jurisdiction, and affirm the dismissal as modified, 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q (the "Report") of Amaru,
Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Colin Binny, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



/s/ Colin Binny
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2009
# C_2009141EN.01003402.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-112/08) (1)

1

2009/C 141/62

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 24.5.2008.

1

---
# C_2009069EN.01003204.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 January 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Málaga — Spain) — Finn Mejnertsen v Betina Mandal Barsoe

o

(Case C-148/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 69/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
29, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                              57
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      447
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1082
<PP&E>                                            1215
<DEPRECIATION>                                     371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1926
<SALES>                                           5965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5965
<CGS>                                             4670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (316)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (316)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40894 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. DIANA N. ALANIZ; SALOME A. PALOMO, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(CR-B-95-112-02)

_________________________________________________________________ October 23, 1996 Before KING, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Diana N. Alaniz and Salome A. Palomo appeal their judgments of conviction for unlawful disclosure of confidential information in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1905. Alaniz and Palomo argue that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions, and Palomo further argues that the district court constructively amended the indictment in its jury instruction. We have reviewed2

the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Alaniz and Palomo guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Bell , 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), aff'd , 462 U.S. 356 (1983). There was no constructive amendment to the indictment because the requested addition to the jury charge was not an element of the offense. United States v. Arlen , 947 F.2d 139, 144 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 503 U.S. 939 (1992).
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0259]


Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Random drug and alcohol testing percentage rates of covered 
aviation employees for the period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 15, 2023, the Federal Aviation Administration 
(FAA) published a correction to the Random Drug and Alcohol Testing 
Percentage Rates of Covered Aviation Employees for the Period January 
1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. In that document, the FAA inadvertently 
provided the incorrect docket number in the heading and corrections 
sections. This document corrects that error.

DATES: This correction is effective December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, 
Program Policy Branch; Email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f0e6e1f3f5f6f5e0f1f9f1fae0d4f2f5f5baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cf8eee9fbfdfefde8f9f1f9f2e8dcfafdfdb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>; Telephone (202) 
267-8442.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 15, 2023, the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) published the Random Drug and Alcohol Testing 
Percentage Rates of Covered Aviation Employees for the Period January 
1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; Correction. In the heading and 
corrections section of the document, the docket number appeared as 
``Docket Number FAA-2023-25488'' instead of ``Docket No. FAA-2013-
0259.'' This document corrects that error.

Correction

    On page 87046 of the Federal Register, Vol. 88 No. 240, published 
December 15, 2023, in the second and third columns, the following 
correction is made to the second line of the Heading and thirteenth 
line of the Corrections section.

Docket No. FAA-2013-0259

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Nancy Rodriguez Brown,
Director, Drug Abatement Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-28124 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, WilliamM. Caldwell, IV, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: July 14,  2008 | /s/ William M. Caldwell,  IV                     |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                       | William M. Caldwell, IV                          |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer  and Principal Financial |
|                       | Officer                                          |

 

----