### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 01 31 -C R

______________________________ MI CHAEL

CHARL ES FUL L ER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appea l from the 6th J udicial District Court

L amar County , Texas Trial Court No. 18771

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Carte r2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Michae l Cha

rles Fuller appea ls from his convictions by a jury of indec ency

with a child by
c on ta c t ( c ount o ne ), ind e c e nc y wi th a c hil d b y e xpos ur e (c ount t

wo ), and se xua l a ssa

ult of a c hil d (count three). See T EX . P EN A L C ODE ANN . § 21.11 (Ve rnon 2003), § 22.011 ( Ver non Supp. 2008). Th e jur y a sse sse d his punis hme nt a t fi ft e e n y e ars ' imp ri so nme nt on c ount on e , five y ears ' imp ri so nme nt o n c ount t

wo (t o r un con sec uti ve to t

he se nte nc e in c ount o ne ), and fi ft e e n y e a rs ' imprisonment on count three ( to run conc urre ntly with the sentenc es in counts one and two). Fuller
wa s r e pr e se nte d b y

a pp oin te d c ouns e l a t tr ia l and on app e a l. F ull e r' s atto rn e y ha s f ile d a br ie f i n which he c oncludes that the a ppeal is fr ivolous and without mer it, a fter a revie w of the rec ord and the re lated law. Counsel states that he has s t u d i ed the r ecor d and finds no er ror pr eser ved for appea l that could be suc cessf

ully argued
. The brie f conta ins a profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord and advanc es nine arguable g rounds for revie w. This me ets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 38 6 U .S. 73 8 ( 19 67 ); Sta

ffo rd v . S tat e , 813 S.W .2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); and Hi gh v . S tat e , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [ Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel mailed a copy

of the brie f to Fuller

on J anuar y 15, 2009, informing Fuller of his rig ht to examine the entire a

ppell ate r ecor d and to file a pro se r esponse. Counsel simultaneously filed a motion with this C ourt seekingto withdraw a s counsel in this appea l. Fuller f iled his response on May 13, 2009.Since we ag ree this c ase prese nts no reve rsible err or, we also, in a ccor dance with An de rs , 1 g ra nt co un se l' s r e qu e st t o w ith dr aw f ro m f ur the r r e pr e se ntatio n o f F ull e r i n th is c a se . N o s ub sti tut e counsel will be a

ppointed. Should Fuller wish to seek further review of t his case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appea ls, Fuller must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discre tionary revie w or F uller must f

ile a pro se petition f

or discretionar

y revie w. Any

petition for discre tionary revie w must be filed within thirty d ay s fr o m t h e date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for re he ari ng that wa s o ve rr

ule d b y thi s Co ur t. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discre tionary revie w m ust be filed with this Court, afte r which it will be forwa rded to the Te x as Court of Criminal Appea ls along with the rest of the filings in this case
. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 68.3. Any petition for discretionar

y revie w should comply

with the require men t s o f Rule 68.4 of the Te x as Rules of Appellate Proc edure
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.4. 3 We have de termined that this appea l is wholly frivolous. We have inde pendently revie wed the c le rk ' s re c or d a

nd the re po rt e r' s r e c or d, and we a g re e that no argua

ble iss ue s su

pp or t an a pp e a l. Se e Bl e ds oe v . S

tat e , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We a ff ir m th e jud g me nt o f t

he tr ia l c ourt
. 1

J ack Ca rter J ustice Date Submitted: J une 3, 2009 Date D ecide d: J une 4, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh