alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>


Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q/A-1 (the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Colin Binny, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Colin Binny
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
April 30, 2009
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the ***

Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA GUADALUPE PEREZVAZQUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71858

Agency No. A089-621-105

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2012** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN, District

Judge.*** 

Maria Guadalupe Perez-Vazquez petitions for review of a final order of

removal denying cancellation of removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals held

FILED

FEB 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
The “catchall” provides, “[t]he fact that any person is not within any of the 1

foregoing classes shall not preclude a finding that for other reasons such person is

or was not of good moral character.” Id.

We decline to consider the remaining arguments made by petitioner and the 2

government. Moreover, the scope of our review is limited to the grounds actually

relied on by the BIA. See Santiago-Rodriguez v. Holder, 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th

Cir. 2011).

2

that Perez-Vazquez’s 2002 California Welfare and Institutions Code § 10980(c)(2)

“felony” welfare fraud conviction was an adverse factor that weighed against good

moral character under the “catchall” sentence of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f). However, the 1

conviction was not a felony. It was reduced to a misdemeanor at sentencing

pursuant to California Penal Code § 17(b)(3). The Board was bound by the state’s

characterization of the crime as a misdemeanor. Garcia-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 334

F.3d 840, 845 (9th Cir. 2003). Therefore, we remand for the BIA to reconsider its

good moral character determination.2

PETITION GRANTED AND REMANDED.
M13003 

Process Flow Diagram CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1365]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    HONORING REV. WILLIAM F. HARRELL

                                  _____
                                 

                           HON. PAUL C. BROUN

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Mr. BROUN of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to a 
Southern Baptist minister in Georgia's Tenth Congressional District, 
Rev. William F. Harrell. After serving as Senior Pastor of Abilene 
Baptist Church for the past 31 years, Rev. Harrell, or Brother Bill, as 
he is lovingly referred to by his church congregation, is entering 
retirement.
  Under his leadership, Abilene Baptist has grown to nearly 2,900 
members, and the ministry includes a region-wide television program, 
entitled ``Strength for Today.'' Its building stands as a stunning 
landmark, and the reputation of its members is a powerful testimony to 
the greatness of God. The church's success and strength is due, in 
large part, to Rev. Harrell's faithfulness and care in serving the 
community of the Central Savannah River Area and first and foremost, 
our Lord Jesus Christ. He has served a total of 39 years in ministry, 
holding a number of positions in the Augusta Baptist Association, 
Georgia Baptist Convention, and the Southern Baptist Convention.
  For this reason, and on the occasion of his retirement, it is my 
honor to acknowledge Rev. Bill Harrell, for his outstanding career and 
significant contributions to Christian ministry. Furthermore, I extend 
my sincere appreciation to a servant leader in whom I value his 
friendship and hold in the highest regard. Rev. Harrell is a man who is 
certain of his calling, consistent in his ministry, and committed to 
doing the work of the Lord.
  Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the United States Congress, I applaud the 
great work of Rev. William Harrell and congratulate him on the occasion 
of his retirement.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Role of Tau Oligomer Polymorphism in Alzheimer's Disease and 
Related Disorders.
    Date: March 6, 2024.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Nesar Uddin Akanda, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on 
Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2E405, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, (301) 594-8984, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#224c475143500c4349434c4643624c4b4a0c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6c8c3d5c7d488c7cdc7c8c2c7e6c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28023 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
September 2022

There were 9 surveillance inspections conducted at 9 different sites for a total of 74

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures remained steady. Routine harvest continued.

All sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly 

sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

October 2021 84 0 24272

November 2021 89 0 24361

December 2021 80 0 24441

January 2022 80 0 24521

February 2022 90 0 24611

March 2022 98 0 24709

April 2022 69 0 24778

May 2022 55 0 24833

June 2022 104 0 24937

July 2022 120 1 25057

August 2022 81 0 25138

September 2022 74 0 25212
Opinion issued November 22 , 2022

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 21

- 00272

- CV

——————————— IN RE JOYCE COLUMBUS , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamu s

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Joyce Columbus, challenges the trial court’s order denying relator’s
motion for partial summary judgment. 1

We deny the petition. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8. Any pending motions are

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, L andau, and Farris.

1 The underlying case is Bishop Kindle v. Joyce Columbus, Trustee of the WNB Family Trust, Joe G. Bax, and Patrice Michel Bax , cause number 035118 , pending in the 12th District Court of Grimes County, Texas, the Hon orable David Moorman presiding.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1200
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker at noon.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2007247EN.01003901.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/39

---

Action brought on 29 August 2007 — Patrick Holding v OHIM — Cassera (PATRICK EXCLUSIVE)

(Case T-327/07)

(2007/C 247/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Patrick Holding ApS (Fredensborg, Denmark) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cassera SpA (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision taken by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 28 June 2007 in Case No R 727/2006-2 be annulled and the defendant be ordered to register the contested trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision taken by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 28 June 2007 in Case No R 727/2006-2 be annulled and the defendant be ordered to register the contested trade mark;

| — | the defendant pays the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

the defendant pays the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘PATRICK EXCLUSIVE’ for goods in class 25 — application No 3 063 427

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Cassera SpA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community, national and international figurative marks and word marks ‘G. PATRICK’ for goods in classes 24 and 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---
**Exhibit 10.1**

**NewHire Authorization—Updated Appendix**

Stock options covering anaggregate of 60,000 shares of common stock were granted to onenon-executive officer employee on September 25, 2006.  The grantwas made under the Company’s New Hire Authorization as an inducementto entering into employment with the Company.  All options granted includea ten-year duration and an exercise price equal to the closing price ofDendrite’s stock on the business day immediately preceding the date of grant.The vesting schedule for the options is as follows: (i) twenty-five percent(25%) of the options shall first become exercisable on the first anniversary ofdate of grant and (ii) the remaining seventy-five percent (75%) shall becomeexercisable pro rata over the following three (3) year period, on a monthlybasis, commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and ending onthe fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

----
# C_2020161EN.01001202.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-298/19) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/676/EEC - Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources - Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations - Non-compliance - Article 260(2), TFEU - Pecuniary penalties - Lump sum)

(2020/C 161/17)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Skandalo, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 23 April 2015 in Commission v Greece (C-149/14, not published, EU:C:2015:264), by the expiry of the period prescribed in the letter of formal notice sent by the European Commission, namely 5 December 2017, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 23 April 2015 in Commission v Greece (C-149/14, not published, EU:C:2015:264), by the expiry of the period prescribed in the letter of formal notice sent by the European Commission, namely 5 December 2017, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 3 500 000, to an account to be indicated by it. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 3 500 000, to an account to be indicated by it.

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
**Exhibit 31.01**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Patrick W. Cavanagh, certifythat:

     1. I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K of Williams Controls Inc.;

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

     4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

     b) Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation offinancial statements in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples. 

     c) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

     d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors: 

     a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

     b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December      11, 2008   /s/ PATRICK W. CAVANAGH  Patrick W. Cavanagh    Chief      Executive Officer  
64
19546

#### United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. Lepere

Reversed in part, Affirmed in part
#### Laurel J. Elten, Respondent, v Ronald Elten, Appellant.

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered December 19, 1989, as permitted him Tuesday visitation with his *235children only during the weeks in which he did not have weekend visitation.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing and determination as to whether the parties reached an agreement with respect to the appellant’s visitation with his children on Tuesday nights, and, if they did reach such an agreement, whether their stipulation was intended to give the appellant visitation every Tuesday night or just on Tuesday nights during those weeks in which he does not have weekend visitation.

It is unclear from the record on appeal and from the rather ambiguously-worded stipulation, whether the parties reached an agreement on the appellant’s Tuesday night visitation, and, if an agreement was reached, the precise terms of the agreement. The matter is therefore remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing in which the parties’ agreement, if any, is to be ascertained. If no agreement was reached, there must be a hearing to determine visitation in accordance with the best interests of the child. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, et al.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00459-CV

Trial court case number: 2003-53712

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

On August 11, 2014, the parties filed an “Agreed Motion to Extend Time for 

Mediation and Agreed Motion for Stay of Appeal.” In their motion, the parties request 

an extension of the deadline for mediating this case until September 29, 2014, the 

mutually-agreeable date for their mediator, Alice Oliver Parrott, to extend the deadline to 

report the results of mediation until October 1, 2014, and to extend the deadline for filing 

appellant’s brief until October 29, 2014. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, the parties shall conduct the mediation in this case no later than 

September 29, 2014. Further, no later than October 1, 2014, the parties and the mediator 

shall advise the Clerk of this Court in writing whether the parties did or did not settle the 

underlying dispute, and the mediator shall file with the Clerk of this Court a completed 

“Appointment and Fee Report—Mediation” form, which can be downloaded from the 

forms page of the Court’s website.

Further, we order appellant to file his brief no later than October 29, 2014. No 

further extensions of time for the filing of appellant’s brief will be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

Appellee’s brief, if any, will be due within 30 days after appellant’s brief is filed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 19, 2014
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Bonham, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: March 5, 2010
            /s/ STEVEN D.
      BONHAMSteven D. BonhamChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
# C_2019363EN.01003602.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/36

---

Order of the General Court of 3 September 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Carrefour (Representation of crossed lines)

(Case T-424/18) (1)

(2019/C 363/46)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---