alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.19




 Exhibit 10.19 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO
SURFACE RIGHTS LEASE 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SURFACE RIGHTS LEASE (the “Amendment”), effective
March 31, 2016, is by and between RAMACO CENTRAL APPALACHIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lessor”), and RAMACO RESOURCES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Lessee”).

 Recitals 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee entered into that certain Surface Rights Lease dated August 20, 2015, as amended by that certain
Amendment No. 1, effective December 31, 2015 (the “First Amendment,” and as amended, collectively, the “Surface Rights Lease”); and 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to modify certain terms of the Surface Rights Lease pursuant to this Amendment. 

Agreement 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar cash-in-hand paid, the mutual agreements between the parties, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following:

 1. First Amendment Superseded. The First Amendment is hereby superseded and of no further force and effect. 

2. Base Rent. The first paragraph of Section 3.01 of the Surface Rights Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety, and replaced with
the following paragraph: 
 Lessee shall pay to Lessor a minimum monthly rental (the “Base Rent”), in arrears, calculated as
follows. Beginning with calendar month immediately following the earlier of (i) July 20, 2016, or (ii) the date that Lessee enters into a credit facility, or receives other debt or equity financing, to provide substantial funding for
the construction of the Plant, then, for such month and the succeeding twenty-three (23) consecutive calendar months thereafter, Lessee shall pay the Base Rent of Forty-One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Seven and 00/100 Dollars ($41,667.00) per
month; and, for each calendar month thereafter for so long as this Lease remains in effect, the Base Rent of Eighty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Three and 00/100 Dollars ($83,333.00) per month. Payments of Base Rent shall be paid on or before
the twentieth (20’1’) day of the next succeeding calendar month following the month for which such Base Rent is accrued. 

  
 Page 1 of 2










 Lessee shall provide written notice to Lessor within three days following the occurrence of the
condition in clause (ii) above. 
 3. No Other Modifications. All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall continue to
remain in full force and effect, notwithstanding this Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties acknowledge their agreement to
the foregoing Amendment by causing their duly authorized representatives to sign below: 
  

			
	LESSOR:
	
	 RAMACO CENTRAL APPALACHIA, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	/s/ Randall W. Atkins
	Name:	 	Randall W. Atkins
	Its:	 	Authorized Agent
	
	LESSEE:
	
	 RAMACO RESOURCES, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael D. Bauersachs
	Name:	 	Michael D. Bauersachs
	Its:	 	Authorized Agent



  
 Page 2 of 2
DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 12, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-09-00416-CV
MARK MCCAY, DECO-DENCE L.L.C., AND EDWIN C. OLSEN IV, Appellants V. THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC., LEE HANCOCK,

FRANCES ANN GIRON, DENTON PUBLISHING CO., MARK D. CORNEWETT, AND COWLES & THOMPSON, P.C., Appellees
On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07-08599-E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang Opinion by Justice Francis In an order dated January 23, 2014, the Court reinstated this appeal having received
notice that the bankruptcy proceeding involving one of the appellants had been closed. We
ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file , by February 24, 2014, either the clerk’s record
or written verification that appellants had not requested its preparation or made payment
arrangements. We cautioned appellants that if the Court received writt en verification of no
request or no payment, we would dism iss the appeal without further notice.
On February 24, 2014, the Court received writ ten verification from the Dallas County
District Clerk that appellants ha d not requested the cler k’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss the–2– appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b).

090416F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

MARK MCCAY, DECO-DENCE L.L.C., AND EDWIN C. OLSEN IV, Appellants

No. 05-09-00416-CV V.

THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC., LEE HANCOCK, FRANCES ANN GIRON, DENTON PUBLISHING CO., MARK D. CORNEWETT, AND COWLES & THOMPSON, P.C., Appellees On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 07-08599-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices Moseley and Lang, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellees, THE DALLA S MORNING NEWS, INC., LEE HANCOCK, FRANCES ANN GIRON, DENTON PUBLISHING CO., MARK D. CORNEWETT, AND COWLES & THOMPSON, P.C., r ecover their costs of this appeal from appellants, MARK MCCAY, DECO-DENCE L.L.C., AND EDWIN C. OLSEN IV.

Judgment entered March 12, 2014

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
# C_2010100EN.01000302.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X Holding B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-337/08) (1)

1

(Articles 43 EC and 48 EC - Tax legislation - Corporation tax - Tax entity consisting of a resident parent company and one or more resident subsidiaries - Taxation of profits at parent-company level - Exclusion of non-resident subsidiaries)

2010/C 100/04

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X Holding B.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 43 EC and 48 EC — Legislation permitting resident parent companies to form a single entity, for tax purposes, with one or more resident subsidiaries, resulting in the taxation of the parent company in respect of the profits of that entity — Exclusion of non-resident subsidiaries from that arrangement

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 43 EC and 48 EC do not preclude legislation of a Member State which makes it possible for a parent company to form a single tax entity with its resident subsidiary, but which prevents the formation of such a single tax entity with a non-resident subsidiary, in that the profits of that non-resident subsidiary are not subject to the fiscal legislation of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.

1

---
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PETITION FOR EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN 

REQUIREMENTS OF 14 C.F.R. PARAGRAPH 61.160 THAT WILL ALLOW JACKSONVILLE 

UNIVERSITY TO SEEK AUTHORITY TO CERTIFY GRADUATES FOR AN AIRLINE 

TRANSPORT CERTIFICATE WITH REDUCED AERONAUTICAL EXPERIENCE 

PETITIONER: JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY 

2800 University Blvd. N. 

Jacksonville, FL 32211 

(904) 256-7895 

ckendal@ju.edu 
While this process may take some time. \\C do not want to put an udd

t

o

y 

graduutcd. current and future students. We w:mt students to take advantage of the strong uviation 

curriculum and training that arc prm·itkd in our program while we obtain this certilicatc. This bl!ing said. 

\\C arc requesting. that this exemption be accepted \\ith the condition that Jt~cksonvillc University t~pply and receive an FAA Part I--ll training certilicatl! \\ithin :24 calendar months. 

Please contact Chad Kendall. lntl!rim Co-Director of Jacksonville University's Davis Av iation Center. at 

(904) :256-7895 or I!-mail at cl-4-!ndal aju.edu. if you have and questions or nl!ed additional in formation. 

Sincl!rcly. 

Cht~d Kendal I 

Interim Co-Director 

Davis Aviation Center 

Jacksonville University 

Cc: Dr. Don Capenl!r. Dean. Davis College of Business 

Dr. Wen) ing Xu. Chief Academic Oflicer
### SERVED: AUGUST 28,2012 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC INTHE MATTEROF STEPHEN GUNNER GAMA FAADOCKET NO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA'-2012-0871 

### NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

### 1: IS

This proceeding(heretofore designated as Case No. 2012WP250023) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment
- Service List

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY FeP,eral Aviation Administration 800 IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 . WilburWright Building-·Suite 2Wl000 1 Stephen Gunner Gama, 

### Respondent 1958Country Club Ct., Apt. A Marysville, CA95901 

### ONE COPY

Lindsey M. Nakamura, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, A WP-7.11 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7138 FAJ<: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAJ<: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0871 (Civil Penalty Action)



# ..

. 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Fedetal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D787]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR FRIDAY,

                             JULY 27, 2012

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)

                                 Senate

  No meetings/hearings scheduled.

                                 House

  No hearings are scheduled.
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

and Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Dennis Calvert, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of BioLargo, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 18, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dennis Calvert     
|                   |  |     |  | Dennis Calvert         
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020222EN.01001501.xml

| 6.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de A Coruña — Spain) — Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña SA v Ayuntamiento de A Coruña

(Case C-45/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Public passenger transport services by rail and by road - Article 8 - Transitional arrangements - Article 8(3) - Expiry of public service contracts - Calculation of the maximum contractual term set at 30 years - Determination of the date from which the maximum term of 30 years starts to run)

(2020/C 222/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de A Coruña

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña SA

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de A Coruña

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 must be interpreted as meaning that the maximum term of 30 years, laid down in that provision for the contracts referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) of that regulation, runs from the date of entry into force of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.

---
Exhibit 21 - Subsidiaries

     The following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Gehl Company (with location
of incorporation):

     o    Compact Equipment Attachments, Inc.
          (Wisconsin), trade styles:  CEA and CE Attachments

     o    Gehl GmbH (Germany)

     o    Gehl International, Inc.
          (Barbados)

     o    Gehl Power Products, Inc.
          (South Dakota)

     o    Hedlund Martin, Inc.
          (Pennsylvania)

     o    Mustang Manufacturing Company, Inc.
          (Minnesota), trade style:  Mustang
# C_2021263EN.01000302.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by E

(Case C-480/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Income tax - Income from capital - Income distributed by a resident undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) constituted in accordance with contract law - Income distributed by a UCITS established in another Member State and constituted in accordance with statute - Difference in treatment - Article 65 TFEU - Objectively comparable situations)

(2021/C 263/04)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

E

joined party: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63 and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a tax practice of a Member State according to which, for the purpose of the taxation of income of a natural person residing in that Member State, the income received from an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) constituted in accordance with statute and established in another Member State cannot be equated with income received from UCITS established in the first Member State on the ground that the latter do not have the same legal form.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.

---
# C_2018399EN.01001801.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte (Italy) lodged on 28 June 2018 — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Gruppo Torinese Trasporti Gtt SpA

(Case C-425/18)

(2018/C 399/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS)

Defendant: Gruppo Torinese Trasporti Gtt SpA

Question referred

Do Articles 53(3) and 54(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC, (1) in conjunction with Article 45(2)(d) of Directive 2004/18/EC, (2) preclude a provision such as Article 38(1)(f) of Legislative Decree No 163/2006 of the Italian Republic, as interpreted by national case-law, which excludes from the scope of ‘grave professional misconduct’ on the part of an economic operator conduct consisting in infringement of the competition rules, which has been established and penalised by the national competition authority by decision upheld by the courts, thereby precluding a priori the contracting authorities from assessing such infringements independently for the purposes of determining whether such an economic operator is to be excluded from a tender procedure for the award of a public contract, as a possible but not a mandatory outcome?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).

---
EXHIBIT 32
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Dennis P. Calvert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.
 
 Dated: November 15, 2010



By:

/s/ DENNIS P. CALVERTDennis P. CalvertPresident and Chief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  I, Charles K. Dargan II, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.
 
 Dated: November 15, 2010



By:

/s/ CHARLES K. DARGAN IICharles K. Dargan IIChief Financial Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019004EN.01003701.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/37

---

Action brought on 29 October 2018 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopiderm)

(Case T-644/18)

(2019/C 4/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Faes Farma, SA (Lamiaco-Leioa, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Application for registration No 15 069 438

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2018 in Case R 1305/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the opposition and reject the contested application; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the opposition and reject the contested application;

| — | order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2020433EN.01006801.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/68

---

Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — DEI v Commission

(Case T-694/18) (1)

(2020/C 433/85)

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.

---