alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State, ex rel. Hough et al., *v.*Municipal Court of Cleveland et al.

(No. 31729

Decided March 22, 1950.)

*289
      *Messrs. Woodle & WacMel,*for relators.

*Mr. Lee G. Rowley,*director of law, and *Mr. Robert J. Selzer,*for respondents.

By the Court.

From the facts alleged in the pleadings it is apparent that the instant proceeding is an attempt to convert a proceeding in prohibition into a second proceeding on appeal. A writ of prohibition not being available as a substitute for an appeal (32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 586, Section 24, citing, *inter alia, State, ex rel. Burtzlaff,*v. *Vickery et al., Judges,*121 Ohio St., 49, 166 N. E., 894, and *State, ex rel. Brickell,*v. *Roach, Recr.,*122 Ohio St., 117, 170 N. E., 866), it follows that the motion for judgment on the pleadings in the present case should *290be, and is, sustained and a writ of prohibition is denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard C. Love, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and criminal trespass in the second degree. He was charged with the unlawful entry of two apartments and the theft of a pad of checks from one of the apartments. The tenant of one apartment testified about the presence of a man in his apartment, and the building manager testified that, when she located and approached defendant in a hallway within the building, defendant raised his arms and said that he had not done anything. Subsequently, a pad of blank checks owned by the tenant was found in a cushion of the chair in the office reception room where defendant had been sitting. The manager’s assistant testified that only defendant had been sitting in the chair that morning. That proof was sufficient to corroborate defendant’s confession that he entered both apartments and took the pad of checks, and was legally sufficient to support the convictions *(see,*CPL 60.50; *People v Anderson,*157 AD2d 732; *People v Hayes,*131 AD2d 508; *People v Danzy,*104 AD2d 949). Further, our review of the record reveals that the jury verdict was not contrary to the weight of evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

*1045There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting rebuttal testimony *(see, People v Harris,*57 NY2d 335, 345, *cert denied*460 US 1047; *People v Brown,*126 AD2d 657, *lv denied*70 NY2d 703). The remaining issues raised by defendant were not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8213A, as

modified, shall remain in effect.

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8213A

Modification No.3

)

)

)

)

)

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission ofFuture

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8213A and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby

replaced with May I, 2010.

2. Any references to October 1st with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (VERCS) and/or allowances

for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Middletown Power

LLC ('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and

Order No. 8213A and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further

modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

The State of Connecticut and

Middletown Power LLC

In the matter of

( Printed on Recycled Polper)

79 Elm Street· Hartford, CT 06106-5127

http://www.CLgov/dep

All Equal Opportullity Employer
, .. . .' ,.

Middletown Power LLC 2 Trading Agreement and Order No. 8213A

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Middletown Power LLC

Signature: f' D&> R...4;M

Name: \)"",:J 1. 'b-si4w~s

Date: "1- II" - oS

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

Gari).os()

Director

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

04- .2..~- .:Lc-c'l

Date
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4881-000]


Fulcrum, LLC; Notice of Authorization for Continued Project 
Operation

    The license for the Barber Dam Project No. 4881 was issued for a 
period ending November 30, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 4881 is issued to 
Fulcrum, LLC for a period effective December 1, 2023, through November 
30, 2024, or until the issuance of a new license for the project or 
other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of 
a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before 
November 30, 2024, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Fulcrum, LLC is authorized to continue operation of 
the Barber Dam Project under the terms and conditions of the prior 
license until the issuance of a subsequent license for the project or 
other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first.

    Dated: December 13, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27879 Filed 12-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EX-23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8’s of ECO2 Plastics, Inc. (formerly known as ITEC Environmental Group, Inc.) previously filed on September 28, 2007 (SEC File # 333-146394), January 23, 2008 (SEC File # 333-148821) and March 31, 2008 (SEC File # 333-150002) of our report dated
March 26, 2008 on the financial statements of ECO2 Plastics, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.











SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.


Boca Raton, Florida


August 18, 2009
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 4

- 1137

_____________________________ K.W., Mother of A.G., A Minor Child
, Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Timothy Register , Judge

.

September 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs. , 843 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 2003) (approving procedure that includes dismissal when, after counsel withdraws, the appellant fails to timely file his or her own brief in support of appeal of termination of parental rights)

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

K.W.
, pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph , A ppellate Counsel
, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee
, for Appellee ; Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals
, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee.
# C_2019399EN.01004801.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Azarov v Council

(Case T-286/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

(2019/C 399/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mykola Yanovych Azarov (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: A. Egger and G. Lansky, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Bauerschmidt and P. Mahni, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 48), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 5), in so far as the applicant’s name was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
# C_2019423EN.01007301.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/73

---

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — YP v Commission

(Case T-563/18) (1)

(2019/C 423/87)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10483

Conference Calendar

 

LEROY WAFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILL LONG; DALLAS COUNTY,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-621-T

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leroy Wafer, Texas prisoner # 289279, appeals the dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. He has filed a

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. 

The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. 

No initial partial filing fee is required. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(4). Wafer shall make monthly payments of twenty

percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Wafer 
No. 96-10483

- 2 -

is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the

clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account

exceeds $10 until the filing fee of $105 is paid. See id.

Wafer argues that the district court erred in dismissing his

§ 1983 action pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372

(1994). We have reviewed the record and found no error in the

reasoning of the district court. See Wafer v. Long, No. 3:96-CV621-T (N.D. Tex. March 29, 1996). Wafer’s appeal is without

arguable merit and, thus, frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Wafer is

cautioned that any future frivolous appeals filed by him or on

his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Wafer is

cautioned further to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. 

IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
19135

#### State v. Faatea

Affirmed
# C_2019305EN.01005002.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aldi v EUIPO — Crone (CRONE)

(Case T-385/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CRONE - Earlier EU figurative marks crane and earlier word mark CRANE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 305/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and M. Minkner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Crawcour and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Christoph Michael Crone (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: M. van Maele and H.-Y. Cho, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2018 (Case R 1100/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Aldi and Mr Crone.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---
# C_2020399EN.01002001.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation

(Case C-526/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Food safety - Novel foods and novel food ingredients - Regulation (EC) No 258/97 - Article 1(2)(e) - Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ - Placing on the market - Whole insects intended for human consumption)

(2020/C 399/27)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Entoma SAS

Defendants: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that foods consisting of whole animals intended to be consumed as such, including whole insects, do not fall within the scope of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Future ADRD Prevention with Intensive Treatment of Hypertension.                    

*Date:*                         February 2, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rajasri Roy, Ph.D., M.P.H, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue,  Bethesda, MD 20892,  (301) 496-9666,                         *rajasri.roy@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 7, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-27264 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
21833

#### State v. Crisolo

Affirmed
# C_2021471EN.01003701.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — TUIfly v Commission

(Case T-447/18) (1)

(State aid - Agreements concluded by Kärntner Flughafen Betriebsgesellschaft with airlines Hapag Lloyd Express and TUIfly - Airport services - Marketing services - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Private investor test - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right of access to the file - Right to be heard)

(2021/C 471/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: TUIfly GmbH (Langenhagen, Germany) (represented by: L. Giesberts and M. Gayger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, A. Bouchagiar and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2018/628 of 11 November 2016 on State aid SA.24221(2011/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by Austria for the Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport (OJ 2018 L 107, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders TUIfly GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders TUIfly GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---