alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael P. WILLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel A. BRAXTON, Warden; Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 05-6560.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.

Decided Oct. 6, 2005.

Michael P. Wills, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Wills seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will *420not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wills has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0169

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

ISAIAH JAMES PEHRINGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 30, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2024

08/26/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0169
#### Kepo’o v. Kane; Dela Cruz v. Department of Hawaiian Home Lands ex rel. Kane; Tanimoto v. Department of Hawaiian Home Lands ex rel. Kane

23702

02/16/2005

Denied

106 Hawai'i 270, 103 P.3d 939
EXHIBIT 31.2




Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


and Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




I, Charles K. Dargan II, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BioLargo, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: May 17, 2010
By:
/s/ CHARLES K. DARGAN IICharles K. Dargan IIChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PW PREFERRED
YIELD FUND II LP
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,949,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,071,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      35,945,433
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,056,632<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,340,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          928,958
<BONDS>                                             90
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,411,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,340,389
<SALES>                                      3,678,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,629,552<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,950,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                420,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            420,761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   420,761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.75<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F2>INCLUDES NET LOSSES ON DISPOSITIONS OF EQUIPMENT
<F1>PER CLASS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS OUTSTANDING
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Maritime Sustainment Technology and Innovation 
Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 6, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Maritime Sustainment and 
Technology Innovation Consortium (``MSTIC'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Anderson Contract 
Engineering, Inc., Melbourne, FL; Bath Iron Works Corp., Bath, ME; 
Bosch Rexroth Corp., Bethlehem, PA; C3I, Exeter, NH; Core4ce LLC, 
Reston, VA; Delta Group Electronics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Divergent 
Technologies, Inc., Torrance, CA; JR3 Consulting LLC, Huntsville, AL; 
KAIROS, Inc., California, MD; KCG Engineering Group, Inc., Virginia 
Beach, VA; MacTaggart Scott USA LLC, Virginia Beach, VA; Martinez and 
Turek, Inc., Rialto, CA; National Instruments Corp., Austin, TX; Nikira 
Labs, Inc., Mountain View, CA; Optowares, Inc., Woburn, MA; P&J 
Robinson Corp., Boerne, TX; Real Time Innovations, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; 
RSL Fiber Systems LLC, East Hartford, CT; Sciaky, Inc., Chicago, IL; 
Snowflake, Inc., Bozeman, MT; Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc., 
Alexandria, VA; and TMGcore, Inc., Plano, TX have been added as parties 
to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MSTIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 21, 2020, MSTIC filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
November 19, 2020 (85 FR 73750).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 7, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2023(88 FR 66060).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27601 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### Ingledue v. Dyer

17289

5/27/97

Dismissed

85 Hawai'i 84, 937 P.2d 925
<PAGE>

                                   CORE, INC.
                             18881 VON KARMAN AVENUE
                                   SUITE 1750
                            IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92612
                            TELEPHONE: (949) 442-2100


                                           February __, 2001

William E. Nixon
22 Anacapri
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677

         Re:      Extension of Mutually-Agreed Severance Date

Dear Bill:

         This is to confirm our agreement that we have mutually-agreed that the
"Severance Date" (as defined in the January 18, 2001 letter agreement between
you and CORE, INC.) will be changed from March 1, 2001 to April 1, 2001.

         Please sign this letter agreement in the space provided below to
evidence your acceptance and agreement with the foregoing.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        CORE, INC.


                                        By: /s/ George C. Carpenter IV
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            George C. Carpenter IV
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Accepted and agreed to.


/s/ William E. Nixon
-----------------------------------
William E. Nixon
(http:/ /www.horrycounty.org/Home.aspx) 

Airports JTEM 8c. 

The Department of Airports is commi~ted to serving the public by effectively and efficiently utilizing the talents of 

its staff and other resources to plan, develop and safely operate the County Airport System to enhance and support 

air commerce and economic development in Horry County and our region. 

Functions 

The Department of Airports is an agency of Horry County and receives its funding for operations and maintenance of County airports through user 

fees and charges on aeronautical activities at the airport. No County general fund taxes are used to support the airports. Partial funding for most 

major capital improvements is obtained through the Federal Aviation Administration and from South Carolina Division of Aeronautics. The 

Department is the largest airport system in the state, with four airports located throughout the County. 

Our Airports 

• Myrtle Beach International Airport MYR 

Visit Website (http://www.flymyrtlebeach.com)- The Myrtle Beach International Airport is a full-service facility that serves as the gateway to the 

Grand Strand. We are committed to providing a clean, safe and passenger-friendly facility that is capable of meeting current travel needs while 

aggressively planning for the future aviation requirements of visitors to the Myrtle Beach area. 
. The Myrtle Beach International Airport is owned by Harry County and operated by the Department ot Airports. Myrtle Beach International 

Airport is under the day-to-day management and direction of the Director of Airports who reports directly to the Harry County Administrator. 

Below is a list of key airport personnel. 

• Director of Airports - Pat Apone, A.A. E. 

• Assistant Director of Airports - Kirk W. Lovell 

• Assistant Director of Airports - Scott Van Moppes, A.A. E. 

• Assistant Director of Airports- Jason Terreri lAP, A.A.E., ACE 

• Myrtle Beach Aviation 

Visit Website (http://www.myrtlebeachaviation.com) - The general aviation fixed based operator located at the Myrtle Beach International 

Airport can be reached at 843-477-1860. 

• Conway-Horry County Airport HVW 

Located on Hwy 378, five miles west of the County seat of Conway, this airport serves general aviation aircraft with parking, refueling, and 

maintenance. You man contact the Harry County Airport at (843) 397-9111. 

• Grand Strand Airport eRE 

Located in the City of North Myrtle Beach between Highway 17 Business and the Intracoastal Waterway, this airport serves private and corporate 

aircraft with parking and refueling. The fixed base operator, North Myrtle Beach Aviation, located at this airport can be reached at: 843-272-

5337, 800-433-8918, or NMBA@horrycounty.org (mailto:NMBA@horrycounty.org). 

• Loris-Twin Cities Airport 

Located on Hwy 701, two miles northeast of Loris, is an unattended, public use airport. 

Airport Director 

Pat Apone 

Contact 

Phone: (843) 448-1580 

Fax: (843) 626-9096 

Mailing Address 

1100 Jetport Road 

A 
Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 

Physical Address 

1100 Jetport Road 

Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 

Office Hours 

8:00AM - 5:00 PM 

Monday through Friday
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, John R. McKernan, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Education Management Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 9, 2005
# C_2021079EN.01001401.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP) v LN

(Case C-655/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2 - Article 9 - Concepts of ‘economic activity’ and ‘taxable person’ - Transactions which seek to obtain income from goods on a continuing basis - Acquisition by a creditor of immovable property in the context of an enforcement procedure carried out for the purpose of the recovery of loans secured by mortgage guarantees and the sale of those buildings - Simple exercise of right of ownership by its holder)

(2021/C 79/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP)

Defendant: LN

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(a) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a transaction by which a person acquires immovable property in the context of an enforcement procedure undertaken for the purpose of recovery of a loan which had previously been granted and, consequently, sells that property does not constitute, in itself, an economic activity, where that transaction falls within the scope of a simple exercise of the right of ownership and of the sound management of private assets, such that that person cannot, in the context of that transaction, be considered a taxable person.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.

---
# TITLE I

THE STATE AND ITS GOVERNMENT

CHAPTER 21-0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Section 21-0:11 21-0:11 Air Resources Council . - 1 . There is hereby established an air resources council which shall be composed of 11 members, including one representing the steampower generating industry; one representing the oil industry; one representing the natural gas industry; one representing the manufacturing component of industry; one representing the field of municipal government ; and 6 members appointed at large who shall represent the public interest, one of whom

shall be a licensed practicing physician or other health care professional possessing expertise in the field of public health and the health-related impacts of air pollution, one of whom shall represent the field of recreation, and at least one of whom shall represent environmental interests. The council members who shall represent the public interest may not derive any significant portion oftheir income frompersons subject to permits or enforcement orders, and may not serve as attorney for, act as consultant for, serve as officer or director of, or hold any other official or contractual relationship with any person subject to permits or enforcement orders . All potential conflicts of interest shall be adequately disclosed. The members shall be residents of the state and shall be appointed by the governor with the consent of the executive council . Each member shall serve for a termof 4 years. 

### Source. 1986, 202:1 . 1994, 412:10 . 1995, 226:12, eff. Aug. 13, 1995; 262:1, eff. Aug. 18, 1995. 2006, 62:1, ef£ June 23, 2006 . 2010, 354

:6, eff. Sept . 18, 2010

.