alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ Marty E. Adams                                            
|Marty E. Adams Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                              
|February 23, 2007                                             

The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Assessment of the TULOAK BUILDING CORPORATION, a Corporation, for the Taxable Year 1953.

No. 37422.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Oct. 8, 1957.

*598J. Howard Edmondson, County Atty.,. Tulsa County, Donald D. Cameron, Chief Civil Asst., Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

J. C. Pinkerton, Tulsa, for defendant’ iu-error.

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Tulsa County Assessor from a judgment of the District Court of Tulsa County, fixing the valuation, for ad valorem tax purposes for the years 1953 and 1954, of a certain building in the City of Tulsa, known as the Haver Building which was owned and operated by the Tuloak Corporation. The protest and subsequent proceedings as to assessment for each of said years constituted a-separate matter on appeal but both of them, were consolidated in the District Court over objection of the assessor. The parties-will be referred to as “assessor” and “protestant.”

The value placed upon the lot upon which-the building stood was fixed for taxation! at $120,000 for each of said years and no question was raised with regard to it. This litigation is concerned with the assessed valuation of the building which was fixed by the assessor at $61,740 for each of said' years. The judgment of the trial court,, from which this appeal was taken, fixed, said value at $37,800.

Except for minor differences in, the evidence, this case is identical as to. issues and questions of law to cause numbered 37,417 styled Appeal of National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa, Okl., 316 P.2cP 175. Our opinion in that case, promulgated on the 17th day of September, 1957, is dis-positive of the instant case. Therefore said opinion and syllabus therein is approved and adopted as the syllabus and opinion herein, and the judgment of the-District Court is affirmed.

*599CORN, V. C. J., and HALLEY, WILLIAMS, JACKSON and CARLILE, jj., concur.

WELCH, C. J., and JOHNSON and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur by reason of stare decisis.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 98 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial Services 

in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2015 

Mr. HENSARLING submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Financial Services in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Financial 

4 Services (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $15,190,467.00 for the One Hun9 dred Fourteenth Congress. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 98 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,583,426.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2015, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2016; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,607,041.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2016, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2017. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 59

  Recognizing the National Construction Equipment Museum established, 
   operated and maintained by the Historical Construction Equipment 
      Association located in Bowling Green, Ohio, as the National 
                     Construction Equipment Museum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2015

Mr. Latta submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the National Construction Equipment Museum established, 
   operated and maintained by the Historical Construction Equipment 
      Association located in Bowling Green, Ohio, as the National 
                     Construction Equipment Museum.

Whereas the Historical Construction Equipment Association, located in Bowling 
        Green, Ohio, was incorporated in 1987 and organized as a not-for-profit 
        organization in the State of Ohio and is recognized as a 501(c)(3) 
        charitable educational organization by the Internal Revenue Service;
Whereas the Historical Construction Equipment Association is recognized as an 
        official archive of the national construction equipment industry;
Whereas the Historical Construction Equipment Association is devoted to 
        preserving for public education the history of all types of 
        construction, surface mining, and dredging equipment and established the 
        National Construction Equipment Museum in furtherance of this purpose;
Whereas the National Construction Equipment Museum has an extensive collection 
        of restored, historically significant equipment in operating condition 
        for public tours and demonstrations;
Whereas the National Construction Equipment Museum seeks to educate a diverse 
        audience through exceptional exhibits that document the importance of 
        this equipment and these industries in building the Nation's 
        infrastructure while also raising job and career awareness in these 
        fields; and
Whereas the National Construction Equipment Museum is a destination attraction, 
        located in northwest Ohio, an area which has a long history of equipment 
        manufacturing, and is the only public museum of its kind in the Nation: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the National 
Construction Equipment Museum established, operated and maintained by 
the Historical Construction Equipment Association located in Bowling 
Green, Ohio, as the National Construction Equipment Museum.
                                 <all>
```
A L AN M
. A RAKAWA MA Y OR 2 0 0 South High Stree t W ailuku , Hawai'

j 9 6 7 93-2155 T elep ho n e (8 0 8) 270 -785 5 F ax (808) 270

- 7870 e - rn ai l : mayor s.o ftic e @ mauicounty.gov 

### OFFI C E OF TH E M A YOR

, Ke ' ena 0 K a M e ia COUN TY OF MA U l

- Kalana 0 M aui March 10 , 2014 M r . Kevin Schlemmer Director, E s sential Air Service U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue , SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr
. Schlemmer:

RE: Le tter of Support for Mokulele Airl i nes ' Kalaupapa EAS Proposal I am writing in support of Mokule l e Flight Services , Inc. (Mokulele Airlines) wi th regard to the company ' s application to provide essential air service to Kalaupapa on th e island ofMoloka ' i. While Kalaupapa technically comprises Kalawao County within the State ofHawai'i, the island of Molokai is one of the four main i slands that comprise Maui Coun ty . My o f fice has received c alls from a number ofMol o ka ' i residents who v o i ced their concerns that flig hts in and out of Molokai have been suspended due to Islan d A ir refocusing flights to and from Lanai. To meet the g rowing needs of the i s l and of Moloka ' i , Mo kulele has already responded by expandi ng flight serv ice t o Molo k a 'i, which is helping the community regain some of their travel options
. It is my belief that Mokulele is the ideal carrier to provide esse n tial service t o Kalaupapa , as the company is known to o f fer competitively-priced f l ig hts and passengeroriented schedules that other airlines often do not . Additionally , as a governmen t employee and frequent traveler myself, I can pers o nally attest to the fri endly and effic i ent staff
. Mokulele Airl ines h as upgr a ded its fleet with nine n ew 9

- passenger Cessna Caravan aircraft
. To further demonstrate their commitment to safety, each fl i ght is operated w i th two pilots , although n ot an FAA requ i rement . For the reasons stated abo v e, I humbly ask that the essential air serv i ce route t o Kalaupapa be awarded t o Mokulele Flight Services , Inc
. Thank you for your c onsideration in th i s matter . Respectf u l ly ,
ALAN M
. ARAKAWA Mayor, County of Mau i
CHAPTER 3 

Issue Category: When Does This Action 

Take Effect?

Pages 3-433 – 3-435

Response to Public Comments

Water Quality Standard Regulatory Revisions

August, 2015

40 CFR Part 131

Docket #: EPA-HQ-OQ-2010-0606

This document is part of a larger document.
Chapter 3 – Response Essays 11.a – Effect – Gen Supp 

Essay 11.a – When Does This Action Take Effect: General Support

No comments are assigned to this issue category, and thus no response is necessary.

3-433
Chapter 3 – Response Essays 11.b – Effect – Gen Opp 

Essay 11.b – When Does This Action Take Effect: General Opposition

No comments are assigned to this issue category, and thus no response is necessary.

3-434
Chapter 3 – Response Essays 11.c – Effect – Other Options 

Essay 11.c – When Does This Action Take Effect: Other Options EPA 

Should Consider

No comments are assigned to this issue category, and thus no response is necessary.

3-435
1

NO. _______________________

JESUS EFRAIN ABREGO, § IN THE TEXAS 

Petitioner §

§

VS. § COURT OF 

§

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

Appellee § CRIMINAL APPEALS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes now Jesus Efrain Abrego, Petitioner, and files this motion for an extension of one

(1) day to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. In Support thereof, Petitioner would show 

as follows:

Petitioner was conviction was affirmed by the Seventh Court of Appeals on March 13, 

2015. The deadline for filing Petitioner’s Petition for Discretionary Review was April 13, 2015. 

This is Petitioner’s first request for an extension of time.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, counsel is requesting a one (1) day 

extension, until April 14, 2015, to adequately discharge his duty to his client. 
2

Respectfully submitted,

Stickels & Associates, P.C.

John W. Stickels

P. O. Box 121431

Arlington, Texas 76012

Phone: (817) 479 - 9282

Fax: (817) 622 - 8071

BY: /S/ John W. Stickels

John W. Stickels

State Bar No. 19225300

Attorney for Jesus Efrain Abrego

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 14

th day of April, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above 

and foregoing Motion has been delivered to the office of the Tarrant County Criminal District 

Attorney, 401 West Belknap, Fort Worth, Texas 76196.

/S/ John W. Stickels

John W. Stickels

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that on the 14

th day of April, 2015, a conference was held between my 

office and a representative for the Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office, and she stated that 

she is not opposed to the granting of Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time.

/S/ John W. Stickels

John W. Stickels
#### Carl James ALLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-74-280.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 15, 1974.

Shirley & Stephenson, Watonga, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Michael Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Kernan, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

The appellant, Carl James Allen, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in Case No. CRF-73^12 of the District Court, Blaine County, of the offense of Operating a Motor Vehicle Upon a Public Highway While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, Second and Subsequent Offense. He was sentenced to serve a term of three (3) years in the State penitentiary in accordance with the verdict of the jury. A timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

In light of the issue here presented, it is unnecessary to summarize the evidence adduced at defendant’s trial.

The defendant brings four assignments of error. Three of them do not merit discussion. The fourth necessitates the reversal of this case. In that assignment of error the defendant asserts that the State introduced evidence in its case in chief that, *1387following his arrest, he refused to take a blood or breathalyzer test.

The introduction of such evidence, when objection is timely made and the question preserved for review on appeal, constitutes reversible error. In Jackson v. State, Okl. Cr., 397 P.2d 920 (1955), we stated in the third paragraph of the syllabus:

> “Permitting evidence in chief, over objection of the defendant of his refusal to take ‘Sobriety Test’ is prejudicial error and is reversible upon review

> 

See also, Sloan v. State, Okl.Cr., 503 P.2d 580 (1972); Engler v. State, Okl.Cr., 316 P.2d 625 (1957).

The judgment and sentence appealed from is accordingly reversed and remanded.

BLISS, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
Tasks of Accredited Veterinarians Cited in 9 CFR 161.1(g)

(g) Tasks that applicants for accredited status must be able to perform. Applicants for

accredited status must be able to:

(1) Category I .  

(i) Perform physical examination of individual Category I animals to determine

whether they are free from any clinical signs suggestive of communicable disease.

(ii) Recognize the common breeds of Category I animals and accurately record breed

information on official documents.

(iii) Apply common animal identification for Category I animals.

(iv) Properly complete certificates for domestic and international movement of Category I

animals.

(v) Perform necropsies on Category I animals.

(vi) Recognize and report clinical signs and lesions of exotic animal diseases that occur in

Category I animals.

(vii) Vaccinate Category I animals and accurately complete the vaccination certificates.

(viii) Properly collect and ship specimen samples to the appropriate laboratory for testing with

complete and accurate paperwork.

(ix) Develop appropriate biosecurity protocols, as well as cleaning and disinfection protocols, to

control communicable disease spread in Category I animals.

(2) Category II .  

(i) Perform physical examination of individual animals and visually inspect

herds or flocks to determine whether the animals are free from any clinical signs suggestive of

communicable disease.

(ii) Recognize the common breeds of Category I and Category II animals, including the types of

poultry as defined by the National Poultry Improvement Plan in subchapter G of this chapter

and the common breeds of livestock, and be able to accurately record breed information on

official documents.

(iii) Recognize all USDA animal identification systems.

(iv) Estimate the age of livestock using a dental formula.

(v) Apply USDA‐recognized identification (e.g., eartag, microchip, tattoo) for the USDA animal

identification system.

(vi) Certify the health status of an avian flock regarding diseases of domestic or international

regulatory concern, and evaluate records pertaining to poultry flock testing and participation in

Federal and State poultry health programs and classifications.

(vii) Properly complete certificates for domestic and international movement of animals.

(viii) Apply and remove official seals.

(ix) Perform necropsies on animals.

(x) Recognize and report clinical signs and lesions of exotic animal diseases.

(xi) Develop a herd or flock health plan consistent with requirements in subchapters B, C, and D

of this chapter.

(xii) Vaccinate for USDA program diseases and accurately complete the vaccination certificate.
(xiii) Properly collect and ship sample specimens to an appropriate laboratory for testing with

complete and accurate paperwork.

(xiv) Properly perform testing for tuberculosis (e.g., caudal fold test).

(xv) Develop appropriate biosecurity protocols, as well as cleaning and disinfection protocols, to

control communicable disease spread.

(xvi) Explain basic principles for control of diseases for which APHIS or APHIS‐State cooperative

programs presently exist.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1332]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                  _____
                                 

                          HON. GARY C. PETERS

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

  Mr. PETERS. On Monday, July 23, 2012 I unfortunately missed two votes 
due to a delay in my flight to Washington, DC. Had I been present I 
would have opposed both bills.
  H.R. 2362, the Indian Tribal Trade and Investment Demonstration 
Project Act of 2011 benefits one particular country, and is redundant 
to H.R. 205 the HEARTH Act which has passed both the House and Senate 
and is waiting to be signed by the President. S. 2039 would undermine 
an important policy in place to protect federal taxpayer dollars and 
prevent wasteful spending. While I was not able to cast my vote against 
these bills, had I been present I would have voted ``no.'' I was happy 
to see that both were defeated.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2019148EN.01000602.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/6

---

Appeal brought on 13 June 2018 by Mauro Bettani against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 24 April 2018 in Case T-80/18, Bettani v Commission

(Case C-392/18 P)

(2019/C 148/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Mauro Bettani (represented by: Mauro Bettani, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 7 March 2019, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Mr Mauro Bettani to bear his own costs.

---
# C_2020262EN.01000701.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — European External Action Service v Stéphane De Loecker

(Case C-187/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - European External Action Service (EEAS) - Member of the temporary staff - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Action for annulment and damages - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to be heard - Article 266 TFEU - Compliance with the annulling judgment)

(2020/C 262/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Stéphane De Loecker (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul GERVACIO-ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40856.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*79PER CURIAM: *

Raul Gervacio-Angel appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of attempted illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court sentenced him to 46 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

For the first time on appeal, GervacioAngel argues that, under *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this court must vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing because the mandatory guideline regime was in place at the time of his sentencing. An unpreserved challenge to the application of the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines is reviewed for plain error. *United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied*— U.S. -, — S.Ct. -, — L.Ed.2d -, 2005 WL 1811485 (2005).

The district court’s application of the guidelines in their mandatory form constituted error that is “plain” for purposes of satisfying the first two prongs of the plain error analysis. *Id.*Gervacio-Angel also bears the burden of demonstrating “that the sentencing judge — sentencing under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory one — would have reached a significantly different result.” *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied*— U.S. -, — S.Ct. -, — L.Ed.2d -, 2005 WL 816208 (2005). Gervacio-Angel has not made such a showing.

Gervacio-Angel also argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As GervacioAngel concedes, this argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and *Almendarez-Torres*was not overruled by *Apprendi. See United States v. Sarmiento-Funes,*374 F.3d 336, 346 (5th Cir.2004). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under dle limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.