alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021044EN.01000901.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/9

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS)

(Case C-394/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Citizenship of the European Union - Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 3 - Beneficiaries - Incorrect transposition - Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law - Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 44/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR

Defendant: Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles (Brussels Labour Court (French-speaking), Belgium) by decision of 14 May 2019 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
MAGELLAN TECHNOLOGY, INC. FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 159,109
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          478,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                           206,800
<INVENTORY>                                            938,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,542,390
<PP&E>                                               1,126,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                         187,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,076,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                7,005,408
<BONDS>                                                617,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 3,545
<OTHER-SE>                                         (3,549,925)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,076,172
<SALES>                                              2,605,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,605,952
<CGS>                                                  521,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,661,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       358,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     424,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (4,929,408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (4,929,408)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (4,929,408)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5292]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. KING of New York:
       H.R. 6196.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:
       The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, 
     Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for 
     the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; 
     but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform 
     throughout the United States.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentlewoman from North Carolina 
(Ms. Foxx) come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Ms. FOXX led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
18826, 18909

#### United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. Civil Service Com'n, State of Hawaii

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15D-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002, 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of
Williams Controls, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAYDennis E. Bunday Chief Financial
Officer Williams Controls, Inc December 14, 2006

---
22 nd October 2013

Dr David T Danielson

Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

US Department of Energy Mail Station EE

‐ 1

1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

Dear Assistant Secretary Danielson,

Indesit Company International Business S.A. based in Lugano, Ticino 6928 Switzerland

hereby submits this Petition for Waiver and application for Interim Waiver, pursuant to

10 CFR 430.27, for its Ariston branded condenser tumble dryer models TCL 73 X NA

and TCL 73 XS NA.

Indesit Company is a European manufacturer of household appliances including

refrigeration, washing machines, cookers and dishwashers in addition to tumble dryers

. The company head office is in Italy and the tumble dryer manufacturing plant is in the

UK. In addition to tumble dryers Indesit Company also sells, washers, washerdryers,

hobs, ovens and hoods in the USA under the Ariston, Scholtes and Splendide brands.

This petition and application are based on the following major points:

1. Indesit’s petition is for condenser clothes dryer models TCL73XNA and

TCL73XSNA for sale in the USA during the remainder of 2013 and 2014.

2. The test procedures outlined in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix D cannot

be applied to condensing type tumble dryers.

3. Waivers have previously been granted for similar products produced by other

manufacturers including Bosch, Miele and ASKO.

4. The equivalent product on sale in Europe has been tested in accordance the

European energy labelling standard and complies with the European energy

labelling directives.

5. Lack of relief will impose economic hardship on Indesit Company particularly

where Indesit washing machines are sold as a pair with a matching tumble

dryer, which is common practice in the USA.

6. Indesit will notify all clothes dryer manufacturers of domestically marketed

units known to Indesit of this petition and application by letter.

We would be pleased to discuss this request with the DOE and to provide any further

information as required.

Yours sincerely,

Aldo Cariati

Marketing Manager International Business
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonorrblo Bet Ford, Adminl8tr~tor 

hur Llqaor Oontrul Boar6 I 

Au8 tin, Texa8 

Boar 81x-r 

quertlon b8 bQen reoolt 

‘ItI th8 right 6iV8ll t0 8 8UbdiVi81OlI 18 

iPQ1184 the mr by l doptlw prohlbltfon to 

pat l rule in iox- wh8roby th8 aa10 0r Uquor 

8hdl b0 M-58 Ud&ti ifs l TOrY iOOt Or it8 

torrltorf, l tta mm thi8 it r08ulO8 that no 

part or that territory em meke the 8al0 tatrti in sU0h PVtpt, 8inO0 that WOtIad b4 hOOtt- 

-0 =--~=~-I~- I. 10 . . .2eI.,.‘,.. a. 1 m . . . . . . . 1.1. ..I”,*” Y”..” as-m.“.* . . .*. ..,e.“.. ..““AL e” .m A9.l .I... 
Honorable Bert lord, Tage 2 

8iStOllt with the pawor of the larger so to emtabllsh the law throughout its extent. And thin 

la not allowed to affeot the right of an inoluded 

8Ubdivi8iOn to a&opt thr law for iteelf when it 

has been rejeoted by the lnoludlng one.* 

The oourta have repeatedly held that thars cannot 

be a wet preolnot within a dry oounty, thererore, it w0ula 

naturally rollow that there oou1.d not be a wet area within 

a dry preolnot. 30 Seotion ZO, Article 16, or the Stata 

COIi8titUtiOn, Artlole 666-83 Or the Penal Code, and the case8 

or Coker, County Judge v. Kmloik, 87 5. %. (2d) 1076, 

Walling v. King, county Judge, 07 s. IF. (2d) 1074, Aaron v. 

Stat.., eo s. w. 267, and Ex Part0 iaia8, 46 3. w. 1X7. 

In view or the roregola; authorities you are reapaotfully advised that it i8 the opinion Or this Dep&rtmUt 

that the annexed wet territory would take the status of the 

aunexlng dry territory. 

Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your 

inquiry, we remain 

Yours very tiuly 

ATTORNEY GENl?RAL OF -TDAS 

By 

Ardbll William8 

A88i8tant
#### Lebo et al., Appellants, *v.*Reading Transit & Light Company.

Practice, *G. P.*— New *trial*— Discretion *of court*— Appeal.

The appellate court -will not reverse an order of the common pleas granting a new trial where no abuse of discretion appears on the part of the lower court, and that court states that in its judgment “the ends of justice will be best served by submission of this case to a second jury.”

Argued March 4,1919.

Appeal, No. 262, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Berks Co., May T., 1917, No. 89, granting a new trial in case of Franklin E. Lebo, by his next friend and father, William Lebo and Henry Schofer’s Sons, Intervening plaintiffs, v. Reading Transit & Light Company.

Before Brown, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson and Kephart, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a motorman in charge of an electric railway car.

*271At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $8,010.46.

The court granted a new trial.

Enduch, ]¿\ J., filed an opinion which was in part as follows:

There remains defendant’s objection founded upon the size of the verdict. It must be conceded that it is beyond what is usual and beyond what appears needful for the purposes of compensation for the plaintiff’s suffering and pecuniary loss, past, present and future. Á careful examination of the case, however, has led to the conclusion that this objection cannot properly, and therefore ought not to be attempted to, be remedied by the court reducing the verdict. In order to justify that there ought to be an adequate basis in the evidence for it affording a safe measure of reduction: see Stauffer v. Reading, 208 Pa. 436, 437. The evidence here does not furnish that basis and measure for a reduction, and the latter would appear as, and could hardly be other than, an arbitrary act on the part of the court. Moreover, it must not be overlooked that in an action like this a plaintiff on the question of his damages has the constitutional right to have them assessed by a jury: Bradwell v. Pittsburgh Pass. Ry. Co., 139 Pa. 404, subject to the power of the court to set aside the verdict if clearly too great or too small. We are of opinion that in this instance the ends of justice will be best served by the submission of this case to a second jury. Further discussion of it at this time with reference to the quantum of the damages is therefore inadvisable: see McKnight v. Bell, 135 Pa. 358, 373.

The rule for judgment n. o. v. is discharged and the rule for a new trial is made absolute.

Plaintiffs appealed.

*Error assigned*was order granting new trial.

*Robert Grey Bushong,*with him *H. P. Keiser,*for appellant.

*272*G.. H. Buhl,*for appellee.

March 24,1919:

Pbr Curiam,

This appeal is from tbe order of tbe learned court below awarding a new trial. It was awarded because, in tbe judgment of tbe court, tbe ends of justice called for a submission of tbe case to a second jury. We have not been convinced that there was any abuse of discretion in making tbe order; on tbe contrary it was properly exercised, and this appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000856141
<NAME> COOL SPRINGS, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         208,395
<SECURITIES>                                   425,999
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,034,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     736,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,034,394
<SALES>                                     10,883,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,951,452
<CGS>                                        8,085,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,935,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               311,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,639,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,639,779
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,639,779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   220.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   220.45


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred L. Holliger, Chief Executive Officer of Giant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Giant.

                             By: /s/ FRED L. HOLLIGER
                                ------------------------------
                                Name:  Fred L. Holliger
                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 1, 2007
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of ECO2 Plastics,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), Raymond M. Salomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By: /s/ Raymond
M. Salomon


Raymond
M. Salomon


Chief
Financial Officer





April 13,
2009





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ECO2
Plastics, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1342]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 RECOGNIZING NORTHWEST FLORIDA'S JUSTIN GATLIN AS A MEMBER OF THE 2012 
                       UNITED STATES OLYMPIC TEAM

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JEFF MILLER

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, July 26, 2012

  Mr. MILLER of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize 
Northwest Florida's Justin Gatlin as a member of the 2012 United States 
Olympic Team. Every 4 years, our nation joins together to root on the 
athletes that represent us at the Summer Olympic Games and for those of 
us from Northwest Florida, we will be rooting even harder when Justin 
competes in the 100 meter sprint to bring the gold back home.
  From an early age, Justin displayed an incredible God-given talent 
for track and field. He grew up in Pensacola, Florida and ran both 
sprint and hurdles to help lead Woodham High School to a state 
championship, before accepting a scholarship to the University of 
Tennessee. At Tennessee, Justin won six consecutive NCAA titles in two 
years, before turning pro at age 19.
  In 2004, Justin qualified for the Olympic Games in Athens, Greece by 
winning the U.S. Olympic Trials in the 100 meters and finishing runner 
up in the 200 meters. In Athens, Justin became the youngest ever to win 
the gold medal in the 100 meters, while also bringing home a silver 
medal as part of the U.S. 4x100 meter relay team, and a bronze medal in 
the 200 meters. He followed up his successful Olympic performance a 
year later by becoming the first American sprinter to win both the 100 
and 200 meter races at the national championships since Kirk Baptiste 
in 1985. That same year he became only the second sprinter in history 
to win gold medals in the World Championships in the 100 and 200 
meters, and his victory in the 100 meters by .17 seconds was the 
largest winning margin in World Championship history.
  After four years away from the track, Justin returned in 2010 to seek 
another gold medal. He won his first event in 2010 and finished runner 
up in the 2011 USA Track and Field Championships. In 2012, Justin has 
already had a successful season, winning the U.S. Olympic Trials in the 
100 meters in a personal best 9.80 seconds, proving that he is ready to 
help the U.S. team go for gold in London this summer. Justin's victory 
in the Olympic Trials, 8 years after his first Olympic triumph, is an 
example of the success that can be achieved by working hard even after 
you reach the pinnacle of your career.
  Mr. Speaker, I am privileged to rise on behalf of Florida's First 
Congressional District to recognize Northwest Florida's own Justin 
Gatlin and wish him the best as he represents our country and competes 
for another Olympic gold medal.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4248 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4248

    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain 
  disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2017

 Mr. Huizenga introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certain 
  disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CONFLICT MINERAL REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (p) of section 13 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 1502; and
            (2) in the table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act, 
        by striking the item relating to section 1502.
                                 <all>
```