alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 9 -00 136 -CV G e or ge G e offr e y P ot ts , A ppe lla nt

v. Gr eystone Off

ice, LP , Appellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1- CV-08 -00 6124 , HO NORAB LE J. DAVID P HI LLIP S , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Geor g e Ge offr ey

Potts has filed a

Motion to Dismiss Appeal and ha s cer tified that the motion is unopposed. We gr ant the motion and dismiss this appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: May

29, 2009
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick J. Conroy, offered the following 
prayer:
  Dear God, we give You thanks for giving us another day.
  As the Members of this people's House return, grant them the 
generosity to serve You as You deserve; to give of their industry and 
not count the cost; to fight for their convictions and not heed the 
political wounds; to toil and not seek for rest; to labor and not ask 
for reward except for knowing that, in being their best selves, they do 
Your will.
  And, dear God, on this day, we ask Your blessing upon the family of 
Tim Harroun. Grant them peace and consolation as they mourn the loss of 
their mother.
  May all that is done be for Your greater honor and glory.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
18912

#### State v. Gonzales

Affirmed
#### State v. Tasaka

17982

12/14/94

Affirmed
<PAGE>
 
                                                               Exhibit 10(oo)(1)

Exhibit 10(oo)(1)
-----------------

                      Terms of Promotion for Keith Price
                      ----------------------------------

     In light of Mr. Prices' change of status, the Company has agreed that the
term of his employment with the Company will be extended for a period of two
years commencing August 5, 1998, rather than the one-year period stated in Mr.
Price's Employment Agreement.

     In consideration of Mr. Price's agreement to take on the additional
responsibilities of Chief Executive Officer, the Company has agreed, subject to
approval of the Board's Compensation and Human Resources Committee, that the
Company will grant to Mr. Price non-qualified stock options under the Company's
Stock Incentive Plan to purchase an additional 50,000 shares of the Company's
common stock at a purchase price equal to the average of the closing prices of
the Company's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on each of the twenty
days ending on November 3, 1998 ($1.24). The terms of these additional options
will be as follows:

(a)  Option Term.  The options will expire three years from the November 4, 1998
     -----------                                                                
     date of grant.

(b)  Vesting.  Fifty percent of the options will vest on May 4, 1999, and fifty 
     -------                                                                   
     percent will vest on November 4, 1999, provided that Mr. Price continues to
                                            --------                            
     serve as the Company's Chief Executive Officer on such dates.  In addition,
     the options will vest on the date (i) of a change of control reportable by
     the Company on SEC Form 8-K or (ii) the Company closes a sale of all or
     substantially all of its assets.

(c)  Exercise.  Subject to applicable securities laws and regulations, all
     --------                                                             
     vested options are exercisable at any time after they vest and prior to the
     expiration of their exercise.
August 2023

There were 10 surveillance inspections conducted at 10 different sites for a total of 

50 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities. 

The water temperatures continued to increase in response to warmer air 

temperatures. Routine harvest continued. The Category 2 site met the criteria to be 

recategorized as Category 1. All other sites with fish in the water remained Category 

1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

September 2022 74 0 25212

October 2022 66 0 25278

November 2022 55 0 25333

December 2022 69 0 25402

January 2023 100 0 25502

February 2023 74 0 25576

March 2023 35 0 25611

April 2023 59 0 25670

May 2023 60 0 25730

June 2023 55 1 25785

July 2023 60 0 25845

August 2023 50 0 25895
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 873 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 873

 Urging that the policy of the United States should be that Government 
 institutions use security measures known as cryptographic splitting, 
   the strongest available form of data centric security, to secure 
sensitive and personal information for data at rest and data in motion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2016

 Mr. Israel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Urging that the policy of the United States should be that Government 
 institutions use security measures known as cryptographic splitting, 
   the strongest available form of data centric security, to secure 
sensitive and personal information for data at rest and data in motion.

Whereas public and private institutions and the critical infrastructure that are 
        the backbone of our national and economic security are under constant 
        attack;
Whereas sensitive information housed within key institutions is being accessed, 
        stolen, and runs the risk of being manipulated, critical systems are 
        vulnerable, and national security and corporate secrets are at risk;
Whereas information and infrastructure are most vulnerable when held by an 
        institution or when traveling from point to point;
Whereas network centric security is not sufficient to prevent a data breach, 
        exfiltration, or manipulation of information; and
Whereas what is needed in order to properly protect sensitive information is the 
        strongest available form of data centric security: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the policy of the United States should be that 
Government institutions use security measures known as cryptographic 
splitting, the strongest available form of data centric security, to 
secure sensitive and personal information for data at rest and data in 
motion.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive
Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: March 5, 2010
            /s/ TODD E.
      WILLETodd E. WilleChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




---
# C_2022084EN.01000401.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — UBS Real Estate Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH v Agenzia delle Entrate

(Joined Cases C-478/19 and C-479/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Closed-ended mutual investment funds - Open-ended mutual investment funds - Investments in real estate - Mortgage registration tax and land registry fees - Tax advantage granted only to closed-ended real estate investment funds - Difference in treatment - Comparability of situations - Objective criteria of differentiation)

(2022/C 84/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UBS Real Estate Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC (now, after amendment, Article 63 TFEU) must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which restricts the benefit of the reduction in mortgage registration tax and in land registry fees solely to closed-ended real estate funds, to the exclusion of open-ended real estate funds, provided that those two categories of fund are in objectively comparable situations, unless such a difference in treatment is justified by the objective of limiting systemic risks on the real estate market.

---

(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5321]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, offered the following prayer:
  Let us pray.
  O Lord, our God, ever living and ever giving, strengthen us to enter 
into Your purpose and to bring blessings to our world. Kindle such 
flames of sacred love within the hearts of our Senators that they will 
be motivated by their passion to please You. Amid all that is transient 
and temporal, keep them loyal to the transcendent and determined. May 
they test their actions by their conscience and by their wisdom of Your 
word and spirit. Lord, strengthen them in every endeavor, empowering 
them in all that pertains to that righteousness which exalts a nation. 
Bind them together in the oneness of a shared commitment to You.
  We pray in Your sacred Name. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Victoria Z. Carlton, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
8th day of August, 2003.



/s/ Michael Hume
--------------------------------------
Michael Hument
Treasurer, Secretary and Director
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UnifyCorporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Peter J. DiCorti, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: September 9, 2003 | /s/ PETER  J. DICORTI   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     | Peter J. DiCorti        |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained byUnify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.*

 

1

----
# C_2019025EN.01004701.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/47

---

Action brought on 9 November 2018 — Nissin Foods Holdings v EUIPO — The GB Foods (Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES)

(Case T-663/18)

(2019/C 25/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japon) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, G. Messenger, Barrister, K. Gilbert and G. Lodge, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The GB Foods, SA (L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES in colours red, black, grey and white — European Union trade mark No 9 377 904

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2018 in Case R 111/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of Applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40355

FROST NATIONAL BANK OF SAN ANTONIO, as Trustee of the Ruth Chapman Cowles and Andrew G. Cowles CharitableTrust; SHARON J. BELL, as CoTrustee of the Ruth Chapman Cowles and Andrew G. Cowles Memorial Trust; BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Co-Trustee of the Ruth Chapman Cowles and Andrew G. Cowles Memorial Trust; VICTORIA BANK & trust, as Trustee of the Trust of the Benefit of Leta Mae Hight and her Descendants; DOUGLAS BURGESS, as Trustee of the Hight Revocable Trust; MARGARET HIGHT; JOHN O. CHAPMAN, JR., Individually and as Trustee of the John O. Chapman Trust; JANE CHAPMAN OWEN, also known as Nancy Jane Owen, Individually and as Trustee of the Nancy Jane Owen Trust; UNA CHAPMAN COX FOUNDATION; DANNA LEA ORR, as Trustee of the Danna Lea Orr Revocable Trust;
TRINITY UNIVERSITY; PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN’S SERVICES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

ANN EICHELBERGER, Co-Trustee of the Marital Deduction Trust under the Will of H. L. Eichelberger, Deceased; BROADWAY NATIONAL BANK, Co-Trustee of the Marital Deduction Trust under the Will of H. L. Eichelberger, Deceased,

Intervenor PlaintiffsAppellants,

versus

TEXACO INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Intervenor2

Defendant-Appellee,* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

3 TEXACO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, INC., formerly known as Texaco Producing Incorporated,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(95-CV-408)

December 8, 1997

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this oil and gas cas e implicating alleged breaches of

contract by Defendants-Appellees, Texaco, Incorporated and Texaco

Exploration and Production, Inc. as mineral lessees of PlaintiffsAppellants and Intervenor Plain tiffs-Appellants (collectively,

Appellants), the district court granted summary judgment dismissing

all claims on alternative grounds of time bar and discharge in

bankruptcy. Appellants appealed the judgment of the district

court.

We have reviewed the summary judgment record from the district

court, the opinion and judgment of that court , the largely

uncontested facts, and the legal arguments of the parties as set4

forth the appellate briefs and oral arguments of able counsel. As

a result of our review, we are convinced that the district court’s

grant of summary judgment should be affirmed for the reasons given

by that court.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23.1 

August 21, 1998

General Nutrition Companies, Inc. 
300 Sixth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Dear Sirs:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information of
General Nutrition Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the twelve
and twenty-four weeks ended July 18, 1998 and July 19, 1997, as
indicated in our report dated August 3, 1998; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 18, 1998, is incorporated by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 33-58096, 33-68590, 33-93370, 333-00128, and
333-21397 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a
part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
Yours truly,



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
# C_2019065EN.01004101.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/41

---

Action brought on 7 December 2018 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO (BRENT)

(Case T-725/18)

(2019/C 65/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. (Atlanta, Georgia, United States) (represented by: R. Hoy, Solicitor and J. Bowhill, QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BRENT — Application for registration No 16 710 014

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 September 2018 in Case R 624/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements listed below of Gehl Company of our report dated
February 12, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which appears
in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated February 12, 2001 relating to the Financial Statement
Schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

        1.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-38392)

        2.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-02195)

        3.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-04017)

        4.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-36102)

        5.  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-09173)


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 28, 2001
#### Deter, Appellee, *v.*Aurand, Appellant.

(No. 32108

Decided May 10, 1950.)

*Mr. Robert L. Moulton, Mr. J. D. Sears*and *Mr. Robert S. Ricksecker,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Myers & Spurlock*and *Mr. Leon McCarty,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Hart, Zimmerman and Turner, JJ., concur.
#### Robert E. Rice et al., Appellants, v John Rhode et al., Respondents.

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and judgment granted to plaintiffs for relief requested in complaint. Memorandum: The court erred in granting defendants a prescriptive easement over plaintiffs’ property because defendants failed to establish use of the right-of-way for the first three years of the prescriptive period. Evidence that unknown third parties used the right-of-way during that time was insufficient to establish the prescriptive easement *(see, Warwick Materials v J.K. Produce Farms,*111 AD2d 805, 807). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J. — Prescriptive Easement.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.