alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020423EN.01000702.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — E. sp. z o.o. sp. k. v Minister Finansów

(Case C-335/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 90 - Reduction of the VAT taxable amount - Total or partial non-payment of the price - Conditions imposed by national legislation for the exercise of the right to reduction - Condition that the debtor must not be the subject of insolvency or winding-up proceedings - Condition that the creditor and the debtor must be subject to VAT)

(2020/C 423/10)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: E. sp. z o.o. sp. k.

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Operative part of the judgment

Article 90 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which makes the reduction of the taxable amount for the purposes value added tax (VAT) subject to the condition that, on the day of delivery of the goods or provision of the services and on the day preceding that on which the adjusted tax return seeking that reduction is filed, the debtor is registered as a taxable person for the purposes of VAT and is not the subject of insolvency or winding-up proceedings, and that, on the day preceding the date of filing of the adjusted tax return, the creditor is itself still registered as a taxable person for the purposes of VAT.

---

(1)  OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.

---
EXHIBIT  99.3

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PW Preferred Yield Fund
II,  L.P.  (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  I,  Gary  D.  Engle,  President  and Director of AFG Leasing VII
Incorporated,  the  sole  General  Partner  of  Pembroke  Financial  Limited
Partnership,  general  partner  of  the  Partnership,  hereby  certify  that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Partnership.


       By:     Pembroke  Financial  Limited  Partnership
               Managing  General  Partner

       By:     AFG  Leasing  VII  Incorporated

       By:     /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
               Gary  D.  Engle
               President  and  Director  of  AFG  Leasing  VII
               Incorporated,  the  sole  General  Partner  of
               Pembroke  Financial  Limited  Partnership

Date:  August  14,  2002
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5728]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS

 Ms. CANTWELL. Mr. President, today I wish to congratulate 
Northwest Kidney Centers on its 50th Anniversary. Northwest Kidney 
Centers was established as the first out-of-hospital dialysis program 
in the world, opening its doors in Seattle, WA, on January 8, 1962.
  Just 2 years after the development of the Teflon shunt at the 
University of Washington, community leaders in Seattle came together to 
raise money and find a space to establish a center to deliver dialysis 
treatments outside of a hospital, which led to the creation of the 
community-based Northwest Kidney Centers.
  Chronic kidney disease is now an epidemic, affecting one in seven 
American adults. Northwest Kidney Centers is working to reverse this 
trend, focusing on community education and prevention. Each year, 
Northwest Kidney Centers allocates funding toward public health 
education about kidney disease and organ donation, participating in 
outreach events and reaching more than 12,000 people with kidney 
information. It also developed a ``Living Well with CKD'' program which 
offers classes on treatment options and good nutrition. This program 
reaches nearly 1,000 pre-dialysis patients and family members each 
year, at no cost to the participants.
  I take great pride in the fact that Seattle is the birthplace of 
chronic dialysis treatments and that Northwest Kidney Centers continues 
to take the lead on developments in the field. Northwest Kidney Centers 
hosted clinical trials to develop the anti-anemia drug Epogen, and set 
up the Northwest Organ Procurement Agency. In 2008, Northwest Kidney 
Centers spearheaded the creation of the Kidney Research Institute, a 
collaboration with the University of Washington Medical School which 
has become a scientific leader focusing on ways to prevent, detect, 
treat, and eventually cure kidney disease.
  I applaud Northwest Kidney Centers for its contributions to the State 
of Washington and the kidney disease and dialysis field as a whole. As 
the organization celebrates its 50th Anniversary, I extend my 
congratulations to the entire Northwest Kidney Centers community--
patients, physicians, employees, supporters and volunteers--and thank 
them for their dedication and commitment to improving the lives of 
kidney patients in my State.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      321
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   635
<PP&E>                                             209
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              377
<BONDS>                                            277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,224
<SALES>                                          1,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,589
<CGS>                                            1,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     45
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 24
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        24
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        

</TABLE>
SEC Connect





 











Exhibit 10.3







Ninth Amendment



to



Employment Agreement


 


This Ninth Amendment to Employment Agreement
(the “Ninth Amendment”), is being entered into
effective October 20, 2016 by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Mr. S. James
Miller Jr. (the “Executive”).



                    


WHEREAS, the Company
and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
September 27, 2005 and subsequently amended on September 27, 2008,
April 6, 2009, December 10, 2009, March 10, 2011, January 31, 2012,
November 1, 2013, January 9, 2015 and again on December 14, 2015
(as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Executive continues to perform valuable
services for the Company and the Company desires to assure itself
of the continuing services of Executive; and


 


WHEREAS, in consideration of the foregoing and in order
to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide for the
continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of
the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further
consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Employment
Agreement, the parties do hereby agree that the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 



1. 

Section “2. Term
of Agreement” strike the language “continue until December
31, 2016” and replace it with “continue until December
31, 2017”.






 


 



2. 

Except as expressly
amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue and be in
full force in all respects.






 


 


 


 







	
 /s/ Wayne Wetherell
 


	
 /s/ S. James
Miller



	
 ImageWare Systems,
Inc.  


	
 S. James
Miller
# C_2021035EN.01000602.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV

(Case C-59/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction - Article 7, points 1 and 2 - Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict - Action seeking an injunction against commercial practices considered to be contrary to competition law - Allegation of abuse of a dominant position occurring in commercial practices covered by contractual provisions - Online accommodation booking platform booking.com)

(2021/C 35/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Booking.com BV

Operative part of the judgment

Point 2 of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as applying to an action seeking an injunction against certain practices implemented in the context of the contractual relationship between the applicant and the defendant, based on an allegation of abuse of a dominant position by the latter in breach of competition law.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.

---
#### State v. Krugel

22799

01/31/2001

Affirmed
# C_2010346EN.01000801.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Anotato Dikastirio tis Kipriakis Dimokratias (Cyprus)) — Simvoulio Apokhetefseon Lefkosias v Anatheoritiki Arkhi Prosforon

(Case C-570/08) (1)

1

(Public contracts - Directive 89/665/EEC - Article 2(8) - Body responsible for review procedures that is not judicial in character - Annulment of the contracting authority’s decision to accept a tender - Possibility for the contracting authority to appeal against that annulment before a judicial body)

2010/C 346/12

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Anotato Dikastirio tis Kipriakis Dimokratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Simvoulio Apokhetefseon Lefkosias

Applicant:

Defendant: Anatheoritiki Arkhi Prosforon

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Anotato Dikastirio Kiprou (Cyprus) — Interpretation of Article 2(8) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33) — Right of a contracting authority to judicial review of decisions of a responsible body, within the meaning of that provision, which is not judicial in character

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(8) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992, must be interpreted as not requiring the Member States to provide, also for contracting authorities, a right to seek judicial review of the decisions of non-judicial bodies responsible for review procedures concerning the award of public contracts. However, that provision does not prevent the Member States from providing, in their legal systems, such a review procedure in favour of contracting authorities.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86688-86689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 86689]]

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 5, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 29 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-97, CP2024-99.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-27417 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2020240EN.01002001.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Spenner GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-189/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Transitional system of free allocation of allowances - Decision 2011/278/EU - Article 9 - Determining the historical activity level - Significant change in the capacity of an installation that took place before the baseline period - Determining the relevant baseline period)

(2020/C 240/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant on a point of law: Spenner GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 9(9) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to significant capacity extensions of an incumbent installation that took place before the baseline period determined in accordance with Article 9(1) of that decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 9(9) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to significant capacity extensions of an incumbent installation that took place before the baseline period determined in accordance with Article 9(1) of that decision.

| 2. | Article 9(1) of Decision 2011/278 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not require the competent national authority itself to determine the relevant baseline period for the purposes of assessing the historical activity levels of an installation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 9(1) of Decision 2011/278 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not require the competent national authority itself to determine the relevant baseline period for the purposes of assessing the historical activity levels of an installation.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2020

b1215 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2020

161215

ANTHONY M. COURY,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161215

COA: 351548

Oakland CC: 2019

- 172427

- NO

IBRAHIM TAKLA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2020

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,007
<SECURITIES>                                       851
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                       563
<INVENTORY>                                      8,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,857
<PP&E>                                          19,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,601
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,571)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,138
<SALES>                                         66,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,411
<CGS>                                           62,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (571)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Source Imaging Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Source Imaging 
Consortium, Inc. (``Open Source Imaging Consortium'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, China Medical 
University Hospital, Taichung City, TAIWAN, has been added as a party 
to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Open Source Imaging Consortium 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On March 20, 2019, Open Source Imaging Consortium filed its 
original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on April 12, 2019 (84 FR 1497).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 23, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 2023 (88 FR 4211).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27572 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P