alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021297EN.01003001.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Roland v Commission

(Case T-132/18) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty - Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid - Market economy treatment (MET) - Individual treatment (IT) - Desk analysis - Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information - Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties - Legal basis - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Non-retroactivity - Proportionality - Non-discrimination - Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Previous decision-making practice - Competence of national authorities and courts)

(2021/C 297/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Roland SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. De Knop, A. Willems and B. Natens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2232 of 4 December 2017 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by certain exporting producers in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ 2017 L 319, p. 30).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Roland SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Roland SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,992,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,009,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (216,607)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,074,595
<PP&E>                                      16,068,792
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,565,220)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,284,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,276,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       781,614
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,281,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,284,367
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,373,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,440,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,787,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                64,974
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             136,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,693,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (195,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,498,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,498,138)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7945

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MYRNA JOSEPHINE HOLT WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:06-cv-00605; 7:98-00091-sgw)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Myrna Josephine Holt Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Myrna Josephine Holt Wilson seeks to appeal the district

court’s order construing her motion for relief of sentence as a

motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and then

dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized

successive motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order

in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion

solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will

not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and

(2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing.

See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

Finally, in accordance with United States v. Winestock,

340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003), we construe Wilson’s notice of

appeal and informal brief as a motion for authorization under 28

U.S.C. § 2244 (2000), to file a successive habeas corpus motion.

To obtain permission to bring a second or successive § 2255 motion,
- 3 -

a movant must show that her claim: (1) “relies on a new rule of

constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review

by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable” or (2)

relies on newly discovered facts that tend to establish the

movant’s innocence. 28 U.S.C. § 2244. We conclude that Wilson has

not satisfied either standard.

Accordingly, we deny Wilson’s implicit application for

leave to file a successive § 2255 motion, deny a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:             |  |                            
|February 21, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020371EN.01000901.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — ZS v EIB

(Case T-659/18) (1)

(Civil service - Staff of the EIB - Health status - Partial disability - Time management - Unjustified absences - Reduced compensation - Liability)

(2020/C 371/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZS (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, the annulment of the decisions of the ECB of 27 February and 22 December 2017 fixing the compensation payable to the applicant as a result of his disability and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 27 September 2017; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 27 September 2017;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders  ZS (*1) to pay half of his costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders  ZS (*1) to pay half of his costs;

| 4. | Orders the EIB to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs of  ZS (*1). |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the EIB to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs of  ZS (*1).

---

(1)  OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERFUMANIA, INC FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,334,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,066,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 62,974,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,698,694
<PP&E>                                      23,073,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,463,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       84,796,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,514
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,637,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               106,463,618
<SALES>                                     85,353,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            85,353,478
<CGS>                                       50,946,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,241,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,568,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,403,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,403,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,403,006)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.58)



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.38
3/7/05 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment No. 2 is between Zix Corporation, a Texas corporation (Company), and Aventis
Inc. (Aventis), a Pennsylvania corporation, and a member of the Sanofi-Aventis Group and amends
that certain Master Services Agreement (herein so called), dated January 30, 2004, by and between
Aventis and the Company, as amended by the letter agreement dated September 12, 2004. 1.   Aventis and the Company desire to amend the Master Services Agreement by amending and restating
the first paragraph of Section 2.5(c) thereto, so that after amendment and restatement it shall
read as follows: 2.5(c).   Minimum Annual Requirements. Subject to Section 2.5(d) below, during
the Term, Aventis shall, pursuant to agreed IPAs, incur (pursuant to clause (iv) below)
Services during each period indicated below such that total amounts payable to Company
(including all costs and fees whatsoever, whether owed to Company, to a third party
provider or otherwise) for such periods equal at least the dollar amount set forth opposite
such period (collectively, the Minimum Annual Requirements), or if Services are
not so incurred, forfeit any balances of Minimum Annual Requirements in accordance with
clause (i) below; and Company shall use its good faith efforts to ensure that sufficient
services are available and timely provided so that Aventis has the reasonable opportunity
to procure under agreed IPAs, and incur (pursuant to clause (iv) below) charges for, such
minimum amounts of Services: Service Period
    
    Minimum Service ValueFirst 435 days of Term (Year 1)
    
    $1,000,000 (Year 1 Minimum)From the end of Year 1 through end of
the Second 12 months of Term (Year 2)
    
    $1,000,000 (Year 2 Minimum)Third 12 months of Term (Year 3)
    
    $2,000,000 (Year 3 Minimum)
 2.   Except as provided herein, all prior terms of the Master Services Agreement remain in effect and
unchanged. In the case of a conflict between the Master Services Agreement and this Amendment
No. 2, the terms of this Amendment No. 2 shall apply. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of
any term of the Agreement.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment 2, to be effective as of
the date first above written. AVENTIS INC.
    
    ZIX CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Christer Odqvist
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ronald A. WoessnerName:
    
    Christer Odqvist
    
    Name:
    
    Ronald A. WoessnerTitle:
    
    Authorized Signatory
    
    Title:
    
    Sr. Vice President & General Counsel
 By:
    /s/ J. DembiecName:
    Jeffrey DembiecTitle:
    head, Financial Services
# C_2019044EN.01008001.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/80

---

Action brought on 10 December 2018 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Lloyd Shoes (LLOYD)

(Case T-729/18)

(2019/C 44/107)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lloyd Shoes GmbH (Sulingen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark LLOYD — Application for registration No 10 367 721

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2018 in Joined Cases R 2385/2017-1 and R 2431/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, inasmuch as, by dismissing in part the appeal brought by the opponent, it upholds in part the decision of the Opposition Division handed down in the opposition proceedings B 1 959 470, granting EU trade mark No 10 367 721 LLOYD (figurative) for ‘wholesaling and retailing, including via the internet and through teleshopping, in the fields of clothing, footwear, headgear’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, inasmuch as, by dismissing in part the appeal brought by the opponent, it upholds in part the decision of the Opposition Division handed down in the opposition proceedings B 1 959 470, granting EU trade mark No 10 367 721 LLOYD (figurative) for ‘wholesaling and retailing, including via the internet and through teleshopping, in the fields of clothing, footwear, headgear’;

| — | order any party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order any party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 84 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 

in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. LEVIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Ways and Means in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Ways and 

4 Means (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $17,715,290 for the One Hundred 

9 Fourteenth Congress. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 84 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,857,645 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2015, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2016; and 

7 (2) not more than $8,857,645 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2016, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2017. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary   
                              financial information extracted 
                              from the financial statements   
                              for Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.
                              and is qualified in its entirety
                              by reference to such financial  
                              statements                      
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854926
<NAME>                        Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,531,838
<SECURITIES>                                   154,184
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               915,131
<PP&E>                                     142,201,472
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,548,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,339,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       79,548,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,790,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               116,339,040
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,504,955
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,937,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,835,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,197,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,197,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (84.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>