alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          67,800
<SECURITIES>                                    54,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,300
<PP&E>                                         962,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 968,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,900
<BONDS>                                        463,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     402,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   968,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.22
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4280 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4280

  To provide for the sunset of rules one year after the date on which 
              they are finalized, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2017

   Mr. Kelly of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in 
    addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the sunset of rules one year after the date on which 
              they are finalized, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Regulations are Successful 
or Ended Act of 2017'' or the ``ERASE Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. SUNSET FOR RULES.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), any rule (as 
such term is defined in section 551 of title 5, United States Code) 
that is finalized after the date of the enactment of this Act shall 
sunset on the date that is one year after the date on which the rule is 
finalized.
    (b) Congressional Approval.--The sunset under subsection (a) shall 
not apply to a rule described in that subsection if a joint resolution 
is enacted which provides for the continuance of that rule.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4301

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the 

Fernando A. Chavez, also known as * District of Nebraska.

Fernando Alvarez Chavez, also known *

as Fernando Chavez-Alvarez, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: November 7, 2000 

 Filed: November 16, 2000 

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Fernando Chavez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Prior to

sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea, contending that his former attorney--who

was replaced after the plea because his license to practice law had been suspended--

had not adequately communicated with him and had misled him about his case. The
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.

-2-

district court1 denied the motion without a hearing and sentenced Chavez to 87 months

imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Chavez appeals, arguing that the court

should have conducted a hearing and should have allowed him to withdraw his plea.

We find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Bahena, 223 F.3d 797, 807

(8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). At the change-of-plea hearing, Chavez was

assisted by an interpreter and was accurately informed of the prison term he faced;

under oath, Chavez affirmed that he had had sufficient time to speak with his attorney,

that he had told his attorney everything the attorney needed to know about his case, that

he was satisfied with his attorney’s representation, that he understood the charge

against him, that he was pleading guilty freely and voluntarily, and that no one had

promised him a lighter sentence. See id. at 806-07 (under very similar facts, defendant

did not show any fair and just reason for withdrawing plea). Nor did the district court

abuse its discretion by not holding a hearing on the motion. See United States v.

Wojcik, 60 F.3d 431, 433 (8th Cir. 1995) (court need not hold hearing on pleawithdrawal motion if allegations are not grounds for withdrawal even if true).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Videos Archives - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Grant Reporting Overview This video overview gives guidance to grantees on how to navigate ARC’s reporting tools on ARCnet, ARC’s current Grants Management System. Reports are used to communicate project activity, progress, and budgetary needs and spending for ARC funded projects, and are required for grants to remain active, to stay in compliance with federal regulations, and to [&#8230;]The post Grant Reporting Overview appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jacob Brownstein on Behalf of Solomon Chodrow, Relator, against Randolph Grasheim, as Warden of the Bronx House of Detention for Men, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

January 28, 1959.

*Jacob Brownstein*for relator.

*Daniel V. Sullivan, District Attorney,*for defendant.

Francis X. Conlon, J.

On this writ of habeas corpus, the

petitioner has attacked the legality of a conviction of a defendant at the Municipal Term of the City Magistrates ’ Court. After conviction the defendant was remanded for one week for investigation before sentencing. Under section 153 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act, a magistrate sitting as such or as a Court of Special Sessions, may so remand a defendant. However, the attack here is based on the lack of jurisdiction of the Municipal Term to try this matter. Under section 102-c of the New York City Criminal Courts Act, city magistrates have jurisdiction to try and punish a violation of section 225 of the Sanitary Code of the city, which violation is declared to be an offense. Under section 130, Administrative Code violations which are misdemeanors may be tried by a magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions. Under section 141, the Municipal Term has jurisdiction of violations of the Administrative Code which are misdemeanors.

It may be that the conviction is illegal because of the lack of jurisdiction of the Municipal Term to try this matter, but such determination need not be made by this court. In fact, on the papers and arguments submitted, such decision should not be rendered by this court on this proceeding. It should be left for the orderly determination on appeal. However, if the conviction should not be sustained, the defendant would be harmed by the remand. Accordingly, the writ is sustained, the defendant will be released on bail in the amount of $250 for appearance at the *36Municipal Term of the City Magistrates’ Court, Borough of Manhattan, 455 West 151st Street, New York 31, N. Y., on January 30, 1959, at 11:00 a.m., for such further procedings as may be had in that court.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Billy George Kemp

, * From the 106th District

Court of Dawson County,

Trial Court No. 10

- 0 7

- 18413.

No. 11

- 11

- 00292

- CV * October 31, 2013

Sharon Anne Kemp, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C. J., McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the judgment below. Therefore, i n accordance with our opinion, we modify

Section (2) on page ten of the decree to read as follows:

(2) An award and judgment in favor of Petitioner Wife for reimbursement to her separate property estate, against Respondent Husband in the amount of $3,964, bearing interest at the rate of 5% per

annum from and after June 8, 2011, all due and payable on or before August 15, 2011.

We modify the decree to delete Section (3) on page ten in its entirety.

We also modify the decree to delete the words “and prior years” in the first

paragraph under the heading “Federal Income Ta x” on page eleven of the decree.

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s final decree of divorce. The costs

incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed eighty percent against Billy George

Kemp and twenty percent against Sharon Anne Kemp.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 11773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, March 19, 2014; 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Atomic Testing Museum, 755 E. Flamingo Road, Las 
Vegas, Nevada 89119.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Ulmer, Board Administrator, 
232 Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 
630-0522; Fax (702) 295-5300 or Email: NSSAB@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

1. Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Baseline Prioritization Briefing--Work Plan 
Item 6
2. Recommendation Development for FY 2016 Baseline Prioritization--Work 
Plan Item 6
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Barbara Ulmer at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Barbara Ulmer at the telephone number listed above. The request 
must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments can do so during the 15 
minutes allotted for public comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Barbara Ulmer at 
the address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 25, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-04602 Filed 2-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Yakman, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Vogt, J.), rendered June 12, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.

Defendant’s only contention on appeal is that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial in violation of CPL 30.30. Defendant’s right to appellate review on this claim, however, has been waived by virtue of the fact that he pleaded guilty *(see, People v Gooden,*151 AD2d 773; *see also, People v O’Brien,*56 NY2d 1009, 1010).

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                              EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2002



<S>                                                                              <C>
Net income
                                                                                 $  112,493
                                                                                 ==========

Average shares outstanding                                                          560,318

Basic earnings per share                                                         $     0.20
                                                                                 ==========


Average shares outstanding                                                          560,318

Dilutive average shares outstanding under
  warrants and options                                                              263,800

Exercise price                                                                   $    10.00

Assumed proceeds on exercise                                                     $2,638,000

Average market value                                                             $    10.35

Less:  Treasury stock purchased with assumed proceeds
       from exercise of warrants and options                                        254,879

Adjusted average shares - diluted                                                   569,239

Diluted earnings per share                                                       $     0.20
                                                                                 ==========
</TABLE>

     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  value  is  derived from trades with one broker.  Private sales may occur
where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.


<PAGE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00117-CR

Mario Martinez Gonzalez a/k/a Mario Gonzalez Martinez a/k/a Mario Martinez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-DCR-145

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 16, 2024
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION
                   Pursuant to 18 United States Code ss. 1350


     The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Third Quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Fisher Scientific International
Inc. (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Kevin P. Clark
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kevin P. Clark
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     November 14, 2003
EX-10.14.1



 Exhibit 10.14.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT 
 This
First Amendment to the Lease Agreement (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 12, 2016, by and between Daniel Island Executive Center, LLC (herein “Lessor”) and Benefitfocus.com, Inc. (herein
“Lessee”). The Lessor and Lessee may be referred to herein collectively as the “Parties” and either one of them may be referred to herein as a “Party”. 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated May 31, 2005 (“Lease”), pursuant to which Lessor leased to Lessee
and Lessee leased from Lessor such space identified as Exhibits C and D of the Lease and is now commonly known as 100 Benefitfocus Way – Headquarters; and 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee now to desire to amend the Lease term. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for concessions made by DIEC II, LLC to Lessee for waiver of the 2016 Carrying Costs and Termination Fees for the Lease
Options #1 and #2 for BF4 and the Welcome Center (BF5) and the extension of the Option Period of Option #2 (Welcome Center/BF5), as further described in the “FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT” between DIEC II, LLC and Lessee),
Lessor and Lessee agree as follows: 
 1. Base Term . The Base Term of the Lease, as defined in Article I 1.05, shall be extended and end on
December 31, 2031. 
 2. Co-Terminus Lease Term. In the event the Lessor and Lessee enter into a
new Lease for development of BF4 or BF5/”Welcome Center” on the adjacent property to the Demised Premises during the Initial Term of this Lease, the Initial Term shall reset upon the Lease Commencement Date of BF4 or BF5/”Welcome
Center” respectively to be Co-Terminus with the Initial Term of the BF4 or BF5/”Welcome Center” lease. 
  

	*	All other provisions of the Lease remain in full force and affect. 

 SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in their respective names by
their duly authorized representatives, executing this instrument in triplicate originals, as of the day and year first above written. 
  

							
	IN THE PRESENCE OF:	 		  		  	
			
		 		  	Lessor: Daniel Island Executive Center, LLC
				
	  
	 		  	By:	  	 /s/ Chad Colman

	Witness	 		  	Print Name: Chad Colman
		 		  	Its: Authorized Agent
	  
	 		  	
	Witness	 		  		  	
			
		 		  	Date of Execution: December 12, 2016
			
		 		  	Lessee: Benefitfocus.com, Inc.
				
	  
	 		  	By:	  	 /s/ Jeff LaBorde

	Witness	 		  	Print Name: Jeff LaBorde
		 		  	Its: CFO
	  
	 		  		  	
	Witness	 		  	
			
		 		  	Date of Execution: December 12, 2016
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23









                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS




POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.


We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 8, 2001 into
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and into
the following Registration Statements:

     -    Registration Statement No. 33-37855 on Form S-8
     -    Registration Statement No. 333-19215 on Form S-8
     -    Registration Statement No. 333-93773 on form S-8
     -    Registration Statement No. 333-27685 on Form S-3
     -    Registration Statement No. 33-53531 on Form S-8
     -    Registration Statement No. 33-57920 on Form S-3DPOS


[signature]

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

March 27, 2001
# C_2021471EN.01003901.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Covestro Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-745/18) (1)

(State aid - Aid scheme implemented by Germany in favour of certain large electricity consumers - Exemption from network charges for the period 2012 — 2013 - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted - Action for annulment - Time limit for bringing an action - Admissibility - Definition of aid - State resources - Equal treatment - Legitimate expectations)

(2021/C 471/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Covestro Deutschland AG (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: M. Küper, J. Otter, C. Anger and M. Goldberg, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, R. Kanitz, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/56 of 28 May 2018 of 7 May 2015 on the State aid SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany to baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 StromNEV (OJ 2019 L 14, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The application is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed;

| 2. | Covestro Deutschland AG is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Covestro Deutschland AG is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82 of 4.3.2019.

---
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q/A-1 (the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Leong Hin
Chua President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company



/s/ Leong Hin Chua
-------------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2010