alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018134EN.01003301.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/33

---

Action brought on 16 February 2018 — DeepMind Technologies v EUIPO (STREAMS)

(Case T-97/18)

(2018/C 134/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DeepMind Technologies Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. St Quintin, barrister, K. Gilbert and G. Lodge, solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark STREAMS — Application for registration No 15 166 176

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2017 in Case R 35/2017-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision because it infringes Article 7 EUTMR, alternatively; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision because it infringes Article 7 EUTMR, alternatively;

| — | annul the contested decision on the same basis; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision on the same basis;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1004 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1004

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
         observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Day Moment of Silence 
Act''.
SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF VETERANS DAY.
    (a) Two Minutes of Silence.--Chapter 1 of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 145. Veterans Day
    ``The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling on the 
people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on 
Veterans Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of veterans 
throughout the history of the Nation, beginning at--
        ``(1) 3:11 p.m. Atlantic standard time;
        ``(2) 2:11 p.m. eastern standard time;
        ``(3) 1:11 p.m. central standard time;
        ``(4) 12:11 p.m. mountain standard time;
        ``(5) 11:11 a.m. Pacific standard time;
        ``(6) 10:11 a.m. Alaska standard time; and
        ``(7) 9:11 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian standard time.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``145. Veterans Day.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoMajor Projects
Accessible Pathway for the Capitol Campus
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
    U.S. Capitol Grounds

Status
    CompletedThe Architect of the Capitol continues to improve the accessible pathway for the Capitol campus.

The Architect of the Capitol's work to improve the accessible pathway for the Capitol campus and meet standards set by the Americans with Disabilities Act. Work around the House, Senate and Library buildings is complete.
          
    
      

      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2021349EN.01002701.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Saab Halabi v Council

(Case T-249/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Venezuela - Freezing of funds - Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration - Right to effective judicial protection - Error of assessment)

(2021/C 349/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tarek William Saab Halabi (Caracas, Venezuela) (represented by: L. Giuliano and F. Di Gianni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou, V. Piessevaux, P. Mahnič and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/90 of 22 January 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 16 I, p. 14) and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1656 of 6 November 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 276, p. 10) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/88 of 22 January 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 16 I, p. 6), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1653 of 6 November 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 276, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Tarek William Saab Halabi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Tarek William Saab Halabi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.

---
# C_2020390EN.01000802.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — XT v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

(Case C-312/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/112/EC - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Article 9(1) - Article 193 - Concept of ‘taxable person’ - Joint activity agreement - Partnership - Allocation of an economic transaction to one of the partners - Determination of the taxable person liable for the tax)

(2020/C 390/11)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XT

Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) and Article 193 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a natural person who has concluded with another natural person a joint activity agreement setting up a partnership, which lacks legal personality and is characterised by the fact that the first person is empowered to act in the name of the partners as a whole, but participates alone and in his or her own name in relations with third parties when performing acts that form the economic activity pursued by that partnership, must be regarded as a ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of Article 9(1) of Directive 2006/112 and as having sole liability for the value added tax payable under Article 193 of that directive, since he or she acts on his or her own behalf or on behalf of another person as a commission agent as provided for in Article 14(2)(c) and Article 28 of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 1.7.2019.

---
#### Anthony GOMEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-6340.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2005.

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Anthony Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*449Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Gomez seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s orders dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration.* An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability mil not issue absent *“a*substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment *of*his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gomez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael E. Hofmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael E. Hofmann

----------------------

Michael E. Hofmann

Chief Financial Officer



April 14, 2004





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in the typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 9 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 6, 2015. 

Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of 

daily meeting of the House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon 

on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 

Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2020201EN.01005501.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/55

---

Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — Sensient Colors Europe v Commission

(Case T-556/18) (1)

(2020/C 201/70)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
March 19, 2013

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 13-06

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Richard E. Hill, Jr. /s/ Byron E. Rippke, for

Director

Center for Veterinary Biologics

SUBJECT: Reporting Inactivation Test Results on APHIS Forms 2008 for Inactivated 

Veterinary Biological Products with the Restriction “For Further 

Manufacture (FFM)”

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Notice is to inform licensees, permittees, and applicants that the 

Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) now requires the reporting of inactivation 

confirmation test results on APHIS Forms 2008. This Notice applies only to inactivated

products that have the license restriction “For Further Manufacture” (FFM) and that have 

an Outline of Production requirement for inactivation, including autogenous products and 

prelicense products that will be given the FFM restriction upon licensure.

II. BACKGROUND

The CVB is committed to ensuring inactivated veterinary biological products are safe to 

ship. Currently there are FFM products prepared from animal pathogens, some of which 

are zoonotic. Previously, the CVB has not required the results of inactivation 

confirmation testing to be reported on the APHIS Form 2008. This reporting will aid in 

ensuring safe shipment of the product and is provided for under 9 CFR 114.3(d), 113.10,

and 103.3(b).

III. ACTION 

Manufacturers shall specify the inactivation confirmation test, the test validity criteria, 

the criteria for satisfactory results, and the date the inactivation validation report was 

accepted by the CVB in Section V of the Outline of Production. For products licensed 

prior to the date of this Notice, the acceptance date may be the date of the Outline in 

effect at the time of licensure. Manufacturers may contact their reviewer for guidance.

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection 

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue 

PO Box 844 

Ames, IA 50010 

(515) 337- 6100

Safeguarding American Agriculture

Federal Relay Service

APHIS is an agency of USDA’s Marketing and Regulatory Programs (Voice/TTY/ASCII/Spanish)

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 1-800-877-8339
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 13-06

Page 2

Requests for release of inactivated FFM product (licensed or in prelicense) to be shipped 

between licensed entities shall report the results of inactivation confirmation testing on 

APHIS Form 2008, as applicable.

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY

For reporting inactivation test results on the APHIS Form 2008, this change is effective 

from the date of this Notice.

For Outlines of Production, the change is effective by the time of the next annual review 

or prior to licensure, as applicable.

For products still in prelicense status as of the date of this Notice, CVB acceptance of an 

inactivation validation report (or exemption therefrom) is required prior to licensure. 

Manufacturers should contact their reviewers for guidance.
# C_2010051EN.01000701.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca — Spain) — Eva Martín Martín v EDP Editores SL

(Case C-227/08) (1)

1

(Directive 85/577/EEC - Article 4 - Consumer protection - Contracts negotiated away from business premises - Right of cancellation - Obligation on the trader to give notice of that right - Contract void - Appropriate measures)

2010/C 51/10

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eva Martín Martín

Applicant:

Defendant: EDP Editores SL

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca — Interpretation of Article 4 of Council Directive 85/577/EEC of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises (OJ 1985 L 372, p. 31) — Articles 3 EC, 95 EC and 153 EC — Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right of renunciation — Obligation on the trader to supply certain information — Consumer protection measures in case of non-performance — Nullity of contract and jurisdiction of national court

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4 of Council Directive 85/577/EEC of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises does not preclude a national court from declaring, of its own motion, that a contract falling within the scope of that directive is void on the ground that the consumer was not informed of his right of cancellation, even though the consumer at no stage pleaded that the contract was void before the competent national courts.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
Bladen

Cumberland

Pender

Robeson

Sampson

Horry

Marion

USDA APHIS

2150 Centre Ave

Fort Collins, CO 80526

Data Source:

Esri, USDA APHIS PPQ

These data, and all the information contained therein, have been collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and

Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), or by its cooperators on APHIS’ behalf, for restricted government purposes only and is

the sole property of APHIS. See full disclaimer: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/help/data-disclaimer

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

2023 Witchweed Regulated Areas

Released Sites (Regulatory surveys to confirm seedbank depletion)

Infested Sites (Witchweed is present and under eradication)

SC Witchweed Counties

NC Witchweed Counties

0 10 20

Miles

0 10 20

Kilometers

Date Created:

11/8/2023

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

NC Infested 86 1098.7

NC Released 124 1290.1

SC Infested 18 246.4

SC Released 40 685.1

State Site Type Count Acres
Item_4_2_5_ New chapter on Nipah virus encephalitis (Chapter 8.Y.) / page 1

Item_4_2_5_ New chapter on Nipah virus encephalitis (Chapter 8.Y.) / page 3

Annex 30

**USA COMMENT IN RED FONT**

CHAPTER 8.Y.**INFECTION WITH NIPAH VIRUS**

Article 8.Y.1.

General provisions

Pigs, horses, bats, and humans can be affected by Nipah virus, a member of the family *Paramyxoviridae, genus Henipavirus.* For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, *infection* with Nipah virus is defined as an *infection* of horses and pigs (hereafter ‘susceptible animal’) with Nipah virus.

**RATIONALE:** For clarity about the disease. 

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with Nipah virus:

1)	Nipah virus has been isolated and identified as such in a sample from a susceptible animal; or 

2)	antigen or nucleic acid specific to Nipah virus has been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with Nipah virus, epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*, or giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with Nipah virus; or

3)	seroconversion specific to Nipah virus, which is not the consequence of *vaccination*, has been detected in a susceptible animal; or

4)	antibodies specific to Nipah virus, which are not the consequence of *vaccination*, have been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*, or giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with Nipah virus.

Standards for diagnosis and vaccines, as well as information on the epidemiology, are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*. 

____________________________

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023	1

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023*

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023*
IV 

House Calendar No. 158 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 933 

[Report No. 114–838] 

Providing amounts for further expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, from the Committee on House Administration, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar 

and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for further expenses of the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For further expenses of the Committee on Energy 

4 and Commerce (hereafter in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘Committee’’) for the One Hundred Fourteenth Con6 gress, there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives not more than $800,000. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 933 RH 

1 SEC. 2. VOUCHERS. 

2 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

3 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

4 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

5 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

6 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

7 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

8 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

9 the Committee on House Administration. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 158 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 933 

[Report No. 114–838] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for further expenses of the 

Hundred Fourteenth Congress. Committee on Energy and Commerce in the One 

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS