alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis P. Calvert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    DENNIS P. CALVERT
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Dennis P. Calvert                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

I, Charles K. Dargan II, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CHARLES K. DARGAN II
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | Charles K. Dargan II   
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2009113EN.01001601.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/16

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België — Belgium) — UDV North America Inc v Brandtraders NV

(Case C-62/08) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d) - Right of the proprietor of a registered mark to prevent the use by a third party of a sign which is identical to the mark - Concept of ‘use’ - Use of a sign which is identical to the mark by a trade intermediary in its business papers - Intermediary acting in its own name but on behalf of a vendor)

2009/C 113/31

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UDV North America Inc

Applicant:

Defendant: Brandtraders NV

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Cassatie van België — Interpretation of Article 9(1) and 2(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) — Right of the proprietor of a mark to oppose its use by a third party — Concept of use of the mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The concept of ‘use’ for the purpose of Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark covers a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a trade intermediary, which is acting in its own name but on behalf of the vendor and is thus not an interested party in relation to trade in goods in which it is itself a contractual party, uses, in its business papers, a sign which is identical with a Community trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which the mark is registered.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from March 31,
2000 - 10Q Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      15,892,563
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            18,750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 69,711,216
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,450,729
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,301,791
<LOANS>                                    251,313,006
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,804,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             375,581,391
<DEPOSITS>                                 304,979,291
<SHORT-TERM>                                19,615,160
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,884,838
<LONG-TERM>                                 17,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,279,456
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,822,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             375,581,391
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,582,783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,251,095
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,833,878
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,895,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,258,777
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,575,101
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  258,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (28,517)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,734,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,388,935
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,388,935
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   909,735
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,167,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   375,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,591,613
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   75,645
<RECOVERIES>                                    30,145
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,804,113
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,804,113
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 32 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 88426)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-110, CP2024-115.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28047 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997  
<CASH>                                          2,554  
<SECURITIES>                                        0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,466  
<ALLOWANCES>                                      183  
<INVENTORY>                                    11,282  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,568  
<PP&E>                                         49,375  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,290  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 86,658  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,476  
<BONDS>                                        27,390  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0  
<PREFERRED>                                         0  
<COMMON>                                          638  
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,496  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   86,658  
<SALES>                                        33,618  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               50,488  
<CGS>                                          23,491  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36,110  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,861  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,913  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,604  
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,365  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0  
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0  
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,541  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.41  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.41  
                                               



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATE



As required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, (as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002), I certify that:



•

the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



•

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/ Carl Lanzisera

Carl Lanzisera

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 30, 2004
Imported Fire Ant Regulated Articles

7 CFR § 301.82-2 

Last update: December 29, 2022

a. Imported fire ant queens and reproducing colonies of imported fire ants[1]. 

b. Soil,[2] separately or with other articles, except potting soil that is shipped in original containers in 

which the soil was placed after commercial preparation. 

c. Baled hay and baled straw stored in direct contact with the ground; 

d. Plants and sod with roots and soil attached, except plants maintained indoors in a home or office 

environment and not for sale; 

e. Used soil-moving equipment, unless removed of all noncompacted soil; and 

f. Any other article or means of conveyance when: 

1. An inspector determines that it presents a risk of spread of the imported fire ant due to its 

proximity to an infestation of the imported fire ant; and

2. The person in possession of the product, article, or means of conveyance has been notified that it 

is regulated under this subpart.

[1] Permit and other requirements for the interstate movement of imported fire ants are contained in part

330 of this chapter. 

[2] The movement of soil from Puerto Rico is subject to additional provisions in part 330 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence R. Hoffman, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ LAWRENCE R. HOFFMAN                                                         
|Lawrence R. Hoffman                                                             
|Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

March 28, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Feliciano, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.), *179rendered October 3, 1989, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738) in which she moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the motion is granted, Susan Bloch Marhoffer is relieved as attorney for the defendant, and she is directed to turn over all papers in her possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that David Glovin, 50 Lexington Ave., New York, N.Y. 10010 is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the People are directed to furnish a copy of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the defendant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order and the People shall serve and file their brief within 120 days of the date of this decision and order; by prior decision and order of this court, the defendant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers (including the typewritten stenographic minutes) and on the typewritten briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

Based upon this court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that at least one nonfrivolous issue exists. At the *Wade*hearing, testimony established that the defendant was identified by an eyewitness to the crime at a station house showup. Because New York courts frown upon police station showup identifications of arrested persons, holding them to be inadmissible as a matter of law unless there is an adequate showing of exigency *(People v Riley,*70 NY2d 523), the showup at the station house presents a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Under the circumstances, the motion of the defendant’s assigned counsel to be relieved is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned *(see, People v Casiano,*67 NY2d 906; *People v Woodham,*153 AD2d 599). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
# C_2020061EN.01003201.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Japan Tobacco v EUIPO — I.J. Tobacco Industry (I.J. TOBACCO INDUSTRY)

(Case T-743/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark I.J. TOBACCO INDUSTRY - Earlier EU figurative mark JTi - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 61/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Japan Tobacco, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and R. Ahijón Lana, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska, J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: I.J. Tobacco Industry FZE (Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: A.-E. Malami, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2018 (Case R 979/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Japan Tobacco and I.J. Tobacco Industry.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Japan Tobacco, Inc., to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by I.J. Tobacco Industry FZE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Japan Tobacco, Inc., to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by I.J. Tobacco Industry FZE.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.1



VERTEL CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Vertel Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc E. Maassen, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 15, 2003 |  | /s/ MICHAEL A. STERNBERG             
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | Michael A. Sternberg                 
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vertel Corporation and will be retained by Vertel Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019423EN.01003501.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Roxtec v EUIPO — Wallmax (Representation of a black square containing seven concentric blue circles)

(Case T-261/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative trade mark depicting a black square containing seven concentric blue circles - Absolute ground for refusal - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 423/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Roxtec AB (Karlskrona, Sweden) (represented by: J. Olsson and J. Adamsson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek and H. O’Neill, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wallmax Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Ferrari and L. Goglia, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 January 2018 (Case R 940/2017-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Wallmax and Roxtec.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Roxtec AB to pay its own costs along with those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Roxtec AB to pay its own costs along with those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Wallmax Srl to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Wallmax Srl to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---