alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018104EN.01005101.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/51

---

Action brought on 29 January 2018 — Novenco Building & Industry v EUIPO — Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) (NOVENCO)

(Case T-45/18)

(2018/C 104/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novenco Building & Industry A/S (Næstved, Denmark) (represented by: A. Rasmussen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) Co. Ltd (Beijing, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative sign ‘NOVENCO’ – International registration designating the European Union No 1 187 938

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2017 in Case R 2354/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partly annul the contested decision, namely for the goods of class 7 as covered by IR 1187938; |
| --- | --- |

—

partly annul the contested decision, namely for the goods of class 7 as covered by IR 1187938;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs as well as the third party’s costs, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs as well as the third party’s costs, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
# C_2020414EN.01000701.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Exter BV

(Case C-330/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Community Customs Code - Article 121(1) - Inward processing procedure - Release for free circulation - Incurrence of a customs debt - Determination of the debt - Concept of ‘taxation elements’ - Taking account of a preferential tariff measure)

(2020/C 414/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: Exter BV

Operative part of the judgment

Article 121(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code must be interpreted as precluding the application of a preferential tariff measure leading to a reduced rate of customs duty, which was in force at the time of acceptance of the declaration of placing of goods under the inward processing procedure, but which was suspended at the date of acceptance of the declaration of release of those goods for free circulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.

---
# C_2020271EN.01001002.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Vodafone Portugal — Comunicações Pessoais SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-43/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(c) - Scope - Taxable transactions - Services supplied for consideration - Monies paid where customers fail to comply with the contractual tie-in period - Characterisation)

(2020/C 271/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vodafone Portugal — Comunicações Pessoais SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that amounts received by an economic operator in the event of early termination, for reasons specific to the customer, of a services contract requiring compliance with a tie-in period in exchange for granting that customer advantageous commercial conditions, must be considered to constitute the remuneration for a supply of services for consideration, within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20099

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH LINCOLN MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:04-CR-7-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kenneth Lincoln

Martin raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a

Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm

statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1074 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 

National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. PETERS, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and 

New England National Scenic Trails as units of the 

National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Scenic Trails 

5 Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

7 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1074 IS

1 inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System’’ before 

2 the period at the end. 

3 SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third 

6 and fourth sentences and inserting ‘‘The trail shall be ad7 ministered by the Secretary of the Interior as a unit of 

8 the National Park System.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

10 Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act 

11 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence 

12 by inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System,’’ 

13 after ‘‘administer the trail’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      406
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (94)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,571
<PP&E>                                           3,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,092)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,313
<COMMON>                                        55,620
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,601)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,081
<SALES>                                          1,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,750
<CGS>                                            3,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.69)


</TABLE>
# C_2018341EN.01002701.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/27

---

Action brought on 7 August 2018 — Užstato sistemos administratorius v EUIPO — DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem (Representation of a bottle and an arrow)

(Case T-477/18)

(2018/C 341/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Užstato sistemos administratorius VšĮ (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: I. Lukauskienė, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of a bottle and an arrow) — Application for registration No 14 481 519

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2018 in Case R 2203/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in the part that found that the Opposition Division’s decision of 21 August 2017 that the signs produced a different overall impression which would exclude a likelihood of confusion is annulled and to remain valid the decision of Opposition Division of 21 August 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in the part that found that the Opposition Division’s decision of 21 August 2017 that the signs produced a different overall impression which would exclude a likelihood of confusion is annulled and to remain valid the decision of Opposition Division of 21 August 2017;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article (8) (1) (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article (8) (1) (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Order entered January 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00340
- CR
JANINE JOYCE CHARBON EAU, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 006
- 80751
- 2012



### O RDER
The Court DENIE S appellant’s July 11, 2013 motion to appoint counsel. The trial court conducted a hearing and made findings that appellant is not indigent. The Court adopted those findings and denied several motions to reconsider. Appellant must either retain counsel to represent her in the appeal or proceed on her own. We note that appellant’s brief wad due by January 2, 2014, and has not yet been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file her brief within THIR TY DAYS of the date of this order. If appellant’s brief is not filed within the time specified, we will, without further notice, submit the appeal without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b), Lott v. State , 874 S.W.2d 687 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, Joyce

Charboneau and John Rolater, Collin County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Page 1

NCAH PORTAL CVB QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

Biologics Sample Submissions - (APHIS 2020) “Generate Packing Slip”

Next: Generating Packing Slips. 

Only users with the Sampler Role 

can enter sample information 

and generate Packing Slips to be 

shipped with samples.

For all types of sample submissions, start by 

entering the CVB section of the Portal and then 

navigating to the Generate Packing Slip hyperlink.

You will be taken to the APHIS 2020 Packing Slip Page.

 Before generating a packing slip, the sample 

details must be entered in for the APHIS 

Form 2020 information. 

 APHIS 2020 records will be held in the portal 

for 60 days, after which they are purged.

8

Publication Date: 1/4/2017
Page 2

NCAH PORTAL CVB QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

Biologics Sample Submissions - (APHIS 2020) “Generate Packing Slip”

Next: Processed Samples Section

6. Include packing slip with sample shipment.

8

3. Select the check-boxes next to desired submissions to generate a packing slip for samples to be shipped.

Click here to Generate the packing slip.

The Sample Code is not 

provided until the sample has been 

received and verified by the CVB.

5. Print packing slip.

Publication Date: 1/4/2017
Page 3

NCAH PORTAL CVB QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

Biologics Sample Submissions - (APHIS 2020) “Generate Packing Slip”

Publication Date: 1/4/2017

8

Processed Samples

Processed Samples area is a view of packing slips that have already been generated by the firm within the 

Generate Packing Slip link; however, they are yet to be processed by the CVB. 

Actions in this area work the same as those in Generate Packing Slip. The user may click on the Info link to view 

the information for the selected sample, or re-print packing slips.

Remember: Sample Information may not be edited, after it has been saved; but the user may deleted the 

information and re-enter.

Samples entered and verified by CVB will automatically remove the entry from Processed Samples Area. 

Samples, with the provided Sample Code, will be found in Account Details
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Canal Electric Company for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016906
<NAME> CANAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          274,438
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          3,075
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              31,497
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            27,187
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     336,197
<COMMON>                            38,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            8,321
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 53,130
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      99,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                83,917
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  20,850
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          350
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>         11,227
<LEASES-CURRENT>                       574
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     119,748
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      336,197
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          214,123
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 9,178
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         181,582
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         190,760
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             23,363
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     468
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      23,831
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             9,003
<NET-INCOME>                        14,828
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       14,828
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            14,318
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            7,910
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              35,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, W. Edd Helms, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the company.

Date: October 15, 2006         /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      ------------------       ----------------------
                               W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief
                                                  Executive Officer

         October 15, 2006      /s/  Dean A. Goodson
      ------------------       --------------------
                               Dean A. Goodson, Chief Financial Officer

         October 15, 2006      /s/  L. Wade Helms
      ------------------       ------------------
                               L. Wade Helms, Executive Vice President
ANTONELLI 

Drone/UAS Practice Group 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

LAW 

35 E Wacker Drive 

Suite 1875 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Tel. 312.201.8310 

Jcffrev((i;Antonelli-Law.com 

·---·--~--

October 19,2015 

Re: Amendment to NWB Environmental Services, LLC's Petition for Exemption. 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4286-0001. 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

We are writing regarding the address of our client, NWB Environmental Services, LLC 

("NWB"). When we had filed their petition, NWB had been located at 3033 5th Avenue, Suite 227, 

San Diego, CA 92103. They have since moved, and are now located in Suite 210 at the same 

address. The full address of our client is now: 

NWB Environmental Services, LLC 

3033 5th Avenue, Suite 210 

San Diego, CA 92103. 

We request that you update NWB's Petition for Exemption, under Docket No. FAA-2015-

4286-0001, to reflect NWB's new location. 

If we can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-

201-8310 or via email at Jeffrev(a)Antonelli-Law.com. 

Attorneys for NWB Enviro 

1
Howard P. O[sen, §r.* 

John F. Simmons 

Rick L. Ediger 

John A. Seizer 

Steven vV. Olsen 

Kent A. Hadenfelclt 

Andrea D. Miller 

John L. Selzer 

Adam A. Hoesing 

Leslie A. Shaver** 

Jonathan C. Hunzeker* 

Elizabeth A. Stobd 

*Also admitted in 'Wyoming 

**Also aclmiuedl in Colorado 

Mr. Michael F. Martin 

A11:11:orneys a11: Law 

1502 Second A venue 

Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69361-31741, 

(308) 632-3811 ' i 

Fax (308) 635-0907 

Website: www. simmonsolsen.com 

E-mail: jaselzer@simmonsolsen.com 

November 7, 2014 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

.~- -----,_ 

~- , ·' ~--

RE: Western Nebraska Regional Airport, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 

Dear Mr. Martin, 

Robert G. Simmons, Jr. 

{1918-1998) 

ALLIANCE OfFICE 

1320 West yct Street 

Alliance, NE 69301 

(308) 761-0474 

Please Direct All 

Correspondence to 

Scottsbluff Office 

Simmons Olsen Law Firm, P.C. is a twelve-attorney law firm located in Scottsbluff, 

Nebraska, serving western Nebraska and eastern Wyoming. The Firm's attorneys travel on a regular 

basis for clients and leisure. Western Nebraska Regional Airport serves this Firm in that regard, 

connecting directly to national and international flights from Denver International Airport. We 

understand how Western Nebraska Regional Airport serves this community, as we are able to see 

first-hand the Airport's interaction with, service to, and reputation amongst the local residents. This 

Firm also understands the services provided by Western Nebraska Regional Airport are largely 

dependent upon performance of its Essential Air Service provider. 

Please accept this letter of support for the Essential Air Service bid that Western Nebraska 

Regional Airport proposes to accept with Aerodynamics Inc. The services and the schedule provided 

in the bid are crucial to the economic development of Scottsbluff and the surrounding area. The 

services to be provided will provide economic benefits by delivering to our business community a 

dependable and meaningful flight schedule to Denver International Airport. It will allow Western 

Nebraska Regional Airport the continued ability to build and maintain a repeat-customer base year 

after year and to continue to meet an important need of this community. 

Very truly yours, 

SIMMONS OLSEN LAW FIRM, P.C. 

JAS/slk
#### State v. Antonio

16567

1/18/95

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. GARAMENDI:
       H.R. 6216.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8
```