alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE 15-08

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron Rippke

CVB Director

SUBJECT: Changes to the Administrative Inspection Review Program

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this memorandum is to inform interested parties of the changes 

and reimplementation of the Center for Veterinary Biologics’ Administrative 

Inspection Review (AIR) program. 

II. BACKGROUND

The AIR is designed to assist the Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB), 

licensees, and permittees in maintaining accurate records, facilitate more efficient 

on-site inspections, and enhance regulatory compliance between the licensed 

entities and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). It also 

helps provide transparency between the CVB and licensed firms. The CVB 

requests information from the licensees and permittees for the AIR program in 

accordance with Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (9 CFR), part 116.5(a). 

The AIR process was suspended October 1, 2012, due to lack of resources 

available in the CVB to evaluate the reviews. Based on these previous 

experiences and a re-alignment of resources, the CVB is resuming the AIR 

process. 

III. ACTION 

The CVB will institute a rotation of AIR documentation that licensed 

manufacturers or permittees will complete and submit to the CVB. The AIR 

documents will be electronically provided to the liaison of each licensed 

establishment for review. Each establishment will receive one AIR regardless of 

the number of locations. The firms will review the information for completeness, 

verify for accuracy, attach any necessary paperwork, and return to the CVB 

within the specified time frame of 60 calendar days through electronic means 

provided by the CVB. Requests for extensions may be submitted to the CVB, 

Inspection and Compliance.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

BYRON 

RIPPKE

Digitally signed by BYRON RIPPKE 

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, 

ou=Department of Agriculture, 

cn=BYRON RIPPKE, 

0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=120010000

04093 

Date: 2015.06.10 07:38:06 -05'00'
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 15-08

Page 2

The AIR will consist of between 7 and 14 documents, depending on the year. An example of 

one of these documents is a listing of the manufacturer’s active labels on file with the CVB.

Each document will be accompanied by a detailed list of directions explaining what is 

expected and any documentation required by the CVB for completion. 

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY

This change is effective with the date of this Notice.

 An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
October 9, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PINNACLE PREMIER PROPERTIES, INC. AND PINNACLE REALTY 

ADVISORS, INC, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00194-CV V.

GHISLAIN BRETON, CATHERINE DENICOURT AND DAVID ANDREIS, 

Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the order granting temporary injunction in favor 

of appellees, Ghislain Breton, Catherine Denicourt and David Andreis, signed 

March 4, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find the trial court erred in granting the order. We therefore order the 

temporary injunction order of the court below REVERSED and RENDER

judgment denying appellees’ request for a temporary injunction. 

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellees, Ghislain Breton, Catherine Denicourt and David Andreis.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2008037EN.01002402.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/24

---

Action brought on 26 November 2007 — Gebr. Heller Maschinenfabrik v OHIM — Fernández Martinez (HELLER)

(Case T-431/07)

(2008/C 37/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Gebr. Heller Maschinenfabrik (Nürtingen, Germany) (represented by: W. Kessler and S. Baur, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manuel Fernández Martinez (Alicante, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2007 in Case R 974/2006-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2007 in Case R 974/2006-2;

| — | Dismiss the opposition of the other party before the Second Board of Appeal, Manuel Fernández Martinez; |
| --- | --- |

—

Dismiss the opposition of the other party before the Second Board of Appeal, Manuel Fernández Martinez;

| — | Order the other party before the Board of Appeal, Manuel Fernández Martinez, to pay the costs and fees of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal of OHIM and of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party before the Board of Appeal, Manuel Fernández Martinez, to pay the costs and fees of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal of OHIM and of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘HELLER’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 37 and 40 (application No 3 306 602).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Manuel Fernández Martinez.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish figurative mark ‘HELLER’ for goods in Class 7 (No 2 520 584).

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition and rejected the application.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), since there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2021217EN.01001302.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 — FV v Council of the European Union

(Case C-877/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Application for annulment - Civil service - Staff report - Assessment criteria - Consistency of output - Delays - Submission of a medical certificate - Duty of care)

(2021/C 217/18)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: FV (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders FV to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FV to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 77, 09.03.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1352-E1353]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         IN RECOGNITION OF THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF HIP HOUSING

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JACKIE SPEIER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Ms. SPEIER. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor an outstanding non-profit in 
San Mateo County, HIP Housing, on the occasion of its 40th Anniversary. 
This remarkable organization has assisted thousands of disadvantaged 
and disabled residents giving them shelter and the opportunity to turn 
their lives around.
   Because of HIP Housing, over 1,000 individuals per year have a place 
to call home which makes for 1,000 stories of transformed lives. These 
are the stories of struggling mothers with high school educations going 
back to school, under the guidance of HIP Housing, to earn a degree.
   HIP Housing's stories include those of families who, due to illness 
or a reduction in hours at work, injuries from an auto accident or 
dozens of other causes, cannot afford rent and are dangerously close to 
living on the street. HIP Housing offers a helping hand and a steady 
course to a secure future.
   The Home Sharing Program is a creative and effective way to match a 
home provider with a home seeker who pays rent or provides services. It 
cuts housing costs, promotes independence, provides companionship and 
increases security. Many strong friendships have started through the 
Home Sharing Program, and these friendships have transformed the lives 
of all involved.
   HIP Housing's Self-Sufficiency Program helps low-income families set 
clear goals to become financially self-reliant within one or two years 
while receiving housing assistance and support services. Attending a 
graduation ceremony of this program is certain to make one cry. A long 
line of graduates traipse up to the microphone and recount how they 
developed parenting skills, earned a degree and landed a job, or 
learned the skills to start a business. One woman this year reported 
that she had moved from being nearly homeless to getting her college 
degree, and onward to making over $80,000 per year in hospital 
administration, all with the help of HIP's counselors. The American 
Dream is alive at HIP Housing where housing is a right of everyone who 
wishes to work hard, and a need of all human beings who seek dignity.
   Mr. Speaker, I ask the House of Representatives to rise with me to 
honor the volunteers, staff, board members and foundations supporting 
HIP Housing. These are the quiet heroes who allow this organization to 
make San Mateo County a better place for all of us. HIP Housing is a 
shining example of what community service can be and can do to 
transform the world in which we live.

[[Page E1353]]

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Ibis Technology Corporation (the *“Company”*) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the *“Report”*), I, Martin J. Reid, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

Dated: May 22, 2008

 

 
| /s/ ***Martin J. Reid.***              |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Martin J. Reid                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
# C_2020137EN.01004402.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/44

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma v Szent Borbála Kórház

(Case C-491/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/66)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, John R. McKernan, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Education Management Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004
Exhibit 32.2



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Kevin T.
Thompson       
|Kevin T. Thompson           
|                            
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     
|February 23, 2006           





The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5295]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER

  The SPEAKER. The Chair will entertain up to 5 requests for 1-minute 
speeches on each side of the aisle.

                          ____________________
```
#### Stedman Energy, Inc., Respondent, v Lenape Resources Corporation et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant NUI Corporation, in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action by plaintiff for breach of contract and negligence arising out of a gas well-tending agreement between plaintiff and Lenape, defendants Lenape and NUI appeal from an order that denied their motions for summary judgment. NUI is entitled to summary judgment. NUI was not a party to the well-tending contract, nor did it provide well-tending services to plaintiff. There is no proof in the record that Lenape was a mere department, division, or alter ego of NUI, that Lenape was undercapitalized, or that there is any other basis for allowing plaintiff to pierce Lenape’s corporate veil in order to impose liability on NUI. Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, liability cannot be imposed against NUI merely *647because NUI and Lenape were coinsured under a liability policy.

Lenape’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The contractual exculpatory clause relied upon by Le-nape must be considered in light of other provisions of the contract, particularly paragraph II, which sets forth Lenape’s obligation to perform its services with due diligence and care. The contract is ambiguous insofar as it obligates Lenape to use due care but purports to exculpate it from the consequences of failure to do so. That ambiguity must be construed against the drafter, Lenape. The juxtaposition of those two provisions of the contract renders the exculpatory provision insufficiently clear and unambiguous to be enforced against plaintiff *(see, Gross v Sweet,*49 NY2d 102, 106-107; *Ciofalo v Tanney Gyms,*10 NY2d 294, 297).

We have considered Lenape’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: March 26 , 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Bill Lamason , EPA SUBJECT: March 2 6 , 2015 Webinar with C3 Energy , with EPA Participation from EPA,

RTP Offices
**SUMMARY** On March 2 6 , 2015, a webinar was held with EPA staff in RTP by the C3 Energy

Company

to discuss C3 Energy ’s energy management technologies applicable to the Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
. C3 Energy

– EPA RTP Webinar attendees , March 26 , 2015 **EPA ATTENDEES**  **:** Stacey Angel, El ys e Steiner, Peter Tsirigotis, Bill L amason **C 3 Energy**  **ATTENDEES (via phone)**  **:** Eileen Enriquez, Rob Jenks
#### State v. Silva

16407

1/12/95

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part and Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS </LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      12,867,155
<SECURITIES>                                 8,071,018
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,895,952
<PP&E>                                       3,876,394
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,772,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,166,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,848,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,709
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,322,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,166,288
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,872,802
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,870,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,997,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,997,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,997,369)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021044EN.01004101.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/41

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — PH, OI v ‘Eurobank Bulgaria’ AD

(Case C-745/19) (1)

(2021/C 44/55)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 33-80081, 333-33130, 333-47388, 333-70620, 333-98135and 333-108345) and Form S-3 (No. 333-125744) ofSilicon Storage Technology Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2006relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statementschedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, CaliforniaMarch 16, 2006

----
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Inspection - On Site Sampler Training and Portal Submission

CVB-REF-5105 01

CVB-REF

08 Mar 2021

Routed for review in ML 241666

CVB-Released