alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF ANDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 3rd

day of December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ROBERT LYNN PRIDGEN, Appellant

NO. 12-13-00136-CR; Trial Court No. 29956

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 29th day of July, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 912 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that congressional 

redistricting should be reformed to remove political gerrymandering. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. LOWENTHAL (for himself and Mr. RIBBLE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

congressional redistricting should be reformed to remove 

political gerrymandering. 

Whereas political gerrymandering occurs when politicians 

draw their own congressional district lines to protect 

their self-interest at the expense of creating districts that 

reflect communities of interest; 

Whereas political gerrymandering can result in decreased 

electoral competition between congressional candidates, 

and in turn decreased responsiveness by Members of 

Congress to their voters’ interests; 

Whereas political gerrymandering can be used to split or pack 

certain demographic and political groups into congressional districts in order to disproportionately diminish 

their representation in Congress; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 912 IH 

Whereas political gerrymandering can be used to protect the 

majority party and punish the minority party; 

Whereas political gerrymandering can decrease Americans’ 

faith and trust in congressional elections; 

Whereas political gerrymandering is generally harmful to our 

democracy; 

Whereas many States have taken great strides to ameliorate 

political gerrymandering, ranging from Hawaii and California to Arizona and Ohio; 

Whereas the United States Constitution provides the authority for Congress to regulate elections and redistricting; 

and 

Whereas the Supreme Court has affirmed Congress’ authority 

provided in the United States Constitution to regulate 

elections and redistricting: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that congressional redistricting should be re3 formed to remove political gerrymandering. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
# C_2020068EN.01001501.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave — Slovakia) — RN v Home Credit Slovakia a.s.

(Case C-290/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2008/48/EC - Consumer credit agreements - Article 10(2) - Information to be included in credit agreements - Annual percentage rate of charge - Lack of indication of the exact percentage of that rate of charge - Rate of charge expressed as a range between 21.5% and 22.4%)

(2020/C 68/13)

Language of the case: Slovakian

Referring court

Krajský súd v Trnave

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RN

Defendant: Home Credit Slovakia a.s.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 10(2)(g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, as amended by Commission Directive 2011/90/EU of 14 November 2011, must be interpreted as precluding, in a consumer credit agreement, the annual percentage rate of charge from being expressed not as a single rate but as a range referring to a minimum and a maximum rate.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2
CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I, A. Lee Miller, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSBBancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
46.
 

 

CSB BANCORP, INC.
a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: August 6, 2004    /s/ A. Lee Miller   A. Lee Miller Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
47.
# C_2019004EN.01003601.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/36

---

Action brought on 29 October 2018 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopimed)

(Case T-642/18)

(2019/C 4/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Faes Farma, SA (Lamiaco-Leioa, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Application for registration No 15 069 396

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2018 in Case R 1365/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the opposition and reject the contested application; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the opposition and reject the contested application;

| — | order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
February 1, 2001

22373

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
22157

#### State v. Gonzalez

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Special Needs Request

Last Modified: 

Print

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

(APHIS) has a formal process for States that want to impose additional restrictions

on the interstate movement of items that pose a plant health risk.

Under the Plant Protection Act, States or their political subdivisions can ask USDA for

permission to impose restrictions beyond what is required by APHIS. These are

called special need requests. 

Special need requests must be based on sound scientific data. They must include a

thorough risk assessment proving that the plant pest or noxious weed does not

currently exist in the State, but could cause economic or environmental harm. All

requests must be submitted to APHIS through State agriculture departments.

All special needs requests must be submitted to the deputy administrator for plant

protection and quarantine, USDA, APHIS, Jamie L. Whitten Federal Building, 14th St.

and Independence Ave., S.W., Room 301-E, Washington, D.C. 20250. Upon receipt of

the special need request, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register. The

public will have the opportunity to comment for 60 days following the publication.

Once the comment period closes, APHIS will review any comments and publish

another notice announcing its decision to either deny or grant the request. If the

request is granted, the special need exemption will be applicable for two years, after
which the State will have to submit a renewal request. If the request is denied, the

State may submit additional information for reconsideration.

Federal Register Final Rule (PDF; 75Kb)

[Docket No. APHIS-2005-0103]

Docket Details and Comments on Proposal

Process for Special Need Requests (PDF; 17Kb)
# State Plans and Strategies - Appalachian Regional Commission

- New York Strategy Statement The post New York Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
In addition to requirements for licensure of a conventional MS can be tested at CVB Lab

product, the biotech-derived product is characterized molecularly 

and shown to have low risk to animal safety, public health, and Add Test Authorization Number

the environment. 

Reviewer receives IBC Number

Biotech Product (>Master Seed or Cell tested by firm)

IBC Application CVB Lead CVB Director IBC Chair

SIF IBC Committee

(live 

MS) SIF review, CVB testing plan Laboratory + Reviewer approve MS

(if MS + safety studies satisfactory)

FRN, EA, CBI-redacted RA (if live product)

HHS RA Risk Assessment review for 

WS live or inactivated product Inactivation, nonviability (if killed product)

FONSI

Field Safety Trials (State Animal Health Official Approval)

License?

LEGEND

SIF = Summary Information Format

IBC = Institutional Biosafety Committee

MS = Master Seed

RA = Risk Analysis (SIF + Risk Assessment)

FRN = Federal Register Notice

EA = Environmental Assessment

CBI = Confidential Business Information–deleted

HHS = Health and Human Services: FDA/CDC/NIH

WS = APHIS Wildlife Services

FONSI = Finding of No Significant Impact

Regulatory Process for Biotech Products
# C_2020103EN.01002601.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Ruhorimbere v Council

(Case T-175/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Right to respect for private and family life - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality)

(2020/C 103/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Éric Ruhorimbere (Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, S. Lejeune and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Éric Ruhorimbere to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Éric Ruhorimbere to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
**Publicación en un blog**

**PROPAGUE EL MENSAJE, NO LAS PLAGAS**

¡Llegaron y con hambre! Y nos referimos a las especies invasoras. Estas plagas hambrientas se alimentan vorazmente, e infestan, la agricultura de los Estados Unidos, dañan nuestros parques y bosques, destruyen nuestros huertos y desequilibran nuestro ecosistema. Como no siempre tienen depredadores naturales, el número de las mismas puede llegar a ser muy alto si no se monitorea. De hecho, se estima que el impacto económico de las especies invasoras en los Estados Unidos excede $1 billón al año debido a la pérdida de ingresos y los costos de limpieza.

¿Qué puede hacer usted para ayudar a detener las plagas hambrientas? Como primer paso, prevenir su entrada. A continuación encontrará varias recomendaciones de fácil ejecución:

· **Compre leña local; encienda leña local.**Debido a que las plagas invasoras y las larvas pueden esconderse y recorrer largas distancias en la leña, compre la leña donde la encenderá.

· **Siembre con cuidado.**Compre las plantas de jardín en un proveedor confiable y evite por todos los medios usar especies de plantas invasoras.

· **No traiga o envíe por correo**frutas frescas, vegetales o plantas a su estado u otro estado, a menos que sean autorizadas con anterioridad por los inspectores agrícolas.

· **Coopere**con todas las restricciones impuestas bajo cuarentenas agrícolas y permita que los trabajadores agrícolas autorizados entren a su propiedad para realizar inspecciones de plagas o enfermedades.

· **Manténgalo limpio.**Lave el equipo para actividades al aire libre y las gomas de los vehículos entre los viajes de pesca, caza y campamento. Limpie los muebles de patio y los demás artículos de exterior al moverlos de una casa a otra.

· **Aprenda a identificarlas.**Si ve señales de una plaga invasora o de una enfermedad, anote o tome una foto de lo que esté viendo e infórmelo en www.HungryPests.com.

· **Provea la información.**Infórmeles todos los artículos agrícolas a los oficiales de aduana al regresar de viajes al extranjero. Llame al USDA para informarse sobre lo que está permitido: (301) 851-2046 para plantas; (301) 851-3300 para animales. Para más información, visite http://www.aphis.usda.gov/travel/.

Hable con sus amigos y vecinos sobre las plagas hambrientas. Y para más información, visite www.HungryPests.com.
No. 92-8262.

#### Morel *v.*Morel.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 6, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
131 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-98, CP2024-101.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-27409 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
November 2018 Webinar Question & Answers

During the ““Let’s Keep Our Poultry Together Defend Your Flock with Biosecurity Resources” 

webinar on November 28, 2018, USDA received the following questions through the chat 

function and social media. Responses to these questions are shared below.

Question 1:

If possible, please comment on how indoor, pet caged birds (non-poultry) should be handled 

during virulent Newcastle Disease mitigation (which is currently underway in California).

Answer 1:

Best management practices for indoor birds should resemble those for commercial birds. 

Please see helpful information on the APHIS webpage regarding the vND outbreak and how to 

protect your indoor caged pet birds: 

https://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_health/fs-vnd.pdf

Question 2:

How have outbreaks of salmonella started in backyard flocks?

Answer 2 (provided by CDC):

Before arriving at a feed store for purchase by consumers, live poultry originating at hatcheries 

in the United States might have Salmonella germs in their droppings and on their bodies 

(feathers, feet, and beaks), even when they appear healthy and clean. The germs can get on 

cages, coops, feed and water dishes, hay, plants, and soil in the area where the birds live and 

roam. People become infected with Salmonella germs when they put their hands in or around 

their mouth after touching these items without washing their hands. Germs on your hands can 

spread easily to other people or surfaces. People who have contact with items, like coops or 

water dishes, in the area where poultry live can get sick without actually touching one of the 

birds.

Question 3:

In the past, Biosecurity for the Birds produced beautiful, informational calendars. Are they 

available?

Answer 3:

The 2018 calendar was our last one. With the launch of the new Defend the Flock campaign, 

we are providing new resources. A series of biosecurity checklists is available on our website 

for download. Printed copies will be available in 2019. We hope you find these checklists 

informational and useful for protecting flocks from avian diseases.
hpilnote06_2816waiver.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing










 








AMENDMENT AND
WAIVER 


 


This Amendment
and Waiver made this 27th day of December, 2016 (the “Amendment”), by and
between Kodiak Capital Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Investor"),
and HPIL Holding, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), relates to
that Convertible Note entered into between the Company and Investor on June 28,
2016 (the "Note").  


 


WHEREAS, the
Note contains provisions which, if enforced, would place the Company in
default;   


 


WHEREAS,
Investor plans to provide the Company with additional funding;


 


WHEREAS, the
Investor desires to waive certain items which would constitute a default under
the Note; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and Investor desire to amend the Note as set forth below.







 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Investor hereby agree as follows:


 


1.      The Investor
waives any past or current default under the Note which arising from a violation
of Sections 8(a), 8(c), 8(i) or 8(j) of said Note.







 







2.      The parties
amend Section 8(i) of the Note to state “Shares of Common Stock shall cease to
be quoted on the OTC Link interdealer quotation system (including OTCQX, OTCQB and
OTCPink) for any reason and are not thereafter re-listed, re-traded or
re-quoted on another Principal Market within fifteen 15 trading days.”  







 







3.      The parties
delete Section 8(j) of the Note in its entirety.  


 


4.      The parties
amend the maturity date of the Note to July 28, 2017. 


 


5.      This Amendment
shall be binding on the parties’ successors and assigns. 


 


6.      This Amendment
may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which may be executed by less
than all of the parties and shall be deemed to be an original instrument which
shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts
and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment
may be delivered to the other parties hereto by email of a copy of this
Agreement bearing the signature of the parties so delivering this Agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Agreement to be duly executed by their respective officers thereunto duly
authorized as of the day and year first above written.


 


COMPANY:


 


HPIL
HOLDING


By:
/s/ Nitin Amersey


Director
and CFO


 


 


INVESTOR:


 


KODIAK
CAPITAL GROUP, LLC


By:
/s/ Ryan Hodson


Managing
Member