alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020271EN.01001401.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — SCT d.d., in liquidation v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-146/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 90 and 273 - Taxable amount - Reduction - Refusal - Non-payment - Taxable person who did not lodge a claim in insolvency proceedings commenced against the debtor - Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality - Direct effect)

(2020/C 271/19)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SCT d.d., in liquidation

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 90(1) and Article 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which a taxable person is refused the right to a reduction of the value added tax paid in respect of an irrecoverable claim where he has failed to lodge that claim in insolvency proceedings commenced against the debtor, even though the taxable person has shown that, had he lodged the claim, he would not have been able to recover it; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 90(1) and Article 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which a taxable person is refused the right to a reduction of the value added tax paid in respect of an irrecoverable claim where he has failed to lodge that claim in insolvency proceedings commenced against the debtor, even though the taxable person has shown that, had he lodged the claim, he would not have been able to recover it;

| 2. | Article 90(1) of the Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted as meaning that national courts are required, by virtue of their obligation to take all appropriate measures to ensure the implementation of that provision, to interpret national law in conformity with that provision or, if such an interpretation is not possible, to disapply any national legislation the application of which would lead to a result contrary to that provision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 90(1) of the Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted as meaning that national courts are required, by virtue of their obligation to take all appropriate measures to ensure the implementation of that provision, to interpret national law in conformity with that provision or, if such an interpretation is not possible, to disapply any national legislation the application of which would lead to a result contrary to that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.

---
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



                  Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section
1350, I, the undersigned Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of Gehl Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.






Date:  March 6, 2003                          /s/ Kenneth P. Hahn
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Kenneth P. Hahn
                                              Vice President of Finance
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021163EN.01000702.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Agrimotion S.A. v ADAMA Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-912/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Placing of plant protection products on the market - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Article 52(1) - Parallel trade permit - Personal nature of that permit)

(2021/C 163/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agrimotion S.A.

Defendant: ADAMA Deutschland GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 52(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that only the holder of a parallel trade permit may place a plant protection product on the market in the Member State which granted that permit.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: September 13, 2007 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       | 
|------------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                          | Todd E. Wille           | 
|                          | Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

30

---
From: <Susan.Kidd@aps.com>

To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/15/2012 12:14 PM

Subject: SCR Cost information in submittal to EPA

As per your request for cost file backups for our comment filing, see the attached files. Most of the costs are from, 

or based on, the CH2M HILL BART analyses (first three documents, Appendix A, p. 65-67 for Unit 2, p. 66-68 for 

Unit 3, and p. 66-68 for Unit 4). APS SNCR costs are calculated from B&V SNCR Study (fourth document, Appendix 

C, p. 140-144) with adjustments as explained below. 

APS LNB/OFA capital is actual cost escalated to 2012 (see JWE document, fifth document, red tab). APS SNCR 

capital is from the B&V SNCR Study (see JWE document for breakdown used). APS SCR capital is CH2M HILL cost 

escalated to 2012 and adjusted for 3+1 SCR configuration (see JWE document). APS SCR reagent cost is from 

CH2M HILL BART analyses. APS SNCR reagent cost is from B&V SNCR Study for Units 2&3; Unit 4 is ratioed from 

that based on MW’s. The sixth document is my roll up of all these costs into a single document, which was used to 

make the tables we gave to the Agency. NOTE: all SCR and SNCR costs are adjusted to remove LNB/OFA costs from 

estimates that included them as LNB/OFA/SCR or LNB/OFA/SNCR costs.

Call me if you have questions.

Sue Kidd

Director- Environmental

(602) 250-4226

--- NOTICE ---

This message is for the designated recipient only and may 

contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If 

you have received it in error, please notify the sender 

immediately and delete the original and any copy or printout. 

Unintended recipients are prohibited from making any other use 

of this e-mail. Although we have taken reasonable precautions 

to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no 

liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments, or for any delay or errors or omissions in

the contents which result from e-mail transmission.
Scrapie Positive, Exposed, 

High-Risk and/or Suspect

Non-positive, Non-Exposed, 

Non High-risk, Non-suspect

Movement Restricted

VS or State Veterinarian 

will provide instructions 

on movement

***Not in Slaughter 

Channels 

Ewes, Rams, Does & 

Bucks of any age 

(ICVI required to cross a state line 

unless moving with an owner/hauler 

statement to a Federally Approved 

Market or another premises of the 

flock without change of ownership)

**In Slaughter Channels

To a: Terminal Feedlot, 

Slaughter, Slaughter-only 

Auctions, Personal 

consumption

Wethers

18 months 

or older

Less than 18 

months old

SHEEP & GOAT Official Identification Decision Tree

Easiest = if it is leaving your farm, put in an official eartag (for some exceptions see below) 

Sheep & Goats

18 months 

or older

*Official ID 

required

No official ID 

required

*Official ID 

required

4/10/19

Less than 18 

months old

* Group/lot ID and owner/hauler statement may be used for some movements in place of individual ID 

***Registry or Flock ID tattoos or implanted microchips may be used with additional requirements

For more information, visit http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal-health/scrapie

**Moving sheep & goats in 

slaughter channels

Complete an owner/hauler statement 

with group/lot ID to travel with the 

animals

Tattoos and implanted microchips 

may not be used for animals in 

slaughter channels or moving through 

a livestock sale. When individual ID is 

required apply an official ear tag.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc.
(the Company) for the nine months ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron
OConnor, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron OConnor                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Ron OConnor
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
December 29, 2003

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. This certification is not being filed as part of this Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

2
18927

#### State v. Quinn

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACCOMPANYING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,282
<PP&E>                                          25,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,368
<SALES>                                         79,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,089
<CGS>                                           92,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,299)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (67,398)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (68,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (68,271)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.00)
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1038 

To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided by reason of 

a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Mr. RISCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided 

by reason of a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Star Program 

5 Integrity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO WARRANTY. 

7 Section 324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 6294a) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1038 IS

1 ‘‘(e) NO WARRANTY.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any disclosure relating to 

3 participation of a product in the Energy Star pro4 gram shall not create an express or implied warranty 

5 or give rise to any private claims or rights of action 

6 under Federal or State law relating to the disquali7 fication of that product from Energy Star if— 

8 ‘‘(A) the product has been certified by a 

9 certification body recognized by the Energy 

10 Star program; 

11 ‘‘(B) the Administrator has approved cor12 rective measures, including a determination of 

13 whether consumer compensation is appropriate; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(C) the responsible party has fully com16 plied with all approved corrective measures. 

17 ‘‘(2) NO ACTION BY ADMINISTRATOR NEC18 ESSARY.—Nothing in this subsection requires the 

19 Administrator to modify any procedure or take any 

20 other action.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019072EN.01003701.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/37

---

Action brought on 21 December 2018 — Glimarpol v EUIPO — Metar (Pneumatic power tools)

(Case T-748/18)

(2019/C 72/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Glimarpol sp. z o.o. (Bytom, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Metar sp. z o.o. (Gliwice, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: European Union design 2 125 435-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2018 in Case R 1615/2017-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and refer the case back to EUIPO for reconsideration; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and refer the case back to EUIPO for reconsideration;

| — | alter the contested decision by stating that there are no grounds for declaring Registered Community design No 002125435-001 as invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision by stating that there are no grounds for declaring Registered Community design No 002125435-001 as invalid;

| — | award the costs in the applicant’s favour. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs in the applicant’s favour.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
# C_2020077EN.01003801.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY

(Case C-139/19) (1)

(2020/C 77/53)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MIAMI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 20288.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 19, 1963.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N. L. R. B., for petitioner.

O. R. T. Bowden, Hamilton & Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the record in this case, including the grave doubts east upon the credibility of one of the principal witnesses for the General Counsel. We conclude that there is substantial evidence upon the record as a whole, in light of the corroborating testimony, to support the findings and conclusions of the Board.

The Board’s Order will be enforced.
#### Johns v. Bostwick

15033, 15177

2/19/92

Denied
Company Plant Kiln Avg (ppmd@7%O2) Capitol Cement* San Antonio, TX PH/PC 0.34
Alamo Cement San Antonio, TX PH or PC 0.46 Holcim Portland, CO PH/PC 1.10 Holcim Ada, OK Wet 1.42 Capitol Cement San Antonio, TX Wet 1.49
Holcim* Ste Genevieve,MO PH/PC 1.55 Lehigh Tehachapi, CA PH/PC 2.56
Holcim Devils Slide, UT PH/PC 5.15
National Cement Ragland, A L PH/PC 7.61 Holcim Catskill, NY Wet 9.11 Lafarge Harleyville, SC PH/PC 14.30 Lehigh Redding, CA PH 14.87

Lone Star Pryor, OK Dry, kiln3 15.07 Lehigh Leeds, AL PH 15.12

Lone Star* Pryor, OK Dry, kiln 1&2 17.03
Ash Grove* Louisville, NE PH or PC 24.70 Lafarge Ravena,NY Wet, K1 26.23 Lafarge Alpena, MI Dry, K23 30.78 CalPortland Mojave, CA PH/PC, K1 55.37 Avg of top 3 0.63
#### Cabacungan v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.

16713

11/30/94

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5333]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                    July 31, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Steve Womack to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Jordan American Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-80690 and 33-82552) on Form S-8 and the registration statement on
Form S-3 that is Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the registration statement
(No. 33-31234) on Form S-1 of Jordan American Holdings, Inc. of our report
dated February 9, 1998, except for Note 10 as to which the date is March 20,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Jordan American
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the years then ended, which report appears in Jordan American
Holdings, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
1997.



                                 /s/ Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.
                                 ARTHUR F. BELL, JR. & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
                                 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



March 26, 1998
Lutherville, Maryland