alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020390EN.01001501.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 — BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

(Case C-669/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Access to documents - Protection of personal data - Allegedly irregular disclosure of such data - Regulations (EC) No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 - Admissibility of pleas and offers of evidence before the General Court of the European Union - Allocation of costs)

(2020/C 390/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: BP (represented by: E. Lazar, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders BP to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BP to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.

---
#### In the Matter of Beatrice Mulligan, Appellant, v Michael Mulligan, Respondent.

Mercure, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Traficanti Jr., J.), entered March 28, 1990, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, to find respondent in violation of a prior order of visitation.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding claiming that respondent and his wife, Patricia Rivera, interfered with petitioner’s phone calls to her three children and that respondent and Rivera used drugs and alcohol and mentally and physically abused the children. Both parties appeared *pro se.*Following a hearing, Family Court dismissed the petition with prejudice and ordered petitioner not to file any further petitions unless represented by counsel at the time of filing or Family Court would review any petitions filed before any process would be issued. Petitioner appeals.

Initially, Family Court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s application to exclude the children and Rivera during the proceeding *(see,*22 NYCRR 205.4). We also reject petitioner’s claim that Family Court erred in dismissing the petition. Given that the matter "turns almost entirely on *336assessments of the credibility of the witnesses * * * the findings of the nisi prius court must be accorded the greatest respect” *(Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776, 777). Our own examination of the record establishes that Family Court’s determination that respondent and Rivera were not shown to have interfered with visitation and phone calls conforms to the weight of the evidence.

Finally, we find merit in petitioner’s claim that Family Court improperly prohibited her from filing future *pro se*petitions unless such petitions are reviewed by the court before service of process. Although Family Court has authority to limit a petitioner’s right to proceed *pro se*in extreme cases *(see, Muka v New York State Bar Assn.,*120 Misc 2d 897, 903; *Matter of Rappaport,*109 Misc 2d 640, 642; *see also, People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10, 15), any restriction upon such right must be carefully scrutinized *(see, Walker & Bailey v We Try Harder,*123 AD2d 256, 257; *see also, Bounds v Smith,*430 US 817, 821-822; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac If 321.07). On this record, which does not set forth the number of actions or proceedings petitioner has brought, the reasons therefor or the merit thereto, we cannot sustain Family Court’s determination prohibiting future *pro se*petitions. Petitioner’s conduct has not been shown to be so egregious as to deprive her of the right to proceed *pro se*in the future *(cf, e.g., People v McIntyre, supra,*at 18; *Muka v New York State Bar Assn., supra,*at 903; *Matter of Rappaport, supra,*at 642).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as limited petitioner’s right to file future *pro se*petitions, and, as so modified, affirmed.
[Cite as State v. Harris, 2018-Ohio-1012.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-09-140 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 03/19/2018 

 : 

KEITH DOUGLAS HARRIS, JR., : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2017-04-0664 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Lina N. Alkamhawi, Government 

Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011, for plaintiff-appellee 

Mary K. Martin, P.O. Box 300, Orient, OH 43146, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript 

of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Keith Douglas Harris, Jr., has filed a brief 

with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which 

(1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose 
Butler CA2017-09-140 

any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment 

of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the 

appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record 

independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and 

without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw 

as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies 

that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
PROMISSORY NOTE


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Entranet, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Maker”), promises to pay to the order of Eleftherios
Papgeorgiou, an individual (the “Holder”), the principal amount of eighteen thousand ($18,000) for the payments made by Holder
on the Maker’s behalf as set forth on Exhibit A hereto, together with interest accrued on or before December 31, 2014. Maker
may at any time prior to conversion, redemption or repayment in full of this Note repay all or any part of said loans under this
Note.


1. Interest. The outstanding principal balance of this Interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal balance of this
Note at a fixed rate of four percent (4%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 365-day year.


2. Interest Method Of Payment; Application. Payments (including all prepayments) received by Holder on this Note shall
be applied first to the payment of accrued and unpaid interest and only thereafter to the outstanding principal balance of this
Amended and Restated Promissory Note.


3. Prepayment. Maker may prepay the principal and accrued interest due at any time without penalty.


4. Notices. All notices or other communications required or provided to be sent by either party shall be in writing and
shall be sent by: (i) by United States Postal Service, certified mail, return receipt requested, (ii) by any nationally known
overnight delivery service for next day delivery, (iii) delivered in person or (iv) sent by telecopier or facsimile machine which
automatically generates a transmission report that states the date and time of the transmission, the length of the document transmitted
and the telephone number of the recipient’s telecopier or facsimile machine (with a copy thereof sent in accordance with clause
(i), (ii) or (iii) above). All notices shall be deemed to have been given upon receipt. All notices shall be addressed to the
parties at the addresses below:


To the Maker: 101 Plaza Real South, St. 202N, Boca Raton, 33432 FL USA


To the Holder: 44 Plateon Street, 54249 Thessaloniki Greece


6. Governing law. This Note shall be governed by, and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of
the State of Florida, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof.


7. Entire agreement. This Note constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof and may not be modified, amended, or changed except in writing.


8. Benefits; binding effect. This Note shall be for the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the Maker and the Holder
and their respective successors and assigns.


9. Headings. The headings contained in this Note are for reference purposes
only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of any or all of the provisions hereof.





EXHIBIT A


	                       	Date	 	 	Amount	Recipient	 
	 	 	April	16,	2014	$12,000	Todd	Feinstein
	 	 	June	18,	2014	$ 6,000	Todd	Feinstein
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 26, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), AI Infrastructure Alliance, Inc. (“AIIA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO; Çukurova University, Industrial Engineering Department, Adana, TURKEY; SEMATIC, San Francisco, CA; and deepset GmbH, Berlin, GERMANY, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AIIA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On January 5, 2022, AIIA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13759).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 3, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2023 (88 FR 66058).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27609 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00157-CR

Damien Gene Flores

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-CR-8046-DC

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 14, 2021
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0262

_____________________________

DECEMBER LEIGH WEBB,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County.

Melissa G. Olin, Judge.

May 10, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and LEWIS and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross S. Haine II, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 568 

Honoring the Portland Timbers as the champions of Major League Soccer 

in 2015. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2015 

Ms. BONAMICI (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. DEFAZIO, 

and Mr. WALDEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the Portland Timbers as the champions of Major 

League Soccer in 2015. 

Whereas, on December 6, 2015, the Portland Timbers won 

the Major League Soccer Cup, the championship match 

of Major League Soccer; 

Whereas by defeating the Columbus Crew by a score of 2 to 

1, the Portland Timbers won their first Major League 

Soccer championship and the 20th edition of the Major 

League Soccer Cup; 

Whereas Portland Timbers players Diego Valeri and Rodney 

Wallace scored goals in the Major League Soccer Cup; 

Whereas the goal by Diego Valeri in the first minute of the 

match was the earliest in Cup history; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 568 IH 

Whereas Portland Timbers midfielder Diego Valeri was designated by Major League Soccer as the Most Valuable 

Player of the Major League Soccer Cup; 

Whereas the victory of the Portland Timbers in the Major 

League Soccer Cup was the first Major League Soccer 

championship win for Portland Timbers head coach, 

Caleb Porter, and Portland Timbers owner, Merritt 

Paulson; 

Whereas the victory of the Portland Timbers in the Major 

League Soccer Cup was the first such championship for 

any team in the Pacific Northwest; 

Whereas by giving back to the community through charity 

work, the Portland Timbers organization inspires the 

people of Soccer City, USA, also known as Portland, Oregon, both on and off the pitch; 

Whereas the supporters group of the Portland Timbers, the 

Timbers Army exemplifies pride in the Rose City, where 

there is no pity; 

Whereas the Timbers Army, through contributions to their 

community, club, and country, are the greatest of all supporters in Major League Soccer; and 

Whereas the success of the Portland Timbers soccer team will 

broaden an appreciation of athletics in young people and 

encourage Oregonians to volunteer in their communities: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the Portland Timbers as the cham3 pions of Major League Soccer in 2015; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 568 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the outstanding achievement of 

2 the Portland Timbers team, ownership, and staff; 

3 and 

4 (3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House 

5 to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the 

6 Portland Timbers. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         154,086
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  208,883
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,969
<PP&E>                                         3,080,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,833,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,609,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,924
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,602,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,609,396
<SALES>                                        586,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               588,745
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,941<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                319,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            319,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   319,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARIEN GRADY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 374 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of January, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF CAYENNE SOFTWARE, INC.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORMS 10-K, 10KA AND 10-Q.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                       490
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,760
<PP&E>                                          18,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        170
<COMMON>                                           213
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,137
<SALES>                                          4,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,959
<CGS>                                              368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     87
<INCOME-TAX>                                        63
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 24
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        24
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>