alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 20

- 00373

- CV

___________________________

Origi nal P roceeding 43rd District Court of Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. 14266

Before Birdwell, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr
, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### P AT 

### L EATHERMAN 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has not resp onded to this court ’ s February 5, 202 1 letter requesting th at

relator ’ s counsel either file a mo tion to dismiss this original proceeding or inform the

court whether relator wishes to continue the original p roceeding

. Because we have
received no response to our letter, and because the trial court has commenced acti on

on rela tor ’ s motion for DN A testing
, we deny relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus

.

Per Curiam

Delivered : February 25, 2021
AMENDMENT TO THE GEHL
COMPANY  RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN
B December 15, 2006

Section 2.01(p) of Plan B is amended
by the addition of the following at the end thereof:

| | Effective
January 1, 2007, the Executive Officers of the Company as of such date (i.e., William D.
Gehl, Malcolm F. Moore, Thomas M. Rettler, Michael J. Mulcahy, Kenneth H. Feucht, Daniel
M. Keyes, Daniel L. Miller and James J. Monnat) shall cease to be eligible to be
Employees and shall be treated for all purposes under the Plan pursuant to the
rules of Section 3.06(c) for a Participant who transfers to a non-Employee status.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*     *     *
American Association of Blacks in Energy-Denver Area Chapter

Testimony for EPA Hearing on Climate Change July 30, 2014 Denver, CoFannie Posey Eddy, President, American Association of Blacks in EnergyDenver Area Chapter (AABE-DAC). The American Association of Blacks in Energy (AABE) is a national organization of energy professionals comprised of a network of 37 chapters with over 1800 members across the United States representing every sector of the energy industry. Our mission is to ensure the input of African Americans and other minorities into the discussions and developments of energy policies, regulations, R&D technologies, and environmental issues. The AABE recognizes the need for increased participation in the discussion on Climate Change policy by historically underserved communities and has developed very specific principles related to Climate Change that includes the support of:

Mechanisms to achieve cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) Reduction policies which do not result in a net negative impact on jobs, trade balances and the cost of goods and services. Consistent GHG emission reduction policies which seek to balance the cost of environmental improvements with the benefits of economic development, cleaner air and water.

Page 1 14405 W. Colfax Ave #264, Lakewood, Co 80401-3206, 303-570-4989, poseyfpe@gmail.com

### - Policies ensuring that low and fixed income consumers do not shoulder a disproportionate cost impact as a result of efforts to reduce GHG emissions. Climate change is a real threat to the health and welfare of our most vulnerable citizens which include the elderly, children, and people living in poverty. Realizing that there is no simple solution for addressing the Climate Change issue, we support the President's Action Plan to reduce carbon pollution and prepare our communities for the effects of climate change. We should also continue to pursue options which include the research, development, commercialization and deployment of energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural gas and other energy technologies that would be effective in reducing GHG emissions. On behalf of the American Association of Blacks in Energy Denver Area Chapter, I would like to thank you for this opportunity and ask that the EPA continue to proactively involve the voice of African Americans and other minorities in this significant discussion. We offer AABE: as a resource and collaborator. Thank you,
Fannie Posey Eddy, President AABE-DAC

Page 2 14405 W. Colfax Ave #264, Lakewood, Co 80401-3206, 303-570-4989, poseyfpe@gmail.com
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4285 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4285

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica Hill, New Jersey, as the ``James C. 
                `Billy' Johnson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES C. ``BILLY'' JOHNSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica Hill, New Jersey, shall be 
known and designated as the ``James C. `Billy' Johnson Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James C. 
`Billy' Johnson Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27562]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Bytecode Alliance Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Bytecode Alliance 
Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Stellar Development Foundation, San Francisco, CA, has 
been added as a party to this venture.
    Also, Suborbital, Ottawa, CANADA, has withdrawn as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Bytecode Alliance Foundation intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On April 20, 2022, Bytecode Alliance Foundation filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29379).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 19, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 5, 2023 (88 FR 69231).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27562 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of NuWay Medical,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended  September  30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby certifies
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to NuWay Medical,  Inc. and will be retained by NuWay Medical, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 Date: March 5, 2004

/s/ Dennis Calvert
--------------------------------
Dennis Calvert, President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Interim Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GEORGE L. BREWSTER, JR., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-859

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Opinion filed November 6, 2019. 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit

Court for Hillsborough County; Katherine

G. Essrig Judge. 

 

Julianne M. Holt of Law Office of

Julianne M. Holt, Tampa, for Petitioner. 

 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. 

LaROSE, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### John G. Poulos, Plaintiff, *v.*City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

August 5, 1959.

*Emanuel Morgenbesser*and *James Rosthal*for Cavanagh’s Enterprises, Inc., defendant.

*Hovell, Clarkson, Klupt & Schrank (Herbert Schrank*and *Douglas H. Krieger*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Charles A. Loreto, J.

Motion by defendants Cavanagh’s Enterprises, Inc., and John J. Cavanagh, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the second cause of action brought against them is granted, with leave to replead.

*500The complaint, as it relates to movants, seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of the alleged negligence of these defendants in permitting the roadway in front of their premises to be dug, resulting in an unguarded trench into which the plaintiff, a pedestrian, fell.

It appears that this accident occurred on the roadway in a public street and that the dangerous condition complained of consisted of a trench which had been dug in the roadway by contractors engaged by the city. The complaint fails to allege that this condition was created by either Cavanagh’s Enterprises, Inc., or John J. Cavanagh, or gives any indication of their interference with the roadway. There is an absence of any statement of ultimate facts from which it might be inferred that they assumed any obligation to maintain the place where the accident took place. Absent any such allegation, no liability can be predicated against them *(Congreve*v. *Smith,*18 N. Y. 79; *Sciremammana*v. *City of New York,*271 App. Div. 842; *McCutcheon*v. *National City Bank,*265 App. Div. 878, affd. 291 N. Y. 509). Nor is there any allegation of any special use by movants of the roadway fronting their premises *(Nickelsbury*v. *City of New York,*263 App. Div. 625; *Langfelder*v. *City of New York,*271 App. Div. 309). Thus, the only connection with the occurrence of the accident to which these defendants can be related is that one was the owner and the other the lessee of one of the buildings fronting the trench and maintained as a restaurant. In this situation, plaintiff assumes in his complaint the duty of movants to safeguard persons leaving the restaurant from injury sustained on the roadway. In the absence of any allegations showing upon which facts such duty rests, the complaint is palpably deficient to predicate liability on the part of these moving defendants *(Massa*v. *City of New York,*201 Misc. 259).

Plaintiff may serve, if he be so advised, an amended complaint within 20 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 15-03

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron E. Rippke

Director

SUBJECT: Adjustment for Clostridium perfringens Type C and Type D Reagents

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this document is to notify veterinary biologics manufacturers that the

use dilutions of two Clostridial antitoxins (Clostridium perfringens Type C and 

Clostridium perfringens Type D) and the L+ of Clostridium perfringens Type D toxin 

have been adjusted for the test procedures codified in title 9, Code of Federal 

Regulations (9 CFR), section 113.112(c) and section 113.111(c).

II. BACKGROUND

The Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) conducts yearly validation testing on 

Clostridial reagents in comparison to the WHO International Standard antitoxins. 

Upon testing, it was determined that adjustments needed to be made to the 

C. perfringens Type C and Type D reagents. 

After confirmatory testing was conducted, the following adjustments have been made:

C. perfringens Type C antitoxin, IRP 585-A: will be used at a 1:50 use dilution. 

C. perfringens Type D antitoxin, IRP 249: will be used at a 1:44 use dilution. 

C. perfringens Type D toxin, IRP 450: the L+ has been changed to 0.9 mL, the 

Lo remains the same at 0.6 mL.

III. POLICY

These reagents can still be obtained from the CVB. The reagent data sheets will be 

updated to reflect the changes. We will continue to monitor these reagents yearly. 

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY

This change is effective upon publication of this notice.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

BYRON 

RIPPKE

Digitally signed by BYRON RIPPKE 

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=Department 

of Agriculture, cn=BYRON RIPPKE, 

0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=12001000004093 

Date: 2015.03.27 14:43:13 -05'00'
# C_2008037EN.01003001.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/30

---

Action brought on 7 December 2007 — Behring & Söhne v Commission

(Case T-445/07)

(2008/C 37/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Behring & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: P. Niggemann and K. Gaßner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 4257 final of 19 September 2007 (COMP/E-1/39.168 — Haberdashery: fasteners); |
| --- | --- |

—

the annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 4257 final of 19 September 2007 (COMP/E-1/39.168 — Haberdashery: fasteners);

| — | in the alternative, the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant in the contested decision to a symbolic penalty or to an amount that is in any event appropriate; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant in the contested decision to a symbolic penalty or to an amount that is in any event appropriate;

| — | that the defendant be ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

that the defendant be ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant challenges Commission Decision C(2007) 4257 final of 19 September 2007 in Case COMP/E-1/39.168 — Haberdashery: fasteners. In the contested decision, a fine was imposed on the applicant and other undertakings for infringement of Article 81 EC. In the Commission's view, the applicant participated in the coordination of price increases, together with the exchange of confidential information as to prices and the implementation of price increases on the markets for ‘other fasteners’ and application machines.

The applicant relies on four pleas in law in support of its claim.

It submits, first, that the contested decision infringes its right to a fair hearing, since it had no opportunity to comment on a series of meetings held in relation to the so-called ‘Basle group’ and the ‘Wuppertal group’, on which the Commission based its allegations relating to the coordination of price increases and the exchange of confidential information as to prices and the implementation of price increases.

Secondly, it claims that the alleged infringements of the law relating to cartels have ceased, since the applicant ended its participation in the ‘Basle group’ and the ‘Wuppertal group’ as early as the beginning of 1997.

The applicant also maintains that there was no infringement of Article 81 EC, since the Commission has failed to adduce the requisite proof of the applicant's participation in any arrangements.

Lastly, the applicant claims that the calculation of the fine is factually incorrect. In that regard, it alleges in particular that the findings of the defendant, both as to the length of the purported infringement by the applicant, and as to the seriousness of the infringement, are incorrect and that the amount of the fine is disproportionate.

---
EX-10.18




 Exhibit 10.18 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO
SURFACE RIGHTS LEASE 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SURFACE RIGHTS LEASE (the “Amendment”), effective
December 31, 2015, is by and between RAMACO CENTRAL APPALACHIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lessor”), and RAMACO RESOURCES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
“Lessee”). 
 Recitals 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee entered into that certain Surface Rights Lease dated August 20, 2015 (the “Surface Rights
Lease”); and 
 WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to modify certain terms of the Surface Rights Lease pursuant to this
Amendment. 
 Agreement 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar cash-in-hand paid, the mutual agreements between the parties, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following: 
 1. Base
Rent. The first paragraph of Section 3.01 of the Surface Rights Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety, and replaced with the following paragraph: 

Lessee shall pay to Lessor a minimum monthly rental (the “Base Rent”), in arrears, calculated as follows. Beginning with calendar
month immediately following the earlier of (i) May 20, 2016, or (ii) the date that Lessee enters into a credit facility, or receives other debt or equity financing, to provide substantial funding for the construction of the Plant,
then, for such month and the succeeding twenty-three (23) consecutive calendar months thereafter, Lessee shall pay the Base Rent of Forty-One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Seven and 00/100 Dollars ($41,667.00) per month; and, for each calendar
month thereafter for so long as this Lease remains in effect, the Base Rent of Eighty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Three and 00/100 Dollars ($83,333.00) per month. Payments of Base Rent shall be paid on or before the twentieth (20th) day
of the next succeeding calendar month following the month for which such Base Rent is accrued. Lessee shall provide written notice to Lessor within three days following the occurrence of the condition in clause (ii) above. 

2. No Other Modifications. All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall continue to remain in full force and effect,
notwithstanding this Amendment. 

  
 Page 1 of 2










 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties acknowledge their agreement to the foregoing Amendment by
causing their duly authorized representatives to sign below: 
  

			
	LESSOR:
	
	 RAMACO CENTRAL APPALACHIA, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	/s/ Randall W. Atkins
	Name:	 	Randall W. Atkins
	Its:	 	Authorized Agent
	
	LESSEE:
	
	 RAMACO RESOURCES, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael D. Bauersachs
	Name:	 	Michael D. Bauersachs
	Its:	 	Authorized Agent



  
 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UnifyCorporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m); and

 

(2)  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: March 12, 2004 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | Todd E. Wille           |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to UnifyCorporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Mooney, Appellant.

(Nos. 32139 and 32140

Decided May 3, 1950.)

*Mr. Thomas E. Blakely,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Oliver R. Marshall,*for appellee.

*Mr. Lester W. Donaldson*and *Mr. Earl O. Pettersson,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.