alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000854858   
<NAME>                                         Ajay Sports, Inc.   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                            64
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    7,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              14,020
<PP&E>                                         1,822
<DEPRECIATION>                               830,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,672
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,962    
<PREFERRED>                                    1,250    
<COMMON>                                         233
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18,627  
<SALES>                                       24,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              24,341
<CGS>                                         20,759 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,067 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (893)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,733)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.09) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.09)
        

</TABLE>
6 . 28 . 2017

Contact CVB Program and Information Management and Security 

(PIMS) at: CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov

Changes are coming 

A new version of the NCAH Portal will be deployed on the evening of Wednesday, June 28. 

The system will be unavailable from approximately 10pm –12am.

There are not many changes in this version, but a few of them may catch you off guard if 

you’re not aware of them. Be sure to look at the list below and check out any associated 

User Guides so you know what to expect on Thursday morning.

Vol. 2 ISSUE 5

NCAH PORTAL news for CVB

NCAH Portal changes made in version 1.2.0

1. The Submission History has been moved out of Account Details. 

2. In the CVB Search section of Submission History, fields have been added for Product Code, Serial Number and Last Action Date.

3. You will now see the Product Code on your daily portal emails.

4. You can now attach multiple documents in the MISC, Letter area of the 2008 module of the portal.

Important Reminder

Items MUST be retrieved from the NCAH Portal and saved within 60 calendar days after 

completion of the Mail Log Item. The NCAH Portal is designed to be a transmission tool, not a 

retention tool. This is a security feature in place to protect your confidential business information. 

Updated User Guides 

1. User Guide #3 - Submission History (CVB) and Account Details (previously titled “How to Use 

Account Details”)

 2. User Guide #5 - General Guide for Submission of Veterinary Biologics Production and Test Report
# C_2021035EN.01001101.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v WS

(Case C-302/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/98/EU - Rights for third country workers who hold single permits - Article 12 - Right to equal treatment - Social security - Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the purposes of determining entitlement to a family benefit, the family members of the holder of a single permit who do not reside in the territory of that Member State)

(2021/C 35/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale

Defendant: WS

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(1)(e) of Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State must be interpreted as precluding the legislation of a Member State under which, for the purpose of determining entitlement to a social security benefit, the family members of the holder of a single permit, within the meaning of Article 2(c) thereof, who do not reside in the territory of that Member State but in a third country are not be taken into account, whereas account is taken of family members of nationals of that Member State residing in a third country.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
# C_2020262EN.01000702.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency

(Case C-310/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - Recruitment procedure - Classification in grade - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants - Article 86 - European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) - General implementing provisions - Challenge of the proposed classification - Withdrawal of the offer of employment - Action for compensation - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Breach of administrative duty - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Non-material damage - Compensation)

(2020/C 262/10)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Boudewijn Schokker (represented by: T. Martin and S. Orlandi, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Aviation Safety Agency (represented by: S. Rostren, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 February 2019, Schokker v EASA (T-817/17, not published, EU:T:2019:74); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 February 2019, Schokker v EASA (T-817/17, not published, EU:T:2019:74);

| 2. | Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay compensation in the sum of EUR 7 500 to Mr Boudewijn Schokker; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay compensation in the sum of EUR 7 500 to Mr Boudewijn Schokker;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay its own costs relating to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-817/17 and the appeal proceedings as well as those incurred by Mr Boudewijn Schokker relating to both those proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay its own costs relating to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-817/17 and the appeal proceedings as well as those incurred by Mr Boudewijn Schokker relating to both those proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.

---
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 3, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 386 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-224600) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 3, 2018
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) UNIT Company ) ) Under ContractNo. W911KB-07-D-0014 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60581

Michael A. Brain, Esq. Taylor B. McMahon, Esq.

Law Offices ofRoyce and Brain Anchorage, AK Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Carl F. Olson, Esq. Kyle B. Davis, Esq. William B. Davis, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: October 4, 2018

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60581, Appeal ofUNIT Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
[No. 38177.

Department One.

December 23, 1965.]

#### Albert L. Pace, *Appellant,*v. Betty M. Pace, Respondent.*

*Cook, Flanagan & Berst*aiid *Robert A. Berst,*for appellant.

*Jordan & Adair,*for respondent.

*

Reported in 409 P.2d 172.

Per Curiam.

— Appellant Albert L. Pace and respondent Betty M. Pace were divorced on August 8, 1960, and, under the provisions of the decree, appellant was directed to pay money for the support of the minor children of the parties. Appellant fell in arrears on these payments, and on June 26, 1964, respondent secured a judgment against him in the amount of $1,497.20 for arrears of support.

Appellant then petitioned for a modification of the divorce decree with respect to the support provisions. On October 20, 1964, that petition was granted by an order which reduced the amount of future support payments and provided that the judgment for past arrears was to be paid off at the rate of $50 per month. No appeal was taken from this order.

*641In December, 1964, respondent obtained a writ of garnishment based upon the unsatisfied judgment of June 26. The appellant filed a motion to dismiss the writ, which was denied by order entered by the trial court. The appellant appeals.

Appellant concedes that under our law, past-due installments for support money under a divorce decree constitute fixed obligations which may not be modified retroactively by court order and the inherent right to enforce them by usual means may not be denied. *Sanges v. Sanges,*44 Wn.2d 35, 265 P.2d 278 (1953); *Starkey v. Starkey,*40 Wn.2d 307, 242 P.2d 1048 (1952). Appellant contends, however, that this rule of law does not apply in the present case. He argues that the order modifying the decree provided a specific method for payment of the judgment of June 26, that no appeal was taken therefrom, and that respondent is therefore bound by the order of October 20,1964, to accept $50 per month as her sole means of collecting the judgment of June 26.

Appellant misconstrues the effect of the order of October 20, 1964. That order could not and did not purport to provide the *exclusive*method by which respondent could collect her judgment. The effect of the order was rather to provide a means whereby the appellant could pay the judgment for accumulated support payments on an installment basis without being subject to contempt proceedings. See, *e.g., Corson v. Corson,*46 Wn.2d 611, 283 P.2d 673 (1955). The failure to appeal from the order of October 20 did not deprive respondent of the usual means of enforcing her judgment.

Appellant urges this court to establish an exception to the general rule where application of the rule would “defeat a reasonable solution to a support problem.” Such an exception would deny the respondent her statutory provisional remedies in the enforcement of her judgment. We will not interfere with the exercise of these statutory rights. *Starkey v. Starkey, supra.*

The judgment is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Partnership's  Annual Report
on Form  10-K for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:    March 24, 2003               /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                      Title: President and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 99 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 99

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 10, 2015.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Alan Nunnelee, a Representative from the State of Mississippi.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP,
                  INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
EMRISE Corporation (Nos. 333-74281, 333-71035, 333-69571, 333-12567 and
333-65528) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 30, 2007 related to our audits
of the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule,
which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EMRISE Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP

Irvine, California
March 30, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 241 (Monday, December 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 2, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309; Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db9aababb7b2b8baafb2b4b5a8f598b4b6b6beb5afa89bbaafb7f5bda9b9f5b4a9bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="622312120e0b0103160b0d0c114c210d0f0f070c16112203160e4c0410004c0d1005">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Stilwell Activist Investments, L.P., Stilwell Activist Fund, 
L.P., and Stilwell Value Partners VII, L.P., together known as The 
Stilwell Group; Stilwell Value LLC, the general partner of each of the 
limited partnerships, all of New York, New York; and Joseph D. 
Stilwell, San Juan, Puerto Rico, as managing member of Stilwell Value 
LLC; as a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of Peoples 
Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
The Peoples Bank, Biloxi, Mississippi, both of Biloxi, Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-27666 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report), I, James E. Dixon, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.James E. Dixon, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
February 9, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors
Rockingham Heritage Bank
Harrisonburg, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999 of
Rockingham Heritage Bank and Subsidiary. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Bank's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
Rockingham Heritage Bank and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1999, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

                                                     /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                                     ---------------------------
Harrisonburg, Virginia
January 19, 2000, except for Note 17
As to which the date is February 8,2000
PD-0789-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/29/2014 3:07:56 PM

Accepted 12/29/2014 3:55:37 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
From: "Pettis, Mike" <mike.pettis@owenscorning.com>

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Gould, Ken" <ken.gould@owenscorning.com>

Date: 01/18/2012 09:35 AM

Subject:Resend of OC Public version of the 114 request response

Susan, In this resend of the information provided on Dec 21st, I have attached each file separately. If 

you have an issue opening these please let me know.

Mike Pettis
##### 



CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 11 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS   Three Months Ended
    
    Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    September 30,2004
    
    2003
    
    2004
    
    2003Basic Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    746,828
    
    
    $
    338,685
    
    
    $
    1,874,769
    
    
    $
    1,508,131Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,644,656
    
    
    
    2,640,160
    
    
    
    2,644,453
    
    
    
    2,636,541Basic Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.28
    
    
    $
    0.13
    
    
    $
    0.71
    
    
    $
    0.57Diluted Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    746,828
    
    
    $
    338,685
    
    
    $
    1,874,769
    
    
    $
    1,508,131Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,644,656
    
    
    
    2,640,160
    
    
    
    2,644,453
    
    
    
    2,636,541Weighted average effect of
assumed stock options
    
    
    6,701
    
    
    
    2,218
    
    
    
    4,474
    
    
    
    3,478Total
    
    
    2,651,357
    
    
    
    2,642,378
    
    
    
    2,648,927
    
    
    
    2,640,019Diluted Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.28
    
    
    $
    0.13
    
    
    $
    0.71
    
    
    $
    0.57
   18.