alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0               3,353,844
<SECURITIES>                                         0               4,289,193
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               5,212,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0               (166,656)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              13,555,414
<PP&E>                                               0              12,200,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0             (5,508,859)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              30,013,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               3,877,423
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                 725,008
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              24,822,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              30,013,180
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,971,573              17,098,622
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,447,286              10,690,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,967,920               5,883,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,615                  12,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                714,330                 854,401
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,000                  31,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            683,330                 823,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   683,330                 823,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09                    0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09                    0.10
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010234EN.01000601.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma

(Case C-393/08) (1)

1

(National legislation governing opening times and closing days of pharmacies - Exemption - Power of decision of the competent authorities)

2010/C 234/08

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Emanuela Sbarigia

Applicant:

Defendants: Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a Preliminary Ruling — Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio– Interpretation of Arts 49, 81 to 86, 152 and 153 EC — National legislation governing the opening hours and rota arrangements for pharmacies — Pharmacists forbidden to decline annual holiday closure or to remain open beyond the maximum limits set for opening hours

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio, made by decision of 21 May 2008, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1049 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1049

      To allow the financing by United States persons of sales of 
                   agricultural commodities to Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2015

   Ms. Heitkamp (for herself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Udall, and Mr. Flake) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To allow the financing by United States persons of sales of 
                   agricultural commodities to Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Export Expansion Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. FINANCING OF SALES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES TO CUBA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law (other 
than section 908 of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement 
Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207), as amended by subsection (c)), a person 
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States may provide payment or 
financing terms for sales of agricultural commodities to Cuba or an 
individual or entity in Cuba.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Agricultural commodity.--The term ``agricultural 
        commodity'' has the meaning given the term in section 102 of 
        the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602).
            (2) Financing.--The term ``financing'' includes any loan or 
        extension of credit.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 908 of the Trade Sanctions 
Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``and financing'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b);
            (3) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Prohibition'' and all that 
                follows through ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding'' 
                and inserting ``In General.--Notwithstanding''; and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                subsections (b) and (c), respectively, and by moving 
                those subsections, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the 
                left; and
            (4) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``subsection (a)''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.02**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Dennis E. Bunday, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K of Williams Controls Inc.; 

     2. Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

     b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors: 

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

61

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7573

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN ROBINSON, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Face,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, 

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00014-SGW-RSB-5; 5:12-cv-80457-SGWRSB)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Stephen Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Calvert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
amended Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
amended Annual Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    DENNIS
CALVERT
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Dennis Calvert President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

I, Charles K. Dargan II, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amended Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such amended Annual Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    CHARLES K. DARGAN
II
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | Charles K. Dargan II Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 649 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 97
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 649

                          [Report No. 114-458]

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 639) authorizing 
   the Speaker to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the House of 
  Representatives in the matter of United States, et al. v. Texas, et 
                            al., No. 15-674.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 639) authorizing 
   the Speaker to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the House of 
  Representatives in the matter of United States, et al. v. Texas, et 
                            al., No. 15-674.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the resolution (H. Res. 639) authorizing the Speaker to appear as 
amicus curiae on behalf of the House of Representatives in the matter 
of United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15-674. The resolution 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the resolution to its adoption without intervening motion 
or demand for division of the question except: (1) one hour of debate 
equally divided and controlled by chair and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Rules; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 97

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 649

                          [Report No. 114-458]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 639) authorizing 
   the Speaker to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the House of 
  Representatives in the matter of United States, et al. v. Texas, et 
                            al., No. 15-674.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 2016

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS23-20]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of special closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this date.

*Location:*                         Virtual meeting via Webex.                    

*Date:*                         December 6, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. ET.                    

## Action and Discussion Item

Personnel Matter

The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel matter. No action was taken by the ASC.

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-27152 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
February 10, 1999

21525

#### State v. Chin

Affirmed
# The Attorney General ofTexas
October 18, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General Honorable Henry Wade Criminal District Attorney Sixth Floor, Records Building Dallas, Texas 75202 Opinion No. H- 1259 Re: Whether a county treasurer is authorized to receive fees earned by his services to levee improvement districts. Dear Mr. Wade: You ask whether the County Treasurer of Dallas County is entitled to receive the fees prescribed by section 57.066 of the Texas Water Code. Section 57.066 provides that “[tlhe treasurer is entitled to receive as compensation
. .. not more than one-fourth of one percent of all money received by him
. . .I’ in performing his duties for a levee improvement district created pursuant to section 57.011,et. seq., of the Water Code. Article XVI, section 61of the Texas Constitution states that I’
.. . all county officers incounties having a population of twenty thousand (20,000) or more, . . . shall be compensated on a salary basis.” The purpose of this section was to “abolish the fee system of compensating named officers and placing them on a salary basis.” Banks v. State, 362S.W.2d 154,155(Tex. Civ. App. - Austin 1962,writ ref’d); see V.T.C.S. art. 3912k,S5. Webelieve that it isclear that the compensation provided for in section 57.066 of the Water Code constitutes afee rather than a salary. See Greer v. Hunt County,. 249 S.W. 831(Tex. 1923)(salary is a fixed amount, while-F a contingent amount). Similar arrangements have been held unconstitutional. Wichita County v. Robinson, 276 S.W.2d 509 (Tex. 1954); Attorney General Opinions H-202 (1974);S-70 0953); V-743 (1948). SUMMARY The County Treasurer of Dallas County is prohibited by article XVI, section 61of the Texas Constitution from receiving the fees provided for in section 57.066 of the Water Code.

P. 4990Honorable Henry Wade

-’ Page,2 (H-1259)

APPROVED: Attorney General of Texas

Opinion Committee jsn

P. 4991