```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68795-68799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27126]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234; FRL-9919-21-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS39

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- 
and Oil-Fired Electric Steam Generating Units

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct 
final action to amend the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Steam Generating Units 
(Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)). This direct final rule 
amends the reporting requirements in the MATS rule by temporarily 
requiring affected sources to submit all required emissions and 
compliance reports to the EPA through the Emissions Collection and 
Monitoring Plan System (ECMPS) Client Tool and temporarily suspending 
the requirement for affected sources to submit certain reports using 
the Electronic Reporting Tool and the Compliance and Emissions Data 
Reporting Interface (CEDRI).

DATES: This rule is effective on January 5, 2015 without further 
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by December 19, 2014. 
If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that some or 
all of the amendments in the final rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID 
Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234, by one of the following methods:
    http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. Attention Docket ID Number 
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234.
     Fax: (202) 566-9744. Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2009-0234.
     Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send comments to: U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, Mail Code: 28221T, 
Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 
NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 
Docket Center, Room 3334, EPA WJC West Building, 1301 Constitution Ave. 
NW., Washington, DC 20004. Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-
0234. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal 
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for 
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions. Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0234. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be 
included in the public docket without change and may be made available 
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed 
to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information 
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site 
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know 
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body 
of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA 
without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address 
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that 
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If 
you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include 
your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and 
with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment 
due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, 
the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files 
should not include special characters or any form of encryption and be 
free of any defects or viruses. For additional information

[[Page 68796]]

about the EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at: 
http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    We request that you also send a separate copy of each comment to 
the contact person listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barrett Parker, Sector Policies 
and Programs Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and 
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-5635; fax number: (919) 
541-3207; and email address: parker.barrett@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Organization of This Document. The information in this preamble is 
organized as follows:

I. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
II. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
III. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
IV. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With 
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations
    K. Congressional Review Act

I. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?

    The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior 
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and 
anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' 
section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document 
that will serve as the proposed rule to the National Emission Standards 
for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Steam 
Generating Units, if adverse comments are received on this direct final 
rule. If the EPA receives adverse comment on all or a distinct portion 
of this direct final rule, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register informing the public that some or all of this direct 
final rule will not take effect. Any rule provisions that are not 
withdrawn will become effective on January 5, 2015 notwithstanding 
adverse comment on any other provision, unless we determine that it 
would not be appropriate to promulgate those provisions because they 
are affected by another provision (or provisions) for which we receive 
adverse comments. If we receive adverse comments on this direct final 
rule, resulting in withdrawal of the entire rule or any part(s) of it, 
we will address those comments when we finalize the proposal we are 
also publishing in this Federal Register. The EPA does not plan to 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further 
information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of 
this document.

II. Does this direct final rule apply to me?

    Categories and entities potentially regulated by this final rule 
include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Examples of regulated
            Category             NAICS Code \1\          entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry.......................          221112  Fossil fuel-fired
                                                  electric steam
                                                  generating units.
Federal government \2\.........          221122  Fossil fuel-fired
                                                  electric steam
                                                  generating units owned
                                                  by the federal
                                                  government.
State/local/tribal government            221122  Fossil fuel-fired
 \2\.                                             electric steam
                                                  generating units owned
                                                  by states, tribes or
                                                  municipalities.
                                         921150  Fossil fuel-fired
                                                  electric utility steam
                                                  generating units in
                                                  Indian country.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
\2\ Federal, state or local government-owned and operated establishments
  are classified according to the activity in which they are engaged.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this 
direct final rule. To determine whether your facility would be 
regulated by this direct final rule, you should examine the 
applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.9981. If you have any questions 
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, 
consult either the air permitting authority for the entity or your EPA 
regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13.

III. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?

    Submitting CBI. Do not submit information containing CBI to the EPA 
through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or 
all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on 
a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk 
or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or 
CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to 
one complete version of the comments that includes information claimed 
as CBI, you must submit a copy of the comments that does not contain 
the information claimed as CBI for inclusion in the public docket. If 
you submit a CD-ROM or disk that does not contain CBI, mark the outside 
of the disk or CD-ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information 
not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and the EPA's 
electronic public docket without prior notice. Information marked as 
CBI will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set 
forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 2. Send or deliver 
information identified as CBI only to the following address: Roberto 
Morales, OAQPS Document Control Officer (C404-02), OAQPS, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 
27711, and Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234.

IV. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?

    This direct final rule amends the reporting requirements in 40 CFR 
63.10031(f) of the MATS regulation. Currently the rule requires 
affected sources to submit certain MATS emissions and compliance 
information electronically, using either the CEDRI or the ECMPS Client 
Tool. The EPA has developed these two systems for the electronic 
submittal of emissions data. Historically, CEDRI has been used by 
sources regulated under 40 CFR parts 60 and 63 to submit performance 
test reports and other air emissions reports. Historically, ECMPS has 
been used to report emissions data under the EPA's

[[Page 68797]]

Acid Rain Program and other programs that are required to continuously 
monitor and report emissions according to 40 CFR part 75. These two 
systems have enhanced the way sources are reporting emissions data to 
the EPA by providing a streamlined and standardized electronic 
approach.
    Subsequent to publication of MATS, stakeholders commented that the 
EPA could improve the reporting efficiency of the rule by requiring all 
data to be reported to one system instead of two. Stakeholders also 
commented that one system could benefit the EPA and the public in the 
review of data submitted by setting one consistent format for all data 
reported through MATS. Further, because the vast majority of sources 
covered under the MATS rule have been using the ECMPS Client Tool since 
2009, the stakeholders have encouraged the EPA to seriously consider 
consolidating the electronic reporting under ECMPS.
    The EPA agrees with the stakeholders that taking an action to 
increase the efficiency of reporting is not only a plausible path 
forward, but also a priority of the agency. As a result, the EPA plans 
to start the process of converting all electronic reporting in the rule 
to be facilitated by the ECMPS Client Tool with the first step of 
conversion being this direct final rulemaking. However, because the EPA 
cannot create a detailed set of reporting instructions and design, 
develop, beta-test and implement the necessary modifications to the 
ECMPS Client Tool prior to April 16, 2015, the compliance deadline for 
the MATS rule, the EPA is implementing a phased approach to completing 
the modifications to the ECMPS Client Tool.
    The first part of the phased approach the EPA plans to take is this 
direct final rulemaking. This direct final rule requires sources to 
temporarily use the ECMPS Client Tool to submit Portable Document 
Format (PDF) versions of the reports that the current MATS rule 
requires to be submitted using CEDRI. The specific reports that must be 
submitted in PDF format include: Quarterly and annual performance stack 
test reports; 30 operating day Hg LEE test reports; Relative Accuracy 
Test Audits (RATA) reports for Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), 
Hydrogen Chloride (HCl), Hydrogen Fluoride (HF), and Mercury (Hg) 
monitors; Relative Calibration Audit (RCA) and Relative Response Audit 
(RRA) reports for Particulate Matter (PM) Continuous Emissions 
Monitoring System (CEMS); 30 operating day rolling average reports for 
PM CEMS, PM Continuous Parameter Monitoring System (CPMS), and approved 
HAP metals CEMS; and Semiannual compliance reports. Reports for the 
performance stack tests, Hg Low Emitting EGU (LEE) tests, RATAs, RRAs, 
and RCAs typically include a description of the source, the test 
date(s), a list of attendees, a test protocol, a summary of results, 
raw field data, and example calculations, and, depending on the 
method(s) used, may also include the results of sample analyses, 
quality-assurance information (e.g., bias and drift checks), instrument 
calibrations, and calibration gas certificates. Additionally, the due 
dates for all report submittals will continue to be the same as in the 
original final MATS rulemaking in the Federal Register at 77 FR 9303, 
February 16, 2012.
    The EPA realizes that submitting electronic PDF reports is not as 
desirable as reporting the data in extensible markup language (XML) 
format, because the information in a PDF report cannot easily be 
extracted and put in a database format. In view of this, the EPA 
intends to promulgate an additional data reporting revision to the MATS 
rule in the second phase of this approach. In the second phase the EPA 
plans to develop another direct final rulemaking that requires affected 
sources to submit the data elements required in the rule in a 
structured XML format using the ECMPS Client Tool, already in use. The 
second phase will complete the process of conversion of the electronic 
reporting of data using the ECMPS Client Tool and the MATS rule will be 
revised to specify all of the required XML data elements for each type 
of report. The EPA will also develop a detailed set of reporting 
instructions for each report and modify ECMPS accordingly, in order to 
be able to receive and process the data submitted.
    In the event the EPA is unable to finalize the rulemaking for the 
second phase of the electronic reporting conversion by April 16, 2017, 
in accordance with the revisions to the reporting requirements 
contained in this rulemaking, the reporting requirements will 
automatically revert to the original requirements set forth in the 
original MATS rulemaking in the Federal Register at 77 FR 9303, 
February 16, 2012. This is to ensure that the data submitted in the 
future is consistent with the database accessibility that is associated 
with information reported in structured XML formats even if the second 
rulemaking cannot be finalized. Accordingly, this rulemaking includes a 
date of April 16, 2017, to complete the second phase of the electronic 
reporting conversion to the ECMPS Client Tool.
    Comments on this direct final rule are to be limited to issues 
directly associated with the electronic reporting changes covered in 40 
CFR 63.10031.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the 
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is 
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden 
because it does not change the information collection requirements. 
However, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously 
approved the information collection requirements contained in the 
existing regulation (40 CFR part 63, subpart UUUUU) under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and 
has assigned OMB control number 2137.06. The OMB control numbers for 
the EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to 
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice 
and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure 
Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations 
and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impact of this final action on small 
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business that is an 
electric utility producing 4 billion kilowatt-hours or less as defined 
by NAICS codes 221122 (fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam 
generating units) and 921150 (fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam 
generating units in Indian country); (2) a small governmental 
jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school 
district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and 
(3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is 
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impacts of this final rule on small

[[Page 68798]]

entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In 
determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any 
significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the 
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify 
and address regulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant 
economic impact of the rule on small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities if the rule 
relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect 
on all of the small entities subject to the rule.
    This rule will not impose any requirements on small entities, and 
no small entities are expected to incur annualized costs as a result of 
the amendments. We have determined that the amendments will not result 
in any ``significant'' adverse economic impact for small entities. This 
amendment does not create any new requirements or burdens, and no costs 
are associated with this amendment.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This rule does not contain a federal mandate that may result in 
expenditures of $100 million or more for state, local and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. 
The costs of the final amendments would not increase costs associated 
with the final rule. Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements 
of sections 202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA).
    This rule is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of 
UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The final 
amendments contain no requirements that apply to such governments and 
impose no obligations upon them.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132. This action does not modify 
existing responsibilities or create new responsibilities among the EPA 
Regional offices, states or local enforcement agencies. Thus, Executive 
Order 13132 does not apply to this action.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The final 
amendments impose no requirements on tribal governments. Thus, 
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
1997) as applying to those regulatory actions that concern health or 
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of 
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This 
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is based 
solely on technology performance.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, 
May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 
directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its 
regulatory activities, unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
applicable law or otherwise impractical. VCS are technical standards 
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures and 
business practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. The 
NTTAA directs the EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations 
when the agency decides not to use available and applicable VCS.
    This action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, the 
EPA did not consider the use of any VCS.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes 
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision 
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and 
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission 
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high 
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, 
policies and activities on minority populations and low-income 
populations in the United States.
    The EPA has determined that this direct final rule will not have 
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not 
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the 
environment. The final amendments are either clarifications or 
compliance alternatives which will neither increase or decrease 
environmental protection.

K. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by 
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing 
the final rule and other required information to the United States 
Senate, the United States House of Representatives and the Comptroller 
General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the 
Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after 
it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This direct final rule will be 
effective on January 5, 2015.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 7, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the 
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

[[Page 68799]]

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart UUUUU--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Steam Generating Units

0
2. Section 63.10031 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the first sentence in each of the following paragraphs: (f) 
introductory text, (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(4);
0
b. Revising paragraph (f)(5); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (f)(6) to read as follows.

Sec.  63.10031  What reports must I submit and when?

* * * * *
    (f) On or after April 16, 2017, within 60 days after the date of 
completing each performance test, you must submit the results of the 
performance tests required by this subpart to EPA's WebFIRE database by 
using the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) 
that is accessed through EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) 
(www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
    (1) On or after April 16, 2017, within 60 days after the date of 
completing each CEMS (SO2, PM, HCl, HF, and Hg) performance 
evaluation test, as defined in Sec.  63.2 and required by this subpart, 
you must submit the relative accuracy test audit (RATA) data (or, for 
PM CEMS, RCA and RRA data) required by this subpart to EPA's WebFIRE 
database by using CEDRI that is accessed through EPA's CDX 
(www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
    (2) On or after April 16, 2017, for a PM CEMS, PM CPMS, or approved 
alternative monitoring using a HAP metals CEMS, within 60 days after 
the reporting periods ending on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, 
and December 31st, you must submit quarterly reports to EPA's WebFIRE 
database by using the CEDRI that is accessed through EPA's CDX 
(www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
* * * * *
    (4) On or after April 16, 2017, submit the compliance reports 
required under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section and the 
notification of compliance status required under Sec.  63.10030(e) to 
EPA's WebFIRE database by using the CEDRI that is accessed through 
EPA's CDX (www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
    (5) All reports required by this subpart not subject to the 
requirements in paragraphs (f) introductory text and (f)(1) through (4) 
of this section must be sent to the Administrator at the appropriate 
address listed in Sec.  63.13. If acceptable to both the Administrator 
and the owner or operator of a source, these reports may be submitted 
on electronic media. The Administrator retains the right to require 
submittal of reports subject to paragraphs (f) introductory text and 
(f)(1) through (4) of this section in paper format.
    (6) Prior to April 16, 2017, all reports subject to electronic 
submittal in paragraphs (f) introductory text, (f)(1), (f)(2), and 
(f)(4) of this section shall be submitted to the EPA in electronic 
portable document format (PDF) using the ECMPS Client Tool. The 
following data elements must be entered into the ECMPS Client Tool at 
the time of submission of the PDF file:
    (i) The facility name, physical address, mailing address (if 
different from the physical address), and county;
    (ii) The ORIS code (or equivalent ID number assigned by EPA's Clean 
Air Markets Division (CAMD)) and the Facility Registry System (FRS) ID;
    (iii) The EGU (or EGUs) to which the report applies. Report the EGU 
IDs as they appear in the CAMD Business System;
    (iv) If any of the EGUs in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section 
share a common stack, indicate which EGUs share the stack. If emissions 
data are monitored and reported at the common stack according to part 
75 of this chapter, report the ID number of the common stack as it is 
represented in the electronic monitoring plan required under Sec.  
75.53 of this chapter;
    (v) If any of the EGUs described in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this 
section are in an averaging plan under Sec.  63.10009, indicate which 
EGUs are in the plan and whether it is a 30- or 90-day averaging plan;
    (vi) The identification of each emission point to which the report 
applies. An ``emission point'' is a point at which source effluent is 
released to the atmosphere, and is either a dedicated stack that serves 
one of the EGUs identified in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section or 
a common stack that serves two or more of those EGUs. To identify an 
emission point, associate it with the EGU or stack ID in the CAMD 
Business system or the electronic monitoring plan (e.g., ``Unit 2 
stack,'' ``common stack CS001,'' or ``multiple stack MS001'');
    (vii) The rule citation (e.g., Sec.  63.10031(f)(1), Sec.  
63.10031(f)(2), etc.) for which the report is showing compliance;
    (viii) The pollutant(s) being addressed in the report;
    (ix) The reporting period being covered by the report (if 
applicable);
    (x) The relevant test method that was performed for a performance 
test (if applicable);
    (xi) The date the performance test was conducted (if applicable); 
and
    (xii) The responsible official's name, title, and phone number.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-27126 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```