7440 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Notices 

comments of the Advisory Council on 

Historic Preservation to the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, under 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act, regarding proposed 

alterations to Pawtucket Dam on the 

Merrimack River in Lowell, MA. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC) has 

terminated consultation under Section 

106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act regarding a proposal by 

the Lowell Hydroelectric Project (Lowell 

Hydro) to modify the Pawtucket Dam on 

the Merrimack River in Lowell, 

Massachusetts. The Advisory Council 

on Historic Preservation (ACHP) will 

issue advisory comments to FERC 

regarding this project on February 22, 

2013. The ACHP will hold a public 

meeting in Lowell on February 5, 2013 

to receive stakeholder and public views 

regarding the effects of the project on 

historic properties. 

DATES: February 5, 2013, from 7:00 p.m. 

to 9:00 p.m. (E.S.T). 

ADDRESSES: Special Events Center, 

Lowell National Historical Park, Boott 

Mills, Second Floor, 115 John Street, 

Lowell, MA 01852. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

T. Eddins, Program Analyst/ 

Archaeologist, Office of Federal Agency 

Programs, Advisory Council on Historic 

Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Suite 803, Washington, 

DC 20004; Telephone: 202–606–8553; or 

Email: pdcomments@achp.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FERC is in 

the final stages of review of a proposal 

by the Lowell Hydroelectric Project to 

modify the Pawtucket Dam on the 

Merrimack River in the city of Lowell, 

Middlesex County, Massachusetts. In 

2010, Boott Hydropower, Inc. and the 

Eldred L. Field Hydroelectric Facility 

Trust (Boott), co-licensees for the Lowell 

Hydro Project, filed a non-capacity 

amendment for its license with FERC, 

proposing modifications to the dam that 

would address concerns expressed by 

local residents about flooding associated 

with Pawtucket dam operations and also 

more efficiently maintain an operating 

pool for the hydroelectric facility. 

As part of that review process, FERC 

must comply with Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act and 

its implementing regulations (Section 

106), ‘‘Protection of Historic Properties’’ 

at 36 CFR part 800, which require that 

federal agencies take into account the 

effects of undertakings they carry out, 

financially assist, or license on historic 

properties. When, as is the case here, an 

undertaking may adversely affect a 

historic property but certain parties 

cannot reach an agreement to resolve 

such effects, the ACHP issues formal 

comments to the head of the relevant 

agency. The public meeting that is the 

subject of this notice will provide an 

opportunity for FERC, all consulting 

parties, and the public to provide their 

views to the ACHP on this undertaking. 

The ACHP will consider such views as 

it develops and finalizes its formal 

comments. 

The Pawtucket Dam is a nationally 

significant historic engineering resource 

listed in the National Register of 

Historic Places (National Register) and 

as a National Historic Landmark (NHL) 

within the Lowell Locks and Canals 

Historic District (LLCHD). The LLCHD 

is nationally significant as 

representative of America’s first great 

industrial city and today encompasses 

the most historically significant extant 

aggregation of early 19th-century 

industrial structures and artifacts in the 

United States. The Pawtucket Dam is 

also included as a nationally significant 

structure in the Lowell Historic 

Preservation District (LHPD) and the 

National Park Service’s List of Classified 

Structures (LCS) for Lowell National 

Historic Park (LNHP), both listed on the 

National Register. Stakeholders and 

members of the public have expressed 

concerns about the effects of the project 

on Pawtucket Dam itself, the LLCHD, 

LHPD, and LNHP. 

On January 8, 2013, FERC determined 

that agreement on how to resolve 

adverse effects to these historic 

properties could not be reached among 

consulting parties, and requested that 

the ACHP provide comments in order to 

conclude the Section 106 review 

process. A panel of ACHP members will 

issue comments to the head of the 

agency within 45 days of the request 

(i.e., on or before February 22, 2013). 

Once the head of FERC considers the 

ACHP comments and responds to them 

in accordance with the Section 106 

regulations and Section 110(l) of the 

National Historic Preservation Act, 

FERC will have concluded the Section 

106 process and may make a final 

decision on the project. The head of 

FERC must provide a summary of the 

decision that contains a rationale for the 

decision and evidence of consideration 

of the ACHP’s comments, providing a 

copy of the summary to the ACHP and 

all consulting parties, and notifying the 

public. 

Priority for speaking at the public 

meeting will be given to FERC, the 

Massachusetts State Historic 

Preservation Officer, the National Park 

Service, and Boott, and then to those 

who notify the ACHP of their desire to 

speak in advance of the meeting via 

email to pdcomments@achp.gov or fax 

to 202–606–5072. Those interested in 

speaking should provide the name and 

the organization the speaker officially 

represents (if any). Speakers may be 

given prescribed time limits. Requests to 

speak will also be taken at the meeting. 

People who have not preregistered will 

be allowed to speak as time permits. 

The ACHP also welcomes written 

comments from any party. Written 

comments may be sent via mail 

(addressed to the attention of John T. 

Eddins, Program Analyst/Archaeologist, 

Office of Federal Agency Programs, 

Advisory Council on Historic 

Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Suite 803, Washington, 

DC 20004), fax (at 202–606–8672), or via 

email (addressed to 

pdcomments@achp.gov). All written 

comments received by the ACHP on or 

before 5 p.m. February 15, 2013, will be 

part of the public record and reviewed 

by the ACHP prior to the transmittal of 

its formal comments. 

Authority: 36 CFR 800.7. 

Dated: January 29, 2013. 

Reid Nelson, 

Acting Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02210 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–K6–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

[Docket No. DHS–2013–0001] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for Review; 

Information Collection Extension 

Request for the Support AntiTerrorism by Fostering Effective 

Technologies (SAFETY) Act Program 

AGENCY: Science and Technology 

Directorate, DHS. 

ACTION: 30-day Notice and request for 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland 

Security (DHS) is soliciting public 

comment on the following forms: (1) 

Registration as a Seller of an AntiTerrorism Technology (DHS Form 

10010); (2) Request for a PreApplication Consultation (DHS Form 

10009); (3) Notice of License of 

Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology 

(DHS Form 10003); (4) Notice of 

Modification of Qualified AntiTerrorism Technology (DHS Form 

10002); (5) Application for Transfer of 

SAFETY Act Designation and 

Certification (DHS Form 10001); (6) 

Application for Renewal Of SAFETY 

Act Protections of a Qualified AntiTerrorism Technology (DHS Form 

10057); (7) Application for SAFETY Act 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Notices 7441 

Developmental Testing and Evaluation 

Designation (DHS Form 10006); (8) 

Application for SAFETY Act 

Designation (DHS Form 10008); (9) 

Application for SAFETY Act 

Certification (DHS Form 10007); (10) 

SAFETY Act Block Designation 

Application (DHS Form 10005); and (11) 

SAFETY Act Block Certification 

Application (DHS Form 10004). 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until March 4, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number DHS– 

2013–0001, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Please follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: 

douglas.m.smith@hq.dhs.gov. Please 

include docket number DHS–2013–0001 

in the subject line of the message. 

• Mail: Science and Technology 

Directorate, ATTN: SAFETY Act, 245 

Murray Lane SW., Mail Stop 0202, 

Washington, DC 20528. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

douglas.m.smith@hq.dhs.gov (202) 254– 

5604 (Not a toll free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DHS S&T 

provides a secure Web site, accessible 

through www.SAFETYAct.gov, through 

which the public can learn about the 

program, submit applications for 

SAFETY Act protections, submit 

questions to the Office of SAFETY Act 

Implementation (OSAI), and provide 

feedback. The data collection forms 

have standardized the collection of 

information that is both necessary and 

essential for the DHS OSAI. 

The SAFETY Act program promotes 

the development and use of antiterrorism technologies that will enhance 

the protection of the nation and 

provides risk management and litigation 

management protections for sellers of 

Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology 

(QATT) and others in the supply and 

distribution chain. The Department of 

Homeland Security Science & 

Technology Directorate (DHS S&T) 

currently has approval to collect 

information for the implementation of 

the SAFETY Act program until March 

31, 2013. With this notice, DHS S&T 

seeks approval to renew this 

information collection for continued use 

after this date. The SAFETY Act 

program requires the collection of this 

information in order to evaluate and 

qualify Anti-Terrorism Technologies, 

based on the economic and technical 

criteria contained in the Regulations 

Implementing the Support AntiTerrorism by Fostering Effective 

Technologies Act (the Final Rule), for 

protection in accordance with the Act, 

and therefore encourage the 

development and deployment of new 

and innovative anti-terrorism products 

and services. The Support AntiTerrorism by Fostering Effective 

Technologies (SAFETY) Act (6 U.S.C. 

441) was enacted as part of the 

Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public 

Law 107– 296 establishing this 

requirement. This notice and request for 

comments is required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. chapter 35). 

DHS S&T currently has approval to 

collect information utilizing the 

Registration of a Seller as an AntiTerrorism Technology (DHS Form 

10010), Request for a Pre-Application 

Consultation (DHS Form 10009), Notice 

of License of Qualified Anti-Terrorism 

Technology (DHS Form 10003), Notice 

of Modification of Qualified AntiTerrorism Technology (DHS Form 

10002), Application for Transfer of 

SAFETY Act Designation and 

Certification (DHS Form 10001), 

Application for Renewal Of SAFETY 

Act Protections of a Qualified AntiTerrorism Technology (DHS Form 

10057), Application for SAFETY Act 

Developmental Testing and Evaluation 

Designation (DHS Form 10006), 

Application for SAFETY Act 

Designation (DHS Form 10008), 

Application for SAFETY Act 

Certification (DHS Form 10007), 

SAFETY Act Block Designation 

Application (DHS Form 10005), 

SAFETY Act Block Certification 

Application (DHS Form 10004) until 31 

March 2013 with OMB approval number 

1640–0001. 

The Department is committed to 

improving its information collection 

and urges all interested parties to 

suggest how these materials can further 

reduce burden while seeking necessary 

information under the Act. 

DHS is particularly interested in 

comments that: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Suggest ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and 

(4) Suggest ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology, e.g., permitting electronic 

submissions of responses. 

Overview of Information Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Existing information collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

SAFETY Act Program. 

(3) Agency Form Number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Homeland Security 

sponsoring the collection: DHS Science 

& Technology Directorate, DHS Forms 

10001, 10002, 10003, 10004, 10005, 

10006, 10007, 10008, 10009, 10010, and 

10057. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Business entities, Associations, 

and State, Local and Tribal Government 

entities. Applications are reviewed for 

benefits, technology/program 

evaluations, and regulatory compliance. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: 

a. Estimate of the total number of 

respondents: 950. 

b. An estimate of the time for an 

average respondent to respond: 18.2 

burden hours. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: 17,300 burden hours. 

Gregg Piermarini, 

Deputy Chief Information Officer for Science 

and Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02125 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–9F–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

[Docket ID FEMA–2012–0003: Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1272] 

Proposed Flood Hazard 

Determinations 

Correction 

In notice document 2012–27366, 

appearing on pages 67016–67018 in the 

issue of Thursday, November 8, 2012, 

make the following corrections: 

1. On page 67016, in the Table titled 

‘‘Osage County, Oklahoma, and 

Incorporated Areas,’’ the entry for the 

‘‘Maps Available for Inspection Online 

at:’’ Link is corrected to read as follows: 

http://riskmap6.com/ 

Community.aspx?cid=229&sid=4 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES