alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection withthe accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2006 that is being filed concurrently with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officersof Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Clayton W. Williams, Jr.                                     |   |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Clayton W. Williams   Chief Executive Officer   November 9, 2006 |   |   |
|   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|   |   |                                                             |   |   |
|   |   | /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                                 |   |   |
|   |   | Mel G. Riggs   Chief Financial Officer   November 9, 2006        |   |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 87 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 87

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

Mr. Tom Price of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Budget (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $10,380,424 for the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,190,212 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $5,190,212 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2652

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff Appellee

v.

Rickey R. Norton, Jr.

Defendant Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: March 19, 2020

Filed: March 24, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Norton appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release

and sentenced him to a prison term within the advisory range under Chapter 7 of the

1The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”) and an additional term

of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and argues the revocation

sentence is substantively unreasonable.

We conclude the revocation sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See

United States v. McGhee, 869 F.3d 703, 705-06 (8th Cir. 2017) (per curiam)

(revocation sentences are reviewed for abuse of discretion). The sentence was within

the advisory Guidelines range and the statutory requirements. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e)(3), (h). Furthermore, the district court referenced the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors, and explained its reasons for the decision; and there is no

indication the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to

an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing

relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009)

(en banc) (discussing substantive reasonableness; permitting, on appeal, presumption

of reasonableness for Guidelines-range sentence). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
2021 Equine Case Reports of Eastern Equine Encephalitis 

reported to the ArboNET reporting system as of 01/11/2022 

STATE COUNTY # EQUINE CASES 

AL Baldwin County 1 

AL Covington County 1 

AL Geneva County 1 

AL Mobile County 1 

AR Chicot County 1 

AR Columbia County 1 

AR Pulaski County 3 

AR Stone County 1 

FL Bay County 1 

FL Bradford County 1 

FL Duval County 1 

FL Glades County 1 

FL Hendry County 1 

FL Jackson County 1 

FL Jefferson County 2 

FL Lake County 2 

FL Leon County 1 

FL Levy County 2 

FL Liberty County 1 

FL Madison County 1 

FL Nassau County 2 

FL Santa Rosa County 1 

FL Volusia County 2 

FL Walton County 1 

GA Long County 1 

LA Acadia Parish 1 

LA Beauregard Parish 6 

LA Calcasieu Parish 2 

LA Evangeline Parish 1 

LA Iberville Parish 1 

LA Jefferson Davis Parish 4 

LA Lafeyette Parish 1 

LA Pointe Coupee Parish 1 

LA Rapides Parish 2 

LA St. Landry Parish 2 

LA St. Martin Parish 1 

LA St. Tammany Parish 2 

LA Tangipahoa Parish 3 

LA Vermilion Parish 4 

LA Vernon Parish 1 
LA Webster Parish 1 

LA West Baton Rouge Parish 1 

MI Barry County 1 

MI Genesee County 1 

MI Gladwin County 1 

MI Ingham County 1 

MI Livingston County 2 

MI Otsego County 1 

MI Shiawassee County 2 

MN Itasca County 1 

MS Greene County 1 

MS Harrison County 1 

MS Jackson County 2 

NJ Atlantic County 1 

NJ Camden County 1 

NJ Cumberland County 1 

NY Cattaraugus County 1 

NY Oswego County 3 

NY Ulster County 1 

NC Brunswick County 1 

NC Onslow County 1 

NC Pender County 1 

PA Mercer County 1 

SC Colleton County 1 

SC Sumter County 1 

TX Bowie County 2 

TX Harris County 1 

TX Henderson County 1 

TX Jasper County 1 

TX Leon County 1 

VA Dinwiddie County 1 

WI Burnett County 1 

WI Calumet County 1 

WI Chippewa County 1 

WI Clark County 1 

WI Green Lake County 1 

WI Marquette County 1 

WI Monroe County 1 

WI Shawano County 1 

WI Taylor County 1 

WI Waupaca County 1 

Total 111
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
# C_2020230EN.01001301.xml

| 13.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-384/19) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Flood risk assessment and management - Directive 2007/60/EC - Article 7(1) and (5), Article 10(1) and (2) and Article 15(1) - Flood risk management plan - Establishment - Public consultation and information - Making available to the European Commission - River basin districts ES 120 Gran Canaria, ES 122 Fuerteventura, ES 123 Lanzarote, ES 124 Tenerife, ES 125 La Palma, ES 126 La Gomera and ES 127 El Hierro (Spain))

(2020/C 230/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented initially by E. Manhaeve and E. Sanfrutos Cano, and subsequently by M. Jauregui Gomez and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by S. Jiménez García, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing, within the time limit prescribed, to establish, publish and notify to the European Commission the flood risk management plans in respect of the river basin districts ES 120 Gran Canaria, ES 122 Fuerteventura, ES 123 Lanzarote, ES 124 Tenerife, ES 125 La Palma, ES 126 La Gomera and ES 127 El Hierro (Spain), the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(1) and (5) and Article 15(1) of Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks; and by failing, within the time limit prescribed, to complete the public consultation and information on the elaboration of flood risk management plans in respect of the river basin districts ES 120 Gran Canaria, ES 122 Fuerteventura and ES 125 La Palma, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10(1) and (2) of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing, within the time limit prescribed, to establish, publish and notify to the European Commission the flood risk management plans in respect of the river basin districts ES 120 Gran Canaria, ES 122 Fuerteventura, ES 123 Lanzarote, ES 124 Tenerife, ES 125 La Palma, ES 126 La Gomera and ES 127 El Hierro (Spain), the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(1) and (5) and Article 15(1) of Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks; and by failing, within the time limit prescribed, to complete the public consultation and information on the elaboration of flood risk management plans in respect of the river basin districts ES 120 Gran Canaria, ES 122 Fuerteventura and ES 125 La Palma, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10(1) and (2) of that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.

---
January 8, 1998

20277

#### Bank of America, FSB v. Jennett

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      12,029,015
<SECURITIES>                                   650,070
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,597,643
<PP&E>                                       5,156,039
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,615,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,139,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,040,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,833
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,345,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,139,785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,875,906
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,735,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,859,393)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,859,393)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,859,393)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|--------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                |                                        
|                | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|Date:           |                                        
|August 20, 2003 | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                |
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-K for the
        period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 **/s/THOMAS
                    A. MURDOCK**Thomas
                    A. MurdockChief
                    Executive Officer
 
 Dated
        March 20, 2006
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Steven D. Bonham, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Unify Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| | /s/ STEVEN D. BONHAM                         | 
| | -------------------------------------------- | 
| | Steven D. Bonham                            
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: December 14, 2007

31

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mitchell Klupt, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

March 15, 1971.

*James 8. Pha/ir*for petitioner.

John D. Behnett, S.

The decedent was a trustee under the will be Fred D. Mott and letters were issued by the Surrogate of Kings County. After the death of the decedent herein, the petitioner was appointed successor trustee of the Mott trust by the Surrogate of Kings County.

After the death of the decedent, his will was probated and letters testamentary were issued to his spouse. The petition herein sets forth that a demand was made of the executrix of the within estate to turn over the trust assets to the successor trustee of the Mott trust. The petition states that the request was not honored and the petitioner petitioned the Surrogate of Kings County to take and state the account of the decedent. The 'Surrogate of Kings County granted the petition and a decree was signed by the Surrogate and a judgment in the amount of $129,958.56 was docketed. The petitioner now seeks court approval for leave to levy execution against the within estate on said judgment pursuant to CPLR 5208.

CPLR 5208 deals with judgments obtained against decedents during their lifetime. It does not deal with judgments against the decedent’s estate after his death. In addition thereto, the petitioner cannot be granted any greater preference than that set forth under SCPA 1811. A judgment against an estate obtained after the decedent’s lifetime has no greater preference than a valid claim against an estate. The decree obtained by the petitioner establishes the value of the trust and the existence of a claim only *(Matter of Gilbert,*145 Misc. 901). Such a decree is not conclusive evidence that there are sufficient assets in the hands of the fiduciary to satisfy the claim *(Matter of Seaman,*63 App. Div. 49; see SCPA 602).

The petitioner herein, since his claim has been rejected, should either petition for a compulsory accounting or he should peti*823tion for reverse discovery proceedings against the fiduciary pursuant to SOPA 2105. During the course of such a proceeding, the court would also be able to determine whether the estate herein has an interest in the realty mentioned in the petition which would therefore become an asset of the estate and could be utilized for the payment of claims. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
July 2021 

There were 11 surveillance inspections conducted at 11 different sites for a total of 

110 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to increase in response to the 

warmer air temperatures. All sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and 

were scheduled for monthly sampling. Routine harvest continued. No cages were 

confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

August 2020 50 0 23286

September 2020 50 0 23336

October 2020 45 0 23381

November 2020 35 0 23416

December 2020 45 0 23461

January 2021 45 0 23506

February 2021 45 0 23551

March 2021 46 0 23597

April 2021 50 0 23647

May 2021 90 0 23737

June 2021 120 0 23857

July 2021 110 0 23967
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.01

                                  CERTIFICATION
                   PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SS. 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
First Quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Fisher Scientific International Inc. (the
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                        /s/ Paul M. Montrone
                        ---------------------------
                        Paul M. Montrone
                        Chief Executive Officer
                        Date: May 10, 2005