alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. McKernan, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify in such capacity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods reflected
therein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 9, 2006



By:

/s/    JOHN R. MCKERNAN, JR.John R. McKernan, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 858 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 858

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 13, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3590) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to repeal the increase in the income threshold used in determining the 
deduction for medical care. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2020061EN.01003801.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/38

---

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2019 — Kipper v Commission

(Case T-394/18)

(Independent service provider for the Commission (free-lance) - Application for social benefits granted to officials in category B - Lack of jurisdiction)

(2020/C 61/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Michael Kipper (Remich, Luxembourg) (represented by: H-J. Dupré, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for various social benefits granted to officials in category B.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed for having been brought before a court that has no jurisdiction to hear it. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed for having been brought before a court that has no jurisdiction to hear it.

| 2. | Mr Michael Kipper is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Michael Kipper is ordered to pay the costs.

---
100



                                     EXHIBIT 23

                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
CDI Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-7263,
333-65879,  333-69007 and 333-34508 on Form S-8 of CDI Corp. and in Registration
Statement No. 333-9793 on Form S-3 of CDI Corp. of our report dated February 20,
2002 relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of CDI Corp. and subsidiaries
as of  December  31, 2001 and 2000 and the related  consolidated  statements  of
earnings,  shareholders'  equity  and cash  flows  for each of the  years in the
three-year  period ended December 31, 2001 and the related  financial  statement
schedule,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2001 annual  report on Form
10-K of CDI Corp.

Philadelphia, PA                                      /s/ KPMG LLP
March 18, 2002                                    ----------------------------
                                                      KPMG LLP
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 111 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5319]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  ORDERS FOR WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 2012

  Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that when the 
Senate completes its business today, it adjourn until 9:30 a.m., on 
Wednesday, July 25; that following the prayer and pledge, the Journal 
of proceedings be approved to date, the morning hour be deemed to have 
expired, and the time for the two leaders be reserved for their use 
later in the day; that the majority leader be recognized; that the time 
until 2:15 p.m. be equally divided and controlled between the two 
leaders or their designees, with the Republicans controlling the first 
30 minutes and the majority controlling the second 30 minutes; further, 
that at 2:15 p.m., the Senate proceed to a rollcall vote on the motion 
to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 3412, the Middle Class 
Tax Cut Act.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
#### State v. Williams

20511

9/18/98

Vacated & Remanded
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JERRY LILLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND

D/B/A WESTAR INDUSTRIES,

 Appellant,

v.

CHRIS PHAM, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

FOR ALEX PHAM,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00135-CV

Appeal from

352nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 352-280346-15)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order 

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
# C_2008037EN.01003102.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/31

---

Action brought on 3 December 2007 — Rotter v OHIM (EU-BRUZZEL)

(Case T-449/07)

(2008/C 37/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Rotter (Munich, Germany) (represented by M. Müller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | To annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 September 2007 in Case R 1415/2006-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

To annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 September 2007 in Case R 1415/2006-4;

| — | To order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred during the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

To order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred during the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional mark ‘EU-BRUZZEL’ for goods and services in Classes 29, 30 and 43 (application No 4 346 185).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection in part of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), since the mark applied for is distinctive in relation to the contested charcuterie goods.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2018399EN.01005501.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/55

---

Action brought on 20 September 2018 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Beko (BECON)

(Case T-557/18)

(2018/C 399/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Beko plc (Watford, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BECON — Application for registration No 13 142 336

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2018 in Case R 41/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision as far as the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division was dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision as far as the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division was dismissed;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
 November 15, 2016 

William Kitchen 
 Dear Bill: 

Citizens Business Bank and Valley Business Bank continue to review staffing needs in connection with the proposed merger of Valley Business
Bank into Citizens Business Bank. As a result, Citizens Business Bank is pleased to offer you a full-time position with Citizens Business Bank, contingent upon the closing of the proposed merger (the “Closing”), which is currently
expected to occur during the first quarter of 2017. The offer is subject to your remaining in good standing at all times under all Valley Business Bank’s current employment policies and practices, and the satisfactory completion of Citizens
Business Bank’s background check and drug screening process. 
 As of the Closing, you will become an employee of Citizens Business
Bank. You will assume the position of Senior Vice President and Center Manager with a base salary of $182,790. In your position, you will be working for Citizens Business Bank, and the position will be classified as exempt. Your
employment with Citizens Business Bank will be employment at-will. As such, the employment relationship is based on the mutual consent of the associate and Citizens Business Bank. As we approach the Closing, Citizens Business Bank will arrange for
an orientation process that will include prospective benefits enrollment. 
 The Closing is contingent on customary conditions, including
the receipt of required regulatory approvals. Until the Closing, Citizens Business Bank and Valley Business Bank will continue to operate as independent companies. Business will continue as usual. Your employment with Valley Business Bank continues
to be at-will. Since you are receiving an offer of employment from Citizens Business Bank, you will not be eligible for severance benefits from Valley Business Bank as a result of the Closing. 

We appreciate your commitment to Valley Business Bank and look forward to working with you as a Citizens Business Bank associate in the near
future. We will continue to communicate with you in the months ahead to ensure a smooth transition. Please contact David Krebs at (909) 483-7128, your manager, or Valley Business Bank Human Resources with any questions that you may have in the
interim. 
 Please acknowledge your acceptance of our contingent offer by signing below and returning this document by November 22,
2016 to David M. Krebs, Senior Vice President and Director of Human Resources, Citizens Business Bank, at 701 North Haven Avenue, Suite 140, Ontario, California 91764. 

We are excited to have you as a valued member of the Citizens Business Bank team. 

Sincerely, 
  

					
			
	 /s/ Christopher D. Myers
	 		 	 /s/ Allan W. Stone

	 Christopher D. Myers
	 		 	 Allan W. Stone

	 President and Chief Executive Officer

Citizens Business Bank
	 		 	 President and Chief Executive Officer

Valley Business Bank


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: 
  

									
	 Employee Name:
	  	 	  		  		  	
		  	(Please Print)	  		  		  	
					
	 Employee Signature:
	  	 	  	 Date:
CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
           Three Months Ended   March 31,   2005  2004 **Basic Earnings Per Share**        Net income $666,813  $521,451          Weighted averagecommon shares  2,644,965   2,644,350        **Basic EarningsPer Share** $0.25  $0.20                 **Diluted Earnings Per Share**        Net income $666,813  $521,451 Weighted averagecommon shares  2,644,965   2,644,350 Weighted average effect ofassumed stock options  8,797   3,726                 Total  2,653,762   2,648,076                 **Diluted EarningsPer Share** $0.25  $0.20
# Forms Archives - Appalachian Regional Commission

- ARC Budget Revision Worksheet, Construction This worksheet must be filled out to request revisions to current ARC grants for construction projects.The post ARC Budget Revision Worksheet, Construction appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Budget Revision Worksheet, Non-Construction This worksheet must be filled out to request budget revisions to current ARC grants. The post ARC Budget Revision Worksheet, Non-Construction appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Performance Progress Report Form (ARC-PPR) Use this as the coversheet for your interim and final progress report narrative if you email reports to ARC.The post Performance Progress Report Form (ARC-PPR) appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Reimbursement and Payment Advance Request Worksheets This form accompanies the SF270 to make up the interim and final financial reports for grantees that email reports to ARC. The post Reimbursement and Payment Advance Request Worksheets appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Standard Form 270–Request for Advance or Reimbursement This form accompanies the Reimbursement and Payment Advance Request Worksheets and makes up one-half of the interim and final financial reports for grantees that email reports to ARC. The post Standard Form 270–Request for Advance or Reimbursement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010011EN.01000202.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-154/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 2 and Article 4(1), (2) and (5) - Harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment - Taxable persons - Activities or operations carried out by ‘registradores de la propiedad’ (land registrars) acting as settlement agents in charge of settlement offices of a mortgage district - Economic activities - Activity carried out independently - Public-law bodies carrying out activities in connection with their public duties - Infringement of Community law attributable to a national court)

2010/C 11/03

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Afonso and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J.M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 2 and 4(1) and (2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Taxable persons — Activities or operations carried out by ‘registradores de la propiedad’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by considering that the services supplied to an Autonomous Community by ‘registradores de la propiedad’ acting as settlement agents in charge of a settlement office of a mortgage district (‘oficina liquidadora de distrito hipotecario’) are not subject to value added tax, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 and Article 4(1) and (2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by considering that the services supplied to an Autonomous Community by ‘registradores de la propiedad’ acting as settlement agents in charge of a settlement office of a mortgage district (‘oficina liquidadora de distrito hipotecario’) are not subject to value added tax, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 and Article 4(1) and (2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment;

| 2. | orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 05.07.2008.

1

---
#### Willard SHRODER, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF the LAND OFFICE of said State, and Shell Oil Company, a corporation, Defendants in Error.

No. 38554.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 2, 1960.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1960.

*374Byron Boone and James O. Ellison, Tulsa, and Savage, Gibson, Benefield & Shelton, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

R. H. Dunn, N. A. Gibson and Francis Stewart, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

In this action the defendants in error, the State of Oklahoma ex rel. the Commissioners of the Land Office and Shell Oil Company, a corporation, seek to establish their asserted fee simple title to the E/2 of Sec. 36, T. 28N, R. 25W, Harper County, Oklahoma, as to adverse claims of the plaintiff in error based upon a mineral conveyance made by the certificate of purchaser-holder, Earl McAtee, prior to his certificate being forfeited by proceeding conducted by said Commissioners in 1935 and 1936. The certificate of purchase was filed of record in the office of the county clerk March 22, 1929. The mineral conveyance upon which plaintiff in error bases his title was filed of record in the office of the County Clerk of Harper County, Oklahoma, after the certificate of purchase was recorded but prior to the institution of said proceedings. The mineral conveyance to plaintiff in error is under date of October 6, 1942. None of the mineral conveyances were filed in the office of the Commissioners of the Land Office. No notice was given in the forfeiture proceedings to those who had recorded their mineral conveyances with the county clerk.

The issues in this case are the same as those considered and determined in No. 38,379, Equitable Royalty Corporation v. State of Oklahoma, Okl., 352 P.2d 365. Our opinion in No. 38,379 is determinative of issues presented by this appeal and is therefore adopted as the opinion in this, case.

Affirmed.

DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, JOHNSON, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and BERRY, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4911]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          MORNING-HOUR DEBATE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of 
January 17, 2012, the Chair will now recognize Members from lists 
submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning-hour debate.
  The Chair will alternate recognition between the parties, with each 
party limited to 1 hour and each Member other than the majority and 
minority leaders and the minority whip limited to 5 minutes each, but 
in no event shall debate continue beyond 11:50 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141759) and Amendment No. 386 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 




 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 27, 2016