alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Todd E. Wille, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Unify Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants third fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| | /s/ TODD E. WILLE            
| | -----------------------------
| | Todd E. Wille                
| | President and Chief Executive
| | Officer                      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 15, 2007



---
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-181612) and Amendment No. 547 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.









/s/ Ernst &  Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania




December 27, 2016
Khapra Beetle (KhB)

2024 Quick Reference

Program: Khapra Beetle (KhB)

Application: ArcGIS Field Maps

Host: USDA-MRP GIS Enterprise (portal)

Map Title: PPQ KhB Trapping Surveys 2024 Field Map

CHECK URL! https://maps.mrp.usda.gov/arcgis/

IMPORTANT!! You must synchronize your map at the beginning/end of each workday.*

1. Open ArcGIS Field Maps. Confirm the correct ArcGIS Enterprise URL.

2. Open previously downloaded map area.

3. Stand at the point you wish to collect.

4. From the menu bar at the top of the page, tap the Layers icon to toggle ON the

layers you wish to view/edit.

KhB Trap Sites

1. Tap the blue plus sign in the lower-right corner of the map to add data. 

2. Choose “New KhB Trap Site” from the list on the left.

3. Complete the data form (Verify the Install Date field is Today.)

4. Tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

KhB Trap Activities 

1. Tap the trap symbol on the map to select it. The data form opens on the left.

2. Scroll down and tap KhB Trap Activities 2024 or tap the link icon. 

3. Tap the blue Add button. 

4. Complete the data form. (Verify the Activity Date field is Today.)

5. Tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

KhB Map Notes Points

1. Tap the blue plus sign in the lower-right corner of the map to add data. 

2. Choose from KhB Map Notes (Info or Hazard) from the list on the left.

3. Complete the data form. (Verify the Note Date is Today.)

4. Tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

If the Submit button fails, you have not completed all required fields or GPS accuracy failed.

To preserve battery power, put the device to sleep between surveys. 

*For more details, refer to the PPQ Khapra Beetle Trapping User Manual.

Photo credit: Natasha Wright, Braman Termite & 

Pest Elimination, Budwood.org

ArcGIS Field Maps 

Mobile Application

Add data button

Layers icon

Activity link icon
| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date: August 12, 2010 | /s/James A. Cannavino   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | James A. Cannavino      |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

----

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934); and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 12, 2010 |                    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | /s/ Michael J. Beecher  |
|                  | Michael J. Beecher      |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |
# C_2020045EN.01003403.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Nice — France) — VT, WU v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

(Case C-395/19) (1)

(2020/C 45/34)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.

---
# C_2019246EN.01002401.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/24

---

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Apple v EUIPO — Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT)

(Case T-685/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 246/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: J. Olsen and P. Andreottola, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL (La Hulpe, Belgium) (represented by: G. Glas, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 August 2018 (Case R 476/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL and Apple Inc.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Apple Inc. and Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL shall each bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Apple Inc. and Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication SCRL shall each bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
# C_2018161EN.01006702.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/67

---

Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Ruhorimbere v Council

(Case T-175/18)

(2018/C 161/83)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Éric Ruhorimbere (Mbujimayi, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 14 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 14 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 14 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 14 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-163/18, Amisi Kumba v Council.

Amisi Kumba

Council

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 06, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0031. OSPREY COVE REAL ESTATE, LLC v. TOWERVIEW CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV89
June 24, 1999

21455

#### Clark v. State

Affirmed
H. Res. 649 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 17, 2016. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 639) authorizing 

the Speaker to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the 

House of Representatives in the matter of United States, et 

al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15–674. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the resolution to its adoption without intervening 

motion or demand for division of the question except: (1) one 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules; and (2) 

one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT OT
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report), I, James E. Dixon, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.

James E. Dixon, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003
FILED

December 30, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

 AT NASHVILLE

 DECEMBER 1997 SESSION 

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) 

) C.C.A. No. 01C01-9701-CC-00033 

Appellee, )

) Montgomery County

V. )

) Honorable John H. Gasaway, III, Judge

)

CARLA SMITH, ) (Assault & Driving on a Revoked License) 

) 

Appellant. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

Michael R. Jones John Knox Walkup

District Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter 

Collier W. Goodlett, Jr. Daryl J. Brand

Assistant Public Defender Assistant Attorney General

109 S. Second Street Criminal Justice Division

Clarksville, TN 37040 450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

John W. Carney, Jr.

District Attorney General

Steven L. Garrett

Assistant District Attorney General

204 Franklin Street, Suite 200

` Clarksville, TN 37040

OPINION FILED: ___________________

AFFIRMED

PAUL G. SUMMERS,

Judge

O P I N I O N
-2-

The appellant, Carla Smith, pled guilty to assault and driving on a

revoked license. She received an effective sentence of eleven months and

twenty-nine days probation. A probation violation warrant issued alleging that

the appellant failed to report, did not fulfill educational requirements, and did not

pay various fees and fines. The hearing court found the allegations and the

warrant to be valid and revoked the appellant’s probation. She appeals to this

Court. We affirm the court’s disposition.

The appellant is no neophyte to the system. She has previously been

on post-trial diversion and probation prior to this revocation. The court found

sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations made in the revocation warrant. 

We agree with the hearing court’s findings.

Appointed counsel for the appellant cites Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1976); and we duly note his position. Counsel also moves in his brief to be

allowed to withdraw. We respectfully deny the request for withdrawal at this

time. Counsel may resubmit the motion pursuant to Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 14 at the

appropriate time.

This Court finds that the evidence does not preponderate against the

findings of the trial court. Furthermore, there is no error of law which would

mandate a reversal. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in revoking

probation. See State v. Harkins, 811 S.W.2d 79, 82 (Tenn. 1991). Hence, we

affirm the judgment of the trial court revoking probation pursuant to Tenn. Ct. of

Crim. App. Rule 20.

______________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge
-3-

CONCUR:

______________________________

JOSEPH B. JONES, Presiding Judge

______________________________

WILLIAM M. BARKER, Judge
# C_2019399EN.01006002.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/60

---

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2019 — ZH v ECHA

(Case T-617/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - 2016 staff report - Sick leave - Claim for compensation - Complaint brought after expiry of the three-month period prescribed by Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Force majeure - Excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 399/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZH (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, T. Zbihlej and C.-M. Bergerat, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the applicant’s 2016 staff report and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | ZH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

ZH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
#### Ben-Dor v. Jewett

19551

2/13/98

Reversed, Vacated and Remanded
# C_2007297EN.01004301.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/43

---

Action brought on 24 September 2007 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-377/07)

(2007/C 297/87)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission's decision of the Direction General for Informatics to reject the bid of the applicant — filed in response to the open Call for Tender ENTR/05/86 — Content Interoperability for European eGovernment Services (OJ S 128, 8.7.2006) communicated to the applicant by letter dated 13 July 2007 and to award the contracts to the successful contractor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision of the Direction General for Informatics to reject the bid of the applicant — filed in response to the open Call for Tender ENTR/05/86 — Content Interoperability for European eGovernment Services (OJ S 128, 8.7.2006) communicated to the applicant by letter dated 13 July 2007 and to award the contracts to the successful contractor;

| — | order the Commission (DIGIT) to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission (DIGIT) to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected;

| — | order the Commission (DIGIT) to pay the applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question for an amount of EUR 3,5 million for lot 2. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission (DIGIT) to pay the applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question for an amount of EUR 3,5 million for lot 2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submitted a bid in response to the defendant's call for an open tender for the contract ‘content interoperability technologies for European eGovernment services’ (OJ 2006/S 128-136080). The applicant contests the decision to reject its bid and to award the contract to another bidder.

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-300/07 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
   (1).

Evropaïki Dynamiki

Commission

1

---

(1)  JO 2007 C 235, p. 22.

1

---