alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020287EN.01001702.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/17

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary

(Case C-390/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - Sugar sector - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic - Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)

(2020/C 287/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Colelli and M.F. Severi, avvocatti dello Stato)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents), French Republic, Hungary

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (the Company) on Form S-8 [Registration Nos.
33-42677 (Non-employee Directors Stock Option Plan), 33-42678 (Stock Incentive
Plan), 33-51460 (Section 401(k) Plan), 33-60663 (Retirement Plan), 33-60661 and
33-65351 (Employee Stock Ownership Plan), 33-60665 (Consultants, Agents, and 
Part Time Employees Stock Plan) and 33-51812 (Employee Stock Purchase Plan)]
and on Form S-3 [Registration No. 33-51677 (600,000 Warrants)] of our report
dated March 8, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of ICF Kaiser International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1995 and February 28, 1995, and for the ten months ended
December 31, 1995 and for the years ended February 28,  1994 and 1995, which 
report is included in the Company's Transition Report on Form 10-K.



                                                        Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Washington, D.C.
March 29, 1996
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Todd E. Wille, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Unify Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants third fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| | /s/ TODD E. WILLE            
| | -----------------------------
| | Todd E. Wille                
| | President and Chief Executive
| | Officer                      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: December 14, 2007



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1,265
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                           338
<INVENTORY>                                          4,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    14,568
<PP&E>                                              51,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                      15,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      60,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               15,856
<BONDS>                                             11,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               638
<OTHER-SE>                                          29,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        60,182
<SALES>                                             22,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    30,941
<CGS>                                               14,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       21,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     10,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,144
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,144
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.84



</TABLE>
#### Hanwen LIU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71928. Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 26, 2005.

*232Douglas Ingraham, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Angela Davis, Asst. U.S. Atty., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, William C. Minick, DOJ — -U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Hanwen Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the adverse credibility determination. The IJ’s adverse credibility findings fail because the omissions identified in Liu’s testimony and asylum application, which involve a police shut down of a Falun Gong gathering and a police search of Liu’s home, were minor details within consistent and detailed testimony. *See Bandari v. INS,*227 F.3d 1160, 1166-67 (9th Cir. 2000). Furthermore, the BIA’s determination that Liu’s testimony was inconsistent is not supported by substantial evidence because Liu’s statements, regarding his experiences at a labor camp, do not conflict. *See id.*at 1167.

We therefore grant the petition and remand for further proceedings so that the BIA can address the merits of Liu’s case. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Appeal of the SOUTHWESTERN ART ASS’N, from an Order of the County Board of Equalization of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

No. 37392.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Oct. 8, 1957.

*611J. Howard Edmondson, County Atty. of Tulsa County, Donald D. Cameron, Chief Civil Asst., Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

J. C. Pinkerton, Tulsa, for defendant, in error.

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Tulsa County Assessor from a judgment of the District Court of Tulsa County, fixing the valuation, for ad valorem tax purposes for the years 1953, 1954, and 1955, of a certain building in the City of Tulsa known as the Beacon Building which was owned and operated by the Southwestern Art Association. The protest and subsequent proceedings as to assessment for each of said years constituted a separate matter, on appeal but all three were consolidated in the district court over objection of the assessor. The parties will be referred to as “assessor” and “protestant.” ...

The- value placed upon the lot upon which the building stood was fixed for taxation at $92,810 for each of said years and no question was raised with regard to it. This litigation is concerned with the assessed valuation of the building which was fixed by the assessor at-$342,560 for the years 1953 and 1954 and at $364,930 for the year 1955. The judgment of the trial court from which this appeal was taken fixed said values at $197,669.23 and $216,129.75, respectively.

Except for minor differences in the evidence, this case is identical as to issues and question of law to cause numbered 37,417, styled Appeal of National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa, Okl., 316 P.2d 175. Our opinion in that case, promulgated on the 17th day of September, 1957, is dispositive of the instant case. Therefore, said opinion and syllabus therein is approved and adopted as the syllabus and opinion herein, and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

CORN, V. C. J., and HALLEY, WILLIAMS, JACKSON, and CARLILE, JJ-, concur.

WELCH, C. J. and JOHNSON and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur by reason of stare decisis.
#### State v. Sullivan.

17926

1/29/97

Vacated and Remanded
crowd_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
 
RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS
 
OF
 
CROWD 4 SEEDS, INC.
 
The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this 30th day of December, 2016. 
 
WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to effectuate a new Board of Directors of the Company; 
 
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected: 
 
MR. KOK CHEE LEE as Director & CEO
MS. SIEW HEOK ONG CFO
MS.SREYNEANG JIN as Executive Director & COO
 
The Above qualified people have been nominated, and have accepted their position as DIRECTORS and OFFICERS of the Company. 
 
Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records. 
 
 
	Dated: 30th December, 2016	 
	  
	 

	 	
	Mr. Xinyu Wang 
	 
	on behalf of Tycoon Luck Global Limited, Majority Shareholders
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 575 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 575

 Expressing disapproval of the occupation of Malheur National Wildlife 
                Refuge by a group of armed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2016

Mr. Grijalva submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing disapproval of the occupation of Malheur National Wildlife 
                Refuge by a group of armed individuals.

Whereas, on Saturday January 2, 2016, a number of armed individuals broke into 
        and occupied the headquarters building at the Malheur National Wildlife 
        Refuge in Harney County, Oregon;
Whereas these individuals have continued to unlawfully occupy and block access 
        to the refuge headquarters in violation of Federal law, disrupting 
        operations of the refuge;
Whereas these individuals have prevented 20 refuge employees from reporting to 
        work and prevented refuge employees living on the refuge from accessing 
        their homes;
Whereas the unlawful actions of these individuals are harming the local 
        community, including forcing local officials to close public schools in 
        the area for security reasons;
Whereas these actions have forced closure of at least one other Federal facility 
        in the area;
Whereas the Harney County Sheriff and local residents, including Dwight and 
        Steven Hammond, have condemned these unlawful actions;
Whereas recent incidents involving these individuals and similar armed groups 
        have resulted in violence, or threats of violence, toward Federal land 
        managers and local and Federal law enforcement officers;
Whereas those engaged in these unlawful activities have publicly called for more 
        armed individuals to come to the refuge;
Whereas at least one elected official has already offered inflammatory 
        statements supporting these unlawful actions; and
Whereas it is imperative that this unlawful occupation does not escalate into 
        violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives condemns the unlawful, 
armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and calls on 
those involved to end their occupation and surrender to law enforcement 
authorities immediately.
                                 <all>
```
02/2019 Guidelines for the Regulated Garbage Written Training Program 1

Guidelines for the Regulated Garbage Written Training Program

The establishment must present a training program on regulated garbage 

handling to employees before they are permitted to handle or supervise the 

handling of regulated garbage. All previously trained employees shall be 

provided review training annually; this training may be given in more than one 

session.

The training program must be approved in writing by the local APHIS State 

Plant Health Director/CBP Port Director or his/her designee. The English 

version of the approved training program must be attached to the regulated 

garbage compliance agreement.

The training program must be written in English and any other appropriate 

languages, and must be presented in all appropriate languages. The training 

program should be of sufficient duration to provide the required information on 

regulated garbage handling and may include both formal classroom training 

and on-the-job training.

At a minimum, the training must include:

Definition of regulated garbage

Film, slides, or other training aids on foreign animal and plant diseases 

and pests

Explanation and purpose of the regulations

Review of the establishment’s approved operating procedure (OP)

including proper regulated garbage handling procedures covering all 

procedures conducted by the establishment. The OP must also include 

protocols for reporting and handling emergency spills, maintaining 

control of regulated materials and the cleaning and disinfecting of 

affected areas and equipment.

Review of the regulated garbage compliance agreement

Training Record Keeping Requirements

The establishment must maintain a record of regulated garbage training 

provided to employees and any subcontractors if applicable. The training 

records must include:

The date of the training

The name (s) of the trainees

The specific topics covered during the training

The name of the trainer
Guidelines for the Regulated Garbage Written Training Program

2 Guidelines for the Regulated Garbage Written Training Program 02/2019

These records must be retained for a minimum of three (3) years from the end 

of the month in which the training occurred.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 105 

To permit management of the red snapper by Gulf Coast States and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To permit management of the red snapper by Gulf Coast 

States and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red Snapper Manage5 ment Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE.—The term 

9 ‘‘exclusive economic zone’’ has the meaning given 

10 that term in section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 105 IS

1 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 

2 U.S.C. 1802). 

3 (2) FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The term 

4 ‘‘fishery management plan’’ means a plan for the 

5 sustainability of the red snapper in the Gulf of Mex6 ico and the economic and community benefits of 

7 each of the Gulf coastal States. 

8 (3) GULF COASTAL STATE.—The term ‘‘Gulf 

9 coastal State’’ means— 

10 (A) Alabama; 

11 (B) Florida; 

12 (C) Louisiana; 

13 (D) Mississippi; or 

14 (E) Texas. 

15 SEC. 3. MANAGEMENT OF RED SNAPPER IN THE GULF OF 

16 MEXICO. 

17 Notwithstanding any provision of the Magnuson-Ste18 vens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 

19 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), if each of the Gulf coastal States 

20 agrees to a fishery management plan, the Gulf coastal 

21 States shall have exclusive authority to manage and con22 serve the red snapper in the waters of each Gulf coastal 

23 State and the exclusive economic zone in the Gulf of Mex24 ico. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 105 IS

1 SEC. 4. FUNDING. 

2 If each of the Gulf coastal States agrees to a fishery 

3 management plan, the Secretary of Commerce shall pro4 vide appropriate funding to the Gulf coastal States to 

5 carry out necessary stock assessments and data collection 

6 related to the red snapper fishery in the Gulf of Mexico. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2020423EN.01001302.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — GR v Stadt Duisburg

(Case C-720/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 - Article 7, first paragraph - Right of residence of family members of a Turkish worker legally employed in a Member State - Naturalisation of the family member concerned in the host Member State - Maintenance of the right of residence - Acquired rights)

(2020/C 423/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GR

Defendant: Stadt Duisburg

Operative part of the judgment

The first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey must be interpreted as meaning that a member of the family of a Turkish worker who has acquired the rights laid down under that provision shall not lose the benefit of those rights when he or she acquires the nationality of the host Member State while losing his or her previous nationality.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Ilia Lekach, certify that:

(1)   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of E Com  Ventures,
      Inc.;

(2)   Based on my knowledge,  this quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report; and

(3)   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present in all
      material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash
      flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the periods  presented  in this
      quarterly report.

Date:  September 15, 2003

/s/ Ilia Lekach
------------------------
Ilia Lekach
Chief Executive Officer


                                      -20-
59 P.3d 930

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Century 21 Liberty Homes v. Reddish; Reddish v. Century 21 Liberty Homes

25037

12/02/2002

Denied
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of the PrincipalExecutive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas W. McMinn,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 29, 2005 |  /s/ Douglas W. McMinn           |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Douglas W. McMinn,                    |
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----