alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 37 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-135219) and Amendment No. 447 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.









/s/ Ernst &  Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania




December 27, 2016
UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Office of the Secretary 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ERADICATION OF PINK BOLLWORM 

By the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America 

A PROCLAMATION 

WHEREAS cotton production is vital to the U.S. economy, accounting for nearly $27 billion 

in products and services annually according to industry estimates, providing hundreds of 

thousands of jobs across many sectors, and supplying nearly one-third of the raw cotton that is 

traded globally; and 

WHEREAS for more than 100 years the United States has been battling the pink bollworm, one 

of the most destructive cotton pests in the world, which has cost U.S. growers tens of millions of 

dollars annually in control costs and yield losses; and 

WHEREAS the United States Department of Agriculture has worked in close cooperation with 

state departments of agriculture in Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas; industry; and 

cotton growers over the last 18 years to find ways to finally eliminate pink bollworm from all 

cotton-producing areas in the continental United States; and 

WHEREAS the United States Department of Agriculture; state departments of agriculture in 

Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas; industry; and cotton growers banded together to 

carry out a coordinated multi-state program, which included using insect pheromones to disrupt 

mating, planting transgenic cotton, and releasing sterile insects to prevent reproduction; and 

WI:JEREAS after 5 years of extensive survey, the United States Department of Agriculture finds 

all areas of commercial cotton production in the continental United States free of this costly pest; 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sonny Perdue, Secretary of Agriculture, do hereby proclaim that the pink 

bollworm is officially eradicated from cotton-producing areas of the continental United States 

and remove all remaining restrictions on the movement of cotton. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of October 2018, the 

two-hundred forty-third year of the Independence of the United States of 

s�� 

Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     46,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,992
<PP&E>                                          27,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,879
<SALES>                                        123,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,831
<CGS>                                          143,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (110,761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019423EN.01007202.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/72

---

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — YP v Commission

(Case T-562/18) (1)

(2019/C 423/86)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
92 P.3d 1062

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

June 30, 2004

24938

#### Tsai v. Gloria Chi Realty, Inc.

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM R.P.
SCHERER CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,955
<SECURITIES>                                     3,262
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,500
<INVENTORY>                                     59,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               223,834
<PP&E>                                         439,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 728,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,788
<BONDS>                                        141,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                     352,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   728,245
<SALES>                                        588,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               588,699
<CGS>                                          391,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  484,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,275
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.31
        

</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1167 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-36-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

TAY LPC Disc life 

chg 12-01204 4.0 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 4 $1,360.00

pro rated cost of 

disc 10k -6.5% loss 

of life 

$ 0.00 $650 $ 650.00 4 $2,600.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,960

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): ASE Estimate

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# C_2021182EN.01000301.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče — Slovenia) — D.J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija

(Case C-344/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 2 - Concept of ‘working time’ - Stand-by time according to a stand-by system - Specific work maintaining television transmitters situated far away from residential areas - Directive 89/391/EEC - Articles 5 and 6 - Psychosocial risks - Obligation to prevent)

(2021/C 182/03)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: D.J.

Defendant: Radiotelevizija Slovenija

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that a period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system, during which the worker is required only to be contactable by telephone and able to return to his or her workplace, if necessary, within a time limit of one hour, while being able to stay in service accommodation made available to him or her by his or her employer at that workplace, without being required to remain there, does not constitute, in its entirety, working time within the meaning of that provision, unless an overall assessment of all the facts of the case, including the consequences of that time limit and, if appropriate, the average frequency of activity during that period, establishes that the constraints imposed on that worker during that period are such as to affect, objectively and very significantly, the latter’s ability freely to manage, during the same period, the time during which his or her professional services are not required and to devote that time to his or her own interests. The limited nature of the opportunities to pursue leisure activities within the immediate vicinity of the place concerned is irrelevant for the purposes of that assessment.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
#### State v. Nomura

16808

10/16/95

Denied

79 Hawai'i 43903 P.2d 718
# C_2018112EN.01004801.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/48

---

Action brought on 9 February 2018 — AB Mauri Italy v EUIPO — Lesaffre et Compagnie (FERMIN)

(Case T-78/18)

(2018/C 112/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AB Mauri Italy SpA (Casteggio, Italy) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister and G. Hussey, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lesaffre et Compagnie (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark FERMIN — Application for registration No 10 999 613

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 in Joined Cases R 2027/2016-4 and R 2254/2016-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partly annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

partly annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
Agreement
made this 5th day of August 2016 by and between Regen Bioparma, Inc. (“Company”) and David R. Koos (“Koos”)


WHEREAS,
On February 13, 2015 Koos was issued Nine Million of the Company’s Common Shares (“Compensation Common Shares”)
pursuant to that employment agreement entered into by and between Koos and the Company on February 11, 2015 ( “Employment
Agreement”)


WHEREAS
, on March 17, 2015 Koos was issued Two Million Five Hundred Thousand shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (
“Compensation Preferred Stock”)


WHEREAS
the Compensation Common Shares may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by Koos
(“Transfer Restriction”) until 18 months of constant employment of Koos has expired from the date of the full execution
of the Employment Agreement.


WHEREAS
the Compensation Preferred Stock may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by Koos
(“Transfer Restriction”) until 18 months of constant employment of Koos has expired from the date of the full execution
of the Employment Agreement.


THEREFORE,
IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:


		(a)	Koos
                                         shall receive Two Hundred shares of the Company’s Series AA Preferred Stock.



		(b)	Neither
                                         The Compensation Common Shares or the Compensation Preferred Stock may be sold, transferred,
                                         assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by Koos until that date which
                                         is 184 days from August 5, 2016 (“New Vesting Date”).



		(c)	In
                                         the event that Koos’ employment by the Company is terminated pursuant to Section
                                         6(a)(iv) or Section 6(a) (v) of the Employment Agreement both of the Compensation Common
                                         Shares and the Compensation Preferred Stock shall be returned by Koos to the Company.



This
instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior agreements
of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. It may be changed only by an agreement in writing signed by a party
against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, extension or discharge is sought.


The
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State or California.
Any action to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in the state courts located in San Diego County, State of California.


 


IN
WHITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	Company	Koos
	By:/s/David
    R. Koos	By:/s/
    David R. Koos
	It’s:Chairman
    and CEO	 
	August
    5, 2016	August
    5, 2016
# C_2021079EN.01000502.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2021 — European Commission v Printeos SA

(Case C-301/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Decision finding infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Fines - Annulment - Repayment of the principal amount of the fine - Article 266 TFEU - Default interest - Distinction between default interest and compensatory interest - Calculation of interest - Article 90(4)(a), second sentence, of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012)

(2021/C 79/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac, P. Rossi and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Printeos SA (represented by: H. Brokelmann and P. Martínez-Lage Sobredo, abogados)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Sets aside point 2 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 February 2019, Printeos v Commission (T-201/17, EU:T:2019:81); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets aside point 2 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 February 2019, Printeos v Commission (T-201/17, EU:T:2019:81);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay Printeos SA interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its principal refinancing operations, plus 3,5 percentage points, on the amount of EUR 184 592,95 for the period from 31 March 2017 until the date of payment in full; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay Printeos SA interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for its principal refinancing operations, plus 3,5 percentage points, on the amount of EUR 184 592,95 for the period from 31 March 2017 until the date of payment in full;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and pay those of Printeos SA relating both to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-201/17 and the proceedings before the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and pay those of Printeos SA relating both to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-201/17 and the proceedings before the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-48-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 164; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Vallourec Star, LP; (Semi-Finished Steel Casing); Muskogee, 
Oklahoma

    On August 11, 2023, Vallourec Star, LP submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
Subzone 164A, in Muskogee, Oklahoma.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 56589, August 18, 2023). On 
December 11, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: December 11, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27481 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00092

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

BARBARA MOTT BORDELO N,

RELATOR §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Barbara Mott Bordelon filed an original proceeding in which she challenged the denial of her motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. 1 On April 30, 2019, this Court conditionally granted Bordelon’s petition and directed Respondent to vacate his February 9, 2019, order denying Bordelon’s motion to dismiss, and in its stead, to issue an order granting Bordelon’s motion and dismissing Lois Hale’s lawsuit against Bordelon, without prejudice. By an order signed on May 1, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot.
Accordi ngly, we dismiss Bordelon’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot

. O pinion delivered May 8, 2019. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

1 Respondent is the Honorable Paul E. White, Judge of the 159th District Court in Angelina County, Texas. Lois Hale is the Real Party in Interest

.

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT

MAY 8 , 2019

NO. 12

- 19

- 00092

- CV

BARBARA MOTT BORDELO N, Relator V.

HON. PAUL E. WHITE , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Barbara Mott Bordelon; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12

- 19

- 00092

- CV and the
defendant in trial court cause number CV

- 02421

- 13

- 06 , pending on the docket of the 159th Jud icial District Court of Angelina County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed
herein on March 12, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of
this Court that the writ should not issue , it is therefor e CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as
moot

. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.