alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.3

                        ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST

BY THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ("Assignment") made and entered into
as of the 29th day of December 2000, AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT L.C., a Texas Limited
Liability Company.,("Assignor"), and 1st Realty Investments, Inc., a Nevada For
Profit Corporation, ("Assignee"), agree as follows:

         1. Assignment. For the amount of $876,332.00 evidenced by a note for
that amount from Assignee in favor of Assignor, together with other necessary
and agreed upon consideration as set forth below, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby irrevocably sells, transfers and
assigns to Assignee all of its membership interest and participation percentage
in Laguna Investments L.L.C. Assignee hereby accepts the assignment and transfer
of the Assignors' membership interest in Laguna Investments L.L.C., and agrees
to assume any and all obligations and responsibilities associated with such
interest from and after the date of this Assignment and hold Assignors harmless
from any and all liabilities relating thereto.

         2. Further Acts: Additional Documents. Assignors and Assignee shall
perform all such further acts and execute and deliver any and all additional
documents and instruments that may be necessary or desirable to consummate,
evidence or confirm the assignment of the interest described herein.

         3. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Assignment has been executed as of the day and
year first above written.

                                        "ASSIGNORS"

                                        AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT, L.C. a Texas
                                        limited liability company


                                        /s/   Edward W. Dietrich
                                              ------------------
                                        Name  Edward W. Dietrich
                                              ------------------
                                        Title Vice President
                                              --------------

                                        "ASSIGNEE"

                                        1st Realty Investments, Inc. a Nevada
                                        For Profit Corporation

                                        /s/   William Szilagyi
                                              ------------------
                                        Name  William Szilagyi
                                              ------------------
                                        Title President
                                              ---------
#### Odeh v. Odeh

23622

07/24/2002

Affirmed
United States Department of Agriculture 

 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Significant Pest Bulletin 

Lygodium microphyllum 

Lygodium flexuosum 

Effective immediately, Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) has issued a Federal Import Quarantine Order 

(May 30, 2008) to prevent the importation of Lygodium microphyllum (Old World Climbing Fern) and Lygodium 

flexuosum (Maidenhair Creeper). The restrictions apply to any parts capable of propagation, including spores 

and leaves (fronds) of these climbing fern species. 

Prohibited Plant Species 

Lygodium microphyllum 

Version 1.1 Updated: 06/05/2008 All previous versions are obsolete.

Lygodium flexuosum 

Damage 

These climbing ferns spread prolifically, scrambling 

over vegetation, creating a fire hazard, smothering 

native plant communities and causing other harmful 

environmental and economic impacts. 

Affected Commodities and 

Port Inspections 

Cut Flowers should be carefully inspected as 

recently APHIS learned of commercial interest in 

importing Lygodium microphyllum as cut flower 

greenery. The Cut Flower and Greenery Manual

has been updated to add a Table for these ferns 

under Polypodiophyta. These ferns have also been 

added to the List of Regulated Propagative Material 

in the Nursery Stock Restrictions. 

Figure 1 

Fertile and 

sterile fronds 

1

Distribution 

Lygodium microphyllum is native to south east Asia 

and Australia and also occurs in Florida, where it is 

a State noxious weed, subject to control. 

2

Figure 2 

Fertile fronds 

with sporangia 

4

Lygodium flexuosum, a weed of rice, plantation 

crops and natural lowland vegetation in eastern 

Asia and Australia, is not known to occur in the 

United States. 

3 5

Figure 3 

Environment 

infested with 

Lygodium 

microphyllum
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THIRTEEN AND
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                         291,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  226,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,967)
<INVENTORY>                                    680,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,219,205
<PP&E>                                         319,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                (121,248)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,427,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          855,153
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           925
<OTHER-SE>                                     456,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,427,063
<SALES>                                      2,648,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,648,537
<CGS>                                        2,258,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,258,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               294,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
5/17/19; Last reviewed/formatted May 2023 Page 1 of 1

Potato Cyst Nematode Guidelines Amended to Facilitate Research and Field Trials

Effective May 17, 2019, The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service (APHIS) and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) amended the “Canada and 

United States Guidelines on Surveillance and Phytosanitary Actions for the Potato Cyst 

Nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida” (Guidelines). The amendment 

enhances the ability of industry to conduct research while maintaining appropriate 

safeguarding measures. 

Therefore, APHIS and CFIA have, at the request of and in consultation with their stakeholders, 

updated Section 8 of the Guidelines to facilitate field trials (e.g., post-harvest testing, variety 

evaluations) or other research on potato cyst nematodes (PCN) and to refine the requirements 

for the movement of small lots of seed potatoes between the United States and Canada with 

the following amendment: 

Current text—Section 8, Paragraph 5 (to be removed):

“Shipments of seed potato samples consisting of 500 tubers or less for trials or research 

purposes are exempt from these requirements, provided the field has been previously surveyed 

and found negative for PCN.” 

Amended text—To be added to Section 8 as “8.1” at the end of Section 8, after current 

Paragraph 9

8.1.0 Seed potato samples for trials or research purposes 

Shipments of any class of certified seed potato samples consisting of 500 tubers or less for trials 

(e.g., post-harvest testing, variety evaluations) or research purposes are exempt from these 

requirements. The seed potato tuber samples must be harvested from an area not regulated 

for PCN. Both a phytosanitary certificate and a separate declaration stating the purpose for 

which the seed is being imported are required. The shipments of seed potato samples must be 

accompanied by both: 

1. A phytosanitary certificate with the following additional declaration: “These certified seed potatoes were 

harvested from an area not regulated for potato cyst nematodes (Globodera rostochiensis and/or 

Globodera pallida).”

2. A signed declaration from the grower, shipper, processor, dealer or importer, on official letterhead, 

stating: 

"The certified seed potatoes in this shipment are for trials or research purposes, are not for sale, will 

not be used for increase purposes, and are limited in quantity to 500 tubers or less per lot.” 

For the Golden Nematode website: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/gn

For the Pale Cyst Nematode website: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/pcn

For more information about APHIS’ Globodera spp. programs contact Lynn Evans-Goldner, 

National Policy Manager at lynn.evans-goldner@usda.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the year ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Edd
Helms, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the company.

Date: September 15, 2008       /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      ------------------       ----------------------
                               W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief
                                Executive Officer

         September 15, 2008       /s/  Dean A. Goodson
      ------------------       --------------------
                               Dean A. Goodson, Chief Financial Officer

         September 15, 2008       /s/  L. Wade Helms
      ------------------       ------------------
                               L. Wade Helms, Executive Vice President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5291-H5292]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. CONYERS:
        H.R. 6189.

[[Page H5292]]

       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51172 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JON PHILLIP RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-28-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Jon Phillip Ramos on appeal from the revocation of his term of supervised release has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as is required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramos has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excusedNo. 05-51172 -2- from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
# C_2020255EN.01000702.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 — Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos v European Commission

(Case C-309/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 73(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Order of the General Court finding an action manifestly inadmissible for lack of a handwritten signature - Paper version of the application including a printed authenticated electronic signature)

(2020/C 255/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos (represented by: J. Azcárate Olano and E. Almarza Nantes, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.

---
# C_2020287EN.01001102.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — VQ v Land Hessen

(Case C-272/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Scope - Article 2(2)(a) - Meaning of ‘activity which falls outside the scope of Union law’ - Article 4(7) - Concept of ‘controller’ - Petitions Committee of the parliament of a Federated State of a Member State - Article 15 - Right of access by the data subject)

(2020/C 287/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VQ

Defendant: Land Hessen

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) must be interpreted as meaning that, in so far as a Petitions Committee of the parliament of a Federated State of a Member State determines, alone or with others, the purposes and means of the processing of personal data, that committee must be categorised as a ‘controller’, within the meaning of that provision, and consequently the processing of personal data carried out by that committee falls within the scope of that regulation and, in particular, of Article 15 thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
# C_2008037EN.01002502.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/25

---

Action brought on 29 November 2007 — New Look v OHIM (NEW LOOK)

(Case T-435/07)

(2008/C 37/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: New Look Ltd (Weymouth, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and M. Blair and K. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 3 September 2007 in Case R 670/2007-2 shall be annulled. |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 3 September 2007 in Case R 670/2007-2 shall be annulled.

| — | The Office shall bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Office shall bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘NEW LOOK’ for goods and services in classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 25, 26 and 35 — application No 2 932 606

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(3) of Council Regulation No 40/94, as the Board of Appeal i) erred in requiring the applicant to demonstrate acquired distinctive character in a Member State other than the United Kingdom and Ireland; ii) erred in holding that the applicant's evidence of use of ‘NEW LOOK’ in stylised form or together with a distinctive device was incapable of imbuing the mark with distinctive character; and iii) failed to place sufficient overall weight on the applicant's evidence of use in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Pleas in law:

---
20161221 8K Exhibit 101



		

			 

		


		

			 

		




		
			AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
		

		
			SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made as of the 21st day of December, 2016, by and between JUDITH A. HUNSICKER (“Executive”) and EMBASSY BANK FOR THE LEHIGH VALLEY, a Pennsylvania banking institution having its principal office in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (the “Bank”).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			WITNESSETH
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated December 23, 2015 (as the same may be amended from time to time, the “SERP”); and
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive desire to amend the SERP to increase the amount of the benefit thereunder.  
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:
		

		
			1.Paragraph 1(b) of the SERP is hereby amended to provide that the Normal Retirement Supplemental Pension (as defined in the SERP) shall be $24,385. 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2.In all other respects, the SERP, as amended above, is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Bank and the Executive.  All other provisions of the SERP shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby. 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, each intending to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment as of the date, month and year first above written.
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
						 

					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						ATTEST:

					
					
						 

					
					
						EMBASSY BANK FOR THE LEHIGH VALLEY

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						/s/ Diane M. Cunningham

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ David M. Lobach, Jr.

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						WITNESS:

					
					
						 

					
					
						EXECUTIVE

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						/s/ Lynne M. Neel

					
					
						 

					
					
						/s/ Judith A. Hunsicker

				



		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5482]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNIZING GROSSENBURG IMPLEMENT

 Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, today I wish to recognize the 75th 
anniversary of Grossenburg Implement. The company was founded during 
the Great Depression in 1937 by Charles Jacob Grossenburg in Tripp 
County, SD. The demand for two-cylinder tractors during World War II 
led to the company's success and prosperity. Since then, Grossenburg 
Implement has stayed true to their mission statement ``to provide the 
best product at a reasonable price and with the highest level of 
service.'' Along with products from John Deere, Grossenburg sold 
Oldsmobile and Cadillac automobiles. Throughout the years, the 
Grossenburg family remained dedicated to quality service and continued 
success.
  Charlie, son of Barry and Marilyn Grossenburg, represents the fourth 
generation of the family business and is now the vice president. In 
1998, Grossenburg Implement continued its success by adding a combine 
shop in Winner and subsequently an overhead crane to the shop in 2005. 
In 2009, the company also celebrated the opening of another combine 
shop in Pierre. Most recently in 2012, the company expanded their 
business by purchasing Northeast Equipment, Inc. in Nebraska. Today, 
the company has grown from one store to a projected $150 million 
company.
  I would like to congratulate the Grossenburg family and the employees 
of Grossenburg Implement for 75 years of success and wish them a 
prosperous future.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2019213EN.01008302.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/83

---

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2019 — XK v Commission

(Case T-543/18) (1)

(2019/C 213/80)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
25753

#### State v. Young

Vacated and Remanded
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated
December 15, 2008, with respect to the 2008 consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, in the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-84402 and 333-42245) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-95282, 333-3438,
333-26135, 333-44281, 333-50679, 333-76991, 333-33944, 333-56800, 333-84404, 333-101378, 333-115494, 333-144006 and 333-148184).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON, LLP



|                    
|--------------------
|San Jose, California
|December 15, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0054 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS CURRAN

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 8 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 2 2024

04/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0054