alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 30, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Alliance for OpenUSD Series LLC (“AOUSD”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose                           ( print page 86940)                        of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Alliance for OpenUSD Series LLC, series of Joint Development Foundation Projects, LLC, Dover, DE. The nature and scope of AOUSD's standards development activities are: standardizing, developing, and evolving Universal Scene Description (USD) in an open forum to promote interoperability of 3D content to empower creators and consumers worldwide. AOUSD will initially focus on standardizing essential features of USD (including technical details or requirements on composition model, file format, data model, and schema) that are stable, understood, implemented and important for 3D authoring and transmission. In the future, AOUSD may also develop additional standards specifications to promote interoperability of 3D content through USD. AOUSD will also develop educational, marketing, and informational materials to facilitate the understanding and adoption of its standards.

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27580 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Hirano v. Mabellos

17179

11/17/94

Vacated and Remanded
Sugarcane Diseases Quarantined Areas

7 C.F.R. § 301.87-3 

Last updated: December 29, 2022 

a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Deputy Administrator shall list as 

a regulated area in paragraph (c) of this section, each quarantined State, or each portion thereof, in 

which a sugarcane disease has been found by an inspector or in which the Deputy Administrator has 

reason to believe that a sugarcane disease is present, or each portion of a quarantined State which the 

Deputy Administrator deems necessary to regulate because of its proximity to a sugarcane disease or 

its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from localities in which a sugarcane disease 

occurs. Less than an entire quarantined State will be designated as a regulated area only if the 

Deputy Administrator is of the opinion that: 

1. The State has adopted and is enforcing a quarantine or regulation which imposes restrictions 

on the intrastate movement of the regulated articles which are substantially the same as those 

which are imposed with respect to the interstate movement of such articles under this 

subpart; and 

2. The designation of less than the entire State as a regulated area will otherwise be adequate to 

3. prevent the artificial interstate spread of a sugarcane disease. 

b) The Deputy Administrator or an inspector may temporarily designate any nonregulated area in a 

quarantined State as a regulated area in accordance with the criteria specified in paragraph (a) of this 

section for listing such an area. Written notice of the designation shall be given to the owner or 

person in possession of the nonregulated area and, thereafter, the interstate movement of any 

regulated article from the area shall be subject to the applicable provisions of this subpart. As soon 

as practicable, the area shall be added to the list in paragraph (c) of this section or the designation 

shall be terminated by the Deputy Administrator or an inspector, and notice thereof shall be given to 

the owner or person in possession of the area. 

c) The areas described below are designated as regulated areas; 

Hawaii 

All of Hawaii. 

Puerto Rico. 

All of Puerto Rico.
Aug. 13, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11842 ProFly Drones DJI Spreading Wings S1000 

This is a request for an amendment to Exemption No. 11842 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–

1148, granted to ProFly Drones. This amendment will provide for the addition of the DJI 

Spreading Wings S1000 multirotor sUAS aircraft to the inventory of approved aircraft for use 

during VLOS operations currently covered under Exemption 11842. 

These airframes are commercially available to the general public, as are all components used to 

complete them. In addition, all configurations of these components follow standard, wellestablished practices. No aspect of these aircraft is proprietary to ProFly Drones in design or 

manufacture. 

DJI Innovations Model Spreading Wings S1000

S1000_Plus_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf (Uploaded to Docket)
#### The Ohio Power Co., Appellee, *v.*Deist, Appellant. 

(No. 32116

Decided April 19, 1950.)

*585*Messrs. Mercer & Abel, Messrs. Meyer, Johnson & Kincaid, Messrs. Pomerene, Burns & Milligan*and *Messrs. Bay, Cope, Ketterer, Raley & Wright,*for appellee.

*Mr. Hayward W. Strecker, Mr. Robert 8. Christie, Messrs. O’Neill, O’Neill é Sauer*and *Mr. Hugh M. Bennett,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed ior the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Wbygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Stewart, Turner and Tapt, JJ., concur.
#### John J. Schantz, Respondent, v Marilyn H. Schantz, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In the circumstances of this case, the trial court’s distribution of the parties’ marital assets was not inequitable nor an abuse of discretion *(see, Arvantides v Arvantides,*64 NY2d 1033).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — Divorce.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
895 P.2d 172

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### AIG Hawai‘i Ins. Co., Inc. v. Smith

15297

4/11/95

Denied

891 P.2d 261
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.11


[SYQUEST LOGO APPEARS HERE]             



                                 June 30, 1998

VIA FACSIMILE

CC Investments LDC

             RE:  EXERCISE OF WARRANTS/ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK
                  ---------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

        This letter confirms that SyQuest Technology, Inc. ("SyQuest") and CC 
Investments LDC ("Warrant Holder") agree as follows:

1.      Warrant Holder will exercise 1,000,000 shares of Warrant No. 81A it 
received in connection with its purchase of the Company's Convertible Preferred 
Stock, Series 5 at $3.0469 per share to acquire 1,000,000 shares of the 
Company's common stock, for total proceeds of $3,046,900 (the "Proceeds").

2.      Upon receipt of the Proceeds, plus an additional $204.69 representing
the par value for an additional 2,046,900 shares (the "Additional Common
Shares") of the Company's common stock, the Company will issue a total of
3,046,900 shares of common stock to Warrant Holder.

3.      The Additional Common Shares shall have piggy-back registration rights 
so that they will be registered in a future registration statement consistent 
with existing Company contractual obligations regarding registrations, provided 
however that the Company agrees to register such shares no later than September 
25, 1998, subject to delays caused by reasonable business considerations.

4.      The Proceeds plus the additional $204.69 will be wire-transferred to the
following account: Bank of America, 1850 Gateway Blvd., 4th Floor, Concord, CA 
94520, ABA # 121-000-358, Account # 12334-56287.

5.      The Company will deliver the shares of common stock issued upon exercise
of the warrant in accordance with the terms of the warrants, and it will direct 
its transfer agent to deliver such shares electronically without a restrictive 
legend provided that Warrant Holder complies with the applicable prospectus 
delivery requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and provides notice to 
the Company using the attached form.

        


<PAGE>
 
        The Company further acknowledges that Warrant Holder is relying on 
information disclosed in the Company's public filings with the SEC and confirms 
that it is aware of no material misstatements or omissions in those filings.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED


SyQuest Technology, Inc.                   CC Investments LDC



/s/ THOMAS C. TOKOS                        /s/ (illegible)
-------------------------                  ---------------------------
Thomas C. Tokos                            Authorized representative
Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
#### Billy Joe PEARCE, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12602.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 1, 1958.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1958.

*1054M. M. Baucum, Duncan, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence of the District Court of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, wherein the defendant, after being charged by information with the crime of burglary in the second degree after former conviction of a felony and tried by a jury, was convicted and his sentence fixed at twenty years in the state penitentiary.

To this appeal, the Attorney General has filed his Motion to Dismiss alleging: (1) The casemade was not filed within the time allowed by the trial court or a valid extension thereof; and (2) The defendant has forfeited his right to appeal from said judgment and sentence for the reason that subsequent to the imposition of judgment and sentence herein and prior to this date, the defendant escaped from custody and fled from the jurisdiction of this Court.

 An examination of the record reveals that judgment and sentence were imposed on November 8, 1957, at which time defendant was given sixty days in which to make and serve casemade. This time expired on January 7, 1958, and no further extension of time was granted until January 9, 1958, two days out of time. Under the previous decisions of this Court, where a casemade for appeal is not served within the time allowed originally by the trial court for serving casemade nor within the time fixed by any valid extension of time, the same is a nullity. Leach v. State, 95 Okl.Cr. 237, 246 P.2d 416. The time originally granted for serving the casemade having expired on January 7, 1958, the order of January 9, 1958, extending the time was a nullity. Brown v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 389, 208 P.2d 1143.

On the Attorney General’s second proposition, the Court finds that while being held in the County Jail of Johnston County, the defendant on January 25, 1958, escaped therefrom and fled from the jurisdiction of this Court, being recaptured on February 11, 1958, at Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Such situation is governed by the rule announced in Sanford v. State, 75 Okl.Cr. 362, 131 P.2d 770, syllabus 1:

> “Where a person is convicted of crime, and sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment, and perfects an appeal to this court, it is essential, that he should be in custody pending his appeal, by being confined in the county jail or state penitentiary, as may be provided by law, or constructively in custody by being admitted to bail; otherwise he waives his right of having his conviction reviewed by this court.”

> The motion to dismiss is sustained.

POWELL and NIX, JJ., concur.
# C_2019246EN.01002501.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/25

---

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2019 — Phreneos and Others v Commission

(Case T-715/18) (1)

(Public supply contracts - Tender procedure - Planning, preparation, promotion and implementation of the event ‘European Development Days’ - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to another tenderer - Annulment of the procurement procedure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 246/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Phrenos SPRL (Mont-sur-Marchienne, Belgium), Akkanto, (Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium), Operational Management Solutions (Chaumont Gistoux, Belgium) (represented by: R. Jafferali and R. van Melsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu, J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 27 November 2018 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium formed by the applicants in the call for tenders EuropeAid/139729/DH/SER/BE relating to the planning, preparation, promotion and implementation of the ‘European Development Days’ event for its Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development, and awarding that contract to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings, with the exception of those relating to the application by Pomilio Blumm Srl for leave to intervene in the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings, with the exception of those relating to the application by Pomilio Blumm Srl for leave to intervene in the interlocutory proceedings.

| 3. | Phrenos SPRL, Akkanto, Operational Management Solutions, the Commission and Pomilio Blumm shall bear their own costs relating to the application by Pomilio Blumm Srl for leave to intervene in the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Phrenos SPRL, Akkanto, Operational Management Solutions, the Commission and Pomilio Blumm shall bear their own costs relating to the application by Pomilio Blumm Srl for leave to intervene in the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
Order entered January 2, 2013

In The 

### Court of Rppeato fifth rii5tritt of TECexa at atfa55 )1 1 .4 No. 05-12-01084-CR ANDRE DJUNA HUBERT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-60671-M



### ORDER We GRANT Official Court Reporter Belinda G. Baraka's December 22, 2012 request for an extension of time to file the reporter's record. The reporter's record shall be due on or before January 31, 2013. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40215 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ROGELIO BAZAN GARZA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-418-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rogelio Bazan Garza was convicted ofone charge oftransporting an illegal alien within the United States, and the district court sentenced him to serve 37 months in prison and a two-year term of supervised release. Bazan Garza appeals his sentence. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable because it is the result of an erroneous balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Specifically, he contends that the district court failed togive sufficient mitigating weight to his history of mental illness and improperly relied on this factor to United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 6, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40215

2 support its chosen term of imprisonment, which was contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a). Bazan Garza also challenges this court’s application of a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness to a sentence that falls within the defendant’s guidelines range. Our review of the record shows no clear error in connection with the district court’s exercise of its broad sentencing discretion. See United States v. Nikonova, 480 F.3d 371, 376 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 163 (2007). Bazan Garza’s § 3582 argument is likewise nonpersuasive, as the record reflects that the district court gave proper weight to Bazan Garza’s need for treatment. See United Statesv. Giddings, 37 F.3d 1091, 1096 & n.17 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Lara-Velasquez, 919 F.2d 946, 956 n.13 (5th Cir. 1990). Bazan Garza’s challenge to the presumption ofreasonableness is unavailing. SeeRita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Bazan Garza has failed to show error in connection with his sentence. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
22228

#### Mayer v. Board of Dental Examiners

Affirmed
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3633

___________________________

Michael L. Burrage, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: September 4, 2015

Filed: September 10, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Michael L. Burrage, Jr. appeals the district court’s order affirming the

1

Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security

income after his hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). For reversal,

Burrage argues that the ALJ erred in determining his residual functional capacity by

improperly analyzing the medical evidence--specifically, relying on the opinion of a

non-examining consultant rather than his treating doctors, disregarding evidence that

there was no substance abuse, and failing to obtain additional evidence regarding his

limitations--and by discounting his testimony and that of his lay witnesses without

giving sufficiently specific reasons. Following careful review of the parties’

submissions and the record before us, we conclude that substantial evidence in the

record as a whole supports the ALJ’s finding. See Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1086,

1091, 1093 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States DistrictJudge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Noelle Collins, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Missouri.

-2-
ھ وجتلابق

سفندگون حباصا

و بز! 

لیتفعای ابرکھ یی ھابزو ھا سفندگوکثر ا ا جھابجیارجتیاھ

پلاکید باند شومی د. ناشبھتداشی رپکاساری میبیمرسی اھ

ید ابشما گلھ اسکرپی، رسمی گوش ھایپلاکخرید برای ه رشما

یی اسشنا گلھ شتھ اد .شدبا ید با نآ ا ر م ھنگا شرسفا ن داد ھاپلاک بھ 

کت شر ه ندزسا پلاک ئھ ارا .کنید لطفا با هرشما Tag-USDA1-866- 

 (866-873-2824) س تما ید بگیر تا درخواست را گلھ شناسایی شماره 

کنید یا سفارش پلاک را برای اولین بار ثبت کنید. برای آگاھی از بھ 

روزترین اطلاعات پلاک اسکرپی، اینجا را اسکن کنید. 

ً

آیا در برنامھ 

سفندگوییساناش

و زب ازھت ؟ھستیدرکا

متحدهایالاتزیشاوروزارت ک (USDA(

تا 100 کی شناسایی گلھستیرد پلاک پلامو

رایگانصورتبھرا کتشربھ یرابھکیاندگننک

رد کدواھخھارائدننکیمترکشاربنیاول 

انزما(ت بودجھ).اتمام

تولیدکنندگان رسمی پلاک اسکرپی مورد تأیید وزارت کشاورزی ایالات متحده 

AllFlex USA, Inc.

تلفن: SCRAPIE833-) 833-727-2743(

ر:ابمن 972-338-3445

scrapiefullaf@merck.com :ایمیل

www.allflex.global/na/product/scrapie-tags/ :آنلاین

فاقد اسکرپی برنامھ گواھی گلھ عادی و 

فاقد اسکرپی (و SFCP (

•

• دیویی (انس رافرک شناسھ RFID(

• لاستیکی گوش در چند رنگ پلاکھای پ

 

Premier 1 Supplies, LLC

تلفن: 800-282-6631 

ر:ابمن 800-346-7992 

info@premier1supplies.com :ایمیل

www.premier1supplies.com آن:لاین

• پلاکھای پلاستیکی برنامھ گواھی گلھ عادی

• لاکھای پلاستیکی گوش در چند رنگ پ

yompanag CTand & tional BNa

تلفن: 859-261-2035

ر:ابمن 859-261-8247

tags@nationalband.com :ایمیل

www.nationalband.com/ :آنلاین

• فلزی گوش در چند رنگھای پلاک

Shearwell North America, Inc.

تلفن: 800-778-6014

SalesUSA@shearwell.com :ایمیل

www.shearwell.com :آنلاین

• لاکھای پلاستیکی معمولی و برنامھ گواھی گلھ عادی و فاقد اسکرپی پ

RFID • 

• لاکھای پلاستیکی گوش در چند رنگ پ

زن را باید با ھزینھ شخصی خریداری کنیدھای پلاکھای ھر شرکت متفاوت است. دستگاھنصب پلاک برای پلاک

شده از سوی ھای ارائھآنھا در پلاک USDA اند. گنجانده نشدھ

 USDA تاسان گمھرای برراببترصفابدهندھوامو ارمارفکده، ندھھارائک ی ر بامتپسدر دهادرشص. 2023 | -23-033APHIS
Exhibit 32.1



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Marty E.
Adams     
|Marty E. Adams         
|Chairman, President and
|Chief Executive Officer
|February 23,
2006      



The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.