<Page>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

   X     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
-------  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002

                                       OR

         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
-------  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         Commission File Number 0-24652

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          ----------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         DELAWARE                                        13-3533987
--------------------------------               --------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                       (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                       Identification No.)

625 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK                    10022
--------------------------------------            ---------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)               (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (212) 421-5333

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

     Title of Class
     Beneficial Assignment Certificates and Limited Partnership Interests

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X  No
                                             ---     ---

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     None

<Page>

                      CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF
                         THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF
              THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

WHEN USED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, THE WORDS "BELIEVES,"
"ANTICIPATES," "EXPECTS" AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. STATEMENTS LOOKING FORWARD IN TIME ARE INCLUDED IN
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K PURSUANT TO THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISION OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO
CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES WHICH COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER
MATERIALLY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE SET FORTH IN "MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS."
READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS, WHICH SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE HEREOF.


                                      -2-
<Page>

                                     PART I

Item 1.  Business.

GENERAL

Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership which
was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on August 28, 1989. The
General Partners of the Partnership are Related Freedom Associates L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (the "Related General Partner"), and Freedom GP
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Freedom General Partner" and together with
the Related General Partner, the "General Partners"). The general partner of the
Related General Partner is Related Freedom Associates Inc., a Delaware
corporation. The General Partners are both affiliates of Related Capital
Company. On November 25, 1997, an affiliate of the Related General Partner
purchased 100% of the stock of the Freedom General Partner.

On February 9, 1990, the Partnership commenced a public offering (the
"Offering") of Beneficial Assignment Certificates ("BACs") representing
assignments of limited partnership interests in the Partnership ("Limited
Partnership Interests"), pursuant to a prospectus dated February 9, 1990, as
supplemented by supplements thereto dated December 7, 1990, May 10, 1991, July
10, 1991 and July 23, 1991 (as so supplemented, the "Prospectus").

The Partnership received $72,896,000 of the gross proceeds of the Offering from
4,780 investors, and the Offering was terminated on August 8, 1991. (See Item 8,
"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.)

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES

The Partnership was formed to invest as a limited partner in other limited
partnerships ("Local Partnerships"), each of which owns one or more leveraged
low-income multi-family residential complexes ("Apartment Complexes" or
"Properties") that are eligible for the low-income housing tax credit ("Housing
Tax Credit") enacted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, and some of which may also
be eligible for the historic rehabilitation tax credit ("Historic Tax Credit";
together with Housing Tax Credits, the "Tax Credits"). The Partnership's
investment in each Local Partnership represents 98% to 99% of the partnership
interests in the Local Partnership. As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had
acquired interests in forty-two Local Partnerships. As of March 31, 2002,
approximately $58,000,000 of net proceeds had been invested in such Local
Partnerships, representing all of the Partnership's net proceeds available for
investment. Subsequent to March 31, 2002 and as of the date of this filing,
there have been no additional investments, nor are any other investments
expected. See Item 2, "Properties," below.

The investment objectives of the Partnership are described below.

1. Entitle qualified BACs holders to Housing Tax Credits over the Credit Period
(as defined below) with respect to each Apartment Complex.

2.  Preserve and protect the Partnership's capital.

3. Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Properties and
provide distributions of sale or refinancing proceeds upon the disposition of
the Properties.

4. Allocate passive losses to individual BACs holders to offset passive income
that they may realize from rental real estate investments and other passive
activities, and allocate passive losses to corporate BACs holders to offset
business income.


                                      -3-
<Page>

One of the Partnership's objectives is to entitle qualified BACs holders to
Housing Tax Credits over the period of the Partnership's entitlement to claim
Tax Credits (for each Property, generally ten years from the date of investment
or, if later, the date the Property is leased to qualified tenants; referred to
herein as the "Credit Period"). Each of the Local Partnerships in which the
Partnership has an interest has been allocated by the relevant state credit
agency the authority to recognize Housing Tax Credits during the Credit Period,
provided that the Local Partnership satisfies the rent restriction, minimum
set-aside and other requirements for recognition of the Housing Tax Credits at
all times during such period. Once a Local Partnership has become eligible to
recognize Housing Tax Credits, it may lose such eligibility and suffer an event
of "recapture" if its Property fails to remain in compliance with the Housing
Tax Credit requirements. None of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership
has acquired an interest has suffered an event of recapture.

Housing Tax Credits with respect to a given Apartment Complex are available for
a ten-year period that commences when the property is leased to qualified
tenants. However, the annual Housing Tax Credits available in the year in which
the Apartment Complex is leased to qualified tenants must be prorated based upon
the months remaining in the year. The amount of the annual Housing Tax Credits
not available in the first year will be available in the eleventh year. Internal
Revenue Code Section 42 regulates the use of the Apartment Complexes as to
occupancy, eligibility, and unit gross rent, among other requirements. Each
Apartment Complex must meet the provisions of these regulations during each of
fifteen consecutive years in order to remain qualified to receive the credits.
Certain Apartment Complexes have extended compliance periods of up to fifty
years.

The Partnership continues to meet its primary objective of generating Housing
Tax Credits. However, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will
continue to achieve any or all of its investment objectives.

The Partnership also continues to meet its objective of allocating passive
losses to individual BACs holders to offset passive income that they may realize
from rental real estate investments and other passive activities, and allocating
passive losses to corporate BACs holders to offset business income.

As of March 31, 2002, cash distributions received from the Local Partnerships
have been relatively immaterial. Management expects that the distributions
received from the Local Partnerships will increase, although not to a level
sufficient to permit cash distributions to BACs holders. The Partnership does
not anticipate providing cash distributions to BACs holders in circumstances
other than refinancings or sales.

SEGMENTS

The Partnership operates in one segment, which is the investment in multi-family
residential property.

COMPETITION

The real estate business is highly competitive and substantially all of the
properties acquired are subject to active competition from similar properties in
their respective vicinities. In addition, various other limited partnerships
may, in the future, be formed by the General Partners and/or their affiliates to
engage in businesses which may compete with the Partnership.

EMPLOYEES

The Partnership does not have any direct employees. All services are performed
for the Partnership by its General Partners and their affiliates. The General
Partners receive compensation in connection with such activities as set forth in
Items 11 and 13. In addition, the Partnership reimburses the General Partners
and certain of their affiliates for expenses incurred in connection with the
performance by their employees of services for the Partnership in accordance


                                      -4-
<Page>

with the Partnership's Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement").

Item 2.  Properties.

The Partnership holds a 99%, 98.99% and 98% limited partnership interest in
nine, ten and twenty-three Local Partnerships, respectively. Set forth below is
a schedule of these Local Partnerships including certain information concerning
the Apartment Complexes (the "Local Partnership Schedule"). Further information
concerning these Local Partnerships and their Properties, including any
encumbrances affecting the Properties, may be found in Item 14 (a) 2; Schedule
III.

<Table>
<Caption>
                           LOCAL PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE
                                                                                  % OF UNITS OCCUPIED  AT  MAY 1,
NAME AND LOCATION                                                            -----------------------------------------
(NUMBER OF UNITS)                       DATE ACQUIRED                  2002         2001          2000         1999         1998
-----------------                       -------------                  ----         ----          ----         ----         ----
<S>                                     <C>                            <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Parkside Townhomes
York, PA (53)                           September 1990                  87%          94%           98%         100%           98%

Twin Trees
Layton, UT (43)                         October 1990                    98%         100%           98%         100%           93%

Bennion (Mulberry)
Taylorsville, UT (80)                   October 1990                    96%          94%           90%          98%           99%

Hunters Chase
Madison, AL (91)                        October 1990                    93%          95%           89%          95%           94%

Wilshire Park
Huntsville, AL (65)                     October 1990                    94%          95%           94%          89%           95%

Bethel Park
Bethel, OH (84)                         October 1990                    80%          86%           95%          88%           86%

Zebulon Park
Owensville, OH (66)                     October 1990                    95%          97%           96%          85%           89%

Tivoli Place
Murphreesboro, TN (61)                  October 1990                    89%          88%           95%          98%           98%

Northwood (Hartwood)
Jacksonville, FL (110)                  October 1990                   100%          95%           96%          97%          100%

Oxford Trace
Aiken, SC (29)                          October 1990                    79%          97%           93%          97%           90%

Ivanhoe Apts.
Salt Lake City, UT (19)                 January 1991                    95%          95%          100%         100%           89%

Washington Brooklyn
Brooklyn, NY (24)                       January 1991                   100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Manhattan B (C.H. Development)
</Table>


                                      -5-
<Page>

                           LOCAL PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE
                                   (CONTINUED)
<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                  % OF UNITS OCCUPIED  AT  MAY 1,
NAME AND LOCATION                                                            -----------------------------------------
(NUMBER OF UNITS)                       DATE ACQUIRED                  2002         2001          2000         1999         1998
-----------------                       -------------                  ----         ----          ----         ----         ----
<S>                                     <C>                            <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
New York, NY (35)                       January 1991                   100%          97%           94%          94%          100%

Davidson Court
Staten Island, NY (38)                  March 1991                     100%         100%           95%          97%           92%

Magnolia Mews
Philadelphia, PA (63)                   March 1991                     100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Oaks Village
Whiteville, NC (40)                     March 1991                     100%          98%           98%          93%          100%

Greenfield Village
Dunn, NC (40)                           March 1991                     100%          95%          100%         100%           98%

Morris Avenue (CLM Equities)
Bronx, NY (58)                          April 1991                     100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Victoria Manor
Riverside, CA (112)                     April 1991                     100%         100%           98%          94%           89%

Ogontz Hall
Philadelphia, PA (35)                   April 1991                      65%(a)      100%           84%          97%           94%

Eagle Ridge
Stoughton, WI (54)                      May 1991                        93%          96%           91%          96%           83%

Nelson Anderson
Bronx, NY (81)                          June 1991                       96%          98%           99%          97%           98%

Abraham Lincoln Apts.
Irondequoit, NY (69)                    September 1991                  94%          91%          100%          99%          100%

Wilson Street Apts. (Middletown)
Middletown, PA (44)                     September 1991                  95%          91%          100%          98%          100%

Lauderdale Lakes
Lauderdale Lakes, FL (172)              October 1991                    96%          95%           94%          94%           98%

Flipper Temple
Atlanta, GA (163)                       October 1991                   100%          96%           97%         100%          100%

220 Cooper Street
Camden, NJ (29)                         December 1991                   93%          97%          100%          70%          100%

Pecan Creek
Tulsa, OK (47)                          December 1991                   94%          98%           98%          91%          100%
</Table>


                                      -6-
<Page>

                           LOCAL PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE
                                   (CONTINUED)
<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                  % OF UNITS OCCUPIED  AT  MAY 1,
NAME AND LOCATION                                                            -----------------------------------------
(NUMBER OF UNITS)                       DATE ACQUIRED                  2002         2001          2000         1999         1998
-----------------                       -------------                  ----         ----          ----         ----         ----
<S>                                     <C>                            <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Vendome
Brooklyn, NY (24)                       December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Rainer Villas
New Augusta, MS (20)                    December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Pine Shadow Apts.
Waveland, MS (48)                       December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Windsor Place
Wedowee, AL (24)                        December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Brookwood Apts.
Foley, AL (38)                          December 1991                   98%          95%           97%         100%          100%

Heflin Hills Apts.
Heflin, AL (24)                         December 1991                  100%         100%           96%         100%          100%

Shadowood Apts.
Stevenson, AL (24)                      December 1991                  100%         100%           91%          96%           92%

Brittany Apts.
DeKalb, MS (25)                         December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Hidden Valley Apts.
Brewton, AL (40)                        December 1991                   99%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Westbrook Square
Carthage, MS (32)                       December 1991                   88%          88%           91%          91%           97%

Royal Pines Apts. (Warsaw Elderly)
Warsaw, KY (36)                         December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

West Hill Square
Gordo, AL (24)                          December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%          100%

Elmwood Manor
Picayune, MS (24)                       December 1991                  100%         100%          100%         100%           96%

Harmony Gate Apts.
Los Angeles, CA (70)                    March 1992                      97%          97%           96%          94%           97%
</Table>

(a)  Property undergoing renovations.

None of the Local Partnership's assets or revenue balances are greater than 10%
of the total assets or revenue balances.

All leases are generally for periods not greater than one to two years and no
tenant occupies more than 10% of the rentable square footage.


                                      -7-
<Page>

Commercial tenants (to which average rental per square foot applies) comprise
less than 5% of the rental revenues of the Local Partnerships. Rents for the
residential units are determined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development ("HUD") and reflect increases, if any, in consumer price
indices in various geographic areas.

Management of the General Partners periodically reviews the physical state of
the properties and suggests to the respective Local General Partners budget
improvements which are generally funded from cash flow from operations or
release of replacement reserve escrows.

Management of the General Partners periodically reviews the insurance coverage
of the Properties and believes such coverage is adequate.

See Item 1, Business, above for the general competitive conditions to which the
Properties described above are subject.

Real estate taxes are calculated using rates and assessed valuations determined
by the township or city in which the Property is located. Such taxes have
approximated 1% of the aggregate cost of the Properties as shown in Schedule III
to the financial statements included herein.

The General Partners generally required that the general partners of the Local
Partnerships ("Local General Partners") undertake an obligation to fund
operating deficits of the Local Partnership (up to a stated maximum amount)
during a limited period of time (typically three to five years) following the
achievement of break-even operations ("Operating Deficit Guarantees"). Under the
terms of the Operating Deficit Guarantees, amounts funded are treated as
operating loans which do not bear interest and which will be repaid only out of
50% of available cash flow or out of available net sale or refinancing proceeds.
As of March 31, 2002, all Operating Deficit Guarantees have expired and $319,638
of operating loans are outstanding. In cases where the General Partners deem it
appropriate, the obligations of a Local General Partner under the Operating
Deficit Guarantees have been secured by letters of credit and/or cash escrow
deposits.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

                                     PART II

Item 5.  Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Security Holder
Matters.

As of March 31, 2002, the Partnership had issued and has outstanding 72,896
Limited Partnership Interests, each representing a $1,000 capital contribution
to the Partnership, or an aggregate capital contribution of $72,896,000. All of
the issued and outstanding Limited Partnership Interests have been issued to
Freedom Assignor Inc. (the "Assignor Limited Partner"), which has in turn issued
72,896 BACs to the purchasers thereof for an aggregate purchase price of
$72,896,000. Each BAC represents all of the economic and virtually all of the
ownership rights attributable to a Limited Partnership Interest held by the
Assignor Limited Partner. BACs may be converted into Limited Partnership
Interests at no cost to the holder (other than the payment of transfer costs not
to exceed $100), but Limited Partnership Interests so acquired are not


                                      -8-
<Page>

thereafter convertible into BACs. As of May 7, 2002, the Partnership has 4,120
registered holders of an aggregate of 72,896 BACs.

Neither the BACs nor the Limited Partnership Interests are traded on any
established trading market. The Partnership does not intend to include the BACs
for quotation on NASDAQ or for listing on any national or regional stock
exchange or any other established securities market. The Revenue Act of 1987
contained provisions which have an adverse impact on investors in "publicly
traded partnerships." Accordingly, the General Partners have imposed
restrictions limiting the transferability of the BACs and the Limited
Partnership Interests in secondary market transactions. These restrictions
should prevent a public trading market from developing that would adversely
affect the ability of an investor to liquidate his or her investment quickly. It
is expected that such procedures will remain in effect until such time, if ever,
as further revision of the Revenue Act of 1987 may permit the Partnership to
lessen the scope of the restrictions.

All of the Partnership's general partnership interests, representing an
aggregate capital contribution of $2,000, are held by the two General Partners.

There are no material restrictions in the Partnership Agreement on the ability
of the Partnership to make distributions. The Partnership has made no
distributions to the BACs holders as of March 31, 2002. The Partnership does not
anticipate providing cash distributions to its BACs holders other than from net
refinancing or sales proceeds.


                                      -9-
<Page>

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

The information set forth below presents selected financial data of the
Partnership. Additional financial information is set forth in the audited
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 hereof.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                               FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATIONS                  2002            2001            2000            1999            1998
----------              ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Revenues                $ 15,417,026    $ 14,946,838    $ 14,333,134    $ 13,968,742    $ 13,504,955
Expenses                 (19,207,657)    (19,238,172)    (18,617,952)    (18,748,002)    (18,672,456)
Loss on impairment of
assets                             0      (2,065,000)       (500,000)              0      (1,100,000)
                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Loss before minority
interest                  (3,790,631)     (6,356,334)     (4,784,818)     (4,779,260)     (6,267,501)
Minority interest             39,461          48,280          50,054          50,809          69,986
                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Net loss                $ (3,751,170)   $ (6,308,054)   $ (4,734,764)   $ (4,728,451)   $ (6,197,515)
                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============

Per BAC:
Net loss                $     (50.94)   $     (85.67)   $     (64.30)   $     (64.22)   $     (84.17)
                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============

<Caption>
                                                         MARCH 31,
                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATIONS                  2002            2001            2000            1999            1998
----------              ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Total assets            $ 97,175,105    $100,937,211    $107,181,062    $111,946,154    $116,339,040
                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============

Mortgage notes payable  $ 68,063,227    $ 69,021,892    $ 69,914,088    $ 70,447,844    $ 71,068,616
                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============

Total liabilities       $ 79,553,880    $ 79,602,583    $ 79,522,764    $ 79,491,693    $ 79,548,347
                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============

Total partners' capital $  9,605,982    $ 13,357,152    $ 19,669,754    $ 24,407,636    $ 29,133,636
                        ============    ============    ============    ============    ============
</Table>


                                      -10-
<Page>

Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

GENERAL

During the year ended March 31, 2002, net cash flow from property operations,
working capital, interest earned on working capital and distributions received
from the Local Partnerships represents the primary source of liquidity to fund
distributions, debt service, capital improvements and non-revenue enhancing
tenant improvements. Our net cash flow from property operations is dependent
upon the occupancy level of our properties, the collectibility of rent from our
tenants, the level of operating and other expenses, and other factors. Material
changes in these factors may adversely affect our net cash flow from property
operations. Such changes, in turn, would adversely affect our ability to fund
distributions, debt service, capital improvements and non-revenue enhancing
tenant improvements. In addition, a material adverse change in our net cash flow
from operations may affect the financial performance covenants under our
mortgage notes within each Local Partnership. If we fail to meet any of our
financial performance covenants, our mortgage notes may become due and in
default, or the interest charged on refinancing the notes may increase. Either
of these circumstances could adversely affect our ability to fund working
capital and revenue enhancing tenant improvements, and unanticipated cash needs.

Working capital of approximately $21,000 (unconsolidated) remains as of March
31, 2002. It is used to pay operating expenses of the Partnership, including
Partnership management fees payable to the General Partners and advances to
Local Partnerships if warranted. The Partnership is dependent upon the support
of the General Partners and certain of its affiliates in order to meet its
obligations at the Partnership level. The General Partners and these affiliates
have agreed to continue such support for the foreseeable future.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, cash and cash equivalents of the
Partnership and its forty-two Local Partnerships increased approximately
$163,000 due to cash provided by operating activities ($1,743,000), an increase
in capitalization of consolidated subsidiaries attributable to minority interest
($77,000) and a net increase in due to local general partners and affiliates
relating to investing and financing activities ($76,000) which exceeded capital
improvements ($772,000) and repayments of mortgage loans ($959,000). Included in
the adjustments to reconcile the net loss to cash provided by operating
activities is depreciation and amortization ($5,009,000).

During the years ended March 31, 2002 ("Fiscal Year 2002"), March 31, 2001
("Fiscal Year 2001") and March 31, 2000 ("Fiscal Year 2000") the amounts
received from the Local Partnerships were $3,637, $26,796 and $24,406,
respectively. Cash distributions from Local Partnerships are not expected to
reach a level sufficient to permit cash distributions to BACs holders. These
distributions, as well as the working capital reserves referred to in the
paragraph above, will be used to meet the operating expenses of the Partnership.

Effective January 1, 1999 the State of California now requires owners of a
property benefiting from FHA insured mortgages under Section 236 or 221(a)(3) to
provide a nine month notice of contract termination or prepayment of the FHA
insured loan. In addition, the owner must offer the properties for sale to those
entities who agree to maintain the property as affordable housing.

On October 20, 1999 President Clinton signed the Fiscal Year 2000 VA, the HUD
Independent Agencies Appropriations Act (the "Appropriations Act"). The
Appropriations Act contains


                                      -11-
<Page>

revisions to the HUD Mark-to-Market Program and other HUD programs concerning
the preservation of the HUD housing stock. On December 29, 1999 HUD issued
Notice H99-36 addressing "Project Based Section 8 Contracts Expiring in Fiscal
Year 2000," reflecting the changes in the Appropriations Act and superceding
earlier HUD Notices 98-34, 99-08, 99-15, 99-21 and 99-32. Notice 99-36 clarifies
many of the earlier uncertainties with respect to the earlier HUD Section 8
Mark-to-Market Programs and continued the Mark-to-Market Program which allows
owners with Section 8 contracts to increase the rents to market levels where
contract rents are currently below market. As of March 31, 2002, none of the
Local Partnerships have opted to enter the Mark-to-Market Program and therefore
this has no impact on the Partnership.

The Partnership's most critical accounting policy relates to the evaluation of
the fair value of real estate. Each Local Partnership evaluates the need for an
impairment loss on its real estate assets when indicators of impairment are
present and the undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the
asset's carrying amount. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair
value of the asset to its carrying amount. In addition, estimates are used when
accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, and contingent liabilities,
among others. These estimate are susceptible to change and actual results could
differ from these estimates. The affects of changes in these estimates are
recognized in the period they are determined.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of March 31, 2002, we were subject to the following contractual payment
obligations:
<Table>
<Caption>
                                                    PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               LESS                                         AFTER
Contractual obligations      TOTAL          THAN 1 YEAR      1-3 YEARS      4-5 YEARS      5 YEARS
                           -----------     -------------  ---------------  -----------    -----------
<S>                        <C>             <C>            <C>              <C>            <C>
Mortgage notes payable     $68,063,227       $928,807         $2,133,062    $2,527,373     $62,473,985
</Table>

Each Local Partnership's mortgage note payable is collateralized by the land and
buildings of the respective Local Partnership, the assignment of certain Local
Partnership's rents, leases and replacement reserves and is without further
recourse.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Partnership is subject to risks incident to potential losses arising from
the management and ownership of improved real estate. The Partnership can also
be affected by poor economic conditions generally, however no more than 24% of
the properties are located in any single state. There are also substantial risks
associated with owning properties receiving government assistance, for example
the possibility that Congress may not appropriate funds to enable HUD to make
rental assistance payments. HUD also restricts annual cash distributions to
partners based on operating results and a percentage of the owners equity
contribution. The Partnership cannot sell or substantially liquidate its
investments in subsidiary partnerships during the period that the subsidy
agreements are in existence, without HUD's approval. Furthermore there may not
be market demand for apartments at full market rents when the rental assistance
contract expires.

Except as described above, management is not aware of any trends or events,
commitments or uncertainties, which have not otherwise been disclosed, that will
or are likely to impact liquidity in a material way. Management believes the
only impact would be from laws that have not yet been adopted. The portfolio is
diversified by the location of the properties around the United States so that
if one area of the country is experiencing downturns in the economy, the
remaining properties in the portfolio may not be affected. However, the
geographic diversification of the portfolio may not protect against a general
downturn in the national economy.


                                      -12-
<Page>

For a discussion of contingencies affecting a certain Local Partnership, see
"Results of Operations of a Certain Local Partnership" below. Since the maximum
loss the Partnership would be liable for is its net investment in the Local
Partnerships, the resolution of the existing contingencies is not anticipated to
impact future results of operations, liquidity or financial condition in a
material way. However, the Partnership's loss of its investment in a Local
Partnership would eliminate the ability to generate future Housing Tax Credits
from such Local Partnership and may also result in recapture of Housing Tax
Credits if the investment is lost before the expiration of the Credit Period.

The Partnership has fully invested the proceeds of its offering in 42 Local
Partnerships, all of which have their Housing Tax Credits in place. The Housing
Tax Credits are attached to the project for a period of ten years and are
transferable with the property during the remainder of the ten year period. If
trends in the real estate market warranted the sale of a property, the remaining
Housing Tax Credits would transfer to the new owner, thereby adding significant
value to the property on the market.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH GENERAL PARTNERS AND AFFILIATES

The Local General Partners may from time to time advance the Local Partnerships
money to fund certain property costs. These advances are to be repaid to the
Local General Partners without interest from available surplus cash of the
respective Local Partnership, or at the time of sale or refinancing. Unpaid
balance amounted to $3,819,933 and $3,623,616 at March 31, 2002 and 2001,
respectively, and is recorded as due to Local General Partners and affiliates on
the consolidated balance sheets.

Certain costs are also incurred by the Partnership payable to affiliates. The
General Partners are entitled to receive a partnership management fee, after
payment of all Partnership expenses, which together with the annual local
administrative fees will not exceed a maximum of 0.5% per annum of Invested
Assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement), for administering the affairs
of the Partnership. Subject to the foregoing limitation, the partnership
management fee will be determined by the General Partners in their sole
discretion based upon their review of the Partnership's investment. Partnership
management fee amounted to $676,000 for each of the fiscal years ended March 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000. Unpaid partnership management fees for any year will be
accrued without interest and will be payable from working capital reserves or to
the extent of available funds after the Partnership has made distributions to
the Limited Partners and BACs holders of sale or refinancing proceeds equal to
their original capital contributions plus a 10% priority return thereon (to the
extent not theretofore paid out of Cash flow). Partnership management fees owed
to General Partners amounting to approximately $4,856,000 and $4,180,000 were
accrued and unpaid as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Without the
General Partners continued accrual without payment, the Partnership will not be
in a position to meet its obligations. The General Partners have continued
allowing the accrual without payment of these amounts, but are under no
obligation to continue to do so. The Partnership is dependent upon the support
of the General Partner and certain of its affiliates in order to meet its
obligations at the Partnership level. The General Partner and these affiliates
have agreed to continue such support for the foreseeable future.

Furthermore, the Partnership reimburses the General Partners and their
affiliates for actual Partnership operating expenses incurred by the General
Partners and their affiliates on the Partnership's behalf. The amount of
reimbursement from the Partnership is limited by the provision of the
Partnership Agreement and could fluctuate from year to year depending upon the
level of activities and transactions for the year. Services performed by these
affiliates include monitoring of partnership assets, site visits and evaluations
of local partnership performance. Amount of reimbursement amounted to
approximately $119,000, $244,000 and $179,000 for the fiscal years ended March
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.


                                      -13-
<Page>

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of", the Partnership is required to review long-lived assets and
certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset may not be recoverable.
The Partnership periodically compares the carrying value of its Properties to
its estimate of the sum of undiscounted future cash flows and the fair value of
remaining Tax Credits, to determine if the carrying value of the Property is
impaired. If the Property is considered impaired based on this analysis, an
impairment loss is recorded in order to write down the Property to its fair
value. The determination of fair value is based not only upon future cash flows,
which rely upon estimates and assumptions including expense growth, occupancy
and rental rates, but also upon market capitalization and discount rates as well
as other market indicators. The General Partners believe that the estimates and
assumptions used are appropriate in evaluating the carrying amount of the
Partnership's interest in the Properties. However, changes in market conditions
and circumstances may occur in the near term which would cause these estimates
and assumptions to change, which, in turn, could cause the amounts ultimately
realized upon the sale or other disposition of the Properties to differ
materially from their estimated fair value. Such changes may also require
write-downs in future years. During the period April 1, 1999 through March 31,
2002, the Partnership has recorded $2,565,000 of losses on impairment of assets.

The following is a summary of the results of operations of the Partnership for
the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

The Partnership's primary source of income continues to be rental income with
the corresponding expenses being divided among operations, depreciation, and
mortgage interest.

Rental income is recognized as rent becomes due. Rental payments received in
advance are deferred until earned. The Partnership received rental subsidies
which amounted to approximately $2,953,000, $2,904,000 and $2,827,000 for the
years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The related rental
subsidy programs have expiration dates that either expire subsequent to the year
2002 or terminate upon total disbursement of the assistance obligation.

2002 VS. 2001

Rental income increased approximately 3% for the year ended March 31, 2002 as
compared to 2001 primarily due to rental rate increases.

No major expense categories, other than the loss on impairment of assets,
changed more than 6% for the year ended March 31, 2002 as compared to 2001.

2001 VS. 2000

Rental income increased approximately 3% for the year ended March 31, 2001 as
compared to 2000 primarily due to rental rate increases.

Other increased approximately $266,000 for the year ended March 31, 2001 as
compared to 2000 primarily due to the underaccrual of interest income for the
years ended December 31, 1999 and prior at one Local Partnership.


                                      -14-
<Page>

No major expense categories, excluding the loss on impairment of assets, changed
more than 8% for the year ended March 31, 2001 as compared to 2000.

OTHER

The Partnership continues to meet its primary objective of generating Housing
Tax Credits. Housing Tax Credits are generated by a Property over a ten-year
period commencing as each Property is leased to qualified tenants. During the
years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Housing Tax Credits received by
the Partnership totaled $6,782,384, $11,106,285 and $11,200,999, respectively.
Based on the fact that all the Local Partnerships' tax credits will be expiring
in the year 2002, the Partnership expects the Tax Credits to be received in
fiscal year 2003 to be approximately $2,000,000.

The Partnership's investments as limited partners in the Local Partnerships are
subject to the risks incident to the management and ownership of improved real
estate. The Partnership's investments also could be adversely affected by poor
economic conditions generally, which could increase vacancy levels, rental
payment defaults and operating expenses, any or all of which could threaten the
financial viability of one or more of the Local Partnerships.

There are also substantial risks associated with the operation of Apartment
Complexes receiving government assistance. These include governmental
regulations concerning tenant eligibility, which may make it more difficult to
rent apartments in the complexes; difficulties in obtaining government approval
for rent increases; limitations on the percentage of income which low and
moderate income tenants may pay as rent; the possibility that Congress may not
appropriate funds to enable HUD to make the rental assistance payments it has
contracted to make; and that when the rental assistance contracts expire there
may not be market demand for apartments at full market rents in a Local
Partnership's Apartment Complex.

The Local Partnerships are impacted by inflation in several ways. Inflation
generally allows for increases in rental rates to reflect the impact of higher
operating and replacement costs. Inflation also affects the Local Partnerships
adversely by increasing operating costs as a result of higher costs of such
items as fuel, utilities and labor. However, continued inflation may result in
appreciated values of the Local Partnerships' Apartment Complexes over a period
of time as rental revenues and replacement costs continue to increase.

The Partnership does not anticipate that it will be in a position to make cash
distributions at any time prior to the disposition of the Properties. If
distributions of operating cash flow are made, it is expected that they will be
limited. As of March 31, 2002, no such distributions have been made.

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141 "Business Combinations" and No. 142
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase
method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June
30, 2001 and that the use of pooling-of-interest method is no longer allowed.
SFAS No. 142 requires that upon adoption, amortization of goodwill will cease
and instead, the carrying value of goodwill will be evaluated for impairment on
an annual basis. Identifiable intangible assets will continue to be amortized
over their useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No.
144 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of". SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. The adoption of these standards will not have any
impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.


                                      -15-
<Page>

Additionally, the Financial Accounting Standard Board has issued SFAS No. 144
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" in August 2001
and SFAS No. 145 "Rescission of SFAS No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of SFAS No.
13, and Technical Corrections" in April 2002. SFAS No. 144 and 145 are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and May 15, 2002,
respectively. The adoption of these standards will not have any impact on the
Partnership's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 7a.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The Partnership is not exposed to market risk since its mortgage indebtedness
bears fixed rates of interest.


                                      -16-
<Page>

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                   SEQUENTIAL
                                                                                      PAGE
                                                                                   ----------
<S>       <C>                                                                      <C>
(a) 1.    Financial Statements

          Independent Auditors' Reports                                                18

          Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2002 and 2001                    79

          Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31,
          2002, 2001 and 2000                                                          80

          Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit) for
          the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000                                81

          Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
          March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000                                                82

          Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                   84
</Table>


                                      -17-
<Page>

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Partners
Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Freedom Tax
Credit Plus L.P. and consolidated partnerships as of March 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners'
capital (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended March 31, 2002. In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules.
These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules
are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial
statement schedules based on our audits. We did not audit the financial
statements of 25 and 26 of the consolidated partnerships, which statements
reflect combined assets constituting 46% and 44% as of March 31, 2002 and 2001,
and combined revenues constituting 40%, 47% and 37% for 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively, of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited
by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion,
insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those partnerships, is based
solely on the reports of the other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of
the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. and
consolidated partnerships as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended March 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.

                                                              /s/ KPMG LLP


New York, New York
May 18, 2002


                                      -18-
<Page>

[Letterhead of McKonly & Asbury LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

The Partners of
Parkside Townhomes Associates
Lancaster, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Parkside Townhomes Associates
(a limited partnership), PHFA Project No. 0 - 90 as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the related statements of profit and loss, partners' equity, and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parkside Townhomes Associates
at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and its profit and loss, partners' equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and Pennsylvania Housing
Finance Agency's Financial Reporting Manual, we have also issued our report
dated January 17, 2002 on our consideration of Parkside Townhomes Associates
internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, PHFA regulations, contracts and grants and have
rendered our reports thereon on pages 29 and 30. Those reports are an integral
part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and
should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our
audits.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information on pages 18
through 24 is presented for the purpose of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ McKonly & Asbury LLP
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
January 17, 2002


                                      -19-
<Page>

[Letterhead of McKonly & Asbury LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

The Partners of
Parkside Townhomes Associates
Lancaster, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Parkside Townhomes Associates
(a limited partnership), as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
statements of income, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Parkside Townhomes Associates
at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and its income, partners' equity, and cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and Pennsylvania Housing
Finance Agency's HOMES Financial Reporting Manual, we have also issued a report
dated February 11, 2000 on our consideration of Parkside Townhomes Associates
internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants.

/s/ McKonly & Asbury LLP
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
February 11, 2000


                                      -20-
<Page>

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Partners of
Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited
Partnership (a Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited
Partnership at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and
cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Lake, Hill & Myers
Salt Lake City, Utah
January 14, 2002


                                      -21-
<Page>

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Partners of
Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited
Partnership (a Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited
Partnership at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and
cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

/s/ Lake, Hill & Myers
Salt Lake City, Utah
January 24, 2001


                                      -22-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Friedman Alpren & Green LLP]

INDEPEDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

TO THE PARTNERS OF WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2001, and the related statements of operations,
changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2001, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Friedman Alpren & Green LLP
New York, New York
February 20, 2002


                                      -23-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Friedman Alpren & Green LLP]

INDEPEDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

TO THE PARTNERS OF WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2000, and the related statements of operations,
changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Friedman Alpren & Green LLP
New York, New York
February 20, 2001


                                      -24-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Friedman Alpren & Green LLP]

INDEPEDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

TO THE PARTNERS OF WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of operations,
changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of WASHINGTON BROOKLYN LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

/s/ Friedman Alpren & Green LLP
New York, New York
January 28, 2000


                                      -25-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Richard J. Klinkowitz]

To the Partners
C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES
(A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
625 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022

Gentlemen:

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ASSOCIATES (a New York Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and the
related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on the audit.

I conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
I believe that the audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES as
of December 31, 2001 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard J. Klinkowitz
Far Rockaway, New York
February 22, 2002


                                      -26-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Richard J. Klinkowitz]

To the Partners
C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES
(A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
625 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022

Gentlemen:

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ASSOCIATES (a New York Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and the
related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on the audit.

I conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
I believe that the audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES as
of December 31, 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard J. Klinkowitz
Far Rockaway, New York
February 22, 2001


                                      -27-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Richard J. Klinkowitz]

To the Partners
C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES
(A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
625 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022

Gentlemen:

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ASSOCIATES (a New York Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and the
related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on the audit.

I conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
I believe that the audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES as
of December 31, 1999 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard J. Klinkowitz
Far Rockaway, New York
February 20, 2000


                                      -28-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT

To the Partners Davidson Court, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Davidson Court, L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Davidson Court, L.P., as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations, the changes in
partners' equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Bethesda, Maryland
February 1, 2001


                                      -29-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Magnolia Mews Limited Partnership
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP (a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001, and
the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2001, and the results of its operations, changes
in partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.
Moorestown, New Jersey
February 8, 2002


                                      -30-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Magnolia Mews Limited Partnership
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP (a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000, and
the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations, changes
in partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.
Moorestown, New Jersey
January 26, 2001


                                      -31-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.]

The Partners
The Oaks Village Limited Partnership
Dunn, North Carolina

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Oaks Village Limited
Partnership, Project No. 38-024-561572445 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of The Oaks Village Limited
Partnership, Project No. 38-024-561572445 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and
cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on Page 14
is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of
the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and,
in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report
dated January 29, 2001 on our consideration of The Oaks Village Limited
Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, and should be read in conjunction with this
report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Snipes, Gower & Assoc., P.A.
Dunn, North Carolina
January 29, 2001


                                      -32-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.]

The Partners
Greenfield Village Limited Partnership
Dunn, North Carolina

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Greenfield Village Limited
Partnership, RHS Project No.: 38-043-561614646, as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and
cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits, provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Greenfield Village Limited
Partnership RHS Project No.: 38-043-561614646 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and
its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplement information on Page 14 is
presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the
basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as whole.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report
dated January 23, 2001 on our consideration of Greenfield Village Limited
Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report
in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.
Dunn, North Carolina
January 23, 2001


                                      -33-
<Page>

[Letterhead of KOCH GERINGER & CO., LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
CLM Equities

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CLM Equities (A Limited
Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and the related statements of operations,
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of CLM Equities (A Limited
Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and the results of its operations, changes
in its partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ KOCH GERINGER & CO., LLP
Certified Public Accountants
New York, New York
January 9, 2002


                                      -34-
<Page>

[Letterhead of KOCH GERINGER & CO., LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
CLM Equities

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CLM Equities (A Limited
Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and the related statements of operations,
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of CLM Equities (A Limited
Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and the results of its operations, changes
in its partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KOCH GERINGER & CO., LLP
Certified Public Accountants
New York, New York
January 18, 2000


                                      -35-
<Page>


[Letterhead of NANAS, STERN, BIERS, NEINSTEIN AND CO. LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Partners
Victoria Manor Associates
Los Angeles, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Victoria Manor Associates (a
California limited partnership), as of December 31, 2001, and the related
statements of partners' equity, operations and cash flows for the year then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Victoria Manor Associates as of
December 31, 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.

/s/ Nanas, Stern, Biers, Neinstein and Co. LLP
January 25, 2002
Beverly Hills, California


                                      -36-
<Page>

[Letterhead of NANAS, STERN, BIERS, NEINSTEIN AND CO. LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Partners
Victoria Manor Associates
Beverly Hills, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Victoria Manor Associates (a
California limited partnership), as of December 31, 1999, and the related
statements of partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Victoria Manor Associates as of
December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Nanas, Stern, Biers, Neinstein and Co. LLP
January 12, 2000
Beverly Hills, California


                                      -37-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Fishbein & Company, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Partners
Ogontz Hall Investors
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of OGONTZ HALL INVESTORS (A
Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No. 0-0116, as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related statements of profit and loss, partners' equity and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits
contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of
the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ogontz Hall Investors (A
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its
operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.

Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supporting data included in this
report (shown on pages 19 through 23) is presented for purposes of additional
analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of Ogontz
Hall Investors. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements
taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 18, 2002, on our consideration of Ogontz Hall Investors' (A
Limited Partnership) internal control and over financial reporting and our test
of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and
grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report
in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ Fishbein & Company, P.C.
Elkins Park, PA
January 18, 2002


                                      -38-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Fishbein & Company, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Partners
Ogontz Hall Investors
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of OGONTZ HALL INVESTORS (A
Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No. 0-0116, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related statements of profit and loss, partners' equity and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ogontz Hall Investors as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information included in
this report (shown on pages 25 through 31) is presented for purposes of
additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements
of the Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial
statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 19, 2001, on our consideration of Ogontz Hall Investors' internal
control and a report dated January 19, 2001, on compliance. That report is an
integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing
Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the
results of our audit.

/s/ Fishbein & Company, P.C.
Elkins Park, PA
January 19, 2001


                                      -39-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership
Madison, Wisconsin

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Eagle Ridge Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of
operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information provided, as
identified in the table of contents, is presented for purposes of additional
analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit
of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

/s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Madison, Wisconsin
January 18, 2001


                                      -40-
<Page>

[Regen, Benz & MacKenzie, C.P.A's, P.C. Letterhead]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing
Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Nelson Anderson Affordable
Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements
of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Nelson Anderson Affordable
Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1999, and the results of its
operations, the changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then
ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Regen, Benz & MacKenzie
New York, New York
February 25, 2000


                                      -41-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners
Conifer Irondequoit Associates
(A Limited Partnership)
Irondequoit, New York

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Conifer Irondequoit
Associates (A Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
related statements of changes in partners' equity, operations and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Conifer Irondequoit Associates
(A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its
operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.
Rochester, New York
January 30, 2002


                                      -42-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners
Conifer Irondequoit Associates
(A Limited Partnership)
Irondequoit, New York

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Conifer Irondequoit
Associates (A Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related statements of changes in partners' equity, operations and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Conifer Irondequoit Associates
(A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.
Rochester, New York
January 23, 2001


                                      -43-
<Page>

[Letterhead of REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners of
Middletown Associates

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Middletown Associates as of
December 31, 2001, and the related statements of profit and loss, changes in
partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit. The financial statement of Middletown Associates for the year ended
December 31, 2000, were audited by other auditors whose report, dated January
18, 2001, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits
contained in GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of
the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the 2001 financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Middletown Associates as of
December 31, 2001, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our 2001 audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 24
through 27 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued our report
for the year ended December 31, 2001, dated January 25, 2002, on our
consideration of Middletown Associates' internal control over financial
reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws,
regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in
conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit.

/s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
Baltimore, Maryland
January 25, 2002


                                      -44-
<Page>

[Letterhead of ZINER, KENNEDY & LEHAN LLP]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners of
Middletown Associates

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Middletown Associates (a
Pennsylvania limited partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Middletown Associates at
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations, changes in
partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ ZINER, KENNEDY & LEHAN LLP
Quincy, Massachusetts
January 15, 2000


                                      -45-
<Page>

[REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN LETTERHEAD]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Flipper Temple Associates, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Flipper Temple Associates,
L.P., as of December 31, 2000, and the related statements of operations,
partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Flipper Temple Associates,
L.P., as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations, the changes in
partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 23 through 28
is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of
the basic financial statements. Such supplemental information has been subjected
to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and the "Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated January 25,
2001 on our consideration of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P.'s internal control
and on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD
programs and fair housing and non-discrimination. Those reports are an integral
part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and
should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our
audit.

/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-1088612
Bethesda, Maryland
January 25, 2001
Lead Auditor: Robert J. Denmark


                                      -46-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners of
220 Cooper Street, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of 220 Cooper Street, L.P., as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations,
partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P.
Mount Laurel, NJ
February 6, 2002


                                      -47-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners of
220 Cooper Street, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of 220 Cooper Street, L.P., as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, an error resulting in
understatement of previously reported interest income was discovered by
management of the Partnership during the current year. Accordingly, an
adjustment has been made to partners' equity as of January 1, 1999, and to
interest income for the year ended December 31, 1999, to correct the error.

/s/ Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P.
Mount Laurel, NJ
February 9, 2001


                                      -48-
<Page>

[ARCHAMBO, MUEGGENBORG & DICK, INC. LETTERHEAD]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
Pecan Creek Limited Partnership
Bartlesville, Oklahoma

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pecan Creek Limited
Partnership, HUD Project No. FHA 118-35121 (a limited partnership), as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income, changes in
partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Project's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in
its partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, we have also issued reports dated January 21, 2002 on our
consideration of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership's internal control, on its
compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD programs, specific
requirements applicable to nonmajor HUD program transactions, and specific
requirements applicable to Fair Housing and Non-Discrimination. Those reports
are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance Government Auditing
Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the
results of our audit.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information shown on pages 15-17
and the information transmitted to the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) is prepared for the purpose of additional analysis and is not
a required part of the financial statements of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented
in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole.

/s/ Archambo, Mueggenborg & Dick, Inc.
Deborah E. Mueggenborg, Audit Partner
Certified Public Accountants
73-1439902
Bartsville, Oklahoma
January 21, 2002


                                      -49-
<Page>

[ARCHAMBO, MUEGGENBORG & DICK, INC. LETTERHEAD]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
Pecan Creek Limited Partnership
Bartlesville, Oklahoma

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pecan Creek Limited
Partnership, HUD Project No. FHA 118-35121 (a limited partnership), as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements of income, changes in
partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Project's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations, changes in
its partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, we have also issued reports dated January 22, 2001 on our
consideration of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership's internal control, on its
compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD programs, specific
requirements applicable to nonmajor HUD program transactions, and specific
requirements applicable to Fair Housing and Non-Discrimination. Those reports
are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with this report in
considering the results of our audit.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information shown on pages 15-17
and the information transmitted to the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) is prepared for the purpose of additional analysis and is not
a required part of the financial statements of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in
all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Archambo, Mueggenborg & Dick, Inc.
Deborah E. Mueggenborg, Audit Partner
Certified Public Accountants
73-1439902
Bartsville, Oklahoma
January 22, 2001


                                      -50-
<Page>

[Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 363 Grand Vendome Associates,
Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001, and the related statements of
Loss, Partners' Capital and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted our audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We are unable to obtain adequate support for the carrying value for the building
construction and rehabilitation costs included in the fixed assets at December
31, 2001, which also affected material amounts included in the Statements of
Loss and Partners' Capital for the year then ended as described in Note 10.

In our opinion, except for the effects on the financial statements of such
adjustments, if any, as might have been determined to be necessary had we been
able to examine evidence regarding the carrying value of building and
rehabilitation costs, the financial statements referred to in the first
paragraph above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2001,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Agbimson & Co., PLLC
Rockville Centre, New York
January 30, 2002


                                      -51-
<Page>

[Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 363 Grand Vendome Associates,
Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2000, and the related statements of
Loss, Partners' Capital and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted our audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We are unable to obtain adequate support for the carrying value for the building
construction and rehabilitation costs included in the fixed assets at December
31, 2000, which also affected material amounts included in the Statements of
Loss and Partners' Capital for the year then ended as described in Note 10.

In our opinion, except for the effects on the financial statements of such
adjustments, if any, as might have been determined to be necessary had we been
able to examine evidence regarding the carrying value of building and
rehabilitation costs, the financial statements referred to in the first
paragraph above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2000,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Agbimson & Co., PLLC
Rockville Centre, New York
February 9, 2001


                                      -52-
<Page>

[Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 363 Grand Vendome Associates,
Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of
Loss, Partners' Capital and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted our audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We are unable to obtain adequate support for the carrying value for the building
construction and rehabilitation costs included in the fixed assets at December
31, 1999, which also affected material amounts included in the Statements of
Loss and Partners' Capital for the year then ended as described in Note 10.

In our opinion, except for the effects on the financial statements of such
adjustments, if any, as might have been determined to be necessary had we been
able to examine evidence regarding the carrying value of building and
rehabilitation costs, the financial statements referred to in the first
paragraph above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 1999,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Agbimson & Co., PLLC
Rockville Centre, New York
February 11, 2000


                                      -53-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
New Augusta Associates, Ltd.
New Augusta, Mississippi

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.,
a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.,
RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 8, 2002 on our consideration of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 8, 2002


                                      -54-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
New Augusta Associates, Ltd.
New Augusta, Mississippi

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.
a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.,
RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 19, 2001 on our consideration of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 19, 2001


                                      -55-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Pine Shadow, Ltd.
Waveland, Mississippi

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pine Shadow, Ltd. a limited
partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Pine Shadow, Ltd., RHS Project
No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 6, 2002 on our consideration of Pine Shadow, Ltd.'s internal
control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 6, 2002


                                      -56-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Pine Shadow, Ltd.
Waveland, Mississippi

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pine Shadow, Ltd. a limited
partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Pine Shadow, Ltd., RHS Project
No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 6, 2001 on our consideration of Pine Shadow, internal control
over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 6, 2001


                                      -57-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Windsor Place, L.P.
Wedowee, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Windsor Place, L.P. a limited
partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Windsor Place, L.P., RHS
Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 17, 2002 on our consideration of Windsor Place, L.P.'s internal
control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 17, 2002


                                      -58-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Windsor Place, L.P.
Wedowee, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Windsor Place, L.P. a limited
partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, In
all material respects, the financial position of Windsor Place, L.P., RHS
Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 17, 2001 on our consideration of Windsor Place, L.P., internal
control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 17, 2001


                                      -59-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Brookwood Associates, Ltd.
Foley, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 26, 2002 on our consideration of Brookwood Associates, Ltd.,'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 26, 2002


                                      -60-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Brookwood Associates, Ltd.
Foley, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 20, 2001 on our consideration of Brookwood Associates, Ltd.,'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 20, 2001


                                      -61-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.
Heflin, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heflin Hills Apartments,
Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December
31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.,
RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 8, 2002 on our consideration of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 8, 2002


                                      -62-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.
Heflin, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heflin Hills Apartments,
Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.,
RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 19, 2001 on our consideration of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 19, 2001


                                      -63-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Shadowood Apartments, Ltd.
Stevenson, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, In
all material respects, the financial position of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 18, 2002 on our consideration of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd.'s,
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 18, 2002


                                      -64-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Shadowood Apartments, Ltd.
Stevenson, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, In
all material respects, the financial position of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 24, 2001 on our consideration of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd.'s,
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 24, 2001


                                      -65-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Brittany Associates, L.P.
Dekalb, Mississippi.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brittany Associates, L.P., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Brittany Associates, L.P. RHS
Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 28, 2002 on our consideration of Brittany Associates, L.P.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 28, 2002


                                      -66-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Brittany Associates, L.P.
Dekalb, Ms.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brittany Associates, L.P., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Brittany Associates, L.P. RHS
Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 20, 2001 on our consideration of Brittany Associates, L.P.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 20, 2001


                                      -67-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.
Brewton, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hidden Valley Apartments,
Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and
cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.
RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 9, 2002 on our consideration of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 9, 2002


                                      -68-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.
Brewton, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hidden Valley Apartments,
Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31,
2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and
cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.
RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 15, 2001 on our consideration of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 15, 2001


                                      -69-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Bob T. Robinson]

To the Partners
Westbrook Square, Ltd.

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Westbrook Square, Ltd. (RD Case
number 28-040-640770978) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related
statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's
management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my
audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Westbrook Square, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, I have also issued a report
dated March 20, 2002 on my consideration of the partnership's internal control
structure and a report dated March 20, 2002 on its compliance with laws and
regulations.

My audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for the
purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial
statements of Westbrook Square, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in my
opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the
financial statements taken as a whole.

The annual budgets of Westbrook Square, Ltd. included in the accompanying
prescribed form RD 1930-7 (Rev 7-00) have not been compiled or examined by me,
and I do not express any form of assurance on them. In addition they may contain
departures from guidelines for presentation of prospective financial information
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The
actual results may vary from the presentation and the variations may be
material.

/s/ Bob T. Robinson
Jackson, Mississippi
March 20, 2002


                                      -70-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Bob T. Robinson]

To the Partners
Westbrook Square, Ltd.

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Westbrook Square, Ltd. (RD Case
number 28-040-640770978) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related
statements of income, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's
management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my
opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Westbrook Square, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, I have also issued a report
dated March 5, 2001 on my consideration of the partnership's internal control
structure and a report dated March 5, 2001 on its compliance with laws and
regulations.

My audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information, including separate
reports on compliance with laws and regulations and on internal controls, is
presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of
the financial statements of Westbrook Square, Ltd. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial
statements and, in my opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in
relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

The annual budgets of Westbrook Square, Ltd. included in the accompanying
prescribed form RD 1930-7 (Rev 10-96) have not been compiled or examined by me,
and, accordingly, I do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on
them.

/s/ Bob T. Robinson
Jackson, Mississippi
March 5, 2001


                                      -71-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY, CPA, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.
Warsaw, Kentucky

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.,
a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.,
RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in my opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 26, 2002 on my consideration of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.,
internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey, CPA, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 26, 2002


                                      -72-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY, CPA, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Partners
Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.
Warsaw, Kentucky

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.,
a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. My responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. I believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for
my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in my opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report
dated February 26, 2001 on my consideration of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.,
internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey, CPA, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 26, 2001


                                      -73-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
West Hill Square, Ltd.
Gordo, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of West Hill Square, Ltd., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of West Hill Square, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 19, 2002 on our consideration of West Hill Square, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 19, 2002


                                      -74-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
West Hill Square, Ltd.
Gordo, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of West Hill Square, Ltd., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of West Hill Square, Ltd., RHS
Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 19, 2001 on our consideration of West Hill Square, Ltd.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 19, 2001


                                      -75-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Elmwood Associates, L.P.
Picayune, Mississippi

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Elmwood Associates, L.P., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Elmwood Associates, L.P., RHS
Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 22, 2002 on our consideration of Elmwood Associates, L.P.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 22, 2002


                                      -76-
<Page>

[Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners
Elmwood Associates, L.P.
Picayune, Mississippi

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Elmwood Associates, L.P., a
limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash
flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted the audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home
Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Elmwood Associates, L.P., RHS
Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10
through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information
presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA
1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, is
presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing
Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated February 22, 2001 on our consideration of Elmwood Associates, L.P.'s
internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws and regulations.

/s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.
Gadsden, Alabama
February 22, 2001


                                      -77-
<Page>

[Letterhead of Grant Thornton LLP

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners
Harmony Associates

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of
December 31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity
and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of
December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Los Angeles, California

January 13, 2000


                                      -78-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                             MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001


                                     ASSETS

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                   2002              2001
                                                               -------------    --------------
<S>                                                            <C>              <C>
Property and equipment - (at cost, net of accumulated
   depreciation of $54,178,153 and $49,344,006,
   respectively) (Notes 4 and 6)                               $  88,272,567    $  92,334,593
Cash and cash equivalents                                          1,833,843        1,671,096
Investment in marketable securities (Note 2)                         109,005          109,005
Cash held in escrow                                                4,671,259        4,367,610
Deferred costs (net of accumulated amortization of
   $1,655,647 and $1,480,402, respectively) (Note 5)               1,286,292        1,458,466
Other assets                                                       1,002,139          996,441
                                                               -------------    -------------

Total Assets                                                   $  97,175,105    $ 100,937,211
                                                               =============    =============

                  LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)

Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable (Note 6)                                $  68,063,227    $  69,021,892
Accounts payable and other liabilities                             1,649,957        1,855,155
Due to local general partners and affiliates (Note 7)              3,819,933        3,623,616
Due to general partners and affiliates (Note 7)                    6,020,763        5,101,920
                                                               -------------    -------------

Total Liabilities                                                 79,553,880       79,602,583
                                                               -------------    -------------

Minority interests                                                 8,015,243        7,977,476
                                                               -------------    -------------

Partners' Capital (Deficit):
Limited partners (72,896 BACs
   issued and outstanding)                                        10,186,465       13,900,123
General partners                                                    (584,628)        (547,116)
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on marketable securities                               4,145            4,145
                                                               -------------    -------------

Total Partners' Capital (Deficit)                                  9,605,982       13,357,152
                                                               -------------    -------------

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 7 and 9)

Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital (Deficit)              $  97,175,105    $ 100,937,211
                                                               =============    =============
</Table>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


                                      -79-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                    YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                    2002            2001           2000
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>             <C>
Revenues:
Rental income                                   $ 13,742,506    $ 13,339,955    $ 12,992,738
Other                                              1,674,520       1,606,883       1,340,396
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------

Total Revenues                                    15,417,026      14,946,838      14,333,134
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------

Expenses:

Repairs and maintenance                            2,569,601       2,417,802       2,237,190
Operating and other                                1,791,861       1,756,607       1,694,083
Real estate taxes                                    986,059       1,008,991         940,475
Interest                                           4,565,170       4,647,954       4,584,473
Depreciation and amortization (Notes 4 and 5)      5,009,392       5,103,725       5,154,833
General and administrative                         2,677,059       2,674,584       2,470,982
General and administrative-related parties
   (Note 7)                                        1,608,515       1,628,509       1,535,916
Loss on impairment of assets (Note 4)                      0       2,065,000         500,000
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------

Total Expenses                                    19,207,657      21,303,172      19,117,952
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------

Loss before minority interest                     (3,790,631)     (6,356,334)     (4,784,818)

Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries             39,461          48,280          50,054
                                                ------------    ------------    ------------

Net loss                                        $ (3,751,170)   $ (6,308,054)   $ (4,734,764)
                                                ============    ============    ============

Net loss - limited partners                     $ (3,713,658)   $ (6,244,973)   $ (4,687,416)
                                                ============    ============    ============

Number of BACs outstanding                            72,896          72,896          72,896
                                                ============    ============    ============

Net loss per BAC                                $     (50.94)   $     (85.67)   $     (64.30)
                                                ============    ============    ============
</Table>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


                                      -80-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
                    YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                               ACCUMULATED
                                                                                 OTHER
                                                 LIMITED          GENERAL      COMPREHENSIVE  COMPREHENSIVE
                                  TOTAL          PARTNERS        PARTNERS      INCOME (LOSS)       LOSS
                               ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                            <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>
Partners' capital (deficit)-
   March 31, 1999              $ 24,407,636    $ 24,832,512    $   (436,687)   $     11,811

Comprehensive Loss:
Net loss                         (4,734,764)     (4,687,416)        (47,348)              0      (4,734,764)

Other Comprehensive Loss:
Net unrealized loss on
   marketable securities             (3,118)              0               0          (3,118)         (3,118)
                               ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Total Comprehensive Loss                                                                       $ (4,737,882)
                                                                                               ============

Partners' capital (deficit)-
   March 31, 2000                19,669,754      20,145,096        (484,035)          8,693

Comprehensive Loss:
Net Loss                         (6,308,054)     (6,244,973)        (63,081)              0      (6,308,054)

Other Comprehensive Loss:
Net unrealized loss on
   marketable securities             (4,548)              0               0          (4,548)         (4,548)
                               ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Total Comprehensive Loss                                                                       $ (6,312,602)
                                                                                               ============

Partners' capital (deficit)-
   March 31, 2001                13,357,152      13,900,123        (547,116)          4,145

Comprehensive Loss:
Net Loss                         (3,751,170)     (3,713,658)        (37,512)              0      (3,751,170)
                               ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Total Comprehensive Loss                                                                       $ (3,751,170)
                                                                                               ============

Partners' capital (deficit)-
March 31, 2002                 $  9,605,982    $ 10,186,465    $   (584,628)   $      4,145
                               ============    ============    ============    ============
</Table>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


                                      -81-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                    YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                    2002          2001           2000
                                                -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss                                        $(3,751,170)   $(6,308,054)   $(4,734,764)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
   provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization                     5,009,392      5,103,725      5,154,833
Loss on impairment of assets                              0      2,065,000        500,000
Gain on sale of investments                               0              0            (36)
Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries           (39,461)       (48,280)       (50,054)
(Increase) decrease in other assets                  (5,698)        85,256        150,245
Decrease in accounts payable and other
   liabilities                                     (205,198)      (254,461)      (408,012)
Increase in cash held in escrow                    (303,649)       (55,973)       (28,751)
Increase in due to general partners
   and affiliates                                   918,843        995,253        913,451
Increase in due to local general partners
   and affiliates                                   147,805         75,577        134,944
Decrease in due to local general partners
   and affiliates                                   (27,862)       (10,278)        (2,141)
                                                -----------    -----------    -----------

Net cash provided by operating activities         1,743,002      1,647,765      1,629,715
                                                -----------    -----------    -----------

Cash flows from investing activities:

   Additions to property and equipment             (772,121)      (771,026)      (714,542)
   Proceeds from sale of marketable securities            0              0         40,000
   Increase in due to local general partners
      and affiliates                                  3,570         11,012              0
   Decrease in due to local general partners
      and affiliates                                (12,255)             0       (258,262)
   Increase in deferred costs                        (3,071)             0              0
                                                -----------    -----------    -----------

Net cash used in investing activities              (783,877)      (760,014)      (932,804)
                                                -----------    -----------    -----------
</Table>


                                      -82-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                    YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
                                   (continued)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                       2002            2001          2000
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>            <C>
Cash flows from financing activities:
   Repayments of mortgage loans                        (958,665)      (892,196)      (533,756)
   Increase in due to local general partners
     and affiliates                                     241,400        221,346        342,262
   Decrease in due to local general partners
     and affiliates                                    (156,341)       (66,434)      (157,415)
   Increase (decrease) in capitalization of
     consolidated subsidiaries attributable to
     minority interest                                   77,228         37,212         (8,227)
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------

Net cash used in financing activities                  (796,378)      (700,072)      (357,136)
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents               162,747        187,679        339,775

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year        1,671,096      1,483,417      1,143,642
                                                    -----------    -----------    -----------

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year            $ 1,833,843    $ 1,671,096    $ 1,483,417
                                                    ===========    ===========    ===========

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest              $ 3,477,748    $ 3,531,298    $ 3,545,171
                                                    ===========    ===========    ===========
</Table>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


                                      -83-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

NOTE 1 - General

Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Partnership"), was organized on August 28, 1989 and commenced its public
offering on February 9, 1990 (the "Offering"). The general partners of the
Partnership are Related Freedom Associates L.P. (the "Related General Partner"),
a Delaware limited partnership, and its affiliate, Freedom GP Inc. (the "Freedom
General Partner"), a Delaware corporation, together (the "General Partners").
The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2030, unless terminated sooner
under the provision's of the partnership agreement.

The Partnership's business is to invest in other partnerships ("Local
Partnerships," "subsidiaries" or "subsidiary partnerships") owning leveraged
apartment complexes that are eligible for the low-income housing tax credit
("Housing Tax Credit") enacted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. During Fiscal
Years 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Partnership generated $6,782,384, $11,106,285 and
$11,200,999, respectively, in Housing Tax Credits.

The Partnership was authorized to issue a total of 200,000 Beneficial Assignment
Certificates ("BACs"), which had been registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for sale to the public. As of August 8, 1991 (the date on
which the Partnership held the final closing of the sale of BACs and on which
the offering was terminated), the Partnership had received $72,896,000 of gross
proceeds of the Offering from 4,780 investors.

The terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement provide, among other things, that
net profits or losses and distributions of cash flow are, in general, allocated
99% to the limited partners and BACs holders and 1% to the General Partners.

The Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partners and
certain of its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership
level. The General Partners and these affiliates have agreed to continue such
support for the next year.

NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)  Basis of Accounting and Presentation

The Partnership's fiscal year ends on March 31. All subsidiaries have calendar
year ends. Accounts of the subsidiaries have been adjusted for intercompany
transactions from January 1 through March 31. The Partnership's fiscal year ends
March 31, in order to allow adequate time for the subsidiaries financial
statements to be prepared and consolidated. The books and records of the
Partnership are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

b)  Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership
and 42 subsidiary partnerships, in which the Partnership is a limited partner,
with an ownership interest ranging from approximately 98% to 99%. All
intercompany accounts and transactions with the subsidiary partnerships have
been eliminated in consolidation. Through the rights of the Partnership and/or
an affiliate of the General Partners, which affiliate has a contractual
obligation to act on behalf of the Partnership, to remove the general partner of
the subsidiary partnerships


                                      -84-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

and to approve certain major operating and financial decisions, the Partnership
has a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary partnerships.

Increases (decreases) in the capitalization of consolidated subsidiaries
attributable to minority interest arises from cash contributions and cash
distributions to the minority interest partners.

The Partnership's investment in each subsidiary is equal to the respective
subsidiary's partners' equity less minority interest capital, if any.

c)  Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks, and investments in short-term
money market accounts (which were purchased with maturities of three months or
less).

d)  Investment in Marketable Securities

The Partnership applies the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115 "Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." At March 31, 2002 and
2001 the Partnership has classified its securities as available-for-sale.

Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with net unrealized gain
(loss) reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income until
realized. A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below
cost that is deemed other than temporary is charged to earnings resulting in the
establishment of a new cost basis for the security.

e)  Cash Held in Escrow

Cash held in escrow includes cash held in escrow, replacement reserves and
tenant security deposits.

f)  Property and Equipment

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of," the Partnership is required to review long-lived assets and
certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset may not be recoverable.
Impairment of properties to be held and used is determined to exist when
estimated amounts recoverable through future operations on an undiscounted basis
are below the properties' carrying value. If a property is determined to be
impaired, it is written down to its estimated fair value.

The determination of fair value is based, not only upon future cash flows, which
rely upon estimates and assumptions including expense growth, occupancy and
rental rates, but also upon market capitalization and discount rates as well as
other market indicators. The General Partners believe that the estimates and
assumptions used are appropriate in evaluating the carrying amount of the
Partnership's properties. However, changes in market conditions and
circumstances may occur in the near term which would cause these estimates and
assumptions to change, which, in turn, could cause the amounts ultimately
realized upon the sale or other


                                      -85-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

disposition of the properties to differ materially from their estimated fair
value. Such changes may also require write-downs in future years. During the
period April 1, 1999 through March 31, 2002 the Partnership has recorded
$2,565,000 of losses on impairment of assets.

Property and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which
range from 20 to 40 years for properties. Property is depreciated using an
accelerated or straight-line method. Equipment lives range from 5 to 7 years and
are depreciated on a straight-line basis.

g)  Rental income

Rental income is recognized as rent becomes due. Rental payments received in
advance are deferred until earned. The Partnership received rental subsidies
which amounted to approximately $2,953,000, $2,904,000 and $2,827,000 for the
years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The related rental
subsidy programs have expiration dates that terminate upon total disbursement of
the assistance obligation.

h)  Income Taxes

The Partnership is not required to provide for, or pay, any federal income
taxes. Net income or loss generated by the Partnership is passed through to the
partners and is required to be reported by them. The Partnership may be subject
to state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates. For income tax
purposes, the Partnership has a fiscal year ending December 31 (see Note 8).

i)  Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain
estimates and assumptions relating to reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. Accordingly,
actual results could differ from those estimates.

j) Net Loss Per BAC

Net loss per BAC is computed based on the net loss for the period attributed to
BAC Holders, divided by the number of BACs outstanding for the period.


                                      -86-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000


NOTE 3 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with SFAS No. 107 "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments," the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the
fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to
estimate that value:

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CASH HELD IN ESCROW, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER
LIABILITIES, DUE TO LOCAL GENERAL PARTNERS AND AFFILIATES, AND DUE TO GENERAL
PARTNERS AND AFFILIATES

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, cash held in escrow,
accounts payable and other liabilities approximates fair value. Due to Local
General Partners and Affiliates and Due to General Partners and Affiliates
would be paid from the future operations or sale of the properties which is
not readily determinable.

MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE
The fair value of mortgage notes payable is estimated, where practicable, based
on the borrowing rate currently available for similar loans.

The estimated fair values of the Partnership's mortgage notes payable are as
follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                    MARCH 31, 2002             MARCH 31, 2001
                                              --------------------------   -----------------------
                                               CARRYING                    CARRYING
                                                AMOUNT        FAIR VALUE    AMOUNT      FAIR VALUE
                                              ---------      -----------   --------    -----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>           <C>         <C>
Mortgage Notes Payable for
 which it is:

Practicable to estimate fair value            $42,466,269    $43,494,924   $43,112,563  $44,209,121
Not Practicable (a)                           $25,596,958                  $25,909,329
</Table>

(a) The mortgage notes payable are insured by HUD primarily in accordance with
Section 236 of the National Housing Act. New loans are no longer being insured
in accordance with Section 236 and presently existing loans are subject to
restrictions regarding prepayment. Management believes the estimation of fair
value to be impracticable.

NOTE 4 - Property and Equipment

The components of property and equipment are as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
                                           MARCH 31,
                                  ------------------------------
                                      2002             2001
                                  -------------    -------------
<S>                               <C>              <C>
Land                              $   5,720,520    $   5,720,520
Buildings and improvements          130,068,090      129,870,352
Other                                 6,662,110        6,087,727
                                  -------------    -------------

                                    142,450,720      141,678,599
Less: Accumulated depreciation      (54,178,153)     (49,344,006)
                                  -------------    -------------
                                  $  88,272,567    $  92,334,593
                                  =============    =============
</Table>


                                      -87-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

Depreciation expense for the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 amounted
to $4,834,147, $4,939,405 and $4,905,633, respectively.

During the years ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, accumulated depreciation of
$4,596 and $0 was written off, respectively.

The Partnership periodically compares the carrying value of its properties to
its estimate of the sum of undiscounted future cash flows and the fair value of
remaining Tax Credits, to determine if the carrying value of the property is
impaired. If the property is considered impaired based on this analysis, an
impairment loss is recorded in order to write down the property to its fair
value. In December 2000 and 1999, management of Oxford Trace ("Oxford")
completed a recoverability review of the carrying value of the property based on
an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from its use
and eventual disposition. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, management concluded
that the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by
the apartment project is less than the carrying value and, as a result, the
Partnership recorded a loss on impairment of $290,000 and $500,000 at December
31, 2000 and 1999 respectively, which reduced the carrying value to its
estimated fair value. The estimated fair value was determined by using a
discounted cash flow analysis and an estimate of the fair value of the remaining
Tax Credits.

In 2000, management of Hunters Chase Apartments ("Hunters Chase") completed a
recoverability review of the carrying value of the property based on an estimate
of undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual
disposition. As of December 31, 2000, management concluded that the sum of the
undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by the property is less
than the carrying value and, as a result, the Partnership recorded a loss on
impairment of $1,775,000, which reduced the carrying value to its estimated fair
value. The estimated fair value was determined by using a discounted cash flow
analysis and an estimate of the fair value of the remaining Tax Credits.

NOTE 5 - Deferred Costs

The components of deferred costs and their periods of amortization are as
follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
                                           MARCH 31,
                                  ---------------------------
                                     2002           2001
                                  -----------    -----------
<S>                               <C>            <C>
Financing expenses                $ 2,941,939    $ 2,938,868
Less: Accumulated amortization     (1,655,647)    (1,480,402)
                                  -----------    -----------

                                  $ 1,286,292    $ 1,458,466
                                  ===========    ===========
</Table>

Financing expenses are being amortized over the life of the related mortgages,
ranging from 15 to 50 years, using a method approximating the interest method.

Amortization of deferred costs for the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
amounted to $175,245, $164,320 and $249,200, respectively.


                                      -88-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

NOTE 6 - Mortgage Notes Payable

At March 31, 2002 and 2001, mortgages payable, all of which are fixed rate and
nonrecourse to the Local Partnerships, are summarized as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                 CARRYING AMOUNT AT
                    RANGE OF                                         MARCH 31,
NUMBER OF           INTEREST            RANGE OF            ----------------------------
MORTGAGES           RATES               MATURITIES             2002              2001
---------           -----               ----------          -----------      -----------
<S>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>              <C>
          4         0%                  2007-2016           $ 2,661,151      $ 2,383,151
         10         1%                  2015-2022            12,026,001       12,032,427
         14         3%-8.5%             2002-2042            15,568,156       16,123,219
         17         8.75%-9%            2007-2042            24,974,470       25,286,986
         13         9.24%-13.5%         2002-2042            12,833,449       13,196,109
                                                            -----------      -----------

                                                            $68,063,227      $69,021,892
                                                            ===========      ===========
</Table>

Each subsidiary partnership's mortgage note payable is collateralized by the
land and buildings of the respective subsidiary partnership, the assignment of
certain subsidiary partnership's rents, leases and replacement reserves, and is
without further recourse.

Annual principal payments required for each of the next five years are as
follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
FISCAL YEAR ENDING MARCH 31,                               AMOUNT
----------------------------                            ----------
<S>                                                      <C>
2003                                                       928,807
2004                                                     1,031,828
2005                                                     1,101,234
2006                                                     1,225,525
2007                                                     1,301,848
</Table>

On March 31, 2001, Eagle Ridge refinanced its outstanding mortgage payable of
$1,564,692 to Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority ("WHEDA").
The new note bears interest at 7.5% and requires monthly payments of $11,007
through April 1, 2016.

On December 31, 2001, Ogontz Hall consolidated its outstanding primary mortgage
from Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency ("PHFA") of $284,592 into the support
mortgage from PHFA through the Housing Opportunities Make Economic Sense
("HOMES"). The new loan bears no interest and principal payments are to be made
from any excess of revenues over expenses until maturity in March 2017.

On March 27, 2002, Pecan Creek refinanced its outstanding mortgage. The new
mortgage in the amount of $1,025,800 is payable in monthly installments of
$6,859, including principal and interest at the rate of 7.05% through March 27,
2032.


                                      -89-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

NOTE 7 - Related Party Transactions and Transactions with General Partners and
Affiliates

Freedom SLP L.P., an affiliate of the General Partners, has either a .01% or 1%
interest, as a special limited partner, in each of the Local Partnerships.

The General Partners and their affiliates and the Local General Partners and
their affiliates perform services for the Partnership and the Local
Partnerships, respectively. The costs incurred are as follows:

a)  Due to Local General Partners and Affiliates

At March 31, 2002 and 2001, a majority of the following fees were incurred in
connection with the development of the property and have been included in the
basis of the building.

Due to Local General Partners and affiliates at March 31, 2002 and 2001 consists
of the following:
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                            MARCH 31,
                                                   ------------------------------
                                                       2002              2001
                                                   ----------         -----------
<S>                                                <C>                <C>
Operating advances                                 $1,499,261         $1,299,582
Development fees                                    1,503,774          1,512,459
Due to contractor                                           0            114,620
Operating deficit loans (i)                           319,638            319,638
Management and other fees                             497,260            377,317
                                                   ----------         ----------

                                                   $3,819,933         $3,623,616
                                                   ==========         ==========
</Table>

 (i)  Operating deficit loans consist of the following:
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                            MARCH 31,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                      2002                2001
                                                   --------             --------
<S>                                                <C>                  <C>
Oxford Trace                                       $ 18,650             $ 18,650
Wilshire Park                                       191,775              191,775
</Table>

These loans are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are payable out of available
surplus cash of the respective subsidiary partnership, or at the time of sale or
refinancing.
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                            MARCH 31,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                      2002                2001
                                                   ---------            --------
<S>                                                <C>                  <C>
Parkside Townhomes                                   $84,635             $84,635
Ogontz Hall                                           24,578              24,578
</Table>

These loans are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are subordinate to the
second mortgage.

                                      -90-

<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

b)  Other Expenses

The costs incurred to related parties for the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000 were as follows:
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                  YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            2002           2001           2000
                                        ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                     <C>            <C>            <C>
Partnership management fees (a)         $  676,000     $  676,000     $  676,000
Expense reimbursement (b)                  118,659        243,998        179,194
Local administrative fee (d)                53,000         53,000         52,500
                                        ----------     ----------     ----------
Total general and administrative-
  General Partners                         847,659        972,998        907,694
                                        ----------     ----------     ----------
Property management fees
  incurred to affiliates of the
  subsidiary partnerships'
  general partners (c)                     760,856        655,511        628,222
                                        ----------     ----------     ----------
Total general and administrative-
  related parties                       $1,608,515     $1,628,509     $1,535,916
                                        ==========     ==========     ==========
</Table>

(a) The General Partners are entitled to receive a partnership management fee,
after payment of all Partnership expenses, which together with the annual local
administrative fees will not exceed a maximum of 0.5% per annum of Invested
Assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement), for administering the affairs
of the Partnership. Subject to the foregoing limitation, the partnership
management fee will be determined by the General Partners in their sole
discretion based upon their review of the Partnership's investment. Unpaid
partnership management fees for any year will be accrued without interest and
will be payable from working capital reserves or to the extent of available
funds after the Partnership has made distributions to the Limited Partners and
BACs holders of sale or refinancing proceeds equal to their original capital
contributions plus a 10% priority return thereon (to the extent not theretofore
paid out of Cash Flow). Partnership management fees owed to General Partners
amounting to approximately $4,856,000 and $4,180,000 were accrued and unpaid as
of March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Without the General Partners continued
accrual without payment, the Partnership will not be in a position to meet its
obligations. The General Partners have continued allowing the accrual without
payment of these amounts, but are under no obligation to continue to do so. The
Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partner and certain of
its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership level. The
General Partner and these affiliates have agreed to continue such support for
the foreseeable future.

(b) The Partnership reimburses the General Partners and their affiliates for
actual Partnership operating expenses incurred by the General Partners and their
affiliates on the Partnership's behalf. The amount of reimbursement from the
Partnership is limited by the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. Another
affiliate of the General Partners performs asset monitoring for the Partnership.
These services include site visits and evaluations of the subsidiary
partnerships' performance.

(c) Property management fees incurred by subsidiary partnerships amounted to
$1,051,546, $1,007,007 and $984,438 for the 2002, 2001 and 2000 Fiscal Years,
respectively. Of these fees, $760,856, $655,511 and $628,222 were incurred to
affiliates of the subsidiary partnerships.

                                      -91-

<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000


(d) Freedom SLP L.P., a special limited partner of the subsidiary
partnerships, is entitled to receive an annual local administrative fee of up to
$2,500 from each Local Partnership.

NOTE 8 - Income Taxes

A reconciliation of the financial statement net loss to the income tax loss for
the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries follows:
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                     YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                           ----------------------------------------------
                                                                               2001             2000             1999
                                                                           -----------      -----------      ------------
<S>                                                                        <C>              <C>              <C>
Financial statement

Net loss                                                                   $(3,751,170)     $(6,308,054)     $(4,734,764)

Difference resulting from parent company
   having a different fiscal year for
   income tax and financial reporting purposes                                 (56,796)         (35,552)          93,970

Difference between depreciation and
   amortization expense recorded for financial
   statement and income tax reporting purposes                                (657,137)      (1,367,593)        (556,945)

Loss on impairment                                                                   0        2,065,000          500,000

Tax-exempt interest income                                                         (86)          (1,276)          (3,892)

Other                                                                         (146,329)         257,222           93,810
                                                                           -----------      -----------      -----------

Net loss as shown on the Partnership's income tax returns                  $(4,611,518)     $(5,390,253)     $(4,607,821)
                                                                           ===========      ===========      ===========
</Table>

NOTE 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

The Partnership is subject to risks incident to potential losses arising from
the management and ownership of improved real estate. The Partnership can also
be affected by poor economic conditions generally, however no more than 24% of
the properties are located in any single state. There are also substantial risks
associated with owning properties receiving government assistance, for example
the possibility that Congress may not appropriate funds to enable HUD to make
rental assistance payments. HUD also restricts annual cash distributions to
partners based on operating results and a percentage of the owners' equity
contribution. The Partnership cannot sell or substantially liquidate its
investments in subsidiary partnerships during the period that the subsidy
agreements are in existence, without HUD's approval. Furthermore there may not
be market demand for apartments at full market rents when the rental assistance
contract expires.

Except as described above, management is not aware of any trends or events,
commitments or uncertainties, which have not otherwise been disclosed, that will
or are likely to impact liquidity in a material way. Management believes the
only impact would be from laws that have not yet been adopted. The portfolio is
diversified by the location of the properties around the

                                      -92-
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          MARCH 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000

United States so that if one area of the country is experiencing downturns in
the economy, the remaining properties in the portfolio may not be affected.
However, the geographic diversification of the portfolio may not protect against
a general downturn in the national economy.

NOTE 10 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                          QUARTER ENDED
                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         JUNE 30, 2001       SEPTEMBER 30, 2001   DECEMBER 31, 2001      MARCH 31, 2002
                         -------------       ------------------   -----------------      --------------
<S>                      <C>                 <C>                  <C>                    <C>
Revenues:
Rental income              $ 3,375,890          $ 3,403,347          $ 3,378,093          $ 3,585,176
Other                          339,617              397,048              379,622              558,233
                           -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------
Total Revenue                3,715,507            3,800,395            3,757,715            4,143,409
                           -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

Net Loss                   $(1,082,148)         $  (902,633)         $  (964,551)         $  (801,838)
                           ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

Number of BACs
   outstanding                  72,896               72,896               72,896               72,896
                           ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

Net loss - limited
   partners                $(1,071,327)         $  (893,606)         $  (954,906)         $  (793,819)
                           ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

<Caption>

                                                      QUARTER ENDED
                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          JUNE 30, 2000     SEPTEMBER 30, 2000    DECEMBER 31, 2000    MARCH 31, 2001
                          -------------     ------------------    -----------------    --------------
<S>                       <C>               <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Revenues:
Rental income             $ 3,328,209          $ 3,294,114          $ 3,311,051          $ 3,406,581
Other                         320,102              377,618              405,911              503,252
                          -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------
Total Revenue               3,648,311            3,671,732            3,716,962            3,909,833
                          -----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

Net Loss                  $(1,063,048)         $  (988,645)         $(1,034,002)         $(3,222,358)
                          ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

Number of BACs
   Outstanding                 72,896               72,896               72,896               72,896
                          ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========

Net loss-limited
   partners               $(1,052,418)         $  (978,759)         $(1,023,662)         $(3,190,135)
                          ===========          ===========          ===========          ===========
</Table>


                                      -93-
<Page>

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
         Financial Disclosure.

None

                                    PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

The Partnership has no directors or executive officers. The Partnership's
affairs are managed and controlled by the General Partners. On November 25,
1997, an affiliate of the Related General Partner purchased 100% of the stock of
the Freedom General Partner. Prior to such purchase the Freedom General Partner
was an affiliate of Lehman Brothers.

Certain information concerning the directors and executive officers of each of
the General Partners is set forth below.

Related Freedom Associates Inc., ("RFAI") is the sole general partner of Related
Freedom Associates L.P.

NAME                                        POSITION
----                                        --------
Stephen M. Ross                             Director

Alan P. Hirmes                              President

Stuart J. Boesky                            Senior Vice President

Marc D. Schnitzer                           Vice President

Denise L. Kiley                             Vice President

Glenn F. Hopps                              Treasurer

Teresa Wicelinski                           Secretary

STEPHEN M. ROSS, 62, is President and a Director and shareholder of The Related
Realty Group, Inc., the general partner of The Related Companies, L.P.
("Related"). He graduated from the University of Michigan School of Business
Administration with a Bachelor of Science degree and from Wayne State University
School of Law with a Juris Doctor degree. Mr. Ross then received a Master of
Laws degree in taxation from New York University School of Law. He joined the
accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand in Detroit as a tax specialist and later
moved to New York, where he worked for two large Wall Street investment banking
firms in their real estate and corporate finance departments. Mr. Ross formed
the predecessor of The Related Companies, L.P. in 1972 to develop, manage,
finance and acquire subsidized and conventional apartment developments. Mr. Ross
also serves on the Board of Directors of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance
Company.

ALAN P. HIRMES, 47, has been a certified public accountant in New York since
1978. Prior to joining Related Capital in October 1983, Mr. Hirmes was employed
by Weiner & Co., certified public accountants. Mr. Hirmes is also a Vice
President of Related. Mr. Hirmes graduated from Hofstra University with a
Bachelor of Arts degree. Mr. Hirmes also serves on the Board of Directors of
Aegis Realty, Inc., Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company and American
Mortgage Acceptance Company.

                                      -94-

<Page>

STUART J. BOESKY, 46, practiced real estate and tax law in New York City with
the law firm of Shipley & Rothstein from 1984 until February 1986 when he joined
Related Capital. From 1983 to 1984, Mr. Boesky practiced law with the Boston law
firm of Kaye, Fialkow, Richard & Rothstein (which subsequently merged with
Strook & Strook & Lavan) and from 1978 to 1980 was a consultant specializing in
real estate at the accounting firm of Laventhol & Horwath. Mr. Boesky graduated
from Michigan State University with a Bachelor of Arts degree and from Wayne
State School of Law with a Juris Doctor degree. He then received a Master of
Laws degree in Taxation from Boston University School of Law. Mr. Boesky also
serves on the Board of Directors of Aegis Realty, Inc., Charter Municipal
Mortgage Acceptance Company and American Mortgage Acceptance Company.

MARC D. SCHNITZER, 41, is responsible both for financial restructurings of real
estate properties and directing Related's acquisition of properties generating
Housing Tax Credits. Mr. Schnitzer received a Masters of Business Administration
from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in December 1987
before joining Related in January 1988. From 1983 to January 1986, he was a
financial analyst for the First Boston Corporation in New York. Mr. Schnitzer
graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
from the School of Management at Boston University in May 1983.

DENISE L. KILEY, 42, is responsible for overseeing the due diligence and asset
management of all multifamily residential properties invested in
Related-sponsored corporate, public and private equity and debt funds. Prior to
joining Related in 1990, Ms. Kiley had experience acquiring, financing and asset
managing multifamily residential properties. From 1981 through 1985 she was an
auditor with PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ms. Kiley holds a Bachelor of Science in
Accounting from Boston College.

GLENN F. HOPPS, 39, joined Related in December, 1990, and prior to that date was
employed by Marks Shron & Company and Weissbarth, Altman and Michaelson,
certified public accountants. Mr. Hopps graduated from New York State University
at Albany with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting.

TERESA WICELINSKI, 36, joined Related in June 1992, and prior to that date was
employed by Friedman, Alpren & Green, certified public accountants. Ms.
Wicelinski graduated from Pace University with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in
Accounting.

THE FREEDOM GENERAL PARTNER

NAME                                                  POSITION
----                                                  --------
Michael Brenner                                       Director

Alan P. Hirmes                                        President

Stuart J. Boesky                                      Executive Vice President

Marc D. Schnitzer                                     Vice President

Denise L. Kiley                                       Vice President

Glenn F. Hopps                                        Treasurer

Teresa Wicelinski                                     Secretary

                                      -95-

<Page>


MICHAEL BRENNER, 56, is a Director of Aegis, and is the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of The Related Companies, L.P. ("TRCLP"). Prior to
joining TRCLP in 1996, Mr. Brenner was a partner with Coopers & Lybrand, having
served as managing partner of its Industry Programs and Client Satisfaction
initiatives from 1993-1996, managing partner of the Detroit group of offices
from 1986-1993 and Chairman of its National Real Estate Industry Group from
1984-1986. Mr. Brenner graduated summa cum laude from the University of Detroit
with a Bachelors degree in Business Administration and from the University of
Michigan with a Masters of Business Administration, with distinction. Mr.
Brenner also serves on the Board of Directors of Charter Municipal Mortgage
Acceptance Company and Aegis Realty, Inc.

Biographical information with respect to Messrs. Hirmes, Boesky, Schnitzer,
Hopps, Ms. Kiley and Ms. Wicelinski is set forth above.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation.

The Partnership has no officers or directors. The Partnership does not pay or
accrue any fees, salaries or other forms of compensation to directors or
officers of the General Partners for their services. However, under the terms of
the Partnership Agreement , the General Partners and their affiliates are
entitled to receive compensation from the Partnership in consideration of
certain services rendered to the Partnership by such parties. In addition, the
General Partners collectively hold a 1% interest in all profits, losses and
distributions attributable to operations and a subordinated 15% interest in such
items attributable to sales and refinancings. Certain directors and officers of
the General Partners receive compensation from the General Partner and their
affiliates for services performed for various affiliated entities which may
include services performed for the Partnership.

Freedom SLP L.P., an affiliate of the General Partners, has either a .01% or 1%
interest, as a special limited partner, in each of the Local Partnerships.

The General Partners and their affiliates perform services for the Partnership.
The costs incurred are as follows:

a)  Due to Local General Partners and Affiliates

At March 31, 2002 and 2001, a majority of the following fees were incurred in
connection with the development of the property and have been included in the
basis of the building.

Due to local general partners and affiliates at March 31, 2002 and 2001 consists
of the following:
<Table>
<Caption>

                                       2002            2001
                                    ----------      ----------
<S>                                 <C>             <C>
Operating advances                  $1,499,261      $1,299,582
Development fees                     1,503,774       1,512,459
Due to contractor                            0         114,620
Operating deficit loans                319,638         319,638
Management and other fees              497,260         377,317
                                    ----------      ----------

                                    $3,819,933      $3,623,616
                                    ==========      ==========
</Table>

                                      -96-

<Page>

b)  Other Expenses

The costs incurred to related parties for the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000 were as follows:
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                         YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                              ------------------------------------------
                                                 2002             2001           2000
                                              ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>             <C>
Partnership management fees (a)               $  676,000      $  676,000      $  676,000
Expense reimbursement (b)                        118,659         243,998         179,194
Local administrative fee (d)                      53,000          53,000          52,500
                                              ----------      ----------      ----------
Total general and administrative-
  General Partners                               847,659         972,998         907,694
                                              ----------      ----------      ----------
Property management fees
  incurred to affiliates of the
  subsidiary partnerships'
  general partners (c)                           760,856         655,511         628,222
                                              ----------      ----------      ----------
Total general and administrative-
  related parties                             $1,608,515      $1,628,509      $1,535,916
                                              ==========      ==========      ==========
</Table>


(a) The General Partners are entitled to receive a partnership management fee,
after payment of all Partnership expenses, which together with the annual local
administrative fees will not exceed a maximum of 0.5% per annum of Invested
Assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement), for administering the affairs
of the Partnership. Subject to the foregoing limitation, the partnership
management fee will be determined by the General Partners in their sole
discretion based upon their review of the Partnership's investment. Unpaid
partnership management fees for any year will be accrued without interest and
will be payable from working capital reserves or to the extent of available
funds after the Partnership has made distributions to the Limited Partners and
BACs holders of sale or refinancing proceeds equal to their original capital
contributions plus a 10% priority return thereon (to the extent not theretofore
paid out of Cash Flow). Partnership management fees owed to General Partners
amounting to approximately $4,856,000 and $4,180,000 were accrued and unpaid as
of March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Without the General Partners continued
accrual without payment, the Partnership will not be in a position to meet its
obligations. The General Partners have continued allowing the accrual without
payment of these amounts, but are under no obligation to continue to do so. The
Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partner and certain of
its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership level. The
General Partner and these affiliates have agreed to continue such support for
the foreseeable future.

(b) The Partnership reimburses the General Partners and their affiliates for
actual Partnership operating expenses incurred by the General Partners and their
affiliates on the Partnership's behalf. The amount of reimbursement from the
Partnership is limited by the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. Another
affiliate of the General Partners performs asset monitoring for the Partnership.
These services include site visits and evaluations of the subsidiary
partnerships' performance.

(c) Property management fees incurred by subsidiary partnerships amounted to
$1,051,546, $1,007,077 and $984,438 for the 2002, 2001 and 2000 Fiscal Years,
respectively. Of these fees $760,856, $655,511 and $628,222 were incurred to
affiliates of the subsidiary partnerships.

(d) Freedom SLP L.P., a special limited partner of the subsidiary partnerships,
is entitled to receive an annual local administrative fee of up to $2,500 from
each subsidiary partnership.

                                      -97-

<Page>


Tabular information concerning salaries, bonuses and other types of compensation
payable to executive officers has not been included in this annual report. As
noted above, the Partnership has no executive officers. The levels of
compensation payable to the General Partners and/or their affiliates is limited
by the terms of the Partnership Agreement and may not be increased therefrom on
a discretionary basis.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

<Table>
<Caption>

                             NAME AND ADDRESS OF              AMOUNT AND NATURE OF                 PERCENTAGE
TITLE OF CLASS               BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP             BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP                   OF CLASS
--------------               --------------------             --------------------                 ----------
<S>                          <C>                              <C>                                  <C>
General Partnership          Related Freedom                  $1,000 capital contribution              50%
Interest in the              Associates L.P.                  -directly owned
Partnership                  625 Madison Avenue
                             New York, NY 10022

General Partnership          Freedom GP Inc.                  $1,000 capital contribution              50%
Interest in the              625 Madison Avenue               -directly owned
Partnership                  New York, NY 10022
</Table>

Freedom SLP L.P., a limited partnership whose general partners are the General
Partners of the Partnership and which acts as the special limited partner of
each Local Partnership, holds a 1% limited partnership interest in each Local
Partnership.

Except as set forth below, no person (other than the Assignor Limited Partner)
was known by the Partnership to be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent of the Limited Partnership Interests and/or BACs and neither the General
Partners nor any director or officer of the General Partners owns any Limited
Partnership Interests or BACs.
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                            AMOUNT AND NATURE OF                PERCENTAGE
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER                                    BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP                 OF CLASS
------------------------                                    --------------------                ----------
<S>                                                         <C>                                 <C>
Lehigh Tax Credit Partners, Inc.                            8,375.66 (2) (3)                        11.5%
J. Michael Fried                                            8,375.66 (2) (3) (4)                    11.5%
Alan P. Hirmes                                              8,375.66 (2) (3) (4)                    11.5%
Stuart J. Boesky                                            8,375.66 (2) (3) (4)                    11.5%
Stephen M. Ross                                                          -                           -
Marc D. Schnitzer                                                        -                           -
Denise L. Kiley                                                          -                           -
Glenn F. Hopps                                                           -                           -
All directors and executive officers of RFAI                8,375.66 (2) (3) (4)                    11.5%
and The Freedom General Partner as a
group (eight persons)
</Table>

(1) The address for each of the persons in the table is 625 Madison Avenue, New
York, New York 10022.

(2) As set forth in schedule 13D filed by the Partnership, Lehigh Tax Credit
L.L.C. (Lehigh) and Lehigh Tax Credit Partners, Inc. (the "Managing Member") on
October 24, 1997 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")
and pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 26, 1997 among the Partnership,
Lehigh and Related Freedom Associates L.P. ("RFA") (the "Standstill Agreement"),
Lehigh agreed that, prior to August 26, 2007 (the "Standstill Expiration Date"),
it will not and it will cause certain affiliates (including Lehigh Tax Credit
Partners II, LLC ("Lehigh II")), not to (i) acquire, attempt to acquire or make
a proposal to acquire, di-

                                      -98-
<Page>

rectly or indirectly, more than 45% (including BACs acquired through all other
means) of the outstanding BACs, (ii) seek to propose to enter into, directly or
indirectly, any merger, consolidation, business combination, sale or acquisition
of assets, liquidation, dissolution or other similar transaction involving the
Partnership, (iii) make, or in any way participate, directly or indirectly, in
any "solicitation" of "proxies" or "consents" (as such terms are used in the
proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")) to
vote any voting securities of the Partnership, (iv) form, join or otherwise
participate in a "group" (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Act)
with respect to any voting securities of the Partnership, except that those
affiliates bound by the Standstill Agreement will not be deemed to have violated
it and formed a "group" solely by acting in accordance with the Standstill
Agreement, (v) disclose in writing to any third party any intention, plan or
arrangement inconsistent with the terms of the Standstill Agreement, or (vi)
loan money to, advise, assist or encourage any person in connection with any
action inconsistent with the terms of the Standstill Agreement. In addition,
Lehigh agreed that until the Standstill Expiration Date it will not sell any
BACs acquired by it unless the buyer of such BACs agrees to be bound by the
Standstill Agreement; provided, however, Lehigh may make transfers in the
secondary market to any purchaser which represents that following such sale it
will not own three (3%) percent or more of the BACs outstanding. By the terms of
the Standstill Agreement, Lehigh also agreed to vote its BACs in the same manner
as a majority of all voting BACs holders; provided, however, Lehigh is entitled
to vote its BACs as it determines with regard to any proposal (i) to remove RFA
as a general partner of the Partnership or (ii) concerning the reduction of any
fees, profits, distributions or allocations for the benefit of RFA or its
affiliates. The discussion herein of the Standstill Agreement is subject to and
qualified in its entirety by reference to such agreement, a copy of which is
attached hereto as an exhibit and incorporated herein by reference.

(3) As of May 22, 2002, Lehigh held 4,192.83 BACs and Lehigh II held 4,182.83
BACs which constitutes approximately 11.5% of the outstanding BACs owned.

(4) Each such party serves as a director and executive officer of the Managing
Member and owns an equity interest therein, except J. Michael Fried who owns
only an economic interest.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

The Partnership has and will continue to have certain relationships with the
General Partners and their affiliates, as discussed in Item 11 which is
incorporated herein by reference thereto. However, there have been no direct
financial transactions between the Partnership and the directors and officers of
the General Partners.



                                      -99-
<Page>


                                     PART IV
<Table>
<Caption>

Item 14.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
                                                                                  SEQUENTIAL
                                                                                     PAGE
                                                                                  ----------
<S>                                                                               <C>
(a) 1.      Financial Statements

            Independent Auditors' Reports                                             18

            Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2002 and 2001                 79

            Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
            March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000                                             80

            Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital
            (Deficit) for the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000               81

            Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
            March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000                                             82

            Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                84

(a) 2.      FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

            Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant               105

            Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation                  108
</Table>
            All other schedules have been omitted because they are not
            required or because the required information is contained in
            the financial statements or notes thereto.

(a) 3.      EXHIBITS

(3A)        The Partnership's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
            Partnership, incorporated herein as an exhibit by reference to
            Exhibit A to the Partnership's Prospectus, dated February 9,
            1990, as supplemented by supplements thereto dated December 7,
            1990, May 10, 1991, July 10, 1991 and July 23, 1991 (as so
            supplemented, the "Prospectus"), filed with the Securities and
            Exchange Commission on July 30, 1992, as part of
            Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Partnership's
            registration statement on Form S-11, File No. 33-30859
            ("Post-Effective Amendment No. 6")

(3B)        The Partnership's Certificate of Limited Partnership, as filed
            with Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 28,
            1989, incorporated herein as an exhibit by reference to
            Exhibit (3C) to the Partnership's registration statement on
            Form S-11, File No. 33-30859, as filed with the Securities and
            Exchange Commission on September 1, 1989 (the "Initial S-11")

(10A)       Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated herein as an
            exhibit by reference to Exhibit B to the Prospectus as filed
            as part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 6

                                     -100-
<Page>

Item 14.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
            (continued)
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                  SEQUENTIAL
                                                                                     PAGE
                                                                                  ----------
<S>                                                                               <C>
(10B)       Form of Purchase and Sale Agreement pertaining to the
            Partnership's acquisition of Local Partnership Interests,
            incorporated herein as an exhibit by reference to Exhibit
            (10C) to the Initial S-11

(10C)       Form of Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
            of Local Partnerships, incorporated herein as an exhibit by
            reference to Exhibit (10D) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
            the Partnership's registration statement on Form S-11, File
            No. 33-30859, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on December 21, 1989

(21)        Subsidiaries of the Registrant                                            102

(b)         REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter.
</Table>


                                     -101-
<Page>

Item 14.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
           (continued)
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                  JURISDICTION
(c)        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT (Exhibit 21)                          OF ORGANIZATION
           ------------------------------                                       ---------------
<S>                                                                            <C>
           Parkside Townhomes Associates                                           PA
           Twin Trees Apartments                                                   UT
           Bennion Park Apartments (Mulberry)                                      UT
           Hunters Chase Apartments                                                AL
           Wilshire Park Apartments                                                AL
           Bethel Park Apartments                                                  OH
           Zebulon Park Apartments                                                 OH
           Tivoli Place Apartments                                                 TN
           Northwood  Apartments of Georgia                                        FL
           Oxford Trace Apartments                                                 SC
           Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership                                  UT
           Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership                                 NY
           C.H. Development Group Associates (Manhattan B)                         NY
           Davidson Court Limited Partnership                                      NY
           Magnolia Mews Limited Partnership                                       PA
           The Oaks Village Limited Partnership                                    NC
           Greenfield Village Limited Partnership                                  NC
           CLM Equities Limited Partnership (Morris Avenue)                        NY
           Victoria Manor Associates                                               CA
           Ogontz Hall Investors                                                   PA
           Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership                                         WI
           Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership                  NY
           Conifer Irondequoit Associates (Abraham Lincoln)                        NY
           Middletown Associates (Wilson Street)                                   PA
           Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd.                                       FL
           Flipper Temple Associates Limited Partnership                           GA
           220 Cooper Street Associates Limited Partnership                        NJ
           Pecan Creek                                                             OK
           363 Grand Vendome Associates Limited Partnership                        NY
           New Augusta Ltd. (Rainer Villas)                                        AL
           Pine Shadow Apartments                                                  AL
           Windsor Place Apartments                                                AL
           Brookwood Apartments, Ltd.                                              AL
           Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.                                           AL
           Shadowood Apts., Ltd.                                                   AL
           Brittany Associates, Ltd.                                               MS
           Hidden Valley Apartments                                                AL
           Westbrook Square Limited Partnership                                    MS
           Warsaw Elderly Housing Ltd. (Royal Pines Apts.)                         KY
           West Hill Square Apts., Ltd.                                            AL
           Elmwood Associates                                                      MS
           Harmony Gate Associates                                                 CA
</Table>

                                     -102-

<Page>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.

                                 By: RELATED FREEDOM ASSOCIATES L.P.
                                     a general partner


                                     By: RELATED FREEDOM ASSOCIATES INC.
                                         a general partner

Date:  June 25, 2002

                                     By: /s/ Alan P. Hirmes
                                         ------------------
                                         Alan P. Hirmes,
                                         President



                                 By: FREEDOM GP INC.
                                     a general partner

Date:  June 25, 2002

                                     By:  /s/ Alan P. Hirmes
                                          ------------------
                                          Alan. P. Hirmes,
                                          President

<Page>

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
by the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
<Table>
<Caption>

     SIGNATURE                                        TITLE                                      DATE
-----------------------           -----------------------------------------------------       -------------
<S>                               <C>                                                         <C>
                                  President (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
/s/ Alan P. Hirmes                of Related Freedom Associates, Inc.
------------------
Alan P. Hirmes                    and Freedom GP Inc.                                         June 25, 2002


                                  Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Glenn F. Hopps                of Related Freedom Associates, Inc.
------------------
Glenn F. Hopps                    and Freedom GP Inc.                                         June 25, 2002


                                  Director of Related
/s/ Stephen M. Ross               Freedom Associates, Inc.
-------------------
Stephen M. Ross                                                                               June 25, 2002
</Table>

<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.

                                   SCHEDULE I

                  CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

Summarized condensed financial information of registrant (not including
consolidated subsidiary partnerships)

                            CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

                                     ASSETS
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                             MARCH 31,
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                        2002           2001
                                                   -----------      -----------
<S>                                                <C>              <C>
Cash and cash equivalents                          $    21,177      $    38,850
Investment in subsidiary partnerships,
   carried on an equity basis                       15,246,156       18,089,411
                                                   -----------      -----------

Total assets                                       $15,267,333      $18,128,261
                                                   ===========      ===========

<Caption>

                        LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL

<S>                                                <C>              <C>
Due to general partner and affiliates              $ 5,609,252      $ 4,714,509
Accounts payable and other liabilities                  52,099           56,600
                                                   -----------      -----------

Total liabilities                                    5,661,351        4,771,109

Partners' capital                                    9,605,982       13,357,152
                                                   -----------      -----------

Total liabilities and partners' capital            $15,267,333      $18,128,261
                                                   ===========      ===========
</Table>

<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.

                                   SCHEDULE I

                  CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

                       CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                     YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                       -----------------------------------------------
                                                            2002             2001               2000
                                                       -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>               <C>
Income

Other income                                           $    10,245       $       956       $     7,915
                                                       -----------       -----------       -----------

Expenses

Equity in losses of subsidiary partnerships              2,839,620         5,263,891         3,718,137
General and administrative                                  74,136            72,121           116,848
General and administrative-related parties                 847,659           972,998           907,694
                                                       -----------       -----------       -----------

Total Expenses                                           3,761,415         6,309,010         4,742,679
                                                       -----------       -----------       -----------

Net loss                                               $(3,751,170)      $(6,308,054)      $(4,734,764)
                                                       ===========       ===========       ===========
</Table>

<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                                   SCHEDULE I
                  CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

                       CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                 YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                  -----------------------------------------------
                                                                      2002              2001             2000
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net loss                                                          $(3,751,170)      $(6,308,054)      $(4,734,764)
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
   operating activities:

   Equity in losses of subsidiary partnerships                      2,839,620         5,263,891         3,718,137

   Write-off of organizational costs                                        0                 0            69,652

   Increase (decrease) in liabilities:

   Due to general partner and affiliates                              894,743           932,453           855,950
   Accounts payable and other liabilities                              (4,501)            8,089             2,203
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------

   Total adjustments                                                3,729,862         6,204,433         4,645,942
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------

Net cash used in operating activities                                 (21,308)         (103,621)          (88,822)
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------

Cash flows from investing activities:

Distributions from subsidiaries                                         3,635            26,797            24,406
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                             (17,673)          (76,824)          (64,416)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                           38,850           115,674           180,090
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                            $    21,177       $    38,850       $   115,674
                                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========
</Table>

<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                                  SCHEDULE III
                    REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
                                 MARCH 31, 2002
<Table>
<Caption>


                                            INITIAL COST TO PARTNERSHIP     COST      PURCHASE PRICE
                                            --------------------------- CAPITALIZED   ADJUSTMENTS(B)
                                                         BUILDINGS AND  SUBSEQUENT TO  BUILDINGS AND
DESCRIPTION                  ENCUMBRANCES        LAND     IMPROVEMENTS   ACQUISITION    IMPROVEMENTS
-----------                  ------------   -----------  -------------  ------------- --------------
<S>                          <C>            <C>          <C>            <C>           <C>
Properties:

Parkside Townhouses
  York, PA                   $  1,626,764  $    263,231  $  4,439,564   $     51,289   $          0
Twin Trees
  Layton, UT                    1,139,661       112,401     2,668,179        159,886        (47,642)
Bennion (Mulberry)
  Taylorsville, UT              2,170,223       258,000     4,934,447        597,337        (22,842)
Hunters Chase
  Madison, AL                   2,498,758       411,100     5,616,330     (1,523,295)      (713,028)
Bethel Park
  Bethel, OH                    1,913,390       141,320     5,365,882        340,502       (846,229)
Zebulon Park
  Owensville, OH                1,608,815       165,000     4,187,880        291,894       (542,936)
Tivoli Place
  Murphreesboro, TN             1,533,477       267,500     4,146,759        291,908       (207,625)
Northwood
  Jacksonville, FL              2,769,539       494,900     6,630,321        386,345       (294,886)
Oxford Trace
  Aiken, SC                       716,209       162,000     1,725,512       (630,117)      (161,049)
Wilshire
  Huntsville, AL                1,713,328       178,497     4,014,281       (890,102)      (432,405)
Ivanhoe
  Salt Lake City, UT              465,122        41,000     1,136,915         33,554              0
Washington Avenue
  Brooklyn, NY                          0        42,485     2,843,351         73,904              0
C.H. Development
  (Manhattan B)
  New York, NY                  1,555,937             3     3,294,688         46,902              0
Davidson Court
  Staten Island, NY                     0        96,892       773,052         37,064              0
Magnolia Mews
  Philadelphia, PA              1,680,087       200,000       668,007      2,341,180              0
Oaks Village
  Whiteville, NC                1,460,246        63,548     1,799,849        192,215              0
Greenfield Village
  Dunn, NC                      1,469,179        78,296     1,806,126        158,113              0
Morris Avenue
  (CLM Equities)
  Bronx, NY                     2,397,993             2     4,767,049        304,306              0
Victoria Manor
  Riverside, CA                 2,426,598       615,000     5,340,962       (153,198)             0

<Caption>

                                      GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH                                                       LIFE ON WHICH
                                     CARRIED AT CLOSE OF PERIOD                                                   DEPRECIATION IN
                             ---------------------------------------                     YEAR OF                  LATEST INCOME
                                           BUILDINGS AND                ACCUMULATED    CONSTRUCTION/    DATE      STATEMENTS ARE
DESCRIPTION                        LAND     IMPROVEMENTS    TOTAL(A)    DEPRECIATION    RENOVATION    ACQUIRED    COMPUTED(C)(D)
-----------                  ------------  --------------   --------    ------------   -------------  --------    ---------------
<S>                          <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>              <C>          <C>          <C>
Properties:

Parkside Townhouses
  York, PA                   $    265,796   $ 4,488,288    $4,754,084  $  1,833,866          1989    Sept. 1990          27.5
Twin Trees
  Layton, UT                      115,125     2,777,699     2,892,824     1,243,653          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Bennion (Mulberry)
  Taylorsville, UT                260,565     5,506,377     5,766,942     2,515,520          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Hunters Chase
  Madison, AL                     413,665     3,377,442     3,791,107     2,322,008          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Bethel Park
  Bethel, OH                      143,885     4,857,590     5,001,475     2,336,936          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Zebulon Park
  Owensville, OH                  167,565     3,934,273     4,101,838     1,829,416          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Tivoli Place
  Murphreesboro, TN               270,065     4,228,477     4,498,542     1,920,927          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Northwood
  Jacksonville, FL                497,465     6,719,215     7,216,680     3,048,938          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Oxford Trace
  Aiken, SC                       164,564       931,782     1,096,346       741,137          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Wilshire
  Huntsville, AL                  181,060     2,689,211     2,870,271     1,539,684          1989     Oct. 1990          27.5
Ivanhoe
  Salt Lake City, UT               42,677     1,168,792     1,211,469       434,313          1991     Jan. 1991          27.5
Washington Avenue
  Brooklyn, NY                     44,162     2,915,578     2,959,740     1,029,379          1991     Jan. 1991          27.5
C.H. Development
  (Manhattan B)
  New York, NY                      1,680     3,339,913     3,341,593     1,544,401          1991     Jan. 1991          27.5
Davidson Court
  Staten Island, NY                98,569       808,439       907,008       277,216          1991     Mar. 1991          27.5
Magnolia Mews
  Philadelphia, PA                201,677     3,007,510     3,209,187     1,083,203          1991     Mar. 1991          27.5
Oaks Village
  Whiteville, NC                   65,225     1,990,387     2,055,612       803,619          1991     Mar. 1991          27.5
Greenfield Village
  Dunn, NC                         79,973     1,962,562     2,042,535       787,500          1991     Mar. 1991         127.5
Morris Avenue
  (CLM Equities)
  Bronx, NY                         1,679     5,069,678     5,071,357     1,938,158          1991     Apr. 1991          27.5
Victoria Manor
  Riverside, CA                   616,677     5,186,087     5,802,764     2,001,541          1991     Apr. 1991          27.5
</Table>
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                                  SCHEDULE III
                    REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
                                 MARCH 31, 2002
<Table>
<Caption>


                                            INITIAL COST TO PARTNERSHIP     COST      PURCHASE PRICE
                                            --------------------------- CAPITALIZED   ADJUSTMENTS(B)
                                                         BUILDINGS AND  SUBSEQUENT TO  BUILDINGS AND
DESCRIPTION                  ENCUMBRANCES        LAND     IMPROVEMENTS   ACQUISITION    IMPROVEMENTS
-----------                  ------------   -----------  -------------  ------------- --------------
<S>                          <C>            <C>          <C>            <C>           <C>
Ogontz Hallz
  Philadelphia, PA              1,961,562             0       328,846      3,339,876              0
Eagle Ridge
  Stoughton, WI                 1,564,692       321,594     2,627,385         76,706              0
Nelson Anderson
  Bronx, NY                     3,537,113             2     6,524,096         66,467              0
Conifer Irondequoit
  (Abraham Lincoln)
  Irondequoit, NY               2,852,201        20,000     5,407,108         96,415              0
Wilson Street Apts
  (Middletown)
  Middletown, PA                1,673,496        38,449             0      3,398,281              0
Lauderdale Lakes
  Lauderdale Lakes, FL          4,937,364       873,973     3,976,744      5,513,880              0
Flipper Temple
  Atlanta, GA                   2,549,050        70,519     4,907,110        699,720              0
220 Cooper Street
  Camden, NJ                      971,375        41,000             0      3,662,349              0
Vendome
  Brooklyn, NY                  2,621,002        12,000     4,867,584        220,536              0
Pecan Creek
  Tulsa, OK                       999,867        50,000     1,484,923        168,852              0
New Augusta Ltd.
  (Rainer Villas)87,776
  New Augusta, AL                 711,895        15,000       939,681         87,776              0
Pine Shadow Apts
  Waveland, MS                  1,628,865        74,550     2,117,989        158,826              0
Windsor Place Apts
  Wedowee, AL                     759,720        40,000       904,888         47,249              0
Brookwood Apts
  Foley, AL                     1,258,598        68,675     1,517,190         62,168              0
Heflin Hills Apts
  Heflin, AL                      737,693        50,000       841,300         44,171              0
Shadowood Apts
  Stevenson, AL                   741,165        27,000       898,800          6,568              0
Brittany Associates
  DeKalb, MS                      683,610        20,000       843,592         22,329              0
Hidden Valley Apts
  Brewton, AL                   1,243,891        68,000     1,637,840         63,973              0
Westbrook Square L.P.
  Carthage, MS                  1,020,244        40,000     1,254,957         21,429              0
Warsaw Elderly Housing Ltd.
  Warsaw, KY                    1,131,080        98,819     1,333,606          6,247              0
West Hill Square Apts. Ltd.
  Gordo, AL                       764,345        60,000       954,020         22,637              0

<Caption>

                                      GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH                                                       LIFE ON WHICH
                                     CARRIED AT CLOSE OF PERIOD                                                   DEPRECIATION IN
                             ---------------------------------------                     YEAR OF                  LATEST INCOME
                                           BUILDINGS AND                ACCUMULATED    CONSTRUCTION/    DATE      STATEMENTS ARE
DESCRIPTION                        LAND     IMPROVEMENTS    TOTAL(A)    DEPRECIATION    RENOVATION    ACQUIRED    COMPUTED(C)(D)
-----------                  ------------  --------------   --------    ------------   -------------  --------    ---------------
<S>                          <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>              <C>          <C>          <C>
Ogontz Hallz
  Philadelphia, PA                  1,677     3,667,045     3,668,722     1,318,415          1990     Apr. 1991          27.5
Eagle Ridge
  Stoughton, WI                   323,271     2,702,414     3,025,685     1,342,471          1991      May 1991          27.5
Nelson Anderson
  Bronx, NY                         1,679     6,588,886     6,590,565     2,453,394          1991     June 1991          27.5
Conifer Irondequoit
  (Abraham Lincoln)
  Irondequoit, NY                  21,677     5,501,846     5,523,523     2,119,642          1991    Sept. 1991          27.5
Wilson Street Apts
  (Middletown)
  Middletown, PA                   40,126     3,396,604     3,436,730     1,203,393          1991    Sept. 1991          27.5
Lauderdale Lakes
  Lauderdale Lakes, FL            875,668     9,488,929    10,364,597     2,484,220          1991     Oct. 1991            40
Flipper Temple
  Atlanta, GA                      72,196     5,605,153     5,677,349     1,894,720          1991     Oct. 1991          27.5
220 Cooper Street
  Camden, NJ                       42,677     3,660,672     3,703,349     1,358,661          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Vendome
  Brooklyn, NY                     13,677     5,086,443     5,100,120     2,465,176          1991     Dec. 1991            20
Pecan Creek
  Tulsa, OK                        50,161     1,653,614     1,703,775       514,878          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
New Augusta Ltd.
  (Rainer Villas)87,776
  New Augusta, AL                  15,161     1,027,296     1,042,457       286,958          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Pine Shadow Apts
  Waveland, MS                     74,711     2,276,654     2,351,365       786,724          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Windsor Place Apts
  Wedowee, AL                      40,161       951,976       992,137       270,338          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Brookwood Apts
  Foley, AL                        68,836     1,579,197     1,648,033       468,272          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Heflin Hills Apts
  Heflin, AL                       50,161       885,310       935,471       269,399          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Shadowood Apts
  Stevenson, AL                    27,161       905,207       932,368       268,591          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Brittany Associates
  DeKalb, MS                       20,161       865,760       885,921       257,015          1990     Dec. 1991          27.5
Hidden Valley Apts
  Brewton, AL                      68,161     1,701,652     1,769,813       504,395          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Westbrook Square L.P.
  Carthage, MS                     40,161     1,276,225     1,316,386       377,333          1990     Dec. 1991          27.5
Warsaw Elderly Housing Ltd.
  Warsaw, KY                       98,980     1,339,692     1,438,672       370,129          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
West Hill Square Apts. Ltd.
  Gordo, AL                        60,161       976,496     1,036,657       281,872          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
</Table>
<Page>

                          FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS
                                  SCHEDULE III
                    REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
                                 MARCH 31, 2002
<Table>
<Caption>

                                            INITIAL COST TO PARTNERSHIP     COST      PURCHASE PRICE
                                            --------------------------- CAPITALIZED   ADJUSTMENTS(B)
                                                         BUILDINGS AND  SUBSEQUENT TO  BUILDINGS AND
DESCRIPTION                  ENCUMBRANCES        LAND     IMPROVEMENTS   ACQUISITION    IMPROVEMENTS
-----------                  ------------   -----------  -------------  ------------- --------------
<S>                          <C>            <C>          <C>            <C>           <C>
Elmwood Assoc
  Picayune, MS                    704,365        81,500       829,183         19,671              0
Harmony Gate Assoc
  Los Angeles, CA               3,864,708             0     9,757,807         27,490              0
                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                              $68,063,227    $5,662,256  $120,113,803    $19,943,303    $(3,268,642)
                             =======================================================================

<Caption>

                                   GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH                                                       LIFE ON WHICH
                                  CARRIED AT CLOSE OF PERIOD                                                   DEPRECIATION IN
                            -------------------------------------                     YEAR OF                  LATEST INCOME
                                        BUILDINGS AND                ACCUMULATED    CONSTRUCTION/    DATE      STATEMENTS ARE
DESCRIPTION                     LAND     IMPROVEMENTS    TOTAL(A)    DEPRECIATION    RENOVATION    ACQUIRED    COMPUTED(C)(D)
-----------                 ----------  --------------   --------    ------------   -------------  --------    ---------------
<S>                         <C>         <C>             <C>         <C>              <C>          <C>          <C>
Elmwood Assoc
  Picayune, MS                  81,661       848,693       930,354       234,444          1991     Dec. 1991          27.5
Harmony Gate Assoc
  Los Angeles, CA                  161     9,785,136     9,785,297     3,416,298          1992     Jan. 1992          27.5
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            $5,720,520  $136,730,200  $142,450,720   $54,178,153
                            ====================================================
</Table>

(A)  Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes, $146,576,191.
(B)  Rental guarantees and development deficit guarantees for GAAP purposes are
     treated as a reduction of the asset.
(C)  Furniture and fixtures, included with buildings and improvements, are
     depreciated primarily by the straight line method over the estimated useful
     lives ranging from 5 to 7 years.
(D)  Since all properties were acquired as operating properties, depreciation is
     computed using primarily the straight line method over the estimated useful
     lives determined by the Partnership from date of acquisition.
(E)  Reconciliation of Real Estate owned:

<Table>
<Caption>

                                        COST OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT                      ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
                                ---------------------------------------------      --------------------------------------------
                                                                     YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     2002            2000             1999             2002            2000             1999
                                ------------    ------------     ------------      -----------     -----------      -----------
<S>                             <C>             <C>              <C>               <C>             <C>              <C>
Balance at beginning of year    $141,678,599    $142,977,169     $142,723,550      $49,344,006     $44,409,197      $39,508,462
Additions during year:
Improvements                         772,121         772,704          758,517
Dispositions                               0          (6,274)          (4,898)               0          (4,596)          (4,898)
Depreciation expense                                                                 4,834,147       4,939,405        4,905,633
Loss on impairment of asset                0      (2,065,000)        (500,000)
                                ------------    ------------     ------------      -----------     -----------      -----------

Balance at close of year        $142,450,720    $141,678,599     $142,977,169      $54,178,153     $49,344,006      $44,409,197
                                ============    ============     ============      ===========     ===========      ===========
</Table>

At the time the local partnerships were acquired by Freedom Tax Credit Plus
L.P., the entire purchase price paid by Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. was pushed
down to the local partnerships as property and equipment with an offsetting
credit to capital. Since the projects were in the construction phase at the time
of acquisition, the capital accounts were insignificant at the time of purchase.
Therefore, there are no material differences between the original cost basis for
tax and GAAP.