alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 702 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 702

Celebrating the contributions of small businesses and entrepreneurs in 
 every community in the United States during ``National Small Business 
            Week'', beginning on May 1 through May 7, 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2016

Mr. Chabot (for himself, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. King of Iowa, Ms. Judy Chu 
  of California, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Ms. Hahn, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Payne, Mr. 
 Huelskamp, Ms. Meng, Mr. Gibson, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Brat, Mr. Takai, 
  Mrs. Radewagen, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Knight, Ms. Adams, Mr. 
 Curbelo of Florida, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, 
Mr. Tipton, and Mr. Cardenas) submitted the following resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Celebrating the contributions of small businesses and entrepreneurs in 
 every community in the United States during ``National Small Business 
            Week'', beginning on May 1 through May 7, 2016.

Whereas ``National Small Business Week'' has been declared by every President 
        since 1963;
Whereas there are more than 28,000,000 small businesses in the United States;
Whereas small businesses represent 99.7 percent of all businesses with employees 
        in the United States;
Whereas small businesses employ over 48 percent of the employees in the private 
        sector in the United States;
Whereas nearly 90 percent of United States employers have less than 20 
        employees;
Whereas small businesses constitute 98 percent of firms exporting goods;
Whereas small businesses are responsible for more than 46 percent of private 
        sector output;
Whereas small businesses are responsible for creating 63 percent of new jobs; 
        and
Whereas May 1, 2016, through May 7, 2016, will be celebrated as ``National Small 
        Business Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) celebrates the contributions of small businesses and 
        entrepreneurs in every community in the United States during 
        ``National Small Business Week'';
            (2) supports the designation of ``National Small Business 
        Week'';
            (3) recognizes the importance of creating policies which 
        promote an environment in which small businesses may succeed; 
        and
            (4) supports efforts to--
                    (A) encourage consumers to utilize small 
                businesses; and
                    (B) increase awareness of the value of small 
                businesses and the impact small businesses have on the 
                economy of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending May 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donovan Chin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

By: /S/ Donovan ChinDonovan ChinChief Financial OfficerJune 17, 2008
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

      Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

This 14th day of November, 2003.

/s/ R. Daniel Blanton
---------------------
R. Daniel Blanton
President &
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)


/s/ Ronald L. Thigpen
----------------------
Ronald L. Thigpen
Executive Vice President &
Chief Operating Officer
(Principal financial officer)


<PAGE>
1

The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3397

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

James Edward Gibson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 6, 2003

 Filed: March 10, 2003 

___________

Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, MURPHY, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Gibson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 500 grams or

more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, and measurable amounts of cocaine

and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(C), and

(b)(1)(D). The district court1

 found that Gibson was responsible for over 5 grams of

actual methamphetamine, and sentenced him to 262 months imprisonment and 8 years

supervised release. 
-2-

On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the district court erred in its drug-quantity

calculation. Gibson has filed a pro se supplemental brief, also challenging the drugquantity calculation. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude there was

no clear error. See United States v. Santana, 150 F.3d 860, 864 (8th Cir. 1998)

(standard of review). In his plea agreement Gibson stipulated that he was responsible

for 27.18 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine; at his sentencing hearing

a former state criminalist testified that, following laboratory protocol, she had thrice

tested a single sample of the methamphetamine and had found an average purity of

20%; and even factoring in the laboratory’s 5% margin of error, the stipulated

quantity of methamphetamine mixture would yield more than 5 grams of actual

methamphetamine. 

We have further reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We

also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2018427EN.01000401.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gliwicach (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2018 — Lebopoll Logistics Sp. z o.o. w Sośnicowicach v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Zabrzu

(Case C-437/18)

(2018/C 427/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Gliwicach

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lebopoll Logistics Sp. z o.o. w Sośnicowicach

Defendant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Zabrzu

Question referred

Should the term ‘residence’ be interpreted in accordance with Article 1(j) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council and with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council, or does the term ‘residence’ also mean temporary residence within the meaning of Article 1(k) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2009 L 284, p. 1).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-48-2023]

On August 11, 2023, Vallourec Star, LP submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 164A, in Muskogee, Oklahoma.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 56589, August 18, 2023). On December 11, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: December 11, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-27481 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# C_2009282EN.01000702.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 4 de Bilbao — Spain) — Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira

(Case C-40/08) (1)

1

(Directive 93/13/EEC - Consumer contracts - Unfair arbitration clause - Measure void - Arbitration award which has become final - Enforcement - Whether the national court responsible for enforcement can consider of its own motion whether the unfair arbitration clause is null and void - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

2009/C 282/12

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 4 de Bilbao

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL

Applicant:

Defendant: Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 4 de Bilbao — Interpretation of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Adequate and effective means to prevent the continued use of unfair terms — Application for the enforcement of a final arbitration award made in default on the basis of an unfair arbitration clause

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a national court or tribunal hearing an action for enforcement of an arbitration award which has become final and was made in the absence of the consumer is required, where it has available to it the legal and factual elements necessary for that task, to assess of its own motion whether an arbitration clause in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer is unfair, in so far as, under national rules of procedure, it can carry out such an assessment in similar actions of a domestic nature. If that is the case, it is for that court or tribunal to establish all the consequences thereby arising under national law, in order to ensure that the consumer is not bound by that clause.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
BRS STAKEHOLDER MEETING

NOVEMBER 18, 2021, 1-3PM EST

AGENDA

Welcome Alan Pearson

BRS Assistant Deputy Administrator

BRS Quick Recap of FY 21 Focus for FY 22 Bernadette Juarez

BRS Deputy Administrator

Biotechnology Risk Assessment Program Update Subray Hegde

Director, Biotechnology Risk Assessment Programs

Compliance Update Doug Grant

Director, BRS Regulatory Operations Programs

APHIS eFile Update

Miranda Wanex

Management Analyst

Q&A Session

International Engagement Jessica Mahalingappa

BRS Associate Deputy Administrator

Overview of USDA Biotechnology Activities Anastasia Bodnar

USDA Biotechnology Coordinator

Q&A Session

Wrap-Up and Closing Alan Pearson

BRS Assistant Deputy Administrator

Break

eFile Breakout Session (optional) Miranda Wanex

Management Analyst
##### 



FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
 2005 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 
 RECITALS
     NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING RECITALS AND OF THE PROMISES AND CONDITIONS
HEREIN CONTAINED, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 1




---



##### 



Grant of Restricted Stock Units
 Restrictions
and Vesting Period
 Restrictions
 Vesting Period
 No Stockholder Rights
 Cessation of Employment
 Forfeiture
 2




---



##### 



Accelerated Vesting
 Certificates
 Taxes
 Restrictive Covenants
 Miscellaneous
 Incorporation of Plan
 3




---



##### 



Notices
 Successor
 Governing Law
 Amendment
  4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
INTERNATIONAL INC.BY: Signature of Grantee:Print name of GranteeAddressSocial Security Number
 5
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, §

No. 08-13-00187-CV

Appellant, §

Appeal from the

v. §

County Court at Law No. 3

HIGH RIDGE CONSTRUCTION, 

INC.,

Appellee.

§

§

§

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011DCV00361)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in part 

of the judgment as to Appellant’s unconstitutional takings claim, we therefore reverse the trial 

court’s order denying the plea to the jurisdiction and render judgment dismissing that claim. 

Further, as to Appellant’s breach of contract claim, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the 

plea to the jurisdiction and remand to the trial court to allow Appellant to amend their pleadings 

in accordance with this Court’s opinion. In all other respects, we affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

We further order that Appellant and Appellee each pay one-half (1/2) the costs of this 

appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Barajas, C.J., and Chew, C.J. (Senior Judges)

Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment (concurring opinion), joined by Barajas, C.J. 

(Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 88 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2015 

Mr. ROYCE (for himself and Mr. ENGEL) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Af4 fairs (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $15,223,986 for the One Hundred Four9 teenth Congress. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 88 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,611,993 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2015, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2016; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,611,993 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2016, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2017. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Lowell WALKER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard L. SANDWICK and Pete R. Falvo, dba Sandwick Motors, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 14266.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 20, 1976.

*1274Don Blackham, Blackham & Boley, Granger, for defendants and appellants.

Boyd M. Fullmer, Fullmer & Harding, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Lowell Walker, an independent insurance agent, sold to the defendants Richard L. Sandwick and Pete R. Falvo, dba Pete and Dick’s Auto Sales, a liability insurance policy issued by Yosemite Insurance Company, and sued for the premiums thereon. The defense asserted was that the plaintiff had not shown that'he had the right to receive the premium. Upon a trial the court found the issue in favor of the plaintiff.

The defendants’ argument is that to entitle the plaintiff to recover the premiums he must show either (1) an assignment of the insurance company’s rights to receive them, or (2) that he either paid or was charged, with the premiums and thus subro-gated to those rights. Plaintiff’s rejoinder to that contention is that both by statute 1 and more important, by his contract with the insurance company, which provides that he “ . . . assume full responsibility for payment of all premiums [for policies he causes to be issued by the company] . . . whether collected or not . . .” he is obligated to collect and remit the premiums to the insurance company. With this contention the trial court agreed in making findings and judgment for plaintiff. Inasmuch as there is a reasonable basis in the evidence to support them, they will not be disturbed on appeal.2

Plaintiff cross-appeals contending that the trial court should have awarded him an attorney’s fee. Attorney’s fees are awardable only if expressly contracted for, or provided for by statute;3 and if there is evidence as to the necessity and reasonableness of such fee.4 Such requirements were not met here, and the cross-appeal fails.

Affirmed. No costs awarded.

HENRIOD, C. J., and TUCKETT, EL-LETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.

1

. Section 31-17-22(2), U.O.A.1953, provides : “All funds representing premiums or returned premiums received by an agent, solicitor or broker, shall be held by him in his fiduciary capacity, and shall be promptly accounted for and paid to the insured, insurer, or agent as entitled thereto.”

2

. *American Aggregate v. Otto Buehner & Co., 528*P.2d 147 (Utah 1974).

3

. *B & R Supply Co. v. Bringhurst,*28 Utah 2d 442, 503 P.2d 1216 (1972) ; *Blake v. Blake,*17 Utah 2d 369, 412 P.2d 454 (1966) ; see also 22 Am.Jur.2d, Damages, Section 165.

4

. *Freed Finance Co. v. Stoker Motor Co.,*537 P.2d 1039 (Utah 1975) ; *F.M.A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.,*17 Utah 2d 80, 404 P.2d 670 (1965).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
       This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
       Statement of Financial Condition at October 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the
       Statement of Income for the three months ended October 31, 1997
       (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
       financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000880121
<NAME>                        MARKET AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         24,415,912
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,990,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,584,331
<PP&E>                                         1,173,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                 371,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,466,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,814,676
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       199
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,417,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,466,366
<SALES>                                        21,729,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,729,643
<CGS>                                          3,275,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,234,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,435,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,310,846
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,125,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .16
        



</TABLE>