alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 11193 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:16

- cr
- 00001

- DHB

- BKE

- 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DARRELL CORRELL HALL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

__ ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ (June 14, 2018)
Before JULIE CARNES , BRANCH and HULL , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Charles Butler, appointed counsel for Darrell Correll Hal l in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief

Case: 17-11193 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 1 of 22 prepared under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and

Hall ’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 17-11193 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 2 of 2
# C_2009153EN.01001301.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 May 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Den Haag (Netherlands)) — Siebrand BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-150/08) (1)

1

(Combined Nomenclature - Tariff headings 2206 and 2208 - Fermented beverage containing distilled alcohol - Beverage produced from fruit or from a natural product - Addition of substances - Effects - Loss of the taste, smell and appearance of the original beverage)

2009/C 153/24

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Siebrand BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Den Haag –Interpretation of tariff headings 2206 and 2208 of the Combined Nomenclature — Fermented beverage containing distilled alcohol — Addition of water and ingredients resulting in a loss of the taste, smell and/or appearance of a beverage produced from fruit or from a natural product

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Fermented alcohol-based beverages corresponding originally to heading 2206 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2587/91 of 26 July 1991, to which a certain proportion of distilled alcohol, water, sugar syrup, aromas, colourings and, in some cases, a cream base have been added, resulting in the loss of the taste, smell and/or appearance of a beverage produced from a particular fruit or natural product, do not come under heading 2206 of the Combined Nomenclature but rather under heading 2208 thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 5.7.2008.

1

---
$

*Animals must be at least

 18 months of age.

How to Help?

Contact

Why Scrapie?

1. Set up a sampling agreement 

2. Save heads of adult* sheep and goats 

3. Store heads and ALL identification

 (such as ear tags) in refrigeration 

Scrapie kills sheep and goats while

limiting exports. The industry needs

your help in finding the last case of

scrapie in the U.S. and to show 

when the U.S. is free of scrapie.

Slaughter facilities that save adult sheep 

and goat heads can get paid.

Finish the Fight Against Scrapie!

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Issued May 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This article  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the year
ended March 30, 2000 Form 10-K Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0000856135
<NAME>                    American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                            US Dollars

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1.00
<CASH>                                                        874
<SECURITIES>                                                2,453
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  17
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            3,343
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       7,580
<BONDS>                                                     2,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                5,145
<SALES>                                                     7,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              247
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            2,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (2,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (2,036)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0



</TABLE>
# C_2019065EN.01004701.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/47

---

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Darmanin v EASO

(Case T-116/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/61)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
# C_2020313EN.01002001.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/20

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2020 — Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-202/19 P) (1)

(2020/C 313/26)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
AAM-12-016-E 

October 17, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10373 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1100 

Mr. David Alan Fernald 

President 

New England Air Transport, Inc. 

604 Violette Settlement Road 

Fort Kent, ME 04743 

Dear Mr. Fernald: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 5, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of New England Air Transport, Inc. (New England Air Transport), for an exemption 

from part 120 to allow New England Air Transport, which is operating under separate parts of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to cover its safety-sensitive employees under 

one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to New England Air Transport. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant New England Air Transport, Inc., an exemption from part 

120 to the extent necessary to allow New England Air Transport, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of New England Air Transport are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the New England Air Transport part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: December 14, 2007 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE      
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         | Todd E. Wille          
|                         | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements for the twelve month period ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298
<INVENTORY>                                        560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,582
<PP&E>                                          47,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (41)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
        

</TABLE>
OUR BIZ

BATTLES 

THE BUG

aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slfbiz 
aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slfbiz

WE’VE JOINED 

THE BATTLE TO 

BEAT THE BUG
Cite as 2015 Ark. 127

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-14-1098

DEMETRIUS CURTIS

APPELLANT

V.

RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered March 19, 2015

PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF

CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO FILE

A BELATED BRIEF 

[CHICOT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

NO. 09CV-14-72]

HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM

GIBSON, JUDGE

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION AND

PETITION MOOT.

PER CURIAM

On October 15, 2014, appellant Demetrius Curtis filed a pro se petition for writ of

habeas corpus in the Chicot County Circuit Court where he was incarcerated. The circuit court

denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Now before

us are appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari and motion to file a belated brief.

Because the public records of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) reflect that

appellant is no longer incarcerated, it is clear that he could not prevail on appeal were we to

permit the appeal to proceed. A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of

habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody. Branning v. Harmon, 2009 Ark. 533 (per curiam). 

Accordingly, we find that the motion and petition are moot. Thus, we do not reach the merits

of the motion and petition and dismiss the appeal. 

Appeal dismissed; motion and petition moot.
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

  

December 15, 2016

 

Mercantile Bank Corporation

Mercantile Bank of Michigan

310 Leonard St. NW

Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504

 

Re: Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated November 13, 2014

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

This letter confirms our agreement reached today regarding the Employment Agreement dated as of November 13, 2014, as amended by a First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated May 28, 2015, by and among you and me (the "Employment Agreement"). We have agreed that, effective January 1, 2017, all references in the Employment Agreement to my title as President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of Mercantile Bank of Michigan (the "Bank"), are amended to refer to Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, and all references in the Employment Agreement to my title as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of Mercantile Bank Corporation (the "Company") are amended to refer to President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 

 

We have further agreed that, effective as of January 1, 2017, my annual salary will be $435,000 for calendar year 2017. 

 

Except as specifically amended by this letter, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. This letter may be executed in counterparts, and is governed by Michigan law.

 

 

	
 
	 	
/s/ Robert B. Kaminski, Jr.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Robert B. Kaminski, Jr.
	
 



  

MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION

 

 

By: /s/ Michael H. Price          

 

     Its: Chairman                       

 

 

MERCANTILE BANK OF MICHIGAN

 

By: /s/ Michael H. Price          

 

     Its: Chairman
# C_2021182EN.01002202.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/22

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — T.H.C. v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

(Case C-755/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Asylum policy - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 46 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy - Action brought against the rejection of a subsequent application for international protection as inadmissible - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Detention)

(2021/C 182/31)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: T.H.C.

Defendant: Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

Operative part of the order

Article 46 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which subjects an appeal against a decision to reject a subsequent application for international protection to a time limit of five days, including public holidays, where the applicant concerned is held in detention, provided, first, that the principle of equivalence is observed and, second, that genuine access for the applicants held in detention to the procedural safeguards granted by EU law to applicants for international protection is ensured within that period.

It is for the national court to ascertain whether the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings meets those requirements.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5525]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. AMODEI:
       H.R. 6236.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The constitutional authority on which this bill rests is 
     the power of Congress to make rules for the government and 
     regulation of the land and naval forces, as enumerated in 
     Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 of the United States 
     Constitution.
```
Exhibit 11  Computation of Earnings Per Share
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 11
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share



                                                  For the Year Ended
                                                     September 30,
                                           ---------------------------------
                                                1996               1995
                                           --------------     --------------
                                                (Dollars in thousands,
                                               except per share amounts)

Net Income                                     $1,153             $1,206
                                               ======             ======

Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                      1750              1,975

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
effect of stock options                            41                 65
                                               ------             ------

Total weighted average common shares and
 common share equivalents outstanding           1,790              2,040
                                               ======             ======

Earnings per common share and common
share equivalents                              $ 0.64             $ 0.59
                                               ======             ======