alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin T. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/    KEVIN T. THOMPSON                            
|                                                    
|Kevin T. Thompson                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





February 23, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarterly period ending September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                       371
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,071
<PP&E>                                           2,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,285
<SALES>                                         31,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,855
<CGS>                                           11,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,720
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018161EN.01005702.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/57

---

Action brought on 1 March 2018 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECB

(Case T-145/18)

(2018/C 161/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France) and 37 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and P. Kupka, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Article 8 of ECB Decision No ECB/SSM/2017 — 9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of 19 December 2017, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken regarding irrevocable payment commitments in respect of the deposit guarantee schemes or the resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 8 of ECB Decision No ECB/SSM/2017 — 9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of 19 December 2017, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken regarding irrevocable payment commitments in respect of the deposit guarantee schemes or the resolution funds;

| — | order the ECB to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-143/18, Societe Generale v ECB.

Societe Generale

ECB

---
# C_2009205EN.01000702.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 July 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Alicante y no 1 de Marca Comunitaria — Spain) — Fundación Española para la Innovación de la Artesanía (FEIA) v Cul de Sac Espacio Creativo SL, Acierta Product Position SA

o

o

(Case C-32/08) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Community designs - Articles 14 and 88 - Proprietor of the right to the Community design - Unregistered design - Commissioned design)

2009/C 205/11

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Alicante y no 1 de Marca Comunitaria

o

o

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fundación Española para la Innovación de la Artesanía (FEIA)

Applicant:

Defendants: Cul de Sac Espacio Creativo SL, Acierta Product Position SA

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Alicante y no 1 de Marca Comunitaria — Interpretation of Articles 14(1) and (3) and 88(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ 2002 L 3, p. 1) — Proprietor of the rights — Right vesting in the employer or in the employed designer — Definitions

o

o

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs does not apply to Community designs that have been produced as a result of a commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs does not apply to Community designs that have been produced as a result of a commission.

| 2. | In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, Article 14(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 must be interpreted as meaning that the right to the Community design vests in the designer, unless it has been assigned by way of contract to his successor in title. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, Article 14(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 must be interpreted as meaning that the right to the Community design vests in the designer, unless it has been assigned by way of contract to his successor in title.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
#### State v. Roberts

22967

02/09/2001

Affirmed
March 2020

There were 10 surveillance inspections conducted at 8 different sites for a total of 55

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures remained low in response to cold air 

temperatures. Seven of the 8 sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and 

were scheduled for monthly sampling. One Category 2 (suspect) site was scheduled 

for biweekly sampling. No cages were confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

April 2019 108 0 21077

May 2019 92 0 21169

June 2019 123 0 21292

July 2019 123 0 21415

August 2019 96 0 21511

September 2019 101 0 21612

October 2019 90 0 21702

November 2019 93 0 21795

December 2019 91 0 21886

January 2020 81 0 21967

February 2020 78 0 22045

March 2020 55 0 23000
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 8,
2002 into this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001 and into the following Registration
Statements:



| |  |   Registration Statement No. 33-37855 on Form S-8
  Registration Statement No. 333-19215 on Form S-8
  Registration Statement No. 333-93773 on Form S-8
  Registration Statement No. 333-53531 on Form S-8
  Registration Statement No. 333-75742 on Form S-8
  Registration Statement No. 333-75744 on Form S-8
  Registration Statement No. 333-27685 on Form S-3
  Registration Statement No. 33-57920 on Form S-3DPOS
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chartered Accountants

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

March 27, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1051 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1051

 To include county and municipal correctional facilities among medical 
facilities that qualify for designation as health professional shortage 
        areas for purposes of the National Health Service Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2015

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include county and municipal correctional facilities among medical 
facilities that qualify for designation as health professional shortage 
        areas for purposes of the National Health Service Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Health Service Corps 
Expansion Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAL FACILITIES.

    Section 332(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254e(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``(including care 
        provided by a city or county health department to inmates of a 
        county or municipal jail)'' after ``county health department''; 
        and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``State correctional 
        institution'' and inserting ``State, county, or municipal 
        correctional institution''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Asao v. Namuo

17176

11/18/94

Reversed
# C_2008022EN.01004901.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/49

---

Action brought on 29 November 2007 — France v Commission

(Case T-432/07)

(2008/C 22/92)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and A.-L. During, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Commission Decision 2007/647/EC of 3 October 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (1), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the applicant for producers' organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector in respect of the financial years 2003 and 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision 2007/647/EC of 3 October 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (1), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the applicant for producers' organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector in respect of the financial years 2003 and 2004;

1

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of the contested decision on the ground that the Commission wrongly interpreted and applied Article 11 of Council Regulation No 2200/96 (2) in finding that the French Government had failed to observe the conditions laid down in that provision for the recognition of producers' organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector.

2

---

(1)  Notified under document number C(2007) 4477, OJ 2007 L 261, p. 28.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (OJ 1996 L 297, p. 1)

2

---
#### Gherezgiher Tecle EMBEYE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-60287

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 3, 2005.

James R. Patterson, Law Offices of Lilia S. Velasquez, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Linda Susan Wendtland, Margaret Morgan New-ell, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Anne M. Estrada, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Dallas, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration & Natu*491ralization Service District Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gherezgiher Tecle Embeye, a native of Ethiopia and citizen of Eritria, petitions for review of an order issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) decision to deny his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Embeye challenges the finding of both the IJ and BIA that he lacked credibility. Embeye also argues that he has established his eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. Embeye has abandoned any argument he might have raised regarding the denial of his motion for protection under the CAT by failing to challenge the decision in his petition for review. *See Witter v. INS,*113 F.3d 549, 554 (5th Cir.1997).

Both issues raised by Embeye would require this court to review and overturn a determination by the IJ and BIA as to his credibility as a witness. We may not “substitute our judgment for that of the BIA or IJ with respect to the credibility of the witnesses or ultimate factual findings based on credibility determinations.” *See Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994).

Accordingly, Embeye’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Last updated on Friday, July 11, 2014

http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/index.cfm

Water: State, Tribal & Territorial Standards 

Quick Links

• Tribes

• Territories

• Regional Coordinators

You are here: Water Science & Technology Surface Water Standards & Guidance Water Quality Standards State, Tribal & Territorial Standards

State, Tribal & Territorial Standards

Water Quality Standards Repository (WQS Repository)

In this repository, EPA has compiled unofficial copies of state, territorial, and authorized tribal water quality standards that EPA has 

approved or are otherwise in effect for Clean Water Act purposes.

Please note the water quality standards may contain additional provisions outside the scope of the Clean Water Act, its 

implementing federal regulations, or EPA's authority. In some cases, these additional provisions have been included within this

repository as supplementary information or for context.

EPA is posting the water quality standards in this repository as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made 

a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. 

Please contact the appropriate Regional EPA Water Quality Standards coordinator for questions about water quality standards for a particular state, tribe, or territory.

Searching Water Quality Standards

Search water quality standards by keywords using the search box below. To view a particular state's standards, click on the map or use the drop down menu below.

Keyword Search

Search

Browse Water Quality Standards

Choose a state from the map or list below. 

Alabama  GO

Tribes | Territories

Water Quality Standards Database 

While updates to the Water Quality Standards Database ceased in 2007, you can still view water quality standard examples from it (in table or map form) along with designated 

uses for some state's waters . See EPA's Water Quality Standards Database. 

Federally Promulgated Standards

In some states, EPA has promulgated replacement standards for some waters. See Water Quality Standards Regulations for a list of promulgation actions. 

State, Tribal & Territorial Standards | State, Tribal & Territorial Standards | US EPA Page 1 of 2

http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/index.cfm 2/2/2015
State, Tribal & Territorial Standards | State, Tribal & Territorial Standards | US EPA Page 2 of 2

http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/wqslibrary/index.cfm 2/2/2015
# C_2020399EN.01001601.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union

(Case C-348/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic - Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the appellant’s name - Action for annulment)

(2020/C 399/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Drex Technologies SA (represented by: E. Ruchat, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Drex Technologies SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Drex Technologies SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Dear L.Iri

Van Zsndt: Qplalon No. 0146

ation made bye Regular %errlon? th Leglalatusc,

**0r** Xducatloa or a ut3 u3 sl!& e

t he lxio n, ror t he ir

: r 6- **~Jaln ’** **tlg** 

### authorite

### it 18 our opinion the&the Colmlttee BoardmEy ~olnlay

authori thl +pen$lturo 0s and the aonles for the upenseb inOWed iJl a18OhWalU3 thdlf Z88p8OtIv8 duties. sor lnatanae, if an aaltos should beuserpl and necessary to th8 **disOharg8** 0r both th8 duty of 

### the Comltt88 and the dutiss or the Bomd, the Board and the Conslittee

may jointly hire such 

### auditor fix his nqlary (within

the Unit imposed

by the Aat! and preset/be t&e duties. nhlah he ohall perfow for eaph. In suah 0~80 

### the payroll or vouohershouldbe aieped by the kw~nl and 

### the Committee.

Y& attention

113 dire&&d to the faot that,
or 

### QOUEW, a pap011 for expen~ea 

### validlylnaurrea by the Conmfttse,

authorPmd and.aQaqI by the kmIttee, will not **be any**  

### the lessvalid beoauae'~maoh expenses tier8 also authorizedand the payroll Si&Wd by 

### the Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      16,761,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              232,728,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 9,450,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           276,874,000
<PP&E>                                      48,410,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,208,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             365,973,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      162,976,000
<BONDS>                                    156,519,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       223,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,669,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               365,973,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,248,443,000<F2>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              437,635,000<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,881,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,334,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,484,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,607,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,834,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,834,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<FN>
<F1>Excludes current portion of bonds, mortgages, and similar debt.
<F2>Represents gross revenue which includes costs of certain services subcontracted
to third parties and other reimbursable direct project costs, such as materials
procured by the Company on behalf of its customers.
<F3>Excludes subcontract and direct material costs of $720,342,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Hamamoto Corp. v. International Sav. and Loan Ass’n.

23295

06/28/2002

Denied

98 Hawai'i 512, 51 P.3d 379