alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                    BIOTRANSPLANT INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
                          (A Development Stage Company)

<TABLE>
                             COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE (1)
<CAPTION>

                                                         Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                                            September 30,                   September 30,
                                                        1995            1996            1995           1996
                                                     ----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Net Loss:                                            $ (191,377)    $(2,323,714)    $(3,314,499)    $(3,470,099)
                                                     ==========     ===========     ===========     ===========

Shares Used in Computing Pro Forma Net Loss Per
     Common Share: Weighted Average Common Stock
     Outstanding During the Period                      126,310       8,548,756         123,623       6,683,869
     Conversion of Redeemable Convertible
        Preferred Stock (1)                           3,212,896              --       3,212,896              --
     Dilutive Effect of Common Equivalent Shares
        Issued Subsequent to March 1, 1995 (2)          676,048              --         676,048         315,818
                                                     ----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
                                                      4,015,254       8,548,756       4,012,567       6,999,687
                                                     ----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share                  $    (0.05)    $     (0.27)    $     (0.83)    $     (0.50)
                                                     ==========     ===========     ===========     ===========

<FN>

------------------------

(1) Effective with the closing of the Company's initial public offering of common stock, all shares of
    redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically converted into shares of common stock. Accordingly the
    equivalent number of weighted average common shares that would have been outstanding during each period
    presented have been included as outstanding.

(2) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83, common stock, preferred
    stock, stock options and warrants issued at prices below the initial public offering price per share ("cheap
    stock") during the twelve month period immediately preceding the filing date of the Company's Registration
    Statement for its initial public offering have been included as outstanding for all periods presented until
    the effective date of the Company's initial public offering. The dilutive effect of the common and common
    stock equivalents was computed in accordance with the treasury stock method.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(a)
 CERTIFICATION
     Exchange Act Exchange Act
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ WILLIAM J. DOYLEWilliam J. DoylePresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1998
<CASH>                                           7,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                       269
<INVENTORY>                                     11,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,942
<PP&E>                                          49,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 632,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,516
<BONDS>                                        492,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           428
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   632,719
<SALES>                                        222,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,183
<CGS>                                          178,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3,387)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,161
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       569
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Sep-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         Oct-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<CASH>                                                   $3,136
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            25,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                              22,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         58,095
<PP&E>                                                   20,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           78,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    78,281
<BONDS>                                                  11,384
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     42
<OTHER-SE>                                              (10,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             78,709
<SALES>                                                  65,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         65,097
<CGS>                                                    67,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            67,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         35,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       (2,538)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (40,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (40,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (40,533)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            ($2.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            ($2.30)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 5, 2009 

s0602 

Order 

 

June 5, 2009 

138923 

_________________________________________ 

In re BLAKE SAMUEL COLLINS, Minor. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 138923 

 COA: 288253 

Wayne CC Family Division: 

08-479017-NA 

MICHAEL FORREST FLETCHER, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

CRYSTAL JEWELL COLLINS and DEPLURI 

HARRIS, 

Respondents. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
 

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(P)2

                  MODIFICATIONS TO CONTRACT DE-AC34-95RF00825

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

  DATE        MOD             CHANGES
  ----        ---             -------
<S>         <C>       <C>                                                 <C> 
             MOD 41   HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED

11/25/96     AO42     1. Article B.3, Obligation of Funds as Follows:

                         Funds Obligated to date                           $  872,986,557.80
                         Funds Obligated by Mod AO42                       $  144,251,561.12
                         Funds Obligated since inception of contract       $1,017,238,118.12

12/23/96     AO43     1. Article B.3, Obligation of Funds as Follows:

                         Funds Obligated to date                           $1,017,238,118.12
                         Funds Obligated by Mod AO43                       $     -133,878.21
                         Funds Obligated since inception of contract       $1,017,104,240.71

01/27/97     AO44     1. Article B.3, Obligation of Funds as Follows:

                         Funds Obligated to date                           $1,017,104,240.71
                         Funds Obligated by Mod AO44                       $   30,784,500.00
                         Funds Obligated since inception of contract       $1,047,888,740.71

02/11/97     AO45     1. Article B.3, Obligation of Funds as Follows:

                         Funds Obligated to date                           $1,047,888,740.71
                         Funds Obligated by Mod AO45                       $      (47,000.00)
                         Funds Obligated since inception of contract       $1,047,841,740.71

02/28/97     AO46     1. Article B.3, Obligation of Funds as Follows:

                         Funds Obligated to date                           $1,047,841,740.71
                         Funds Obligated by Mod AO46                       $  170,829,500.38
                         Funds Obligated since inception of contract       $1,218,671,241.09

</TABLE> 

END OF MODS RECEIVED TO DATE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STUART MAYNARD CLARK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1783

[December 7, 2023]

Appeal of order denying petition for writ of habeas corpus to the Circuit 

Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael C. 

Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562015CF003233A. 

Stuart Maynard Clark, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FOR OFFICIAL USE

PERMIT#:_________________________

HORSE IDENTIFICATION: _____________________________

CERTIFICATION; TRANSIT STOPS VIA AIR 

This is to certify that that the horse(s) listed on this permit transited through _______________ 

(country) and either remained on the plane during transit or were held separate from other horses of 

unlike status in a qualified holding facility not used for any equine breeding purpose while awaiting

departure from ______________ (Port of embarkation). Permit is invalid unless the enclosed statement

is endorsed by an Authorized Representative.

_______________________________________ ______________

Name and Official Title of Authorized Representative* Date

*Authorized Representatives include a Salaried Veterinary Officer of the National Government or a

Customs Official. If horses remained on the plane during transit and a Veterinary Officer of the National

Government or Customs Official are unavailable, then endorsement by an airline pilot may be accepted

with prior approval by APHIS.
Chapter 2.4.4. – Infection with Marteilia refringens

Annex 18. Item 6.5.3. – Article 10.2.3. of Chapter 10.2. ‘Infection with *Aphanomyces invadans*’

CHAPTER 10.2.

INFECTION WITH *APHANOMYCES INVADANS*(EPIZOOTIC ULCERATIVE SYNDROME)

[...]

Article 10.2.3.

Measures for the importation or transit of aquatic animal products for any purpose regardless of the infection with *A. invadans* status of the exporting country, zone or compartment

The *aquatic animal products* listed below have been assessed as meeting the criteria for safety of *aquatic animal products* in accordance with Article 5.4.1. When authorising the importation or transit of these *aquatic animal products*, *Competent Authorities*should not require any *sanitary measures* related to *A. invadans*, regardless of the infection with *A. invadans* status of the *exporting country*, *zone* or *compartment*:

1)	*aquatic animal products* that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least ~~60~~100°C for at least ~~five~~one minute~~s~~, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates *A. invadans*;

~~2)~~~~mechanically dried eviscerated fish that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 60°C for at least five minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates *A. invadans*;~~

~~3~~2)	fish *meal* that has been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least ~~60~~100°C for at least ~~five~~one minute~~s~~, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates *A. invadans*;

~~4~~3)	fish oil;

~~5~~4)	frozen eviscerated fish;

~~6~~5)	frozen fish fillets or steaks.

[...]

____________

WOAH *Aquatic Manual* 2025	8
H. Res. 620 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 23, 2016. 

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Antonin Scalia, Associate 

Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. 

Resolved, That the House tenders its deep sympathy to 

the members of the family of the late Associate Justice in 

their bereavement. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and to the Supreme Court and transmit a copy 

of the same to the family of the late Associate Justice. 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the late 

Associate Justice. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 21-0178

Filed January 12, 2022

BRANDON VANBUSKIRK,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ELSIE SEIFERT,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cass County, Amy Zacharias, Judge.

Elsie Seifert appeals provisions of a paternity decree. AFFIRMED.

Theodore R. Wonio of Rasmussen, Nelson & Wonio, P.L.C., Atlantic, for 

appellant.

Robert J. Engler of Cambridge Law Firm, P.L.C., Atlantic, for appellee.

Considered by Bower, C.J., and Greer and Badding, JJ.
2

BOWER, Chief Judge.

Elsie Seifert and Brandon VanBuskirk are the parents of a child born in 

August 2018. VanBuskirk was seventeen years old and still in high school when 

the child was born. Seifert was twenty. VanBuskirk filed a petition to establish 

paternity, custody, and related matters. Both parents sought physical care of the 

child. After a trial, the court observed, “To say that both parents have struggled 

with immaturity is an understatement.” Seifert appeals the decree placing the child 

in VanBuskirk’s physical care. 

This case was tried in equity, and therefore, our review is de novo. Iowa R. 

App. R. 6.907. Because the district court observes the parties and witnesses, we 

give weight to its fact and credibility findings, but we are not bound by them. Iowa 

R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g); see In re Marriage of Larsen, 912 N.W.2d 444, 448 (Iowa 

2018). Our first and governing consideration is the best interests of the child. Iowa 

R. App. P. 6.904(3)(o).

The trial court accurately described each parent’s shortcomings and 

immaturity, assessed the credibility of witnesses, and found it notable that a 

witness who was once in favor of the child being placed in Seifert’s physical care 

testified the child was better cared for in VanBuskirk’s home. The court awarded 

joint legal custody, placed the child in VanBuskirk’s physical care, and ordered 

liberal visitation. On our de novo review, we agree with the trial court’s findings, 

and we therefore affirm. 

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020390EN.01000801.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, French Republic, European Commission

(Case C-122/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Fight against terrorism - Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities - Freezing of funds - Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Article 1(4) and (6) - Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Article 2(3) - Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts - Conditions - Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority - Sentencing decision - Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Obligation to state reasons - Right to effective judicial protection)

(2020/C 390/10)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Hamas (represented by: L. Glock, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and K. Pavlaki, acting as Agents), French Republic, European Commission (represented initially by F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Bouquet, J. Roberti di Sarsina, C. Zadra and A. Tizzano, subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Bouquet and J. Roberti di Sarsina, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Hamas shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Hamas shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.

---
#### State v. Caspino

15294

1/30/92

Denied
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the
annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 Date: December 28, 2005/s/ Jay N. TorokJay N. TorokChairman of the Board andPrincipal Executive OfficerGreat Western Land and Recreation, Inc.