alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6933

SWINDELL BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; CHARLES M.

CREECY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-96-933-1)

Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Swindell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a

magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The

only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court

extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The magistrate judge entered his order on April 1, 1997;*

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on June 27, 1997. Appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal leaves this court

without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal.

We therefore deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
3
19363, 19364, 19365

#### Y.Y. Valley Corp. v. Kamai; Y.Y. Valley Corp. v. Lum; Y.Y. Valley Corp. v. Aurio

Affirmed
NUMBER 13-17-00499-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOHN EDWARD HAGENSICK, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On appeal from the 36th District Court 

of Aransas County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Rodriguez, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Chris Iles, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw 

as counsel. According to his motion to withdraw, counsel has recently discovered a 

conflict of interest and requests new appellate counsel be appointed.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel 

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 
2

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the 

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with 

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of 

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed 

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to 

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge 

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall 

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be 

appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number 

of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial 

court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be 

filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of 

this order. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of January, 2018.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04-16-00406-CR

Carl Wade BAILES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0076

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing is 

hereby GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office

(512) 854 - 9457 (512) 854 - 9457 (512) 854 - 9420 (512) 854 - 9669 fax: 854 - 4744 fax: 854 - 9549 fax: 854 - 4566 fax: 854 - 4457 

## Velva L. Price Travis County District Clerk Travis County Courthouse Complex P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767 - 9003

December 10 , 201 5

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court of Appeals P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711

- 2547 RE: 03 - 15 - 00742 - CV; D - 1 - GN - 14 - 00 2410 Dear Mr. Kyle , A clerk’s record in cause number, D

- 1

- GN

- 14

- 0024 10 and Court of Appeals number 03

- 15

- 00 742

- CV , styled, DARLENE MORIARITY V TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING , is due in your office December 10 , 2015

. This office has not received paymen t of clerk’s record as of today, December 10 , 2015. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions , please contact me at (512) 854

- 5835

. Sincerely, Trish Winkler Appeals Clerk I I Travis County District Clerk’s Office Civil Division (512 ) 854

- 4309
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), I, James E. Dixon, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ James E. Dixon, Jr.

James E. Dixon, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Jack K. Lai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
5. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
6. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
7. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
8. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
9. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
10. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2004



|/s/ Jack K. Lai                                                                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jack K. Lai
Vice President Finance & Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary



---
# C_2020399EN.01002101.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — CC v European Parliament

(Case C-612/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Judgment of the General Court ruling on remittal from the General Court after the partial annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, CC v Parliament (F-9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) - Recruitment - Open competition EUR/A/151/98 - Errors made by the European Parliament in the management of the list of approved candidates - Material damage - Action to establish non-contractual liability)

(2020/C 399/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: CC (represented by: G. Maximini, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: T. Lazian, M. Ecker and E. Despotopoulou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders CC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5413]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, today the majority leader filed 
cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 3414, the Cybersecurity Act of 
2012. If no agreement otherwise is reached, that vote would be on 
Friday. However, we hope to reach an agreement to hold that vote 
tomorrow.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 8 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 8

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2015.
    Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act of 1929, as amended, the 
six minority employees authorized therein shall be the following named persons, 
effective January 6, 2015, until otherwise ordered by the House, to-wit: Nadeam 
Elshami, George Kundanis, Diane Dewhirst, Richard Meltzer, Wyndee Parker, and 
Drew Hammill, each to receive gross compensation pursuant to the provisions of 
House Resolution 119, Ninety-fifth Congress, as enacted into permanent law by 
section 115 of Public Law 95-94. In addition, the Minority Leader may appoint 
and set the annual rate of pay for up to 3 further minority employees.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL M BLUESTEIN, Appellant, vs. ELLEN G. BLUESTEIN, N/K/A ELLEN GREEN-MILLER, No. 70158 

# FILED JUN 0 3 2016 Respondent. 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant 

### to the settlement conference, the stipulation for voluntary dismissal, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: aNact



### cc: Hon. Cheryl B. Moss, District Judge, Family Court Division Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Urban Law Firm Wright Law Offices Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER (01-1947
# C_2021062EN.01000502.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Husqvarna AB v Lidl Digital International GmbH & Co. KG, formerly Lidl E-Commerce International GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-607/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EU trade marks - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 51(1)(a) - Article 55(1) - Revocation of rights in an EU mark - EU mark which has not been put to genuine use within a continuous period of five years - Expiry of the period of five years - Date of assessment)

(2021/C 62/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant on a point of law: Husqvarna AB

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Lidl Digital International GmbH & Co. KG, formerly Lidl E-Commerce International GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 51(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the [European Union] trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of a counterclaim for the revocation of rights in an EU mark, the relevant date for the purposes of determining whether the continuous five-year period referred to in that provision has ended is the date on which that counterclaim was filed.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
<PAGE>
 
                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-45547, 333-01951, 033-60051, 033-58329 and 033-58321 on Form S-8 and No. 
333-67985 on Form S-3 of AmeriSource Health Corporation, of our report dated
November 3, 1998, except for Note 13, as to which the date is December 8, 1998,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
AmeriSource Health Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998.




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 18, 1998
H. Res. 932 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 6, 2016. 

Whereas telephone companies are required to permit third 

parties to bill for services on a consumer’s monthly telephone bill in certain circumstances; 

Whereas ‘‘cramming’’ is the act of placing unauthorized 

charges on a wireline, wireless, or bundled services telephone bill of a consumer; 

Whereas the Federal Communications Commission estimates 

that cramming has harmed tens of millions of people in 

the United States; and 

Whereas existing protections against cramming have not prevented harm to consumers: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that protections against cramming should be improved 

and consumers should be empowered to stop unwanted thirdparty charges on their telephone bills. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1 (b)
CERTIFICATIONS

I, L. Wade Helms, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc.:

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting; and


Date:    February 2, 2006


/s/ L. Wade Helms
------------------------
By:   L. Wade Helms
Executive Vice President
# C_2021263EN.01003702.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/37

---

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — SCF Terminal (Cyprus) and SHB v Council and Others

(Case T-199/18) (1)

(2021/C 263/48)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

30, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: April 16, 2015 , Speech during Environmental Business Council Earth Day Even including Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** On April 16, 2015, Regional Administrator Curt Spalding spoke at the Environmental Business Council’s Earth Day Event. The speech included the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Pla nts
. **ATTENDEES** Curt Spalding, EPA Approximately

40 people attended this conference. Attendance was not taken by EPA
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5212]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         CANCER FREE LABEL ACT

  (Mr. DEUTCH asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Mr. DEUTCH. Madam Speaker, we all know that wearing sunscreen, 
quitting smoking, or steering clear of asbestos can reduce our cancer 
risk. Yet, carcinogens are all around us, and exposure to these cancer-
causing agents can be found in everyday products and in the food we 
eat.
  For the most part, consumers are kept in the dark with no way to know 
for sure whether the makeup they use or the food they eat contains 
known carcinogens. It's time to help consumers choose safer products 
for themselves and for their loved ones. That's why today I'm 
introducing the Cancer Free Label Act. My bill will give companies the 
chance to market to consumers the fact that the products that they make 
are free of carcinogens.
  Just as consumers refused to buy baby products laden with BPA and 
nearly wiped this chemical from the shelves, the Cancer Free Label Act 
will use market-driven forces to drive change. By passing the Cancer 
Free Label Act, we can give families across America the opportunity to 
avoid cancer-causing agents. And by promoting healthier choices, we 
will even be able to save lives.

                          ____________________
```