alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Armstrong,
Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.           
|John L. Armstrong, Jr.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 9, 2008
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders 

SkyFinancial Group, Inc. 

Bowling Green, Ohio 

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows of Sky Financial Group, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of Sky Financial Group, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. 

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statementpresentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of Sky Financial Group, Inc.’s operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31,2002, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

 

Asdisclosed in Note 1, Sky Financial Group, Inc. adopted new accounting guidance for goodwill and intangible assets in 2002. 

 

We have also audited the adjustments described in Note 26 that were applied to reclassify the 2002 financial statements to give retroactive effect to Sky Financial Group,Inc.’s discontinued operations. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. 

 

Crowe Chizek and Company LLC 

 

Columbus, Ohio 

January 21, 2003, except for Note 26, 

as to which the date is July 2, 2004
EXHIBIT 32


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GUNDAKER/JORDAN AMERICAN HOLDINGS,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004,
(the "Report"), I, W. Neal Jordan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


June 24, 2005



/s/ W. Neal Jordan
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                      Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (the Company) on Forms S-8 [Registration Nos. 33-
42677 (Non-employee Directors Stock Option Plan), 33-42678 (Stock Incentive
Plan), 33-51460 (Section 401(k) Plan), 33-60663 (Retirement Plan), 33-60661 and
33-65351 (Employee Stock Ownership Plan), 33-60665 (Consultants, Agents and Part
Time Employees Stock Plan) and 33-51812 (Employee Stock Purchase Plan)] and on
Form S-3 [Registration No. 33-51677 (600,000 Warrants)], and [Registration No.
333-16937 (1,135,795 shares)] of our report dated March 26, 1998, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of ICF
Kaiser International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the ten months ended
December 31, 1995, which report is included in the Company's Report on Form 10-
K.



McLean, Virginia
March 30, 1998
#### Udell Estate, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Standard Handkerchief Co., Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 21, 1959.

*Mortimer Braveman*for appellant.

*Joseph Lewis Simon*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

At the time of the verification of the petition and the issuance of the precept the tenant was not in default. Since the rent was due on January 1, 1959, a legal holiday, the tenant, pursuant to section 25 of the General Construction Law, *880Was entitled to make payment on the next business day. Accordingly, the final order in favor of the landlord was improperly made despite the fact that the rent was due at the time of the trial of the proceeding.

The final order and judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant dismissing the petition, with costs.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1070 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1070

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification 
 regarding the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance 
  may be transferred under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2015

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification 
 regarding the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance 
  may be transferred under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GI Education Benefit Fairness Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER POST-9/11 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 3319 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Eligible Dependents.--
            ``(1) Transfer.--An individual approved to transfer an 
        entitlement to educational assistance under this section may 
        transfer the individual's entitlement as follows:
                    ``(A) To the individual's spouse.
                    ``(B) To one or more of the individual's children.
                    ``(C) To a combination of the individuals referred 
                to in subparagraphs (A) and (B).
            ``(2) Definition of children.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `children' includes dependents described 
        in section 1072(2)(I) of title 10.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to educational assistance payable under chapter 33 
of title 38, United States Code, before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020175EN.01001301.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2020 –Barata v Parliament

(Case T-81/18) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Certification procedure - 2016 promotion exercise - Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme - Article 45a of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Equal treatment - Rights of the defence)

(2020/C 175/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: João Miguel Barata (Evere, Belgium) (represented by: G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of 30 October 2017 by which the Parliament rejected the applicant’s complaint, secondly, the letter of 20 March 2017 containing the opinion of the Joint Certification Procedure Committee recommending that the appointing authority reject the applicant’s appeal, thirdly, the letter of 14 February 2017 notifying him of his results and informing him that a draft list of seven officials selected to take part in the training programme had been drawn up, fourthly, the letter of 8 December 2016 informing the applicant of his results following the first stage of the 2016 certification procedure, fifthly, the letter of 21 December 2016 informing the applicant of the action taken following his request for review and, sixthly, the notice of internal competition 2016/014 of 7 October 2016 communicated to staff on 20 October 2016 and the full draft list of officials admitted for participation in the resulting training programme.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr João Miguel Barata to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr João Miguel Barata to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
# C_2019093EN.01006201.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/62

---

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2019 — Szécsi and Somossy v Commission

(Case T-331/18) (1)

((Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Failure by the Commission to adopt appropriate measures to ensure compliance, by Hungarian courts, with Article 13 of Directive 2005/29/EC and the relevant national transposition measure - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 93/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: István Szécsi (Szeged, Hungary) and Nóra Somossy (Szeged) (represented by: D. Lazar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Bertelmann and N. Ruiz García, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the breach by the Commission of its supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr István Szécsi and Ms Nóra Somossy shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr István Szécsi and Ms Nóra Somossy shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended January31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of theRegistrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on myknowledge:

 

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: March 11, 2005 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | Todd E. Wille           |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to UnifyCorporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
02/2023 Foodstuffs on Aircraft Exempted from Removal as Regulated Garbage 1

Foodstuffs on Aircraft Exempted from Removal as Regulated 

Garbage

Unused meals and other foodstuffs carried aboard aircraft in the galley are 

subject to removal as garbage unless a compliance agreement to allow backcatering is approved. Garbage is regulated by the United States Department of 

Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) under Title 

7 Code of Federal Regulations 330.400–330.403 and Title 9 Code of Federal 

Regulations 94.5. Unused meals, foodstuffs and other agricultural 

commodities carried in the cargo hold must be presented as cargo. These 

commodities are not exempt from APHIS regulations under V.S.I.E. (vessel 

supplies for immediate export) and must meet all U.S. import requirements.

The following commodities are exempted from these regulations and are 

allowed to remain aboard. The foodstuffs and beverages listed below must not

be commingled/contaminated with APHIS regulated garbage. If they are 

contaminated with APHIS regulated garbage, then they are regulated.

Beverages

Alcoholic drinks

Coffee

Juice

Soda

Tea

Ultra-high temperature (UHT)-pasteurized dairy creamers (shelf stable)1

UHT-pasteurized milk (shelf stable)1

Water

Condiments

Gum syrup

Horseradish

Individual dry dairy creamers

Individual jam/preserves portions (honey, strawberry, marmalade)

Individual salad dressings (with or without dairy ingredients)

Ketchup

Mustard

Non-dairy creamers

1 Milk and dairy creamer must be UHT-pasteurized to be exempted.
Foodstuffs on Aircraft Exempted from Removal as Regulated Garbage

2 Foodstuffs on Aircraft Exempted from Removal as Regulated Garbage 02/2023

Salt, sugar, pepper

Soy sauce

Tabasco sauce

Wasabi

Worcestershire sauce (Worcester sauce)

Prepackaged Snacks

Cheese spread (shelf stable, without liquid)

Chips

Cookies

Crackers

Fruit cups (shelf stable)

Fully baked pastries without fillings

Gummy fruit snacks

Nuts

Pretzels

Processed Foods

Candy (e.g., after dinner mints)

Caviar

Chocolate bars/chocolates

Commercially labeled, shelf-stable (not requiring refrigeration), fully 

finished dry food products containing dry milk powder

Cooked rice

Drink mixes (including dried milk)

Dry cereal (e.g., corn flakes)

Hard cheese (which does not contain meat)

Pasteurized processed cheese (which does not contain meat)

Pickles

Smoked fish products (no cream sauces)

Soup cups without animal product ingredients, including chicken, pork, 

beef, other meats, and eggs
# C_2019220EN.01003802.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (WEIN FÜR PROFIS)

(Case T-57/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark WEIN FÜR PROFIS - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Misleading character - Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 220/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Team Beverage AG (Wildeshausen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 (Case R 502/2017-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign WEIN FÜR PROFIS as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Team Beverage AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Team Beverage AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. at December 31, 1996, and its statement of
income for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-K of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,305,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,234
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      17,795,761
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,865,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,523,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,641,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,523,853
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,744,146
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  516,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,326,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,326,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,326,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### State v. Schneidewind

24297

07/17/2002

Vacated and Remanded
EXHIBIT 23.1


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 The Board of Directors
 American HealthChoice, Inc.

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
 December 2, 2005, into the following registration statements filed by you on
 Form S-8: File No.  333-36475 dated September 29,  1997; File No.  333-35581
 dated September 18, 1997; File No. 333-26061 dated April 30, 1997; File  No.
 333-26065 dated  April 30, 1997; File  No. 333-26043  dated  April 30, 1997;
 File No.  333-26063  dated  April 30,  1997  and  File  No.333-122958  dated
 February 23, 2005


 Lane Gorman Trubitt, L.L.P.
 Dallas, Texas
 July 14, 2006
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-02195,
333-04017, 333-36102, and 333-124909) and Form S-3 (No. 333-126349) of Gehl Company of our
report dated March 2, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement
schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMilwaukee,
WisconsinMarch 2, 2007
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 UnitedStates Code

 

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of EnbridgeEnergy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certifies that thePartnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2003, filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided tothe Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Date: November 13, 2003

 

 
| */s/*  | *Mark A. Maki*                                           |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Mark A. Maki                                             |
|   | Vice President, Finance and  Principal Financial Officer |

 

----