alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
28, 1996 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      641
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,130
<PP&E>                                           1,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                     329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,070
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,967
<SALES>                                          4,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,072
<CGS>                                            3,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (214)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.00)
        

</TABLE>
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

__2_.8_ day _ _,_,M"""a<+y _ __,. 2014 

RESOLUTION NO. 2014-5 

RESOLUTION OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

AMENDING THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE 

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

TO ADOPT RULE 222, FEDERAL EMISSION STATEMENT 

The following resolution is hereby offered and read: 

WHEREAS, the proposed adoption of Rule 222 will implement the requirements of the 

Federal Clean Air Act Section 182 (a)(3)(B) which requires that states with areas designated as 

nonattainment for ozone require emissions data from sources of oxides of nitrogen and volatile 

organic compounds located in the nonattainment areas; and 

WHEREAS, this Board finds that the Rule has been composed and amended to the extent 

reasonably practicable, and are written in plain English wherever feasible, in order to assure that the 

Rule can be easily understood by the persons directly affected by said Rule; and 

WHEREAS, Section 40001 of the California Health and Safety code establishes authority for 

the District to adopt the Rule; and 

WHEREAS, the Rule, as written and amended, is consistent with existing statutes, court 

decisions, and State and Federal Regulations; and 

WHEREAS, the Rule, as written, does not result in duplication of existing State or Federal 

statutes or regulations in that the Rule does not impose the same requirements as an existing State 

or Federal Regulation, except to the extent that the Rule is necessary or proper to execute the 

powers and duties granted to and imposed upon the District; and 

WHEREAS, the Rule, as written and amended, is exempt from CEQA under sectiqn 

15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility 

that these changes may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed changes do not 

establish new requirements or require modifications to facilities; and 
WHEREAS, the Board has on this date held and conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing on · 

said amendments to the Rules and Regulations of the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control 

District and has determined the necessity for said amendments. 

WHEREAS, the District has complied with H&SC Sections 40725 through 40728 in adopting 

these regulatory changes; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Air Pollution Control Board of the 

San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District that amendments to the District Rules and 

Regulations, specifically Rule 222, attached hereto, and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit 

A. are hereby adopted to be effective on May 28, 2014. 

On motion of Director Ed Waage . seconded by Director Brnce Gj bson 

and passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: 

Ayes: Directors Arnold, Fonz i , Hamon, Hi11, Christianson, Mecham, Bright, Smukler, 

Noes: Ray 

Absent Director Costello 

Abstaining: 

Attest: 

Approved as to Form and Legal Effect: 

Raymond A. Biering 

District Counsel 

Date:---..L-5--/-) ~~~L.-f--J --"------l :-(-__ TJ 

San Luis Obispo County
Corporate Capital Trust II 8-K


EX-10.1


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE EXPENSE SUPPORT
AND CONDITIONAL

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT


This third amendment
to the Amended and Restated Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement (this “Third Amendment”) is made
as of December 22, 2016, by and among CORPORATE CAPITAL TRUST II, a Delaware statutory trust, (“Company”), CNL FUND
ADVISORS II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CNL”) and KKR CREDIT ADVISORS (US) LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“KKR”).


WHEREAS, the Company,
CNL and KKR are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement dated September
24, 2015 (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the parties
amended the Agreement on May 10, 2016 (the “First Amendment”) and on September 23, 2016 (the “Second Amendment”);
and


WHEREAS, in accordance
with Section 4.5 of the Agreement, the parties desire to further amend the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


1.                  


The reference to “December 31, 2016” in Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted,
and “March 31, 2017” is inserted in the place of such deleted reference.


2.                  



Full Force and Effect. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect. All capitalized terms shall mean the same as in the Agreement. 


3.                  



Counterparts. This Third Amendment may be executed in more than one counterpart, each
of which will be deemed to be an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. This Third Amendment
may also be executed electronically. 


4.                  


Governing Law. This Third Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflict of law provisions.


[remainder of page blank; signatures
follow]




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


	 	CNL FUND ADVISORS II, LLC 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Steven D. Shackelford
	 	Name:	Steven D. Shackelford
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	KKR CREDIT ADVISORS (US) LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Nicole J. Macarchuk
	 	Name:	Nicole J. Macarchuk
	 	Title:	Authorized Signatory 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	CORPORATE CAPITAL TRUST II
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Thomas K Sittema
	 	Name:	Thomas K. Sittema
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 4.5


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.


Alimera Sciences, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:
FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Alimera Sciences, Inc.
SECOND: The date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was originally filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is June 4, 2003, under the name of Alimera Sciences, Inc.
THIRD: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted a resolution setting forth a proposed amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Restated Certificate”), declaring said amendment to be advisable and in the best interests of the Corporation and its stockholders, and authorized the appropriate officers of the Corporation to solicit the approval of the stockholders therefor, which resolution setting forth the proposed amendment and restatement is as follows:
RESOLVED, that the first paragraph of Article IV of the Restated Certificate be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be designated common stock (“Common Stock”) and preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”). The number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is one hundred fifty million (150,000,000) par value $0.01 per share, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is ten million (10,000,000), par value $0.01 per share.
FOURTH: That thereafter said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware by written consent of the stockholders holding the requisite number of shares required by statute given in accordance with and pursuant to Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
                    











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its President and Chief Financial Officer this 16 day of November 2016.
/s/ Richard S. Eiswirth, Jr.                
Richard S. Eiswirth, Jr.
President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020329EN.01001001.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — PO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

(Case C-531/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

---
# C_2020297EN.01001801.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București — Romania) — Cabinet de avocat UR v Administraţia Sector 3 a Finanţelor Publice prin Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Sector 3 a Finanţelor Publice, MJ, NK

(Case C-424/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/112/EC - Value added tax (VAT) - Article 9(1) - Concept of ‘taxable person’ - Person practising the profession of lawyer - Final judicial decision - Principle of res judicata - Scope of that principle if that decision is incompatible with EU law)

(2020/C 297/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cabinet de avocat UR

Defendants: Administraţia Sector 3 a Finanţelor Publice prin Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Sector 3 a Finanţelor Publice, MJ, NK

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a person practising the profession of a lawyer must be regarded as a ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of that provision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a person practising the profession of a lawyer must be regarded as a ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of that provision;

| 2. | EU law precludes a national court, in a dispute relating to value added tax (VAT), from applying the principle of res judicata where that dispute does not relate to a tax period identical to the one which was at issue in the dispute which gave rise to the judicial decision having the authority of res judicata, does not have the same subject matter as that dispute, and where the application of that principle would prevent that court from taking into account EU legislation on VAT. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EU law precludes a national court, in a dispute relating to value added tax (VAT), from applying the principle of res judicata where that dispute does not relate to a tax period identical to the one which was at issue in the dispute which gave rise to the judicial decision having the authority of res judicata, does not have the same subject matter as that dispute, and where the application of that principle would prevent that court from taking into account EU legislation on VAT.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
# C_2010024EN.01001301.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-460/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 39 EC - Employment in the public service - Captain and officer (chief mate) on vessels - Conferment of powers of public authority on board - Requirement that they must be nationals of the Member State whose flag the vessels are flying)

2010/C 24/20

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 39 of the EC Treaty — National legislation which reserves for Greek nationals access to the posts of captain and officer (chief mate) on all commercial and fishing vessels flying the Greek flag

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that in requiring in its legislation Greek nationality for access to the posts of captain and officer (chief mate) on all vessels flying the Greek flag, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law and, in particular, under Article 39 EC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that in requiring in its legislation Greek nationality for access to the posts of captain and officer (chief mate) on all vessels flying the Greek flag, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law and, in particular, under Article 39 EC.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 327 of 20.12.2008

1

---
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**FOURTHAMENDMENT**

**OFTHE**

**SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PROFITSHARINGAND 401(K) PLAN**

(As Amended andRestated Effective January 1, 2001) 

 

**WHEREAS**, Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”); and 

 

**WHEREAS**, the Company hasdelegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 

 

**NOW,THEREFORE**, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Section 10.01 of the Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the Committee, the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended effectiveJanuary 1, 2003, in the following particulars:****

 

1. By substituting the following sentence for the second sentence of Section 2.01 of the Plan: 

 

“Each Employee of Sky Insurance shall participate in the Plan on or after January 1, 2003, solely in accordance with Section2.04.” 

 

2. By substituting the following forSection 2.04 of the Plan: 

 

**“2.04 Eligibility for Employees of Sky Insurance.**Effective January 1, 2003, each Employee of Celaris Group, Inc., Value Added Benefits, Ltd. and Picton Cavanaugh, and their successors, including Sky Insurance, willbecome a Participant according to the following: 

 

(a) Each Employee shall be eligible to make Compensation Deferral Contributions provided for under Section 3.02 hereof and to receive Employer Matching Contributions provided for under Section 3.03 beginning with the first day theEmployee completes an Hour of Service, or on the first Entry Date thereafter, if the Employee meets both of the following requirements: 

(i) the Employee has attained age 18 years; and 

 

(ii) the Employee is not a member of acollective bargaining unit unless the collective bargaining agreement between the Employer and the union provides for participation in this Plan. 

 

(b) No Employee shall be eligible to receive Profit Sharing Contributions provided for under Section 3.04 of the Plan,unless the Employee’s employment agreement explicitly provides for such contributions.” 

 

3. By deleting clause (iii) of Section 4.02 of the Plan. 

 

*        *        *

 

I, Thomas A. Sciorilli, on behalf of theSky Financial Group, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee, hereby certify that the foregoing is a correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Committee on November 13, 2002 and that the resolution has not been changed or repealed. 

 

**SKYFINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

**BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE**

By:
 
 
  
A Member of the Committee

 

-2-
EPRI TCLP Results Mined Gypsum

units 279 281 283 285 287 289 291 293 295 301 303 pH 5.4 5.0 6.4 6.7 5.4 6.9 7.5 5.6 7.0 6.4 6.5 Ag mg/L <0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017<0.017 As mg/L <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Ba mg/L 0.08 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.04 0.10 0.02 0.05 0.11 0.05 0.02 Cd mg/L 0.01 <0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037<0.0037 Cr mg/L <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 Pb mg/L <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 Se mg/L <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089 <0.089
Hg ug/L 0.015 0.015 0.011 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.011 0.018 0.011 0.011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Teofilio Manon, Appellant.

— Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered on December 18, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of violation of probation and sentencing defendant on a February 11, 1987 conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from *lYa*to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Judgment of the same court and Justice, rendered on May 11, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 1 to 3 years, to be served consecutively to the above sentence, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Ross and Kassal, JJ.
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4285 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica Hill, New Jersey, as the ‘‘James C. ‘Billy’ Johnson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4285 EH

1 SECTION 1. JAMES C. ‘‘BILLY’’ JOHNSON POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 123 Bridgeton Pike in Mullica 

5 Hill, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘James C. ‘Billy’ Johnson Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James C. ‘Billy’ John11 son Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4285 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Post-

‘Billy’ Johnson Post Office Building’’. Mullica Hill, New Jersey, as the ‘‘James C. al Service located at 123 Bridgeton Pike in