alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lewis E. BERRY, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12525.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 20, 1957.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1958.

Thomas G. Hanlon, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

POWELL, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Lewis E. Berry, was charged by information in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. Defendant filed a motion to suppress, and it was stipulated that the evidence on that hearing might be considered as the evidence in the trial. The defendant testified only to the fact that his address in Tulsa: 5201 South Utica Street, was actually located outside the city of Tulsa.

The State called Deputy Sheriff William L. Bliss, who testified to searching defendant’s home under authority of a search warrant, and finding the quantity of whiskey set out in the information.

True copy of the affidavit for search warrant, and of the search warrant were by stipulation introduced and received in evidence. The affidavit was on a printed form.

The court found the defendant guilty as-charged, and fixed his punishment at a fine of $100, and thirty days confinement in the Tulsa County jail.

The only ground for reversal is that the affidavit for search warrant was on a printed form, though filled in to list the name of appellant and to give his address.

*731While we have a number of times said that the affiant should strike from a printed form of an affidavit for search warrant any allegations not applicable to the particular case, and add others peculiar to the case at hand, nevertheless where the allegations are sufficient to meet the requirements of the statute, though by printed form, objections to the sufficiency of the affidavit should be overruled. Addington v. State, Okl.Cr., 268 P.2d 912.

We find the affidavit for search warrant and the search warrant sufficient to support the court’s action in overruling the motion to suppress, and the evidence sufficient to support the judgment rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, W. Edd Helms, Jr. certify that:


1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc.;


2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;


     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):


     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and


     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and


6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
     annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
     or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
     subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.


Date: August 29, 2003


/s/W. Edd Helms, Jr.
---------------------------------
W. Edd Helms, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32


  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                                     OF 2002

      Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aura Systems, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: March 17, 2005                             /s/ Dennis Calvert
                                                 ------------------
                                                 Dennis Calvert
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 17, 2005                             /s/ Dennis Calvert
                                                 ------------------
                                                 Dennis Calvert
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5211]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   LET'S WORK TOGETHER TO FIGHT AIDS

  (Ms. BONAMICI asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Ms. BONAMICI. This is an important week for the United States as we 
host the International AIDS Conference for the first time in 22 years.
  Decades ago, our country made the shameful decision that no one who 
is HIV positive could enter our borders. With the President's lifting 
of that ban and a greater attention to the AIDS crisis, along with the 
advent of drugs that help those with HIV live longer, we are 
approaching what we should have always been--a global leader in the 
fight against AIDS.
  Countless Oregonians have been affected by AIDS. I've personally lost 
friends to AIDS, and as of June 30, more than 5,600 people in Oregon 
were living with HIV. It's time to eliminate the stigma associated with 
HIV/AIDS and to focus on prevention, treatment, and care.
  The participants of the conference this week show immense dedication 
to the fight against HIV and AIDS, both in the U.S. and abroad. 
Congress should have the same dedication. Funding for prevention and 
treatment programs is crucial, as is funding for medical research and 
drug development.
  We've come a long way, but there is still a lot of work to do. I urge 
my colleagues to join me. Speak out. Help to end the stigma. Let's work 
together to fight AIDS.

                          ____________________
```
#### Heatherly v. Hilton Hawaiian Village Joint Venture

16929

5/17/95

Partially Granted

893 P.2d 779
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certifies that the Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Date: November 5, 2004                                                    |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/DAN C. TUTCHERDan C. Tutcher
President and Principal Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
# C_2021138EN.01001301.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/13

---

Order of the Court (Tenth chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucaresti — Romania) — Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi

(Case C-108/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 33 - Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out - Supply of goods with transport - Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier - Sale through a website - Contract for the carriage of goods concluded by the buyer with a company suggested by the supplier)

(2021/C 138/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Defendants: Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi

Operative part of the order

Article 33 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, as regards goods sold through a website by a supplier established in a Member State to buyers located in another Member State, when, for the purposes of delivering those goods, those buyers, in accordance with the dispatching options offered by the supplier, choose a company suggested by that website with which they conclude a contract separate from the one which bounds them to that supplier for the purchase of those goods, the latter must be regarded as transported ‘by or on behalf of the supplier’, within the meaning of Article 33, where the role of that supplier is predominant in terms of initiating and organising the essential stages of the transport of those goods, which it is for the referring court to ascertain, taking account of all the relevant circumstances of the dispute in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.

---
Import Alert: HPAI Restrictions on Avian Commodities Originating from or Transiting 

Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan

Issuance Date: March 13, 2024

9:09 AM, U.S. Eastern

Effective Date: March 12, 2024—Hiroshima Prefecture

Effective on the date(s) listed above and until further notice, the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is restricting the importation 

of poultry, commercial birds, ratites, avian hatching eggs, unprocessed avian products and 

byproducts, and certain fresh poultry products originating from or transiting the prefecture(s) 

listed above due to the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in domestic birds.

Under these restrictions, processed avian products and byproducts originating from or transiting 

any restricted prefecture and imported as cargo must be accompanied by an APHIS import 

permit and/or government certification confirming that the commodities were treated in 

accordance with APHIS requirements. 

Importation as cargo of fresh, unprocessed shell/table eggs and other egg products, void of the 

shell (i.e., liquid eggs and dried egg whites), originating from or transiting any restricted 

prefecture is prohibited unless they are consigned from the port of arrival directly to an APHISapproved breaking and pasteurization facility. An import permit and/or certificate is not required 

for these shipments when consigned directly to an APHIS-approved establishment.

Processed avian products and byproducts, including eggs and egg products, for personal use 

originating from or transiting a restricted prefecture, entering in passenger baggage, must: 

• have a thoroughly cooked appearance; or 

• be shelf-stable as a result of APHIS-approved packaging and cooking (i.e., packaged in 

hermetically sealed containers and cooked by a commercial method after such packing to 

produce articles that are shelf stable without refrigeration); or 

• be accompanied by an APHIS import permit and/or government certification confirming 

that the products or byproducts were treated in accordance with APHIS requirements.

Unprocessed avian products and byproducts originating from or transiting a restricted prefecture 

are not permitted to enter the United States. This includes hunter harvested, non-fully finished 

avian trophies and meat.

Importation of poultry, commercial birds, ratites, and hatching eggs originating from or 

transiting any restricted prefecture is prohibited. However, pet and zoo birds, pigeons, and doves 

may be imported under an APHIS import permit and will be subject to a 30-day quarantine at the 

New York Animal Import Center in Newburgh, NY, or the Miami Animal Import Center in 

Miami, FL. 
These restrictions will be updated as additional epidemiological information is obtained. 

Additional information can be found on the APHIS website.
Leonard Osser
                                  44 Kean Road
                         Short Hills, New Jersey 07078

                                 April 5, 2000

Milestone Scientific, Inc.
230 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, New Jersey 07039
Attn: Thomas Stuckey, Chief Financial Officer

                  Re: Milestone Scientific Inc. ("Milestone")

Dear Sirs:

      The undersigned hereby provide the following undertaking in connection
with your audit of the financial statements of the above corporation for year
ended December 31, 1999.

1.    Leonard Osser ("Osser") hereby agrees to open a $200,000 Line of Credit
      for benefit of Milestone. There shall be no facility fee. However,
      Borrowings under the line shall bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
      payable at maturity. The Line of Credit shall end on December 31, 2000 and
      all the borrowings then outstanding shall be paid by February 1, 2001.
      Milestone shall draw-down amounts against the line by providing Osser with
      written notice at his home address and funds shall be provided within 7
      days of notice.

2.    If Milestone shall provide Osser with notice that it reasonably expects to
      require funds in excess of those available to it under the above Line of
      Credit prior to December 31, 2000, then upon receipt of such notice Osser
      will begin to defer the entire base salary to which he is presently
      entitled under his employment agreement. On the commencement of that
      deferral, his present agreement to waive a portion of his salary shall be
      canceled and extinguished and the deferral shall be in the full amount of
      his salary with regard to that prior salary reduction. All amounts
      deferred shall be payable by Milestone on January 3, 2001.

3.    Osser hereby guarantes the payment in full of all amounts owned to
      Milestone by Dentmate, Inc. (Milestone's Taiwanese distributor) and IME
      Corporation (Milestone's China distributor) whether now owing or owing at
      any time prior to December 31, 2000.

4.    Osser hereby agrees to defer until January 3, 2001 all prepayments owed
      to him under the 10% Secured Promissory Notes issued in February 2000.

5.    Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP, hereby agrees to defer until January
      3, 2001, all payment owed to it on $50,000 face amount of the 10% secured
      Promissory Note issued in February, 2000.

                                     Very truly yours,

                                     /s/ Leonard Osser
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                                 Leonard Osser

                                     MORSE, ZELNICK, ROSE & LANDER LLP

                                     by: /s/ Stephen A. Zelnick
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                                Stephen A. Zelnick

cc: Grant Thornton -- Attn: Chet Borgida
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

and

CHINA AIRLINES LTD.

for a statement of authorization pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 212 (U.S.-Taiwan codesharing) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2002-11459

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Jeff Hann-Yeh Ho Vice President, The Americas CHINA AIRLINES, LTD.

200 N. Continental Boulevard El Segundo, CA 90245

George U. Carneal

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 637-6546 george.carneal@hoganlovells.com

Counsel for CHINA AIRLINES, LTD. Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel Jeff Morgan Regional Director – Government Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

August 5, 2010BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

and

CHINA AIRLINES LTD.

for a statement of authorization pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 212 (U.S.-Taiwan codesharing) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2002-11459

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta Air Lines,

Inc. (“Delta”) and China Airlines, Ltd. (“China Airlines”), the carriers hereby notify the

Department that, on or after 30 days from today, Delta plans to display its designator

code, on a blind-sector basis, on China Airlines operated flights on the following routes:

 Tokyo, Japan (NRT) – Kaohsiung, Taiwan (KHH) and

 Taipei, Taiwan (TPE) – Naha, Okinawa, Japan (OKA).

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ George U. Carneal

______________________ George U. Carneal

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

Counsel for CHINA AIRLINES, LTD. Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Notice has been served this 5th day of August, 2010, upon the following persons via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; jeffrey.manley@united.com; hkamen@coair.com; dan.weiss@coair.com; howard.kass@usairways.com; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; John.Allen@faa.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov;
info@airlineinfo.com
ex10-w.htm


Exhibit 10.2

   

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT AGREEMENT

 

            THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”), dated as of December 20, 2016, is made by and between Hickok Incorporated, an Ohio corporation (“Hickok”), and Roundball LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“Roundball”). 

 

            WHEREAS, Hickok and Roundball are parties to that certain Warrant Agreement, dated as of December 30, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated December 30, 2015 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Roundball was granted the right and warrant to purchase from Hickok up to, subject to adjustment provided therein, One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares of Hickok’s Class A Common Stock, without par value, at a purchase price per share of $2.50; and 

 

            WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Expiration Date (as defined in the Agreement) with respect to the exercise of such rights by Roundball.    

 

 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:  

 

            (a)        Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

 

            (b)        Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:  

 

“Expiration.  This Warrant shall expire at the close of business on December 30, 2017 (the “Expiration Date”), and shall be void thereafter.” 

 

            (c)        The parties agree that the amendments set forth herein shall apply from and after December 20, 2016, and that nothing contained herein shall be deemed to modify or waive any rights or obligations under the Agreement existing prior to that date. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment by their duly authorized officers as of the date first above written. 

 

 

	HICKOK INCORPORATED	 	 	ROUNDBALL LLC 	 
	 	
 
	
 
	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	By:	
   /s/ Brian Powers
	
 
	
 
	By:	
   /s/ Fredrick Widen
	
 

	 	
Brian Powers,  
	
 
	
 
	 	
Frederick Widen, 
	
 

	 	
President and CEO 
	
 
	
 
	 	
Manager 
	
 



 

 

1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 20, 2020

Order 

Clerk

November 20, 2020

161716(61)

RENEE SWAIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

SC: 161716

v COA: 346850

Oakland CC: 2017-158765-CZ

MICHAEL MORSE, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

MARK ZARKIN and STEVEN LELLIS 

ON THE GREEN, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees to extend the time 

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on October 29, 2020, is accepted as timely filed.