Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 88113 

of the infringement of certain claims of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 9,831,306 (‘‘the ’306 

patent’’); 10,319,812 (‘‘the ’812 patent’’); 

10,700,178; and 11,251,281. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon-si, 

Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 

Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 

(collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’); Taiwan 

Semiconductor Manufacturing 

Company Limited of Hsinchu City, 

Taiwan and TSMC North America of 

San Jose, California (collectively, 

‘‘TSMC’’). The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party in 

this investigation. 

Subsequently, the investigation was 

terminated with respect to the ’306 and 

the ’812 patents. Order No. 35 (June 9, 

2023), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(July 10, 2023). Furthermore, the ALJ 

granted Complainant’s motion for 

summary determination that the TSMC 

respondents are not licensed to the 

asserted patents. Order No. 49 (July 17, 

2023), reviewed and, on review, vacated 

in part and affirmed in part with 

modified reasoning by Comm’n Notice 

(August 23, 2023). Also, the 

investigation was terminated with 

respect to the Samsung respondents. 

Order No. 52 (August 7, 2023), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Sep. 5, 

2023). 

On October 18, 2023, Daedalus and 

the TSMC respondents (Daedalus and 

TSMC together, the ‘‘Moving Parties’’) 

filed a joint motion to, inter alia, 

terminate the investigation based on 

settlement. (‘‘Mot.’’). On October 24, 

2023, OUII filed a response supporting 

the motion. (‘‘Staff Resp.’’). 

On November 14, 2023, the ALJ 

issued an ID (Order No. 78) granting the 

joint motion. The ID noted that, 

consistent with Commission Rule 

210.21(b)(1), Daedalus and TSMC attach 

a copy of a Settlement and Patent 

License Agreement, a Patent Purchase 

Agreement, and two binding Term 

Sheets as Exhibits 1–4 to their motion. 

ID at 2. The ID further noted that, in 

addition, pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.21(b)(1), the motion states that 

‘‘[t]here are no other agreements, written 

or oral, express or implied, between 

Daedalus and TSMC concerning the 

subject matter of this Investigation.’’ Id. 

(citing Mot. at 2). 

The ID further noted that Daedalus 

and TSMC submit that termination 

‘‘will not adversely affect the public 

interest’’ and that ‘‘[t]ermination will 

also conserve Commission resources, 

including those of the Administrative 

Law Judge and the Commission 

Investigative Staff, as well as those of 

the Moving Parties.’’ Id. (citing Mot. at 

2–3). The ID noted that in its response 

to the Moving Parties’ motion to 

terminate, OUII states that ‘‘Staff is not 

aware of any reason why termination of 

this investigation on the basis of the 

Agreements would be contrary to the 

public health and welfare, competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, the 

production of like or directly 

competitive articles in the United 

States, or U.S. consumers[ ]’’ and that 

‘‘the public interest favors settlement to 

avoid unnecessary litigation and to 

conserve public and private resources.’’ 

Id. (citing Staff Resp. at 4). The ID found 

no evidence of any adverse impact on 

the public interest from the termination 

of the investigation and granted the 

motion thus terminating the 

investigation. Id. at 2–3. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. The investigation is 

hereby terminated. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on December 

14, 2023. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 14, 2023. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2023–27897 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–0220] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension of a 

Previously Approved Collection; 

Bureau of Justice Assistance 

Application Form: Public Safety 

Officers Educational Assistance 

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Assistance, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, 

Department of Justice (DOJ), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until 

February 20, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Hope D. Janke, Director, Public Safety 

Officers’ Benefits Office, Bureau of 

Justice Assistance, Office of Justice 

Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 

810 7th Street NW, Washington, DC 

20531, telephone: (202) 307–2858, or 

email: hope.d.janke@usdoj.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Abstract: BJA’s Public Safety Officers’ 

Benefits (PSOB) Office will use the 

PSOEA Application information to 

confirm the eligibility of applicants to 

receive PSOEA benefits. Eligibility is 

dependent on several factors, including 

the applicant, as a spouse or child, 

having received or being eligible to 

receive a portion of the PSOB Death 

Benefit, or having a spouse or parent 

who received the PSOB Disability 

Benefit. Also considered are the 

applicant’s age and the schools being 

attended. In addition, information to 

help BJA identify an individual is 

collected, such as contact numbers and 

email addresses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Public Safety Officers’ Educational 

Assistance (PSOEA). 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
88114 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

None. The applicable component within 

the Department of Justice is the Bureau 

of Justice Assistance, in the Office of 

Justice Programs. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Dependents of public 

safety officers who were killed or 

permanently and totally disabled in the 

line of duty. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that no more 

than 300 respondents will apply a year. 

Each application takes approximately 30 

minutes to complete. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated public burden 

associated with this collection is 150 

hours. It is estimated that respondents 

will take 30 minutes to complete an 

application. The burden hours for 

collecting respondent data sum to 150 

hours (300 respondents × 0.5 hours = 

150 hours). 

7. An estimate of the total annual cost 

burden associated with the collection, if 

applicable: No cost burden associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Darwin Arceo, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W–218, 

Washington, DC. 

Dated: December 14, 2023. 

Darwin Arceo, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2023–27945 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[[OMB Number 1190–0021] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Revision of a 

Previously Approved Collection; 

Generic Clearance for Community 

Relations Service Program Impact 

Evaluation 

AGENCY: Community Relations Service, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Community Relations 

Service, Department of Justice (DOJ), 

will be submitting the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until 

February 20, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Jordan Mathews, Community Relations 

Service, 145 N St. NE, Washington, DC 

20002, 771–208–9190 or 

Jordan.M.Mathews@usdoj.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Abstract: Over the next three years, 

CRS and its evaluation contractor, 

Mathematica, anticipate collecting 

program impact evaluation data for 

assessing ongoing programs across 

several areas within community 

outreach. The purpose of these 

collections is to gather feedback from 

participants who attended CRS 

programs and to use that information to 

assess the impact and outcomes of the 

programs. The work may entail 

redesigning and/or modifying existing 

programs based upon received feedback. 

CRS envisions using surveys, 

interviews, and other electronic data 

collection instruments. In this revision, 

CRS is requesting an increased level of 

burden from the previously approved 

collection to reflect including a larger 

number of programs in the assessment 

and collecting information at multiple 

time points for an individual program to 

assess change over time. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a previously approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Generic Clearance for Community 

Relations Service Program Impact 

Evaluation. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form numbers not available for generic 

clearance. The applicable component 

within the Department of Justice is the 

Community Relations Service. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as the 

obligation to respond: Affected Public: 

Participants of CRS programs in relevant 

jurisdictional fields; individuals; 

facilitators; state and local law 

enforcement, government officials, faith 

leaders, and community leaders; 

students; school administrators; and 

representatives of advocacy 

organizations. The obligation to respond 

is voluntary. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: We estimate that up to 1,227 

individuals will be involved in the data 

collection annually over the three-year 

clearance period. The average time per 

response for surveys is 15 minutes, 

while the average time per response for 

interviews is 60 minutes. 

6. An estimate of the total annual 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The total annual burden 

hours for this collection is 515 hours. 

7. An estimate of the total annual cost 

burden associated with the collection, if 

applicable: $28,100. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1