alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  FROM  THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS  AT  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE
YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       <CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1 
<CASH>                                        5377 
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         623 
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               400 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0 
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  27102 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       27102 
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           792 
<LOANS>                                     130669 
<ALLOWANCE>                                   1827 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              170485 
<DEPOSITS>                                  140243 
<SHORT-TERM>                                  7386 
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2182 
<LONG-TERM>                                   5000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0 
<PREFERRED>                                      0 
<COMMON>                                      3039 
<OTHER-SE>                                   12635 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              170485 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              12275 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1568 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               573 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             14416 
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            6431 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            6802 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         7614 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  290 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               5826 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               2906 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    2906 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0 
<CHANGES>                                        0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  1895 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .63 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .53 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4 
<LOANS-NON>                                      0 
<LOANS-PAST>                                   483 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0 
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1728 
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  408 
<RECOVERIES>                                   217 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             1827 
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          1827 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0 
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0 
        


</TABLE>
# C_2018373EN.01001102.xml

| 15.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/11

---

Action brought on 6 July 2018 — PT v European Investment Bank (EIB)

(Case T-418/18)

(2018/C 373/12)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: PT (represented by: E. Nordh, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the EIB of 4 April 2018 dismissing the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the EIB of 4 April 2018 dismissing the applicant;

| — | Order the defendant to compensate the applicant for material harm amounting at present to EUR 2 240,31 and non-material harm evaluated at EUR 50 000, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to compensate the applicant for material harm amounting at present to EUR 2 240,31 and non-material harm evaluated at EUR 50 000, and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the action. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the action.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging disregard of the rights of the defence






  — | The applicant claims that the defendant did not give the applicant the opportunity of defending himself against its allegations under the best possible conditions. The applicant is of the opinion that his right to sound administration was thereby breached. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging disregard of the rights of the defence

—

The applicant claims that the defendant did not give the applicant the opportunity of defending himself against its allegations under the best possible conditions. The applicant is of the opinion that his right to sound administration was thereby breached.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment






  — | The applicant claims that, in connection with the defendant’s disregard of his rights of the defence, it also committed a number of manifest errors of assessment. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment

—

The applicant claims that, in connection with the defendant’s disregard of his rights of the defence, it also committed a number of manifest errors of assessment.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0721 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. COLBY SCOTT DEVLIN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 23 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0721
Exhibit 11

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE
EARNINGS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31



|                                                                            |  |      |             |  |      |  |             | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- |  | ---- |  | ----------- | 
|                                                                            |  | 2011 |             |  | 2010 | 
|A Net income as reported ($ millions)                                       |  |      | 3,081       |  |      |  | 1,775       | 
|B Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding                       |  |      | 855,677,000 |  |      |  | 886,371,000 | 
|C Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation |  |      | 20,960,000  |  |      |  | 24,722,000  | 
|                                                                            |  |     
|IFRS                                                                        |  |      |             |  |      |  |             | 
|Basic earnings per share (A/B)                                              |  |      | 3.60        |  |      |  | 2.00        | 
|Diluted earnings per share (A/(B+C))                                        |  |      | 3.51        |  |      |  | 1.95        |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

I, Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

August 9, 2010By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER Christopher R. Gardner Chief Executive Officer


I,
Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

August 9, 2010By:

RICHARD C. YONKER Richard C. Yonker Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00051-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.A.S. and B.J.S., Children

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-09-00242-CVK

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED May 3, 2022.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
November 4, 1999

VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO. 800.86

Subject: Exemption from Mycoplasma Testing Under 9 CFR 113.200(c)(3)

To: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum clarifies Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) policy for obtaining an

exemption to the requirement for testing inactivated viral vaccines for mycoplasma

contamination.

II. CANCELLATION 

This memorandum cancels Veterinary Biologics Memorandum No. 800.86 dated 

January 4, 1996.

III. BACKGROUND

Under 9 CFR 113.200(c)(3), the harvest fluids used in the production of killed virus

vaccines must be tested for mycoplasma contamination according to 9 CFR 113.28 prior to

adding the killing agent. However, the regulations provide for the granting of an exemption

to this requirement if the licensee or permittee demonstrates "that the agent used to kill the

vaccine virus would also kill mycoplasma." This memorandum clarifies CVB policy

concerning the exemption from mycoplasma testing for inactivated viral vaccines. Note

that this exemption only applies to the testing of vaccine virus prior to adding the killing

agent and not to the testing of Master Seeds, Master Cell Stocks, primary cells, or

ingredients of animal origin.

IV. POLICY

To obtain an exemption to the requirement for testing inactivated viral vaccines for

mycoplasma contamination: 

A. Validate the Inactivation Process

The licensee or permittee must show that the procedure described in the Outline of

Production for vaccine virus inactivation will also inactivate mycoplasma. 
Veterinary Services Memorandum No. 800.86 2

B. Verify Proper Performance in the Outline of Production 

The Outline of Production must indicate an acceptable method that the firm will use to

verify the proper performance of the inactivation procedure. The method indicated in the

Outline of Production can be the mandatory in-process test for vaccine virus inactivation if

the licensee or permittee has submitted data indicating that mycoplasma are at least as

sensitive as the vaccine virus to the inactivation procedure.

C. Submit Protocols

Before initiating studies to establish the appropriateness of the inactivation procedure and

the verification method, licensees, permittees, and applicants should submit protocols to

CVB for review and comment.

1. Indicate Mycoplasma Species - The protocols should indicate the 

species of mycoplasma to be employed. 

2. Mycoplasma Species to Use - The mycoplasma species selected should 

include species recognized as common cell culture contaminants as well as those 

found in the animal(s) for which the product is intended.

D. Document Exemptions

If CVB grants an exemption from mycoplasma testing for a product under 9 CFR

113.200(c)(3), Part V of the Outline of Production for the product should indicate the date

the exemption was granted.

 /s/ Thomas E. Walton for

Alfonso Torres

Deputy Administrator

Veterinary Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      21,661,671               1,130,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,545,264               6,491,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (300,995)                (70,237)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,705,470               5,160,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,299,253              13,437,411
<PP&E>                                       4,729,259               2,389,289
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,247,408               1,041,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,165,014              20,443,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,022,075               5,204,432
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    43,889,754               4,690,786
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,436,934               5,360,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,165,014              20,443,672
<SALES>                                     52,814,568              31,331,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,814,568              31,331,793
<CGS>                                       24,910,271              14,510,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,060,321              21,687,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               223,004                  56,933
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             508,677                 839,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                768,865               5,968,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                   307,000               2,387,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            768,685               3,580,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   461,685               3,580,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10                    1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09                    0.97
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019230EN.01004601.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — mobile.de v EUIPO (Representation of a car in a speech bubble)

(Case T-629/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a car in a speech bubble - Admissibility of the action before the Board of Appeal - Article 49(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Restriction of the list of goods or services covered by the mark applied for - Article 27(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Obligation to adjudicate on a request for restriction)

(2019/C 230/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: mobile.de GmbH (Dreilinden, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 August 2018 (Case R 2653/2017-4), concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing a car in a speech bubble.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 August 2018 (Case R 2653/2017-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 August 2018 (Case R 2653/2017-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

---
#### *Jerry*Lee JOHNSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12550.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 12, 1958.

Tom Smith, Wewoka, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Jerry Lee Johnson, defendant below, was charged by information in the County Court of Seminole County, Oklahoma with the offense of operating a motor vehicle without a driver’s license, said offense being allegedly committed on or about June 30, 1956. A jury was waived, a motion to quash interposed and overruled, a demurrer filed and overruled, and defendant stipulated to the truth of the facts alleged in the information. The defendant was found guilty by the trial court and sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs. Judgment and sentence *979were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

This case is a companion case to the one styled Johnson v. State of Oklahoma, 321 P.2d 976. For the reasons stated therein, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

POWELL and NIX, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The  Board  of  Directors
Summit  Financial  Corporation


We  consent  to  incorporation  by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-83538,  33-94962,  and  33-94964) on Form S-8 of Summit Financial Corporation
and  subsidiaries  of  our  report  dated  January 28, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated  balance sheets of Summit Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as
of  December  31,  2002  and  2001,  and  the related consolidated statements of
income,  shareholders'  equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each
of  the  years  in  the  three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears  in  the  December  31,  2002 Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of  Summit
Financial  Corporation  and  subsidiaries.

Our  report  refers  to  the  fact  that  on January 1, 2002 the Company adopted
Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  142,  "Goodwill  and Other
Intangible  Assets".


/s/  KPMG  LLP

Greenville,  South  Carolina
March  17,  2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tony Webb, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered March 1, 1990, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   1,674,456
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      25,136
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                         2,671,966
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              4,712,586
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                 52,986,728
<ALLOWANCE>                                750,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          64,818,663
<DEPOSITS>                              57,648,953
<SHORT-TERM>                                56,549
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        235,546
<LONG-TERM>                              1,631,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    56,032
<OTHER-SE>                               5,189,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          64,818,663
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          3,467,887
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          222,544
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            92,444
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         3,782,875
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       1,695,647
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,776,495
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    2,006,380
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              166,934
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         (10,338)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          1,471,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            549,325
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 549,325
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               338,055
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                413,531
<LOANS-PAST>                                 5,814
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            90,475
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            686,135
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           610,396
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               39,996
<RECOVERIES>                                13,551
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          750,885
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       594,177
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    156,708


</TABLE>