alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF
GIANT INDUSTRIES, INC.
(a Delaware corporation) Jurisdiction of
    
    Names Under WhichSubsidiary
    
    Incorporation
    
    Company Does BusinessGiant Industries Arizona, Inc.
    
    Arizona
    
    Giant Refining CompanyCiniza Pipe Line CompanyGiant TransportationGiant Service StationsTransWest Tank Lines Giant Four Corners, Inc.*
    
    Arizona Navajo Convenient Stores Co., LLC**
    
    New Mexico Giant Mid-Continent, Inc.*
    
    Arizona Phoenix Fuel Co., Inc.*
    
    Arizona
    
    Phoenix Fuel CompanyMesa Fuel CompanyTucson Fuel CompanyFirebird Fuel CompanyPFC Lubricants Company Ciniza Production Company*
    
    New Mexico Giant Stop-N-Go of New Mexico, Inc.*
    
    New Mexico San Juan Refining Company*
    
    New Mexico Giant Pipeline Company*
    
    New Mexico Giant Yorktown, Inc.*
    
    Delaware Giant Yorktown Holding Company*
    
    Delaware
   *
    
    A wholly-owned subsidiary of Giant Industries Arizona, Inc.**
    
    Giant Four Corners, Inc. has a 66 2/3% interest in this entity.
Permit ID.WL/SEP 000/000000

VETERINARY HEALTH CERTIFICATE FOR EXPORT OF COMMERCIAL BIRDS FROM GUYANA TO UNITED STATES 

1. IDENTIFICATION

QUANTITY SPECIES

2. ORIGIN

• Country of export : GUYANA

• Consignor/Shipper:

• Consignee/Broker:

• Place of Embarkation: CJIA

• Means of transportation: AIR

• Name & address of exporter:

• Name & address of the establishment of origin :

3. DESTINATION

• Country of destination: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

• Name & address of importer:

• Name & address of destination premise:

Official Seal Official Stamp

COOPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

GUYANA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY

ANIMAL HEALTH UNIT

(Animal Health Act, 2011)

PERMIT ID. WL/IHVC: 000/000000

Ph: 592-220-6556, 592-220-2864 Fax: 592-220-6557

E-mail: glda1910@gmail.
 Permit ID.WL/SEP 000/000000

4. HEALTH INFORMATION

The undersigned issuing/official veterinarian certifies for the purposes of this exportation that:

4.1.Exported birds were examined by the veterinarian issuing the certificate within 30 days prior the 

exportation and showed no evidence of communicable disease of poultry at the moment of 

inspection.

4.3.The exported birds did not originate from flocks nor had contact with any birds or poultry originated 

from a control zone established by the animal health authorities due to outbreaks of Newcastle 

disease or Highly Pathogenic Avian Influeanza (HPAI) in the 90 days preceding the exportation.

4.4.The exported birds were not vaccinated against any H5 or H7 subtype of avian influenza.

4.5.CHOOSE EITHER OPTION BELOW (Strikethrough the option that does not apply):

Os pássaros exportados não foram vacinados contra a doença de Newcastle / The exported birds 

were not vaccinated against Newcastle disease. *

or

The exported birds has been vaccinated against Newcastle disease (avian paramyxovirus) at least 21 

days prior to export, using vaccines that do not contain any velogenic strains of Newcastle disease 

virus. *

5. TRANSPORTATION

5.1.The shipment containing the exported birds did not transit through regions where APHIS considers 

of highly pathogenic avian influenza to exist.

5.2.The birds were placed in new or appropriately sanitized packing materials at the premises from which 

the export process began.

6. EMBARKATION

The exported birds were inspected by the veterinary authority of the exporting country within the 24 

hours prior to departure and did not present evidence of communicable diseases among them.

DATE OF VETERINARY INSPECTION PRIOR 

EMBARKATION : .................................

DATE OF EMBARKATION: ............................

Note: Shipments which consists of 5 birds or less shall be imported as pet birds.

PLACE AND DATE OF EMISSION OF HEALTH CERTIFICATE

Official Stamp:

Printed name of issuing veterinarian

Signature of the Issuing Veterinarian

Printed name of the Official Veterinarian

Signature of the Official Veterinarian

This certificate is valid for thirty (30) days from the date thereof.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,William J. Schmidt, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Ibis Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant andhave:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:May 22, 2008

 

 
| /s/  ***William J. Schmidt*** |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| William  J. Schmidt           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SOLOMON N. POWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00324-JRS-1; 3:12-cv-00023-JRS)

Submitted: May 30, 2014 Decided: June 9, 2014

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Solomon N. Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Solomon N. Powell seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction, and denying his motion for reduction of restitution. 

Finding no reversible error, we affirm the portions of the 

district court’s order denying Powell’s motions for a sentence 

reduction and for reduction of restitution. United States v. 

Powell, Nos. 3:07-cr-00324-JRS-1; 3:12-cv-00023-JRS (E.D. Va. 

Mar. 20, 2013).

The portion of the district court’s order denying 

relief on Powell’s § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 
3

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Powell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal of 

the portion of the district court’s order denying relief on 

Powell’s § 2255 motion. We also deny Powell’s motion to include 

the documents attached to the misrouted notice of appeal, as 

those documents are already in the record.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED IN PART;

DISMISSED IN PART
# C_2019423EN.01004302.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 October 2019 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)

(Case T-536/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark FITNESS - Absolute grounds for refusal - Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court - Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal)

(2019/C 423/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: European Food SA (Drăgănești, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, R. Dincă, I.-F. Cofaru, V.-F. Diaconită and V. Stănese, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2018 (Case R 755/2018-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between European Food and Société des produits Nestlé.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 June 2018 (Case R 755/2018-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 June 2018 (Case R 755/2018-2);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Société des produits Nestlé SA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Société des produits Nestlé SA;

| 3. | Orders European Food SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders European Food SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 5.11.2018.

---
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00505- CR

Z ac har y Ev e r e tt , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLI AMSO N COUNTY , 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 04-1 62- K3 68, H ONO RAB LE BURT CARNES, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N
Z acha ry Evere tt seeks to appea l from a judg ment of conviction for injury to a child. The trial c ourt has cer

tified that this is a plea

barg ain ca se and Eve rett has no r ight of appea l. See Tex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2). The cer tification also states that Everett waive d the right of appe al. See id .; Mo nre al v . S

tate , 9 9 S. W.3d 615, 62 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 03 ); se eals o B lan c o v . S tate , 18 S.W. 3d 21 8, 22 0 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 00 ). F ina lly , we no te that the no tic e of a pp e a l w a s n ot t ime ly filed. Se eSla ton v . S

tate , 981 S.W. 2d

20 8 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . S tate , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522-23 (Te x . Crim. App. 1996). The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: September

15, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5292]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. McDERMOTT:
       H.R. 6202.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 1 of Section 8 of Article 1 of the United States 
     Constitution
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfumania Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Donna L. Dellomo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

By: /S/ Donna L. DellomoDonna L. DellomoChief Financial OfficerJune 10, 2011
Read Applicable Notices

•CVB Notice 16-05

•CVB Notice 16-14

•CVB Notice 17-03

Review NCAH Portal Roles

•Determine who in your firm will fillthe roles(i.e. who will be 

entering,reviewing and/or submitting information to the CVB?)

•Review the Description of NCAH Portal Roles User Guide to see 

what the differentroles can do in the Portal to help you determine 

which employeesin your firm will fill each role. 

NCAH Portal Required Roles Must be 

Approved

•Determine if the personnel selected as Liaison/Alternate Liaison and

Sampler have been approved by CVB

•If not, submit APHIS Form 2007(s) requesting authorization as

Liaison, Alternate Liaison and/or Sampler. *This will be routed to

your firm’s Biologics Specialist for processing.

Review 2007s - Submit, if needed

•Determine if all employees that need accessto the NCAH Portal

have APHIS Form 2007s on file with CVB

•If not, submit APHIS Form 2007(s) to CVB per VS Memo 800.63. 

Employees must have verified identity

Login.gov accounts

• Refer to these FAQs for all questions and guidance related to

account creation questions, etc.

Identify one email address to receive

notification emails regarding NCAH Portal 

actions

•One portal email will be sent with a summary of the actionsfor 

that day. If there were no actionsthat day, no email will be sent

•It is suggested that this be a shared company email account so that

more than 1 person receives the information

•If an email address has already been provided for ENSR, that is the

one that will be used

Send email to CVB

•Email CVB.PIMS@usda.gov to request that your firm be enabled to 

use the NCAH Portal for CVB submissions and correspondence

•Be sure to include applicable employees’ full names and their eAuth 

usernamesin the email

Review Training/Guidance Material

•Review the User Guides and Training Videos on the CVB website 

to learn how to do tasksin the NCAH Portal and important 

information regarding recordkeeping 

Receive email notification from CVB 

that your firm has been enabled

Log in to the NCAH Portal

Complete Annual IT Security 

Awareness Training

• The first time you log in to the NCAH Portal you will need to

complete this training and self-certify by clicking the checkbox.

*This training will be required annually after that.

Steps to Becoming a NCAH Portal Enabled Firm for CVB Submissions and Correspondence
# C_2020390EN.01002901.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — ZL v EUIPO

(Case T-596/18) (1)

(Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition - Obligation to state reasons - Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests - Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings)

(2020/C 390/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZL (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of 7 March 2018 of the selection board for competition EUIPO/AD/01/17 — Administrators (AD 6) in the field of intellectual property rejecting the applicant’s request for review of that selection board’s decision of 1 December 2017 not to place her name on the reserve list drawn up with a view to the recruitment of administrators by EUIPO and, secondly, of EUIPO’s decision of 27 June 2018 rejecting her complaints.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ZL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ZL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

---
# C_2020137EN.01004304.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/43

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Raggio di Sole Società Cooperativa Onlus v Comune di Ostuni, Consorzio per L'Inclusione Sociale dell'Ats Fasano — Ostuni — Cisternino, interested party: La Scintilla Soc. Coop. Soc.

(Case C-110/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/64)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE REGISTRANT'S FORM
     10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 9/30/97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                              187,154
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    287,038
<PP&E>                              346,133
<DEPRECIATION>                      154,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,468,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,988,232
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            510,408
<OTHER-SE>                          969,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,468,109
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   39,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (588,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (588,420)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (588,420)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.01)
        


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00394

- CV

Leopoldo PAEZ d/b/a The Colors Lath & Plaster,

Appellant

v.

TRENT SMITH CUSTOM HOMES, LLC

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 18787

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

We order that appellee Trent Sm ith Custom Homes, LLC recover its costs of this appeal

from appellant Leopoldo Paez d/b/a The Colors Lath & Plaster.

SIGNED March 19, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
# C_2019054EN.01002901.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/29

---

Action brought on 7 December 2018 — Aurea Biolabs v EUIPO — Avizel (AUREA BIOLABS)

(Case T-724/18)

(2019/C 54/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd (Cochin, India) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister, L. Oommen, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Avizel SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Application for registration No 15 836 737

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 September 2018 in Case R 814/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the payment of the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the payment of the applicant’s costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---