alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Item_5.2.6.2_Use of the terms ‘fetal’, ‘foetal’, ‘fetus’ and ‘foetus’ / page 1

Annex 21

TERMINOLOGY

[...]

SECTION 9.~~APIDAE~~ APINAE

___________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 11.~~BOVIDAE~~ BOVINAE

___________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 16. CAMELIDAE

Chapter 16.1.	Infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

___________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023	1
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.

                      Agreement to Serve as Rights Agent


     SBS Technologies, Inc., a New Mexico corporation ("Company"), and 
Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA ("Norwest"), agree as follows:

     RECITALS:

          A. Company has entered into a Shareholder Rights Agreement dated
             September 15, 1997.

          B. Company appointed First Security Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah to
             serve as Rights Agent pursuant to that agreement.

          C. First Security Bank has resigned as Rights Agent as of December
             31, 1997.

          D. Company wishes to appoint a successor to serve in that capacity
             on behalf of the Company.

     APPOINTMENT.

          Pursuant to Section 21 of the Shareholder Rights Agreement, Company 
may and hereby does appoint Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA as successor Rights 
Agent, effective upon the signing of this Agreement to Serve as Rights Agent.

     ACCEPTANCE.

          Effective with the signing of this Agreement to Serve as Rights 
Agent, Norwest accepts appointment to serve as Successor Rights Agent and 
agrees to abide by the terms of the Shareholder Rights Agreement.

Dated: January 1, 1998


                                      SBS Technologies


                                      By: /s/ James E. Dixon
                                         --------------------------------

                                      Its: VICE PRESIDENT
                                           FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION
                                          -------------------------------


                                      Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA


                                      By: Karri L. VanDell
                                         --------------------------------
                                      Its: Officer, Shareowner Services
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

      The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the First Quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Fisher Scientific International
Inc. (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ Kevin P. Clark
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Kevin P. Clark
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    May 7, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fisher Scientific International Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2020279EN.01000701.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Union Satellite Centre v KF, Council of the European Union

(Case C-14/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) - Member of SatCen’s contract staff - Complaints of psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - Request for assistance - Suspension of the staff member - Disciplinary proceedings - Removal of the staff member - SatCen’s Appeals Board - Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes - Action for annulment - First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU - Action for damages - Article 268 TFEU - Jurisdiction of the EU judicature - Admissibility - Acts open to challenge - Contractual nature of the dispute - Articles 272 and 274 TFEU - Effective judicial protection - Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU - First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU - Principle of equal treatment - General Court’s obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the facts and evidence - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration)

(2020/C 279/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Union Satellite Centre (represented by: A. Guillerme, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: KF (represented by: N. Macaulay, Barrister, and A. Kunst, Rechtsanwältin), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by KF; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by KF;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 30, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Open Grid Alliance, Inc. (“OGA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Quintecon, Inc., Mountain View, CA, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, Crown Castle Fiber LLC, Houston, TX; and DartPoints Operating Company LLC, Greenville, SC, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OGA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 31, 2022, OGA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 2022 (87 FR 29180).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 16, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 23, 2023 (88 FR 57478).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27591 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 668 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 668

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that philanthropy 
 is an integral partner to government with a unique and proven ability 
  to foster innovation, strengthen civil society, and build thriving 
                              communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2016

    Mr. Tiberi (for himself and Mr. Lewis) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that philanthropy 
 is an integral partner to government with a unique and proven ability 
  to foster innovation, strengthen civil society, and build thriving 
                              communities.

Whereas philanthropy embodies a longstanding United States value of charitable 
        giving and empowers donors from all walks of life to use a variety of 
        giving tools to serve their communities both today and tomorrow;
Whereas charitable giving is driven by United States generosity but also reliant 
        upon the enabling environment fostered by incentives in the tax code;
Whereas foundations spur innovation and drive progress in our communities in 
        education, healthcare, the arts, economic and rural development, and 
        countless other social issues;
Whereas foundations, while not a replacement for government services, leverage 
        private resources and provide vital risk capital and expertise to 
        respond to immediate needs like natural disasters, and build resources 
        over time to address long-term issues like education and job creation;
Whereas philanthropy enriches the Nation's civil society through a deep 
        connection to the needs of communities, and as such, is an essential 
        partner in policymaking; and
Whereas the Nation benefits from collaboration between government and the 
        philanthropic sector, and together, we can work to solve pressing social 
        problems, better serve our common constituents, and produce thriving 
        United States communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
philanthropy is a dynamic force for innovation, strategic thinking, and 
leadership that advances the common good.
                                 <all>
```
Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 125

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

No. CV-22-515

ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS 

AND BLUE SHIELD

APPELLANT

V.

FREEWAY SURGERY CENTER; SCOTT 

SCHLESINGER, M.D.; FAIR PARK 

SURGERY CENTER; CENTERVIEW 

SURGERY CENTER; SOUTH 

ARKANSAS SURGERY CENTER;

ADVANCED AMBULATORY SURGERY 

CENTER; EXECUTIVE PARK 

SURGERY CENTER OF FORT SMITH; 

GASTROENTEROLOGY AND 

SURGERY CENTER OF ARKANSAS;

MOUNTAIN HOME SURGERY 

CENTER; HARRISON SURGERY 

CENTER; BOZMAN-HOF EYE 

CENTER; PHYSICIANS DAY A/K/A 

MCFARLAND EYE CENTER; SPRING 

CREEK SURGERY CENTER; TAYLOR 

PLASTIC SURGERY; SURGERY 

CENTER OF NORTHEAST TEXAS;

ADVANCED INTERVENTIONAL PAIN 

MANAGEMENT; PRECISION 

SURGICAL OF NORTHWEST 

ARKANSAS; EXECUTIVE SURGERY 

CENTER OF LITTLE ROCK; CENTRAL 

ARKANSAS SURGERY CENTER A/K/A 

ARKANSAS SPINE AND PAIN; AND 

ARKANSAS CENTER FOR SURGICAL 

EXCELLENCE

APPELLEES

AND

ALAN MCCLAIN, ARKANSAS

INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

INTERESTED PARTY

Opinion Delivered March 1, 2023

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI 

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH 

DIVISION

[NO. 60CV-21-2725]

HONORABLE WENDELL GRIFFEN, 

JUDGE

MONETARY SANCTION PURGED
2

PER CURIAM

In a recent opinion, this court accepted court reporter Neva Warford’s plea that she 

engaged in contumacious behavior before this court. See Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield 

v. Freeway Surgery Center, 2023 Ark. App. 91. Having accepted her guilty plea, we issued 

sanctions. One was a $3,000 monetary sanction against Ms. Warford. Id. We stated, 

however, that it would be purged upon the completion of certain conditions. Id. Based on 

the information now filed of record, we hold that Ms. Warford has met the conditions

needed to purge the $3,000 sanction that we conditionally imposed on 15 February 2023. 

Consequently, the monetary sanction is hereby purged, and Ms. Warford has no obligation 

to pay any sum in this case.

GRUBER, J., not participating.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoPrograms & Ceremonies
Capitol Flag Program
The program began in 1937 when a Member of Congress requested a flag that had flown over the U.S. Capitol.
        
                  Over the years the focus of the program gradually expanded to encompass the commemoration of national holidays and various special events, as well as to honor the work of groups such as schools and civic organizations. Requests for Capitol flags rapidly outgrew the supply; hence, the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) instituted a program of flying smaller flags that may be purchased through members' offices.

The AOC fulfills all flag requests from members of the United States Senate and the House of Representatives. Flags are flown daily year-round, weather permitting, excluding Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day.

Currently, the AOC fulfills on average more than 100,000 flag requests from Members of Congress annually, with the number of requests and the popularity of the Capitol Flag Program growing steadily each year. There are special flag poles where all flags are flown. After it is flown over the U.S. Capitol, each flag is issued a keepsake Certificate of Authenticity by the AOC.

Frequently Asked Questions About Flag Law**Please contact your representative or senator to obtain a flag flown over the Capitol.**

Person with hand on boxes.

An AOC employee in the U.S. Capitol's flag office.

AOC employees in the U.S. Capitol flag office.


Resources for Congressional Staff

The following resources are for congressional staff use only:

Flag Flying Guidelines (Updated 2019)
	Flag Request Form (Fillable PDF)
	Fallen Heroes Flag Request Form (Capitol Network Only)
          
    
    
      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
16643

#### Castro v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co.

March 25, 1997

Order No. 97-25

Affirmed
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Lamora, Appellant.

(No. 32027

Decided February 1, 1950.)

*Mr. Carson Roy,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Robert N. Ziegler,*for appellee.

*Mr. Jerome Goldman,*for appellant.

It is hereby ordered and decreed that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Turner, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6857

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS A. WILKINSON, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD M. CONK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-68)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998
2

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Thomas Zerkin, GERALD T. ZERKIN & ASSOCIATES, Richmond,

Virginia; Paula Marie Junghans, MARTIN, JUNGHANS, SNYDER &

BERNSTEIN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. David T.

Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court’s order denying

their supplemental motion for a new trial based on their allegations of newly discovered evidence and the Government’s violation

of the disclosure requirements of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83

(1963). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilkinson, No.

CR-95-68 (E.D. Va. June 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50277 

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM P. ORRELL, II,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-93-CR-31; P-94-CA-30

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William P. Orrell, II, pleaded guilty to one count of wire

fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and was sentenced to 24 months

imprisonment, three years supervised release, a $2,500 fine, and

a $50 special assessment. He filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 alleging, inter alia, that that he was denied effective

assistance of counsel. The district court denied relief and

dismissed the motion.

 Orrell admitted his guilt at the guilty plea hearing and at

the sentencing hearing. In exchange for his guilty plea to the

one-count information, the Government dismissed a six-count
No. 95-50277

-2-

indictment. Orrell has not demonstrated that in the absence of

his attorney's alleged errors, he would have insisted on going to

trial. See United States v. Smith, 844 F.2d 203, 209 (5th Cir.

1988); Czere v. Butler, 833 F.2d 59, 64 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Orrell also argues that his attorney was ineffective because

he took $500 from his parents prior to Barclay being appointed as

his attorney. Even assuming Orrell's allegations are true, he

cannot demonstrate how this action rendered his attorney's

assistance ineffective. 

For the first time on appeal Orrell argues that his attorney

was ineffective for failing to investigate the case adequately. 

This court need not address issues not considered by the district

court. "[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal are not

reviewable by this court unless they involve purely legal

questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest

injustice." Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir.

1991).

This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because

the appeal is frivolous, it will be dismissed. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

We caution Orrell that any additional frivolous appeals filed by

him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Orrell is further cautioned to review all

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that

are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

Appeal DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

1.3 EXHIBIT 32.1 - CEO 906 CERTIFICATION

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel J. Kocher, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date:  December 27, 2004.

                                    /s/ Joel J. Kocher
                                    -------------------------
                                    Joel J. Kocher
                                    Chairman of the Board, President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer