alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ja,sEOsrq,,,. 

## a ~ d r ` ~,o '9L ' . S~ 

## UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY REGION 7 901 NORTH 5THSTREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

# 11 JUL 2009 Mr. Mike Linder Director Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality P.O . Box 98922 Lincoln, NE 68509-8922 Dear Mr. Linder: On May 27, 2009, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 7 received your request to amend the Nebraska State Implementation Plan to include revisions to Title 129 - Nebraska Air Quality Regulations, which revised the definition ofvolatile organic compounds; clarified language related to construction permits and incorporated rules on application fees; and clarified language related to open fires to explicitly include an exemption for fires used for religious activities. We have determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete. This determination does not mean that we have made anyjudgment as to the approvability ofthe submittal . We are reviewing it against applicable Environmental Protection Agency criteria so that we can take fonnal action on this submittal . Final action will be taken after publication of notice in the Federal Register and an opportunity for public comment. The principal contact for this rulemaking is Chrissy Wolfersberger. If you have any questions, please contact her at (913) 551-7864. Sincerely, ecky Weber Director Air and Waste Management Division

RECYCLED 

## aso%FIBER
IN I T I A L REV I EW E NG I N EER I NG REPORT PMN : 14 - 0 2 6 8 Focus Ready Draft 2/10/2014 E NG I N EER : Prothero \ A F D

TLV/PEL: none establ i shed . 

# -Con s u mer Use : No SAT (conce r ns) (0 1 /3 1 /20 1 4) : R

e l ated Cases a n d M i se SAT I n f o : Ana l ogs : M

i gra ti P dt modera t e - r ap i d PBT rat i ng : P 1 B 1 T 1 H

ea l t h : 2 Dermal , I n h a l ation E co : 1 Water (Al l relea s es to wate r w i t h a CC 1 00 0 ppb)OCCUPATI ONAL EXPOSURE RATING : l A NO T ES & K E Y

PO LLUT I ON PREVE N TI ON CONSIDERAT I ONS : None . EXPOSURE - BASED REVI EW : NoIN I T I A L REV I EW ENG I N EER I NG REPORT PMN : 14 - 0268 USE : Numbe r o f S i tes/ Locat i on : 1 BYK USA I nc . Wal li ngford CT 06492 Days/yr : 28

ENV I R ONMENTAL R EL EAS E S EST I MAT E SUMMARY 

# ....

A

i r - neg l ig i b l e ( l ow VP, li quid) ; Inc in eration<< 28 , 000 r e
Wate r or I n c i ne r at i o n or Landfi ll Hi gh End : 3 . 2E+l kg/s i te - day over 28 days/yr from 1 s i t e

RE LEASE TOTAL 9 . 0E+2 kg/yr - a ll sites OCCU PATI ONAL EXPOSURE S EST I MATE SUMMARY

# -
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1373-E1374]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        CELEBRATING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF BOY SCOUT TROOP 508

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. KENNY MARCHANT

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. MARCHANT. Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride that I celebrate 
the 50th anniversary of Boy Scout Troop 508 of Irving, Texas. The troop 
has a remarkable history of serving the community and developing young 
men into leaders.
  Troop 508 was originally chartered at Woodhaven Presbyterian Church 
in 1962. The troop has a reputation for frequent traveling and extended 
outdoor adventures. Much of the boys' solidarity has revolved around 
their travels together, starting with ``The Green Weeny'' bus in 1966. 
During its history, the troop has traveled to exciting natural 
locations such as the Grand Canyon, Colorado, Brazos River, and to the 
center of civic leadership--right here in Washington, D.C. Indeed, in a 
troop where ``three-fourths of scouting is outing'' it is only fitting 
that the group have adopted the roadrunner as its traditional logo.
  Boy Scout Troop 508 also has a history of exceptional adult 
leadership, both in its scoutmasters and former members. The adult 
leaders have been trained in Woodbadge and eight of the last twelve 
Silver Beavers were members of the 508. Many of them serve on the staff 
of ALTs, Webelorees, Camporees, and the District Committee for Five 
Trails. The troop has won first-place several times at Camporees and at 
Winter Camp. Throughout its 50 years, the distinguished troop has been 
guided by the leadership of scoutmasters including Mitch Barker, 
Sterling Bradley, David White, Blackie Marks, Norman Rozell, Jack 
Graham, George Gray, Bob Hootman, ``Indian George'' Alford, Dwight 
Sensabough, Jim Bell, Herb Boyd, Hamilton, Jerry Wicker, Scott Pohl, 
Roger Knapp, Bob Harris, Randall Svajda, Carter Hallmark, Richard 
Gamble, Roland Jeter, Dean Calvert, Bob Perkins, and Wayne Fletcher. 
``Indian George'' Alford was an especially noteworthy man, a selfless 
and kind Comanche who founded Troop and Post 134 in Dallas and moved on 
to make a lasting legacy with Troop 508 in Irving, particularly with 
his Indian dance teams.

[[Page E1374]]

  Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the 24th Congressional District of Texas, I 
ask all my distinguished colleagues to join me in congratulating Boy 
Scout Troop 508 on 50 years of inspiring young men to do their best in 
all that they do, while enjoying competition with good sportsmanship.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2009153EN.01001401.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-253/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/22/EC - Approximation of laws - Social legislation relating to road transport activities - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2009/C 153/26

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell and M. Teles Romão, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes and F. Fraústo de Azevedo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 35)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | declares that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2006/22; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2006/22;

| 2. | orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00117

- CR

JOSEPH LEO STREHL, III, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. CR15

- 075

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Our review of the court reporter’s record in this case indicates that volume five contai ns “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10 (a)(1). Volume five of the reporter’s r ecord includes social security numbers. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(f

) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(f). Therefore, because the court reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Cour t or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(f), to seal volume five of the electronically filed reporter’s record in
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: December 15, 2015
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.96-50241

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADRIAN J. CROOK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-95-CR-54 (2)

October 11, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Adrian J. Crook has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolousissue. Accordingly, appointed counsel is dismissed from further responsibilities

herein and the appeal is DISMISSED.
2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby
certifies that the Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Report), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 27, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    STEPHEN J. J. LETWIN                                         
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Stephen J. J. Letwin Managing
Director (Principal Executive Officer)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 2

- 0994

_____________________________
D AVID H OWARD ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

January 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 David Howard
, pro se, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 13, 2011

Order 

October 13, 2011

143720 (54)

GORDON SCOTT DITTMER, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

SC: 143720

v COA: 298997

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CT of CLAIMS: 09-000126 MP

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

DIRECTOR, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY WARDEN, ST. LOUIS

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DEPUTY

WARDEN and ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY CORRECTIONS OFFICER, 

Respondents-Appellees.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for reconsideration of the order of 

September 14, 2011 is considered and it is denied because it does not appear the order 

was entered erroneously.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1323-E1324]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               ELEANOR LOGAN, LONDON 2012 OLYMPIC ATHLETE

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. CHELLIE PINGREE

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

  Ms. PINGREE of Maine. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to highlight the 
outstanding accomplishments of a young woman from Maine's First 
District.
  Eleanor Logan has been rowing since 2003. She has shown true 
dedication to the sport in her training and competition, and has won 
numerous awards for her rowing, both nationally and internationally. 
After winning gold in the 8-person shell at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, 
she set her sights on completing her undergraduate degree from Stanford 
University while also training for the 2012 U.S. Olympic Team. And now, 
within weeks, she will be representing our nation in the London 
Olympics.
  I'm very proud to highlight Eleanor's success. She is a shining 
example of what can be accomplished with opportunity and commitment. 
Successfully balancing education and training, she has worked 
tremendously hard to achieve her Olympic dreams.
  As Eleanor continues on her journey as an athlete and a leader, she 
is enabling Maine to shine on the international stage, as well.
  Go Team USA!

[[Page E1324]]

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32
   Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002 United
    States Code
  Form 10-K Form 10-K), Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 Form 10-K
  Date: February 25, 2011

By:       /s/ WILLIAM J.
    DOYLEWilliam
    J. DoylePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 25, 2011

By:       /s/ WAYNE R.
    BROWNLEEWayne
    R. BrownleeExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and
    Chief Financial Officer   Form 10-K Regulation S-K, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 United States Code Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT 32

    Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer
           and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aura Systems, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 4, 2005                           /s/ Dennis Calvert
                                               ------------------

                                               Dennis Calvert
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 4, 2005                           /s/ Dennis Calvert
                                               ------------------

                                               Dennis Calvert
                                               Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### Eli WATKINS, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12678.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 4, 1959.

Ross & Ross, by Clyde F. Ross, Olcemah, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Eli Watkins, defendant below, was charged by information in the District Court of Okfuskee County, Oklahoma, with the crime of arson in the second degree. He was tried to a jury, convicted as charged, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of one year. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal by transcript is taken.

In his petition in error defendant alleges the information is void for uncertainty, error of the court in giving instructions four and eight and error of the court in refusing to grant a continuance of the hearing of the motion for new trial.

This matter was filed in this Court on October 17, 19S8. After due and proper notice to the defendant the cause was set for oral argument on the docket of January 28, 1959. No appearance was made on behalf of defendant, no briefs have been filed, and no application for extension of time so *651to do has been received. The rule is axiomatic :

> “Under the rules of this court, where no briefs are filed nor appearance for oral argument is made, the record will be searched for fundamental error only, and if none is found, the judgment will he affirmed.” Younger v. State, 95 Okl.Cr. 189, 242 P.2d 470.

We have examined the information and find it states with particularity the crime charged; the instructions of the court and find them to be entirely adequate; and the judgment and sentence and find no fundamental error therein. The judgment and sentence is accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmine Buccola, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err in permitting the jurors to take notes. Defendant, citing *People v DiLuca*(85 AD2d 439), argues that the court erred in failing to give the jury precautionary instructions concerning the taking of notes. By not requesting such instructions, however, defendant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review.

Also unpreserved for review is defendant’s. argument that the court erred in refusing to read back to the jury the summations of counsel.

We find no error in the court’s handling of the jurors’ request to read back testimony of the prosecution witnesses.

The court properly exercised its discretion in ruling on the *Sandoval*motion. The court precluded the use of defendant’s weapons conviction, which would have been highly prejudicial to defendant in his prosecution involving the shooting death of the victim. At the same time, the court properly allowed the use of the burglary convictions, which did not involve acts similar to the instant offense.

The court’s charge on intent did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof *(see, People v Green,*50 NY2d 891, 893, *cert denied*449 US 957; *People v Getch,*50 NY2d 456).

We have reviewed the issues raised in defendant’s *pro se*supplemental brief and we find them lacking in merit. (Appeal *602from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### James Ingram EWING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-74-393.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 22, 1974.

Don Anderson, Public Defender, Oklahoma County, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

Appellant, James Ingram Ewing, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in Case No. CRF-73-2626, in the District Court, Oklahoma County, of the crime of Burglary in the Second Degree in violation of 21 O.S. 1971, § 1435. He was sentenced to serve a term of four (4) years in the State penitentiary. A timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

Briefly stated, the evidence presented by the State of Oklahoma at defendant’s trial *1244was this: At approximately 12 o’clock on the night of September 20, 1973, Officers Lane and Cain of the Oklahoma City Police Department, received a call reporting a burglary in process at the Alamo Plaza Restaurant. As a result of that call, they apprehended the defendant and one Ray Ditto, Jr., inside the restaurant. A louvered vent in the rear of the building had been forced open. The police found tire tools, a screw driver and a brown cloth glove in the area where the defendant and Ditto were apprehended. The manager of the restaurant was called to the scene and identified the defendant, James Ingram Ewing, as a former employee of the restaurant. Subsequently, the defendant, having been fully advised of his rights, told the arresting officers that he had broken into the building with the intent of taking money inside. Ray Ditto testified for the State that he and the defendant pried open the air vent and entered the restaurant together with the intention of obtaining money. No evidence was offered in the defendant’s behalf.

This appeal raises first the question of whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, the function of the Court of Criminal Appeals is limited to ascertaining whether there is a basis in the evidence on which the jury could reasonably and properly conclude that the accused is guilty as charged. Fields v. State, Okl.Cr., 322 P.2d 431 (1958). We are of the opinion that the evidence of the defendant’s guilt in the instant case is overwhelming.

The second question raised by the instant appeal is whether the punishment imposed was excessive. As we have so often said, the question of excessiveness of punishment must be determined by a study of all the facts and circumstances in the individual case, and the Court of Criminal Appeals has no power to modify a sentence unless we can conscientiously say that under all the facts and circumstances the sentence is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the Court. The sentence here imposed does not exceed that provided by statute and, under the circumstances of this case, we are unable to say that it is so excessive as to shock the conscience of this Court. For the above and foregoing reasons it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence appealed from should be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

BLISS, P. J., and BUSSEY, J, concur.