alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,984,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              391,215,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   664,000
<INVENTORY>                                342,060,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           743,595,000
<PP&E>                                      28,506,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,042,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             758,059,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      340,698,000
<BONDS>                                    281,240,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 67,429,000
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  68,661,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               758,059,000
<SALES>                                    (59,848,000)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (59,848,000)
<CGS>                                       30,879,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,879,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           140,976,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,759,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (263,462,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (29,582,000)<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (233,880,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (7.55)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (7.55)
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, INCOME TAX READS "INCOME TAX/(BENEFIT)"
<F2>FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
994 P.2d 561

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

September 29, 1998

20922

#### State v. Oclit

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 33-80081, 333-33130, 333-47388, 333-70620 and 333-98135) of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2004,except for Note 11, which is as of March 8, 2004, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

March 15, 2004

----
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Encorium Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip L. Calamia, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Philip L. CalamiaPhilip L. CalamiaInterim Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)





April 30, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
*******EXHIBIT 3.2*******

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE 

AMENDED ANDRESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 

OF 

E COM VENTURES, INC. 

a Florida corporation 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.1006 of the Florida Business Corporation Act, the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the “Corporation”) are hereby amendedas follows: 

1. The first paragraph of Article III of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended to provide thefollowing: 

The aggregate number of shares of all classes of capital stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is twenty-onemillion (21,000,000) shares, consisting of (i) twenty million (20,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), and (ii) one million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, parvalue $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). 

Except as hereby amended, the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation ofthe Corporation shall remain the same. 

2. The foregoing amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporationwas recommended by the Board of Directors of the Corporation and submitted to the shareholders of the Corporation for approval at the special meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation, held on August 8, 2008. The amendment to the Amendedand Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation was approved by the shareholders of the Corporation, with the number of votes cast for the amendment being sufficient for approval in accordance with the applicable provisions of the FloridaBusiness Corporation Act. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized officer of the Corporation has executed these Articles ofAmendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as of this 8th day of August, 2008.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         233,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,571,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                   705,466
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,601,223
<PP&E>                                      24,969,107
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,306,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,409,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,631,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       908,906
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,498,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,409,123
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,949,611
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,713,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               336,975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,361,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,535,274)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (400,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,135,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,135,274)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       [LETTERHEAD OF STEGMAN & COMPANY]

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 18, 2006,
relating to the 2005 consolidated financial statements of Tri-County Financial
Corporation, by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-97174, 333-79237,
333-708000, and 333-125103, each of Form S-8, and in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Tri-County Financial Corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                                           /s/ Stegman & Company
Baltimore, Maryland
March 28, 2006
December 23, 1999

22095

#### Mason v. Kang

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 945 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 945

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 6, 2016.
    Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the House of 
Representatives for the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress be printed as a House 
document, and that three thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound 
for the use of the House of Representatives, of which nine hundred eighty copies 
shall be bound in leather with thumb index and delivered as may be directed by 
the Parliamentarian of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# Bi Lee

®~. 

# ric 

# k 

# _r.

I M i■

~~ 

### ii SO40a j F(C

"~ M Frank G. Peny, Sr. Don Perry Frank G. Perry, Jr. J. R. Holton Chafrman of fhs 8oard Presfdent V' ,ce President Secretary / Treasurer 

### Phil Liles Mike Liily Tretta McNeili V/r.e Pr+esldent Vice President Assistant Secr+etary Sales & iNarketing Manufacturing / Treasurer


### Apri112, 2013 A1ex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency David Rostker, U.S. Sni.all Business Administration, Office of Advocacy Courtney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: I am writing today as the owner and president of a small brick manufacturing company 

### that has the potential to be significantly impacted by the upcoming MACT standard for major sources in the: brick and structural clay processing indushy. We are not a formal 

## Smal1 Entity Representative (SER) in the cuxrent review panel being conducted under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). However, all of our industry is working,together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are keeping us apprised of the activities on this rule. We consider them to be spealdng on all. industry's behalf as they work with you.
Since

Y 

# ~

3704 Hawkins Ave. • P. 0. Box 1027 • Sanford, N.C. 27330 • Bus.: 919-774-4800 9 Fax.: 919-774-7557 • Toll Free: 800-572-7559
#### Frank A. Buono, Respondent, v Makita U.S.A., Inc., et al., Appellants.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated June 26, 1989, as provided that their separate motions to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR *1973012 (b) were granted unless the plaintiff served a complaint within 10 days of the date of the order.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the defendants’ motions to dismiss the action are granted unconditionally.

Since the plaintiff did not oppose or even appear on the motions to dismiss his action for failure to serve a complaint pursuant to the defendants’ demands (see, CPLR 3012 [b]), he neither provided an excuse for his delay nor addressed the merits of his case. It was thus error as a matter of law to grant the motions conditionally *(see, Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells,*64 NY2d 904; *Stolowitz v Mount Sinai Hosp.,*60 NY2d 685; *Jones v TSS Seedman’s Inc.,*131 AD2d 728). Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5381]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS

  The following concurrent resolutions and Senate resolutions were 
read, and referred (or acted upon), as indicated:

           By Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. Cornyn):
       S. Con. Res. 54. A concurrent resolution stating that it is 
     the policy of the United States to oppose the sale, shipment, 
     performance of maintenance, refurbishment, modification, 
     repair, and upgrade of any military equipment from or by the 
     Russian Federation to or for the Syrian Arab Republic; to the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations.

                          ____________________
```
!	
 
"
" # $%&	 ' (

) *+,-./0.1 .2 345+6+5 345+6+578 9 :55

$<KL=M(NO>PQKRS?T
$@@; >?
$@@?ABCBB; DE+15FG.1H1IJII UMRRVLSWMXSQP

YKLXMWQLSKLMNOPQKRSTZ[TSVN ZVTTKMR\KPPV]OKXVKR^_NKR`SVT ab`cQR^defgh^gijkZa^i^j

lVOMXSmKPSVXnoOSKMRTpk]KSqMmVQXYMr`PV

stuvwsxywz{x|}~yyz~u}~{v~vz~|

uuv}~~z~|z|v~

v}|wz

zuv~|zy|z|}}u}|

zxywv}~~~{

zxyvv~|v~v

|zuvw|vv~v 

u

¡¢ ¡£ ¡¤  ¡  

q`N¥VXM¦UMNOPQKRSTmKPVr di hi jh jj j§ ^§

q`N¥VXM¦UMNOPQKRQRST fj j§ jh jj j ̈ ^§

lVOVQSmKPVXT feii^ i zxywv}~{©v

zxyvv~|v~v

|zuvw|vv~v 

u

  a«¬­® ̄«°±23 ́μ¬¶·3μ ̧­1 ́2­o322­» ́μ»°1⁄42¬ ́±2­ ̧3¶­¶1⁄2

3⁄4¿­¶1⁄4°«1¬¿­ ̧3¶­¶°3Àμ«¬­Á1⁄432¬«¬32·«°±23 ́μ¬¶1 ́2­o1⁄2 ¡¢ ¡£ ¡¤  ¡

lQLV e ̈ eh ej eh ^^ f UMPMX d h ^ _ej ^ lVPKÂKMR ^hiif h lVOXKTQP je ^h ^i e_ ^i eh

ZV] e_ e§ ee eh ed _ WÃÄ eiiii i qQSKMRQPoXKÂKR §jhh§ e kÅ`QPWQ[ÄLS iei^e i ÄÂV ^e e^ ee ei ̈ f ÃKTQ¥KPKS[ e_ ^i e ̈ eh eh e_

ÆVRVSKLT iieei i qMRÇkko h^^ff f zxywv}~{u| zxyvv~|v~v

|zuvw|vv~v 

u

  a«¬­® ̄«°±23 ́μ¬¶·3μ ̧­1 ́2­o322­» ́μ»°1⁄42¬ ́±2­ ̧3¶­¶1⁄2

3⁄4¿­¶1⁄4°«1¬¿­ ̧3¶­¶°3Àμ«¬­Á1⁄432¬«¬32·«°±23 ́μ¬¶1 ́2­o1⁄2 ¡¢ ¡£ ¡¤  ¡

ÄOOMKRSNVRSnÈKXV ei^^e i ÄTTKÂRNVRSM¦Ã`SKVT  ̈dj^i i Ä\QXrT iieii i U K SmPPaK nW ZSS iiiii i

OQÂV

LMXRVX

UMRSVRSÉMr[qQÊKÂQSKMRËKRÌT

 	   !	
 Í Î Ï ÐÑÐ Ï Ò
# **Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in connection with theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 thatis being filed concurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of ClaytonWilliams Energy, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Clayton W. Williams |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Clayton W. Williams     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 8, 2005     |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Mel G. Riggs        |
|   | Mel G. Riggs            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 8, 2005     |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Kevin Cambridge, Respondent.

— Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), dated September 25, 1989, as granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of a two-count indictment charging the defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, on the ground that the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of the indictment is denied, the first count of the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the indictment *(see, People v Timmons,*127 AD2d 806; *see also, People v Blue,*173 AD2d 836). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.
**~00=1** __ _ 06 / 09 2013 12 : 00 FAX 2108947132 D1

Athens, 

# b September 2013 HELLENIC REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE Ref No: CAA/D1/B / :)

## CJ,( TRANSPORT AND NE1WORKS CNIL AVIATION AUTHORITY DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF AIR TRANSPORT AIR TRANSPORT AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS DIVISION BILATERAL AIR AGREEMENTS SECTION

Dear Sir, ·ro: M. Paul GRETCH Director of Office of lnternational Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street S.W. Washington DC 20590 U

.S.A.

Further to the rights provided in the Air Transport Agreement signed in Washington, on 30 April 2007, between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America and the rights provided in the Air Transport Agreement signed on 31**t** July 1.991 , between the Government of Hellenic Republic and the Government of the United States, extended until July 31, 2007, the Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority herewith confirms that it will grant, on the basis of reciprocit y, rights to the U.S

. air carriers to provide non scheduled flights to/from the Greek territory.

HCAA

- PO Box 70360-166 01 Glyfada -Athens -GREECE , Tel. +30 210 8916121-149, FAX +-310210 8947132, e-mail: d1b@hcaa.gr
DLD

- 277 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 4

- 2108

___________ IN RE: ARTHUR D’AMARIO III, Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the Unit ed States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Crim. No. 06

- cr - 00112

- 001 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

June 12, 2014 Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN and NYGAARD , Circuit Judges

(Opi nion filed : June 19, 2014 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Arthur D’Amario III has filed a pe tition for a writ of mandamus, asking for the following relief: (1) “For the forced recusal of Judge Paul S. Diamond from U.S. v. D’Amario , No. CR 6

- 112

- PSD (D/NJ), due to bias, judicial fraud and criminality”; (2) “For the release of Petitioner from a false imprisonment”; and (3) “That this Court place Judge Diamond under arrest and subject him to a comprehensive inpatient mental evaluation.” Because D’Amari o’s requests are either frivolous or not properly brought in a petition for a writ of mandamus, we will deny the petition.2

As to his f

irst request , w hile mandamus is available to review a district court’s refusal to recuse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), see Alexander v. Primerica Holdings,
Inc. , 10 F.3d 155, 163 (3d Cir. 1993), D’Amario’s request is baseless. We see nothing in the record that would give us reason to question the District Court’s impartiality. As to
his s econd, mandamus is not a proper m eans for seeking release from imprisonment, as
mandamus cannot serve as a substitute for an appeal. See Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 77 (3d Cir. 1996). Indeed, D’Amario’s appeal from the revocation of his supervised
release is currently pending. See C. A. No. 13

- 3515. Finally, D’Amario’s third request, which is in any event frivolous, is not properly brought in a petition for a writ of
mandamus. See In re McBryde , 117 F.3d 208, 220 n.7 (5th Cir. 1997). 1 For the foregoing reasons, we will deny the peti tion for a writ of mandamus.

1 In his supplement, D’Amario states that previous failures to release him to his mother as part of his supervised release “warrant[] a full criminal investigation by the Circuit.” Courts of appeals do not undertake criminal investigations. While a district court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to issue a writ “ to compel an officer or em ployee of the United States . . . to perfor m a duty owed to the plaintiff,” the writ may issue only for

“ a clear nondiscretionary dut y. ” Heckler v. Ringer , 466 U.S. 602, 616 (1984) . Initiation of a criminal investigation is a discretionary act and thus not the proper subject of a mandamus request. See, e.g. , Jafree v. Barber , 689 F.2d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 1982).
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141757) and Amendment No. 385 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 27, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 934 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>

<DOC>
H. Res. 934

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 30, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 34) to authorize and strengthen the 
tsunami detection, forecast, warning, research, and mitigation program of the 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and for other purposes, with 
the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention 
of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment with 
an amendment consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114-67 modified by 
the amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 80 minutes, with 60 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and 20 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its 
adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (H.R. 6392) to amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act to specify when bank holding companies may be subject to 
certain enhanced supervision, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Financial Services; (2) the amendment printed in part 
B of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
offered by the Member designated in the report, which shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, shall be 
separately debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for a division of the question; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Darcy v. Lolohea

16781

12/19/94

Denied

77 Hawai'i 422, 886 P.2d 759