alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021481EN.01000501.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021 — Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL (C-53/19 P), Kingdom of Spain (C-65/19 P) v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland

(Joined Cases C-53/19 P and C-65/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Tax system - Corporate tax provisions allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies which are tax resident outside that Member State - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Condition relating to selectivity - Reference system - Derogation - Difference in treatment - Justification for the difference in treatment)

(2021/C 481/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellants: Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, abogados) (C-53/19 P), Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by A. Rubio González and A. Sampol Pucurull, and subsequently by S. Centeno Huerta and S. Jiménez García, Agents) (C-65/19 P)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, Agents), Ireland

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.

---
VS Bulletin 2019.1 

1

United States

Department of

Agriculture

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Riverdale, MD

20737

Commerical Private Bird Import Quarantines – Minimum Frequency of Visits

1. Purpose and Background

This document ensures that Veterinary Services’ staff provides consistent 

oversight of privately owned or operated commercial bird import 

quarantines. This document describes the minimum frequency of VS visits 

to the facility for intake, release, sampling, health inspections, oversight of 

operations and security/biosecurity, and other actions required by title 9, 

Code of Federal Regulations (9 CFR) part 93. 

2. Document Status

A. Review date: 09/06/2022.

B. This document replaces Veterinary Services Bulletin 2015.4, which is 

cancelled.

3. Reason for Reissuance 

VS is reissuing this bulletin to accommodate updates in its current structure and 

practice.

4. Authority and References

A. Authorities (Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and U.S. Code (U.S.C.)):

• 7 CFR 371.4

• 9 CFR part 93

B. References

VSG 13410.1, Disease Testing and Sampling Requirements for Imported 

Live Poultry and Birds (and Hatching Eggs of Poultry, Birds, and Ratites) 

during Entry Quarantines

5. Audience

VS employees, other affected Federal and State agencies, and affected 

members of the public.

6. Body 

A. A VS veterinary medical officer (VMO) must visit the quarantine daily from Day 1 

(or the date of arrival, whichever is later) through Day 16 of the minimum 30-day 

quarantine period to oversee operations, account for daily deaths, and collect 

samples as set forth in VSG 13410.1.
B. At a minimum, the VMO must visit the quarantine every other day between days 

17 and the date of release to oversee operations, review security and biosecurity,

and inspect the birds.

C. VS must visit the facility to release the birds from quarantine.

D. At the discretion of the VMO or at the request of the importer, VS personnel may 

visit more frequently to ensure animal health and safety.

E. VS personnel must place seals on the entrances to private commercial bird 

import quarantines when no facility or VS personnel are inside. Access to any 

sealed facility is available only when VS personnel are present to break seals.

F. User fees apply during each VS visit.

7. Inquiries

For questions, please contact the Strategy and Policy Live Animal Imports Staff 

at 301-851-3300.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Lapis  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Miron Markovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


March 28, 2005                      /s/ Miron Markovitz
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Miron Markovitz
                                    Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008064EN.01004402.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/44

---

Action brought on 21 December 2007 — Insight Direct USA v OHIM — Net Insight (Insight)

(Case T-489/07)

(2008/C 64/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Insight Direct USA, Inc. (Tempe, United States) (represented by: M. Gilbert and M. Moore, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Net Insight AB (Stockholm, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 20 September 2007 in Case R 1428/2006-2 shall be annulled and the rejection of the application for all services in classes 37 and 42 and the rejected services in class 35 be overturned and the application be allowed to proceed in respect of all of the services for which the application was published. |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal dated 20 September 2007 in Case R 1428/2006-2 shall be annulled and the rejection of the application for all services in classes 37 and 42 and the rejected services in class 35 be overturned and the application be allowed to proceed in respect of all of the services for which the application was published.

| — | The Office and other parties shall bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Office and other parties shall bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Insight’ for services in classes 35, 36, 37 and 42 — application No 3 309 002

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Net Insight AB

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community and national word mark ‘NET INSIGHT’ for goods and services in classes 9, 37 and 41

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition partially upheld and partially rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: According to the applicant, the Board of Appeal wrongly identified the dominant and distinctive elements of the earlier mark and did not give consideration to all the relevant factors in assessing the similarity of the relevant goods and services. Furthermore, the Board of Appeal failed to consider all the relevant factors in relation to the global appreciation test when determining the likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks.

Pleas in law:

---
MODELO: DECLARAÇÃO DE REBANHOS OVINOS E CAPRINOS 

DO PROPRIETÁRIO/ TRANSPORTADOR 

Example: Owner/Hauler Statement for Sheep and Goats

NOME E ENDEREÇO DO PROPRIETÁRIO

Owner Name and Address

NOME E ENDEREÇO DE DESTINO

Destination Name and Address

Nome:

Name

Nome:

Name

Endereço:

Address

Endereço:

Address

Cidade/Estado/CEP:

City/State/Zip

Cidade/Estado/CEP:

City/State/Zip

Telefone:

Phone

Telefone:

Phone

NOME E ENDEREÇO DO TRANSPORTADOR

Hauler Name and Address

Data de deslocação dos animais:

Date Animals Moved

Nome:

Name

Endereço:

Address

Identificação ou código PIN do rebanho com 

paraplexia enzoótica ou scrapie*:

*Número de identificação do local

*Perseel-ID-nommer

Scrapie Flock ID or PIN

Cidade/Estado/CEP:

City/State/Zip

Telefone:

Phone

INFORMAÇÕES SOBRE OS ANIMAIS

Número de 

Animais

Number of 

animals

Ovina ou

caprina

Sheep or Goats

Raça (Breed)

(Se for rebanho de raça desconhecida, por 

favor, indique a cor da face dos ovinos e 

especifique o tipo das caprinos: leite, 

carne, fibra).

Classificação (Class)

(Selecione e separe fêmeas ovinos/caprinos, machos 

ovinos/caprinos, ovinos/caprinos jovens para engorda, 

ovinos/caprinos jovens para abate, etc.)

Número de identificação 

do lote de grupo

(Group Lot ID Number)

(Identificação do rebanho—

DDMMAA—número de sequência)

 Estes animais estão em canais de abate. (These animals are in slaughter channels)

Assinatura do proprietário/transportador (Owner/Hauler Signature)

Declaro que as informações acima mencionadas estão corretas e que os animais que constam na lista foram

devidamente classificados
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-80081, 333-33130, 333-47388, 333-70620, 333-98135
and 333-108345 of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. of our report dated January 4, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of Advanced Chip Engineering Technology Inc. included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG

Certified
Public Accountants
Hsinchu, Taiwan
Republic of China
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
# C_2011013EN.01000302.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-543/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 56 EC and 43 EC - Free movement of capital - Golden shares in EDP - Energias de Portugal held by the Portuguese State - Restrictions on the acquisition of holdings and participation in the management of a privatised company)

2011/C 13/05

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun, P. Guerra e Andrade and M. Teles Romão, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, Agent, C. Botelho Moniz and P. Gouveia e Melo, advogados)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Golden shares held by the Portuguese State in the company EDP — Energias de Portugal

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by maintaining for the Portuguese State and other public bodies special rights in EDP — Energias de Portugal such as those provided for in this instance by Law No 11/90 of 5 April 1990 concerning the framework law on privatisations (Lei No 11/90, Lei Quadro das Privatizações), by Decree-Law No 141/2000 of 15 July 2000 approving the fourth phase of the re-privatisation of the share capital of EDP — Electricidade de Portugal SA, and by the articles of association of that company, allocated in connection with golden shares held by the Portuguese State in the share capital of that company, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by maintaining for the Portuguese State and other public bodies special rights in EDP — Energias de Portugal such as those provided for in this instance by Law No 11/90 of 5 April 1990 concerning the framework law on privatisations (Lei No 11/90, Lei Quadro das Privatizações), by Decree-Law No 141/2000 of 15 July 2000 approving the fourth phase of the re-privatisation of the share capital of EDP — Electricidade de Portugal SA, and by the articles of association of that company, allocated in connection with golden shares held by the Portuguese State in the share capital of that company, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC.

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.01.2009.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the annual report on Form 10-K of EMRISE Corporation (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), the undersignedhereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.             the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: April 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA                                   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Carmine T. Oliva                                       |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive  officer) |

 

 
| Dated: April 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ D. JOHN DONOVAN                                                                     |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | D. John Donovan                                                                         |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial  officer and principal accounting officer) |

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
# C_2021481EN.01002101.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/21

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Axpo Trading Ag v Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA — GSE, intervener: Fallimento Esperia SpA

(Case C-705/19) (1)

(2021/C 481/29)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.

---
1 Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:04 PM To: Whiteman, Chad Subject: Redlined version of Tier 3 FRM FRN EO12866 2060-AQ8 6 Attachments: Tier 3 Preamble- redline for OMB 2-25-2014 .doc; Ti er 3 Fuels Regs- redline for OMB 2-25-14.doc; Combined vehicle regs 02 25 2014.docx



### Attached please find a redlined version of the Tier 3 FRM (preamble, vehicle regs, fuels regs). I’ll send the RIA in a separate Email
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     3,314,429
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              102,193
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                85,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3,562,131
<PP&E>                                     450,527
<DEPRECIATION>                            (184,586)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             8,210,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      444,980
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                2,390,000
<COMMON>                                   2,003,951
<OTHER-SE>                                 7,736,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               8,210,516
<SALES>                                    2,034,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,034,693
<CGS>                                      401,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              401,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,352,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            280,489
<INCOME-TAX>                               91,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        189,483
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               189,483
<EPS-BASIC>                              .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .00



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 618 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 618

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 24, 2016.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3624) to amend title 28, United States Code, to prevent fraudulent 
joinder. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of 
a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 
offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 
a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1484

XUE TUAN YAN, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-697-040) Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Christophe, CHRISTOPHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jonathan F. Potter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Xue Tuan Yan, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his third motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and deny the petition for review. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion by the Board. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Stewart v. INS , 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir. 1999). The denial of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with extreme deference, since immigration statutes do not contemplate such motions and the applicable regulations disfavor them. M.A. v. INS , 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc). We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED