alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Larry David ROBERTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. PC-74-56.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 31, 1974.

Larry David Roberts, pro se.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Larry David Roberts, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-72-120, for the crime of Carrying a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony. His punishment was fixed at term of ten (10) years imprisonment, and he now appeals from the denial of post conviction relief.

Defendant alleges, and the Appearance Docket reflects, that he was not present during a part of his trial. This Court ordered an Evidentiary Hearing which was held April 5th and 9th, 1974, to discover the reason for defendant’s absence from his trial.

*1151At the Evidentiary Hearing, defendant testified he left the trial when the noon recess was called at 11:30 a. m. in order to locate Don Jennings who had agreed to testify in defendant’s behalf. Defendant testified he returned to court a day or two later to discover a verdict of guilty had been rendered against him. He actually returned three days later. Defendant further testified he called his bondsman, during his absence, but did not remember whether he called his attorney. He claimed police officers harassed the witness, Don Jennings, subsequent to defendant’s request that he testify.

Don Jennings testified that he and defendant discussed the trial before it commenced, but that he was never informed of the trial date. He further testified he was never intimidated by police officers and that he was not subpoenaed to appear until the time of the Evidentiary Hearing.

Judge Carmon Harris, who presided at defendant’s trial, testified he specifically instructed defendant to be back in court by 1:30 p. m. It was then 11:30 a. m., and the Judge was calling an extended recess for defendant’s benefit.

By enacting 22 O.S. § 583 requiring the presence of a defendant at his trial, the Legislature intended to guarantee the right of the accused to appear at his own trial and, thereby, to be protected from trial during his involuntary absence. We do not feel compelled to extend the meaning of the statute to guarantee an accused the right to voluntarily absent himself from his trial, thereby affectuating a mistrial. Such a strained view would force the retrial of numerous cases which would otherwise lead to judgments. See the following cases construing the similar Arkansas statute: Gore v. State, 52 Ark. 285, 12 S.W. 564; Bond v. State, 63 Ark. 504, 39 S.W. 554; Davidson v. State, 108 Ark. 191, 158 S.W. 1103. See also State of Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 90 S.Ct. 1057, 25 L.Ed.2d 353.

For the foregoing reasons, the Order Denying Post Conviction Relief is accordingly affirmed, and Larry David Roberts is advised that he has now exhausted his state remedies.

BLISS, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
3/19/2004 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT
Case Number: P040346/0347 Assessor: Lee ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 4. Release Activity: Use Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: 984.00 1000.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: 60. 0. Per Site Release: 4.10 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks: Release is to air OR incineration OR wa ter. Incineration release is below threshold of concern.

Consumer use expected?INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040346C SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES SCENARIO #:1 RELEASE ACTIVITY:Use SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION:POTW (Indust., incl udes POTWs which receive ind. disch.) SIC-CODE (S):4952 EXPOSED POPULATION:Adult

WASTE WATER TREATMENT REMOVAL (%) COC (μg/L) RELEASE DAYS PRE-TREATMENT RELEASE

(kg/day) POST-TREATMENT RELEASE

(kg/day) BCF (L/kg) 90. 1000.00 60. 4.1 0.41 0.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER PLANT TYPE % ILE FACILITY STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. ( : g/l) Harmonic

MEAN 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 Harmonic MEAN 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 ALL 50 311.58 116.44 75.70 61.91 1.32 3.52 5.42 6.62 ALL 10 32.75 11.98 7.19 5.98 12.52 34.22 57.02 68.56

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES Exposure Units Drinking Water Results Drinking Water Units Fish Ingestion Results Fish Ingestion

Units 50% 10% 50% 10% Cancer LADD pot 1.69E-06 1.61E-05 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day LADC pot8.65E-05 8.23E-04 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg Chronic Non-Cancer ADD pot 4.22E-06 4.01E-05 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day ADC pot2.16E-04 2.06E-03 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg Acute ADR pot 2.94E-04 2.86E-03 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/dayINITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P040346C

SIC CODE EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1 RELEASE ACTIVITY: Use SIC CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., in cludes POTWs which receive ind. disch.) ASSOCIATED SIC CODES: 4952 from 1011-1999,2211-5199,5511-5599,7211-8099 SIC CODE RESULTS COC ( : g/L) % yr exceeded Days/yr exceeded Release days/year Loading (kg/site/day) Waste Water Treatment (%) High/Avg Analysis 1000.00 2.88E-03 1.05E-02 60 4.10 90.00 HighINITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040346C

DRINKING WATER EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM LANDFILL RELEASES SCENARIO #:1 ACTIVITY:Use RELEASE DESCRIPTION: EXPOSED POPULATION:Adult

NUMBER OF SITES LANDFILL RELEASE (kg/yr) LANDFILLED SLUDGE (kg/yr) MIGRATION FACTOR 1 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT (%) 4. 1000.00 0.00 0.00(Negligible) 0.00

Exposure Units Results ASSUMPTIONS ED (years) AT (years) BW (kg) IR (L/day) Cancer LADD pot(mg/kg/day) 0.00 30.00 75.00 71.80 1.40 LADC pot(mg/L) 0.00 30.00 75.00 NA NA Chronic Non-Cancer ADD pot(mg/kg/day) 0.00 30.00 30.00 71.80 1.40 ADC pot(mg/L) 0.00 30.00 30.00 NA NA
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Escherichia coli Anti-F41 Pilus Polyclonal Antibody (F41 PAb) - 

Lot ID IRP 693

CVB-DAT-5167 01

CVB-DAT

01 Dec 2022

CVB-Released
In the Senate of the United States, 

September 27, 2018. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 4254) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the National 

Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 to strengthen 

the aerospace workforce pipeline by the promotion of Robert 

Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and National Aeronautics and Space Administration internship and fellowship 

opportunities to women, and for other purposes.’’, do pass 

with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women in Aerospace 

3 Education Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ROBERT NOYCE TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM 

5 FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The National Science Foundation 

7 Authorization Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–368; 42 U.S.C. 

8 1862n et seq.) is amended— 
2 

† HR 4254 EAS 

1 (1) in section 10(a)(3)(A)(iv), by inserting ‘‘, in2 cluding research experiences at national laboratories 

3 and NASA centers’’ before the semicolon; and 

4 (2) in section 10A(c)(4)— 

5 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

6 at the end; 

7 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

8 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(C) providing internship opportunities for 

11 fellows, including research experiences at na12 tional laboratories and NASA Centers.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub14 section (a) shall apply with respect to grants awarded on 

15 or after October 1, 2018. 

16 SEC. 3. NASA INTERNSHIP AND FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNI17 TIES. 

18 Not later than October 1, 2018, the Administrator of 

19 the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (in 

20 this section referred to as ‘‘NASA’’) shall institute a process 

21 to encourage the recruitment of qualified candidates who 

22 are women or individuals who are underrepresented in the 

23 fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 

24 (STEM) and computer science for internships and fellow-
3 

† HR 4254 EAS 

1 ships at NASA with relevance to the aerospace sector and 

2 related fields. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 4254 

AMENDMENT
Verifica antes de mover

Artículos recreativos o de campamento

 Mochilas

 Tableros de baloncesto

 Bicicletas

 Botes/Remolques para botes

 Casas rodantes

 Neveras

 Motocicletas

 Casas móviles

 Vehículos recreativos

 Moto de nieve

 Cubiertas de lona

 Tiendas de campaña

 Otro

Objetos de uso exterior 

 Barriles

 Cajas de cartón o madera 

 Postes exteriores

 Recipientes de plantas

 Leña

 Tanque de gas propano o 

aceite

 Bote de basura

 Refrigeradores/Congeladores

 Cobertizos para almacenar

 Contraventanas

 Mosquiteros

 Toldos para ventanas

 Muebles exteriores

 Otros

Materiales para construcción 

 Ladrillos/Bloques de 

hormigón

 Mezcla de cemento

 Madera

 Materiales de techo

 Herramientas 

 Banco de trabajo

 Excavadora/Carretillas

 Tuberías

 Otros

 Artículos de jardín y patio 

 Casas para perros, jaulas 

de conejo, gallinero, etc

 Parrillas 

 Carros

 Invernaderos

 Vallas

 Labradoras 

 Decoraciones de patio

 Herramientas de jardín

 Retroexcavadora

 Segadoras

 Letreros y señales

 Cobertizos

 Camiones y remolques

 Árboles, arbustos y plantas

 Otros

 Juguetes para niños

 Casitas de juego

 Piscinas para niños

 Bicicletas, patinetas 

 Areneros

 Otros

Lista de Control para Residentes

 Viviendo en áreas de cuarentena por la mosca linterna con manchas

IMPORTANTE: Antes de trasladar objetos exteriores fuera del área de cuarentena,

verifique si hay masas de huevo de la mosca linterna con manchas (spotted lanternfly), 

adultos y ninfas. Asegúrese de que todos los artículos estén libres de plagas. Ayuda a 

evitar que esta plaga se propague.
Lista de Control para Residentes

 Viviendo en áreas de cuarentena por la mosca linterna con manchas

IMPORTANTE: Antes de trasladar objetos exteriores fuera del área de cuarentena, 

verifique si hay masas de huevo de la mosca linterna con manchas (spotted lanternfly), 

adultos y ninfas. Asegúrese de que todos los artículos estén libres de plagas. Ayuda a 

evitar que esta plaga se propague.

Si encuentra la mosca linterna con manchas en alguno de estos ciclos de vida, retírela, 

desvitalícela, colóquela en una bolsa sellada, y deseche la bolsa en la basura.

Para más información, visite el sitio web del Departamento de Agricultura de Pennsylvania: 

www.agriculture.pa.gov/spottedlanternfly

Mosca linterna adulta, presente en los meses de otoño.

Ninfas de la mosca linterna con manchas, presentes en primavera

y meses de verano. (Imágenes de Park et al. 2009)

Masas de huevo de la mosca 

linterna con manchas 

(delineado en rojo). Masas de 

huevo presentes en otoño y

meses de invierno, mezclándose 

con su entorno.

Al firmar esta lista de verificación, estoy confirmando que he inspeccionado mi vehículo y los elementos que estoy 

moviendo desde el área de cuarentena de la mosca linterna con manchas, y no veo ninguna masa de huevos o insectos 

dentro o sobre cualquier cosa que esté moviendo.

Firma Dirección Fecha

Por favor escriba su firma, fecha y mantenga esta lista en su vehículo con usted --- utilícela si la necesita.
# C_2021228EN.01001001.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/10

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 41 de Madrid — Spain) — JL v Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Fogasa)

(Case C-841/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 2006/54/EC - Articles 2(1) and 4 - Equal pay for male and female workers - Framework agreement on part-time work - Clause 4 - Part-time workers, primarily female - National guarantee institution for the payment of outstanding claims of relevant workers against their insolvent employers - Ceiling on the payment of those claims - Amount of the ceiling reduced for part-time workers in accordance with the hours worked by the latter in relation to the hours worked by full-time workers - Principle of pro rata temporis)

(2021/C 228/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 41 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JL

Defendant: Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Fogasa)

Operative part of the order

Articles 2(1) and 4 of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, as regards the payment by the liable national institution of the wages and compensation that have not been paid to workers due to the insolvency of their employer, provides for a ceiling to that payment for full-time workers which, in the case of part-time workers, is reduced pro rata temporis according to the hours worked by those workers in relation to those worked by full-time workers.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.

---
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/01/2010 04:06 PM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |"Delores Lancaster" <dlancastr@nwrec.com> 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |11/01/2010 02:58 PM 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |Petition for Reconsideration of Portions of the Final National Emission 

Standards |

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

Dear Ms. King,

Attached is North West Rural Electric Cooperative’s letter to The Honorable 

Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States EPA , regarding support of 

the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s Petition for 

Reconsideration of Portions of the Final National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines. You 

were noted as receiving a copy.

Thank you.

Delores Lancaster

Administrative Assistant
North West REC

PO Box 435

1505 Albany Place SE

Orange City IA 51041

ofc: 712-707-4935

dlancaster@nwrec.coop

From: NORTHWEST REC [mailto:nwrec@nwrec.coop]

Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:40 PM

To: dlancaster@nwrec.coop

Subject: Attached Image

 (See attached file: 2612_001.pdf)
**Exhibit 10.26**

 

**FIRSTAMENDMENT**

**OFTHE**

**SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 2004 RESTRICTEDSTOCK PLAN**

 

**WHEREAS**, this corporation maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”); and 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Company’s Board ofDirectors has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED** that, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Article VIof the Plan, the Plan be and is hereby amended, effective as of the date of adoption, by substituting the following for Section 3.3 of the Plan: 

 

**“SECTION 3.3. RESTRICTED STOCK CERTIFICATES.**

 

Restricted Stock (other than DeferredRestricted Stock) granted under the Plan may be evidenced by one or more certificates registered in the name of the Participant and bearing an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such RestrictedStock. The Company shall retain physical possession of any such certificate, and each Participant awarded such Restricted Stock shall deliver a stock power to the Company, endorsed in blank, relating to the Restricted Stock, during the RestrictedPeriod. Certificates for shares of unrestricted Stock may be delivered to the Participant promptly after, and only after, the Restricted Period shall have expired without forfeiture in respect of such shares of Restricted Stock. To the extent thePlan or any Award Agreement provides for issuance of stock certificates to reflect the issuance of shares of Common Stock, the issuance may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the applicablerules of any stock exchange.” 

 

*        *        * 

 

I, W Granger Souder, Jr., Secretary of Sky Financial Group, Inc., hereby certify that the foregoing is a correct copy of resolutions dulyadopted by the Board of Directors of said corporation on February 16, 2005, and that the resolutions have not been changed or repealed.
Exhibit 10.14
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 $450,000
    
    December 24, 2008
 MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC. K. Tucker Andersen FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($450,000),
 [the average of the closing prices per share on each of the 20 days
prior to the signing of this Note]
    MILESTONE IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY NEW JERSEY OR FEDERAL
COURT SITTING IN NEW JERSEY OVER ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO ANY
OF THE LOAN DOCUMENTS, AND MILESTONE HEREBY AGREES AND CONSENTS THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY METHODS OF
SERVICE OF PROCESS PROVIDED FOR UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, ALL SERVICE OF PROCESS IN ANY SUCH SUIT,
ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY NEW JERSEY OR FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN NEW JERSEY MAY BE MADE BY
CERTIFIED OR REGISTERED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, DIRECTED TO MILESTONE AT THE ADDRESS
INDICATED BELOW, AND SERVICE SO MADE SHALL BE COMPLETE FIVE DAYS AFTER THE SAME SHALL HAVE BEEN SO
MAILED.
 MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC.By:
    /s/Joe W.  MartinJoe W. Martin, Chief Executive Officer
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00192

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1052722

Style: Irvin White

v Angela Stanlee White and the Office of the Attorney General of Texas

Date motion filed * : May 9, 2013

Type of moti on: Motion for Rehearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: no

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel cons ists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

Date: September 4 , 2013
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5471-S5472]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       FAA SUNSETS EXTENSION ACT

  Ms. KLOBUCHAR. Mr. President, on July 19, the Judiciary Committee 
considered legislation to reauthorize the title VII provisions of the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. These surveillance authorities 
are vital to our

[[Page S5472]]

national security, and it is imperative that they be reauthorized 
before they expire at the end of this year. The reauthorization bill is 
narrow in scope, and many amendments were proposed at the committee 
markup that had little or nothing to do with the reauthorization of 
FISA. As I stated during the markup, I may have supported or been open 
to working out a compromise on several of the amendments in other 
contexts. However, I voted in opposition to all of the extraneous 
amendments offered because I felt their adoption would threaten the 
timely passage of the FISA reauthorization bill. That is not a risk I 
was willing to take.
  In particular, as for Senator Kyl's amendment to criminalize certain 
behavior that would reward past terrorist acts and Senator Grassley's 
amendment to impose the death penalty on terrorists who use weapons of 
mass destruction, I want to make clear that I strongly oppose the 
funding of terrorism and I believe that terrorists should be subject to 
the death penalty. I support the objectives of both of these 
amendments, but I was concerned that their adoption by the committee 
could delay or prevent passage of the FISA reauthorization bill. I am 
prepared to work with Senator Kyl and Senator Grassley to address these 
important issues at a more appropriate time going forward.
  I hope that these amendments and others are raised in the appropriate 
context so they can be adequately addressed.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of September 30, 1997 and the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,118,707
<SECURITIES>                                13,038,769
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,082,498
<PP&E>                                       4,008,352
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,918,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,284,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,026,472
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,709
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,322,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,284,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,050,105
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,104,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,054,362)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,054,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,054,362)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>