alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bi Lee 

®~. _r. rick 

I

M

i■~~

ii SO40aj F(C 

"~M 

Frank G. Peny, Sr. Don Perry Frank G. Perry, Jr. J. R. Holton 

Chafrman of fhs 8oard Presfdent V',ce President Secretary / Treasurer 

Phil Liles Mike Liily Tretta McNeili 

V/r.e Pr+esldent Vice President Assistant Secr+etary 

Sales & iNarketing Manufacturing / Treasurer 

Apri112, 2013 

A1ex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

David Rostker, U.S. Sni.all Business Administration, Office of Advocacy 

Courtney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget 

Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: 

I am writing today as the owner and president of a small brick manufacturing company 

that has the potential to be significantly impacted by the upcoming MACT standard for 

major sources in the: brick and structural clay processing indushy. We are not a formal 

Smal1 Entity Representative (SER) in the cuxrent review panel being conducted under the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). However, all of our 

industry is working,together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are 

keeping us apprised of the activities on this rule. We consider them to be spealdng on all. 

industry's behalf as they work with you. 

Since 

Y ~ 

3704 Hawkins Ave. • P. 0. Box 1027 • Sanford, N.C. 27330 • Bus.: 919-774-4800 9 Fax.: 919-774-7557 • Toll Free: 800-572-7559
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 515

- CV

IN RE Leopoldo LEAL

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 17, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 20, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 One of the proceedings relator complains of is Cause No. 328050 , styled State of Texas v. Leopoldo Leal

, in the

Municipal Court City of Alice, Jim Wells County, the Honorable Edie Gonzales

- Lemon presiding. The other

co mplaint relator makes relates to a proceeding he contends he filed in County Court at Law, Jim Wells County,

Texas; however, no cause number in that proceeding, if any exists, has been provided.
Exhibit  32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Business International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended  December 31, 2003, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned in
the  capacity  and  on  the  date  indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
his  knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.  The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  February  20,  2003
/s/Albert  Reda
Albert  R.  Reda
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer


                                       28
<PAGE>
# C_2021044EN.01004002.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/40

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — HG, IH v Bankia SA

(Case C-527/19) (1)

(2021/C 44/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         998,339
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,602
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,342,286
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    145,600
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,500,097
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,502,000
<LOANS>                                     34,845,689
<ALLOWANCE>                                    387,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,808,505
<DEPOSITS>                                  39,154,356
<SHORT-TERM>                                   484,755
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            127,583
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,948
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,985,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              43,808,505
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                752,408
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,552
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                52,700
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               829,660
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             442,437
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             448,055
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          381,605
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   36,533
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                344,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,599
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      27,599
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,386,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                831,244
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               378,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   46,335
<RECOVERIES>                                    19,202
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              387,400
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           387,400
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Colin
Binny President (Chief Executive Officer) and Francis Foong Keong Kwong, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Colin Binny
-------------------------------------
Colin Binny
President (Chief Executive Officer)
February 7, 2005

/s/ Francis Foong Keong Kwong
-------------------------------------
Francis Foong Keong Kwong
Chief Financial Officer
February 7, 2005
# C_2019004EN.01004301.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/43

---

Action brought on 9 November 2018 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac)

(Case T-662/18)

(2019/C 4/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: romwell GmbH & Co. KG (Breitscheidt, Germany) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Mark at issue: Application for EU word mark twistpac — Application for registration No 17 219 163

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2018 in Case R 336/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**499 CA 15-00807**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

INDUS PVR LLC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAA-SHARDA, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ROSHAN HOSPITALITY, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

FRANK A. ALOI, ROCHESTER, AND ROBERT J. LUNN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN C. NUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered December 26, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant MAA-Sharda, Inc. for leave to reargue and renew its opposition to plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Indus PVR LLC v MAA-Sharda, Inc. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 10, 2016]).

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amaru, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



08/19/2002                                 /s/ Sahra Partida
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009220EN.01000801.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus (Estonia)) — Pärlitigu OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus

(Case C-56/08) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Subheading CN 05119110 - Subheading CN 03032200 - Frozen backbones of farmed Atlantic salmon - Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 - Anti-dumping duties)

2009/C 220/12

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Tallinna Halduskohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pärlitigu OÜ

Applicant:

Defendant: Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tallinna Halduskohus — Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1) in the version applicable at the material time — Validity of Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 of 17 January 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway (OJ 2006 L 15, p. 1) — Classification under heading 0303220015 (farmed salmon, frozen, other) or 0511911000 (fish waste) for the purpose of levying anti-dumping duty — Frozen backbones of farmed Atlantic salmon obtained after filleting the fish

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature, which constitutes Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that frozen backbones of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), obtained after filleting the fish, must be classified under CN heading 0303 22 00 if the goods are fit for human consumption at the time that they are cleared through customs, which it is for the national court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

This Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 10-K/A), of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 5, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM J. DOYLE                                                             
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | William J. Doyle President
and Chief Executive Officer                           
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: July 5, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ WAYNE R. BROWNLEE                                                            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Wayne R. Brownlee
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K, section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5209]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1210
                       PROTECT THE RIGHT TO VOTE

  (Ms. CHU asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Ms. CHU. Few things are as sacred as the right to vote. Generations 
have fought, bled, and died so that you and I can have a voice in our 
democracy. This is why we must guard against measures that take this 
away, like the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which prohibited all 
Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized citizens so that they 
would not be able to vote. It lasted 60 years, until 1943, preventing 
people who'd lived in this country for decades from exercising their 
voices.
  Laws like this, poll taxes, or literacy tests, should be a thing of 
the past in America. Every U.S. citizen, no matter what their 
background, should have access to the polls. But today, State 
governments across the country are enacting laws making it much harder 
for as many as 5 million Americans to vote, requiring, for instance, 
photo IDs for grandmothers who voted for years but no longer drive.
  When barely half of Americans vote, we should not be erecting more 
barriers to democracy. We should be removing obstacles. We must protect 
the right to vote.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lawrence R. Hoffman, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Covalent Group, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                         
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Lawrence R. Hoffman                                                 
|                      |  | Lawrence R. Hoffman Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ibis Technology Corporation:

         The audits referred to in our report dated February 2, 2001, included
the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, included in the annual report on Form 10-K. The
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-1174) on Form S-1, (No. 33-78440) on Form S-3, (No.
333-9237) on Form S-3, (No. 333-82497) on Form S-3, (No. 333-9239) on Form
S-8, (No. 33-81452) on Form S-8, (No. 333-45247) on Form S-8, and (No.
333-36706) on Form S-8 of Ibis Technology Corporation of our report dated
February 2, 2001, relating to the balance sheets of Ibis Technology
Corporation as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ending December 31, 2000, which report appears in the
December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Ibis Technology Corporation.



                                                    KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 20, 2001
Order entered October 7 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00588

- CR

TRENT LEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 08

- 45216

- M



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

On August 11, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On October 3, 2016, we received the reporter’s record.

Because findings are no longer necessary, we VACATE the August 11, 2016 order.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
##### 



CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paula
J. Meiler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Paula J. Meiler
Paula J. Meiler
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer *This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.   24.