alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Peter J. DiCorti, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, do herebycertify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of  Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: March 12 ,2004 | /s/ PETER  J. DICORTI   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | Peter J. DiCorti        |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained byUnify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.*

 

----
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors of Sky Financial Group, Inc. hereby authorize and appoint Marty E. Adams,
Chairman, President and CEO, and/or Kevin T. Thompson, Executive Vice President and CFO, as our agents, as attorneys-in-fact, with full power to act for us and all of us, for the purpose of subscribing our names to the Form 10-K thereof to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for the purpose of making any changes or amendments necessary or desirable to such documents and to any documents ancillary thereto, with the same powers and to the same effect as we may do if
personally present.

Signed in counterpart and dated this 17thday of January, 2007.



|                          |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                          |  | 
|/s/ George N. Chandler II |  |  |  | /s/ Robert C. Duvall   
|George N. Chandler II     |  |  |  | Robert C. Duvall       
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Marylouise Fennell    |  |  |  | /s/ D. James Hilliker  
|Marylouise Fennell        |  |  |  | D. James Hilliker      
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Fred H. Johnson III   |  |  |  | /s/ Jonathan A. Levy   
|Fred H. Johnson III       |  |  |  | Jonathan A. Levy       
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Gerard P. Mastroianni |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory L. Ridler  
|Gerard P. Mastroianni     |  |  |  | Gregory L. Ridler      
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Emerson J. Ross, Jr.  |  |  |  | /s/ C. Gregory Spangler
|Emerson J. Ross, Jr.      |  |  |  | C. Gregory Spangler    
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Joseph N. Tosh II     |  |  |  | /s/ R. John Wean III   
|Joseph N. Tosh II         |  |  |  | R. John Wean III
# C_2020378EN.01001001.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — achtung! GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-214/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) - Distinctive character - None)

(2020/C 378/11)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: achtung! GmbH (represented by: G.J. Seelig and D. Bischof, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders achtung! GmbH to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders achtung! GmbH to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.

---
# C_2020137EN.01004601.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2020 — IFSUA v Council

(Case T-251/18) (1)

(Fisheries - Conservation of marine biological resources - Regulation (EU) 2018/120 - Measures concerning the fishing for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) - Action for annulment brought by an association - Article 263 TFEU - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern of the members of the association - Admissibility - Competence of the European Union to regulate recreational fisheries - Legal certainty - Protection of legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination - Proportionality - Precautionary principle - Freedom of association and freedom to conduct a business)

(2020/C 137/72)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. Gui Mori and R. Agut Jubert, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and P. Plaza García, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Morales Puerta, F. Moro and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Council Regulation (EU) 2018/120 of 23 January 2018 fixing for 2018 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/127 (OJ 2018 L 27, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interim proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interim proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                       591
<INVENTORY>                                     58,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,984
<PP&E>                                         485,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 161,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 546,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,588
<BONDS>                                        258,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   546,799
<SALES>                                        782,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               782,683
<CGS>                                          567,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  713,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,778
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,778
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office.

# ACTION:

Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

# SUMMARY:

The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) established MACPAC to review Medicaid and CHIP access and payment policies and to advise Congress on issues affecting Medicaid and CHIP. CHIPRA gave the Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing MACPAC's members. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is now accepting nominations for MACPAC appointments that will be effective May 2024. Nominations should be sent to the email address listed below. Acknowledgement of receipt will be provided within a week of submission.

# DATES:

Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later than January 25, 2024, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit letters of nomination and resumes to                         *MACPACappointments@gao.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Corissa Kiyan-Fukumoto at (206) 287-4808 or                         *KiyanFukumotoC@gao.gov*                         if you do not receive an acknowledgment or need additional information. For general information, contact GAO's Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.                    

*Authority:*42 U.S.C. 1396.                    

Gene L. Dodaro,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2023-28102 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
#### Marshall Bros., Inc., Appellant, v Economy Paving Co., Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint granted. Memorandum: It was an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to deny plaintiff’s motion for permission to amend the complaint to allege a cause of action for breach of contract. The proposed amended cause of action for breach of contract rests upon the same facts as the cause of action asserted in the original complaint. Although plaintiff’s complaint was unartfully drafted, in that it couched plaintiff’s cause of action in terms of negligent performance of a contract *(see, Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R. R. Co.,*70 NY2d 382), it was apparent that plaintiff was seeking damages for a breach of contract.

Defendant contends that it would be unjust at this late stage in the litigation to permit the amendment to the complaint because that would, in effect, relieve plaintiff from any default in replying to the alleged counterclaim in defendant’s answer and from the effect of the preclusion order granted as a result of plaintiff’s failure to provide a bill of particulars. To avoid those results, we grant the motion subject to the condition, unless otherwise ordered by the trial Court, that the order of preclusion remain in effect and operate to preclude plaintiff from giving evidence at the trial of the items of which particulars were requested in the demand for a bill of particulars, and the further condition that, if the alleged counterclaim is inserted in defendant’s answer to the amended complaint, and if a reply is required, plaintiff shall not be permitted to reply unless it moves for and is granted relief from any prior default in pleading. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.— Amended Complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### Loui v. State

16880

12/19/94

Reversed in part & Affirmed in part
# C_2020433EN.01000801.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Aachen — Germany) — Marvin M. v Kreis Heinsberg

(Case C-112/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/126/EC - Article 2(1) and Article 11(4) - Driving licence - Mutual recognition - Extent of the obligation to recognise - Driving licence having been the subject of an exchange - Exchange made at a time when the right to drive had been withdrawn by the issuing Member State - Fraud - Refusal to recognise the driving licence issued in the context of the exchange)

(2020/C 433/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Aachen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Marvin M.

Defendant: Kreis Heinsberg

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 2(1) of Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences must be interpreted as meaning that mutual recognition, without any formality, which it lays down, is applicable to a driving licence issued following an exchange under Article 11(1) of that directive, subject to the exceptions provided for by that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 2(1) of Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences must be interpreted as meaning that mutual recognition, without any formality, which it lays down, is applicable to a driving licence issued following an exchange under Article 11(1) of that directive, subject to the exceptions provided for by that directive;

| 2. | The second subparagraph of Article 11(4) of Directive 2006/126 must be interpreted as meaning that it allows a Member State to refuse to recognise a driving licence which was the subject of an exchange pursuant to Article 11(1) of that directive, on the ground that that Member State had, prior to that exchange, withdrawn the authorisation to drive from the holder of that driving licence. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The second subparagraph of Article 11(4) of Directive 2006/126 must be interpreted as meaning that it allows a Member State to refuse to recognise a driving licence which was the subject of an exchange pursuant to Article 11(1) of that directive, on the ground that that Member State had, prior to that exchange, withdrawn the authorisation to drive from the holder of that driving licence.

---

(1)  OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.

---
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 12,  2010
    /s/ Paula J. MeilerPaula J. MeilerSenior Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
otherwise stated in such filing.
*******EXHIBIT 3.3*******

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE 

AMENDED ANDRESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 

OF 

E COM VENTURES, INC. 

a Florida corporation 

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.1006 of the Florida Business Corporation Act, the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the “Corporation”) are hereby amendedas follows: 

1. Article I of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby deleted in its entirety andreplaced with the following: 

The name of the Corporation is “Perfumania Holdings, Inc.” 

2. The foregoing amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation was recommended by the Board of Directors of theCorporation and submitted to the shareholders of the Corporation for approval at the special meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation, held on August 8, 2008. The amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of theCorporation was approved by the shareholders of the Corporation, with the number of votes cast for the amendment being sufficient for approval in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized officer of the Corporation has executed these Articles of Amendment to the Amended and RestatedArticles of Incorporation as of this 8th day of August, 2008.
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.We consent to the incorporation in the following Registration Statements of Potash Corporation ofSaskatchewan Inc.: **•** Registration Statement No. 33-37855 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-19215 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-93773 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-53531 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-75742 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-75744 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-113945 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-124677 on Form S-8;  **•** Registration Statement No. 333-89350 on Form S-3; and  **•** Registration Statement No. 33-57920 on Form S-3of our reports dated February 14, 2006 (except for Note 34 of the consolidated financial statementswhich is as of February 24, 2006) (which audit report on the consolidated financial statementsexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by IndependentRegistered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States of America Reporting Differences referringto changes in accounting principles), relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc., and management’s report on the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PotashCorporation of Saskatchewan Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPIndependent Registered Chartered AccountantsSaskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86938-86939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Integrated Photonics Institute for 
Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American 
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 11, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Integrated Photonics 
Institute for

[[Page 86939]]

Manufacturing Innovation operating under the name of the American 
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics (``AIM Photonics'') 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Specifically, Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, Atlanta, 
GA; and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Falls Church, VA, have 
been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AIM Photonics intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 16, 2016, AIM Photonics filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 25, 2016 (81 FR 48450).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 1, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69671).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27564 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2018161EN.01007001.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/70

---

Action brought on 9 March 2018 — Multifit Tiernahrungs v EUIPO (TAKE CARE)

(Case T-181/18)

(2018/C 161/87)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘TAKE CARE’ — Application for registration No 16 254 898

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 January 2018 in Case R 845/2017-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---