alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                         |   | Percentage |   | State of |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|------------|--------|---------------|
| Subsidiary                                   |   | Owned      |   | Incorporation |
|                                         |   |       |   |          |
| Community Bank of Tri-County                 |   |       | 100    | %             | Maryland |
|                                         |   |       |   |          |   |
| Tri-County Capital Trust I                   |   |       | 100    | %             | Delaware |
|                                         |   |       |   |          |   |
| Tri-County Capital Trust II                  |   |       | 100    | %             | Delaware |
|                                         |   |       |   |          |   |
| Subsidiaries of Community Bank of Tri-County |   |       |   |          |   |
|                                         |   |       |   |          |   |
| Community Mortgage Corporation of Tri-County |   |       | 100    | %             | Maryland |

----
H. Res. 594 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 2, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 3700) to provide housing opportunities in the United 

States through modernization of various housing programs, 

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Financial Services. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 

recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now 

printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 

rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting 
2 

•HRES 594 EH 

of the text of Rules Committee Print 114–42. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment to that 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 

Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in 

the nature of a substitute made in order as original text. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
3 

•HRES 594 EH 

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UnifyCorporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Peter J. DiCorti, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: March 11,  2005 | /s/ PETER J. DICORTI    |
|------------------------|-------------------------|
|                   | Peter J. DiCorti        |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by UnifyCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

----
# C_2009044EN.01002101.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — In the proceedings brought by Erich Stamm, Anneliese Hauser

(Case C-13/08) (1)

1

(Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons - Equal treatment - Self-employed frontier workers - Agricultural lease - Agricultural structure)

(2009/C 44/35)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Erich Stamm, Anneliese Hauser

Interested party: Regierungspräsidium Freiburg

Interested party:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 12(1), 13(1) and 15(1) of Annex I to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999 (OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6) — Applicability of the principle of equal treatment to self-employed frontier workers — Farmer with Swiss nationality residing in Switzerland having entered into a lease agreement for land for agricultural use located in Germany.

Operative part of the judgment

Pursuant to Article 15(1) of Annex I to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999, a contracting party must accord to the ‘self employed frontier workers’, within the meaning of Article 13 of that annex, of the other contracting party no less favourable treatment as regards access to self-employed activity and the pursuit thereof in the host State than that which is accorded by that State to its own nationals.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
DECLARATION OF DENNIS BURLING Lancaster County ) ) ss State ofNebraska ) I, Dennis Burling, declare under penalty ofperjury that the following statement is true and correct: 1. The facts stated herein are based on mypersonal knowledge unless stated otherwise. 2. I am employed bythe Nebraska Department ofEnvironmental Quality as the Information Technology Manager. In my capacity as Information Technology Manager for the Department, I have personal knowledge ofthe facts set forth below. I am familiar with the Department ofEnvironmental Quality and Information Technology Section's procedures for submitting and placingpublic notices ofsignificant events on the Department's webpage, www.deq.ne.gov. 3. The Information Technology Section, under my supervision and direction, has developed an online public notice process. This process allows Department staffto submit public notices and related documents to appear within the Public Notice portion of the agency web pages. A record ofthis information, including the person initiating the public notice, the date submitted, date the public notice appeared on the website, and the date on which the public notice will be automaticallyremoved from the website are indicated in Attachment 1 to this declaration, including a copy ofthe information that appears on the website.

14. Public notice ofthe Infrastructure SIP, Comment Period from February 19, 2015 to March 23 , 2015, has been placed on the Department's website in accordance with the procedures described above for 30 days.

DENNIS BURLIN

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 

## 15 day ofMarch 2015, in Lincoln, Nebraska.**~** GENERAlIlOTARY·State of Nebraska I1Ij KERRIE CARPENTER**~** My Comm. Exp. Feb
. 19, 2016

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donovan Chin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Donovan ChinDonovan ChinChief Financial OfficerDecember 26, 2007
21880

#### State v. Inoue

Affirmed
Order No. 97-34

18803

April 21, 1997

#### State v. Lau

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.02




CERTIFICATION




I, Dennis E. Bunday, certify that:




1.  I have reviewed
this report on Form 10-K of Williams Controls Inc.;




2.  Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and




c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.


|Date: December 7, 2005 |  | /s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAY Dennis E. Bunday Chief
Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudy Armando MORALES-NAVARRO, also known as Benito Deras Aguirre, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40924

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Norman E. Mclnnis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rudy Armando Morales-Navarro appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegally re-entering the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court sentenced Morales-Navarro to 46 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release.

Morales-Navarro asserts that, under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and its progeny, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it permits a sentencing *50judge to increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum based on a factor that need not be submitted to a jury for proof or admitted by the defendant. Morales-Navarro concedes that this argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review. This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“ ‘unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.’” *United States v. Izaguirre-Flores,*405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.2005) (citation omitted), *petition for cert. filed*(July 22, 2005) (No. 05-5469).

For the first time on appeal, Morales-Navarro argues that his sentence was unconstitutional because it was enhanced pursuant to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime rejected in *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Morales-Navarro has not established plain error with regard to his *Booker*claim because he has not established that his sentence affected his substantial rights. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520-22 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517); *United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). Morales-Navarro also argues that the error was a “structural” one that is not susceptible to plain-error analysis or, alternatively, that plain-error prejudice should be presumed. We have rejected such arguments. *United States v. Martinez-Lugo,*411 F.3d 597, 601 (5th Cir.2005).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED FROM 9/30/96.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         355,542
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,326,212
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         750,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           745,733
<LOANS>                                     26,816,470
<ALLOWANCE>                                    295,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,110,616
<DEPOSITS>                                  31,103,971
<SHORT-TERM>                                   252,082
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            107,358
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,933
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,591,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              35,110,616
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,721,181
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               26,281
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               298,225
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,045,687
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,120,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,120,077
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          925,610
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   34,162
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                869,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,528
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     115,528
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.79
<LOANS-NON>                                    114,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    13,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               107,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 98,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               260,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   15,805
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,084
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              295,441
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           295,441
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT  12.1


             FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        2002            2001            2000            1999            1998
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
<S>                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss                              $ (8,548)       $(11,472)       $(14,774)       $ (8,552)       $(12,999)
Add:
  Fixed charges                         12,315          13,890          14,361          14,489          14,726
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
Adjusted earnings                     $  3,767        $  2,418        $   (413)       $  5,937        $  1,727
                                      ========        ========        ========        ========        ========

Fixed charges:
   Interest on indebtedness and
     amortization of deferred
     financing costs                  $ 12,315        $ 12,845        $ 13,238        $ 13,528        $ 13,792
   Portion of rents
     representative of interest
     factor                                 --           1,045           1,123             961             934
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
   Total fixed charges                $ 12,315        $ 13,890        $ 14,361        $ 14,489        $ 14,726
                                      ========        ========        ========        ========        ========

Deficiency of earnings to fixed
   charges                            $  8,548        $ 11,472        $ 14,774        $  8,552        $ 12,999
                                      ========        ========        ========        ========        ========
</TABLE>
# C_2019164EN.01006102.xml

| 13.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/61

---

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2019 — Telenet v Commission

(Case T-470/18) (1)

(2019/C 164/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                EXHIBIT 10(p)(2)

                              SECTION 401(k) PLAN
                              -------------------

                    Amendment No. 2 dated December 15, 1995


    1.  Section 4.10 of the Plan is amended by adding the following new Section 
4.10(c):

        (c) Excess Deferrals. To the extent necessary to comply with the limits
            ----------------
        set forth in Sections 4.7 and 4.8 of the Plan, Matching Contributions
        shall be forfeited. Such forfeited amounts shall be used to reduce the
        Company's future contributions to the Plan.

    2.  Section 9.7 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence 
of subsection (a) thereof and substituting the following therefor:

        In the absence of receipt of such written direction with respect to any
        such shares three (3) business days before the exercise of any
        shareholder rights, the Committee shall vote any allocated but
        uninstructed shares in the exercise of its sole discretion.
<PAGE>
 
    3.  Section 9.7 of the Plan is further amended by deleting subsection (c) 
thereof, renaming subsection (d) as subsection (c), and adding the following 
language at the end thereof:

        In the absence of receipt of such written direction three (3) business
        days prior to the exercise of such shareholder rights, the Committee
        shall exercise such rights in its sole discretion.

    4.  A restatement to reflect this change and any other amendments since 
April 24, 1995, is authorized; any conforming changes to the Plan Trust are 
authorized.