alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1090 

AN ACT 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to provide eligibility for broadcasting facilities to receive certain disaster assistance, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1090 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Informa3 tion Improvement Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF BROADCASTING FACILITIES FOR 

5 CERTAIN DISASTER ASSISTANCE. 

6 (a) PRIVATE NONPROFIT FACILITY DEFINED.—Sec7 tion 102(11)(B) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

8 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(11)(B)) 

9 is amended by inserting ‘‘broadcasting facilities,’’ after 

10 ‘‘workshops,’’. 

11 (b) CRITICAL SERVICES DEFINED.—Section 

12 406(a)(3)(B) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

13 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5172(a)(3)(B)) 

14 is amended by striking ‘‘communications,’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘communications (including broadcast and telecommuni16 cations),’’. 

Passed the Senate September 17, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1090 

AN ACT 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

disaster assistance, and for other purposes. bility for broadcasting facilities to receive certain and Emergency Assistance Act to provide eligi-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gehl
Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1995 and consolidated
statements of income for the twelve month period ended December 31, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            3266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    78476
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4572
<INVENTORY>                                      23320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                102166
<PP&E>                                           53646
<DEPRECIATION>                                   33331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  133498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29561
<BONDS>                                          46666<F1>
<COMMON>                                           622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       55057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    133498
<SALES>                                         153452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                153452
<CGS>                                           108838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   108838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9163
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations
<F2>Not reported
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008022EN.01004602.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/46

---

Action brought on 16 November 2007 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)

(Case T-425/07)

(2008/C 22/87)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (Częstochowa, Poland) (represented by D. Rzążewska, legal adviser)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2007 in Case R 1274/2006-4 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2007 in Case R 1274/2006-4 in its entirety;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘100’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 28 and 41 (Application No 3 875 408).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Articles 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (1) since, in the applicant's submission, the sign ‘100’ is neither descriptive nor devoid of distinctive character in relation to the goods and services indicated.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5328]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. WELCH:
       H.R. 6226.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18: The Congress shall have 
     Power To . . . make all Laws which shall be necessary and 
     proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and 
     all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the 
     Government of the United States, or in any Department or 
     Officer thereof.
```
# C_2009167EN.01000801.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/8

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 April 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Hungary

(Case C-374/08) (1)

1

2009/C 167/16

Language of the case: Hungarian

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

1

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Reynaldo Morales v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00549

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 54065

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

After dismissing this appeal, the Court denied appellant’s motions for rehearing and for en

banc reconsideration on June 21, 2022 . Mandate issued on September 2, 2022.

Appellant filed a motion to reinstate on September 2 , 2022. Two other documents were received from appellant on September 21, 2022 and October 14, 2022.

An appellate court’s plenary power expires 30 days after it overrules all timely filed motions for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 19.1(b). After plenary power expires, an appellate court may not vacate or modify its judgment, but it may correct a clerical error in its judgment or opinion, issue an d its recall mandate as provided by the rules, enforce or suspend enforcement o f its judgment as provided by law, order or modify the amount and type of security required to suspend a judgment

, decide sufficien cy of the sureties under rule 24, and order its opinion published. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 19.3.

Because our mandate issued on September 2, 2022, the Court lacks plenary power to take any further action in this case on the motion filed on September 2, 2022. Fu ture filings , if any, will be marked as filed, but no action will be taken.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Justice Richard Hightower

______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ December 22, 2022

_____
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5291]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. CARNAHAN:
        H.R. 6188.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 1. ``All legislative Powers herein 
     granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, 
     which shall consist of a Senate and a House of 
     Representatives.''
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5401]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 2573. Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
     Johanns, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Burr, Mr. Thune, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
     Kyl, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Rubio, Mr. McCain, Mr. 
     Grassley, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Kirk, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Hoeven, 
     Mr. Shelby, and Mr. Isakson) proposed an amendment to the 
     bill S. 3412, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
     provide tax relief to middle-class families.
       SA 2574. Mrs. HUTCHISON submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill S. 3414, to enhance the 
     security and resiliency of the cyber and communications 
     infrastructure of the United States; which was ordered to lie 
     on the table.
       SA 2575. Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Reed, 
     Mr. Menendez, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Schumer, and Mrs. 
     Feinstein) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
     him to the bill S. 3414, supra; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.
       SA 2576. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 2577. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 2578. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 2579. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 2580. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.

                          ____________________
```
#### Crown Realty Company, Appellant, v Crown Heights Jewish Community Council et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. David Fischer, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

— In an action to determine the ownership of property, the plaintiff and the third-party defendant appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated October 5, 1989, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing certain related counterclaims and third-party claims asserted against them alleging, *inter alia,*a constructive trust, and for cancellation of a notice of pendency.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Once the party moving has demonstrated an entitlement to summary judgment, the party opposing the motion must demonstrate, by admissible evidence, the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial of the action or tender a reasonable excuse for the failure to do so *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). We find that there are triable issues of fact with respect to the counterclaim to impose a constructive trust upon the property in question.

Generally, before granting the equitable remedy of a constructive trust, four elements must be established: (1) a confidential or fiduciary relationship, (2) a promise, express or implied, (3) a transfer in reliance thereon, and (4) unjust enrichment *(see, Sharp v Kosmalski,*40 NY2d 119, 121; *Binenfeld v Binenfeld,*146 AD2d 663). Notably, these elements are not rigid, but are flexible considerations for the court to apply in determining whether to impose a constructive trust *(Lester v Zimmer,*147 AD2d 340). We find that whether, *inter alia,*the plaintiffs relationship with the defendants satisfied the initial requisite of a confidential or fiduciary relationship is a factual issue which can only be resolved at the trial *(see, Mendel v Hewitt,*161 AD2d 849).

Moreover, we find that the Statute of Frauds does not bar a cause of action to impose a constructive trust since, by its very *152nature, a constructive trust does not require a writing *(see, Spodek v Riskin,*150 AD2d 358; *Vanasco v Angiolelli,*97 AD2d 462). Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4312

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs permits the display of Battlefield Crosses in national 
                              cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2017

 Mr. Renacci (for himself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Wenstrup, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. 
 Jordan, Mr. Latta, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Davidson, Ms. 
Kaptur, Mr. Turner, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Joyce 
  of Ohio, and Mr. Stivers) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs permits the display of Battlefield Crosses in national 
                              cemeteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fallen Warrior Battlefield Cross 
Memorial Act''.

SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF BATTLEFIELD CROSSES IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES.

    Section 2403 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) The Secretary may not prohibit the display of a 
Battlefield Cross in any national cemetery.
    ``(2) In this subsection, the term `Battlefield Cross' means a 
memorial monument in honor of fallen members of the Armed Forces that 
may include a replica of an inverted rifle, boots, helmets, and 
identification tag.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of BioLargo, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that Amendment No. 1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: January 3, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Dennis Calvert
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Dennis Calvert Chief Executive
Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: January 3, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Dennis Calvert
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Dennis Calvert Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1374]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING BARBARA ANTHONY, VALDINE ATWOOD, BARBARA DRISKO, AND SALLY 
                                 JACOBS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the nominations of 
Barbara Anthony, Valdine Atwood, Barbara Drisko, and Sally Jacobs for 
the Mighty Women of Washington County Elder Award.
  The Mighty Women of Washington County is a group of strong, 
compassionate women who collaborate with businesses in Washington 
County to promote positive social and economic change in the community. 
This self sustaining organization continues to draw together talented 
and dedicated women who are committed to the region. Since 2006, the 
Mighty Women of Washington County have grown their membership to over 
180 strong representing business owners, government workers and 
volunteers. Together, their remarkable efforts have made a positive 
impact in the areas of homelessness, health care and other social 
issues.
  In June of this year, the organization held its first event 
``Celebrating the Mighty Women of Washington County'' in the town of 
Machias. At the event, Barbara Anthony, Valdine Atwood, Barbara Drisko, 
and Sally Jacobs were nominated for the Mighty Women Elder Award. This 
recognition is offered to members of the organization who embody 
exceptional character and citizenship.
  Each of these women is a pillar of the Washington County community 
and they are all tremendously deserving of this recognition. Their 
energy, commitment to helping others, and devotion to the region are an 
inspiration to future generations of Washington County women and to 
Mainers throughout the state.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me in congratulating these exceptional women 
for being recognized through this honor and thanking them all that they 
do for their community.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          38,700
<SECURITIES>                                   109,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,900
<PP&E>                                         916,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 958,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,200
<BONDS>                                        463,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     402,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   958,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008064EN.01004401.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/44

---

Action brought on 20 December 2007 — Cabel Hall Citrus v OHIM — Casur (EGLÉFRUIT)

(Case T-488/07)

(2008/C 64/73)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Cabel Hall Citrus Ltd (Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands) (represented by: C. Rogers, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Casur S. Coop. Andaluza (Viator, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 19 September 2007 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 293/2007-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 19 September 2007 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 293/2007-1;

| — | direct the relevant Cancellation Division of OHIM to declare invalid Community trade mark registration No 3 517 431 EGLÉFRUIT; |
| --- | --- |

—

direct the relevant Cancellation Division of OHIM to declare invalid Community trade mark registration No 3 517 431 EGLÉFRUIT;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘EGLÉFRUIT’ for goods and services in classes 29, 30 and 31 — Community trade mark No 3 517 431

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Casur S. Coop. Andaluza

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The Community and national word and figurative marks ‘UGLI’ for goods in classes 29, 31 and 32

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) of Council Regulation No 40/94 because the Board of Appeal misapplied the test of likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---