alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018152EN.01005402.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/54

---

Action brought on 5 March 2018 — Sona Nutrition v EUIPO — Solgar Holdings (SOLGAR Since 1947 MultiPlus WHOLEFOOD CONCENTRATE MULTIVITAMIN FORMULA)

(Case T-154/18)

(2018/C 152/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sona Nutrition Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Solgar Holdings, Inc. (Ronkonkoma, New York, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in colours green, light brown, beige, dark brown and golden brown, SOLGAR Since 1947 MultiPlus WHOLEFOOD CONCENTRATE MULTIVITAMIN FORMULA — Application for registration No 13 781 273

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2017 in Case R 1322/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and Solgar Holdings, Inc., if it should intervene in these proceedings, to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Solgar Holdings, Inc., if it should intervene in these proceedings, to bear the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation No 2017/1001; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation No 2017/1001;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 951 

Denouncing the wrongful and unjust seizure and confiscation of private property of Iranians both inside and outside of Iran, including United States 

citizens of Iranian descent, by the Government of Iran. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2016 

Mr. ROYCE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Denouncing the wrongful and unjust seizure and confiscation 

of private property of Iranians both inside and outside 

of Iran, including United States citizens of Iranian descent, by the Government of Iran. 

Whereas the Government of Iran came to power in 1979 and 

is ruled to this day by an autocratic government; 

Whereas victims of the Government of Iran included individuals persecuted or targeted for persecution based on their 

political beliefs and associations, as well as their religious, ethnic, and cultural identities; 

Whereas an instrumentality of state persecution included the 

wrongful and unjust seizure and confiscation of private 

property including real property, personal property, and 

financial assets; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 951 IH 

Whereas a great number of owners of such property fled for 

safety to the United States or Europe and are now citizens of those countries; 

Whereas the Government of Iran has transferred ownership 

of such confiscated property to government-affiliated 

foundations and related institutions; and 

Whereas the Government of Iran has shown no sign that it 

intends to return or compensate the rightful owners of 

said government’s wrongful property seizures: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) denounces the wrongful and unjust seizure 

3 and confiscation of private property of Iranians both 

4 inside and outside of Iran, including United States 

5 citizens of Iranian descent, by the Government of 

6 Iran; and 

7 (2) calls on the Government of Iran to provide 

8 fair, comprehensive, and nondiscriminatory restitu9 tion of or compensation for all such property wrong10 fully and unjustly seized and confiscated by the Gov11 ernment of Iran. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
January 5, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF EST ANISLADA RODRIGUEZ
NO. 14

- 16

- 00507

- CV

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on December 16, 2013. Having considered the
m otion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Terry Garcia

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2019122EN.01000501.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 December 2018 — Stichting Schoonzicht, other party to the proceedings: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-791/18)

(2019/C 122/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Stichting Schoonzicht

Other party to the proceedings: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Questions referred

| 1. | Do Articles 184 to 187 of the 2006 VAT Directive (1) preclude a national adjustment regime for capital goods which provides for an adjustment spread over a number of years, whereby in the year the goods enter into use — which year is moreover the first adjustment year — the total amount of the initial deduction for that capital good is adjusted (revised) in a single step, if, upon the entry into use thereof, it turns out that that initial deduction deviates from the deduction which the taxable person is entitled to apply on the basis of the actual use of the capital good? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do Articles 184 to 187 of the 2006 VAT Directive (1) preclude a national adjustment regime for capital goods which provides for an adjustment spread over a number of years, whereby in the year the goods enter into use — which year is moreover the first adjustment year — the total amount of the initial deduction for that capital good is adjusted (revised) in a single step, if, upon the entry into use thereof, it turns out that that initial deduction deviates from the deduction which the taxable person is entitled to apply on the basis of the actual use of the capital good?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:
  Must Article 189(b) or (c) of the 2006 VAT Directive be interpreted as meaning that the single adjustment of the initial deduction in the first year of the adjustment period referred to in Question 1 constitutes a measure which the Netherlands may adopt for the application of Article 187 of the 2006 VAT Directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:

Must Article 189(b) or (c) of the 2006 VAT Directive be interpreted as meaning that the single adjustment of the initial deduction in the first year of the adjustment period referred to in Question 1 constitutes a measure which the Netherlands may adopt for the application of Article 187 of the 2006 VAT Directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please see attached for HAI's comments regarding Docket No. 2002-12804 

Petition for Extension of Exemption: Exemption No. 6002H Petition of Helicopter 

Association International (HAI) and the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) 

requesting to extend Exemption No. 6002 for an additional two-year term, or for such 

longer term as the Administrator may deem appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         744,434
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,358,281
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,004,172
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     33,708,375
<ALLOWANCE>                                    511,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,307,340
<DEPOSITS>                                  42,306,752
<SHORT-TERM>                                   424,578
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            170,539
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,302
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,349,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              48,307,340
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,289,174
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              101,864
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               217,352
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,608,390
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,367,134
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,398,277
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,210,113
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  162,557
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,137,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (133)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (133)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   380,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.32
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,706,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   292,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                761,468
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               378,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   52,676
<RECOVERIES>                                    23,119
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              511,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        511,000
        

</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00393

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 Tarrant County, Tex as Trial Court No. 2018

- 000305

- 3

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M ICHAEL 

### A. F ARRIS AND 

### VOF P ROPERTIES 

### , LLC , Appellants

V



### .
L

ARRY 

### B AYS 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
We have considered the parties ’ “ Joint Motion t o Set Aside Judgment a nd

Remand t o Trial Court Pursuant t o S ettlement Agreement .” It is the court ’ s opinion

that the motion s hould be granted

. T herefore, w e rei nstate this appeal, set aside the

trial court ’s judgment and nunc pro tunc judgment without regard to the merits , and

remand this case to the trial court to render judgment in accordance with the partie s’

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)( 2)(B); Innovative Office Sy s., Inc. v. Johnson , 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995). Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : February 6, 2020
Animal and Plant
Health Inspection
Service

Wildlife Services

Office of the Deputy
Administrator

1400 Independence
Ave SW, Stop 3402
Washington, DC
20250-3402

Tel: 202-799-7095

USDA

MEER United States Department of Agriculture

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY October 12, 2016

To: All USDA APHIS Wildlife Services Employees
From: William H. Clay, Deputy Administrator

Subject: Notice Regarding APHIS-Wildlife Service’s Reliance on the 1994
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (“PEIS”) and 1995
Record of Decision.

In the 21 years since the PEIS Record of Decision was issued, APHIS-Wildlife
Services has initiated the phase out of any reliance on the 1994 PEIS. Today, most
of APHIS-Wildlife Services National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”)
documents are not tiered to the PEIS. No new APHIS-Wildlife Services NEPA
documents signed after the date of this Notice will be tiered to the 1994 PEIS. In the
future, APHIS-Wildlife Services intends to revise or redo all of its NEPA
documents that are currently tiered to the 1994 PEIS.
Call 1-866-4USDA-WS (1-866-487-3297) or visit aphis.usda.gov/dontfeedwildlife for more information.

CAUTION

Feeding may harm wildlife and result in 

damage to property and natural resources.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. APHIS-22-011-3 | Issued June 2022

ALL FEEDING IS PROHIBITED

Wildlife Services
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-80081,
333-33130, 333-47388, 333-70620, 333-98135 and 333-108345) of Silicon Storage Technology Inc. of our report dated March 17,
2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San
Jose, California
March 17, 2008

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, D. Geoffrey Shulman,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    May 10, 2006                      /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                           -----------------------
                                           D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (principal executive officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 60 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1035 

To extend authority relating to roving surveillance, access to business records, 

and individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers under the Foreign 

Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2015 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read the first time 

APRIL 22, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To extend authority relating to roving surveillance, access 

to business records, and individual terrorists as agents 

of foreign powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1035 PCS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSIONS OF AUTHORITY UNDER THE FOR2 EIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 

3 1978. 

4 (a) ROVING SURVEILLANCE AND ACCESS TO BUSI5 NESS RECORDS.—Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PA6 TRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 

7 (50 U.S.C. 1805 note) is amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 

8 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’. 

9 (b) INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS AGENTS OF FOR10 EIGN POWERS.—Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence 

11 Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 

12 1801 note) is amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 2015’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 60 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1035 

A BILL 

To extend authority relating to roving surveillance, 

for other purposes. eign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and ists as agents of foreign powers under the Foraccess to business records, and individual terrorAPRIL 22, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         122,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,908,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                   167,995
<INVENTORY>                                    637,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,624,340
<PP&E>                                       2,035,769
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,495,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,848,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,740,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    700,005
<COMMON>                                        44,356
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,363,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,848,389
<SALES>                                     11,181,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,181,809
<CGS>                                        6,250,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,250,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                63,299
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                493,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            493,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   493,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10



</TABLE>
CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, C. James Bess, President and Chief Executive Officer, and A. Lee Miller, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ C. JAMES BESS                                   | /s/ A. LEE MILLER                                              
|--------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|C. James Bess
President and
Chief Executive Officer | A. Lee Miller
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Position at July 31, 2000 and the Statement of Operations
for the three-month period ended July 31, 2000 and is in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                      46,828,040
<SECURITIES>                                 6,012,616
<RECEIVABLES>                                  538,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,527,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,915,374
<PP&E>                                      13,706,979
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,224,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,326,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,759,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,549,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,326,011
<SALES>                                     33,536,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,536,881
<CGS>                                        8,985,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,985,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,427,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,015,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,457,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,557,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,557,189
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18



</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

History of the National Wildlife

Research Center Story Map

Last Modified: 

Print
#### Macabio v. TIG Ins. Co.

19359

5/29/97

Affirmed