alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

GENAERA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Armstrong, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.           
|John L. Armstrong, Jr.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|November 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certifies that the Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period March 31, 2005, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:
May 5, 2005

|/s/DAN C. TUTCHERDan C. Tutcher President and Principal Executive
Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Checks Collected Worksheet

01. Account #: 0XPQPQ0024PQPSCRTPUBLICUSDA/0203 03. From:

02. To: USDA, APHIS

 P.O. Box 979043

 St. Louis, MO 63197-9000

04. Date 05. Applicant/ Name 06. Remitter Name 07.Check #

08. Check

Amount

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

Total: To tal:

RECEIVED

(Return copy to sender in item 3 above)

 AMOUNT RECEIVED BY (SIGNATURE)

 DATE TITLE

09. SENT BY (SIGNATURE)

10. PRINTED NAME

11. TITLE

13. ___ of ___

12. RESPONSIBLE EXPORT CERTIFICATION SPECIALIST (ECS)
Checks Collected Worksheet Instructions 

PPQ attempted to capture all the required information through the use of one 

worksheet instead of requiring state/county locations to fill out multiple documents 

each month. The worksheet contains all the information needed by PPQ to track and 

account for certificates issued and fees collected. 

Block 1 - Prefilled - Account Number 

Block 2 - Prefilled - Address to send original checks and worksheets 

Block 3 - Fill in the address of the state/county location 

Block 4 - Input the date the certificate was issued 

Block 5 - Input the name of the applicant organization/government entity 

 In many cases, the applicant and exporter are the same. Enter the name of 

the person who actually paid for the certificate, not necessarily the exporter 

listed on the certificate. 

Block 6 - Input the person that signed the check or money order 

Block 7 - Input the check or money order number 

Block 8 - Input the amount of the check collected 

Block 9 - Signature of the person sending in the worksheet 

Block 10 - Printed name of signer in block 9 

Block 11 - Title of person 

Block 12 - Name of responsible ECS 

Block 13 - To be completed if the worksheet requires multiple pages 

Received Block - To be completed by USDA
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. DONNA F. EDWARDS

                              of maryland

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, July 26, 2012

  Ms. EDWARDS. Mr. Speaker, I was absent from votes in the House 
Tuesday afternoon (July 24th), due to testifying before the Senate 
Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human 
Rights. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall votes 
502 (the motion on ordering the previous question on H. Res. 738) and 
503 (H. Res. 738, the rule providing for consideration of both H.R. 
4078 and H.R. 6082).

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>  


                              RONALD H. COLE
                            1120-B Elkton Drive
                   Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907-3568

November 8. 1995

R. Eugene Rider end
   Eva Forsberg-Rider
c/o Brown Disc Products Company
1120 B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs. CO 80907-3568

         Re: Release of 45,000 shares from Irrevocable Proxy

Dear Gene end Eva:

  This will confirm my agreement with you to the effect that the 45,000
shares to be sold by you in Rule 144 transactions within the immediate future
are, upon the sale of such shares, to be released from the provisions of that
certain IRREVOCABLE PROXY dated as Of September 7, 1995 previously granted by
you to the undersigned.

  Therefore, after such shares are sold, the Irrevocable Proxy will be
adjusted to cover the remaining 1,302,410 shares of common stock in BROWN DISC
PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. owned by you.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Ronald H. Cole
                                    --------------------
                                    Ronald H. Cole

Acknowledged:

/s/  R. E. Rider
-----------------------
R. Eugene Rider

/s/  Eva Forsberg-Rider
-----------------------
Eva Forsberg-Rider
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-49-2023]

On August 15, 2023, Millipore Corporation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 81D, in Jaffrey, New Hampshire.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 56794, August 21, 2023). On December 13, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: December 13, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-27743 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
H. Res. 859 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 13, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 5620) to amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the removal or demotion of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs based on performance or misconduct, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. After general debate the bill 

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill are waived. No amendment to 

the bill shall be in order except those printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
2 

•HRES 859 EH 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Bacchus, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), *249rendered October 10, 1989, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, sodomy in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, sexual abuse in the second degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court improperly admitted the testimony of the complainant’s mother as evidence of the complainant’s "prompt outcry”, and that the testimony of a medical expert was improperly admitted for the purpose of explaining the reactions of child victims to sexual abuse. However, since the defendant failed to raise an objection to the admission of this testimony at trial on the grounds he now advances on appeal, any errors of law with respect thereto are unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Osuna,*65 NY2d 822; *People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865; *People v Gomez,*112 AD2d 445).

The defendant similarly failed to object to the claimed errors in the prosecutor’s summation and in the court’s charge. Therefore, any errors of law with respect to those claims are also unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Nuccie,*57 NY2d 818; *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his convictions for sodomy in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child need not be dismissed because they were based upon the same act as the more serious charge of sodomy in the first degree. " '[Wjhere [a] verdict is comprised of inclusory concurrent counts a verdict of guilty on the greatest count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count’ ” *(People v Campbell,*86 AD2d 403, 405, quoting *People v Grier,*37 NY2d 847, 848). However, a crime will be considered a lesser included offense only when the greater crime theoretically could not be committed without the lesser offense also being committed *(see, People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61, 64; *People v Green,*56 NY2d 427, 430; *see also, People v Hayes,*43 AD2d 99, *affd*35 NY2d 907). The defendant was charged with sodomy in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree based upon his use of forcible compulsion, while the counts of sodomy in the second degree and sexual abuse in the second degree were based upon the complainant’s being under 14 years of age. The count of endangering the welfare of a child is based upon entirely distinct elements from the above crimes *(see,*Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). Each of these crimes involved distinct elements, and the defendant could theoretically have committed one without committing *250the others *(see, People v Cirina,*143 AD2d 763; *People v Saddlemire,*121 AD2d 791, 793). Therefore, dismissal of the lesser convictions is not required *(see, People v Bolton,*103 AD2d 806). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
October 29, 2015 

Dear Mr. Jonathan Wilhelm: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−2315). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/12/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
#### County of Kauai v. Scottsdale Co., Inc.

21262

1/27/99

Vacated & Remanded
# C_2018311EN.01001801.xml

| 3.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/18

---

Action brought on 16 July 2018 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg)

(Case T-445/18)

(2018/C 311/19)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: P. Lange, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Hamburg (Hamburg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Party applying for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Application for registration No 2 791 416

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 January 2018 in Case R 1270/2007-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Paragraph 15(2) of the German Law on trade marks; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Paragraph 15(2) of the German Law on trade marks;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Paragraph 15(3) of the German Law on trade marks; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Paragraph 15(3) of the German Law on trade marks;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 63 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, read in conjunction with Rule 20(7)(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, read in conjunction with Rule 20(7)(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6046

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JUAN PRATT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-123-3-MU, CA-97-28-3-MU) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan Pratt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Pratt waived the right to collaterally attack his conviction or sentence except on specifiedgrounds, and he fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. See Lockhart v. Fretwell , 506 U.S. 364 (1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pratt , Nos. CR-95-123-3-MU; CA-97-28-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5325]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    BILL PRESENTED TO THE PRESIDENT

  Karen L. Haas, Clerk of the House, reported that on July 25, 2012, 
she presented to the President of the United States, for his approval, 
the following bill.

       H.R. 2527. To require the Secretary of the Treasury to mint 
     coins in recognition and celebration of the National Baseball 
     Hall of Fame.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            EXHIBIT 11.1
                                        EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                    QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2001

                                      Three Months    Three Months     Six Months      Six Months
                                         Ended           Ended           Ended           Ended
                                     June 30, 2001   June 30, 2000   June 30, 2001   June 30, 2000
                                     --------------  --------------  --------------  --------------
<S>                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>

Net income                           $       75,715  $      101,633  $      176,134  $      202,026
                                     ==============  ==============  ==============  ==============
Average shares outstanding                  560,318         560,318         560,318         560,318

Basic earnings per share             $         0.14  $         0.18  $         0.31  $         0.36
                                     ==============  ==============  ==============  ==============
Average shares outstanding                  560,318         560,318         560,318         560,318
Dilutive average shares outstanding
   under warrants and options               263,800         263,800         263,800         263,800
Exercise price                       $        10.00  $        10.00  $        10.00  $        10.00
Assumed proceeds on exercise         $    2,638,000  $    2,638,000  $    2,638,000  $    2,638,000
Average market value                 $         9.89  $        10.94  $        10.08  $        10.76

Less:  Treasury stock purchased
   with assumed proceeds from
   exercise of warrants and options             N/A         241,133         261,706         245,167
Adjusted average shares-diluted             560,318         582,985         562,412         578,951
Diluted earnings per share           $         0.14  $         0.17  $         0.31  $         0.35
                                     ==============  ==============  ==============  ==============
</TABLE>

     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  values  are  derived from trades known to management.  Private sales may
occur  where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.


<PAGE>