alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01269-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS EZPAWN, L.P. D/B/A EZMONEY LOAN SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03373-A

ORDER

Appellee’s unopposed motion for leave to file supplemental brief is GRANTED. The 

supplemental brief, which was filed on February 20, 2013, is deemed timely filed.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2020019EN.01004003.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/40

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-345/19) (1)

(2020/C 19/47)

Language of the case: Germany

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.

---
# C_2019093EN.01006202.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/62

---

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2019 — Prigent v Commission

(Case T-436/18) (1)

((Action for annulment - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Refusal of the Commission to bring infringement proceedings - Act not open to challenge - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 93/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Claude Prigent (Caudan, France) (represented by: A. Bove, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 23 May 2018 not to take any further action on the applicant’s complaint seeking a declaration that the French authorities infringed Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ 2009 L 335, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Claude Prigent shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Claude Prigent shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.

---
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 21.1

                               NEXTHEALTH, INC.
                              Subsidiary Schedule



Subsidiaries                  State of Incorporation  Doing Business As
------------                  ----------------------  -----------------

Sierra Tucson, LLC                   Delaware         Sierra Tucson

Sierra Health-Styles, Inc.           Delaware         Miraval

Sierra Tucson Educational
Materials, Inc. (STEM)               Arizona

NextHealth Water Resources, Inc.     Arizona

Sierra Tucson AC, Inc. (STAC)        Arizona

Miraval Service Corporation, Inc.    Arizona

Onsite Workshops, Inc. (inactive)    Arizona

The NextHealth Institute, Inc.       Arizona
(inactive)

NextHealth.com, L.L.C. (inactive)    Delaware

                                      52
#### Camanga v. Tanaka

16380

10/12/94

Dismissed
State

# Birds

Flock Type

Species

Pathogenicity Confirmed 

by NVSL

IN Dubois 1

43,094

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/15/2016

H7N8 High Path

IN Dubois 1a

19,015

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

Dangerous Contact High 

Path

IN Dubois 2

37,798

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 3

28,751

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 4

12,392

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 5

22,227

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 5a

156,178

Commercial Table Egg Layer

Chicken

Dangerous Contact Low Path

IN Dubois 6

24,732

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

Presumptive H7 Low Path

IN Dubois 7

11,425

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 8

36,695

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 9

16,591

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

IN Dubois 10

5,325

Commercial Turkey Meat Bird

Turkey

1/17/2016

H7N8 Low Path

County

HPAI/LPAI Infected Premises 

(last updated 5/2/2016) 

(includes Dangerous Contact Premises)

 Last update 5/2/2016 1
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ MICHAEL L. BENNETT

Michael L. Bennett
    
    
    
    /s/ DANIEL D. GREENWELL

Daniel D. GreenwellPresident and Chairman of the Board
    
    
    
    Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerDirector (Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Dated: April 25, 2008
    
    
    
    Dated: April 25, 2008
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5292]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. KING of New York:
       H.R. 6195.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:
       The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, 
     Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for 
     the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; 
     but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform 
     throughout the United States.
```
# C_2010179EN.01000601.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 May 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)) — Data I/O GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover, formerly Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost

(Case C-370/08) (1)

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Chapter 84, Note 5(B) - Adapter containing a memory-chip and designed to provide the electrical connection between an automatic programming machine and electrical components to be programmed - Headings 8471, 8473 and 8536)

(2010/C 179/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Data I/O GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover, formerly Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Note 5(B) to Chapter 84 of the Combined Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004 (OJ 2004 L 327, p. 1) — Electrical adapter ensuring the transmission of data from a programming machine to the electronic components to be programmed and containing a memory chip ensuring the storage of the programming process — Possibility of classification under heading 8471 of the Combined Nomenclature

Operative part of the judgment

An adapter, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which performs the functions of the electrical connection between the programming machine and the components to be programmed and of the storage of the programming process, which can be retrieved later, fulfils the condition set out in Note 5(B)(c) to Chapter 84 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004 and must be classified under heading 8471 thereof as a ‘unit’ of an automatic data-processing machine, in so far as its main function is to carry out data-processing. Where that function is absent, such an adapter must be classified under heading 8473 of the Combined Nomenclature as a ‘part’ or ‘accessory’ of a machine, as the case may be, if it is either essential to the functioning of that machine or constitutes a part or device designed to adapt a machine for a particular operation or an element to perform a particular service relative to the main function of that machine, which it is for the referring court to determine. Where that adapter cannot be classified under either of the abovementioned headings, it must be considered to be an ‘electrical apparatus for making connections to or in electrical circuits’, and consequently to fall under heading 8536 of the Combined Nomenclature

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas M. Rettler, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the           Annual
Report) to which this statement is an exhibit fully complies           with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act           of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material           respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 14, 2005

| | /s/ William D. Gehl  
| | ---------------------
| | William D. Gehl      
| | /s/ Thomas M. Rettler
| | Thomas M. Rettler
NO. 07-02-0515 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D APRIL 1, 2003

______________________________ TERRY ANTHONY WILSON, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 18 1ST DISTR ICT COURT OF POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 45,476-B; HON. JOHN B. BOARD, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ABATEMENT AND REMAND

__________________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMP BELL, JJ. Terry An tho ny Wilso n (a ppe lla nt) a ppeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. The clerk’s and reporter’s records were filed on February 10, 2003. Thus, appellant’s brief was due on M arch 12, 2003. H owe ver, one wasnot filed on that date. By letter, this Court not ified appellant’s counsel of the expired deadline and directed him to respo nd to our letter by Monday, M arch 31, 2003, or the appeal would be abated2

to the trial court pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8. Tha t da te h as la pse d, a nd a ppe llant sti ll has yet to file a brief. Consequentl y, we abate this appeal an d rema nd th e cause to the 181 stDistrict Court of Potter County (t rial court) for furt her proceedi ngs. Upon rem and, the trial court sha ll imm ediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, con duct a hearing to determ ine the following: 1. w het her

app ellan t de sire s topro sec utetheapp eal; 2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, 3. whethe r appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to appe llate couns el’s failure to timely file an appellate brief. See Evi

tts v. Lucey

, 469 U.S. 38 7, 394, 105 S.Ct . 830, 834-35, 83 L.Ed.2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent d efe nda nt is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on th e first appeal as of right and that counsel m ust be available to ass ist in preparing and subm itting an appellate brief). We fur the r dir ect the tria l court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subj ects. Should the tria l court find that appellant desires to pursue this

app eal, is indig ent , an d ha s be en d enie d ef fec tiveass ista nceof coun sel, then
we further

direct the court to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the app eal. The nam e, address, phone num ber, telefax num ber, and state bar num ber of the new counsel who will repr esent appel lant on app eal mustalso be included in the court’s findings of fact and conc lusions of law. Furtherm ore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplem ental clerk’s record containing the findi ngs of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argum entpresented at the aforem entioned hearing. Additiona lly, the trial court shall ca use the suppl emental clerk’s3

record to b e file d w ith t he c lerk of t his cour

t on or b efo re M ay 1 , 20 03. Sh ould additional ti me be needed to perf orm these tasks, the trial court may requestsam e on or before May 1, 2003. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           MEASURES REFERRED

  The following bill was read the first and the second times by 
unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

       H.R. 4157. An act to prohibit the Secretary of Labor from 
     reissuing or issuing a rule substantially similar to a 
     certain proposed rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
     1938 relating to child labor; to the Committee on Health, 
     Education, Labor, and Pensions.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2021502EN.01000301.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt München III v Dubrovin & Tröger GbR — Aquatics

(Case C-373/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 132(1)(i) and (j) - Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest - Provision of children’s or young people’s education, school or university education - School or university education - Basic swimming tuition)

(2021/C 502/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt München III

Defendant: Dubrovin & Tröger GbR — Aquatics

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of ‘school or university education’, within the meaning of Article 132(1)(i) and (j) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, must be interpreted as not covering swimming tuition provided by a swimming school.

---

(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

---
18771

#### Yamada & Sons v. Argonaut Ins. Co.

April 9, 1997

Order No. 97-33

Affirmed
#### Charles S. WOODRUFF, Appellant, v. SCHERING CORPORATION and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Globe Indemnity Co., Appellees.

No. 20617.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1963.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1964.

Arthur Cobb, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.

Edward W. Gray, W. P. Macmurdo, J. H. Percy, Jr., of Percy, Macmurdo & Gray, Baton Rouge, La., for Sobering Corporation and Globe Indemnity Co.

F. W. Middleton, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Baton Rouge, La., for Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Before RIVES and CAMERON, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge,

*959PER curiam:.

The unsuccessful plaintiff, recognizing the adequacy of the record to support the jury verdict against him, seeks a reversal because of alleged erroneous instructions. We have carefully examined the Court’s instructions and find them free from prejudicial error.

After a hard fought trial, the jury, with ample evidence and the opportunity to observe the witnesses, resolved the issues of negligence in favor of defendant. Appellant’s contentions are without merit. The judgment is

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**— Certification of Chief Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Clarence W. Peckham, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SBS Technologies,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
May 14, 2004    /S/ Clarence W. PeckhamClarence W. Peckham*Chief Executive Officer*
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS DRAFT NOTICE NO. 17-16 

 

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants 

 Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

 Veterinary Services Leadership Team 

FROM: Byron E. Rippke, 

 Director 

SUBJECT: Issuance of a Conditional License for Canine Osteosarcoma Vaccine, 

Live Listeria Vector 

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has issued a conditional 

United States Veterinary Biological Product License to Antelope Valley Bios, Inc., 

Establishment No. 419, Lincoln, Nebraska, for the manufacture and distribution of 

Canine Osteosarcoma Vaccine, Live Listeria Vector. 

A veterinary biological product regulated under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act must be 

shown to be pure, safe, potent, and efficacious before a veterinary biological product 

license may be issued. The regulations in title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, part 102, 

regarding the licensing of veterinary biological products provide that a conditional 

veterinary biological product license may be issued to meet an emergency condition, 

limited market, local situation, or special circumstance. The special circumstance 

addressed here is the need for a biological intervention for canine osteosarcoma in order 

to afford veterinarians another post-surgical treatment option beyond traditional 

chemotherapeutic intervention. 

Conditionally licensed products are required to be pure and safe, and have a reasonable 

expectation of efficacy. This conditional license was issued on the basis that a 

reasonable expectation of efficacy was demonstrated during field trials conducted in 

dogs that had been clinically diagnosed with osteosarcoma and undergone surgical 

removal of the primary appendicular tumor. Dogs were then treated with carboplatin. 

Following radiographic confirmation of the absence of pulmonary metastasis, affected 

dogs received a 3-dose primary vaccination series with the canine osteosarcoma vaccine 

and then median survival time was compared to historical standards. The conditional 

license will expire one year from the date of the license. APHIS will evaluate the firm’s 

progress throughout the next year toward regular licensure in order to consider 

reissuance of the conditional license. 

Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection 

Service 

Veterinary Services 

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics 

1920 Dayton Avenue 

PO Box 844 

Ames, IA 50010 

(515) 337-6100
17335

#### AMFAC, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Inv. Co.; Waikiki Beachcomber Inv. Co. v. AMFAC, Inc.

April 17, 1997

Order No. 97-41

Vacated
# C_2019263EN.01004702.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2019 — Pielczyk v EUIPO — Thalgo TCH (DERMÆPIL SUGAR EPIL SYSTEM)

(Case T-398/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark DERMÆPIL sugar epil system - Earlier national figurative mark dermépil - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64 (2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Likelihood of confusion - Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of that regulation (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Comparison of the goods)

(2019/C 263/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Radoslaw Pielczyk (Klijndijk, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Kielar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and K. Kompari, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Thalgo TCH (Roquebrune-sur-Argens, France) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 April 2018 (Joined Cases R 979/2017-4 and R 1070/2017-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Thalgo TCH and Mr Pielczyk

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Radoslaw Pielczyk to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Radoslaw Pielczyk to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

---