VEOLI A ES TECHNICA L SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. RESPONSES T O TH E UNITE D STATES 

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENCY'S REQUEST T O PROVIDE 

INFORMATIO N PURSUAN T T O TH E CLEA N AIR AC T DATE D JANUAR Y 29, 2009 

Exhibit s C - G 
c 

VES 002291 
Evaluation of Metals, Particulate Matter 

and PCDD/PCDF Emissions for Fixed 

Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

June 2006 

ENSR Corporation 

September 2006 

Document No.: 10002-017 
Prepared for: 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Sauget, Illinois 

Evaluation of Metals, Particulate Matter 

and PCDD/PCDF Emissions for Fixed 

Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

June 2006 

Prepared By: Jeffrey T. Gorman, Project Manager 

Reviewed By: Craig R. Doolittle.rE, Manager, Air Measurements 

ENSR Corporation 

September 2006 

Document No.: 10002-017 
ENS R 

Contents 

1.6 Introduction .

 1 "1 

1.1 Program Summary • 1-1 

2.0 incinerator Process Description ... . 2-1 

2.1 Process Overview 2-1 

22. Waste Feed Systems [40 CFR §63.1207(f)(1)(i«)(D)(E) and (f)(1)(ii)(C)] 2-1 

2.3 Manufacturer, Make and Model of the Incinerator [40 CFR §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(A)j* 2-1 

2.4 Air Pollution Control Equipment [40 CFR §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(Q)] 2-2 

2.4.1 Lime System 2-2 

2.4.2 Spray Dry Absorber 2-3 

2.4.3 Fabric Filter 2-3 

2.4.4 Induced Draft Fan and Stack - 2-3 

3.0 Summary of Results .. .... . • 3- 1 

3.1 Introduction..... 3-1 

3.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 3-t 

3.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals and Particulate Matter 3-1 

3.4 Metals Sample Contamination 3-2 

4.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 4-1 

4.1 Sampling Procedures 4-1 

4.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 4-1 

4.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling •• 4-1 

4.1.3 Metals and Particulate Sampling 4-1 

4.2 Analytical Procedures 4-1 

4.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 4-1 

4.2.2 Melals Analyses • 4-2 

4.3 Process Operating Conditions 4-2 

5.0 Quality Assurance... . ...... 5-1 

5.1 Introduction 5-1 

5.1.1 Pre-Sampling Activities 5-1 

5.1.2 Equipment Calibration , 5-1 

5.1.3 Glassware Preparation 5-2 

CADocumenlsardSetling^««xx*i»ar*ljocal I September 2006 

Setdr^sXTemporaiy Internet Rles\0LK7O0nyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

VES 002301 
ENS R 

List of Appendices 

Appendix A Facility Operating Data 

Appendix B Reference Method Reid Data and Calculations 

Appendix C Reference Method Calibrations, Verifications, and Certifications 

Appendix D Stack Configuration, Sampling Port and Traverse Point Locations 

Appendix E Laboratory Data 

List of Tables 

Table 3-1 PCDD / PCDF Emission Results - TEQ Basis 3-3 

Table 3-2 Emission Results for LVM Metals - May 2006 3-4 

Table 3-3 Emission Results for LVM Metals - June 2006 -3-5 

Table 3-4 Emission Results for SVM Metals and Mercury 3-6 

Table 3-5 Summary of Target Metals 3-7 

Table 3-6 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - May 2006 3-8 

Table 3-7 Emission Results for Particulate Matter-June 2006 3-9 

C:\Documents and Sett'nasfvwoodiiiarrtLocat U September2006 

SetSngsYTernporaiy Intemet FBes\DUC7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Repoitdoc 

VES 
ENS R 

1.0 Introduction 

1.1 Program Summary 

ENSR was retained by Veolia ES Technical Solutions (Veolia), formerly Onyx Environmental 

Services to conduct stack gas emission sampling during the weeks of May 8,2006 and June 19, 

2006. The sampling was performed on the Fixed Hearth Hazardous Waste Incinerator Unit 3 at their 

facility in Sauget Illinois. The purpose of this Performance Test was to evaluate the performance of 

the incinerator relative to the emissions standards for existing incinerators found in 40 CFR Part 63, 

Subpart EEE (the HWC MACT regulations). To this end, the specific objectives of this Perfonnance 

Test were to demonstrate emissions of the following pollutants: 

• Mercury 

• Low Volatile Metals (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) 

• Semi-volatile Metals (lead and cadmium) 

• Dioxins and Furans 

• Particulate Matter 

The Performance Test included feeding certain types of wastes and materials into the incinerator, 

sampling and analyzing these feedstreams, monitoring certain process parameters while 

concurrently conducting emissions testing. 

The results from this testing indicate that emissions for the above pollutants met the emission 

standards for the HWC MACT regulations. A summary of the test results can be found in Section 3 

of this report. 

C:\Oocumenls and Settina^^woodvorcALocaJ 

SettngsNTemporaiy Internet Rles\QUC7C\0nyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

1-1 September2006 
ENS R 

2.0 Incinerator Process Description -

2.1 Process Overview 

Veolia operates 2 Fixed Hearth Dual Chambered Incinerators (Units 2 and 3) and one rotary kiln 

(Unit 4) at the Sauget IL facility. The two fixed hearth units are rated at 16 million Btu/hr each. 

Incineration Unit No. 3 is a mirror image of Unit No. 2. Both of these units have their own waste 

handling systems as described in the sections that follow. The only difference being Unit No. 2 is 

equipped with four (4) baghouse modules, while Unit No. 3 is equipped with three (3) baghouse 

modules. Unit 4 is rated at 50 million Btu/hr and is equipped with its own tank farm system, drum 

storage, bulk solids storage and feed systems. 

2.2 Waste Feed Systems [40 CFR §63.1207(f)(1)(»i)(DKE) and (f)(1)(H)(C)] 

Fixed hearth incinerator no. 3 is designed to receive containers, aqueous liquid wastes; organic 

liquid wastes fed through air-atomizing nozzles, specialty liquid feeds and direct inject liquids fed 

through the aqueous or organic liquid feed systems. This unit can receive any combination of 

wastes - liquid, semi-solid, or solid - with a heat value of up to 16 million Btu/hr. 

Each of the fixed hearth incinerators are supported by storage/blend tanks located in Tank Farm #1. 

Rates of feed are controlled at each incinerator. Segregated liquid wastes are stored until utilized in 

the waste blending facilities. At that time, liquids are delivered to the blending tanks where the daily 

liquid feed to the incinerator is formulated, tested, and released to the incinerator. Blending of 

stored liquid wastes to achieve optimum heating value and viscosity for incineration takes place in 

Tanks 2,4,6 & 8. Six additional tanks (10,20,30,40,50 & 60) are used to segregate different 

waste stream types for. blending of liquid feed to the incinerator. Several criteria are important in 

designing a blend from available wastes that have been segregated principally by physical and 

chemical properties. These include compatibility, proper range of heating value, and permit 

restrictions regarding elemental composition (based on emission Hmitations). 

In compliance with the Benzene NESHAP, all tanks are vented to individual carbon adsorption 

canisters for removal of organics before vapor is discharged to the atmosphere. Each carbon 

adsorber canister is essentially equivalent to a 55 gallon container or greater, if necessary. All tanks 

are equipped with conservation vents, in addition to the carbon canister adsorber. All tanks are 

grounded, and flame arrestors are installed between the carbon adsorbers and the tanks. 

2.3 Manufacturer, Make and Model of the Incinerator [40 CFR §63.1207(f)(1 )(iii)(A)] 

Incinerator unit no. 3 features a two-stage combustion process. Ignition of waste material takes 

place in the primary (lower) combustion chamber. A secondary (upper) combustion chamber serves 

as an "after-burner" for process gases. Ignition of the waste takes place at temperatures in excess 

of 1,600 degrees F. The secondary combustion chamber maintains a minimum temperature of 

1,800 degrees F. These temperatures are presented in current operating conditions. 

The Series 2 incinerator has a total of two burners, one bumer, a North American burner, rated at 

12.0 million Btu/hr., is used in the lower chamber to maintain temperatures. It will bum only natural 

gas or No. 2 fuel oil. A second bumer is mounted in the upper chamber; it too will be used to supply 

additional heat and will be fueled with natural gas or #2 fuel oil. This burner is a North American 

C:\Documents and Settings^wMdwartfLocal 

SeWtigstfemporary Internet RlesVOLKTCOnyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

2-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

Burner, rated at 6.0 million Btu/hr. Liquid or gaseous wastes are injected through separate feed 

nozzles as described in section 2.2, above. 

The primary and secondary chambers have an external diameter of 9 feet, and are 17.5 feet long. 

The interior walls of both chambers are lined with approximately 10 inches of brick refractory and 

insulation backing, making the internal operating diameter approximately 72". The cross^sectional 

area of the chambers is thus 40.3 square feet. Combustion air is controlled separately in the upper 

and lower chambers. 

Following ignition of the waste material under controlled or starved-air conditions in the lower 

chamber, off-gases travel through a refractory-lined flue gas passage into the upper chamber, which 

acts as an afterburner. Turbulence is achieved by the tangential introduction of air and additional 

fuel in the upper chamber. Gas temperatures are normally maintained at 1,800-2,200 degrees F in 

the upper chamber and 1500-1900 degrees F in the lower chamber, pursuant to current Illinois EPA 

permit operating conditions. 

Leaving the upper chamber, the hot gas stream travels through 28 feet of refractory-lined stack 

sections before reaching the start of the gas scrubbing system. The combined volume of the upper 

and lower chambers, the flue gas passage and the hot crossover section is approximately 1,567 

cubic feet. The total retention time of combustion gases within the system is approximately 5 

seconds. The incinerator is rated at 16 million Btu/hr., with a design unit heat release of 

approximately 10,000 Btu per cubic foot Maximum gas volume when firing a heat release of 16 

million Btu/hr. is about 15,000 acfm at 400 degrees F. 

2.4 Air Pollution Control Equipment [40 CFR §63.1207(f)(1 )(iii)(G)] 

The air pollution control system consists of a spray dryer absorber and fabric filter baghouse. The 

air pollution control system neutralizes acidic compounds and removes particulate from the exhaust 

gas. Two subsystems, the spray dryer absorber and the fabric filter, carry out the chemical 

neutralization and particulate removal functions, respectively. A third subsystem, the lime system, is 

used to prepare and provide lime slurry to the spray dryer absorber for use in the chemical 

neutralization process. The induced draft fan and stack provide the mechanical energy required to 

transport the flue gas through the interconnecting ductwork, to its eventual discharge point to 

atmosphere. 

2.4.1 Lime System 

The lime system prepares lime slurry for use in the chemical neutralization process in sufficient 

supply and concentration to maintain continuous flue gas treatment in the spray dryer absorber. 

The system has been designed for batch mixing to provide this service. 

Hydrated lime is stored in a storage bin above the lime preparation area. The storage bin is sized to 

hold enough hydrated lime to maintain several days of system operation atthe maximum 

combustion rate of the incinerator. Lime is discharged through the conical storage bin bottom. The 

flow ofthe material from the bin is aided by a vibrating live bottom," or bin activator. A variable 

speed rotary feeder is used to meter the hydrated lime in the proportions required for batch mixing 

lime slurry. The lime is mixed with water in a tank beneath the lime storage bin. The rotary feeder 

speed and the rate that water is added to the lime slurry tank are variable so that the desired 20% 

lime solids concentration can be achieved in the tank. The variable feed adjustments allow water 

and lime to be added to the lime slurry tank at a rate that will allow a batch mode of mixing. An 

agitator is provided in the slurry tank to mix the water and lime and to maintain the suspension of 

C:\Documents and SetlingsVwoodwanftLocal 

Set6ngs\Temporary Intemet RlesflOUCTCVOnyx 2006 Test 

Repondoc 

2-2 September 2006 
ENS R 

lime solids. The mixed lime slurry is pumped at a continuous rate of flow through a recirculation 

loop to the atomizer. 

2.4.2 Spray Dry Absorber 

Slurry flow to the spray dryer absorber is metered by a flow control valve to obtain the proper feed 

concentration to the spray dryer absorber atomizer. Automatic (or manual) adjustment to the flow is 

made as a function of the output from a hydrochloric acid (HCI) analyzer in the gas duct downstream 

of the Fabric filter. The amount of slurry metered is proportional to the amount of HCI monitored. 

The slurry passes through a stationary swirl-type liquid distributor into the atomizer wheel where 

induced centrifugal force from the rapidly spinning wheel discharges the slurry through the wheel 

nozzles at high velocity. The design of the atomizer wheel, its rate of spin, and the discharge 

velocity of the slurry, create a cloud of finely divided droplets around the periphery of the atomizer 

wheel. A feedback signal from the atomizer power transmitter provides verification that water flow to 

the atomizer increases or decreases in proportion to the spray dryer absorber outlet temperature. 

Flue gas enters from the bottom of the spray dryer absorber through a vertical, centrally located 

disperser. The disperser directs the flue gas through the zone filled by the atomized slurry cloud 

where the flue gas and slurry mix, and most of the absorption occurs. 

The spray dryer absorber features a two-point product discharge. A portion of the dried spent 

chemicals and ash settle to the bottom of the chamber. This material is discharged at the base of 

the powder discharge cone. It then passes through a lump breaker which reduces large 

agglomerations of material to a manageable size. Finally, it is discharged through a rotary valve to 

the conveying system. The remainder ofthe spent chemicals is carried from the module entrained in 

the flue gas. 

2.4.3 Fabric Filter 

Gas exhausted from the spray dryer absorber is distributed by manifold ducts to three fabric filter 

modules at Unit 3. Within each filter module, the gas is passed through Teflon-coated fiberglass 

cloth bags. The gas passes from the outside to the inside of the filter bags. Particulate, entrained in 

the gas stream, is mechanically deposited on the outside of the filter bags as the gas passes 

through the cloth. 

The fabric filter cleaning mechanism utilizes jets of air to clean the filter bags. Periodically, the 

cleaning sequence will be initiated. The sequence is either started at the end of a timed cycle, or 

when the differential pressure across the filter reaches a predetermined setpoint of approximately 

7.0" w.c. The controller then sequences to each row of filter bags in each module, releasing a burst 

of air opposite to the direction of gas flow. The quickly released burst of air dislodges dust cake on 

the exterior of each bag as it travels from the top to the bottom of the bags. Released from the bag, 

the dust cake falls by gravity into the hopper at the bottom of the module. 

The dust cleaned from the filter bags is removed at the base of the hopper through a rotary valve for 

discharge to the conveying system. Treated by the spray dryer absorber and filtered by the fabric 

filter, the cleaned flue gas exits the fabric filter modules to an outlet manifold for exhaust. 

2.4.4 Induced Draft Fan and Stack 

The induced draft fan and stack are located downstream of the fabric filter. Combustion gases are 

drawn through the system by a 75 hp induced draft (ID) fan, rated at 15,000 acfm at 400° F 

saturated, and 22" water column pressure. The induced draft fan provides the mechanism for 

C:\Documents and SetSngs^jwoodwaidMocal 

SettingsYTemporaiy Intemet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 20OB Test 

Reportdoc 

2-3 September 2006 
ENS R 

transporting the incinerator flue gas through the spray dryer absorber, Fabric filter, and all 

interconnecting ducts. The velocity of the gas within the ducting and treatment devices is regulated 

by the damper associated with the fan. Treated gasses exhausted from the induced draft fan to the 

atmosphere through a 90-ft. high stack. The stack diameter for Unit 3 is 39 inches I.D. The stack is 

equipped with instrument sampling ports and a sampling platform for emissions testing. Appendix D 

provides details on the design and sample port locations and configurations for Unit 3. 

C:\Docunents and SeBinas^woodwafd\Local 

SeOmgsVTemporary Intemet filesWUCTOQnyx 2006 Test 

Remtdoc 

2-4 September 2006 
3.0 Summary of Results 

ENS R 

3.1 Introduction 

This section summarizes the test program results. Appendix B presents copies of ENSR's field data 

and calculations. Emission data is summarized in this section and feed and process operating data 

are included in Appendix A. 

3.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 

Method 0023A required separate analysis of the front-half and back-half sample train fractions. 

Program samples were submitted to Atta Analytical Laboratories in El Dorado Hills, CA for all 

analysis of all target parameters. A summary of the PCDD/PCDF emission results on a TEQ basis 

for Unit 3 are included in Table 3-1. 

• The PCDD/PCDF emissions for Unit 3 (average emissions for runs 1,2 and 3 were 0.024 

ng/m3 @ 7% O2) are below the HWC MACT emission standard of 0.2 ng/m3 @ 7% Oz. 

3.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals and Particulate Matter 

A summary of the metals and particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 is included in Tables 3-2 

through 3-7. Tables 3-2 and 3-3 provide a detailed summary of the Low Volatile Metals (LVM) 

emissions from the May 2006 and June 2006 testing. A detailed summary of metals emissions 

categorized by Semi-volatile Metals (SVM) and mercury is provided in Table 3-4. Table 3-5 provides 

a summary of all six target metals. Tables 3-6 and 3-7 summarize the particulate matter emissions 

from the May 2006 and June 2006 testing. 

. The LVM metals emissions for Unit 3 from the May 2006 testing (average emissions for runs 1,2 

and 3 were 249 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for LVMs) were higher than the HWC MACT emission standards 

of 97 ug/m3; 

. The LVM metals emissions for Unit 3 from the June 2006 testing (average emissions for runs 1, 

2 and 3 were 7.61 ug/m3 @ 7% O2for LVMs) were lower than the HWC MACT emission 

standards of 97 ug/m3; 

. The SVM and mercury emissions for Unit 3 (average for runs 1,2 and 3 were 16.6 pg/m3 @ 7% 

02for SVMs and 61.5 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for mercury) were below the HWC MACT emission 

standards of and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% Oa) and 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 for SVMs and 

mercury respectively; 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 from the May 2006 testing (average emissions for 

runs 1,2 and 3 were 6.39 mg/m3 @ 7% 02) is below the HWC MACT emission standard of 34 

mg/m3 @ 7% 02; 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 from the June 2006 testing (average emissions for 

runs 1,2 and 3 were 2.66 mg/m3 @ 7% 02) is below the HWC MACT emission standard of 34 

mg/m3 @ 7% 02. 

C:\Documents and Settings^oodvrardiLocal 

Settings\.Temporary Intemet Rtes\OUC7C\Oyx2006 Test 

Reoort-doc 

3-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

3.4 Metals Sample Contamination 

During the May 2006 testing, high arsenic levels, which were inconsistent among the three runs, 

were detected in sample results from the Method 29 train. A detailed review was conducted by both 

ENSR and Veolia personnel to assess possible causes and/or sources of cross contamination. This 

review included: 

• Sample train clean-up and preparation procedures 

• Sample port access and preparation for sampling 

• Sampling anomalies (i.e., observations of filter, sample train and procedures) 

• Lab contamination or incorrect results (duplicate samples were analyzed at a separate 

laboratory) 

• Operating or equipment issues that could have caused non-representative particulate matter 

containing high arsenic to be collected in the sample train 

It was concluded that there was crossrcontamination of the sample train during sampling that was 

most likely caused by dislodgement and re-entrainment in the flue gas of scale that had built up on 

the inside of the stack sample port over time, causing a non-representative result. Also, during this 

review it was determined that the number of traverse points for the ports used for the dioxin and 

furan sampling was incorrect based on Method 1 criteria, although results were well within the 

MACT emission standards. 

As a result, Unit 3 was re-tested in June to further evaluate low volatile metal and dioxin and furan 

emissions performance. Ports were cleaned prior to testing and the correct number of traverse 

points was used forthe selected sampling locations. Dioxin and furan results were again well within 

the emission standard. Low volatile metal results were also well within the emission standard. 

C:\Oocuments and Settngs^woadoaroMocal 

SeWix}s\Ternporary Intemet Files\OLK7aOnyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-2 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-1 PCDD / PCDF Emission Results - TEQ Basis 

Run No. Run1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 19-JW1-06 20-JUT1-O6 2i-jun-o6 

Start Time 14:40 09:30 09:30 

StooTime 17:59 13:05 11:43 

Units 

Sample Volume dscf 128.363 129.710 126.379 

Sample Volume m

3 3.63 3.67 3.58 

Moisture Content %v/v 44.4 47.7 45.6 

02 Concentration %vyv(div) 10.00 8.20 9.60 

C02 Concentration %wMdrv) 7.40 7.60 7.40 

Isokinetics % 99 104 100 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,441 5,212 5,280 

PCDD/PCDF pg ng/m3 

pg ng/m3 

pg ng/m3 

Parameters TEF' TEQ TEQ TEQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.00 0.00 0.0E+00 3.44 9.4E-04 0.00 O.OE+00 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.50 17.0 2.3E-03 17.6 2.4E-03 16.7 2.3E-03 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 19.1 5.3E-04 16.8 4.6E-04 14.6 4.1 E-04 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 46.1 1.3E-03 34.7 9.4E-04 35.7 1.0E-03 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.10 37.0 1.0E-03 27.1 7.4E-04 26.3 7.3E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 190 5.2E-04 175 4.8E-04 156.0 4.4E-04 

OCDD 0.001 247 6.8E-05 ! 175 4.8E-05 151 4.2E-05 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.10 30 8.1 E-04 32.8 8.9E-04 31.8 8.9E-04 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 36 4.9E-04 41 5.6E-04 41 5.7E-04 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.50 65 9.0E-03 70 9.6E-03 76 1.1E-02 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 36 9.9E-04 33 9.0E-04 38 1.1E-03 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 32 8.8E-04 32 8.6E-04 34 9.4E-04 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 44 1.2E-03 42 1.1E-03 45 1.3E-03 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.10 10 2.8E-04 12 3.2E-04 11 3.1 E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 78 2.1 E-04 67 1.8E-04 71 2.0E-04 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 8 2.2E-05 5 1.4E-05 7 2.0E-05 

OCDF 0.001 I 20 5.6E-06 15 4.0E-06 13 3.7E-06 

Total TEQs (ng/m3) s 0.020 0.020 0.021 | 

Total TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02) zz 0.025 0.022 I 0.026 

% of Standard" = 12% 11% j 13% j 

a

 U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

6

 PCDD/PCDF Standard = 0.20 ng/dscm @ 7% O2 

C:\Documents and SetSr^wood*ard\Loca! 3-3 September 2006 

SettngsYTemporary internet FSe£JDLK7COnyx 2006 Test 

Reoortjdoc 

VES 00231 
Table 3-2 Emission Results lor LVM Metals - May 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 10-May-06 1O-May-06 11-May-06 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 1155 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters -

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Volume Metered dot 81.248 83.546 76.761 80.518 

Sample Volume dscf 79.598 84.056 76.269 79.974 

Moisture %v/v 43.0 43.6 44.6 43.7 

02 at Stack %dry 12.40 9.40 10.00 10.60 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381 371 371 375 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,576 5,691 5,088 5,451 

I Isokinetics % 109 101 102 104 

Arsenic (As) — LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 8.50 248 945 401 

Stack Cone. @ 7%02 ug/m3 6.14 126 557 230 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 7.88E-05 2.22E-03 8.34E-03 3.55E-03 

g/sec 9.92E-06 2.80E-04 1.05E-03 4.47E-04 

BervUium (Bel -- LVM 

Quantity Collected MS 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 ug/m3 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.06 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 9.27E-07 8.96E-07 8.82E-07 9.02E-07 

g/sec 1.17E-07 1.13E-07 1.11E-07 0.00 

Total Chromium TO) - LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 16.7 28.0 54.8 33.2 

I Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 12.1 14.2 32.3 19.5 

| Stack Emission Rate lb/hr 1.55E-04 2.51 E-04 4.83E-04 2.96E-04 

I g/sec 1.95E-05 3.16E-05 6.09E-05 0.00 

C:\Docurnents and Setfings\jwoodwardMjOCal 

SetSngsVremporaiy Internet RleslOUCZOOnyx 2006 Test 

Repottdoc 

3-4 
ENS R 

Table 3-3 Emission Results for LVM Metals - June 2008 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 19-Jun-06 2<KJun-06 21>Jun-06 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

1 Stop Time 17:29 12:29 12:44 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Volume Metered def 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Sample Volume dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Moisture %v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

Oz at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386 388 386 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

I Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

1 Arsenic (As) — LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 5.53 3.69 5.20 4.81 

Stack Cone. @ 7% Oz pg/m3 3.44 1.86 2.98 2.76 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 4.79E-05 3.14E-05 4.65E-05 4.19E-05 

g/sec 6.03E-06 3.95E-06 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) — LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 0.00 0.0870 0.00 0.0290 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 0.00 0.0439 0.00 0.0146 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.00E+00 7.39E-07 0.00E+00 2.46E-07 

g/sec 0.00E+00 9.32E-08 O.OOE+OO 3.11E-08 

Total Chromium (Cr) - LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 9.91 3.85 11.2 8.30 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 6.17 1.94 6.40 4.84 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 8.58E-05 3.27E-05 9.98E-05 7.28E-05 

g/sec 1.08E-05 4.12E-06 1.26E-05 9.17E-06 

C:\Document5 and Setbngs\jwoodwartfLocal 

SettngsWemporaiy Intemet FitesSOlK7CV3rryx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-5 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-4 Emission Results for SVM Metals and Mercury 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 10-May-os 10-May-06 11-May-06 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

SamDiine Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Volume Metered def 81.248 83.546 76.761 80.518 

Sample Volume dscf 79.598 84.056 76.269 79.974 

Moisture' %v/v 43.0 43.6 44.6 43.7 

02 at Stack %dry 12.40 9.40 10.00 10.60 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381 371 371 375 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,576 5,691 5,088 5,451 

Isokinetics % 109 101 102 104 

Cadmium (Cd) - SVM 

Quantity Collected ug 0.34 1.04 2.42 1.27 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 0.25 0.53 1.43 0.73 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.15E-06 9.31 E-06 2.14E-05 1.13E-05 

I g/sec 3.97E-07 1.17E-06 2.69E-06 0.00 

1 Lead(Pb)» SVM 

J Quantity Collected M9 21.2 19.6 37.9 26.2 

j Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 15.3 9.9 22.3 15.9 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.96E-04 1.76E-04 3.34E-04 2.35E-04 

g/sec 2.47E-05 2.21 E-05 4.21 E-05 2.97E-05 

Mercury (Ha) - VM 

Quantity Collected pg 97.3 121 89.4 .103 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 70.3 61.5 52.7 61.5 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 9.01 E-04 1.09E-03 7.88E-04 9.25E-04 

g/sec 1.14E-04 1.37E-04 9.93E-05 1.17E-04 

C.ADocumerfc and Setb'ng^\jwoodward\Local 

SetbngsVremporaiy Internet RIes\OLK7CV0nyx2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-6 September2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-5 Summary of Target Metals 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions - micrograms/m3 

May 2006 Test 

Metals 

As 

Be 

Cr 

Total LVM 

Run1 

6.14 

0.07 

12.05 

18.3 

Run 2 

126 

0.05 

14.2 

140 

Run 3 

557 

0.06 

32.3 

589 

Average 

230 

0.06 

19.5 

249 

June 2006 Test 

Metals 

As 

Be 

Cr 

Total LVM 

Run 1 

3.4 

0.00 

6.17 

9.61 

Run 2 

1.9 

0.04 

1.94 

3.85 

Run 3 

2.98 

0.00 

6.40 

9.38 

Average 

2.8 

0.01 

4.84 

7.61 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3 

Semi-Volatile IV etal Em ssions - micrograms/m3 

Metals 

Pb 

Cd 

Total SVM 

Run1 

15.3 

0.25 

15.6 

Run 2 

9.9 

0.53 

10.5 

Run 3 

22.3 

1.43 

23.8 

Average 

15.9 

0.73 

16.6 

SVM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3 

Mercury Emissions - micro zramsfm3 

Metals 1 Ha 

Runl 

70.3 

Run 2 

61.5 

Run 3 

52.7 

Average 

61.5 

1 Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 

C:\Documents and Settings*jwoodwar<flUcaI 3-7 September 2006 

SetfingsXTentporaiy Internet Rtes\QLK7O0nyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

VES 
ENS R 

Table 3-6 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - May 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 10-May-os 10-May-06 11-May-06 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

SamDlina Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Volume Metered del 81.991 84.128 81.699 82.606 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 79.526 83.462 80.402 81.130 

Moisture %v/v 44.4 44.8 44.1 44.4 

02 at Stack %dry 12.50 9.40 10.00 10.63 

CO2 at Stack %dry 6.40 6.80 7.00 6.73 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 376 366 364 369 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,468 5,483 5,287 5,413 

Isokinetics % 109 100 100 103 

Particulate Emission Results -

8 Front Half Rinse 9 0.0031 0.0066 0.0058 0.0052 

Particulate Filter 9 0.0030 0.0081 0.0071 0.0061 

Total Particulate mg 6.10 14.7 12.9 11.2 

PM Loading @ 7% Oa mg/dscm 4.46 7.51 7.21 6.39 

Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0012 0.0027 0.0025 0.0021 

Grain Loading @ 7% 02 

.gr/dscf 0.0019 0.0033 0.0031 0.0028 

a

 Particulate Matter Standard = 34 mg/dscm @ 7% Oz 

C:\Documents and SetSrtgs^woodwardMjoca! 

SeffitigsWernporaiy Intemet RlesNrXK7C\Qnyx 2006 Test 

Report-doc 

3-8 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-7 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - June 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date IWun-06 2O-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

Stop Time 17:29 12:29 12:44 AVGS 

Samoline Parameters -

Barometric Pressure in.Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Moisture %vA/ 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

O2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

C02 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386 388 386 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

Particulate Emission Results -

Front Half Rinse Q 0.0040 0.0028 0.0017 0.0 

Particulate Filter g 0.0022 0.0017 0.0016 0.0 

Total Particulate mg 6.20 4.46 3.25 4.64 

J PM Loading @7%02 mg/dscm 3.86 2.25 1.87 2.66 

1 Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0013 0.00O90 0.00066 0.0010 

I Grain Loading @7%02 gr/dscf 0.0017 0.0010 0.0008 0.0012 

* Particulate Matter Standard = 34 mg/dscm @ 7 % Qz 

C:\Documents and SeMngs\fwoodwafdlLocal 

SetfingsVTemporaiy Intemel ResCLKTOOnyx2006Tea 

Reportdoc 

3-9 September 2006 
4.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

ENS R 

4.1 Sampling Procedures 

Several different sampling and monitoring techniques were used to provide the required data to 

meet the goals of this test program. Three (3) runs each were conducted on Unit 3 for EPA Method 

0023A, EPA Method 29, and EPA Method 5. The sampling activitjes described below were 

conducted during all runs. All field activities were documented in accordance with EPA accepted 

procedures and copies of all field notes and data sheets are included in Appendix B of this report 

4.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 

Gas stream velocity and temperature were determined in conjunction with each manual sampling 

method. A type "S" pitot tube connected to an inclined water manometer was used to determine 

velocity head of the flue gas at each duct traverse point as specified in EPA Reference Method 2. 

The temperature profile of the flue gas at each duct traverse point was obtained by taking readings 

with a thermocouple and pyrometer concurrent with the velocity head measurements. Moisture 

content was determined as specified in EPA Method 4. Velocity and temperature measurement 

profiles were established prior to testing to aid in sample train set-up. Samples for the determination 

of the fixed gas composition were collected using the integrated bag technique detailed in EPA 

Reference Method 3. 

4.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling 

Sampling for dioxins and furans was completed in accordance with EPA Method 23A (40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A). Each sampling run was 192 minutes in duration covering 16 sampling points at 12 

minutes per point. 

4.1.3 Metals and Particulate Sampling 

The EPA Multiple Metals Train (EPA Method 29,40 CFR 60 Appendix A) was utilized during the 

testing program forthe collection ofthe following metals: arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, 

lead, and mercury. Prior to metals analyses the tared filter and front half acetone rinse were 

analyzed gravimetrically for particulate matter in accordance with EPA RM 5. Each run was 120 

minutes in duration covering 16 sampling points at 7.5 minutes per point. 

4.2 Analytical Procedures 

4.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 

PCDD/PCDF analyses were performed by Alta Analytical Laboratory, Inc. in El Dorado Hills, CA. 

Sample fractions were extracted, concentrated and analyzed by EPA Method 8290 (High 

Resolution Gas Chromatograph / High Resolution Mass Spectrophotometer (HRGC/HRMS)). The 

train fractions recovered for analysis of PCDDs/PCDFs include the front half rinse, the particulate 

filter, the back half rinse and the XAD resin trap. The analytical results for the front half and back 

half fractions were analyzed and reported separately. 

C:\Documents and Setings\woodvrar<?Local 

SetSngs\Tempotary Intemet Files\OLK7CNOnyx 2006 Test 

ReporLdoc 

4-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

4.2.2 Metals Analyses 

Metals analyses for the waste feed samples were completed using two separate procedures. Rrst 

samples were prepared and analyzed for arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and lead as 

specified in EPA Method 6020 (ICP-MS), SW846,3"1 Edition. Mercury was analyzed via method 

7471A. Metals analyses were performed by Maxxam Analytical Inc. of Burlington, Ontario 

(Canada). 

4.3 Process Operating Conditions 

Throughout the field program, detailed process information was collected continuously by the 

facility's process control computers and data acquisition system (DAS). Process data including 

minimum, maximum and average values for key process variables recorded during each test 

condition. In general, target-operating conditions specified were achieved. 

C:\Documenrs and Set6ngs\jwoodwai*LocaI 

SetfingsvTemporary Intemet F9esVOLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

4-2 September 2006 
ENS R 

5.0 Quality Assurance 

5.1 Introduction 

This section presents the results of all QA/QC measures implemented during the field sampling 

program and all phases of subsequent analysis. Data generated for the program are judged to be 

valid as overall accuracy and precision results are consistent with general objectives. Analytical 

QA/QC data are presented to support all sample results used for determining compliance with 

performance criteria or emission standards. Throughout the overall program, all sampling was 

performed using sampling protocols described herein and approved by USEPA and the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

5.1.1 Pre-Sampling Activities 

Pre-sampling activities included equipment calibration, sample media preparation, cleaning of 

sample train glassware, preparation of computer-generated sample labels and other miscellaneous 

tasks. Each of these activities are described or referenced in the following subsections. Other presampling activities included such details as team meetings, equipment packing and shipment, 

equipment setup, and finalization of all details leading up to the coordinated initiation of the sampling 

program. 

5.1.2 Equipment Calibration 

A most important aspect of pre-sampling preparations was the inspection and calibration of all 

equipment used for the field effort. Equipment was inspected for proper operation and durability 

prior to calibration. Calibration of equipment was conducted in accordance with the procedures 

outlined in the EPA document entitled "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement 

Systems; Volume III—Stationary Source Specific Methods" (EPA-600/4-77-027b). Equipment 

calibration was performed in accordance with EPA guidelines and/or manufacturer's 

recommendations. Copies of theses calibrations are presented in Appendix C. Examples of field 

equipment used and typical calibration requirements follows: 

• PROBE NOZZLES (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pg. 19) - measurements of the nozzle ID (to 

the nearest 0.001 -in.) along three different diameters with a micrometer. Difference between 

the high and low values should not exceed 0.004 in. Post-test checks - inspect for damage. 

• PITOT TUBES (QA Handbook Section 3.1.2, pp. 1-13) - measured for appropriate spacing and 

dimensions or calibrate in a wind tunnel. Rejection criteria given on the calibration sheet 

Post-test checks - inspect for damage. 

• THERMOCOUPLES (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 15-18) - verify against a mercury-in-glass 

thermometer at two or more points including the anticipated measurement range. 

Acceptance limits - impinger ±2°F; DGM ±5.4°F; stack ±1.5 percent of stack temperature. 

• DRY GAS METERS (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 1-12)- calibrate against a wet test meter. 

Acceptance criteria - pretest Yi = Y ± 0.2; post test Y = ± 0.05 Yi. 

• FIELD BAROMETERS (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 18-19) - compare against a mercuryin-glass barometer or use Airport Station BP and correct for elevation. Acceptance criteria -

± 0.02 in. Hg; post-test checks - same. 

C:\Documents and SeOingsVwoodwanHLocal 

Settings\Temporary Internet ReslOLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

5-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

5.1.3 Glassware Preparation 

Sample train glassware and sample containers required specialized pre-cleaning to avoid 

contamination of the sample from the collection container or devices. Cleaning/storage procedures 

for sample train glassware are summarized below. Note that all bottle caps are fitted with Teflon 

liners, which were cleaned in the same manner as the bottles themselves. Sample containers used 

for waste feed streams are purchased pre-cleaned and sealed to specified EPA protocols. 

• EP A METHOD 0010 / 0023A GLASSWARE AND CONTAINERS (PCDDS/PCDFS) - washed with 

soap and water, rinsed three times with deionized (Dl) water, baked at 400°C for 2-hours, 

rinsed three times with pesticide grade methylene chloride, rinsed three times with pesticide 

grade toluene and air dry. 

• EP A METHOD 5729/0060 GLASSWARE AND CONTAINERS (METALS AND PARTICULATE MATTER) 

- washed with soap and water, rinsed with hot tap water and rinsed three times with reagent 

water. The glassware was soaked in a 10% nitric acid solution for a minimum of 4-hours, . 

rinsed three times with reagent water, rinsed a final time with acetone and air-dried. All 

glassware openings where contamination can occur are covered with Parafilm until the 

sampling train was assembled prior to sampling. 

5.1.3.1 Sample Media Preparation 

All reagents were checked in accordance with ENSR's existing QC Program to minimize the 

probability of using contaminated solvents. This included the use of the proper grade 

reagents/solvents as specified in the test method, selection of reagents from the same lot and 

collection and analysis of the appropriate blanks. Sampling media was procured and prepared in 

accordance with the appropriate test methods as described below: 

• XAD resin used in the Method 0023A train was purchased new and packed in specially 

designed sorbent traps. All glass cleaning and sorbent packing procedures followed the 

protocols specified in EPA Method 0023A. 

• Quartz filters used in the Method 5/ 29 / 0060 sampling train were supplied by Maxxam 

Analytics, Inc. who pre-screen filters for metals content. 

C:\Documents and SettirxjsVwoooVarALocal 

SetSngsYTemporary intemet RlesJQUCTOOnyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

5-2 September2006 
ENS R 

Appendix A 

Facility Operating Data 

September2006 

S:VJOa2006\Onyx\PeribrmanceTest\BeportV^ 

Test Reportdoc 

VES 00232 
Unit #3 

Run#l 

Date: 05/10/06 

Test Time: 09:47 to 13:51 

Run Length: 199 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 6820 0.5 0.3 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.33 0.05 2.5 1 5 

{Chlorine Spike) 500 85.5 0.1 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.05 2.5 1 5 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 23.4 0.13 2.5 1 1.3 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 81.8 0.21 20.1 1 &6 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 66.4 0.13 630000 208 6 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 96.3 0.13 2.5 1 5 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 600 2.5 1 5 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

PM PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

Ilium Chromium (Mvr) (MMBtu/hr; (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 2.5 982 6.70 4.91 2.95 0.000128 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1715 0.86 8.58 5.66 0.000086 0.00 

0.1 2.5 117 0.06 100.04 0.12 0.000015 0.00 

0.1 2.5 458 0.23 2.29 0.46 0.000023 0.00 

0.1 180000 251 0.13 1.26 58.73 Q.000033 0.00 

0.29 26.1 619 0.31 3.10 506.34 0.000130 0.01 

0.1 2.5 92 0.05 0.46 61.09 0.000012 57.96 

0.1 2.5 138 0.07 87.63 132.89 0.000018 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1.35 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000810 0.00 

4373 8.39 208.26 76854 0.00125 57.98 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 45.18 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 

0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 

0.02 0.02 0.00 45.20 
Unit #3 

Run #2 

Date: 05/10/06 

Test Time: 14:51 to 18:17 

Run Length: 206 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 6720 0.56 0.28 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.32 0.05 2.5 1 5 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 85.5 0.1 0.13 2.5 

"

 1 5 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.05 2.5 1 5 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 23.4 0.13 2.5 1 2.6 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 82 0.19 19.6 1 9.5 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 66.4 0.13 630000 221 1.6 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 96.3 0.13 2.5 1 5 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 600 2.5 1 5 

Totals 
PPM PPM 

Beryllium Chromium 

Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (fo/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (lb/hr) 

0.1 2.5 992 6.67 5.56 2.78 0.000129 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1681 0.84 8.41 5.38 0.000084 0.00 

0.1 2.5 100 0.05 85.50 0.10 0.000013 0.00 

0.1 2.5 461 0.23 2.31 0.46 0.000023 0.00 

0.1 180000 255 0.13 1.28 59.67 0.000033 0.00 

0.43 28.1 719 0.36 3.60 589.58 0.000137 .0.01 

0.1 2.5 108 0.05 0.54 71.71 0.000014 68.04 

0.1 2.5 161 0.08 102.24 155.04 0.000021 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1.58 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000948 0.00 

4479 8.41 209.42 884.72 0.00140 68.06 

VES 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (IWhr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 45.90 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 

0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

o.o o 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.03 0.02 0.00 45.93 
Unit #3 

Run #3 

Date: 05/11/06 

Test Time: 11:25 to 14:48 

Run Length: 203 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 7630 0.66 0.28 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.31 0.05 2.5 1 5 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 85.5 0.1 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.05 2.5 1 5 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 23.4 0.13 2.5 1 2 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 82.6 0.35 36.8 1 115 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 66.4 0.13 630000 283 9.1 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.'5 96.3 0.13 150 1 5 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 600 2.5 1 5 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

3M PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

Bum Chromium (IWhr) (MMBtu/hr] (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 2.5 1000 7.63 6.60 2.80 0.000130 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1931 0.97 9.66 5.99 0.000097 0.00 

0.1 2.5 92 0.05 78.66 0.09 0.000012 0.00 

0.1 2.5 448 0.22 2.24 0.45 0.000022 0.00 

0.1- 180000 245 0.12 1.23 57.33 0.000032 0.00 

0.9 26.3 723 0.36 3.62 597.20 0.000253 0.03 

0.1 1.3 106 0.05 0.53 70.38 0.000014 66.78 

0.1 2.5 158 0.08 100.33 1152.15 0.000021 0.02 

0.1 2.5 1.55 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000930 0.00 

4705 9.4B 202.86 886.39 0.00151 66.84 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (IWhr) 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 44.10 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 

0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.03 0.03 0.00 44.13 
Unit #3 

Run#1 

Date: 06/19/06 

Test Time: 14:40 to 18:05 

Run Length: 205 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 9930 3.2 1.5 0.413 18.8 1.98 2.5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.2 0.0202 157 0.0372 0.272 

(Chlorine Spike) 3170 85.5 0.1 0.011 0.1 0.02 02. 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.00035 1.38 0.0052 12.1 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 25.9 0.002 800 970 880 

PCC Solid Charges eao 0.6 70.6 0.025 12.93 0.30 6.73 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 65.6 0.02 630000 27 25 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 97.4 0.02 170 5 25 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 646 0.1 0.02 0.2 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

JPM PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

/Ilium Chromium (Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 13.3 1110 11.02 35.52 16.65 0.000458 0.02 

0.001 0.462 1896 0.95 9.48 3.79 0.000038 0.00 

0.05 0.04 95 0.30 81.23 0.10 0.000001 0.00 

0.01 0.0121 569 058 2.85 0.57 0.000000 0.00 

960 180000 251 0.13 1.26 65.01 0.000001 050 

0.37 157.81 798 0.70 4.71 563.74 0.000020 0.01 

4.8 2 119 0.06 0.60 78.06 0.000002 74.97 

2.5 2 179 0.09 113.67 174.35 0.000004 0.03 

0.05 0.04 1.75 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.001131 0.00 

5019 13.53 249.30 902.27 0.00166 75.24 

VES 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (lb/hr) (IWhr) 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

0.24 0.22 0.24 45.18 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.13 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.25 0.24 0.24 45.32 
Unit #3 

Run #2 

Date: 06/20/06 

Test Time: 09:30 to 13:05 

Run Length: 215 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 9000 2.3 4.9 0.413 4 0.35 2.5 

PCC Low Btu 

(Chlorine Spike) 

500 

3170 

0.5 

85.5 

0.2 

0.1 

0.00192 

0.014 

0.04 

0.1 

0.0034 

0.02 

0.253 

0.2 

PCC Sp Fdr 

(Chromium Spike) 

500 

500 

0.5 

0.5 

0.1 

25.9 

0.0002 

0.002 

0.0914 

100 

0.002 

20 

0.186 

200 

PCC Solid Charges 

(Lead Spike) 

(Chlorine Spike) 

(Mercury Spike) 

824 

500 

500 

500 

0.6 

0.5 

63.5 

0.5 

69.9 

65.6 

97.4 

0.1 

0.038 

0.02 

0.02 

646 

16.45 

630000 

42 

0.1 

0.37 

32 

5 

0.02 

6.25 

25 

25 

0.2 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

PPM PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

Beryllium Chromium (Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (IWhr) (Ib/hr) (IWhr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 13 1126 10.13 25.90 55.17 0.000465 0.00 

0.001 0.0579 1959 0.98 9.80 3.92 0.000004 0.00 

0.05 0.046 102 0.32 87.21 0.10 0.000001 0.00 

0.001 0.0116 543 0.27 2.72 0.54 0.000000 0.00 

50 180000 250 0.13 1.25 64.75 0.000001 0.03 

0.31 11.88 805 0.66 4.96 563.01 0.000030 0.01 

7.8 2 117 0.06 0.59 76.75 0.000002 7371 

2.5 2 176 ' 0.09 111.76 171.42 0.000004 0.01 

0.05 0.04 1.72 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.001111 0.00 

5080 12.64 244.18 935.67 0.00162 73.76 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.01. 0.05 0.01 45.00 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.01 0.07 0.01 45.02 
Unit #3 

Run #3 

Date: 06/21/06 

Test Time: 09:30 to 13:19 

Run Length: 229 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 10220 3.1 0.4 0.679 3.85 0.83 6.77 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.2 0.00184 0.04 0.0054 0.257 

(Chlorine Spike) 3170 85.5 0.1 0.0045 0.1 0.02 0.2 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.0002 0.0432 0.002 0.0709 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 25.9 0.002 100 20 200 

PCC Solid Charges 793 0.5 70.8 0.157 18.46 0.44 5.76 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 65.6 0.02 630000 42 25 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 97.4 0.02 18 5 25 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 646 0.1 0.02 02. 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

PPM PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

Beryllium Chromium (Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 5.74 1079 11.03 33.45 4.32 0.000733 0.00 

0.001 0.0586 2039 1.02 10.20 4.08 0.000004 0.00 

0.05 0.04 96 0.30 62.08 0.10 0.000000 0.00 

0.001 0.0408 547 057 2.73 0.55 0.000000 0.00 

50 180000 249 0.12 1.25 64.49 0.000000 0.02 

0.35 12.47 815 0:65 4.31 577.29 0.000128 0.02 

8.1 2 119 0.06 0.60 78.06 0.000002 74.97 

2.5 2 178 0.09 113.03 173.37 0.000004 0.00 

0.05 0.04 1.74 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.001124 0.00 

5124 13.55 247.65 902.25 0.00200 75.02 

VES 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.05 0.01 44.82 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.01 0.07 0.01 44.84 
Unit 3 Operating.Parameters 

June, 2006 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

Baghouse Inlet Temp. (Deg F) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

420 421 421 420 

PCC Temp. (Deg F) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

1735 1725 1741 1734 

SCC Temp. (Deg F) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

1845 1850 1851 1849 

Stackflow (ACFM) 

(Ave. of max. HRA's of each test run) 

14888 15349 15267 15168 

Pumpable Waste Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of max. HRA's of each test run) 

(Includes average spiked liquids flows) 

4147 

346 

4161 

352 

4172 

345 

4160 

na 

Total Waste Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of max. HRA's ot each test run) 

(Includes average spiked liquids flows) 

5273 

346 

5367 

352 

5391 

345 

5344 

na 

Mercury Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

0.0017 0.0016 0.0020 0.0018 

Ash Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

902 936 902 913 

LVM Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

46 45 45 45 

SVM Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

75' 74 75 75 

Chlorine Feed (Lb/hr) 249 244 248 247 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

VES 
Unit 3 Operating Parameters 

May, 2006 

Run 1 

420 

1713 

1845 

14873 

3718 

368 

4717 

368 

0.0013 

768 

45 

58 

208 

Run 2 

420 

1715 

1845 

15428 

3683 

355 

4862 

355 

0.0014 

885 

46 

68 

209 

Run 3 

420 

1712 

1846 

14468 

3800 

337 

4793 

337 

0.0015 

886 

44 

67 

203 

Average 

420 

1713 

1845 

14923 

3734 

na 

4791 

na 

0.0014 

846 

45 

64 

207 
ENS R 

Appendix B 

Reference Method Field Data and Calculations 

September2006 

S*_JO^00aOny^ ^ 

Test Report Joe 

VES 0023 
M a y 200 6 Tes t 

VES 0023' 
Particulat e Matte r Dat a 

VES 0023' 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

1 Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 10-May-06 10-May06 11-May-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.412 0.440 0.440 0.431 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 81.991 84.128 81.699 82.606 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 85.9 72.5 77.1 78.5 

Avg Delta H inHzO 1.57 1.73 1.56 1.62 

Avg Delta H in.Hg 0.1158 0.1274 0.1146 0.1193 

DGM Calibration Factor -1.0270 1.0270 1.O270 1.0270 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 79.526 83.462 80.402 81.130 

Total Water Collected mL 1344.7 1438.7 1343.8 1375.7 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 63.403 67.835 63.360 64.866 

1 Moisture (measured) %v/v 44.4 44.8 44.1 44.4 

Moisture (@ saturation) %v/v 102.8 103.0 103.0 102.9 

Dry Mole Fraction. 100-%M - 0.5564 0.5516 0.5593 0.5558 

C02 at Stack %dty 6.40 6.80 7.00 6.73 

02 at Stack %dry 12.50 9.40 10.00 10.63 

CO + N2 %dry 81.10 83.80 83.00 82.63 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.52 29.46 29.52 29.50 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/ltwnole 24.41 24.32 24.44 24.39 

Excess Air at Stack % 140.3 73.9 83.9 99.4 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in HzO 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.17 

Stack Pressure in.Hg 29.12 29.04 29.06 29.07 

Avg. Stack Temp. "F 376.4 3665 364.3 369.0 I 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P -

0.4125 0.4145 6.3946 0.4072 

SDE Average - . 

11.931 11.915 11.330 11.725 

Pitot Coefficient -

0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,928 1,932 1,832 1,897 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,998 16,027 15,198 15,741 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,827 9,940 9.453 9,740 

Stack Fiowrate dscfm 5,468 5,483 5,287 5,413 

isokinetics % 109 100 100 103 

Meter Box No. _ 80610 80610 80610 — 

Delta H@ inHjiO 1.803 1.803 1.803 - • 

Field QA Yqc -

1.0465 1.0591 1.0375 1.0477 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.90% 3.13% 1.02% 2.02% 
Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

Runl 

r 

Ran 2 Run 3 

PT Delta P SORT DGM DGM Delta H STACK j Delta P SORT DGM DQM Delia H STACK Delta P SORT DGM DQM Delta H STACK 

Delia P IN OUT TEMP Delia P IN OUT TEMP Delta P IN OUT TEMP 

a1 0.15 0.3873 70 70 1.38 346 0.18 0.4243 76 75 1.90 370 0.13 0.3606 70 69 1.30 350 

a2 0.20 0.4472 77 72 1.81 378 0.20 0.4472 75 74 1.99 370 0.16 0.4000 74 69 1.58 364 

B3 0.20 0.4472 82 74 1.81 378 0.21 0.4583 76 73 2.09 368 0.17 0.4123 77 70 1.68 369 

a4 0.21 0.4583 85 75 1.89 388 0.20 0.4472 77 72 1.99 366 0.19 0.4359 80 71 1.88 369 

aS 0.20 0.4472 86 80 1.82 390 0.19 0.4359 75 71 1.90 363 0.17 0.4123 81 72 1.70 368 

a6 0.18 0.4243 90 82 1.66 374 0.19 0.4359 71 69 1.90 364 0.16 0.4000 82 73 1.60 362 

a7 0.15 0.3873 92 82 1.38 375 0.15 0.3873 76 69 1.50 362 0.16 0.4000 83 74 1.60 364 

a« 0.11 0.3317 93 83 1.02 374 0.11 0.3317 76 69 1.10 363 0.14 0.3742 83 75 1.40 365 

b1 0.16 0.4000 86 84 1.48 374 0.12 0.3464 69 68 1.20 365 0.15 0.3873 75 74 1.50 363 

b2 0.18 0.4243 93 85 1.67 377 0.16 0.4000 74 68 1.60 365 0.17 0.4123 80 75 1.70 366 

b3 0.18 0.4243 94 86 1.67 378 0.18 0.4243 75 68 1.80 365 0.17 0.4123 83 75 1.70 366 

b4 0.16 0.4000 96 88 1.48 379 0.18 0.4243 76 69 1.80 366 0.17 0.4123 84 76 1.70 365 

bS 0.18 0.4243 96 88 1.66 379 0.18 0.4243 75 68 1.80 364 0.16 0.4000 84 76 1.60 365 

b6 0.19 0.4359 96 88 1.75 378 0.20 0.4472 76 68 1.98 372 0.15 0.3873 85 77 1.50 368 

b7 0.15 0.3873 97 90 1.39 378 0.18 0.4243 77 68 1.78 372 0.13 0.3606 82 77 1.30 364 

b8 0.14 0.3742 98 91 1.32 377 0.14 0.3742 78 68 1.40 364 0.12 0.3464 84 77 1.20' 361 

^•^lil:! i-il iiii ?:;;;;! 1 

'>• '• ' 

AVG 0.17 0.4125 85.9 -•: :• 1.57 376 0.17 0.4145 72.5 1.73 366 0.16 0.3946 77 A 1.56 364 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

ro 

oo 

-r> 

r n 
ENS MtCO M EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPUNG • FIELD DATA SHEET 

SAMPLING TRAIN: M5/ Paniculate 

PLANT: ONYX Environmental 

DATE: O5-.0-<?fe 

TEST LOCATION: Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

RUN NUMBER: Rl 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 39" 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

I k . 

IPQ8 

J15J. 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/•): 

Probe/Pilot Number: 

.Pilot Coefflcient: 

Filter Box No.: 

.Meter Box Number: 

.Orifice Coefficient fY): 

Delta M@: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAO Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet 10: 

_22 _ 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. ' 

LEAK CHECKS: 

)V In. CFM 

CFM ' 

CFM ' 

In. 

In. 

• 006 

• 0P3 

OM 

ma [MJfl 

L&2JL 

INIT. PITOT 

" FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT Initial: 

3 1' 

FILTER DATA' 

* *?T<-3 0R8AT Final: 

100 

100 

Final Vol. 

511 

10 

I T T 

ORSAT DATA 

ffrV Ttftili 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

INET GAIN: |^<j*j .'1 ml. 

SAMP16 

•v poitfr,;. 

;OM»P. tun 

.. oRirw . .QAS.M«TSR 

i.i*-'-**it:.i'>.iJr'. u-iuV 

SAMP16 TEMPERATURE RE#,OINQS,*F 

•v poitfr,;. 

;OM»P. tun 

.. oRirw . .QAS.M«TSR 

i.i*-'-**it:.i'>.iJr'. u-iuV 

.'••;:$TACK *:,.'• ;, PROBE?.'.: 

.V.:.«h': •..eA?,' v&air&itt 

, M 0 (.^ »<6<3.»rt| r K & c/ *( 

2....- 7 5 l.ftl mo. b 37& S3 2SI 

!> IT |.8\ Hlfe. 1 sin a n s i H 

- J i 1.94 39. & a s i l<i<i «< 

5 • It) \.M 426.9 3% 0<iU 3fc& f 116 7 fftW * 

Si* •IS \.UL 3W 2 HP, Ml 368 <x> 

7 H9 f.3ft X15 a5<< -XH$ s

3 3 72 s 

5P,5 •u 31H 2 53 156 s7 31ft W 

& 1 to • It ( J14 a 53 iWS s

? 2 54 «f (UJ Pin cAcJjf 

W,5 . -ttt H51 .q 2SV> K 

3 Ti .1* 1 -Cj i5i. a ? a s . S 

sa.5 ,t(p I.HI? ^ XSI ?3 a<fo U w 

5 • ie U b 3-1« 151 SH aft<i % «fl 

L ITS •»! 1.15 375 a Sl -^50 s'S .9* */ 

7 |o5 . i i v i e 6 J7« J5I a m U 1 ° \.33 SSVft 317 Hi H A U ni 

13.1) 

nmum MM.m. -.MI.. . •••i l . « l l »|,r J | llULl | j | , j 

< 

m 

w 

o 

o 

ro 

00 

4^ 
ENSFC! AECOM 

£'. -',3 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLINQ - FIELD DATA 8HEET 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 5/10/2006 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: R2 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIMfc: 

STOP TIME: 

M5 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

Onyx STATIC PRESSURE (•>-): 

Probe/Wtot Number: 

Unit #3 Print Coefficient; 

Filter Box No,: 

39 Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient <V): 

J. Gorman Delta H@: 

I SOQ Nozzle Size: 

n td? XADThermocouple 10: 

.2142-

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. ' 

LEAK CHECKS: 

U In. CFM 

In. 

In. 

0.003 

CFM 

CFM" 

0.84 

80810 

1.027 

INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT * 

y ye3" 

17 

FILTER DATA 

1.603 

0.440 _ ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

3 m 

Ji'ijiTABf >' 

SAMPLE;.' CLOQK.t 

;,TIME i 

\ ' 

ii^LOCITY/. 

•i* "HEAD • 

•JWtnP.loiw-

•" ORIFICE:. 

fiETERlAjt:' 

.JDallaM.lnwe 

•v-';6A8METER

 :;

-

;;.,...;ypui»i6-;.,. 

: .% . 

SAMPLE;.' CLOQK.t TEMPERATURE READfNGB, ¥ 

;,TIME i 

\ ' 

ii^LOCITY/. 

•i* "HEAD • 

•JWtnP.loiw-

•" ORIFICE:. 

fiETERlAjt:' 

.JDallaM.lnwe 

•v-';6A8METER

 :;

-

;;.,...;ypui»i6-;.,. 

: .% . 

, i..ajjj5R-./, .-JJiPRpag/J-j jflPEBBO^, 

:. \Xmrn; •','•> I" .iMPIHQEH --rt: 

•.(jFUlKOlilUI 

. »» • 

IETER-. •• . 

../.•OUT.-i}; 0 •1? I.1H 310 •2*10 2H5 i l l l 4 75 

« 7.» • -36 •\M 370 as/ ass 75 1? V 

A3 IS. 00 .31 H § 7% §

( ffe 1% 

A4 3290 • 30 (•<,<* 291 11 7,7 

AS 30.00 i.q I.Q S W / aw 7 5 . i i 

AA 37.» ;?so ;HS LI /l 60 

A7 4S.00 l.S ) W JHS sS a<36 76 <•$ M 

AS •:.«o 

• J Asp H 6 fiS • 2 80 74, >1 i+ej>r*<rf 4 fori- CU V 

•1 KK 

•l* 365 T<\ 54 M l 4,1 ?? ?f 

a: <1.K /•b 56s aso a l l f</ i . * V 

ai 75.00 1.9 $W0 , b >b£ a so 7t«< 75 «/ 

w •3.W 

<« 5-H5.9 366 a CO a«{6 u 

BS 00.00 1,§ 3C4 * n •7S 

n «7.M 

• 4 |.<?8 S5t.r 371 Afff a 4 V6 76 '5 

B7 10S.OO l.lff 31^ a 51 SO DCS 77 5 

u tia.eo l Y 561. fc> 36"? SI Ail 79 

'30.00 —r 4 

1

 • 

. 

r 

* 

1 

:.;..'<i^aER,yoj.jC?? 

100 

100 

a s 

4 f t 

ID 

m i 

ORSAT DATA 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

< 

m 

o 

o 

ro 

00 
ENSk i A£COM EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING • FIELD DATA SHEET 

SAMPUNG TRAIN: M5/ Particulate BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: rt .OS INITIAL VAC. 

PLANT: ONYX Environmental STATIC PRESSURE (•/•): .m MID VAC. 

DATE: GS-ll-A k Probe/Pllot Number: FINAL VAC. 

TEST LOCATION: Unit 03 Fixed Hearth Pitot Coefficient: 0.84 

RUN NUMBER: RI3 Filter Box No.: 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 39" Meter Box Number: actio INIT. PITOT 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 1.031 FINAL PITOT 

OPERATOR: T.ucWwu-l Delia H @: l.9Gi 

START TIME: 1 115 Nozzle Size: WW ORSAT Initial: 

STOP TIME: XAD Thermocouple ID: ORSAT Final: 

Impinger Outlet ID: Lt-J 3 

r

CHECKS: 

. In. CFM 0.6<X\ 

CFM 

CFM ' 

In. 

' In. 

FILTER DATA 

FOR MOISTURE CALC 

NET GAIN: \!j ^3.§ ml. 

,-MWfiUL 

S B . 

•METER.VyL.' 

OAS METER 

:

!

r-"votuME./-; pFROBE 

2££ 

•i uo. 

TEMPERATURE REAOW 

J l l _2£_ 

•BIT 

'- PUMP 

(YACUUM , 

ftzellfogii^ 

JL5. 

• IG> J 5 £ 

J5_ 5i?3.5 05 5 5 3 3 1 rAg3 

EM m i J &i 

a 

35E T 

3bf am _2L 

_2i _22L _13_ 

T7£T 4>oj .o 3 5 0 JiL 

_LiL M i Jik5_ JJlL .iii J U L 

i s 

75 

Tit s 

35 31 

LO 175 J l l JLSL 

0 5 •1 

1 

J l l 

3 E 

3 

T 

"Z5 .1 3£L at JL5L 

Ml,5 JUL 3 M 

s 

"13" 

TT" 

_A£L J U- J U 33_ 

33E 

J o s 

JLV 

Mp.7 Jil L 

jUg_ 

*5CL 

Jil l 

£18 

i t JJik. 

JUL JLL 

< 

m 

a> 

o 
j 

Metal s Dat a 

VES 0023 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS I 

Date 10-May-06 10-May-06 11-May-06 

AVGS I 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS I 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.408 0.431 0.431 0.423 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 81.248 83.546 76.761 80.518 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 86.8 71.2 78.0 78.7 

Avg Delta H in H2 0 1.57 1.76 1.42 1.58 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1156 0.1292 0.1041 0.1163 

DGM Calibration Factor — 1.0390 1.0330 1.0390 1.0390 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 79.598 84.056 76.269 79.974 

Total Water Collected mL 1271.1 1380.4 13005 \3\72 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 59.932 65.086 61.304 62.108 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 43.0 43.6 44.6 43.7 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 102.8 103.0 103.0 102.9 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.5705 0.5636 0.5544 0.5628 

C02 at Stack %dry 6.40 6.80 7.00 6.73 

O;, at Stack %dry 12.40 9.40 X0.00 10.60 

CO + Nj, %dry 81.20 83.80 83.00 82.67 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.52 29.46 29.52 29.50 

Wet Molecular Weight 1Mb-mole 24.57 24.46 24.39 24.47 

Excess Air at Stack % 137.2 73.9 83.9 98.3 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure inH2 0 0.22 0.21 0.07 0.17 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.12 29.04 29.06 29.07 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381.2 m.i 371.4 374.6 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P _ 0.4128 0.4235 0.3843 0.4069 | 

SDE Average — 11.972 12509 11.082 11.754 I 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 | 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,929 1,974 1,794 1,899 j 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 16,001 16,377 14,883 15,753 J 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,774 \0,097 9,178 9,683 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,576 5,691 5,088 5,451 

Isokinetics % 109 101 102 104 

Meter Box No. _ 80184 80184 80184 — 

Delta H @ inH2 0 1.8810 1.8810 1.8810 -

Reid QA Yqc ^.0340 1.0500 1.0313 1.038 

[Deviation} Pre-Y % 0.48% 1.06% 0.74% 0.8% 
Run l AVGS-METAL S 

Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Run 2 AVGS - METALS 

Delta H | STACK 

TEMP 

Run 3 AVGS ~ METAL S 

PT Delta P SORT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SORT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H 

a1 0.15 

0.20 

0.20 

0.21 

0,21 

0,18 

0.1 S> 

0.11 

0.14 

0.17 

0.20 

0.18 

0.3873 

0.4472 

0.4472 

0.4583 

I 0,4583 

0.4243 

I 0.3873 

0,3317 

0,3742 

i 0.4123 

0,4472 

0.4243 

73 

78 

81 

84 

88 

89 

90 

91 

88 

93 

94 

95 

72 

74 

75 

77 

83 

84 

85 

85 

87 

88 

89 

1.38 

1.80 

1.80 

1.92 

1.92 

1.65 

1.40 

1.00 

1.30 

1.56 

1.80 

1.65 

366 

379 

381 

385 

382 

383 

382 

381 

367 

385 

386 

386 

0.12 

0.21 

0.20 

0.21 

0.21 

0.20 

0.17 

0.12 

0.15 

0.17 

0.20 

0.17 

0.3464 

0,4583 

0,4472 

0.4583 

0.4583 

0.4472 

0.4123 

0.3464 

0.3873 

0.4123 

0.4472 

0.4123 

79 

76 

74 

72 

72 

70 

71 

72 

69 

72 

73 

72 

77 

75 

74 

73 

71 

68 

68 

68 

68 

68 

69 

68 

1.20 

2.00 

1.90 

2.00 

2.00 

1.90 

1.60 

1.20 

1.46 

1.60 

1.90 

1.60 

359 

375 

376 

376 

373 

371 

368 

367 

358 

371 

375 

376 

0.16 

0.17 

0.18 

0.17 

0.16 

0.15 

0.12 

0.10 

0.12 

0.16 

0.18 

0.17 

0.4000 

0.4123 

0.4243 

0.4123 

0.4000 

0.3873 

0.3464 

0.3162 

0.3464 

0.4000 

0.4243 

0.4123 

71 

75 

77 

79 

80 

81 

81 

81 

78 

81 

83 

83 

71 

71 

72 

72 

74 

75 

76 

76 

77 

77 

78 

78 

1.S0 

1.60 

1.70 

1.60 

1.50 

1.45 

1.15 

0.95 

1.15 

1.55 

1.70 

1.60 
II 

I 

i l 

11 

I 

i1 

5 

ffl 

liiliililSiiiiil S 

S§§SSS§§SS§9§S§S§ 

SISSIIIIllllllSil 

11111111111111 

1 1 

I 

!92§ 

1151131 

i i 

IIIIIIIIIls 

ffl 

iidildiNiiiNiiii i 

i t 

iiiiiiii i 

i l l 

si 

II 

i i 

is 

I 

!! 

1? A £ 

I! : 

I 

I 

1 

!! 

i l ! 

I" 

n 

i n 

S i 

.a A § 

II f 

2 

I 

1 . 

! I J 

i 

o 

J 

i 1 1 

i 

4.87 

TOTAL Hg 

II* i 1 

I 

* 

! 

I a 

i i 

FRONT HALF 

BACK HALF 

3 

11 

I 

IS 

i l 

I 

i i 

f! 

.a .a 

se 

5= is 

VES 0023! 
ENSR AECOM 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTAL 

Element 

Sample 

ug 

Fid B)k 

ug 

Default 

Value (a) 

H 

5* of 

Sample 

Mg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

ug 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Defaull 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

ug 

Corrected 

Back Half 

u

8 

Corrected 

FH + BH 

i Ml 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 j 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 249.00 0.76 * 13.78 12.45 248.24 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 1 248.24 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 -1 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.10 (0.10) 13.78 0.01 0.10 0.00 0,00 1.00 

-

0.00 | o.io 

Cadmium (Cd) 1.38 0.34 * 13.78 0.07 1.04 0.00 0.00 1.00 _ 0.00 I 1.04 

Coball (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 | 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 29.00 1.01 » 13.78 1.4S 27.99 J 0.00 0.00 1.00 - . 0.00 I 27.99 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 8 0.00 0.00 1.00 .. 0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0,00 1.00 . 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (NI) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 _ 0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 22.30 2.70 ' 13.78 1.12 19.60 0.00 0.00 1.00 _ 0.00 19.60 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tt) 0,00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 | 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 ng use blank value lo correct 

If FHB > 13.78 ug then use the greater ot 13.78 |ig or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY: 

(a) - based on a 3,54 - In, Alter size 

If BHBis>Obut<=l ug then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is > I ug use the greater of either I ug or3%of BH 

( ) Not Detected /Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

M8 

Defaull 

Value 

"g 

5* of 

Sample 

Kg 

Conected 

Amount Hg 

ug CLIENT: Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

FRONT HALF 0.10 (0.03) 6.00 0.01 0.10 PROGRAM: Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

BACK HALF 121.23 0.04 * 6.00 6.06 121.19 RUN NO. Run 2 

1 TOTAL Hg 121.29 

If FB it >0 but <=6 pg then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ug use the greater of either 6 |tg or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 
ENSR AECOM 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

< 

m 

GO 

o 

o KJ 00 

if FB is >0 but <=6 ug then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ug or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

FH + BH 

" f Element 

Sample 

PS 

Fid Blk 

Pg 

Default 

Value (a) 

UR 

5% of 

Sample 

Mg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

MB 

Sample 

Mg 

Fid Blk 

MS 

Default 

Value 

pg 

5% of 

Sample 

Pg 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Pg 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

FH + BH 

" f 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 || 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 946.00 0.76 * 13.78 47.30 945.24 0.00 0.00 1.00 _ 0,00 945.24 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.10 (0.10) 13.78 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.10 

Cadmium (Cd) 2.76 0.34 * 13.78 0.14 2.42 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.42 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13,78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 55.80 1.01 • 13.78 2.79 54.79 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 54.79 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0,00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0,00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0,00 13,78 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 -. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Lend (Pb) 40.60 2.70 » 13.78 2.03 37.90 0.00 0.00 ' 1.00 

-

0.00 37.90 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13,78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0,00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .- 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 . 0.00 13.78 •- 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0,00 0.00 

lf FHB is between 0 to 13.78 ug use blank value to correct 

if FHB > 13.78 ug then use the greater of 13.78 ug or the lesser value between FHB pr 5% of FHS. 

* - volge used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.54 - in. filter size 

MERCURY: 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 pg then use the BHB value to correct 

lf BHB is >1 ug use Ihe greater of either l.pg or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected/Reportable Detection Limit 

CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value 

fg 

5% of 

Sample 

n 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

MS 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 pg then use the BHB value to correct 

lf BHB is >1 ug use Ihe greater of either l.pg or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected/Reportable Detection Limit 

CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

FRONT HALF 0.27 (0.03) 6.00 0.01 0.27 j PROGRAM : 

Fixed Hearth Kil n #3 

BACK HALF 89.12 0.04 * 6.00 4.46 89.08 R U N NO . Ru n 3 

| I TOTAL Hg 89.35 

R U N NO . Ru n 3 
ENS.. K£COM EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

SAMPLING TRAIN: M29/Metals 

PLANT; ONYX Environmental 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: Unit »3 Fixed Haarlh 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 39" 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/•): 

.Protw/Pltot Number: 

Pilot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient ft): 

.Delta H @: 

Nozzle Size: 

.XAD Thermocouple ID: 

INITIAL VAC. 

] MID VAC. 

' FINAL VAC. 

0.84 

'/~f*i 

6-4*6 

INIT. PITOT 

~ FINAL PITOT 

_ ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

$0 In. CFM ,OOX~ 

In. CFM 

8 In. CFM • D04 

" > FILTER DATA 

Rinse 

'liNfi^B^ mm Volume* 

0 

100 

100 

0 IS 

100 to? 

100 I0O BLflLM 

SAMPLE, 

'•; paiYiM 

C4.0CK . 

/•/TIMES' 

'VSLOCITY.;-

.HEAD 

'ORIFICE •' 

.^biibHkiwiii 

,..pA8 METER! 

.t^vOLUMEfv' 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, "F I -•'PUMP''".;: 

.,>;.y*&W'-.' 

wAlitiHe'SWi 

SAMPLE, 

'•; paiYiM 

C4.0CK . 

/•/TIMES' 

'VSLOCITY.;-

.HEAD 

'ORIFICE •' 

.^biibHkiwiii 

,..pA8 METER! 

.t^vOLUMEfv' 

•|%Vi*Mi*««£ 

IFJLTiRBOjJ;' 

..i.ritaHs* ;a3^ 

,?IHSIH9tS-:-.v "•.llAOTnp,'' 

:.%,iV:!»i»,.W&; 

- AM I 

-•'PUMP''".;: 

.,>;.y*&W'-.' 

wAlitiHe'SWi 

'Mi'"" 0 16 0./sr /.•%» "IT/ * 7 A H.o 

X ?,<T / f 278.1.1 - 2 4 7 f i Ca.o 

J ~a.io 1 s t i S O . 7:r -

tine O.-Ll 2,f7 h.0 

o,y w 38i _ "Ui f 1«t > %l &i C/O P&rrAikr 1/0-7 

I D.tft /.*tr 1(60.1 S ~ 3 £ 3 <T3- 61 Sf 

1 a < r if? ssIO vf: 

a e l l I/O- IO •32 / •iS O S T B 1 «?/ 

Srv/* Pew eJhA*&e" 

3 6 7 IS 7 e ^ #<> £0<samr /(Sy 

-0-/ 7 /.$•& 67 V.s r 

~0.1 © /SO i f ? |5 <*i 

H °>t/t r<r « 9 s u o 

5 \Q Its 'Q.(& ZS5 T ? o «r-» o> - O.io Hit.*?- 2SC 2Vf i 

. 1 / -<40 •25 6 AM. V( 

ft 111- 382 - r 

; 

! s 

X 

\ 

vji-'.'n:-.T-,;.S".'jvi 

ORSAT DATA 

FOR MOISTURK CALC: 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

ro 

co 
< 

m 

co 

o o ro 

ENSk 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

iiu 

M2S 

4 EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPUNO - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Onyx 

S/10/20M 

TEST LOCATION: Unit #3 

RUN NUMBER: JR2 

Stack Diameter - Inchee: 39 

OPERATOR: B. Hardy 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: ._ 

fSbO 

J3& 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

_ STATIC PRESSURE (•/-): 

ProbeJPItot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

_ Filter Box No.: 

_ Meter Box Number: 

.Orifice Coefficient ft): 

Delta HQ : 

Noale Size: 

XAD Thennocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

— 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. \ 

FINAL VAC. 

LEAK CHECKS: 

J 4 In. CFM 

In. 

0.004 

80184 INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT" 

CFM_ 

CFM" 

II 

FILTER DATA 

1,881 

0.431 

bt't V 

.ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

SAMPLE 

POINT 

CLOCK 

•'JTI'ME.;; 

•VELOCITf, 

. HEAD.. 

'ooH^inyi 

ORIFICE". 

METEffUpLi 

•tMlpM: •>«»'' 

.' ^QAjB'METER'.1. ( 

^..•.' VOLUME ,- '. 

TEMP ERATURE READINGS, 6' PWW' L' 

•-. VACOjlM^l 

: 4KH0X1.., 

SAMPLE 

POINT 

CLOCK 

•'JTI'ME.;; 

•VELOCITf, 

. HEAD.. 

'ooH^inyi 

ORIFICE". 

METEffUpLi 

•tMlpM: •>«»'' 

.' ^QAjB'METER'.1. ( 

^..•.' VOLUME ,- '. -^."YPi^.-r "JiMFIN0aR;-3 

,./.'•<»••'>^-.iS 

.v.. - :1M. ty,KIE , R V t- -, 

: 

6' PWW' L' 

•-. VACOjlM^l 

: 4KH0X1.., Al 0 fl 11- <*rl •JsV ' 7.<?f a « 7 NA 

Al r.so o,u iM< f ? HA 

A3 15.00 Vf) NA 7 V If 

M 22.90 0-2.1 V f y <3 NA O l . 

AS 30.00 2,51 S i " MA 7 i - n :£p 

M J7.M ISO HA 7 « 

A; 40.00 0.17 1'V H$ sr7 HA 0( 

AS ueo / A S 2 - HA 7t 08 

SI eo.oo <Q.\<r TO •<ft- NA 

B b$ l 0760 fi LI i.O 46 [.4 - \n\ S 7 NA n% STlrlrt ditto ' * < 

W 76.00 A i n -n<r 2V7 Jtj HA ?* i!<? 

B4 02.00 0.(7 Ufl r/i.d ? T7U Z.">T> * 7 NA TL. 

BS 00.00 o a © i7t, NA 11 t 

BS S7.S0 #?.v> i. Y , '-"e ' " - " '_ T~ 

B7 100.00 iik "571, 2S"> HA ^ £ Bl <I2.U o, n «Vf , - -sty- HA 1

 r 120.00 NA ! 

1 

' ' ' ' ' '• ' .. ' ' 

* — 

] 

1 .. . ... 

1 

( 

1 

•" > 

/*" 

100 

100 J 3 i 

Final Vol. IS.M 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

i%'i 

pWMOISTURECAL9.: 

NET GAIN: |3S A. 
ENSk EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

SAMPLING TRAIN: M28/Melals 

PLANT: ONYX Environmental 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 

Unit «3 Fixed Hearth 

3 

39" 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: = = f ¥ : 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

.STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

.Probe/Pilot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

.Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H® : 

Noztla Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

+ ,07 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

' FINAL VAC. 

LEAK CHECKS:. 

It, .In. CFM 

It). CFM 

7 In. CFM' 

0.84 

116-:$ 

som 

jq3j 

INIT. PITOT 

~ FINAL PITOT 

_ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

FILTER DATA 

•SAMPLE.-

• x>i«r > ?T1MS'V; 

»'• 0RJF1WA ..'•;

'9As,MET£R/i' : 

'••jf^OME 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, T 

k VACUt«l_, f ^ COMMENTS^ 

•SAMPLE.-

• x>i«r > ?T1MS'V; 

»'• 0RJF1WA ..'•;

'9As,MET£R/i' : 

'••jf^OME .. .STACK:*:; 

•J..£i~.::i>.'.V» 

•PROBE;?,. FILTER B^Xv. v'XADTOp. 

:. -".-. L«.li.i,;V": 

k VACUt«l_, f ^ COMMENTS^ 

A. 1 J 'IK t.s- *fc>"7 <?£ *7f 

a 373. 3-57 *+* vs~ If to 

7> tr 'xx$ '(•1 *73 77 72- it 

H >M~ 3o E>-17 f.L -*T7 l 2L. i 7<T X 5 fe 3i> ' OAC, t& * 7 f •?¥ 6 

ft l-HS 37$ 26'i. -?t- & 

•( M S Gli'l-X - S72- 3S?t> Lo 7 < f elt4<» 6.\0 ?£7 e i 

577, <rt* 

Bl i» US LS*Q 77 

3 p&" 7> I.S5 •ts-/ 7 7 

X n ax UI ^ipir- is-} "7fi 

i UT 'in &-q U(p 375 UA x r / •7* 

5 do *K t-tfsr 07 <-

I n? /«>' o-ttr IM<T 17ST- 2. SO fi 0 * 3 7 ? 

1 6S UXi i.isr 3 7 f 74 

ft •I? -17_ ..i r • uhi6 >7^ If a V, / 

.:iMP!WSj,yj5i-8.:',. 

iiii i 

too 

100 

100 

100 

ML 

U3_ 

I0X 

(DO 

ItS.7 I MS 

Rlnte 

Volumes 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 
ENSR AECOM 

ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

PLANT: ONYX Environmental Services 

DATE: — 

LOCATION: Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

SAMPLE TYPE: 

OPERATOR: 

PRE-LEAK CHECK: 

POST-LEAK CHECK: 

NOTE: Check: Liquid level must not fel 

below bottom ot capitoiy tubing h 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

0.2 mL »i 4 minutes. 

DATA CRITERIA -

CO,: When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

O,: When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less.' 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shad be 0.3% or less. 

Net 02 is actual 02 minus actual C02 reading. 
Jun e 200 6 Tes t 

) 

VES 00236 
Particulat e Matte r Dat a 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 19-Jurv06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

Stop Time 17:29 1£29 12:44 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.431 0.431 0.431 0.431 

Barometric Pressure in.Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 ^20.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 | 

Avg. DGM Ternp. °F 110.6 111.2 109.0 110.3 8 

Avg Delta H inHzO 1.31 1.43 1.41 1.38 8 

Avg Delta H in.Hg 0.0964 0.1049 0.1034 0.1016 | 

DGM Calibration Factor 

-

1.0070 1.0070 1.0070 1.0676 1 Gas Sample Volume dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Total Water Collected mL 1341.0 1487.9 1340.1 1389.7 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 63528 70.154 63.186 65.523 

Moisture (measured) %v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

Moisture (@ saturation) %v/v 101.3 101.3 101.5 101.3 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 

-

0.5333 0.5216 0.5446 0.5332 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

0 2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

CO + N2 %dry 82.60 84.20 83.00 83.27 1 

_JDry MolecularJW^ight____ lb/1b-mole 29.58 29.54 29.57 29.57 | 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.18 24.02 24.30 24.17 H 

Excess Air at Stack % 84.7 58.5 78.0 73.7 1 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure inH2 0 -0.15 -0.15 -0.13 -0.14 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.54 29.54 29-49 29.52 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386.2 387.9 385.9 386.6 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3701 0.3922 0.3930 0.3851 

SDE Average 

-

10.765 11.420 11.429 11.205 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,736 1,847 1,840 1,808 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,399 15,326 15,262 14,996 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,870 9,422 9,390 9,228 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 80754 -

Delta H @ inHzO 1.832 1.832 1.832 -

Field Q A Yqc -

1.0066 ' 0.9918 0.9974 0.9986 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 0.04% 1.51% 0.95% 0.84% 

S.VJO3\2006\Ony>f^erf<>mira TasftTest OabUune 2006V2nD RetesntPMjdspATA 
Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

PT 

Runl Run 2 Run 3 

PT Dalta P SORT 

Dalta P 

DGM 

IN 

OGM 

OUT 

Delia H STACK 

TEMP 

Delia P SORT 

Delia P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delia H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SORT 

Delia P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delia H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.07 0.2646 104 102 0.66 382 0.10 0.3162 102 99 0.92 382 0.17 0.4123 89 87 1.53 379 

a2 0.12 0.3464 104 102 1.13 387 0.10 0.3162 106 102 0.92 383 0.15 0.3873 92 89 1.35 380 

a3 0.19 0.4359 109 104 1.79 386 0.16 0.4000 108 103 1.47 386 0.14 0.3742 95 90 1.26 379 

B.4 0.19 0.4359 111 104 1.79 387 0.18 0.4243 111 104 1.66 389 0.14 0.3742 108 106 1.26 384 

as 0.15 0.3873 114 106 1.41 388 0.14 0.3742 112 105 1.29 387 0.18 0.4243 112 106 1.62 388 

aB 0.16 0.4000 115 107 1.50 388 0.15 0.3873 112 106 1.38 385 0.18 0.4243 114 . 107 1.62 388 

a7 0.12 0.3464 115 106 1.13 383 0.18 0.4243 115 107 1.66 385 0.12 0.3464 116 108 1.08 387 

aB 0.15 0.3873 116 104 1.41 382 0.15 0.3873 116 109 1.38 388 0.10 0.3162 117 109 0.90 381 

b1 0.07 0.2646 113 111 0.66 382 0.18 0.4243 110 110 1.66 386 0.22 0.4690 112 111 1.98 384 

b2 0.14 0.3742 113 111 1.32 383 0.18 0.4243 114 111 1.66 388 0.17 0.4123 112 111 1.53 388 

b3 0.11 0.3317 115 111 1.03 389 0.18 0.4243 116 112 1.66 390 0.18 0.4243 116 112 1.62 389 

64 0.13 0.3606 116 111 1.22 391 0.16 0.4000 118 112 1.47 391 0.19 0.4359 118 113 1.71 390 

b5 0.14 0.3742 116 112 1.32 390 0.18 0.4243 119 113 1.66 392 0.18 0.4243 120 114 1.62 390 

be 0.15 0.3873 116 112 1.41 387 0.16 0.4000 121 114 1.47 395 0.16 0.4000 .120 115 1.44 392 

b7 0.17 0.4123 117 112 1.60 388 0.14 0.3742 121 114 1.29 392 0.12 0.3464 120 115 1.08 391 

b8 0.17 0.4123 117 112 1.60 386 0.14 0.3742 122 115 1.29 387 0.10 0.3162 120 115 0.90 384 

• ft 

" i i ?T •y-w1.41 

i . • 

AVG 0.14 0.3701 I 110.6 1.31 386 0.16 0.3922 11 1.43 388 0.16 0.3930 109.0 386 - • 1.41 

i . • 

386 
ENSR 

Summing Train 

Run Number 

Cllcul 

Fuclllty Legation 

.Vourtt 

Date 

Operator 

Slack Dl»,-In, 

Start Tluit 

Stop Time 

:.o ; EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

_JUL L 

MINT 

A L 

T1MB 

WBLIK'HV 

ULAP 

P7 

Uerouietrlc Promt* 

Sialic )>rtilure(+/.) 

Prone/Mlal Number 

Pilot Cocfflclut 

Hlltr Boi No. 

Meter Box No. 

OrinctCotHlcltat 00 

Dtlla H (tf, 

NsultSln/Nt. 

XAD TbermotOMpli 10: 

Imp Omit. TC ID: 

OWPlCi' 

TTW1** 

CA&MCTSR 

ft? 

Orut 

•::oiv 

7.5 1.1 

7., 

10.0 

0.0 

•lift Rate 

, .roumjeijiru , 

ft 

4 ± L 

1 5 J L L t 

• a 

3 M 

13. 

JLiLL 

ipia ,9 

dl. LL\. 

r*Vrt>,r g .63? 

JUL 6 0 

-44-

1.32 i 

I S 

-4- i-32 1,0% .0 

T 

<n-5 JLdL 

1ML 

<*0 

T 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

N> 

CO 
< 

m 

in 

o 

o 

ro 

r o 

ENSR AECQM EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train M3 ^ 

kun Number 

Clleui 

Facility Location 

Sourer 

\1M _ _ 

Operator 

J20 . 

/ AS 

P'- W 

Ur4 i>3 

1 1 

01-JO - ftfc 

Barometric Pressor* 

Static Pwttin <•/•)_ 

Probc/Pltat Number 

Pilot Coefflcient _ 

Filler Boa Na. ~ 

Meter Box No. 

- p . t\ 

LEAK CHECKS tn

 nHg 

INITIAL VAC. \K 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 7 

FILTER DATA 

FINAI. riTQT 

Oraat 

•:om:-'Y.QV.-

1.4 8.2 

U 

Stan Time 

SlopTlmt 

NoxateSUc/No. 

XADTttrsHcouplE 

IffiD Oullel TC ID: 

aaaaaaaeaese. 

r

5o, a 

m « 3 ' 

Float Piirii Kate 

Stan Time 

SlopTlmt iaaq 

NoxateSUc/No. 

XADTttrsHcouplE 

IffiD Oullel TC ID: 

ID! -

r

5o, a 

:: SILICA BEIV: 

« 3 ' 

Float Piirii Kate 

Stan Time 

SlopTlmt 

NoxateSUc/No. 

XADTttrsHcouplE 

IffiD Oullel TC ID: Lt-t l H r

5o, a Final PH 

SIAMPU! 

MINT 

CLONIC 

TUHF ULAD 

DIMIHC* 

METER VOL V0MIMB 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, *F< ^65 ^ i i ' 

'„ COMMWrts 

SIAMPU! 

MINT 

CLONIC 

TUHF ULAD 

DIMIHC* 

METER VOL V0MIMB 

*#,*.<*, 

•••>i- • ij; 

jWMtlflf;. 

i i ' 

'„ COMMWrts 

A l a l l 

•••>i- • ij; 

jWMtlflf;. 

2 1.< •10 

.« fnli.O — M 106 I6X 

i IC • l b [Ml \e-iS. 2. a HO 7 YA & log IOS 

22.C \% \.t.L I£>fc0.3 a«t o — 

u> (OV 

s .10 •W tofif.P 2S7 o n 2yti c i II?. I0S 

c v < •1 5 1.39 IOIA . q J 8 5 a</ c — l o t 

7 HC • 18 I S S ? Y9 5 3 >07 

8 u.< • \S »lto\.8 AS! IT, life 1 0 ° H 

Bl 1,0 •18 i.fefo &%b 2M< SI? M» MO * 

a. • 1? (.fat aw — I'M l(, 

3 l.&fo ,1*7.fl 3H(b J?Y<9 M«| lib 

u . r .»£ Ml 133. i ? t > 

— 

? J 113 

s U i , t2ft.t » 35 a s l MR m u a i 

qi. 5 it, 1 4 1 134. 3 § nM«f r74<> pi MY s-. . 

7 »<* ).?< 139.S 

— JI \h 114 

9 112-T U S - f a u r 

i 

i 

i 

i 

iljl&iijliiHlij^ !!!lfl!!!!i!!l:;!!;i!lii!i ii'i'l'lflili ii'i'l'lflilii S l!!iiii!ii! l » 
ENSR AECOM EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sumpling Train 

Hu« Nurobtr 

C(i«m 

l-nclllly Location 

Suurcc 

Ditte 

Operator _ 

suck Din. >)u. 

Start Tint 

htop Time 

..SiVi.'ft.l IrH 

JLSL1 

tocfe 

Barometric Preuure 

Static Prentice (+/-)_ 

Probe/PHot Number 

Pilot Coefficient 

Filter Bo« No. _ _ 

Meter Bo« No. 

OrlflceCaeNUIeat (Y)_ 

Delta H ® 

NouleSlu/No. 

LEAK CHECKS la "Hi 

INITIAL VAC. It. 

MID VAC. 

.In. 

"in. 

• frog. 

FINAL VAC. 

INIT. PITOT 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM .got 

y K FINAL PITOT II 

f0<?7 

_FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DATA 

l a w XAD 1 hfrmocouplf ID: *— 

BHfrVPr&W 

/Si/ A 

f«r> 

I B 

DKMPU.' 

fflllM 

CLOCK 

nun 

tabocirr 

WAD 

Oi)Dlp,(oW, 

OWHlCK 

MjBlKRVOL 

t>e|l»fl.1n«f 

<J)tS.IilE.T^ri. 

VOI PMI 

TEMPERATURE REi \DINGS . "F • 

• 

DKMPU.' 

fflllM 

CLOCK 

nun 

tabocirr 

WAD 

Oi)Dlp,(oW, 

OWHlCK 

MjBlKRVOL 

t>e|l»fl.1n«f 

<J)tS.IilE.T^ri. 

VOI PMI 1 i 'Bcairii r 

•M&ipiit*;, WAMtt i 

S§8§rrf,S32i33n288ffl 

A • l a I.S ^ • 

a 1.3 5 1»K . a 1V« 

3 . l Y 1,36, 37* sir ? 

M • w l.a/ „ U>5 . j M a — i;o f 1 

S • IR n t i .ft' m r?i/l — II ? i/> ^ 1 

t, X I . C •10 115. 1 a n — ft o , 0 1 t 

7 V C AX 3 97 — 5 T (16 / 

« •10 Ao S9I — , f * i n ) 

«» — 

6 i t o l^.t , !S$T S t . 

— 61 i n 

a n . c • I T I. S i — i i / 2 

1.4,2 aoo. q a HO (12 a 

1 aa. c U I ? W — .<-» I M SL 

s A O •II? 1.41 J l l A a c \ — UM 

i <I7-C .It, .OIL S ^ 1 a m — ijj o 

7 ie>c . 1 1 233 . <? 3,<H on •— 115 

113.5 • l o .<?o D37. Y I C O U S | 

Jsl. £S > — 

— 

— 

j 

ilillilHlili^iMlliililiiilHIiiiii ifHiHflfHililHfltillllitUilSis^ liiiiijO liiiiijOi iiiiiliiiiii i iiliiiliiiliiiiililil; Iff! • l|i alHsI^f^MiiitlilHillMi HI 11 ill l|i¥§*H3 

KIN8K 

73a 

Oraat 

;

;coi.-:| 

IA 

Li 

T1 

iFUtaffirjc Rale 
Metal s Dat a 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 19-Jur>-06 2OJun-06 2WurH)6 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

I Stop Time 17:29 12-59 12:44 AVGS 

1 Nozzle Diameter inches 0.431 0.431 0.431 0.431 

| Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

j Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 | 

I Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 110.6 1115 109.0 110.3 

Avg Delta H inHgO 1.31 1.43 1.41 1.38 

Avg Delta H iri. Hg 0.0964 0.1049 0.1034 0.1016 

DGM Calibration Factor -1.O070 1.0070 1.0070 1.0070 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Total Water Collected mL 1341.0 1487.9 1340.1 1389.7 | 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 63528 70.154 63.186 65.523 

Moisture (measured) %v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

Moisture (@ saturation) %v/v 101.3 101.3 101.5 101.3 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.5333 0.5216 0.5446 0.5332 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

0 2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 957 

CO + N2 %dry 82.60 84.20 83.00 8357 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.58 29.54 29.57 29.57 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.18 24.02 24.30 24.17 

Excess Air at Stack % 84.7 58.5 78.0 73.7 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure inH2 0 -0.15 -0.15 4}.13 -0.14 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.54 29.54 29.49 29.52 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386.2 387.9 385.9 386.6 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3701 0.3922 0.3930 0.3851 

SDE Average — 10.765 11.420 11.429 11505 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,736 1,847 1,840 1,808 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,399 15,326 15,262 14,996 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,870 9,422 9,390 9,228 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

Meter Box No. -

80754 80754 80754 — 

Delta H @ inH2 0 1.8320 1.8320 1.8320 

-

I Held QA Yqc — 1.0066 0.9918 0.9974 0.999 

I [Deviation] Pre-Y % 0.04% 1.51% 0.95% 0.8% 
Runl AVGS-METAL S 

Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Run 2 AVGS--METAL S Run3 AVGS-METAL S 

PT 

a1 

Delta P SORT 

Delta P 

0.07 0.2646 

DGM 

IN 

104 

DGM 

OUT 

102 

Delta H 

0.66 

STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P 

382 0.10 

SQRT 

Delta P 

0.3162 

DGM 

IN 

102 

DGM 

OUT 

99 

Delta HI 

0.92 

STACK 

TEMP 

Dalta P 

382 0.17. 

SQRT 

Delta P 

0.4123 

DGM 

IN 

89 

DGM 

OUT 

87 

Delta H 

1.53 

0.12 0.3464 104 102 1.13 387 0.10 0.3162 106 102 0.92 383 0.15 0.3873 92 89 1.35 

0.19 I 0.4369 109 104 1.79 386 0.16 0.4000 108 103 1.47 386 0.14 0.3742 95 90 1.26 

0.19 0.4359 111 104 1.79 387 0.18 0.4243 111 104 389 0.14 0.3742 108 106 1.26 

0.15 0.3873 114 106 1.41 388 0.14 0.3742 112 105 1.29 387 0.18 0.4243 112 106 1.62 

b1 

0.16 

0.12 

0.16 

0.07 

0.14 

0.11 

0.13 

0.14 , 

0.15 

0.17 

0.4000 

| 0.3464 

0.3873 

0.2646 

0.3742 

0.3317 

0.3606 

0.3742 

0.3873 

0.4123 

0.4123 

115 

115 

116 

113 

113 

115 

116 

116 

116 

117 

107 

106 

104 

111 

111 

111 

111 

112 

112 

112 

1.50 

1.13 

1.41 

0.66 

1.32 

1.03 

1.22 

1.32 

1.41 

1.60 

388 

383 

382 

382 

383 

389 

391 

390 

387 

388 

0.15 

0.18 

0.16 

0.18 

0.18 

0.18 

0.16 

0.18 

0.16 

0.14 

0.3873 

0.4243 

0.3873 

0.4243 

0.4243 

0.4243 

0.4000 

0.4243 

0.4000 

0.3742 

112 

115 

116 

110 

114 

116 

118 

119 

121 

121 

106 

107 

109 

110 

111 

112 

112 

113 

114 

114 

1.38 

1.38 

1.66 

1.66 

1.66 

1.47 

1.47 

1.29 

385 

385 

388 

386 

388 

390 

391 

392 

395 

392 

0.18 

0.12 

0.10 

0.22 

0.17 

0.18 

0.19 

0.18 

0.16 

0.12 

0.4243 

0.3464 

0.3162 

0.4690 

0.4123 

0.4243 

0.4359 

0.4243 

0.4000 

0.3464 

114 

116 

117 

112 

112 

116 

118 

120 

120 

120 

107 

108 

109 

111 

111 

112 

113 

114 

115 

115 

1.62 

1.08 

0.90 

1.98 

1.53 

1.62 

1.71 

1.62 

1.44 

1.08 
ENSR AECOM 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

FH + BH 

Element Kg 

Sample 

Ug 

Fid Blk 

MB 

Default 

Value (a) 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

Ug 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Ug 

Sample 

Mg 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value 

UR 

5% of 

Sample 

M« 

Corrected 

Back Half 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

FH + BH 

Kg 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 1 

Arsenic (As) 5.81 0.61 • 13.78 0.29 5.20 0.33 0.00 1.00 0.02 0.33 5.53 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. . 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 I 0.00 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 £3.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 9.64 0.79 » 13.78 0.48 8.85 1.06 0.00 1.00 0.05 1.06 M l 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 -. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0,00 13.78 .. 

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

lf FHB is between 0 to 13.78 ug use blank; value to correct 

lf FHB > 13.78 ug then use the greater of 13.78 ug or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY: 

(a) - based on a 3,54 - in. Tiller size 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

PS 

Fid Blk 

MB 

Default 

Value 

Ug 

5* of 

Sample 

Ug 

Corrected j 

Amount Hg 

Ug 

FRONT HALF 0,00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

BACK HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

I TOTAL Hg 0.00 ' | 

If BHB is »0 but<= I ug then use the BHB value lo correct 

If BHB is>l ug use ihe greater of either 1 ugor5%ofBH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM: Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Riml 

lf PB is >0 but <=6 ug then use the FB value to correct ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Umll 

If FB is >6 ug use (he grealer of either 6 ug or J * of FH • Indicates value used for blank conection 
ENSR AECOM 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

PO 

t o 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ug (hen use Ihe FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use (he greater of either 6 ug or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank collection 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTAL 

Corrected j 

FH + BH 

Element MS 1 

Sample 

Mg 

Fid Blk 

Mg 

Default 

Value (a) 

Mg 

5% of 

Sample 

M8 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Mg 

Sample 

Mg 

Fid Blk 

Mg 

Default 

Value 

Mg 

5* of 

Sample 

MS 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Mg 

TOTAL 

Corrected j 

FH + BH 

MS 1 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0,00 | 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 I 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

- 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 j 0.00 I 

Arsenic (As) 4.30 0.61 * 13.78 0.22 3.69 I 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 I 3.69 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 I 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 I 0.09 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

- 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 -. 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 3.98 0.79 • 13.78 0.20 3.19 0.66 0.00 1.00 0.03 0.66 3.85 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0,00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

o.oo 1 o.oo 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 0.00 0,00 13.78 - 0,00 1 0.00 0.00. 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 1 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 I 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 - | 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 |. 0.00. 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

o.oo I 0.00 0.00 1.00 

- 0.00 I 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 I 0,00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 1 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 ng use blank' value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 uglhen use Ihe greater of 13.78 u.g or Ihe lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS. 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.54 • in. filter size 

MERCURY: 

If BHB is>Obul<=I ug (hen use the BHB value to correct 

lf BHB is>l Mg use the greater of either 1 ugor5%of BH 

( ) Not Detected/ Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

MB 

Fid Blk 

MS 

Default 

Value 

Mg 

5% of 

Sample 

MB 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

M8 CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM : Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 2 

FRONT HALF 0.00 O.OO 6.00 0.00 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM : Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

BACK RUN NO. Run 2 HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM : Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 2 

| TOTAL Hg 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM : Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 2 
ENSR AECOM 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

< 

m 

w 

o 

o 

CO 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ug then use tbe FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ug use the greater of either 6 ug or 5* of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF ! 

TOTAL 

Corrected 1 

FH + BH | 

m

 J 

Element 

.Sample 

Ug 

Fid Blk 

Ug 

Defaull 

Value (a) 

Ug 

5% of 

Sample 

Ug 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Ug 

Sample 

Ug 

Fid Blk 

Ug 

Default 

Value 

Ug 

5* of 

Sample 

us 

Corrected 

Back Half 

US 

! 

TOTAL 

Corrected 1 

FH + BH | 

m

 J 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 5.60 0.61 » 13.78 0.28 4.99 0.21 0.00 1.00 0.01 0.21 | 5.20 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.00 0.00 13.78 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 || 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 11.10 0.79 * 13.78 0.56 10.31 0.84 0.00 1.00 0.04 0.84 11.15 | 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 | 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 I 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Lead(Pb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 

-

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 1 0.00 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 1 o.oo Selenium (Se) 0.00 0,00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 0.00 II 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 

0.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 -. 

0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 ug use blank value (o correct 

If FHB > 13.78 ugthen use the greater of 13.78 ug or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.54 • in. filler size 

MERCURY i 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 ug than use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 pg use Ihe greater of either 1 ug or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Ug 

Fid Blk 

fg 

Default 

Value 

Ug 

5% of 

Sample 

Ug 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

US CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM: 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 3 

FRONT HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM: 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 3 BACK HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM: 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 3 

fi TOTAL Hg 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM: 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 3 
ENS R EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

1 Oraat 

Sampling Train AW 1 A S Bareuicirlc Prcware 2 9 .S S LEAK CHECKS In "Hg 8E3IES?88l!853Ei3 :COJ:-

•:-:o2:-

Hun Number (VI Sialic rWriuret*/-) n INITIAL VAC. IU In. CFM ,ycAl 

Cllcul otJV 7.5 n5 y Probe/Pilot Number 5 " MID VAC . lo. CF M 330 7.5 n5 

Facility Locution U lO i f 2 - 5»»HCC-|- Pilot Coefficient • s it FINAL VAC . 5" In. CF M •oof 

7-i l(?.0 Source r'iller But No. •Jt + - CCrO 7-i l(?.0 

Dale of.- n-a . Meier Boi No. INlT.MTt PINAL riTOT 

Operator Orific IM e Coefflcient (V) 1.00") FILTER DATA IM 

Slack Ola. - lo. 15" Delia H@ l.ft IttKWTMBI mm. 

Start Tlnie NouleShe/No. 

Slap Time XADTucrmocouplelD: '— •:-:'j:.:-siui .AififeLv:^-!-'!' Float Purge Rate 

Imp Outlet TCIDJ LX-Q Final PH 

SAMPLE CLOCK WLOCIIV ORHHC*! ^AS METER . ' TEMPERATURE READINGS. T 

•yuetiljilt 

1 iVte 

• "i V > t ' * i 

fOIMT J1MI- MCTKM.V0I,, 

h*|l«tl,ta*r 

\OL0MI' 

ft* 

l rrT riTi j PRt&IWC' 

'Wit*;** rtMGHrMm M 

•yuetiljilt 

1 iVte 

i i 

t 

i 

Al o O'l •U> avh IV" -

jlOM /62 

s .\1 I.I X 9<?l.tj 3 * 7 AO ?«H — /«2 » 

3 IS • is •13 a ft a?3 — .<-.| Sol ;W 3 

33. f tool . 8 3 a i A3(o — "1 J 

$ 15 (ofl.t? •*.«} 2HO — M m /Ofc 3 

37. 5 -it. 5 0 te.13 3 K f — n c »UT •3 

1 H S ,10 icui.u 2 3 $ ; m ICC 3 

« S2.S ln3J.<? 2 Sri a«fi - lo4 3 s-kp/Wf? it/ a 

V " 

6 0 .fat> ion. ! 34a &{ •n I U «? 

a A 1.5 1.32 , 0 31. 5 — SO 1'/ 

75 •1? 1.03 18<? a

1

* ( So !l$ M l a. 

S2. 5 fo^O •<? 3*f| .aw rVft — Si 1(1 

5 •W 1.33 10^: 0 3<I6 53 !(<*> n a 

fe n - 5 - K L S I 3 S I *- I IX a. 

( to* •n . t o l o ^ C I a m .Vf S — i . a 4 

•17 — 

e 

. . . . 

. .i i, 
< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

w 

ENSR AECOM EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sumpllng I'tuln M31? 

Kun Number 

(Ileal 

Facility Location 

Source 

Date 

Operator 

Slack Ola, • la, 

Start Time 

slop'flue 

j A S 

Ofc-JO-ilk 

Barometric Prciiort 

Static Freuure («/•) — G\t':h 

Prosc/Fllot Number /15»H -B " 

Pilot Coefficient , 91/ 

Filter Boa No. 

Meter Boi Na. 

Orlflxe CoeHleieat (V) I ga l 

Bella H« 1.333 

Nauli Slic/No. 

XAD Tacraacauple ID: 

LEAK CHECKS la "Hg 

INITIAL VAC, 1*T In. CFM -06 3 

MID VAC. l«. CFM 

in. CFM^ .QOl 

+ -

FINAL PITOT t / V 

FINAL VAC, 7 

INIT.MTOT 

sat 

FILTER DATA 

HUM 

CLOOK 

TJMh 

V$L0Cl»¥ 

1IIAP 

Ml*.!*! * 

CAS-METrJR. 

VOLVMB 

It 

TEMPERATUR E READINGS . °F ,.,1 ^ ,„ 

,, wtnim 

'''>'•'''! , J ,

 1 ' 

, , i COMMiWP ' 

ii ' 1 i 

HUM 

CLOOK 

TJMh 

V$L0Cl»¥ 

1IIAP 

Ml*.!*! * 

CAS-METrJR. 

VOLVMB 

It 

II IM 

EWH? |. 

•"'""ri j 

ISr^KCTIaiaiSSHl 

,.,1 ^ ,„ 

,, wtnim 

'''>'•'''! , J ,

 1 ' 

, , i COMMiWP ' 

ii ' 1 i 

HUM 

CLOOK 

TJMh 

V$L0Cl»¥ 

1IIAP 

Ml*.!*! * 

CAS-METrJR. 

VOLVMB 

It 

II IM 

EWH? |. 

•"'""ri j 

"fw. i' igtit' 

,.,1 ^ ,„ 

,, wtnim 

'''>'•'''! , J ,

 1 ' 

, , i COMMiWP ' 

ii ' 1 i 

A l 0 i£M..T7iV 

II IM 

EWH? |. 

— • U 

"fw. 

3 •10 imi. O ZHO — L\ 163. 

A «r 1.47 1015. 2 a Ho iff ) _ <L f*« ( OS 

N •14 (Ofeo..-? a f o a w 

— SI tM l e v H 

S a o • r t i.a4 • to «S.5 ? 187 OHi — C<* i n ICS H 

c 77,< •15 1.35? JSS> 2X< 52 l/a ( 0 6 

7 HC ltd. 1« 1H1 5 3 M f I 0 7 

8 M . < Ifcliftl. B 3^^ no life l o < H 

B ( 40 • I B 211 P7? - MO n o 

1 

A. e 15 2Sifc*«>^lll3.l/ a w — rW UI L •• 

3 i < •Ift nn. » Sflr- _ lift I 

v < f •l£ HI .133.1 — 113 5 

S 10 

.» . U . ? A M I — h i i b qi. 5 I t •r n ff i p i l l¥ 

7 .w b i s \\ — | a | I M 

1 112* AH MS M L 4 1^ ur •/ 

150 

i 

! 

i 

1 

1 

i 

1 _ „ 

jiijllljijiiiiiii^ |l:i||iilil||; IIH(il|f^^ij|l|l iiliifliilHSiillltlis liHliiiiliiBlilililiifiiyilil^^ 

Onat 

•:coi:- •;,:o2:. 

7.6 

8-2 

U 

Rate 
ENSR AECOM EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train 

Hun Number 

Client 

.2150 . 

Facility Location 

Source . 

Dale 

Operator _ 

Stack Dla. • la. 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

Barometric Prcccurc 

Statle Freif lire(+/•) - .It. 

Probe/Fltot Number AS - H'fc" 

Pltol Coefficient • 0.M 

Filler Box NG. t\B ~S 

Meter Boe No. ftpl SM 

LEAK CHECKS la "llf 

INITIAL VAC. IL la. CFM • OOgL, 

MID VAC. la. CFM 

FINAL VAC. 1 . ~», CFM 

INIT. PITOT / / FINAL PITOT t^*' I 

JOCfaDelta H® |,93 l 

NoatleSute/No. .Mi l 

XADTbermoconplelDi *• /a/ ^ 

S4MVU: 

*$I«T 

A i . 

CLOCK 

T1WK MEAD Men ttH.y*>L, 

Imp Outlet TC ID! LX'lC L 

<iA^MCILK 

VOLUME 

I K 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. "F 

I|t'| | IMH|4 

.«MH». OWN 

' brut | 

•.••:oiy 

IA 

1-1 

T1 

J L L UP, 4 J2£ 

M 4 . 

IPS 106 

S 1 ° Jij- lif t -0 2&L JCU. J a £ 

y>.c sag _ £ L 4*. 

iiU . 

£ 2 _ HQ-5 116 10 

S1S- '10- M L 2i£L 2 1 

EE 3 W i i i 111 

3 2 J i * JLL 

JUL Lk2_ 31 3 MO 

1 3 1 

Ilk. Ml. ± _LLL Jcl. 

JJ2JL ^12a -

JiLL 126 

am. 

277.<? 

M2L JJiL J£4_ 

130 

io«r ML 3 T 3 21L S 3 

113.5 

iaO 

JO JLSiL M L U2_ 

US 

T 

< 

m 

a> 

o 

o 

NJ 

00 

- ^ l 

i:i!.i!:!i!fa.1l!'w!.:A.!.^ 
PCDD/PCD F Dat a 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 0023A Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVG S 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Ji«v06 

AVG S 

Start Time Units 14:40 9:30 9:30 

Stop Time 17:59 13:05 11:43 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.435 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg . 29.55 29.50 29.50 29.52 

Net Sampling Time min. 192.0 192.0 192.0 192.0 

Volume Metered dcf 135.215 136.331 133.046 134.864 

Avg. DG M Temp. °F 109.3 107.1 107.9 108.1 

Avg Delta H inH z O 1.71 1.74 1.67 1.71 

Avg Delta H L_.'Uj9. 

0.1257 0.1282 6.1225 0.1255 

D G M Calibration Factor 1.0320 1.0320 1.0320 1.0320 

Gas Sample Volume dscf h

f283ii3 129.710 126.379 128.151 

Total Water Collected mL 2171.7 2509.0 2250.4 2310.4 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 102.396 118.299 106.106 108.934 

Moisture (measured) %v/ v 44.4 47.7 45.6 45.9 

Moisture (@ saturation) %v/ v 101.3 101.5 101.5 101.4 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.5563 0.5230 0.5436 0.5410 

C02 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

O z at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

I CO' + Na 

%dry 82.60 84.20 83.00 83.27 

fi Dry Moiecuiar Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.58 29.54 29.57 29.57 

fi Wet Moiecuiar Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.44 24.04 24.29 24.26 

1 Excess Air at Stack 

% 84.7 58.5 78.0 73.7 

fi Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.6" 39.0 39.0 

fi Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

R Static Pressure inHaO -0.13 -0.15 -0.17 -0.15 

| Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.54 29.49 29.49 29.51 

I Avg. Stack Temp. °F 390.4 393.1 385.0 389.5 

J Avg. Sqroot of Delta P 

— 0.4113 0.4166 0.4062 0.4114 

| SD E Average -- 11.994

 1 12.168 11.808 11.990 

1 Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

fi Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,923 1,969 1,901 1,931 

fi Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,956 16,338 15,773 16,022 

fi Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,781 9,966 9,713 9,820 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,441 5,212 5,280 5,311 

isokinetics % 99 104 100 101 1 

Meter Box No. — 80645 80645 80645 — 

Delta H @ ...Jn- "9...... 

1.881 1.881 1.881 

-

Field QA Yqc 1.048 1.050 1.052 1.050 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.6% 1.7% 1.9% 

1.7% 1 

S:'LJOB'a006\Ony>*PBr<ormance TesOTest OataVlune 200612nd Retest<M23A Separate Front, Back Half june 2006.xjs]DATA 
< 

m cn 

o 

o 

N> 

CO 

RUN 1 AVGS -- PCDDs/PCDFs 

Method 0023A Sampling Parameters 

RUN 2 AVGS » PCDDs/PCDFs RUN 3 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs 

PT OP SQRT 

DP 

OGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP 8QRT 

DP 

OGM 

IN 

DQM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DQM 

IN 

OGM 

OUT 

DH 

A1 0.22 0.4690 103 100 2.20 389 0.14 0.3742 94 93 1.40 367 0.14 0.3742 95 1.40 

0.25 0.5000 105 101 2.50 389 0.14 0.3742 95 93 1.40 386 0.11 0.3317 97 95 1.10 

0.25 0.5000 114 103 8.60 389 0.20 0.4472 S6 94 2.00 389 0.15 0.3873 sa 1.50 

0.21 0.4583 115 105 2.10 389 0.20 0.4472 98 95 2.00 388 o.ie 0.4000 101 97 1.60 

0.22 0.4690 116 108 2.20 390 0.20 0,4472 101 96 2.00 3S0 0.16 0.3873 102 97 1.60 

0.21 0.4583 117 108 2.10 389 0.20 0.4472 105 97 2.00 390 0.16 0.3873 10S 99 1.60 

0.12 0.3464 117 109 1.20 390 0.20 0.4472 104 99 2.00 391 0.17 0.4123 107 100 1.70 

0.16 0.4000 116 108 1.60 389 0.16 0.3873 106 100 1.50 392 0.17 0.4123 107 101 1.70 

0.20 0.4472 116 109 2.00 390 0.18 0.4243 108 101 1.80 392 0.14 0.3742 106 104 1.40 

0.16 0.4000 118 108 1.60 389 0.20 0.4472 108 102 2.00 393 0.17 0.4123 107 104 1.70 

0.16 0.4000 115 109 1.60 391 0,20 0.4472 109 103 2.00 391 0.20 0.4472 109 106 2.00 

0.14 0.3742 116 108 1.40 391 0.20 0.4472 109 103 2,00 387 0.1S 0.3673 110 103 1.60 

0.13 0,3606 114 109 1.30 383 0.15 0.3873 109 104 1.50 384 0.20 0.4472 113 107 2.00 

0.16 0.3873 114 108 1.60 383 0.17 0.4123 108 104 1.70 385 0.20 0.4472 113 107 2.00 

0.13 0.3608 113 108 1.30 367 0.15 0.3873 108 1.60 384 0.20 0.4472 114 107 2.00 

0.14 0.3742 112 105 1.40 388 0.15 0.3873 110 104 1.50 390 0.20 0.4472 116 108 2.00 

B1 0.17 0.4123 108 106 1.70 392 0.16 0.3873 107 107 1.50 384 0,12 0.3464 109 108 1.20 

0,17 0.4123 107 106 1.70 392 0.14 0.3742 109 107 1.40 392 0.12 0.3464 109 107 1.20 

0.19 0.4359 108 106 1.90 394 0.12 0.3464 112 108 1.20 396 0.20 0.4472 110 107 2.00 

0.17 0.4123 109 105 1.70 394 0.18 0.4243 113 108 1.60 398 0.20 0.4472 113 109 2.00 

0.16 0.3873 110 106 1.50 394 0.18 0.4243 116 109 1.80 399 0.20 0.4472 114 109 2.00 

0.16 0,3873 111 106 1.50 395 0.4243 115 110 1.80 399 0.20 0.4472 115 109 2.00 

0.13 0.3606 111 107 1.30 388 0.19 0.4359 115 110 1,90 0.18 0.4243 114 109 1.60 

0.10 0.3162 112 107 1.00 383 0.19 0,4359 116 110 1.90 400 0.18 0.4243 116 110 1.80 

0.15 0.3873 112 107 1.50 388 0.17 0.4123 11S 112 1.70 401 0.12 0.3464 115 110 1.20 

0.16 0.4000 112 107 1.60 390 0.16 0.3873 116 111 1.50 400 0.14 0.3742 115 111 1.40 

0.1B 0.4243 112 107 1.80 394 0.17 0.4123 116 111 1.70 399 0.14 0.3742 115 112 1,40 

0.20 0.4472 112 107 2.00 393 0.17 0.4123 116 112 1.70 398 0.13 0.3606 116 111 1.30 

0.17 0.4123 112 107 1.70 395 0.18 0.4243 117 113 1.80 399 0.13 0.3606 115 111 1.30 

0.17 0.4123 112 107 

0.18 0.4243 112 107 

1.70 

1.80 

395 0.20 0.4472 116 113 2.00 398 0.17 0.4123 118 112 

39S 0,18 0.4243 116 113 1.80 398 0.22 0.4690 116 112 

1.70 

2.20 

0.18 0.4243 112 107 1.80 396 0.20 0.4472 115 113 2.00 0.22 0.4690 116 111 2,20 

AVQ 

mmm 

0.17 0.4113 109.3 

9 1 

mi 1.71 

mm m 

390 0.17 0.4166 107.1 1.74 393 0.17 0.4062 107.9 1.67 
ENSR|AcCO W 

Sampling Train DlOVlV^f 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING 

5 5 

FIELD DATA SHEET 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

CO 

- J 

Run Nurnber 

CHcui ~ 

Facility Location 

Source 

Dale 

Operator 

Slack Din, • la" 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

Barometric FrtMttre 

Static fre«iur«(*A) »» 

V/*HT .1 , 

fr-S-Hrlr- OMIT 3 

3 ?irV^ < 

/ V P 

MINT 

<'LQC)C 

JTMIS 

JiL 

3 1 

aja_ 

JLL. 

JUL 

-22 . 

-2iz _ 

JJe_ 

JlLjt . 

UK. 

iSJL 

1SL. 

y$M>ci»¥ 

W W 

^c)r.p, l»Wc 

g.r? / 

it 

JLJJd0, AT., 

<?,/7 

g./3 fly a 

a. A T 

OfcWIdt! 

•HK1HB.V01 

bt|i«|i,(nw 

r?,s 

/ 1 as 7W 

A fe 

us: 

i f 

/,S~ 

2 

A O 

1SL 

3 . 0 

Probc/FltotNuinl>cr_ 

Plmi Coefflcient _ 

KHItrr U M NO. 

Meter Boi Ng. _ 

OrinceCoeftaleat W 

Delta It® 

NouleSWNo. 

XAD Tccrmctouplc IDt 

I tup Outlet TCIDt 

LL2. 

LEA K CHECK S la " H I 

INITIA L VAC . /5 " 

MID VA C 

O l t+ FINAL VAC, ( \ 

cm 

CFM 

CFM 

i n(a>t.r INIT.HTOT _ 

+ 

FINAL PITOT 

6,1? 3 FIITEHDATA 

::NDMBEft:: 

fJlA 

t-< -as 

CAS-MErtjft. 

W>W?MB 

AllROO 

336, If*, 

931.9S3 

^V7, //. ? 

Ass: coo 

afai, ?iTf 

37S, 36g 

i l l 9$$ \W~ 

TEMPERATURE 

3SS 

3>8 3£? ± 

3 9 o 

S B 7 

2 2 a 

311 

2SA 

M 5 L 

3£i 

31V 

1 2 ^ 

£11. 

t93 7 

£L7_ 

*3 7 

&<l.a 

I l l 

3dJL 

±3M 

^ r o 

521 

£ 3 Z 

ISsE 

M L 

r9.^<: 

4^ 

3 2 ^ 

go 

^ 2 , 

t 

fe 

LLSL 

ILL 

Ih. 

4Xr 

IL 

JUL i n . 

' i t 

toe 

yog 

i .06 

2 a Z 

/OS 

/o 

L° 

/o8 

JsdL 

Loj_ 

US 

/Ok, 

lUk. 

/Ofo 

US-

/OA 

/0 7 

/el 

/o-S 

IcXL 

f-.-o 

3 C E 

/o.o 

/Q.O 

Onat 

•:oor.- •.•:6i:-

V . ? 

7.y 

,"0,0 

MM 

FjSTTuri'e Rate 

Final FH 

FbrtT CHti/<f<r 

tfiiu. CHIC 
ENSR AECO M EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train ty3i3/X 

Kun Number_ C'lcul JL 

M o 

Dat -PC e 

Operator MnLL 

Start Ttae /VUlO /j>gj Stop Time , /fa/g 

mm' 

(LOCK 

TfMR mom* IHAI) 

pe)fli^,jBWt 

r>t/7 

Barometric Prewure_ Static Freuire (+/•)" 

Probe/Pilot Namber_ Pitot Coefflclcol ~ 

Filter Bol No. _ 

Meter Doi No. 

Orifice Coefflcteol (Y) 

Delia H @ 

NoaleSlu/No. 

XAD Tliermocoaple ID.' 

Imp Outlet TClDi 

t<&*< 

LEAK CHECKS la "Hi 

INITIAL VAC, A?" 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

CFM CFM CFM 

IN1T.FITOT t/' S FINAL HTOTV^L / 

FILTER DATA 

MCTBfcWH 

aTEMPERATURE READINGS, 

HIMTi:-

| Petal | 

Rale 

ipViUri' .'.MpftllLg 

3 2 C 

.'.tow;,, 

•^eaaa^laBae^eiaatk 

1LSL 

IFInil PH 

ill . 

/go J 3 7 /°7" 

/q7-

.mag / 
ENSR A l . (..»>> 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

N> 

CO 

00 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train 

Hun NorohtT 

Clkm 

KwcMily l.pc»lil>u 

Source 

DimOfivralor 

Suck IM*. • lu. 

i'(nr(Tlme 

Slop Time 

Bxroiuolrlc Pressure 

SUIIcPrtiiure (•/•)' 

• a. 

xoi:-

nt 

7-W £2 
< m 

ENS R i AECO M EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train A 

Run Number 

Client 

Facility Location . gT% t-^ 1^' ^ ft* 

Source t V/r&tj. STA*4<~ 

U«IC 

Operator 4jjSS).V>y 

Slack Ola. - InT - •'" 

Stan Time 

Barometric Prcnurt_ 

Static Prcuu«(tA)_ 

Frobe/Pltot Number^ 

Pilot Coeftielut 

Filter Boi No. ~ 

Meter Boi No. 

Orlllce Coefficient (V) 

Delta H @ 

NouloSiu/No. 

LEAK CHECKS In "B| 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

INIT. PITOT 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DATA 

•:HOMB»*:-:I: •TABS::-:. 

RINSK •:•:•»:• 

Imp Outlet TCIDl • • • •••• Floel FH 

S^MFtS 

www 

{LOCK 

TIMK 

VffltOCrtV 

|WA0 

•omitx 

MrrsftvoL 

WtKlWtKt 

VOLtlMP 

TEMPERATURE RE/ WINGS. *F ; »K**'.' 

VlMh W 

.'j'j^ajiWS1' 

I. • 

> t ' . CflMMIftaS < 

III ' ' 1 

S^MFtS 

www 

{LOCK 

TIMK 

VffltOCrtV 

|WA0 

•omitx 

MrrsftvoL 

WtKlWtKt 

VOLtlMP i.iAHii[j|,m.M 

'WFil^ff! wsmmmm 

; »K**'.' 

VlMh W 

.'j'j^ajiWS1' 

I. • 

> t ' . CflMMIftaS < 

III ' ' 1 u ,/0 ),d 'm 

i.iAHii[j|,m.M 

'WFil^ff! 

f u ({< 

; »K**'.' 

VlMh W 

.'j'j^ajiWS1' 

I. • 

> t ' . CflMMIftaS < 

III ' ' 1 

7 •^P "2.52 - 4</ t > i if? // Q E?> L\ I fi -to Ml 2 ^ 

*Y A ? 

55»..., <Q-

• 

HiiSlililljlll!^ illiiiil'iliiiiiiii il!^!:.!.i!:.!!!.l.! 
ENSRi AtCO M EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sumpling Train 

Huu Number 

(•Htm c*7/»?xx 

I'mllli)- ljr.il.ii VfijPSO. r^rc*/ —iSAS^rH 

Jimirce 

Dntc ~ 

Oucrntur _ 

Slink Dhi.-iiiT 

Sun Time 

$\u\t 'lime 

• * - i 

M)|NV 

Aim. 

JS1 (1*5 

HOT 

HMI 

i«a,ocu v 

!{|'M> 

UH4VH.V 

Mr I hit VOL 

)M;i.|M«,«t 

SuileI'rcmuret+f-) *^>/7 

l'rebt/l'llol number /fr<3>—Cf-/f~ 

Mlul Caeffleleul t?-)t?5r* 

Filler Box No. 

Mccor Uox No. 

OrlflcuCoelnelcnl (V) l.6'i'2~ 

Bull* II (ff 7 , 

NOMloSlu/No. 

XAD Tlicriuocoopte 

lui|l Outlet TO ID: 

LEAK CIIKCKS III "llg 

. / £ l„. CFM g'^- S INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

_ta, CFM 

"lo. CFM 

FINAL MOT 

KILTER DATA 

::NDMni»:;:l:::

:

:

;

tAite;:-: 

<.A1> Sltl'l'B 

\m UVII 

Sl'^CK 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F 

'^jffiijiiiy 

(OO 

too 

-57 -

rib 

HOo.t o I HSS. o 

SI 

' l ^tllJ M 

Or nl 

•:-:OJ-:-

H 

14 

Flutl Purge Hole 

Fliml FH 

1. 

IL 12, 

2Ji 2 2 

JeA. i i 3 £ 

. L5". 

2ko ik: UK. T 

T 

5^ 4 £ -

3 : Tll i LQ2. •Mt -

l&jT _±6_ 32 

/iT 7 

_20 2s7 T5T 

I T : 175" Ori 

— 

To 331 J t 4 

4^ 2 £ 

M i s 

sThe 3 -

m. JO. 

3S: 

4 f -

1 "Li s 

X L 1 1 2 

2.D 2.0 

52! fe6 

-Uek. 

s 

-4 fc J33 -

M 3 

118 , 

i 

I X Jt&e. 

2 L O 2 k EE 
< 

m 

cn 

o 

o 

N> 

CO 

00 

ENSR j Ac COM 

SaniutliiK Trufn 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Hut) Number 

Client 

l"«i;IHl)' Local.mi 

Source _ 

))«!« t 

Opiiratur 

Slittk OU.- Iii. 

S(urt Time 

SlupTimc 

Ml} A UuvumvlrK I'njssurc 

filiiUc l'rtisur« {H-f 

QA, yt&Ut Filler Box No. 

FnuWMkit Number ft\{?Jtf --Ar 

l'itot Coefficient n. 

LEAK CHECKS III 

INITIAL VACj^j 

MID VAC. 

CFM 

CFM 

3J4 

Meter Uoi No. 

Orlflce Coellklrat IV) 

Delta II® 

Novele SUc/No. 

XAU Thcnnaconnlc ID: 

£2. 

F1NAL VAC. i(f ~ln . CFM 0 ffi3jT 

^ -^FINA L PITOT '—'i\ 

FILTER DATA 

•:-SILICABBt?! 

lAdin * 

IOINI 

« LIX h. 

IIMII 

V«l,0t'UV 

H HP 

btliii^fiiwc 

OKII UT 

MEIhHXIl, 

UiltudUnKc 

4.AS ML ITH 

VOI UMI 

n* 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. °F '^"1 , 

"VAdqplK, 

mm rt* JWJTI !; ;ir;:.! r. v..*;.T^-T.y:?!i ffl" lAdin * 

IOINI 

« LIX h. 

IIMII 

V«l,0t'UV 

H HP 

btliii^fiiwc 

OKII UT 

MEIhHXIl, 

UiltudUnKc 

4.AS ML ITH 

VOI UMI 

n* mm 

.... 

iHFilttlit* 

'^"1 , 

"VAdqplK, 

mm rt* JWJTI !; ;ir;:.! r. v..*;.T^-T.y:?!i ffl" lAdin * 

IOINI 

« LIX h. 

IIMII 

V«l,0t'UV 

H HP 

btliii^fiiwc 

OKII UT 

MEIhHXIl, 

UiltudUnKc 

4.AS ML ITH 

VOI UMI 

n* mm 

.... 

iHFilttlit* HjiiliMiigiii 

'^"1 , 

"VAdqplK, 

mm rt* JWJTI !; ;ir;:.! r. v..*;.T^-T.y:?!i ffl" 

•7 U.8 //V- / / f ff/ 

? f) .,7 in hi tl<e if?— II 

ffi W (if /;•*-

G* 1 }\% VI it 

illHilll|iIt?llf£lHll^Sl1lifii: i-j-ijij; -lii-i-i. iiil;ii!ii;iti iiiiiiiiiiiijifl iiiiliiliiiiiiijjiiii •illllUliiililliilil 

Or 

:ck>a:-

•at 

*»»'•:• 

n 

Floil Puree Hale 
ENSR 

Appendix C 

Method calibrations, Verifications, and Certifications 

Reference 

S^JOBef»6\Dnyi*Per(oi 

Tesl Repcxtdoc 

2006 

rmanceTesftReport»nyx2006 

VES 00238 
ENSR AECOM 

D R Y GA S METE R CALIBRATIO N 

Meter Box No.: 80754 

Check one 

Annual Cattration Recalibration 

Date: 3/14/2008 

Operator James Ruckdeschel 

Barometric Pressure: 28.55 (in Ha) 

Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 13.47 (InHg) 

Manufacturer: 

Data Recervea7Placed in service: 

Serial Na: 

AnrJetson NUTECH 

Pre 1990 

80754 

Pretest Leak Checks 

AJowabla Actual 

Positive 0 0.00 

(at 5-7tn.H,P) In. HjOpermrn. 

Negative 0 0.000 

(at 3fn.Hg) cfm cftn 

DRY SAS METER DATA CRITICAL ORIFICE DATA 

AH 

(InrtP) 

Time 

(min) 

Volume Term > Critical 

Orifice 

Serial # 

IC Orifice 

Cafibrarton 

Actual 

Vacuum 

On Ho) 

Ambient Temperature 

AH 

(InrtP) 

Time 

(min) 

Inrosl Final Total 

eft 

Initial Final 

Critical 

Orifice 

Serial # 

IC Orifice 

Cafibrarton 

Actual 

Vacuum 

On Ho) 

AH tntjal Final Average 

(InrtP) 

Time 

(min) 

Inrosl Final Total 

eft °F 

Critical 

Orifice 

Serial # Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

On Ho) "y •F 

0.24 20 677.300 683.170 S.870 69 70 48 0225 15 68 68 68 

0.91 16 691.800 700.156 8.356 74 74 52 0.427 IS 69 73 71 

130 15 711.600 722.613 11.013 76 79 63 0362 15 73 74 74 

330 10 733.800 744390 10.790 81 83 76 0.831 15 72 73 73 

CORRECTED VOLUME 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Vm (stilt") 

Critical 

Orifice 

Vcr<sMf(^) 

ORY GAS METER 

CALIBRATION 

' FACTOR V 

DRY GAS METER 

CALIBRATION 

FACTOR AHO 

5387 5.591 1.001 -O.006 1.727 -O.104 

7.899 7.936 1.005 0.00 1.829 -0.003 

10.353 10^120 1.006 0.00 1.748 -0.083 

10.124 10581 1.016 0.01 2.022 0.19 

| Avg.Y 1.007 \ | Avg. AH O 1.832 | 

Notes: 1) For valid lest rasuts, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 iaHgg^eaierfjtian tha Theoretic^ 

2) The Criticsl Ori&ce Coefficient. IC, must be entered in EngBsh units, (fl)«3-(oeg RJ^.9((ln.Hg)>(fnin)). 

3) The rniramum number of sample volume requlinsperonTicalsScubicfeet. 

4) For Castration Factor Y. the ratio ol the iBacing of the caJihalion melwto 

5) 1^ OrrBce teBiraft^ Factw 

acceptable tolerance of Individual values from the average Is ±0.2. 

Bal.TCID# Fluke RTD 213103! Inlet ID#: 80754-IN Outlet ID#: 80754-OUT 

Ret. Source Ref,°F •F A *F a 

An*. Air 65 66 -1 66 1 

Hot water 106 106 0 104 -2 

Potentiometer Calibration 

Low 501= SO 

Mid 450 °F 450 

High . 950 f 952 

Notes: 1)HotWatertobeintherangeof 104-122"F. 

2) Tolerance allowed for all thermocouple inolvidual readings: * 5.4 °F 

3) Tolerance allowed for all potentiometer indhirjual readings :±2*F 

/> + — 

' ' V '-+46 0 »'(«r) 

VES 
ENSR AECOM 

D R Y GA S METE R CALIBRATIO N 

Meter Box No.: 80645 

Check one; 

Annual CaBbrabon Recalibration 

Date: 12/27/2005 

Operator: Ryan Bums 

Barometric Pressure: 2930 P> W) 

Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 1352 On Hg) 

Anderson NUTECH 

Pretest Leek Checks 

AaowaUe Actual 

Positive 0 0.00 

(at 5-Tin.HiP) m.HcOt^rnin. 

Negative 0 0.000 

(at 3'n.Hg) cfm cfm 

Date Flocave^P laced in service: 

Serial Na: 

ORY GAS METER DATA CRITICAL ORIFICE DATA 

AH 

rnHjp) 

Time 

(nvn) 

VoUne Tom 0 Critical 

Orifice 

Serial* 

K" Orifice 

CaaVallon 

Coelfioent 

Actual 

Vacuum 

(nHg) 

Ambient Ternperatuje 

AH 

rnHjp) 

Time 

(nvn) 

Initial 

(ft3) 

Final 

(K3) 

Total 

Pf) 

Initial Final 

Critical 

Orifice 

Serial* 

K" Orifice 

CaaVallon 

Coelfioent 

Actual 

Vacuum 

(nHg) 

Final Average AH 

rnHjp) 

Time 

(nvn) 

Initial 

(ft3) 

Final 

(K3) 

Total 

Pf) •p •E 

Critical 

Orifice 

Serial* 

K" Orifice 

CaaVallon 

Coelfioent 

Actual 

Vacuum 

(nHg) "e •F 

0.26 20 826300 832.327 5.827 81 81 40 0525 15 68 68 68 

059 15 811.800 819.950 8.150 83 83 52 0.427 15 68 68 68 

1.80 15 777.400 788205 10.805 80 80 63 0.562 15 68 68 68 

4.00 10 857.400 868.228 10.828 80 80 76 0331 15 68 68 68 

CORRECTED VOLUME 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Vm (staff) 

Critical 

Orifice 

Ver (std tr1) 

DRV GAS METER 

CALIBRATION 

FACTOR Y 

ORY GAS METER 

CALIBRATION 

FACTOR AH*) 

5.609 5.782 1.031 •0.001 1.750 -0.131 

7330 8.223 1.050 0.02 1.853 -0.028 

10.459 10.82S 1.035 .030 1344 0.063 

10339 10.667 1.012 -0.02 1.977 0.10 

| Avg. V 1.032~1 | Avg. AHO 1.881 | 

Notes: 11 For vaM test results, BIB Actual Vacuum should be1 tn2in. Hg greater than the Theoretical CtitMVacuim straw 

2) The Critical Orifice Coefficient, IC. must be entered in English unis, (lt)»3'(deg R>Xi.5/((inJ1g)-(min)). 

3) The mriirrun number of sampto volume required por orrfico is 5 cufjic foot. 

4) f^CaJeifa6an Factor Y, the ratio of ttiera 

5) For Orifice Calibration Factor AH*), the orifice clffeienba) pressure in Inches of ry> that equates to 0.75 cfm of air at 68 F and 29.92 inches of Hg, 

acceptable tolerance of Individual values Irom the average is *(X2. 

Dry Gas Meier Thermocouple Calibration 

Ref.TCID* 2131035 Inlet IO*: 80645-IN Quest 10*: 80645-OUT 

Ref. Source Ref.'F "F a •F A 

Amb.Aif 68 68 0 68 0 

Hot Water 112 112 0 111 -1 

Potentiometer Calibration 

Low 50 °F 50 

Mid 450 "F 449 

High 950"F 948 

Notes: 1> Hoi Waterto t» in the range of 104 -122 "F. 

2) Tolerance aikmed tor aB IherrtiocoupfB Individual readings: ± 5.4 *F 

3) Tolerance allowed for all potentiometer individual readings: ± 2 *F 

= r pfi Y =• 

• U») 

VES 
ENSR AECOM 

D R Y GA S METE R CALIBRATIO N 

Meter Box No.: 60184 

Check-one: 

Annual Calibration Recalibration 

Date: 1207/2005 

Operator Ryan Bums 

Barometric Pressure: 2930 On Ha) 

Theoretical Critical Vacuum: ia92 C<nHg) 

Anderson NUTECH 

Pretest Leek Checks 

Afcwabto Actual 

Positive 0 0.00 

(at 5-7*1. tfeO) jruHsOpermin. 

Negative 0 0.000 

(at 3m. Hg) cfm dm 

Dato Rece*vod/P1at^ in servica: 

Serial No.: 

DRY OAS METER DATA CRITICAL ORIFICE DATA 

AH 

IJnHrO) 

Time 

(min) 

Volume Temp Critical 

Orrfrce 

Serial* 

IC Orifice 

Calibration 

Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

GnHg) 

Ambient Temperature 

AH 

IJnHrO) 

Time 

(min) 

Iritis) 

flf) 

final 

(ft3) 

Total 

(ft3) 

Ma! Fatal 

Critical 

Orrfrce 

Serial* 

IC Orifice 

Calibration 

Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

GnHg) 

AH Initial Final Average 

IJnHrO) 

Time 

(min) 

Iritis) 

flf) 

final 

(ft3) 

Total 

(ft3) •p °F 

Critical 

Orrfrce 

Serial* 

IC Orifice 

Calibration 

Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

GnHg) •p •F •* 

0.26 20 103.300 109.115 5.815 78 79 40 0225 15 68 68 68 

0.99 15 83300 91.385 8.085 75 76 52 0.427 15 68 68 68 

1.80 15 161.700 172.468 10.768 82 83 63 0362 15 68 68 68 

4.00 10 134.000 144.631 10.631 83 84 76 0.831 15 68 68 68 

CORRECTED VOLUME 

Dry Gas Critical DRY GAS METER DRY SAS METER 

Meter Orifice CALIBRATION CALIBRATION 

Vm(stdft>) Ver (std ft5

) FACTOR V FACTOR AHe 

5.623 5.782 1.028 -0.010 1.750 . •0.131 

7.876 8223 1.044 0.01 1.853 -0.028 

10.375 10.825 1.043 0X0 1.944 0.063 

10280 10.667 1.038 0.00 1.977 0.10 

\ Avg. Y 1.038~1 | Avg. AH*? 1.881 1 

Notes: 1) For valid tost resuKs, tno Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 in. Hg graatartftan trie Tneoretical Critical Vacuum shown above. 

2) Tha Critical Orifice Coefficient. K, must be entered In English unis, pWldoo Hyvj.HifruHgrirmn)). 

3) The minirnurn number of sample volunie required per entice is 5 ctrbicfeeL 

4) For CaBwation Factor Y. the ratto of the reaolrigottraicaaWBlion meter to tf» 

5) For Orifice Caflibiation Factor AHG, the orifice Differential pressure in inches of Hfi that equates to 0.75 cfm of sir at 66 F and 29.92 fetches of Hg. 

acceptable tolerance of InrXwioual values from tlie average Is* OA 

Dry Gas Meter Thermocouple Calibration 

Ref. TC ID* 2131035 Inlet IO*: 80184-IN Outlet ID*: 80184OUT 

Ref. Source Ref.°F °F A *F A 

Amb. Air 68 68 0 63 0 

Hot Water 111 111 0 111 0 

PotanSometer Cafibration 

Low SOT 50 

Mid 450 °F 450 

Ugh 950 "F 951 

Notes: 1) Hot Waterto ba in Iho range ot 104-122 °F. 

2) Tolerance alowed for al therrnocouple individual readings: ± 5.* *F 

3) Tolersnce afowed for al potentiometer etdividual readings: ± 2 *F 

r°. + v . w , = i7.»(y.) 7 - i -

VES 
ENSRI AECO M SAMPLE PROBE CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

TYPE "S* PITOT TUBE ASSEMBLY AND NOZZLE 

PROBED: ENS RRID42I3! ins Omtoa CflfJOO. I0SB22S00 

M5-4-A MM ****** rmvmvm'-a M5-4-A 

hi a/Haw 

• / 3159 273.48 34 274 1 2122 373.3 214 374 03 '450.0 505.3 451 506 0.1 

MS4-A 32.59 273.46 34 274 1 212.1 3712 214 374 0-3 450.0 605.3 4S1 sot- 0.1 

32.60 273.48 34 274 1 212.0 373.1 214 374 0.3 450.0 5055 451 sos 0.1 

32.59 273.48 34 274 1 212.1 3712 214 374 0.3 450.0 505.3 451 506 0.1 

Level and Perpendfcular 

Obstruction No 

a, (-10°S a,S+10") 

Oj (-1Cf*S Oj,S +10") 

B, (-5°s B,S+5°) 

8* (-ffs 6,5 +S*> 

7 

e 

z * ATanYM 0.12S") 

W = ATane(*s 0.03125') 

D, (3f16s D,S 3/T) 

A 

A/20, (1.05 £ P//D.S 1.5) 

04 

0375 

0.925 

dawmkilnttTUMn o*a**te 2. 

EMI Y>TJHt PfcO 

2) IharrneeosvptototM MP*» 

1J Riot tnt fa pab*t*mWi do* 

>y*-

>air 

1„1 l«IV.J =' 

|Oat* Rooarved and ptacad in 5*mfc8. 

fCurttton of Probe wtteftpte^towrAn: 

JOrVCfCCtkKk 

It cortfy th* W Typ* S pM tOMrprote CU._ 

RECONDITIONED (dtctem) 

PtNsanrwl (SlgnaS*»vOaW) T&aro Lftadar iSfcgniitirt/Dato) 

Jcki^AssurarKMHaWoc^ Vc*m» * Stationary $omc*3p9dfo MOtods. 

VES 00238 
ENSR I AECO M SAMPLE PROBE CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

TYPE "S" PtTOTTUBE ASSEMBLY AND NOZZLE 

M E 

PROBE Ih 

MS-4-B 

PROBE Ih ENsn rrro j?i»ic35 onwga cn ooo. »soS20o OrMOt CM OOO. O0CO2220O 

MS-4-B In A* ******* 

PROBE Ih 

MS-4-B 

Y. 30*2006 32-67 27352 34 274 1 212£ 210 372 -0.3 450.0 505.3 446 503 -0.4 

32.67 27352 34 274 i 212£ 373.3 210 372 -03 450.0 505.3 447 504 -0.3 

32.67 27352 35 . 275 1 2122 3733 210 372 -OJ 4$ao 505J 447 504 -OJ 

SMnaseicPneewajr &S& — . 3&S7 27352 34 274 1 2122 373J3 210 372 -0.3 450.0 505.3 447 503 •0.4 

Level end Perpendicular 

Obstruction 

Demged 

a, (-1Cf>s o^s + IO") 

Oj (-10°S CfeS+10") 

8, (-5°* 8,S+5°) 

8, (-5°S B,S +5") 

r 

e 

z = ATany(*s 0.125-) 

W * ATan6(*I 0L03125T 

D, (3/16 S 0,3! 3/8T 

A 

A/20, (1.05a: PVD,^ 1.5) 

3 ± > 

T»T_»a«mptAj FRSI1 

b) PIW aid tapeteMtfan cfci 

>3rT 

»3.(r 

lCoraHon ot Probe placed h Mtvlea; 

kkfVOC Check 

ICompletanets . 

MEW RECONDITIONED (tircfeon.) 

Ma*rit and«f ifiplt^ 

[CwWtedby: Fred San»«o^/03-lS-aoqg 

PsrsonoaJ (S^nMatM/OaM) Team Lea^(SVyiaJijrWDa») 

VES 00239 
ENSR AECOM SAMPLE PROBE CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

TYPE "S" PITOT TUBE ASSEMBLY AND NOZZLE 

• _.»K swoos. 32.18 27X25 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 444 502 -0.7 

MS-5-F 32.18 273J5 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 •0.4 4S0.O S0S.3 443 501 •OS 

""""ST— 32.18 273.25 33 274 0 2113 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 443 501 OA 

* >• »" . ' • 32.18 27125 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 443 502 .-0.7 

. ~~~

:

t:: - J~^V 

Leva) And PoipencSeular 

Obctrucfion 

Damaged 

a, {-10°s q,s + 10*) 

0* (-10* S OjS* 10") 

B, (-5°s 8,s +5*) 

Bj <-5*S BjS + S*) 

T 

e 

2 = ATaniks 0.125") 

W = ATane(*a:0.03125-) 

D| (3/16 S D,S 3/8-) 

A 

A/20t (1.05S PVD.S 15) 

NO 

No 

««tomMnflT thM Calcutta Z. 

,

:

 oS-rr:"r. v-i- ^ T .V",-:*- |y^3h' . ^-i' ft r -^ f • 

3+3 

B H I Q 3 B 

M.vdiopKB«i*iDnflit Y 

•CondUori a Probe tYimptaovdhMnteo: 

Oft/GO Chert 

ComptManes _X__ 

wwtfly tot «w Type 8 pIM ubtVpntw 1D*_ 

Rt=CONOmOt«~D (circle ore) 

RattoraMarass 

blT^andrbrapptal^Oes^ 

Pereonnel {S^mknOale) Team Leador (SJgnature/O**) 

U nnsitici^ cdtetla iw anlsclaled 

EPAS0CVR-MD3BC. Sepumberl994 

NOTES: 
ENSR Calibrator: Ryan Bums Reference Thremometer ID: PVM CCL0501S2417 

Date: 3/6/2006 

Last Impinger Thermocouple Calibration 2006 

I Thermocouple Reference Difference (+/- 2°) Thermocouple Reference Difference (•*£2°) 

LI-2 Hot 212 212 0 U-21 Hot 211 211 0 LI-2 

Cold 1 33 32 1 

U-21 

Cold 33 32 1 

Manufacturer. Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer. Anderson NUTECH 

Serial NOJ Serial No.: 

Date receivedWaced in service: Pre 1990 Date receiveoVplaced in service: Pre 1990 

L M Hot 211 211 I O U-22 Hot 213 212 1 L M 

Cold 33 33 I 0 

U-22 

Cold 35 33 2 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer 

Serial No.: Serial No: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed h service: Pre 1990 

U-G Hot 0 U-23 Hot 211 212 -1 U-G 

Cold 0 

U-23 

Cold 35 33 2 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer: Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date reeled/placed In service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

U-7 Hot 212 212 0 U-24 Hot 0 U-7 

Cold 33 32 1 

U-24 

Cold 0 

Manufacturer. Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

u-s Hot 212 212 0 U-25 Hot 212 212 0 u-s 

Cold 34 33 1 

U-25 

Cold 33 32 1 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

L W Hot 211 212 -1 U-26 Hot 214 212 2 L W 

Cold 33 33 0 

U-26 

Cold 35 34 1 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial Na: 

Date recetvedtotaced in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

U-10 Hot 212 212 0 H-27 Hot 210 212 -2 U-10 

Cold 32 32 0 

H-27 

Cold 34 33 1 

Manufacturer Manufacturer. Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date receivedWaced in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

U-11 

Hot 0 U-28 Hot 212 212 0 

U-11 

Cold 0 

U-28 

Cold 33 33 0 

Manufacturer ' Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC •1 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-12 Hot 211 212 -1 U-29 Hot 212 212 0 LI-12 

Cold 32 32 0 

U-29 

Cold 33 33 0 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

U-13 Hot 213 212 1 H-5 Hot 213 212 1 U-13 

Cold 33 33 0 

H-5 

Cold 34 33 1 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service'. Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-20 Hot 211 211 0 U-14 Hot 211 211 0 LI-20 

Cold 34 33 1 

U-14 

Cold 32 33 -1 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTECH Manufacturer. Anderson NUTECH 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

J 
ENSR AECO M 

cumx FradSMguadofca MnmlManorMW: RufcaftTOaisioas 

Fitter Box Calibritkxi 

Hot BA #1 Hot Box Ml 

Manufacturer AndwsonriUibuH 

StMHai WA 

^mc*todbtK*dbi«anfc* PM1095 

tanutacajren Anderson NUibUH 

MfWHcu WA 

Maracatadtotar^lhaaraiat PraWSS 

Calibration Dote: IG-ftb-K ^Bfibratton Data: ife^aorOS 

AmbJont Hot Anbiant Hot 

mm MM TllllwWlW M «r " 72 9*8 

—a— 346 c4afT«np*afum 71 

0 •mpOB**ne*flDt»«-3J 1 

Hotfi 0X«2 HotBox #12 

UawhKturan Anderson NUTECH 

paw wMtiwdfphcad n—wfc» Pr»i«95 

tonutactuten Ardarscn NUTECH 

SmMNoJl WA 

Jataractfcwltra^fcaan**: PrtlWS 

imitation Date: I 15-f*b-06 ^IbraUon DakK 1G-Feb-«6 

1 Ambient Hot Arabiant Hot 

MmncaTamMtahaa* 1 6B 2*8 RM4TMKaTampcimM 70 

Ae*jarT«<KMn*unM | TO 2*7 Vdutt Tafnyaralu— 71 247 

2 r<nn» DAMMM (tat •••a •1 •1 

Hot BOX <S Hot B SX 613 

Uantfacturor: Anootjon NUTECH MlniiaCaJW: AixterW NUTECH 

SeWNoj WA 

16-FatHS fixation Data: 16-F«b46 

Ambient He* Ambient I Hot 

Mmnc* T*rnpMfcma 69 •••«r W«nnoi Tutp wrmma • 07 j 2*8 HctoeiTiiV—— 60 AW MualTamparaum 67 I 3*6 

r«n^CMaraK*fioi.«*-2) 0 0 TampDBannc* paL<a4-2} 0 | 0 

Hote Hot Box 614 

Manutacvw: Anderson NUTECH Msntfacfcnr. And»r»cn NUTECH 

seNNoj WA 

r^raoMwVrAc^hMfwIcK PmlftBS 

Calibration Date: UTibration Date: 16-f« •b-06 

Umm Tampanami 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Umm Tampanam Tampanami Tl 244 WarancaTewipaiaiw** 66 247 

71 acs 

Tamp DRaranca (tai n-*-a) 

70 2*7 • 

T«me OHmnca 0DL« 0 1 Tamp DRaranca (tai n-*-a) -2 0 

Hot Box «S Hot Box «15 

Uanufactrer: Anderson NUltCH laantfacbran Anderson NUTECH 

SarWHoj WA 

[^roMft>teadta**vfca: Pm1995 

Vibration Datoe l6-F*O-06 Miration Data: 15-ftb-oe 

Ambient ( Hot 

MmmTMiiMraiii 

wcuilTcnkpfokm 

tamp ORaranc* dot • •<) 

Ambient I Hot 

66 | 2S1 MmmTMiiMraiii 

wcuilTcnkpfokm 

tamp ORaranc* dot • •<) 

66 2*7 

68 | K2 

MmmTMiiMraiii 

wcuilTcnkpfokm 

tamp ORaranc* dot • •<) 

66 247 

0 ( -1 

MmmTMiiMraiii 

wcuilTcnkpfokm 

tamp ORaranc* dot • •<) 2 1 0 Hot Box #6 Hot Box «6 

Marufactxen Serial No: 

r^r*cihid**K»tltoa»r*jc« 

Anderson NUTECH 

WA Pl»1995 

Uwufacfirer. Anderson NUTECH S«MN0J WA D«MrK«*«dfe*^ha*nrfca: Pr»1995 

Calibration Dear 1SM « Calibration Date: 17-£eb-06 

Mmrn>T«n9*munw 

taa^Tmp^naum 

Ambient Hot Ambiant t Hot 

Mmrn>T«n9*munw 

taa^Tmp^naum 

Mmrn>T«n9*munw 69 245 Mntct Teavatteea 71 24T 

taa^Tmp^naum 1| - «5 4d^ToapiMUJM 

rawORwaraltoL***) et 341 

Mmrn>T«n9*munw 

taa^Tmp^naum 

•1 0 

4d^ToapiMUJM 

rawORwaraltoL***) 2 0 

Hot SoxtT Hot Box #17 

ManufactUTon Anderson NUlfcCH 

SarUNo: NM 

0&r*c-tt*dtil*xd\j<**** PralflPS 

lAanufacaren Anderson NO ifcOH 

5afafNr>J WA DataracahwitoMwatfataafvie*: PralMS 

CalibrationDale: 1 16-Fab-06 Catenation Dank: le-FetHK 

AfSujf TtftlpanlUn* 

Ambtant Hot FWMM« Tamp«ut*» Ambient Hot 

AfSujf TtftlpanlUn* 

71 246 FWMM« Tamp«ut*» 69 MS 

AfSujf TtftlpanlUn TtftlpanlUn* 7J 250 Actual TampaHtUM 70 247 

0 -a r«np rjnaiane* (M.» W| •1 -2 

Hot Box «8 Hotl ox 618 

Mtnttfacturer Anderson NUTECH 

SaraJI*}j WA 

aaiaraHlvadAik^lneinfca: Pr*19« __ 

WantaOMr. AndanooNUTECH 

stxvttu WA 

3*1* rieeUdWwJ *> »»rvo>-- Pro 1695 

Vibration Date WfecHX, Vibration Date-. 1S-Feb-06 

FWannca Ttxr^arArM 

Actual Tstrtperaua* 

Ambient Hot Am Went Hot 

FWannca Ttxr^arArM 

Actual Tstrtperaua* 

FWannca Ttxr^arArM 70 24* Urnnn T«rap«nrh*a5 72 247 

Actual Tstrtperaua* 71 246 Actual TwnpanouM 70 240 

FWannca Ttxr^arArM 

Actual Tstrtperaua* 

-i •2 Tamp Ufww«c« !tel.»e 4-2) 2 -1 

Hot Box f9 Hot Box #19 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUituH 

Sari* No.: WA 

Otfamnamttriacatflncanta _ B»IMS 

Uanujacturen Anderson NUrtCH 

SivtHNo- WA 

Calibration Da)*: .C-Feb-06 CMrbratlon Data: 16-FatHM 

Batawoca Twywirw 

*<^T«rrifwam» 

Ambient Hot Ambfent 1 Hot Batawoca Twywirw 

*<^T«rrifwam» 

69 249 70 j 244 Batawoca Twywirw 

*<^T«rrifwam» 70 2S1 MSUTanxMnrww 71 24* 

Batawoca Twywirw 

*<^T«rrifwam» 

-1 -2 r*irv> onmnca (teL a 

-1 1 0 Hot tax flu HotBoxf21 

Marxifacturer: Amtetson Ntr/1 fcCH 

Sar^No- WA 

Uanufacturer: Anderson NU i tCH 

5«UNo- WA Dataro«rfcw*nto^to9*nfca: Pro 1995 

Calibwtion Data: 16-f«6-06 Calibration Dote: 17-Fer>0$ 

MatameTeraptmurtt 

Ambient Hot Ambiem Hot 

MatameTeraptmurt MatameTeraptmurtt 73 247 Mannea Tamptratunw 68 2*1 

72 2*6 ftetu^Tarnpanturv* 6» 2*3 

MatameTeraptmurtt 

1 1 TarrvDiRsnirn (tot» -1 -2 1 
ENSR AECOM 

XAD Thermocouple Calibrations - 2006 

date 3/13/2006 

BP: 29. 1 

Reference Thermometer ID#: 

Manufacture: 

Date placed in Service: 

Calibrator: James Ruckdeschel 

Ambient Temp (F): 6 3 

Fluke Digital RTD 2131035 

Fluke 

Pre 1980 

| Ice Bath Ambient || 

Thermocouple 

ID# 

Reference 

Temp 

XAD 

Temp 

Temp 

Difference 

ToI = +-2 F 

Reference 

Temp 

XAD 

Temp 

Temp | 

Difference j 

TOI = +-2F | 

XAD-1 3 3 3 2 -1 6 2 6 2 0 

XAD-2 3 3 3 3 0 6 2 6 3 1 

XAD-3 3 3 3 1 - 2 6 2 6 2 0 

XAD-4 3 1 3 1 0 6 3 6 3 0 

XAD-5 3 1 3 3 2 6 3 6 3 0 

XAD-6 3 2 3 2 0 6 3 6 3 o 

XAD-7 3 2 3 2 0 6 4 6 4 0 

XAD-8 3 2 3 2 0 6 5 6 3 

XAD-9 0 ° 

XAD-10 3 2 3 2 0 6 6 6 4 - 2 

XAD-11 0 0 

XAD-12 0 I 0 
ENS R 

Appendix D 

Stack Configuration, Sampling Port and Traverse Point Locations 

Se|*ember2006 

S:\_JO»2006Wny)^e!foimara^ 

Tesi Report.doc 

VES 00239! 
GROUND LEVEL 

ENSR 

ENSR CORPORATION 

6601 WrkvtlU Rood 

E M Syroeun. M«w York 13057 

AECOM 

"FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNI I 3 

VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS 

Sound. tlUnoto 

« M M Kf. I OBOitD BY: 

WW 

reOJECT HUMGOb _ 

10002-017 1 OF 1 

VES 002396 
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

(Particulate Traverse - Circular Stack) 

FACILTY: 

STACK IDENTIRCATION: 

STACK DIAMETER: 

SAMPLING LOCATIONS: 

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS 

AS SPECIFIED BY EPA METHOD 1: 

Onyx Environmental Services 

Unit 3 

39 inches 

14.95 diameters downstream 

9.85 diameters upstream 

16 

NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS SAMPLED: 16 

Traverse Point Percent of Stack Diameter 

Number From Inside Wall 

Distance in Inches 

From Inside Wall* 

1 3.2 1.2 

2 10.5 4.1 

3 19.4 7.6 

4 32.3 12.6 

5 67.7 26.4 

6 80.6 31.4 

7 89.5 34.9 

8 96.8 37.8 

* For stacks with an inside diameter (ID) of 24 inches or less, no traverse point may be located within 

0.5 inches of the inside wall. For stacks with an ID greater man 24 inches, no traverse point may be 

located within 1.0 inches of the inside wall. Any point not meeting the criteria shall be adjusted. 
ENSR 

Appendix E 

Laboratory Data 

jo»2006\Dr^erkKmanceTe^ 

TestRepoitdoc 

September2006 
ENS R AECO M 

" 574.772^345 f 97S.7T2,jgjg <uwv«SRsr.s*eem CL-m 

ENS R Ai r Toxic s TS P Laborator y 

Analytica l Repor t 

Client : Jef f Gorma n 

ENSR 

6601 KirkvffleRoad 

E. Syracuse, N Y 13057 

Clien t ID : 10002-01 7 

Laborator y ID : 06-06 7 Dat e Received : 5/12/0 6 

All work contained in this report has been done in accordance with laboratory standard operating procedures. ENSR's Air 

Toxics TSP Laboratory follows methodologies based upon standard EPA/NIOSH/OSHA Methods. Data contained herein 

should be considered accurate and complete to the best of our knowledge. This report cannot be duplicated in part wimout 

the written permission of ENSR. 

Arthur Carpetuto7 

Laboratory Analyst 

ENSR Air Toxics TSP Laboratory 

Date 

NYSDOH / NELAC # 11631 

page 1 of 6 

VES 00239S 
ENSR i \<.>. ( 

I 

Method 5 Exposed Filter Data Sheet 

Project Manager; 

Projaol Nam: 

Project Niariber: 

Analyala Method: 

Jeff Gorman 

Onyx 

10002-017 

ESS Pypn Hrlwri 

Balance Usadi 

Start Frtdau 05rt2/oe 16:34 46 72 AC 

Wt.1 Monday osnsm 19:30 36 72 AC 

WL2 Tuasdav 09/16/06 9:26 37 72 AC 

Wt.J 

Wt, 4 

CD 

CO 

s, 

a> 

IPI1 

204 

IPI1 I B Mat 

204 01/09/06 0.4083 G3832 N/A LAB FILTER BLANK 90 mm 0.4092 0.4094 0.0002 okbtrWl, 0.4093 . 0.0003 

204 :D1/O9/0B 0.4067 Q3B25 05/09/06 PRETEST-MS-FILTER 90 mm 0.4101 0.4102 0.0001 okbvWt, 0.4102 0.0035 

204 01/00/06 0.4057 G3B27 05/10/06 U3-M6-F-R1 90 mm 0.4066 0.4088 0.0002 okbvWt, 0.4087 0.0030 

204 01/09/06 0.4054 03624 05/10/06 U3-MS-F-R2 SO mm 0.4136 0.4134 0.0002 okbvWt. 0.4136 0.0061 

204 :01/09/06 0.4054 33828 05/11/06 U3-M5-F-R3 Mmm 0.4126 0.4124 0.0002 ekbyWI. 0.4125 0.0071 

• % 

HiarTyim {ByflBriffft Talton OMOI 

< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

1. Cotta WBIBM tolorence «(. O.OOOSg 0/ lout wolghl less tore weight between two consecutive weWitnga ar average weight. 

2. FHiais rouil ba weighed vdllt Itw proper condMwii (RH • 25 . 50 % md RT « S0-7e dag I) 

3. Fltleta must pa propoily co\4Momil (84 hour desiccation; Fwtlier CoodlMng 16 hours). 

4. Condieonlno tor oven method; Oven dried at 105 deg 0 fo 2-3 tnuti; Futther condlllertlng ft 8 Iwura. 

5. Total grams below « equal to 4)005 (LOL) Is presented as .0003, 
Method S Front Half Acetone Probe Rinse Data Sheet 

Jaft Gorman 

Balance Uaad: Matter 3 

Proiact Manager; 

Project Name: 

Project Nurnber: 

Analyala Method: 

Onv» 

10002-017 

32 

D l i n mm M i f ) - ^ r . ; ,,, , 

fc)Vb''.i:':'r. 

43<t 06/11/08 115.1680 32 N/A LAB ACETONE BLANK - 1 50 nfiBTf i iTISS n •Efl W nTM^a»TTi TM 

434 05/11/06 66.2956 39 05709/06 PRETEST-M6-ACETONE 52 50 66.2992 86.2986 0.0004 okbvWt. 66.2690 0.0034 

434 05/11/06 103.5347 04 05/10/06 U3-M5-AR-R1 63 50 103.6383 103.5377 0.0006 103.5378 0.0001 okbvWt. 103.6378 0.0031 

434 05/11/06 101.0475 120 05/10/08 U3-M5-AR-R2 111 50 101.0642 101.0640 , 0.0002 okbvWt. 101,0641 0.0066 

434 05/11/06 105.3632 154 06711/06 1/3-M5-AR-R3 95 50 105.3691 105.3669 0.0002 OkbvWt 105.3890 0,0058 

Acetone Manufacturer/lot No.: Flsher/OS^a^ 

ACTtonoRinta« 25rTfl3 NriCU - (60 ntfs lotfl.1 

1. Ofltta Wtjighl wlorsnca *h 0.00050 of loiot wu'ighl leas late Wright balwoon two consecutive watghtfrtBi « avarefla wafghl. 

2. ftaakara musl to wolQhod with iho propor conditjotis (RH • 25 • 30 % ind RT • 59-78 deg 0 

3. Boston mutl bo property conditioned (24 hour dealecatlon; Furthar Conditioning % 0 hours). 

4. Natural evaporation Method - Evaporate lo oVynow atroom lamotratura under * hood / watch glass covar 

5. Hoal Application » Undor a hood nnd watch gfait ovar lampla, apply hut below tha boiling point of sampta unlit evaporaitd to 2S mla; than follow a tap 4 (abovaj for (imelnkip, portion. 

<S. Total grama bulow or aqua! lo .0005 (LDt) is presentod »« 0003. 
PROJECT NARRATIVE 

Maxxam Analytics (Bnrttagton ON) 

Maxxam Job ft A644469 

Oust: ENSRIiiternatiosal 

C&rt Project: 10092-017-017 ONYX 

t SAMPLE RECEIPT/ANALYSIS 

a) Sample Listing 

AtVrrnm CKent Date Date • Date Date 

ID Sample Q> Sampled Received Prepped Rmt 

Mercury IB via EPA Method 29 

isms TJ3-M29-RB 06705/10 06705/12 06705/17 06705/18 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06705/10 06705/12 06/05/17 06705/18 

L99S30 U3-M29-R2 06705/10 06705/12 06705/17 06705/18 

L99S31 U3-M29-R3 06705/10 06705/12 06705/17 06705/18 

Mercury 2B via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06705/10 06705/12 06705/16 06705/16 

L99829 TJ3-M29-R1 06705/10 06705/12 06705/16 06705/16 

L99830 TJ3-M29-R2 067D5/1O 06705/12 06/05/16 06705/16 

L99831 U3-M29-K3 06705/10 06705/12 06705/16 06705/16 

Mercury 3A via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

L99829 U3-M294U 06705/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

L99830 U3-M29412 06/05/10 06705/12 06/05/15 06705/16 

L99831 XJ3-M294Q 06705/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

Mercury 3B via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M294© 06705/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

L99829 U3-M294U 06705/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06705/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

L99831 TJ3-M29-R3 06705/10 06705/12 06705/15 06705/16 

Mercury 3C via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06705/10 06705/12 06705/16 06705/18 

L99829 TJ3-M29-R1 06705/10 06705/12 06/05/16 06705/18 

L99830 06705/10 06705/12 06705/16 06705/18 

L99831 U3-M29-S3 06705/10 06705/12 06705/16 06705/18 

Metals in Air (Combined) via EPA Method29 (ICP/MS) 

L99828 TJ3-M29-RB 06705/10 06705/12 06705/17 06705/19 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06705/10 06705/12 06705717 06705/19 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06705/10 06705/12 06705717 06/05/19 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06705/10 06/05/12 06705/17 06705/19 

Ran Date is defined as die date of injection of the last calibration slanrlard (12 honrsoT less) 

prior to tne sajnples analyzed wnliinriatnmD^quence. Thexd^fl^timeofau%ration 

injection titatdefmes die TOT date is alwa^w^ 

b) Shipping Problems: none encountered 

c) Dccomentation Problems: none encountered 

JH Pagel of 2 
IL SAMPLE PREP: 

No problems encountered 

OL SAMPLE ANALYSIS: 

Sec also comments within the appropriate Certificate of Analysis 

a) HoMTin^aUwithfarecorrm»en^ 

b) Instinineat Calibration; aU wulnncuiUrul limits 

c) Quality Control: All applicable QC meets control criteria, except where otherwise noted. 

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the tenns and conditions of the 

contract, both ttxhm'calry and for other than the conditions detailed above. 

Li addition, I certify, that to die best of nrylowwledge and belief; tne data as tepc ^ are 

true and acenrate. Release of tbe data contained in fins data package has been authorized by 

the cognizant laboratory official or his/her designee, as verified by this signature. 

MaryJH Page 2 of 2 
2 . DAT A SUMMAR Y 

Certificat e o f Analysi s -

Sample analyte result 

Method blank result 

LCS Results with' % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike data with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike Duplicate data with % Recoveries 

Surrogate recoveries 
tVI a *2 Si m . 

Driven by service and Science 

-vvw^maxxatennaljites^coinYour Project*: 10002-017-017 

Site: ONYX 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601KkkviileRd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

MAXXAM JOB #: A 644469 

Received: 2006/05/12,12:00 

Sample Matrix: Filter 

# Samples Received: 4 

Analyses Quantity 

Date 

Entractcd 

Date 

Analyzed Laboratory Method 

MeOod 

RicfclCIMAi 

Mercury IB -Air (Fitter*Acetone) by CVAA $ 

Menus in Air (Combined) by ICP/MS « 

2006/05/17 2006/05/18 SOP ING 111 . 

2006705/17 2006705/19 SOP ING 108/109 

EPA CFR PTM 29 

EPASW846-602Q 

Sample Matrix: Impinger Solution 

# Samples Received: 4 

Analyses Quantity 

Date 

Extracted 

Date 

Analyzed Laboratory Method 

Method 

Mercury 3C in Afr (HCI Impinger) by CVAA 0 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) by CVAA 6 

Moony 2B io AjrCHN03/H202 nop) by CVAA 0 

Mc«cuiy3BioAir(KMiiO4/B2S04)byCVAA$ 

4 2006705/16 2006705/18 SOP ING 111 

4 200670S/1S 2006/05/16 SOP ING 111 

4 2006705/16 2006705/16 SOP ING III 

4 200*05/15 2006*5/16 SOP ING 111 

EPACFRPTM29 

EPACFRPTM-29 

EPACFRPTM29 

EPACFRFIM29 

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Burlington 

YTICS INC 

MARY-ANNE JOHNSON, B.A, BSc. 

Project Manager 

MAJ/maj 

end. 

Page I of 11 

6740 Campobello Road. Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6268 Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 00240! 
t >».»>» lyric* mc 

Driven ta- service mid Selene 

wwr.m«i»n»»»»»aytte-<=», i 

Your Project* 10002-017-017 

"Site: ONYX 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

660lKirkvilleRd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006705/20 

nranWCAJ E o p ANALYSI S 

-2-

VaHdatedby: 

Total cover pages: 2 

8740 Campobello Road. Mississauga, Ontario Canada LSN 2L8 

Page2of11 

Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-6777 

VES 002406 
Maxxam Job £A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

Driven by service and Science 

OiSR International 

Cfient Project fr. 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

MERCURY BY COLO VAPOUR AA (FILTER) 

Maxxam ID L93828 L99829 L9S829 L99830 LS9831 

SampSnq Dale 2006705110 2006705/10 2006/05/10 2006V05i10 2006/05/10 

JnHs U3-M29-RB U3-M29-R1 U3-M2S-R1 

' Lab-Duo 

U3-M29-K2 U3-M23-R3 RDL CtC Batch HDL 

[Total Merctny-1B I ug ,| tW~ ND ND 0.10 0.27 {9.03 | 972395 |o.o7 

WD = Not detected 

|RDL = Reportable Detection Umlt 

(QC Batch = QuaBty Cootrol Batch 

Page 3 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-317-5700 Tdl tree:S00-563-626e Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 00240 
Maxxam Job #:A644469 

Report Date: 2006V05720 

" ' Driven Cy service gad Science 

ENSR Intamabbnat 

Cfient Project #: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (FILTER) 

Maxxam ID L99828 L99829 L99829 L99830 139831 

Samplinq Data 2006705/10 2006705/10 2006705710 2006705/10 2006705/10 

inlts U3-M2S-RB U3-M29-R1 U3-M23-R1 

Lab-Oup 

U3-M23-R2 U3-M29-R3 RDL SC Batch MDL 

Total Arsenic (As) «S 0.76 &29 9.62 249 946 0.4O. 972012 0.40 

Total BeryBum (Be) U3 NO ND ND ND ND D.10 972012 0.10 

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 034 0.68 0.71 138 276 3.10 972012 0-10 

Total Chiomium (Cr) ug 1.01 17.7 19,8 29.0 553 130 972012 030 

Total'Laad (Pb) ug

 :

- 2.70 23.9 . . "24.1 22.3 40.6 972012 

ND=Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection limit 

QC Batch = QuaHy Contra)'Batch 

Page 4 of 11 

6740 Carnpobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll frae:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

VES 
JBrtven by service and Science 

Yvww.maxacamanalyticS'Coin 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

MERCURY BY COLD VAPOUR AA (IMPINGER SOLUTION) 

Maxxam ID L99828 LB9829 L99829 

SarisGnsj Date 2006705/10 2006705/10 2006705/10 

Jnits U3-M2S-RB RDL U3-M29-R1 U3-M29-R1 

UUU D 

RDL 3C Batch MDL 

Total Meicury-2B US ND 03 74.7 • 75.4 13 970091 031 

Total Mercur/-3A ug ND 931 338 3.40 9.13 970045 0.06 

Total Metcuy-38 ug 0.04 0.O2 10.7 10-7 03 970066 0.05 

Total Meroury-3C ug ND 3.05 8.55 838 971322 0.05 

MD = Not detected 

F^=Reportable Oetedm Unit 

QC Batch = QuaBy Control Batch 

Teti • 1t.oZ 

Maxxam ID L99830 L99831 

SamrJina Date 2006705/10 2006/05/10 

Units U3-M29-R2 RDL U3-M23-R3 RQL 2C Batch HDL 

Total Mercury-2B "9 104 1.7 78.6 13 970091 031 

Total Merctny-3A ug 129 9.02 126 9.02 970045 0.05 

Total Metcury-3B ug 739 925 13fi 9.05 970066 035 

Total Mercury-3C ug 735 925 7.70 925 971322 035 

RDL - Reportable Detection Limit 

QC Batch = QuaSty Control Batch 

IVI st yCyisi m . 

Maxxam Job #:A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

Page 5 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Tel! free:800-563-6265 Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 00240S 
IVI axoc s m . 

f^^r Anjtlytlcl »*»< 

Maxxam Job #: A644469 

Report Date: 2006705/20 

Driven by service a>ul Science 

ENSR International 

CHert Project*: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

DaTytlcs.com 

Test Summary 

Maxxam ID L99828 Collected 2006705/10 

Sample ID U34«29-RB Shipped 

Matrix Filter Received 2006705/12 

Test Description tnstrumentaflon Batch Prepared Analyzed1 

. Artafvtt 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Imoinqert bv CVAA CVAA 971322 2006705/16 200S7D5/18 FFS 

Mercury. 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) bvCVAA CVAA 970045 2006705/15 2006705/16 FFS • 

Mercury 28 in AHHN03/H2Q2 Imp) bv CVA CVAA 970091 2006/05/16 2006705/16 FFS 

Mercury 3B in Air(KMrO4/rlZS04)byCVA CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 2006705/16 FFS 

Mercury IB ^Air (FJter+Acetcne) bv CVAA CVAA 972395 2006/05/17 2006705/18 FFS 

Metals in Air /Combined) bv ICP/MS .- tCPI/MS 972012 2006/05/17 2006705/19 N R 

Maxxam ID L99829 Collected 2006705/10 

Sample ID U3-M29-R1 Shipped 

Matrix Fitter Received 2006705/12 

Test Description Insb lanenlation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C In Air (HCI Impinger) bv CVAA CVAA 971322 2006705/16 2006705/18 FFS 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) bv CVAA CVAA 970045 2006705715 2006705/16 FFS . 

Mercury 2B In Alr(HNO3/H202lmp) bvCVA CVAA 970091 2006705/16 2006705/16 • FFS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04l bv CVA CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 2003/05/16 FFS . • • 

Mercury 1B-Alr (FBtar+Acetone) bv CVAA CVAA 972395 2006705/17 •2006705/18 ,•- FFS • 

Metals in Air (Combined) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 972012 2006705/17 -2006705/19 N R 

Maxxam ID L99829Dup Collected 2006705/10 

Sample ID U3-M294M • Shipped -

Matrix Filter Received 2008705/12 

Test Description instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercurv3CmAtrfHaimrtrKiertrjvCVAA CVAA 971322 2006705/16 2006705/18 -FFS 

Mercury 3A In Air (HN03 Rinse) by CVAA CVAA 970045 2006/05/15 2006705/16 • .FFS 

Mercury 28 in Air/HN03/H202 Imp) by CVA CVAA 970091 2006705/16 2006705/16 FFS • 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04) nv CVA CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 -2006705/16 " FFS 

Mercury 1B -Air (Riter+Acetone) bv CVAA CVAA 972395 2O06705/17 2006705/18 FFS 

Metals in Air (Combtrted) bv tCP/MS 1CP1/MS 972012 2006705717 2006705/19 N R 

Maxxam ID 139830 Collected 2006705/10 

Sample ID U3-M2&R2 Shipped 

Matrix Fiter Received 2006/05/12 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Impinger) bv CVAA CVAA 971322 2006705716 2006705/18 FFS 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) bv CVAA CVAA 970045 2006705/15 2006105/16 FFS 

Mercury 2B In AWHN03/H202 fens) bv CVA CVAA 970091 2006705716 2006/05/16 FFS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04l bvCVA CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 2006705/16 FFS 

Mercury IB -Air ffHter+Acetone) bv CVAA CVAA 972395 2006705/17 2006/05/18 • FFS 

Metals h Air (Combined) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 972012 2006705/17 2006/05/19 N R 

t 

i Page 6 of 11 

j 

i 

8740 Camppbelto Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Tpll free;800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

VES 00241C 
WA a ^? a m . 

I Analytic* Inc 

Maxxam Job #:A644469 

Report Date: 200670500 

Dl L\Jbgp g4j ouil ScfCnve 

ENSR International 

Clfciit Project*: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Summary 

Maxxam IO 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

L99831 

U3-M29-R3 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006705/10 

2006/05/12 

Test Description tnsb inner ilutlon Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HQ ImDlrwertbvCVAA CVAA 971322 '2006/05/16 2006705/18 1+8 

Mercury 3A m Air (HN03 RSnsel bvCVAA CVAA 970045 2006705/15 2006/05/16 FFS 

Mercury 2B In AWHN03/H2Q2 lmp> bv CVA CVAA 970091 " 2006705716 2006705/16 FFS 

Mercury 3B in ArriKMn04/H2SD4) bv CVA CVAA 970066 . 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 FFS 

Mercury IB -Air fFBter+Acetonei bv CVAA CVAA 972395 2006/05/17 2006705/18 FFS 

Metals kl Air (Combiners) bvJCP/MS ICP1/MS 972012- 2006705/17 2006705/19 N R 

Page7of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:80fr5r)3-6266 Far 905-817-5777 

VES 00241' 
ENSR International 

Client Project ft 10002-017-047 

Project narrie:C>NYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Driven by service and Scf ate* 

www.maxxauttftnslyTlcs^coin 

Maxxam Job £A644469 

Report Date: 2006705/20 

GENERAL COMMENTS 

ICPttS:Po£tfgestfcmdup&^ 

•I Results rotate only to the Items tested. 

Page 8 of 11 

6740 Campobello.Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada LSN2L8 Tel: 805-817-5700 Tollfree:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

VES 00241 
tVIcEl 

f ^ am . «rivw.naxxam«»nlytScxueoB» 

. . Driven by service and Science 

fcPJSK international 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Projects 10002-017-017 

P.O.*: 

Project name: ONYX 

Quality Assurance Report 

Maxxam Job Number. GA644469 

QA/QC • 

NumHt QCTvpe Parameter 

Date 

Analyzed 

ww/mm/dd Value ^Recovery Units QC Limits 

970045 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

(I39829) ' Total Mercury-3A ' 200670506 0.00, ROL=0.13 102 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

OUP 039829) Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 0.O0, RDL=0.13 105 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank . Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 0.11, RDL=0.01 106 ug 90-110 

Spiked Blank OUP Total Mercury-3A 2006705/16 0.11.RDL=O.01 107 ug 90-110 

Method Blank Total Mercur/-3A 2006/05/16 ND. RDL=031 ug 

RPO Total Mercury-3A 2006705/16 03 % 20 

970066 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

85-11S (159829) Total Mercury-3B 2006705/16 03, RDL=0.5 10$ ug 85-11S 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP 85-115 (199829) Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 03. RDL=03 107 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Mercury-3B 2006705/16 035. RDL=0.05 110 ug 90-110 

Spiked Blank OUP Total Mercury-3B 2006705/16 034,RDL=0.05 108 ug 90-110 

Method Blank Total Mercury-3B 2006705/16 ND. RDL=035 : ug 

RPD Total Mercury-3B 2006705/16 0.05 % 20 

970091 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Mercury-2B 2006/05/16 03. RDL=1.6 100 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

•UP (L99829) Total Mercury-28 200670506 03. RDL=1.6 95 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Mercury-2B 2006/05/16 0.11, RDL=O-01 107 ug 90-11B 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Mercury-2B 2006705/16 0.11, RDL=O.01 109 ug 90-110 

Melhod Blank Total Marcury-2B 2008/05/16 ND, RDL=031 ug 

20 RPD Total Mereurjr-2B 2006705/16 0.9 % 20 

971322 FFS MATRIX SPK E 

85-115 (L99S29) Total Mercury-3C 2006705/18 034,RDL=035 108 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

85-115. DUP 0-99829) Total Mercury-3C 2006705718 0.54, RDL=0.25 106 ug 85-115. 

Spiked Blank Total Mercury-3C 2006705/18 0.51,RDL=O.05 102 ug. 90-110 

Spiked Blank OUP Total Mercury-3C 2006705/18 0.52, RDL=0.05 103 ug- 90-1-10 

Method Blank Total Mercury-3C 2006705/18 ND. RDL=035 ug 

20 RPD Total Mercury-3C 2006705/18 0.4 % 20 

972012 N_R MATRIX SPIKE 

70-130 (139829) Total Arsenic (As) 2006705/19 493. ROL=0.40 99 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

70-130 DUP (139829) Total Arsenic (As) 2006705/19 493, ROL=0.40 99 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

70-130 (139829) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006705/19 44S,ROL=0.10 89 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP0-99S29) Total Berylum (Be) 2006705/19 453. ROL=0.10 91 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

70-130 (L99829) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006705/19 263, RDL=0.10 104 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP (139829) Total Cadmium (Cd) 200670509 263,ROL=0.10 105 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPKE 

039829 70-130 ) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 523, RDL=O30 105 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(L99829) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 513, RDL=0.30 103 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 50.5, RDL=0J20 101 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPKE 

Total Lead (Pb) 

DUP(L99829) Total Lead (Pb) 2006705/19 503, RDL=0.20 101 ug 70-130 

Spiked Blank 'Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 513, RDL=0.40 103 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006705719 513, RDL=0.40 103 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Barylnjm {Be) 2006705/19 473,RDL=0.10 94 ug 85-115 

SpSced Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006705/19 47.0,RDL=0.10 94 ug 85-115 

Page 9 of 11 

6740 Campobelto Road, Mississauga. Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toil free:800-563-6266 Fax 905-817-5777 

VES 00241 
WAsty^ylsk m 

Analytic* Inc 

QAAQC 

Batch 

Num InSt QCTvpe Parameter 

Data 

Analyzed 

vwv/mm/dd Value % Recovery Units QC Units 

972012 N R Spiked Blank Total Caomium(Cd) 2006705719 253. RDL-0.10 103 ug 85-115 

SpSced Blank OUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 20rj8/05719 253. RDL=0.10 103 ug 85-115 

Spliced Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006705719 533. RDL=0.30 106 «g 85-115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium <Cr) 2006705/19 53.5. RDL=0.30 107 ug 85-115 

Spaced Blank Total Lead (Pb) - 2006705/19 51.0. RDL=0.20 102 ug 85-115 

• Spiced Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 52.0. RDL=020 10* ug 85-115 

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006705/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006705/19 NO, RDL=0.40 ug 

Method Blank Total Berylum (Be) 2006705/19 ND. RDL=0.10 . , ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Berylum (Be) 2006/05/19 NO, RDL=0.10 ug 

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006)05/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Gxirnium (Cd) 2006705/19 ND, ROL=0.10 . ug 

Method Btank TrjtalC»iroinu»n<Cr) 2006705/19 NO. RDL=030 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Oiromium (Cr) 2006705/19 ND, RDC=O30 . ug 

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2006705/19 ND. RDL=0.20 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2006705/19 ND, RDLSO20 ug 

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2006705719 33 % 20 

Total Ber/Sum (Be) 2006705/19 NC % 20 

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05/19 3.9 % 20 

Total Chromlom (Cr) 2006/05/19 115 % 20 

Total Lead (Pb) 2006705/19 0.7 % 20 

972395 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99S29) Total Mercury-1B 2006705/18 O.30.ROL=O.03 99 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP (139829) Total Mercury-1B 2006/05/18 030. RDL=0.03 100 ug 65-115 

Spiked Blank ; Total Mercury-IB 2006705/18 031FRDL=0.03 103 ug 90^110 

Spiked Blank OUP Total Mercur/-1B 2006705718 031, RDL=0.03 103 ug 90-11Q 

Method Blank Total Mercury-1B 2006705/18 ND, RDL=0.O3 ug 

RPD Total Mercurv-IB 2006/05/18 NC % . 20 

SU3 = Not detected 

MC=Non-calculable 

RPD = Relative Percent Difference 

SPIKE = Fortified sample 

I 

Page 10 of 11 

6740 CampobeHo Road. Mississau^ Cfltario Canada .LSN 2L8 Tel: 305-817-5700 Trtlfiw:800^63-62t» -Fax: 005-817-5777 

Drh icn £>]' service an d Scicn ce 

ENSR International 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project ft 10002-017-017 

P.O.ft 

Project name: ONYX 

Quality Assurance Report (Confinued) 

Maxxam Job Number: GA644469 

VES 002414 
Validatio n Signatur e Pag e 

Maxxam Job #: A644469 

The analytical data and ail QC contained in mis report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). 

<^M\r 

FRANK MO, B-Sc.,Inorganic Lab. Manager 

Maxxam has procedures to place ta guard against uiiyiupause of the elecntmie signage and lave a»e rcqmrad 'ligaalories*. as per we lion S.10.I of 

rSO/IEC 1TO25;2085(E), signing the reports. SCC aad CABAL haw approved aw rq^ngpra^aDddecmmicrcpmionra t 

Page 11 of 11 

6740 Camppbello Road, Mfesissauga, Ontario Canada. L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 
Section I: Sample Inventory Report 

Dat e Received : 

Projec t No. : 

Projec t Name : 

6722/2006 

27803 

10002-017 

Lab. Sample ID Client Sample ID Component DD 

001 

002 

003 

004 

005 

006 

007 

U3-M23A-XAD-R1 

U3-M23A-PF-R1 

U3-M23A-XAD-R2 

U3-M23A-PF-R2 

U3-M23A-XAD-R3 

U3-M23A-PF-R3 

U3-M23A-XAD—FB 

BH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

XAD 

FHACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

BH ACE/MeCE/TOL 

XAD 

FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

BH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

XAD 

FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

BH/FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

XAD 

Smpinvgnmm5.rp1 

Project 27803 Project 2 of 466 

VES 002416 
SECTION n 

Project 27803 

Project 3 of 466 

VES 002417 
< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

r o 

4 * 

Method Blank 

Matrix: MM5 QC Batch No.: 8120 Lab Sample: 0-MB001 

Sample Size: Sample Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-225: NA 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLd

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0 879 93 8 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 0.802 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 88.8 40 - 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 1 69 130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 85,3 40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.43 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 77.3 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-flxCDD ND 1.55 13C-0CDP w , L 59.8 ,40 •< 135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 1.82 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 82.1 40-135 

OCDD ND 6 95 130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF

 h 

• 77,9, ; 40 - 135" 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.08 130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 95.9 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 145 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF , 79.6 40 -135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.33 13C-0CDF 23.2 40 - 135 H 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0 587 PS 3701-2,3',7,8-TCDn , , 101 " '7Q-130 i' ' 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.469 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 99.6 70- 130 

2,3A6.7,8-HxCDF ND 0 552 130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxpDD 95,2- 70-130, ' 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.707 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 88.0 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0 386 130-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpODIF i '73,1 I i 70- 130 , 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.846 AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 83.3 40 -135 

DCDF ND 7 46 if'l ' 'r-iYellVi;

Ti>,;

 ;v'!

.Ms! 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD ND 0.879 TEQ (Min-Max): 0.00386 - 2.87 

Total PeCDO ND 0 669 -MS:',&h' ^ v vS I. 

^ ,TiMV,\.*M :>"/'".'- • J ' J' '.'•f!'..',..i.w Total HxCDD ND 1.55 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD ND 1.82 b Estimated maximum posstbleicortcentration.il • 

Total TCDF ND 1.08 q. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF ND 1.39 d. Lower control limit -upper control limit. t- :

, 

Total HxCDF ND 0.566 e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF), 

Total HpCDF : 0 386 

Analyst: RAS Approved By. William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Metho d 0023 A 

Project 27803 Project 4 of 466 
OPR Results Metho d 0023 A 

Matrix: MM5 QC Batch No.: 8120 Lab Sample: 0-OPR001 

Sample Size: Sample Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-225: NA 

Analyte Spike Cone. Cone. (ng/mL) OPR Limits Labeled Standard %R LCL-TJCL 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 2.50 2 48 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 12.5 12.6 8.75 - 16.25 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 82.3 40 - 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 12 5 12 8 8 75 - 16 25 13C-1.2.3.6 7,8-HjiCpD ,^79 1 40-135 ^ 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 12.5 14.0 8.75 - 16.25 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 77.4 40 - 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 12 5 14 0 8 75-1625 13C-OCDD , .

 f

 , 

1

 62,9 \ ' 40- 135 . , 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 12.5 12.0 8.75 -16.25 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 78.1 40- 135 

OCDD 25.0 24 7 17 5-32 5 13C-l>2,3,7,8-PeCDFv

, r ,,75.4 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 2.50 2.40 1.75-3.25 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 83.5 40 - 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 12 5 12 5 8 75 - 16 25 13C-l,2,3J4,6,7,8-HpCDF 78 7 40 - 135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 12.5 11.8 8.75 - 16.25 13C-OCDF 27.2 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 12 5 12 3 8 75 -16 25 AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCPF m 90,7 40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 12.5 13.9 8.75 -16.25 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 12 5 13 6 8 75 - 16 25 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 12.5 12.9 8.75 -16.25 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 12 5 12 8 8 75 - 16 25 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 12.5 8.92 8.75 -16.25 

OCDF 25,0 24.7 17 5-32 5 •H J 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-200615:11 

< 

m 

co 

§ Project 27803 Project 5 of 466 

ro 
Sample 10: U3-M23A-XAD-R 1 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratorv Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 19-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-001 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Dates Analyzed DB-225: 27-Jun-06 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPCb Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLd

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 3 64 IS 13C-2,3,7,*8-TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 17.0 J 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 88.7 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 19 1 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 89.2 -40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 46.1 s 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

13C-OCDP 4 „ 

96.7 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 37 0 

13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

13C-OCDP 4 „ ^'135 . 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 190 13C-2.3.7.8-TCDF 88.3 40-135 

OCDD 236 l3C-l,2t3,7,8-PeCDF- ,

 1 V 80> 40 -135 ; 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 29.5 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 97.0 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 35 5 ?f' '. '.. '.V':

;;:':' 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 92.7 4Q -135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 65.4 13C-OCDF 83.4 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 36 0 1 yy^rm- ES 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDpr

'

 J L ' •' 86 1 siilisiiviiillli i 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 31.9 , J,D 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 91.4 70-130 • 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 43 8 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 70 - 130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 10.3 J 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 85.9 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 78 1 B 13C-J,2,3,4,7,8,9'HpCDF i t 177.9 7P'W9 l r

 „ 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 8.10 J AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 95.2 40 -135 

OCDF 20 4 :

 j yj: 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD 1180 TEQ (Min-Max): 71.4-75,0 

Total PeCDD 869 :'S,v; . *.:>.-.:V.J.** • hfivii ' 

Total HxCDD 1470 a. Sample specific eatimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD 412 b. Estimated maximum passible concentration; n:-. 

Total TCDF 1080 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF 800 'y^isyy^'. . d. Lower control limtf -upper control limit. . f t'- •• '•i„--;j-!.":'--T-i i:.rj

'-Jfe;;::-.': V . 4 

Total HxCDF 391 395 R P e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF 112 ^y&'^y. 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

o 

o 

|£ Project 27803 Project 6 of 466 
Sample ID: TJ3-M23A-PF-R 1 <~$*\ Metho d 0023 A 

Client Data S«mRl«Pstt MPW«torv $m 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Col lected: 19-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

LabSampte: 27803-002 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-JTO-06 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed DB-225: 

22-Jun-06 

22-Jun-06 

NA • 

Analyte Cone. (pg/SampIe) DL

 a EMPCb Qualifiers Labeled Standard % R LCL-UCL d Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1.18 ' 91.5 ,40 r 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1.38 I3C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 92.8 40 -135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.76 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOO 89:4 40 -135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.33 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 83.1 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxQDD ND 2.53 13C-OCDD '86.7 40.H35- ' 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 2.52 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 85.3 40-135 

OCDD 10.8 • J 130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF

 1 82.3 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.27 13C- 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 97.8 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 1 51 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF , 80,9 40 r 135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.38 13C-OCDF 69.1 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0 923 ES 3701-2,3,7,8-TCDp 1

 94.4, 70-130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.737 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 93.9 70-130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0 868 130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 90,7 70 T 130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 1.11 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 87.4 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND l 1.29 l3C-l,2,3,4,7I8,9-HpCDF •7?4 70 - 13Q 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 1.11 AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 93.7 40-135 

OCDF ND 5.02 "". r^T" r 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 c 

Total TCDD ND 1.18 TEQ (Min-Max): 0.0108 - 3.95 

Total PeCDD ND 1 38 

Total HxCDD ND 3.34 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD 1 77 b. Estimated maximum posjibte-pgncentratioti. 

Total TCDF ND 1.27 c. Melhod detection limit. 

Total PeCDF ND 144 d. Lower control Hmit .-; upper control limit.; . 

A _ 

Total HxCDF ND 0.890 e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF ND 149 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-200615:11 

Project 27803 Project 7 of 466 
Sairipleip; U3-M23A-XAD--R 2 

TB'ssy;-,*! 

- t, t Metho d 0023 A 

Client Data Samnle Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 20-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-003 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Dale Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received; 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Dates Analyzed DB-225: 27-Jun-06 

Analyte Cone, (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPCb Qualifiers Labeled Standard % R LCL-UCLd

 Ouaiiflers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 3 44 IS l3C-2,3,7,8-TCDb ' 1 ' 90V7 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 17.6 . J l3C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 96.2 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 168 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDt> 90_,fl 40 - 135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34.7 J 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 89.1 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 27J • 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 175 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 84.8 40 -135 

OCDD 175 40- 135 * v 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 32.8 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 96.2 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 412 ISC-l^.SAe^.S-HpCDF 834 ilMlllliillllC . 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 70,2 13C-OCDF 59.8 40 -135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 33 0 E S 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD ' 1 99,4 -

1

 70-U301 v ' 1 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 31.7 J,D 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 89.2 70-130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 41 8 13CM,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 92.3. 70- 130 * ' ' 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 11.6 J 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 92.3 70 - 130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 66 8 13CM,2,3,4,7,°>HPCDF > , 83.2r 70 -P 0 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 5.21 j A§ 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 99.2 40-135 

OCDF 148 .V^:

"-; : Y'y^%y0»§^!^y0 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD 1210 TEQ (Min-Max): 75.0 - 75.0 

Total PeCDD S48 •V'

:

.',:i.:''^:':i w' +t> ' *, I 

Total HxCDD 1330 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD 381 b. Estimated maximum possible concontraticn. 

Total TCDF 1350 c. Method detection limit. 

TotalPeCDE; >>>V •• ,862 D .1; d. Lower control limit - upper control limit: . « 

Total HxCDF 390 D e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF 98.0 ; .Vi'SOG , *::':X*f".! 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 278Q3 Project 8 of 466 
< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

ro 

ro 

co 

Sample ID: U3-M23A-PF-R 2 . y0M0r thod6023 A 

Client Data Sample P»ta riUbowtvry But* 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 20-Jutl-06 

Time CoUected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-004 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed DB-22S: 

22-Jun-06 

22-Jun-06 

NA 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPCb Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLd Oualiflers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 121 IS 13q-2,3,7,8-TCDD 95.2 t4o'*m ,1: 

• ' • • » • 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 3.26 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 101 40 -135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD • ND 2 63 l3G-l,2,3,6,7,a-HxCpD < 40 r 135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.23 13C- 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 83.0 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 2.41 13C-QCDTJ <• x i 88.2 49*135 r 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 4.12 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 92.6 40-135 

OCDD ND 6 33 13C-l,2,3,7(8-PeCD]r? , ,8&9, i 40 -.135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.951 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 101 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 3 44 1301,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF «»40 - 135 -

J i 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 3.14 13C-OCDF 61.5 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0 684 E S 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD' '•ins 1

 tO -1301

 h 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.546 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 99.4 70-130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0643 13C-l,2,3,4 7,8-HxCpD"' i 95.0 , 70-^130 , 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.823 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 88.7 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 0705 13C.l,2,3A7,^9-HpCOF\ ,/79.4 70*130 f liMlliiw?' ' 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.971 A S 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 92.8 40-135 

OCDf ND 6 38 :i"Af':J>v.^;^^ 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD ND 1.21 TEQ (Mln-Max): 0-5.74 

Total PeCDD ND 3 26 v i ••.;.-', kitf^iiSrir'i s S'f 

Total HxCDD ND 2.41 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD ND 4 12 b. Estimated maximum possibje^fojjcentrafion. 

m-\r 

Total TCDF ND 0.951 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF ND 3 28 d. Lower control limit • upper controMimiti >::

. i.i,i,:;i.'i^ii:<'*i.?;v:--

Total HxCDF ND 0.660 e. TEQ based on (19S9) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF ND 0 817 • 

Analyst: RAS 

Project 27803 

Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 9 of 466 
Sample ID: TJ3 -M23A-XAD-R 3 ; , Metho d 0023 A 

Client P«a SumnlfPfua Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 21 -Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-005 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Dates Analyzed DB-225: 

22-Jun-06 

22-Jun-06 

27-Jun-06 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPCb Qualifiers Labeled Standard % R LCL-UCLd Ouallfiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND .7,,,i.^,ii;|vi:v q'ifi- WIM »»8«*JI4«|I*W,'. 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 16.7 _ J 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 94.0 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 14 6 130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCOD 8§*7 I 4QJ-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 35.7 J 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 95.2 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 26 3 13C-QCD0 j 95(? ' 40f 135 f 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 156 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 86.6 40-135 

OCDD 141 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDP 84 3 * 40 -' 1^5 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 31.8 13C-i;2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 95.9 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 41 1 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 9Q8 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 76.2 13C-OCDF 81.0 . 40 -135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 37 8 j E S 3701-2,3,7,8-TODD 982 I 70 -130 \ 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 33.6 J,D 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 97.8 70-130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 44 9 J 130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxtfDD m. 7()t-130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 11.1 J 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 90.7 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 70 7 B 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-«[pCDF ill ! 70^130 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 7.15 J A S 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 91.1 40-135 

OCDF 13 2 J 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 c 

Total TCDD 879 899 TEQ (Min-Max): 74.6 - 78.5 

Total PeCDD 686 illiil i 

Total HxCDD 1110 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD 335 b, Estimated maximum possible cflncejitration. . !; . . • r1

 «:•.! .v.:.. ,i.. • 

Total TCDF 1310 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF 948 D d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

1 

Total HxCDF 410 D e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF 102 B 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project lQpf 466 
< 

m 

co 

o 

o 

ro 

Sample ID: TJ3-M23A-PF-R 3 ifi i 

t

 Metho d 0023A 

Client Data 

Name: 

Project: 

Date Collected: 

Time CoUected: 

ENSR 

10002-017 

21-Jun-06 

Sample P»t» 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL EMPC° Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 

1,2 3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD ND 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HXCDD ND 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 

OCDD 101 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF ND 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF ND 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDF ND 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF ND 

OCDF ND 

140 

3.83 

213 

1.81 • 

2.53 

1.15 

3 00 

2.74 

0 641 

0.512 

0 603 

0.771 

0 819 

0.602 

3 84 

Totals 

Total TCDD 

TotaliPeCDD 

Total HxCDD 

Total HpCDD 

Total TCDF 

Total PeCDF * 

Total HxCDF 

Total HpCDF 

ND 

3.35 

: ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

. ND 

1.40 

, 3.83 

1.15 

2.86 

0.618 

I': 

Laboratory Data 

Lab Sample: 

QC Batch No.: 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 

27803-006 

8120 

27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed DB-225: 

22-Jun-06 

22-Jun-06 

NA 

Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLa Qualifiers 

13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

iaC-l,2,3,6,7,8.Hx$}P 

13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

13C-OCDD,< J k 

13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 

13C-l,2,3,7}8-PeCDF+ 

13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

l3C-l,2,3,4,6,7,?-HpCDF 

13C-OCDF 

£§ 37Cl-2,3,7,8-XCDp , 

13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 

13C-l,2t3,4,7,8,9-HpCRF 

AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 

WK, 88.4in 1 

93.9 

&3 

95.6 

94.0 

89.7 

84J< 

99.3 

85.9 

,100 

104 

H ? 

90.4 

9 1 3 

99.0 

40-135 

40 r 135 ' "3 i 

40-135 

40„}35 

40-135 

4QV13S,.,.1 4 

40 -135 

40-135 ~ 

40 -135 

70 •» 130 

70 -130 

70- 130 * 

70 -130 

70 * 130

 1 ; 

40 -135 

Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data 

TEQ (Min-Max): 0.0101 

c. Method detection limit. 

d. Lower control limit • 

e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF), 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 11 of 466 
Sample ID: U3-M23A-XAD—F B - Metho d q023A 

Client Data $«mpl* Pftts Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 20-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-007 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 

Date Received: 

Date Extracted: 

Date Analyzed DB-225; 

22-Jun-06 

22-Jun-06 

NA 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 8 EMPCb Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLd Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.845 IS 13C-2,3,7,8-TCbD v ' '' i 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 0.844 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 89.2 40 -135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 1 38 BC-l .^^S-HxSP D 40 -135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.16 13C-i,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 80.2 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD (-.ND y - • • J-M'.% 126 

13C-OC0D r \ s. I 84,5 40- 135, 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 1.42 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 85.9 40-135 

OCDD ND 4 29 130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDE 1

 m 40-135 i. t 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.732 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 96.2 40 -135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF - ND 1 15 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 8,1,1- 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.05 13C-OCDF 59.9 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0401 Pg 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD

 1 • 95,3 70-130 11 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.320 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 96.5 70-130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0 377 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCPD 70 - 13Q 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.483 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 90.4 70 -130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ;.. ... y.£ : 0.666 130-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpOPF , 76.2 7Q-13Q , 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.918 AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 90.6 40 -135 

OCDF ND 3 70 '-\:

.:A-.;y •:'"V:^--.?Vr':^'':vi^il;!:il

:;!l 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD 

;

 'Trtfral l?s*I^TTiTV 'ii',.'. 

ND 

vW * 'y £ >;;'•'•' M'3,stt 

0.845 

•. . ':-r .-;".-'•.•••;•••'••>]•' ;:-

TEQ (Min-Max): 0 : 2.5 0 

X;Ptai.,re,SJi-J,l^i.;i "vi-vi* 

Total HxCDD ND 

U.p*4: 

1.26 a. S imple specific estimated detection limit. 

Uj'-ViWiA-iia'ivH 

Total HpCDD 1.42 . b;E slimat^maximumpossib^ 

Total TCDF ND 0.732 

'*-'t'

?

'rn:-"W~-

:• .,:,.•» - . 

c. Method detection limit, 

Total HxCDF ND 

t, ItA', ; :?v 

0.387 e.T EQ based on (1989) International Toxlo Bi lulvalent Factor s(ITEF), 

Total HpCDF . : :

.Nb'v* '':py..y^ ::;

''0^72l f:- 5?-:!:.. • 

' i^r%i y^A^^^ifsf^^i 

< Analyst: Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

m 

CO 

§ Project 27803 Project 12 pf 466 

ho 

ro 

CD 
PROJECT NARRATIVE 

Maxxam Analytics (Burlington ON) 

Maxxam Job #:A662175 

Client: ENSR International 

Client Project 10002-017-820 ONYX 

I. SAMPLE RECEIPT/ANALYSIS 

a) Sample Listing 

Maxxam Client Date Date 

ID Sample ID Sampled Received 

Metals in Air (Back Half) via EPA Method 29 

M73146 M29-RBBH 2006706721 2006706722 

M73147 M29-U3-R1 BH 2006706719 2006706722 

M73147 Dim M29-U3-R1 BH 2006706719 2006706722 

M73148 M29-U3-R2BH 2006706720 2006/06722 

M73149 M29-U3-R3 BH 2006706721 2006/06/22 

Metals in Air {Front Half) via EPA Method 29 

M73142 M29-RBFH 2006706721 2006706/22 

M73143 M29-U3-R1FH 2006706719 2006/06722 

M73143 Dup M29-U3-R1 FH 2006706/19 2006/06722 

M73144 M29-U3-R2FH 2006706720 2006/06722 

M73145 M29-U3-R3 FH 2006706721 2006/06722 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) via EPA Method 5 

M73142 M29-RBFH 2006706721 2006706722 

M73143 M29-U3-R1FH 2006706719 2006706722 

M73I44 M29-U3-R2 FH 2006706720 2006706/22 

M73145 M29-U3-R3FH 2006706721 2006706/22 

Particulates in Air (Filter) via EPA Method S ( 

M73142 M29-RBFH 2006706721 2006/06722 

M73143 M29-U3-R1FH 2006/06/19 2006706/22 

M73144 M29-U3-R2 FH 2006706720 2006706722 

M73145 M29-U3-R3FH 2006706721 2006/06722 

Run Date is defined as die date of injection ofthe last calibration standard (12 hours or less) prior to 

the samples analyzed within mat run sequence. Therefore the time of calibration injection that defines 

the mn date is always witliin 12 hours of the time of sample injection. 

b) Shipping Problems: none encountered 

c) Documentation Problems: none encountered 

II. SAMPLE PREP: . 

No problems encountered 

Date Date 

Prepped Run 

2006706729 2006706729 

2006706729 2006706729 

2006706729 2006706729 

2006706/29 2006/06/29 

2006/06729 2006/06729 

2006706/28 2006706/29 

2006/06728 2006/06729 

2006/06728 2006/06/29 

2006/06/28 2006706729 

2006/06728 2006/06/29 

2006/06727 2006/06/28 

2006706727 2006706/28 

2006706727 2006/06728 

2006706/27 2006706728 

2006706726 2006/06/26 

2006706726 2006/06726 

2006/06/26 2006706/26 

2006/06/26 2006706726 
DX SAMPLE ANALYSIS: 

See also comments within the appropriate Certificate of Analysis 

a) HoH Times: all within recommended hold times 

b) Instrument Calibration: aU within control limits 

c) Quality Control: All applicable QC meets control criteria, except where otherwise noted. 

I certify that mb data package is mc»^ and conditions of the contract, both 

technically and fer other than the conditions detailed above. 

In addition, I certify, mat to the best of my knowledge and belief, the data as reported are true and 

accurate. Release of the data contained in this data package has been authorized by the cognizant 

laboratory official or his/her designee, as verified by mis signature. 

Mary-Anne Johnson, Project Manager Date 

JUL 05 2005 
2 . DAT A SUMLVLfVR Y 

Certificate of Analysis -

Sample analyte result 

Method blank result 

LCS Results with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike data with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike Duplicate data with % Recoveries 

Surrogate recoveries 
1 0.3000 1 

araz Mtrereg pJtnj 

O 

(%> AJipnnnH ut aSire© o 

(sSnwp % S>) («) AipwmH I»a 

(oStrcrp 3ap p> 9*55 oi ytl) pjoio j 

sowSoOOCOPEtwiI 

o 

OD2a3trtfca jtnnii 

o 

(%) ftppramK i^noj V) 

O ffSZ « Kfl) wnwratajsu, TOW 

vs 

w 

woa»U!p jainj jo iqSiaM 

o 

o 

1 -0.00050 I I otowro-1 

n 

O 

d 

O 

O 

s 

o 

o *n 

o 

o o o o D o o 

(umntfn pptuuiAXXC) pairSiSM atvq jwnj 

1 

i 

£# (8) awpq «IIU jo wStSM 

o 

o 

o. 

d 

o 

eo 

S 

© 

o 

rr 

© 

o 

d 

O 

iS 

d 

o 

d 

o 

» 

d 

(uno;t|q ppanuAXCiC) pa^SuM aiea FTOiui 1 

i 

1# (8) aiojaq Jaipj JO iqSp/A 

© 

Ch 

tn 

O 

o tn 

© 

© 

O 

CM ° 

© 

o 

CV 

d 

o f> 

t*. (*> 

d 

o 

tn 

d 

i 

OA f 

d 

afoidAV ii|8|aA aid mm 

& 

1 

(urai:<pi pponoAXU) uoireaiscaa jo OJEQ 

§ 

E E 

o 

Ov 

1 

a 

E 

s 

rs 

at 

c 

00 

ao %C 

m * 

p»nss]J3qumoqri 

A657076 

c S c el 

g c 

o 
&rtven by service and Science 

www.maKxamanaIytlcs.com 

Your Projects 10002-017-820 

Site: ONYX 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601 KirkvilleRd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006709/11 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

MAXXAM JOB #: A66217S 

Received: 2006/06722,13:50 

Sample Matrix: Filter 

# Samples Received: 4 

Date Date Method 

Analyses Ouantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference 

Metals in Air (Front Half) by ICP/MS ft 4 2006/06728 2006/06/29 SOP ING 108/109 EPA SW846-6020 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (MS) 8 4 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 SOP ING 505 EPA CFR PTM 5 

Particulates in Air (Filter) 9 4 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 SOP ING 505 EPA CFR PTM 5 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse # 4 2006V09/I1 2006V09/11 

Sample Matrix: Impinger Solution 

# Samples Received: 4 

Date Date Method 

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference 

Metals in Air (Back Half) by ICP/MS % 4 2006/06729 2006/06/29 SOP ING 108/109 EPA SW846-3010A.60 

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Burlington 

MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC 

MARY-ANNE JOHNSON, BA, B.Sc. 

Project Manager 

MAJ/maj 

encl. 

.72 

Page 1 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:80O-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

VES 002431 
Ml a m 

Driven by service an d Science 

www.marxMiimMlyttcs.coin 

Your Project*: 10002-017-820 

Site: ONYX 

Attention; Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601KirkvilleRd 

East Syracuse, NY . 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006709/11 

ryRTTFICATR TM? ANALYSIS 

-2-

Validatedby: 

Total cover pages: 2 

Page 2 ot 11 

r, , - r^ri* r Tel-905-817-5700 Tdl free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

6740 Campobello Road, Missjssauga.Ontano Canada L5N2L8 Tel. 91»-»T o 

VES 002432 
- .' Driven by service and Science 

wmnnxainuiiaryncMvm 

ENSR International 

Qient Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF FILTER 

riaxxam ID M73142 M73143 M73144 M73145 

Samplinq Date 2006706721 2006/06/19 2006/06/20 2006/06/21 

Units M29-RBFH M29-U3-R1 

FH 

M29-U3-B2 

FH 

M29-U3-R3 

FH 

FIOL SC Batch MDL 

• 

Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 4.0 2.8 1.7 0.5 1001275 0.5 

Volume ml 98 57 87 56 1 1049870 1 

Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.65 1.65 1.55 0.30 1001265 0.30 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch 

Page 3 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

M a o u a m. 

' An*lytic* inc 

Maxxam Job #:A662175 

Report Date: 2006709/11 

VES 002433 
f Analytics loc 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

Driven by service and Science 

wwwjnaxxaaianalyttcs^am 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (FILTER) 

Maxxam ID M73142 M73143 M73143 M73144 M73145 

Samolinq Date 2006/06/21 2006/06/19 . 2006/06/19 2006/06/20 2006706/21 

Units M29-RBFH M29-U3-H1 

FH 

M29-U3-R1 

FH Lab-Ouo 

M29-U3-R2 

FH 

M29-U3-R3 

FH 

RDL SC Batch HDL 

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.61 5.81 6.01 457 5.62 3.40 1001008 0.40 

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 1001008 0.10 

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 0.79 9.64 11.9(1) 3.98 11.1 0.30 1001008 0.30 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

SC Batch = Quality Control Batch 

[ 1) Please refer to General Comments page for specific clarification. 

Page4of11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

VES 002434 
Driven by service and Science 

wwwjnaxxamauuUyttcs.com 

ENSR International 

CHent Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (IMPINGER SOLUTION) 

Maxxam ID M73146 M73147 M73147 M7314B M73149 

Samolinq Date 2006/06/21 2006/06/19 2006/06719 2006706/20 2006/06/21 

Jnits M29-RBBH U29-U3-R1 

BH 

M29-U3-R1 

BH Lab-Dun 

M29U3-R2 

BH 

M29-U3-R3 

BH 

RDL X Batch MDL 

Total Arsenic (As) ug ND 0.33 033 ND 051 050 1001758 050 

Total BeryMum (Be) ug NO ND ND 0.087 ND 9.050 1001758 0.050 

Total Chromium (Cr) us ND 1.06 1.02 0.66 0.84 0.15 1001758 0.15 

I ND = Not detected 

IRDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

(QC Batch = Quality Control Batch 

PageSof 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:80f>563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

M a m 

''/^Analytles Inc 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

VES 002435 
J>riven by service and Science 

www.maxj»'maxuUytlcs^com 

ENSR International 

Client Project *: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Summary 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID' 

Matrix 

M73142 

M29-RBFH 

Fitter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/D6721 

2006706722 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Anah/st 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (MS) BAL 1001275 2006706/27 2006706728 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06/26 2006706726 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 FMO 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73143 

M29-U3-R1 FH 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006706/19 

2006706/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS 1CP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006706/29 N_R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) BAL 1001275 2006/06/27 2006706728 - IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06/26 2006706/26 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 FMO 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73143Dup 

M29-U3-R1 F H 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/19 

2006X16/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006706/29 N_R I 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73144 

M29-U3-R2 F H 

filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006706720 

2006/06722 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS 1CP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06729 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (MS) BAL 1001275 2006/06727 2006706/28 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06726 2006/06726 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 FMO 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73145 

M29-U3-R3FH 

Filter 

-

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/21 

2006/06/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06729 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) BAL 1001275 2006/06727 2006706/28 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Rlter) BAL 1001265 2006/06726 2006/06726 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 FMO 

Page 6 of 11 

.6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

Maxxam . 

Maxxam Job #:A662175 

Report Date: 2006709/11 

VES 002436 
Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Report Dale: 2006/09/11 

• Driven by service and Science 

www-inaxxamaiuttycicswcom 

ENSR international 

Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Summary 

Maxxam ID M73146 

Sample ID M29-R8BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Test Description 

IMetals in Air (Back Half) bv ICP/MS 

Instrumentation Batch 

Collected 2006/06/21 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Prepared Analyzed 

Analyst 

ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 MR 

Maxxam ID M73147 

Sample ID M29-U3-R1 BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Test Description 

IMetals in Air (Back Hall) by ICP/MS 

Instrumentation Batch 

Collected 2006/06/19 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Prepared Analyzed 

Analyst 

1CP1/MS 1001758 2006706/29. 2006706729 MR 

Maxxam ID M73147 Oup 

Sample ID M29-U3-R1 BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Test Description 

IMetals in Air (Back Hall) bv ICP/MS 

Instrumentation Batch 

Collected 2006/06/19 

Shipped 

Received 2006/08/22 

Prepared Analyzed 

Analyst 

ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006706729 MR 

Test Description 

Maxxam ID M73148 

Sample 10 M29-U3-R2 BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Instrumentation Batch 

Collected 2006/06/20 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Prepared Analyzed 

Analyst 

IMetals in Air (Back Half) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06729 MR 

Maxxam ID M73149 

Sample ID M29-U3-R3BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Test Description 

IMetals in Air (Back Hall) bv ICP/MS 

Instrumentation Batch 

Collected 2006/06/21 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Prepared Analyzed 

Analyst 

ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06729 2006/06729 MR 

Page 7 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

VES 002437 
IN/l SI yC.yC Si m . Driven by sen-ice and Science 

ENSR International 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 Client Project #: 10002*017-820 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

GENERAL COMMENTS 

Results relate only to the items tested. 

Page 8 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll 1ree:S0O-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 002438 
W/\ Si yC-yC St m Driven by service and Science 

A/T ^.T^"."« 1 fcNSR International www.mju.owMiyucjxo m 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project #: 10002-O17-820 

P.O. #: 

Project name: ONYX 

Quality Assurance Report 

Maxxam Job Number: GA662175 

QA/QC 

Batch 

Numfclit QCTvpe Parameter 

Date 

Analyzed 

ww/mm/dd Value %Recoverv Units QCUrnts: 

1001008 N_R MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73143) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 49.5, ROU0.40 99 ug 70-130: 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(M73143) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 49.5, ROU0.40 99 "3 70-130:: 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73143) Total Beryllium (Be) 20OSVD6/29 48.0, RDUO.10 96 ug 70-130. 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(M73143) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006706/29 47.0. RDU0.10 94 ug 70-130> ; 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73143) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006706/29 48.5, RDL=0.30 97 ug 70 -130' 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(M73143) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 47.5, RDUO.30 95 ug 70-130 

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 485, RDU0.40 97 ug 85-- 115 . 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006706/29 49.0, RDU0.40 98 ug 85-115 • 

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 59.5, RDUO.10 119(1) ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.5, RDUO.10 117(1) ug 8S-115 

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 53.0, RDUO.30 106 ug 85.-115> 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2006706/29 53.0, RDUO.30 106 ug 85-1151 

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDU0.40 ug 

Method Blank OUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDU0.40 ug 

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDUO.10 ug 

Method Blank OUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDUO.10 ug 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND. RDUO.30 ug 

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDUO.30 ug 

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 3.4 % 20 

Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 NC % 20 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 21.2(1) % 20 

1001275 IMR Method Blank Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2006/06/28 ND, ROU0.5 mg 

1001758 N_R MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73147) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 48.5, RDUO.20 97 ug 70 -130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP (M73147) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06729 50.0, RDUO.20 100 ug 70-130' 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73147) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06729 57.5, RDU0.050 115 ug 70-130: 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP (M73147) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.5, RDU0.050 117 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73147) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 50.0. RDU0.15 100 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP (M73147) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 51.0, RDU0.15 102 ug 70 -130 

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 50.5, RDUO.20 101 ug 85- 1155 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06729 50.0, RDUO.20 100 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.5, RDU0.050 117 ug 85.- 115i 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006706/29 58.0, RDU0.050 116 ug 85-115.. 

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05729 52.0, RDUO.15 104 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06729 52.0, RDUO.15 104 ug 85-115 

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06729 ND, RDUO.20 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDUO.20 ug 

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDU0.050 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06729 ND, RDU0.050 ug 

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDUO.15 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDU0.1S ug 

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 NC % 20 

Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 NC % 20: 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06729 4.2 % 20 

NO = Not detected 

Page 9 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-S63-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 002439 
Ztrjyen by service and Science 

fcNSH international 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project*: 10002-017-620 ' 

P.O.#: 

Project name: ONYX 

Quality Assurance Report (Continued) 

Maxxam Job Number. GA662175 

NC = Non-calculable 

RPD = Relative Percent Difference 

SPIKE = Fortified sample 

1) Please refer to General Comments pa ge for specific claritication. 

Page 10 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L 8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

IVI si f^^^r Analytic* Inc 

VES 002440 
Driven by servic* anil Science 

wwwjuxxsmnal^kaxo n 

.Validation Signature Page 

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individuals). 

FRANK MO; B.Sc, Inorganic Lab. Manager 

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of die electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.102 of 

ISO/DSC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved tins reporting process and electronic report format 

IVI a Xo^a m 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Pagellofll 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:80o-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 

VES 002441 
D 

VES 002442 
Fiur 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION S 

IN THE MATTER OF; 

Veoli a ES Technica l Solutions , LLC 

7 Mobil e Avenue 

Sauget, Illinoi s 62201 

ATTENTIONS Dougla s Harris , Genera l Manager 

Request t o Provid e Information Pursuant to the Clea n Ai r Ac t 

The U.S. Environmental Protectio n Agency i s requirin g Veoli a 

ES Technica l Solutions , LLC (Veoli a or you) t o submit certai n 

informatio n about your hazardous waste incinerator s a t 7 Mobil e 

Avenue, Sauget, Illinois . Appendix B specifie s the informatio n 

tha t you must submit. You must send thi s informatio n to us 

accordin g to the schedul e i n Appendix B. 

We are issuin g thi s informatio n reques t under sectio n 114(a) 

o f the Clean Ai r Ac t (Act), 42 U.S.C . § 7414(a). Sectio n 114(a) 

authorize s the Administrato r of EPA to requir e the submission of 

information . The Administrato r has delegate d thi s authorit y to 

the Directo r of the Ai r and Radiatio n Division , Region 5. 

Veoli a owns and operates an emissio n source , thre e hazardous 

waste incinerator s a t 7 Mobile Avenue, a t it s Sauget, Illinois , 

facility . We ar e requestin g thi s informatio n t o determine 

whether your emissio n sources ar e complying wit h the Nationa l 

Emission Standards fo r Hazardous Ai r Pollutant s from Hazardous 

Waste Combustors, 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE (hereinafter, "the HWC 

MACT") and to establis h the appropriat e operatin g parameter 

limit s fo r each incinerator. 

You must send al l required, informatio n to : 

Attn : Compliance Tracker, AE-17 J 

VES 002443 
M r Enforcement and Compliance Assuranc e Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protectio n Agency 

Region 5 

77 W. Jackson Boulevard, AE-17 J 

Chicago, Illinoi s 60604 

With copie s t o Illinoi s Environmenta l Protectio n Agency: 

Ray Pilapil , Manager 

Compliance and Enforcement Sectio n Bureau of Ai r 

Illinoi s Environmental Protectio n Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue Eas t 

Springfield , Illinois , 62702 

And 

Michae l Reed, Unit Manager 

Clean Ai r Ac t Permit Program Bureau of Ai r 

Illinoi s Environmenta l Protectio n Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue Eas t 

Springfield , Illinoi s 62702 

You may conside r the informatio n confidentia l tha t you 

submit to us . You may assert a clai m of busines s confidentialit y 

f o r any portio n of the submitted informatio n under 40 C.F.R . 

Part 2, Subpart B. Appendix A specifie s the assertio n and 

substantiatio n requirements fo r busines s confidentialit y claims . 

Veoli a must submit al l requested , informatio n under an 

authorized signatur e with the followin g certification : 

I certif y under penalt y of law tha t I have examined and am 

familia r wit h the informatio n i n the enclose d documents, 

includin g al l attachments . Based on my inquir y of those 

individual s wit h primar y responsibilit y fo r obtainin g the 

information , I certif y tha t the statements and informatio n 

are , to the best, of my knowledge and belief , true and 

complete. I am aware tha t ther e ar e significan t penaltie s 

f o r knowingl y submittin g fals e statements and information , 

includin g the possibilit y o f fine s o r imprisonment pursuant 

to sectio n 113(c)(2) of the Act , and 18 U.S.C . §§ 1001 and 

1341. 

We may us e any informatio n submitte d in . respons e to thi s 

reques t i n an administrative , civil , or crimina l action . 
Thi s reques t i s no t subjec t to the Paperwork Reduction Act , 

44 U.S.C . § 3501 e t seq. , because i t seeks collectio n of 

informatio n from specifi c individual s o r entitie s as part \ o£ an 

administrativ e actio n ox investigation . To ai d i n our'electroni c 

recor d keeping efforts , pleas e provid e you r response t o thi s 

reques t fo r informatio n without staples . Paper clips , binde r 

clips , and 3-rin g binder s ar e acceptable . 

Failur e to comply full y wit h thi s reques t fo r informatio n 

may subjec t Veoli a to an enforcement actio n under sectio n 113 of 

the Act , 42 U.S.C . § 7413. 

You should direc t any question s about thi s reques t fo r 

informatio n to Charle s Hal l a t (312) 353-3443. 

Date Chery l L . Newtotff, Actin g Directo r 

A i r and Radiatio n Divisio n 

3 

VES 002445 
Appendix A 

Confidentia l Busines s Information (CBI) 

Assertio n and Substantiatio n Requirements 

A . Assertio n Requirements 

You may assert a busines s confidentialit y clai m covering al l 

o r part o f the informatio n requested i n the attache d letter , as 

provide d i n 40 C.F.R . § 2.203(b). To make a confidentialit y 

claim , submit the requested informatio n and indicat e that yo u ar e 

making a clai m of confidentiality . Any document ove r which you 

make a clai m of confidentialit y shoul d be marked by attachin g a 

cove r sheet stamped or typed wit h a legend t o indicat e the inten t 

t o clai m confidentiality . The stamped or typed legend, or othe r 

suitabl e form of notice , shoul d employ language such as "trade 

secret " o r "proprietary " o r "company confidential " and indicat e a 

date i f any when the informatio n shoul d no longe r be treate d a s 

confidential . Information covered by such a clai m wil l be| 

disclose d by the EPA onl y to the extent permitte d and by means of 

the procedure s se t fort h by Sectio n 114(c) of the Clea n Ai r Ac t 

(the Act) , and 40 C.F.R . Part 2. Allegedly.confidentia l portion s 

of otherwis e nonconfidentia l documents shoul d be clearl y 

identified . EPA wil l construe the failur e t o furnis h a 

confidentialit y clai m wit h you r respons e to the attached lette r 

as a waive r o f tha t claim , and the informatio n may be made 

availabl e t o the publi c without furthe r notic e to you . 

Pleas e segregate personnel , medica l and simila r file s from 

your responses and includ e tha t informatio n on separat e sheet(s) 

marked as "Persona l Privac y Information" give n tha t disclosur e of 

such informatio n to the genera l publi c may constitut e an invasio n 

o f privacy . 

B. Substantiatio n Requirements 

A l l confidentialit y claim s ar e subjec t to EPA verificatio n 

and must be made i n accordance wit h 40 C.F.R . § 2.208 which 

provide s i n part tha t you satisfactoril y show tha t you have taken 

reasonabl e measures t o protec t the confidentialit y of the ' 

informatio n and tha t you inten d t o continu e t o do so ; and tha t 

the informatio n i s not and has not been reasonabl y obtainabl e by 

legitimat e means without your consent. I 

Pursuant to 40 C.F.R . Part 2, Subpart B, EPA may at any time 

send you a lette r askin g you t o substantiat e full y ybur CBI 

claim . If yo u receiv e such a letter , you must provid e EPA wit h a 

respons e withi n the number of days se t fort h i n the EPA reques t 

letter . Failur e to submit you r comments withi n tha t time would 

be regarded as a waiver of you r confidentialit y clai m o r claims , 

and EPA may releas e the information . If you receiv e suchj a 
letter , EPA wil l ask you to specif y which portion s of the 

informatio n you conside r confidential . You must be specifi c by 

page, paragraph, and sentence when identifyin g the information 

subjec t t o you r claim . Any informatio n not specificall y 

identifie d as subjec t to a confidentialit y clai m may be disclosed , 

to the requesto r without furthe r notic e to you . Fo r each item o r 

clas s of informatio n tha t you identif y as bein g subjec t to CBI, 

you must answer the followin g questions , givin g as much detai l as 

possible ; 

1 . Fo r what perio d of time do you reques t tha t the informatio n 

be maintained as confidential , e.g. , unti l a certai n date , 

unti l the occurrenc e of a specifie d event, o r permanently? 

If the occurrenc e of a specifi c event wil l eliminat e the 

need fo r confidentiality , pleas e specif y that event. 

2. Information submitted to EPA becomes stal e over time. Why 

should the informatio n you clai m as confidentia l be 

protecte d fo r the time perio d specifie d in.you r answer to 

questio n #1? 

3. What measures have you taken to protec t the information 

claimed as confidential ? Have you disclose d the informatio n 

to anyone othe r than a governmental body o r someone who i s 

bound by an agreement not to disclos e the informatio n 

further ? If so , why shoul d the informatio n stil l be > 

considere d confidential ? 

4 . Is the informatio n containe d i n any publicl y availabl e 

materia l such as the Internet , publicl y availabl e databases, 

promotiona l publications , annual reports , o r articles ? Is 

ther e any means by which a member of the publi c coul d obtai n 

acces s t o the information ? Is the informatio n of a kin d 

that you would customaril y not releas e to the public ? 

5. Has any governmental body made a determination as to the 

confidentialit y of the information ? I f so , pleas e attac h a 

copy of the determination . 

6. Fo r each categor y of informatio n claime d as confidential , 

explai n wit h specificit y why releas e o f the informatio n i s 

likel y t o cause substantia l harm to you r competitiv e 

position . Explai n the specifi c natur e o f those harmful 

effects , why they shoul d be viewed as substantial , and the 

causa l relationshi p between disclosur e and such harmful 

effects . How coul d you r competitor s make use o f thi s 

informatio n to your detriment? 

7. Do you assert tha t the informatio n i s submitted on a 
voluntary or a mandatory basis? Please explain the reason 

f o r your assertion. If you assert that the information i s 

voluntaril y submitted information, explain whether and why 

disclosure of the information would tend to lessen the 

availabilit y to EPA of simila r information i n the future. 

8. Any other issue you deem relevant. 

Please note that emission data provided, under Section 114 of 

the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7414, i s not entitle d to confidentia l 

treatment under 40 C.F.R. Part 2. "Emission data" means, 

with reference to any source of emission of any substance 

into the air -

Information necessary to determine the identity , amount, 

frequency, concentration, or other characteristic s (to the 

extent related to ai r quality) of any emission which has 

been emitted by the source (or of any pollutant resultin g 

from any emission by the source), or any combination of the 

foregoing; 

Information necessary to determine the identity , amount, 

frequency, concentration, or other characteristic s (to the 

extent related to ai r quality) of the emissions which, under 

an applicable standard or limitation , the source was 

authorized to emit (including, to the extent necessary for 

such purposes, a descriptio n of the manner and rate of 

operation of the source); and 

A general description of the locatio n and/or nature of the 

source to the extent necessary to identif y the source and to 

distinguis h i t from other sources (including, to the extent 

necessary for such purposes, a descriptio n of the device, 

. installation , or operation constitutin g the source). 

40 C.F.R. § 2.301(a) (2) (i) (A), (B) and (C) . 

Emission data includes, but i s not limite d to, service records, 

statin g the amount of refrigeran t added to a unit or reclaimed 

from a unit . 

If you receive a request fo r a substantiation lette r from 

the EPA, you bear.the burden of substantiating your 

confidentialit y claim. Conclusory allegation s wil l be given 

little.o r no weight i n the determination. In substantiating your 

CBI claim(s), you must bracket al l text so claimed and mark i t 

"CBI." Information so designated wil l be disclose d by EPA only 

to the extent allowed by, and by means of the procedures set 

fort h in , 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B. I f you fai l to claim the 
information as confidential , i t may be made availabl e to the 

public without further notice to you. 

4 

VES 002449 
APPENDIX B 

Veolia. must submit the following information regarding 

Incinerator 2, Incinerator 3, and Incinerator 4 located at 

7 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, Illinoi s i n accordance with the 

foregoing request fo r information made pursuant to Section 114(a) 

of the Clean Ai r Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7414(a). 

1. No late r than Jul y 15, 2008, Veoli a shal l conduct a 

comprehensive performance test (CPT) on each incinerator to 

demonstrate compliance with the emission standards set fort h 

i n 40 C.F.R. §§ 63.1219(a) and 63.1219(c) and to establis h 

the applicable operating parameter limit s (OPLs) Under 40 

C.F.R. § 63.1209. 

2. Veoli a may not request pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(c)(2) 

that previous emissions test data serve as documentation of 

compliance with the emission standards set fort h i n 40 

C.F.R. §§ 63.1219(a) and 63.1219(c) and to establis h the 

applicable OPLs under 40 C.F.R. § 63.1209. 

3. No late r than 45 days afte r the receip t of thi s request, 

Veolia shal l submit to EPA a CPT Plan that includes the 

information specifie d at 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1). We have 

liste d below several items that EPA believes were missing 

from Veolia's CPT Plan dated December 29, 2003: 

a. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f) (1)(i)(A) , Veolia 

must include an analysis of each feed stream, including 

hazardous waste, other fuels, and industria l furnace 

feed stocks, as fired , that includes the heating value, 

concentrations of ash, low volatil e metals (LVM; 

arsenic, beryllium, and chromium), semivolatile metals 

(SVM.; cadmium and lead), mercury, and tota l (organic 

and inorganic) chlorine. 

b. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(A), Veolia 

must identif y each organic HAP established by 42 U.S.C. 

§ 7412(b)(1), excluding caprolactam (CAS number 105602) 

as provided by § 63.60, that i s present i n each 

hazardous waste feed stream. 

c. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(B), Veolia 

must provide, within the precisio n produced by 

analytica l procedures of 40 C.F.R.. § 63.1208(b)(8), the 

approximate quantificatio n of the identifie d organic 

HAPs i n the hazardous waste feedstreams. 

d. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(G) , Veolia 

must include a detaile d engineering descriptio n of the 
design, operation, and maintenance practices for any 

a i r pollutio n contro l system fo r each hazardous waste 

incinerator . 

e. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f) (1) (iv) , Veoli a must 

include a detaile d descriptio n of sampling and 

monitoring procedures, includin g sampling and 

monitoring locations i n the system, the equipment to be 

used, sampling and monitoring frequency, and planned 

analytica l procedures fo r sample analysis. 

f. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207 (f)(1)(v) , Veolia must 

include a detaile d tes t schedule fo r each hazardous 

waste fo r which the performance test i s planned, 

including date(s), duration, quantity of hazardous 

waste to be burned. 

g. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R- § 63.1207(f)(1)(vi), Veoli a must 

include a detaile d tes t protocol, including, for each 

hazardous waste identified , the ranges of hazardous 

waste feedrate fo r each feed system, and, as 

appropriate, the feedrates of other fuels and 

feedstocks, and any other relevant parameters that may 

affec t the abilit y of the HWC to meet the emission 

standards. 

h. . Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(vii), Veoli a must 

include a descriptio n of, and planned operating 

conditions for , any emission contro l equipment that 

wil l be used. 

i . Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(xi), i f Veoli a 

does not continuously monitor regulated constituents i n 

natural gas, process ai r feedstreams, and feedstreams 

from vapor recovery systems under 40 C.F.R. 

§ 63.1209(c)(5), Veoli a must document the expected 

level s of regulated constituents i n those feedstreams. 

j . Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(xix), Veoli a must 

document the temperature locatio n measurement i n the 

CPT plan. 

k. For Incinerator 4 only, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 

§ 63.1207(f)(1)(xx)(A), Veoli a must document the 

manufacturer specification s fo r minimum carrie r flui d 

flowrate or pressure drop. 

1. For Incinerator 4 only, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 

§ 63.1207(f)(1)(xx)(B), Veoli a roust identif y the key 

parameters that affec t carbon adsorption, and the 

2 

VES 
operating limit s you establis h fo r those parameters 

based on the carbon used during the performance test , 

i f you elec t not to specify and use the brand and type 

of carbon used during the CPT. 

m. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(xxv), Veoli a must 

document key parameters that affec t adsorption of 

hydrogen chlorid e and chlorine gas (HCl/Clz) and the 

limit s you establis h fo r those parameters based on the 

sorbent used during the performance test. 

n. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(f)(1)(xxvi), fo r 

purposes of calculatin g SVM, LVM, mercury, tota l 

(organic and inorganic) chlorine, and ash feed rate 

limits , Veoli a must describe how the company wil l 

handle performance tes t feed stream analytica l result s 

that determine these constituents are not present a t 

detectable levels . 

o. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. §§ 63.1207(f)(1)(xxvii) and 

63.1219(c)(3) (ii) , Veoli a must identif y one or more 

principa l organic hazardous constituent(s) that 

represent the most difficul t to destroy organic 

compounds i n it s hazardous waste feedstreams. Veoli a 

must base thi s specificatio n on the degree of 

difficult y of incineratio n of the organic constituents 

i n the hazardous waste and on thei r concentration or 

mass i n the hazardous waste feed, considering; the 

result s of hazardous waste analyses or other data and 

information. 

Veolia may request EPA's approval to extrapolate the feed 

rates of LVMs, SVMs, or mercury. In such a request, Veoli a 

must include: 

a. A descriptio n of the extrapolation methodology and 

rational e fo r how the approach ensures compliance with 

the emission standards; 

b. Documentation of the historica l range of normal and 

maximum (i.e. , other than during compliance testing) 

metals feed rates fo r each feedstream; 

c. Documentation that the leve l of spiking recommended 

during the performance tes t wil l mask sampling and 

analysis imprecision and inaccuracy to the extent that 

the extrapolated feed rat e limit s adequately assure 

compliance with the emission standards; 

d. Documentation of whether some leve l of spikin g would be 
appropriat e and whether the physica l form and specie s 

of spike d materia l i s appropriate ; and 

e. An estimate o f the extrapolate d LVM, SVM, and mercuryfee d rates . 

5. Veoli a may request EPA's approval to use Method 23 fo r 

dioxins/furan s instea d of Method 0023A. I n such a request, 

Veoli a must includ e the result s of al l previou s dioxin/fura n 

(D/F) performance tests . 

6. Veoli a may includ e an applicatio n to reques t alternativ e 

monitorin g under 40 C.F.R. § 63.1209(g)(1). 

7. During the CPT, Veoli a must collec t sufficien t data t o 

establis h al l necessary OPLs. EPA believe s tha t the 

followin g OPLs se t fort h i n 40 C.F.R. § 63.1209(j-p) appl y 

to each incinerator : 

a. Incinerato r #2 

63.1209 HAP1 OPL 

(j)(l) , (k)(2) DRE2, D/F 

Minimum Primary Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

(j)(l) , (k)(2) DRE, D/F 

Minimum Secondary Combustion 

Chamber Temperature 

(j)(2) , (k)(3) , 

(m)(2), (n)(5), 

(o) (2) 

DRE, D/F, 

PM,

 3 

SVM/LVM, 

HC1/C12 

Maximum Flu e Gas Flow Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l High BTU Liquid s 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k) (4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l Solid s Waste Feed 

Rate 

( j) (3) , (k) (4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l Low BTU Liquid s 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j){3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l Specialt y Feed 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k) (4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum SCC Tota l High BTU Liquid s 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k) (4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC, SCC Tota l Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3) , (k) (4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable High BTU 

Liquid s Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k) (4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Solid s Waste 

Feed Rate 

1 HAP = hazardous ai r pollutant . 

2 DRE = Destruction and Removal Efficiency . 

3 PM = Particulat e matter. 

4 

VES 002453 
63.1209 HAP1 OPL 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Dow BTU 

Liquids Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Specialty Feed 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3>, (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum SCC Pumpable Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(4) DRE 

Waste Firin g System OPL fo r High. 

BTU Liquids 

(j)(4) DRE 

Waste Firin g System OPL fo r Low BTU 

Liquids 

(k) (1) , (n) (1) DRE, 

SVM/LVM 

Maximum Fabric Filte r Inle t 

Temperature 

(1)(1) (i) Mercury Maximum Mercury Feed Rate 

(in) (1) (iv) PM 

Representative and reliabl e 

indicato r of PM control device 

performance 

(m) (3) PM Maximum Ash Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (i) SVM Maximum SVM Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (ii ) LVM Maximum Total LVM Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (vi) LVM Maximum Pumpable LVM Feed Rate 

(o) (1) (i) SVM/LVM, 

HCi/Cl2 

Maximum HC1/C12 Feed Rate 

(o) (4) (i) HCl/Cla 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Minimum Sorbent 

Feed Rate 

(o) (4) (ii ) HC1/C12 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Minimum Carrie r 

Flui d Flow Rate Or Nozzle Pressure 

Drop 

(o) (4) (iii ) (A) HC1/C12 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Specify and use 

the Brand and Type of Carbon used 

during the CPT 

(P) A l l Maximum Combustion Chamber Pressure 

b. Incinerator #3 

63.1209 HAP OPL 

(j)(l) , (k) (2) DRE, D/F 

Minimum Primary Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

(j)(l) , (k)(2) DRE, D/F 

Minimum Secondary. Combustion 

Chamber Temperature 

(j)(2) , (k)(3), 

(m)(2), (n)(5), 

(o) (2) 

DRE, D/F, 

PM, 

SVM/LVM, 

HC1/C1Z 

Maximum Flue Gas Flow Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l High BTU Liquids 

Waste Feed Rate 
63.1209 HAP OPL 

(j)(3), <k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Tota l Solid s Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Tota l Low BTU Liquid s 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Tota l Specialt y Feed 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum SCC Tota l High BTU Liquid s 

Waste Fee d Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC, SCC Tota l Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Pumpable Hig h BTU 

Liquid s Waste Feed Rate 

(j)<3), (k) (4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Pumpable Solid s Waste 

Feed Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Pumpable Low BTU 

Liquid s Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Pumpable Specialt y Feed 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Pumpable Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum SCC Pumpable Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j) (4) DRE Waste Firin g System OPL fo r High 

BTU Liquid s 

(j)(4) DRE Waste Firin g System OPL fo r Low BTU 

Liquid s 

(k)(l) , (n)(l) DRE, 

SVM/LVM 

Maximum Fabri c Filte r Inle t 

Temperature 

(1) (1)(i) Mercury Maximum Mercury Feed Rate 

(m) (1) (iv) PM 

Representativ e and reliabl e 

indicato r of PM contro l devic e 

performance 

(m) (3) PM Maximum Ash Feed Rate 

(n)(2)(i) SVM Maximum SVM Fee d Rate 

(n)(2)(ii) LVM Maximum Tota l LVM Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (vi) LVM Maximum Pumpable LVM Fee d Rate 

(o) (1)(i) SVM/LVM, 

HCI/CI2 

Maximum HCI/CI2 Feed Rate 

(o) (4) (i) HCI/CI2 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Minimum Sorbent 

Feed Rate 

(o)(4)(ii) HCI/CI2 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Minimum Carrie r 

Flui d Flow Rate Or. Nozzl e Pressur e 

Drop 

(o) (4) (iii ) (A) HC1/C12 

Spra y Dr y Adsorber: Specif y and use 

t he Brand and Type o f Carbon used 

durin g the CPT 

(P) A l l Maximum Combustion Chamber Pressur e 

6 

VES 002455 
c. Incinerator #4 

63.1209 HAP OPL 

(j)(l) , (k)(2) ORE, D/F 

Minimum Primary Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

(j)(l) , <k)(2) DRE, D/F 

Minimum Secondary Combustion 

Chamber Temperature 

(j)(2) , (k)(3), 

(ni) (2), (n)(5), 

(o) (2) 

DRE, D/F, 

PM, 

SVM/LVM, 

HC1/C12 

Maximum Flue Gas Flow Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)<4> DRE, D/F 

MajdjTtum PCC Total High BTU Liquids 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum PCC Tota l Solids Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l Low BTU Liquids 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Tota l Specialty Feed 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)<3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum SCC Tota l High BTU Liquids 

Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC, SCC Total Waste Feed 

Rate 

<j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable High BTU 

Liquids Waste Feed Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Solids Waste 

Feed Rate . 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Low BTU 

Liquids Waste Feed Rate 

<j)(3), (k)(4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Specialty Feed 

Waste Feed Rate 

{j)(3) f (k)<4) DRE, D/F 

Maximum PCC Pumpable Waste Feed 

Rate 

(j)(3) , (k)(4) DRE, D/F Maximum SCC Pumpable Waste Feed 

Rate 

( j) (4) DRE 

Waste Firin g System OPL for High 

BTU Liquids 

(j)(4) DRE 

Waste Firin g System OPL fo r Low BTU 

Liquid s 

(k)(l) , (n)(1) DRE, 

SVM/LVM 

Maximum Fabric Filte r Inle t 

Temperature 

(k) (6)(i) D/F Minimum carbon Injectio n Rate 

(k) (6)(ii ) D/F 

Minimum Carrie r Flui d (Gas or 

Liquid) Flow Rate or Pressure Drop 

(k)(6)(iii)(A ) D/F Brand (i.e. , Manufacturer) and Type 

of Carbon 

(1)(1)(i) Mercury Maximum Mercury Feed Rate 

7 

VES 002456 
63.1209 HAP OPL 

(m) (1) (iv) PM 

Representative and Reliabl e 

Indicator of PM Control Device 

Performance 

(m)(3) PM Maximum Ash Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (i) SVM Maximum SVM Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (ii ) LVM Maximum Tota l LVM Feed Rate 

(n) (2) (vi) LVM Maximum Pumpable LVM Feed Rate 

'(o) (1) (i) SVM/LVM, 

HCI/CI 2 

Maximum HC1/C12 Feed Rate 

(o.) (4) (i) HCl/Cl2 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Minimum Sorbent 

Feed Rate 

(o) (4)(ii ) HC1/C12 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Minimum Carrie r 

Flui d Flow Rate or Nozzle Pressure 

Drop 

(o) (4) (iii ) (A) HC1/C12 

Spray Dry Adsorber: Specify and use 

the Brand and Type of Carbon used 

during the CPT 

(P) A l l Maximum Combustion Chamber Pressure 

Veoli a i s responsible fo r identifyin g any additiona l 

applicable OPLs. 

8. In addition to the OPLs liste d above, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 

§ 63.1209(g)(2), the Administrator requires Veoli a to 

establis h a maximum quench outle t temperature OPL for each 

incinerator . Veoli a must establis h a maximum hourly rollin g 

average limi t as the average of the tes t run averages. 

9. During the CPT oh each incinerator, Veoli a must feed normal 

(or higher) level s of chlorin e during the dioxin/furan 

performance test . 

10. During the CPT on each incinerator, Veolia must feed normal 

(or higher) level s of ash during the LVM and SVM performance 

tests . 

11. During the CPT on Incinerator 4, Veoli a must feed normal (or 

higher) level s of ash during the dioxin/furan and mercury 

performance tests . 

12. During the CPT on each incinerator, Veolia must conduct the 

PM, SVM, and LVM performance tests when the PM contro l 

device undergoes it s normal (or more frequent) cleaning 

cycle . For Incinerator 4, Veoli a must also conduct the 

dioxin/furan and mercury performance test s while the PM 

contro l device undergoes a normal (or more frequent) 

cleaning cycle. 

8 
13. Because Veoli a must establis h limit s fo r the applicable 

operating parameters specifie d i n § 63.1209 based on 

operations during the CPT, Veoli a may conduct testin g under 

two or more operating modes to provide Operating 

flexibility . 

14. No late r than 30 days afte r EPA approves the CPT and 

continuous monitoring system-performance evaluation tes t 

(CMS PET) plans, Veoli a must commence.the CPT on each 

incinerator . Veoli a must complete the CPT on each 

incinerato r within 30 days of commencement. 

15. Afte r EPA approves the CPT and CMS PET plans, Veoli a must 

make them availabl e to the public,- and issue a notice 

advising the publi c where the test plans are availabl e fo r 

review. 

16. No late r than 60 days afte r completion of the CPTs, Veoli a 

must submit to EPA and Illinoi s EPA a Notificatio n of 

Compliance (NOC), as described i n 40 C.F.R. §§ 63w7(g), 

63.9(h), and 63.1210(d), fo r each incinerator documenting 

compliance with the emission standards and CMS requirements, 

and identifyin g OPLs under 40 C.F.R. § 63.1209. 

17. Veoli a must document and include with the NOC the result s of 

any other performance tes t runs, conducted o r attempted, 

before or afte r the CPT. 

18. No late r than 60 days afte r completion of the CPTs, Veoli a 

must submit a revised Part 71 permit applicatio n to reflect -

the OPLs determined during the CPTs. 

19. These CPTs would serve as the CPT required between 

October 14, 2008, the compliance date fo r the standards set 

fort h i n 40 C.F.R. § 63.1219(a) and (c.) , and October 14, 

2009, the date by which Veoli a i s otherwise required to 

conduct a CPT on each incinerator . 

9 

VES 002458 
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 

I, Loretta Shaffer, certif y that I sent a Request to Provide 

Information Pursuant to the Clean Ai r Act by Certifie d Mail, 

Return Receipt Requested, to: 

Douglas Harris, General Manager 

Veoli a ES Technical Solutions, LLC 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, Illinoi s 62201 

I also certif y that I sent a copy of the Request to Provide 

Information Pursuant to the Clean Ai r Act by Firs t Class Mail to: 

Ray Pilapil , Manager 

Compliance and Enforcement Section Bureau of Ai r 

Illinoi s Environmental Protection Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue East 

Springfield , Illinoi s 62702 

And 

Michael Reed, Unit Manager 

Clean Ai r Act Permit Program Bureau of Ai r 

Illinoi s Environmental Protection Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue East 

Springfield/ Illinoi s 62702 

on the <sy7*} day of 

Certifie d Mail Receipt Number: 7/3fl/ f\&6(j> Oltl 7cZJ& 
standard bcc's: Officia l Pil e Copy w/enclosure(s) 

Section Reading Fil e w/o enclosure(s) 

Branch Reading Fil e w/o enclosure(s) 

other bee's: J . Woolums, C-14J 

Creation Date: February 19, 2008 

Filename: C: \EPAWORK\WasteCombustion\hazwaste\Sources.\ 

Veolia\114Letter.doc 

Legend: ARD:AECAB:AECAS(MN/OH):C.hall 

VES 002460 
E 

VES 002461 
Doug Harris/OES/ONYX To Newton.Cheryl@epa.gov 

03/21/2008 02:23 PM cc Blakley.Pamela@epa.gov, Damico.Genevievfe@epa.gov, 

Woolums.Jane@epa.gov, Hall.Chartes@epa:gov, 

RamaIy.Todd@epa.gov, Blough.James@epa.gov, Greig 

bcc 

Subject CPT Schedule for Incinerators 2,3 and 4 

As we discussed during our March 13 meeting, we are forwarding the testing schedule for Incinerators 2, 

3 and 4. You'll find attachment 1 being the integrated schedule for all three incinerators. Attachments 2, 3 

and 4 are the individual schedules for Incinerators 2,4 and 3, respectively. Please do not hesitate to call 

with any questions or comments. 

CPT Integrated Schedule for 2,3,4_March, 2008 CPT Schedule for#2_March, 2008.d 

m @ 

CPT Schedule for#4_March, 2008.d CPT Schedule for #3_March, 2008,d 

VES 002462 
Integrated Comprehensive Performance Testing (CPT) Schedule 

for Veolia Incinerators #2, #3, and #4 

Task 

Develop CPT Plan for Unit #2. 

Submit Unit #2 CPT Plan to Agency. 

Agency approves Unit #2 CPT Plan.2 

Begin process to have the Unit #2 CPT Plan made 

available to the public for at least 60 days and 

issue public notice to facility/public mailing list 

per 40 CFR §63.1207(e)(2). Unit #2 CPT 

planning, scheduling, and logistics activities 

commenced by ENSR and Veolia. 

Anticipated 

Duration Date To Be Completed

 1 

60 Days May 15,2008 

May 15,2008 

15 Days May 30,2008 

May 30,2008 

Submit CPT Plan for Unit #4. 

Agency approves Unit #4 CPT Plan.3 14 Days 

Begin process to have the Unit #4 CPT Plan made 

available to the public for at least 60 days and 

issue public notice to facility/public mailing list 

per 40 CFR §63.1207(e)(2). Unit #4 CPT 

planning, scheduling, and logistics activities 

commenced by ENSR and Veolia. 

Unit #2 CPT Plan available to public for at least 60 64 Days 

days and issue public notice to facility/public 

mailing list per 40 CFR §63.1207(eX2). 

Commence Unit #2 testing.4 

Complete Unit #2 testing. 15 Days 

Submit CPT Plan for Unit #3. 

Unit #4 CPT Plan available to public for at least 60 63 Days 

days and issue public notice to facility/public 

mailing list per 40 CFR §63.1207(eX2).5 

Agency approves Unit #3 CPT Plan.6 15 Days 

Begin process to have the Unit #3 CPT Plan made 

available to the public for at least 60 days and 

issue public notice to facility/public mailing list 

per40CFR§63.I207(e)(2). Unit#3CPT 

planning, scheduling, and logistics activities 

commenced by ENSR and Veolia. 

July 1,2008 

July 15,2008 

July 15,2008 

August 1,2008 

August 1,2008 

August 15,2008 

September 15,2008 

September 15,2008 

September 30,2008 

September 30,2008 
Task Duration 

Anticipated 

Date To Be Completed

 1 

Unit #2 CPT Report submitted to Agency.7 

Notification of Compliance (NOC) for Unit #2 

submitted to Agency.7 

Finding of Compliance from Agency for Unit #2.8 

Commence Unit #4 testing.9 

Unit #3 CPT Plan available to public for at least 60 

days and issue public notice to facility/public 

mailing list per 40 CFR §63.1207(eX2).10 

Complete Unit #4 testing. 

Unit #4 CPT Report submitted to Agency.11 

NOC for Unit #4 submitted to Agency. " 

Finding of Compliance from Agency for Unit #4.12 

Commence Unit #3 testing.13 

Complete Unit #3 testing. 

Unit #3 CPT Report submitted to Agency.14 

NOC for Unit #3 submitted to Agency.14 

Finding of Compliance from Agency for Unit #3. 

60 Days October 14,2008 

90 Days November 13,2008 

30 Days November 13,2008 

December 1,2008 

63 Days December 1,2008 

15 Days December 15, 2008 

60 Days February 13,2009 

90 Days March 13,2009 

31 Days March 16,2009 

April 1, 2009 

15 Days April 15,2009 

61 Days June 15,2009 

90 Days July 14,2009 

30 Days August 14,2009 

1

 Opportunities may exist in this schedule that could result in tasks being completed earlier lhan the 

anticipated date of completion. Conversely, throughout this CPT schedule that Veolia is proposing, 

anticipated completion dates are based on previous actions being completed on the given date, jf these 

previous actions are not finished by the listed due date, it may be necessary to extend subsequent 

completion dates. 

2

 If approval of the Unit WI CPT Plan exceeds 15 days, ttie May 30,2008 completion date, and subsequent 

task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. 

3

 If approval of the Unit #4 CPT Plan exceeds 14 days, the July 15,2008 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, may be revised to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. Dueto the 

early submittal of this plan, a delay in Agency approval may not affect the schedule. 

4

 If a delay in the commencement ofthe Unit #2 CPT occurs that is beyond the control of Veolia, the 

August 1,2008 date for starting this testing, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised 

to reflect this extension of the schedule. 
5

 This process will be repeated if changes in the approved CPT Plan for Unit #4 are made. If this process 

is repeated, subsequent task completion dates may be revised to reflect an extension of the schedule. 

6

 If approval ofthe Unit #3 CPT Plan exceeds 15 days, the September 30,2008 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, may be revised to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. Due to the 

early submittal of this plan, a delay in Agency approval may not affect the schedule. 

7

 If Unit #2 test results are not obtained in a timely manner or are flawed in some way that would delay the 

submittal of me CPT report and the NOC, the October 14,2008 and the November 13,2008 completion 

dates, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 

8

 If the Finding of Compliance for Unit #2 exceeds 30 days, the November 13,2008 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 

9

 If a delay in the commencement ofthe Unit #4 CPT occurs that is beyond fhe control of Veolia 

(e.g., the Finding of Compliance for Unit #2 has not been received), the December 1,2008 date for 

starting this testing, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension ofthe 

schedule. 

1 0

 This process will be repeated if changes in the approved CPT Plan for Unit #3 are made. If this process 

- is repeated, subsequent task completion dates may be revised to reflect an extension of the schedule. 

1 1

 If Unit #4 test results are not obtained in a timely manner or are flawed in some way that would delay 

fhe submittal ofthe CPT report and the NOC, the February 13,2009 and the March 13,2009 completion 

dates, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 

1 2

 If the Finding of Compliance for Unit #4 exceeds 31 days, the March 16,2009 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. 

1 3

 If a delay in the commencement of the Unit #3 CPT occurs that is beyond the control of Veolia 

(e.g., the Finding of Compliance for Unit #4 has not been received), the April 1,2009 date for 

starting this testing, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the 

schedule. 

1 4

 If Unit #3 test results are not obtained in a timely manner or are flawed in some way that would delay 

the submittal ofthe CPT report and the NOC, the June 15,2009 and July 14,2009 completion dates, and 

subsequent task completion date, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 
VES 002466 
Comprehensive Performance Testing (CPT) Schedule 

for Veolia Incinerator #2 

Task Duration 

Develop CPT Plan for Unit #2. 60 Days 

Submit Unit #2 CPT Plan to Agency. 

Agency approves Unit #2 CPT Plan.2 15 Days 

Begin process to have the Unit #2 CPT Plan made 

available to the public for at least 60 days and 

issue public notice to facility/public mailing list 

per 40 CFR §63.1207(e)(2)- Unit #2 CPT 

planning, scheduling, and logistics activities 

commenced by ENSR and Veolia. 

Unit #2 CPT Plan available to public for at least 60 64 Days 

days and issue public notice to facility/public 

mailing list per 40 CFR §63.1207(eX2). 

Commence Unit #2 testing.4 

Complete Unit #2 testing. ' 15 Days 

Unit #2 CPT Report submitted to Agency.7 60 Days 

Notification of Compliance (NOC) for Unit #2 90 Days 

submitted to Agency.7 

Anticipated 

Date To Be Completed

 1 

May 15,2008 

May 15,2008 

May 30,2008 

May 30,2008 

August 1,2008 

August 1,2008 

August 15,2008 

October 14,2008 

November 13,2008 

Finding of Compliance from Agency for Unit #2.8 30 Days November 13,2008 

1

 Opportunities may exist in this schedule that could result in tasks being completed earlier than the 

anticipated date of completion. Conversely, throughout this CPT schedule that Veolia is proposing, 

anticipated completion dates are based on previous actions being completed on the given date. If these 

previous actions are not finished by the listed due date, it may be necessary to extend subsequent 

completion dates. 

2

 If approval of the Unit #2 CPT Plan exceeds 15 days, the May 30,2008 completion date, and subsequent 

task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. 

4

 If a delay in the commencement of the Unit #2 CPT occurs that is beyond the control of Veolia, the 

August 1,2008 date for starting this testing, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised 

to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. 
7

 If Unit #2 test results are not obtained in a timely manner or are flawed in some way that would delay the 

submittal ofthe CPT report and the NOC, the October 14,2008 and the November 13,2008 completion 

dates, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. 

8

 If the Finding of Compliance for Unit #2 exceeds 30 days, the November 13,2008 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 
Comprehensive Performance Testing fCPT) Schedule 

for Veolia Incinerator #2 

Task Duration 

Develop CPT Plan for Unit #2. 60 Days 

Submit Unit #2 CPT Plan to Agency. 

Agency approves Unit #2 CPT Plan.2 15 Days 

Begin process to have the Unit #2 CPT Plan made 

available to the public for at least 60 days and 

issue public notice to facility/public mailing list 

per 40 CFR §63.1207(e)(2). Unit #2 CPT 

planning, scheduling, and logistics activities 

commenced by ENSR and Veolia. 

Unit #2 CPT Plan available to public for at least 60 64 Days 

days and issue public notice to facility/public 

mailing list per 40 CFR §63.1207(e)(2). 

Commence Unit #2 testing.4 

Complete Unit #2 testing. 15 Days 

Unit #2 CPT Report submitted to Agency.7 60 Days 

Notification of Compliance (NOC) for Unit #2 90 Days 

submitted to Agency.7 

Anticipated 

Date To Be Completed

 1 

May 15,2008 

May 15,2008 

May 30,2008 

May 30,2008 

August 1,2008 

August 1,2008 

August 15,2008 

October 14,2008 

November 13,2008 

Finding of Compliance from Agency for Unit #2.8 30 Days November 13,2008 

1

 Opportunities may exist in this schedule that could result in tasks being completed earlier than the 

anticipated date of completion. Converselyj throughout this CPT schedule that Veolia is proposing, 

anticipated completion dates are based on previous actions being completed on the given date. If these 

previous actions are not finished by the listed due date, it may be necessary to extend subsequent 

completion dates. 

2

 If approval of the Unit #2 CPT Plan exceeds 15 days, the May 30,2008 completion date, and subsequent 

task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 

4

 If a delay in the commencement ofthe Unit #2 CPT occurs that is beyond the control of Veolia, the 

August 1, 2008 date for starting this testing, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised 

to reflect this extension ofthe schedule. 
ff Unit #2 test results are not obtained in a timely manner or are flawed in some way that would delay the 

submittal ofthe CPT report and the NOC, the October 14,2008 and the November 13,2008 completion 

dates, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 

!

 If fhe Finding of Compliance for Unit #2 exceeds 30 days, the November 13,2008 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 
Comprehensive Performance Testing (CPT) Schedule 

for Veolia Incinerator #4 

Task Duration 

Submit CPT Plan for Unit #4. 

Agency approves Unit #4 CPT Plan.3 14 Days 

Begin process to have the Unit #4 CPT Plan made 

available to the public for at least 60 days and 

issue public notice to facility/public mailing list 

per 40 CFR §63.1207(e)(2). Unit #4 CPT 

planning, scheduling, and logistics activities 

conunenced by ENSR and Veolia. 

Unit #4 CPT Plan available to public for at least 60 63 Days 

days and issue public notice to facility/public 

mailing list per 40 CFR §63.1207(eX2).5 

Commence Unit #4 testing.9 

Complete Unit #4 testing. 15 Days 

Unit #4 CPT Report submitted to Agency." 60 Days 

NOC for Unit #4 submitted to Agency." 90 Days 

Finding of Compliance from Agency for Unit #4.12 31 Days 

Anticipated 

Date To Be Completed ' 

July 1,2008 

July 15,2008 

July 15,2008 

September 15,2008 

December 1,2008 

December 15,2008 

February 13, 2009 

March 13,2009 

March 16,2009 

1

 Opportunities may exist in this schedule that could result in tasks being completed earlier man the 

anticipated date of completion. Conversely, throughout this CPT schedule that Veolia is proposing, 

anticipated completion dates are based on previous actions being completed on the given date. If these 

previous actions are not finished by the listed due date, it may be necessary to extend subsequent 

completion dates. 

3

 If approval of the Unit #4 CPT Plan exceeds 14 days, the July 15,2008 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, may be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. Due to the 

early submittal of this plan, a delay in Agency approval may not affect the schedule. 

5

 This process will be repeated if changes in the approved CPT Plan for Unit #4 are made. If this process 

is repeated, subsequent task completion dates may be revised to reflect an extension of the schedule. 

9

 If a delay in the commencement of the Unit #4 CPT occurs that is beyond the control of Veolia 

(e.g., the Finding of Compliance for Unit #2 has not been received), the December 1,2008 date for 

starting this testing, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the 

schedule. 
1 1

 If Unit #4 test results are not obtained in a timely manner or are flawed in some way that would delay 

the submittal ofthe CPT report and the NOC, the February 13,2009 and the March 13,2009 completion 

dates, and subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 

1 2

 If the Finding of Compliance for Unit #4 exceeds 31 days, the March 16,2009 completion date, and 

subsequent task completion dates, will be revised to reflect this extension of the schedule. 
F 

VES 002473