,"'~ ;,... ; .,.. . "":
 

'<.:-'_' -f... _:?;,. ] _·1 -r-.L j -r::; n
 _ - __ _'J ,--...,;' ."'.(..t..... J.. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY 

Nonnan H. Bangerter 

Governor ,;. 1950 West NOrth TemOle	 "eoly to: S;ate oi Utah Kenneth L. Alkema _ Salt Lake City. Ulah	 D,YISlon or Air Quality ExecutJVf: Director 

F. Burnell Cordner (8011 536·4000	 Department of Envrronmenta! Ouailty 

Director at	 (80 , ) 536-4099 Fax Sail Lake City. Utah 84114-4820 

DAQE-167-92 

February 19, 1992 

James	 R. Van orman 

Director, Environmental Management office 

Department of the Air Force 

Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center (AFLC) 

Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056 

.Re:	 Approval Order for JP-4 Tank Throughput Limitations 

Dear Mr. Van Orman: 

Thts amended AO is being issued to update and combine the AOs dated January 3, 

1989 and July 29, 1991. The JP-4 tank throughput limitations are combined to 

give one throughput limit for all four tanks. The re-worded throughput 

limitations give more flexibility and do not allow an increase in total 

throughput. 

The above-referenced project has been evaluated and found to be consistent 

with the requirements of the Utah Air Conservation Regulations (UACR) and the 

Utah Air Conservation Act. This air quality AO authorizes the project with 

the following conditions and failure to comply with any of the conditions may 

constitute a violation of this order: 

1.	 This AO shall replace the AO's issued to Hill Air Force Base on 

July 29, 1991 and January 3, 1989. 

2.	 The approved facilities. shall consist of the following equipment:. 

A.	 Two steam generators, a total heat input rate of 120.3 

MMBTU/hr with natural gas as primary fuel with a standby 

diesel fuel (116.5 MMBTU/hr) at building 260; 

B.	 Dual seals for JP-4 storage tanks 10873, 10885, 10861 and 

10862; 

C.	 TwO mobile waste hydraulic fluid reclamation units based at 

Building 514; 

D.	 Paint spray booth and two lab hoods at the Building 5N; 

E.	 Lab Hoods 

4.2.4-744 

Pr:nlec on recycleo oaDer 
F.	 Nine Turboclean chambers, or equivalent, for the paint spray 

hangar at Building 220 - In addition, water reducible primer 

or low VOC primer shall be substituted for solvent base 

primer, and a high volume low pressure (HVLP) type spray gun 

shall replace the conventional paint spray gun. 

Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive Secretary. 

3.	 Visible emissions from any point or fugitive emission source 

associated with the emission points listed in this AO shall not 

exceed 10\ opacity. opacity observation of emissions from 

stationary sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 

60, Appendix A, Method 9. 

4.	 The following operating limits shall not be exceeded without prior 

approval in accordance with R446-1-3.1, UAC: 

A.	 Steam generators, Building 260 

1)	 465.7 X 109 BTU from natural gas per 12-month period 

2)	 108.3 x 106 BTU from natural gas per hour 

3)	 50.1 x 109 BTU from diesel fuel per 12-month period 

4)	 116.5 x 106 BTU from diesel fuel per hour 

5)	 4,300 hours per 12-month period 

B.	 Storage tanks 10873, 10885, 10861 and 10862 - total 

combined JP-4 throughput for all four tanks shall not exceed 

1,260,000 barrels per 12-month period and shall be 

determined by summing individual tank throughputs 

F.	 Hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units, Building 514 

1)	 30,000 gallons of total fluid per 12-month period 

2)	 8 hours per day 

3)	 2,080 hours per 12-month period 

Compliance with the annual limitations shall be qetermined on a 

rolling 12-month total. Based on the first day of each month a 

new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 

months. Records of usage, operation, and production shall be kept 

for all periods when the plant/equipment is in operation. Records 

of usage, operation, and production shall be made available to the 

Executive Secretary or his representative upon request, and shall 

include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. 

Fuel consumption for steam generators shall be determined by 

examination of fuel meter records. Storage tank throughputs shall 

be determined by examination of tank throughput records, which 

shall be kept on a daily basis. Hydraulic fluid waste reclamation 

unit throughput shall be determined by examination of usage 

records, which shall be kept on a daily basis. Hours of operation 

shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an 

operations log. 

5.	 The owner/operator shall comply with R446-1-4.9.1(c), UAC for
 

controlling emissions form storage tanks 10861, 10862, 10873 and
 

10885.
 

6.	 In addition to the requirements of this AO, all provisions of 40
 

CFR 60, NSPS Subparts A and Ka apply to storage tanks.
 

4.2.4-745
 
7.	 The condenser at the final point of each of the hydraulic fluid 

waste reclamation units shall operate during the operation of 

hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units. If the condenser is out 

of service, the hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units shall not 

be used until the condenser has been returned to service. The 

hydraulic waste reclamation equipment shall be operated for 

maximum solvent recovery at all times. 

The condenser shall be capable of recovering no less than 75% of 

solvents from the fluid. Records of solvent recovery shall be 

kept for all periods when the hydraulic fluid waste reclamation 

units	 are in operation. 

Demonstration of the 75% recovery shall be made by monitoring the 

solvent input and solvent recovery over a specified period of time 

acceptable to the Executive Secretary and calculating the percent 

recovery. A compliance demonstration shall be performed if 

directed by the Executive Secretary. Records of the amount of 

solvent recovered shall be kept for all periods when the hydraulic 

fluid waste reclamation units are in operation. The record shall 

include the following items: 

A.	 Date; 

B.	 Unit usage (start and end times); 

C.	 Total hydraulic fluid waste processed; 

D.	 Amount solvent recovered. 

8.	 The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel 

and #2 diesel fuel as a backup fuel in the steam generators. If 

any other fuel is to be used, an AO shall be required in 

accordance with R446-1-3.1, UAC. 

Natural gas consumption shall not exceed 465.7 x 108 scf per 12­

month period, and diesel fuel consumption shall not exceed 5% of 

the annual fuel used in the boilers without prior approval in 

accordance with R446-1-3.1, UAC. Compliance with the l~itations

shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. Based on the 

first day of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated 

using the previous 12 months. Records of fuel consumption shall 

be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records 

of fuel consumption shall be made available to the Executive 

Secretary upon request, and shall include a period of two years 

ending with the date of the request. Fuel consumption shall be 

determined by examination of fuel meter records and fuel bills. 

9.	 The sulfur content of any diesel fuel burned shall not exceed 

0.50% bv weight as determined by ASTM Method 0-4294-89. The 

sulfur content shall be tested if directed by the Executive 

Secretary. 

10.	 The paint spray booth at Building 5N shall be equipped with a set 

of paint arrestor particulate filters (or equivalent) to control 

particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass 

through this control system before being vented into the 

atmosphere. Equivalency shall be determined by the Executive 

Secretary. 

11.	 The paint spray hangar at Building 220 shall be equipped with 2 

water wall (or equivalent) to control particulate emissions. A~l

air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system 

.-.,. before being vented to the atmosphere. Equivalency shall be 

determined by the Executive Secretary. 

4.2.4-746 
12.	 Emissions of vec from the paint spray booth and the two lab hoods 

in Building SN shall not exceed a total of 2.37 tons per l2-month 

period without prior approval in accordance with R446-1-3.1, UAC. 

Compliance with the limitation shall be determined on a rolling 

12-month total. Based on the first day of each month a new 12­

month total shall be calculated using the previous l2 months. The 

building emissions of VOC shall be determined by maintaining a 

record of paints, thinners and cleaning agents used. The record 

shall include the following data for each item used: 

A.	 Name of paint or thinner 

B.	 Weight in pounds per gallon 

C.	 Percent vec by weight 

D.	 Amount used on a daily basis 

Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the 

plant	 is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made 

available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall 

include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. 

vee emissions shall be determined by the following manner: 

vee = (% Volatile by weight I 100) * (Density lb/gal) * 

(Gallons consumed) / (2,000 lb/ton) 

The vec content in pounds for each individual item or surface 

coating used shall be calculated, and then the total of all items 

shall be summed, such that the cumulative total shall not exceed 

the 2.37 tons per l2-month period as specified. 

13.	 Emissions of vee from the paint spray hangar in Building 220 shall 

not exceed 17.2 tons per 12-month period without prior approval in 

accordance with R446-1-3.l, UAC. compliance with the limitation 

shall be determined on a rolling l2-month total. Based on the 

first day of each month a new l2-month total shall be calculated 

using the previous 12 months. The building emissions of vee shall 

be determined by maintaining a record of paints and thinners used. 

The record shall include the following data for each item used: 

A.	 Name of paint or thinner 

B.	 Weight in pounds per gallon 

C.	 Percent vee by weight 

D.	 Amount used on a daily basis 

Records of consumption shall be kept for all periods when the 

plant is in operation. Records of consumption shall be made 

available to the Executive Secretary upon request, and shall 

include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. 

VOC emissions shall be determined by the following manner: 

vee = (% Volatile by weight I 100) * (Density lb/gal) * 

(Gallons Consumed) / (2,000 lb/ton) 

The vee content in pounds for each individual item or surface 

coating used shall be calculated, and then the total of all items 

shall be summed, such that the cumulative total shall not exceed 

the 17.2 tons per 12-month period as specified. 

-- \ 

4.2.4-747
 
14.	 The owner/operator shall operate a solvent cleaning operation 

under the lab hoods according to the following: 

A.	 Covers shall remain closed at all times except during actual 

loading, unloading, or transfer operations. The covers 

shall be designed so that they can easily be operated with 

one hand~

- ..,-'--	 -'--'" \ .. ----_ .. _..... _,. ...._ .... _. ­ - .::ac~~ ~:-;~il a.ll d=ipping ceaEes;	 

C.	 Waste or used solvent shall be stored in covered containers 

and disposed by a method which prevents its emission into 

the atmosphere in accordance with R446-1-4.9.4.A(3)~

D.	 Tanks, containers, and all associated equipment shall be 

maintained in good operating condition and leaks shall be 

repaired immediately~

E.	 Written procedures for the operation and maintenance of the 

solvent cleaning equipment shall be posted in an accessible 

and apparent location near the equipment~

F.	 The requirements of R446-1-4.9.4.A, UAC shall apply to this 

operation as applicable. 

15.	 A copy of this AO shall be posted on site and shall be available 

to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. 

All employees who operate the air emission producing equipment 

shall receive instruction as to their responsibilities in 

operating the equipment in compliance with all of the relevant 

conditions. 

16.	 All installations and facilities authorized by this Approval Order 

shall be adequately and properly maintained. The owner/operator 

shall comply with R446-1-3.5 and 4.7, UAC. R446-1-3.5, UAC 

addresses emission inventory reporting requirements. R446-1-4.7, 

UAC addresses unavoidable breakdown reporting requirements. The 

owner/operator shall calculate/estimate the excess emissions 

whenever a breakdown occurs. The sum total of excess emissions 

shall be reported to the Executive Secretary for each calendar 

year no later than January 31 of the following year. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be 

approved in accordance with R446-l-3.1.1, UAC. 

This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any liability for 

compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations 

including the Utah Air Conservation Rules. 

Sincerely, 

Ft-~~utiveSecretary 

Utah Air Quality Board 

FBC:DC:cl 

cc:	 EPA Region VIII, Hike Owens 

Davis County Health Depar~ment

4.2.4-748 
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLC) FEB 0 5 i392 

HILL AIR FORCE BASE. UTAH 84056·5990 

Air Quality 

sFEB r~~ . 

F. Burnell Cordner 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Division of Air Quality 

1950 West North Temple 

Salt Lake City UT 84114-48~

Re: Approval Orders # DAQE-540-91, 29 Jul 91, and # BAQE-757-88, 3 Jan 89, 

Vapor Seals for JP-4 Storage Tanks 

Dear Mr Cordner 

In reference to the above approval orders, we request the following changes: 

g. Combine the above two approval orders and delete any ~eference to a 

refrigeration unit on the vapor degreaser (BAQE-757-88) in Bldg 507 since this 

process has been discontinued since spring 90. Please delete this source. 

I rbJ Combine throughputs of JP-4 storage tanks 10861, 10862, 10873, and 

10~ to give an annual throughput of 1.26 x 1~ barrels. Currently, these 

tanks have individual throughput limits. With the outage of Chevron's JP-4 

storage tanks, it's extremely difficult to receive a large inventory without 

transferring fuel between the tanks. This leads to throughput exceedence on 

an individual tank basis. However, the combined throughput for the overall 

tank farm is under the combined throughput limits. Our records CAtch 1) show 

that due to the above, throughput for the JP-4 tank 10885 was exceeded by 

25,788 barrels on 1 Dec 91. For the tank farm as a whole, we were under the 

limits by 286,610 barrels. Similarly, on 1 Jan 92, the throughput for tank 

10885 was exceeaeo by 6,717 barrels ana overall we were under ~ne limits by 

267,387 barrels. Allowing us to combine the throughput will glve us more 

freedom in fuel management while staying under the overall limit. 

We request your concur~ence Dr comments in this matter. If you have any 

questions, please feel free to contact Jay Gupta at 777-4618. 

1 Atch JAMES R. VAN ORMAN Throughput Volumes for Director 01 Environmental ~}anagem2~t 1 Dec 90 - 30 Nov 91 & 

1 Jan 91 - 31 Dec 91 

4.2.4-749 
( (
 ( o 

lI"l --I 

t'- I I .qN \--: .,f "'t 

l'i, T.-I 

li U'I [(i r f: i 'i e,:: l' ,,! I I: t', ,..; \j i tr: r·~ Lt 'n [ j 11' 1" r:;- ';It l .~I~ ..n'· .'O)t"· 

...., 

-, r- t, ~! ':j .. t ... J '-! U' en .:- " i· ~i ':I CO f'. r' q i.'! f. \ I J ·r: ! :,' I j I, ,; ''1 ," .:t [I) ~=; :~': c' 

fi L' -.! .J:' i,-: {! I· ,of- , u· !(i IJ~! .,·1 l:'·) n u: C" r .1':' C' 11 '" uJ ,~, ::: [') 0 0" t ;;.: I ",' '" (i I',' ! <> i j f I :': u···' - t· ,+ ."' ; I r:, 10 ..... " I ,j ~~: :'.0 U.i G '~J I} t·· " U' 11'} (i (·i t-, J' ~"-i I:!. ~; IJ·~ CO ~fl 1))1 -..l I .'~ :J I ,..J I -, .,-1 q- r (!'~ r· f .~! o::t n, r [, I ~'I r,	 I U r ,~-,:" ". .f! "7 l!i H· f! 1'.:' 	 Ci': t " ¢ ,- I :", en \$, "	 I l·~ T--li:'~r~ r· r·) " .....	 t ~:I ....., :;;r~

~~

"' ;~

~~ ·1 1).1 G 'j I i I; 'J t', i i UI ,-', .!) ,", r I" ~'J I)­ IJI ..J,' n tJ:i 1 j" r I,: i lJ .:' r ·n i' L: ;:' ':::' ':~" <1 

,\. ,.-"'.' ~"'" ", I

tl :I ! r t<l .U

.-. Ii 

J 

'.,,', 

f 

,;', 

!', 

,.' 

(:' 

i' I,;

1"' I

i'ii 

•

,u 

t 1,1 

r i L:-I 

.[.' I'

., ,' 

~"

.. i.': 

"1' ".,

!) 

,J)

r", r', 

rn 

0­

c:~ ,t' 

I" 

t'

'j'

',' r: 

C', .(1

I:,i •• :~

, , 

j" 

.. ',jn 

r: i ~i"

1 

1.0 

~:

rn 

,~

i

t I 

" I}· 

-n 

i:1

.-; "

I.fl

t 1'" 

,~..:' ,',. 

't •	 I . i C 

1 ,,' Ct' rl If I 1.1) <: t-, J) ~) I rt 0) 7 U) T" r, t':' 0"­ ',:,' I,') "Ij d U 0) OJ n ' I 0:: '::-' II 'fJ r:o I r C~ ... it..) T"-i ,. i 

""-..f" I,: ': t Li) ,; ii,1 h', ~"I "~I I', I,',' I' ,I t':' I~I /,', Ii I r·, <:1 t--) ·iJ fl I,) 1--" C' t ',' :.-, r,') ,{: u) .(: ,~, <:;".. ' I)' t-·) ..-~ u· .'. L I ·U U) V: 

r ,'-j i i !'1 t'~1 CJ t···, t···.' t-! ~:.' in'1 !J~! CJ 1':' '::.. lJ'.' ",1' iJ~j U': !.!) l(l 11 ' .. ; ~~! [i n ':::' i' G ':':' 0:' (I [, e,I)-' ':::' 0·· >-....	 , , .. , j .--l	 T ..

....	 II: ." ~~
 

:a r,
 

~"ot	 1.; :!: I; f'l , • j(i f, J ,! cr; !', L! l;j I' ._ !J I ·'f i , f r· I l1 OJ ! t--:' ~-I 'U J.' ·f (: ( I -: i ..--- ... i iU .' n' I t·' I ;- :!~ -: I~; C' C; L'j I i i if) .. :.,'! 

~~ , 

l!-: I (1'1	 I:;' ~I 11'1 .. 

.~~ t' Lin,	 (: r', tf'~ I" If.i (~ r.. ·. ij"; r; ···Ci -J) (U :~', r;- f' t"! ,t I', "1 ~t : t ,', U-: T' "J:j 

-t. i [I !: d Vi :: j -~ r,· 0'-- 0:: I'; ,',', ..' !J.~ (I 1.1) ':1 l! 0, d, lJ I j, ('I (; 

""--~-J I ;', Jj : 1 ~) j. ".' L-j " i· ('.~ -(t i j r I J ':.-t '":1 .J 1 t·'-I '7 r", t,,', ., ., , I U":I Ii ,: 

, :- " .. : "

I II" I !-.! t '~I r :Y; f'l '1 ~~! ij"' :(! .;: n' ;; I" IJ '.: t(~ t-!: :' .• c:. t'-, 

j,.' 

I'i I }--	 I j (! I L. .: . ~j i.; !:r 1"1" .:II it' :1 (!. t! "'- ,,

­
 ',I 111 I:J l'! :" II" II 

I-j .... 1 <1 <f
 ii, Ui I:: ! , [ '! '~I. !:: II; ,.~ - til u} '~I 1./ } " 1'1: 1'\ I:: ,-- '~ <I L._ .~~_ - - ~:! i:. ' .! I" It· I) ( , '--:-. t-:I _ I' :-- LL U_ .l:' I 1('" I
 

III I
 

II f n! u' "~i ., <~' I, r I (I' ·:t [0 C "(: D:I • I V· V' (I ''-"I r-, •• (1.1 I) c·~ C· ,.(1 ,.(I '1 t " -" t' lJ i ,,' ':j r j !', -J) ,;::, C' 

! 1 i-'j (J .. .; • i .... I ....-1 1 I ! ,-< (j .:::' r,j I', .... r.o 1-,;' ,.. oj ro r" l'-I '--:' .,... • -I I: '.:' 'I -! ... rl C~ C-~ ' 

• I 

!~ 1:( III 

~~ I' l­

\) II • " ~:.~

:.:.:.._ 1 ~r iJ'l (I, UI t' '-' 'l :;' ,', ,=:,~. l ; L ~. -I ct ,(: r -i ••! ~~ L! I r- L: I I", ., ,.' II" UI r I ' _ I"i'l l! U I, 'I ,> d d CI "J U',I lr (I': I) 

'i' " II t 1 t I oj' iI '.1 ',II [II Ii l! [; ,0 ,0 c· .... r <J In U) L-,I .J) -J) .,(. I' (; (I U'J to oci V'J ,:':.. r~ 1:0 I) ~. ~ ~

t·· ,..- t ,..- .. -I T.o ., II t· f· t (~, ,~> .... 1 ri T' T"-i, -t --I \-, r-t \-, CI ( I " .. ·i T"'" T ; 1 

I," ,~~, r t r I'! .. i ',:' .' ..,; T" -i r-l .. I .04 .... .' ....... ..,i ....... .--1 ,_.!	 ., . , .... .... r-' ....-l
 

",­

(II 

I·J 

III U
 

l'l [1'
 

1.	 III C- j t', l!1 Il,i U"J U'I _.I ,; iJ~1 lJ'j ~:' \)'1 III U"J IFI U,I If V'I Ii) U) III If' In If,: I [1'.1 [(I U'J L: UJ lJ [t,' \(::' ii" LJ'I U.I 

:J '-,I U I II r I,U 1'1:: III ITI IJ .; I tTl I.i I 1"!.1 ii J!' 11: ro to U) ft (1.1 en CC I)'; Hi (0 U' il (: CJ (u en fn fj"j rn u u U.i n: (,-, II IU en Ir! :J.: n.~ f!-~ I,:~! lit rc (fl H! II q., ill en fil !!~ 1'111(: II l r: I i I 1',-, (1.1 I)! n I, IXI ~-n ~-! ((I :~l"t "~I I,: I.i I U! III n·' U \ C'l I) \ l! 

I .j 

I',	 ,) I" 1':< r i ,·t .. ' . I I i I .. \. I 4 r I I f,' I I: Cl , " : I , !"! ' : .' !, I I I I I ! J i ' I', I I r" t ' 

L;. i I .I I l I . Ii;': I' " I I I ! . ~, I '. U: r:· J 1 i: .~J '- ,~) i. .J . i' I 4·' I I' " I i r I t·, 1'­ I! 

t L) f:l II~ ,J~ 11' iJ: l~r j' !I~ I III ii L;; rri q ,i: OJ :J~ ~-.~ j·i n 1I f: !! ',I' r:: I I ; i r:I j. j.; ,~ I IT: fl 

l' / j go/ ::u. - " 17 0/ >lNU	 XL.. &,}) >1 rI V!.L 
". ,.-;, C::O ~'l ,"" 

=- '-::

-_.­ -­ - -... ". 

1 r-' =. =- =- :­ .. ~.'-'" -'-"~

:::·0.:::. -,,-,._.' 

---,- ::-.-.-' 

'~-' ./ ,~, -, ,-..--:-' '=.' C) ,.-j =...'... - ­ .- '.­ - 7.l,~4:::

~'<,::::' \' -':;'5: : ':: : ;)49611 :::54.J.9~·

- ..... .:... . -"-' ~~;.:..; { ' .... : . .... -.,~c:'..""":'.,.-.'''''':''''" ..l. ,_. '_'_'",-'.' '_' 5SS:':: 

::', --:0 , : -'t? ,;,."_, M~\'

'::J ,=.r= .. '..•"-' 

',,-~ :..~,or::

'-'-"­

:8 - j lr-·l '-' '-'. '" 

":~'~. C 

",.=,=""7 "I -'-"-' ...

.:.• 1" 

..::. -:-:: ,=.,~r::

'... '-"-' ., 

1 '= .:::. 

: f':;:' C1 ':'1 " ' •• ' '__' Io.~

c.:"",:"",~. ..-­

i= >='~_ ...-.::;:--, .-.,:::. c-::.-=. '-',-­

-.- .•. - ~:'

::...:: .. =: e'L. ... •..., c::- r=. ,= ':=' -,' -- -­ ,-­ " ...... -t '--.­

_.. ....L '_.' .l. -. _' 

,'-,'"""'I 

..' ..... 

,',4 C','--"'" 

1='1=" ::0 ro. :~ll .. ' 3::,.:, .....:' ......., 1'1 

_' 0'':'' -\" ", ... __ J. _' ''P' :,--:1':7.""":'1' -t ,,""':""'''''':''''' -t = ..l. -to ";"'_'..l. _; 

.- ,••,C:­

~'=;'-' "·'7 • - .~ ~r.:-'

...- ,.;.. ...;;. """'-'; '._'­

;::'c':

, , - .::::4 DEC ~. '~'97342

:.:'C': 07 ,J ~:'1'~

......-:'.C' L "."":"_' 

. • I 

'•• :-'-,' "4 

-t .. -t -.-:....... 

I. '::il ':::' ':::' __ ._ :=:2L'l"l) 149 ~:':..: 3:?,~

;::'~': .~ ...;.:.. ..... t·· '::':)4556E -:--98'~'4q

./ ,-, 0:.=:-7 

.' --' .. "" ·~1~~·1 .-,­ ... ....;.._._ .l.",:", ... 

.:-~,~.; I 1,'= ... -', ::-, .::: ...... -.:::.' -:' 

-' 

..-': '.)9: ·~3E :.:-: - - .-, -''';'' "':.. '-' 

.... (' .. " 

I::" ,'::, -­ ,::.. .-' - 'Ie·" "I r:= __ ...... \-' .L. .l. .-.J 

.-. .. '_. 

_.: ..-: ..... 'r­ ~_ 1 -; 

, .-, .­ J ..... '_' . ';' .. 

,:::-i:' , , <rJ 

... '-' :,,"p.'" 

'-'f - ,-', "I c:; (. ':.' '-', -'-' ... . 

... -=:.­ I" 1'-' .-.-.~ - - , . .~ -- ':' .-.-':::' ,.. r='-:,( -.-" ..... _.'.0­ ._ .......__ 

1. .::. -, < - .. -­ "-.r .. ....,: _....,. -> _. 

·-'L .:-..:. -; ._~ .~;. - '-, 

., - -' .... - ' 

.:' ~'I .:.:.l. 

:.:' :=.1 .i.. ..... '.:.: '_' ... _ 

.... ; ,. .. . .... ~_'I ,,=:,. ' 

:-1 .. .".:"1 ,-,=-:--, 

.' ,~.

:. -' .... . --''::'':'' ..' 

-,::= ,­

':::.:' ....:. - .. : :.:::31.+,:::. ;",.-,e:.:

.... ,_., .-,L..'.=, ..._'-"-' 1.,. '..".-,; ~' 3 ;:::: c: -:' ~1·

4.2.4-751 
.
 

, 

UT V~~UMES 2Y TANK ~GR J. DEC ~(:) - 3(:, N~V 91 

TF.;::;'::OUF:CE: =- T :::'F.:TDP. TE STOP~AT~ SOTY ... ~OTY ... 

"; -:"" 1 r-, ..... .l._ 09 rJO\! 04.2639 

~1""'~LOC' 16 rlO'v' _ .r. ~.l. ~U\-' 8392E'3 - - _.. - .-. ­ -' -;-".':" .::. -- " . : 4-67<:'=·'::) 

~-:>'=I L: '_L'_',._' 28803100S !./;rfr I , • 

Z-~ 72°/ ()f)t) 

&A~NS.

ALL ~"'c 7,A-1>IK5. ;f. "::.C'8E::;::~7·3""

{ 4, 2. 97 )t 10 5.A1?f:£i.5 

.Y /. C-, 

4.2.4-752 
("') 

V) 

tI 

'<T 

N 

'<T 

L f: 

:! 

I 

.. I 

ll. 

..' 

; 

f 

111 

r, 

/ ' 

,.! 

lU 

I ~i

t::j' 

... 

~:I

.0 

u·· 

"~I Ui 

I· 

t-l' 

I~:I

I~'

I) 

I" ["·1 

I) I) ~-.I

( 1 I', 

r j 

1.1 ':, ..--i ',_.' ,_ .. 

"..' 

n 

, . 

(II !' t '~I r:.J 

I ' .. 

I.f. 

.. ' 

<:-­

'J.~

<t 

r·, 

( ; 

I, J' I' ,'! 

u· 1(1 r..r .... , Ii JUt '-j I f:.!· 

" C·I I I '.' lJ:I b') P'! r; ,'. 11.1 "f 

•.! (.! r·1 .. ~r

Iii (1"1

1<' '.~

l'-i V1 

'1 d 

r·· .j) - , 

f J

eLi 

C· 

("-1 

ct 

n· 

,.. .. ,.... 

~l

~'!

rd 

.,.-; 

D 

(0 

r') lJi () 

~t C" ~::

<;t (J (r 

i(: I)"' r, 

(J­ (I I:' 

t··) (J 

C'i 

r· 

i 

'J) 

OJ t.:' 

l~',

1.'1 

l-,! 

0 

(I 

n ·n 

W 1.1: 

r:t j.) 

r, ~.

I', (-! 

I < 'j 

Ul 

·'1 

P:! 

~-:

'to . 

( 

I 

I 

f-. 

rr 

;.., 

t·, 

r I..i 

I' C' 

C' (I T t t ... 

t! 

r 

I. J 

C j cI 

T-I 

• f (' 

r j c; 

'=:to fO ,. t··.' 

c.t ~l"

I" I '::I" 

<i t"! 

·-t ':.:' 

C' C!:! 

o· d 

/". OJ 

1.1 ., 

.:; 

:.i 

,... i r ! 

t·, cu 

/" t:' 

(I! 

j" 

OJ 

n· 

~·i

,.! 

OJ 

11: 0) rl 

lJJ 0:.::' ~~

n, t:' ..(I 

IJJ f' j G·· 

~! /""' d 

...,..--t .,...1 

')'~""' ...' 

,; 

(I 

~.

r i 

~-t

1 

,.

Iii 

,

1 I 

I· 

f ·It 

(.I c· Ti C' 

" (1 

-, 0" 

hi ., 

I' (1 

'U 'i 1.'1" r::~ -0 ·u . I 

~) ~) r~'~J

N~rot

h1 ~1 h1 •• I'! I" !', t I 

i 

O· 

("-! 

I] 

I" 

l! I 

r c"' 

("" 

I· ,~

10 n.1 I,' I·', 

,'1 01 

.::. ::: " I - I', 

(I U.I ''; " II 

,j I} i .J:: '! 

U:r .cJ 1J.l ' I I' 

I'.' V.I lJ) I, <;t 

'I t(! C I', ,.~,

I:" I 

..(1 

"' 

/-)

I·" 

~'I

I> 

,). 

-0 

Ll· 

,j) 

" 

C; ...jJ (I. 

/" o· /" 

m rT 't 

<;t I:' 'J) 

('1 I') I·) 

lJ~1 h'l lJ"l 

!i·.' r I. j I 

,to o· [j) i'-I 

I:, CI II) • I 

...... O' OJ W 

':. I':' v' /1

11-,1 t!! .;\" l~-:

r i : I! 

C (:j 

,~ c:!" 

If ~.I

U (:' ,~! ~\~~

,.; 

I I I'~

,', ,_, 

(,t ',-f 

OJ '~'

,rr -::­

n <::. 

(l' 

(! 

(") 

0 

-::/ 

t . 

..-. 

1;1 

OJ CO 

·n t··) 

0­ I·) 

" 

........ 

lJ~1

C' 

< C I! I : '.' '::' '::-' 

/' I'i' ", r· 

t· 0:! (i ;', lJ J t.;, 

:JI ". () ~~ t:' ........ I)' .... -4 l(J ,0 

f:in t·,',I)· 

...-i ..... --4 

d 

/) ~)

(1-. Co 

'1 -J) 

'.I lJ J 

0 - lJ1 

r.1 l..!1 

III 

C.I 

1 

I , I 

'.,:' 

e:J 

III 

U 

'.j 

j' 

/ 

t· 

I 

0·· U 

I) '.1 

['1 I:' 

0' [1 

" I!I I I I', 

UI .-., 

1(1 r·· 

lJl '"'.1' 

1.1' Cl 

(j n'l 

I·; 

Ii:l ~! '~ I, I I•• ' 

,~ •. j 

.:'! 'T r ,.~

: i 

I : 

I 

lJ~1

II' 

,I, 

I I' I - t 

L iii 

t I 

.::.' 1)1 

" U) ,. ,-n 

lJ I (! 

t, I I 

( \ n I 

r·· 

• t 

(I 

I', 

t'-,I 

r, c " I Ct.. 

·n .J) 

I', (l

c·j ·f; 

'.j <t 

C) 1-·· .:=-: l"; 

t··, I', 

co .::. 

q­ ~-.~

q' i.' 

<oJ OJ ~l _. 

rl t··) /' ':.-:' 

1(1 • i r i 1.:' 

tl_! T-'" ,., . 1/ 

r-~ ! 1 ojl 

r·o .. '~-I

I) ':', -il 

I""j 

li.l 

"-::t1.1', 

r~

I " 

.. 

n·· 

".1' 

.!.' 

':1 

7 

0.": 

·u 

u 

(;. 

Li' I) 

<'!" ffl 

I, D" 

r: n· ,-:"I 

'-:.' J."' j IJ.: 

(".~

'.-.1 

t·:, 

<: 

_ f: 

t .1 I 

r· r'· 

·0 10 

t··, ,. 

~,iLU

o· 

r 1 .j 

(i.l C! 

!-, ( r:' 

-t j 

t:i J ·n ct· 

[J"J. t·'! 'T 

'" ~. '~:I (~. t· r·l 0" ~~

,. lJ] lJ] t·:' Ti n··t'..· I)" 

I 

.1 

I.; 

,I 

~/

fr~

-.1 

t ~I

L, . 

("J 

I 

I 

' ..I 

:~ :( 

0) (> 

;, 

...t· 

II 

.. , . 

.t. 

,. oct 

I" I 

t".I 1-) 

,-1 

... 

I' 

t 

, I 

f;, 

11 I 

1).1 0­

,or 

( I /) 'r,'. 

LL 

<C 

lJ I 

,,' 11 

I ~_ II. 

'1' 

n 

(j ..t_ 

':'­ ::L <:I 

0 

I J 

<t 

(; I

\., 

? '-"1 t" I 

>- ;::' ~~

...1 I ~--:

' I:' t·:, t ".\ ,_., () 

:._­

., 

'J I I '-:, 

., 

(I '--1 ,. o't 

Z _.J .:::t:-:I 

t"") ..--) 

I···· ...... ••­ ..... , 

OJ 

., I 

,) 

..-t rt .. " 

D (1 r I 

_ J I I. l! -, Illl,; r:: ~-' (1.1 LJ.i ~:

j. ",I 

lJl 

t·.' 

T i 

'J" ,....(1 

,.~, .. :' 0' 

..:.. ::..~

"r. 1. '1'

,") ":.1 r-', 

I· lJl •., I I 

.,,:. ;::: 

'i '1' 

'") ~j

rei '" 

',' ':.' 

(11 11 j 

iJ! Ii! 

!I lJ 

(I t', ,I • , 

1:(. ,::. 

C (': 

:;-.: 

.•) C' G .; 1·1 (1 

fll In Ii.: 

LI lLJ <1" 

lL LL }~

(I 

I I 

u:: 

<t" 

}~"

(~ CI II 

til 

f--. 

2·...L 

'I. I" 

~"

'." 

fn 

U"J 

I, 

I' 

~I

.. 

'I' T -t • ' 

t. u· 

f 1 C, .,.-t , I 

.... .f 

t:i 

•. J 

.... -t 

...... ·1 ,- -t .... -t r I ~. t 

d <J' lJ'l lJ) I)­

-J)..j) ,I) \I) <I' T'"""i .....-i ....­ t (", t,) 

, . 

',,,' 1"1.1 (1 

·00 0::' 

<") •. " •. , 

,., ....... ...--t

-(I /., r~ C' _ • .-l 

,'. r 1 <,t lJ-J lJ) IJJ T 1 T'"" T '"' .·1 T" -i ... -. 

,., T' 

f' j c;t' 

..(I .J) 

... -t ....-.. 

,." I ·,-1 ,~ • i 

~-'I n·· OJ O· 

-{l 1'-, (J­ O· ....... .... -t ....... ,...... 

,~ ..

, • I 

'i' II~I 0'. ((t 

lJ I lJ'l <:t U:I 

r I r t -.1 t) ...... ".-t 

,.:, <j 

,.

':" 

.,..i 

lJJ 

...- -t 

,,]. 

•• f-J 

e, (":. 

..jJ 

.,... i T 

fl lJ') t:' 

t':o VI '"~

C> ': I C' 

<) 

<1 

(" 

·D 

'J 

(" •., T tor'" 

.-1 ...... CJ 

lJ) III ~l

c' I~-::' '~~I

1.1.1 

I" lJ) 

1­ "-i 

1­

;;,~

<.1: 

II 

CL 

:J 

D 

PI 

(,1 t, lJ) 

-I) r OJ 

CO n, en 

lJ~1 U.l to _ J In 

0.1 (lJ OJ O. rn 

(I I en IYI (I. ,(\ 

lJ.I d 

OJ .(1 

rl.! (!I 

~J

OJ 

en 

~~I lJJ lJ) lJ) lJ~1

m 01 I)) (0 D:I In ~'p :':1. n, [II 

~'J I!~I

0) CD 

0) rn 

~::

(n 

ru 

U) ~'J Ifi ~)

rn OJ OJ (II 1i.1 I.I! f(: fO 

...1 

Ii 

(I. 

_J 

0 

(I 

lJ~1

0) 

rn 

_. 

n 

n 

lJ) 10 lJ.I IJ) In In ~)

0) m rn 0) 01 m lU 'T: rn 1:.1 In 0:, 1.11 n', 

~-, lil _! 

0', nI Ij. 

0.1 1)"1 ,', 

l'~1 ~'"j 111 

OJ (0 (I I 

1"-' 1.\.1 OJ 

':.1 

I' 

I 

I, I

" "

f; i 

r i ..­ i 

,n ,·r, 11'1 IJ! 

\-1 

"I 

ril 

r t 

..j; 

Ifl 

T·I 

.. n 

\l'1 

wi" 

·f! 

1.\ I 

, 'i , I 

·JI .j"! 

In ,,'; 

" t .,...t 

H·I) 

(r! fi I 

II (, II II "1 

·n '(1 '!: (1'11 

0' ,"II UI I~i !!' 

1.1 (,J (I "1 1:1 

·Ii ,n ·.1) ·u ·n 

I.U P,I O~.1 l~J fi1 

fl 

.J) 

(0 

(,1 

~O

I'~'l

f'j I I 

't.: ·n IJ: f': 

l'j II C'I 

n "'U 11 

1"1"1 IJ'~ fl"l 

11 

.J,; 

Ii: 

I'! 

'U 

U: 

("1 

-0 

ru 

'-'1 

,f.j 

fi i 

I', 

/. 

IP 

I" 

I' 

r,; 

I' 1'1" 

I, I' t· r'., I.:J 10 

I:' 

I 

I ;"1 

'1.1 

, ' I! !i! 

I.' 

t , 

I!I ,i 

I:' 1"' 

r f', 

I,: iTl 

I~'

f" 

iJl 

( \ 
'-:-. of 

J".. =.. .... - ,-. -'-'. , 

, .. 

.- .-,c.-" ..:.-, _ _"_'.L. '._' .._ 

.. c ..•, ...-, '-, --=.;,:,::,,,,,,,,:- .. - .. t':"".":' - -- -.. ". ~.)2 .... I - "", .>- _. _'''''''T ..: _

.:. -' -'. ,-'...:.. .. ._'~':::'''''

-,..,~ :=,.=._1 '.1. " '05=-=' :=' =.=~ . "-'t."'" \:' : ,~- i .- -"-' ":34 :C4°b:: .. -:-'.:... .. ('C::C:::-:-.-.--::' =~.::,.-:, ... ,_.. _._. ..;.;.. _.'-' .... '-"-' 

.... r: "":'I __ """T ..... 

°90::::::: .~,={-,~'7,Qt::" .-,,- .. - '"'l -=,-- _::"L .. '.' -'_._' 0393'==,c J.. - _ ......,.. 

=,~=: 'l! L. 0 1 C, .... 1 p •• -l ..•,-" of "i .."-.1
 _._.~ L '-' '- ,.~ .. '-' ... •_~~.L. .. _'.-:­ ='/"":'I''''''':'''~; - .:. '~-' '-' / ~_

1 of """7''''''''''1 .-\ t':"" -:'":=' ':":' ::·c.:: - -.' ...::.. ... '_'._'..L.' -'-'-' .. ...,. '=' ;: If -:' --:: '7 ,.e., ;~ ...., ::,85 .L _ / '_' '_'1-. ._., '_'-I 

:::'oc::: 1189 ()9 -'-"-' .. -,t::"'-, ''::'-:'" ._.'.e.,:':"

.•... _,,_. .... ..:--....;..:­

. - ,:,:. .~-:--:- .:::. 1 '-"-' .. 

: '::'i .. -.. -, --. ,.
 

. -.;-/. -, -.,.
 ,-, ..... 

, r ,.~ .l. .. :..! ,_. 1_,.- ' 

,-:--'- . ,-, I'\',-t, ~:' '-"_.,',-:::'­ 1. '_''':-'_' .:.. . :~:. ::'~...::. -'_ _' ""':" 'l! "",-,1; :3::4 J ''''._' , ~: 3':;'5-4

._'.- .. :334 ,::,:07~. :.
 

.,..:-...... -, 1349 0013=< 75559
 

'=,,..,-.-.-.'""':\ (:'01 ::-,5 =' '_. __..................
 ••' '-' ..i. - '7~+.~, ~>::'=(:): -=l~

'-' ..' - '~'t.t I 

='C::'L lOOt:. ~)7 \"';Af'.~ :762575 

c.=oC" =,::., 26 .~: Af'~ ._'-'­

,=, '-- '=':::-

'-'.- =='L 103,:: ()t. F::'=· .-,,,,,,,;" , :.'.1:"- r= ':: -: 1 .-. .:. .-,t':"",-, .' 

... '." .....' ' .."_....... -'­ - "-'-':::' - _.>­

'.'-: '-,.:=- 1 ="'7~ '-::: -;7 .::-' '=:- 1 ..._'-' ... '-- . 

-.-:=­

'1-l""'7C'~1C"

....... J. '_'..L ....._.
 

1 "I ,'.',~ --. 1 ;-:-:-.:-=--:- i _..i. ,_•.. _ ...... . ........
 - -,= - "",1 - :- , of '" ­

... .1.. ' 

.... '":"L • -""7r:..--:-""""'I- .....,.. _.,,":,'=- ­ :=. :':. = .... _'-' .J. ,_" _ ••'..:....' ...:..._.... '-' 

= c,~c:.-,=··-::: ='i e_' _'. ...••._. 

--= 1 L.~, ,-: ,~, .::' 5 9 ( 

of 1 .. 0::::-"'""' ....,""""'1-, ..

..=...,. =::'L _',' - '-- ...... '.' ............ _.
 

~..:. ='1
 ......... '-' ..' ._~ -' ... 

1176 

1185 : 85~SS.~,

1 i... "'T' 'i : ! 96 ... '--' '-' --'­ '-''""':\1 {-·.Ge,a : ~.·+7(:c'"7 ............ '.' . L.-"_ :. l)t·32·=? 
 

':".: ,:::'! -, ....... '-', -l .--,
 

10 

J.'_' S13S,::,9 ~" ')b77';'; 

..:..i 44S3~):3 17:25479 

SEF' : 75()3'36 :488('78. 

-" :230171 

~278 '-lr-'­ 06 '..::_- . 1834,::48 : ()1 (r978 

4.2.4-754
 
't.1~.'~·':: -'~ . 

'-:' .. 

-~ I. ''::,; ..... i 

._' ,,-" .. ,.,,·~o -:~ ,:::,. \:i .-: .:.."';"''';L' _.' -' "-. ,,""'­

',::'''':''" '1 -~:""

-' ~. ,,' ._. 

,=..7C'-:-,·:':,1­ c·=" '_' _' ..... ..J._, 

=C,I 1 -:"",-,""" '-:" .~:. ;-·1[11 ...: ..-:...;.;. / 4,S70=':' 

~341

1812~'::(:'

:~:::>=;"='::'i: =~I:;;r

-."::', t 

, L ..-~' .• '.- ~., .-:,.= ...t. ••.J'._ 

4.2.4-755
 
BAQE-235-91 ~,

Don RobEinsen 

'1'hrouqh~

Proal Dale Chapman, Environmental Engineer ~~

oatet February 13, 1992 

Hill Air Force Base request for Approval Order changes 

On February 5, 1992 the Division received a letter from Hill Air 

Force Base requesting changes to two of their existing approval 

orders. These changes include: 

a.	 Remove the perchloroethylene vapor degreaser and
 

associated vapor chiller (this equipment has been
 

removed) from approval order dated January 3, 1989
 

b.	 Combine the approval orders dated July 29, 1991 and
 

January 3, 1989.
 

c.	 Combine the JP-4 tank throughput limitations to give an 

annual throughput for all four tanks combined. Present 

approval order conditions limit throughput by 

ind-ividual tank. 

There will not be an emission increase as a result of these 

changes. Therefore a Notice of Intent for these changes is not 

necessary. The revised approval and the current approval orders 

are attached for your review. 

By combining the two listed Approval Orders all of the four JP-4 

storage tanks will be included on one permit. This is the most 

logical grouping and is consistent with other approval order 

groupings issued by the Division. 

Existing approval orders for the four JP-4 tanks limit throughput 

for each tank (condition 10 and SD existing AO). The total 

permitted throughput for all four tanks is presently 1,260,000 

barrels per year. ...-.., 

42.4-756 
- .. 

working losses from organic storage tanks are dependent upon the 

total number of turnovers (total throughput)r not the specific 

tank that is used. Therefore combined throughput limitations can 

be made for the four JP-4 tanks without changing the potential 

emissions from working losses. 

There should be no confusion about the meaning of "total combined 

throughput" for these tanks. The total combined tank throughput 

is the sum of individual tank throughputs. Calculation of the 

throughput in this manner accounts for the transfer of fuel 

between tanks (ie: not just the flow into or out of the tank 

farm). 

I have included condition 4b on the attached "revised" approval 

order which is intended to clarify the meaning of total combined 

throughput for these four tanks. Individual tank throughput is 

measured and recorded daily (condition 4F) r but throughput limits 

are for the sum of all four tanks. All other conditions were 

taken from the current approval orders . 

...-,..... 

4.2.4-757
 
'- ... -- - ­ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BAQE-324-90 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 

);onn&n H. BURn.er 8ut eau 01 Air Qualltv ljowPftOr 

288 Nonn 1460 West .:luz.nne Dando,.. M.D.. M.P.H. 

PO 80x 16690 

KrnneLh L.. Alkema . , San Lake Cllv ulan 841 16·0690 

O'f"ftIDF .j IB01l5J8-<il08 

May 23. 1990 

Newspaper Agency 

Salt Lake Tribune 

Legal Advertising Department 

157 Regent Street 

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 

Gentlemen: 

This letter will confirm the authorization to publish the attached NOTICE in 

the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News on May 26, 1990. 

Please mail the invoice and affidavit of publication to the Utah Sta te 

Department of Health, Division of Environmental Health. Bureau of Air 

Quality, P.o. Box 16690. Salt Lake City. Utah 84110-0690. 

Sincerely, 

"\ }'\ 7-4 "
 /\.. (', -',~ '- , i \ . fl· \..,. / I -.~

- .. .." 

Carol Holmes 

Office Technician 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Enclosure 

4.2.4-758
 
NOTICE
 

The following notice of ~~tent t~ construc:, submitted in accordance with 

Section 3.1, Utah Air Conservation Regulations, has Jeen received for 

consideration by the Executive Secretary, Utah Air Conservation Committee: 

1.	 Utah Fuel Company, modification to coal storage facility at 

Skyline Coal Mine, Carbon Coun~y CDS A2 

Increased emissions for this modification are calculated at the 

following values: 

0.02 ton/yr 

Par~ic'..llate 0.05 tonlyr 

2.	 Departmen~ of the Air Force, installation of steam boilers, vapor 

seals for J?-4 storage tanks, waste hydraulic fluid reclamation 

units, a pain: spray booth, lab hoods, and a paint spray hangar 

at Hill AFB, Davis County, CDS A 

Increased emissions for these modifications are currently 

calculated at the following values: 

Part.ic'..llate 1. 34 tons/yr 

PM lO 1.34 tons/yr 

S02 10.79 tons!yr 

NOx 8.31 tons/yr 

CO 8.60 tons/yr 

VOC 21.47 tons/yr 

The engineering evaluations and air quality impact analyses has been 

completed and no adverse air ~uality impacts are expected. :t is the intent 

of the Executive Secretary to approve the constr'..lction projects. 

The construction proposal and estimates of the effect on local air quality 

are available for public inspection and comment at the Bureau of Air Quality, 

Utah State Department of Health, 288 North 1460 West, Salt Lake City. 

4.2.4-759 

1 
Utah 84116-0690. Written comments received by the Bureau. 288 North 1460 .­

West. P.O. Box 16690. Salt Lake City. Utah 84116-0690, on or before June ~8,
 

~990 will be considered in making the final decision on the approval or
 

disapproval of the proposed construction.
 

If anyone so requests within 15 days or publication of notice. a hearing will
 

be held in the area of the proposed construction. installation. modification.
 

relocation. or establishment.
 

Date of Notice: May 26. 1990
 

4.2.4-760 

2 
UTAH BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY
 

NEW/MODIFIED SOURCE PLAN REVIEW
 

,~Ot-'::J~

NaeieR-G. Currier
 

Director, Environmental Mgt Office
 

Department of the Air Force
 

Headquarters Ogden Air Logistics Center (AFLC)
 

Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056
 

RE:	 5 Projects - Installation of Steam Boilers, Vapor 

Seals for JP-4 Storage Tanks, Waste Hydraulic 

Fluid Reclamation Units, a Paint Spray Booth, Lab 

Hoods, and a Paint Spray Hangar at the Hill AFB, 

Davis County, CDS A 

DATE: April 23, 1990 

NOTICES OF INTENT DATED: November 7, 1989, January 19, 1989, August 9, 

1989 July 18, 1898, 1989, and November :22, 1989 

respectively
 

PLANT CONTACT: Jay Gupta
 

PHONE NUMBER: 777 - 7651
 

PLANT LOCATION: Hill Air Force Base, Davis County
 

FEES:
 

Filing Fee $ 100.00 

Review Engineer - Consultant $6,660.50 

Consultant $ 000.00 

Modeler - 00 hours at $18.07/hour $ 000.00 

Computer Usage Fee $ 000.00 

Notice to Paper $ 24.00 

Travel - 00 miles at $0.23/mile y 000 00

Total $6,784. SO
 

Review Completed By Tetra Tech/L.Carl Broadhead r0
 

APPROVALS:
 

Engineering Unit Manager OK s-/sht?
 c 

Technical Evaluation Section Manager__~)~11~~.~\42~'~_':~0~tJ~\~_~~/~t~O~!~'~1°~Z_' __ I t 

BACT and Approval Order Coordination with Source
 

(Date/Contact and Agree or Disagree) 5-1-90 I Bill / bv Carl B"
 

4.2.4-761
 
I.	 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 

The Department of the Air Force has filed notices of intent dated November i, 1988, January 19. 

1989, June 16, 1989, August 11, 1989, August 30, 1989, and November 22, 1989. They are proposing 

to install, modify, and operate steam boilers, vapor seals for JP-4 storage tanks, waste hydraulic fluid 

reclamation units, a paint spray booth, lab hoods, and a paint sp;-ay hangar, respective to those dates. 

The description of each notice of intent is as follows: 

1.	 Steam boilers, consisting of two (2) 100,000 pounds per hour, 120 psig packaged steam boilers 

in total heat input rate of 120.328 million Btu per hour for natural gas combustion (primary 

fuel) with a standby diesel fuel (116.542 million Btu per hour), to expand the existing steam 

plant. The location of this expansion will be in Building 260 at Hill Air Force Base. The 

steam generators are equipped with a flue gas recirculation system which is designed to 

recirculate 20 percent of exhaust gas resulting in 60 percent reduction in NOx emissions. The 

flue gas recirculation system is designed to operate only for natural gas combustion, not for 

the standby diesel fuel combustion. The steam generators are also equipped with an 

economizer system for an exhaust gas heat recovery. In addition. this expansion replaces 3n 

existing 180 gallons per minute boiler feedwater pump with a new 600 gallons per minute 

pump. To account for emissions from standby diesel fuel combustion in total boiler 

emissions, the diesel fuel utilization is assumed to be 10 percent (%) of annual boiler 

operation. The use of diesel fuel is dependent upon the availability of natural gas. The 

following numbers describe the operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours 4300 hours per year; 

B.	 Total boiler capacity - 120.328 million Btu per hour for natural gas combustion; 

116.542	 million Btu per hour for diesel fuel combustion; 

C.	 Diesel fuel utilization 10 percent of annual boiler operation; 

D.	 Flue gas recirculation 20 percent: 

E.	 Nox emissions ­ 18 ppm at 100 percent boiler capacity for natural gas 

combustion; 

25 ppm at 25 percent boiler capacity for natural gas combustion: 

F.	 Volume of each boiler - 1900 cubic feet. 

2.	 Vapor seals for JP-4 storage tanks, consisting of dual seals for tank number 10873 and 10885, 

to reduce fugitive VOC emissions from the tank. The location of these tanks is the tank farm 

at Hill Air Force Base. The installation of dual seals results in hydrocarbon emission 

reduction at a rate of 0.17 pound per hour or 0.73 ton per year which are requested to be 

banked for future offset credits. 

The tank 10885 is currently operating under an approval order issued on February 15, 1978. 

Tank capacity is 55,000 barrels with a dimension of 93 feet diameter and 52 feet height. The 

proposed modification for this tank is to replace the existing aluminum pan with a ncw stecl 

pan and the existing single rolled rubber sectional seal with a dual seal mounted one above the 

other. 

Tank 10873 capacity is 25,000 barrels with a dimension of 63 feet diameter and 50 feet 3 

inches height. The proposed modification for this tank is to replace the existing foam log seal 

with a dual seal mounted one above the other. 

For both tanks, the new primary seal will be a resilient foam log with impregnated fabric. The 

secondary seal will be rim mounted, weather guard, continuous tip, complete with 

4.2.4-762 
compression channel, compression plate, plate gasketing and ground shunt. Seals extend 

continuously from the floating roof to the tank wall. 

The following numbers describe the operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 8760 hours per year 

B.	 Annual throughput - 660,000 barrels for tank 10885
 

300,000 barrels for tank 10873
 

C. Reid vapor	 pressure - 3 psia 

3.	 Bldg 514, Waste hydraulic fluid reclamation units, conslstmg of two portable hydraulic f1uid 

reclamation units manufactured by Pall Corporation or equivalent complete 'With vacuum 

process chamber, controls, and condensers, to reclaim solvent from the fluid and hence reduce 

hazardous wastes. This project is part of the Air Force Base Hazardous Waste Minimization 

Program's intent to reduce its hazardous waste disposal. These units will be initially installed 

in Building 514. At later time, these units will be deported to and utilized in the other 

locations in effort to reclaim and reduce hazardous wastes from the other locations in the base 

This project will reduce 95 percent of contaminants in the hydraulic f1uid waste. The 

contaminants of hydraulic fluid waste consist of 1,1,1 trichlorethane, freon 113, and lP-4 jet 

fuel. The reclamation process involves a vaporization of contaminants and then vapor 

condensation at the water cooled condenser. The hydraulic fluid waste contains 15 percent 

contamination. The condenser in the unit will recover· 95 percent of the vapor solvents. The 

recovered solvents will be recycled for reuse. Total process rate is 30,000 gallons of waste per 

year or 4,500 gallons of contaminants per year. The following numbers describe the 

operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 2080 hours per year 

B.	 Annual throughput - 30,000 gallons 

C.	 Exhaust VOC concentration - 2.5 ppmv 

D.	 Exhaust flow rate - 20,000 cubic feet per minute 

E.	 Stack height - 25 feet. 

4.	 Bldg 5N, Paint spray booth and lab hoods, consisting of a 4 feet by 4 feet spray booth with 

the open face and two (2) 9 square feet lab hoods with the open face, to use circuit board 

repair and the application of conformal coating on circuit cards and to clean printed circuit 

boards using organic solvents. The location of this installation \vill be in Building 5 Bay K 

The paint spray booth is relocated from Building 214. Workload for the spray booth from 

Building 214 has been transferred to Building 100. The booth is equipped with dry paint 

arrestor filters, an exhaust fan and an 18-inch diameter vent. The hood is equifJped with 

exhaust plenum, fan and vent. The exhaust vents from jab hoods are combined into one (1) 

exhaust stream. 85 percent of the solvent will be recovered and recycled. The following 

numbers describe the operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 2080 hours per year 

B.	 Annual usage rate 50 gallons per year of urethane compound
 

5 gallons per year of miscellaneous paint
 

300 gallons per year of xylene cleaning solvents
 

100 galJons per year of an aliphatic cleaning solvents 

300 gallons per year of Isopropyl JJcohol clc3.;Jing SiJo·. ::~s

c.	 Exhaust face velocity 100 feet per minute 

3 

4.2.4-763 
D.	 Exhaust flow rate - 1,600 cubic feet per minute for the spray booth 

1,850 cubic feet per minute for the lab hoods (in total) 

E.	 Stack height - 30 feet for the spray booth
 

25 feet for the lab hoods.
 

5.	 Bldg 220 Paint spray hangar, consisting of modular turboclean chambers complete v,lth 

pumps; nozzles, associated piping, controls and sludge disposal, to modify the existing paint 

spray hangar. This modification is required for a replacement of corroded existing paint 

hangar waterfall troughs and pipings. The location of this modification will be in Building 

220. The aircraft paint hangar in Building 220 is in existence since the 50's which does not 

have an air quality permit nor does it require one. In conjunction v.ith this modification, 

Department of the Air Force also proposes to substitute solvent base primer v,lth water 

reducible primer and to replace the conventional type spray gun v.ith a high volume low 

pressure (HVLP) type spray gun. The primer substitution and spray gun replacement will 

result in reductions for VOC emissions due to less solvent contained in the water reducible 

primer and an increase in paint transfer efficiency. The solvent content for the water 

reducible primer is 2.8 pounds per gallon versus 5.8 pounds per gallon for the solvent based 

primer. In addition, HVLP spray gun transfers efficiency is 60 to 70 percent whereas 30 to 

40 percent for the conventional spray gun. The modified paint spray hangar can 

accommodate up to three aircrafts for painting at one time by splitting the painting areas into 

three using movable partitions. There will be a total of 9 units including 2 exhaust fans [Ier 

unit. The follov.ing numbers describe the operation: 

A.	 Annual operating hours - 2080 hours per year 

B.	 Annual usage rate - 4600 gallons per year of polyurethane compound 

1600 gallons per year of water reducible primer 

625 gallons per year of nitrocellulose lacquer 

650 gallons per year of miscellaneous 

C.	 Exhaust face velocity - 100 feet per minute 

D.	 Exhaust flow rate - 18,500 cubic feet per minute per fan
 

333,000 cubic feet per minute in total
 

E. Stack height -	 52 feet. 

II.	 EMISSION SUMMARY 

The total emissions from	 sources listed in this Approval Order will be as follows: 

This is not a total for all	 sources at Hill Air Force Base. The current allowable permited emiSSIons 

are not	 totaled at this time. 

Particulate	 1.34 tons/year 

PM,o	 1.34 tons/year 

SD.?	 10.79 tons/year 

NO.	 8.31 tons/year 

CO	 S.lin cons/year 

VOC	 21.47 tons/year 

4.2.4-764
 
Hill requested banking of the emissions from the JP-4 tanks but the overal emissions from this group 

of sources consumed those emissions and so the banking of emissions is denied. 

III. BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACf) ANALYSIS 

BACf will be required at all emission points. This includes the following points: 

A. Boiler plant 

B. JP-4 storage tanks 

C. Waste hydraulic fluid reclamation 

D. Paint spray booth and lab hoods 

E Paint spray hangar. 

Boiler plant 

Sox and Nox emissions from the boiler plant expansion are of the highest concern. 

In the event natural gas is not available to Hill AFB, Department of the Air Force proposed to use the 

diesel fuel as standby fuel. The diesel fuel combustion contributes the majority of boiler's Sox 

emissions due to the high sulfur content. 10 percent of annual operating hours using diesel fuel is 

assumed for accounting diesel fuel combustion emissions in total boiler emissions. These Sox 

emissions can be eliminated or significantly reduced by utilizing as much natural gas as possible. 

Various control technologies can be utilized in effort to minimize the Nox emissions from the 

combustion process. Control technologies are Low-Nox designed burner, flue gas recirculations, 

selective catalytic reduction, and selective non-catalytic reduction. Implementation of these control 

technologies are often not economically practical. For example, initial capital cost for selective 

catalytic reduction is $6,525 per million Btu-hr in 1981 dollars. In addition, operating cost for 

selective catalytic reduction is $870 per million Btu-hr in 1981 dollars. 

The Department of the Air Force has proposed 20 percent flue gas recirculation in part of the 

proposed boiler plant expansion which result in 60 percent NOx emission reductions for natural gas 

combustion. Based on manufacture guarantee, NOx emission is 0.028 lb/million Btu, 18 ppm. 

The proposed flue gas recirculation is considered as BACf. Boiler and flue gas recirculation must 

be properly maintained and operated in good working condition, ensuring the proposed reductions. 

Properly maintained and operated boiler will also be beneficial to VOC and CO emissions. For diesel 

fuel combustion, use of fuel which meets the sulfur standards established in the UACR is required. , 

For fuel oils the standard is 05 % by wt. Natural gas must be utilized in maximum; natural gas must 

be used as fuel whenever natural gas ,is made available at the Hill AFB. 

The proposed firing of natural gas with restricted use of diesel fuel is recommended as having applied 

Bact for minimum emissions. 

lP-4 storage tanks 

lP-4 storage tanks, 10873 and 10885, are currently equipped with a single seal. In efforts to reduce 

VOC emissions from JP-4 storage tanks for the future offset credits, the Department of the Air Force 

voluntarily proposed an installation of dual seals. This modification is similar to a modification 

already made on JP-4 storage tank 10861 and 10862. The VOC reduction from the storage tanks and 

the hanger 221 paint booth is less than the total emissions from all sources so there are no emissions 

reductions of VOCs to bank. . 

5 

4.2.4-765 
BACT for the JP-4 storage tanks is proper installation, maintenance, and operation of dual seals on 

the lP-4 storage tanks. Dual seals must be properly maintained and kept in good condition at all 

times to prevent excess emissions from the lP-4 storage tanks. 

These seals are recommended to be approved as having applied BACT. 

Waste hydraulic fluid reclamation 

A condenser for recovering 95 percent of the solvents removed from the fluid is proposed in a parr 

of this project. This is considered as BACT for the waste hydraulic fluid reclamation. No other 

options were reviewed. 

This process is recommended as having applied BACT. 

Paint spray booth and lab hoods 

VOC emISSIOns from the paint spray booth and parts cleaning under the lab hoods can be further 

controlled through a carbon adsorption unit. Installation of the carbon adsorption unit is not 

economically practical, especially with modest VOC emissions; 0.18 lb per hour for paint spray booth 

and 0.29 lb per hour for the lab hoods. Cost effectiveness was calculated by Hill AFB to be $48,900 

per ton of vec emissions. Recommended BACT for paint spray booth and lab hoods is the 

minimization of emissions through good operating pra~tice. As proposed, 85 percent of solvent use 

in the lab should be recovered and recycled. The dip tank covers shall remain closed at all times 

except during actual loading, unloading or transfer operations. Parts shall be completely drained in 

the internal draining rack until all dripping ceases. Waste or used solvent shall be stored in covered 

containers and disposed of by a method which prevents its emission into the atmosphere. Tanks, .-" 

containers and all associated equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition and leaks 

shall be repaired promptly. Written procedures for the operation and maintenance of the solvent 

cleaning equipment are posted in an accessible and apparent location near the equipment. Paint 

particulate emissions from the spray booth is controlled by dry filters. All air exiting the booth shall 

pass through this control system before being vented into the atmosphere. The dry filter must be 

properly maintained and kept in good condition at all times. 

The installation of filters and a limitation on the amount of paint used IS recommended as having 

applied BACT. 

Paint spray hangar 

VOC emissions from the paint spray hangar can be further reduced through a carbon adsorption unit. 

Installation of a carbon adsorption unit is not economically practical. Cost effectiveness was 

calculated by Hill AFB to be $52,480 per ton of VOC emissions and_ is considered an exceSSIve cost. 

As BACT for this project, the Department of the Air Force proposed a substitution of high solvent 

content epoxy polyamide primer with low solvent content water reducible primer. In addition, the 

conventional paint spray gun is replaced with high transfer efficiency "High Volume Low Pressure" 

paint spray gun. The paint substitution will result in 2.4 tons vec emissions reduction per year. 

The recommended BACT for a paint spray hangar is the use of low-VOC solvent paints and high 

transfer efficiency paint spray gun; this BACT control measure is already included in the proposed 

modification. No other options for voe emissions were reviewed. Paint particulate emissions from 

the spray hangar is controlled by water falls. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control .-... 

6 

4.2.4-766 
system	 before being vented into the atmosphere. 

IV.	 APPLICABLE UTAH AIR CONSERVATION REGULATIONS (UACR) 

These notices of intent are for modifications to an existing installation. It is nor a major modification. 

The following federal and state regulations have been examined to determine their applicability ro 

this nouce of intent: 

1.	 Section 3.1.1, UACR - Notice of intent required for modifications. This regulation 

applies. 

2.	 Section 3.1.8, UACR - Application of best available control technology (BACT) 

required at all emission points. This regulation applies. 

3.	 Section 3.1.9, UACR - Rules for relocation of temporary sources. This source is a 

permanent source. Therefore, this regulation does nor apply. 

4.	 Section 3.1.10. UACR - Additional information requirements for a major new source 

or major modification which emits precursors of ozone and impact an area of nonattainment for ozone. Notices of intent do not represent a major new source or a 

major modification. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 

5.	 Section 3.2, UACR - Particulate emission limitations for existing sources which are 

located in a non-attainment area. The existing installation is listed in this regulation 

for 36 boilers with a limitation of 20% opacity. Therefore, this regulation does apply. 

6.	 Section 3.3.1, UACR - Emission limitation for a new source which is located in a 

non-attainment area or which impact a non-attainment area. These notices of intenr 

do not represent a new major source, but additional new sources at an existing 

installation and minor modifications. Therefore, this regulation will apply. 

7.	 Section 3.3.2, UACR - Review requirements for new major sources or major 

modifications which are located in a non-attainment area or which impact a nonattainment area. Notices of intent do not represent a new major source or a major 

modification. Therefore, this regulation will not apply. 

8.	 Section 3.5, UACR - Emission inventory reporting requirements. This regulation 

requires any source which emits 25 tons or more per year of any pollutant ro submir 

an emission inventory to the Bureau of Air Quality every year. This source musr 

comply with this regulation. 

9.	 Section 3.6.5(b), UACR - Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) review 

requirements for new major sources or major modifications. Notices of intent do nor 

represent a major source or a major modification under PSD rules. Therefore, rhis 

regulation does nor apply. 

-,­

10. Section 3.8, UACR - Stack height rule. This regulation limits the creditabk height 

cf stacks to that heigh~ determined to b: go~d er:g:ncc~in; practic:. T!~c L::~::::..:!2.S

7 

4.2.4-767 
used to determine good engineering practice are found in 40 CFR 51.1. A de minimus 

height of 65 meters (213.2 feet) is allowed. These notices of intent do not have stacks 

which exceed 65 meters in height. It is in compliance with this regulation. 

11.	 Section 3.11, UACR - Visibility screening analysis requirements. This regulation 

requires all new major sources or major modifications to undergo a visibility screening 

analysis to determine visibility impact on any mandatory Class I area. Notices of 

intent do not represent a new major source or a major modification under UACR 

rules. Therefore, this regulation does not apply. 

12.	 Section 4.1.2, UACR - 20% opacity limitation at all emission points unless a more 

stringent limitation is required by New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or 

BACT or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). 

BACT will require a lower limitation than 20%, therefore, this regulation does not 

apply. 

13.	 Section 4.1.9, UACR - EPA Method 9 to be used for visible emission observations. 

This regulation applies. 

14.	 Section 4.2.1, UACR - Sulfur content limitations in oil and coal used for combustion. 

.This source burns fuel oil. The limitation is 0.85 pounds of sulfur per 1cP BTU heat 

input. This regulation applies, howevcr, BACT for diesel oil limits sulfur to a lower 

value. 

15.	 Section 4.7, UACR - Unavoidable breakdo\\'I1 reporting requirements. This regulation 

applies. 

16.	 Section 4.9, UACR - Review requirements for volatile organic compound (VOC) 

sources located in a non-attainment area for ozone. This regulation covers the 

following processes: 

A.	 Petroleum liquid storage 

B.	 Petroleum liquid transfer/storage 

C.	 Control of hydrocarbon emiSSions In refineries
 

1) vacuum producing systems
 

2) wastewater separators
 

3) process unit turnaround
 

4) catalytic cracking units
 

5) safety pressure relief valves
 

6) leaks from petroleum refinery equipment
 

D.	 Degreasing and solvent cleaning operations
 

1) cold cleaning facilities
 

2) open top vapor degreasers
 

3) conveyorized degreasers
 

E.	 Cutback asphalt 

F.	 VOC used for various processes
 

1) paper coating
 

2) fabric and vinyl coating
 

3) metal furniturc coating
 

4) large 3f)f)liancc surfac ~o3ting
 

5) magnct wire coating
 

6) QaL wood ..:ua'ing
 

8 

4.2.4-768 
7) misc. metal parts and products 

8) graphic arts 

G.	 Synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing 

H.	 Perchlorethylene dry cleaning plants. 

This source is located in a non-attainment area for ozone as defined in the State 

Implementation Plan. The proposed modification includes petroleum liquid storage 

and cold solvent cleaning which are subject to this regulation. The provisions 

pertaining to petroleum liquid storage applies to Subpart Kb to the proposed 

modification due to the true vapor pressure of stored liquid 1.3 psia. This regulation 

applies	 for the cold solvent cleaning operation. This source must comply 'With this 

regulation. 

17.	 Section 5, UACR - Emergency episode requirements. This regulation applies. 

18.	 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) - There IS no 

NESHAPS for these notices of intent. 

19.	 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) - This source is located in a nonattainment area for ozone. The Bureau of Air Quality guidelines do not call for this 

source to be modeled for any pollutants. The Bureau has found through experience 

that, because of the small increase in quantity of emissions involved and the 

conservative predictions made by modeling, a source or emission point of this small 

increase is very unlikely to cause a new violation of the NAAQS. 

20.	 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) - The NSPS which apply to these notices 

of intent is the NSPS Kb for petroleum liquids storage vessels. The vapors pressure 

and capacity parts of Kb make it applicable to the storage tanks. 

V.	 RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ORDER CONDITIONS 

1.	 Department of the Air Force, located at Hill Air Force Base, shall install. modify, and operate 

the steam generators, dual vapor seals on JP-4 storage tank 10873 and 10885, waste hydraulic 

fluid reclamation units, a paint spray booth, lab hoods, .and a paint spray hangar according 

to the information submitted in the notices of intent dated November 7, 1988, January 19, 

1989, June 16, 1989, August 11, 1989, August 30, 1989, and November 22, 1989, respectively, 

and the additional information submitted to the Executive Secretary dated February 2, 1989, 

January 10, 1990. 

2.	 The approved installation shall consist of the following equipment: 

A.	 Two (2) steam generators, a total heat input rate of 120.328 million Btu/hr with 

natural gas as primary fuel with a standby diesel fuel (116.542 million Btu/hr) at the 

Building 260; 

B.	 Dual seals for JP-4 storage tank 10873 and 10885; 

c.	 ,We) (2) waste hydraulic fluid reclamation units at the Building 514; 

.:J.	 :';;.:::~ 3p:-ay oooth and two (2) lab hoods at the Building 5 N; 

9 

4.2.4-769 
E.	 Nine (9) Turboclean chambers for the paint spray hangar at Building 220. In addition, .­

solvent base primer shall be substituted for water reducible primer and a high volume 

low pressure (HVLP) type spray gun shall replace the conventional paint spray gun. 

3.	 VISible emISSIOns from any point or fugitive emission source associated with the installation 

shall not exceed 10% opacity. Opacity observation of emissions from stationary sources shall 

be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. 

4.	 The following operation limits shall not be exceeded without prior approval In accordance 

with Section 3.1, UACR: 

A.	 Steam generators 

1.	 465.7 billion Btu of natural gas per 12 month period 

2.	 1083 million Btu of natural gas per hour 

3. 50.1 billion Btu of diesel fuel per 12 month period 

4.	 116.5 million Btu of diesel fuel per hour 

5.	 4,300 hours per 12 month period 

B.	 JP-4 storage tank 10873 

1.	 300,000 barrels per 12 month period 

2. 24 hours per day 

3. 8,760 hours per 12 month period 

c.	 JP-4 storage tank 10885 

1.	 660,000 barrels per 12 month period 

2. 24 hours per day 

3. 8,760 hours per 12 month period 

D.	 Hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units 

1.	 30,000 gallons of total fluid per 12 month period 

2. 8 hours per day 

3. 2,080 hours per 12 month period 

E.	 Paint spray booth 

1. 50 gallons of urethane per 12 month period 

2. 5 gallons of miscellaneous per 12 month period 

3. 8 hours per day 

4.	 2,080 hours per 12 monlh period 

F.	 Lab hoods 

1. 200 gallons of xylene per 12 month period 

2. 100 gallons of naphtha aliphatic per 12 month period 

3. 300 gallons of isopropyl alcohol per 12 month period 

4. 8 hours per day 

5.	 2,080 hours per 12 mc::.th period 

10 

4.2.4-770 
G.	 Paint spray hangar 

1. 4600 gallons of polyurethane per 12 month period 

2. 1600 gallons of water reducible primer per 12 month period 

3. 625 gallons of nitrocellulose lacquer per 12 month period 

4. 650 gallons of miscellaneous per 12 month period 

5. 8 hours per day 

6.	 2,080 hours per 12 month period. 

Compliance with the limitation shall be determined on a rolling monthly total. On the first 

day of	 each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the previous 12 months. 

Records of production shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Records 

of production shall be made available to the Executive Secretary or his representative upon 

request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the request. Fuel 

consumption for steam generators shall be determined by the use of records from a fuel meter. 

VOC emissions shall be determined by maintaining a record of paints, solvents, and lP-4 fuel 

used. The records shall be kept on a daily basis. Hours of operation shall be determined by 

supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an operations log. 

5.	 The condenser at the final point of hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units shall be in 

operation during the operation of hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units. If the condenser 

is out of service, the hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units shall not be used until the 

condenser has been returned to service. The condenser shall be capable of recovering 95 

percent of solvents from the fluid. Records of solvent recovery shall be kept for all periods 

when the hydraulic fluid waste reclamation units are in operation. The record shall include 

the following items: 

A.	 Date 

B.	 Unit usage (start and end times) 

C.	 Total hydraulic fluid waste processed 

D.	 Amount solvent recovered. 

Records of treatment shall be made available to the Executive Secretary upon request and 

shall include a period of time equal to the entire duration of the project. 

6.	 The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel and #2 diesel fuel as a backup 

fuel in the steam generators. If any other fuel is to be used, an approval order shall be 

required in accordance with Section 3.1, UACR. Natural gas consumption shall not exceed 

465.7 million frJ of natural gas per 12 month period and diesel fuel consumption shall nO[ 

exceed 5% of the annual fuel used in the boilers without prior approval in accordance with 

Section 3.1, UACR. Compliance with the limitation shall be determined on a rolling monthly 

total. On the fIrst day of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using the 

previous 12 months. Records of fuel consumption shall be kept for all periods when the plant 

is in operation. Records of fuel consumption shall be made available to the Executive 

Secretary upon request, and shall include a period of two years ending with the date of the 

request. Fuel consumption shall be determined by the use of records from the fuel meter. 

7.	 The sulfur content of any diesel fuel burned shall not exceed 0.5 % by weight of sulfur 

determined by ASTM Method D-4294-89. The sulfur content shall be tested if directed bv 

the Executive Secretary. 

8.	 The paint spray booth at Building 5N shall be equipped with a set of paint arrestor particulate 

11 

4.2.4-771 
m.ters to control particulate emISSIons. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control -


system before being vented into the atmosphere. 

9.	 The paint spray hangar at Building 220 shall be equipped with a water wall to control 

particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before 

being vented to the atmosphere. 

10.	 The following density and volatile organic content of paint shall not be exceeded without 

prior approval in accordance with Section 3.1, UACR: 

A.	 Paint spray booth 

Paint Density Clbs/gallon) vec (% bv Vol) 

Urethane 8.5 80 

Miscellaneous 6.0 100 

B.	 Paint spray hangar 

Paint Density Clbs Iga lion) vec Clbs/gallon) 

Polyurethane 9.2 4.7 

Epoxy Polyamide Primer 10.5 5.8 

Water Reducible Primer 8.9 2.8 

Nitrocellulose 8.0 4.8 

Miscellaneous 9.0 6.0 

These parameters shall be tested if directed by the Executive Secretary using the 

appropriate ASTM method or another method approved by the Executive Secretary. 

11.	 The owner/operator shall operate a solvent cleaning operation under the lab hoods in the 

following manners: 

A.	 Cover shall remain closed at all times except during actual loading, unloading or 

transfer operations; 

B.	 Parts shall be completely drained in the internal draining rack until all dripping 

ceases; 

C.	 Waste or used solvent shall be stored in covered containers and disposed of by a 

method which prevents its emission into the atmosphere; 

D.	 Tanks, containers and all associated equipment are maintained In good operating 

condition and leaks are repaired immediately; and 

E.	 Written procedures for the operation and maintenance of the solvent cleaning 

equipment are posted in an accessible and apparent location near the equipment. 

12.	 Eighteen months from the date of this approval order the Executive Secretary shall be notified 

in writing of the status of construction of these projects unless the construction is complete 

and operation has commenced. 

13.	 A copy of this approval order shall be maintained on-site and available to the operators of the 

equipment. 

12 

4.2.4-772 
14.	 All installations and facilities authorized by this approval order shall be adequately and 

properly maintained. 

15.	 The Executive Secretary shall be notified in writing upon start-up of the installations, as an 

initial compliance inspection is required. 

Any future modifications to the equipment approved by this order must also be approved In 

accordance with Section 3.1.1, UACR. 

This approval order in no way releases the owner or operat<;>r from any liability for compliance v.;th 

all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including the Utah Air Conservation 

Regulations. 

"Allowable emissions" as defined in Section 1.12, UACR, for point sources listed in this Approval 

Order are calculated at 1.34 tons/yr for particulates, 1.34 tons/yr for PM,o, 10.79 tons/yr for S~, 8.31 

tons/yr for NO., 8.60 tons/yr for CO, and 21.47 tons/yr for VOC. These calculations are for the 

purposes of determining the arplicabiliry of PSD and non-attainment area major source requirements 

of the UACR. They are not to be used for purposes of determining compliance. 

LCB/Hill-ALL.ENG 

13	 4.2.4-773 
.OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

NET 

FEB-21-90 

10:07 AM 

SOURCE: NET EMISSION INCREASE ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB 

SOURCE voe NOX SOX eo PM10 TSP UNIT 

PRE-MODIFICATION •.•••••.•.••.• 

POST-MODIFICATION .••••.•..••.. 

22.52 

21.47 

2.64 

8.31 

3.43 

10.79 

2.73 

8.60 

0.43 

1.34 

0.43 

1.34 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

NET EMISSION INCREASE ••...•.•. ·1.05 5.67 7.36 5.87 0.91 0.91 TONS/YR 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

-

-


4.2.4-774
 
.wLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

NET 

,EB-21-90 

10:07 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR 

LOCATION: HILL AFB 

EMISSION 

FORCE 

ESTIMATE 

SOURCE VOC NOX SOX CO PM10 TSP UNIT 

REPLACEMENT BOILERS - 260 ...•.. 

SEALS ON JP-4 TANKS .•.•..••.... 

~ASTE HYD FLUID RECLAIM -514 ••. 

CLEANING HOODS/PAINT BOOTH - 5N 

PAINT HANGER MODIFICATION - 220 

0.21 

2.32 

0.00 

0.00 

19.99 

2.64 3.43 2.73 0.43 0.43 TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TOTAL .........••..•..•....••.. 22.52 2.64 3.43 2.73 0.43 0.43 TONS/YR 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

~ACEMENT BOILERS - 260 

~S ON JP-4 TANKS 

wASTE HYD FLUID RECLAIM -514 

CLEANING HOODS/PAINT BOOTH - 5N 

PAINT HANGER MODIFICATION - 220 

4.2.4-775
 
-


JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIHATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

NET 

FEB·21·9D 

10:07 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB 

ESTIMATE 

SOURCE VOC NOX SOX CO PM10 TSP UNIT 

REPLACEMENT BOILERS' 260••.... 

SEALS ON JP-4 TANKS .••...•.••.• 

WASTE HYD FLUID RECLAIM -514 ... 

CLEANING HOODS/PAINT BOOTH - 5N 

PAINT HANGER MODIFICATION - 220 

0.67 

1.59 

1.13 

0.49 

17.59 

8.31 10.79 8.60 1.34 1.34 TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TONS/YR 

TOTAL .....•.•..•......•.•••... 21.47 8.31 10.79 8.60 1.34 1.34 TONS/YR 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

REPLACEMENT BOILERS - 260 

, ON JP-4 TANKS 

HYD FLUID RECLAIM ·514 

CLEANING HOODS/PAINT BOOTH - 5N 

PAINT HANGER MODIFICATION - 220 

.-... 

4.2.4-776
 
ROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

BOILER 

FEBUARY 20, 

12:10 PM 

1990 

SOURCE: TOTAL EMISSION ESTIMATE (90"4 NATURAL 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - STEAM PLANT 

GAS ~ITH 10% DIESEL FUEL FIRED) 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOORLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••••••.•••. 

PM-10 ............................................ 

SOx ..........••.•.•••••••.•. 

NOx •••....•.•••••••••••••.•. 

CO •.••..•.•.•..••••..••••••• 

VOC, NON·METHANE .•••.••••••. 

vec, METHANE. .•..••••...•••. 

2.27 

2.27 

99.13 

20.02 

8.37 

0.50 

0.40 

0.29 

0.29 

12.49 

2.52 

1.06 

0.06 

0.05 

1.34 

1.34 

10.79 

8.31 

8.60 

0.67 

0.70 

0.04 

0.04 

0.31 

0.24 

0.25 

0.02 

0.02 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

60 OR 0 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

2.27 

2.27 

99.13 

20.02 

8.37 

0.50 

0.40 

1.34 

1.34 

10.79 

8.31 

8.60 

0.67 

0.70 

SOURCE: 

NATURAL GAS 

DIESEL FUEL 

FIRED 

FIRED 

BOILER 

BOILER 

(90%) 

(10%) 

4.2.4-777
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

BOILER 

FEBUARY 20, 

12:10 PM 

1990 

SOURCE: NATURAL GAS FIRED BOILER (90X) 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB . STEAM PLANT 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ••••••••••• 

PM·10 ........................................... 

SOx •••....•..••.•••.••..•... 

NOx ••••.•••.•...•••••••••••• 

CO •••....•••.••....••.••.... 

VOC, NON-METHANE •••.•••••••. 

VOC, METHANE .....••..•••.••• 

0.60 

0.60 

0.07 

3.37 

4.21 

0.34 

0.36 

0.08 

0.08 

C.Ol 

0.42 

0.53 

0.04 

0.05 

1. 16 

1.16 

0.14 

6.52 

8.15 

0.65 

0.70 

0.03 

0.03 

0.00 

0.19 

0.23 

0.02 

0.02 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.60 

0.60 

0.07 

3.37 

4.21 

0.34 

0.36 

1. 16 

1. 16 

0.14 

6.52 

8.15 

0.65 

0.70 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 1 EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SOURCES 

'~TURAL GAS COMBUSTION 

1.4-1 UNCONTROLLED EMISSION FACTORS 

~uc~ TYPE: NATURAL GAS 

FOR NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION 

EMISSION FACTOR IN LB PER MILLION CUBIC FEET 

TOTAL PARTICULATE ..•........ 

PM- 10 .........••..•.•...... 

SOx •..............•......... 

NOx •.•..•..........•••.•..•. 

CO •..............•.•.•••.••• 

VOC, NON-METHANE ...•.•..•••. 

VOC, METHANE ••..••••.••••.•• 

5.0'0 

5.00 

0.60 

0.03 

35.00 

2.80 

3.00 

LB/MM 

LB/MM 

LB/MM 

LB/MM 

LB/MM 

LB/MM 

LB/MM 

FT3 

FT3 

FT3 

BTU 

FT3 

FT3 

FT3 

TABLE 1.4-' 

TABLE 1.4-1 

TABLE 1.4-1 

BOILER MANUF. 

TABLE 1.4-1 

TABLE 1.4-1 

TABLE 1.4-1 

TOTAL POYER RATING •.••.•.• 

HOURLY FUEL CONSUMPTION ... 

ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION •.. 

OPERATING FACTOR . 

120328.00 

0.12 

465.67 

90 

K BTU/HR 

MM FT3/HR 

MM FT3/YR 

% 

FROM NOI 

(TOTAL POYER RATINGl/(1000 BTU/FT3)/(MM) 

(TOTAL POYER RATINGl/(1000 BTU/FT3)/(MMl* 

(ANNUAL OPERATING HOURl*(OPERATING FACTOR) 

FROM NOI, DEPENDING ON THE AVAILABILITY OF NATURAL GAS 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy ....••..•.•.. 

DAYS PER YEEK •.•.•.•...••. 

YEEKS PER yEAR . 

HOURS PER yEAR ........•... 4300.00 

HRS/DAY 

DAYS/YEEK 

IJEEKS/YR 

HRS/YR FROM NOI 

- 4.2.4-778
 
)LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: BOILER 

DATE: FEBUARY 20, 1990 

TIME: 12: 10 PM 

SOURCE: DIESEL FUEL FIRED BOILER (10%) 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB . STEAM PLANT 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

TOTAL PARTICULATE •••••.••.•• 1.66 0.21 0.18 0.C1 0.00 1.66 0.18 

PM-10 .......................................... 1.66 0.21 0.18 0.01 0.00 1.66 0.18 

SOx ......•...........•....•. 99.06 12.48 10.65 0.31 0.00 99.06 10.65 

NOx ..•.•.••...••.••..•..••.• 16.65 2. I0 1.79 0.05 0.00 16.65 1. 79 

CO .•.....• : ..•••.••••..•.••. 4.16 0.52 0.45 0.01 0.00 4.16 0.45 

VOC, NON-METHANE .........•.. 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 O. i 7 0.02 

VOC, METHANE. .....•...•••••. 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 1 EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SOURCES 

,'--­ 'UEL OIL COMBUSTION 

1.3-1 UNCONTROLLED EMISSION FACTORS FOR FUEL OIL COMBUSTION 

.• L TYPE: DIESEL FUEL #2 

EMISSION FACTOR IN LB PER THOUSAND GAL 

TOTAL PARTICULATE. •........• 2.00 LB/K GAL TABLE 1.3-1 

PM -1 0 .•••.••••••••••.•••••• 2.00 LB/K GAL TABLE 1.3-1 

SOx .................•....... 0.85 LB/MM BTU SECTION 4.2 OF UACR 

NOx ; . 20.00 LB/K GAL TABLE 1.3-1 

CO ...........•.••..•........ 5.00 LB/K GAL TABLE 1.3-1 

voe, NON-METHANE ••..•......• 0.20 LB/K GAL TABLE 1.3-1 

VOC, METHANE. . 0.05 LB/K GAL TABLE 1.3-1 

TOTAL POI.JER RATING .•.•.•.. 116542.00 K BTU/HR FROM NOI 

HOURL Y FUEL CONSUMPTION •.. 0.83 K GAL/HR (TOTAL POI.JER RATING)/(0.14 MM BTU/GAL)/(1000) 

ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPT ION •.• 178.98 K GAL/YR (TOTAL POI.JER RATING)/(0.14 MM BTU/GAL)/(1000)* 

(ANNUAL OPERATING HOUR)*(OPERATING FACTOR) 

OPERATING FACTOR .••....... 5 % FROM NOI, DEPENDING ON THE AVAILABILITY OF NATURAL GAS 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy ............. HRS/DAY 

DAYS PER IJEEK ....•........ DAYS/IJEEK 

IJEEKS PER yEAR ........•... IJEEKS/YR 

HOURS PER yEAR ............ 4300.0C HRS/YR FROM NOI 

4.2.4-779 
~OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

JP-4 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: NET EMISSION ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

FORCE 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC 

VOC 

non 

non 

METHANE 

MATHANE 

(PRE-MOO) " 

(POST-MOO) . 

0.53 

0.36 

0.07 

0.05 

2.32 

1.59 

0.07 

0.05 

0.00 

0.00 

0.53 

0.36 

2.32 

1.59 

NET EMISSION -0.17 -0.02 -0.73 -0.02 0.00 -0. '7 -0.73 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

4.2.4-780
 
~OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

JP-4 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

EMISSION 

FORCE 

ESTIMATE 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.53 0.07 2.32 0.07 0.00 0.53 2.32 

SauCE INCLUDED: 

TANK 10873 - SINGLE SEAL 

TANK 10885 - SINGLE SEAL 

4.2.4-781
 
.OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: 

SOURCE: TANK 10873 - SINGLE SEAL 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

HOURLY 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC 

VOC non METHANE 0.12 0.02 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.3 STORAGE OF ORGANIC LIQUIDS 

EQUATION 3 TOTAL LOSSES FROM FLOATING ROOF TANKS 

PAINT TYPE: INTERNAL FLOOTING ROOF 

LBS/YR = EOUATION 3 FROM PG. 4.3-15 

LOSS ...•..•••..•.•••• 1090.55 LBS/YR 

LR (RIM SEAL LOSS) = EQUATION 4 FROM PG. 4.3'16 

LR •..••...•.•..••••.••••••• 418.53 LBS/YR 

KS ....•••••••.••••..•• 3.00 

V ••••••••••••••••••••• 8.00 MPH 

n . 0.00
 

P ••••••••••••••••••••• 0.03
 

D ••••••••••••••••••••• 63.00 FEET 

MV •......•....•• _.. _.. 80.00 LB/LB-MOLE 

KC •.••...•••.•••.••••. 1.00 

LIJ .•.••.••••..•••.•.••••..• 43 _11 LBS/YR 

o .. _............•••... 300000.00 BBL/YR
 

C ••••••••••••••••••••• 0.0015 bbl/ft 2 

IJL . _......•••. _..•.... 6.40 LBS/GAL 

D •••••••••••••••• _•••• 63.00 FEET 

NC ...•..•.•••.•.••..•. 0.00 

Fe •. _••••••••••••••••• 1.00 

Lr ...............•.•.••...• 628.91 LBS/YR
 

FF •••••••••••••• _••••• 284.00 LB-M/FT YR 

-


FILE: JP-4 

DATE: FEB-14'90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

ANNUAL 

TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

0.55 0.02 0.00 0.12 0.55 

LR+LIJ+LF+LD 

SEAL FACTOR (LS-MOLE/CFT"(MI/HR)'N"YR», FRO"'. TAaLE 4.3-4 ­

LIQUID MOUNTEO RESILIENT SEAL IJITH RIM MOUNTED SECONDARY SEAL 

AVERAGE IJIND SPEED AT TANK SITE, FROM NOI 

SEAL RELATED IJIND SPEED EXPONENT 

(PT/PA)/CC1+Cl-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE C12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR IJEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

«0.943)"O"C"IJL/D)"(1+(NC"FC/D» 

THROUGHPUT (bbl/year), FROM NOI 

SHELL CLINGAGE FACTOR (bbl/l000 ft2), AP-42 TABLE 4_3-5 

AVERAGE ORGANIC LIQUID DENSITY (LB/GAL), FROM AP-42, TABLE 4.3,2 

TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

NUMBER OF COLUMN, NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-19 

EFFECTIVE COLUMN DIAMETER, NOTE 4 PG. 4.3-19 

FF"D"P"MV"KC 

TOTAL DECK FITTING LOSS FACTOR 

4.2.4-782 
p .•••••••••••••••••••• 

MV .•.•••••••.•.••..... 

KC 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

L8/L8-MOLE 

(LB-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM NOI 

(NF1*KF1)+(NFZ*KFZ) ••.. + (NFN*KFN) 

(PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)AZ) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA =AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (1Z.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR HOLECULAR WEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

LD ••.•....•••..••••••••••.• 0.00 LBS/YR 

KD .••..••.•.••..•••.•. 

SD ...•..•.........••.. 

o ...........•..•...... 

P ••••••••••••••••••••• 

MV ......•......•...... 

KC 

0.00 

O.ZO 

93.00 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

L8-M/FT YR 

FT/FT2 

FEET 

L8/L8-HOLE 

DECK SEAM LOSS PER UNIT SEAM LENGTH FACTOR 

WELDED DECK 

(LB'MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM Ap·4Z, PG. 4.3-Z5 

DECK SEAM LENGTH FACTOR (FT/FTZ), FROM AP-4Z, FG. 4.3-25 

TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

(PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)AZ) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3,6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPKERIC PRESSURE (1Z.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR WEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy· ..•.•••.•..... 

DAYS PER ~EEK ..•..••••.•.•. 

~EEKS PER YEAR .•.•••••..•.. 

".-., PER YEAR . 

24 

7 

5Z 

8736 

HOURS/DAY 

DAYSNEEK 

WEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS/YEAR 

FRCt1 NOI 

FRCt1 NOI 

FRCt1 NO! 

(HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/WEEK)*(IJEEKS/YEAR) 

•.",,­

4.2.4-783
 
,LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: JP-4 

OATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TANK 10885 - SINGLE SEAL 

COMPANY NAME: OEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

HOURL Y ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.41 0.05 1. 78 0.05 0.00 0.41 1.78 

Ap·42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.3 STORAGE OF ORGANIC LIQUIDS 

EQUATION 3 TOTAL LOSSES FROM FLOATING ROOF TANKS 

PAINT TYPE: INTERNAL FLOOTING ROOF 

LBS/YR = EQUATION 3 FROM PG. 4.3-15 

LOSS •.•••••••. _•••••• 3550.32 LBS/YR LR+LI./+LF+LD 

LR (RIM SEAL LOSS) = EQUATION 4 FROM PG. 4.3-16 

LR •••.•••.•••.••••••••••••• 1379.83 LBS/YR KS*V~n*P*D*HV*KC

KS ....•••..•••••..•••• 6.70 SEAL FACTOR (LB-MOLE/(FT*(MI/HR)~N*YR», FROH TABLE 4.3·4 ­

LIQUID HOUNTED RESILIENT SEAL \.11TH RIM MOUNTED SECONDARY SEAL 

V ••••••••••••••••••••• 8.00 MPH AVERAGE \.lIND SPEED AT TANK SITE, FROM NOI 

n ••.•.•••• •• _••• _•• 0.00 SEAL RELATED \.ICND SPEED EXPONENT 

P ••.•••••••••••••••••• 0.03 (PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)~0.5)~2)

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

D ••••••••••••••••••••• 93.00 FEET TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

MV .... _.•••. _..••••••• 80.00 LB/LB-MOLE AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR \.lEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

KC ....••••••••••••••.• 1.00 PROOUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

UJ .••.•••.••••••• _. _••••.•• 64.25 LBS/YR «0.943)*Q*C*\.IL/D)*(1+(NC*FC/D» 

Q ••• - ••••••••• _ ••••••• 660000.00 BBL/YR THROUGHPUT (bbl/year), FROM NOI 

C ••••••••••••••••••••• 0.0015 bbl/ft 2 SHELL CLINGAGE FACTOR (bbl/100D ft2), AP-42 TABLE 4.3-5 

I./L ....•.•••.•••.•.•.•. 6.40 LBS/GAL AVERAGE ORGANIC LIQUID DENSITY (LB/GAL), FROM AP-42, TABLE 4.3-2 

D •••••••••• _• _•••• _••• 93.00 FEET TANK DIAMETER, FRHO NOI 

NC ...•..••.....••••.•. 0.00 NUMBER OF COLUMN, NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-19 

FC .•...•..•••••••.•••. 1.00 EFFECTIVE COLUMN DIAMETER, NOTE 4 PG. 4.3-19 

LF ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 803.85 LBS/YR FF*D*P*MV*KC 

.= F •••••••••••••••••••• 363.00 LB-M/FT YR TOTAL DECK FITTING LOSS FACTOR 

4.2.4-784 
P ••••••••••••••••••••• 

MV .....•.••••••••.••.. 

KC 

LO .•••••.••••••••••••.....• 

KD •••.•••••.•••••••••• 

so •••••••••••••••••••• 

o ••..••••••.•••••.••.• 

P ••••••••••••••••••••• 

MV •••••••••••••••••••• 

KC .•..••••••••••.•.... 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy •.••.••••••.•. 

DAYS PER IJEEK ••••.••.•••.•• 

IJEEKS PER YEAR ••••••.•••••• 

..-...,S PER YEAR ••••.•.•.••.. ,"'---'.'. 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

1302.40 

0.34 

0.20 

93.00 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

24 

7 

52 

8736 

LB/LB-MOLE 

LBS/YR 

LB-M/FT YR 

FT/FT2 

FEET 

LB/LB-MOLE 

HOURS/DAY 

OAYS/IJEEK 

IJEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS/YEAR 

(LS-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM NOI 

(NF1*KF1)+(NF2*KF2) •••• + (NFN*KFN) 

(PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA =AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR \.lEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

DECK SEAM LOSS PER UNIT SEAM LENGTH FACTOR 

(LS-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM Ap·42, PC. 4.3-25 

DECK SEAM LENGTH FACTOR (FT/FT2), FROM AP-42, PG_ 4.3-25 

TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

(PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR IJEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

(HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/IJEEK)*(IJEEKS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-785
 
~OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

o 

o 

o 

SOURCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

ESTIMATE 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOORLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % C~TRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.36 0.05 1.59 0.05 0.00 0.36 1.59 

SauCE INCLUDED: 

TANK 10873 - DUAL SEAL 

TANK 10885 - DUAL SEAL 

4.2.4-786
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: JP-4 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TANK 10873 - DUAL SEAL 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.09 0.01 0.40 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.40 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.3 STORAGE OF ORGANIC LIQUIDS 

EQUATION 3 TOTAL LOSSES FROM FLOATING ROOF TANKS 

PAINT TYPE: INTERNAL FLooTING ROOF 

LBS/YR = EQUATION 3 FROM PG. 4.3,15 

LOSS .•••••.•••••••••• 791.15 LBS/YR LR+L'oJ+LF+LD 

(RIM SEAL LOSS) = EQUATION 4 FROM PG. 4.3-16 

LR ....•..•.••.••.••..•..•.• 223.22 LBS/YR KS*VAn*P*D*MV*KC 

KS .•...•...•.•...•.••• 1.60 SEAL FACTOR (LB-MOLE/(FT*(MI/HR)AN*YR», FROM TABLE 4.3-4 ­

LIQUID MOUNTED RESILIENT SEAL ~ITH RIM MOUNTED SECONDARY SEAL 

V ••••••••••••••••••••• 8.00 MPH AVERAGE 'WIND SPEED AT TANK SITE, FROM NOI 

n . 0.00 SEAL RELATED ~IND SPEED EXPONENT 

P •••••••••••••••••••• _ 0_03 (PT/PA)/(1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)AZ) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA =AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

D ••••••••••••••••••••• 63.00 FEET TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

MV ..............•..••. 80.00 LB/LB-MOLE AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR ~EIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

KC .•......••.......•.. 1.00 PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

L'W _ _ . 43.11 LBS/YR «0.943)*Q*C*'WL/D)*(1+(NC*FC/D» 

Q . 300000.00 BBL/YR THROUGHPUT (bbL/year), FROM NOI 

C ••••••••••••••••••••• 0.0015 bbL/ft 2 SHELL CLINGAGE FACTOR (bbL/1000 ft2), AP-42 TABLE 4.3-5 

'WL •.....•........•.... 6.40 LBS/GAL AVERAGE ORGANIC LIQUID DENSITY (LB/GAL), FROM AP-42, TABLE 4.3-2 

D ••••••••••••••••••••• 63.00 FEET TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

NC ............•....... 0.00 NUMBER OF COLUMN, NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-19 

FC ............•••..•.. 1.00 EFFECTIVE COLUMN DIAMETER, NOTE 4 PG. 4.3-19 

LF ...............•.•...•... 524.83 ~BS/YR FF*D*P*MV*KC 

FF .. 237.00 LB'M/FT YR TOTAL DECK FITTING LOSS FACTOR 

4.2.4-787 
P .•••••••••••••••••••• 

MV .....•••••••••.••••• 

KC 

0_03 

80.00 

1.00 

LB/LB-MOLE 

(LB-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM NOI 

(NF1*KF1)+(NF2*KF2) •••• + (NFN*KFN) 

(PT/PA)/((1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT =TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR ~EIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

1· 

LD .•••.•.•••••••••.•••••••• 0.00 LBS/YR 

KD ••.•••••••••••••••.• 

so •...•••••••••••••••• 

o ........•••...•••••.. 

P ••••••••••••••••••••• 

MV ...••••••••••••••••. 

KC 

0.00 

0.20 

63.00 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

LB-M/FT YR 

FT /FT2 

FEET 

LB/LB·MOLE 

DECK SEAM LOSS PER UNIT SEAM LENGTH FACTOR 

\lElDEO SEAM 

(LB-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM AP-42, PG. 4.3-25 

OECK SEAM LENGTH FACTOR (FT/FT2), FROM AP-42, PG. 4.3-25 

TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

(PT/PA)/((1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA =AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR ~EIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAY .•.......•••.. 

DAYS PER ~EEK .••.•••••••••. 

,"",cKS PER YEAR ..••••••••••• 

) PER YEAR •••.••••••••• 

24 

7 

52 

8736 

HOURS/DAY 

DAYS/~EEK

~EEKS/YEAR

HOURS/YEAR 

FROM NO! 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

(HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/\lEEK)*(~EEKS/YEAR) -

4.2.4-788
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: Jp-4
 

DATE: FEB-14-90
 

TIME: 9:00 AM
 

SOURCE: TANK 10885 - DUAL SEAL 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - TANK FARM 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 0.27 0_03 1.20 0.03 0.00 0.27 1.20 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.3 STORAGE OF ORGANIC LIQUIDS 

EQUATION 3 TOTAL LOSSES FROM FLOATING ROOF TANKS 

PAINT TYPE: INTERNAL FLOOTING ROOF 

LBS/YR = EQUATION 3 FROM PG. 4.3-15 

LOSS .•••••••••..•••.. 2395.92 LBS/YR LR+LI.'+LF+LD 

(RIM SEAL LOSS) = EQUATION 4 FROM PG. 4.3-16 

LR .........••..••..•..•.•.• 329.51 LBS/YR KS"V~n"P"D"MV"I(C
 

KS ....•...••••.•.•...• 1.60 SEAL FACTOR (LB-MOLE/(FT"(MI/HR)~N"YR», FROM TABLE 4.3'4 ­

LIQUID MOUNTED RESILIENT SEAL IIITH RIM MOUNTED SECONDARY SEAL 

v ...........•......... 8.00 MPH AVERAGE I.'IND SPEED AT TANK SITE, FROM NOI 

n .•.•••.••••••••.••••• 0.00 SEAL RELATED IIIND SPEED EXPONENT 

P ••••••••••••••••••••• 0.03 (PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)~0.5)~2)

PT ='TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM Nor 

o . 93.00 FEET TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

MV ......••.••.•...•... 80.00 LB/LB-MOLE AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR I.'EIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

ICC .......•....•...•... 1.00 PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

LII •........••..••.••.....•. 64.25 LBS/YR «0.943)"Q"C"IIL/D)"C1+(NC"FC/D»
 

Q ••••••••••••••••••••• 660000.00 BBL/YR THROUGHPUT (bbl/year), FROM NOI 

C ••••••••••••••••••••• 0.0015 bbl/ft 2 SHELL CLlNGAGE FACTOR (bbl/1000 ft2), AP-42 TABLE 4.3·5 

ilL •••••••••••••••••••• 6.40 LBS/GAL AVERAGE ORGANIC LIQUID DENSITY (LB/GAL), FROM AP-42, TABLE 4.3,2 

D ••••••••••••••••••••• 93.00 FEET TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

NC _ . 0.00 NUMBER OF COLUMN, NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-19 

FC .. _ _...•....•.•.• 1.00 EFFECTIVE COLUMN DIAMETER, NOTE 4 PG. 4.3'19 

LF _..••....... 699.77 LBS/YR FF"D"P"MV"ICC
 

: F ••••••• _•••••••••••• 316.00 LB-M/FT YR TOTAL DECK FITTING LOSS FACTOR 

4.2.4-789 
P ••••••••••••••••••••• 

MV ...••.•.•.••••.••••. 

KC 

LD ...••...••.•.••.•.•.•...• 

KD •••.•••••••••••••••. 

so .•••••••••.••••••••• 

o ..•..••..••.•....•... 

P ••••••••••••••••••••• 

MV •....•....••..•••..• 

KC 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAY ••••••••••.••• 

DAYS PER UEEK •.••.••.•..•.. 

~JrrKS PER YEAR ••••••••••••• 

. PER YEAR ....•....••.. 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

1302.40 

0.34 

0.20 

93.00 

0.03 

80.00 

1.00 

24 

7 

52 

8736 

LB/LB-MOLE 

LBS/YR 

LB-M/FT YR 

FT/FT2 

FEET 

LB/LB'MOLE 

HOURS/DAY 

DAYS/UEEK 

UEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS/YEAR 

(LB-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM NOl 

(NF1*KF1)+(NF2*KF2) •... + (NFN*KFN) 

(PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSlA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSIA), FROM NOI 

AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR UEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

DECK SEAM LOSS PER UNIT SEAM LENGTH FACTOR 

(LB-MOLE/FEET YEAR), FROM AP-42, PG. 4.3-25 

DECK SEAM LENGTH FACTOR (FT/FT2), FROM AP-42, PG. 4.3-25 

TANK DIAMETER, FRMO NOI 

(PT/PA)/«1+(1-PT/PA)AO.5)A2) 

PT = TRUE VAPOR PRESSURE (1.3 PSIA), FROM FIGURE 4.3-6 

PA = AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE (12.4 PSlA), FROM NOZ 

.AVERAGE VAPOR MOLECULAR UEIGHT, FROM NOTE 1 OF EQUATION 

PRODUCT FACTOR, FROM NOTE 3 PG. 4.3-16 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOl 

FROM NOl 

(HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/UEEK)*(UEEKS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-790
 
,OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

S14 

FES-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: HYDRAULIC FLUID WASTE RECLAMATION UNITS 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING S14 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LSS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 1.D8 0.14 1.13 0.03 9S.00 21.63 22.S0 

ION FACTORS (IN LBS/GAL) COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ••••...•....•.•.•••••• 10.00 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

TOTAL WASTE FLUID PROCESSED IN YEAR .. 30000.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI. 

TOTAL IJASTE FLUID INCLUDED CONTAMINATION AND OTHER FLUIDS 

PERCENTAGE OF CONTAMINATION ........... 1S.00 % FROM NOI 

CONTAMINATION PROCESSED IN HOUR 2.16 GAL/HR (CONTAMINATION PROCESSED IN YEAR)/(ANNUAL OPERATING HOURS) 

CONTAMINATION PROCESSED IN YEAR 4S00.00 GAL/YR (TOTAL IJASTE FLUID PROCESSSED IN YEAR)* 

(PERCENTAGE OF CONTAMINANTS) 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAY 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI
 

~AYS PER WEEK 5 DAYS/WEEK FROM NOI
 

WEEKS PER YEAR 52 IJEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI
 

.•- ) PER YEAR 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/IJEEK)*(IJEEKS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-791 
.OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EHISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 514 

DATE: 

TIME: 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: VOC PPM CALC. FOR HYDRALIC FLUID 

COMPANY NAME:' DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 514 

WASTE RECLAMATION UNITS 

POLLUTANT VOC 

LB/HR ...........•... _.•. _ 

LBS/LB MOLE _..•. _ 

CONSTANT _. _ 

. 

. 

. 

1.08 

139.00 

60.00 

FROM CALCS ABOVE 

LBS/LB MOLE 

MIN/HR 

FLOIJ RATE ..........•.•..........•.•.. 

CONSTANT .......•..••••............... 

20000.00 

0.00259 

DSCF/MIN 

LB MOL/DSCF 

LB/MIN = (LB/HR)/(60 MIN.HR) 

0.02 

PPM (LB/MIN)/«DSCF/HIN)(LB HOLE/DSCF)(LB/LB MOLE)(1/lX10~6))

2.50 PPMV 

4.2.4-792
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

5N 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL PAINT SPRAY BOOTH EMISSION 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 5N 

ESTIMATE 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.18 0.02 0.18 0.01 85.00 0.18 0.18 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

URETHANE 

MI SCELLANEOUS 

4.2.4-793
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 5N 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: URETHANE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB . BUILDING 5N 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 0.16 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.17 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

~L OF VOC = VOC, vol % FROM PG. 4.2.2.1-3
 

COMMENTS
 

VOC non METHANE •••••.••.••• 6.80 LBS/GAL V(%)*(COATING DENSITY)/100 

V(%) •...•••••••.•••••• 80.00 % FROM NOI
 

COATING DENSITy .•.•••• 8.50 LBS/GAL FROM NOI
 

GALlHR 0.02 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/UEEK)/(UEEKS/YR) 

GAL/YR 50.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAY ..•.....•.••.. 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI 

DAYS PER UEEK ...•.....••... 5 DAYS/UEEK FROM NOI 

UEEKS PER YEAR . 52 UEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR •............ 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/OAY)*(OAYS/UEEK)*(UEEKS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-794
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 5N 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: MISCELLANEOUS 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 5N 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

HOORLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 

LBS/GAL OF VOC = VOC CONTENTS OF COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE 6.00 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

VOC CONTENT •........... 6.00 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

GAL/HR 0.00 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOORS/DAY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(IJEEKS/YR) 

GAL/YR 5.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy .........•.... 8 HOURS/DAY FROM'NOI 

DAYS PER WEEK .....•...••... 5 DAYS/WEEK FROM NOI 

WEEKS PER YEAR ....•....••.. 52 IJEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR . 2080 HOORS/YEAR (HOORS/DAY)*(DAYS/IJEEK)*(IJEEKS/YEAR) 

4,2.4-795
 
OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

5N 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL LAB HOODS EMISSION ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 5N 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HCURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC t CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 0.29 0.04 0.31 0.01 85.00 1.97 2.04 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

XYLENE 

NAPTHA ALIPHATIC 

ISOPROPHYL ALCOHOL 

4.2.4-796
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: 

SOURCE: XYLENE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 5N 

HOURLY 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC 

VOC non METHANE O. " 0.01

LBS/GAL OF VOC = SOLVENT DENSITY, 

VOC non METHANE •.....•..... 7.34 lBS/GAL 

SOLVENT DENSiTy ..•..... 7.34 LBS/GAL 

,{ . 0.10 GAL/HR 

""L/YR 200.00 GAL/YR 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy ..•...••.•.•.. 8 HCXJRS/DAY 

DAYS PER WEEK •••••••••..... 5 DAYS/WEEK 

WEEKS PER YEAR ..•.....•.... 52 WEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS PER YEAR ........•••.. 2080 HOURS/YEAR 

FILE: 5N 

DATE: FEB'14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

ANNUAL 

TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC ~: CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

0." 0.00 85.00 0.71 0.73 

COMMENTS
 

SOLVENT DENSITY
 

FROM CHEMICAL ENGINEERING HANDBOOK
 

(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(WEEKS/YR)
 

FROM NOI
 

FROM NO!
 

FROM NO!
 

FROM NO!
 

(HCXJRS/DAY)*(DAYS/WEEK)*(WEEKS/YEAR)
 

4.2.4-797
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: 

SOURCE: NAPTHA ALIPHATIC 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 5N 

HOURLY 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC 

VOC non METHANE 0.05 0.01 

LBS/GAL OF VOC =SOLVENT DENSITY 

VOC non METHANE 6.40 LBS/GAL 

SOLVENT DENSITy .••••••• 6.40 LBS/GAL 

0.05 GAL/HR 

100.00 GAL/YR 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy .••••••••..••• 8 HOURS/DAY 

DAYS PER IJEEK ....••.•••.... 5 DAYS/IJEEK 

IJEEKS PER YEAR .••.......•.. 52 IJEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS PER YEAR .......•..•.• 2080 HOURS/YEAR 

FILE: 5N 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

ANNUAL 

TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

0.05 0.00 85.00 0.31 0.32 

COMMENTS 

SOLVENT DENSITY 

FROM AP-42 TABLE 4.3-2, JET NAPTHA 

(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/IJEEK)/(IJEEKS/YR) 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

(HOURS/DAY)-(DAYS/IJEEK)-(IJEEKS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-798
 
)LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: 

SOURCE: ISOPROPHYL ALCOHOL 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 5N 

HOURLY 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC 

VOC non METHANE 0.14 0.02 

LBS/GAL OF VOC = SOLVENT DENSITY 

VOC non METHANE .•..•.....•. 6.60 LBS/GAL 

SOLVENT DENSiTy •.....•. 6.60 LBS/GAL 

0.14 GAL/HR 

_/YR 300.00 GAL/YR 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PEK DAY ......•.•..... 8 HOURS/DAY 

DAYS PER ~EEK ......•..•.•.. 5 DAYS/IJEEK 

~EEKS PER YEAR •.•...••..... 52 IJEEKS/YEAR 

HOURS Pb< YEAr< . .::060 HOURS/YEAR 

FILE: 5N 

DATE: FEB·14·90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

ANNUAL 

TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

0.15 0.00 85.00 0.95 0.99 

COMMENTS 

SOLVENT DENSITY 

FROM CHEMICAL ENGINEERING HANDBOOK 

(GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

FROM NOI 

(HOURS/DAY)-(DAYS/IJEEK)-(IJEEKS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-799
 
-- ;OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

220 

FEB- 14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: NET EMISSION ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOORLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC 

VOC 

non 

non 

METHANE 

MATHANE 

(PRE-MOO) " 

(POST-MOO) • 

19.22 

16.91 

2.42 

2.13 

19.99 

17.59 

0.57 

0.51 

0.00 

0.00 

19.22 

16.91 

19.99 

17. ,9 

NET EMISSION -2.31 -0.29 -2.40 -0.07 0.00 -2.31 -2.40 

SauCE INCLUDED: 

TOTAL PRE-MooIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

TOTAL POST-MooIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

-

-


4.2.4-800
 
,(OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

220 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL PRE-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOURLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 19.22 2.42 19.99 0.57 0.00 19.22 19.99 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

POLYURETHANE 

EPOXY POLYAMIDE PRIMER 

NITROCELLULOSE LACQUER 

MISCELLANEOUS 

(1600 AND 375 GALLONS/YEAR) 

4.2.4-801
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 220 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: EPOXY POLYAMIDE PRIMER 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOORLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 4.46 0.56 4.64 0.13 0.00 4.46 4.64 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

LBS/GAL OF VOC =VOC CONTENTS OF COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ....••...... 5.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

V(%) ••••••••••••••••••	 % 

COATING DENSITy .•••••. 10.50 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

GAL/HR 0.77 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

GAL/YR 1600.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAY ....•..••..... 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NO!
 

DAYS PER ~EEK .......•...... 5 DAYS/~EEK FROM NO!
 

~EEKS PER YEAR ••..•••••.••• 52 ~EEKS/YEAR FROM NOI
 

HOURS PER YEAR ...••••••...• 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/~EEK)*(~EEKS/YEAR)
 

4.2.4-802
 
.OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR: FILE: 

DATE: 

TIME: 

220 

FEB-14-90 

9:00 AM 

SOURCE: TOTAL POST-MODIFICATION EMISSION ESTIMATE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB . BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED UNCONTROLLED 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR 

HOORLY 

GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR 

ANNUAL 

GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE 16.91 2.13 17.59 0.51 0.00 16.91 17.59 

SOUCE INCLUDED: 

POLYURETHANE 

EPOXY POLYAMIDE PRIMER (375 GALLONS/YEAR) 

~ATER REDUCIBLE PRIMER 

NITROCELLULOSE LACQUER 

MISCELLANEOUS 

4.2.4-803
 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 220 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: POLYURETHANE 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURL Y ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 10.39 1.31 10.81 0.31 0.00 10.39 10.81 

AP-42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

~L OF VOC = VOC CONTENTS OF COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE •••••••••••• 4.70 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

V(%) ••••••••••••••••••	 % 

COATING DENSiTy ••••••• 9.20 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

GAL/HR 2.21 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

GAL/YR 4600.00 GAL/YR FRO'1 NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy ....•..•.•.••. -s HOURS/DAY FRO'1 NOI 

DAYS PER ~EEK .••.•••••••••• 5 DAYS/~EEK FROM NOI 

IIEEKS PER YEAR .....•••••..• 52 ~EEKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR ••.....•.•... 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)~(DAYS/~EEK)~(UEEKS/YEAR)

.-..,.. 

4.2.4-804 
JLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 220 

DATE: FEB-i4-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: EPOXY POLYAMIDE PRIMER 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOORLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 1.05 0.13 1.09 0.03 0.00 1.05 , .09 

Ap·42 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VOLUME 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

_~/GAL OF VOC = VOC CONTENTS OF COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ••••.•••••.. 5.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

V(%) ••••••••••••••••••	 % 

COATING DENSiTY ......• 10.50 LBS/GAL F.<OM NO] 

GAL/HR 0.18 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/WEEK)/(WEEKS/YR) 

GAL/YR 375 .00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAy .......•...••. 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI 

DAYS PER WEEK .••••••••••.•• 5 DAYS/~EEK FROM NOI 

WEEKS PER YEAR •••••.••.•••. 52 ~EEKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR •••.•.....••. 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)~(DAYS/WEEK)~(WEEKS/YEAR)

4.2.4-805
 
10LLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSiON ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 220 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: YATER REDUCIBLE PRIMER 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 2.15 0.27 2.24 0.06 0.00 2.15 2.24 

AP-~2 FQC:':7r. E:;:7:0:; SE?T. 1ge5 V::;:"UHE 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.1-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

~g~/GAL OF VOC : VOC CONTENTS OF COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE •.•••••••••• 2.80 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

V(%) ••••••••••••••••••	 % 

COATING DENSITy ••••••• 8.90 LSS/G':'~

GAL/HR o.n GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/YEEK)/(YEEKS/YR)
 

GAL/YR 1600.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI
 

HOURS OF OPERATION
 

HOURS PER DAy . 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NO!
 

DAYS PER YEEK ...••..•....•• 5 DAYS/YEEK FROM NOI
 

YEEKS PER YEAR .•••••••••••. 52 YEEKS/YEAR FROM NOI
 

HOURS PER YEAR . 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/YEEK)*(YEEKS/YEAR)
 

4.2.4-806
 
.~

ILLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 220 

DATE: FEB- 14·90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: NITROCELLULOSE LACQUER 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB . BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOURLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 1.44 0.18 1.50 0.04 0.00 1.44 1.50 

Ap·'2 FOURT~ EDITIO~ SEDT. 'o~5 VOLUM! 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOURCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.'-' voe EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

,GAL OF VOC VOC CONTENTS OF COATING
 

COMMENTS
 

VOC non METHANE .•..•••.••.• 4.80 LBS/GAL FRctI NOI 

VC%) ••..••••••.•••.•.. %
 

:OhiI~~ D~~~ITY .•.•••• O.CO LBS/(j,,~ ;:ROM NOI
 

GAL/HR 0.30 GAl/HR CGAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/CDAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

GAl/YR 625.00 GAl/YR fROI'I NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION
 

HOURS PER DAy .•.•.•.•...... 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NO!
 

DAYS PER IJEEK ••.•••..•••..• 5 DAYS/IJEEK FROI'I NOI
 

~EEKS PER YEAR •••.•••.•..•• 52 IJEEKS/YEAR FRctI NOI
 

HOURS PER YEAR ..•....•••..• 2080 HOURS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)-CDAYS/IJEEK)-CIJEEKS/YEAR)
 

4.2.4-807
 
:OLLED AND UNCONTROLLED EMISSION ESTIMATES FOR:	 FILE: 220 

DATE: FEB-14-90 

TIME: 9:00 AM 

SOURCE: MISCELLANEOUS 

COMPANY NAME: DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE 

LOCATION: HILL AFB - BUILDING 220 

CONTROLLED	 UNCONTROLLED 

HOORLY ANNUAL 

POLLUTANT LBS/HR GRAMS/SEC TONS/YR GRAMS/SEC % CNTRL LBS/HR TONS/YR 

VOC non METHANE	 1.88 0.24 1.95 G.06 0.00 1.88 1.95 

AP-l.2 FOURTH EDITION SEPT. 1985 VO:"U~~:: 1 

SECTION 4 EVAPORATION LOSS SOORCES 

4.2 SURFACE COATING 

TABLE 4.2.2.'-1 VOC EMISSIONS FOR UNCONTROLLED SURFACE COATING 

PAINT TYPE: CONVENTIONAL 

~u~/GAL OF VOC = VOC CONTENTS OF COATING 

COMMENTS 

VOC non METHANE ..•..•.••... 6.00 LBS/GAL FROM NOI 

V( %) ••••••••••••••••••	 % 

CGAT[~G DENSITy ..••... 9.00 LilS/GAL ,ROM tWI 

GAL/HR 0.31 GAL/HR (GAL/YR)/(HOURS/DAY)/(DAYS/~EEK)/(~EEKS/YR)

GAL/YR 650.00 GAL/YR FROM NOI 

HOURS OF OPERATION 

HOURS PER DAY .•••.•....•.•. 8 HOURS/DAY FROM NOI 

DAYS PER ~EEK ...•.•......•. 5 DAYS/~EEK FROM NOI 

~EEKS PER YEAR .••••••..•••• 52 ~EKS/YEAR FROM NOI 

HOURS PER YEAR .••.•.••••••• 2080 HOORS/YEAR (HOURS/DAY)*(DAYS/~EEK)*(~EEKS/YEAR)

4.2.4-808
 
P.ECEiV~D

: -, ~~/..J

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY J lJ)~ 20 1990

.-	 REGION VIII 

999 18th STREET - SUITE 500 

DENVER, COLORADO 80202-2405 

Ref:	 8AT-AP 

Mr. David Kopta 

Engineering Unit Manager 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Utah Department of Health 

P.O. Box 16690 

Salt Lake City, Utah 84116-0690 

Dear	 Dave: 

Upon review of the May 22, 1990, Notice of Intent to approve 

five projects at Hill Air Force Base (Installation of Steam 

Boilers, Vapor Seals for JP-4 STorage Tanks, Waste Hydraulic 

Fluid Reclamation Units, a Paint Spray Booth, Lab Hoods, and a 

Paint Spray Hanger), EPA has the following comments: 

1.	 The proposed approval order Condition 4.G, for the paint 

spray hanger at building 220, should include the usage of 

375 gallons/year of epoxy polyamide primer. 

2.	 Although the proposed approval order Condition 5, for the 

hydraulic fluid waste reclamation unit, states that the 

condenser must be 95% effective, there is no requirement to 

demonstrate this efficiency, such as through performance 

testing. The efficiency of the condenser may be determined 

by monitoring solvent input to the condenser, and solvent 

recovery. Condition 5 only requires monitoring the amount 

of hydraulic fluid processed, and the amount of solvent 

recovered from the condenser. In addition to these 

parameters, HAFB should be required to pericdically ffieaSUre 

and record the solvent content of the hydraulic fluid being 

processed. The State should add this requirement to 

Condition 5, and also require the calculation of solvent 

emissions to the air, on a 12-month rolling monthly basis. 

3.	 The requirements for solvent degreasing, in Condition 11, 

should be updated to reflect the revised UACR 4.9.4.A. 

Please contact Mindy Mohr at (303) 294-7539 with any 

questions regarding our comments. 

Sincerely, 

u ~- - -B-~ /. /-c 

Marius J. Gedgaudas, Chief 

Compliance Section 

4.2.4-809 
IU 

o 

UNTEO STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 ft R'EGION VIII
 

999 18th STREET - SUITe 500
 

DENVER, COLORADO 80202-2405
 

JUN 22 !tJ~)
 

Ref:	 SAT-AP 

Mr. Oavid Kopt.!.
 

Enqineering Unit Manager
 

Bureau of Air Quality
 

Utah Department of Health
 

~.O.	 ~ox i~~90

Salt	 Lake City, Utah 84116-0690 

Dear	 Dave: 

Upon review of the May 22, 1990, Notice of Intent to approve
 

five projects at Hill Air Force Base (Installation of Steam
 

Boilers, V.!.por Seals for JP-~ STora98 Tanks, Waste Hydraulic
 

FlUid Reclamation Units, a Paint Spray Booth, Lab Hoods, ana a
 

Paint Spray HanCjer), EPA has the follo'Wing comments:
 

1 •	 The proposed approval order Condition 4.G, for the paint ­ spr~f han~er at bUildin~ 22Q r 9hQ~~d .nQ~~gi thl ~5aij6 of 

375 ~allon6/year of epoxy polyamide primer. 

2.	 "Although the proposed approv.!.l ord.r Condition 5, for the
 

hydraulic tluld w~6te reclamation unit, stat., that the
 ~ond8n~.r mu.~ b. 95' effective, there is no requirement to
 

demonstrate this etf1ciency, such as through performance
 

testing. ~he efficiency of ~he condenser may be determined
 

by monitoring solvent inpu~ to the condenser, and solvent
 

recovery. Condition 5 only requires monitoring the amount
 

of hyd=a~lic fluid processed, and the amount ot solvent
 

recovered from the condenser. In addition to these
 

parameters, HA~E Ihould be required to periodically measure
 

and record the solvent content of the hydraulic fluid beinq
 processed~ The State should add this requirement to
 

Condition =, and also r.qui:. the caloulation of solvent
 

emi6sioil5 to the ai~, on a 12-month =ollin9 monthly babib.
 

~.	 The ~,qu~rem.nts for solvent ca9reabing, in Conditior. 1i,
 

should be updated to reflect the revised UACR 4.~.~.A.
 

Please co~~a=t Mindy Mohr a~ (303) 294-7539 w~th any
 

questions regarding our =ornments.
 

Sincerely, 

T£)-uY!.-­

£riu6 J. Gedgauda~:I ~f 4.2.4-810 Compliance Section 
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
 

HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER IAFLCi
 

HILL AIR FORC E BASE. UTAH 84056-5990
 

AIR Q[JAi lTV 

Mr F. Burnell Cordner, Executive Secretary 22 NOV 1989 

Utah Air Conservation Committee 

Bureau of Air Quality 

288 North 1460 West 

P.O. Box 16690 

Salt Lake City, UT 84116-0690 

RE: Notice of Intent to Construct, Paint Spray Hangar Modification, Bldg 220 

Dear Mr. Cordner 

In compliance with Section 3.1 of the State Air Conservation Regulations, we 

submit the attached Notice of Intent to Construct. 

If this office can provide additional information, please feel free to contact 

Jay Gupta at 777-7651. 

Sincerely 

1 Atch
 

JAM~S R. VAN ORMAN Notice of Intent to Construct
 

Director
 

Envr'iltl MDt Dir
 

4.2.4-811
 
Notice of Intent to Construct
 

Modification of Aircraft Paint Hangar, Bldg 220
 

Hill Air Force Base, Utah
 

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 

We propose to modify our existing aircraft paint hangar in building 220. 

The existing paint hangar is a grand-fathered source that was built in the 

50's and therefore, we currently do not have an air quality permit for this 

source. Please refer to your Approval Order dated Dec 28, 1987 for corrosion 

control bUilding 220, where three new paint booths were permitted. Those 

paint booths were as a result of conversion of aircraft chemical stripping 

areas into paint booths. Existing paint hangar waterfall troughs and piping 

is corroded out. These troughs and piping will be replaced by Devilbiss 

~.~~dular tUI'boclean chambers cc~.,;.lct.t: ::: ttl pumps, nozzles, associated piping, 

controls and sludge disposal. A manufacturer's bulletin on these turboclean 

chamber units is attached (Atch 1). There will be a total of 9 units 

including 2 exhaust fans per unit. Based on a volumetric flow rate of 18,500 

cubic feet per minute (CFM) per tan, total exhaust volume will be 

approximately 333,000 CFM. The points of discharge will be approximately 52 

feet above ground. A face velocity of at least 100 feet per minute (FPM) 

shal~ be maintained across the crossectional area of each unit. The paint 

hangar can accomodate up to three aircrafts for painting at one time and 

hangar can be spl1 t into three painting areas using movable parti ~~c. •• ",. 

2. AIR EMISSIONS: 

Air emissions from painting operations include hydrocarbons and 

particulates. 80-90% of painting in the hangar involves painting exterior of 

aircraft and related components. Only a limited number of miscellaneous items 

will be painted. According to Utah. Air Conservation Regulation 4.9.6.g. (1) (g) 

painting exterior of airplanes is ·exempt· from VOC regulation under 

miscellaneous metal parts and p~oducts VCC emissions. Also, as stated above, 

these emissions have existed over the years since these sources were 

grand-fathered. We are not adding any new emissions as a result ot this 

modification. In fact, the overall emissions will be reduced due to (a) 

substitution of solvent base primer with water reducible primer and (b) using 

high volume low pressure (HVLP) paint guns to increase the transfer 

efficiency of paint guns. Particulate emissions are controlled using 

waterfalls, reduction in hydrocarbon emissions is estimated as follows: 

Approximate Paint Usage: 

Polyurethane 4600 gals/yeaI'
 

Epoxy Polyamide Primer 375 gals/year
 

Water Reducible Primer 1600 gals/year
 

Nitrocellulose Lacquer 625 gals/yeaI'
 

Mis~~llaneous 650 gals/y~ar
 

Average voe content of paints 

VOC (lbs/gall Density (lbs/gals) 

Polyurethane 4.7 9,2 

Epc~j Polyamide Primer 5.8 10.5 4.2.4-812 
Wate~ Reducible P~ime~ 2.8 8.9
 

Nit~ocellulose Lacque~ 4.8 8.0
 

Miscellaneous 6.0 9.0
 

Hydroca~bon emission befo~e modification: 

4600x4.7 + 1600x5.8 + 375x5.8 + 625x4.8 + 650x6/2000 = 20 tons/yea~

Hydroca~bon emissions afte~ modification: 

4600x4.7 + l600x2.8 + 375x5.8 + 625x4.8 + 650x6/2000 = 17.6 tonB/yea~

Hyd~oca~bon ~eduction due to this modification: 

20-17.6 = 2.4 tons/yea~

Reduction in hyd~oca~bon emissions due to inc~ease in t~ansfe~ efficiency is 

not shown above. It is estimated that the t~ansfe~ efficiency of HVLP system 

could be 60-701 as compared with 30-40~ fo~ the conventional type sp~ay gun. 

This increase in t~ansfer efficiency will ~educe ove~all paint consumption 

the~eby ~educing emissions to the atmosphe~e. A manu!acture~'s bulletin on 

HVLP system is attached (Atch 2). Manufactu~e~ claims t~ansfe~ efficiency as 

high as 90t on certain wo~kpieces.

3. AIR CLEANING DEVICES: 

Paint pa~ticulate emissions will be cont~olled by waterfalls. Hyd~oca~bon

emissions a~e cont~olled by substituting solvent base p~ime~ by water 

~educible p~imer and by using HVLP system spray gun. No othe~ cont~ol devices 

a~e p~oposed due to high cost of cont~olling diluted hydroca~bon ai~ st~eam

f~om the paint hanga~. This is illustrated by the cost analysis fo~ ca~bon

adso~ption units as follows: 

Total volume of gas flow to be treated = 330,000 CFM. According to EPA 

a~ticle ·Recove~y of Volatile Organics fo~ Industrial Sou~ces· by James 

T. Spivey, Typical capital costs fo~ conventional steam-gene~ated systems 

are '15-20/CFM. Fo~ large volumes, use 'lO/CFM. Capital cost of ca~bon

adsorption units = '3,300,000. Annualized cost assuming 20 yea~s life at 

8X ~ate:

:: '3,300,000 x Capitol Recovery Factor
 

= '3,300,000 x 0.1019
 

=. 336,270
 

Annual ope~ating costs including labor, utilities, and ca~bon
 

~egene~ation:
 

Assume at 151 = • 495,000 

Assuming 90% efficiency, pollutant reduction :: 17.6x.9 = 15.84 tons/year 

Cost '/ton pollutant = $ 831,270 

15.84 

= 52,480 '£/ton pollutant 

4. EMISSION POINTS: 

There will be eighteen exhaust stacks discha~ging app~oximately 330,000 

CFM into the atmosphe~e. Point of discharge will be about 52 feet above 

g~ade.

4.2.4-813 
5.	 SAMPLE POINTS: 

No sampling points are provided. 

6.	 OPERATING SCHEDULE: 

This facility will normally be operated three 8-hour shifts a day, 5 days 

a week, 52 weeks a year. 

-


4.2.4-814
 
! DEVILBISS 
 

.-._--_._----_.--------_.._--_.­

'!~~.', : l~-~ I·';.:..... f~ 1;'?'i):~~1if·~~J

, .."" 

--=-~._.~:",- : 

:i~ '';-. 

i \. " --------:_--/'-- '. 

.c.:.~~;~

- ..... i --'-""'7 . ~

!~ :, ... ~/('~~~-)J'.~.fCr:.'t " ~--- ': •. , "i':t:n"~'1:~~ :i	 .-:-",," : /: ~"~C'1~·~~

.­ .~::	 . ~:~J ~'~;~r~~{t~

.".~.-,,:~--'-'---""""""",'~-~._ ' ·.::~:K~··-·21.&~r~

r"7-"--- . :.-~."

f: .' '.: 

b·· 

L~';, -~ . .:. . >.' L"·.-<··' 

," "-----" 1.1
 

!
 

,;
 

1
 

f. : 

E~eva(~C: ,,:::} Lo~..r Type TURBOCLEAN
 

Cham!;ers
 

Both typS3 c~e 2v2.i'2.:::; in 24".36" and 48" a:r v:2.silers.
 

The ch2.~::: :.;~s proVlO:; t:-:e fo:lowing su~f:cient w2s::iilg
 

capacit~·:
 

24" ch~~~~,:2;-L'pto 1000 dm per foot of v"idth 23 GPkL
 

36" ch::~-,::er-":U;Jto; 400 cf;n per foot 0; v.~dth 22 GPM.
 

48" d'i.:,':;:':·8r-Uptc 2eaO cf:n perfeot ofwidU~ 55 GPM.
 

Elevafc::f Type 

_I: Elev2.~sj chcT.j·::;rs cie [Jre!erred wheneve~ ~"..<::::er1t
 

ceilin~ ::s:g~t is a'.'2.::~b:e (minimum of 14 t).
 

E It is d:~' :::-,cc: :;:.1" c.~;'-'·::<:it;ons where overs;x(.~·: ,:_:;ec~: .. 

horiz::. -,:':: ';' 2~.\:.o: 2: :,'si or hig:<er o.:-,d alioN::'.;" c. :~ec(;"',

pick.::; -::: '.:'e c;.:ces:::·.',::;~o;ay and c:im:nc.ti;-", 0: ~he

rebour": j f::,;n Co fi2.~ ::c:dsheet. 

Ill; Air is v:::.s,.."ss t·... :.:s -uc:ssing through a f1ooc':' :cct of 

water 2.~C \:.C:~ s::~c.: :::sj and t!gitated in a d~: ': '0, cve~·

lappin(; s;::~c.l p2.tteir, fj8iT1 the nozzlss. 

• Three c.:r velocities: 100. 125 and 150 fpm. 

. _ Entire volume of water on wash down sheet. 

II Very tow resista:lC8 to a;i flow. 

I: Conven:s;ot inspe-::ticn 2.nd clean-out doors. 

LowTJ-pe 

II LoWlype chambers are employed where building ceiling 

heigh:s restrict the use of elevated type-minimum of 

10 fl. E in. ceiling height required. 

II: Airiswashed lwice-passing through the curtain 0; water 

from wash down sheet-scrubbed and agitated in dense, 

overlapping spray from nozzles. 

IlThreeairvelocities-~C8. 125and 150fpm. 

Q	 Wa!~flo'..: 0:1 'Nash dm';n sheet traps paint. ke:s::s
 

sul1ace clean and provides first stage washing.
 

E Convenient inspe:::tion and clean,out doors. 

Low Chamber 

ATCH-J. 

4.2.4-815 

u:r;:.i. ! 

7 
._- r -,~ .- r., ,.... , . , ..r: r 01; c'; __ ,;-",. ...... _ • ;.-' . ~...

f_ '~'l't' .. .. ·o'\,.' 

... Co --rC\,.. _~. » II'- U_oI.I -~rC""--_ .. -~. -. .~......' ,..',.... .... J,.~.. .:... •• ""-_ .... ,.J ...... 

--_.._--- ----------- ,------------­ ·i·lJ'~£'<.~.~::...::,::... i~ ~:;~.::::.' CJ;:;ori!
 7 1.... :"'),/ 'r. ! ....... r~r:~,\'.: ~-~ b r'\...... ;..... , ~_.~.r- .. (---.
 '"l; ,',' .,,'/v,.•./ .. , -"p,;;y O..,."ISaUil,,,:.JC,,.)-,","'''''_ 

\'::, ',,:;; ·:.;:;;~1 S;J["~. tJO:'~ t(;;;,":o10:0gy aVCJlla~ie cr"::,, ~:-:::

C\:~\'::~.:..-.;".

f: 

i"i::::.\£ 

v;·J; .~,~

#~

~'J

;[)/::':f.J,:,.~:!.-£Af

cc;-,;:;r:~~~:!: biea'p,L:p 

..rSr·

p3int 

..";;y BDotl) 

C:CCU:Tlu~a.:i.:·=-.

L':' 0::,,-­~.-:-: ~.'

s·._;~a-:~·:j' t~:e t~~;::~5 in~c iii;nL.:~e, €2.sicr to harldiB :;~: ".: ;: 

:.;~s ( . :~ ':;;l~. ,L,S ;'"~St.::~ C! Ih:s rGdi.Jc~:cn. l~e fl::CC ~: . 

:::.:~-::;",.' _. ,:"ic '.'/;:2:C· d-3::rc::;s8S as we:l.:.s ma1il:;:;:~:"

2.r.C: ll~'~ ··:::2Ci ;{., .. ;d~C:.C:':'"':',~:·.:te~s.

. ...:- t:;o C0ne, i:-,~c. :: -:;::ie . 

scpan:.',c··:-' ..... ... \\1 a: S~ . ~:o rec:~(::.J~~ ~E.: ::':';d 

pas£ec !:...-:::::. . 2 Su;f2~'':- ..:: :( ::O:i"lmc ;,lC CC;" 2S fro:n 

.:.. -:; :; ,,:.; '.',.:. -, r~·:;.~ ;Jar;,:c:es ;:~.:.. s ~.'- :..... ::~ ;": :~: :~3;:'i,;.~:

.. '" •.:~o\'.'n :-epca:( ~: y uril:' ,I_l'~. :~_ .;:.20CL:.~\,~'.: a:::,ol; :-C:-:7~~VC'S th3liquid trc..-.. .::-: :;':~:. These SOilC::;, :; ;";;2.:1)' r~,·~.;;-;t~: :-\",;j :cc ...~:.: it:c ~;-.\; s:'·~':';';i(;s: sc::: pa.n:::,:::::.. ..: ~.: ... :>J;-;"j \\'hCiC l~l~'/ ".;~,"Ti. .3 ti,:::; CC~:.::':;. i: :i'-c.:'CS 2. V:2sis "c.1rpet" 0:1th8 bc~:­

,c:.;;;-; r0,);ese:,~;,;; ;:'i~'I 'A tn 10 Ito th of the origi;,2~,~'~

of L'lG paint spizyed intc the bo~th. i;,e T:JF=i5C ::;i..EAN "c:~:~':::' is :nade up e:-,tir€:l:, of ~he

Ob-ncxious Cdc;~ solid non-VC:':I!e part 0: 1;:8 p2.int. It is a r,oi1flammable, t.roL:r.c Sooth-lmprov),,::: nC:1·sjj::~y ',', ,:s!e-z Q'C:': e;o' ·::.:::-:;nental improve;nent ir Vl(;,~j::g Ccnclti:.·~s.

ti1e bOG:~ 2-,,-:':2. as cor:: :::.:~C: ':';::~ ,,'1e sticky, hazardous, TrH3 cc-::;r;;.;ous ?c:,cUon:r. t!~e TURBOCLEAN b: diIE:;;.!:! ~.: ::!san p3.,;-,t \·,:'I~;; &';:::;u;nu!ates i., most water tair.s ahigh lave: ct disso;ved 0xygen In the wate:. i:~:s tar,ks. Tr.2 3.CUC;I of the TUR50CLEAN cone mi;.;es air in eliminC::!l3s stagr.:::"icn and p:events the gro......1h cf cjc:­ water, t':us mz:ntc:ninQ 2. high level of oxygen. This flow 0: s.at.:~ng anz,cro:: ,c :;ac:eria. oxyger.:3,~:::j ',va:(;, aro~;l:'~ the; ta:-,k z:.t alileve!s reduces Fu~p ~!1d No;.:::~e. C!oQ~::-,g. . "'- s:<lgroGb:,; E;.;-,d ,,8:pS piS','C:!, ,lie growth of ana''::'cbic 

7:-l(; ,C:''::t::l~cj \/;';."1:1.1;1 cone ::~ :ocated adjacci,: to:: " ' b:::'ClCri.::: :~:s :i~;s ~&C:C:- :::::: c:z,L,;sc:s the tyr;.;ca :oui cdc, 

:;;;<:;,..:::; -:,.d fXO'lijcs prote:::;.Jn forme pumps en':; :::.:.. , __ [;.$s.:;~z.:.::i ~'.. ;::~ c:c ::~. ,C .. :~~.~.: .. ,·,',J.stl bocths, 2.g2:.i,'~: ;:,:ogg:~,g. This gicaLiy reduces booth do\\';-,:,::';' -­ NG: :.::-,: 5 C2.;/ ~c ;T";2"':2 :.:. ;sink, Sorrlc of ~bei"'rl ;1C:Z,i. on a:)c fTi:::.~e bocl.-, "uptime" r:>eans more produCli\';~:'::: -., v\'at~r .. -;:; ;~:J~2.t8 ai1~ h2.i:-::;C= these ~2iLjcles. a c: n~roUea

Co~~c~nd USZ4ge .. 1;C:Z.~:~"· J:--;~; ;s p;CV:C0:.-; ::~ the !3.:lk, trapping 0 .y par· 

l:s uj'::c;ue \',3:er was:ling act:c:l causes a mo;~ COl':" ~~'. , ::c,:;s :~- •. '::on'1 S;j~ Elf..•C::·':·li:::::~ ~heir re:nov, \',:-18n 

;;r~2!'::;,::;"/" 0; p3in: pc:.rtici8S. 5y d€Cre2sjn~the i,:;:~ ::.:', :l22(;;S":.: .~:. T;-::Js, ~he T~/,-·:~?:",CL5;'./\' booth g;'"e.:~;y

chi:.i~L::::S: cS:T.pound brea:~::own, tot2: becth opc;z;:;C l~-~;:;C'..'~:'~ t~~ :re3.ti7~e:l~ c'- Q:: :':1~·es of paints inci .,c.:i;lg 

c.,:':£:S 2~G :e~uced. pri;'l:::~s '.::.:) ,':C2.~$. en2.;Y.(';:S. ·~;::JAY3. ureUI2.nC~

:: \:..:~~ 2·~ ;3(;::; t~2 l.seC for f;"(.. c~er:t ski:THTI::IQ. Reg'_.~·

'--::':::::;..:;:i -:;: ~:~.8 ::ce-:r: can C:'; c;\'12.,dcc ::~ v/ceks 0:- r.. 

rr:.:;:~;"';~: ..~dd to el:S red\J:::c.:d ',·;·2.s~e disposal a;-:d y~..'~:':'

;~::)"..: c iiJ,ciBOCLE;',N sp:a'! bQottl can pay (or ilsc:r ;;; " 

·.. "~~ry.' ;~.~Q"" ti:"i:e.·~

4.2.4-816
 
DeVILBISS H\-LP Svstell1 89'\; '­

.,,_. Complete systems for 

industrial High. Volume. 

Low Pressure applications. 

, ••_ &' • - .' ...... 0.. ...: . _0. ..... _ ... '..... . ". '. _ _ .. 

.. ­

. ­

.r--. 

.- , 

....~. "~:"

.. ' .~." . . . ! 

". \:." :_) 

' ..-' 

, ; / 

...... 

:--' 

; ,

, ; 

.......
 ,I ~!,. J 

-e. ..... j 

... .' - • ,'4 

.. '"'I -~ ...

! ~~:-"'------'--_ ... 

• i.... .. , .... .. .."': -~-, ':;'''~' ...~', .~-: ... -. ~.~ .. 

-\ir conversion units. turbine air" 

generators, handguns and more. ( 

... 

4.2.4-817 

A,CH-Z­
\Vhat"s the best 

HVLP systen1 for you: 

Here are son1e 

2uidelines for C1100sing

an HLVP svsteIll. 

High·production. continuous-duty. 

For hlgtholume InCiustnai use. ~ou neec 

lile 5\Slem lhat"s procluclI\e hour after 

Ilour ancl lia\· after aa~. lOU need a .......;
 l)e\ i1l1iss \\ali·moumea ~,Ii Com erSion 

Lnll Wilh pressure lan~ or piston DumD 

iluld supply. 

These s\srems can handle one or [\\0 

~uns per air SilJiCe con[Jr.uousl~

prO\lding up to 10 pSI. Tiley can he 

xaered \\llh heJ\ \'CiUl~ air neaters (-\ic _.~

'-~ Comerslon LnilS \\"lhoUl Ileal can be .-., mounted inside lhe spray ooorh.) -\: ".. .J maXlmur.l pressul'e. they nandle hlgner '-~

;- .~ solids levelS than oltler j-j\LP systems. 

-\na no turbine Urill IS requlrecl. 

\Iedium·low production. portability.
 

~,u: Turbine Lnlls need no compressed all'
 .""1 supply. They neea no air healer because
 

lhe wrbme healS [he air. They simply
 

..	 plug Into slJnaard 110 \olt power 

supplies. \Vhen used With cup·fed guns 

or wllh a l\\o-gallon oressure lank. the:: 

go anywhere: :ust plug them Ir. ann 

you·re ready [r) go 

When properiy JnSlallecl. used. and 

maimalned. JII Del, liblSS H\'LP systems 

are dt'S!gnea to meel or P..\ceecl inSUrJnct' 

maUSl,': safel~ standards. 

:" 

:.:: :~sU:J(C'(J '.. ,eli; \ ; 

I "1- /J ,l:'>l,. "'e ~'. 0"" ,iJ ,.".,,,- f\,\. .... , .. 'nII e 

I rI!)t'r,llor S :13!1n u,mron.JDle 

i II hen sprallnJ:! II·Hn hlJ:!h I •. ­

.-1 [en~De~ature air 

4.2.4-818
 
" :~~;~ .. lre:) (or~e(!

:ill l'llnSlrUClIlJJ1 to 

1\ \ IJ1Dustrial use, '.:',\CCiil"::l JtOlrllZJliUil 

,~ ';It't'l !lUlL! liP <lll(] ~Jltern IS iilll!lllt':\ 

ill ~eC1 neecllr t'.\ler.d (lCi!UstJOle f~()rn (u:: ~z;r:

to rouna 

JGHV: 

_-\ DeVilbiss S[)l'ClY 

£uo ciesi£ned 

spedfically for 

HVLP atoolizatiotl. 

.:,~ io\\ rxessure:~ s :'2r mori:' C1ifficullLO 

bi'eaK-~I; Da!-j~: ~t0 smail panicles. \lost 

::3;)I'a\ guns \\QUid Cl0 2 marginai 100 Tile 

JG H\ :5 ~r:e ::,\ce~lIon.

De\ilo:ss :s ~o: sl:npi\ a hard\\are 

::3uooiier' ',\("'-:' :,:::nous fo~ 2tOmlZ2tJon. 

\\e Kno\\ no\\ ,0 c:es!gn all ,~aos, and \\e 

KnO\\ ho\\ to c::JI;i~ DJir,t 

':'t ] ~,_ :0 ::S:, the JCi1\ pro\ldes 

,:onslsten: :::i:WE 8rea,..:-U0 !: generales a 

:SO:l ~\~~"I ;~'C:~~::~~ ~hC1t produces a 

"niforr:: :)JII(1 ~!~e JCf-1\' has proouced 

iirgh c~a'::\ :'il'SI':::'S \\IC~ SOlids le\'e!s as 

::!~!1 cb =5 ~"~ :~~~ s :'ci:' r;!~~e:-- ~n3n ~OSl

i\\ pressure ::3\ S:::;[1S can nanale, 

-\nd ye:. ::k' JC~\ ccesnt compromise 

()OerJwr~-o:T:(~)r'~ :lS forqed aiUffimcm 

JO(JY anu I,au;:; ,:,ns;meerec: plastic gnp 

r,,2Ke I: (,I:';[Or,J:;;:: JnG lighL \\lth good 

balance,:~c' the r;:(iustry,standard jG.-\, 

Because you CJ" cnoose from a \\ide 

\anelY of tlDS 2,10 rlUld caps, you can be 

sure there S <Jne tnats laeal for you. 

~CH\ 112n(lirS s,)i\er+i"i)ased and 

\\JterjcJ:':l::' sa~e:')3:S !: CJIl De ordered 

\\Ith a ]'2011Ior: Glessure lam: or \\'Itn a 

Te!lon-J,!n~~; C:"::~'.

Top ngnr On!! g:,.'J i;anciles SOI\enl or 

:ioleriJOI'nr: ,'!)o,f'rtals Ii can Ix: used \i '/[i7 

:::[hl:'r preSSLJff: :~~ 0:" SU[{Jon (eed \i'leh 

\/iejo!e r'~n -i;,: ~.r;;r:proauceshigi7 

qualJ{'. :";,:"'::'::;nt>:: ::, :':,'7 e.I:)" //:,!~ 2S :: pSI. ,,[ 

i(J ,'JSi' ~anr;-,s '::EOlUr:;-;;1£rJ solids 

!30[[On:';;l:;! ~)c[2,'!!e(! :ir::,\iiJ/e balli.'"1Y::' Sii;\;o1 :'0:;:7:-:'[::;" :XU\ !C'es comoleee 

i)7ane:/i ef2:)I'::', "," 9.,::,!!:::g !nco ugiJ[ 

:'i:-fas 

The JGH\ can use a Del ;IC:IS~ 4.2.4-819 Tef1on'iJnea cu D ur u 

oressure lJnK as SI1O'.\ n f,t,e 
\Vith more air source
 

options than any other .­

sUQplier. D.eVIlbiss }1as 

an ans\ver for every 

HVLP need. 

\Jor.e than any QLner pa:LOf-your H~LP

system. the air source will limIt your 

options and determine ho\\' you can use 

the equipment.. De'/ilblss offers t\\D basic 

systems and lots of options. 

The first configuration IS the .-\ir 

Comerslon L'nit. This \rall·mounted unit 

accepts high pressure air from any 

normal compressed air source and 

proauces low pressure air for HHP 

application. 

It's designed for contlnuous·duty 

industrial applications where the utmost 

comroi IS neeaed. Pressure!s adjustabie 

from 2 to 10 pSI. To improve Oash and 

taCK time. It can be supplied WIth either afixed· or adiustable-temperature heavyauty air heater that offers fast warm-up 

and consistent air temperature. !t can be 

used with one or t\\·o guns 

The most portable' unit 1I1lhe DeJilbisS 

line is the .Air Turbine l'nit (.ATLJ This 

system uses a heavy-duty three-stage 

turbine-alr generator whlcn requIres no 

compressed air source. only a 110 volt 

-\C po\ver supply Turbine units are 

placed outSide me spray booth. spray 

room or designated hazaraous iocatlons. 

Top ierr The moael ~Ci..··500 offers 

aa/usrable OUUJU[ ,'Jressure. 

Top right '1'1 o4CL moaeis Inciude 

l7earers. rt7e~G550 fsnOlln; and [he 

4C['·560 l>t[n adius£2Die near 

Rigl1L The po([aole J.n models are 

complere/v self-':omamed. Plug [hem !nCO 

a standard 170 lAC paller source and 

you fe read.l· {O oam; 

/ 

4.2.4-820
 
Hi£ll \olurne Lo\\
 

Pressure: Higll
 '.~~(){ ,.\ ;J~:~Lt"r:' transfer efficiency.
 

ane! a lot 1110!'C.
 I ·J~·SP:·2\.

~l() ().'11 r.1!i (-:r:21:: \1. ():'~o!e(l;"'~

SliCtl h!2!' [,'ur>'f" ,:,rfCI::.':W·~::l;·U\i'S

:lc:ll1lln~ !)c',',I}["'iiCir:ct> J:) leSS ina~t'riJI i;:; 

!m 

---.--..,;~

-~,:'J ........)
 

..... 

'_ ....­<1
 

'-"~~iL~,

"!!H \::''';'.\L.:Y' 'I l;l·.\ ,)O~r2.Ul)n

"':i~'. ~C:: :i--: ·)['cerec \\;[h 

',\ irnoL;t 21r :,~~lers

\\cb[c'U Tilt' 8(1)lh :ic'ecls It:)S 

s\ ~~ems ?~.~ DIO\ IUeG \\ '~h

:,:~n~r J;:;\)['Hineu rn.:uer:2' 

::~I~~~ -.;; ;1,: ~;>~.)c:z:;;'. ~~:~!.2!r.et~·CC ~'.'- ~>~:i~

'(1l;~(1(~ '.;~~~:' Oc\ ;jl)!~S j·f~;:rt:,r':tc;:!\.('

4.2.4-821 
SPECIFI C..;TI0:\S: 

I -\IR CO\\'ERSIO\ L\rTS 

I -\IR L\rT I :)PR\l GL \ 

DimenSIon,; Input i I)utoul i \\ei2hl I \lodel (inchesl \-ollaee PSI i-PSI (F\i -r Discnar!!e Te:no. ; (Pounds! \lode! 

\Cl·SOO·16FT JGH\·303·16Fr:' ')35 II -1mml I
 

-\(l·SOO·l~fY 6 \ 3 \ :> n!a 100 10 30 .-\mblent 3.S JGH\ ·303· 1-1 FI : 039 L9Rmmi I
 

-\(lj·500·16DE .JGH\ ·SOJ·lfiDE !rJ70 (Ulmml I
 

-\CL·S50·16FF JG\H·SOJ·16FF i 055 (l-1mmlI
 

-\CL·550·I~FY 36 \ 9 \ -T i 10\ \ 15,\ I lOO 10 30 180 e F 50 JGH\-S03·I-1FY 1039 r.9Rmmll
 

-\([·550·16DE .JGH\·5OJ-IGDE 1.070 (1.8mml I
 

I -\Cl·560-16FF -I JGH\·503·HiFF lOSS tfTmmll _.­

J,CL'·560·14F!· 36 \ 9 '\--1 110\ ~- I~.-\ - 100 10 30 to 210 c F I 50 JGH\-303'I-IFl I .ilJ9 (YHmml 

-\Cl·560·16DE JGH\-503-lfiDE 1070 (l.8mml 

\ole: .-\11 .-\CL models allow the opllonal use at Tenon·linea Dainl CUDS (\Iooel TLC3031 ane 2'/, gallon oalf)[ lan;;.s (\locel PT·3}!)1 \\1 ,;\';lemS InclUde 

a 30' air hose assemhl\ 

I-\IR TCRBI:'\ES 

.-\IR U:\IT : SPR\l CD , DimenSIOns Inout oUlQUl : \\ej~hl I I '.Iodel I , \lodel , Tip :Size i1nchesl I \ollaee I PSI , PSI I Cell , Discharee TemD. I (Pounds) . I I 

-\TL'·520·16FF I .JGH\'-503·1GFF 1055 {l-lmml I i 20 \ 14 \ 12 110V '( 15r\ nla -1 .:J- 16 ! 180 0 F I -15 -\TL·520· J-IF! JG\H-:i03·1~r:· i 0391.9Rmmii I I I ! I i I JG\H-503·) 6FF [ 055 (l4mml I I I 32 x 1<l \ 12 I 110V \ 15.-\ I n!a I -15 I 16 ) ISO c F I 55 -\TL'·530·t6 F'F I 

JGIH·j03·I-IFY i ;119 iYHmml! 

\Ole: Each .-\TL·320 system Includes Tenon'llned pali1t::.m (\hlde: TLCSo:'l\ anc oaln! tanKS are oplional Eacn \TL ·;)3() ~\:itcm :i1CiUOe:; J 1':, 

gallon palOllan~ (\Iooel PT5301 ana Dalm CUDS are OOlIonat.l,11 S\Slems Inciuoe a 30' air hose assemblY 

CAPS, TIPS AND \EEDLES: H\LP I\FOR.\I.-\TIO\: 

I -\Tl-530·1-1 FY 

-

DeVilbiss has made a major commitment [0 _ 11\7P Tip Size Fluid TiD .-\Ir Cap '1 \eedle H\lP ~echnoi()gy inCluding ~eseat'C~. appilGlliO(1 

_L8(.70mm) JGHV·6,: • ,; JGHV·16·12 JGHV·404·G 

I .034 (.85mml . JGHV·60Hj\ JGHv·16·12 JGHH04-GX 

.039 (.98mmf JGHV·60 j·FY JGH\·16·14 JGHV-40Hi' 

055 (1.4mml JGHV·60HF JGH\··16·14 JGH\-404·FF 

.070 (1.801011 JGHV·60 L·DE JGHV·16·16 JGHV-404-DE 

.... ­ e:12meering. nationwIde soare parts ano ~em('e. :::.­

-........ ­ ",-s-a-resuil De\'i1blss H\LP systems renect-­

our 100·year reputation as spray finishing 

and atomization experts. =­ =­ Our free pamphlet (Form no. F·81 II clesCrJht's '--­ =.- , 

When ordering. specify air sUDply mOdel. JGH\ gun model ana paint thiS ne-.\ tectmology..-\s~ your De\llblss 

cup. supply lank ane «lP/liP oplions :iistrirlU[Or for a cnP\ Or' ((111 I-ROO-Dt:\·.l-pn. 

U.S. Regional Offices 

520 \Vharton Circie 

P.O. Box 43226 

..l..t1ama. G.A 30336 

404 696-4988 

8205 S. Cass 

SUite 102 

Darien. IL 60559· 

312 969{)440 

i 2878 Florence .",-venue 

Sama Fe Sprmgs. c.; 90670 

213 944-1111 

300 Phillips ..l..ve:1ue 

P.O.30x913 

TOIF-do. Ohio 43692 

70-2169 

National Automotive Sales Group 

2455 S. [ndustriaL SUite C 

.';nn :\rOOr. \1l48104 

31399+8800 

Customer sen'ice & Order Entry 

1·800·0EV-4448 (L.:.S. Onl\') 

Distributed by: 

Canadian Offices 

Vancouver. British Columbia 

604 294-3787 

Toronto.Ontano 

.l 16789· 1866 

\ !ontreal. Quebec 

5 i-! 326·96';0 

Bame. OntarIO 

705 728-.5501 

Sales and sef\lce available in 

rmncirJal cities [hrOu~hol![ ~"!e world. 

1 DeVILBISS Cs~-= 4.2.4-822 

The DeVilbiss Company 

Toledo. Ohio 43692 

\lodels and Soectfi(atl{Jn~ SUOt('(';. to cnan£:'~ ',\ Itnout notIce ~: ~B

'S) 1989 The De\ ilblss ComD3,~,\ ~?a~'.e~il~ts-':':0t~':~o~:n~,u~-----_·-_·---- --'.~::n"'.,".::._c -,":i...:-:\ _