alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

I I 

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless 

it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0409. The time required to complete this information 

collection is estimated to average 6 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the 

data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 

OMB Approved 

0579-0409 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE 

NATIONAL VETERINARY SERVICES LABORATORIES 

P.O. BOX 844, 1920 DAYTON AVENUE 

AMES, IOWA 50010 

515-337-7514 

BSE SURVEILLANCE SUBMISSION 

FORM 

CONTINUATION SHEET 

PAGE of 

1. BSE REFERRAL NUMBER 

2. SAMPLE INFORMATION 

17 26 35 44 

 BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

18 27 36 45 

 BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

19 28 37 46 

BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

20 29 38 47 

BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

21 30 39 48 

BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

22 31 40 49 

BSE Sample ID BSE Sample D I BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

23 32 41 50 

BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

I 

24 33 42 51 

I

BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID BSE Sample ID 

3. ADDITIONAL DATA (attach additional page(s), if needed) Accession Number 

4. SIGNATURE OF SUBMITTER 

VS FORM 17-146A 

FEB 2014 
 

 

 

 

 

 

VS FORM 17-146A INSTRUCTIONS 

The BSE Surveillance Submission Form (VS 17-146) has space to attach identification numbers for 20 animals. If additional animals are 

sampled, submit VS 17-146A to list additional animals. VS Form 17-146A should not be submitted without an accompanying VS 17-146 and 

the appropriate number of forms VS 17-131 for each animal listed. 

PAGE 

Enter the number for this page out of the total number of pages submitted (e.g., 2 of 3). 

1. BSE REFERRAL NUMBER 

The number must correspond to the number listed on the related VS Form 17-146. See instructions for VS 17-146 for details on preferred numbering 

format. 

2. SAMPLE INFORMATION 

Place barcodes for up to 32 additional animals in the spaces provided. See instructions for VS 17-146 regarding barcode availability and distribution. 

3. ADDITIONAL DATA 

Use this block to provide other pertinent information not captured elsewhere on VS 17-146 or VS 17-131. 

4. SIGNATURE OF SUBMITTER 

The submitter must sign each page of the form. 

Accession Number block is reserved for use by the testing laboratory.
^COURT OF APPEALS

mirt of Appeals District

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

:opy

2/18/2015 COA Case No. 12-13-00136-CR

PRIDGEN, ROBERT LYNN Tr. Ct. No. 29956 PD-0186-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's motion for an extension of time

in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition

has been extended to Monday, April 06, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL

BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition for Discretionary Review must be filed with

the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 936 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all students should 

have access to the digital tools necessary to further their education 

and compete in the 21st century economy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. WELCH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

all students should have access to the digital tools necessary to further their education and compete in the 

21st century economy. 

Whereas the United States should lead the world in providing 

high-quality education and opportunities to its citizens; 

Whereas digital skills are essential for education and preparing citizens for the economy of the future; 

Whereas, on a daily basis, teachers across the country assign 

homework that requires Internet access to be completed; 

Whereas there are 5,000,000 households with school-age children in the United States that do not have high-speed 

Internet access at home and fall into what is known as 

the ‘‘homework gap’’; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 936 IH 

Whereas a disproportionate number of students without highspeed Internet access at home reside in low-income and 

minority households; 

Whereas students and families in rural areas face additional 

challenges when homework requires Internet access that 

is out of reach; 

Whereas every student deserves an opportunity at 21st century success; 

Whereas participation in the classroom can be improved when 

all students are equipped with the tools to complete their 

homework; 

Whereas educators can increase the use of cutting-edge education technology and digital learning resources when 

those resources remain accessible during out-of-school 

hours; 

Whereas data show that students have received lower grades 

and been unable to complete their assignments because of 

their lack of Internet access at home; 

Whereas improved student access to postsecondary education 

and workforce opportunities can be made possible by increasing the ability of students to apply for employment, 

postsecondary education, and financial aid opportunities; 

Whereas leaders in the public and private sectors have recognized that the homework gap is an issue of national importance and partnered to find cooperative solutions to 

address it; and 

Whereas instilling digital skills and the knowledge to succeed 

in the 21st century economy in the Nation’s students is 

vital to the Nation’s global competitiveness: Now, therefore, be it 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 936 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that all students should have access to the 

3 digital tools necessary to further their education and com4 pete in the 21st century economy. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019230EN.01005201.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/52

---

Order of the General Court of 10 May 2019 — Zott v EUIPO — TSC Food Products (Ready-to-eat rectangular cake)

(Case T-517/18) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Community design representing a ready-to-eat rectangular cake - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - No different overall impression - Designer’s degree of freedom - Informed user - Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 230/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Zott SE & Co. KG (Mertingen, Germany) (represented by: E. Schalast, R. Lange and C. Böhler, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: TSC Food Products GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: M. Gaderer, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2018 (Case R 1341/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between TSC Food Products and Zott.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Zott SE & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Zott SE & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
#### RONNIE VAN ZANT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Artimus PYLE, et al., Defendants.

17 Civ. 3360 (RWS)

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 13, 2017

Pauline McTernan, Richard Gerard Haddad, Otterbourg P.C., Sandor Frankel, Frankel -& Abrams, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Evan Mandel, Robert Allen Glunt, Man-del Bhandari, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

Sweet, D.J.

In its Opinion and Order dated August 23, 2017 (the “Opinion,” Dkt. No. 61), the Court determined, *inter alia,*that Defendants Cleopatra Records, Inc. (“Cleopatra Records”), Cleopatra Films (together with Cleopatra Records, “Cleopatra”), and Arti-mus Pyle (“Pyle” and, together with Cleopatra, the “Defendants”) engaged in actions in violation of the Consent Order, Judgment, and Decree dated October 11, 1988 (the “Consent Order”). The Court concluded further that Plaintiffs Ronnie Van Zant, Inc., Gary R. Rossington, John*411ny Van Zant, Barbara Houston, as the Trustee of the Allen Collins Trust, and Alicia Rapp and Carinna Gaines Biemiller, as the personal representatives of the estate of Steven Gaines (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) were entitled to a permanent injunction and an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. (See Opinion at 1.)

On August 30, 2017, the Court requested the parties submit proposed judgment language, and attorneys’ fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 68.) The conflicting proposed judgments and authorities in support have been received. (See Dkt. Nos. 69, 71, 72.)

The annexed Judgment, dated September 13, 2017, is appropriate to ensure com tinued adherence to the Consent Order’s strictures, which include circumscribed use of the name Lynyrd Skynyrd and name, likeness, -portrait, picture, performances, or biographical material of Ronald Van Zant or Steven Gaines. This -relief is focused on the protection of Plaintiffs’ rights, which have been violated by Defendants’ film in its present form.

The requested destruction of Defendants’ film is denied at this time without prejudice to renewal in the event that any use of the film is alleged to violate the Judgment.

Defendants were appropriately charged with the clear terms of the Consent Order by July 2016. The actions of all Defendants thereafter continued to violate the “in concert or participation with” portions of the Consent Order as detailed in the Opinion and, as violators of the Consent Order, they are bound by its terms, including with respect to attorneys’ fees; (See Opinion at 4-6,40-42,61-62.)

It is so ordered.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 856 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 856

 Expressing support for designation of the week of September 12, 2016, 
       through September 18, 2016, as ``Balance Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2016

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas submitted the following resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of the week of September 12, 2016, 
       through September 18, 2016, as ``Balance Awareness Week''.

Whereas vestibular (inner-ear-balance) disorders are underdiagnosed and 
        undertreated;
Whereas as many as 35 percent of adults 40 years of age and older in the United 
        States, approximately 69,000,000 people in the United States, have 
        experienced some form of vestibular dysfunction;
Whereas 80 percent of people 65 years of age and older have experienced 
        dizziness;
Whereas vestibular disorder patients may consult four or more physicians and 
        spend 50 months or more in their search for a diagnosis;
Whereas the Vestibular Disorders Association celebrates ``Balance Awareness 
        Week'' to reduce the time it takes to diagnose a vestibular disorder by 
        helping patients recognize their symptoms and encouraging them to seek 
        help from a qualified vestibular specialist; and
Whereas the week of September 12, 2016, through September 18, 2016, would be an 
        appropriate week to designate as ``Balance Awareness Week: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Balance Awareness Week''; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the importance of raising public awareness 
        about vestibular disorders.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018152EN.01004201.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/42

---

Action brought on 23 February 2018 — Pink Lady America v CPVO — WAAA (Cripps Pink)

(Case T-112/18)

(2018/C 152/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pink Lady America LLC (Yakima, Washington, United States) (represented by: R. Manno and S. Travaglio, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Western Australian Agriculture Authority (WAAA) (South Perth, Australia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before CPVO

Details of the proceedings before CPVO

Proprietor of the Community plant variety right at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community plant variety right at issue:

Community Plant variety right at issue: Community Plant Variety Right No EU1640, apple variety Cripps Pink

Community Plant variety right at issue

Procedure before CPVO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity.

Procedure before CPVO

Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 14 September 2017 in Case A007/2016

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the Cripps Pink apple tree variety CPVR No 1640 for lack of novelty according to Article 10 along with Article 20 of Regulation No 2100/94; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Cripps Pink apple tree variety CPVR No 1640 for lack of novelty according to Article 10 along with Article 20 of Regulation No 2100/94;

| — | order the CPVO and the Western Australian Agriculture Authority to bear the costs and expenses of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the CPVO and the Western Australian Agriculture Authority to bear the costs and expenses of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the combined provisions of Articles 10 and 20 of Regulation No 2100/94; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the combined provisions of Articles 10 and 20 of Regulation No 2100/94;

| — | Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 2100/94 and of the general principles of law on legal certainty and sound administration of justice in conjunction with Article 50(3) of Regulation No 874/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 2100/94 and of the general principles of law on legal certainty and sound administration of justice in conjunction with Article 50(3) of Regulation No 874/2009.

---
#### Walton Land and Timber Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed April 20, 1915.

A plea of *res adjudicata*that does not aver a final judgment or other final disposition of a prior action between the same parties for the same cause of action is subject to demurrer.

Writ of error to Circuit Court for Walton County; .M. F. Horne, Judge.

Judgment reversed.

*8. K. C'iTUs,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Daniel Campbell*& *8on,*for Defendant in Error.

Wi-iiteield, J.

In an action against the railroad company to recover damages for the loss of a mule injured while being transported, among other pleas filed was one of res adjudicata in which it is averred that in a former suit between the same parties for the same cause of action, a demurrer to the evidence was joined in by the plaintiff, and the judge “did thereupon give his opinion and decide that the said demurrer was well taken and did sustain the same.” A demurrer to this plea of res adjudicata was overruled and final judgment was thereupon rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff took writ of error. As the plea does not aver a final judgment or other final disposition of the prior suit, the demurrer to the plea should have been sustained. See McKinnon v. Johnson, 57 Fla. 120, 48 South. Rep. 910.

The judgment is reversed.

Taylor, G. J., and Shackleford,' Cockrell and Ellis, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT OT
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), I,
Christopher J. Amenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Christopher J. Amenson

Christopher J. Amenson
Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2003
- Blank Page
- Blank Page
EXHIBIT 4

 FILED IN 13th COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI/EDINBURG, TEXAS 6/2/2015 5:57:40 PM DORIAN E. RAMIREZ Clerk
Exhibit 12.1
 NEENAH ENTERPRISES, INC.
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 For the Years Ended September 30,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Earnings to fixed charges
calculation (1)Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
    
    $
    (174,362
    )
    
    $
    (17,173
    )
    
    $
    (22,747
    )
    
    $
    25,006
    
    
    $
    18,504Fixed charges
    
    
    34,814
    
    
    
    33,344
    
    
    
    32,695
    
    
    
    34,384
    
    
    
    34,392$
    (139,548
    )
    
    $
    16,171
    
    
    $
    9,948
    
    
    $
    59,390
    
    
    $
    52,896Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    33,947
    
    
    $
    32,469
    
    
    $
    31,700
    
    
    $
    33,410
    
    
    $
    33,419Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    867
    
    
    
    875
    
    
    
    995
    
    
    
    974
    
    
    
    973$
    34,814
    
    
    $
    33,344
    
    
    $
    32,695
    
    
    $
    34,384
    
    
    $
    34,392Ratio of earning to fixed charges
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    1.73
    
    
    
    1.54
 
 (1)
    
    For purposes of the computation, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been calculated
by dividing (a) income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges by
(b) fixed charges. Fixed charges are equal to interest expense plus the portion of the rent
expense estimated to represent interest.(2)
    
    Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the years ended September 30, 2009,
2008 and 2007 by $174.4 million, $17.2 million, and $22.7 million, respectively.
# C_2021079EN.01000501.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Saarlandes — Germany) — QM v Finanzamt Saarbrücken

(Case C-288/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(c) - Supplies of services for consideration - Article 26(1) - Transactions treated as supplies of services for consideration - Article 56(2) - Determination of the point of reference for tax purposes - Hiring of means of transport - Making cars available to employees)

(2021/C 79/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht des Saarlandes

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: QM

Defendant: Finanzamt Saarbrücken

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of the first subparagraph of Article 56(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008, the act of making a vehicle forming part of the assets of the business of a taxable person available to one of that taxable person’s employees does not fall within the scope of that provision if that transaction does not constitute a supply of services for consideration within the meaning of Article 2(1)(c) of that directive. By contrast, the first subparagraph of Article 56(2) of Directive 2006/112 does apply to such a transaction if it involves a supply of services for consideration within the meaning of Article 2(1)(c) of that directive and if that employee has a permanent right to use that vehicle for private purposes and to exclude other persons from using it, in exchange for rent and for an agreed period of more than 30 days.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.

---