### 40444 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2013 / Notices

CPSC–2009–0066, or by mail/hand delivery/courier (for paper, disk, or CD– ROM submissions), preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Request for Renewal of Approval of Collections of Information. Section 9.1 of ASTM F977–07 (which has been incorporated by reference in the safety standard for infant walkers, 16 CFR part 1216) requires infant walkers to be provided with easy-to-read instructions regarding assembly, maintenance, cleaning, and

use.

There are 16 known firms supplying infant walkers to the U.S. market. All 16 firms are assumed to use labels already on both their products and their packaging, but they might need to make some modifications to their existing labels as a result of the mandatory rule. The estimated time required to make these modifications is about one hour per model. Each of these firms supplies an average of four different models of infant walkers; therefore, the estimated burden hours associated with labels is 1 hour × 16 firms × 4 models per firm = 64 annual hours.

Section 9.1 of ASTM F977–07 requires instructions to be supplied with the product. Supplying instructions with infant walkers is a usual and customary practice, as these products generally require some assembly, often necessitating instruction. There are no burden hours associated with the instruction requirement in section 9.1 because any burden associated with supplying instructions with infant walkers would be ‘‘usual and customary’’ and not within the definition of ‘‘burden’’ under OMB’s regulations.

CPSC staff estimates that hourly compensation for the time required to create and update labels is $27.12 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ‘‘Employer Costs for Employee Compensation,’’ December 2012, Table 9, total compensation for all sales and office workers in goods-producing private industries: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ ). Therefore, the estimated annual cost associated with the proposed requirements is $1,736 ($27.12 per hour

× 64 hours = $1,736).

Dated: July 1, 2013. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–16120 Filed 7–3–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION** 

**[CPSC Docket No. 12–1, CPSC Docket No. 12–2 and CPSC Docket No. 13–2]** 

**Notice of Telephonic Prehearing Conference** 

**AGENCY :**  U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  Notice of telephonic prehearing conference for the consolidated case: In the Matter of MAXFIELD AND OBERTON HOLDINGS, LLC; CRAIG ZUCKER, individually and as officer of MAXFIELD AND OBERTON HOLDINGS, LLC; ZEN MAGNETS, LLC; and STAR NETWORKS USA, LLC; CPSC Docket No. 12–1; CPSC Docket No. 12–2; and CPSC Docket No. 13–2.

**DATES :**  July 29, 2013, 12:00 p.m. Mountain/1:00 p.m. Central/2:00 p.m. Eastern.

**ADDRESSES :**  Members of the public are welcome to attend the prehearing conference at the Courtroom of Hon. Dean C. Metry at 601 25th Street, 5th Floor Courtroom, Galveston, Texas
77550.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jan Emig, Paralegal Specialist, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Program, (409) 765–1300.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Any or all of the following shall be considered during the prehearing conference:

(1) Petitions for leave to intervene; (2) Motions, including motions for consolidation of proceedings and for certification of class actions;

(3) Identification, simplification and clarification of the issues;

(4) Necessity or desirability of amending the pleadings;

(5) Stipulations and admissions of fact and of the content and authenticity of documents;

(6) Oppositions to notices of depositions;

(7) Motions for protective orders to limit or modify discovery;

(8) Issuance of subpoenas to compel the appearance of witnesses and the production of documents; (9) Limitation of the number of witnesses, particularly to avoid duplicate expert witnesses;

(10) Matters of which official notice should be taken and matters which may be resolved by reliance upon the laws administered by the Commission or upon the Commission’s substantive standards, regulations, and consumer product safety rules;

(11) Disclosure of the names of witnesses and of documents or other physical exhibits which are intended to be introduced into evidence;

(12) Consideration of offers of settlement;

(13) Establishment of a schedule for the exchange of final witness lists, prepared testimony and documents, and for the date, time and place of the hearing, with due regard to the convenience of the parties; and

(14) Such other matters as may aid in the efficient presentation or disposition of the proceedings.

Telephonic conferencing arrangements to contact the parties will be made by the court. Mary B. Murphy, Esq. and Jennifer Argabright, Esq., Counsel for the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, shall be contacted by a third party conferencing center at (301) 504–7809. David C. Japha, Esq., Counsel for ZEN MAGNETS, LLC and STAR NETWORKS USA, LLC shall be contacted by a third party conferencing center at (303) 964–9500. John R. Fleder, Esq., Counsel for CRAIG ZUCKER, shall be contacted by a third party conferencing center at (202) 737–4580. Erika Z. Jones, Esq., Counsel for CRAIG ZUCKER, shall be contacted by a third party conferencing center at (202) 263–
3232.

Authority: Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2064.

Dated: June 28, 2013. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–16119 Filed 7–3–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Amendment of the Threat Reduction Advisory Committee** 

**AGENCY :**  DoD.

**ACTION :**  Amendment of Federal Advisory Committee.

**SUMMARY :**  Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix), the Government in the Sunshine Act of