40444 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2013 / Notices 

CPSC–2009–0066, or by mail/hand 

delivery/courier (for paper, disk, or CD– 

ROM submissions), preferably in five 

copies, to: Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

Consumer Product Safety Commission, 

Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, 

Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 

504–7923. For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 

504–7815, or by email to: 

rsquibb@cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request 

for Renewal of Approval of Collections 

of Information. Section 9.1 of ASTM 

F977–07 (which has been incorporated 

by reference in the safety standard for 

infant walkers, 16 CFR part 1216) 

requires infant walkers to be provided 

with easy-to-read instructions regarding 

assembly, maintenance, cleaning, and 

use. 

There are 16 known firms supplying 

infant walkers to the U.S. market. All 16 

firms are assumed to use labels already 

on both their products and their 

packaging, but they might need to make 

some modifications to their existing 

labels as a result of the mandatory rule. 

The estimated time required to make 

these modifications is about one hour 

per model. Each of these firms supplies 

an average of four different models of 

infant walkers; therefore, the estimated 

burden hours associated with labels is 1 

hour × 16 firms × 4 models per firm = 

64 annual hours. 

Section 9.1 of ASTM F977–07 

requires instructions to be supplied 

with the product. Supplying 

instructions with infant walkers is a 

usual and customary practice, as these 

products generally require some 

assembly, often necessitating 

instruction. There are no burden hours 

associated with the instruction 

requirement in section 9.1 because any 

burden associated with supplying 

instructions with infant walkers would 

be ‘‘usual and customary’’ and not 

within the definition of ‘‘burden’’ under 

OMB’s regulations. 

CPSC staff estimates that hourly 

compensation for the time required to 

create and update labels is $27.12 (U.S. 

Bureau of Labor Statistics, ‘‘Employer 

Costs for Employee Compensation,’’ 

December 2012, Table 9, total 

compensation for all sales and office 

workers in goods-producing private 

industries: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/). 

Therefore, the estimated annual cost 

associated with the proposed 

requirements is $1,736 ($27.12 per hour 

× 64 hours = $1,736). 

Dated: July 1, 2013. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2013–16120 Filed 7–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[CPSC Docket No. 12–1, CPSC Docket No. 

12–2 and CPSC Docket No. 13–2] 

Notice of Telephonic Prehearing 

Conference 

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice of telephonic 

prehearing conference for the 

consolidated case: In the Matter of 

MAXFIELD AND OBERTON 

HOLDINGS, LLC; CRAIG ZUCKER, 

individually and as officer of 

MAXFIELD AND OBERTON 

HOLDINGS, LLC; ZEN MAGNETS, LLC; 

and STAR NETWORKS USA, LLC; 

CPSC Docket No. 12–1; CPSC Docket 

No. 12–2; and CPSC Docket No. 13–2. 

DATES: July 29, 2013, 12:00 p.m. 

Mountain/1:00 p.m. Central/2:00 p.m. 

Eastern. 

ADDRESSES: Members of the public are 

welcome to attend the prehearing 

conference at the Courtroom of Hon. 

Dean C. Metry at 601 25th Street, 5th 

Floor Courtroom, Galveston, Texas 

77550. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan 

Emig, Paralegal Specialist, U.S. Coast 

Guard ALJ Program, (409) 765–1300. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any or all 

of the following shall be considered 

during the prehearing conference: 

(1) Petitions for leave to intervene; 

(2) Motions, including motions for 

consolidation of proceedings and for 

certification of class actions; 

(3) Identification, simplification and 

clarification of the issues; 

(4) Necessity or desirability of 

amending the pleadings; 

(5) Stipulations and admissions of fact 

and of the content and authenticity of 

documents; 

(6) Oppositions to notices of 

depositions; 

(7) Motions for protective orders to 

limit or modify discovery; 

(8) Issuance of subpoenas to compel 

the appearance of witnesses and the 

production of documents; 

(9) Limitation of the number of 

witnesses, particularly to avoid 

duplicate expert witnesses; 

(10) Matters of which official notice 

should be taken and matters which may 

be resolved by reliance upon the laws 

administered by the Commission or 

upon the Commission’s substantive 

standards, regulations, and consumer 

product safety rules; 

(11) Disclosure of the names of 

witnesses and of documents or other 

physical exhibits which are intended to 

be introduced into evidence; 

(12) Consideration of offers of 

settlement; 

(13) Establishment of a schedule for 

the exchange of final witness lists, 

prepared testimony and documents, and 

for the date, time and place of the 

hearing, with due regard to the 

convenience of the parties; and 

(14) Such other matters as may aid in 

the efficient presentation or disposition 

of the proceedings. 

Telephonic conferencing 

arrangements to contact the parties will 

be made by the court. Mary B. Murphy, 

Esq. and Jennifer Argabright, Esq., 

Counsel for the U.S. Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, shall be contacted 

by a third party conferencing center at 

(301) 504–7809. David C. Japha, Esq., 

Counsel for ZEN MAGNETS, LLC and 

STAR NETWORKS USA, LLC shall be 

contacted by a third party conferencing 

center at (303) 964–9500. John R. Fleder, 

Esq., Counsel for CRAIG ZUCKER, shall 

be contacted by a third party 

conferencing center at (202) 737–4580. 

Erika Z. Jones, Esq., Counsel for CRAIG 

ZUCKER, shall be contacted by a third 

party conferencing center at (202) 263– 

3232. 

Authority: Consumer Product Safety Act, 

15 U.S.C. 2064. 

Dated: June 28, 2013. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–16119 Filed 7–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Amendment of the Threat Reduction 

Advisory Committee 

AGENCY: DoD. 

ACTION: Amendment of Federal 

Advisory Committee. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act of 

1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix), the 

Government in the Sunshine Act of 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES