alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020271EN.01001201.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești — Romania) — Asociaţia ‘Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor’ v TM, UN, Asociaţia DMPA

(Case C-88/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Directive 92/43/EEC - Article 12(1) - System of strict protection of animal species - Annex IV - Canis lupus (wolf) - Article 16(1) - Natural range - Capture and relocation of a wild animal of the species canis lupus - Public safety)

(2020/C 271/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Zărnești

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Asociaţia ‘Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor’

Defendants: TM, UN, Asociaţia DMPA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(1)(a) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, as amended by Directive 2013/17/EU of 13 May 2013, must be interpreted as meaning that the capture and relocation of a specimen of an animal species protected under Annex IV to that directive, such as the wolf, on the outskirts of a human settlement area or within such an area, can fall within the scope of the prohibition laid down in that provision.

Article 16(1) of that directive must be interpreted as meaning that any form of deliberate capture of specimens of that animal species in the aforementioned circumstances is prohibited in the absence of a derogation granted by the competent national authority on the basis of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.

---
1

Plum Pox Quarantined Areas

7 CFR § 301.74-3(a)

Last update: October 18, 2019

No areas in the United States are quarantined for plum pox.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Todd E. Wille, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Unify Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants third fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| | /s/ TODD E. WILLE            
| | -----------------------------
| | Todd E. Wille                
| | President and Chief Executive
| | Officer                      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: April 30, 2007



---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-05223 of Healthsource, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No.
33-43242, No. 33-49856, No. 33-76910 and No. 33-80456 of Healthsource, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated February 26, 1997 (February 28, 1997 as to Note 15)
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Healthsource, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 1997
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Citrus Canker in Texas

Last Modified: 

Print
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 759 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of the 

International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) nuclear security role. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2016 

Mr. FOSTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in 

support of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s 

(IAEA) nuclear security role. 

Whereas the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 

created in 1957 for the purpose of assisting states in the 

development and use of nuclear technology for peaceful 

purposes, plays a critical role in the global nuclear security regime; 

Whereas the agency’s activities in nuclear security date back 

to the 1970s when the agency began providing ad hoc 

training courses in physical protection; 

Whereas these responsibilities expanded following the collapse 

of the former Soviet Union, reports of nuclear smuggling 

in the late 1990s, and again after the devastating terror 

attacks on September 11, 2001; 


emcdonald on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 759 IH 

Whereas the agency established the Nuclear Security Fund to 

assist countries in protecting their nuclear and radiological materials and facilities; 

Whereas the agency’s nuclear security efforts are sustained 

by its technical expertise, experience, transparency, and 

confidentiality; 

Whereas rogue regimes and clandestine organizations continue to exhibit the ambition to acquire nuclear materials 

that can be used to build crude radiological and nuclear 

weapons; 

Whereas the IAEA Office of Nuclear Security relies almost 

exclusively on voluntary funding, which is inherently unpredictable and inconsistent; and 

Whereas the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, 

DC, issued an Action Plan on April 1, 2016, citing the 

agency’s need for ‘‘reliable and sufficient resources’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) maintains that the International Atomic 

3 Energy Agency (IAEA) plays an indispensable role 

4 in strengthening nuclear security and safety around 

5 the globe; 

6 (2) reaffirms that the United States has a vital 

7 interest in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons 

8 and securing nuclear materials; and 

9 (3) encourages the United States and other 

10 member states of the IAEA to take steps to ensure 


emcdonald on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 759 IH 

1 that the IAEA has the resources needed to success2 fully carry out its duties, including— 

3 (A) supporting the IAEA to continue con4 vening ministerial meetings on nuclear security 

5 to promote political commitment; 

6 (B) contributing to the implementation of 

7 the IAEA’s Nuclear Security Plan through reli8 able and sufficient resources; 

9 (C) providing appropriate political, tech10 nical, and financial support to the Nuclear Se11 curity Fund; and 

12 (D) developing a comprehensive strategy to 

13 encourage non-state, private sector contribu14 tions to the Nuclear Security Fund. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019025EN.01006201.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/62

---

Action brought on 26 November 2018 — Kalypso Media Group v EUIPO — Wizards of the Coast (DUNGEONS)

(Case T-700/18)

(2019/C 25/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kalypso Media Group GmbH (Worms, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wizards of the Coast LLC (Pawtucket, Rhode Island, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark DUNGEONS — Application for registration No 13 271 838

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2018 in Case R 599/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2019432EN.01004901.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2019 — Boxer Barcelona v EUIPO — X-Technology Swiss (XBOXER BARCELONA)

(Case T-582/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark XBOXER BARCELONA - Earlier EU figurative mark representing the letter ‘x’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Evidence - Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Restriction of the application for registration before the Board of Appeal - Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2019/C 432/57)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Boxer Barcelona, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: X-Technology Swiss GmbH (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Zafar, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2018 (Case R 2186/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between X-Technology Swiss and Boxer Barcelona.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Boxer Barcelona, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Boxer Barcelona, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                           EXHIBIT 27
                                      FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

                                       TREMONT ADVISERS, INC.
                                         SEPTEMBER 30, 1998

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<LEGEND>
   
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  UNAUDITED SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND FOR PERIOD
THEN ENDED.  THIS  INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 

</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000880320                        
<NAME>   Tremont Advisers, Inc.                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998                               
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,322,228
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,703,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,195,709
<PP&E>                                         849,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (479,139)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,854,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,389,687
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       42,193
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,919,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,854,787
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,623,468
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,806,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,773,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                   655,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,117,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,117,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.26
        


                                        58

</TABLE>
# C_2020240EN.01002601.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/26

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2020 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-276/19) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Derogations - Simplification measures and measures to prevent tax evasion or avoidance - Article 395(2) - Obligation incumbent on Member States to notify the European Commission of special measures intended to simplify the procedure for charging VAT - Substantial amendment of the measure initially notified)

(2020/C 240/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and J. Jokubauskaitė, acting as Agents)

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: F. Shibli, acting as Agent, O. Thomas QC and R. Hill, Barrister)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by introducing new simplification measures that extend the zero-rating and the exception to the normal requirement to keep value added tax records which were provided for in the Value Added Tax (Terminal Markets) Order 1973, as amended by the Value Added Tax (Terminal Markets) (Amendment) Order 1975, without submitting an application to the European Commission with a view to seeking the authorisation of the Council of the European Union, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 395(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by introducing new simplification measures that extend the zero-rating and the exception to the normal requirement to keep value added tax records which were provided for in the Value Added Tax (Terminal Markets) Order 1973, as amended by the Value Added Tax (Terminal Markets) (Amendment) Order 1975, without submitting an application to the European Commission with a view to seeking the authorisation of the Council of the European Union, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 395(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.

---
√

Checklist for Cleaning and 

Disinfecting Poultry Enclosures

Keeping poultry houses, coops, and other enclosures clean is one of the best 

ways to prevent germs from spreading among poultry flocks. A thorough cleaning, 

and then applying disinfectant, takes time. But the process is vital to stop disease 

spread and keep our flocks healthy. 

If you see or suspect anything unusual, call your flock supervisor, veterinarian, or 

cooperative extension office right away. Use this form to record phone numbers 

for contacts in your area. The earlier you act, the easier it is to contain the disease 

to a single flock.

Check the list on the back for tips 

to help keep your flocks healthy.

Report Sick Birds

If you see signs of illness, take action right away! Phone Number

Veterinarian

Cooperative Extension Office

State Veterinarian/Animal or Poultry Diagnostic Lab

USDA 866.536.7593

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Checklist:Tips To Help Keep Your Flocks Healthy

This checklist is a general guide to practicing good biosecurity, but if you have a 

site-specific biosecurity plan, please follow it. Commercial growers should be sure their 

site-specific plans follow the National Poultry Improvement Plan biosecurity principles. 

Wear personal protective equipment or 

clothing and shoes that you only use when 

caring for your poultry. This includes boot 

covers or boots that can be disinfected. 

Change into fresh protective gear between 

poultry houses or coops.

Enclosures must be empty for a thorough 

cleaning. If you have a poultry house, wait

until the house is empty to start the cleaning 

process. If you have a coop or other type of 

enclosure, move the birds to a separate area 

before cleaning.

Remove all litter, manure, and other debris.

“Dry” clean all areas—brush, scrape, and 

shovel off manure, feathers, and other materials. 

Disinfectant will not penetrate organic matter or 

caked-on dirt.

“Wet” clean all surfaces—scrub with water 

and detergent. Work from top to bottom and 

back to front. 

Rinse all surfaces carefully with water.

Apply disinfectant according to the directions 

on the label. Be sure to use a disinfectant that is 

registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) and indicates that it is effective 

against avian influenza and other poultry diseases.

Leave the enclosure empty until it is completely 

dry. Use fans and/or open doors and windows to 

help speed the drying process. Wet surfaces can 

be harmful to poultry. 

When you’re done, remove and discard your 

protective gear. If using dedicated clothing and boots, 

change clothing and clean and disinfect your boots. 

Wash your hands thoroughly with soap and water. 

Wash and dry your dedicated clothing.

For more information about how to keep your flocks healthy, follow Defend the Flock on 

Facebook and Twitter and visit www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/defendtheflock.

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 2235-1 • Issued November 2018 USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

√
#### Waikoloa Dev. Co. v. County of Hawai'i

19149

5/21/97

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2020423EN.01001101.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Société Eco TLC v Ministre d’État, ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

(Case C-556/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Concept of ‘State resources’ - Increased responsibility of producers - Eco-body approved by the public authorities to collect financial contributions from those who place on the market certain products in order to be able to fulfil, on their behalf, their legal obligation to treat waste from those products - Financial support paid by that eco-body to contractually bound sorting operators)

(2020/C 423/16)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société Eco TLC

Defendants: Ministre d’État, ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Intervening party: Fédération des entreprises du recyclage

Operative part of the judgment

Article 107(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a system whereby a private, non-profit eco-body, approved by the public authorities, receives contributions from those who place on the market a particular category of product and who enter into a contract with it to that effect, in return for a service consisting in the organisation on their behalf of the treatment of the waste from those products, and redistributes to operators responsible for the sorting and recovery of that waste, subsidies the amount of which is set out in the approval, in the light of environmental and social targets, does not constitute an intervention through State resources within the meaning of that provision, as long as those subsidies are not constantly under public control, which is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---