alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-23-00431-CV 

COURT OF APPEALS 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

KATHERINE TIFFANY, Appellant,

v.

MELANIE VAN MAREN, Appellee.

On appeal from a Justice Court, Precinct 1, Place 3

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña 

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

Appellant, Melanie Van Maren, attempted to appeal a judgment in cause number

20EV-0211-JP13. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no 

final, appealable order. On October 12, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of 

this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within
2 

ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice or otherwise cure this 

defect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

id. R. 42.3(a), (c). 

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice 

Delivered and filed on the 

25th day of January, 2024.
#### Jean-Pierre v. Aoyagi

16691

1/04/95

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Thomas A. Murdock



Thomas A. Murdock

Chief Executive Officer





---

EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Dudley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Roger D. Dudley



Roger D. Dudley

Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

t0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148555

KONSTANTINE E. GEORVASSILIS,

Plai ntiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 148555

COA: 316174

MCAC: 11

- 000102

CHRYSLER GROUP, L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 19-05

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron E. Rippke 

Director

SUBJECT: Name Change for In Vitro Diagnostics (Test Kits) Intended to Detect 

Canine or Feline Heartworm Antigen. 

I. PURPOSE

The intended purpose for this Notice is to inform licensees, permittees, and 

applicants of a change in the True Name of applicable products.

II. BACKGROUND

The CVB is changing the True Name of products named “Canine Heartworm 

Antigen Test Kit” and “Feline Heartworm Antigen Test Kit” to “Heartworm Antigen 

Test Kit”. The product claim(s), as specified on labeling, will inform the user of the 

kit’s intention regarding test sample origin. 

III. ACTION (or POLICY)

The CVB will use the new nomenclature for products in the prelicense stage. For 

licensed and permitted products, revise Outlines of Production and labeling. All

affected firms must comply within two years of the date of this notice.

The CVB will reissue a new license or permit within 60 days of the date of the 

notice. It is not necessary for the firm to make a submission to request reissuance of 

a new license with an updated True Name.

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/APPLICABILITY

This action is effective immediately.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
19373

#### State v. Miller

Affirmed
# C_2019238EN.01001801.xml

| 15.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden)

(Case T-364/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MicroGarden - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 238/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Arçelik AS (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: A. Franke and E. Flach, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska, S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2018 (Case R 163/2018-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign MicroGarden as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Arçelik AS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arçelik AS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.

---
Exhibit 32.2



VERTEL CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Vertel Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc E. Maassen, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 15, 2003 |  | /s/ T. JAMES RANNEY                                           
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | T. James Ranney                                               
|                        |  | Vice President, Finance and Administration,                   
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary                         
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vertel Corporation and will be retained by Vertel Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1
    (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
otherwise stated in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Career Development Facilitating The Transition to Independence Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 15-16, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue RM: 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joshua Park, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue RM: 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208,                         *joshua.park4@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 8, 2023. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-27423 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 516 

Recognizing the individuals who have served, or are serving, in the Armed 

Forces and have also served, or are serving, as a peace officer or 

as a first responder and expressing support for the designation of November 10 as Armed Forces, Peace Officer, and First Responder Dual 

Service Recognition Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2015 

Mr. WENSTRUP submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the individuals who have served, or are serving, 

in the Armed Forces and have also served, or are serving, as a peace officer or as a first responder and expressing support for the designation of November 10 

as Armed Forces, Peace Officer, and First Responder 

Dual Service Recognition Day. 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces, peace officers, and 

first responders choose to run toward danger rather than 

away from it in times of need; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces, peace officers, and 

first responders serve and defend the public safety 365 

days a year; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 516 IH 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces, peace officers, and 

first responders often fail to receive recognition or appreciation for their consistent acts of service; 

Whereas it is particularly fitting to recognize individuals who 

are twice the servant, placing themselves at risk to defend the United States in the Armed Forces and sacrificing to protect and serve communities in the United 

States as a peace officer or as a first responder; and 

Whereas November 10 would be an appropriate date to designate as Armed Forces, Peace Officer, and First Responder Dual Service Recognition Day in recognition of 

the selfless Americans who have served in the Armed 

Forces and as a peace officer or as a first responder: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and honors individuals who have 

3 chosen to serve in the Armed Forces and also as a 

4 peace officer or as a first responder; and 

5 (2) supports the designation of Armed Forces, 

6 Peace Officer, and First Responder Dual Service 

7 Recognition Day. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
The Board of Directors 

Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries 

 

We are aware of theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20057, 333-20073, 333-31398, 333-76096, 333-76654, 333-85518, 333-106270, 333-106271) pertaining to Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries’ DeferredCompensation Plan and Retirement Plan of our report dated November 6, 2003 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries that are included in its Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2003. 

 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG, LLP 

 

November 6, 2003
# C_2018392EN.01003301.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/33

---

Action brought on 29 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC PARTNERS)

(Case T-520/18)

(2018/C 392/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BGC Partners LP (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: P. Walsh, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bankgirocentralen BGC AB (Stockholm, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BGC PARTNERS — European Union trade mark No 3 808 185

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 June 2018 in Case R 2185/2014-5.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, in so far as the Board of Appeal determined that the registration should be declared invalid for ‘financial affairs; monetary affairs; banking services; financial services; financial clearing’ in class 36; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, in so far as the Board of Appeal determined that the registration should be declared invalid for ‘financial affairs; monetary affairs; banking services; financial services; financial clearing’ in class 36;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings;

| — | alter the contested decision with regard to the order for costs and order, pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful intervener to pay the costs incurred in the Board of Appeal and the opposition proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision with regard to the order for costs and order, pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful intervener to pay the costs incurred in the Board of Appeal and the opposition proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal incorrectly found that evidence of use was sufficient to demonstrate genuine use of the mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal incorrectly found that evidence of use was sufficient to demonstrate genuine use of the mark;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Kết thúc cuộc chiến chống lại bệnh Scrapie!

Các cơ sở giết mổ lưu lại đầu cừu và dê

trưởng thành có thể được trả tiền.

Tại sao lại là bệnh Scrapie? Làm thế nào để trợ giúp?

Scrapie là căn bệnh cướp đi sinh mạng 

của cừu và dê, kéo theo hậu quả là kim 

ngạch xuất khẩu bị hạn chế. Ngành 

chăn nuôi cần quý vị trợ giúp trong việc 

tìm ra trường hợp mắc bệnh scrapie 

cuối cùng ở Hoa Kỳ để chứng minh 

rằng bệnh này đã biến mất tại Hoa Kỳ.

1. Lập thỏa thuận lấy mẫu

2. Giữ lại đầu cừu và dê trưởng thành*

3. Bảo quản phần đầu và TẤT CẢ tài 

liệu nhận dạng (chẳng hạn như thẻ 

đeo tai) trong tủ lạnh

*Động vật phải ít nhất 18 tháng 

tuổi.

$

Liên lạc

USDA là nhà cung cấp dịch vụ, nhà tuyển dụng lao động và bên 

cho vay với tôn chỉ cung cấp cơ hội bình đẳng cho mọi người.

Ban hành tháng Năm, 2023
<PAGE>
                                CSB BANCORP, INC.


                                   EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, John J. Limbert,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and A. Lee Miller, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


/s/ John J. Limbert                           /s/ A. Lee Miller
------------------------------                --------------------------------
John J. Limbert                               A. Lee Miller
President and                                 Senior Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                       24
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 089

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JORGE MAXIMO ESPINOZA

, A ppellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, A ppellee

.

On appeal from the 430 th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's second motion for extension of time

to file the brief. Appellant ’ s brief was originally due to be filed on October 7, 2013 , and

this Court has previously granted appellant an extension for the filing of appellant ’ s brief

in this cause. Appellant has now filed his second motion requesting additional time to2

file the app ellate brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's second motion for

extension of time to file the brief and the extension previously granted in this cause, is of

the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant' s second motion for extension of time

to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor

upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter.

Appellant's second motion for extension of t ime to file the brief is hereby

GRANTED , and the Honorable O. Rene Flores , counsel for appellant, is hereby

ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or before March 4, 2014 . Further

motions for extension of time will not be favorably entertained by the Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on the Hon orable

O. Rene Flores by certified mail, return receipt requested.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

12 th day of February, 20 1 4

.
# C_2019328EN.01005002.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Hugo’s Hotel v EUIPO — H'ugo's (HUGO’S BURGER Bar)

(Case T-397/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark HUGO’S BURGER Bar - Earlier EU word mark H’ugo’s - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 328/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hugo’s Hotel Ltd (St. Julians, Malta) (represented by: R. Sladden, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and J. Ivanauskas, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: H’ugo’s GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 May 2018 (Case R 1879/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between H’ugo’s and Hugo’s Hotel 2 May 2018 (Case R 1879/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between H’ugo’s and Hugo’s Hotel.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hugo’s Hotel Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hugo’s Hotel Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---