alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022119EN.01000301.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 January 2022 — European Commission v European Food SA and Others

(Case C-638/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Articles 107 and 108 TFEU - Bilateral Investment Treaty - Arbitration clause - Romania - Accession to the European Union - Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession - Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession - European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Competence of the Commission - Application ratione temporis of EU law - Determination of the date at which the right to receive aid is conferred on the beneficiary - Article 19 TEU - Articles 267 and 344 TFEU - Autonomy of EU law)

(2022/C 119/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Food SA, Starmill SRL, Multipack SRL, Scandic Distilleries SA, Ioan Micula (represented by: K. Struckmann, Rechtsanwalt, and G. Forwood, avocat, and by A. Kadri, Solicitor), Viorel Micula, European Drinks SA, Rieni Drinks SA, Transilvania General Import-Export SRL, West Leasing SRL, formerly West Leasing International SRL (represented by: J. Derenne, D. Vallindas and O. Popescu, avocats), Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agent, and subsequently by A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agent), Hungary

Interveners in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: D. Klebs, R. Kanitz and J. Möller, acting as Agents), Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, acting as Agent), Republic of Poland (represented by: D. Lutostańska, B. Majczyna and M. Rzotkiewicz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 18 June 2019, European Food and Others v Commission (T-624/15, T-694/15 and T-704/15, EU:T:2019:423); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 18 June 2019, European Food and Others v Commission (T-624/15, T-694/15 and T-704/15, EU:T:2019:423);

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the cross-appeal;

| 3. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to adjudicate on the pleas and arguments raised before it on which the Court of Justice of the European Union has not given a ruling; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to adjudicate on the pleas and arguments raised before it on which the Court of Justice of the European Union has not given a ruling;

| 4. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.

---
June 26, 1997

18725

#### County of Hawaii v. Iranon

Affirmed
# C_2021163EN.01000502.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 March 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Poste Italiane SpA (C-434/19), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione (C-435/19) v Riscossione Sicilia SpA agente riscossione per la provincia di Palermo e delle altre provincie siciliane (C-434/19), Poste Italiane SpA (C-435/19)

(Joined Cases C-434/19 and C-435/19) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Competition - Article 107(1) TFEU - Conditions under which applicable - Article 106(2) TFEU - Services of general economic interest - Management of the post-office account used for collection of the municipal real estate tax - Undertakings benefiting from special or exclusive rights granted by the Member States - Fees set unilaterally by the recipient undertaking - Abuse of dominant position - Article 102 TFEU - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 163/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Poste Italiane SpA (C-434/19), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione (C-435/19)

Defendants: Riscossione Sicilia SpA agente riscossione per la provincia di Palermo e delle altre provincie siciliane (C-434/19), Poste Italiane SpA (C-435/19)

Intervening party: Poste italiane SpA — Bancoposta (C-435/19)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 107 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a national measure under which the agents responsible for collecting the imposta comunale sugli immobiliare (municipal real estate tax) are required to hold a current account in their name with Poste Italiane SpA, to enable tax payers to pay that tax, and to pay a fee for the management of that current account, constitutes ‘State aid’ provided that that measure is (i) attributable to the State, (ii) provides a selective advantage to Poste Italiane through State resources and (iii) is liable to distort competition and trade between the Member States, which are matters for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
# C_2020161EN.01001101.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 — Credito Fondiario SpA v Single Resolution Board, Italian Republic, European Commission

(Case C-69/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Board (SRB) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Determination of the 2016 ex ante contribution - Action for annulment - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Late submission - Plea of illegality - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 161/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Credito Fondiario SpA (represented by: initially by F. Sciaudone, S. Frazzani, A. Neri and F. Iacovone, avvocati, and subsequently by F. Sciaudone, A. Neri and F. Iacovone, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, acting as Agent, and by S. Ianc, B. Meyring, T. Klupsch and S. Schelo, Rechtsanwälte, and by M. Caccialanza and A. Villani, avvocati), Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, assisted by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato), European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and K. P. Wojcik and A. Steiblytė, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Credito Fondiario SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Credito Fondiario SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.

---
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.7

                        ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST

BY THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ("Assignment") made and entered into
as of the 29th day of December 2000, AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT L.C., a Texas Limited
Liability Company.,("Assignor"), and 1st Realty Investments, Inc., a Nevada For
Profit Corporation, ("Assignee"), agree as follows:

         1. Assignment. For the amount of $10.00 evidenced by a note for that
amount from Assignee in favor of Assignor, together with other necessary and
agreed upon consideration as set forth below, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby irrevocably sells, transfers and
assigns to Assignee all of its membership interest and participation percentage
in Bosque del San Antonio L.L.C. Assignee hereby accepts the assignment and
transfer of the Assignors' membership interest in Bosque del San Antonio L.L.C.,
and agrees to assume any and all obligations and responsibilities associated
with such interest from and after the date of this Assignment and hold Assignors
harmless from any and all liabilities relating thereto.

         2. Further Acts: Additional Documents. Assignors and Assignee shall
perform all such further acts and execute and deliver any and all additional
documents and instruments that may be necessary or desirable to consummate,
evidence or confirm the assignment of the interest described herein.

         3. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Assignment has been executed as of the day and
year first above written.

                                        "ASSIGNORS"

                                        AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT, L.C. a Texas
                                        limited liability company


                                        /s/   Edward W. Dietrich
                                              ------------------
                                        Name  Edward W. Dietrich
                                              ------------------
                                        Title Vice President
                                              --------------

                                        "ASSIGNEE"

                                        1st Realty Investments, Inc. a Nevada
                                        For Profit Corporation

                                        /s/   William Szilagyi
                                              ----------------
                                        Name  William Szilagyi
                                              ----------------
                                        Title President
                                              ---------
# C_2019054EN.01003102.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/31

---

Action brought on 14 December 2018 — Dalasa v EUIPO — Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin (charantea)

(Case T-732/18)

(2019/C 54/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft Öffentlichen Rechts (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the mark at issue: Applicant

Mark at issue: Application for EU word mark charantea — Application for registration No 15 485 956

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2018 in Case R 539/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the action, alter the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 October 2018, R 539/2018-4 concerning opposition proceedings B 2 758 830 (EU trade mark application No 15 485 956), reject the opposition, and allow the EU trade mark application to proceed to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action, alter the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 October 2018, R 539/2018-4 concerning opposition proceedings B 2 758 830 (EU trade mark application No 15 485 956), reject the opposition, and allow the EU trade mark application to proceed to registration;

in the alternative,

| — | annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 October 2018, R 539/2018-4 concerning opposition proceedings B 2 758 830 (EU trade mark application No 15 485 956) and refer the case back to EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 October 2018, R 539/2018-4 concerning opposition proceedings B 2 758 830 (EU trade mark application No 15 485 956) and refer the case back to EUIPO;

| — | in any event, order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings; and

| — | order the opposing party to pay all of the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opposing party to pay all of the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-558, OMB Control No. 3235-0617]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 433

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 433 (17 CFR 230.433) governs the use and filing of free 
writing prospectuses under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et 
seq.). The purpose of Rule 433 is to reduce the restrictions on 
communications that an issuer can make to investors during a registered 
offering of its securities, while maintaining important investor 
protections. A free writing prospectus meeting the conditions of Rule 
433(d)(1) must be filed with the Commission and is publicly available. 
We estimate that it takes approximately 2.44764 hours per response to 
prepare a free writing prospectus and that approximately 20,179 
responses are filed per year for a total internal burden of 49,391 
hours (2.4476 hours per response x 20,179 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
by January 10, 2024 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) 
David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, or by sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b7b796a74664a42474944536b584e48054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="441416051b09252d28262b3c043721276a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 6, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27145 Filed 12-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
21426

#### State v. Salis

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 97 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2015 

Mr. CHAFFETZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform in the One Hundred 

Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

4 Government Reform (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $18,059,682 for the One 

9 Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 97 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,029,841 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2015, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2016; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,029,841 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2016, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2017. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2018301EN.01003802.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 July 2018 — Synergy Hellas v Commission

(Case T-244/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Grant agreement concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) - Recovery of the sums paid - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 301/51)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: d.d. Synergy Hellas Anonymi Empokiri Etaireia Parochis Ypiresion Pliroforikis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: K. Damis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Katsimerou and A. Kyratsou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2018) 1115 final of 19 February 2018 relating the recovery from the applicant of the sum of EUR 76 282,08 plus default interest.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
## NUM BER 13-23-00431-CV CO URT OF APPEALS T HIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CO RPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

K ATHERINE TIFFANY, Appellant,

v . M ELANIE VAN MAREN , Appellee.

O n appeal from a Justice Court, Precinct 1, Place 3 of Nueces County, Texas. 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva Appellant, Melanie Van Maren , attempted to appeal a judgment in cause n umber 20 EV

- 0211 -JP13. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final , appealable order. On October 12, 202 3 , t he Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within2 ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisd iction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court ’ s notice or otherwise cure this defect. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. id. R. 42.3(a), (c). CLARISSA SILVA Justice De livered and filed on the 25th day of

January , 20 2 4

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,230
<SECURITIES>                                       988
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                       536
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,633
<PP&E>                                           1,088<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,736<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,736
<SALES>                                         13,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,656
<CGS>                                            4,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,650)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
<FN>
<F1>PP&E IS NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF $4,952.
<F2>TOTAL ASSETS INCLUDE $306 OF OTHER ASSETS AND INVESTMENTS OF $1,437.
</FN>


</TABLE>