alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quaretly Report of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation.

December 30,
2008

By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER Christopher R. Gardner Chief Executive Officer


I,
Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Vitesse Semiconductor
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

December 30,
2008

By:

/s/ RICHARD C. YONKER Richard C. Yonker Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Certification

     I,  Michael  L.  Middleton,   President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of
Tri-County Financial Corporation, certify that:


1.   I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K of  Tri-County  Financial
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report;

3.   N/A;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure
     that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
     consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those
     entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  report is being
     prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and procedures as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
     materially  affect,  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All  significant  deficiencies  or  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: April 26, 2004

                                    /s/ Michael L. Middleton
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Michael L. Middleton
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification
President and Chief Executive Officer I, John J. Limbert, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB
Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):   19.




---



##### 



CSB BANCORP, INC.  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ John J. LimbertJohn J. LimbertPresident and
Chief Executive Officer   20.
1

Please note: These procedures may be revised as the situation develops.

PRE-COMPOST WINDROWS (PREP PILES)

Applicability: This method can be used after poultry have been euthanized to stabilize 

the carcasses while awaiting arrival of a composting subject matter expert to guide 

construction of the final windrows.

Description: This method, which increases the amount of carbon material mixed within 

the windrow core, involves forming two pre-compost windrows, capping them, and then 

forming one final windrow at a later time. This is especially useful when dealing with 

large amounts of carcass material relative to litter, creating a significant C:N imbalance, 

or when additional carbon material will increase porosity. Forming pre-compost 

windrows also stabilizes the tissue and begins a heating process until a single windrow 

can be constructed.

BUILDING PRE-COMPOST WINDROWS

 Move litter and carcasses from along 

sidewalls and the center of the house, 

forming two pre-compost windrows 

extending the length of the house (see 

top right photo). 

 Cap each windrow with 8–12 inches of 

suitable carbon material. 

BUILDING FINAL WINDROW FROM TWO 

PRE-COMPOST WINDROWS

 In the center of the house, construct a 

12–15 foot wide base that is 10–15

inches deep. 

 Combine both capped pre-compost 

windrows onto the base, mixing litter, 

carcasses, and added carbon material.

 Cap the final windrow with 8–12 inches of 

suitable carbon material (see bottom right

photo).

Final windrow (photo by Josh Payne)

FY2016 HPAI Response

Mortality Composting: 

Pre-Compost Windrows for 

Avian Influenza Infected Flocks

May 11, 2016

Pre-compost windrows (photo by Josh Payne)
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00232

- CR

KERRI ROEPEL

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 257

- C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kerri Roepel appealed her conviction for debit card abuse. She has now filed a

motion to dismiss her appeal, stating she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. The

motion is signed by both Roepel and her attorney.

Roepel’s motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeRoepel v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice G ray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

A ppeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 1 , 2018

Do not publish

[CR 25 ]
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 31.1Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationPresident and Chief Executive OfficerI, Eddie L. Steiner, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I, are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: May 12, 2006       /s/ Eddie L. Steiner         Eddie L. Steiner    President and    Chief Executive Officer  
21.
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]  

Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:35 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson;

Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Brown; Creevy, Jim; Dan

Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Peterson; Freeman,

Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Schoen; Jim

Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti; Maxine

Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski,

Raymond; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul;

Scott Beck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Patzner; Thomas

Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vijay Tendulkar; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo

Subject: Re: LV Transformer Call;

Dear Colleagues,

As requested, attached are the draft NIA results by efficiency level with both

ZDMH, and SA1 excluded from the analysis.

Thank you,

‐ Chris Bolduc

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Richard Parker <richardparkerdc@gmail.com>

wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,

>

> Attached hot off the press are the updated and revised LCC/PBB and NIA  

> results for low voltage transformers, DL 6‐8, with engineering  

> scatterplots included.  Please note that a new TSL (TSL 7) has been  

> added to reflect the NEMA premium EL. You will see that the TSL  

> numbering system is not listed in order of increasing stringency.

>

> See you on the call at 2:00 pm on Monday, Nov. 28.

>

> All best,

> RIchard Parker

> Facilitator

>

‐‐  

‐‐‐‐ 

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021
Cite as 2015 Ark. 127



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-1098 DEMETRIUS CURTIS APPELLANT V. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE Opinion Delivered March 19, 2015

PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO FILE A BELATED BRIEF [CHICOT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 09CV-14-72] HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM GIBSON, JUDGE APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION AND PETITION MOOT.

PER CURIAM On October 15, 2014, appellant Demetrius Curtis filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Chicot County Circuit Court where he was incarcerated. The circuit court denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Now before us are appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari and motion to file a belated brief. Because the public records of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) reflect that appellant is no longer incarcerated, it is clear that he could not prevail on appeal were we to permit the appeal to proceed. A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody. Branning v. Harmon , 2009 Ark. 533 (per curiam). Accordingly, we find that the motion and petition are moot. Thus, we do not reach the merits of the motion and petition and dismiss the appeal. Appeal dismissed; motion and petition moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1001 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 111
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1001

To establish authorization levels for general business loans for fiscal 
                          years 2015 and 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2015

  Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Peters, Mr. Gardner, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. 
Ayotte, Ms. Hirono, and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; which 
  was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 
                            Entrepreneurship

                             June 10, 2015

               Reported by Mr. Vitter, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish authorization levels for general business loans for fiscal 
                          years 2015 and 2016.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Lending 
Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. GENERAL BUSINESS LOANS AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (f); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Fiscal Year 2015.--For fiscal year 2015, the Administrator is 
authorized to make $20,500,000,000 in general business loans, as 
provided in section 7(a).
    ``(h) Fiscal Year 2016.--For fiscal year 2016, the Administrator is 
authorized to make $23,500,000,000 in general business loans, as 
provided in section 7(a).''.
                                                       Calendar No. 111

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1001

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To establish authorization levels for general business loans for fiscal 
                          years 2015 and 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 10, 2015

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                              EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2003


<S>                                                                <C>
Net income                                                         $136,392
                                                                   ========


Average shares outstanding                                          565,833

Basic earnings per share                                              $0.24
                                                                      =====


Average shares outstanding                                          565,833

Dilutive average shares outstanding under
  warrants and options                                              258,284

Exercise price                                                       $10.00

Assumed proceeds on exercise                                     $2,582,840

Average market value                                                 $11.63

Less:  Treasury stock purchased with assumed proceeds
       from exercise of warrants and options                        222,027

Adjusted average shares - diluted                                   602,090

Diluted earnings per share                                            $0.23
                                                                      =====
</TABLE>


     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  value  is  derived from trades with one broker.  Private sales may occur
where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50059

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELICIANO MORALES-BARCENAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-99-CR-568-1

--------------------

October 19, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Feliciano Morales-Barcenas appeals his sentence following

his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Morales-Barcenas

argues that his prior felony conviction was an element of the

offense of his conviction. Morales-Barcenas acknowledges that

his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for

Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.

Ct. 2348 (2000). 
No. 00-50059

-2-

Morales-Barcenas’s argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres, 523 U.S. at 235. 

AFFIRMED.
January 2020

There were 9 surveillance inspections conducted at 8 different sites for a total of 81 

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to decrease in response to colder 

air temperatures. Seven of the 8 sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and 

were scheduled for monthly sampling. One Category 2 (suspect) site was scheduled 

for biweekly sampling. No cages were confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

February 2019 50 0 20854

March 2019 115 0 20969

April 2019 108 0 21077

May 2019 92 0 21169

June 2019 123 0 21292

July 2019 123 0 21415

August 2019 96 0 21511

September 2019 101 0 21612

October 2019 90 0 21702

November 2019 93 0 21795

December 2019 91 0 21886

January 2020 81 0 21967
EXHIBIT 32.2
CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 32.2
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. LeeMiller, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
/s/ A. Lee MillerA. Lee MillerSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer 
*This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
49.