alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 10 QSB FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       9,877,908
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               210,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 48,535,356
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,033,830
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,060,366
<LOANS>                                    165,891,364
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,869,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             240,565,363
<DEPOSITS>                                 214,107,622
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,378,429
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,754,012
<LONG-TERM>                                    146,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,627,104
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,551,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              18,178,361
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,820,351
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,789,149
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               154,865
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,764,365
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,122,065
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,323,043
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,441,322
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  552,762
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (23,198)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,418,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,367,807
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,367,807
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,661,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,363,234
<LOANS-PAST>                                   107,178
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,467,702
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  265,632
<RECOVERIES>                                   114,934
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,869,766
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,869,766
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021471EN.01003501.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Tokin v Commission

(Case T-343/18) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price coordination throughout the EEA - Statement of objections - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Value of sales - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances)

(2021/C 471/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tokin Corp. (Sendai, Japan) (represented by: C. Thomas, lawyer, and T. Yuen, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, F. van Schaik and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, primarily, annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 1768 final of 21 March 2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40136 — Capacitors), in so far as that decision imposes fines on the applicant, and, in the alternative, a reduction in the amount of those fines.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tokin Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tokin Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
# C_2020027EN.01003201.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Soundio v EUIPO — Telefónica Germany (Vibble)

(Case T-665/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark Vibble - Earlier German word mark vybe - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 27/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Soundio A/S (Drammen, Norway) (represented by: N. Köster and J. Albers, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: P. Neuwald, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 September 2018 (Case R 721/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between E-Plus Mobilfunk GmbH and Soundio.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Soundio A/S to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Soundio A/S to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.

---
Exhibit 4.2


 





 


Specimen Name of
Company: Opera Limited Number: Ordinary Share(s): -[no. of shares]- Issued to: [name of shareholder] Dated Transferred from: OPERA
LIMITED Number Ordinary Share(s) -[no. of shares]- Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands Share capital is US$50,000
divided into 500,000,000 Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of shareholder] is the
registered holder of [no. of shares] Ordinary Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association
thereof. EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the day of 201[ ] by: DIRECTOR
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will hold five virtual listening sessions 

to receive public input on topics related to updates and improvements to the Chronic Wasting 

Disease (CWD) Herd Certification Program Standards. Section 603 of the Fiscal Year 2023 

Omnibus Appropriations Bill enacted the Chronic Wasting Disease Research and Management 

Act (H.R. 5608, the CWD Research and Management Act). Under the terms of the CWD 

Research and Management Act, APHIS must “solicit public feedback on potential updates and 

improvements” to the Chronic Wasting Disease Herd Certification Program Standards. Pursuant 

to the CWD Research and Management Act, APHIS is publishing this notice soliciting public 

feedback on potential updates and improvements to the CWD Program Standards. Specifically, 

we are scheduling a series of virtual listening sessions to gather information that will help us in 

evaluating and potentially amending the Program Standards consistent with the CWD Research 

and Management Act. The deadline to register to speak at the fifth listening session is September 

7, 2023. You may provide written comments at the meetings by using the meeting chat function 

or file written comments before, during, or after the meetings by emailing CWD@usda.gov or 

mailing to Dr. Hillary A. McManama, Veterinary Medical Officer, Cervid Health Staff, Strategy 

and Policy, Veterinary Services, APHIS; c/o Ms. Melanie Rouse, 4700 River Road Unit 43, 

Riverdale, MD 20737. Written comments by attendees or other interested stakeholders will be 

welcomed for the public record up to close of business on Monday, November 13, 2023. Please 

refer to Docket No. APHIS-2023-0042 when submitting your comments.

Topics for input will include:

• indemnity approach including role of indemnity herd management using predictive 

genetics

• use of predictive genetics to prevent CWD within HCP herds

Specific questions we are seeking input on:

• Should APHIS provide indemnity only for positive and suspect animals and highly 

susceptible exposed animals based on predictive genetics scores rather than doing whole 

herd depopulations for white tailed deer and other species as genetic susceptibility testing 

becomes available for them?

Instructions and expectations for speakers during the call:

-The listening session will be recorded.

-You must have indicated on the registration form that you wish to speak during the 

listening session. A predetermined order will be followed for those that indicated they 

wish to speak during the session. The facilitator will call on you when it is your turn to 

speak.

-Please introduce yourself by name and affiliation at the start of your comments.

-Comments will be limited to a maximum of 3 to 5 minutes depending on the number of 

requests to speak. The facilitator will let you know before the call how long the 

comments can be and let you know when you have 30 seconds left.

-Keep the discussion focused on the meeting topics and respectful.

-Focus on interests, not on positions.

-Be specific—Use examples.

-Refrain from using profanity or distracting the group.
INTERSTATE MOVEMENT OF WILD CERVIDS BETWEEN

(State of origin)________________ AND (Receiving State) __________________ 

The purpose of this document is to indicate the review and agreement by the State of origin ________________, 

the receiving State _______________, and their respective state agencies having authority for wild cervids; and 

the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), in accordance with the Chronic Wasting 

Disease (CWD) rule - 9 CFR Part 81.3(b), that the summary statement and supporting documentation provided 

by (State of origin) _______________, from which wild cervids will be obtained for this interstate movement, 

are from a source population documented to be low risk to CWD based on the information provided. 

Further, and as applicable, that the wild cervids to be translocated either (check appropriate box):

□ Meet the bovine tuberculosis testing requirements for interstate movement of captive/ wild cervids in

accordance with 9 CFR Parts 77.20 and 77.27, OR

□ The States have requested and received from APHIS a waiver of the bovine tuberculosis testing requirements

for interstate movement of the captive /wild cervids in accordance with 9 CFR Part 77.38. 

In addition, each of the cervids captured from this wild population for interstate movement and release must 

have two forms of animal identification, one of which is USDA official animal identification, in accordance 

with 9 CFR Part 81.3(b). 

STATE of ORIGIN/ AGENCY: 

SIGNATURE: ____________________________ DATE: _________ 

NAME/TITLE: ___________________________State Veterinarian

STATE of ORIGIN/ AGENCY: 

SIGNATURE: ____________________________ DATE: _________ 

NAME/TITLE: ___________________________Wildlife Veterinarian

RECEIVING STATE/AGENCY: 

SIGNATURE: ____________________________ DATE: _________ 

NAME/ TITLE: ___________________________State Veterinarian

RECEIVING STATE/AGENCY: 

SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE: _________ 

NAME/ TITLE: __________________________Wildlife Veterinarian

DATE: _________ 

USDA APHIS VETERINARY SERVICES

SIGNATURE: __________________________ 

NAME/TITLE: 

Cc: VS – ADD, ____________________ 

Cc: VS – ADD, ____________________ 

Safeguarding American Agriculture March 2015
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-Q  for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully
complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.

This 3rd day of November, 2005.

/s/ R. Daniel Blanton
---------------------
R. Daniel Blanton
President &
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)

 /s/ Ronald L. Thigpen
----------------------
Ronald L. Thigpen
Executive Vice President &
Chief Operating Officer
(Principal financial officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insurance Auto
Auctions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas C. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 6, 2005

                                      /s/ Thomas C. O'Brien
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Thomas C. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer

      This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020036EN.01002902.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Refan Bulgaria v EUIPO (Shape of a flower)

(Case T-747/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a flower - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons)

(2020/C 36/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Refan Bulgaria OOD (Trud, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2018 (Case R 2518/2017-1), regarding an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a flower as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Refan Bulgaria OOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Refan Bulgaria OOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
#### American Security Company, a Corporation, *Appel*lant, v. Samuel S. Goldsberry, *Appellee.*

ON REHEARING.

1. Expense incurred in obtaining an abstract of the title to mortgaged property from the date of the mortgage to the beginning of a foreclosure proceeding to enforce the lien *124of the mortgage is a proper item of expense to be allowed the mortgagee or his assigns in such proceeding where the mortgage provides for the payment of attorneys fees and all expenses the mortgagee may reasonably incur or pay because of the failure of the mortgagor or his assigns to comply with the agreements and covenants contained in the mortgage.

2. In appellate proceedings the burden is upon the appellant to make the error apparent, the presumption being in favor of the Chancellor’s decree.

Rehearing denied.

*Gibbons, Mawwell, McGarry*& *Daniel,*for motion.

Ellis, J.

Appellant filed a petition for a rehearing on the ground that this court overlooked the fact that the bill of complaint did not allege any expense incurred by the complainant for obtaining an abstract of the title to the mortgaged property, nor for attorney’s fees. The mortgage which was attached to the bill of complaint and made part of it, provided for 'the payment of attorney’s fees and all expenses the mortgagee “may reasonably incur or pay because of the failure of the mortgagor or his assigns to comply with the agreements, covenants” etc. of the promissory note. The record does not disclose that the bill for the abstract did not relate to the property. It was the duty of appellant to make the error apparent. The presumption obtains in favor of the correctness of the Chancellor’s decree.

The application for rehearing is denied.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur.
# C_2018072EN.01004401.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/44

---

Action brought on 9 January 2018 — Holzer y Cia v EUIPO — Annco (AT ANN TAYLOR)

(Case T-4/18)

(2018/C 072/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Holzer y Cia, SA de CV (Mexico city, Mexico) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Annco, Inc. (New York, New York, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘AT ANN TAYLOR’ — EU trade mark No 11 197 647

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2017 in Case R 2371/2016-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | admit the action; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit the action;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | confirm the validity of the registration of the EUTM No 11 197 647 ‘AT ANN TAYLOR’ for all the products for which the said application sought protection; |
| --- | --- |

—

confirm the validity of the registration of the EUTM No 11 197 647 ‘AT ANN TAYLOR’ for all the products for which the said application sought protection;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs of the procedure.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in his analysis regarding: the existence of confusing similarity between the conflicting signs and the knowledge of the proprietor of a confusingly similar trademark when filing its application; the intentions of the proprietor at the time of filing its trademark; the probative value given to the evidences submitted by the cancellation applicant and the burden of proof. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in his analysis regarding: the existence of confusing similarity between the conflicting signs and the knowledge of the proprietor of a confusingly similar trademark when filing its application; the intentions of the proprietor at the time of filing its trademark; the probative value given to the evidences submitted by the cancellation applicant and the burden of proof.

---
27999

#### State v. English

Affirmed
# C_2018104EN.01004401.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/44

---

Action brought on 19 January 2018 — Delfant Hoylaerts v Commission

(Case T-17/18)

(2018/C 104/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Isabelle Delfant Hoylaerts (Montredon-des-Corbières, France) (represented by: E. Conquet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s Rejection Decision of 21 March 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s Rejection Decision of 21 March 2017;

| — | annul the Commission’s implicit Rejection Decision of 20 October 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s implicit Rejection Decision of 20 October 2017;

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs relating to the medico-educational institution from 20 October 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs relating to the medico-educational institution from 20 October 2017;

| — | order the Commission to pay to Ms Delfant Hoylaerts EUR 3 000 in damages as compensation for the financial and non-material losses suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay to Ms Delfant Hoylaerts EUR 3 000 in damages as compensation for the financial and non-material losses suffered;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs and to pay to Ms Delfant Hoylaerts EUR 3 000 in respect of non-recoverable expenses. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs and to pay to Ms Delfant Hoylaerts EUR 3 000 in respect of non-recoverable expenses.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 72 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, the provisions of which have been adopted by the joint rules on sickness insurance for officials of the European Union, in particular Article 20, and by the Guide to Commission assistance for disabled children of staff entitled under the Staff Regulations.

According to the applicant, the Commission infringed the above provisions by adopting the decision to refuse to bear costs relating to a medico-educational institution (‘MEI’) for her disabled child. In that respect, she submits that that decision is based on a purely administrative misunderstanding and that the legal basis relied on by the Commission is lacking.

Finally, the applicant claims that the unfair conduct on the part of the Commission has serious consequences in that the Commission is incapable of taking sole responsibility for the costs of the MEI where the MEI is essential for her child. Thus, her psychological and financial circumstances have been exacerbated by the fault on the Commission’s part.

---