alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 4:59 PM

To: roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov; Richard Ta kaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov)

Cc: steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov; stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov;

joanna.seto@doh.hawaii.gov; Lovgren, Andrew C LT NAVSUP, 700; Shimabuku, June T. CIV

NAVFAC HI, EV4; Nakamura, Pe ter M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1; Ts utsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC

HI, OPHE3; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, Bob

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - September 16, 2014

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of September 16, 2014. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will

be annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan

Action complete.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1

‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

Action complete.

b. Action 2

‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP

‐ 8 free product is unknown. Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP

‐ 8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.

No change.

c. Action 3

‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP

‐ 8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

No change.

d. Action 4

‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

d.(1) Sentinel Wells

Navy contractors continued drilling operations to install two new groundwater monitoring wells north of the Red Hill

Bulk Fuel Storage Facility.

d.(2) Site Characterization2 The Navy is awaiting DOH/EPA written comments on the Draft Work Plan/ Sampling and Analysis Plan for Tank 5 Area

Characterization of July 2014.

d.(3) AOC/SOW

No change.

d.(4) Request for Additional Information

The Navy continued to provide to the DOH and EPA via email the specific Red Hill information requested in DOH email of

August 1, 2014.

d.(5) Weekly Telephone Conference Calls

The telephone conference call scheduled for September 12, 2014 was cancelled by EPA. The next telephone conference

call will be held on September 19, 2014.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Vr,

Aaron
#### Dorette BROWNLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOSPIRA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-2005

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 2017

Decided July 26, 2017

*510Dorette Brownlee, Waukegan, IL, Pro Se.

Laura A. Lindner, Attorney, Littler Mendelson P.C., Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before POSNER, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendant, her former employer, charging that discharging her had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The parties agreed in writing to settle the litigation rather than litigate to judgment, but their agreement provided that there would be “[n]o binding agreement until the typed settlement agreement is signed” — which it never was. The plaintiffs lawyer did negotiate a proposed settlement agreement with the defendant’s lawyer, but the written terms made clear that this was not the “binding agreement” to which the parties had referred. Nevertheless the district judge treated it as such, ruling that the litigation had been ended by a settlement and by so ruling precipitating this appeal by the plaintiff.

The parties had agreed in writing however that there would be no binding agreement until the typed settlement agreement was signed, and it never was by either the plaintiff or her lawyer. There was therefore no agreement that bound the plaintiff, whose appeal asks us to vacate the district court’s decision on the ground that there was no settlement terminating the litigation. We therefore vacate the decision of the district court and remand for further proceedings in that court; since we have determined that there has been no settlement, the case remains open in the district court.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated April 16, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows included
in the Annual Report of Milestone Scientific, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
Milestone Scientific, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (SEC File No.
333-39784), effective December 21, 2000.


GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
April 12, 2002
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Eugene Goodson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|/s/R. EUGENE GOODSONR. Eugene Goodson
Chief Executive Officer
Williams Controls, Inc
December 20, 2002 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AS
OF 12/31/199 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,391
<SECURITIES>                                    16,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (9,594)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,350
<PP&E>                                          14,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,403)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,338
<BONDS>                                        124,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           237
<OTHER-SE>                                     (70,140)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,563
<SALES>                                        870,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               874,747
<CGS>                                          823,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41,448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,110)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  42,418
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (600)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,924)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 UnitedStates Code

 

The undersigned, being the PrincipalFinancial Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), herebycertifies that the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2004, filed with the United States Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledgingor otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: May 4, 2004

 

 
| */s/*  | *Mark A. Maki*                                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Mark A. Maki                                              |
|   | Vice  President, Finance and  Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
Reinstated and Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum

Opinion filed February 13 , 2014.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 01050

- CV

IN RE LISA LUXENBURG , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 29603



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 22, 2013, relator Lisa Luxenburg filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Ken Wise, the former p residing judge of the 334th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside his October 7, 2013 order granting the motion to abate the proceeding and compel arbitration filed by real party in interest J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc

.2

Judge Wise, however, is no longer presiding judge of the 334 th District
Court because he is now serving as a justice on this Court

. T herefore, Judge Wise’s successor, the Honorable Grant Dorfman, is now the respondent. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(a). We abated this original proceeding to allow Judge Dorfman to reconsider the October 7, 2013 order. See id. 7.2(b). Judge Dorfman has

recon sidered the original decision and has signed an order granting J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. ’s motion to abate the proceeding and compel arbitration

. After considering the merits of relator’s petition, we conclude that r elator
has not established her entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsis ts of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.
#### DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant, v. Mildred R. STAMP, Appellee.

No. 17301.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 11, 1963.

Decided Sept. 12, 1963.

Mr. Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Hyman Smollar, Washington, D. C. , with whom Messrs. Richard A. Mehler and Charles P. Hovis, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Magruder, Senior Circuit Judge for the First Circuit,* and Washington, Circuit Judge.

*

 Sitting by designation pursuant to Title 28 U.S.Code § 294(d).

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellee fell on an icy sidewalk in downtown Washington, in March of 1960, and was seriously injured. She sued the District of Columbia, and obtained a judgment. On appeal, the District makes no criticism of the instructions given to the jury, but complains chiefly that the evidence was insufficient to establish actual or constructive notice to the District of the existence of a dangerous condition at the location where appellee fell. We disagree. In our view, the evidence was enough to take the ease to the jury, under our decisions in Smith v. District of Columbia, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 189 F.2d 671 (1951), and Campbell v. District of Columbia, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 243 F.2d 226 (1957).

Affirmed.
# C_2020161EN.01001001.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — X-GmbH v Finanzamt Z

(Case C-48/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 132(1)(c) - Exemptions - Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions - Telephone services - Services provided by nurses and medical assistants)

(2020/C 161/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X-GmbH

Defendant: Finanzamt Z

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 132(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that services provided by telephone, consisting of advice relating to health and illness, can fall within the exemption provided for in that provision, provided that they pursue a therapeutic aim, which it is for the referring court to determine. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 132(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that services provided by telephone, consisting of advice relating to health and illness, can fall within the exemption provided for in that provision, provided that they pursue a therapeutic aim, which it is for the referring court to determine.

| 2. | Article 132(1)(c) of Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted as not requiring that, due to the fact that medical services are provided by telephone, nurses and medical assistants who provide those services are subject to additional professional qualification requirements in order for those services to benefit from the exemption provided for in that provision, provided that they can be regarded as being of a level of quality equivalent to that of services provided by other service providers using the same means of communication, which is a matter for the referring court to determine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 132(1)(c) of Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted as not requiring that, due to the fact that medical services are provided by telephone, nurses and medical assistants who provide those services are subject to additional professional qualification requirements in order for those services to benefit from the exemption provided for in that provision, provided that they can be regarded as being of a level of quality equivalent to that of services provided by other service providers using the same means of communication, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 555 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 555

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2015.
    Resolved, That the following named member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on the Budget: Mr. Renacci.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 939 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that access to digital 

communications tools and connectivity is necessary to prepare youth 

in the United States to compete in the 21st century economy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2016 

Mr. WELCH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

access to digital communications tools and connectivity 

is necessary to prepare youth in the United States to 

compete in the 21st century economy. 

Whereas the United States should lead the world in providing 

high-quality education and opportunities to its citizens; 

Whereas digital skills are essential for education and preparing citizens for the economy of the future; 

Whereas, on a daily basis, teachers across the country assign 

homework that requires Internet access to be completed; 

Whereas there are 5,000,000 households with school-age children in the United States that do not have high-speed 

Internet access at home and fall into what is known as 

the ‘‘homework gap’’; 


rfrederick on DSK30MX082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 939 IH 

Whereas a disproportionate number of students without highspeed Internet access at home reside in low-income and 

minority households; 

Whereas students and families in rural areas face additional 

challenges when homework requires Internet access that 

is out of reach; 

Whereas every student deserves an opportunity at 21st century success; 

Whereas participation in the classroom can be improved when 

all students are equipped with the tools to complete their 

homework; 

Whereas educators can increase the use of cutting-edge education technology and digital learning resources when 

those resources remain accessible during out-of-school 

hours; 

Whereas data show that students have received lower grades 

and been unable to complete their assignments because of 

their lack of Internet access at home; 

Whereas improved student access to postsecondary education 

and workforce opportunities can be made possible by increasing the ability of students to apply for employment, 

postsecondary education, and financial aid opportunities; 

Whereas leaders in the public and private sectors have recognized that the homework gap is an issue of national importance and partnered to find cooperative solutions to 

address it; and 

Whereas instilling digital skills and the knowledge to succeed 

in the 21st century economy in the Nation’s students is 

vital to the Nation’s global competitiveness: Now, therefore, be it 


rfrederick on DSK30MX082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 939 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that access to digital communications tools 

3 and connectivity is necessary to prepare youth in the 

4 United States to compete in the 21st century economy. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK30MX082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          37,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,100
<PP&E>                                       1,572,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 277,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,387,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,300
<BONDS>                                        784,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     567,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,387,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.0

                Statement re: Computation of per share earnings

Reconciliations of net income per share and net income per share, assuming
dilution computations for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000 are as
follows (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

                                  Three Months Ended

                                                               March 31,
                                                          ------------------
                                                            2001      2000
                                                          -------    -------
Numerator:

Net loss-numerator for basic and
  diluted net income (loss) per share...............      $(2,851)  $(1,040)
                                                          =======   =======
Denominator:
  Denominator for basic income (loss) per
    common share weighted average shares............       28,354    26,992

Effect of dilutive securities-stock option..........           --        --
                                                          -------   -------
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per
  common share......................................       28,354    26,992
                                                          =======   =======
Potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the computation in loss periods,
as their effect would be antidilutive.