alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jimmy S.M. Lee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. as of and for the periods presented in such Report on Form 10-K.



By:

/s/    JIMMY S.M. LEEJimmy S.M. LeeChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 4, 2003




I, Gary L.
Fischer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended September 30, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. as of and for the periods presented in such Report on Form 10-K.



By:

/s/    GARY L. FISCHERGary L. FischerPresident, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDecember 4, 2003
#### Chun v. Tanaka

17060

11/29/94

Affirmed
# C_2019103EN.01004002.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — Marry Me Group v EUIPO (MARRY ME)

(Case T-332/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark MARRY ME - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 103/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Marry Me Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Theado, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 March 2018 (Case R 806/2017-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MARRY ME as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Marry Me Group AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Marry Me Group AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27430]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Background Investigator Quality Control Survey

AGENCY: USAID.

ACTION: Availability of survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Quality control survey to allow the USAID Office of Security 
Field Investigations program to obtain feedback on its background 
investigator workforce from members of the general public who are 
interviewed by USAID background investigators.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

ADDRESSES: USAID, SEC/FI, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20523.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Shemonsky, (202) 712-1734, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USAID currently conducts this quality 
control process via U.S. Mail and telephone calls. The agency is 
seeking to both modernize and simplify this process.

Brian Shemonsky,
Background Investigations Program Manager.
[FR Doc. 2023-27430 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
```
#### Lincoln v. Oku

16843

9/01/94

Affirmed
----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Clayton W. Williams |
|-------------------------|
| Clayton W. Williams     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 9, 2011             |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Michael L. Pollard  |
| Michael L. Pollard      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 9, 2011             |
<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Ibis Technology Corporation

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ibis Technology Corporation:

      The audits referred to in our report dated February 12, 1999, included the
related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, included in the annual report on Form 10-K.The
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statement schedule based on our audits.In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.333-1174) on Form S-1, (No.33-78440) on Form S-3, (No. 333-9237) on Form
S-3, (No. 333-9239) on Form S-8, (No.33-81452) on Form S-8, and (No. 333-45247)
on Form S-8 of Ibis Technology Corporation of our report dated February 12,
1999, relating to the balance sheets of Ibis Technology Corporation as of
December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ending December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
annual report on 10-K of Ibis Technology Corporation.


                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1999
**WORK PLAN FOR THE AQUATIC ANIMALS COMMISSION**

**Items proposed for adoption at the May GS 2022**

**On-going work for adoption in 2023 or later**

**Newly prioritised items to commence before May 2024**
Safeguarding American Agriculture 

Federal Relay Service 

APHIS is an agency of USDA’s Marketing and Regulatory Programs (Voice/TTY/ASCII/Spanish)

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 1-800-877-8339 

May 21, 2012 

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 12-11 

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants 

 Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

 Veterinary Services Leadership Team 

 

FROM: Richard E. Hill, Jr. /s/ Richard E. Hill, Jr. 

 Director 

 Center for Veterinary Biologics 

SUBJECT: Virulent Systemic Feline Calicivirus Label Claims

I. PURPOSE 

The purpose of this notice is to clarify the Center for Veterinary Biologics’ (CVB) policy 

regarding label claims implying protection against Virulent Systemic Feline Calicivirus 

(VS FCV), and the data required to support those claims. 

II. BACKGROUND 

In general, outbreaks of VS FCV are rare and have been self-limiting. The isolate from 

each outbreak appears genetically unique and seems to have appeared spontaneously, by 

mutation from caliciviruses already present in the affected cats (Vet Clin Small Anim

38:775-786). The expected degree of cross-protection against other virulent isolate(s) is 

unknown. 

III. POLICY 

The CVB has determined that label claims associated with VS FCV should be consistent 

with the studies conducted. Brief study summaries may be included on label inserts, final 

container labels, or final carton labels, but this is not required. Using a heterologous 

challenge strain is strongly recommended when conducting efficacy studies to support 

label claims associated with VS FCV. If the vaccination/challenge study is conducted 

with a strain homologous to a strain included in the vaccine strain, additional work 

should be done to assess serologic neutralizing activity against multiple VS FCV strains. 

Submitting a protocol for review prior to conducting these studies is strongly 

recommended. 

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture 

Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection 

Service 

Veterinary Services 

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics 

1920 Dayton Avenue 

PO Box 844 

 Ames, IA 50010 

(515) 337- 6100 
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 12-11 

Page 2 

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY 

This policy will be effective immediately. It is expected that all labeling materials with 

claims associated with VS FCV will comply with this policy within 6 months of the date 

of this Notice.
#### State v. Keanini

18111

5/18/95

Affirmed
# C_2019255EN.01001601.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/16

---

Appeal brought on 21 December 2018 by OY against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 16 October 2018 in Case T-605/16: OY v Commission

(Case C-816/18 P)

(2019/C 255/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: OY (represented by: S. Rodrigues and N. Flandin, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 12 June 2019 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 745 

Congratulating Einstein Healthcare Network on their 150th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2016 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. MACARTHUR, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. NORCROSS, Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, and Mr. 

BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Einstein Healthcare Network on their 150th 

anniversary. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Einstein Healthcare Network 

3 on their 150th anniversary and recognizes the sig4 nificance of this milestone; and 

5 (2) commends Einstein Healthcare Network for 

6 their high-quality medical care services to the people 

7 of Philadelphia and the surrounding region. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

            I, Rick J. O'Brien, Chief Financial Officer of Home Solutions ofAmerica, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, herebycertify that (i) the Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in thatreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presentedtherein. 

 

| Date: April 29, 2004 | /s/RICK J. O'BRIEN               |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | RickJ. O'Brien                                                                                         |
|                 | ChiefFinancial Officer                     |
#### Shryock *et al. versus*McClure.

•This was an action on a promissory note, brought by Samuel T. Shryock and John P. Rhoads, assignees of the Farmers’ and Mechanics’ Bank of Shippensburg, against William McClure. The facts in regard to the assignment to the plaintiffs are the same as in Shryock *v.*Basehore, above reported. The defendant requested the court to charge that the plaintiffs could not recover because the deed of assignment to them was void as “ being transgressive of Bankrupt Act.” The court so charged and directed a verdict for the defendant, which charge was assigned for error. The case was argued most learnedly by the same counsel as appeared in the last case (and on the same day) for the plaintiffs in error.

*J. McD. Sharpe, T. B. Kennedy*and *John Stewart,*for defendant in error,

did not present a paper-book.

Paxson, J. —

What has been said in Shryock *et al. v.*Basehore, renders any discussion of this case unnecessary.

The judgment is reversed and a *venire facias de novo*awarded.
H. Res. 876 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 21, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 5461) to require the Secretary of the Treasury to submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees on 

the estimated total assets under direct or indirect control by 

certain senior Iranian leaders and other figures, and for other 

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in 

order except those printed in the report of the Committee on 
2 

•HRES 876 EH 

Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment 

may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 

be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall 

be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 

points of order against such amendments are waived. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
How to Use Digital Photos for VSPS:

• Uploaded images must be JPEG, GIF or PNG format, and must be under 1MB. 

• Images will always be resized to 640x480 pixels so the lowest resolution setting on a digital 

camera should be sufficient. 

• Camera phones may not have sufficient resolution and clarity. 

• Fill the frame 90% with the horse and without people in the picture. 

• Separate the legs to show white marks. 

• When possible, always have your back to the sun. 

• Inside of barns and sale barns may require additional light on the horse. Consider moving the 

horse to better lighting conditions if possible. 

• Halters and / or lead ropes are great but no other tack should be visible. 

• Consider viewing the pictures while you are still at the client site. 

• If you are taking pictures of many horses, consider taking the first picture of the horse’s call 

name on the halter, stall door or other location where the name may be displayed - it will help 

you sort and save them on your computer. 

• You may want to have pictures of the horse in both their summer and winter look. 

• VSPS offers an override function to an existing picture in case of mistakes or horses that 

change color with age. 

• If the horse has no marks and clean tips but has hair whorls or signalments important to its 

unique physical description, you may want close ups of that particular area.
#### Lynn D. PAUL and Anita K. Paul, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Mable S. KITT, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 13968.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 24, 1975.

Weston L. Bayles, Salt Lake City, for defendant-appellant.

Gregory C. Diamond and George C. Morris, of Morris & Robinson, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs-respondents.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a specific performance judgment under a contract to purchase a *887lot. Affirmed, except as to award of attorney’s fees. No costs awarded.

The contract dated April 1, 1972, subject of this suit, called for down and monthly payments, all the latter of which timely were paid for two years, save for two: November and December, 1973, — which were paid respectively two and one months later in January, 1974. The March, 1975 payment was forwarded late, but within the grace period of the contract, and was addressed to the correct street number, but to “Sandy,” a suburban town adjacent to Salt Lake City, but not to “Salt Lake City,” — and due to postal delay, was not received on time by Mrs. Kitt, the seller, who promptly, early in April, wrote the plaintiffs, saying, “I hereby notify you of the termination of your contract.” Thereupon plaintiffs and their counsel sent money orders to make up the deficiencies, (which Mrs. Kitt refused to accept and returned) and offered to pay Mrs. Kitt the balance due under the contract in exchange for a deed. Such exchange was never consummated, and this action followed.

Defendant gave notice of default, but not under the terms of the contract, that required seller to give the buyers five days to remedy the default. Furthermore, it would appear that save for a postal delay, the buyers had sent payment within the grace period, and the defendant, by accepting a couple of late payments before, under the authorities, could not have required strict performance without having given the buyers fair warning to that effect. There was no evidence to indicate that the parties by phone or personal contact, made any attempt to iron out what appears to have been relatively minor problems.

The trial court made Findings, decreed specific performance, and awarded $500 attorney’s fees. Mrs. Kitt questioned the fee award. However, Paul testified he hired counsel and promised to pay $500 for the services. Mrs. Kitt did not cross-examine.

We believe and hold that in this equity case, where both sides were participants to the initiation of this litigation, and under the other circumstances, each should have borne its own attorneys’ fees and the judgment is ordered modified to vacate the award of attorney’s fees.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.
# C_2020279EN.01000901.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-116/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) - Reassignment - Legal basis - Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Interests of the service - Substantial changes in tasks - Qualification - Transfer - Change - Misuse of power - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Right to a fair hearing - Right to effective judicial protection - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

(2020/C 279/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Gregor Schneider (represented by: H. Tettenborn, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gregor Schneider to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gregor Schneider to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Explorers' Portage
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

Trappers carry a birch-bark canoe across a rapids in a stream.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe