alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 27, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01293-CV

VERONICA JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DALLAS, TX HIDDEN RIDGE,

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05397-B

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal has not been filed because appellant has not requested 

it. By letter dated January 11, 2019, we directed appellant to file, within ten days, written 

verification she had requested the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply could 

result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). 

To date, however, appellant has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted 

without the reporter’s record. See id.

As the clerk’s record has been filed, we further ORDER appellant to file her opening 

brief no later than April 26, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 7, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 132 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-99, CP2024-102.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-27410 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2020103EN.01001801.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-163/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality)

(2020/C 103/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gabriel Amisi Kumba (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
# C_2020414EN.01002604.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

(Case C-944/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/42)

Language of the case: Latvian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby
certifies that the Partnerships Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 (the Amendment), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Maki                                                                                                            
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Mark A. Maki
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (as delegate of the General Partner)
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

December 27, 2012

The Honorable Robert M. Summers

Secretary

, Maryland Department of the Enviro nment

1 8 00 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore

, M aryland 2 1230

Dear Secretary Summers :

On November 19

, 201 2

, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) . This SIP revision (#12

- 07) to the SIP

pertain s to adoption under COMAR 26.11.04 through prospective incorporati on by reference the

national ambient air quality standards ( NAAQS ) to ensure Maryland ’ s ambient air quality

standards are identical to the fed eral standards at all times and pertains to repeal of existing

provisions, namely, Regulations .02 and .04

— .09 related to the NAAQS

. EPA has determined

that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, an d is reviewing it to prepare a

Notic e of Proposed Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to M r

. Christopher

Cripps , Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814

- 2 179

. H e is the principal contact for this

rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

D i a na Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

c c: George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director

, Air and Radiation Management Administration

Diane Franks, Manager

, Air Quality Planning ProgramCustomer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474

H: \ CCRIPPS \

MD NAAQS IBR as amended \ Completeness Letter MD NAAQS IBR

MD248.docx

CONCURRENCES

SYMBOL  3AP30 3AP30 3AP00

SURNAME  Cripps Mastro Esher

DATE 

EPA Form 1320

- 1 (12

- 70) OFFICIAL FILE COPY
# C_2021228EN.01000401.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-537/19) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/18/EC - Public works contracts - Contract between a public body and a private undertaking for the lease of building not yet constructed - Article 1 - Realisation of a work corresponding to requirements specified by the tenant - Article 16 - Precluded)

(2021/C 228/05)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek, M. Noll-Ehlers and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented: initially by M. Fruhmann, and subsequently by J. Schmoll, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.

---
#### Vincent A. SHEEHY III, et al., Appellants, v. Edwin H. ESTES, Appellee.

No. 20504.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1963.

William M. Acker, Jr., Kenneth R. Cain, Birmingham, Ala., W. Bruce White, Birmingham, Ala. (Smyer, White, Reid & Acker, Markstein & Cain, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for appellants.

Leigh M. Clark, Lucien D. Gardner, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., James F. Hinton, Jack W. Torbert, Gadsden, Ala. (Cabaniss *&*Johnston, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In deciding the plaintiffs’ claim in an action where jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, the district court severed a counterclaim for future disposition, and thereafter entered a judgment, from which this appeal stems, against the appellants. Some of the specifications of error raise questions of Alabama law which we think were properly decided by the district court. The other contentions of the appellants present procedural questions, and as to these we conclude that no error is apparent and no prejudice is shown. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
April 9, 1998

20812

#### Abastillas v. Kekona

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                          2,814,332
<SECURITIES>                   10,947,480
<RECEIVABLES>                   5,426,985
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,958,339
<INVENTORY>                     3,009,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               21,106,163
<PP&E>                          3,138,240
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,892,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 23,367,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,353,474
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           57,677
<OTHER-SE>                     18,933,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   23,367,413
<SALES>                         5,563,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,563,216
<CGS>                           2,758,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,392,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 16,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (487,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                      208,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (279,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.05)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

NICHOLAS ERMOLOVICH,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2975 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 63 DB 2023

Attorney Registration No. 73573

(Lancaster County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of June, 2023, having received no response to a

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Nicholas Ermolovich is placed on temporary 

suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He shall comply 

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to 

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order are specifically 

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline. See Pa.R.D.E. 402(c)(3) 

(providing an exception to the confidentiality requirement of Rule 402 when “an order of 

temporary suspension from the practice of law is entered by the Court pursuant to 

Enforcement Rule 208(f)”).
### SI()-l()03()4-()4 2



# WBIU C 

# Gras s AJrpQr

t LEXINGTON-FAYETT EURBA NCOUNT YAIRPOR TBOAR D

Februar y24,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S , Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea rMr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o expres s m ysuppor t fo rth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t immunit yan d propose d join t busines s agreemen t file d b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo rth e oneworl d allianc e t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta ran d SkyTea m alliances . Thi s increase d allianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o fth e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y- firs t b ysolidifyin g U.S . - Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo rfurthe rliberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte ra thoroug h review , I encourag e th e Departmen t o fTransportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai r transportatio n services . Approva l fo rAA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e 3 positiv e impac t o n ai rtrave l b yofferin g customer s mor e service , scheduling , an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensur e tha t customer s continu e t o benefi t fro m th e competitio n afforde d b ythre e competitiv e ai ralliances . I urg e yo u t o quickl yapprov e thi s application . Sincerely , Eri cJ . FrankI , A.A.E . Executiv e Directo r Blu e Gras s Airpor t 400 0 Termina l Drive , Suit e 20 6 Lexington , K

Y4051 0 

### (859 ) 425-310 0 efrankl<a)bluegrassairport.co m

400 0 Termina l Driv e • Suit e 206 • Lexington , Kentuck

y 4051 0 • (859 ) 425-310

0 Fa x (859 ) 233-1822 • wvw.bhicgrassajrportcom
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                ICF KAISER INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
          COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 



                                                        Year        Ten Months          Year
                                                       Ended           Ended           Ended
                                                    December 31,    December 31,    February 28,
                                                        1996            1995            1995
                                                   -------------   -------------   --------------

<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C> 
Net income (loss) available for
  common shareholders                              $   3,656,000   $     449,000   $   (3,815,000)
                                                   =============   =============   ==============
                            


Weighted average of common shares
  outstanding not included in
  amounts below                                       22,041,312      21,131,763       20,957,443

Weighted average of common shares
  issuable on exercise of outstanding
  stock options                                           20,369               -                -

Weighted average of common shares
  issuable pursuant to an agreement
  with a former employee                                       -         385,152                -
                                                   -------------   -------------   --------------

Weighted average of common and
  common equivalent shares
  outstanding, as adjusted                            22,061,681      21,516,915       20,957,443
                                                         or              or              or
                                                      22,062,000      21,517,000       20,957,000
                                                   =============   =============   ==============



Net income (loss) per common share                 $        0.17   $        0.02   $        (0.18)
                                                   =============   =============   ==============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

     The following were the registrant's subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996,
other than subsidiaries that, if considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary at such date:


                                   Jurisdiction
                                        of
Name of Subsidiary                 Incorporation
------------------                 -------------
BHC Network Partner, Inc.             Delaware
Chris-Craft Television, Inc.          Delaware
     BHC Network Partner II, Inc.     Delaware
     BHC Network Partner III, Inc.    Delaware
     KCOP Television, Inc.            California
     Oregon Television, Inc.          Oregon
Pinelands, Inc.                       Delaware
United Television, Inc.               Delaware
     UTV of San Francisco, Inc.       California
     UTV of San Antonio, Inc.         Texas
     United Television Sales, Inc.    Delaware
# C_2018399EN.01005401.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/54

---

Action brought on 19 September 2018 — Sensient Colors Europe v Commission

(Case T-556/18)

(2018/C 399/69)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sensient Colors Europe GmbH (Geesthacht, Germany) (represented by: M. Hagenmeyer, D. Zechmeister und W. Berlit, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare as null and void the defendant’s decision of 31 July 2018 (DG Sante/E2/RP/amf(2018)4523972) to classify as invalid the request to place a novel food on the Union market as well as the update of the Union list provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) with document number NF 2018/0355, and end the application procedure; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare as null and void the defendant’s decision of 31 July 2018 (DG Sante/E2/RP/amf(2018)4523972) to classify as invalid the request to place a novel food on the Union market as well as the update of the Union list provided for in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) with document number NF 2018/0355, and end the application procedure; and

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, namely infringement of Article 6(1) and 6(5) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2469, (2) and Article 10(1) in conjunction with Article 10(3) and Article 11(1) or in conjunction with Article 12(2) of Regulation 2015/2283.

It submits, inter alia, that the defendant incorrectly assumed that the colouring extract based on dried butterfly pea flowers, on which the application is based, did not fall within the scope of Regulation 2015/2283 and was a food additive within the meaning of Article 3(2)(a) of Regulation No 1333/2008.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 (OJ 2015, L 327, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2469 of 20 December 2017 laying down administrative and scientific requirements for applications referred to in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council on novel food (OJ 2017, L 351, p. 64).

---