alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86935-86936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Rust Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Rust Foundation has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Filecoin 
Foundation for the Decentralized Web, Middletown, DE;

[[Page 86936]]

Helsing, Munich, GERMANY; and JetBrains GmbH, M[uuml]nchen, GERMANY, 
have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, JFrog Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Matter Labs, George Town, CAYMAN 
ISLANDS; Toyota Connected North America, Inc., Plano, TX; and Check 
Point Software Technologies Ltd., Tel Aviv, ISRAEL, have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Rust Foundation intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 14, 2022, Rust Foundation filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 19, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 5, 2023 (88 FR 69234).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27560 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7747

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCUS DARNELL PICKETT, a/k/a Eric Smith,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (6:09-cr-00178-GRA-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Darnell Pickett, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean 

Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Darnell Pickett appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence 

reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Pickett, No. 6:09-cr-00178-GRA-1 

(D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Res. 619 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 25, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 2406) to protect and enhance opportunities for recreational hunting, fishing, and shooting, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 

Natural Resources now printed in the bill. The committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
2 

•HRES 619 EH 

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment 

to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 

shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the 

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to 

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
3 

•HRES 619 EH 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

October 31, 1997

19684

#### State v. Dickenson

Affirmed
17894

#### Mario Const. v. Michael J. Ryan, Ltd.

February 19, 1997

Order No. 97-17

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for effective date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action(s)

On December 5, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons and entities are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 86209)          ( print page 86210)          ( print page 86211)          ( print page 86212)          ( print page 86213)          ( print page 86214)    

Dated: December 5, 2023.

Bradley T. Smith,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2023-27217 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commenting Opportunities: Animal

Welfare

Last Modified: 

Print

Tell us what you think!

Public participation is vital to the regulatory and decision-making process at APHIS.

Your input helps us make better-informed decisions about actions that may interest

or impact you. We offer many opportunities for public comment on animal welfare
issues. You can view and provide feedback on proposed rules and more.

Latest Commenting Opportunities

8/15/23

USDA Announces Proposal to Strengthen Enforcement of the Horse Protection Act

Learn About Recent Rules

Licensing Rule 

Animal Welfare Act Standards for Birds 

Contingency Planning Rule 

Related Links

APHIS: All Federal Register Posts

APHIS News and Updates

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about Animal Care, sign up for email updates.

Subscribe
#### Patten v. Ass'n of Apt. Owners of La Casa

17160

5/12/95

Affirmed
# C_2018190EN.01003301.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/33

---

Action brought on 15 March 2018 — Solwindet las Lomas v Commission

(Case T-190/18)

(2018/C 190/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Solwindet las Lomas, SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul European Commission Decision of 10 November 2017 in State aid case SA.40348 (2015/NN) — Spain — Support for electricity generation from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul European Commission Decision of 10 November 2017 in State aid case SA.40348 (2015/NN) — Spain — Support for electricity generation from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste; (1)

1

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed its obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure. The applicant alleges that there is evidence of serious difficulties relating to the length and the circumstances of the preliminary investigation procedure. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed its obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure. The applicant alleges that there is evidence of serious difficulties relating to the length and the circumstances of the preliminary investigation procedure.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in law and committed a manifest error of assessment regarding the assessment of payments received by existing facilities under the previous scheme. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in law and committed a manifest error of assessment regarding the assessment of payments received by existing facilities under the previous scheme.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to fulfil its duty to state reasons regarding the alleged existence of aid in relation to the payments received by existing facilities under the previous scheme. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to fulfil its duty to state reasons regarding the alleged existence of aid in relation to the payments received by existing facilities under the previous scheme.

---

(1)  OJ 2017 C 442, p. 1.

1

---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 26, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11337

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-20598-CR-DLG

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAZARO MARTINEZ-PADRON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 26, 1010)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BIRCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Vazquez, appointed counsel for Lazaro Martinez-Padron in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Martinez’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

However, we notice a clerical error in Martinez-Padron’s written judgment.

The district court orally sentenced Martinez-Padron to 63 months’ imprisonment,

but the written judgment states that he received a sentence of 60 months. Since the

oral pronouncement controls, see United States v. Khoury, 901 F.2d 975, 977 (11th

Cir. 1990), we VACATE the written judgment and REMAND for the district

court to enter a new judgment stating that Martinez-Padron received a sentence of

63 months’ imprisonment. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 36.

2
19335

#### State v. Tlusty

Affirmed
# Attachment O:

Partnership Agreement FormEPA WasteWise Partner Agreement

The EPA WasteWise Program encourages organizations to voluntarily reduce waste and conserve environmental resources while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Partners benefit from reduced waste generation by saving money and being recognized as environmental stewards in the United States.

With this agreement, my organization joins EPA's WasteWis e Program and agrees to:

Submit baseline data within 60 days of registering. Report on waste management activities and progress towards goals annually.

Commit to set goals and make continuous improvement related to :

o Prevent ing waste (i.e. source reduction)

o Recycl ing

o Purchas ing or manufactur ing recycled content products Use the WasteWise logo in a manner that is consistent with the use guidelines, available at www.epa.gov/waste/partnerships/wastewise/guidelines.htm

In return, EPA commits to provide:

Public recognition, by recognizing partners on our website. Partner support and communi cations assistance. An online waste reporting and data management system. The opportunity to compete for WasteWise Program Awards.

General Terms:

Either party can terminate this agreement at any time without prior notification and with no further oblig ation. EPA will not comment publicly regarding the withdrawal of Partners. Partner agrees that the activities it undertakes connected with this voluntary agreement are not intended to provide services to the federal government and that the Partner will not seek compensation from a federal agency. Partner agrees that it will not claim or imply that its participation in the WasteWise Program constitutes EPA approval or endorsement of anything other than its participation in the program and will not make statements or imply that EPA endorses the Partner or the purchase or sale of

th e Partner's products and services or the views of the Partner's organization. EPA may publish information about the Partner's program accomplishments, but will honor all requests to keep the Partner's reported waste data confidential. EPA may use the Par tner's logo in selected marketing materials. This added benefit is available only to Partners that have received an award for their commitment to reducing waste. EPA may periodically revise eligibility requirements.

Termination Clause:

Failure to comply with any of the terms of this partnership agreement can result in its termination and cessation of access to the benefits of the program, including use of the WasteWise Re

- T RAC system and the program logo

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Bytecode Alliance Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Stellar Development Foundation, San Francisco, CA, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, Suborbital, Ottawa, CANADA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Bytecode Alliance Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 20, 2022, Bytecode Alliance Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29379).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 19, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 5, 2023 (88 FR 69231).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27562 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
10592

#### State v. Fukunaga

Dismissed
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*FRED MYER

(AC 19069)

Lavery, C. J., and Sehaller and Daly, Js.

Argued April 27

officially released August 8, 2000

*Fred Myer,*pro se, the appellant (defendant).

*John A. East III,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *John A. Connelly,*state’s attorney, *sad Judith Rothschild-Rippe,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Fred Myer, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of failing to abate a septic system overflow in violation of General Statutes § 19a-36 and the Public Health Code, Regs., Conn. State Agencies, § 19-13-B103c (f). The defendant claims, inter alia, that the trial court failed to conduct a proper waiver canvass as required by Practice Book § 44-31 prior to allowing him to pro*302ceed pro se. The state concedes that the court did not conduct a waiver canvass at any time during the pendency of the proceedings, and that the defendant is therefore entitled to a new trial. See *State*v. *Miller,*55 Conn. App. 185, 189, 738 A.2d 1142 (1999) (“trial court’s failure to conduct an adequate canvass to ensure that the defendant’s waiver of the right to counsel was made knowingly and intelligently requires that the defendant be granted a new trial”).

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.2

1

 Practice Book § 44-3 provides: “A defendant shall be permitted to waive the right to counsel and shall be permitted to represent himself or herself at any stage of the proceedings, either prior to or following the appointment of counsel. A waiver will be accepted only after the judicial authority makes a thorough inquiry and is satisfied that the defendant:

“(1) Has been clearly advised of the right to the assistance of counsel, including the right to the assignment of counsel when so entitled;

*302“(2) Possesses the intelligence and capacity to appreciate the consequences of the decision to represent oneself;

“(3) Comprehends the nature of the charges and proceedings, the range of permissible punishments, and any additional facts essential to a broad understanding of the case; and

“(4) Has been made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.”

2

 The defendant also claims that (1) he was not afforded reasonable accommodations for his hearing impairment, (2) the court improperly ordered him to pay the town of Woodbury $3616.35 as reimbursement for legal fees and (3) the court improperly instructed the jury. In light of our conclusion regarding the court’s failure to canvass the defendant, we need not address these issues.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
otherwise stated in such filing. 28.