alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 872 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community Gardening Awareness 

Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Ms. MATSUI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community 

Gardening Awareness Week. 

Whereas countless American families live with hunger every 

day; 

Whereas countless American families do not have access to 

fresh produce in their neighborhoods; 

Whereas community gardens conserve limited resources and 

promote sustainability; 

Whereas community gardens provide an important and nutritious source of fresh produce donations for local food 

pantries and social service agencies; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 872 IH 

Whereas community gardens enable individuals to gain control over the quality, variety, and cost of their food supply; 

Whereas community gardening encourages Americans of diverse cultural and economic backgrounds to work together, foster a better sense of community, and improve 

the quality of their lives; 

Whereas community-based youth and school gardening programs encourage personal self-esteem and a healthy attitude toward learning; 

Whereas community gardening and greening projects provide 

a catalyst for neighborhood and community development; 

Whereas community gardens reduce city heat and preserve 

open spaces for both present and future generations; 

Whereas community gardens and other green spaces provide 

a more livable environment in American municipalities 

and present a positive local image to a community’s residents and visitors; 

Whereas community gardens help provide local food banks 

with fresh produce for those in need; and 

Whereas the second week in September is an appropriate 

week to designate as National Community Gardening 

Awareness Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Community Gardening 

3 Awareness Week, including— 

4 (1) raising awareness about the importance of 

5 community gardens and urban agriculture; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 872 IH 

1 (2) improving access to public land for the cre2 ation of sustainable food projects; 

3 (3) encouraging further growth of community 

4 gardens and other opportunities that increase food 

5 self-reliance, improve fitness, contribute to a cleaner 

6 environment, and enhance community development; 

7 and 

8 (4) supporting cooperative efforts among Fed9 eral, State, and local governments and nonprofit or10 ganizations to promote the development and expan11 sion of community gardens and to increase their ac12 cessibility to disadvantaged population groups. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby
certifies that the Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the Quarterly Report), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    MARK A. MAKI                                                                                                                       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Mark A. Maki Vice
President, Finance (Principal Financial Officer)
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (as delegate of the General Partner)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Steven D. Bonham, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unify Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| | /s/ STEVEN D. BONHAM                         | 
| | -------------------------------------------- | 
| | Steven D. Bonham                            
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: September 13, 2007

29

---
#### Craig v. County of Maui

21282

12/1/98

Reversed & Remanded
|                                              |   | Percentage |   | State of |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|------------|--------|---------------|
|                                              |   | Owned      |   | Incorporation |
| Subsidiary                                        |   |       |   |          |
|                                              |   |       |   |          |
| Community      Bank of Tri-County                 |   | 100%       |   | Maryland      |
|                                              |   |       |   |          |
| Tri-County      Capital Trust I                   |   | 100%       |   | Delaware      |
|                                              |   |       |   |          |
| Tri-County      Capital Trust II                  |   | 100%       |   | Delaware      |
|                                              |   |       |   |          |
| Subsidiaries      of Community Bank of Tri-County |   |       |   |          |
|                                              |   |       |   |          |
| Community      Mortgage Corporation of Tri-County |   | 100%       |   | Maryland      |

----
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Fr.OR,J; · 

sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Gary Schwartz <garytschwartz@msn.com> 

Friday, August 17, 2012 2:28PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Brainerd Air Service 

Just a quick note to you from a frequent flyer that my choice for BRD air service would be SkyWest. 

Thanks for your consideration. 

Gary Schwartz 

Pequot Lakes, MN 56472 

1 

·u
# C_2020103EN.01002101.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Numbi v Council

(Case T-168/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality)

(2020/C 103/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: John Numbi (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr John Numbi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr John Numbi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                           IBIS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
              STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME (LOSS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              ------------------------------------------------
                                                                  1998              1999             2000
                                                                  ----              ----             ----
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>              <C>
Basic net income (loss)..................................     $ (1,165,960)     $    827,129     $ (1,501,867)
                                                              ============      ============     ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding-
  basic..................................................        6,759,870         7,403,803        8,285,893
Net additional common shares upon assumed
  exercise of stock options and warrants.................               --           414,348               --
                                                              ------------      ------------     ------------
Weighted average commons shares outstanding-
  diluted................................................        6,759,870         7,818,151        8,285,893
                                                              ------------      ------------     ------------
Net income (loss) per common share
  Basic..................................................     $      (0.17)     $       0.11     $      (0.18)
                                                              ============      ============     ============
  Diluted................................................     $      (0.17)     $       0.11     $      (0.18)
                                                              ============      ============     ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: March 8, 2011
/s/ TODD E. WILLETodd E. WilleChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Todd E. Wille, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unify Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants third fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| | /s/ TODD E. WILLE                     | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Todd E. Wille                        
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        

Dated: December 14, 2007

28

---
# C_2020378EN.01001302.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — NM, acting as liquidator of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON

(Case C-530/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Articles 5 and 9 - Obligation of the air carrier to offer hotel accommodation to passengers whose flights have been cancelled - Damage suffered by a passenger during her stay at the hotel providing the accommodation - Possibility of invoking the liability of the air carrier as a result of negligence on the part of employees of the hotel)

(2020/C 378/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NM, acting as liquidator of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH

Defendant: ON

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 9(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation of the air carrier under that provision to offer hotel accommodation free of charge to the passengers referred to therein does not mean that that carrier is required to take care of the accommodation arrangements as such. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 9(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation of the air carrier under that provision to offer hotel accommodation free of charge to the passengers referred to therein does not mean that that carrier is required to take care of the accommodation arrangements as such.

| 2. | Regulation No 261/2004 must be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier which, under Article 9(1)(b) of that regulation, has offered hotel accommodation to a passenger whose flight has been cancelled cannot be required, on the basis of that regulation alone, to compensate that passenger for damage caused by fault on the part of employees of that hotel. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Regulation No 261/2004 must be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier which, under Article 9(1)(b) of that regulation, has offered hotel accommodation to a passenger whose flight has been cancelled cannot be required, on the basis of that regulation alone, to compensate that passenger for damage caused by fault on the part of employees of that hotel.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
Agreement
made this 5th day of August 2016 by and between Regen Bioparma, Inc. (“Company) and David R. Koos (“Koos”)


WHEREAS,
On February 13, 2015 Koos was issued Nine Million of the Company’s Common Shares (“Compensation Common Shares”)
pursuant to that employment agreement entered into by and between Koos and the Company on February 11, 2015 ( “Employment
Agreement”)


WHEREAS
, on March 17, 2015 Koos was issued Two Million Five Hundred Thousand shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (
“Compensation Preferred Stock”)


WHEREAS
the Compensation Common Shares may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by Koos
(“Transfer Restriction”) until 18 months of constant employment of Koos has expired from the date of the full execution
of the Employment Agreement.


WHEREAS
the Compensation Preferred Stock may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by Koos
(“Transfer Restriction”) until 18 months of constant employment of Koos has expired from the date of the full execution
of the Employment Agreement.


THEREFORE,
IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:


		(a)	Koos
                                         shall receive Two Hundred shares of the Company’s Series AA Preferred Stock.



		(b)	Neither
                                         The Compensation Common Shares or the Compensation Preferred Stock may be sold, transferred,
                                         assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by Koos until that date which
                                         is 184 days from August 5, 2016 (“New Vesting Date”).



		(c)	In
                                         the event that Koos’ employment by the Company is terminated pursuant to Section
                                         6(a)(iv) or Section 6(a) (v) of the Employment Agreement both of the Compensation Common
                                         Shares and the Compensation Preferred Stock shall be returned by Koos to the Company.



This
instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior agreements
of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. It may be changed only by an agreement in writing signed by a party
against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, extension or discharge is sought.


The
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State or California.
Any action to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in the state courts located in San Diego County, State of California.


 


IN
WHITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	Company	Koos
	By:__/s/David
    R. Koos________________	By:/s/
    David R. Koos_______________
	It’s:Chairman
    and CEO	 
	August
    5, 2016	August
    5, 2016
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 0262

_____________________________
D ECEMBER L EIGH W EBB , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County

. Melissa G. Olin
, Judge

. May 10, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J. , and L EWIS and T ANENBAUM , JJ.
, concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross S. Haine II
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
19582

#### State v. Gayagoy

Affirmed