alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerI, Paula J. Meiler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
25

 
CSB BANCORP, INC. a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2007                                                                              /s/ Paula J. Meiler   Paula J. Meiler   Senior Vice President and
Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care

APHIS-23-010 • Issued June 2023

Guinea Pig 

Eye Health 

Abnormal Guinea Pig Eye Conditions 

Talk with your 

veterinarian if you 

notice any of these 

signs or symptoms of 

eye disease in your 

guinea pigs.

PRACTICAL TIP

Good management 

and husbandry 

can prevent many 

illnesses and injuries 

in your guinea pigs:

• Avoid overcrowding

• Sanitize pens and 

equipment regularly

• Ventilate buildings 

to ensure good air 

quality

Guinea pigs normally have clear eyes that are of 

equal size and shape to each other. While most 

guinea pigs have dark brown or black eyes, some 

lighter colored pigs have eyes that are blue or red. 

The eyelids are smooth and glide over the entire 

surface of the eye when they blink. 

Infections affecting the eye 

or other areas of the body, 

such as upper respiratory or 

skin infections, can result in 

conjunctivitis or “pinkeye.” 

You may see: 

● Redness or “bloodshot” 

appearance

● Swollen eyelids

● Thick discharge or crusty appearance around 

the eyes and nose

Trauma can damage the 

eye or lead to an infection. 

Trauma can be caused 

by scratching, fighting, 

or material getting stuck 

inside the eyelid or injuring 

the eye. You may see: 

● Squinting in pain

● Watery eyes

● Small white dot on the eye surface 

● General bluish-white cloudiness

Birth Defects can result in an abnormal shape 

or position of the eye or surrounding parts. 

Examples include:

● One or both eyes smaller 

than normal or missing

● Eyelid rolling inward

● Misplaced eyelashes 

or other hairs that rub 

against the eye

You may see:

● White or blue cloudiness

● Redness

● Excessive tears or mucus

● Squinting or rubbing the 

eye

Exophthalmos is a 

condition that causes the 

eye to bulge outward. It 

can cause the eye surface 

to dry out because the eyelid can’t cover the 

whole eye. Exophthalmos may be caused by:

● Infection, like a tooth root 

abscess

● Swelling from trauma

● Glaucoma

● Cancer

You may see:

● Thick discharge

● Blood vessels and/or fleshy 

tissue on the eye surface

Metabolic changes

occur with age or growth 

and may signal disease 

elsewhere in the body. 

While these conditions 

can accompany disease, 

the following eye 

conditions don’t typically require immediate 

veterinary treatment: 

● Cataract: The lens (center of eye) becomes 

opaque gray/white/blue and shiny. This is 

common with diabetes. 

● “Fatty” or “pea” eye: Fat deposits accumulate 

under the eye (usually no treatment needed).

DID YOU KNOW? 

Many eye conditions, 

whether they begin in 

the eye or elsewhere 

in the body, can be 

passed from animal to 

animal. It’s important 

to separate sick guinea 

pigs from healthy ones, 

even if they are still 

“acting” normal.

Blood vessels on eye 

surface Cloudiness from infection 

or trauma 

Skin infection affecting 

eye health

“Pea” eye

Mucous discharge from 

infection, birth defect, or 

trauma 

Squinting or abnormally 

small eye with mild 

discharge
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86924-86925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27539]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Indian Gaming; Extension of Tribal-State Class III Gaming 
Compacts in California

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming 
compacts between two Tribes in California and the State of California.

DATES: The extension takes effect on December 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d59cbbb1bcb4bb92b4b8bcbbb295b7bcb4fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dd4f3f9f4fcf3dafcf0f4f3faddfff4fcb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An extension to an existing Tribal-State 
Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if 
the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 
293.5. The

[[Page 86925]]

following Tribes and the State of California have reached an agreement 
to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III 
gaming compacts to December 31, 2024: the Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay 
Indians, California; and the Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians 
of California. This publication provides notice of the new expiration 
date of the compacts.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-27539 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 9 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 9

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2015.
    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of daily meeting of the 
House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative 
business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 
Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John J. Limbert, President and Chief Executive Officer, and A. Lee Miller, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ JOHN J. LIMBERT                                   | /s/ A. LEE MILLER                                              
|----------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|John J. Limbert
President and
Chief Executive Officer | A. Lee Miller
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. Namahoe

17979

1/27/95

Affirmed
929 P.2d 96

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

17164

#### McVay v. Hawaii Meat Co., Ltd.

November 22, 1996

Order No. 96-40

Affirmed
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) andRule 15d-14(b)**

**Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18**

**of the United Sates Code,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marijo L. Ahlgrimm, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 30,  2004 |   /s/  Marijo L. Ahlgrimm |   |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|            | Marijo L.  Ahlgrimm,                |
|            | Chief  Financial Officer            |

 

----
20290

#### State v. Freeman

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 5, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 28 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-96, CP2024-98.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-27416 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2021502EN.01000401.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 October 2021 — NRW. Bank v Single Resolution Board (SRB), Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-662/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Board (SRB) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Determination of the 2016 ex ante contribution - Action for annulment - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Late submission - Challengeable act - Confirmatory act)

(2021/C 502/05)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: NRW. Bank (represented by: J. Seitz, J. Witte and D. Flore, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, J. Kerlin and P. A. Messina, acting as Agents, and B. Meyring, S. Schelo, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, Rechtsanwälte), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Sikora-Kalėda and M. J. Bauerschmidt, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented initially by: D. Triantafyllou, K.-P. Wojcik and A. Steiblytė, and subsequently by D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2019, NRW. Bank v SRB (T-466/16, not published, EU:T:2019:445); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2019, NRW. Bank v SRB (T-466/16, not published, EU:T:2019:445);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.

---
**Exhibit23.3**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directorsand ShareholdersKaiser Group Holdings, Inc.:

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-107912)on Form S-8 of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 15, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofKaiser-Hill Company, LLC as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, members’ equity and cash flowsfor each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report onForm 10-K of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc.

**KPMG LLP**

Denver, ColoradoMarch 29, 2007

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7739

STEWART RUSSELL BUCHANAN; JANICE A. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus DAVID BEASLEY, Governor; MICHAEL W. MOORE, Commissioner; GEORGE ROOF; CARL FREDRICKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-1894-3-18BC) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stewart Russell Buchanan, Janice A. Bradley, Appellants Pro Se. Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., Georgia Anna Mitchell, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date Appellant wrote on his notice of appeal is the earliest date it would have been submitted to prison authorities. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellants filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).The district court entered its order on August 29, 1997; Appellants filed a timely motion for extension of time to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The district court entered its order denying Appellants' motion on October 6, 1997. Appellants' notice of appeal was filed on November 21, 1997, * which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellants' failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellants' appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Webinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking for Distribution Transformers Medium-Voltage Working Group Meeting

Meeting Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email

Corel, Dale Sr. Design Engineer NEMA 9377 W. Higgins Rd. Rosemont IL 60018 N/A N/A dale.corel@emerson.com

Drexler, P.E., Charles R VP of Operations / 

Engineering

Kentucky Association of Electric 

Cooperatives

4515 Bishop Lane Louisville KY 40218 502-451-2430 N/A charlied@uus.org

Freeman, Jeremiah Energy Analyst New West Technologies, LLC 1000 Independence Ave, 

SW

Washington DC 20585 N/A N/A jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov

Kaja, Brian Core and Coil Design 

Engineer

GE Energy Distribution 

Transformers

7000 West Bert Kouns 

Industrial Loop

Shreverport LA 71129 N/A N/A brian.kaja@ge.com

Lyke, Richard F. Principal Engineer, 

Product Development & 

Applications Engineering

AK Steel Corporation 705 Curtis Street Middletown OH 45043-0001 513-425-5709 513-425-5866 richard.lyke@aksteel.com

May, Scott Senior Product Manager Siemens Industry Inc. 621 Green Gap Shores Troy NC 27371 N/A N/A scott.may@siemens.com

Petrosino, Thomas Consultant Prolec GE / TRP Consulting 1917 Park Road Charlotte NC 28203 704-904-5509 N/A tpetrosino@carolina.rr.com

Rosenfeld, Arthur H. Distinguished Scientist 

Emeritus

Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory

160 Southampton Avenue Berkley CA 94707 916-495-2227 510-486-5454 AHRosenfeld@lbl.gov

artrosenfeld@gmail.com

Rossetti, John Systems Engineer Memphis Light Gas and Water 220 South Main Memphis TN 38103 N/A N/A jrossetti@mlgw.org

Smith, Robert Product Manager Federal Pacific 601 Old Airport Rd Bristol VA 24201 276-645-8836 N/A bsmith@federalpacific.com

Zhimei, Luo Consultant Navigant Consulting 1801 K Street, NW, Suite 

500

Washington DC 20006 240-401-5410 202-973-2401 zhimei.luo@Navigant.com
# Intraherd_Sample_Size_Matrix

ofM MM     

Input a value only if different than default

Input value is required. Enter the Confidence Level used in the Animal Sample Size Table. Note: if the number of animals recommended by that calculator was not sampled, estimate the probability of detection within the premises by decreasing the confidence level in the animal sample size table until the approate cell in the table shows the number of animals actually sampled.
# C_2022084EN.01000602.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021 — PlasticsEurope AISBL v European Chemicals Agency, French Republic, ClientEarth

(Case C-876/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation - List of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as a substance of very high concern)

(2022/C 84/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: PlasticsEurope AISBL (represented: initially by R. Cana, E. Mullier and F. Mattioli, and subsequently by R. Cana and E. Mullier, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: W. Broere, A.K. Hautamäki and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, advocaat), French Republic (represented by: T. Stehelin and E. Leclerc, acting as Agents), ClientEarth (represented by: P. Kirch, avocat)

Intervener in support of the other parties to the proceedings: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: D. Klebs, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders PlasticsEurope AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PlasticsEurope AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---
# C_2020414EN.01001001.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Göteborg — Sweden) — Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket v Combinova AB

(Case C-476/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Union Customs Code - Article 124(1)(k) - Extinction of the customs debt in the event the goods are not used - Concept of ‘goods that have been used’ - Inward processing procedure - Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with requirements provided for under the inward processing procedure - Bill of discharge not submitted within the prescribed time limit)

(2020/C 414/11)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Kammarrätten i Göteborg

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket

Opposing party: Combinova AB

Operative part of the judgment

Article 124(1)(k) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code must be interpreted as meaning that the use of the goods referred to in that provision concerns only use which goes beyond the processing operations authorised by the customs authority under the inward processing procedure provided for in Article 256 of that code, and not use in accordance with those authorised processing operations.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---