alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Three Months Ended
    
    
    Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    September 30,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Basic Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    863,090
    
    
    $
    813,564
    
    
    $
    2,634,068
    
    
    $
    2,264,123Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,462,885
    
    
    
    2,505,785
    
    
    
    2,470,875
    
    
    
    2,536,201Basic Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.35
    
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    1.07
    
    
    $
    0.89Diluted Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    863,090
    
    
    $
    813,564
    
    
    $
    2,634,068
    
    
    $
    2,264,123Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,462,885
    
    
    
    2,505,785
    
    
    
    2,470,875
    
    
    
    2,536,201Weighted average effect of
assumed stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,149
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,212Total
    
    
    2,462,885
    
    
    
    2,507,934
    
    
    
    2,475,000
    
    
    
    2,539,413Diluted Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.35
    
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    1.07
    
    
    $
    0.89
 
 21.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15

                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Education Management Corporation (a Pennsylvania corporation) and Subsidiaries
as of September 30, 1999, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended September 30, 1999 and
1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation
and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 (not presented herein), and, in our report
dated July 28, 1999, we expressed an unqualified opinion on that statement. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 1999, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.




                                        /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
 October 20, 1999
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/22/2011 12:16 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |"Joseph L. Suchecki" <jsuchecki@emamail.org> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |02/22/2011 11:51 AM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |EMA Response to Question on IMO Allowance Comment | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------|

TO: Melanie King US EPA FROM: Joe Suchecki EMA DATE: February 22, 2011 RE: Request for Clarification on Comment Regarding IMO Allowances

In an email dated February 16, 2011, you asked for clarification of a comment that EMA submitted on proposed changes to the NSPS for Compression Ignition engines. The subject comment stated that certain stipulated allowances for temperature and humidity correction from IMO ANNEX VI, Sections 6.3.11 and 6.4.13 should be incorporated into the NSPS. More specifically you asked for clarification as to whether EMA was asking to be able to use different reference temperature and humidity values when testing engines greater than 30 L/cyl.

I have checked with EMA members that provide stationary engines of that size to clarify the intent of the comment. After some discussion, and now having a better understanding of both the CI NSPS and IMO regulations, we believe that it is not necessary to incorporate those IMO allowances for stationary engines. EMA now believes that those allowances add a complicating set of factors that are not needed.

EMA withdraws the request in our previous comments related to incorporating allowances from Sections 6.3.11 and 6.4.13. EMA believes that EPA does not need to take any action on this specific comment.

Joseph L. Suchecki Director, Public Affairs Engine Manufacturers Association333 W. Wacker Drive, Suite 810

Chicago, IL 60606 312-929-1978
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Annual Report of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto such officer’s knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.        Date: March 16, 2007 /s/ Jeffrey M. Mattich   Jeffrey M. Mattich, Chief Financial Officer      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31465 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES R. RESPERT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-17-2-F

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * James R. Respert appeals from his jury-verdict convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately two kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, aiding and abetting the attempted possession of approximately two kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, and carrying and possession of a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. Respert argues that: (1) the district court erroneously admitted hearsay testimony from a coconspirator without establishing the existence of a conspiracy; (2) the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to supportNo. 00-31465 -2- the jury’s verdict as to each of his convictions; and (3) the district court erred by denying his motion for mistrial. As Respert failed to move the district court for the requisite showing to permit the admission of a coconspirator’s hearsay testimony, this issue is reviewed only for plain error.
See United States v. Miller , 799 F.2d 985, 989 (5th Cir. 1986). Examination of the evidence produced at trial relevant to this issue indicate that there was no error, plain or otherwise. A thorough review of the evidence produced at trial indicates that a rational jury could have found that the requisite elements for each of the charged offenses had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Medina , 161 F.3d 867, 872 (5th Cir. 1998). As Respert failed to object to the bases for his motion for mistrial, we review this issue only for plain error. See United States v. Caucci , 635 F.2d 441, 448 (5th Cir. 1981). The evidence challenged by Respert as extrinsic was properly construed to be intrinsic evidence that established background information for the charged offense. See United States v. Miranda , 248 F.3d 434, 440 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 410 (2001). Furthermore, the alleged prejudicial evidence did not have a substantial impact on the jury’s verdict, when viewed in light of the entire record. See United States v. Paul , 142 F.3d 836, 844 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the district court did not plainly err by denying Respert’s motion for mistrial.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2022171EN.01000201.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 — European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others

(Joined Cases C-167/19 P and C-171/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Aid in favour of the German dairy sector - Financing of milk quality tests - Article 108(2) TFUE - Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 6(1) - Obligation for the European Commission to summarise the relevant issues of fact and law in that decision - Scope - Rights of interested parties to be involved in the administrative procedure - Breach of an essential procedural requirement - Consequences for the lawfulness of the final decision)

(2022/C 171/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, P. Němečková and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Freistaat Bayern (Germany) (represented by: U. Soltész and H. Weiß, Rechtsanwälte) (C-167/19 P), Interessengemeinschaft privater Milchverarbeiter Bayerns eV, Genossenschaftsverband Bayern eV, Verband der Bayerischen Privaten Milchwirtschaft eV (represented by: C. Bittner and N. Langhans, Rechtsanwälte) (C-171/19 P)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                 COMPUSA INC.

                                COMPUTATIONS OF
                 INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                  THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED             THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                                -------------------------         -------------------------  
                                                MARCH 29,        MARCH 23,        MARCH 29,        MARCH 23, 
                                                  1997             1996             1997             1996
                                                --------         --------         --------         --------  
<S>                                             <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Common shares issued at beginning
 of period.................................       91,384           89,493           90,216           80,932
Weighted average number of common
 shares issued during the period...........           94              222              824            5,953
Weighted average treasury shares...........         (368)            (448)            (375)            (152)
Incremental shares related to assumed
 exercise of stock options.................        3,340            3,307            3,911            3,488
                                                 -------          -------          -------          -------

Weighted common and common equivalent
 shares....................................       94,450           92,574           94,576           90,221
                                                 =======          =======          =======          =======

Net income.................................      $32,715          $22,933          $70,989          $47,888
                                                 =======          =======          =======          =======
Income per common and common equivalent
 share (1).................................      $  0.35          $  0.25          $  0.75          $  0.53
                                                 =======          =======          =======          =======    
</TABLE>
----------------
(1) The computation of income per common share on a fully diluted basis does not
    materially differ from the amounts calculated on a primary basis shown
    above.
19581

#### State v. Mason

Affirmed
#### State v. Takakura

18880

10/30/96

Reversed and Remanded
# C_2019131EN.01004802.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/48

---

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Chrome Hearts v EUIPO — Shenzhen Van St. Lonh Jewelry (Representation of a cross)

(Case T-137/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cross - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 131/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chrome Hearts LLC (Hollywood, California, United States) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Shenzhen Van St. Lonh Jewelry Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2017 (Case R 766/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Chrome Hearts and Shenzhen Van St. Lonh Jewelry Co.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 
AT JULY 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR 
THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
              
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   772427
<ALLOWANCES>                                     13330
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  766108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         602822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7421
<OTHER-SE>                                      115808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    766108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 72722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  3150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  27825
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              17032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     17032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<FN>
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDE AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary M. De Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gary M. De Laurentiis
--------------------------
Gary M. De Laurentiis
Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 2004
44 Canal Cent er Pl aza ▪ Sui t e 310 ▪ Al exandr i a, Vi r gi ni a 22314 ▪ Tel : (703) 684-0084 ▪ Fax: (703) 684-0427

VIA E-MAIL

July 7, 2010

Mr. Jeffrey A. Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Mr. William Neuffer

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Submission of Existing Emissions Data- Guardian Fiberglass, Inc.

Dear Messrs. Telander and Neuffer:

The transmission of this data from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association 

(“NAIMA”) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is in fulfillment of Guardian 

Fiberglass, Inc. (“Guardian”) and NAIMA’s commitment to provide EPA existing emissions 

data identified in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA.

NAIMA is submitting .pdf versions via-email of existing emissions data for formaldehyde, 

phenol, and methanol from the Compliance Test Report, “Guardian Fiberglass, Inc. Collection, 

Incinerator, and Baghouse Stacks.” In addition, existing emissions data for particulate matter are 

also included. This data was collected at Guardian’s Albion, Michigan; Kingman, Arizona; 

Inwood, West Virginia; Winnsboro, South Carolina; and Mineral Wells, Mississippi facilities. 

Guardian has not designated any portion of the data attached hereto as confidential business 

information (“CBI”). With the other company submissions that you will receive from NAIMA, 

CBI will be redacted from the copies sent to you, and the CBI will be marked as such and will be 

sent to:

Mr. Roberto Morales, Document Control Officer
109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or Chris Martin at (703) 684-0084. 

We can also be contacted by e-mail at acrane@naima.org or cmartin@naima.org.

Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane 

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Attachment
<PAGE>   1



                  SCIENTIFIC GAMES HOLDINGS CORP. EXHIBIT 11
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three-month period     Nine-month period
                                                     ended September 30,    ended September 30,
                                                     1996        1995         1996       1995

<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       5,894       5,901      13,214      16,505

Weighted average Common stock outstanding. . . .      12,472      12,918      12,870      12,876

Effect of Common stock equivalents (stock
 options), at average market price   . . . . . .         519         760         623         747
                                                  ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
  Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      12,991      13,678      13,493      13,623
                                                  ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Net earnings per common share. . . . . . . . . .  $     0.45  $     0.43  $     0.98  $     1.21
                                                  ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT OT
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SBS Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report), I, Clarence W. Peckham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Clarence W. PeckhamClarence W. Peckham
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2004