alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Zaremba,
      Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
                  November 14, 2007/s/
                  Richard ZarembaRichard
                  ZarembaSenior
                  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer
                  and Secretary




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained by
      MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
18161, 18216

#### United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 745, AFL-CIO v. WCC Associates

April 15, 1997

Order No. 97-30

Vacated in part, Granted in part
19700

#### State v. Hopps

Affirmed
20033

#### State v. Ortiz

Affirmed
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


     I, George Aronson,  the Chief Financial Officer of Direct Insite Corp, (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the  quarterly
          period  ended June 30, 2002 (the  "report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: August 14, 2002


                                        /s/ George Aronson
                                        -------------------------------
                                        NAME:  George Aronson
                                        TITLE: Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


     I, Warren Wright,  the Chief Executive  Officer of Direct Insite Corp, (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (3)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the  quarterly
          period  ended June 30, 2002 (the  "report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (4)  the  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: August 14, 2002


                                        /s/  Warren Wright
                                        -------------------------------
                                        NAME:   Warren Wright
                                        TITLE:  Chief Executive Officer
September 7, 1999

21538

#### Jane Doe, In re

Reversed
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**Independent Accountants’ ReviewReport**

 

The Board of Directors 

Education Management Corporation 

 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and subsidiaries as of December31, 2002, and the related condensed consolidated statements income and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. The condensed consolidatedbalance sheet of Education Management Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods then ended were reviewed by otheraccountants whose report dated January 25, 2002 stated that they were not aware of any material modifications that should be made to those statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

We conducted our review in accordance withstandards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible forfinancial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing anopinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidatedfinancial statements at December 31, 2002, and for the three-month and six-month period then ended for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditingstandards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ investment, and cashflows for the year then ended not presented herein and in our report dated August 1, 2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensedconsolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

    January 27, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that on November 9, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*                     (the “Act”), Utility Broadband Alliance, Inc. (“UBBA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Specifically, MosoLabs, Sacramento, CA; National Grid, Waltham, MA; CPS Energy, San Antonio, TX; Advantech Co., Ltd., Blue Ash, OH; Dominion Energy, Richmond, VA; ST Microelectronics International N.V., Geneva, SWITZERLAND; and Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA have been added as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open and UBBA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 4, 2021, UBBA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 10, 2021 (86 FR 30981).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 18, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69672).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27613 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### McElroy v. Sobin

20365

11/20/98

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part & Remanded
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa New chapter on Nipah virus encephalitis (Chapter 8.Y.) / page 1

Item_4_2_5_ New chapter on Nipah virus encephalitis (Chapter 8.Y.) / page 3

Annex 25

CHAPTER 8.Y.INFECTION WITH NIPAH VIRUS

**Article 8.Y.1.**

General provisions

Nipah virus can infect a wide range of species, including humans, but only pigs and horses are considered to play a significant role in the epidemiology of the disease. For the *Terrestrial Code*, *infection* with Nipah virus is defined as an *infection* of pigs and horses ~~and pigs~~(hereafter ‘susceptible animal’) with Nipah virus.

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with Nipah virus:

1)	Nipah virus has been isolated and identified as such in a sample from a susceptible animal; or 

2)	antigen or nucleic acid specific to Nipah virus has been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with Nipah virus, epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*, or giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with Nipah virus; or

3)	seroconversion specific to Nipah virus, which is not the consequence of *vaccination*, has been detected in a susceptible animal; or

4)	antibodies specific to Nipah virus, which are not the consequence of *vaccination*, have been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*, or giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with Nipah virus.

Standards for diagnosis and vaccines, as well as information on the epidemiology, are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*. 

____________________________

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2024	1

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023*

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023*
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 80 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 

the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. GOODLATTE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

the Judiciary in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $15,580,600.00 for the One Hundred 

9 Fourteenth Congress. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 80 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,768,700.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2015, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2016; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,811,900.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2016, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2017. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Utility Broadband Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that on November 9, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq (the ``Act''), Utility Broadband Alliance, 
Inc. (``UBBA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Specifically, MosoLabs, Sacramento, CA; National Grid, Waltham, MA; 
CPS Energy, San Antonio, TX; Advantech Co., Ltd., Blue Ash, OH; 
Dominion Energy, Richmond, VA; ST Microelectronics International N.V., 
Geneva, SWITZERLAND; and Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open and UBBA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 4, 2021, UBBA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 10, 
2021 (86 FR 30981).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 18, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69672).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27613 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IV 

House Calendar No. 151 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 893 

[Report No. 114–791] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 954) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the individual mandate certain 

individuals who had coverage under a terminated qualified health plan 

funded through the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Mr. BURGESS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 954) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the 

individual mandate certain individuals who had coverage 

under a terminated qualified health plan funded through 

the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 954) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:27 Sep 26, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR893.RH HR893

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 893 RH 

1 empt from the individual mandate certain individuals who 

2 had coverage under a terminated qualified health plan 

3 funded through the Consumer Operated and Oriented 

4 Plan (CO-OP) program. All points of order against consid5 eration of the bill are waived. The amendment in the na6 ture of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 

7 Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be consid8 ered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered 

9 as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, 

10 as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 

11 considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

12 further amendment thereto, to final passage without inter13 vening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally di14 vided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

15 member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) 

16 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 151 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 893 

[Report No. 114–791] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 954) 

gram. sumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) proqualified health plan funded through the Conviduals who had coverage under a terminated exempt from the individual mandate certain indito amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
....., •.--..

STATE OF CONNECTIClJ'f

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

AND

NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY

COMPANY

)

)

)

)

)

)

TR.:..DING AGREEMENT AND ORDER NO. 8151

MODIFICATION

., " .TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER

MODIFICAIrON

In the maner ofa Trnding Agreement and Order between the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and

Nonhensl Nuclear Energy Company ("NNECO").

WHEREAS, the Commissioner and NNECO, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order

No. 8152 issued on July 9, 1998, do now, by mutual agreement, modify said Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

1. Change paragraph C.2. to read as follows:

NNECO shall complete approved stack testing on the generators by January 31, 1999.

All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8J 52 issued by the Commissioner acting under Chapter 446c,

Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a~176, 22a-l77 and 22a-!78 of the Conneclicut General $l<.:tutes shall remain in effect.

The Northeast Nuclear Energy Company hereby consents to the entl')' of this modification to the Trading Agreement and Order

without funher notice.

Signature:

• NOnh.asl~~ E~compan\

Type Name: PbjJip M Sma]], Its Attorney

Entered as a modification of an Order of the Commissioner 0

6.1;1;.. day 0[1:\...... 1998.

CITY OF WATERFORD LAND RECORDS

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL.

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.

Type Title: Assi stant Genera] Counsel

Northeast Utilities Service Company

Dale: December 30 , J 998

mbered 8152 this

(Plinled on Recycled Pape:)

79 EICl Street • Harl!OI~. cr 06106·5127

1111 p;Jld ~p .$t at c. Cl.ln

An £quel OppOrlUnily E,.,plc.vcr
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael BROWN, a/k/a Rasheem Russell, a/k/a Hakeem Brown, a/k/a Rasheem Jamal Russell, a/k/a Michael Haseem Brown, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-6716.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.

Decided Oct. 7, 2005.

Thomas Russell Quinn, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Kathleen Marie Kahoe, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1744

AMRO ELSAYED; LOLA SALAMAH , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. FAMILY FARE LLC; M.M. FOWLER INC.; LEE BARNES, JR., Individually and as president of Family Fare LLC. and M.M. Fowler Inc.; DONALD PILCHER, Individually , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Loretta C. Biggs, Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge s ; L. Patrick Auld, Magistrate Judge . ( 1:18

- cv - 01045

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : June 2 9 , 2023 Decided: September 11, 2023

Before GREGORY and RUSHING , Circuit Judge s , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Amro Elsayed , Lola Salamah , Appellants Pro Se. William Sutton Cherry, III , Jessica Blair Vickers , MANNING, FULTON & SKINNER, PA , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1744 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/11/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Amro Elsaye d and Lo la Salamah appeal several of the district court’s order s entered
in this action which alleged claims arising out of the termination of a franchise agreement

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court ’s order s
. Elsayed v. Family Fare LLC , No. 1:18

- cv - 01045

- CCE

- LPA , (M.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2020; Aug. 10, 2020; Aug. 25, 2020; Feb. 9, 2021 ; Jun e 4, 2021 ) . W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this c ourt and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1744 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/11/2023 Pg: 2 of 2