alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 2023

There were 12 surveillance inspections conducted at 10 different sites for a total of 

60 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities. 

The water temperatures continued to increase in response to warmer air 

temperatures. Routine harvest continued. One Category 2 site is scheduled for 

biweekly sampling. All other sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and 

were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

August 2022 81 0 25138

September 2022 74 0 25212

October 2022 66 0 25278

November 2022 55 0 25333

December 2022 69 0 25402

January 2023 100 0 25502

February 2023 74 0 25576

March 2023 35 0 25611

April 2023 59 0 25670

May 2023 60 0 25730

June 2023 55 1 25785

July 2023 60 0 25845
# C_2019044EN.01007401.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/74

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Antonakopoulos v Parliament

(Case T-590/18 R)

((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Officials - Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Damage to reputation - No urgency))

(2019/C 44/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Leonidas Antonakopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 25 September 2018 suspending the applicant from duties for an indefinite duration without withholding remuneration.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 88

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
                in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

     Mr. Royce (for himself and Mr. Engel) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
                in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $15,223,986 for the One Hundred 
Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,611,993 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $7,611,993 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019072EN.01000901.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 December 2018 — Skatteverket v Sögård Fastigheter AB

(Case C-787/18)

(2019/C 72/12)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Skatteverket

Respondent: Sögård Fastigheter AB

Questions referred

| 1. | If a seller of a property, on the basis of the rules introduced by the Member State in accordance with Article 188(2) of the VAT Directive, (1) has not adjusted a deduction of input tax because the purchaser intends to use the property exclusively for transactions giving rise to a right of deduction, does that then preclude, in a case where the adjustment period continues to run, the purchaser being required to adjust the deduction at a subsequent time when the purchaser in turn transfers the property to someone who does not intend to use the property for such transactions? |
| --- | --- |

1.

If a seller of a property, on the basis of the rules introduced by the Member State in accordance with Article 188(2) of the VAT Directive, (1) has not adjusted a deduction of input tax because the purchaser intends to use the property exclusively for transactions giving rise to a right of deduction, does that then preclude, in a case where the adjustment period continues to run, the purchaser being required to adjust the deduction at a subsequent time when the purchaser in turn transfers the property to someone who does not intend to use the property for such transactions?

| 2. | Does it alter the answer to the first question if the first transfer referred to in that question constitutes a transfer of assets as referred to in Article 19 of the VAT Directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does it alter the answer to the first question if the first transfer referred to in that question constitutes a transfer of assets as referred to in Article 19 of the VAT Directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
# C_2019122EN.01000701.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 17 December 2018 — Athesia Energy Srl and Others v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Gestore dei Servizi Energetici (GSE) SpA

(Case C-799/18)

(2019/C 122/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Athesia Energy Srl, Pv Project Cologna S.r.l., Belriccetto S.r.l., Itt Energy S.r.l., Pietra dei Fiori S.r.l., Energia Solare S.r.l., Green Hunter S.p.A, Actasol 5 S.r.l., Actasol 6 S.r.l., Cinque S.r.l., Spf Energy Uno S.r.l., Spr Energy Due S.r.l., Spf Energy Tre S.r.l., Bulicata S.r.l., Energy Line S.r.l., Marche Solare 1 S.r.l.

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA

Question referred

Does EU law preclude the application of a provision of national law, such as that in Article 26(2) and (3) of Decree-Law No 91/2014, as converted by Law No 116/2014, which significantly reduces or delays the payment of incentives already granted by law and defined on the basis of corresponding agreements concluded by undertakings generating electrical energy by means of photovoltaic conversion with Gestore dei servizi energetici SpA, a public company responsible for that process?

In particular, is that provision of national law compatible with the general principles of EU law relating to legitimate expectation, legal certainty, sincere cooperation and effectiveness, with Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, with Directive 2009/28/EC (1) and with the rules governing support schemes laid down in that directive, and with Article 216(2) TFEU, in particular in relation to the European Energy Charter Treaty?

---

(1)  Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ 2009 L 140, p. 16).

---
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 19.




---



##### 



a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 10, 2005
 /s/ John J. LimbertJohn J. LimbertPresident andChief Executive Officer
 20.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF MARKET AMERICA, INC. AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                      13,580,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,113,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,793,486
<PP&E>                                         809,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,966   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,373,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,452,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,997,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,373,687
<SALES>                                     15,498,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,640,926
<CGS>                                        2,755,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,806,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,079,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,245,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,834,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,834,054
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Community National Bancorporation (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, each of the undersigned officers of the of the Registrant hereby
certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Registrant.

Date:  April 14, 2004                  By:/s/Theron G. Reed
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Theron G. Reed
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       By:/s/W. Paul Gephart
                                          -----------------------------
                                          W. Paul Gephart
                                          Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Michael  A.  McManus,  Jr.,  certify  that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MISONIX, INC.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [*** Omitted pursuant to extended
compliance period] for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

(b)  [*** Omitted pursuant to extended compliance period];

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 6, 2004

/s/  Michael A. McManus, Jr.
----------------------------
Michael A. McManus, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       28
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 743 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 743

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 24, 2016.
    Resolved, That (a) at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5055) making appropriations for energy and water development and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.
     (b) During consideration of the bill for amendment--
            (1) each amendment, other than amendments provided for in paragraph 
        (2), shall be debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by 
        the proponent and an opponent;
            (2) no pro forma amendment shall be in order except that the chair 
        and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations or their 
        respective designees may offer up to 10 pro forma amendments each at any 
        point for the purpose of debate; and
            (3) the chair of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
        recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has 
        caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
        designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so 
        printed shall be considered as read.
    (c) When the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a 
recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Section 508 of H.R. 5055 shall be considered to be a spending 
reduction account for purposes of section 3(d) of House Resolution 5.
    Sec. 3.  During consideration of H.R. 5055 pursuant to this resolution, 
section 3304 of Senate Concurrent Resolution 11 shall not apply.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
19749

#### Doe (b. 7/1/93), In re

Affirmed
#### Doe, In Re: Jane (DOB 9/8/75)

18098

1/14/98

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2019025EN.01005401.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/54

---

Action brought on 15 November 2018 — SLL Service v EUIPO — Elfa International (LUMIN8)

(Case T-680/18)

(2019/C 25/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SLL Service GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Schmitt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elfa International AB (Västervik, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark LUMIN8 — International registration designating the European Union No 1 276 543

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 August 2018 in Case R 2752/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### E. J. BURKE, Plaintiff in Error, v. Tom GARDENHIRE and Lula Gardenhire, Defendants in Error.

No. 37476.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 25, 1957.

*1100Roy Frye, Sr., Roy Frye, Jr., Sallisaw, for plaintiff in error.

J. Fred Green, Fred D. Green, W. S. Agent, Sallisaw, for defendants in error.

CORN, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered upon a jury verdict, in the third successive case tried (November 30, 1955) against the defendant at the same term of court. The issues involved were the same as case No. 37,474, Burke v. McKenzie, Okl., 313 P.2d 1090.

Of the jurors empaneled to try the case, over defendant’s objection that the jurors had sat in the previous cases wherein verdicts had been returned against defendant and so were no longer fair and impartial, it appeared that: five jurors had signed verdicts in both previous cases, while the other seven had signed a verdict in one of the other cases.

The decisive question in this appeal has been determined by our decision, in No. 37,474, Burke v. McKenzie. The judgment accordingly is reversed and the- case remanded with directions to grant a new trial.