# jf TreeFree Biomass Solutions Inc.

The Honorable Lisa Jackson, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 

### McKinstrylnno vat/on Center Advancing the future of energy technology 210 South Hudson Street, Suite 328 Seattle, Washington 98134 Office: (206) 246-6277 www.treefreebiomasssolutions.com

c_) - r191=ri cli C) " ___

Co 

### iJ —

C)

RE: 40 CFR Part 80; RIN 2060-ARO7; 77 FR 700; 77 FR 462; and 77 FR 13009; Dear Honorable Jackson, My purpose in communicating with you is that my company is seeking advice / help / direction on insuring EPA and other government officials and decision makers have the opportunity to consider updated, scientifically based information before ruling on proposed rule 77 FR 4620. We can provide accurate and broad based scientific information concerning the proposed energy crop "Arundo donax", common name "Giant Reed". Our information strongly supports expanding the energy crop list (a new pathway) to include Arundo donax. Based on the intent expressed in Executive Order 13112 concerning "invasive species", decision makers are directed to "consider" the "good" benefits as weighed against the "potential harm" in determining if a plant is eligible for use in government funded projects. Many of the negative comments that the EPA has received has also mentioned the Executive Order and this "weighing" of "good and bad" prior to making a final determination. Our Company has spent over 14 years studying Arundo donax. Equally important, we have spent 14 years studying the impact on our Nation's national security, economic, and domestic welfare issues if we fail to successfully meet the challenge of discovering safe pathways to energy independence, carbon sequestration, the balance of import and exporting trade, the rejuvenation of our Nation's industrial and manufacturing sectors as well as the economic welfare of our Nation's farmers. In our opinion, these issues are part of the broader scope of analysis intended by Executive Order 13112. In reading the many negative comments and letters submitted to the EPA and other governmental departments about the EPA's action last February to expand the energy crop list to include Arundo donax, we see no such "broad" viewpoint and/or analysis even though most of these communications actually mention Executive Order 13112.We see a very narrow and one way position supported by a reference to "200 scientists." Yet, if you remove

the negative comments and letters that make references to "wetlands", riparian", waterways, rivers and streams there would be no significant negative opposition at all to the EPA's expanded action. We believe this recognition is extremely vital to an honest and intended effort to meet the mandate of Executive Order 13112. These "scientists" have not considered or know of the fact that almost every nursery in the Nation sells an ornamental species of Arundo donax, and has been doing so for decades. Yet, this distribution has not resulted in any known harm or danger. Our impression from reading the negative comments and letters that support the negative outlook on Arundo donax is that most of these "scientists" seem to think that Arundo donax somehow "escaped" from somewhere and made its way to the riparian, wetlands, rivers and streams of where 99% of the "wild" growth Arundo donax is located today. However, this is not the case. Arundo donax was actually planted in these wetlands, riparian areas, and on the banks of rivers and streams as a soil erosion measure. The US territories that contain over 99% of the uncontrolled growth of Arundo donax were once owned by Spanish

# I Mexican interests. We believe that in these areas Arundo donax (also known as Spanish Cane and Carrizo) were intentionally planted there as soil erosion measure because this was a successful application in Spain and later throughout Europe. However, European rivers are mostly deep banked, have swift currents, and are seldom without water flow all year round and because of their high banks, seldom if ever flood. These features made using Arundo donax as a soil erosion measure safe and practical. Rivers and streams in the California and other territories where Arundo was planted are unlike the European rivers. They are very shallow in some parts, have low banks, and during part of the hot season become completely void of water flow, then during the rainy season because of their low banks, have annual flooding. These ecological characteristics made the use of Arundo donax as a soil erosion measure a disasterl
After these territories / States became part of the United States, the population grew, especially in Southern California, "water" became a big issue; water for farming and to quench the thirst of a fast growing population base. The Army Corp of Engineers came up with the answer, "let's widen the river beds to get more flow". So the river banks of many streams and rivers feeding Southern California, starting up as high as Sacramento, were bulldozed and widened. At that time, the Army Corp of Engineers knew very little about Arundo donax. The combination of widening the waterways and annual flooding are the two major factors that caused the uncontrolled growth of Arundo donax in these areas. As watersheds and other agencies began funding the "eradication" of Arundo, business entities discovered the lucrative business of bidding on "removal projects" even though they did not scientifically know how to remove Arundo without it coming back year after year. Bill Tidwell, now a retired Orange County manger developed and successfully employed methods that permanently eradicated inappropriate stands without any regrowth. Mr. Tidwell has served a consultant for our Company for over 13 years. The eradicators were using safe herbicides immediately after cutting down the growth only to see the growth come back. Mr. Tidwell was one of the first people who recognized that herbicide should not be used until after a cut stalk gave rise to a new "shoot". It is at this time that the plant is "taking in" its nutrients to continue growing. Applying herbicide at this point results in the plant "drawing in" the herbicide down to its roots and permanently killing the plant roots. Thanks to Mr. Tidwell's discovery, 95% of the "invasive" growth in the Orange County has been eradicated. Over the past 14 years our Company has worked with Washington State University, the University of Washington, Auburn University, the University of Delaware, North Carolina State University and numerous 2 EPA Proposed Rule Responsescientitic laboratories. We invested in planting Arundo plots at Auburn University and at the agricultural

research center at Prosser, Washington operated by Washington State University. Almost every professor and scientist that has become familiar with Arundo donax has declared it to be the "miracle" plant. The plant earned this title because of the following attributes:
1. Produces an amazing range of yields reaching up to 60 tons per acre depending upon climate; 2. Is a perennial plant that need only be planted once in a lifetime; 3. Is very drought resistant; 4. Grows on marginal land rather than compete with food crop farmland; 5. Sequesters carbon at a rate 15 times greater than Douglas fir trees; 6. Can be irrigated with brackish water; 7. Arundo donax has phytoremediation qualities with respect to air, water, and soil, like no other plant in the world. This could have great positive impact on America's brownfields and superfund sites. 8. Arundo contains a unique source of sugars and chemicals; 9. Its' fiber is a perfect alternative to fiber from trees and in most cases is a superior fiber than fiber from trees, capable of being used in existing facilities and mills without modification. 10. Arundo is a very strong crop once established and history has shown that it is not disturbed by hurricanes and other such foil weather conditions. 11. Arundo could be planted at the low point of America's farmlands and actually "filter" out the toxins from the use of fertilizers thereby preventing further pollution of waterways. When these attributes of Arundo donax are properly translated in regards to the impact on our Nation's ability to meet the challenges mentioned above, which sum up to national security as these attributes allow us to meet the challenge of energy independence as well as the rejuvenation of our Nation's economic welfare, please see a report titled "BIOMASS AS FEEDSTOCK FOR A BIOENERGY AND BIOPRODUCTS INDUSTRY: THE TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY OF A BILLION-TON ANNUAL SUPPLY", a report organized by the USDA and the DOE; and when the cause and cure of the wild Arundo growth in California and other territories are fully understood, there will be no doubt that Arundo donax is a safe plant and should be on the official energy crop list! Currently we have 14 year old test plots at Auburn University that provide documented evidence that Arundo by nature is not invasive, as the invasive weeds and plants that have been used in the many comment letters such as the references to Arundo being 'kudzu like". This is scientifically incorrect. Arundo does not seed, and does not spread like Kudzu. Additionally, by the trained personnel, Arundo can be killed in a short 30 day period while it takes up to 10 years to kill Kudzu. We have been developing a proposal to the EPA, DOE, DOD, and Homeland security to help fund a project to actually remove the 250,000 acres or less acres thereby eliminating all of this concern about Arundo's invasiveness. Complete removal could be achieved within five (5) years. If the estimate of 250,000 acres is correct, it is possible that over 5,000,000 tons of biomass could be available and used to jump start several green biotech efforts to produce biofuels, clean coal, and several other products which are currently being produced utilizing fiber from trees and/or that are in need of feed stocks. We have already identified over 30 biotech and biomass users who would economically participate with such a removal effort. Additionally the concern of the 200 scientists could also be turned into a positive action plan to help with such a removal project. It is estimated that Arundo was planted here in the US over several hundred years ago, yet today there is only 250,000 thousand acres of unwanted growth. These facts alone should indicate that Arundo is

EPA Proposed Rule Responsenot in the same category as Kudzu and the other invasive species that are mention in the objection letters

submitted by the concerned scientists. The removal project could also create approximately 1,000 jobs and generate approximately $250 million to help finance such a project. The statement that eradication of Arundo costs $25,000 per acre is just not correct. Many watersheds districts and Counties have been victimized by profit seeking business concerns taking advantage of the lack of accurate information and science by these funding agencies. It is also sad that these funding agencies have funded the removal of the same areas over and over for years due to the lack of know-how and upon occasion, the ill-intent of business concerns winning bid awards. Our Company has been eradicating Arundo between a range of $450 - $5,000 per acre depending upon terrain conditions and whether or not machinery could be utilized. The utilization of Arundo as an energy / biotech feedstock would also be a win win situation for America's farmers and solve many of the ailments surrounding our farming industry. With a payment to farmers of $20 per ton of growth, America's farmers could enjoy an income stream of approximately $600 to $800 per acre with no annual planting, herbicide, fertilizer, transportation, crop insurance and harvesting costs. Arundo plantations do not require rotation. Additionally farmers could use marginal land which may not he capable of producing income from other crop use. In the 14 years that we have been working with scientists, Universities, and laboratories, we have successfully developed "green" and safe solutions for 10 verticals, including biofuel and energy. We have discovered companies like Rico Reeds that have planted and properly maintained 50 year old Arundo plantations which have not moved or escaped from their original planting boundaries. The rest of the world, Europe, India and China, has now discovered the "champion of biomass" as stated by the EU, if we allow for "bad" science to halt or handicap the use of this "miracle" plant with such handicaps such as un-necessary bonding requirements, America will fall way behind the "8 ball" in regards to carbon sequestration, energy independence, and the rejuvenation of America's industrial and manufacturing economies. The Administration's goal of establishing a "green economy", reaching energy independence and job creation will be severability handicapped with the use of Arundo donax. We request that you lead us in developing the proper plan and way to share our information with the proper decisions makers concerning this vital issue and we remain available to submit evidence of the claims we state herein.

Eulysses B. Lewis, President TreeFree Biomass SoIutons, Inc.

EPA Proposed Rule Response

### 'I AUBURN UNIVERSITY AGRONOMY AND SOILS DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE 

### Two whom it may concern This letter is to summarize my research experience with growing Giant Reed (Arundo donax) 

### for multiple uses over the last 14 years, with special reference to its yield, carbon sequestration and invasivity. By way of introduction, I have spent 25 

### years conducting research with numerous potential cellulosic biomass/energy crops, including switchgrass, and 14 years with Giant Reed. My work with Giant Reed has been focused on both its potential benefits as a biomass crop for multiple uses, including liquid fuels, electricity, pulp and paper, and pharmaceuticals, and its potential to become invasive in the eastern United States. These studies have involved detailed scientific research, as well as careful on-the-ground surveys and observations. Unfortunately. much of the information available on Giant Reed has been posted on the internet, but most of this information has absolutely no scientific basis at all, and much of it is not correct. Even federal agencies are guilty of providing seriously misleading information. For example, the USDA has published a map with a title of 'Distribution: Arundo donax' http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=ARDO4 which suggests that over half of the United States is invaded by Giant Reed. Of course. this amounts to extreme exaggeration. A more scientific approach would be to place a dot on the map for the location of each acre occupied by unwanted Giant Reed. If this were done. the reader would find it difficult to find where Giant Reed is located, except perhaps for along the Rio Grande and in Southern California.

I have recorded the biomass yield of Giant Reed from small research plots (about half an acre) for 13 years at the Auburn University E. V. Smith Research and Extension Center in south-central Alabama. Results have recently been analyzed and included in a PhD dissertation. Specifically, average biomass yield for switchgrass was 10.46 dry tons/acre/year, while that of Giant Reed was 15.79 

### dry tons/acre/year. some 51% 

### higher. In addition. Giant Reed received no fertilizer during this time, while switchgrass had to be fertilized with nitrogen, and the quoted yields were achieved with no irrigation. Finally, drought conditions in Alabama during 2000 and 2007 were among the worst on record. but they had virtually no negative impact on biomass yield of Giant Reed, while yields of corn in most of the state were so low that the crop was not worth harvesting. Clearly, this result demonstrates the exceptional drought tolerance of Giant Reed. Since biomass yield and the need for fertilization are the most important factors that determine profitability of a biomass crop for farmers. our results show that Giant Reed is substantially superior to switchgrass, which is the 'model' biomass crop chosen by the US Department of Energy. Carbon Sequestration Soil carbon sequestration is critically important for two primary reasons: it reduces greenhouse gases, thus mitigating climate change, and it substantially improves the productivity of soils by increasing water holding capacity and the ability to retain plant nutrients. Our research showed that Giant Reed sequestered 22.4 tons of carbon/acre in the soil, which was 8 times (800%) that sequestered by switchgrass. In addition, soil content of the key plant nutrients, phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), were increased by Giant Reed, but these nutrients were depleted by switchgrass.

### Invasivity and Fire

It is true that Giant Reed has colonized riparian areas along the Rio Grande and in southern California. However, this is due to the total lack of management, and the fact that these watersheds are very different from those in the eastern United States. In particular, they are essentially in desert regions where the native vegetation is not competitive, and the rivers in question flood for a few months each year, seriously excavating their banks. and then subside to no more than a trickle for the rest of the year. When banks are excavated, Giant Reed that should never have been planted there, is also excavated and spread out downstream where it forms new colonies. In contrast, our rivers in the eastern United States are perennial, with a steady flow of water year-round. and are lined with highly competitive woody vegetation. Therefore, even though Giant Reed has been widely grown as an ornamental in the eastern United States for well over a century, there is absolutely no evidence at all of it becoming invasive in this region. I believe that the main reason for this is that Giant Reed does not grow well in shade, and therefore is not competitive with our forests in the east, including those that occupy riparian areas. Fourteen years of experience with multiple research plots of Giant Reed that are up to 30 acres in size, indicates that plants in these plots have not moved at all. While this is largely due to competition from native vegetation, it is also because the plant is sterile, producing no fertile seed. In addition, unlike bamboo that produces long (up to 20 ft) underground rhizomes, Giant Reed rhizomes are very short and continue to die off as new ones are produced, thus eliminating the possibility of spreading. Therefore, its potential to become invasive is almost zero, provided it is properly managed. Furthermore, based on our experience, it can be eradicated easily by plowing and application of Roundup. Claims are also made that Giant Reed is a fire hazard. This may be the case in the West at certain times of the year when it is dry, but it is definitely not true for the East. We have specifically tried to burn our Giant Reed research plots in Alabama, to avoid having to cut them by hand, but our repeated attempts to set them alight with blow torches have totally failed.

In conclusion: I) there is absolutely no evidence that Giant Reed is invasive in the eastern United States; 2) even in the western states, if it is planted away from riparian areas and properly managed, the risk of it becoming invasive is close to zero; 3) it can be easily eradicated; and 3) it can play a major positive role in carbon sequestration, reclamation of disturbed sites such as surface mines, being used to produce electricity, liquid fuels or pharmaceuticals, and providing much needed income for farmers. Results and observations from research on Giant Reed conducted by colleagues at Virginia Tech and USDA at Tifton, GA, are consistent with ours in Alabama. In short, this plant could play a major role in advancing the emerging biofuel and bioproduct industries which promise to provide jobs, improve rural economies and enhance the environment - more so than switchgrass or miscanthus. Therefore, in my opinion, it would be a disservice to the United States to deny this plant the same opportunity as switchgrass to contribute positively to our future. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (334) 844-3935 or bransdi@auburn.edu if you need more information.

David I. Bransby Professor, Energy Crops and BioenergyArundo donax - Weed to Crop

Good morning to all. My name is Bill Tidwell and I know a thing or two about Arundo. But first let me introduce myself. My credentials:

• Pioneered first successful control of Arundo in Southern California in 1988.

• Founding member and past president of Team Arundo in Southern California.

• I have removed and controlled more Arundo than any man alive on the planet.

• MS degree (Environmental Studies, CSUF), BS degree (biology), BS degree (social ecology, UCI)

• Environmental topics teacher for 34 years at college level (ethics, habitat restoration, native plants, environmental internship, ecology, endangered species, etc.)

• Initiated, developed and implemented a habitat restoration program in Galapagos Islands.

• Speaker for Restoring the Earth Conference 1988 in Berekely, Ca. My topic was artichoke thistle control in California native grasslands. That was my first weed control project. It was the first successful control of that weed species in California.

• Park Ranger in Orange County for 13 years.

• Vegetation control specialist and County arborist for Orange County for 21 years.

• Founding member and past president of Trees Society in Orange County.

• Founding member and past president of Pesticide Applicators Professional Assoc.

• ISA certified Arborist, Pest Control Advisor, Qualified Applicator license, C-24 Landscape license

• USMC platoon Sgt. Viet Nam era. My observations about Arundo:

• I have video footage of Arundo donax stands in 1938 in Santa Ana River.

• I have personal knowledge that Arundo was introduced for flood control by region farmers and it was plowed when the cane became large.

• Arundo produces no viable seed in the Orange County region.

• Arundo is only reproduced by asexual cuttings of the root and outer edge stems of the clump.

• Arundo does not send out a 'runner' from the root clump. It forms a nodule on the root clump.

• Arundo will not grow in deep water. It grows at water edges and in alluvial deposits in arroyo riparian settings.

• Arundo will not grow without an ample supply of water.

• Arundo has no insect attacks or diseases in the Orange County region.

• Arundo occupied large areas of riparian habitat in Santa Ana River because it was planted and then dispersed by plowing in an alluvial plain with a tremendous supply of nitrogen fertilizer from the dairy farms in Chino basin.

• Once controlled reintroduction is slow, native plants reclaim the habitat, and small clumps of Arundo can come back in only after a disturbance (flood scouring action). Vigilant control of those small clumps prevents reinvasion.• I can show you a large area that has been recovered and is still under control from the Prado dam to the Pacific Ocean in the Santa Ana River.

• The endangered bird species 'Least Bell's Vireo' has increased from 2 nesting pairs to over 146 nesting pairs since Arundo was controlled. That species has benefited from the removal.

• I am currently working today to remove Arundo from yet another watershed in Orange County.

• My original vision was to remove all Arundo from Orange County property in the Santa Ana and San Juan rivers. That goal is now 99.5 % complete.

• My vision has now expanded to remove all the Arundo from all watersheds in Orange County, California, and the entire United States. This is doable. I can show you how. It's already been done. I have done it and it has been replicated by others.

• The biomass from Arundo is larger than any other terrestrial plant known. The removed biomass can be utilized for multiple purposes.

• Biomass for paper and building materials will reduce the pressure on today's old growth forest and allow that habitat type to remain intact for endangered species such as the Spotted Owl.

• Biomass for energy will reduce the CO2 increase currently being added daily by the use of fossil fuels. Arundo is carbon neutral and is in balance the atmosphere of today. This fuel will take the form of a coal substitute, ethanol production increase, biodiesel, and gasoline. This will directly affect energy independence of the United States.

• Arundo for pharmaceuticals to produce organic insecticides to protect food crops without damaging other ecosystems.

• Arundo is controllable in a crop situation just as sugar cane, corn or wheat. All are grass species and are of benefit to humans. Arundo has many uses and will be a paradigm shift in favor of the environment while preserving our current and future lifestyle.

• I teach and live an environmental ethic. This plant can solve many of the problems we face today. My students we recognized from my environmental internship for putting in more than 60, 000 hours of time in the Orange County regional Parks. That time was used for habitat restoration and Arundo removal. I talk the talk and walk the walk. If I thought for one moment that Arundo was uncontrollable in an agricultural crop setting I would be the first in line to kill it. Wait I was the first in line to kill it! I also know it has been and can be controlled. I see the big picture. This more than just helping out the 'Least Bell's Vireo'. This can work for the whole Earth. I see it. I hope others can too. Please call me at 949-533-2117 if you would like to talk or visit the recovered site. B t$iOMAS OLUT*ONS WC.



### TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This letter is in response to the claims that planting Arundo donax ("Arundo ", 

### commercially for biofuel and other uses poses a significant risk of spreading as occurred in California and Texas. Over the last 7 years we have intensely surveyed available information to uncover reliable, scientific and substantiated facts to base our conclusion that Arundo 

### is not invasive. Any other rhizome based plant handled in a manner similar to Arundo 

### would result in similar instances of invasiveness. The risks described extensively over the internet and in various publications focus exclusively on nparian areas. Commercial enterprises cultivated Arundo 

### for decades without incident. Right in California, the epicenter of invasiveness information regarding Arundo, 

### Rico Reed's 80 acre commercial Arundo 

### plantation was not plagued by escaping plants for over 50 years. Many who have actually grown and studied Arundo 

### across the globe and in various US states clearly verify that Arundo 

### is biologically incapable of aggressive spreading when planted in appropriate locations and employing a minimum of crop hygiene. Arundo 

### did not invade California it was inadvertently propagated. This crop has the potential to provide energy needed by all the biotechnologies we rely on to defeat global warming and our dependence on fossil energy. Based on a complicated series of circumstances and reliance on recycled, narrow and incomplete misinformation the use of the only economically viable biomass crop available is in jeopardy. Before you take any action to block this rule I implore you to consider the following: Incomplete, outdated, misinformation dominate internet - Unfortunately the well-documented reports" of invasiveness all seem to be part of a closed loop of recycled information quoted from one source to another and back again. Government, quasi-government and reputable environmental sites lend credibility to reports found in their materials and on public information websites. While a portion of the information is accurate it does not tell the whole story. When Arundo 

### was primarily used for erosion control, windbreaks and landscape ornamentation, the stakes were not high enough to expend the effort to correct the misperception as aggressively invasive. The most visible information on Arundo 

### does not describe Arundo 's 

### normal naturalization when planted and managed in appropriate locations. Arundo 's 

### reputation as an aggressively invasive species is based on studies exclusively focused on riparian habitats where human "cultivation" and "mismanagement" created the problem. Arundo is incapable of spreading due to its sterile nature, dense clumping and slow rhizome expansion. The internet is flooded with information on the damage Arundo 

### causes 'once established." What is either left out entirely or its impact minimized are adequate references to just how it got "established" in the first place. Studies going back decades by respected scientists verify that Arundo 

### is now and has been commercially cultivated for decades without incident. It is hard to understand why this information is not considered when evaluating the risk Arundo 

### actually poses. Delete riparian, riverbanks, rivers, streams from invasive reports and see what is left of the risk. How California inadvertently created such a problem. After use for erosion control without incident for hundreds and hundreds of years Californians changed how they interacted with the Arundo 

### planted along waterways, and in riparian areas to stem erosion. With the objective of widening canals to accommodate increased flows the Army Corp of Engineers used bulldozers to knock stalks down, drove over them embedding them in mud while pushing chopped pieces into the river as they widened the canals.

### Presumptions rather than facts have driven the creation of the problem and impeded efforts to eradicate and

control Arundo. 

### The problem didn't arrive so much from misunderstanding the information on Arundo 

### as it did from not understanding it in a changing context. This has resulted in making the problem worse in California. A multimillion dollar industry sprang up to eradicate Arundo. Government entities pay millions of dollars to purchase ineffective methods to eradicate Arundo although there are proven strategies that really work when applied appropriately. Commercially available as an ornamental plant in nurseries - Arundo is available for purchase as an ornamental plant in commercial nurseries across the US and has been for over 30 years. It has not spread as much as other species such as Kudzu which is frequently mentioned in reports on Arundo. 

### Spanning several decades and across the globe you can easily find examples proving the ability to commercially grow, harvest and remove acres of Arundo 

### without incident. Does not fit invasive definition in Executive Order 13112 - The available verifiable facts do not support defining Arundo 

### as an invasive species under Executive Order 13112 or the Invasive Species Definition Clarification & Guidance White Paper. Passes the invasive species balancing test - Using the invasive species balance test set out in the above references Arundo 

### 's benefits greatly exceed the ecological costs. Arundo 

### meets or exceeds all of the characteristics of an ideal biomass crop described in the National Biofuel Plan. BPs recent abandonment of its biomass program illustrates the challenges. Arundo 

### addresses the four fundamental criteria BP says are required for a biofuel: it is sustainable and scalable, it provides substantial carbon savings, and it is capable of becoming competitive with crude oil over time without dependence on subsidies. High Yields per acre make Arundo 

### one of our best options as an economically feasible biomass crop. Without Arundo 

### the likelihood of the US reaching its cellulosic and advanced biofuels goals using currently available biomass crops are dismal. Biomass feedstock for a wide variety of major industries - Unlike suspect species that provide little or no benefit Arundo 

### has applications as a biomass feedstock for the pulp and paper, forage, composite materials, green coal, chemicals and green plastics industries with more coming as research continues. It is proving to be a versatile, environmentally friendly plant with properties that improve the environment on many fronts. New technologies provide growers a quick and economical method to propagate scalable quantities up to millions of acres. There is substantial information in existence today drawing from experienced growers, historical records and scientific fact based studies to conclude that it is against public policy to block A rundo. Arundo 

### will prove to be one of the most environmentally significant plants on the planet. Several countries are far ahead of us in embracing Arundo 

### and using it as a major biomass crop. Arundo is 

### essential in any biofuel plan implemented to reduce energy dependency. Whether we get on board at the present time or not - we will eventually. For the sake of brevity and due to the short notice we did not include the references supporting the statements we make in this letter. We are happy to send them under separate cover if you are interested in reviewing them.

Annette Mouton Corporate Counsel

# Flat Rate Mailing Envelope For Domestic and International Use Visit us at usps.com

UNITED STATES POSTAL SEP VICEA 

### Post Off iceTo Addressee

Time 

### Li AM Employee Signature

Li PM 0 2nd0 2nd Dci. Ore Scteduled Date ot Debvery Return Receipt Fee 

### E AM 

## fl riM Ernploye

.c.g.ature

Scheduled Time ot Delivery P0 ZIP Code

Da Accepted

Intl Alpha Country Code I]WAIVER OF SIGNATURE (Domestic Mail Duty) Additional merchandise insurance is void it Customer requests waiver of signature. Iwish delivery lobe made without obtaining signature of addressee or addressees agent (it delivery employee judges that article carr be left ri secure location) arid I authonze that delivery employee's signature constitutes aalid proot ot delivery Time Accepted 0 AM

Flat Rate 0 Weight
lbs. ozs. AcceptanS'E Etials

PLEASE PRESS FIRMLY



### Mailing Label Label il-B, March 2004

PAYMENT BY ACCOUNT Express Mail Corporate Acct. No Federal Agency Acct. No. or Postal Service Acct, No. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

NO DELIVERY Ewnekeed Holiday Mailer Signalore s-Iea.ae iiuSfl 10 MOUitu

FROM: IPLEASE PRIN'Tt PHONE I



# 6..m^rs5.,1^·t.u..^.G^ ^.. 0 s.,0 

## ^T^-^f N 3.28 

# us, EPA l20 ^I c..usy /

uo.u ·c-AUciNm,NW 

# w,4sh.vIt.N,DC 20460

ZIP o 4 (U.S. ADDRESSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR FOREIGN P011*1.. CODES.)

FOR INTERNATIONAL DESTINATIONS, WRITE COUNTRY NAME BELOW