alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         133,900
<SECURITIES>                                    64,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,700
<PP&E>                                         861,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 985,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,500
<BONDS>                                        436,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     392,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   985,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John E. Bailye, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Dendrite International, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 9, 2004  

 

 
| /s/ John E. Bailye                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John E. Bailye                                     |
| Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

----
18662

#### State v. Puailihau

Affirmed
Order entered May 7 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 005 63 - CV No. 05 - 13 - 00564 - CV IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON , Relator On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . W 10 - 01183 - J , W10 - 01184 - J 

### O RDER Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition s for writ of mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of th e original proceeding s . /s/ LANA MYERS JUS TICE
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas A. Murdock, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K/A  (Amendment  No. 1) of
     Fonix Corporation;

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report; and

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.


Date:    December 13, 2002



/s/ Thomas A. Murdock
------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Murdock
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

<PAGE>


I, Roger D. Dudley, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K/A  (Amendment  No. 1) of
     Fonix Corporation;

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report; and

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.


Date:      December 13, 2002


/s/ Roger D. Dudley
-------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Dudley
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### State v. Mataka

16909

12/23/94

Granted

- Hawai'i -, - P.2d -
Understanding the Federally 

Recognized State Managed 

Phytosanitary Program 

(FRSMP or ‘Freestamp’)
Objective

At the end of this presentation, you will 

recognize the general characteristics and 

purpose of the FRSMP Program
“The active enforcement of mandatory 

phytosanitary regulations and the applications 

of mandatory phytosanitary procedures with the 

objective of eradication or containment of 

quarantine pests or for the management of 

regulated non-quarantine pests”.

Official Control is a term defined by the International 

Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) as: 

3
FRSMP builds on the IPPC concept of Official 

Control

• States manage a harmonized program that PPQ will 

recognize and oversee

• PPQ defines the phytosanitary objectives of containment and 

eradication 

• PPQ also recognizes exclusion from endangered areas as a 

possible objective 
• To ensure PPQ policies, programs, and risk analyses are 

consistent with IPPC concepts that the United States and our 

trading partners recognize

• To create a mechanism for State-managed programs to be 

officially recognized by APHIS as provided by the IPPC

• To avoid challenges by trading partners to our import 

requirements 

Why does PPQ want to implement FRSMP?
• PPQ consults with State Plant Regulatory Officials 

(SPROs) about pests that are most unlikely to be 

regulated because they are widely distributed and/or not 

feasible to control

• 143 pests have been deregulated at ports of entry through 

March 2024. 

How is PPQ resolving the pests awaiting a decision for 

state management?
PPQ has created a process to recognize statemanaged control programs

State Plant Regulatory Officials (SPROs) will be able to

• Collaborate among themselves on common pests

• Design a program and petition PPQ for recognition

When PPQ recognizes a state managed program, 

SPROs will: 

• Establish a quarantine

• Meet PPQ’s reporting requirements 
• Absence or limited distribution 

• Pathway(s) and likelihood of introduction

• Potential economic/environmental harm

• Details of a regulatory program, including 

phytosanitary regulations 

8

What will states be required to submit in their 

petition?
• FRSMP is a program that targets recognized state 

regulated pests at US ports of entry 

• APHIS will review and accept or reject petitions by 

states for participation in the program 

• APHIS will monitor these programs with periodic 

audit

9

How will FRSMP affect AQI activities
#### First Hawaiian Bank v. Familian Northwest, Inc.

18372

7/17/97

Vacated and Remanded
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0031. OSPREY COVE REAL ESTATE, LLC v. TOWERVIEW CONSTRUCTION, 

L.L.C..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV89
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 27,
1998 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000
       
<S>                               <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                                     203
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           21,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                             34,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        60,117
<PP&E>                                                   9,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         112,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   35,871
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                    65
<OTHER-SE>                                              63,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           112,880
<SALES>                                                 42,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        42,279
<CGS>                                                   25,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           25,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        18,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       1,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (4,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (4,097)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (4,097)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.63)
        



</TABLE>
#### State v. Mason

19475

5/15/97

Remanded and Affirmed
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

			
	Certificate	  	                    
Shares                    
	No. B-    	  	

 Incorporated in the State of Delaware 

February 28, 1985 
  





 
 SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK 

(i) (See the reverse of this certificate for information on how to obtain a copy of the 

rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of each class or series of shares) 

THIS CERTIFIES that
                                        
is the record holder of                      shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of CytRx Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, transferable only on the share register of the corporation, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned. 

This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the
Bylaws of the corporation and any amendments thereto, to all of which the holder of this certificate by acceptance hereby assents. 
 WITNESS the signatures
of its duly authorized officers this     th day of     , 201    . 

 

					
	  
	 		 	  

	Steven A. Kriegsman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	 		 	Cara Birardi, Secretary








 THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS,
PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE MADE TO THE OFFICE OF
THE CORPORATION AT ITS PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OFFICE.
FY2016 HPAI Response

Mortality Composting: 

Carbon Sources for Windrow Construction

May 9, 2016

Construction demolition debris

Wood chips with rocks/gravel

Oat hulls Chopped corn stover

Please note: These procedures may be revised as the situation develops; this is a list of generally acceptable carbon 

sources for windrow composting of HPAI related mortalities. The carbon source resource needs for the premises, i.e. 

quantity and type, should be determined by a compost Subject Matter Expert and will depend on site-specific (typically 

poultry house-specific) conditions and circumstances.

Suitable carbon sources:

 Wood chips about 2” or less in size

 Wood shavings

 Yard/brush trimmings 2” or less in 

size

 Partially composted leaf and yard 

waste (still hot)

 Sawdust (not used alone)

 Chopped hay/straw

 Chopped corn stover

 Oat/Sunflower hulls

 Dry mammalian manure

 Ground pallets (2” or less) if 

fasteners have been removed

 Class A Biosolids, in accordance 

with local and state requirements for 

land application 

 Other material listed in APHIS 

Composting Protocol or as 

recommended by APHIS-recognized 

Subject Matter Expert and approved 

for use on agricultural land by the 

state

Materials not suitable within a carbon 

source:

 Rocks

 Glass

 Plastic

 Large logs/branches

 Grass clippings >5%

 Ground construction and demolition

debris (CDD)

 Regulated pests (Emerald ash borer, 

etc.)

 Rubber

 Metal/baling wire

 Chemicals

 Concrete

 Painted/pressure treated wood

 Soil/sand

 Carbon source with free liquid or 

excessive leachate

Mulch from yard trimmings/waste

Wood chips

Mixed wood with logs/large lumber pieces
# C_2019093EN.01005801.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/58

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — Inforsacom Logicalis v EUIPO (Business and technology working as one)

(Case T-7/18) (1)

(((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Business and technology working as one - Trade mark consisting in an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 93/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Inforsacom Logicalis GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2017 (Case R 808/2017-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Business and technology working as one as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Inforsacom Logicalis GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Inforsacom Logicalis GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 26.2.2018.

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

● ●

★

●

● ●

●
October 10, 2000

22578

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 949 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 949

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2028) making appropriations for energy 
and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2016, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 
House concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment consisting of the text of 
Rules Committee Print 114-70 modified by the amendment printed in the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and 
the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (S. 612) to designate the Federal building and United 
States courthouse located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the 
``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States Courthouse''. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature 
of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114-69 shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by the 
respective chairs and ranking minority members of the Committees on Energy and 
Commerce, Natural Resources, and Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# ANTONELLI

Drone/UAS Practice Group

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 

# LAW 35 E Wacker Drive Suite 1875 Chicago, IL 60601 Tel. 312.201.8310 Jcffrev((i;Antonelli-Law.com**·---·--~--** October 19,2015

Re: Amendment to NWB Environmental Services, LLC's Petition for Exemption. Regulatory DocketNo. FAA-2015-4286-0001. Dear Sir or Madam: We are writing regarding the address ofour client, NWB Environmental Services, LLC ("NWB"). When we had filed theirpetition, NWB hadbeen located at 3033 5th Avenue, Suite 227, San Diego, CA 92103. They have since moved, and are now located in Suite 210 at the same address. The full address ofour client is now: NWB Environmental Services, LLC 3033 5th Avenue, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92103. We requestthat you update NWB'sPetitionfor Exemption, under DocketNo. FAA-2015- 4286-0001, to reflect NWB's newlocation. Ifwe can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312- 201-8310 or via email at Jeffrev(a)Antonelli-Law.com.

Attorneys for NWB Enviro



### 1
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementsand Related Prospectuses (Forms S-3 No. 333-84402, No. 333-42245; and Forms S-8 No. 333-95282, No. 333-3438, No. 333-26135, No. 333-44281, No. 333-50679, No. 333-76991, No. 333-33944, No. 333-56800, No. 333-84404, No. 333-101378 and No. 333-115494)of our report dated October 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2004. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

San Jose, California 

December 13, 2004