alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00256-CR

____________________

IN RE WILLIAM DURHAM

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

William Durham petitioned for a writ of mandamus, in which he asks that 

the court compel the District Clerk of Liberty County, Texas to process his 

application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See generally Tex. Code 

Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West 2015). The petition does not invoke this Court’s 

mandamus jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (A court 

of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus against a judge of a district or county 

court in the court’s district, or issue a writ that is necessary to enforce the 

jurisdiction of the court.); see also Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 

392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (instructing that the Texas Court of 
2

Criminal Appeals possesses sole authority to grant relief in a post-conviction 

habeas corpus proceeding filed in state court). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition 

for writ of mandamus. 

PETITION DISMISSED.

 

 PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 14, 2015

Opinion Delivered July 15, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
JAMIE DANIELLE MINOR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4033

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 19, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Jamie Danielle Minor, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 1, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 27 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-92, CP2024-94.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26834 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 16-03

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron Rippke

Director 

SUBJECT: Veterinary Biologics Containing Senecavirus A

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this notice is to inform interested parties that the Center for 

Veterinary Biologics (CVB) is accepting veterinary biologics product license and 

permit applications for veterinary biological products used in the prevention, 

diagnosis, and treatment of Senecavirus A (SVA) also known as Seneca Valley 

Virus (SVV).

II. BACKGROUND

SVA is a non-enveloped single-stranded RNA virus of the family Picornaviridae of 

which Foot and Mouth Disease Virus and Swine Vesicular Disease Virus are also 

members. SVA is an emerging pathogen causing blister-like lesions on the mouth, 

snout, or hooves in susceptible swine, indistinguishable from reportable vesicular 

Foreign Animal Diseases. Recent case reports in the U.S. and Brazil have identified 

SVA as the cause of high mortality in piglets less than seven days of age.

III. ACTION (or POLICY)

Interested parties should refer to Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I,

Subchapter E; Veterinary Services (VS) Memorandum 800.50, Basic License 

Requirements and Guidelines for Submission of Materials in Support of Licensure; 

VS Memorandum 800.101, U.S. Veterinary Biological Product Permits for 

Distribution and Sale; and VS Memorandum 800.73, General Guidance for Test Kits 

Intended for the Diagnosis of Animal Diseases. This information is available on the 

CVB website: 

www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/cvb_regsandguidance

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY

Applications and supporting materials should be submitted to the CVB-Policy, 

Evaluation, and Licensing for review. Licenses or permits for test kits that detect 

antigen will contain distribution restrictions.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 564 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the symbols and 

traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who celebrate Christmas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2015 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. GOODLATTE, 

Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. FLORES, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. WALKER, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

WENSTRUP, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. 

COLE, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. BARR, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. 

ROKITA, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. HARPER, 

Mr. ALLEN, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, and Mr. YOHO) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the symbols and traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who celebrate Christmas. 

Whereas Christmas is a national holiday celebrated on December 25; and 

Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment of 

the Constitution, in prohibiting the establishment of reliVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:07 Dec 11, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR564.IH HR564

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 564 IH 

gion, would not prohibit any mention of religion or reference to God in civic dialog: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the symbols and tra3 ditions of Christmas; 

4 (2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban ref5 erences to Christmas; and 

6 (3) expresses support for the use of these symbols 

7 and traditions by those who celebrate Christmas. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
May 19, 1997

19092

#### O'Connor v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co./Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.

Vacated
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      16,342,000                       0
<SECURITIES>                                14,154,000                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,135,000                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,432,000                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            77,891,000                       0
<PP&E>                                      44,592,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                            (20,865,000)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             232,160,000                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,603,000                       0
<BONDS>                                     20,053,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        11,000                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 133,571,000                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               232,160,000                       0
<SALES>                                     82,531,000             162,409,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,531,000             162,409,000
<CGS>                                       59,836,000             119,777,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               59,836,000             119,777,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,148,000              29,722,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             493,000                 987,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,380,000              12,474,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,123,000               5,364,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,257,000               7,110,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,257,000               7,110,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37                    0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37                    0.62


</TABLE>
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

January 28, 2021

Attention U.S. pet owners and others involved in the international movement of 

pets:

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS) is the competent government 

authority responsible for international export of live animals, including pets such as 

dogs and cats, leaving the United States and traveling to a foreign country. It is APHIS 

VS’ role to provide endorsement (review and countersignature) of international health 

certificates after issuance by a USDA Accredited Veterinarian when required by an 

importing foreign country.

Please be advised that some importing foreign countries will now accept digital 

(electronic) signatures for the issuance and/or endorsement of international health 

certificates for live animals, including pets. The APHIS Pet Travel Website 

(www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/pettravel) should be consulted to determine the importing 

foreign country’s requirements, including whether digital signatures are accepted, and to 

obtain the appropriate international health certificate. 

For importing foreign countries that accept digital endorsement, the health certificate 

will have digital signatures instead of traditional pen-and-ink signatures, and the USDA 

seal will be printed on the certificate instead of a raised embossed seal. For importing 

foreign countries that do not accept digital endorsement, the health certificate will still 

have pen-and-ink signatures and an embossed USDA seal. At time of endorsement, 

APHIS VS is responsible for verifying if the importing foreign country accepts digital

signatures. As a result, all APHIS VS-endorsed health certificates will be in the 

signature format accepted by the importing foreign country.

In addition to the international health certificate required by the importing foreign 

country, some airlines require pets to travel with an additional health certificate issued 

by a licensed veterinarian stating the pet is fit to travel. Since APHIS VS only reviews 

and endorses documentation required by the importing foreign country, APHIS VS will 

not endorse any health certificates required solely by an airline. This information was 

communicated to the airlines in June 2016.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact your local

APHIS VS Office. Contact information can be found on the APHIS Pet Travel Website

(www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/pettravel). Thank you in advance for your attention to and 

assistance with this matter.

Respectfully,

Amber Headen, DVM

Director of Live Animal Exports

USDA APHIS Veterinary Services

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

4700 River Rd

Unit 39

Riverdale, MD 20737
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 21, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-213886) of Smart Trust 286,
comprising Smart Trust, Portfolio of Closed-End Fund Opportunities Trust, Series 11.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 21, 2016
Exhibit 31.01




CERTIFICATION




I, Patrick W. Cavanagh, certify that:




1.  I have reviewed
this report on Form 10-K of Williams Controls Inc.;




2.  Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and




c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:




a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.


|Date: December 7, 2005 |  | /s/ PATRICK W. CAVANAGH Patrick W. Cavanagh Chief
Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

---
24936

#### State v. Soon

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

APHIS Issues Regulatory Status

Review Responses

Print

Media Contact: 

Rick Coker

(301) 851-4091

richard.s.coker@usda.gov

 WASHINGTON, December 21, 2023 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) recently reviewed four plants

modified using genetic engineering to determine whether they posed an increased

plant pest risk as relative to non-modified comparators: 

BioHeuris, modified cotton and modified soybean for herbicide resistance.

PlantArcBio, modified soybean for herbicide resistance.

Bayer Crop Science, modified corn for herbicide resistance. 

APHIS found these modified plants were unlikely to pose an increased plant pest risk

compared to other cultivated plants. As a result, they are not subject to regulation

under 7 CFR part 340. From a plant pest risk perspective, these modified plants may

be safely grown and bred in the United States. 

View the RSR Table
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Grid Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 30, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Grid Alliance, Inc. 
(``OGA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Quintecon, Inc., Mountain View, CA, has been added as a 
party to this venture.
    Also, Crown Castle Fiber LLC, Houston, TX; and DartPoints Operating 
Company LLC, Greenville, SC, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OGA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 31, 2022, OGA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 
2022 (87 FR 29180).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 16, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on August 23, 2023 (88 FR 57478).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27591 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John PENROD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-1431.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Oct. 3, 2005.

George A. Norwood, Office of the United States Attorney, Benton, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Michael J. Gonring, Quarles & Brady, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BAUER, COFFEY and MANION, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

John Penrod challenged his 384-month total sentence for dealing crack based on the Supreme Court’s decision in *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), contending that the district court committed plain error by applying the sentencing guidelines in a mandatory fashion. We issued a limited remand pursuant to *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir. 2005), to allow the district judge an opportunity to consider whether he would impose the same sentence with the knowledge that the guidelines are not mandatory.

The district court responded that if given the opportunity it would “reimpose the same sentence.” Penrod’s sentence is within a properly calculated range under the guidelines, and is therefore presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Penrod argues however, that his sentence is nonetheless too long because with advancing age (he is 39) and drug treatment his likelihood of recidivism will decrease. He also contends that 384 months is unreasonable relative to the sentences given to his coconspirators and relative to defendants who distribute powder cocaine rather than crack. But the district court was aware of but unmoved by these contentions because of Penrod’s “horrendous” criminal history and “lack of remorse.” We find that the district court adequately considered the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), particularly the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant. Accordingly, the sentence is not unreasonable, and the judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.35

            DESCRIPTION OF RETIREMENT ACCOUNT MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS

         MicroTel International Inc. matches up to the lesser of $2,000 and 20%
of Randolph Foote's contributions to his 401(k) account. During 2003, those
matching contribution amounted to $1,864. This matching arrangement was
generally made available to all employees of MicroTel International Inc. and
provides for the same method of allocation of benefits between management and
non-management participants.

         Also, XCEL Power Systems, Ltd. makes matching contributions of up to 6%
of Graham Jefferies' salary to an executives' defined contribution plan. Other
employees of XCEL Power Systems, Ltd. may receive matching contributions to a
defined contribution plan of up to 4% of their salary. Amounts contributed to
the defined contribution plans are intended to used to purchase annuities upon
retirement. During 2003, Mr. Jefferies received a matching contribution of
$10,320.