alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020103EN.01002502.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Mutondo v Council

(Case T-174/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality)

(2020/C 103/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kalev Mutondo (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, S. Lejeune and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Kalev Mutondo to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Kalev Mutondo to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
# C_2021062EN.01000501.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2020 — BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

(Case C-601/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew - New decision adopted following an annulment by the General Court - Irregularities allegedly committed during the implementation of the General Court judgment)

(2021/C 62/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: BP (represented by: E. Lazar, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders BP to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BP to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 23.12.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTO OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I, A. Mark Young,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ A. Mark Young
-----------------------------------
A. Mark Young
Chief Financial Officer
December 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,475,728
<SECURITIES>                                 9,518,938
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,185,804
<PP&E>                                         422,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,607,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          741,884
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    44,976,784
<OTHER-SE>                                (34,068,706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,607,984
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               412,765
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,598,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,464,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,650,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,650,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,650,739)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)


</TABLE>
18209

#### Sattler v. Hicks

February 11, 1997

Order No. 97-13

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 
  

			
	



	 	ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
	 	DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE
	 	  
 SECTION A: CONTRACT AMENDMENT


  

							
	 1.      AMENDMENT #
	 	 2.      CONTRACT #:
	  	 3.      EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT:
	 	 4.      PROGRAM

				
	13	 	YH14-0001-07	  	April 14, 2016	 	DHCM - ACUTE
	
	 5.      CONTRACTOR NAME AND
ADDRESS:


 Health Choice Arizona 

410 N. 44th Street, Suite 900 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 
  

	6.	PURPOSE: To allow for payment of rural hospital inpatient reimbursement pursuant to A.R.S. §36-2905.02. 

  

	7.	THE ABOVE REFERENCED CONTRACT IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 

 The Contractor will be paid the
attached supplemental payment amounts to increase rural hospital inpatient reimbursement. The supplemental payment amounts are allocated to the appropriate risk groups based on historical utilization. AHCCCS requires that the Contractor make
one-time payments to each rural hospital as prescribed on the attached schedule, pursuant to A.R.S. §36-2905.02, to increase inpatient reimbursement to these small rural hospitals. 

The Contractor shall make the prescribed payments to the rural hospitals 15 days from receipt of the funds and submit proof of payment to the
rural hospitals to the Finance Manager of the Division of Health Care Management 30 days from receipt of the funds. 
 The regular per member
per month capitation rates for the period of October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016 remain unchanged unless otherwise modified by contract amendment. 
  

	8.	EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT NOT HERETOFORE CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL EFFECT. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO SIGN THEIR NAMES IN AGREEMENT 

 

							
	 9.      SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:
	  	 10.    SIGNATURE OF AHCCCS CONTRACTING OFFICER:

	  
 




	  	  
 





			
	TYPED NAME:	 		  	TYPED NAME:
	MIKE UCHRIN	  	MEGGAN HARLEY
		
	TITLE:	  	TITLE:
	CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER	  	PROCUREMENT MANAGER
		
	DATE:	  	DATE:
	3/11/16	  	2/25/2016


  
 1
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 838 

Expressing support for designation of April 11 as ‘‘National Pet Adoption 

Day’’ and the month of April as ‘‘National Pet Adoption Month’’ to 

highlight the important role pets play in the lives of United States 

citizens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2016 

Mr. WILLIAMS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of April 11 as ‘‘National 

Pet Adoption Day’’ and the month of April as ‘‘National 

Pet Adoption Month’’ to highlight the important role 

pets play in the lives of United States citizens. 

Whereas April 11 would be an appropriate date to designate 

as ‘‘National Pet Adoption Day’’; and 

Whereas the month of April would be an appropriate month 

to designate as ‘‘National Pet Adoption Month’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Pet 

3 Adoption Day’’ and ‘‘National Pet Adoption Month’’ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 838 IH 

1 to highlight the important role pets play in the lives 

2 of United States citizens; 

3 (2) requests that the President issue a procla4 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe ‘‘National Pet Adoption Day’’ and ‘‘Na6 tional Pet Adoption Month’’ with appropriate cere7 monies and activities; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to adopt pets from local animal shelters and rescues. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
# C_2020329EN.01000201.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020 — European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo

(Case C-114/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Open competition - Non-admission to tests - Possible for the administration to supplement before the Court the statement of reasons for the decision not to admit - Conditions - Exceptional cases - Concept of ‘absence of a statement of reasons’)

(2020/C 329/02)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Danilo Di Bernardo (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
Manager, Flight Standards Service

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office FAA Headquarters, Building 10A 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 11376 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015
- 0072) Attention: FAA UAS Intergration Office This is a request for an amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 11376 to add additional aircraft to Texas UAV Professionals authorized c ommercial operations. On April 17 , 2015, the FAA granted this Pet ition for Exemption to operate small unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of conducting inspections for utility and construction industries . The Petitioner now seeks an amendment to its exemption authorizing the operation of additional aircraft as des cribed in the confidential and proprietary operations manuals submitted in support of this amendment request. Additional Aircraft: TUP X8A
- 2100
- Manual sent separately to 333exemptions@faa.gov TUP’s existing safety standards, maintenance, operational parameters and procedures outlined in our Manual will continue for the additional aircraft. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you shoul d have any questions. Best regards, Curtis Youngblood Texas UAV Professionals 5205 Sycamore Hills Court College Station, TX 77845 979
- 828
-4269 Curtis@texa sdroneprofessionals.com
# C_2018166EN.01004701.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/47

---

Action brought on 27 March 2018 — Brita v EUIPO (Shape of tap for preparing and dispensing beverages)

(Case T-213/18)

(2018/C 166/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brita GmbH (Taunusstein, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU tridimensional mark in black and white (Shape of tap for preparing and dispensing beverages) — Application for registration No 16 053 068

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 January 2018 in Case R 1864/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order to accept the European Union Trademark Application no. 16 053 068 in relation to all the goods and services applied for in classes 7, 11, 21, 37 and 40; |
| --- | --- |

—

order to accept the European Union Trademark Application no. 16 053 068 in relation to all the goods and services applied for in classes 7, 11, 21, 37 and 40;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and the fees and costs of BRITA GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and the fees and costs of BRITA GmbH.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000880458
<NAME> RETIX
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           3,244
<SECURITIES>                                     6,935
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,250<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,480
<INVENTORY>                                      1,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,777<F2>
<PP&E>                                           1,098<F3>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           227
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,970<F4>
<SALES>                                         18,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,607
<CGS>                                            5,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,728<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (89)<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
<FN>
<F1> IS NET OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2> INCLUDES PREPAID AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS OF $978
<F3> IS NET OF DEPRECIATION
<F4> INCLUDES $84 OF LONG TERM OBLIGATIONS
<F5> INCLUDES OPERATING EXPENSES OF $20,971
<F6> INCLUDES INTEREST INCOME, NET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
July 14, 1986 

VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO. 800.77 

Subject: Unsatisfactory Product Stability 

To: Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants 

 Director, National Veterinary Services Laboratories 

 Directors, VS Regions 

 Biologics Specialists, VS 

 Area Veterinarians in Charge, VS 

I. PURPOSE 

The purpose of this memorandum is to describe policies and procedures to 

assure appropriate action when tests by Veterinary Services reveal that a 

product may not be efficacious throughout the expiration dating period. 

II. BACKGROUND 

The regulations in Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (9 CFR), Part 101, 

Paragraph 101.4(f), and Part 114, Section 114.13, provide for establishment 

and confirmation of a date designating the end of the period during which a 

biological product, when properly stored and handled, can be expected with 

reasonable certainty, to be efficacious. Veterinary Services may find it 

necessary to take corrective action when stability test results at National 

Veterinary Services Laboratories are unsatisfactory. 

III. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 

A. Test rate 

1. Prerelease testing will ordinarily have priority over 

stability testing. 

2. Routine stability tests will be started within the last month 

of dating. 

3. An increase in the stability test rate will be initiated for 

products found unsatisfactory. 

B. Test Reports 

Licensees and permittees will be promptly notified of the results of each 

test using a National Veterinary Services Laboratories Biologics Test Report. 

C. Regulatory actions 

1. The Veterinary Biologics Field Office will initiate all 

regulatory actions and make all notifications regarding unsatisfactory 

stability tests. 
Veterinary Services Memorandum No. 800.77 2 

 

2. If three serials (or 20 percent of the serials produced) in a 

12-month period are found unsatisfactory for potency within the dating 

period, the following will apply: 

a. The licensee or permittee may continue to use the 

authorized dating period with the provision that each serial or 

subserial be tested at mid-dating and at the end of the dating 

period. The results of each test must be promptly reported to 

Veterinary Services on a VS Form 14-8, Veterinary Biologics 

Production and Test Report. 

b. Any serial found unsatisfactory at mid-dating must be 

promptly removed from the market. 

c. In lieu of testing at mid-dating, the licensee or 

permittee may reduce the dating period by one-half. 

3. The requirement for mid-dating retest or reduced dating will 

be rescinded if the licensee or permittee demonstrates that eight 

consecutive serials are satisfactory when tested for potency at the end 

of the original dating period and the results are confirmed by 

Veterinary Services on at least four of the serials. Initiation of 

confirmatory tests by Veterinary Services may extend past the 

expiration date of the serial. If a reduced dating period is 

requested, an outline page revision supported by data specified in 

9 CFR 114.13 will be required. 

 /s/ 

J. K. Atwell 

Deputy Administrator 

Veterinary Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   152     
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     152     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       163,188
<OTHER-SE>                                    (149,104)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       152    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
# C_2021079EN.01001102.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Lexel AB v Skatteverket

(Case C-484/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Corporation tax - Taxation of associated companies - National tax legislation prohibiting a company which is established in one Member State from deducting interest paid to a company established in another Member State, belonging to the same group of companies, in the case where a substantial tax benefit is gained)

(2021/C 79/13)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lexel AB

Defendant: Skatteverket

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that a company established in one Member State is not permitted to deduct interest payments made to a company belonging to the same group, established in another Member State, on the ground that the principal reason for the debt linking them appears to be the obtaining of a substantial tax benefit, whereas such a tax benefit would not have been deemed to exist if both companies had been established in the first Member State, as in that situation they would have been covered by the provisions on intra-group financial transfers.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.

---