88112 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 

Affiliated Imports, LLC, 13326 

Immanuel Road, Pflugerville, TX 

78660–8006 

American Vape Company, LLC a/k/a 

American, Vapor Company, LLC, 

13326 Immanuel Road, Pflugerville, 

TX 78660–8006 

Breeze Smoke, LLC, 4654 Lilly Court, 

West Bloomfield, MI 48323 

Dongguan (Shenzhen) Shikai 

Technology Co., Ltd., L5 Block A 

Shuangjinhui, Tongfuyu Fuyong, 

Baoan Shenzhen, Guangdong China 

518101 

EVO Brands, LLC, 251 Little Falls Drive, 

Wilmington, DE 19808 

Flawless Vape Shop Inc., 1021 E 

Orangethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, CA 

92801 

Flawless Vape Wholesale & Distribution 

Inc., 1021 E Orangethorpe Avenue, 

Anaheim, CA 92801 

Guangdong Qisitech Co., Ltd., Fuxing 

Road, Changan Town, Room 201, 

Building 3, No. 36, Dongguan City, 

Guangdong Province, China 523000 

iMiracle (Shenzhen) Technology Co. 

Ltd., Room 1203, Block 1, Wanting 

Building, Xixiang Substrict, Bao’an 

District, Shenzhen, China 518126 

Magellan Technology Inc., 2225 

Kenmore Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14207 

Pastel Cartel, LLC, 13326 Immanuel 

Road, Pflugerville, TX 78660–8006 

Price Point Distributors Inc. d/b/a 

Prince Point NY, 500 Smith Street, 

Farmingdale, NY 11735 

PVG2, LLC, 251 Little Falls Drive, 

Wilmington, DE 19808 

Shenzhen Daosen Vaping Technology 

Co., Ltd., #501, Building B1, Quanzhi 

Zhihui Park, Ligang S. Road., Shajin 

Street, Bao’an Dist., Shenzhen, China 

518104 

Shenzhen Fumot Technology Co., Ltd., 

A2907, Building A Longguan Jiuzuan 

Business, Center, Minzhi Longhua, 

Shenzhen, China, 518000 

Shenzhen Funyin Electronic Co., Ltd., 

205 and 401, Building A3, Fuyan Ind. 

Zone, Tangwei Community, Fuhai St., 

Bao’an Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, 

China 518000 

Shenzhen Han Technology Co., Ltd., 

Qianwan Hard Technology Park, 

Baoan, District, Shenzhen, 

Guangdong, China 518126 

Shenzhen Innokin Technology Co., Ltd., 

Building 6, XinXinTian Industrial 

Park, Xinsha Road, Shajing, Baoan 

District, Shenzhen China 518104 

Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd., 

101 Building B8, No. 2, Cengayo 

Industrial Area, Yuluv Community, 

Yutang Subdistrict, Guangming 

District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 

518001 

Shenzhen Noriyang Technology Co., 

Ltd., Room 303, Building A, 

Zhonghengsheng High-Tech Park, 

Xinyu Road, Shajing Town, Baoan 

District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 

Province, China 518104 

Shenzhen Weiboli Technology Co. Ltd., 

Room 312, Tianshuzuo, No. 6099 

Bao’an Avenue, Bao’an District, 

Shenzhen, China 518000 

SV3 LLC d/b/a Mi-One Brands, 4908 E 

McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85008 

Thesy, LLC d/b/a Element Vape, 10620 

Hickson Street, El Monte, CA 91731 

Vapeonly Technology Co. Ltd., Room 

306–311, Tianshu Building, No. 6099, 

Bao’an Avenue, Bao’an District, 

Shenzhen, China 518000 

VICA Trading Inc. d/b/a Vapesourcing, 

3045 Edinger Avenue, Tustin, CA 

92780 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(5) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainants of 

the complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 15, 2023. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2023–27996 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1336] 

Certain Semiconductor Devices, 

Mobile Services Contacting the Same, 

and Components Thereof; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not to 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate 

the Investigation Due to Settlement; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 78) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) granting a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation due to 

settlement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3115. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 19, 2022, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Daedalus 

Prime LLC (‘‘Daedalus’’ or 

‘‘Complainant’’) of Bronxville, New 

York. 87 FR 63524–25 (Oct. 19, 2022). 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain semiconductor 

devices, mobile devices containing the 

same, and components thereof by reason 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 88113 

of the infringement of certain claims of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 9,831,306 (‘‘the ’306 

patent’’); 10,319,812 (‘‘the ’812 patent’’); 

10,700,178; and 11,251,281. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon-si, 

Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 

Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 

(collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’); Taiwan 

Semiconductor Manufacturing 

Company Limited of Hsinchu City, 

Taiwan and TSMC North America of 

San Jose, California (collectively, 

‘‘TSMC’’). The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party in 

this investigation. 

Subsequently, the investigation was 

terminated with respect to the ’306 and 

the ’812 patents. Order No. 35 (June 9, 

2023), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(July 10, 2023). Furthermore, the ALJ 

granted Complainant’s motion for 

summary determination that the TSMC 

respondents are not licensed to the 

asserted patents. Order No. 49 (July 17, 

2023), reviewed and, on review, vacated 

in part and affirmed in part with 

modified reasoning by Comm’n Notice 

(August 23, 2023). Also, the 

investigation was terminated with 

respect to the Samsung respondents. 

Order No. 52 (August 7, 2023), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Sep. 5, 

2023). 

On October 18, 2023, Daedalus and 

the TSMC respondents (Daedalus and 

TSMC together, the ‘‘Moving Parties’’) 

filed a joint motion to, inter alia, 

terminate the investigation based on 

settlement. (‘‘Mot.’’). On October 24, 

2023, OUII filed a response supporting 

the motion. (‘‘Staff Resp.’’). 

On November 14, 2023, the ALJ 

issued an ID (Order No. 78) granting the 

joint motion. The ID noted that, 

consistent with Commission Rule 

210.21(b)(1), Daedalus and TSMC attach 

a copy of a Settlement and Patent 

License Agreement, a Patent Purchase 

Agreement, and two binding Term 

Sheets as Exhibits 1–4 to their motion. 

ID at 2. The ID further noted that, in 

addition, pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.21(b)(1), the motion states that 

‘‘[t]here are no other agreements, written 

or oral, express or implied, between 

Daedalus and TSMC concerning the 

subject matter of this Investigation.’’ Id. 

(citing Mot. at 2). 

The ID further noted that Daedalus 

and TSMC submit that termination 

‘‘will not adversely affect the public 

interest’’ and that ‘‘[t]ermination will 

also conserve Commission resources, 

including those of the Administrative 

Law Judge and the Commission 

Investigative Staff, as well as those of 

the Moving Parties.’’ Id. (citing Mot. at 

2–3). The ID noted that in its response 

to the Moving Parties’ motion to 

terminate, OUII states that ‘‘Staff is not 

aware of any reason why termination of 

this investigation on the basis of the 

Agreements would be contrary to the 

public health and welfare, competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, the 

production of like or directly 

competitive articles in the United 

States, or U.S. consumers[ ]’’ and that 

‘‘the public interest favors settlement to 

avoid unnecessary litigation and to 

conserve public and private resources.’’ 

Id. (citing Staff Resp. at 4). The ID found 

no evidence of any adverse impact on 

the public interest from the termination 

of the investigation and granted the 

motion thus terminating the 

investigation. Id. at 2–3. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. The investigation is 

hereby terminated. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on December 

14, 2023. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 14, 2023. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2023–27897 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–0220] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension of a 

Previously Approved Collection; 

Bureau of Justice Assistance 

Application Form: Public Safety 

Officers Educational Assistance 

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Assistance, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, 

Department of Justice (DOJ), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until 

February 20, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Hope D. Janke, Director, Public Safety 

Officers’ Benefits Office, Bureau of 

Justice Assistance, Office of Justice 

Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 

810 7th Street NW, Washington, DC 

20531, telephone: (202) 307–2858, or 

email: hope.d.janke@usdoj.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Abstract: BJA’s Public Safety Officers’ 

Benefits (PSOB) Office will use the 

PSOEA Application information to 

confirm the eligibility of applicants to 

receive PSOEA benefits. Eligibility is 

dependent on several factors, including 

the applicant, as a spouse or child, 

having received or being eligible to 

receive a portion of the PSOB Death 

Benefit, or having a spouse or parent 

who received the PSOB Disability 

Benefit. Also considered are the 

applicant’s age and the schools being 

attended. In addition, information to 

help BJA identify an individual is 

collected, such as contact numbers and 

email addresses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Public Safety Officers’ Educational 

Assistance (PSOEA). 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1