alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018319EN.01002001.xml

| 10.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/20

---

Action brought on 12 July 2018 — McDreams Hotel v EUIPO — McDonald’s International Property (mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis!)

(Case T-428/18)

(2018/C 319/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: McDreams Hotel GmbH (Feldkirchen, Germany) (represented by: S. Schenk, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd (Wilmington, Delaware, United States).

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis! — Application for registration No 1 47 35 435

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 April 2018 in Case R 972/2017-2.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to bear the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the applicant’s costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Art. 8(1)(b) and Art. 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Art. 8(1)(b) and Art. 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0456 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANTHONY SCOTT CHARLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 1 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 9 2024

08/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0456
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 31, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00910

- CV

S. J., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
BEFORE CH IEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTIC ES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order and decre e of termination signed by the tr i a l court on November

20, 20 19

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was

no reversible error in the trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s orde r

.

Because appellant is indig ent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerI, Paula J. Meiler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
21.

 
CSB BANCORP, INC. a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2005     /s/ Paula J. Meiler     Paula J. Meiler  Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
22.
April 2021

There were 9 surveillance inspections conducted at 9 different sites for a total of 50

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to increase in response to the 

warmer air temperatures. All sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and 

were scheduled for monthly sampling. Routine harvest continued and spring stocking 

began. No cages were confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

May 2020 50 0 23100

June 2020 80 0 23180

July 2020 56 0 23236

August 2020 50 0 23286

September 2020 50 0 23336

October 2020 45 0 23381

November 2020 35 0 23416

December 2020 45 0 23461

January 2021 45 0 23506

February 2021 45 0 23551

March 2021 46 0 23597

April 2021 50 0 23647
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 914 

Expressing support for designation of September 2016 as ‘‘Pulmonary 

Fibrosis Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. COHEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of September 2016 as 

‘‘Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas pulmonary fibrosis is a debilitating and ultimately 

fatal condition that causes progressive scarring in the 

lungs and generally has no known definitive cause; 

Whereas, as many as 200,000 individuals in the United 

States are known to suffer from pulmonary fibrosis, the 

majority of whom are between the ages of 50 and 75; 

Whereas the average survival rate for the idiopathic form of 

pulmonary fibrosis is just 2.8 years and up to 80 percent 

of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients die within 5 

years of diagnosis; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 914 IH 

Whereas pulmonary fibrosis takes the lives of 40,000 individuals in the United States each year, approximately 1 

death every 13 minutes; 

Whereas many patients with pulmonary fibrosis are 

misdiagnosed for 1 year or longer after the patients are 

presenting with pulmonary fibrosis symptoms; 

Whereas, as of September 2016, there are no biomarkers for 

screening and testing for pulmonary fibrosis; 

Whereas a cure or drug that is effective for all pulmonary fibrosis patients that would extend life or universally improve symptoms does not exist; 

Whereas the symptoms of pulmonary fibrosis vary from person to person and include shortness of breath, a dry 

cough, fatigue, weight loss, and aching muscles and 

joints; 

Whereas volunteers, researchers, caregivers, and medical professionals are working to improve the quality of life for 

individuals with pulmonary fibrosis and the families of 

those individuals; and 

Whereas developing more effective treatments for pulmonary 

fibrosis and providing access to quality care to individuals 

with pulmonary fibrosis requires increased research, education, and community support services: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Pulmonary Fi3 brosis Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Pulmonary 

5 Fibrosis Awareness Month; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 914 IH 

1 (3) continues to support more robust and accel2 erated research to develop more effective treatments 

3 for pulmonary fibrosis and to ultimately find a cure 

4 for the disease; 

5 (4) recognizes the courage and contributions of 

6 individuals with pulmonary fibrosis who participate 

7 in vital clinical trials to advance the knowledge of 

8 the disease; and 

9 (5) commends the dedication of organizations, 

10 volunteers, researchers, and millions of individuals in 

11 the United States and abroad working to improve 

12 the quality of life for individuals with pulmonary fi13 brosis and the families of those individuals. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Carl WALKER, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A—12511.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 2, 1957.

*625Clayton Carder, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Carl Walker, defendant below, was charged by information in the County Court of Kiowa County, Oklahoma, with the offense of operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, said, offense allegedly committed on the 20th day of December, 1956. He was tried by a jury, convicted, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of ten days. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The defendant was observed driving his automobile approximately one and one-half miles south of Snyder, Kiowa County, Oklahoma, by Roy Eakins, Deputy Sheriff of Tillman County, Oklahoma. He was driving in the direction of Snyder and Deputy Eakins saw him weaving from side to side across the road and off the highway several times. He arrested the defendant and held him for the Sheriff of Kiowa County, whom he notified by means of his automobile radio. Eakins searched the defendant’s automobile and found a small quantity of whiskey remaining in a bottle under the seat.

Deputy Sheriff Killingsworth of Kiowa County testified that he answered the call and went to the scene of the violation and there observed the defendant. So also did Sheriff E. O. Peters of Kiowa County who was in Snyder at the time of the alleged offense. These three officers testified the defendant talked in a silly manner, was unsteady and staggered on his feet, and all declared him to be intoxicated.

The defendant offered no testimony in his own behalf. The record clearly supports the jury’s finding of guilt. It is axiomatic that conflicting evidence presents a question for the sole determination of the jury, and where there is any evidence in the record reasonably tending to support the jury’s finding, the same will not be vacated, reversed, or set aside on appeal.

Affirmed.

POWELL and NIX, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         112,232                 112,232
<SECURITIES>                                    65,371                  65,371
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,539                  19,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900                     900
<INVENTORY>                                     10,234                  10,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,686                 211,686
<PP&E>                                          47,692                  47,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,235                  24,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,190                 242,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,213                  15,213
<BONDS>                                            226                     226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       258,280                 258,280
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,529)                (31,529)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,190                 242,190
<SALES>                                         24,562                  46,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,562                  46,394
<CGS>                                           10,833                  20,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,020                  34,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    83                      76
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36                     134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,645                  15,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                       863                   1,530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,782                  13,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,782                  13,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20                    0.37
        

</TABLE>
February 27, 1998

19685

#### State v. Aragon

Affirmed
Order entered August 20, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00817
- CV
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIV E SERVICES, Appellant
V. CARLOTTA HOWARD, Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 13467 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 13, 2013 motion for stay of proceedings and appellee’s August 19, 2013 response to that motion. We DENY the motion to stay.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Wagatsuma v. Patch

16037

9/16/94

Denied

— Haw.App. -, 879 P.2d 572
~ . RULE 206. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT 

OR PERMIT TO OPERATE : 

The Control Officer may issue an Authority to Construct 

or Permit to Operate, subject tospecified written conditions 

which will bring the operation of any machine, article, 

equipment or other contrivance within the standards of Rule 

205. Commencing operation under such a Permit to Operate 

shall be deemed acceptance of all the specifiedconditions. 

The Control Officer shall issue a Permit to Operate with 

revised conditions upon receipt of a new application, if the 

applicant demonstrates that the article, machine, equipment 

or other contrivance.s can operate within the standards of 

Rule 205 under the revised conditions. 

RULE 207.DENIAL OF APPLICATIONS . 

In the event of denial of an Authority to Construct or 

Permit to Operate, the Control Officer shall notify the 

applicant in writing of the reasons therefor. Service of 

this notification may be made in person or my mail, and 

such service may be proved by the written acknowledgment 

of the persons served or affidavit of the person making the 

service. The Control Officer shall not accept a further 

application unless the applicant has complied with the objections specified by him as his reasons for denial of the 

Authority to Construct or the Permit to Operate. 

(
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT
OF
EXABYTE CORPORATION

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 2004

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Exabyte Corporation ("Exabyte").  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the 10-K/A Report of Exabyte for the year ended January 3, 2004.

We certify that such 10-K/A Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K/A Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exabyte.

This Certification is executed as of May 3, 2004.

/s/  TOM W. WARD



/s/  CARROLL A. WALLACE			Carroll A. Wallace
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERREQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)AND SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002, 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of
Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick W. Cavanagh, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
  Company.

/s/ PATRICK W.
CAVANAGHPatrick W. CavanaghChief
Executive OfficerWilliams Controls, IncDecember 14, 2007

75

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 745 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 745

 Congratulating Einstein Healthcare Network on their 150th anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2016

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Payne, Mr. 
Fitzpatrick, Mr. Meehan, Mr. MacArthur, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Norcross, Mr. 
  Costello of Pennsylvania, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   LoBiondo, Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of 
Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Einstein Healthcare Network on their 150th anniversary.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Einstein Healthcare Network on their 
        150th anniversary and recognizes the significance of this 
        milestone; and
            (2) commends Einstein Healthcare Network for their high-
        quality medical care services to the people of Philadelphia and 
        the surrounding region.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 48 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 27, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 351) to 

provide for expedited approval of exportation of natural gas, 

and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; 

and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Plant Health Contacts

Last Modified: 

Print

Not sure who to contact? We can help!

Select an option from the list below.

I want to...

report a pest or disease, ask about domestic or emergency programs in my

State, or move plants or plant products interstate

get information about pest and disease identifications, quarantine pests, or

pest action policies for ports of entry

ask about biological select agents and toxins that could threaten plant health

ask about Plant Protection Act Section 7721 projects, funding opportunities, and

how to apply

State Plant Health Directors

Contact an APHIS plant health director to report a plant pest or disease in the State

where you found it. Our plant health directors can also answer questions about pest

management and eradication programs in your State and any restrictions on moving

plants or plant products into your State or to another.

- Select a State - ▾
Loading...

National Identification Services

Contact National Identification Services to reach a team of botanists, entomologists,

and others with specialized plant health expertise. As the final taxonomic authority

for APHIS' regulatory programs, this team can answer questions about pest and

disease identifications, quarantine pests, pest action policies for ports of entry, and

more.

National Identification Services Team

Phone: 301-851-2182

Select Agents

APHIS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention jointly manage the

Federal Select Agent Program. APHIS regulates those agents that can cause disease

in plants or animals.

Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins

Email: dasat@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-2070

Fax: 301-734-3652

Website

Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins

Website

Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins

Plant Protection Act Section 7721
APHIS distributes millions of dollars each year to support projects that help protect

U.S. agriculture. Contact our program coordinators for questions about these

projects, current funding opportunities, and how to apply.

For the Plant Pest and Disease Management and Disaster Prevention Program:

Julie Van Meter

Coordinator, Plant Pest and Disease Management and Disaster Prevention Program

Email: julie.vanmeter@usda.gov

For the National Clean Plant Network:

Jennifer Nicholson

Coordinator, National Clean Plant Network

Email: jennifer.s.nicholson@usda.gov

Plant Health Contacts