alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       9,201,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  920,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,550
<INVENTORY>                                    732,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,977,699
<PP&E>                                      14,392,843
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,240,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,542,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,910,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,457
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,322,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,542,382
<SALES>                                      8,565,808
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,452,906
<CGS>                                        6,666,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,986,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,305,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             351,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (838,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (840,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (840,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### Alson Ayoub, an Infant, by John Ayoub, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

November 24, 1958.

*520
      *Kirlin, Campbell & Keating (Thomas B. McLaughlin*of counsel), for appellant.

*Francis L. Giordano*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements. The failure of the owner to have contracted regarding the rights of an injured infant claimant precludes such owner from the protection afforded under the United States Code (tit. 46, § 183b). In any event, a triable issue of fact was raised as to whether the owner had such knowledge of the injury to the infant plaintiff as would have entitled a court to have made a determination as to whether the owner has been prejudiced by the failure of the infant to have given notice as prescribed in said statute. No opinion.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.
UTl"GSYMllOl

co

:;;;~

7,;/u)"

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[4910-13-P)

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

Ainvorthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-9-14, DC-9-15

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

14 CFR Part 39

and DC-9-15F Airplanes; and Mndel DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 Sene

(Docket No. FAA-2010-0705; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-206-AD; Amendme

319~.'t~~D2010_1.~110

R1N 2120-AA64

products listed above. That AD currently requires repetitive high frequency eddy curre OllTlNG SY"OOL

inspections to detect cracking in the vertical radius (also known as the "vertical leg") 0 ''''TIAL.S'~LG

the upper cap of the center wing rear spar, and repair ifnecessary. This new AD expan ATH

the area to be inspected by including inspections to detect cracking of the horizontal "OUT'NG SYMHOL

flange of the upper cap of the left and right center wing rear spar, and repair ifnecessar ~ITIAI.SISIG

This new AD also adds certain airplanes to the applicability. This AD was prompted by IJATE

reports of cracking in the vertical radius of the upper cap of the center wing rear spar, al =,NGSYMBOL

the horizontal flange on the inboard side of the of the rear spar upper cap, which resulte .,r,,,...,,,<>

from stress corrosion. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the

vertical leg or the horizontal flange of the upper cap of the left or right center wing rear '--,ru""""",- 1RolfTl>«i 'YMIlOL

spar, which could cause a possible fuel leak, damage to the wing skin, and structural

failure of the upper cap, and result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
#### State v. Sacro

17022

5/19/95

Affirmed and Remanded
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 823 

Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks in Istanbul, Turkey, 

on June 28, 2016, that resulted in the loss of at least 44 lives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2016 

Ms. FOXX (for herself, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Mr. WHITFIELD) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks in 

Istanbul, Turkey, on June 28, 2016, that resulted in 

the loss of at least 44 lives. 

Whereas, on June 28, 2016, suicide bombers attacked the 

Ataturk International Airport in Istanbul Turkey, opened 

fire and detonated explosives, resulting in the loss of at 

least 44 innocent lives and severely wounding over 200, 

including an American citizen; 

Whereas Turkish first responders and law enforcement reacted swiftly and heroically, caring for the wounded and 

taking immediate actions to prevent subsequent attacks 

and further loss of innocent life; 

Whereas the White House issued a statement condemning the 

attack ‘‘in the strongest possible terms’’ and states that 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 823 IH 

‘‘We remain steadfast in our support for Turkey, our 

NATO Ally and partner, along with all of our friends and 

allies around the world, as we continue to confront the 

threat of terrorism’’; 

Whereas the Government of Turkey has stated militants from 

the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) are responsible for the attack, and this attack resembles those carried out by ISIS in other parts of the world; 

Whereas the loss of innocent lives in Istanbul strengthens our 

shared resolve to defeat ISIS and its terrorist affiliates, 

which pose a growing threat to international peace and 

stability; 

Whereas Turkey is a longstanding member of NATO and has 

played a crucial role in transatlantic security since joining the alliance more than half a century ago; and 

Whereas we stand in solidarity with the people of Turkey in 

their time of national mourning, ready to provide assistance in bringing to justice all those involved with the 

planning and execution of these attacks, as well as identifying and disrupting any plans to undertake similar assaults in the future: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns in the strongest terms the ter3 rorist attacks in Istanbul, Turkey, on June 28, 

4 2016, that resulted in the loss of at least 44 lives; 

5 (2) expresses its condolences to the families and 

6 friends of those individuals who were killed in the 

7 attacks and expresses its sympathies to those indi8 viduals who have been injured; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 823 IH 

1 (3) supports efforts to bring to justice those in2 volved with the planning and execution of these ter3 rorist attacks; and 

4 (4) declares that the Islamic State of Iraq and 

5 Syria (ISIS) poses a fundamental security threat to 

6 the United States and our allies. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
!	
 
"
" # $%&	 ' (

) *+,-./0.1 .2 345+6+5 345+6+578 9 :55

$<KL=M(NO>PQKRS?T
$@@; >?
$@@?ABCBD; *+1,EFG.1E1HIHJ UMRRVLSWMXSQP

YKLXMWQLSKLMNOPQKRSTZ[TSVN ZVTTKMR\KPPV]OKXVKR^^NKR_SVT `a_bQRcd^efgefghiZ`cjch

kVOMXSlKPSVXmnOSKMRToi]KSpMlVQXYMq_PV

rstuvrwxvyzw{|}~xxy}t|}zu}uy}{

ttu|}}y}{y{u}

u|{vy

y}tu}{yx{y{||{{w{

ywxvu|}}}z

ywxuu}{u}u

{ytuv{uu}u 

t

      

p_N¡VXM¢UMNOPQKRSTlKPVq ej he hh h£ c£ ¤

p_N¡VXM¢UMNOPQKRQRST h£ he hh h¥ c£ ¤ kVOVQSlKPVXT ^jjcj j ywxvu|}z¦u

ywxuu}{u}u

{ytuv{uu}u 

t

 § ̈©a«¬ ̈­® ̄°±2©3 ́°2μa¶± ̄a·° ̄ ̄a ̧±2 ̧­1 ̄©±® ̄aμ°3a3o

»1⁄4a31­ ̈¶©1⁄4aμ°3a3­°1⁄22 ̈©a3⁄41° ̄© ̈©° ̄ ́ ̈­® ̄°±2©3¶± ̄a·o      

kQLV ^e ^h ^e cc g ^

UMPMX e c ¤^h c j

kVPK¿KMR ejjge h

kVOXKTQP ce cj ^¤ cj ^e g

ZV] ^£ ^^ ^e ^d ¤ ^

WÀÁ jjjjj j

pQSKMRQPnXK¿KR hee£^ ^

iÂ_QPWQ[ÁLS ^jc^j ^

Á¿V ^c ^^ ^j¥ g j

ÀKTQ¡KPKS[ cj ^¥ ^e ^e ^¤ ¥

ÃVRVSKLT j^^jj j

pMRÄiin ccggg ^

ywxvu|}zt{ ywxuu}{u}u

{ytuv{uu}u 

t

 § ̈©a«¬ ̈­® ̄°±2©3 ́°2μa¶± ̄a·° ̄ ̄a ̧±2 ̧­1 ̄©±® ̄aμ°3a3o

»1⁄4a31­ ̈¶©1⁄4aμ°3a3­°1⁄22 ̈©a3⁄41° ̄© ̈©° ̄ ́ ̈­® ̄°±2©3¶± ̄a·o      

ÁOOMKRSNVRSmÅKXV jcc^j ^

ÁTTK¿RNVRSM¢À_SKVT dhcjj ^

Á\QXqT j^jjj j

U K SlPP`K mW ZSS jjjjj j

OQ¿V

LMXRVX

UMRSVRSÆMq[pQÇK¿QSKMRÈKRÉT

 	   !	
 Ê Ë Ì ÍÎÍ Ì Ï
#### State v. Monroe

17349

5/31/95

Affirmed
# C_2019072EN.01000701.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 13 November 2018 — Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria v SJ

(Case C-705/18)

(2019/C 72/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria

Respondent: SJ

Question referred

Are a provision in a collective agreement and an employer’s practice, pursuant to which, for the purposes of remuneration and promotion, the length of service of a part-time female employee whose working hours are ‘distributed vertically’ over the whole year is to be calculated solely on the basis of time actually worked, contrary to Clause 4(1) and (2) of the Framework Agreement on part-time work [annexed to] Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997, (1) and to Articles 2(1)(b) and 14(1) of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)? (2)

---

(1)  Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1998 L 14, p. 9).

(2)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).

---
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

FAD PReP Industry Manuals

Last Modified: 

Print

Beef Feedlot Industry Manual (July 2011) 

Cow-Calf Industry Manual (Jan 2013) 

Dairy Industry Manual (Mar 2011) 

Swine Industry Manual (Mar 2011) 

Poultry Industry Manual (Mar 2013)
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Equine Disease

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS protects and improves the health, quality, and marketability of our Nation's

equines, equine products, and veterinary biologics. We do that by preventing,

controlling, or eliminating equine diseases and monitoring and promoting equine

health and productivity.

African Horse Sickness 
African horse sickness is a disease of equids (horses, mules, donkeys, and zebras)

that is spread primarily by biting midges.

Contagious Equine Metritis 

Contagious equine metritis is a highly contagious venereal disease of horses that

can be difficult to detect.

Equine Herpesvirus 

Equine herpesvirus is a family of contagious viruses found in horses worldwide.

Three herpesviruses pose a high disease risk to U.S. horses.

Equine Infectious Anemia 

Equine infectious anemia is a viral, and sometimes fatal, disease that only affects

horses, ponies, zebras, mules, and donkeys.

Equine Piroplasmosis 

Equine Piroplasmosis is a blood-borne disease spread by either certain species of

ticks or the use of blood-contaminated equipment between animals.

Equine Viral Arteritis 

Equine viral arteritis is a contagious disease of horses. It can severely impact

breeding and the international movement of horses and semen.

Vector-Borne Equine Encephalitides 

Equine encephalitis viruses (Eastern, Western, and Venezuelan) are spread by

infected mosquitos and can cause severe brain inflammation in horses and people.

Vesicular Stomatitis Virus 

Vesicular stomatitis is a contagious disease of livestock, mainly affecting horses and

cattle with blister-like lesions.

Disease Prevention and Management Programs

National Animal Health Monitoring System Equine Studies
Surveillance Reports: Equine Arbovirus Interactive Dashboard

Latest Updates

2/15/23

Equine Infectious Anemia in Current or Former Quarter Horse Racehorses

2/15/23

Equine Piroplasmosis in Imported Sport Horses

View All Updates
EXHIBIT 23.2



                             Henry Schiffer, C.P.A.
                           An Accountancy Corporation
                          315 Beverly Drive, Suite 211
                        Beverly Hills, California 90212





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report, dated April 19, 2002,
included in this Form 10-KSB/A in the previously filed Registration Statements
of Beechport Capital Corp. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-69494, effective September
17, 2001 and File No. 333-62520, effective June 7, 2001).



/s/  Henry Schiffer, CPA
---------------------------
HENRY SCHIFFER, CPA
An Accountancy Corporation

Beverly Hills, California
May 1, 2002
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.23(b)



                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
            BETWEEN CARY H. THOMPSON AND AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION


        The Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") between Cary H. Thompson (the
"Executive") and Aames Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), to become effective immediately prior to the "Initial Closing Date,"
as such term is defined in the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement by and among
the Company and Capital Z Financial Services Fund II, L.P., dated the 23rd day
of December, 1998, is hereby amended as follows:

        1. Section 3F of the Agreement shall be amended by replacing "2,630,162"
with "2,580,162" in each place that it appears in the Section.

        2. Capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the remaining provisions of the
Agreement, as amended to date, shall remain in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the undersigned duly authorized
officer of the Company have executed and delivered this amendment as of February
10, 1999.


                                            AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                            By: /s/ Barbara S. Polsky
                                                ------------------------------


                                            Cary H. Thompson

                                            /s/  Cary H. Thompson
                                            ----------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10271

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DWAYNE CHANCE CHADWICK,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-48-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dwayne Chance 

Chadwick has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chadwick has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10271 Document: 00512473653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-10271

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-10271 Document: 00512473653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Propagative Material Name

Validation List

Last Modified: 

Print

PPQ has generated the following list of propagative material genus, and subspecies

names (PG05). This list does not represent commodities that may or may not be

admissible, but merely provides the acceptable spellings for genus, species,

subspecies, aphis id number (APID) and the Integrated Taxonomic Information

Systems (IT IS) Taxonomic Serial Number (TSN).

This list is not all encompassing; if the genus or species does not appear on this list,

use the format that appears on the associated phytosanitary certificate and

commercial invoices. PPQ will update the list as necessary and provide the date of

the most recent update. All shipments are subject to review and inspection.

Loading...
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
                      AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Caere Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 22, 1999, included the 
related consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the years in the 
three-year period ended December 31, 1998, included in the annual report on 
Form 10-K. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility 
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
this consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our 
opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in 
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, 
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-35033, 33-49114, 33-32992, 33-66430, 33-81708, 33-87824, 33-81680, 33-60027,
333-02293, 333-10803, 333-30993, 333-31019) on Form S-8 of Caere Corporation of
our reports dated January 22, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Caere Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
and the related schedule, which reports appear or are incorporated by reference
in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Caere Corporation.


Mountain View, California
March 25, 1999
Genesis Lawn and Landscaping LLC

PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST 

ENVIRONMENTAL: 

□ Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity. 

□ Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner of your intentions. 

□ If flying in controlled airspace, notify airspace authority of your intentions. 

□ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible, and visible to anyone in the area 

HARDWARE / EQUIPMENT: 

** VISUALLY INSPECT THE AIRFRAME**

□ Cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints) 

□ Loose or damaged screws / fasteners / bands / straps / ties 

□ Loose or damaged wiring 

□ Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc) 

□ Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened construction 

□ Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated & secured 

□ Remove props and test fail-safe behavior (if applicable) 

□ Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface, & hub)

□ Tighten prop adapters (careful not to over tighten which may damage prop) 

□ Ensure voltage alarm is connected 

□ Ensure arming/idle timeout is properly configured (6-15 seconds is generally acceptable) 

□ Check whether the right model is selected in the transmitter (if applicable)

□ Check your RC transmitter shows the right range and centering for all sticks 

□ If desired, perform range test 

PRE-FLIGHT: 

** POWER UP ** 

□ Batteries charged & secured 

□ Position quad in a level, safe location for takeoff □ If using onboard video 

recorder, turn on camera 

□ All transmitter controls move freely in all directions 

□ All transmitter trims in its neutral position 

□ All transmitter switches in correct position (typically away) 

□ Transmitter throttle to zero 

□ Radio transmitter on 

□ Connect/power on battery to airframe 

□ Ensure led indicators & audible tones are all correct (e.g., GPS and Compass are properly calibrated) 

□ Timer on (if applicable) 

□ Scan for nearby people or animals 

□ Stand clear - audibly, loudly announce the word "CLEAR!" 

□ Arm flight controller 

**PRE TAKEOFF ** 

□ Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities 

□ Short 20-30 second hover at 3-5 feet (listen for any weird vibrations or anything that sounds loose)