alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018301EN.01003701.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/37

---

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2018 — Planet v Commission

(Case T-29/18) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the contract ‘Technical Assistance to Ecowas for the implementation of the 10th EDF Transport Facilitation Project II (TFP II)’ - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action had been brought - Withdrawal of the contested act - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 301/49)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Planet AE Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of an implied decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application of 6 November 2017 requesting access to certain documents relating to the contract ‘Technical Assistance to Ecowas for the implementation of the 10th EDF Transport Facilitation Project II (TFP II)’.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
16978, 17456

#### Jackson v. Jenkins

February 11, 1997

Order No. 97-12

Affirmed
# C_2018364EN.01002001.xml

| 8.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/20

---

Action brought on 22 August 2018 — Currency One v EUIPO — Cinkiarz.pl (CINKCIARZ)

(Case T-501/18)

(2018/C 364/21)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Currency One S.A. (Poznań, Poland) (represented by: P. Szmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cinkiarz.pl sp. z o. o. (Zielona Góra, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark CINKCIARZ — European Union trade mark No 13 678 991

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2018 in Case R 2598/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) thereof.

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41155 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ELIUT EDISON GUTIERREZ GUAJARDO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10

- CR

- 239

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eliut Edison Gutierrez Guajardo , federal prisoner # 81552

- 279, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s
denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based upon retroactive Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. By seeking leave to proceed IFP, Gutierrez Guajardo is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal is not t aken in good faith because it is frivolous. See Baugh v.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited ci rcumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 25, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41155 Document: 00513396014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2016No. 15

- 41155

2 Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 24(a)(5). On appeal, Gutierrez Guajardo argues that Amendment 782 lowered his offense level by two. He contends t hat the district court erred by finding otherwise and denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion.
At the original sentencing, the district court found that Gutierrez Guajardo was responsible for 4.92 kilograms of ice and that his base offense
level was 38 because th e offense involved more than 1.5 kilograms of ice. While Amendment 782 raised the amount of ice required for a base offense level of 38 to 4.5 kilograms, Gutierrez Guajardo was responsible for more than 4.5 kilograms of ice. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1). Accordingly, Amendment 782 did
not reduce his b ase offense level or his guidelines sentence range. See § 2D1.1(c)(1). As Amendment 782 did “ not have the ef fect of lowering [ his ] applicable guideline range ,” Gutierrez Guajardo was not eligible for a sente nce reduction under § 3582(c)(2). U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B); see United States v.
Bowman , 632 F.3d 906, 910

- 11 (5th Cir. 2011).
As Gutierrez Guajardo was ineligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2), his appeal does not present a nonfrivolous issue. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24 ; 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41155 Document: 00513396014 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2016
DENY and Opinion Filed April 6 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 22
- 00129
- CV IN RE VARSITY GAY LEAGUE, LLC , Relator Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 21
- 01181 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Molberg In this original proceeding, relator challenges the trial court’s January 18,
2022 order denying relator’s motion to co mpel discovery responses . Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator ha s no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins.
Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has failed
to show an abuse of discretion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, w e deny the petition for writ of mandamus.– 2

–

220129f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
***Exhibit 31.1 — CEO 302 Certification*****Web.com, Inc. Certification for Annual Report on Form 10-K**I, Jeffrey M. Stibel, certify that:1.    I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-K/A of Web.com, Inc.;2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;
Date: April 27, 2007/s/ Jeffrey M. Stibel Jeffrey M. StibelPresident and Chief Executive Officer
19133

#### State v. Cordero

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.4CERTIFICATION

I,
Patricia Graham, certify that:

1.   I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc.

2.   Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)  
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)  
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5.   The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)   all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6.   The
registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   April 30,
2007

| | /s/  
Patricia Graham Patricia Graham(Principal Accounting Officer)
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección de Salud de Animales y Plantas 

VISITE

Aprenda cómo detener las plagas hambrientas.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Decentralized Storage Alliance Association (“DSAA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Intel, Santa Clara, CA; and Seal Storage, Toronto, CANADA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and DSAA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 1, 2023, DSAA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal                               ( print page 86932)                            Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69670).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27586 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
SMITH COUNTY COURTHOUSE

100 N. BROADWAY 4th Floor

TYLER, TEXAS 75702

 April Allison Sikes, First Assistant

D. Matt Bingham

Criminal District Attorney

Smith County

TELEPHONE: (903) 535-0520

TELECOPIER: (903) 590-1719

Jennifer Barfield, Office Manager

Michael J. West. Appellate Chief

 

Ms. Pam Estes, Clerk

12th Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St., Ste. 354

Tyler, TX 75701

November 27, 2015

RE: Patterson v. State, Cause No. 12-15-00191-CR

Dear Ms. Lusk:

The State acknowledges receipt of the brief filed by Appellant’s counsel pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in the above-listed cause(s). The brief

presents no claims of error; therefore, the State has no points to which to respond. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.2(a)(2). The State will not file any further response unless the Court

decides that the appeal is not frivolous and orders one. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744;

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978).

Respectfully submitted,

D. MATT BINGHAM

Criminal District Attorney

Smith County, Texas

_______________________

Michael J. West

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

SBOT# 21203300

/s/ Michael J. West

ACCEPTED

12-15-00191-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

11/27/2015 9:15:36 AM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/27/2015 9:15:36 AM PAM ESTES Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the State’s acknowledgment of filing of an Anders

brief was served by electronic filing on November 27, 2015, on Mr. Austin Jackson,

Attorney at Law, 112 East Line, Ste. 310, Tyler, Texas 75702.

_________________________

Michael J. West

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

SBOT# 21203300

100 N. Broadway, 4th Fl.

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903) 590-1720

(903) 590-1719 (fax)

mwest@smith-county.com

/s/ Michael J. West
# C_2019004EN.01001801.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 23 October 2018 — AQ v Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics

(Case C-662/18)

(2019/C 4/24)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AQ

Defendant: Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics

Questions referred

| — | Must the provisions of Article 8 of the Directive of 19 October 2009 (1) be interpreted as precluding different bases of assessment and rate rules being used to tax the capital gain arising on a transfer of securities received in exchange and the deferred capital gain? |
| --- | --- |

—

Must the provisions of Article 8 of the Directive of 19 October 2009 (1) be interpreted as precluding different bases of assessment and rate rules being used to tax the capital gain arising on a transfer of securities received in exchange and the deferred capital gain?

| — | Must those provisions be interpreted in particular as precluding a situation in which reductions of the basis of assessment intended to take into account the period for which securities have been held do not apply to the deferred capital gain, having regard to the fact that that basis of assessment rule did not apply on the date on which the capital gain arose, but they do apply to the capital gain on a transfer of the securities received in exchange, taking into account the date of the exchange instead of the date on which the securities given in exchange were acquired? |
| --- | --- |

—

Must those provisions be interpreted in particular as precluding a situation in which reductions of the basis of assessment intended to take into account the period for which securities have been held do not apply to the deferred capital gain, having regard to the fact that that basis of assessment rule did not apply on the date on which the capital gain arose, but they do apply to the capital gain on a transfer of the securities received in exchange, taking into account the date of the exchange instead of the date on which the securities given in exchange were acquired?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2009/133/EC of 19 October 2009 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and to the transfer of the registered office of an SE or SCE between Member States (OJ 2009 L 310, p. 34).

---
November 16, 2000

23121

#### State v. Yoon

Affirmed
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 20, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-213885) of Smart Trust 285,
comprising Smart Trust, Tax-Advantaged Growth & Income Trust, Series 12.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 20, 2016
# C_2020240EN.01003602.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/36

---

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ZD v Parliament

(Case T-591/18) (1)

(2020/C 240/47)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3601-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the territory of Guam (FEMA-3601-EM), dated October 8, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 30, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective October 16, 2023.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-26268 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
##### **EXHIBIT 32**

## **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

In connection with the Annual Report of First Financial Service Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and;

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company;
| Date: March  16, 2007 | By:    | /s/ B. Keith Johnson                  |   |
|-----------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                  | B. Keith Johnson                      |
|                  |                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |                  |                                  |
| Date: March 16, 2007  | By:    | /s/ Gregory Schreacke                 |   |
|                  |                  | Gregory Schreacke                     |
|                  |                  | Chief Financial Officer               |
|                  |                  | Principal Accounting Officer          |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to us and will be retained by us andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----