alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFROMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            7675
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            7425
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  7700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      14782
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           34408
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             34683
<LOANS>                                         161102
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  236807
<DEPOSITS>                                      199841
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2839
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              14087
<LONG-TERM>                                      10413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4043
<OTHER-SE>                                       18836
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  236807
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  11697
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2217
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   466
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 14380
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                6075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6478
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7902
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (9)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4098
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2925
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.83
<LOANS-NON>                                        182
<LOANS-PAST>                                       243
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1830
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       82
<RECOVERIES>                                        21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2069
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1644
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            425
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, William J. Schmidt,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form10-K of Ibis Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 29,  2006         |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
|                          |
| /s/ ***William  J, Schmidt*** | *** *** |
| William J. Schmidt            |
| Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 5, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Katz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Michael W. KatzMichael W. KatzPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJune 18, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 758 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 758

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a 
                  Permanent Select Committee on Aging.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2016

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Matsui, Ms. Clarke of 
 New York, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Michelle 
Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. Meng, Mrs. 
   Dingell, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Pocan, Ms. 
Bonamici, Ms. Titus, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Gallego, 
  Mr. Murphy of Florida, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Keating, and Mr. Grijalva) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                                on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a 
                  Permanent Select Committee on Aging.

    Resolved, That rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
``Permanent Select Committee on Aging
    ``12. There is established a Permanent Select Committee on Aging 
which shall not have legislative jurisdiction but which shall have 
jurisdiction--
            ``(1) to conduct a continuing comprehensive study and 
        review of the problems of the older American, including but not 
        limited to income maintenance, poverty, housing, health 
        (including medical research), welfare, employment, education, 
        recreation, and long-term care;
            ``(2) to study the use of all practicable means and methods 
        of encouraging the development of public and private programs 
        and policies which will assist the older American in taking a 
        full part in national life and which will encourage the 
        utilization of the knowledge, skills, special aptitudes, and 
        abilities of older Americans to contribute to a better quality 
        of life for all Americans;
            ``(3) to develop policies that would encourage the 
        coordination of both governmental and private programs designed 
        to deal with problems of aging; and
            ``(4) to review any recommendations made by the President 
        or by the White House Conference on aging relation to programs 
        or policies affecting older Americans.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Ventura

21519

1/25/99

Vacated & Remanded
#### FIRST PACIFIC ADVISORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VANTAGEPOINT INVESTMENT ADVISORS, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-57128.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 14, 2005.

Paul W. Cane, Jr., Esq., Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*226Geoffrey Thomas Stover, Esq., Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, Alan S. Petlak, Esq., Morgan Lewis & Boekius, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL**, District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Plaintiff First Pacific Advisors, Inc., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Vantage-point Investment Advisors. On de novo review, *Am. Bankers Ass’n v. Gould,*412 F.3d 1081, 1085 (9th Cir.2005), we affirm.

Defendant did not breach any provision of the parties’ contract. The contract allowed Defendant to withdraw its funds at any time. The contract contained no requirement for Plaintiff to keep a minimum balance, nor any requirement to pay Defendant except for services actually rendered with respect to funds in the account.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit
31.2
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I,
Frederick W. Smith, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Itec Environmental Group, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 April 14,
2005
  /s/ Frederick
W. Smith
 
 Frederick
W. Smith
 Chief
Financial Officer
# C_2018399EN.01004701.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/47

---

Action brought on 11 September 2018 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (fitness)

(Case T-536/18)

(2018/C 399/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht, C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: European Food SA (Păntășești, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark fitness — European Union trade mark No 2 470 326

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2018 in Case R 755/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | dismiss the appeal against the Cancellation Division’s decision 5802 C of 18 October 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the appeal against the Cancellation Division’s decision 5802 C of 18 October 2013;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
February 1, 2000

21060

#### Bank of Hawaii v. Chun

Affirmed
# C_2019035EN.01000902.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Brescia (Italy) lodged on 31 October 2018 — JH v KG

(Case C-681/18)

(2019/C 35/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Brescia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JH

Defendant: KG

Question referred

Must Article 5(5) of Directive 2008/104/EC (1) of 19 November 2008 be interpreted as precluding the application of Legislative Decree No 276/2003, as amended by Decree Law 34/2014, which: (a) does not place limits on successive assignments of the same worker to the same user undertaking; (b) does not require that, in order for the use of fixed-term supply work to be lawful, there must be technical, production, organisational or replacement reasons for having recourse to such supply work; (c) does not provide that, in order for the use of such a form of employment contract to be lawful, the production requirement of the user undertaking must be temporary in nature?

---

(1)  Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 9).

---
Gulfstream 


A GENERAL DVNAMICS 	COMPANY 

April 2,2012 

A&C-12-227 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: 	 Request for Exemption from Section 25.901 (c) of Title 14, Powerplant, 

Installation, for Conditions of Uncontrollable High Engine Thrust 

FAA Project No.: TC8700AT-T 

Attachment: 	 Petition for Exemption - Uncontrollable High Thrust Failure Conditions, 

Model GVI 

Dear Sirs: 

In accordance with 14 CFR Part 11, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation requests consideration 

of the enclosed petition for exemption. This petition is being submitted to relieve the Gulfstream 

GVI model aircraft from full compliance with 14 CFR 25.901(c) at amendment 46, Powerplant, 

Installation, to account for a potential failure that would result in an uncontrollable high thrust 

condition in a very limited portion of the flight envelope for the GVI aircraft. 

If you have any questions or require any additional information please contact me via the 

contact information listed below or Natalie Mault at 912-965-5466. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Glasscock 

Certification Director, G650 Program 

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation 

P.O. Box 2206, MIS R-03 

Savannah, GA 31402-2206 

robert.glasscock@gulfstream.com 

(912) 965-6817 

cc: N. Berrryman, ACE-102A (via email) 

P. Hatton, EASA (via email) 

M. Gordon, ANM-113 (via email) 

P.O. Box 2206 • Savannah. GA 31402-2206 USA. Telephone (912) 965-3000 • gulfstream.com
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 21-07

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron Rippke

Director

SUBJECT: Updated Process for Video Submission for Virtual Inspections 

related to Remodeled or New Facilities for Existing Licensed 

Establishments

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Notice is to inform existing licensees that the Center for 

Veterinary Biologics (CVB) has a secured cloud-based service, CloudVault, that can 

be used to submit the required videos for virtual inspections related to remodeled or 

newly constructed facilities. 

II. BACKGROUND

CVB Notice 20-06, published August 27, 2020, provided for timely inspections of 

remodeled or new facilities. At that time the only option for video submission was a 

USB Flash Drive with file sizes of 35 MB or less. 

The USDA CloudVault allows for secured submission of videos. CVB recommends

the video format be MP4 or MOV.

III. ACTION

Existing licensees will be able to submit videos for new construction via the USDA 

CloudVault. A secured link will be sent to the establishment via the NCAH Portal 

with detailed instructions for uploading videos. CVB will no longer accept USB 

Flash Drives for virtual inspections. 

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY

This practice goes into effect immediately.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,625,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              699,544,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   664,000
<INVENTORY>                                222,845,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           927,350,000
<PP&E>                                      25,338,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,304,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             941,384,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      309,331,000
<BONDS>                                    286,990,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 345,032,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               941,384,000
<SALES>                                     76,977,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,977,000
<CGS>                                       10,930,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,930,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            37,183,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            15,210,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,881,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                773,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   325,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   448,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>