alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
of Form 10-Q for the period ending October 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Katz,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                   By: By: /s/ Michael W. Katz
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Michael W. Katz
                                                       President and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       December 13, 2005


                                       17
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### December 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136026(22) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136026 COA: 282578 Wayne CC: 94-005006-01-FC DAVID KORAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s September 9, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

1215 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2008

Clerk
# C_2020279EN.01001001.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — European Commission v CX

(Case C-131/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Disciplinary proceedings - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 4 - Opportunity for the official who cannot be heard to comment in writing or to be represented - Article 22 - Hearing of the official by the Appointing Authority prior to the adoption of the disciplinary penalty - Alleged inability of the official to be heard and to make written submissions or to be represented - Assessment of medical evidence - Failure of the General Court of the European Union to reply to arguments raised at first instance)

(2020/C 279/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, T. S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018, CX v Commission (T-743/16 RENV, not published, EU:T:2018:937); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018, CX v Commission (T-743/16 RENV, not published, EU:T:2018:937);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Soil FAQ's

Last Modified: 

Print

How long does it take for a permit to be issued?

It can take up to 30 days for a permit to be processed after the paperwork is

received from the state.

Will I need a permit to import soil?

 Yes, any soil being imported from foreign sources requires an import permit.

How long is the soil permit valid?

 Unless special situations exist, the standard time frame for soil is up to 3 years from

the date of issuance.

Will I need a permit if I am importing rocks?

 If the specimens are large enough and are not contaminated with soil or any other

organic debris, an APHIS permit is not required.

Will I need a permit if I am importing sediment?
 If the sample was collected in salt water, an APHIS permit is not required.

What will I need in my facility to become an

approved soil laboratory? 

Generally, when Plant Protection and Quarantine Officials inspect a facility, they are

looking for a laboratory type setting with adequate safeguards in place to prevent

pest escape, a secure area to store soil when not in use, and an autoclave or

incinerator.
# C_2020313EN.01002002.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/20

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2020 — Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-203/19 P) (1)

(2020/C 313/27)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
# C_2021189EN.01000201.xml

| 17.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites AE — LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi AE, NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites AE, LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi AE v Archi Exetasis Prodikastikon Prosfigon (AEPP), Attiko Metro AE

(Case C-771/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Procurement contracts in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors - Directive 92/13/EEC - Review procedures - Pre-contractual stage - Assessment of bids - Rejection of a technical bid and acceptance of the bid of a competitor - Suspension of the implementation of that measure - Legitimate interest of the unsuccessful tenderer in challenging the legality of the bid of the successful tenderer)

(2021/C 189/02)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites AE — LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi AE, NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites AE, LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi AE

Defendants: Archi Exetasis Prodikastikon Prosfigon (AEPP), Attiko Metro AE

Intervening parties: SALFO kai Synergates Anonymi Etairia Meletitikon Ypiresion Technikon Ergon — Grafeio Doxiadi Symvouloi gia Anaptyxi kai Oikistiki AE — TPF Getinsa Euroestudios SL, SALFO kai Synergates Anonymi Etairia Meletitikon Ypiresion Technikon Ergon, Grafeio Doxiadi Symvouloi gia Anaptyxi kai Oikistiki AE, TPF Getinsa Euroestudios SL

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) and (3), Article 2(1)(a) and (b) and Article 2a(2) of Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, as amended by Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that a tenderer who has been excluded from a procurement procedure for the award of a public contract at a stage prior to the final contract award stage and whose request for suspension of the decision to exclude it from the procedure has been refused, may advance, in its request for suspension of the decision to admit the bid of another tenderer, introduced simultaneously, any plea based on the infringement of EU law concerning public procurement or of national rules transposing that law, including pleas which have no connection with the shortcomings for which its own bid was excluded. That option is not affected by the fact that the application for an administrative review before an independent national authority, which must, under national law, first be brought by the tenderer against the decision to exclude it, has been rejected, provided that that rejection has not become definitive.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          80,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,623,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                   405,013
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,256,050
<PP&E>                                      17,925,686
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,524,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,305,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,180,554
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       789,158
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,511,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,305,491
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,695,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,519,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,765,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             362,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,050,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                   167,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            882,061
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   882,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Pamela A. Mussenden, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Easton Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004
9/20/18; Last reviewed/formatted May 2023 Page 1 of 1

Pale Cyst Nematode Program Deregulation Protocol for Agricultural Land No Longer in Host Crop Production
2022 Quick Reference

Steps to Survey Data Collection

Program: Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Biocontrol 

Application: ArcGIS Field Maps 

Host: MRP GIS Enterprise (portal) 

Map Title: PPQ EAB WI Biocontrol 2022 Field Map CHECK URL! https://maps.mrp.usda.gov/arcgis/

IMPORTANT!! You must synchronize your map at the beginning/end of each workday.

1. Open ArcGIS Field Maps. Sign into ArcGIS Enterprise using the MRP Enterprise URL.

2. Open previously downloaded map area. 

3. Stand at the point you wish to collect. 

From the menu bar at the top of the page, tap the Layers icon to toggle ON the 

layers you wish to view/edit. (Figure 1)

4. To record a survey location, tap the blue plus sign in the 

lower-right corner of the map. 

 

5. Fill out the data form. 

* All fields with a grey asterisk are required fields. 

 

6. Check your data entries and tap the Submit button at the top-right part of the page. 

If the Submit button fails, you have not completed all required fields or GPS accuracy failed.

**Proceed to the next survey location and repeat steps 3-6. 

To preserve battery power, put the iPad to sleep between surveys. 

For more details on the map, refer to the PPQ EAB WI Biocontrol Data Collection 2022 Manual.

2022 Disclaimer: Training techniques or workflows held within are designed as basic job aids. Mobile collection tools and technology 

used are constantly being improved upon. End users should consult with management for current workflows and standards.

Figure 1. EAB Biocontrol layers menu

ArcGIS Field Maps 

Mobile Application

David Cappaert, Bugwood.org
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfumania
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Donna Dellomo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/ Donna DellomoDonna DellomoChief Financial OfficerSeptember 14, 2009
# C_2019025EN.01005001.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/50

---

Action brought on 13 November 2018 — Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of four filled-in holes in a regular hole pattern)

(Case T-669/18)

(2019/C 25/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Neoperl AG (Reinach, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Börjes-Pestalozza, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Mark at issue: Application for an EU position mark (Representation of four filled-in holes in a regular hole pattern) — Application No 16 259 665

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2018 in Case R 2059/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

[Tri Counties Bank Letterhead] 

December 19, 2016 
 Mr. John S. Fleshood 

208 Oak Street 
 Elmhurst, IL 60126 

Dear John: 
 This letter amends Tri Counties Bank’s offer
letter to you dated November 2, 2016, which you signed on November 3, 2016. 
 The sixth paragraph of the letter is amended to add the following
sentence: “To receive this severance payment, you must execute the Severance and Release Agreement within 30 days of your termination and allow it to become effective, in which case the Bank will pay such severance in a lump sum on the 45th day following your termination.” 
 Please confirm your agreement to this amendment by
countersigning this letter below. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ Glenn C. Hunter

	 Glenn C. Hunter

	 Senior Vice President

	 Chief Human Resources Officer



 Accepted and agreed as of December 20, 2016: 

 

	
	/s/ John S. Fleshood
	John S. Fleshood
# C_2020222EN.01002201.xml

| 6.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/22

---

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2020 –Bernis and Others v SRB

(Case T-282/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Parent company and subsidiary - Declaration by the ECB that an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme - Lack of public interest - Winding up in accordance with national law - Shareholders - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 222/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ernests Bernis (Jurmala, Latvia), Oļegs Fiļs (Jurmala), OF Holding SIA (Riga, Latvia), Cassandra Holding Company SIA (Jurmala) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. De Carpentier, M. Meijer Timmerman Thijssen, A. Valavanidou, H. Ehlers and E. Muratori, acting as Agents, and by A. Rivas, lawyer, and B. Heenan, Solicitor)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: G. Marafioti, E. Koupepidou and J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions of the SRB of 23 February 2018, by which it decided not to adopt resolution schemes in respect of ABLV Bank AS and its subsidiary, ABLV Bank Luxembourg SA, under Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Messrs Ernests Bernis and Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA and Cassandra Holding Company SIA shall bear their own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Messrs Ernests Bernis and Oļegs Fiļs, OF Holding SIA and Cassandra Holding Company SIA shall bear their own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the European Central Bank (ECB).

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Wildlife Services' Nonlethal Initiative

Last Modified: 

Print
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements for the twelve month period ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298
<INVENTORY>                                        560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,582
<PP&E>                                          47,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (41)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)


</TABLE>