alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO
AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Dendrite International, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), John E. Bailye, as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Kathleen E. Donovan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:


     (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|JOHN E. BAILYE
Name:  John E. Bailye
Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 13, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

|KATHLEEN E. DONOVAN
Name:  Kathleen E. Donovan
Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 13, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
MAF Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.'s
33-79110, 333-06593, 333-65655, 333-66693, 333-72865, 333-72863) on Form S-8 of
MAF Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2000, relating to the
consolidated statements of financial condition of MAF Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report
appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of MAF Bancorp, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 20, 2000
# C_2019054EN.01002001.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/20

---

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission

(Case T-350/18) (1)

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Partial annulment of the contested measure - Amending decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 54/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Euronet Consulting EEIG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Peeters and R. van Cleemput, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, T. Ramopoulos and A. Aresu, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision, notified to the applicant by letter of 26 March 2018, to reject the tender for Lot 2, submitted by the consortium of which the applicant is the leader, in the call for tenders EuropeAid/138778/DH/SER/MULTI, entitled ‘Framework contract for the implementation of external aid 2018 (FWC SIEA 2018) 2017/S 128-260026’ and to award the contract to ten other tenderers.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
19136

#### State v. Gill

Affirmed
# C_2018112EN.01003601.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/36

---

Action brought on 19 January 2018 — Planet v Commission

(Case T-29/18)

(2018/C 112/46)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Planet AE Anonimi Etairia Parokhis Simvouleftikon Ipiresion (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the refusal decision of the Commission, whereby the Commission implicitly rejected the applicant’s request for access to the documents relating to the tendering procedure for the EuropeAid/137681/ΙΗ/SER/ROC/4 project; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the refusal decision of the Commission, whereby the Commission implicitly rejected the applicant’s request for access to the documents relating to the tendering procedure for the EuropeAid/137681/ΙΗ/SER/ROC/4 project; and

| — | order the Commission to pay all the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this action, Planet seeks the annulment of the Commission’s implicit decision whereby it denied Planet access to documents, under Regulation No 1049/2001, in connection with the EuropeAid/137681/ΙΗ/SER/ROC/4 tendering procedure.

Planet maintains that the Commission’s implicit refusal should be annulled, since no reasons have been stated, which is mandatory under Article 296 TFEU in terms of EU law and which constitutes an essential procedural requirement for EU acts.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the finan-
cial statements for Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. and is qualified in its en-
tirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>	0000854926
<NAME> Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>	1

<S>	<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>	12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>	APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>	MAR-31-1999
<CASH>	5,426,528
<SECURITIES>	156,635
<RECEIVABLES>	0
<ALLOWANCES>	0
<INVENTORY>	0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	1,231,942
<PP&E>	142,723,550
<DEPRECIATION>	39,508,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	111,946,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	79,491,693
<BONDS>	0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0
<PREFERRED>	0
<COMMON>	0
<OTHER-SE>	32,454,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	111,946,154
<SALES>	0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	13,968,742
<CGS>	0
<TOTAL-COSTS>	0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	13,968,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	4,779,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>	4,779,260
<INCOME-TAX>	0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	0
<DISCONTINUED>	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	0
<CHANGES>	0
<NET-INCOME>	4,779,260
<EPS-BASIC>	(64.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>	0


</TABLE>
July 9, 2001

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE 01-07

Subject: Identification of Testing Methods for Detection of Extraneous Agents in Fetal

Bovine Serum

To: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this notice is to request information regarding how firms currently are meeting

requirements for and providing results of extraneous agent testing of fetal bovine serum (FBS)

in accordance with 9 CFR 113.53. Historically, this information has been determined by

various methods and reported in variable formats. The Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB)

is interested in how the ingredients of animal origin are being tested and who actually conducts

the testing. It is the intent of the CVB to gather this information for future policy decisions.

II. ACTION

Licensees and Permittees should update their information on extraneous agent testing of FBS to

reflect current practices and provide an informational summary listing the test methods used by

the firm to the CVB. The firm should also provide iftesting is: 1) conducted by the firm,

contract, or serum supplier; or 2) if Certificates of Analysis, firm bench records, internal Quality

Assurance audits, Audits of contractors, or other forms of information from contractors or

suppliers is offered as verification of extraneous agent for FBS.

The CVB requests that firms submit copies of this informational summary to the Center for

Veterinary Biologics-Licensing and Policy Development before September 15, 2001.

Randall L. Levings

Director

Center for Veterinary Biologics

 APHIS - Protecting American Agriculture

 An Equal Opportunity Employer

United States

Department of

Agriculture

Marketing and

Regulatory

Programs

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary

Biologics

P.O. Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 663-7331

FAX (515) 663-7673

E-mail:

cvb@aphis.usda.gov

Federal Relay

Service

(Voice/TTY/ASCII/

Spanish)

(800) 877-8339
#### Kauai Ins. Agency v. Duarte

19872

2/5/98

Vacated and Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854858
<NAME>                        Ajay Sports, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                           101
<SECURITIES>                                     348
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                     558
<INVENTORY>                                    3,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,844
<PP&E>                                         3,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                25,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,137
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,179
<PREFERRED>                                    1,250
<COMMON>                                          41
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  25,733
<SALES>                                       14,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              14,340
<CGS>                                         12,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (1,625)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (4,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,833
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.70)



</TABLE>
**Annex 7. Item 7.4. – Article 10.9.2. of Chapter 10.9. Infection with SVCV**

CHAPTER 10.9.INFECTION WITH SPRING VIRAEMIA OF CARP VIRUS 

[...]

Article 10.9.2.

Scope

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.:

[...]

___________________________
# I PAN CONVEYOR 

# I

LUMP BIN SAMPLER I 22X CONVEYOR 

## I 

# EVELETH MINES FLOW SHEET No. 8 FROM LINE 2 COOLER SEE SHEET 7 

## PELLET LOADOUT FROM LINE I COOLER SEE SHEET 7 VIBRATING FEEDER 

## I IVIBRATING FEEDER : IDUST SUPRESSIDNII 

# I 21A CONVEYOR 

# I I 21 CONVEYOR I



# --- 

# ---- : 21B CONVEYOR I 

# -

# - -**~** 22S CONVEYOR 

# - - -- 

# -- ------------- 

# -

-- ALTERNATES '- 

# --

.... 

# -

<::- 

# - 22N CONVEYOR 

# I

"' 

# -

-::-_



## ,_



## '-

',--_ ALTERNATE 

### ' 

# -

' 

# - ALTERNATE', -, ', ',, ALTERNATE ALTEF 

# I 23S CONVEYOR

### --------~"-~~~-----**~------** l ' 

## ' ' I PAN CONVEYOR I

I I IUD "DTI\1



## ' 23N CONVEYOR 

# I

'---- 

# ' PELLET BIN #3 PELLET BIN #2 PELLET BIN #1 BOOO L T 3700 LT 3700 LT TRAl 

# t SCAl I I RAILROAD CAR LOADOUT
# C_2020061EN.01002501.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Vanda Pharmaceuticals v Commission

(Case T-211/18) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fanaptum - iloperidone - Commission refusal decision - Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Equal treatment)

(2020/C 61/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vanda Pharmaceuticals Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, B. Natens, A. S. Melin and C. Muttin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of (i) the Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 252 final of 15 January 2018 refusing marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1) for the medicinal product for human use Fanaptum — iloperidone, and (ii) the opinion and the assessment report of the Committee for Human Medicinal Products of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of 9 November 2017.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vanda Pharmaceuticals Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vanda Pharmaceuticals Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3975

___________

James Eli Huff, II, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Linda Sanders, Warden, *

FCC - Forrest City, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 5, 2009

Filed: December 14, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James Huff appeals from the district court’s1

 order granting in part and denying

in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He also has filed a motion to supplement the

appellate record with a document filed in the district court, which we grant. Having

carefully reviewed the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its

1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the Recommended Disposition of the

Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas. 
conclusions of law de novo, see Chavez v. Weber, 497 F.3d 796, 801 (8th Cir. 2007),

we conclude the district court’s decision was correct. See Reno v. Koray, 515 U.S.

50, 62-63, 65 (1995) (no sentencing credit for court-ordered time spent in community

treatment center after release on bail and pending sentencing; notwithstanding

restrictive conditions, time was not “official detention” within meaning of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3585(b)); United States v. Johnson, 418 F.3d 879, 880-81 (8th Cir. 2005) (defendant

not entitled to credit for time served in halfway house during period of supervised

release). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Michigan Tech Research Institute - Exemption/Rulemaking
NO. 12-09-00344-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TRACI ANNETTE CHRISTENSEN, ' APPEAL FROM THE 354TH

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

RAINS COUNTY,

APPELLEE ' RAINS COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant, Traci Annette Christensen, has 

failed, after notice, to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial court clerk=s fee for 

preparing the clerk=s record. Christensen appeals from a judgment signed on 

September 11, 2009. On November 13, 2009, this court notified the trial court clerk that 

the clerk’s record was due to have been filed on or before November 10, 2009. The court 

also extended the time for filing the clerk=s record to December 10, 2009. On November 

18, 2009, the trial court clerk responded in writing that the clerk=s record had not been 

filed because Christensen had not paid the fee for preparation of the record. 

On November 23, 2009, this court informed Christensen that the clerk=s letter 

stated the reason for the delay in filing was due to nonpayment of the required 

preparation fee. Christensen was further informed that, pursuant to rules of appellate 

procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of full 

payment to the clerk was provided on or before December 3, 2009. Because Christensen 

has not provided proof of full payment or otherwise responded to this court=s notice, the 

appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered December 16, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
# C_2019182EN.01000301.xml

| 27.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/3

---

Appeal brought on 17 December 2018 by Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 October 2018 in Case T-33/18, Pracsis and Conceptexpo Project v Commission and EACEA

(Case C-794/18 P)

(2019/C 182/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Pracsis SPRL, Conceptexpo Project (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA)

By order of 11 April 2019, the Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

---
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thesix-month period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Paula J. Meiler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Paula J. Meiler Paula J. Meiler  Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer   ***** This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except asotherwise stated in such filing.
#### Feliks VISHEVNIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-1422-CV.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 17, 2005.

Feliks Vishevnik, Far Rockaway, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant, pro se.

Julian L. Kalkstein, Assistant Counsel, City of New York Corporation Counsel, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee.

PRESENT: WALKER, Chief Judge, HALL, Circuit Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Richard C. Wesley recused himself prior to oral argument and took no part in the disposition of this appeal. It was decided by the remaining two members of the panel, who are in agreement. *See*2d Cir. R. § 0.14(b).

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

*709Plaintiff-appellant Feliks Vishevnik appeals from a February 17, 2004, order entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leonard B. Sand, Judge) dismissing his complaint of wrongful termination on the basis of national origin. We assume familiarity with the facts and procedural history. We affirm the district court’s ruling.

On April 2,1998, the Board of Education (“BOE”) fired Vishevnik from his job as a Preparatory Provisional Teacher at Abraham Lincoln High School and declined to renew his BOE license. Soon after his termination, he filed a complaint in New York state court alleging that he was terminated due to discrimination. The New York courts found that Vishevnik was terminated due to insubordination and unsatisfactory performance. On February 2, 2003, he filed a complaint with the United States Department of Education for Civil Rights (“OCR”), which was referred to the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). The EEOC issued a Right to Sue Letter on April 10, 2003. Vishevnik then filed a civil suit in federal court.

Title VII requires that, before a civil lawsuit can be filed, an administrative charge must be filed with the EEOC or a local equivalent agency within 300 days of the alleged discriminatory acts. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1); *Tewksbury v. Ottaway Newspapers,*192 F.3d 322, 325 (2d Cir.1999). Vishevnik’s charge was not timely filed. He was terminated on April 2, 1998. He did not file a charge with the OCR until February 2, 2003, and the OCR referred Vishevnik’s complaint to the EEOC on February 10, 2003. Thus, Vishevnik filed the charge almost five years after he was terminated, far beyond the 300-day deadline, and the district court correctly held that the claim is time-barred.

For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the District Court of the Southern District of New York is hereby AFFIRMED.