alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020095EN.01002601.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2020 — Dalasa v EUIPO — Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin (charantea)

(Case T-732/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark charantea - Earlier EU figurative mark CHARITÉ - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 95/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft Öffentlichen Rechts (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff and K. Schmidt-Hern, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2018 (Case R 539/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Charité and Dalasa.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 October 2018 (Case R 539/2018-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 October 2018 (Case R 539/2018-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH in the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dalasa Handelsgesellschaft mbH in the proceedings before the General Court;

| 3. | Orders Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft Öffentlichen Rechts to bear the costs that it has incurred during the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft Öffentlichen Rechts to bear the costs that it has incurred during the proceedings before the General Court;

| 4. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 11.2.2019.

---
# C_2020240EN.01002401.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/24

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — EIS GmbH v TO

(Case C-266/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2011/83/EU - Article 6(1)(c) and (h), and Article 6(4) - Annex I.A - Right of withdrawal - Information to be provided by traders in relation to the conditions, time limit and procedures for exercising the right of withdrawal - Obligation for traders to provide a telephone number ‘where available’ - Scope)

(2020/C 240/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties in the main proceedings

Applicant: EIS GmbH

Defendant: TO

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1)(c) of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation where a trader’s telephone number appears on his or her website, in such a way that it suggests, in the eyes of the average consumer, namely a reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect consumer, that that trader uses that telephone number in his or her contacts with consumers, that telephone number must be regarded as being ‘available’, within the meaning of that provision. In such a case, Article 6 (1)(c) and (h), as well as Article 6(4) of that directive, read in conjunction with Annex I.A thereto, must be interpreted as meaning that a trader who provides the consumer, before the latter is bound by a distance or off-premises contract, with the information relating to the procedures for exercising the right of withdrawal using the model instructions set out in Annex I.A, is required to mention the same telephone number so as to allow that consumer to communicate to the trader any decision to exercise that right using that telephone number.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.

---
# C_2021035EN.01001501.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v TV2/Danmark A/S, Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-445/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Public-service broadcaster - Article 106(2) TFEU - Services of general economic interest - Aid compatible with the internal market - Article 108(3) TFEU - Notification - Failure to notify - Recipient’s obligation to pay interest in respect of the period during which that aid was unlawful - Calculation of interest - Amounts to be included)

(2021/C 35/19)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd

Defendants: TV2/Danmark A/S, Kingdom of Denmark

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 108(3) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation incumbent on national courts to order the recipient of State aid implemented in breach of that provision to pay illegality interest in respect of that aid also applies where, by its final decision, the European Commission finds that that aid is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 106(2) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 108(3) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation incumbent on national courts to order the recipient of State aid implemented in breach of that provision to pay illegality interest in respect of that aid also applies where, by its final decision, the European Commission finds that that aid is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 106(2) TFEU.

| 2. | Article 108(3) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation which is incumbent on national courts to order the recipient of State aid implemented in breach of that provision to pay illegality interest in respect of that aid applies also to aid which that recipient has transferred to affiliated undertakings and to aid received by it from a publicly controlled undertaking. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 108(3) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation which is incumbent on national courts to order the recipient of State aid implemented in breach of that provision to pay illegality interest in respect of that aid applies also to aid which that recipient has transferred to affiliated undertakings and to aid received by it from a publicly controlled undertaking.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.

---
# C_2019328EN.01005101.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — XF v Commission

(Case T-482/18) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Temporary change of place of employment - Change of residence)

(2019/C 328/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: XF (represented by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the European Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 2 October 2017, by which it refused to grant the applicant the benefit of the installation allowance when he moved and took up his appointment at the headquarters of the European External Action Service (EEAS) in Brussels (Belgium).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders XF to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders XF to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             316,706
<SECURITIES>                                     3,267,940
<RECEIVABLES>                                      430,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,255,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,398,078
<PP&E>                                           2,031,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,196,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              860,008
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,818
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,327,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,196,220
<SALES>                                          8,804,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,804,235
<CGS>                                           10,144,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,772,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,698,355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,698,355)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.22)
        


</TABLE>
WILLIAM B. PAULK

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2745

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. Shonna Young Gay , Judge

.

Lawrence F. Kranert, Jr., Tallahassee , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General

, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

March 06, 2014

Hon. Bianca A. Medina

Law Office of Reynaldo Martinez, Jr.

915 Kinney Avenue

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

Hon. Ed Chapa

Bonilla & Chapa

P.O. Box 5488

Corpus Christi, TX 78465

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00543-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 07-6350-H

Style: In the Interest of M. M., A Child

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: 347th District Court

Hon. Patsy Perez, District Clerk/Nueces

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera, Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region
# C_2019148EN.01005301.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/53

---

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2019 — Herrero Torres v EUIPO — DZ Licores (CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES)

(Case T-326/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CARAJILLO LICOR 43 CUARENTA Y TRES - Earlier national figurative mark Carajillo - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 148/51)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: José-Ramón Herrero Torres (Castellón de la Plana, Spain) (represented by: J. Gil Martí, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O'Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: DZ Licores, SLU (Cartagena, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros and B. Lamas Begué, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2018 (Case R 2104/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Herrero Torres and DZ Licores.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr José-Ramón Herrero Torres shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr José-Ramón Herrero Torres shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---
Waiver Request Support Document

79 Attachment 4 2013 Amendments to HD OBD and OBD II Enforcement Regulations 189
Amendments that Establish New or More Stringent Requirements A. Section (d): Remedial Action 1. Section (d)(3)(A)(iii)/ [Section 1968.5(c)(3)(A)(iii)]: Ordered Remedial Action-Mandatory Recall- Misfire Monitor 2. Section (d)(3)(A)(vi) )/ [Section 1968.5(c)(3)(A)(vi)]: Ordered Remedial Action-Mandatory Recall- PM Filter Monitor

Amendments that Relax or Cl arify Existing Requirements A. Section (a): General: Definitions 1. Section (a)(3)/ /[Section 1968.5(a)(3)] “Nonconforming OBD System” B. Section (b): Testing Procedures for ARB-Conducted Testing 1. Section (b)(3)(D)(ii)(b)/ [Section 1968.5(b)(3)(D)(ii)b.]: Engines to be included in a Test Sample Group. 2. Section (b)(6)(B) )/[Section 1968.5(b)(6)(A),(b)(6)(B), (c)(3)(A)(i), (c)(3)(A)(ii)]: Finding of Nonconformance after Enforcement Testing/Ordered Remedial Action-Mandatory Recall C. Section (d): Remedial Action 1. Section (d)(3)(A)(i): Ordered Remedial Action-Mandatory Recall- Major Monitors

189 Amendments to provisions of the OBD II regulation are indicated by providing the corresponding provision in section 1968.2 in brackets [ ].
EXHIBIT 12
 DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(In thousands, except for ratio data)
 Fiscal Years EndedJanuary 3,
    
    
    December 29,
    
    
    December 30,
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    January 1,2009
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2005Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes,
minority interests and equity
earnings
    
    $
    92,522
    
    
    $
    (36,194
    )
    
    $
    (16,421
    )
    
    $
    86,715
    
    
    $
    151,171Distributed income of equity method
investees
    
    
    271
    
    
    
    439
    
    
    
    1,478
    
    
    
    2,040
    
    
    
    2,173Fixed charges from continuing
operations
    
    
    242,064
    
    
    
    250,758
    
    
    
    225,162
    
    
    
    185,122
    
    
    
    185,730Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    334,857
    
    
    $
    215,003
    
    
    $
    210,219
    
    
    $
    273,877
    
    
    $
    339,074Fixed charges from continuing
operations:Interest expense
    
    $
    169,799
    
    
    $
    190,129
    
    
    $
    169,719
    
    
    $
    134,926
    
    
    $
    142,998Amortization of debt expense and
discounts
    
    
    4,686
    
    
    
    4,722
    
    
    
    4,996
    
    
    
    7,526
    
    
    
    9,505Assumed interest element included
in rent expense
    
    
    67,579
    
    
    
    55,907
    
    
    
    50,447
    
    
    
    42,670
    
    
    
    33,227Total fixed charges from continuing
operations
    
    $
    242,064
    
    
    $
    250,758
    
    
    $
    225,162
    
    
    $
    185,122
    
    
    $
    185,730Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(A)
    
    
    1.38
    X
    
    
    0.86
    X
    
    
    0.93
    X
    
    
    1.48
    X
    
    
    1.83
    X
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys loss from continuing operations in both 2007 and 2006, the ratio of
earnings to fixed charges was less than 1:1. The Company must generate additional earnings of $35.8
million and $14.9 million to achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1 for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Home | Contact RGGI, Inc. | Sitemap | Mailing List

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

an initiative of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States of the U.S.

RGGI, Inc. RGGI Benefits CO Auctions, Tracking & Offsets Program Design News & Updates Documents

Program Overview

The RGGI CO Cap

Regulated Sources

Allowance Allocation

2015 Allocation

> 2013 Allocation

2012 Allocation

2009-2011 Allocation

State Statutes & 

Regulations

2012 Program Review

Program Design Archive

2013 Allowance Allocation

CO allowances are issued by each RGGI State in an amount defined in each state's applicable statute and/or 

regulations. Together, all the CO allowances issued by all the RGGI States comprise the RGGI cap.

For 2013, the RGGI cap for the nine-state RGGI region is 165 million short tons.

The charts below display the distribution of CO allowances by category for CO allowance allocation year 2013 as of 

March 17, 2014.

For more details on the distribution of CO allowances by state, download the full data here:

[ PDF ] [ XLS ]

Legend Key

CO Allowance Budget: Total number of CO allowances issued by each participating state for 2013.

Offered at Auction: Portion of CO allowance budget offered at auction (includes Sold at Auction, Offered but 

Unsold at Auction, and Unsold Allowances Retired).

Sold at Auction: Portion of CO Allowance Budget sold at auction.

Sold at Fixed Price: Portion of CO Allowance Budget sold directly to regulated sources at a fixed price.

Unsold Allowances Retired: Portion of CO Allowance Budget that was offered at an auction but was not sold and 

has been retired.

Offered but Unsold at Auction: Portion of CO Allowance Budget that was offered at an auction but was not sold.

Transferred from State Set-Aside Accounts: Portion of CO Allowance Budget that has been distributed directly 

from state accounts.

Remaining Set-Aside Allowances: Portion of CO Allowance Budget delegated as state set-aside allowances that 

are remaining in state set-aside accounts.

Set-Aside Allowances Retired: Portion of CO Allowance Budget that has been retired from state set-aside 

accounts.

Search...

2

2 2 

2

2 2

2

2 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) CO2 Budget Trading Program - 2013 Allocat... Page 1 of 2

http://rggi.org/design/overview/allowance-allocation/2013-allocation 5/29/2014
Please note: Percentages do not include the small number of second control period CO allowances sold by New 

Jersey from 2009-2011.

Full data on 2013 CO allowance allocation can be downloaded here: [ PDF ] [ XLS ]

2

2

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) CO2 Budget Trading Program - 2013 Allocat... Page 2 of 2

http://rggi.org/design/overview/allowance-allocation/2013-allocation 5/29/2014
July 2020

There were 10 surveillance inspections conducted at 10 different sites for a total of 

56 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to increase in response to the 

warm air temperatures. The one Category 2 (suspect) site completed harvest. All

other sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for 

monthly sampling. No cages were confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

August 2019 96 0 21511

September 2019 101 0 21612

October 2019 90 0 21702

November 2019 93 0 21795

December 2019 91 0 21886

January 2020 81 0 21967

February 2020 78 0 22045

March 2020 55 0 23000

April 2020 50 0 23050

May 2020 50 0 23100

June 2020 80 0 23180

July 2020 56 0 23236
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.bb

                               TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT

During the quarter ended March 31, 2001, SBS employed Mr. Grahame Rance as its
President and CEO. The parties have not completed the formal employment
agreement, but have agreed substantially on the following terms:

1.       Mr. Rance is employed as SBS's President and CEO, effective March 9,
         2001, with a signing bonus of $200,000, pretax, and at an initial base
         salary of $500,000. He will also serve as a Director.

2.       SBS will grant Employee 300,000 options, vesting over six years, on SBS
         Common Stock, at an exercise price of $18.125, the closing price on the
         day before Mr. Rance's first day of employment. In addition, Mr. Rance
         will receive an annual grant of options for 40,000 shares of SBS common
         stock, each vesting over two years, at an exercise price equal to fair
         market value on the date of grant.

3.       SBS will provide to Mr. Rance, pretax, additional compensation of $2.4
         million, which will be in the form of a combination of between 30,000
         and 50,000 restricted SBS shares, a loan, and other possible elements.
         The shares will vest, and the loan will be forgiven, over a six-year
         period on the anniversaries of Mr. Rance's employment, and part of the
         shares will vest, and part of the loan be forgiven, upon termination of
         Mr. Rance's employment under certain circumstances. Termination of
         employment by SBS will include six months termination pay at the normal
         annual base pay in effect at the time. If SBS is acquired by another
         organization during the six-year period, the remaining loan amount will
         be forgiven and restrictions on shares will be removed as provided in
         the 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

4.       Mr. Rance will be located in SBS' facility in Carlsbad, California. SBS
         will pay moving and certain home mortgage and home maintenance
         expenses, as well as provide standard and additional employment
         benefits.


SBS and Mr. Rance are in process of negotiating the final employment agreement.
The final agreement is expected to be filed with SBS' Form 10-K on or before
September 28, 2001.