alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>  

                       RELEASE OF IRREVOCABLE PROXY
                        (COUPLED WITH AN INTEREST)

  KNOW ALL MEN  BY THESE  PRESENTS:  that RONALD H. COLE ("Cole") for and
in consideration of good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged by his signature, does hereby fully release, terminate, 
cancel, acquit and forever discharge 250,000 shares of Brown Disc Products 
Company, Inc. ("BD") stock from that certain Irrevocable Proxy (Coupled With
An Interest) dated September 7, 1995 (the "Proxy"), a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A", for the benefit of R. Eugene Rider and Eva
Forsberg-Rider (the "Riders"), which Release shall become effective as set
forth below:

  1.    The release of 50,000 shares shall be effective on the date
        hereof.
  2.    The release of 50,000 shares shall be effective on May 24, 1996.
  3.    The release of 50,000 shares shall be effective on June 24, 1996.
  4.    The release of 50,000 shares shall be effective on July 24, 1996.
  5.    The release of 50,000 shares shall be effective on August 24,
        1996.

  Cole shall cause the Secretary of BD to reissue to the Riders on the
dates specified above, a certificate or certificates evidencing 50,000 shares 
which shares will not contain any restrictive legend upon delivery to counsel
for BD of the certificate currently representing the shares.

  The terms of this Release are contractual in nature and shall bind and
benefit the Riders and Cole, and their respective heirs, personal
representatives, successors and assigns.

  In the event of any dispute between the Riders and Cole concerning this
Release, or in the event of any action to enforce this Release or to collect
damages on account of any breach of the obligation  provided  for  herein, 
the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party, all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in such
litigation as well as all additional costs of collecting any judgement
rendered in such action.

  DATED this 24th day of April, 1996.


                                    /s/  Ronald H. Cole
                                    ----------------------
                                    RONALD H. COLE
# C_2018072EN.01004601.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/46

---

Action brought on 2 January 2018 — Hamburg Beer Company v EUIPO (Hamburg Beer Company)

(Case T-6/18)

(2018/C 072/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hamburg Beer Company GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Hamburg Beer Company’ — Application for registration No 15 272 784

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO 29 September 2017 in Case R 437/2017-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2018161EN.01005802.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/58

---

Action brought on 1 March 2018 — Arkéa Direct Bank and Others v ECB

(Case T-149/18)

(2018/C 161/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Arkéa Direct Bank (Puteaux, France), Caisse de Bretagne de Crédit Mutuel Agricole (Le Relecq Kerhuon, France), Crédit Mutuel Arkéa (Le Relecq Kerhuon), Crédit foncier et communal d’Alsace et de Lorraine-banque (Strasbourg, France), Fédéral Finance (Le Relecq Kerhuon), Arkéa Home Loans SFH (Brest, France), Arkéa Banking Services (Paris, France), Arkéa Public Sector SCF (Le Relecq Kerhuon), Arkéa Banque Entreprises et Institutionnels (Le Relecq Kerhuon), Keytrade Bank Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and P. Kupka, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Article 8 of ECB Decision No ECB/SSM/2017 — 9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of 19 December 2017, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken regarding irrevocable payment commitments in respect of the deposit guarantee schemes or the resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 8 of ECB Decision No ECB/SSM/2017 — 9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of 19 December 2017, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken regarding irrevocable payment commitments in respect of the deposit guarantee schemes or the resolution funds;

| — | order the ECB to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-143/18, Societe Generale v ECB.

Societe Generale

ECB

---
September 8, 2000

22072

#### State v. Quin

Affirmed
18739

#### Slusher v. C.R. Newton, Co., Ltd.

Affirmed
19626

#### State v. Goens

Affirmed
# C_2021349EN.01002601.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Cabello Rondón v Council

(Case T-248/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela - Freezing of funds - Lists of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration - Right to effective judicial protection - Error of assessment - Freedom of expression)

(2021/C 349/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Diosdado Cabello Rondón (Caracas, Venezuela) (represented by: L. Giuliano and F. Di Gianni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou, P. Mahnič, V. Piessevaux and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/90 of 22 January 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 16 I, p. 14) and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1656 of 6 November 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 276, p. 10) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/88 of 22 January 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 16 I, p. 6), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1653 of 6 November 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela (OJ 2018 L 276, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Diosdado Cabello Rondón to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Diosdado Cabello Rondón to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     Exhibit 15


                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP





                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries:


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of 
Education Management Corporation (a Pennsylvania corporation) and Subsidiaries 
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related condensed consolidated 
statements of income for the three- and six- month periods ended December 31, 
1998 and 1997, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the 
six-month periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1997. These financial statements 
are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should 
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in 
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation 
and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998 (not presented herein), and, in our report 
dated August 4, 1998, we expressed an unqualified opinion on that statement. In 
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed 
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 1998, is fairly stated, in all 
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it 
has been derived.




                                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  January 25, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDIT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,037,130
<SECURITIES>                                 2,698,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,918,133
<PP&E>                                         297,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,791,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          439,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        12,387
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,521,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,791,719
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               782,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,725,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               387,295
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,067,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,067,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,067,043)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
No. 333-93787, 333-45547, 333-01951, 033-60051, 033-58329 and 033-58321 on
Form S-8 and No. 333-71205 and 333-67985 on Form S-3 of AmeriSource Health
Corporation, of our report dated November 2, 2000, except for Note 14 as to
which the date is December 18, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of AmeriSource Health Corporation and subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2000.

                                     /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 19, 2000
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.5

                        ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST

BY THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ("Assignment") made and entered into
as of the 29th day of December 2000, AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT L.C., a Texas Limited
Liability Company.,("Assignor"), and 1st Realty Investments, Inc., a Nevada For
Profit Corporation, ("Assignee"), agree as follows:

      1. Assignment. For the amount of $135.00 evidenced by a note for that
amount from Assignee in favor of Assignor, together with other necessary and
agreed upon consideration as set forth below, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby irrevocably sells, transfers and
assigns to Assignee all of its membership interest and participation percentage
in Arizona Legacy Ranches L.L.C. Assignee hereby accepts the assignment and
transfer of the Assignors' membership interest in Arizona Legacy Ranches L.L.C.,
and agrees to assume any and all obligations and responsibilities associated
with such interest from and after the date of this Assignment and hold Assignors
harmless from any and all liabilities relating thereto.

      2. Further Acts: Additional Documents. Assignors and Assignee shall
perform all such further acts and execute and deliver any and all additional
documents and instruments that may be necessary or desirable to consummate,
evidence or confirm the assignment of the interest described herein.

      3. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Assignment has been executed as of the day and
year first above written.

                                            "ASSIGNORS"

                                            AMORTIBANC MANAGEMENT, L.C.
                                            a Texas limited liability company

                                            /s/    Edward W. Dietrich
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name   Edward W. Dietrich
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Title  Vice President
                                            ------------------------------------

                                            "ASSIGNEE"

                                            1st Realty Investments, Inc.
                                            a Nevada For Profit Corporation

                                            /s/    William Szilagyi
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name   William Szilagyi
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Title  President
                                            ------------------------------------
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 12/1/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Florida Department of Environmental 

Protection

SUMMARY: 

The EPA Office of Atmospheric Programs provided information on the Clean Power Plan to the 

Florida Department of Environmental Protection on August 27, 2014. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Erich Eschmann/EPA OAP

External Stakeholders

Cindy Mulkey/FL DEP
# C_2018301EN.01004501.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/45

---

Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Vans v EUIPO (ULTRARANGE)

(Case T-434/18)

(2018/C 301/60)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Vans, Inc. (Costa Mesa, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hirsch and M. Metzner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Mark at issue: EU word mark ULTRARANGE — Application No 16 665 663

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2018 in Case R 2544/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 28, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00469

- CV

Brandi K. Stokes, Appellant

v.

Christopher Lance Corsbie, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E ROSE, JUSTICES FIE LD AND TOTH
AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on July 6, 2017. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
H. Res. 770 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 9, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 5278) to establish an Oversight Board to assist the 

Government of Puerto Rico, including instrumentalities, in 

managing its public finances, and for other purposes. The 

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and amendments specified 

in this section and shall not exceed one hour equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Natural Resources. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources 

now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an 

original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five- 
2 

•HRES 770 EH 

minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114–57. That 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against that amendment in the 

nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment to that 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 

Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in 

the nature of a substitute made in order as original text. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
3 

•HRES 770 EH 

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon passage of H.R. 5278 the House shall be 

considered to have: (1) stricken all after the enacting clause 

of S. 2328 and inserted in lieu thereof the provisions of H.R. 

5278, as passed by the House; and (2) passed the Senate bill 

as so amended. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
17860

#### State v. Jim

February 18, 1997

Order No. 97-15

Vacated and Remanded
##### 



Three Months EndedMarch 31,2008
    
    
    2007Basic Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    1,001,760
    
    
    $
    814,512Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,444,597
    
    
    
    2,487,087Basic Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.41
    
    
    $
    0.33Diluted Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    1,001,760
    
    
    $
    814,512Weighted average
common shares
    
    
    2,444,597
    
    
    
    2,487,087Weighted average effect of
assumed stock options
    
    
    45
    
    
    
    Total
    
    
    2,444,642
    
    
    
    2,487,087Diluted Earnings
Per Share
    
    $
    0.41
    
    
    $
    0.33
 20.