alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheets of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, andthe related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analyticalprocedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objectiveof which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred toabove for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as ofJune 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented herein and in our report dated September 12, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion onthose consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balancesheet from which it has been derived. 

 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

April 21, 2006
June 2022

There were 12 surveillance inspections conducted at 12 different sites for a total of 

104 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures continued to rise in response to the warmer

air temperatures. All sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and were 

scheduled for monthly sampling. Routine harvest continued and spring stocking was 

completed. No cages were confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

July 2021 110 0 23967

August 2021 122 0 24089

September 2021 99 0 24188

October 2021 84 0 24272

November 2021 89 0 24361

December 2021 80 0 24441

January 2022 80 0 24521

February 2022 90 0 24611

March 2022 98 0 24709

April 2022 69 0 24778

May 2022 55 0 24833

June 2022 104 0 24937
# C_2020215EN.01001702.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — JC v Kreissparkasse Saarlouis

(Case C-66/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2008/48/EC - Credit agreements for consumers - Right of withdrawal - Time limit for the exercise of that right - Requirements concerning the information to be included in a credit agreement - Information notice merely referring to a series of national provisions)

(2020/C 215/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Saarbrücken

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JC

Defendant: Kreissparkasse Saarlouis

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 10(2)(p) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that the information to be specified, in a clear and concise manner, in a credit agreement in accordance with that provision includes information on how the period of withdrawal, provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 14(1) of that directive, is to be calculated. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 10(2)(p) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that the information to be specified, in a clear and concise manner, in a credit agreement in accordance with that provision includes information on how the period of withdrawal, provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 14(1) of that directive, is to be calculated.

| 2. | Article 10(2)(p) of Directive 2008/48 must be interpreted as precluding a credit agreement from making reference, as regards the information referred to in Article 10 of that directive, to a provision of national law which itself refers to other legislative provisions of the Member State in question. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 10(2)(p) of Directive 2008/48 must be interpreted as precluding a credit agreement from making reference, as regards the information referred to in Article 10 of that directive, to a provision of national law which itself refers to other legislative provisions of the Member State in question.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.

---
#### Doe, In Re: Jane (DOB 3/5/91)

18240

4/29/97

Affirmed
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                 Subsidiaries of
                      Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc.
                              At December 31, 2002

         (The state of incorporation or organization of each subsidiary
                          is Virginia, except as noted)


A.       Direct Subsidiaries

         CRIT-SC, Inc.
         CRIT-SC, LLC
         CRIT Special, Inc.
         CRIT Special II, Inc.
         CRIT Special III, Inc.
         CRIT-VA, Inc.
         CRIT-VA II, Inc.
         CRIT-VA III, Inc.
         CRIT-VA IV, Inc.
         CRIT-VA V, Inc.
         CRIT-VA VI, Inc.
         Cornerstone Acquisition Company
         Cornerstone NC Operating Limited Partnership
         CRIT General, Inc.
         CRIT Holdings, L.P.

B.       Indirect Subsidiaries (held through direct subsidiaries or other
         indirect subsidiaries)

         Apple General, Inc.
         Apple Limited, Inc.
         Apple REIT Limited Partnership
         Apple REIT II Limited Partnership
         Apple REIT III Limited Partnership
         Apple REIT IV Limited Partnership
         Apple REIT V Limited Partnership
         Apple REIT VI Limited Partnership
         Apple REIT VII Limited Partnership

         CRIT-Cornerstone Limited Partnership
         CRIT-NC, LLC
         CRIT-NC II, LLC *
         CRIT-NC III, LLC *
         CRIT-NC IV, LLC *


(continued...)

<PAGE>

         CAC Special General, Inc.
         CAC Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC Limited Partnership
         CAC II Special General, Inc.
         CAC II Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC II Limited Partnership
         CAC III Special General, Inc.
         CAC III Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC III Limited Partnership
         CAC IV Special General, Inc.
         CAC IV Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC IV Limited Partnership
         CAC V Special General, Inc.
         CAC V Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC V Limited Partnership
         CAC VI Special General, Inc.
         CAC VI Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC VI Limited Partnership
         CAC VII Special General, Inc.
         CAC VII Special Limited, Inc.
         CAC VII Limited Partnership

         St. Andrews Place Apartments, LLC **
         Trinity Commons Apartments, LLC **
         Timber Crest Apartments, LLC **
         St. Andrews Place II, LLC **
         Trinity Commons II, LLC **
         Autumn Park Apartments, LLC **
         Legacy Park Apartments, LLC **

------------------

*    State of organization is Delaware.
**   State of organization is North Carolina.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian Randolph JOHNSON, a/k/a Zaafir Siefullah Saafir and Julian Alonzo Crim, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50142.

D.C. No. CR-04-00545-JFW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Steve Kim, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Suzanne M. Lachelier, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Julian Randolph Johnson appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of 12 months and 1 day for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Johnson has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 829 

Expressing support for completion of President Obama’s Export Control Reform Initiative, which will fundamentally reform the United States export 

control system and enhance United States national security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2016 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself and Mr. MARINO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for completion of President Obama’s Export Control Reform Initiative, which will fundamentally 

reform the United States export control system and enhance United States national security. 

Whereas the United States export control system is highly 

flawed and limits the competitiveness of American businesses in the global marketplace; 

Whereas the United States export control system currently is 

enforced by multiple overlapping agencies utilizing separate and often redundant information technology systems; 

Whereas President Obama undertook an interagency review 

of the United States export control system in 2009 with 

the goal of doubling United States exports within 5 

years; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 829 IH 

Whereas review of the Bureau of Industry and Security’s 

Commerce Control List and the Directorate of Defense 

Trade Controls’ United States Munitions List is part of 

phase one of President Obama’s Export Control Reform 

Initiative; 

Whereas 18 of the 21 categories on the United States Munitions List have begun the transition from the Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls to 

the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and 

Security’s Commerce Control List; 

Whereas the remaining 3 categories still remain under regulation by the Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls with no indication of movement 

since 2013; 

Whereas the remaining 3 categories represent an opportunity 

to increase United States competition in a rapidly increasing global marketplace and grow United States exports without impacting national security; and 

Whereas American manufacturers face a competitive disadvantage, which limits the ability of manufacturers to 

grow their businesses here at home: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports President Obama’s Export Control 

3 Reform Initiative; 

4 (2) recognizes the economic burden imposed on 

5 those United States Munitions List categories that 

6 remain unnecessarily regulated by the Department 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 829 IH 

1 of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls; 

2 and 

3 (3) encourages publication of proposed rules to 

4 shift the remaining United States Munitions List 

5 categories to the Department of Commerce’s Bureau 

6 of Industry and Security’s Commerce Control List 

7 by the end of 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
20746

#### Perez v. Perez

Affirmed
H. Res. 673 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 19, 2016. 

Whereas each year, Internal Revenue Service Publication 17, 

entitled ‘‘Your Federal Income Tax’’, provides individuals 

with general instructions on how to file their tax returns 

for the previous taxable year; 

Whereas in each year prior to 2015, free printed versions of 

Internal Revenue Service Publication 17 were made widely available to taxpayers at libraries, post offices, and 

taxpayer service offices, and even by mail at the request 

of a taxpayer; 

Whereas the Internal Revenue Service no longer disseminates 

a free printed version of Internal Revenue Service Publication 17 as it transitions to a fully electronic tax filing 

system, including an electronic system for providing instructions on filing tax returns; 

Whereas the Internal Revenue Service directs taxpayers to 

the Internet to download an electronic version of Internal 

Revenue Service Publication 17, even though the limited 

availability of a printed version of this publication burdens individuals who do not have access to a computer 

or printer and individuals who struggle to navigate a 

computer; 
2 

•HRES 673 EH 

Whereas the dissemination of printed copies of Internal Revenue Service Publication 17 is a basic taxpayer service 

that the Internal Revenue Service is ignoring; 

Whereas the Internal Revenue Service should prioritize its resources on areas that are critical to the ability of taxpayers to file their tax returns in a timely and proper 

manner; 

Whereas the decision of the Internal Revenue Service to stop 

disseminating printed copies of Internal Revenue Service 

Publication 17 adversely impacts populations that do not 

have access to, or understand how to use, a computer, 

and the decision unnecessarily burdens and restricts the 

ability of taxpayers to comply with the convoluted and 

complicated provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986; and 

Whereas Internal Revenue Service Publication 17 is clear evidence of the need for comprehensive tax reform that simplifies the Internal Revenue Code so that individuals can 

complete their tax returns and pay their taxes without 

needing the nearly 300 pages of instructions that currently make up Publication 17: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges the 

Internal Revenue Service to— 

(1) resume printing copies of Internal Revenue 

Service Publication 17; and 
3 

•HRES 673 EH 

(2) provide free copies of such publication to the 

taxpayers of the United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION****Pursuant to 18 United States Code §1350**
     The undersigned hereby certifies that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2003 of Fisher Scientific International Inc. (the“Company”) filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
 /s/ KEVIN P. CLARK      Kevin P. Clark     *Chief Financial Officer*
July 31, 2003
     A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto Fisher Scientific International Inc. and will be retained by itand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
# C_2018399EN.01005802.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/58

---

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2018 — Reiner Stemme Utility Air Systems v AESA

(Case T-371/18) (1)

(2018/C 399/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2016.

---
# C_2019246EN.01002502.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/25

---

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2019 — Telemark plus v EUIPO (Telemarkfest)

(Case T-719/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Telemarkfest - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 246/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Telemark plus eV (Altusried, Germany) (represented by: S. Schenk, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2018 (Case R 346/2018-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Telemarkfest as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Telemark plus eV shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Telemark plus eV shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.

---
October 2021 

There were 8 surveillance inspections conducted at 8 different sites for a total of 84

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. The water temperatures began to decrease in response to the colder

air temperatures. All sites with fish in the water remained Category 1 and were 

scheduled for monthly sampling. Routine harvest continued. No cages were 

confirmed positive this month.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

November 2020 35 0 23416

December 2020 45 0 23461

January 2021 45 0 23506

February 2021 45 0 23551

March 2021 46 0 23597

April 2021 50 0 23647

May 2021 90 0 23737

June 2021 120 0 23857

July 2021 110 0 23967

August 2021 122 0 24089

September 2021 99 0 24188

October 2021 84 0 24272
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27501]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2023-25488]


Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Random drug and alcohol testing percentage rates of covered 
aviation employees for the period January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 17, 2023, the Federal Aviation Administration 
(FAA) published the Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of 
Covered Aviation Employees for the Period January 1, 2024 to December 
31, 2024. In that document, the FAA inadvertently provided incorrect 
years in the supplementary information section. This document corrects 
that error.

DATES: This correction is effective December 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, 
Program Policy Branch; Email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acc8ded9cbcdcecdd8c9c1c9c2d8eccacdcd82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99fdebecfef8fbf8edfcf4fcf7edd9fff8f8b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>; Telephone (202) 
267-8442.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 17, 2023, the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) published the Random Drug and Alcohol Testing 
Percentage Rates of Covered Aviation Employees for the Period January 
1, 2024 to December 31, 2024; Corrections. In the second column, third 
paragraph under the supplementary section of the document, the year 
appeared as 2023 instead of 2024. In the third column, first paragraph 
under the supplementary section of the document, the year appeared as 
2022 instead of 2024. This document corrects that error.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register of November 17, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-
25488, on page 80376, in the second column, the year 2023 in the 
thirty-first line in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section should be 
2024.
    In the Federal Register of November 17, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-
25488, on page 80376, in the third column, the year 2022 in the third 
line in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section should be 2024.

Docket No. FAA-2023-25488

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Virginia Lozada,
Acting Director, Drug Abatement Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27501 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 18, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1293

Lower Tribunal No. 14-20171 

________________

Gila Tsiony-Barron,

Appellant,

vs.

Douglas Barron,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria 

Elena Verde, Judge.

Sandy T. Fox, P.A., and Sandy T. Fox and Alisha B. Savani, for 

appellant.

Davis Smith & Jean, LLC, and Laura Davis Smith and Sonja A. Jean, 

for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed.