Michae l Selig , MD , FACC, CFI- H . -5|lS, o "tCE l VE D 281 6 0refieldRoa d " Ui^LHAt.UJ i j^ ^ j 3 ^g^

j Allentown , PA . 1810 4 .^.^ .,^^ , , ^ p ^,^ Q HEARIN G DOCKE T U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Cynthi a Dominik , Laur a Ponto , ^^ cSmpk,ina'?i't s Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r V . Federa l Docket . No : 2010-121 1 M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden tC. f|i>S()Oc>l l

RESPONDENT' S MOTIO N FO R JUDGMEN TT O DISMIS S FAILUR E TO PROPERL

YRESPON D O R MEE

TFILIN G DEADLINE S AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , CFI-H , principl e fo rM & R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g MOTIO N FO R JUDGMEN Tsinc e th e complainant s hav e faile d t o respon d o ranswe rfilin g deadline s i n accordanc e t o §13.218(d ) an d whe n complainant s di d respon d faile d t o plea d fact s wit h sufficien t specificit yan d therefor e shoul d b e dismisse d accordin g t o Rule s 101 9 an d 1028(a)(3) , therefor e furthe rreaso n fo rcomplain tt o b e sticken . 1 . Throughou tthi s litigation , th e complainant s hav e refuse d t o addres s specifi cnumerate d paragraph s i n breac h o f§ 206.2 . 12 . Throughou tthi s litigation , complainant s hav e no t pleate d fact s wit h

sufficien tspecificit yan d i n accordanc e t o standar d practice s o fRule s 101 9 an d 1028(a)(3) . Th e purpos e o fth e rul e is t o confin e th e pleadin g part yproo ft o onl y thos e act s alleged , thu s enablin g a respondin g part yt o prepar e thei rdefense ^ 3 . Throughou tthi s litigation , complainant s continue d t o fil e lat e response s t o motion s pas tth e 1 0 da ydeadlin e perio d unde r§ Rul e 13.218(d) , fo r example , no tusin g actua l dote s o fservic e i n attempt s t o impai rth e dignit yo f thi s court . 4 . Th e Respondent s Motio n t o Quash , Strik e o rDismis s Complaint , wit h associate d brie fwa s faxe d (Exhibi t fa xconfirmatio n sheet ) an d sen t t o M rPonte s departmen to n Novembe r29 , 2010 . Th e du e dat e wa s December? , 2010 . A n objectio n o rrespons e wa s no treceive d o rserve d unti l Decembe r13 , 2010 , pos t th e du e dat e unde r§ Rul e 13.218(d ) (Exhibi t 1) . 5 . M s Domini k

o fth e FA

Aenforcemen tdivisio n o fth e chie fcounse l calle d responden tdirectl yadmittin g tha tth e complainant s di d no tfil e response s withi n th e 1 0 da ydeadlin e period , wer e i n breac h o fthi s regulatio n an d thereb yrequeste d a continuance . Exhibi t2 show s cal l lo g o frespondent' s telephon e showin g M s Dominik s numbe r202-267-7560 . 6 . Responden trefuse d a continuanc e an d requeste d th e cas e b e dismisse d o n thes e grounds . 7 . O n Novembe r30 , 2010 , a respondent s motio n t o Strik e Allegatio n wa s 'Bake r vRanges , 32 4 A.2 d 498 , 50 5 (P a Supe r Ct . 197 4 

### -2 -faxe d an d sen tt o M s Ponto s departmen tt o whic h n o objectio n o ranswe rwa s

receive d withi n th e 1 0 da ydeadlin e unde r§ Rul e 13.218(d ) (Exhibi t3-fa x confirmatio n sheet ) (Exhibi t4) . Alat e answe rwa s als o provide d i n th e correspondenc e receive d o n Decembe r13 , 2010 . 11 . Ther e is n o reaso n fo rcounse l t o no tb e abl e t o respon d t o an yo f th e abov e deadlin e date s i n accordanc e t o th e FA ARule s o fCivi l Penalt y Proceeding s 1 4 C.F.R . §13.1 6 an d subpar t G , a s th e Offic e o fChie fCounse l employ s man yattorneys , handle s thousand s o fviolation s yearl yan d therefor e alternative s ar e readil yavailabl e t o cove ro rsubstitut e fo rvacation , illnes s o r othe rreasons . 12 . Thi s cas e doe s no thav e exclusiv e authorit yo fonl yM s Ponto , a s ther e hav e alread ybee n othe rintervenin g attorney s tha thav e reviewe d o r bee n involve d i n th e cose , includin g Pete rLynch , Esq. , (lette rOctobe r21 , 2010 , (exhibi t1) , Charle s Roley , Esq . (Octobe r1 , 201 0 telephon e hearing , transcript s outstanding) , M s Cynthi a Dominik , Esq . (Telephon e col l Decembers , 2010) , therefore , ther e is n o excus e o rreaso n fo rlat e filin g o fobjection s o ranswers , no t addressin g al l numerate d paragraph s o rusin g sufficien tspecificit yi n thei r pleading s unde ran ypremis e fo ral l th e abov e documents . WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l gran tth e Motio n fo rjudgmen tt o dismis s th e cos e du e t o lat e filin g an d othe rprocedura l defect s i n accordanc e t o Rule s 13.218(d) , § 101 9 an d 1028(a)(3 ) an d § 206. 2

### 1 Respectfull ySubmitted , , , > I Michae l B. Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H ' 0-* ^ I Dat e

# mmm

M

^ m a •*M i TM««»-»"^-5««!(lK* . 

# "^mmMi r mmmm iMichaelSelig , MD , FACC . f^ W^l'-''"^ ' - )

281 6 Orefiel d Roo d _, ^ 0 - ^ ^ ' Allentown , PA . 1810 4 p^jj>$ M >^ ^ 9<t'''' " U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Latony o William s Complainant s FA ACase : No : 2009SO95043 4 V . M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t

RESPONDENT' S MOTIO N T O STRIK E ALLEGATION M R BAKE R WAS NOTO N ADRUG/ALCOHO LPROGRA M AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH) , (n o longe rexisting ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g MOTIO N t o Strik e th e Allegatio n claime d b yM s Latony o William s tha tMrBake rwa s no to n o n approve d Drug/Alcoho l progra m durin g th e state d period . 1 . O n Jul y21 , 2009 , FA AOfficers , Latony o William s an d Kimm yPoo n appeare d fo ra n inspectio n o fth e dru g an d alcoho l abatemen trecord s a t th e prio roffic e o fM R Helicopters , LLC . 2 . O n Jul y23 , 2009 , FA AOfficer , Latony o William s returne d alon e fo rth e

o f3U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Cynthi a Dominik , Laur a Ponto , Lotony a William s Complainant s M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t V . Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : 2010-121 1 CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I HEREB YCERTIF Ytina tI inav e thi s da yserve d th e foregoin g entrie(s) : RESPONDENT' S MOTIO N FO R JUDGMEN TT O DISMIS S FAILUR E TO PROPERL

YRESPON D O R MEE

TFILIN G DEADLINE S upo n al l partie s o frecor d i n thi s proceeding , i n accordanc e wit h th e requirement s o fRul e 2 9 pursuan tt o 2 8 U . S . C . § 174 6 . Sen/ic e b vfirst-clas s mail , postag e prepaid , addresse d as follows :

\ X Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu rWrigh t Avenue-Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Att : Hearin g Docke tClerk , AGC-43 0 FA X20 2 49 3 514 2 Cynthi a Dominik , Esq . Enforcemen t Division/AGC-30 0 Offic e o fth e Chie fCounse l FA A 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 t^FAX20 2 26 7 510 6 By : Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . 2B1 6 0refieldRoa d Allentown , Pa . 1810 4 61 0 36 0 395 3 Date : 

### ^ v . ^ Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yode r

U S Departmen to fTransportatio n Offic e o fHearings , M-20 , Roo m E l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue . S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 / , FA X20 2 36 6 753 6

V , ^ - ^ 

## A \ j