alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018134EN.01002202.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/22

---

Action brought on 30 January 2018 — Kleani v Court of Justice

(Case T-51/18)

(2018/C 134/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Efterpi Kleani (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: S. Tassi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Court of Justice of 23 November 2017 (reference 20172046) rejecting the applicant’s tender submitted in respect of the freelance translator contract notice 2017/S 002-001564 for the Greek language. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Court of Justice of 23 November 2017 (reference 20172046) rejecting the applicant’s tender submitted in respect of the freelance translator contract notice 2017/S 002-001564 for the Greek language.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant maintains that the contested decision was not accompanied by either a determinate set of criteria establishing the quality level of translations requested in the tender procedure or any kind of a correction sheet or a comparative report which might substantiate why, in the defendant’s view, the test translation submitted by the applicant failed to attain the minimum benchmark required. The applicant argues, in that regard, that the contested decision was not properly reasoned and that the selection procedure lacked transparency.

---
Plant Protection and Quarantine

Have You Spotted a Spotted Lanternfly?

Favorite Hangout

Despite its unique appearance, people sometimes confuse the spotted lanternfly with other insects. Here’s how to 

know if you’ve seen a spotted lanternfly.

One of the best places to look for a spotted lanternfly 

is on a tree of heaven. This tree’s bark ranges from 

light brown to gray and has a cantaloupe-like texture. 

Its leaves are large, from 1 to 4 feet in length. They are 

made up of many smaller leaflets on both sides of a 

central stem.

If You See Something, Say Something!

The spotted lanternfly is bad for our farms and forests. Visit HungryPests.com to see where it’s been found. If you 

find this pest in a State known to have the spotted lanternfly, take a picture, note the location, and report it to your 

State department of agriculture before killing it. If you think you’ve found this pest in a new State, capture one (they 

won’t hurt you), place it in a jar, and freeze it so your State agriculture officials can identify it. 

Tree of Heaven Tree of Heaven 

bark

Tree of Heaven 

leaves

Learn More: www.aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slf

ACTUAL SIZE: 1" ACTUAL SIZE: 1"

ACTUAL SIZE: 1/2" ACTUAL SIZE: 1/8"–1/4"

Egg Mass: Often looks like cracked mud Early Nymph: Black with white spots

Late Nymph: Red with white spots and black stripes

Adult: Light brown front wings with black spots Adult: Red back wings with black spots and black-and-white bands
Is That a Spotted Lanternfly?

People sometimes mistake these colorful insects for the spotted lanternfly.

Photo Credits: Spotted lanternfly and egg mass images courtesy of Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture; nymphs image by USDA; ilia underwing by 

Sturgis McKeever, Georgia Southern University, Bugwood; all others by Adobe Stock.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

APHIS-22-034 | Issued June 2022 | Revised July 2023

Learn More: www.aphis.usda.gov/hungrypests/slf

Ailanthus Webworm Moth (Atteva aurea) Tiger Moth (Arctia caja)

Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) Cinnabar Moth (Tyria jacobaeae)

White-Lined Sphinx Ilia Underwing (Catocala ilia) (Hyles lineata)

Boxelder Bug (Boisea trivittata) Large Milkweed Bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus)
# C_2018445EN.01002301.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/23

---

Action brought on 18 October 2018 — Gres de Aragón/EUIPO (GRES ARAGÓN)

(Case T-624/18)

(2018/C 445/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Gres de Aragón (Alcalñiz, Spain) (represented by: J. Learte Álvarez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Application for registration No 16 311 938

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 August 2018 in Case R 2269/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision refusing European Union trade mark application No 16 311 938 GRES ARAGÓN in connection with some of the goods/services covered by the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision refusing European Union trade mark application No 16 311 938 GRES ARAGÓN in connection with some of the goods/services covered by the application;

| — | Resume the processing of the application in respect of all the goods and services covered by the original application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Resume the processing of the application in respect of all the goods and services covered by the original application;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), and Article 7(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Strategy and Policy

Live Animal Imports

4700 River Road

Unit 39

Riverdale, MD 20737

(301) 851-3000

October 28,2020

Notice Regarding APHIS Import Permits for Equine Imports from CEM 

Affected Regions

USDA APHIS would like to bring to your attention the following issue regarding 

import permits for horses imported from regions APHIS considers to be 

Contagious Equine Metritis (CEM) affected. 

Effective January 1, 2021, the following will apply at all ports of entry for all 

horses imported from CEM affected regions.

In accordance with Title 9 Code of Federal Regulations part 93.304 (9 CFR 

93.304), horses entering the United States from (CEM) affected regions must 

obtain an APHIS import permit prior to arrival. This includes intact mares and 

stallions, geldings and yearlings. 

USDA has not enforced this permit requirement for geldings and yearlings when 

quarantined at a federal facility. However, we recognize the concerns and issues 

this inconsistency causes for port personnel preparing for and processing each 

shipment and for importers which use both federal and approved private quarantine 

facilities.

APHIS is committed to providing efficient customer service and consistent 

practices and procedures at all ports of entry. 

Beginning January 1, 2021, an APHIS import permit must be obtained for all horses 

imported from CEM affected regions including intact mares and stallions, geldings 

and yearlings regardless of where import quarantine is completed. Permit 

applications may be submitted through the electronic ePermit System, or by email 

to VS.Live.Animals.Import.Permits@usda.gov. Standard processing times for 

routine permit applications is 7-10 business days. Permit applications for more 

complex imports not managed by the ports of entry will take longer to process. 

USDA encourages you to share this notice of information with your equine import 

customers and shipping agents in exporting countries. 

For further information about import permit requirements please visit the USDA 

APHIS VS Live Animal Imports website or contact Live Animal Imports at (301) 

851-3300.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Percentage                State of
Subsidiaries (1)                                               Owned                Incorporation
----------------                                            ----------              -------------
<S>                                                         <C>                     <C>
Ameriana Savings Bank, F.S.B. (2)                              100%                 United States

Deer Park Federal Savings and Loan Association (2)             100%                 United States

Indiana Title Insurance Company (2)                            100%                 Indiana

Ameriana Financial Services, Inc. (3)                          100%                 Indiana

Ameriana Insurance Agency, Inc. (4)                            100%                 Indiana

Family Financial Life (5)                                       19%                 Louisiana

Deer Park Service Corporation (6)                              100%                 Ohio
</TABLE>

--------------------
(1)      Operations of the Company's wholly-owned direct subsidiaries, the Bank,
         the Association and Indiana Title, and the Bank's wholly-owned
         subsidiary, AFS, are included in the Company's consolidated financial
         statements attached as an exhibit to the Annual Report.

(2)      First-tier subsidiary of the Company.

(3)      Second-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Bank, a first-
         tier subsidiary of the Company.

(4)      Third-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by AFS, a second-tier
         subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Bank, a first-tier
         subsidiary of the Company.

(5)      Third-tier subsidiary of the Company 1/10 owned through stock
         investment and less than 1/10 owned through partnership interests of
         AFS, a second-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Bank, a
         first-tier subsidiary of the Company.

(6)      Second-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Association, a
         first-tier subsidiary of the Company.
*Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

 

No. 00-60217

 

MICHAEL A. OGDEN

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

No. 00-60220

 

MICHAEL A. OGDEN; COLLEEN OGDEN,

Petitioners-Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeals from a Decision of the United States Tax Court

 

March 20, 2001

Before: FARRIS*, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
 

2 On April 26, 2000, the court granted the parties' joint motion to consolidate appeals.

2

Michael A. Ogden and Colleen Ogden appeal the decision of the tax court

denying their petitions for redetermination of federal taxes and imposing an

accuracy-related penalty.2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 

§ 7482(a), and we affirm.

We review for clear error the tax court's profit motive inquiry, see Westbrook

v. Commissioner, 68 F.3d 868, 876 (5th Cir. 1995), and determination of negligence

for an accuracy-related penalty, see id. at 880. Clear error exists when this court is

left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. See

Chamberlain v. Commissioner, 66 F.3d 729, 732 (5th Cir. 1995).

We have carefully reviewed the record following skillful and persuasive oral

argument by counsel for the petitioner. We agree that the tax court was not

compelled to enter the findings that it made. Our review, however, is to determine

whether these findings are supported by the record. They are. There is, on this

record, no basis for a firm conviction that an error has been made. 

The record supports the finding that the Ogdens' objective was not profit but

to purchase household goods and make financial deductions to offset their wage

income. We therefore affirm the tax court's determination of tax liability. See
3

Westbrook, 68 F.3d at 875-76.

Contrary to the Ogdens' contention, evidence of profit is not determinative of

whether a profit motive exists. See id. at 876 (no single tax regulation factor, nor

the existence of a majority of factors, is determinative of whether a profit motive

exists). There is overwhelming evidence in the record that, if believed, supports a

conclusion that the Ogdens maintained their Amway activity for deductions,

personal pleasure and to offset wages. The tax court did not abuse its discretion in

denying the motion for reconsideration. See id.

The record supports the finding that the Ogdens failed to comply with

provisions of the Internal Revenue laws, failed to exercise due care by continuing

with an unprofitable endeavor, and maintained unbusinesslike records. We affirm

the tax court's imposition of an accuracy-related penalty. See Westbrook, 68 F.3d at

880-81.

AFFIRMED.
#### In re Application of BESTWAY FREIGHT LINES, Inc., for Class “A” Freight Intrastate.

No. 37380.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 19, 1957.

*962W. T. Brunson, Charles D. Dudley, Oklahoma City, for complainant, Bestway Freight Lines, Inc.

Sidney P. Upsher, Oklahoma City, for respondent, Sooner Freight Lines, Inc.

HALLEY, Justice.

The identical questions of law are involved here as in In re Complaint of Bestway Freight Lines, Inc., v. Sooner Freight Lines, Inc., Okl., 308 P.2d 959, dismissed because appeal was not lodged in this Court within the time provided by Section 972, 12 O.S.1951. The opinion in that case, including the syllabi, is hereby adopted as the opinion in this case and for the reasons therein stated, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the Third
Quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Fisher Scientific International Inc. (the Company) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Paul M. MontronePaul M. MontroneChief Executive Officer
March 16, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fisher Scientific International Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
18642

#### Tice v. Hoff

Affirmed
#### Arlilian WATSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12597.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 3, 1958.

King & Wadlington, Ada, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

NIX, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Arlilian Watson, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was charged by information in the County Court of Pontotoc County with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. She was tried before a jury, found guilty and her punishment was assessed at 90 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100, and from said judgment and sentence the defendant appeals. Counsel recites numerous contentions of error, but devotes his argument and discussion to one proposition of error: That the penalty was excessive and unreasonable and not warranted by the evidence.

The record presents a brief and simple case. It reflects that Tollie Bogan, Agent *866for the State Crime Bureau, went to the house of the defendant in the city of Ada and purchased from her one pint of wildcat whisky for which he paid her the sum of $2. The pint of whisky was taken from the place of purchase to the home of the county attorney, left for evidence to be used at the trial.

W. B. Ward, Jr., County Attorney, substantiated Agent Bogan’s testimony as to delivery to him of the pint of wildcat whisky, which he stated was marked for identification and had been in his possession since the date of purchase by the Crime Bureau agent.

With the testimony of these two witnesses, the state rested. The defendant interposed a demurrer which was overruled, and then rested without presenting any testimony whatsoever. The jury found the defendant guilty and assessed the punishment as heretofore related.

A review of the record convinces your writer that the evidence was sufficient to prove the crime as charged. The defendant presented no evidence to refute the charges. Under the law of this state, the punishment prescribed for the unlawful sale of liquor ranges from a minimum fine of $50 to a maximum of $500 and by imprisonment for not less than 30 days, nor more than 6 months in the county jail. Tit. 37 O.S.A. § 1.

Under the statute, the jury could have set the fine at five times as much and the imprisonment twice as long. Evidently they considered the evidence and reached a happy medium which does not appear unreasonable to the court. The record has been carefully examined and no justifiable grounds are found for reversal or modification.

The case is therefore affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 825 

Recognizing the increased risk of sleep apnea among soldiers returning from 

active duty and the benefits of continuous positive airway pressure 

(CPAP) therapy on treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in soldiers 

suffering from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2016 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the increased risk of sleep apnea among soldiers 

returning from active duty and the benefits of continuous 

positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in soldiers suffering from 

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). 

Whereas 12 to 18 million people in the United States remain 

untreated for (OSA); 

Whereas untreated OSA can lead to heart disease, stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and depression; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 825 IH 

Whereas 54 percent of the patients with PTSD who underwent sleep studies at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center were diagnosed with OSA; 

Whereas 20 percent of soldiers will develop sleep apnea in 

their lifetime; 

Whereas soldiers are 4 times more likely to develop sleep 

apnea than non-veteran civilians; 

Whereas studies show that 37 percent of soldiers showing 

symptoms for PTSD also report symptoms of insufficient 

sleep; 

Whereas veterans suffering from PTSD experience fewer 

nightmares when their OSA is treated with continuous 

positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy; and 

Whereas the lack of public awareness of the disease, poor 

sleep habits during active duty, and the effects of PTSD 

among veterans that lead to poor sleep leads to many 

undiagnosed, untreated, and severe cases: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports raising public awareness of sleep 

3 apnea, especially for United States soldiers and vet4 erans; 

5 (2) supports providing access to care for sol6 diers and veterans with sleep illnesses such as ob7 structive sleep apnea (OSA); 

8 (3) encourages all United States soldiers and 

9 veterans to seek and maintain healthy sleep habits 

10 both during and after active duty; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 825 IH 

1 (4) further explores continuous positive airway 

2 pressure (CPAP) as a viable treatment for OSA in 

3 patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 

4 (PTSD). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5212]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, the Chair 
will postpone further proceedings today on the motion to suspend the 
rules on which a recorded vote or the yeas and nays are ordered, or on 
which the vote incurs objection under clause 6 of rule XX.
  Any record vote on the postponed question will be taken later.

                          ____________________
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07728 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description** 


### x 07728\07728_012811 Communication.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response 

### x 07728\07728_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07728\07728_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07728\07728_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07728\07728_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07728\07728_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07728\07728_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07728\07728_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07728\07728_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_D2-3 Attachment -- Phase I Mercury Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_D4-22 Laskin Cell A-D Closure Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_Final Pilot Testing Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_Laskin Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_Laskin Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_LEC Water Balance Diagram Pond-1,Ret-Pond-1,WWT-1, WT-A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_LEC Water Diagram D-2 Additional .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_Water Balance Flow diagram Pond 1, WWT-1,WT-A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 07728\Supplemental Documents\07728_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.