alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019295EN.01002702.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Arbuzov v Council

(Case T-284/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

(2019/C 295/35)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Sergej Arbuzov (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Pekař and P. Mahnič, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 48) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 5), in so far as the applicant’s name was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as Mr Sergej Arbuzov’s name was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as Mr Sergej Arbuzov’s name was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,009
<SECURITIES>                                    29,526
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                       489
<INVENTORY>                                      2,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,861
<PP&E>                                          12,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,797
<BONDS>                                         69,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,525
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,922
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    89
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    406
<INCOME-TAX>                                       158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 50 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 370 

[Report No. 114–223] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3009) to amend section 241(i) 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny assistance under such 

section to a State or political subdivision of a State that prohibits 

its officials from taking certain actions with respect to immigration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2015 

Mr. COLLINS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3009) to amend 

section 241(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

to deny assistance under such section to a State or 

political subdivision of a State that prohibits its officials 

from taking certain actions with respect to immigration. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3009) to amend section 241(i) of the Immigration and 

4 Nationality Act to deny assistance under such section to 

5 a State or political subdivision of a State that prohibits 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 370 RH 

1 its officials from taking certain actions with respect to im2 migration. All points of order against consideration of the 

3 bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All 

4 points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. 

5 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

6 the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 

7 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

8 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

9 minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 

10 (2) one motion to recommit. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 50 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 370 

[Report No. 114–223] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3009) 

tain actions with respect to immigration. State that prohibits its officials from taking cersection to a State or political subdivision of a Nationality Act to deny assistance under such to amend section 241(i) of the Immigration and 

JULY 22, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-006

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

Bear Husbandry and Habitat

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about bear health and care.

Refer to the other topics covered in the series for more information on bear care.

PRACTICAL TIP

Soil, grass, gravel, 

sand, leaves, hay, 

and mulch are good 

substrate options to use 

in bear enclosures.

DID YOU KNOW?

Bears use marking as a 

way to communicate 

with other animals by 

both sight and smell. 

Why is the environment important to bear health and well-being?

All bear species dig, climb, swim, and den. Offering bears ways to engage in these 

natural behaviors is crucial to their health and well-being in captivity. 

DIG

NATURAL SUBSTRATE

l Allows bears to dig

l Is softer and easier on joints

l Enables bears to build nests from

leaves and branches

l Encourages bears to explore when

there’s a variety of substrates

CLIMB

CLIMBING STRUCTURES

l Create opportunities for

exercise and exploration

l Create high vantage points

for bears to rest, offering

both enrichment and a sense

of security

SWIM

WATER FEATURES 

l Allow swimming or bathing

l Help bears regulate their

body temperature

l Promote play and overall

movement

DEN

QUICK TIPS

l Individual dens for adult bears help

reduce aggression and competition

l Proper bedding in dens increases

bears’ comfort and well-being

l Comfortable temperatures in dens

are vital for bears’ health

HABITAT

Allowing bears access to areas that are shady 

throughout the day helps bears to cool off 

and maintain comfortable temperatures.

Visual barriers or partitions offer privacy, 

increase bears’ sense of security, and 

minimize aggression.

Logs or structures

allow bears to 

scratch, rub, mark, or 

forage for insects. These are all 

natural, motivated behaviors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000880114
<NAME> BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,417
<PP&E>                                         447,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,284
<BONDS>                                        285,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,030
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,929)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   291,863
<SALES>                                         79,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,312
<CGS>                                           38,246
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,360
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,511
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 771 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 9, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 5325) making appropriations for the Legislative 

Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 

XXI are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order 

except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 
2 

•HRES 771 EH 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5325 pursuant to 

this resolution, section 3304 of Senate Concurrent Resolution 

11 shall not apply. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Center for Veterinary Biologics Operations Manual

CVB-MAN-5100 03

CVB-MAN-QM

30 Jan 2023

CVB-Released
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Weldon Boyce Bridges, Appellant

No. 06-12-00109-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 159th District Court of 

Angelina County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR27979). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Weldon Boyce Bridges, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 11, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerI, Paula J. Meiler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I, are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: May 12, 2006       /s/ Paula J. Meiler         Paula J. Meiler    Senior Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer  
22.
EXHIBIT 10.20

            SCHEDULE OF PARTIES RECEIVING INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS


Erline Belton
Gina Boswell
Doug Conant
Philip R. Crimmins Sr.
Nancy Culbertson
D. Patrick Curran
Michael Czinege
Carol DiRaimo
Beverly O. Elving
Tom Finocchiaro
David L. Goebel
Kurt Hankins
Eric L. Hansen
Jack P. Helms
Lloyd L. Hill
Steven K. Lumpkin
Larry Miller
David R. Parsley
Rogelio Rrbolledo
Sam Rothschild
Burton M. Sack
Rohan St. George
Carin L. Stutz
Stanley M. Sword
Rebecca R. Tilden
Michael Volkema
Douglas D. Waltman
Scott White
#### Estelle Rosell DeSPAIN and Wanda Irene McDonald, Appellants, v. The CITY OF TULSA, Appellee.

Nos. M-74-609, M-74-611.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 10, 1975.

Charles L. Woodstock, John D. Harris, Tulsa, for appellants.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

*1038OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge :

Appellants, Estelle Rosell DeSpain and Wanda Irene McDonald, hereinafter referred to as defendants, were charged, tried and convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Case numbers 11752 and 11262 (Estelle Rosell De-Spain) and 11261 (Wanda Irene McDonald), for the offenses of Securing or Offering to Secure another for the Purpose of Prostitution, Soliciting for an Act of Prostitution (Nos. 11752 and 11262) and Soliciting for an Act of Prostitution (No. 11261). Their punishments were fixed at ninety (90) days’ imprisonment in the City Jail (Nos. 11752 and 11262 concurrently) and forty-five (45) days in the City Jail (No. 11261). From said judgments and sentences, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

As this cause requires reversal for a new trial, we do not deem it necessary to recite the facts. We have diligently searched the record and find that the same does not contain the ordinance under which the defendants were tried and convicted. We are therefore of the opinion that the judgments and sentences appealed from must be, and the same hereby are, reversed and remanded. See, Goomda v. City of Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 991 (1973), where this Court held:

> “On a review of a municipal court judgment the Court of Criminal Appeals will not take judicial notice of an ordinance involved, . . . Such ordinance must be reflected in the record, ... or the wording must have been agreed to by the parties and stipulation entered in the record during trial.”

Also see Cooper v. Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 910 (1972), Johnson v. State, Okl.Cr., 504 P.2d 901 (1972) and Simmons v. Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 429 P.2d 530 (1967).

Judgments and sentences reversed and remanded.

BLISS, P. J., and BRETT, J., concurs.
# C_2018161EN.01006801.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/68

---

Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Mende Omalanga v Council

(Case T-176/18)

(2018/C 161/84)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lambert Mende Omalanga (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 12 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 12 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 12 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 12 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-163/18, Amisi Kumba v Council.

Amisi Kumba

Council

---
# C_2019082EN.01001502.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 20 December 2018 — AAS BALTA v UAB GRIFS AG

(Case C-803/18)

(2019/C 82/16)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: AAS BALTA

Other party to the proceedings in cassation: UAB GRIFS AG

Question referred

Must Articles 15(5) and 16(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters be construed as meaning that, in the case of large-risk insurance, an agreement conferring jurisdiction included in the insurance contract concluded between the policyholder and the insurer may be relied on against a person insured under that contract who has not expressly subscribed to that clause and who is habitually resident or established in a Member State other than that of the policyholder and the insurer?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).

---