alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

p1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141869

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141869 COA: 291363 Kalamazoo CC: 2008-000609-FH JEREMY DEAN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Herbert VIETH, Alvin Vieth, Elmer Vieth and Milton Vieth, a co-partnership doing business under the trade name of Vieth Brothers Machinery Company, Petitioners, v. Rena Amy COOK, Administratrix of the Estate of Kilman Cook, Deceased, and the State Industrial Commission of the State of Oklahoma, Respondents.

No. 37155.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 5, 1957.

Louis V. Woodruff, Kingfisher, J. I. Gibson, Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

O. A. Cargill, Sr., O. A. Cargill, Jr., John Chiaf, Oklahoma City, Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Kilman Cook, as claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation against Herbert Vieth, Alvin Vieth, Elmer Vieth and Milton Vieth, a co-partnership doing business under the trade name of Vieth Brothers Machinery Company, on July 21, 1953. On April 13, 1955, a single commissioner denied an award on the ground that the claimant was not an employee of the co-partnership. On the 9th day of November, 1955, the State Industrial Commission entered an order which is in part as follows:

> “It Is Therefore Ordered, That the order of the Trial Judge, heretofore entered in this case on April 13th, 1955, be and the same is hereby reversed and remanded to take further testimony on the question of extent of permanent partial disability and duration of temporary total disability, the Commission En Banc, finding that respondent is liable for temporary total and permanent disability in said cause.”

This proceeding was commenced by the above named members of the co-partnership to review said order. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the order is not subject to appeal. We agree. This court has many times held that an order which vacates an order of a single commissioner and leaves the proceeding for final disposition cannot be brought to this court under the provisions, of 85 O.S.1951 § 29, prior to such final disposition. Dixon Bros. Lumber & Supply Co. v. Watson, Okl., 281 P.2d 182; Armour & Co. v. Moore, 206 Okl. 72, 240 P.2d 1113; Anchor Stone & Materials Co. v. Terry, 207 Okl. 690, 252 P.2d 443. In Anchor *1111Stone and Materials Co. v. Terry, supra, it is stated:

> “An order of the State Industrial Commission vacating an order of the trial commissioner denying compensation to employee and holding the case in abeyance for further hearing at a later date is not a final order, and this court is without jurisdiction to review such order.”

Until there has been a final disposition of the case before the State Industrial Commission either making an award for claimant or finally denying an award no proceeding can be brought to this court.

Proceeding dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**

** **

 I, Leonard Osser, the Interim Chief Executive Officer of Milestone Scientific Inc., certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Milestone Scientific Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: April 2, 2020

 

/s/ Leonard Osser

Leonard Osser

Interim Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 24-01 

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

 Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

 Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Geetha B. Srinivas

 Director, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

SUBJECT: Request Input on Proposed Enhancement for Export Certification

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Notice is to request feedback from industry regarding a proposed 

customer improvement plan for export certification. The Center for Veterinary 

Biologics (CVB) is considering plans to provide an option for digital/electronic 

signed export certificates: APHIS Forms 2017, 2046, 2046S, 2047, and 2047S. This 

option will be in addition to current practices as outlined in VSM 800.52. 

II. BACKGROUND

The CVB may furnish export certificates for products prepared in accordance with 

the Virus Serum Toxin Act and regulations pursuant to the Act. Currently this 

service is provided by receiving certificates requested via USPS/Courier (hard copy) 

or the NCAH Portal. Certificates are issued hard-copy with a wet signature and may 

have additional authenticating factors such as embossed seals and stamps. 

III. PROPOSED PROCESS

A. The digital certificates will be issued using a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) 

format with an additional Adobe Approved Trust List (AATL). 

1. Only certificate requests submitted through the NCAH Portal will be 

considered for this option. 

2. Only one method of certificate issuance is allowed per submission. 

3. All formats listed in VSM 800.52 are eligible for a digital certificate.

IV. APPLICABILITY

We are requesting the input from licensed establishments that are enabled for use of 

the NCAH Portal to inform the CVB if this enhancement will benefit their export 

needs and if there would be any barriers with the use of this digital certificate 

enhancement. Please provide this feedback by June 30, 2024, by contacting 

CVB@usda.gov, attention to Ruben A. Osorio, and “Feedback Notice 24-01” in the 

subject line. 

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>   1

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,719,089
<SECURITIES>                                     6,691,208
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,525,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                        60,726
<INVENTORY>                                      2,082,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,399,391
<PP&E>                                           2,367,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,518,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,638,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,065,995
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            37,814
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,574,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,638,540
<SALES>                                         11,505,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,505,876
<CGS>                                            5,233,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,329,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,359,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,901,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (29,029)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,930,831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.64)
        


</TABLE>
Plant Protection and Quarantine

New York Residents:

Check Your Boxwoods for the Box Tree Moth!

The box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) is an invasive pest that can kill boxwoods if left unchecked. 

We need your help to keep it from spreading. Here’s what to look for:

Matteo Maspero and Andrea Tantardini, Centro 

MiRT - Fondazione Minoprio (IT)

Caterpillars and Webbing (young caterpillars hide among twigs/leaves, can grow to 1.5”)

Brown Leaves and Defoliation (look for missing sections of leaves or skeletonized leaves)

Healthy Adobe Stock Partially Infested Heavily Infested

Frass

(sawdust-like insect excrement)

Pupa

(may be wrapped in webbing)

Adult Moths

(hard to spot; most active at night))

Adobe Stock
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. APHIS-22-009 | Revised July 2022

Do Your Part To Stop the Box Tree Moth

1. Find and Report

If you live outside Niagara County and find any signs of infestation, take a

picture and report it online at https://arcg.is/1Df8Se or scan the QR code.

If you live inside Niagara County, you don’t need to report your findings. But keep

checking regularly for this pest to protect your boxwoods.

2. Cooperate With Agriculture Officials

Agriculture officials may ask for permission to access your

property so we can visually inspect your boxwood plants

or place box tree moth traps. Please cooperate with us!

This work is important to stop the spread.

3. Protect Your Boxwoods

Remove infested branches or, for heavy infestations, cut the

boxwood from its base (it should grow back from its roots).

Discard all boxwood debris by double-bagging it in plastic

and putting it with your household trash.

For more information, and a list of insecticides known to be effective against destructive

caterpillars, go to www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/box-tree-moth (click on “Resources”).

You can also contact your County Cooperative Extension office (cals.cornell.edu/cornellcooperative-extension/local-offices) for treatment options specific to your needs:

Niagara County: (716) 433-8839, niagara@cornell.edu

Erie County: (716) 652-5400, erie@cornell.edu

Orleans County: (585) 798-4265, orleans@cornell.edu

Genesee County: (585) 343-3040, genesee@cornell.edu

Questions?

Call the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) at 1-800-249-2363.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Naval Surface Technology & Innovation 
Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 11, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Naval Surface Technology & 
Innovation Consortium (``NSTIC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Specifically, Altus Technical Solutions LLC, Hanover, MD; Astro 
Machine Holdings dba Astro Machine Works, Ephrata, PA; Azure Summit 
Technology, Inc., Fairfax, VA; Breault Research Organization, Inc., 
Tucson, AZ; C3I, Exeter, NH; Core4ce LLC, Reston, VA; DRS Training & 
Control Systems LLC, Fort Walton Beach, FL; Elevan LLC dba Elevate 
Systems, San Antonia, TX; Flexible Concepts, Inc., Elkhart, IN; FN 
America LLC, Columbia, SC; Goldbelt Hawk LLC, Newport News, VA; Luna 
Labs USA LLC, Charlottesville, VA; MetalTek International, Inc., 
Waukesha, WI; Michael Fry Defense LLC, Dutton, VA; Mistral, Inc., 
Bethesda, MD; Oceanit Laboratories, Inc., Honolulu, HI; Optowares, 
Inc., Woburn, MA; OToole Tek LLC, Rocky Hill, CT; Purdue Applied 
Research Institute LLC, West Lafayette, IN; Smart Shooter, Inc., 
Herndon, VA; Titan Diversified Holdings, Inc., Charlotte, NC; and 
TMGcore, Inc., Plano, TX, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NSTIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 8, 2019, NSTIC filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
November 12, 2019 (84 FR 61071).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 7, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2023 (88 FR 66060).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27605 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,726
<PP&E>                                          14,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,673
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 241 (Monday, December 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27657]



[[Page 87457]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1189 (Second Review)]


Large Power Transformers From South Korea; Notice of Commission 
Determination To Conduct a Full Five-Year Review

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether 
revocation of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers 
from South Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence 
of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for 
the review will be established and announced at a later date.

DATES: December 5, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Gatten III (202-708-1447), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov.
    For further information concerning the conduct of this review and 
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 5, 2023, the Commission 
determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-
year review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that both the domestic and 
respondent interested party group responses from South Korea to its 
notice of institution (88 FR 60496, September 1, 2023) were adequate, 
and determined to conduct a full review of the order on imports from 
South Korea. A record of the Commissioners' votes will be available 
from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's website.
    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title 
VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 
Sec.  207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 12, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-27657 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                                NEXTHEALTH, INC.
                               SUBSIDIARY SCHEDULE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiaries                                         State of Incorporation          Doing Business As
------------                                         ----------------------          -----------------
<S>                                                  <C>                            <C>
Sierra Tucson, Inc.                                         Arizona

Sierra Tucson AC, Inc. (STAC)                               Arizona

Sierra Tucson Educational Materials, Inc.                   Arizona
(STEM)

Onsite Workshops, Inc. (inactive)                           Arizona

Sierra Healthstyles, Inc.                                   Arizona                         Miraval

NextHealth Water Resources, Inc.                            Arizona

Hilton Head Health Institute, Inc. (inactive)               Arizona

Soften, LLC                                                 Delaware                 Sierra Tucson
</TABLE>
#### Thomas J. CONNELLY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Norris RATHJEN and Clifford C. Dalbey, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 14035.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 19, 1976.

*1337David B. Havas and Gary L. Gale of Gale & Havas, Ogden, for plaintiff and appellant.

J. Anthony Eyre, Salt Lake City, for Rathjen.

Daniel A. Alsup, Ogden, for Dalbey.

ELLETT, Justice.

A complaint was filed against Rathjen and another seeking damages sustained by plaintiff in an automobile collision. Both defendants answered and Rathjen died before trial. Notice of his death was duly made of record pursuant to Rule 25(a), U. R.C.P.

In this case no motion for substitution was ever filed and the action against Rath-jen was dismissed on motion some seven months after his death was noted upon the record.

'The plaintiff appeals, claiming that Rule 25(a) is in conflict with the Probate Code which gives three months to the next of kin in which to -apply for letters of administration,1 before a nonrelated interested person may apply. Thus, where the named relatives2 fail to secure letters within the three months’ period, there is no pers'on who can be substituted for the deceased party during that period.

The laws are to the effect that a creditor is an interested person who may apply for letters of administration if the named relatives fail to do so within the three months’ time.3

There does at first blush seem to be difficulty where the death is noted upon the record the very day of the death of a party. However, in this case the notice was not filed until May 17, 1974, while the death of Mr. Rathjen occurred March 24, 1974. Thus the plaintiff, as an interested person, had 53 days to file for letters of administration after the time allowed the relatives to petition therefor had expired. Plaintiff made no request for the probate of the estate of the deceased and thus is in ■no position to complain of any conflict between the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure *1338and the statutory provisions of the Probate Code.

In addition to what is said above, Rule 6(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure provides that for good cause shown, the court may order an enlargement of time for any act which is by the rules required to be performed within a specified time. The plaintiff never asked the court for any enlargement of the 90 days in which to move for a substitution of parties and so he has no just basis for this appeal.

The order dismissing the case as to the deceased party was properly made and it is hereby affirmed.

There being no party substituted for the deceased, there is no one to receive costs and consequently no costs are awarded.

HENRIOD C. J., and CROCKETT, J, concur.

TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ.,. dissent.

1

. 75-4-8, U.C.A.1953.

2

. 75-4-1, U.C.A.1953.

3

. *In re Owens’ Estate,*30 Utah 351, 85 P. 277 (1907); *In re Cloward’s Estate,*95 Utah 453, 466, 82 P.2d 336 (1938); 33 C.J.S. Executors and Administrators § 31, p. 922.
May 19, 2004

23966

#### Ajifu v. State, Dept. of Accounting and General Services

Affirmed