alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*SAMUEL BARRETTO

(AC 18528)

Mihalakos, Zarella and Pellegrino, Js.

Argued May 9

officially released August 29, 2000

*655*Stephen F. Cashman,*special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

*Marjorie Allen Dauster,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *James E. Thomas,*state’s attorney, and *Michael Gailor,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Samuel Barretto, from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2),1 one count of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a (a) (1) (A)2 and three counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.3 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted the state’s motion to amend the information to change the time when the offenses occurred, *656thereby denying the defendant a fair trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

“The trial court may permit the state, after the start of the trial, to file an amended information to conform to the evidence.” *State*v. *Adams,*38 Conn. App. 643, 649, 662 A.2d 1327, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908, 665 A.2d 902 (1995). “The defendant must provide a specific showing of prejudice resulting from the state’s delay in providing notice of the charge against which [he] must defend.” *State*v. *Mazzetta,*21 Conn. App. 431, 438, 574 A.2d 806, cert. denied, 216 Conn. 807, 580 A.2d 64 (1990). “The order of the trial court allowing the filing of such an amendment to conform to the evidence is generally within its sound discretion . . . and thus subject to review only upon circumstances indicating an abuse of that discretion.” (Citations omitted.) *State*v. *Ramos,*176 Conn. 275, 276, 407 A.2d 952 (1978).

We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting the state’s motion to amend the information to change the time when the offenses occurred and that the defendant was not prejudiced by the court’s decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

 General Statutes § 53a-70 (a.) provides in relevant part: “A person is guilty of sexual assault in the first degree when such person . . . (2) engages in sexual intercourse with another person and such other person is under thirteen years oí age and the actor is more than two years older than such person . . . .”

2

 General Statutes § 53a-73a (a) provides in relevant part: “A person is guilty of sexual assault in the fourth degree when: (1) Such person intentionally subjects another person to sexual contact who is (A) under fifteen years of age . . .

3

**General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 53-21 provides in relevant part: “Any person who wilfully or unlawfully causes or permits any child under the age of sixteen years to be placed in such a situation that its life or limb is endangered ... or does any act likely to impair the health or morals of any such child, shall be fined not more 1han five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than ten years or both.”
√

Checklist for Equipment 

and Vehicles

Whether you’re part of a large commercial enterprise or keep birds as a hobby, 

you can help protect the Nation’s poultry by keeping your equipment and vehicles 

clean and germ-free. Make sure everyone who comes in contact with your flock 

knows and follows all of the procedures to avoid spreading germs and diseases. 

If you see or suspect anything unusual, call your flock supervisor, veterinarian, or 

cooperative extension office right away. Use this form to record phone numbers 

for contacts in your area. The earlier you act, the easier it is to contain the disease 

to a single flock.

Check the list on the back for tips 

to help keep your flocks healthy.

Report Sick Birds

If you see signs of illness, take action right away! Phone Number

Veterinarian

Cooperative Extension Office

State Veterinarian/Animal or Poultry Diagnostic Lab

USDA 866.536.7593

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
√

 • 

Checklist:Tips To Help Keep Your Flocks Healthy

This checklist is a general guide to practicing good biosecurity, but if you have a 

site-specific biosecurity plan, please follow it. Commercial growers should be sure their 

site-specific plans follow the National Poultry Improvement Plan biosecurity principles. 

Clean equipment and vehicles with soap 

and water before and after they come in 

contact with your flock. Be sure to spray the 

tires and undercarriage of vehicles, where 

contact with infectious agents is most likely. 

Germs can survive months—or even years—

in small spaces that are hard to clean.

Do not share tools, poultry supplies, 

or lawn and garden equipment with other 

flock owners or neighbors. If you must, be sure 

to clean and disinfect the items before they 

reach your property and before returning them. 

Establish procedures for cleaning and 

disinfecting equipment and vehicles.

Don’t be afraid to change these procedures 

if you see a problem or if something’s just 

not effective or practical. There’s always 

room for improvement. 

Give clear and consistent instructions to 

everyone who handles your equipment or vehicles. 

Define paths where trucks, vehicles, and other 

equipment can travel to access your poultry area. 

This will help limit the spread of germs and disease. 

Know the warning signs of poultry disease,

like changes in how much your birds eat or drink,

increased deaths in your flock, or general malaise.

For more information about how to keep your flocks healthy, follow Defend the Flock on 

Facebook and Twitter and visit www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/defendtheflock.

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 2235-2 Issued November 2018 USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
### Devany, Dennis (OST) From: Barb and Ken[kenbarbgarden@charter.net]

... Sent: .**~·Stlnday,** February 14, 2010 3:39 PM

. To: . ·Devany..Oennis (OST): Swanson, Bdan (OST) ··Subject: Supporting Cape Air Service in Plattsburgh 

### LI Go.Q9**Af.t~noqn.;.** ·fnope·thaftne final decision regarding airline service to Plattsburgh has not yet been made. I believe that ourCounty Legislature came to an incorrect decision recently, and that the correct choice for ourarea should be CAPE AIR. It is clearto manythat bigger .is not better in this case. The DOT should consider all the facts for themselves, and notaccept the recommendation of the county. Andrew Schonbek, former CEO of SchonbekWorldwide Lighting, has written very eloquently in support ofCape Air.,**Hi~** opinion piece appears in the Saturday, February 13th issue of the Press Republican and really makes an unmistakeably strong casefor retaining the companywith the proven track record of service, safety, andaffordability--CAPEAIR. . Thank you for your attention. Barbara Adams Plattsburgh, NY

1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. McKernan, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify in such capacity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods reflected
therein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2005



By:

/s/    JOHN R. MCKERNAN,
JR.John R. McKernan, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
6. All otherterms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and OrderNo. 8213A, as modified, shall remain in effect. 

# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8213A Modification No.3 ) ) ) ) )

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission ofFuture Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009. 5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8213A and/orits subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall comply with the requirements ofSections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations. I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to comply with the emissions limits ofSubsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby replaced with May I, 2010. 2. Any references to October 1st with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (VERCS) and/or allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009. 3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and retirement ofnon-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2010. Whereas, the CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Middletown Power LLC ('Respondent)having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8213A and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows: The State ofConnecticut and Middletown Power LLC In the matter of

( Printed on Recycled Polper) 79 Elm Street· Hartford, CT 06106-5127 http://www.CLgov/dep All Equal Opportullity Employer, 

## .. 

# . . ' ,.

Middletown PowerLLC 2 Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8213A Modification No.3
The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. Middletown Power LLC Signature: 

# f' D&> R...4;M Name: 

### \)"",:J 1.**'b-si4w~s**

Date: "1- II"

- 

### oS
Issued as a modification ofa Trading Agreement and Order.
Gari).os() Director Engineering and Enforcement Division Bureau ofAirManagement 

## 04-**.2..~-** 

# .:Lc-c'l Date
# C_2018072EN.01004701.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/47

---

Action brought on 8 January 2018 — Addiko Bank v EUIPO (STRAIGHTFORWARD BANKING)

(Case T-9/18)

(2018/C 072/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Addiko Bank AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: A. Seling, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘STRAIGHTFORWARD BANKING’ — Application for registration No 16 133 449

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2017 in Case R 1090/2017-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
Grasshopper/Mormon cricket

Visual Surveys

2024 Quick Reference

Program: Grasshopper/Mormon cricket (GHMC)

Application: ArcGIS Field Maps

Host: USDA-MRP GIS Enterprise (portal)

Map Title: PPQ GHMC Surveys 2024 Field Map

CHECK URL! https://maps.mrp.usda.gov/arcgis/

IMPORTANT!! You must synchronize your map at the beginning/end of each workday.*

1. Open ArcGIS Field Maps. Confirm the correct ArcGIS Enterprise URL.

2. Open previously downloaded map area.

3. Stand at the point you wish to collect.

4. From the menu bar at the top of the page, tap the Layers icon (Figure 1) 

to toggle ON the layers you wish to view/edit.

GHMC Visual Surveys 

1. Tap the blue plus sign in the lower-right corner of the map to add data. 

(Figure 2)

2. Select the pest/survey stage layer that you wish to edit from the menu on 

the left.

3. Complete the data form (Verify the Survey Date field is Today.)

4. Tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

If the Submit button fails, you have not completed all required fields or GPS accuracy failed.

To preserve battery power, put the device to sleep between surveys. 

*For more details, refer to the PPQ GHMC Visual Surveys User Manual.

ArcGIS Field Maps 

Mobile Application

Figure 2. Add 

data button

Figure 1.

Layers icon

Florida Division of Plant Industry, Florida 

Department of Agriculture and Consumer 

Services, Bugwood.org

Florida Division of Plant Industry, 

Florida Department of Agriculture and 

Consumer Services, Bugwood.org
20177

#### State v. Turk

Affirmed
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

December 27, 2012

The Honorable Robert M. Summers

Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Secretary Summers:

On November 19, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). This SIP revision (#12-07) to the SIP 

pertains to adoption under COMAR 26.11.04 through prospective incorporation by reference the 

national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) to ensure Maryland’s ambient air quality 

standards are identical to the federal standards at all times and pertains to repeal of existing 

provisions, namely, Regulations .02 and .04—.09 related to the NAAQS. EPA has determined 

that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Christopher 

Cripps, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2179. He is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration

Diane Franks, Manager, Air Quality Planning Program
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

H:\ CCRIPPS\MD NAAQS IBR as amended\ Completeness Letter MD NAAQS IBR 

MD248.docx

CONCURRENCES

SYMBOL  3AP30 3AP30 3AP00

SURNAME  Cripps Mastro Esher

DATE 

EPA Form 1320-1 (12-70) OFFICIAL FILE COPY
**Exhibit 23**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ANDCONSENT**

 

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Ibis Technology Corporation:

 

The audits referred to inour report dated January 30, 2004, included the related financial statementschedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2003, included in the annual report on Form 10-K.  The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of theCompany’s management.  Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedulebased on our audits.  In our opinion,such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basicfinancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respectsthe information set forth therein.

 

We consent to incorporationby reference in the registration statements (No.  333-78440) on Form S-3, (No. 333-09237) on Form S-3, (No.333-82497) on Form S-3, (No. 333-09239) on Form S-8, (No.  333-81452) on Form S-8, (No. 333-45247) onForm S-8, and (No. 333-36706) on Form S-8, and (No. 333-61184) on Form S-8 ofIbis Technology Corporation of our report dated January 30, 2004, relating tothe balance sheets of Ibis Technology Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K ofIbis Technology Corporation.

 

 
|                  | /s/  KPMG LLP |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  |                    |   |
| Boston, Massachusetts |                    |   |
| March 2, 2004    |                    |   |

 

1

----
#### State v. Manglicmot

22768

04/05/2001

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard D. Spurr,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Zix Corporation;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Intentionally omitted.*
|-- | -----------------------



|4. | Intentionally omitted.*
|-- | -----------------------



|5. | Intentionally omitted.*
|-- | -----------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Richard D. Spurr                 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Richard D. Spurr                     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|* | Included in Exhibit 31.1 to the 2014 Annual Report filed by Zix Corporation on March 11, 2015
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2018112EN.01004201.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/42

---

Action brought on 5 February 2018 — Endoceutics v EUIPO — Merck (FEMIVIA)

(Case T-59/18)

(2018/C 112/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Endoceutics, Inc. (Quebec, Quebec, Canada) (represented by: M. Wahlin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FEMIVIA’ — Application for registration No 13 148 986

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2017 in Case R 280/2017-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the Applicant’s costs both at EUIPO and at the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the Applicant’s costs both at EUIPO and at the General Court.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 815 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 815

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governments 
  should assure that all travelers departing for or returning from a 
destination where mosquito transmission of the Zika Virus is occurring 
   will be informed of symptoms of the Zika Virus, the measures that 
should be taken to protect against mosquito bites, and inform women who 
    are pregnant or may become pregnant to seek the advice of their 
                       physician prior to travel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2016

 Ms. Jackson Lee (for herself, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. 
 Peters, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Butterfield, Ms. 
   Brown of Florida, Ms. Plaskett, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. 
Norton, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Meeks, Mr. 
     Al Green of Texas, and Mr. Jeffries) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that governments 
  should assure that all travelers departing for or returning from a 
destination where mosquito transmission of the Zika Virus is occurring 
   will be informed of symptoms of the Zika Virus, the measures that 
should be taken to protect against mosquito bites, and inform women who 
    are pregnant or may become pregnant to seek the advice of their 
                       physician prior to travel.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
governments, including the Government of Brazil, should--
            (1) assure that travelers are informed regarding the 
        presence of mosquito transmission of the Zika Virus;
            (2) assure that athletes traveling to the 2016 Olympics in 
        Brazil are informed regarding the presence of the Zika Virus 
        and that Brazil has taken appropriate protective measures to 
        keep athletes free of the disease;
            (3) urge travelers to take the appropriate steps to reduce 
        the chances of contracting the illness; and
            (4) urge travelers returning from an area where mosquito 
        transmission is known to be actively occurring to take 
        precautions to protect others from possible exposure to the 
        illness and to seek medical advice should symptoms of the 
        disease occur.
                                 <all>
```