alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Fellowships in Kidney, 
Urology, and Hematology DDK-G Fellowships in Kidney, Urology, and 
Hematology.
    Date: February 14, 2024.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Xiaodu Guo, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7023, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-4719, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b1c0e14033b1e030f091a5515121f1f1055151213551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c4b5943546c4954585e4d02424548484702424544024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 7, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-27266 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
, J. 

challenged ruling would not be appealable. Accordingly, as we lack 

jurisdiction, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge 

Donald Richard Childs, II 

Boyack & Beck 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'In light of this order, appellant need not file the proper person 

appeal statement. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
ERIC E. BALCOM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1400

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 9, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Dawn Caloca-Johnson, Judge.

Eric E. Balcom, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the appellant’s petition seeking to file a belated motion 

for postconviction relief is reversed. The case is remanded for an evidentiary 

hearing to determine the validity of the appellant’s claim that counsel failed to file 

a timely postconviction motion, without prejudice to the state’s right to raise the 

defense of laches. See Strong v. State, 851 So. 2d 758, 758 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) 
(concluding that the burden was on the state to establish laches as a defense to an 

otherwise timely petition seeking to file a belated postconviction motion); Sanchez 

v. State, 848 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“If the State has a basis on 

which to dispute the defendant’s entitlement to a belated filing under [r]ule 

3.850(b)(3), then there must be a hearing on that issue.”). 

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27545]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

Fish and Wildlife Service

[BLM_FRN_MO4500175331]


Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement To Reconsider a Highway Right-of-Way Application and 
Associated Amendment of an Incidental Take Permit, Washington County, 
Utah; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Intent; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the scoping comment period of the Notice 
of Intent to Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to 
Reconsider a Highway Right-of-Way Application and Associated Amendment 
of an Incidental Take Permit, Washington County, Utah, published in the 
Federal Register on November 16, 2023. The initial notice had an 
incorrect end date of the scoping period of December 18, 2023. The 
correct end date of the scoping period is December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dawna Ferris-Rowley, NCA Manager, Red 
Cliffs and Beaver Dam Wash NCAs, telephone (435) 688-3200; address 345 
East Riverside Drive, St. George, UT 84790; email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8faf4f5e7edece7f6d7caccd0ddcad6fbd7cacad1dcd7caf8dad4d596dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f7d7372606a6b6071504d4b575a4d517c504d4d565b504d7f5d535211585049">[email protected]</span></a>. Contact Ms. Ferris-Rowley to have your 
name added to our mailing list. Individuals in the United States who 
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may 
dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay 
services for contacting Ms. Ferris-Rowley. Individuals outside the 
United States should use the relay services offered within their 
country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the 
United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 16, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-
25252, on page 78781, in the second column, correct the DATES caption 
to read:

DATES: This notice initiates the public scoping process for the SEIS. 
The BLM and FWS request the public submit comments concerning the scope 
of the analysis, potential alternatives, impacts of the proposed action 
and alternatives, and identification of relevant information and 
studies by December 21, 2023. To afford the BLM and FWS the opportunity 
to consider comments in the Draft SEIS, please ensure your comments are 
received prior to the close of the 30-day scoping period or 15 days 
after the last public meeting, whichever is later.

Gregory Sheehan,
Utah State Director.
Anna Munoz,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2023-27545 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-25-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2018352EN.01004401.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/44

---

Action brought on 15 August 2018 — Zhadanov v EUIPO (Scanner Pro)

(Case T-492/18)

(2018/C 352/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Igor Zhadanov (Odessa, Ukraine) (represented by: P. Olson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Scanner Pro — Application for registration No 16 257 727

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2018 in Case R 1812/2017-2.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | register European Union Trade Mark Application 016257727 for goods in classes 9 and 42; |
| --- | --- |

—

register European Union Trade Mark Application 016257727 for goods in classes 9 and 42;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

        CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44620) pertaining to
the Sierra Tucson Companies, Inc., 1992 Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-38608)
pertaining to the Sierra Tucson Companies, Inc., 1990 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated January 29, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of the Company included in the  Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP               
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Tucson, Arizona
March 23, 1998
# C_2018408EN.01006201.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/62

---

Action brought on 25 September 2018 — Hickies v EUIPO (Shape of a shoe lace)

(Case T-573/18)

(2018/C 408/80)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hickies, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: I. Fowler, Solicitor and J. Schmitt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union three-dimensional mark (Shape of a shoe lace) — Application for registration No 16 952 962

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2018 in Case R 2693/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision insofar as it dismissed the applicant’s appeal in relation to ‘shoe laces; shoe ornaments made of plastic; shoe trimmings; accessories for apparel, sewing articles and decorative textile articles; shoe buckles; shoe fasteners’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision insofar as it dismissed the applicant’s appeal in relation to ‘shoe laces; shoe ornaments made of plastic; shoe trimmings; accessories for apparel, sewing articles and decorative textile articles; shoe buckles; shoe fasteners’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and in their related prospectuses of Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc., as listed below,
of our report dated February 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.



|                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|RegistrationStatement No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|                          | 
|333-24871                 |  | Form S-8, pertaining to the Companys 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, Special Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and Non-Employee Directors Fees
Plan                                                                 
|                          | 
|333-24875                 |  | Form S-8, pertaining to the Companys 1992 Incentive Plan                                                                                                                                                                                  
|                          | 
|333-34441                 |  | Form S-3, Shelf Registration Statement, pertaining to the registration of $200 million of Common Shares, Preferred Shares and Debt Securities                                                                                              
|                          | 
|333-65576                 |  | Form S-3, pertaining to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan                                                                                                                                                        
|                          | 
|333-89227                 |  | Form S-8, pertaining to the issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares in connection with the 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and its 1996 Incentive Plan of an acquired
entity (Apple Residential Income Trust, Inc.)
|                          | 
|333-100198                |  | Form S-3, pertaining to the registration of common shares to be issued in redemption of partnership units of Cornerstone NC Operating Limited Partnership                                                                                  



/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia

March 11, 2004
January 23, 1997

19977

#### State v. Hoopii

Affirmed
# C_2019423EN.01005402.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/54

---

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2019 — Nissin Foods Holdings v EUIPO — The GB Foods (Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES)

(Case T-663/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES - Absolute ground for invalidity - Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 423/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd (Osaka, Japan) (represented by S. Malynicz QC, G. Messenger, Barrister, K. Gilbert and G. Lodge, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: The GB Foods, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by E. Torner Lasalle, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2018 (Case R 111/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between The GB Foods and Nissin Foods Holdings.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

| 3. | The GB Foods, SA shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The GB Foods, SA shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
BRAZIL

MA

Cordoba

an |
¢ San
p Luis
f Mendoza
La Pampa

URUGUAY ~

Capital &
Federal

(Buenos Aires|

The region of Argentina that consists of Patagonia North "B" and Patagonia South
JAMIE DANIELLE MINOR

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4033

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed February 19, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant; Ja mie Danielle Minor, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### State v. Gomes

16714

7/17/97

Affirmed
#### Franklin C. REAVES, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.C. PAGE; Jack Davis; Bill Bullard; Benjamin Willis; Lake E. Summers; Vinton D. Lide Associate LLC; City of Mullins Police Department; Marion County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-1181.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 16, 2005.

Decided Oct. 17, 2005.

Franklin C. Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, Vinton D. Lide & Associates, Lexington, South Carolina; Lake Eric Summers, Malone and Thompson, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

*825Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit, See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Reaves seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s judgment was entered on the docket on November 8, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on January 31, 2005. Because Reaves failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# C_2020061EN.01002402.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Probelte v Commission

(Case T-67/18) (1)

(Plant protection products - Active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline - Request for amendment of the conditions of approval - Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling - Right to be heard - Legitimate expectations - Manifest error of assessment)

(2020/C 61/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Probelte, SA (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: C. Mereu and S. Saez Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, G. Koleva and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2065 of 13 November 2017 confirming the conditions of approval of the active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline, as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and modifying Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 as regards the inclusion of the active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline in the list of candidates for substitution (OJ 2017 L 295, p. 40).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Probelte, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Probelte, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
#### George ALVAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee v. The CITY OF BROWNSVILLE, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40772

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 2, 2017

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ■ ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a,briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
# C_2019072EN.01003801.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/38

---

Action brought on 24 December 2018 — Tecnodidattica SpA v EUIPO (Base for lamps)

(Case T-752/18)

(2019/C 72/48)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tecnodidattica SpA (San Colombano Certenoli, Italy) (represented by: S. Corona and F. Corona, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark (Shape of a base for lamps) — Application for registration No 14 997 308

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 October 2018 in Case R 76/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(a)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(a)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 191 

Expressing support for the designation of April 10, 2015, as ‘‘Venture Smith’s 

Freedom Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself and Mr. COURTNEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 10, 2015, 

as ‘‘Venture Smith’s Freedom Day’’. 

Whereas 250 years ago, in the year 1765, Venture Smith, at 

the age of 36, purchased his freedom; 

Whereas Venture Smith went on to free his family from the 

bondage of slavery; 

Whereas Venture Smith went on to become a successful businessman in the State of Connecticut; and 

Whereas, April 10, 2015, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as ‘‘Venture Smith’s Freedom Day’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Venture Smith’s Freedom Day’’, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 191 IH 

1 which would recognize the 250th anniversary of Venture 

2 Smith purchasing his freedom and going on to become a 

3 successful businessman in Connecticut. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS