alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Hofmann,  Chief Financial Officer of Itec Environmental Group Inc.
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Itec Environmental
Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ Michael E. Hofmann
----------------------
Michael E. Hofmann
Date: February 9, 2004
# C_2018445EN.01002302.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/23

---

Action brought on 18 October 2018 — mobile.de v EUIPO (Representation of a car in a speech bubble)

(Case T-629/18)

(2018/C 445/29)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: mobile.de GmbH (Dreilinden, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark (Representation of a car in a speech bubble) — Application No 15 598 931

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 August 2018 in Case R 2653/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 49(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 49(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the second sentence of Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the second sentence of Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the fourth sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 23(1)(d) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the fourth sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 23(1)(d) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of the fourth sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 23(1)(e) and Article 22(1)(b) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the fourth sentence of Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 23(1)(e) and Article 22(1)(b) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---
# C_2019082EN.01005502.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Multifit v EUIPO (fit+fun)

(Case T-94/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark fit+fun - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 82/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, D. Walicka, M. Eberl and A. Sesma Merino, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2017 (Case R 847/2017-1) concerning the registration of the word mark fit+fun as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration
statements (No.  33-80690 and 33-82552) on Form S-8 and the registration on Form
S-3 that is  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 4 to the registration  statement (No.
33-31234)  on Form S-1 of Jordan  American  Holdings,  Inc. of our report  dated
March 1,  2002  relating  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Jordan
American  Holdings,  Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December
31, 2001, which is part of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                        /s/ SPICER, JEFFRIES & CO.

Denver, Colorado
April 12, 2002
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Ibis Technology Corporation (the *“Company”*) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the *“Report”*), I, William J Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

Dated: May 22, 2008

 

 
| /s/  ***William J. Schmidt*** |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| William  J. Schmidt           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
#### State v. Torres

18906

4/30/97

Vacated and Remanded
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thethree-month period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Paula J. Meiler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Paula J. Meiler     Paula J. Meiler  Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer   * This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except asotherwise stated in such filing.
24.
Page 1 of 1 

John Romans 

From: John Romans Oohnromanslaw@optonline.netJ 

Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 7:09 PM 

To: 'Dayton.Lehman@ost.dot.gov'; 'carl.nelson@aa.com'; 'cefelts@fedex.com'; 'PauI.Gretch@ost.dot.gov'; 

'dfisher@kellydrye.com'; 'ejm@mrecic.gov.ar'; 'EvansF@state.gov'; 'Manley, Jeffrey [DCAGV],; 

'Esta.Rosenberg@dot.gov'; 'George.Wellington@ost.dot.gov'; 'Brian.Hedberg@dot.gov' 

Cc: 'mbarrantes@aerolineas.com.ar'; 'jandreot@aerolineas.com.ar'; 'gcoto@aerolineas.com.ar' 

Subject: RE: RE: Aerolineas Argentinas Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion of the Joint 

Complainants From March 11 to April 5, 2011. 

On March 2, 2011, Joint Complainants made a Motion for an Order Requiring Disrtibution of the Funds 

from the Aerolineas Argentians Escrow Account. This is a Motion to extend the date for Aerolineas to 

respond from, March 11, 2011 to April 5, 2011. Before making this 

Motion, I conferred with a member of the Joint Complaninants who kindly contacted all of the other 

Complainants and informed me that they were not opposed to the request. Therefore, Aerolineas 

requests that the deadline of March 11 be extended to April 5, 2011 

John N.Romans 

100 Mamaroneck Avenue, 3d FI 

Mamaroneck, N.Y. 10543 

914-315-1896 

FAX 914-698-6984 

JOHNROMANSLAW@OPTONLlNE.NET 

3/7/2011 
Regulations.gov Page 1 of 1 

Print this page 

Submit a Comment 

Success! Your Comment Has Been Submitted 

Comment Tracking Number: 80c03333 

Thank you for submitting a comment on the following Other 

Document ID: DOT-OST-2D03-1S09Z-0426: Aerolineas Argentinas, S.A. 

When will my comment appear online? 

Your comment has been sent to the appropriate agency and will be available on Regulations.gov once it has been processed. Given 

certain regulations may have thousands of comments, processing may take several weeks before it can be viewed online. We value 

your comment, and encourage you to contact the agency directly for additional questions related to your specific comment. 

How do I find my comment in the future? 

The best way to find your comment in the future is to enter your Comment Tracking Number in the search field on the homepage. 

You can also search by keyword or submitter name. 

What can I do if my file was not successfully uploaded? 

If your file was not successfuUy uploaded, contact the Help Desk. 

http://www.regulations.gov/ 3/812011
Exhibit (23)

                        PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.
                            430 EAST 400 SOUTH
                        SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
                               (801) 328-1123






                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors
fonix corporation
Salt Lake City, Utah


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of fonix
corporation and subsidiary [a development stage company] as of December 31,
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995, and for
the period from October 1, 1993 (date of inception) to December 31, 1995.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of fonix corporation
and subsidiary (a development stage company) as of December 31, 1995, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1995 and for the period from October 1, 1993 (date of inception) to December 31,
1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern.   As discussed in Note 10
to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is still in the
development stage and has suffered recurring losses which raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 10.  The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/  PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.


March 4, 1996, except as to Note 12
 as to which the date is March 28, 1997
1st Annual NSTP Symposium

The APHIS NBAF Scientist Training program (NSTP) is a graduate training program designed to develop the next 

generation of scientists to support FADDL’s current and expanded mission objectives at NBAF. The 1st Annual NSTP 

Symposium was held June 18-20 in Manhattan, KS. In addition to the 10 current fellows from 6 universities (Kansas 

State, Iowa State, Mississippi State, Auburn, University of Georgia and North Carolina State), participants included their 

university mentors, FADDL scientists, NVSL leadership and D&B leadership. Presentations included project updates from 

the NSTP fellows, overview of NVSL by Drs. Randall Levings, Sabrina Swenson, Suelee Robbe-Austerman and Christina 

Loiacano. 

Local FBI special agent Cody Patterson provided guidance to address security issues relating to work at NBAF, and Dr. 

Kim Kirkham (AVIC, Kansas and Nebraska) and her team led a panel discussion regarding the relationship between 

FADDL and the field. One of the highlights for the fellows was the opportunity to review case studies of FMD and SVA 

with Dr. Greg Mayr. 

On the final day, Carol Roller (executive consultant, CTOD), led team building exercises with the fellows and NSTP 

Leadership (Alexa Bracht, Jamie Barnabei and Kim Dodd). The symposium concluded with a tour of the NBAF for the 

fellows!

The NSTP will continue to be an annual event, and will grow in size as additional fellowships are accepted into the 

program. The program is expected support a total of 24 students over the next few years.
1 Ogulei, David

From: U.S. EPA <usaepa@service.govdelivery.com> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:44 AM To: Ogulei, David Subject: News Release: EPA seeks comments on draft permit re newal for Veolia hazardous waste incinerator

Media Contact: Phillippa Cannon, 312-353-6218, cannon.phillippa@epa.gov

For Immediate Release No. 14-OPA112

EPA seeks comments on draft permit renewal for Veol ia hazardous waste incinerator

Chicago (Oct. 17, 2014) - The U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency is requesting public comment on the Agency’s proposal to renew the operating permit for Veolia ES Technical Solutions’ hazardous waste incinerator in Sauget, Illinois.

EPA initially issued a Clean Air Act permit for thi s facility on Sept. 12, 2008. Most requirements in the current permit would remain in place under the term s of the draft permit renewal. EPA is, however, proposing new “feedrate limits” for arsenic, lead m ercury and other metals. Other proposed changes ar e:

• Additional waste analysis procedures to ensure co mpliance with metal feedrate limits. • Temporary installation and operation of a monitor ing system on each incinerator to ensure that feedr ate limits are adequate to assure compliance with appli cable emissions limits. • New requirements for emergency generators.

The draft permit is available for review at: • Central Library, 1301 Olive St., St. Louis, Misso uri. • East St. Louis Library, 5300 State St., East St. Louis, Illinois. • Cahokia Public Library, 140 Cahokia Park Drive, E ast St. Louis, Illinois.

EPA has scheduled a public hearing on the draft per mit renewal from 3 to 7 p.m. on Wednesday, Dec. 3 a t SIU-Edwardsville, East St. Louis Higher Education C ampus, Room 2002 Building D, 601 James R. Thompson Blvd.

All written comments must be postmarked or emailed by Friday, Dec. 19. There are several ways to subm it written comments:

• Submit comments online at www.regulations.gov . Put Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280 in the search box.2 • Mail comments to George Czerniak, U.S. EPA Region 5 (A-18J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604. • Email comments to John Mooney at mooney.john@epa.gov

.

More information about the draft permit renewal is available at http://www.epa.gov/region5/air/veoliasauget/index.h tml

.

You can unsubscribe or update your subscriptions or e-mail address at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page . All you will need is your e- mail address. If you have any questions or problems

, please e-mail subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com for assistance.

This service is provided to you at no charge by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

.

This email was sent to ogulei.david@epa.gov using G ovDelivery, on behalf of: U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency  1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW  Washington DC 20460  202- 564-4355
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Pet Travel - How do I find a USDA

Accredited Veterinarian to complete

my animal's health certificate?

Last Modified: 

Print

For the purposes of international travel, most foreign countries require that the

health certificate be issued (completed, signed, dated) by a USDA Accredited
Veterinarian, before being endorsed (countersigned and embossed/stamped) by

APHIS.

What is a USDA Accredited Veterinarian?

A USDA Accredited Veterinarian has completed formal training from the National

Veterinary Accreditation Program (NVAP) in the state(s) they are licensed to practice

medicine in. Accreditation is state-specific and is voluntary (not all veterinarians are

accredited).

How do I Find a USDA Accredited Veterinarian?

Call and ask your local veterinarian if they or another veterinarian in

their practice is accredited, or if they know of someone who is.

Contact other local veterinary practices to ask them if they have an accredited

veterinarian on staff.

Use the NVAP self-search tool for finding accredited veterinarians in your area. 

Note: Not all accredited veterinarians in your area may appear in the

search since not all accredited veterinarians allow USDA APHIS to release

their information publicly.

IMPORTANT

Make sure your USDA Accredited Veterinarian is accredited in the state you are

seeing them in! USDA APHIS cannot endorse your health certificate if your

veterinarian is not accredited in the state they’re practicing medicine. Contact your

state’s NVAP Coordinator to confirm your veterinarian’s accreditation status.

NVAP Coordinator

Contact your state’s NVAP Coordinator to confirm your veterinarian’s accreditation

status.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...
Pet Travel - How do I find a USDA Accredited Veterinarian to complete my animal's

health certificate? Contacts

Pet Bird Owners

If you are traveling with or shipping a pet bird, make sure that your veterinarian has

the appropriate accreditation status (Category II) for completion of international

health certificates for birds.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Mexican Gray Wolves in the

Southwest

Last Modified: 

Print

A small population of reintroduced Mexican wolves, estimated in 2009 to be 42

animals, exists in parts of Arizona and New Mexico.

Learn more about Mexican wolves and wolf management in the Southwest.

In Arizona and New Mexico

Since Mexican gray wolves were first released in 1998, WS personnel have worked

closely with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, AZ Game and Fish Department, NM

Department of Game and Fish, White Mountain Apache Tribe and others to resolve

livestock predation and human safety concerns through an integrated management

approach.

WS is a member of the Adaptive Management Oversight Committee and the Mexican

Wolf Interagency Field Team. WS program personnel trap, relocate, attach radio

collars to wolves, and conduct other management actions as necessary.

Related Links

lView Lines of Defense - Coping with Predators in the Rocky Mountain Region

How WS Works with Livestock Producers
Livestock Protection Dogs on Public Lands: Protecting Sheep From Predators

(Brochure)

Livestock Protection Dogs on Public Lands: Protecting Sheep From Predators

(Sign)