alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Policy, Evaluation and Licensing

Director

Supervisory Veterinary Medical Officer

David White

Program Support Assistant

Patricia Marcov 

Vacant

STATISTICS

Section Leader

Supvy Mathcl Statcn

Amy Lock

BACTERIOLOGY

Section Leader

Supvy VMO

Melisse Schilling

Risk Manager

Matthew Sylte

VIROLOGY 

Section Leader 

Supvy VMO

Vacant

Legal Instruments Examiner

Timothy Koester

Kayla Straight

Senior Staff VMO

Amy Gill

Bruce Thomsen

Angela Walker

Vacant 

Vacant

Vacant

Senior Staff VMO

Amy Gill

Bruce Thomsen

Angela Walker

Vacant 

Vacant

Vacant

Program Assistant

Darriel Simons

Supvy Microbiologist

Alethea Fry

VMO

Derek Adams

Jaime Rutter

Vacant

Vacant

Microbiologist

Sandra Conrad

Alexandra Scupham

Vacant

Vacant

Bio Sci Lab Tech

Anna Dash

Emily Halverson

Nicholas Holland

June Meichsner

Anastasia Meyerhofer

Mark Troendle

Nickalaus Wunschel

Vacant

Vacant

Vacant

Vacant

Vacant

Bio Sci Lab Tech

Anna Dash

Emily Halverson

Nicholas Holland

June Meichsner

Anastasia Meyerhofer

Mark Troendle

Nickalaus Wunschel

Vacant

Vacant

Vacant

Vacant

Vacant

Senior Staff Statistician

Mathcl Statcn

Monica Reising

Christopher Tong 

Nehemias Ulloa

Staff Statistician

Mathcl Statcn

Valerie Burger

Thomas Kent

MariElyn Reisdorf

Joseph Swintek

Vacant

Staff Statistician

Mathcl Statcn

Valerie Burger

Thomas Kent

MariElyn Reisdorf

Joseph Swintek

Vacant

Center for Veterinary Biologics

Policy, Evaluation, and Licensing

Sr Staff Microbiologist

Connie Schmellik-Sandage

Vacant

Senior Staff Microbiologist

Microbiologist

Vacant

Senior Staff VMO

Mandy Larson

Jeffrey Nelson

Barbara Sheppard

Albert Van Geelen

Legal Instruments Examiner

Aimee Losee

Brenda Thede Staff VMO/Micro

Christopher Gourley

Morgan Hennessey

Garrett Smith

Kerry Sondgeroth

Vacant

Vacant

Staff VMO/Micro

Christopher Gourley

Morgan Hennessey

Garrett Smith

Kerry Sondgeroth

Vacant

Vacant

Program Assistant

Vacant

Vacant

VMO/Micro

Jacob DeVries

Katherine Turnbull

Vacant

Supervisory VMO/Micro

Randy Atchison

Microbiologist

Sophia Campbell

Heather Hutchings

Jason Marquardt

Janet Wilson

Bio Sci Lab Tech

Whitney Briggs

Julie Foglesong

Erin Krei

Jacob Lieb

Jessica Lindsey

Renee Olsen

Vacant

Vacant

Bio Sci Lab Tech

Whitney Briggs

Julie Foglesong

Erin Krei

Jacob Lieb

Jessica Lindsey

Renee Olsen

Vacant

Vacant

Student Trainee 

(Bio Sci Lab Tech) - SIP

Vacant

Student Trainee 

(Bio Sci Lab Tech) - SIP

Vacant

02/16/2024

DB-9

VMO/Micro

Crystal Reid

Vacant

Student Trainee

(Animal Health Tech)

Vacant

Data Scientist 

Brian Woerth

VMO/Biological Scientist

Lindsay Moss-Taylor

Roger Tseng

Vacant

Biological Scientist

Soyoun Hwang

Chowda Reddy

Staff VMO/Micro

Stephanie Crockett

Lora Gurley
January 26, 2000

22387

#### State v. Thongsonlone

Affirmed
Date:

To: 

 [insert name of State Plant Health Director or State Plant Regulatory Official]

Recently certified 

to on Export Certificate #__________________ (attached). 

This export certificate has /has not been reported as rejected by the importing country. The error(s) is/are 

check below:

Failure to follow PPQ policy with regard to export certificates

Certifying disease freedom in grain

Failure to follow inspectional guidelines

Failure to follow known import requirements

Certifying prohibited or ineligible commodities

Certifying CITES commodities at an ineligible port

Certifying commodities from non-accredited or non-compliant sources

Attesting to conditions from non-accredited or non-compliant sources

 

Our records indicate that this is the ACO's _______ warning this year. Future errors could result in suspending the 

ACO's accreditation (authority to issue export certificates). Please forward to my office a letter explaining the error(s) 

and what corrective actions will be taken. This notice is intended as a corrective action to ensure the integrity of 

USDA-APHIS-PPQ’s export program.

If you have any questions, contact me at 

 

 

 , Export Certification Specialist

(Signature of Export Certification Specialist)

(Printed name of Export Certification Specialist)

Enclosure

(insert your phone number)

[insert name ofAuthorized Certification Official (ACO)] [name of commodity] 

[name of country]
[753 NYS2d 289]

#### Valley Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation P.C., as Assignee of Lewis Lattari, Appellant, v New York Central Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 10, 2002

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Friedman & Harfenist,*Lake Success *(Steven J. Harfenist*and *Neil Torczyner*of counsel), for appellant. *Short & Billy, P.C.,*New York City *(Skip Short*and *Patrice Sorbono*of counsel), for respondent.

*676OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

In this action to recover first-party no-fault benefits, defendant’s verified answer alleged six affirmative defenses asserting various improprieties in the manner plaintiff was conducting its business, including that the corporation, formed by a Dr. Lahiri, did not provide medical services, and that fraud was being committed both as to the services rendered and in its billings. Many of these defenses (with a complete factual background) were raised against plaintiff herein and Dr. Lahiri, as defendants in the case of *State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Mallela*(175 F Supp 2d 401). Cases in New York have held that proper licensing of a medical provider is a condition precedent to payment *(see GEICO v Southern Med. Devices,*Sup Ct, NY County, Nov. 5, 1993, Ciparick, J., Index No. 118101/93; *North Bronx Med. v State Farm,*Sup Ct, NY County, May 8, 2001, Lebedeff, J., Index No. 105274/01; *Advanced Care of N.Y. v Friscia,*Sup Ct, Kings County, Feb. 22, 2000, Hall, J., Index No. 32528/99). In light of the Insurance Law’s requirement that insurers enact fraud prevention plans (Insurance Law § 409), and the New York State Department of Insurance’s opinion letters urging insurers to be more vigilant about potential fraud, discovery requests pertaining to plaintiff’s license status and corporate structure, which are related to allegations of fraudulent billing, are proper discovery subjects *(see Valley Physical Med. v Progressive Ins. Co.,*Sup Ct, Nassau County, Nov. 2, 2001, Franco, J., Index No. 16993/99).

Floyd, P.J., Doyle and Winick, JJ., concur.
September 16, 1999

21478

#### Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Duffy

Affirmed
# C_2018094EN.01003001.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/30

---

Action brought on 15 January 2018 — Crédit mutuel Arkéa v EUIPO — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Crédit Mutuel)

(Case T-13/18)

(2018/C 094/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Crédit mutuel Arkéa (Le Relecq Kerhuon, France) (represented by: A. Casalonga, F. Codevelle and C. Bercial Arias, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Crédit Mutuel’ — European Union trade mark No 9 943 135

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2017 in Case R 1724/2016-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it concedes that the European Union trade mark No 9 943 135 ‘Crédit Mutuel’ has a distinctive character through use for certain goods in Classes 9, 35 and 36; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it concedes that the European Union trade mark No 9 943 135 ‘Crédit Mutuel’ has a distinctive character through use for certain goods in Classes 9, 35 and 36;

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it recognises the distinctive character of the European Union trade mark No 9 943 135 ‘Crédit Mutuel’ for certain goods in Classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42 and 45; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it recognises the distinctive character of the European Union trade mark No 9 943 135 ‘Crédit Mutuel’ for certain goods in Classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42 and 45;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(a), read in combination with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3), of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(a), read in combination with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3), of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0000854858
<NAME>                           Ajay Sports, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                       US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         234
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,359
<PP&E>                                       2,749
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,159
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,962
<PREFERRED>                                  1,250
<COMMON>                                       233
<OTHER-SE>                                    (774)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,614
<SALES>                                     30,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,330
<CGS>                                       26,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (144)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,280)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.17)




</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51172

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JON PHILLIP RAMOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:05-CR-28-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Jon Phillip Ramos on appeal

from the revocation of his term of supervised release has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as is required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramos has not

responded to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
No. 05-51172

-2-

from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 927 

Expressing support for the designation of the third Wednesday of November 

as ‘‘Utility Scam Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2016 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the third 

Wednesday of November as ‘‘Utility Scam Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas reliable electricity, natural gas, and water service is 

important to the health, safety, and well-being of all 

Americans; 

Whereas such utilities play a valuable role in supporting the 

economy and security of the United States; 

Whereas customers of such utilities continue to be victimized 

by scammers impersonating utility company officials; 

Whereas many scammers falsely threaten to disconnect utility 

services if same-day payment is not received; 

Whereas scammer tactics have become more sophisticated 

over the years, including leveraging spoofing technology 

to display a utility company’s name on a customer’s callVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:52 Nov 16, 2016 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR927.IH HR927

lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 927 IH 

er ID and using a recording of a company’s upfront telephone menu message; 

Whereas the utility industry is raising awareness of scammer 

tactics and working with local, State, and Federal law enforcement agencies to identify, and prosecute, the criminals perpetrating the scam; 

Whereas a national day to create awareness of scammers impersonating utility industry companies will help protect 

customers; and 

Whereas the third Wednesday of November would be an appropriate date to designate as ‘‘Utility Scam Awareness 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Utility Scam 

3 Awareness Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe ‘‘Utility Scam Awareness Day’’; and 

6 (3) encourages utilities to use this day to raise 

7 awareness and knowledge amongst themselves and 

8 the general public regarding the threat posed by 

9 scams against utility customers, and the techniques 

10 and tools used to identify and avoid them. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
30 Utah 2d 328

#### Edwina ARENDS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David R. ARENDS, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 13349.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Jan. 2, 1974.

Galen J. Ross, Salt Lake City, for defendant-appellant.

Del B. Rowe, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-respondent.

ELLETT, Justice:

The parties hereto were divorced on April 13, 1972, and the defendant was given the temporary custody of the minor child born during the marriage. At that time the plaintiff was not physically well and also had some emotional disturbance.

Mrs. Arends made several efforts to have the court award the care, custody, and control of the child to her permanently, the last effort resulting in such an order being made. Mr. Arends appeals from *1020that order and claims that Section 30-3-10, U.C.A.1953, as amended (1973 Pocket Supplement), violates the equal protection clause of the State and Federal Constitutions. The wording of the statute which he claims violates his rights reads :

> In determining custody, the court shall consider the best interests of the child . . . and the natural presumption that the mother is best suited to care for young children .

The contention might have some merit to it in a proper case if the father was equally gifted in lactation as is the mother. However, the section does not even apply to divorce cases. It applies to cases of separation and when the marriage is declared void or dissolved.1

The statute2 which applies to divorce cases reads:

> When a decree of divorce is made, the court may make such orders in relation to the children, property and parties, and the maintenance of the parties and children, as may be equitable; . . .

In divorce cases the welfare of the minor children is of paramount importance in determining custody. This court in the case of Sampsell v. Holt3 said:

> Child custody proceedings are equitable in the highest degree, and this court has consistently held that the best interest and welfare of the minor child is the controlling factor in every case.

> 

At the hearing from which this appeal was taken, the trial court heard evidence, and based thereon he determined that the mother was a fit and proper person to have the care, custody, and control of the minor child and that the welfare of the child would best be served in placing it with the mother.

We are unable to say that the judge abused his discretion in that regard, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. Costs are awarded to the respondent.

CALLISTER, C. J., and CROCKETT, HENRIOD and TUCKETT, JJ., concur.

1

. Johnson v. Johnson, 7 Utah 2d 263, 323 P.2d 16 (1958) ; Sampsell v. Holt, 115 Utah 73, 202 P.2d 550 (1949).

2

. Sec. 30-3-5, U.O.A.1953, as amended (1973 Pocket Supplement).

3

. 115 Utah 73, 80, 202 P.2d 550 (1959).
Last Updated: 16 April 2021 10:03  1  

IPHIS: Surveys Defined  **Users should consult survey protocol and management direction for proper data entry using the survey types and associated fields below. 

SAMPLING Field Description for use Collect Sample Trap/Host found; take sample Inaccessible Access to trap restricted by temporary environmental situation; 

difficult to access  

TRAPPING Field Description for use Install Install a new trap Monitor View installed trap for presence of pests Recover Retrieve incorrectly placed/fallen trap 

 Release Used under biocontrol programs to indicate a biocontrol delivery Relocate (Install) As part of relocating, this field indicates installation at the new site. Relocate (Remove) As part of relocating, this field indicates removal from the initial site. Remove Withdraw a trap for any reason Remove (Missing) Withdraw non-present trap Replace Lure Replenish lure Replace Lure (Missing) Replenish absent lure Replace Trap Exchange damaged, full, or worn-out trap Replace Trap (Missing) Install an absent trap Replace Trap and Lure Exchange damaged, full, or worn-out trap and lure 

VISUAL Field Description for use Inspect View trap or area for trap placement or presence of pests Count Determine number of pests/hosts found Scout View area for potential trap placement Site Visit Stop at a residence, place of business or area to meet with a 

person to discuss pest issues   2021 Disclaimer: Training techniques or workflows held within are designed as basic job aids.  Mobile collection tools and technology used are constantly being improved upon.  End users should consult with management for current workflows and standards. 

- SAMPLING​
- TRAPPING​
- VISUAL​
EXHIBIT 32


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned executive officers of Tri County Financial Corporation (the
"Registrant")  hereby  certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                            By: /s/ Michael L. Middleton
                                                --------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Michael L. Middleton
                                                 Title: President and Chief
                                                        Executive Officer



                                            By: /s/ William J. Pasenelli
                                                --------------------------------
                                                 Name:  William J. Pasenelli
                                                 Title: Vice President and
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 22, 2004
VI 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1096 

For the relief of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2015 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Joseph Gabra and 

7 Sharon Kamel shall each be deemed to have been lawfully 

8 admitted to, and remained in, the United States, and shall 

9 be eligible for adjustment of status to that of an alien law10 fully admitted for permanent residence under section 245 

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

12 upon filing an application for such adjustment of status. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1096 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust3 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

4 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

5 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

6 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Joseph 

7 Gabra and Sharon Kamel, the Secretary of State shall in8 struct the proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current 

9 or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 

10 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 

11 birth of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel under section 

12 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

13 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

14 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 

15 birth of Joseph Gabra and Sharon Kamel under section 

16 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

17 (d) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

18 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You19 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

20 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

21 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

22 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

23 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

24 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
19462

#### State v. Kobashigawa

Affirmed
#### Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Island Ins. Co. Ltd.

19442

11/26/97

Vacated and Remanded