alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

  Exhibit 10(xv) - Amendment dated January 30, 2001 to the MAF Bancorp, Inc.
            Shareholder Value Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10(xv)

                           CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION



I, Carolyn Pihera, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting
Secretary of MAF Bancorp, Inc. and that the following is a true and correct copy
of certain Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of said Company at
their regular meeting held January 30, 2001, at which meeting a quorum of the
members of said Board were present and acting throughout:

WHEREAS, the MAF Bancorp Shareholder Value Long-Term Incentive Plan ("Long-Term
Plan") provides that the value of performance units awarded under the Long-Term
Incentive Plan shall be based on the Company's percentile rank in Total
Shareholder Return relative to the return of S&P 500 companies over the
Performance Period; and

WHEREAS, certain difficulties arising in the application of this standard
created the necessity for the Compensation Committee to make interpretations as
to the intent and meaning of this provision with respect to long-term bonuses
earned for the performance period ending on December 31, 1999 (as outlined in
the attached memorandum dated January 9, 2001); and

WHEREAS, the Board wishes, to the extent possible, to avoid uncertainty as to
the intent of the Plan, and

WHEREAS, the plan reference in section VI(6) to having the independent certified
public accountants determine the Company's percentile rank is not practical in
that auditors review and certify the Company's financial results but not stock
price rankings and the Board therefore wishes to eliminate this provision,

NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the following sentence shall be added
to the end of section VI(3) of the Long-Term Plan:

     The Company's percentile rank in Total Shareholder Return shall be
     determined by subtracting from 100%, the percentage determined by dividing
     the sum of (a) one, plus (b) the number of companies included in the S&P
     500 Index at the end of the applicable performance period who have a Total
     Shareholder Return greater than that of the Company, by (c) 501.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that section VI(6) of the Long-Term Plan shall be amended to
read as follows:
<PAGE>

Except as outlined in Section VII, all awards made under the Plan (i.e., cash)
shall be paid to Participants within 30 days after the date on which the
Company's percentile rank on a Total Shareholder Return basis among the S&P 500
companies has been determined in accordance with section VI(3).

I do further certify that the foregoing Resolutions have not been altered or
amended, but remain in force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate and affixed the Company's
seal this 2nd day of February, 2001.

MAF BANCORP, INC.

/s/ Carolyn Pihera
----------------------------------------
Carolyn Pihera, Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                CSB BANCORP, INC.

                                   EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30,                   September 30,
                                           ------------                    -------------
                                        2003            2002            2003            2002
                                     ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
     Net income                      $  338,685      $  635,657      $1,508,131      $1,516,904

     Weighted average
       common shares                  2,640,160       2,631,760       2,636,541       2,630,224
                                     ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
BASIC EARNINGS
     PER SHARE                       $     0.13      $     0.24      $     0.57      $     0.58
                                     ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
     Net income                      $  338,685      $  635,657      $1,508,131      $1,516,904

     Weighted average
       common shares                  2,640,160       2,631,760       2,636,541       2,630,224
     Weighted average effect of
       assumed stock options              2,218           3,032           3,478           3,740
                                     ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
     Total                            2,642,378       2,634,792       2,640,019       2,633,964
                                     ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
DILUTED EARNINGS
     PER SHARE                       $     0.13      $     0.24      $     0.57      $     0.58
                                     ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

</TABLE>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       19
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerPresident and
Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a -14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
otherwise stated in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 748 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 748

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that United States 
law firms should not represent Iran in any judicial proceeding or other 
  capacity to assist efforts of Iran to avoid paying compensation to 
                  victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2016

Mr. Jones submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that United States 
law firms should not represent Iran in any judicial proceeding or other 
  capacity to assist efforts of Iran to avoid paying compensation to 
                  victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism.

Whereas Iran has sponsored terrorism, including the 1996 Khobar Towers attacks, 
        the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon, the 1998 attacks on two 
        United States Embassies in Africa, a 1990 assassination in New York 
        City, and various other attacks;
Whereas the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon killed 220 Marines of the 
        1st Battalion, 8th Marines based in Camp Lejeune;
Whereas section 502 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 
        2012 allows assets of Iran held in the United States to be available for 
        paying judgments relating to Iran-sponsored terrorism; and
Whereas United States law firms represented Iran in Bank Markazi v. Peterson 
        before the United States Supreme Court thus assisting efforts of Iran to 
        avoid paying compensation to victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
United States law firms should not represent Iran in any judicial 
proceeding or other capacity to assist efforts of Iran to avoid paying 
compensation to victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism.
                                 <all>
```
### On **- board	Circulation	and	Seating	Subcommittee**  **(#5)** U.S.	Access	Board:	Rail	Vehicle s Access	Advisory	Committee Subcommittee	on	On
- board	Circulation	and	Seating

May	7,	2014 1:00

– 3 :00	Eastern 1.		Introductions 2.		Approval	of	the	Agenda (continued	from	March	26 th call) 3.		Review	of	major	points	from	March	20	meeting 3.1		Revised	Draft	vertical	access	document 4.		Vertical	Access	Discussion: The	goal	for	this	part	of	the	meeting	is	to	establish	proposed	physical requirements	that	will allow	for	the	creation	of	basic	floor	plans	and	options	that	will	facilitate more	concrete	discussion	and	help	us	formulate	recommendations. 4.1		Determine	Car	types	to	be	addressed 4.2		Lift	platform	size		X”	x	Y” 4.3		Seating	requirements
- scoping 4.3.1		Upper	level 4.3.2		Lower	level 4.4		Restroom	requirements
- scoping 4.4.1		Upper	level 4.4.2		Lower	level 4.5		Other	spatial	considerations 5.		On
- Board	Circulation: We	should	gather	all	the	known	shortcomings	of	what	has	been	done	under the	current	requirements.	Assume	that	we	have	arrived	through	the	side	door	and	are	moving	to the	accessible	area	of	the	vehicle.	Obviously	some	elements	listed	are	not	relevant	to	all modes while	others	are	basic	regardless	of	mode.	The	goal	of	this	exercise	is	to	create	a	list	of	known issues	including	mode	first	and	then	go	back	through	and	propose	recommendations	by	mode. With	these	proposals,	dimensional	plans	should	be	developed	so	impact	and	benefit	can	be discussed 5.1		Discuss	known	shortcomings	of	the	current	requirements
- technical	specifics 5.1.1		Car	entrance 5.1.2		Vestibule,	including	thresholds 5.1.3		Inter
- car	passage 5.1.4		Path	to	accessible	seating	area 5 .1.5		Wheelchair	Space 5.1.6		Wheelchair	storage 5.1.7		Priority	Seating 5.1.8		Seating	area	amenities	(window,	surfaces,	lighting,	power,	controls	etc) 5.1.9		Path	from	seating	area	to	the	restroom5.1.10		Doors	and	doorways,	including	operation

5.2		Identify	circulation	and	seating	issues	new	to	the	requirements 5.2.1		Space	for	service	animals	including	size	and	placement	relative	to	the	owner 5.2.2		Securement	devices 5.2.3		Emergency	Egress 5.2.3	Other 6.		Next	Steps 7.		Action	I tems 8.		Assignments 9.		Deadlines 10.		Next	Meeting
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00618-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.E., C.J.V., T.A.W., R.A.C., and S.S.H.

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-00277

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating 

appellants’ parental rights is AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are taxed against appellants.

SIGNED January 25, 2023.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 782 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 782

  Encouraging the people of the United States to honor the service of 
 military retirees who continue to serve the United States long after 
             such retirees have completed military service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2016

  Ms. Stefanik (for herself and Mr. Bishop of Georgia) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Encouraging the people of the United States to honor the service of 
 military retirees who continue to serve the United States long after 
             such retirees have completed military service.

Whereas there are 2,100,000 retirees of the Armed Forces of the United States 
        who have earned their retirement through career service or service-
        connected disability;
Whereas military retirees are dedicated, focused, well-trained, well-
        disciplined, and well-educated and bring the best qualities of United 
        States citizenship to lifelong service within the United States and 
        their local communities as stable, responsible, citizens, and neighbors;
Whereas those qualities often result in contributions to the civilian workforce 
        as experienced and dedicated employees, to local educational 
        institutions as teachers, counselors, and coaches, to local government 
        as elected public servants, and to communities as effective volunteer 
        leaders;
Whereas such dedication and focus brings balance and stability to local 
        communities; and
Whereas those contributions are the manifestation of the desire of military 
        retirees to continue lifelong service to the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives encourages the people 
of the United States to honor the past and continued service of 
military retirees to their communities and the United States long after 
such retirees have completed military service by supporting the goals 
and ideals of a ``Military Retiree Appreciation Day''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018381EN.01002602.xml

| 22.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 July 2018 — CdT v EUIPO

(Case T-417/18 R)

((Interim measures - Law governing the institutions - Translation services required for the functioning of EUIPO - Use of external contractors - Application for interim measures - No urgency))

(2018/C 381/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Translation Centre for the bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: J. Rikkert and M. M. Garnier, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: N. Bambara and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, first, for the suspension of operation of EUIPO’s decisions relating to measures intended to make it possible to use service providers other than the CdT for the translation services required for its functioning and, secondly, for an order requiring EUIPO to publish in the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union a notice suspending its call for tenders concerning the provision of translation services and not to sign contracts relating to that call for tenders.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
From: Heidi Haggerty

To: LEVIN, NANCY

Cc: Marina Mejia Subject: RE: Appendix 2

Date: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:27:53 AM

Hi Nancy,

Yes, that was an error. The correct reference is 40 CFR 5 2 .128, Appendix A (I) (B).

Heidi Haggerty

From: Marina Mejia

Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:15 AM

To: Heidi Haggerty <Haggerty.Heidi@azdeq.gov>

Cc: LEVIN, NANCY <Levin.Nancy@epa.gov> Subject: FW: Appendix 2

Hi Heidi,

Can you help Nancy please?

Thank you!

Marina

From: LEVIN, NANCY [ mailto:Levin.Nancy@epa.gov ]

Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:14 AM

To: Marina Mejia < Mejia.Marina@azdeq.gov > Subject: Appendix 2

Hi Marina,
I’m reviewing the rules submitted with the W. Pinal PM10 Plan and I noticed what

appears to be a typographical in AAC Appendix 2. Test Methods and Protocols Section L. “40 CFR 51.128, Appendix A(1)(B).” I believe the correct reference is “40
CFR 52.128 Appendix A(1)(B).” Can you confirm? Thanks.

-- Nancy

______________________________________________ Nancy Levin Air Rules Office

415.972.3848 levin.nancy@epa.gov
US EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St (AIR-4) San Francisco, CA 94105

NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged andconfidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you.
##### 



CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 11 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS Three Months EndedMarch 31,2004
    
    2003Basic Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    521,451
    
    
    $
    597,832Weighted average common shares
    
    
    2,644,350
    
    
    
    2,633,233Basic Earnings Per Share
    
    $
    .20
    
    
    $
    0.23Diluted Earnings Per ShareNet income
    
    $
    521,451
    
    
    $
    597,832Weighted average common shares
    
    
    2,644,350
    
    
    
    2,633,233Weighted average effect of assumed stock options
    
    
    3,726
    
    
    
    4,072Total
    
    
    2,648,076
    
    
    
    2,637,305Diluted Earnings Per Share
    
    $
    0.20
    
    
    $
    0.23
 16.
February 9, 2006

26720

#### State v. Carineo

Affirmed
#### State v. Kaakimaka

18512

3/21/97

Denied

84 Hawai'i 280, 933 P.2d 617
May 21, 1997

19500

#### State v. Kaai

Affirmed in part, Vacatec in part
<page>
				       EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Principal Plus
Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	/s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:	   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	   President

Date:	   March 30, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

p1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141869 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141869 

 COA: 291363 

Kalamazoo CC: 2008-000609-FH 

JEREMY DEAN WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
從夏威夷郵寄和運輸食品和農產品到美國本土

動植物健康檢驗局

植物防疫檢疫處

美國農業部

美國農業部 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA) 的

動植物健康檢驗局 (Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service, APHIS) 禁止或限制許多農產品從夏威夷輸入美

國本土,包括大多數的新鮮蔬果以及特定種類的植物與花

卉。這是因為這些物品可能藏有危險的偷渡者—入侵性害

蟲或疾病。只要攜帶一小塊帶有入侵性害蟲或疾病的水果

或植物,就有可能造成數百萬美元的損失,並導致代價高昂

的滅除工作、貿易收入損失與食品價格的上漲。 

所有農產品,包括新鮮水果和蔬菜、植物、花卉以及用植物

或木材製成的手工藝品,在將您的包裹帶到航空公司貨運

辦公室、郵局或其他快遞公司之前,必須先通過 APHIS 的

檢查確保無病蟲害。以郵件非法寄送違禁農產品者可能會

受到刑事或民事處罰。

新鮮水果與蔬菜

由於具有引入特定入侵性植物蟲害與疾病的風險,禁止從

夏威夷直接或經由阿拉斯加或關島運輸或郵寄大部分的新

鮮水果與蔬菜到美國本土。不過,也有一些特例。允許檢查

過的新鮮鳳梨和椰子。允許新鮮的木瓜、黃晶果、鳳梨釋迦、

香蕉、咖哩葉、火龍果、龍眼、荔枝、山竹、紅毛丹、楊桃和番

薯,但必須在 USDA 認可的設施處理,並且裝在適當標記

並蓋章的密封箱中。

允許運送或郵寄加工的水果和蔬菜。加工方法包括烹煮、乾

燥或冷凍。如果採用冷凍,則所有水果必須在檢查時為冷凍

固體狀態。冷凍芒果必須沒有果核。

更多關於許可的加工方法,請與 APHIS 聯繫。下一頁提供了

夏威夷當地 APHIS 辦事處的電話號碼。

允許進入美國本土的常見夏威夷物品

n 海灘沙子

n 椰子

n 銷售用罐頭食品

n 乾燥種子和裝飾品

n 鮮花、花環和樹葉(除了柑橘或與柑橘相關的花朵、葉子

或其他植物部位,以及玉樹藤或夏威夷豆)

n 銀劍(松蘿)

n 愛爾蘭或白肉馬鈴薯

n 新鮮鳳梨

n 加工水果,如木瓜、黃晶果、鳳梨釋迦、香蕉、咖哩葉、

火龍果、龍眼、荔枝、山竹、紅毛丹、楊桃和番薯1

n 植物和插枝2 

n 岩石和石頭

n 貝殼,非陸地蝸牛殼

n 種子花環與種子首飾

n 木材(包括浮木和木枝)和木玫瑰(乾)

1 這些水果必須經 USDA 認可的設施處理,並且裝在適當標記並蓋章的包裝箱中。

2 關於根莖類植物材料的許可,請聯絡夏威夷農業部。 
不允許進入美國本土的常見夏威夷物品

n 新鮮水果與蔬菜,但列為可接受的除外

n 任何種類的莓果,包括新鮮的咖啡莓果和海葡萄

n 仙人掌植物或仙人掌植物部位

n 棉花植物部位,包括棉鈴

n 玉藤和夏威夷豆的鮮花

n 牛茄子與新鮮的露兜樹果實

n 活的昆蟲與蝸牛

n 帶有果肉的種子和新鮮豆莢

n 土壤或任何種在土裡的植物

n 甘蔗

n 空心菜

n 蕃薯(生)

n 七里香

以上資訊隨時更新。最新資訊,請聯絡您當地的 APHIS 

辦公室:

Honolulu (808) 834-3220 

Kona (808) 326-1252

Kauai (808) 632-2511

Hilo (808) 933-6930

Maui (808) 877-5261 

有關如何取得植物和插枝許可的資訊,請聯絡夏威夷

農業部 (Hawaii Department of Agriculture):

Honolulu (808) 832-0566

Hilo (808) 974-4141

Kauai (808) 241-7135

Maui (808) 872-3848

Kona (808) 326-1077

更多資訊,請參考 APHIS 網站:

www.aphis.usda.gov/travel 

USDA是機會均等的提供者、雇主和貸方。 2017 年 7 月發行

PPQ-20-004TC(Traditional Chinese) 2020年二月略作修訂
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Items to Consider for No Tests/Inconclusive/Satisfactory Results 

Regarding Section V Safety Testing

CVB-WI-0133 03

ICWI0133.01

CVB-WI-IC

19 Aug 2021

CVB-Released