alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 932 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 932

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 6, 2016.
Whereas telephone companies are required to permit third parties to bill for 
        services on a consumer's monthly telephone bill in certain 
        circumstances;
Whereas ``cramming'' is the act of placing unauthorized charges on a wireline, 
        wireless, or bundled services telephone bill of a consumer;
Whereas the Federal Communications Commission estimates that cramming has harmed 
        tens of millions of people in the United States; and
Whereas existing protections against cramming have not prevented harm to 
        consumers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
protections against cramming should be improved and consumers should be 
empowered to stop unwanted third-party charges on their telephone bills.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
March 19, 1998

20679

#### Doe, In Interest of

Affirmed
19191

#### State v. Silva

Vacated
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0354

_____________________________
J OSEPH W. A TKINS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

R AY , C.J., and B ILBREY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Joseph W. Atkins, pro se
, Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
U.S. Department of Agriculture

Biotechnology Regulatory Services Permitting 

Assistant (BRSPA) Quick Reference

The BRSPA provides guidance on regulatory requirements for importation, interstate movement, and 

environmental release of organisms developed using genetic engineering. When BRS permits are required, the 

BRSPA will sort your outcomes into one or more Permit Applications. Follow the steps below to begin your 

request. Access the BRSPA at https://efile.aphis.usda.gov/s/brs-permitting-assistant

Step 1: Enter Your Organism’s Details and Search 

• Use the search fields to enter your organism’s details. 

o To see a complete list of organisms, select the See List of Organisms hyperlink.

o If your organism's name is not available in the list, please contact BRS.eFile@usda.gov. Provide 

the scientific and common names of the organism in your request. BRS will alert you once it is 

available for selection.

o Under What are you applying for:

 Select Help Me Decide to explore your organism's regulatory requirements.

 Select Permit if you know you want to apply for a permit.

• Once you have completed all required fields, select the search button.

Step 2: Select Attributes

• Select the attribute filters to further describe your organism’s 

characteristics and narrow your search results, if applicable. 

o Please complete the filters from top to bottom. 

o Complete all filters prior to selecting your outcome. 

o Select on the X icon or Clear All button to remove filters.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

1 Version 1.0

August 2021
Step 3: Select an Outcome

• Review the information on the Outcome Card.

• Select Add Outcome to add the outcome to your application.

Once you have selected 

and added your outcome, 

proceed and select Next 

Step to Review and 

Confirm Outcomes.

Step 4: Review and Confirm Outcomes

• Once your outcome(s) have been added, review and confirm your outcome(s) on the Request 

Summary page. Use the Summary of Requests section to see a brief summary of your 

outcome(s).

o To conduct another search and add additional outcomes, select the Go Back and Add 

More Outcomes button.

o If your request resulted in any permit applications, select the Proceed to Applications 

button to complete and submit your permit application(s). 

o If you would like to receive a link to your Request Summary, enter your email then select 

Send. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

2

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Version 1.0

August 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 841 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 841

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 6, 2016.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Mark Takai, a Representative from the State of Hawaii.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Technical Advisory Group for

Biological Control Agents of Weeds

Last Modified: 

Print

The Technical Advisory Group for Biological Control Agents of Weeds (TAG), an

independent voluntary committee, was first formed in 1957 to provide advice to

researchers. Today, TAG members review petitions for biological control of weeds

and provide an exchange of views, information and advice to researchers.

TAG Charter 

TAG Procedure Flowchart 

List of Submitted TAG Petitions 

Technical Advisory Group for Biological Control Agents of Weeds Manual (TAG-BCAW

Manual) 

World Catalog of Biological Control Agents and Their Target Weeds 

Contact Us

Individuals planning a release should contact the TAG early in the research program,

particularly where a plant is targeted for biological control for the first time in North

America. In your cover letter, please include the petitioner's name, affiliation, and a

contact point within North America, including address, telephone number, FAX, and

email address. Submit to the TAG Executive Secretary:
Ben Slager

Senior Entomologist

Email: benjamin.h.slager@usda.gov

Phone: 810-626-8841
# C_2021053EN.01001301.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS

(Case C-490/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs - Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Article 13(1)(d) - Practice liable to mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the product - Reproduction of the shape or appearance of a product which has a protected name - Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Morbier’)

(2021/C 53/15)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier

Defendant: Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs and Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs must be interpreted as meaning that they do not prohibit solely the use by a third party of a registered name.

Article 13(1)(d) of Regulation No 510/2006 and Article 13(1)(d) of Regulation No 1151/2012 must be interpreted as prohibiting the reproduction of the shape or appearance characterising a product covered by a registered name where that reproduction is liable to lead the consumer to believe that the product in question is covered by that registered name. It is necessary to assess whether such reproduction may mislead the European consumer, who is normally informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, taking into account all relevant factors in the case.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

---
October 19, 1999

22268

#### State v. Ah Nee

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1997
<CASH>                                           7,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,885
<PP&E>                                          39,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 652,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,234
<BONDS>                                        457,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           426
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   652,972
<SALES>                                        161,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,725
<CGS>                                          119,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### Reilly, Appellant, *v.*Prudential Insurance Co. of America.

*Insurance*— Foreign *insurance company*— License *of agent*— Col*lection of commissions by agent.*

, Where a contract between a foreign insurance company and its agent provided for commissions to the agent, on insurance written by him, such agent cannot recover commissions on insurance written during a period when he had not been authorized by the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Pennsylvania to .transact business in the State as the agent of the defendant.

*62Argued Feb. 3, 1919.

Appeal, No. 231, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., March T., 1917, No. 99, for defendant n. o. v. in case of Edward A. Reilly to the use of John Scott, Jr., and Samuel S. Hartranft, Administrator d. b. n. of Linn Hartranft, deceased, v. Prudential Insurance Company of America.

Before Brown, C. J., Stewart, Moschzisker, Walling and Simpson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit for commissions by an insurance agent against a foreign insurance company. Before Miller, J.

At the trial it appeared that on May 17,1900, plaintiff obtained an application to defendant company from Charles T. Schoen for a large policy of insurance on the latter’s life. Plaintiff was appointed an agent of the company on June 1, 1900. On the same day the policy was delivered and the premium paid. On June 14, 1900, a State license was procured by the plaintiff to act as defendant’s agent. The contract was terminated by mutual consent on July 21, 1901. Suit was brought to recover commissions on the Schoen and other policies. Verdict for plaintiff for $7,309.73.

The court, in an opinion by Miller, J., entered judgment for defendant n. o. v. The last paragraph of the opinion was as follows:

We, therefore, in conclusion and in order that the single reason that compels our action may be briefly set down at the end of this opinion, repeat that the plaintiffs cannot recover and the defendant is entitled to judgment only because when Mr. Reilly obtained the Schoen risk, he had not been authorized by the insurance commissioner to transact business in this State as an agent of the defendant foreign insurance company.

Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned*was in entering judgment for defendant n. o. v.

*63
      *Aaron S. Swartz, Jr.,*with him *John M. Dettra, Samuel H. High*and *Montgomery Evans,*for appellant.

*Frederick J.*Shoyer, with him *Henry Arronson,*for appellee.

February 24, 1919:

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed for the single reason given by the learned court below for entering it.
# C_2022002EN.01000201.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v ZV, AX, ‘Meditsinski tsentar po dermatologia i estetichna meditsina PRIMA DERM’ ООD

(Case C-319/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive 2014/42/EU - Scope - National legislation providing for the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the absence of a criminal conviction)

(2022/C 2/02)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo

Defendants: ZV, AX, ‘Meditsinski tsentar po dermatologia i estetichna meditsina PRIMA DERM’ ООD

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union, must be interpreted as not applying to legislation of a Member State which provides that confiscation of illegally obtained assets is to be ordered by a national court in the context of or following proceedings which do not relate to a finding of one or more criminal offences.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
# C_2018455EN.01003002.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/30

---

Action brought on 15 October 2018 — ZI v Commission

(Case T-618/18)

(2018/C 455/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZI (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the applicant’s husband affiliation to the JSIS; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the applicant’s husband affiliation to the JSIS;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging the unlawfulness of Article 13 of the Joint Rules on Sickness Insurance for officials of the European Union, in so far as that article breaches Article 72 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, since it restricts the scope thereof.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1332-E1333]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

INTRODUCTION OF THE GIVE WORKPLACE GENDER VIOLENCE VICTIMS THEIR DAY IN 
                           COURT ACT OF 2012

                                  _____
                                 

                        HON. CAROLYN B. MALONEY

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

  Mrs. MALONEY. Mr. Speaker, when at work, most employees feel safe 
from violent behavior; however, violence in the workplace is not 
uncommon. The Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates that in 2008, 
12,633 rapes and sexual assaults occurred while U.S. employees were 
working or on duty. When sexual violence happens at the workplace, 
women are often traumatized again when learning that the remedy is 
workers compensation. This downgrades the crime to an `on-the-job 
occurrence' and prevents victims from suing employers when the crime 
occurred due to lack of safeguards and protections by employers.
  Workers compensation systems were designed to create accident-free 
workplaces and allow employees hurt on the job to receive payment for 
medical expenses and lost wages. Using workers compensation as a way 
for employers to avoid lawsuits stemming from their own negligence is 
offensive to victims of this terrible crime. When sexual violence 
occurs on the job, employers should not be allowed to hide behind a 
system intended to compensate for job-related accidents. This is why I 
am reintroducing the Give Workplace

[[Page E1333]]

Gender Violence Victims Their Day in Court Act, which will prevent 
employers from invoking workers compensation when employer negligence 
results in the sexual assault and rape of an employee. This bill will 
help empower victims of workplace sexual assault to have their day in 
court instead of being subject to the exclusive remedy of workers 
compensation.
  Rape is not an accident and should never be regarded as an everyday, 
regular occurrence on the job. This legislation will enable victims and 
encourage employers to create a work environment free of sexual 
violence and send the message, loud and clear, that rape is not all in 
a day's work.

                          ____________________
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Greening of the Capitol Initiative Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    American Elm

Year
    2008

Location
      
Capitol Sqaure, S.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Ulmus americana 'Valley Forge'*
(Valley Forge American Elm)

To Commemorate the
Greening of the Capitol Initiative

Sponsored by
Speaker Nancy Pelosi

April 22, 2008 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 11.1
                              EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000


Net income
                                                       $  100,393
                                                       ==========
Average shares outstanding                                560,318
Basic earnings per share                               $     0.18
                                                       ==========


Average shares outstanding                                560,318
Dilutive average shares outstanding under
  warrants and options                                    263,800
Exercise price                                         $    10.00
Assumed proceeds on exercise                           $2,638,000
Average market value                                   $    10.60
Less:  Treasury stock purchased with assumed proceeds
       from exercise of warrants and options              248,868
Adjusted average shares - diluted                         575,250
Diluted earnings per share                             $     0.17
                                                       ==========


     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  value  is  derived from trades with one broker.  Private sales may occur
where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.


<PAGE>
EX-10.1(b)


 EXHIBIT 10.1(b) 

Appendix A to Executive Employment Letter dated December 22, 2016 

Executive: Gregory Barton 

Introductory Paragraph: 
 WTAM – Executive Vice
President-Operations and Chief Operating Officer 
 WTI – Same 

Employment Agreement dated October 8, 2012 
 Paragraph
1: 
 $300,000 
 Paragraph 3(a): 

None. Paragraph 3(a) is inapplicable to the named Executive. 

Paragraph 3(b): 
 January 14, 2014, January 28,
2015 and January 27, 2016 
 Paragraph 14: 
 Chief
Executive Officer 
 Paragraphs 4(j) and 14: 

Indemnification Agreement dated October 8, 2012
September 29, 2000

22489

#### State v. Milford; State v. Hartshorn; State v. Davis

Reversed
20154

#### State v. Kupukaa

Reversed
#### Shaw v. Bank of Hawai'i

19340

6/1/98

Affirmed in part & Reversed in part
October 29 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CASPIAN OIL SERVICES , INC. AND JAMES W. REYNOLDS , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 12

- 00535

- CV V.

SE MANAGEMENT, LLC , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, SE Management, LLC, was heard on the transcript of th e record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Caspian Oil Services, Inc. and James W. Reynolds, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this ap peal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.