alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1341]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 RECOGNIZING MARION COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. DANIEL WEBSTER

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, July 26, 2012

  Mr. WEBSTER. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to congratulate Marion County 
Public Schools on having some of America's best high schools. In their 
inaugural High School Challenge, a ranking of the nation's 19,000 best 
high schools, the Washington Post named four Marion County high 
schools--Belleview High School, Vanguard High School, North Marion High 
School, and Lake Weir High School--among America's top ten percent of 
high schools.
  In rating high schools, the High School Challenge considers the ratio 
of college-level tests administered to graduating seniors at a 
particular high school. The survey looks at the total number of 
Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), and Advanced 
International Certificate of Education (AICE) exams given at a school 
in a single academic year. This rating is intended to indicate the 
level of a high school's commitment to preparing their students for 
college, noting that students who face AP, IB, and AICE exams are 
better prepared for the rigors of college reading lists and 
examinations.
  This is not the first time that Marion County Public Schools have 
been recognized for their quality high schools. The U.S. News and World 
Report rankings of high schools has ranked nationally two Marion County 
high schools--Vanguard High School and Lake Weir High School--and 
recognized nationally three others: Belleview High School, Marion 
Technical Institute, and West Port High School.
  Marion County's dedication to quality high school education is 
evident from these recognitions. I applaud their commitment to their 
students and their community. May their example inspire many to follow 
in their footsteps.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 80

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                  the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

Mr. Goodlatte submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                  the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $15,580,600.00 for the One Hundred 
Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,768,700.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $7,811,900.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,259
<INVENTORY>                                      3,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,782
<PP&E>                                          77,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,144
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,386
<SALES>                                         27,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,271
<CGS>                                           19,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (875)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 49
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        49
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
From: Colon Miller

To: Finamore, Robert (OST)

Cc: Kruger, Brett (OST) ; artem@volga-dnepr.us

Subject: Emergency Transport for Ford Motor Co. / Additional Info

Date: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:36:01 PM

Importance: High

Bob,

Concerning the nature of the emergency request; Ford POCs have stated the

production line in Mexico has halted due to an engineering problem with the

automobile dies used in the MKZ and Ford Fusion models. These dies have had to

be removed from the plant in Mexico, transported via truck to Arizona for loading onto

airlift for immediate delivery to a manufacturing facility in Michigan for retooling, and

returned ASAP to Mexico to continue production. This halt in production is causing

delays in delivery and sales, impacting Ford’s ability to get the vehicles out of the

factory and to the public.

NON-OBJECTIONS

- We have received “Non-Objections” from all the U.S. Carriers

concerning the transportation of the automotive dies in the attached request. The

Charterer Active Aero Group on behalf of Ford Motor Company also obtained nonobjection replies, as the Charterer had contacted the U.S. Carriers prior to contacting

Volga-Dnepr. This equipment is very heavy and creates a concentrated footprint

during loading, jeopardizing damaging B-747 cargo floors. Possibility of trucking

versus flying presents several problems; (1) Time line required is too slow for transit,

(2) permit request for the long transit route would be lengthy and further add to the

hardships previously stated, (3) This is of an urgent nature and cannot wait for trucks

to move material over the road due to limitations of state by state permits for oversize

loads. (4) Over size loads can only be moved during the day time hours and in some

states along the route will not allow it to move during weekends. Please advise if you

need additional information, or if this meets with your acceptance.

Best regards,

Colon

COLON MILLER

VOLGA-DNEPR UNIQUE AIR CARGO

MILITARY OPERATIONS & KEY ACCOUNT MANAGER

OFFC- 832 585-8611

CELL - 713 298-7724

E-MAIL colon@volga-dnepr.us

______________________________________________________________________This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

______________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement of Ameriana Bancorp on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-04013, 333-56111 and 333-139711) of our report, dated, March 31, 2008, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Ameriana Bancorp as of December 31, 2007 and
2006 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report is included in Ameriana Bancorps Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ BKD, LLP         
|                     
|Indianapolis, Indiana
|March 31, 2008
# C_2020399EN.01001201.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union

(Case C-159/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic - Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant's name - Action for annulment)

(2020/C 399/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (represented by: E. Ruchat, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and S. Kyriakopoulou, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.

---
# C_2020240EN.01002201.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/22

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UO v Készenléti Rendőrség

(Case C-211/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Scope - Derogation - Article 1(3) - Directive 89/391/EEC - Article 2(2) - Activities of rapid intervention police officers)

(2020/C 240/29)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UO

Defendant: Készenléti Rendőrség

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that Article 2(1) and (2) of that directive applies to members of law enforcement agencies carrying out surveillance functions at the external borders of a Member State in the event of an influx of third-country nationals to those borders, except where it appears, having regard to all relevant circumstances, that the tasks carried out are being performed in the context of exceptional events, the gravity and scale of which require the adoption of measures indispensable for the protection of the life, health and safety of the community at large, measures the proper implementation of which would be jeopardised if all the rules laid down in that directive were to be observed, this being a matter for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31465

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES R. RESPERT,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-17-2-F

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James R. Respert appeals from his jury-verdict convictions

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately

two kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride, aiding and abetting the

attempted possession of approximately two kilograms of cocaine

hydrochloride, and carrying and possession of a firearm in

relation to a drug-trafficking crime. Respert argues that: (1)

the district court erroneously admitted hearsay testimony from a

coconspirator without establishing the existence of a conspiracy;

(2) the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to support
No. 00-31465

-2-

the jury’s verdict as to each of his convictions; and (3) the

district court erred by denying his motion for mistrial.

As Respert failed to move the district court for the

requisite showing to permit the admission of a coconspirator’s

hearsay testimony, this issue is reviewed only for plain error. 

See United States v. Miller, 799 F.2d 985, 989 (5th Cir. 1986). 

Examination of the evidence produced at trial relevant to this

issue indicate that there was no error, plain or otherwise.

A thorough review of the evidence produced at trial

indicates that a rational jury could have found that the

requisite elements for each of the charged offenses had been

proved beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Medina,

161 F.3d 867, 872 (5th Cir. 1998).

As Respert failed to object to the bases for his motion 

for mistrial, we review this issue only for plain error. See

United States v. Caucci, 635 F.2d 441, 448 (5th Cir. 1981). 

The evidence challenged by Respert as extrinsic was properly

construed to be intrinsic evidence that established background

information for the charged offense. See United States v.

Miranda, 248 F.3d 434, 440 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct.

410 (2001). Furthermore, the alleged prejudicial evidence did

not have a substantial impact on the jury’s verdict, when viewed

in light of the entire record. See United States v. Paul, 142

F.3d 836, 844 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the district court

did not plainly err by denying Respert’s motion for mistrial.

AFFIRMED.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

Te_XAS D~I?ARTM~~T Qlf CRIMINAL JUSTICE New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list 

SID Number: 

TDCJ Number: 

Name: 

Race: 

Gender: 

. 008: 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

50133915 

01909437 

CATT,HAYDEN SCOTT 

w 

M 

1991-12-07 

2022-11-08 

BYRD 

2022-11-08 

2017-11-08 

NO 

The offender is temporarily ineligible for visitation. Please call the offender's unit for any 

additional information. 

The visitation information is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. 

Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

. [ Parole Review lnfor~a,tion 

Offense History: I Offense County Case No. 

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=50133915 6/25/2015
November 25, 2002

VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO. 800.107

Subject: Policy for Changing Cells and Cell Substrates of Licensed Vaccines

To: Biologics Licensees, Permitees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum clarifies Center for Veterinary Biologics policy for obtaining approval 

to amend a filed Outline of Production to change the cell passage level or to change the

cell lines used in the manufacture of licensed vaccines.

II. BACKGROUND

The general requirements for testing of cell lines used in the production of veterinary 

biological products are outlined in 9 CFR 113.51 and 113. 52. When a licensee wishes to 

amend a filed Outline of Production to change the cell substrate(s) used for production of 

vaccines, e.g., increasing the passage level of the cell line, the policy (Veterinary 

Biologics Notice, February 26, 1993) has been to require that the Master Seed be retested 

for immunogenicity. However, due to current methodologies available, CVB maywaive 

the requirement for immunogenicity testing if it can be demonstrated that the change in 

substrates does not alter the microbial genome and/or protein profile of the organism or 

product.

III. POLICY

Approval of a change in substrate or culture conditions will require a retest for 

immunogenicity or data demonstrating that there are no detectable changes in the 

microbial genome or protein profile. The in vitro data may be generated by using a 

combination of assays including sequencing, Western blot, SDS PAGE, HPLC, mass 

spectrometry, or other appropriate methodologies. If a firm is considering a change in the 

cell substrate for a product, a proposal for generating the data to support the change 

should be submitted to the firm’s reviewer for evaluation and comment.

 /s/ W. Ron DeHaven

W. Ron DeHaven

Deputy Administrator

Veterinary Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/96 FORM
10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          71,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,848
<INVENTORY>                                    650,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,115,064
<PP&E>                                          91,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,187,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          785,782
<BONDS>                                        433,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           270
<OTHER-SE>                                    (37,078)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,187,960
<SALES>                                      5,551,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,551,671
<CGS>                                        5,249,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,249,238 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (7,242)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

Weida Communications, Inc.

 

Subsidiary List

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                                        |   | **Ownership** |   | **Jurisdiction  of Incorporation** |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                          |   |          |   |                               |   |
| SCL Ventures Ltd.                                             |   | 100%          |   | British Virgin Islands             |   |
| Ocean International Holdings Limited                          |   | 100%(1)       |   | Hong Kong                          |   |
| Ocean Tian Di Communication Technology Co.,  Ltd. (Guangzhou) |   | 100%(2)       |   | People’s Republic of China    |   |

 

----

(1) SCL Ventures Ltd. holds 99.99% of the registered capital of OceanInternational Holdings Limited.  Theremaining .01% of the registered capital of Ocean International HoldingsLimited is held by one of our executives as a nominal holder in order to meetlocal Hong Kong legal requirements.

 

(2) Ocean International Holdings Limited holds 100% of the registeredcapital of Ocean Tian Di Communication Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou), awholly-owned foreign enterprise established under the laws of the People’sRepublic of China.

 

1

----