alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,921
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,152
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,813
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,060
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          52,442
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,413
<LOANS>                                        174,039
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,986
<DEPOSITS>                                     233,528
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,793
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,123
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,940
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,188
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 278,986
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,374
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   586
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,303
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,242
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,965
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,338
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,603
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,603
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                        494
<LOANS-PAST>                                       566
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,121
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      189
<RECOVERIES>                                        41
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,273
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,572
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            702
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019399EN.01004901.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Unifarco v EUIPO — GD Tecnologie Interdisciplinari Farmaceutiche (TRICOPID)

(Case T-359/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark TRICOPID - Earlier national figurative mark TRICODIN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 399/58)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Unifarco SpA (Santa Giustina, Italy) (represented by: A. Perani and J. Graffer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: GD Tecnologie Interdisciplinari Farmaceutiche Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Pepe and M. Farinola, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2018 (Case R 2150/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between GD Tecnologie Interdisciplinari Farmaceutiche and Unifarco.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Unifarco SpA to pay the costs, including those incurred by GD Tecnologie Interdisciplinari Farmaceutiche Srl before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Unifarco SpA to pay the costs, including those incurred by GD Tecnologie Interdisciplinari Farmaceutiche Srl before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.

---
Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: .**''-!\~** \_,

# ;~;r.;**o~;~ o:O.<;~;r~~~~o:!yahoo** 

# com>
. ,;.**(1V,oC:~.,;** Faulk, Scott (OST) Faulk, Scott (OST) Reeve Air service to Tatitlek Ak**~.,.,s** '·':'n. ! "' : ''· ., LJ •. I

. I ! L /J. : : . .J

# s. 

# -----__...-

I am writing in regards to the service that Mike Reeve provides to our community. I am definitely in favor ofhis continued service as the fares are very reasonable, ifnot for his continued flights it would make travel near impossible for many community members. Mike has been very professional, considerate and helpful the times I have utilized his service. Many people, including myself are hopeful that he continues to offer the great service he provides. Thank you. Cory Totemoff 

### P 0 Box 103 Tatitlek, Ak 99677 (907) 461-7023

1
# C_2020077EN.01004301.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-292/18) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Portugal - Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 - Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Definition of national courts)

(2020/C 77/61)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, P. Estêvão, J. Saraiva de Almeida and P. Barros da Costa, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rechena and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/304 of 27 February 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2018 L 59, p. 3), in that it excludes from EU financing an amount of EUR 1 052 101,05 relating to expenditure declared by the Portuguese Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---
Exhibit
31.1
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Gary
M. De Laurentiis, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Itec Environmental Group, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 April 14,
2005
 
  /s/ Gary M. De Laurentiis
 
 Gary M.
De Laurentiis
 Chairman
& CEO
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. McKernan, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify in such capacity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;



2.    The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                            
|----------------------------
|Date: February 17, 2004     
|                            
|/s/    John R. McKernan, Jr.
|John R. McKernan, Jr.       
|Chief Executive Officer     



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert T. McDowell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify in such capacity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Date: February 17, 2004  
|                         
|/s/    Robert T. McDowell
|Robert T. McDowell       
|Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019305EN.01005302.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/53

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Audimas v EUIPO — Audi (AUDIMAS)

(Case T-467/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark AUDIMAS - Earlier EU word mark AUDI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 305/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Audimas AB (Kaunas, Lithuania) (represented by G. Domkutė-Lukauskienė, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2018 (Case R 2425/2017-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Audi and Audimas.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Audimas AB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Audimas AB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.

---
# Preventative Maintenance Checklist

(Text mainly from Pull_Up)

EVERY WEEK or EVERY 10 FLIGH TS, WHICHEVER SOONER:

- Check for damage, wear and crack on all the parts. - Check tightness of motor retaining screws and shell retaini ng screws in case some needed to be tightened up a bit. - Check motors move freely when spun by hand; - Turn motors shafts with your fingers and verify they are smooth without excessive play or binding (missing E clip? Loose bell housing screw? Bad bearings?). - Check batteries for number of cycles and discharge per DJI recommendations if required (Number of cycles can be

found in Vision Assistant): - Charge and discharge the battery completely once every 20 charge/discharge cycles. To discharge: when you come back from a flight and the % is fairly low, just hold it off in a hover at about a foot or two off the ground - it goes fairly quickly - when you get to 8%, ease off the thro ttle and lands it at about 7%. If you land and let it idle, it takes forever. Then recharge it to maximum capacity. This power cycling procedure will optimize the battery. - For long term storage, place the batte ry with only a 40~50% charge in a st rong battery box. Disc harge and charge

the battery once every 3 months to keep it in good condition. Charge amount should be varied in these maintenance charges - (40%~50%)—0%—100%—(40%~50%). - Purchase a new battery after your current battery has been discharged over 300 times. Completely discharge a battery prior to disposal. Please dispose of batteries properly.

- Warning: If current battery level is over 75% (4 Leds On/Flashing), the battery should be turned on before charging.

EVERY MONTH or EVERY 40 FLIGHTS, WHICHEVER SOONER:

- Link the Phantom to the RC & Vision Assistant Softwa re and check for Updates, Remote Control Sticks & IMU

Calibration state and if all battery cells have good balance (repeat for all batteries). - Clean data spring pins and battery contact pads with alcohol and swab or proprietary electrical contact cleaner and cycle spring pins several times to check for spring weakness and full unimpeded travel; - Check the Battery life:

ONCE/TWICE A YEAR OR WHEN YOU FEEL IT M IGH T BE NECESSARY (like after a major crash):

- Remove upper shell and check state of a ll wiring - plugs fully seated, condition of all solder joints, condition of

visible circuit boards and wiring runs, internals generally clean and no debris/loose items. - Remove motors and check security of E clips, condition of bearings and general visual inspection. - Check this out for a more visual description: How to do preventative maintenance checks, hints and tips

Page 41
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 886 

Recognizing November 26, 2016, as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally owned small 

businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. KING of Iowa, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Ms. HAHN, Mr. HANNA, Mr. PAYNE, 

Mr. HUELSKAMP, Ms. MENG, Mr. GIBSON, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. BRAT, 

Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. KNIGHT, 

Mr. MOULTON, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, Mr. HARDY, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, and Mr. DAVIDSON) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing November 26, 2016, as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness of 

the value of locally owned small businesses. 

Whereas there are over 28,700,000 small businesses in the 

United States; 

Whereas small businesses represent 99.7 percent of all businesses with employees in the United States; 

Whereas small businesses employ over 49 percent of the employees in the private sector in the United States; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 886 IH 

Whereas small businesses pay over 42 percent of the total 

payroll of the employees in the private sector in the 

United States; 

Whereas small businesses constitute nearly 98 percent of 

firms exporting goods; 

Whereas small businesses are responsible for more than 46 

percent of private sector output; 

Whereas small businesses generated 63 percent of net new 

jobs created over the past 20 years; and 

Whereas November 26, 2016, is an appropriate day to recognize ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and encourages the observance of 

3 ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’; and 

4 (2) supports efforts— 

5 (A) to encourage consumers to shop lo6 cally; and 

7 (B) to increase awareness of the value of 

8 locally owned small businesses and the impact 

9 of locally owned small businesses on the econ10 omy of the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Ito

18903

4/28/97

Denied

85 Hawai'i 44, 936 P.2d 1292
H. Res. 504 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 29, 2015. 

Resolved, That a message be sent to the Senate to inform that body that Paul D. Ryan, a Representative from the 

State of Wisconsin has been elected Speaker of the House of 

Representatives of the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### State v. Lanton

18229

4/17/97

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.1**
**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Todd S. Nelson, certify that:    1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2010 of Education Management Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2010     By: /s/ Todd S. Nelson       **Todd S. Nelson**
June 10, 2008

28277

#### State v. Blackwell

Affirmed
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

October 30, 1997

19578

#### Clark v. Wilson

Affirmed
#### Val Jean FINNEGAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. John W. FINNEGAN, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 13912.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 27, 1975.

*1160William G. Shelton, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Richard H. Moffat, John L. Young, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from an order modifying a divorce decree, changing the custody of a 14-year-old boy from his mother to his father. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

This case strictly is factual, disputatious somewhat, and equitable in nature. The trial court assessed the assertions' and testimony of the principals here, including interrogation of the boy in chambers in the presence of his mother, and in the absence of his father. Viewing the circumstances that unfolded in this case, it appears that the son apparently was very mature for his age, an A student, a deliberate runaway from home in order to be with his father, and recalcitrantly determined not to return, —all in an atmosphere of protracted domestic bickering about custody and other things.

The well known presumption of wisdom of the trial court in making a correct conclusion on the facts, in a scenario to be viewed in a light favorable to a child’s welfare, and consonant with the continued jurisdiction of the court in a matter like this, impel us to conclude, albeit heartache, in some measure, may attend the actors in such a too oft-repeated drama, that the trial court’s decision amply was supported by the circumstances confronting him,— and we so hold.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT, and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.