alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Harry Mund, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lapis Technologies,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

March 31, 2006


/s/ Harry Mund
-----------------------
Harry Mund
Chief Executive Officer
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 873 

Urging that the policy of the United States should be that Government 

institutions use security measures known as cryptographic splitting, the 

strongest available form of data centric security, to secure sensitive 

and personal information for data at rest and data in motion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 

Mr. ISRAEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Urging that the policy of the United States should be that 

Government institutions use security measures known 

as cryptographic splitting, the strongest available form 

of data centric security, to secure sensitive and personal 

information for data at rest and data in motion. 

Whereas public and private institutions and the critical infrastructure that are the backbone of our national and economic security are under constant attack; 

Whereas sensitive information housed within key institutions 

is being accessed, stolen, and runs the risk of being manipulated, critical systems are vulnerable, and national 

security and corporate secrets are at risk; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 873 IH 

Whereas information and infrastructure are most vulnerable 

when held by an institution or when traveling from point 

to point; 

Whereas network centric security is not sufficient to prevent 

a data breach, exfiltration, or manipulation of information; and 

Whereas what is needed in order to properly protect sensitive 

information is the strongest available form of data centric 

security: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the policy of the United States should 

2 be that Government institutions use security measures 

3 known as cryptographic splitting, the strongest available 

4 form of data centric security, to secure sensitive and per5 sonal information for data at rest and data in motion. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Order No. 97-41

18696

April 25, 1997

#### Williams v. State

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              36
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   463
<PP&E>                                             228
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (378)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1095
<SALES>                                            562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   562
<CGS>                                              408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (68)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (26)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (42)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (42)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.48


                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                      CRIT-CORNERSTONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


         CRIT-SC,  Inc.,  a  Virginia  corporation,  is the  general  partner of
CRIT-Cornerstone Limited Partnership (the "Partnership").

         The General Partner submits this Certificate of Limited Partnership for
filing in the office of the Virginia State Corporation  Commission in accordance
with ss. 50-73.11 of the Virginia  Revised Uniform Limited  Partnership Act (the
"Act"):

         1. The name of the Partnership is CRIT-Cornerstone Limited Partnership.

         2. (a)  The  post  office  and  street  address  of the  office  of the
Partnership at which the records of the Partnership required to be maintained by
ss. 50-73.8 of the Act shall be kept is:

                             306 East Main Street
                             Richmond, Virginia 23219
                             (City of Richmond, Virginia)

            (b) The  registered  agent of the  Partnership is James W. C. Canup,
who is a resident of Virginia and a member of the  Virginia  State Bar. The post
office address of the registered  agent is c/o McGuire,  Woods,  Battle & Boothe
LLP, One James Center,  901 East Cary Street,  Richmond,  Virginia  23219.  This
address is in the City of Richmond, Virginia.

         3. The name and post  office  address  of the  General  Partner  are as
follows:

                             CRIT-SC, Inc.
                             (a Virginia corporation)
                             306 East Main Street
                             Richmond, Virginia 23219

         4. The  Partnership  shall be  dissolved  and its  affairs  wound up on
December 31, 2100 or at such earlier time as is required by law or the agreement
of limited partnership of the Partnership.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the General Partner has executed this Certificate
of Limited Partnership as of December 22, 1999.

                                           CRIT-SC, INC.

                                           By:    /s/  Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------------
                                           Name:  Stanley J. Olander, Jr.
                                           Title: President
EXHIBIT 15.2 

 

May 5, 2004 

 

The Board of Directors 

Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries 

 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20057, 333-20073, 333-31398, 333-76096, 333-76654, 333-85518, 333-106270, 333-106271, 333-110706) pertaining to Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Deferred Compensation Plan, Stock Incentive Plans, andRetirement Plan of our reports dated November 6, 2003, February 12, 2004, and May 5, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Education Management Corporation that are included in its Forms 10-Q for thequarters ended September 30, 2003, December 31, 2003, and March 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Kathleen E. Donovan, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dendrite International, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:November 8, 2004

 
| /s/  Kathleen E. Donovan                            |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Kathleen  E. Donovan                                |
| Senior  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
16150

#### O'Neal v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

January 14, 1997

Order No. 97-3

Affirmed
Dual Path Platform (DPP) Submission Policy

Instructions to Designated Accredited Veterinarians

USDA APHIS Veterinary Services has recognized that some samples collected for the DPP 

assay for tuberculosis testing are not received at the National Veterinary Service Laboratories

(NVSL) in a timely manner consistent with the instructions provided in VS Guidance document 

6701.3 VSG 6701.3. Further, some samples are submitted to NVSL with incomplete VS10-4 

laboratory submission forms. Accredited veterinarians and specifically designated accredited 

veterinarians (DAVs) defined in 9 CFR 77.20 are specially trained and approved to collect serum 

samples for the DPP test. The DAV is responsible for collection of samples, preparation of 

samples, accurate completion of the VS 10-4 submission form and submission of samples to 

NVSL. To resolve the issue with delayed receipt and incomplete documentation, Veterinary 

Services is issuing VSG 6701.4 with the following instructions for accredited veterinarians, 

producers and regulatory officials.

1) Samples collected for DPP analysis must be received by NVSL no later than 5 days after 

the sample collection date. 

2) Samples must be shipped so that they are received by NVSL on Monday through Friday.

3) Samples must not be shipped for receipt by NVSL on weekends or holidays.

4) Sample submission forms must be accurate, complete and must include a sample 

collection date.

Samples received by NVSL more than five days after the sample collection date will be 

classified as invalid by the state epidemiology officer.

Samples submitted to NVSL without a collection date or other required information will be 

classified invalid by the state epidemiology officer until the submitting accredited veterinarian 

provides a corrected copy of the VS10-4 to the Area Veterinarian in Charge, State Animal Health 

Official and NVSL. Samples received on the weekend will be considered to have been received 

on the following Monday and classified invalid if this exceeds 5 days from the collection date. 

Samples received on a federal holiday will be considered received the following day and 

classified invalid if this exceeds 5 days from the collection date.

Samples received after 5 days or otherwise determined to be invalid will be processed at NVSL 

and user fees will be collected for this service. 

Repeated failures to comply with submission requirements may result in removal of DAV status. 

Falsification of collection dates or samples may result in removal of accreditation. 

Inquiries – please contact the State Animal Health official State Animal Health Official or Area 

Veterinarian in Charge Area Veterinarian in Charge of your respective state.
Safeguarding American Agriculture

 Federal Relay Service

 APHIS is an agency of USDA’s Marketing and Regulatory Programs (Voice/TTY/ASCII/Spanish)

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 1-800-877-8339

February 13, 2006 

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 06-03 

Subject: Potential Contamination of Porcine Kidney Cells 

To: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants 

 Veterinary Services Management Team 

 Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

 Area Veterinarians in Charge, VS 

 State Veterinarians 

I. PURPOSE 

The purpose of this notice is to inform interested parties that it has come to the attention of the 

Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) that some porcine kidney cell lines are contaminated with 

extraneous porcine circovirus type 1. This notice provides actions for licensees, permittees, and 

applicants to address this issue. 

II. BACKGROUND 

The CVB, under authority of the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act and Title 9 Code of Federal Regulations 

(9 CFR), requires that all veterinary biological products be tested and shown to be free of 

contaminating agents to ensure purity. Current requirements for cell lines used in the production 

of biologics, as specified in 9 CFR 113.52, include tests for detection of extraneous viruses by the 

detection of cytopathogenic and/or hemadsorbing agents and by the fluorescent antibody 

technique. 

III. ACTION

According to 9 CFR 113.47(b), under certain circumstances, additional testing for extraneous 

viruses may need to be conducted. Biologics licensees and permittees which manufacture or 

distribute products that utilize porcine kidney cell lines as a substrate should provide the CVB 

with data demonstrating that these cells are free of porcine circovirus type 1 contamination. 

Firms should provide their reviewers with this data within 6 months of the date of this notice. 

Upon review of the data, firms may be requested to submit Master Cell Stock samples to the 

CVB for extraneous agent testing by the fluorescent antibody technique described in 9 CFR 

113.47. In the event that testing by the firm or the CVB demonstrates the presence of porcine 

circovirus type 1 or any other contaminant, the firm should immediately cease preparation, 

distribution, and sale of products prepared with contaminated cell stocks. As required by 9 CFR 

116.5, if contaminants are discovered by the firm, the CVB must be immediately notified. 

/s/ Byron E. Rippke for 

Richard E. Hill, Jr. 

 Director 

 Center for Veterinary Biologics 

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection 

Service 

Veterinary Services 

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics 

510 S. 17th Street, 

Suite 104 

Ames, IA 50010 

(515) 232-5785 

FAX (515) 232-7120
# C_2019093EN.01002002.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/20

---

Appeal brought on 13 July 2018 by CeramTec GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 3 May 2018 in Case T-193/17: CeramTec GmbH v EUIPO

(Case C-463/18 P)

(2019/C 93/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: CeramTec GmbH (represented by: A. Renck, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 15 January 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
# C_2020433EN.01004202.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — GVN v Commission

(Case T-583/18) (1)

(State aid - Public transport of passengers - Offsetting of the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations - Obligation to establish maximum tariffs for pupils, students, apprentices and persons with reduced mobility - Article 7a of the Niedersächsisches Nahverkehrsgesetz (Law on local transport of the Land of Lower Saxony) - Decision not to raise objections - Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Transfer of financial resources from a Land to transport authorities at municipal level - Concept of aid)

(2020/C 433/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen e.V. (GVN) (Hannover, Germany) (represented by: C. Antweiler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Tomat and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, D. Klebs and S. Heimerl, acting as Agents) and Land Niedersachsen (Germany) (represented by: S. Barth and H. Gading, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 4385 final of 12 July 2018 not to raise objections to the measure adopted by the Land Niedersachsen under Article 7a of the Niedersächsisches Nahverkehrsgesetz [Case SA.46538 (2017/NN)] (OJ 2018 C 292, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen e.V. (GVN) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen e.V. (GVN) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Land Niedersachsen to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Land Niedersachsen to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
June 23, 1999

21842

#### State v. Davis

Affirmed