alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aandag alle 

skaap- en 

bokeienaars! 

Die meeste skape en bokke in die handel 

moet amptelike skrapie-plaatjies hê. 

Om amptelike skrapie-plaatjies te koop, moet u trop 

moet ’n trop-ID-nommer hê. U moet dit aan die 

plaatjiemaatskappy voorsien wanneer u plaatjies 

bestel. Bel asseblief 1-866-USDA-Tag (866-873-2824) 

om ’n trop-ID-nommer te versoek of om ’n eerste 

plaatjiebestelling te plaas. Skandeer hier vir die nuutste 

inligting oor skrapie-plaatjies. 

Is u nuut 

in die skaap- en bokidentifikasieprogram? 

Die Amerikaanse departement 

van landbou (USDA) sal tot 

100 plastiektrop-ID-plaatjies gratis 

aan nuwe deelnemers verskaf 

(solank fondse hou). 

USDA-goedgekeurde amptelike vervaardigers van skrapie-plaatjies 

AllFlex USA, Inc. 

Telefoon: 833-SCRAPIE (833-727-2743) 

Faks: 972-338-3445 

E-pos: scrapiefullaf@merck.com 

Aanlyn: www.allflex.global/na/product/scrapie-tags/ 

• Gewone en skrapievrye tropsertifiseringsprogram

 (SFCP)-plastiekplaatjies

• Radiofrekwensie-ID (RFID)

• Plastiekoorplaatjies in verskeie kleure

Premier 1 Supplies, LLC 

Telefoon: 800-282-6631 

Faks: 800-346-7992 

E-pos: info@premier1supplies.com 

Aanlyn: www.premier1supplies.com 

• Gewone en SFCP-plastiekplaatjies

• Plastiekoorplaatjies in verskeie kleure

National Band & Tag Company 

Telefoon: 859-261-2035 

Faks: 859-261-8247 

E-pos: tags@nationalband.com 

Aanlyn: www.nationalband.com/ 

• Metaaloorplaatjies in verskeie kleure

Shearwell North America, Inc. 

Telefoon: 800-778-6014 

E-pos: SalesUSA@shearwell.com 

Aanlyn: www.shearwell.com 

• Gewone en SFCP-plastiekplaatjies

• RFID

• Plastiekoorplaatjies in verskeie kleure

Plaatjie-toedieners is verskillend vir elke maatskappy se plaatjies. U moet toedieners op u eie koste aanskaf 

Hulle is nie by plaatjies ingesluit wat deur die USDA verskaf word nie. 

USDA is ’n verskaffer, werkgewer en lener wat gelyke geleenthede bied. Uitgereik September 2023 | APHIS-23-033
December 6, 2000

22990

#### State v. Fetoa

Affirmed
# C_2018104EN.01004901.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/49

---

Action brought on 23 January 2018 — Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v EUIPO — Heinrich Bauer Verlag (Brave Paper)

(Case T-37/18)

(2018/C 104/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Pruszczyk, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Heinrich Bauer Verlag KG (Hamburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Brave Paper’ — Application for registration No 13 774 211

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 November 2017 in Case R 391/2017-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the trademark to be registered for all applied goods and services; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the trademark to be registered for all applied goods and services;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2021206EN.01001101.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Armando Carvalho and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union

(Case C-565/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for annulment and for damages - Environment - 2030 climate and energy package - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Lack of individual concern)

(2021/C 206/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Armando Carvalho, Diogo Carvalho, Ildebrando Conceição, Alfredo Sendim, Joaquim Caxeiro, Renaud Feschet, Guylaine Feschet, Gabriel Feschet, Maurice Feschet, Geneviève Gassin, Roba Waku Guya, Fadhe Hussein Tache, Sado Guyo, Issa Guyo, Jibril Guyo, Adanoor Guyo, Mohammed Guyo, Petru Vlad, Ana Tricu, Petru Arin Vlad, Maria Ioana Vlad, Andrei Nicolae Vlad, Giorgio Davide Elter, Sara Burland, Soulail Elter, Alice Elter, Rosa Elter, Maria Elter, Maike Recktenwald, Michael Recktenwald, Lueke Recktenwald, Petero Qaloibau, Melania Cironiceva, Katarina Dimoto, Petero Jnr Qaloibau, Elisabeta Tokalau and Sáminuorra (represented by: G. Winter, Professor, H. Leith, Barrister, and by R. Verheyen, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Peternel, C. Ionescu Dima and A. Tamás, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: European Commission (represented by: A.C. Becker and J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Armando Carvalho and 36 other appellants whose names are set out in the annex to the present judgment to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Armando Carvalho and 36 other appellants whose names are set out in the annex to the present judgment to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85880-85881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m. EST, Wednesday, December 13, 2023.

PLACE: CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
(``Commission'' or ``CFTC'') will hold this meeting to consider the 
following matters:
    <bullet> Proposed Rule: Operational Resilience Framework for 
Futures Commission Merchants, Swap Dealers, and Major Swap 
Participants;
    <bullet> Proposed Rule: Capital and Financial Reporting 
Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants;
    <bullet> Proposed Rule: Protection of Clearing Member Funds Held by 
Derivatives Clearing Organizations;
    <bullet> Amended Application of Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC for 
Registration as a Derivatives Clearing Organization; and
    <bullet> Proposed Rule: Amendments to Swap Data Recordkeeping and 
Reporting Requirements.
    The agenda for this meeting will be available to the public and 
posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov. Members of 
the public are free to attend the meeting in person, or have the option 
to listen by phone or view a live stream. Instructions for listening to 
the meeting by phone and connecting to the live video stream will be 
posted on the Commission's website.
    In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting changes, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place 
of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's website.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary 
of the Commission, 202-418-5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.


[[Page 85881]]


    Dated: December 6, 2023.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-27175 Filed 12-7-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
# C_2019148EN.01006402.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/64

---

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO — New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX BRENT)

(Case T-760/18) (1)

(2019/C 148/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply491Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  David Crochet (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 11, 2021 - 12:04pmOne "good" think coming out of the impeachment trial...my discovery of the Voigt Clock.  Astounding piece, to be sure.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Alvin CONERLY, Appellant v. Warden S.A. YATES.

No. 05-1039.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Oct. 3, 2005.

Decided Oct. 11, 2005.

Alvin Conerly, Loretto, PA, pro se.

Stephen R. Cerutti, II, Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for Warden S.A. Yates.

Before: ALITO, SMITH and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Conerly appeals the District Court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his petition, Conerly challenged a decision of the United States Parole Commission. The District Court denied his petition and subsequent motion for reconsideration, and Conerly filed a timely notice of appeal.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review of the District Court’s legal conclusions is plenary, and we review the Parole Commission’s findings of facts for whether there is a rational basis for its conclusions in its statement of reasons. *Funari v. Allenwood Fed. Corr. Inst.,*218 F.3d 250, 254 (3d Cir.2000). The procedural history of this case and the details of Conerly’s claims are well-known to the parties, set forth in the District Court’s opinion, and need not be repeated here.

Conerly raises five issues on appeal. First, he contends that the District Court erred in failing to address one of his claims. Second, he asserts that the Commission did not consistently apply its regu*396lations in determining his severity offense category. He further argues that it employed the same criteria twice. Conerly contends that the Commission should have granted him credit for time served on his state sentence. Finally, Conerly asserts that the Commission disregarded his age at the time of his offense. After a review of the record and the arguments of the parties, we agree with the District Court’s resolution of these issues. Because the District Court addressed the issue of whether Conerly was entitled to credit for time in state custody in his other § 2241 petition, it did not err in failing to address the issue in this case.

Accordingly, for essentially the reasons set forth by the District Court, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
#### Poe v. City & County

15458

7/23/92

Denied
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Rust Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Filecoin Foundation for the Decentralized Web, Middletown, DE;                           ( print page 86936)                        Helsing, Munich, GERMANY; and JetBrains GmbH, München, GERMANY, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, JFrog Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Matter Labs, George Town, CAYMAN ISLANDS; Toyota Connected North America, Inc., Plano, TX; and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Tel Aviv, ISRAEL, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Rust Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 14, 2022, Rust Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 19, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 5, 2023 (88 FR 69234).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27560 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                     12,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,179
<PP&E>                                          86,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,387
<SALES>                                         45,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,612
<CGS>                                           28,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
March 28, 2001

22841

#### State v. Kay; State v. Hernandez-Escabedo; State v. Hernandez Ramos

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 659 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 659

 Expressing support for the designation of March 30, 2016, as ``World 
                             Bipolar Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2016

Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mrs. Dingell) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the designation of March 30, 2016, as ``World 
                             Bipolar Day''.

Whereas 2.6 percent of adults in the United States live with bipolar disorder;
Whereas bipolar disorder is the 6th leading cause of disability in the world;
Whereas bipolar disorder is a psychiatric disease that causes shifts in mood, 
        activity, and energy level;
Whereas persons with bipolar disorder may have psychotic symptoms, such as 
        hallucinations or delusions and of those with psychotic symptoms, 40 
        percent experience Anosognosia a neurological impairment which results 
        in ``lack of insight'' into one's condition;
Whereas individuals with bipolar disorder often encounter damaged relationships 
        and poor job or school performance;
Whereas the median age of onset for bipolar disorder is 25 years;
Whereas 51 percent of individuals with bipolar disorder go untreated during any 
        given year;
Whereas 65 percent of individuals on Medicaid with bipolar disorder do not 
        receive a continuous supply of evidence-based treatment;
Whereas bipolar disorder results in a 9.2-year reduction in expected life span;
Whereas 15 percent to 17 percent of people with bipolar disorder take their own 
        lives;
Whereas although there is no cure for bipolar disorder, it can be effectively 
        treated and treatment can help reduce the frequency and severity of 
        episodes;
Whereas early intervention, proper diagnosis, and treatment help people with 
        bipolar disorder lead healthy and productive lives; and
Whereas, March 30, 2016, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``World 
        Bipolar Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``World Bipolar Day'' to 
        raise awareness and erase social stigma associated with bipolar 
        disorder;
            (2) supports improved sensitivity towards those struggling 
        with bipolar disorder;
            (3) supports comprehensive mental health reform; and
            (4) encourages all to draw on ``World Bipolar Day'' as an 
        opportunity to promote mental well-being and awareness, ensure 
        access to appropriate services, and support overall quality of 
        life for those living with bipolar disorder.
                                 <all>
```
CLD

- 105 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12

- 3763

___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.
ARTHUR D’ AMARIO, Appellant

____________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Crim inal No. 1

- 06

- cr
- 00112

- 001 ) District Judge: Honorable Paul S. Diamond

____________________________________ Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 January 31, 2013
Before: RENDELL, JORDAN and GARTH , Circuit Judges (Opinion filed : February 13, 2013 )

_________ OPINION OF THE COURT

_________ PER CURIAM Arthur D’Amario appeals the District Court’s order denying his mot ion to transfer his supervision to the District of Rhode Island. For the reasons below, we will affirm the
District Court’s order.2 D’Amario is serving three years of supervised release after completing a sentence of 84 months in prison for threatening a federal judge. See United States v. D’Amario , 330 F. App’x 409 (3d Cir. 2009). In September 2012 , he filed a counseled motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3605 seeking to have his supervision transferred to the District of
Rhode Island. The District Court de nied the motion, and D’Amario filed a pro se notice of appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Section 3605 provides that a District Court may transfer jurisdiction over a defendant on supervised release to any
other district with the concurr e nce of the receiving district. D’Amario has not shown that

t he District Court for the District of Rhode Island has concurred in the transfer. Because
the District of Rhode Island has not concurred , the District Court did not err in denying
D’Amar io’s motion. Summary action is appropriate if there is no substantial question presented in the appeal. See Third Circuit LAR 27.4. For the above reasons, we will summarily affirm
the District Court’s order. See Third Circuit I.O.P. 10.6. D’Amario’s motion for summary action is denied.