alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Form 10-Q*”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

 
| February 8,   2011 |   |                       |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                    |   |                       |
|                    | By:    | /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER |
|                    |   | Christopher R. Gardner     |
|                    |   | *Chief Executive Officer*  |

 

I, Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Form 10-Q*”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

 
| February 8,   2011 |   |                      |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                    |   |                      |
|                    | By:    | /S/ RICHARD C. YONKER     |
|                    |   | Richard C. Yonker         |
|                    |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Moche v. Tanaka

17190

9/12/95

Affirmed
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Dodds, Appellant, et al.

(No. 32019

Decided January 25, 1950.)

*Mr. Herbert S. Duffy,*attorney general, *Mr. T. Vincent Martin*and *Mr. John W. Bolin,*for appellee.

*Mr. Samuel B. Ershine*and *Mr. Francis H. White,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taft, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Ilia Lekach,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Ilia Lekach
-----------------------------------
Ilia Lekach
Chief Executive Officer
December 12, 2003


                                       21
# C_2019093EN.01006002.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/60

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Grupo Bimbo (ETI Bumbo)

(Case T-368/18) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark ETI Bumbo - Earlier EU figurative mark BIMBO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Relevant public - Similarity of the signs - Distinctiveness of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 93/78)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Eskişehir, Turkey) (represented by: D. Cañadas Arcas, P. Merino Baylos, D. Gómez Sánchez and N. Martínez de las Rivas Malagón, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico, Mexico) (represented by: N. A. Fernández-Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 April 2018 (Case R 1459/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Grupo Bimbo and ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, D. Geoffrey Shulman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: May 4, 2004                     /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                      -----------------------
                                      D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                      President and Chief Executive
                                      Officer (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2019139EN.01005601.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/56

---

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament

(Case T-375/18) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Institutional law - European Parliament - Work of a delegation outside the European Union - Decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan - List of the persons authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan which did not include the name of the applicant - Period within which an action must be brought - Late submission - Measure not open to challenge - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for, primarily, the annulment of the decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan of 20 March 2018, listing the persons who were authorised to participate in an interparliamentary meeting in Japan and, in the alternative, the annulment of two decisions of implied refusal, and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU, for repair of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that measure.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.

---
Docket No. FAA-2011-0999

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10/7/10 ---

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer 10/7/10 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/7/10 ---

ATA Craig Fabian 10/7/10 ---
H. Res. 803 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 6, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 4361) to amend section 3554 of title 44, United States 

Code, to provide for enhanced security of Federal information 

systems, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and amendments specified in this section and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 

recommended by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to 

consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
2 

•HRES 803 EH 

under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a 

substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 

114–59. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment 

to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in 

order except those printed in the report of the Committee on 

Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment 

may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 

be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall 

be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 

points of order against such amendments are waived. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as 

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
3 

•HRES 803 EH 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of July 7, 2016, or July 8, 2016, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as though 

under clause 1 of rule XV, relating to a measure addressing 

the Federal Aviation Administration. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
June 27, 2002

24032

#### State v. Montero

Vacated and Remanded
Adulto

La parte superior del 

abdomen debajo de 

las alas es color rojo 

purpurino metálico, 

que puede verse 

cuando tiene las alas 

abiertas.

Los adultos tienen 

cubiertas sobre las 

alas de color verde 

esmeralda metálico y 

usualmente son color 

bronce o verde dorado.

Huevo(s) Larva(s) 

Las larvas miden alrededor 

de 1 pulgada de largo y son 

de color blanco o crema.

CICLO DE VIDA

BARRENADOR 

ESMERALDA 

DEL FRESNO

Huevo(s)

Adulto

bronce o verde dorado.

Los escarabajos adultos 

son delgados y miden 

media pulgada. 

Los machos son más 

pequeños que las hembras.
FÍJESEEN LO SIGUIENTE

• Muerte regresiva del follaje que usualmente empieza en el 

tope del árbol

• Retoños que brotan en el tronco a medida que las partes 

superiores del árbol mueren

• Agujeros de salida en forma de D

• Fisuras verticales en la corteza por las que se ven galerías

ELDAÑO QUE CAUSA

Las larvas del barrenador esmeralda del fresno se 

alimentan debajo de la corteza del árbol, lo que afecta 

la transmisión de los nutrientes y el agua. El follaje se 

vuelve amarillo, disminuye y se marchita, y la fronda 

disminuye y se vuelve poco densa antes de la muerte 

posterior del árbol.

LO QUE USTED PUEDE HACER

• No mueva la leña cruda. Compre leña local; prenda leña local.

• Hable con sus amigos y vecinos sobre el barrenador 

esmeralda del fresno y conozca las reglas estatales y 

federales.

• Si recibe fresnos de vivero o leña de fresnos, pregunte 

sobre su punto de origen y su proveedor. Puede haber 

larvas escondidas bajo la corteza.

• La detección temprana es importante, así que 

inspeccione los árboles con regularidad y reporte todo 

signo o señal en PlagasHambrientas.com.

Agujeros en forma de D Falta de corteza que revela galerías

Muerte regresiva del follaje Retoños en parte inferior del árbol

Para obtener más información, visite: 

Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección Sanitaria de Animales y Plantas

El Departamento de Agricultura de EEUU es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece igualdad de 

oportunidades. Material del programa núm. 2125-EAB-S Publicado en septiembre de 2012

PLAGASHAMBRIENTAS.COM
Exhibit 99-2


     FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND


NEW YORK, NY:  September 24, 2007 - Financial Federal Corporation
(NYSE: FIF) today announced its Board of Directors declared a $0.15
per share quarterly dividend on its common stock.  The dividend is
payable October 26, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on October 10, 2007.  The dividend rate is the same as the
prior quarter.


Financial Federal Corporation is an independent financial services
company specializing in financing construction, road transportation
and refuse equipment through installment sales and leasing programs
for dealers, manufacturers and end users nationwide.  For more
information, please visit www.financialfederal.com.


CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth
          Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGAININ
PHARMACEUTICAL INC.'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,317
<SECURITIES>                                     8,933
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,462
<PP&E>                                           4,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              507
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,041
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,487)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 8, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 134 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-101, CP2024-105.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-27412 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
24212

#### Roe v. Price

Affirmed
# C_2019255EN.01001501.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/15

---

Appeal brought on 18 December 2018 by FCA US LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 18 October 2018 in Case T-109/17: FCA US v EUIPO — Busbridge

(Case C-795/18 P)

(2019/C 255/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: FCA US LLC (represented by: C. Morcom QC)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 20 June 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
#### Terence S. CHANCELLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-2475

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 2017

Decided July 19, 2017

Terence S. Chancellor, Glenwood, IL, Pro Se.

Michael J. Weik, Jonathan D. Nusgart, Attorneys, Smith & Weik, LLC, Oak Park, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

*507Before POSNER, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff reached an oral agreement to settle a litigation arising out of a home mortgage loan to him, but the defendants insisted that as part of the settlement he would have to release any claims he had against another bank, and also a trust company, neither of which had been a party to the litigation. Although the district judge agreed with the defendants’ position, it hasn’t been proved that anyone had told the plaintiff during the settlement conference that by agreeing to the settlement he would also be releasing any claim he might have against the two nonparties to the litigation. Because there was no evidentia-ry proceeding, there was no basis for the judge’s deciding that the plaintiff had agreed to release the claims against the nonparties. The judgment must therefore be vacated and the case remanded for a factual inquiry into the parties’ disagreement.
#### Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd. v. First Ins. Co. of Hawai‘i, Ltd.

16499

6/24/94

Granted

875 P.2d 894
# C_2019082EN.01005601.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/56

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Multifit v EUIPO (MULTIFIT)

(Case T-98/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark MULTIFIT - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 82/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino, D. Walicka, M. Fischer and M. Eberl, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 November 2017 (Case R 846/2017-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign MULTIFIT as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Multifit Tiernahrungs GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---