alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 791 

Supporting the recognition of 2016 as the ‘‘Year of Pulse Crops’’ and acknowledging the nutritional benefit and important contribution to soil 

health of pulse crops. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2016 

Mr. MOOLENAAR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the recognition of 2016 as the ‘‘Year of Pulse 

Crops’’ and acknowledging the nutritional benefit and 

important contribution to soil health of pulse crops. 

Whereas the United States will celebrate 2016 as the ‘‘Year 

of Pulse Crops’’; 

Whereas the 68th United Nations General Assembly declared 

2016 as the International Year of Pulses; 

Whereas a pulse crop is a dry, edible seed of a plant in the 

legume family, including a dry bean, dry pea, lentil, or 

chickpea; 

Whereas pulse crops are grown in abundance in Arizona, 

California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, MinVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:47 Jun 16, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR791.IH HR791

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 791 IH 

nesota, Montana, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, 

Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, 

and Wyoming; 

Whereas pulse crops are an important component of a nutritious diet and are high in plant-based protein, vitamins, 

fiber, and minerals, including iron, potassium, magnesium, and zinc; 

Whereas pulse crops help prevent serious and chronic illness, 

including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and stroke; 

Whereas legumes serve as an important rotation crop, keep 

soil fertile, and improve overall soil health by replenishing 

nitrogen; 

Whereas pulse crops provide food security and nutrition to 

much of the developing world as low-cost sources of protein; and 

Whereas pulse crops are important economic development 

crops for small farmers, for both domestic production and 

export potential: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives sup2 ports— 

3 (1) the recognition of the ‘‘Year of Pulse 

4 Crops’’; 

5 (2) the participation by representatives of the 

6 Federal Government in events and activities orga7 nized pursuant to the observance by the United Na8 tions of the International Year of Pulses; and 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 791 IH 

1 (3) the future funding of programs to support 

2 the cultivation and consumption of pulse crops. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129403 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, CASSANDRA DAVIS, Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of ELSIE BAXTER, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129403 COA: 250880 Oakland CC: 2003-049054-NO BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0406 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 13, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      STATE OR OTHER
                                                            PERCENTAGE                  JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARIES (1)                                               OWNED                OF INCORPORATION
----------------                                            ----------              ----------------
<S>                                                            <C>                   <C>
Ameriana Bank and Trust, SB (2)                                100%                  United States

Ameriana Insurance Agency, Inc. (3)                            100%                  Indiana

Ameriana Financial Services, Inc. (3)                          100%                  Indiana

Deer Park Service Corporation (3)                              100%                  Ohio

Family Financial Life Insurance Company (4)                     14%                  Louisiana

Indiana Title Insurance Company, LLC (5)                        21%                  Indiana
<FN>
_____________
(1)  Operations of the Company's wholly-owned direct subsidiaries, Ameriana Bank
     and Trust, SB and Ameriana Bank and Trust, SB's wholly-owned  subsidiaries,
     Ameriana Insurance Agency, Inc, Ameriana Financial Services,  Inc. and Deer
     Park  Service  Corporation,  are  included  in the  Company's  consolidated
     financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)  First-tier subsidiary of the Company.
(3)  Second-tier  subsidiary  of the  Company  100% owned by  Ameriana  Bank and
     Trust, SB, a first-tier subsidiary of the Company.
(4)  Third-tier  subsidiary of the Company 1/7th owned through stock  investment
     and less  than  1/7th  owned  through  partnership  interests  of  Ameriana
     Financial  Services,  Inc., a  second-tier  subsidiary  of the Company 100%
     owned by  Ameriana  Bank and  Trust,  SB, a  first-tier  subsidiary  of the
     Company.
(5)  Third-tier  subsidiary of the Company owned through  investment of Ameriana
     Financial  Services,  Inc. a second-tier  subsidiary of the Company 100% by
     Ameriana Bank and Trust, SB, a first-tier subsidiary of the Company.
</FN>
</TABLE>
#### Florida East Coast Ry. Co., *Plaintiff in*Error, v. Dartha Carter and Ezekiel M. Carter, Her Husband, *Defendants in Error.*

Opinion Filed February 16, 1915.

A judgment upon a second verdict for the plaintiff will not be reversed where the evidence is sufficient in law to sustain the verdict, and technical errors, if any, in the proceedings do not appear to have been harmful to the defendant, even though ,:he second verdict exceeds the first in amount, where the award is not so palpably excessive as to justify interference by an appellate court.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court'for Duval County; D. A Simmons, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

*Alex St. Glair-Abrams,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*A. H. King & Roswell King*and *Bisbee & Bedell,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This writ of error is to a judgment for $15,000.00 damages for personal injuries. A previous judgment for $12,500.00 was reversed, because of an erroneous and apparently harmful charge given to the jury. Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Carter, 67 Fla. 335, 65 South. Rep. 254. A new trial was awarded to determine the liability of the defendant as well as the recoverable damages, if any, there being evidence tending to show negligence on the part of the plaintiff, which, under the statute, the jury might regard, if found to exist, as affecting the liability of the defendant, or as affecting *154merely the amount of the damages. Otherwise the new trial granted might, under Chapter 6467, Acts of 1913, have been limited to the issues relative to the recoverable damages. See Garzo v. J. H. Brophy Const. Co., 66 Fla. 607, 64 South. Rep. 234.

The issues relating to liability, contributory negligence and recoverable damages were fully and fairly submitted to the jury and determined in favor of the plaintiff. There was evidence upon which liability could lawfully be predicated; and upon a consideration of all the facts and circumstances in evidence, contributory negligence does not appear as matter of law. The conflicts in the testimony- and the credibility of the witnesses have been determined by the jury, and there is nothing in the record to show the verdict to be contrary to law or to indicate that the jury were not governed by the evidence in finding the verdict that has been approved by the trial court, the evidence as to the circumstances of the injury being more full this time. Technical errors, if any, in giving or refusing charges, or in rulings upon proffered evidence, do not appear to have been harmful to the defendant railroad company. While the amount awarded is greater than that of the former verdict, it is not so palpably excessive as to justify an appellate court in setting aside a second verdict for the plaintiff in a case like this, where substantial damages may be allowed upon a finding of liability. See Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co. v. Ruff, decided at this term.

The judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.
March 2023

There were 7 surveillance inspections conducted at 7 different sites for a total of 35

fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities. The 

water temperatures remained steady. Routine harvest continued. One site was 

identified as Category 2 and will increase sampling frequency. All other sites with fish 

in the water remained Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

April 2022 69 0 24778

May 2022 55 0 24833

June 2022 104 0 24937

July 2022 120 1 25057

August 2022 81 0 25138

September 2022 74 0 25212

October 2022 66 0 25278

November 2022 55 0 25333

December 2022 69 0 25402

January 2023 100 0 25502

February 2023 74 0 25576

March 2023 35 0 25611
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18United States Code**

The undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officerof Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certifies thatthe Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2005, filed with the United States Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to thePartnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Date: October 28, 2005 |                            |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|
| * *                    | /s/ DAN C. TUTCHER              |
| * *                    | Dan C. Tutcher                  |
| * *                    | *President*                     |
| * *                    | *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
FOR INFORMATION AND ACTION

DA-2022-01

January 11, 2022

Subject: APHIS Removes Pale Cyst Nematode (Globodera pallida) Associated Fields

From Regulation in Idaho

To: State and Territory Agricultural Regulatory Officials

On November 22, 2021, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) released three

pale cyst nematode (PCN) associated fields, which have a combined area of approximately 513

acres, from regulation in Idaho. One field is in Bingham County, and the other two fields are in 

Bonneville County. APHIS released the fields because the fields have completed a release 

protocol comprised of a sequence of surveys with negative laboratory results for PCN, in 

accordance with 7 CFR §301.86, subpart 3(d)(2).

With these changes, the current regulated area is 6,570 acres, of which 3,446 acres are infested 

fields and 3,124 are associated fields. The infested fields are in an 8.5-mile radius that spans a 

portion of northern Bingham County and southern Bonneville County.

APHIS will follow up with a notice of this change to the regulated area in the Federal Register. 

The specific PCN-regulated areas are listed on the following website:

https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pestsand-diseases/nematode/pcn

For additional information about the PCN program, please contact the National Policy Manager, 

Lynn Evans-Goldner, at (301) 851-2286.

Mark L Davidson, DVM, MS

Acting Deputy Administrator

Plant Protection and Quarantine
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27359]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 88 FR 84348 
(December 5, 2023).

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: December 11, 2023, 
1:30 p.m. EST.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: This meeting has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Nicole Stinson, Associate General 
Counsel, (202) 683-7117 or [email protected].

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: December 8, 2023.
Natalia Mandrus,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023-27359 Filed 12-8-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
```
22038

#### State v. Tomas

Affirmed
20041

#### State v. Lewis

April 16, 1997

Order No. 97-39

Affirmed
June 2019

There were 13 surveillance inspections conducted at 13 different sites for a total of 

123 fish sampled this month. Samples are targeted to moribund and fresh mortalities 

when possible. Spring stocking was completed. Routine harvest continued.The water 

temperatures continued to increase in response to warmer air temperatures. There 

were no cages confirmed this month. All of the sites with fish in the water remained 

Category 1 and were scheduled for monthly sampling.

Date Number of 

Samples

Confirmed Positive Cages Cumulative 

Program Samples

July 2018 50 0 20549

August 2018 50 0 20599

September 2018 40 0 20639

October 2018 40 0 20679

November 2018 40 0 20719

December 2018 45 0 20764

January 2019 40 0 20804

February 2019 50 0 20854

March 2019 115 0 20969

April 2019 108 0 21077

May 2019 92 0 21169

June 2019 123 0 21292
/ . 

June 28, 1954 

I ; ; ., .., : 

Hon. Ro&rt S: Calverf 

Co.mptroller of Public Accounts 

.’ 

Cdpilol’statidn 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No, S-13 1 

Re: Applicability of the stock transfer tax, 

Article 7047m. V.C.S., to the surrender 

,. of preferred stock for the issuance of 

Coinmon stock to the same person in 

a.ccordance with conversion privileges, 

..‘.. 

,Dear Mr. Calveit: 

the exc!lange affecting neither the capital nor surplus of the corporation. 

Ybur request fdr an opinion from this office is, in substance, as follows: 

Does the stock.transfer tax, Article 7047m, 

V.C.S., accrue oh the surrender of preferred stock 

for an issuance of Common stock in accordance with 

the conversion privilege of the corporate charter? 

The same person who surrendered the preferred 

stock received the c’ommon stock and neither the 

capital nor the surplus of the corporation is increased, 

There Are tw? prior Attorney General’s Opinions, Nos. 

O-3792 and O-4339, which touch on this question. 

Section 1 of Article 7047m, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, erilbod&s the tax and specifies the transactions on whiCh tlie li&iity accrue&. 

This section is too lengthy to set out. The legal issue is whether the language taxing “transfer% of shares n is applicable to this type of transaction. 

This office is of’ the opinion that the tax d&Z n&t accrue 

under the fact ‘situation set out in your letter of inquiry. 

We have been unable to locate a Texas decisioa directly in 

point; however, we have had available the federal cases and rulings by the 

internal Revenue Service. We quote a ruling from a Bureau letter dated 

July 25, 1941, to which the Internal Revenue Service still adheres, as 

follows: 

“Where stockholders owning convertible preferred 

stock exercise the conversion privilege, there is no stock 
Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (S-131) 

transfer tax on the preferred stock turned in and no 

tax liability on the issue of the common stock, if the 

capital of the corporation is not thereby increased.” 

(See 413 CCH, Para. 6466.) 

This office is of the opinion that had the common stock been 

issued to some person other than the one :who surrendered the preferred 

stock that a tax liability under Article 7047m. V.C.S. would accrue. 

This opinion overrules prior Attorney General’s Opinion No. 

O-3792, insofar as that opinion is in conflict herewith. 

SUMMARY 

No tax liability accrnes under the stock transfer 

tax, Article 7047m. V.C.S., when preferred stock is suriendered for ‘the issuance of common stock to the same 

person b accordance with conversion priViLegea when 

such an exchange does not affect the capital or surplus 

of the corporation. Attorney General’s Opinion No. 

O-3792 is, overruled insofar as it is in conflict herewith. 

, 

APPROVED: Yours very truly, 

W. V. Geppert JOHN BEN SHEPPERD 

Taxation Division Attorney General 

W. H. Holloway 

Reviewer 

J. A. Amis, Jr. 

Reviewer 

John Ben Shepperd 

Attorney General 

WWG:hp 

By ~&i,.&&& 

William W. Guild 

Assistant 

,
16460

#### Hawai'i State Asbestos Cases, In re

April 9, 1997

Order No. 97-35

Affirmed
VS Approved EIA Test Forms

Rory O. Carolan, DVM

Equine Health, Strategy and Policy

Veterinary Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture

301.851.3558 

In the fall of 2019 VSG 15201.1 required approved EIA labs to accept only those requests submitted on a 

VS approved EIA test form. The following is a list of VS Approved EIA Test Forms, as of JULY 2021: 

USDA

VS 10-11 version DEC 2020 (paper form)

VS 10-11 version FEB 2018 (paper form) 

 Versions earlier than VS 10-11 FEB 2018 should not be used or accepted; discard them. 

VSPS’ electronic form represents VS 10-11 version DEC 2020

Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Wild Horse and Burro Program

Multi-animal form for the exclusive use of DoI, BLM (version SEP 2020)

State Forms

OH Department of Agriculture (paper form, version FEB 2020)

CO USALIMS (electronic form, MAR 2020)

PA USALIMS (electronic form, version MAY 2020)

OR OVIS (electronic form, APR 2020)

WA OVIS (electronic form, APR 2020)

Commercial Forms

GVL Global Vet Link (electronic form, APR 2020)

Larch Hill LLC (electronic form, MAR 2020)

myVETTECH (electronic form, APR 2021)

VETSENTRY (electronic form, version MAY 2021)

https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth-eia 

rory.o.carolan@usda.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 923 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 923

      Supporting the goals and ideals of American Education Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2016

    Mr. Joyce (for himself and Mr. Takano) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Supporting the goals and ideals of American Education Week.

Whereas November 14 through November 18, 2016, marks the 95th annual observance 
        of American Education Week;
Whereas public schools are the backbone of the Nation's democracy, providing 
        young people with the tools they need to maintain the Nation's precious 
        values of freedom, civility, and equality;
Whereas, by equipping young people in the United States with both practical 
        skills and broader intellectual abilities, public schools give them hope 
        for, and access to, a productive future;
Whereas people working in the field of public education, be they teachers, 
        higher education faculty and staff, paraeducators, custodians, 
        substitute educators, bus drivers, clerical workers, food service 
        professionals, workers in skilled trades, health and student service 
        workers, security guards, technical employees, or librarians, work 
        tirelessly to serve children and communities throughout the Nation with 
        care and professionalism; and
Whereas public schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults, 
        children, educators, volunteers, business leaders, and elected officials 
        in a common enterprise: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of American Education 
        Week; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        American Education Week by reflecting on the positive impact of 
        all those who work together to educate children.
                                 <all>
```
DETENGA LAS PLAGAS HAMBRIENTAS.

VISITE

Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección de Salud de Animales y Plantas
#### Logan COTTINGHAM, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12415.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 2, 1957.

*624' J. C. Cornett, Pawhuska, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. 'Gen., County Attorney, Pawhuska County, for defendant in error.

NIX, Judge.

Logan Cottingham was charged by information in the District Court of Osage County with the crime of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor after having been previously convicted of the same offense.

He ■ was represented by counsel and entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to the Oklahoma State Penitentiary for a period of one year and a fine of $1.

The record reflects that the petition in error was filed in this court on the 1st day of November, 1956. No briefs were filed, and no one appeared when said cause was set for oral argument.

In compliance with the holding of this court, the record has been thoroughly examined and no errors of a fundamental or material nature are apparent, therefore, the judgment and sentence of the lower court is affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.