alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019044EN.01007301.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/73

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission

(Case T-419/18 R)

((Interim proceedings - Competition - Euro Interbank Offered Rates (Euribor) - Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD) - Rejection of the request for confidential treatment of certain information contained in a decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Application for interim measures - No prima facie case))

(2019/C 44/96)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Crédit agricole (Montrouge, France), Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (Montrouge) (represented by: J.-P. Tran Thiet, J. Jourdan, J.-J. Lemonnier, lawyers, and M. Powell, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin, M. Farley and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking, first, a suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2018) 2743 final of 27 April 2018 concerning objections submitted by Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to the disclosure of information by way of publication, in accordance with Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)) and, secondly, an order that the Commission refrain from publishing a version of its Decision C(2016) 8530 final of 7 December 2016 relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement [on the European Economic Area (EEA)] (Case AT.39914 — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)) containing elements which are allegedly confidential.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 740 

Congratulating Dr. and Mrs. David and Valerie Hodge on a successful 10- 

year tenure as President of Miami University. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2016 

Mr. LATTA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Dr. and Mrs. David and Valerie Hodge on 

a successful 10-year tenure as President of Miami University. 

Whereas through President Hodge’s leadership Miami University advanced its reputation for an exceptionally 

strong commitment to undergraduate teaching, being 

ranked by U.S. News and World Report as the No. 1 or 

No. 2 public university in this category over the past 6 

years; 

Whereas Miami University has welcomed evermore accomplished incoming students from a wider and more diverse 

pool of prospective students while greatly expanding the 

role of career services to better prepare and create more 

opportunities for its graduates; 

Whereas under the guidance of the President, Miami has 

launched major curricular changes that emphasize experiVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:13 May 19, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR740.IH HR740

sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 740 IH 

ential, active learning with an emphasis on undergraduate research and study abroad; 

Whereas President Hodge embraced a new role for Miami 

Regionals in providing baccalaureate degrees appropriate 

for students and the region; 

Whereas President Hodge led the creation of the Miami Access Initiative, in order to make Miami an affordable 

offer for all Ohioans; 

Whereas President Hodge opened the first centralized geothermal facility improving campus sustainability and reducing Miami’s carbon footprint; 

Whereas President Hodge opened the new Farmer School of 

Business, the Engineering complex, and the Voice of 

America Learning Center while completely remodeling 

Presser, Kreger and Shideler Halls to provide first-class 

facilities to accommodate active student learning; 

Whereas President Hodge is responsible for enriching student 

life dramatically with the dedication of the Armstrong 

Student Center and the renovation and construction of a 

number of residence halls; and 

Whereas President Hodge emphasized creative innovation to 

significantly improve operations and reduce costs, including a campus-wide 25-percent reduction in energy use per 

square foot, leading to Miami being named the most efficient university in the Nation for producing high quality 

results: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Dr. and Mrs. David and Val3 erie Hodge for their successful tenure leading Miami 

4 University over the last decade; and 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 740 IH 

1 (2) recognizes that Dr. and Mrs. David and 

2 Valerie Hodge leave behind a significant legacy of 

3 success that have benefitted the lives of countless 

4 students, and positioned Miami as a premier Ohio 

5 institution of higher education. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.9


AMENDMENT TO THE 
ASHLAND INC. NONQUALIFIED EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN


WHEREAS, Valvoline LLC (“Valvoline”) sponsors for the benefit of certain of its employees the Ashland Inc. Nonqualified Excess Benefit Plan (the “Excess Plan”); and


WHEREAS, Valvoline desires to cease future benefit accrual under the terms of the Excess Plan effective as of September 30, 2016 (the “Effective Date”);


NOW, THEREFORE, the Excess Plan shall be amended as follows:


I.        Section 3(v) shall be added to the Plan to read as follows:


(v)        Plan Benefit Freeze. The benefit accrual of a Participant shall cease as of September 30, 2016 and no service or compensation of a Participant following that date shall result in any additional benefit due under this Plan. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 3(v), any early retirement benefits and subsidization reduction factors to all Participants providing services as of September 30, 2016 shall be provided if the Participant attains age 55 prior to retirement. In addition, any “Rule of 80” requirement to receive an early retirement or subsidized benefit shall be applied by including all service with both Ashland Inc. and Valvoline LLC for Participants for so long as Ashland Inc. (or any entity within the controlled group of Ashland Inc. determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code) remains in the same controlled group, as determined within Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code, of Valvoline LLC. Upon the cessation of Ashland Inc. and Valvoline LLC to be within the same controlled group, determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code, only service with Valvoline LLC (or any entity within its controlled group determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code) shall be included in determining satisfaction of the “Rule of 80.” For the purpose of determining whether a Participant separates from service, so long as a Participant remains a service provider (within the terms of Code section 409A) for Valvoline LLC or Ashland LLC (or any entity within the controlled group of such entity determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Code), the Participant shall not be deemed to have incurred a separation from service.


II.    In all other respect the Plan shall remain unchanged.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Plan has been is executed this 30th day of September, 2016, to be effective as of the date indicated above.




                        	
		
	By:
	/s/ Peter J. Ganz

	 
	Peter J. Ganz 

	 
	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

	 
	Secretary
SERVED: MARCH 26, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

M.T.I. TRAVEL, INC. 

DOCKET NO. F AA-20 14-0110 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S0950011) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

F ede al Aviation Administration 

800 ndependence Avenue, S.W. 

Was ington, DC 20591 

Atte tion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Dav'd P. Affinito, Respondent's Counsel 

Dell Italia, Affinito & Santola 

18 ny Galento Plaza 

ge, NJ 07050 

973-672-8000 

: 973-672-8215 

ONE COPY 

Mic ael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel 

Sen' or Attorney, Office ofthe Chief Counsel 

Fed ral Aviation Administration 

800 ndependence Avenue, S.W. 

Wa hington, DC 20591 

TE 202-267-7100 

F : 202-267-5106 

Ho . J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S Department of Transportation 

120 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Wa hington, DC 20590 

TE 202-366-6941 

F : 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0110 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

A vi tion Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 0591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 21.  Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries.  All others listed are
either direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Bank.

     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY          STATE OF INCORPORATION
     ---------------------------          ---------------------- 

Mid America Federal Savings Bank          Illinois
MAF Developments, Inc.                    Illinois
 
     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE BANK
     ------------------------
 
Mid America Development Services, Inc.    Illinois
Mid America Insurance Agency, Inc.        Illinois
Mid America Finance Corporation           Illinois
Mid America Mortgage Securities, Inc.     Illinois
N.W. Acceptance Corporation               Delaware
N.W. Financial Corporation                Illinois
Route 22 Development Corporation          Illinois
Ambria Development Corporation            Illinois
Randall Road Development Corporation      Illinois
Reigate Woods Development Corporation     Illinois
99 P.3d 1068

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

September 23, 2004

24623

#### Smith v. City and County of Honolulu, Dept. of Human Resources

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DEC. 31, 1996 AND THE AUDITED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (457)
<INVENTORY>                                        620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,590
<PP&E>                                          46,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,666
<SALES>                                         18,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,458
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.72)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December
31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                       337
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,988
<PP&E>                                          49,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,831
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,350
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   370
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,151
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
# All in one

# Reference

# Available Fields
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

543 

CAF 14-00328 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN D. VANSKIVER, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MALLORY J. CLANCY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

SAMANTHA PETERS SMITH, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CANISTEO.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Gerard

J. Alonzo, Jr., J.H.O.), entered January 29, 2014 in a proceeding

pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted petitioner

sole legal custody and primary physical placement of the parties’

child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order modifying a prior custody

order by, inter alia, awarding sole legal custody and primary physical

placement of the parties’ child to petitioner father, respondent

mother contends that she was denied effective assistance of counsel. 

“[W]e note at the outset that, ‘because the potential consequences are

so drastic, the Family Court Act affords protections equivalent to the

constitutional standard of effective assistance of counsel afforded

defendants in criminal proceedings’ ” (Matter of Brown v Gandy, 125

AD3d 1389, 1390). We nevertheless reject the mother’s contention

inasmuch as she did not “ ‘demonstrate the absence of strategy or

other legitimate explanations’ for counsel’s alleged shortcomings”

(People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712; see Matter of Reinhardt v

Hardison, 122 AD3d 1448, 1449).

Contrary to the mother’s further contention, Family Court did not

abuse its discretion in denying her attorney’s request for an

adjournment and in holding the hearing in her absence (see Matter of

O’Leary v Frangomihalos, 89 AD3d 948, 949; see generally Matter of

Steven B., 6 NY3d 888, 889). The mother was aware of the hearing

date, and her attorney’s “vague claim that [she] was unable to attend

the hearing due to [winter weather conditions] was unsupported by any

detailed explanation or evidence from the [mother]” (Matter of 
-2- 543 

CAF 14-00328 

Braswell v Braswell, 80 AD3d 827, 829; see O’Leary, 89 AD3d at 949). 

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 782 

Encouraging the people of the United States to honor the service of military 

retirees who continue to serve the United States long after such retirees 

have completed military service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2016 

Ms. STEFANIK (for herself and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging the people of the United States to honor the 

service of military retirees who continue to serve the 

United States long after such retirees have completed 

military service. 

Whereas there are 2,100,000 retirees of the Armed Forces of 

the United States who have earned their retirement 

through career service or service-connected disability; 

Whereas military retirees are dedicated, focused, well-trained, 

well-disciplined, and well-educated and bring the best 

qualities of United States citizenship to lifelong service 

within the United States and their local communities as 

stable, responsible, citizens, and neighbors; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 782 IH 

Whereas those qualities often result in contributions to the civilian workforce as experienced and dedicated employees, 

to local educational institutions as teachers, counselors, 

and coaches, to local government as elected public servants, and to communities as effective volunteer leaders; 

Whereas such dedication and focus brings balance and stability to local communities; and 

Whereas those contributions are the manifestation of the desire of military retirees to continue lifelong service to the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages the people of the United States to honor the past 

3 and continued service of military retirees to their commu4 nities and the United States long after such retirees have 

5 completed military service by supporting the goals and 

6 ideals of a ‘‘Military Retiree Appreciation Day’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Rabanes

16017

10/21/94

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.24
 ZIX CORPORATION
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
(CEO & Direct Reports)
    Definitions
 Acceleration Event
 Acquiring Person
 1




---



##### 



Affiliate and Associate
 Change in Control
       2




---



##### 



Continuing Director .
 Disability
 Exchange Act
 Resignation.
 Retirement
 Term of Option
 Exercise of Option .
 Exercise
 Adjustment
 3




---



##### 



Method of Exercise
    Termination of Option
  4




---



##### 



nolo contendere
  No Rights as Shareholder .
 State and Federal Securities Regulation .
 5




---



##### 



Modification of Options .
 Withholding of Taxes .
 Continued Employment Not Presumed .
 Non-Competition Covenants .
  6




---



##### 



either either
     7




---



##### 



Option Issued Pursuant to Plan
 No Liability of Option .
 No Assignment .
 Governing Law .
 Entire Agreement .
 Notice .
 8




---



##### 



ZIX CORPORATIONDate:  1-9-2009
    By:
    /s/ Susan K. ConnerSusan K. ConnerChief Financial Officer 9




---



##### 



Zix Corporation (TX)
    
    Signature Page2711
N. Haskell Avenue
Suite 2200
    
    Sign and return to the legal departmentDallas, Texas 75204United States
  Effective Date of Grant:
    
    December 23,2008Name of Optionee:
    
    Spurr, RickNumber of Shares:
    
    100,000.00Exercise Price:
    
    $1.11Plan Name:
    
    2004 Stock Option PlanExpiration Date:
    
    December 22, 2018Issuance Type:
    
    OPT
 Number of Shares:
    
    
    Vest Date:8,333.00
    
    
    March 23, 20098,334.00
    
    
    June 23, 20098,333.00
    
    
    September 23, 20098,333.00
    
    

December 23, 20098,334.00
    
    
    March 23, 20108,333.00
    
    
    June 23, 20108,333.00
    
    
    September 23, 20108,334.00
    
    
    December 23,20108,333.00
    
    
    March 23, 20118,333.00
    
    
    June 23, 20118,334.00
    
    
    September 23, 20118,333.00
    
    
    December 23, 2011
 /s/ Richard D. Spurr
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    01/20/09Optionee Signature
 01/11/2009 10:34 PM
    
    Equity Enterprise 2007.1.3.600
    
    Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                              EASTON BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999

<S>                                                    <C>
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $   44,428
                                                       ==========

Average shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . .     560,318
Basic earnings per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $     0.08
                                                       ==========

Average shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . .     560,318
Dilutive average shares outstanding under
 warrants and options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     207,800
Exercise price. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $    10.00
Assumed proceeds on exercise. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $2,078,000
Average market value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $    12.50
Less:  Treasury stock purchased with assumed proceeds
 from exercise of warrants and options. . . . . . . .     166,240
Adjusted average shares - diluted . . . . . . . . . .     601,878
Diluted earnings per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $     0.07
                                                       ==========
</TABLE>

     The stock of the Company is not traded on any public exchange.  The average
market  value  is  derived  from  trades known to management.  Private sales may
occur  where  management  of  the  Company  is  unaware  of  the  sales  price.

<PAGE>
### 02-12-00530-CR COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/16/2015 2:39:31 PM Accepted 3/16/2015 2:46:47 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK