MEMORANDUM 

TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record 

FROM: Elizabeth Gentile, ERG 

Deb Bartram, ERG 

DATE: September 30, 2015 

SUBJECT: Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database – Development, Content, 

and Use 

ERG is providing technical support to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of 

Water, Engineering and Analysis Division (EAD) for development of effluent limitations 

guidelines and standards (ELGs) for the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry. In 2010, 

EPA distributed a survey to steam electric power plants to collect technical, economic, and 

financial information related to wastewater generation and treatment under the authority of 

Section 308 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The Agency is used data from the surveys to 

support the development of the proposed and final rule. 

 

This memorandum provides more information about the development, content, and use of the 

Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database, including: 

 Information Collection Request (ICR) development; 

 Survey delivery and receipt; 

 Survey helpline support; 

 Technical survey review; 

 Data extraction; and 

 Final Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database. 

1.0 INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST (ICR) DEVELOPMENT

In support of the rulemaking, EPA developed and distributed a survey to the steam electric 

power generating industry under the authority of Section 308 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 

U.S.C. 1318. EPA designed the survey to obtain technical information related to wastewater 

generation and treatment, and economic information such as costs of wastewater treatment 

technologies and financial characteristics of affected companies. 

EPA developed an ICR entitled Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent 

Guidelines (Steam Electric Survey). The survey was approved by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) in May 2010 (OMB Control No. 2040-0281). 

The survey comprised the following nine parts: 

Part A: Steam Electric Power Plant Operations 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 2 

Part B: FGD Systems 

Part C: Ash Handling 

Part D: Pond/Impoundment Systems and Other Wastewater Treatment Operations 

Part E: Wastes from Cleaning Metal Process Equipment 

Part F: Management Practices for Ponds/Impoundments and Landfills 

Part G: Leachate Sampling Data for Ponds/Impoundments and Landfills 

Part H: Nuclear Power Generation 

Part I: Economic and Financial Data 

In order to identify the population of plants that would be candidates to receive the survey, EPA 

created a sample frame consisting of all operating fossil- and nuclear-fueled steam electric power 

plants in the United States that reported operating under NAICS code 22, and their 

corresponding generating units, as determined using information obtained from databases that 

are maintained by the Energy Information Administration, a statistical agency of the U.S. 

Department of Energy (DOE). The Energy Information Administration collects information on 

existing electric generating plants and associated equipment to evaluate the current status and 

potential trends in the industry. The source of the information came primarily from the 2007 

Electric Generator Report (Form EIA-860) and was supplemented by information collected by 

Form EIA-923 and a survey conducted by EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency 

Response (OSWER) [DCN SE02032]. In addition, EPA identified two plants that started 

operations after 2007 and obtained information about them from Internet searches. Collectively, 

the data sources provided key sample frame information for each steam electric power plant with 

a NAICS code of 22. EPA used this sample frame to select a total of 733 steam electric power 

plants to receive the survey. 

To minimize the burden on the respondents, EPA grouped plants into strata based on fuel 

classification1

 so that an efficient stratified sampling scheme could be used. For more 

information on EPA’s methodology for assigning plant-level fuel classification, see Part B of the 

Supporting Statement for the Draft Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating 

Effluent Guidelines Information Collection Request [SE00205A01]. EPA then developed four 

different versions of the survey (e.g., combinations of survey parts) to gather specific 

information from the different strata. Table 1-1 presents the four different versions of the survey, 

the targeted plant fuel type for those versions, the survey parts associated with the survey 

version, and the number of survey recipients for each version. 

 

1

 EPA classified plants into the fuel categories to develop the sample frame of all fossil- and nuclear-fueled steam 

electric power plants in the United States. EPA further developed plant-level fuel classifications based on a 

hierarchy of the type of units operating at the plant; therefore, some plants may operate units that burn other types of 

fuel in addition to the fuel under which they are classified. Plants that operated coal- or petroleum coke-fired units 

were classified as coal or petroleum coke regardless of other fuels at the plant. For example, a plant classified as 

coal will have coal-fired unit(s) at the plant, but may also have oil- fired, gas-fired, or nuclear unit(s). 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 3 

Table 1-1. Steam Electric Survey Versions 

Version Targeted Plant Fuel Type Survey Parts Received 

Number of Steam 

Electric Plants 

Receiving Survey 

1 Coal- and Petroleum Coke-Fired All Parts 97 

2 Coal- and Petroleum Coke-Fired A, B, C, D, H, I 407 

3 Oil-Fired and Combinationa Fuel Types A, B, C, D, E, H, I 42 

4 Gas- and Nuclear-Fueled A, E, H, I 187 

Total 733 

a – Combination plants operate at least two generating units that use different types of fuel, but do not operate units 

fueled by coal or petroleum coke. 

EPA evaluated several different survey formats as candidates for collecting the technical, 

financial, and economic information from the steam electric industry. These formats included 

MS Word, MS Excel, and PDF. EPA ultimately determined that the MS Excel format was the 

most appropriate format for distributing and collecting the requested data from industry and 

subsequently transferring the data to a database for analysis. See DCN SE00402, or EPA’s 

website (http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam-electric/questionnaire.cfm), for the 

final version of the Steam Electric Survey. 

Based on the information requested in the survey, EPA developed database table structures to 

electronically store the data received from each plant. EPA developed the table structures (and 

corresponding field names) to match the data requested in the electronic survey by 

question/section number and by specific topic. During development of the electronic survey 

format, EPA mapped the specific response fields in the MS Excel survey parts to the database 

table and field name where the data would ultimately be stored. EPA then developed a program 

that automatically opened MS Excel plant response files and extracted the mapped responses into 

the database tables in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database (technical database). 

For more information on the extraction program for the technical database, see Section 5.0 of 

this memorandum. 

In order to navigate the final version of the technical database, EPA developed a database 

dictionary that cross references the Steam Electric Survey (Survey Parts A through H) with the 

technical database2

. The data dictionary includes three different sorts to sort information linking 

the survey questions to the database tables (by part, section, question number, or question table 

number) or the database tables to the survey questions (by database table name or field name). 

See DCN SE05924.A1 for the complete data dictionary. 

EPA used the plant names and addresses reported in the 2007 EIA database to develop the 

mailing list for the Steam Electric Survey. Further, the Utility Water Act Group (UWAG) 

reviewed the mailing list to provide feedback on the names and addresses being used. For a final 

copy of the mailing list, including the survey version assigned to each plant, see DCN SE00510 

or EPA’s website: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam-electric/questionnaire.cfm. 

EPA prepared a disk for each plant containing all MS Excel electronic files corresponding to 

each plant’s specific version of the survey. Additionally, the disks included PDF versions of the 

 

2

 See DCN SE03302 for the survey database containing economic and financial information (Survey Part I). 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 4 

survey to be used as a working file. All files were also available for download from EPA’s 

website. 

For more information on the development of the survey, survey form, and mailing list, see 

Section 3.2 of the Technical Development Document for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and 

Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (TDD) [DCN 

SE05904]. 

2.0 SURVEY DELIVERY AND RECEIPT

EPA’s contractor, Eastern Research Group (ERG), developed a survey tracking database to track 

the mail out, delivery, and confirmation of receipt for all 733 surveys. In order to track and 

identify plants, ERG generated 5-digit plant IDs for all 733 plants using a random number 

generator. ERG included the following information in the survey tracking database for all 733 

survey recipients: 

 Version of the survey delivered to the plant; 

 FedEx tracking number; 

 Date, time, and recipient of the survey (available via FedEx shipping 

information); 

 Original due date for the specific plant and extension request information; and 

 Date EPA received the survey response from the plant. 

EPA received 733 completed surveys, including those from 53 plants that certified that they were 

not and did not have the capability to be engaged in steam electric power generation, would be 

retired by December 31, 2011,3 or did not generate electricity in 2009 by burning any fossil or 

nuclear fuels. EPA refers to these 53 plants as “kick outs” as they did not complete the remainder 

of the survey based on the instructions in Part A of the survey. See Appendix A, Table A-1, for a 

complete listing of the 733 plants and the date(s) EPA received the returned survey4. Because 

responses were received for all 733 sampled plants (including those 53 plants that were not 

required to complete the remainder of the survey), there were no plants that were considered 

non-respondents, thus the response rate is 100 percent. 

After receiving a survey response, ERG updated the survey tracking table, uploaded the survey 

response to a secure confidential business information (CBI) server, and performed a 

completeness check on the returned survey. All survey responses were managed as CBI in the 

expectation that some CBI would be claimed by respondents. ERG created working folders, 

named by Plant ID, of all 733 survey responses on the secured CBI network. The survey 

response files saved in these working folders included the specific MS Excel survey parts, 

diagrams, reports, and any other electronic files the plant submitted with the survey. 

 

3

 At the time EPA developed the survey, EPA used 2011 as the cutoff year for retirements because the plants would 

be retired before the proposed rule was published. 

4

 Part G of the Steam Electric Survey included a request for sampling data. Because of the nature of the requested 

data, plants responding to Part G had more time to complete the part. Therefore, a date for Parts A-F and H and a 

date for Part G response are included in the tracking table. 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 5 

ERG stored all hard copy submittals and original survey response disks in a locked archive to 

maintain the original survey responses from all plants. In addition to the electronic working 

folders for each plant, ERG also created a hard copy log to track all hard copy files submitted by 

plants with the survey (e.g., certification statement, maps, diagrams, reports). The hard copy log 

tracks the plant identification information, the name of the ERG personnel that received the 

survey, and the physical location of the hard copy files associated with each plant. 

ERG performed completeness checks on all 733 surveys as they were received and uploaded to 

the designated network location. Along with the survey files and hard copy logs, EPA saved the 

completeness checklists for each survey in the working folder. The completeness checklists 

tracked the following pieces of information: 

 ERG personnel checking completeness; 

 Plant ID; 

 Survey version number; 

 Date the package was delivered to ERG; 

 Check for the completed certification statement; 

 Check that all applicable MS Excel survey parts were present and readable; 

 Check that all plant working folder was created and all electronic files were 

copied to the secure network; 

 Flag for plants that “kicked out” of the survey; and 

 Flag to determine that the survey was ready for technical review. 

Table A-1, in Appendix A of this memorandum, lists all 733 survey recipients and shows that 

ERG performed a completeness check for all survey responses. 

3.0 SURVEY HELPLINE SUPPORT

During survey response, ERG dedicated a telephone and email helpline to provide assistance to 

survey recipients with questions regarding the instructions, standard terminology, procedures for 

completing the survey, and technical content. EPA and ERG developed guidelines for operating 

the helpline and logged all voice messages and emails received throughout survey response. 

ERG also tracked and summarized all responses provided via the helpline in the helpline log 

[DCN SE02972; SE02973]. This log tracked the following types of information: 

 Helpline personnel responding to the request; 

 Date and time of request; 

 Plant contact name and phone number, plant name(s) and ID(s), and company 

name; 

 Survey version(s); 

 Description of the question(s); 

 Date and time of response to the plant contact; and 

 Summary of helpline staff responses. 

 

As ERG provided technical support via the helpline, the helpline log was used to generate a list 

of frequently asked questions (FAQs) that was uploaded on EPA’s website during survey 

response. The FAQs were divided into the following sections: technical content (provided by 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 6 

survey part and question number), general questions on the survey, and applicability. EPA 

continued to update the list of FAQs, publicly available on EPA’s website, as more questions 

were received via the helpline. See DCN SE00918 for EPA’s final version of the survey FAQs. 

Additionally through the helpline, EPA identified and revised MS Excel survey files (“modified 

files”) for 12 individual plant respondents to customize their survey files to accommodate the 

need for more space for some technical information (i.e., number of surface impoundments or 

cooling water systems). 

4.0 TECHNICAL SURVEY REVIEW 

Following receipt of the technical surveys, EPA directed ERG to perform a technical review of 

the responses. ERG created a survey review checklist to track the specific checks completed for 

each survey. This checklist included electronic checks, reasonableness checks, and checks for 

technical content. 

4.1 Electronic Checks

ERG performed electronic checks for all 733 survey response files to ensure that all data could 

be successfully extracted into the technical database. These electronic checks included the 

following: 

 Confirming that original and copied tab names were named correctly; 

 Clearing radio button responses as instructed by plants in the survey part 

comments5

; 

 Identifying true zero responses (“0”) and replacing those responses with the code 

“-555”; 

 Identifying missing data6

 and replacing those fields with the code “-111”; and 

 Performing a check on modified files (referenced in Section 3.0) to confirm that 

all fields and electronic mapping were correct after the modifications. 

4.2 Reasonableness and Technical Checks for Version 3 and 4 Survey Responses

ERG completed reasonableness and technical content checks for different sections of the survey 

based on the plant fuel type to prioritize the review of information received. Some examples of 

these reasonable and technical checks included: 

 Confirming that any plants that “kicked out” of the survey, as described in Section 

2.0, truly are kick outs and did not need to provide responses to the remaining 

survey parts; 

 Confirming that responses to questions in different survey parts corresponded to 

the responses provided in other survey parts (for example, the number of 

 

5

 The Steam Electric Survey contained several questions that had radio button response fields. Once a radio button 

was selected, the plants were unable to remove their response. In cases where the radio button was mistakenly 

selected, respondents used the comment fields to notify EPA that the radio button should be left blank. 

6

 In order to track missing data in the database, ERG used the code “-111” to identify those responses that were left 

blank, but should have been completed based on other responses in the survey. 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 7 

ponds/impoundments reported in Part A matched the number of 

ponds/impoundments reported in Part D); 

 Based on survey responses in Part A (general technical information and system 

operations), checking that the plant reported all requested data in other parts of the 

survey; and 

 Confirming that responses for amounts, such as BTU generated by fuel type, were 

correct given the specified units in the survey. 

For all Version 3 and 4 plants (non coal- or petroleum coke-fired plants), ERG performed the 

completeness and electronic checks described above. After these checks, all of the survey 

responses were extracted into the technical database. For more information on the extraction of 

the data, see Section 5.0 of this memorandum. After extraction, ERG developed specific checks 

to analyze reasonableness and completeness for the Version 3 and 4 surveys using queries on the 

extracted data set. The specific reasonableness and technical checks for the Version 3 and 4 

surveys included: 

 Confirming that all kick out responses were accurate; 

 Confirming that all Version 3 and 4 plants only reported steam electric generating 

units burning fuel other than coal and/or petroleum coke; and 

 Correctly identifying gas powered combined cycle units and making the 

appropriate corrections to the data to accurately represent the industry. 

4.3 Reasonableness and Technical Checks for Version 1 and 2 Survey Responses

ERG performed the same completeness and electronic checks on the Version 1 and 2 survey 

responses as were completed for the Version 3 and 4 survey responses. However, because EPA’s 

proposed rulemaking focuses to a large degree on waste streams generated at coal- and 

petroleum coke-fired plants, particularly FGD wastewater, ash transport water, and combustion 

residual landfill leachate, EPA directed ERG to perform additional technical review checks and 

follow-up contacts for the Version 1 and 2 survey responses (i.e., coal- and petroleum coke-fired 

plants). ERG worked with EPA to develop a standard review of these survey responses, 

completed for all Version 1 and 2 surveys, and a detailed review completed in addition to the 

standard review for a subset of the Version 1 and 2 surveys. 

Version 1/2 Standard Review

The “Version 1/2 Standard Review” focused on the technical responses provided for wet FGD 

scrubber data and treatment (Part B, Sections 1, 4, 5, and 7), wet fly ash handling (Part C, 

Sections 2.1 through 2.5), wet bottom ash handling (Part C, Sections 3.1 through 3.5), and 

wastewater treatment/impoundment systems (Part D, Sections 3.1 and 3.2). As part of the 

standard review, ERG identified missing data, developed a list of follow-up questions, and 

delivered these questions to the designated plant technical contact via telephone or e-mail. As 

plant responses were received, ERG updated the plant-level survey responses located in the plant 

working folders. ERG reviewed 191 Version 1 and 2 surveys using this approach. ERG senior 

personnel performed second-level reviews on over 85 percent of the 191 survey responses to 

confirm that all surveys were being reviewed appropriately. These second-level reviews included 

a review of the data reported in the survey and also all of the proposed changes identified by the 

first reviewer. 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 8 

Version 1/2 Detailed Review

In addition to the standard review described above, ERG performed more detailed reviews on 

313 Version 1 and 2 surveys (including 27 “kick out” responses). This review, referred to as 

“Version 1/2 Detailed Review”, reviewed the entire Steam Electric Survey for completeness, 

reasonableness, and technical content, compared to specific items listed as part of the standard 

review. As part of the detailed review, ERG performed follow-up calls and e-mails to obtain 

missing data or confirm specific data elements. As plant responses were received, ERG updated 

the plant-level survey responses located in the plant working folders. The Version 1 and 2 

responses that received this more detailed review were selected based on the type of treatment 

systems operating at the plant (identified from previous site visits) or they were randomly 

selected. Similar to the other Version 1 and 2 reviews, ERG senior personnel performed secondlevel reviews on 50 percent of these survey responses to confirm that surveys were being 

reviewed appropriately. 

4.4 Summary of Technical Survey Review

Table A-1, in Appendix A, presents the complete listing of all 733 plants and the specific level of 

review completed for each survey. In addition to the checks described previously in Sections 4.1 

to 4.3, ERG also used the technical review checklists to track all changes made to the survey, 

including changes to the electronic formatting and technical content. This change form tracked 

the specific data field that changed, the date the change was made, the ERG personnel making 

the change, and the source/reason for the change. Because some survey responses went through 

two levels of review, ERG also used this form for first reviewers to identify all potential changes 

and get them approved prior to making the actual changes in the survey. The survey review 

checklists for each respondent also included tabs for follow-up questions for the plant and a 

place to track discussions with the plant via phone. ERG saved all e-mail correspondence with 

the plants in the plant-specific working folders. See Appendix E of ERG’s “Quality Assurance 

Project Plan for the Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines Rulemaking” for more information on the 

technical review checklist [DCN SE02951]. 

All changes made to the survey responses as a result of these electronic and technical reviews are 

reflected in the final technical database that EPA used to conduct industry analyses. See Section 

6.0 for more information. 

5.0 DATA EXTRACTION

Following technical review of the survey responses, ERG extracted the plant-specific working 

folder survey data into the technical database. ERG electronically transferred the data using a 

Visual Basic (VBA) program that automatically opened each survey response file and transferred 

the responses to the technical database using the mapped responses described previously in 

Section 1.0. For more information on the VBA extraction program, see EPA’s memorandum 

“Steam Electric Questionnaire Extraction Methodology and Program Code” [DCN SE03832]. 

The program identified surveys for extraction from a table titled “Survey Review” in the survey 

tracking database (see Section 2.0). The survey review table consisted of a record for each plant 

and a corresponding flag “Ready for Extraction.” After surveys were reviewed and determined to 

be ready for transfer in the database, ERG reviewers flagged the survey “Ready for Extraction.” 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 9 

In order to successfully extract the different data types reported in the survey responses, ERG 

had to assign database fields certain field types (e.g., text, number, date) and corresponding field 

lengths to match the data in the survey. The different database field types in the technical 

database include: 

 Number (Double – decimals); 

 Number (Long Integer – no decimals); 

 Yes/No (Check boxes); 

 Text (Length up to 255 characters); 

 Memo (Length longer than 255 characters); and 

 Date/Time. 

 

As ERG developed the approach to map reported data to specific database tables, ERG also 

identified key fields for each database table based on the level of data captured in the table (i.e., 

plant-level, unit-level, pond-level). The extraction program used the key fields to distinguish 

between unique records of data. Because the broadest level of data in the technical database is at 

the plant level, one global key field for all tables in the database is the Plant ID. As the level of 

data reported is more specific, the key fields associated with a database table include those that 

are unique identifiers. For example, the plant contact information is provided at the plant level; 

therefore, the key field for that database table is the Plant ID. The types of fuel burned at the 

plant is requested at the steam electric generating unit level; therefore, the key fields for that 

database table are the Plant ID and the steam electric generating unit ID. These key fields allow 

for querying the database, and pulling data from different database tables at the same level (e.g., 

steam electric generating unit level). 

Because of the different data types included in the technical database and the default values for 

blank responses extracted into the database, ERG developed a system of codes that were used to 

designate different types of responses. Some of these codes were programmed in to the VBA 

extraction program, while others were added during technical survey review as explained in 

Section 4.0. Table 5-1 provides a list of codes used in the technical database, along with a 

description of what they represent. 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 10 

Table 5-1. Description of Technical Database Codes 

Database Code Description 

Codes Used in the VBA Extraction Program 

-999 Data designated as blank 

-777a Data that was text entered into a numeric field and unable to be transferred to the database 

Codes from Technical Survey Review 

-555 Represents a true zero response 

-111 Represents missing data 

Codes Associated with Database Field Types 

-1 Corresponds to a “Yes” or “True” answer 

Codes Associated with Sanitized CBI Database Fieldsb, c

-9999 Represents redacted CBI data in a numeric field 

Redacted Represents redacted CBI data in text or memo fields 

a – ERG corrected these errors during survey extraction into the technical database as described below in the 

description of the technical database error log. 

b – See Section 6.0 for more information on EPA’s process for sanitizing the Steam Electric Technical 

Questionnaire Database [DCN SE05903]. 

c – Redacted CBI data in date/time fields are shown as blank. 

In order to check the mapping, and that the program extracted the data to the correct technical 

database location, ERG performed quality checks on all survey parts (A through I) by filling out 

blank survey parts and running test extractions. ERG performed this check for multiple data 

response fields on all tabs within a part. Any errors identified were corrected and another test 

extraction was performed for that specific tab. Extractions were performed until a zero error rate 

was obtained. 

Following distribution of the Steam Electric Survey to survey respondents, ERG identified seven 

mapping references that required updating to accurately transfer survey responses into the steam 

electric technical database. ERG altered the extraction code to account for the updated mapping 

references to correctly extract these data. Table 5-2 provides the survey part, question and table, 

and a description of the update made to the extraction program. 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 11 

Table 5-2. Summary of MS Excel Mapping Updates in the Extraction Program 

Survey Part Question (Table) Description 

Part B Section 5 B5-1 (Table B-7) Updated a drop down menu reference to link to the 

correct cell in the MS Excel file mapping. 

Part C Section 2.5 C2-46 Updated the yes/no radio button to respond “No 

Answer” instead of “Yes.” ERG analyzed responses to 

the remainder of Section 2.5 to update the plant 

response to “Yes”/”No” after extraction. 

Part C Section 3.1 C3-31 (Table C-22) Updated the reference cells in the table to link to the 

correct cell in the MS Excel file mapping. 

Part D Section 3.2 D3-2 (Table D-3); D3-3 (Table 

D-4) 

Updated reference conditional statements to account 

for true zero values (represented as “-555”) and blank 

zero values. 

Part D Section 4.1 D4-11 Updated the reference cells in the table to link to the 

correct cell in the MS Excel file mapping. 

Part D Section 5.1 D5-2 (Table D-11) Updated the reference cells in the table to link to the 

correct cell in the MS Excel file mapping. 

Part I Section 1 I1-1 (Table I-1) Updated the reference cells in the table to link to the 

correct cell in the MS Excel file mapping. 

As described in Section 4.0, ERG performed electronic checks on all 733 surveys prior to 

extraction into the technical database. ERG performed these checks to eliminate errors associated 

with extracting the data into the technical database. In addition to these electronic checks, ERG 

also built in a tool to the extraction program that alerted the user of successful extractions or 

extractions that were incomplete due to an extraction error. If the survey was successfully 

extracted, the program automatically updated the survey review table with a date stamp and 

removed the flag for “Ready for Extraction.” 

If the program encountered an error during the extraction of a particular survey, the program kept 

the “Ready for Extraction” flag and also created a flag in a column titled “Extract Error” for 

applicable records. The program documented the error in a table titled “Error Log.” The error log 

documented the following types of information: 

 Plant ID; 

 Database table name; 

 Database field name; 

 Problem; and 

 The value of the field causing the issue (if applicable). 

Using the information in the error log, ERG was able to locate the issues causing errors in the 

extraction program and develop an approach to fix those errors. The types of errors identified in 

the error log included: 

 Specific survey file cannot be found in the designated file path; 

 Field needs to be memo to accommodate cell entry; 

 Cell entry is longer than field length; 

 The cell contents are text, but the field in numeric; 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 12 

 The excel field name/type and access field name/type do not match; and 

 Error in the mapping references. 

ERG corrected errors associated with the data provided in the survey response files and the field 

types in the database as required during the extraction of all 733 surveys. The majority of the 

errors (excluding database field name/type specifications) were corrected in the MS Excel files 

and re-extracted. However, ERG also encountered errors resulting from text responses in 

numeric fields. These entries included text strings such as “/”, “to”, or “-” to designate averages 

or “See comments” to direct EPA to the plant comments. ERG corrected these fields by 

averaging numeric ranges provided and moving the range to the plant comments section. 

Additionally, ERG inserted the “-111” (represents missing data) code to replace the “See 

comments” entries. The extraction program would still extract the data to the survey; however, 

the program replaced the text with the “-777” (represents text entered into a numeric data field) 

code. ERG fixed these errors either directly in the technical database, and considered to survey 

successfully extracted, or in the MS Excel survey files and re-extracted the survey. 

After the extraction of all 733 surveys, ERG identified “blank” records in database tables that 

resulted from plants filling out a radio button or drop down menu by mistake. ERG identified 

these records, checked the responses against the survey working copies, and deleted those 

records determined to be “blank.” 

6.0 FINAL STEAM ELECTRIC TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE DATABASE

The final technical database is a compilation of the extractable data requested in the 733 surveys 

distributed to the steam electric industry. There are a total of 265 tables in the technical database, 

185 directly corresponding to the data requested in the Steam Electric Survey and 80 created by 

ERG from a number of analyses performed using the survey data. The final database includes 

information claimed by respondents as CBI. ERG has included the CBI database in the CBI 

rulemaking record [DCN SE05903]. Respondents also provided various attachments, including 

process diagrams, maps, reports, and studies, in response to the survey; because these data were 

not able to be extracted into the database, they are included separately in the rulemaking record 

as “supplemental files” submitted by the plant. 

As part of a response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request7

 from Environmental 

Integrity Project, Earthjustice, and Sierra Club, EPA initiated an effort to substantiate Steam 

Electric Survey responses claimed CBI that were used in the development of compliance cost 

and pollutant loadings estimates. Following the receipt and review of the plant responses, EPA 

issued a final confidentiality determination for the requested information from the plants (see 

DCN SE06326). ERG updated the CBI flags in the technical database based on these final 

determinations. 

Additionally, as part of the final confidentiality determination, EPA determined that some or all 

of the information requested in six questions is not entitled to confidential treatment. These six 

questions include A11-2, B4-2, B6-1, D4-3, D5-1, and D6-1. As a result, EPA removed the CBI 

 

7

 For more information on the FOIA request from Environmental Integrity Project, Earthjustice, and Sierra Club, see 

the materials at https://foiaonline.regulations.gov/foia/action/public/home, FOIA Request Tracking Number EPAHQ-2013-008604. 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 

Page 13 

claims for questions A11-2, B4-2, B6-1, D5-1, and D6-1 in the technical database. For question 

D4-3, EPA determined that the portion of the responses that included surface area, current 

volume, and height of the pool was not entitled to confidential business information. Because of 

the format of the technical database, specifically the crosswalk between the designated CBI field 

and corresponding data fields for Question D4-3, ERG did not update the corresponding CBI 

flag. However, any of the determined non-CBI information used in the compliance cost and 

pollutant loadings analyses was treated as non-CBI. 

EPA created a sanitized, that is a non-CBI, version of the technical database (see DCN SE05924) 

and the supplemental files for the public rulemaking record which removes both CBI and CBIdeducible data. CBI-deducible data is that which could be combined with non-CBI information 

or data, such as aggregated values presented in the Technical Development Document (TDD), to 

determine (or back calculate) CBI information. Typically, CBI data can be masked (that is, nondeducible) if it is combined with at least two other CBI data points into an aggregated value. For 

the statistical analysis of the survey responses, EPA has aggregated responses and presented total 

data or statistical results of the data (e.g., average data). Where an aggregated output includes 

totals summed from both CBI and non-CBI data, the CBI responses may be deducible. 

In creating the sanitized version of the technical database, EPA determined what data elements 

would be considered CBI deducible. For those elements, the responses were stripped in their 

entirety from the sanitized version of the database. EPA also stripped all comment responses in 

the technical database to avoid the release of CBI-deducible data. In addition, any supplemental 

files that could contain such CBI-deducible data were removed from the public record. These 

supplemental files included the water balance diagrams, maps that identified pond and treatment 

systems, wastewater treatment diagrams, pond design data, leachate volumes and treatment, and 

groundwater monitoring well diagrams. EPA also removed the tables created from the survey 

responses from the sanitized technical database. 

EPA created a database dictionary for both the CBI and sanitized versions of the technical 

database. The database dictionary for the CBI technical database, DCN SE05903.A1, contains a 

listing of all 265 tables in the CBI technical database and all field names, types, and descriptions 

for each of those tables, including the crosswalk between the database tables and the Steam 

Electric Survey. The database dictionary for the sanitized technical database, DCN SE05924.A1 

(previously described in Section 1.0), contains a listing of all 185 tables in the sanitized technical 

database and the crosswalk between the database tables and the Steam Electric Survey. 
Appendix A: Plant-level Survey, Tracking, and Review Data 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

1 1 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R

14 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R16 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R34 2 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R66 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R70 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R

103 1 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R124 2 6/18/2010 10/5/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R129 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 166 3 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 174 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R189 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R208 4 6/18/2010 9/27/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 210 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R216 2 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R217 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R227 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R249 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R263 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 15 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

265 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R270 2 6/18/2010 10/25/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R273 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R280 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 319 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 333 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R340 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R349 2 6/18/2010 10/8/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R369 2 6/18/2010 10/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R376 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R394 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R424 2 6/18/2010 12/9/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R444 2 6/18/2010 10/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R450 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R451 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 480 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R489 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 493 2 6/21/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R494 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R508 2 6/18/2010 10/4/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R548 1 6/21/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R556 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 16 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

562 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R583 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R635 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R654 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R664 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R686 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 693 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R710 4 6/18/2010 9/3/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 732 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 737 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R742 4 6/18/2010 9/1/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 771 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R817 4 6/18/2010 10/21/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 823 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R860 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 864 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R876 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R904 2 6/18/2010 9/27/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R909 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R916 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 928 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R942 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 17 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

945 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R948 4 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 963 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 973 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 997 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R

1017 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1020 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1053 4 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1061 2 6/18/2010 9/8/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1087 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1092 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1097 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1180 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1185 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1194 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1199 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1206 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1219 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1230 4 6/30/2010 7/23/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1236 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1245 1 6/21/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1258 2 6/18/2010 9/27/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 18 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

1276 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1298 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1324 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1365 1 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1366 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1381 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1402 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1412 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1429 2 6/18/2010 10/4/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1435 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1476 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1493 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1516 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1533 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1534 2 6/18/2010 10/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1542 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1560 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1565 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1572 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1577 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1578 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1595 1 6/21/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 19 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

1625 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1630 4 6/18/2010 9/7/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1634 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1647 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1657 2 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1670 2 6/18/2010 9/3/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1671 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1674 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1695 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1731 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1754 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1761 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1795 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1837 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1900 3 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1909 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R1916 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1923 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1929 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1954 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 1957 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R1962 4 6/18/2010 8/19/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 20 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

1963 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2031 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2033 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2060 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2068 4 6/18/2010 9/30/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2079 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2080 2 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2134 4 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2149 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2152 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2188 2 6/18/2010 10/12/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2197 4 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2198 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2239 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2240 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2244 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2259 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2265 2 6/18/2010 7/6/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2268 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2269 1 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2297 2 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2314 2 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 21 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

2317 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2326 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2334 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2364 2 6/18/2010 9/30/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2383 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2402 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2420 2 6/18/2010 10/19/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2422 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2445 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2465 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2466 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2482 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2485 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2506 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2511 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2512 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2536 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2542 4 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2548 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2550 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2567 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2569 2 6/18/2010 9/24/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 22 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

2601 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2606 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2608 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2610 3 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2612 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2623 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2625 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2654 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2673 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2680 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2691 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2700 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2702 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2711 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2719 4 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2740 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2758 4 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2766 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2776 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2784 2 6/18/2010 10/5/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2803 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2825 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 23 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

2827 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2840 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2851 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2892 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2920 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2944 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R2966 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R2972 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2977 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 2999 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3008 4 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3015 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3018 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3024 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3030 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3056 2 6/18/2010 7/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3077 4 6/18/2010 11/5/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3082 4 6/18/2010 7/26/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3087 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3095 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3097 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3123 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 24 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

3141 4 6/21/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3142 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3146 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3157 1 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3181 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3187 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3191 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3196 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3200 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3217 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3235 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3236 2 6/18/2010 10/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3265 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3274 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3280 3 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3309 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3318 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3369 4 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3373 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3377 3 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3384 4 6/24/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3415 2 6/18/2010 9/30/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 25 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

3433 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3464 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3484 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3497 4 6/18/2010 10/22/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3503 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3552 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3561 2 6/21/2010 9/30/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3567 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3578 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3579 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3585 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3587 4 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3597 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3604 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3605 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3623 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3624 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3625 2 6/18/2010 10/5/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3628 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3642 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3648 2 6/18/2010 10/26/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3649 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 26 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

3672 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3701 4 6/18/2010 7/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3709 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3713 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3719 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3728 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3738 4 6/18/2010 9/28/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3746 3 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3749 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3751 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3786 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3790 4 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3793 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3807 2 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3831 2 6/18/2010 10/12/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3843 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3887 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3917 2 6/18/2010 9/3/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3922 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 3951 1 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3977 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3978 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 27 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

3989 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R3996 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R3997 1 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4006 3 6/18/2010 9/22/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4011 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4017 2 6/21/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4021 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4024 2 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4083 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4122 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4126 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4150 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4161 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4170 2 6/18/2010 10/8/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4211 3 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4230 4 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4237 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4242 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4249 4 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4252 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4257 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4268 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 28 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

4280 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4283 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4285 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 

4315 2 N/A – Plant Closureb 9/17/2010b X Version 1/2 Detailed R

4348 3 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4380 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4384 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4386 4 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4388 2 6/18/2010 10/22/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4391 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4399 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4454 4 6/18/2010 9/24/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4486 2 6/18/2010 7/12/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4488 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4489 4 6/18/2010 8/12/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4495 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4524 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4529 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4533 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4543 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4547 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4552 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 29 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

4557 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4575 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4585 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4591 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4598 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4599 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4617 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4620 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4624 2 9/16/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4637 2 6/18/2010 10/22/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4671 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4676 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4679 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4683 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4690 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4692 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4702 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4703 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4706 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4711 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4734 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4736 3 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 30 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

4741 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4747 4 6/18/2010 8/9/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4761 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4762 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4771 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4776 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4781 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4803 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4856 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4857 1 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4861 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4865 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4876 2 6/18/2010 10/5/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4908 2 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4920 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4945 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4948 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4967 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4978 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R4988 3 6/18/2010 7/19/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 4993 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R4997 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 31 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

5015 2 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5038 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5043 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5049 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5052 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5065 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5090 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5104 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5111 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5126 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5135 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5152 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5169 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5183 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5196 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5210 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5219 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5237 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5255 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5265 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5279 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5280 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 32 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

5283 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5300 2 6/18/2010 10/12/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5317 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5318 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5334 1 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5355 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5432 3 6/18/2010 9/24/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5470 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5475 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5477 2 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5529 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5546 3 6/18/2010 9/28/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5555 2 6/21/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5570 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5610 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5620 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5647 4 6/18/2010 8/24/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5711 2 6/18/2010 9/27/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5713 4 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5719 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5732 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5740 2 6/18/2010 10/5/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 33 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

5743 2 6/18/2010 10/19/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5758 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5759 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5762 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5802 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5818 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5823 3 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5839 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5848 4 6/18/2010 8/27/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5872 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5874 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5887 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5942 3 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5949 2 6/18/2010 10/5/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5954 2 6/18/2010 8/27/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5963 2 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5965 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R5971 4 6/22/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5975 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5979 3 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 5981 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R5983 2 6/18/2010 8/31/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 34 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

5992 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6005 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6008 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6046 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6069 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6096 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6118 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6149 4 6/18/2010 9/22/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6176 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6178 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6195 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6245 3 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6255 4 6/18/2010 9/28/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6257 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6279 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6283 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6285 4 6/18/2010 10/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6296 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6305 2 N/A – Plant Closureb 9/10/2010b X Version 1/2 Detailed R6307 4 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6322 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6329 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 35 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

6334 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6349 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6363 2 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6368 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6370 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6377 2 6/18/2010 10/25/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6403 4 6/21/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6419 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6420 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6436 4 6/18/2010 10/26/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6442 4 6/22/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6446 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6453 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6481 4 6/18/2010 8/27/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6515 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6517 2 6/18/2010 12/6/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6542 4 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6546 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6549 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6574 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6592 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6596 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 36 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

6598 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6599 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6602 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6606 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6616 2 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6622 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6627 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6634 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6635 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6664 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6671 3 6/25/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6672 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6688 1 6/18/2010 10/19/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6689 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6702 2 6/18/2010 8/26/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6712 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6726 3 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6727 3 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6739 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6750 2 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6767 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6773 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 37 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

6808 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6816 2 6/18/2010 10/7/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6838 4 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6848 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6856 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6894 2 6/18/2010 10/19/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6906 3 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6910 3 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6914 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6929 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6931 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6933 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6939 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R6942 2 6/18/2010 11/3/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6943 2 7/14/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6980 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6981 4 6/18/2010 8/9/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 6984 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R6998 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7015 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7017 3 6/18/2010 11/1/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7019 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 38 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

7022 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7029 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7063 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7070 1 6/21/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7086 2 6/18/2010 8/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7124 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7129 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7135 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7136 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7140 2 6/18/2010 11/3/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7162 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7166 2 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7168 4 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7175 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7178 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7186 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7213 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7256 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7264 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7267 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7276 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7278 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 39 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

7300 2 6/18/2010 9/30/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7301 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7311 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7332 2 6/25/2010 11/3/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7334 4 6/29/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7354 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7370 4 6/21/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7382 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7400 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7411 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7416 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7421 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7434 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7437 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7483 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7518 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7527 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7535 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7545 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7555 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7568 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7572 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 40 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

7582 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7584 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7587 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7596 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7610 4 6/18/2010 9/2/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7624 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7626 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7629 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7651 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7727 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7728 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7760 4 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7761 1 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7776 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7785 2 6/19/2010 9/22/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7800 2 6/18/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7815 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7821 1 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7825 2 6/18/2010 7/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7838 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7856 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7884 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 41 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

7892 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 7900 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7924 2 6/18/2010 10/8/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7925 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R7941 2 6/18/2010 9/7/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7951 2 6/18/2010 12/6/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R7980 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8003 4 6/18/2010 9/3/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8006 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8013 2 9/23/2010 9/23/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8046 4 6/18/2010 9/28/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8047 4 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8065 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8069 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8075 1 6/21/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8101 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8177 4 6/18/2010 7/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8179 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8187 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8192 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8196 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8202 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 42 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

8213 2 6/21/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8233 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8245 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8250 2 6/18/2010 9/22/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8281 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8294 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8308 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8353 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8359 2 6/18/2010 12/9/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8379 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8387 4 6/18/2010 12/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8395 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8405 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8418 2 6/21/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8437 1 6/21/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8451 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8460 1 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8462 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8471 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8490 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8493 4 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8499 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 43 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

8502 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8544 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8592 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8615 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8654 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8659 1 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8661 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8676 4 6/18/2010 9/7/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8704 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8730 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8731 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8744 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8750 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8752 1 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R8753 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8756 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8801 3 6/18/2010 9/30/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8816 3 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8817 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8870 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 8902 1 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8905 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 44 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

8965 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8969 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R8978 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9047 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9056 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9059 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9068 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9074 2 6/18/2010 9/7/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9078 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9093 3 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9097 3 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9120 1 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9155 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9161 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9166 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9168 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9175 2 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9210 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9213 2 6/18/2010 9/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9225 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9228 2 6/18/2010 9/7/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9229 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 45 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

9241 4 6/18/2010 9/22/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9260 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9289 1 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9294 4 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9325 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9345 1 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9370 3 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9373 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9374 2 6/18/2010 10/11/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9376 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9379 4 6/18/2010 9/15/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9390 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9391 2 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9397 4 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9412 2 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9420 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9442 1 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9446 2 6/18/2010 10/4/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9454 2 6/18/2010 10/12/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9475 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9480 2 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9481 2 6/18/2010 10/14/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 46 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

9498 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9504 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9522 4 6/18/2010 9/3/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9526 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9534 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9565 3 6/18/2010 9/13/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9591 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9614 2 6/18/2010 9/27/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9615 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9621 2 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9639 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9671 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9675 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9686 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9692 1 6/18/2010 10/19/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9715 1 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9724 4 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9760 4 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9761 3 6/18/2010 9/20/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9768 2 6/18/2010 9/10/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9777 2 6/18/2010 10/19/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9805 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R
Memorandum 

September 30, 2015 Page 47 

Table A-1. Summary of Steam Electric Survey Recipient, Corresponding Tracking and Review D

Plant ID 

Survey 

Version 

Date Plant Received 

Survey 

Date ERG Received 

Plant Response Completeness Check Type of 

9815 2 6/18/2010 10/18/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9831 2 6/18/2010 10/12/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9861 2 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9875 1 6/18/2010 10/15/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9886 2 6/18/2010 9/21/2010 X Version 1/2 Standard R9948 2 6/18/2010 10/13/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R9963 3 6/18/2010 9/16/2010 X Version 3/4 Review 9971 2 6/18/2010 9/17/2010 X Version 1/2 Detailed R

a – This is a complete listing of the Steam Electric Survey recipients and corresponding tracking and review data. 

b – Not applicable, plant closed. The “Date ERG Received Plant Response” represents the date EPA confirmed the plant closure.