alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the
Partnership), hereby certifies that the Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |     |  |                                                                  
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    MARK A. MAKI                                              
|                  |  |     |  | Mark A. Maki Vice PresidentFinance (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Hawai'i Island Escrow, Inc. v. Hand Escrow, Inc.

18872

2/12/98

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED FROM 9/30/97.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,301,991
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,979
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,058,726
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    124,500
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,500,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,501,528
<LOANS>                                     32,902,091
<ALLOWANCE>                                    358,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,955,252
<DEPOSITS>                                  36,454,040
<SHORT-TERM>                                   443,762
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            134,213
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,933
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,867,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              40,955,252
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,160,573
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               62,187
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               162,974
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,385,734
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,182,278
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,198,575
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,187,159
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   49,751
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,007,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,446
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     200,446
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   200,446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.39
<LOANS-NON>                                     55,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   151,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                400,789
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               332,253
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,382
<RECOVERIES>                                    12,378
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              358,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        358,000
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 70 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 70

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 3, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 596) to repeal the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and 
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) 90 minutes of debate equally divided among and controlled by the 
respective chairs and ranking minority members of the Committees on Education 
and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 839 

Encouraging the people of the United States to observe ‘‘National Lobster 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2016 

Mr. POLIQUIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging the people of the United States to observe 

‘‘National Lobster Day’’. 

Whereas the American lobster is recognized around the world 

as a prized and flavorful culinary delicacy, and should be 

so recognized on September 25, 2016, as ‘‘National Lobster Day’’; 

Whereas lobster fishing has served as an economic engine and 

family tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas thousands of families in the United States make 

their livelihoods from lobster fishing and processing; 

Whereas more than 120,000,000 pounds of lobster is caught 

each year in the waters of the United States, representing one of the most valuable catches in the United 

States; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 839 IH 

Whereas foreign markets for lobster from the United States 

are booming, with export values having more than doubled since 2009; 

Whereas historical lore notes that lobster likely joined turkey 

on the table at the very first Thanksgiving feast in 1621; 

Whereas responsible lobstering practices beginning in the 

1600s have created one of the most sustainable fisheries 

in the world; 

Whereas Lobster Newburg was featured at the inaugural dinner celebration for President John F. Kennedy; 

Whereas lobster is an excellent source of lean protein and is 

low in saturated fat and high in vitamin B12; 

Whereas lobster has become a culinary icon, with the lobster 

roll featured at the 2015 World Food Expo in Milan, 

Italy; 

Whereas the White House proudly served lobster at the State 

Dinner with Chinese President Xi Jinping on National 

Lobster Day in 2015; 

Whereas, on September 24, 2015, steamed lobster was prepared for the visit by Pope Francis to New York; 

Whereas lobster is enjoyed at casual beach-side lobster boils 

and also revered as a delicacy at fine dining restaurants; 

and 

Whereas the peak of the lobstering season in the United 

States occurs in the late summer: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages the people of the United States to observe ‘‘National 

3 Lobster Day’’ with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certifies
that the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: October 31, 2008

By:

/s/ MARK A. MAKI Mark A. Maki
Vice PresidentFinance
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
No. 92-8560.

#### Martinez *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Filed: 2/8/2018 10:32 PM 

Lynne Finley 

District Clerk 

Collin County, Texas 

By Christina Joseph Deputy 

Envelope ID: 22408311 

CAUSE NO. 366-83445-2016 

STATE OF TEXAS 

vs. 

ESTABAN GARCIA 

§ IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

§ 

§ 366th JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

§ 

§ COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS 

FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes ESTABAN GARCIA, Defendant in the above styled and numbered 

cause, and gives this written first amended notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of 

the State of Texas from the judgment of conviction and sentence herein rendered 

against ESTABAN GARCIA. 

First Amended Notice of Appeal 

ESTABAN GARCIA 

Respectfully submitted, 

Law Office of Marc J. Fratter 

1207 West University Drive 

Suite 101 

McKinney, Texas 75069 

Tel. (214) 471-3434 

Fax (972) 424-4719 

mfratter@yahoo.com 

Page 1 of2 

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 02/09/2018 11:19:56 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
By:/s/ Marc J. Fratter 

Marc J. Fratter 

State Bar No. 24029973 

Attorney for Defendant 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that on February 9, 2018, a true and correct copy of the above 

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Collin County, 

Texas, by hand delivery. 

/s/ Marc J. Fratter 

Marc J. Fratter 

First Amended Notice of Appeal 

ESTABAN GARCIA Page 2 of 2 

First Amended Notice of Appeal

ESTABAN GARCIA Page 2 of 2

By:/s/ Marc J. Fratter 

Marc J. Fratter

State Bar No. 24029973

Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on February 9, 2018, a true and correct copy of the above 

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Collin County, 

Texas, by hand delivery.

/s/ Marc J. Fratter

Marc J. Fratter
19035

#### Tax Appeal of American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., In re

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF CONESTOGA ENTERPRISES, INC.

1. The Conestoga Telephone and Telegraph Company
  Incorporated August 20, 1902
  Pennsylvania

  Operates - The Conestoga Telephone and Telegraph Company

2. Buffalo Valley Telephone Company
  Incorporated October 18, 1995
  Pennsylvania

  Operates - Buffalo Valley Telephone Company

3. CEI Networks, Inc.
  Incorporated December, 1994
  Delaware

  Operates - CEI Networks, Inc.

4. Conestoga Mobile Systems, Inc.
  Incorporated April 1, 1991
  Pennsylvania

  Operates Conestoga Mobile Systems, Inc.

5. Conestoga Wireless Company
  Incorporated January 1, 1998
  Pennsylvania

  Operates - Conestoga Wireless Company

6. Conestoga Investment Corporation
  Incorporated November 27, 1996
  Delaware

  Operates - Conestoga Investment Corporation

7. Infocore, Inc.
  Incorporated March 3, 1997
  Pennsylvania

  Operates - Infocore, Inc.

                                      -80-
# C_2020271EN.01001901.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — WT v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara

(Case C-448/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents - Directive 2003/109/EC - Article 12 - Adoption of a decision to expel a long-term resident - Elements to be taken into consideration - National case-law - Failure to take those elements into consideration - Compatibility - Directive 2001/40/EC - Mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals - Relevance)

(2020/C 271/26)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: WT

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12 of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which, as interpreted by national case-law with reference to Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 concerning the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals, provides for the expulsion of any third-country national who holds a long-term residence permit who has committed a criminal offence punishable by a custodial sentence of at least one year, without it being necessary to examine whether the third country national represents a genuine and sufficiently serious threat to public order or public security or to take into account the duration of residence in the territory of that Member State, the age of the person concerned, the consequences of expulsion for the person concerned and family members and the links with the country of residence or the absence of links with the country of origin.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         580,757
<SECURITIES>                                   607,882
<RECEIVABLES>                                  874,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,870
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,065,981
<PP&E>                                         221,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,861,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          423,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,421
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,397,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,861,692
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,770,120
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,771,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,152,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,152,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,152,749
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

AIR - Processing Incoming Administrative Inspection Review 

Documents by CVB

CVB-WI-0144 04

ICWI0241.04

CVB-WI-IC

28 Oct 2022

CVB-Released
# C_2019065EN.01004802.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/48

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGCPRO)

(Case T-523/18) (1)

(2019/C 65/66)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 29.10.2018.

---
# C_2021079EN.01001301.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.

(Case C-619/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Aarhus Convention - Directive 2003/4/EC - Public access to environmental information - ‘Stuttgart 21’ infrastructure project - Refusal of a request for environmental information - Article 4(1) - Grounds for refusal - Term ‘internal communications’ - Scope - Limitation in time of the protection of such communications)

(2021/C 79/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Land Baden-Württemberg

Respondent: D.R.

Other parties: Deutsche Bahn AG, Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 4(1)(e) of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘internal communications’ covers all information which circulates within a public authority and which, on the date of the request for access, has not left that authority’s internal sphere — as the case may be, after being received by that authority, provided that it was not or should not have been made available to the public before it was so received. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 4(1)(e) of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘internal communications’ covers all information which circulates within a public authority and which, on the date of the request for access, has not left that authority’s internal sphere — as the case may be, after being received by that authority, provided that it was not or should not have been made available to the public before it was so received.

| 2. | Article 4(1)(e) of Directive 2003/4 must be interpreted as meaning that the applicability of the exception to the right of access to environmental information provided for by it in respect of internal communications of a public authority is not limited in time. However, that exception can apply only for the period during which protection of the information sought is justified. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 4(1)(e) of Directive 2003/4 must be interpreted as meaning that the applicability of the exception to the right of access to environmental information provided for by it in respect of internal communications of a public authority is not limited in time. However, that exception can apply only for the period during which protection of the information sought is justified.

---

(1)  OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.

---
June 18, 2002

23677

#### Siqueira v. Brunn

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                       128
<INVENTORY>                                     11,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,511
<PP&E>                                          97,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,355
<SALES>                                         96,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,123
<CGS>                                           59,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,070
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,166)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### Wailehua v. State

24123

06/07/2002

Affirmed