alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                       1,420,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,222,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 63,769,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,560,937
<PP&E>                                      23,109,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,695,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       85,195,749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,969
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,523,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,695,481
<SALES>                                     39,400,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,400,964
<CGS>                                       24,147,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,796,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,548,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,091,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.56)


</TABLE>
5. As of the date of this Third Amendment, Section 15.10 of the Merger Agreement shall bedeleted in its entirety and the following shall be inserted in its place and stead:     15.10 **Assignments, Successors, and No Third-Party Rights.**No partymay assign any of its rights or delegate its obligations under thisAgreement without the prior consent of the other parties, except that DUSAmay assign its rights or delegate its obligations hereunder to itsAffiliates so long as DUSA remains ultimately liable for all of DUSA’sobligations hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, DUSA shall have thesole right to manage all business matters related to the Products and NewProducts, including, but not limited to, any and all activities relating tolicensing, marketing, promoting, detailing, distributing, manufacturing,selling, transferring or offering the Products or New Products in DUSA’ssole discretion without the consent of the other Parties; all such decisionsmade pursuant to this Section 15.10 shall not be deemed an assignment or adelegation of obligations under this Section 15.10. Subject to thepreceding sentences, this Agreement will apply to, be binding in allrespects upon, and inure to the benefit of the successors and permittedassigns of the parties. Nothing expressed or referred to in this Agreementwill be construed to give any Person other than the parties to thisAgreement any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim under or withrespect to this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement. ThisAgreement and all of its provisions and conditions are for the sole andexclusive benefit of the parties to this Agreement and their successors andassigns.     6. All other terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement shall remain unchanged and in fullforce and effect.     7. This Third Amendment shall not constitute a waiver or modification of any of the Parties’rights and remedies or of any of the terms, conditions, warranties, representations, or covenantscontained in the Merger Agreement, except as specifically set forth above, and each Party herebyreserves all of its rights and remedies pursuant to the Merger Agreement and applicable law, andexcept as otherwise set forth in that certain Release Agreement, dated as of the date hereof,between DUSA and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sirius Laboratories, Inc., the ShareholdersRepresentatives and the Principal Shareholders.     8. This Third Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when taken together,shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.*[Signature Pages Follow]*
-2-

 
     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed and delivered this Third Amendment to MergerAgreement as of the date first written above.      **DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15

                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LETTERHEAD


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries:

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Education 
Management Corporation (a Pennsylvania corporation) and Subsidiaries as of 
March 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income for the 
three-month and nine-month periods then ended, and the related consolidated 
statement of cash flows for the nine-month period then ended. These financial 
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the 
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim 
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to 
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and 
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted 
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of 
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken 
as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should 
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in 
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                             /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                             -----------------------

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
  April 14, 1997
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id:**

**Series title: Labor force status:**  **Type of data: Age:**  **Years:**

**Year Jan**  **Feb Mar**  **Apr May**  **Jun Jul**  **Aug Sep**  **Oct Nov**  **Dec 2001**  5711 5637 5513 5427 5494 5651 5679 5642 5579 5610 5626 5546 **2002** 5582 5535 5623 5660 5721 5824 5777 5769 5581 5567 5623 5704 **2003** 5711 5759 5873 5934 5942 6064 6060 5997 6033 5872 5956 5996 **2004** 60456019 5983 61156213 6299629862856274 6294 6193 6164 **2005** 6189 6204 62186114 6320 6330 6313 6267 6289 62756371 6323 **2006** 6388 6250 6277 6294 6332 63656393 6488 6409 64196339 6386 **2007** 6587 64586625669866886761 66596671 669567296792 6952 **2008** 6860 672567186863 6919 7006 7055 7097 7020 6872 6886 6919 **2009** 6964 6946 6931 6921 6901 6916 7029 7201 7179 7286 7277 7444 **2010** 7440 7301 7226 7178 7195 7357 7322 7449 7469 7664 7778 7827 **2011** 7909 7852 7773 7749 7743 7897 7918 7887 7835 Not in labor force Number in thousands 60 to 64 years 2001 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**

LNU05000096 **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 60-64 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:53 AM)Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Annual** 5593 5664 5933 6182 6268 6362 6693 6912 7083 7434

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:53 AM)
Item_5.2.6.2_Use of the terms ‘fetal’, ‘foetal’, ‘fetus’ and ‘foetus’ / page 1

Annex 20

TERMINOLOGY: USE OF THE TERMS‘BOVID’, ‘BOVIDAE’, ‘BOVINE’ AND ‘CATTLE’

USER'S GUIDE

[...]

**B*. Terrestrial Code* content**

[...]

These standards assume that the agent is either not present in the importing country or is the subject of a control or eradication programme. Sections 8 to 15 each relate to the host species of the pathogenic agent: multiple species or single species of Apidae, Aves,~~Bovidae~~ Bovinae, Equidae, Leporidae, Caprinae and Suidae. Some chapters include specific measures to prevent and control the infections of global concern. Although the OIE aims to include a chapter for each OIE listed disease, not all OIE listed diseases have been covered yet by a specific chapter. This is work in progress, depending on available scientific knowledge and the priorities set by the World Assembly.

[...]

___________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------

Article 1.3.2.

The following are included within the category of~~cattle~~ bovine diseases and *infections*:

[...]

___________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 11.~~BOVIDAE~~ BOVINAE

___________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Ibis Technology Corporation (the *“Company”*) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the *“Report”*), I, Martin J. Reid, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 
| Dated: March 29, 2006                  |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ ***Martin J. Reid***               | *** *** |
| Martin J. Reid                         |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

LEROY O. WILLIAMS,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

PETER O’ROURKE, ACTING SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-2186

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 16-1126, Chief Judge Robert N. 

Davis.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JONATHAN BRYAN KELLY, Jonathan Kelly & Associates, Raleigh, NC, argued for claimant-appellant.

 AGATHA KOPROWSKI, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by CHAD A. READLER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN,

JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.; BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, CHRISTINA 
 

LYNN GREGG, Office of General Counsel, United States 

Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Clerk of Court
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ronnie Dale Walker, * From the 104th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 19306B.

Vs. No. 11-15-00165-CR * May 27, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### Northup v. Tanaka

17058

11/02/94

Affirmed
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-174-CV

MRI COUNTRY BEND INVESTMENT	APPELLANTS

FUND, L.P. AND MRI RIVER GLEN

INVESTMENT FUND, L.P.

	V.

CAPITOL PAINTING &	APPELLEE

CONSTRUCTION, INC.

	------------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellants MRI Country Bend Investment Fund, L.P. and MRI River Glen Investment Fund, L.P. attempt to appeal from the trial court’s May 7, 2009, order denying their motion to dissolve pre-judgment writs of garnishment.  Appellee Capitol Painting & Construction, Inc. moves to dismiss the appeal on 

the ground that the May 7 order is not an appealable interlocutory order and seeks damages as the prevailing party in a frivolous appeal.2  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment.3  Interlocutory orders are not appealable unless they fall within the exceptions provided by the legislature in section 51.014 of the civil practice and remedies code.4  None of those exceptions apply here.  Therefore, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal and must dismiss the case.5  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and appellee’s motion for sanctions.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 23, 2009
# C_2020201EN.01005502.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/55

---

Order of the General Court of 15 April 2020 — Twitter v EUIPO — 123billets and Hachette Filipacchi Presse (PERISCOPE)

(Case T-682/18) (1)

(2020/C 201/71)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
Page 1 of 2

DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT

WELSH GOVERNMENT

 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL AFFAIRS - NORTHERN IRELAND

Veterinary Health Certificate for the Import of Live Fish, Fertilized Eggs, or Gametes of

Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC)-Susceptible Species into the United States of America

Veterinary Authority:*

Scottish Government

Certificate Number:*

Date of Issue:* U.S. Import Permit Number:*

1. Consignor (Name & Address):* 2. Consignee (Name & Address):*

3. Country of Origin:*

Scotland

4. Destination in United States (Name & Address):*

5. City/Region of Origin: 6. Route of Travel:*

7. Port of Embarkation/Border Crossing:* 8. Means of Transport:*

9. Estimated Date of Shipment:* 10. Estimated Date of Arrival:*

11. Description of Commodity:

******************************************

12. Date Of Veterinary Inspection in Country of Origin:*

13. Total Quantity of Animals:* 14. Total Number Of Packages/Containers:*

16. Commodity Intended Use:*

Breeding Culture/grow out Research

17. Identification of Commodity:*

Scientific Name*

(Genus species) 

Common Name* Quantity* Sex

*Required Information that must be provided.

UNOFFICIAL COPY
Page 2 of 2

Veterinary Authority:* Certificate Number:*

I, the undersigned official veterinarian or fish health inspector of the competent authority, certify that the live 

animals described above meet thefollowing conditions:

1. Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC):

a. The facility of origin participates in an ongoing Spring Viremia of Carp (SVC) monitoring program for

species susceptible to SVC, by testing twice annually for a minimum of two (2) consecutive years, with at

least three (3) months between tests. AND

b. Populations were tested at a ninety-five (95) percent confidence and two (2) percent assumed prevalence

level, and found negative for SVC. AND

c. Sample collection was done at times when water temperatures are conducive to detecting SVC virus. AND

d. Samples were collected by a fish health inspector, employed by the competent authority. AND

e. Cell cultures were incubated on epithelioma papulosum cyprinid (EPC) cell lines at twenty (20) degrees

Celsius, in line with OIE recommended procedure. All testing results were negative for SVC.

2. The consignment was inspected by an official veterinarian or fish health inspector employed by the exporting

country’s competent authority within seventy-two (72) hours of shipment and found to be free of any clinical

evidence of SVC disease.

3. Shipping Containers:

a. All shipping containers are new.

***********************************************************************************************

***********************************************************************************************

Printed Name of Certifying Official: 

Signature of Certifying Official: 

Designation of Certifying official:

Date: Stamp: 

Scottish Government

UNOFFICIAL COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 893 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 893

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 954) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to exempt from the individual mandate certain individuals who had coverage 
under a terminated qualified health plan funded through the Consumer Operated 
and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
USDA, APHIS, PPQ

2281 W Heyrend Way

Idaho Falls, ID 83401

Data Source:

USDA APHIS PPQ

USDA FSA

These data, and all the information contained therein, have been collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), or by its cooperators on APHIS’ behalf, for restricted

government purposes only and is the sole property of APHIS. See full disclaimer: www.aphis.usda.gov/help/map-disclaimer

United States

Department of

Agriculture

PALE CYST NEMATODE - IDAHO

Regulated Fields - November 29, 2021

0 2.5 5

Miles

0 2.5 5

Kilometers

Date Created:

11/22/2021

[

Document Path: C:\GIS\PCN\Projects\WebMap\2021_1122\PCN Web Map.aprx Coordinate System: GCS WGS 1984

T 01 N

R 32 E

T 01 N

R 33 E

T 01 N

R 34 E

T 01 N

R 35 E

T 01 N

R 36 E

T 01 N

R 37 E

T 01 N

R 38 E

T 01 N

R 39 E

T 01 S

R 32 E T 01 S

R 33 E

T 01 S

R 34 E

T 01 S

R 35 E

T 01 S

R 36 E

T 01 S

R 37 E

T 01 S

R 38 E

T 01 S

R 39 E

T 02 N

R 32 E

T 02 N

R 33 E

T 02 N

R 34 E

T 02 N

R 35 E

T 02 N

R 36 E

T 02 N

R 37 E

T 02 N

R 38 E

T 02 N

R 39 E

T 02 S

R 32 E

T 02 S

R 33 E

T 02 S

R 34 E

T 02 S

R 35 E

T 02 S

R 36 E

T 02 S

R 37 E

T 02 S

R 38 E

T 02 S

R 39 E

T 03 N

R 32 E

T 03 N

R 33 E

T 03 N

R 34 E

T 03 N

R 35 E

T 03 N

R 36 E

T 03 N

R 37 E

T 03 N

R 38 E

T 03 N

R 39 E

AMMON

BASALT

BLACKFOOT

FIRTH

IDAHO FALLS

IONA

SHELLEY

Regulated Fields

Idaho Idaho

Bonneville County

Bingham County
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Mark Smith et al 

Complainant 

v. 

City of Santa Monica 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Order 

FAA Docket No. 16-16-02 

The City of Santa Monica seeks an extension of time to file its response because it needs 

additional time to prepare an appropriate response. Complainants have agreed to this motion. 

The motion is hereby granted and Santa Monica's response is due on April I I, 2016. 

cting Director, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 22,2016, I caused to be placed in the United Sates mail 

(first class mail, postage prepaid) or personally delivered, a true copy of the Order granting an 

Extension ofTime to April 11 , 2016, for FAA Docket 16-16-02 addressed to: 

Attorney for Complainants: 

Richard K. Simon 

1 700 Seeker School Lane 

Malibu, CA 90265 

rsimon3@verizon.net 

Attorneys for the Respondent 

Scott P. Lewis 

Anderson & Kreiger LLP 

1 Canal Park, Suite 200 

Cambridge, Ma 02141 

slewis@andersonkrieger.com 

Masha Moutrie 

City Attorney 

City of Santa Monica 

1685 Main Street, Room 21 0 

Santa Monica, CA 9040 1 

Marsha.moutrie@smgov .net 

oberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

And Management Analysis