alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Author:

Section/Area:

Release Date:

Notes:

Technical Notes Regarding Establishing Control Chart Parameters

CVB-WI-5224 01

MREISING

CVB-WI-PEL-STAT

22 Jan 2020

To accompany Draft 440

Title: Technical Notes Regarding Establishing Control Chart Parameters

Release Date: 22 Jan 2020 Author: MREISING Document Number: CVB-WI-5224.01

CONTROLLED//PROPIN//BASIC

Printed by: CRRYAN on 22 Jan 2020, 08:18:11 am.

Controlled by: APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics, 515-337-6100
Title: Technical Notes Regarding Establishing Control Chart Parameters

Release Date: 22 Jan 2020 Author: MREISING Document Number: CVB-WI-5224.01

CONTROLLED//PROPIN//BASIC

Printed by: CRRYAN on 22 Jan 2020, 08:18:11 am.

Controlled by: APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics, 515-337-6100
Title: Technical Notes Regarding Establishing Control Chart Parameters

Release Date: 22 Jan 2020 Author: MREISING Document Number: CVB-WI-5224.01

CONTROLLED//PROPIN//BASIC

Printed by: CRRYAN on 22 Jan 2020, 08:18:11 am.

Controlled by: APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics, 515-337-6100
Title: Technical Notes Regarding Establishing Control Chart Parameters

Release Date: 22 Jan 2020 Author: MREISING Document Number: CVB-WI-5224.01

CONTROLLED//PROPIN//BASIC

Printed by: CRRYAN on 22 Jan 2020, 08:18:11 am.

Controlled by: APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics, 515-337-6100
Title: Technical Notes Regarding Establishing Control Chart Parameters

Release Date: 22 Jan 2020 Author: MREISING Document Number: CVB-WI-5224.01

CONTROLLED//PROPIN//BASIC

Printed by: CRRYAN on 22 Jan 2020, 08:18:11 am.

Controlled by: APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics, 515-337-6100
#### State v. Gaines

16654

3/16/95

Affirmed
#### State v. Shabazz

23571, 23575

06/28/2002

Denied

98 Hawai'i 358, 48 P.3d 605
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Lawrence, Also Known as Mary Horwood, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

January 21, 1971.

*Caragol & Carson*for petitioner. *Vincent J. Flanagan,*guardian ad litem.

Alexander Berman, J.

In this probate proceeding it appears that a child, now about 12 years of age, was born to the testatrix after the execution of her will on November 30,1954. The mother died on October 2, 1970 and was also survived by an adult son.

The supplemental petition by the son requests that the decree “reserve the rights that [the after-born] may have to take against the last Will and Testament of the decedent herein.” The after-born child was not provided for by any settlement, and she was neither provided for nor in any way mentioned in the will. Therefore, under EPTL 5-3.2 she is entitled to a portion of the estate, the extent of her interest therein being governed by said statute.

The son of the testatrix was under 21 years of age when she executed the will. Provision was made in the will for him but his share was placed in trust during minority. EPTL 5-3.2 (subd. [a],par. [1], subpar. [B], els. [ii] and [iii]) directs: “ (ii) The after-born child shall receive such share of the * * * estate * * * as [s]he would have received had the testat[rix] includ[ed] * * * (the after-born) with the [child] upon whom benefits were conferred under the will, and given an equal share of the estate to * * * such child. “ (iii) To the extent that it is feasible, the interest of the after-born # * shall be *of the same character,*whether an equitable or legal life estate or in fee, as the interest which the testat[rix] *conferred upon*[her] [child] *under the will.”*(Emphasis and matter in brackets supplied.)

*412As a result of the statute, the after-horn daughter is clearly entitled to an equal share with her half-brother, hut her share must be held in trust until she reaches the age of 21 because the interest *conferred upon*the other child by the will had the *character*of such an express trust.

The decedent’s father was named in the will as executor and as trustee but he is not living. The court is informed that one, James Dorman, named in the will as substitute executor and trustee and who renounced as executor but not as trustee, is not able to serve as trustee. Accordingly, the court directs that, upon the filing of a renunciation, the parties should suggest a suitable person to qualify as trustee in his place, preferably someone not having a conflict of interest. Such appointment may, however, he postponed until the time for distribution.

Settle decree on five days’ notice, with three additional days if service is made by mail, admitting the will to probate, directing letters testamentary to issue, and providing for the interest of the daughter to be paid over to an appropriate trustee to be held and administered until she becomes 21 years of age on the same conditions as directed in the will and with the same benefits as were thereunder conferred upon the son.
19109

#### State v. Hinton

February 4, 1997

Order No. 97-11

Vacated in part, Granted in part. Affirmed in part
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,590,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 65,282,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,239,692
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,521,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       63,735,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,284,135
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,824,614)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,521,889
<SALES>                                     33,071,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,159,127
<CGS>                                       30,444,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,444,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,887,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                594,306
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,773,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,368,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,368,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 723 

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for the designation 

of a National Day of Recognition for the centennial of the Convention 

Between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada) for the 

Protection of Migratory Birds, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2016 

Mr. GRIFFITH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the support of the House of Representatives for 

the designation of a National Day of Recognition for 

the centennial of the Convention Between the United 

States and Great Britain (for Canada) for the Protection 

of Migratory Birds, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the United States and Great Britain (on behalf of 

Canada), recognizing the need to adopt an international 

agreement to protect and conserve birds that migrate 

internationally, signed the Convention Between the 

United States and Great Britain (for Canada) for the 

Protection of Migratory Birds, also known as the Migratory Bird Treaty, on August 16, 1916; 

Whereas this agreement served as the foundation for the passage of domestic legislation to implement the commitVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:29 May 11, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR723.IH HR723

sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 723 IH 

ment to protect migratory birds, such as the Migratory 

Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), as well as subsequent treaties with Mexico, Japan, and Russia; 

Whereas many migratory bird species travel long distances 

and cross international borders; 

Whereas international cooperation provides countries—as well 

as Federal, State, nongovernmental, and tribal partners—with the opportunity to unite in protecting valuable wildlife species and to share knowledge regarding 

migratory bird resources; and 

Whereas migratory bird species have a significant impact on 

the United States economy, as evidenced by the United 

States Fish and Wildlife Service estimates that 

$107,000,000,000 is spent on birdwatching equipment 

and travel in the United States, and $1,800,000,000 is 

spent on migratory bird hunting equipment and trips in 

the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a National Day 

3 of Recognition for the centennial of the Convention 

4 Between the United States and Great Britain (for 

5 Canada) for the Protection of Migratory Birds, also 

6 known as the Migratory Bird Treaty; 

7 (2) recognizes the significance of 100 years of 

8 migratory bird protection efforts; and 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 723 IH 

1 (3) encourages efforts to engage and educate 

2 the public regarding migratory birdwatching and 

3 hunting. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019423EN.01004201.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Destilerias MG (MG PUMA)

(Case T-500/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark MG PUMA - Earlier EU word mark GINMG - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 423/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. Trieb and M. Schunke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Zajfert, A. Folliard Monguiral and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Destilerias MG, SL (Vilanova i la Geltru, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2018 (Case R 2019/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Destilerias MG and Puma.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Puma SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Puma SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
21904

#### Kahana Villa Vacation Club v. County of Maui

Affirmed
Chapter 2.4.4. – Infection with Marteilia refringens

Annex 13. Item 6.5.2. – Article 9.4.3. of Chapter 9.4. ‘Infection with *Hepatobacter penaei*’

CHAPTER 9.4.

INFECTION WITH *HEPATOBACTER PENAEI*(NECROTISING HEPATOPANCREATITIS)

[...]

Article 9.4.3.

Measures for the importation or transit of aquatic animal products for any purpose regardless of the *H. penaei* status of the exporting country, zone or compartment

The *aquatic animal products* listed below have been assessed as meeting the criteria for safety of *aquatic animal products* in accordance with Article 5.4.1. When authorising the importation or transit of these *aquatic animal products*, *Competent Authorities* should not require any *sanitary measures* related to *H. penaei,* regardless of the infection with *H. penaei* status of the *exporting country*, *zone* or *compartment*:

1)	*aquatic animal products*that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least ~~63~~95°C for at least ~~30~~five minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates *H. penaei*;

2)	crustacean *meal*that has been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least ~~63~~95°C for at least ~~30~~five minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates *H. penaei*;

3)	crustacean oil;

4)	chemically extracted chitin.

[...]

____________

WOAH *Aquatic Manual* 2025	8
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HITESMAN, GASTON, and RUSSELL, 

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Michael A. OLIVEIRA

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 201900171

Decided: 30 October 2019.

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 20 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval 

Base Kitsap-Bangor, Silverdale, Washington, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to E-1, confinement for 10 months,1 and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Kevin R. Larson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

 

1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 9 months pursuant to a pretrial agreement. 
United States v. Oliveira, No. 201900171

2

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
22092

#### Kimura v. State, Dept. of Corrections

Affirmed
# C_2020054EN.01004601.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-21/18) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Fruit and vegetable sectors - Aid to producer groups - Expenditure incurred by Poland - Deficiencies in key and secondary controls - Verification of recognition plans and recognition criteria - Checks on applications for aid - Eligibility of producer groups - Economic consistency - Necessity and eligibility for financing - Reasonableness of the expenditure - Systemic deficiencies - Risk to EAGF - Corrective measures - Flat-rate corrections of 25 %)

(2020/C 54/50)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Pawlicka and D. Krawczyk, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2014 of 8 November 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 292, p. 61).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---
Publicado en mayo de 2012

Material para el programa núm. 2117

La siguiente es una historia de terror: 

Las especies invasoras representan una 

amenaza para todo nuestro ecosistema.

Aprenda cómo dejar a estas 

plagas hambrientas atrás en

Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección de Salud de Animales y Plantas 

? “ TE GUSTA 

 DEVORAR

 LIBROS? 

 YO PREFIERO

 LOS CULTIVOS

 Y LOS 

 ARBOLES.

”
Hay muchas maneras en que usted puede 

ayudar a detener la propagación de las 

especies invasoras, sin importar dónde 

usted viva, a saber: en primer lugar, 

previniendo su entrada.

Compre leña local; encienda leña local.

Las plagas invasoras y las larvas pueden 

esconderse y recorrer largas distancias en la 

leña. Compre la leña donde la encenderá.

Siembre con cuidado. Compre sus plantas 

de un proveedor con able y evite usar 

especies de plantas invasoras.

No traiga o envíe por correo frutas frescas, 

vegetales o plantas de estado a estado, 

a menos que sean autorizadas por los 

inspectores agrícolas con anterioridad.

Coopere con las restricciones impuestas 

bajo las cuarentenas y permita que los 

trabajadores agrícolas autorizados entren a 

su propiedad para realizar inspecciones.

Manténgalo limpio. Lave el equipo para 

actividades al aire libre y las gomas entre los 

viajes de pesca, caza y acampar. Limpie los 

muebles de patio y los artículos de exterior 

al moverlos de una casa a otra.

Aprenda a identi carlas. Si ve señales 

de una plaga invasora o una enfermedad, 

infórmelas en www.PlagasHambrientas.com.

Provea la información. Infórmeles todos 

los artículos agrícolas a los o ciales de 

aduana al regresar de viajes al extranjero.

DEJE A

LAS PLAGAS 

HAMBRIENTAS

ATRAS

VISITE
Mark E. McKinnon

Matthew J. Clark Mark.McKinnon@dentons.com

Matthew.Clark@dentons.com

D 703.336.8708

D 703.336.8714

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

United State s

T 703.336.8800

F 703.336.8750 Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

July 22

, 2015

To Wh om it May Concern :

RTI Group, LLC (RTI) was issued Exemption No. 11946 on June 30, 2015 (hereinafter "the

Exemption"), allowing commercial operation of small UAS for aerial data collection. RTI hereby

requests an amendment to Cond itions and Limitations No. 2 of the Exemption to authorize UAS

operations f

or the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming. A copy of RTI's

Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual

, which contains proprietary and confidential

information, was submitted electronically via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov on June 25

, 2015.

RTI believes an amendment authorizing closed

- set motion picture and television filming is in

the publi c's interest as it would reduce hazards and emissions associated with alternate use of

helicopters to conduct similar closed

- set filming operations. RTI's UAS are light weight and do not

carry any flammable fuel, fur ther reducing the risk from any potential accident. As this is an

amendment to an existing exemption that seeks to add closed

- set motion picture and television

filming

, RTI respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published

in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

If you have any questions, or need any additional information to process the requested

amendment to the Exemption, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: RTI Group, LLC Petition to Amend Exemption No. 11946 (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1455)U.S. Department of Transportation

July 2 2 , 2015

Page 2

C ounsel for RTI Group, LLC

AttachmentU.S. Department of T ransportation

July 2 2 , 2015

Page 3

(The following attached item w as submitted under separate cover as i t contain s proprietary and

commercial information exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §

522 et seq.

, and should be hel d in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b)).

Attachment s :

R TI Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 946 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 946

  To make loans and loan guarantees under section 502 of the Railroad 
    Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 available for 
  implementing positive train control systems, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York (for himself and Mr. Peterson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make loans and loan guarantees under section 502 of the Railroad 
    Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 available for 
  implementing positive train control systems, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commuter Rail Passenger Safety 
Act''.

SEC. 2. POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEMS.

    Section 502(b)(1) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory 
Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822(b)(1)), is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``or'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``facilities.'' and 
        inserting ``facilities; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) implement a positive train control system, as 
                required by section 20157 of title 49, United States 
                Code.''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF RAILROAD SAFETY TECHNOLOGY GRANTS.

    Section 20158(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$100,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``2009 through 2013'' and inserting ``2016 
        through 2020''.
                                 <all>
```