alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Dominique Shaquille Marquis Harvey, 

Appellant

No. 06-19-00124-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47184-B). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Dominique Shaquille Marquis Harvey, has adequately indicated 

his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 21, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2010 on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd S. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify in such capacity, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the periods reflected therein.
 Date: May 11, 2010 By:
    
    /s/ Todd S. NelsonTodd S. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer
  3
#### Matsumoto v. Macias.

18445

12/26/96

Reversed in part, Vacated in part and Remanded
# C_2018190EN.01001302.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 27 March 2018 — Minister for Justice and Equality v LM

(Case C-216/18)

(2018/C 190/18)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister for Justice and Equality

Applicant:

Defendant: LM

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Notwithstanding the conclusions of the Court of Justice in Aranyosi and Caldararu, where a national court determines there is cogent evidence that conditions in the issuing Member State are incompatible with the fundamental right to a fair trial because the system of justice itself in the issuing Member State is no longer operating under the rule of law, is it necessary for the executing judicial authority to make any further assessment, specific and precise, as to the exposure of the individual concerned to the risk of unfair trial where his trial will take place within a system no longer operating within the rule of law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Notwithstanding the conclusions of the Court of Justice in Aranyosi and Caldararu, where a national court determines there is cogent evidence that conditions in the issuing Member State are incompatible with the fundamental right to a fair trial because the system of justice itself in the issuing Member State is no longer operating under the rule of law, is it necessary for the executing judicial authority to make any further assessment, specific and precise, as to the exposure of the individual concerned to the risk of unfair trial where his trial will take place within a system no longer operating within the rule of law?

| 2. | If the test to be applied requires a specific assessment of the requested person’s real risk of a flagrant denial of justice and where the national court has concluded that there is a systemic breach of the rule of law, is the national court as executing judicial authority obliged to revert to the issuing judicial authority for any further necessary information that could enable the national court discount the existence of the risk to an unfair trial and if so, what guarantees as to fair trial would be required? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the test to be applied requires a specific assessment of the requested person’s real risk of a flagrant denial of justice and where the national court has concluded that there is a systemic breach of the rule of law, is the national court as executing judicial authority obliged to revert to the issuing judicial authority for any further necessary information that could enable the national court discount the existence of the risk to an unfair trial and if so, what guarantees as to fair trial would be required?

---
#### State v. Sandoval

19912

11/28/97

Vacated and Remanded
NO. 06-14-00186-CR, 06-14-00187-CR, 06-14-00188-CR

TO THE COURT OF APPEALS SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA DARRIAN DE’ANTHONY DAVIS-SANDERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

* * * * * APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF * * * * *

DONALD K. HOOVER

Counsel for Appellant Bar I.D. No. 24053019 414 W. Sam Rayburn Bonham, Texas 75418 903/820-8464 (Telephone) 972/767-4355 (Facsimile)

NO. 06-14-00186-CR, 06-14-00187-CR, 06-14-00188-CR ACCEPTED 06-14-00187-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/16/2015 2:17:21 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKNO. 06-14-00186-CR, 06-14-00187-CR, 06-14-00188-CR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA DARRIAN DE’ANTHONY DAVIS-SANDERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee * * * * * APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF * * * * * TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA: Comes now the Appellant, by and th rough his counsel of record, and respectfully requests this Court grant him anextension of time to file his appellant brief in the above named causes, pursuant to Rule 10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On September 19, 2014, the Appellant was adjudicated and sentenced to 60 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. On October 17, 2014 the Appellant timely filed his Notice of Appeal. Mr. Davis -Sanders also filed a motion for new trialon October 17, 2014, which was denied by operation of law. The reporter’s record and clerk’s record were with the Court on or about February 12, 2015. Counsel for the Appe llant received the clerk’s and reporter’s records on the same date. The Appellant’s brief is due on March 16, 2015. Counsel for the Appellant was in trial, three of the last four weeks. Additional time is necessary for Appellant’s counsel to finish review of the record, research and identify the grounds for appeal, and consult with the Appellant to draft a brief. Appellant counsel now makes his first re quest for an extension of time to file the Appellant’s Brief. The Appellant re quests an extension of time until April 16, 2015 to file the Appellant’s brief. This reque st is not for the purpose of delay, but so that justice may be done. WHEREFORE, the Appellant prays that the Court grant this motion for extension of time in which to file his appellate brief in this case. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Donald Hoover Donald Hoover Counsel for Appellant Bar I.D. No. 24053019 414 W. Sam Rayburn Bonham, Texas 75418 (903) 820-8464 (Telephone) (972) 767-4355 (Facsimile)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A copy of the foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellate Brief has been mailed via firs t-class mail, or hand-delivered, on March 12, 2015, to: Via Hand Delivery Fannin County District Attorney’s Office Fannin County Courthouse 101 E. Sam Rayburn Bonham, Texas 75418 Via first-class mail Mr. Darrian D. Davis-Sanders #01957802 Eastham Unit- TDCJ 2665 Prison Road #1 Lovelady, Texas 75851

/s/ Donald Hoover Donald Hoover
SC-383 (03/17) 1 of 2 USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION

RECORDS REVIEW

OFFICE: REVIEWER: DATES COVERED:

Inspector’s Name Record Identification Commodity Non-Conformities/Remarks

Corrective

Action 

Needed? 

(Y/N)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.
SC-383 (03/17) 2 of 2

Inspector’s Name Record Identification Commodity Non-Conformities/Remarks

Corrective 

Action 

Needed? 

(Y/N)

12. 

13

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.
Chapter 2.4.4. – Infection with Marteilia refringens

Annex 25. Item 6.5.3. – Article 10.9.3. of Chapter 10.9. ‘Infection with SVCV’

CHAPTER 10.9.

INFECTION WITH SPRING VIRAEMIA OF CARP VIRUS

[...]

Article 10.9.3.

Measures for the importation or transit of aquatic animal products for any purpose regardless of the infection with SVCV status of the exporting country, zone or compartment

The *aquatic animal products*listed below have been assessed as meeting the criteria for safety of *aquatic animal****products*in accordance with Article 5.4.1. When authorising the importation or transit of these *aquatic animal products*, *Competent Authorities*should not require any sanitary measures related to SVCV, regardless of the SVCV status of the *exporting country*, *zone*or *compartment*:

1)	*aquatic animal products*that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least ~~90~~60°C for at least 60 ~~seconds~~minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent inactivates SVCV;

~~2)~~~~mechanically dried eviscerated fish that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 90°C for at least 60 seconds, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates SVCV;~~

~~3~~2)	fish *meal* that has been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least ~~90~~60°C for at least 60 ~~seconds~~minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates SVCV;

~~4~~3)	fish oil.

[...]

____________

WOAH *Aquatic Manual* 2025	8
Phantom 2 Vision + Mission Checklists

Arrival Checklist 1. If day and operating out of back of vehicle, point vehicle into sun 2. Remove case and place on level surface 3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or controlled airspace using smartphone or tablet app 4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver, to contact tower of field if closer than 5 NM 5. Inform tower / CTAF of UAS ops, location, and max height of flight Preflight Checklist 1. Remove transmitter 2. Router - On 3. Transmitter - On 4. Toggle Switches - Full Up 5. Video Monitor - On 6. Remove UAS from case 7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed 8. Micro-SD card - Inserted 9. UAS Battery - Inserted 10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and recovery position if it returns to home 1 1. UAS Battery - On 12. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified 13. DJI Application - Load 14. DJI application - Connect to Camera 15 . Camera - Full Up 16. Satellite Connections - Verified 17 . Charge Levels - Safe for Flight 18. Video Recording - Start 19 . Takeoff After Takeoff Checklist 1. Hover approximately ten feet above the ground to confirm UAS is under control 2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover - Verified Pre- Landing Checklist 1. Camera - Full Up 2. Video Recorder - Stop 3. Landing Zone – Clear / Safe Post-Landing Checklist - Returning to Flight Immediately 1. Battery - Remove & Replace 2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified 3. DJI application - Connect to Camera 4. Takeoff End of Ops Checklist 1. Battery - Off 2. Transmitter - Off 3 . Router - Off 4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
CHAPTER 1.3.**DISEASES LISTED BY THE OIE**

[...]

Article 1.3.3.

The following *diseases* of crustaceans are listed by the OIE:

‒	Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease

‒	Infection with *Aphanomyces**astaci* (crayfish plague)

‒	Infection with *Hepatobacter**penaei* (necrotising hepatopancreatitis)

‒	Infection with infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis virus

‒	Infection with infectious myonecrosis virus

‒	Infection with *Macrobrachium**rosenbergii* nodavirus (white tail disease)

‒	Infection with decapod iridescent virus 1

‒	Infection with Taura syndrome virus

‒	Infection with white spot syndrome virus

‒	Infection with yellow head virus genotype 1.

__________________________
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of
the Board of Directors and Director
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2005, and therelated condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It issubstantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on ourreview, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cashflows for the year then ended not presented herein and in our report dated September 12, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanyingcondensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. 

 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

November 8, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc. (the Company) for
the year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Jay N. Torok, Principal Financial Officer of the Company (see explanatory
note), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (3)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(4)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Jay N. TorokJay N. TorokChairman of the Board and
Principal Financial Officer January 18, 2005 This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. This certification is not being filed
as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document. Explanatory note: Ron OConnor resigned as Chief Financial Officer effective November 19, 2004.
Jerome L. Joseph was appointed Chief Financial Officer effective December 15, 2004. However,
because Mr. Joseph was not the Companys Chief Financial Officer for the period covered by this
report, Jay N. Torok has been by the Companys Board of Directors to act as the Principal Financial
Officer for purposes of filing this report
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002, 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of
Williams Controls, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
  Company.

|/s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAY         
|-----------------------------
|Dennis E.
      Bunday       
|Chief Financial
      Officer
|Williams Controls,
      Inc 
|December 11,
      2008      

67

---
FILIPPO TERESI, HUSBAND,

Appellant,

v.

SHERRI LEE TERESI, WIFE,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3239

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

Stephanie L. Murphy, of The Murphy Law Group, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Corrine A. Bylund, of Zisser, Brown, Nowlis & Cabrey, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the former husband, raises six issues in this appeal from a 

supplemental final judgment in a dissolution proceeding. Appellee, the former 
wife, concedes that the trial court erred in ordering her to pay retroactive child 

support for the parties’ remaining minor child only through July 2011 when the 

child turned 18 because the child did not graduate from high school until June 

2012. See §§ 61.13(1)(a)1.a., 743.07(2), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, on that issue, we 

reverse and remand for recalculation of the amount the former wife owed the 

former husband for retroactive child support through June 2012. On all of the 

other issues raised by the former husband, we affirm without discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with 

instructions.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

2
Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 23-Apr-2014 

# SOI Tax Stats - Corporation Tax Statistics Return to theTax Stats home page Corporate Returns OneSheet, 2011 (PDF) The OneSheet presents a project description, highlights of the data, and selected figures. Links to numerous articles and data providing statistics on income, deductions, credits and other taxes, as reported by corporations filing on Form 1120 (including 1120-A, 1120-L, 1120-PC, 1120- REIT, 1120-RIC, and more) and their associated schedules, can be found here. For an explanation of terms, a description of the sample and limitations of the data, links to recent revisions of select corporate tax forms and other information about the data, please visit the Corporation Metadata page. Featured Areas Statistical Tables Browse for articles and tables in a particular area of interest by choosing from the links below: Browse for tables spanning all areas of interest by choosing from the following links below:

• Integrated Business Data • Corporation Complete Report • Corporation Source Book • Corporation Research Credit • Corporate Schedule M-3 • Corporation Depreciation Data • Study Methodology and Limitations (pdf) • by Sector or Industry • by Type of Return • by Size

Publications Other IRS Data and Related Links Browse for articles and tables from the following publications: For data on tax administration and other taxes, choose from the links below:

• Early Data Releases • SOI Bulletin Articles • Publications and Papers • Estimated Corporation Data Line Counts • Collecting Revenue • Enforcing Laws • Issuing Refunds Return to theTax Stats home page 

### http://www.irs.gov/uac/SOI-Tax-Stats-Corporation-Tax-Statistics
# Annual Report