alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 778 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 14, 2016. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5053) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the 

Secretary of the Treasury from requiring that the identity of 

contributors to 501(c) organizations be included in annual returns. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means 

now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114– 

58 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and 

on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 

intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority mem-
2 

•HRES 778 EH 

ber of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. At any time after adoption of this resolution the 

Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare 

the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House 

on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 

5293) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and for other 

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate, the Committee of the 

Whole shall rise without motion. No further consideration of 

the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent 

order of the House. 

SEC. 3. Section 10002 of H.R. 5293 shall be considered 

to be a spending reduction account for purposes of section 

3(d) of House Resolution 5. 

SEC. 4. (a) During consideration of H.R. 5293, it shall 

not be in order to consider an amendment proposing both a 

decrease in an appropriation designated pursuant to section 

251(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Def-
3 

•HRES 778 EH 

icit Control Act of 1985 and an increase in an appropriation 

not so designated, or vice versa. 

(b) Subsection (a) shall not apply to an amendment between the Houses. 

SEC. 5. During consideration of H.R. 5293, section 3304 

of Senate Concurrent Resolution 11 shall not apply. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION 

SERVICE VETERINARY SERVICES

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS

1920 DAYTON AVENUE

AMES, IOWA 50010

CERTIFICADO DE LICENCIA E INSPECCIÓN

El Artículo I, Sección 8, Cláusula 18 de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos de Amèrica da autoridad al Congreso (EUA) para promulgar y poner en vigor

todas las leyes necesarias y propias. Una de esas leyes, el Virus-Serum-Toxin Act (21 U.S.C. 151-159), concede al Secretario de Agricultura (EUA) la 

autoridad de otorgar licencias e inspeccionar todo producto biológico ó diagnóstico veterinario distribuido en los Estados Unidos de America. Ningún 

producto inservible, peligroso, contaminado, o nocivo será dado licencia o distribuído.

Por este medio certifico que el siguiente facricante de productos biológicos o diagnóstico veterinario ha sido inspeccionado y otorgado una licencia bajo las

leyes y regulaciones de los Estados Unidos de America.

1. Nombre y Dirección del Fabricante 2. Número de Licencia (USDA) 3. Fecha de Emisión de Licencia

Por este medio certifico que el siguiente producto biológico veterinarario o diagnóstico veterinario ha sido inspeccionado (ensayado) y otorgado una licencia

de acuerdo con las leyes y regulaciones de los Estados Unidos de America y se encuentra en el mercado en estos momentos.

4. Nombre Propio del Producto 5. Nombre Comercial Producto dado por el Fabricante 6. Codigo USDA 7. Fecha de Emisión de

Licencia

Firma del Oficial Autorizado USDA

Titulo

Fecha de Firma

Número del certificado

APHIS FORM 2046-S

APR 2015

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 

a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to 

average .33 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and 

reviewing the collection of information.

OMB Approved

0579-0013

EXP: 02/2022
# C_2018182EN.01002302.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/23

---

Action brought on 24 January 2018 — Giove Gas v EUIPO — Primagaz (KALON AL CENTRO DELLA FAMIGLIA)

(Case T-34/18)

(2018/C 182/28)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giove Gas Srl (Tarquinia, Italy) (represented by: A. Bergonzini and F. Dinelli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘KALON AL CENTRO DELLA FAMIGLIA’ — Application for registration No 14 740 559

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2017 in Case R 1271/2017-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order the registration of the mark. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the registration of the mark.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Flotill Products Incorporated, Petitioner, and Buitoni Foods Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special and Trial Term, New York County,

May 5, 1959.

*Henry Edward Schultz (John J. Yellin*and *Roger A. Schultz*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Garfield, Clifford é Fagan*for respondent.

*500Irving H. Saypol, J.

Special Term on a motion to stay arbitration on the disputed question of the place of arbitration, i.e., New York or San Francisco, has referred the issue for trial as a question of fact.

The issue has been tried by the court without a jury and taken under advisement before completion of the proof on the premise that there is no issue of fact.

The court finds on a consideration of the documentary evidence that the proof is that the agreement of the parties is clear, there is no ambiguity and accordingly the question of intent and the meaning of the agreement of the parties poses no question of fact. Ultimate decision then is a matter of law *(O’Neil Supply Co.*v. *Petroleum Heat & Power Co.,*280 N. Y. 50, 55).

The agreement of the parties is evidenced by the exchanges of correspondence, Exhibits E, F and Gr at Special Term, which are petitioner’s Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 at the trial. Petitioner’s Exhibit 2, which is respondent’s letter of January 27, 1958, is confirmed by petitioner’s Exhibit 3, which is petitioner’s letter of February 24, 1958. Together these integrate the original contracts of 1956 which, in turn, integrate rules of the petitioner’s trade associations, particularly those of the National Canners Association. Altogether these documents call for arbitration. at the place nearest the location of the goods. Arbitration having been invoked initially by the respondent affecting some goods located in New Jersey, the question of the place of arbitration would seem to be entirely for the arbitrators *(Matter of Wetzler*[Equi-Flow], 16 Misc. 2d 524, citing *Matter of Paloma Frocks [Shamokin],*3 N. Y. 2d 572, 574; *Matter of Lipman, [Haeuser Shellac Co.],*289 N. Y. 76, 80; *Matter of Uraga Dock [Mediterranean S. S.],*6 A D 2d 443).

Let an order be settled reporting the foregoing to Special Term where the motion is now held in abeyance.
December 4, 1998

21398

#### Japan Tobacco Intern. Corp. v. Adisayathepkul

Vacated
# C_2019230EN.01005301.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/53

---

Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Ayuntamiento de Enguera v Commission

(Case T-602/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Grant agreement concluded under the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) - Reduction of the amount of the grant - Reclassification of the action - Refusal of the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 230/66)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ayuntamiento de Enguera (Enguera, Spain) (represented by: J. Palau Navarro, J. Ortiz Ballester and V. Soriano i Piqueras, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter of 26 July 2018 confirming its position on the reduction of the amount of the grant awarded under grant agreement LIFE10 ENV/ES/000458 and giving notice of the issue of a recovery order for the sum of EUR 113 408,05.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Ayuntamiento de Enguera shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ayuntamiento de Enguera shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: May 12, 2010
    By:

/s/
Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director
#### State v. Lagmay

17621

5/07/96

Reversed
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Zaremba,
      Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2006


/s/
      Richard Zaremba


Richard
      Zaremba


Senior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,


Treasurer
      and Secretary




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained by
      MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
63 P.3d 434

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

January 23, 2003

24329

#### Noble v. State

Affirmed
AAM

- 1 3

- 3 44

- E May 20, 2013

Exemption No. 10774 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 3 86

Mr. Martin Coyne Executive Helicopters 1334 North Imperial Avenue El Centro, CA 92243

Dear M r

. Coyne :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Dec ision

By letter dated April 23 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Executive Helicopters for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Executive He licopters to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Executive Helicopters

.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public i nterest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reaso ns for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 ;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also appl y to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Executive Helicopters an exemptio n from 14 CFR
part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Executive Helicopters to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program , subj ect to the conditions and

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employ ees of Executive Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of

the Executive Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30 , 201 6 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser , M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26849]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2024-006]


Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress; Meeting

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing an upcoming meeting of the Advisory 
Committee on the Records of Congress in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. The committee advises NARA on the full range of 
programs, policies, and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives 
in the Office of Legislative Archives, Presidential Libraries, and 
Museum Services (LPM).

DATES: The meeting will be on December 11, 2023, from 10:15 a.m. to 12 
p.m. EST.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Wyatt, National Archives, Center 
for Legislative Archives, by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e341f131b0d5029071f0a0a3e101f0c1f50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="195378747c6a374e60786d6d5977786b78377e766f">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone 
at 202-357-5016.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This virtual meeting is open to the public 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) 
and implementing regulations.

Meeting Information

    Meeting link: https://senate.webex.com/senate/j.php?MTID=m38e2fe7a06180f990a755cfa41ede3c3.
    Meeting number: 2762 958 2435.
    Meeting password: SrM6Gavpw87.
    Join from a video or application: Dial 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5062676662696568626463651023353e3124357e27353235287e333f3d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90a2a7a6a2a9a5a8a2a4a3a5d0e3f5fef1e4f5bee7f5f2f5e8bef3fffd">[email protected]</span></a>.
    You can also dial 207.182.190.20 and enter your meeting number.
    Join by phone: +1 202-228-0808 US Senate Webex, +1 855-428-0808 US 
Senate Webex (Toll Free).
    Access code: 27629582435.
    Global call-in numbers: https://senate.webex.com/senate/globalcallin.php?MTID=mcf8e47615656e2926077acf6cd6ff1d5.

Agenda

1. Opening Remarks--Ann Berry, Secretary of the Senate
2. Recognition of Co-Chair--Kevin McCumber, Acting Clerk of the House
3. Recognition of the Archivist of the United States--Colleen Shogan
4. Approval of the Minutes of the Last Meeting
5. Senate Archivist's Report--Karen Paul
6. House Archivist's Report--Heather Bourk
7. Center for Legislative Archives Report--Richard Hunt
8. Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress Seventh Report--Karen 
Paul
9. New Business
10. Adjournment

Tasha Ford,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-26849 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2021062EN.01002501.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Fakro v Commission

(Case T-515/18) (1)

(Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Market for roof windows and flashings - Decision rejecting a complaint - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 - Access to the file - Principle of sound administration - Reasonable period - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - No EU interest - Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement - Predatory pricing - ‘Fighting brands’ - Rebates - Exclusivity)

(2021/C 62/30)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Fakro sp. z o.o. (Nowy Sącz, Poland) (represented by: A. Radkowiak-Macuda and Z. Kiedacz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Farley, I. Rogalski and J. Szczodrowski, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Wiącek and M. Rzotkiewicz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 3864 final of 14 June 2018 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant alleging infringements of Article 102 TFEU in the market for roof windows and flashings (Case AT.40026 — Velux).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fakro sp. z o.o., the European Commission and the Republic of Poland to each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fakro sp. z o.o., the European Commission and the Republic of Poland to each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27603]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Defense Electronics Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 11, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Defense Electronics 
Consortium (``DEC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Specifically, Della Systems, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY; Eagle Circuits, 
Inc., Dallas, TX; Intrinsix Corp., Marlborough, MA; and Northrop 
Grumman Systems Corp., Linthicum, MD have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DEC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 12, 2023, DEC filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 
8, 2023 (88 FR 53520).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 14, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 27, 2023 (88 FR 66507).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27603 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```