alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


I, Carmine T. Oliva, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-K of EMRISE Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant
     to SEC Release 34-47986] for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

        (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];

        (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2006


/s/ CARMINE T OLIVA
-------------------
Carmine T. Oliva
Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
18687

#### State v. Rarogal

Affirmed
# C_2018301EN.01001501.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juge d’instruction du tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) lodged on 13 June 2018 — Criminal proceedings against YA and AIRBNB Ireland UC — other parties: Hotelière Turenne SAS, Pour un hébergement et tourisme professionnel (AHTOP), Valhotel

(Case C-390/18)

(2018/C 301/20)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Juge d’instruction du tribunal de grande instance de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

YA and AIRBNB Ireland UC

Other parties: Hotelière Turenne SAS, Pour un hébergement et tourisme professionnel (AHTOP), Valhotel

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the services provided in France by the company Airbnb Ireland UC via an electronic platform managed from Ireland benefit from the freedom to provide services contemplated in Article 3 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the services provided in France by the company Airbnb Ireland UC via an electronic platform managed from Ireland benefit from the freedom to provide services contemplated in Article 3 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000? (1)

| 2. | Are the restrictive rules relating to the exercise of the profession of real estate agent in France, laid down by Law No 70-9 of 2 January 1970 on intermediaries in real-estate transactions (‘the Hoguet Law’), enforceable against the company Airbnb Ireland UC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are the restrictive rules relating to the exercise of the profession of real estate agent in France, laid down by Law No 70-9 of 2 January 1970 on intermediaries in real-estate transactions (‘the Hoguet Law’), enforceable against the company Airbnb Ireland UC?

---

(1)  Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) (OJ 2000 L 178, p. 1).

---
Chapter 2.4.4. – Infection with Marteilia refringens

Annex 23. Item 6.5.3. – Article 10.7.3. of Chapter 10.7. ‘Infection with KHV’

CHAPTER 10.7.

INFECTION WITH KOI HERPESVIRUS

[...]

Article 10.7.3.

Measures for the importation or transit of aquatic animal products for any purpose regardless of the infection with KHV status of the exporting country, zone or compartment

The *aquatic animal products*listed below have been assessed as meeting the criteria for safety of *aquatic animal**products*in accordance with Article 5.4.1. When authorising the importation or transit of these *aquatic**animal**products*, *Competent**Authorities*should not require any *sanitary**measures*related to KHV, regardless of the KHV status of the *exporting**country*, *zone*or *compartment*:

1)	*aquatic**animal**products* that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 50°C for at least ~~three~~one minute~~s~~, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates KHV;

~~2)~~~~mechanically dried eviscerated fish that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 50°C for at least three minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates KHV;~~

~~3~~2)	fish *meal* that has been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 50°C for at least ~~three~~one minute~~s~~, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates KHV;

~~4~~3)	fish oil.

[...]

____________

WOAH *Aquatic Manual* 2025	8
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 27, 2023 No. 04-22-00595-CR EX PARTE Jose Angel ALVARADO CALDERON From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10399CR Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On January 25, 2023, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an extension of time to file appellant’s reply brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due no later than March 1, 2023. Further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.
It is so ORDERED on January 27, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 748 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that United States 

law firms should not represent Iran in any judicial proceeding or other 

capacity to assist efforts of Iran to avoid paying compensation to victims 

of Iran-sponsored terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2016 

Mr. JONES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

United States law firms should not represent Iran in 

any judicial proceeding or other capacity to assist efforts 

of Iran to avoid paying compensation to victims of Iransponsored terrorism. 

Whereas Iran has sponsored terrorism, including the 1996 

Khobar Towers attacks, the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon, the 1998 attacks on two United States 

Embassies in Africa, a 1990 assassination in New York 

City, and various other attacks; 

Whereas the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon 

killed 220 Marines of the 1st Battalion, 8th Marines 

based in Camp Lejeune; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 748 IH 

Whereas section 502 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria 

Human Rights Act of 2012 allows assets of Iran held in 

the United States to be available for paying judgments 

relating to Iran-sponsored terrorism; and 

Whereas United States law firms represented Iran in Bank 

Markazi v. Peterson before the United States Supreme 

Court thus assisting efforts of Iran to avoid paying compensation to victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that United States law firms should not rep3 resent Iran in any judicial proceeding or other capacity 

4 to assist efforts of Iran to avoid paying compensation to 

5 victims of Iran-sponsored terrorism. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2020095EN.01002401.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2020 — Stada Arzneimittel AG v EUIPO (ViruProtect)

(Case T-487/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark ViruProtect - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Duty to state reasons)

(2020/C 95/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2018 (Case R 1886/2017-5), relating to an application for registration of the word sign ViruProtect as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Stada Arzneimittel AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stada Arzneimittel AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                 <C>             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS           3-MOS           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000     DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       APR-1-2000      APR-1-1999     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000     JUN-30-1999     DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1               1               1
<CASH>                                7,081,653      37,389,965       8,084,402
<SECURITIES>                                  0               0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        45,231,963      48,319,142      44,504,619
<ALLOWANCES>                         (6,533,672)     (2,820,675)     (6,524,067)
<INVENTORY>                                   0               0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     58,223,885      92,182,631      65,103,315
<PP&E>                              317,716,380     289,941,641     287,546,035
<DEPRECIATION>                      (16,223,368)     (8,136,189)    (10,959,520)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      449,313,797     488,227,332     439,621,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                72,925,683      27,458,657      58,908,762
<BONDS>                             190,389,200     288,906,807     191,527,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0               0               0
<PREFERRED>                              71,000          71,000          71,000
<COMMON>                                928,175         901,878         923,830
<OTHER-SE>                           24,689,216     122,513,378      55,593,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        449,313,797     488,227,332     439,621,237
<SALES>                              39,504,009      49,137,289     184,929,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     39,504,009      49,137,289     184,929,131
<CGS>                                         0               0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        37,077,640      36,188,295     151,236,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     11,598,938       8,719,655      37,478,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0               0      48,028,047
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    7,571,855       4,725,544      18,779,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (16,674,038)      1,622,473     (63,628,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                            533,569         640,877       1,552,304
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (17,207,607)        981,596     (65,180,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0               0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0               0               0
<CHANGES>                                     0               0               0
<NET-INCOME>                        (17,209,382)        979,821     (65,187,553)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.93)           0.05           (3.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.93)           0.05           (3.63)



</TABLE>
1

Phc39.doc Public Hearing

9th Floor Conference Room L & C Annex

401 Church Street

Nashville, TN 37243

- 1531

9:30 A.M.

February 28, 2013

Hearing Officer: Malcolm Butler

Division of Air Pollution Control

Representatives: Linda Bilbrey (Recording Secretary) AP C

Haidar Alrawi

Other Divisions: Resources

Management Bureau

Public Mr. Joseph Bo li a Exide



### Comment Summary

This public hearing has been called to consider the requirements for developing a federally enforceable State

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Lead (Pb) Nonattainment Area (NAA) within Sullivan County.

Oral Comments: None presented.

Written Comments: Only one written comment submitted by

Mr. Jerry W. Wheeler , President

Exide C ommunity Homeowners Association

Commenter : M r. Jerry W. Wheeler, President

Exide Community Homeowners Association

Comment: “I am responding to the recent notice published in the Bristol Herald Courier regarding

the February 28 th hearing reference Exide Technologies (Exide), Sullivan County,

T ennessee. Though I welcome economic advantages to the community, I urge you to

become well aware of environmental concerns in our area, including, but not limited to,

ambient air. We have additional concerns involving water, soil, structural fires and he alth.

As you are aware , lead is a continual hazard concern. We urge you to consider our

community in all your findings and your decisions. Your proceedings should include

Exide’s past and current violations and/or non

- compliance of laws, rules and

regu lations.”

Response: Based on the most recent 2010

- 2012 lead (Pb) monitoring data, the Bristol partial

nonattainment area, which is centered around the Exide facility, has attained the lead

NAAQS. This area is now considered attainment and hence ambient impacts of the Exide

lead emissions are in compliance with the state and federal national standards , which

include a margin of safety for human health considerations. Issues regarding

Exide’s continual compliance with its permitting requirements are be yond the scope of

this emission inventory SIP requirement and are address ed in our Division on a

continuous basis through our permitting and enforcement programs.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dayton Superior Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    [Omitted]4.
    
    [Omitted]5.
    
    [Omitted]
 April 1, 2009
    
    /s/Edward J. PuisisEdward J. PuisisExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and RUSSELL , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Michael A. OLIVEIRA Private First Class (E

- 2 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201900171
Decided: 30 October 2019

. Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Mi litary Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN . Sentence adjudge d 20 March 2019 by a speci al court

- martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap

- Bangor , Silverdale, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alon e . Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 10 months , 1 and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Kevin R. Larson , JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This o pinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)
.

_________________________

1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 9 months pursuant to a pretrial agreement.United States v. Oliveira , No. 201 90017 1

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the finding s and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the a ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,039,962
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,261,642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                254,171
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .003
        

</TABLE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-31425,  333- 40603,  and  333-50265  on Form S-3 and  333-11549,  333-25925,
333-37137,  and 333-74769 on Form S-8 of fonixTM corporation of our report dated
March 28,  1997,  appearing  in this  amended  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A of
fonixTM corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
August 10, 1999
# C_2019328EN.01005501.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/55

---

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2019 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac)

(Case T-662/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark twistpac - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty of care - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2019/C 328/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: romwell GmbH & Co. KG (Breitscheidt, Germany) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2018 (Case R 336/2018-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign twistpac as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | romwell GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

romwell GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.

---
# C_2019044EN.01008203.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/82

---

Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Wirecard v EUIPO — AXA Banque (boon.)

(Case T-2/18) (1)

(2019/C 44/113)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.

---
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Hanover Foods
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 2, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge, the undersigned, in my capacity as set
forth below, hereby certifies that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



  /s/   John A. Warehime, Chief Executive Officer       Date: September 3, 2002
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Records Management, Quality Assurance of Inspection and 

Compliance Outgoing Correspondence via NCAH Portal

CVB-WI-0045 02

PIMSWI0045.01

CVB-WI-PIMS

13 Dec 2022

CVB-Released
18957

#### Tauala v. Chandler

Affirmed
July 6, 2004

24287

#### State v. Barnett

Affirmed