alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**USA COMMENTS IN RED FONT**

**Annex 38. Item 11.2.1. – Section 2.2.1. and 2.2.2. of Chapter 2.4.5. Infection with *P. marinus***

CHAPTER 2.4.5.INFECTION WITH *PERKINSUS MARINUS*

[...]

2.2.	Host factors

2.2.1.	Susceptible host species

~~Eastern oyster, *Crassostrea virginica*; Pacific oyster, *C. gigas*; suminoe oyster, *C. ariakensis;*mangrove oyster,*C. rhizophorae*; Cortez oyster, *C. corteziensis*(Andrews 1996; Calvo *et al.,* 1999; Calvo *et al.,* 2001; Villalba *et al.,* 2004; Cáceres-Martínez *et al.,* 2008); softshell clam, *Mya arenaria*; Baltic macoma, *Macoma balthica* (Dungan *et al.,* 2007).~~

Species that fulfill the criteria for listing as susceptible to infection with *Perkinsus marinus* according to Chapter 1.5. of the *Aquatic Animal Health Code* (*Aquatic Code*) are: American cupped oyster (*Crassostrea virginica*), Ariake cupped oyster (*Magallana* [Syn. *Crassostrea*] *ariakensis*), Cortez oyster (*Crassostrea corteziensis*) and palmate oyster (*Saccostrea palmula*).

**RATIONALE: Grammatical correction.**

~~2.2.2.	Susceptible stages of the host Species with incomplete evidence for susceptibility~~

~~All stages after settlement are susceptible.~~

~~Species for which there is incomplete evidence to fulfill the criteria for listing as susceptible to infection with *P. marinus* according to Chapter 1.5. of the *Aquatic Code* are: Gasar cupped oyster (*Crassostrea tulipa*), mangrove cupped oyster (*Crassostrea rhizophorae),* and Pacific cupped oyster (*Magallana*[Syn. *Crassostrea*] *gigas*).****~~

~~In addition, pathogen-specific positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results have been reported in the following species, but no active infection has been demonstrated: Columbia black oyster (*Crassostrea columbiensis*), soft shell clam (*Mya arenaria*), and stone oyster (*Striostrea prismatica*).~~****

**RATIONALE:** WOAH should not list species for which there is incomplete evidence for susceptibility If there is incomplete evidence for susceptibility, it is inappropriate to impose trade barriers on these species.  By listing them, the opportunity for trade barriers to be imposed inappropriately is heightened.  WOAH should only list species for which there is sound evidence of susceptibility and countries should impose restrictions only in those cases.  It is not appropriate for a country to require testing for a disease for which there is incomplete evidence of susceptibility.

____________________________
19718

#### State v. Munoz

Affirmed
Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year 27-Apr-21

Page 1 of 2

Region: * Fiscal Year: 2019

State: * Classes: *

Org/Cust ID Number: Pain Type: ALL_PAINTYPES

All Other Covered 

Species

Cats Dogs Guinea Pigs Hamsters Nonhuman 

Primates

Pig Rabbits Sheep Total

AK 377 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 377

AL 2,656 182 877 54 138 575 575 491 21 5,569

AR 103 28 302 4 2 191 1,371 514 0 2,515

AZ 1,722 464 767 9 135 40 358 223 171 3,889

CA 19,687 711 1,695 6,955 732 4,225 5,703 21,303 1,327 62,338

CO 2,952 368 910 1,546 205 1 934 952 805 8,673

CT 586 17 178 130 329 244 236 211 0 1,931

DC 10,495 7 25 435 20 137 287 131 3 11,540

DE 654 88 113 20 0 0 17 5,910 34 6,836

FL 2,328 380 665 96 0 844 1,011 79 161 5,564

GA 4,932 460 1,458 868 4,033 1,568 597 2,534 96 16,546

HI 229 162 197 0 0 0 38 13 14 653

IA 3,544 413 471 770 2,149 6 1,043 430 448 9,274

ID 246 9 11 8 134 0 0 18 8 434

IL 2,005 836 2,563 1,528 664 614 1,550 1,758 182 11,700

IN 5,193 287 1,614 776 14,936 239 683 2,389 44 26,161

KS 22,101 3,035 9,759 5,881 24,447 1,596 3,409 5,195 879 76,302

KY 599 199 248 0 80 28 405 55 67 1,681

LA 1,084 708 760 26 0 1,336 86 6,348 56 10,404

MA 7,171 603 9,279 22,876 3,224 16,573 7,028 17,581 463 84,798

MD 6,044 35 621 8,272 2,560 7,518 1,633 3,633 168 30,484

ME 471 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 523

MI 1,087 189 788 17,915 32 419 527 2,181 436 23,574

MN 898 292 1,010 29,948 1,881 169 3,570 4,969 883 43,620

MO 644 1,190 2,423 2,348 9,949 231 2,868 1,118 138 20,909

Total number of animals research facilities used in regulated activities (Column F = Column 

C + Column D + Column E)
MS 159

0 32 70 13 105 57 209 23 668

MT 692

1000 12000 705

NC 5,684 778 1,357 4,982 607 1,063 2,961 5,873 179 23,484

ND 190 125 130200 38 20 10 515

NE 1,133 56 202 10 659 168 151 60 58 2,497

NH 62400000 117 260 767

NJ 1,345 873 3,547 18,177 25,328 2,525 387 9,704

9 61,895

NM 400 373 15 27 339 156 174

0 1,124

NV 376 108 5367 540 114 24

0 1,219

NY 9,242 643 1,051 3,398 1,102 1,400 1,254 2,967 983 22,040

OH 2,222 1,533 2,147 43,872 965 461 2,070 8,783 247 62,300

OK 1,167 216 523 1,976

0 131 50 505 58 4,626

OR 1,618 16 17 2192 2,210 225 47 295 4,649

PA 6,393 1,360 2,733 1,634 452 1,872 1,953 15,184 1,159 32,740

PR03 42

00 4,4738 73

0 4,599

RI 1272 20 29 262 33 77 4950 1,045

SC 1,470 165 236 121 64 394 160 839 2,702

SD 1,5710 20 86

340 142 1,700

TN 2,106 334 800 165 540 90 675 110

5 4,825

TX 7,377 433 1,144 1,451 1,764 3,895 2,718 4,360 423 23,565

UT 682 167 269 169 473 23 235 801 177 2,996

VA 8,103 32 207 377 68 69 1,407 363 250 10,876

VT 164 45 15 14000 12 3,146 3,396

WA 11,941 158 531 2,463 16 3,654 487 453 24 19,727

WI 2,538 403 5,692 2,288 238 8,782 1,529 13,979 264 35,713

WV 31 137 1210

600 64 121 480

WY 214 19 32330 191 107 398

REPORT 

TOTAL

165,017 18,270 58,511 181,993 98,296 68,257 50,777 142,472 13,953 797,546
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Initial Accreditation Training (IAT)

Last Modified: 

Print

Veterinarians applying for veterinary accreditation as well as those seeking to attend

an Orientation Program will need to have completed Initial Accreditation Training

(IAT). 

IAT is web-based and is composed of an Introduction followed by three Veterinary

Accreditation Lessons, four Emerging and Exotic Diseases of Animals Lessons, and

seven Transboundary Disease Incursions. The lessons and incursions each have a

corresponding multiple-choice quiz. A passing score of 80 percent on each of the 14

quizzes is required to earn an IAT Certificate of Completion. 

An IAT Certificate of Completion earned in the IAT web course is required for

admission to the Orientation Program. Both IAT and the Orientation Program must

be completed in order to apply for accreditation.

For graduate and licensed veterinarians who have already received their

degrees from a U.S. or foreign school or college of veterinary medicine and

who are seeking veterinary accreditation for the first time, IAT is available

only through the NVAP Coordinator in the State where accreditation is sought. (To

look up contact information, use the dropdown menu at the bottom of this page.)

For students currently enrolled or matriculated in a U.S. school or college

of veterinary medicine, IAT is incorporated into the regulatory or foreign animal
disease curricula. Veterinary students can access the course content through the

Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges.

Contact Us

NVAP Coordinators

For questions about NVAP, contact your local NVAP Coordinator by selecting your

State or Territory from the dropdown menu below or visit More Information About

NVAP.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

All Contacts

Export requirements frequently change. Obtain current export requirements for live

animals or animal products before each shipment.
**Exhibit 10.31**

 

**New Hire Option Grant Authorization – UpdatedAppendix**

 

**Awards Granted Under the New Hire Plan***

 

The Company has made the following option grants under its New HireOption Grant Authorization Plan (the “New Hire Plan”).  In 2004, the Company granted threenon-executive officer employees a total of 16,000 stock options with a grantprice of $14.90, one non-executive officer employee a total of 200,000 stockoptions with a grant price of $15.71, four non-executive officer employees atotal of 26,500 options with a grant price of $16.72, 14 non-executive officeremployees a total of  21,000 options witha grant price of $17.56 and 4 non-executive officer employees a total of 60,000options with a grant price of $16.94.  In2003, the Company granted sixteen non-executive officer employees a total of97,000 stock options with a grant price of $12.79 and one non-executive officeremployee 75,000 options with a grant price of $15.99.  In 2002, the Company granted sixnon-executive officer employees a total of 235,000 stock options with a grantprice of $6.71.  In 2001, the Companygranted the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, 300,000 stockoptions with a grant price of $9.62. This summary does not include grants madeto individuals who are no longer with the Company and whose options have beenforfeited.

 

With the exception of the 2004 option grants with grant prices of$17.56 and $16.94, all stock options granted under the New Hire Plan vest asfollows: (i) twenty-five percent (25%) of the options become exercisableon the first anniversary of date of grant and (ii) the remainingseventy-five (75%) become exercisable pro rata over the following 3 yearperiod, on a monthly basis, commencing on the first anniversary of the date ofgrant and ending on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant; provided that,in no event shall any option be exercisable following the expiration ortermination of the option.  The 2004option grants, with grant prices of $17.56 and $16.94, vest on December 31,2004, however, the right to sell the options accrues only as follows: (i)one-third of the options shall become eligible for sale on the firstanniversary of date of grant, (ii) one-third of the options shall becomeeligible for sale on the second anniversary of date of grant and (iii) theremaining one-third of the options shall become eligible for sale on the thirdanniversary of date of grant.

 

----

* This Updated Appendix does not include information regarding grantsmade to individuals who are no longer employees of the Company.

 

----
November 23, 1998

20566

#### Yamashiro v. United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             156
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (160)
<INVENTORY>                                        103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,769
<PP&E>                                           1,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,596)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,290
<OTHER-SE>                                       (605)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,091
<SALES>                                          5,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,470
<CGS>                                            4,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (70)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (822)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (822)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
#### State v. Prudholm

18784

3/10/97

Vacated and Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,691,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              567,354,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   664,000
<INVENTORY>                                215,861,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           791,242,000
<PP&E>                                      20,852,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,017,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             804,077,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      223,899,000
<BONDS>                                    286,990,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 293,160,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               804,077,000
<SALES>                                    165,566,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           165,566,000
<CGS>                                       13,338,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,338,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            63,985,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            19,463,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,917,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             47,863,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                21,439,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                26,424,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year 27-Apr-21

Total number of animals research facilities used in regulated activities (Column E) Page 1 of 2

Region: * Fiscal Year: 2019

State: * Classes: *

Org/Cust ID Number: Pain Type: ALL_PAINTYPES

All Other 

Covered 

Species

Cats Dogs Guinea Pigs Hamsters Nonhuman 

Primates

Pig Rabbits Sheep Total

AK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AL 95 0 0 0 0 79 0 4 0 178

AR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CA 306 0 0 198 0 0 11 359 0 874

CO 106 22 73 289 74 0 0 11 5 580

CT 0 0 2 0 276 0 0 0 0 278

DC 643 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 643

DE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FL 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 236

GA 295 0 0 12 1,722 1 43 4 0 2,077

HI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

IA 84 0 0 82 574 0 0 0 11 751

ID 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

IL 117 0 3 6 0 0 63 58 0 247

IN 8 0 15 0 4,831 0 3 211 0 5,068

KS 384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 384

KY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LA 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9

MA 115 0 2 851 76 1 77 75 0 1,197

MD 133 0 0 938 341 562 198 253 4 2,429

ME 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MI 0 0 0 8,392 0 3 14 2 38 8,449

MN 0 0 4 57 106 1 0 6 0 174
MO

01 12 708 6,247 48000 7,016

MS500

000000

5

MT0

0000000

00

NC 5200 915 740000 1,041

ND00

00000000

NE0000

0000 17 17

NH0000000000

NJ 960 86 4,580 5,198 16

1 4890 10,466

NM00 90 15

0 98 48 300 281

NV0000000000

NY 3370 32 1,200 66

4 65 66 20 1,790

OH 700 18 696

0 82 164 1480 1,178

OK 72000008 3750 455

OR 94

00000000 94

PA 7354 3840 42 645 113

0 1,266

PR0000000000

RI00

00000000

SC0000000000

SD10 20 8600000 107

TN30

00 72000

0 75

TX 40300 437 226 283 47 300 1,426

UT000 119 1080000 227

VA000008 75 1720 255

VT000000

0000

WA 2400000000 24

WI 12000000000 120

WV0000000000

WY000000

0000

REPORT 

TOTAL

3,886 28 361 19,965 19,991 1,228 1,462 2,406 95 49,422
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-33708, 333-36556, 333-83934, 333-100337, 333-100399, 333-100400, 333-101041,
333-105060, 333-107191, 333-107776, 333-107777, 333-108560, 333-109593,
333-112783, 333-118687, and 333-120548 on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-34451, 33-53010,
33-65061, 333-06503, 333-06505, 333-06507, 333-06511, 333-90323, 333-31294,
333-55068, 333-61822, 333-62604, 333-74890, 333-96663, 333-104532, 333-104533,
333-105059, 333-107778, 333-112514, 333-115638, and 333-115639 on Form S-8 of
our reports dated March 28, 2005, relating to the financial statements of Zix
Corporation, and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zix
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004 /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2005
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Merricks, Appellant.

(No. 32010

Decided January 25, 1950.)

*Mr. Rodney R. Blake,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Carroll 7. Lewis,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Brookes, Capelle <£> Young,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taft, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
19233

#### Poe v. Rezentes

February 21, 1997

Order No. 97-18

Affirmed
18346

#### Joslin v. Liberty House, Inc.

January 28, 1997

Order No. 97-9

Affirmed in part, reversed in part
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 23, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-286

Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-7905 SP & 20-251AP

________________

Progressive American Insurance Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Columna Inc./Thomas Roush, M.D., a/a/o Andrea Mejia,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michaelle 

Gonzalez-Paulson, Judge.

deBeaubien, Simmons, Knight, Mantzaris & Neal, LLP, and Kenneth 

P. Hazouri (Orlando), for appellant.

Landau & Associates, P.A., and Todd A. Landau and Matthew 

Emanuel (Sunrise), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Appellant Progressive American Insurance Company (“Progressive”), 

the defendant below, challenges a final summary judgment entered in favor 

of appellee, plaintiff below, Columna Inc./Thomas Roush, M.D, a health care 

provider that was assigned the personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits of 

Progressive’s Insured, Andrea Mejia. The parties’ competing summary 

judgment motions were heard by the trial court on July 27, 2020, and, in 

reliance upon Geico v. Accident & Injury Clinic Inc., 290 So. 3d 980 (Fla. 5th 

DCA 2019), the trial court determined that Progressive was required to pay 

80% of the amount adopted in the statutory fee schedule,1 rather than 80% 

of the amount billed by appellee.

Neither the trial court, nor the parties, though, had the benefit of the 

Florida Supreme Court’s recent opinion in MRI Associates of Tampa, Inc. v. 

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 46 Fla. L. Weekly S379, 2021 

WL 5832298 (Fla. Dec. 9, 2021) (“MRI”). Although we employ a de novo

standard of review when reviewing a trial court’s adjudication of a summary 

judgment motion pertaining to an interpretation of the PIP statute,

2 we prefer 

here to allow the trial court, in the first instance, to adjudicate the parties’ 

1 See § 627.736(5)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2018).

2 Rivera v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 317 So. 3d 197, 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2021).
3

competing motions in light of MRI,

3 and we express no opinion on the merits 

of those motions. We, therefore, reverse the challenged judgment and 

remand for the trial court to consider the parties’ competing motions in light 

of MRI.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

3 See e.g. Alvarez v. Food Lion, Inc., 805 So. 2d 1032, 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2001); HJC Corp. v. Gallardo, 3D20-1837, 2022 WL 790278 (Fla. 3d DCA 

Mar. 16, 2022).
#### State v. Lau

20636

6/4/98

Affirmed
#### Shewanda R.M. PRICE, Plaintiff, v. HOUSE OF RUTH, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 17-1623 (UNA)

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Filed 08/29/2017

Signed 8/25/2017

Shewanda R.M. Price, Washington, DC, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amy Berman Jackson, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff files “this Class A Federal Human Rights [Diplomatic Immunity Business Enterprise Entrepreneur Buildings Builder Architect Contractor ... Workman Compensation Lawsuit” in order to collect $ 5 trillion in punitive damages from the House of Ruth.

Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The complaint does not articulate a claim arising under the United States Constitution or federal law; there*89fore, the plaintiff does not raise a federal question. Furthermore, because the plaintiff does not demonstrate that the parties are citizens of different states, the plaintiff also fails to establish diversity jurisdiction.

The Court will grant plaintiffs application to proceed *in forma pauperis*and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order is issued separately.
June 12, 1997

18734

#### Eggers v. Child Support Enforcement Agency of the State

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-44490, 333-65738, 333-67636 and 333-112037 onForms S-8, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-109188 on Form S-3, AmendmentNo. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-114256 on Form S-3, and Registration StatementsNos. 333-83552 and 333-84650 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 15, 2005 (which reportexpresses and unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating tochanges in the methods of accounting for asset retirement obligations and employeestock-based compensation in 2003 as required by Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” and Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation– Transition and Disclosure, and Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123",respectively), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. and management’s report of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
#### Werner v. Roberts

20841

1/27/99

Affirmed, Vacated & Remanded in part