alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas E. GRATTAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mary GRATTAN, Defendant in Error.

No. 37401.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 19, 1957.

*542Laynie W. Harrod, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Miskovsky & Miskovsky, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

HALLEY, Justice.

Mary M. Grattan, plaintiff, and Thomas E. Grattan, defendant, were divorced on the 14th day of May, 1954, in the District Court of Oklahoma County. Parties will be referred to as they appeared in that court. Under the terms of the decree of divorce the plaintiff was awarded, among other items, alimony in the sum of two thousand dollars. The defendant failed to pay this cash award of alimony. The defendant was properly cited for contempt and the matter was heard without a jury on February 6, 1956. Evidence was offered by both plaintiff and defendant, after which the defendant was found guilty of indirect contempt and sentenced to one hundred and eighty days in the County Jail of Oklahoma County unless he purged himself of contempt by paying the two thousand dollars alimony award and court costs. The defendant has appealed.

In the original divorce action no appeal was taken from the judgment of the trial court. Defendant claimed he had paid the alimony award but he failed to prove this either to the satisfaction of the trial court or to this Court after we have weighed the evidence. Under the evidence the defendant has made no effort to comply with the court’s judgment. We do not think that the defendant has proven that he was unable to pay the alimony judgment. It has long been settled in this State that one may receive a jail sentence for indirect contempt for failure to pay an alimony award. Wells v. Wells, 46 Okl. 88, 148 P. 723; Ex parte Bighorse, 178 Okl. 218, 62 P.2d 487.

Judgment will be affirmed.

WELCH, C. J., and DAVISON, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.
# C_2018436EN.01001502.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiliul Național de Soluționare a Contestațiilor (Romania) lodged on 30 May 2018 — SC Beny Alex SRL v Organizația Utilizatorilor de Apă pentru Irigații (OUAI) Săveni

(Case C-353/18)

(2018/C 436/19)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Consiliul Național de Soluționare a Contestațiilor

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant-Objector: SC Beny Alex SRL

Contracting entity: Organizația Utilizatorilor de Apă pentru Irigații (OUAI) Săveni

By order of 17 October 2018, the Court (Eighth Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling to be manifestly inadmissible.

---
Las especies invasoras compiten con las especies autóctonas por la comida, 

el espacio y los recursos. Como no siempre tienen depredadores naturales, 

el número de las mismas puede llegar a ser muy alto si no se monitorea.

Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección de Salud de Animales y Plantas

PLAGASHAMBRIENTAS.COM

¿Qué Puede Hacer Usted? Hay muchas 

maneras en que usted puede ayudar a 

detener la propagación de las especies 

invasoras, sin importar dónde usted viva:

previniendo su entrada, en primer lugar. 

No mueva plantas vivas, productos 

frescos o material vegetal de un 

estado a otro o a los Estados Unidos 

desde el extranjero.

Propague el mensaje, no las plagas. 

Hábleles a sus amigos y vecinos sobre 

las plagas hambrientas. Para más información, visite:

El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece igualdad de oportunidades.

Publicado en abril de 2012 

Material para el programa núm. 2115

El medio ambiente. Estas plagas hambrientas se alimentan vorazmente de, 

e infestan, nuestra agricultura, dañan nuestros parques y bosques, destrozan 

nuestros huertos y violentan el equilibrio de nuestro ecosistema. Pueden 

desplazar a las especies autóctonas, reducir la diversidad biológica y 

alterar la frecuencia y la intensidad de los incendios forestales. 

No sólo hacen daño a las plantas y cultivos, sino que además 

algunas plagas pueden resultar peligrosas para la salud de 

los humanos.

La economía. Según ciertos cálculos, el costo de las especies 

invasoras excede los mil millones de dólares al año en los 

Estados Unidos debido a la pérdida de ingresos y los 

costos de manejo. Los agricultores pierden sus cultivos,

los precios de los bienes y los productos suben y las 

cuarentenas que otros estados o países les imponen 

a nuestras exportaciones agrícolas pueden tener 

un efecto devastador.

“¡QUÉ BONITO

EL ESTADO

EN QUE VIVES.

ME LO PODRÍA

COMER ENTERO!”
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 800 

Expressing support for Lunchtime Music on the Mall in the Nation’s capital 

to benefit the District of Columbia and regional residents as well as 

visitors and honor the public service of the performers and partners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2016 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for Lunchtime Music on the Mall in 

the Nation’s capital to benefit the District of Columbia 

and regional residents as well as visitors and honor the 

public service of the performers and partners. 

Whereas the National Mall Revitalization and Designation 

Act seeks to enliven the National Mall for residents and 

visitors; 

Whereas the National Park Service, Washington Metropolitan 

Area Transit Authority, Smithsonian Institution, and 

D.C. Commission on the Arts and Humanities are partners in sponsoring the 2016 Lunchtime Music on the 

Mall every Thursday from noon to 1 p.m. during the 

summer months; 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 800 IH 

Whereas many Federal and other office workers work downtown and in the vicinity of the National Mall; 

Whereas the National Mall is a national and regional tourist 

attraction; 

Whereas Lunchtime Music on the Mall offers benefits to 

workers and visitors alike; 

Whereas the National Mall is a national treasure, supported 

by United States taxpayers to provide a unique park 

space with potential for various kinds of outdoor enjoyment; 

Whereas many talented amateur and professional musicians 

reside in the District of Columbia and the national capital region; 

Whereas the National Mall provides a natural stage for the 

display of city and regional talent; 

Whereas this year Lunchtime Music on the Mall will be located on the National Mall across from the Smithsonian 

Air and Space Museum entrance; and 

Whereas 2016 is the fifth season for Lunchtime Music on the 

Mall: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and commends— 

3 (1) Lunchtime Music on the Mall for providing 

4 enhancement to urban life and musical culture in 

5 the Nation’s capital and for appreciation of the out6 doors at the National Mall; 

7 (2) local performers bringing their talents to 

8 Lunchtime Music on the Mall; and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 800 IH 

1 (3) the National Park Service, the Washington 

2 Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Smithsonian 

3 Institution, D.C. Department of Parks and Recre4 ation, and the D.C. Commission on the Arts and 

5 Humanities for their public service in providing live 

6 music performances at no charge to the public. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
$

ै

संपकर्

ै

े े

1. 

2. 

3. 

 

*Animals must be at least

 18 months of age.

How to Help?

Contact

Why Scrapie?

1. Set up a sampling agreement 

2. Save heads of adult * sheep and goats 

3. Store heads and ALL identification

 (such as ear tags) in refrigeration 

Scrapie kills sheep and goats while

limiting exports. The industry needs

your help in finding the last case of

scrapie in the U.S. and to show 

when the U.S. is free of scrapie.

Slaughter facilities that save adult sheep 

and goat heads can get paid.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Issued May 2023

Finish the Fight Against Scrapie!
Annex 5. Item 6.2. – Glossary definitions:  ‘Aquatic Animal Products’
#### State v. Manley

18052

11/02/94

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 778 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 778

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 14, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5053) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from requiring that the identity 
of contributors to 501(c) organizations be included in annual returns. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 
Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute 
consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114-58 shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  At any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, 
pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5293) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate, the 
Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further consideration of 
the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
    Sec. 3.  Section 10002 of H.R. 5293 shall be considered to be a spending 
reduction account for purposes of section 3(d) of House Resolution 5.
    Sec. 4.  (a) During consideration of H.R. 5293, it shall not be in order to 
consider an amendment proposing both a decrease in an appropriation designated 
pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 and an increase in an appropriation not so 
designated, or vice versa.
     (b) Subsection (a) shall not apply to an amendment between the Houses.
    Sec. 5.  During consideration of H.R. 5293, section 3304 of Senate 
Concurrent Resolution 11 shall not apply.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2019131EN.01005101.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/51

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2019 — BRF and SHB Comercio e Industria de Alimentos v Commission

(Case T-429/18 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public health - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/700 - Amendment of the lists of third-country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments in Brazil - No urgency - Weighing-up of competing interests)

(2019/C 131/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: BRF SA (Itajaí, Brazil), SHB Comercio e Industria de Alimentos SA (Itajaí) (represented by: D. Arts and G. van Thuyne, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis, B. Eggers and B. Hofstötter, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, principally, suspension of the application of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/700 of 8 May 2018 amending the lists of third-country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments from Brazil (OJ 2018 L 118, p. 1), either until a definitive ruling has been given on the action brought by the applicants under Article 263 TFEU, or until such date as determined by the President of the General Court, and, in the alternative, suspension of the application of that regulation in so far as it concerns the applicants’ establishments included in (i) the list of establishments authorised to import meat from poultry and lagomorphs from Brazil (Section II), (ii) the list of establishments authorised to import minced meat, meat preparations and mechanically separated meat from Brazil (Section V) which have generated no more than two notifications via the rapid alert system for food and feed between 1 March 2017 and 19 April 2018 or (iii) the list of establishments authorised to import meat products from Brazil (Section VI), or an order for any other or additional measure which the President of the Court may consider necessary or appropriate

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 579 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 83
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 579

                          [Report No. 114-387]

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
  3762) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 2002 of the 
       concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2016

   Mr. Woodall, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
  3762) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 2002 of the 
       concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2016.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 3762) to provide 
for reconciliation pursuant to section 2002 of the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2016, with the Senate 
amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention 
of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee 
on the Budget or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 
amendment. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as 
read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
the Budget or their respective designees. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening 
motion.
    Sec. 2.  Section 3(b)(1) of House Resolution 5 is amended by 
striking ``the first session of''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 83

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 579

                          [Report No. 114-387]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
  3762) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 2002 of the 
       concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 5, 2016

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.01 - POWER OF ATTORNEY

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey M. Stibel and Gonzalo Troncoso,
and each of them, his lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Interland, Inc. for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005 and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granted unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      SIGNATURE                         TITLE                    DATE
-----------------------------          --------             ----------------
<S>                                    <C>                  <C>
 /s/ John B. Balousek                  Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
     John B. Balousek

/s/ Dr. John Patrick Crecine           Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
    Dr. John Patrick Crecine

    /s/ Robert Lee                     Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
        Robert Lee

   /s/ Jeffrey Stibel                  Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
       Jeffrey Stibel

   /s/ Robert T. Slezak                Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
       Robert T. Slezak

   /s/ Joel J. Kocher                  Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
       Joel J. Kocher

  /s/ Seymour Holtzman                 Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
      Seymour Holtzman

   /s/ Efrem Gerszberg                 Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
       Efrem Gerszberg

     /s/ Alex Kazerani                 Director             November 7, 2005
-----------------------------
         Alex Kazerani
</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MENDOZA-VERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51078.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Antonio Mendoza-Vera raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense, and by *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied*— U.S. -, — S.Ct. -, — L.Ed.2d -, 2005 WL 816208 (2005), and its progeny, which held that unpreserved claims based on *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), are reviewed for plain error. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Kathleen E. Donovan, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Dendrite International, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 7, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Kathleen E. Donovan                            |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Kathleen E. Donovan                                |
| Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----