alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Miron Markovitz, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lapis  Technologies,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures
(as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for the small
business issuer and have:

      (a)   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

      (b)   evaluated  the   effectiveness   of  the  small  business   issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.    The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I  have
disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit
committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions);

      (a)   all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

March 28, 2005

/s/ Miron Markovitz
-----------------------
Miron Markovitz
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.9


 


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
SECOND Amendment (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF August 12,
2015 AND AMENDED ON JULY 20, 2017 (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”)
AND frost gamma investments trust (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE
NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on August 12, 2015; and


 


WHEREAS, on July
20, 2017, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 until July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Second Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Second Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 



    	 



    	 



     


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 


6. Counterparts.
This Second Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Second Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Name:	James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	FROST GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Name: 	Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Title:	Trustee
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 608 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar New Year in 

2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2016 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, 

Ms. LEE, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. BORDALLO, 

Mr. HONDA, and Mr. PETERS) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar 

New Year in 2016. 

Whereas Lunar New Year begins on the second new moon 

following the winter solstice, or the first day of the new 

year according to the lunisolar calendar, and extends 

until the full moon 15 days later; 

Whereas the 15th day of the new year, according to the 

lunisolar calendar, is called the Lantern Festival; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is often referred to as ‘‘Spring 

Festival’’ in various Asian countries; 

Whereas many religious and ethnic communities use lunarbased calendars; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 608 IH 

Whereas Lunar New Year began in China more than 4,000 

years ago and is widely celebrated in East and Southeast 

Asia; 

Whereas the Asian diaspora has expanded the Lunar New 

Year celebration into an annual worldwide event; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is celebrated by millions of Asian 

Americans, and by many non-Asian Americans, in the 

United States; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is celebrated with community activities and cultural performances; 

Whereas participants celebrating Lunar New Year travel to 

spend the holiday reuniting with family and friends; and 

Whereas Lunar New Year is traditionally a time to wish 

upon others good fortune, health, prosperity, and happiness: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the cultural and historical signifi3 cance of Lunar New Year; 

4 (2) in observance of this Lunar New Year, the 

5 Year of the Monkey, expresses its deepest respect for 

6 Asian Americans and all individuals throughout the 

7 world who celebrate this significant occasion; and 

8 (3) wishes Asian Americans and all individuals 

9 who observe this holiday a happy and prosperous 

10 new year. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the
undersigned:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:May 13, 2009 By:/s/ Mark A. Houser

Mark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the Form 10-Q.  3
#### Estate of Takaki, In re

17100, 17989

1/21/99

Reversed in part, Affirmed in part & Remanded
Exhibit 10.6


 


Third AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
Third Amendment (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF september 24,
2014 and amended on july 27, 2015 (the “first amendment”), and July 20, 2017 (The “Second Amendment”) AMONG
NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”) AND JANE HSIAO (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE NOTE,
THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND THE THIRD AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on September 24, 2014;


 


WHEREAS, on July
20, 2017, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 until July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Third Amendment and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Third Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Third Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 



    	 



    	 



     


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Third Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 


6. Counterparts.
This Third Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Third Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	
        /s/ James J. Martin

        

	 	 	 	Name:	
        James J. Martin

        

	 	 	 	Title:	
        Chief Financial Officer

        

	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
        By:

        
	/s/ Jane Hsiao, Ph.D.	 	 	 
	Name:	
        Jane Hsiao, Ph.D.
March 28, 2007

26852

#### Engel v. Administrative Director of Courts

Affirmed
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1315 KA 09-01799 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EVERETT M. DURANT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (AMANDA L. DREHER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered June 10, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]). Viewing the evidence in light of the contested element of larcenous intent as charged to the jury ( see generally People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495). “Where, as here, witness credibility is of paramount importance to the determination of guilt or innocence, the appellate court must give [g]reat deference . . . [to the] fact-finder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor” ( People v McMillon , 77 AD3d 1375, 1376, lv denied 16 NY3d 897 [internal quotation marks omitted])

. While a finding that defendant did not have the requisite intent would not have been unreasonable, “it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” ( id. ). The victim testified that defendant stole his wallet during a group assault on him, and the People presented evidence establishing that defendant “knowingly participated and continued to participate even after his companion[s’] intentions [to take the victim’s cell phone] became clear” and thus “shared a ‘community of purpose’ with his companion[s]” ( People v Allah , 71 NY2d 830, 832). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, County Court properly denied his request for an adverse inference charge concerning the failure of the police to record his interrogation electronically ( see McMillon, 77-2- 1315 KA 09-01799

AD3d at 1375; People v Hammons , 68 AD3d 1800, 1801, lv denied 14 NY3d 801).

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
July 15, 2005

26728

#### Hutch v. State

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of Ameriana Bancorp (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Jerome J. GassenName: Jerome J. GassenTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ John J. LetterName: John J. LetterTitle: Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: May 3, 2012
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Porcine Commodity Import Into the

United States: Disease Status Table

Last Modified: 

Print

The following is a list of commodities with import status and diseases present in

each country. Reorder the table by selecting a column header. 

See USDA APHIS Definitions below for additional information.

Loading...

Porcine Commodities Import Status and Diseases Present

USDA APHIS Definitions

Bovine- Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and Bison bison (domestic cattle, bison).

Bovid- All members of the family Bovidae, including domestic cattle, bison, water

buffalo, yak etc.

Cervid- All members of the family Cervidae and hybrids, including deer, elk, moose,

caribou, reindeer, and related species.
Camelid- All species of the family Camelidae, including camels, guanacos, llamas,

alpacas, and vicunas.

Prohibited- The importation of this commodity is banned by federal regulations.

Not Currently Allowed- The importation of this commodity is not currently allowed

due to other foreign animal diseases of concern in the country of origin, the lack of a

negotiated or updated import protocol, or the lack of a negotiated export health

certificate from the country of origin. Please contact APHIS for more information.

Allowed- The importation of this commodity is permitted.

FMD- Foot and Mouth Disease

CSF- Classical Swine Fever

ASF- African Swine Fever

BSE- Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy

SVD- Swine Vesicular Disease
#### Love *v.*Elizabeth Coal Company et al., Appellants.

Argued October 26, 1942.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ.

*8. E. Torchia,*with him *Ralph E. Behney*and *Claude T. Reno,*Attorney General, for appellants.

*Samuel J. Goldstein,*for appellee, was not heard.

November 11, 1942:

Per Curiam,

*14The sole issue in this compensation case was one of fact. The board found upon substantial and competent evidence that the deceased met his death in the course of his employment as the result of an accident and awarded compensation to the claimant and her minor children. We are bound by the board’s action: *Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Company et al.,*131 Pa. Superior Ct. 266, 200 A. 224; *Russell v. Scott Paper Company,*140 Pa. Superior Ct. 84, 13 A. 2d 81; *Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Company,*147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, 24 A. 2d 51; *Williams v. Susquehanna Collieries Company,*148 Pa. Superior Ct. 540, 25 A. 2d 751.

Judgment is affirmed.
# C_2019255EN.01001502.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/15

---

Appeal brought on 18 December 2018 by Saga Furs Oyj against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 October 2018 in Case T-313/18: Saga Furs v EUIPO — Support Design

(Case C-805/18 P)

(2019/C 255/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Saga Furs Oyj (represented by: J. Kaulo, luvan saanut oikeudenkäyntiavustaja)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Support Design AB

By order of 12 June 2019 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
T.C. Memo. 2010-166

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

ENTERGY CORPORATION & AFFILIATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 25132-06. Filed July 28, 2010.

Stephen D. Gardner and William H. O’Brien, for petitioner.

Michael C. Prindible and Melissa D. Arndt, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HALPERN, Judge: Entergy Corp. (petitioner) is the common

parent of an affiliated group of corporations making a

consolidated return of income. Respondent determined

deficiencies of $17,341,254 and $61,729,798 in the group’s

Federal income tax for its 1997 and 1998 taxable (calendar)

years, respectively. The issues for decision are whether
- 2 -

1In PPL Corp. v. Commissioner, 135 T.C. ___ (2010), the

Commissioner made an alternative argument, asserting that if

street and area lighting assets were not used in the distribution

of electricity for sale, then they were “land improvements”. See

Rev. Proc. 87-56, 1987-2 C.B. 674, 677. In contrast, here

respondent expressly concedes any alternative argument. His

(continued...)

respondent properly denied (1) a foreign tax credit for the

United Kingdom (U.K.) windfall tax paid by petitioner’s indirect

U.K. subsidiary and (2) depreciation deductions that petitioner’s

U.S. subsidiaries claimed for street and area lighting assets

(the street light issue). A forthcoming report will address the

first issue. The second issue is identical to the issue in PPL

Corp. v. Commissioner, 135 T.C. ___ (2010), which we also decide

today, and the facts in this case relevant to that issue are

identical to the corresponding facts in PPL.

The parties have stipulated that, in 1997 and 1998, certain

of petitioner’s U.S. subsidiaries provided street and highway

lighting and nonroadway lighting for public and private entities. 

The sole issue is whether street and area lighting assets are

used in the “distribution of electricity for sale”. See Rev.

Proc. 87-56, 1987-2 C.B. 674, 685. (If they are, then those

assets have a recovery period of 20 years, see id.; if they are

not, then they have a recovery period of 7 years, see id., 1987-2

C.B. at 675.) In PPL, we answer that question in the negative.1
- 3 -

1(...continued)

concession does him no harm, however, because in PPL we also

found against the Commissioner on his alternative argument. 

Respondent makes no argument that leads us to believe we erred in

PPL. We rely on PPL in holding for petitioner on the street

light issue.
No. 92-7914.

#### Ward *v.*Whitley, Warden.

Crim. Dist. Ct. Orleans Parish, La. Certiorari denied.
98 P.3d 293

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

September 20, 2004

25514, 25515, 25516, 25529

#### Doe Children, In re; Doe, In re

Affirmed
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of XATA Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge: 1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the
Report. /s/ John G. LewisJohn G. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer
 Dated: December 20, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to XATA Corporation and
will be retained by XATA Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.