alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGAININ
PHARMACEUTICALS INC'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998  
<CASH>                                             806  
<SECURITIES>                                    24,227  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                          0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,332  
<PP&E>                                           6,384  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,359  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,456  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,317  
<BONDS>                                              0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                            45  
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,525  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,456  
<SALES>                                              0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0  
<CGS>                                                0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,589  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,393)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,393)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,393)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.83)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)  
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
                                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                      NAMES UNDER
                                    WHICH SUBSIDIARY      STATE OR JURISDICTION
     SUBSIDIARY NAME                 DOES BUSINESS          OF INCORPORATION               RELATIONSHIP
     ---------------                ----------------      ---------------------            ------------
<S>                            <C>                          <C>                         <C>

XET Corporation                XET Corporation;             New Jersey                  100% owned by Emrise
                               XIT Corporation; Digitran                                Corporation
                               Division in California

CXR Larus Corporation          CXR Larus Corporation (was   Delaware                    100% owned by Emrise
                               formerly CXR Telcom                                      Corporation
                               Corporation and Larus
                               Corporation)

XCEL Corporation Ltd.          XCEL Corporation Ltd.        United Kingdom              100% owned by XET
                                                                                        Corporation

XCEL Power Systems, Ltd.       XCEL Power Systems, Ltd.     United Kingdom              100% owned by XCEL
                                                                                        Corporation Ltd.

CXR-Anderson Jacobson          CXR-Anderson Jacobson        France                      100% owned by Emrise
                                                                                        Corporation

XCEL Japan Ltd.                XCEL Japan Ltd.              Japan                       100% owned by XET
                                                                                        Corporation

Belix Power Conversions        Belix Power Conversions      United Kingdom              100% owned by The Belix
Ltd.                           Ltd.                                                     Company Ltd.

Belix Wound Components         Belix Wound Components       United Kingdom              100% owned by Belix
Ltd.                           Ltd.                                                     Power Conversions Ltd.

The Belix Company Ltd.         The Belix Company Ltd.       United Kingdom              100% owned by XCEL
                                                                                        Corporation Ltd.

Pascall Electronic             Pascall Electronic           United Kingdom              100% owned by XCEL
(Holdings) Limited             (Holdings) Limited                                       Corporation Ltd.

Pascall Electronics            Pascall Electronics          United Kingdom              100% owned by Pascall
Limited                        Limited                                                  Electronic (Holdings)
                                                                                        Limited
</TABLE>
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-011

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to help with promoting psychological well-being in primates.

Topics covered in the series include social grouping, supporting species-typical activities, and special considerations. 

Supporting Natural Behaviors in Primates

Knowing how your primate species behaves in the wild is key to 

understanding what activities are enriching for the primates in your 

care. Consider, for example, how each species moves through its 

environment: Does it stay in the trees? Spend time on the ground? 

Brachiate (use its arms to swing)? Or cling to vertical surfaces? 

By designing your enrichment plan around the natural behaviors 

that are being supported and how they are being supported, you 

will be able to see if you are offering a proper 

range of activities to promote psychological 

well-being.

Environmental enrichment goes beyond toys and treats—it is 

everything that supports the natural behaviors of your primate species. 

DID YOU KNOW?

“Working’’ for food is one of the most 

common natural behaviors for primates. 

Keeping them occupied with opportunities 

to forage is a great way to promote 

psychological well-being. Some ways 

to do this include: 

l offering whole fruits or vegetables

that require extra work to access the

edible parts

l changing the way the standard diet is

fed so primates need to either search

their enclosure to find the food or

manipulate the food through or around

obstacles (like enclosure mesh)

l providing treats in puzzle feeders

l scattering food in different substrates, 

like bedding, straw, grass (real or

artificial), or leaf litter

NATURAL BEHAVIORS YOU CAN OFFER...

Many species 

spend time in trees

elevated resting areas in the main 

enclosure that are appropriate for 

the species

Some prefer to rest or 

sleep in hollow spaces 

nest boxes or similar structures 

Some engage in 

scent-marking

suitable scent-retaining surfaces, 

like wood or rope

Most species like variety: 

exploring, playing, and 

problem-solving

Items that can be picked up, played 

with, and then replaced when 

needed – anything that keeps them 

busy and allows safe exploration

COMMON WAYS 

TO SUPPORT 

NATURAL BEHAVIORS
23902

#### State v. Inoue

Affirmed
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20607

Summary Calendar

 

ZARAIL JOINER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BENNETT, Officer

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H:97-CV-3073

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Zarail Joiner appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 

Joiner argues that the district court erred denying his discovery

request and not allowing him to file objections to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation and report. These arguments are not

supported by the record. Joiner also argues that since he signed

a consent form to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(c), a magistrate judge, rather than the district 
No. 98-20607

-2-

court should have rendered the decision in his case. Although

Joiner did file a consent form prior to his case being

transferred to the U.S District Court for the Southern District

of Texas, he did not sign a consent form after his case was

transferred; therefore, Joiner did not have a right to proceed

before a magistrate judge.

Joiner does not address the district court’s reason for

dismissing his claim. Therefore, he has abandoned this issue on

appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
### Docket No. FAA **- 2011**  **- 0999**  **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response **National Business Aircraft Association** 

### Eli Cotti 10/7/10 

### --- **Regional Airline Association** 

### Dave Lot**terer** 10/7/10 

### --- **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association** 

### Robert Hackman 10/7/10 

### --- **ATA** 

### Craig Fabian 10/7/10 

### ---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 6550-005]


JBS Rentals, LLC, 5J's LLC; Notice of Transfer of Exemption

    1. On October 10, 2023, 5J's LLC filed a notification of the 
transfer for the 30-kilowatt Biber Spellenberg Hydroelectric Project 
No. 6550 from JBS Rentals, LLC to 5J's LLC. The exemption from 
licensing was originally issued on February 14, 1983.\1\ The project is 
located on Bidden Creek, Trinity County, California. The transfer of an 
exemption does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Frank M. Biber and Steven Spellenberg, 22 FERC ] 62,182 
(1983). Subsequently, on August 15, 2017, the project was 
transferred to JBS Rentals, LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. 5J's LLC is now the exemptee of the Biber Spellenberg 
Hydroelectric Project No. 6550. All correspondence must be forwarded to 
Cynthia Anderson, Owner, and Manager, 5J's LLC, P.O. Box 127, Willow 
Creek, CA 95573, Phone: 916-220-6712, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97d3eef9f6f0fbfef3f2aea1d7f0faf6fefbb9f4f8fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4105382f20262d282524787701262c20282d6f222e2c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 6, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27220 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### State v. Silva

15570

9/13/94

Affirmed
3

                                


EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
General Nutrition Companies, Inc.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

We  have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet  of
General  Nutrition Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October
11,  1997, the related consolidated statements of operations  for
the  twelve  and  thirty-six weeks ended  October  11,  1997  and
October 12, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of  cash
flows for the thirty-six weeks ended October 11, 1997 and October
12,  1996.  These financial statements are the responsibility  of
the Corporation's management.

We  conducted our review in accordance with standards established
by  the  American Institute of Certified Public  Accountants.   A
review  of interim financial information consists principally  of
applying  analytical  procedures to financial data and of  making
inquiries  of  persons responsible for financial  and  accounting
matters.   It  is  substantially less  in  scope  than  an  audit
conducted   in   accordance  with  generally  accepted   auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion
regarding   the   financial  statements   taken   as   a   whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based   on   our  review,  we  are  not  aware  of  any  material
modifications that should be made to such consolidated  financial
statements  for them to be in conformity with generally  accepted
accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing  standards, the consolidated balance  sheet  of  General
Nutrition  Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries  as  of  February  1,
1997,  and  the  related consolidated statements  of  operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended  (not
presented  herein); and in our report dated March  31,  1997,  we
expressed  an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.   In our opinion, the information set  forth  in  the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 1, 1997 is
fairly  stated,  in  all material respects, in  relation  to  the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
November 15, 1997
10506

#### State v. Lynch

Dismissed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 804 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 804

      Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow 
independent, non-government television cameras to broadcast House floor 
                              proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 5, 2016

  Mr. Bera (for himself, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Peters, Mrs. Lawrence, Mrs. 
Watson Coleman, and Ms. Lee) submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow 
independent, non-government television cameras to broadcast House floor 
                              proceedings.

    Resolved, That clause 2(b) of rule V of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
thereof the following: ``and shall be permitted to record and broadcast 
at any time a Member is present on the floor.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019139EN.01004901.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2019 –Aytekin v EUIPO — Dienne Salotti (Dienne)

(Case T-107/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Dienne - Earlier EU figurative mark ENNE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 139/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Erkan Aytekin (Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: V. Martín Santos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and G. Sakalaite-Orlovskiene, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dienne Salotti Srl (Altamura, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2017 (Case R 1444/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Aytekin and Dienne Salotti.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Erkan Aytekin to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Dienne Salotti Srl. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Erkan Aytekin to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Dienne Salotti Srl.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply632Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  David Linn (no... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 10, 2020 - 2:12pmInteresting!  Thank you, Kate.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(A)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert F. Doman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Robert F. Doman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert F. Doman
                                        President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)
Date: November 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       66
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23
                              CONSENT OF AUDITORS
<PAGE>
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") of our report
dated February 7, 1997, included in the 1996 Annual Report to stockholders of
the Company, which is incorporated by reference in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                   /s/ Radics & Co., LLC
                                                   ---------------------
                                                   Radics & Co., LLC


March 26, 1997
Pine Brook, New Jersey
#### State v. Makuakane

17342

3/14/95

Affirmed
#### Mann v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.

26131

12/23/2005

Vacated & remanded
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ECO 2 Plastics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the
      year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), Rodney S. Rougelot, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Rodney
              S.
              RougelotRodney
                S. RougelotIts:
                Chief Executive Officer, Director





March
      29,
      2007





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ECO 2 Plastics, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]