alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 170 

Recognizing the National Association of Letter Carriers’ One Day Food 

Drive. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2015 

Mr. TIBERI (for himself, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. CHABOT, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. 

JOYCE, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the National Association of Letter Carriers’ One 

Day Food Drive. 

Whereas the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) 

began their One Day Food Drive in 1992; 

Whereas for many years prior to 1992, a number of NALC 

branches collected food for the needy in the communities 

they served; 

Whereas in 1992, 10 cities were selected to explore a coordinated effort, and a pilot food drive was held in Columbus, 

Ohio, by Branch 78 of the NALC; 

Whereas the pilot food drive was so successful that the food 

drive was then expanded nationwide; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 170 IH 

Whereas a nationwide One Day Food Drive was organized for 

May 15, 1993, with the goal of having at least one 

NALC Branch participate in each of the 50 States; 

Whereas more than 220 NALC branches participated in the 

first national One Day Food Drive and set a one-day 

record for food collection in the United States by collecting more than 11 million pounds of food; 

Whereas in 2014, the NALC collected nearly 73 million 

pounds of food to help restock food banks, pantries, and 

shelters throughout the United States; 

Whereas 2014 marked the 11th consecutive year that the 

One Day Food Drive collected more than 70 million 

pounds of food; 

Whereas the NALC One Day Food Drive has collected more 

than 1.3 billion pounds of food since it began in 1992; 

and 

Whereas the NALC One Day Food Drive occurs on the second Saturday in May each year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the National Association of Let3 ter Carriers’ One Day Food Drive; and 

4 (2) honors the National Association of Letter 

5 Carriers for their distinguished community service 

6 and philanthropic efforts. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019035EN.01001101.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen (Belgium) lodged on 14 November 2018 — X v Belgische Staat

(Case C-706/18)

(2019/C 35/14)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Question referred

Does Directive 2003/86/EC (1) — having regard to Article 3(5), as well as the objective thereof, in particular, the determination of the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification — preclude national legislation which requires that Article 5(4) of Directive 2003/86/EC be interpreted as meaning that the consequence of no decision having been taken by the expiry of the prescribed period is that national authorities are under an obligation to grant, of their own motion, a residence permit to the person concerned, without first establishing that that person in fact satisfies the conditions for residence in Belgium in conformity with EU law?

---

(1)  Council Directive of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12).

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.5
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of 1st Realty Investments, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2002, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Szilagyi, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ William Szilagyi
                                         --------------------
                                         William Szilagyi
                                         President
                                         Principal Financial Officer
                                         November 14, 2002

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

                                       1
#### Ben Wiley JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. O-76-519.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 2, 1976.

ORDER DENYING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND ORDER MODIFYING SENTENCE OF DEATH TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT AT HARD LABOR

Ben Wiley Jones, Jr., files in this Court a Motion requesting this Court reverse the First Degree Murder conviction and Death Sentence he sustained in the Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF-2221 and remand this cause for a new trial. His conviction was previously affirmed by this Court in *Jones v. State,*Okl.Cr., 542 P.2d 1316, and was before this Court pursuant to a collateral attack, *Jones v. State,*No. PC-76-396 (CCA, Okla., June 3, 1976).

Jones contends that the recent United States Supreme Court decisions have rendered Oklahoma’s homicide murder statute, 21 O.S.Supp.1973, § 701.1, et seq. unconstitutional. See *Green v.*Oklahoma, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3216, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976); *Justus v. Oklahoma,*- U.S. -, 96 S. Ct. 3216, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976); *Lusty v.*Oklahoma,-U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3217, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976); *Davis v. Oklahoma,*- U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3217, 49 L.Ed.2d — (1976); *Rowbotham v.*Oklahoma, U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3218, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976) and *Williams and Justus v. Oklahoma,*- U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3218, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976).

He also reiterates the argument presented in *Jones v. State,*Okl.Cr., 542 P. 2d 1316, specifically that the First Degree Murder provision upon which he was con*1213victed, 21 O.S.Supp.1973, § 701.1, ¶ 9 is unconstitutional as it improperly incorporates by reference the provisions of 21 O.S.1971, § 843, and thus two punishments exist for Murder in the First Degree, citing the principles in *Ex Parte McMahan,*94 Okl.Cr. 419, 237 P.2d 462.

We first note that no statutory authority exists for the filing of the instant motion, however, we shall construe the pleading as a Writ of Habeas Corpus and thus accept jurisdiction.

Jones’ latter contention was sufficiently disposed of in *Jones v. State,*Okl. Cr., 542 P.2d 1316, and we find no grounds to persuade us to deviate from that position.

Lastly, the United States Supreme Court has not declared Oklahoma’s homicide murder statutes unconstitutional, but, merely has stricken the death penalty provision, 21 O.S.Supp.1973, § 701.3, as imposed under this statutory scheme. Thus, the conviction sustained by Jones is valid, however, his punishment of death must be modified to life imprisonment at hard labor. See *Riggs v. Branch,*554 P.2d 823, Okl.Cr., (1976).

IT IS, THEREFORE, THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the sentence of death imposed against Jones in the Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF-2221 be, and hereby is, modified to life imprisonment at hard labor.

IT IS, THE FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the above styled and numbered cause be, and hereby is, DENIED AS SO MODIFIED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 2nd day of September, 1976.

TOM BRETT, P. J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

C. F. BLISS, JR, J.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quaretly Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

December 30, 2008By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER Christopher R. Gardner
Chief Executive Officer


I,
Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Vitesse
Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

December 30, 2008By:

/s/ RICHARD C. YONKER Richard C. Yonker
Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
NUMBER 13-15-00015-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ALFREDO SOBREVILLA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Writ of Prohibition.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Alfredo Sobrevilla, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and writ of 

prohibition in the above cause on January 7, 2015, contending that the trial court abused 

its discretion in granting a new trial following a jury verdict without specifically stating its 

reasons for doing so. The Court requested and received a response to the petition from 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); TEX.

R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

the real party in interest, Brownsville Independent School District. Relator now seeks to 

dismiss this original proceeding with prejudice on grounds that the parties have resolved 

their dispute. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss, is of the 

opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed by this Court 

is LIFTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting 

temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). We GRANT the motion to 

dismiss and we DISMISS this original proceeding with prejudice. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

18th day of February, 2015.
##### 



ZIX CORPORATION
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
(CEO & Direct Reports)
    Definitions.
 Acceleration Event
 Acquiring Person
 12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 1




---



##### 



Affiliate and Associate
 Change in Control
       12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 2




---



##### 



Continuing Director
 Disability
 Exchange Act
 Resignation
 Retirement
 Term of Option .
 Exercise of Option .
 Exercise,
 Adjustment
 12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 3




---



##### 



Method of Exercise
    Termination of Option.
  12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 4




---



##### 



nolo contendere,
  No Rights as Shareholder.
 State and Federal Securities Regulation.
 12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 5




---



##### 



Modification of Options
 Withholding of Taxes
 Continued Employment Not Presumed
 Non-Competition Covenants
  12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 6




---



##### 



either either
     12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 7




---



##### 



Option Issued Pursuant to Plan.
 No Liability of Option.
 No Assignment.
 Governing Law.
 Entire Agreement.
 12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 8




---



##### 



Notice .
 ZIX CORPORATIONDate: 1//9/08
    By:
    /s/ Barry W. WilsonBarry W. WilsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer 12/07
    
    Acceleration Event
 9




---



##### 



Zix Corporation (TX)2711 N. Haskell AvenueSuite 2200
    
    Signature PageDallas, Texas 75204
    
    Sign and return to the legal departmentUnited States
  Effective Date of Grant:
    
    December 20, 2007Name of Optionee:
    
    Spurr, RickNumber of Shares:
    
    400,000.00Exercise Price:
    
    $4.87Plan Name:
    
    2004 Stock Option PlanExpiration Date:
    
    December 19, 2017Issuance Type:
    
    OPT
 Number of Shares:
    
    Vest Date:33,333.00
    
    March 20, 200833,334.00
    
    June 20, 200833,333.00
    
    September 20, 200833,333.00
    
    December 20, 200833,334.00
    
    March 20, 200933,333.00
    
    June 20, 200933,333.00
    
    September 20, 200933,334.00
    
    December 20, 200933,333.00
    
    March 20, 201033,333.00
    
    June 20, 201033,334.00
    
    September 20, 201033,333.00
    
    December 20, 2010
 /s/ Richard D. Spurr

Optionee Signature
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    1-18-08
#### State v. Souza

23987

05/02/2002

Affirmed
17468

#### State v. Phillips

December 19, 1996

Order No. 96-41

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         102,151
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,497
<PP&E>                                         3,155,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,007,684)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,369,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,309
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,364,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,369,124
<SALES>                                        432,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,120
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,916<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            203,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the reference to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-34451, No. 33-53010, No. 33-65061, No.333-06503, No. 333-06505, No. 333-06507, No. 333-06511, No. 333-90323, No.333-31294, No. 333-55068, No. 333-61822, No. 333-62604, No. 333-74890, No.333-96663, No. 333-104532, No. 333-104533, No. 333-105059, No. 333-107778, No.333-112514, No. 333-115638, and No. 333-115639) and the Registration Statements(Forms S-3 No. 333-33708, No. 333-36556, No. 333-83934, No. 333-100337, No.333-100399, No. 333-100400, No. 333-101041, No. 333-105060, No. 333-107191, No.333-107776, No. 333-107777, No. 333-108560, No. 333-109593, No. 333-112783, No.333-118687, and 333-120548) of our report dated March 12, 2004, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Zix Corporation for the years endedDecember 31, 2003 and 2002 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2004.
       Dallas, Texas /s/ Ernst & Young LLPMarch 28, 2005
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-976

_____________________________

ELIJAH MOORE, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

September 18, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Elijah Moore, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,161,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,624,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,504,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,000,000
<PP&E>                                      16,150,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,176,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,774,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,381,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    34,480,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     640,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,774,000
<SALES>                                     14,168,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,168,000
<CGS>                                        9,610,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,610,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,213,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,241,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (631,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            610,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   610,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                           Subsidiaries of Registrant
                           --------------------------


         The Company has the following subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned and included in the consolidated financial statements.



                                                          State or Country
Name of Subsidiary                                        of Incorporation
------------------                                        ----------------

Brush Wellman GmbH                                        Germany

Brush Wellman (Japan), Ltd.                               Japan

Brush Wellman Limited                                     England

Brush Wellman (Singapore), Pte Ltd.                       Singapore

Circuits Processing Technology Inc.                       California

Technical Materials, Inc.                                 Ohio

Williams Advanced Materials Inc.                          New York

Williams Advanced Materials Pte Ltd.                      Singapore
This is an exemption request pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012 for Brian 

Austin Photography, where we request to perform Non-Profit and Commercial aerial 

photography through the use of its small unmanned aircraft commercially in airspace 

regulated by the FAA. The owner and pilot has taken his passion for still photography and 

made it his career. The owner is a seasoned leader in unmanned aerial videography with 

over 2 years recreational/hobby experience in all aspects of small UAVs. As well as, has 

excellent abilities to safely operating small UAS within our airspace.

Description of Petitioner

Brian Austin is the sole owner of Brian Austin Photography which currently performs Real 

Estate Photography and Event Photography. The owner is looking to utilize their knowledge, 

skills and safety measures with drones for commercial Real Estate Photography, Event 

Photography and Nonprofits in the Greater Houston Area. As a seasoned professional, the 

owner always follows the AMA National Model Aircraft Safety Code (Exhibit B), and the 

latest FAA Rules and Guidelines.

Contact information:

Brian Austin Photography

Brian Austin

302 Cobia Dr. Apt 11307

Katy TX, 77494

briancaustin@gmail.com

(281) 961 - 6324

Please see attached Documents for the full exemption request

1. Exhibit_A_Brian Austin Photography Petition_Exemption/Rule-making.doc

2. Exhibit_B_sUAS_Safety_Program_web.pdf

3. Exhibit_C_PHANTOM2_User_Manual_V1.4_en.pdf

4. Exhibit_D_Phantom_2_Vision_Pilot_Traning_Guide_en.pdf

5. Exhibit_E_PHANTOM2_Quick_Start_Guide_en.pdf

6. Exhibit_F_Smart_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines.pdf

7. Exhibit_G_Monthly_Maintenance_Log.xlsx

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Brian Austin