alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018445EN.01000301.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/3

---

Appeal brought on 1 August 2018 by the European Parliament against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 17 May 2018 in Case T-566/16: Josefsson v European Parliament

(Case C-506/18 P)

(2018/C 445/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Erik Josefsson

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment under appeal;

| — | consequently, dismiss the application at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, dismiss the application at first instance;

| — | order the parties to bear their own costs in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the parties to bear their own costs in the present proceedings;

| — | order Mr Josefsson to pay the costs at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Mr Josefsson to pay the costs at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In its appeal, Parliament relies on the following grounds:

| (i) | error of law, distortion of the facts and failure to state reasons in the finding that the requirement of a qualification in law was the cause of the applicant's dismissal; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

error of law, distortion of the facts and failure to state reasons in the finding that the requirement of a qualification in law was the cause of the applicant's dismissal;

| (ii) | error of law in its finding that the adoption of an organigram and the decisions relating to it and the description of the posts therein must be subject to the applicant's right to be heard; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

error of law in its finding that the adoption of an organigram and the decisions relating to it and the description of the posts therein must be subject to the applicant's right to be heard;

| (iii) | distortion of the facts, manifest error of assessment and lack of reasoning in the conclusion that, if the applicant had also been heard on the question of his possession of a qualification in law, that hearing could have effectively changed the result of the decision-making process in question. |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

distortion of the facts, manifest error of assessment and lack of reasoning in the conclusion that, if the applicant had also been heard on the question of his possession of a qualification in law, that hearing could have effectively changed the result of the decision-making process in question.

---
# C_2021053EN.01003001.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-187/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period - Decision not to renew - Manifest error of assessment - Right to be heard - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Liability - Material damage - Non-material damage)

(2021/C 53/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: M. Brugia, acting as Agent, and by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for (i) annulment of Cedefop’s decision of 12 May 2017 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite period and, as far as necessary, of the decision of 1 December 2017 rejecting her complaint of 9 August 2017 against the decision of 12 May 2017 and (ii) compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 12 May 2017 not to renew VP’s contract as a member of the temporary staff; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 12 May 2017 not to renew VP’s contract as a member of the temporary staff;

| 2. | Annuls the decision of 1 December 2017 rejecting VP’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of 1 December 2017 rejecting VP’s complaint;

| 3. | Orders Cedefop to pay EUR 30 000 as compensation for the material damage sustained by VP; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Cedefop to pay EUR 30 000 as compensation for the material damage sustained by VP;

| 4. | Orders Cedefop to pay EUR 10 000 as compensation for the non-material damage sustained by VP; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Cedefop to pay EUR 10 000 as compensation for the non-material damage sustained by VP;

| 5. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 6. | Orders Cedefop to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Orders Cedefop to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
|Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CEO
AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dendrite International, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), John E. Bailye, as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Kathleen E. Donovan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:


     (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|JOHN E. BAILYE
Name:  John E. Bailye
Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 18, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

|KATHLEEN E. DONOVAN
Name:  Kathleen E. Donovan
Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 18, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |
# C_2019357EN.01003001.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2019 — DK v EEAS

(Case T-217/18) (1)

(Civil service - Disciplinary proceedings - Criminal conviction - Penalty of withholding an amount from the pension - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons - Mitigating circumstances - Liability)

(2019/C 357/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: DK (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 23 May 2017 to impose on the applicant a disciplinary penalty and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the EEAS’ infringement of his rights of defence in the criminal proceedings brought against him before the Belgian courts.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DK to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DK to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.

---
EX-10.2


 Exhibit 10.2 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is executed on December 9, 2016, by and
between Stone Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), and TH Exploration III, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Buyer”). 

RECITALS: 
 WHEREAS,
Seller and Buyer are parties to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), executed on October 20, 2016; and 

WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer desire to amend the Purchase Agreement in the manner and upon the terms and conditions hereafter set forth. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises, representations, warranties, covenants, conditions and agreements
contained herein, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound by the terms hereof, agree as follows: 

1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Purchase Agreement.

 2. Bankruptcy Deadline. Section 11.01(f)(ii) of the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the date “December
9, 2016” in its entirety and replacing such date with “December 14, 2016.” 
 3. Continuation of Agreement. From and
after the effective date of this Amendment, all references to the Purchase Agreement set forth therein or in any other agreement or instrument shall, unless otherwise specifically provided, be references to the Purchase Agreement as amended by this
Amendment and as may be further amended, modified, restated or supplemented from time to time by the parties. This Amendment is limited as specified and shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute an amendment, modification or waiver of any
provision of the Purchase Agreement except as expressly set forth herein. As amended hereby, the Purchase Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to its terms. 

4. Miscellaneous. The terms and provisions of Section 15.07 (Governing Law) and Section 15.10 (Counterparts) of the Purchase
Agreement shall apply to this Amendment, mutatis mutandis, as if fully set forth herein. 
 [Signature page follows] 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been signed by each of the parties hereto on the date
first above written. 
  

			
	SELLER
	
	STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kenneth H. Beer

	Name:	 	Kenneth H. Beer
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


 Signature Page to First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement 






 
			
	BUYER
	
	TH EXPLORATION III, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ M. Evan Radler

	Name:	 	M. Evan Radler
	Title:	 	Chief Operating Officer


 Signature Page to First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-73320) of 
Financial Federal Corporation of our report dated September 4, 1997, included 
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by 
reference in such Registration Statement of our report on the Financial 
Statement Schedules, which appears on Page 13 of this Form 10-K.


                                          /s/ Eisner & Lubin LLP
                                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


New York, New York
October 22, 1997
                                       46
<PAGE>
# C_2018182EN.01001302.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 9 March 2018 — Oro Efectivo S.L. v Diputación Foral de Bizkaia

(Case C-185/18)

(2018/C 182/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Oro Efectivo S.L.

Applicant:

Defendant: Diputación Foral de Bizkaia

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) the principle of tax neutrality arising from that directive, and the case-law of the Court of Justice interpreting the directive preclude a national rule of law under which a Member State may require payment of an indirect tax other than VAT from a business person or professional in respect of the purchase of movable property (specifically, gold, silver or jewellery) from a private individual where:

1

| 1. | the purchased object is going to be processed and subsequently sold on in the course of that business person’s economic activities; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the purchased object is going to be processed and subsequently sold on in the course of that business person’s economic activities;

| 2. | transactions subject to VAT will occur when the purchased property is reintroduced into the course of trade; and |
| --- | --- |

2.

transactions subject to VAT will occur when the purchased property is reintroduced into the course of trade; and

| 3. | in such transactions the applicable legislation in that same Member State does not permit the business person or professional to deduct the amount paid by way of that tax in respect of the initial purchase? |
| --- | --- |

3.

in such transactions the applicable legislation in that same Member State does not permit the business person or professional to deduct the amount paid by way of that tax in respect of the initial purchase?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ARI Network Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:

         (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
             January 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
             requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
             Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 17, 2003


                                        /s/ Timothy Sherlock
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Timothy Sherlock
                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 625 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 625

    Expressing support for the designation of February 28, 2016, as 
              ``National Rare Eye Disease Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2016

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, and Mr. 
LaMalfa) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the designation of February 28, 2016, as 
              ``National Rare Eye Disease Awareness Day''.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Rare Eye Disease 
        Awareness Day'' to raise awareness to the needs of blind 
        individuals; and
            (2) provides awareness for the need of accessible materials 
        for blind students for high school and college, the need to 
        increase funding for research, and promotes access to genetic 
        testing.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
MAF Bancorp, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.'s
33-79110, 333-83534, 333-61792, 333-72863, 333-72865, 333-110986, and
333-110990) on Form S-8 of MAF Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 14,
2005, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of MAF
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of MAF Bancorp, Inc.


                                               /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2



GENAERA CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Skolas, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John A. Skolas                                  
|John A. Skolas                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 5, 2005
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00248

- CV

LISA YOUNG APPELLANT

V.

WILLIE VAUGHAN APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------- -

On October 7, 2010 , we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellant or any pa rty desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Because appellant 's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appe al for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: November 4, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          37,664
<SECURITIES>                                    15,056
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,431
<PP&E>                                           9,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,037
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,095
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,231
<CGS>                                           54,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1174)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,736
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,403
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>