alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

CONESTOGA ENTERPRISES, INC.

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years Ended December 31,                         2001           2000            1999           1998          1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    (In Thousands, Except Ratios)
<S>                                            <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>           <C>
Consolidated pre-tax income (loss)             $  (5,652)     $   6,397       $   6,761      $  19,505     $  17,248

Undistributed earnings from
  unconsolidated partnership
  interests                                            -              -               -              -        (1,345)

Equity in losses from unconsolidated
  Partnership interests                               39            339             350             69             -

Interest                                           5,431          4,976           4,101          3,929         2,034
                                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings (Loss)                                $    (182)     $  11,712       $  11,212      $  23,503     $  17,937
                                               =====================================================================

Interest                                       $   5,431      $   4,976       $   4,101      $   3,929     $   2,034

Preferred stock dividends (1)                        719            895             931          1,128         1,150
                                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividends                              $   6,150      $   5,871       $   5,032      $   5,057     $   3,184
                                               =====================================================================
Ratio                                                  -           1.99            2.23           4.65          5.63
                                               =========      =========       =========      =========     =========

Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred stock dividends                $  (6,332)     $       -       $       -      $       -     $       -
                                               =====================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Preferred stock dividends/(100% - income tax rate)

                                      -79-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                5


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-05-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-07-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       97,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        299,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   429,550
<PP&E>                                             282,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,116,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              232,197
<BONDS>                                            757,280
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               679
<OTHER-SE>                                         121,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,116,952
<SALES>                                            336,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   336,357
<CGS>                                              222,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      222,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     26,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,851
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 16,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        16,772
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.25



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41399 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD LEE BARLOW, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-150

- - - - - - - - - - October 30, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ronald Lee Barlow, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Barlow argues that the magistrate judge inadequately reviewed the record and erred in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing; he further argues that the district court erred in failing to undertake a de

novo review of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations. Barlow also renews his contention that his jury-trial waiver wasunknowing, that his conviction was the result of prosecutorial

misconduct, and that trial and appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
# C_2019148EN.01005201.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Novartis v EUIPO (SMARTSURFACE)

(Case T-463/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark SMARTSURFACE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 148/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basle, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Junquera Lara, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2018 (Case R 1765/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign SMARTSURFACE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novartis AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novartis AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11

DOMINION BRIDGE CORPORATION
COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND
COMMON-SHARE EQUIVALENT
(In thousands of U.S. dollars except share data)
---------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Year ended
                                                                       September 30,
                                                                       1997
<S>                                                                    <C>
Income applicable to common stock                                          $(22,320)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary shares:
  Average number of common shares outstanding during the period          28,834,000
  Common-share equivalents attributable to options and preferred stock           --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total common shares and common-share equivalents                       28,834,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary earnings per common share and common-share equivalent                 (0.77)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Year ended
                                                                       September 30,
                                                                       1996
<S>                                                                    <C>
Income applicable to common stock                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fully diluted  shares:
  Average number of common shares outstanding during the period          18,174,000
  Common-share equivalents attributable to options and preferred stock           --
  Dilutive preferred shares                                                      --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total common shares and common-share equivalents                       18,174,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fully diluted earnings per common share and common-share equivalents           (.55)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
#### State v. Palmeira

16109

12/16/93

Denied

862 P.2d 1073
# C_2021289EN.01003302.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-71/18) (1)

(Rules on languages - Notice of Open Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the fields of financial economics and macroeconomics - Knowledge of languages - Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competition to three languages - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Discrimination based on language - Interests of the service - Proportionality)

(2021/C 289/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent and P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Vernier, G. Gattinara and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Jiménez García, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/339/17 organised to draw up a reserve list of administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Financial economics and 2. Macroeconomics (OJ 2017 C 386 A, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/339/17 organised to draw up a reserve list of administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Financial economics and 2. Macroeconomics; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/339/17 organised to draw up a reserve list of administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Financial economics and 2. Macroeconomics;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
#### Charles A. ROPER, Jr., Appellant, v. R. P. BALKCOM, Jr., Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia, Appellee.

No. 20812.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 26, 1963.

Charles A. Roper, Jr., Reidsville, Ga., for appellant.

William L. Grayson, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Ga., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The district court denied the application of a state prisoner for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that state remedies had not been exhausted. The determination of the district court was required by the established facts and its judgment is

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:    August 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 11198 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Ramiro Miranda

- Silva,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 604

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro Miranda

- Silva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Miranda

- Silva has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-11198 Document: 00516340080 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2022No. 21

- 11198

2 We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

. Case: 21-11198 Document: 00516340080 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2022
Abbreviations used in Diagnostic Test Reports issued by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories

Abbreviation Description

Adeno 127 Adenovirus 127

AEV Avian encephalomyelitis virus

AGID Agar gel immunodiffusion

AI Avian influenza

AIV Avian influenza virus

aMPV Avian metapneumovirus

aMPV-CO Avian metapneumovirus, Colorado strain

aMPV-Hung Avian metapneumovirus, Hungarian strain

aMPV-UK Avian metapneumovirus, United Kingdom strain

APMV-1 Avian paramyxovirus type 1

APMV-2 Avian paramyxovirus type 2

APMV-3 Avian paramyxovirus type 3

APMV-4 Avian paramyxovirus type 4

APMV-5 Avian paramyxovirus type 5

APMV-6 Avian paramyxovirus type 6

APMV-7 Avian paramyxovirus type 7

APMV-8 Avian paramyxovirus type 8

APMV-9 Avian paramyxovirus type 9

CAV Chicken anemia virus

DVE Duck viral enteritis

EDS-76 Egg-drop syndrome-76

ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

GPV Goose parvovirus

HA Hemagglutination

HEV Duck hepatitis virus

HI Hemagglutination inhibition

IBD Infectious bursal disease

IBV Infectious bronchitis virus

IBV ARK 99 Infectious bronchitis virus-Arkansas

IBV CONN 46 Infectious bronchitis virus-Connecticut

IBV MASS Infectious bronchitis virus-Massachusetts

IFA Indirect fluorescent antibody

ILT Infectious laryngotracheitis

MDPV Muscovy duck parvovirus

MDV Marek's disease virus

ND Newcastle disease

NDV Newcastle disease virus

NT Not tested

QNS Quantity not sufficient

rRT-PCR Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

1 of 1 3/3/2013
#### Association of Apartment Owners of Aikahi Gardens v. Lepere

20571

9/11/1998

Granted
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10(q)

                    ANNUAL TOP MANAGEMENT CASH BONUS PROGRAM


The Company maintains a cash bonus plan whereby the executive officers and
salaried marketing department personnel are eligible to receive cash bonuses
equal to a percentage of the executive officer's base salary if certain
corporate pretax profit objectives are achieved. The executive officers selected
each year to participate in the cash bonus plan, as well as the performance
targets on which the cash bonuses are based and the amount of the cash bonuses
are determined each year at the discretion of the Chairman and the Board of
Directors.

Specifically, the Chairman recommends to the Board of Directors certain
executive officers who will participate in the plan each year. Such executive
officers who will participate in the plan as evidenced by written notice from
the Company. The amount of the actual cash bonus paid to the various executive
officers participating in the cash bonus plan is calculated based on the
attainment of the corporate pretax profit objectives set-at the commencement of
each fiscal year.

The cash bonuses are normally paid within the sixty (60) days after the end of
the fiscal year.



                                       40
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Michael Renner, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1479 C.D. 2017

:

The Court of Common Pleas :

of Lehigh County, County of Lehigh, :

John J. Sikora and Mark Surovy :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, December 3, 2018

, having considered appellant’s application for

reconsideration/

reargument

, the application is denied.
EXHIBIT 21

Exhibit 21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The Company has seven wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
others listed are either direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Bank.



|                                 |  |                       
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY      |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|Mid America Bank, fsb            |  | United States         
|MAF Bancorp Capital Trust I      |  | Delaware              
|MAF Bancorp Capital Trust II     |  | Delaware              
|MAF Developments, Inc.           |  | Illinois              
|Mid Town Development Corporation |  | Illinois              
|Equitable Finance Corp.          |  | Illinois              
|Computer Dynamics Group, Inc.    |  | Illinois              



|                                        |  |                       
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE BANK                |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|Mid America Investment Services, Inc.   |  | Illinois              
|Mid America Insurance Agency, Inc.      |  | Illinois              
|Mid America Finance Corporation         |  | Illinois              
|Mid America Mortgage Securities, Inc.   |  | Illinois              
|N.W. Financial Corporation              |  | Illinois              
|Randall Road Development Corporation    |  | Illinois              
|Centre Point Title Services, Inc.       |  | Illinois              
|Reigate Woods Development Corporation   |  | Illinois              
|MAF Realty Co., L.L.C.  III            |  | Delaware              
|MAF Realty Co., L.L.C.  IV             |  | Delaware              
|Mid America Re, Inc.                    |  | Vermont               
|EFS Service Corporation                 |  | Illinois              
|EFS Financial Services, Inc.            |  | Illinois              
|SF Investment Corporation               |  | Nevada                
|SF Insurance Services Corporation       |  | Wisconsin             
|St. Francis Equity Properties, Inc. (1) |  | Wisconsin             
|Center Point Mortgage, Inc.             |  | Illinois              

---

|(1) | St. Francis Equity Properties, Inc. is a 98% or 99% partner or member in 13 individual limited liability partnerships or limited liability companies, each of which invest in an
affordable housing property within the State of Wisconsin.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------