alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
19611

#### State v. Metzger

December 5, 1996

Order No. 96-45

Vacated
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
General Nutrition Companies, Inc.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

We  have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet  of
General  Nutrition  Companies,  Inc.   and   subsidiaries  as  of
October  12,  1996  and  the related consolidated  statements  of
operations  and  cash flows for the twelve and  thirty-six  weeks
ended  October  12, 1996 and October 14, 1995.   These  financial
statements   are   the   responsibility  of   the   Corporation's
management.

We  conducted our review in accordance with standards established
by  the  American Institute of Certified Public  Accountants.   A
review  of interim financial information consists principally  of
applying  analytical  procedures to financial data and of  making
inquiries  of  persons responsible for financial  and  accounting
matters.   It  is  substantially less  in  scope  than  an  audit
conducted   in   accordance  with  generally  accepted   auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion
regarding   the   financial  statements   taken   as   a   whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based   on   our  review,  we  are  not  aware  of  any  material
modifications that should be made to such consolidated  financial
statements  for them to be in conformity with generally  accepted
accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing  standards, the consolidated balance  sheet  of  General
Nutrition  Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries  as  of  February  3,
1996,  and  the  related consolidated statements  of  operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein); and in our report dated March  21,  1996,  we
expressed  an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.   In our opinion, the information set  forth  in  the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 3, 1996 is
fairly  stated,  in  all material respects, in  relation  to  the
consolidated balance sheet from which it is derived.



Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
November 22, 1996
#### Shigekane v. Rainbow Chevrolet, Inc.

17913

4/30/97

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded in part
# C_2019230EN.01003602.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Guiral Broto v EUIPO — Gastro & Soul (Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL)

(Joined Cases T-89/18 and T-90/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Applications for the EU word and figurative marks Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL - Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol - Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark - Translation - Rights of the defence - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2019/C 230/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ramón Guiral Broto (Marbella, Spain) (represented by: J.L. de Castro Hermida, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gastro & Soul GmbH (Hildesheim, Germany)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 (Cases R 1095/2017-4 and R 1096/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2017 (Cases R 1095/2017-4 and R 1096/2017-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Ramón Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2017 (Cases R 1095/2017-4 and R 1096/2017-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Ramón Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul GmbH;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO and Mr Guiral Broto each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO and Mr Guiral Broto each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
# C_2021079EN.01003001.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/30

---

Order of the General Court of 19 January 2021 — Umweltinstitut München v Commission

(Case T-712/18) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a meeting of the Joint Management Committee for Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures established by the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, on the one hand, and the European Union and its Member States, on the other hand (CETA) - Refusal of partial access - Disclosure of the requested document after the appeal has been lodged - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 79/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Umweltinstitut München-Verein zur Erforschung und Verminderung der Umweltbelastung eV (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. John, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar, F. Erlbacher and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 6539 final of 2 October 2018 refusing access to certain documents relating to the meeting of the Joint Management Committee for Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures established by the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, on the one hand, and the European Union and its Member States, on the other hand, (CETA) signed in Brussels on 30 October 2016, held on 26 and 27 March 2018 in Ottawa (Canada).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to rule on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,164,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,733,745
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,580,867
<PP&E>                                       1,146,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                 678,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,109,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          872,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,144
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,584,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,109,623
<SALES>                                      3,674,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,674,003
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,584,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                192,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            192,577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,577
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01




</TABLE>
# C_2019139EN.01005701.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/57

---

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — SFIE-PE v Parliament

(Case T-401/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Interpreters’ strike - Measures requisitioning interpreters adopted by the European Parliament - Measure not open to challenge - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens — Section du Parlement européen (SFIE-PE) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 263 and 268 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment of the decision of 2 July 2018 of the Director General of Personnel of the Parliament requisitioning interpreters and conference interpreters for 3 July 2018 and the subsequent decisions of the Director General of Personnel of the Parliament requisitioning interpreters and conference interpreters for 4, 5,10 and 11 July 2018 and, second, an order that the Parliament make good the non-pecuniary harm caused by those decisions assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | The Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens — Section du Parlement européen (SFIE-PE) shall pay the costs, including the costs of the interim proceedings, with the exception of those related to the application for leave to intervene made by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens — Section du Parlement européen (SFIE-PE) shall pay the costs, including the costs of the interim proceedings, with the exception of those related to the application for leave to intervene made by the Council.

| 4. | The SFPI-PE, the European Parliament and the Council shall each bear their own costs of the application for leave to intervene made by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The SFPI-PE, the European Parliament and the Council shall each bear their own costs of the application for leave to intervene made by the Council.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.

---
UTl"GSYMllOl

# co 

# :;;;~~ 7,;/u)" Federal Aviation Administration DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-13-P)

Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. Ainvorthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-9-14, DC-9-15

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) forthe 14CFR Part 39

and DC-9-15F Airplanes; andMndel DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 Sene (Docket No. FAA-2010-0705; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-206-AD; Amendme 

## 319~.'t~~D

2010_1.~110 R1N2120-AA64

products listed above. That AD currently requires repetitive high frequency eddy curre OllTlNG SY"OOL inspections to detect cracking inthe vertical radius (also known as the "vertical leg") 0 ''''TIAL.S'~LG the upper cap ofthe center wing rear spar, and repair ifnecessary. This new AD expan ATH the area tobe inspected by including inspections to detect cracking ofthe horizontal "OUT'NG SYMHOL flange ofthe upper cap ofthe left and right center wing rear spar, and repair ifnecessar ~ITIAI.SISIG This new AD also adds certain airplanes to the applicability. This AD was prompted by IJATE reports ofcracking inthe vertical radius ofthe upper cap ofthe center wing rear spar, al =,NGSYMBOL the horizontal flange on the inboard side ofthe ofthe rear spar upper cap, which resulte 

### .,r,,,...,,,<> from stress corrosion. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking inthe vertical leg or the horizontal flange ofthe upper cap ofthe left orright center wing rear

# '--,ru""""",-
1RolfTl>«i 'YMIlOL spar, which could cause apossible fuel leak, damage to the wing skin, and structural failure ofthe upper cap, and result inreduced structural integrity ofthe airplane.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         322,409                  89,941
<SECURITIES>                                   134,240                 110,245
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,550                  72,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,015                   3,500
<INVENTORY>                                     37,532                  26,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               653,870                 334,515
<PP&E>                                         190,922                 134,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,885                  52,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,834,973                 543,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,009                  39,052
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,795                   1,709
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,069,411                 500,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,834,973                 543,069
<SALES>                                        303,679                 200,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,679                 200,982
<CGS>                                          105,697                  75,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,016                 147,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,840                     102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,413                  61,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,113                  19,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,300                  41,780
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,300                  41,780
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09                    0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09                    0.24


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rally's Hamburgers, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-33367, 33-39419, 33-62792 and 33-66978) on Form S-8 of Rally's
Hamburgers, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Rally's Hamburgers, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 28, 1998, and the related consolidated statement of operations and
comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended
December 28, 1998, which report appears in the December 28, 1998, annual report
on Form 10-K/A of Rally's Hamburgers, Inc.

                                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Tampa, Florida
May 28, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
L. Stansberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael L. Stansberry
--------------------------------

Michael L. Stansberry
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002
September 6, 2000

22601

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
# C_2021044EN.01004502.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Bawtry Carbon International v Commission

(Case T-637/18) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Environment - Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures - Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

(2021/C 44/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bawtry Carbon International Ltd (Doncaster, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, M. Grunchard, S. Saez Moreno and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin, R. Lindenthal and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent), European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the adoption of Commission Regulation (EU) No 944/2013 of 2 October 2013 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (OJ 2013 L 261, p. 5), in so far as that regulation classified pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) and Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) substance.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bawtry Carbon International Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bawtry Carbon International Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.

---
#### State v. Iosefa

16217

10/5/94

Dismissed

77 Hawai'i 177, 880 P.2d 1224
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 2, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854099
<NAME>                        Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.000
<CASH>                                                $277
<SECURITIES>                                         3,472
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (489)
<INVENTORY>                                          1,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,803
<PP&E>                                               6,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (6,126)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       8,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,282
<BONDS>                                                179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                20
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         8,020
<SALES>                                              7,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     7,951
<CGS>                                                3,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,883)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.95)



</TABLE>