Appendix A 

UAM Base-Year Model Performance Statistics 

 and Graphical Evaluation 
Statistical Analyses
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df SubRegional Descriptions  SubRegion 000 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CATI Catalina Isl (AV) 44 24 368.338 3696.859  CATA Catalina AP (AV) 43 25 360.827 3701.062  CLEM San ClemenSDCAPCD 43 13 360.772 3642.687  ROSA Rosa 11 38 201.011 3767.582  SNI San Nicholas Island 23 21 260.383 3682.870  SubRegion 001 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  LOMP Lompoc-4350 Constell 7 54 182.435 3845.052  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 19 47 241.171 3813.608  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 4 71 167.308 3932.630  CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 25 46 274.784 3809.034  ECSP El Capitan State Par 15 48 222.842 3815.987  GAVE Gaviota East-N Of Ch 12 48 206.051 3818.354  GAVW Gaviota West-NW Of C 12 48 206.051 3818.354  GCTY Grover City-9 Le Sag 5 63 170.360 3891.772  GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 12 49 207.757 3823.853  GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 12 48 207.582 3818.305  LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 15 48 221.421 3819.730  LOSP Los Padres NF-Paradi 19 49 244.541 3824.616  LPHS Lompoc-HS&P Facility 8 54 187.080 3846.744  LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 7 52 183.708 3837.602  MOBY Morro Bay-Morro Bay 2 69 156.221 3920.083  NIPO Nipomo-1300 Guadalup 5 61 174.522 3880.511  PTCL Point Conception Lig 7 48 183.013 3817.260  SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 21 47 251.846 3811.467  SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 4 67 168.001 3910.379  SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 8 59 186.376 3870.837  SYAP Santa Ynez-Airport R 14 51 218.752 3832.766  UCSB UCSB West Campus-Arc 18 47 236.471 3810.039  VBPP Vandenberg AFB-Sts P 4 51 168.222 3832.590  SubRegion 002 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 31 43 303.549 3791.740  EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 28 44 286.748 3795.806  OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 29 47 291.723 3812.339  PRTG Piru-2SW, 2815 Teleg 37 46 332.978 3805.960  SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 40 43 345.024 3792.811  THOS Oak View-5500 Casita 26 46 279.337 3807.076  TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 36 42 328.007 3785.712  LAGP Point Mugu USN 32 40 309.499 3775.930  SubRegion 003 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km) 
 ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- --------- 

 BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 47 41 380.176 3781.205  RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 43 41 360.232 3783.329  CALB Calabasas (AV) 41 40 351.388 3779.520  CSUN Van Nuys NOAA 43 42 362.563 3786.899  SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 42 46 358.986 3806.024  WILS Mount WilsCE-CERT 51 42 402.367 3787.571  SubRegion 004 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  LKAR Lake Arrowhead-27400 67 42 481.577 3786.003  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 54 40 415.477 3777.125  BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 73 35 512.325 3752.730  FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 61 39 453.879 3773.162  GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 55 40 421.624 3777.071  LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 64 30 469.097 3725.054  LGRE Crestline-Lake Grego 66 42 475.441 3787.865  PERR Perris-237 .5 N "D" 66 32 478.397 3737.963  PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 60 46 449.457 3808.298  POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 57 38 430.791 3769.607  RDLD Redlands-500 N. Dear 68 38 486.156 3767.515  RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 63 37 461.521 3762.040  SANB San Bernardino-24302 66 39 475.402 3773.081  SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 58 39 438.493 3771.402  ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 59 39 440.031 3771.392  CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 62 45 458.830 3803.663  CAJC Cajon MDAQMD 62 45 458.894 3800.736  MBLD Azusa CARB 59 42 442.827 3788.654  TCCC Temecula SCAQMD 68 26 485.065 3709.556  SubRegion 005 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 54 33 416.706 3741.999  CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 54 30 415.015 3725.381  ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 58 28 436.612 3719.670  HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 45 35 373.661 3753.563  LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 48 39 386.188 3770.040  LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 53 35 412.180 3753.128  LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 48 35 389.069 3753.370  NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 49 33 390.482 3742.264  PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 50 39 398.512 3771.747  VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 44 38 366.166 3768.454  PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 51 37 403.031 3762.458  PVSP Palos Verdes (AV) 46 31 376.317 3734.613  SubRegion 006 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ALPN Alpine-2300 Victoria 75 11 523.403 3630.800  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 70 6 495.309 3608.603  DMMC Del Mar-Miracosta Co 66 14 476.632 3645.581  ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 72 10 506.243 3627.079  ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 69 17 493.780 3664.031  OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 64 19 465.824 3673.327  OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 72 5 506.257 3604.909  SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 68 11 489.079 3630.779  SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 68 8 485.940 3617.850 
 BLKM Black MounSDCAPCD 68 14 489.203 3649.069 

 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 63 20 463.087 3675.247  REDM Fallbrook SDCAPCD 67 24 482.254 3695.518  SMPK Deer SprinSDCAPCD 68 19 487.881 3671.612  SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 66 11 476.604 3633.479  TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 71 4 502.161 3595.415  TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 68 4 489.151 3597.222  TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 71 4 501.409 3598.441  VCEN Valley CenSDCAPCD 70 20 497.722 3676.871  WSPR Warner SprSDCAPCD 76 22 529.371 3686.862  SubRegion 007 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 34 68 318.335 3917.192  BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 34 67 315.231 3913.556  ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 38 64 337.652 3896.481  EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 37 67 331.858 3911.381  OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 34 69 318.448 3922.739  SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 29 71 294.407 3930.657  SubRegion 008 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 50 60 396.640 3878.977  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 65 46 473.963 3808.197  LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 50 52 397.707 3838.298  VICT Victorville-14029 Am 65 48 470.773 3817.551  TEHP Monolith CE-CERT 45 62 374.316 3886.345  SubRegion 009 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 99 8 643.784 3615.183  CLXC Calexico-900 Grant S 99 8 640.658 3615.138  EC9S El Centro-150 9th St 98 10 635.792 3628.008  INDO Indio-46-990 Jackson 85 30 574.140 3728.987  JOSH Joshua Tree National 82 38 556.905 3769.525  MEXI Mexicali 1 101 7 650.302 3610.045  MEXT Mexicali 2 101 5 654.966 3604.664  MEXU Mexicali 3 100 7 645.747 3611.053  PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 79 34 543.172 3745.428  TNPM Twentynine Palms-607 88 40 587.597 3777.153  CLXE Calexico CARB 101 8 650.856 3616.181  MEXA Mexicali CARB 100 7 647.525 3614.356 
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0000 SubRegion 20 10.0 20 3.8 13 -7 0.38 -4.5 4.5 -0.56 0.56 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 12.8 14 -6 1.28 (at cell 40 x 37)  CATA Catalina AP (AV) 1 7.0 0 3.5 0 0 0.49 -0.5 0.5 -11.15 11.15 -99.0 CLEM San ClemenSDCAPCD 19 10.0 20 3.8 13 -7 0.38 -0.6 0.6 -0.59 0.59 -0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 7 8.0 13 6.0 16 3 0.76 -1.7 1.7 -0.23 0.23 0.2 Subregional Peak: 8.8 14 1 1.11 (at cell 08 x 66)  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 4 8.0 13 5.9 14 1 0.74 -0.3 0.3 -0.40 0.40 0.8 LOSP Los Padres NF-Paradi 3 7.0 15 6.0 16 1 0.86 -0.2 0.2 -0.53 0.53 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 30 9.0 12 9.6 16 4 1.07 -2.3 2.7 -0.29 0.34 -0.1 Subregional Peak: 9.9 15 3 1.10 (at cell 39 x 43)  OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 3 8.0 11 5.1 12 1 0.63 -0.4 0.4 -2.94 3.43 0.7 PRTG Piru-2SW, 2815 Teleg 3 7.0 11 6.5 13 2 0.93 -0.2 0.2 -2.94 3.43 0.7
 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 7 9.0 12 9.6 16 4 1.07 -0.1 0.3 -1.26 1.47 -0.2

 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 3 7.0 12 5.9 14 2 0.84 -0.2 0.2 -2.94 3.43 -99.0 LAGP Point Mugu USN 14 9.0 11 6.3 13 2 0.70 -0.4 0.4 -0.63 0.73 -0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 23 10.0 13 12.0 18 5 1.20 -0.5 2.1 -0.05 0.27 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 15.7 15 2 1.57 (at cell 42 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 2 9.0 13 6.2 13 0 0.69 -0.3 0.3 -0.58 3.08 -99.0 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 3 8.0 12 8.9 14 2 1.12 -0.1 0.3 -0.39 2.06 -0.8 CALB Calabasas (AV) 3 8.0 11 8.9 13 2 1.11 -0.1 0.3 -0.39 2.06 -0.8 CSUN Van Nuys NOAA 4 10.0 13 8.5 14 1 0.85 -0.3 0.3 -0.29 1.54 0.3 SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 4 10.0 13 8.9 15 2 0.89 -0.1 0.1 -0.29 1.54 0.5 WILS Mount WilsCE-CERT 7 9.0 14 12.0 18 4 1.33 0.2 0.3 -0.17 0.88 -0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 134 14.0 16 17.8 18 2 1.27 1.0 2.6 0.13 0.31 0.3 Subregional Peak: 18.7 17 1 1.33 (at cell 74 x 36)  LKAR Lake Arrowhead-27400 16 14.0 16 17.8 18 2 1.27 0.1 0.5 1.12 2.62 0.1 AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 5 10.0 14 8.9 14 0 0.89 -0.1 0.1 3.58 8.39 0.5 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 12 13.0 15 17.2 17 2 1.32 0.1 0.3 1.49 3.50 0.7 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 5 10.0 14 11.3 16 2 1.13 0.1 0.3 3.58 8.39 -0.2 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 6 10.0 12 10.1 15 3 1.01 0.0 0.1 2.98 6.99 0.5 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 9 10.0 13 14.3 15 2 1.43 0.5 0.6 1.99 4.66 0.3 LGRE Crestline-Lake Grego 8 12.0 14 16.5 17 3 1.37 0.3 0.3 2.24 5.24 -0.0 PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 10 9.0 18 10.2 19 1 1.13 0.0 0.2 1.79 4.19 0.2 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 3 9.0 13 8.6 14 1 0.96 0.0 0.2 5.96 13.98 0.0 RDLD Redlands-500 N. Dear 9 12.0 14 17.0 16 2 1.41 0.3 0.3 1.99 4.66 0.5 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 8 12.0 15 12.6 14 -1 1.05 0.1 0.2 2.24 5.24 0.6 SANB San Bernardino-24302 6 11.0 14 14.0 15 1 1.27 0.1 0.3 2.98 6.99 0.0 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 4 9.0 13 10.6 16 3 1.18 0.2 0.3 4.47 10.49 -0.9 ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 4 9.0 14 10.7 16 2 1.19 0.2 0.2 4.47 10.49 0.1
 CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 2 8.0 14 8.3 15 1 1.04 0.0 0.0 8.94 20.97 -99.0

 CAJC Cajon MDAQMD 9 10.0 14 8.8 15 1 0.88 -0.3 0.3 1.99 4.66 0.6 MBLD Azusa CARB 15 13.0 14 17.4 17 3 1.34 0.1 0.3 1.19 2.80 0.2 TCCC Temecula SCAQMD 3 8.0 18 13.3 17 -1 1.67 0.7 0.7 5.96 13.98 0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 19 10.0 14 8.8 15 1 0.88 -1.5 1.9 -0.19 0.23 0.3 Subregional Peak: 14.7 17 3 1.47 (at cell 60 x 32)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 2 7.0 13 8.8 15 2 1.26 0.2 0.2 -1.77 2.22 -99.0 ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 4 10.0 14 7.7 13 -1 0.77 -0.1 0.1 -0.88 1.11 0.6 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 2 8.0 13 4.2 13 0 0.53 -0.5 0.5 -1.77 2.22 -99.0 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 1 9.0 14 7.2 14 0 0.80 -0.2 0.2 -3.54 4.44 -99.0 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 5 9.0 14 5.7 12 -2 0.63 -0.3 0.3 -0.71 0.89 -0.6 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 5 9.0 13 7.5 14 1 0.83 -0.2 0.2 -0.71 0.89 0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 49 11.0 0 11.1 13 13 1.01 -2.3 2.8 -0.28 0.35 -0.3 Subregional Peak: 14.8 17 17 1.35 (at cell 81 x 06)  ALPN Alpine-2300 Victoria 4 9.0 11 9.1 13 2 1.01 0.0 0.2 -3.38 4.23 -0.6 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 4 8.0 16 6.4 14 -2 0.80 -0.4 0.4 -3.38 4.23 -0.3 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 3 9.0 15 4.8 14 -1 0.54 -0.4 0.4 -4.51 5.64 -0.5 BLKM Black MounSDCAPCD 9 11.0 0 8.0 13 13 0.72 -0.6 0.6 -1.50 1.88 -0.7 REDM Fallbrook SDCAPCD 14 9.0 10 11.1 13 3 1.23 -0.1 0.2 -0.97 1.21 0.3 SMPK Deer SprinSDCAPCD 9 9.0 15 6.3 12 -3 0.71 -0.3 0.3 -1.50 1.88 -0.1 SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 1 8.0 17 3.9 17 0 0.49 -0.5 0.5 -13.53 16.91 -99.0 VCEN Valley CenSDCAPCD 1 7.0 11 8.1 11 0 1.16 0.2 0.2 -13.53 16.91 -99.0 WSPR Warner SprSDCAPCD 4 8.0 13 5.7 12 -1 0.71 -0.2 0.2 -3.38 4.23 -0.9
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 47 12.0 15 8.3 17 2 0.69 -2.1 2.2 -0.24 0.26 0.1 Subregional Peak: 11.7 17 2 0.97 (at cell 42 x 66)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 8 9.0 11 6.8 15 4 0.76 -0.3 0.3 -1.44 1.52 -0.8 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 9 9.0 11 7.2 15 4 0.80 -0.3 0.3 -1.28 1.36 -0.1 ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 11 12.0 15 8.3 17 2 0.69 -0.2 0.2 -1.05 1.11 0.4 EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 8 12.0 13 8.2 17 4 0.68 -0.1 0.2 -1.44 1.52 0.0 OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 7 8.0 11 6.4 14 3 0.80 -0.3 0.3 -1.64 1.74 -0.1 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 4 8.0 16 5.8 16 0 0.72 -0.2 0.2 -2.88 3.05 0.8 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 26 10.0 17 9.8 17 0 0.98 -1.6 2.0 -0.20 0.25 0.1 Subregional Peak: 16.2 19 2 1.62 (at cell 66 x 44)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 8 10.0 17 7.0 16 -1 0.70 -0.3 0.3 -0.65 0.82 0.8 HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 6 9.0 16 9.8 17 1 1.08 0.1 0.1 -0.86 1.10 0.4 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 3 8.0 10 5.4 11 1 0.67 -0.3 0.3 -1.72 2.19 0.0 TEHP Monolith CE-CERT 9 9.0 17 6.9 16 -1 0.76 -0.2 0.2 -0.57 0.73 0.1
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 70 12.0 19 12.9 15 -4 1.07 -1.6 2.9 -0.18 0.37 0.0 Subregional Peak: 17.9 17 -2 1.49 (at cell 75 x 36)  CLXC Calexico-900 Grant S 21 10.0 13 8.7 14 1 0.87 -0.5 0.5 -0.59 1.23 0.8 EC9S El Centro-150 9th St 9 7.0 10 7.9 14 4 1.13 -0.1 0.1 -1.38 2.86 0.8 JOSH Joshua Tree National 12 12.0 19 8.4 20 1 0.70 -0.2 0.2 -1.04 2.15 0.7 MEXI Mexicali 1 8 8.0 8 11.9 16 8 1.49 0.0 0.5 -1.55 3.22 -0.4 MEXT Mexicali 2 5 10.0 21 12.9 15 -6 1.29 0.4 0.6 -2.49 5.15 -0.8 PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 8 11.0 18 8.6 19 1 0.78 -0.1 0.1 -1.55 3.22 0.8 MEXA Mexicali CARB 7 8.0 13 11.1 15 2 1.39 0.3 0.3 -1.78 3.68 -0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0000 SubRegion 14 9.0 19 5.2 20 1 0.58 -3.0 3.0 -0.41 0.41 -0.1 Subregional Peak: 17.4 19 0 1.94 (at cell 56 x 25)  CATI Catalina Isl (AV) 2 7.0 17 4.4 18 1 0.62 -0.4 0.4 -2.90 2.90 -99.0 CATA Catalina AP (AV) 6 7.0 13 5.2 20 7 0.74 -0.4 0.4 -0.97 0.97 -99.0 CLEM San ClemenSDCAPCD 6 9.0 19 4.1 19 0 0.45 -0.5 0.5 -0.97 0.97 0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r) 
 ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----

 0001 SubRegion 30 10.0 14 10.0 16 2 1.00 -1.5 2.0 -0.18 0.26 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 22.6 14 0 2.26 (at cell 14 x 62)  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 3 7.0 11 5.5 13 2 0.78 -0.3 0.3 -1.84 2.63 -99.0 CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 5 10.0 14 6.9 14 0 0.69 -0.2 0.2 -1.11 1.58 0.8 GAVE Gaviota East-N Of Ch 1 7.0 16 5.8 16 0 0.83 -0.2 0.2 -5.53 7.89 -99.0 GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 2 7.0 10 6.6 13 3 0.94 -0.2 0.2 -2.77 3.94 -99.0 GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 1 7.0 16 5.9 16 0 0.84 -0.2 0.2 -5.53 7.89 -99.0 LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 4 7.0 13 10.0 16 3 1.43 0.1 0.3 -1.38 1.97 -99.0 LOSP Los Padres NF-Paradi 10 10.0 14 9.5 18 4 0.95 -0.2 0.3 -0.55 0.79 -0.2 SYAP Santa Ynez-Airport R 4 8.0 10 5.2 13 3 0.64 -0.4 0.4 -1.38 1.97 -0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 47 10.0 14 7.2 15 1 0.72 -2.4 2.4 -0.29 0.30 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 11.7 16 2 1.17 (at cell 39 x 48)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 1 7.0 15 6.2 15 0 0.89 -0.1 0.1 -13.83 13.94 -99.0 OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 2 7.0 11 5.1 11 0 0.72 -0.3 0.3 -6.91 6.97 -99.0 PRTG Piru-2SW, 2815 Teleg 4 8.0 13 6.6 15 2 0.83 -0.2 0.2 -3.46 3.49 -0.3 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 10 9.0 13 7.2 15 2 0.80 -0.2 0.2 -1.38 1.39 0.1 THOS Oak View-5500 Casita 10 10.0 14 7.0 18 4 0.70 -0.2 0.2 -1.38 1.39 0.5 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 6 8.0 17 6.1 13 -4 0.76 -0.2 0.2 -2.30 2.32 -0.3 LAGP Point Mugu USN 14 10.0 18 5.3 15 -3 0.53 -0.5 0.5 -0.99 1.00 -0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 32 14.0 11 11.2 17 6 0.80 -2.2 3.0 -0.20 0.32 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 11.7 18 7 0.84 (at cell 52 x 41)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 5 11.0 14 9.6 16 2 0.87 -0.1 0.2 -1.30 2.08 0.1 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 3 12.0 12 7.7 13 1 0.64 -0.3 0.3 -2.17 3.47 -0.1 CALB Calabasas (AV) 9 11.0 11 8.2 15 4 0.75 -0.4 0.4 -0.72 1.16 0.2 CSUN Van Nuys NOAA 9 14.0 11 9.3 14 3 0.66 -0.2 0.4 -0.72 1.16 -0.6
 SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 2 9.0 12 7.1 12 0 0.79 -0.1 0.1 -3.26 5.20 -99.0

 WILS Mount WilsCE-CERT 4 9.0 4 11.2 17 13 1.25 0.1 0.3 -1.63 2.60 -0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 140 19.0 14 19.3 17 3 1.01 -0.6 2.4 -0.04 0.25 0.2 Subregional Peak: 19.9 17 3 1.05 (at cell 63 x 30)  LKAR Lake Arrowhead-27400 19 15.0 15 8.4 14 -1 0.56 -0.3 0.3 -0.28 1.87 0.3 AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 6 12.0 12 8.4 16 4 0.70 -0.2 0.2 -0.88 5.91 -0.4 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 14 12.0 17 14.7 17 0 1.22 0.2 0.3 -0.38 2.53 0.6 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 8 13.0 14 11.3 16 2 0.87 0.0 0.2 -0.66 4.44 0.4 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 2 10.0 12 7.7 12 0 0.77 -0.2 0.2 -2.64 17.74 -99.0 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 10 11.0 14 19.3 17 3 1.75 0.5 0.5 -0.53 3.55 0.7 LGRE Crestline-Lake Grego 8 13.0 14 8.0 14 0 0.62 -0.1 0.2 -0.66 4.44 0.3 PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 8 7.0 0 7.9 0 0 1.13 -0.1 0.2 -0.66 4.44 -99.0 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 4 12.0 13 9.4 13 0 0.79 0.1 0.2 -1.32 8.87 0.6 RDLD Redlands-500 N. Dear 8 17.0 15 13.3 16 1 0.78 0.0 0.2 -0.66 4.44 0.2 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 8 19.0 14 11.4 15 1 0.60 -0.2 0.2 -0.66 4.44 0.5 SANB San Bernardino-24302 9 15.0 14 12.6 17 3 0.84 0.0 0.2 -0.59 3.94 0.0 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 7 11.0 13 11.1 14 1 1.01 -0.1 0.1 -0.75 5.07 0.7 ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 7 11.0 14 11.0 14 0 1.00 0.0 0.0 -0.75 5.07 0.9 CAJC Cajon MDAQMD 4 7.0 13 6.7 14 1 0.96 -0.1 0.1 -1.32 8.87 -99.0 MBLD Azusa CARB 12 12.0 14 6.2 0 -14 0.52 -0.4 0.4 -0.44 2.96 -0.3 TCCC Temecula SCAQMD 6 10.0 15 15.6 18 3 1.56 0.6 0.6 -0.88 5.91 0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 33 11.0 14 12.2 15 1 1.11 -2.0 2.7 -0.23 0.32 0.2 Subregional Peak: 19.5 15 1 1.77 (at cell 57 x 27)  ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 5 11.0 14 12.2 15 1 1.11 0.1 0.3 -1.51 2.14 0.0 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 4 9.0 14 8.1 15 1 0.90 -0.2 0.3 -1.88 2.67 0.0 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 2 7.0 13 7.5 13 0 1.07 0.1 0.1 -3.77 5.35 -99.0 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 7 11.0 12 8.8 16 4 0.80 -0.3 0.4 -1.08 1.53 -0.0 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 4 9.0 13 9.3 14 1 1.03 -0.3 0.3 -1.88 2.67 0.9
 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 5 9.0 11 6.9 15 4 0.77 -0.4 0.4 -1.51 2.14 -0.4

 PVSP Palos Verdes (AV) 6 9.0 19 8.6 14 -5 0.96 -0.3 0.4 -1.26 1.78 -0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 104 12.0 9 16.1 18 9 1.34 0.1 2.5 0.02 0.30 0.1 Subregional Peak: 20.0 18 9 1.67 (at cell 64 x 25)  ALPN Alpine-2300 Victoria 7 11.0 13 13.3 14 1 1.21 0.3 0.3 0.26 4.45 0.4 CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 6 10.0 11 8.7 13 2 0.87 -0.2 0.2 0.30 5.20 -0.0 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 3 10.0 12 9.9 14 2 0.99 0.2 0.3 0.60 10.39 -0.9 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 3 8.0 11 7.9 18 7 0.99 -0.1 0.1 0.60 10.39 -0.3 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 1 7.0 12 8.3 12 0 1.18 0.2 0.2 1.81 31.17 -99.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 5 12.0 9 7.9 12 3 0.66 -0.3 0.3 0.36 6.23 -0.3 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 5 10.0 14 7.2 12 -2 0.72 -0.2 0.2 0.36 6.23 0.2 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 3 9.0 14 7.5 13 -1 0.84 -0.1 0.2 0.60 10.39 -0.0 BLKM Black MounSDCAPCD 12 10.0 13 9.2 10 -3 0.92 -0.1 0.2 0.15 2.60 0.3 REDM Fallbrook SDCAPCD 14 12.0 14 16.1 18 4 1.34 0.3 0.4 0.13 2.23 0.1 SMPK Deer SprinSDCAPCD 12 10.0 12 10.3 19 7 1.03 0.0 0.3 0.15 2.60 0.2 SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 7 10.0 13 6.3 13 0 0.63 -0.5 0.5 0.26 4.45 0.2 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 5 9.0 12 9.8 13 1 1.09 -0.1 0.2 0.36 6.23 0.0 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 4 10.0 9 7.6 12 3 0.76 -0.5 0.5 0.45 7.79 -0.3 VCEN Valley CenSDCAPCD 6 10.0 15 11.6 14 -1 1.16 0.3 0.3 0.30 5.20 0.3 WSPR Warner SprSDCAPCD 11 10.0 17 11.3 11 -6 1.13 0.3 0.3 0.16 2.83 -0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 59 13.0 15 9.0 16 1 0.70 -3.1 3.1 -0.35 0.36 0.2 Subregional Peak: 10.6 17 2 0.82 (at cell 44 x 66)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 9 10.0 11 7.2 15 4 0.72 -0.3 0.4 -2.32 2.36 -0.4 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 10 10.0 11 7.4 15 4 0.74 -0.4 0.4 -2.09 2.12 0.3 ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 12 13.0 15 7.8 16 1 0.60 -0.3 0.3 -1.74 1.77 0.5 EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 10 11.0 12 9.0 16 4 0.82 -0.3 0.3 -2.09 2.12 0.2 OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 9 9.0 11 6.8 16 5 0.75 -0.4 0.4 -2.32 2.36 0.3
 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 9 9.0 12 6.0 16 4 0.67 -0.3 0.3 -2.32 2.36 0.6

 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 46 11.0 17 8.0 15 -2 0.73 -2.0 2.1 -0.26 0.27 0.1 Subregional Peak: 10.4 18 1 0.94 (at cell 47 x 66)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 16 11.0 17 6.9 20 3 0.62 -0.3 0.3 -0.75 0.79 0.5 HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 10 7.0 8 8.0 15 7 1.14 -0.2 0.2 -1.20 1.26 -99.0 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 6 7.0 9 7.2 10 1 1.03 -0.2 0.2 -2.00 2.11 -99.0 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 11 8.0 10 6.7 14 4 0.83 -0.3 0.3 -1.09 1.15 -0.2 TEHP Monolith CE-CERT 3 8.0 12 5.2 12 0 0.65 -0.4 0.4 -4.00 4.21 0.8 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 80 11.0 11 12.8 16 5 1.16 -0.9 2.5 -0.11 0.33 0.0 Subregional Peak: 18.0 18 7 1.63 (at cell 103 x 06)  CLXC Calexico-900 Grant S 23 10.0 11 8.6 14 3 0.86 -0.4 0.4 -0.38 1.16 0.7 EC9S El Centro-150 9th St 6 7.0 9 7.5 14 5 1.08 -0.1 0.2 -1.45 4.43 0.7 INDO Indio-46-990 Jackson 3 7.0 11 9.3 13 2 1.33 0.3 0.3 -2.90 8.87 -99.0 JOSH Joshua Tree National 12 8.0 0 6.5 8 8 0.81 -0.2 0.2 -0.72 2.22 -0.1 MEXI Mexicali 1 11 8.0 7 12.4 15 8 1.55 0.1 0.4 -0.79 2.42 0.0 MEXT Mexicali 2 6 11.0 11 12.8 16 5 1.16 0.1 0.4 -1.45 4.43 -0.1 MEXU Mexicali 3 5 7.0 12 10.8 15 3 1.54 0.4 0.4 -1.74 5.32 -0.1 PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 7 9.0 19 9.3 18 -1 1.04 0.0 0.2 -1.24 3.80 0.5 MEXA Mexicali CARB 7 7.0 11 9.9 15 4 1.42 0.2 0.3 -1.24 3.80 -99.0
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0000 SubRegion 6 8.0 3 4.1 8 5 0.52 -3.4 3.4 -0.45 0.45 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 18.0 18 15 2.26 (at cell 38 x 37)  CLEM San ClemenSDCAPCD 6 8.0 3 4.1 8 5 0.52 -0.5 0.5 -0.45 0.45 -0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 27 9.0 11 7.5 14 3 0.84 -2.0 2.0 -0.25 0.25 0.2 Subregional Peak: 20.5 17 6 2.28 (at cell 12 x 64)  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 4 9.0 11 6.0 14 3 0.66 -0.3 0.3 -1.66 1.70 -0.5 CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 2 8.0 13 7.5 14 1 0.94 0.0 0.1 -3.33 3.41 -99.0 GAVE Gaviota East-N Of Ch 2 7.0 13 5.5 14 1 0.79 -0.2 0.2 -3.33 3.41 -99.0 GAVW Gaviota West-NW Of C 2 7.0 13 5.5 14 1 0.79 -0.2 0.2 -3.33 3.41 -99.0 GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 5 8.0 13 5.7 15 2 0.72 -0.3 0.3 -1.33 1.36 0.2 LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 4 7.0 11 5.3 14 3 0.76 -0.3 0.3 -1.66 1.70 -99.0 LOSP Los Padres NF-Paradi 8 9.0 13 6.5 12 -1 0.73 -0.2 0.2 -0.83 0.85 -0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 49 13.0 11 11.0 14 3 0.85 -1.3 2.2 -0.13 0.25 0.2
 Subregional Peak: 27.6 15 4 2.12 (at cell 38 x 48) 

 PRTG Piru-2SW, 2815 Teleg 8 11.0 15 10.0 14 -1 0.91 0.0 0.1 -0.77 1.56 0.3 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 10 13.0 11 11.0 14 3 0.85 -0.2 0.3 -0.62 1.25 0.1 THOS Oak View-5500 Casita 10 9.0 16 8.2 17 1 0.91 -0.1 0.1 -0.62 1.25 -0.3 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 7 8.0 10 10.8 16 6 1.35 0.2 0.3 -0.88 1.78 -0.4 LAGP Point Mugu USN 14 11.0 18 8.9 14 -4 0.81 -0.3 0.4 -0.44 0.89 0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 34 13.0 12 15.4 17 5 1.18 0.0 4.0 0.06 0.44 -0.3 Subregional Peak: 24.9 16 4 1.91 (at cell 39 x 49)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 4 9.0 12 10.0 14 2 1.11 -0.1 0.2 0.49 3.73 0.2 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 4 9.0 12 11.4 14 2 1.26 0.0 0.3 0.49 3.73 -0.7 CALB Calabasas (AV) 8 11.0 11 15.4 17 6 1.40 0.3 0.5 0.24 1.86 -0.8 CSUN Van Nuys NOAA 7 12.0 11 13.7 15 4 1.14 -0.2 0.5 0.28 2.13 -0.7 SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 8 13.0 12 15.3 16 4 1.17 0.0 0.5 0.24 1.86 -0.3 WILS Mount WilsCE-CERT 3 10.0 14 13.2 15 1 1.32 0.4 0.4 0.65 4.97 0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 143 17.0 16 18.6 18 2 1.10 1.4 3.5 0.18 0.40 0.2 Subregional Peak: 19.3 17 1 1.14 (at cell 63 x 42)  LKAR Lake Arrowhead-27400 23 17.0 16 18.0 19 3 1.06 -0.2 0.4 1.13 2.48 0.7 AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 3 9.0 11 10.0 13 2 1.11 -0.2 0.3 8.66 19.03 -0.9 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 9 9.0 15 10.4 18 3 1.16 0.0 0.1 2.89 6.34 0.2 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 6 12.0 13 17.2 15 2 1.43 0.3 0.6 4.33 9.52 -0.2 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 9 9.0 12 11.0 16 4 1.22 0.3 0.3 2.89 6.34 0.3 LGRE Crestline-Lake Grego 15 15.0 14 18.6 18 4 1.24 0.2 0.4 1.73 3.81 0.2 PERR Perris-237 .5 N "D" 6 13.0 14 10.2 15 1 0.78 0.0 0.1 4.33 9.52 0.6 PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 12 11.0 17 16.3 20 3 1.48 0.3 0.4 2.16 4.76 0.2 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 4 9.0 12 14.6 14 2 1.62 0.3 0.3 6.49 14.27 0.3 RDLD Redlands-500 N. Dear 8 15.0 14 11.6 16 2 0.78 -0.2 0.2 3.25 7.14 0.5
 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 6 13.0 12 14.7 15 3 1.13 0.0 0.2 4.33 9.52 0.2

 SANB San Bernardino-24302 7 14.0 13 14.9 16 3 1.07 0.1 0.3 3.71 8.16 0.2 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 5 13.0 13 16.2 15 2 1.24 0.2 0.4 5.20 11.42 -0.0 ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 5 13.0 14 16.3 15 1 1.25 0.3 0.3 5.20 11.42 0.3 CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 5 11.0 17 17.6 19 2 1.60 0.7 0.7 5.20 11.42 -0.1 CAJC Cajon MDAQMD 9 12.0 18 17.8 19 1 1.48 0.6 0.6 2.89 6.34 0.6 MBLD Azusa CARB 10 12.0 14 18.1 17 3 1.51 0.8 0.8 2.60 5.71 -0.2 TCCC Temecula SCAQMD 1 7.0 12 9.9 12 0 1.42 0.4 0.4 25.98 57.10 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 6 8.0 11 9.9 13 2 1.24 -3.0 4.4 -0.43 0.62 0.2 Subregional Peak: 17.5 15 4 2.19 (at cell 60 x 32)  PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 3 8.0 11 9.9 13 2 1.24 0.1 0.3 -0.85 1.24 -0.8 PVSP Palos Verdes (AV) 3 7.0 3 0.2 6 3 0.03 -1.0 1.0 -0.85 1.24 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 36 11.0 11 11.2 12 1 1.02 -1.0 2.1 -0.13 0.27 0.3 Subregional Peak: 19.2 17 6 1.75 (at cell 67 x 14)  ALPN Alpine-2300 Victoria 11 10.0 10 9.7 15 5 0.97 0.0 0.2 -0.41 0.90 0.5 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 2 8.0 10 9.5 11 1 1.19 0.2 0.2 -2.27 4.94 -99.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 2 8.0 9 4.5 10 1 0.57 -0.4 0.4 -2.27 4.94 -99.0 REDM Fallbrook SDCAPCD 9 10.0 10 9.6 10 0 0.96 -0.2 0.3 -0.51 1.10 0.7 SMPK Deer SprinSDCAPCD 1 8.0 9 6.9 9 0 0.86 -0.1 0.1 -4.55 9.89 -99.0 VCEN Valley CenSDCAPCD 4 11.0 11 11.2 12 1 1.02 0.2 0.2 -1.14 2.47 -0.3 WSPR Warner SprSDCAPCD 7 9.0 14 4.9 18 4 0.55 -0.4 0.4 -0.65 1.41 0.0
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 59 14.0 13 11.7 18 5 0.84 -3.1 3.3 -0.32 0.35 0.0 Subregional Peak: 12.2 18 5 0.87 (at cell 37 x 67)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 9 11.0 12 7.6 18 6 0.69 -0.4 0.4 -2.12 2.29 -0.4 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 10 11.0 13 8.7 16 3 0.79 -0.4 0.4 -1.91 2.06 0.1 ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 15 10.0 12 7.6 19 7 0.76 -0.3 0.3 -1.27 1.38 0.2 EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 10 14.0 13 11.7 18 5 0.84 -0.2 0.3 -1.91 2.06 -0.2 OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 7 10.0 12 7.5 17 5 0.75 -0.5 0.5 -2.73 2.95 -0.3 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 8 10.0 14 6.3 17 3 0.63 -0.3 0.3 -2.39 2.58 0.5 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 44 13.0 16 17.7 19 3 1.36 0.3 3.4 0.05 0.40 0.3 Subregional Peak: 20.7 19 3 1.59 (at cell 45 x 53)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 14 11.0 17 9.8 22 5 0.89 -0.3 0.3 0.15 1.25 0.4 HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 11 13.0 16 17.7 19 3 1.36 0.3 0.5 0.19 1.59 0.1 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 7 11.0 17 15.8 20 3 1.43 0.2 0.4 0.30 2.50 -0.5 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 12 13.0 17 16.8 20 3 1.29 0.2 0.4 0.18 1.46 0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: O3 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 6.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r) 
 ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----

 0009 SubRegion 30 8.0 0 8.6 14 14 1.07 -2.4 2.5 -0.32 0.34 0.3 Subregional Peak: 10.1 20 20 1.26 (at cell 74 x 40)  CLXC Calexico-900 Grant S 24 8.0 0 8.6 14 14 1.07 -0.4 0.4 -0.40 0.42 0.5 EC9S El Centro-150 9th St 1 7.0 15 8.0 15 0 1.15 0.1 0.1 -9.61 10.07 -99.0 JOSH Joshua Tree National 3 8.0 22 5.7 21 -1 0.72 -0.2 0.2 -3.20 3.36 0.2 TNPM Twentynine Palms-607 2 7.0 20 6.0 21 1 0.86 -0.2 0.2 -4.80 5.03 -99.0
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df SubRegional Descriptions  SubRegion 001 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  LOMP Lompoc-4350 Constell 7 54 182.435 3845.052  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 19 47 241.171 3813.608  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 4 71 167.308 3932.630  CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 25 46 274.784 3809.034  ECSP El Capitan State Par 15 48 222.842 3815.987  GAVE Gaviota East-N Of Ch 12 48 206.051 3818.354  GAVW Gaviota West-NW Of C 12 48 206.051 3818.354  GCTY Grover City-9 Le Sag 5 63 170.360 3891.772  GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 12 49 207.757 3823.853  GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 12 48 207.582 3818.305  LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 15 48 221.421 3819.730  LOSP Los Padres NF-Paradi 19 49 244.541 3824.616  LPHS Lompoc-HS&P Facility 8 54 187.080 3846.744  LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 7 52 183.708 3837.602  PTCL Point Conception Lig 7 48 183.013 3817.260  SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 21 47 251.846 3811.467  SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 4 67 168.001 3910.379  SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 8 59 186.376 3870.837  UCSB UCSB West Campus-Arc 18 47 236.471 3810.039  VBPP Vandenberg AFB-Sts P 4 51 168.222 3832.590  SubRegion 002 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 31 43 303.549 3791.740  EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 28 44 286.748 3795.806  OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 29 47 291.723 3812.339  SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 40 43 345.024 3792.811  THOS Oak View-5500 Casita 26 46 279.337 3807.076  TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 36 42 328.007 3785.712  SubRegion 003 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 47 41 380.176 3781.205  RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 43 41 360.232 3783.329  CALB Calabasas (AV) 41 40 351.388 3779.520  SubRegion 004 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  LKAR Lake Arrowhead-27400 67 42 481.577 3786.003  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 54 40 415.477 3777.125  BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 73 35 512.325 3752.730  FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 61 39 453.879 3773.162  GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 55 40 421.624 3777.071 
 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 64 30 469.097 3725.054 

 PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 60 46 449.457 3808.298  POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 57 38 430.791 3769.607  RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 63 37 461.521 3762.040  SANB San Bernardino-24302 66 39 475.402 3773.081  SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 58 39 438.493 3771.402  ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 59 39 440.031 3771.392  CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 62 45 458.830 3803.663  SubRegion 005 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 54 33 416.706 3741.999  CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 54 30 415.015 3725.381  HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 45 35 373.661 3753.563  LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 48 39 386.188 3770.040  LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 53 35 412.180 3753.128  LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 48 35 389.069 3753.370  NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 49 33 390.482 3742.264  PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 50 39 398.512 3771.747  VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 44 38 366.166 3768.454  PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 51 37 403.031 3762.458  SubRegion 006 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 70 6 495.309 3608.603  ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 72 10 506.243 3627.079  ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 69 17 493.780 3664.031  OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 64 19 465.824 3673.327  OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 72 5 506.257 3604.909  SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 68 11 489.079 3630.779  SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 68 8 485.940 3617.850  PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 63 20 463.087 3675.247  SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 66 11 476.604 3633.479  TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 71 4 502.161 3595.415  TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 68 4 489.151 3597.222  TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 71 4 501.409 3598.441  SubRegion 007 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 34 68 318.335 3917.192  BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 34 67 315.231 3913.556  ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 38 64 337.652 3896.481  EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 37 67 331.858 3911.381  OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 34 69 318.448 3922.739  SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 29 71 294.407 3930.657  SubRegion 008 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 50 60 396.640 3878.977  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 65 46 473.963 3808.197  LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 50 52 397.707 3838.298  VICT Victorville-14029 Am 65 48 470.773 3817.551  SubRegion 009 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km) 
 ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- --------- 

 CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 99 8 643.784 3615.183  MEXI Mexicali 1 101 7 650.302 3610.045  MEXT Mexicali 2 101 5 654.966 3604.664  MEXU Mexicali 3 100 7 645.747 3611.053  PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 79 34 543.172 3745.428  TNPM Twentynine Palms-607 88 40 587.597 3777.153  CLXE Calexico CARB 101 8 650.856 3616.181  MEXA Mexicali CARB 100 7 647.525 3614.356  * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 46 3.0 22 3.6 22 0 1.19 -1.3 1.4 -0.59 0.66 -0.1 Subregional Peak: 4.4 21 -1 1.46 (at cell 21 x 47)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 2 2.0 22 2.9 22 0 1.45 0.3 0.3 -13.51 15.21 -99.0 ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 6 3.0 22 1.5 6 -16 0.51 -0.6 0.6 -4.50 5.07 -0.4 ECSP El Capitan State Par 6 3.0 21 0.4 23 2 0.14 -0.9 0.9 -4.50 5.07 0.6 GAVE Gaviota East-N Of Ch 1 2.0 21 0.3 21 0 0.15 -0.8 0.8 -27.01 30.43 -99.0 GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 5 2.0 10 0.1 10 0 0.05 -1.0 1.0 -5.40 6.09 -99.0 GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 3 2.0 16 0.4 23 7 0.18 -0.9 0.9 -9.00 10.14 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 13 2.0 7 3.6 22 15 1.78 -0.4 0.6 -2.08 2.34 -99.0 SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 4 2.0 20 0.6 22 2 0.32 -0.7 0.7 -6.75 7.61 -99.0 SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 5 3.0 21 1.7 7 -14 0.57 -0.5 0.5 -5.40 6.09 0.0 UCSB UCSB West Campus-Arc 1 2.0 23 2.1 23 0 1.05 0.0 0.0 -27.01 30.43 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 43 5.0 0 4.9 22 22 0.98 -0.7 1.0 -0.26 0.37 0.6 Subregional Peak: 5.8 22 22 1.16 (at cell 37 x 40)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 6 3.0 21 3.2 23 2 1.07 -0.2 0.4 -1.88 2.62 0.0 EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 2 2.0 22 1.3 23 1 0.65 -0.4 0.4 -5.63 7.86 -99.0
 OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 7 2.0 0 0.8 22 22 0.41 -0.8 0.8 -1.61 2.25 -99.0

 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 16 5.0 0 4.9 22 22 0.98 -0.3 0.3 -0.70 0.98 0.6 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 12 4.0 7 4.2 22 15 1.04 0.0 0.2 -0.94 1.31 0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 58 10.0 8 8.8 20 12 0.88 -0.6 1.6 0.00 0.36 0.4 Subregional Peak: 12.6 21 13 1.26 (at cell 46 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 23 10.0 8 8.8 20 12 0.88 -0.3 0.3 0.01 0.91 0.4 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 20 7.0 8 6.0 20 12 0.86 0.1 0.4 0.01 1.05 0.3 CALB Calabasas (AV) 15 6.0 8 4.9 4 -4 0.82 0.3 0.4 0.01 1.40 0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 210 11.0 8 8.2 21 13 0.74 -0.9 1.7 -0.12 0.38 0.3 Subregional Peak: 12.4 3 -5 1.12 (at cell 60 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 23 8.0 8 8.2 21 13 1.02 0.0 0.3 -1.12 3.49 -0.1 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 14 6.0 0 6.8 22 22 1.13 0.2 0.6 -1.84 5.73 0.3 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 23 10.0 9 7.3 22 13 0.73 -0.1 0.3 -1.12 3.49 0.2 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 23 7.0 8 4.6 19 11 0.66 -0.2 0.3 -1.12 3.49 -0.1 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 11 4.0 5 4.8 7 2 1.19 0.1 0.2 -2.35 7.29 0.7 PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 3 2.0 19 0.4 21 2 0.18 -0.9 0.9 -8.61 26.73 -99.0 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 23 11.0 8 6.6 20 12 0.60 -0.3 0.3 -1.12 3.49 0.1 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 20 7.0 7 6.8 7 0 0.98 -0.2 0.3 -1.29 4.01 0.8 SANB San Bernardino-24302 23 7.0 21 6.6 22 1 0.94 -0.4 0.5 -1.12 3.49 0.4 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 22 7.0 7 7.6 21 14 1.08 0.0 0.4 -1.17 3.64 0.2 ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 22 7.0 8 7.7 20 12 1.11 0.1 0.4 -1.17 3.64 0.1 CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 3 3.0 19 0.7 20 1 0.24 -0.8 0.8 -8.61 26.73 -0.1
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 209 10.0 8 10.1 20 12 1.01 0.9 1.8 0.36 0.54 0.4 Subregional Peak: 11.7 19 11 1.17 (at cell 49 x 38)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 23 6.0 8 7.6 21 13 1.27 0.3 0.5 3.30 4.92 0.1 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 14 3.0 7 5.5 21 14 1.82 0.4 0.6 5.42 8.08 0.2 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 17 4.0 7 6.4 8 1 1.59 0.4 0.7 4.46 6.65 0.1 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 23 10.0 8 10.1 20 12 1.01 0.6 0.6 3.30 4.92 0.5 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 23 8.0 10 6.7 0 -10 0.83 0.1 0.4 3.30 4.92 0.1 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 23 8.0 8 8.7 10 2 1.08 -0.1 0.3 3.30 4.92 0.3 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 23 9.0 10 8.7 10 0 0.97 0.6 0.6 3.30 4.92 0.7 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 22 10.0 10 9.9 20 10 0.99 0.3 0.4 3.45 5.14 0.2 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 18 4.0 8 6.3 23 15 1.56 0.9 0.9 4.21 6.28 0.4 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 23 10.0 10 7.7 21 11 0.77 0.3 0.4 3.30 4.92 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 176 7.0 7 6.7 23 16 0.96 0.5 1.1 0.26 0.42 0.2 Subregional Peak: 9.2 23 16 1.32 (at cell 70 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 15 3.0 6 4.9 20 14 1.62 0.6 0.6 3.09 4.98 0.0 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 22 6.0 7 4.7 21 14 0.78 0.0 0.2 2.11 3.39 0.7 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 21 4.0 9 4.2 7 -2 1.06 0.1 0.3 2.21 3.55 0.4 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 11 2.0 0 5.4 7 7 2.72 0.6 0.6 4.22 6.79 -99.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 23 7.0 7 4.7 21 14 0.67 0.1 0.4 2.02 3.25 -0.1 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 21 3.0 7 5.0 7 0 1.67 0.4 0.5 2.21 3.55 0.5 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 21 5.0 21 3.9 7 -14 0.77 0.0 0.2 2.21 3.55 0.5 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 9 3.0 0 4.2 6 6 1.39 0.2 0.3 5.15 8.29 -0.1 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 19 7.0 8 6.4 23 15 0.91 0.1 0.4 2.44 3.93 0.5 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 1 2.0 6 2.1 6 0 1.05 0.1 0.1 46.38 74.65 -99.0 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 13 4.0 7 6.7 23 16 1.69 1.0 1.0 3.57 5.74 -0.1
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 62 6.0 21 7.6 2 -19 1.27 -0.4 1.6 -0.02 0.58 0.1 Subregional Peak: 8.7 2 -19 1.44 (at cell 34 x 69)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 18 6.0 21 5.0 20 -1 0.84 0.0 0.3 -0.07 2.00 0.6 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 12 6.0 22 4.4 21 -1 0.73 0.0 0.2 -0.10 2.99 0.4 ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 2 4.0 6 0.3 5 -1 0.07 -0.9 0.9 -0.61 17.96 -99.0 EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 7 4.0 3 2.3 20 17 0.58 -0.6 0.7 -0.17 5.13 -0.4 OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 11 3.0 3 7.6 2 -1 2.54 1.2 1.2 -0.11 3.27 -0.1 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 12 4.0 23 1.1 22 -1 0.28 -0.7 0.7 -0.10 2.99 0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 25 5.0 6 3.9 2 -4 0.78 -1.8 2.0 -0.60 0.70 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 8.0 2 -4 1.61 (at cell 65 x 49)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 6 5.0 6 0.4 0 -6 0.08 -0.9 0.9 -2.51 2.92 0.2 HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 8 5.0 22 3.9 2 -20 0.78 -0.1 0.5 -1.88 2.19 -0.1 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 11 3.0 0 1.2 23 23 0.40 -0.8 0.8 -1.37 1.59 0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
 0009 SubRegion 54 8.0 20 6.7 21 1 0.84 -0.9 1.3 -0.14 0.32 0.4

 Subregional Peak: 7.5 21 1 0.93 (at cell 100 x 07)  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 6 4.0 20 3.5 6 -14 0.89 -0.1 0.2 -1.24 2.90 0.5 MEXI Mexicali 1 8 7.0 20 6.7 21 1 0.96 -0.1 0.3 -0.93 2.17 0.8 MEXT Mexicali 2 7 8.0 20 3.3 22 2 0.41 -0.7 0.7 -1.06 2.49 0.7 MEXU Mexicali 3 10 7.0 20 5.9 21 1 0.84 -0.1 0.2 -0.74 1.74 0.8 PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 10 4.0 1 3.4 0 -1 0.86 -0.1 0.3 -0.74 1.74 0.5 CLXE Calexico CARB 4 7.0 21 3.5 21 0 0.49 -0.3 0.3 -1.86 4.35 0.8 MEXA Mexicali CARB 9 5.0 20 5.7 21 1 1.13 0.3 0.3 -0.83 1.93 0.5 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 75 4.0 6 2.7 7 1 0.68 -1.5 1.5 -0.67 0.67 0.1 Subregional Peak: 3.3 7 1 0.82 (at cell 21 x 47)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 14 3.0 7 1.4 6 -1 0.46 -0.7 0.7 -3.57 3.57 0.1 ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 10 3.0 21 0.5 7 -14 0.16 -0.9 0.9 -5.00 5.00 -0.1 CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 2 2.0 18 0.6 19 1 0.30 -0.7 0.7 -25.01 25.01 -99.0 ECSP El Capitan State Par 10 4.0 6 0.5 1 -5 0.12 -0.9 0.9 -5.00 5.00 -0.3 GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 3 2.0 11 0.2 20 9 0.10 -0.9 0.9 -16.68 16.68 -99.0 GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 1 2.0 6 0.3 6 0 0.16 -0.8 0.8 -50.03 50.03 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 19 4.0 7 2.7 7 0 0.68 -0.4 0.4 -2.63 2.63 0.6 SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 5 3.0 6 0.6 0 -6 0.20 -0.8 0.8 -10.01 10.01 0.2 SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 8 3.0 7 0.8 7 0 0.26 -0.7 0.7 -6.25 6.25 0.5 UCSB UCSB West Campus-Arc 3 2.0 0 1.7 0 0 0.87 -0.6 0.6 -16.68 16.68 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 54 6.0 7 3.3 7 0 0.55 -1.4 1.4 -0.44 0.48 0.3 Subregional Peak: 5.2 0 -7 0.86 (at cell 37 x 40)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 17 4.0 21 3.3 0 -21 0.83 -0.5 0.5 -1.40 1.54 -0.0 EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 7 3.0 22 1.0 23 1 0.34 -0.6 0.6 -3.40 3.73 0.5 OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 1 2.0 7 0.2 7 0 0.10 -0.9 0.9 -23.83 26.10 -99.0
 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 16 6.0 7 3.3 7 0 0.55 -0.4 0.4 -1.49 1.63 0.4

 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 13 6.0 21 3.2 6 -15 0.54 -0.3 0.4 -1.83 2.01 -0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 63 11.0 10 4.9 20 10 0.44 -2.3 2.7 -0.36 0.50 0.2 Subregional Peak: 9.0 0 -10 0.82 (at cell 46 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 23 11.0 10 4.4 0 -10 0.40 -0.6 0.6 -1.00 1.37 -0.1 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 23 9.0 8 4.9 20 12 0.54 -0.4 0.4 -1.00 1.37 0.8 CALB Calabasas (AV) 17 5.0 2 4.7 4 2 0.93 0.0 0.5 -1.35 1.85 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 202 14.0 8 7.5 6 -2 0.53 -2.2 2.6 -0.40 0.51 0.2 Subregional Peak: 13.5 3 -5 0.96 (at cell 64 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 23 9.0 8 5.8 23 15 0.65 -0.6 0.6 -3.51 4.46 -0.1 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 12 6.0 23 6.8 22 -1 1.14 0.0 0.4 -6.73 8.55 0.6 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 23 7.0 20 5.5 22 2 0.79 -0.5 0.5 -3.51 4.46 0.6 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 21 8.0 12 1.3 23 11 0.16 -0.7 0.7 -3.85 4.89 -0.4 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 10 3.0 0 3.3 22 22 1.11 0.1 0.3 -8.08 10.26 -0.1 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 23 14.0 8 5.2 6 -2 0.37 -0.6 0.6 -3.51 4.46 0.0 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 21 7.0 7 7.5 6 -1 1.07 -0.2 0.3 -3.85 4.89 0.8 SANB San Bernardino-24302 23 7.0 21 6.6 6 -15 0.94 -0.4 0.5 -3.51 4.46 0.7 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 23 7.0 20 6.2 6 -14 0.89 -0.3 0.5 -3.51 4.46 0.0 ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 23 7.0 21 6.3 6 -15 0.90 -0.3 0.5 -3.51 4.46 0.2
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 209 17.0 10 10.2 20 10 0.60 -0.1 2.0 0.16 0.44 0.2 Subregional Peak: 15.5 19 9 0.91 (at cell 57 x 29)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 23 9.0 9 10.2 20 11 1.13 0.4 0.5 1.44 3.97 0.1 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 14 3.0 7 9.5 20 13 3.18 1.2 1.2 2.36 6.52 -0.2 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 21 7.0 8 7.0 7 -1 1.00 0.2 0.5 1.57 4.35 -0.0 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 23 17.0 10 7.4 0 -10 0.44 -0.1 0.2 1.44 3.97 0.2 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 23 11.0 9 6.6 21 12 0.60 -0.2 0.3 1.44 3.97 -0.1 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 23 13.0 9 8.3 8 -1 0.64 0.0 0.3 1.44 3.97 0.4 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 17 13.0 9 8.5 9 0 0.65 0.5 0.5 1.95 5.37 0.7 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 23 13.0 11 5.6 6 -5 0.43 -0.2 0.3 1.44 3.97 0.1 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 20 9.0 8 5.4 0 -8 0.60 -0.1 0.3 1.65 4.57 0.5 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 22 11.0 8 9.8 20 12 0.89 0.4 0.5 1.50 4.15 0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 196 9.0 8 7.6 20 12 0.84 0.5 1.5 0.23 0.52 0.2 Subregional Peak: 10.7 0 -8 1.19 (at cell 70 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 16 5.0 9 5.6 9 0 1.13 0.4 0.4 2.85 6.34 0.6 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 18 5.0 7 4.4 7 0 0.87 -0.2 0.2 2.54 5.63 0.3 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 18 7.0 20 6.9 7 -13 0.99 0.0 0.3 2.54 5.63 0.3 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 14 3.0 3 5.1 23 20 1.71 0.2 0.6 3.26 7.24 0.3 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 23 9.0 8 4.6 0 -8 0.51 -0.3 0.4 1.99 4.41 -0.0 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 23 5.0 8 7.6 20 12 1.52 0.4 0.5 1.99 4.41 0.8 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 20 6.0 8 7.0 9 1 1.17 0.1 0.5 2.28 5.07 0.4 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 11 3.0 0 4.3 7 7 1.43 0.2 0.5 4.15 9.22 -0.2 SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 8 2.0 5 7.0 7 2 3.48 1.6 1.6 5.71 12.67 -99.0 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 18 6.0 7 6.9 1 -6 1.15 0.1 0.4 2.54 5.63 0.5 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 10 5.0 8 4.4 22 14 0.89 0.2 0.5 4.57 10.14 0.3 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 17 5.0 9 7.4 1 -8 1.48 0.9 0.9 2.69 5.96 0.2
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 66 6.0 22 5.0 20 -2 0.83 -1.1 1.5 -0.28 0.48 0.3 Subregional Peak: 7.3 0 -22 1.22 (at cell 28 x 60)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 23 5.0 0 5.0 20 20 0.99 -0.3 0.3 -0.79 1.38 0.7 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 14 6.0 22 4.2 20 -2 0.69 -0.3 0.3 -1.30 2.26 0.5 ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 4 3.0 6 0.9 1 -5 0.29 -0.8 0.8 -4.54 7.92 -0.3 EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 3 4.0 19 1.4 19 0 0.35 -0.7 0.7 -6.05 10.56 0.9 OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 9 3.0 5 4.5 3 -2 1.51 0.6 0.6 -2.02 3.52 0.2 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 13 4.0 0 1.4 2 2 0.34 -0.7 0.7 -1.40 2.44 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 18 4.0 0 5.5 3 3 1.36 0.3 1.3 0.15 0.54 0.3 Subregional Peak: 8.4 2 2 2.11 (at cell 65 x 48)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 2 3.0 3 0.2 7 4 0.07 -0.9 0.9 1.32 4.82 -99.0 HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 8 4.0 0 5.5 3 3 1.36 0.7 0.8 0.33 1.20 0.2 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 8 3.0 4 3.1 5 1 1.05 -0.1 0.1 0.33 1.20 0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
 0009 SubRegion 34 7.0 19 7.2 21 2 1.03 -1.1 1.8 -0.27 0.57 0.3

 Subregional Peak: 8.0 21 2 1.14 (at cell 100 x 07)  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 4 5.0 20 2.9 20 0 0.57 -0.6 0.6 -2.28 4.84 0.9 MEXI Mexicali 1 4 6.0 19 5.8 20 1 0.96 -0.1 0.5 -2.28 4.84 0.1 MEXT Mexicali 2 5 7.0 19 2.0 20 1 0.28 -0.7 0.7 -1.82 3.88 0.6 MEXU Mexicali 3 6 7.0 6 5.4 20 14 0.77 -0.1 0.4 -1.52 3.23 -0.0 PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 8 2.0 1 1.8 5 4 0.92 -0.5 0.5 -1.14 2.42 -0.0 CLXE Calexico CARB 1 2.0 19 2.0 19 0 1.01 0.0 0.0 -9.12 19.38 -99.0 MEXA Mexicali CARB 6 6.0 19 7.2 21 2 1.20 0.3 0.8 -1.52 3.23 0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 46 3.0 20 0.7 7 -13 0.23 -1.9 1.9 -0.91 0.91 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 1.0 7 -13 0.32 (at cell 20 x 47)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 5 2.0 0 0.6 7 7 0.28 -0.9 0.9 -8.39 8.39 -99.0 ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 11 3.0 20 0.3 6 -14 0.10 -0.9 0.9 -3.81 3.81 -0.6 CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 1 2.0 8 0.2 8 0 0.09 -0.9 0.9 -41.94 41.94 -99.0 ECSP El Capitan State Par 4 3.0 3 0.2 6 3 0.06 -0.9 0.9 -10.49 10.49 -0.5 GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 10 2.0 10 0.0 20 10 0.02 -1.0 1.0 -4.19 4.19 -99.0 GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 1 2.0 18 0.0 18 0 0.02 -1.0 1.0 -41.94 41.94 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 10 3.0 8 0.7 7 -1 0.23 -0.9 0.9 -4.19 4.19 0.3 SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 1 2.0 7 0.4 7 0 0.22 -0.8 0.8 -41.94 41.94 -99.0 SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 3 2.0 5 0.1 5 0 0.07 -0.9 0.9 -13.98 13.98 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 53 4.0 6 3.3 6 0 0.83 -1.4 1.4 -0.55 0.55 0.4 Subregional Peak: 4.3 0 -6 1.08 (at cell 34 x 41)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 13 3.0 7 1.9 0 -7 0.65 -0.5 0.5 -2.26 2.26 0.0 EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 7 3.0 6 1.3 6 0 0.42 -0.6 0.6 -4.19 4.19 0.4 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 18 4.0 6 3.3 6 0 0.83 -0.5 0.5 -1.63 1.63 0.3 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 15 4.0 6 1.9 7 1 0.48 -0.6 0.6 -1.96 1.96 0.8
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 68 10.0 8 4.6 7 -1 0.46 -2.9 2.9 -0.56 0.59 0.4 Subregional Peak: 6.9 23 15 0.69 (at cell 45 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 23 9.0 9 4.3 5 -4 0.48 -0.6 0.6 -1.65 1.74 -0.1 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 23 10.0 8 4.6 7 -1 0.46 -0.6 0.6 -1.65 1.74 0.7 CALB Calabasas (AV) 22 8.0 8 3.8 7 -1 0.47 -0.4 0.5 -1.73 1.82 0.5 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 200 10.0 7 6.2 0 -7 0.62 -2.4 2.4 -0.56 0.58 0.5 Subregional Peak: 8.5 0 -7 0.85 (at cell 64 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 23 9.0 7 6.2 0 -7 0.69 -0.5 0.5 -4.90 5.06 0.8 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 7 4.0 0 2.9 0 0 0.73 -0.6 0.6 -16.09 16.64 0.3 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 23 7.0 7 4.4 0 -7 0.62 -0.5 0.5 -4.90 5.06 0.8 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 23 9.0 8 4.8 6 -2 0.53 -0.5 0.6 -4.90 5.06 0.7 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 9 4.0 5 2.2 0 -5 0.55 -0.5 0.6 -12.52 12.94 -0.6 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 23 10.0 7 4.8 7 0 0.48 -0.7 0.7 -4.90 5.06 0.8 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 19 10.0 7 4.7 0 -7 0.47 -0.7 0.7 -5.93 6.13 0.4 SANB San Bernardino-24302 23 6.0 0 4.2 0 0 0.69 -0.8 0.8 -4.90 5.06 0.6 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 23 5.0 6 4.6 7 1 0.92 -0.4 0.5 -4.90 5.06 0.1 ULDS Upland-155 "D" St 23 5.0 0 4.5 7 7 0.90 -0.4 0.5 -4.90 5.06 0.2 CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 4 2.0 3 1.4 3 0 0.70 -0.6 0.6 -28.16 29.12 0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations -
 Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 

Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 193 8.0 9 6.6 6 -3 0.82 -0.4 1.4 -0.12 0.43 0.5 Subregional Peak: 12.8 0 -9 1.61 (at cell 55 x 28)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 23 5.0 7 6.2 0 -7 1.25 -0.1 0.5 -1.01 3.57 0.6 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 6 3.0 5 5.9 5 0 1.95 0.2 0.7 -3.87 13.70 0.9 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 20 7.0 8 5.9 6 -2 0.85 0.2 0.4 -1.16 4.11 0.4 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 23 8.0 9 6.6 6 -3 0.82 -0.1 0.3 -1.01 3.57 0.2 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 23 5.0 6 5.9 8 2 1.18 -0.3 0.4 -1.01 3.57 0.9 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 23 7.0 7 6.2 6 -1 0.89 -0.1 0.5 -1.01 3.57 0.2 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 13 4.0 6 6.0 6 0 1.51 -0.2 0.5 -1.79 6.32 0.8 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 20 6.0 7 4.7 0 -7 0.78 -0.3 0.3 -1.16 4.11 0.6 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 20 7.0 9 6.4 6 -3 0.91 -0.1 0.4 -1.16 4.11 0.1 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 22 5.0 8 5.9 6 -2 1.19 -0.3 0.5 -1.06 3.74 0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 152 6.0 7 6.9 6 -1 1.15 -0.2 1.6 -0.04 0.70 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 9.5 1 -6 1.58 (at cell 70 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 7 3.0 8 6.9 6 -2 2.30 0.7 1.2 -0.83 15.21 -0.1 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 12 4.0 8 1.2 7 -1 0.31 -0.7 0.7 -0.48 8.87 0.1 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 21 5.0 6 2.5 7 1 0.49 -0.7 0.7 -0.28 5.07 0.6 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 13 3.0 5 4.5 6 1 1.50 0.3 0.4 -0.44 8.19 0.4 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 20 5.0 0 3.6 6 6 0.71 -0.6 0.7 -0.29 5.32 0.3 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 23 3.0 0 5.5 7 7 1.82 0.4 0.4 -0.25 4.63 0.6 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 3 2.0 4 5.6 6 2 2.80 1.6 1.6 -1.93 35.49 -99.0 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 12 2.0 0 3.7 6 6 1.83 0.1 0.5 -0.48 8.87 -99.0 SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 5 2.0 5 4.5 7 2 2.23 1.0 1.0 -1.16 21.29 -99.0 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 14 6.0 7 6.7 2 -5 1.11 0.1 0.8 -0.41 7.61 0.1 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 8 2.0 0 6.2 0 0 3.09 0.0 1.1 -0.72 13.31 0.1 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 14 4.0 8 6.4 1 -7 1.61 0.0 0.7 -0.41 7.61 0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations -
 Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 

Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 59 8.0 21 5.9 23 2 0.74 -1.9 2.3 -0.42 0.61 0.0 Subregional Peak: 6.8 23 2 0.85 (at cell 34 x 69)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 21 6.0 21 3.7 1 -20 0.61 -0.5 0.5 -1.19 1.72 0.5 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 14 8.0 21 3.2 6 -15 0.40 -0.5 0.5 -1.79 2.58 -0.1 ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 1 2.0 6 0.4 6 0 0.18 -0.8 0.8 -25.04 36.11 -99.0 OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 9 4.0 4 5.9 23 19 1.48 0.6 0.7 -2.78 4.01 0.0 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 14 5.0 22 0.9 0 -22 0.18 -0.9 0.9 -1.79 2.58 -0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 22 6.0 6 3.9 5 -1 0.64 -1.4 1.5 -0.56 0.60 0.6 Subregional Peak: 4.2 5 -1 0.70 (at cell 65 x 49)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 1 2.0 5 0.1 5 0 0.07 -0.9 0.9 -12.33 13.25 -99.0 HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 5 3.0 2 2.6 3 1 0.85 0.0 0.2 -2.47 2.65 0.3 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 13 3.0 4 1.0 5 1 0.35 -0.8 0.8 -0.95 1.02 0.5 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 3 6.0 6 3.9 5 -1 0.64 -0.3 0.3 -4.11 4.42 -0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO2 (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 15 2.0 20 0.9 9 -11 0.43 -1.5 1.5 -0.74 0.74 -99.0 Subregional Peak: 3.1 0 -20 1.53 (at cell 76 x 35)  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 1 2.0 20 0.4 20 0 0.19 -0.8 0.8 -11.11 11.11 -99.0 MEXU Mexicali 3 1 2.0 21 0.5 21 0 0.23 -0.8 0.8 -11.11 11.11 -99.0 PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 4 2.0 5 0.8 7 2 0.39 -0.7 0.7 -2.78 2.78 -99.0 TNPM Twentynine Palms-607 1 2.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.02 -1.0 1.0 -11.11 11.11 -99.0 MEXA Mexicali CARB 8 2.0 9 0.9 9 0 0.43 -0.7 0.7 -1.39 1.39 -99.0
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df SubRegional Descriptions  SubRegion 000 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  SNI San Nicholas Island 23 21 260.383 3682.870  SubRegion 001 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 19 47 241.171 3813.608  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 4 71 167.308 3932.630  CPGB Carpinteria-Gobernad 25 46 274.784 3809.034  ECSP El Capitan State Par 15 48 222.842 3815.987  GAVE Gaviota East-N Of Ch 12 48 206.051 3818.354  GAVW Gaviota West-NW Of C 12 48 206.051 3818.354  GCTY Grover City-9 Le Sag 5 63 170.360 3891.772  GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 12 49 207.757 3823.853  GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 12 48 207.582 3818.305  LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 15 48 221.421 3819.730  LOSP Los Padres NF-Paradi 19 49 244.541 3824.616  LPHS Lompoc-HS&P Facility 8 54 187.080 3846.744  LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 7 52 183.708 3837.602  PTCL Point Conception Lig 7 48 183.013 3817.260  SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 21 47 251.846 3811.467  SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 4 67 168.001 3910.379  SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 8 59 186.376 3870.837  UCSB UCSB West Campus-Arc 18 47 236.471 3810.039  VBPP Vandenberg AFB-Sts P 4 51 168.222 3832.590  SubRegion 002 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 31 43 303.549 3791.740  EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 28 44 286.748 3795.806  OJAI Ojai-1768 Maricopa H 29 47 291.723 3812.339  SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 40 43 345.024 3792.811  THOS Oak View-5500 Casita 26 46 279.337 3807.076  TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 36 42 328.007 3785.712  SubRegion 003 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 47 41 380.176 3781.205  RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 43 41 360.232 3783.329  CALB Calabasas (AV) 41 40 351.388 3779.520  SubRegion 004 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 54 40 415.477 3777.125  BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 73 35 512.325 3752.730 
 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 61 39 453.879 3773.162 

 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 55 40 421.624 3777.071  LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 64 30 469.097 3725.054  PHEL Phelan-Beekley & Phe 60 46 449.457 3808.298  POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 57 38 430.791 3769.607  RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 63 37 461.521 3762.040  SANB San Bernardino-24302 66 39 475.402 3773.081  SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 58 39 438.493 3771.402  CAJB Cajon Pass (AV) 62 45 458.830 3803.663  MBLD Azusa CARB 59 42 442.827 3788.654  SubRegion 005 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 54 33 416.706 3741.999  CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 54 30 415.015 3725.381  HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 45 35 373.661 3753.563  LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 48 39 386.188 3770.040  LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 53 35 412.180 3753.128  LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 48 35 389.069 3753.370  NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 49 33 390.482 3742.264  PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 50 39 398.512 3771.747  VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 44 38 366.166 3768.454  PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 51 37 403.031 3762.458  SubRegion 006 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 70 6 495.309 3608.603  ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 72 10 506.243 3627.079  ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 69 17 493.780 3664.031  OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 64 19 465.824 3673.327  OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 72 5 506.257 3604.909  SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 68 11 489.079 3630.779  SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 68 8 485.940 3617.850  PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 63 20 463.087 3675.247  SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 66 11 476.604 3633.479  TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 71 4 502.161 3595.415  TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 68 4 489.151 3597.222  TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 71 4 501.409 3598.441  SubRegion 007 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 34 68 318.335 3917.192  BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 34 67 315.231 3913.556  ARVN Arvin-20401 Bear Mtn 38 64 337.652 3896.481  EDSN Edison-Johnson Farm 37 67 331.858 3911.381  OLDL Oildale-3311 Manor S 34 69 318.448 3922.739  SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 29 71 294.407 3930.657  SubRegion 008 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 50 60 396.640 3878.977  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 65 46 473.963 3808.197  LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 50 52 397.707 3838.298  VICT Victorville-14029 Am 65 48 470.773 3817.551 
 SubRegion 009 Contains the Following Sites: 

 Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 99 8 643.784 3615.183  MEXT Mexicali 2 101 5 654.966 3604.664  MEXU Mexicali 3 100 7 645.747 3611.053  PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 79 34 543.172 3745.428  TNPM Twentynine Palms-607 88 40 587.597 3777.153  CLXE Calexico CARB 101 8 650.856 3616.181  MEXA Mexicali CARB 100 7 647.525 3614.356  * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 8 6.0 22 0.8 7 -15 0.13 -2.8 2.8 -0.95 0.95 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 5.3 7 -15 0.88 (at cell 07 x 58)  ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 2 3.0 6 0.0 5 -1 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -3.81 3.81 -99.0 ECSP El Capitan State Par 5 6.0 22 0.0 1 -21 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -1.52 1.52 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 1 2.0 7 0.8 7 0 0.39 -0.6 0.6 -7.61 7.61 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 20 10.0 6 7.9 5 -1 0.79 -2.3 2.5 -0.69 0.73 0.7 Subregional Peak: 8.7 5 -1 0.87 (at cell 40 x 43)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 5 4.0 5 0.7 23 18 0.18 -0.9 0.9 -2.75 2.92 -0.9 EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 2 2.0 2 0.0 2 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -6.87 7.29 -99.0 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 9 10.0 6 7.9 5 -1 0.79 -0.5 0.6 -1.53 1.62 0.7 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 4 5.0 6 1.4 5 -1 0.28 -0.6 0.6 -3.43 3.64 -0.3
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 30 11.0 6 20.2 5 -1 1.84 2.5 3.9 0.90 1.18 0.3 Subregional Peak: 34.4 5 -1 3.13 (at cell 43 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 16 11.0 6 10.6 5 -1 0.96 0.0 0.5 1.70 2.21 0.7 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 10 7.0 6 20.2 5 -1 2.89 1.8 1.8 2.71 3.54 0.7 CALB Calabasas (AV) 4 2.0 0 11.0 7 7 5.52 2.3 2.3 6.79 8.86 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 62 23.0 6 26.4 5 -1 1.15 0.9 4.5 0.37 0.91 0.3 Subregional Peak: 66.3 4 -2 2.88 (at cell 59 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 6 10.0 7 7.7 5 -2 0.77 -0.4 0.6 3.83 9.44 0.0 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 3 3.0 0 1.3 23 23 0.43 -0.7 0.7 7.67 18.88 -0.1 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 12 13.0 5 12.7 3 -2 0.98 -0.1 0.6 1.92 4.72 0.1 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 1 2.0 8 0.5 8 0 0.23 -0.8 0.8 23.01 56.63 -99.0 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 2 7.0 5 4.7 6 1 0.67 -0.2 0.2 11.50 28.31 -99.0 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 13 23.0 6 11.2 6 0 0.49 -0.3 0.4 1.77 4.36 0.8 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 10 13.0 5 26.4 5 0 2.03 2.0 2.0 2.30 5.66 0.5 SANB San Bernardino-24302 7 3.0 3 6.4 23 20 2.13 0.4 0.6 3.29 8.09 -0.4 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 8 7.0 5 24.0 5 0 3.43 1.4 1.5 2.88 7.08 0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations -
 Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 

Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 96 16.0 5 53.4 7 2 3.34 8.7 9.5 2.11 2.29 0.4 Subregional Peak: 71.5 5 0 4.47 (at cell 49 x 37)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 9 5.0 5 21.2 6 1 4.24 1.9 1.9 22.46 24.40 0.7 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 2 4.0 7 6.4 7 0 1.59 0.3 0.3 101.09 109.80 -99.0 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 8 7.0 6 28.2 7 1 4.03 3.8 4.2 25.27 27.45 0.6 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 13 12.0 6 40.7 5 -1 3.39 3.1 3.1 15.55 16.89 0.1 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 9 4.0 5 8.2 6 1 2.05 0.7 0.8 22.46 24.40 0.7 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 23 12.0 5 27.1 6 1 2.26 0.5 1.0 8.79 9.55 0.6 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 7 7.0 10 53.4 7 -3 7.63 5.9 5.9 28.88 31.37 0.1 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 10 7.0 6 13.2 5 -1 1.88 1.8 1.9 20.22 21.96 0.3 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 5 5.0 6 21.9 6 0 4.37 3.5 3.5 40.43 43.92 0.6 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 10 16.0 5 24.4 5 0 1.53 1.8 1.8 20.22 21.96 0.8 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 43 5.0 6 14.6 7 1 2.92 3.0 3.7 1.24 1.47 0.2 Subregional Peak: 34.2 23 17 6.85 (at cell 70 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 6 5.0 6 11.7 7 1 2.34 1.3 1.3 8.90 10.56 0.5 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 3 3.0 6 8.8 7 1 2.95 1.8 1.8 17.80 21.12 0.9 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 10 5.0 6 9.1 6 0 1.83 0.7 0.8 5.34 6.34 0.9 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 3 3.0 4 14.1 6 2 4.71 2.3 2.3 17.80 21.12 0.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 4 4.0 6 1.7 10 4 0.42 -0.6 0.6 13.35 15.84 -0.5 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 3 2.0 6 14.6 7 1 7.31 4.1 4.1 17.80 21.12 -99.0 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 5 5.0 7 10.4 7 0 2.08 0.9 0.9 10.68 12.67 0.8 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 4 5.0 5 6.3 6 1 1.27 0.0 1.1 13.35 15.84 -0.1 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 3 3.0 21 10.3 22 1 3.44 1.8 1.8 17.80 21.12 -0.0 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 2 2.0 6 8.9 7 1 4.43 2.9 2.9 26.69 31.68 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
 0007 SubRegion 11 7.0 6 18.0 0 -6 2.57 2.9 3.9 0.93 1.20 0.2

 Subregional Peak: 65.8 2 -4 9.40 (at cell 34 x 69)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 3 5.0 23 11.8 23 0 2.37 0.8 0.8 3.40 4.39 1.0 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 7 7.0 6 18.0 0 -6 2.57 1.2 1.4 1.46 1.88 -0.1 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 1 2.0 23 0.0 23 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 10.19 13.16 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 25 7.0 0 0.0 19 19 0.01 -2.9 2.9 -1.00 1.00 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 27.8 3 3 3.97 (at cell 65 x 49)  MOJP Mojave-923 Poole St 1 2.0 6 0.0 6 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -24.88 24.88 -99.0 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 24 7.0 0 0.0 19 19 0.01 -1.0 1.0 -1.04 1.04 -0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 6 10.0 21 2.0 21 0 0.20 -3.5 3.5 -0.83 0.83 0.7 Subregional Peak: 8.7 3 -18 0.87 (at cell 100 x 07)  MEXT Mexicali 2 3 5.0 21 0.9 22 1 0.17 -0.8 0.8 -1.67 1.67 -0.7 MEXU Mexicali 3 2 10.0 21 2.0 21 0 0.20 -0.8 0.8 -2.50 2.50 -99.0 CLXE Calexico CARB 1 2.0 21 0.3 21 0 0.16 -0.8 0.8 -5.00 5.00 -99.0
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 22 11.0 6 1.3 7 1 0.12 -3.5 3.5 -0.97 0.97 0.3 Subregional Peak: 1.8 7 1 0.16 (at cell 21 x 47)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 2 5.0 7 0.1 7 0 0.03 -1.0 1.0 -10.62 10.62 -99.0 ATAS Atascadero-6005 Lewi 1 2.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -21.24 21.24 -99.0 ECSP El Capitan State Par 5 5.0 6 0.0 7 1 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -4.25 4.25 -0.2 GCTY Grover City-9 Le Sag 2 4.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -10.62 10.62 -99.0 GTCC Gaviota-GTC C 1 Mi E 1 2.0 6 0.0 6 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -21.24 21.24 -99.0 LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 2 2.0 6 0.1 7 1 0.04 -1.0 1.0 -10.62 10.62 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 4 11.0 6 1.3 7 1 0.12 -0.9 0.9 -5.31 5.31 -0.2 SMSB Santa Maria-500 S Br 4 6.0 6 0.2 8 2 0.04 -1.0 1.0 -5.31 5.31 -0.7 UCSB UCSB West Campus-Arc 1 2.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -21.24 21.24 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 22 13.0 6 9.6 5 -1 0.74 -2.2 3.4 -0.48 0.91 0.3 Subregional Peak: 11.0 4 -2 0.85 (at cell 40 x 43)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 5 3.0 7 0.8 7 0 0.26 -0.9 0.9 -2.09 4.02 0.7 EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 5 5.0 5 0.1 8 3 0.02 -1.0 1.0 -2.09 4.02 -0.8 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 8 13.0 6 9.6 5 -1 0.74 0.2 1.0 -1.31 2.51 0.2 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 4 8.0 5 1.7 7 2 0.21 -0.7 0.7 -2.62 5.02 -0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations -
 Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 

Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 28 17.0 6 20.3 5 -1 1.19 0.2 5.7 0.43 1.10 0.0 Subregional Peak: 37.3 5 -1 2.19 (at cell 43 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 13 17.0 6 5.3 5 -1 0.31 -0.7 0.7 0.93 2.36 0.8 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 10 12.0 6 20.3 5 -1 1.69 1.0 1.0 1.21 3.07 0.6 CALB Calabasas (AV) 5 4.0 1 16.5 6 5 4.12 2.3 2.3 2.42 6.14 -0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 71 23.0 6 25.2 3 -3 1.10 -3.4 6.1 -0.31 0.90 0.2 Subregional Peak: 63.4 4 -2 2.76 (at cell 64 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 17 11.0 7 1.3 23 16 0.12 -0.9 0.9 -1.29 3.76 0.0 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 6 4.0 0 2.7 1 1 0.67 -0.4 0.5 -3.66 10.65 0.1 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 9 8.0 0 7.4 23 23 0.93 0.1 0.9 -2.44 7.10 -0.4 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 2 4.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -10.99 31.95 -99.0 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 13 23.0 6 2.1 23 17 0.09 -0.9 0.9 -1.69 4.91 0.5 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 12 20.0 6 25.2 3 -3 1.26 0.3 0.7 -1.83 5.32 0.6 SANB San Bernardino-24302 7 5.0 5 8.9 3 -2 1.77 1.4 1.5 -3.14 9.13 -0.2 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 5 9.0 6 3.5 22 16 0.39 -0.6 0.7 -4.40 12.78 -0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 120 19.0 5 35.1 5 0 1.85 4.1 6.5 1.22 1.62 0.3 Subregional Peak: 47.5 0 -5 2.50 (at cell 49 x 37)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 13 12.0 7 30.9 5 -2 2.57 2.6 2.8 11.28 14.98 0.6 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 2 2.0 6 13.3 6 0 6.65 5.4 5.4 73.33 97.36 -99.0 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 15 12.0 6 23.7 5 -1 1.98 1.4 1.8 9.78 12.98 0.5 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 16 19.0 5 16.6 0 -5 0.88 0.5 0.7 9.17 12.17 0.5 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 11 12.0 6 9.9 5 -1 0.83 0.3 1.0 13.33 17.70 0.3
 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 22 12.0 7 31.4 5 -2 2.62 0.3 0.9 6.67 8.85 0.6

 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 8 12.0 9 35.1 5 -4 2.92 5.7 5.7 18.33 24.34 -0.3 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 9 8.0 6 7.6 0 -6 0.94 0.1 0.9 16.29 21.63 -0.2 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 10 14.0 6 19.1 7 1 1.37 0.3 0.5 14.67 19.47 0.8 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 14 16.0 7 26.6 2 -5 1.66 1.0 1.4 10.48 13.91 0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 60 9.0 8 21.0 1 -7 2.33 2.4 3.8 0.94 1.48 0.2 Subregional Peak: 44.2 0 -8 4.91 (at cell 70 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 7 4.0 6 13.3 6 0 3.33 2.8 2.8 8.01 12.70 0.4 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 5 4.0 6 3.1 5 -1 0.77 -0.4 0.4 11.22 17.78 0.5 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 6 5.0 6 1.8 5 -1 0.37 -0.8 0.8 9.35 14.82 0.7 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 3 3.0 8 13.7 6 -2 4.55 1.9 2.1 18.70 29.64 -0.3 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 6 3.0 6 4.4 1 -5 1.48 0.0 0.8 9.35 14.82 -0.3 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 7 7.0 7 14.2 21 14 2.03 1.7 1.7 8.01 12.70 -0.0 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 6 9.0 8 17.4 7 -1 1.93 1.3 1.4 9.35 14.82 0.4 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 9 3.0 5 6.7 6 1 2.24 -0.1 1.1 6.23 9.88 0.2 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 5 7.0 22 21.0 1 -21 3.00 2.0 2.3 11.22 17.78 -0.4 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 3 2.0 8 2.3 8 0 1.15 -0.3 0.4 18.70 29.64 -0.4 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 3 3.0 22 11.6 6 -16 3.87 2.9 2.9 18.70 29.64 -1.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 23 6.0 5 15.4 0 -5 2.56 3.4 5.3 1.33 1.93 0.0 Subregional Peak: 41.0 0 -5 6.83 (at cell 34 x 69)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 7 4.0 5 15.4 0 -5 3.84 3.0 3.0 4.36 6.34 0.0 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 9 5.0 1 14.0 1 0 2.79 1.9 1.9 3.39 4.93 0.3 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 7 6.0 5 0.1 7 2 0.01 -1.0 1.0 4.36 6.34 -0.3
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 25 6.0 5 0.2 18 13 0.03 -2.8 2.8 -0.98 0.98 0.1 Subregional Peak: 18.1 3 -2 3.02 (at cell 65 x 48)  LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 23 6.0 5 0.2 7 2 0.03 -1.0 1.0 -1.07 1.07 0.2 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 2 3.0 19 0.2 18 -1 0.07 -0.9 0.9 -12.29 12.29 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 3 2.0 6 0.8 20 14 0.42 -1.5 1.5 -0.76 0.76 -99.0 Subregional Peak: 6.1 22 16 3.04 (at cell 100 x 07)  MEXU Mexicali 3 1 2.0 6 0.0 6 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -2.27 2.27 -99.0 MEXA Mexicali CARB 2 2.0 19 0.8 20 1 0.42 -0.6 0.6 -1.13 1.13 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 6 2.0 7 0.1 8 1 0.04 -2.0 2.0 -0.99 0.99 -99.0 Subregional Peak: 0.2 9 2 0.11 (at cell 07 x 58)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 1 2.0 7 0.0 7 0 0.01 -1.0 1.0 -5.93 5.93 -99.0 ECSP El Capitan State Par 2 2.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -2.96 2.96 -99.0
 GTCB Nojoqui Pass-GTC B H 1 2.0 22 0.0 22 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -5.93 5.93 -99.0

 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 2 2.0 7 0.1 8 1 0.04 -1.0 1.0 -2.96 2.96 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 13 8.0 6 0.2 7 1 0.03 -4.1 4.1 -0.98 0.98 -0.1 Subregional Peak: 2.6 0 -6 0.33 (at cell 40 x 45)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 4 5.0 6 0.2 7 1 0.05 -1.0 1.0 -3.18 3.18 -0.6 EMMA Emma Wood State Beac 4 6.0 5 0.0 5 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -3.18 3.18 0.8 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 2 8.0 6 0.1 5 -1 0.02 -1.0 1.0 -6.35 6.35 -99.0 TOMP Thousand Oaks-9 2323 3 6.0 6 0.2 7 1 0.04 -1.0 1.0 -4.24 4.24 -0.5 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 29 11.0 6 5.8 0 -6 0.53 -2.9 3.4 -0.61 0.85 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 17.3 0 -6 1.57 (at cell 43 x 39)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 13 7.0 1 1.6 0 -1 0.22 -0.9 0.9 -1.37 1.89 -0.0 RSDA Reseda-18330 Gault S 11 11.0 6 5.8 0 -6 0.53 -0.3 0.9 -1.62 2.23 -0.2 CALB Calabasas (AV) 5 5.0 6 2.3 5 -1 0.47 -0.6 0.6 -3.56 4.91 0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r) 
 ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----

 0004 SubRegion 57 25.0 6 11.0 1 -5 0.44 -4.5 5.0 -0.60 0.81 0.4 Subregional Peak: 33.2 0 -6 1.33 (at cell 64 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 18 14.0 6 2.4 7 1 0.17 -0.8 0.9 -1.90 2.57 0.6 BANH Banning-135 N Allesa 1 2.0 1 0.0 1 0 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -34.11 46.30 -99.0 FONT Fontana-14360 Arrow 5 12.0 6 5.6 0 -6 0.47 -0.1 0.9 -6.82 9.26 -0.4 GLDR Glendora-840 Laurel 3 4.0 8 2.1 7 -1 0.52 -0.5 0.5 -11.37 15.43 0.8 LELS Lake Elsinore-506 W 2 4.0 6 0.0 7 1 0.00 -1.0 1.0 -17.06 23.15 -99.0 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 12 25.0 6 8.8 7 1 0.35 -0.8 0.8 -2.84 3.86 0.9 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 8 17.0 5 11.0 1 -4 0.65 -0.6 0.6 -4.26 5.79 -0.0 SANB San Bernardino-24302 6 3.0 0 4.5 0 0 1.51 -0.5 0.8 -5.69 7.72 0.1 SNBO San Bernardino-ARB 2 7.0 6 9.3 6 0 1.33 1.5 1.5 -17.06 23.15 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 110 18.0 6 15.0 0 -6 0.83 -0.7 3.6 -0.01 1.03 0.2 Subregional Peak: 26.2 3 -3 1.45 (at cell 52 x 34)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 6 8.0 5 14.0 5 0 1.75 1.7 2.0 -0.21 18.84 0.5 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 3 3.0 6 4.2 5 -1 1.41 0.3 0.4 -0.42 37.68 -0.1 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 14 13.0 5 7.6 3 -2 0.58 0.0 0.8 -0.09 8.07 0.4 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 15 18.0 6 15.0 0 -6 0.83 0.1 1.3 -0.08 7.54 0.0 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 6 5.0 5 14.2 7 2 2.84 1.5 2.1 -0.21 18.84 0.4 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 19 9.0 7 6.4 7 0 0.71 -0.8 0.8 -0.07 5.95 0.9 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 8 6.0 5 6.2 6 1 1.03 -0.3 0.8 -0.16 14.13 0.7 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 7 17.0 6 4.3 0 -6 0.25 -0.4 0.7 -0.18 16.15 -0.7 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 14 8.0 5 13.9 0 -5 1.74 -0.1 0.7 -0.09 8.07 0.6 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 18 18.0 5 11.7 3 -2 0.65 -0.1 1.2 -0.07 6.28 0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 47 9.0 6 8.9 0 -6 0.99 -2.0 2.5 -0.63 0.85 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 28.0 0 -6 3.11 (at cell 70 x 04) 
 CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 5 2.0 5 3.8 5 0 1.88 -0.1 0.6 -5.90 8.00 -99.0

 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 2 2.0 7 0.1 8 1 0.03 -1.0 1.0 -14.76 19.99 -99.0 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 3 9.0 6 0.2 7 1 0.02 -1.0 1.0 -9.84 13.33 -0.9 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 5 4.0 4 1.4 7 3 0.35 -0.8 0.8 -5.90 8.00 -0.3 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 4 4.0 5 0.3 7 2 0.07 -1.0 1.0 -7.38 10.00 -0.5 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 8 6.0 5 2.8 7 2 0.47 -0.6 0.6 -3.69 5.00 0.7 PEND Camp Del MSDCAPCD 8 5.0 4 1.0 7 3 0.19 -0.9 0.9 -3.69 5.00 -0.4 SOLM La Jolla SDCAPCD 1 2.0 6 6.1 6 0 3.06 2.1 2.1 -29.51 39.98 -99.0 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 3 4.0 6 0.5 5 -1 0.12 -0.9 0.9 -9.84 13.33 -0.8 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 6 3.0 8 2.0 1 -7 0.67 -0.8 0.8 -4.92 6.66 -0.1 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 2 3.0 0 8.9 0 0 2.96 0.5 1.5 -14.76 19.99 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 22 10.0 21 13.9 0 -21 1.39 -1.4 4.9 0.11 1.34 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 22.2 0 -21 2.22 (at cell 34 x 69)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 8 6.0 22 13.9 0 -22 2.32 1.0 1.8 0.31 3.69 -0.5 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 9 10.0 21 10.8 1 -20 1.08 -0.1 1.2 0.27 3.28 -0.2 SHFT Shafter-548 Walker S 5 7.0 6 0.0 7 1 0.01 -1.0 1.0 0.49 5.91 -0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: NO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 1.0 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 38 9.0 6 5.0 3 -3 0.56 -2.8 2.8 -0.88 0.88 0.3 Subregional Peak: 6.4 3 -3 0.72 (at cell 65 x 48)  LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 23 9.0 6 0.1 8 2 0.01 -1.0 1.0 -1.46 1.46 -0.2 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 15 5.0 2 5.0 3 1 1.01 -0.7 0.7 -2.23 2.23 0.7
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df SubRegional Descriptions  SubRegion 001 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 19 47 241.171 3813.608  LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 15 48 221.421 3819.730  LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 7 52 183.708 3837.602  SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 21 47 251.846 3811.467  SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 4 67 168.001 3910.379  VBPP Vandenberg AFB-Sts P 4 51 168.222 3832.590  SubRegion 002 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 31 43 303.549 3791.740  SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 40 43 345.024 3792.811  SubRegion 003 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 47 41 380.176 3781.205  SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 42 46 358.986 3806.024  SubRegion 004 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 54 40 415.477 3777.125  POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 57 38 430.791 3769.607  RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 63 37 461.521 3762.040  SANB San Bernardino-24302 66 39 475.402 3773.081  MBLD Azusa CARB 59 42 442.827 3788.654  SubRegion 005 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 54 33 416.706 3741.999  CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 54 30 415.015 3725.381  ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 58 28 436.612 3719.670  HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 45 35 373.661 3753.563  LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 48 39 386.188 3770.040  LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 53 35 412.180 3753.128  LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 48 35 389.069 3753.370  NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 49 33 390.482 3742.264  PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 50 39 398.512 3771.747  VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 44 38 366.166 3768.454  PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 51 37 403.031 3762.458  SubRegion 006 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 70 6 495.309 3608.603 
 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 72 10 506.243 3627.079 

 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 69 17 493.780 3664.031  OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 64 19 465.824 3673.327  OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 72 5 506.257 3604.909  SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 68 11 489.079 3630.779  SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 68 8 485.940 3617.850  TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 71 4 502.161 3595.415  TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 68 4 489.151 3597.222  TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 71 4 501.409 3598.441  SubRegion 007 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 34 68 318.335 3917.192  BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 34 67 315.231 3913.556  SubRegion 008 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 65 46 473.963 3808.197  LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 50 52 397.707 3838.298  VICT Victorville-14029 Am 65 48 470.773 3817.551  SubRegion 009 Contains the Following Sites:  Site Site Description Xcell Ycell XPos(km) YPos(km)  ---- -------------------------------- ------ ------ --------- ---------  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 99 8 643.784 3615.183  EC9S El Centro-150 9th St 98 10 635.792 3628.008  MEXI Mexicali 1 101 7 650.302 3610.045  MEXT Mexicali 2 101 5 654.966 3604.664  MEXU Mexicali 3 100 7 645.747 3611.053  PALM Palm Springs-Fs 590 79 34 543.172 3745.428  CLXE Calexico CARB 101 8 650.856 3616.181  MEXA Mexicali CARB 100 7 647.525 3614.356  * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 22 1.0 7 0.7 22 15 0.68 -0.7 0.7 -0.67 0.67 -99.0 Subregional Peak: 1.5 7 0 1.52 (at cell 07 x 58)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 7 1.0 7 0.7 22 15 0.68 -0.6 0.6 -2.10 2.10 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 3 1.0 11 0.4 17 6 0.36 -0.7 0.7 -4.90 4.90 -99.0 SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 12 1.0 7 0.4 7 0 0.45 -0.7 0.7 -1.23 1.23 -99.0
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 19 2.0 5 1.7 4 -1 0.85 -0.3 0.5 -0.26 0.47 0.4 Subregional Peak: 2.0 7 2 0.99 (at cell 37 x 40)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 4 1.0 5 0.5 22 17 0.52 -0.6 0.6 -1.26 2.21 0.4 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 15 2.0 5 1.7 4 -1 0.85 -0.2 0.4 -0.34 0.59 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 46 3.0 6 2.6 0 -6 0.86 -0.4 0.7 -0.27 0.50 0.3 Subregional Peak: 5.5 5 -1 1.83 (at cell 43 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 23 3.0 6 2.6 0 -6 0.86 0.0 0.4 -0.53 1.00 0.2 SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 23 3.0 6 1.1 23 17 0.38 -0.6 0.6 -0.53 1.00 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 85 4.0 6 3.4 3 -3 0.85 -0.1 0.6 0.00 0.37 0.4 Subregional Peak: 4.3 4 -2 1.08 (at cell 59 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 23 3.0 7 3.4 3 -4 1.14 0.0 0.4 0.00 1.35 0.2 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 23 4.0 6 2.5 5 -1 0.62 0.0 0.3 0.00 1.35 0.5
 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 17 2.0 5 2.6 5 0 1.28 0.2 0.4 -0.01 1.83 0.4

 SANB San Bernardino-24302 22 2.0 0 2.2 23 23 1.11 -0.2 0.3 0.00 1.41 0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 177 3.0 6 6.0 5 -1 2.02 0.8 1.0 0.70 0.86 0.3 Subregional Peak: 8.0 5 -1 2.66 (at cell 47 x 38)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 23 2.0 5 4.2 6 1 2.11 0.8 0.9 5.39 6.59 0.4 ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 19 1.0 5 2.1 5 0 2.15 0.3 0.5 6.53 7.97 -99.0 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 6 2.0 6 4.2 7 1 2.09 0.8 1.2 20.66 25.25 0.5 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 23 3.0 6 6.0 5 -1 2.02 0.9 0.9 5.39 6.59 0.6 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 23 2.0 5 3.3 6 1 1.66 0.6 0.8 5.39 6.59 0.0 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 20 2.0 5 4.4 7 2 2.19 0.2 0.6 6.20 7.57 0.3 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 18 2.0 7 5.9 7 0 2.93 0.7 1.0 6.89 8.42 0.5 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 18 2.0 6 3.5 22 16 1.73 1.3 1.4 6.89 8.42 -0.3 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 4 1.0 6 4.7 6 0 4.75 2.4 2.4 31.00 37.87 -99.0 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 23 3.0 5 3.6 23 18 1.21 0.4 0.6 5.39 6.59 0.5 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 187 4.0 7 4.8 23 16 1.19 0.1 0.5 0.11 0.44 0.3 Subregional Peak: 8.3 23 16 2.07 (at cell 72 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 22 2.0 6 2.2 0 -6 1.10 0.3 0.5 0.93 3.77 0.2 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 18 2.0 7 2.2 7 0 1.09 0.3 0.4 1.13 4.61 0.4 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 24 2.0 5 2.3 6 1 1.14 0.1 0.4 0.85 3.46 0.5 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 10 1.0 4 2.7 7 3 2.66 0.2 0.6 2.04 8.30 -99.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 23 3.0 6 1.7 23 17 0.57 -0.1 0.3 0.88 3.61 0.0 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 19 2.0 6 2.3 7 1 1.17 0.1 0.3 1.07 4.37 0.4 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 22 1.0 0 1.8 7 7 1.81 -0.1 0.3 0.93 3.77 -99.0 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 20 4.0 7 4.6 23 16 1.14 0.0 0.6 1.02 4.15 0.4 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 9 1.0 6 1.3 23 17 1.28 -0.4 0.5 2.26 9.22 0.4 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 20 2.0 6 4.8 23 17 2.38 0.6 0.8 1.02 4.15 0.2
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 23 2.0 21 2.3 7 -14 1.14 0.0 0.5 0.01 0.40 -0.3 Subregional Peak: 2.6 7 -14 1.32 (at cell 33 x 67)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 15 2.0 21 2.3 7 -14 1.14 0.0 0.4 0.02 0.61 -0.3 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 8 1.0 0 1.9 7 7 1.90 0.1 0.4 0.04 1.15 -0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 36 2.0 21 0.9 0 -21 0.47 -0.7 0.7 -0.60 0.60 0.2 Subregional Peak: 1.4 2 -19 0.71 (at cell 65 x 49)  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 23 2.0 21 0.9 0 -21 0.47 -0.5 0.5 -0.95 0.95 0.3 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 13 2.0 0 0.4 0 0 0.19 -0.7 0.7 -1.68 1.68 0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 216 (08/04) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 69 90.0 16 3.4 2 -14 0.04 -2.0 2.3 -0.17 0.45 -0.0 Subregional Peak: 4.8 3 -13 0.05 (at cell 100 x 07)  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 10 3.0 20 3.2 3 -17 1.06 0.4 0.7 -1.14 3.12 -0.2 MEXI Mexicali 1 9 3.0 19 3.2 21 2 1.07 -0.1 0.3 -1.27 3.47 0.7
 MEXT Mexicali 2 13 6.0 21 2.0 22 1 0.34 -0.5 0.5 -0.88 2.40 0.8

 MEXU Mexicali 3 9 90.0 16 3.0 21 5 0.03 -0.1 0.6 -1.27 3.47 -0.5 CLXE Calexico CARB 6 5.0 21 1.6 21 0 0.33 -0.4 0.4 -1.90 5.21 0.8 MEXA Mexicali CARB 22 4.0 20 3.4 2 -18 0.84 -0.2 0.3 -0.52 1.42 0.7 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 54 2.0 6 0.9 7 1 0.44 -0.7 0.7 -0.64 0.64 0.5 Subregional Peak: 2.0 14 8 0.98 (at cell 14 x 62)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 23 1.0 0 0.6 0 0 0.55 -0.6 0.6 -1.51 1.51 -99.0 LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 5 1.0 5 0.4 8 3 0.38 -0.7 0.7 -6.96 6.96 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 14 2.0 6 0.9 7 1 0.44 -0.5 0.5 -2.48 2.48 0.7 SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 12 1.0 0 0.3 16 16 0.27 -0.8 0.8 -2.90 2.90 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 25 3.0 6 1.7 4 -2 0.57 -0.6 0.7 -0.44 0.61 0.2 Subregional Peak: 1.9 4 -2 0.62 (at cell 40 x 43)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 13 1.0 6 0.5 7 1 0.47 -0.6 0.6 -0.85 1.18 0.2 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 12 3.0 6 1.7 4 -2 0.57 -0.2 0.6 -0.92 1.28 0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations -
 Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 

Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 35 4.0 6 1.4 6 0 0.35 -1.3 1.3 -0.62 0.62 0.4 Subregional Peak: 4.2 5 -1 1.06 (at cell 43 x 40)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 23 4.0 6 1.4 6 0 0.35 -0.6 0.6 -0.95 0.95 0.3 SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 12 3.0 5 1.0 0 -5 0.33 -0.6 0.6 -1.82 1.82 0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 79 4.0 6 2.3 5 -1 0.58 -0.9 0.9 -0.45 0.50 0.3 Subregional Peak: 4.3 4 -2 1.07 (at cell 65 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 23 3.0 5 1.1 0 -5 0.38 -0.6 0.6 -1.55 1.73 0.0 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 23 4.0 6 1.1 6 0 0.27 -0.6 0.6 -1.55 1.73 0.4 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 9 3.0 5 2.3 5 0 0.77 -0.2 0.3 -3.95 4.41 0.7 SANB San Bernardino-24302 23 2.0 0 2.2 0 0 1.12 -0.3 0.4 -1.55 1.73 0.7 MBLD Azusa CARB 1 1.0 10 0.2 10 0 0.22 -0.8 0.8 -35.57 39.70 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 200 4.0 5 4.5 2 -3 1.13 0.3 0.9 0.37 0.62 0.2 Subregional Peak: 5.5 6 1 1.38 (at cell 50 x 34)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 21 3.0 7 4.2 5 -2 1.40 1.1 1.1 3.57 5.91 0.1 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 12 1.0 5 2.9 6 1 2.93 1.0 1.0 6.25 10.35 -99.0 ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 8 2.0 5 1.8 0 -5 0.92 0.1 0.3 9.37 15.52 0.2 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 9 3.0 6 3.7 6 0 1.24 0.6 0.6 8.33 13.79 0.6 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 23 4.0 5 3.2 0 -5 0.81 0.0 0.3 3.26 5.40 0.3 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 23 3.0 5 2.7 5 0 0.89 0.0 0.3 3.26 5.40 0.4 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 22 3.0 7 4.5 6 -1 1.50 0.3 0.7 3.41 5.64 0.0 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 19 3.0 9 4.1 6 -3 1.36 0.7 0.8 3.95 6.53 0.3 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 23 3.0 11 3.1 0 -11 1.04 0.2 0.6 3.26 5.40 -0.2
 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 17 3.0 7 3.4 7 0 1.15 0.1 0.4 4.41 7.30 0.6

 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 23 4.0 7 4.5 2 -5 1.13 0.4 0.7 3.26 5.40 0.1 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 183 5.0 7 5.8 0 -7 1.16 0.2 0.7 0.18 0.52 0.4 Subregional Peak: 11.2 1 -6 2.25 (at cell 72 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 20 2.0 6 2.5 6 0 1.25 0.4 0.6 1.67 4.78 0.2 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 18 2.0 5 1.3 0 -5 0.65 -0.1 0.2 1.86 5.31 0.4 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 18 2.0 5 1.5 7 2 0.75 -0.1 0.2 1.86 5.31 0.4 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 11 1.0 5 2.3 7 2 2.35 0.2 0.6 3.04 8.69 -99.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 23 3.0 7 1.9 0 -7 0.63 -0.2 0.4 1.45 4.16 0.0 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 21 2.0 7 2.8 21 14 1.40 0.3 0.6 1.59 4.55 0.1 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 20 2.0 6 3.2 22 16 1.62 0.1 0.5 1.67 4.78 0.6 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 19 5.0 7 5.6 1 -6 1.12 0.2 0.5 1.76 5.03 0.4 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 13 2.0 7 2.2 23 16 1.10 -0.1 0.5 2.57 7.35 0.2 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 20 3.0 22 5.8 0 -22 1.93 1.0 1.0 1.67 4.78 0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 25 2.0 22 1.9 7 -15 0.93 -0.3 0.5 -0.25 0.51 -0.1 Subregional Peak: 2.3 6 -16 1.15 (at cell 33 x 67)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 15 2.0 22 1.9 7 -15 0.93 -0.3 0.5 -0.41 0.85 -0.1 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 10 1.0 0 1.7 6 6 1.74 -0.2 0.5 -0.62 1.27 -0.1
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 55 17.0 7 0.8 0 -7 0.05 -1.9 1.9 -0.72 0.72 0.2 Subregional Peak: 1.1 0 -7 0.06 (at cell 67 x 44)  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 23 1.0 0 0.8 0 0 0.79 -0.6 0.6 -1.72 1.72 -99.0 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 11 2.0 5 0.5 6 1 0.24 -0.7 0.7 -3.59 3.59 0.7 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 21 17.0 7 0.8 1 -6 0.05 -0.9 0.9 -1.88 1.88 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 217 (08/05) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 53 4.0 19 4.0 21 2 1.01 -0.5 0.8 -0.27 0.59 0.3 Subregional Peak: 6.1 22 3 1.53 (at cell 100 x 07)  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 7 3.0 20 2.3 21 1 0.77 -0.2 0.6 -2.01 4.47 0.2 EC9S El Centro-150 9th St 3 2.0 21 0.5 21 0 0.26 -0.7 0.7 -4.69 10.44 0.9 MEXI Mexicali 1 10 4.0 19 3.2 21 2 0.79 0.0 0.6 -1.41 3.13 0.2 MEXT Mexicali 2 18 4.0 19 1.1 20 1 0.28 -0.5 0.5 -0.78 1.74 0.5 CLXE Calexico CARB 4 1.0 6 1.6 20 14 1.64 -0.2 0.5 -3.52 7.83 -99.0 MEXA Mexicali CARB 11 4.0 19 4.0 21 2 1.01 -0.1 0.8 -1.28 2.85 0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 
Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r) 

 ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0001 SubRegion 33 1.0 0 0.5 1 1 0.48 -0.7 0.7 -0.75 0.75 -99.0 Subregional Peak: 1.5 17 17 1.49 (at cell 12 x 64)  GLWF Goleta-380 W Fairvie 11 1.0 0 0.5 1 1 0.48 -0.7 0.7 -2.25 2.25 -99.0 LFC1 Capitan-LFC #1 Las F 1 1.0 11 0.3 11 0 0.27 -0.7 0.7 -24.72 24.72 -99.0 LPSH Lompoc-128 S 'H' St 1 1.0 8 0.3 8 0 0.27 -0.7 0.7 -24.72 24.72 -99.0 SBWC Santa Barbara-3 W. C 4 1.0 7 0.3 7 0 0.30 -0.7 0.7 -6.18 6.18 -99.0 SLOM San Luis Obispo-1160 16 1.0 6 0.2 7 1 0.23 -0.8 0.8 -1.55 1.55 -99.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0002 SubRegion 35 2.0 5 0.9 23 18 0.46 -0.6 0.6 -0.57 0.57 0.0 Subregional Peak: 2.5 14 9 1.23 (at cell 37 x 48)  ELRO El Rio-Rio Mesa Scho 13 1.0 4 0.4 7 3 0.42 -0.6 0.6 -1.55 1.55 0.0 SVAL Simi Valley-5400 Coc 22 2.0 5 0.9 23 18 0.46 -0.5 0.5 -0.91 0.91 -0.0 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0003 SubRegion 41 2.0 0 1.1 22 22 0.54 -0.7 0.8 -0.47 0.48 -0.2 Subregional Peak: 2.3 0 0 1.13 (at cell 43 x 39)  BRBK Burbank-228 W Palm A 23 2.0 0 1.1 22 22 0.54 -0.5 0.5 -0.84 0.86 -0.6 SCLR Santa ClarSCAQMD 18 2.0 5 0.9 23 18 0.45 -0.5 0.5 -1.08 1.10 -0.4
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0004 SubRegion 75 4.0 6 1.5 0 -6 0.36 -0.8 0.8 -0.48 0.48 0.5 Subregional Peak: 2.9 7 1 0.72 (at cell 54 x 38)  AZSA Azusa-803 N Loren Av 20 4.0 6 1.3 7 1 0.32 -0.4 0.4 -1.79 1.79 0.7 POMA Pomona-924 N. Garey 23 4.0 6 1.4 7 1 0.34 -0.5 0.5 -1.55 1.56 0.5 RUBI Rubidoux-5888 Missio 9 3.0 6 0.5 23 17 0.18 -0.7 0.7 -3.97 3.99 0.1 SANB San Bernardino-24302 23 2.0 0 1.5 0 0 0.73 -0.5 0.5 -1.55 1.56 0.6 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0005 SubRegion 189 3.0 5 3.9 6 1 1.30 0.0 0.5 0.02 0.46 0.4 Subregional Peak: 5.1 0 -5 1.69 (at cell 54 x 30)  ANAH Anahiem-1610 S Harbo 23 2.0 5 3.9 6 1 1.95 0.3 0.8 0.16 3.77 0.5 CMMV Costa Mesa-2850 Mesa 5 1.0 5 3.2 5 0 3.25 1.1 1.2 0.73 17.36 -99.0 ELTR El Toro-23022 El Tor 4 1.0 9 1.4 10 1 1.38 -0.1 0.5 0.91 21.69 -99.0 HAWH Hawthorne-5234 W. 12 17 3.0 5 2.1 7 2 0.69 0.1 0.3 0.22 5.10 0.5 LANM Los Angeles-1630 N M 21 3.0 6 2.2 0 -6 0.72 0.0 0.3 0.17 4.13 0.1 LHAB La Habra-621 W. Lamb 23 2.0 3 3.2 7 4 1.61 0.1 0.6 0.16 3.77 0.7 LYNW Lynwood-11220 Long B 19 2.0 5 2.3 7 2 1.14 -0.2 0.3 0.19 4.57 0.9 NLGB Long Beach-3648 N Lo 15 2.0 5 2.3 7 2 1.15 -0.2 0.5 0.24 5.79 0.7 PDSW Pasadena-752 S. Wils 23 3.0 6 1.7 0 -6 0.57 -0.2 0.3 0.16 3.77 0.1 VALA W Los Angeles-VA Hos 16 2.0 0 2.1 0 0 1.07 0.0 0.2 0.23 5.42 0.7 PICO Pico Rivera-3713 San 23 2.0 5 2.8 0 -5 1.41 0.0 0.5 0.16 3.77 0.3
 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * * 

 Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0006 SubRegion 153 3.0 5 4.5 2 -3 1.50 -0.2 0.7 -0.20 0.61 0.1 Subregional Peak: 6.9 3 -2 2.31 (at cell 70 x 04)  CHVT Chula Vista-80 E "J" 9 1.0 4 2.7 6 2 2.67 0.3 0.9 -3.32 10.41 -99.0 ECAJ El Cajon-1155 Redwoo 12 1.0 0 0.7 10 10 0.66 -0.5 0.5 -2.49 7.80 -99.0 ESCO Escondido-600 E. Val 23 3.0 5 0.8 23 18 0.28 -0.4 0.4 -1.30 4.07 0.4 OCEA Oceanside-1701 Missi 10 1.0 0 1.5 0 0 1.52 0.0 0.4 -2.98 9.36 -99.0 OTAY Otay-1100 Paseo Inte 16 2.0 0 1.7 6 6 0.85 -0.4 0.5 -1.87 5.85 0.5 SDOV San Diego-5555 Overl 22 2.0 6 1.8 0 -6 0.91 -0.1 0.4 -1.36 4.26 0.2 SD12 San Diego-330A 12th 7 1.0 4 2.1 5 1 2.13 0.3 0.8 -4.26 13.38 -99.0 TILM Tijuana 1 CARB 18 3.0 6 4.5 2 -4 1.50 0.0 0.9 -1.66 5.20 0.1 TIPL Tijuana 2 CARB 15 1.0 0 2.3 0 0 2.34 -0.5 0.8 -1.99 6.24 0.1 TITT Tijuana 3 CARB 21 2.0 0 3.9 1 1 1.97 -0.1 0.7 -1.42 4.46 0.3 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0007 SubRegion 32 2.0 5 1.3 7 2 0.66 -0.8 0.8 -0.54 0.56 -0.3 Subregional Peak: 1.5 7 2 0.76 (at cell 33 x 67)  BKGS Bakersfield-1138 Gol 21 2.0 5 1.3 7 2 0.66 -0.5 0.5 -0.82 0.85 -0.3 BLFC Bakersfield-5558 Cal 11 2.0 6 1.1 7 1 0.55 -0.6 0.6 -1.56 1.63 -0.2 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations -
 Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized 

Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0008 SubRegion 60 8.0 7 0.8 20 13 0.10 -2.1 2.1 -0.73 0.73 0.2 Subregional Peak: 1.2 19 12 0.15 (at cell 45 x 53)  HESP Hesperia-17288 Olive 22 1.0 0 0.7 20 20 0.74 -0.6 0.6 -2.00 2.00 -99.0 LANC Lancaster-315 W. Pon 17 3.0 6 0.6 20 14 0.21 -0.7 0.7 -2.58 2.58 0.1 VICT Victorville-14029 Am 21 8.0 7 0.8 20 13 0.10 -0.9 0.9 -2.09 2.09 0.4 * * * Model Performance Evaluation * * *  Pollutant: CO (pphm) Project: UAM6.21 Base Case (97df) Simulation ID: 97df  Statistics were calculated for the 24-hour period of DOY 218 (08/06) 1997  Included were data-pairs with observed concentrations above a threshold of 0.2 (pphm)  ------- Peak Concentrations -------- --- Comparisons with Observations - Observed Predicted Time Peak Mean Mean Normalized Site Description No Value Time Value Time Lag Ratio Bias Error Bias Error (r)  ---- ------------------------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- 0009 SubRegion 62 1.0 5 0.8 23 18 0.78 -0.6 0.6 -0.65 0.65 -99.0 Subregional Peak: 1.1 0 -5 1.08 (at cell 93 x 13)  CALE Calexico-Calexico HS 19 1.0 5 0.6 23 18 0.56 -0.6 0.6 -2.12 2.12 -99.0 MEXI Mexicali 1 8 1.0 6 0.4 7 1 0.39 -0.7 0.7 -5.02 5.02 -99.0 MEXT Mexicali 2 16 1.0 1 0.2 8 7 0.25 -0.8 0.8 -2.51 2.51 -99.0 MEXA Mexicali CARB 19 1.0 5 0.8 23 18 0.78 -0.6 0.6 -2.12 2.12 -99.0
Graphical Analyses 
Figure A-1 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of O3 for August 4, 1997
Figure A-2 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of O3 for August 5, 1997
Figure A-3 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of O3 for August 6, 1997
Figure A-4 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of NO2 for August 4, 1997 
 

Figure A-5 

Distribution of Predicted and Residual (P-O) Concentrations as a Function of Observed 

Concentrations of NO2 for August 5, 1997
Figure A-6 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of NO2 for August 6, 1997
Figure A-7 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of NO for August 4, 1997
Figure A-8 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of NO for August 5, 1997
Figure A-9 

Distribution of predicted and residual (P-O) concentrations as a function of observed 

concentrations of NO for August 6, 1997
Figure A-10 

O3 prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 4, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-11 

O3 prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 5, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-12 

O3 prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 6, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-13 

NO2 prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 4, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-14 

NO2 prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 5, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-15 

NO2 prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 6, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-16 

NO prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 4, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-17 

NO prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 5, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-18 

NO prediction bias, error and residual stratified by concentration for August 6, 1997. 

The shaded area represents the overall performance goals. 
Figure A-19a 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19b 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19c 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19d 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19e 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19f 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19g 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19h 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19i 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19j 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19k 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19l 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19m 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19n 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
 

Figure A-19o 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19p 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-19q 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO2 concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20a 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20b 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20c 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20d 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20e 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20f 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
 

 

Figure A-20g 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20h 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20i 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20j 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20k 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20l 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20m 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20n 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20o 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20p 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-20q 

Comparison between simulated and measured NO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 

Figure A-21a 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21b 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21c 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21d 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21e 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21f 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21g 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21h 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21i 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21j 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21k 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21l 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21m 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21n 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21o 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21p 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-21q 

Comparison between simulated and measured CO concentrations (pphm) at air quality 

monitoring stations in the SCOS97 study domain for August 3-7, 1997. 
Figure A-22a 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 100 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22b 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 200 PST, August 4, 1997.

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0
Figure A-22c 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 300 PST, August 4, 1997. 

Figure A-22d 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 400 PST, August 4, 1997.

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0
Figure A-22e 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 500 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22f 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 600 PST, August 4, 1997.

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

8.0
Figure A-22g 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 700 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22h 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 800 PST, August 4, 1997.

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

4.0 4.0 4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

8.0 8.0

8.0
Figure A-22i 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 900 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22j 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1000 PST, August 4, 1997.

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 6.0

6.0

6.0 6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0 6.0

6.0 6.0

6.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0
Figure A-22k 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1100 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22l 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1200 PST, August 4, 1997.

4

4 4 4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

4 6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10
Figure A-22m 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1300 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22n 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1400 PST, August 4, 1997.

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8 8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8 10

10

10

10

12

12

4

4 6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6 6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12
Figure A-22o 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1500 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22p 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1600 PST, August 4, 1997.

4

4 6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6 6 6

8

8

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8 8

10

10

10 10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12

12

14

14

4 4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8 8

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14

16
Figure A-22q 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1700 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22r 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1800 PST, August 4, 1997.

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8 8

10

10

10 10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14

16

16

4

4

4

4 4

4

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10 8

10

10

10

10

10

10

12 12

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14

16

16
Figure A-22s 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1900 PST, August 4, 1997.

 

Figure A-22t 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2000 PST, August 4, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

12 10

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

16

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8 8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10 10

10 12

12

12
Figure A-22u 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2100 PST, August 4, 1997.

Figure A-22v 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2200 PST, August 4, 1997.

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

10

10

10

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8 8
Figure A-22w 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2300 PST, August 4, 1997. 

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8
Figure A-23a 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 100 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23b 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 200 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6 6

6

6

6

6
Figure A-23c 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 300 PST, August 5, 1997. 

Figure A-23d 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 400 PST, August 5, 1997.

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0 4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0 6.0

6.0

6.0

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6
Figure A-23e 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 500 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23f 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 600 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

10
Figure A-23g 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 700 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23h 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 800 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

10

10

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

10

10
Figure A-23i 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 900 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23j 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1000 PST, August 5, 1997.

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8 10

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

10
Figure A-23k 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1100 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23l 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1200 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

4 4

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6 6 6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

4 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10
Figure A-23m 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1300 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23n 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1400 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6 6 6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12
Figure A-23o 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1500 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23p 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1600 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10 10

12 10

12

12

12

14

14

14

14

4

6

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14 16

16

16
Figure A-23q 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1700 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23r 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1800 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8 10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

16 14

16

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12 12

14

14

14

16

16
Figure A-23s 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1900 PST, August 5, 1997.

 

Figure A-23t 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2000 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

4

4 4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

12

12 12

12

14

14

14 16

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8 8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12
Figure A-23u 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2100 PST, August 5, 1997.

Figure A-23v 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2200 PST, August 5, 1997.

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

10 10

10 12

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8 8

8

8

10

12
Figure A-23w 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2300 PST, August 5, 1997. 

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6 6

6

8

10
Figure A-24a 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 100 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24b 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 200 PST, August 6, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

8

10

4

4

4

4

4

4 4 4

4

4

4

4

6

8

10
Figure A-24c 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 300 PST, August 6, 1997. 

Figure A-24d 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 400 PST, August 6, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

8

10

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

8

10
Figure A-24e 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 500 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24f 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 600 PST, August 6, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

8

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

6

8
Figure A-24g 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 700 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24h 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 800 PST, August 6 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

8

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4 4 4

6

6

6

6

6

8
Figure A-24i 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 900 PST, August 6 1997.

Figure A-22j 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1000 PST, August 4, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

8 8

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8
Figure A-24k 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1100 PST, August 6 1997.

Figure A-24l 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1200 PST, August 6 1997.

4

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6 6 6

6

6

6

6 6

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8 8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10 10

10

10

12
Figure A-24m 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1300 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24n 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1400 PST, August 6, 1997.

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

6

6

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8 10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12 12

12

12

12

14

14

14
Figure A-24o 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1500 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24p 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1600 PST, August 6, 1997.

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10 10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12 12

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14

14

16

16

4

4

6

6 6

6 6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8 8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12 12

12

12

12 12

12

14

14

14

14

14

14 16

16
Figure A-24q 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1700 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24r 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1800 PST, August 6, 1997.

4

4

4

6

6

6 6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12 12

12

12

12

12

12

12

14 14 14

14

14

14

14

16

16

18

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10 10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12 12 12

12

12 12

12

12

14 14

14

14

14

14

14

16

16 16

16

18
Figure A-24s 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 1900 PST, August 6, 1997.

 

Figure A-24t 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2000 PST, August 6, 1997.

4

4

4

4 6

6 6 6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8 8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10 10

10

10

10

10

10

10

12 12 12

12

12

12 12

12

14 14 14

14

14

14

14

16 16

16

4

4

4

4

4 4

6

6 6 6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8 8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10 10 10

10

10

10

10

12 12 12

12

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14 14

14

16

16

16
Figure A-24u 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2100 PST, August 6, 1997.

Figure A-24v 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2200 PST, August 6, 1997.

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10 10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

12

14

14

14

14

14

14

16

4 4 4

4

4 4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10 10 10

10

10

10

12

12

12

12 12

12

12

12

14

14

14 14
Figure A-24w 

Layer-1 predicted ozone (pphm) 2300 PST, August 6, 1997. 

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10 12

12

12

12

12 12

12
Sensitivity Analyses 
Figure A-25 

Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with zero-boundary conditions Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b)

a. 

b. 
Figure A-26 

Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with zero-initial conditions Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b)

b. 

a. 
Figure A-27 

Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with only biogenic emissions Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b)

b. 

a. 
Figure A-28 

Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with no biogenic emissions Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b)

a. 

b. 
Figure A-29 

Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with double biogenic emissions Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b) 

b. 

a. 
Figure A-30 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with zero stationary source emissions: 

 Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

b. 

a. 
Figure A-31 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with zero mobile source emissions: 

Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-32 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Opttion-1 emissions: 

Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-33 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-2 emissions: 

Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-34 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-1 emissions with biogenic emissions reduced by 1/3: 

Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-35 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-2 emissions with biogenic emissions reduced by 1/3: 

Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-36 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-1 emissions with biogenic emissions reduced by 1/3 

in the Cleveland Forrest: Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-37 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-2 emissions with biogenic emissions reduced by 1/3 

in the Cleveland Forrest: Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

a. 

b. 
Figure A-38 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-1 emissions with doubled biogenic emissions: 

 Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

b. 

a. 
Figure A-39 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-2 emissions with doubled biogenic emissions: 

 Aug. .5, 1997 (a) and Aug. 6, 1997 (b), episodes 

b. 

a. 
Figure A-40 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-1 emissions with weekend emissions: 

 Aug. .5, 1997 (a) assumed as Saturday and Aug. 6, 1997 (b) assumed as Sunday 

b. 

a. 
Figure A-41 

2010 Maximum predicted ozone (pphm) with Option-2 emissions with weekend emissions: 

 Aug. .5, 1997 (a) assumed as Saturday and Aug. 6, 1997 (b) assumed as Sunday 

a. 

b. 
 Figure A-42a 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode
Figure A-42b 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42c 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42d 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42e 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42f 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42g 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42h 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42i 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42j 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42k 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42l 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42m 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42n 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42o 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42p 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
 

Figure A-42q 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42r 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42s 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42t 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42u 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42v 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42w 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-42x 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero boundary conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43a 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 

Figure A-43b 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43c 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43d 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43e 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43f 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43g 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43h 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43i 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43j 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43k 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43l 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43m 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43n 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43o 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43p 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43q 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43r 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43s 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43t 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43u 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43v 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43w 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-43x 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero initial conditions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44a 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44b 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44c 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44d 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
 Figure A-44e 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44f 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44g 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44h 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44i 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44j 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44k 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44l 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44m 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44n 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44o 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44p 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44q 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44r 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44s 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45t 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44u 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44v 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44w 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44x 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and zero biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45a 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45b 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45c 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45d 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45e 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45f 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45g 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45h 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45i 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45j 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45k 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45l 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45m 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45n 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45o 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45p 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45q 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45r 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45s 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-44t 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45u 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45v 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45w 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode 
Figure A-45x 

Comparison between model simulation arb97b and doubled biogenic emissions for the August 1997 

meteorological episode