alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   87,384,615
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 41,347,223
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      18,221,702
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,655,194
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             150,608,734
<COMMON>                                    32,347,401
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   13,017,085
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         29,495,174
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              74,859,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 11,718,785
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        41,250,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                3,000,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              19,780,289
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              150,608,734
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   62,832,520
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         8,584,726
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  50,263,378
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     12,569,142
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           9,352,260
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              21,921,230
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,984,300
<NET-INCOME>                                10,352,376
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    663,345
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                9,689,031
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     5,674,572
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      14,253,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018182EN.01001201.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Gent (Belgium) lodged on 7 March 2018 — Ronny Rohart v Federale Pensioendienst

(Case C-179/18)

(2018/C 182/13)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidsrechtbank Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ronny Rohart

Applicant:

Defendant: Federale Pensioendienst

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the principle of sincere cooperation as laid down in Article 4(3) TEU, in conjunction with the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, as laid down in Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1) of the Council of 29 February 1968, be interpreted as precluding the legislation of a Member State not permitting the military service which a worker has carried out in a Member State to be taken into account in the calculation of that worker’s retirement pension on the basis of his performance in that Member State, because at the time of his military service and subsequently as well, the person concerned was uninterruptedly an official of the European Union, and consequently, does not satisfy the conditions for equivalence as laid down in the legislation of that Member State?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (OJ 1968, L 56, p. 1).

1

---
Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 23-Apr-2014

SOI Tax Stats - Corporation Tax Statistics

Return to the Tax Stats home page

Corporate Returns OneSheet, 2011 (PDF)

The OneSheet presents a project description, highlights of the data, and selected figures.

Links to numerous articles and data providing statistics on income, deductions, credits and other 

taxes, as reported by corporations filing on Form 1120 (including 1120-A, 1120-L, 1120-PC, 1120-

REIT, 1120-RIC, and more) and their associated schedules, can be found here.

For an explanation of terms, a description of the sample and limitations of the data, links to recent 

revisions of select corporate tax forms and other information about the data, please visit the 

Corporation Metadata page.

Featured Areas Statistical Tables

Browse for articles and tables in a particular 

area of interest by choosing from the links 

below:

Browse for tables spanning all areas of interest 

by choosing from the following links below:

• Integrated Business Data

• Corporation Complete Report

• Corporation Source Book

• Corporation Research Credit

• Corporate Schedule M-3

• Corporation Depreciation Data

• Study Methodology and Limitations (pdf)

• by Sector or Industry

• by Type of Return

• by Size

Publications Other IRS Data and Related Links

Browse for articles and tables from the following 

publications:

For data on tax administration and other taxes, 

choose from the links below:

• Early Data Releases

• SOI Bulletin Articles

• Publications and Papers

• Estimated Corporation Data Line Counts

• Collecting Revenue

• Enforcing Laws

• Issuing Refunds

Return to the Tax Stats home page

http://www.irs.gov/uac/SOI-Tax-Stats-Corporation-Tax-Statistics
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 500 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the State of 

Israel has the right to defend itself against Iranian hostility and that 

the House of Representatives pledges to support Israel in its efforts 

to maintain its sovereignty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2015 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. RIGELL, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. 

MCCLINTOCK, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. 

MULVANEY, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. RUSSELL, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. 

SMITH of Texas, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. BISHOP

of Michigan, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. PALMER, Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, 

Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. 

WALBERG, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. WALKER, Mr. LAMALFA, 

Mr. ROUZER, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. YOUNG of Iowa, and Mr. BURGESS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the State of Israel has the right to defend itself against 

Iranian hostility and that the House of Representatives 

pledges to support Israel in its efforts to maintain its 

sovereignty. 

Whereas the State of Israel has been a loyal friend and ally 

of the United States since its establishment in 1948; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 500 IH 

Whereas, on September 9, 2015, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 

stated that Israel ‘‘. . . will not see [the] next 25 years 

. . . Until then, struggling, heroic and jihadi morale will 

leave no moment of serenity for Zionists’’; and 

Whereas the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), 

a project of the Obama Administration, was finalized on 

July 14, 2015, by the E3/EU+3 (China, France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and 

the United States, with the High Representative of the 

European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy) 

and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and substantially diminishes the security of Israel: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) it is the sense of the House of Representa3 tives that the State of Israel has the right to defend 

4 itself against Iranian hostility; and 

5 (2) the House of Representatives pledges to 

6 support the State of Israel in its efforts to maintain 

7 its sovereignty. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors 
MicroTel International, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements (Nos. 333-74281, 333-71035, 333-69571, 33-22518, 33-72926 and 
333-12567) on Form S-8 of our report dated February 19, 1999, except as to 
the penultimate paragraph of Note 14 and the second paragraph of Note 16 
which are as of March 1, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial 
statements and financial statement schedule of MicroTel International, Inc. 
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1998.


                                       BDO Seidman, LLP


Orange County, California
March 30, 1999
February 24, 1999

20323

#### Friends of Red Road v. County of Hawai'i

Affirmed
# C_2020027EN.01003101.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Representation of a chequered gingham pattern)

(Case T-658/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2020/C 27/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hästens Sängar AB (Köping, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson and R. Wessman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, H. O’Neill and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2018 (Case R 442/2018-2) concerning the international registration designating the European Union of a figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hästens Sängar AB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hästens Sängar AB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
#### Kaina v. Kapalua Land Co., Ltd.

16149

4/16/97

Affirmed
Exhibit 107



		

			 

		




		
			Exhibit 10.7
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
		

		
			THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of July 18, 2016 by and between Mitchell S. Steiner, M.D. (the "Executive"), and THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation (the "Company").
		

		
			RECITALS
		

		
			The Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of April 5, 2016 (the "Existing Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Existing Agreement.
		

		
			In accordance with Section 16 of the Existing Agreement, the undersigned desire to amend the Existing Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
		

		
			AGREEMENTS
		

		
			In consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			Sections 1 and 8 of the Existing Agreement are amended by replacing the term "Mergers" with "APP Merger" in each and every place where such term appears.




			
	
			
				 2.
			No Other Changes.  Except as expressly provided herein, the Existing Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




			
	
			
				 3.
			Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered originals of one and the same agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties hereto and delivered to the other parties.  Signatures delivered by facsimile or by e-mail in portable document format (PDF) shall be binding for all purposes hereof.




		
			[Signature page follows.]
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			 
		


		

		

		 

 


		

			 

		




		IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						By    /s/  O.B. Parrish

					
						Name: O.B. Parrish

					
						Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

				



		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						EXECUTIVE

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						Signature: /s/  Mitchell S. Steiner

					
						 

					
						Print Name: Mitchell S. Steiner, M.D.

				



		
			﻿
		

		 


		

			[Signature Page to First Amendment to Employment Agreement]
July 29, 2013

Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of US Airways, Inc. for Renewal of an Exemption

(United States – Belize) (Docket DOT-OST-2002-12259) and 

Application of US Airways, Inc. for Renewal of an Exemption

(Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands) 

(Docket DOT-OST-1997-2721)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”) has polled the air carriers on the attached 

service list regarding the above-referenced Applications. We received no 

objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited consideration of these

Applications.

Sincerely,

Howard Kass

Vice President, Legal and Government Affairs

Benjamin T. Slocum

Director, Legal and Government Affairs

Attachment

cc: Service List
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on July 29, 2013, I caused to be served a copy of the 

foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

urskr@state.gov (Department of State)

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

vanessa.balgobin@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

karine.faden@united.com (United)

francis.heil@aa.com (American)

robert.wirick@aa.com (American)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue)

msinick@ssd.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

ethan.blank@rjet.com (Republic)

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

cefelts@fedex.com (FedEx)

nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar)

______________________

Benjamin T. Slocum
May 13, 2002

23278, 23333

#### State v. Marbou

Affirmed
From: "Sepulveda, Domingo PW" <domingo.sepulveda@pw.utc.com>

To: Glenn Passavant/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Wilcox/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/18/2012 10:15 AM

Subject:

Hi Glenn, Rich,

Reflecting on our recent discussions, we have developed a proposal that could reconcile the issues that 

EPA and FAA have raised in implementing the rule while addressing the concerns that Pratt has raised 

and the government has recognized regarding the transition period. We look forward to discussing this 

idea in today’s teleconference. An outline of our proposal is below; these are engineers’ words meant to 

convey intent, not lawyerly language or suggested precise regulatory wording.

Assuming the regulation goes into effect on Jan 1, 2013, to ensure an orderly transition 

and leadtime without disruption of commerce or loss of jobs, during the first 12 months 

only (calendar year 2013), a very limited number (not to exceed 10 per manufacturer) of 

engines compliant with current standards but which have not been formally 

acknowledged by the FAA as being CAEP 6 compliant, may be shipped for installation on 

new aircraft without requiring additional FAA/EPA authorization. These engines will not 

be specially marked.

Talk to you at 2:00PM,

Dom

Dom Sepulveda

Manager, Environmental Regulatory Affairs - Emissions

Pratt & Whitney

400 Main Street (M/S 163-17)

East Hartford, CT 06108

email domingo.sepulveda@pw.utc.com

Telephone - 860 565-0375

efax - 860 755-6690
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THIRTEEN AND
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998<F1>
<CASH>                                         402,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,259)
<INVENTORY>                                    815,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,509,657
<PP&E>                                         443,018
<DEPRECIATION>                               (210,158)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,863,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,176,495
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           939
<OTHER-SE>                                     415,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,863,519
<SALES>                                      3,129,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,129,215
<CGS>                                        2,702,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,702,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               389,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,101
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<FN>
<F1>Restated financial data schedule. Effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2000,
the Company adopted a new accounting policy for the recognition of revenues
related to sales of certain extended service plans by the Company, as
described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended
December 25, 1999. The Company has given retroactive effect to this new
accounting policy and is accordingly restating its financial statements for the
twenty-six weeks ended December 26, 1998.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### State v. Coffman

22742

08/08/2001

Affirmed
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Ruh

17906

4/3/97

Affirmed
##### 



ZIX CORPORATION
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
    1. Definitions .
 Acquiring Person
 Affiliate and Associate
 Change in Control
  rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 1




---



##### 



Continuing Director
 rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 2




---



##### 



Disability
 Exchange Act
 Resignation
 Retirement
 Term of Option .
 Exercise of Option .
 Exercise
 Adjustment
 Method of Exercise
 rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 3




---



##### 



Termination of Option .
  rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 4




---



##### 



No Rights as Shareholder.
 State and Federal Securities Regulation.
 rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 5




---



##### 



Modification of Options .
 Withholding of Taxes .
 Continued Employment Not Presumed .
 Non-Competition Covenants .
 either either
 rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 6




---



##### 



rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 7




---



##### 



Option Issued Pursuant to Plan.
 No Liability of Option.
 No Assignment.
 Governing Law.
 Entire Agreement.
 Notice .
 rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 8




---



##### 



ZIX CORPORATIONDate:  4-27-07
    By:
    /s/ Barry W. WilsonBarry W.WilsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer rev date 03/19/07
    
    Change in Control
 9




---



##### 



Zix Corporation (TX)2711 N. Haskell Avenue
    
    Signature PageSuite 2200
    
    Sign and return to the legal departmentDallas, Texas 75204United States
  Effective Date of Grant:
    
    December 18, 2006Name of Optionee:
    
    Spurr, RickNumber of Shares:
    
    400,000.00Exercise Price:
    
    $1.50Plan Name:
    
    2001 Stock Option PlanExpiration Date:
    
    December 17, 2016
 Vesting Schedule:
    
    Number of Shares:
    
    Vest Date:33,333.33
    
    
    March 18, 200733,333.33
    
    
    June 18, 200733,333.33
    
    
    September 18, 200733,333.33
    
    
    December 18, 200733,333.33
    
    
    March 18, 200833,333.33
    
    
    June 18, 200833,333.33
    
    
    September 18, 200833,333.33
    
    
    December 18, 200833,333.33
    
    
    March 18, 200933,333.33
    
    
    June 18, 200933,333.33
    
    
    September 18, 200933,333.33
    
    
    December 18, 2009
 /s/ Richard D. Spurr
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    4-30-07Optionee Signature