alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James G. Thomasch, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) [Paragraph omitted inaccordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986];

 

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 11, 2004 | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|               | James G. Thomasch       |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Author:

Section/Area:

Release Date:

Notes:
Mark E. McKinnon

Matthew J. Clark

Mark.McKinnon@dentons.com

Matthew.Clark@dentons.com

D 703.336.8708

D 703.336.8714

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

United States

T 703.336.8800

F 703.336.8750

Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

July 22, 2015

To Whom it May Concern:

RTI Group, LLC (RTI) was issued Exemption No. 11946 on June 30, 2015 (hereinafter "the 

Exemption"), allowing commercial operation of small UAS for aerial data collection. RTI hereby 

requests an amendment to Conditions and Limitations No. 2 of the Exemption to authorize UAS 

operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming. A copy of RTI's

Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual, which contains proprietary and confidential 

information, was submitted electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov on June 25, 2015.

RTI believes an amendment authorizing closed-set motion picture and television filming is in 

the public's interest as it would reduce hazards and emissions associated with alternate use of 

helicopters to conductsimilar closed-set filming operations. RTI's UAS are light weight and do not 

carry any flammable fuel, further reducing the risk from any potential accident. As this is an 

amendment to an existing exemption that seeks to add closed-set motion picture and television 

filming, RTI respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published 

in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

If you have any questions, or need any additional information to process the requested 

amendment to the Exemption, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. 

Very truly yours,

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: RTI Group, LLC Petition to Amend Exemption No. 11946 (Docket No. FAA-2015-

1455)
 

U.S. Department of Transportation

July 22, 2015

Page 2

Counsel for RTI Group, LLC

Attachment
 

U.S. Department of Transportation

July 22, 2015

Page 3

(The following attached item was submitted under separate cover as it contains proprietary and

commercial information exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §

522 et seq., and should be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b)).

Attachments:

RTI Motion Picture and UAS Operations Manual
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 15


                                                       [LOGO OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN]

Report of Independent Public Accountants

To Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of
Education Management Corporation (a Pennsylvania corporation) and Subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, the related condensed consolidated statements
of income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2001
and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modification that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Education Management Corporation
and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 (not presented herein), and, in our report
dated July 27, 2001, we expressed an unqualified opinion on that statement. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.


                                            /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
October 23, 2001
# C_2018112EN.01004501.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/45

---

Action brought on 7 February 2018 — Sonova Holding v EUIPO (HEAR THE WORLD)

(Case T-70/18)

(2018/C 112/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sonova Holding AG (Stäfa, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Pansch and A. Sabellek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘HEAR THE WORLD’ — Application for registration No 15 274 426

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2017 in Case R 1645/2017-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Serial Release - Ready for Signature Action in LSRTIS (Specialist 

and BCA Duties)

CVB-WI-0088 04

ICWI0058.02

CVB-WI-IC

12 Aug 2021

CVB-Released
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 527 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 527

      Supporting the goals and ideals of American Education Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

  Mr. Joyce (for himself, Mr. Takano, Mr. Ashford, Ms. Esty, and Mr. 
 Honda) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Supporting the goals and ideals of American Education Week.

Whereas November 16 through November 20, 2015, marks the 94th annual observance 
        of American Education Week;
Whereas public schools are the backbone of the Nation's democracy, providing 
        young people with the tools they need to maintain the Nation's precious 
        values of freedom, civility, and equality;
Whereas, by equipping young people in the United States with both practical 
        skills and broader intellectual abilities, public schools give them hope 
        for, and access to, a productive future;
Whereas people working in the field of public education, be they teachers, 
        higher education faculty and staff, paraeducators, custodians, 
        substitute educators, bus drivers, clerical workers, food service 
        professionals, workers in skilled trades, health and student service 
        workers, security guards, technical employees, or librarians, work 
        tirelessly to serve children and communities throughout the Nation with 
        care and professionalism; and
Whereas public schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults, 
        children, educators, volunteers, business leaders, and elected officials 
        in a common enterprise: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of American Education 
        Week; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        American Education Week by reflecting on the positive impact of 
        all those who work together to educate children.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael T. Prior, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                      | Atlantic   Tele-Network, Inc. |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                      |                               |
| Date:   May 10, 2011 | By:                                | /s/   Michael T. Prior |
|                      |                               | Michael   T. Prior |
|                      |                               | President   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Eloise Shepherd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Beth Hassett-Sipple" <hassett-sipple.beth@epa.gov>, 

"Rosalina Rodriguez" <rodriguez.rosalina@epa.gov>, "Karen Martin" <martin.karen@epa.gov>, 

"Bryan Hubbell" <hubbell.bryan@epa.gov>, "Darryl Weatherhead" 

<Weatherhead.Darryl@epamail.epa.gov>

Date: 06/04/2012 11:48 PM

Subject: Re: follow up calls tomorrow

Thank you Nathan for letting me know you got my message and have scheduled 

the calls. Eloise will send you the schedule notices in the morning so that 

you can send them to the appropriate people for each call. 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Frey, Nathan J." [Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 06/05/2012 02:42 AM GMT

To: Lydia Wegman

Cc: Eloise Shepherd

Subject: follow up calls tomorrow

Hi Lydia,

I received your voicemail from a bit after 6:00pm tonight and I just wanted 

to circle back with you about scheduling follow up calls tomorrow. As we 

discussed, I have scheduled the follow up interagency discussion for 10:00 am 

tomorrow. In addition, I have held 1:00 - 2:30 with folks here to follow up 

on the remaining issues that we did not touch on in today's call and I have 

also held 3:00 - 4:00 to discuss the RIA.

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss. Happy 

to chat before our first call if you like.

Thanks,

Nathan
May 29, 1997

18600

#### Bunch v. Souza

Affirmed
#### State v. Seguin

21322

12/7/98

Vacated & Remanded
July 21, 1999

22134

#### McGill v. Joy

Affirmed
Order No. 97-44

18187

April 29, 1997

#### State v. Siga

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 648 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 648

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting budget-
                        related points of order.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

   Mr. Renacci (for himself, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Brat, Mr. Amodei, Mr. 
Westerman, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Ribble, Mr. Barletta, Mr. 
 Barr, and Mrs. Brooks of Indiana) submitted the following resolution; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting budget-
                        related points of order.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``12.(a) It shall not be in order to consider a resolution reported 
by the Committee on Rules providing for the consideration of a bill or 
joint resolution that waives, or has the effect of waiving, any budget-
related point of order unless the resolution specifies each such point 
of order.
    ``(b)(1) Upon consideration of a resolution reported by the 
Committee on Rules providing for the consideration of a bill or joint 
resolution, it shall be in order to offer a motion to strike or amend 
any provision of the resolution that waives, or has the effect of 
waiving, the application of a budget-related point of order in order to 
eliminate any such waiver from the resolution.
    ``(2) A motion made pursuant to subparagraph (1)--
            ``(A) shall be privileged;
            ``(B) shall be debatable for 20 minutes, divided evenly 
        between those in favor of the motion and those opposed to the 
        motion; and
            ``(C) may not be amended.
    ``(3) At the conclusion of any debate on a motion made pursuant to 
subparagraph (1), the previous question shall be considered as ordered. 
It shall not be in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the 
motion is agreed to or disagreed to.
    ``(c) In this clause, the term `budget-related point of order' 
means--
            ``(1) in the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
        Act of 1974--
                    ``(A) section 302(f);
                    ``(B) section 303;
                    ``(C) section 306(b);
                    ``(D) section 311; or
                    ``(E) section 401; and
            ``(2) clause 10 of rule XXI.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019213EN.01003401.xml

| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Fissler v EUIPO (vita)

(Case T-423/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark vita - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptiveness - Concept of characteristic - Name of a colour - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 213/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Fissler GmbH (Idar-Oberstein, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and K. Middelhoff, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 March 2018 (Case R 1326/2017-5), relating to an application for registration of the word sign vita as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 March 2018 (Case R 1326/2017-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 March 2018 (Case R 1326/2017-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 774 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 774

 Expressing support for designation of the week of June 6 through June 
                  12, 2016, as ``Hemp History Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2016

Mr. Polis (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, and Ms. Bonamici) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                              Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of the week of June 6 through June 
                  12, 2016, as ``Hemp History Week''.

Whereas Hemp History Week will be held from June 6 through June 12, 2016;
Whereas the goals of Hemp History Week are to commemorate the historical 
        relevance of industrial hemp in the United States and to promote the 
        full growth potential of the industrial hemp industry;
Whereas industrial hemp is an agricultural commodity that has been used for 
        centuries to produce many innovative industrial and consumer products, 
        including soap, fabric, textiles, construction materials, clothing, 
        paper, cosmetics, food, and beverages;
Whereas the global market for hemp is estimated to consist of more than 25,000 
        products;
Whereas the value of hemp imported into the United States for use in the 
        production of other retail products is estimated at approximately 
        $76,000,000 annually;
Whereas the United States hemp industry estimates that the annual market value 
        of hemp retail sales in the United States is more than $570,000,000;
Whereas despite the legitimate uses of hemp, many agricultural producers of the 
        United States are prohibited under current law from growing hemp;
Whereas because most hemp cannot be grown legally in the United States, raw hemp 
        material and hemp products are imported for sale in the United States;
Whereas the United States is the largest consumer of hemp products in the world, 
        but the United States is the only major industrialized country that 
        restricts hemp farming;
Whereas industrial hemp holds great potential to bolster the agricultural 
        economy of the United States; and
Whereas the week of June 6 through June 12, 2016, would be an appropriate week 
        to designate as ``Hemp History Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Hemp History Week'';
            (2) recognizes the historical relevance of industrial hemp; 
        and
            (3) recognizes the growing economic potential of industrial 
        hemp.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 24, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: July 14, 2014, Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants

SUMMARY

Karl Brooks and Ward Burns of EPA gave a summary presentation on July 14, 2014, to 

the Utilities State Government Organization (USGO). The majority of the presentation centered 

on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Karl Brooks

Ward Burns

Other Attendees included members of 

Utilities State Government Organizationattendee list not available.
# C_2022472EN.01005001.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/50

---

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2022 — Iccrea Banca v Commission and SRB

(Joined Case T-386/18 and T-400/19) (1)

(2022/C 472/59)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---