alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Date: 20150516 Revision: 1.0 Revision:1.0

Page 1 of 1

PRIVACY INFORMATION - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Appendix B 

PRIVACY POLICY

One area of notable concern requiring attention regarding public and civil use of UAS technologies is 

personal privacy. Rupestrian CyberServices believes that respect of individual privacy guaranteed by 

our Constitution and the Fourth Amendment are sacrosanct and the potential for UAS technology to 

usurp those rights is very real. As with all new technology, we must move slowly in its application as 

we seek to include it in our daily lives. There are many emotional issues to overcome in the use of 

UAS technologies and part of our job in the UAS community is to ensure we educate and gain the 

trust of all people to ensure we are ever mindful of their privacy concerns. 

Rupestrian CyberServices will comply with any federal, state, and/or local privacy policies or rules 

that may apply in particular areas where DJI UAS are used. Further, because we will only fly over 

private property with the permission of the land owner, the likelihood that we will collect private 

information of an unknown person is minimal. Information provided to customers will be masked to 

include only the acreage for which they are responsible, further limiting the possibility of a trespass 

of privacy.

.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

National Animal Health Surveillance

System

Last Modified: 

Print

A comprehensive, coordinated, integrated surveillance system is the foundation for

animal health, public health, food safety, and environmental health.

Animal health surveillance is designed to detect threats to animal health in a timely

manner. APHIS Veterinary Services (VS) works with a vast network of partners to

carry out surveillance activities in the United States. Together, these partners work

to protect animal health, national economic viability, and the food supply. In

addition, these surveillance programs and efforts assure international trading

partners of the health of the Nation’s herd and safety of our livestock and livestock

products. Our national surveillance system also provides the tools necessary to
detect chemical or environmental agents that could affect animal health.

Surveillance helps rapidly detect foreign diseases and emerging issues, monitor and

prove actionable information for endemic diseases, and measure regional

prevalence of trade-significant diseases.

Surveillance Information by Commodity

Aquaculture 

Avian 

Cattle 

Cervid 

Equine 
Sheep and Goats 

Swine 

Reports

U.S. Status for Reportable Diseases: View information reported to the World

Organisation for Animal Health on the presence of animal diseases in the

United States.

2017 National Animal Health Surveillance System Report (1.28 MB)

2016 National Animal Health Surveillance System Report (1.32 MB)
# C_2019432EN.01005001.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2019 — E.I. Papadopoulos v EUIPO — Europastry (fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre)

(Case T-628/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre - Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 432/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA (Moschato-Tavros, Greece) (represented by: C. Chrysanthis, P.V. Chardalia and A. Vasilogamvrou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Europastry, SA (Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: L. Estropá Navarro, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2018 (Case R 493/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos and Europastry.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8115

DANTE A. JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN GREG HERSHBERGER; LIBRARIAN ADDIS N. KAMBULE; BRADLEY 

WOODFALL, Case Management Specialist; ASSISTANT WARDEN 

DENISE A. MORGAN; SERGEANT ROGER G. MUELLER; KELLY L. UPOLE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-00702-ELH)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dante A. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, 

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dante A. Jones appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Jones v. Hershberger, No. 1:12-cv-00702-ELH (D. Md. Dec. 

11, 2012). We deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138941 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138941 

 COA: 290881 

Kent CC: 07-008129-FH 

MICHELLE RENE WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### State v. Lafuente

22626

10/04/2000

Affirmed
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11163

Conference Calendar

 

RICARDO FRANCO, also known as

Ricardo Franco-Morales,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EDWIN V. KING, Honorable, Former Attorney, 

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:00-CV-1760-R

- - - - - - - - - -

February 14, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Franco, a Texas prisoner (# 850944), appeals from

the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2). Franco asserted that, after he was

convicted of a criminal offense in Texas state court, he hired as

his appellate attorney Edwin King, who has since been appointed

as a state judge. Franco stated that King failed to file an

appellate brief on his behalf and failed to refund the $5000 fee
No. 00-11163

-2-

he had paid the attorney. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in concluding that Franco had failed to state a

cognizable constitutional claim, because a defense attorney does

not act “under color of state law” for § 1983 purposes when he

performs a lawyer’s traditional functions as counsel to a

defendant in a criminal proceeding. Polk County v. Dodson, 454

U.S. 312, 325 (1981); Berry v. Brady, 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir.

1999).

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. 

 The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal as frivolous

by the district court each count as a “strike” for purposes of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88

(5th Cir. 1996). We caution Franco that once he accumulates

three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See § 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). 

 APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-019

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Issued April 2019 • Reviewed February 2024

PRACTICAL TIP

Grinding calcium 

tablets in a coffee 

grinder works well to 

make a powder. 

Mixing the powder 

thoroughly into the 

diet or combining the 

powder with beef or 

chicken blood helps 

ensure your cat will eat 

all of the supplement. 

DID YOU KNOW?

Not all calcium sources are alike. 

For example, it takes 4 times more 

calcium gluconate than calcium 

carbonate to give the same 

amount of calcium to your cat. 

Tips and Calculations: Adding Calcium to 

Boneless Meat Diets for Nondomestic Cats

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about nondomestic cat health and husbandry. 

Refer to the other topics covered in the series for more information on nondomestic cat care.

Boneless meat diets, such as ground turkey, ground beef, or 

boneless chicken, do not have enough calcium to support growth 

and strong bones. There are many forms of calcium you can 

add to the diet, but calcium carbonate is 

commonly available and easy to find.

HOW MUCH CALCIUM DO I ADD? 

It takes 5,000 milligrams (mg), or 5 grams, of calcium carbonate

to balance 1 pound of boneless meat. That is ten 500-mg tablets 

or about 4 teaspoons of powder (when using products labeled 

600 mg for each 1⁄2 teaspoon) per pound of meat. 

Sample Calculations

A bobcat fed 1.5 pounds of meat:

Calcium carbonate powder (600 mg per 1⁄2 teaspoon)

l 1.5 (pounds of meat) x 4 (teaspoons per pound) = 6 teaspoons POWDER/day

Calcium carbonate tablets (500 mg each)

l 1.5 (pounds of meat) x 10 (tablets per pound) = 15 TABLETS/day

BONE MEAL AS A SOURCE OF CALCIUM 

Human-grade bone meal is a great choice. However, because it is a mix of both calcium 

and phosphorus, a larger amount of bone meal is needed to balance a boneless meat diet 

compared to calcium carbonate alone. Calcium amounts in bone meal vary greatly from 

product to product, so consult your veterinarian or veterinary nutritionist. 

CAUTION! Ensure the commercial bone meal product you select is tested for heavy metals 

and other contaminants. This information may be found on the label or you may need to 

contact the manufacturer. Bone meal labeled for garden use should never be fed to animals. 

The calcium sources mentioned here are some of the most common, but there are other 

options as well. Consulting a veterinarian experienced with nutrition for nondomestic cats or 

a veterinary nutritionist may be helpful as you decide on the best approach for your cats.

A tiger fed 12 pounds of meat:

Calcium carbonate powder (600 mg per 1⁄2 teaspoon)

l 12 (pounds of meat) x 4 (teaspoons per pound) = 48 teaspoons

POWDER/day

Calcium carbonate tablets (500 mg each)

l 12 (pounds of meat) x 10 (tablets per pound) = 120 TABLETS/day

CALCIUM 

GLUCONATE

CALCIUM 

CARBONATE

=
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39332

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JEFFREY ALAN TRUMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 577

Filed: August 6, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Gregory M. Culet, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

In 2008, Jeffrey Alan Truman was found guilty of lewd conduct with a minor under

sixteen years and sexual abuse of a minor. The district court sentenced Truman to a unified term 

of thirty years, with a minimum period of confinement of twenty years, for lewd conduct with a 

minor under sixteen years and a concurrent unified term of fifteen years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of ten years, for sexual abuse of a minor. Truman appealed and, on 

December 16, 2010, this Court vacated Truman’s judgment of conviction for sexual abuse of a 

minor. On May 18, 2011, the district court entered an amended judgment of conviction 

removing the conviction for sexual abuse of a minor. On September 13, 2011, Truman filed an 

I.C.R 35 motion for reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. Truman appeals.
2

Idaho Criminal Rule 35 vests the district court with jurisdiction to consider a motion to 

reduce a sentence as long as it is filed within 120 days of the entry of the judgment imposed. 

The 120-day filing limit is a jurisdictional restraint on the power of the court and deprives the 

district court of the authority to entertain an untimely motion. State v. Fox, 122 Idaho 550, 552, 

835 P.2d 1361, 1363 (Ct. App. 1992); State v. Hocker, 119 Idaho 105, 106, 803 P. 2d 1011, 1012 

(Ct. App. 1991). The filing of an appeal on the original sentence does not toll the time frame for 

filing a Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence. State v. Payan, 132 Idaho 614, 619, 977 P. 2d 

228, 233 (Ct. App. 1998). 

Truman acknowledges that his Rule 35 motion was filed outside the time limits of 

Rule 35. The district court entered an amended judgment of conviction deleting Truman’s 

sexual abuse of a minor language, but did not alter Truman’s sentence for lewd conduct with a 

minor under sixteen. Truman’s sentence for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen did not

affect the 120-day jurisdictional period. See State v. Lindquist, 122 Idaho 190, 832 P.2d 761 (Ct. 

App. 1992) (clarification of sentence is not imposition of new sentence which triggers a new 

jurisdictional time period for filing motion for reconsideration). Therefore, the district court’s 

order denying Truman’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,   Ian M. Herman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:  April 10, 2008 |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Ian M.Herman       
|                       |  | Ian M. Herman          
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |                        

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 705 

Expressing support for designation of June as ‘‘National Men’s Cancer 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2016 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. 

PLASKETT, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. PETERS, Ms. HAHN, Mr. ASHFORD, Ms. 

BROWN of Florida, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. MOORE, Mr. POCAN, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. LEE, Mrs. 

DINGELL, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. LEWIS, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of June as ‘‘National 

Men’s Cancer Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas 1 in 2 men will be diagnosed with cancer over the 

course of their lifetimes; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC), cancer claims the lives of nearly 

300,000 men annually in the United States; 

Whereas the CDC also reports that the incidence of cancer 

for men varies by race and ethnicity, with minority men 

having the highest cancer incidence and mortality rates; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 705 IH 

Whereas statistics show that a higher percentage of men will 

die from cancer than women because they are typically 

diagnosed at a later stage; 

Whereas despite advances in medical technology and research, men continue to live an average of 5 fewer years 

compared to their female counterparts; 

Whereas ‘‘National Men’s Health Week’’, which is annually 

celebrated as the week leading up to, and including Father’s Day, was established in 1994 by the United States 

Congress, to show how simple diagnostic and screening 

tests can save lives; 

Whereas promoting awareness and education about men’s 

cancer is crucial to improving the health and well-being 

of men across the Nation, facilitating early detection, improving the prognoses of men who have been diagnosed 

with the disease, and ultimately preventing further loss of 

life; and 

Whereas June would be an appropriate month to designate 

as ‘‘National Men’s Cancer Awareness Month’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Men’s Cancer 

3 Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) encourages the Federal Government, States, 

5 localities, and nonprofit organizations to observe the 

6 month with appropriate awareness programs and 

7 educational activities, with the goal of increasing 

8 public knowledge of cancers disproportionately af9 fecting men; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 705 IH 

1 (3) recognizes the profound toll a diagnosis of 

2 cancer has on men, families, and communities and 

3 pledges to make its prevention and cure a public 

4 health priority; and 

5 (4) urges public and private sector efforts to 

6 promote awareness, invest in research, and improve 

7 treatments for men’s cancers. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
# C_2019172EN.01000701.xml

| 20.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/7

---

Appeal brought on 30/11/2018 by Harry Shindler and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 26 November 2018 in Case T-458/17 Shindler and Others v Council

(Case C-755/18 P)

(2019/C 172/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Harry Shindler and Others (represented by J. Fouchet, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

By order of 19 March 2019, the Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) dismissed the appeal.

---
#### Criterion Service, Inc., Appellant, *v.*City of East Cleveland, Appellee.

(No. 31931

Decided December 14, 1949.)

*Messrs. Rocker & Schwarts,*and *Mr. Francis B. Douglass,*for appellant.

*Mr. E. A. Binyon,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable' constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart and Turner, JJ., concur.
# C_2019328EN.01004601.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-53/18) (1)

(Approximation of laws - Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 - Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 - Construction products - Harmonised standards EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 328/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by T. Henze and J. Möller, and subsequently by J. Möller, acting as Agents, and by M. Winkelmüller, F. van Schewick and M. Kottmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of, first, Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1995 of 6 November 2017 to maintain in the Official Journal of the European Union the reference of harmonised standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 on static thermoplastic tanks for above-ground storage of domestic heating oils, kerosene and diesel fuels in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2017 L 288, p. 36) and, second, Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1996 of 6 November 2017 to maintain in the Official Journal of the European Union the reference of harmonised standard EN 12285-2:2005 on Workshop fabricated steel tanks in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2017 L 288, p. 39)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

140213 & (29) 

CHARLES LAMONT SMILES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140213 

 COA: 293427 

Chippewa CC: 09-010401-AH 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

default judgment is DENIED.