alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,224)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,730
<PP&E>                                          85,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,926)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,658
<BONDS>                                         50,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,575
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,086)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (95,795)
<SALES>                                         33,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,410
<CGS>                                           24,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (460)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,939,489
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,004,551
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      92,597,348
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        91,816,000
<LOANS>                                    283,704,065
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,103,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             396,755,106
<DEPOSITS>                                 318,705,367
<SHORT-TERM>                                17,900,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          7,556,345
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,648,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,936,592
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,008,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             396,755,106
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             22,060,098
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,867,629
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               639,761
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            28,567,488
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          15,183,543
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,705,236
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,862,252
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   66,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,520,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,708,849
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,403,505
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,403,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.17
<LOANS-NON>                                    721,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   315,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               798,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,418,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,076,038
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   51,970
<RECOVERIES>                                    13,445
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,103,513
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,103,513
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      174
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   507
<PP&E>                                             243
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,324
<SALES>                                            601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   601
<CGS>                                              427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.08
        

</TABLE>
#### Ching v. Ching

20196

2/5/98

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0242

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DYLAN MIKKEL OHL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 18, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 11 2022

03/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0242
#### State v. Valdez

20645

9/11/98

Affirmed
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6691

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MALCOLM DEMON TYLER, a/k/a Milt , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:13

- cr - 00009

- FPS

- JES

- 2; 5:16

- cv - 00094

- FPS

- JES )

Submitted : October 31, 2017 Decided: December 4, 2017

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Malcolm Demon Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Malcolm Demon Tyler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Before addressing the merits of Tyler’s ap peal, we
must first be assured that we ha ve jurisdiction. Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015). We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 ( 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter , 803 F.3d at 696 (internal quotation marks omit ted); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Generally, “a final decision is one that ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs & Participating Emp’rs , 134 S. Ct. 773, 779 (2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Regardless of the label given a district court decision, if it appears from the record that the district court has not adjudicated all of the issues in a case, then the re is no final order.” Porter , 803 F.3d at 696. Tyler initially challenged his career offender designation based on Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) , pursuant to this c ourt’s authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. S ubsequently , Tyler was granted leave to supplement his habeas motion, and Tyl er filed a supplement raising claim s based on Mathis v. United
States , 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) . Because the district court did not resolve the Mathis claim s raised in Tyler’s supplement , we l ack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Porter , 803 F.3d at 695, 699.3 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory and remand to t he district court for consideration of Tyler’s Mathis claims. We express no opinion regarding the merits of Tyler’s claims. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
#### State v. Mattiello

21187

1/28/99

Affirmed
H. Res. 858 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 13, 2016. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3590) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical care. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 

Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
2 

•HRES 858 EH 

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Eddie L. SteinerEddie L. SteinerPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
otherwise stated in such filing.
FÍJESE EN LO SIGUIENTE

• Frutas duras, amargas y 

asimétricas con semillas 

abortadas pequeñas y 

oscuras

• Frutas que permanecen 

verdes aun cuando están 

maduras

• Hojas con manchas 

asimétricas

• Brotes amarillos

• Muerte regresiva de las 

ramillas 

• Árboles atrofi ados con 

escaso follaje que podrían 

fl orecer fuera de temporada

• Psílidos asiáticos de los 

cítricos visibles o sus 

secreciones cerosas

ENVERDECIMIENTO 

DE LOS CÍTRICOS

(TAMBIÉN LLAMADO HUANGLONGBING)

Color verde aun en frutas 

maduras

Semillas abortadas

Hojas con manchas asimétricas

HOJAS Y FRUTAS 

AFECTADAS POR LA ENFERMEDAD
EL DAÑO QUE CAUSA

El enverdecimiento de los cítricos (también llamado 

Huanglongbing, HLB) es una de las enfermedades más 

serias que afecta a los cítricos a nivel mundial. Una 

vez que un árbol se enferma, no hay cura. Aunque 

la enfermedad no representa una amenaza para los 

humanos o los animales, ha destruido millones de 

acres de cultivos de cítricos en los Estados Unidos y 

el extranjero. El enverdecimiento de los cítricos es 

propagado por un insecto infectado con la enfermedad, 

el psílido asiático de los cítricos (PAC), y ha puesto el 

futuro de los cítricos en los Estados Unidos en riesgo. 

Los árboles infectados producen frutas verdes, deformes 

y amargas, que no son adecuadas para la venta como 

frutas frescas o para hacer jugo. La mayoría de los árboles 

infectados muere luego de varios años. 

LO QUE USTED PUEDE HACER

• No transporte plantas o frutas cítricas de producción local 

de un estado a otro.

• Sólo compre frutas o árboles cítricos de transportistas 

que cumplan con las restricciones bajo cuarentenas 

federales. Pregúnteles a los vendedores si sus productos 

cumplen con las cuarentenas federales.

• Permita que los trabajadores agrícolas autorizados 

entren a su propiedad para inspeccionar si hay PAC. 

• Reporte cada vez que vea esta plaga en

PlagasHambrientas.com.

Para obtener más información, visite: 

Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección Sanitaria de Animales y Plantas

El Departamento de Agricultura de EEUU es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece igualdad de 

oportunidades. Material del programa núm. 2125-CG-S Publicado en septiembre de 2012

PLAGASHAMBRIENTAS.COM
Item_5.2_Glossary definition for “Poultry” / page 1 

Annex 4

**GLOSSARY**

***ANIMAL PRODUCTS***

means any parts of an *animal*, and raw or manufactured products containing any material derived from *animals*, excluding *germinal products*, *biological products* and *pathological material*.

***BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS***

means products of animal or microorganism origin, used as reagents in the diagnosis of diseases, for treatment, control and prevention of diseases, and in the collection and processing of *germinal products*.

***COMMODITY***

means live *animals*, *animal products*~~of animal origin~~,~~animal genetic material~~*germinal products*, *biological products* and *pathological material*.

***~~DEATH~~***

~~means the irreversible permanent loss of all vital functions brain activity demonstrable by the loss of brain stem reflexes. This may be confirmed through a combination of criteria such as dilated pupil and absence of corneal reflex, cardiac activity and breathing.~~

***EUTHANASIA***

means the killing of an animal ~~act of inducing death~~ for welfare purposes using a method that causes a rapid and irreversible loss of consciousness with minimum pain and distress ~~to animal~~.

***GERMINAL PRODUCTS***

means animal semen, oocytes, embryos and *hatching eggs*.

***~~GREAVES~~***

~~means the protein-containing residue obtained after the partial separation of fat and water during the process of rendering.~~

***~~ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION CENTRE~~SEMEN COLLECTION CENTRE*****

means an *approved* facility *~~approved~~*~~by the *Veterinary Authority* and which~~that meets the conditions set out in the *Terrestrial Code*for the collection, processing and~~/or~~ storage of semen.

***SLAUGHTER***

means the~~any~~killing~~procedure that causes the death of an animal by bleeding~~ of an animal~~s~~primarily intended for human consumption.

***STUNNING***

means any ~~mechanical, electrical, chemical or other~~ procedure that causes ~~rapid~~~~immediate~~ loss of consciousness for the purpose of killingwithout ~~minimal~~ avoidable distress, fear and pain ~~and other types of~~~~and suffering for the purpose of killing~~~~; when used before slaughter, the loss of consciousness lasts until death from the slaughter process.; in the absence of slaughter, the procedure would allow the animal to recover consciousness~~**.**

___________________________

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023	1

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023	1

Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission / February 2023	1
#### Smith, Richardson & Conroy, a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. Eugenia H. Cowan and Husband, *Appellees.*

Opinion Filed February 3, 1915.

Where a bill is filed by a corporation to enforce a lien for an indebtedness alleged to be due to it, for goods sold through an agency house alleged to be owned, maintained and controlled by the corporation, and the proof shows that the alleged agency house was owned by individuals not shown to be even interested in the corporation, the bill is propery dismissed.

Appeal from Circuit Court for St. Johns County; Geó. Couper Gibbs, Judge.

Decree affirmed.

*F.*IF. *Butler,*for Appellant;

*E. N. Calhoun,*for Appellees.

Cockrell, J.

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint, praying equitable relief against a married woman’s separate property, a certain hotel, for supplies furnished her while operating the hotel.

The account so sought to be enforced appears to be due to “St. Augustine Cold Storage Co., St. Augustine, Fla.,” and to obviate this apparent variance, the bill alleges that the complainant corporation “owned, maintained and controlled a certain mercantile establishment in the City of St. Augustine, Florida, in the said St. Johns County, operated under the name and style of St. Augustine Cold Storage Company.” The answer categorically denied *76this allegation. The complainant to meet this issue had as its witness the manager of this concern and' elicited from him that C. W. Richardson, F. P. Conroy and W. S. Barnett constituted the St. Augustine Cold Storage Company. He was again asked if “Smith, Richardson & Conroy did not own it,” and he replied Richardson, Conroy & Barnett. If Mr. Smith had any interest in it, I did not know it. The goods were shipped from Smith, Richardson & Conroy and billed from them. The bookkeeper (in St. Augustine) made the report to Smith, Richardson & Cqnroy. He always sent in a trial balance once a month.

We think this testimony failed to establish the issue; to the contrary, it shows that these individuals, who may or may not, have been interested in the complainant corporation, owned or constituted the St. Augustine Cold Storage Company, from whom these goods were bought, and upon this showing these individuals and not the corporation here suing are the creditors. v

We cannot therefore say the Circuit Court erred in dismissing the bill.

Decree affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,505                  11,657
<SECURITIES>                                     3,356                  11,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,801                  18,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,217                  44,742
<PP&E>                                           3,476                   3,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                     724                   1,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,183                  51,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,146                  12,830
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        32,170                  31,520
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,687                   4,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,183                  51,245
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,709                  31,484
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,526                  13,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,612                  17,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    678                   1,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                       297                   1,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                381                   (336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       381                   (336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03                   (.03)
        

</TABLE>
18813

#### State v. Waki

February 14, 1997

Order No. 97-12

Affirmed in part. Vacated in part