alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THIRTEEN AND
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 28,1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                        281,469
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 159,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,715)
<INVENTORY>                                   586,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,047,478
<PP&E>                                        239,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,213,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         729,152
<BONDS>                                       110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          914
<OTHER-SE>                                    366,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,213,499
<SALES>                                     2,189,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,189,133
<CGS>                                       1,885,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,885,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              238,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                62,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            38,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   38,274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .40
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 596 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 596

   Recognizing the 146th anniversary of the ratification of the 15th 
          amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2016

Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the 146th anniversary of the ratification of the 15th 
          amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Whereas February 3, 2016, is the 146th anniversary of the ratification of the 
        15th amendment to the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas the 15th amendment prohibits the government from denying a citizen the 
        right to vote based on race; and
Whereas it is important to continue to ensure the ability of all United States 
        citizens to participate fully in the electoral process: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 146th anniversary of the ratification of 
        the 15th amendment to the Constitution of the United States; 
        and
            (2) acknowledges the significance of the 15th amendment and 
        continues to support its goals and ideals.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019423EN.01005201.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/52

---

Order of the General Court of 25 September 2019 — Triantafyllopoulos and Others v ECB

(Case T-451/18) (1)

(Action for damages - Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB - Limitation period - Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Causal link - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2019/C 423/66)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos (Patras, Greece) and the 487 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: N. Ioannou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernandez Saseta and M. Anastasiou, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking reparation for harm which was allegedly caused to the applicants due to the inadequate supervision by the ECB of Trapeza tis Ellados (National Bank of Greece) which, for its part, inadequately supervised Αchaiki Syneteristiki Τrapeza Syn. PE (the Achaiki Cooperative Bank, Greece), in which the applicants hold shares.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
# C_2018161EN.01005801.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/58

---

Action brought on 1 March 2018 — BPCE and Others v ECB

(Case T-146/18)

(2018/C 161/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and 36 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and P. Kupka, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Article 4 of ECB Decision No ECB/SSM/2017 — 9695005MSX1OYEMGDF46/338 (taken together with its annex) of 19 December 2017, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken regarding irrevocable payment commitments in respect of the deposit guarantee schemes or the resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of ECB Decision No ECB/SSM/2017 — 9695005MSX1OYEMGDF46/338 (taken together with its annex) of 19 December 2017, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken regarding irrevocable payment commitments in respect of the deposit guarantee schemes or the resolution funds;

| — | order the ECB to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-143/18, Societe Generale v ECB.

Societe Generale

ECB

---
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, W. Edd Helms, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc.:

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting; and


Date:  March 25, 2005


/s/ W. Edd Helms__________________________
By:   W. Edd Helms
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
December 9, 1997

20517

#### FC-S NO. 94-03270, In Interest of

Affirmed
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the AnnualReport of Home Solutions of America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JeffreyM. Mattich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1)     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date: March 31, 2006 | /s/ Jeffrey M. MattichJeffrey M. Mattich, Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
[748 NYS2d 832]

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Felipe Betances, Respondent. The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jerry Walker, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 3, 2002

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert T.*Johnson, *District Attorney,*Bronx *(Joseph N. Ferdenzi*and *Peter A. Sell*of counsel), for appellant. *Legal Aid So*
      *446
      *ciety,*Brooklyn *(Andrew C. Fine*and *Susan Epstein*of counsel), for Felipe Betances, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Orders entered September 7, 2001, to the extent appealed from, reversed, on the law and the facts, defendants’ motions denied, informations reinstated, and the matters remanded for further proceedings.

The power to dismiss an accusatory instrument in the interest of justice should be exercised sparingly, only in those rare cases where there is a “compelling factor” which clearly demonstrates that conviction or prosecution of the defendant would result in injustice *(see,*CPL 170.40 [1]; 210.40 [1]; *People v Dunlap,*216 AD2d 215, 217). We find no such compelling factor in either of the companion appeals now before us. Defendants are alleged to have offered a female undercover police officer money for sex, while driving their cars in an area of the Bronx in which prostitution-related activity is said to be rampant. The community’s interest in countering the widespread incidence of these types of offenses weighs heavily against dismissal *(see, People v Hinzmann, 111*Misc 2d 531, 534-535; *see also, People v Crespo,*244 AD2d 563, 564, *lv denied*91 NY2d 925). Neither the defendants’ lack of a criminal history nor the prospect of forfeiture of their vehicles is sufficient, without more, to justify the extraordinary remedy of dismissal in the interest of justice under CPL 170.40 *(see, People v Crespo, supra,*244 AD2d at 564; *People v Stewart,*230 AD2d 116, 121-122, *appeal dismissed*91 NY2d 900).

McCooe, J.P., Gangel-Jacob and Schoenfeld, JJ., concur.
Williams, Renee (OST) TUdV-e^ 1)QT- OST-/?^? - Z?^" ^ 

From: Cindy Clary [cclaryl @twcny.rr.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:14 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Cc: supervisor@town.massena.ny.us 

Subject: Cape air Contract 

To whom it may concern 

I am writing to express my concern in the up coming contract for the Massena airport.Cape Air has serviced this 

area with reUability and professionalism. They have been open to new ideas to better support our community 

and its needs. Cape Air employees in Massena personally went out of their way to make accommodations for 

family members during a difficult circumstance, when a family member became rapidly ill. I urge you to look at 

what is offered, their service, loyalty and commitment to the community. Has anyone given consideration to 

Gulf Stream International financial status? All their information is available on the internet. It's doubtful at best. 

We need to avoid any interruption of service to our area. We do not need another "BIG SKY" on our hands. 

Please do not let any personal issues sway your decision. 

Thank you for your Time. 

Sincerely, 

Cindy Clary 

Massena resident
January 21, 1998

19946

#### Law Offices of John A. Chanin v. Parnar; Parnar v. Law Offices of John A. Chanin

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 868 

Honoring the life of Jacob Wetterling and the efforts of Patty Wetterling 

and the Wetterling family to find abducted children and support their families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 

Mr. EMMER of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. KLINE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. WALZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Jacob Wetterling and the efforts of 

Patty Wetterling and the Wetterling family to find abducted children and support their families. 

Whereas Patty and Jerry Wetterling faced the unimaginable 

tragedy of having their 11-year-old son, Jacob 

Wetterling, abducted near their home in Stearns County, 

Minnesota, on October 22, 1989; 

Whereas Jacob Wetterling was taken at gunpoint and his disappearance remained unsolved for nearly 27 years; 

Whereas Jacob Wetterling’s body was not recovered until 

September of 2016; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 868 IH 

Whereas Patty Wetterling bravely turned her grief into action 

and devoted her life to advocating for missing and exploited children; 

Whereas Patty Wetterling has become a nationally recognized 

educator on child abduction and the sexual exploitation 

of children; 

Whereas Patty Wetterling serves on the Board of Directors 

of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children; 

Whereas Patty Wetterling and her husband co-founded the 

Jacob Wetterling Resource Center to educate communities about child safety issues to prevent child exploitation and abductions; 

Whereas Patty Wetterling authored the publication ‘‘When 

Your Child is Missing: A Family Survival Guide’’, along 

with 4 other families; 

Whereas Patty Wetterling served for more than 7 years as 

Director of Sexual Violence Prevention for the Minnesota 

Department of Health; 

Whereas the Star Tribune selected Patty Wetterling as one 

of the ‘‘100 Most Influential Minnesotans of the Century’’; 

Whereas Patty Wetterling’s efforts led to the passage of the 

Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually 

Violent Offender Registration Act (Public Law 103–322; 

108 Stat. 2038), a Federal law that requires States to 

implement a sex offender and crimes against children 

registry; and 

Whereas Jacob Wetterling’s memory lives on through the efforts of the Wetterling family: Now, therefore, be it 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 868 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives hon2 ors— 

3 (1) the life of Jacob Wetterling; and 

4 (2) the efforts of Patty Wetterling and the 

5 Wetterling family to prevent child exploitation and 

6 abductions across the United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### IN RE: In the Matter of the Complaint of LARRY DOIRON, INCORPORATED as Owner and Operator of the Barge Pogo and M/V Billy Joe for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability Larry Doiron, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee Robert Jackson, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee v. Specialty Rental Tools & Supply, L.L.P.; Oil States Energy Services, L.L.C.; Zurich American Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants

No. 16-30217

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

FILED July 7, 2017

Alan David Ezkovich, Attorney, Clarence William Emory, Georges M. Legrand, Mouledoux, Bland, Legrand *&*Brackett, *354L.L.C., Aaron James Weidenhaft, Ezko-vich <& Company, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark Lynn Clark, Robert Jeffrey Bridger, Esq., Thompson, Coe, Cousins *&*Irons, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Harold Kemler Watson, Ivan Mauricio Rodriguez, Chaffe McCall, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Alan R. Davis, Chaffe McCall, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Amici Curiae Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty International Underwriters.

Richard K Leefe, Attorney, Leefe, Gibbs, Sullivan, Dupre’ & Aldous, L.L.C., Metairie, LA, for Amicus Curiae Crescent Energy Services, L.L.C.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
#### Irby *v.*Allen & Company.

This ease coming before this court for a decision by six Justices, the question being whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the trial court, and the Justices of this court being divided in opinion on that question, Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed, and Beck, P. J., and Hill and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. Civil Code (1910), § 6116.

No. 4802.

February 19, 1926.

Appeal and Error 4 C. J. p. 1122, n. 35.

*859Certiorari; from Court of Appeals. 33 *Ga. App.*362.

*J. V. Poole,*for plaintiff.

*Dorsey, Brewster, Howell & Heyman*and *Marie Bolding,*for defendant.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 670 

Expressing support for the designation of May 5, 2016, as a ‘‘National 

Day of Reason’’ and recognizing the importance of reason in the betterment of humanity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2016 

Mr. HONDA (for himself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 5, 2016, 

as a ‘‘National Day of Reason’’ and recognizing the 

importance of reason in the betterment of humanity. 

Whereas the application of reason has proven to offer hope 

for human survival upon Earth, improving conditions 

within the universe, and cultivating intelligent, moral, 

and ethical interactions among people and their environments; 

Whereas those who wrote the Constitution of the United 

States, the basic document for governing the affairs of 

humankind within the United States, based it upon principles delineated within the philosophies distinguishing 

the historical Age of Reason; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 670 IH 

Whereas most citizens of the United States purport to value 

reason and its application; 

Whereas it is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to 

promote the development and application of reason; and 

Whereas May 5, 2016, would be an appropriate date to designate as a ‘‘National Day of Reason’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Day 

3 of Reason’’; and 

4 (2) encourages all citizens, residents, and visi5 tors to join in observing this day and focusing upon 

6 the employment of reason, critical thought, the sci7 entific method, and free inquiry to the resolution of 

8 human problems and for the welfare of humankind. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Jesse T. Davis & Son, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Twelve Linden Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

January 8, 1959.

*Ticknor & Ticknor*for Bedford Lake Park Corp., defendant.

*Robert R. Rosan*for plaintiff.

James W. Bailey, J.

Defendant, Bedford Lake Park Corp., makes application to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is maintained to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for building materials delivered to the premises owned by the *200moving defendant but occupied by contract vendees who had been allowed to take possession before they acquired title. The improvements for which the lien was imposed were commenced by the vendees before they acquired title.

Section 3 of the Lien Law sanctions a lien against an owner of property when labor is performed or material is supplied for the improvement of his property at his request or with his consent. The improvements herein were not made by the owner but by the vendees in possession and did not inure to his benefit because he was under contract to sell the premises. Under such circumstances an affirmative act is required on his part before he may be subjected to a lien for the improvements. His mere acquiescence to the installation thereof is not sufficient. *(Delany & Co.*v. *Duvoli,*278 N. Y. 328; *Beck*v. *Catholic Univ.,*172 N. Y. 387.)

The complaint fails to allege any affirmative act by the owner and the bare conelusory allegation that the vendees in possession acted as his agent is not sufficient to sustain the complaint. *(Didier*v. *Macfadden Pub.,*299 N. Y. 49; *Bornhorst*v. *Lyon,*279 App. Div. 820; *Farjeon*v. *Fulton Securities Co.,*225 App. Div. 541.)

Application granted with leave to plaintiff to plead anew within 20 days if so advised.

Submit order.
21521

#### State v. Haunreiter

Affirmed
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

QA Process for Serial Release

CVB-WI-0162 02

ICWI1110.02

CVB-WI-IC

29 Mar 2022

CVB-Released