alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019406EN.01002901.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (Nature’s Variety Instinct)

(Case T-287/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Nature’s Variety Instinct - Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 406/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: M.I. Industries, Inc. (Lincoln, Nebraska, United States) (represented by: M. Montañá Mora and S. Sebe Marin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Natural Instinct Ltd (Southwark, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Yates, Solicitor, and N. Zweck, Barrister)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 March 2018 (Case R 1659/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Natural Instinct and M.I. Industries.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders M.I. Industries, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders M.I. Industries, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018

---
REBOTTLING / REPROCESSING WORKSHEET

(9 CFR 114.17 and VS Memo 800.62, Section V.)

(9 CFR 114.18 and VS Memo 800.62 VI.A-C)

ICFRM0006.04 (20Jan17) jmw

TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BIOLOGICS COMPLIANCE ASSISTANT

 Rebottling Reprocessing

Firm ________________________________________ Est. No. ____________________________________

Product Code _________________________________ Serial No.___________________________________

Original Release Date (if applicable) _______________ Original APHIS Disposition_____________________

Information to Review (circle correct response)

1. APHIS Form 2008 marked “Other - Rebottling” or

“To be Reprocessed & Retested? YES NO 

2. Reason for rebottling/reprocessing provided? YES NO 

3. Detailed methods for rebottling/reprocessing provided? YES NO

Comments:

BCA _______________________________________Date ________________
December 29, 2004

25681

#### State v. Malufau

Affirmed
Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation 

21781 Aviation Avenue 

Georgetown, Delaware 1994 7 

Phone:302-854-0244 

January 11, 2015 

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

c/o U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

800 Independence A venue 

Washington, D.C. 20591-0004 

To Whom It May Concern: 

The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization based at the 

Sussex County Airport, Georgetown, Delaware, is the holder of Exemption 

8702D and Exemption 10872. The mailing address on both of these exemptions is 

21513 Rudder Lane, Georgetown, De 1994 7. 

Due to new street construction at the Sussex County Airport, and reassignment of 

addresses at the airport to conform to Emergency Management requests, our new 

mailing address is: 21781 Aviation A venue, Georgetown Delaware, 1994 7. Our 

physical location has not changed, just the mailing address as assigned by 

Emergency Management and the U.S. Postal Service. 

I am requesting the mailing address of record for both of the above referenced 

FAA Exemptions, be changed to 21781 Aviation A venue, Georgetown Delaware 

19947. 

Larry D. Kelley 

VP and Executive Director 

Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation 

1
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 73

 Recognizing the importance of trade to the United States economy and 
  the importance of completing free trade agreements with Pacific Rim 
                   countries and the European Union.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2015

    Mr. Frelinghuysen submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the importance of trade to the United States economy and 
  the importance of completing free trade agreements with Pacific Rim 
                   countries and the European Union.

Whereas international trade is an efficient means to create private sector jobs;
Whereas 38 million American jobs are supported by international trade;
Whereas the United States economy exports $2.2 trillion in goods and services 
        each year;
Whereas the United States is currently negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership 
        (TPP), a free trade agreement with 11 Pacific Rim countries, including 
        Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, 
        New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam;
Whereas the United States is currently negotiating the Transatlantic Trade and 
        Investment Partnership (T-TIP), a free trade agreement with 28 countries 
        of the European Union;
Whereas these trade agreements will have profoundly positive diplomatic impacts 
        that will serve to solidify United States relations with rising regional 
        economic powers; and
Whereas the United States should continue to expand its trading relationships to 
        create jobs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
completing free trade agreements with Pacific Rim countries and the 
European Union will promote economic development, create jobs, and 
solidify relations with trading partners.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022294EN.01002001.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — Qualcomm v Commission (Qualcomm — exclusivity payments)

(Case T-235/18) (1)

(Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - LTE chipsets market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - Exclusivity payments - Rights of the defence - Article 19 and Article 27(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Foreclosure effects)

(2022/C 294/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Qualcomm Inc. (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: M. Pinto de Lemos Fermiano Rato, M. Davilla and M. English, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, A. Dawes and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Qualcomm Inc., seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 240 final of 24 January 2018 relating to proceedings under Article 102 [TFEU] and Article 54 of the [EEA Agreement] (Case AT.40220 — Qualcomm (Exclusivity payments)), by which the European Commission found that Qualcomm had abused its dominant position from 25 February 2011 to 16 September 2016 (‘the period concerned’) and imposed on it a fine of EUR 997 439 000 (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside Commission Decision C(2018) 240 final of 24 January 2018 relating to proceedings under Article 102 [TFEU] and Article 54 of the [EEA Agreement] (Case AT.40220 — Qualcomm (Exclusivity payments)); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside Commission Decision C(2018) 240 final of 24 January 2018 relating to proceedings under Article 102 [TFEU] and Article 54 of the [EEA Agreement] (Case AT.40220 — Qualcomm (Exclusivity payments));

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
#### State v. Len

18200

2/09/95

Affirmed
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION 

SERVICE VETERINARY SERVICES

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS

1920 DAYTON AVENUE

AMES, IOWA 50010

CERTIFICATE OF LICENSE AND INSPECTION

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the Constitution of the United States of America empowers Congress to enact all laws which may be necessary and proper to

carry into effect the powers expressly granted to it. One of those laws, the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act (21 U.S.C. 151-159), authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture 

to license and inspect all veterinary biologics and diagnostics tests distributed in the United States. No worthless, dangerous, contaminated, or harmful 

products may be licensed or distributed.

I hereby certify that the following manufacturer of biologics or diagnostics has been licensed and inspected under the laws and regulations of the United States

of America.

1. NAME AND FULL MAILING ADDRESS OF THE MANUFACTURER 2. UNITED STATES VETERINARY LICENSE NUMBER 3. DATE ESTABLISHMENT

LICENSE WAS ISSUED

4. I hereby certify that the following veterinary biologic product or veterinary diagnostic product has been licensed and inspected (tested) according to the 

laws and regulations of the United States of America and is freely marketed at this time with the following restrictions:

5. TRUE NAME OF THE PRODUCT

6. MANUFACTURER'S TRADE NAME 7. USDA CODE 8. DATE PRODUCT LICENSE

WAS ISSUED

Signature of Authorized USDA Official

Title

Date 

Certificate Number

APHIS FORM 2047

APR 2015

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is 

estimated to average .33 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and 

completing and reviewing the collection of information.

OMB Approved

0579-0013

EXP: 02/2022
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

Nos. 99-2906 & 99-2907

________________

In re: Marion F. Pruss, also known

as Law Offices of Marion F. Pruss,

Debtor.

Marion F. Pruss,

Appellee,

v.

Richard J. Butler and 

Kathleen Laughlin, 

Appellants.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeals from the United States

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel 

for the Eighth Circuit. 

 [PUBLISHED]

________________

 Submitted: May 11, 2000

 Filed: October 10, 2000

________________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges. 

________________

PER CURIAM.
2

The court is informed that the underlying bankruptcy case has been dismissed

by order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska, thereby

making both of these appeals moot. 

Accordingly, It Is Ordered:

1. In appeal number 99-2906 brought by the Chapter 7 Trustee, Mr. Butler,

the appeal is dismissed as moot.

2. In appeal number 99-2907 brought by the Chapter 13 Trustee, Ms.

Laughlin, the appeal is dismissed as moot, and it is remanded to the

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with directions that the panel vacate its

opinion and judgment filed June 8, 1999. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements and Related Prospectuses (Forms S-3 No. 333-84402 and No. 333-42245; and Forms S-8 No. 333-95282, No. 333-3438, No. 333-26135, No. 333-44281, No. 333-50679,No. 333-76991, No. 333-33944, No. 333-56800, No. 333-84404, No. 333-101378 and No. 333-115494) of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. of our reports dated May 24, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.’s management assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofIntegrated Silicon Solution, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2006. 

 

San Jose, California 

May 24, 2007
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Back-Catering Frequently Asked

Questions

Last Modified: 

Print

How do I apply for a USDA-APHIS Regulated Garbage Compliance Agreement for Backcatering?

Those interested in applying for a regulated garbage compliance agreement for

back-catering, must submit an ink-signed cover letter (example cover letter)

along with additional information requested below, as applicable.   

APHIS Regulated Garbage Compliance Agreement Approval Template: aphis-rgca-approval-template-03-13-19.fm (usda.gov)

A Regulated Garbage Compliance Agreement is required for each individual

United States (US) Airport you’re flying into.  For example, if flying into Florida,

you must apply for each airport in Florida that you will enter (e.g. Miami,

Orlando, Tampa, etc.).  

What other documents are required for a USDA-APHIS Regulated Garbage Compliance

Agreement for Back-catering?

Along with the USDA-APHIS Regulated Compliance Agreement, you will need to

submit a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) detailing how you will adhere to your

obligations (Box D of the APHIS Regulated Garbage Compliance Agreement, page

8).  These include that the arriving aircraft must, at a minimum:

Depart the United States within 3 hours of the time of arrival

Depart from the US airport at which it arrived, directly to a foreign destination
Maintain unopened meals in tamper-proof (breakable seal) compartments

Maintain separation between unopened meals and regulated garbage at all

times

Ensure that meals are not removed from the conveyance for any reason

Maintain an APHIS Approved Regulated Garbage handler should ground time

exceeds 3 hours due to schedule delay or operational changes 

Do I need to use a US address for my company?

Yes, you must use a US address for the application.  

Which boxes do I need to check on the Compliance Agreement approval template for backcatering ONLY?

Check the Back-caterer box (page 5)

All sections of box A (pages 5-6)

Answer “Yes” to questions 1, 5(a,c,d), 11,12

Answer “Yes or No” to questions 2,3

Answer “N/A” to questions 4, 5(b), 6,7,8,9,10,13

All sections of box D (page 8)

All other boxes (B,C,E,F,G) should be checked N/A if applying only for backcatering. 

Does a new entity applying for back-catering need to have another company that already has a

back-catering Compliance Agreement as a back-up?

No 

Can a new entity applying for a Compliance Agreement for catering include back-catering in

their application?

Yes.

If existing Compliance Agreement holders want to add back-catering, is that done locally by

updating their SOP?

No, they must apply for back-catering.  Use the Regulated Garbage Mailbox to

initiate this process (ppq.ops.regulated.garbage@usda.gov).
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Interpore International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                      
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard L. Harrison                                              
|                      |  | Richard L. Harrison Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned executive officers of Ameriana Bancorp (the
Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Harry J. BaileyName:

Harry J. BaileyTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Bradley L. SmithName:

Bradley L. SmithTitle:

Senior Vice President and PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer




Date: March 25, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THIRTEEN AND 
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                         402,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,259)
<INVENTORY>                                    815,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,504,658
<PP&E>                                         443,018
<DEPRECIATION>                               (210,158)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,849,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,163,511
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           939
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,849,127
<SALES>                                      3,168,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,168,514
<CGS>                                        2,732,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,732,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               391,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,861
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 51 

Honoring the life, accomplishments, and legacy of Louis Zamperini and 

expressing condolences on his passing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself and Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life, accomplishments, and legacy of Louis 

Zamperini and expressing condolences on his passing. 

Whereas Louis Silvie ‘‘Lou’’ Zamperini was born on January 

26, 1917, to Anthony and Louise Zamperini, in Olean, 

New York; 

Whereas Louis Zamperini represented the United States in 

the 1936 Olympics in Berlin as a distance runner; 

Whereas Louis Zamperini graduated from the University of 

Southern California in 1940 and enlisted in the United 

States Army Air Corps in 1941, earning the rank of lieutenant; 

Whereas in May 1943, Louis Zamperini’s B–24 bomber malfunctioned and crashed during a search-and-rescue misVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:38 Jan 26, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR51.IH HR51

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 51 IH 

sion over the Pacific Ocean, leaving him and 2 other individuals stranded; 

Whereas Louis Zamperini survived for 47 days adrift in a life 

raft with Second Lieutenant Russell Phillips before being 

captured by Japanese forces and placed in a prisoner of 

war camp; 

Whereas for more than 2 years, during his imprisonment, 

Louis Zamperini endured brutal treatment and forced 

labor with courage and resilience; 

Whereas upon the conclusion of World War II, Louis 

Zamperini was released from the prisoner of war camp 

in September 1945; 

Whereas Louis Zamperini was promoted to captain and 

awarded multiple distinguishing military honors, including the Purple Heart, the Distinguished Flying Cross, 

and the Prisoner of War Medal; 

Whereas Louis Zamperini was given the honor of carrying 

the Olympic flame in 1984, 1996, and 1998; 

Whereas in the years after World War II, Louis Zamperini 

traveled as an inspirational public speaker, using his experiences to inspire a message of forgiveness; 

Whereas the airport in Torrance, California, was named 

‘‘Zamperini Field’’ in honor of Louis Zamperini; and 

Whereas Louis Zamperini leaves a legacy as a national hero 

and an inspiration to future generations: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the life, accomplishments, and legacy 

3 of Louis Zamperini; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 51 IH 

1 (2) extends heartfelt sympathies and condo2 lences to the family of Louis Zamperini. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23(a)**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-108771 on FormS-8 of First Financial Service Corporation of our reports dated March 3, 2006with respect to the consolidated financial statements of First FinancialService Corporation, as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the threeyears in the period ended December 31, 2005, and with respect to management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Financial Service Corporation.

 

 

 

CroweChizek and Company LLC

 

Louisville,Kentucky

March14, 2006

 

----
December 28, 1998

21006

#### Hawaiian Ins. & Guar. Co., Ltd. v. Febenito

Affirmed
----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Clayton W. Williams |
|-------------------------|
| Clayton W. Williams     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 7, 2009          |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Mel G. Riggs        |
| Mel G. Riggs            |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 7, 2009          |