alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Ogulei, David

From: U.S. EPA <usaepa@service.govdelivery.com>

Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:44 AM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: News Release: EPA seeks comments on draft permit renewal for Veolia hazardous waste 

incinerator

Media Contact: Phillippa Cannon, 312-353-6218, cannon.phillippa@epa.gov

For Immediate Release No. 14-OPA112 

EPA seeks comments on draft permit renewal for Veolia hazardous waste incinerator 

Chicago (Oct. 17, 2014) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is requesting public comment on the

Agency’s proposal to renew the operating permit for Veolia ES Technical Solutions’ hazardous waste 

incinerator in Sauget, Illinois. 

 

EPA initially issued a Clean Air Act permit for this facility on Sept. 12, 2008. Most requirements in the 

current permit would remain in place under the terms of the draft permit renewal. EPA is, however, 

proposing new “feedrate limits” for arsenic, lead mercury and other metals. Other proposed changes are: 

• Additional waste analysis procedures to ensure compliance with metal feedrate limits. 

• Temporary installation and operation of a monitoring system on each incinerator to ensure that feedrate 

limits are adequate to assure compliance with applicable emissions limits. 

• New requirements for emergency generators. 

The draft permit is available for review at: 

• Central Library, 1301 Olive St., St. Louis, Missouri. 

• East St. Louis Library, 5300 State St., East St. Louis, Illinois. 

• Cahokia Public Library, 140 Cahokia Park Drive, East St. Louis, Illinois. 

EPA has scheduled a public hearing on the draft permit renewal from 3 to 7 p.m. on Wednesday, Dec. 3 at 

SIU-Edwardsville, East St. Louis Higher Education Campus, Room 2002 Building D, 601 James R. 

Thompson Blvd. 

All written comments must be postmarked or emailed by Friday, Dec. 19. There are several ways to submit 

written comments: 

• Submit comments online at www.regulations.gov. Put Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280 in the 

search box. 
2

• Mail comments to George Czerniak, U.S. EPA Region 5 (A-18J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604.

• Email comments to John Mooney at mooney.john@epa.gov. 

More information about the draft permit renewal is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/region5/air/veoliasauget/index.html. 

 

You can unsubscribe or update your subscriptions or e-mail address at any time on your Subscriber 

Preferences Page. All you will need is your e-mail address. If you have any questions or problems, 

please e-mail subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com for assistance. 

This service is provided to you at no charge by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 

 

This email was sent to ogulei.david@epa.gov using GovDelivery, on behalf of: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW  Washington DC 20460  202-564-4355
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NCAH Portal Access Information

Last Modified: 

Print

Access to the NCAH Portal is strictly controlled through a combination of security

features. This page is designed to help you understand how to fulfill those

requirements.

CVB Notices 16-14 and 17-03 contain access requirements. 

NCAH Portal

Step-by-Step Guide to NCAH Portal Access 

(PDF, 553.4 KB)

An easy to follow guide for establishments that are licensed or have met the

eligibility requirements. 

Eligibility Requirements for New Establishments 

(PDF, 192.94 KB)

Pre-license establishments may or may not be eligible to access the NCAH Portal

depending on where they are in the licensing process.

eAuthentication Guidance Materials 
Individual user access to the NCAH Portal is controlled by eAuthentication (eAuth);

which is a separate USDA entity from the CVB. User access to CVB submissions on

the NCAH Portal require a verified identity eAuth account. Posted below are user

materials, FAQs and contact information for eAuth. If you have issues obtaining an

eAuth account or access after getting an account, contact eAuth as CVB cannot help

you with these.

USDA eAuthentication Home 

USDA eAuthentication Frequently Asked Questions 

Choose "Public Customer FAQs"

USDA eAuthentication Help
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11528 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN ALVAREZ

- MARTINEZ, also know n as Fernando Fernandez

- Alvarez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 107

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Alvarez

Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with A nders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alvarez

- Martine z h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 25, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11528 Document: 00514571515 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2018No. 17

- 11528

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-11528 Document: 00514571515 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2018
Exhibit 10.16


 


First AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
FIRST Amendment (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF SEPTEmBER 22,
2017 AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”) AND frost
gamma investments trust (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on September 22, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 until July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this First Amendment and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This First Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This First Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this First Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 


6. Counterparts.
This First Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 



    	 



    	 



     


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this First Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ James J. Martin
	 	 	 	
        Name:

        
	James J. Martin
	 	 	 	
        Title:

        
	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	FROST GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
        By:

        
	/s/ Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Name:	Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Title:	Trustee
#### The Bay Biscayne Company, a Corporation, *Appellant,*v. J. C. Baile, Abba Miller Otstott and E. W. Otstott, Her Husband, *Appellees.*

Decision Filed April 27, 1915.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and argument of *517counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered that the appellees do have and recover of and from the appellant their costs by them in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of $.........., all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.

Appeal from Circuit Court for Dade County; M. F. Horne, Judge.
atlw_ex1012.htm

EXHIBIT 10.12
 
 
 
	 
	1

	

	 


 
 
	 
	2

	

	 


 
 
	 
	3

	

	 


 
 
	 
	4

	

	 


 
 
 
	5
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

February 6, 2006 

 

The Board of Directors 

Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries 

 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20057, 333-20073, 333-31398, 333-76096,333-76654, 333-85518, 333-106270, 333-106271, 333-110706) pertaining to Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries’ Deferred Compensation Plan and Retirement Plan of our report dated February 6, 2006, relating to the unauditedcondensed consolidated interim financial statements of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 pertaining to the Quorum Health Group, Inc. Stock Option and
Restated Stock Purchase Plan (No. 33-38817), the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (No. 33-44474), the Directors Stock Option Plan (No. 33-46542), the
Directors Stock Option Plan (No. 33-89272), the Restated Stock Option Plan
(No. 33-54868), the Restated Stock Option Plan (No. 33-73288), the Restated
Stock Option Plan (No. 33-89274), the Non-qualified Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (No. 333-384) and the Restated Stock Option Plan (No. 333-24339), of
our report dated August 4, 1997, except for Note 12, as to which the date is 
August 19, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the
schedule of Quorum Health Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
the year ended June 30, 1997.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Nashville, Tennessee
September 26, 1997
19931

#### Diamond Syndicate Inc. v. Shapira

Affirmed
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49714-49715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17935]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 231 TAWS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 231 TAWS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 231 TAWS.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 20-23, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m. Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Friday.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036. Individuals wishing for WebEx/
Audio information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Morrison at rmorrison@rtca.org 
or (202) 330-0654 or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Eleventh Meeting Special Committee 
231 TAWS. The agenda will include the following:

Tuesday, September 20, 2016--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

(1) Welcome/Introduction
(2) Administrative Remarks
(3) Agenda Review
(4) Summary of Pre-FRAC comments received on Strawman
(5) Other Business
(6) Date and Place of Next Meeting

Wednesday, Thursday, September 21st, 22nd--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Friday, September 23rd--9:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.

Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons

[[Page 49715]]

wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the 
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members 
of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any 
time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 25, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-17935 Filed 7-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
10600

#### State v. Swoish

Dismissed
#### Bruce HAMBY, Appellant (Defendant below), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff below). Robert Edward JONES, Appellant (Defendant below), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

Nos. 4654, 4664.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Feb. 17, 1977.

*1389Kermit C. Brown, of MacPherson & Golden, Rawlins, for appellants.

V. Frank Mendicino, Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Stack, Deputy Atty. Gen., Crim. Div., Cheyenne, and Richard Barrett and Jeffrey A. King, Prosecution Assts., Laramie, for appellee.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLIN-TOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants-defendants were punished administratively for escaping from the Wyoming State Penitentiary by loss of “good time” previously granted as a matter of grace under § 7-325(c), W.S.1957, 1975 Cum.Supp., and were subsequently convicted in the district court of, and sentenced for, the crime of escape from a penal institution, arising from the same factual circumstances, in violation of § 6-167, W.S. 1957, 1975 Cum.Supp. Since the cases raise the same issue pertaining to double jeopardy, they have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal.

We hold, as have innumerable jurisdictions, that a criminal prosecution for prison escape is not barred by a plea of former jeopardy based on disciplinary punishment previously imposed by prison authorities for the same escape; e. g., *Alex v. State,*484 P.2d 677 (Alaska 1971); *Collins v. State,*215 Kan. 489, 524 P.2d 715 (1974); *State v. Millican,*84 N.M. 256, 501 P.2d 1076 (1972); *Hutchison v. United States,*450 F.2d 930 (10th Cir. 1971); and *United States v. Hedges,*458 F.2d 188 (10th Cir. 1972).

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6751

JERMAINE DEANDREA WALKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-82-2)

Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: September 2, 2005

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Deandrea Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Deandrea Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Walker v. United States, No. CA-05-82-2 (E.D.

Va. filed Mar. 31, 2005 & entered Apr. 1, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Int'l Sav. & Loan, Ltd. v. Thames

24004

02/08/2002

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.11


 


Second AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
Second Amendment (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF OCTOBER 27,
2015 AND AMENDED ON JULY 20, 2017 (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”)
AND JANE HSIAO (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT,
AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on October 27, 2015; and


 


WHEREAS, on July
20, 2017, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 until July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Second Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Second Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


6. Counterparts. This Second Amendment
may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in any number of counterparts,
each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart hereof shall have been
signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Second Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Name:	James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Jane Hsiao, Ph.D.	 	 	 
	Name:	Jane Hsiao, Ph.D.
<PAGE>

                   CENTENNIAL CELLULAR CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                              EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-Q

                   For the Three Months Ended August 31, 1996

                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                  (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                    -------------------------------
                                                      August 31,         August 31,
                                                        1996                1995
                                                    ------------       ------------
                                                                        (Unaudited)
<S>                                                 <C>                <C>
Primary fully diluted:

Net Loss                                            $     (6,107)      $     (3,418)
Accretion in liquidation value of preferred stock         (3,610)            (3,291)
                                                    ------------       ------------
Loss applicable to common shares                    $     (9,717)      $     (6,709)

Average number of common shares and common
      share equivalents outstanding

         Average number of common shares
         outstanding during this period               26,932,000         26,296,240
         Add common share equivalents - Options
         to purchase common shares - net                 379,264            513,760
                                                    ------------       ------------
Average number of common shares and common
      share equivalents outstanding                   27,311,264 (A)     26,810,000 (A)
                                                    ============       ============

Loss per common share                               $       (.36)(A)   $       (.25)(A)
                                                    ============       ============

</TABLE>

(A)      In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15, the
         inclusioin of common share equiv computation of earnings per share need
         not be considered if the reduction of earnings per share is or the
         effect is anti-dilutive. Therefore, loss per common share equivalents
         as shown on the Conso Statements of Operations for the periods
         presented do not include certain common share equivalents is
         anti-dilutive. However, the consolidated financial statements for the
         three month periods ended and August 31, 1995 do include the effect, on
         a retroactive basis of 0 and 397,760, respectively, o shares issued
         prior to the Company's initial offering.




<PAGE>