alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from InfoNow's
Quarterly  report to stockholders  for the nine months ended September 30, 1998,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1968
<PP&E>                                            1578
<DEPRECIATION>                                     835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                        1499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2735
<SALES>                                           1641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1641
<CGS>                                             1282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (10)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        


</TABLE>
#### J. Sullivan *&*Sons Mfg. Corp., Respondent, *v.*Trade Bank & Trust Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April 2, 1959.

*893*Gettinger & Gettinger (Samuel W. Sherman*and *Luba Wang*of counsel), for appellant.

*Joseph J. Einhorn*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendant has waived its appeal insofar as the Statute of Frauds defense is concerned, so that the only-issue is whether the motion should have been granted as to the second affirmative defense which purports to set up an alleged election of remedies by the plaintiff.

The defendant did not learn of the facts of the proposed second defense until six months after the commencement of the action and after the interposition of the original answer. While the court will not attempt to determine the issues thus presented, it is clear at least that there is merit to the proposed amendment. In the circumstances, the court below should have granted permission to serve the amended and supplemental answer. The power to permit amendment of pleadings is to be exercised liberally in the furtherance of justice so that one may have an opportunity to have determined at the trial every question affecting his interest involved in the subject matter of the litigation. *(Bendan Holding Corp.*v. *Rodner,*245 App. Div. 723; *Gedney*v. *Diorio,*190 App. Div. 85; *Washington Life Ins. Co.*v. *Scott,*119 App. Div. 847.)

The order so far as appealed from should be modified, with $10 costs and disbursements to the defendant, and motion granted permitting defendant to serve an amended and supplemental answer containing the second distinct and affirmative defense within 10 days after service of copy of order entered hereon.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Stetjer and Tilzer, JJ.

Order modified, etc.
Exhibit
32.1










Section
906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer







I, Joel
P. Moskowitz, Chief Executive Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:







(1)
    the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and






(2)     the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
      February 23, 2010/s/ Joel P. MoskowitzJoel
      P. MoskowitzChief
      Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
MICROTEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                       186
<INVENTORY>                                      3,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,698
<PP&E>                                           2,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,000
<BONDS>                                             36
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,319
<SALES>                                         16,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,303
<CGS>                                           10,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (175)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (85)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,597)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.65)
        

</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply627Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  John DeWitt Wi... (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 23, 2020 - 2:39pmThank you for the enlightening and animated biography of Col. DeWitt.  He is my 5 times great-grandfather too and I have been told a great many tales of family lore about his life but know that often those tales tend to get blown up and out of proportion.  I'm relieved to learn while reading your article that those modest Dutch genes have held strong in my branch as the tales were less detailed but didn't contain embellishments either.  I can't say thank you enough!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth D. Walter,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.







                                                         /s/Kenneth D. Walter
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
# C_2020103EN.01002002.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kanyama v Council

(Case T-167/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Right to respect for private and family life - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality)

(2020/C 103/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Célestin Kanyama to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Célestin Kanyama to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
# C_2019139EN.01005201.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Lotte v EUIPO — Générale Biscuit-Glico France (PEPERO original)

(Case T-459/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark PEPERO original - Earlier national three-dimensional mark - Shape of an oblong biscuit partially covered with chocolate - Declaration of invalidity - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Earlier mark consisting of the shape of the product - Use as a trade mark - No alteration of distinctive character)

(2019/C 139/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Lotte Corp. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: G. Ringeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Générale Biscuit-Glico France (Clamart, France) (represented by: A. Lecomte, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 May 2018 (Case R 913/2017-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Générale Biscuit-Glico France and Lotte.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lotte Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lotte Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



GENAERA CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Skolas, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John A. Skolas                                  
|John A. Skolas                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2004
Order No. 97-42

18861

April 28, 1997

#### Tokyo Investment Services, Inc. v. Toto Sangyo Co., Ltd.

Affirmed
#### Doe Children, In re

23923

03/08/2002

Affirmed
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 5, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00066 - CR EX PARTE RODNEY COLL INS SMITH On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W18 - 00143 - V (A) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell Rodney Collins Smith has filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal an adverse decis ion by the court of criminal appeals on his application for writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Our records show appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. On direct appeal, t he Court modified and affirmed the trial court’ s judgment. See Smith v. State , No. 05

- 18

- 00491

- CR, 2019 WL 1615353, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Apr. 15, 2019, pet. ref’d). In his notice of appeal, appellant states he is appealing a November 4, 2020 decision denying relief on his wr it application docketed as cause number W18

- 00143

- V(A) and WR

- 91,767

- 01. Enclosed with the notice of appeal is a postcard from the court of cr iminal appeals indicating it had, on– 2

–

November 4, 2020, denied without written order appellant’s writ application d ocketed as trial court no. W18

- 00143

- V(A) and as writ no. WR

- 91,767

- 01. The clerk’s record has been filed and it confirms appellant is attempting to appeal an adverse decision of the court of criminal appeals. After a final felony conviction, the court of criminal appeals has exclusive authority to grant post

- conviction habeas relief. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . art. 11.07, § 5 ; Bd
. of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. The Eighth Court of Appeals , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceedi ng) (per curiam)
. A court of appeals may only review appeals when authorized by law. See Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694, 696

– 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Article 11.07 does not authorize this Court to review the court of criminal appeals’ determinations on an article 11.07 writ application. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . art. 11.07, § § 3, 5; Keene , 910 S.W.2d at 483; In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (per curiam)
. Because we have no jurisdict ion to review the denial of appellant’s writ application , we dismiss the appeal.

Do Not Publish T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2 (b) 210066F.U05 /Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT EX PARTE RODNEY COLLINS SMITH No. 05

- 21

- 00066

- CR On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W18

- 00143

- V(A). Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. Justices Molberg and Reichek participating. Based on the Court’ s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED
. Judgment entered this 5th day of February, 2021.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to
the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company as of December 31, 2003 and for the period then ended.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/  GLADE M. KNIGHT                   
|                                       
|Glade M. Knight Chief Executive Officer



March 12, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                        MATTHEWS STUDIO EQUIPMENT GROUP


Hollywood Rental Company, LLC
-----------------------------
State of Formation:  Delaware
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Hollywood Rental Company, LLC
     Hollywood Rental Company

Matthews Acceptance Corporation
-------------------------------
State of Incorporation:  California
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Matthews Acceptance Corporation
     MAC

Matthews Studio Electronics, Inc.
---------------------------------
State of Incorporation:  California
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Matthews Studio Electronics, Inc.
     Matthews Studio Electronics

Duke City Video, Inc.
---------------------
State of Incorporation:  New Mexico
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Duke City Video, Inc.
     DCDUBS
     Duke City Dallas
     Duke City Studios
     Duke City West

Matthews Studio Group Centers, Inc.
-----------------------------------
State of Incorporation:  California
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Matthews Studio Group Centers, Inc.
     Matthews Studio Group Centers - Nevada, Inc.
     Matthews Studio Group Centers - Tennessee, Inc.

<PAGE>
 
Matthews Studio Sales, Inc.
---------------------------
State of Incorporation:  California
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Matthews Studio Sales, Inc.
     ESS
     ESS International
     Expendable Supply Store

HDI Holdings, Inc.
------------------
State of Incorporation:  Kentucky
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     HDI Holdings, Inc.
     HDI

Four Star Lighting, Inc.
------------------------
State of Incorporation:  New York
Names Under Which Subsidiary Conducts Business:
     Four Star Lighting, Inc.
     Four Star Stage
     Lighting, Inc.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50994 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ANDY THOMAS SCHUMAN

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:03

- CR

- 99

- 2

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Andy Schuman has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Schuman h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 30, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50994 Document: 00515471549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2020No. 19

- 50994

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-50994 Document: 00515471549 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
November 7, 1997

17217

#### Jackson v. Conner

Affirmed
#### State v. Taylor

22292

09/22/2000

Reversed