alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         $1,650,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,707,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,647,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51,715,000
<PP&E>                                         31,596,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                160,305,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          54,995,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       74,026,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,538,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  160,305,000
<SALES>                                        37,806,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,806,000
<CGS>                                          30,581,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30,581,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,688,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                855,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   869,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      712,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               157,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (26,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      101,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .01
        


</TABLE>
# C_2020209EN.01002401.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — Tecnodidattica v EUIPO (Shape of bases for globes and lamps)

(Case T-752/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of bases for globes and lamps - Absolute ground for refusal - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No decorative or imaginative elements playing an important or essential role)

(2020/C 209/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Tecnodidattica SpA (San Colombano Certenoli, Italy) (represented by: S. Corona and F. Corona, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 October 2018 (Case R 76/2017-2), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of bases for globes and lamps as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tecnodidattica SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tecnodidattica SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
47 P.3d 762

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

April 11, 2002

23530

#### State v. Stephen

Affirmed
# C_2018436EN.01002901.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 24 September 2018 — UTEP 2006. SRL v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály

(Case C-600/18)

(2018/C 436/40)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UTEP 2006. SRL

Defendant: Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály

Question referred

Should [Article] 92 TFEU be interpreted as precluding an interpretation of Article 12/A of the a kis- és középvállalkozásokról, fejlődésük támogatásáról szóló 2004. [évi] XXXIV. törvény (Law No XXXIV of 2004 on small and medium-sized enterprises and aid for their development; ‘KKV Law’) and the practice of the authorities followed in this respect, according to which Article 12/A of the KKV Law cannot be applied to enterprises (legal entities) that are not registered in Hungary, but in another Member State, but that are otherwise in line with the concept of small and medium-sized enterprise laid down by that Law?

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10Q PERIOD END SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000880431
<NAME> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,366
<SECURITIES>                                    38,627
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,468
<PP&E>                                           5,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,586)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.47)
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed July 14, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1672

Lower Tribunal No. 18-24655

________________

Cordis Corporation,

Appellant,

vs.

Nicole Williams, etc., 

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for MiamiDade County, David C. Miller, Judge.

Crowell & Moring LLP, and Vincent J. Galluzzo (Washington, D.C.);

and Wallen Kelley, and John D. Golden, for appellant.

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and Joseph R. 

Johnson (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before HENDON, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) appeals from a non-final order denying 

its motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non-conveniens. We affirm. 

The plaintiff, Nicole Williams, individually, and as personal 

representative of the Estate of Charles Windell Williams, Jr., and as 

Guardian for Kaleb J. Williams and Kailyn G. Williams, brought a product 

liability suit against Cordis, alleging that defects in the Cordis TrapEase 

Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filter (“Cordis IVC Filter”) caused the 

deceased’s injuries and death. The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the 

state of Maryland. Cordis is a Florida corporation and maintains an office in 

Miami Lakes, Florida. Cordis’s Miami Lakes office is the central location for 

handling product complaints, quality control, risk management, training, 

and regulatory compliance involving the Cordis IVC Filter. 

Following a hearing, the trial court denied Cordis’s motion to dismiss 

on the ground of forum non conveniens. Based on our review of the record, 

including the trial court’s order addressing each of the forum non 

conveniens factors,1 we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its 

discretion in denying the motion. As such, we affirm the order under review. 

1 The analysis for forum non conveniens is well established in Florida law. 

See Cortez v. Palace Resorts, 123 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 2013); Kinney Sys., 

Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. Co., 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1996); Abeid-Saba v. Carnival 

Corp., 184 So. 3d 593, 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Telemundo Network Grp., 

LLC v. Azteca Int'l Corp., 957 So. 2d 705, 709 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Fla. R. 

Civ. P. 1.061(a). 
3

Aerolineas Argentinas, S.A. v. Gimenez, 807 So. 2d 111, 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2002) (stating that decision to grant or deny a forum non conveniens

motion for dismissal rests in the sound discretion of the trial court). 

Affirmed.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection 

of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0013. The time 

required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 0.15 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching 

existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

OMB Approved

0579-0013 

EXP: 02/2022

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE

VETERINARY SERVICES

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS (CVB)

INSPECTION AND COMPLIANCE FACILITY

DOCUMENT SUBMISSION WORKSHEET

All buildings, appurtenances, and equipment used in the preparation of biological products shall be in compliance with Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 108, Facility

Requirements for Licensed Establishments. Completion of this worksheet facilitates review of facility documents submitted to CVB Inspection and Compliance.

1. USDA

VETERINARY BIOLOGICS

ESTABLISHMENT

NUMBER

2. ESTABLISHMENT

SITE ADDRESS

RELATED TO

SUBMISSION

A. ESTABLISHMENT NAME B. ADDRESS

C. CITY D. STATE E. COUNTRY F. ZIP CODE

3. DATE SUBMITTED

4. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED

A. TYPE OF DOCUMENT B. COMMENTS CVB USE 

ONLY

5. MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT TYPE (not listed above)

6. COMMENTS

(Include pertinent information but be succinct,

maximum 200 characters. Do not repeat 

information found elsewhere on this form.)

7. SUBMITTER SIGNATURE

(or liaison/alternate liaison)

A. SIGNATURE B. DATE

FOR CVB USE ONLY

8. MAIL LOG NUMBER

9. CVB ACTION A. DOCUMENTS FILED B. DOCUMENTS FILED, 

REVISIONS REQUESTED C. DOCUMENTS RETURNED

10. APHIS REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE A. SIGNATURE B. DATE

APHIS FORM 2009

AUG 2017
18828

#### State v. Kaihewalu

February 14, 1997

Order No. 97-13

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part
#### Vega v. Vega

20531

6/22/98

Vacated & Remanded
FY24 Activity Report

As of 2023-12-04 11:27:53 Eastern Standard Time/EST

Event Name State Start Date (USDA) End Date (USDA) HIO

Entries Event 

Total

Classes Event 

Total

Entries 

Inspected by 

USDA

Total Horses 

Radiographed

Total Horses 

Swabbed

Total Horses

Iris Imaged

United Walking Horse Fall Finale Mississippi (MS) 11/17/2023 11/18/2023 S.H.O.W., Inc. 217 45 60 0 0 11

PPWHANC Summer Fun Show North Carolina (NC) 11/4/2023 11/4/2023

Walking Horse Owners’ 

Association, Inc. 188 48 22 0 0 0

Midwest Walking Horse Trainer Association Show Missouri (MO) 11/4/2023 11/4/2023

Heart of America Walking 

Horse Association 79 26 18 0 0 10

Celebration Fall Classic Horse Show Tennessee (TN) 11/3/2023 11/4/2023 S.H.O.W., Inc. 304 41 106 30 30 0

Palmetto Saddle Club Horse Show South Carolina (SC) 10/28/2023 10/28/2023 American Horse Services 79 30 19 0 0 0

56th Annual Ohio Valley Walking Horse Association 

Horse Show Kentucky (KY) 10/28/2023 10/28/2023 KY-HIO, LLC 78 22 25 8 20 0

WHOA Show Series Tennessee (TN) 10/21/2023 10/21/2023

Walking Horse Owners’ 

Association, Inc. 117 41 43 0 0 0

ETWHA Fall Classic Horse Show Tennessee (TN) 10/20/2023 10/21/2023 American Horse Services 258 46 42 13 14 0

Racking Horse Breeders Association of America World 

Celebration Tennessee (TN) 10/12/2023 10/14/2023 S.H.O.W., Inc. 286 50 80 33 38 17

ANWARC Gaited Show Arkansas (AR) 10/7/2023 10/7/2023

Missouri Fox Trotting Horse 

Breed Association 34 20 12 2 0 0

53rd Annual North Carolina Championship Walking Horse 

Show North Carolina (NC) 10/6/2023 10/7/2023 S.H.O.W., Inc. 283 58 66 0 25 7

Total 1,923 427 493 86 127 45

Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
of  Form 10-Q for the period ending May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ilia Lekach, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my  knowledge:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                                          By:      /s/ Ilia Lekach
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Ilia Lekach
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   June 13, 2003


                                       18


<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
of  Form 10-Q for the period ending May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. Mark Young, Chief
Financial  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my  knowledge:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

                                              By:      /s/ A. Mark Young
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       A. Mark Young
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       June 13, 2003


                                       19

<PAGE>
# C_2019025EN.01002202.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 25 October 2018 — Orde van Vlaamse balies, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone v Ministerraad

(Case C-667/18)

(2019/C 25/27)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Grondwettelijk Hof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Orde van Vlaamse balies, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone

Defendant: Ministerraad

Question referred

Should the term ‘proceedings’ in Article 201(1)(a) of Directive 2009/138/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance be interpreted as including extrajudicial and judicial mediation proceedings, as provided for in Articles 1723/1 to 1737 of the Belgian Gerechtelijk Wetboek (Judicial Code)?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 335, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,184)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,607
<PP&E>                                         155,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                (71,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,198
<BONDS>                                          1,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           295
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,210
<SALES>                                         70,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,575
<CGS>                                           45,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,294
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (116)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20<F1>
<FN>
<F1>On December 2, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a 2-for-1
stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend. The distribution was made
on December 29, 1998 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
December 8, 1998. Financial Data Schedules reported prior to the stock split
have not been restated to reflect this stock split.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Williams v. Pia

16586

10/17/94

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2021053EN.01003202.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — American Airlines v Commission

(Case T-430/18) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - Air transport market - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Commitments - Decision granting Grandfathering rights - Error of law - Concept of appropriate use)

(2021/C 53/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: American Airlines, Inc. (Fort Worth, Texas, United States) (represented by: J.-P. Poitras, Solicitor, J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Wileur, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Franchoo, H. Leupold and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware (United States) (represented by: M. Demetriou, QC, C. Angeli and I. Giles, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 2788 final of 30 April 2018 granting Grandfathering rights to Delta Air Lines (Case M.6607 — US Airways/American Airlines).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders American Airlines, Inc. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders American Airlines, Inc. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Delta Air Lines, Inc. to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Delta Air Lines, Inc. to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.

---