alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Emerald ash Borer attAcks tHe funNies!

INVADE 1 MIDDLE 

SCHOOL

HUNGRY PESTS

EXCERPTS FROM HUNGRY PESTS SERIES IN MARK TRAIL COMICS WWW.HUNGRYPESTS.COM

MARK TRAIL

The Mark Trail comic strip highlighted the Emerald Ash Borer (or EAB) problem in the dailies of a seven-week storyline about the invasive beetle that 

is destroying our precious ash trees. Special thanks to Mark Trail via @ComicsKingdom and King Features Syndicate, a unit of Hearst Corporation, 

for permission to reprint excerpts from the story. The Mark Trail comic strip is a fun way to raise awareness about the EAB and many other pests that 

harm our water, woods, and wildlife. You can stop the beetle! EAB larvae can survive hidden in the bark of firewood. Don’t move firewood. 
INVADE 2 MIDDLE 

SCHOOL

HUNGRY PESTS

EXCERPTS FROM HUNGRY PESTS SERIES IN MARK TRAIL COMICS WWW.HUNGRYPESTS.COM

(CONTINUED)

Reprinted by special permission of King Features Syndicate
CSB BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

President and Chief Executive Officer



I, John J. Limbert, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date:  August 7, 2003 | /s/ JOHN J. LIMBERT                                  
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                      | John J. Limbert
President and
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:   May 14, 2008
    By:

/s/
James M. VanderhiderJames M. Vanderhider, President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Director
#### State v. Ward

23050

01/05/2001

Affirmed
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dendrite International,Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),John E. Bailye, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen E.Donovan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| JOHN E. BAILYE      |                                              |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Name:               | John E. Bailye                                    |
| Title:              | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               | November 14, 2003                                 |
|                |                                              |
|                |                                              |
| KATHLEEN E. DONOVAN |                                              |
| Name:               | Kathleen E. Donovan                               |
| Title:              | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:               | November 14, 2003                                 |
|                     |                                                   |  |  |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00922

- CR

Michele Valdez VALDEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR0909

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED January 16, 2019.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
20676

#### Feltman v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of EMRISE Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Vice President Finance and Administration of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/CARMINE T. OLIVACarmine T. Oliva
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/D. JOHN DONOVAND. John Donovan
Vice President Finance and Administration (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of U.S. Home & Garden Inc. (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Kassel, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Robert Kassel
                                                     -----------------
                                                     Robert Kassel
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November 14, 2002
IV 

House Calendar No. 109 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 701 

[Report No. 114–530] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4498) to clarify the definition 

of general solicitation under Federal securities law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2016 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4498) to clarify 

the definition of general solicitation under Federal securities law. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 4498) to clarify the definition of general solicitation under 

4 Federal securities law. All points of order against consid5 eration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered 

6 as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 

7 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 701 RH 

1 ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

2 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

3 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

4 ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

5 Services; (2) the amendment printed in the report of the 

6 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if of7 fered by the Member designated in the report, which shall 

8 be in order without intervention of any point of order, 

9 shall be considered as read, shall be separately debatable 

10 for the time specified in the report equally divided and 

11 controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall 

12 not be subject to a demand for a division of the question; 

13 and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instruc14 tions. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 109 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 701 

[Report No. 114–530] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4498) 

under Federal securities law. to clarify the definition of general solicitation 

APRIL 26, 2016 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Hamamoto Corp. v. Int'l Savings & Loan Ass'n

23295

06/14/2002

Affirmed/Reversed in part
Termine a Luta contra o Tremor Epizoótico! 

As instalações de abate que salvam cabeças de 

ovinos e caprinos adultos podem ser pagas. 

Porquê o Tremor Epizoótico? Como Ajudar?

O Tremor Epizoótico mata ovinos e 

caprinos, limitando as exportações. 

A indústria precisa da sua ajuda para 

encontrar o último caso de tremor 

epizoótico nos E.U.A e para mostrar 

quando os E.U.A estarão livres de tremor 

epizoótico. 

1. Estabelecer um acordo de amostragem 

2. Salvar cabeças de ovinos e caprinos 

adultos 

3. Armazenar cabeças e TODA a 

identifcação (como marcas 

auriculares) em refrigeração 

*Os animais devem ter pelo 

 menos 18 meses de idade. 

$

Contacto 

O USDA é um provedor, empregador, credor de oportunidades iguais. Emitido Em Maio De 2023
# P--p'l!~ S10-100331-004 CONTROL NO Harrisburg InternationalAirport

Timothy J. Edwards Executive Director

March 15,2010
The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Ul

.Washington,DC 2059.0 Dear SecretaryLaHood: Onbehalfofthe SusquehannaArea Regional Airport Authority, I am writing to express our strong support for the Delta Air Lines application for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have a strong trade and market presence with Japan. With five daily flights betweenMDT and Detroit Metro Airport, ourbusinesses would benefit from convenient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport. Our community, too, would enjoy the enhanced relationship building benefitthat would result should this application be granted. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is would clearly benefit our business travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request.

"""Tn" J**~** 

### Edwards, Executive Director

One Terminal Drive - Suite 300 - Middletown, PA 17057 (717) 948-3900 - Fax (717) 9484636 - 1-888-HIAJETS

.. JlU""/



### TIy- -=:;iiiI!"; 

### com
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 3 OF THE
                           BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
                     1999 CHANGE IN CONTROL PROTECTION PLAN
                                FOR KEY EMPLOYEES
                        AMENDED EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 2004

      The Belden & Blake Corporation 1999 Change in Control Protection Plan for
Key Employees, originally effective August 12, 1999, is hereby amended,
effective as of April 20, 2004, by adding a new paragraph at the end of Section
3.1 to read as follows:

      Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, an Employee otherwise
meeting the Eligibility criteria shall not be eligible for severance benefits
hereunder if the Employee's termination is the result of the sale of less than
seventy-five (75%) percent of the Company's assets, if such Employee is offered
what is in the sole opinion of the Company a comparable position with the buyer
of the assets as further defined in the Belden & Blake Corporation 1999
Severance Pay Plan, Amendment 2 effective September 1, 2002.

      All other aspects of the Plan remain unchanged and are reaffirmed.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Belden & Blake Corporation has caused this amendment
to the Plan to be executed as of the 20th day of April 2004.

ATTEST:                                 BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION

/s/ Duane D. Clark                      By: /s/ John L. Schwager
-----------------------                 --------------------------------------
Duane D. Clark                          John L. Schwager
Secretary                               President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Cincinnati Auto Parts Co., Appellee, *v.*Hawke et al; Brewer, Appellant.

(No. 31934

Decided January 11, 1950.)

*Messrs. Goivell & Fletcher,*for appellee.

*Mr. George 8. Hawke,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Treatment Monitoring Fee

Last Modified: 

Print

The AQI program performs or monitors the fumigation or cold treatment of

consignments of articles that require treatment upon arrival from a place outside the

customs territory of the United States, either as a condition of entry or as a remedial

measure ordered after inspection. Treatment monitoring fee regulations are listed in

7 CFR 354.3(h).

The Cost and What It Covers

The current treatment monitoring fee is $237.00 per treatment (see 7 CFR 354.3(h)

). This fee covers the direct and indirect costs to conduct the treatment, monitor the

treatment, or both. Treatments monitored on overtime will incur both the treatment

monitoring fee and the reimbursable overtime fee.

Paying the Fee

When APHIS is not providing the AQI treatment and collecting the associated fee, the

treatment provider performing the treatment is responsible for collecting and

remitting the fees to APHIS, as described in 7 CFR 354.3(h). A Remittance Worksheet

(277.65 KB) is available to assist with this process.
How To Pay the Treatment Monitoring User Fee infographic (97.23 KB)

How To Set Up a Payment Account

To set up a payment account with APHIS’ Financial Management Division, send a

completed New Account Packet – Treatment (483.47 KB) to the location indicated on

the worksheet.

Companies need a separate APHIS account for each user fee type, such as

international air passenger, treatment monitoring, reimbursable overtime, and other

types.

Reimbursable Overtime Services

Customers may request and receive AQI services associated with activities typically

covered by an AQI user fee outside the normal tour of duty of the employee(s)

providing the requested service. In such cases, overtime charges may be assessed

as outlined in 7 CFR 354.1.

APHIS Reimbursable Overtime Services

Refer to the APHIS Reimbursable Overtime Services web page for additional

information including how to pay the reimbursable overtime fee.

CBP Reimbursable Overtime Services

Any requests for agriculture reimbursable overtime will be made in accordance with

CBP port policy. Please contact your local CBP Port of Entry.

Can companies remit payments more frequently than specified in the Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR)?

To minimize administrative costs, please remit payments as outlined in 7 CFR

354.3(h)

Are companies required to open a separate account at their bank to handle USDA fee

collections?
No. Companies must account for user fee collections separately from their other

business within their own accounting methods and systems.
October 26, 2000

22850

#### State v. Barnett

Affirmed
#### Anthony TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond IGLECIA, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-6544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.

Decided Oct. 6, 2005.

Anthony Turner, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Basham, Ted G. Yoakam, Allison W. Anders, McKenry, Dancigers, Warner, Dawson & Lake, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Turner appeals the magistrate judge’s order* granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and related state law claims alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and medical malpractice. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Turner v. Iglecia,*No. CA-00-917-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
#### Cupp v. Namuo

17430

10/11/94

Affirmed
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00507
- CR

Juan Deltoro, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 18
- 204174 , THE HONORABLE BRAD URRUTIA, JUDGE PRES IDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for
pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with thi s Court. Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial
court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide2

written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which th e appellate record was provided, on or before April 20, 2020

. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on April 10, 2020

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith Do Not Publish