alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

APHIS Issues Regulatory Status

Review Responses

Print

Inari Agriculture, Inc., modified corn for higher yield.

Greenlab, Inc., modified corn to produce a protein sweetener called brazzein in

seeds and for herbicide resistance. 

APHIS found these modified plants were unlikely to pose an increased plant pest risk

compared to other cultivated plants. As a result, they are not subject to regulation

under 7 CFR part 340. From a plant pest risk perspective, these modified plants may

be safely grown and bred in the United States. 

You can view these RSR requests and APHIS’ responses on the APHIS website.
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. George KELLY, Defendant.

Criminal No. 10-0293 (PLF)

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Signed 09/29/2017

*93Thomas Todd Heslep, Thomas Heslep, Attorney At Law, Washington, DC, Joanne Roney Hepworth, Law Office óf Joanne Roney Hepworth, PawPaw, WV, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

The United States Probation Office filed-a Probation Petition [Dkt. 41] on June 9, 2017, requesting that defendant George Kelly’s conditions of supervised release by modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention and to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses to his employer. The undersigned referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather, who held a hearing on August 24, 2017.

After consideration of the arguments and evidence presented by the parties and the Probation Office, Magistrate Judge Meriweather issued a Report and Recomr mendation [Dkt. 48] on September 11, 2017. She recommends that the Court grant the request to modify Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to include a thirty-day term of home detention, as a reasonable response to non-compliant behavior. Mr. Kelly does pot oppose this recommendation. Magistrate Judge Meri-weather further recommends that..the Court deny the request to modify ,Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to require third-party risk notification to his employer, as this, requested condition is not reasonably, necessary to protect the public. Counsel- for both parties have represented to the Court, that they do not object to these recommendations. Accordingly, upon consideration of . the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the parties’ decisions not to object thereto, itls hereby

ORDERED that the recommendations made by Magistrate Judge Meriweather in the Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s conditions of release to include a thirty-day term of home detention is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s conditions of release to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses to his employer is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Kelly’s conditions of supervised release' are modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention.

SO ORDERED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131780 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131780 COA: 260187 Oakland CC: 03-192439-FC JEFFREY NORMAN MacINTOSH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
# C_2019187EN.01007901.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/79

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 April 2019 — Medrobotics v EUIPO (See More. Reach More. Treat More.)

(Case T-555/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark See More. Reach More. Treat More. - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 187/85)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Medrobotics Corp. (Rayanham, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: B. Bittner and U. Heinrich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2018 (Case R 463/2018-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign See More. Reach More. Treat More. as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Medrobotics Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Medrobotics Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
# C_2020036EN.01002901.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Montanari v EEAS

(Case T-692/18) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Ad hoc inspection report - Refusal of access - Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual - Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 - Article 8(b) of Regulation No 45/2001 - Transfer of personal data - Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of investigations - Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Obligation to state reasons)

(2020/C 36/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marco Montanari (Reggio Emilia, Italy) (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, R. Spac and E. Orgován, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of EEAS of 24 October 2018 by which EEAS refused to grant the applicant access to the report of 29 July 2017 drawn up by A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 24 October 2018 by which the European External Action Service (EEAS) rejected the confirmatory application for access to documents made by Mr Marco Montanari on 13 September 2018; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 24 October 2018 by which the European External Action Service (EEAS) rejected the confirmatory application for access to documents made by Mr Marco Montanari on 13 September 2018;

| 2. | Orders EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EEAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.

---
April 21, 2008

28009

#### State v. Emch

Vacated and Remanded
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ MICHAEL L. BENNETT

Michael L. BennettChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: April 24, 2009
----

----

**EXHIBIT 22**

**SUBSIDIARIES          OF REGISTRANT**

|   | **1.** | Fonix/AcuVoice,                    Inc., a Utah corporation, wholly owned by                    Fonix |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **2.** | Fonix/Papyrus                    Corporation, a Utah corporation, wholly owned by                    Fonix |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **3.** | Fonix                    UK Ltd., a limited company organized under the laws of the United                    Kingdom,                    wholly owned by Fonix |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **4.** | Fonix                    Sales, Korea Group, Ltd., a Korean entity wholly owned by                    Fonix |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **5.** | LTEL                    Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by                    Fonix |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **6.** | LTEL                    Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by                    LTEL                    Acquisition Corp. |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **7.** | LecStar                    Telecom, Inc., a Georgia corporation, wholly owned by LTEL Holdings                    Corporation |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **8.** | LecStar                    DataNet, Inc., a Georgia corporation, wholly owned by LTEL Holdings                    Corporation |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **9.** | Fonix                    Telecom, Inc., a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by Fonix |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **10.** | TOE                    Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation, wholly owned                    by                    Fonix |
|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **11.** | Fonix                    Speech Inc., a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by                    Fonix |
|--------|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
19753

#### State v. Mathison

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: R.H., A MINOR

PETITION OF: R.H., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 636 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# C_2021110EN.01002601.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Şanli v Council

(Case T-585/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - List of persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Action for annulment and compensation - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 110/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Dalokay Şanli (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Gürses and J. M. Langenberg, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Van Overmeire and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1084 of 30 July 2018 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2018/475 (OJ 2018 L 194, p. 144), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1071 of 30 July 2018 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/468 (OJ 2018 L 194, p. 23), in so far as they concern the applicant and, second, action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm suffered as a result of the unlawfulness of those measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Dalokay Şanli to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Dalokay Şanli to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
17533, 17862

#### Notartomaso v. Rivera

Affirmed
May, 27, 1999

21857

#### State v. Nguyen

Affirmed
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:May 17, 2005
    By:

/s/   Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-11657

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:95-cr-08083-DMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUSTINO SANTA, 

a.k.a. Tino, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(November 25, 2020)

USCA11 Case: 19-11657 Date Filed: 11/25/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Before MARTIN, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Justino Santa moved to reduce his sentence under section 404 of the First Step 

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222, § 404. The district court 

denied Santa’s motion because he “was sentenced as an Armed Career Criminal” 

and, thus, “his offense level under the armed career offender guideline [did] not 

change.” Mr. Santa has appealed.

When the district court denied Mr. Santa’s motion, it did not have the benefit 

of our decision in United States v. Jones, 962 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2020). We do, 

and now that we do, the government has commendably conceded that Mr. Santa is 

eligible to be considered for a reduced sentence under the First Step Act, and the 

district court is authorized to consider reducing his sentence under the Act. Having 

reviewed Jones and the record in this case, we accept the government’s concession, 

vacate the district court’s order in full, and remand for further proceedings under the 

First Step Act and Jones. On remand, the district court must provide the parties with 

the opportunity to respond in writing to the probation office’s memorandum. See

United States v. Jules, 595 F.3d 1239, 1245 (11th Cir. 2010).1

VACATED AND REMANDED. 

1 The court is grateful to attorney Emily J. Tidmore for accepting the appointment to 

represent Mr. Santa and for representing him so ably. 

USCA11 Case: 19-11657 Date Filed: 11/25/2020 Page: 2 of 2
#### State v. Rogers

18705

4/24/97

Affirmed
Chapter 2.4.4. – Infection with Marteilia refringens

Annex 22. Item 6.5.3. – Article 10.6.3. of Chapter 10.6. ‘Infection with IHNV’

CHAPTER 10.6.

INFECTION WITH INFECTIOUS HAEMATOPOIETIC NECROSIS VIRUS

[...]

Article 10.6.3.

Measures for the importation or transit of aquatic animal products for any purpose regardless of the infection with IHNV status of the exporting country, zone or compartment

The *aquatic animal products*listed below have been assessed as meeting the criteria for safety of *aquatic animal****products*in accordance with Article 5.4.1. When authorising the importation or transit of these *aquatic animal products*, *Competent Authorities*should not require any *sanitary measures*related to IHNV, regardless of the IHNV status of the *exporting country*, *zone*or *compartment*:

1)	*aquatic animal products* that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 90°C for at least 30 seconds, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates IHNV;

~~2)~~~~mechanically dried eviscerated fish that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 90°C for at least 30 seconds, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates IHNV;~~

~~3~~2)	fish *meal* that has been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 90°C for at least 30 seconds, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates IHNV;

~~4~~3)	fish oil;

~~5~~4)	fish skin leather.

[...]

____________

WOAH *Aquatic Manual* 2025	8
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AT
SEPTEMBER  30,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               7,926,000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11,452,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           597,000
<INVENTORY>                                         14,185,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    33,799,000
<PP&E>                                              13,964,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     130,218,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,556,000
<BONDS>                                             71,950,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                21,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          42,044,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       130,218,000
<SALES>                                             13,111,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       <blank>
<CGS>                                                7,424,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7,424,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,723,000<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,663,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5,938,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (2,966,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,755,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          4,000
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,751,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.15)


<FN>
(1)  Includes $1,582,000 of restricted cash.
(2)  Consists of depreciation, goodwill and other amortization.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

# AGENCY:

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

# ACTION:

Annual notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is given of the appointment of members to the Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

# DATES:

Membership is effective on December 12, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angela D. Bridges, Supervisory Budget and Finance Specialist, U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street NW—Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036-3457, (202) 606-5392.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Review Commission, as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) through (5), has established a Senior Executive Service PRB. The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and makes recommendations to the Chairman of the Review Commission regarding performance ratings, performance awards, and pay-for-performance adjustments. Members of the PRB serve for a period of 24 months. In the case of an appraisal of a career appointee, more than half of the members shall consist of career appointees, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(5). The names and titles of the PRB members are as follows:
    - Gisile Goethe, Director, Office of Resource Management, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board;
    - Peggy A. Gartner, Deputy Office Head, Office of Information and Resource Management, National Science Foundation;
    - Sara Snyder, Regional Director and Chief Administrative Judge, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.

Cynthia L. Attwood,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2023-27194 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7600-01-P