alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    237,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        157,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,714
<SALES>                                        303,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,353
<CGS>                                          259,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,516
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued January 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00886-CV

———————————

JASON SNYDER, Appellant

V.

H. MICHELLE GLOVER-TUCKER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1034418

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Jason Snyder, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order 

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of 
2

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
# C_2018301EN.01001801.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 19 June 2018 — AURES Holdings, a.s. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

(Case C-405/18)

(2018/C 301/25)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AURES Holdings, a.s.

Defendant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Questions referred

| 1. | Can the concept of freedom of establishment within the meaning of Article 49 TFEU (1) be held to cover a simple transfer of the place of a company’s management from one Member State to another Member State? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can the concept of freedom of establishment within the meaning of Article 49 TFEU (1) be held to cover a simple transfer of the place of a company’s management from one Member State to another Member State?

| 2. | If so, is it contrary to Article 49, Article 52 and Article 54 TFEU for national law not to allow an entity from another Member State, when relocating its place of business or place of management to the Czech Republic, to claim a tax loss incurred in that other Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, is it contrary to Article 49, Article 52 and Article 54 TFEU for national law not to allow an entity from another Member State, when relocating its place of business or place of management to the Czech Republic, to claim a tax loss incurred in that other Member State?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 C 326, p. 47.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  686,459
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 22,373
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      40,427
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   270,932
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,020,191
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         42,947
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             203,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       475,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          38,400
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               20,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             282,844
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            1,020,191
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   92,104
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         5,647
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  56,998
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  63,515
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     28,589
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           3,689
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              33,148
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    18,950
<NET-INCOME>                                14,198
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               14,198
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    25,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      22,520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 7, 2004                  /s/ Robert W. Peshek
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Robert W. Peshek, Senior Vice President
                                   and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q and shall not be treated as having
been filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LAMONT SHEPARD, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. R. PEREZ et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 13-15985 D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Barbara McAuliffe, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 9, 2015 San Francisco, California Before: GILMAN, ** GRABER, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

# FILED
JUL 21 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.Page 2 of 2 Even if Lamont Shepard did not abandon his failure-to-intervene claim against Officer Garcia, and even if Shep ard was not required to plead a separate failure-to-intervene claim in addition to his claim for excessive force, see Lolli v. Cnty. of Orange , 351 F.3d 410, 418 (9th Cir. 2003), any error in the district court’s decision to grant Officer Garcia’s Rule 50(a) motion was harmless. A failure-tointervene claim requires an underlying cons titutional violation. The jury, however, found that the defendants who were directly involved did not use excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment during the incident in question. Shepard does not challenge that verdict. Thus, Shepar d cannot prove that Officer Garcia failed to intervene in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The fact that Officer Garcia’s name was left on the verdict form even though he had been dismissed from the case does not provide a ground for reversal. Shepard cites no authority supporting the proposition that such a ministerial oversight may revive an otherwise invalid claim, and we are aware of none. AFFIRMED.
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____10034___________________________ 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
May 21, 1997

19404

#### State v. Aki

Affirmed
#### State v. Nakata; State v. Lau; State v. Daoang.

17317

8/18/94

Denied

878 P.2d 699
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Trading Partners Participating in

ePhytosanitary Certification

Last Modified: 

Print

Phytosanitary certificates allow importers and exporters to certify that plants and

plant products have been inspected, are free of pests, and conform to the

phytosanitary requirements of the country the product is being sent to. This table

lists which countries do and do not allow those certificates to be exchanged

electronically. Some of this information does not appear in the Phytosanitary Export

Database.

Loading...

A trading partner that is marked “Yes”, may choose to not send an ePhyto message

for a shipment. This could be due to limitations with the countries system, outages,

or other reasons. 

Requirements for Phytosanitary Certification

You can read about the receiving country's requirements for phytosanitary

certification of plant or plant products in the Phytosanitary Export Database (PExD).
## Reaction Scheme

Sanitized
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1996
<CASH>                                         115,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,309
<INVENTORY>                                     69,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,116
<PP&E>                                         175,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 529,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           925
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,460
<SALES>                                      1,764,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,764,920
<CGS>                                        1,503,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,688,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,639)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Zaremba,
      Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
      February 11, 2008




/s/
                Richard ZarembaRichard
                ZarembaSenior
                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer
                and Secretary




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained by
      MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
September 25, 2008

28800

#### State v. Cantiberos

Vacated and Remanded
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12283]


Notice of Receipt of Request From the Government of the Republic 
of India Under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of 
Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of 
Ownership of Cultural Property

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice of receipt of request from India for cultural property 
protection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Compton, Cultural Heritage 
Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (telephone: 202-632-
6301; e-email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0261776e72706d724271766376672c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6300160f13110c132310170217064d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>). Include ``India'' in the subject 
line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Government of the Republic of India made 
a request to the Government of the United States on September 12, 2023, 
under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of 
Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of 
Ownership of Cultural Property. India's request seeks U.S. import 
restrictions on archaeological and ethnological materials representing 
India's cultural patrimony. The Cultural Heritage Center website 
provides instructions for public comment and additional information on 
the request, including categories of material that may be included in 
import restrictions: https://eca.state.gov/highlight/cultural-property-advisory-committee-meeting-january-30-february-1-2024. This notice is 
published pursuant to authority vested in the Assistant Secretary of 
State for Educational and Cultural Affairs and pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 
2602(f)(1).

Allison R. Davis Lehmann,
Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-27322 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2023045EN.01003403.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/34

---

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Wendel and Others v Commission

(Case T-124/18) (1)

(2023/C 45/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
#### State v. Schwenker

16568

3/29/95

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6751

JERMAINE DEANDREA WALKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-82-2) Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: September 2, 2005 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Deandrea Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jermaine Deandrea Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. United States , No. CA-05-82-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2005 & entered Apr. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1)  Magnum Hunter Production, Inc., a Texas corporation
2)  Gruy Petroleum Management Co., a Texas corporation
3)  Hunter Gas Gathering, Inc., a Texas corporation
4)  ConMag Energy Corporation, a Texas corporation
5)  TrapMar Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation
6)  Pintail Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7)  PEC (Delaware), Inc., a Delaware corporation
8)  Prize Operating Company, a Delaware corporation
9)  Oklahoma Gas Processing, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10) Prize Energy Resources, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11) Canvasback Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
12) Redhead Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
13) Pintail Oil and Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation
14) Inesco Corporation, a Texas corporation
15) SPL Gas Marketing Inc., a Texas corporation
16) Midland Hunter Petroleum Limited Liability Company,
      a Wyoming limited liability company
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CENTEX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy R. Eller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLER
Timothy R. Eller
Chief Executive Officer Date:
May 26, 2005
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Inspection: Findings related to 9 CFR 114.11 and Out of Cooler 

Episodes

CVB-WI-0081 02

ICWI0047.01

CVB-WI-IC

12 Aug 2022

CVB-Released