alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12101Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sandi Damitz (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 28, 2023 - 12:15amIt was great to read about the Capitol Power Plant since I had visited Washington, DC in September of 2020 and hope to return in the future for a more detailed visit.  I am retired from Pacific Gas & Electric Company in Northern California.  I worked as an Operator at their Geysers Geothermal Power Plant facility in Lake and Sonoma Counties until 2000 when PG&E sold the Geysers to Calpine.  I was extremely saddened to no longer be able to work at the Geysers and retired 11 years later from the clerical side of the company with 33 years of service.  Working as an Operator at this facility was the best job and experience I had in my working career (especially as a woman in a male dominated position).  I would love to be able to tour your facility when I return to Washington, DC in the future.  Thanks so much for your pictures and story about the Capitol Power Plant.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 21 - LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


          Subsidiary                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation

          P.W. Stephens Residential, Inc.   . . . . . . .   California
          P.W. Stephens Contractors, Inc. . . . . . . . .   Missouri
          P.W. Stephens Services, Inc.  . . . . . . . . .   Missouri
          J.L. Manta, Inc.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   Illinois


          Each of those subsidiaries is wholly-owned.  This list does not
          include inactive, sold or discontinued subsidiaries.
# C_2019131EN.01005901.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/59

---

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Intercontinental Exchange Holdings v EUIPO (BRENT)

(Case T-725/18) (1)

(2019/C 131/69)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018128DE.01002201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.5.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 128/22 |

---

Berichtigung des Abkommens zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und Japan über die gegenseitige Anerkennung

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 284 vom 29. Oktober 2001](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2001_284_R_TOC)
)

Auf Seite 13, Sektoraler Anhang über Elektroerzeugnisse, Teil A „Anwendungs- und Geltungsbereich“, Nummer 1:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „1. | Dieser sektorale Anhang gilt für die Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren für alle Telekommunikationsendgeräte und Funkausrüstungen, für die in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft beziehungsweise in Japan Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren vorgeschrieben sind, die von den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen gemäß den in Abschnitt I des Teils B dieses sektoralen Anhangs aufgeführten Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften jeder Vertragspartei durchgeführt werden.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „1. | Dieser sektorale Anhang gilt für die Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren für alle Elektroerzeugnisse, für die in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft beziehungsweise in Japan Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren vorgeschrieben sind, die von den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen gemäß den in Abschnitt I des Teils B dieses sektoralen Anhangs aufgeführten Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften jeder Vertragspartei durchgeführt werden.“ |

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 628 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the AfricanAmericans who duly won election to the House during the post-Civil 

War Reconstruction Era but were wrongly denied the right to take 

their seats should be recognized as former Members of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2016 

Mr. RICHMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the African-Americans who duly won election to the 

House during the post-Civil War Reconstruction Era but 

were wrongly denied the right to take their seats should 

be recognized as former Members of the House. 

Whereas during the post-Civil War Reconstruction Era, many 

African-Americans won election to the House of Representatives but were wrongly denied the right to serve 

as Members; 

Whereas James Lewis of Louisiana, who won an election in 

1869, was denied his seat in the House when his credentials were challenged; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 628 IH 

Whereas John Willis Menard of Louisiana, who also won an 

election in 1869, was denied his seat in the House on the 

basis of a challenge by the individual he defeated; 

Whereas Pinckney B.S. Pinchback of Louisiana, who had 

been elected previously to the House, conceded his seat 

in the House on the assumption that he would be seated 

in the Senate, but was denied his seat by the Democratic 

majority; and 

Whereas Josiah Thomas Walls of Florida, who had been 

elected previously to the House, won an election in 1874 

but was denied his seat in the House on the basis of a 

challenge by the individual he defeated, a former colonel 

in the Confederate army: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) James Lewis, John Willis Menard, Pinck4 ney B.S. Pinchback, and Josiah Thomas Walls duly 

5 won election to the House during the post-Civil War 

6 Reconstruction Era; 

7 (2) these individuals were wrongly denied the 

8 right to take their seats as Members of the House; 

9 and 

10 (3) these individuals should be recognized as 

11 former Members of the House. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-59,535-07

IN RE REGINA LD TYRONE HOL LINS, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 9411011-C IN THE 351ST DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator filed a motion for leave to file an application for a wr i t o f m an damus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He alleg es that he filed pleading s in the distric t court that wer e not forwa rded to th is Co u

rt. Relator identifies: his Memorandum and a supporting Appendix that he filed wi t h his Article 11.07 application on Fe b. 24, 2022; his Reply to the State’s Answer , and his Amended Proposed Finding s and Conclusions, both filed on April 11, 2022; and his “Admission of Error and Mot ion for Court to Take J udicial Noti ce of Previous Procee dings to Corre ct and Ma ke Record of Error ,” filed on April 14, 2022. Relator also contends that he has not rec eived notice and copies of the State’s pl eading s and the trial court’s orders. See Art. 11.07 § 7; T E X . R. A P P . P R O C . 73.4(b)( 2).2

The district cler

k has a minist eria l duty t o i n cl u d e in the rec ord transmitted to this Court “among any other pertinent paper s or supplements,” a copy of the application, any answe rs filed, any proposed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law, the district court’s finding s of fac t and conclusions of law, and any objections to the court’s finding s of fac t and conclusions of law filed by either party

. See Art. 11.07, § 3(c) ; T E X . R. A P P . P R O C . 73.4(b)( 4). The cler k also has a minist eria l duty send copies to all parties in the case when cer tain materia ls are filed or made part of the rec ord, and to “immediately notify all parties in the case ” when the c lerk tra nsmits t he re cord to this Court. T E X . R. A P P . P R O C . 73.4(b)( 2). Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , shall fo rw ar d to this Court Relator’s pleading s identified above or shall respond that Relator has not filed them or made them part of the

rec ord. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). The cler k shall notify the parties when the cler k transmits the rec ord to this Court. T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 2). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the da te of this order

.

Filed: AUGUST 24, 2022 Do not publish
January 5, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF ESTANISLADA RODRIGUEZ

NO. 14-16-00507-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on December 16, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Terry Garcia.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial                           ( print page 86351)                        property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Neurological and Neuropsychological Injuries and Disorders II.                    

*Date:*                         January 2, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Todd Everett White, Ph.D. Scientific Review, Officer Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-3962,                         *todd.white@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 7, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-27298 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2018427EN.01001701.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 14 September 2018 — Energiavirasto

(Case C-578/18)

(2018/C 427/24)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Energiavirasto

Other parties: A, Caruna Oy

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 37 of Directive 2009/72/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC to be interpreted as meaning that a person who is a consumer customer of a network company and who has brought a case concerning the network company before the national regulatory authority is to be regarded as an ‘affected party’ within the meaning of paragraph 17 of the article mentioned, which is affected by the decision of the regulatory authority and is therefore authorised to file an appeal at a national court against a decision affecting the network company made by the national regulatory authority? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 37 of Directive 2009/72/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC to be interpreted as meaning that a person who is a consumer customer of a network company and who has brought a case concerning the network company before the national regulatory authority is to be regarded as an ‘affected party’ within the meaning of paragraph 17 of the article mentioned, which is affected by the decision of the regulatory authority and is therefore authorised to file an appeal at a national court against a decision affecting the network company made by the national regulatory authority?

| 2. | If the person designated in the first question is not to be regarded as an ‘affected party’ within the meaning of Article 37 of Electricity Market Directive 2009/72/EC, does a consumer customer in a position like that of the appellant in the main proceedings have a right on any other legal basis under EU law to be involved before the regulatory authority in the treatment of a request made thereby for the introduction of a measure or to have the case reviewed by a national court, or is this question governed by national law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the person designated in the first question is not to be regarded as an ‘affected party’ within the meaning of Article 37 of Electricity Market Directive 2009/72/EC, does a consumer customer in a position like that of the appellant in the main proceedings have a right on any other legal basis under EU law to be involved before the regulatory authority in the treatment of a request made thereby for the introduction of a measure or to have the case reviewed by a national court, or is this question governed by national law?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 211, p. 55.

---
Motion Granted; Order filed December 31, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00447-CV

____________

MARCUS A. TOWNLEY AND ERIN M. MCCAIN, Appellants

V.

LINDA A. LANIER, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1077886

ORDER

This appeal is from an order signed March 6, 2019. Appellants filed a notice 

of appeal May 31, 2019. Appellant, Marcus A. Townley, filed a Statement of 

Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court. “A party who files a 

Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay 

costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 

145(a). Appellant Townley has not been ordered to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. 

Alexandra McDaniel, the court reporter for the County Civil Court at Law 

No. 4 the is directed to file the reporter’s record within 30 days of the date of this 

order.
PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
H. Res. 576 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 5, 2016. 

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker to notify the President of the United 

States that a quorum of the House has assembled and that 

the House is ready to receive any communication that he may 

be pleased to make. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 8, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Ground Advantage® Contract 9 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 86688)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-103, CP2024-107.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-27406 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 23.2


                          CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP,
                    INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
MicroTel International Inc.
Rancho Cucamonga, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-74281, 333-71035, 333-69571, 333-12567 and 333-65528) on
Form S-8 of our report dated February 25, 2002, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of MicroTel International
Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

/S/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 23, 2004
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeAbout UsNews & Notices
Volume 25 of Tholos Magazine Now Available
Articles include spotlights on the U.S. Capitol Grounds, U.S. Botanic Garden (USBG), sustainability and more.
By AOC Staff | April 20, 2023
        
                  Image
    Photo of an orchid.

The latest edition of the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) employee magazine, Tholos, is now available. Highlights include the articles below.

**Feature:**Arboretum in the City
	**USBG Highlight:**Long-Time Partnership Yields Beautiful Results
	**Sustainability Spotlight:**Beyond the Dome: Fort Meade
	**Meet the Team:**Photography and Technical Imaging BranchDownload Volume 25, or read the stories from this and previous issues on our blog.
          
    
      Recent Stories
Related Articles
            
          Public Notice

  U.S. Capitol Cherry Blossoms Map

On the U.S. Capitol campus, the AOC Capitol Grounds and Arboretum crew cares for groups of both Yoshino and Japanese flowering cherry trees.
    Public Notice

  Volume 27 of Tholos Magazine Now Available

Highlights include articles featuring the Architect's Citation Award winner, sustainability, summer internships and the U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree.
    Public Notice

  Six Tips for Sledding Safely on Capitol Hill

This winter, sections of the U.S. Capitol Grounds West Front may be open for community sledding during daylight hours (dawn to dusk).
    Public Notice

  FY 2023 Performance and Accountability Report Available

The Architect of the Capitol's Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2023 is now available online.
    
                      More News Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### State v. Pillos

23031

09/14/2001

Affirmed