alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RALIEGH SCOTT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3804 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. )

) Opinion filed June 19, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese and Margaret O. Steinbeck, Judges. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. BLACK, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jay N. Torok, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this annual report of Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report; (4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the
annual report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the Evaluation
Date); and (c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; (5) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls (a
pre-existing term relating to internal controls regarding financial reporting) which
could adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the companys auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal controls; and (6) The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: January 18, 2005/s/ Jay N. TorokJay N. TorokChairman of the Board and
Principal Executive Officer
#### State v. Martin

15848

10/20/94

Vacated and Remanded
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commenting Opportunities: Wildlife

Services

Last Modified: 

Print

Tell us what you think!

Public participation is vital to the decision-making process in Wildlife Services. Your

input helps us make better-informed decisions about actions that may interest or

impact you. We offer opportunities for public comment. You can view and provide
feedback on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents.

Members of the public are also welcome to join annual meetings of our National

Wildlife Services Advisory Committee.

Latest Commenting Opportunities

6/02/22

USDA Is Notifying the Public That the Secretary of Agriculture Is Soliciting

Nominations for the National Wildlife Services Advisory Committee

Final NEPA Documents

Visit Wildlife Services NEPA Documents to view copies of our final environmental

assessments, environmental impact statements, findings of no significant impact (or

"FONSIs"), and records of decision. For easy reference, the documents are organized

by area of focus (State or national program).

Related Links

APHIS: All Federal Register Posts

APHIS News and Updates

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about Wildlife Services, sign up for email updates.

Subscribe
FACILITY DOCUMENT FORM
BLUEPRINT/BLUEPRINT LEGEND — PRELIMINARY REVIEW (BCA)
[9 CFR 108.4 and 108.5(b)]

Firm Est. No.

Site Address

Building/Floor

ML. Date Received.

Submission Type: ONew Address oNew Building oRemodeled Facility oPre-licensing oRevision

Information to Review (add comment if necessary)

BLUEPRINT

1. Scale Indicated? [108.4(a)] oOYES oNO- Comment
2. Rooms Identified? [108.4(e)] OYES oNO~ Comment
3. Stationary Equipment Identified? [108.4(f)] OYES oNO~ Comment
4. Compass Point? [108.4(h)] OYES oNO~ Comment
5. Building Number Included? [108.4(i)] OYES ocNO- Comment.
6. Date of Preparation Included? [108.4(j)] oYES cNO Comment
7. Signature of Liaison/Alternate? [108.4(k)] SYES cNO Comment.
8. Summary of Changes? [108.6(a)] oYES cNO Comment
9. Two Copies? [108.7] ocYES cNO Comment

BLUEPRINT LEGEND (add comment if necessary)
1. Legend Identified by Building/Floor? [108.5] SYES cNO Comment

2. Pages numbered? [108.5] GYES cNO Comment
3. Rooms Identified? [108.5(b)(1)] GYES cNO Comment
4. Summary of Changes? [108.6(a)] GYES cNO Comment
5. Two Copies? [108.7] oYES cNO Comment

BLUEPRINT LEGEND ADDENDUM LISTING
co Decontamination Procedures
co Other Precautions against Cross Contamination
o Fraction List(s)
1.

2.

3.

co Exemptions to 109, Sterilization of Equipment
Other (list)
1.

2.

BLUEPRINT LEGEND ADDENDUM (add comment if necessary)
1. Legend Identified by Building/Floor? [108.5] cYES cNO Comment

2. Pages numbered? [108.5] oYES cNO Comment
3. Summary of Changes? [108.6(a)] cYES cNO Comment
4. Two Copies? [108.7] cYES cNO Comment
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

BCA ACTION:

Submit to the Biologics Specialist Return to Firm

ICFRMO0019.07 (16Nov17) wlh
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 831 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 831

Promoting awareness of motorcycle profiling and encourage collaboration 
  and communication with the motorcycle community and law enforcement 
              officials to prevent instances of profiling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2016

   Mr. Ribble (for himself and Mr. Walberg) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Promoting awareness of motorcycle profiling and encourage collaboration 
  and communication with the motorcycle community and law enforcement 
              officials to prevent instances of profiling.

Whereas motorcycle ridership continues to increase over time with registrations 
        growing from 3,826,373 in 1997 to 8,404,687 in 2013;
Whereas a survey conducted by the Motorcycle Profiling Project shows increases 
        in the number of motorcyclists that feel that they are profiled by law 
        enforcement;
Whereas motorcycle profiling means the arbitrary practice of law enforcement 
        using the fact that a person rides a motorcycle or wears motorcycle 
        related apparel as a factor in deciding to stop and question, take 
        enforcement action, arrest, or search a person or vehicle with or 
        without legal basis under the United States Constitution;
Whereas complaints surrounding motorcycle profiling have been cited in all 50 
        States;
Whereas nationwide protests to raise awareness and combat motorcycle profiling 
        have been held in multiple States;
Whereas in 2011, Washington signed into law legislation stating that the 
        criminal justice training commission shall ensure that issues related to 
        motorcycle profiling are addressed in basic law enforcement training and 
        offered to in-service law enforcement officers in conjunction with 
        existing training regarding profiling;
Whereas the 2011, Washington law has reduced profiling incidents by over 90 
        percent and the stops that do occur are being dismissed 100 percent of 
        the time; and
Whereas in the spring of 2016, Maryland became the second State to pass a law 
        addressing the issue of motorcycle profiling: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) promotes increased public awareness on the issue of 
        motorcycle profiling;
            (2) encourages collaboration and communication with the 
        motorcycle community and law enforcement to engage in efforts 
        to end motorcycle profiling; and
            (3) urges State law enforcement officials to include 
        statements condemning motorcycle profiling in written policies 
        and training materials.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Hashimoto

15095

3/02/92

Denied
# C_2021471EN.01003401.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Nec v Commission

(Case T-341/18) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price coordination throughout the EEA - Attribution to the parent company of the infringement committed by its subsidiary - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity of the infringement - Increase in the amount of the fine for repeated infringement - Proportionality - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2021/C 471/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nec Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: O. Brouwer and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers, and by R. Bachour, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, L. Wildpanner and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, primarily, annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 1768 final of 21 March 2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40136 — Capacitors), in so far as that decision finds that the applicant personally participated in the infringement, and, in the alternative, annulment of the fines imposed on the applicant or a reduction in the amount of those fines.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nec Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nec Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
Exhibit 10.3

 



 

July 17, 2018

 

Dear Brian,

 

I am pleased to confirm our formal offer of employment to you for the position of Senior Vice President  & Chief Financial Officer for American Home Shield. The purpose of this letter is to summarize the terms of our offer.

 

As Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer for American Home Shield located in Memphis, TN  you will report to Rex Tibbens, Chief Executive Officer. Your effective start date is to be mutually agreed upon.

 

Base Salary

 

Your base compensation in this position will be at an annual rate of $430,000. This will be paid on the  15th and the last business day of each month.

 

Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)

 

In this position, you will be eligible to receive a bonus payment with a target of 60% of your base salary  under the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”).

 

Equity

 

Sign-On Equity Award

 

Upon approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, you will receive a Restricted  Stock Unit award (“RSUs”) with a grant date value of $250,000.

 

The actual number of RSUs will be determined by dividing the grant date value by the Fair Market Value  of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award which is typically on your date of hire.

 

Additional information on the Plan, including the Plan documents, will be provided to you upon approval  of the awards.

 

Annual Equity Award

 

Beginning in 2019, you will be eligible to be considered for annual equity awards with a target grant date  value of 125% of your annual base salary, with the form of such awards to be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board.

 











 

Additional information on the Plan, including the Plan documents, will be provided to you upon approval  of the awards.

 

Conditions of Employment

 

This letter shall not constitute an employment contract and nothing herein changes your status as an “at-will”  employee.

 

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me 901-597-1852. Please return your signed offer  letter to me by July 25, 2018.

 

Brian, we look forward to having you as a key member of the American Home Shield team. Our success  hinges upon the people who make up our organization and we are excited about the strength you will lend to our team.

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Rex   Tibbens
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Rex Tibbens
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
I accept this offer of employment   under the terms and conditions set forth above.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Signature:
    	
/s/ Brian K. Turcotte
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
7/19/18
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of Directors 

MAF Bancorp, Inc. 

 

We consent to incorporationby reference in the registration statements (No.’s 33-79110, 333-83534, 333-61792, 333-72863, 333-72865, 333-107-618, 333-110986, 333-110990,) on Form S-8 of MAF Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the consolidatedstatements of financial condition of MAF Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of MAF Bancorp, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill in 2002. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 11, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00896-CV

IN RE Jose Luis TUNON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 31, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 20, 2013, relator Jose Luis Tunon filed a petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for emergency stay of the trial court’s order allowing periods of possession and access for

relator’s minor child with his mother, who is a resident of Mexico. The court has considered 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are denied.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010CVO001002C1, styled In the Interest of M.T., A Child, pending in the 

County Court at Law No. 1, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Alvino (Ben) Morales presiding.
# C_2020095EN.01003102.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/31

---

Order of the General Court of 30 January 2020 –Latvia v Commission

(Case T-293/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common fisheries policy - Treaty of Paris on the archipelago of Spitsbergen (Norway) - Fishing opportunities for snow crab around the area of Svalbard (Norway) - Regulation (EU) 2017/127 - EU registered vessels authorised to fish - Detention of a Latvian vessel - Article 265 TFEU - Invitation to act - Adoption of a position by the Commission - Measure not producing binding legal effects - Inadmissibility)

(2020/C 95/40)

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: V. Soņeca, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, E. Paasivirta, I. Naglis and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission’s letter of 12 March 2018 by which that institution adopted its position on the invitation to act which the Republic of Latvia had addressed to it, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU, by letter of 22 December 2017 and which was intended, in essence, to require the Commission to adopt measures relating to the defence of the fishing rights and European Union interests in the Svalbard fishing area (Norway) and, second, to order the Commission to adopt a position in that regard which is not the source of legal effects unfavourable to the Republic of Latvia.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain; |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the Kingdom of Spain;

| 3. | The Republic of Latvia shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene; |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Latvia shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the application for leave to intervene;

| 4. | The Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Latvia and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Latvia and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
TERRA NITROGEN COMPANY, L.P.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Hoker, Vice President of Terra
Nitrogen GP Inc., the general partner of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ RICHARD A. HOKER Richard A. Hoker Vice President and Corporate Controller
of Terra Nitrogen GP Inc., general partner of
Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P.
(Principal Financial Officer)Dated: November 5, 2010


29

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23.1




June 10, 1997

General Nutrition Companies, Inc.
921 Penn Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Dear Sirs:

We   have  made  a  review,  in  accordance  with  standards
established  by  the American Institute of Certified  Public
Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial  information
of  General  Nutrition Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries  for
the twelve weeks ended April 26, 1997 and April 27, 1996, as
indicated in our report dated May 13, 1997; because  we  did
not  perform  an  audit, we expressed  no  opinion  on  that
information.

We  are  aware that our report referred to above, which  was
included  in  your  Quarterly Report on Form  10-Q  for  the
quarter  ended April 26, 1997, is incorporated by  reference
in Registration Statement Nos. 33-58096, 33-68590, 33-93370,
333-00128, and 333-21397 on Form S-8.

We  also  are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant
to  Rule  436(c) under the Securities Act of  1933,  is  not
considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared  or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
by  an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
that Act.

Yours truly,



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfumania Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 1, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael W. Katz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/ Michael W. KatzMichael W. KatzPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJune 15, 2010
#### Richie Woodbridge, Appellant, v. A. M. Thrasher and B. A. Howard, Appellees.

An appeal from an Order of the Circuit Court within and for the County of Seminole.

*714Hilburn & Merryday, for Appellant;

Wilson & Householder, for Appellees.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellees at costs of appellant.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.4 - CFO 302 CERTIFICATION

          INTERLAND, INC. CERTIFICATION FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

I, Gonzalo Troncoso, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Interland, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

Date: December 22, 2005                      /s/ Gonzalo Troncoso
                                             __________________________________
                                             Gonzalo Troncoso
                                             Executive Vice President and Chief
                                             Financial Officer