alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.6



FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Sanderson Farms, Inc. (the “Corporation”) as set forth herein.
WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the Sanderson Farms, Inc. and Affiliates Employee Stock Ownership Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to comply with IRS Notice 2014-19 regarding the application of the U.S. v. Windsor decision to qualified retirement plans. 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of June 26, 2013, as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 13.2 of the Plan is revised to read as follows:


Section 13.12      Governing Law. The Plan and all provisions thereof shall be construed, administered, and enforced in accordance with the Code,  ERISA, and the laws of State of Mississippi to the extent such state laws are not superseded, limited, or preempted by the Code, ERISA, or other applicable federal laws, regulations, or guidance.    


		
	2.
	Except as otherwise provided in this First Amendment, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this First Amendment to the Plan on this 23rd day of July, 2014.
	
		
	 
	







SANDERSON FARMS, INC.


                    


By: /s/ D. Michael Cockrell










0S0187-038943
#### Williamson v. Hawaii Paroling Authority

22882

12/26/2000

Granted
H. Res. 841 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 6, 2016. 

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Mark Takai, a Representative from the State of Hawaii. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of 

the deceased. 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
20803

#### State v. McCurdy

Affirmed
#### State v. Fernandez

18131

5/09/95

Reversed and Remanded
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10(a)


CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY


Non-Employee Director Compensation for 2017
Board and Committee Retainer for 2017    
$119,000 shall be paid in cash
$129,000 shall be paid in shares of Campbell stock
Additional Retainers for Chairman of the Board, Committee Chairs and Audit Committee Members
In addition to the above Board and Committee retainer, the following amounts shall be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Campbell stock:
	
		
	$350,000
	Chairman of the Board

	$25,000
	Audit Committee chair

	$20,000
	Compensation and Organization Committee chair

	$15,000
	Finance Committee chair

	$15,000
	Governance Committee chairs

	$7,500
	Audit Committee members (excluding the Audit Committee chair)




Prior to the beginning of a calendar year, a non-employee director may elect to (i) receive shares of Campbell stock in lieu of the cash portion of any retainer (such election to be made in 10% increments) and/or (ii) defer all or a portion of any cash or stock retainer in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Retirement Plan.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

AIRPORT RESTAURANT, LLC, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-441

LT Case No. 2019-10300-CIDL

MARLON BATES, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed January 17, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County, 

Kathryn D. Weston, Judge

Daniel S. Weinger and Nicholas J.

Christopolis, of Luks, Santaniello,

Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend,

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

James C. Blecke, of The Haggard

Law Firm, P.A., Coral Gables, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and JAY, JJ., concur.
#### Fukida v. Hon/Hawaii Service and Repair

22514

04/30/2001

Vacated in part & Affirmed
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 15

                                                  [Logo of Arthur Andersen LLP]


Report of Independent Public Accountants

To the Shareholders of Education Management Corporation and Subsidiaries


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of
Education Management Corporation (a Pennsylvania corporation) and Subsidiaries
as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, the related condensed consolidated statements of
income for the three and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 and
the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods
ended March 31, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Education
Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 (not presented
herein), and, in our report dated July 27, 2001, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on that statement. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2001 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet
from which it has been derived.



                                                        /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
April 26, 2002
5 . 1 . 2017

Contact CVB Program and Information Management and Security 

(PIMS) at: CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov

Do you have an idea to enhance the NCAH Portal?

We are gearing up for a project that will address some of the requests we’ve heard from 

NCAH Portal users since we went live. If you have an idea that you don’t see in the list 

below, send it to CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov by June 1, 2017. All ideas will be 

reviewed by the Change Control Board and assessed by the system developer. If approved, 

your enhancement will be added to the project to be deployed in a future version of the 

NCAH Portal. [Some requests/ideas may not be approved for various reasons; such as, an 

inefficient balance of resources to implement the idea vs. the benefit to users or if an idea 

poses a security risk.] 

Notes on future issues...

Vol. 2 ISSUE 4

NCAH PORTAL news for CVB

We recently posted a new user guide focusing on digital 

signatures and documents containing them so we won’t be 

dedicating a future issue to this topic. 

Refer to User Guide #12—Working with Digital Signatures.

Digital Signatures—What 

you need to know

NCAH Portal Enhancements received to date

As a NCAH Portal user...

1. ... I want to see the ML# associated with my 2007 submission.

2. ... I want to be able to save a 2007 submission as a PDF, similar to what is available for APHIS 2048 and 2049.

3. ... I want to see the Product Code on my daily portal emails.

4. ... I want to be able to search by Product Code and/or Serial # in the CVB Historical Search.

5. ... I want to be able to attach multiple documents in the MISC, Letter area of the 2008 module of the portal.

6. ... I want to be able to search based on the date range of the “Last Action Date” in the CVB Historical Search.

Helpful Information when using the NCAH Portal

 If you receive notification that a Mail Log Item has been completed and it should have 

attachments with it, you should receive those attachments at the same time as the 

notification. There is no delay, so if you don't see attachments that should be there, 

notify CVB promptly at CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov.

 File names that are uploaded to the NCAH Portal should not include anything but letters, 

numbers, underscores, and hyphens - any other characters included in a file name are 

removed by the NCAH Portal.
# C_2022340EN.01002701.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — ABLV Bank v SRB

(Case T-280/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Decision of the SRB not to adopt a resolution scheme - Action for annulment - Act adversely affecting a person - Interest in bringing proceedings - Standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility in part - Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Power of the author of the measure - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Equal treatment)

(2022/C 340/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ABLV Bank AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. De Carpentier, E. Muratori and H. Ehlers, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas Andrés, lawyer, and B. Heenan, Solicitor)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Central Bank, (represented by: R. Ugena, A. Witte and A. Lefterov, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 23 February 2018 not to adopt resolution schemes in respect of the credit institutions ABLV Bank AS and ABLV Bank Luxembourg SA within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ABLV Bank AS to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ABLV Bank AS to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB);

| 3. | Orders the European Central Bank (ECB) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Central Bank (ECB) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
18543

#### Yomes v. Ward

Affirmed
Learn more: www.aphis.usda.gov/animalwelfare/aids 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care

AC-21-002 • Issued April 2021

Housing Two-Toed Sloths 

Sloths do best in housing that imitates their natural environment.

Environmental Conditions and Light 

Sloths can’t regulate their body temperature 

the way other animals do. If the environment is 

too warm or too cold, it can slow or even shut 

down their digestive system. Sloths need: 

l Constant warm temperatures between 

75 and 85 °F 

l High humidity of 60–80%

l Protected areas free from drafts

l Access to heated and shaded/cooler areas 

when housed outdoors

The right lighting promotes normal activity 

patterns. Sloths benefit from direct sunlight 

or a broad-spectrum light source for basking. 

Shade (simulating leaf cover) allows sloths to 

adjust their exposure to suit their needs. A light 

cycle set to 12 hours on/12 hours off mimics 

light in the tropics. 

Enclosures 

Well-designed enclosures support natural 

sloth behaviors such as hanging upside down 

or reclining on their backs. Essential housing 

components include: 

l A climbing structure with a central trunk and 

branches of different widths and heights 

l Loose, non-toxic substrate (such as shavings, 

dirt, mulch, or leaf litter) deep enough for 

digging near the base of the central trunk to 

support normal elimination behaviors 

l Platforms, hammocks, and tree nooks to offer 

varied resting areas

l Clean drinking water at multiple levels from a 

hanging bottle and a dish 

l Visual screens such as plant material or den 

boxes for hiding 

l When group housed, space for each sloth to 

sleep away from others

PRACTICAL TIP

Sloths have long 

claws that wear 

down naturally with 

movement. An enclosure 

design that encourages 

movement may reduce 

the need to trim their 

claws, which can require 

sedation. Hanging dietary 

items at various levels 

helps further promote 

natural exploration 

and movement.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                         ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of EMRISE Corporation
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 14, 2006                  By: /s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Carmine T. Oliva
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (principal executive officer)


Dated: December 14, 2006                  By: /s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Carmine T. Oliva
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                              (principal financial officer)


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2015

No. 04-15-00215-CV

IN RE Gabriela Basurto MARTINEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On April 10, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the 

opinion that a serious question concerning the status of the trial court’s plenary power and the 

mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The 

respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in this court 

no later than May 5, 2015. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on April 15, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CVF001593 D3, styled Gabriela Basurto Martinez, Individually and 

as Representative of the Estate of Jose Basurto Martinez v. M&T Bank; M&T Mortgage Corporation; Federal 

Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; and County of Webb, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb

County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca “Beckie” Palomo, presiding.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert B. Knutson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1). The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: May 15,
2003



/s/ ROBERT B.
KNUTSONRobert B. Knutson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Education Management Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert T. McDowell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1). The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2). The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2003



/s/ ROBERT T.
MCDOWELLRobert T. McDowell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2019164EN.01000301.xml

| 13.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 27 November 2018 — JA v Skarb Państwa, represented by the Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Prezes Rady Ministrów, Minister Sprawiedliwości and Minister Finansów

(Case C-745/18)

(2019/C 164/04)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: JA

Respondent: Skarb Państwa, represented by the Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Senat Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Prezes Rady Ministrów, Minister Sprawiedliwości and Minister Finansów

Question referred

Should Articles 73 and 78(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) and the preceding Article 11.A(1)(a) and 11.A(2)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, (2) understood in the light of the general principles of a Member State’s liability to provide compensation for damage, as established in the case-law of the Court of Justice (including, in particular, in the judgments of 19 November 1991, Francovich and Others, C-6/90 and C-9/90, EU:C:1991:428; and of 5 March 1996, Brasserie du Pêcheur and Factortame and Others, C-46/93 and C-48/93, EU:C:1996:79), be interpreted as meaning that, with effect from 1 May 2004, they give rise to an obligation on a Member State which acceded to the European Union on that date to lay down regulations providing for the granting to a trustee in bankruptcy or insolvency of remuneration increased by the amount of value added tax (VAT) payable on that remuneration?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

---
# C_2020114EN.01000601.xml

| 6.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/6

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — ZF v Commission

(Case T-605/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Pension - Decision determining pension rights - Pension statements - Action for annulment - Time limit for lodging a complaint - Delay - Purely confirmatory act - Partial inadmissibility - Recovery of undue payments - Classification in grade and step - Multiplication factor - Withdrawal of an unlawful act - Legitimate expectation - Reasonable time)

(2020/C 114/03)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZF (represented by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by B. Mongin and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the note of 30 November 2017 by which the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission amended, with effect from 1 April 2015, the applicant’s retirement pension rights, and the note of 31 January 2018 in which it informed the applicant of the amount of the balance of the European Union’s debts against him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of ZF’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of ZF’s costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.

---
### DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy

RULEMAKING TITLE: Energy Conservation Program for Consumer

Products: Test Procedure for Dishwashers

Placeholder page for:



### Docket Number EE-RM-TP-99-500

Comment Number 39

Name and Title of Commentato r : IEE Committee Draft

Affiliation and Address of Commentator : International Electrotechnical Commission



## Missing Comment Number 39

RESERVED

NO DOCUMENT
January 30, 1998

18658

#### Lopes v. Lopes

Affirmed