alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Tonin POPAJ and Klementina Popaj, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Nos. 02-4690-AG(L), 02-4697-AG(CON).

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2005.

Marisa C. Petrella, Petrella & Associates, P.C., Southfield, Michigan, for Petitioners.

Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney of the Eastern District of New York (Varuni Nelson, Steven Kim, Margaret M. Kolbe, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Respondent.

PRESENT: WALKER, Chief Judge, B.D. PARKER, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, at Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 20th day of October, two thousand and five.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED *712AND DECREED that the petitions for review be DENIED.

Petitioners Tonin Popaj and Klementina Popaj, citizens of Albania, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) entered on October 2, 2002, affirming without opinion a June 23, 2000, decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The IJ rejected the petitioners’ application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration .and Nationality Act of 1952, see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(a), 1231(b)(3), and denied relief under Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), adopted Dec. 10, 1984, S. Treaty Doc. No. 100-20 (1988), 1465 U.N.T.S. 85; 8 C.F.R. § 208.16.

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

When reviewing asylum claims, “[w]e review the factual findings underlying the [IJ’s] determinations under the substantial evidence standard, reversing only if no reasonable fact-finder could have failed to find that petitioner suffered past persecution or had a well-founded fear of future persecution or torture.” *Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft,*357 F.3d 169, 177 (2d Cir.2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); *see also Secaida-Rosales v. INS,*331 F.3d 297, 305 (2d Cir.2003) (noting that when the BIA summarily affirms the IJ’s decision, we review the decision of the IJ directly).

In this case, the IJ’s adverse findings, relating principally to material inconsistencies and omissions in the record, were supported by substantial evidence. *See Chen v. INS,*344 F.3d 272, 275 (2d Cir.2003) (per curiam); *see also Zhang v. INS,*386 F.3d 66, 71 (2d Cir.2004) (“Because [asylum and withholding] relief are factually related but with a heavier burden for withholding, it follows that an applicant who fails to establish his eligibility for asylum necessarily fails to establish eligibility for withholding.”). Likewise, the IJ’s denial of CAT relief for the petitioners also satisfied the substantial evidence standard. *See Wang v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 130, 144 n. 20 (2d Cir.2003).

We have considered all of the petitioners’ claims and find them to be without merit. The petitions for review are therefore DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James G. Thomasch, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) [Not Applicable];

 

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 13, 2005 |  /s/ James G. Thomasch   |
|--------------------|-------------------------------|
|               |  James G. Thomasch       |
|               |  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### State v. Kupahu

26580, 26586

02/01/2007

Denied

112 Hawai'i 278, 145 P.3d 821
#### Eduardo DeLaGARZA; et al, Plaintiffs Eduardo DeLaGarza, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-20693.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 13, 2005.

Afton Jane Izen, Bellaire, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

David C. Belt, U.S. Postal Service, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. *See*5th Cir. R. 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


        CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Each of, Matthew H. O'Toole, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert A.
Desrosiers, Chief Financial Officer, of The Hockey Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

     (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *


       CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

       /s/ Matthew H. O'Toole                      /s/ Robert A. Desrosiers
       ----------------------                      ------------------------
           Matthew H. O'Toole                          Robert A. Desrosiers

   Date:  14 November, 2002                     Date:  14 November, 2002
i>< ^ 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON/DC 

J & B ENTERPRISES, INC., 

d/b/a RHYTHM SHINE, 

Complainant 

V. Docket No. 16-08-07 

METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE 

AIRPORT AUTHORITY, c . 

Respondent. 3^ 

ORDER OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

;:iD 

—i- O 

Although 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 16, Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings is intended to expedite substantially the handling and 

disposition of airport-related complaints. Section 16.11(a) provides that an extension of time 

may be granted where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete hearing of the matters 

before the agency. 

In the foregoing matter, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires additional time 

for a fair and complete hearing of the matter. Accordingly, the FAA's Final Agency Decision 

is extended and now due to be rendered on or before February 16,2010. 

^ Date: /^/'^V^ P 

Fanny Rive^i, 

Assistant Administrator for Civil Rights 

and FAA Diversity Advocate 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 29, 2009,1 caused to be placed in the United States mail 

(first class, postage paid), or personally delivered a true copy of the ORDER OF EXTENSION 

addressed to: 

Arthur P. Berg 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

641 Lexington Ave., Suite 1409 

New York, New York 10022 

Aberg@Kaplan.kirsch.com 

(212)328-9515 

(646) 514-5440 fax 

Thomas J. Henderson 

Henderson Law Firm, PLLC 

1425 K. Street, NW, Suite 350 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 587-5687 

(202) 587-5601 fax 

tjh@hendersonfirm.net 

ni*dbetiJ.Weir, 

Attorney, Airports Law Branch 

Office of the Chief Counsel
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended July 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Steven F. Groth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



September 25, 2007                /s/ Steven F. Groth
------------------                ----------------------------------
Date                              Steven F. Groth
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Senior
                                  Vice President
October 28, 1999

22232

#### State v. Tautolo

Affirmed
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 7/27/15

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Do cket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Julie Rosenberg, EPA

SUBJECT: 7/14/15, Meeting with States Regarding Pro posed Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees li sted below on 7/14/15 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power P lants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Craig Segall, Senior Staff Counsel, California Air Resources Board Martha Rudolph, Director of Environmental Programs, Colorado Department of Public Health

and Environment Jared Snyder, Assistant Commissioner for Air Resour ces, Climate Change and Energy, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tom Burack, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services John Quigley, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director, Georgetown Climat e Center Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager, Georgeto wn Climate Center Lissa Lynch, Institute Associate, Georgetown Climat e Center

EPA Participants: Mark Rupp, DAA, OCIR, EPA Shaun McGrath, RA, EPA Region 8 Joan Card, EPA Region 8 Julie Rosenberg, OAR, EPA
October 17, 2016

US Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M

- 30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. is requesting an extension to the exemption from Title 14 of the

Code of Federal Regulations part 137.53(c)(2). This exemption is based on being in the public’s

best interest to not jettison spray loads over congested areas and the ability to show an

equivale nt level of safety with not installing a jettison system.

Thank you very much for your attention to this. If you need any additional information, or have

any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Autumn Johnson

Aerial Applicator

Dynam ic Aviation Group, Inc.

P.O. Box 7

Bridgewater, VA 22812

Phone: (540) 828

- 6070

Fax: (540) 828

- 4031

ajohnson@dynamicaviation.com
Select agents are biological agents and toxins that have the potential to pose a severe threat to both 

human and animal health, plant health, or to animal and plant products. These materials are regulated 

by the Federal Select Agent Program, under 7 CFR Part 331, 9 CFR Part 121, and 42 CFR Part 73. The 

Federal Select Agent Program will exclude certain materials, such as an attenuated strain of a select 

agent or toxin, that do not pose a severe threat to the public or agriculture from the select agent

requirements. These materials are known as excluded select agents.

APHIS requires that certain excluded select agents – live, killed, or nucleic acids – have a valid OV permit 

for importation into the United States. APHIS also requires an OV permit for interstate (from one state 

or territory to another) transportation of certain live excluded select agents. In all instances, the permit 

applicant or the shipper must verify that the agent is excluded from regulation (listed as excluded on the 

Federal Select Agents Program website or granted a letter of exclusion issued by the Federal Select 

Agent Program).

Agents (species/descriptive name) that may need an OV permit for Import or Transport:

African horse sickness virus 

African swine fever virus

Avian influenza virus (highly pathogenic)

Bacillus anthracis

Bacillus anthracis Pasteur strain

Brucella abortus 

Brucella melitensis 

Brucella suis 

Burkholderia mallei

Burkholderia pseudomallei 

Classical Swine Fever virus* 

Coxiella burnetti

Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus (excluding North American genotypes*) 

Foot and Mouth disease virus*

Francisella tularensis 

Goat pox virus 

Hendra virus

Lumpy skin disease virus
Mycoplasma capricolum subspecies capripneumoniae (contagious caprine pleuropneumonia)

Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides small colony (Mmm SC) (contagious bovine 

pleuropneumonia

Newcastle disease virus (virulent) 

Nipah virus

Peste des petits ruminants virus

reconstructed replication competent forms of 1918 pandemic influenza virus

Rift Valley fever virus 

Rinderpest virus 

Sheep pox virus

Swine vesicular disease virus*

Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus (excluding subtypes IAB and IC*)

*Nucleic acids from these organisms are considered select agents. Movement of select agent nucleic 

acids are regulated through select agent transfer (not through permit). Please see: 

https://www.selectagents.gov/na-regulated.html
19577

#### State v. Villanueva

February 24, 1997

Order No. 97-17

Affirmed
50 P.3d 974

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

June 13, 2002

23875

#### State v. Perry

Affirmed
## Flight Log

Pre-flight inspection ☐ Yes ☐ No Comment Comment: Date: Time: Location:

**Circle Circle**  **Comment** Weather Good Fair Visibility Good Fair Wind Speed Low Medium Proximity to airport: Airport Notified? ☐ Yes ☐ No Date: Time: Phone number: Contact Name: Proximity to medium traffic road: Proximity to heavily traveled roadway road: Proximity to congested population: Approximate flight duration: Safety Concerns:

Additional Comments:

Signature

_______________________
Order entered August 17, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00666-CV

RYAN STANCU, Appellant

V.

SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-14134

ORDER

Although the reporter’s record has not been filed, appellant has filed his 

brief on the merits. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the 

reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant’s brief is deficient in that it fails to include: (1) a table of contents 

with references to the pages of the brief; (2) an index of authorities arranged 

alphabetically and indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited; 

(3) issues presented for review; (4) a statement of facts supported by record 
references; and (5) clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with 

appropriate citations to the record. See id. 38.1(b), (c), (f), (g) & (i). Accordingly 

appellant shall file an amended brief correcting the noted deficiencies within ten 

days of the date of this order. Failure to file an amended brief will result in the 

appeal being submitted with the deficient brief.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Japanese Beetle

Trapping and Visual

2023 Quick Reference

Program: Japanese Beetle

Application: ArcGIS Field Maps

Host: USDA-MRP Enterprise (portal)

Map Title: PPQ JB Trapping and Visual 2023 Field Map

CHECK URL! https://maps.mrp.usda.gov/arcgis/

IMPORTANT!! You must synchronize your map at the beginning/end of each workday.

FOR ALL DATA ENTRY:

1. Open ArcGIS Field Maps. Confirm correct ArcGIS Enterprise URL.

2. Open previously downloaded map area & stand at the point you wish to collect. 

3. Tap the Layers icon & toggle ON the layers you wish to view/edit.

4. Tap the blue plus sign in the lower-right corner of the map to add data.

Map Notes Points

NOTE: These layers are meant to share information or hazards to all surveyors.

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

Select Hazard or Info options.

Complete the data form and tap the Submit button.

Trapping

Place a Trap

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

1. Tap to select “New JB Trap Site 2023”

2. Complete the data form (Verify the Install Date field is Today.)

* Asterisks indicate mandatory fields. 

3. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

Trap Activity

1. Tap the trap symbol on the map to select it. The data form opens on the left.

2. Scroll down and tap "JB Trap Activities 2023" or tap the link icon. 

3. Tap the blue Add button and complete the activities data form. 

Verify the Activity Date field is Today.

4. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

ArcGIS Field Maps 

Mobile Application

USDA APHIS PPQ, USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org

Layers icon

Add data button
Last Updated: 3 April 2023 09:11 2

Relocate a Trap

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

On original trap, record:

1. Trap Activity: “New JB Trap Activities 2023” – Remove > Submit

2. Transport the trap to its new location and perform “Place a Trap” steps as above.

Visual Survey

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

1. Tap to select JB Visual Surveys 2023. 

2. Fill out the main data form. * Asterisks indicate mandatory fields. 

Verify the Survey Date field is Today.

3. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button to save the new survey 

record.

If the Submit button fails, you have not completed all required fields or GPS accuracy failed.

To preserve battery power, put the device to sleep between surveys. 

For more details, refer to the PPQ JB Trapping and Visual 2023 Field Map User Manual.
# C_2019399EN.01010302.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/103

---

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — RATP v Commission

(Case T-250/18) (1)

(2019/C 399/123)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.

---
November 3, 1999

22195

#### State v. Cullen

Vacated in part, Affirmed in part
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 23.




---



##### 



a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Paula J. MeilerPaula J. MeilerSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 24.