alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Martin J. Reid, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Ibis Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))  for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:May 22, 2008

 

 
| /s/ ***Martin J. Reid***               |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Martin J. Reid                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Veterinary Health Certificate for Export of Commercial Birds to the United States of America 

Veterinary Authority Date of Issue Certificate Number 

CERTIFICATION 

This is to certify that the animals described herein conform to the current veterinary import requirements of the United 

States. Health certificates are valid for 30 days from the date of endorsement by the competent authority. 

1. Consignor/Shipper/Owner: 2. Consignee/Broker/Owner:

3. Country of Export: 4. Date of Shipment:

5. Country of Destination:

United States of America

6.State of Destination:

7. Port of Embarkation / Border Crossing: 8. Date of Veterinary Inspection:

9. Means of Transport: 10. Description Of Commodity:

Commercial Birds 

11. Commodities Intended Use:

Commercial 

12. Total Quantity:

13. Total Number of Shipping Containers:
Note: Shipments of birds which consists of 5 or less ar 

“pets” 

Bottom of page intentionally left blank 

Page 1 of 2

Veterinary Health Certificate for Export of Commercial Birds to the United States of 

America

Veterinary Authority Date of Issue Certificate Number 
The issuing /official veterinarian certifies that all birds covered by this certificate have been inspected and 

attests to the following statements: 

1. The veterinarian issuing the certificate completed inspection and testing of the birds covered under this health 

certificate.

2. The bird(s) was/were not vaccinated against any H5 or H7 subtype of avian influenza.

3. The veterinarian issuing the certificate examined the bird(s) within 30 days prior to export, and saw no 

evidence of communicable diseases of poultry.

4. The bird(s) covered by this certificate do not originate from flocks nor had contact with any birds or poultry 

originating in a control zone established by state/provincial/federal animal health authorities due to outbreaks of 

Newcastle disease or Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in the 90 days preceding the exportation.

5. CHOOSE EITHER OPTION A OR B BELOW:

A. The bird(s) was/were not vaccinated against Newcastle disease

OR

B. The bird(s) were vaccinated against Newcastle disease (avian paramyxovirus) at least 21 days prior to 

export, using vaccines that do not contain any velogenic strains of Newcastle disease virus.

Vaccine Name:

Date:

6. The shipment will not transit through any region where APHIS considers highly pathogenic avian influenza to 

exist.

7. Birds must be inspected within 24 hours of export.

8. The birds were placed in new or appropriately sanitized packaging materials at the premises from which the 

birds were to be exported.

 ********************Certificate shall be valid for 30 days from date of issue************************

The official veterinarian must endorse the issuing veterinarian’s signature OR the official veterinarian’s signature and 

government seal is used alone. 

Name of Issuing Veterinarian (Printed) Name of Official Veterinarian (Printed) 

Signature of Issuing Veterinarian Signature of Official Veterinarian 

Date Date 

Page 2 of 2
# C_2018161EN.01004201.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/42

---

Appeal brought on 23 February 2018 by Crédit mutuel Arkéa against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 13 December 2017 in Case T-52/16, Crédit mutuel Arkéa v European Central Bank

(Case C-153/18 P)

(2018/C 161/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Crédit mutuel Arkéa (represented by: H. Savoie, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Central Bank, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the judgment of 13 December 2017 (T-52/16) by which the General Court dismissed Crédit mutuel Arkéa’s application seeking annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank of 4 December 2015 (ECB/SSM/2015 — 9695000CG7B84NLR5984/40) setting the prudential requirements applicable to Groupe Crédit mutual. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of 13 December 2017 (T-52/16) by which the General Court dismissed Crédit mutuel Arkéa’s application seeking annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank of 4 December 2015 (ECB/SSM/2015 — 9695000CG7B84NLR5984/40) setting the prudential requirements applicable to Groupe Crédit mutual.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds, alleging that:

| — | the General Court erred in law when it held that Article 2(21)(c) of the SSM Framework Regulation allowed the ECB to exercise prudential supervision on a consolidated basis in respect of institutions affiliated to a central body despite the fact that that body does not have credit institution status; |
| --- | --- |

—

the General Court erred in law when it held that Article 2(21)(c) of the SSM Framework Regulation allowed the ECB to exercise prudential supervision on a consolidated basis in respect of institutions affiliated to a central body despite the fact that that body does not have credit institution status;

| — | the General Court erred in its legal characterisation of the facts when it held that Crédit mutuel is a supervised group since it meets the criteria set out in Article 10(1) of Regulation No 575/2013. (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

the General Court erred in its legal characterisation of the facts when it held that Crédit mutuel is a supervised group since it meets the criteria set out in Article 10(1) of Regulation No 575/2013. (1)

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1).

1

---
United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

WS Directive 20 20

COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

1. PURPOSE

To ensure that WS employees are in compliance with all Federal laws, as well as
applicable State, and local laws.

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
This directive revises WS Directive 2.210 dated 03/01/04.

3. POLICY

All employees (Federal and non-Federal) are responsible for conducting official duties in
compliance with all Federal laws, and also applicable State, and local laws that do not
directly and substantively conflict with and frustrate WS’ Federal statutory authorities.

In a situation requiring a variance from a State or local law or regulation that does not
directly and substantively conflict with and frustrate WS’ Federal statutory authorities,
either the State or local authority agrees to carry out the action in cooperation with WS or
a written authorization or concurrence must be obtained from the appropriate State or
local authority.

Supervisors shall ensure that all employees are aware of laws applicable to their official
luties.

Deputy Administrator
#### Cheng v. Robaire's, Inc.

18275

7/18/97

Vacated and Remanded
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03519

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 716 

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the 1916 Easter Rising, a seminal 

moment in Ireland’s journey to independence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2016 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. NEAL, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. MURPHY of 

Florida, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. 

MULVANEY, Mr. HIGGINS, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the 1916 Easter 

Rising, a seminal moment in Ireland’s journey to independence. 

Whereas the 100th anniversary of the 1916 Easter Rising 

has a particular resonance in the United States; 

Whereas, from the foundation of the United States, Irish people and the millions of United States citizens of Irish descent have helped to shape its history; 

Whereas, in the words of President John F. Kennedy, ‘‘No 

people ever believed more deeply in the cause of Irish 

freedom than the people of the United States’’; 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 716 IH 

Whereas 5 of the 7 signatories of the 1916 Proclamation of 

Independence spent periods of time in the United States 

that significantly influenced their thinking and actions; 

Whereas the United States is the only foreign country specifically mentioned in the Proclamation; 

Whereas the contemporary ties between the United States 

and Ireland are of extraordinary depth and breadth; 

Whereas continued United States engagement in the Northern Ireland peace process is vital to safeguarding the 

gains made since the Good Friday Agreement; 

Whereas the 100th anniversary of the 1916 Easter Rising offers an opportunity for remembrance, reconciliation, and 

reimagining of the future; 

Whereas, on the 17th and 18th of May 2016, the Taoiseach 

(Prime Minister of Ireland) will visit Washington, DC, 

for events commemorating the 100th anniversary of the 

1916 Easter Rising; and 

Whereas more than 200 other commemorative events will 

take place across the United States to mark the anniversary: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recalls the special ties between Ireland and 

3 the United States, continually sustained and 

4 strengthened throughout the intertwined history of 

5 both countries; 

6 (2) welcomes the program of commemorations 

7 in the United States marking the 100th anniversary 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 716 IH 

1 of Ireland’s 1916 Rising, including the events taking 

2 place in Washington DC; and 

3 (3) recognizes the importance of nurturing and 

4 renewing the unique relationship between the United 

5 States and Ireland and their peoples into the future. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than December 26, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas*                     (Karen Smith, Director, Mergers & Acquisitions) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@dal.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Nicholas Andrew Davis, Midland, Texas;*                     to join the Davis/Maddox Family Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of First West Texas Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of West Texas National Bank, both of Midland, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-27030 Filed 12-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Bradley L. Smith, Senior Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Ameriana Bancorp, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriana Bancorp;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 25, 2005
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

International Services

Last Modified: 

Print

International Services, the overseas arm of APHIS, operates in over 25 countries

around the world to keep agriculture healthy and trade markets open. Our in-country

presence, technical expertise, and skilled diplomacy give us unmatched advantages,

access, and trust abroad to protect animal and plant health back home, which helps

U.S. and global economies thrive.
Learn more about our organization and the authorities under which we work.

Priorities

Facilitating Safe Trade 

Our highly specialized team members are animal and plant health experts and

trained diplomats. Learn how we play a vital role in ensuring the free flow of

agricultural trade.

Learn About APHIS' Role in Trade

Foreign Service 

We have Foreign Service Officers in over 25 countries across the globe who do the

work of APHIS overseas. Day in and day out, we’re on the front line for U.S.

agricultural health.

Learn More About Foreign Service
Trending Topics

African Swine Fever 

Learn how APHIS is working to keep this deadly pig disease out of the United States.

Trade Contacts 

Find contacts for user fees, import permits and requirements, export services,

current trade restrictions, quarantines, inspections, and related topics.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Operational Activities: Gray Wolves

in the Northern Rocky Mountains

Last Modified: 

Print

Since wolves were reintroduced into the Northern Rockies in the mid 1990's, their

populations have increased substantially in ID, MT, and WY and are resulting in

significant livestock predation.

In 2010, the minimum wolf population was estimated at more than 1,650 wolves in

244 packs in the Northern Rocky Mountain distinct population segment (Idaho,

Montana, Wyoming, eastern one-third of Washington and Oregon, and a small

portion of north central Utah.

WS personnel work closely with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the

State wildlife agencies to respond to requests for assistance from livestock

producers, and WS may trap, radio collar, or lethally remove the wolves that are

involved.

Learn More About Wolves and Wolf Management

Wolves and Wolf Management in Idaho
The Idaho WS program plays a crucial role in managing the expanding population of

gray wolves throughout the State. From the initial reintroduction of 35 wolves in

central Idaho during 1995 and 1996, the 2010 minimum year-end population was

estimated at 705 wolves in 87 packs producing a minimum of 189 pups. In addition,

there were 22 border packs counted for Montana, Wyoming and Washington that

established territories overlapping the Idaho State boundary. During 2010, 75 cattle,

148 sheep, 2 horses and 1 domestic bison were classified by Idaho WS as confirmed

wolf kills, and an additional 14 cattle, 30 sheep and 1 livestock guarding dog were

considered probable wolf kills. Idaho WS cooperates with the Idaho Department of

Fish and Game (IDFG) and the Nez Perce Tribe in live-capturing and radio-collaring

wolves to facilitate monitoring. On May 5, 2011, wolves in Idaho were officially

delisted by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and management was turned-over to the

IDFG. To learn more about wolf management in Idaho, please see the IDFG and

Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation (OSC) websites.

Learn More About Wolves and Wolf Management in Idaho

More Information

Lines of Defense - Coping with Predators in the Rocky Mountain Region

How WS Works with Livestock Producers

Protecting Livestock from Predators Factsheets