alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MDAQMD Rule 1113 B-3

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
B-4 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
### MEMORANDUM

TO: Ex parte communications, U.S. Department of Energy

FROM: Timothy Ballo, Earthjustice

DATE: June 18, 2013

RE: Efficiency Advocates’ Ex Parte Communication with DOE on June 11, 2013

Meeting/Teleconference summary

Attendees:

Timothy Ballo

– Earthjustice

Dan Cohen

– DOE

John Cymbalsky

– DOE

Ben Longstreth

– Natural Resources Defense Council

Steve Nadel

– American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy

Roland Risser

– DOE

Robin Roy

– Natural Resources Defense Council

Harvey Sa chs

– American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy

Charlie Stephens

– Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

Issues Discussed:

The attendees identified above met on June 11, 2013, to discuss DOE’s proposed rulemaking to

allow waivers from energy conservation standards for large (>55 gallon) residential electric

storage water heaters used in demand response and thermal energy storage programs (Docket

No. EERE

‐ 2012

‐ BT

‐ STD

‐ 0022). The efficiency advocates expressed concern that the proposed

rule does not meet the Department’s legal obligations and does not provide any analysis of the

impact of allowing waivers. In addition, efficiency advocates specifically addressed the

following:

• The need for DOE to analyze the consumer, energy, and environmental effects of any

proposed waivers;

• The ability of well

‐ controlled “hybrid” (with resistance elements for back

‐ up and/or higher

temperature operation) heat pump water heaters to serve energy t hermal storage applications

without the need for a waiver from energy conservation standards;

• The effectiveness of heat pump water heaters in cold climates; and

• The potential for Congress to take action to address the waiver issue.

In response to a qu estion from the Department, the advocates also suggested possible

benchmarks for a limited waiver program, without conceding that such a program would be

warranted or lawful. To provide a more complete response, the American Council for anEnergy Efficien t Economy is providing with this memo its brief supplemental comments on this

topic and an accompanying spreadsheet.

Finally, the efficiency advocates informed DOE of the possibility that one or more of the

advocates may subsequently file, jointly with ot her interested stakeholders, supplemental

comments recommending further analyses and/or procedural safeguards that would be most

helpful in addressing the commenters’ concerns.
23876

#### State v. McCulloch

Affirmed
- 350 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of Nebraska, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen R. Illingworth , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope v. Department of Motor Vehicles , 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 903 (2022). We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth para

graph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/13/2022 01:06 AM CDT- 351 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350 no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported violation of that statute.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.
Exhibit 10.7 Director Indem Signatories


		
			Exhibit 10.7
		

		
			 
		

		
			ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Schedule of Signatories* to a Director Indemnification Agreement
		

		
			 
		

		
			Mark E. Tomkins
		

		
			Peter L. Cella 
		

		
			William C. Cobb 
		

		
			John B. Corness 
		

		
			Richard P. Fox
		

		
			Laurie Ann Goldman
		

		
			Naren K. Gursahaney 
		

		
			Steven B. Hochhauser (effective June 1, 2018)
		

		
			Stephen J. Sedita
		

		
			Nikhil M. Varty
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			*  Jerri L. DeVard, Robert J. Gillette, Thomas C. Tiller, Jr.,  John Krenicki, Jr., David H. Wasserman, Darren M. Friedman, Sarah Kim and Curtis D. Hecht each previously signed a Director Indemnification Agreement, but they are no longer serving on our Board of Directors.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			The form of Director Indemnification Agreement was filed with the SEC on June 19, 2014 as Exhibit 10.71 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0037

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW DAVID LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 30, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2024

09/24/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0037
Before DALY , BROWN , and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Aaron C

. HAMILTON Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 2024000 34

_________________________
Decided: 19 July 202 4
Appeal from the United States Na vy
- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges : A dam J. Workman
Sentence adjudged 3 October 2023 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , North Carolina , consisting of amilitary judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E

- 1, confinement for five months, and a bad

- conduct discharge. 1
For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Gregory P. Adams
, USMCR

1 Appellant received 147 days of confinement credit.United States v. Hamilton , NMCCA No. 202400 0 34 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings a nd sentence are correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Cour t

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
EXHIBIT 10.3

[GENAERA LETTERHEAD]

May 27, 2008

Leanne M. Kelly

c/o Genaera Corporation

5110 Campus Drive

Plymouth Meeting, PA

19462

Dear Leanne:

In conjunction with
Genaeras decision to implement initiatives designed to conserve cash into mid-2009, we have discussed and you have agreed, intending to be legally bound, to the following:



| |  |  | A voluntary 10% reduction in base compensation. As such, effective June 1, 2008, your base salary will be $16,500.00 per month ($198,000/year); and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | A voluntary forfeiture of cash incentives, including salary increases and discretionary bonus awards, for 2008.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please indicate your agreement with these changes by signing in the space provided below.



|          |  |                     |  |  |  |       |  |                                      
|--------- |  | ------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -------------------------------------
|          |  |                     |  |  |  |       |  | Sincerely,                           
|          |  |                     |  | 
|          |  |                     |  |  |  |       |  | /s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.           
|          |  |                     |  |  |  |       |  | John L. Armstrong, Jr.               
|          |  |                     |  |  |  |       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|JLA/jlb   |  |                     |  |  |  |       |  |                                      
|          |  |                     |  | 
|Accepted: |  | /s/ Leanne M. Kelly |  |  |  | Date: |  | May 28, 2008
#### State v. Welling.

25994

12/30/2005

Affirmed
H. Res. 101 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 12, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 644) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend and expand the charitable deduction for contributions of 

food inventory. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 

Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature 

of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee 

Print 114–5 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
2 

•HRES 101 EH 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 636) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend increased expensing limitations, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute 

consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 114–6 shall 

be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 

bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
SERVED FEBRUARY 24, 2011 ir R^RjyENT OF 

-\^;SP0RW10^I 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION';Ei OPERATIONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC /Oil Fc8 ?U P 2^ 28 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WESTMARK INDUSTRIES, INC, 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP06NM0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2006-26338 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2006NM700095) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

/ 

Ronnie A. Yodpf 

Chief Administrative/Law i«9ge 

Attachment - Service List 
j - i •// / 

FAA Docket No. #00^000 8 

HJ^f.1if^r <Civil Penalty Actlbh) 

G^eaiAfi^fiasis COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. i - -..^ ,: g/ ^'-' 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Ci ^ ^^W*^^l|fe/^ C A ' 

Wilbur Wright B]4Sm*^^^^Oo6 ^ 

Michael Offer, Owner 

Westmark Industries, Respondent 

6701 S.W. McEwan Road 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035-7815 ' 

TEL: 503-620-0945 

FAX: 503-639-6749 

Carey W. Terasaki, Complainant'^ O0» 

Northwest Mountain Region, AJSnil-7 

Federal Aviation Administration ^ ' 

»1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98055-4099 

TEL: 425-227-2591 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

• i-^fs-o ^n<''<-i'/v 

The Honorable Richard C. Good\^n,. 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. | 

East Building Ground Floor, Rooii ^ 

Washington, DC 20590 ] 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assislint 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

&Ltm> Judge 

'mn 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. FoTsem<x^pemnm,^mfif)^^itoi<!(miQt,\mlbctoik>y^ 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndQieAdenqsMlf^pMts, $, W-, Wilbur Wri ^ BuiMi(i?^uite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attentiln: Jie»^]D#c«t Oe* . AGC-430.
[Cite as State v. Hines , 2022

- Ohio

- 684.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO, :

Plaintiff

- Appell ee , :
No. 1 10159

v. :

ANTWON M. HINES

, :

Defendant

- Appell ant. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 10, 2022

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Case No. CR

- 20

- 650683

- A

Appearances:

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sarah J. Denney

, Ass istant Prosecuting
Attorney

, for a

ppellee

.

Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender

, and Robert B. McCaleb, Assistant Public Defender, for

a ppellant

.

LI SA B. FORBES

, J.:

I. Facts and Procedural History

On October 7, 2020, Antwon M. Hines (“Hines”) pled guilty to

attempted aggravated robbery, a second

- degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2923.02and 2911.01(A)(1), with a one

- year firearm specification. On November 18, 2020,

the court sentenced Hines to tw o

- to

- three years in prison for the attempted

aggravated robbery under the Reagan Tokes Law and one year in prison for the

firearm specification to run consecutively.

It is from this sentence that Hines appeals, arguing that the Reagan

Tokes Law is unconsti tutional because it violates the right to trial by jury, the

separation

- of

- powers doctrine, and the right to due process.

II. L aw and Analysis

Hine s ’s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court’s en

banc decision in State v. Delvallie , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022

- Ohio

- 470.

Judgment affirmed.

It is ordered that appell ee recover from appell ant costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mand ate issue out of this court directing the

common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27

of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

LISA B. FORBES , JUDGE

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, A .J ., and

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER , J ., CONCUR

N.B. Th e author of this opinion is constrained to apply Delvallie

. For a full explanation

, see State v. Delvallie , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022

- Ohio

- 470 (Forbes, J., dissenting).
Annex 18

CHAPTER X.Y.INFECTION WITH *LEISHMANIA* SPP. (LEISHMANIOSIS)

Article X.Y.1.

General provisions

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, *~~infection~~*~~with *Leishmania spp.*~~leishmaniosis is defined as an *infection* of dogs and cats**by protozoan parasites of the genus *Leishmania*, family *Trypanosomatidae*,**order *Kinetoplastida*.

The *infection* is usually transmitted by the bite of an infected *~~Phlebotomus~~*~~sandfly~~phlebotomine sand fly belonging to the genera *Phlebotomus* (Old World) or *Lutzomyia* (New World).

The following defines the occurrence of*infection* with *Leishmania*spp.: 

1) *Leishmania*spp. amastigotes have been observed and identified as such in a sample~~s~~ from a dog or a cat; or

2) nucleic acid specific to *Leishmania*spp.**has been detected in a sample from a dog or a cat showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with infection with *Leishmania*spp., or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*, or giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with *Leishmania*spp.;**or

3) antibodies specific to *Leishmania*spp.**that are not the consequence of *vaccination* have been detected in a sample from a dog or a cat showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with infection with *Leishmania*spp., or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*, or giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with *Leishmania*spp.

Standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*.

___________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*1

*OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2022*
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Louis R. Tomasetta, the Chief Executive Officer and Eugene F. Hovanec, the Chief Financial
Officer of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | February 13, 2004
|----- | -----------------



|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LOUIS R. TOMASETTA                                                                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                               
|                                                                                                                  
|/s/    EUGENE F. HOVANEC                                                                                          
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



Section 906 Certification of Chief
Executive Officer



I, Joel P. Moskowitz, Chief Executive
Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 16, 2005



/s/    JOEL P.
MOSKOWITZJoel P. MoskowitzChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 564 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 564

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the symbols 
 and traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who 
                          celebrate Christmas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2015

Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Mr. Forbes, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
     Miller of Florida, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Flores, Mr. Fleming, Mr. 
Huelskamp, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Walker, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Babin, Mr. 
Grothman, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Zinke, Mr. 
 Walberg, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
LaMalfa, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Cole, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Barr, 
 Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Rokita, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. 
Harper, Mr. Allen, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, and Mr. Yoho) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the symbols 
 and traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who 
                          celebrate Christmas.

Whereas Christmas is a national holiday celebrated on December 25; and
Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment of the Constitution, in 
        prohibiting the establishment of religion, would not prohibit any 
        mention of religion or reference to God in civic dialog: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
    (1) recognizes the importance of the symbols and traditions of 
Christmas;
    (2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban references to 
Christmas; and
    (3) expresses support for the use of these symbols and traditions 
by those who celebrate Christmas.
                                 <all>
```
19400

#### State v. Mahaulu

February 20, 1997

Order No. 97-15

Vacated in part, Granted in part
# C_2019139EN.01005702.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/57

---

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — eSlovensko Bratislava v Commission

(Case T-460/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public procurement - Set-off of claims - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 139/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: eSlovensko Bratislava (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: B. Fridrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Verheecke, J. Estrada de Solà and F. van den Berghe, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision contained in the Commission’s letter of 22 June 2018 seeking to recover the sum of EUR 229 711.16 by way of set-off of the payment to be made by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) to the applicant against a claim of the Commission in respect of eSlovensko.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 17.9.2018.

---