alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 735 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 18, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for further consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4909) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 

year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 

SEC. 2. (a) No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution and 

amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this resolution. 

(b) Each further amendment printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules shall be considered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 
2 

•HRES 735 EH 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. 

(c) All points of order against the further amendments 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules or amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this resolution are 

waived. 

SEC. 3. It shall be in order at any time for the chair of 

the Committee on Armed Services or his designee to offer 

amendments en bloc consisting of amendments printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution not earlier disposed of. Amendments en bloc offered pursuant to this section shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Armed Services or their designees, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. 

SEC. 4. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment pursuant to this resolution the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such further 

amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amend-
3 

•HRES 735 EH 

ments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 437 

Designating September 2015 as ‘‘Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. COHEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2015 as ‘‘Pulmonary Fibrosis 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas pulmonary fibrosis is a debilitating and ultimately 

fatal condition that causes progressive scarring in the 

lungs and generally has no known definitive cause; 

Whereas, as many as 200,000 individuals in the United 

States are known to suffer from pulmonary fibrosis, the 

majority of whom are between the ages of 50 and 75; 

Whereas the average survival rate for the idiopathic form of 

pulmonary fibrosis is just 2.8 years and up to 80 percent 

of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients die within 5 

years of diagnosis; 

Whereas pulmonary fibrosis takes the lives of 40,000 individuals in the United States each year, approximately 1 

death every 13 minutes; 


ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 437 IH 

Whereas many patients with pulmonary fibrosis are 

misdiagnosed for 1 year or longer after the patients are 

presenting with pulmonary fibrosis symptoms; 

Whereas, as of September 2015, there are no biomarkers for 

screening and testing for pulmonary fibrosis; 

Whereas a cure or drug to extend life or improve symptoms 

of pulmonary fibrosis does not exist; 

Whereas the symptoms of pulmonary fibrosis vary from person to person and include shortness of breath, a dry 

cough, fatigue, weight loss, and aching muscles and 

joints; 

Whereas volunteers, researchers, caregivers, and medical professionals are working to improve the quality of life for 

individuals with pulmonary fibrosis and the families of 

those individuals; 

Whereas developing more effective treatments for pulmonary 

fibrosis and providing access to quality care to individuals 

with pulmonary fibrosis requires increased research, education, and community support services; and 

Whereas September 2015 would be an appropriate month to 

designate as ‘‘Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Month’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Pulmonary Fi3 brosis Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Pul5 monary Fibrosis Awareness Month’’; 

6 (3) continues to support more robust and accel7 erated research to develop more effective treatments 


ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 437 IH 

1 for pulmonary fibrosis and to ultimately find a cure 

2 for the disease; 

3 (4) recognizes the courage and contributions of 

4 individuals with pulmonary fibrosis who participate 

5 in vital clinical trials to advance the knowledge of 

6 the disease; and 

7 (5) commends the dedication of organizations, 

8 volunteers, researchers, and millions of individuals in 

9 the United States and abroad working to improve 

10 the quality of life for individuals with pulmonary fi11 brosis and the families of those individuals. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 -------------------------
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with  the Annual Report  of American  HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as  filed
 with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
 "Report"), I  John C.  Stuecheli, Chief  Financial Officer  of the  Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as  adopted pursuant to S 906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with  the requirements of Section  13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained  in the Report  fairly presents, in  all
 material respects, the financial condition and  result of operations of  the
 Company.


 /s/ John C. Stuecheli
 -----------------------
 John C. Stuecheli
 Chief Financial Officer
 January 14, 2003
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00012

- CV

IN RE: FREESTONE UNDERGROUND STORAGE, INC., RAY FUNDERBURK, AND NANCY FUNDERBURK

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O RDER

On February 3, 2014, Freestone Underground Storage, Inc., Ray Funderburk

, and Nancy

Funderburk, Relators, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Contemporaneously

, Relators filed

a motion requesting that this Court stay any and all underlying proceedings pending this Court’s

ruling on the petition for writ of mandamus.

After reviewing the petition and the motion for tempora ry relief, this Court is of the

opinion that the temporary relief requested should be granted and that all proceedings and

activities in the trial court should be stayed pending this Court’s ruling on the mandamus

petition.

Now, therefore, it is ordered t hat all proceedings and activities concerning cause number

2013

- 290 in the 123rd Judicial District Court of Panola County, Texas, are stayed pending this

Court’s determination of Relator s ’ petition for writ of mandamus.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COU RT

Date: February 19, 2014
# C_2021263EN.01001401.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

(Case T-218/18) (1)

(State aid - Aviation sector - Operational aid granted by Germany to Frankfurt-Hahn airport - Decision not to raise objections - Action for annulment - Status as an interested party - Safeguard of procedural rights - Admissibility - Guidelines on aid in the aviation sector - Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market - Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Serious difficulties)

(2021/C 263/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, T. Maxian Rusche and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, R. Kanitz, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), Land Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) (represented by: R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 5289 final of 31 July 2017, on State aid SA.47969 (2017/N) implemented by Germany concerning operating aid granted to Frankfurt-Hahn airport.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2017) 5289 final of 31 July 2017, on State aid SA.47969 (2017/N) implemented by Germany concerning operating aid granted to Frankfurt-Hahn airport; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2017) 5289 final of 31 July 2017, on State aid SA.47969 (2017/N) implemented by Germany concerning operating aid granted to Frankfurt-Hahn airport;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs and bear those incurred by Deutsche Lufthansa AG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs and bear those incurred by Deutsche Lufthansa AG;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Land Rheinland-Pfalz to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Land Rheinland-Pfalz to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
# C_2019122EN.01003202.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/32

---

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Lillelam v EUIPO — Pfaff (LITTLE LAMB)

(Case T-18/18) (1)

(2019/C 122/38)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.

---
Exhibit
21.1. Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The
Company has seven wholly-owned subsidiaries. All others listed are either direct or
indirect subsidiaries of the Bank.

|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY      | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|-------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Mid America Bank, fsb            |                       
|MAF Bancorp Capital Trust I      |                       
|MAF Bancorp Capital Trust II     |                       
|MAF Developments, Inc.           |                       
|Mid Town Development Corporation |                       
|Equitable Finance Corp.          |                       
|Computer Dynamics Group, Inc.    |                       

|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE BANK               | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|-------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Mid America Investment Services, Inc.  |                       
|Mid America Insurance Agency, Inc.     |                       
|N.W. Financial Corporation             |                       
|Randall Road Development Corporation   |                       
|Centre Point Title Services, Inc.      |                       
|Reigate Woods Development Corporation  |                       
|MAF Realty Co., L.L.C. - III           |                       
|MAF Realty Co., L.L.C. - IV            |                       
|Mid America Re, Inc.                   |                       
|EFS Service Corporation                |                       
|EFS Financial Services, Inc.           |                       
|SF Investment Corporation              |                       
|SF Insurance Services Corporation      |                       
|St. Francis Equity Properties, Inc.(1) |                       
|Center Point Mortgage, Inc.            |                       

---

| | (1) | St. Francis Equity Properties, Inc. is a 98%
or 99% partner or member in 13 individual limited liability partnerships or limited liability companies, each which invests
in an affordable housing property within the State of Wisconsin.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2019182EN.01000201.xml

| 27.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 22 August 2018 — DP, Finanzamt Linz

(Case C-545/18)

(2019/C 182/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: DP, Finanzamt Linz

Defendant authorities: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Braunau am Inn, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land

Interested parties: Finanzamt Braunau-Ried-Schärding, EO

The Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) held in its order of 4 April 2019 that the request for a preliminary ruling referred by decision of the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich dated 16 August 2018 is manifestly inadmissible.

---
# C_2018381EN.01000701.xml

| 22.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 27 July 2018 — Openbaar Ministerie v TC

(Case C-492/18)

(2018/C 381/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Defendant: TC

Question referred

In a case in which:

| — | the executing Member State has transposed Article 17 of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) in such a way that the detention pending surrender of the requested person must in all cases be suspended once the 90-day period for taking a final decision on the execution of the European arrest warrant has expired and |
| --- | --- |

—

the executing Member State has transposed Article 17 of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) in such a way that the detention pending surrender of the requested person must in all cases be suspended once the 90-day period for taking a final decision on the execution of the European arrest warrant has expired and

| — | the courts of that Member State have interpreted domestic law as meaning that the decision period is suspended as soon as the executing judicial authority decides to refer a question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling or to await the reply to a question referred for a preliminary ruling by another executing judicial authority or to postpone the decision on surrender owing to a real danger of inhuman or degrading detention conditions in the issuing Member State, |
| --- | --- |

—

the courts of that Member State have interpreted domestic law as meaning that the decision period is suspended as soon as the executing judicial authority decides to refer a question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling or to await the reply to a question referred for a preliminary ruling by another executing judicial authority or to postpone the decision on surrender owing to a real danger of inhuman or degrading detention conditions in the issuing Member State,

does the maintenance of the detention pending surrender of a requested person who represents a flight risk once that detention has continued for more than 90 days after that person’s arrest contravene Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

---
EXHIBIT 23.1


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 The Board of Directors
 American Healthchoice, Inc.

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
 December 2, 2005, into the following registration statements filed by you on
 Form S-8: File No.  333-36475 dated September 29,  1997; File No.  333-35581
 dated September 18, 1997; File No. 333-26061 dated April 30, 1997; File  No.
 333-26065 dated April  30, 1997; File  No. 333-26043 dated  April 30,  1997;
 File No.  333-26063  dated  April 30,  1997  and  File  No.333-122958  dated
 February 23, 2005


 Lane Gorman Trubitt, L.L.P.
 Dallas, Texas
 January 13, 2006
#### State v. Rideout

16094, 16095

9/22/94

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2004 (the Report). I, David Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I,
John Miley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer/s/ JOHN A. MILEYExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies
this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0686

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM006AD

747-53A2610 ---5/10/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
March 4, 2004

24999

#### State v. Kwon

Affirmed
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVIII

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

Article 175

(ex Article 159 TEC)

(ex Article 159 TEC)

Member States shall conduct their economic policies and shall coordinate them in such a way as, in addition, to attain the objectives set out in Article 174. The formulation and implementation of the Union's policies and actions and the implementation of the internal market shall take into account the objectives set out in Article 174 and shall contribute to their achievement. The Union shall also support the achievement of these objectives by the action it takes through the Structural Funds (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section; European Social Fund; European Regional Development Fund), the European Investment Bank and the other existing Financial Instruments.

The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions every three years on the progress made towards achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion and on the manner in which the various means provided for in this Article have contributed to it. This report shall, if necessary, be accompanied by appropriate proposals.

If specific actions prove necessary outside the Funds and without prejudice to the measures decided upon within the framework of the other Union policies, such actions may be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

---
# C_2018373EN.01000702.xml

| 15.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 19 July 2018 — ER v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria

(Case C-472/18)

(2018/C 373/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: ER

Respondent: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria

Question referred

Are a provision in a collective agreement and an employer’s practice, pursuant to which, for the purposes of remuneration and promotion, the length of service of a part-time female employee whose working hours are ‘distributed vertically’ over the whole year is to be calculated solely on the basis of time actually worked, contrary to Clause 4(1) and (2) of the Framework Agreement on part-time work [annexed to] Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997, (1) and to Articles 2(1)(b) and 14(1) of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)? (2)

---

(1)  Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1998 L 14, p. 9).

(2)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).

---
October 18, 2005

26164

#### State v. Davis

Affirmed