alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (197)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,370
<PP&E>                                         113,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,344)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,449
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,393
<SALES>                                         25,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,157
<CGS>                                           10,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       121
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
# C_2021035EN.01001801.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/18

---

Appeal brought on 12 July 2018 by Oliver Spieker against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 8 May 2018 in Case T-92/18, Oliver Spieker v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-455/18 P)

(2021/C 35/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Oliver Spieker (represented by: A. Schönfleisch, O. Spieker, M. Alber and N. Willich, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 May 2018 in Case T-92/18, Spieker v EUIPO (Science for a better skin), by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2017 (R 1067/2017-4) which had dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the EUIPO examiner of 20 March 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 May 2018 in Case T-92/18, Spieker v EUIPO (Science for a better skin), by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2017 (R 1067/2017-4) which had dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the EUIPO examiner of 20 March 2017;

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2017 (R 1067/2017-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2017 (R 1067/2017-4);

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those necessarily incurred by the appellant before the Fourth Board of Appeal and the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those necessarily incurred by the appellant before the Fourth Board of Appeal and the General Court of the European Union.

By order of 8 December 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the unsuccessful party to pay the costs.

---
**EXHIBIT31.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark R. Tauscher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC SystemsInc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) [Not Applicable];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
19214

#### Wolfberg v. Roberts

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 11 (Unaudited)

COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     BASIC                       DILUTED
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                              -------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
                                               2000           1999        2000           1999
                                              -----          ------      ------         ------

Net income                                   $2,334,160   $  605,328   $2,334,160   $  605,328
                                              =========    =========    =========    =========
Weighted average common
shares outstanding                            5,925,045    5,957,470    5,925,045    5,957,470
                                              =========    =========

Weighted average common
share equivalents:
      Options                                         -            -      633,406      776,670
                                                                        ---------    ---------
Weighted average common
    shares and common share
    equivalents                               5,925,045    5,957,470    6,558,451    6,734,140
                                              =========    ==========   =========    =========


Net income per share                         $      .39   $      .10   $      .36   $      .09
                                              =========    ==========   =========    =========

</TABLE>

                                       14
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the filing by Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “company”) of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the
“Report”) I, Joseph C. Hayden, Principal Executive Officer of the company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the company.




This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
principal executive officer of Applied Energetics, Inc. with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other
purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Applied Energetics, Inc. and will be retained by Applied
Energetics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





/s/ Joseph C.
      HaydenJoseph
      C. HaydenPresident,
      Chief Operating Officer and Principal Executive OfficerDate:
      August 9, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED MARCH 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       266
<INVENTORY>                                     10,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,198
<PP&E>                                          44,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 647,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,275
<BONDS>                                        497,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   647,930
<SALES>                                        307,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,684
<CGS>                                          237,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 77 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 3, 2015. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Welch and Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New 

Mexico. 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY: 

Mr. Perlmutter and Mr. Tonko. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Adams. 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Walz and Mr. 

McNerney. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2018436EN.01002301.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH v Hauptzollamt Lörrach

(Case C-559/18)

(2018/C 436/31)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Lörrach

Question referred

Is the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1218/2012 [of the European Parliament and of the Council] of 12 December 2012 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that static converters such as those in the present case are to be classified under subheading 8504 4030 only if they are used principally with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof, or is it sufficient, for the purpose of satisfying the characteristic ‘of a kind used’, if the converters can also, in view of their objective characteristics, be used with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof, in addition to other applications?

---

(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 36.

---
# C_2018190EN.01001101.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) — lodged on 19 March 2018 — Raúl Vítor Soares de Sousa v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-196/18)

(2018/C 190/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Raúl Vítor Soares de Sousa

Applicant:

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does EU law, and Article 110 TFEU in particular, preclude a tax provision such as Article 2(1)(a) and (b) of the URT [(Unitary Road Tax)] Code from imposing a higher tax charge on vehicles of the same make, model, fuel type and age on the ground that they were first registered in other Member States?

---
#### State v. Aki

17731

4/18/95

Affirmed
# C_2021462EN.01003502.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Altice Europe v Commission

(Case T-425/18) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - Telecommunications sector - Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised - Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Principle of legality - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Gravity of the infringements - Implementation of the infringements - Exchange of information - Amount of fines - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2021/C 462/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Altice Europe NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: R. Allendesalazar Corcho and H. Brokelmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Farley and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Petrova and O. Segnana, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking, primarily, annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 2418 final of 24 April 2018 imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration in breach of Article 4(1) and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Case M.7993 — Altice/PT Portugal), and, in the alternative, annulment or reduction of the fines imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Altice Europe NV by Article 4 of European Commission Decision C(2018) 2418 final of 24 April 2018 imposing a fine for putting into effect a concentration in breach of Article 4(1) and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Case M.7993 — Altice/PT Portugal) for infringement of Article 4(1) of that regulation at EUR 56 025 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Altice Europe NV by Article 4 of European Commission Decision C(2018) 2418 final of 24 April 2018 imposing a fine for putting into effect a concentration in breach of Article 4(1) and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Case M.7993 — Altice/PT Portugal) for infringement of Article 4(1) of that regulation at EUR 56 025 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Altice Europe to bear its own costs and to pay four fifths of the costs of the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Altice Europe to bear its own costs and to pay four fifths of the costs of the Commission;

| 4. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.

---
GARY M. RlDU:Y

Secretary of Transportation

MARY FALLIN

Governor

STATE OF OKLAHOMA

July 22, 2013

Brooke chapman, Associate Director

Small Community Air Service Development Program

U. S. Department of Transportati on

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE W86-31 0

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Ms. Chapman.

Air Service is vitally important to the economic wellbeing of business in the Southwest Region

of the state of Oklahoma. Regional business growth and sustainment depends, in part, on the

ability to meet the air travel needs of existing local businesses and institutions as well as

companies considering Lawton as a location for their operations. As a Metropolitan Statistical

Area (MSA) with a population of 124,089 as identified in the 2010 census, Lawton has the

population needed to support good commercial air service. Retaining this commercial air service

is critical to not only their local economy, but to the state as well. The proposed plan will do this

by supporting scheduled service and finding new ways to market and advertise .the service to the

local community.

The cost of driving to alternate airports results in lost productivity and increases the cost of

travel. In the world of business, time is money. Lost time in driving another hour or two to the

nearest airport can "t be recovered. The proposed air service marketing initiative is an important

step in the right direction to keep commercial air service in Lawton.

\Ve are pleased to have the opportunity to support the grant application, and assure you that we

will work diligently with airport administration to insure the long-term success of air service in

the Lawton community.

Sincerely,

~J~~ -

~:~:Z~TranSpO<1~

35{)O MARTIN LUTHER KING AVENUE, P. O. BOX 11357· OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73136·0357. 405-425.}6O]
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 7, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
132 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-99, CP2024-102.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-27410 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P