alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THEMATTER OF: 

# RECEIVED JUN 0 12016
u.s. DEPARTMENT oF TRANSPORTATioN-lEAR

## lNG DOCKET OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASIDNGTON, D.C.

COMPASS SYSTEMS & SALES, INC. ) FAA CASENO. 2014-GL-70-0239 ) FDMS No. FAA-2015-2440 Respondent. ) ) JUDGE J.E. SULLIVAN 

### ) ) STIPULATED NOTICE. ) OF COMPROMISE Now come the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"), and the Respondent, Compass Systems & Sales, lnc. ("Compass"), by and through legal counsel, and hereby give notice that the parties have entered into an agreement ofcompromise and resolution with respect to each and every alleged violation, penalty and other matter contained in the Complaint filed by the FAA against Compass on or about July 27, 2015 in the above-captioned matter. By their execution of a Settlement Agreement dated April 5, 2016, and without admitting fault or liability, the parties have stipulated to an Order Assessing Civil Penalty in this matter, with Compass agreeingto pay the sums specified therein and waiving all rights to appeal such Order, infull and final resolutionthis matter. The FAA hereby voluntarily withdraws the Complaint pursuant to 14 CPR 13.215. Accordingly, the parties hereby request that this Honorable Court dismiss these proceedings with prejl1dice.

# l,,'

**-~ R~podM!y** **Sub-~**

# M------.__

StuartA



### Strasfeld~n3'99} 

### ·· ············· · -B-tian--'
.......,

... l"'c"-: Kh---c
...an-·····---,; 

### Ec-'s_q_
..

# ----= Louis P. Alexander, Jr., Esq. (Ohio #0076529) Attorney Roth, Blair, Roberts, Strasfeld & 

### Lodge, L.P.A. Federal Aviation Administration 100 EastFederal Street, Suite 600 2300 East DevonAvenue, AGL-7H Youngstown, Ohio 44503 Des Plaines, Illinois 60018 Telephone: (330) 744-5211 Phone: 847-294-7652 Facsimile: (330) 744-3184 Fax: 847-294-7498 Email: sstrasfeld@roth-blair.com lalexander@roth-blair.com Counsel for Complainant FederalAviationAdministration AttorneysforRespondent, Compass Systems & Sales, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Stipulated Entry were sent via Overnight Mail



## this-~5 day ofApril,1ot6, to the following address for filing with the Federal Aviation Administration: Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Wilbur Wright Building- Suite2Wl000 Washington D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430


### I HEREBY CERTIFYthat a true and accurate copy ofthe foregoing StipulatedEntry was



### . . . ········ .. ic'-17 served uponthe following via Overnight Mail this-56_ 

### day of?'l:prit; 2016. Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrate LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590STUART A. STRASFELD (Ohio #0012399) LOUIS P. ALEXANDER, JR. (Ohio #0076529) Attorneys for Respondent Compass Systems & Sales, Inc.
10512

#### Porphyris v. Estate of Porferis

Dismissed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 84 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 84

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

    Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. Levin) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $17,715,290 for the One Hundred 
Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,857,645 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $8,857,645 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of E Com Ventures,  Inc. (the "Company")
of Form 10-Q for the period  ending April 29, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, A. Mark Young,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                     By: By: /S/ A. Mark Young
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         A. Mark Young
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         June 9, 2006
P--p'l!~ S10-100331-004 

CONTROL NO 

Harrisburg International Airport 

Timothy J. Edwards 

Executive Director 

March 15,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Ul 

. Washington,DC 2059.0 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf ofthe Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority, I am writing to express 

our strong support for the Delta Air Lines application for new nonstop service between 

Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many 

corporations have a strong trade and market presence with Japan. With five daily flights 

between MDT and Detroit Metro Airport, our businesses would benefit from convenient 

connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport. Our community, too, would enjoy the enhanced 

relationship building benefit that would result should this application be granted. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia. This summer Delta is adding new 


service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW 


it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition of Haneda as a destination is 


would clearly benefit our business travelers. 


Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

"""Tn" J~ Edwards, 

Executive Director 

One Terminal Drive - Suite 300 - Middletown, PA 17057 

(717) 948-3900 	- Fax (717) 9484636 - 1-888-HIAJETS 

.. JlU""/ TIy- -=:;iiiI!";com
# C_2019399EN.01005201.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — XI v Commission

(Case T-528/18) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Occupational disease - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Reply to the complaint containing medical data - Medical confidentiality - Request for deletion of that data - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Right to privacy - Liability)

(2019/C 399/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: XI (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the Commission’s decision of 25 May 2018 (Case R/56/18), rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance, based on Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, secondly, compensation for the harm which the applicant allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay XI the sum of EUR 2 500; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay XI the sum of EUR 2 500;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.

---
#### State v. Higa

15438

3/24/92

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2019187EN.01007701.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/77

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — Objectif Pharma (WS wellpharma shop)

(Case T-403/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark WS wellpharma shop - Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 187/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Pharmadom (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: M.-P. Dauquaire, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Pétrequin and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Objectif Pharma (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France) (represented by: A. Nappey, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2018 (Case R 1448/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Pharmadom and Objectif Pharma.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pharmadom to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pharmadom to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-06-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-10-1998
<CASH>                                           9,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    312,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               425,021
<PP&E>                                         263,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,094,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,004
<BONDS>                                        755,997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           682
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,094,947
<SALES>                                        960,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               960,217
<CGS>                                          588,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  588,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,085
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             76,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94
        



</TABLE>
H. Res. 555 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2015. 

Resolved, That the following named member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Renacci. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               GENAERA CORPORATION

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy C. Levitt, M.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Roy C. Levitt
-----------------
Roy C. Levitt, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003
# C_2021471EN.01003802.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — TUIfly v Commission

(Case T-619/18) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure for the review of State aid - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Overriding public interest)

(2021/C 471/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: TUIfly GmbH (Langenhagen, Germany) (represented by: L. Giesberts and M. Gayger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 5432 final of 3 August 2018 refusing to grant the applicant access to documents relating to the administrative procedure concerning State aid SA.24221(2011/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by Austria for the Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using the airport.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders TUIfly GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders TUIfly GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Second Amendment”) is made this 15th day of December, 2016, effective as of
January 1, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), by and between PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and NEIL E. WALKOFF, an individual (“Executive”), with respect to the
following facts and circumstances: 
 RECITALS 

The Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on October 13, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), with Executive
having a base salary of Five Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($525,000) per year. 
 On December 21, 2015, effective as of
January 1, 2016, the Company and Executive entered into that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “First Amendment” and, together with the Employment Agreement, the “Agreement”). 

Effective as of January 1, 2017, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to increase Executive’s base salary to Five
Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($575,000) per year. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 AMENDMENT 

1. Effective as of January 1, 2017, Article 3, Section 3.1 of the Agreement (Base Salary) is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following new Article 3, Section 3.1: 
 “3.1 Base Salary. In consideration for Executive’s services
hereunder, the Company shall pay Executive an annual base salary at the rate of Five Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($575,000.00) per year effective as of January 1, 2017 through the end of the Term; payable in accordance with the
Company’s regular payroll schedule from time to time (less any deductions required for Social Security, state, federal and local withholding taxes, and any other authorized or mandated similar withholdings).” 

2. Except as modified herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the
terms of the Agreement and this Second Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall apply. No modification may be made to the Agreement or this Second Amendment except in writing and signed by both the Company and Executive. 

  
 - 1 - 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to be duly as of the
date first written above. 
  

							
	EXECUTIVE	  		  	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
				
	 /s/ Neil E. Walkoff
	  		  	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo

	Neil E. Walkoff	  		  		 	Anthony M. Sanfilippo,
		  		  		 	Chief Executive Officer


  
 - 2 -
Last Updated: 16 April 2021 10:48 1

IPHIS: 4 Steps to Data Entry

**Users should consult survey protocol and management direction to confirm proper data entry techniques.

1. Create (Review) Location*

2. Assign (Review) Location* to Workbook*

3. Create (Review) Site*

4. Create (Review) Activity*

a. Assign Tool Identifier* – Trap ID*

*See the Job Aid titled: IPHIS: Lexicon of Words for definitions.

2021 Disclaimer: Training techniques or workflows held within are designed as basic job aids. Mobile collection tools and technology used are constantly being improved upon. End 

users should consult with management for current workflows and standards.
#### Household Finance Corp.v . Atimua

22368

03/07/2000

Affirmed
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron
Markovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





March 31,
2010




/s/
      Miron MarkovitzMiron
      MarkovitzChief
      Financial
Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11491 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE JAMES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 501

- 3

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Dewayne James has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). James h a s not filed a resp onse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 24 , 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11491 Document: 00514207649 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017No. 16

- 11491

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdra w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-11491 Document: 00514207649 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017