alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 701 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 109
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 701

                          [Report No. 114-530]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4498) to clarify the 
    definition of general solicitation under Federal securities law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2016

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4498) to clarify the 
    definition of general solicitation under Federal securities law.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4498) to clarify the 
definition of general solicitation under Federal securities law. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Financial Services; (2) the amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
offered by the Member designated in the report, which shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as 
read, shall be separately debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 
and shall not be subject to a demand for a division of the question; 
and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 109

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 701

                          [Report No. 114-530]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4498) to clarify the 
    definition of general solicitation under Federal securities law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 26, 2016

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
The State of New Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner

October 20, 2011 Dave Conroy U .S. EPA, Region 1 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Mail Code OEP05-2 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Re: Amendments to Asbestos NESHAP Rule Adjustment Dear Mr . Conroy: By letter dated February 25, 2011, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) requested EPAapproval of amendments to Env-A 1801 - 1807. These rules were previously approved as an adjustment to the Asbestos NESHAP, 40 CFR 61 Subpart M, but were readopted with amendments in 2008. It has come to our attention that no mention was made ofthe public comment and hearing process in either the February 25, 2011 letter or the September 16, 2011 amendment letter . Accordingly, the following summarizes this information. On August 1, 2008, a notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the New Hampshire RuLE1vtAKtNG REGISTER, which is the official publication for rulemaking notices in New

Hampshire. Enclosed are pages fromthat publication announcing the official comment period for Env-A 1800 rulemaking and the hearing date, time, and location. Also on August 1, 2008, a public notice of rulemaking was published in the UNIONLEADER, a statewide daily newspaper. A copy of the certified notice is enclosed. The public hearing was held on September 2, 2008, as noticed in both the RuLEtvtAK1NG REGISTERand UNIONLEADER, and was recorded on audio tape. Acopy of the sign-in sheet is enclosed, showing that 3 members of the public attended the hearing. The only written comments received were fromNancy Barmakian of EPARegion 1 for the Toxics and Pesticides Unit . Please contact me at barbara.hoffmankdes .nh.gov or (603)271-7874 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Barbara L. Hoffman SIP Planning Manager Air Resources Division Enclosures ec : Susan Lancey, EPA Region 1DES Web site : www .des .nh.gov P .O . Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-1370 " Fax: (603) 271-1381 " TDDAccess : Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

s0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

137676

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137676 COA: 286763 Berrien CC: 2007-401079-FH WILLIAM BURRELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 26, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
United States Department of Agriculture 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

 WS Directive 2.105 03/01/04

THE WS INTEGRATED WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

1. PURPOSE 

To summarize the Integrated Wildlife Damage Management (IWDM) 

concept used by USDA/APHIS/WS. 

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS 

This directive revises WS Directive 2.105 dated 06/14/98. 

3. BACKGROUND 

The WS program applies the IWDM (commonly known as Integrated 

Pest Management) approach to reduce wildlife damage. As used and 

recommended by the WS program, IWDM encompasses the integration 

and application of all approved methods of prevention and 

management to reduce wildlife damage. The IWDM approach may 

incorporate cultural practices, habitat modification, animal 

behavior management, local population reduction, or a combination 

of these approaches. The selection of wildlife damage management 

methods and their application must consider the species causing 

the damage and the magnitude, geographic extent, duration, 

frequency, and likelihood of recurring damage. In addition, 

consideration is given to nontarget species, environmental 

conditions and impacts, social and legal factors, and relative 

costs of management options. 

4. POLICY 

WS personnel shall apply and use the IWDM approach to efficiently 

and effectively prevent or reduce damage caused by wildlife. In 

applying IWDM to wildlife damage management, the WS program may 

offer technical assistance, direct control, or a combination of 

both in response to requests for help with wildlife damage 

problems. 

Deputy Administrator
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 769 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 769

Terminating a Select Investigative Panel of the Committee on Energy and 
                               Commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2016

 Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mr. Nadler, Ms. DeGette, Ms. Speier, Ms. 
 DelBene, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Cummings, 
   and Ms. Slaughter) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Terminating a Select Investigative Panel of the Committee on Energy and 
                               Commerce.

    Resolved, That the Select Investigative Panel of the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce established pursuant to House Resolution 461, 
agreed to October 7, 2015, is hereby terminated.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 685 

Recognizing Linemen, the profession of Linemen, and the contributions of 

these brave men and women to protect public safety, and expressing 

support of designation of April 18, 2016, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2016 

Mr. TOM PRICE of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Linemen, the profession of Linemen, and the 

contributions of these brave men and women to protect 

public safety, and expressing support of designation of 

April 18, 2016, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

Whereas the profession of Lineman is steeped in personal, 

family, and professional tradition; 

Whereas Linemen are often first responders during storms 

and other catastrophic events where these brave men and 

women work to make the scene safe for the other public 

safety heroes; 

Whereas Linemen work with thousands of volts of electricity 

high atop power lines 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, 

to keep electricity flowing; 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 685 IH 

Whereas Linemen must often work under dangerous conditions far from their families to construct and maintain 

the Nation’s energy infrastructure; 

Whereas Linemen put their lives on the line every day with 

little recognition or appreciation from the community regarding the danger of their work; and 

Whereas April 18, 2015, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as National Lineman’s Appreciation Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts of Linemen in keeping 

3 the power on and protecting public safety; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of National Line5 man Appreciation Day. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## •
EX PARTE
SHANE MATTHEWNETTLES**Petitioner~Shane** Matthew respectfully request the cause. 

# 83,61-0t WRIT NO. W09-00Z08-P(A)· 

### §**I~** THE**COURT~F'OF** CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### § § § TRAVIS

Grounds I. John 3:20,For everyone praticing wickedness.nhates theLight and does not come to the Light,that his works may not be exposed. II. John 3:21,But the one doing the truth comes to the Light,that his works mayQe revealed,that they exist,having been worked in ELOHIM. , Prayer!: Petitioner respectfully prays that this Court GRANT this motion and order this couse to bear the notation "PUBLISH" Executed on April 27, 2015* ORDER _Respectfully

### Silbm~;~'**/~ ~·~**  Bf: Shane

## nettles/~~ pet1tioner/Movant Pro Se On this* day of ;2015 came on to be heard Motion to Publish and it appears to the Court it should be GRANTED1DENIED.

PRESIDING JUDGE

C/C
#### Ho v. Wu

23804

05/29/2002

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   45,237,356
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  5,816,278
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       5,403,734
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               2,137,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,594,725
<COMMON>                                    19,244,610
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    4,769,183
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         18,075,162
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              42,088,955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         4,645,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             500,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  390,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              10,970,770
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               58,594,725
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   30,869,328
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         4,390,341
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  20,285,534
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     10,583,794
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             750,777
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              11,334,571
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       427,812
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,530,858
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                6,530,858
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     4,618,708
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      427,812
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      10,269,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.70
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Fredricksen

21890

03/07/2000

Affirmed
H. Res. 7 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 6, 2015. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Peterson. 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mrs. Lowey (when 

sworn); Ms. Kaptur; Mr. Visclosky; Mr. Serrano; Ms. 

DeLauro; Mr. Price of North Carolina; Ms. Roybal-Allard; 

Mr. Farr; Mr. Fattah; Mr. Bishop of Georgia; Ms. Lee of 

California; Mr. Schiff; Mr. Honda; Ms. McCollum; Mr. Israel; 

Mr. Ryan of Ohio; Mr. Ruppersberger; Ms. Wasserman 

Schultz; Mr. Cuellar; Ms. Pingree of Maine; and Mr. Quigley. 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Smith of Washington. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Van Hollen. 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr. 

Scott of Virginia. 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Pallone; 

Mr. Rush; Ms. Eshoo; Mr. Engel; Mr. Gene Green of Texas; 
2 

•HRES 7 EH 

Ms. DeGette; Mrs. Capps; Mr. Doyle; Ms. Schakowsky; Mr. 

Butterfield; Ms. Matsui; Ms. Castor of Florida; Mr. Sarbanes; Mr. McNerney; Mr. Welch; Mr. Ben Ray Luja ́n of 

New Mexico; Mr. Tonko (when sworn); Mr. Yarmuth; Ms. 

Clarke of New York; Mr. Loebsack; Mr. Schrader; Mr. Kennedy; and Mr. Ca ́rdenas. 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Ms. Waters 

(when sworn); Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (when 

sworn); Ms. Vela ́zquez (when sworn); Mr. Sherman; Mr. 

Meeks (when sworn); Mr. Capuano; Mr. Hinojosa; Mr. Clay; 

Mr. Lynch; Mr. David Scott of Georgia; Mr. Al Green of 

Texas; Mr. Cleaver; Ms. Moore; Mr. Ellison; Mr. Perlmutter; 

Mr. Himes; Mr. Carney; Ms. Sewell of Alabama; Mr. Foster; 

Mr. Kildee; Mr. Murphy of Florida; Mr. Delaney; Ms. 

Sinema; Mrs. Beatty; Mr. Heck of Washington; and Mr. 

Vargas. 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Engel (when 

sworn). 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Thompson 

of Mississippi. 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Brady of 

Pennsylvania. 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Conyers. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Grijalva. 
3 

•HRES 7 EH 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Cummings. 

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Ms. Slaughter; Mr. McGovern; 

Mr. Hastings of Florida; and Mr. Polis. 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY: 

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Vela ́zquez (when 

sworn). 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. DeFazio. 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Ms. Brown of 

Florida. 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Levin; Mr. Rangel (when sworn); Mr. McDermott; Mr. Lewis; Mr. Neal; Mr. 

Becerra; Mr. Doggett; Mr. Thompson of California; Mr. Larson of Connecticut; Mr. Blumenauer; Mr. Kind; Mr. Pascrell; 

Mr. Crowley (when sworn); Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois; 

and Ms. Linda T. Sa ́nchez of California. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ THOMAS A. MURDOCK

Thomas A. Murdock

Chief Executive Officer



EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Dudley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ ROGER D. DULEY

Roger D. Dudley

Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DOMINIC ANTHONY DICLEMENTE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:95-cr-00010-RLV; 5:07-cv-00066-RLV) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Clark Fischer, RANDOLPH & FISCHER, Winston-S alem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dominic Anthony Diclemente seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Diclemente has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-24151-CV

	InN tThHeE InNtTeErReEsStT oOfF F.D.H., A ChHiIlLdDDoOnNnNaA DaArRlLiInNgG, CoOmMmMuUnNiItTyY 	aAPPELLANTS

MaAnNaAgGeErR oOfF ClLaAyYtToOnN EsStTaAtTeEsS a

AnNdD RaAnNdDyY BrRoOoOkKsS, ReEgGiIoOnNaAlL MaAnNaAgGeErR o

OfF CMH PaArRkKsS, InNcC./ClLaAyYtToOnN EsStTaAtTeEsS 

	V.

RoOsSiIlLiIoO BoOnNiIlLlLaA	APPELLEE

APPELLANT

	V.

	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY THE 158TH158THE  DISCTRICET COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF   DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On jULYJuly 5, 2005  ___________ and July 287, 2005, __________, we notified appellants, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellants hasve not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellants hasve failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  aUGUSTAugust 18, 20095August 11, 2005