alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James M. Vanderhider, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 of Belden & Blake
Corporation;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 13, 2008 By: /s/ James M. Vanderhider
James M. Vanderhider, President, Chief Financial Officer and Director  2
p130074.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0074 Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ AH PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

Page 1p130074.eng

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T1 Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb, amide SAR), XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130074.eng

Page 3p130074.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0074

Page 4p130074.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0074

Page 5p130074.eng

Page 6p130074.eng

Page 7
#### State v. Dela Cruz

16603

9/7/94

Affirmed
20715

#### State v. Simeona

Affirmed
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   May 9, 2003                               /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                                  A  signed   original  of  this
                                                  written statement  required by
                                                  Section 906 has been  provided
                                                  to CNL  Income  Fund XI,  Ltd.
                                                  and  will be  retained  by CNL
                                                  Income  Fund  XI,   Ltd.   and
                                                  furnished  to  the  Securities
                                                  and Exchange Commission or its
                                                  staff upon request.
21109

#### State v. McKinney

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Hockey Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
O'Toole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 12, 2003
                                              THE HOCKEY COMPANY


                                              By: /s/ Matthew O'Toole
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                      Matthew O'Toole
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
#### C. Owens PARKER, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Lloyd H. HENRY, Judge of the District Court of Pottawatomie County, State of Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 50436.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 1, 1977.

Carl D. Hughes, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Procter, Fleming & Speck, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff below.

SIMMS, Justice:

Petitioner, defendant below, asks this Court to assume original jurisdiction and prays this Court prohibit respondent Judge from enforcing a November 3, 1976, order directing petitioner to deliver to plaintiff below certain personal property alleged to be wrongfully in possession of petitioner. Prohibition is also sought against further proceedings on a citation for contempt for alleged refusal to obey the November 3rd order.

The unverified petition filed in the trial court, which is submitted to this Court as an exhibit, clearly pleads a cause of action in replevin. In order for a plaintiff to an action to claim the delivery of property at the commencement of the suit, the statutorily required allegations of the petition must be verified by the party, or by his agent or attorney having personal knowledge. 12 O.S.Supp.1976, § 1571(A)(2). We hold that an unverified petition in the na*1250ture of replevin does not empower the court to order delivery of property at the time of commencement of the action.

Also, no replevin bond was filed as required by 12 O.S.Supp.1976, § 1573.1. No order of delivery may be issued until the undertaking has been executed. 12 O.S. Supp.1976, § 1571(A)(3).

We conclude the order of delivery entered by respondent on November 3rd on an unverified petition and without bond being executed is of no force and effect and respondent is prohibited from enforcement of the specified order.

The citation for indirect contempt was issued without an application or accusation being filed therefore. 21 O.S.1971, § 567 provides: “In all cases of indirect contempt the party charged with contempt shall be notified in writing of the accusation * * This language is construed to mean that proceedings to punish for indirect contempt, by law, require a formal charge in writing. *Ex parte Stephenson,*89 Okl.Cr. 427, 209 P.2d 515 (1949). Without written accusation charging such contempt, the proceedings are a nullity. *Blanton*v. *State,*31 Okl.Cr. 419, 239 P. 698 (1925).

We therefore grant prohibition against respondent proceeding against petition for contempt for alleged violation of the order of delivery. Application to assume original jurisdiction granted. Writ of prohibition issue.

All the Justices concur.
# C_2020010EN.01003101.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2019 — Bruno v Commission

(Case T-241/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Pension scheme - Severance grant - Payments to a national or private pension scheme since taking up duties - Pension rights acquired previously under a national scheme - Article 11(1) and Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Plea of illegality - Equal treatment)

(2020/C 10/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Bruno (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and R. Strian, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Gonzalez Argüelles, T. Lazian and J. Van Pottelberge, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 4 July 2017 dismissing the request made by the applicant to pay him the severance grant provided for in Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, alternatively, of the subsequent decision of 18 January 2018 dismissing the complaint lodged by the applicant against that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Luigi Bruno to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Luigi Bruno to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
NO. 06-14-00228-CR 

DAVID GARCIA REYES § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

VS. § FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 

OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

IN CAUSE NO. F13-61746-J 

 

APPELLANT’S SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND THE 

TIME FOR FILING THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: 

 COMES NOW the Appellant, David Garcia Reyes, and respectfully requests 

that the time for the filing of the Appellant’s brief in the above-styled and 

numbered causes be extended. In support of this motion the Appellant would 

show the Court the following: 

I. 

 Appellant was convicted of continuous sexual assault of a child and was 

sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. 

II. 

 The deadline for the filing of the Appellant’s brief is April 21, 2015. 

Appellant respectfully requests an extension until May 21, 2015. 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00228-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/21/2015 1:27:46 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/21/2015 1:27:46 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
III. 

 One previous extension of time has been granted. 

IV. 

The facts on which the Appellant relies to reasonably explain the need for 

this extension are as follows: 

Since the first extension was requested on March 26th, the undersigned 

attorney has prepared and filed the brief in Mikroberts, No. 05-14-00994-CR. The 

undersigned attorney is currently completing the brief in; Rico, No. 05-14-00251-

CR, which is due on April 22, 2015 pursuant to an order of abatement following 

the court reporter’s extremely lengthy delay in filing the record. Following the 

Rico brief, the undersigned attorney must prepare the brief in Jackson, No. 05-14-

00297-CR, which is due on April 27, 2015, which is also due pursuant to an order 

of abatement following the court reporter’s extremely lengthy delay in filing the 

record. Following the Jackson brief, the undersigned attorney will begin work on

the instant case. The undersigned attorney anticipates that it will take a minimum 

of two weeks to prepare the brief since the record is well over 1,000 pages long. 
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant respectfully 

requests that the time for the filing of the Appellant’s brief be extended until May 

21, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Lynn Richardson /s/ Kathleen A. Walsh 

Chief Public Defender Kathleen A. Walsh 

Dallas County Assistant Public Defender 

 State Bar No. 20802200 

 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-2 

 Dallas, TX. 75207-4399 

 (214) 653-3550 (telephone) 

 (214) 653-3539 (fax) 

 kwalsh@dallascounty.org 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing motion was served on the 

Appellate Division of the Dallas County District Attorney’s office on the 21st day 

of April, 2015 by electronic transmission to DCDAAppeals@dallascounty.org. 

 /s/ Kathleen A. Walsh 

 Kathleen A. Walsh
#### Bollag v. Karaviotis

15752

7/01/93

Granted
Order entered April 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01659-CV

ESTATE OF CLOYD D. YOUNG, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Pr-09-02344-1

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant Vivian Young’s March 28, 2013 unopposed second 

motion to extend time to file brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to 

file her brief by May 9, 2013. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of 

exceptional circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
NUMBER S 13
- 1 4
- 00 146
- CR , 13
- 14
- 00148
- CR AND 13
- 14
- 00150
- CR


### COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

VICENTE FABIAN , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam
Appellant, Vicente Fabian , seeks to appeal from his conviction s by filing pro se

n otice s of appeal. Sentence was imposed on December 17, 2013 and appellant’s trial counsel filed a motion to withdraw which was granted by the trial court on February 25,2

2014

. Because the r ecord fails to indicate whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel on appeal, we ABATE and REMAND th ese cause s

. Upon remand, the trial court is directed to: (1) immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is indigent; (2) appoint counsel to represent appellant on appeal if he is determined to be indigent; (3) make and file appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a clerk's record; (4) cause the hearing to be transcribed and included in a reporter's record; and (5) have these records forwarded to the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from the date of this order. If the trial court requires additional time to comply, the trial court should so notify the Clerk of this Court.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e 28th day of April , 2014

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 30, 2018

a1022

Order 

Clerk

October 30, 2018

157071 & (27)(29)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157071

COA: 338862

Oakland CC: 2013-246591-FH

JAMES COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions to supplement are GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### Lily Klein et al., Respondents, *v.*National Dye Works, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

February 10, 1959.

*517
      *Frederick Behr, Jr.,*for appellant.

*William H. George*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides that civil causes shall be tried in the order in which notes of issue have been filed *except as may otherwise be provided by the rule of any Appellate Division.*The Appellate Division of this Department has not promulgated any rule authorizing a preference in the City Court in a case where a party has refused to waive a jury trial or for any other reason. Accordingly the application is denied without prejudice to an application for a preference under rule 151.

The order granting preference of the trial of this action, which order set the case down for a date certain, should be reversed and the application denied.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                       
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/    GLENN L.
COOPER
|Chief Executive Officer
|December 7, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,066
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,143
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          68,803
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            68,876
<LOANS>                                        294,133
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,868
<DEPOSITS>                                     322,217
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,200
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,805
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 390,868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,234
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,626
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   473
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,333
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,345
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,988
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      242
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,624
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,632
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,632
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                        877
<LOANS-PAST>                                       124
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   791
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,851
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,104
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      201
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,163
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,163
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
CHAPTER 9.4.**INFECTION WITH INFECTIOUS HYPODERMAL AND HAEMATOPOIETIC NECROSIS VIRUS**

Article 9.4.1.

For the purposes of the *Aquatic Code*, infection with infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis virus means *infection***with the *pathogenic agent**Decapod ~~penstyldensovirus~~penstylhamaparvovirus*1, ~~commonly known as infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV),~~of the Genus *~~Penstyldensovirus~~Penstylhamaparvovirus*and Family *Parvoviridae*.

Information on methods for *diagnosis*is provided in the *Aquatic Manual*.

Article 9.4.2.

**Scope**

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.: blue shrimp (*Penaeus stylirostris*), giant tiger prawn *(Penaeus monodon)**,*northern white shrimp *(Penaeus setiferus),***yellowleg shrimp *(Penaeus californiensis)*, ~~giant tiger prawn *(Penaeus monodon)*~~, ~~northern white shrimp *(Penaeus setiferus)*~~, ~~blue shrimp*(Penaeus stylirostris)*~~**and whiteleg shrimp *(Penaeus vannamei)*.

[...]

______________