alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020103EN.01002201.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kibelisa Ngambasai v Council

(Case T-169/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Plea of illegality)

(2020/C 103/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
June 25, 2002

22986

#### Small Landowners Ass'n v. City and County of Honolulu

Vacated and Remanded
##### 



DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
NON-OFFICER STOCK OPTION PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2006
 Purpose of Plan.
 Administration of Plan.
 Shares Subject to Plan.




---



##### 



Eligible Participants.
 Terms and Conditions of Employee Options.
        2




---



##### 



Manner of Exercising Options.
 Transferability and Termination of Options.
  3




---



##### 



Dissolution, Liquidation, Merger.
 4




---



##### 



Substitution Options.
 Tax Withholding.
 5




---



##### 



Termination of Employment.
 Adjustment for Changes in Capitalization
 Other Terms and Conditions.
 Option Agreements.
 Amendment and Discontinuance of Plan.
 Effective Date.
 6
# C_2020313EN.01002401.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v ECB

(Case T-577/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution - First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Continued breach of capital requirements - Negligent breach - Rights of defence - Amount of the penalty - Obligation to state reasons)

(2020/C 313/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (Montrouge, France) (represented by: A. Champsaur and A. Delors, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta, A. Pizzolla and D. Segoin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2018-FRCAG-76 of the ECB of 16 July 2018, taken pursuant to Article 18(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the ECB concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63) and imposing on the applicant an administrative pecuniary penalty of EUR 300 000 for continued breach of the capital requirements laid down in Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, and corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68, and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision ECB/SSM/2018-FRCAG-76 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 16 July 2018 in so far as it imposes on Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank an administrative pecuniary penalty of EUR 300 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision ECB/SSM/2018-FRCAG-76 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 16 July 2018 in so far as it imposes on Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank an administrative pecuniary penalty of EUR 300 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders the ECB to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the ECB to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



GENAERA CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy C. Levitt, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Roy C. Levitt                 
|                                     
|Roy C. Levitt, M.D.                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer



November 7, 2003
#### William K. Sargent, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. S. J. Triplett and W. B. Harris, *Defendants in Error.*

Decision Filed April 28, 1915.

Writ of error to Circuit Court for Osceola County; Jas. W. Perkins, Judge.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered that the defendants in error do have and recover of and from the plaintiff in error their costs by them in tjiis behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of $......., all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 131 ) ll-E-9 1 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07AM Sheet 131 of 264P. 2 02/13/199 7 15:4 7 334452058 8 W/13/t 7 18: 3 1 WU19941023 4 RUBBE RS PLASTI

C PE S RT P N C PAG E 0 2 I I 002.7002 

### A 9 4 5 2
Contac tRepor t Plasti c Composit e NESHA P I rom : late : ( ontact : Company : Gre g LaFlam . Pacific Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) November12.199 6 Mr . Willia m Wells , Presiden

t Rubbe r & Plastic Applicators , Inc. , Mobile , A L Telephon e Number : (334)452-058 5 

## CL2 2' S 3 3
EP A AI R DOCKE

T
Cfontac tSummary : Th e compan y produce s corrosion-resistan

tproduct s (stacks , tanks , etc. ) usin g filament winding an

d han d layup . Mos to f

th e resi n mixin g i s don

e i n 55-sallo n drums , usin g tw o forms o f covere d mixing . I n on e type , a cove rwit h a 2.5-inc

h hol e (fo rth e mixershaft ) i s used . I n th e s xon d typ e (use d mos toften) , a tota l coverwit h essentiall y complet

e sealin g an

d n o opening s i s used . Th e facilit

y ha s th e capacit

y t o operat

e 4 to 6 mixer

s a x one time .

IEPOR T I S ACCURATE
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Esther Hobart Morris Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Avard Fairbanks

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1960

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of Esther Hobart Morris was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Wyoming in 1960.

Esther Hobart Morris was born in Tioga County, New York, on August 8, 1814. Orphaned at age 11, she was apprenticed to a seamstress and became a successful milliner and businesswoman. As a young woman she was active in the anti-slavery movement. In 1841 she married Artemus Slack; after his death in 1845, she moved to Peru, Illinois, to settle the property in his estate but faced considerable difficulty because women were prohibited from owning or inheriting property. She married John Morris, a prosperous merchant, in 1850.

In 1868–1869 the family moved to a gold rush camp at South Pass City, Wyoming Territory. On December 10, 1869, Wyoming passed a law guaranteeing women's rights to vote and to hold office. In addition to this legislative milestone, laws were also passed affirming married women's control of their own property and providing equal pay for women teachers.

When appointed justice of the peace for the South Pass District in 1870, Morris became the first woman to hold judicial office in the modern world. During the statehood celebration in 1890 she was honored as a suffrage pioneer. In 1895, at age 80, she was elected a delegate to the national suffrage convention in Cleveland. She died in Cheyenne on April 3, 1902, and is interred there at Lakeview Cemetery. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 525 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 525

     Urging the Administration to work with North Atlantic Treaty 
 Organization member states to invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic 
                Treaty in response to the Paris attacks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2015

Mr. Poe of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Urging the Administration to work with North Atlantic Treaty 
 Organization member states to invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic 
                Treaty in response to the Paris attacks.

Whereas terrorist attacks in Paris, France, killed an estimated 129 civilians at 
        7 different locations on November 13, 2015;
Whereas ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attacks and vowed to carry out 
        additional attacks against Western targets and North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization (NATO) member states;
Whereas Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at Washington, April 4, 
        1949, states that ``The Parties agree that an armed attack against one 
        or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack 
        against them all . . . .'';
Whereas France is a signatory of NATO and the November 13, 2015, attack 
        qualifies as an ``armed attack'' against a member country in Europe; and
Whereas NATO members, including France, invoked Article 5 less than 24 hours 
        after the September 11, 2001, attacks in solidarity with the people of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls on the President 
to work closely with other North Atlantic Treaty Organization members 
to invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty in response to the 
Paris attacks.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ MICHAEL L. BENNETTMichael L. BennettChief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: July 24, 2009
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 24, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-0533 Lower Tribunal No. F93-44126A

________________ 

### Thomas James, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge. Thomas James, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
|                                  |   |       |   | State or Other |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                                  |   | Percentage |   | Jurisdiction             |
| Subsidiaries (1)                 |   | Owned      |   | of Incorporation    |
|                                  |   |       |   |                     |
| Ameriana Bank (2)                     |   | 100%       |   | United States            |
|                                  |   |       |   |                     |
| Ameriana Insurance Agency, Inc. (3)   |   | 100        |   | Indiana                  |
|                                  |   |       |   |                     |
| Ameriana Financial Services, Inc. (3) |   | 100        |   | Indiana                  |
|                                  |   |       |   |                     |
| Ameriana Capital Trust I              |   | 100        |   | Delaware                 |
|                                  |   |       |   |                     |
| Midwest Corporate Tax Credit Fund     |   | 6          |   | Indiana                  |

----

| (1) | Operations of the Company’s wholly-owned direct subsidiary, Ameriana Bank and Ameriana Bank’s two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Ameriana Insurance Agency, Inc, and Ameriana Financial Services, Inc. are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Additionally, the results of operations of a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Ameriana Bank that was liquidated effective December 31, 2009, Ameriana Investment Management, Inc., are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | First-tier subsidiary of the Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------|

| (3) | Second-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by Ameriana Bank, a first-tier subsidiary of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
# C_2020433EN.01001502.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy v Gorzowie Wielkopolskim (Poland) lodged on 3 October 2018 — Prokuratura Rejonowa w Słubicach v BQ

(Case C-623/18)

(2020/C 433/18)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy v Gorzowie Wielkopolskim

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Prokuratura Rejonowa w Słubicach

Defendant: BQ

By order of 6 October 2020, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) ruled that the request for a preliminary ruling is manifestly inadmissible.

---
20237

#### State v. Kido

Affirmed
# C_2019263EN.01004301.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2019 — MPM-Quality v EUIPO — Elton Hodinářská (MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949)

(Case T-75/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 - Genuine use of the mark - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 263/48)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: MPM-Quality v.o.s. (Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Elton Hodinářská a.s. (Nové Město nad Metují, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Matoušek, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 December 2017 (Case R 556/2017-4) relating to revocation proceedings between MPM-QUALITY and ELTON hodinářská.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders MPM-QUALITY v.o.s. to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders MPM-QUALITY v.o.s. to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders ELTON hodinářská, a.s. to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ELTON hodinářská, a.s. to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 26.3.2018.

---
November 2, 2000

23101

#### State v. Guerpo

Affirmed
#### Jardine v. State

20593

10/30/98

Affirmed
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of A.L.D.L.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00826-CV

Trial court case number: 14-FD-2183

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

Proceeding pro se, appellant, P.D., filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final 

judgment terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 

26.3, 28.4. The trial court clerk filed, on October 13, 2015, the clerk’s record and, on 

December 9, 2015, a supplemental clerk’s record on indigence. The court reporter filed the 

reporter’s record on December 18, 2015. The Clerk of this Court received from appellant, 

on December 16, 2015, a pro se brief and, on December 30, 2015, a supplement to that 

brief. The Clerk of this Court is directed to file the brief and supplement as of the dates 

received.

Appellee’s brief, if any, is due within 20 days of the date of this order. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 28.6(b).

Because this appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship, the 

Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of September 28, 

2015, the date the notice of appeal was filed in this proceeding, so far as reasonably 

possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, reprinted in Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann., tit. 2, subtit. F 

app. (Vernon 2013). Accordingly, no extensions will be granted absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually 

Date: January 7, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Hockey Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Desrosiers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 12, 2003

                                              THE HOCKEY COMPANY


                                              By: /s/ Robert Desrosiers
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                      Robert Desrosiers
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. Apao

20855

11/19/98

Affirmed