alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019357EN.01003301.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2019 — Oakley v EUIPO — Xuebo Ye (Representation of a discontinuous ellipse)

(Case T-744/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a discontinuous ellipse - Earlier EU figurative mark representing an ellipse - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 357/40)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Oakley, Inc. (Foothill Ranch, California, United States) (represented by: E. Ochoa Santamaría and I. Aparicio Martínez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Xuebo Ye (Wenzhou, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 October 2018 (Case R 692/2018-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Oakley and Xuebo Ye.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 October 2018 (Case R 692/2018-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 October 2018 (Case R 692/2018-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by Oakley, Inc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by Oakley, Inc.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.1.2




                     AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO RSI HOLDINGS, INC.
                               STOCK OPTION PLAN


         This  Amendment  is made as of the ______ day of _______,  1997 to the
RSI  Holdings,  Inc.  Stock  Option Plan, as amended to date (the "Plan").

         1.       The second sentence of Section 4 entitled "Stock Subject to 
Plan" shall be deleted and replaced with the following:

                  An aggregate of 750,000 shares are reserved for the grant
                  under this Plan of Options, any or all of which, at the
                  Board's (or Committee's, as applicable) discretion, may be
                  intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section
                  422 of the Code.

         In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, John J. Letter, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Ameriana Bancorp,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriana Bancorp; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 28, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Financial
Federal Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended July 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission (the
"Report"), Paul R. Sinsheimer, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



September 25, 2007               /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
------------------               -------------------------------------
Date                             Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .
Agreement s Adopte d byth e Traffi c Conference s o fth e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n 

## OST-2011 - 00^ 5

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B YTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT AAGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKETOST - Z*U . ^Of S ACTIO!. ' DAT E^"^^^ 1 ( Thi s approva l r''" . ; ' t o condition s I : Tiri s actio ni

^ j- i . 14CP!<385,ii , • ; : inview o l tn c a<;i\;. . the abov e proccduiv . BY : iject , wher e applicable .

. '• • i: . tile dunder ./.:.': : ritiicnt' s ownmotion .

.. ^ .;;•.; , ili e availability o f i l i^3A 2 i s waived . 6 Ma y201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St.N.W . #12 * Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1619

VERSUS

TRESSIE LUCINDA NEWBERRY MARCH 14, 2022

In Re: Tressie Lucinda Newberry, applying for supervisory

writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East

Baton Rouge, No. 09- 13- 0206. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. This court returned the

record on December 13, 2021. Counsel failed to include the

application for postconviction relief, the State' s response, the

commissioner' s report, the district court' s

ruling, and the

trial transcript. Supplementation of this writ application

and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See

Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. 

Any future filing on this issue should include the entire

contents of this application, the missing items noted above, and

a

copy of this ruling. In the event relator elects to file a

new application with this court, he may do so without the

necessity of obtaining a return date, and the application must

be filed on or before April 11, 2022. 

JMG

GH

WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

AEWI#JIY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden & Blake Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the
undersigned:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Date:    November 12, 2002               /s/  John L. Schwager
     ----------------------              ------------------------------------
                                          John L. Schwager, Director, President
                                          and Chief Executive Officer


                                       25
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

February 9, 2012

Hahn Nguyen Senior Account Manager Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc. 12121 Scripps Summit Drive, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92131-4609

RE: Sola Optical Superfund Site Petaluma, California

Dear Ms. Nguyen:

I am writing to you regarding the Sola Optical Superfund Site in Petaluma, California. Pursuant to EPA

Administrative Order No. 92

- 07 and the 2002 Monitoring Work Plan, Sola Optical U.S.A. Inc. and, more recently, Carl Zeiss Vision Inc., have conducted groundwater monitoring and submitted reports regarding groundwater contamination at the Sola Optical Superfund Site.

The most recent report was submitted to EPA on January 9, 2012, and summarized the results ofmonitoring conducted in June 2010. This report reflects that concentrations of the only remaining Siterelated contaminant, 1,1-Dichlorethane (1,1-DCA), appears to have dropped below the clean- up stand ard established in the Record of Decision Amendment dated March 30, 2007. However, additional samples are needed to confirm the trend.

Carl Zeiss Vision should resume groundwater monitoring at the Sola Optical Superfund Site as soon as possible. If the next groundwater sampling round confirms that the contaminant concentration levels remain below the clean-up standard, EPA may have sufficient data to pursue close out of the site. See generally, Close Out Procedures for National Priorities List Sites (May 2011), available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/npl_hrs/closeout/pdf/2011guidance.pdf . If the results display an upward trend, however, semi-annual monitoring should continue.

Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. I can be reached at (415) 972- 3166 or rodriguez.dante@epa.gov. Thank you very much, and we look forward to working with you to achieve closure of this Superfund Site.

Sincerely,

Dante Rodriguez, P.E. Sola Optical Project Manager U.S. EPA Region 9

cc: Daren Roth, Arcadis
#### Potter, ex parte, *v.*Russell, Supt. of Dayton Workhouse.

(No. 31716

Decided May 25, 1949.)

*Mr. Louis C. Capelle, Mr. Robert E. Brooks*and *Mr. Robert L. Young,*for petitioner.

*Mr. Herbert 8. Beane,*city attorney, and *Mr. Joseph P. Duffy,*for respondent.

By the Court.

George Potter, the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus and discharge from custody, charges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the superintendent of the workhouse of the city of Dayton.

The petitioner alleges that he was convicted in the Municipal Court of the city of Dayton under an affidavit charging him with being an habitual offender and thereupon was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of three years. He complains that he was deprived of constitutional rights in that he was without the benefit of counsel when he entered a plea of guilty, and that the sentence to prison for three years for the commission of four misdemeanors imposed upon him cruel and unusual punishment.

The answer of the respondent admits the detention of the petitioner and alleges such detention is in compliance with a commitment issued by the judge of the Municipal Court of Dayton, and that respondent “continues to detain him until the sentence imposed by the trial court has been fully executed or until he be otherwise discharged according to law.”

It being disclosed that the three-year sentence, by *447virtue of which the respondent asserts the petitioner has been detained, has expired, it is ordered that he forthwith be discharged from confinement.

*Petitioner discharged.*

Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taft, JJ., concur.

Weygandt, C. J.,

dissents on the ground that the case clearly is moot.

This dissent is not based on a difference of opinion as to the law and the facts considered in the majority opinion. Bather, it is bottomed on the important additional undisputed facts developed during the course of the trial.

This action is addressed to the *original*jurisdiction of this court. This, of course, means that the ease has not been tried previously in a lower court. Hence, it is not here on any record made below, but it must be determined on the facts presented in this court.

The sole relief asked by the petitioner is that a writ of habeas corpus be granted and that he be released from custody under a certain three-year sentence. It is agreed that this sentence *ended,*on April 8 of this year and that the petitioner has *not*been held on *this*sentence since that date.

It is agreed, too, .that the petitioner is being held under *other*subsequent sentences imposed by reason of the fact that he has escaped from custody three times. No relief is asked from these sentences. Consequently, the allowance of this writ concededly will have no effect as to the sentences under which the petitioner actually is being held but it will merely order him released from serving a sentence which he already has served and from which he already has been discharged.
1 

### Cole, Jeffrey D.

From: Hill, Kenneth A. [K.Hill@WestonSolutions.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:56 AM

To: 'Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov'

Cc: Cole, Jeffrey D.; 'John.Tissue@ex eloncorp.com'; Allan, Brian

Subject: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Importance: High

Bill, this time without the Weston Confidentiality Statement.

The Hg concentrations and emission factors shown in the spread sheet for Docket ID No. EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐ 2009

‐ 0234

(Document ID No.2080) from the Regulations.Gov web site are incorrect. The values summarized in the table below are

correct. The corresponding Excel column and row numbers from the spread sheet are shown for your reference.

Thank You,

EIA Facility Code: 3159

Facility Name: Cromby Generating Station

Boiler ID: 2

Excel Row Excel Column

F K

Total Vapor Phase Mercury

Emission Test Results

Measured Value

(μg/dscm) (lb/mmBtu)

7 0.074 1.34E-07

8 0.053 9.20E-08

9 0.039 7.08E-08

Ken Hill

Project Manager

Weston Solutions, Inc.

Integrated Air Services

1400 Weston Way

West Chester, PA 19380

Office: 610

‐ 701

‐ 3043

Cell: 610

‐ 721

‐ 6521

Fax: 610

‐ 721

‐ 3161

www.westonsolutions.com
#### State v. Lau

20636

02/17/1999

Vacated and Remanded for New Trial
May 6, 2002

23175

#### Flynn v. Exceptional Inc.

Affirmed
# C_2019413EN.01004702.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Mopeds)

(Case T-219/18) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a moped - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Different overall impression - Informed user - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Interpretation consistent with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 - No use of an earlier three-dimensional national trademark not registered in the registered design - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 - No unauthorised use of a work protected by the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2019/C 413/56)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Piaggio & C. SpA (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, B. La Tella and B. Lucchetti, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group Co. Ltd (Taizhou City, China) (represented by: M. Spolidoro, M. Gurrado, S. Verea and M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2018 (Case R 1496/2015-3), in relation to cancellation proceedings between Piaggio & C. and Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Piaggio & C. SpA to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Piaggio & C. SpA to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 28.5.2018.

---
Order No. 97-50

17278

May 8, 1997

#### State v. Schmidt

Affirmed
## Committe e Purpose To advise the Access Boar d on ma tte rsre la te d to the r evision and upda te o f the guidelines addr essing tr ansport at ion ve hicles using fix ed guidew aysyste ms subject t o the Americ ans with Disabilities Act (AD A)

## Wh y the Advisory Committe e

• Combines the bes t elemen ts of consensus rulemaking and the F eder al rulemaking pr ocess • Allows the Boar d access t o e xpertise not alw ay s r eadily a va ilable • Dev elops support for the rule

## Access Boar d’ s Jurisdiction We ca n addr ess: • Ph ysical elemen ts of v ehicles using fix ed guidew aysyste ms (e. g., r apid r ail, ligh t ra il, co mmut er rail, and in te rc ity r ail ) • New and re manufactur ed tr ansport ation ve hicles, t o the e xt en t r equir ed by r egulations issued by DOT

## Access Boar d’ s Jurisdiction We ca n addr ess: • Te chnical r equir emen ts (e. g. siz e, loc ation, co nfigur ation, and r efer enced sta ndar ds) • Sc oping (e. g. number and trig gering ev en ts) exc ept wher e pr escribed in the AD A or addr essed by en fo rc ing agency

## Access Boar d’ s Jurisdiction We cannot addr ess: • Po licies, pr actices, or pr ocedur es or modifications to them • Furnitur e and equipmen t that is not part of the v ehicle • Auxiliary aids and services • Whether t o permit cert ain types of service animals

## Out of Committe e Sc ope

• Buses and va ns (rubber tir es) • Buildings and fa cilities

### Wha t We Would Like to See in a

Final R eport Re co mmendations fo r r evisions t o curr en t re quir emen ts • Change ; • Re mov e ; or • Re ta in

### Wha t We Would Like to See in a

Final R eport Re co mmendations addr essing g aps in the curr en t r equir emen ts, e. g. fea tur es pr omoting: • Mobility access • Communications access • Other (curr en tly uniden tified) fe atur es addr essing the needs of people with other types of disabilities

### Wha t We Would Like to See in a

Final R eport Rationale fo r each r ec ommendation • Wh y is the change needed • Supporting dat a or other re lev an t information • A description of who benefits • Wher e possible, cos t consider ations

## Final Committe e Re port

• Minimum appr opriat e s ta ndar d to ensur e non discrimination on the basis of disability • Build on e xis ting AD A St andar ds

– Departur es fr om curr en t Boar d rules should be based on new information or the unique charact eris tics of the v ehicle

## Final R eport Fo rma t

• Plain English • Re gulat ory format is not necessary • Supplemen ta l mat erial such as illus tr ations and advisory only if time permits

## Thank Y

ou! We appr ecia te yo ur time, energy , and co mmitmen t t o accessibility
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 86689)    

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 29 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-97, CP2024-99.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-27417 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P