alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:
March 30, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James M. VanderhiderJames M. Vanderhider, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E A T R IZ E L E N A E S P IN E L , a. k. a. E dw i ng F l ores -G on za l ez , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71329 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 163- 123 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B eatri z E l ena E spi nel , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f V enez uel a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew o f th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED JU N 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71329 2 d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 32 1 F . 3d88 9, 89 4 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng E spi nel ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here i tw as fi l ed m ore than 9 0 d ay s a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nalre m ov al o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and E spi nelfa i l ed t o est abl i sh changed c i r c u ms t an c e s i n V e n e z u e l at o qu a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me lim ita tio n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; se e al so T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 9 8 8 , 9 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( r e qu ir in g m o v an t to p r o du c e m a te r ia l e v id e n c e w ith m ot i on t o reopen thatcond i t i on s i n cou ntryof nat i on al i ty had changed). C o u n s e l’s m o tio n to w ith d r aw is g r an te d . T h e d o c k e t s h a ll b e am e n d e dto re fl ec tthatE spi neli s proce edi ng pro se. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### State v. Rogers

21380

12/21/98

Reversed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Bring a Pet Amphibian into the

United States

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS Veterinary Services does not have any animal health requirements related to

bringing (importing) a pet amphibian into the United States from a foreign country.

See below to view other requirements for bringing pet amphibians into the United

States from another country.
U.S. State and Territory Requirements

Domestic movement requirements are set by the receiving State or Territory.

Visit the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture to find your

destination's agriculture department and check its website for requirements.

For questions or clarification on any of the requirements, contact the State or

Territorial veterinarian's office.
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119*Commercial/financial information may be entitled to confidential treatment*120121122123*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*124125126127128129Pages 130-132 - Confidential Statements of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 12, 2009
    By:

/s/
James M. VanderhiderJames M. Vanderhider, President,Chief Financial Officer and Director
#### Martin *v.*Quinby, trustee.

No. 4913.

October 14, 1925.

Receivership. Before Judge Bell.. Fulton superior court. April 3, 1925.

*Bay & Bay,*for plaintiff in error. *McFlreath & Scott,*contra.

Beck, P. J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case, it does not appear that the court abused its discretion in appointing a receiver to take charge of the property, and in ordering a sale of the property upon the terms prescribed in the order.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 31.2
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Edward J. Puisis, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of Dayton Superior Corporation as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;  4.  Dayton Superior Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Dayton Superior Corporation and we have:
 a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Dayton Superior Corporation, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b.  evaluated the effectiveness of Dayton Superior Corporation’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  c.  disclosed in this annual report any change in Dayton SuperiorCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringDayton Superior Corporation’s most recent fiscal year that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dayton SuperiorCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  Dayton Superior Corporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to DaytonSuperior Corporation’s auditors and the audit committee of Dayton Superior Corporation’sboard of directors:
 a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect Dayton Superior Corporation’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Dayton Superior Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.         March 31, 2005 /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
December 15, 2003

25658

#### State v. Allison

Remanded
#### State v. Najibi

16307

2/17/95

Affirmed, Vacated, and Remanded
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 listed below of RMI
Titanium Company of our report dated January 23, 1997, appearing on page 20 of
this annual report on Form 10-K.
 
     File No. 33-36248 Relating to the RMI 1989 Stock Option Incentive Plan
 
     File No. 33-38340 Relating to the RMI Bargaining Unit Employees Savings and
     Investment Plan
 
     File No. 33-38339 Relating to the RMI Savings and Investment Plan
 
     File No. 33-63025 Relating to the RMI Titanium Company 1995 Stock Plan
 
Price Waterhouse LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT

# OF

# EXABYTE CORPORATION

# FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 2004

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and
 the Chief Financial Officer of Exabyte Corporation (Exabyte). This Certification is made pursuant
 to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-K/A Report of
 Exabyte for the year ended January 3, 2004.

We certify that such 10-K/A Report fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
 contained in such 10-K/A Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
 results of operations of Exabyte.

This Certification is executed as of August 18, 2004.

Tom W. WardPresident and ChiefExecutive Officer(Principal
 Executive Officer)

/s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE

Carroll A. Wallace Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting
 Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:    August 11, 2008
    By:

/s/
James M. VanderhiderJames M. Vanderhider, President,Chief Financial Officer and Director
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 21.01 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

INTERLAND, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K

                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         STATE (OR         PERCENTAGE
                                                      JURISDICTION) IN      OWNERSHIP
                      NAME                           WHICH INCORPORATED   BY REGISTRANT
                      ----                           ------------------   -------------
<S>                                                  <C>                  <C>
CommuniTech.Net, Inc.                                Missouri                 100%
DialTone, Inc.                                       Florida                  100%
iNNERHOST, Inc.                                      Florida                  100%
Interland B.V                                        Netherlands              100%
HostPro, Inc. (f/k/a Micron PC Web Services, Inc.)   Delaware                 100%
HostPro Acquisition Canada                           Canada                   100%
Wazoo Web, Inc.                                      Georgia                  100%
MEI California, Inc.                                 California               100%
Micron Electronics (H.K.) Limited                    Hong Kong                100%
Micron Electronics Overseas Trading, Inc.            Barbados                 100%
Micron Electronics International, Inc.               Delaware                 100%
Micron Computer of Canada, Inc.                      Canada                   100%
Micron Electronics Asia-Pacific Holdings, Inc.       B.V.I.                   100%
Micron Electronics Asia-Pacific Operations, Inc.     B.V.I.                   100%
Micron Electronics Asia-Pacific Trading, Ltd.        Hong Kong                100%
iNNERHOST Holdings, Inc.                             B.V.I.                   100%
Trellix Corporation                                  Massachusetts            100%
Hostcentric, Inc.                                    Delaware                 100%
Hostcentric Technologies, Inc.                       Delaware                 100%
Hostcentric GP, Inc.                                 Delaware                 100%
Hostcentric LP, Inc.                                 Delaware                 100%
Hostcentric Management Co. LP                        Texas                    100%
Domain Names International LLC                       Delaware                 100%
</TABLE>

                                       19
#### Iman HARDY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

No. 16-1668

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

September 13, 2017

Sharon Fray-Witzer, Boston, MA, for petitioner.

Michael A. Rotker, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Appellate Section, with whom Kenneth A. Blanco, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Trevor N. McFadden, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Divi*86sion, U.S. Department of Justice, William D. Weinreb, Acting U.S. Attorney, and Dina M. Chaitowitz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief, Appellate Division, were on ■brief, for respondent.

Before THOMPSON, KAYATTA, and BARRON, Circuit Judges.

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

For the reasons stated in today’s opinion in Moore v. United States, No. 16-1612, 871 F.3d 72, 2017 WL 4021654 (1st Cir. Sept. 13, 2017), we certify Iman Hardy’s successive § 2255 motion insofar as it argues that Johnson II invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker career offender guideline. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2) (setting out the certification requirements for successive motions).

Hardy also argues that Welch v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1257, 194 L.Ed.2d 387 (2016), establishes that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), is a substantive decision with retroactive effect. We cannot certify this portion of Hardy’s motion. This court has already held that Booker was not a substantive decision and therefore did not have retroactive effect. See Cirilo-Muñoz v. United States, 404 F.3d 527, 532-33 (1st Cir. 2005); see also Sepulveda v. United States, 330 F.3d 55, 59 (1st Cir. 2003) (holding that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), which held that a jury rather than a judge must find facts that raise a statutory maximum, was not a substantive decision). Welch has not cast doubt on that holding. Instead, Welch reaffirmed that a decision that “ ‘allocate^] decisionmaking authority’ between judge and jury” is procedural. Welch, 136 S.Ct. at 1265 (quoting Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 353, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004)). Booker, which held that the mandatory guidelines were unconstitutional insofar as they allowed a judge, rather than a jury, to find facts that increased a defendant’s maximum mandatory guidelines sentence, 543 U.S. at 244, 125 S.Ct. 738 (opinion of Stevens, J.), was precisely a decision of this sort.

Accordingly, we certify Iman Hardy’s successive § 2255 motion insofar as it argues that Johnson II invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker career offender guideline. We do not certify it insofar as it argues that Booker is a substantive decision with retroactive effect under Welch.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10.3(B)


                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Amendment made as of this 10th day of April, 2002 is by and
between The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("the Company") and
Frank Tworecke ("Employee").

                               W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS, Employee is currently employed by the Company pursuant to an
Employment Agreement dated November 11, 1999 ("Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Employee mutually desire to amend the
Employment Agreement and to extend its term;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts, mutual promises and
covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company
and Employee hereby agree as follows:

         1. Effective March 16, 2001, paragraph 4(a) of the Employment Agreement
         shall be amended to provide for an increase in Employee's base salary
         to an annual rate of $475,000.

         2. Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to provide that
         the Employment Agreement shall continue through and terminate on
         January 29, 2005, unless sooner terminated in accordance with paragraph
         13 of the Employment Agreement.

         3. Paragraph 9 of the Employment Agreement is superceded in its
         entirety by the terms and provisions of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.
         Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.

         4. Except as provided in this Amendment, the terms of the Employment
         Agreement shall remain in effect and Employee shall retain all
         compensation, benefits and stock options previously granted to him,
         subject to the vesting schedule set forth in the Employment Agreement.


                                       1
<PAGE>
                                           THE BON-TON STORES, INC.

                                            By: /s/ Tim Grumbacher
                                                Tim Grumbacher
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Frank Tworecke
                                                Frank Tworecke


                                       2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM STANCIL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 55 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
26639

#### State v. Tulia

Affirmed