alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Thomas A. Murdock



Thomas A. Murdock

Chief Executive Officer





---

EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Dudley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Roger D. Dudley



Roger D. Dudley

Chief Financial Officer
THOMAS B. BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4676

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Hulsey III, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

History of Requirement Updates for

Animal Product Exports

Last Modified: 

Print

This webpage serves as a resource for you to find and view updates to animal

product export requirements posted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s

(USDA’s) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) International

Regulations for Animal Product Exports web pages. The information presented here

is organized by date, country of destination, topic, and description.

For countries not listed, the requirements are not known. However, exporters

wanting to ship animal products should have the interested party (importer/buyer) in

the destination country contact the appropriate ministry for the specific

requirements.

Animal Product Export Requirements - Select a Country - ▾ Go

iRegs History Updates

By default, the most recent changes are shown first.

Loading...
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAY LYNN PEMBER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

SCOTT, Unknown; et al.,

Defendants. No. 19

- 15281

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 04069

- JJT

- JFM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2019 **

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ , Circuit Judges.

Jay Lynn Pember, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 19

- 15281

court ’ s order denying his motion s for injuncti ve relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action alleging de liberate indifference to his serious medical needs

. W e have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 129 2(a)(1)

. We review for an abuse of discretion,

Puen te Ariz

. v. A rpaio , 821 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir. 2016) , and we affirm.

T he district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Pember’s motion s

for a preliminary injunction because Pember failed to establish that he wa s likely to

suffer irreparable harm

. S ee Winter v. Nat

. Res

. Def

. Council , Inc.

, 555 U.S. 7, 20

(2008) (listing factors for district court to consider in evaluating a motion for a

preliminary injunction ).

We do not consider Pember’s contentions regarding his January 30, 2019

motion for a preliminary injunction or the merits of his underlying complaint

because those issues are outside the scope of this appeal.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argue d

in the opening brief

, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal

. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pember’s request for judicial notice , set forth in his reply brief, is denied

.

Pember’s motion to con solidate (Docket Entry No. 11) is denied as moot

.

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

People of MI v Danie l Dante Burch 

DocketNo. 3228 14 

LC No. 13-006304-FC 

Amy Ronayne Krause 

Presiding Judge 

Jane E. Markey 

Michael J. Kelly 

Judges 

The Court orders that the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED, and this Court's 

opinion issued February 11, 2016, is hereby VACATED. A new opinion is attached to this order. 

A true copy entered and certified by .Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

MAY 0 3 2016 

Date
# C_2019155EN.01004301.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — IQ Group Holdings Bhd v EUIPO — Krinner Innovation (Lumiqs)

(Case T-133/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Lumiqs - Earlier EU word and figurative marks Lumix - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 155/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: IQ Group Holdings Bhd (Heckmondwike, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Carter, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Krinner Innovation GmbH (Straßkirchen, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2017 (Case R 983/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Krinner Innovation and IQ Group Holdings Bhd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2017 (Case R 983/2017-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2017 (Case R 983/2017-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by IQ Group Holdings Bhd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by IQ Group Holdings Bhd;

| 3. | Orders Krinner Innovation GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Krinner Innovation GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 13, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-213883) of Smart Trust 283,
comprising Smart Trust, Adelante REIT Growth and Income Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 13, 2016
18310

#### State v. Nolan

January 2, 1997

Order No. 97-1

Affirmed
February 23, 2001

22021

#### State v. Davis

Affirmed
#### Renshaw v. Hawaiian Tradewinds

17691

11/27/96

Affirmed
April 11, 2001

22962

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION C f^ C |\ / P F ^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS JxCwdVI— •-' 

WASHINGTON, D.C. j^ ^ ^ 6 20tt 

HEARING DUCKET 

In the Matter of Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP10EA0006 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0626 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ^- -lo^^^ 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR A 

POSTPONEMENT OF THE HEARING 

COMES NOW the Complainant, by and through its designated representative, 

the Regional Counsel for the Eastern Region and his designated and authorized 

agents, and responds to Respondent's Request for a Postponement of the Hearing 

as follows: 

Complainant does not object to Respondent's request to change the hearing 

date, except that Complainant's Counsel is unavailable April 4-6 and the week of 

April 24, 2011. 

In addition. Complainant respectfully requests that it be permitted to 
supplement its Witness and Exhibit List prior to the hearing. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: /^^ t )^C^r^' ^ Dated: 1 h^l n 

Jeanme C. Godmer 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel (AEA-7) 

Eastern Region Headquarters 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3272 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing were placed in the United 

States mail, postage prepaid. First Class Mail addressed as follows: 

And via facsimile 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX 202-366-7536 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

And via facsimile 

David Harrison, President 

Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

106 Wells Cove Road 

P O Box 98 

Grasonville,MD 21638 

FAX 410-827-4830 

Marianna Perero 

Paralegal Specialist 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, inc. 8-K


 


Exhibit 10.1





July 16, 2018


 


 


Via Electronic Mail


 


Cleanspark, Inc.


6365 Nancy Ridge Drive,
Fl. 2


San Diego, California 92121


Attention: Zachary Bradford,
President


 


Re:Extension of Termination
Date


 


Dear Mr. Bradford:


 


Reference is made
to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Cleanspark, Inc. (“Cleanspark”) and Pioneer
Custom Electric Products Corp. (“Pioneer”), dated as of May 2, 2018 (the “Purchase Agreement”),
as amended by that certain Letter Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2018, between Cleanspark and Pioneer (the “Original
Letter Agreement”). All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth
in the Purchase Agreement.


By execution hereof,
Cleanspark hereby agrees to extend the Termination Date as set forth in Section 8.1(d) of the Purchase Agreement, as amended by
the Original Letter Agreement, from October 15, 2018 until December 31, 2018 (the “Extension”). During
the Extension, all other terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


Sections 9.4 –
9.14 of the Purchase Agreement shall apply to this Agreement mutatis mutandis.


If you are in agreement
with the foregoing, please so indicate by your countersignature below.










	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	PIONEER CUSTOM ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CORP.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Nathan Mazurek	 
	 	Name:	Nathan Mazurek
	 	Title:	President











Agreed and Accepted
as of


this 16th day of July,
2018



	CLEANSPARK, INC.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Zachary Bradford	 	 
	Name:	Zachary Bradford	 
	Title:	President
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 68 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 68

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
         the Workforce in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2015

    Mr. Kline (for himself and Mr. Scott of Virginia) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
         the Workforce in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $14,044,580.00 for the 
One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,022,290.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $7,022,290.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019328EN.01005601.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/56

---

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB

(Case T-687/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority - Appointment of a contact person - Limited communication with the ECB - Procedural defects - Intermediary or preparatory measures - Rights of defence - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 328/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (Ta’Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: O. Behrends, M. Kirchner and L. Feddern, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Puidokas and A. Karpf, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the ECB’s email of 10 September 2018 in so far as, by that email, the ECB requested the applicant to direct its communications via the Competent Person appointed under Maltese law or with the Competent Person’s approval.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible;

| 2. | Pilatus Bank plc shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Pilatus Bank plc shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 239 (Thursday, December 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 8, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
134 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-101, CP2024-105.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-27412 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,650
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  47,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               48,668
<PP&E>                                         3,219,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,466,760)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 800,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88,033
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     712,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   800,934
<SALES>                                        205,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,161
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  459,076<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (312,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (312,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (312,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bella N. Hanna, Plaintiff-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>19 West 55th St. Property LLC, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>In consolidated actions, plaintiff appeals from (1) two judgments of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), each entered May 19, 2016, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the actions under index numbers 2047/15 and 2048/15 and (2) a judgment (same court and Judge), entered May 19, 2016, in favor of the defendant dismissing the action under index number 2049/15.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgments (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), each entered May 19, 2016, affirmed, without costs.</p><p>The record establishes that the trial court applied the appropriate rules and principles of substantive law and accomplished "substantial justice" in dismissing plaintiff-tenant's claims for personal injuries and property damages (<i>see</i> CCA 1804, 1807; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000], <i>lv dismissed </i>95 NY2d 898 [2000]). A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the court's finding that plaintiff failed to adduce evidence establishing that defendant-landlord's renovations at the building premises, which allegedly involved the use of a jackhammer, proximately caused any injury to plaintiff's ear or any damage to her refrigerator. Nor, in any event, did plaintiff adduce competent evidence of damages.</p><p>Plaintiff's action under index number 2049/15 was properly dismissed as being duplicative of her claim under index number 2047/14, and thus an improper attempt by plaintiff to circumvent the jurisdictional limit of the small claims court (<a href="../2006/2006_26397.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Swiss Hamlet Homeowners Assoc., Inc. v Souza</i>, 13 Misc 3d 87</a> [App Term, 2d Dept 2006]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 18, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>