alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION**

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this 10-K/A Report of Exabyte Corporation; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated:  January 10, 2006

                /s/ Carroll A. Wallace                                    

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2020061EN.01002901.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Gres de Aragón v EUIPO (GRES ARAGÓN)

(Case T-624/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Error of law)

(2020/C 61/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Gres de Aragón, SA (Alcalñiz, Spain) (represented by: J. Learte Álvarez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, H. O’Neill and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 August 2018 (Case R 2269/2017-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign GRES ARAGÓN as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2018 (Case R 2269/2017-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2018 (Case R 2269/2017-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: In re S. C. Maxwell Family Partnership, LTD.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00451

- CV

Trial court case number: 35517

Trial court: 335th District Court of Washington County

On June 3, 2014, relator S. C. Maxwell Family Partnership, Ltd. filed a petition for writ

of mandamus challenging the trial court’s May 6, 2014 order denying relator’s motion to transfer

venue. The Court requests a response to the pet ition for writ of mandamus from the real parties

in interest. It is ordered that the response of any interested party, if any, shall be due no later

than Thursday, August 7, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 10, 2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6839
MATTHEW DAVID ENDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGARY BROWN, Officer; THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT PRECINCT 12-DUNDALK LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MERRIT BLVD & WISE AVENUE; GARY DAVIS, Officer; MICHAEL DEPAULA, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 3868-AMD) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew David Enders, Appellant Pro Se. John Edward Beverungen, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Towson, Maryland; Jeffrey Grant Cook, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Enders v. Brown , No. CA-96-3868-AMD (D. Md. May 27, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27420]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 12 p.m., December 13, 2023.

PLACE: 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1) Litigation Matter.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to 
the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

     Dated: December 8, 2023.
Stephanie Hillyard,
Secretary to the Board.

    By unanimous, recorded vote of the Board members of the Railroad 
Retirement Board, such Board members determined that agency business 
required that this meeting be called with less than one week notice. 5 
U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).

[FR Doc. 2023-27420 Filed 12-11-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 2, 2005
    By:
    /s/ James A. Winne IIIJames A. Winne III, Chief Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director
 This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q/A and shall not be treated as having been filed as part
of the Form 10-Q/A. 24
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

PATRICIO SANTIAGO-VELASCO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10159 

D.C. No. 4:17-cr-01568-RM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019**

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Patricio Santiago-Velasco appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Santiago-Velasco’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10159 

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Santiago-Velasco the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
March 17, 1998

20776

#### Doe, In Interest of

Affirmed
Box Tree Moth

2024 Quick Reference

Program: Box Tree Moth

Application: ArcGIS Field Maps

Host: USDA-MRP Enterprise (portal)

Map Title: PPQ BTM [ST] Trapping and Visual 2024 Field Map

CHECK URL! https://maps.mrp.usda.gov/arcgis/

IMPORTANT!! You must synchronize your map at the beginning/end of each workday.

FOR ALL DATA ENTRY:

1. Open ArcGIS Field Maps. Confirm correct ArcGIS Enterprise URL.

2. Open previously downloaded map area & stand at the point you wish to 

collect. 

3. Tap the Layers icon & toggle ON the layers you wish to view/edit.

4. Tap the blue plus sign in the lower-right corner of the map to add data.

Visual Survey

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

1. Tap to select the pest status (Positive or Negative). 

2. Fill out the main data form. * Asterisks indicate mandatory fields. 

Verify the Survey Date field is Today.

3. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button to save the new survey 

record.

ArcGIS Field Maps 

Mobile Application

Credit: Alison Morris, Bugwood.org

Layers icon

Add data button
Last Updated: 6 February 2024 09:41 2

Trapping

Place a Trap

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

1. Tap to select “New BTM Trap Site 2024”

2. Complete the data form (Verify the Install Date field is Today.)

* Asterisks indicate mandatory fields. 

3. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

Trap Activity

1. Tap the trap symbol on the map to select it. The data form opens on the left.

2. Scroll down and tap "BTM Trap Activities 2024" or tap the link icon. 

3. Tap the blue Add button and complete the activities data form. 

Verify the Activity Date field is Today.

4. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

Relocate a Trap

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

On original trap, record:

1. Trap Activity: “BTM Trap Activities 2024” – Remove > Submit

2. Transport the trap to its new location and perform “Place a Trap” steps as above.

Map Notes Points

NOTE: These layers are meant to share information or hazards to all surveyors.

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

Select Hazard or Info options.

Complete the data form and tap the Submit button.

If the Submit button fails, you have not completed all required fields or GPS accuracy failed.

To preserve battery power, put the device to sleep between surveys. 

For more details, refer to the PPQ BTM [ST] Trapping and Visual User Manual.
#### Reeves v. Rogers

23628

04/23/2002

Vacated and remanded
# C_2019305EN.01004601.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN)

(Case T-54/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN - Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Audi alteram partem rule - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Cross claim)

(2019/C 305/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fashion Energy Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. Müller and F. Togo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Retail Royalty Co. (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA) (represented by: M. Dick, Solicitor, and J. Bogatz, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 November 2017 (Case R 693/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Retail Royalty and Fashion Energy.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 November 2017 (Case R 693/2017-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 November 2017 (Case R 693/2017-2);

| 2. | Dismisses the cross-claim as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the cross-claim as inadmissible;

| 3. | In the main appeal, EUIPO and Retail Royalty Co. are ordered to bear their own costs and to each bear half of the costs incurred by Fashion Energy Srl. |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the main appeal, EUIPO and Retail Royalty Co. are ordered to bear their own costs and to each bear half of the costs incurred by Fashion Energy Srl.

| 4. | In the cross-claim, Retail Royalty is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by Fashion Energy and EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the cross-claim, Retail Royalty is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by Fashion Energy and EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 9.4.2018.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1 
<CASH>                                         42,330
<SECURITIES>                                   97,306
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                   62
<INVENTORY>                                    599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,830
<PP&E>                                         3,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,091
<BONDS>                                        49,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       133
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,933
<SALES>                                        10,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,870
<CGS>                                          3,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                55,593
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            48,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                1,154
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   49,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  4.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.19
        


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2980

_____________________________

NICHOLAS O. O’QUINN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

July 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and M.K. THOMAS and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Olivia M. Goodman of O’Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Benjamin Hoffman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           67196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     368627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                            6206
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  499709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         248069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                      172592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    499709
<SALES>                                         320254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                333216
<CGS>                                           271401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   271401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 43100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18715
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              11491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     11491
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


December 13, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 283


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on December 12, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-213883) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                   
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
Brownish shell covers 

at least half the length 

of the snail

Eggs Hibernation

Can reach up to 8 inches long 

and 5 inches in diameter

LIFE CYCLE

GIANT 

AFRICAN 

SNAIL

Adult

Each mated snail can 

lay up to 1,200 eggs 

each year

The snail can survive 

in cold conditions and 

could winter in the 

Northern United States 

by slowing down, almost 

hibernating until spring
THEHARM IT CAUSES

This pest is one of the most damaging snails in the 

world because it can consume at least 500 di erent 

types of plants. It poses a serious health risk to 

humans since it can carry a parasite that can cause 

meningitis. The snails also damage buildings by 

eating plaster, stucco, and other calcium-rich 

materials needed to grow their shells. They have no 

natural enemies and reproduce rapidly, with each 

mated snail laying about 1,200 eggs each year. 

WHAT YOU CAN DO • Do not bring or mail fresh fruits, vegetables, or plants 

into your State or any other unless agricultural 

inspectors have cleared them beforehand. 

• Report any information on illegal snail smuggling/

import activity by calling the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture’s toll-free anti-smuggling hotline at 

1-800-877-3835.

• Allow authorized agricultural workers access to 

your property to inspect for the snail. 

• Report any sightings of this pest at HungryPests.com.

Infestation

BACK

WHAT TO LOOK FOR

• When fully grown, the shell 

consists of seven to nine whorls 

(spirals), with a long and greatly 

swollen body whorl.

• The brownish shell with darker 

brown lengthwise stripes 

covers at least half the length 

of the snail.

For more information visit: 

HUNGRYPESTS.COM

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

 Program Aid No. 2125-GAS Issued September 2012