alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018301EN.01001901.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 22 June 2018 — Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche

(Case C-410/18)

(2018/C 301/26)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal administratif

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nicolas Aubriet

Defendant: Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche

Question referred

Is the condition imposed on students not residing in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by Article 3(5)(b) of the amended Law of 24 July 2014 on State financial aid for higher education studies, which does not take into account any other connecting factor, that is to say, the condition that they must be the children of workers who have been employed or have carried out their activity in Luxembourg for a period of at least five years in the course of a reference period of seven years at the time at which the application for financial aid is made, necessary in order to attain the objective put forward by the Luxembourg legislature, namely that of bringing about an increase in the proportion of persons with a higher education degree?

---
# C_2019432EN.01004101.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 –EPSU and Goudriaan v Commission

(Case T-310/18) (1)

(Social policy - Dialogue between the social partners at EU level - Agreement entitled ‘General framework for informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations’ - Joint request of the signatory parties seeking the implementation of that agreement at EU level - Refusal by the Commission to submit a proposal for a decision to the Council - Action for annulment - Challengeable act - Admissibility - Commission’s discretion - Autonomy of the social partners - Principle of subsidiarity - Proportionality)

(2019/C 432/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) (Brussels (Belgium) and Jan Goudriaan (Brussels) (represented by: R. Arthur, Solicitor, and by R. Palmer and K. Apps, Barristers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Martínez del Peral, M. van Beek and M. Kellerbauer, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 5 March 2018 refusing to submit to the Council of the European Union a proposal for a decision to implement the agreement entitled ‘General framework for informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations’, signed by the Trade Unions’ National and European Administration Delegation (TUNED) and European Public Administration Employers (EUPAE) on 21 December 2015.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Goudriaan, and the European Commission to each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Goudriaan, and the European Commission to each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

---
# C_2019131EN.01002101.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) lodged on 28 December 2018 — PF and Others v Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße

(Case C-830/18)

(2019/C 131/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße

Respondents: PF and Others

Other party: Vertreter des öffentlichen Interesses

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a provision of national law limiting the obligation of national local authorities (districts) regarding school transport to the residents of the wider constituent state (Land) has an indirectly discriminatory effect, even if it is established, on the basis of the factual circumstances, that the residence requirement quite predominantly excludes residents of the rest of the territory of the Member State from the benefit?
  If Question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a provision of national law limiting the obligation of national local authorities (districts) regarding school transport to the residents of the wider constituent state (Land) has an indirectly discriminatory effect, even if it is established, on the basis of the factual circumstances, that the residence requirement quite predominantly excludes residents of the rest of the territory of the Member State from the benefit?

If Question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative:

| 2. | Does the effective organisation of the school system constitute an imperative requirement of public interest which is capable of justifying indirect discrimination? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the effective organisation of the school system constitute an imperative requirement of public interest which is capable of justifying indirect discrimination?

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.

---
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will hold five virtual listening sessions 

to receive public input on topics related to updates and improvements to the Chronic Wasting 

Disease (CWD) Herd Certification Program Standards. Section 603 of the Fiscal Year 2023 

Omnibus Appropriations Bill enacted the Chronic Wasting Disease Research and Management 

Act (H.R. 5608, the CWD Research and Management Act). Under the terms of the CWD 

Research and Management Act, APHIS must “solicit public feedback on potential updates and 

improvements” to the Chronic Wasting Disease Herd Certification Program Standards. Pursuant 

to the CWD Research and Management Act, APHIS is publishing this notice soliciting public 

feedback on potential updates and improvements to the CWD Program Standards. Specifically, 

we are scheduling a series of virtual listening sessions to gather information that will help us in 

evaluating and potentially amending the Program Standards consistent with the CWD Research 

and Management Act. The deadline to register to speak at the third listening session is August 10, 

2023, and one week prior to subsequent listening sessions. You may provide written comments at 

the meetings by using the meeting chat function or file written comments before, during, or after 

the meetings by emailing CWD@usda.gov or mailing to Dr. Hillary A. McManama, Veterinary 

Medical Officer, Cervid Health Staff, Strategy and Policy, Veterinary Services, APHIS; c/o Ms. 

Melanie Rouse, 4700 River Road Unit 43, Riverdale, MD 20737. Written comments by attendees 

or other interested stakeholders will be welcomed for the public record up to close of business on 

Monday, November 13, 2023. Please refer to Docket No. APHIS-2023-0042 when submitting 

your comments.

Meeting topics for Listening Session #3:

• surveillance

• use of antemortem testing and associated biosecurity including reuse of 

instruments between herds and or animals 

• postmortem sampling

• penalties for HCP non-compliance

Specific questions we are seeking input on:

• Should reuse of instruments between herds and or animals be prohibited?

Instructions and expectations for speakers during the call:

-The listening session will be recorded.

-You must have indicated on the registration form that you wish to speak during the 

listening session. A predetermined order will be followed for those that indicated they 

wish to speak during the session. The facilitator will call on you when it is your turn to 

speak.

-Please introduce yourself by name and affiliation at the start of your comments.

-Comments will be limited to a maximum of 3 to 5 minutes depending on the number of 

requests to speak. The facilitator will let you know before the call how long the 

comments can be and let you know when you have 30 seconds left.

-Keep the discussion focused on the meeting topics and respectful.

-Focus on interests, not on positions.

-Be specific—Use examples.

-Refrain from using profanity or distracting the group.
#### State v. Imanil

20707

2/11/98

Vacated and Remanded
Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ MICHAEL L. BENNETT
    
    /s/ DANIEL D. GREENWELLMichael L. Bennett
    
    Daniel D. GreenwellPresident and Chairman of the Board
    
    Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerDirector (Principal Executive Officer)
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Dated: July 25, 2008
    
    Dated: July 25, 2008
May 3, 2006

27027

#### State v. Johnson

Affirmed
# C_2019399EN.01005501.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology)

(Case T-634/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 399/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: André Geske (Lübeck, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2018 (Case R 2721/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign revolutionary air pulse technology as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr André Geske to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr André Geske to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.

---
##### 



Exhibit 12.3
 Central Illinois Public Service Company
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined
Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Ratios)
 Year Ended December 31,2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006Net income from continuing operations
    
    $
    26,355
    
    
    $
    28,474
    
    
    $
    32,463
    
    
    $
    42,998
    
    
    $
    37,372Add- Taxes based on income
    
    
    16,955
    
    
    
    6,245
    
    
    
    16,135
    
    
    
    24,596
    
    
    
    15,539Net income before income taxes
    
    
    43,310
    
    
    
    34,719
    
    
    
    48,598
    
    
    
    67,594
    
    
    
    52,911Add- fixed charges:Interest on long term debt
    
    
    39,603
    
    
    
    33,118
    
    
    
    31,372
    
    
    
    28,969
    
    
    
    29,932Estimated interest cost within rental expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    726Amortization of net debt premium, discount,
and expenses
    
    
    1,076
    
    
    
    935
    
    
    
    903
    
    
    
    953
    
    
    
    1,025Total fixed charges
    
    
    40,679
    
    
    
    34,053
    
    
    
    32,275
    
    
    
    29,922
    
    
    
    31,683Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    
    83,989
    
    
    
    68,772
    
    
    
    80,873
    
    
    
    97,516
    
    
    
    84,594Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.06
    
    
    
    2.01
    
    
    
    2.50
    
    
    
    3.25
    
    
    
    2.67Earnings required for combined fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    
    2,973
    
    
    
    2,512
    
    
    
    2,512
    
    
    
    2,512Adjustment to pre-tax basis
    
    
    2,031
    
    
    
    651
    
    
    
    1,248
    
    
    
    1,437
    
    
    
    1,0455,189
    
    
    
    3,624
    
    
    
    3,760
    
    
    
    3,949
    
    
    
    3,557Combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividend requirements
    
    $
    45,868
    
    
    $
    37,677
    
    
    $
    36,035
    
    
    $
    33,871
    
    
    $
    35,240Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividend requirements
    
    
    1.83
    
    
    
    1.82
    
    
    
    2.24
    
    
    
    2.87
    
    
    
    2.40
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

1.   Fonix Systems Corporation, a Utah corporation,  wholly owned by the Company
     (merged into Fonix Corporation effective September 1, 1999)

2.   Fonix/AcuVoice, Inc., a Utah corporation, wholly owned by the Company

3.   Fonix/Articulate,  Inc.,  a Utah  corporation,  wholly owned by the Company
     (merged into Fonix Corporation effective September 1, 1999)

4.   Fonix/Papyrus, Inc., a Utah corporation, wholly owned by the Company

5.   Fonix UK Ltd, wholly owned by the Company

6.   Fonix Sales, Korea Group, Ltd., wholly owned by the Company
Exhibit 23.1


      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Financial Federal Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-139318 and 333-50962) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-
116806) on Form S-3 of Financial Federal Corporation of our reports
dated September 24, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Financial Federal Corporation and subsidiaries as of July
31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended July 31, 2008, and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2008,
which reports appear in the July 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K
of Financial Federal Corporation.


New York, New York
September 24, 2008
# C_2019148EN.01005101.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Laverana v EUIPO — Agroecopark (VERA GREEN)

(Case T-106/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark VERA GREEN - Earlier EU word mark LAVERA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 148/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented initially by J. Wachinger, M. Zöbisch and R. Drozdz, then by N. Schmitz and J. Bittner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Agroecopark, SL (Majadahonda, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and C. Serrano Rodríguez, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 December 2017 (Case R 982/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Laverana and Agroecopark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laverana GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laverana GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---
Aroostook

Somerset

Piscataquis

Penobscot

Oxford

Washington

Franklin

York

Hancock

Waldo Kennebec

Cumberland

Lincoln

Knox Androscoggin

Sagadahoc

Knox

μ

0 25 50

Miles

USDA/APHIS/PPQ

Da ta sources:USDA/APHIS/PPQ ,

Townsh ip la yer:MEGIS

Ma p b ydb opp,Geog ra p h er,USDA/APHIS/PPQ

Novem b er2017

New

Hampshire

Quebec

New

Bru

nswick

Plea sec onsult yourSta teorFedera l

pla nt protec tion inspec tororyourc ounty

a g ent fora ssista nc ereg a rding exa c t a rea s

underreg ula tion a ndrequirem ents for

m oving reg ula teda rtic les.

Fordeta iledinform a tion see:7CFR301.91

[ 0 250 500Miles

State of Maine locator within continental United States

Sta teof Ma ine

USsta tes

Map Key

Europea n La rc h Ca nkerReg ula tedArea

Ma inec ountyb ounda ries

Ma inetown b ounda ries

DISCLAIMER:Th eseda t a ,a nda llth einfo rm a tion c on ta inedth erein,

h a veb een c o llectedb yth eU.S.Depa rtm ent of Ag ric ulture's

Anim a la ndPla n t Hea lth In spec tion Servic e(APHIS),

or b yits c oo pera tors on APHIS’b eh a lf,f or restric tedg overnm ent

purpo ses on lya ndis th esolep ro pertyo f APHIS.Da ta m a yb e

dissem in a tedon a need-to-knowb a sis onlya ndm ust b eused

for th eirintendedg overn m ent purpose(s).Allin form a tion c ont a ined

with in th eseda ta a resub jec t to requiredFedera lsa feg ua rds a nd

sh a llon lyb esh a reda nd/orusedc o nsistent with th eTra deSec rets Ac t

[18U.S.C.1905],th ePriva c yAc t of 1974,a s a m ended

[5U.S.C.552a ],th eFreedo m o f In form a tion Ac t [5U.S.C.552],

th ec onfidentia lityp rovision s of th eFoodSec urityAc t of 1985

[7U.S.C.2276],Sec tion 1619of t h eFo od,Co nserva t io n,a nd

Energ yAc t of 2008[7U.S.C.8791],a ndo th er a pp lic a b leFedera lla ws

a ndim plem en ting reg ula tio ns,a s wella s with t h ec o nfidentia lityo r

non-disc losureprovisio ns o f a nyoth er a g reem ent enteredin to b etween

APHISa nda c oo pera t or.

United States

Department of

Agriculture

European Larch Canker (Lachnellula willkommi)

Regulated Area in State of Maine

M a i n e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000880114
<NAME> BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,860
<PP&E>                                         581,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 274,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,868
<BONDS>                                        352,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,023
<OTHER-SE>                                    (50,039)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   373,287
<SALES>                                         98,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,351
<CGS>                                           54,968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,988)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,702)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 793 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 5, 2016. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1270) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 

amendments made by the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act which disqualify expenses for over-the-counter drugs 

under health savings accounts and health flexible spending 

arrangements. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a 

substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 

Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature 

of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee 

Print 114–60 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and rank-
2 

•HRES 793 EH 

ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2019255EN.01003501.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Rietze v EUIPO — Volkswagen (VW Bus T 5 vehicle)

(Case T-43/18) (1)

(Community designs - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing the VW Bus T 5 vehicle - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Informed user - Different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

(2019/C 255/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rietze GmbH & Co. KG (Altdorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Klawitter, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2017 (Case R 1204/2016-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Rietze and Volkswagen.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rietze GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rietze GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---