alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO S

. PD

- 0 117

- 21 & PD

- 0 118

- 21

JAMES EARL WARREN , App ellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TWELF TH COURT OF APPEALS

SMITH COUNTY

Y EARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion in which S LAUGHTER , J., joined

.

DISSENTING OPINION

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion in Dulin v. State , ___ S.W.3d ___,

No s . PD

- 0856

- 19 & PD

- 1857

- 19 , 2021 WL 1202400 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021), I

respectfully dissent to the Court’s disposition of the State’s petition for discretionary

review.

FIL ED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### Armbruster v. County of Hawai'i

19197

4/16/97

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2019357EN.01003201.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2019 — Executive Selling v EUIPO (EXECUTIVE SELLING)

(Case T-689/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark EXECUTIVE SELLING - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 357/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Executive Selling (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Bouchara and A. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2018 (Case R 313/2018-1), concerning an international registration designating the European Union of figurative sign EXECUTIVE SELLING.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Executive Selling to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Executive Selling to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.

---
August 24, 2006

27154

#### A & B Properties, Inc. v. Dick Pacific Const. Co., Ltd.

Affirmed
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron
Markovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




March 31,
2009




/s/
      Miron MarkovitzMiron MarkovitzChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Interpore International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 29, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ David C. Mercer                              
|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|                      |  |  |  | David C. Mercer                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interpore International, Inc. and will be retained by Interpore International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019065EN.01002101.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/21

---

Appeal brought on 14 August 2018 by Emcur Gesundheitsmittel aus Bad Ems GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 14 June 2018 in Case T-165/17: Emcur v EUIPO

(Case C-533/18 P)

(2019/C 65/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Emcur Gesundheitsmittel aus Bad Ems GmbH (represented by: K. Bröcker, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 8 January 2019 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                                  Additional Exhibit

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

                                 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003

/s/ Michael R. Farris
---------------------
Name: Michael R. Farris
Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LaserSight Incorporated and will be retained by LaserSight
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                  Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003

/s/ Richard R. Confessore
-------------------------
Name: Richard R. Confessore
Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LaserSight Incorporated and will be retained by LaserSight
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 702 

Celebrating the contributions of small businesses and entrepreneurs in every 

community in the United States during ‘‘National Small Business Week’’, 

beginning on May 1 through May 7, 2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2016 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. KING of Iowa, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Ms. HAHN, Mr. HANNA, Mr. PAYNE, 

Mr. HUELSKAMP, Ms. MENG, Mr. GIBSON, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. BRAT, 

Mr. TAKAI, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. KNIGHT, 

Ms. ADAMS, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. HARDY, Mr. 

KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. TIPTON, and Mr. CA ́RDENAS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the contributions of small businesses and entrepreneurs in every community in the United States during 

‘‘National Small Business Week’’, beginning on May 1 

through May 7, 2016. 

Whereas ‘‘National Small Business Week’’ has been declared 

by every President since 1963; 

Whereas there are more than 28,000,000 small businesses in 

the United States; 

Whereas small businesses represent 99.7 percent of all businesses with employees in the United States; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 702 IH 

Whereas small businesses employ over 48 percent of the employees in the private sector in the United States; 

Whereas nearly 90 percent of United States employers have 

less than 20 employees; 

Whereas small businesses constitute 98 percent of firms exporting goods; 

Whereas small businesses are responsible for more than 46 

percent of private sector output; 

Whereas small businesses are responsible for creating 63 percent of new jobs; and 

Whereas May 1, 2016, through May 7, 2016, will be celebrated as ‘‘National Small Business Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) celebrates the contributions of small busi3 nesses and entrepreneurs in every community in the 

4 United States during ‘‘National Small Business 

5 Week’’; 

6 (2) supports the designation of ‘‘National Small 

7 Business Week’’; 

8 (3) recognizes the importance of creating poli9 cies which promote an environment in which small 

10 businesses may succeed; and 

11 (4) supports efforts to— 

12 (A) encourage consumers to utilize small 

13 businesses; and 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 702 IH 

1 (B) increase awareness of the value of 

2 small businesses and the impact small busi3 nesses have on the economy of the United 

4 States. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-440-LR; ASLBP No. 24-982-01-LR-BD01]


Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp.; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding: Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., 
(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1).
    This proceeding involves an application seeking a twenty-year 
license renewal of Facility Operating License NPF-58 to authorize 
Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. to operate Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 
1 until November 7, 2046. In response to a notice published in the 
Federal Register announcing the opportunity to request a hearing, see 
88 FR 67373 (Sept. 29, 2023), a hearing request was filed on November 
28, 2023 on behalf of Ohio Nuclear-Free Network and Beyond Nuclear.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:

Michael M. Gibson, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Nicolas G. Trikouros, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.

    Rockville, Maryland.

    Dated: December 4, 2023.
Edward R. Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2023-26947 Filed 12-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1 - CEO 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel J. Kocher, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: November 15, 2004.


                                           /s/ Joel J. Kocher
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Joel J. Kocher
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14655]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 38

RIN 3038-0092, -0094

Customer Clearing Documentation, Timing of Acceptance for 
Clearing, and Clearing Member Risk Management; Core Principles and 
Other Requirements for Designated Contract Markets; Correction

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects incorrect text published in the Federal 
Register of April 9, 2012, and June 19, 2012, regarding Customer 
Clearing Documentation, Timing of Acceptance for Clearing, and Clearing 
Member Risk Management, and Core Principles and Other Requirements for 
Designated Contract Markets.

DATES: The corrections to FR Doc. 2012-7477 are effective October 1, 
2012. The corrections to FR Doc. 2012-12746 are effective August 20, 
2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John C. Lawton, Deputy Director, 202-
418-5480, jlawton@cftc.gov, and Christopher A. Hower, Attorney-Advisor, 
202-418-6703, chower@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing and Risk, and 
Camden Nunery, Economist, 202-418-5723, Office of the Chief Economist, 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st 
Street NW., Washington, DC 20581; and Hugh J. Rooney, Assistant 
Director, 312-596-0574, hrooney@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing and 
Risk, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 525 West Monroe Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60661.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2012-7477 appearing on page 21278 
in the Federal Register issue of Monday, April 9, 2012, the following 
corrections are made:

0
1. On page 21309, in the left column, amendatory instruction 16 is 
removed.
0
2. On page 21309, in the middle column, amendatory instruction 17 and 
subpart L (consisting of Sec. Sec.  38.600 through 38.606) are removed.
0
3. On page 21309, in the middle column, amendatory instructions 18 and 
19 are redesignated as amendatory instructions 16 and 17.
    In FR Doc. 2012-12746 appearing on page 36612 in the Federal 
Register issue of Tuesday, June 19, 2012, the following correction is 
made:
0
4. On page 36705, in the left column, add paragraph (b) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  38.601  Mandatory clearing.

* * * * *
    (b) A designated contract market must coordinate with each 
derivatives clearing organization to which it submits transactions for 
clearing, in the development of rules and procedures to facilitate 
prompt and efficient transaction processing in accordance with the 
requirements of Sec.  39.12(b)(7) of this chapter.

    Dated: June 8, 2012.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-14655 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
# C_2019255EN.01004201.xml

| 29.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2019 — Bernaldo de Quirós v Commission

(Case T-273/18) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary measures - Disciplinary procedure - Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service - Administrative investigation - Mandate given to IDOC - Principle of impartiality - Principle of good administration - Rights of the defence - Disciplinary procedure - Principle of equality of arms - Disciplinary penalty of a reprimand - Proportionality - Non-material damage)

(2019/C 255/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Belén Bernaldo de Quirós (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by G. Berscheid, B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of Commission decision of 6 July 2017 imposing the penalty of a reprimand on the applicant under Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, and, where appropriate, of the decision of 31 January 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against that decision and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Belén Bernaldo de Quirós to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Belén Bernaldo de Quirós to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
# C_2021263EN.01001501.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v Commission

(Case T-254/18) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Association - Standing to bring proceedings - Interest in bringing proceedings - Injury determination - Calculation of the import volume - Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators - Sampling - Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production - Prices charged intra-group - Causal link - Attribution and non-attribution analysis - No assessment of injury by segment - Assessment of the significance of undercutting - Confidential treatment of information - Rights of the defence - PCN-by-PCN methodology - Product comparability - Calculation of the normal value - Analogue country - Adjustment for VAT - Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit)

(2021/C 263/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (Beijing, China), and the nine other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: EJ Picardie (Saint-Crépin-Ibouvillers, France), and the seven other interveners whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: U. O’Dwyer, B. O’Connor, Solicitors, and M. Hommé, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/140 of 29 January 2018 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain cast iron articles originating in the People’s Republic of China and terminating the investigation on imports of certain cast iron articles originating in India (OJ 2018 L 25, p. 6), in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.

---
# C_2019131EN.01005802.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/58

---

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Hangzhou Lezoo traveling equipment v EUIPO — Promotional Traders

(GREEN HERMIT)

(Case T-60/18) (1)

(2019/C 131/68)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.

---
#### Chancie JONES, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12378.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 9, 1957.

Robert Wheeler, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

POWELL, Judge.

Chancie Jones, the appellant, was tried in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. He was tried before the court, without the intervention of a jury.

Defendant had first filed a motion to suppress the evidence, and after hearing, stipulated that the evidence heard thereon might be considered as the evidence in the case, and .the court overruled the motion to suppress and found the defendant guilty as charged, and assessed punishment at imprisonment in the county jail of Tulsa County for thirty days, and a fine of $50.

Although a brief was due to be filed in this court August 4, 1956, none has ever been filed, and no one appeared before this court on December 5, 1956, when the case was set for oral argument. We find no error in the record, and the uniform hold*358ings of this court require affirmance. Fitzgerald v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 409, 142 P.2d 131; Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771; Wilson v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 421, 209 P.2d 512, 212 P.2d 144; Butler v. State, Okl.Cr., 269 P.2d 1001; Redding v. State, Okl.Cr., 301 P.2d 371.

The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.