alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(the "Reform Act") and 14 C.F. R. Part 11, Eagle Sight Photographer LLC, 

seeks an exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") detailed 

below for the following described Unmanned Aerial System called in this 

application the ME System, which includes an Unmanned Aircraft (UA) and 

ground station-based equipment and crew: 

THE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT (UA): 

lightweight (20 lb gross weight with all on-board equipment), manufactured 

by DJI, Phantom , that includes the following equipment in flight;[¥] An 

on-board flight computer with GPS navigation and location ability that 

receives signals for flight controls from a ground-based 

transmitter/controller; 

on-board camera capable of capturing imagery in the form of full color, 

high definition still photos and video; 

A 5.8 GHz on-board radio transmitter that transmits live video from the onboard camera plus all the flight data from the telemetry system described 

above; 

THE GROUD STATION -BASED PART OF THE SYSTEM: 

A Pilot in Command (PIC) in operational control of a flight operation from 

beginning to end and who controls the UA while in the air; 

5.8 GHz radio transmitter/controller operated by the PIC to control the UA 

while in flight; ["?J A radio receiver receiving live video and flight data from 

the on-board camera and computer projects it all together onto a screen 

for the PIC to view during flight;t?.J A Visual Observer (VO) is a person 

who provides a second pair of eyes to visually track the UA while in flight.
April 2, 2001

23290

#### Doe Children, In re

Affirmed
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-31165

Summary Calendar

MARCIA R. MODICA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON THE BEHALF OF HER MINOR,

CHILDREN, STEPHEN DANIEL MODICA AND JONATHAN DAVID MODICA,

AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN FRANCIS MODICA

 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

CLIFTON HILL, SR., ET AL,

Defendants.

SUNDERLAND MARINE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

96-CV-1121

November 26, 1997

Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stephen Modica suffered fatal injuries during a recreational

diving expedition aboard the M/V MISTER CLIFF, a commercial fishing

vessel. Modica belonged to “Hell Divers,” a recreational diving

club that had chartered the boat for a three-day spear fishing

trip. Marcia Modica, the decedent’s widow, filed a wrongful death
 

2 Whether an insurance contract is ambiguous is a legal

determination that we review de novo on appeal. Lloyds of London

v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., 101 F.3d 425, 429 (5th

Cir. 1996).

2

action against several parties, including the boat’s insurer,

Sunderland Marine Mutual Insurance Co, Ltd. The district court

granted partial summary judgment in Sunderland’s favor on the basis

of its finding that the language of the insurance policy excluded

coverage for Stephen Modica’s death. The plaintiff appeals from

that judgment. We affirm. 

The policy issued by Sunderland to Mister Cliff, Inc. excludes

coverage for:

(K) Any liability for, or any loss, damage or expense while

engaged in, or resulting from, any commercial diving operation

or service from the vessel, except, however, any liability

incurred when the vessel’s crew is engaged in inspection or

repair or the vessel which could not be deferred until

commercial divers were available.

The plaintiff urges that the term “commercial diver,” as it appears

in Exclusion K, is ambiguous. We find no ambiguity in this

language.2 At the time of the accident, the vessel was being used

for commercial diving-- precisely the activity for which Exclusion

K denies coverage. We are not persuaded by the plaintiff’s

contention that the recreational nature of the expedition precludes

a finding that the vessel was being used for commercial diving. 

Exclusion K refers to the activity in which the insured is engaged,

not to the activity of the injured party for whom the insured may

be responsible. The owners of the M/V MISTER CLIFF received a

handsome fee for their services. As such, the insured was engaged
 

3 Because we affirm on this basis, we need not reach the

substance of the plaintiff’s remaining arguments.

3

in commercial diving as contemplated by Exclusion K. Sunderland is

not liable under the explicit, unambiguous terms of the policy.3

The judgment of the district court dismissing Sunderland from

the suit with prejudice is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-358-A; CA-03-670-A) Submitted: June 9, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lora has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
R. Eugene Goodson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Williams Controls Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: December 24, 2003 |  | /s/R. EUGENE GOODSONR. Eugene Goodson Chief Executive
Officer
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheet as of 12/29/96  and the  Consolidated  Statement of
Operations for the year ended 12/29/96.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                         3,934
<SECURITIES>                                   1,958
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,908 <F1>   
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,416   
<PP&E>                                        69,806 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               112,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         19,968
<BONDS>                                       68,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,079
<OTHER-SE>                                    17,286   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 112,258  
<SALES>                                      156,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             162,752
<CGS>                                         53,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                158,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  49
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                5,280
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.12
<FN>
<F1> The asset values for receivables and PP&E represent net amounts.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# C_2019363EN.01001401.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/14

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2019 — Romańska v Frontex

(Case T-212/18) (1)

(Civil Service - Contract Staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Termination - Grounds for termination - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Discrimination and psychological harassment - Compensation claim - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 363/20)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Karolina Romańska (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: A. Tetkowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: H. Caniard and S. Drew, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Currall and G. Ostaszewski, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 14 June 2017 by which the Executive Director of Frontex, acting as the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment, terminated the applicant’s employment contract with effect at the end of an eight-month notice period and, secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered on account of discrimination and psychological harassment by Frontex which culminated in the decision to terminate her contract.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Karolina Romańska shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Karolina Romańska shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.

---
# C_2019383EN.01006101.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/61

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2019 — BQ v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-66/18) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Call for tenders of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Freelance translators - Selection procedure - Rejection of a tenderer’s offer - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)

(2019/C 383/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BQ (represented by: E. Kleani, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram, Á. Almendros Manzano and V. Hanley-Emilsson, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 23 November 2017 rejecting the applicant’s tender for the conclusion of a framework contract for the translation of legal texts from German into Greek.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BQ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BQ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
MicroTel International, Inc.


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-74281, 333-71035, 333-69571, 33-22518, 33-72926 and
333-12567) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 3, 2000, except as to the
penultimate paragraph of Note 9 which is as of November 17, 2000, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
MicroTel International, Inc. appearing in Amendment No.2 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. Our report contains an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.




                                      BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



Orange County, California
December 29, 2000
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements and Related Prospectuses (Forms S-3 No. 333-84402 and No. 333-42245; and Forms S-8 No. 333-95282, No. 333-3438, No. 333-26135, No. 333-44281, No. 333-50679,No. 333-76991, No. 333-33944, No. 333-56800, No. 333-84404, No. 333-101378, No. 333-115494, No. 333-144006 and No. 333-148184) of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. of our report dated May 24, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2006, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2008. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Jose,California 

December 15, 2008
# C_2020027EN.01003202.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Mélin v Parliament

(Case T-726/18) ( (1))

(Law governing the institutions - Rules governing expenses and allowances payable to Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid - Obligation to state reasons - Failure to provide the annex to the decision ordering recovery)

(2020/C 27/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Joëlle Melin (Aubagne, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 4 October 2018 concerning the recovery from the applicant of a sum of EUR 130 339,35 unduly paid as parliamentary assistance and the corresponding debit note of 10 October 2018.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 4 October 2018 concerning the recovery from Joëlle Mélin of a sum of EUR 130 339,35 unduly paid as parliamentary assistance and of the corresponding debit note of 10 October 2018; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 4 October 2018 concerning the recovery from Joëlle Mélin of a sum of EUR 130 339,35 unduly paid as parliamentary assistance and of the corresponding debit note of 10 October 2018;

| 2) | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  (1) OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J EFFREY R. SMITH , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 367 LT Case No. 2008

- CF

- 11755

- A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed May 24, 2022 3.850 A ppeal f rom the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Tesha Ballou , Judge. J effre y R

. Smith , Moore Haven, p ro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A FFIRMED.

EVAN DER , EDWARDS and WOZNIAK , JJ., concur

.
23532

#### State v. Tupuola

Affirmed
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference in Registration  Statement Nos. 333-31425,  333-40603 and 333-50265 on
Form S-3 and 333-11549,  333-25925, 333-37137 and 333-74769 on Form S-8 of Fonix
Corporation  of our report dated April 14, 1999 included in Fonix  Corporation's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
April 14, 1999
# C_2019164EN.01005002.xml

| 13.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/50

---

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — Haba Trading v EUIPO — Vida (vidaXL)

(Case T-503/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 164/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Haba Trading BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Schneiders and A. Brittner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Vida AB (Alvesta, Sweden)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 (Case R 190/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Vida AB and Haba Trading BV.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Haba Trading BV is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Haba Trading BV is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 670 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 670

Expressing support for the designation of May 5, 2016, as a ``National 
    Day of Reason'' and recognizing the importance of reason in the 
                        betterment of humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2016

    Mr. Honda (for himself and Ms. Norton) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May 5, 2016, as a ``National 
    Day of Reason'' and recognizing the importance of reason in the 
                        betterment of humanity.

Whereas the application of reason has proven to offer hope for human survival 
        upon Earth, improving conditions within the universe, and cultivating 
        intelligent, moral, and ethical interactions among people and their 
        environments;
Whereas those who wrote the Constitution of the United States, the basic 
        document for governing the affairs of humankind within the United 
        States, based it upon principles delineated within the philosophies 
        distinguishing the historical Age of Reason;
Whereas most citizens of the United States purport to value reason and its 
        application;
Whereas it is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to promote the 
        development and application of reason; and
Whereas May 5, 2016, would be an appropriate date to designate as a ``National 
        Day of Reason'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Day of Reason''; 
        and
            (2) encourages all citizens, residents, and visitors to 
        join in observing this day and focusing upon the employment of 
        reason, critical thought, the scientific method, and free 
        inquiry to the resolution of human problems and for the welfare 
        of humankind.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Jubilado

16485

3/08/95

Reversed
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of First Financial Service Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company;

 

 

 

 

 
| Date: March 15, 2005 | By:    | /s/ B. Keith Johnson                   |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | B. Keith Johnson                       |
|                 |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 
| Date: March 15, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Gregory Schreacke                                  |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Gregory Schreacke                                      |
|                 |   | Chief Financial  Officer  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been providedto us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----