85240 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Mattresses from Indonesia: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2022, 88 FR 37027 (June 6, 2023) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated September 15, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2020– 

2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Mattresses from Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia, 

Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Republic of Turkey, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 

Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order). 

5See the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661 (September 1, 2020). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Cash 

Deposit Rate for Non-Selected Companies,’’ dated 

December 1, 2023. 

8We are treating these companies as a single 

entity for purposes of this review. For a complete 

discussion, see Memorandum, ‘‘Affiliation and 

Collapsing of PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT 

Grantec Jaya Indonesia,’’ dated December 8, 2022. 

9See Appendix II for a list of these companies. 

10See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–26859 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–560–836] 

Mattresses From Indonesia: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT Grantec 

Jaya Indonesia (collectively, Ecos/ 

Grantec) and PT Zinus Global Indonesia 

(Zinus) made sales of subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below normal value (NV) during 

the period of review (POR), November 3, 

2020, through April 30, 2022. 

Commerce further determines that sales 

of subject merchandise made by the 

non-individually examined companies 

were at prices below NV. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Johnson or Brian Smith, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4929 or 

(202) 482–1766, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 6, 2023, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. On September 15, 

2023, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the final results of this 

administrative review until December 1, 

2023.2 For a summary of the events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is mattresses from Indonesia. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs filed in this 

administrative review in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is included in 

Appendix I. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade/gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received and our findings at 

verification, we have made changes to 

the margin calculations in the 

Preliminary Results for both Ecos/ 

Grantec and Zinus.5

Rate for Non-Examined Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be determined for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. 

In this review, we calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

8.40 percent and 6.75 percent for Ecos/ 

Grantec and Zinus, respectively. With 

two respondents under individual 

examination, Commerce normally 

calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the 

estimated dumping rates calculated for 

the examined respondents; (B) a simple 

average of the estimated dumping rates 

calculated for the examined 

respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 

of the estimated dumping rates 

calculated for the examined respondents 

using each company’s publicly-ranged 

U.S. sales values for the merchandise 

under consideration. Commerce then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects 

the rates closest to (A) as the most 

appropriate rate for all other producers 

and exporters.6 As a result of this 

comparison, we assigned a dumping 

margin of 7.04 percent to the nonexamined companies.7

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the POR: 

Exporter or producer 

Weighted 

-average 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia/PT 

Grantec Jaya Indonesia 8 .. 8.40 

PT Zinus Global Indonesia ... 6.75 

Non-Examined Companies 9 7.04 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.10

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these final results of 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85241 

11See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012). 

12For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 13See Order. 

review to interested parties within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because Ecos/Grantec and Zinus 

reported the entered value for their U.S. 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those sales. Where an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.11

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Ecos/Grantec or Zinus for which the 

reviewed companies did not know that 

the merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.12

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we 

assigned an assessment rate based on 

the review-specific average rate, 

calculated as noted in the ‘‘Rate for 

Non-Examined Respondents’’ section, 

above. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rates for the reviewed 

companies will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review; (2) for producers or exporters 

not covered in this review but covered 

in a prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the most recently 

completed segment; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will continue to be 2.22 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation in this 

proceeding.13 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 1, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

General 

Comment 1: Calculation of Constructed 

Value Profit, Selling Expense, and 

Constructed Export Price Profit Ratios 

Ecos/Grantec 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Use Facts Available When Applying the 

Transactions Disregarded Rule 

Comment 3: Whether Ecos/Grantec Failed 

to Report Sales and Cost Data for Subject 

Merchandise 

Comment 4: Treatment of Allowances 

Zinus 

Comment 5: Whether Zinus’ Reported 

Export Price Sales Should Be Considered 

As Constructed Export Price Sales 

Comment 6: Zinus KR’s Indirect Selling 

Expenses 

Comment 7: Calculation of Zinus KR’s 

General and Administrative Expenses 

Comment 8: Treatment of Zinus’ Unpaid 

Balances 

Comment 9: Treatment of U.S. Sales of B 

Grade Mattresses 

Comment 10: Treatment of Zinus KR’s 

Research and Development Expenses 

Comment 11: Appropriate Customer Code 

for Differential Pricing Analysis 

Comment 12: Treatment of Advertising 

Expenses 

Comment 13: Accounting for Scrap Offset 

Comment 14: Application of Exchange Rate 

to Zinus Indonesia’s Costs 

Comment 15: Recalculation of Credit 

Expenses (CREDIT2U) 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

1. Bali Natural Latex 

2. CV. Aumireta Anggun 

3. CV. Lautan Rezeki 

4. Duta Abadi Primantara, Pt 

5. Ecos Jaya JL Pasir Awi 

6. Mimpi 

7. PT. Ateja Multi Industri 

8. PT. Ateja Tritunggal 

9. PT. Aurora World Cianjur 

10. P.T. Barat Daya Gemilang 

11. PT. CJ Logistics Indonesia 

12. PT. Cahaya Buana Furindotama; 

13. PT Celebes Putra Prima 

14. PT Demak Putra Mandiri 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85242 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Certain Collated Steel Staples from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021– 

2022, 88 FR 51284 (August 3, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Collated Steel 

Staples from the People’s Republic of China: Issues 

and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

the 2021–2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Certain Collated Steel Staples from the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty 

Order, 85 FR 43815 (July 20, 2020) (Order). 

4See Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

further discussion; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Final 

Results Calculation Memorandum for Tianjin 

Hweschun,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

5See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 51284. 

6See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Practice 

Refinement). 

7See Preliminary Results PDM at 5–7. 

8 Id. at 7. 

9See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 

15. PT. Dinamika Indonusa Prima 

16. PT. Dunlopillo Indonesia 

17. PT. Dynasti Indomegah 

18. PT Graha Anom Jaya 

19. PT Graha Seribusatujaya 

20. PT Kline Total Logistics Indonesia 

21. PT. Massindo International 

22. PT. Ocean Centra Furnindo 

23. PT. Quantum Tosan Internasional 

24. PT. Romance Bedding & Furniture 

25. PT. Royal Abadi Sejahtera 

26. PT Rubberfoam Indonesia 

27. PT Solo Murni Epte 

28. PT. Transporindo Buana Kargotama 

29. Sonder Canada Inc 

30. Super Poly Industry PT 

[FR Doc. 2023–26899 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–112] 

Certain Collated Steel Staples From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2021– 

2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Tianjin Hweschun Fasteners 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Tianjin 

Hweschun), the sole mandatory 

respondent in this review, did not sell 

subject merchandise to the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR), 

July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. 

Commerce further determines that 

Zhejiang Best Nail Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(Best Nail)/Shaoxing Bohui Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (Shaoxing Bohui) 

(collectively, Best Nail/Shaoxing 

Bohui), Tianjin Jinyifeng Hardware Co., 

Ltd. (Tianjin Jinyifeng), and Unicorn 

Fasteners Co., Ltd. (Unicorn Fasteners) 

made no shipments of subject 

merchandise from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) during the POR. 

Commerce also determines that China 

Staple (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (China Staple), 

Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd. 

(Shanghai Yueda), and Shijiazhuang 

Shuangming Trade Co., Ltd. 

(Shijiazhuang Shuangming) have not 

established eligibility for a separate rate 

and, therefore, are part of the Chinawide entity. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1766. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 3, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 For 

events subsequent to the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is certain collated steel staples, 

which are primarily classifiable under 

subheading 8305.20.0000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). While the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and for customs purposes, 

the written description of the subject 

merchandise is dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by interested parties 

in briefs are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is provided in 

Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review of the record, 

and comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made one change to the 

margin calculation for Tianjin 

Hweschun.4

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

preliminarily determined that Best Nail/ 

Shaoxing Bohai, Tianjin Jinyifeng, and 

Unicorn Fasteners had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.5 No party filed 

comments with respect to this 

preliminary finding and we received no 

information to contradict it. Therefore, 

we continue to find that these three 

companies had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR and will 

issue appropriate liquidation 

instructions that are consistent with our 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ clarification for 

these final results.6

Separate Rate Eligibility 

In our Preliminary Results, we 

determined that only Tianjin Hweschun 

demonstrated its eligibility for a 

separate rate.7 As we received no 

information or interested party 

arguments to the contrary since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results, we 

continue to find that this company is 

eligible for a separate rate. 

The China-Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

found that China Staple, Shanghai 

Yueda, and Shijiazhuang Shuangming 

did not establish eligibility for a 

separate rate because they did not file 

timely separate rate applications or 

separate rate certifications, as 

appropriate.8 No parties submitted 

comments on this preliminary finding, 

and we continue to determine that each 

of these entities did not establish its 

eligibility for a separate rate. Therefore, 

we determine China Staple, Shanghai 

Yueda, and Shijiazhuang Shuangming 

to be part of the China-wide entity. 

Because no party requested a review of 

the China-wide entity, and Commerce 

no longer considers the China-wide 

entity as an exporter conditionally 

subject to administrative reviews,9 we 

did not conduct a review of the ChinaVerDate Sep<11>2014 20:23 Dec 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1