alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Missouri corporation (herein referred to as
the Company), is required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008; and

WHEREAS, each of the below undersigned is a director of the Company.

NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Thomas R. Voss and/or Warner L. Baxter and/or Steven R. Sullivan and/or Martin J.
Lyons and/or Jerre E. Birdsong the true and lawful attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to affix the name of the undersigned to said Form 10-K and any amendments thereto, and, for the
performance of the same acts, each with power to appoint in their place and stead and as their substitute, one or more attorneys-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of revocation; hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact may do by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 13th day of February
2009:



|                             |  |  |  |                        |  | 
|---------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | 
|                             |  |  |  |                        |  | 
|                             |  |  | 
|Daniel F. Cole, Director     |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel F. Cole     |  | 
|                             |  |  | 
|Adam C. Heflin               |  |  |  | /s/ Adam C. Heflin     |  | 
|                             |  |  | 
|Richard J. Mark, Director    |  |  |  | /s/ Richard J. Mark    |  | 
|                             |  |  | 
|Steven R. Sullivan, Director |  |  |  | /s/ Steven R. Sullivan |  | 
|                             |  |  |  |                        |  | 







|                  |  |   |  |     |  | 
|----------------- |  | - |  | --- |  | 
|STATE OF MISSOURI |  | ) |  |     |  | 
|                  |  | ) |  | SS. |  | 
|CITY OF ST. LOUIS |  | ) |  |     |  | 

On this 13th day of February, 2009, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared the above-named directors of Union Electric Company, known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing power of attorney and acknowledged to me that they executed the same as their free act and deed
for the purposes therein stated.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal.



/s/ Carolyn J. ShannonCAROLYN J. SHANNON Notary Public  Notary Seal STATE OF MISSOURI  ST. LOUIS COUNTY Commission #08383284 My Commission Expires
03/02/2012
-= 

u·s AIRWAYS 

September 7,2010 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Ms. Esta Rosenberg 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application of Mesa Airlines, Inc. for a Statement of 

Authorization to Codeshare with EVA 

(Docket DOT -OST -2010-0216) 

Dear Mr. Gretch and Ms. Rosenberg: 

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding the 

above-referenced Application. We received no objections. 

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited consideration of this 

Application. 

Sincerely, 

~J.JL- Howard Kass 

Vice President - Legal Affairs 

Benjamin T. Slocum 

Director and Assistant General Counsel 

Attachment 

cc: Service List 

1401 H Street NW, Suite 1075 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 326-5154 Fax: (202) 898-4810 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that, on September 7,2010, I caused to be served a copy of the 

foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below: 

byerlyjr@state.gov (Department of State) 

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation) 

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration) 

hkamen@coair.com (Continental) 

dan.weiss@coair.com (Continental) 

rbkeiner@crowell.com (Counsel for Continental) 

carl.nelson@aa.com (American) 

sascha. vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta) 

jeff.morgan@delta.com (Delta) 

jhill@dlalaw.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian) 

robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue) 

msinick@ssd.com (Counsel for Alaska) 

steve.morrisey@united.com (United) 

jeffrey.manley@united.com (United) 

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (Counsel for USA 3000) 

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit) 

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit) 

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas) 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com (Counsel for UPS) 

dfisher@kelleydrye.com (Counsel for UPS) 

anbird@fedex.com (FedEx) 

nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx) 

kevin. montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar) 

efaberman@wileyrein.com (Counsel for AirTran) 

~rJt-- Be Jamln T. Slocum
H. Res. 672 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 13, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 2666) to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from regulating the rates charged for broadband 

Internet access service. The first reading of the bill shall be 

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original 

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule 

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the 

bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
2 

•HRES 672 EH 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are 

waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 

order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 

designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 

debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3 

•HRES 672 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE 3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (132)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,238
<PP&E>                                           1,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (878)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,623
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,413
<SALES>                                          1,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,310
<CGS>                                              891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (182)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
November 30, 2006

27474

#### State v. Birano

Affirmed
Item_5.2_Glossary definition for “Poultry” / page 1

 Item_5.2_Glossary definition for “Poultry” / page 1 

Annex 25

**USA COMMENTS IN RED FONT**

**GLOSSARY**

***BIOSECURITY***

means a set of management, behavioural and physical measures designed to reduce the *risk* of introduction, establishment and spread of pathogenic agents~~animal diseases, *infections* or *infestations*~~to, within and from~~and within~~ a~~n animal~~*population*.

***BIOSECURITY PLAN***

means a ~~plan~~document or series of documents that identify~~ies~~ potential pathways and factors for the introduction, establishment and spread of pathogenic agents~~disease in a *zone* or *compartment*~~, and describe~~s~~ the corresponding *biosecurity*~~measures~~ to be implemented and the mechanisms to evaluate its performance and to update it~~which are being or will be applied to mitigate the disease *risks*, if applicable, in accordance with the recommendations in the *Terrestrial Code*~~.

***BORDER INSPECTION POST***

means any ~~airport, or any port, railway station or road check-point~~international point of entry for *commodities*~~open to *international trade* of *commodities*,**~~and associated facilities, where ~~import~~veterinary inspection~~s can be~~is performed.

***CONTAINER***

means a non-self-propelled receptable or other rigid structure ~~for holding *animals*~~to carry *commodities*during transportation~~a journey by one or several means of transport~~.

***POINT OF EXIT***

means any point from where *commodities* leave the territory of the *exporting country*. 

***QUARANTINE~~STATION~~ CENTRE***

means an *establishment* under the control of the *Veterinary Authority* where *animals* are maintained in isolation for observation during a specified length of time under *biosecurity* to ~~with no direct or indirect~~ensure no contact with other *animals*and *vectors* when relevant, ~~to ensure~~so that there is no transmission of specified pathogenic agents ~~outside~~into nor out of the *establishment*~~while the *animals* are undergoing observation for a specified length of time and, if appropriate, testing or treatment~~.

***SWILL***

means food scraps or food waste, that contain or have been in contact with *animal products*, which may be used as *feed* when treated.

**RATIONALE:**To correspond with Annex 26, Article 4.X.8.1)i) and to clarify when swill may be used as feed.

***VEHICLE/VESSEL***

means any means of conveyance including train, truck, aircraft or ship that is used for carrying~~animals~~*commodities*.

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023	1

Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission / February 2023	1

Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission / February 2023	1
February 16, 2010

Dorothy Beard Chief, Docket Branch Department of Transportation 1200 New JerseyAve., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Applicants' Confidential Responses to Interrogatories, American/JapanAirlines Antitrust Immunity, DOT-OST-2010-0034

DearMs. Beard:

AmericanAirlines, Inc. and JapanAirlines International Co., Ltd. hereby submit the confidential version of the February 16, 2010 Responses to Interrogatories. We request confidential treatment of this document in accordance with our Rule 12 motion of February 12, 2010, whichwe incorporate herein by reference.
Respectfully submitted,

WILLIAM KARAS CAROL GOSAIN Steptoe &Johnson LLP 1330 ConnecticutAve., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-6223 wkaras@steptoe.com cgosain@steptoe.com

Counsel for JapanAirlines

cc: Todd Homan Peter Irvine Keith Glatz Service list CARL B. NELSON,'JR. Associate General Counsel AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5647 carl.nelson@aa.comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifythat I have this day servedthe foregoing document by email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com scott.mcclain@delta.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com bkeiner@crowell.com mrosia@crowell.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com jeffrey.manley@united.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com robert.land@jetblue.com msinick@ssd.com cdonley@ssd.com anbird@fedex.com dvaughan@kelleydrye.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com lhalloway@crowell.com efaberman@wileyrein.com mroller@rollerbauer.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com

February 16, 2010 jhill@dlalaw.com bill@mietuslaw.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com mcmillin@woa.com mchopra@jamhoff.com russell.bailey@alpa.org dkirstein@yklaw.com jyoung@yklaw.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil jim.ballough@faa.gov byerlyjr@state.gov recohn@hhlaw.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com lachter@starpower.net anita.mosner@hklaw.com rpommer@atlasair.com gmurphy@crowell.com
Document Number: Revision: 

Previous Number:

Section/Area:

 Date:

Notes:

Inspection: Specialist Routing of Inspection Reports

CVB-WI-0136 04

ICWI0215.09

CVB-WI-IC

05 Aug 2022

CVB-Released
June 12, 2002

23382

#### State v. Williams

Affirmed
#### State v. Traxler

23035

02/08/2001

Affirmed
# C_2019082EN.01005501.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — CH v Parliament

(Case T-83/18) (1)

((Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament and its prevention at the workplace - Decision rejecting the request for assistance - Right to be heard - Principle of audi alteram partem - Refusal to disclose the opinion of the Advisory Committee and the minutes of the hearing of witnesses - Refusal of the defendant institution to comply with a measure of inquiry of the General Court))

(2019/C 82/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CH (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 20 March 2017 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance made by the applicant on 22 December 2011 and, second, compensation for the loss she has allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 20 March 2017, by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance made by CH on 22 December 2011; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 20 March 2017, by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance made by CH on 22 December 2011;

| 2. | Orders the Parliament to pay CH, in respect of non-material harm suffered, an amount of EUR 8 500; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Parliament to pay CH, in respect of non-material harm suffered, an amount of EUR 8 500;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
# C_2019230EN.01004501.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Battelle Memorial Institute v EUIPO (HEATCOAT)

(Case T-469/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark HEATCOAT - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration)

(2019/C 230/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Battelle Memorial Institute (Columbus, Ohio, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 May 2018 (Case R 36/2018-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign HEATCOAT as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Battelle Memorial Institute to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Battelle Memorial Institute to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.

---
#### Casumpang v. ILWU, Local 142

22726

12/20/2000

Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from InfoNow's
quarterly report to stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 1999,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2289
<PP&E>                                            2328
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                        1561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3307
<SALES>                                           3977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3977
<CGS>                                             1933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (13)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     54
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 54
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        54
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01




</TABLE>
May 25, 2000

21409

#### Fujiwara v. Vierra

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John E. Bailye, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Dendrite International, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 7, 2004

 

 
| /s/ John E. Bailye                                 |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| John E. Bailye                                     |
| Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----