alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
14CFR Part 39 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration



# IZ5L

# I rDocket No. FAA-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-040-ADI 14910-13-PI
~l,;("'l<llE.~ns ~"I~SI •• aoL

OL~I",,~\

•• llOL RIN 2120-A.'\64 Airworthiness Directives; BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 and A VTO 146-R.I70A, I46-RJ85A, and 146-RJ IOOAAirplanes AGE.NCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe product listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl) originated byan aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafi condition as; \lT1."" SH'IlOL
SII'l~I.s.SOG 

### ) _II 1>11"'. 1- -I During the removal ofthe wing removable leading edge on a SAc 146 aircraft forarepair (not related to the subject addressed by this AD), corrosion was found on the wing fixed leading edge structure. The investigation determined that the existing scheduled environmental and fatigue inspections would not have detected the corrosion or fatigue damage. , Ii 

# '/' ~ 

# .

Corrosion or fatigue damage inthis area, ifnot detected and corrected, could leadto degradation ofthe structural integrity ofthe wing.


## * * * 

### * * 

## * * The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditi "n described in the MeAL
# C_2019246EN.01002202.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/22

---

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Czarnecki v Parliament

(Case T-230/18) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Statements made against another Member of Parliament - Early termination of the term of office and duties of the Vice-President of the Parliament - Rights of the defence - Misuse of powers - Equal treatment)

(2019/C 246/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ryszard Czarnecki (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, S. Seyr and S. Alonso de León, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 7 February 2018 prematurely bringing to an end the applicant’s term of office as Vice-President of the Parliament.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ryszard Czarnecki is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ryszard Czarnecki is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

---
1

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.

Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2775

___________

Keith Fisher, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

R. L. Morrison, Warden, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 6, 2007

 Filed: December 20, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Keith Fisher appeals the district court’s1

 partial denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Following de novo review, see Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d

1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003), we agree with the district court that the Bureau of Prisons

had no obligation to consider Fisher for immediate placement in a Residential Reentry

Center (RRC), see Fults v. Sanders, 442 F.3d 1088, 1089-90 (8th Cir. 2006), and we

decline to consider Fisher’s newly raised claim that he is entitled to immediate RRC
-2-

placement based on extraordinary family circumstances, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d

912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we affirm under 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

______________________________
#### State v. Titsworth

20884

1/28/99

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part & Remanded
##### 



Exhibit 31.14
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
TAG-BCW Petition Flow Chart Petitioner May contact U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for advice and input Prepares petition for Test Plant List or Field Release Sends to APHIS-PPQ (TAG-BCW Executive Secretary) TAG-BCW Executive Secretary Acknowledge receipt of petition to petitioner Establishes timelines Sends petition review sheets to TAG members Generates hard copy folders of petition to file Sends reminders to TAG members Responds to TAG or Petitioner questions Filters information through the TAG system TAG-BCW Members Review and evaluate the petition Including the Endangered Species Act Synthesize comments from subject matter specialists Submit comments and recommendations to TAG-BCW Exe. Sec. Subject matter specialists evaluate TAG-BCW Executive Secretary Confirms receipt of reviewer sheets Sends compiled reviews to TAG Chair Sets up conference calls to discuss issues w/ petition Logs the petition , files information in red folder TAG-BCW Chair Consolidates recommendations Submits TAG recommendations to TAG Executive Secretary, and Petitioner

Petitioner Conducts more research, or Resubmits petition or test plant list, or Discontinues effort No USDA-APHIS evaluates the recommendations for acceptance

Update 7/19/2012 Yes

Legend TAG Member Organizations APHIS = Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ARS = Agricultural Research Service PPD = Program Policy Development PPQ = Plant Protection and Quarantine TAG-BCW = Technical Advisory Group for the Biological Control of Weeds

The Petitioner submits an application for a permit through the ePermit system (the permit application process is on page 3-2-4 of the TAG Manual)

TAG-BCW Executive Secretary Submits recommendation letter to APHIS PPQ Files petition and recommendation letter with APHIS USDA-APHIS USDA-APHIS acknowledges receipt of the recommendation
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 690 

Recognizing and celebrating April as ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner 

Advocacy Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2016 

Mr. HONDA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating April as ‘‘National Bilingual/ 

Multilingual Learner Advocacy Month’’. 

Whereas the National Association for Bilingual Education 

has made invaluable contributions to the efforts nationally to advance educational equity and excellence for bilingual/multilingual students, and as part of this effort 

has initiated the recognition of April 2016 as the first 

National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy Month; 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ recognizes that bilingual/multilingual learners 

are one of the fastest growing student populations in 

U.S. schools, that this group of students brings multiple 

assets to schools and adds to the rich diversity among 

students; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 690 IH 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ is an opportunity to draw attention to the persistent gap between bilingual/multilingual learners and 

native English-speaking students; 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ calls on stakeholders at all levels to examine the 

diverse needs of bilingual/multilingual learners and to 

build an inclusive and respectful culture; 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ highlights a commitment to ensure educational 

equity and access leading these learners to thrive academically and become productive biliterate/multiliterate 

global citizens; 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ encourages institutions to adopt policies and 

practices such as dual language instructional programs 

that value and use students’ languages and cultural assets to learn high academic content, promote long-term 

academic achievement, and increase graduation rates; 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ calls for the need to prepare highly qualified bilingual teachers in all disciplines to address the unique 

needs of bilingual/multilingual learners in diverse settings; 

Whereas ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual Learner Advocacy 

Month’’ calls for the need to engage parents and guardians of bilingual/multilingual learners in their student’s 

educational journey; and 

Whereas the National Association for Bilingual Education 

recognizes the significant languages and cultural assets 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 690 IH 

that bilingual/multilingual learners bring to schools: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and celebrates ‘‘National Bilingual/Multilingual 

3 Learner Advocacy Month’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019035EN.01001501.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/15

---

Appeal brought on 27 November 2018 by Duferco Long Products SA against the judgment delivered on 18 September 2018 in Case T-93/17 Duferco Long Products v Commission

(Case C-738/18 PP)

(2019/C 35/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Duferco Long Products SA (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff, M. Favart, Q. Declève, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court of Justice of the European Union should:

| 1. | Set aside the judgment under appeal (T-93/17, EU:T:2018:558); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Set aside the judgment under appeal (T-93/17, EU:T:2018:558);

| 2. | Annul Article 1(f), and Article 2 of the Commission Decision of 20 January 2016 on State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) implemented by Belgium in favour of Duferco; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annul Article 1(f), and Article 2 of the Commission Decision of 20 January 2016 on State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) implemented by Belgium in favour of Duferco;

| 3. | Order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings and the costs of the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings and the costs of the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its appeal, the appellant submits that the General Court erred in law by refusing to examine two errors of calculation made by the Commission in the context of the assessment of the pari passu nature of the sixth measure referred to in the Commission Decision of 20 January 2016 on State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) and in the application of the private investor in a market economy test.

In particular, the applicant submits that:

| — | The General Court did not carry out an adequate judicial review of the manner in which the Commission applied the private investor in a market economy test |
| --- | --- |

—

The General Court did not carry out an adequate judicial review of the manner in which the Commission applied the private investor in a market economy test

| — | The General Court should have examined, as a matter of priority, the plea alleging errors made by the Commission in assessing the pari passu nature of that sixth measure rather than favouring analysis of the documents provided by Belgium. |
| --- | --- |

—

The General Court should have examined, as a matter of priority, the plea alleging errors made by the Commission in assessing the pari passu nature of that sixth measure rather than favouring analysis of the documents provided by Belgium.

---
# C_2019399EN.01006001.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/60

---

Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — BS v Parliament

(Case T-593/18) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Notice of modification of pension entitlements - Dependent child allowance - Education allowance - Child suffering from an infirmity preventing him from earning a livelihood - Actual maintenance of the child - Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Recovery of overpayments - Right to good administration - Action for annulment)

(2019/C 399/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BS (represented by: M. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: D. Boytha and T. Lazian, and subsequently by T. Lazian and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the notice of modification of the Applicant’s pension entitlements of 10 August 2017 issued by the Parliament and, secondly, ‘so far as necessary’ of the decision to recover the purported overpayment of EUR 1 589,16 in respect of the months of September, October and November 2017 and of EUR 4 815,16, as shown on the pension slip for December 2017.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | BS shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

BS shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.

---
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

AC-19-004-A • Issued January 2020

Daily Observations: Behavior

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about daily observation of animals. 

An additional aid with information about physical observations is also available.

Playing, exploring, 

foraging

 Lethargic, sick, 

stressed, fearful, 

withdrawn, aggressive

Resting, content Social with others 

in the group

Stereotypic or repetitive 

behaviors, pacing, 

panting excessively, 

huddling or shivering

Isolated from

 the group

Eating and drinking 

normally

Not eating, vomiting, 

regurgitating

Observing all of your animals daily is a vital part of caring for them—

and the best way to identify illness or injury early. Early detection 

and treatment improves health and well-being. 

Both physical and behavioral observations are important to get a complete picture 

of an animal’s well-being. Here are behaviors you can look for:

If you see any unusual or abnormal behavior, it may be time to consult with your veterinarian

for proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. 

NORMAL BEHAVIOR

Some animals are naturally more active or outgoing while others 

may tend to be more calm or quiet. Knowing what is normal for your 

animals will help you pick up on abnormal behaviors earlier.

ABNORMAL BEHAVIOR

Exhibiting behavior that is unusual for that individual
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 191 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 191

Expressing support for the designation of April 10, 2015, as ``Venture 
                         Smith's Freedom Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2015

  Ms. DeLauro (for herself and Mr. Courtney) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of April 10, 2015, as ``Venture 
                         Smith's Freedom Day''.

Whereas 250 years ago, in the year 1765, Venture Smith, at the age of 36, 
        purchased his freedom;
Whereas Venture Smith went on to free his family from the bondage of slavery;
Whereas Venture Smith went on to become a successful businessman in the State of 
        Connecticut; and
Whereas, April 10, 2015, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Venture 
        Smith's Freedom Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``Venture Smith's Freedom Day'', which would recognize 
the 250th anniversary of Venture Smith purchasing his freedom and going 
on to become a successful businessman in Connecticut.
                                 <all>
```
#### Tanaka v. Tanaka

16142

9/28/94

Affirmed
Other

1884.672
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Detections of Highly Pathogenic

Avian Influenza

Last Modified: 

Print

The United States has the strongest avian influenza surveillance program in the

world. Through our ongoing wild bird surveillance program, APHIS collects and tests

large numbers of samples from wild birds in the North American flyways.

It is not uncommon to detect avian influenza in wild birds, as avian influenza viruses

circulate freely in those populations without the birds appearing sick. In addition to

monitoring for avian influenza in wild bird populations, APHIS monitors for the virus

in commercial and backyard birds.

With the recent detections of the Eurasian H5 strain of highly pathogenic avian

influenza (HPAI) in wild birds and domestic poultry in the United States, bird owners

should review their biosecurity practices and stay vigilant to protect poultry and pet

birds from this disease. APHIS is working closely with State partners on surveillance,

reporting, and control efforts.

Confirmations in Commercial and Backyard Flocks 
Detections in Wild Birds 

Detections in Mammals 

Detections in Livestock 
More Information

USDA Confirms HPAI in a Commercial Turkey Flock in Dubois County, Indiana

(webinar, 2/09/2022)

Update on HPAI Detection in Wild Birds (webinar, 1/18/2022)

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Information

Defend the Flock Resource Center
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 677 

Congratulating the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice Hockey Team on 

winning the 2016 National Collegiate Athletic Association Women’s Ice 

Hockey Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2016 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. WALZ, Mr. 

PAULSEN, Mr. KLINE, Mr. EMMER of Minnesota, and Mr. PETERSON) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice 

Hockey Team on winning the 2016 National Collegiate 

Athletic Association Women’s Ice Hockey Championship. 

Whereas, on Sunday, March 20, 2016, the University of Minnesota Gophers won the 2016 National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘NCAA’’) Women’s Ice Hockey Championship against 

previously undefeated Boston College by a score of 3 to 

1; 

Whereas, on Friday, March 18, 2016, Sarah Potomak scored 

the game-winning goal in overtime to give the University 

of Minnesota a 3–2 win over rival University of Wisconsin in a Frozen Four semifinal game and advance to 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 677 IH 

the national championship game for the fifth consecutive 

year; 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice Hockey 

Team won an impressive 35 games during the 2015– 

2016 season; 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice Hockey 

Team has won 4 of the last 5 national championships; 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice Hockey 

Team has won 7 national championships overall, including back-to-back championships in 2004 and 2005, 2012 

and 2013, and 2015 and 2016; 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice Hockey 

Team has the most NCAA Women’s Ice Hockey Championships and NCAA Women’s Ice Hockey Tournament 

wins; and 

Whereas the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice Hockey 

program— 

(1) benefits from 7 years of steady leadership from 

Head Coach Brad Frost; 

(2) features 3 All-Americans, as named by the 

American Hockey Coaches Association, on the 2015– 

2016 team; 

(3) has a remarkable roster of players, including 

Amanda Kessel, Sarah Potomak, Amanda Leveille, and 

Lee Stecklein, all of whom were named to the 2016 Frozen Four All-Tournament Team; and 

(4) has a multitude of players, past and present, 

who have represented the United States in Olympic competition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes— 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 677 IH 

1 (1) the University of Minnesota Women’s Ice 

2 Hockey Team on winning the 2016 National Colle3 giate Athletic Association Women’s Ice Hockey 

4 Championship; and 

5 (2) the achievements of the players, coaches, 

6 staff, and fans who contributed to the championship 

7 season. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Government Regulatory

Impact Model

8/29/2006 

INCOME AFTER TAX

05

1015202530354045

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

$ millions