alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 12

- 09

- 00 344

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TRACI ANNETTE CHRISTENSEN , ' APPEAL FROM THE 3 5 4TH APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

RAINS COUNTY

, APPELLEE ' RAINS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPI

NION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant, Traci Annette Christensen, has failed, after notice, to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial court clerk = s fee for preparing the clerk = s record. Christensen appeals from a judgment si g ned on September 11, 2009. On November 13, 2009, this court notified the trial court clerk that
the clerk’s record was due to have been filed on or before November 10, 2009. The court also extended the time for filing the clerk = s record to December 10, 2 009. On November 18, 2009, the trial court clerk responded in writing that the clerk = s record had not been filed because Christensen had not paid the fee for preparation of the record. On November 23, 2009, this court informed Christensen that the clerk = s letter stated the reason for the delay in filing was due to nonpayment of the required preparation fee. Christensen was further informed that, pursuant to rules of appellate procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of f ull payment to the clerk was provided on or before December 3, 2009. Because Christensen has not provided proof of full payment or otherwise responded to this court = s notice, the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Opinion delivere d December 16 , 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(PUBLISH)
#### Leis v. Chatburn

22194

01/31/2000

Vacated and Remanded
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 76 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 76

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 
            Commerce in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2015

Mr. Upton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 
            Commerce in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and Commerce (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $19,531,442 for the One Hundred 
Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $9,765,721 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $9,765,721 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019288EN.01004901.xml

| 26.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2019 — Gibson Brands v EUIPO — Wilfer (Shape of a guitar body)

(Case T-340/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU three-dimensional mark - Shape of a guitar body - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2019/C 288/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gibson Brands, Inc. (Nashville, Tennessee, United States) (represented by: initially K. Hughes, Solicitor, and A. Renck and C. Stöber, lawyers, and subsequently A. Renck and C. Stöber)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and H. O’Neill, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hans-Peter Wilfer (Markeneukirchen, Germany) (represented by O. Nilgen and A. Kockläuner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 March 2018 (Case R 415/2017-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mr Wilfer and Gibson Brands.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gibson Brands, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gibson Brands, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

---
#### Michael V. PITEO, Natural Tutor of Michael J. Piteo, for and on Behalf of the Minor Son, Michael J. Piteo, Appellants, v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS’ INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 20680.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1963.

William V. Dunne, Jacob H. Sciambra, New Orleans, La., for appellants.

Felicien P. Lozes, Drury, Lozes & Dodge, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The district court, in a diversity case brought under the Louisiana Direction Action Statute, La.Rev.Stat.Ann. 22:655, determined that the plaintiff, appellant here, had failed to show any liability of the defendant’s insured and directed a *955verdict for the defendant. Being convinced that the court’s action was free from error, the judgment which was entered on the directed verdict is

Affirmed.
#### Doe, (DOB 3/12/91), In re

18252

11/22/96

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 607 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 607

            Condemning and censuring President Barack Obama.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2016

Mr. Ross submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Condemning and censuring President Barack Obama.

Whereas President Barack Obama continues to operate outside of the rule of law 
        and the authority granted to him by the Constitution of the United 
        States;
Whereas President Barack Obama is circumventing the intent of Congress and the 
        bipartisan Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel 
        Prevention Act of 2015 that was explicitly designed to protect our 
        country and citizens from radical Islamic terrorism, and which he signed 
        into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016; and
Whereas the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 passed in the House of 
        Representatives with a bipartisan vote of 316-113: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives does hereby condemn and 
censure President Barack Obama.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021148EN.01001401.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 February 2021 — Universität Koblenz-Landau v EACEA

(Case T-108/18) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Tempus IV Programmes - Grant agreements - Contractual nature of the dispute - Reclassification of the action - Eligible costs - Systemic and recurrent irregularities - Full repayment of amounts paid - Proportionality - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

(2021/C 148/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Universität Koblenz-Landau (Mainz, Germany) (represented by: C. von der Lühe and I. Felder, lawyers)

Defendant: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet, acting as Agent, and by R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Re:

Application principally under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letters of 21 December 2017 and 7 February 2018 of the EACEA relating to the amounts paid to the applicant in the context of grant agreements concluded for the implementation of three projects in the field of higher education and, alternatively, under Article 272 TFEU for a declaration that the right to recovery claimed is not established.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Universität Koblenz-Landau to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Universität Koblenz-Landau to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of C&M Management Inc. and Director of Accounting of Boston Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                  | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|Date:             |                                        
|November 20, 2003 | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 12753 Employed part time (persons who usually work Number in thousands 25 to 54 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU02600060Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Employed, Usually Work Part Time - 25-

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:36 PM)
#### Board of County Commissioners of Montgomery County, Appellee, *v.*Unknown Heirs, Devisees and Legal Representatives of Cooper et al., Appellants.

(No. 31784

Decided June 22, 1949.)

*Mr. Mathias H. Heck,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Albert J. Dwyer,*for appellee.

*Mr. Eugene G. Kemiedy, Mr. Miles 8. Kuhns, Mr. Heber 8. Leonard, Mr. Otterbein Creager, Mr. Howard P. Williamson, Mr. Roy G. Fitzgerald*and *Mr. William M. Pettit,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taft, JJ., concur.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply543Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Brenda Conway,... (not verified)PermalinkOctober 15, 2018 - 7:35amEnjoyable read while riding the commuter bus into work._x000D_ _x000D_ Thank you!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# RECEiVED APR- 62017 

## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## HEARING DOCKET OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D. C.

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKETNO. FAA-2016-4268 PETERHANTZ COMPANY FAA CASE NO. 2012S0700041 Respondent Judge Douglas M. Rawald

COMPLAINANT'S PRE-HEARING SUBMISSION Pursuantto the September 1, 2016 OrderFinalizing Litigation Schedule, Complainant hereby submits its witness evidence list.
I. Witness List 1. Beverly A. Farris FAA Special Agent FAA Louisville FSD0-17 I0200 Forest GreenBlvd. Suite 312 Louisville, KY 40223 (502) 498-1647 Ms. Farris will testify about the investigation and factors affecting sanction 2. Cartice Dye Manager, FAA AtlantaHazardous Materials Branch FAA Southern Regional Office 1701 ColumbiaAve. College Park, GA 30337 (404) 305-6871 Ifneeded, Ms. Dye willtestify about the factors affecting sanction 3. Robert Cogen UPS Dangerous Goods Manager 12380 Morris Rd 1Alpharetta, GA 30005 (502) 359-2951 Mr. Cogen will testify about UPS's discovery ofthe shipment involved in this matter II. Exhibits Complainant may proffer the following documents, either in his case-in-chiefor for the purposes ofimpeachment or rebuttal: 1. Respondent's Responses to Complainant's First Discovery Requests. 2. December 2, 2011 Letter and enclosures from Lucy Cobos, Respondent's General Manager. 3. Photographs ofthe package involved in this matter. 4. FAAForm 5800.1 for the shipment involved 

### inthis matter. 5. FAA Order 2150.3B, Appendix C. Respectfully submitted this 5thday ofApril, 2017.



# a'fh.~~

**~ander;**

Attorney Office ofthe ChiefCounsel

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Complainant's Pre-Hearing Submissions was sent via Federal Express to: Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Timothy I. McCulloch, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 750 Phoenix, AZ 85016



# tL/fr,.

**~----** Ryan M. Landefs Attorney Office ofthe ChiefCounsel
Date (original and one copy)

(one copy and CD with exhibits)

(one copy)



### 3
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
 MAF Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference
in the registration statements (No.s 33-79110, 333-83534, 333-61792, 333-72863,
333-72865, 333-110986, 333-110990 and 333-132231) on Form S-8 of MAF Bancorp, Inc. of our
reports dated March 1, 2007, relating to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of MAF Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the 2006 Form 10-K of MAF
Bancorp, Inc., dated March 1, 2007.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 2007
DA 15-0039

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

2013 MT 316

IN THE MATTER OF:

Z. F.,

 Respondent and Appellant.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District,

In and For the County of Cascade, Cause No. DI 15-0022

Honorable Dirk M. Sandefur, Presiding Judge

COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For Appellant:

Michael J. Moore; Missoula, MT

For Appellee:

Tim Fox; Helena ,MT; Eileen Joyce; Butte, MT Jordan Rhodes Kilby; 

Missoula, MT

Submitted on Briefs: [SubmissionDate]

 Decided: 

Filed:

__________________________________________

Clerk

12/16/2016

Case Number: DA 15-0582
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing FinancialStatements Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

            I, Frank J. Fradella, Chief Executive Officer of Home Solutions ofAmerica, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, herebycertify that (i) the Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in thatreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presentedtherein. 

 

| Date: April 29, 2004 | /s/FRANK J. FRADELLA                  FrankJ. FradellaChiefExecutive Officer   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Miller v. Manuel

14837

12/13/91

Denied
Exabyte Repayment Plan

Memorandum of Understanding





This Memorandum records mutual agreements reached as of this 14th day of February, 2003, between Exabyte Corporation, having a place of business at 1685 38th Street, Boulder, Colorado 80301 U.S.A, ("Exabyte") and TDK Corporation having a place of business at 1-13-1, Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8272 Japan ("TDK").

This Memorandum shall document agreements between Exabyte and TDK regarding special payment terms for the total amount of accounts payable owed by Exabyte to TDK as of December 31, 2002 ("12/31/02 Total Amount Payable"). Exabyte will repay the 12/31/02 Total Amount Payable in full and in such amounts and on such dates as defined in the attached payment schedule ("Repayment Schedule"). Exabyte will pay for new purchases made from TDK after 12/31/2002 according to the payment terms ("Payment Terms") defined in the attachment.

Except in the case of any failure by Exabyte or other event as defined below and to the extent that Exabyte is in compliance with the Payment Terms regarding any shipments received from TDK after 12/31/2002, TDK agrees to make a reasonable effort to comply with details of any and all purchase orders from Exabyte, and to continue shipments to Exabyte.

Upon the occurrences of any one or more of the following events, this Memorandum of Understanding shall be terminated and the entire unpaid balance of (i) the 12/31/02 Total Amount Payable and (ii) all invoices with respect to new shipments after 12/31/2002 shall become immediately due and payable, provided however that direct equity investment by individual, institutional investors and/or strategic or corporate investors shall be excluded from any of the following events to the extent such investments are limited so that they do not effectively constitute a merger or consolidation:

i.       any failure by Exabyte to make a payment according to the Repayment Schedule when such payment is due;

ii.      any failure by Exabyte to comply with the Payment Terms with respect to payables owed to TDK by Exabyte for purchases made 
                and shipments received after December 31, 2002;

iii.    a merger, consolidation, or other corporate reorganization; termination of existence; insolvency; business failure, filing for any form 
               of bankruptcy relief; a bankruptcy petition filed against it or cessation of the conduct of any substantial part of Exabyte's current 
               normal business activity.

This Memorandum shall, when signed by TDK and Exabyte representatives, shall supercede and replace any formal or informal agreements, memorandums or proposals whether oral or written made by the parties in December, 2002 or January or February, 2003 with regard to the repayment of the 12/31/02 Total Amount Payable.







|By:________________________ | By:________________________
|--------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Date:______________________ | Date:______________________
|Exabyte Corporation         | TDK Corporation