alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018427EN.01000701.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu (Poland) lodged on 24 July 2018 — Profi Credit Polska S.A., whose seat is in Bielsko-Biała, v OH

(Case C-483/18)

(2018/C 427/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Profi Credit Polska S.A., whose seat is in Bielsko-Biała

Respondent: OH

Question referred

Should Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (1) in particular Article 3(1) and (2), Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof, and Directive 2008/48/EC of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, (2) in particular Article 22(3) thereof, be interpreted as precluding an interpretation of Article 10, in conjunction with Article 17, of the ustawa z dnia 28 kwietnia 1936 r. prawo wekslowe (Law of 28 April 1936 on Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes) according to which a court is not permitted to act of its own motion in a situation where it has a strong and justified belief, based on materials not originating from the parties to the case, that the contract giving rise to the basic legal relationship is at least partially invalid, and the applicant pursues his claim under a blank promissory note while the defendant raises no pleas and behaves passively?

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

(2)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

---
RONMENTAL PROTECTION prutecting the future for generations February 11,2010 Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator OAR- 1,USEPA Region 

### IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: On behalf of Governor Gibbons, as his appointed designee, this letter transmits to you two hard copies of Clark County's revisionsto their minor source permitting program regulations and five compact discs. Additionally, the regulations may be viewed on Clark County's website at 

### httv://www.accessclarkcountv.com/depts/daqeaq/les/paes/work index.aspx.The Nevada Division ofEnvironmental Protection (NDEP) requests approval of the enclosed Clark County regulations into the Nevada State Implementation Plan. The enclosed package contains four new or revised Clark County Air Quality Regulations: Sections 0, 12.0, 12.1and 12.11. The primary focus ofthese regulations is on permitting

"a,... requirements for minor stationary sources; however, the changes and updates to the definitions in section 0, and to the general requirements and transition procedures in section 12.0, apply to other types ofpermitting actions that will be the subject of future rule revisions. The regulations were adopted by the Clark County Board of County Commissioners on November 3,2009. Evidence of adoption, appropriate public notice and the participation process is included as Appendix A. Public comments and Clark County's response are found in Appendix 

### B. If you should have any questions about this submittal or require additional clarification, you may contact Russell Roberts ofthe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management at (702) 45 5

### - 1 6 1

### 1.

Administrator Enclosures
cc W/O enclosures: Robin Reedy, Chief of Staff, Office of the Governor Allen Biaggi, Director, DCNR Greg Remer, Chief, Bureau ofAir Quality Planning, NDEP Tina Gingras, Assistant Director, Clark County DAQEM

.,-- Russell Roberts, Rules Project, Clark County DAQEM Jefferson Wehling, Air Attorneys (ORC-2), EPA Region IX Gerardo Rios, Permits Office (AIR-3), Air Division, EPA Region IX Certified Mail No. 7008 1 140 0004 4029 4309 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 400 1 Carson City, Nevada 89701 

# . p: 775.687.4670

# . f: 775.687.5856

# . www.ndep.nv.gov prmredan recycled paper
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 8, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 135 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-102, CP2024-106.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-27413 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 8, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-24-00275-CV BRADY BRINKMAN, Appellant V. INFINITY HOMES INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-07052-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III On April 29, 2024, we sent a letter to the parties questioning our jurisdiction
over this appeal because it appears the appeal is moot. We directed appellant to file
a letter brief addressing our jurisdictional concern no later than May 9, 2024. We
expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so might resu lt in the dismissal of the
appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not file d a letter brief nor
further corresponded with the Court rega rding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

240275F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III / BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

BRADY BRINKMAN, Appellant

No. 05-24-00275-CV V.
INFINITY HOMES INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-07052- B. Opinion delivered by JusticePedersen, III. Justices PartidaKipness and Carlyle participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered July 8, 2024
### National Advisory Council for

Environmental Policy & Technology

Final Agenda

May 19

- 20 , 2011

Hilton Garden Inn

815 14th Street NW

Washington, DC 20005

Tel: 1

- 202

- 783

- 7800



### Thursday, May 19 , 2011

8:0 0 am Registration

8:30 am Welcome and Introductions

Mark Joyce

NACEPT Acting Designated Federal Officer

EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

Dr. James H. Johnson , Jr.

NACEPT Chair

Cynthia Jones

- Jackson

Acting Director

EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Ou treach



### 8:40 am O pening Remarks

Bob Perciasepe

EPA Deputy Administrator



### 9:00 am Overview of NACEPT’s Second Advice Letter on EPA Workforce Planning:

Strategies to Obtain and Retain Scientific and Technical Expertise and Leadership

Capabilities and Cultu re for “One EPA”

Howard Learner and Sara Kendall

NACEPT Workforce Workgroup Co

- Chair s

Paul T. Anastas

Science Advisor and Assistant Administrator

EPA Office of Research and Development2 Nanci E. Gelb

Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator

EPA Office o f Administration and Resources Management

Raul Soto Jr.

Associate Assistant Administrator

Outreach, Diversity and Collaboration

EPA Office of Administration and Resources Management

James W. Newsom

Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management

EPA Region 3



### 10:00 am Break

10:15 am Discussion of NACEPT’s Third Workforce Advice Letter on Achieving Greater

Diversity in EPA

Overview and Initial Thoughts on NACEPT Diversity Charge

o Dr. James H. Johnson , Jr.

NACEPT Chair

o Roger Rivera and Effenus Henderson

NACEPT Workforce Workgroup Diversity Co

- Leads

Overview of EPA Diversity Programs and Activities and Additional Guidance for

NACEPT Workgroup

o Raul Soto Jr.

Associate Assistant Administrator

Outreach, Diversity and Collaborat ion

EPA Office of Administration and Resources Management

o Rafael DeLeon

Director

EPA Office of Civil Rights

o James W. Newsom

Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management

EPA Region 3



### 11:15 am Overview of FY 2011

- 2015 EPA St rategic Plan

Barbara J. Bennett

EPA Chief Financial Officer



### 12:00 p m Public Comments

12 : 15 p m Lunch (on your own)3



### 1:15 pm Council Discussion of Second Advice L etter on EPA Workforce Planning

2:45 pm Break

3:00 pm Review Workgroup Charges and Delive rables

Dr. James H. Johnson , Jr.

NACEPT Chair



### 3:15 pm Workforce Issues and Vulnerable Populations Workgroups meet in separate,

concurrent sessions.

6:00 pm ADJOURN

Friday, May 20 , 2011

8:30 am Council Approval of Second Advice Letter on EPA Workforc e Planning

9:30 am Workforce Issues and Vulnerable Populations Workgroups meet in separate,

concurrent sessions.

11:15 am Break

11:30 am Workgroup Report

- Outs

12:30 pm Public Comments

1:00 pm Chair’s Su mmary, Action Items, and Future Meeting Dates

2:00 pm ADJOURN
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedDecember 14, 2007, with respect to the 2007 consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K forthe year ended September 30, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-84402 and 333-42245) and on Forms S-8(File Nos. 333-95282,, 333-3438, 333-26135, 333-44281, 333-50679, 333-76991, 333-33944, 333-56800, 333-84404, 333-101378, 333-115494, and 333-144006). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

San Jose,California 

December 14, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Clyde E. HEDGER, Appellant.

No. 04-3997.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 30, 2005.

Decided: Oct. 12, 2005.

Michael J. Hunt, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Appellee.

Anita Lee Burns, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Clyde E. Hedger, U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, MO, pro se.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

*565PER CURIAM.

Clyde Hedger appeals following the district court’s1 revocation of his supervised release and imposition of a sentence of 10 months in prison and 4 months supervised release. On appeal, Hedger argues that (1) the district court erred in revoking his supervised release based on its determination that Hedger assaulted a nursing center employee; and (2) he should have been sentenced only to his time served of 2 months. We reject these arguments and affirm.

The testimony of the government’s witnesses, which the district court was entitled to credit, amply supports the finding that Hedger violated his supervised release by assaulting a nursing home employee. *See United States v. Carothers,*337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir.2003) (credibility determinations by district court during supervised release revocation hearing are virtually unreviewable on appeal). Further, both the prison term and the supervised release term were within authorized limits, and the district court considered appropriate factors in imposing the revocation sentence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (permitting imposition of revocation sentence after consideration of factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); authorizing up to 2 years imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release where original offense was Class C felony), (h) (authorizing new period of supervised release not to exceed maximum term of supervised release for original offense, less any prison time imposed upon revocation of supervised release). Thus, we conclude that Hedger’s sentence is not unreasonable. *See United States v. Tyson,*413 F.3d 824, 825-26 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm, and we also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
#### J. B. PRITCHARD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20105.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1963.

See also 5 Cir., 310 F.2d 57.

William H. Moore, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., Harvey J. Kennedy, Harvey J. Kennedy, Jr., Barnesville, Ga., for appellant.

Allen L. Chancey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., J. Robert Sparks, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Arnold S. Yorra, Atty., Internal Revenue Service, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges. and

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence presents only the question whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a motion for new trial.

It appearing that the new evidence presented relates only to a collateral matter, we conclude that it was not an abuse of the discretion of the trial court to deny the motion.

The judgment is affirmed.
Government RegulatoryImpact Model8/29/2006CAC_GRIM_v3.xlsINCOME AFTER TAX0510152025303540452000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2031

$ millionsBaseStandard1:=I
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 323 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 323

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
 Government of Mexico should forthwith repatriate the remains of those 
    American Soldiers who fought in the battle of Monterrey in 1846.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2015

 Mr. DesJarlais submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
 Government of Mexico should forthwith repatriate the remains of those 
    American Soldiers who fought in the battle of Monterrey in 1846.

Whereas 169 years ago this September, Brigadier General Zachary Taylor led a 
        6,000 man military force consisting of United States Regulars, 
        Volunteers and Texas Rangers to capture the strategic town of Monterrey;
Whereas after three days of fighting, Taylor's forces captured Monterrey on 
        September 23, 1846;
Whereas the United States suffered 120 casualties during the battle, while 368 
        were wounded and 43 were reported missing;
Whereas the Mexican Government's Instituto Nacional de Antropologia y Historia 
        (INAH), in cooperation with the United States Department of State and 
        the United States Department of the Army's Armed Forces Medical Examiner 
        (AFME), has positively identified the remains of 11 United States 
        soldiers who fought in the battle of Monterrey in 1846; and
Whereas United States Department of State is working with the Mexican Government 
        to secure the repatriation of these remains: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the archaeologists, the Instituto Nacional de 
        Antropologia y Historia, the United States Consulate General 
        Monterrey and all those individuals whose diligent work led to 
        the identification and recovery of these remains; and
            (2) calls upon the Government of Mexico and the Mexican 
        Secretariat of Foreign Affairs to expeditiously release and 
        repatriate the identified remains of these United States 
        soldiers.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.20 - 2000 OFFICER BONUS PLAN

The Company has adopted a 2000 Officer Bonus Plan under which all executive
officers are awarded cash bonuses based on the Company's operating results.
The respective bonus payments are calculated with reference to the actual
pre-tax income results as measured against the 2000 Operating Plan presented
and approved at the Board of Directors meeting on January 17, 2000, excluding
results from its wholly-owned subsidiary, CreekPath Systems, Inc.  The pre-tax
income level is measured prior to any accruals reflecting the Company's bonus
payments.  No profit bonus will be paid for achievement of 50% or less of the
planned objective.  At 100% achievement, 100% of the profit bonus will be paid.
If the 2000 Operating Plan is fully achieved, 200% of the executive's bonus
will be paid.  If the Company shows a profit in its year-end results, 150% of
bonus will be paid.  If the Company is profitable for both the third and fourth
quarters, 100% of bonus will be paid.  If the Company is profitable for the
fourth quarter only, 50% of bonus will be paid.  No bonus will be paid if the
Company shows no profitability in fiscal 2000.
May 5, 1997

18609

#### State v. Martin

Affirmed
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                  Subsidiaries of American HealthChoice, Inc.


1.      AHC Chiropractic Clinics, Inc., a Texas corporation
2.      AHC Physicians Corporation, Inc., a Texas corporation
3.      Total Medical Diagnostics, Inc., a Delaware corporation
4.      Nationwide Sports and Injury, Inc., a Texas corporation
5.      United Chiropractic Clinics of Uptown, Inc., a Louisiana corporation
6.      New Orleans East Chiropractic Clinics, Inc., a Louisiana corporation
7.      AHC Clinic Management, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
8.      AHI Management, Inc., a Texas corporation
9.      Diagnostic Services, Inc., a Texas corporation
10.     Katy Sports Injury and Rehab, Incorporated, a Texas corporation
11.     Pacific Chiropractic (San Pedro), Incorporated, d/b/a United 
        Chiropractic Clinic, a Texas corporation
12.     Apple Chiropractic Clinic of Wurzbach, Incorporated, a Texas corporation
13.     Valley Family Health Center, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
EX-31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


Exhibit 31.2





I, Ray Salomon, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB/A of ECO2 Plastics, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer
and have:




a) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





b) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: August 18, 2009


By: /s/ Raymond M. Salomon


Raymond M. Salomon


Chief Financial Officer