# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16 -406VV Filed: July 21, 2016
UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JENNIFER WO LF -LECY, *

* Petitioner, *

v. * * Attorney s’ Fees and Costs;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * John R. Howie, Jr., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner. Amy P. Kokot, U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY S’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On March 30, 2016

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleged that her receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 18, 2013, caused her to suffer a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). On July 8, 2016, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on respondent ’ s proffer to which petitioner agreed. (ECF No. 14 ).

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits

wi thin this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2

On July 21, 2016

, petitioner filed a n unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 18 ). 3 Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $9,558.00

and attorneys’ costs in the amount of $678.86 for a total amount of $10,236.86. Id. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has filed a signed statement indicating petitioner incurred no out- of -pocket expenses. See Attachment 2 to Petitioner ’ s Unopposed Motion for Attorneys ’ Fees and Costs (ECF No. 18).

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable atto rneys’ fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of opposition from respondent, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s mo tion for attorneys’ fees and

costs.

Accordingly , the undersigned award s the total of $ 1 0,236.86 4 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitio ner’s counsel

John R. Howie, Jr

.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 The motion was filed as an unopposed motion and specifi es that respondent does not object to petitioner ’ s request.

4 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would

be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.

, 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.