alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021053EN.01003101.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — PlasticsEurope v ECHA

(Case T-207/18) (1)

(REACH - Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list - Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 - Manifest error of assessment - Weight of evidence approach - Exploratory studies - Intermediate uses - Proportionality)

(2021/C 53/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PlasticsEurope (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Cana, É. Mullier and F. Mattioli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and C. Buchanan, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, D. Klebs and S. Heimerl, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: A.-L. Desjonquères, J. Traband, E. Leclerc and W. Zemamta, acting as Agents), ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Kirch, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of ECHA Decision ED/01/2018 of 3 January 2018, by which the existing entry relating to bisphenol A on the list of identified substances with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136, p. 3), in accordance with Article 59 of that regulation, was supplemented to the effect that bisphenol A is also identified as a substance with endocrine disrupting properties that may have serious effects on the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern to those of other substances listed in Article 57(a) to (e) of that regulation, within the meaning of Article 57(f) thereof.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PlasticsEurope to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PlasticsEurope to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

---
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-1480

____________

RONNIE JOHNSON, 

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

____________

No. SC17-1484

____________

RONNIE JOHNSON,

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

[March 27, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Ronnie Johnson’s appeals of the circuit court’s orders

denying Johnson’s motions filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 
- 2 -

Johnson’s motions sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme 

Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on 

remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 

2161 (2017). This Court stayed Defendant’s appeals pending the disposition of 

Hitchcock v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla.), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017). 

After this Court decided Hitchcock, Johnson responded to this Court’s orders to 

show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in these cases.

After reviewing Johnson’s responses to the orders to show cause, as well as 

the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Johnson is not entitled to relief. 

Johnson was sentenced to death for the murder of Lee Arthur Lawrence following 

a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of seven to five. Johnson v. State, 

696 So. 2d 317, 320 (Fla. 1997). Johnson was also sentenced to death for the 

murder of Tequila Larkins following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote 

of nine to three. Johnson v. State, 696 So. 2d 326, 329 (Fla. 1997). Both of 

Johnson’s sentences of death became final in 1998. Johnson v. Florida, 522 U.S. 

1120 (1998); Johnson v. Florida, 522 U.S. 1095 (1998). Thus, Hurst does not 

apply retroactively to Johnson’s sentences of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 

217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Johnson’s motions.
- 3 -

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Johnson, we 

caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so 

ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 

v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 

final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 

opinion in Hitchcock.

Appeals from the Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, 

Nushin G. Sayfie, Judge - Case Nos. 131989CF0149980001XX & 

131989CF012383B000XX

Charles G. White of Charles G. White, P.A., Miami, Florida,

for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa J. Roca, 

Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, 

for Appellee
# C_2021471EN.01003601.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Rubycon and Rubycon Holdings v Commission

(Case T-344/18) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price coordination throughout the EEA - Fines - Partial immunity from fines - Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice - Reduction in the amount of the fine - Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Ceiling of 10 % of turnover - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2021/C 471/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Rubycon Corp. (Ina, Japan), Rubycon Holdings Co. Ltd (Ina) (represented by: J. Rivas Andrés and A. Federle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, L. Wildpanner and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for, first, annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 1768 final of 21 March 2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40136 — Capacitors), in so far as it concerns the applicants, and, second, a reduction in the amount of the fines imposed on them.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rubycon Corp. and Rubycon Holdings Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rubycon Corp. and Rubycon Holdings Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
# C_2019082EN.01000201.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/2

---

Appeal brought on 22 June 2018 by CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 19 April 2018 in Case T-606/17, CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-415/18 P)

(2019/C 82/02)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetriebs GmbH (represented by: A. Schuster, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 10 January 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit (iii)


                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                    TO THE
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                              CONCEPTRONIC, INC.


        CONCEPTRONIC, INC. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware,

        DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

        FIRST:    That the Board of Directors of said Corporation, adopted the
                  following resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the
                  following amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of 
                  said Corporation.

        RESOLVED: That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
                  amended by changing the First Article thereof so that, as 
                  amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

                  "The name of the corporation is Arguss Holdings, Inc."

        RESOLVED: That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
                  amended by changing the first sentence of the Fourth Article
                  thereof so that, as amended, the first sentence of said 
                  Article shall be and read as follows:

                  "The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation
                  shall have authority to issue is twenty-one million 
                  (21,000,000), consisting of twenty million (20,000,000) 
                  shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, and one 
                  million (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value
                  per share."

        SECOND:   That the aforesaid amendments were duly adopted in accordance
                  with the applicable provisions of Sections 222 and 242 of the
                  General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Conceptronic, Inc. has caused this Certificate to
be signed by Rainer H. Bosselmann, its Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, this 9th day of May, 1997.

                                                CONCEPTRONIC, INC.



                                                By:_____________________________
                                                Name: Rainer H. Bosselmann
                                                Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86350-86351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 86351]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neurological and Neuropsychological Injuries and Disorders 
II.
    Date: January 2, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Todd Everett White, Ph.D. Scientific Review, 
Officer Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-3962, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3978c8787cd948b8a9786a38d8a8bcd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a4e555e5e144d52534e5f7a545352145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 7, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-27298 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
930 P.2d 1019

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

17423

#### Atchley v. Viking Const

December 30, 1996

Order No. 96-43

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Notice of Availability — Finding of No

Significant Impact for Avian

Deterrence to Support Passage of

Juvenile Salmonids at Bonneville, The

Dalles, and John Day Projects in

Washington

Print

Notice of Adoption and Decision – Washington. Wildlife Services, a program within

the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

(APHIS-WS), has adopted the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) Environmental

Assessment (EA): Avian Deterrence to Support Passage of Juvenile Salmonids at

Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day Projects, and has issued a Decision and Finding

of No Significant Impact (FONSI).  The final EA and the Corps’ Decision and FONSI

can be viewed in the Regulations.gov Docket APHIS-2024-0016. 

APHS-WS cooperated in the preparation of the analysis, reviewed the Final EA, and

independently concluded the document meets the standards for an adequate

assessment consistent with 40 CFR 1506.10.  The Decision and FONSI document

APHIS-WS’s decision to assist the Corps in the implementation of Alternative B,

which expands the methods available for use to reduce avian predation on ESA-
listed salmonids at 3 hydroelectric projects (dams) on the Columbia River. 

Alternative B is an integrated wildlife damage management approach that

introduces the use of live capture/relocation, falconry, and lethal reinforcement of

nonlethal methods to increase the efficacy of the current exclusion and deterrence

approach. 

Interested parties may view the Final EA, Decision, and FONSI at:

View Docket: APHIS-2024-0016

If you would like a copy of the final EIS and/or the ROD sent to you by mail,

WS-Washington asks that you mail a written request to:

Washington Wildlife Services State Director

720 O’Leary St NW

Olympia, WA 98502

When submitting a request by mail, please include a mailing address.
Spotted Lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula)

Directions: color, then cut on dotted lines to create your own mask 

Minersville, PA 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      32,135,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,782,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                   795,320
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            55,578,055
<PP&E>                                      18,855,866
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,492,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,506,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,332,085
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,381
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,813,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,506,755
<SALES>                                     25,340,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,202,434
<CGS>                                        1,324,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,896,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            43,004,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               109,392
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,395,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,318,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,077,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,077,052
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<FN>
<F1>This amount is reported as EPS BASIC.
</FN>


</TABLE>
190 P.3d 192

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

July 23, 2008

28167

#### State v. Frustagli

Vacated and Remanded
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0028

_____________________________
J AMES M ARK G EORGE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon
, Jr., Judge

. October 24, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P . 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Robin B. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
# C_2018182EN.01001501.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 19 March 2018 — Mydibel S.A. v État belge

(Case C-201/18)

(2018/C 182/18)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Mons

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mydibel S.A.

Applicant:

Respondent: État belge

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Articles 14, 15, 168, 184, 185, 187 and 188 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) be interpreted and applied as meaning that there is, or is not, a revision/adjustment of VAT on an investment good comprising immovable property which had initially been deducted correctly, in the case where that immovable property acquired as a capital good was the subject of a ‘sale and lease back’ transaction, given that:

1

| — | the ‘sale and lease back’ is created by the combined and simultaneous granting of a right of emphyteusis (being a temporary right in rem) by the taxable person to two financial institutions and by a leasing by those two institutions to the taxable person; |
| --- | --- |

—

the ‘sale and lease back’ is created by the combined and simultaneous granting of a right of emphyteusis (being a temporary right in rem) by the taxable person to two financial institutions and by a leasing by those two institutions to the taxable person;

| — | that ‘sale and lease back’ is a purely financial transaction designed to increase the liquidity of the taxable person; |
| --- | --- |

—

that ‘sale and lease back’ is a purely financial transaction designed to increase the liquidity of the taxable person;

| — | the ‘sale and lease back’ transaction was not subject to VAT; |
| --- | --- |

—

the ‘sale and lease back’ transaction was not subject to VAT;

| — | the investment property remained in the possession of the taxable person and was used for the taxable activity of the taxable person in a continuous and sustainable manner, both before and after the transaction? |
| --- | --- |

—

the investment property remained in the possession of the taxable person and was used for the taxable activity of the taxable person in a continuous and sustainable manner, both before and after the transaction?

Does an interpretation and application of the abovementioned provisions leading to a revision/adjustment of the VAT initially deducted comply with the principle of neutrality of VAT and/or with the principle of equal treatment??

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85335-85336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

[[Page 85336]]


DATES: Date of required notice: December 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 116 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-73, CP2024-75.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-26814 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P