alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 531 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 19, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4038) to 

require that supplemental certifications and background investigations be completed prior to the admission of certain 

aliens as refugees, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 

(2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2019206EN.01004101.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/41

---

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2019 — Electroquimica Onubense v ECHA

(Case T-481/18) (1)

(REACH - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 206/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Electroquimica Onubense (Palos de la Frontera, Spain) (represented by D.González Blanco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by J.-P Trnka, C.-M. Bergerat and M. Heikkila, acting as Agents, and C. García Molyneux, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against ECHA Decision SME D(2018)2931-DC of 31 May 2018, finding that the applicant does not fulfil the requirements for the fee reduction provided for in respect of small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Electroquimica Onubense, SL is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Electroquimica Onubense, SL is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Jesse Tyrone Baily v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00432-CR

Trial court case number: A-15-0061-SA

Trial court: 51st District Court of Tom Green County

The Clerk of the Court has examined the clerk’s record and has found that it does not 

comport with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in that it does not include a copy of the trial 

court’s certification of appellant’s right of appeal that corresponds to the trial court’s February 21, 

2019 judgment.

1

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 34.5(a)(12). 

Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to secure a 

proper Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal in compliance with Rule 25.2(d). See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be included in a 

supplemental clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2). The trial court shall cause the 

supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court no later than 20 days from the 

date of this order. See id. This order constitutes notice to all parties of the defective certification. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sherry Radack_____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

1 The record does contain a Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal, but it is dated June 

12, 2015 and only applies to appellant’s plea of June 12, 2015, which resulted in the trial 

court’s June 12, 2015 judgment placing appellant on community supervision. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (requiring trial court to enter certification each time it enters judgment 

or appealable order); Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 912, 913 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006). The record therefore does not contain a certification that pertains to the trial court’s 

February 21, 2019 judgment adjudicating appellant’s guilt.
Date: ____March 17, 2020___
# C_2019295EN.01003702.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/37

---

Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — Fugro v Commission

(Case T-317/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Galileo satellite navigation programme - Technical and operational specifications - Lack of individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2019/C 295/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fugro NV (Leidschendam, Netherlands) (represented by: initially, T. Snoep and V. van Weperen and, subsequently, V. van Weperen, H. Gornall and J. de Pree, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Armati and B. Sasinowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/321 of 2 March 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 setting out the technical and operational specifications allowing the commercial service offered by the system established under the Galileo programme to fulfil the function referred to in Article 2(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2018 L 62, p. 34), and, in the alternative, for annulment of Article 1(2) of that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Fugro NV is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fugro NV is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
20604

#### State v. Samonte

Affirmed
#### Ronald Lee WOLFE v. Elbert V. NASH, Warden, Mo. State Penitentiary.

No. 17507.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 27, 1963.

James B. Herd and James J. Sauter, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.

Thomas F. Eagleton, Atty. Gen., for the State of Missouri, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Application for Certificate of Probable cause to be filed without payment of filing fee; application for certificate of probable cause denied and application for stay of execution of sentence denied.
#### Flowers v. Child Support Enforcement Agency

20198

10/26/98

Affirmed in part & Vacated in part
Exhibit
23.1
   CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-81774, 333-112823, 333-114274, 333-114274-01 and 333-114274-02)
and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-50793, 333-72156 and
333-101506) of Ameren Corporation of our report dated February 22, 2005 relating
to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.
 
 
 /s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 St.
Louis, Missouri
 March 9,
2005
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Third Amendment”) is made this 15th day of December, 2016, effective as of
January 1, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), by and between PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and VIRGINIA E. SHANKS, an individual (“Executive”), with respect to the
following facts and circumstances: 
 RECITALS 

The Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on October 13, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), with Executive
having a base salary of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) per year. 
 On December 18, 2014, effective as of January 1,
2015, the Company and Executive entered into that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “First Amendment”) and on December 21, 2015, effective as of January 1, 2016, the Company and the Executive entered into that
certain Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Second Amendment” and, together with the Employment Agreement and the First Amendment, the “Agreement”). 

Effective as of January 1, 2017, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to increase Executive’s base salary to Six
Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($660,000) per year. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements set
forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 AMENDMENT 

1. Effective as of January 1, 2017, Article 3, Section 3.1 of the Agreement (Base Salary) is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following new Article 3, Section 3.1: 
 “3.1 Base Salary. In consideration for Executive’s services
hereunder, the Company shall pay Executive an annual base salary at the rate of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($660,000.00) per year effective as of January 1, 2017 through the end of the Term; payable in accordance with the Company’s
regular payroll schedule from time to time (less any deductions required for Social Security, state, federal and local withholding taxes, and any other authorized or mandated similar withholdings).” 

2. Except as modified herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the
terms of the Agreement and this Third Amendment, the terms of this Third Amendment shall apply. No modification may be made to the Agreement or this Third Amendment except in writing and signed by both the Company and Executive. 

  
 - 1 - 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to be duly as of the date
first written above. 
  

							
	EXECUTIVE	  		  	PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
				
	 /s/ Virginia E. Shanks
	  		  	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony M. Sanfilippo

	Virginia E. Shanks	  		  		 	Anthony M. Sanfilippo,
		  		  		 	Chief Executive Officer


  
 - 2 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 4, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 130 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-95, CP2024-97.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-27408 Filed 12-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
***Exhibit 23.01 – Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(File Nos. 333-96647, 333-100060 and 333-102657) and S-8 (File Nos. 033-63701, 333-42727,333-94075, 333-94745, 333-41116, 333-62876, 333-69518, 333-109435, 333-128180, 333-128182 and 333-133416) ofWeb.com, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2007 relating to the financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc.
(the Company) for the nine months ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay N.
Torok, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Jay N. TorokJay N. TorokChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)January 13, 2004


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. This certification is not being filed as part of this Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron
Markovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lapis Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

June 25, 2004                                   /s/ Miron Markovitz
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Miron Markovitz
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

April 14, 2017

Order 

Clerk

April 14, 2017

154062(74)(77)(78)

MENARD, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellant, 

SC: 154062

v COA: 325718

MTT: 00-441600; 14-001918-TT

CITY OF ESCANABA,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of (1) the Michigan Municipal 

League Legal Defense Fund, Michigan Townships Association, Public Corporation Law 

Section of the State Bar of Michigan, and Michigan Association of Counties, (2) the 

Michigan Assessors Association, International Association of Assessing Officers, and 

Michigan Association of Equalization Directors, and (3) the Michigan Realtors to file 

briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The amicus briefs submitted by those groups are 

accepted for filing.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-462, OMB Control No. 3235-0521]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 425

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 425 (17 CFR 230.425) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) requires the filing of certain prospectuses and 
communications under Rule 135 (17 CFR 230.135) and Rule 165 (17 CFR 
230.165) in connection with business combination transactions. The 
purpose of the rule is to permit more oral and written communications 
with shareholders about tender offers, mergers and other business 
combination transactions on a more-timely basis, so long as the written 
communications are filed on the date of first use. The information 
provided under Rule 425 is made available to the public upon request. 
Also, the information provided under Rule 425 is mandatory. 
Approximately 7,160 issuers file communications under Rule 425 at an 
estimated 0.25 hours per response for a total of 1,790 annual burden 
hours (0.25 hours per response x 7,160 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
by January 10, 2024 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) 
David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, or by sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1f1f3e0feecc0c8cdc3ced9e1d2c4c28fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2a2a0b3adbf939b9e909d8ab2819791dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 6, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27148 Filed 12-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Insects and Mites

Last Modified: 

Print

A PPQ 526 permit is required for the importation, interstate movement and

environmental release of most insects and mites that feed upon or infest plants or

plant products, including agricultural crops, trees, shrubs, native plants, etc.

Apply for a Permit

If you plan to import an exotic insect or mite, you will most likely be required to

import the organism into an inspected containment facility. The following factors are

taken into consideration when evaluating the level of containment required to

receive imported insects and mites:

whether the organism is indigenous to the U.S;

whether the organism is indigenous to the area where you plan to move it;

host plant availability;

size and mobility of organism;

life stage to be moved;

number of organisms to be shipped; and

whether you plan to maintain a colony or destroy them upon arrival. 

Packages of insects or mites being shipped must not contain any plant material, soil,

or other plant pests not authorized in the permit. Packages being imported will be

inspected by USDA officials at the port of entry. In addition, the importer is

responsible for complying with other Federal or State requirements (e.g.

Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, etc.). Please note
that a completed U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Form 3-177 may be required.

USDA does not require permits for dead insects and mites (with the exception of

dead bees in the superfamily Apoidea under the authority of 7CFR 319.76). Under

7CFR 330.200 “Biological specimens of plant pests, in preservation or dried, may be

imported without further restriction under this part, but subject to inspection on

arrival in the United States to confirm the nature of the material and freedom from

risk of plant pest dissemination.” A U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Form 3-177 may be

required.

We also suggest that you review list of the domestic quarantine notices. This link

has the current federal regulations regarding the interstate movement of specific

plant pests, plant diseases, and plants. Each subpart (major heading) covers a

different organism.

Permits are also required for the following types of organisms or activities:

Butterflies and Moths in Educational Programs or Public Displays

Insects in Zoos and Museums

Drosophila flies

The movement of genetically modified organisms require permits from

Biotechnology Regulatory Services.

The movement of insects, mites and ticks that affect animals or vector animal

diseases require permits from Veterinary Services.

The movement of insects, mites and ticks that affect man or vector human diseases

require permits from the Centers for Disease Control.

Frequently Asked Questions

View a list of the commonly asked questions and concerns associated with the

application process for insects and mites.

Permit Eligibility for Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Workers

PPQ Permits Contact Information:

Telephone: (301) 851-2285

FAX: (301) 734-8700
Email: pest.permits@usda.gov
20059

#### State v. Semitara

Affirmed
#### State v. Yamamoto

20665

2/19/98

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2018427EN.01010401.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/104 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/104

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO (E PLUS)

(Case T-339/18) (1)

(2018/C 427/140)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.

---