alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this 10-K/A Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated:  May 3, 2004

/s/  CARROLL A. WALLACE
#### Ed Maddox, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed June 7, 1915.

1. An application for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the ruling thereon will not be disturbed by the appellate court unless an abuse of judicial discretion therein to the disadvantage of the complaining party is made to clearly appear.

*6962. The verdict is sustained by the evidence.

Writ of error to Circuit Court for Escambia County; J. Emmet Wolfe, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

*W. L. Zachary*and *E. T.*Davis, for Plaintiff in Error;.

*T. F.*West, Attorney General, and *O. O.*Andrews, Assistant, for the State.

Whitfield, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of murder in the first degree and took writ of error. It is 'Contended here that error was committed in denying a motion for a continuance and that the verdict is not supported by the evidence.

An application for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the ruling thereon will not be disturbed by the appellate court unless an abuse of judicial discretion therein to the disadvantage of the complaining party is made to clearly appear. Webster v. State, 47 Fla. 108, 36 South. Rep. 584.

The affidavit on which the application was based states that an absent witness “was an eye witness to the murder” and does not state what the absent witness would testify to. There was an eye witness to the homicide who did testify and it does not appear that the absent witness who was outside of the house could have seen the fatal shot fired in the house, therefore his testimony could at best have been merely cumulative, it not appearing that it would have contradicted the testimony of the eye witness who testified.

*697Error is not made to appear in the order denying a continuance.

The testimony is ample to sustain the verdict, and as no error of law appears the judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell and Ellis, JJ., concur.
19538

#### State v. Prescott

February 27, 1997

Order No. 97-23

Affirmed
June 6, 1997

19114

#### Nam v. Yoshida

Affirmed
# C_2018436EN.01006403.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/64

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2018 — Cabell v EUIPO — Zorro Productions (ZORRO)

(Case T-96/18) (1)

(2018/C 436/91)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.

---
June 9, 2008

28538

#### State v. Riveira

Affirmed
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 48969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10 a.m., Friday September 21, 2012.

PLACE:  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-20117 Filed 8-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Annual Report of First Financial Service Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and; 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company;  Date: March 31, 2011

          

          By:/s/ B. Keith JohnsonB. Keith Johnson Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 31, 2011

          

          By:/s/ Gregory S. SchreackeGregory S. Schreacke President Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Old v. Hunter Engineering Co.

20657

06/27/2003

Affirmed, vacated in part and remanded
#### Tenno v. Broderick

16769 & 16770

12/12/96

Vacated and Remanded
83 P.3d 115

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

January 20, 2004

25664

#### Doe, In re

Vacated and Remanded
# C_2019122EN.01000801.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 20 December 2018 — JZ

(Case C-806/18)

(2019/C 122/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Party to the main proceedings

Applicant: JZ

Question referred

Is the criminalisation under national law which criminalises the stay of a third-country national in the territory of the Netherlands after an entry ban has been imposed on him pursuant to Article 66a(7) of the Vreemdelingenwet 2000 compatible with EU law, in particular with the finding of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the judgment of 26 July 2017, Ouhrami v Netherlands (C-225/16, EU:C:2017:590, paragraph 49) according to which the entry ban provided for in Article 11 of the Return Directive (1) produces its ‘effects’ only from the point in time the foreign national has returned to his country of origin or to another third country, when national law also holds that that foreign national has no lawful residence and moreover it is established that the steps of the return procedure set out in the Return Directive have been followed but the actual return has not taken place?

---

(1)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

---
December 1, 2010

Mr. Kern S. Mosher

4338 Pinewood Circle Beaufort, SC 29906

Dear Mr. Mosher:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for rulemaking. It acknowledges receipt of the petition.

We Have the Petition

We have received your October 5, 2010, petition requesting a revision to part 45 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). We have added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2010-1147) and we are processing it. In your letter you made references to attachments. However, we did not receive any attachments in either the mailed letter or in the docket. Please provide the attachments by attaching them to your docket. If you have any questions, you may contact me at (202) 493-5708.

Sincerely,

/s/ Katherine Haley Transportation Industry Analyst Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Resilient Infrastructure + Secure Energy Consortium (“RISE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Beacon Industries, Inc., Newington, CT; IEEECyber Security, Inc., York, PA; Mechanical Solutions, Inc., Whippany, NJ; MPR Associates, Inc., Alexandria, VA; NGU Sports Lighting, Palm Beach Gardens, FL; Potorti Enterprises, Inc., Floyds Knobs, IN; and Venturi LLC, Huntsville, AL have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and RISE intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On July 2, 2021, RISE filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 23, 2021 (86 FR 47155).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 7, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2023 (88 FR 66057).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-27559 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### Felipe v. State Farm Ins. Co.

23466

02/24/2005

Affirmed
June 24, 2002

23338

#### Empress Restaurant & Nightclub, Inc. v. Longevity Intern. Enterprises Corp.

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT**

**OF**

**EXABYTE CORPORATION**

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004**

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Exabyte Corporation (“Exabyte”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-K Report of Exabyte for the year ended December 31, 2004.

We certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exabyte.

This Certification is executed as of March 18, 2005.

| /s/ TOM W. WARD |
|-----------------|

Tom W. Ward

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

| /s/ CARROLL A. WALLACE |
|------------------------|

Carroll A. Wallace

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### State v. Namauu

19848

5/23/97

Affirmed
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden & Blake Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the
undersigned:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.






Date:    August 14, 2002                 /s/ John L. Schwager
      ----------------------            -----------------------------
                                        John L. Schwager, Director, President
                                        and Chief Executive Officer




Date:    August 14, 2002                 /s/ Robert W. Peshek
      ----------------------            -----------------------------
                                        Robert W. Peshek, Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86931-86932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Decentralized Storage Alliance Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Decentralized Storage 
Alliance Association (``DSAA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Intel, Santa Clara, CA; and Seal Storage, 
Toronto, CANADA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DSAA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 1, 2023, DSAA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal

[[Page 86932]]

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 
69670).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-27586 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
9/20/2018; Last reviewed/formatted May 2023 Page 1 of 1

Pale Cyst Nematode Program Deregulation Protocol for Regulated Non-Agricultural Land

All regulated land in this category 

may be released if it meets the 

following criteria:

Records must be made

available to APHIS to 

demonstrate the land has been 

out of agricultural production 

for the last 20 years and will 

not return to agriculture.

Summary: A deregulation option exists for pale cyst nematode (PCN) regulated fields (associated 

or infested status) that are converted to a non-agricultural use. Non-agricultural use includes but is 

not limited to, highways or other paved roads, paved parking lots, industrial parks, other 

commercial developments (such as shopping malls, apartment housing, and office complexes), 

residential developments, state or national parks, other recreational areas, racetracks, golf 

courses, etc. 

Construction for nonagricultural purposes has 

rendered the land non-tillable 

and the land is not likely to 

ever return to agricultural 

purposes.

or

Release from regulation
December 19, 2003

24913

#### Jane Doe, In re

Affirmed
#### Tyler v. Befurt

15488

1/26/93

Denied
# C_2019044EN.01008301.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/83

---

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2018 — European Anglers Alliance v Council

(Case T-252/18) (1)

(2019/C 44/115)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
#### Samuel B. BRISTOW, Jr., Petitioner, v. Park J. ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent.

No. H-73-455.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 19, 1974.

Samuel B. Bristow, Jr., pro se.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

This is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in which Samuel B. Bristow, Jr., hereinafter referred to as petitioner, alleges that respondent is violating his constitutional rights for the following reasons:

> “Have refused to allow petitioner to have enough paper and envelopes to petition the courts with; access to or use of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary Law Library; that the Respondent has refused to mail petitioner’s petitions to the courts.”

It is interesting to note that this Court has received copies of either Advisory Opinions or Orders Denying Writs in regard to petitioner, from the Honorable Robert J. Bell,1 District Judge of Pittsburg County, dated as follows:

> March 3, 1973

> April 19, 1973

> May 9, 1973 (2 Orders this date)

> June 4, 1973

> June 13, 1973

> July 25, 1973

> November 5, 1973.

In addition to the above Orders and/or Advisory Opinions, this Court has denied writs to petitioner on October 3, 1972 in A-17,690; April 18, 1973 in A-18,175, and August 3, 1973 in H-73-194.

*538Thus, it is apparent, that petitioner has been allowed paper, access to and use of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary Law Library, and said petitions were mailed, inasmuch as petitioner has been answered, eleven (11) times prior to the instant cause. This Court adopts the reasoning of Roberts v. Pepersack, 256 F.Supp. 415 (D. Md.1966), wherein they state:

> “The cases indicate that the interdiction of access to the courts must be alleged in order for the denial of legal materials to be considered as a deprivation of a constitutional right.

> 3⁄8 3⁄8 3⁄8: * * >K

> In this case, the voluminous mass of petitions and letters bears witness to the fact that Roberts has not been impeded or discouraged by whatever regulations were in effect.”

In all future cases, we do not intend, nor do we feel it is the duty of the trial judge, to entertain repeated writs dealing with frivolous assertions.

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.

BLISS, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

1

. Judge Bell is to be commended for his patience and diligence in dealing with the above mentioned writs filed in his court by this petitioner.
18976

#### Frederickson v. Admin. Director

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 2023.

# PLACE: 

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7B, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. NCUA Operating Fee Schedule Methodology.

2. NCUA's 2024-2025 Budget.

3. Request for Comment, NCUA Overhead Transfer Rate (OTR) Methodology.

4. Central Liquidity Facility's 2024 Budget.

*(The NCUA Board, in its capacity as the Central Liquidity Facility Board).*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-27293 Filed 12-8-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
#### Inouye v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.

15556

4/15/93

Denied