# Revision to Georgia's State Implementation Plan To Incorporate the Requirements of



# Clean Air Act Section l82(b)(2)(A) e Group 11 Control Techniques Guidelines

State of Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division 

## Air Protection Branch

## TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 REGULATORYBACKGROUND

# ................................................................................... 1 2.0 FLEXIBLE PACKAGE PRINTING 

# ............................................................................... 3



# ................................................. 3.0 

### LITHOGRAPHIC

### AND LETTERPRESSPRINTING 

### 8 4.0 INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SOLVENTS 

# ..................................................................... 13 5.0 FLAT WOOD PANELING

# ............................................................................................. 16

### EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 182(b)(2)(A)provides that, for certain nonattainment areas, States must revise their State Implementation Plans (SIPS)to include reasonably available control technology (RACT) for each category of volatile organic compound (VOC) sources covered by a control techniques guidelines (CTG) document issued between November 15, 1990, and the date of attainment. In addition, section 182(b)(2) requires that a CTG issued between November 15, 1990, and the date of attainment include the date by which States subject to Section 182(b) must submit SIP revisions in responseto the CTG. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) addressed source categories of VOC emissions in accordance with CAA Section 183(e) on October 5, 2006, by amending 40 CFR Part 59 Subpat A Section 59.1 for Consumer and Commercial Products, Group I1 [71 FR 587451: Control Techniques Guidelines in Lieu of Regulations for Flexible Packaging Printing Materials, Lithographic Printing Materials, Letterpress Printing Materials, Industrial Cleaning Solvents, and Flat Wood Paneling Coating. Stateswith moderate or above ozone nonattainment areas as ofthat date were required to submit SIPrevisions to EPA addressingthese requirements on or before October 7,2009. Source categories coveredunder the "Group 11" heading are: Flexiblepackagingprintingmaterials; o 

### Lithographic printing materials;
0 

### Letterpressprinting materials;


# . Industrial cleaning solvents; and o 

### Flat wood paneling coatings. EPA consolidatedlithographic printingmaterials and letterpressprintingmaterials into one CTG document. The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (Georgia EPD) undertook the task of reviewing existing VOC control measures for industry groups covered by the federal 2006 Group I1 CTGs using the Group I1 CTGs and EPA's Blue ~oolt.'The location of the industry groups for this study are those located in the current 20-county Atlanta 8- hour ozone moderate non-attainment area consisting of Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeICalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Rocltdale, Spalding and Walton counties. Each CTG 

# 'Issues Relatingto VOC RegulationCutpoints. Deficiencies, and Deviations-Clarification to A~~endix D ofNovember 24. 1987FederalRegister, May 25, 1988,EPA OzoneICarbonMonoxide PsogamBranch, Air QualityManagement Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards.

1

### contains applicability, emission limitation, compliance methods, and monitoring guidelines. Georgiahas adoptedthe Group 

### I1 CTGs as follows: CTG Category 

### FlexiblePackage Printing Lithographic Printing Materials Letterpress Printing Materials Industrial Cleaning Solvents Flat Wood Paneling Coatings Changes to the Georgia Rules 

### Amended 391-3-1-.02(2)(mm) "VOC Emissions from GraphicArts Systems" Amended 391-3-1-.02(2)(ddd) "VOC Emissions from

Offset Lithography"
New Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(aaaa) Amended 391-3-1-.02(2)(jj) "VOC Emissions from Surface Coating ofFlat Wood Paneling" Adoption Date 

### 1/25/2012 Compliance Date 

### 1/1/2015

Georgia is submitting this Group I1 

### CTG 

### SIP revision, in accordance with CAA Section 182@)(2)(A),that addresses the changes to existing VOC control measures in Georgia Chapter 391-3-1. Itis important tonote that the State of Georgia did not rely on thereduction of VOCs as part of its control strategyfor the attainment of the National Ambient Air Qiiality Standards (NAAQS) for 8-hour ozone. Anthropogenic VOCs are overwhelmed by biogenic VOCs in the Southeast resulting in NOx-limited ozone formation as detailed in the Atlanta 8-hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration submitted to EPA on October 

### 21,2009.

### Georgia GroupI1CTG SIP Revision 

## 1.0 

# REGULATORY BACKGROUND 1.1 Atlanta OzoneNonattainmentArea Under the former l-how ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), the previous 13-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area, consisting of Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeICalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hemy, Padding and Rocltdale Counties, was classified as a severe nonattainment area. As a part of the nonattainment designation, Georgia EPD implemented control measures for ozone precursors VOC and NOx that fulfilled the purposes of Section 182(b)(2) for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. These control measures' provisions are still in place as part of the approved 1-hour ozone metro Atlanta maintenanceplan. On April 30, 2004, the Atlanta nonattainment area was initially designated as a marginal nonattainment areaunder the 1997 8-hour ozoneNAAQS and expanded from the original 13-county area to a 20-county nonattaimnent area by adding Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Hall, Newton, Spalding and Walton Counties. Atlanta was reclassified as a moderate nonattainment area onMarch 6,2008. As presented in the Atlanta %how Ozone Attainment Demonstration submitted to EPA on October 21,2009, Georgia EPD has demonstratedthat the Atlanta Nonattainment area does not rely on VOCS to meet attainment for ozone and is considered a NOx-limited area due to overwhelming naturally occurring biogenic VOCs. The analyses of ozone, NO, and NOx data using the ozone M.A.P.P.E.R. program showed that ozone formation in Atlanta is generally transitional to NOx-limited, but when the results were binned accordingto the dailymaximum %hour ozone, ozone formationwas stronglyNOxlimited on days of elevated ozone. An 

### analysis of weekend/weelday differences in ozone concentration also .indicate a generally NOx-limited regime, with ozone formation becomingmore NOx-limited in recent years compared to the late 1990s. These findings are generallyInagreement with several studies of the trends and limiting factors for ozone fomation in Atlanta. Pun et al. (2003)' investigated the weekly patterns of ozone in Atlanta and found elevated midweek concentrations compared to weekends, with stronger weeldy patterns in later years (1995-1999 compared to 1986- 1990), concluding that the availability ofNOx drives the weekly ozone cycle in Atlanta. Analyzing various aircraft measurements, Sillman et al. (1997)~ concluded that Atlanta ozone is mostlyNOx limited, using variousindicatorratios. 1.2 Clean AirAct Section 182(b)(2)Requirements Section 182(b)(2)of the CleanAir Act (CAA) requires that a federal Control Technique Guideline (CTG) issued between November 15, 1990, and the date of attainment include the date by which States subjectto Section 182(b)must submit SIPrevisions inresponse

Pun, B. I<.,C. Seigneur, and W. White (2003). Day-of-weekbehavior of atmospheric ozone in threeU.S. cities. J. Air & Waste Management Assoc. 53,789-801. 3.

Slllman, S., D. He, C. Cardelino, andR. E. Imhoff (1997).The use ofpliotochemical'indicatorsto evaluate ozone-NOx-hydrocarbonsensitivity: Case studiesfromAtlanta, New York, and Los Angeles. J. Air & Waste ManagementAssoc., 47,1030-1040.

### Georgia Group 

### 11CTG SIP Revision
to the CTG to include reasonably available controltechnology (RACT) for each category ofvolatile organic compound (VOC) sources coveredby a CTG. RACT is defined as the lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economical feasibility (44 FR 53762; September 17, 1979). Docun~ents useful in establishing RACT include Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs), Alternative Control Technique guidance (ACT), Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), and Best Available Control Technology (BACT) standards. MCTrequirements are included in the CAA to assure that significant source categories at major sources of ozone precursor emissions are controlled to 

### a "reasonable" extent, but not necessarily to BACT levels expected of new major sources or major modifications to existing major sources or to MACT required for major sources ofhazardous air pollutants. EPA addressed the Group I1 source categories with promulgation of a "Notice of Final Determination and Availability ofFinal Control Techniques Guidelines" dated October 5, 2006 [71 FR 587451. States with ozone nonattaimnent areas classified as moderate or above as of that date were required to submit SIP revisions to EPA addressing these requirements on or before October 

### 7, 2009. Source categories covered under the "Group II" 

### heading are: 

## * Flexiblepackaging printing materials; Lithographicprinting materials; Letterpress printing materials; Industrialcleaning solvents; and Flat wood paneling coatings. 1.3 Conclusion 

### Georgia EPD undertook the task of reviewing existing VOC control measxres for industry groups covered by the federal 2006 Group I1 CTGs. This SIP revision contains a chapter for each Group I1CTG.

## 2.0 

## FLEXIBLE PACKAGE PRINTING
2.1 Regulatory Background

# - Federal Flexiblepackaging refers to any package or patof a package, the shape ofwhich can be readily changed. Flexible packaging includes, but is not limited to, bags, pouches, liners, and wraps utilizing paper, plastic, film, aluminum foil, metalized or coated paper or film, or any combination of these materials. Printing on flexiblepackaging is almost entirely conductedby rotogravure and wide-web flexographic printing. Therehave been two federal actionsthat affectflexiblepackage printing operationsprior to 2006. In December 1978, EPA issued a CTG document (1978 CTG) for graphic arts (rotogravure printing and flexographicprinting) that included flexiblepackage printing.4 Then, in May of 1996, EPA promulgated a national emission standard for theprinting and publishing industry, 40 

### CFR Part 63

### SubpartKK -National Emission Standards for HuzardousAir Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Printing and Publishing Industry which is applicableto flexible pacltage printing. 2.2 Regulatory Background 

# - State GeorgiaEPD implemented GeorgiaRule 391-3-1-.02(2)(mm) "VOC Emissions from Graphic Ask 

### Systems" [aka.Georgia Rule (mm)] to fulfill the VOC RACT requirements for the 1-hourozoneNAAQS. Georgia Rule (mm) was based on the 1978 federal CTG. This CTG addressed both flexiblepackage and publication printing industries, the nature of VOC emissions from those industries and the availablecontrol options along with the cost of those options. Becausehistorically, graphic arts operations utilized coatings and inks with a high solvent content,the 1978CTGrecommended control technology as a technologically and economicallyfeasible option. A seventy-fivepercent (75%) capture efficiency with a ninetypercent (90%) control efficiency was considered a reasonable control option. Additionally, VOC content limits were recommended as alternatives. It should be noted that Georgia Rule (mm) did NOT specify a capture efficiencybut instead required a "capture system approved by the Director." The 1978CTG did not, however, recommend an applicabilitythreshold. 2.3 Does the Existing Georgia l-hour Ozone RACT Fulfill the 8-hour Ozone RACT forthis Industry Sector? In December 2006. EPA issued an uvdated CTG (2006 CTG) document for controlline. 

# - VOC emissions from flexible packageprinting. The following tables comparethe ~pplicability threshold recommendations under the 2006 CTG and the existing state rule usid to re&late the category.

4~uideline Series. Control ofVolatile Organic En~issions *om Existing Stationaty Sources -Volume VIII: GraphicAits -Rotogravure and Flexography. PublicationNo. EPA-45012-78-033. U.S. EPA, June 1978.

### Georgia Group 

### I1 CTG SIPRevision Annlicabilit~~: Table 2.3.1 specifies the existing VOC emission applicabilitythresholds for flexiblepackage printing:

Metro Area of

7-County

*Note 15lbsId bemg subject to EPA recornmen VOC Emission Applicability Thresholds -Flexible Georgia Rule (mm) 2006 CTGRecommended Applicability Emission Threshold Threshold facility

PTE: 100 from a facility

of actoal faciliw-wide emis Actual: 15 lbsldaybefore. controls for work practice standards PTE: 25 tpy from an individualpress for emission

control measures 

# L

sions before controls is the applicabilit ork practice stabdardsfor cleaning. At the higher potential emissi control options. controlmeasures Actual: 15 lbsldaybefore contlols for work practice standards PTE: 25 tpy from an individual press for emission ~cltage Printing Revised Georgia Rule (mm) Applicability Threshold VOC" Actual: 15lbslday before controls for work practice standards PTE: 25tpy fiom a facility for existing control measures and 25 tpy from a press for new control measures Actual: 15lbslday before controls PTE: 100tpy from a facilityfor existing control measures and 25 tpy from a press for new control measures hreslmld for the rule and results in a facilit tlmshold of 25tpy from an individual pres! 

### Applicability thresholds for flexiblepackage printing were not referenced in EPA's Blue Book or in the 1978 CTG. The VOC applicability threshold for Georgia Rule 

### (mm) has varied depending on the attainmentdesignation of the Atlanta area, but currently is set at 25 tons per year inthe original thirteen 1-how ozone nonattainment counties because of the Atlanta area's status as a severe ozone nonattainment area for the previous 1-hour standard [Section 182(b)(2)(C)]. When the nonattainment area was expanded for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard with a marginal designation, the applicability threshold remained at 100 tons per year for those additional 7 counties that were previously attainment for the I-hour standard. There are twelve laown affected facilities subjectto Georgia Rule 

### (rnm). Emission Standards for Flexible Package Printing: For facilities with actual emissions greater than 15lbs per day, EPA recommends that the facilityimplement work practice standards for cleaning that include storing allVOC-containing cleaningmaterials and used shop towels in closed containers; ensuringthat storage containersused for these materials are kept closed at all times except when accessing the containers; minimizing spills of the VOC-containing cleaning materials; conveying these materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes; and minimizing VOC emissions fiom the cleaning processes associated with application, storage, mixing, and conveying equipment. This should be done by ensuring that equipment cleaning is performed without atomizing the cleaning solvent and all spent solvent is captured in closed containers.

### Georgia Group 

### I1 CTG 

### SIPRevision For individual presses with a potential to emit (PTE) of 25 tons of VOCs per year, 

### EPA recommends an overall VOC control efficiency based on both the year a printing press was installed and the yeas any add-on air pollution control device was initially installed. The following timelines indicate therecommended control efficiency: 1. Sixty-five percent (65%) for a press that was first installed prior to 

### March 14, 1995, and that is controlled by an add-on air pollution control device whose first installation date was prior to 

### the effective date of therule. 2. Seventy percent (70%) for a 

### press that was first installed prior to 

### March 14, 1995, and that is controlled by an add-on air pollution control device whose first installation date was on or after 

### the effective date of the rule. 3. Seventy-fivepercent (75%) for a press that was first installed on or after 

### March 14, 1995, and that is controlled by an add-on air pollution control device whose first installation date was prior to 

### the effective date of the rule. 4. Eighty percent (80%) for a press that was first installed on or after 

### March 14, 1995 and that is controlled by an add-on air pollution control device whose first installation date was on or after 

### the effective date ofthe sule. Table 2.3.2 compares the recommended control strategies of the 2006 federal CTG with the existing emission standardsin GeorgiaRule (mm). Table 2.3.2 VOC Emission Control Strategiesfor Flexible Package Printing



### There is no exact correlationto determine if GeorgiaRule (mm) orthe 2006 CTG is more stringent. Most printing facilities in the nonattaimnent area have captuse systems that qualify as 

### permanent total enclosures, which are assumed to have 100% capture around each press. There are multiple reasons for this, including the cost of the testing for capture efficiency, and more flexibilityin meeting VOC coating content limits, monthly VOC limits and yeasly VOC limits. The permanent total enclosures installed at existing facilities have been determined to be a capture system approved by the Division. For facilities with permanent total enclosures, the 100% capture efficiency along with a 

### required 90% control efficiency indicate that Rule (mm) is more stringentthan the CTG even at a

### maximum 2006 CTG requirement of 80% overall control. However, permanent total enclosures are not required by the rule. Therefore, in order to meet the CTG, a . . controlefficiency Seventypercent (70%) overall control efficiency Seventy-fivepercent (75%) overall controlefficiency Eighty percent (80%) overall controlefficiency . . efi7ci&cy ind an approved capture system. unable to determine unable to determine unable to determine

### Georgia Group 

### I1 CTG SIP Revision requirement that the overall control efficiency must meet 

### 65%, 70%, 75%, or 80% is addedto the rule. As an alternativeto the control efficiencies discussed above, EPA recommends the use of low VOC content materials for a single press not to exceed 0.16 kilograms of VOC per kilogram ofmaterial appliedor 0.8 lcilograms ofVOC per ltilogram of solids applied. Table 2.3.3 

### compares the recommended solvent content for coatings fiom the 2006 federal CTG withthe existingemission standardsin GeorgiaRule (mm). Table 2.3.3 Comparison Of The2006 Federal CTG VOC Emission Standards for Flexible Package 

## I Printing with ~xktin~ Emission 2006 federal CTG 0.16

### 1~ ofVOC / ICEofcoating as 

# - applied(with water)

0.8 kg of VOC / kg of solids applied - tandards in Georgia Rule (mm).

Existing ~eorgia-mngent Limitation? 40 percent VOC by volume of the 

### ( Georgia Rule (mrn) coating or ink, minus water 

# I

25 percent VOC by volume ofthe volatilecontentofthe coating,

0.5 lbs of VOC / lb of coating solids applied 

### Appendix D contains the calculations used to convert the emission limits for low solvent coatings and inks into the same units of measurement. Georgia Rule (mm) was determined to be the more stringent emission limitation for the emission limit of 0.5 lbs of VOC per lb 

### of coating solids applied and for the emission limit of 25% VOC by volume of the volatile content ofthe coating. ComulianceMethods: Facilities subject to the updated Georgia Rule (mm) will be able to comply with the requirements of the rule by following the work practice standards spelled out in the rule. Those facilities with individual presses that have a potential to emit 25 tons per year or more will have the option ofmeeting a low VOC content coating or installingcontrol equipment with the required control efficiency. Although not spelled out in the rule, control equipment can be used to meet the content coating emission limits. Procedures for Testing and Monitoring: No changes areprescribed for PTM Sections 2.040 and 2.1 12. Conclusion: Georgia EPD adopted revisions to Georgia Rule (rnm) for the 20-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area on January 25,2012 with a compliance date of January 1,2015. Prior to January 1, 2015, facilities that perform packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing located in the original 13-county nonattainment

### Georgia GroupI1CTG SIPRevision

area whose potential VOC emissions from theses activities are greater than or equalto 25 tons per year will be subject to the original requirements of this rule. The original requirements will also apply for these types of facilities with potential VOC emissions greater than 100 tons per year that are located outside of the original 13-county nonattainment area. On or after January 1,2015,the rule will apply to flexiblepackaging facilities within the entire 20-county nonattainment area with actual VOC emissions equal to or greater than 15 pounds per day before controls. For individual presses with potential VOC emissions equal to or greater than 25 tons per year, the facility must meet additional control requirements for those presses. Individual presses with less than 25 tons per year of potential emissions must meet the requirements ofthe originalrule. In the case of facilities that perform packaging rotogravure, publicationrotogravure, and flexographicprinting on or after January 1,2015, a facility with potential VOC emissions that are equal to or greater than 25 tons per year within the 13-county nonattainment area but at which the actual emissions of VOCs from only flexible package printing, before controls, are less than 15pounds per day, must comply with the original requirementsin the rule. In the additional seven counties in the nonattainment area, facilities that perform packaging rotogravure, publicationrotogravure, and flexographic printing facilities with potential emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year but at which the actual emissions of VOCs from only flexible packaging are less than 15 pounds per day, must complywith the original requirements ofthe rule. See Table 2.3.1 for a concise description ofthe requirements on or after January 1,2015. However, because the metro Atlanta area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS without these rules in place, if the area is re-designated attainment before January 1, 2015, and those counties continue to maintain the standard, the revisions will no longer apply. In the eventthat the 1997 ozone standard is violated inthe specified nonattainment counties, the revised requirements will only be reinstated if they are determined to be a necessary measure to meet the requirements ofthe maintenancecontingency plan.

### Georgia Group 11 

### CTG SIP Revision


## 3:0 

## LITHOGRAPHIC 

# AND 

# LETTERPRESS PRINTING 3.1 Regulatory Background

# -Federal Lithographicprinting refers to a printing process where the image and non-image areas are chemicallydifferentiated; the image area is oil receptive and the non-image area is water receptive. This method differs from other printing methods, where the image is a raised or recessed surface. Offset lithographic printing refers to a printingprocess that transfers the ink film fromthe lithographicplate to an intermediary surface (blanket), which, in turn, transfers the ink film to the substrate. Letterpress printing means 

### a printing process in which the image area is raised relative to the nonimage area and the paste ink istransferred to the substrate directly from the image surface. There are many similaritiesbetween the offset lithographicprinting industry and the letterpressindustry including similar sourcesof VOC emissions and similar control options. As such, even though EPA has inthepast only addressed the offset lithographic industry through federal action, this 2006 CTG addressesboth categories. There have been two Federal actionsthat concernthe offset lithographic printingindustry prior to 2006. InNovember 1993,EPA issued a draR CTG document for offset iithographicprinting.5 Then, inJune 1994,after reviewing commentsreceived onthe draft CTG, EPA published an alternative control techniques document (ACT) on offset lithographic in order to supply supplemental informationtothk Statesfor rule development. 3.2 Regulatory Background

# - State GeorgiaEPD implemented Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(ddd) "VOC Emissions from Offset Lithography" [a.k.a. Georgia Rule (ddd)] to fulfill the VOC RACT requirements for the l-hour ozoneNAAQS. GeorgiaEPD alsoimplemented GeorgiaRule 391-3-1-.02(2)(tt) "VOC Emissions from Major Sources" [a.k.a. Georgia Rule 

### (tt)] for any major source ofVOCs not covered by another GeorgiaRule. This case-by-case RACT analysis, was implementedto fulfill the VOC RACTrequirements for the l-hour ozoneNAAQS. Any letterpress printing facility that is a major source ofVOC emissionsinthe nonattainment area would be subjectto GeorgiaRule (it). 

### 3.3 Does the Existing Georgia l-hour Ozone RACT fulfill the 8-hour Ozone RACT forthis Industry Sector? Applicability: Table 3.3.1 specifiesthe existingVOC emission applicabilitythresholds for this industry category.
'~uideline Sesies. Control of VolatileOrganic Emissions from OffsetLithographicPrinting,Draft. Publication No. EPA-453lD-95-001. U.S. EPA, September, 1993. 6~ltemative ControlTechniques Docnment: Offset Lithographic Printing. Publication No. EPA 453/R-94- 054. U.S.EPA, June, 1994.Table 3.3.1 VOC Em Atlanta Metro Area of Concern

Tote: 15lbsldavof actual em ion Applicability TI Georgia Rule (ddd) and Georgia Rule (tt) Applicability Threshold 

## voc @PY) PTE: 25 tpy from a facility

PTE: 100tpy from a facility

Ins before controlsis the esholds -Lithograp1 2006 CTG Recommended Emission Threshold
Actual: 15 lbslday before controls PTE: 25 tpy from an individualheatset web offset press

Actual: 15 lbslday before controls PTE: 25 tpy from an individualheatset web offset press and Letterpress Printing Revised Georgia Rule (ddd) Applicability Threshold VOC*
Actual: 15 lbslday before controls for fountain solution and work practice standards PTE: 25 tpy from an individual heatset web offset press for new press control measures and 25 tpy from all heatset web offset presses at a facility for existing controlmeasures Actual: 15 lbslday before controls PTE: 25 tpy from an individual heatset web offset press for new press control measures and 100 py from all heatset web offset xesses at a facility for existing :ontrol measures plicability threshold for the rule and results innfacilitybeing subject to trds, and fountain solution standards. At the higherpotential emission control options. 

### Applicability thresholds for lithographic printing and letterpress printing were not referenced in EPA's Blue Book. The 1993 CTG was not finalized; therefore, the VOC applicability thresholds for Georgia Rule (ddd) and Georgia Rule (tt) have varied depending on the attainment designation of the Atlanta area. Currently both are set at 25 tons per year in the original 13 

### one-hour ozone nonattainment counties because of the Atlanta area's status as a severe ozone nonattainment area for the previous 1-hour standard [Section 182@)(2)(C)]. When the nonattainment area was expanded for the 1997 8-hour standard, the applicabilitythreshold remained at 100tons per year for those additional seven counties that were previously attainment for the 1-hour standard. There are three lmown affected owners/operators subject to Georgia Rule (ddd), and there are no known letterpressprinting facilities. Emission Standards Lithograuhic and Letterpress Printing: 

### For facilitieswith actual emissions greater than 15pounds per day, EPA recommends that the facility implement 

# - - - - 

# - A 

### work practice standards for cleaning that include storing all VOC-containing cleaning materials and used shop towels in closed containers; ensuringthat storage containers used for these materials are kept closed at all times except when accessing the containers; minimizing spills of the VOC-containing cleaning materials; conveying these materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes; and minimizing VOC emissions from the cleaning processes associated with application, storage, mixing, and

### Georgia Group 

### I1 CTG 

### SIP Revision conveying equipment. This should be done by ensuring that equipment cleaning is performed without atomizing the cleaning solvent and all spent solvent is captured in closed containers. 

### EPA also recommends that these facilitiesuse cleaningmaterials with a VOC composite vapor pressure less that lOmm Hg at 20 degrees Celsius or cleaning materials containing less than seventy (70) weight percent VOC. For those cleaning tasks that cannot be accomplished with cleaning materials that meet these requirements, the facility can excludeup to one hundred and ten gallons per year. Additionally, the 2006 CTG recommends different emissionlimits for fountain solutions. These limits are compared to the emission limits specified in existing GeorgiaRule (ddd) inTable 3.3.2

### below: Table 3.3.2 Comparison Of The2006Federal CTGVOC Emission Standards for Fountain

Fountain Solution containing: Solution With

# xis st in^ Emission Standards In Georzia Rule (ddd).

8% or less VOCs by volume; Existing VOC Limit

(equivalentto 6.6% or alcohol by weight, 2006 CTGVOC Limit

6.8% or less alcohol an alcohol substituteby weight, or 7.26% or less alcohol substituteby weight). Fountain solution for: Heatset web offset lithographic printing 1.6% or less alcohol by weight; OR an equivalent solution of3%alcoholby weight or less (on press) andrefcigerated below 60 degreesF; OR 5%alcohol substitute or lessby weight (onpress) and no alcohol in fountain solution. Sheet-fed offset lithographic printing 5%or less alcohol by weight. OR an equivalent solutionof 8.5% alcoholby weight or less (on press) andrefcigeratedbelow 60 degreesF; OR 5% alcohol substituteor less by weight (onpress) and no alcohol in fountain solution. Coldset web offset lithographic printing 5% alcohol substitute or less by weight (onpress) and no alcohol in fountain solution. More Strineent Limitation 20.06 CTG

2006 CTG

LO06 CTG

### Georgia GroupI1 

### CTG 

### SIPRevision

For heatset web offset lithographic and heatset web letterpress printing presses with a potential to emit (PTE) before controls of 25 tons of VOC (petroleum ink oil) per year from the dlyer, EPA

### recommends an overall VOC control efficiency based on the year an add-on air pollution control device is initiallyinstalled. Cooling a fountain solution that contains isopropyl alcohol is a process modification that reduces VOC emissions by reducing the evaporation of the alcohol. The recommended level of control for VOC emissions from on-press (as-applied) fountain solution for sheet-fed printing is five percent alcohol (by weight) in the fountain or equivalent. One approach for achieving this recommended level of control involves using 8.5 percent alcohol or less (by weight) on-press (as-applied) in the fountain solution provided the fountain solutionisrefrigeratedto below 60°F (15.5 "C). Control equipment with an initial installation date prior to the compliance date of a rule based on the 2006 CTG is required to have a control efficiency of 90%. However, for control equipment with an initial installation date afterthe compliance date of anupdated rule, the CTG recommends a control efficiency of 95%. Alternatively, an outlet concentration reduced to 20 ppmv as hexane on a chy basis can be used for those situationswhere the inlet VOC concentrationislow orthere is no identifiableinlet. ComplianceMethods: Facilities subject to the updated Georgia Rule (ddd) will be able to comply with the requirements of the rule by following the work practice standards spelled out in the rule and by meeting the VOC limitations for cleaning materials and fountain solution. Those facilities with presses that have a potential to emit 25 tons per year or more will also be required to either meet the VOC content limits for coatings and inks or install control equipment with the required control efficiency. Although not spelled out in the rule, control equipment can be used to meet the content coating emission limits. Procedures for Testing and Monitorin% No changes are prescribed for PTM Sections 2.040 and 2.112. Conclusion: Georgia EPD adopted revisions to Rule Georgia Rule (ddd) for the 20- county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area on January 25,2012, with a compliance date of January 1,2015. prior to January 

### 1, 2015, offset lithographic printing facilities located in the original 

### 13- county nonattainment area whose potential VOC emissions from these activities are greater than or equal to 25 tons per year will be subject to the original requirements of this rule. The original requirements will also apply for these types of facilities with potential VOC emissions greater than 100 tons per year that are located in the seven additional nonattainmentcounties.

### Georgia Group I1CTG SIP Revision

Prior to January I, 2015, letterpress printing facilities are subject to the provisions of Georgia Rule (tt), a case-by-case RACT analysis. Beginning on or after January I, 2015, the rule revisions will apply to both offset lithographic and letterpress printing facilities within the entire 20-county nonattainrnent area with actual VOC en~issions equal to or greater than 15 pounds per day before controls. Individual heatset web offset and individual heatset web letterpress printing presses located in the original 13-county nonattainment area with potential VOC emissions equal to or greater than 25 tons per year must meet additional control requirements for those presses while those with less than 25 tons per year of potential emissionsmust meet the requirementsofthe originalrule. The original rule also continues to apply to individual heatset web offset lithographic printing presses with less than 25 tons per year of potential emissions from the individual press at a facility whose overall potential emissions are equal to or greater than 100 tons per year inthe seven additional nonattainment counties. However, because the metro Atlanta area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS without these rules in place, if the area is re-designated attainment before January 1, 2015, and those counties continue to maintain the standard, the revisions will no longer apply. In the event that the 1997 ozone standard is violated inthe specified nonattainment counties, the revised requirements will only be reinstated if they are determined to be a 

### necessary measureto meet the requirements of the maintenance contingency plan.

### Georgia GroupI1CTG SIP Revision


## 4.0 

## INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SOLVENTS 4.1 Regulatory Background

# - Federal Industrial cleaning solvents refersto a variety ofproducts that areused to remove contaminants such as adhesives, inks, paint, dirt, soil, oil, and grease. These contaminants areremoved from production related equipmentincluding parts, products, tools, machinery, equipment, vessels, floors and walls. Other work production areas may be cleaned for a variety ofreasons including, safety, operational effectiveness, and to removeproduct contamination. Many industrial solvents arepurchased in bulk and used for other purposes such aspaint thinner. There is only one previous federal actionthat conceins industrial cleaning operations. In 1994,EPA issued an Alternative Control Techniques (1994 ACT) document for industrialcleaning solvents. 4.2 Regulatory Background

# - State GeorgiaEPD implemented GeorgiaRule 391-3-1-.02(2)(tt) "VOC ~missionsfiom Major Sources" [aka.Georgia Rule (tt)] to fidfillthe VOC RACT requirements for the 1-hour ozoneNAAQS. Georgia Rule (tt), a case-by-case RACT analysis, was implementedfor any major source ofVOCs not coveredby another GeorgiaRule. With the development ofthe 2006 CTG, more specificrequirements for facilities that use industrialcleaning solvents are available; therefore, Georgia EPD has developed a new state rule category. This newrule is Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(aaaa) or Georgia Rule (aaaa). 4.3 Does the Existing Georgia 1-hour Ozone

### RACT fulfill the 8-hour Ozone 

### RACT for this Industry Sector? A~plicability: Tables4.3.1 specifies the existing VOC emission applicabilitythresholds for industriescovered under this CTG:

The applicability threshold for Georgia Rule (tt) has varied depending onthe attainment designation of the Atlanta area. Currentlyit is set at 25 tons per year inthe original 

### 13 nonattainment countiesbecause of the Atlanta area's status as a severe ozone nonattainment area for the previous 1-hour standard [Section 182(b)(2)(C)]. When the nonattainment area was expanded for the 1997 8-hour standard with a marginal designation, the applicabilitythreshold remained at 100 tons per year for those additional Table 4.3.1 VOC Emission ApplicabilityThresholds

### -Industrial Cleaning Solvents Atlanta Metro Area of Concern 13-County 7-County Georgia Rule (tt) Applicability Threshold VOC (tPY) PTE: 25 PTE: 100 2006 CTG Recommended Emission Threshold 

### Actual: 15 Ibslday Actual: 15 lbslday New Georgia Rule (aaaa) Applicability Threshold VOC Actual: 15 lbslday Actual: 15 lbslday

### Georgia Group I1 

### CTG SIPRevision

sevencounties that were previously attainment for the 1-hourstandard. There are no known affected owners/operatorssubjectto the new Georgia Rule (aaaa) for industrial cleaning solvents. Someindustries with solvent cleaning operationsmay already be covered under an existing rule based on a current CTG with control approaches that are more specific to that particular industry. Because ofthis, the 2006 CTG recommends that these industries should be considered exempt. Emission Standards:

### The 2006 CTG recommends work practice standards for cleaning operations that include covering open containers andused applicators; minimizing air circulationaround cleaning operations; properly disposing ofused solvent and shop towels; and implementing equipment practices that minimizeemissions (e.g., keeping parts cleaners covered, maintaining cleaningequipmentto repair solvent leaks, etc.). In additionto work practice standards for cleaningprocesses, the 2006 CTG recommends a VOC content limit offifty grams ofVOC per liter (0.42 Iblgal) for cleaning materials used in certain cleaning operationsunless en~issions are controlledby an emission control system with an overall control efficiency of eighty-five percent. These specificunit operationsinclude spray gun cleaning, spray booth cleaning, largemanufactured components cleaning, parts cleaning, equipment cleaning, line cleaning, floor cleaning, tank cleaning, and small manufactured components cleaning. Alternatively, EPA recommendsthe inclusion of a composite vapor pressure limit of eightmillimeters ofmercury (8 

### mmHg) 

### at twenty degrees Celsius, as a replacement for the 50gll VOC content limit. Compliance Methods: 

### Facilities subject to the new Georgia Rule (aaaa) will be able to comply with the requirements of the rule by following the work practice standards spelled out in the iule and by meeting the VOC limitatiohs for cleaning materials. Facilities will have the option ofmeeting a composite vapor pressure limit or installing a control system with eighty-five percent control efficiency rather than meeting the VOC content limit for the cleaning materials. Proceduresfor Testing and Monitoring: 

### GeorgiaEPD's PTM has been updated by addingnew section 2.127 for this federal CTG. Conclusion: 

### EPD has adoptedthe new GeorgiaRule (aaaa) for the 20-county Atlanta ozonenonattainment area on January 25,2012, with a compliance date ofJanuary 1, 2015. Beginningon or after January 1,2015,the rule will apply to facilitieslocated in 20- countynonattaiiunent area at which actual emissions of volatile organic compounds from the use of organic solvents for cleaningoperations equal or exceed 15pounds per day. However, because the metro Atlanta area has attained the 1997ozoneNAAQS without this rule inplace, ifthe area isre-designated attainment before January 1,2015, and these counties continueto maintain the standard,the new rule will no longer apply. In the

### Georgia Group 

### I1 CTG SIP

### Revision
eventthat the 

### 1997ozone standardisviolated inthe specified nonattainment counties, the requirements will only be reinstated if they are determinedto be a necessary measure to meet therequirements of the maintenance contingencyplan.

### Georgia Group I1 

### CTG SIPRevision 

## 5.0 

## FLAT 

# WOOD PANELING 5.1 

### Regulatoly Background

# - Federal Flat wood paneling productsreferto decosative interiorpanels, exterior siding, and tileboard used in construction. Decorative interior panels areusually grooved, frequently embossed, and sometimes grain printed to resemblevarious wood species. The substrate canbe hardboard, plywood, medium densityfiberboard 

### (MDF), or particleboard. Exterior siding may be made of solid wood, hardboard, or waferboard. Sidingmade of solid wood and hardboard is typically primed at the manufacturingfacility and finishedin the field, although some finishingmay be performed during manufacturing on a limited basis. Field-applied coatings are not subjectto this CTG. Tileboard is apremiuminterior wall panelingproduct made ofhardboardthat isused inhigh moisture areas of the home such as kitchens and bathrooms. There have been two Federal actions that apply to flat wood paneling prior to 2006. In June 1978, EPA issued a final CTG document (1978 CTG) for flat wood paneling coatings.7 In May of 2003, EPA promulgated a national emission standard covering the surface coating of wood building products including flat wood paneling, 40 

### CFR Part 63 

### Subpart QQQQ 

### -National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 

### for thePrinfingandPublishing Industry. 5.2 Regulatory Background 

# - State Georgia EPD implemented Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(jj) "VOC Emissions from Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling" [a.k.a. Georgia Rule 

# (i)] to fulfill the VOC RACT requirements for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. 5.3 

### Does the Existing Georgia 1-hour Ozone RACT fulfill the 8-hour Ozone RACT 

### for thisIndustry Sector? Auvlicabilitv: Tables 5.3.1 specifies the existingVOC emission applicabilitythresholds for industries covered under this CTG: 

## I Metro 

## 1 Applicability 

## 1 Recommended 

## I Recommendations 

## I I Area of 

## I Threshold 

# I Emission 

## I 1

Concern VOC (tpy) Threshold" 13-County Actual: 15 Actual: 15lbsiday PTE: 10tpy lbslday before controls Actual: 15lbslday 7-County PTE: 100 Actual: 15Ibslday PTE: 10tpy' before controls Actual: 15Ibslday Revised Georgia Rule (jj) Applicability Threshold Actual: 15lbsIdaybefore controls
controls

'Guideline Series. Control of Volatile Organic EmissionsfromExisting Stationary Sources -Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating ofFlat Wood Paneling. PublicationNo. EPA-45012-78-032. US.EPA, June 1978. 

### 16

### Georgia Group I1 

### CTG 

### SIPRevision The 1978 

### CTG does not recommend an applicabilitythreshold, however in EPA's Blue Book, flat wood paneling was listedas a source categoly forthe recommended exemption level of 15lbs per day of actual emissions.

, 

### There are no linown affected ownersloperators subject to the Georgia Rule (ii) 

### for the surface coating of flatwood paneling inthe nonattainment area. Emission Standards: The 2006 CTG recommends that all flat wood paneling facilities will need to implement a work practice plan to ensure that VOC emissions from manufacturing processes are minimized. These work practice standards should include storing all VOC-containing materials in closed containers, ensuring that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containing materials are kept closed at all times except when depositing or removing these materials, minimizing spills of VOC-containing materials; and conveying VOC-containing materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes. The 2006 CTG also recommends low-VOC materials for inks, coatings and adhesives in weight per volume of coating (lbslgal or g/l)

### with an equivalent emission limit, expressed in weight per volume of solids (lbslgallon of solids or gll of solids). Alternatively, the 2006 CTG recommends the option of add-on control equipment to meet an overall control efficiency of ninety percent. Table 5.3.2 

### compares the emission standardsin the 2006 Federal CTG for flat wood paneling with those in existing Georgia

Table 5.3.2 Comparison Of The2006 Federal CTG VOCEmission Standardsfor FlatWood Paneling with 

### xis sting E Flat Wood Paneling Category Printed interior panels made ofhardwood plywood, orthin particleboard Natural fmishhardwood plywood panels
Class I1 finishes on hardboard panels
Tileboard*
Exterior siding

We: Emission limits fortileboan ssion Standardsin Georgia 2006 Federal CTG
2.1 lbs VOC per gallon, or 2.9 lbs VOC per gallon of solids 2.1 lbs VOC per gallon, or 2.9 lbs VOC per gallon of solids 2.1 lbs VOCper gallon, or 2.9 lbsVOC per gallon of solids 2.1 lbs VOC per gallon, or 2.9 lbs VOCper gallon of solids 2.1 Ibs VOC per gallon, 3r 2.9 lbsVOC per gallon of iolids ~d

exterior sidingwere not recomme :ule Cij) Existing Georgia Rule 

### Uj)
6 lbs VOC11000square ft (equivalentto 2.5 Ibslgallonsasper the CTG) 12lbs VOC/IOOOsquare 

### fi (equivalentto 3.3 Ibslgallonsas per the CTG) 10lbs VOC/lOOOsquare ft (equivalentto 3.6 Ibslgallons asper the CTG) No previous existing limit.

Noprevious existing limit.

:din the 1978CTG. More Stringent Limitation? 2006 CTG

2006 CTG

2006 CTG

2006 CTG

2006 CTG

### Georgia Group I1 CTG SIPRevision
Compliance Methods: Facilities subjectto the updated Georgia Rule (ii)

### will be able to comply 

### with the requirements of the ruleby following the work practice standards spelled out in the rule and by meeting the VOC limitations for cleaning materials. Facilities will have the option of meeting a solids equivalent limit or installing a control system with ninety percent control efficiencyin order to meet the coating limits. Procedures for Testing and Monitoring: GeorgiaEPD's PTM has been updated by addingnew Section 2.129 for this federal CTG. Conclusion: GeorgiaEPD adopted revisionsto GeorgiaRule (jj) 

### for the 20-county Atlanta ozonenonattaimnentarea on January 25,2012, with a compliance date of January 1,2015. Prior to January 1,2015, flat wood paneling facilitieslocated inthe original 13-county nonattainment area whose potential VOC emissions from these activitiesare greater than or equal to 15pounds per day will be subjectto the original requirements ofthis rule. The original requirements will also apply for these types of facilities with potential VOC emissions greater than 100tons per year that are located in the seven additional nonattainment counties. Beginning on or after January 1,2015,the rule revisions instead, will applyto flat wood paneling facilitieswithin the entire 20-county nonattainment area with actual VOC emissions equalto or greaterthan 15 pounds per day before controls. The current limitations will continue to apply to facilities in counties outside of the 20-county nonattainment areato facilities withpotential VOC emissions greater than 100 tons per year. However, because the metro Atlanta area has attainedthe 1997 ozoneNAAQS without these rules inplace, ifthe area isre-designated attainmentbefore January 1,2015, and those counties continueto maintain the standard,the revisions will no longer apply. In the event that the 1997ozone standard isviolated in the soecifiednonattainment counties. the revised requirements will onlybe reinstated ifthey are determined to be a necessary measure to meet the requirements ofthe maintenancecontingency plan.

### APPENDIX A 

### RULE LANGUAGEChapter 391-3-1 Rulesfor Air Quality Control
PROPOSEDAMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION RELATINGTO AIR QUALITY, CHAPTER 391-3-1


### The Rules of the Department of Natural Resources, Chapter 391-3-1, Air Quality Control are hereby amended, added to, 

### repealed in part, revised, as hereinafter explicitly set forth inthe attached amendments, additions, partial repeals, and revisions for specific rules, or such subdivisions thereof as may be indicated. [Note: Underlined text is proposed to be added. Lined-through text is proposed for deletion.]
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(jj) "VOC Emissions from Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling," 

### is being amendedto read as follows: (jj) VOC Emissions from Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling. 

### 1. No person shall cause, let, permit, suffer, or allow the emissions of VOC from surface coating of flat wood paneling to exceed: (i) 6.0 pounds per 1000 square feet of coated finished product from printed interior panels, regardless of the number of coats applied; (ii) 12.0 pounds per 1000 square feet of coated finished productfrom natural finish hardwood plywood panels, regardless of the number of coats applied; and (iii) 10.0 pounds per 1000 squarefeet of coated finished product from Class 

### II finishes on hardboard panels, regardless of the number of coats applied. 2. The emission limits inthis stka3bwsubparagraph shall be achieved by: (i) the application of low solvent coating technology where the 24-hour of all coatings on a single coating line or operation meets the limits stated in¶graph 

### 1. of this

### sth&h subparagraph; averaging across lines is not allowed; or (ii) control equipment, including but not limited to incineration, carbon adsorption and condensation, with a capture system approved by the Director, providedthat 90 percent of the nonmethane volatile organic compounds which enter the control equipment are recovered or destroyed, and that overallVOC emissions do not exceed the limits stated in subparagraph 1. of this stk&bwsubparagraph. (iii) control equipment demonstrated to have control efficiency equivalent to or greater or VOC emissions equal to or less than required in li) or (ii) of this ¶graph and approved by the Director. Page 1

### of 15 

### November6,2011Chapter 391-3-1 Rulesfor 

### Air Quality Control

3. No person shall cause, let, permit, suffer, or allow the emissions of VOC from the inks, coatings, and adhesives used by flat wood panelinq coatinq facilities to exceed: li) 2.1 lbs VOC per qallon (250 Grams per liter) of coating, excluding water, and exempt compounds, or lii) 2.9 lbs VOC per gallon (350 grams per liter) of solids. 

### 4. Averaging across lines for the VOC limits in subparagraph 3. is not permitted. 5. Should product performance requirements or other needs dictate the use of hiqher VOC coatings, than those specified in subparagraph 3.; add-on control equipment with an overall control efficiency of 90% may be used as an alternative. 6. Each owner or operator of a facility that manufacturesflat wood panelinq shall comply with the following work practice standards: (i) store all VOC-containing materials in closed containers; (ii) ensure that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containinqmaterials are kept closed at all times except when depositing or removingthese materials; (iii) minimize spills of VOC-containing materials: and Page2 of 15 November 6,2011Chapter 

### 391-3-1 Rules for 

### Air Quality Control (iv) convey VOC-containina materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes. 

### 7. For the purpose of this sub~aragraph, the following definitions also apply: (i) "Class 

### 11 hardboard paneling finish" meansfinisheswhich meet the specifications of Voluntary Product Standard PS-59-73 as approved by the American National Standards Institute. {ii) "Coatina applicationsystem" means all operations and equipment which applv, convev, and dry a surface coating, includinq, but not limitedto, spray booths, flow coaters, conveyers, flashoff areas, air dryers and ovens.

... (111) "Flat wood panelina" means both interior and exterior panels used in construction and typically include decorative interior panels, exterior sidina and tileboard. Flat wood panelinq includes hardboard, hardwood plywood, natural finish hardwood plywood panels, printed interior panels, thin particleboard and tileboard. liv) "Hardboard is a panel manufacturedprimarily from interfelted liqnocellulosic fibers which are consolidated under heat and pressure in a hot press. (v) "Hardwood plywood is plvwoodwhose surface layer is a veneer. [vi) "Naturalfinish hardwood plywood panels" means panelswhose oriqinal grain pattern is enhanced bv essentiallytransparent finishes frequently supplemented by fillers and toners. (vii) "Thin particleboard is a manufactured board 114 inch or less in thickness made of individualwood particles which have been coatedwith a binder and formed into flat sheets by pressure. (viii) "Tileboard means panelingthat has a colored waterproof surface coatinq. (ix) "Printed interior panels" means panelswhose grain or natural surface is obscured by fillers and basecoats upon which a simulated grain or decorative pattern is printed. 8. Applicability. Prior to January 1. 2015, the requirements of this subparaaraph (ii) shall apply to facilities at which the actual emissions of volatile orqanic compounds from the slirface coating of flat wood paneling equal or exceed 15 pounds per day and are located in Cherokee. Clayton, Cobb, Coweta. DeKalb. Douglas. Favette, Forsvth. Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry. Pauldina, and Rockdale Counties as follows: li) All applicable facilities shall comply with the provisions of subparaqraphs I., 2.. and 

### 7. 9. Applicability. Prior to January 1. 2015, the requirements of this subparaqraph (ji) shall apply to facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile organic compounds from the surface coatinq of flat wood paneling equal or exceed 100 tons per year and are located outside the counties of Cherokee. Clayton, Cobb, Coweta. DeKalb. Douqlas. Fayette, Forsvth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry. Pauldinq, and Rockdale Counties as follows: Page 3 of 15 November6,2011Chapter 391-3-1 Rules for Air Quality Control (i) All applicablefacilities shall comply with the provisions of subparagraphs 1., 2., and 

### 7. 10. Applicability. On and after Januarv 1. 2015, the requirements of this subparagraph (ii) shall apply to facilities at which actual emissions of volatile organic compounds from the surface coating of flat wood paneling, before controls, equal or exceed 15 pounds per day (or 2.7 tons per 12-month rolling period) for facilities located in Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clavton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette. Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton Counties as follows: (i) All applicablefacilities shall comply with the provisions of subparagraphs 3.. 

### 4,5.. 

### 6.,and 

### 7. (ii) Any physical or operational changes that are necessary to comply with the provisions specified in s~ibparaqraphs 3.. 4., 5.. or 6.are subject to the compliance schedule specified in subparaqraph 13. 11. Applicability. On and after January 

### 1, 2015, the requirementsof this subparagraph (ii) shall apply to facilities at which potential emissions of volatile organic compounds from the surface coatina of flat wood paneling equal or exceed 100 tons per year and are located outside of counties of Barrow. Bartow. Carroll. Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb. Coweta. DeKalb. Douqlas, Favette. Forsvth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall. Henry, Newton, Paulding. Rockdale, Spaldina, and Walton Counties as follows: (i) All applicable facilities shall comply with the provisions of subparagraphs I., 2.. and 

### 7. 12. Applicabilitv. The reauirements of subparaqraphs 10. and 11.will no lonaer be applicable by the compliance deadlines if the counties specified in those subparagraphs are re-desiqnated to attainment for the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone prior to January 1, 2015 and such counties continue to maintain that Standardthereafter. Instead, the provisions of subparaaraphs 8. and 

### 9. will continueto apply on and after Januarv 

### I, 2015. Inthe event the 1997 NationalAmbient Air Qualitv Standard for ozone is violated inthe specified counties, the requirements of subparaqraphs 10. and 11. will onlv be reinstated if the Director determines that the measure is necessary to meet the reauirementsof the contingency plan. 13. Compliance Schedule: (i) An application for a permit to construct and operate volatile organic compound emission control systems andlor modifications of process andlor coatinqs used must be submittedto the Division no later than Julv 1, 2014. (ii) On-site of construction of emission control systems andlor modification of process or coatinqs must be completed by November 1, 2014. (iii) Full compliance with the applicable re~uirements specified in subparagraph 10.(i) must be completed before Januarv 1, 2015.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(mm) "VOC Emissions from Graphic Arts Systems," is being amended to read as follows: Page4 of 15 November 6,201 1Chapter 

### 391-3-1 Rules for Air Quality Control (mm) VOC Emissions from Graphic Arts Systems., 

### 1. No person shall cause, let, permit, suffer, or allow the operation of a packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure or flexographic printing facility unless: (i) For packaging rotogravure and flexographic printing, the VOC content ofany ink or coating as applied is equalto or less than one of the following: (1) 25 percent by volume of the volatile content of the coating or ink; or (11) 40 percent byvolume of the coating or ink, minuswater; or (Ill) 0.5 pounds of VOC per pound of coating solids. (ii) For publication rotogravure printing,the VOC content of any ink or coating as applied is equal to or less than one of the following: (1) 25 percent by volume of the volatile content of the coating or ink; or (11) 40 percent by volume of the coating or ink, minuswater. 2. 

### As an alternativeto compliance with the limits insubparagraph 

### I., an owner or operator of a packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure or flexographic printing facility may comply with the requirements of this subparagraph

### e&se&w by: (i) Averaging on a 24-hour weighted basis the VOC content of all inks and coatings, as applied, on a single printing line, where the average does not exceed the limits in subparagraph 

### 1.; averaging across lines is not allowed; or (ii) Installing and operating volatile organic compound emission reduction equipment having at least 90.0 percent reduction efficiency, and a capture system approved by the Director.



### ekek Page5 of 15 

### November 6,201 1Chapter 

### 391-3-1 Rulesfor Air Quality Control

3. If, as an alternative to compliance with the limits in subparagraph l.(i), volatile orqanic compound emission reduction equipment is installed and operated at a flexible packaging plintina facility to comply with subparagraph 2.(ii) it shall have an overall VOC control efficiency that is equal to or areater than the percentaae specified in the following subparagraphs (i) throuqh (iv). (i) 65 percent for a press that was first installed prior to March 14. 1995, and that is controlled by an add-on air pollution control device whose first installationdate was priorto February 19, 

### 2012; lii) 70 percent for a press that was first installed prior to March 14, 1995, and that is controlled bv an add-on air pollution control device whose first installationdate was on or after February {iii) 75 percent for a press that was first installed on or after to March 14, 1995, and that is controlled bv an add-on air pollution control device whose first installationdate was prior to Februarv 

### 19, 2012: and (iv) 

### 80 percent for a press that was first installed on or after March 14, 1995, and that is controlled by an add-on air pollution control device whose first installationdate was on or after Februarv 19,2012.

4. Each owner or operator of a facilitv that prints flexible packaqinq shall comdv with the following housekeeping requirements for any affected cleaninq operation: li)store all VOC-containing cleaning materials and used shop towels in closed containers; (ii) ensure that storaae containers used for VOC-containinq cleaning materials are kept closed at all times except when depositing or removina these materials; (iii) minimize spills of VOC-containina cleaning materials; (iv) convey VOC-containing cleaning materialsfrom one location to another in closed containers or pipes; and (v) minimize VOC emissions from cleaninq of application, stora~e, mixing, and conveying equipment by ensurinq that equipment cleaninq is performedwithout atomizing the cleaning solvent and all spent solvent is captured in closed containers.

Page 6 of 15 November 6,2011Chapter 

### 391-3-1 Rulesfor Air Quality Control
5. For the purpose of this subparagraph, the following definitions shall apply: li) "Cleaning" for flexible packa~in~ printing means cleaning of a press, press parts, or removing dried ink from areas around a press. It do-es not include cleaninq electronic components of a press, cleanina in-pressor post-pressoperations or the use of ianitorial supplies to clean areas around a press. lii) "Flexible packaqina printinq" refers to printing upon any packaqe or part of a packagethe shape of which can be readilv changed. Flexible packaqing includes, but is not limitedto. baqs, pouches, liners, and wraps utilizinq paper, plastic,film, aluminum foil, metalizedor coated paper or film, or any combination of these materials. (iii) "Flexographic printing" means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printinq technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other elastomeric materials. (iv) "Packaging rotogravure printing" means rotogravure printing upon paper, paperboard. metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are in subsequent operations, formed into packaqina products and labels for articles to be sold. (v) "Publication rotoqravure printing" means rotoqravure printina upon paper which is subsequentlv formed into books, magazines, cataloaues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, and other types of printed materials. {vi) "Rotogravure printing" means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate bv means of a roll printing techniquewhich involves intaglio or recessed image areas inthe form of cells. ivii) "Roll printina" means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate usually bv means of a series of hard rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coveraae. 6. Applicabilitv. Prior to January 1. 2015, the requirements of this subparaqraph (mm) shall apply to facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile oraanic compounds from packaqing rotoqravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing equal or exceed 

### 25 tons per year and are located in Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douqlas. Favette. Forsvth, Fulton. Gwinnett, Henrv. Pauldinq, and Rockdale Counties as follows: (i) All applicablefacilities shall comply with the provisions of subparaaraphs 

### 1.. 2.. and 5. 

### 7. Applicability. Prioito Januarv 1, 2015, the requirements of this subparaqraph (mm) shall apply to facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile orqanic compounds from packaqing rotoqravure, publication rotogravure, and flexoqraphic printinq equal or exceed 100 tons per year and are located outside the counties of Cherokee. Clayton, Cobb. Coweta. DeKalb. Douqlas. Fayette. Forsyth. Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Pauldinq, and Rockdale Counties as follows: (i) All applicablefacilities shall comply with the provisions of subparagraphs 

### I., 2.. and 

### 5. Page 7 of 15 November 6,201 1Chapter 

### 391-3-1 Rules for Air Quality Control 8. Applicability. On and after January 

### 1,2015, the requirements of this subparaqraph (mm) shall apply to facilities at which actual emissions of volatile organic compounds from flexible package printinq, before controls, equal or exceed 15 pounds per day (or 2.7 tons per 12-month rolling period)for facilities located in Barrow, Bartow. Carroll. Cherokee, Clavton. Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb. Douqlas. Fayette. Forsvth. Fulton, Gwinnett. Hall, Henry, Newton. Paulding. Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton Counties as follows: 

### i Individual pressesthat have potential emissions of volatile oraanic compounds from flexible package printinq that equal or exceed 25 tons per vear shall comply with the provisions of subparagraphs l.(i). 

### 2, and 3. lii) Individual presses that have potential emissions of volatile orqanic compounds from flexible package printinqthat do not equal or exceed 25 tons per year shall comply with the provisions of subparaqraphs l.(i) and 2. liii) All applicable facilities shall comply with the provisions of subparaqraphs 

### 4., 5.. and 14. (iv) Anv physical or operational changes that are necessarvto comply with the provisions specified in subparaqraph84)or (iii) are subject to the com~liance schedule specified in subparagraph 13. 9. Applicability. On and after Januarv 1. 2015, the requirementsof this subparagraph (mm) shall apply to facilities at which potential emissions of volatile oraanic compounds from packaging rotoqravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printinq e~uals or exceeds 25 tons per year but at which the actual emissions of volatile oraanic compounds from flexible packaae printing, before controls, is less than 15 pounds per dav (or 2.7 tons per 12-month rollina period) and are located in Cherokee. Clavton, Cobb, Coweta. DeKalb, Douqlas. Favette, Forsvth, Fulton. Gwinnett, Henry. Paulding, and Rockdale Counties as follows: li) All applicable facilities shall complv with the provisions of subparagraphs 1.. 

### 2., and 5. 10. Applicabilitv. On and after January 1 2015. the requirementsof this subparaqraph (mm) shall apply to facilities at which potential emissions of volatile orqanic compounds from packaging rotoaravure, publication rotogravure, and flexoaraphic printinq equal or exceeds 100 tons per year but at which the actual emissions of volatile oraanic compounds from flexible package printinq, before controls, is less than 15 pounds per day (or 2.7 tons per 12-month rolling period) and are located Barrow, Bartow. Carroll. Hall, Newton. Spaldina, and Walton Counties as follows: li) All applicable facilities shall comply with the provisions of subparagraphs 1.. 2., and 5. 11. Applicability. On and after January 1, 2015, the requirementsof this subparagraph (mm)

-- shall applv to facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile organic compounds from packaging rotoqravure, publication rotoqravure, and flexible package printing equal or exceed 100 tons per year and are located outside of counties of Barrow. Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton. Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douqlas. Favette. Forsvth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry. Newton. Pauldinq, Rockdale. Spaldina, and Walton Counties as follows: 

## 0) All applicable facilities shall complv with the provisions of subparagraphs 

### 1.. 2.. and 

### 5. Page 8 of 15 November 6,201 1

### Chapter 391-3-1 

### Rulesfor Air Quality Control
12. Applicability: The requirements of subparaaraphs 8., 9.,, 

## lo., and 11.will no longer be applicable bv the compliance deadlines if the counties specified in those subparagraphs are redesignated to attainment for the 1997 NationalAmbient Air Quality Standard for ozone priorto January 1. 2015 and such counties continue to maintain that Standard thereafter. Instead, the provisions of subparagraphs 6. 

### and 7. 

### will continue to apply on and after Januarv 1, 2015. In the event the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standardfor ozone is violated in the specified counties, the requirements of subparaaraphs 8.. 

### 9., lo., and 11. will only be reinstated if the Director determines that the measure is necessaryto meet the requirements of the contingency 

## Dlan. 13. Compliance schedule: li) An application for a permitto construct and operate volatile oraanic compound emission control systems and/or modifications of process andlor coatings used must be submittedto the Division no laterthan July 1, 2014. (ii) On-site of construction of emission control systems andlor modification of process or coatinas must be completed by November 

### 1,2014. (iii) Full compliance with the applicable requirements specified in subparagraph84)and (iii) must be completed before Januarv 1, 2015. 

### 14. Compliance determinations for inks shalltreat volatile compounds not definedas VOCs as water for the purposes of calculatinq the "percent-by-volume-or-more of water" and the "less water" parts of the ink composition.
Rule 391-3-I-.02(2)(ddd) 

### "VOC Emissions from Offset Lithography," is being amended by changingthe name of the rule to "VOC Emissionsfrom Offset Lithography and Letterpress" and revising itto read as follows: (ddd) 

### VOC Emissions from Offset Lithography and Letterpress. 1. No person shall cause, let, permit, suffer, or allow the operation of any offset lithography printing facility unless: (i) Offset presses utilize fountain solutions containing 8 

### percent or less by volume VOCs; and (ii) The owner or operator installs and operates a VOC emission reduction system for all heatset offset printing operations approved by the Directorto have at least a 90 percent reduction efficiency and a capture system approved by the Director, or an equivalent VOC emission rate. 2. 

### No person shall cause, let, permit, suffer, or allow the operation of any sheet-fed offset lithographv printing facility unless the VOC content of the on-press (as-applied) fountain solution is: 

### - (i) 5.0 percent alcohol or less (by weight); or Page 9 

### of 15 November6,201

### 1Chapter 391-3-1 Rulesfor Air Quality Control (ii) 8.5 percent alcohol or less (bv weight) and the fountain solution is refrigerated to below 

### 60°F 

### (15.5 OC); or (iii) 5 percent alcohol substitute or less (bv weiaht) and no alcohol in the fountain solution.

3. Sheet-fed offset lithoaraphv presseswith a sheet size of 

### 1 Iinches bv 

### 17 inches or smaller, and presseswith a total fountain solution reservoir of less than 

### 1gallon are exempt.



### 4. No person shall cause, let, permit, suffer or allow the operation of anv cold-setweb-fed offset lithographv printinqfacility unless the 

### VOC content of the on-press (as applied) fountain solution is 5 percent alcohol substitute or less (bv weight) and no alcohol inthe fountain solution.

Page 10 of 15 November 6,201 1Chapter 391-3-1 Rules for 

### Air Quality Control

5. No personshall cause, let, permit, suffer, or allow the operation of any heatsetweb-fed offset lithography printing facility unless the VOC content of the on-press (as-applied) fountain solutions is: 

### li) 1.6 percent alcohol or less (byweiaht); or. lii) 3.0 percent alcohol or less (by weight) and the fountain solution is refrigerated to below 60°F 115.5°C); or (iii) 5.0 percent alcohol substitute or less (by weight) and no alcohol in the fountain solution. 6. For heatset web-fed offset lithoqraphic and letterpress printina presses, the owner or operator shall install and operate a VOC emission reduction svstem for all dryers with a potential to emit greater than or equal to 25 tons of VOC emissions per year prior to controls. li) Control devices with an initial installationdate on or before Januarv 

### 1. 2015, shall be approved bv the Director to have at least a 90 percent reduction efficiencv and a capture system approved by the Director. lii) Control devices with an initial installationdate after Januarv 1. 2015, shall be approved by the Director to have at least a 95 percent reduction efficiencv and a capture system approved bv the Director. 

### (iii) For situations where the inlet concentration is so low that 90 or 95 percent efficiencv cannot be achieved, an outlet concentration of 20 ppmv as hexane on a drv basis may be used as an alternative. (iv) Heatset presses used for book printing and heatset presses with a maximumweb width of 22 inches or less are exempt from the requirements in of subparaqraph6.(i) through (iii). lv) The following materials are exempt from the requirements of subparaqraph 64)through Mi): 11) sheet-fed or coldset web-fed inks; Ill) sheet-fed or coldset web-fed varnishes; and (Ill) waterborne coatings or radiation (ultra-violet light or electron beam) cured materials used on offset lithographic or letterpress presses. 7. 

### All cleaners usedfor blanket washing, roller washing, plate cleaners, impressioncylinder cleaners, rubber reiuvenators and other cleaners used for cleaning a press, press parts, or to remove dried inkfrom areas around a press shall have a VOC compositevapor pressure less than 10 mm Ha at 20°Celsius or contain less than 70 weight percent VOC. For those tasks that cannot b'carriedz~t with low VOC composite vapor pressure cleaning materrals or reduced VOC content cleaning matenals. 110 gal,ons per year of cleanincl materials that do not meet the requirements of this subsection may be used. Page 11of 15 November6,2011

### Chapter 391-3-1 RulesforAir Quality Control
8. All cleaninq materials and used shop towels are to be kept in closed containers. 9. For the purpose of this subsection, the following definitions shall applv: li) "Cleaning Materials" means the materials used to remove excess printing inks, oils, and residual paper from press equipment. These materials are tvpicallv mixtures of Ganic(oftenpetroleum-based) solvents. (ii) "Fountain Solution" means the mixture of water and additional ingredients such as etchant, gum arabic and dampening aid which coats the non-imaqe areas of the printinq plate. (iii) "Letterpress printinqLmeans a printing process in which the iniaqe area is raised relative to the non-image area and the past ink istransferred to the substrate directlv from the image surface. (iv) "Lithographic printing" means a printinq processwhere the imaqe and the non-image areas are chemically differentiated: the image area is oil receptive and non-image area iswater receptive. (v) "Offset lithoqraphy printing" means a printinq processthat transfers the ink film from the lithoqraphic plate to an intermediarv surface (blanket) which then transfersthe ink film to the substrate. (vi) "Sheet-fed" refers to the process in which the substrate iscut into sheets before beinq printed. {vii) "Web-fed" refers to the process inwhich the substrate is supplied to the press inthe form
10. Applicabil:tv. Prior to January 1, 2015, the requirements of this subparaqraph (ddd) shall applv to facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile organic compounds from offset lithographv printinq equal or exceed 25 tons per year and are located in Cherokee, Clayton. Cobb. Coweta. DeKalb, Douglas, Favette. Forsvth. Fulton, Gwhnett. Henrv, Paulding, and Rockdale Counties as follows: (i) All applicable facilities shall complv with the provisions of subparagraphs 

### 1. and 9. 11. Applicability. Prior to January 1.2015, the reauirementsof this subparagraph (ddd) shall applv to facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile orqanic compounds from offset lithoaraphv printinq equal or exceed 100tons per year and are located in Barrow. Bartow, Carroll, Hall, Newton, Spaldina, and Walton Counties as follows: li) All applicable facilities shall complv with the provisions of subparagraphs 

### I. and 9. 12. Applicability. Prior to Januarv 1. 2015, all letterpress printing operations are subject to the applicabilit~ and control requirements of sirbparaqraph 391-3-1-.02(2)(tt). Page 12 of 15 November 6,201 1Chapter 

### 391-3-1 Rulesfor Air Quality Control 13. Applicability. On and after January 1, 2015. the requirements of this subparagraph (ddd) shall apply to facilities at which actual emissions of volatile organic compounds from offset lithoqraphic printing and letter press printinq, before controls, equal or exceed 15 pounds per dav (or 2.7 tons per 12-month rolling period)for facilities located in Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas. Favette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, .Newton. Pauldinq, Rockdale, Spaldina, and Walton Counties as follows: (i) 1ndiv;dual heatset web offset lithoqraphic printina presses and individual heatset web letterpress printinq pressesthat have potentialemissions of volatile organic compounds from the dryer, prior to controls, that equal or exceed 25 tons per vear shall comply with the provisions of subparaqraph 

### 6; (ii) Individual heatset web offset lithoqraphic printinq presses that have potentialemissions of volatile organic compounds from the dryer, prior to controls, that do not equal or exceed 25 tons per vear and are located at facilities at which the potentialemissions of volatile orqanic compounds from offset lithography printinq equal or exceed 25 tons per year in Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb. Douglas, Fayette, Forsvth, Fulton, Gwinnett. Henrv. Pauldinq, and Rockdale Counties shall comply with the provisions of subparagraph l.(ii); (iii) Individual heatset web offset lithographic printing presses that have potentialemissions of volatile organic compounds from the dryer, priorto controls, that do not equal or exceed 25 tons per vear and are located at facilities at which the potential emissions of volatile organic compounds from offset lithoqraphy printinq equal or exceed 100tons per vear in Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Hall. Newton, Spaldinq, and Walton Counties shall complv with the provisions of subparagraph 

### I .(ii), {iv) All applicable facilities shall complv with the provisions of subparagraphs 2.. 3., 4.. 5., 7.. 

### 8., (v) Any physical or operational chanaesthat are necessarvto complv with the provisions specified in subparagraphs 13.(i) or (iv) are subiect to the compliance schedule specified in subparaqraph 15. 14. Applicability: The requirements of subparagraph 13. will no longer be applicable by the compliance deadlines if the counties specified inthose subparaqraphs are re-designated to attainment for the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone prior to January 

### 1. 2015 and such counties continue to maintainthat Standardthereafter. Instead, the provisions of subparagraphs lo., I?., and 12. will continue to apply on and after January 1, 2015. Inthe event the 1997 NationalAmbient Air Quality Standardfor ozone isviolated in the specified counties,the requirements of subparagraph 13. will only be reinstated if the Director determines that the measure is necessarv to meet the requirements of the continaencv plan. 15. Compliance Schedule: (i) An application for a permit to construct and operate volatile organic compound emission control systems andlor modifications of process andlor coatings used must be submitted to the Division no later than Julv 1, 

### 2014. Page 13 of I5 November 6,201 1Chapter 391-3-1 Rules for Air Quality Control lii) On-site of construction of emission control systems and/or modificationof process or coatings must be completed by November 

### I. 2014. liii) Full compliance with the applicable requirements specified in subparagraphs 13.(i)and (iv) must be completed before January 1, 2015.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(aaaa) "lndustrial Cleaning Solvents," is being addedto read as follows: Jaaaa) lndustrial Cleaning Solvents. 1. No person shall cause, suffer, allow, or permit the use of orqanic solvents for cleaning operations such as mixing vessels (tanks), spray booths, parts drums or for other cleaning activities performed for the removal of materialfrom substrate includinq actions such as wiping, flushing or spraying, unless the following requirements for control of emissions of the volatile organic compounds are satisfied: (i) All containers used for organic solvent-related materials are kept closed at all times except when depositina or removingthese materials; lii) All organic cleaninq solvents and used solvent-related materials includinq shop towels shall be stored in closed containers; (iii) Air circulation around cleaning-related operations and waste materials shall be minimized; {iv) All used solvent materials and shop towels shall be disposed 

### of in a manner that minimizes emissions (e.g.. movinq these itemsfrom one location to another in closed containers or pipes); (v.) Equipment shall be maintained in such a way that minimizes emissions (e.q., keeping parts cleaners covered, maintaining cleaning equipment to repair solvent leaks, etc.). 2. No person shall cause, suffer, allow, or permit volatile organic compound emissions from each cleaning process, spray gun cleaning, spray booth cleaning, large manufactured components cleaning, parts cleaninq, equipment cleaninq, line cleaninq, floor cleaninq, tank cleaninq or small manufacturedcomponents cleaninq to exceed 0.42 lbs of VOC per qallon (50 plliter) of cleaning material unless the cleaning operation is equippedwith an emission control system with an overall control efficiency of at least 85 percent. Alternatively, a VOC composite vapor pressure limit of 8 millimetersof mercury (mmHa) at 20' Celsius may be used as a replacement limit for VOC content limit. 3. The requirements of this subparaaraph shall not apply to any cleaning operations in categories sub~ect o other more specific VOC requirements contained in other subparagraphs of this Rule. The requirements of this subparaaraph shall not apply to cleaners used for low temperature (below 40°F) applications, or the use of ianitorial cleaners as relating to cleaning offices, bathrooms or other similar areas. 

### 4. For the purpose of this subparagraph, the following definition shall apply: Page 14 of 15 November6,2011Chapter 391-3-1 Rules for Air Quality Control (i) "Industrialcleanina solvents" means a variety of productsthat are used to remove contaminants such as adhesives, inks, paint, dirt, soil, oil, and grease from parts, products. tools, machinery, equipment,vessels, floors, walls, and other production relatedwork areas for a variety of reasons including safety, operab:lity, and to avoid product contamination. 5. ~pplicabilitv: On and after Januarv 1, 2015, the reauirementsof this Subparagraph (aaaa) shall apply to facilities at which actual emissions of volatile~rganic compoundsfrom the use of organic solvents for cleaning operations equal or exceed 15 pounds per dav for facilities located in Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton. Cobb. Coweta, DeKalb. Douglas, Fayette, Forsvth. Fulton. Gwinnett, Hall, Henrv. Newton, Pauldinq. Rockdale. Spaldinq, and Walton counties. Any physical or operational chanqes that are necessary to comply with the provisions specified in this Subparagraph (aaaa) are suoject to the compliance schedule specified in Subparagraph 7. Prior to January 1, 2015, such facilities shall comply with the provisions of Subparagraph 391-3-1-.02(2)(tt), if applicable. 

### 6. Applicabilitv: The requirementsof this Subparagraph (aaaa) will no longer be applicable by the compliance deadlines if the counties specified in subparagraph

### 5. are re-desiclnatedto attainment for the 1997 National Ambient Air Qualitv Standard for ozone prior to January 1. 2015. In the event the 1997 NationalAmbient Air Qualitv Standard for ozone isviolated inthe specified counties, the requirements of this Subparagraph (aaaa) will only be reinstated if the Director determinesthat the measure is necessaryto meet the requirements of the continaency 

## Plan. 7. Compliance Schedule: li) An application for a permit to construct and operate volatile organic compound emission control systems and/or modifications of process andlor coatinps used must be submitted to the Division no later than July 1, 2014. (ii) On-site constructionof emission control systems andlor modification of process or coatings must be completed by November 1, 2014. (iii) Full compliance with the applicable requirements specified this Subparagraph (aaaa) must be completed before January 1, 2015. Authority: O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1 et seq., as amended.

Page 15 of 15 November 6,2011

### Georgia Grour,

### I1 CTG SIP 

### Revision

APPENDIX B REVISIONS TO GEORGIA'S PROCEDURES FOR TESTINGAND MONITORING SOURCES OFAIR POLLUTANTS

# [Note: The following changes were finalized October 

# I,20

# I I. The underlined textis shown for illustrafivepurposed only for comparison to previous version of the document]

Al LLUTANTS

[REVISED: October 

# I, 201

# I]Table ofContents Rev. 

### W4-10/11 Page 1of 11 Introduction PART I: GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1 .I 

# - Applicability 1.2 

### - Performance and Compliance Testing 1.3 

### - Compliance with Standards and Maintenance Requirements 1.4 

### - Monitoring Requirements 1.5 

# - Notification and Record Keeping 1.6 - Incorporations by Reference 1.7 

### - General Control Device Requirements 1.8 

### - Required Overall Emissions Reduction Efficiency 1.9 

### - General Notification and Reporting Requirements PART 11: SOURCE CATEGORIES Section 2.1 

### - Fuel Burning Equipment 2.lb 

### - Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Constructed after June 19, 1984) 2.lc 

### - Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (NSPS) 2.2 

### - Incinerators 2.2b 

### - Municipal Waste Combustors 2.3 

### - Portland Cement Plants 2.4 

### - Nitric Acid Plants 2.5 

### - Sulfuric Acid Plants 2.6 

### - Asphalt Concrete Plants 2.7 

### - ~&roleum Refineries 2.8 

### - Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids and External Floating Roof Tanks 2.8a 

### - Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (Constructed after May 18, 1978) 2.86 

### - Volatile Organic LiquidStorageVessels (Including Petroleum LiquidStorageVessels--After July 23, 1984)Table of Contents 

### Rev. Z4-W Page 2 of 11 2.9 

### - Secondary Lead Smelters 2.10 

### - Secondary Brass and Bronze Ingot Production Plants 2.11 

### - lron and Steel Plants 2.11a 

# - lron and Steel Plants (Secondary Emissions) 2.12 

### - Sewage Treatment Plants 2.13 

### - Primary Copper Smelters 2.14 

### - Primary Zinc Smelters 2.15 

### - Primary Lead Smelters 2.16 

### - New Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants 2.22 

### - Coal Preparation Plants 2.23 

### - Ferroalloy Production Facilities 2.24 

### - Steel Plants: ElectricArc Furnaces 2.24a 

### - Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces and Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels (Constructed after August 7, 1983)


# - Metallurgical Melting 

### - Cupola Furnaces


# - Existing Kraft Pulp Mills


# - New Kraft Pulp Mills


# - Glass Manufacturing Plants


# - Grain Elevators



### - Surface Coating of Metal Furniture



### - Stationary Gas Turbines



### - Lime Manufacturing Plants



### - Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants



### - New Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations



### - New Bulk Gasoline Terminals



### - Paper Coating (All Sources)



### - Graphic Arts Industry: Publication Rotogravure Printing (NSPS Sources)Table of Contents ~ev'. 

### ZW-10/11 Page 3 of 11
2.45 

### - Graphic Arts Industry: All Sources



### - Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating Operations (NSPS Sources)


# - Metal Coil Coating



### - Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Plants



### - Equipment Leaks of VOC inthe Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Industry



### - Industrial Surface Coating of Large Appliances



### - Beverage Can Coating



### - Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts



### - Wire Coating



### - Rubber Tire Manufacturing lndustry (NSPS Sources)



### - Paper Coating Operations



### - Industrial Cleanine Solvents



### - Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing


# - Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries


# - SyntheticOrganic ChemicalManufacturing Industry (SOCMI) -AirOxidation Unit Processes



### - Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) 

### - Distillation Operations


# - Non-Metallic Mineral Processing Plants



### - Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants



### - Surface Coating of Plastic Parts for Business Machines



### - Calciners and Dryers inMineral industries


# - Visible Emissions



### - Granular and Mixed Fertilizer Manufacturing Plants



### - NormalSuperphosphate Facilities



### - Kaolin and Fuller's Earth Manufacturing Processes


# - Cotton Gins



### - General Manufacturing ProcessesTable of Contents Rev. 2LWE Page 4 of 11
2.105 

### - Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer Processes 2.106 

# - Ammonium Sulfate Processes 2.107 

### - Metallic Mineral Processing Plants 2.108 

### - Synthetic Fiber Production Facilities 2.109 

# - Fabric and Vinyl Coating (All Sources) 2.1 10 

### - GasolineTransport Vehicles 2.11 1 

# - Major Stationary Sources of VOC 2.1 12 

### - Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations (All Sources) 2.1 13 

### - Flat Wood Paneling 2.114 

### - Municipal SolidWaste Landfills 2.115 

### - Gasoline Dispensing Facility 

### - Stage I1 2.116 

# - Electric Utility Steam Generation Units 2.117 

### - HospitallMedicalllnfectious Waste Incinerators (Constructed Before June 20, 1996) 2.1 18 

# - Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities 2.119 

### - Fuel Burning Equipment 2.120 

# - Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity 2.121 

### - Large Stationary Gas Turbines 2.122 

### - Commercial and lndustrial Solid Waste Incineration (Constructed before November 30, 1999) 2.123 

### - VOC Emissions from Extruded Polystyrene Products Manufacturing Utilizing an Injected BlowingAgent 2.124 

### - Multipollutant Control for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units 2.125 

### - Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Plants 2.126 

# - Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Plastic Parts and Products 2.127 

# - Surface Coating of Miscellaneous IndustrialAdhesives 2.128 

### - Surface Coating of Pleasure Craft 2.129 

### - VOC Emissions from Fiberglass Boat ManufacturingTable of Contents Rev. 

### UlL10/11 Page 5 of 11
PART Ill: HAZARDOUSAIR POLLUTANTS Section 3.0 

### - General Provisions 3.1 

### - Asbestos 3.2 

### - Beryllium 3.4 

### - Mercury 3.5 

# - Ethylene Dichloride, Vinyc Chloride, and Polyvinyl Chloride PLants 3.21 

### - Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources) 3.27 

### - BenzeneTransfer Operations PART IV: APPENDICES Appendix A 

### - Part I 

### - Test Methods: Method 1 

### - Sample and VelocityTraverses for Stationary Sources Method 1A 

### - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources with Small Stacks or Ducts Method 2 

# - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube) Method 2A 

# - Direct Measurement of Gas Volume Through Pipes and Small Ducts Method 28 

# - Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate from Gasoline Vapor Incinerators Method 2C 

### - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate in Small Stacks or Ducts (Standard PitotTube) Method 2D 

### - Measurement of Gas Volumetric Flow Rates inSmall Pipes and Ducts Method2E 

### - Determination of Landfill Gas Production Flow Rate Method 2F 

### - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity And Volumetric Flow Rate With Three-Dimensional Probes Method 2G 

### - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate With Two-Dimensional Probes Method 2H 

# - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity Taking IntoAccount Velocity Decay Near the Stack Wall Method 3 

# - Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight Method 3A 

### - Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations inEmissionsfrom Stationary Sources [Instrumental Analyzer Procedure]Method 3B Method 3C Method 4 Method 5 Method 5A
Method 5D Method 5E
Method 5F Method 5T
Method 6 Method 6A
Method 68
Method 6C
Method 7 Method7A Method 7B
Method 7C
Method 7D
Method 7E Method 8 Method 9 Method 10 Table of Contents Rev. 

### -10/11 Page 6 of 11



### - Gas Analysis for the Determinationof Emission Rate Correction Factor or Excess Air



### - Determination of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrogen, and Oxygen from StationarySources



### - Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases



### - Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Determination of Particulate Emissions from theAsphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Industry



### - Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Positive Pressure Fabric Filters


# - Determinationof Particulate Emissionsfrom theWool Fiberglass InsulationManufacturing Industry


# - Determination of Nonsulfate Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources


# - Determinationof Particulate Emissionsfrom Stationary Sources

### - Total DryandWet Catch Method


# - Determinationof Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources


# - Determinationof Sulfur Dioxide, Moisture, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion Sources


# - Determination of Sulfur Dioxideand Carbon Dioxide Daily Average Emissionsfrom Fossil Fuel Combustion Sources


# - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissionsfrom Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)


# - Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from StationarySources



### - Determination of NitrogenOxide Emissionsfrom StationarySources (IonChromatography)



### - Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry)


# - Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (AlkalinePermanganatellon Colorimetric Method)



### - Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (AlkalinePermanganatellonChromatographic Method)



### - Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental

Analyzer Procedure) 

### - Determination of Sulfuric Acid Mist and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from StationarySources


# - Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary SourcesTable of Contents Rev. 

### UM-10/11 Page 7 of 11
Method 10A
Method 10B Method 11 Method 12 Method 13A
Method 13B
Method 14
Method 15
Method 15A
Method 16 Method 16A
Method 168 Method 16C
Method 17
Method 18 Method 19
Method 20
Method 21 Method 22 

# - Determination of Carbon Monoxide EmissionsinCertifyingContinuous EmissionMonitoring Systems at Petroleum Refineries



### - Determinationof Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Determination of Hydrogen Sulfide Content of Fuel Gas Streams in Petroleum Refineries



### - Determinationof Inorganic Lead Emissions from StationarySources



### - Determination of Total Fluoride Emissions from Stationary Sources 

### - SPADNS Zirconium Lake Method


# - Determinationof Total FluorideEmissions from Stationary Sources

### - Specific Ion Electrode Method 

# - Determination of Fluoride Emissions from Potroom Roof Monitors for Primary Aluminum Plants



### - Determinationof HydrogenSulfide, CarbonylSulfide, and Carbon DisulfideEmissionsfrom Stationary Sources



### - Determinationof Total ReducedSulfur Emissionsfrom Sulfur Recovery Plants inPetroleum Refineries



### - Semicontinuous Determinationof Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (Impinger

Technique)



### - Determination of Total ReducedSulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental

Analyzer Procedure)



### - Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (In-Stack Filtration Method)



### - Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas Chromatography



### - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Removal Efficiency and Particulate Matter, Sulfur Dioxide, and Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rates



### - Determination of NitrogenOxides, Sulfur Dioxide, and Oxygen Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines



### - Determination of Votatile Organic Compounds Leaks



### - Visual Determinationof Fugitive Emissions from Material Sources and Smoke Emissions

from FlaresMethod 23
Method 24
Method 24A
Method 25 Method 25A Method 25B
Method 25C Method 25D Method 25E Method 26 Method 26A
Method27 Method 29 Method 30A
Method 308
Method 101
Method 101A Method 102
Method 103 Method I04 Method 105 Method 106 Table of Contents Rev. 

### 244-m Page 8 of 11



### - Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans

from Stationary Sources



### - Determination of Volatile Matter Content, Water Content, Density, Volume Solids, and

Weight Solids of Surface Coatings


# - Determination of Volatile Matter Content and Density of Printing Inks and Related Coatings



### - Determination of Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon



### - Determination ofTotal Gaseous Organic Concentration Usinga Flame IonizationAnalyzer



### - Determination of Total Gaseous Organic Concentration Using a Nondispersive Infrared

Analyzer


# - Determination of Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) inMSW Landfill Gases



### - Determinationof the Volatile Organic Concentration of Waste Samples



### - Determination of Vapor Phase Organic Concentration inWaste Samples



### - Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary Sources 

### - lsokinetic Method



### - Determination of Vapor Tightness of Gasoline Delivery Tank UsingPressure-VacuumTest



### - Determination of Metals Emissions from Stationary Sources



### - Determinationof Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions From Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)


# - Determinationof TotalVapor Phase Mercury Emissions From Coal-FiredCombustion

Sources Using Carbon Sorbent Traps



### - Determinationof Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissionsfrom Chlor-Alkali Plants-Air Streams



### - Determinationof Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions from Stationary Sources


# - Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions from Chlor-Alkali PlantsHydrogen Streams



### - Beryllium Screening Method



### - Determinationof Beryllium Emissionsfrom Stationary Sources


# - Determinationof Mercury inWastewater Treatment Plant Sewage Sludge



### - Determinationof Vinyl Chloridefrom Stationary SourcesTable of Contents Rev. 

### ZHA-10/11 Page 9 of 11
Method 107 

### - Determination of Vinyl Chloride Content of Process Stream Samples Method 107A 

### - Determination of Vinyl Chloride Content of Solvents, Resin-SolventSolution, Polyvinyl Chloride Resin, Resin Slurry, Wet Resin, and Latex Samples Method 108 

# - Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Arsenic Emissions Method 108A 

### - Determination of Arsenic Content inOre Samples from Nonferrous Smelters Method 1088 

### - Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples from Nonferrous Smelters Method 108C 

### - Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples from Nonferrous Smelters Method 200 

### - Determination of Total Particulate, Free Chlorine, and Total Chlorides from Secondary Aluminum Smelters and Other Stationary Sources Method 201 

### - Determination of PMlo Emissions (Exhaust Gas ~ecycie Procedure) Method 201A 

### - Determination of PMfoEmissions (ConstantSampling Rate Procedure) Method 202 

### - Determination of Condensible Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources Method 204 

# - Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure Method 204A 

# - Volatile Organic Compounds Content in Liquid lnput Stream Method 204B 

### - Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions inCapture Stream Method 204C 

### - Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions inCaptured Stream (Dilution Technique) Method 204D 

### - Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions in FugitiveStream from TemporaryTotal Enclosure ~ethod 204E 

### - Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions in Fugitive Stream from Building Enclosure Method 204F 

# - Volatile Organic Compounds Content in Liquid lnput Stream (Distillation Approach) Method 300

,

# - Determination of Surface CoatingTransfer Efficiency Method 301

. 

### - Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methodsfrom Various Waste Media Method 304A 

### - Determination of Biodegradation Rates of Organic Compounds (Vent Option) Method 3046 

### - Determination of Biodegradation Rates of Organic Compounds (ScrubberOption) Method 305 - Measurement of Emission Potential of Individual Volatile Organic Compounds inWaste Method 306 

### - Determination of Chromium Emissionsfrom Decorativeand HardChromium Electroplating and Anodizing Operations Method 306A 

### - Determination of Chromium Emissionsfrom DecorativeandHard Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Operations

### Table of Contents 

### Rev. 

### 2LW10/11 Page 10 of 

### 11
Method 3068
Method 307
Method 308 Method 310A Method 3100 Method 310C 

### - Surface Tension Measurement and Recordkeeping for Chromium PlatingTanks Used at Electroplatingand Anodizing Facilities


# - Determinationof Emissions from Halogenated Solvent Vapor Cleaning Machines using a Liquid Level Procedure


# - Procedurefor Determination of Methanol Emissions from Stationary Sources


# - Determinationof Residual Hexanethrough Gas Chromatography



### - Determinationpf Residual Solvent through Gas Chromatography

. Determinationof Residual N-Hexanein EPDM Rubber through Gas Chromatography Method 311 

### - Analysis of HazardousAir Pollutant Compounds in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph Method 312A 

### - Determinationof Styrene inLatex Styrene-ButadieneRubberthrough Gas Chromatography Method 3128 

### - Determinationof Residual Styrene inStyrene-Butadiene(SBR) Rubber Latex by Capillary Gas Chromatography Method 312C 

### - Determinationof Residual Styrene in SBR Latex Produced by Emulsion PolymerizationSection 2.1 24 Rev. (4

### 2) 

### w10/11 Page 1 of 2 Method 313A 

### - Determinationof Residual Hydrocarbons in Rubber Crumb Method 3138 

# - The Determination of Residual Hydrocarbon in Solution Polymers by Capillary Gas
Method 316 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C

Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F

Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I Chromatography



### - SamplingandAnalysis for FormaldehydeEmissionsfrom StationarySources intheMineral

Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries



### - Part I1 

### - Field Data Sheets



### - Continuous Emission Monitor Performance Specifications



### - QualityAssurance Proceduresfor Gas Chromatography: Procedure 1 

### - Determination of Adequate Chromatographic Peak Resolution Procedure 2 

# - Procedurefor Field Auditing GC Analysis



### - Determination of Emission Rate Change



### - Performance Specifications for Flow Monitors



### - QualityAssurance Procedures: Procedure 1 

### - QualityAssurance Requirementsfor Gas Continuous EmissionMonitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination Procedure 2 - Quality Assurance Requirements For Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems At Stationary sources 

# - Protocolsfor DeterminingVOC Capture Efficiency



### - Calculationof VOC Emissionsfrom Open Molding Fiber-ReinforcedPlastics Manufacturing



### - Performance Test Calculations and Reporting PARTV: BIBLIOGRAPHYSection 2.56 Rev. (0) 8111 

# - Paae 1 of 5 

### 2.56 IndustrialCleanin8 Solvents
2.56.1 Applicabilitv and DesiplnationofAffected Facility The provisions of this source cateeory apply to each facility that uses organic solvents for cleanine operations.
2.56.2 Definitions and Symbols All symbols usedinthis sourcecategory notdefined below are eiven the meaningintheCleanAir Act of 1970 (asamended) or the GeorqiaAir Quality Act (asamended) or'in publishedreeulations pertaining thereto. 

## c, - - the VOC concentration in each eas stream leaving the control device and entering the atmosphere (parts per million byvolume, as carbon) Cb 

### - - the VOC concentration ineachgas stream enteringthecontroldevice (parts per
- million by volume, as carbon) Cf 

### - - the VOC concentration ineach gas stream emitted directly to the atmosphere @arts per million byvolume. as carbon)
Dd 

### - - density of each diluent VOC-solvent (pounds per gallon) - DL 

### - - density of VOC-solvent recovered by an emission control device (pounds per 

### gallon) E 

### - - VOC destruction efficiency of the control device (fraction) F 

### - - the proportion of total VOCs emitted by an affected facility that enters the control device (fraction) L, 

### - - the volume of each solvent consumed, as received (gallons) - 

### Lr - 

### - the volume of VOC-solvent recovered by an emission control device (liters) 

### Md_ 

### - - the mass of diluent VOC-solvent consumed (pounds) M, 

### - - the mass of VOCs ina solvent consumed, as received (pounds) 

### Mr - 

### - the mass of VOCs recovered by an emission control device (pounds) 

### Q, 

### - - the volumetric flow rate of each qas stream leaving the control device and entering the atmosphere (dry standard cubic feet per hour) 

## 9b = the volumetric flow rate of each gas stream enterin2 the control device (dry standard cubic feet per hour)Section 2.56 

### Rev. (0)



### - 

# A - thevolumetric flow rate of each gas streamemitteddirectlytothe atmosphere (drv standardcubic feett per hour)

2.56.3 PerformanceTests and Compliance Provisions (a) The provisions of paragraph (f) of Section 1.2 of this text only apply to the required initialerformance tests, and tl~e~rovisions of paragraph (h)of Section 1.2 of apply only for the dete[n!ication qf_tkgvecallreduction efficiency, R. (b) The owner or operator of an affected facility shaN conductthe initialperformancetest as required under Section 1.2 accordingto procedures inthis section: and, thereafter, procedures inthis section shall be used to conduct any required periodic performance tests todemonstrate compliancewiththe applicableGeorgia Requlationsfor Air Quality Control. (c) The owner or operator shall use the following proceduresfor determining compliance with the applicable regulations. (1) An owner or operator shall use the following proceduresfor any affected facility which does not use a capture svstem and control device to comply with the applicable emission limit. The owner or operator shall determinethe composition of the solvents bvformulation data supplied by the manufacturer of the solvent. The owner or operator shall determine the volume of the ink or coating and the mass of VOC-solvent used for thinning purposes from company records on the same basis as the averaging period. (2) An owner or operator shall use the following proceduresfor anv affected facilitv that uses a capture svstem and a control device that destrovs VOCs (e.g., incinerator) to comply with the applicable emission limit. (i)Determjnqthe overall reduction efficiency IR) for the captwe svstem and controldevice. For the initialperformancetest the overall reductionefficiegcy (R) shall be determinedas prescribed in (c)(2)(i) (A), (R), and (C) of thissection. In subsequent averaging periods, the owner or operator may use the most recentlv determined overall reduction efficiencv (R) for the performancetest providing control device and capture system operating conditions have not chanqed. The procedure in, (c)(2)(i) (AL (BL and (CL of this section, shall be repeatedwhen directed bythe Directororwhen the owneroroperatorelectsto operate the control device or capture svstem at conditions different from the initial performancetest. (A) Determinethe fraction (F) of totalVOCs emitted byanaffected facility that enters the control device using the following equation or as provided inAppendix Gof this text:Section 2.56 Rev. 

### (0) 811 1 

# - Page 3 of 5



### Where:
n is the number ofgas streams entering the control device, and


### m is the number of gas streams emitted directly to the atmosphere. (B) Determinethe destruction efficiency of the control device 

### (E)using values of the volumetric flow rate of each of the gas streams and the VOC content (as carbon) of each of the gas streams inand out of the device bv the following, equation:

Where:
n isthe numberof gas streams entering the control device, and
m isthe numberof gas streams Leavingthe controldevice and entering the atmosphere. (3) An owneror operator shall usethe following procedurefor any affected facility which usesa controldevicethat recovers theVOCs (e.g., carbon adsorption)to complvwith the applicableemission limit. Note: Ifthe owner or operatorcan demonstrateto the satisfactionof the Directorthat the procedureof paragraph @)(3)(i), (ii), (iii) are impractical due to the Leneth of the averagine period. then the procedure of paragraph W2)may be used. (i) Calculatethe mass ofVOCs used (Mo+Md) duringeach averaging,period' 

### - - for each affected facility bv the following eauation:

(LdiLla will be 

### 0 if no VOC solvent isadded to the cleaning solvent, as received.)Section 2.56 Rev. (0)

Where:
n isthe numberof different solvents used during the averaging period, and 

### - m is the number of different diluent VOC-solvents used durinq the averaging period. (ii) Calculatethe total mass of VOCs recovered (MJ durinq each averaging period using thefollowing equation:

(iii) Calculateoverall reductionefficiencvofthe controldevice (R)for each averaging period for each affected facilitv usinq the followinq equation:

2.56.4 Monitoring of Emissions and Operations (a) The owner or operator of an affected facility which uses a capture svstem and an incinerator to complv with the emission Limits shall install, calibrate. maintain, and operate temperature measurement devices accordinq to the following procedures: (1) Where thermal incineration is used, a temperature measurement device shall be installed inthefirebox. Where catalvtic incinerationis used, a temperature measurement device shall be installed in the gas stream immediatelv before and after the catalvst bed. (2) Each temperature measurement device shall be installed, calibrated, and maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications. The device shall have an accuracv of the greater of 0.75 percent of the temperature being measured expressed indegrees Celsius or i2.5"C. (3) Each temperature measurement device shall be equipped with a recordinq device so that a permanent continuous record is produced. (b) The owner or operator of an affected facilitvwhich uses a capturesystem and a solvent recovery systemtocoflply with thezj~ion limits shall install the cquipment necessary to determine thc total vol~.meof VOC-solvdt rccovercd for each averaqine period.Section 2.56 Rev. (0)

2.56.5 Test Methods and Procedures 811 1 

# - Page 5 of 5
(a) The referencemethods inAppendixA tothis part, except as provided under Section 1.2, shall be used todetermine compliance with the applicable standards as follows: (1) Method 25 for the measurementof VOC concentration. (2) Method 1 for sample and velocity traverses. (3) Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate. (4) Method 3 for gas analysis. (5) Method4 for stack gas moisture. (b) For Method 25, the minimum samplingtime for each of the 3 runs is60 minutes and the minimum sample volume is 0.003 dry standard cubic meters, except that shorter sampling times or smaller volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the Director. (c) The Directorwill approvetesting of representativestacks on a case-by-casebasis ifthe owner or operator can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that testing of representative stacks vields results comparable to those that would be obtained bv testing all stacks. (d) The protocols and methods of Appendix G shall be used to determine the capture efficiency.

'Each

.. dav or fraction of a dav in which an affected facility isoperated is considered the averaging pcriod unless otherwisespecified 01- approvedhy the Director.

### Georgia Group I1 

### CTG 

### SIPRevision

APPENDIX C POTENTIALLYAFFECTED SOURCELISTING

### Flexible Package Printing (Graphic Arts) 

# - GeorgiaRule 

### (rnm): 12 Potentially Affected Sources FacilityName GraphicPackaging International, Inc. Printpack Inc InternationalPaper Company ExopackLLC Mead Packaging Owens CorningInsulating Systems,LLC Simkins Industries World ColorPrinting (USA) Corp. (dbaWorldcolorAtlanta) Hood Packaging Corp Amcor Tobacco Packaging Americas, Inc. ScientificGames 

### International Bagcraftpapercon I11

### LLC Lithographic Printing - 

### Georgia Rule (ddd): 

### 3 Potentially Affected Sources 

## AIRS# FacilityName 08900047 GraphicPackaging International, Inc. 12100679 Vertis, Inc. 08900143 World ColorPrinting (USA) Corp. 

### (dba WorldcolorAtlanta)
Indwtrial Cleaning Solvents 

### -Georgia Rule (aaaa) : 

### 0 Potentially Affected Sources Flat Wood Paneling -Georgia Rule 

### (ii) : 

### 0 Potentially Affected Sources

### Georgia Group 

### I1 CTG SIP Revision

APPENDIX

### D EQUIVALENT EMISSION CALCULATIONS

### Rule (mm) 

### Stringency Calculations In orderto compare the stringency ofthe emission limits in the existing Georgia Rule (mm) to those in the Flexible Package Printing CTG, the emission limitations need to put in the sameunits. Below are the calculations used to detelmine equivalent limits. Assumptions:

Givens: 

### - Rule (mm) has three emissionlimits: 40% VOC by volume ofthe coatingminus water 25% VOC by val~tme otthe volatile contentofthe coating and 0.5ibs of VOC Ib of solids as applied 

### - The FlexiblePackagcPrinting CTG has two equivalent emission limits: 0.16 Ibs ofVOC and Ibs of coating as applied (with water) 0.8 ibs ofVOC Ibof solids as applied Calculations for 0.16 lbs ofVOC lhs of coating as applied (with water) Asszrinptionsareshowin italics To find the weight percent ofVOCs: 0.16 ibs ofVOC X 100 = 16 %VOC by weight Ibs ofcoating as applied (with water) To find the percent VOC by volume: 0.16 lbs ofVOC X IpaNon VOC X 8.00lb coding - 0.1739 adVOC - Ib coating 7.361b VOC gallo,?coaling gallon coating



# . To findthe percent VOC by volatile contentof coating: 20% solids by voltme = 0.2 gallon solids 1gallon coating 1aallon of solids ivolatiles gallonofcoating 0.2 eallan solids = 0.8 aallonvalatiles gallon of coating gallon coating 0.1739 gal VOC X 1 aallon coaling - 0.2266 don VOC =21.7% VOC, by volamc, ofvolatile content - Gallon coating 0.8 gallonvolatiles gallonvolatiles The rule (mm) 40% by volume of coating minus water cannot he convertedto the same form as the CTG.

### Rule (ddd) 

### Stringency Calculations In order to compare the stringency ofthe emission limitsinthe existing Georgia Rule (ddd) to those in Lithographicand Letterpress CTG, the emissionlimitationsneed toput in the sameunits. Below are the calculationsused to determine equivalentlimits.



# . Assumptions: Densitvis ofalcoholis 6.77 lbsIzallon* , 

### - I):usity dit sr.idard mi ofalcohnl ad ;~Ic.h.d rthitlltr is 7uUlhr /~sllon'* - I):nrliy ofal:~,lt,~l wbdiw7.50 lhs/gixllun~'* Fountain Solution containsno solids Givens: 

### - Rule (ddd) has one emission limit: 8%or less VOC, by valt~me


### - The Lithographicand Letterpress Printing CTGhas separatelimits forheatssetweb offset lithographic printing, sheet-fed offset lithographic printing and coldest web offset lithographic printing: Heatsetweb offset: r l.G%alcohol by weight, or a solntion of3% alcohol by weight or less (on press) and refrigerated below 60F (this control technique is cqnivalentto 1.6% alcohol by without cooling), or 5% alcohol substitute orless by weight (on-press) and noalcohol in foontain sol~ition Sheet-fed offset: 5% alcoholby weight, or 

# . a solutionof 8.5% alcohol by weight or less (on press) and refrigerated below 60F(this controltechnique is equivalentto 5% alcohol by without cooling), or 5% alcohol substitute orless by weight (on-press) andnoalcohol in fountain solution Coldsetweb oMet: 5% alcohol substitute or less by weight (on-press) and no alcohol in fountain solution

Calculations for 8%VOC by volume Fraction ofWater in Fountain Solution at 8% byvolume VOC limit:

Weight ofWater in Fountain Solution at 8%by volume VOC limit: 0.92 gallons ofWater X 8.341bs of~vater - 7.67 lbs ofwater - gallon of Fountain Solution gallon of water gallon of fountain solution Weight of Alcohol in Fonnlain Solution at 8%(alcohol only) by volume VOC limit: 0.08 gallons of VOC (alcohol) X 6.77lhs ofalcol~ol - 0.542 lbs of VOC (alcohol) - gallon ofFountain Solution gallon ofalcohol gallons of fountain solution Weight ofAlcohol and Alcohol Substitute in Foontain Solntion at 8%(standard mixed VOC) by volume VOC limit: 0.08 gallons ofVOC(alcohol& substitute) X 7.0lhs ofVOC f"hol&srr~sfitufe) - 0.56 lbs ofVOC(alcohol& Substitute) - gallon of Fountain Solution gnllonofoIcohol gallons of fountain solotion Weight ofAlcohol Substitute in Fountain Solution at 8% (alcohol substitute)volume VOC limit:

= 0.6 lbs ofVOC (alcoholsobstih~te) gallons ofwaterPercent~Icohol by weight to compare to limit:
7.67 lbs ofvater 

### + 0.542 lbs ofVOC = 8.212lbs ofFountain solution
0.542 lbs ofVOC - - 0.066 VOC, or 8.212 lbs ofPauntain solution 6.6% VOCby weiglrt

### in forrnfnirt solution Percent alcohol & substituteby weight to compare to limit:
7.671bs ofwater 

### + 0.561bs ofVOC = 8.23 lbs ofFountain solution
0.56 Ibs ofVOCl - - 0.068 VOC fractionor 8.23 ibs 0fFount~in solution 6.8% VOCby weigltt in formfninsolution



# . Percent substitute by weightto compare tolimit:
7.67 lbs ofwater 

### + 0.6 lbs of VOC = 8.27lbs ofFountain solution
0.6 Ibs of alcohol - 0.0726 VOC fraction or 8.27 lbs ofFountainsolution 7.26%nlcohol&srrbstitrrte by ~veiglzt irz

formfni~t solution