alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION**

I, Tom W. Ward, certify that:

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this 10-K/A Report of Exabyte Corporation; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated:  January 10, 2006

                /s/ Tom W.Ward                                            

Tom W. Ward

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
**Annex 9. Item 7.6. – Article 11.2.2. of Chapter 11.2. Infection with *Bonamia exitiosa***

CHAPTER 11.2. INFECTION WITH *BONAMIA EXITIOSA*

[...]

Article 11.2.2.

Scope

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.: Argentinean flat oyster (*Ostrea puelchana*), Ariake cupped oyster (*Magallana* [syn. *Crassostrea*]*ariakensis*), Australian mud oyster (*Ostrea angasi*), Chilean flat oyster (*Ostrea chilensis*), crested oyster (*Ostrea equestris*), eastern oyster (*Crassostrea virginica*), European flat oyster (*Ostrea edulis*)~~,~~and Olympia oyster (*Ostrea lurida*)**~~and Suminoe oyster (*Magallana*[syn.***Crassostrea*]*ariakensis*)~~.

[...]

_______________
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 531 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 531

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 19, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4038) to require that supplemental 
certifications and background investigations be completed prior to the admission 
of certain aliens as refugees, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2018311EN.01000501.xml

| 3.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szekszárdi Járásbíróság (Hungary) lodged on 5 June 2018 — Ágnes Weil v Géza Gulácsi

(Case C-361/18)

(2018/C 311/05)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szekszárdi Járásbíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ágnes Weil

Defendant: Géza Gulácsi

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, if requested by one of the parties, the court of the Member State that delivered the decision must issue the certificate relating to the decision automatically, without examining if [the case] falls within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, if requested by one of the parties, the court of the Member State that delivered the decision must issue the certificate relating to the decision automatically, without examining if [the case] falls within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012?

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that a repayment action between members of an unregistered non-marital partnership fall within the scope of the rights in property arising out of a relationship deemed by the law applicable to such relationship to have comparable (legal) effects to marriage? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that a repayment action between members of an unregistered non-marital partnership fall within the scope of the rights in property arising out of a relationship deemed by the law applicable to such relationship to have comparable (legal) effects to marriage?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 14, 2003

/s/ Michael J. Small
------------------------------------
Michael J. Small
Chief Executive Officer and Director
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 8115** 

DANTE A. JONES ,

P laintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

WARDEN GREG HERSHBERGER; LIBRARIAN ADDIS N. KAMBULE; BRADLEY WOODFALL, Case Management Specialist; ASSISTANT WARDEN DENISE A. MORGAN; SERGEANT ROGER G. MUELLER; KELLY L. UPOLE ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:1 2

- cv
- 00 702

- ELH )

Submitted : March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dante A. Jones , Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane

- Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Dante A. Jones appeals the district court ’ s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible er ror. Accordingly, w e affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Jones v. Hershberger , No. 1:12

- cv
- 00702

- ELH (D. Md. Dec.

11, 2012)

. We deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Albany, 1754
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

At the old Stadt Huys in Albany, New York, colonial representatives devised a plan for a union of the colonies. The plan was ultimately rejected, but it became a guide for the later federal government.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. Cox first executed the murals in the eastern north-south corridor, starting work in 1973 and finishing in 1974. This corridor has been termed the Hall of Capitols because it features paintings of 16 different buildings that housed the Continental and United States Congresses from 1754 to 1865. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7085

HENRY C. WARTH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Mount Olive Correctional Complex; WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondents - Appellees, and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Respondent.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-798-3) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Henry C. Warth, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Scott E. Johnson, Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Warth v. Warden , No. CA-96-798-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 11, 1997). To theextent that Appellant raises issues on appeal that were not presented in his § 2254 petition to the district court, we decline to address the issues. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
927 P.2d 449

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

October 28, 1996

17742

#### State v. Pressley

Order No. 96-22

Affirmed
**Annex 11. Item 7.7. – Article 11.4.1. and 11.4.2. of Chapter 11.4. Infection with *Marteilia refringens***

CHAPTER 11.4.INFECTION WITH *MARTEILIA REFRINGENS*

Article 11.4.1. 

For the purposes of the *Aquatic Code*, infection with *Marteilia refringens*means *infection*with the *pathogenic agent**M. refringens*(including O and M types) of the Family Marteiliidae.

Information on methods for *diagnosis*is provided in the *Aquatic Manual*.

Article 11.4.2. 

Scope

The recommendations in this chapter apply to: blue mussel (*Mytilus edulis*), dwarf oyster (*Ostrea stentina*), European flat oyster (*Ostrea edulis*), European razor clam (*Solen marginatus*), golden mussel (*Xenostrobus securis*),~~Australian  mud  oyster  *(Ostrea angasi)*, Argentinean oyster *(Ostrea puelchana)*, Chilean flat oyster *(Ostrea chilensis)*, blue mussel *(Mytilus edulis)*and~~ Mediterranean mussel *(Mytilus galloprovincialis)*and striped venus clam**(*Chamelea gallina*). ~~These recommendations also apply to any other *susceptible species*referred to in the *Aquatic Manual*when traded internationally.~~

[...]

____________
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**578 CA 13-01943**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

SEVEN CORNERS SHOPPING CENTER FALLS CHURCH, VA. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
TRACEY LING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

FREEMAN LEWIS LLP, NEW YORK CITY (ROBERT Y. LEWIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (DALE A. WORRALL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered March 21, 2013 in a breach of contract action. The judgment awarded plaintiff money damages against defendant Tracey Ling.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation withdrawing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 12 and 13, 2014,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 646 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 646

 Expressing the position of the House of Representatives in the matter 
         of United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15-674.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

   Ms. Lofgren (for herself, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Conyers, Ms. 
 Slaughter, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Butterfield, Ms. Judy Chu of California, 
 Mr. Crowley, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Honda, Ms. 
    Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. Schrader, and Mr. Clyburn) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the position of the House of Representatives in the matter 
         of United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15-674.

    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives in the Supreme Court in 
        the matter of United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15-
        674, supports the position of the petitioners; and
            (2) the House of Representatives supports the position 
        stated in the amicus brief filed before the U.S. Supreme Court 
        on March 8, 2016, on behalf of 186 Democratic House Members and 
        39 Democratic Senators in support of the Obama Administration's 
        position in United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15-674, 
        namely, that the Administration's immigration executive actions 
        are authorized by existing laws enacted by Congress and are 
        consistent with actions taken by both Democratic and Republican 
        presidents since the Eisenhower Administration.
                                 <all>
```
January 6, 1998

19229

#### Kutsch v. County of Maui; County of Maui v. Hyatt Corp.

Affirmed
H. Res. 751 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 26, 2016. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution— 

(a) the House hereby takes from the Speaker’s table the 

bill (H.R. 2577) making appropriations for the Departments 

of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, 

and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2016, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment 

thereto, and concurs in the Senate amendment with an 

amendment consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 

114–56; and 

(b) it shall be in order for the chair of the Committee 

on Appropriations or his designee to move that the House insist on its amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 

2577 and request a conference with the Senate thereon. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02096]

[[Page 6306]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting--Closed Meeting

    The following notice of a closed meeting is published pursuant to 
the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-
409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: February 4, 2013 at 12:00 p.m.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th 
Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Litigation Matters. In the event that the 
time or date of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, 
along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Natise Stowe, Executive Assistant, 
202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-02096 Filed 1-28-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. at March 31, 1998, and its statement of
income for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. for the three months
ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,876,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,868
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      22,281,166
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,540,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,570,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,419,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,570,874
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,056,894
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,968
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                958,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            958,303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   958,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Opinion issued June 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00283-CV

———————————

MARIKI DONNEL EARL, Appellant

V.

SOHAIL R. SIDDIQUI, LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, SAM’S 

PHARMACY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 14-DCV-216215

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Mariki Donnel Earl, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a) (West 2013), 101.041 

(West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts 
2

of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made 

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did 

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.