alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHAPTER 10.1.**INFECTION WITH EPIZOOTIC HAEMATOPOIETIC NECROSIS VIRUS**

Article 10.1.2.

**Scope**

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.: ~~black bullhead *(Ameiurus melas)*, crimson spotted rainbow fish *(Melanotaenia fluviatilis)*, eastern mosquito fish *(Gambusia holbrooki)*, European perch *(Perca fluviatilis)*, macquarie perch *(Macquaria australasica)*, mosquito fish *(Gambusia affinis)*, mountain galaxias *(Galaxias olidus)*, northern pike *(Esox lucius)*, pike-perch *(Sander lucioperca)*, rainbow trout *(Oncorhynchus mykiss)* and silver perch *(Bidyanus bidyanus)*.~~

[...]

___________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995<F1>
<CASH>                                          72,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  374,441<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,994<F3>
<INVENTORY>                                    559,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,137,201
<PP&E>                                       1,571,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                 554,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,442,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          656,890
<BONDS>                                        895,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       320,497
<OTHER-SE>                                     187,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,442,192
<SALES>                                      3,803,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,803,846
<CGS>                                        3,217,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,217,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,708
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                175,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,824
<DISCONTINUED>                                (96,493)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR ENDS ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER 31.
FISCAL YEAR 1995 CONSISTED OF 52 WEEKS AND ENDED ON DECEMBER 30, 1995.  ALL
QUARTERS IN 1995 HAVE 12 WEEKS, EXCEPT THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1995 WHICH HAS 16
WEEKS.
<F2>INCLUDES TRADE RECEIVABLES ONLY.
<F3>INCLUDES AMOUNTS RELATED TO TRADE RECEIVABLES AND CURRENT NOTES RECEIVABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 1, 2010 

Order 

 

December 1, 2010 

140685(50)(51)(53)(54) 

CAROL DRAKE and CLELLEN BURY, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 SC: 140685 

v COA: 287502 

Berrien CC: 2008-000247-CE 

CITY OF BENTON HARBOR and HARBOR 

SHORES COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by the Boys & Girls Club(s) of Benton 

Harbor and the First Tee of Benton Harbor, by the Southwestern Michigan Tourist 

Council, by Ronald J. Taylor and by Saugatuck Dunes Coastal Alliance and others for 

leave to file briefs amicus curiae in this case are considered and they are granted.
RE: Revised Area Source Boiler Preamble and Rule Notes Link

Mary Johnson to

: Higgins, Cortney 12/20/2012 01:02 PM

Cc

: Jim Eddinger, RobertJ Wayland, Thomas Gillis, Jonathan Averback, Janet Eck, Peter Tsirigotis 

 

 

 

From: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

Cc: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, J

Averback/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Eck/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cortney, 

Attached per your e-mail below is the final clean version of the Area Source Boiler Preamble and Rule. 

Thanks, 

Mary 

NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060-AR14_122012.docx 

Mary Johnson 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Mail Code D 243-01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-5025 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim 

Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/20/2012 12:14 PM 

Subject: RE: Revised Area Source Boiler Preamble and Rule 

Hi Mary,

We have no further edits the area source rule.  Can you send me the final clean version?

  

Thanks,
Cortney

  

From: Johnson.Mary@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Johnson.Mary@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:11 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Gillis.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov; Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov; 

Mason.Keith@epamail.epa.gov; Averback.Jonathan@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Revised Area Source Boiler Preamble and Rule 

 

Cortney,

Attached is a redline version of the Area Source Boiler preamble/rule. It shows the changes made from 

the version sent to you on 12/17/2012.

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060-

AR14_Redline_121712_v_121912.docx)

Thanks.

Mary

Mary Johnson 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Mail Code D 243-01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-5025 

Fax: (919) 541-5450
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KUNXIN HE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71431

Agency No. A098-451-313

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 9, 2013** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Kunxin He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have

FILED

MAR 13 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
1

 Because the parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history

underlying this appeal, we do not recount them here. 

2 11-71431

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings. INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 & n.1 (1992). 

We deny the petition for review.1

He contends that he suffered past persecution because his church in China

was illegal and officials raided his church and arrested the preacher, who was He’s

father. The record does not compel the conclusion that He suffered past

persecution based on these experiences. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1017-

18, 1019-21 (9th Cir. 2006); Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1014-18 (9th Cir.

2003). 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that He failed to

demonstrate he had a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Gu, 454 F.3d at

1021-22; Molina–Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Because He failed to establish his eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed

to meet the higher standard of eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye

v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
CERTIFICATION 

**EXHIBIT 99.1**

February 14, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission  450 Fifth Street, N.W  Washington, D.C. 20549 

Ladies and Gentlemen:  The certification set forth below isbeing submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) accompanying this letter. 

Louis R. Tomasetta, the Chief Executive Officer and Eugene F. Hovanec,the Chief Financial Officer of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation, each certifies that: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation. 

|   |                   |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | /s/ LOUIS R. TOMASETTA |
|   |                   |  |
|   | **Name:**              | **Louis R. Tomasetta Chief Executive Officer** |
|   |                   |

 

|   |                  |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | /s/ EUGENE F. HOVANEC |
|   |                  |  |
|   | **Name:**             | **Eugene F. Hovanec  Chief Financial Officer** |
|   |                  |
CTR Performance Grants

file:///G|/
... 0pdf%20and%20put%20in%20FDMS/Appendix%208%20Commute%20Trip%20Reduction/CTR%20Performance%20Grants.htm [1/29/2010 2:30:02 PM] » King County Transit Trip Planner » Puget Sound Traffic Flow Map » RideshareOnline.com » Washington State Ferries

Enlarge

• TDM Success Stories

• PT&CO Staff
• Counties/Jurisdictions
• Puget Sound TDM
• Office of Transit

Mobility • CTR Task Force

• Services

• Rail
• Special Needs

Transportation • Office of Transit

Mobility • Transit • Public Transportation

Conference 

# CTR Performance Grants The Washington State Legislature created a trip reduction performance program in 2003 to encourage entrepreneurs, private companies, transit system, cities, and non-profit organizations to provide services to employees that result in fewer vehicle trips arriving at worksites. The new program fosters innovation by paying winning proposals for the trips they reduce and by reimbursing start-up costs—up to fifty percent of the awarded funds. Unlike many grant programs, however, the balance of amount awarded to each winning project will be distributed based on performance, as documented in surveys taken before and after the projects. 

### 2003–2005 projects under the CTR Performance Grant Program Overview of original program and results of 2004–2005 grants . This presentation was made at the Public Transportation and Rail Conference, August 2005.

Winners of round 1 , April 2004 Winners of round 2 , June 2004 

### Planning for 2005–2007 projects The trip reduction performance program has been funded at $1.5 M for the 2005–2007 biennium. Contingent on October 3–4 approval of new regulations, a modified program —to be called the CTR Trip Reduction Performance Program, or TRPP ——will move forward with a new call for proposals. TRPP projects will differ from the 2003–2005 grants awarded under the CTR Performance Grants Program. The modified program will allow for longer project timelines and more flexible processes for measuring performance. Information about the modified program will be available here soon. In the meantime, you may refer to materials documenting the redesign process. DRAFT schedule for the Trip Reduction Performance Program Date Event October 24–28 Training sessions November 18 Applications due January 4, 2006 Winnning projects announced
Questions about the Trip Reduction Performance Program ? Contact the Public Transportation and Commute Options Office.

Copyright WSDOT © 2006 Traffic & Roads | Site Index | Contact WSDOT | WSDOT Business | WSDOT Home
May 6, 2002

24044, 24045

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Why Should I Become Accredited in

the National Veterinary Accreditation

Program?

Last Modified: 

Print

The National Veterinary Accreditation Program (NVAP) gives accredited

veterinarians) opportunities to assist USDA in carrying out programs designed to

safeguard public and animal health.   

Most Important Benefits to the Accredited

Veterinarian

Enhanced professional knowledge with up-to-date information on animal health

and foreign animal diseases for all animals, food security, and regulatory issues

Continued acceptance of official work performed by AVs in international

markets

Ability to choose level of accreditation program participation and tailor

accredited activity to practice type

Notification of and ability to participate in State-Federal agricultural emergency

response efforts
Ability to receive supplemental training without cost

Opportunity to be a local resource for USDA information in the media

Increased marketability of remunerative services to clients

Remember:

Only AVs can prepare Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (CVIs) or "health

papers," in most cases, so animals can move across State or international

borders to participate, for example, in fairs and shows.

Only AVs may perform testing for government program diseases, such as

brucellosis and tuberculosis. Becoming accredited allows you to do these tests

and other disease control work for USDA.

In some States, only AVs can give rabies vaccines.

In the United States, AVs provide the front line in defending our country from

emerging and foreign animal diseases.

Contact Us

NVAP Coordinators

For questions about NVAP, contact your local NVAP Coordinator by selecting your

State or Territory from the dropdown menu below or visit More Information About

NVAP.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

All Contacts

Export requirements frequently change. Obtain current export requirements for live

animals or animal products before each shipment.
# C_2019139EN.01005101.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2019 — Serenity Pharmaceuticals v EUIPO — Gebro Holding (NOCUVANT)

(Case T-321/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark NOCUVANT - Earlier word marks NOCUTIL - Proof of genuine use - Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2019/C 139/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Serenity Pharmaceuticals LLC (Milford, Pennsylvania, United States) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gebro Holding GmbH (Fieberbrunn, Austria) (represented by: M. Konzett, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 March 2018 (Case R 584/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Gebro Holding and Allergan, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Serenity Pharmaceuticals LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Serenity Pharmaceuticals LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

---
1** COMPANY SANITIZED **2••** COMPANY SANITIZED **3Servers & Systems••** COMPANY SANITIZED **4** COMPANY SANITIZED **5** COMPANY SANITIZED **6** COMPANY SANITIZED **7( LL)n** COMPANY SANITIZED **
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26485]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, December 5, 2023--10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Meeting Matter

Briefing Matter

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: November 28, 2023.
Sarah Bock,
Paralegal Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2023-26485 Filed 11-28-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 272 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 272

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 19, 2015.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Emmer of Minnesota.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Mr. Donovan.
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. Donovan.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of *info*USA Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to myknowledge on the date hereof, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.Date: May 10, 2007       */s/ Vinod Gupta* Vinod Gupta,    Chief Executive Officer       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission asour exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form10-Q.
Exhibit 32


    Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                             Pursuant to Section 906
           of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

     The undersigned, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Chief
Financial Officer of InfoNow Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

     (a)  the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
          2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/ Harold R. Herbst
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Harold R. Herbst
                                            Interim Chief Executive Officer
                                            May 13, 2005


                                            /s/ James L. Medina
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            James L. Medina
                                            Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                            May 13, 2005
#### Grester Realty Corp., Appellant, *v.*Tru-Maid Hat Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 8, 1959.

*Leonard M. Henlcin*for appellant.

*David M. Engelson*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The tenant is concluded by the former judgment to the effect that there had been no eviction prior to June 30, 1957. Its action in removing from the premises 1 ‘ never to return” on or about June 13, 1957, in the circumstances, cannot give rise to a claim of actual or constructive eviction. The facts upon which its present defenses are bottomed, moreover, were determined adversely to the tenant in the prior proceeding.

The orders appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs, and the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Orders reversed, etc.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2057

___________ Fen Hao Chen, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., * Attorney General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: October 5, 2010 Filed: October 20, 2010

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Chinese citizen Fen Hao Chen petitions fo r review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his moti on to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Li Yun Lin v. Mukasey , 526 F.3d 1164, 1165-66 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________
03/2020 APHIS-Approved Mexican Poultry Processing Establishments 1-1

APHIS-Approved Mexican Poultry Processing Establishments

Establishment 

number: Name/address:

TIF Establishment 241 Productura de Bocados Carnicos S.A. de C.V. Monterrey 

TIF Establishment 636 TAOS Alimentos, S.A. De C.V., Col. Parque Industrial, Hermosillo Son. Mexico

TIF Establishment 483 Alimentos SBF de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. 
03/2020 APHIS-Approved Mexican Poultry Processing Establishments 1-1