Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices 86113 

12See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Final Service Rule). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

16We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

17See APO and Final Service Rule. 

If a timely summons is filed at the 

U.S. Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to interested parties within five days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice.12 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results of review.13 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

five days after the date for filing case 

briefs.14 Interested parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.15

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.16 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. An electronically 

filed hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice. 

Unless extended, we intend to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of the issues raised in the 

case briefs, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: November 30, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Diversification of China’s Economy 

VI. Use of Faces Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

VII. Subsidies Valuation Information 

VIII. Interest Rate, Discount Rate, Input, and 

Electricity Benchmarks 

IX. Analysis of Programs 

X. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Rescinded From Review 

1. Dalian Yonghseng Metal Structure Co., 

Ltd. d/b/a DYM Brewing Solutions 

2. Equipmentimes (Dalian) E-Commerce Co., 

Ltd. 

3. Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd. 

4. Jinan Chenji International Trade Co., Ltd. 

5. Jinan Chenji Machinery Equipment Co., 

Ltd. 

6. Jinan HaoLu Machinery Equipment Co., 

Ltd. 

7. Jinjiang Jiaxing Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

8. NDL Keg Qingdao Inc. 

9. Ningbo All In Brew Technology Co. 

10. Ningbo Bestfriends Beverage Containers 

Industry Co., Ltd. 

11. Ningbo Chance International Trade Co., 

Ltd 

12. Ningbo Direct Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

13. Ningbo Haishu Direct Import and Export 

Trade Co., Ltd. 

14. Ningbo Haishu Xiangsheng Metal Factory 

15. Ningbo Hefeng Container Manufacturer 

Co., Ltd. 

16. Ningbo Hefeng Kitchen Utensils 

Manufacture Co., Ltd. 

17. Ningbo HGM Food Machinery Co., Ltd. 

18. Ningbo Jiangbei Bei Fu Industry and 

Trade Co., Ltd. 

19. Ningbo Kegco International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

20. Ningbo Kegstorm Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. 

21. Ningbo Minke Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

22. Ningbo Sanfino Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

23. Ningbo Shimaotong International Co., 

Ltd. 

24. Ningbo Sunburst International Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

25. Orient Equipment (Taizhou) Co., Ltd. 

26. Penglai Jinfu Stainless Steel Products 

27. Pera Industry Shanghai Co., Ltd. 

28. Qingdao Henka Precision Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

29. Qingdao Xinhe Precision Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd. 

30. Rain Star International Trading Dalian 

Co., Ltd. 

31. Shandong Meto Beer Equipment Co., Ltd. 

32. Shandong Tiantai Beer Equipment Co., 

Ltd. 

33. Shandong Tonsen Equipment Co., Ltd. 

34. Shandong Yuesheng Beer Equipment Co., 

Ltd. 

35. Shenzhen Wellbom Technology Co., Ltd. 

36. Sino Dragon Group, Ltd. 

37. Wenzhou Deli Machinery Equipment Co. 

38. Wuxi Taihu Lamps and Lanterns Co., Ltd. 

39. Yantai Toptech Ltd. 

40. Yantai Trano New Material Co., Ltd., 

d/b/a Trano Keg, d/b/a SS Keg 

[FR Doc. 2023–27173 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–878] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd. 

(Dongkuk) and certain companies not 

selected for individual examination 

made sales of subject merchandise in 

the United States at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) July 1, 2021, through June 30, 

2022. In addition, Commerce 

determines that Hyundai Steel Company 

(Hyundai) did not make sales of subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below NV during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable December 12, 2023. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
86114 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2021– 

2022, 88 FR 48433 (July 27, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 

54468 (September 6, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 48433. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2021– 

2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 

Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, 

the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India 

and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

48390 (July 25, 2016) (Order). 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comments 1 and 2. 

7See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews 

in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 16. 

8Commerce initiated this review on Dongkuk 

Steel Mill Co., Ltd. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 

87 FR 54468 (September 6, 2022); however, 

Commerce recently concluded a changed 

circumstances review for Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., 

Ltd. finding that Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd. is 

its successor-in-interest moving forward. See 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review 88 FR 78723, 

dated November 16, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jaron Moore or William Horn, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3640 or (202) 482–4868, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 27, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2021–2022 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

corrosion-resistant steel products 

(CORE) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) and invited interested parties to 

comment.1 The administrative review 

covers eight exporters and/or producers 

of the subject merchandise,2 of which 

we selected Dongkuk and Hyundai as 

mandatory respondents.3 For a 

summary of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is CORE from Korea. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by parties in the case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues addressed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade/gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average dumping 

margin calculations for Dongkuk,6 as 

well as the preliminary weightedaverage dumping margin assigned to the 

companies not selected for individual 

examination. 

Rates for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

individual companies not selected for 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which we did not 

individually examine in an 

administrative review. Section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a 

preference to avoid using rates which 

are zero, de minimis, or based entirely 

on facts available (FA) in calculating an 

all-others rate. Accordingly, 

Commerce’s practice in administrative 

reviews has been to average the 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the companies selected for individual 

examination in the administrative 

review, excluding rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on FA.7 For 

these final results of review, we 

calculated a zero weighted-average 

dumping margin for Hyundai and a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Dongkuk that is not zero, de minimis, or 

based entirely on FA. Therefore, 

consistent with our practice, we have 

assigned the companies not selected for 

individual examination the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for 

Dongkuk. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the period July 1, 2021, through 

June 30, 2022: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd 8 0.53 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd ......... 0.53 

POSCO ....................................... 0.53 

POSCO International Corporation .......................................... 0.53 

POSCO STEELEON Co., Ltd .... 0.53 

SeAH Coated Metal .................... 0.53 

SeAH Steel Corporation ............. 0.53 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of the notice of final results 

in the Federal Register, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.212(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), because Dongkuk’s final 

margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.5 percent) and Dongkuk 

reported the entered value of its U.S. 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

sales. Where an importer-specific 

assessment rate is de minimis, the 

entries by that importer will be 

liquidated without regard to 

antidumping duties. Because the final 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Hyundai Steel Company is zero percent, 

we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices 86115 

9See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012). 

10See Order; see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice 

of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final 

Determination of Investigation and Notice of 

Amended Final Results, 83 FR 39054 (August 8, 

2018) (Timken and Amended Final Results). 

11For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

12See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

13See Order, as amended by Timken and 

Amended Final Results. 

the appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.9

Consistent with Commerce’s 

clarification of its assessment practice, 

for entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by the abovereferenced mandatory respondents for 

which they did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate those entries at the all-others 

rate in the original less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation (as amended) 10 if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.11

For the non-individually examined 

companies, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate all applicable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR at the rate 

listed in the table above. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.12

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of CORE from Korea entered, 

or withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results as 

provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: 

(1) the cash deposit rate for each 

specific company listed above will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

the review; (2) for merchandise exported 

by producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

completed segment of the proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate established in 

the completed segment for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review or the 

original LTFV investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the producer of the 

merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate 

for all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 8.31 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation (as amended) in this 

proceeding.13 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 6, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether to Correct Dongkuk’s 

General and Administrative and Interest 

Expense Calculations 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Correctly 

Matched Dongkuk’s Home Market and 

U.S. Sales by Manufacturer 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–27246 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Steel Import License 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, on or after the date of publication 

of this notice. We invite the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

comment on proposed, and continuing 

information collections, which helps us 

assess the impact of our information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. Public 

comments were previously requested 

via the Federal Register on October 6, 

2023, during a 60-day comment period. 

This notice allows for an additional 30 

days for public comments. 

Agency: International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

Title: Aluminum Import License. 

OMB Control Number: 0625–0279. 

Form Number(s): ITA–4142a (regular 

license); ITA–4142b (low-value license). 

Type of Request: Regular submission. 

Extension of a currently approved 

information collection. 

Number of Respondents: 4,000. 

Average Hours per Response: Less 

than 10.5 minutes. 

Burden Hours: 35,633 hours, 

including 525 burden hours for lowvalue licenses. 

Needs and Uses: In order to monitor 

aluminum imports in real-time and to 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1