T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E HU MB E R T O J AU R E GU I G U T I E R R E Z ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 07- 72641 07- 74329 A g en cy N o s. A 075- 523- 976

A 076- 715- 435 A 076- 715- 436 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n th e s e c o n s o lid a te dc a s e s , J o s e H u m b e rto J au r e g u i G u tie rr e z an dh is f a m i l y , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of P e ru, pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de r s de ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o r e ope n ba s e d upon i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l and de ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o r e c ons i de r . W e ha ve 

# FI LED SEP 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 72641 2 ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia ls o f m o tio n s to r e o p e n an dm o tio n s to r e c o n s id e r , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3d 785, 791 ( 9th C i r . 2005) , and w e d e n yth e p e titio n s f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re o p en b ec au se th e m o ti o n w as filedm o re th an fo u r y ea rs af ter th e B IA ’s D e c e m b e r5 , 2 0 0 2 , o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , an dp e titio n e r s f a ile dto de m ons tr a t e tha tthe ya c t e d w i th the due di l i ge nc e r e qui r e d f ore qui t abl e t ol l i ng, s e e I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 897 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( e qui t abl e t ol l i ng a va i l abl e “ w he n ape t i t i one ri s pr e ve nt e d f r om f i l i ng be c aus e of

de c e pt i on, f

r aud, o re rr o r , a s lo n g a s th e p e titio n e ra c ts w ith du e d ilig e n c e ” ) ; se e al so Si ng h v. G on zales , 49 1 F . 3d 10 90 , 10 96 -97 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). T h e B I A a ls o d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e c ons i de rbe c aus e pe t i t i one r s f a i l e d t o i de nt i f

yanye rr orof

f a c torl aw i n the B I A ’s Ju n e 1 , 2 0 0 7 , o r d e r . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; So c o p - G o n z a lezv . I

NS , 2 7 2 F .3 d1 1 7 6 , 1 1 8 0 n .2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( e n b an c ) . P e titio n e r s ’ c o n te n tio n s th a t th e B I A f a ile dto a d e q u a te lya d d r e s s th e ir ar gum e nt s and appl i e d an i nc orr e c tl e ga l s t andar d ar e uns upport e d bythe r e c or d. P E T I T I ON S F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.