alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,102,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  370,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,472,973
<PP&E>                                      50,631,214
<DEPRECIATION>                              43,339,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,765,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,459
<BONDS>                                      2,677,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,840,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,765,106
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,335,253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,829,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             268,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,762,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,762,752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,762,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott D. Howarth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/    Scott D. HowarthScott D. HowarthPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 13, 2010


I, John M. Cobb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc.



By:

/s/    John M. CobbJohn M. CobbVice President and Chief Financial OfficerDecember 13, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the Fund) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Kenneth I. Denos   
|                       |  | Kenneth I. Denos       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 384 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 384

              Calling for a formal end of the Korean War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2015

  Mr. Rangel (for himself, Mr. Conyers, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
   on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' 
Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Calling for a formal end of the Korean War.

Whereas the Korean War broke out on June 25, 1950, and active combat ceased with 
        the Armistice Agreement signed on July 27, 1953;
Whereas the Armistice Agreement did not formally end the war, so the Korean War 
        remains one of the world's longest ongoing armed conflicts;
Whereas the Korean War was a global conflict that involved not only South Korea 
        and North Korea, but also the United States along with more than 20 
        other nations, which altogether suffered hundreds of thousands 
        casualties and losses, including millions of civilians killed and 
        wounded;
Whereas 2015 marks the 70th anniversary of Korea's independence after Imperial 
        Japan surrendered to the United States during World War II on August 15, 
        1945; and
Whereas peaceful unification of Korea is desired by all Korean people: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) pays tribute to the sacrifices of the Veterans of the 
        Korean War, its victims and divided families; and
            (2) calls upon the international community to support the 
        vision of a unified Korea and assist efforts to promote 
        international peace and security, denuclearization, economic 
        prosperity, human rights, and the rule of law both on the 
        Korean Peninsula and elsewhere.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 397 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding preserving 

the rights of employers and employees regarding coverage through association health plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER (for herself, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, and Mr. 

NEWHOUSE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding preserving the rights of employers and employees 

regarding coverage through association health plans. 

Whereas for decades association health plans have provided 

employers and employees with access to high-quality, affordable coverage; 

Whereas this coverage should be preserved as it meets the 

goal of ensuring access to quality, affordable health care; 

and 

Whereas the Affordable Care Act should not be interpreted 

by the Federal Government and State governments in a 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 397 IH 

way that destroys health insurance markets: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the Federal Government and State govern4 ments should carry out the law in a way that pre5 serves the rights of employers and employees to 

6 maintain health insurance coverage through associa7 tion health plans; and 

8 (2) the Affordable Care Act should not be con9 strued to supersede State law that establishes, im10 plements, or continues in effect any standard or re11 quirement solely relating to health insurance issuers 

12 in connection with association health plans except to 

13 the extent that such standard or requirement pre14 vents the application of an explicit requirement of 

15 Federal law. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
January 30, 2004

23106

#### Karagianes v. State

Affirmed
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it 

displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is 

estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and 

completing and reviewing the collection of information.

OMB Approved

0579-0013 

EXP: 02/2022

This report is required to determine if tests conducted on each serial and each subserial are satisfactory prior to release of the serial or subserial (9 CFR 116)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE

VETERINARY BIOLOGICS PRODUCTION AND TEST REPORT

NOTE: Submit an original and one copy for every serial or subserial which reaches any stage 

of identification and testing.

1. PAGE

OF

2. LICENSE OR PERMIT NUMBER

3. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF LICENSEE OR PERMITTEE (Include ZIP code) 4. FILL DATE 5. PRODUCT CODE NUMBER

6. EXPIRATION DATE 7. SERIAL OR SUBSERIAL NUMBER

8. TRUE NAME OF PRODUCT

9. TEST DATA (For additional test data use VS Form 2008A)

TEST

REFERENCE

(A)

TEST DATES

RESULTS

(D)

INSERT CODE

S - SATISFACTORY U - UNSATISFACTORY

I - INCONCLUSIVE NT - NO TEST 

 (E)

STARTED

(B)

CONCLUDED

(C)

10. INVENTORY FOR RELEASE (Use a separate line for each size container) 11. REMARKS

NO. OF

CONTAINERS

(A)

CONTAINER SIZE (DOSES,

ML OR UNITS)

(B)

TOTAL DOSES,

ML OR UNITS

(C)

TOTAL TOTAL

12. DISPOSITION BY FIRM ELIGIBLE FOR RELEASE DESTROYED TO BE REPROCESSED AND RETESTED

 OTHER (Explain)

13. SIGNATURE (Authorized Firm Representative) 14. TITLE 15. DATE

16. DISPOSITION BY APHIS NOT TO BE TESTED TESTS COMPLETED, SATISFACTORY

 TESTS COMPLETED, UNSATISFACTORY (Explain) OTHER (Explain)

17. SIGNATURE (Authorized APHIS Representative) 18. TITLE 19. DATE

APHIS FORM 2008 Previous editions are obsolete.

APR 2015
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos 333-46417 and 333-61161) of Landmark Systems
Corporation of our report dated February 29, 2000, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, appearing in Landmark Systems Corporation's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 29, 2000, relating to
the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC

McLean, Virginia
March 29, 2000


                                      -54-
Exhibit 32.2

                           Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 14, 2005                                 /s/ Robert I. Webber
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Robert I. Webber
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Eusebio Kino Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Suzanne Silvercruys

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1965

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Visitor Center

This statue of Eusebio Kino was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Arizona in 1965.

A man of many talents, Eusebio Kino was born on August 10, 1645, in Segno, Italy, a small town in the Tyrolese Alps. After recuperating from a serious illness, Kino joined the Society of Jesus in 1665. Although he wanted to go to the Orient, his orders gave him the choice of Spain or Mexico. After drawing his lot, Father Kino set out for Mexico in 1678. Four years later, as the head of a Jesuit mission, he led the Atondo expedition to lower California. After a drought in 1685, Kino was forced back to Mexico City.

In 1687, he journeyed to southern Arizona to work with the Pimas. Especially adept in mathematics and geography, he was one of the first scientific explorers, cartographers, astronomers, historians, builders, and ranchmen of the Pimera Alta. Due to his efforts, missions and stockyards were developed. Roads were built to connect previously inaccessible areas. His many expeditions on horseback covered over 50,000 square miles, during which he mapped an area 200 miles long and 250 miles wide, and deduced that California was a peninsula.

He built missions extending from the interior of Sonora 150 miles northeast to San Xavier del Bac. He constructed 19 rancheras, which supplied cattle to new settlements. He was also instrumental in the return of the Jesuits to California in 1697. Father Kino remained in southern Arizona until his death in 1711. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

444444444444444 NO. 03-05-00250- CV 444444444444444 Fr ank K r ue mm e l, App e lla nt

v. Top S olution s, Inc. , Appellee

44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 250TH J UDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. GN500937 , HONO RABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, J UDGE PRESIDING 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant F r ank K

r uemmel filed an uno pp os e d mo tio n to dis mis s th is a pp e a l. Acc ording ly , we g rant the motion to dismis s this appeal. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ury ear and Pember

ton Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Jul y

25, 2005
# C_2016203EN.01002201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/22

---

Article 46

1.   Every project for establishing a Joint Undertaking, whether originating from the Commission, a Member State or any other quarter, shall be the subject of an inquiry by the Commission.

For this purpose, the Commission shall obtain the views of Member States and of any public or private body which in its opinion can usefully advise it.

2.   The Commission shall forward to the Council any project for establishing a Joint Undertaking, together with its reasoned opinion.

If the Commission delivers a favourable opinion on the need for the proposed Joint Undertaking, it shall submit proposals to the Council concerning:

| (a) | location; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

location;

| (b) | statutes; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

statutes;

| (c) | the scale of and timetable for financing; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the scale of and timetable for financing;

| (d) | possible participation by the Community in the financing of the Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

possible participation by the Community in the financing of the Joint Undertaking;

| (e) | possible participation by a third State, an international organisation or a national of a third State in the financing or management of the Joint Undertaking; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

possible participation by a third State, an international organisation or a national of a third State in the financing or management of the Joint Undertaking;

| (f) | the conferring of any or all of the advantages listed in Annex III to this Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

the conferring of any or all of the advantages listed in Annex III to this Treaty.

The Commission shall attach a detailed report on the project as a whole.

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We have issued our report dated November 1, 2003 (except for Note 10 as
to which the date is December 23, 2003), accompanying the financial statements
included in the Annual Report of XATA Corporation on Form 10-KSB, for the year
ended September 30, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said report in the Registration Statements of XATA Corporation on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-85584, 333-59214, 333-28337, 333-03670, 33-94006, 33-89222 and
33-74148) and Form S-3 and amendments (File No. 333-82905).

                                                          /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 23, 2003
17606

#### Lum v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

December 5, 1996

Order No. 96-33

Affirmed
20057

#### Silva v. Hawaii County Police

Affirmed
## MajorInstruments and Agreements

on SantaMonica AirportLand (prepared by LAADO
- August 2007

Date Instrument Action August 10, Instrument of Surrendered leasehold interest inland and conveyed easements and 1948 Transfer improvements April 6, 1949 Quitclaim Deed Conveyed 21 acres to City without usual restrictions, conditions, etc. April 25, 1952 Release Released Lot A ofGeorge Tract from all conditions, restrictions, etc., ofInstrument ofTransfer dated August 10, 1948. September 15, Release The April 25, 1952 release was amended to include provision to 1952 protect airport activities. Grants permission to abandon Runway No. I and releases obligation
o operate and maintain the runway foruse and benefit ofpublic. March 5, 1956 Release Released Runway No. 1only from the terms, covenants, conditions, eservations, and restrictions set forth inInstrument ofTransfer dated ~u~st 10, 1948. Consents to use substantial portion ofarea located in southeast section ofthe airport for uses compatible with airport operations to provide expanded employment and revenue and increased parkland for the city. January 31, Settlement 1984 Agreement Consents to use ofland designated asparkland and residual land therein for other than airport purposes, releases the City and this parkland and residual land from all conditions, covenants, and estrictions imposed by the Instrument ofTransfer dated August 10, 1948.



### EXHIBIT 

# i~/Y1·ra
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60306

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT W. COLLUMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:00-CR-116-WS

--------------------

October 25, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert W. Collums appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a

firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that

the district court erred in increasing his offense level by two

points for obstruction of justice. After conducting a hearing,

the district court found that Collums looked at Officer Slade

Moore, the arresting officer, and stated, “I will see you again.” 

The district court also found that as Collums turned a corner

going toward the door of the courtroom, he said, “son of a
No. 01-60306 

-2-

bitch.” Collums has not shown that the district court clearly

erred in determining that Collums’ statement to Officer Moore was

a veiled threat which warranted a two-level increase in his

offense level for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 3C1.1. See § 3C1.1, comment. (n.4(a)); see also United States

v. Graves, 5 F.3d 1546, 1555 (5th Cir. 1993).

Collums argues that the district court erred in denying a

two-point reduction in his offense level for acceptance of

responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Because Collums’

statements indicated he had not shown remorse or accepted

responsibility for his criminal behavior, the district court did

not err in denying a reduction in his offense level for

acceptance of responsibility. See § 3E1.1, comment. (n.4); see

also United States v. Lujan-Sauceda, 187 F.3d 451, 452 (5th Cir.

1999).

AFFIRMED.