alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ UBICOMM, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION, BULBS.COM INCORPORATED, DICK'S SPORTING GOODS INC., GNC HOLDINGS INC., EBAY INC., SMARTPAK EQUINE LLC, THINKGEEK INC., V. F. CORPORATION, ZAPPOS IP, INC., WAL - MART STORES, INC., NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., AND CROCS INC., Defendant s- Appellees.

______________________ 2014 - 1092, - 1099, - 1100, - 1101, - 1102, - 1103, - 1104, - 1105,

- 1106, - 1217, - 1245, - 1249

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:13 - cv - 00869 - RGA, 1:13 -cv00872 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 00874 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 00876 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 01019 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 01022 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 01024 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 01026 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 01029 - RGA, 1:13 - cv 01876 - RGA, 1:13 - cv - 00882 - RGA, and 1:13 - cv - 00873 - RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Case: 14-1092 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 07/31/2014UBICOMM , LLC v. ACE HARDWARE CORPORA TION 2 UBICOMM, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BLUE RIBBON MOTORING , LLC AND WILLIAM SSONOMA, INC ., Defendants - Appellees.

______________________ 2014 - 1359

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in Nos. 3:13 - cv - 01361 -HBGS , 3:13 - cv - 01362 -H- BGS , and 3:13 - cv - 01363 -H- BGS , Judge Marilyn L. Huff .

______________________ O R D E R Upon consideration of the joint motion to withdraw the above - captioned appeals, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeals are dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. F OR THE C OURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s19 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 31, 2014 Case: 14-1092 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 07/31/2014
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Joel P. Moskowitz, Chief Executive Officer of
Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 17, 2006



/s/ JOEL P. MOSKOWITZJoel P. MoskowitzChief Executive Officer
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard -Baltimore MD 21230 

MDE 410-537-3000 - 1-800-633-6101 

Martin O'Malley 

Governor 

Shari T. Wilson 

Secretary 

Anthony G. Brown 

Lieutenant Governor 

Robert M. Summers , Ph.D. 

Deputy Secretary 

July 31, 2009 

Mr. William C. Ear

Acting Regional A

U.S. Environment

Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 

ly 

dministrator (3RAOO) 

al Protection Agency 

19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Early: 

The purpose of this letter is to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

# 09-03 concerning Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) federal requirements. This 

SIP revision does the following: 

(1)	 updates the adoption of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) federal requirements found under 40 

CFR Part 52.21 to include the changes in the July 1, 2008 edition of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR); and 

(2)	 clarifies the meaning of the terms "Administrator" and "Reviewing Authority" as 

used in 40 CFR Parts 52.21 and 52.1116. 

This SIP submittal includes amendments to Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.01 General 

Administrative Provisions and Regulation .14 under COMAR 26.11.06 General Emission 

Standards, Prohibitions , and Restrictions. 

The Notice of Proposed Action for this SIP Revision was published in the Maryland Register on 

April 24, 2009 . A public hearing was held on May 28, 2009 . The amendments were adopted on 

June 11, 2009 . The Notice of Final Action was published on July 6, 2009 and the amendments 

became effective on July 16, 2009 . All administrative procedures were properly fol lowed 

throughout the adoption process. 

If you have any questions concerning this SIP submittal, please fee l free to call me at (410) 537­

3084 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn , Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management 

Administration, at (410) 537-3255 . 

Sin IY,

~t 
 Secretary 

STW:dhr 

Enclosures 

Recycled Paper www.mde.Slalc.md.lIs TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

I n the interest of D.S

. , J.S ., and * From the 29 th District Court

I.S. , children, of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. C48326

.

No. 1 1

- 1 9

- 00 324

- CV * February 13 , 20 20

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey

, C. J.,

Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Bring a Pet Rodent into the United

States

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS Veterinary Services does not have any animal health requirements related to

bringing (importing) a pet rodent into the United States from a foreign country. See

below to view other requirements for bringing pet rodents into the United States

from another country.
Other Federal Agency Requirements

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention prohibits the import of any rodent of

African origin. This includes any rodents that were caught in Africa and then shipped

directly to the United States or those shipped to other countries before being

imported to the United States. The ban also applies to rodents whose native habitat

is in Africa, even if those rodents were born elsewhere.

Check with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as it may also have regulations related

to importing a rodent into the United States.

U.S. State and Territory Requirements

Domestic movement requirements are set by the receiving State or Territory.

Visit the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture to find your

destination's agriculture department and check its website for requirements.

For questions or clarification on any of the requirements, contact the State or

Territorial veterinarian's office.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Sweet Orange Scab

Last Modified: 

Print

Sweet orange scab is caused by the fungus Elsinöe australis. Many citrus species

and hybrids are vulnerable. Infection causes scab pustules that give fruit a corky

appearance. Sweet orange scab can stunt young nursery trees or new field plantings

and cause premature fruit to drop.
E. australis is spread by rain, irrigation, and the movement of infected plants. The

fungal damage is superficial. It does not impact fruit quality and poses no danger to

people, but the blemishes reduce marketability. In the United States, sweet orange

scab was first detected in 2010 in residential citrus trees in Texas. It has since been

confirmed in Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi. 

What To Look For

Sweet orange scab symptoms may be confused with other diseases, like citrus

canker, or with environmental injuries. Symptoms may also vary by region due to

differences in environmental conditions, like humidity.

Here are general symptoms to look for:

Fruit and stems

Scab-like lesions appear on young fruit. They are slightly raised and pink

to light brown in color. (Lesions on orange and grapefruit are sometimes

flatter.) As they expand, the lesions become cracked or warty and change

to a yellowish-brown to dark gray color. Scabs are usually dispersed in the

same pattern as water being splashed on fruit.

Leaves

Lesions begin on leaves as water-soaked spots which evolve into pustules.

Typically, lesions are found on the underside of leaves near the mid-vein

or border. Lesions on young tissue are usually raised, while lesions on

mature tissue are usually flatter. Infected leaves can become irregularly

shaped, stunted, or puckered.

View images of sweet orange scab.

Note: Sweet orange scab can be easily confused with other diseases, including citrus

canker. For a positive identification, reference our Field Guide for Sweet Orange

Scab.

How To Prevent This Disease
Don't move citrus trees. This is the fastest way sweet orange scab and other

citrus diseases spread.

Inspect your citrus trees regularly for infection.

How It Is Treated

There is no cure or treatment for sweet orange scab.

Report Signs of Citrus Disease

If you think you've seen signs of this disease or pest, immediately report it by

completing our online form.

Report Form (English)

Report Form (Spanish)

Controlling Sweet Orange Scab

Current Status

Sweet orange scab is found in Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Louisiana,

Mississippi, and Texas.

Table of Federal Quarantine Descriptions

Interactive Citrus Federal Quarantine Map

Regulatory Information

Regulated Articles Federal Order Table

APHIS-Approved Packing House Procedures for Sweet Orange Scab

APHIS-Approved Fungicides for Elsinoë australis, Causal Agent of Sweet Orange

Scab (SOS), For Use in Plant Nurseries
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Chattem,
Inc.'s audited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                     27,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,038
<PP&E>                                          45,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,625
<BONDS>                                        358,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,021
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   491,624
<SALES>                                        298,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               298,142
<CGS>                                           75,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,667
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,385
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,156
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.01


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan F. McIlroy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton
Superior Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ending December
     31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)) and

     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: March 31, 2003


                                      /s/ Alan F. McIlroy
                                      Alan F. McIlroy
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Dayton Superior Corporation and will be retained by Dayton Superior
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2018392EN.01000201.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/2

---

Appeal brought on 21 February 2018 by El Corte Inglés SA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 December 2017 in Case T-212/16: El Corte Inglés v EUIPO

(Case C-150/18 P)

(2018/C 392/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: El Corte Inglés SA (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Elho Business & Sport Vertriebs GmbH

By order of 6 September 2018 the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 23, 2021

b0420

Order 

Clerk

April 23, 2021

161262 

JODY POHLMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161262

COA: 344121

Oakland CC: 2017-853588-DO

JAMES G. POHLMAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On November 25, 2020, the Court ordered oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the January 30, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In light of the appellee’s decision 

not to contest the appellant’s application for leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the 

Oakland Circuit Court and DIRECT that court to conduct an evidentiary hearing within 56 

days of the date of this order. The hearing shall focus on, and the circuit court shall make 

factual findings as to, the appellant’s allegation that her signature on the parties’ January 

31, 2018 settlement agreement was involuntary because: (1) it was obtained under duress, 

and (2) it was obtained without the mandatory domestic violence screening required by 

MCL 600.1035(2) and (3) and MCR 3.216(H)(2). We further ORDER the circuit court to 

submit a transcript of the hearing, together with its findings, to the Clerk of this Court, 

within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

We retain jurisdiction.
Annex 15

CHAPTER 8.18.INFECTION WITH *TRICHINELLA* SPP.

**Article 8.18.1.**

General provisions

Trichinellosis is a widely distributed zoonosis caused by eating raw or undercooked *meat* from *Trichinella* infected food-producing animals or *wildlife*. Given that clinical signs of trichinellosis are not generally recognised in animals, the importance of trichinellosis lies exclusively in the *risk* posed to humans and costs of control in *slaughter* populations.

~~The~~While the adult parasite and the larval forms live in the small intestine,~~and~~the L1 larval stage also lives in the muscles ~~(respectively)~~ of many mammalian, avian and reptile host species.~~Within the genus *Trichinella*, twelve genotypes have been identified, nine of which have been designated as species. There is geographical variation amongst the genotypes.~~

Prevention of *infection* in susceptible species of domestic animals intended for human consumption relies on the prevention of exposure of those animals to the *meat* and *meat products* of *Trichinella* infected animals. This includes consumption of food waste of domestic animal origin, rodents and *wildlife*.

*Meat* and *meat products* derived from *wildlife* should be considered a potential source of *infection* for humans. Therefore, untested *meat* and *meat products* of *wildlife* may pose a public health *risk*.

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, *infection* with *Trichinella* spp. is defined as an *infection* of suids or equids by parasites of the genus *Trichinella*.

This chapter provides recommendations for on-farm prevention of *Trichinella infection* in domestic pigs *(Sus scrofa domesticus)*, and safe trade of *meat* and *meat products* derived from suids and equids. This chapter should be read in conjunction with the Codex Alimentarius Code of Hygienic Practice for Meat (CAC/RCP 58-2005) and Guidelines for the control of *Trichinella* spp. in meat of Suidae (CAC/GL 86-2015).

~~Methods for the detection of *Trichinella**infection* in pigs and other animal species include direct demonstration of *Trichinella* larvae in muscle samples. Demonstration of the presence of *Trichinella*-specific circulating antibodies using a validated serological test may be useful for epidemiological purposes.~~

When authorizing the import or transit of the *commodities* covered in this chapter, with the exception of those listed in Article 8.18.2., *Veterinary Authorities* should apply the recommendations in this chapter.

Standards for ~~diagnostic tests~~diagnosis and information on the epidemiology are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*.

[...]

___________________________

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2024	1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MARIA ROBLEDO MEZA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72251

Agency No. A037-732-564

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Maria Robledo Meza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional claims, Khan v. Holder, 584

FILED

NOV 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72251

F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 2009), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition

for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of relief

under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(c) (repealed 1996). See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii); Vargas-Hernandez v.

Gonzales, 497 F.3d 919, 923 (9th Cir. 2007). 

Robledo Meza’s contention that the IJ refused to allow Robledo Meza and

his witnesses to testify is not supported by the record. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d

1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to establish a due process violation).

Robledo Meza’s substantive due process claim fails because he has not

alleged the precise terms of any promise made to him by the government. See

Morgan v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 1084, 1091 (9th Cir. 2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
20675

#### State v. Dedrick

Affirmed
United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

WS Directive ass sso

MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES

PURPOSE

To provide guidance regarding the authority to attend meetings
and conferences.

REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

This directive replaces WS Directive 4.305 dated 10/11/12.

POLICY

a. Scheduling. Scheduling authority for meetings and conferences
will be delegated to the highest administrative level directly
affected by the meeting in question. The procedures and required
forms must be completed as instructed on the APHIS Travel Website
at
http://inside.aphis.usda.gov/mrpbs/travel/downloads/MRP_Interim_P
rocedures_on_Conference_Approvals.pdf

b. Approval. Any required approval forms can be obtained from a
Program Federal Agency Travel Administrator (FATA) .

c. Participation at Conferences and Meetings. WS employees are
encouraged to actively participate in their professional
organizations, societies, meetings, and activities for the
overall benefit of APHIS, to enhance their professionalism, to
increase their knowledge and skills, and to present technical and
scientific information.

Employees are encouraged to attend meetings related to APHIS/WS
functions or activities which will contribute to improved
operation, supervision, or management of Agency programs.

When several employees want to attend the same meeting, full and
careful consideration will be given by Directors and State
Directors to balance cumulative costs with anticipated benefits.

REFERENCES

Federal Travel Regulations: http: //www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104790

Agricultural Travel Regulations:
http: //inside.aphis.usda.gov/mrpbs/travel/downloads/ATRSDM2300_001.pdf

APHIS Travel Website:


http: //inside.aphis.usda.gov/mrpbs/travel/downloads/MRP_ Interim P
rocedures on Conference Approvals.pdf

Travel Services Website:
http://inside.aphis.usda.gov/mrpbs/travel.shtml

Aitertcap Dt

Deputy Administrator