alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(A)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert F. Doman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 7, 2007                    /s/ Robert F. Doman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert F. Doman
                                        President and  Chief Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       48
Exhibit 10.42
 FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 FIRST AMENDMENT
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 E.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore,
 1. Definitions.




---



##### 



2. Amendments
to the Loan Agreement.
 2.1 Section 5 of the Schedule (Tangible Net Worth)
 Tangible Net Worth (Minimum Tangible Net Worth) March 31, 2008
  Tangible Net Worth (Minimum Tangible Net Worth)
 2.2 Section 2 of the Schedule (Interest Reset)
 2.3 Section 1 of the Schedule (Adjusted Quick Ratio) Adjusted Quick Ratio




---



##### 



3. Borrower Representations, Warranties and Covenants.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
 (g)
 (h)




---



##### 



4. Limitation.
 5. Effectiveness.
 5.1 No Default Under Senior Loan Agreement
 5.2 Authorization, Execution and Delivery
 5.3 Senior Loan Amendment
 5.4 Payment of PFG Expenses
 6. Counterparts.




---



##### 



7. Integration; Construction.
 8. Governing Law; Venue.
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]




---



##### 



Borrower:

    
    
    
    PFG:XATA CORPORATION

    
    
    
    PARTNERS FOR GROWTH II, L.P.By

    
    /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
    
    
    
    ByPresident or Vice PresidentBy

    

/s/
[ILLEGIBLE]
    
    
    
    Name:Secretary or Asst SecretaryTitle:

    Manager, Partners for Growth II, LLCIts General PartnerBorrower:GEOLOGIC SOLUTIONS, INC.By

    
    /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

President or Vice PresidentBy

    
    /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

Secretary or Asst Secretary
 Signature Page First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement
23 P.3d 742

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Hall v. Hall

22878

03/12/2001

Granted
26588

#### Young v. State

Affirmed
#### Norman Brickman, Doing Business as D. Brickman Menands Market, Plaintiff, *v.*Niagara Fruit Co., Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

January 15, 1971.

*Gogan, Brickman é Goodwin (Martin Brickman*of counsel), for plaintiff. *Olson, Sanford, Matt é Forner (Donald G. Matt*of counsel), for defendant.

Edward S. Conway, J.

The plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to CPLB 3213 on the ground that there is no defense to the cause of action alleged in the moving papers.

The summons was accompanied by a notice of motion, supported by an affidavit of the plaintiff, stating that suit was brought to recover a debt in the amount of $7,944 on an account stated between plaintiff and defendant for goods sold defendant by the plaintiff between April 25, 1970 and October 23, 1970; and that since October 23, 1970 there has been no payment on the account, leaving a balance due of $7,944. A copy of the accounts due is attached to the affidavit. The affidavit further alleges a demand for payment of the balance due which was rendered on September 25, 1970 by being mailed to defendant. This was retained by defendant without objection, either as to the quality of the merchandise or the amount of the account.

The relevant portion of CPLB 3213 reads as follows: *“*When an action is based upon an instrument for the payment of money only or upon any judgment, the plaintiff may serve with the summons a notice of motion for summary judgment and the supporting papers in lieu of a complaint. The summons served with such motion papers shall require the defendant to submit answering papers on the motion within the time provided in the notice of motion.”

The supporting papers submitted by the plaintiff allege facts which are sufficient to constitute an account stated in writing. *484The moving party alleges that the account was rendered and retained without objection for a reasonable length of time by the defendant. *(Newburger-Morris Co.*v. *Talcott,*219 N. Y. 505; *Bailey*v. *Robinson Mfg. Co.,*60 N. Y. S. 2d 225, affd. 270 App. Div. 986.) Defendant in his opposing papers fails to deny the allegations of the plaintiff, but opposes the motion strictly as a matter of law.

It is the opinion of this court that an account stated in writing constitutes an instrument for the payment of money only within the contemplation of CPLR 3213. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for a summary judgment is granted.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2777EM

_____________

Ray Davis, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Jay Angoff, Director, Missouri * District Court for the Eastern

Department of Insurance, Individually; * District of Missouri.

Mark Stahlhuth, General Counsel, *

Department of Insurance, Individually; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Joseph R. McMahon, Assistant General *

Counsel, Missouri Department of *

Insurance, Individually, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: February 12, 1999

Filed: February 19, 1999

_____________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Ray Davis appeals the district court's adverse summary judgment ruling

granting qualified immunity to the parties sued by Davis. Having reviewed the record

in the context of Davis's contentions, we conclude that no error of law appears in the

district court's ruling. Because the parties' briefs show they are thoroughly familiar
-2-

with the issues before the court in this fact-intensive case, we conclude that an

extensive discussion would serve no useful precedential value. We also decline to

consider arguments Davis raises for the first time on appeal. We thus affirm on the

basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|November 19, 2004 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Hockey Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Desrosiers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 11, 2004



                                           THE HOCKEY COMPANY


                                       By:     /s/ Robert Desrosiers
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Desrosiers
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Vice
                                           President, Finance and Administration
# :H:ON'D.A

March 19,2009 Amerloan Honda Motor Co., Ino. 1919 Torrance Boulevard Torrance, CA 90501-2746 Phone (310) 783-2000

The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: On behalfofAmerican Honda Motor Co., Inc, I am writing to express our strong support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda_ Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefitfor our region, where our corporation has a strong trade and market connection with Japan. With daily service between Columbus Ohio and Detroit MetroAirport, our business could benefitfrom efficient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport. Ourtravelers would benefitfrom the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Detroit is a proven and successful gatewaytoAsia, and is an airportthat can support trans-pacific routes. This summer, Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTWto make itthe airline's gateway to Asia. The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis reque
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,975
<SECURITIES>                                     7,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,496
<INVENTORY>                                     29,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,121
<PP&E>                                          23,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,831
<SALES>                                         83,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,309
<CGS>                                           66,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,511)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)


</TABLE>
18293

#### Meyer v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.

Affirmed
911 P.2d 132

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Chang

16878

11/13/95

Affirmed
Annex 24. Item 6.13. – Article 10.11.2. of Chapter 10.11. Infection with tilapia lake virus

CHAPTER 10.11.

INFECTION WITH TILAPIA LAKE VIRUS

[...]

Article 10.11.2.

Scope

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.:  ~~[~~blue-Nile tilapia hybrid (*Oreochromis aureus* x *Oreochromis niloticus*), mango tilapia (*Sarotherodon galilaeus*), Mozambique tilapia (*Oreochromis mossambicus*), Nile tilapia (*Oreochromis niloticus*) and red hybrid tilapia (*Oreochromis niloticus* x *Oreochromis mossambicus*)~~blue tilapia (*Oreochromis aureus*), Malaysian red hybrid tilapia (*Oreochromis niloticus* x *Oreochromis mossambicus*), Mango tilapia (*Sarotherodon galilaeus*), Mozambique tilapia (*Oreochromis mossambicus*), Nile tilapia (*Oreochromis niloticus*), redbelly tilapia (*Tilapia zilli*), tinfoil barb (*Barbonymus schwanenfeldii*), Tvarnun simon (*Tristramella simonis*) and blue-nile tilapia hybrid (*Oreochromis niloticus* X *Oreochromis aureus*)] (under study)~~.

[...]

____________
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Municipal Securities Purchase, Inc.
(the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"report"), we, LeAnn Rogers and Peter Graham, Chairman and Vice President and
Treasurer, respectively, of the registrant, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     registrant.




OCTOBER 24, 2005

/s/ LeAnn Rogers
----------------
LeAnn Rogers
Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ Peter Graham
----------------
Peter Graham
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Pizarro Going to Peru
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Constantino Brumidi

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

The Spanish conqueror of Peru, Francisco Pizarro, leading his horse, pushes through the jungle searching for El Dorado, the mythical land of gold. Pizarro eventually captured the Inca capital, Cuzco. (1533)

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2020054EN.01004702.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Wehrheim v ECB

(Case T-100/18) (1)

(Civil service - ECB staff - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Discontinuation - Liability - Material and non-material harm - Service-related fault)

(2020/C 54/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Christine Wehrheim (Offenbach, Germany) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and A. Andrzejewska, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the error made by the ECB in the determination of her pecuniary rights at the time of her recruitment resulting in the grant of an expatriation allowance, which was subsequently discontinued.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the European Central Bank (ECB) to pay the sum of EUR 1 000 to Ms Christine Wehrheim in respect of non-material damage, together with interest, from the date of delivery of the present judgment, at the rate applied by the ECB to its main refinancing operations, increased by 3.5 percentage points, until the date of payment by the ECB of the amount of EUR 1 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Central Bank (ECB) to pay the sum of EUR 1 000 to Ms Christine Wehrheim in respect of non-material damage, together with interest, from the date of delivery of the present judgment, at the rate applied by the ECB to its main refinancing operations, increased by 3.5 percentage points, until the date of payment by the ECB of the amount of EUR 1 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Ms Wehrheim and the ECB to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ms Wehrheim and the ECB to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
# C_2019155EN.01001602.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/16

---

Action brought on 8 October 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-631/18)

(2019/C 155/21)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: T. Scharf, B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by having failed to adopt (all) the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 of 7 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, or by having failed to notify the Commission that it has adopted such provisions, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of that directive; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by having failed to adopt (all) the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 of 7 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, or by having failed to notify the Commission that it has adopted such provisions, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of that directive; and

| — | order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Under Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2017/593, the Member States were under an obligation to adopt and publish, by 3 July 2017 at the latest, the provisions necessary to comply with that directive and to communicate them forthwith to the Commission. As the Republic of Slovenia did not, within that deadline, communicate to the Commission the measures transposing that directive, the Commission has decided to bring an action before the Court of Justice.

The deadline for transposing the directive expired on 3 July 2017.

---