alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Edward J. Puisis, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation
(the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the
Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 31, 2005 /s/ Edward J. PuisisEdward J. PuisisVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Order entered Febr uary 22 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01248
- CV DANIEL LERINTIU, INC . D/B/A FACTORY DIRE CT HARDWOOD LIQUIDAT ORS

AND DANIEL LERINTIU, IND IVIDUALLY, Appellant s V. STUART MARGOL PROPER TIES, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 06059



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated January 1 3, 2017, we informed appellants the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide t he Court with written verification they had

r equested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellants that failure to provide the required docu mentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellants have not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’sre cord. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellants’

brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael T. Prior, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1.                       the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                    | Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|
|               |                             |   |
| Date: May 10, 2007 | By:                              | /s/ Michael T. Prior |
|               |                             | Michael T. Prior |
|               |                             | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered October 30, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01294 - CV TOM KARTSOTIS, Appellant

V. RICHARD L. BLOCH, IN DIVIDUALLY AND AS A TRUSTEE OF THE RICHA RD AND NANCY BLOCH FAMI LY TRUST, AND NANCY BLOCH AS A TRUSTEE OF THE RICHARD AND NANC Y BLOCH FAMILY TRUST , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 11 - 04489



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s October 28, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of tim e to file his reply brief and cross

- appellee’s brief. Appellant shall file his reply brief and cross

appellee’s brief by NOVEMBER 19, 2015
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott D. Howarth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. as of and for the periods presented in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



By:

/s/    Scott D. HowarthScott D. HowarthPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 15, 2008


I, John M. Cobb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. as of and for
the periods presented in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.



By:

/s/    John M. CobbJohn M. CobbVice President and Chief Financial OfficerDecember 15, 2008
#### State v. Hassard

17118

9/25/95

Affirmed
June 15, 2000

22422

#### State v. Dow

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.12


 


Second AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
SECOND Amendment (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF JUNE 1, 2016
AND AMENDED ON JULY 20, 2017 (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”)
AND frost gamma investments trust (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE
NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on June 1, 2016; and


 


WHEREAS, on July
20, 2017, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 until July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Second Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Second Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 



    	 



    	 



     


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 


6. Counterparts.
This Second Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Second Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Name:	James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Title:	
        Chief Financial Officer

        

	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	FROST GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
        By:

        
	/s/ Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Name:	Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Title:	Trustee
```
**LIST OF ALL SUBSIDIARIES**

                  ACMC, Inc.
                  AFSS, Inc.
                  Applebee's Beverage, Inc.
                  Applebee's of Michigan, Inc.
                  Applebee's of Minnesota, Inc.
                  Applebee's of New Mexico, Inc.
                  Applebee's of New York, Inc.
                  Applebee's of Nevada, Inc.
                  Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar of Georgia, Inc.
                  Applebee's of Pennsylvania, Inc.
                  Applebee's of Texas, Inc.
                  Applebee's of Virginia, Inc.
                  AII Services, Inc.
                  Apple Vermont Restaurants, Inc.
                  Applebee's Northeast, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Arizona, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of California, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Georgia, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Kansas, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Nevada, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Minnesota, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Tennessee, Inc.
                  Gourmet Systems of Wisconsin, Inc.
                  Innovative Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
                  IRC Kansas, Inc.
                  RB International, Inc.
                  Rio Bravo Services, Inc.
                  Rio Bravo Restaurant, Inc.
                  Summit Restaurants, Inc.
                  Apple American Limited Partnership of Minnesota
                  Anne Arundel Apple Holding Corporation
                  GourmetWest of Nevada, Limited Liability Company
                  Applebee's UK, LLC
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Requesting Access to Privacy Act

Records

Last Modified: 

Print

Requests must be in writing in accordance with the instructions set forth in the

system of notice for that system of records. 

The request must include the following information:

The name of the individual making the request;

The name of the system of records;

Preference of inspection, in person or by mail;

Be specific and concise;

Provide sufficient identification or complete in the presence of an agency

official a signed statement asserting the requester’s identity;
Date and sign the request and provide contact information.

Times, places, and requirements for identification

of individuals making requests.

Pursuant to 7 CFR, Part 1, Subpart G §1.113(e), If an individual submitting a request

for access under § 1.112 wishes to be supplied with copies of the records by mail,

the requester shall include with his or her request sufficient data for the agency to

verify the requester's identity. If the sensitivity of the records warrant it, the agency

may require the requester to submit a signed, notarized statement indicating that

the requester is the individual to whom the records pertain and stipulating the

requester understands that knowingly or willfully seeking or obtaining access to

records about another individual under false pretenses is a misdemeanor punishable

by fine up to $5,000. No identification shall be required, however, if the records are

required by 5 U.S.C. 552 to be released. If the agency to which this request is

directed determines to grant the requested access, it may charge fees in

accordance with § 1.120 before making the necessary copies.

[40 FR 39519, Aug. 28, 1975, as amended at 62 FR 33981, June 24, 1997]

Disclosure of records to individuals other than the subject of the records is

prohibited unless written consent is provided by the individual to which

the records pertain.

Submit your request by mail, facsimile, or e-mail.

USDA – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Tonya Woods, FOIA/PA Director

4700 River Road, Unit 50

Riverdale, MD 20737

Facsimile: 301-734-5941

Email: APHISPrivacy@usda.gov

VIA Web Request Form: Click here to submit your Privacy Act Request Online.  If

you should need assistance using the Web Request Form, you may contact the

FOIA/PA Office at 301-851-4102.
How Do I Request an Administrative Appeal of a

Denied Amendment or Correction Request?

Appeals – If you are dissatisfied with the APHIS’ handling of your request for

amendment or correction, you may appeal to the APHIS Administrator. In the event

that the APHIS Administrator denies your request, you may seek judicial review in

the Federal district court.

USDA – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

APHIS Administrator

Privacy Act Appeal

4700 River Road

Riverdale, MD 20737

Email: APHISPrivacy@usda.gov
#### Sofia Kangrga et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Katerina Bajkic et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 15, 1959.

*477
      *George C. Dix*for defendants.

*Paul Neuberger*for plaintiffs.

Saul S. Streit, J.

Defendants, Katerina Bajlric, Milan Jovanovic and Sava Jo vano vie, appearing specially, move to set aside the service of the summons and complaint on the ground that the said summons and complaint was never served personally on said defendants.

It is undisputed that the summons and complaint was served pursuant to section 227-a of the Civil Practice Act. Plaintiffs contend that such service was sufficient because the three defendants, consisting of the widow and the alleged sole legatees of Velimir Bajlric, deceased, designated and authorized the appointment of George C. Dix, as ancillary administrator, *c. t. a.,*of the estate of Velimir Bajlric, deceased; that a proceeding was commenced by him in the Surrogate’s Court of New York County and that the three defendants and the plaintiffs herein were parties to said proceeding; that service upon the attorney was sufficient under section 227-a of the Civil Practice Act. The plaintiffs are under the impression that the designation and authorization of one to act as ancillary administrator makes such designee the agent of said designors and that he acts primarily in the personal interests of his designors.

As stated in *Matter of Patenotre*(123 N. Y. S. 2d 492, 499): *“*This is an entirely erroneous view of the nature of ancillary administration. *‘*The administrations in different states of a single estate are, as a matter of jurisdiction, entirely independent, and it is a mere matter of comity that treats the administrations of the domicile as principal and the others as ancillary.’ Matter of Gaine’s Will, 83 Hun 225, 229, 31 N. Y. S. 664, 665, affirmed 154 N. Y. 747, 49 N. E. 1097. A person appointed as ancillary fiduciary by our court becomes an officer of our State and must act under our laws. Hopper v. Hopper, 125 N. Y. 400, 26 N. E. 457, 12 L. R A. 237; Miller v. Hoag, 182 App. Div. 524, 169 N. Y. S. 755. He will be required to administer the assets in this State under the supervision of this court, and, just as any other fiduciary, he ‘ is under a duty of absolute loyalty to *all*beneficiaries and of fairness and impartiality to *all.’*Matter of James’ Estate, Sur., 86 N. Y. S. 2d 78, 89.”

The court therefore holds that the three defendants herein were not persons commencing the proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court under section 48 of the Surrogate’s Court Act nor as con*478templated in section 227-a of the Civil Practice Act; and that the summons and complaint herein was never delivered to said three defendants personally as required under the law.

Accordingly, the motion is granted.

Settle order.
<PAGE>   1











                                 EXHIBIT 24.0

                     Consent of Coopers and Lybrand, LLP

































<PAGE>   2
                                                                     EXHIBIT 25


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10K
of our report dated January 12, 1996 and January 12, 1995, on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of First American Bancorp and subsidiary as
of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for the years then ended.


                                 /s/ Dudley, Hopton-Jones, Sims & Freeman PLLP
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Dudley, Hopton-Jones, Sims & Freeman PLLP


Birmingham, Alabama
March 21, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1997               
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1996                 
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997                                        
<CASH>                                  8,694,283       
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    481,430     
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             5,192,323      
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 17,484,427        
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   17,800,023       
<LOANS>                               327,791,495         
<ALLOWANCE>                             1,714,512      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        377,380,353         
<DEPOSITS>                            281,342,174         
<SHORT-TERM>                           41,514,194        
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     2,859,235       
<LONG-TERM>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0 
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                4,170,003       
<OTHER-SE>                             47,494,747        
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        377,380,353         
<INTEREST-LOAN>                        26,944,715        
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       1,837,661       
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       28,782,376        
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     12,069,782        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     14,375,507        
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                  14,406,869        
<LOAN-LOSSES>                             200,000     
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                        316,927     
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         9,471,934       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         7,202,954       
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              7,202,954       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0  
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            4,774,062       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.14 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.14  
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               8.30  
<LOANS-NON>                                     0
<LOANS-PAST>                            1,540,000       
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         1,739,000       
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        1,612,627       
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             131,132     
<RECOVERIES>                               33,017    
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       1,714,512       
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 1,714,512       
        

</TABLE>
MICHAEL E. KEELING 

CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE 

MEDICINE & RESEARCH

Alamogordo Primate Facility

248 Chimpanzees

45 HCV Infected

49 HIV positive 57,000 sq ft 6 HBV Carriers
Primate Foundation of Arizona, Now WaNPRC

THE SUN HAS SET ON CHIMPANZEES IN RESEARCH, THEREFORE

WE HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE APPROPIRATE HOUSING AND 

SOCIALIZATION FOR THE REMAINDER OF THEIR LIFETIMES

Functional Appropriate Captive Environments (FAE)

Chapter 3: Environment, Housing, and Management
Recommended Minimum Space for Nonhuman Primates 

Housed in Pairs or Groups (Guide 2010)

Group 8 - Chimpanzees (Pan)

Age Weight Floor Space Height 

(kg) (Square feet) (Inches)

Juveniles <10 15ft 60

Adults >10 ≥25 84

For other apes and large brachiating species cage height should be such that an animal can, when 

fully extended, swing from the cage ceiling without having its feet touch the floor. Cage design should 

enhance brachiating movement. 
1. Housing Design, Construction, and Space

a. Primary Enclosures

• Environmental Design

• Construction Materials

• Housing Size and Density

b. Outdoor Housing 

• Design and Construction

• Vertical Height

• Complexity

c. Naturalistic Environments

Functionally Appropriate Captive Chimpanzee Environments (FAE)
BEHAVIOR AND BIOLOGY OF CHIMPANZEES



Chimpanzee Housing









Indoor Housing Accessories

8’ Corridors and 6” Drains in Human Areas

Using Hot and Cold Water for Cleaning
Lighting and Safety Door
Drain Systems Inside and Outside




PRIMADOME Relocatable External Primate Enclosure (REPE)


APF
Charles River Labs/APF Tool Use with Termite Mound
NEW IBERIA RESEARCH CENTER, LOUISIANA 

PRIMADOME VILLAGE
HAFB ISLANDS WITH MOTE
YERKES NATIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER

CORRALS
Nest Building


Questions?
Animal Area

Low Lux

Auxiliary Area High Lux

Pan-Tilt-Zoom for Monitoring
November 10, 2005

26702

#### Doe Children, In re

Affirmed
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of 1999 Broadway Associates Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.


Date: March 31, 2005                                /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Michael L. Ashner
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 31, 2005                                /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Thomas Staples
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
20726

#### Tung v. Administrative Director of Court

Affirmed