Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85211 

Tail No. Serial No. Aircraft type Departure/arrival cities Dates 

EW–457PA ................ 61423 737–8ZM (B738) ................ Istanbul, TR/Minsk, BY ................................... October 31, 2023. 

EW–457PA ................ 61423 737–8ZM (B738) ................ Hurghada, EG/Minsk, BY ................................ October 30, 2023. 

III. Findings 

Under the applicable standard set 

forth in Section 766.24 of the 

Regulations and my review of the entire 

record, I find that the evidence 

presented by BIS demonstrates that 

Belavia has acted in violation of the 

Regulations and the TDO; that such 

violations have been significant, 

deliberate and covert; and that given the 

foregoing and the nature of the matters 

under investigation, there is a likelihood 

of imminent violations. Moreover, I find 

that renewal for an extended period is 

appropriate because Belavia has 

engaged in a pattern of repeated, 

ongoing and/or continuous apparent 

violations of the EAR. Therefore, 

renewal of the TDO for one year is 

necessary in the public interest to 

prevent imminent violation of the 

Regulations and to give notice to 

companies and individuals in the 

United States and abroad that they 

should avoid dealing with Belavia, in 

connection with export and reexport 

transactions involving items subject to 

the Regulations and in connection with 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

IV. Order 

It is therefore ordered: 

First, Belavia Belarusian Airlines, 

14A, Nemiga str., Minsk, Belarus, 

220004, when acting for or on their 

behalf, any successors or assigns, agents, 

or employees may not, directly or 

indirectly, participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the EAR, 

or in any other activity subject to the 

EAR including, but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license (except directly related to 

safety of flight), license exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the EAR except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations, or engaging in any 

other activity subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the EAR, or from any 

other activity subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of Belavia any 

item subject to the EAR except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

Belavia of the ownership, possession, or 

control of any item subject to the EAR 

that has been or will be exported from 

the United States, including financing 

or other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby Belavia acquires or 

attempts to acquire such ownership, 

possession or control except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from Belavia of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; 

D. Obtain from Belavia in the United 

States any item subject to the EAR with 

knowledge or reason to know that the 

item will be, or is intended to be, 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by Belavia, or 

service any item, of whatever origin, 

that is owned, possessed or controlled 

by Belavia if such service involves the 

use of any item subject to the EAR that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States except directly related to 

safety of flight and authorized by BIS 

pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the 

Regulations. For purposes of this 

paragraph, servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification, or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Belavia by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

sections 766.24(e) of the EAR, Belavia 

may, at any time, appeal this Order by 

filing a full written statement in support 

of the appeal with the Office of the 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast 

Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South 

Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202– 

4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed by Belavia as 

provided in Section 766.24(d), by filing 

a written submission with the Assistant 

Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement, which must be received 

not later than seven days before the 

expiration date of the Order. 

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to Belavia and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for one year. 

Matthew S. Axelrod, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2023–26896 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–867] 

Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From 

India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that certain producers and/or 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85212 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 

FR 81062 (November 17, 2016) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 65750 (November 1, 

2022). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

50 (January 3, 2023). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated January 25, 2023, at 1. 5See JSL’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review for the 

Period of November 01, 2021, to October 31, 2022,’’ 

dated March 23, 2023; see also Memorandum, 

‘‘Selection of Additional Respondent for Individual 

Examination,’’ dated April 4, 2023, at 1. 

Additionally, Commerce has preliminarily 

determined that PSL and Seth Steelage Private 

Limited (SSPL) should be collapsed and treated as 

a single entity, collectively PSL/SSPL. See 

Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the 

Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Stainless 

Pressure Pipe from India; 2021–2022,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), at the 

section titled, ‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing.’’ 

6See Memoranda, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for the 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 12, 2023; and 

‘‘Second Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated October 25, 2023. 

exporters subject to this administrative 

review sold welded stainless pressure 

pipe (WSPP) from India at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR), November 1, 2021, 

through October 31, 2022. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Doss or John Conniff, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4474 and (202) 482–1009, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 17, 2016, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping order on WSPP from 

India.1 On November 1, 2022, 

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

Order.2 On January 3, 2023, based on 

timely requests for review, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce 

initiated an administrative review of the 

Order covering 23 companies.3 On 

January 25, 2023, we selected Jindal 

Saw Limited (JSL) and Ratnamani 

Metals & Tubes Ltd. (Ratnamani) as the 

mandatory respondents in this 

administrative review.4 Subsequently, 

on March 23, 2023, JSL timely withdrew 

its request for review and, consequently, 

on April 4, 2023, Prakash Steelage 

Limited (PSL) was selected as a 

mandatory respondent.5 Pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, 

Commerce extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results until November 30, 

2023.6

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of the 

review, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics included 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included in the 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is welded stainless pressure pipe from 

India. For a complete description of the 

scope, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Act. Export price is calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation. Both SSPL and JSL 

timely withdrew the only requests for 

review for each company. With respect 

to SSPL, because we later selected PSL 

as a mandatory respondent and we have 

preliminarily determined that SSPL is 

part of a single entity with PSL, SSPL 

continues to be subject to the instant 

review. In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), Commerce is rescinding 

this administrative review with respect 

to JSL. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

For the rate for companies not 

selected for individual examination in 

an administrative review, generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a lessthan-fair-value investigation. Under 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the allothers rate is normally ‘‘an amount 

equal to the weighted average of the 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins established for exporters and 

producers individually investigated, 

excluding any zero or de minimis 

margins, and any margins determined 

entirely {on the basis of facts 

available}.’’ In this review, we have 

preliminarily calculated weightedaverage dumping margins of 1.71 

percent for Ratnamani and zero percent 

for PSL/SSPL. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we 

are preliminarily applying Ratnamani’s 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

1.71 percent to the non-examined 

companies because this is the only rate 

that is not zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

November 1, 2021, through October 31, 

2022: 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd ................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Prakash Steelage Ltd/Seth Steelage Pvt. Ltd ............................................................................................................................. 0.00 

Apex Tubes Private Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Apurvi Industries .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85213 

7See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

9See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

10We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

11See Administrative Protective Order, Service, 

and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule, 88 FR 

67069 (September 29, 2023). 12See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

13See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also 

Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

14See Order, 81 FR at 81063; see also 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Continued 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Arihant Tubes .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1.71 

Divine Tubes Pvt. Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. 1.71 

Heavy Metal & Tubes .................................................................................................................................................................. 1.71 

Hindustan Inox. Limited ............................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

J.S.S. Steelitalia Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Linkwell Seamless Tubes Private Limited ................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Maxim Tubes Company Pvt. Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 1.71 

MBM Tubes Pvt. Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Mukat Tanks & Vessel Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Neotiss Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Quality Stainless Pvt. Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................ 1.71 

Raajranta Metal Industries Ltd .................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Ratnadeep Metal & Tubes Ltd .................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Remi Edelstahl Tubulars ............................................................................................................................................................. 1.71 

Shubhlaxmi Metals & Tubes Private Limited .............................................................................................................................. 1.71 

SLS Tubes Pvt. Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1.71 

Steamline Industries Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................. 1.71 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties within five days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register.7

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.8 Interested parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding must submit: (1) a table 

of contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.9

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.10 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).11

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. An electronically 

filed hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless extended, we intend to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days 

of publication of these preliminary 

results in the Federal Register.12

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise. 

For individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), we 

will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem antidumping duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

importer’s examined sales to the total 

entered value of those same sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

If the respondent has not reported 

entered values, we will calculate a perunit assessment rate for each importer 

by dividing the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the examined 

sales made to that importer by the total 

quantity associated with those sales. To 

determine whether an importer-specific, 

per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an 

importer-specific ad valorem ratio based 

on estimated entered values. Where 

either a respondent’s weighted average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis, 

or an importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.13

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by each 

individually examined respondent for 

which the producer did not know that 

the merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate (i.e., 8.35 percent) if there is no rate 

for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.14


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85214 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

15See Order, 81 FR at 81063. 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 79 

FR 67424 (November 13, 2014) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

50 (January 3, 2023). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated June 30, 2023. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China 

and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 79 

FR 67424 (November 13, 2014) (Order). 

For those companies which were not 

individually examined, we will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties at an 

ad valorem rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin determined for 

the non-examined companies in the 

final results of this review. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review, except if the rate 

is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, 

de minimis within the meaning of 19 

CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the 

cash deposit rates will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the producer or exporter 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be the allothers rate of 8.35 percent.15 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties, and/or an increase in the amount 

of antidumping duties by the amount of 

the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results of review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: November 30, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Review 

V. Affiliation and Collapsing 

VI. Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–26878 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–991] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review and Rescission of Review, in 

Part; 2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that countervailable subsidies are 

being provided to producers and 

exporters of chlorinated isocyanurates 

(chlorinated isos) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) during the 

period of review (POR), January 1, 2021, 

through December 31, 2021. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Miranda Bourdeau or Eliza DeLong, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2021 or (202) 482–3878, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 13, 2014, Commerce 

published the countervailing duty order 

on chlorinated isos in the Federal 

Register.1 On January 3, 2023, 

Commerce published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the Order.2 On June 30, 2023, 

Commerce extended the time period for 

issuing these preliminary results until 

November 30, 2023, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).3

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.4 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included at the 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 5

The products covered by the Order 

are chlorinated isos. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1