Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85221 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

50 (January 3, 2023). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated March 23, 2023. 

3See Lianfa’s Letter, ‘‘Lianfa Notice of Intent Not 

to Participate,’’ dated April 14, 2023. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of an Additional 

Mandatory Respondent,’’ dated June 29, 2023. 

5See Yingkou Guangming’s Letter, ‘‘Yingkou 

Notice of Intent Not to Participate,’’ dated July 14, 

2023. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of a Second 

Additional Mandatory Respondent,’’ dated July 25, 

2023. 

7See Jiangsu’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent Not to 

Participate,’’ dated August 8, 2023. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 11, 2023. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2021–2022 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Forged 

Steel Fittings from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 1, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Master Nails and 

Pins Manufacturing, LLC/Middle East 

Manufacturing Steel, LLC (Master) Failed 

to Report Reliable/Verifiable Sales Data 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Make Adjustments to Master’s Data 

Comment 3: Whether Rich Well Steel 

Industries LLC (Rich Well) Failed to 

Provide an Accurate and Reliable Cost 

Database 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust Rich Well’s General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expenses 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–26892 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–067] 

Forged Steel Fittings From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that Qingdao Bestflow 

Industrial Co., Ltd. (Bestflow), the sole 

participating mandatory respondent in 

this review and an exporter of forged 

steel fittings from the People’s Republic 

of China (China), as well as Both-Well 

Taizhou Steel Fittings Co., Ltd. (BothWell), a non-individually-examined 

exporter of forged steel fittings from 

China, sold subject merchandise in the 

United States at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) November 1, 2021, through 

October 31, 2022. Further, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that Xin Yi 

International Trade Co., Limited (Xin 

Yi) had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. Lastly, 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that Lianfa Stainless Steel Pipes & 

Valves (Qingyun) Co., Ltd. (Lianfa), 

Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry 

Co., Ltd. (Yingkou Guangming), Jiangsu 

Forged Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu), 

and 20 other companies for which this 

review was initiated are not eligible for 

a separate rate and, are thus, part of the 

China-wide entity. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This administrative review is being 

conducted in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). On January 3, 2023, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review, 

covering 26 companies.1 On March 23, 

2023, Commerce selected as the 

mandatory respondents, Lianfa Stainless 

Steel Pipes & Valves (Qingyun) Co., Ltd. 

(Lianfa) and Bestflow, the companies 

accounting for the largest volume of 

suspended U.S. entries of subject 

merchandise into the United States as 

reported by U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP).2 On March 23, 2023, 

Commerce also issued its initial nonmarket economy (NME) antidumping 

duty questionnaire to Bestflow and 

Lianfa. On April 14, 2023, Lianfa 

notified Commerce that it intended not 

to participate in this review.3 On June 

29, 2023, Commerce selected Yingkou 

Guangming as an additional mandatory 

respondent based on the volume of 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise, entered for consumption 

into the United States during the POR, 

and issued its initial questionnaire to 

Yingkou Guangming.4 On July 14, 2023, 

Yingkou Guangming notified Commerce 

that it intended not to participate in this 

review.5 On July 25, 2023, Commerce 

selected Jiangsu as a second additional 

mandatory respondent based on the 

volume of suspended entries of subject 

merchandise entered for consumption 

into the United States during the POR, 

and issued its initial questionnaire to 

Jiangsu.6 On August 8, 2023, Jiangsu 

notified Commerce that it intended not 

to participate in this review.7 On July 

11, 2023, Commerce extended the 

preliminary results deadline by 120 

days.8

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.9 A 

list of the topics included in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

included in Appendix I to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is made 

available to the public via Enforcement 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85222 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

10See Forged Steel Fittings from Italy and the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 83 FR 60397 (November 26, 2018) (Order). 

11See Jiangsu, Lianfa, Yingkou Guangming, and 

XinYi’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Requests for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated March 30, 2023. 

12See Both-Well’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of 

Requests for Administrative Review,’’ dated April 2, 

2023. 

13See Bonney Forge’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated November 30, 2022. 

14See Xin Yi’s Letter, ‘‘No Sales Certification,’’ 

dated February 1, 2023. 

15See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Review, Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 

24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR at 51306 

(August 28, 2014). 

16See Appendix II of this notice which identifies 

these 23 companies. 

17See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

18 Id. 

19See Order, 83 FR at 60397. 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 10

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is carbon and alloy forged steel 

fittings, whether unfinished (commonly 

known as blanks or rough forgings) or 

finished. Subject carbon and alloy 

forged steel fittings are normally entered 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

7307.99.1000, 7307.99.3000, 

7307.99.5045, and 7307.99.5060. They 

also may be entered under HTSUS 

subheadings 7307.92.3010, 

7307.92.3030, 7307.92.9000, and 

7326.19.0010. The HTSUS subheadings 

and specifications are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. For a complete description 

of the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. We 

calculated export prices in accordance 

with section 772 of the Act. Because 

China is an NME country within the 

meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, 

NV has been calculated in accordance 

with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Continuation of Administrative Review 

for Various Companies 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. On 

March 30, 2023, Jiangsu, Lianfa, Xin Yi, 

and Yingkou Guangming timely 

withdrew their requests for review.11 On 

April 2, 2023, Both-Well timely 

withdrew its request for review.12

However, as Bonney Forge Corporation 

(Bonney Forge), a domestic producer 

and interested party, also requested 

review of these five companies and 

Bonney Forge’s request has not been 

withdrawn,13 we are not rescinding this 

review with respect to these five 

companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Xin Yi reported that it made no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR.14

Subsequently, Commerce requested that 

CBP provide any information which 

may contradict Xin Yi’s claim; CBP 

reported no such contradictory 

information. Because Xin Yi certified 

that it made no shipments of subject 

merchandise, and there is no 

information on the record which 

contradicts its claim, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that Xin Yi did 

not have shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. Consistent with Commerce’s 

practice, Commerce will not rescind the 

review with respect to this company, 

but instead, will complete the review 

and issue assessment instructions to 

CBP based on the final results.15

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily finds that 23 

companies for which a review was 

initiated did not establish their 

eligibility for a separate rate because 

they failed to provide a separate rate 

application, a separate rate certification, 

or a no-shipment certification if they 

were already eligible for a separate rate, 

or did not cooperate to the best of their 

ability and refused to provide 

Commerce with a complete response to 

its questionnaire.16 As such, we 

preliminarily determine these 23 

companies are part of the China-wide 

entity. 

Additionally, Commerce 

preliminarily finds that the information 

placed on the record by Bestflow and 

Both-Well demonstrates that these 

companies are eligible for a separate 

rate. For additional information, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for 

Non-Examined Companies Granted a 

Separate Rate 

In these preliminary results, the sole 

individually examined mandatory 

respondent (i.e., Bestflow) received a 

weighted-average dumping margin that 

is not zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. Therefore, 

consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, we find it appropriate to assign 

the calculated weighted-average 

dumping margin for Bestflow (i.e., 

496.77 percent) as the weighted-average 

dumping margin for the non-examined, 

separate rate company Both-Well. For 

additional information, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.17 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests and 

Commerce initiates, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the China-wide 

entity.18 Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity and no 

review was initiated for this POR, the 

China-wide entity is not under review 

and the China-wide entity’s rate (i.e., 

142.72 percent) is not subject to 

change.19 For additional information, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the POR: 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85223 

20See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

21See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Final Service Rule). 

22See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

23We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

24See APO and Final Service Rule. 25See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

26See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

27Commerce will apply the assessment rate 

calculation method adopted in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 

28See 19 CFR 351.212 (b)(1). 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Qingdao Bestflow Industrial Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 496.77 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Company 

Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 496.77 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to interested parties subject to an 

administrative protective order within 

five days after the date of publication of 

this notice.20 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(ii), interested parties may 

each submit a case brief no later than 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed 

not later than five days after the date for 

filing case briefs.21 Interested parties 

who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs 

in this proceeding must submit: (1) a 

table of contents listing each issue; and 

(2) a table of authorities.22

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.23 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).24

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. An electronically 

filed hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless the deadline is extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any briefs, 

within 120 days of publication of these 

preliminary results, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by this 

review. Upon issuance of the final 

results, Commerce will determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries covered by this 

review.25 Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review, when the 

company-specific weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), or 

when the importer-specific assessment 

rate calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis.26

Where either a company’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

If Bestflow’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis in the final results of this 

review, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties at the time of 

liquidation, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).27 Because Bestflow did 

not report entered value for its U.S. 

sales, we intend to calculate customerspecific per-unit assessment rates by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

calculated for all reviewed sales to the 

customer by the total quantity of the 

sales to the customer. Commerce will 

also calculate (estimated) ad valorem 

customer-specific assessment rates with 

which to assess whether the per-unit 

assessment rates are de minimis. We 

intend to calculate estimated customerspecific ad valorem assessment rates by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to 

the customer by the total estimated 

entered value of the merchandise sold to 

the customer by Bestflow.28

For the respondent that was not 

selected for individual examination in 

this administrative review but qualified 

for a separate rate (i.e., Both-Well), the 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

determined in the final results of this 

review. 

For the final results, if we continue to 

find that the 23 companies, identified in 

Appendix II, are ineligible for a separate 

rate and are, therefore, considered part 

of the China-wide entity, we will 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85224 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

29See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011), for a full 

discussion of this practice. 

1See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia, 

Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, the Republic of Turkey, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 

Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order). 

2See Mattresses from Thailand: Preliminary 

Results, Preliminary Intent To Rescind, in Part, and 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2022, 88 FR 37009 

(June 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Mattresses from Thailand; 2020–2022,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

instruct CBP to apply an antidumping 

duty assessment rate of 142.72 percent 

(i.e., the rate for the China-wide entity) 

to all entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR which were exported by 

those companies. 

For entries that were not reported in 

the U.S. sales data submitted by 

Bestflow during this review, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the antidumping duty 

assessment rate for the China-wide 

entity.29 Additionally, if Commerce 

determines in the final results that Xin 

Yi had no shipments of the subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under Xin Yi’s case number 

(i.e., at Xin Yi’s cash deposit rate) will 

be liquidated at the antidumping duty 

assessment rate for the China-wide 

entity. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for 

companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate 

will be zero); (2) for previously 

examined Chinese and non-Chinese 

exporters not listed above that received 

a separate rate in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific cash 

deposit rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters 

of subject merchandise that have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 

142.72 percent); and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own separate rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: November 30, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Preliminarily Not Eligible for a 

Separate Rate and Treated as Part of the 

China-Wide Entity 

1. Cixi Baicheng Hardware Tools, Ltd. 

2. Dalian Guangming Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. 

3. Eaton Hydraulics (Luzhou) Co., Ltd. 

4. Eaton Hydraulics (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. 

5. Jiangsu Forged Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. 

6. Jiangsu Haida Pipe Fittings Group Co. 

7. Jinan Mech Piping Technology Co., Ltd. 

8. Jining Dingguan Precision Parts 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

9. Lianfa Stainless Steel Pipes & Valves 

(Qingyun) Co., Ltd. 

10. Luzhou City Chengrun Mechanics Co., 

Ltd. 

11. Ningbo HongTe Industrial Co., Ltd. 

12. Ningbo Long Teng Metal Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd. 

13. Ningbo Save Technology Co., Ltd. 

14. Ningbo Zhongan Forging Co., Ltd. 

15. Q.C. Witness International Co., Ltd. 

16. Shanghai Lon Au Stainless Steel 

Materials Co., Ltd. 

17. Witness International Co., Ltd. 

18. Yancheng Boyue Tube Co., Ltd. 

19. Yancheng Haohui Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. 

20. Yancheng Jiuwei Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. 

21. Yancheng Manda Pipe Industry Co., Ltd. 

22. Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

23. Yuyao Wanlei Pipe Fitting Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–26879 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–841] 

Mattresses From Thailand: Final 

Results and Rescission of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Saffron Living Co., Ltd. (Saffron) did not 

have a bona fide sale during the period 

of review (POR) November 3, 2020, 

through April 30, 2022. Therefore, we 

are rescinding this administrative 

review. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paola Aleman Ordaz, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4031. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 6, 2023, Commerce published 

its preliminary results in the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on mattresses 

from Thailand 1 in the Federal Register 

and invited interested parties to 

comment.2 For a summary of the events 

that occurred since the publication of 

the Preliminary Results, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce 

conducted this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

are mattresses from Thailand. The 

products subject to this Order are 

currently properly classifiable under 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1