alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 21, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 112 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-69, CP2024-70.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26830 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
U.S. Department ofTransportation Office of the Secretary ofTransportation

Mr. Randy Vivian President/CEO Victoria Chamber ofCommerce 3404 N Ben Wilson Street Victoria, TX 77901 Dear Mr. Vivian: Assistant Secretary 

## AUG 26 2014 1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE Washington, DC 20590

Thankyoufor yom letter, addressed to Secretary Foxx, supporting the proposal submitted by the Victoria Regional Airport for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small
. Community Air Service Development Program. Secretary Foxx asked that I respond to you on his behalf. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares and insufficient service. Under the statute, theDepartmentmay make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, although no more than four may be to communities in the same State. To provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofair service development projects that canbe funded. OnJune 30, the Department issued an order setting a deadline ofJuly 31 for applications. As these grantrequests are pending beforethe Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particularproposaL I assure you, however, that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. As is our standard practice, I amplacing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0113 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this program. Sincerely yours,

# ~0 Susan L. Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International AffairsVIOf081R aUAMBER Gf CD&IM£RCE
July 29, 2014
Mr. Anthony R. Foxx, Secretary Department ofTransportatfon 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590-0001 RE: Small Community Air Service Development Grant Victoria Regional Airport Dear Sec. Foxx Iam writing you on behalfofthe Victoria Regional Airport and theirgrant application. The Victoria Regional Airport and air service there is extremely importantto our continued growth as a regional. With our petrochemical industry,our need for quality reliable air service is essential to maintain business in our region. We support the airport in their applicationfor this grant and will provide whatever services we can to supportthe grant and secure the funding. The Victoria Chamber ofCommerce will provide in-kind services to the amount of$5,000 ofadvertising on ourwebsite and through ouremail and distribution lists. Our email list reaches outto 850 businesses and individuals, representing approximately 25,000 employed individuals in the crossroads area. Again, I cannot stress enough what this funding will aid the airport in securing ridership and protect and enhance our local industry and the all economic development in our region. Thank you foryour attentionto this matter. Please contact me if I can be ofany service to you.

Victoria Chamberof**Comm~Jn:e** 3404 N. Uen Wilson Victoriil, Texa5 77901 (361) 573·5277 Orficc- (361) 573-S'JII Fax www.victoriachantbcr.org
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 24.01 - POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Joel J. Kocher and Allen L. Shulman, and
each of them, his lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Interland, Inc. for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004 and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granted unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                   SIGNATURE                                 TITLE                                  DATE
                   ---------                                 -----                                  ----
            <S>                                            <C>                                <C>



             /s/ John B. Balousek                          Director                           November 15, 2004
            -----------------------
             John B. Balousek



             /s/ Dr. John Patrick Crecine                  Director                           November 15, 2004
            -----------------------
         Dr. John Patrick Crecine



             /s/ Robert Lee                                Director                           November 15, 2004
            -----------------------
                Robert Lee



             /s/ Edward L. Shapiro                         Director                           November 15, 2004
            -----------------------
             Edward L. Shapiro



             /s/ Robert T. Slezak                          Director                           November 15, 2004
            -----------------------
             Robert T. Slezak
</TABLE>
December 9 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AARON FRANK DOMANGUE X , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00122

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Notice of Availability—Finding of No

Significant Impact for Supplement to

the Environmental Assessment:

White-Tailed Deer Damage

Management in New York

Print

Wildlife Services (WS), a program within the United States Department of

Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), has issued

a Decision and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Supplement to the

2015 Environmental Assessment (EA) titled “White-Tailed Deer Damage

Management in New York,” which evaluated potential impacts to the quality of the

human environment from the implementation of a deer damage management

program. WS issued a Decision/FONSI on March 15, 2024, selecting to implement the

proposed action alternative, which is an integrated approach using a variety of

methods to reduce deer damage to agriculture, property, natural resources, and

human health and safety.  WS concluded that implementation of the proposed

action alternative would not have a significant impact upon the quality of the human

environment based on the analyses contained in the EA, Supplement, and the

associated Decision/FONSI.  
Interested parties can view the EA, Supplement, and the Decision/FONSI at

regulations.gov: 

View Docket APHIS-2015-0093

Interested parties may also request a hard copy of the EA, Supplement, the

Decision/FONSI, or all by submitting a request to:

New York Wildlife Services State Director

572 Third Avenue Extension, Suite 2

Rensselaer, NY 12144  

Include a mailing address when submitting a request by mail.
January 5, 1998

20447

#### State v. Brooks

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the report) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Louis R. Tomasetta, the Chief Executive Officer and Eugene F. Hovanec, the Chief Financial
Officer of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 8, 2005



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ LOUIS R. TOMASETTA                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EUGENE F. HOVANEC                                                                                             
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



1
EXHIBIT 32.1

GENAERA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Armstrong, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John L. Armstrong, Jr.           
|John L. Armstrong, Jr.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2007
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court of the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3629

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Eddie Rask, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 30, 2007 Filed: August 3, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eddie Rask challenges the 100-month prison sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded gu ilty to a drug offense

. For reversal, he argues that his sentence was unreasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 because his criminal history was overstated and the court refu sed to grant his motion fo r a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 (allowing departure for over- or under-represented criminal history). We affirm, because the district court’s clear ly discretionary decision not to depart is unreviewable, seeUnited States v. Lee , 451 F.3d 914, 918 (8th Cir. 2006) (even after-2- United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), discretionary decision not to depart under Guidelines continues to be unreviewable on appeal), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Oct. 30, 2006) (No. 06- 7591), and we see no basis to conclude that the sentence- -imposed at the bottom of the advisory Guidelines range--is unreasonable, seeRita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2463-68 (U.S. 2007) (discussing application of presumption of reasonableness to senten ce that reflected proper application of Guidelines); United States v. Harris , No. 06-2892, 2007 WL 1964651, at *3 (8th Cir. July 9, 2007) (sentence within advisory Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PAULA BIRD, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 19-1581 (JMC)

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended 

Complaint, ECF 51; Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion, ECF 52; Defendant’s Reply, ECF 54;

and all relevant filings; and for the reasons stated in the forthcoming Memorandum Opinion, to be 

issued soon, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF 51, is 

DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

DATE: April 15, 2022

 Jia M. Cobb

 U.S. District Court Judge
9 . 14. 2016

Contact CVB Program and Information Management and Security 

(PIMS) at: CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov

What to Expect From the Next Phase of the Portal

On September 15th you’re going to notice some changes in the NCAH Portal. You’ll be able to do more because we’ve 

expanded the functionality to include APHIS Form 2048, CVB Inspection and Compliance E-Submission Form, and 

APHIS Form 2049, Veterinary Biologics Regulatory E-Submission Form Policy, Evaluation, and Licensing. 

Basically this means that in addition to the submissions you are already putting through the NCAH Portal, you may also 

Helpful Tips for using the 

Portal

You Asked, We Answered

What we’re working on for future issues...

Vol. 1 ISSUE 2

NCAH PORTAL news for CVB

In this latest version of the NCAH Portal, enhancements were made to capabilities and features and some minor bugs 

were fixed. We got some great feedback from users that helped us determine where changes were needed to make your 

user experience better.

Some of the changes included in this version are:

 You will be able to submit correspondence to IC (via APHIS Form 2048) and PEL (via APHIS Form 2049) using 

the NCAH Portal

 Updates to the Account Details page that make it easier to quickly find what you need

 You will now receive an email when the status changes to "Complete" for submissions of APHIS 2048, 2049 or 

2007

 You will be able to update 2048 or 2049 submissions that have already been sent to CVB so that you can add 

additional attachments and/or comments to the submission

 You will be able to search on completed or open items and have the option to export to Excel, so that you can view 

information on items you have submitted

 Items will be kept in the Awaiting Update from Submitter status on the Recent Activity tab (even if the last activity 

on them was more than 2 weeks ago) so you don’t forget about them

 The formatting of the Packing Slip for samples was changed to make it easier to read

Visit the NCAH Portal Guidance webpage to see additional User Guides and videos that have been posted, as well as 

some updated versions.

submit most remaining types of correspondence (with some exceptions). If you haven’t yet, you should read CVB Notice 

16-14 to get all the information about this expansion.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 292 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 292

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 10, 2015.
    Resolved, That on such date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives 
may designate, official photographs of the House may be taken while the House is 
in actual session. Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, and 
distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of the 
House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Wildlife Services Methods Risk

Assessments

Last Modified: 

Print

Wildlife Services uses a wide variety of methods to help resolve conflicts between

humans and wildlife and to conduct other activities such as wildlife surveys and

disease monitoring.  

WS conducts wildlife damage management (WDM) activities to:

protect human health and safety, such as on airports and in urban areas

manage invasive species, such as feral swine, European starlings, and brown

treesnakes

protect agricultural and natural resources, such as livestock, crops, and

threatened and endangered species

protect property, and

monitor wildlife diseases that impact people, domestic pets, livestock, and

wildlife.

In support of WDM activities, APHIS prepared risk assessments on many of the

methods it uses. The risk assessments analyze the impacts of these WDM methods

on people and the environment. To ensure the scientific rigor of the risk

assessments, non-federal professionals, with knowledge of the methods and risks

associated with their use, have conducted, or will be conducting, peer reviews of the
assessments. The peer reviewers were selected by the Association of Fish and

Wildlife Agencies, the organization of state, provincial and territorial fish and wildlife

agencies in North America, entrusted with primary stewardship over vital wildlife

resources.

Wildlife Services Methods Risk Assessments

The Methods Risk Assessments identify the risks associated with methods Wildlife

Services frequently uses to manage damage caused by wildlife.

Peer Reviewed Chapters

1 – Introduction

2 - Cage Traps

3 - Cable Devices

4 - Foothold Traps

5 - Aircraft

6 – Firearms

7 - Sodium Cyanide

8 – Carbon Monoxide

9 – Aluminum Phosphide

10 – Zinc Phosphide

11 – GonaCon

12 – Lead

13 – Nets

14 – Quick-kill Traps

15 – Dog Use

16 – Egg Addling

17 – DRC-1339

18 - Hand Capture

19 - Strychnine

20 - Sodium Fluoroacetate

21 - Explosives

22 - Exclusion

23 - Carcass Disposal

25 - 4-Aminopyridine (Avitrol)
26 - Chlorophacinone

27 - Immobilization and Euthanasia

See More See Less

Chapters Undergoing Peer Review Process (Not Finalized)

24 - Registered Chemical Repellents

28 - Nonchemical Deterrents

29 - Minimum Risk Pesticides

30 - Diphacinone

31 - Brodifacoum

Contact Us

If you have questions, please contact the WS Operational Support Staff at 301-851-

4009.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 13, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00450-CV

TEXAS CONSTRUCTION SPECIALISTS, LLC AND MARK YOUNG, 

Appellants

V.

NAEGELI TRANSPORTATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1126375

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 13, 2020. The notice of 

appeal was filed June 12, 2020. To date, our records show that appellant has not 

paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in 

civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying 

costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs).
2

On July 16, 2020, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee 

on or before July 31, 2020 or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not 

paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
Motion Granted; Order filed December 31 , 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00447

- CV

____________ MARCUS A. TOWNLEY AN D ERIN M. MCCAIN , Appellant s
V.

LINDA A

. LANIER , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1077886



### ORDER
This appeal is from an order signed March 6, 2019 . Appellant s filed a notice of appeal May 31, 2019 . Appellant
, Mar cus A. Townley, filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court. “ A party who files a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule .” See Tex. R. Civ . P. 145(a)

. Appellant Townl ey has not been ordered to p ay costs pu rsuant to Rule 145.

Alexandra McDani el, t he court reporter for the County Civil C o urt at Law
No . 4 the is directed to file the reporter’s record within 30 days of the date of this
order.PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
January 20, 1998

20540

#### Bonner v. Administrative Director of the Court, State

Affirmed