alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED
MARCH 29, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1999
<CASH>                                           3,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                       269
<INVENTORY>                                      9,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,280
<PP&E>                                          45,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 616,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,406
<BONDS>                                        446,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   616,838
<SALES>                                        293,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,459
<CGS>                                          228,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,943)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,161)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robel Kidane PHILLIPOS, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 15-1716

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Entered: August 3, 2017

Before Barron, Selya, and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF COURT

Petitioner Robel Kidane Phillipos has filed a timely petition for rehearing en banc. Petitioner and amici curiae the MGH Center for Law, Brain, and Behavior, the *16Innocence Project, and the American Psychological Association contend, among other things, that the panel erred in concluding that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in excluding testimony on false confessions from Dr. Richard Leo. See United States v. Phillipos, 849 F.3d 464, 471-72 (1st Cir. 2017).-Petitioner and amicus curiae the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers separately contend that the panel erred in ruling that it was not an abuse of discretion for the District Court to deny the defendant an evidentiary hearing on the volun-tariness of his confession. See id. at 468-69.

Pursuant to First Circuit Internal Operating Procedure X(C), we construe a petition for 'rehearing en banc also as a petition for rehearing before the original panel. The petition for panel rehearing is denied. We clarify that our conclusion that “the record certainly shows that the [decision] the District Court reached is reasonable,” Phillipos, 849 F.3d at 471-72, refers to those portions of the District Court's ruling that concern what the record shows regarding the proposed testimony of Dr. Leo in particular, and not to those portions of the District Court’s ruling that appear to express skepticism more generally about research regarding false confessions. We also emphasize that the defendant, in seeking an evidentiary hearing on the basis of his own affidavit, declined to commit to being cross-examined about that affidavit, even in the event that the District Court determined at the evidentiary hearing that such cross-examination would be necessary to determine the credibility of the allegations in the affidavit.
NCAH	PORTAL	CVB	QUICK	REFERENCE	GUIDE

Outline of Production Templates

B

CVB Supplied Templates (for Electronically Submitted Outlines only)

Template for Vaccine, Bacterin, Antigen and Toxoid Products

Template for Allergenic Extract Products

Template for Antiserum, Antitoxin and Normal Serum Products

Template for Diagnostic Test Kit Products

Template for Special Outlines

Template for Autologous Products

Paper Outlines

The CVB will accept paper Outlines using the recommended templates specified above. All 

Outlines of Production must conform to Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 

114.8-114.9 and Veterinary Services Memorandum (VSM) 800.206.

Publication Date: 06/18/2020 Page 1 of 1
August 9, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KEVIN PREDERGAST AND JAMES INBODEN, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00206-CV V.

DANIEL J. HOFFMAN AND DANIEL J. HOFFMAN, LLC D/B/A DANIEL J. 

HOFFMAN & ASSOCIATES, FKA DANIEL J. HOFFMAN, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on November 9, 2011. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We order appellant, Kevin Predergast and James Inboden, jointly and severally, to 

pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R. Tauscher, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)               the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/   Mark R. Tauscher                  |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Mark   R. Tauscher                      |
|                      |   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   | (Principal   Executive Officer)         |

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G. Thomasch, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)               the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/   Karen J. Raus             |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                      |   | Karen   J. Raus                 |
|                      |   | Controller                      |
|                      |   | (Principal   Financial Officer) |

 

----
January 21, 1998

19289

#### State v. Amigable

Affirmed
February 24, 2005

25601

#### State v. Aeto

Vacated and Remanded
928 P.2d 39

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Radcliffe

18555

11/04/96

Vacated in part and Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Humanities Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal for Humanities Panel Advisory 
Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act and its 
implementing regulations, the National Endowment for the Humanities 
(NEH) gives notice that the Charter for the Humanities Panel advisory 
committee was renewed for an additional two-year period on November 17, 
2023. The Chair of NEH determined that the renewal of the Humanities 
Panel is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the 
performance of duties imposed upon the Chair of NEH by the National 
Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Voyatzis, Committee 
Management Officer, 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20506. 
Telephone: (202) 606-8322, facsimile (202) 606-8600, or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6d1d3d8d5d9c3d8c5d3daf6d8d3de98d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670002090408120914020b2709020f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National 
Endowment for the Humanities' TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

    Dated: November 28, 2023.
Jessica Graves,
Paralegal Specialist, National Endowment for the Humanities.
[FR Doc. 2023-26447 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Aki v. County of Kaua'i

17014

10/07/96

Affirmed
SCWC-12-0000690

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

COBY JONES,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000690; CR. NO. 08-1-0170)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on 

July 1, 2014, by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Coby Jones, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 12, 2014.

James S. Tabe

for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000690

12-AUG-2014

01:35 PM
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                   CENTENNIAL CELLULAR CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-Q

               For the Six Months Ended November 30, 1997 and 1996

                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                  (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Six Months Ended
                                                       ----------------------------------
                                                       November 30,          November 30,
                                                          1997                   1996
                                                        --------               --------
                                                                  (Unaudited)

<S>                                                  <C>                   <C>           
Primary fully diluted:
Net Loss                                             $    (16,412)         $     (12,228)
Preferred stock dividends                                  (8,226)                (7,723)
                                                     ------------          -------------
Loss applicable to common shares                     $    (24,638)         $     (19,951)
                                                     ============          =============
Average number of common shares and common
      share equivalents outstanding
        Average number of common shares
        outstanding during this period                 26,601,000             26,932,000
        Add common share equivalents - Options
        to purchase common shares - net                   302,000                120,000
                                                     ------------          -------------
Average number of common shares and common
      share equivalents outstanding                    26,903,000 (A)         27,052,000 (A)
                                                     ============          =============
Loss per common share                                $       (.92)(A)      $        (.74)(A)
                                                     ============          =============

(A) In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15, the
    inclusion of common share equivalents in the computation of earnings per
    share need not be considered if the reduction of earnings per share is
    less than 3% or the effect is anti-dilutive. Therefore, loss per common
    share and common share equivalents as shown on the Consolidated Statements
    of Operations for the periods presented do not include certain common share
    equivalents as their effect is anti-dilutive.


                                       27



<PAGE>
 


</TABLE>
Opinion issued May 21, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00079
- CV

——————————— GLORIA FELDER , Appellant

V. WOODLEN GLEN APARTME NTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1056604

MEMORANDUM OPINION
T he parties , representing that they have reached a mutual settlement agreement, have filed a n agreed motion to dismiss requesting that we vacate the2

trial court’s judgment and dismiss the lawsuit

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). No opinion has issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(c). Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment , and dismiss the case

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), 43.2(c) ; s ee Jester Venture Ltd. v. Nash , No. 01

– 06

– 00512

– CV, 2006 WL 2042358 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] July 17, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.) (vacating trial court ’s judgment and dismissing case on parties ’ agreed motion) . We dismiss any other pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.
22685

#### Property Reserve, Inc. ex rel. Zions Securities Corp. v. Valdez

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commodity-Based Resource and

Assistance

Last Modified: 

Print
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

FOIA Reading Room

Last Modified: 

Print

Welcome to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Reading Room.

The FOIA Reading Room contains frequently requested documents and other records

routinely available to the public under FOIA. These include policy statements, staff

manuals and instructions, final opinions made in the adjudication of cases, and a log

of records requested under FOIA.

APHIS maintains an electronic reading room only. If you need assistance using the

FOIA Reading Room, contact the FOIA Office at 301-851-4102 or

foia.officer@usda.gov.

Frequently Requested Records 

Documents in this category include records that have been released, in full or with

redactions, in response to three or more FOIA requests. These also include other

FOIA-processed documents that are likely to be of interest to the public.

View Frequently Requested Records

FOIA Guidance and Resources
USDA Electronic FOIA Reading Room (includes USDA Annual FOIA Reports and

Chief FOIA Officer Reports)

USDA FOIA Regulations

USDA FOIA Reference Guidance

DOJ Guide to FOIA

Open Government Act

FOIA Improvement Act of 2016

Your Right to Federal Records

APHIS FOIA Logs

FOIA Exemptions and Exclusions

APHIS Policies and News

User Fees

News and Announcements

Regulatory Agenda (you must enter "Department of Agriculture" in the search

bar to find APHIS items)

Congressional Testimony

Animal Health (2019)

Select Agents (2017)

Select Agents (September 2016)

Domestic Safeguarding (April 2016)

Domestic Safeguarding (March 2016)

Enforcement Records

Enforcement Summaries

USDA Office of Hearings and Appeals

Key Program Area Information
Animal Health

Livestock and Poultry Disease

Animal Health Surveillance

Live Animal Exports

Importing Live Animals and Germplasm

International Regulations (IRegs) for Animal Product Exports

Animal Product Imports

Accredited Veterinarians by State

Animal Disease Traceability

Center for Veterinary Biologics

Animal Welfare

USDA Animal Care Public Search Tool

Animal Welfare and Horse Protection Actions

Horse Protection Act Information

Research Facility Annual Reports

Regulated Businesses (Licensing and Registration)

Animal Care Publications, Guidance Documents, and Forms

Biotechnology

Regulatory Status Review

Guidance Documents

Permits

Plant Health

Agricultural Commodity Import Requirements (ACIR) Database

Plant Pests and Diseases

Plant Health Contacts

Plant and Plant Product Imports
Plant and Plant Product Exports

Wood Packaging Material

Plant Health Commodity Trade Manuals

Plant Health Domestic Programs and Emergency Response Manuals

Wildlife Damage

National Rabies Management Program

Program Data Reports and Other Publications

Airport Wildlife Hazards Program

Wildlife Services Directives

National Environmental Policy Act Documents: Wildlife Services

National Wildlife Disease Program

National Feral Swine Damage Management Program

Other Useful Resources

Privacy Act

Federal Register

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations

United States Code
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Agency for Global Media

# AGENCY:

United States Agency for Global Media.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) announces the members of its SES Performance Review Board (PRB).

# ADDRESSES:

USAGM Office of Human Resources, 330 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20237.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ellona Fritschie, Senior Advisor, at                         *efritschie@usagm.gov*                         or (202) 920-2400.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314, USAGM publishes this notice announcing the individuals who will serve as members of the PRB for a term of one year. The PRB is responsible for: (1) reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of                           ( print page 83944)                        Senior Executive Service and Senior Level members; and (2) making recommendations on other performance management issues, such as pay adjustments, bonuses, and Presidential Rank Awards. The names, position titles, and appointment types of each member of the PRB are set forth below:                

1. Sylvia Rosabal, Director, Office of Cuba Broadcasting, Non-Career SES

2. Grant Turner, Chief Financial Officer, Career SES

3. David Kotz, Chief Management Officer, Career SES

Dated: November 27, 2023.

Armanda Matthews,

Program Support Specialist, U.S. Agency for Global Media.

[FR Doc. 2023-26476 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Tyrone Jackson, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered October 28, 2015, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of public consumption of alcohol, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered October 28, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument charging defendant with public consumption of alcohol (<i>see</i> Administrative Code of City of NY ยง 10-125[b]) was not jurisdictionally defective. Defendant's intent to consume alcohol in public can be readily inferred from the sworn police allegations that defendant was observed in front of a specified street address with an "open container that contained an alcoholic beverage," namely, a "24 [ounce] can of Steele Reserve beer" (<i>see</i> Administrative Code ยง 10-125[c]; <a href="../2016/2016_51671.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Rivera</i>, 53 Misc 3d 150</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51671[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2016], <i>lv denied</i> 28 NY3d 1188 [2017]; <a href="../2014/2014_08263.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also People v Basono</i>, 122 AD3d 553</a> [2014], <i>lv denied </i>25 NY3d 1069 [2015]). Likewise, the accusatory instrument, read as a whole, supported the inference that defendant was in a "public place" as that term is defined in the Code provision at issue (<i>see</i> Administrative Code of City of NY ยง 10-125[a][2]).</p><p>Defendant's challenge to the electronic recording of the proceeding below is unpreserved and no prejudice is apparent from the record (<a href="../2017/2017_27076.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Wanass</i>, 55 Misc 3d 97</a> [2017], <i>lv denied</i> 29 NY3d 1088 [2017]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: December 20, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>