alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10(r)

                 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                  HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION AND GARY T. KNISELY

     This document, dated as of April 1, 2000, shall constitute Amendment No. 1
to an Employment Agreement dated as of January 23, 1997 (the "Employment
Agreement") between Hanover Foods Corporation (the "Employer") and Gary T.
Knisely (the "Employee").

                                   Background

     As of January 12, 1997, Employer and Employee entered into the Employment
Agreement. The parties desire to further amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as
follows:

     3.   Change to Section 27.2. Section 27.2 is hereby amended to read in full
          as follows:

     "27.2 Settlement of Disputes. Any claims, controversies, demands, disputes
or differences between or among the parties hereto or any persons bound hereby
arising out of, or by virtue of, or in connection with, or relating to this
Agreement shall be submitted to and settled by arbitration in the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania and County of Philadelphia. Such arbitration shall be conducted
in accordance with the then prevailing rules of the American Arbitration
Association by one independent and impartial arbitrator appointed by the
American Arbitration Association, who shall be a former judge. All
pre-arbitration discovery shall be completed within 90 days of the request for
arbitration The arbitrator shall render his award within 90 days of the
conclusion of the arbitration hearing. The provisions of Section 25 hereof shall
govern the arbitration. Any award rendered by the arbitrator shall be final and
binding, and not subject to appeal or other judicial review, and judgment hereon
may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. Nothing contained herein
shall restrict the Employer from seeking equitable remedies in a court of
competent jurisdiction for any alleged violations of the provisions of Section
16 or 21 hereof."

     4.   Amended Employment Agreement Continues in Full Force and Effect

     There are no amendments to the Employment Agreement, except as specified
herein. The amended Employment Agreement, as amended further, shall continue in
full force and effect and constitutes the entire understanding of the parties
with respect to its subject matter.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 on this
day and year first above written.


ATTEST/WITNESS:                               HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION

/s/ Patricia H. Townsend                      /s/ John. A. Warehime    (SEAL)
--------------------------------              ---------------------------


WITNESS/ATTEST:                               EMPLOYEE:

/s/ Patricia J. Weaver                        /s/ Gary T. Knisely      (SEAL)
--------------------------------              ---------------------------


                                      -24-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Financial Federal Corporation for the year ended July 31,
2004, the undersigned officer, being the Chief Executive Officer of
Financial Federal Corporation, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31,
     2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
     for the year ended July 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of Financial Federal Corporation.

     A signed original of this written statement required by section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is
not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document.



October 4, 2004                  /s/ Paul R. Sinsheimer
---------------                  ---------------------------
Date                             Paul R. Sinsheimer
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130960 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130960 COA: 268120 Wayne CC: 04-018632-01 RICKY DARNELL SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
Order filed February 28, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00017-CR

____________

ROBERT TAYLOR WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1225261

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 17, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P.

35.2. On February 6, 2012, the clerk of this court received the reporter’s record, but was 

unable to file it because volumes eight through eleven had not been signed by Walter N. 

Johnson, the court reporter. We therefore issue the following order.

We order Walter N. Johnson, the official court reporter, to file a complete, signed 

record in this appeal on or before March 9, 2012.

PER CURIAM
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  August 9, 2004               /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                    A signed original of this written  statement
                                    required by Section 906 has been provided to
                                    CNL  Income  Fund  XII,  Ltd.  and  will  be
                                    retained  by CNL Income Fund XII,  Ltd.  and
                                    furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
                                    Commission or its staff upon request.
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

July 12, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Add Aircraft to Exemption # 11815 Issued to Enviroskycam.

(Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1101)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enviroskycam was granted an exemption to conduct aerial data collection using a DJI Phantom 2 

Vision +. Enviroskycam (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1101) requests for an amendment to that

exemption to add onto its fleet the DJI Phantom 3 and Action Drone AD-2. Enviroskycam agrees to 

operate under the same restrictions in the exemption. The aircraft flight manuals will be confidentially 

submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov

Granting the additional aircraft will benefit the public because instead of dangerous helicopters 

being used, safer and quieter unmanned aircraft can be used under the restrictions outlined in the 

exemption.

Since the Phantom 3 and aircraft similar to the Action Drone AD-2 platform has been previously 

granted in other exemptions and would not set any precedent, there is good cause to waive the 

publishing of this petition in the Federal Register.

Sincerely,

__________________________________________________

Jonathan B. Rupprecht, Esq.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6421

PRINCE S. J. WEBBER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES PAROLE

COMMISSION,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Senior District Judge.

(CA-02-3093-FNS)

Submitted: July 1, 2003 Decided: July 24, 2003

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Prince S. J. Webber, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Neil Ray

White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Prince S. J. Webber appeals from the district court’s denial

of his petition for a writ a mandamus, which sought an effective

parole date or an order to full term expiration from the United

States Parole Commission. Mandamus relief is only available when

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First

Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in

extraordinary situations. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426

U.S. 394, 402 (1976). 

Because Webber fails to establish a clear right to the relief

he seeks, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Thus, we affirm

the district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district

court. Webber v. Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-02-3093-FNS (D. Md. Feb.

20, 2003). We also deny Webber’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### State v. Kim

18610

4/8/97

Affirmed
#### State v. Loher

26000

02/11/2005

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 117 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-77, CP2024-79.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26815 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### State v. Delatorre

22898

10/23/2000

Vacated and Remanded
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John A. Ciccarelli, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief
Executive Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge: The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the
Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 31, 2005 /s/John A. CiccarelliJohn A. CiccarelliChairman of the Board of Directors, President,
Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 3.2
 BYLAWS
OF
XATA CORPORATION
 ARTICLE I
OFFICES
  ARTICLE 11
SHAREHOLDERS MEETINGS
 Section 2.1. Time and Place of Meetings
 Section 2.2. Regular Meetings
 Section 2.3. Special Meetings




---



##### 



Section 2.4. Notice of Meetings
  Section 2.5. Closing of Transfer Books; Record Date
 Section 2.6. Waiver of Notice
 Section 2.7. Action without Meeting
 Section 2.8. Quorum
 2




---



##### 



Section 2.9. Voting
 Section 2.10. Proxies
   Section 2.11. Advance Notice of Business
 3




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 Section 3.1. Election of Directors
 4




---



##### 



Section 3.2. Board Meetings; Place and Notice
 Section 3.3. Waiver of Notice
 Section 3.4. Quorum and Action of Board
   Section 3.5. Electronic Communications
 5




---



##### 



Section 3.6. Vacancies
 Section 3.7. Resignations
 Section 3.8. Removal
 Section 3.9. Absent Directors
 Section 3.10. Action without Meeting
 Section 3.11. Presumption of Assent
 6




---



##### 



Section 3.12. Committees
 Section 3.13. Chairman
 Section 3.14. Compensation
 Section 3.15. Limitation of Liability
 ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
 Section 4.1. Election of Officers
 7




---



##### 



Section 4.2. Terms of Office
 Section 4.3. Salaries
 Section 4.4. President/Chief Executive Officer
 Section 4.5. Vice Presidents
 Section 4.6. Secretary and Assistant Secretaries
  Section 4.7. Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and Assistant
 8




---



##### 



Section 4.9. Delegation of Authority
 Section 4.10. Contract Rights
 ARTICLE V
INDEMNIFICATION
  9




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
SHARES
 Section 6.1. Issuance of Shares
 Section 6.2. Certificates.
 Section 6.3. Transfer of Shares
 10




---



##### 



Section 6.4. Lost Certificates
     Section 6.5. Dividends
  ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS
 Section 7.1. Books of Account
 11




---



##### 



Section 7.2. Corporate Seal
 Section 7.3. Checks and Documents
 Section 7.4. Fiscal Year
 Section 7.5. Amendments to Bylaws
 12
FEE TABLE – UNITED STATES WAREHOUSE ACT (Effective 10/1/2019) 

SWEETENERS

License 

Action 

Fee 

Service 

License 

Fee 

Inspection Fee Annual User Fees 

Annual Fee Licensed Capacities 

$ 90 $40 $7.15 for each 

5,000 gallons of

liquid 

$7.15 

for each 

$750 MIN 

5,000 gallons of liquid, 

or fraction thereof 

 MIN $ 190 

MAX $1900 or or 

 or 

$7.15 55,000 pounds of 

 $7.15 for each 

55,000 

for each 

$750 MIN 

dry capacity, 

or fraction thereof 

pounds of dry 

 capacity 

 MIN $ 190 

 MAX $1900
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*


In connection with the Annual Report of IEA Income Fund X (the Registrant) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J. Tietz, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the General
Partner of the Registrant, certify, based on my knowledge, that:

| |  |      |  |                                                                                                                                                       
| |  | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                 
| |  |      |  |                                                                                                                                                       
| |  | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.

|               |  |    |  |                                                                                                               
|-------------- |  | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 25, 2003 |  |    |  |                                                                                                               
|               |  |    |  |                                                                                                               
|               |  | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                                                                                           
|               |  |    |  |                                                                                                               
|               |  |    |  | Dennis J. Tietz,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INI TI AL REVI EW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15 - 0036 

Post- Focus Draft Revisi on 1 2/9/2015 

ENGI NEER : Prothero \ REC 

.... 
SAT (concer ns) • (10/28/201 4) : 

Re l ated Cases 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING : 2 - 3A 

NOTES & KEY 
INI TI AL REVI EW ENGINEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 1 5 - 0036 

-· 

-

• 
INI TI AL REVI EW ENGINEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 1 5 - 0036 

·-

-· 

-
•
#### Tappan Motors, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*John D. Waterbury, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Westchester County,

January 18, 1971.

Seeker, *Seeker & Seeker (Robert J. Seeker*of counsel), for plaintiff. *Kahn <& Goldman*for defendant.

Robert J. Train or, J.

Motion by plaintiff for an order enjoining’ the defendant pending the trial of the above-captioned action from using the public streets in such a manner as to interfere with the plaintiff’s business so as to destroy plaintiff’s custom, credit and profits, is granted.

Defendant, after certain apparent dissatisfaction with an automobile purchased from plaintiff, parked said vehicle in front of plaintiff’s place of business on November 28, 1970, for about three hours between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. with a sign approximately 3 feet by 4 feet which read as follows:

> “ THIS IS A 1970 VOLVO, PURCHASED FROM TAPP AN MOTORS, OVER 30 REPAIRS STILL NOT FIXED. FOR INFORMATION CALL 235-1523 ”

Plaintiff claims the lettering could be viewed from a distance in excess of 100 feet. It is the contention of plaintiff that such demonstration in front of its business establishment was responsible for customers not entering and that the defendant’s actions were designed expressly to cause this damage to its business. The right to carry on a lawful business without obstruction is a property right, and acts committed without just cause or excuse which interfere with the carrying on of plaintiff’s business or destroy its custom, its credit or its profits, do an irreparable injury and thus authorize the issuance of an injunction. *{Saxon Motor Sales*v. Torino, 166 Misc. 863.)