alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Naval Gun Crew in the Spanish-American War
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

A gun crew prepares to fire a Naval gun in one of the two great naval battles of the Spanish-American War. In the course of helping Cuba win independence from Spain the United States became prominent in world affairs by acquiring a colonial empire (Puerto Rico and Guam) and establishing naval prominence in both oceans. (1898)

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
##### 



First Reserve Fund VIII, L.P.
  
        Amendment of Employment Agreement




---



##### 



Net Reimbursement Amount
 (a)
    
    the amount of the Transaction Bonus; less(b)
    
    the deductible portion of the Transaction Bonus multiplied by the highest
marginal U.S. federal income tax rate (the Federal Tax Rate); less(c)
    
    the deductible portion of the Transaction Bonus apportioned to each state
multiplied by the highest marginal income tax rates for each respective Applicable
State Income Tax (as defined below) (the sum of all such state amounts shall be
referred to as the State Tax Benefit); plus(d)
    
    the State Tax Benefit multiplied by the Federal Tax Rate.
 i.e.
 No Assumption of Liabilities




---



##### 



Governing Law
 No Third Party Beneficiaries
 Miscellaneous
 Very truly yours,
FIRST RESERVE FUND VIII, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnershipBy:
    /s/ Joseph R. EdwardsName:
    Joseph R. EdwardsTitle:
    Vice President /s/ Gus D. HalasGus D. Halas
 
  By:
    
    Michael T. MinoName: Michael T. MinoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,555,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,010,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,977,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,567,000
<PP&E>                                      10,188,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,380,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,483,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,118,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,453,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,483,000
<SALES>                                     12,682,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,682,000
<CGS>                                        8,251,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,251,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,813,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,527,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (753,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            774,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   774,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 115 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-72, CP2024-74.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-26813 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### State v. Beltran.

26096

09/05/2007

Granted

114 Hawai'i 100, 157 P.3d 539
H. Res. 491 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 27, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1090) to 

amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide protections for retail customers, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 

text of Rules Committee Print 114–31 shall be considered as 

adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 

are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; (2) the further amendment printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Lynch of Massachusetts or 

his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of 
2 

•HRES 491 EH 

any point of order, shall be considered as read, shall be separately debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled 

by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject 

to a demand for division of the question; and (3) one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>

 


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To New Image Industries, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-34074, dated
March 29, 1990, of New Image Industries, Inc. of our report dated September 30,
1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of New Image Industries, Inc.
and subsidiary as of June 30, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended June 30, 1996, which report appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Image Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1996.  It should be noted that we have not audited any financial
statements of the Company subsequent to June 30, 1996 or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to June 30, 1996 or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report. 



                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



San Diego, California
September 30, 1996





                                  EXHIBIT 24.1

                                       52
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50246 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUIS RAUL TORRES-JAUREQUI, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-96-CV-09

- - - - - - - - - - March 19, 1998 Before WISDOM, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luis Raul Torres-Jaurequi appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Torres-Jaurequi argues that the district court erred in finding no significant variance between the indictment and the evidence where the indictment accused him of importing methamphetamine into the United States but the evidence shows he never entered into the United States, but remained in customs territory. He further argues that theNo. 97-50246 -2- district court erred in finding that trial counsel had been ineffective for not challenging that variance, for failing to challenge a variation in the Allen charge, and for failing to request an independent lab report of the drugs seized in the offense. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and find that Torres-Jaurequi has not demonstrated error, much less plain error pertaining to the indictment for importation of methamphetamine. See United States v. McPhail , 112 F.3d 197, 199 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 1996 (1995); United States v. Armstrong , 951 F.2d 626 (5th Cir. 1992). As Torres-Jaurequi’s argument concerning the language of the indictment is without merit, he has plainly failed to demonstrate that his defense was prejudiced by counsel’s failure to assert any such error at trial. See Lowery v. Estelle , 696 F.2d 333, 343 (5th Cir. 1983). Torres-Jaurequi also argues that his attorney was ineffective for failing to adequately challenge the modified Allen charge delivered by the court at trial. See Allen v. United States , 164 U.S. 492, 501-02 (1996). We examined that issue on direct appeal and found no error. United States v. Torres-Jaurequi , No. 94-50233 at 5 n.5 (5th Cir. Aug. 3, 1995)(unpublished). As there was no error with regard to the Allen charge, Torres-Jaurequi’s counsel could hardly have been deficient for failing to object to it. See Lowery , 696 F.2d atNo. 97-50246 -3- 343. Similarly, as the Government’s laboratory report showed the substance from Torres-Jaurequi’s car tested positive for approximately 22,000 grams of D-methamphetamine of 86% purity, a demand by counsel for an independent lab report would have proved futile, and there was no plain error in counsel’s not requesting a second report. See McPhail, 112 F.3d at 199; Lowery , 696 F.2d at 343.
AFFIRMED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 06 4

- C R

Style: Shamoon Ahmad

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : June 23 , 201 4

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s response to Anders brief

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 2 , 201 4

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: July 2

, 2014

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: August 1 8 , 2014

 No further extensions of time will be granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant requests an extension of time to file his response and a copy of the

appellate record. We grant appellant’s requests, order the Clerk of this Court to

send a copy of the appellate record to appellant, and order appellant’s response, if

any, be filed no later than August 18, 2014.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: July 17, 2014
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1 - CEO 906 CERTIFICATION

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey M. Stibel,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 7, 2005                  /s/ Jeffrey M. Stibel
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Jeffrey M. Stibel
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00416-CR

JOHN DAVID WAGUESPACK,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-46-C1

ORDER

On November 19, 2013, appellant, John David Waguespack, was convicted of 

sexual assault, a first degree felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011 (West 2011). 

Appellant was sentenced to life in prison. On the same date, appellant filed his notice 

of appeal in this Court. The appellate record was originally due in this appeal on 

January 21, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.2(a) (appellate record must be filed in the 

appellate court within 60 days after the date “the sentence is imposed or suspended in 
Waguespack v. State Page 2

open court or the order appealed from is signed” if a motion for new trial is not filed).1 

On January 22, 2014, the court reporter, Rachell D. Karr, filed a motion for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We granted Karr’s motion for extension 

of time and ordered that the reporter’s record be filed on April 21, 2014. Subsequently, 

on April 21, 2014, Karr filed another motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record requesting a 60 day extension to file the record. We granted Karr’s motion for 

extension of time in part and ordered that the record be filed by June 20, 2014. No 

record has been filed.

It is the joint responsibility of this Court and the trial court to ensure that the 

appellate record is timely filed. Id. at R. 35.3(c). Further, this Court may enter any order 

necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record. Id. Accordingly, we abate 

this appeal and order the trial court to conduct a hearing within 21 days from the date 

of this order to determine a date certain by when the reporter’s record can be filed in a 

manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical 

effect of depriving appellant of his right of appeal.

The court reporter is ordered to file a supplemental reporter’s record with this 

Court containing the transcription of the hearing within seven days of the hearing. 

Further, the district clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s record with this Court 

containing the trial court’s findings and order within seven days of the hearing.

PER CURIAM

 

1 The clerk’s record in this matter has been filed.
Waguespack v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed July 10, 2014
#### Dirks v. Brooks

17601

03/11/2003

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           347,310
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          62
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,035
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      546
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 370,138
<CASH>                                           5,113
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              68,811
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          18,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 628,788
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                420,739
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,585
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 20,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,757
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,481
<OTHER-SE>                                       (315)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   628,788
<PREMIUMS>                                      10,468
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             20,871
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,302
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   8,041
<BENEFITS>                                       9,919
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,592
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            12,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (602)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    502
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
# C_2018166EN.01002502.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the justice de paix de Schaerbeek (Belgium) lodged on 13 March 2018 — Société nationale de chemins de fer belges (SNCB) v Gherasim Sorin Rusu

(Case C-190/18)

(2018/C 166/33)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Justice de paix de Schaerbeek

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société nationale de chemins de fer belges (SNCB)

Applicant:

Defendant: Gherasim Sorin Rusu

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Council Directive 93/13/EC on terms in consumer contracts (1) and Regulation No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (2) apply to relations between the SNCB and passengers caught without a valid ticket?

1

2

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (OJ 2007 L 315, p. 14).

2

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period  ending June 30, 2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  August 16, 2004               /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                     Title: President and Treasurer

                                    A signed original of this written  statement
                                    required by Section 906 has been provided to
                                    CNL  Income  Fund  XII,  Ltd.  and  will  be
                                    retained  by CNL Income Fund XII,  Ltd.  and
                                    furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
                                    Commission or its staff upon request.