alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended March 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,803
<SECURITIES>                                        99
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,945
<PP&E>                                           2,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                     634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,431
<SALES>                                          7,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,624
<CGS>                                            3,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
February 2, 1998

18714

#### State v. Soriano

Reversed
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

JOINDER AGREEMENT 
 August
    , 2018 
 Vanke Service (HongKong) Co., Limited
(萬科物業服務(香港
)有限公司), a Hong Kong limited
company (the “Shareholder”), is executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement pursuant to Section 3.06 of the Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), dated as of August
    , 2018, by and among Cushman & Wakefield plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales (the “Company”), and the stockholders of the Company who are party thereto, in
connection with the acquisition by the Shareholder of the Secondary Shares as defined in and pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, dated July 24, 2018, by and among the Shareholder, DTZ Investment Holdings LP, an English limited
partnership, and the Company. 
 By executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement to the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Shareholder hereby adopts and approves the Registration Rights Agreement and acknowledges, agrees and confirms, effective commencing on the date hereof, to be bound by and to comply with all of the terms, provisions and conditions of the
Registration Rights Agreement, as a Holder (as defined therein) thereunder, and that ordinary shares, nominal value $0.10 per share, of the Company owned or held of record, directly or indirectly, by the Shareholder be subject thereto, in the same
manner as if the Shareholder was an original signatory to the Registration Rights Agreement. 
 This Joinder Agreement shall be governed and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof. This Joinder Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts (including counterparts submitted via facsimile or email),
each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but each of which together shall constitute one and the same document. 
 [Signature Page
Follows] 







 Accordingly, as of the date first written above, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
Joinder Agreement. 
  

			
	 Vanke Service (HongKong) Co., Limited

萬科物業服務(香港)有限公司

		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:


 [Signature Page to Joinder Agreement – Registration Rights Agreement] 








			
	Acknowledged and Accepted:
	
	CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD PLC
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:

 [Signature Page to Joinder Agreement – Registration Rights Agreement]
#### Richard R. BLACK, D.D.S. and Patricia Black, his wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Dr. James S. BOYCE, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14358.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 27, 1976.

*1276M. Dayle Jeffs, of Jeffs & Jeffs, Provo, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Clair M. Aldrich, of Aldrich & Nelson, Provo, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judge-tried case resulting in a no cause of action judgment, in a specific performance case where the parties agreed to buy and sell, on condition, a medical facility. Affirmed, with no costs.

There is no question but that appellants were delinquent in a stock-purchase program for transfer of the facility. Nor does the record reflect anything other than that the defendant tried every which way to carry out the stock transaction by mail, and otherwise, after respondent had left Utah and gone to California.

Appellants say they did not get notice by mail from respondent of a possible sale — which would be no excuse for failure to comply with the contract terms.

It appears that this is the kind of case where someone assumes he should be apprised of his own failure to comply with terms with respect to payments, and then claim a debtor’s so-called right to default unless notified thereof.

The facts of this case, in our opinion, do not lend themselves to successful reversible review, and on this and other grounds we affirm the trial court.

CROCKETT, TUCKETT and ELLETT, JJ., concur.

MAUGHAN, L, concurs in the result.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51244

Conference Calendar

JOHN W MELTON

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH BOYD UNIT; TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION BOYD UNIT; WARDEN II, BOYD UNIT BEN

BROWN; CAPTAIN HORTMAN; LSM III CONNIE HILL; VIRGINIA

BUCHANAN; LVN LYNDA SANCHES

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:06-CV-153

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John W. Melton, Texas prisoner # 1168128, has filed a motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The magistrate judge denied

Melton’s motion to appeal IFP and certified that the appeal was not taken in
No. 06-51244

** Melton consented to the magistrate judge entering the final judgment

in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

2

good faith.** By moving for IFP, Melton is challenging the district court’s

certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Failure to identify an error in the district court’s analysis is the same as

if the appellant had not appealed the judgment. Brinkmann v. Dallas County

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Although pro se briefs

are liberally construed, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to

preserve them. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Melton offers only a conclusory assertion of perjured testimony at the

Spears*** hearing to challenge the dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Melton

has not shown that the magistrate judge’s determination that his appeal would

be frivolous was incorrect. The instant appeal is without arguable merit and is

thus frivolous. Accordingly, Melton’s request for IFP status is denied, and his

appeal is dismissed. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-220 (5th Cir. 1983);

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Melton is reminded that he has three strikes under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996);

Melton v. Livingston, No. 06-20097 (5th Cir. Jan. 18, 2007). Accordingly, he may

not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See § 1915(g). We caution Melton that further frivolous filings may

result in additional sanctions against him.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Appraisal Template

In a narrative format, state your justification and method of valuation. Use a table similar to the one below to list out the animals, values, and reference documents. Submit all reference documents and show your work. Future lost income is not considered for indemnity purposes. Animal categories for valuation should match the categories on the VS1-23. 

1. Appraiser qualifications:

2. For each indemnity value given (whether for an individual animal or group of animals), specify the ID(s) for the animal or group of animals, the type of animal or animals, the valuation method used (either sales comparison or cost approach) for the specific animal or animals, and reference and include copies of the specific document or documents being used to support that specific indemnity value and any calculations done. (Note: all values must have documentation.)

3. Statement of appraiser independence:

Signature of appraiser:

Print name: 

Contact information:

# image1.png
# C_2019065EN.01002001.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul de Arbitraj Instituţionalizat Galaţi (Romania) lodged on 5 June 2018 — Uniunea Naţională a Barourilor din România v Marcel-Vasile Holunga

(Case C-370/18)

(2019/C 65/25)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul de Arbitraj Instituţionalizat Galaţi

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Uniunea Naţională a Barourilor din România

Defendant: Marcel-Vasile Holunga

By Order of 13 December 2018, the Court (Eighth Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling manifestly inadmissible.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ MICHAEL L. BENNETT
    
    /s/ FRANCIS G. MEYERMichael L. Bennett
    
    Francis G. MeyerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial andDirector (Principal Executive Officer)
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Dated: July 31, 2007
    
    Dated: July 31, 2007
SCWC-12-0000690 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. COBY JONES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000690; CR. NO. 08-1-0170) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By : Reck tenwal d, C.J ., Nak ayama, Mc Ken na, Po lla ck, an d W ils on, JJ .)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on July 1, 2014, by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Coby Jones, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 12, 2014. James S. Tabe for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000690 12-AUG-2014 01:35 PM
#### State v. Ortiz

22429

10/23/2000

Affirmed
Order No. 97-37

19223

April 24, 1997

#### State v. Menor

Affirmed
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 

valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0036. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average

1.7 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 

collection of information.

OMB APPROVED

0579-0036

This record is authorized by law (7 U.S.C. 2131-2156 and 9 CFR, Subchapter A, Parts 1, 2, and 3). Failure to maintain this record can result in a suspension or revocation of license and/or imprisonment for 

not more than 1 year, or a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE

CONTINUATION SHEET FOR

RECORD OF ACQUISITION, DISPOSITION OR TRANSPORT 

OF ANIMALS

(Other Than Dogs and Cats) 

1. INVOICE NUMBER 2. PAGE

OF 

3. DATE OF DISPOSITION

4. CERTIFICATE NUMBER

SALE EXCHANGE OR TRANSFER DONATION

5. SELLER OR DONOR NAME 6. BUYER OR RECEIVER NAME

8. IDENTIFICATION OF ANIMALS BEING DELIVERED

A.

CONTAINER TAG 

NUMBER, 

CRATE OR

PEN NUMBER

B.

NUMBER 

OF 

ANIMALS

C.

PREVIOUS 

INVOICE 

NUMBER

(if any)

D.

INDIVIDUAL 

IDENTIFICATION, 

TATTOOS, TAG 

NUMBERS

(if applicable)

E.

SPECIES

AGE - SEX H.

EST. 

WEIGHT 

(lbs) 

I.

REMARKS

(Condition, etc.)

RECEIVER’S USE

F.

NUMBER 

OF 

YOUNG

G.

NUMBER 

OF 

ADULT

J. K.

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

M F M F

APHIS FORM 7020A 

NOV 2020
EXHIBIT 12



COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                       |  |                                                         |  |                                  |  |                                  |  |                                  |  |                                  |  |                                 
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|                                       |  | Forty-six Weeks from May 7, 1999 through March 27, 2000 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 26, 2001 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 25, 2002 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2003 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 29, 2004 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1) |  |                                                        |  |                                 |  |                                 |  | 1.9x                             |  | 1.5x                             |  | 1.0x                            

---

|(1) | The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing earnings available for fixed charges (income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary items plus fixed
charges) by fixed charges (interest expense plus that portion of rental expense deemed to represent interest and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs). For fiscal years 2002 and 2001, and period from May 7, 1999 through March 27, 2000,
historical earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $18.5, $8.4 million and $17.6 million, respectively.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10404 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Shawn Anton Lambert**

**- Duck,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 104

- 1

Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The attorney representing Shawn Anton Lambert

- Duck has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lambert

- Duck has not filed a response but has moved for the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 5, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce C lerk Case: 20-10404 Document: 00515849396 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2021No. 20

- 10404

2 appointment of substitute counsel

. That motion is **DENIED**

. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRAN TED**  , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5 th Cir. R.**  42. Case: 20-10404 Document: 00515849396 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2021
September 15, 2000

22529

#### State v. Jove

Affirmed
#### State v. Moefu

18487

10/31/96

Affirmed
Product Monitoring Mission 

To clarify the benefits and risks of using veterinary 

biological products under real life conditions, we will 

maintain a program which will:

 Conduct ongoing post-marketing surveillance to 

 detect emerging situations 

 estimate reference norms 

 monitor trends 

 Implement special epidemiological studies to evaluate 

issues raised by routine surveillance 

 Organize data to 

 base decisions and select actions 

 inform consumers 

 maintain public confidence
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86159-86160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's (NSB) NSB-NSF Commission on Merit 
Review hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a videoconference 
meeting for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant 
to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, December 13, 2023, from 12:00-1:30 p.m. 
Eastern.

PLACE: This meeting will be held in person and by videoconference 
through the National Science Foundation headquarters at 2415 Eisenhower 
Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS: One portion open and one portion closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    Open: 12:00-1:00 p.m. Matters to be considered--Commission Chair's 
opening remarks; Discussion of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and

[[Page 86160]]

Accessibility in Merit Review; Closing remarks.
    Closed: 1:00-1:30 p.m. Matters to be considered--Chairman's opening 
remarks regarding the agenda; Discussion of data collection workplan 
and instruments; Closing remarks.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: (Chris Blair, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#680b0a0409011a28061b0e460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6003020c010912200e13064e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>), 703/292-7000. Members of the public 
can observe the public portion of this meeting through a YouTube 
livestream. The YouTube link will be available from the NSB web page.

Ann E. Bushmiller,
Senior Legal Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-27278 Filed 12-8-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: January 9, 2004

/s/ Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
-------------------------
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

                                       59