alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 65 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 65

    Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural 
           Resources in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2015

   Mr. Bishop of Utah submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural 
           Resources in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Natural Resources (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $13,573,844 for the One Hundred 
Fourteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,786,922 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2015, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2016; and
            (2) not more than $6,786,922 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2016, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2017.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.8





Current Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2011





Base Salaries





The base salaries for 2011 for the following executive officers of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and Great Southern Bank (the "Bank") currently are as follows:





Name and Title
Base SalaryWilliam V. Turner
$200,000Chairman of the Board ofthe Company and the BankJoseph W. Turner
$285,250President and ChiefExecutive Officer of theCompany and the BankRex A. Copeland
$247,200Treasurer of the Companyand Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the BankSteven G. Mitchem
$234,600Senior Vice President and ChiefLending Officer of the BankDouglas W. Marrs
$130,000Secretary of the Company andSecretary, Vice President – Operationsof the BankLinton J. Thomason
$123,420Vice President–Information Servicesof the Bank





Description of Bonus Arrangements





Pursuant to their employment agreements with the Company, each of Messrs. William V. Turner and Joseph W. Turner is entitled to an annual cash bonus equal to one-half of one percent of the Company's pre-tax net income.  For certain executive officers whose bonus arrangements are not governed by contract, the Company has maintained an incentive bonus arrangement under which the officers may earn a cash bonus of up to 15% of the officer's annual base salary, with up to 7.5% based on the extent to which the Company achieves targeted earnings per share results and up to 7.5% based on the officer's individual performance.  Messrs. Marrs and Thomason are the only executive officers currently eligible to participate in this arrangement as a result of the Company's participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Asian American Achievements Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Sugar Maple

Year
    2010

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Acer saccharum*
(Sugar Maple)

Sponsored by
Rep. Frank R. Wolf

To Honor Contributions and Achievements of
Asian Americans to American Business, Culture and Society

May 25, 2010 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 24.17
                                   CERTIFICATE

      I, Marilyn S. Kirkland,  Secretary of Southwestern Electric Power Company,
a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby certify that set forth below
is a complete and accurate copy of a certain  resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors of the  Corporation  on this 26th day of January,  2000, and that such
resolution is in full force and effect as of the date of this certificate.


                       Southwestern Electric Power Company
                          Board of Directors Resolution
                                January 26, 2000

      RESOLVED,  that each officer of Southwestern Electric Power Company listed
at the end of this  sentence  is  hereby  authorized  to  make,  constitute  and
appoint,  in his  respective  capacity,  a power  of  attorney  in  favor of the
person(s)  listed  directly after his name at the end of this  sentence,  as his
true and lawful  attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power and authority
(and in the case of more than one attorney-in-fact, each attorney-in-fact acting
alone  and  without  the  other)  to  execute  in the name and on  behalf of the
officer, in any and all capacities, the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 1999 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be filed under the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other  documents  and  instruments
incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all  exhibits  thereto and all
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and grant to such  attorney(s)-in-fact,  and  agent(s)  (and in the case of more
than  one  attorney-in-fact,   each  of  them),  full  power  and  authority  of
substitution  and  revocation in the premises and full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing  requisite  and necessary to be done in
and about the  premises,  as fully and all intents  and  purposes as the officer
might or could do in person.

1.    Michael H.  Madison is  authorized  to make,  constitute  and appoint R.
      Russell Davis to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.
2.    R. Russell Davis is authorized to make,  constitute and appoint  Michael
      H. Madison to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Southwestern Electric Power Company this day, the 26th of January, 2000.



      /s/ Marilyn S. Kirkland
          Marilyn S. Kirkland





      CORPORATE SEAL
January 15, 1998

19887

#### Rose v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Affirmed
Annex 22. Item 6.11. – Article 9.3.2. of Chapter 9.3. Infection with decapod iridescent virus 1

CHAPTER 9.3.

INFECTION WITH DECAPOD IRIDESCENT VIRUS 1

[...]

Article 9.3.2.

Scope

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5. ~~[~~fleshy prawn (*Penaeus chinensis*), gazami crab (*Portunus trituberculatus*), giant river prawn (*Macrobrachium rosenbergii*), kuruma prawn (*Penaeus japonicus*), oriental river prawn (*Macrobrachium nipponense*), red claw crayfish (*Cherax quadricarinatus*), red swamp crawfish (*Procambarus clarkii*), ridgetail prawn (*Exopalaemon carinicauda*) and white~~-~~leg shrimp (*Penaeus vannamei*)~~, giant tiger prawn (*Penaeus monodon*), red claw crayfish (*Cherax quadricarinatus*), giant freshwater prawn (*Macrobrachium rosenbergii*), red swamp crayfish (*Procambarus clarkii*),~~~~oriental river prawn (*Macrobrachium nipponense*) and ridgetail white prawn (*Exopalaemon carinicauda*)] (under study)~~.

[...]

____________
October 26, 1998

21342

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
# C_2019148EN.01001101.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/11

---

Appeal brought on 28 December 2018 by Mamas and Papas Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 23 October 2018 in Case T-672/17: Mamas and Papas v EUIPO

(Case C-825/18 P)

(2019/C 148/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Mamas and Papas Ltd (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, B. Whitehead, J. Dainty, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-672/17, Mamas and Papas Ltd v EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-672/17, Mamas and Papas Ltd v EUIPO;

| — | give judgment on the issue of prior disclosure; |
| --- | --- |

—

give judgment on the issue of prior disclosure;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union on the remaining pleas in law that were brought before the General Court but not resolved by that Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union on the remaining pleas in law that were brought before the General Court but not resolved by that Court;

| — | order the Office and intervener to bear their own costs and pay those of the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office and intervener to bear their own costs and pay those of the appellant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

First the General Court erred in law regarding the powers of the EUIPO to examine the facts under Article 63(1) CDR (1) in relation to disclosure of the prior design. Where prior disclosure is positively averred by the design holder, it is not open to the EUIPO to come to a different conclusion on that issue.

Secondly, in any event, as regards its assessment of the evidence of prior disclosure the General Court distorted the evidence and incorrectly assessed the facts, and its decision contains a substantive inaccuracy in the findings attributable to the documents submitted to it which is clear from the case file.

---

(1)  11 Council Regulation (EC) No. 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community Designs (OJ 2002, L 3, p. 1).

---
18978

#### Okuno v. Administrative Director

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


    We hereby consent to the inclusion of the information incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statements of Equity Compression Services
Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74640 and 333-23925) with
respect to the oil and gas reserve information of the Company included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                   LEE KEELING AND ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                   BY: /s/ KENNETH RENBERG
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth Renberg
                                           Vice President


Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 26, 1997
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Battle of Lexington
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Filippo Costaggini

Year
    1877

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

British troops fire on colonists, who had gathered at Lexington to stop them from going on to Concord to destroy a colonial supply depot. Major Pitcairn, the British officer on horseback, had ordered the colonists to disarm and disperse. As they began to do so, a single shot was fired, which led to an exchange of fire between a British platoon and the colonial militia. Eight militiamen were killed and ten wounded before Pitcairn regained control of his troops. Thus the American Revolution started, with "the shot heard round the world." (1775)

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                             27,528
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   27,528
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     27,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,458
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           63,125
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       27,528
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    5,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (5,754) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.02)


        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7045

SAUL WILLIAMS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

JON OZMINT, Director of Corr of State of South Carolina,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00923-HMH)

Submitted: October 23, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Saul Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Saul Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006). We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on June 18, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on June 11, 

2012. Because Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We deny Williams’ motion for a certificate 

of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:            |  |                            
|---------------- |  | ---------------------------
|January 23, 2007 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                 |  |                            
|                 |  | Marc. N. Teal              
|                 |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Sola Optical, notes from 11/8/11 conversation with Herb Levine

Dante Rodriguez to: Dante Rodriguez 02/08/2012 12:21 PM

Tuesday, 11/8/12

Conversation with Herb Levine

Talked with Herb about what to do with Sola. Herb says that to prove we can close site we would 

need at least 2 years of data showing the cleanup goal was met. Since we have one data point from last 

year that was below MCL, if we get more this year that confirms it, then we could make a good case.

The PRPs did not perform the required 2 sampling events last year or this year. They only did one 

event in 2010 and none yet in 2011. Had they done the 3 events as they were supposed to, and all 

confirmed the 2010 result, then we would have had a robust enough data set to justify closure.

The NCP says that throughout the plume the cleanup standard generally must be met. HQ just 

started working on guidance for "exit strategies," basically an interpretation of that. Don't expect it anytime 

soon.

To hasten closure, we can have the PRPs do the 3 sampling events, mentioned above, in a 

compressed timeframe, like monthly for a quarter. Of course, if the first such monthly event does not come 

in below MCL, then we should cancel the other monthly events. The point would be to confirm the MCL is 

met. If not met, go back to semi-annual sampling.

I will follow-up by contacting the PRP contractor, then write a letter to the PRP about how they are 

behind in sampling and propose this closure idea.

Dante Rodriguez, P.E.

Remedial Project Manager

U.S. EPA Region 9

(415) 972-3166

rodriguez.dante@epa.gov

SDMS DOCID# 1138658