alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Reagents and Proficiency Tests From

NVSL

Last Modified: 

Print

Diagnostic reagents are produced by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories

(NVSL) as needed for veterinary diagnostic use when a commercial source of

reagent is not available or when commercial sources are not fulfilling diagnostic

needs. Proficiency testing is offered for diagnostics associated with USDA program

diseases, as well as other diseases requiring APHIS laboratory approval, and quality

control purposes.

Items requested from the NVSL catalog may not be available or may be limited in

quantity at any time due to domestic testing or production priorities.

Quick Links

NVSL Reagent Catalog 

Reagent Request Form 

Kit/Instrument Catalog 

Kit/Instrument Request Form 

Questions about ordering? First-time customer?

Visit Ordering Reagents and Proficiency Tests
Reagents

Catalog of reagents. Text in the PDF-format reagent catalog is fully searchable.

When the catalog displays, click the search feature (binoculars icon) in the

Adobe Acrobat toolbar or CTRL+F to type in keywords.

Special instructions on ordering USDA Swine Surveillance Influenza A virus

isolates from the USDA repository

Information about shipping and permits can be found at Ordering Reagents and

Proficiency Tests. Contact the laboratory at nvslinfo@usda.gov or 515-337-7266

if you are unsure if the reagent you are ordering requires a permit.

Unfamiliar with an abbreviation or acronym in the catalog? See definitions.

Safety Data Sheets for Sample Media Provided by the NVSL

Proficiency Testing

Proficiency Test Panels Available From the NVSL

Quality Assurance

Reference materials and proficiency tests produced at the NVSL are accredited to

ISO 17043 and ISO Guide 34. Learn more about the NVSL Quality Management

System and the scope of accredited materials.

APHIS-Approved Laboratories

Ordering reagents for certain diseases requires that the laboratory be approved to

perform that testing. See the list of APHIS- approved facilities.
Unit of Measure Use and Conversion for Data Entry into LSRTIS 

ICWI0710.01 Page 1 of 1 

Issuing Authority: Renee M. Schnurr 

Issue Date: 18Mar11 

Expiration Date: 18Mar14 

Source Document and Edition or Date of Issue: ICSOP0010.01, Processing Serial Records, and VS 

Memorandum 800.53, Release of Biological Products 

The purpose of this work instruction is to provide guidance for which unit of measure to 

use when entering inventories from the APHIS Form 2008 into LSRTIS. Also this will 

provide information regarding the conversion of units from an unauthorized form to one 

of the units of measure used for serial release purposes. 

Unit of Measure to Use 

Type of Product Typical Codes Unit of Measure 

Final Use Vaccine, MLV or Killed 13D1.20, 1761.17, 1905.24 Doses 

Final Use Bacterin 2648.00 Doses 

Final Use Combination Products 47E5.21, 44C5.20 Doses 

Autogenous Virus and Bacterin 1015.00, 2051.00, 4500.00 Doses 

But can use ML 

Diagnostic Test Kits 5006.00, 5018.00 Units 

FFM products A231.12, B772.00 ML 

FFM bursal products A2B9.40 ML 

Antibody Products 3606.00, 3750.20 Doses 

But can use ML 

Allergenic Extracts 9521.00 ML 

Immunostimulants and Misc 9300.00 Doses 

But can use ML 

 

Note: Some liquid products (bacterins especially) may have more than one dose 

size. For example, Est. 345, Code 7901.01 has a 2-mL dose size for cattle and a 

1-mL dose size for swine. They report inventories in ML. In this case it would be 

appropriate to use ML. 

Conversion Chart 

On 2008 Convert by Enter into LSRTIS 

1 KG Multiple by 1000 1000 ML 

1 g (gram) No math needed 1 ML 

1 cc No math needed 1 ML 

1 L Multiple by 1000 1000 ML 

1 bursae 1 gram 1 ML
#### Rhodes *v.*Ashley.

No. 4950.

February 19, 1926.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Malcolm D. Jones. Bibb superior court. January 26, 1925.

*Hunter & Daley*and *James L. Wimberly,*for plaintiff.

*J. D. Hughes*and *D. W. McCoy,*for defendant.

Russell, C. J.

Under the evidence the court should have submitted the case to the jury, and the trial judge erred in granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices eoneur.*
May 17, 2002

24013

#### State v. Jim

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.2

   FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND


NEW YORK, NY:  September 22, 2009 - Financial Federal Corporation
(NYSE:FIF) today announced its Board of Directors declared a $0.15
per share quarterly dividend on its common stock.  The dividend is
payable October 23, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on October 9, 2009.  The dividend rate is the same as the
prior quarter.


Financial Federal Corporation is an independent financial services
company specializing in financing construction, road transportation
and refuse equipment through installment sales and leasing programs
for dealers, manufacturers and end users nationwide.  Please visit
www.financialfederal.com for more information.


CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth
          Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE VI

JUSTICE

JUSTICE

Article 47

Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.

Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented.

Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.

---
142 P.3d 1284

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Wong v. Cayetano

27117

08/28/2006

Denied

111 Hawai'i 462, 143 P.3d 1
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/13/2012 04:50 PM

Subject: Edit to sentence on p.115 of section III on PM NFR

Nathan, 

Below is an edit to the language on page 115 of Section III related to near-road monitoring. I believe it is 

responsive to the issue we discussed. Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Lydia

The EPA does not agree with the comment that siting some monitors in near roadway 

environments makes the standard more stringent or impermissibly more stringent. As discussed 

in section VIII.B.3.b.i below, a significant fraction of the population lives in proximity to major 

roads, and these exposures occur in locations that represent ambient air. Monitoring in such areas 

does not make the standard more stringent than warranted, but rather affords the intended 

protection to the exposed populations, among them at-risk populations, exposed to fine particles 

in these areas. Thus, the EPA has made a determination that in cases where monitors in near 

roadway environments are deemed to be representative of area-wide air quality they would be

compared to the annual standard (as discussed more fully below in section VIII). The 24-hour 

and annual NAAQS are designed to protect the public with an adequate margin of safety, and 

this siting provision is fully consistent with providing the protection the standard is designed to 

provide and does not make the standard more stringent or more stringent than necessary.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Animal Product Imports

Last Modified: 

Print

If you are importing animal products, byproducts, or products exposed to animalsourced materials into the United States, there are import and permit requirements

you need to follow.

APHIS Veterinary Services (VS) regulates the importation of animals and animalderived materials to ensure they do not introduce foreign animal diseases into the

United States.

If the animal products you're importing are for human consumption, you may also

need to meet requirements from USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service. These

are in addition to APHIS requirements described below.

VS Import Requirements

Generally, you need a VS permit for materials derived from animals or exposed to

animal-source materials.

Veterinary Services Permitting Assistant

Veterinary Services Permitting Assistant
The VS Permitting Assistant has the most updated and comprehensive

information about which products do or do not require a VS import permit.

For exported products returning to the United States, learn about the reentry

process by using the VS Permitting Assistant as well. Be sure to follow all steps and

instructions.

New to eFile or the VS Permitting Assistant? Visit APHIS eFile Permitting Resources

and Training.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection will

review all imported animal products at the port of entry, including those that do not

require an import permit.

Note: VS charges user fees for most import and export work, including permitting.

For details, visit VS Import and Export User Fees.

I Want To...

Apply for an import permit 

Use APHIS eFile to submit and track your permit applications, apply for renewals and

amendments, and receive a copy of the permit.

Learn about permitting for organisms and vectors 

APHIS regulates the import and interstate transport of organisms and vectors of

pathogenic diseases of livestock and poultry.

Submit an import declaration 

Learn how and when to file APHIS-required import data in the Automated

Commercial Environment (ACE).

Bring animal or animal-derived products into the United States in passenger

baggage 

Visit our page on traveling with food or agricultural products.
Find or become an approved establishment for processing animal trophies, hides, or

feathers 

Learn what items need special processing at an approved establishment, find an

approved establishment, and learn how to become an approved establishment.

Find an APHIS-approved establishment for the import of meat and casings 

See our list of approved foreign entities.

Apply for an Animal Health Permit by Email

Latest Updates

--  --

Need Help?

Animal Product Imports

For general requests:

Animal Product Import and Export Team

Email: apie@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-3300

Note:

Email is preferred.

AQI Veterinary Medical Officers
Use the dropdown menu to find contact information for your nearest Agricultural

Quarantine and Inspection (AQI) veterinary medical officer.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

Animal Product Imports Contacts
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 639 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 639

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 17, 2016.
    Resolved, That the Speaker is authorized to appear as amicus curiae on 
behalf of the House of Representatives in the Supreme Court in the matter of 
United States, et al. v. Texas, et al., No. 15-674, and to file a brief in 
support of the position that the petitioners have acted in a manner that is not 
consistent with their duties under the Constitution and laws of the United 
States.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker shall notify the House of Representatives of a decision 
to file one or more briefs as amicus curiae pursuant to this resolution.
    Sec. 3.  The Office of General Counsel of the House of Representatives, at 
the direction of the Speaker, shall represent the House in connection with the 
filing of any brief as amicus curiae pursuant to this resolution, including 
supervision of any outside counsel providing services to the Speaker on a pro 
bono basis for such purpose.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Veterinary Services National Training

and Exercise Program

Last Modified: 

Print

We offer dozens of training webinars, videos, and exercises for first responders,

States, Tribes, and others. Our trainings cover a host of topics to help you prepare

for and respond to animal disease emergencies.

Veterinary Services Training and Exercise Plan

Our multiyear training and exercise plan follows the principles of the National

Incident Management System preparedness cycle and the Homeland Security

Exercise Evaluation Program.

Veterinary Services National Training and Exercise Program (VS NTEP): Strategy and

Plan, Fiscal Years 2024–2026 

Available VS NTEP Exercise Materials 

VS NTEP Resource Guide 

Webinar and Video Gallery

Browse by topic below or view our full playlist of webinar recordings and training

videos.
Animal Disease 

Aquaculture 

Basic Radiological Incident Awareness 

Cattle 

Emergency Management 

Foreign Animal Disease 
HPAI Lessons Learned 

Industry 

National Veterinary Stockpile 

Poultry 

Secure Food Supply 

Small Ruminants 
Swine 

National Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Program
CHAPTER 10.10.**INFECTION WITH VIRAL HAEMORRHAGIC SEPTICAEMIA VIRUS**

[...]

Article 10.10.2.

**Scope**

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.~~: rainbow trout *(Oncorhynchus mykiss)*, brown trout *(Salmo trutta)*, grayling *(Thymallus thymallus)*, white fish (*Coregonus*spp.), pike *(Esox lucius)*, turbot *(Scophthalmus maximus)*, herring and sprat (*Clupea*spp.), Pacific salmon (*Oncorhynchus*spp.), Atlantic cod *(Gadus morhua)*, Pacific cod *(Gadus macrocephalus)*, haddock *(Gadus aeglefinus)*and rockling *(Onos mustelus)*. These recommendations also apply to any other~~*~~susceptible species~~*~~referred to in the~~*~~Aquatic Manual~~*~~when traded internationally.~~

__________________________
#### Ambrose, Appellant, *v.*Ambrose, Appellee.

(No. 31646

Decided January 26, 1949.)

*Mr. Thomas E. Antonelli*and *Mr. James B. Geris,*for appellant.

*Mr. Harold H. Hull*and *Mr. William P. Barnum,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Hart, Stewart, Turner and Tapt? JJ., concur.

Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., not participating.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-1296]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Navinta LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
                        **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**
                         listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before January 23, 2024. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before January 23, 2024.
 ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*. If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on September 27, 2023, Navinta LLC, 1499 Lower Ferry Road, Ewing, New Jersey 08618-1414, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
SchedulePentobarbital
2270
IILevomethorphan
9210
IILevorphanol
9220
IIRemifentanil
9739
II
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances for validation purposes as part of the Food Administration approval process before distributing to their customers. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Claude Redd, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-25991 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT21**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

**Parent**

First Financial Service Corporation
|                                                 | ** ** | **State of** | ** ** | **Percentage** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------|------------|----------------|------------|
| **Subsidiaries**                                | ** ** | **Incorporation** | ** ** | **Owned**      | ** ** |
|                                            |       |              |       |           |       |
| First Federal  Savings Bank of Elizabethtown    |       | Kentucky          |       | 100            | %          |
|                                            |       |              |       |           |       |
| First Service  Corporation of Elizabethtown (a) |       | Kentucky          |       | 100            | %          |
|                                            |       |              |       |           |       |
| First Federal  Office Park, LLC (a)             |       | Kentucky          |       | 100            | %          |
|                                            |       |              |       |           |       |
| First Federal Statutory  Trust 1 (a)            |       | Kentucky          |       | 100            | %          |

 

----

(a)  Wholly-owned subsidiaries ofFirst Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown.

----
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 58 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 

in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. THORNBERRY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Armed Services in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Armed Serv4 ices (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $15,869,093 for the One Hundred Four9 teenth Congress. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 58 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,841,250.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2015, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2016; and 

7 (2) not more than $8,027,843 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2016, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2017. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
26561

#### State v. Hulama

Affirmed
# C_2018311EN.01000802.xml

| 3.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 20 June 2018 — PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

(Case C-406/18)

(2018/C 311/08)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PG

Defendant: Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/3[2]/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that it is possible for effective judicial protection to be guaranteed in a Member State even if its courts cannot amend decisions given in asylum procedures but may only annul them and order that a new procedure be conducted? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/3[2]/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that it is possible for effective judicial protection to be guaranteed in a Member State even if its courts cannot amend decisions given in asylum procedures but may only annul them and order that a new procedure be conducted?

| 2. | Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/3[2]/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, again in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that legislation of a Member State which lays down a single mandatory time limit of 60 days in total for judicial proceedings in asylum matters, irrespective of any individual circumstances and without regard to the particular features of the case or any potential difficulties in relation to evidence, is compatible with those provisions? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 31 of Directive 2013/3[2]/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (known as the ‘Procedures Directive’) be interpreted, again in the light of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as meaning that legislation of a Member State which lays down a single mandatory time limit of 60 days in total for judicial proceedings in asylum matters, irrespective of any individual circumstances and without regard to the particular features of the case or any potential difficulties in relation to evidence, is compatible with those provisions?

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

---