alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-12-1996
<CASH>                                          930000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 49955000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  184375000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             260395000
<PP&E>                                       157296000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               716787000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        158190000
<BONDS>                                      310379000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        907000
<OTHER-SE>                                   244607000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 716787000
<SALES>                                      674539000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             674539000
<CGS>                                        417707000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                417707000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             233947000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            10761000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               12124000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  25955000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (13831000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (13831000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 224

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ THE STATE OF TEXAS , A ppellant ,

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY VARGAS , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to abate and remand and

motion to dismiss. On June 17, 2022, a ppellant, the State of Texas, by and through its
Criminal District Attorney, Honorable Luis V. Saenz , filed a motion to dismiss its appeal
pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.2(a). No decision of this Cou rt having been delivered to date, we grant the motion and2 dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s motion to abate and remand is denied as

moot
, and the entire appeal is hereby dismissed.

CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 30th day of June , 202 2

.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-13210

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00227-GAP-GJK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES CARL DORON WILLIAMS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 19, 2017)

Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Baghdadi, appointed counsel for James Williams in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 16-13210 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because 

we have concluded that no arguable issues of merit exist, Williams’s motions for 

appointment of new counsel and relief under Fed. R. App. P. 31 are DENIED as 

moot.

Case: 16-13210 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
10.49.3
 
 Handelsbanken
 
 Loan numberBorrower
    
    Customer numberMOBITEC AKTIEBOLAG
   From 
2010-03-31
    
    
    Amount
0
    
    

þ SEK
    
    
    EUR
    
    
    From
2010-09-30
    
    
    Amount
1,500,000
    
    
    þ SEK
    
    

EUR
    Account number
    
    If an account number is stated, it implies an
agreement that amounts due are paid by the
bank debiting the account on the due date. The
agreed due date will apply even if it is not a
business day. The borrower is responsible for
the required amount being available on the
account on the due date.SignatureDate
    
    Signature of borrower2010-03-25
    
    MOBITEC AB/s/ Agne AxelssonApproval by guarantor and/or pledger who is not the borrower if the amortisation plan is
changedDate
    
    Signature of borrower/pledgerDate
    
    Signature of borrower/pledgerDate
    
    Signature of borrower/pledgerDate
    
    Signature of borrower/pledgerDate
    
    Signature of borrower/pledger
 Signature of branch manager or equivalent
    
    The documentation is correct
    
    The change has been registered for the loanDate
    
    Signature
    
    Date
    
    Signature
# OAR Box 1867 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 74 ) ll-B-12 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/2/20086:27:23 AM Sheet 74of 95 P. 1

.P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-12 8 

## PENDING CONFIDENTI A

Th e following informatio n i s locate d inV**are-Gon-t-i-cterrtTa j file s o f th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia n Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , Novembe r 1991 , HO NNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/Benzotrichloride . 1 9 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-128 .
# 012512_1-10-3120

30.798603
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Bacteria, Fungi, Nematodes,

Phytoplasmas and Viruses

Last Modified: 

Print

USDA regulates the importation and interstate movement of plant pathogens by

requiring permits (codified at 7 CFR 330.200 to 330.212). Generally, plant pathogens

are recognized as bacteria, fungi, nematodes, phytoplasmas, viroids, viruses, and

similar/allied organisms. But for the purposes of this regulation, plant pathogens also

include non-genetically engineered infectious substances which can directly or

indirectly injure, cause disease, or damage in any plants, plant parts, or plant

products.

If the organism is imported on/in host material, no separate permit is required if the

host material is not intended for propagation. Most permits for domestic movement

and importation are issued for 3 years. The application could be processed in as little

as 30 days but there are many factors which cause the review process to take

longer. These factors include, but are not limited to: the need for a facility

inspection, the need to obtain additional equipment or equipment certifications, or

the need for additional information by PPQ or your State Department of Agriculture.

All PPQ 526 permit applications are submitted to the destination states(s) for review.

The PPQ staff process permits in the order they are received and recommend that

you apply for your permit four to six months in advance. 

Apply for a Permit - Use PPQ Form 526, Application for permit to move live plant

pests or noxious weeds 
Information for..

Shipping Requirements and Red and White Labels

Inspections

Intrastate Movement

Containment Facility Inspection

Importation of Plant Growth Enhancers 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's) About...

Pathogens FAQs 

View a list of the commonly asked questions and concerns associated with the

application process for a Plant Pathogen permit.

Fungi, Mushrooms and Mushroom Spawn FAQ's 

View a list of the commonly asked questions and concerns associated with the

application process in reference to a fungi, mushroom and mushroom spawn permit.

Nematodes FAQ's 

View a list of the commonly asked questions and concerns associated with the

application process in reference to nematodes.

Permit Eligibility for Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Workers 

Permit Eligibility Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Workers

Learn More
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 652 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 652

 Recognizing the Nordic Heritage Museum in Seattle, Washington, as the 
              National Nordic Museum of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2016

 Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Heck of Washington, and Mr. Reichert) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the Nordic Heritage Museum in Seattle, Washington, as the 
              National Nordic Museum of the United States.

Whereas Nordic peoples have long contributed to the rich cultural heritage of 
        the United States;
Whereas Seattle has an undeniable connection to Scandinavia, hosting a 
        population with strong Nordic roots;
Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum is dedicated to preserving and celebrating an 
        immigrant culture critical not only to the founding of Washington State, 
        but also of the United States; and
Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum is the only museum in the United States to 
        honor the legacy of immigrants from the five Nordic countries of 
        Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the Nordic 
Heritage Museum as the National Nordic Museum of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Leo D. Cohen, Doing Business as Redaco & Co., Respondent, *v.*Frank Carroll et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 6, 1971.

*Growman & Flaum (Emanuel Growman*of counsel), for appellants. *Goodman & Mabel & Kirsch (Michael M. Kirsch*of counsel), for respondent.

Final judgment affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Lupiano and Gold, JJ.
May 26, 2000

22507

#### State v. Tamayo

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 544 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 544

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
  should submit any binding and universal agreement on climate change 
  adopted at the Conference of the Parties (``COP21'') of the United 
   Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Senate as a 
   treaty under article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2015

  Mr. Yoho (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Walker, Mr. Benishek, and Mr. 
Fitzpatrick) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
  should submit any binding and universal agreement on climate change 
  adopted at the Conference of the Parties (``COP21'') of the United 
   Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Senate as a 
   treaty under article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution.

Whereas the United States is one of 196 countries that are parties to the United 
        Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (``Convention'');
Whereas from November 30 to December 11, 2015, the United States will be 
        participating in the twenty-first session of the Conference of the 
        Parties (``COP21'') of the Convention in Paris, France;
Whereas, according to the organizing committee of COP21, the objective of COP21 
        is to achieve a binding and universal agreement on climate from all 
        countries of the world;
Whereas statements by United States Special Envoy for Climate Change, Todd 
        Stern, and other United States Government officials indicate that 
        President Obama does not intend to submit the agreement that results 
        from COP21 to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification of 
        the agreement; and
Whereas the Constitution clearly states in article II, section 2, clause 2 that 
        the President is empowered to propose and negotiate agreements between 
        the United States and other countries only with the advice and consent 
        of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the President should submit any binding and universal agreement on 
climate change adopted at the Conference of the Parties (``COP21'') of 
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Senate 
as a treaty under article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<CIK> 0000762129
<NAME> CILCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      887,747
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    157,231
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         185,493
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        45,600
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,276,071
<COMMON>                                       179,330
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            182,648
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 361,978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,000
<PREFERRED>                                     44,120
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           344,113
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              22,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  24,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   19,052
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      3,025
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   371
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 434,312
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,276,071
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      614,740
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            23,274
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     519,615
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     542,889
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         71,851
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  71,742
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        29,861
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,881
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,299
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   38,582
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        32,308
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       20,242
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          90,789
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.93
        

</TABLE>
Center for Veterinary Biologics

Assistant Director

Assistant Director

Supvy Microbiologist

Mark Pagala

Records & Information 

Management Specialist

Amanda Byersdorfer

Program Analyst

Crosley Herr

Anthony Lascio

11/19/2023

DB-4

Records Management 

Assistant

Julie Wolfe

Vacant

Quality Assurance Specialist

Vacant

Program Information

Management & Security

Section Leader

Supvy Microbiologist

Amber Peterson

Quality Management

Assistant

Tiana Blanco
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00245-CV

Larry CONN, Laura Conn, and L-C Concrete, Inc. d/b/a Texas Concrete Construction Company,

Appellants

v.

Paul BISHOP, Individually And Derivatively On Behalf Of Medina Valley Materials, LLC, 

Medina Valley Holdings, LLC, Medina Valley Land, LLC, Medina Valley Equipment, LLC, 

And Medina Valley Concrete Construction, LLC, And Jacob Bishop, Individually And 

Derivatively On Behalf Of Medina Valley Materials, LLC, Medina Valley Holdings, LLC, 

Medina Valley Land, LLC, and Medina Valley Equipment, LLC,

Appellees

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI02401

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ reply brief is due on September 19, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). 

Before the due date, Appellants filed an unopposed motion for a seven-day extension of time to 

file the reply brief. 

Appellants’ motion is granted; the reply brief is due on September 26, 2022. See id. R. 

38.6(d). 

It is so ORDERED September 22, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
#### Castro v. Administrative Director of Courts, State of Hawai'i

23232

05/22/2001

Granted

98 Hawai'i 5341 P.3d 715
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Policy, Evaluation, and Licensing Unit

Last Modified: 

Print

Policy, Evaluation, and Licensing (PEL) is a unit in the Center for Veterinary Biologics

(CVB). The licensing staff within CVB-PEL reviews license applications for production

facilities and biological products; reviews applications for permits for importation of

products; establishes licensing, testing, and permit requirements and procedures;

and reviews production methods, labels, and supporting data involved in the

licensing and permit process.

The laboratory staff within CVB-PEL conducts assays on veterinary biological

products. Primary activities include: 

1. prelicense testing,

2. test development and standardization (including reagent activities), and 

3. postlicense quality control monitoring.

Prelicense testing includes assaying parent materials (master seeds and cells) and

final product. Master seeds and master cell stocks are evaluated for purity and

identity (including identity of construct and expressed antigen for genetically

engineered products). Initial (usually three) serials (i.e., numbered batches) of

product are tested for purity, safety, and potency to assure that the product tests

are appropriate and transferable and that the manufacturer is able to make quality

product reproducibly.
Reference and reagent development, production, characterization, and distribution

are important standardization activities often best performed by a central

laboratory. Reference micro-organisms and standards, antisera, monoclonal

antibodies, fluorescent antibody conjugates, and other biological reagents are

provided to manufacturers for use in their in-vitro and in-vivo (e.g., vaccinationchallenge) testing. Standards may be used for direct or indirect potency

comparisons or for independent efficacy, identity, and purity testing.

Samples of each serial of all licensed veterinary biologics are submitted to the CVBPEL by the manufacturer and are stored for the shelf life of the product. All serials

are required to be tested by the manufacturer prior to sale. The reliability of the

manufacturer's quality control program is monitored by confirmatory testing of

randomly selected serials by the CVB-PEL. Marketed product also may be tested as

part of an investigation resulting from consumer or manufacturer concerns.

The CVB, as a regulatory entity, is not involved in fundamental research. It is

involved in applied research or developmental activities related to veterinary

biologics issues. The activities involve learning techniques needed to evaluate new

products (e.g., vectored immunogens), developing new tests and reagents (e.g., in

vitro antigen quantitation assays), and examining safety issues (e.g., virulence

markers). Special emphasis is placed on reducing or replacing animal use and

suffering in veterinary biologics evaluation.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (including registration of shares for resale by means of a Form S-3
prospectus) Nos. 33-95282 and 333-3438 pertaining to the 1993 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1995 Director Stock Purchase Plan and the 1989 Stock plan of
Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. of our report dated October 28, 1996 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Integrated
Silicon Solution, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended September 30, 1996.


                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose,  California
December 2, 1996