alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      31,052,000                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 5,646,000                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,384,000                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,617,000                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            97,176,000                       0
<PP&E>                                      59,462,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,803,000                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             268,534,000                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       46,477,000                       0
<BONDS>                                     20,143,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        12,000                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 136,955,000                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               268,534,000                       0
<SALES>                                     80,132,000             251,368,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            80,132,000             251,368,000
<CGS>                                       58,525,000             182,469,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,525,000             182,469,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,590,000              48,950,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             455,000               1,376,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,998,000              19,890,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,639,000               8,155,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,359,000              11,735,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,359,000              11,735,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20                    1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20                    0.99


</TABLE>
Outlawed!

Federal Noxious Weeds: The Aquatics

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 1688

Issued February 2001

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is responsible for preventing the

spread of certain foreign weeds into and through

the United States. Aquatic weeds pose a significant risk to the Nation’s surface water resources.

Free-floating and rooted aquatic weeds can clog

irrigation channels and cover lakes, threatening

crops and wildlife.

Although outlawed, some species on the Federal

Noxious Weeds List have been introduced intentionally through aquatic garden and aquarium

plant sales and distributed at swap meets.

Others have come here unintentionally as contaminants in legal shipments, in ballast water, etc.

For more information on the Federal Noxious

Weeds List, including more aquatics, visit

<www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/weeds/> on the 

World Wide Web.

Photo credits: The photograph of Monochoria vaginalis was taken by

C. Barre Hellquist of the biology department at the Massachusetts

College of Liberal Arts and is reproduced by permission. The photograph

of Caulerpa taxifolia was taken by Alexandre Meinesz, Laboratoire

Environnement Marin Littoral, Université de Nice–Sophia Antipolis, and is

reproduced by permission. The remaining images are from APHIS’ photo

library.

Giant salvinia

Salvinia auriculata complex

Anchored waterhyacinth

Eichhornia azurea

Hydrilla

Hydrilla verticillata

Indian hygrophila

Hygrophila polysperma

Oxygen weed

Lagarosiphon major

Limnophila

Limnophila sessiliflora

Monochoria

Monochoria vaginalis

Caulerpa

Caulerpa taxifolia

Pinnate mosquitofern

Azolla pinnata
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Importation of Plant Growth

Enhancers

Last Modified: 

Print

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) regulates the importation of

Plant Growth Enhancers (PGEs) under the authority of the Plant Protection Act. The

regulations in 7 CFR part 330 prohibit or restrict the importation or movement in

interstate commerce of any plant, plant product, biological control organism,

noxious weed, article (including baggage, mail, garbage, earth, stone or quarry

products) or means of conveyance if such actions are necessary to prevent the

introduction into or the dissemination within the United States of a plants pest or

noxious weed.  The regulations contained in "Subpart–Movement of Plant Pests, and

Movement of Soil, Stone, And Quarry Products" (§ 330.200) respectively, prohibit or

restrict the importation of such Plant Growth Enhancer products.

For more information, navigate through the Plant Growth Enhancers (PGEs) Website,

read the information contained, and submit your response to the questionnaire

before you are instructed to apply for a PPQ 526 permit.

Plant Growth Enhancers Website
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-92906) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan of Standard Management Corporation, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-41119) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of
Standard Management Corporation, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-41117) pertaining to the Standard Management Corporation Savings Plan, and
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-101359) pertaining to the 2002
Stock Incentive Plan of Standard Management Corporation of our report dated
March 2, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Standard Management Corporation and subsidiaries included in this
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 24, 2004
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

PCN Quarantine Information January

28, 2021

Last Modified: 

Print

The following changes have been made to the pale cyst nematode (PCN) regulated

area since the January 10, 2020 publication:

Approximately 240 acres of associated fields have been released from regulation

under the PCN Federal Rule (7 CFR §301.86). The locations of the fields, deregulated

after completing a release protocol comprised of a sequence of surveys with

negative laboratory results for PCN, and in accordance with 7 CFR §301.86, subpart

3(d)(2) Removal of fields from quarantine – Associated fields, are as follows:

Bonneville County, Idaho – T01N, R37E, section 8;

T01N R37E sections 18 and 19.

In accordance with the PCN Federal Rule, 7 CFR §301.86, subpart 3(c)(2), Criteria for

designation of fields as infested fields and associated fields - Associated fields, 444

acres were added to the regulated area due to their associations with an infested

field. The locations of the fields are as follows:

Bingham County, Idaho - T01N, R37E, sections 25 and 35;

T01N R37E, sections 2, 5, and 12;

T02S R36E, section 9.
With these changes, the current regulated area is 7,354 acres, of which 3,446 acres

are infested fields.

Regulated Field Map (574.47 KB)

Loading...
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Citrus Regulated Articles (Data

Table)

Last Modified: 

Print

For details on requirements for moving a regulated article, please consult the

regulated articles table below. The table is organized by regulated article so users

can find the requirements for moving fruit, nursery stock, or other regulated articles.

Loading...
CHAPTER 1.3.**DISEASES LISTED BY THE OIE**

The *diseases*in this chapter have been assessed in accordance with Chapter 1.2. and constitute the OIE list of *aquatic****animal****diseases*.

In case of modifications of this list of *aquatic animal****diseases*adopted by the World Assembly of Delegates, the new list comes into force on 1 January of the following year.

Article 1.3.1.

The following *diseases*of fish are listed by the OIE:

· Infection with *Aphanomyces invadans*(epizootic ulcerative syndrome)

· Infection with epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus

· Infection with *Gyrodactylus salaris*

· Infection with HPR-deleted or HPR0 infectious salmon anaemia virus

· Infection with infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus

· Infection with koi herpesvirus

· Infection with red sea bream iridovirus

· Infection with salmonid alphavirus

· Infection with spring viraemia of carp virus

· Infection with tilapia lake virus

· Infection with viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus.

[...]

___________________________
#### State v. Kaapuni

25888

02/11/2005

Affirmed in part & reversed in part
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarterly period ending September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,702
<SECURITIES>                                        11
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                       361
<INVENTORY>                                        250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,071
<PP&E>                                           3,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,613
<SALES>                                            806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   806
<CGS>                                              266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (5,833)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
_____________

No. 96-1939MN

No. 96-2449MN

_____________

St. Paul Fire and Marine *

Insurance Company; North Star *

Transport, Inc., a Minnesota *

corporation, *

*

Plaintiffs-Appellees, * Appeals from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Acceptance Insurance Company, * [UNPUBLISHED]

a Nebraska corporation; *

*

Defendant-Appellant, *

*

John Clear, *

*

Defendant. *

_____________

Submitted: February 14, 1997

 Filed: February 21, 1997

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Acceptance Insurance Company (Acceptance) appeals from adverse

decisions in this diversity-based insurance coverage dispute. Acceptance

contends the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant declaratory

relief. Acceptance also contends the district court improperly submitted

the fact-based coverage issue to a jury and erroneously ruled that

Acceptance's policy provided primary coverage. Finally, Acceptance attacks

the award of attorney's fees and expenses and the reasonableness of the

award. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we find no

error by the district court. We also conclude that an extended discussion
-2-

of the state law issues will serve no useful purpose. We affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 23, 2021

b0420 

# Order

Clerk April 23, 2021

161262

JODY POHLMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 161262

COA: 344121

Oakland CC: 2017

- 853588

- DO

JAMES G. POHLMAN,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On November 25, 2020, the Court ordered oral argument on the application for leave

to appeal the January 30, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of t he Court,

the application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In light of the appellee’s decision

not to contest the appellant’s application for leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the

Oakland Circuit Court and DIRECT that court to conduct an evide ntiary hearing within 56

days of the date of this order. The hearing shall focus on, and the circuit court shall make

factual findings as to, the appellant’s allegation that her signature on the parties’ January

31, 2018 settlement agreement was involunta ry because: (1) it was obtained under duress,

and (2) it was obtained without the mandatory domestic violence screening required by

MCL 600.1035(2) and (3) and MCR 3.216(H)(2). We further ORDER the circuit court to

submit a transcript of the hearing, tog ether with its findings, to the Clerk of this Court,

within 28 days of the conclusion of the hearing.

We retain jurisdiction.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 

AGENCY, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 17-91 (BAH)

Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendants Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. 

Department of Homeland Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 8, the plaintiffs 

National Public Radio, Inc. and Robert Benincasa’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF 

No. 9, the related legal memoranda in support and opposition to these motions, the exhibits and 

affidavits attached thereto, and the entire record herein, for the reasons set out in the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and 

it is further

ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

This is a final and appealable order.

Date: November 21, 2017

__________________________

BERYL A. HOWELL

Chief Judge
8 . 29 . 2017

Contact CVB Program and Information Management and Security 

(PIMS) at: CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov

We have an announcement!

An updated version of the NCAH Portal will be deployed on the evening of Tuesday, August 

29. The system will be unavailable from approximately 10pm –12am.

Most of the changes in this version are related to the parts of the NCAH Portal used by the 

National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL), BUT there is one change that may affect 

you... if you choose to take advantage of it.

Vol. 2 ISSUE 6

NCAH PORTAL news for CVB

Important Reminder

Items MUST be retrieved from the NCAH Portal and saved within 60 calendar days after 

completion of the Mail Log Item. The NCAH Portal is designed to be a transmission tool, not a 

retention tool. This is a security feature in place to protect your confidential business information. 

Updated User Guides 

1. User Guide #3 - Submission History (CVB) and Account Details

So what’s the big deal??

As well as updating the NCAH Portal, the Licensing, Serial Release and Testing Information System (LSRTIS) used 

internally by CVB will be updated. 

The updates will allow for TWO email addresses to be entered for each firm. ONE for Electronic Notification of 

Serial Release (ENSR) and the email notification of NCAH Portal activity, as well as, ONE for only the email 

notification of NCAH Portal activity.

Here’s an example of how this would work. Firm XYZ has decided to use this option and has submitted Address #1 as 

their ENSR email address and Address #2 as their NCAH Portal notification email address. Firm XYZ would 

receive the following email communications from CVB:

 11:00 am ENSRs would be sent to Address #1

 3:00 pm ENSRs would be sent to Address #1

 3:30 pm NCAH Portal status updates would be sent to Address #1 and Address #2

How to add an email address for NCAH Portal Notifications

If it is determined by a firm that they want to use this new option, the list below provides information and steps for getting 

set up.

1. Only liaisons or alternate liaisons can submit an email address to be used for the NCAH Portal emails.

2. An email must be sent to CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov with the subject line, “ACTION REQUESTED: Email address 

for NCAH Portal notification emails” by a liaison or alternate liaison.

3. It is strongly suggested that these email addresses be shared accounts to avoid a single point failure should one 

person be unavailable. These emails contain status updates for all submissions and CVB-initiated correspondence; 

such as inspection reports and annual administrative inspection reviews (AIRs), transmitted through the NCAH 

Portal. 

Your feedback is important!

This was a request that we were hearing quite often, from quite a few users, so we decided 

to implement the change.
# C_2018392EN.01000801.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 August 2018 — RD v SC

(Case C-518/18)

(2018/C 392/12)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RD

Defendant: SC

Question referred

Must Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims be interpreted as meaning that a claim which has been decided on after taking evidence may be regarded as uncontested if neither the defendant, who acknowledged the debt before the commencement of the action, nor the guardian took part in the court proceedings, and they did not raise any objections in the course of the proceedings?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15.

---
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Note Regarding Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.**

After reasonable efforts, we have been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen’s consent to the incorporation by reference of their report for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and December 31, 2001 into our previouslyfiled registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, and we have not filed that consent with this Annual report on Form 10-K in reliance upon Rule 437a under the Securities Act. Because we have not been able to obtain ArthurAndersen’s consent, you may not be able to recover against Arthur Andersen under Section 11 of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in our financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omission tostate a material fact required to be stated therein.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00787-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.R.M., a Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-01812

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s November 3, 2022 

order of termination is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant 

in relation to this appeal because she is presumed indigent under Texas Family Code section 

107.013(e).

SIGNED March 15, 2023.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
June 5, 2002

23924

#### State v. Hearn

Affirmed