alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lauer, Exrx., Appellee, *v.*Wingerd, Exr., Appellant.

(No. 31753

Decided May 11, 1949.)

*Mr. Donald W. Seiple,*for appellee.

*Mr. Christian R. Wingerd,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman,. Stewart, Turner and Taft, JJ., concur.
Danh sách kiểm tra thức ăn gia 

cầm và thay chất độn chuồng

Thức ăn và chất độn chuồng sạch là hai loại hàng bạn luôn cần dự trữ sẵn trong nguồn cung 

dồi dào tại cơ sở chăn nuôi gia cầm của bạn. Chúng cũng có thể thu hút sự chú ý của thú 

hoang, các loài gặm nhấm và côn trùng. Điều quan trọng là cần tiếp nhận, lưu trữ và xử lý các 

mặt hàng này một cách cẩn thận để giảm thiểu nguy cơ nhiễm bệnh. Bằng cách thực hiện một 

vài bước đơn giản, bạn có thể đảm bảo rằng thức ăn và chất độn chuồng gia cầm của bạn 

được an toàn - và không mang mầm bệnh có thể làm cho gia cầm bị bệnh.

Hãy xem danh mục ở mặt sau để biết những 

lời khuyên giúp giữ cho đàn gia cầm của bạn 

khỏe mạnh.

√

Nếu bạn phát hiện những dấu hiệu gia cầm bị ốm, hãy hành động ngay! Số Điện Thoại

Bác sĩ thú y

Văn Phòng Khuyến Nông Hợp Tác Xã

Phòng Thí Nghiệm Chẩn Đoán Thú Y/Gia Súc hoặc Gia Cầm của Tiểu Bang

USDA 866.536.7593

Cơ Quan Thanh Tra Sức Khỏe Động Vật và Thực Vật

Báo Cáo Gia Cầm Bị Ốm
Danh mục: Kiểm tra thức ăn gia 

cầm và thay chất độn chuồng

USDA là một cơ quan tạo cơ hội, tuyển dụng và cho vay 

bình đẳng với tất cả mọi người.

Cơ Quan Thanh Tra Sức Khỏe Động Vật và Thực Vật

Chương Trình Hỗ Trợ Số 2235-14VI | Phát hành tháng Hai năm 2020

Danh mục này là một hướng dẫn chung để áp dụng tốt an toàn sinh học, nhưng nếu bạn có một 

kế hoạch an toàn sinh học cụ thể cho từng khu vực, hãy tuân thủ kế hoạch đó. Những người 

chăn nuôi thương mại phải đảm bảo kế hoạch cho khu vực cụ thể của mình tuân thủ các quy 

tắc an toàn sinh học của Kế Hoạch Nâng Cao Đàn Gia Cầm Quốc Gia.

√

Đảm bảo các xe giao hàng được che chắn để 

tránh làm ô nhiễm thức ăn, nguyên liệu thức ăn và 

chất độn chuồng mới trong quá trình vận chuyển 

đến trang trại.

Lưu trữ thức ăn, nguyên liệu thức ăn và chất độn 

chuồng mới trong thùng hoặc tòa nhà kín để 

tránh nhiễm mầm bệnh.

Cẩn thận khi chuyển thức ăn dự trữ, nguyên 

liệu thức ăn và chất độn chuồng mới vào 

chuồng gia cầm. Chỉ sử dụng thiết bị đã được 

làm sạch và khử trùng, hoặc tốt hơn là thiết bị chỉ 

dành riêng để xử lý thức ăn và chất độn chuồng 

sạch.

Dọn dẹp sạch sẽ thức ăn bị đổ ra ngoài càng 

sớm càng tốt để khỏi thu hút thú hoang và các 

loài gặm nhấm.

Để biết thêm thông tin về cách giữ cho đàn gia cầm của bạn khỏe mạnh, hãy theo dõi 

Defend the Flock trên Facebook và Twitter và truy cập

www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/defendtheflock.

Để các bao thức ăn phía trên sàn nhà và có biện pháp 

kiểm soát các loài gặm nhấm.

Hàng ngày kiểm tra xem thức ăn có bị đổ ra ngoài 

không. Tìm những nơi thức ăn bị đổ ra ngoài và sửa 

chữa.

Ghi lại công việc đó. Đưa vào kế hoạch an toàn sinh học 

của bạn các biện pháp áp dụng tại khu chăn nuôi của bạn 

để bảo vệ thức ăn gia cầm và chất độn chuồng khỏi bị 

nhiễm bệnh từ chim hoang dã, các loài gặm nhấm, côn 

trùng và các động vật khác. Đó có thể là các văn bản, nhật 

ký theo dõi và hướng dẫn đối với các nhà thầu.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00922-CR

Michele Valdez VALDEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR0909

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED January 16, 2019.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
REGIONAL

BUSINESS CENTERS

USDA Regional Food Business Centers Geographic Regions 

Alaska 

Hawaii 

Guam 

Commonwealth of 

the Mariana Islands 

American 

Samoa Puerto Rico 

and US Virgin Islands 

National Intertribal Food Business Center - Intertribal Agriculture Council will serve tribes nationwide.

Northwest and Rocky Mountain 

Colorado State University 

Southwest 

University of California 

(This Center will serve the Colonias counties in California and Arizona.) 

North Central 

Region Five Development Commission 

Heartland 

University of Nebraska - Lincoln 

Rio Grande Colonias 

Texas A&M AgriLife 

(This Center will serve the Colonias counties in New Mexico and Texas.) 

Great Lakes Midwest 

Michigan State University Center for Regional Food Systems 

Delta 

Mississippi Delta Council for Farmworker Opportunities 

Appalachia 

Rural Action, Inc. 

Northeast 

National Association of State Departments of Agriculture Foundation 

Southeast 

Georgia Minority Outreach Network 

Islands and Remote Areas 

Hawaii Good Food Alliance 

*These boundaries are not rigid but for visualization purposes only. USDA anticipates collaboration with communities across state and county lines.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:            |  |                            
|---------------- |  | ---------------------------
|January 23, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                 |  |                            
|                 |  | John P. Manning            
|                 |  | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
17976

#### Honda v. IBEW Local Union 1357

December 6, 1996

Order No. 96-36

Affirmed
#### 821 Carroll St. Co., Respondent, *v.*Dave Moiski, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 24, 1959.

*Harry Karsh*for appellant.

*Sydney Rothstein*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The discontinuance of tenant’s services as a part-time janitor did not affect his rights as a statutory tenant of the subject controlled apartment *(Filmat Realty Corp.*v. *Carleo,*186 Misc. 717; Opinion of State Rent Administrator No. 42; State Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 16; cf. *Matter of Friedman*v. *Weaver,*3 N Y 2d 123).

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to the tenant and petition dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — Pette, Di Gtovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.
#### State v. Barnhard

17429

12/9/96

Affirmed
September 19, 2000

23063

#### State v. Camara

Affirmed
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gary L. HARDING, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 15369.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 3, 1978.

Allen K. Young, of Stott, Young & Wilson, Provo, for defendant and appellant.

Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, Noall T. Wootton, Utah County Atty., Provo, for plaintiff and respondent.

HALL, Justice:

Defendant’s appeal challenges the severity of the punishment provided for aggravated burglary on constitutional grounds asserting that it is disproportionate to the offense and a denial of equal protection and due process. He lacks the requisite standing to raise those issues and the appeal is dismissed.

Defendant was charged with the first degree felony offense of aggravated burglary 1 and convicted thereof after a bench trial in the District Court of Utah County. That offense is punishable by five years to life in prison,2 however, at the time of sentencing defendant moved the court, pursuant to statute,3 to enter judgment of conviction for the next lower category of offense and to impose sentence accordingly. The court granted the motion, entered its judgment of conviction of *attempted*aggravated burglary, a felony of the second degree, and imposed the statutory penalty4 of one to fifteen years in prison.

Defendant takes no exception to the sentence imposed for his conviction of attempted aggravated burglary but, rather, attacks the constitutionality of the punishment provided for an offense that was not imposed upon him. This he cannot do. He *1285may only assert his own constitutional rights and not those of others.5

ELLETT, C. J., and CROCKETT, MAU-GHAN and WILKINS, JJ., concur.

1

. In violation of U.C.A.1953, 76-6-203(l)(c).

2

. U.C.A.1953, 76-3-203(1).

3

. U.C.A.1953, 76-3^102(1) allows discretion in sentencing where nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and character of the defendant warrants it.

4

.U.C.A.1953, 76-3-203(2) and 76-4-102(2).

5

. *Greaves*v. *State,*Utah, 528 P.2d 805 (1974); *McGowan v. Maryland,*366 U.S. 420, 81 S.Ct. 1101, 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961).
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16922]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2016-4282; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-3]

Proposed Establishment of Temporary Restricted Areas R-2509E, R-
2509W, and R-2509N; Twentynine Palms, CA; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register of March 30, 2016, proposing to establish temporary restricted 
areas R-2509E, R-2509W, and R-2509N, Twentynine Palms, CA. The FAA has 
determined that withdrawal of that NPRM is warranted due to 
aeronautical impacts associated with the proposed action.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 19, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy Group, 
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington DC, 20591; telephone (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    An NPRM was published in the Federal Register of March 30, 2016 (81 
FR 17619), to establish new temporary restricted areas R-2509E, R-
2509W, and R-2509N to accommodate a United States Marine Corps (USMC) 
Large Scale Exercise (LSE) on new Twentynine Palms lands planned for 
August 1 to August 18, 2016. The proposed new temporary restricted 
areas would support live fire activities including anti-tank weapons, 
mortars, and artillery, as well as Unmanned Aircraft Systems, fixed 
wing, and rotary wing training activities conducting close air support 
and live ordnance delivery. Efforts to mitigate the aeronautical 
impacts associated with the proposed action have been unsuccessful and 
there is no longer sufficient time remaining to complete the actions 
required to process the airspace proposal in time for the August 1, 
2016, exercise start date. Therefore, the NPRM is being withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73

    Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas.

The Withdrawal

    In consideration of the foregoing, the NPRM for FR Doc. FAA-2016-
4282, Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-3, as published in the Federal 
Register of March 30, 2016 (81 FR 17619) (FR Doc. 2016-07166), is 
hereby withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 12, 2016.
Leslie M. Swann,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2016-16922 Filed 7-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
21274

#### State v. Kanakanui

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31,
2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      44,878,968
<SECURITIES>                                22,652,849
<RECEIVABLES>                                  673,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,281,036
<PP&E>                                         634,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,695,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,655,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       93,228,687
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (37,187,819)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,695,171
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,744
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  789,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               834,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,241,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,241,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,241,225)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00016-CR

RANDALL CULPEPPER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 220th District Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-14202

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Randall Culpepper was convicted on November 19, 2012. He attempted to 

appeal his conviction by presenting a Motion for Extension of Time to File a Notice of 

Appeal and a Notice of Appeal which were filed in this Court on January 16, 2013. By 

letter dated January 22, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Culpepper that the appeal 

was subject to dismissal because Culpepper’s motion for extension of time to file the 

notice of appeal was untimely. TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3; 26.3. By the same letter, the Clerk 

warned Culpepper that, unless any party filed a response showing why we should not 
Culpepper v. State Page 2

dismiss the appeal within 14 days of the letter, the appeal would be dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. Culpepper filed a response stating that he intended to perfect an appeal 

and that a dismissal would frustrate the interest of justice.

We may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the 

deadline for filing the notice of appeal, a party files a notice of appeal in the trial court 

and files a motion with the appellate court complying with Rule 10.5(b). TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3. Because the Court had been informed that no motion for new trial was filed, the 

deadline to file Culpepper’s notice of appeal with the trial court was December 19, 2012. 

Id. 26.2. Thus, the motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due to be 

filed with this Court by January 3, 2013. Id. 26.3. It was not filed until January 16, 2013. 

Further, to take advantage of a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, 

the notice of appeal was also to be filed with the trial court by January 3, 2013. Id. A 

notice of appeal was not filed with the trial court by that date.

This Court has no jurisdiction over an appeal where the notice of appeal is 

untimely. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If an appeal is not 

timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of 

the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 

S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Culpepper’s motion for extension of time to 

file an appeal is dismissed as moot.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Culpepper v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 14, 2013

Do not publish 

[CR25]
UNCONTROLLED COPY

ICSOP0032.04

Page 1 of 4

United States Department of Agriculture

Center for Veterinary Biologics

Standard Operating Policy/Procedure

Processing United States Veterinary Permits for Importation and 

Transportation of Controlled Materials and Organisms and Vectors 

(VS Form 16-6A MAR 95)

Date: March 22, 2018

Number: ICSOP0032.04

Supersedes: ICSOP0032.03, June 3, 2013

Contact: Becky Rasmussen, (515) 337-6138

Approvals:

/s/Steven A. Karli Date: 23Mar18

Steven A. Karli, Director

Inspection and Compliance

Center for Veterinary Biologics

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

P. O. Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

INTERNAL USE ONLY

Mention of trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by USDA 

and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.

Entered into CVB Quality Management System

by: /s/Linda S. Snavely 27Mar18 

 Linda S. Snavely Date

 Quality Management Program Assistant
Center for Veterinary Biologics ICSOP0032.04

Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Page 2 of 4

Processing United States Veterinary Permits for Importation and Transportation of Controlled 

Materials and Organisms and Vectors (VS Form 16-6A MAR 95)

UNCONTROLLED COPY

Table of Contents

1. Purpose

2. Procedures

3. Summary of Revisions

Center for Veterinary Biologics ICSOP0032.04

Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Page 4 of 4 

Processing United States Veterinary Permits for Importation and Transportation of Controlled 

Materials and Organisms and Vectors (VS Form 16-6A MAR 95) 

UNCONTROLLED COPY 

2.3 The IC Investigation Manager: 

 Receives import permit for unlicensed establishments from the IC-Lead BCA.

Reviews the import permit by conducting an internet search and reviewing the

site for compliance with Virus-Serum-Toxin Act laws and title 9, Code of

Federal Regulations, regulations.

 Subsequent actions may be taken based on the IC Investigation Manager’s

review.

3. Summary of Revisions

Version .04 

 The Contact has been changed from Linda Snavely to Becky Rasmussen.

 IC-BOA was changed to IC-Lead BCA throughout the document.

Version .03

 2.1: This section has been revised to reflect current procedures of processing import

permits by the IC-BOA.

 2.3: This section has been revised to reflect current procedures of reviewing import

permits by the IC Investigation Manager.

Version .02

 The Contact has been changed from Renee Schnurr to Linda Snavely.

 1: This section has been updated to reflect more current information on submission

of import permits by NCIE and retention of documents.

 2.1: This section has been updated to reflect more current procedures of processing

import permits by the IC-OAA.

 2.2: This section has been updated to reflect more current responsibilities of the

Biologics Specialist in reviewing import permits.

 2.3: This section has been changed to include the IC-BCI’s responsibilities in

reviewing import permits.
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART TWO

ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES

ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Article 11

Article 134(2), first subparagraph, of the EAEC Treaty on the composition of the Scientific and Technical Committee shall be replaced by the following:

‘2.   The Committee shall consist of forty-two members, appointed by the Council after consultation with the Commission.’.

---
U.S. Department East Building, PHH

– 32

of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast

Washington, D.C. 20590

Pipeline and Hazardous The US Department of Transportation

Materials Safety Administration Competent Authority for the United States

CLASSI FICATION OF EXPLOSIVES

Tracking No: 2010031008 Page 1 of 1 EXPIRATION DATE : 06

- 30

- 2015

Based upon a request by N2 Towers, Inc.

, 10 Forin St.

, Belleville, Ontario

, K8H 2H6

, the following items are classed in accordance with Section 173.56, Title 49, Code of

Federal Regulations (49 CFR). A copy of your application, all sup porting documentation

and a copy of this approval must be retained and made available to DOT upon request.

U.N. PROPER SHIPPING NAME AND NUMBER :

Flammable solid, inorganic, n.o.s.

, UN3178

U.N. CLASSIFICATION CODE : 4.1

REFERENCE NUMBER PRODUCT DESIGNATI ON/PART NUMBER

EX2010030506 N2 Fire Suppression System, D/N SK

- 3

NOTES : The following packaging method is assigned: Inner Packaging

- Sufficient

cushioning dunnage in the outer packaging to prevent movement during transport. Outer

Packaging

- UN 4D ply wood box, each containing one article.

DATED : 07/16/2010

For Dr. Magdy El

- Sibaie

Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 3

SECTION 3

THE COUNCIL

Article 239

(ex Article 206 TEC)

(ex Article 206 TEC)

Where a vote is taken, any Member of the Council may also act on behalf of not more than one other member.

---