alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Item_5_3_12a_Q fever/ page 1

Annex 27

CHAPTER 8.X.INFECTION WITH *COXIELLA**BURNETII* (Q FEVER)

Article 8.X.1.

General provisions

Various animal species and humans can be affected by Q fever, but many of them, including *wild* and *feral* animals, do not play an epidemiologically significant role. For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, Q fever is defined as an *infection* of domestic and *captive wild* ruminants, dogs, and cats (hereafter ‘susceptible animal’) with *Coxiella burnetii*. 

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with *C. burnetii*:

1)	*C. burnetii* has been isolated and identified as such in a sample from a susceptible animal; or 

2)	nucleic acid specific to *C. burnetii* has been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with *C.**burnetii*, or~~that is~~epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*; or

3)	antibodies specific to *C. burnetii*, that are not the consequence of *vaccination*, have been detected in a sample from a susceptible animal showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with *C.**burnetii*, or~~that is~~epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*.

Standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*. 

___________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023	1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0006. MIKE REDFORD v. TARMARSHE SMITH, WARDEN.

Mike Redford has filed in this Court an application for discretionary appeal of

the trial court’s order granting the respondent’s motion to quash subpoena in

Redford’s proceeding for habeas corpus relief. Under our Constitution, the Supreme

Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all habeas corpus cases. See Ga.

Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4). This application is therefore

TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 28, 2020

07/28/2020
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 24 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-74, CP2024-76.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-26831 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 10.1


Aware, Inc. 2018 Executive Bonus Plan


 


Aware,
Inc. (the “Company”) executives, Kevin Russell and David Martin (the “Participants”) will be eligible
to receive bonuses as described below based upon the achievement by the Company of a profit before taxes (“PBT”) target
(the “2018 Plan PBT Goal”) determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.


 


The
amount of the bonus earned by a Participant will depend upon the Company’s actual 2018 PBT, as compared to the 2018 Plan
PBT goal. The following tables will be used to determine the applicable bonuses:


 


Kevin
Russell


	Actual PBT as a % of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	
        Bonus Amount

	Less than 100% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$0
	100% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$25,000
	125% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$50,000
	150% or more of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$100,000


 


David
Martin


	Actual PBT as a % of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	
        Bonus Amount

	Less than 100% of  2018 Plan PBT Goal	$0
	100% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$15,000
	125% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$35,000
	150% or more of 2018 Plan PBT Goal	$70,000


 


The
amount of bonus payable will be subject to linear interpolation to reflect actual 2018 PBT between the 2018 Plan PBT Goal and
125% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal or between 125% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal and 150% of 2018 Plan PBT Goal.


 


Bonus
payouts, to the extent earned, will be paid approximately 45 days following the end of the 2018 fiscal year. All bonus payouts
are subject to statutory deductions and are taxable at the time of payment. In the event that Mr. Russell’s or Mr. Martin’s
employment by the Company terminates during the fiscal year by reason of retirement, total and permanent disability, or death,
the terminated person will receive a pro-rated bonus. If Mr. Russell’s or Mr. Martin’s employment by the Company is
terminated by the Company without cause, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, award the terminated person a pro-rata
bonus. In the event that Mr. Russell’s or Mr. Martin’s employment terminates for any other reason, including resignation
and discharge for cause prior to the bonus payout date, all rights to a bonus will be forfeited. All payouts
from this bonus plan are subject to final approval by the Compensation Committee, which shall have the authority to reduce, but
not increase, any amounts payable under the Plan.


 


The
adoption and maintenance of the 2018 Executive Bonus Plan shall not be deemed a contract of employment. Nothing herein contained
shall be deemed to give Mr. Russell or Mr. Martin the right to be retained in the employ of the Company or to interfere with the
right of the Company to discharge Mr. Russell or Mr. Martin at any time, nor shall it interfere with Mr. Russell or Mr. Martin’s
right to terminate their employment at any time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 30, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 125 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-87, CP2024-89.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26823 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
December 21, 2004

26021

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3018

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Ronald M. Thomas, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 2000 Filed: March 27, 2000

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ronald Thomas challenges the district court’s 1 judgment, entered on a jury verdict, finding him guilty of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). For reversal, he argues the government presented insufficient

evidence to convict him. However, viewing the evidence in the light most favora ble to the jury’s verdict and giving the verdict the benefit of all reasonable-2-

inferences, see United States v. Buford , 108 F.3d 151, 153 (8th Cir. 1997), we conclude ample evidence of Thomas’s guilt was adduced at trial, see United States v. Perkins , 94 F.3d 429, 436 (8th Cir. 1996) (elements of § 841(a)(1) offense), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 1136 (1997). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
980 P.2d 998

#### Tseu v. Jeyte

20489

8/26/98

Denied

88 Hawai'i 85, 962 P.2d 344
August 30, 2004

24729

#### Hamilton v. Lerud

Affirmed
90 P.3d 276

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Schiller v. Schiller

25258

05/04/2004

Affirmed, vacated & remanded
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11332

Summary Calendar

 

MARY ROBLEDO, on behalf of

Chrystal Prieto,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-224

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1998

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mary Robledo, on behalf of Chrystal Prieto, appeals the

district court’s judgment affirming the denial of Supplemental

Security Income benefits. We affirm for substantially the

reasons stated and adopted by the district court. Robledo v.

Apfel, No. 2:96-CV-224 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 1997). 

 AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register: June 28, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 124)]
[Notices]               
[Page 37780]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn11-51]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Vermont Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Vermont State Advisory Committee will convene at 10:30 a.m. on 
Tuesday, July 12, 2011, at the University of Vermont, Bishop Joyce 
Conference Room, 411 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05405. The purpose of 
the planning meeting is to plan the committee's future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by Friday, August 12, 
2011. The address is Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th Street, NW., 
Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or who desire additional information should contact the 
Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: ero@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC on June 23, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-16108 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
United States Department of Agriculture 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

WS Directive 4.410 03/25/04

RECOGNITION OF PUBLICATIONS

1. PURPOSE 

To encourage the development and exchange of information by WS 

personnel and to appropriately recognize contributions to the 

wildlife management profession. 

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS 

This directive revises WS Directive 4.410 dated 8/14/97. 

3. POLICY 

All WS operations personnel are eligible to receive awards for 

publications or published abstracts for presentation of papers

they authored or co-authored. In addition, methods development 

personnel who co-author presentations or publications with 

operations personnel are eligible to receive awards. WS will 

recognize a maximum of three technical or non-technical papers 

presented by WS employees at national, regional, or State 

wildlife management meetings or workshops and/or published in 

conference proceedings or scientific and technical journals. 

In the spring, the Director of Operational Support Staff, may 

request that Directors and State Directors submit papers that 

were published or presented for publication by WS employees 

during the previous calendar year or other appropriate period of 

time as denoted in the call for papers. 

4. REVIEW PROCESS 

The WS Deputy Administrator will appoint a panel of three to five 

members to assess the merits of each eligible paper based on the 

following criteria: 

a. Degree subject matter is related to the WS program, 

b. Degree WS operational personnel contributed to the 

publication, 

c. Where presented or published (national, State, etc.), 

d. Quality of publication: 

1. Sound analysis and logic 

2. Publication within a referred journal, 

3. Quality of writing, 

e. Level of contribution to the wildlife management profession. 

5. AWARD 
A maximum of three papers will be selected by the panel for 

recognition, and the WS author(s) will receive a cash award based on 

the panel's recommendation. The WS Deputy Administrator will 

determine the amount of the award and the occasion on which it will be 

presented. 

Deputy Administrator
##### 



Exhibit 9.91

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Voice & Wireless Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mark Haggerty, Chief Executive Officer and Keith Witter, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/  Mark Haggerty
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
| | /s/  Keith Witter
Chief Financial Officer
#### Finley v. Home Ins. Co.

20830

9/30/98

Granted
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. McManus, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 Dated: February 10, 2005
 ****By:
/s/ Michael A. McManus, Jr.Michael A. McManus, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained by MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      19,396,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              374,548,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,000,000
<INVENTORY>                                383,282,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           775,226,000
<PP&E>                                      29,538,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,303,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             785,461,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      453,495,000
<BONDS>                                    275,470,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     47,000
<COMMON>                                         6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,443,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               785,461,000
<SALES>                                     71,862,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,862,000
<CGS>                                       21,420,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,420,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           116,910,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          39,444,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (105,912,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,458,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (108,370,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (18.38)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18.38)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS reflect 1 for 5 reverse stock split (effective April 2000)
</FN>


</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NAHLN Information Technology

System

Last Modified: 

Print

A critical aspect of the National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) is the

effort to standardize data, improve data quality, and increase the speed of reporting

laboratory results through electronic data transfer from laboratories across the

network.

Standardized data are routed from each Laboratory’s Information Messaging System

(LIMS) to Veterinary Services, then the results are directed through the Laboratory

Messaging Services (LMS) to integrate into the appropriate database for analysis and

reporting purposes. 

The NAHLN uses an HL7 message structure and SNOMED (www.ihtsdo.org) and

LOINC(www.loinc.org) data standards for messaging test results.

Veterinary Terminology Services at Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary

Medicine provides a NAHLN Terminology Service

(http://vtsl.vetmed.vt.edu/nahln/main.cfm) website to support NAHLN training

efforts. The website serves as a resource for NAHLN laboratories to reference

specific information on laboratory reporting, messaging implementation, up-to-date

message schemas, method object identifiers (OIDs), LOINC and SNOMED codes, and

more. It also includes a private discussion forum for terminology issues for NAHLN
laboratories.

Quick Guide to Messaging

An overview of the process and the necessary steps to start messaging are provided

in the Quick User Guide to HL7 Messaging (69.59 KB).

Questions?

For queries regarding NAHLN messaging, please email the NAHLN IT support group.
#### The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. George MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14025.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 1, 1976.

George Martinez, pro se.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., William W. Barrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

ELLETT, Justice:

In this matter counsel for defendant filed a brief on appeal and then pursuant to the suggestion made by the United States Supreme Court in the case of *Anders v.*California1 requested permission to withdraw.

The appellant was convicted by a jury in the court below of the crime , of attempted aggravated robbery and thereafter was sentenced to prison.

On the morning of trial the defendant moved to exclude identification evidence, which motion was denied on the ground that the motion was not timely filed.

The identification evidence was positive. The victim identified him the same night the crime was committed. Another witness who worked in the market where the crime was committed positively identified the appellant as the one who perpetrated the offense, and also identified the gun, taken from the appellant when arrested, as being the same one used in the crime.

An independent witness who was in the market saw the crime and also identified the appellant as being the man involved in the crime. A buddy of the appellant testified that he was with him in the market at the time of the alleged crime, but denied that there was any attempted robbery.

The thrust of the argument of appellant is that the witnesses should not have been permitted to testify because shortly after the crime the defendant was arrested and the three eye witnesses were taken to the point of arrest where each positively identified him. He claims that their testimony was tainted.

There is no merit to the claim.2 The evidence was properly received by the court and the verdict of guilty was based upon competent and sufficient evidence.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

HENRIOD, C. J., and CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.

1

. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

2

. *State v. Allen,*29 Utah 2d 442, 511 P.2d 159 (1973).