alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 26707 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 89 / Monday, May 9, 2011 / Notices
Dated: May 3, 2011. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2011–11181 Filed 5–6–11; 8:45 am] **BILLING CODE 3510–22–P**

**COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR**  **SEVERELY DISABLED Appointments to Performance Review**  **Board for Senior Executive Service**
**AGENCY :**  Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled. **ACTION :**  Appointment of Performance Review Board for Senior Executive Service.

**SUMMARY :**  The Committee For Purchase from People Who Are Blind Or Severely Disabled (Committee) has announced the following appointments to the Committee Performance Review Board.

The following individuals are appointed as members of the Committee Performance Review Board responsible for making recommendations to the appointing and awarding authorities on performance appraisal ratings and performance awards for Senior Executive Service employees: Perry E. Anthony, PhD, Deputy

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration, Department of Education. James H. Omvig, Sr., Private Citizen. J. Anthony Poleo, Principal Deputy

Comptroller, Defense Logistics Agency. All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of Title 5 of the United States Code.
**DATES :**  Effective Date: May 10, 2010.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Patricia Briscoe, Telephone: (703) 603– 7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or e-mail CMTEFedReg@abilityone.gov. Patricia Briscoe, Deputy Director, Business Operations (Pricing and Information Management). [FR Doc. 2011–11221 Filed 5–6–11; 8:45 am]
**BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**  **Office of the Secretary [Transmittal Nos. 11–10]**  **36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification**
**AGENCY :**  Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense. **ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  John Unglesbee, DSCA/DBO/CFM; Phone 703–601–6026. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10–25 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: May 3, 2011. Morgan F. Park, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**
#### State v. Hassard.

17118

12/26/96

Vacated and Remanded
February 7, 2006

26760

#### State v. Santarone

Affirmed
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00359-CR

__________________

EX PARTE JOSEPH COLONE

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-10213

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph Colone appealed from an order denying his application for a writ of 

habeas corpus. On December 19, 2023, Colone filed a motion to dismiss the appeal 

as moot because he has pleaded guilty and the case upon which he had been seeking 

bail is now disposed and a final sentence has been imposed in this case. The State 

agrees that the appeal is moot and should be dismissed. Issues regarding pretrial bail 

are moot when the accused is no longer subject to pretrial confinement. See Martinez 

v. State, 826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Bennet v. State, 818 S.W.2d 

199, 200 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss 

the appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 16, 2024

Opinion Delivered January 17, 2024

Do Not Publish

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1



    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insurance Auto
Auctions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas C. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  November 9, 2005

                                      /s/ Thomas C. O'Brien
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Thomas C. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer



         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARONEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.AND
SUBSIDIARIES SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,788,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,602,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,487,000
<PP&E>                                       5,102,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,839,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,045,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,423,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,594,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,045,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,002,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,231,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,231,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,231,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)
        

</TABLE>
#### WYDISCO, INC., f/d/b/a Wyoming Discount Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Martin McMAHON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 4288.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Feb. 27, 1974.

William D. Bagley, Cheyenne, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harold M. Johnson, Rawlins, for defendant-appellee.

Before McEWAN, GUTHRIE, Mc-INTYRE and McCLINTOCK, JJ.

ORDER

The defendant-appellee filed herein on February 15, 1974 a motion to dismiss the plaintiff-appellant’s appeal upon the ground and for the reasons that the record filed herein does not contain a transcript or statement of the evidence as contemplated by rule 75(b) and (c), and on February 25, 1974 the appellant filed its response to the^ said motion. The appellant’s brief states: “The issue presented to this Court is whether parol evidence can be used to vary the terms of a written instrument.” The court having examined the record and considered the briefs and motion and response finds that it cannot determine the issues sought to be raised by the appellant in this appeal because the trial of the matter in the district court was not reported and no transcript was made, and neither was there a statement of the evidence or proceedings filed. Therefore, this court determines that defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal should be and it is hereby granted and the plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARKER, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision in the matter.
Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0802 Directorate Identifier: 2012 - NM - 124 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION PERSON C ONTACTED DATE RESPONSE National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 7/28/2011 --- Regional Airline Association 7/28/2011 --- Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 7/28/2011 --- ATA Jo e White 7/28/2011 ---

Other/Additional Information:
USDA APHIS

2150 Centre Ave

Fort Collins, Co 80526

Data Source:

APHIS-PPQ Karnal Bunt program

These data, and all the information contained therein, have been collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and

Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), or by its cooperators on APHIS’ behalf, for restricted government purposes only and is

the sole property of APHIS. See full disclaimer: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/help/data-disclaimer

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

2020 Annual APHIS-PPQ Cooperative National Survey for Karnal Bunt

0 190 380

Miles

0 190 380

Kilometers

Date Created:

2/9/2023

[

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

* AK, HI, and PR (not shown) do not participate in the annual national survey.

The annual cooperative

Karnal Bunt Survey, initiated

in 1996, samples representative host material

in significant areas of production. The goal of

the survey is to ensure continued freedom from

Karnal bunt (Tilletia indica) in the U.S. marketplace.

Counties shown in green participated in the survey and

met the official sampling requirements, without detection

of Karnal bunt.

Arizona 3

Arkansas 4

California 3

Colorado 7

Delaware 3

Idaho 17

Illinois 26

Indiana 31

Kansas 26

Louisiana 3

Minnesota 16

Montana 22

Nebraska 24

Nevada 1

New Jersey 4

New York 10

North Carolina 13

North Dakota 24

Ohio 9

Oklahoma 10

Oregon 1

South Dakota 17

Texas 7

Utah 6

Virginia 1

Washington 7

Wyoming 2

State Participating Counties

Counties that participated in the survey and

met the official sampling requirements
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.8





June 12, 2018


Ynon Kreiz 


VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY




Dear Ynon, 


This letter confirms our discussions regarding the allocation of your 2018 long-term incentive (“LTI”) grant value, which is comprised of equity-based awards in the form of Performance Units, granted under the 2018-2020 Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”), and annual equity grants of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”).  As discussed, notwithstanding anything contained in your offer letter with Mattel, dated April 19, 2018, your 2018 LTI grant value will be allocated 50% in Performance Units and the remaining 50% will be allocated between stock options and RSUs as determined by the Compensation Committee.  The allocation of your LTI grant value in subsequent years will be determined by the Compensation Committee.


This letter further confirms your acknowledgement that neither the foregoing nor any action taken by Mattel in connection therewith will constitute a breach of, or “Good Reason” for purposes of, your offer letter or any other agreement between you and Mattel, or any Mattel plan or other arrangement, and you hereby consent to the foregoing.  




Sincerely,


/s/ Michael J. Dolan




Michael J. Dolan
Chair, Compensation Committee






Acknowledged, Agreed, and Consented To,
this 12th day of June, 2018:




/s/ Ynon Kreiz
__________________________________
Ynon Kreiz
November 5, 2004

23890

#### Guia v. Arakaki

Affirmed
#### Lester v. Rapp

16387

10/25/96

Dismissed
17153

#### Knight Development Corp. v. Bays

January 22, 1997

Order No. 97-7

Affirmed
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition 

is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

05-3151 

MASON B. BROWN, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 

Respondent. 

__________________________ 

DECIDED: August 5, 2005 

__________________________ 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER and LINN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

Mason B. Brown (“Brown”) petitions for review of the decision of the Merit 

Systems Protection Board (“Board”) dismissing his appeal of his removal without 

prejudice pending the outcome of a criminal investigation into his conduct that 

precipitated his removal. Brown v. Dep’t of the Treasury, No. AT-0752-04-0289-I-1 

(M.S.P.B. May 27, 2004) (“Initial Decision”). The full Board denied his petition for 

review, and the Initial Decision became the final decision of the Board. Because Brown 

has not shown that the Board abused its discretion in dismissing his appeal without 

prejudice, we affirm. 
Brown was removed from the Treasury Department based on a charge of 

fraudulent use of identification documents and information and a charge of misuse of a 

social security number. Initial Decision, slip op. at 1. Because the matter had been 

referred for prosecution, at least some of the evidence could not be disclosed because it 

had been subpoenaed by a Grand Jury. Id. at 2. The Board, therefore, dismissed 

Brown’s appeal without prejudice, allowing Brown the option of re-filing his appeal within 

45 days from the date the criminal matter is resolved or, alternatively, within 20 days 

after expiration of six months from the date of the Initial Decision. Id. at 2-3. Although 

Brown argues that the Board committed error because he is innocent of the charges, 

the merits of Brown’s complaint are not before us. Brown’s complaint has not been 

decided, and the dismissal without prejudice gives Brown the opportunity to timely re-file 

his appeal and the opportunity to have the propriety of his dismissal adjudicated on the 

merits once the criminal matter is resolved. Whether Brown actually committed the acts 

of which he is charged is not the issue. The only issue before this court is whether the 

Board abused its discretion in dismissing his appeal without prejudice. See 5 U.S.C. 

§ 7703(c)(1) (2000). Because Brown has not shown that the Board abused its 

discretion in dismissing his appeal without prejudice pending resolution of the criminal 

matter, we affirm. 

05-3151 2
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Domestic Soil

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS defines domestic soil as soil from the continental United States. Soil from

Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands is handled as foreign soil and

is authorized movement into the continental U.S. under the provisions described for

foreign soil.

APHIS restricts the interstate movement of domestic soil from areas within the

continental United States that are under quarantine for various plant pests or

diseases, if soil can harbor those pests or diseases. The map at the link below

provides an overview of domestic quarantines that affect the movement of soil.

Federal Domestic Quarantines for Movement of Soil within the Continental United

States.(PDF)

In certain cases, the movement of domestic soil from quarantined areas may be

authorized under a compliance agreement established between the local APHIS

office and the person or firm responsible for handling the soil. Authorized movement

options vary, based on the pest of concern, the corresponding regulations in 7 CFR

301, and the purpose for moving the soil. Please contact the USDA-APHIS-PPQ State

Plant Health Director in your state for further information.
#### Namahoe v. Administrative Director of Courts.

17898

12/13/96

Affirmed
#### Magbual v. State

22634

08/16/2000

Vacated and Remanded
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
CDI Corp.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-7263,
333-65879, 333-69007 and 333-34508 on Form S-8 of CDI Corp. and in Registration
Statement No. 333-9793 on Form S-3 of CDI Corp. of our report dated February 20,
2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CDI Corp. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2000 and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K/A of CDI Corp.






Philadelphia, PA                                         /s/ KPMG LLP
May 8, 2001                                     ------------------------------
                                                           KPMG LLP


                                      -5-
#### Casumpang v. ILWU, Local 142

22726

11/20/2000

Denied

94 Hawai’i 330, 13 P.3d 1235
#### State v. Drane

18334

4/25/97

Reversed and Remanded
20160

#### State v. Boaz

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 29, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 123 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-83, CP2024-85.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-26821 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, D. Geoffrey Shulman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: August 10, 2004                    /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

                         
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
                                     

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
                               
<CASH>                                               1,184
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          129
<ALLOWANCES>                                             1
<INVENTORY>                                            514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,914
<PP&E>                                                 749
<DEPRECIATION>                                         229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  501
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          3,120
<COMMON>                                                30
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,728
<SALES>                                                286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       286
<CGS>                                                  222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (784)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (784)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>