April 30 , 2015

Mark Wolf Steve Tippmann Tippmann Construction

9009 Coldwater Road Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 490

- 3000 mwolf@tippmanngroup.com

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request

– Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

Attachments:

1) Phantom 2 Vision + User Manual V1.6

Dear Sir or Madam

,

The purpose of this letter to you today is to petition the Federal A viation Administration for an exemption from certain Federal Aviation Regulations in order for Mark Wolf and / or Steve Tippmann to operate an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) to perform aerial photography and video for real estate development and construction progress and sites in the United States. As representatives of Tippmann Construction, w e would like to be able to utilize a UAS to enhance our company’s documentation and marketing of our projects. We have already logged more than 15 hours of flight tim e as hobbyist s with the specific UAS that is the subject of this petition.

In accordance with the FAA’s Guidelines for Submitting a Petition for Exemption under Section

333 of the FAA Moderni zation and Reform Act of 2012, We , Mark Wolf , Steve Tippmann , and Tippmann Construction, a re submitting t he following information with our request:

Petitioner (s) : Mark Wolf Steve Tippmann Tippmann Construction

9009 Coldwater Road Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 490

- 3000 mwolf@tippmanngroup.comDescription of Operations

A. The UAS that is the subject of this Petition

a. DJI Phantom 2 Vision +

b. DJI Phantom 3

Tippmann Construction currently owns a DJI Phantom 2 Vision + with a serial number of PH645385324

, including the DJI factory mounted camera, along with the associa ted remote control unit, and DJI Vision app for iPhone which provides a first person view of what the camera is seeing in real time. This unit is a quad

- copter with an advertised weight of 1,242 grams (including battery and propellers). Similar units

hav e been the subject of prior exemptions by the FAA (examples include: Brian M. Walk / Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Exemption No. 11445, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0143; Daniel Achatz / Exemption No. 11434, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0201). The DJI Ph antom 3 is not currently owned by Tippmann Construction, however, it will be purchased in the future to improve and enhance the aerial video and photography of our sites.

The associated remote control unit utilizes an operating frequency of 5.728 GHz

– 5.8 5 GHz and a Range Extender that utilizes an operating frequency of 2412

- 2462 MHz. The communication distance between the remote control unit and the Phantom is 800m. The UAS also is equipped with a fail

- safe return

- to

home mode in the event that the link between the aircraft and the remote control ground station is lost. The UAS can operate for approximately 20

- 25 min utes on a fully charged battery.

B. The UAS Pilot (s) in Command

Mark Wolf and Steve Tippmann ha ve made numerous flights as hobbyist s with this aircraft, accumulating more than 15 hours of flight time with the Subject UAS.

C. UAS Operating Parameters and Intended Flight Profile

Mark Wolf is a Marketing professional and has been the primary photographer for Tippmann Construction for more than 12 year s. He has traveled the country visiting job sites, active construction projects, and completed warehouses photographing these projects and facilities from all angles. Steve Tippmann is the Executive Vice President at Tippmann Construction and also has more than 10 years of experience as a hobbyist photographer, while also frequently photographi ng projects for Tippmann

Construction. Safety is the top priority when vis iting these sites, whether photographing from the ground

or the air.

The following UAS Operating Procedures will be adopted and followed each time the UAS is flown:

1. All flights will be flown below 300 feet and within a radius distance of 800 feet from the remote control ground unit.

2. The Pilot In Command will have direct line of sight visual observation of the UAS at all times, and will operate the UAS only within direct line of sight.

3. There will be times when the UAS is flown in close proximity , within 20

- 25 feet of the structure under construction or a completed building. When this occurs, the UAS will be operated at less than 3 miles per hour.4. Prior to the start of a flight, a pre

- flight checklist will be thoroughly completed. This includes verifying a GPS lost

- link procedure which will safely return the UAS in the event of a loss of communication between the aircraft and the remote control, as well as other standard safety checks and compass calibration as recommended by the manufacturer. Specific wea ther conditions are also addressed at this time, and the UAS will not be flown in adverse weather conditions, such as heavy wind, rain or snow.

5. If the need arises for a flight to be within 5 miles of an airport, the flight will only occur after permission has been granted by the appropriate control tower.

Sections of 14 CFR From Which Pet itioner is Seeking an Exemption

14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H Certification procedures for products and parts, Airworthiness

Certificates

14 CFR Part 36 Noise Standards; Air craft Type and Airworthiness

Certification
14 CFR § 45.23 Display of marks; general

14 CFR Part 61 Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors and Ground Instructors
14 CFR § 91.7 Civil Aircraft Airworthiness
14 CFR § 91.9 Civil Aircraft Flight Manual, Marking and Placard

R equirements
14 CFR § 91.103 Preflight Action
14 CFR § 91.105 Flight Crewmembers at Stations
14 CFR § 91.109 Flight Instruction
14 CFR § 91.119 Minimum Safe Altitudes: General
14 CFR § 91.121 Altimeter Settings
14 CFR § 91.151 Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions
14 CFR § 91.203 Civil Aircraft: Certifications Required
14 CFR § 91.207 Emergency Locator Transmitters 14 CFR Part 91, Subpart E Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance and Alterations

Extent of Relief Sought and Reasons for Seeking the Exemption

14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H

– FAR Part 21 establishes the procedures for issuance of certificates of airworthiness, as mandated by 49 U.S.C. § 44704. Under Section 333 and 49 U.S.C. § 44701 (b), the FAA may exempt aircraft from airworthiness certification. The petitioner requests an exem ption from the requirements of this part because the size, weight, speed, operational capability and proximity to airports

in which the UAS will be flown pose significantly less of a risk than those risks posed by conventional aircraft. Manned aircraft p ose risks to the life and safety of the crew; that is not a consideration with the subject UAS. Risks to third parties are also minimized given the lightweight and slow speed at which the Subject UAS would operate. Nor are there risks of fuel spilling or fire in the event of an accident. Because of these factors, the petitioner requests that the FAA waive the requirement that the subject UAS require an airworthiness certificate.

14 CFR Part 36

– FAR Part 36, Subparts A, F and O establish certain noise st andards for certification of various aircraft types. Because the subject UAS would not have an airworthiness certificate, and given its small size and minimal noise impact, the petitioner requests an exemption from FAR Part 36.14 CFR § 45.23

– FAR 45.23 establishes marking requirements for aircraft; paragraph (b) mandates the registration number be displayed in letters not less than two inches in height. The subject UAS is too small to accommodate the type

- size requirement. The petitioner request and ex emption from this part.

14 CFR Part 61

– FAR Part 61 sets for th the certification requirements for pilots. Because the subject UAS would not have an airworthiness certificate, and given its small size and minimal risk factor, the petitioner requests an ex emption from FAR Part 61, t hat would allow him to operate the subject UAS for

aerial video and photography projects

. Both petitioners on this request currently hold a valid TWIC (Transportation Worker Identification Credential) card, and have gone through the necessary background checks by the TSA in order to determine that neither Mr. Wolf nor Mr. Tippmann pose a threat to national security.

14 CFR § 91.7

– FAR 91.7

– (a) No person may operate an aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

To the e xtent that “airworthy” is defined as requiring an airworthiness certificate, the petitioner requests an exemption from this FAR for the same reasons ad identified in petitioner’s request for an exemption of 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H. Petitioner will not, however, operate the subject UAS if it is not in a condition for safe flight, as required under FAR 91.7 (b).

14 CFR § 91.9

– FAR 91.9

– requires that all aircraft have certain markings, placards and on

- board flight manuals. Petitioner request s an exemption from this requirement for the same reasons as stated in in petitioner’s request for exemption under 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H.

14 CFR § 91.103

– FAR 91.103

– mandate s certain pre

- flight action. Petitioner will take all necessary

pre

- flight a ction, but requests an exemption from this requirement based on the interpretation of this requiring pre

- flight actions that are appropriate to manned aircraft only.

14 CFR § 91.105

- FAR 91.105

– requires that crewmembers be at designated stations, with safety belts fastened, etc. Petitioner requests an exemption to this due to the fact that the subject UAS is unmanned.

14 CFR § 91.109

– FAR 91.109

– requires that persons operating an aircraft for flight instruction may not

do so unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. Petitioner requests an exemption due to the fact that the subject UAS does not have a second controller or dual control capability, which is consistent with other, similar UAS units.

14 CFR § 91.119

– FAR 91.119

– indicat es the minimum safe altitudes over various areas. Petitioner requests an exemption to this, due to the fact that the subject UAS is intended to be a low

- flying device in order to capture aerial video and photography.

14 CFR § 91.121

– FAR 91.121

– require s various altimeter settings in order to maintain a level flight. Petitioner requests an exemption from this FAR as the subject UAS will not have an altimeter that matches the requirements of this FAR. Altitude will be monitored through the DJI Vision a pp, and the unit will be kept below 300 feet as designated by the indications within that app.

14 CFR § 91.151

– FAR 91.151

– sets forth requirements for amount of fuel on any given flight.

Petitioner requests an exemption from this FAR because the subject UAS operates on battery power. The subject UAS will only be operated when there is a minimum of 5 minutes of battery power remaining.

14 CFR § 91.203

– FAR 91.203

– requires that a civil aircraft have an airworthiness certificate and a registratio n certificate. Petitioner requests an exemption from this FAR because of the reasons stated in petitioner’s request for an exemption under 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H.14 CFR § 91.207

– FAR 91.207

– prohibits operation of a US

– registered aircraft unless it is equipped with an emergency locator transmitter. Given the limited distance of flights with the subject UAS, and the fact that it will be flown with direct line of sight visibil ity, petitioner requests an exemption from this

FAR.

14 CFR § Part 91, Subpart E

– requires that owners or operators of aircraft have the aircraft inspected at certain intervals, and by certain mechanics. Petitioner requests an exemption from this Subpart because the subject UAS has a maintenance and trouble

- shooting program that is best executed by the owner/operator and is different from that of manned aircraft.

How this request would benefit the public

Aerial photography and video normally require the u se of a manned aircraft, either a small airplane or helicopter , adding to already congested airspace. Use of a low

- flying and slow moving UAS does not significantly impact the airspace as it is flown at a lower altitude and is more maneuverable and precis e than larger, manned aircraft. This also enhances safety around the area being photographed, while also reducing environmental impacts caused by emissions from manned aircraft.

Operations with this UAS will serve property owners a better perspective for progress, details and benefits of the subject being photographed which cannot be achieved by taking photographs from the ground or at higher altitudes in a manned aircraft. Low level aerial photography, as provided by a UAS is also a valuable marketing t ool that can lead to increased business. This type of photography can also improve work site efficiency in the construction industry by providing a perspective that cannot be seen through other efforts.

Why this exemption will not adversely affect safety

A pre

- flight checklist will be performed prior to each flight to ensure the subject UAS is working properly before taking flight. Because the subject UAS is battery powered and does not carry any flammable fuels,

there is little to no risk of fire in the event of an accident. The unit will also always be within a direct visual line of sight of the operator of the aircraft, in order to prevent the subject UAS from flying too close to any structure or people near the site being flown.

The subject UAS is a very small aircraft, weighing less than 5 pounds, and the likelihood of damage to property or injury to an individual in the event of a mishap is extremely low. Aerial photography in general is still utilized very often, and the risk associated with usi ng the subject UAS is significantly

lower than the risk of traditional aerial photography using an airplane or helicopter.

The subject UAS also has a lost

- link fail safe function that is a part of the system, allowing the unit to

return to its home base if the link between the remote controller and the unit is lost.

Summary for publishing in the Federal Register

Petition for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012:

Petitioner is seeking an exemption from the following Fed eral Aviation Regulations: 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H ; 14 CFR Part 36 ; 14 CFR § 45.23 ; 14 CFR Part 61 ; 14 CFR § 91.7 ; 14 CFR § 91.9 ; 14 CFR § 91.103 ; 14 CFR § 91.105 ; 14 CFR § 91.109 ; 14 CFR § 91.119 ; 14 CFR § 91.121 ; 14 CFR § 91.151 ; 14 CFR § 91.203 ; 14 CFR § 91.207 ; 14 CFR Part 91, Subpart EDescription of the exemption being sought: The petitioner seeks an exemption from the above

- referenced Federal Aviation Regulations to conduct aerial photography using a small, light unmanned aircraft fo r the purpose of acquiring photo and video documentation of real estate development and construction progress and sites in order to provide these images and videos to the owners or representatives of these properties.

Conclusion

Mr. Wolf and Mr. Tippmann w ould like to thank the FAA for considering our request. Please do not

hesitate to contact us if there is a need for additional information.

Respectfully Submitted,

Mark Wolf Steve Tippmann Tippmann Construction Tippmann Construction

Pe titioner Petitioner