alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

I, Mark R. Tauscher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLCSystems Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) [Not Applicable];

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 |   | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EX-32.1
      CERTIFICATION OF CEO/CFO  (Pursuant
      to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





CERTIFICATION





Each
      officer signing below certifies that:




With
      respect to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Report"), for the Fiscal
      Quarter Ended April 30, 2007, of Franklin Lake Resources Inc. ("Issuer"),
      containing financial statements of Issuer, filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act"):





1
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Act; and





2
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Issuer.








Dated:
      June 13, 2007





/s/
                  Father Gregory OfieshPresident
                  & CEO and Acting Chief Financial
                  Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07
- 13
- 00302
- CR
KRISTOPHER TONY GARC IA, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 242nd District Court

Hale County, Texas Trial Court No. B19066
- 1202, Honorable Edward Lee Self, Presiding



### March 25 , 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Kristopher Tony Garcia, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle , 1 a state jail felony, and was placed on deferred adjudication for a period of three years , pursuant to a plea bargain . Subsequently, the State filed a motion to adjudicate appellant. At the hearing on the motion to adjudicate, appellant entered pleas of true to the allegations made by the State. Thereafter, the trial court found the allegations to be true and after hearing the evidence on

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 31.07 (West 2011).2

punishment, sentence d appellant to two years in a St ate Jail Facility. Appellant gave notice of appeal. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court. Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id

. at 744

– 45. In compliance with High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw , and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The Court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appellant has not filed a response. By his Anders brief, counsel reviewed all grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to de termine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We have found no such arguable grounds and agre e with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.3

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted, and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed

. 2

Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not publish.

2 Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant = s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 48.4.
12/17/2010 12:47 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 1001/003 

Before the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration -PARTWENTOF 

•ASPORTATION 

:r OPERATIONS 

In the matter of 

M & R HELICOPTERS 

Docket No. TBA 

FAA Case No. 2009SO950434 

M'p// 

COMPLAINANT*S MOTTON REQUESTING AN ORDER TO IMPOSE A 

PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FQRflLTNG DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND 

DISCOVERY 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.217 and 13.218, Complainant files this motion 

requesting an order to impose a procedural schedule for the filing of di.spositive motions 

and discovery in this matter. In support of this motion, Complainant cites the necessity to 

control the procedural aspects of this case so that neither party files unnecessary or 

redundant pleadings that squanders scarce judicial resources. Complainant notes that 

M&R has filed numerous dispositive motions within the past few weeks and that many of 

these motions are redundant and procedurally defective, A procedural order will assist 

the parties and the trier of fact in having this case presented in an orderly, relevant, and 

concise manner. 
12/17/2010 12:47 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 1002/00 3 

Accordingly, Complainant requests that the ALJ assigned to this case issue a 

procedural order impo.sing on the parties reasonable limitations on the filing of 

dispositive motions and discovery. 

Respectfiilly submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

Date: December 10, 2010 

By:<: ^/vo 

/(<T*^ Laura Ponto 

-:TAttorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202)267-9863 

Facsimile: (202)267-5106 
12/17/201 0 12:4 7 FAX 202493514 2 FAA * DMS 12003/003 

Certificate of Service 

1 hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt, a copy of Complainant's Motion Requesting An Order To Impose 

A Procedural Schedule For Filing Di.spositive Motions And Discovery, in FAA Case 

No. 2009SO950434, addressed to: 

Dr. Michael B. Selig 

President 

M &R Helicopters, LLC 

2045 Wcstgatc Dr., Suite 205 

Bethlehem, PA 18017 

In addition, f hereby ccrlify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Dated: December 10, 2010
#### Baker v. Quintal

23739

05/23/2002

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insurance Auto
Auctions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas C. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date:  November 13, 2002


                                      /s/ Thomas C. O'Brien
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Thomas C. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer





         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insurance Auto
Auctions, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott P. Pettit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



Date:  November 13, 2002
                                      /s/ Scott P. Pettit
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Scott P. Pettit, Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
Page _______ of _________

PCN 519 PCN Self-Sanitation Tracking Sheet

Indicate Quarter  Qtr. 1 January –March  Qtr. 2: April-June  Qtr. 3: July-September  Qtr.4: October- December

 Farm Name:_____________________________ Operator/Cooperator:________________________________

Date and 

Time

Type Equipment 

Description

(Tractor, plow, 

cultivator...)

Equipment 

Identification

(Make and Model, Serial 

number, Tractor/truck 

number, license plate 

number...)

Qty Location (Moved From) Destination (Moved To) Cleaned by (Name) Name of certifying 

individual
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0649 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TYLER FREDERICK ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 23 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0649
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2016

NO. 03-14-00555-CR

John Charles Terry, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES ROSE, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Appellant 

John Charles Terry has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the 

motion, allows appellant to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### Doe Children, In re

24854

08/08/2003

Affirmed
Docket No. FAA-2012-1076

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 12/9/11

Regional Airline Association 12/9/11

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12/9/11

ATA Joe White 12/9/11
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Liability: Will Citations Hurt My

License?

Last Modified: 

Print

Attending Veterinarian Information - Select a Topic - ▾ Go

The duties performed by the attending veterinarian to ensure compliance with the

Animal Welfare Act and Regulations are ultimately the responsibility of the licensee

or registrant. The licensee or registrant must provide the attending veterinarian with

adequate authority to carry out their functions.

The Animal Welfare Act grants the USDA authority over regulated facilities. We do

not have the authority to pursue action against the attending veterinarian.

Citations for failure to provide adequate veterinary care are often due to not

recognizing animal injury or illness, not contacting the attending veterinarian about

animal health issues, or not following the instructions of the attending veterinarian.

When these issues are cited on a USDA inspection, it reinforces the attending

veterinarian’s authority for the provision of adequate veterinary care.

Facilities may be subject to penalties or other sanctions for failing to comply with the

Animal Welfare Act or Regulations, but not the attending veterinarian.

Animal Welfare Inspection Guide
What about an attending veterinarian’s DEA

(Drug Enforcement Agency) license?

The use and dispensing of controlled substances is solely at the discretion of the

attending veterinarian, and as directed by the program of veterinary care.

The Animal Welfare Act and Regulations do not require attending veterinarians to

dispense controlled substances to regulated facilities.  Attending veterinarians

should follow all state and DEA requirements and their own personal judgment when

it comes to dispensing controlled substances.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26999]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNIFIED CARRIER REGISTRATION PLAN


Sunshine Act Meetings--Notice of Cancellation

    The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Enforcement Subcommittee has 
cancelled the virtual subcommittee meeting previously scheduled for 
December 4, 2023, 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., Eastern time.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Leaman, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors, (617) 305-3783, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#244148414549454a64464b4556400a5147560a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85e0e9e0e4e8e4ebc5e7eae4f7e1abf0e6f7abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

Alex B. Leath,
Chief Legal Officer, Unified Carrier Registration Plan.
[FR Doc. 2023-26999 Filed 12-5-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-YL-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6639** 

CHARLES DELAND JACKSON, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States Distri ct Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 01157

- JCC

- IDD )

Submitted : November 17, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published p er curiam opinion
.
Charles Deland Jackson, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se
. Rosemary Virginia Bourne , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
C harles Deland Jackson, Jr. , seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by d emonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distric t court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We hav e independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny all of Jackson’s pending motions and w e dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Safeguarding Natural Heritage

Last Modified: 

Print

Every year since 2007, APHIS has collaborated with Tribal colleges and universities

(TCUs), and other Native American Serving Institutions, to deliver Safeguarding

Natural Heritage (SNH), a 2-week summer outreach program that helps students

ages 14-17 explore careers in plant and animal science, wildlife management, and

agribusiness.  

Students participate in hands-on labs, workshops, discussion groups, field trips, and

character- and team-building activities led by Tribal elders, practitioners, and

professionals, university professors, and U.S. Government scientists while living on a

college campus. 

Sample activities include: studying the life cycles and habits of insects

(entomologists); inspect and regulate certain genetically engineered organisms

(biotechnologists); examining cells and tissues under a microscope to identify

diseases (plant pathologists); working to conserve and manage wild animals and

their habitats (wildlife biologists); carrying out animal health programs

(veterinarians); learning about on the humane care and treatment of animals

(veterinarians and animal care inspectors); and studying the business aspects of

protecting plants and animals (agribusiness). 
Students chosen to participate in SNH pay only the cost of transportation to and

from the college/university campus.  All other costs—including tuition, room and

board, and laboratory supplies—will be covered by APHIS. 

In 2023, APHIS’ SNH partners will include the College of Menominee Nation, Diné

College, Navajo Technical University, the University of North Carolina at Pembroke,

Fond Du Lac Tribal and Community College and Salish Kootenai College. To learn

more about possible opportunities at these specific institutions, please use the

contact information provided below.  For general information about SNH, please

contact APHIS National Tribal Liaison Terry Clark at (301) 440-4388 or

Terry.W.Clark@usda.gov, or Assistant National Tribal Liaison Carl Etsitty at (970)

494-7573 or Carl.Etsitty@usda.gov.

Participating SNH Schools, 2023

College of Menominee Nation

N172 Highway 47/55, 

P.O. Box 1179, 

Keshena, WI 54135  

Contact: Matilda Peters

715-799-5600, ext. 3251 

mpeters@menominee.edu

Diné College

P.O. Box C01, 

Tsaile, AZ 86556    

Contact: Benita Litson 

928-724-6940 

blitson@dinecollege.edu  

Navajo Technical University

NM State Highway 371 & NN9

P.O. Box 849

Crownpoint, NM 87313  

Contact: Germaine Daye 

505-786-4150 

landgrant@navajotech.edu
University of North Carolina at Pembroke

P.O. Box 1510

Pembroke, NC 28372    

Contact: Mary Beth Locklear 

910-775-4020 

mary.locklear@uncp.edu

Salish Kootenai College

58138 Highway 93

Pablo, MT 59855  

Contact: Virgil Dupuis 

406-275-4800, ext. 4899 

virgil_dupuis@skc.edu

Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College

2101 14th Street

Cloquet, MN 55720  

Contact: Ronald Willis 

218-879-0862 

ronald.willis@fdltcc.edu

Publications

Safeguarding Natural Heritage 2023: Strengthening American Agriculture by

Investing in Youth
th
 /s/ Joseph T. DunsmoreJoseph T. Dunsmore




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Subramanian KrishnanSubramanian Krishnan




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Guy C. JacksonGuy C. Jackson




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Kenneth E. MillardKenneth E. Millard




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Ahmed NawazAhmed Nawaz




---



##### 



th
 /s/ William N. PriesmeyerWilliam N. Priesmeyer




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Bradley J. WilliamsBradley J. Williams
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

The Asian Longhorned Tick: What

You Need to Know Story Map

Last Modified: 

Print