alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Ethan Allen Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Larkin G. Mead

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1876

Location
      
National Statuary Hall

This statue of Ethan Allen was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Vermont in 1876.

Founder of the State of Vermont, Ethan Allen was born in Litchfield, Connecticut, on January 21, 1738. As an explorer, he became involved in the "Hampshire Grants" dispute regarding conflicting land claims between New Hampshire and New York. As a result of the 1770 New York Supreme Court decision invalidating the New Hampshire grants, the settlers formed the Green Mountain Boys with Allen as their colonel commander to defend their property. The skirmishes escalated to such a degree that Allen was outlawed by Governor George Clinton of New York in 1771.

During the Revolutionary War, Allen and his Green Mountain Boys joined forces with Colonel Benedict Arnold to capture Fort Ticonderoga on May 10, 1775. While invading British-held Canada with Colonel John Brown, Allen was captured on September 25, 1775, and held prisoner for two years before being exchanged. He immediately received the brevet rank of colonel in the Continental Army.

He returned to Vermont and was made major general in the Vermont militia. Allen petitioned the Continental Congress for Vermont's statehood. When refused, he negotiated with Britain over the status of Vermont and was accused of treason. Allen died on February 12, 1789, two years before Vermont was admitted into the Union. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 84710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26741]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Royalty Board

37 CFR Part 386

[Docket No. 23-CRB-0010-SA-COLA (2024)]


Cost of Living Adjustment to Satellite Carrier Compulsory License 
Royalty Rates; Correction

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), Library of Congress.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of November 29, 2023, regarding the cost of living adjustment 
(COLA) to the royalty rates that satellite carriers pay for a 
compulsory license under the Copyright Act.

DATES: Effective January 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Brown, (202) 707-7658, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d6e7f6f4d61626e236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7a4b5a587aba8a4e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2023-26122, appearing on page 
83354 in the Federal Register of Wednesday, November 29, 2023, the 
following corrections are made:


Sec.  386.2   [Corrected]

0
1. On page 83354, in the second column, in part 386, in amendment 2, 
the instruction ``Section 386.2 is amended by adding paragraphs 
(b)(1)(xiv) and (b)(2)(xiv) to read as follows:'' is corrected to read 
``Section 386.2 is amended by adding paragraphs (b)(1)(xv) and 
(b)(2)(xv) to read as follows:''.

    Dated: November 30, 2023.
David P. Shaw,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. 2023-26741 Filed 12-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-72-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0649

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TYLER FREDERICK ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0649
Emergency Workers Compensation Packet

The Federal Employee’s Compensation Act (FECA) provides workers’ compensation 

benefits to employees for disability or death sustained as a result of injury or disease 

while in the performance of their duties. Workers’ compensation benefits include: 

medical compensation/reimbursements, wage loss, medical supplies and equipment, 

rehabilitation and compensation based on permanent impairment.

FECA is administered by the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs (OWCP). The program is divided into district offices across the 

country. The Architect of the Capitol (AOC) falls under the jurisdiction of District 25, 

which is responsible for adjudicating cases in Maryland, District of Columbia and 

Virginia. The telephone number is 202.513.6800.

The AOC has prepared the following packet to be provided to employees (or their 

dependant(s)/representative) if an injury, disease or death occurs as a result of a major 

disaster. Supervisors and/or managers are to assist their employees by completing form 

CA-1* (Notice of Traumatic Injury) or CA-2* (Claim for Occupational Disease) as 

applicable using the Employee Compensation Operations and Management Portal 

(ECOMP).

If the injured employee requires emergency medical treatment you may authorize 

medical treatment by completing a form CA-16, Authorization for examination and/or 

treatment. You should also provide a form CA-17, Duty Status Report and a CA-20, 

Attending Physician’s Report. The following forms below should be used as needed.

Form Title

CA-1 Notice of Traumatic Injury

CA-2 Notice of Occupational Disease Claim

CA-2a Notice of Recurrence

CA-5 Claim for Compensation by Widow/Widower and or Children

CA-5b Claim for Compensation by Parents, Brother, Sisters, Grandparents or 

Grandchildren 

CA-6 Official Superior’s Report of Employee’s Death

CA-7 Claim for Compensation

CA-17 Duty Status Report
CA-20 Attending Physician’s Report

OWCP-915 Claim for Medical Reimbursement

OWCP-1500 Health Insurance Claim Form (aka HCFA 1500)

All forms should be submitted to and/or processed through the AOC’s Workers’

Compensation Program Unit. Points of contact for this unit are Eleanor Shields and 

Dominic Powell. They can be reached at 202.226.2548.

*Traumatic Injury – When the exact time and date of an injury can be identified.

*Occupational Disease – When an injury/condition happens over a period of time.

Revised: June 25, 2014
Exhibit
99.3






KPMG
      LLP
              Telephone
              (514)
  840-2100Chartered
      Accountants
              Fax
              (514)
  840-2187600 de
      Maisonneuve Blvd. West
              Internet
              www.kpmg.caSuite
      1500Montréal,
      Québec
      H3A 0A3
   
  Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
 
 The Board
of Directors of
 Canadian
National Railway Company
 
 We
consent to the use of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm dated February 5, 2009 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Canadian National Railway Company as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008, and our Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm dated February 5, 2009 on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which is included in this
annual report on Form 40-F of Canadian National Railway Company for the year
ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated by reference, in the registration
statement (No. 333-147725) on Form F-9 through the 6-K filing on February 5,
2009.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ KPMG
LLP Chartered
Accountants
 
 Montréal,
Canada
 February
5, 2009
         KPMG LLP is a
      Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the
      KPMG
                network of
      independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International
      Cooperative
                (“KPMG
      International”), a
      Swiss entity.
                KPMG Canada
      provides services to KPMG LLP.
27 P.3d 409

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

June 7, 2001

23289

#### Constantino v. State

Affirmed
#### Poe v. Rezentes

20486

5/12/98

Affirmed
#### New Amsterdam Import Company, Inc., Appellant, *v.*L & S Delivery & Transfer Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate ¡Term, First Department,

February 11, 1959.

*103*Levy & Sonet (Daniel Levy*of counsel), for appellant.

*Robert F. Mitchell, Jr.,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant’s unilateral mistake of fact as to the method of delivery required by the contract was not such as would relieve it of its obligations thereunder, since the plaintiff changed its position in reliance upon the agreement *(Abner M. Harper, Inc.*v. *Newburgh,*159 App. Div. 695).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judg-' ment directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $574.70, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
wor-ex1066_22.htm



Exhibit 10.66

ANNUAL BASE SALARIES APPROVED FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

OF

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

 

In June 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”) approved base salary increases for the following executive officers of the Registrant who either are named executive officers of the Registrant for purposes of the disclosure included in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 27, 2017 and/or will be named executive officers of the Registrant for purposes of the disclosure to be included in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 26, 2018, which will become effective August 26, 2018. 

 


	
Name and Principal Position
	
 
	
 
	
Base Salary

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
John P. McConnell

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant
	
 
	
 
	
$
	
682,954

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Mark A. Russell

President and Chief Operating Officer of the Registrant
	
 
	
 
	
$
	
574,053

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
B. Andrew Rose

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
	
 
	
 
	
$
	
518,886

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Geoffrey G. Gilmore

President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation
	
 
	
 
	
$
	
519,120

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Virgil L. Winland

Senior Vice President-Manufacturing of the Registrant
	
 
	
 
	
$
	
387,198

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
John G. Lamprinakos

President-The Worthington Steel Company
	
 
	
 
	
$
	
386,250
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7517

VICTOR ROBERTS, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00331-JBF) Submitted: February 23, 2007 Decided: March 20, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Victor Roberts, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roberts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
FOR INFORMATION AND ACTION

DA 2020-01 

January 17, 2020

 

SUBJECT: APHIS Adds Infested Fields in the Pale Cyst Nematode Regulated Area in Idaho

TO: State and Territory Agricultural Regulatory Officials

On November 6, 2019, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) confirmed pale 

cyst nematode (Globodera pallida: PCN) in two potato production fields (a total of 169 acres) 

located in Bingham County, Idaho. These infested fields are located within the 8.5-mile radius 

PCN-regulated area that spans a portion of northern Bingham County and southern Bonneville 

County. With these detections, since program inception, the number of PCN-infested fields is 31

and the infested area is 3,446 acres. 

APHIS collected cysts from these fields during routine delimiting surveys. The first field was 

already in suspect status following the detection of a non-viable PCN cyst in a 2018 soil 

sample. The second field is adjacent to, and associated with, one of the infested fields in which 

APHIS detected PCN in 2018. Both fields have historically close associations with other 

infested fields and are already in the PCN-regulated area. 

APHIS will update the PCN program website description of regulated areas as needed after the 

trace investigation for these detections is completed. 

APHIS applied safeguarding measures on the interstate movement of PCN-regulated articles 

from these areas as required in the PCN regulations. APHIS will follow-up with a notice of this 

change to the regulated area in the Federal Register. The specific PCN-regulated areas are on 

the following website: 

https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pestsand-diseases/nematode/pcn

For additional information about the pale cyst nematode program, please call National Policy 

Manager, Lynn Evans-Goldner, at (301) 851-2286.

/s/

Osama A. El-Lissy

Deputy Administrator

Plant Protection and Quarantine
#### Sortino v. Salas

23842

05/09/2002

Affirmed
Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@aphis.usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

Credit: Dog illustration at upper right created by Cristiano Zoucas from the Noun Project AC-18-001 • Issued June 2018

ANIMAL CARE AID

Coat Care: Preventing Matted Hair

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about skin issues in dogs. 

Refer to the other topics covered in the series for more information on skin, feet, and ear care.

WHY IS HAIR OR FUR IMPORTANT TO DOG 

HEALTH AND WELL-BEING?

DID YOU KNOW? 

Mats are commonly found under the collar, 

behind the ears, and in the armpits—areas 

where there is rubbing.

Don’t Forget 

Feet and Ears! 

These areas mat easily and can trap moisture that 

may lead to skin infections. Removing hair from 

the top and under the ear flap and the bottom of 

the feet in between the paw pads is the best way 

to prevent problems. 

How Do I Keep My Dog’s Coat 

Healthy and Mat-Free?

It’s best to prevent mats by regular brushing and 

grooming. The frequency of brushing, whether daily 

or weekly, is going to vary by breed, type, and length 

of hair. 

When mats occur, they can be removed by shaving

with clippers or cutting with scissors even if the dog 

is not due to be groomed.

l be painful

l cause skin irritation

l hide foreign bodies, such as 

ingrown collars

l hide tumors, injuries, or other 

skin disease

l trap foreign material such as 

leaves, twigs, mud, urine, or feces

MATTED HAIR MAY: 

It protects the skin from chemicals, bacteria, and physical injury. 

It also helps regulate body temperature:

• Coat glossiness reflects sunlight to aid in cooling.

• It also acts as a barrier to block wind, rain, and 

 snow to aid in warming.

• Color, length, and density can help retain or 

 dissipate heat. 

l interfere with vision, hearing, 

and chewing

l interfere with urination 

and defecation

l interfere with normal movement

l interfere with temperature 

regulation, both cooling 

and warming

In order for the coat to be healthy and 

protect the dog, it’s important to keep it 

clean and free of mats.

PRACTICAL TIP

Clippers get hot with use and may burn the skin. Try 

using a clipper cooling product or alternating between 

two pairs of clippers. Scissors can cut the skin as well as the 

mat. Try using blunt-tipped (bandage) scissors.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: J eremy Dion Washington v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number s : 01

- 1 3

- 0 0227

- CR

Trial court case number: 1862 655

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County

The reporter’s record in the above referenced appeal was originally due on April 22

, 201 3

. According to information from the court reporter, the reporter’s record is approximately 350 pages and covers 3 days of testimony. On August 14 , 201 3

, this Court granted the court reporter’s third request for an extension and extended the time to file the reporter’s record to August 21, 2013

, with no further extensions. The court reporter’s record was not filed by that

date. On October 16, 2013 , the Court ordered the court reporter to file the court reporter’s record by November 15, 2013. The court reporter has failed to file the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Sondra Humphrey shall electronically deliver the reporter’s rec ord pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule for Electronic Reporter’s Record to the Clerk of the First Court of Appeals on or before February 28
, 201 4 at 5:00 p.m. If the record is

not filed on or before February 28 , 201 4 , this Court may require Sondra Humphre y to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 6, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      16,018,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              430,330,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,200,000
<INVENTORY>                                371,728,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           816,876,000
<PP&E>                                      29,354,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,213,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             828,017,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      426,669,000
<BONDS>                                    281,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    118,000
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,979,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               828,017,000
<SALES>                                     73,853,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,853,000
<CGS>                                       15,615,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,615,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            76,784,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          26,434,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (44,980,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,925,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (46,905,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.63)


</TABLE>
# C_2019093EN.01001901.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kassel Zweigstelle Hofgeismar (Germany) lodged on 27 April 2018 — Petra Breyer, Heiko Breyer v SUNDAIR GmbH

(Case C-292/18)

(2019/C 93/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Kassel Zweigstelle Hofgeismar

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Petra Breyer, Heiko Breyer

Defendant: Sundair GmbH

By order of 6 December 2018, the Court ruled:

Article 3(5) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in conjunction with Article 2(a) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that an undertaking, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which had lodged an application for an operating licence which was not issued to it at the time for the performance of scheduled flights cannot fall within the scope of that regulation, so that the passengers concerned have no right to compensation under Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7(1) of the regulation.

---