alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000880416
<NAME>NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  688,305
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 17,751
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      77,135
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   261,331
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,044,522
<COMMON>                                         1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  160,999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         67,141
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             228,141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       520,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               20,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             276,381
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>            1,044,522
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  117,335
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         4,593
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  67,762
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  76,835
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     40,500
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           6,848
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              51,828
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    27,364
<NET-INCOME>                                24,464
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               24,464
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    17,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      87,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

File an Animal Welfare Complaint

Last Modified: 

Print

To report a concern about an animal covered under the Animal Welfare Act or the

Horse Protection Act, please complete the form below.

To report a concern about an animal covered under the Animal Welfare Act or the

Horse Protection Act, please complete the form below.

Complaint 

In the box below, please give a detailed description of your concern. The types of

information that would be helpful to us include: the date of the incident; the

type(s) of animal(s) present; the behavior of the animal(s); the condition of the

animal(s); the condition of the facility; the actions of the person with the

animals; the location of the incident; etc.

Name of USDA licensee/registrant (if known) 

USDA license/registration number (if known) 

City/Town 

State/Province - Select - ▾

Details of complaint 
You can choose to remain anonymous; however, providing your contact information

will provide APHIS' Animal Care staff a way to contact you if we need additional

information. Animal Welfare records are located in a Privacy Act System of Records

which requires APHIS to provide the licensee access to his or her own records.

Please be aware that if you choose to provide your contact information, the licensee

will have access to your complaint and your identity if a Privacy Act request is

submitted by the licensee.

Thank you for your interest in the welfare of animals that are covered by the Animal

Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act. We will look into your concerns as soon as

possible. If you would like to know the outcome of your complaint, please make a

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

Information message

○ Yes 

○ No, I would like to remain anonymous 

Can we contact you if we need additional information? 

Name 

Company 

Email 

Phone 

Address 

Apt/Suite 

City/Town 

State/Province - None - ▾

ZIP/Postal Code 

Contact Information 
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information

unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this

information collection is 0579-0377. The time required to complete this information

collection is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining

the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.  

OMB APPROVED

0579-0377

EXP. DATE

8/2015  

Submit Complaint
#### State v. Lussier

23726

05/09/2002

Vacated and Remanded
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________ ________________

No. 16

- 10230
Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:10

- cv

- 02678

- SCJ

CHERI RAU,

Plaintiff

– Appellant

,

versus

D. C. SCHWEIZER, Defendant

- Appellee,

ANDREW SALIBA, Defendant

.

_ _______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ ( October 13, 2016 )

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and ANDERSON

, Circuit Judges.

Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a police officer, plaintiff claims that

the officer procured her false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of the

Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court granted the officer

summary judgment on the ground of qua lified immunity. The plaintiff appeals.

We conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated in the

District Court’s dispositive order of December 22, 2015.

AFFIRMED. Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.2





WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 9, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    David G. Koehler


David G. Koehler


October 18, 2002
#### State v. Edwards

22741

01/23/2001

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis, Panel SEP-1: NCI Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, February 7, 2024, 9:00 a.m. to February 7, 2024, 5:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W108, Rockville, Maryland, 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 17, 2023, FR Doc. 2023-25490, 88 FR 80322.                

This notice is being amended to change the meeting date from February 7, 2024, to February 20, 2024. The meeting location and time will stay the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: December 5, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-27069 Filed 12-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Turner v. State

16631

7/7/95

Denied

79 Hawai'i 118899 P.2d 401
#### DOMINIC DIBIASO, JR. *v.*MICHAEL L. SMETANO ET AL.

(AC 19407)

Foti, Zarella and Healey, Js.

Argued June 8

officially released July 11, 2000

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Regulatory Status Review Table

Last Modified: 

Print

The table below provides regulatory status review (RSR) requests submitted to

APHIS and APHIS’ corresponding responses.

Loading...
# C_2018427EN.01001101.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 16 August 2018 — XW v Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz

(Case C-536/18)

(2018/C 427/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XW

Defendant: Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz

Question referred

May a portion of the salary costs of staff employed in the administration of and in the collection of fees for official inspections be taken into account in a fee collected in accordance with Article 27(2) and (4) of, in conjunction with Annex VI to, Regulation No 882/2004? (1)

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (OJ 2004 L 165, p. 1).

---
September 24, 2001

22794

#### Woodard v. State

Affirmed
H. Res. 581 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 7, 2016. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 1927) to amend title 28, United States Code, to improve fairness in class action litigation. The first reading of 

the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 

confined to the bill and amendments specified in this resolution and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill 

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 

recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed 

in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill 

for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an 

amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 
2 

•HRES 581 EH 

text of Rules Committee Print 114–38. That amendment in 

the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against that amendment in the nature of a 

substitute are waived. No amendment to that amendment in 

the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in 

the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject 

to a demand for division of the question in the House or in 

the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
3 

•HRES 581 EH 

SEC. 2. Further proceedings on any question on a motion relating to the disposition of the veto message and the 

bill, H.R. 3762, may be postponed through the legislative day 

of January 25, 2016, as though under clause 8 of rule XX. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
USDA APHIS Policy Statement for Interstate Movement of Western Corn 

Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera. November 29, 2010. colin.stewart@aphis.usda.gov

The interstate movement of western corn rootworm (WCR) for laboratory use outside of 

an inspected containment facility will be permitted among States in which the beetle 

naturally occurs. Waste materials from all cultures must be disposed of by autoclaving, 

deep freezing, or other approved procedure.

APHIS permits for laboratory, greenhouse, and field studies involving WCR will be valid 

for no more than two years. APHIS will evaluate all WCR sources for field and 

greenhouse studies.

APHIS has designated Illinois as generally infested. The interstate movement of variant 

and non-variant beetles into Illinois under permit from within the continental United 

States for all purposes is allowed.

All companies within the infested zone that wish to ship stock to areas out of the infested 

zone for greenhouse and field studies must have their facilities inspected. These 

companies will have two options. First, insects may be collected in the State or county 

outside of the infested zone, brought back to the rearing facilities under permit, and their 

descendants may be released in the original State or county of origin. Standard operating 

procedures must be in place describing how these cultures from individual locations will 

remain separate. Second, beetles may also be brought in from an approved source such 

as the USDA Agricultural Research Service facility in Brookings, South Dakota, and 

cultured. Their descendants may then be sent to States inside or outside the infested zone 

under permit. Such cultures must have been established after August 2008.

Companies that wish to deliberately perform greenhouse or field studies using the variant 

must do so under a permit separate from those for the non-variant. Variant beetles must 

be collected in a given county, brought back to the approved culturing facility under

permit, and have their descendants released in the original county of collection. Releases

of the variant will only be allowed well inside the generally established infested zone. 

Standard Operating Procedures must be in place.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>       5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,698,690
<SECURITIES>                                   168,982
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,410,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,278,366
<PP&E>                                       5,146,996
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,020,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,404,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,559
<BONDS>                                        600,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,734,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,404,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               920,951
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                544,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            544,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   544,365
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Betty Davis, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

April 30, 1959.

*Martin E. Young*for Lewis O. Lebish, as executor, petitioner.

No other appearances.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The propounded instrument consists of three pages of typewritten text fastened together with wire staples. The subscribing witnesses testified that decedent published and declared all of the pages as together constituting her will. The signature of the decedent and all three witnesses appear at a point approximately one third of the distance from the top of the second page. The remainder of that page is blank. The third page of the instrument, which is designated ‘6 Schedule A ” is neither signed nor witnessed. The text of the schedule, which is incorporated by reference in paragraph First of the will, identifies certain jewelry and other tangible personalty and hence assists in defining the gift made in paragraph First. The testimonium clause describes the instrument so executed as the last will and testament of decedent as “ consisting of two (2) pages and Schedule A

Since the language of paragraph First of the will is sufficient in terms to encompass the jewelry and articles of personalty, independent of the identification of those items under Schedule A, the rule against the incorporation by reference of an unattested paper writing does not forbid the admission of the will and the denial of probate to the schedule. The reference in the *683will to the schedule may be disregarded as surplusage since the will itself makes a complete disposition of the entire estate. *(Matter of Acres,*128 Misc. 254; *Matter of Reins,*59 Misc. 126; *Matter of Emmons,*110 App. Div. 701.)

Submit decree accordingly admitting the will to probate in the words and figures comprising the text prior to the signature and attestation and denying probate to the text appearing in Schedule A.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10234

Conference Calendar

 

BILLY RAY GILBERT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GEORGE R. PIERSON ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:97-CV-407

- - - - - - - - - -

August 18, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Billy Ray Gilbert, Texas prisoner #653239, filed a 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint against Warden George R. Pierson, Disciplinary

Captain J. Chism, and Patron, who acted as counsel substitute at

his disciplinary proceeding. Gilbert alleged that he was falsely

accused and found guilty of verbally threatening Pierson, that

the disciplinary proceeding violated his due process rights, and

that Patron was ineffective. The district court dismissed the
No. 98-10234

-2-

complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (e)(2)(B)(ii). We have

reviewed the record and perceive no error by the district court. 

Gilbert v. Pierson et al., No. 2:97-CV-407 (N.D. Tex. February 3,

1998).

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Tribal Relations - Opportunities for

Native Youth

Last Modified: 

Print

We offer paid internships, summer programs, and other career opportunities for

students and recent graduates of all educational backgrounds.

Safeguarding Natural Heritage 

Every year, APHIS collaborates with Tribal colleges and universities to deliver

Safeguarding Natural Heritage, a 2-week summer outreach program that helps

students ages 14-17 explore careers in plant and animal science, wildlife

management, and agribusiness.
AgDiscovery Program 

APHIS partners with universities and colleges to help teenagers learn about careers

in animal and plant science, wildlife management, and agribusiness. The annual 2-4

week program allows student to live on a college campus and experience hands-on

labs, workshops, and field trips.
William F. Helms Internship Program 

Interested in a career in agriculture, botany, plant pathology, entomology, or other

biological sciences? This program provides university and college-level students with

the opportunity to plan and coordinate pest surveys, participate in Federal

regulatory functions, and assist with domestic plant health programs and activities.
Pathways Programs 

USDA offers different pathway opportunities—including tuition assistance—for

students and recent graduates to work in the agricultural, science, technology,

math, environmental, management, business and many other fields. Several

opportunities with APHIS are available through this program.
Animal Care Externship 

(PDF, 5.12 MB)

Animal Care externships help students gain up to 4 weeks of unpaid work

experience in the fall, spring, and summer. Opportunities may be available

throughout the United States, depending on a student’s area of interest and the

availability of APHIS personnel.
Native American-Serving Institutions Internship Program 

(PDF, 10.68 MB)

Are you a college student interested in animal and plant health? Would you like to

learn about the many career paths open in agriculture and natural resources? We

have a unique opportunity for you.
Navajo Technical University Veterinary Technology Program Partnership 

APHIS partners with Navajo Technical University’s Veterinary Technology Program in

Crownpoint, New Mexico to help advance student career opportunities in veterinary

medicine.