alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 556 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 9, 2015. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 2130) to provide legal certainty to property owners 

along the Red River in Texas, and for other purposes. The 

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 

hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources. 

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under 

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources 

now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of 
2 

•HRES 556 EH 

order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 

Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of December 13, 2015, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as though 
3 

•HRES 556 EH 

under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall 

consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
92 P.3d 490

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Jones

25283

06/21/2004

Vacated & remanded
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6837
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENNIS HOWELL SMITH, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-136-N, CA-95-361-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Howell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith , Nos. CR-89-136-N; CA-95-361-2 (E.D. Va. May 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, D. Geoffrey Shulman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: August 3, 2005                        /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
20107

#### State v. Kaohi

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/    GLENN L. COOPER 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

December 11, 2007
EXHIBIT 23(a)CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-130798 and 333-130797 on
Forms S-8 pertaining to First Financial Service Corporation's 401K/Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated March 12, 2008, on the
consolidated financial statements of First Financial Service Corporation and on First Financial Service Corporation's management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which reports are included in Form 10-K for First Financial Service Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007.

LOGO

Crowe
Chizek and Company LLC

Louisville,
Kentucky
March 12, 2008

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-95282, 333-3438, 333-26135, 333-44281, 333-50679, 333-76991,
and 333-33944) pertaining to the 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995
Director Stock Option Plan, the 1989 Stock Plan, the Nonstatutory Stock Plan,
and the 1998 Stock Plan of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. of our report dated
October 24, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2000.


                                            /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
December 18, 2000
#### Harris v. Progressive Hawaii Ins. Corp.

23000

05/17/2002

Reversed
September 26, 2005

26177

#### Wallen v. Wallen

Affirmed
#### Ermocida v. Destination Resorts Hawai'i, Inc.

26269

01/19/2006

Denied

109 Hawai'i 372, 126 P.3d 415
1

Werner, Christopher

From: Werner, Christopher

Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:28 PM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- 

Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55)

Aaron, to confirm, YES, this red text will be added to the preamble as well as the rule text. 

Chris Werner 

US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Air Quality Policy Division 

(919) 541-5133 

werner.christopher@epa.gov

From: Werner, Christopher 

Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:28 PM 

To: 'Szabo, Aaron' <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>; Lorang, Phil <Lorang.Phil@epa.gov>; Beaver, Melinda 

<Beaver.Melinda@epa.gov> 

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: 

Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55) 

Hi Aaron, thank you for the comments. Please advise whether the below would be acceptable in lieu of what has been 

proposed. Text added by reviewers is in italics and text added by EPA is in red italics: 

The new §51.308(g)(6) is proposed to include a provision requiring a state whose long-term strategy includes a smoke 

management program for prescribed fires on wildland to include a summary of the most recent periodic assessment of 

the smoke management program including conclusions that were reached in the assessment as to whether the program 

is meeting its goals regarding improving ecosystem health and reducing the damaging effects of catastrophic wildfires.

Chris Werner 

US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Air Quality Policy Division 

(919) 541-5133 

werner.christopher@epa.gov

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:53 AM 

To: Lorang, Phil <Lorang.Phil@epa.gov>; Werner, Christopher <Werner.Christopher@epa.gov>; Beaver, Melinda 

<Beaver.Melinda@epa.gov> 

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: 

Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55) 

Attached please find the summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the draft proposed rule 

entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). The interagency 

comments are in response to the last RLSO version submitted to OMB for review. I accepted all changes from that 

version and the interagency comments within this version are new. 

 

Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions. 

 
2

Aaron L. Szabo 

Policy Analyst 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Management and Budget 

202-395-3621 

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-4457

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARGARET SUSAN FAULK, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-99-5-BO) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 30, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosemary Godwin, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Margaret Susan Faulk appeals her convictions and sentence for conspiracy to commit mail theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1994) and receipt and possession of stolen mail and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § § 2 & 1708 (1994). Finding no reversible error, we affirm. On appeal, Faulk claims that she is entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor made improper remarks during his rebuttal closing argument. Because our review of the record reveals that any such prosecutorial misconduct did not “so infect[] the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process,” we find that this claim is without merit. United States v. Morsley , 64 F.3d 907, 913 (4th Cir. 1995) (citation omitted). Accordingly, we affirm Faulk’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 115 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-72, CP2024-74.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26813 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K - YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                       167
<INVENTORY>                                      7,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,839
<PP&E>                                          26,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,718
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,493
<SALES>                                         26,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,279
<CGS>                                           21,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    292
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Wise

17784

9/17/96

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded
April 30, 2004

23775

#### Hindman v. Microsoft Corp.

Affirmed
TGA before and after

T his information is confidential.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-2985

LT Case No. 1999-CF-037438-A

_____________________________

LAMAR JAY FULLMER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.

Samuel Bookhardt, III, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

LaMar J. Fullmer, East Palatka, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Bonnie Jean 

Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

October 3, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, SOUD, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Paul C. McDonnel, Chief Financial Officer of Arrowhead Research
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2009



/S/    PAUL C.
MCDONNELPaul C. McDonnelChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    577,000
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                          22,863,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               298,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       64,434,000
<PP&E>                                 34,847,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        177,651,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  69,345,000
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                               76,997,000
<OTHER-SE>                              5,613,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          177,651,000
<SALES>                                81,663,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       81,663,000
<CGS>                                  62,518,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          62,518,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       11,937,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,761,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         5,447,000
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,906,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,541,000
<DISCONTINUED>                           (182,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,177,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .17



</TABLE>