alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:           |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|August 22, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc. N. Teal              
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Dennis Lee KIRK and Carlis Lee Kirk, Jr., Appellants.

No. 9153.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 4, 1963.

Decided Nov. 6, 1963.

John A. Amick, Charleston, W. Va., for appellants.

Harry G. Camper, Jr., U. S. Atty. (Percy H. Brown, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before BELL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Lee Kirk, convicted of unlawfully selling distilled spirits, and Carlis Lee Kirk, Jr., convicted of unlawfully possessing distilled spirits, appealed on the ground that they were entrapped into committing the crime. We hold that their conviction should be affirmed.

The defense asserted during the trial of the case was that a co-defendant possessed and sold the spirits and that the defendants were innocent bystanders. At no time prior to sentencing did the defendants raise the question of entrapment. Without objection the Court charged the jury that the defense of entrapment was not available to the defendants.

After the defendants were sentenced they raised the issue of entrapment by motions for judgment of acquittal, a new trial and in arrest of judgment. The District Court overruled these motions. Their present counsel was retained after the defendants were sentenced.

Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure providing that “Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court” affords the defendants no help. The evidence shows they were not entrapped.

It is clear that the defendants were not innocent persons. They had a previous disposition to commit the crime for which each was indicted. Their brief reluctance to deal with the agents related to the price of the whiskey and the identity of the buyers. No innocence of the defendants impeded the transaction.

*494Under these circumstances the fact that the Government agents purchased liquor from the defendants and permitted the defendants to use the agents’ car to transport the liquor in order to effect the sale is insufficient to show entrapment. It is the predisposition of the defendants that distinguishes this case from Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413 (1932).

Judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Wong v. Frank

15641

5/14/98

Vacated & Remanded
Order entered September 21 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 01575

- CV

WILLIAM T. DICKSON, Appellant

V.

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND FELLERS SNIDER B LAKENSHIP BAILEY & TIPPENS, P.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 1 93rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC 12

- 02048



### O RDER

We GRANT a

ppellant William T. Dickson’s motion to extend time to file reply brief to

appellee BNSF Railway Company’s brief and ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk of the

Court September 16, 2015, filed as of the date of this order

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### Jack London Products, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Maurice A. M. Edkiss, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 21, 1959.

*Daniel H. Greenberg*for plaintiff.

*Benjamin Lebenbaum*for defendant.

Samuel M. Gold, J.

Motion to direct plaintiff’s attorney to accept the answer is granted.

*454On April 16,1959 service of summons was made on defendant. On May 6, 1959 service of answer was made by mail. Insufficient postage was placed on the envelope and on May 8, 1959 the mail was received by plaintiff’s attorney after payment of 4 cents postage due. On the same day plaintiff’s attorney returned the answer with a notice of rejection, stating that the same was not served within the time prescribed by section 263 of the Civil Practice Act. The case cited by plaintiff, in opposition to this motion, holds for the proposition that validity of service depends upon whether or not the papers actually came into the hands of the attorney for the adverse party. If such failure to put proper postage on the envelope does not in fact prevent the actual receipt of the papers, (the plaintiff’s attorney having paid the postage due) it is an immaterial defect and does not invalidate the service *(Appeal Print. Co.*v. *Sherman,*99 App. Div. 533). Time of mailing answer and not time of its receipt constitutes the service *(Jackson & Perkins*v. *Rose Fair,*278 App. Div. 890).

The service of the answer having been valid and timely, the plaintiff’s attorney is directed to accept same. Answer shall be served within 10 days after filing of this order and publication thereof.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10(s)

                    ANNUAL TOP MANAGEMENT CASH BONUS PROGRAM

         The Corporation maintains a cash bonus plan whereby the executive
officers are eligible to receive cash bonuses equal to a percentage of the
executive officer's base salary if certain corporate pretax profit objectives
are achieved. The executive officers selected each year to participate in the
cash bonus plan, as well as the performance targets on which the cash bonuses
are based and the amount of the cash bonuses are determined each year at the
discretion of the Chairman and the Board of Directors.

         Specifically, the Chairman recommends to the Board of Directors certain
executive officers who will participate in the plan each year. Such executive
officers who will participate in the plan as evidenced by written notice from
the Corporation. The amount of the actual cash bonus paid to the various
executive officers participating in the cash bonus plan is calculated based on
the attainment of the corporate pretax profit objectives set-at the commencement
of each fiscal year.

         The cash bonuses are normally paid within the sixty (60) days after the
end of the fiscal year.
#### Gary H. RICHMOND, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 4544.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Jan. 5, 1977.

For opinion, see 554 P.2d 1217.

ORDER

The court having examined the petition for rehearing heretofore filed by appellant, and being fully advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

Dated this 5th day of January, 1977.

BY THE COURT:

/s/RODNEY M. GUTHRIE, Chief Justice

Justices McCLINTOCIC and ROSE

concur in the denial of the rehearing on the basis that appellant has not shown any error in the proceedings or violation of his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution. However, they adhere to their position expressed in separate concurrences to the original opinion that it was improper for this court to deny appellant’s claims of violation of federally guaranteed constitutional rights on the basis only that there had been no denial of rights guaranteed by the Wyoming Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                               7,732
<SECURITIES>                                                            41
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        2,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           570
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         0
<PP&E>                                                               2,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       2,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      11,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    0
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          10,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        11,248
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     2,922
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     (549)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      2,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  2,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         2,292
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            0


</TABLE>
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:18 PM To: Hutson, Nick; Fellner, Christian; Culligan, Kevin Cc: Elman, Barry Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563: 111(b) RIA Attachments: SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO 12866_111(b) Ne w-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_7 _21_2015.docx



### Attached please find a summary of interagency comme nts under EO 12866 and 13563 on the updated version of 111(b) RIA and response to interagency comments.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any quest ions.

Nathan
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Foreign Soil Not Treated at the Port

of Entry

Last Modified: 

Print

Soil which cannot be treated at the port of entry may be authorized for movement to

a facility inspected by APHIS-PPQ in advance and authorized under a permit issued

by PPQ. Specific safeguard provisions are described in the permit and also in a

compliance agreement with the facility.

Untreated soil cannot, under any circumstances, be authorized for importation

unless the shipment is going to an APHIS-PPQ inspected facility under a valid permit.

Neither the port nor the Permit Unit is able to provide one-time or provisional

authorizations. A permit is mandatory.

For legal reasons, permits for movement to inspected facilities cannot be issued to

agents, third parties, or others who cannot be directly responsible for the soil. The

permittee must be the person directly responsible for the facility inspected to

receive the soil.

The responsibilities and liabilities associated with the permit cannot be transferred

to another person or facility unless the soil is transferred to another permit holder or

re-exported in accordance with specific PPQ instructions. In either case, the original

permittee must maintain clear records which describe the disposition of each

shipment or portion of a shipment which has been transferred or exported.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

About Veterinary Services

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS' Veterinary Services program protects and improves the health, quality, and

marketability of our Nation's animals, animal products, and veterinary biologics. Our

team includes veterinary medical officers, animal health technicians,

epidemiologists, statisticians, and many others in specialized fields.

We work from locations throughout the United States to:

Proactively prepare for and respond to animal health emergencies

Manage national programs to prevent, control, or eliminate animal diseases

Provide or facilitate animal disease testing services

Ensure pure, safe, potent, and effective veterinary biologics

Facilitate the safe trade of animals and animal products

Represent the United States in international animal health standard-setting

activities

Conduct surveillance, monitoring, risk analysis, and modeling to strengthen

animal health infrastructures

Provide training and information to a nationwide network of accredited

veterinarians, State and Federal officials, and other animal health partners who

are the first line of defense for animal and public health

In all, we take a One Health approach, knowing that the health of animals, people,

and the environment are linked. We collaborate with partners across multiple
disciplines—from local to global levels—to find the best health outcomes for all.

Veterinary Services At-a-Glance

Here's a snapshot of some of our accomplishments in 2022 (15.96 MB).

Continued to enforce an African swine fever (ASF) protection zone in Puerto

Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands to prevent the disease from spreading to these

locations or the U.S. mainland and assisted the Dominican Republic and Haiti in

their ASF eradication programs to help contain the disease

Monitored U.S. livestock health, including testing 23,783 samples for ASF and/or

classical swine fever (with all results negative), and conducting 3,515 foreign

animal disease investigations, of which 1,464 involved investigations of

vesicular diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease and 1,322 involved poultry

diseases

Invested $16.9 million in the National Animal Vaccine and Veterinary

Countermeasures Bank

Licensed 86 manufacturers and permit holders for 1,448 active product

licenses/permits for the control of 278 animal diseases

Initiated an emergency program to address nationwide detections of highly

pathogenic avian influenza

Endorsed 329,344 health certificates to facilitate safe animal and animal

product exports and approved 2,663 facilities to export U.S. animal products

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about Veterinary Services, sign up for email updates.

Subscribe

Need help from Veterinary Services?

Visit Our Animal Health Contacts Directory
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 455 

Expressing support for designation of the inaugural ‘‘Cruise Travel 

Professional Month’’ in October. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2015 

Mr. CURBELO of Florida (for himself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. WILSON

of Florida, and Ms. FRANKEL of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the inaugural ‘‘Cruise 

Travel Professional Month’’ in October. 

Whereas more than 10,000 travel agencies and 19,000 individual cruise travel professionals throughout the United 

States support a safe, secure, healthy, and sustainable 

cruise ship environment, and are dedicated to promoting 

an enriching cruise travel experience for all consumers; 

Whereas these agencies and professionals participate in ongoing professional development and training programs to 

build cruise industry knowledge; 

Whereas cruise travel professionals deliver value to consumers 

by providing advice on choosing the best cruise based on 

customers’ budget and interests, and taking the worry 

out of vacation planning by arranging all the details; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 455 IH 

Whereas 70 percent of United States cruisers use a cruise 

travel professional to plan and book cruise vacations; 

Whereas the United States is the number one source of 

cruise passengers, with 11,350,000 cruise passengers in 

2014; 

Whereas the cruise industry in the United States generated 

375,000 jobs across all 50 States in 2014; 

Whereas the cruise industry spent $21,000,000,000 directly 

with United States businesses and generated 

$46,000,000,000 in gross outputs due to spending of 

cruise lines and their crew and passengers, including indirect economic impacts in 2014; and 

Whereas October would be an appropriate month to designate 

as ‘‘Cruise Travel Professional Month’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of the inaugural 

3 ‘‘Cruise Travel Professional Month’’; 

4 (2) acknowledges the creativity and profes5 sionalism of the men and women of the Cruise Trav6 el Professional community; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe this month with appropriate ceremonies 

9 and activities. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen R. Morrey, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dayton Superior
Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

       The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ending
       December 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
       requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

Dated: December 10, 2003

                                /s/ Stephen R. Morrey
                                -------------------------
                                Stephen R. Morrey
                                President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       87
February 4, 1999

21596

#### Robinson Family Partners v. Manini

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Forest Industry of Indiana Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Black Walnut

Year
    2005

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds 
Commemorative Tree

*Juglans nigra*
(Black Walnut)

Planted by 
Senator Richard G. Lugar

To Honor the Forest Industry of Indiana

April 29, 2005 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**467 CA 10-02240**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

KENNETH J. WILLIAMS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLEE C. FETZNER, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

LATTIMORE ROAD SURGICENTER, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, JOHN D. MARQUARDT, M.D. AND LATTIMORE ORTHOPAEDICS, P.C., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

CARL L. FEINSTOCK, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, BUFFALO (ANN M. CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered April 13, 2010. The order and judgment, inter alia, dismissed the complaint upon a jury verdict.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
#### State v. Brown

21557

04/14/2000

Vacated & Remanded
#### State v. Smith

18645

10/08/96

Affirmed