alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.6

POWER OF ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT COMPANY, an Illinois corporation (herein referred
to as the Company), is required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008; and

WHEREAS, each of the below undersigned is a director of the Company.

NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Scott A. Cisel and/or Warner L. Baxter and/or Steven R. Sullivan and/or Martin J.
Lyons and/or Jerre E. Birdsong the true and lawful attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to affix the name of the undersigned to said Form 10-K and any amendments thereto, and, for the
performance of the same acts, each with power to appoint in their place and stead and as their substitute, one or more attorneys-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of revocation; hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact may do by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 13th day of February
2009:



|                             |  |  |  |                        |  | 
|---------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | 
|                             |  |  |  |                        |  | 
|                             |  |  | 
|Daniel F. Cole, Director     |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel F. Cole     |  | 
|                             |  |  | 
|Steven R. Sullivan, Director |  |  |  | /s/ Steven R. Sullivan |  | 
|                             |  |  |  |                        |  | 





|                  |  |   |  |     |  | 
|----------------- |  | - |  | --- |  | 
|STATE OF MISSOURI |  | ) |  |     |  | 
|                  |  | ) |  | SS. |  | 
|CITY OF ST. LOUIS |  | ) |  |     |  | 

On this 13th day of February, 2009, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared the above-named directors of Central Illinois Light Company, known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing power of attorney and acknowledged to me that they executed the same as their free act
and deed for the purposes therein stated.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal.



/s/ Carolyn J. ShannonCAROLYN J. SHANNON Notary Public  Notary Seal STATE OF MISSOURI  ST. LOUIS COUNTY Commission #08383284 My Commission Expires
03/02/2012
# C_2020378EN.01002701.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Société générale v ECB

(Case T-143/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments - Tasks entrusted to the ECB - Specific supervision powers of the ECB - Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital - Absence of individual examination)

(2020/C 378/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société générale (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou, R. Bax and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment, first, of ECB Decision ECB/SSM/2017-O2RNE8IBXP4R0TD8PU41/174 of 19 December 2017, and, second, of ECB Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRSOG-10 of 14 February 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls paragraph 5 of Decision ECB/SSM/2017-O2RNE8IBXP4R0TD8PU41/174 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 19 December 2017 and Article 3 of Annex A thereto and paragraph 5 of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRSOG-10 of the ECB of 14 February 2019 and Article 3 of the annex thereto to the extent that Société génerale is concerned; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls paragraph 5 of Decision ECB/SSM/2017-O2RNE8IBXP4R0TD8PU41/174 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 19 December 2017 and Article 3 of Annex A thereto and paragraph 5 of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRSOG-10 of the ECB of 14 February 2019 and Article 3 of the annex thereto to the extent that Société génerale is concerned;

| 2. | Orders the ECB is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
EXHIBIT 21  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT PARENT First Financial Service Corporation  SUBSIDIARIES

          

          State of Incorporation

          

          Percentage OwnedFirst Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown

          

          Kentucky

          

          100%First Service Corporation of Elizabethtown(a)

          

          Kentucky

          

          100%First Federal Office Park, LLC(a)

          

          Kentucky

          

          100%Heritage Properties, LLC(a)

          

          Kentucky

          

          100%First Federal Statutory Trust II(a)

          

          Kentucky

          

          100%First Federal Statutory Trust III(a)

          

          Kentucky

          

          100%
  (a)

          Wholly-owned subsidiaries of First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown.
#### State v. Dias

23607

03/14/2002

Vacated and Remanded
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 21
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                             Percentage                State of 
Subsidiaries (1)                                               Owned                Incorporation
----------------                                             ----------             -------------   

<S>                                                             <C>                 <C> 
Ameriana Savings Bank, F.S.B. (2)                               100%                United States
                                                                   
Deer Park Federal Savings and Loan Association (2)              100%                United States
                                                                   
Indiana Title Insurance Company (2)                             100%                Indiana
                                                                   
Ameriana Financial Services, Inc. (3)                           100%                Indiana
                                                                   
Ameriana Insurance Agency, Inc. (4)                             100%                Indiana
                                                                   
Family Financial Life (5)                                        19%                Louisiana
                                                                   
Deer Park Service Corporation (6)                               100%                Ohio
</TABLE> 

--------------
(1)    Operations of the Company's wholly-owned direct subsidiaries, the Bank,
       the Association and Indiana Title, and the Bank's wholly-owned
       subsidiary, AFS, are included in the Company's consolidated financial
       statements attached as an exhibit to the Annual Report.
(2)    First-tier subsidiary of the Company.
(3)    Second-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Bank, a first-
       tier subsidiary of the Company.
(4)    Third-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by AFS, a second-tier
       subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Bank, a first-tier subsidiary
       of the Company.
(5)    Third-tier subsidiary of the Company 1/10 owned through stock investment
       and less than 1/10 owned through partnership interests of AFS, a second-
       tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Bank, a first-tier
       subsidiary of the Company.
(6)    Second-tier subsidiary of the Company 100% owned by the Association, a
       first-tier subsidiary of the Company.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Second Amendment dated _______________ amends the terms of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated as of _______________, as first amended effective ___________, by and between The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) and _______________ (“Executive”). 

For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Company and Executive hereby agree as follows: 

The last sentence of Section 7.2 of the Agreement is deleted, and replaced by the following: 

“Cause” shall mean any of the following: (1) the conviction of the Executive (including a plea or nolo contendere) of a felony or gross
misdemeanor under federal or state law in the US or under the laws of any country where the Company has operations, which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or which impairs the Executive’s ability to perform substantially
the Executive’s duties; or (2) Executive knowingly engaging in an act or omission that materially violates a Company policy or other applicable written standard of conduct or performance, or is a material breach of fiduciary duty to the
Company or any of its affiliates; or (3) Executive refusing to abide by a reasonable and lawful directive following written notice and reasonable opportunity to do so. 
  

			
	THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.	  	EXECUTIVE
		
	By:
                                         
                               	  	By:
                                         
                               
		
	Title:
                                         
                            	  	Name:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-59334, 333-49262, 333-92129, 333-69923 and 33-12445 of ACTV, Inc. on Form
S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-58486, 333-54038, 333-91603, 333-06623
and 33-63181 of ACTV, Inc on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2003 (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ACTV, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York


March 28, 2003
July 7, 2005

25974

#### U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n v. Ragasa

Affirmed
Linking Documents Within the LSRTIS Mail Log System

ICWI0074.01 Page 1 of 1

Issuing Authority: Jeanette M. Watson

Issue Date: 01Sep16

Source Document and Issue Date or Edition: ICSOP0045, Inspection and Compliance Correspondence (LSRTIS, 

Mail Log Procedures)

Background

Documents that are housed electronically in the Mail Log system will not need to be printed out;

however, there is a mechanism linking documents that are related. Think of linking as stapling 

documents together or placing them in the same folder. 

Linking Documents

There are two types of linking available in the Mail Log: Functional Linking and Informational 

Linking. 

A. Functional Linking

1. Two incoming documents have been received, but only one outgoing correspondence 

is required. 

Example: A request for a process deviation is submitted. The Specialist verbally 

requests more information prior to a decision. The second submission will be 

FUNCTIONALLY linked to the initial request and there will be only one

outgoing correspondence for the two incoming submissions.

2. This happens prior to closing the Mail Item (RM).

3. The documents being functionally linked must be in the same Activity within the Mail 

Log; for example, both must be in Review (Specialist).

4. The Lowest Number is the Parent Document.

5. Outgoing documents must be attached to the Parent Document.

a. The highest Mail Log number will be sent back to the firm with the statement 

“See ML xxx for CVB response to this Submission”.

b. Note: Outgoing correspondence erroneously attached to the Sibling

record will be released back through the Portal to the firm.

6. Actions are taken on the Parent Document – Child Documents will not have the Move 

Forward function.

B. Informational Linking (more common use)

1. One incoming document may have many related submissions and outgoing responses.

Example: Firm responses to an inspection may be INFORMATIONALLY linked 

to the Inspection Report. 

2. This can be done on either Active or Completed Mail Log Items.

3. Typically done by the Specialist, but can be done by the BCA under Review (BCA).

C. Procedure:

1. Open the Mail Log item that you will be working on (the lowest numbered item for 

Functionally Linked Mail Log Items).

2. Click on the Edit Mail Item link.

3. Within the Info Tab, click on the “Link Mail Item” link.

4. In the Related Mail Item Number, enter the Mail Log item that you want to be linked.

5. For Functionally linked items – Click on Save Sibling.

6. For Informationally linked items – Click in the box for “Informational Linkage?”, 

then choose Save Sibling.
# C_2020103EN.01002202.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kande Mupompa v Council

(Case T-170/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Right to respect for private and family life - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality - Modification of the form of order sought)

(2020/C 103/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Alex Kande Mupompa (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, S. Lejeune and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/569 of 12 April 2018 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 95, p. 21), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/566 of 12 April 2018 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 95, p. 9), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Alex Kande Mupompa to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Alex Kande Mupompa to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.

---
26337

#### State v. Praino

Reversed
No. 07-14-00385-CR

Monita Mechelle Smith

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 181st District Court of

 Randall County

February 4, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated February 4, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
#### Raymond RODRIGUEZ-DE LEON, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 18773.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 14, 1963.

*312David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief of Civil Section, and Jacqueline L. Weiss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of deportation. He did not, however, exhaust his administrative remedies by appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under these circumstances, his petition must be dismissed. Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139; Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141. Section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 1009(c)) is of no help to petitioner. It applies “except as otherwise expressly required by statute.” Here the statute, section 106(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c)) does otherwise expressly require.

Dismissed.
19028

#### State v. Poti

January 30, 1997

Order No. 97-8

Vacated
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 668 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that philanthropy is 

an integral partner to government with a unique and proven ability 

to foster innovation, strengthen civil society, and build thriving communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. TIBERI (for himself and Mr. LEWIS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

philanthropy is an integral partner to government with 

a unique and proven ability to foster innovation, 

strengthen civil society, and build thriving communities. 

Whereas philanthropy embodies a longstanding United States 

value of charitable giving and empowers donors from all 

walks of life to use a variety of giving tools to serve their 

communities both today and tomorrow; 

Whereas charitable giving is driven by United States generosity but also reliant upon the enabling environment 

fostered by incentives in the tax code; 

Whereas foundations spur innovation and drive progress in 

our communities in education, healthcare, the arts, ecoVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:50 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR668.IH HR668

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 668 IH 

nomic and rural development, and countless other social 

issues; 

Whereas foundations, while not a replacement for government 

services, leverage private resources and provide vital risk 

capital and expertise to respond to immediate needs like 

natural disasters, and build resources over time to address long-term issues like education and job creation; 

Whereas philanthropy enriches the Nation’s civil society 

through a deep connection to the needs of communities, 

and as such, is an essential partner in policymaking; and 

Whereas the Nation benefits from collaboration between government and the philanthropic sector, and together, we 

can work to solve pressing social problems, better serve 

our common constituents, and produce thriving United 

States communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that philanthropy is a dynamic force for inno3 vation, strategic thinking, and leadership that advances 

4 the common good. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Commission File Nos. 33-45021 333-63109 and 33-72101 pertaining to
the RSI Holdings, Inc. Stock Option Plan, as amended, and (2) the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File No. 333-104675) pertaining to the RSI
Holdings, Inc. Amended 2002 Stock Option Plan of our report dated October 21,
2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of RSI Holdings,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31,
2004.





                                             /s/  Elliott Davis, LLC



November 24, 2004
Greenville, South Carolina
**Annex 5. Item 7.2. – Articles 9.4.1. and 9.4.2. of Chapter 9.4. Infection with IHHNV**

CHAPTER 9.4. INFECTION WITH INFECTIOUS HYPODERMAL AND HAEMATOPOIETIC NECROSIS VIRUS 

Article 9.4.1.

For the purposes of the *Aquatic Code*, infection with infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis virus means *infection*with the *pathogenic agent Decapod ~~penstyldensovirus~~penstylhamaparvovirus*1, ~~commonly known as infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV),~~of the Genus *~~Penstyldensovirus~~Penstylhamaparvovirus*and Family *Parvoviridae*.

Information on methods for *diagnosis*is provided in the *Aquatic Manual*.

Article 9.4.2.

Scope

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.: blue shrimp (*Penaeus stylirostris*), giant tiger prawn (*Penaeus monodon*)*,*northern white shrimp (*Penaeus setiferus*)*,***~~yellowleg shrimp (*Penaeus californiensis*),~~~~giant tiger prawn *(Penaeus monodon)*~~, ~~northern white shrimp *(Penaeus setiferus)*~~, ~~blue shrimp*(Penaeus stylirostris)*~~**~~and~~ whiteleg shrimp (*Penaeus vannamei*) and yellowleg shrimp (*Penaeus californiensis*).

[...]

___________________________
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
State of Connecticut Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    White Oak

Year
    1993

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Quercus alba*
(White Oak - The Charter Oak)

To Commemorate the State of Connecticut

Sponsored by
Rep. Gary A. Franks

Dedicated November 17, 1993
Replanted November 2007
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    Photo of plaque.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          Photo of plaque. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe