alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-021

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

Semi-Aquatic Animals

AQUATIC AREAS

In the wild, semi-aquatic animals will 

spend time with their entire bodies 

in the water. Water temperature is 

important because animals may not use 

their pools if the water is too warm or 

too cold compared to what they would 

experience in the wild. 

In captive environments, they need 

access to pools that are large enough 

and deep enough for each animal to 

fully submerge. Another good feature is 

a gradual or sloped, non-slip entry to the pool. This 

gives animals an easy and comfortable way to enter 

and exit the pool. It also offers a place for shallow 

water behaviors like washing food.

PRACTICAL TIP

Semi-aquatic 

animals often 

defecate and urinate 

in the water. Pools for 

these species need a 

maintenance system 

(filtration, regular 

replacement of the 

water, etc.) to make 

sure the water quality 

does not cause a 

health problem.

Beavers, capybaras, hippopotamuses, river 

otters, tapirs, and other semi-aquatic animals 

naturally spend part of their time in water and 

part on land. Having both aquatic and dry 

areas in the main enclosure for these animals 

is important to support their natural behaviors.

NATURAL 

BEHAVIORS 

Understanding the natural behavior of semiaquatic animals in your care will help you decide 

how much space is enough for both dry and 

aquatic areas. Consider especially what each 

type of semi-aquatic animal would be doing 

in the wild and how to design an enclosure for 

these activities. 

For example, hippopotamuses spend most of 

their time in the water during daylight hours, 

often submerging completely for long periods 

of time and walking underwater. At night, they 

leave the water to graze. A proper enclosure 

design would have dry and aquatic areas large 

enough to support all of these natural behaviors.

DRY AREAS

Along with their pool areas, semiaquatic animals need sufficient 

dry land for their comfort and to 

support natural behaviors. 

For example, some 

species need dry 

land for foraging or 

grazing while others 

need it for rest.
# C_2018436EN.01003003.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 4 October 2018 — AR v Cooper International Spirits LLC, Établissements Gabriel Boudier SA, St Dalfour SAS

(Case C-622/18)

(2018/C 436/43)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AR

Defendants: Cooper International Spirits LLC, Établissements Gabriel Boudier SA, St Dalfour SAS

Question referred

Must Article 5(1)(b) and Articles 10 and 12 of Directive 2008/95 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (1) be interpreted as meaning that a proprietor which has never exploited its trade mark and whose rights over it were revoked on expiry of the period of five years following publication of its registration can obtain compensation for injury caused by infringement, claiming an adverse effect on the essential function of its trade mark, caused by use by a third party, before the effective date of the revocation, of a sign similar to that trade mark to designate goods or services identical or similar to those for which that trade mark was registered?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25.

---
27445

#### State v. Keliikoa

Affirmed
Item_5_1_12_MERS-CoV/ page 1

Annex 17

CHAPTER X.X.INFECTION WITH MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS

Article X.X.1.

General provisions

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a viral respiratory infection of humans and dromedary camels (*Camelus dromedarius*) which is caused by a coronavirus called Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV).

Dromedary camels ~~(*Camelus dromedarius*)**have been confirmed by several studies to be~~are the natural host and zoonotic source of the MERS-CoV infection in humans. Other species may be susceptible to *infection* with MERS-CoV. However, their epidemiological significance has not been demonstrated.

MERS-CoV has been associated with mild upper respiratory signs in some dromedary camels. While the impact of MERS-CoV on animal health is very low, ~~human infections have a significant public health impact~~it causes severe disease in humans.

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, MERS is defined as an *infection* of dromedary camels with MERS-CoV.

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with MERS-CoV:

1)	MERS-CoV has been isolated and identified as such in a sample from a dromedary camel;~~,~~ or

2)ribonucleic acid specific to MERS-CoV has been ~~identified~~detected in a sample~~s~~ from a dromedary camel showing clinical signs or pathological lesions suggestive of MERS~~-CoV~~ or epidemiologically linked to a ~~suspected or~~confirmed or suspected *case*~~of MERS-CoV~~, or from a dromedary camel giving cause for suspicion of previous association or contact with MERS-CoV.

Standards for diagnostic tests are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*. 

___________________________

*OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2021*

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*1
EXHIBIT 11

MARATHON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Computation of Weighted Average Shares Outstanding and Earnings Per Share

                         Shares Outstanding End of Month

                                                    1996               1995
                                               -------------      ---------

   January                                         1 306 303          1 078 601
   February                                        1 306 303          1 078 601
   March                                           1 306 303          1 078 601
   April                                           1 306 303          1 078 601
   May                                             1 306 303          1 078 601
   June                                            1 306 303          1 294 334
   July                                            1 306 303          1 294 334
   August                                          1 306 303          1 294 334
   September                                       1 306 303          1 294 334
   October                                         1 863 495          1 294 334
   November                                        1 863 495          1 294 334
   December                                        1 863 495          1 306 303
                                               -------------      -------------
                                                  17 347 212         14 465 312
                  Divided by                       12 months          12 months
                                               -------------      -------------

        Weighted Shares Outstanding                1 445 601          1 205 443
                                               =============      =============

        Net Income                             $     839 421      $     420 541
                                               =============      =============

        Net Income Per Share                   $         .58      $         .35
                                               =============      =============
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

U.S. State and Territory Animal Entry

Requirements

Last Modified: 

Print

U.S. State and Territory entry requirements for live animals are written and

maintained by each receiving State or Territory.

Find U.S. State and Territory Requirements

National Association of State Departments of Agriculture

Visit the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture to find your

destination's agriculture department and check its website for requirements.

Moving pets within the States or Territories? See our page on taking a pet from one

U.S. State or Territory to another.

Questions?

For questions or clarification on any of the requirements, contact the State or

Territorial veterinarian's office.
23711

#### State v. Street

Vacated and Remanded
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVON D. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 144 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Torn Sieger, Director

Bureau of Environmenta] & Occupational Health

State of Wisconsin Department of Health

&Fanilly Services V

1 West Wilson Street, Room 137

Madison, WI 53703 V

V

Dear Mr. Sieger:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency. Region 5, Pesticidesand Toxics

Branch approved the Quality Management Plan (QMP) for the Wisconsin Department of

Health & Family Services’ Lead-Based Paint Activities Program on October 6, 2005.

This QMP approval isapplicable only to the above mentioned program aud will cease in

five years. The QMP document must b. reviewed at least annually or at some other mutually

agreeable interval to reflect any updates or new rules/program activities. The orginai QMP

signaturepage is included for your records.

Thank you for the positive efforts put forth in completion of the QMP. Please feel free to

discuss any issues related td this program with Marlyse Wiebenga, Project Officer at

(312) 886-4437, or with Larisa Leonova, QA Coordinator at (312) 353-5838.

Waste, Pesticides and Toxics Division

Enclosure

Sincerely,

RecycledlRecyclable. Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (50%Postconsumer)
Quality Management Plan

for

Environmental Lead Data for Lead-Based Paint Activities

For the State:

Tom Sieger, Director

Bureau of Environmental & Occupational Health

I

•&L

Shelley Bruce,upervisor, Asbestos and Lead Section

For EPA Region 5:

joDirec tor,

Waste Pesticides and Toxics Division, Region 5

Larisa Leonova, QA Mtger, P

Waste, Pesticides and Toxics Division, Region 5

-

/O///t

Dte

Date

Dthe

io//cs

bate

jo4/c3

,Toxics Program Section, ate

Waste, ion, Region 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      20,569,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,210,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,780,173
<PP&E>                                     112,186,897
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,191,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,776,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,042,810
<BONDS>                                     45,991,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,741,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,776,345
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,960,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,457,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,854,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,648,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,648,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,648,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Francis Basile, Respondent.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred H. Kleiman, J.), entered February 2, 1990, granting defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a continued *Mapp*hearing.

On August 2, 1989, at approximately 3:20 p.m., Police Officer Mooney of the Tactical Narcotics Team observed defendant conversing with a man in the doorway of 512 West 162nd Street. From a distance of about one hundred feet, Officer Mooney saw defendant hand money to the other man and receive something in exchange. Defendant then walked past Officer Mooney; he was looking at a plastic bag containing white powder. The officer radioed a description of defendant and his direction of travel to his field team. Defendant entered a car and was followed by the backup team, which eventually stopped the car at 165th Street and Riverside Drive and arrested and searched defendant. A plastic bag containing cocaine was recovered from defendant’s boot.

At the suppression hearing, cross-examination of the two *473testifying police officers was delayed inasmuch as they failed to bring all their *Rosario*material with them. After both had completed their direct examination, the Justice presiding asked, "Aside from cross-examination, that’s the People’s case?” When the prosecutor answered, "yes”, the court assumed that the defense had rested and granted defendant’s motion to suppress, concluding that "[t]here is no evidence before this Court based on any experience whatsoever that this officer had any reason to believe this was in fact cocaine” and that, since defendant was never questioned, his arrest was based on mere suspicion. We reverse and remand for a continuation of the hearing.

Probable cause does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt but rather "merely information which would lead a reasonable person who possesses the same expertise as the officer to conclude, under the circumstances, that a crime is being or was committed”. *(People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594, 602.) Here, Officer Mooney testified that he saw defendant give another man money and receive in exchange something that the officer identified immediately thereafter as a plastic bag containing white powder. This is precisely the type of observation that the *McRay*court found to be sufficient indicia of a drug sale, irrespective of the observing officer’s experience, to warrant an arrest. *(Supra,*at 604.) Indeed, that a drug sale had probably taken place here would have been obvious to any civilian. Moreover, since Officer Mooney had probable cause to arrest defendant, the backup officers could make the arrest based on Mooney’s radio transmission. *(See, e.g., People v Lypka,*36 NY2d 210.) Since the People submitted sufficient proof on the probable cause issue, the suppression order is reversed and the matter remanded for a continuation of the hearing. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ross and Smith, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7305 ROBERT LEE BROCK, Petitioner - Appellant, versusEDDIE PEARSON; WARDEN, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Respondents - Appellees, and RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER; THOMAS WOODS; RAYMOND ROBERTSON, Respondents.

No. 95-7671 ROBERT LEE BROCK, Petitioner - Appellant, versusEDDIE PEARSON; WARDEN, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Respondents - Appellees,2 and RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER; THOMAS WOODS; RAYMOND ROBERTSON, Respondents. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-247-R, CA-95-326-R) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Rita Marie Sampson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988). 2 The magistrate judge found the reconsideration motion untimely. We find that it was meritless and affirm the order denying it on that basis. 3 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's orders1 denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition and denying reconsideration. 2 We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Brock v. Pearson , Nos. CA-95-247-R; CA-95-326-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 16, 1995; Sept. 15, 1995). We deny Brock's motions for immediate relief, to remand, and for deconsolidation. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
WHAT TO LOOK FOR

• Lopsided, bitter, hard 

fruit with small, dark 

aborted seeds

• Fruit that remains green 

even when ripe

• Asymmetrical blotchy 

mottling of leaves

• Yellow shoots

• Twig dieback 

• Stunted, sparsely foliated 

trees that may bloom 

o season

• Visible Asian citrus 

psyllids or their waxy 

secretions

CITRUS

GREENING

(ALSO CALLED HUANGLONGBING)

Green color even on ripe fruit

Aborted seeds

Mottled leaves

LEAVES AND FRUIT 

AFFECTED BY DISEASE
THEHARM IT CAUSES

Citrus greening (also called Huanglongbing, HLB) is 

one of the most serious citrus plant diseases in the 

world. Once a tree is infected, there is no cure. While 

the disease poses no threat to humans or animals, 

it has devastated millions of acres of citrus crops 

throughout the United States and abroad. Citrus 

greening is spread by a disease-infected insect, the 

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), and has put the future of 

America’s citrus at risk. Infected trees produce fruits 

that are green, misshapen, and bitter—unsuitable for 

sale as fresh fruit or for juice. Most infected trees die 

within a few years. 

WHAT YOU CAN DO • Do not move homegrown citrus fruit or plants across 

State lines.

• Only buy citrus fruit or trees from shippers who 

comply with Federal quarantine restrictions. 

Ask vendors whether their products are in compliance 

with Federal quarantines.

• Allow authorized agricultural workers access 

to your property to inspect for the ACP. 

• Report any sightings of this pest at HungryPests.com.

For more information visit: 

HUNGRYPESTS.COM

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

 Program Aid No. 2125-CG Issued September 2012
Phantom 2 Vision + Mission Checklists

Arrival Checklist

1. If day and operating out of back of vehicle, point vehicle into sun

2. Remove case and place on level surface

3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or controlled airspace using smartphone or tablet app

4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver, to contact tower of field if closer than 5 NM

5. Inform tower / CTAF of UAS ops, location, and max height of flight

Preflight Checklist

1. Remove transmitter

2. Router - On

3. Transmitter - On

4. Toggle Switches - Full Up

5. Video Monitor - On

6. Remove UAS from case

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed

8. Micro-SD card - Inserted

9. UAS Battery - Inserted

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and recovery position if it returns to home

11. UAS Battery - On

12. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

13. DJI Application - Load

14. DJI application - Connect to Camera

15. Camera - Full Up

16. Satellite Connections - Verified

17. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight

18. Video Recording - Start

19. Takeoff

After Takeoff Checklist

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the ground to confirm UAS is under control

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover - Verified

Pre-Landing Checklist

1. Camera - Full Up

2. Video Recorder - Stop

3. Landing Zone – Clear / Safe

Post-Landing Checklist - Returning to Flight Immediately

1. Battery - Remove & Replace

2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera

4. Takeoff

End of Ops Checklist

1. Battery - Off

2. Transmitter - Off

3. Router - Off

4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
January 30, 1998

19716

#### State v. Demarco

Affirmed
U.S. 

### Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington,DC 20590
Mr. Mark W. Atwood Cozen O'Connor 1627 I St. NW, Ste. 1100 Washington, D.C. 20006 Issue date: October 16, 2014 Authority expires: December 2, 2014



### NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY Kalitta Air, L.L.C. is a properly certificated carrierthat holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply withthe applicable Departmentregulations andthe provisions ofthe 2014-2015 U.S.-China Protocol. 

### Number ofFlights: five (5) one-way charters 1 

### Flight Date(s): November 1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23, and 29-30, 2014 

### Points: Shanghai (PVG)- Anchorage (ANC*)

- Chicago (ORD) 

### Equipment: Boeing 747-400 The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air CarrierLicensing Division (X-44), Office ofInternational Aviation, Department ofTransportation, on its operation for the preceding monthby the tenth ofeach month whether the flights operated. This notice is valid only for the flight contained inthe above program. * Denotes technical stop only. An electronic version of this documentis available on the World Wide Web at: www.regulations.gov

1Following our grant ofKalittaAir L.L.C.'s request for five (5) one-way charter allocation, 46 one-way charter allocations remain available in the Zone 1 charter pool for the 2014/15 charter year.