alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                             PLACE OF INCORPORATION
-----------------------------------------------                ----------------------
<S>                                                            <C>
AMTROL Canada Ltd.                                             Ontario, Canada

Water Soft Inc.                                                Rhode Island

AMTROL International Investments Inc.                          Rhode Island

AMTROL Europe Ltd.                                             United Kingdom

AMTROL Holdings Netherlands B.V.                               Netherlands

AMTROL Poland Sp z.o.o.                                        Swarzedz, Poland

AMTROL Holdings Portugal, SGPS, Unipessoal, Lda.               Guimaraes, Portugal

AMTROL-ALFA Metalomecanica, S.A.                               Guimaraes, Portugal

AMTROL Asia Pacific Ltd.                                       Hong Kong
</TABLE>
# C_2019065EN.01002003.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/20

---

Appeal brought on 21 June 2018 by Senetic S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 24 April 2018 in Case T-208/17: Senetic v EUIPO

(Case C-409/18 P)

(2019/C 65/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Senetic S.A. (represented by: M. Krekora, adwokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, HP Hewlett Packard Group LLC

By order of 13 December 2018 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
September 24, 2004

25270

#### State v. Moore

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Senator Byrd Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    White Oak

Year
    1997

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds 
Memorial Tree

*Quercus alba*
(White Oak)

Sponsored by 
Sen. Tom Daschle

To Honor Sen. Robert C. Byrd 
on His Eightieth Birthday

November 25, 1997
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.

The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
    The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
      The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Senator Byrd tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
16848

#### Salcedo v. Pony Taxi

January 29, 1997

Order No. 97-7

Affirmed
Asian Pacific American Chamber ofCommerce 


Peter Wong 

Chairman 

Ron Shahani 

Vice Chairman 

Suk-KyuKoh 

President 

Grace Lee 

Vice PresidentlTreasurer 

Peter Schreck 

Secretary 

Wallace K. Tsuha, Jr. 

Chairman Emeritus 

Directors: 

B.N. Bahadur 


Stephanie Beau 


Amat Berry-Brown 


Bing Goei 


Jimmy Hsiao 


Jamie Hsu, Ph.D. 


R.I. King 


Peng-Li Liu 


Janny Lu 


Ernestina Mac, M.D. 


Victor Naidu 


Dominic Pangborn 


Brenda Schneider 


Shigeki Terashi 


Executive Director 

Denise Vee Grim 

2009 Corporate Sponsors 

• ·DTE Energy 

• Nippon Oil 

• Toyota Motor Engineering & 

Manufacturing NA, Inc. 

• Comerica Bank 

• Ford Motor Company 

• General Motors Company 

• SaturnElectronics & 

Engineering, Inc. 

• Darden Restaurants 

• Delphi Corporation 

• Delta Air Lines 

• Dow Automotive Systems 

• Visteon Corporation 

February 26, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Oil behalf ofAPACC .. Asian Pacific American Chamber of Commerce, I 

am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air 

Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, 

where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with 

Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and 

hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's 

market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created demand for 

increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the 

convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is aproven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that 

can support trans~pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service 

to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to Detroit 

Metro Airport to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition of 

Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our 

business travelers. 

APACC's mission is to facilitate business relationships among Asian and 

U.S. companies and to promote entrepreneurship for the advancement of 

Asian Pacific Americans. APACC is committed to serve as a catalyst for 

expanding business opportunities for companies that desire to connect 

with Asian Pacific American businesses and the global Asian consumer 

markets . 

Thank you for consideration of this request. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Wong, CPA 

APACC Chairman ofthe Board 

Cc: Susy Heintz Avery, Wayne County Airport Authority 

2120 Austin Avenue, Rochester Hills, MI48326 Phone (248) 8444100 Fax (248) 844-4280 www.apacc.net
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF WINDSOR PARK PROPERTIES 7 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         511,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  653,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,646,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,933,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,062,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      7,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,572,200<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,062,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,728,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,024,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               691,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             658,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                353,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            353,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   353,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.21<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Limited and general partners equity.
<F2>Net income per limited partnership unit.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
19740

#### Doe, In re (b. 3/1/82)

Affirmed
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

AC-20-003 • Issued May 2020

The most important step is having observant 

staff who can recognize individual animals and 

monitor each animal’s food intake. Being attentive 

to guest behavior to make sure they are following 

your rules for public feeding is also essential. 

THE RIGHT FOODS

Many species require special diets and 

feeding them other foods may not be 

good for their health. Be clear about what your

public feeding program allows.

Strategies for an 

effective program:

l Setting clear policies for those who 

violate the feeding rules

l Posting signs

l Offering keeper talks and other public outreach

DRIVE-THROUGH ANIMAL PARKS

Public feeding of animals in drive-through parks can bring even 

more challenges. Here are some added tips for these situations: 

l Offer verbal or written instructions, such as a flyer, at the point of entry to make 

visitors aware they can only feed the animals facility-provided food.

l Encourage visitors to only offer food in 

a way that the animals’ heads or other 

body parts do not enter vehicles.

l Have methods in place for staff 

to observe visitors often enough 

throughout the drive to intervene if 

there are problems.

Public Feeding of Animals in 

Petting Zoos and Other Settings

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about managing animals housed at drive-through parks. 

When visitors are allowed to feed exhibit animals, 

it’s up to you to keep the public safe and make sure your 

animals are getting the right amounts of the right foods.

THE RIGHT AMOUNTS

Some animals 

may be better 

at attracting 

attention from 

people than 

others, so it’s 

important to 

make sure food is distributed 

evenly among the animals. 

Tools and approaches 

that can help include:

l Individual animal feed records with 

photo IDs of each animal

l Photos or diagrams of the various species 

that define optimal body condition so staff 

have a quick visual comparison when 

monitoring animal weight

l Weighing animals regularly

l Having ways to exclude the more 

food-aggressive animals when needed, 

such as using dividers or smaller pens 

during feeding times, or providing 

separate feed stations

PRACTICAL TIP

If public 

feeding of animals 

is not allowed at 

your facility, remind 

guests verbally and 

through signage.
#### State v. Forman

23383

08/21/2001

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT31.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark R. Tauscher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC SystemsInc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) [Not Applicable];

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Date: August 13, 2007 |   | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 8, 2007

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer













CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 8, 2007

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
--------------------------------------------
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.1


 


[logo]


GOVERNO
DO ESTADO DE RONDÔNIA


Superintendência
Estadual de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Infraestrutura - SEDI


 


Ofício
no 755/2018/SEDI-GAB


 


May 25th,
2018


Pacific
Software Inc.


34145
Pacific Coast Highway


Dana
Point, CA 92629


 


Attn:
Mr. Peter J. Pizzino - President & Dr. Wang-Chan Wong - Technical Advisor


 


Subject
: Letter of Interest of Traded Brazilian Delegation to China and Trade Platform Technology.


 


On
behalf of the Government of the Rondônia, we are pleased to participate in a possible visit to China to discuss Trade Relations
between Brazilian exporters and Chinese importers with emphasis on Agricultural Products, such as Beef, Pork, Soy Beans, and more.
We understand that Pacific Software Inc. ́s team will help organize, with local partners and agencies there, to coordinate
the acceptable dates, city and agenda in the near future.


 


In
addition, we would like to discuss further the Trade Platform with E-Commerce Technology your team has proposed to help better
promote and transact trade to China. We would like to complete this assessment with our other regional leaders and representatives
on a video conference call, before your upcoming visit.


 


We look
forward to further discussion and planning for your visit.


 


Yours
Respectfully


 


BASILIO
LEANDRO DE OLIVEIRA


Superintendent
of Development


 


Referência:
Caso responda este Ofício, indicar expressamente o Processo no 0041.177524/2018-49 SEI no 2023922
#### Adamina Vasquez, an Infant by Her Guardian ad Litem, Paula Hernandez, et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*East River Day Camp, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 8, 1959.

*386*Be LuJcey & Shapiro*for plaintiffs.

*Robinson & Gales*for defendant.

Aron Steuer, J.

Motion to examine defendant in order to frame a complaint. The affidavits show that defendant operates a day *camp;*that the infant plaintiff, a child eight years of age, fell while in the custody of defendant’s servants and that the child does not know the location of the place where she fell. There is no claim that the child is ignorant of the manner in which she fell and the other circumstances. These would be sufficient to frame a complaint.

Plaintiff also alleges that defendant is under a duty to disclose the facts because plaintiff makes out a prima facie case by showing delivery to defendant in a sound condition and return in a damaged condition. If this theory based on apparent similarity of legal relationship of a child to merchandise entrusted to a bailee could be considered sound it would be even simpler to draw a complaint.

The real reason for this application is that plaintiff’s attorney suspects that there may be a cause of action against the city and wants the information to start such an action. The purpose may be legitimate but there is no provision in our law for examing a defendant in order to get information which may result in a cause of action against a third party.

Motion denied.