alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anthony Kertatos et al., Appellants, *v.*Vincent A. Ferreri et al., Defendants. Paige & Berg, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

February 10, 1969.

*Harry Rosenberg*for appellants.

*Paige $ Berg (Irving M. Berg*of counsel), respondents in person.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from the original order should be dismissed, without costs in view of the appeal from the order on reargument. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 562-a; *Edell*v. *Edell,*279 App. Div. 657.) Order granting reargument and adhering to the original determination should be unanimously modified so as to provide that plaintiffs’ motion to substitute their attorneys unconditionally is granted and that the amount found to be the reasonable value of the services rendered shall be a lien on any recovery or settlement, and payment thereof deferred pending *618the outcome of the action with leave to the plaintiffs at that time to apply, on notice to their former attorneys, for the reduction of such lien in the event the amount thereof should then prove disproportionate to the recovery. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

A client has the right to discharge his attorney at any time and for any reason which seems satisfactory to him, however arbitrary. *(Matter of Dunn,*205 N. Y. 398, 402; *Schwarts*v. *Tenenbaum,*6 A D 2d 810.) Accordingly it was error for the court below to impose as a condition precedent to substitution the requirement that the fee of the replaced attorneys be paid. *(Marrello*v. *Caputo,*4 A D 2d 768.) The outgoing attorneys were entitled only to the imposition of reasonable conditions for the protection of their retaining and charging liens. *(Friedman*v. *Gordon,*260 App. Div. 1023, affd. 285 N. Y. 630.) Such protection in this case may be accomplished by declaring the amount fixed by the court below to be a lien on and payable from any recovery or settlement. *(Brown*v. *Moffitt,*5 A D 2d 1002.)

Since, however, all the factors properly determining compensation, especially the size of the possible recovery, cannot even be estimated upon the present record, the plaintiffs are granted leave upon the outcome of this litigation, to apply on notice to their former attorneys for the reduction of the compensation presently fixed in the event the amount thereof should then prove disproportionate to the recovery. *(Casassa*v. *Automotive Co. of New Jersey,*276 App. Div. 923-924.)

Concur ■ — Pette, Hart and Di Gtovanka, JJ.

Order dismissed, etc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12286]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Matisse and the Sea” at the Saint Louis Art Museum, St. Louis, Missouri, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-27199 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NVAP: Category I and II Animals

Last Modified: 

Print

Be sure that the Accreditation Category you have chosen is appropriate for the

animals with which you’ll be doing accredited duties.

Category Definition

Category

I

All animals except food and fiber species, horses, birds, farm-raised

aquatic animals, all other livestock species, and zoo animals that can

transmit exotic animal diseases to livestock.

Category

II 

All animals

If you need to change your Accreditation Category, please submit VS Form 1-36Ato

your local NVAP Coordinator. If you are authorized in more than one State, you need

only send the form to one NVAP Coordinator and your Category will be updated in all

of the States in which you are authorized.

Examples

Here are some examples of Category I and Category II animal species. These lists

are not exhaustive, and if you wish to add a species, please email nvap@usda.gov.

Category Example Species
Category

I

Dog, cat, laboratory animal (rat, mouse, gerbil, guinea pig, hamster),

non-human primate, rabbit, ferret, mink, gopher, hedgehog, native nonruminant wildlife, and marine mammal.

Category

II 

Food and fiber animal species (cow, pig, sheep, goat, honey bees, turtles

raised for food, all ruminant), horse (mule, ass, pony, zebra), all bird

species and poultry, farm-raised aquatic animal species, livestock

species (bison, captive cervid, llama, alpaca, antelope, other hoofed

animal), zoo animals that can transmit exotic animal diseases to

livestock.

Contact Us

NVAP Coordinators

For questions about NVAP, contact your local NVAP Coordinator by selecting your

State or Territory from the dropdown menu below or visit More Information About

NVAP.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

All Contacts

Export requirements frequently change. Obtain current export requirements for live

animals or animal products before each shipment.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply562Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  CAROL NETTERBL... (not verified)PermalinkApril 24, 2017 - 9:48pm_x000D_ How nice to connect past and present. Barry must have lots of "Yankee" roots._x000D_ Thank you for an interesting read.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Allied Discount Co., Inc., Respondent, *v.*Bonded Auto Sales, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 12, 1959.

*Harold R. Kaplan*for appellant.

*Borden, Bkidell, Fleck é Bteindler (Herbert N. Bkidell*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The order granting summary judgment and judgment entered thereon should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to defendant, and motion for summary judgment denied, with $10 costs. In its opposing affidavit, defendant, through its president, showed the existence of a valid counterclaim in an amount exceeding plaintiff’s claim. That the counterclaim was not pleaded is of no moment. The affidavit, not the pleading, was controlling on the motion for summary judgment. (Cf. *Hellmuth*v. *Brandin,*3 A D 2d 997; see Shientag, Summary Judgment, pp. 65-66.)

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Gtovanna, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
\ PARAGUAY |
_

BRAZIL

.

Cordoba

URUGUAY -

Capital \
Federal

Mendoza

La Pampa

Buenos Aires|

Northern Argentina

Northern Argentina as per 9 CFR 94.29 refers to a region in Argentina located north of
Patagonia South and Patagonia North B. The region is located north of the Patagonia Region;
the Patagonia Region includes the region located south of the 42nd parallel known as
Patagonia South, and the region immediately north of the 42nd parallel known as Patagonia
North B. The limits of the Patagonia North B region are as follows: In the west along the Andes
Mountains (international border with the Republic of Chile) in the Province of Neuquén; in the
north along the Barrancas River at the border with the Province of Mendoza; in the east, the
border with the Province of Rio Negro; and in the south, the 42nd parallel and the southern
border with the Province of Chubut. The region within the country of Argentina, north of
Patagonia North B as described above is known as Northern Argentina.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A ofCentennial Communications Corp. (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended August 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tosuch officer’s knowledge:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Michael J. Small       Michael J. Small     Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate: December 12, 2005
43
October 30, 1998

21052

#### State v. Halloran

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 560 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 560

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 11, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 644) to reauthorize 
trade facilitation and trade enforcement functions and activities, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the conference report to its 
adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one 
motion to recommit if applicable.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take from 
the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2250) making appropriations for the 
Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, and for other 
purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, 
without intervention of any point of order, a single motion offered by the chair 
of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the 
Senate amendments. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as 
read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption 
without intervening motion or demand for division of the question.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael A. McManus,
Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  Date: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Michael A. McManus,
      Jr.Michael A. McManus,
      Jr.
      President and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained by
MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
  
 -30-
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 516 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 516

  Recognizing the individuals who have served, or are serving, in the 
 Armed Forces and have also served, or are serving, as a peace officer 
 or as a first responder and expressing support for the designation of 
 November 10 as Armed Forces, Peace Officer, and First Responder Dual 
                        Service Recognition Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2015

Mr. Wenstrup submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the individuals who have served, or are serving, in the 
 Armed Forces and have also served, or are serving, as a peace officer 
 or as a first responder and expressing support for the designation of 
 November 10 as Armed Forces, Peace Officer, and First Responder Dual 
                        Service Recognition Day.

Whereas members of the Armed Forces, peace officers, and first responders choose 
        to run toward danger rather than away from it in times of need;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces, peace officers, and first responders serve 
        and defend the public safety 365 days a year;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces, peace officers, and first responders often 
        fail to receive recognition or appreciation for their consistent acts of 
        service;
Whereas it is particularly fitting to recognize individuals who are twice the 
        servant, placing themselves at risk to defend the United States in the 
        Armed Forces and sacrificing to protect and serve communities in the 
        United States as a peace officer or as a first responder; and
Whereas November 10 would be an appropriate date to designate as Armed Forces, 
        Peace Officer, and First Responder Dual Service Recognition Day in 
        recognition of the selfless Americans who have served in the Armed 
        Forces and as a peace officer or as a first responder: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and honors individuals who have chosen to 
        serve in the Armed Forces and also as a peace officer or as a 
        first responder; and
            (2) supports the designation of Armed Forces, Peace 
        Officer, and First Responder Dual Service Recognition Day.
                                 <all>
```
115 P.3d 685

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Yong Ok Pegouskie

25518

06/27/2005

Denied

107 Hawai'i 360, 113 P.3d 811
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Legacy Petitions for Determination of

Nonregulated Status

Last Modified: 

Print

The table below shows all pending petitions that have been deemed complete and

previously made available for public comment.

Loading...
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-010

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

PRACTICAL TIP

A primate 

behaviorist can 

offer helpful guidance 

on setting up stable 

social partners for 

your primates. 

Primates: Natural Social Groupings 

and Compatibility 

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to help with promoting psychological well-being in primates. 

Topics covered in the series include social grouping, supporting species-typical activities, and special considerations. 

While all primates may benefit from social interaction, the pairings or 

social groupings they prefer vary by species. What is compatible for 

one species may not be for another.

For example, some species rarely do well with same-sex pairings or groups. You may 

improve your success with setting up compatible social housing by understanding the 

natural social groupings for the species in your care. 

DID YOU KNOW?

Compatible social 

groupings also 

depend on the 

individual animal 

and each primate’s 

temperament, past 

social experience, and 

current health status. 

Primates that have 

had limited social 

experience with 

others of their own 

species, especially 

during young ages, 

are often harder to 

socialize as adults.

Aggression does not necessarily 

mean that primates are not 

compatible. Aggressive interactions 

are a normal part of how many 

primate species establish and 

maintain their social relationships. 

FIGHTING 

Careful planning and continuous monitoring 

are crucial to help make sure primates are 

safely separated when aggression is too 

intense. Fighting that results in serious wounds 

or relentless aggression are clear indicators 

that the primates should be separated.

l Do best with only one

adult male in the

social group

l Females can be housed

together successfully

l Males of some

species may be housed

together when there

are no females

(“bachelor groups”)

Examples: gorillas, patas 

monkeys, drills, and many 

guenon species

Harem Groups

l Do best when

housed as a

mixed-sex pair

with offspring, 

if present

l May have

difficulty with

same-sex pairings of unrelated primates

l Aggression tends to be over territory

Examples: marmosets, tamarins, and 

owl monkeys

Family 

Groups

l Do not tend to live in true social

groups in the wild

l May do best with free access to

solitary spaces

Examples: nocturnal prosimians (e.g., 

bush babies, lorises) and orangutans

Solitary, But Social

l Offer the most options in

composing pairs or groups

l Aggression tends to be over

social dominance

l Aggression may also be over

resources, but that usually

stems from an underlying

dominance issue

Examples: macaques, capuchins, 

squirrel monkeys, spider monkeys, 

and baboons

Multi-Male/MultiFemale Groups
May 1, 1997

17994

#### Goldberg v. Rice

Affirmed
Opinion issued November 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00426-CV

———————————

PAUL SANTIAGO MOODY, Appellant

V.

HOWARD M. REINER, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF 

VICTORIANO G. SANTIAGO JR., DECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1106298

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Paul Santiago Moody, proceeding pro se, has failed to timely file 

his appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1), (d), 38.8(a)(1). On October 31, 

2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his deadline to file his appellant’s 

brief had expired and that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution
2

if he failed to timely file his appellant’s brief or an extension within 10 days of the 

date of that notice. See TEX.R. APP. P. 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Appellant failed 

to timely file a brief or request an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to 

timely file an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Lloyd, and Caughey.