alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.0




                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






I, James A.  Cannavino,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Direct  Insite Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that::

(1)  The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the three and nine
     months ended  September 30, 2008 (the  "Report"),  fully  complies with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 13, 2008





                                          /s/James A. Cannavino
                                          --------------------------------------
                                             James A. Cannavino
                                             Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>

                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






I, Michael J.  Beecher,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Direct  Insite Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that::

(1)  The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the three and nine
     months ended  September 30, 2008 (the  "Report"),  fully  complies with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934); and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 13, 2008
                                        /s/ Michael J. Beecher
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Beecher
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# C_2018328EN.01002901.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/29

---

Action brought on 23 July 2018 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-481/18)

(2018/C 328/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Szmytkowska and C. Sjödin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2012/39/EU of 26 November 2012 amending Directive 2006/17/EC as regards certain technical requirements for the testing of human tissues and cells (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify those provisions to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of Directive 2012/39/EU; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2012/39/EU of 26 November 2012 amending Directive 2006/17/EC as regards certain technical requirements for the testing of human tissues and cells (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify those provisions to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of Directive 2012/39/EU;

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Member States were required, under Article 2(1) of Directive 2012/39/EU, to adopt, by 17 June 2014, the national measures necessary to transpose the obligations under that directive into national law. Since the Italian Republic failed to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose that directive, or failed to notify those provisions to the Commission, the Commission has decided to refer the matter to the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 327, p. 24.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 585 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 585

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding an 
             Interstate 73 corridor transportation compact.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2016

   Mr. Hurt of Virginia (for himself, Ms. Adams, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Griffith, Mrs. Comstock, and Mr. Rice of South Carolina) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding an 
             Interstate 73 corridor transportation compact.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the entering into of an agreement or compact by 2 or more States, for 
cooperative effort and mutual assistance, would be beneficial to the 
development of an Interstate 73 corridor. Such an agreement may 
incorporate the following elements to the extent that such elements are 
consistent with Federal law and specifically section 1105(c)(5) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991:
            (1) Study, development, and promotion of a plan for the 
        design, construction, financing, and operation of the 
        Interstate 73 corridor through the States of South Carolina, 
        North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, and Michigan.
            (2) Coordination of efforts to establish a common legal 
        framework in all the signatory States to authorize and 
        facilitate design, construction, financing, and operation of 
        the Interstate 73 corridor or through public-private 
        partnerships.
            (3) Advocacy for Federal funding to support the 
        establishment of the Interstate 73 corridor.
            (4) Making available to the Interstate 73 corridor project 
        funding and resources that are or may be appropriated by the 
        signatory States and allocated for that purpose.
            (5) Doing all things necessary or convenient to facilitate 
        and coordinate the design, construction, financing, and 
        operation of the Interstate 73 corridor to the extent that such 
        plans and programs are consistent with Federal law and the laws 
        of the signatory States.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 574 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 574

 Calling for a restoration of civil government in Thailand established 
by fair, free, democratic, and open elections and expressing solidarity 
       with the people of Thailand in their desire for democracy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2015

Mr. Rohrabacher submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Calling for a restoration of civil government in Thailand established 
by fair, free, democratic, and open elections and expressing solidarity 
       with the people of Thailand in their desire for democracy.

Whereas King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand has been a stabilizing leader in his 
        commitment to democracy, economic development, and prosperity for the 
        Thai people;
Whereas the people of Thailand seek the same freedoms and hold the same 
        democratic values as the people of the United States;
Whereas Thailand has been a long-time friend and valued ally of the United 
        States;
Whereas, on May 2014, in response to a crisis within Thailand and with the 
        support of most Thai people, the military assumed power temporarily to 
        restore civil order and safety;
Whereas the military leader of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), 
        General Prayuth Chan-ocha, exercises authority to issue constitutional 
        reform and call for democratic elections; and
Whereas the Constituent Committee completed the drafting of a new constitution 
        on August 29, 2015, which was rejected by the National Reform Council on 
        September 6, 2015: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) calls for a restoration of civil government in Thailand 
        established by fair, free, democratic, and open elections; and
            (2) expresses solidarity with the people of Thailand in 
        their desire for democracy.
                                 <all>
```
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 16
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 16
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 16
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 16
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 16
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Ash Huzenlaub, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Emergisoft Holding,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement or a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controlsor in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: March 28, 2003 

 

 

/s/    Ash Huzenlaub 

                                                                                                                                               

Ash Huzenlaub 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 30, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D19-1581 Lower Tribunal No. F16-21185

________________ Nimer Abdallah, Appellant,
vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge. Law Offices of Kawass, P.A., and Kristen A. Kawass, for appellant.Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy CharestTurken and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Walter H. Ruth et al., Petitioners, against Incorporated Village of Colonie et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

September 26, 1958.

*Isador Taub*for petitioners.

*George A. Boland*for respondents.

William Deckelman, J.

Petitioners move under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order annulling a determination of respondents, dated August 8, 1958, which refused permission to petitioners to relocate certain outdoor advertising boards, and directing’ the village and its officers to issue to petitioners a license to relocate said outdoor advertising boards.

It appears that prior to petitioner’s application to respondents for a license to erect and maintain such advertising boards or signs the village had adopted a Building Zone Ordinance, and also an ordinance classifying, regulating and restricting the height of display signs, billboards and advertising signs, estab*525lishing minimum setbacks, constructions, erection and maintenance details of same and providing for the issuance of licenses therefor. There was also in existence at such time a Board of Appeals appointed pursuant to the Village Law and the General Ordinance of the village.

The respondents contend that the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the erection of billboards in the area specified in the application for a license, and the petitioners contend that the enactment of the sign ordinance was a repeal of the Village Zoning Ordinance so far as billboards are concerned. The court is constrained to hold that the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the erection of billboards in the specified area and on refusal of the respondents to issue the license applied for the petitioner’s further remedy was to appeal to the Board of Appeals from such refusal, and such appeal was a necessary prerequisite to the institution of this proceeding.

The application is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs.

Submit order.
Exhibit
32

# Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

I,
A. Jay Meyerson, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer, of  Aames Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
  The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
  31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

*     *     *





|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   
|----------------------- | --------------------------
|                        |                           
|                        |                           
|/s/ A. Jay Meyerson     | /s/ Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.
|A. Jay Meyerson         | Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.    
|                        |                           
|May 21, 2004            | May 21, 2004
# C_2018408EN.01004301.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/43

---

Appeal brought on 13 September 2018 by the Czech Republic against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) made on 28 June 2018 in Case T-147/15 Czech Republic v Commission

(Case C-575/18 P)

(2018/C 408/56)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Appellant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil and O. Serdula, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | set aside the order under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order under appeal;

| — | reject the plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court for it to rule on the form of order sought by the Czech Republic in the application; and |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court for it to rule on the form of order sought by the Czech Republic in the application; and

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal, alleging infringement of Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’).

In the order under appeal the General Court incorrectly concluded that the contested act, having regard in particular to the Commission’s lack of power to adopt a decision in the field of traditional own resources, was not an act against which an action could be brought under Article 263 TFEU, which according to the General Court did not conflict with the Czech Republic’s right to effective judicial protection within the meaning of Article 47 of the Charter, in so far as it was possible for the Czech Republic to pay the disputed amount conditionally, express objections to the soundness of the Commission’s legal view, and wait for the Commission to make an application under Article 258 TFEU.

The General Court’s conclusions are contrary to Article 263 TFU in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter, as conditional payment does not ensure that the dispute will in future be judged on the merits by the Court of Justice. That follows from the settled case-law of the Court of Justice on the Commission’s discretion in connection with proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations, from the absence of any provision on the concept of conditional payment, and in particular from the previous practice of the Commission in this field.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 630 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 630

Supporting the designation of March 2016, as National Colorectal Cancer 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2016

Mr. Payne (for himself, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Ms. McCollum, Mr. 
     Fitzpatrick, Mr. Lance, and Mr. Dent) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of March 2016, as National Colorectal Cancer 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men 
        and women combined in the United States;
Whereas this year, more than 130,000 individuals in the United States will be 
        diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 50,000 more will die 
        from it;
Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer 
        because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before 
        becoming cancerous;
Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, when treatment works 
        best;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every 
        individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 
        percent of deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized colorectal cancer 
        is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all diagnoses occur at this stage;
Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce colorectal cancer 
        incidence and mortality, yet, 1 in 3 adults between the ages of 50 and 
        75 are not up to date with recommended colorectal cancer screening;
Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on colorectal cancer 
        prevention, screening, and symptoms are held during the month of March 
        each year; and
Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to the public of 
        methods of prevention and screening, as well as about symptoms for early 
        detection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Colorectal 
        Cancer Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the month with appropriate awareness and educational 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```