[Cite as In re K.C., 2012-Ohio-4.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

K.C. 

 

 

JUDGES: 

Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. 

Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. 

Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. 

Case No. 11CA000021 

O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Guernsey County Court of 

Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case 

No. 11JC00225 

JUDGMENT: Affirmed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: January 3, 2012 

APPEARANCES: 

For Appellant For Appellee 

CHARLES E. MCKNIGHT AMBER D. WOOTTON 

121 West Eight St. Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 

Cambridge, Ohio 43725 139 W. 8th St. 

 Cambridge, Ohio 43725 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000021 2

Hoffman, P.J. 

(¶1) Appellant James Cummings (“Father”) appeals the June 21, 2011 Journal 

Entry entered by the Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, 

which adjudicated his minor daughter to be a dependent child and granted temporary 

custody of the child to Appellee Guernsey County Children Services Board (“GCCSB”). 

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE 

(¶2) K.C. (d.o.b. 6/6/97) is the biological daughter of Father and Heather Dawn 

McMillan (“Mother”).1

 The trial court issued an ex-parte order placing K.C. in the 

temporary custody of GCCSB on April 11, 2011. On the same day, GCCSB filed a 

Complaint, alleging K.C. was a neglected/dependent child. 

(¶3) The trial court conducted an adjudicatory hearing on June 13, 2011. Roy 

Higgins, an intake caseworker with GCCSB, testified as to the Agency’s involvement 

with the family. 

(¶4) In November, 2010, GCCSB received a report Father and K.C. had had a 

physical altercation. K.C. did not have any visible injuries, but her story raised 

significant concerns regarding the home. Father denied K.C.’s allegations, but verbally 

agreed to let the child stay with Nancy Wells, a longtime family friend and approved 

foster parent, on a safety plan. Father would not sign the safety plan. Father refused 

all services and the case was subsequently closed. K.C. returned to Father’s home 

sometime around Christmas, 2010. 

(¶5) In March, 2011, GCCSB received a report regarding a physical altercation 

between Father and K.C. K.C. alleged numerous drug addicts/dealers were coming 

 

1

 Mother is not a party to this Appeal. 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000021 3

and going from the home on a regular basis. Father agreed to a safety plan allowing 

K.C. to stay with Nancy Wells. Father met with GCCSB workers on two occasions to 

discuss available services. Father was not willing to work with GCCSB for voluntary 

ongoing services. Father denied using drugs, but refused to submit to a drug screen. 

Father was advised a refusal to a drug screen was considered a positive test result. 

(¶6) GCCSB received information an individual by the name of Paul Hackman 

was living in Father’s home, and Father was using and selling drugs. 

(¶7) Father did not present any witnesses on his behalf. The trial court found 

GCCSB presented clear and convincing evidence to establish K.C. was a dependent 

child. The trial court scheduled the matter for dispositional hearing on July 6, 2011. 

(¶8) Via Journal Entry filed June 21, 2011, the trial court memorialized its 

finding. The trial court ordered K.C. remain in the temporary emergency custody of 

GCCSB. 

(¶9) It is from this journal entry Father appeals, raising as error: 

(¶10) “I. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN MAKING THE 

FOLLOWING FINDING OF FACTS, AND THE FINDINGS WERE AGAINST THE 

MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE: 

(¶11) “II. THE TRIAL COURT’S DECISION ADJUDICATING THE CHILD TO BE 

DEPENDENT WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE AND AN 

ABUSE OF DISCRETION.” 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000021 4

I 

(¶12) In his first assignment of error, Father maintains the trial court abused its 

discretion in making certain findings of fact as such were against the manifest weight of 

the evidence. 

(¶13) Specifically, Father submits the trial court received "virtually no evidence 

to support" the following findings of fact: Paragraph 1: All information pertaining to a 

prior case allegedly involving the family; Paragraph 2: The finding GCCSB was 

involved in this case since November, 2010; Paragraph 2: The finding K.C. was "safety 

planned with Nancy Wells [since November of 2010] and the child was refusing to go 

home"; Paragraph 3: The finding K.C. “stayed with Nancy Wells until Christmas time of 

2010 when the father demanded that the child return home and she did"; Paragraph 4 

and footnote 1:The finding Paul Hackman, a family friend, was living in Father's house 

and was involved in an unrelated case which resulted in Hackman's children being 

permanently removed from his home and specifying the reason for the removal; 

Paragraph 5: The finding K.C. was unwilling to return to Father's home at the conclusion 

of the thirty day period of the safety plan; and Paragraph 5: The finding Nancy Wells 

was unwilling to provide a long term placement for K.C. 

(¶14) Father contends the trial court made certain findings, such as the case 

number of the prior case and the disposition of that matter (six months of protective 

supervision), despite the fact GCCSB did not present evidence at the adjudicatory 

hearing in the instant action to support such findings. Father adds GCCSB did not offer 

into evidence a copy of any entry from the prior case, and GCCSB's only witness, Roy 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000021 5

Higgins, testified he was not involved in the prior matter. Father concludes there was 

no competent, credible evidence to substantiate the trial court's findings. 

(¶15) Based upon the facts noted supra and upon review of the entire record in 

this matter, including the transcript of the adjudicatory hearing, we find any error in the 

findings of fact challenged by Appellant to be harmless. Read as a whole and in light of 

all the testimony, we find there are sufficient supported findings to conclude the trial 

court’s decision is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. (See our discussion 

of Appellant’s Assignment of Error II, infra.) 

(¶16) Father's first assignment of error is overruled. 

II 

(¶17) In his second assignment of error, Father challenges the trial court's 

adjudication of K.C. as a dependent child was an abuse of discretion and against the 

manifest weight of the evidence. Father acknowledges although it was proper for the 

trial court to consider his alleged drug use, Father submits his conduct was relevant 

"solely insofar as that parent's conduct forms a part of the environment of the child" and 

GCCSB presented no evidence such had a detrimental impact on K.C. We disagree. 

(¶18) R.C. 2151.04(C) provides: 

(¶19) “As used in this chapter, “dependent child” means any child: 

(¶20) “ * * * 

(¶21) “(C) Whose condition or environment is such as to warrant the state, in the 

interests of the child, in assuming the child's guardianship.” 

(¶22) Roy Higgins, the intake caseworker, testified at the time GCCSB 

requested emergency custody of K.C., Father had refused services and was not willing 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000021 6

to work on a voluntary case plan to resolve the issues in the home; K.C. was not willing 

to return to Father's home; and Nancy Wells could not provide a long-term placement 

for K.C. Further, Father admitted to intense verbal as well as physical altercations with 

K.C. GCCSB received numerous reports regarding Father's drug use. Father refused to 

submit to multiple drug screens even after he was advised his refusal would be 

considered a positive result. 

(¶23) Based upon the foregoing and the entire record in this matter, we find the 

trial court did not abuse its discretion in adjudicating K.C. to be a dependent child as 

such determination was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. 

(¶24) Father's second assignment of error is overruled. 

(¶25) The judgment of the Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile 

Court Division, is affirmed. 

By: Hoffman, P.J. 

Farmer, J. and 

Edwards, J. concur 

 s/ William B. Hoffman _________________

 HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN 

 s/ Sheila G. Farmer __________________

 HON. SHEILA G. FARMER 

 s/ Julie A. Edwards ___________________

 HON. JULIE A. EDWARDS 

 
Guernsey County, Case No. 11CA000021 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

IN THE MATTER OF: : 

 : 

K.C. : 

 : 

 : JUDGMENT ENTRY 

 : 

 : 

 : Case No. 11CA000021 

 For the reasons stated in our accompanying Opinion, the judgment of the 

Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Court Division, is affirmed. Costs to 

Appellant. 

 s/ William B. Hoffman _________________

 HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN 

 s/ Sheila G. Farmer __________________

 HON. SHEILA G. FARMER 

 s/ Julie A. Edwards___________________

 HON. JULIE A. EDWARDS