alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Listing Fractions in Facility Documents

ICWI0029.04 Page 1 of 1

Author: William L. Huls

Issue Date: 14Oct16

Source Document: Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, part 108.5(b)(1)

This document was developed for CVB-IC Specialists as an aid in determining what to 

consider as a “fraction” in the facility documents.

The following fractions may be included in the facility documents if they are used to 

prepare licensed product, test product, or if they are used or stored in R&D laboratories 

(if R&D is not separate and apart):

 Bacterial, viral, fungal, parasitic, and prion agents, both live and killed. List all 

bacterial, fungal, and parasitic agents by genus and species. For viruses, list the

full virus name (rather than general viral class; for example, Bovine Viral 

Diarrhea Type II versus Pestivirus). For prion agents, list the type; for example,

Chronic Wasting Disease.

 Peptides, if a component of final product

 Expressed proteins, if a component of biological product

 Recombinant organisms – list by organism rather than listing each individual 

recombinant.

 Cells 

 Toxins 

 Hybridomas, if foreign derived and for in vivo animal use

 Antibodies to a specific antigen

 Antitoxin to a specific antigen

 Master platforms for production platform technology based products

Do not include the following as fractions in the facility documents:

 Hybridomas, if not foreign derived and not for in vivo animal use

 Antiserums-positive or negative (diagnostic test kits)

 Fractions in R&D, if R&D is considered separate and apart by CVB

 Individual fractions used in autogenous products. Instead, in rooms where 

autogenous products are prepared these agents may be referred to collectively 

simply as ‘various autogenous agents’.

 Commercial biological indicators used as an aid in determining autoclave function

How to report fractions in the facility documents:

 Do not use abbreviations for fractions. Abbreviations may be acceptable if the full 

name is spell out on the first usage, for example Leptospira canicola and 

thereafter L canicola.

 List fractions in each room description within the blueprint legend, or make 

reference to a ‘Listing of Fractions’ in an addendum to the blueprint legend.

 Do not refer to fractions as “approved” or “licensed.”
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-46417 and 333-61161) of Landmark Systems
Corporation of our report dated February 21, 2001, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statements schedule which appears in Landmark
Systems Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected
Financial Data" which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC

McLean, Virginia
March 28, 2001
EXHIBIT 10.24

# EXCERPT FROM THE
RECORDS OF THEADMINISTRATIVE/COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE MEETING OFMAF BANCORP, INC.HELD JANUARY 24, 2006

Plan Amendment.The first sentence of Section 4.9 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows (changes
bolded):

| | In
the event of a Change in Control, a Participant (other than any Participant who is
formerly an officer or director of Westco Bancorp, Inc. or who becomes a Participant
after December 31, 2005) shall be credited with an additional ten (10) years of Plan
Service, however, in no event shall the Participants total years of Plan Service
exceed the lesser of 20 years or the Participants projected years of Plan Service at
age 68.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# MAF BANCORP, INC.

# CERTIFICATE OF
SECRETARY

# FEBRUARY 15, 2007

I, Carolyn Pihera, do hereby certify
that I am the duly elected and acting Secretary of MAF Bancorp, Inc. and that the
aforementioned is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the minutes of the
Administrative/Compensation Committee meeting held January 24, 2006, at which meeting a
quorum of the members of the Committee were present and acting throughout.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have
executed this Certificate and affixed the Companys seal this 15th day of
February, 2007.

|MAF BANCORP, INC. |  | 
|----------------- |  | 

| | /s/Carolyn PhiheraCorporate Secretary | 
| | --------------------------------------------------- |
18693

#### State v. Gross

January 16, 1997

Order No. 97-5

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6914
RESTONEY ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CA ROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; TOMMY LEE TINSLEY; WALTER JOHNSON; PAUL B. CALHOUN; HOWARD L. WOOTEN; W. PERRY MCNAIR; R. G. WAULER; CARRIE A. MOCK; PARRY H. LEARY, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Attorney General of North Carolina , No. CA-96-1 (M.D.N.C. May 14, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 428 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to protect House employees from employment discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived 

sexual orientation and gender identity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. HONDA (for himself and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

protect House employees from employment discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation 

and gender identity. 

1 Resolved, That clause 9 of rule XXIII (known as the 

2 Code of Official Conduct) is amended by inserting ‘‘actual 

3 or perceived’’ before ‘‘race’’ and by inserting ‘‘sexual ori4 entation or gender identity,’’ before ‘‘disability’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 304 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 304

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 10, 2015.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Kelly of Mississippi.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Abraham.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Kelly of Mississippi.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1 Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:31 PM
To: Tier 3 Rule Team Subject: FYI: Detailed responses to Big Oil's Big Malarkey a bout Tier 3 low-sulfur gasoline
Attachments: Refinery Lead Time Assessment.docx; The Need For Lo w Sulfur Fuel.docx

Importance: High

FYI only

From: Frank O'Donnell [ mailto:cleanairfrank@cleanairwatch.org ]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:14 AM
To: cleanairfrank@cleanairwatch.org Subject: Detailed responses to Big Oil's Big Malarkey about Tier 3 low-sulfur gasoline Importance: High

Dear friends,

We have heard a lot of malarkey in recent months fr om the oil industry as it desperately tries to dela y EPA’s upcoming “Tier 3” clean-car, clean-gasoline s tandards. These standards are badly needed to reduce smog and soot.

Among Big Oil’s biggest arguments: there isn’t enough time to make needed refinery cha nges by the start of 2017; and lower-sulfur gasoline really isn ’t needed.

You don’t need to take just my word that the indust ry is crying wolf, as it has so often in the past: http://www.cleanairwatch.org/2013/04/clean-air-watc h-to-epa-oil-indistry-has.html

I thought you might find the attached worth your ti me. These are detailed – and new -- analyses of these issues by Michael P. Walsh, a world- renowned auto emissions expert http://www.walshcarlines.com/ who, among many other things, once ran the EPA moto r vehicle emission control program.

These are extremely detailed and dispassionate anal yses. To sum them up:

• Regarding time needed to clean up the fuel: Even without the flexibilities provided by the Tier 3 Rule, most refineries should have no difficu lty complying with the sulfur standar d by January 1, 2017 or earlier. The various flexibiliti es that the Tier 3 rule provides to refiners - the ABT (averaging, banking and trading) program, the s mall refiner delay provisions and the hardship provisions - assures for those limited ins tances w here needed that there is additional time for complying.

• And as for the need to clean up the fuel: Sulfur in gasoline poisons catalysts, increases vehicle emissions, limits technology choices and im pairs fuel efficiency. Future vehicle fleets will need g asoline with much lower sulfur levels than availabl e today if they are to meet the proposed Tier 3 vehicle emission standards, and Tie r 3 will be infeasible without its proposed 10 ppm refinery annual average sulfur limit.2 I hope you will keep these in m ind as you evaluate the ongoing attempts by the oil industry to
bamboozle both the White House and the media!
930 P.2d 1016

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

17603

#### State v. Nakamura

January 13, 1997

Order No. 97-1

Affirmed
#### Vista Sales Corp., Respondent, *v.*Briggsford Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 6,1971.

*691
      *Abraham J. Yasgour*for appellant. *Rhoades é Rhoades (Darnel Rhoades*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The parties entered into a stipulation with respect to the amount of the debtor employee’s total weekly salary, and were bound thereby. In granting judgment against the employer under an income execution, pursuant to CPLR 5231 (subd. [e]), the trial court erred in calculating the employee’s salary in an amount greater than that fixed in the stipulation.

While we do not agree with the trial court that appellant waived its objection to the service of the execution by failing to plead the objection in its answer, on the merits we find that appellant, by its conduct, accepted the service as made and was bound by the execution.

The judgment should be modified by decreasing petitioner’s recovery to the sum of $122.40, with appropriate interest and costs, and as modified, affirmed without costs.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Lupiano and Gold, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of MAF Bancorp, Inc. on the basis of each
such officer's knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of MAF Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 15, 2005                           /s/  Allen H. Koranda
                                                ---------------------
                                        Name:   Allen H. Koranda
                                        Title:  Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer



Date:  March 15, 2005                           /s/  Jerry A. Weberling
                                                -----------------------
                                        Name:   Jerry A. Weberling
                                        Title:  Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification
accompanies the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the Form 10-K.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
     ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
     SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854152
<NAME>                        ACTV Financial Data Schedule

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,520,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  410,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    337,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,585,415
<PP&E>                                         994,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,692,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,491,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,178,711
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,022,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,692,624
<SALES>                                      1,459,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,476,329
<CGS>                                          647,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,288,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,304,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               357,071
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,800,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,800,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,800,481)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.75


</TABLE>
February 9, 2004

23583

#### Gamboa v. Koller

Affirmed
92 P.3d 491

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

June 21, 2004

23839

#### Abordo v. Beaver

Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated statement of financial position of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P.
as of September 30, 1999 and the related consolidated statement of income for
the period then ended.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             14
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    25,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65,213
<PP&E>                                        288,023
<DEPRECIATION>                              (128,428)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                242,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          64,516
<BONDS>                                         5,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    172,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  242,353
<SALES>                                       166,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  465
<CGS>                                         166,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 173,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (6,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (6,621)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (6,621)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R. Tauscher, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:  August 13, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   |   |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |   |
|                   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G. Thomasch, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: August 13, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ James G. Thomasch    |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                  |   |   | James  G. Thomasch       |   |
|                  |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Interland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel J. Kocher, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  December 29, 2003.
                                      /s/ Joel J. Kocher
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Joel J. Kocher
                                      Chairman of the Board, President and
                                      Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 517 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 5, 2015. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Brady of Texas, 

Chair, and Mr. Rice of South Carolina. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
##### 



Exhibit 11 XATA CORPORATION
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Years Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 2004
    
    2003BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATIONNet loss
    
    $
    (1,190,964
    )
    
    $
    (3,783,859
    )Less: preferred stock dividend
    
    
    (135,851
    )
    
    
    Net loss as adjusted
    
    
    (1,326,815
    )
    
    
    (3,783,859
    )Weighted average shares outstanding
    
    
    7,021,573
    
    
    
    6,934,416Basic and diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.19
    )
    
    $
    (0.55
    )BASIC AND DILUTED COMPUTATION LOSS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERSNet loss
    
    $
    (1,190,964
    )
    
    $
    (3,783,859
    )Less: preferred stock dividend
    
    
    (135,851
    )
    
    
    Less: preferred stock deemed dividend
    
    
    (729,912
    )
    
    
    Net loss to common shareholders
    
    
    (2,056,727
    )
    
    
    (3,783,859
    )Weighted average shares outstanding
    
    
    7,021,573
    
    
    
    6,934,416Basic and diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.29
    )
    
    $
    (0.55
    )
 Note: See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements