alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AFG
INVESTMENT TRUST A AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,903,620
<SECURITIES>                                    76,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                  605,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,585,596
<PP&E>                                      12,955,456
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,168,445)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,372,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          475,177
<BONDS>                                        623,171
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,274,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,372,607
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               720,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               412,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                294,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            294,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   294,548
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EX-32.1
      CERTIFICATION OF CEO/CFO (Pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002)





CERTIFICATION







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Lake Resources Inc. (“Issuer”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the Fiscal Quarter Ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Father
      Gregory Ofiesh, as Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Act
      of 1934; and





2
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.








Dated:
      June 13, 2007


/s/
                Father Gregory
                OfieshPresident
                & CEO and Acting Chief Financial
                Officer
H. Res. 4 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 6, 2015. 

Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the 

President of the United States that the House of Representatives has elected John A. Boehner, a Representative from the 

State of Ohio as Speaker, and Karen L. Haas, a citizen of 

the State of Maryland as Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11783Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Denyel Stokes (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 9, 2022 - 10:55amThank you for sharing your story, I applaud you for your strength and positive outlook on thriving in life. I to  have gone through multiple family deaths recently and really understand your pain.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

Article 3

1.   Croatia accedes to the decisions and agreements of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States meeting within the European Council.

2.   Croatia accedes to the decisions and agreements adopted by the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council.

3.   Croatia is in the same situation as the present Member States in respect of declarations or resolutions of, or other positions taken up by, the European Council or the Council and in respect of those concerning the Union adopted by common agreement of the Member States. Croatia will accordingly observe the principles and guidelines deriving from those declarations, resolutions or other positions and will take such measures as may be necessary to ensure their implementation.

4.   Croatia accedes to the conventions and protocols listed in Annex I. Those conventions and protocols shall enter into force in relation to Croatia on the date determined by the Council in the decisions referred to in paragraph 5.

5.   The Council, acting unanimously on a recommendation by the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall decide to make all adjustments required by reason of the accession to the conventions and protocols referred to in paragraph 4 and publish the adapted texts in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

6.   Croatia undertakes, in respect of the conventions and protocols referred to in paragraph 4, to introduce administrative and other arrangements, such as those adopted by the date of accession by the present Member States or by the Council, and to facilitate practical cooperation between the Member States' institutions and organisations.

7.   The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may supplement Annex I with the relevant conventions, agreements and protocols signed before the date of accession.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XUE JUN ZHOU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72502

Agency No. A075-123-741

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Xue Jun Zhou, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and

FILED

SEP 26 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72502

constitutional claims, Vilchez v. Holder, 682 F.3d 1195, 1198 (9th Cir. 2012), and

we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in declining to separately evaluate the hardship Zhou’s

United States citizen son would experience if the son returned to China with Zhou,

where there was insufficient evidence that Zhou’s son would accompany him. See

Perez v. INS, 96 F.3d 390, 393 (9th Cir. 1996) (requiring evidence to support an

otherwise speculative hardship scenario); cf. Salcido-Salcido v. INS, 138 F.3d

1292, 1293 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). Zhou’s argument that the BIA failed to

consider financial hardship is not supported by the record. It follows that Zhou’s

due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)

(requiring error and substantial prejudice for a petitioner to prevail on a due

process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of Interpore International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 29, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard L. Harrison                                              
|                      |  |  |  |                                                                      
|                      |  |  |  | Richard L. Harrison Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interpore International, Inc. and will be retained by Interpore International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Retotal v. Hawai'i Ballroom Dance Ass'n

23763

03/07/2002

Affirmed
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for each of the following insured depository institutions, was charged with the duty of winding up the affairs of the former institutions and liquidating all related assets. The Receiver has fulfilled its obligations and made all dividend distributions required by law. Notice of Termination of Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Termination date10056
Michigan Heritage Bank
Farmington Hills
MI
12/01/202310060
Westsound Bank
Bremerton
WA
12/01/202310068
Community Bank of West Georgia
Villa Rica
GA
12/01/202310101
Community Bank of Arizona
Phoenix
AZ
12/01/202310180
Community Bank & Trust
Cornelia
GA
12/01/2023( print page 84819)10366
First Georgia Banking Company
Franklin
GA
12/01/202310369
Atlantic Bank & Trust
Charleston
SC
12/01/202310441
Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Charleston
SC
12/01/202310448
Montgomery Bank & Trust
Ailey
GA
12/01/202310462
Gulfsouth Private Bank
Destin
FL
12/01/2023
 The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective on the termination dates listed above, the Receiverships have been terminated, the Receiver has been discharged, and the Receiverships have ceased to exist as legal entities. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on December 1, 2023. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2023-26774 Filed 12-5-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-11244

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SETH ALBERTO ACOSTA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-474-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Seth Alberto Acosta has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Acosta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 23, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-11244 Document: 00513242313 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
No. 14-11244

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-11244 Document: 00513242313 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
#### Daniel Allen TEMPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Samuel W. SMITH, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14232.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 20, 1976.

*1275James T. Massey, Salt Lake County Bar Legal Services, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from the dismissal of a habeas corpus petition. Affirmed.

Petitioner was committed to State Prison in *December 1969*after conviction on two grand larceny counts. Nearly three years later, on *September 27, 1972,*he was given by the Board of Pardons a prospective parole effective *March, 1974,*— a year and a half later, — conditioned on good behavior at a so-called Odyssey House, a rehabilitation center, or sort of Halfway House. After he was given this chance outside the prison walls, he accommodated himself and embarassed the Warden and the Board by escaping (on his own written admission) some five months later, and, after being arrested in Texas, under an alias for car theft, was returned to the Utah Prison after everyone found out who he was, — and' after he overstayed the leave granted by his benefactors beyond even the prospective parole release date. After he was returned, the Board rescinded the prospective release date.

Temple now urges that he should have been given the red carpet treatment of a parole — -which he was not accorded, — either *before*or *after*the prospective date, demanding that he should have had a hearing with written notice, disclosure of evidence against him, an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, before a neutral body, with findings of fact, preliminary hearing, right of counsel, ad infini-tum, under a couple of cases that are complete strangers to this case.1 All these things are claimed as falling within some sort of constitutional rights, by an aliased convicted felony escapee.

All this adds up to two conclusions: 1) That this appeal appears to be frivolous and 2) that the concepts of constitutional rights and due process and liberty and victimization of citizens and the like, need a re-examination.

ELLETT, CROCKETT and TUCK-ETT, JJ., concur.

MAUGHAN, J., concurs in the result.

1

. *Morrissey v. Brewer,*408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and *Gagnon v. Scarpelli,*411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).
#### State v. Roush

23486

10/02/2003

Vacated and remanded
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Gus D. Halas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ GUS D. HALASGus D. HalasChief Executive OfficerNovember 3, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to T-3 Energy Services, Inc. and will be retained by T-3 Energy
Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CHAPTER 2.4.1.

**INFECTION WITH ABALONE HERPESVIRUS**

[...]

**2.2.	Host factors**

~~Currently, species known to be susceptible to AVG in Australia are the greenlip abalone (*Haliotis laevigata*), blacklip abalone (*H. rubra*) and hybrids of these two species. Clinical signs consistent with AVG have not been reported in other molluscan species in areas where AVG is suspected to be enzootic. In Chinese Taipei, ganglioneuritis associated with a herpes viral infection and high mortalities in the *H. diversicolor supertexta* abalone species have been reported. The disease was reported only in *H. diversicolor supertexta*, while cohabitating Japanese black abalone *H. discus*remained normal (Chang et al., 2005).~~

**2.2.1.	Susceptible host species**

~~Greenlip abalone – Haliotis laevigata~~

~~Blacklip abalone – H. rubra~~

~~Hybrid (greenlip × blacklip) – H. laevigata × H. rubra~~

~~Diversicolor abalone or jiukong abalone - H. diversicolor~~

Species that fulfil the criteria for listing as susceptible to infection with abalone herpesvirus according to Chapter 1.5. of the *Aquatic Animal Health Code* (*Aquatic Code*) are: Blacklip abalone (*Haliotis rubra),*greenlip abalone (*Haliotis laevigata)*, hybrids of greenlip x blacklip abalone (*Haliotis laevigata*x *Haliotis rubra) and*small abalone (*Haliotis diversicolor).*

**2.2.2. ~~Susceptible stages of the host~~ Species with incomplete evidence for susceptibility**

~~All ages.~~

Species for which there is incomplete evidence to fulfil the criteria for listing as susceptible to infection with abalone herpesvirus**according to Chapter 1.5 of the *Aquatic Code*are: none known.

In addition, pathogen-specific positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results have been reported in the following species, but no active infection has been demonstrated:Japanese abalone (*Haliotis discus*) and rainbow abalone (*Haliotis iris*).

[...]

**________________________**
Exhibit 23.3


                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-1240), Form S-8
(No. 33-32519), Form S-8 (No. 333-50962) and Form S-3 (No. 333-56651) of
Financial Federal Corporation of our report dated August 31, 2000, included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


EISNER & LUBIN LLP
/s/ EISNER & LUBIN LLP
New York, New York
October 28, 2002

                                     45
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 38 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 38

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 21, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 161) to provide for the timely 
consideration of all licenses, permits, and approvals required under Federal law 
with respect to the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of any natural 
gas pipeline projects. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (H.R. 36) to amend title 18, United States Code, to 
protect pain-capable unborn children, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered 
as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary or their respective designees; and (2) 
one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### State v. Quinley

15090

5/26/94

Affirmed

836 P.2d 510