alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019423EN.01003401.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Pink Lady America v CPVO — WAAA (Cripps Pink)

(Case T-112/18) (1)

(Plant varieties - Nullity proceedings - Cripps Pink apple variety – Articles 10 and 116 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - Novelty - Derogative grace period - Definition of exploitation of the variety - Commercial evaluation - Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 - Late submission of evidence before the Board of Appeal - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)

(2019/C 423/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pink Lady America LLC (Yakima, Washington, United States)) (represented by: initially by R. Manno and S. Travaglio, and subsequently by R. Manno, lawyer)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: M. Ekvad, F. Mattina and M. Garcia Monco-Fuente Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO and intervener before the General Court: Western Australian Agriculture Authority (WAAA) (South Perth, Australia) (represented by: T. Bouvet and L. Romestant, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 14 September 2017 (Case A 007/2016), relating to nullity proceedings between the WAAA and Pink Lady America LLC.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pink Lady America LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pink Lady America LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 53 

Condemning the cowardly attack on innocent men, women, and children 

in the northeastern Nigerian town of Baga. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the cowardly attack on innocent men, women, 

and children in the northeastern Nigerian town of Baga. 

Whereas, on the night of January 3, 2015, the terrorist 

group Boko Haram launched a cowardly attack on innocent men, women, and children in the northeastern Nigerian town of Baga; 

Whereas the terrorists of Boko Haram used assault rifles, 

grenade launchers, and fire to slaughter innocent civilians; 

Whereas the scope of casualties in this attack totals in the 

hundreds and possibly thousands; 

Whereas most of the victims of this attack were women, children, and elderly people; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 53 IH 

Whereas Amnesty International describes the attack as the 

terrorist group’s ‘‘deadliest massacre’’ to date; 

Whereas local defense groups are reported to have given up 

counting the bodies left lying on the streets of Baga; 

Whereas these unprovoked attacks have resulted in many Nigerians being not likely to vote in the upcoming Presidential elections; 

Whereas human rights groups have indicated that the Nigerian state security forces should improve efforts to protect civilians during offensive operations against Boko 

Haram; 

Whereas numerous reports have indicated security forces in 

the region are fleeing when confronted by Boko Haram; 

Whereas Boko Haram now reportedly controls Baga and 16 

neighboring towns in northeastern Nigeria; 

Whereas this terrorist group killed 10,000 people in Nigeria 

alone in 2014; and 

Whereas Boko Haram has displaced over 1,000,000 innocent 

people: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its strong support for the people 

3 of Nigeria, especially the men, women, and children 

4 in the northeastern Nigerian town of Baga who were 

5 victimized, abducted, trafficked, and murdered by 

6 the terrorist group Boko Haram; 

7 (2) condemns Boko Haram for its violent at8 tacks on civilian targets, including schools, mosques, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 53 IH 

1 churches, villages, and agricultural centers in Nige2 ria; 

3 (3) encourages the Government of Nigeria to 

4 strengthen efforts to protect civilians from the ter5 rorists of Boko Haram; 

6 (4) supports offers of United States assistance 

7 to the Government of Nigeria in the search for the 

8 school girls abducted by Boko Haram; and 

9 (5) encourages the Government of Nigeria to 

10 work with the United States, and other governments 

11 in the region such as Chad, Niger, and Cameroon, 

12 to defeat Boko Haram. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 22004D0033 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22004D0033

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 33/2004 of 19 March 2004 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 127 , 29/04/2004 P. 0144 - 0156 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 33/2004

of 19 March 2004

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 14/2004 of 6 February 2004(1).

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 143/2002 of 24 January 2002 amending Annex 1 to Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 in the view of the organisation of the Community surveys on the structure of agricultural holding in 2003, 2005 and 2007(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Annex XXI to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

1. The following indent shall be added in point 23 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88):

"- 32002 R 0143: Commission Regulation (EC) No 143/2002 of 24 January 2002 (OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 16)."

2. In adaptation (f) of point 23 (Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88), "and 2003/2005/2007" shall be added to the last sentence.

3. The list in Appendix 1 shall be replaced with the list in the Annex to the present Decision.

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 143/2002 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 20 March 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 116, 22.4.2004, p. 66.

(2) OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 16.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.

ANNEX

to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 33/2004

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.014502.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.014601.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.014701.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.014801.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.014901.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015001.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015101.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015201.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015301.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015401.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015501.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2004127EN.015601.TIF">
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          26,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,504
<INVENTORY>                                     43,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,321
<PP&E>                                          38,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,247
<SALES>                                        362,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,624
<CGS>                                          327,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  366,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                       574
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.31)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1592

ROSA MCLEAN BOURGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EATON CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-98-266-1-T)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosa McLean Bourger, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill

Stricklin Cox, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rosa McLean Bourger appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in her employment discrimination

suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Bourger v. Eaton Corp., No. CA-98-266-1-T

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23

                   [LETTERHEAD OF YOUNT, HYDE & BARBOUR, P.C.]


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statement of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. (formerly Marathon Financial
Corporation) - Form S-8, Registration No. 333-41163 - and in the prospectus
    related to it, of our report dated January 18, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. included
in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.


Winchester, Virginia
April 1, 2002
#### Seanor *v.*Fitt, Appellant

(No. 1).

*Appeals*— Assignments *of error*— More *than one point.*

1. An assignment of error embracing more than one point violates the rules of court and will not be considered.

*Partnership*— Bale *of partner’s property to firm.*

2. A partner can recover in assumpsit, from Ms copartners individually, the amount they have personally agreed to pay to Mm for a sale of Ms property to the firm.

Argued Jan. 7, 1919.

Appeal, No. 74, Oct. T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Westmoreland Co., Nov. T., 1915, No. 139, on verdict for plaintiff in case of George W. Seanor, Executor of Noah Seanor, deceased, v. John H. Fitt.

Before Brown, C. J., Stewart, Mosohzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson and Kephart, JJ.

Affirmed.

*390January 20, 1919:

Assumpsit for breach of a contract. Before McConnell, J.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,907.07. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was in refusing five points for charge.

*Benjamin H. Thompson,*with him *H. K. Shaffer,*for appellant.

*Eugh W. Walkinshaw*and *Lewis C. Walkinshaw,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

There is a single assignment of error in this case. It avers that the court below erred in refusing five separate and distinct points for charge, all of which, with the answers thereto, are embodied in the one assignment. By rule 26 of the rules of this court, such joinder constitutes “a waiver of all the errors so alleged”; and there is, therefore, nothing we are called upon to consider.

We are less regretful of this, because, upon the merits, there is nothing in appellant’s contention. The suit was upon an agreement by which the stock of goods of the Plumville Lumber Company, belonging to Noah Seanor alone, was sold to a partnership consisting of Noah Sea-nor, the defendant, Fitt, and George H. Hileman, defendant and Hileman each personally agreeing to pay Seanor one-third of the appraised value thereof. When the stock was appraised, Hileman paid his one-third, but Fitt paid only a portion of his, and his attempt, at the two trials of the case, was to tangle up the matter with the later affairs of the partnership. In this he was unsuccessful, as he should have been. So far as the duty to pay was concerned, it was an individual and not a partnership transaction.

*391The bill of sale of February 18, 1915, suggested as releasing the defendant, relates only to “bills, notes, accounts or other claims due aud owing by said company.” This suit, as stated above, is to recover a personal indebtedness of the defendant, and is not “due and owing by said company.”

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 457 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 457

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 
House be in session at least 40 hours each week other than a week that 
                is designated as a district work period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2015

Mr. Jolly submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 
House be in session at least 40 hours each week other than a week that 
                is designated as a district work period.

    Resolved, That rule XIV is amended by adding at the end the 
following new clause:
    ``7.(a) Except as provided by paragraph (b), the House shall be in 
session at least 40 hours each week other than a week that is 
designated as a district work period.
    ``(b) In any week in which a legal holiday occurs, other than a 
week that is designated as a district work period, the House shall be 
in session at least 8 hours per day for the remaining days of such 
week.''.
                                 <all>
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Mobile Data Collection Tools: General

Training Documents

Last Modified: 

Print

Locate step-by-step support on mobile application user guides, devices, and related

systems.

Apple iPad

PPQ iPads: Getting Started Guide

The Apple iPad versus the Human Baby

Offline Document Access: iPad

Top PPQ iPad Troubleshooting Tips

ArcGIS Field Maps

Access Training Maps Job Aid

ArcGIS Field Maps Getting Started Guide

ArcGIS Survey123
ArcGIS Survey123 Getting Started Guide

eTRAP

eTRAP Field Keys

eTRAP Application (Electronic Trap Recording & Accounting Program) User

Guide

IPHIS

IDC Mobile Application User Guide

Job Aids

IPHIS: 4 Steps to Data Entry

IPHIS: Lexicon of Words

IPHIS: Surveys Defined

IPHIS: User Roles
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NWDP: Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease

Virus Type 2 (RHDV2)

Last Modified: 

Print

Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus type 2 (RHDV2) is a viral disease fatal to both

domestic and wild lagomorph species (rabbits and hares). It is not known to affect

people or other animals. 

It was first detected in wild rabbit populations in the United States in March 2020.

Since then, the NWDP has worked closely with Veterinary Services and diagnostic
labs to track all wild lagomorph samples submitted for testing, report test results to

State wildlife agencies, and provide crucial data used in OIE reporting, disease

mapping, and genetic sequencing.

Affected Species

RHDV2 is a highly contagious disease caused by a strain of the RHD virus. RHDV2

can be spread by contact with infected rabbits, their meat or fur, or materials that

infected rabbits have come in contact with. Many times, the only signs of the

disease are sudden death and blood-stained noses caused by internal bleeding. In

the United States, the virus has spread to wild rabbit populations in at least 14

States since March 2020.

Wild lagomorph species affected in the United States include:

Eastern cottontail

Desert cottontail

Mountain cottontail

Black-tailed jackrabbit

Antelope jackrabbit

Brush rabbit

Pygmy rabbit

Riparian brush rabbit

NWDP Activities

NWDP works closely with collaborators and other Federal and State agencies to track

and report the prevalence and spread of RHDV2 across the United States.

More Information

USDA APHIS 2020 Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease - Affected Counties

Contact Us

National Wildlife Disease Program
The National Wildlife Disease Program works with partners nationwide to conduct

disease monitoring and surveillance in wild animals and is the primary emergency

response contact point within APHIS Wildlife Services. Our program coordinator is

available for questions about wildlife disease monitoring and surveillance, the status

of disease outbreaks and emerging disease events, and wildlife emergency response

activities in natural disasters (floods, hurricanes, wildfires) or oil spills.

Julianna Lenoch

National Wildlife Disease Program Coordinator

Email: julianna.b.lenoch@usda.gov

Phone: 970-266-6350

Sarah Bevins

Assistant National Wildlife Disease Program Coordinator

Email: sarah.n.bevins@usda.gov

All Contacts
# C_2018166EN.01002501.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 5 March 2018 — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v État belge

(Case C-174/18)

(2018/C 166/32)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz

Applicants:

Defendants: État belge

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it contrary to Article 39 [EC, now Article 45 TFEU] for the Belgian tax system, in Article 155 of the CIR/92 and regardless of whether or not Circular No Ci.RH.331/575.420 of 12 March 2008 is applied, to have the effect that the Luxembourg pensions of the applicant Mr Jacob, which are exempted from tax pursuant to Article 18 of the Convention concluded between Belgium and Luxembourg for the avoidance of double taxation, are taken into account for the purpose of calculating the tax payable in Belgium and used as the basis of assessment for the granting of tax advantages provided for under the CIR/92, even though they should not form part of that basis by reason of their total exemption as provided for in the Convention for the avoidance of double taxation, and that those advantages, such as the tax-free allowance, long-term savings, costs paid with service vouchers, costs incurred in saving energy in the home, costs incurred in protecting the home against theft or fire, and charitable donations made by the applicant Mr Jacob, are partly lost, reduced or granted to a lesser extent than if both applicants had income earned in Belgium, which, for its part, is taxable in Belgium and is not exempt and may thus absorb the tax advantages in their entirety?

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden & Blake Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the
undersigned:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert W. PeshekRobert W. Peshek, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q and shall not be treated as having
been filed as part of the Form 10-Q. 29
19084

#### State v. Kamai

Affirmed