alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hi, Barbara and Jessica: We, in BEAD, do not expect that the addition of existing crops on to a new

formulation will affect the Abamectin SLUA (PCT) numbers in the future. Please let Sepehr, Don and I know if you all have additional questions/comments. Steve 703 - 308 - 8105
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75826, 333-01273, 333-03131, 333-18001, 333-76338, 333-109263, and 333-130741) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58742, 33-76652, 33-94730, 333-24969, 33-94736, 333-40315, 333-48911, 333-40572,
333-104094, 333-104095, 333-115921, 333-127987, and 333-137848) of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated December 7, 2006 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected Financial Data in this Form 10-K.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP        
|                                      
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP            
|Boston, Massachusetts December 7,
2006
99 P.3d 614

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Lagmay

25715

10/08/2004

Affirmed
March 13, 2006

27258

#### State v. Anzai

Affirmed
Order filed, June 02, 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00781

- CV

____________ IN THE MATTER OF I.F .M. , Appellant

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14

- CJV

- 019259



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 17, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On April 12, 2016, this court ordered the court reporter to file the
record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the co urt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Kelly Kelly , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be

entert ained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Kelly Kelly does not timely file the record as ordered, we
will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8557

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ANTHONY JOE WILLIAMSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:97-cr-00345-CWH-1)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Joe Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Joe Williamson appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Williamson asserts on appeal that the district court erred in declining to sentence him below the amended Guidelines range for crack cocaine offenses, contending that a lower sentence would be permitted by Kimbrough v. United
States , 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007), and United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). However, this argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Dunphy , 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed , 77 U.S.L.W. 3559 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2009) (No. 08-1185). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a sentence at the low end of the amended Guidelines range. See United States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R.Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:  May 15, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |   |   |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G.Thomasch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: May 15, 2007 | By:    | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   | James G. Thomasch       |   |   |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
November 14, 1996

18441

#### State v. Finnigan

Order No. 96-38

Affirmed
H. Res. 370 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 23, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3009) to 

amend section 241(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

to deny assistance under such section to a State or political 

subdivision of a State that prohibits its officials from taking 

certain actions with respect to immigration. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
24284

#### Wada v. Kuba

Affirmed
#### In the Matter of Manufacturers Trust Company, Judgment Creditor, against Philip Q. Valenti, Judgment Debtor.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 3, 1959.

*Simpson, Thacher $ Bartlett*for judgment creditor.

*Guy M. Puea*for judgment debtor.

*387Saul S. Street, J.

This is a motion to punish judgment debtor for contempt of court in failing to obey an order directing monthly installment payments in accordance with section 793 of the Civil Practice Act.

The judgment debtor resists this motion urging that the court had no jurisdiction of the original motion directing such payments.

The order directing such payments was granted on default.

The affidavit in support of such motion does not recite the residence or business address of the judgment debtor. However, the transcript of the examination in supplementary proceedings reveals the residence and business address of the judgment debtor to be Garden City, Long Island, New York. This fact has not been disputed. Section 793 must be read with the other sections of article 45 of the Civil Practice Act. Where the debtor neither has his residence nor place of business in a county where the action was brought, the proceeding shall be instituted in the county or Supreme Court of the county where the judgment debtor resides or has his place of business.

A failure to comply with section 777, makes the order granted pursuant to section 793 void. *(Matter of Schmidt*v. *Lavelle,*126 Misc. 589.)

Accordingly, the motion to punish for contempt is denied.
25792

#### State v. Kahale

Affirmed
#### State v. Pineridge Farms, Inc.

22583

03/16/2000

Affirmed
If you see signs of illness, take action right away! Phone Number

Veterinarian

Cooperative Extension Office 

State Veterinarian/Animal or Poultry Diagnostic Lab 

USDA 866.536.7593

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Report Sick Birds

Checklist To Report 

Unusual Mortality

While everyone who raises poultry works very hard to keep their flocks healthy and 

intact, the reality is that eventually you will encounter dead birds within your flock. But 

what is normal and when do you have a problem? It’s important to know when you might

have an issue and what to expect from there. Whether you’re part of a large commercial

enterprise or keep birds as a hobby, make sure you know when and how to report 

higher-than-normal or unexplained bird deaths.

If you see or suspect anything unusual, call your flock supervisor, veterinarian, or

cooperative extension office right away. Use this form to record phone numbers for

contacts in your area. The earlier you act, the easier it is to contain the disease to a

single flock.

Check the list on the back for tips

to help keep your flocks healthy. √
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 2235-7 | Issued July 2019

Checklist:Tips for Reporting

Unusual Mortality

This checklist is a general guide to practicing good biosecurity, but if you have a site-specific 

biosecurity plan, please follow it. Commercial growers should be sure their site-specific plans 

follow the National Poultry Improvement Plan biosecurity principles.

√

Know when to worry: Some bird death is 

normal. A large percentage of dead or dying 

birds in your flock is not normal.

Rule out obvious causes, such as predators, 

weather issues, or other external factors. You 

don’t need to report those bird deaths, but 

consider addressing the root cause so you 

can keep it from happening again.

If you see signs of illness in your flock, 

make note of what you’re seeing.

Report any signs of illness or unexplained 

deaths to animal health officials right away. 

This will help prevent the spread of disease 

and protect neighboring flocks.

For more information about how to keep your flocks healthy, follow Defend the Flock on 

Facebook and Twitter and visit www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/defendtheflock.

Look for signs of illness: 

• Reduced energy or appetite

• Lower egg production; soft-shelled or

misshapen eggs

• Swelling of the head, eyelids, comb,

wattles, and shanks

• Purple discoloration of the wattles,

comb, and legs

• Difficulty breathing

• Runny nose, sneezing

• Twisting of the head and neck

• Stumbling or falling down

• Diarrhea

• Decreased activity

• Tremors

• Circling

• Complete stiffness
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

 

I, David W. Berry, ChiefFinancial Officer of DynTek Inc. certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of DynTek, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 19, 2007 | By:                     | /s/ David W. Berry |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|
|                    | David W. Berry          |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |                         |                    |  |

 

----
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

AgDiscovery Program

Last Modified: 

Print

AgDiscovery is a free summer outreach program to help teenagers explore careers

in agricultural sciences. As an AgDiscovery student, you’ll live on a college campus

for 2–4 weeks and learn from university professors and USDA experts—plant and

animal scientists, biotechnologists, veterinarians, wildlife biologists, administrative

professionals, and others.
You’ll gain hands-on experience through labs, workshops, and field trips; participate

in character- and team-building activities; and join in many other fun and

educational events. It’s a unique chance to get a first-hand look at the many exciting

career paths in agriculture.

AgDiscovery Brochure

AgDiscovery Program Offerings

AgDiscovery offers the following programs:

Agribusiness focuses on the business aspects of agriculture

Animal focuses on animal science and health

Combination incorporates animal, plant, and agribusiness disciplines

Plant focuses on plant health and science

Eligibility

To be eligible for the AgDiscovery Program, you must: 

Meet the university’s grade level requirement (see “Eligible Grades” on the

Participating Universities page). This criteria applies to your current grade

level.

Be available to attend the program in its entirety, including weekends and

opening and closing day activities. Please do not apply if you have other

commitments (i.e., summer camp, sports activities, summer employment, etc.)

which would prevent you from attending the entire program.

AgDiscovery Flyer (176.31 KB)

Learn More
Participating Universities

How Much Will It Cost?
How Do I Apply?
#### State v. Marshall

27694

12/13/2007

Denied

114 Hawai'i 396, 163 P.3d 199
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 1,
    2007
May 15, 1997

19166

#### Joya Lanakila Trust v. Hawai'i Omori Corp.

Affirmed
#### State v. Pascual

18501

9/30/97

Affirmed and Reversed in part
March 7, 2000

21637

#### State v. Pettigrew

Vacated and Remanded
tyme-ex106_304.htm



Exhibit 10.6

Tyme Technologies, Inc.

Amendment to 

Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement

This Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (the “Amendment”), dated ________, 2018 (the “Effective Date”) is made by and between Tyme Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and ____________  (the “Optionee”).

WHEREAS,  on May 24, 2018 (the “Date of Grant”), the Company, pursuant to the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), granted Optionee a nonqualified stock option (the “Option”) to purchase a total of _________ shares (the “Shares”) of the common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), of the Company, at the exercise price of $2.90 per Share (the “Exercise Price”), on the terms and conditions set forth in the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan Agreement, dated as of the Date of Grant (the “Prior Award”) 

WHEREAS, the Prior Award provided for a four year vesting schedule for the Option;

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to modify the Prior Award to provide the Optionee with a modified vesting schedule of the Option to reflect a three year Option vesting schedule;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Optionee hereby agree as follows:


	
1.
	
Amendment of Section 8. Section 8(a) of the Prior Award is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




(a)Except as otherwise provided herein, the Option shall become exercisable according to the following schedule, provided that the Optionee is employed by the Company on such date:

 


	
Date
	
Number of Shares

	
08/24/2018
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
11/24/2018
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
02/24/2019
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
05/24/2019
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
08/24/2018
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
11/24/2018
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
02/24/2019
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
05/24/2019
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
08/24/2018
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
11/24/2018
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
02/24/2019
	
1/12th of shares for each grant

	
05/24/2019
	
1/12th of shares for each grant






 


	
2.
	
Survival.  Except as modified hereby, the Prior Award continues in full force and effect, unmodified in any way. 





	
3.
	
Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same amendment.  




[Signature Page Follows]

 

 

2



 
 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement as of the date first written above.

 


	
Tyme Technologies, Inc.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 

	
 
	
Steve Hoffman

	
 
	
Chief Executive Officer




 


	
Optionee

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 

	
Name:
	
 




 

[Signature Page to Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Award]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0703 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEITH POPE,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 22 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 14 2024

08/14/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0703
# C_2016202EN.01034901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/349 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/349

---

37.   Declaration on Article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Without prejudice to the measures adopted by the Union to comply with its solidarity obligation towards a Member State which is the object of a terrorist attack or the victim of natural or man-made disaster, none of the provisions of Article 222 is intended to affect the right of another Member State to choose the most appropriate means to comply with its own solidarity obligation towards that Member State.

---