alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 20117 and # 20118; New York Disaster Number NY-20002]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of New York dated 12/01/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/09/2023 through 07/10/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 12/01/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/30/2024. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         9/03/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at 
                        *https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area, applications for disaster loans may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. *Primary Counties:*
                     Clinton The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375For Economic Injury:Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 201176 and for economic injury is 201180. The State which received an EIDL Declaration is New York. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-26895 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
# C_2018152EN.01002001.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/20

---

Action brought on 28 February 2018 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-164/18)

(2018/C 152/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (representatives: P. Ondrůšek, E. Sanfrutos Cano and G. von Rintelen, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt, by 18 April 2016, all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, (1) or, in any case, by failing to notify those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 51(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt, by 18 April 2016, all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, (1) or, in any case, by failing to notify those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 51(1) of that directive;

1

| — | Impose on the Kingdom of Spain, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU a daily penalty payment of EUR 61 964,32, with effect from the date of delivery of the judgment declaring the failure to fulfil the obligation to adopt or, in any case, notify to the Commission, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2014/23/EU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Impose on the Kingdom of Spain, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU a daily penalty payment of EUR 61 964,32, with effect from the date of delivery of the judgment declaring the failure to fulfil the obligation to adopt or, in any case, notify to the Commission, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2014/23/EU;

| — | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for adapting national law to Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ended on 18 April 2016.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (
  OJ 2014 L 94, p. 1).

1

OJ 2014 L 94, p. 1).

---
Adult

Bullet-shaped 

bodies 3/4 to 11/2

inches long

Shiny black with 

random white spots 

on the back

Eggs Larva(e) Pupa

Extremely long antennae 

11/2 to 21/2 times its body 

length, with distinctive 

black and white bands 

Six legs that 

are black or can 

appear bluish 

in color

LIFE CYCLE

Eggs

ASIAN 

LONGHORNED 

BEETLE

*Actual size of exit hole
WHAT TO LOOK FOR

• Adult beetles in the summer 

and early fall

• Round holes at least 

three-eighths of an inch 

in diameter 

• Pits on bark, chewed by the 

female beetle, where eggs are 

deposited

• Accumulation of sawdust-like 

material (insect waste) around 

base of tree or branches

• Dieback in tree canopy or 

unseasonable change in 

leaf color 

• Oozing sap from pits, 

especially on maple trees

THEHARM IT CAUSES

The Asian longhorned beetle disrupts the  ow of 

water and nutrients in a tree, from its roots to its leafy 

canopy. Once these pathways have been su ciently 

disrupted, the infested tree will die.

WHAT YOU CAN DO • Don’t move untreated  rewood —you could be 

moving the pest.

• Early detection is important; become familiar with 

the insect and its damage.

• Inspect trees regularly and report any signs or 

symptoms at HungryPests.com or by calling 

1-866-702-9938.

Round holes

Pits on bark

Dieback

Sawdust-like material

BACK

For more information visit: 

HUNGRYPESTS.COM

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

 Program Aid No. 2125-ALB Issued September 2012
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

126934 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 126934 

 COA: 247079 

Wayne CC: 01-012804-01 

ANDRE LEMAR JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

t0524 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 31, 2006 

Clerk
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43878

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

DEANGELO LAMAR HANKSTON ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 660

Filed: August 25, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Hon. Jon J. Shindurling , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of Oxycodone with the intent to deliver, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

______________________ __________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Deangelo Lamar Hankston pled guilty to possession of Oxycodone with the intent to

deliver , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(a)(1)(A) . In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge

and enhancement were dismissed. The district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years,

with a minimum period of confinemen t of two years

. Hankston appeals, contending that his

sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P .2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hankston ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29316]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

PLACE: CPSC's National Product Testing and Evaluation Center, 5 
Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matter To Be Considered: Decisional Matter: Phthalates--NPR.
    A live Web cast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live.

    Note: If there is a change in location of the meeting, we will 
post the location change on the CPSC Web site and on the CPSC Public 
Calendar as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours before the 
meeting time. Please check our Web site for possible change in 
location.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rockelle Hammond, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29316 Filed 12-10-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus

Last Modified: 

Print

Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) is a highly contagious and often fatal viral

disease of freshwater and saltwater fishes, including salmon, trout, yellow perch,

sunfish, walleye, and northern pike, among others. VHSV is listed as a pathogen by

the World Organisation for Animal Health.
APHIS follows World Organisation for Animal Health guidance for reporting VHSV

detections in the United States.

VHSV has four major genotypes (I, II, III and IV) and nine subtypes (Ia-e and IVa-IVd).

In the United States, subtypes IVa and IVb are most often detected. IVa is found in

susceptible wild and farm-raised fish species off the Pacific Coast. IVb is detected in

susceptible wild fish species from the Great Lakes region.

What To Look For

Most VHSV outbreaks occur in the spring when water temperatures are below 59 °F.

VHSV deaths rarely occur at temperatures above 64 °F.

VHSV-infected fish may show one or more of the following symptoms:

Hemorrhages on the body, eyes, gills, or the base of the fins

Bulging eyes

Swollen abdomens

Darkened coloration

Abnormal swimming behavior

In some cases, VHSV-infected fish won't show any signs of illness. They can still

spread the virus and infect other fish.

How To Prevent This Disease

VHSV usually spreads through the urine and reproductive fluids (ovarian fluids,

sperm) of infected fish. Fish can be exposed by direct contact with infected fish or

contaminated water.

Biosecurity Helps Prevent VHSV From Spreading

If you're a fish producer, here's what you can do:

Quarantine incoming fish.
Clean and disinfect equipment, vehicles, and footwear.

VHSV is susceptible to several disinfectants, including bleach and iodine

solutions.

Drain and clean boats, nets, and equipment before moving between locations.

Don't move fish, including baitfish, from one body of water to another.

Interstate Trade Restrictions

Some States require testing for VHSV for live fish entering from other States. To

check for requirements, contact the appropriate State animal health official.

How It Is Treated

There is no treatment for VHSV.

Report Signs of Animal Disease

Producers or owners who suspect an animal disease should contact their

veterinarian to evaluate the animal or herd. Find an accredited veterinarian.

Animal health professionals (veterinarians; diagnostic laboratories; public health,

zoo, or wildlife personnel; and others) report diagnosed or suspected cases of

nationally listed reportable animal diseases to APHIS District Offices and to the State

animal health official as applicable under State reporting regulations.
19345

#### Wieck v. Wilcox

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Emergency and Regulatory

Compliance Contacts

Last Modified: 

Print

Not sure who to contact? We can help!

Select an option from the list below.

I want to...

ask how to collaborate on emergency response in my region

ask about correspondence I received from IES

make a claim of property damage or personal injury where an APHIS employee

may have been at fault

ask about biological select agents and toxins that could threaten plant or

animal health

Emergency Support Function #11

Federal, State, local, Tribal, and Territorial emergency management personnel may

contact ESF #11 coordinators to address preparedness and response issues within

their region.

- Select a State - ▾
Loading...

Investigative and Enforcement Services (IES)

Investigative and Enforcement Services enforces the major laws APHIS operates

under.

IES Headquarters

Phone: 301-851-2948

Mailing Address:

4700 River Rd.

Unit 85

Riverdale, MD 20737

APHIS Tort Claims

APHIS processes claims against the Government under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

APHIS Tort Claims

Email: mrp.claims@usda.gov

Select Agents

APHIS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention jointly manage the

Federal Select Agent Program. APHIS regulates those agents that can cause disease

in plants or animals.

Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins

Email: dasat@usda.gov
Phone: 301-851-2070

Fax: 301-734-3652

Website

Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins

Website

Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins

Emergency and Regulatory Compliance Contacts
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:see attached
#### State v. Begley

20624

8/31/98

Affirmed
#### Patrick Allen FLEMING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-75-187.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 11, 1975.

Darryl F. Roberts, Ardmore, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Michael Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harold T. Gar-vin, Jr., Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Patrick Allen Fleming, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried before a jury and convicted in the District C.ourt of Carter County, Oklahoma, Case No. CRF-71-82 for the crime of Larceny of an Automobile. Punishment was assessed at a term of five (5) years under the direction and control of the Department of Corrections of the State of Oklahoma, and from said judgment and sentence the defendant has perfected his timely appeal.

The defendant’s sole contention urges that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing the Sheriff of Marshall County, Oklahoma, to testify concerning a prior offense committed by the defendant. Marshall County Sheriff James Splawn testified that he was the Sheriff of Marshall County during the months of March and April of 1971 and that the defendant was in his custody from March 18 to April 6, 1971. He further testified that the defendant escaped from the Marshall County Jail in Madill at approximately 6:00 p. m. on the 6th of April and that it was approximately 28 miles from Madill to Ardmore. The record further reflects that the vehicle was stolen at Ardmore between 7:30 and 8:00 p. m. on the 6th of April.

This Court has cited on numerous occasions the general rule that when a defendant is put on trial for one offense, he is to be convicted, if at all, by evidence which shows that he is guilty of that offense alone, and evidence of other crimes, committed either prior or subsequent to the offense for which he is on trial, is inadmissible. However, evidence of past offenses is admissible when it tends to prove motive and when it is a part of the res gestae. Pruitt v. State, Okl.Cr., 518 P.2d 1114; Moulton v. State, Okl.Cr., 476 P.2d 366 and Tillman v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 276, 169 P.2d 223.

In the instant case the testimony of Sheriff Splawn was admissible as a part of the res gestae and to show the motive of escape. Therefore, it is the opinion of this Court that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence the complained of testimony of Sheriff Splawn *988and defendant’s sole proposition in error is without merit.

The judgment and sentence appealed from should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
19709

#### Bank of Hawai'i v. Tin

Affirmed
27336

#### State v. Lee

Affirmed
18570

#### Loyalty Dev. Co. v. Kaminaka

Affirmed
OAR Box 1867 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

74) ll-B-128 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/2/2008 6:27:23 AM Sheet 74 of 95 

P.1 

. 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-128 

PENDING CONFIDENTIA 

The following information is located inV**are-Gon-t-i-cterrtTaj 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, November 1991, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Benzotrichloride. 19 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-128.
November 7, 2003

25315

#### State v. Brown

Affirmed
/**
 * @file
 * The Lazy-load behavior.
 */

(function (Drupal) {

  'use strict';

  Drupal.behaviors.lazy = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      var utils = {
        extend: function (obj, src) {
          Object.keys(src).forEach(function (key) {
            obj[key] = src[key];
          });
          return obj;
        },
        once: function (selector, context) {
          return (context || document).querySelector(selector);
        },
        loadScript: function (url) {
          if (document.querySelectorAll('script[src="' + url + '"]').length == 0) {
            var script = document.createElement('script'),
              scripts = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
            script.src = url;
            script.async = true;
            scripts.parentNode.insertBefore(script, scripts);
          }
        }
      };

      if (utils.once('body', context)) {
        var lazysizes = settings.lazy.lazysizes || {};

        if (!settings.lazy.preferNative) {
          // 1. Lazysizes configuration.
          window.lazySizesConfig = window.lazySizesConfig || {};
          window.lazySizesConfig = utils.extend(window.lazySizesConfig, lazysizes);
          // 2. Load all selected lazysizes plugins.
          if (!Object.entries) {
            Object.entries = function (obj) {
              var ownProps = Object.keys(obj),
                i = ownProps.length,
                resArray = new Array(i);
              while (i--) {
                resArray[i] = [ownProps[i], obj[ownProps[i]]];
              }
              return resArray;
            };
          }
          var min = settings.lazy.minified ? '.min' : '';
          Object.entries(lazysizes.plugins).forEach(function (path) {
            utils.loadScript(settings.lazy.libraryPath + '/plugins/' + path[1] + min + '.js');
          });
          // 3. Load the lazysizes library.
          utils.loadScript(settings.lazy.libraryPath + '/lazysizes' + min + '.js');
        }
      }
    }
  };

})(Drupal);
June 11, 2015

Mr. David Holt GPServ, Inc.

621 Brookhaven Drive Orlando, FL 32803

Dear Mr. Holt:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 26, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1914), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### State v. Burnett

17238

9/28/95

Affirmed
20011

#### Madriaga v. Four Seasons Hotels Ltd.

Affirmed