alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Honorable S
AUSTXN ~~.TExAs July 16, 1965
Clarence L. Darter opinionNO. C- 465

. CountyAttorney Chlldress County Childress,Texas Re: Whether a county may legally acquire,mainDear Mr. YOU tion: tarn and operate a translator system In order to provide television for entertainment and educational purposes for the citlzens of the county, if the qualifiedvoters of the county petition the Commissioners' Court to call an election for a bond Issue and special tax levy for the purpose of securing,malntainlng and operating the said translator Darter: system. have requested an opinion on the following ques- "Maya county legally acquire,maintain and operate a translator systemMorder to provide televls;on for entertainmentand educationalpurposes for the citizensof the county, If the qualified voters of the county petition the Commissioners' Court to call an election for a bond Issue and special tax levy for the purpose of securing,maintaining and operating the said translator system?" The Commissioners1Court Is a court of limited jurlsdiction and can only exercise such powers as are authorized by the Constitutionand Statutes of this State. Tex.Const., Art. V, Sec. 18; Bland v. Orr, 90 Tex. 492, 39 S.W. 558 (1897);El Paso County v. Elam, 106 S.W.2d 393 (Tex.Civ.App. 1937); Landman v. State, 97 S.W.2d 264 (Tex.Civ.App.1936, error ref.). -2219-Honorable ClarenceL. Darter, Page 2 (c-465 )

There is neither Constitutionalnor statutory authority for a county to acquire,maintain and operate a television translator system. There is neither constitutionalnor statutory authority for a Commissioners'Court to issue bonds for the purpose of securing,maintainingand operating a television translator system.

SUMMARY ------- A countyhas no authority to acquire, maintain and operate a television translator system. The Commissioners'Courthas no authority to issue bonds for the purpose of securing,maintaining and operating a television translator system. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General of Texas

RBJ:nr APPROVED: OPINION CGMMIl'TER W. V. Geppert, Chairman Dean Arrington J. Phillip Crawford John Pettlt Roger Tyler APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. Wright

-2220-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-11367-02-R6]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of final approval.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the State of Texas is revising its approved Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) program. Texas has adopted the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water rules for the Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) and Ground Water Rule (GWR). Therefore, EPA has approved these PWSS program revision packages following a public hearing period.

# DATES:

Decision for approval of Texas PWSS program revision is final on December 12, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        José G. Rodriguez, EPA Region 6, Drinking Water Section (6WD-DD) at 1201 Elm St, Dallas, TX 75270, or by telephone at                               ( print page 86135)                            (214) 665-8087, or by email at                         *Rodriguez.Jose@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 5, 2023, EPA published notice of tentative approval and solicitation of requests for public hearing (88 FR 69178). No timely or appropriate requests for public hearing were received within the 30-day period. Therefore, EPA issues final approval of the Texas PWSS program revisions effective on December 12, 2023.

*Authority:*                     Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended (1996), and 40 CFR part 142 of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.                

Dated: December 6, 2023.

Earthea Nance,

Regional Administrator, Region 6.

[FR Doc. 2023-27154 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Christopher R. Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Form 10-Q*”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

 
| May 5,   2011 |     |                       |
|--------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|               |     |                       |
|               | By:      | /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER |
|               |     | Christopher R. Gardner     |
| * *           | * * | *Chief Executive Officer*  |

 

I, Richard C. Yonker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Form 10-Q*”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.

 
| May 5,   2011 |     |                      |
|--------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|               |     |                      |
|               | By:      | /S/ RICHARD C. YONKER     |
|               |     | Richard C. Yonker         |
| * *           | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and will be retained by Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Annex 9

CHAPTER 10.9.INFECTION WITH NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS

Article 10.9.1.

General provisions

1)	For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, Newcastle disease (ND) is defined as an *infection* of *poultry* caused by Newcastle disease virus (NDV), which is an avian paramyxovirus serotype 1 (APMV-1) that meets one of the following criteria for virulence:

a)	the virus has an intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) in day-old chicks *(Gallus gallus)* of 0.7 or greater; or

b)	multiple basic amino acids have been demonstrated in the virus (either directly or by deduction) at the C-terminus of the F2 protein and phenylalanine at residue 117, which is the N-terminus of the F1 protein. The term ‘multiple basic amino acids’ refers to at least three arginine or lysine residues between residues 113 and 116. Failure to demonstrate the characteristic pattern of amino acid residues as described above would require characterisation of the isolated virus by an ICPI test.

In this definition, amino acid residues are numbered from the N-terminus of the amino acid sequence deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the F0 gene, 113–116 corresponds to residues –4 to –1 from the cleavage site.’

2)	*~~Poultry~~*~~is defined as ‘all domesticated birds, including backyard *poultry*, used for the production of *meat* or eggs for consumption, for the production of other commercial products, for restocking supplies of game, or for breeding these categories of birds, as well as fighting cocks used for any purpose’.~~

~~Birds that are kept in captivity for any reason other than those reasons referred to in the preceding paragraph, including those that are kept for shows, races, exhibitions, competitions, or for breeding or selling these categories of birds as well as pet birds, are not considered to be *poultry*.~~

~~3)~~	For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, the *incubation period* for ND shall be 21 days.

~~4~~3)	This chapter deals with NDV *infection* of *poultry*~~as defined in point 2 above~~ in the presence or absence of clinical signs.

~~5~~4)	The occurrence of *infection* with NDV is defined as the isolation and identification of NDV as such or the detection of viral ribonucleic acid specific for NDV.

~~6~~5)	A Member Country should not impose bans on the trade in *poultry commodities* in response to information on the presence of any APMV-1 in birds other than *poultry*, including *wild* birds.

~~7~~6)	Standards for diagnostic tests, including pathogenicity testing, are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*. When the use of ND vaccines is appropriate, those vaccines should comply with the standards described in the *Terrestrial Manual*.

[...]

___________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2022*1
# C_2018311EN.01001001.xml

| 3.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 28 June 2018 — FR v Ministero dell’interno — Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale presso la Prefettura U.T.G. di Milano

(Case C-422/18)

(2018/C 311/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FR

Defendant: Ministero dell’interno — Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della protezione internazionale presso la Prefettura U.T.G. di Milano

Question referred

Are the principles of sincere cooperation and of the equivalence and effectiveness of judicial protection, referred to in Articles 4(3) TEU and 19(1) TEU, Article 47, first and second paragraphs, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Directive 2013/32/EU (1) (in particular, Articles 22 and 46), to be interpreted in the sense that (a) European Union law requires that, where national law provides for a right of appeal in proceedings concerning the rejection of an application for the grant of international protection, such an appeal should automatically have suspensory effect, and that (b) those principles preclude a procedure, such as that under Italian law (Article 35a(13) of Legislative Decree 25/2008, as amended by Legislative Decree 13/17, converted into Law No 46/17), under which the court seised by an asylum applicant — one whose application for asylum has been rejected by the competent administrative authority and by a court of first instance — is permitted to dismiss an application for the suspension of the adverse decision solely on the basis of the validity of the grounds of the appeal brought against that decision, where that decision has been given by the same court as is asked to rule on the suspension thereof, without any consideration of the risk of serious and irreparable harm?

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

---
EXHIBIT 32.0

                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 CERTIFICATIONS



                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






I, James A.  Cannavino,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Direct  Insite Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that::

(1)  The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the  Company for the three  months
     ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: May 18, 2005



                                        /s/ James A. Cannavino
                                            ------------------------------
                                            James A. Cannavino
                                            Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>


                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






I, Michael J.  Beecher,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Direct  Insite Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that::

(1)  The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the  Company for the three  months
     ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934); and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: May 18, 2005



                                        /s/ Michael J. Beecher
                                            -------------------------
                                            Michael J. Beecher
                                            Chief Financial Officer
State and County Fee 

Remittance Worksheet

1. State or County entity name

_

14. Bank Account Number

15. Bank Name

Checking Account

Savings Account

This information may be either e-mailed or faxed to : 

Email: Christian Dellis (Christian.B.Dellis@aphis.usda.gov) or Marcus McElvaine (Marcus.McElvaine@aphis.usda.gov) 

or 

FAX: 301-734-7639 (Attention Christian Dellis or Marcus McElvaine)

11. Federal Identification Number

10. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number

Yes

No

12. In the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) system?

9. Fax Number

8. Phone Number

7. Email

4. City 6. Zip Code

3. Address

2. Primary Contact Name

 Initial Update

16. Signature 

(Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Weights and Measures, etc.)

 5. State

13. Bank Routing Number

Privacy Act Statement: Collection of this information is authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3332(g), 3325(d), and 7701(c). The information will be used by the Government to make 

payments by electronic funds to a vendor. This information may also be used for income reporting and for collecting and reporting any delinquent amounts arising 

out of a vendor’s relationship with the Government. Disclosure of the information by the vendor is mandatory. Failure to provide the requested information may 

result in the delay or withholding of payments to the vendor.

Date

Note: Please ensure the DUNS number above is valid and active before submission.
2


EXHIBIT 23.1

November 21, 1997

General Nutrition Companies, Inc.
300 Sixth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15222

Dear Sirs:

We  have  made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the
unaudited  interim  financial information  of  General  Nutrition
Companies,  Inc. and subsidiaries for the twelve  and  thirty-six
weeks  ended October 11, 1997 and October 12, 1996, as  indicated
in our report dated November 15, 1997; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We  are  aware  that  our report referred  to  above,  which  was
included  in  your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter
ended   October  11,  1997,  is  incorporated  by  reference   in
Registration  Statement Nos. 33-58096, 33-68590,  33-93370,  333-
00128 and 333-21397 on Form S-8.

We  also  are  aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant  to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a
part  of the Registration Statement prepared or certified  by  an
accountant  or  a report prepared or certified by  an  accountant
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Yours truly,


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
June 12, 2008

28575

#### State v. Cantiberos

Affirmed
#### State v. Cargill.

16704

12/26/96

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          388,770
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   11,563,591
<ALLOWANCES>                    828,563
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,957,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           947,943
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      11,009,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,957,239
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,663,245
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   242,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                329,057
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              182,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 909,581
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             909,581
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    909,581
<EPS-BASIC>                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1999
<CASH>                                       1,026,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  491,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    286,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,822,713
<PP&E>                                         664,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 388,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,247,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          873,208
<BONDS>                                        448,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,796,893
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,797)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,247,193
<SALES>                                      3,621,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,621,533
<CGS>                                        2,388,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,469,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
#### Mannie Feder, Doing Business as Beam Music Co., Respondent, *v.*Frank Caliguira, Doing Business as Frank’s Pizzeria and Restaurant, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

April 27, 1959.

Jesse *B. Hecht*for appellant.

*Bernstein S Bernstein (Charles E. Bernstein*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The contract herein involved for the hiring of a coin-operated phonograph comes within the purview of section 399 of the General Business Law. The automatic renewal clause was rendered inoperative by reason of plaintiff’s failure to give the notice required by this section. (See *Melodies, Inc.*v. *La Pierre,*4 A D 2d 982; *Peerless Towel Supply Co.*v. *Triton Press,*3 A D 2d 249; *Archer*v. *Equitable Life Assur. Soc.,*218 N. Y. 18; *Matter of New York Post*v. *Liebowitz, 2 N*Y 2d 677.)

The order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs, and motion denied. Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment unanimously reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Operational Activities: Aquaculture

Last Modified: 

Print

Wildlife Services (WS) provides the Federal leadership and expertise to resolve

wildlife conflicts that threaten the Nation's agricultural resources. WS has a presence

in every State where its wildlife biologists and technicians work to protect

agricultural crops and aquaculture from damage caused by wild animals.

Aquaculture is an important industry in the United States; however, wildlife

depredation, especially by fish-eating birds, is significantly impacting production. In

2003, the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) surveyed producers from 13

States dominating the catfish industry. Nearly 70% of catfish producers reported

some losses to wildlife. In 2006, WS research confirmed that catfish producers lost

$10-13 million annually to double-crested cormorants in Mississippi alone.

In FY 2008, WS provided wildlife damage management assistance to aquaculture

producers in 14 States. This included assistance to anglers, baitfish and crawfish

producers, catfish farmers, fish hatcheries, sport fish producers for pond stocking,

and tropical fish producers.

Aquaculture Research at WS' National Wildlife Research Center 

Depredation Orders for Double-crested Cormorants