alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of XATA Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
 December 22, 2005Signature:
    
    /s/ Mark E. TiesName:
    
    Mark E. TiesPrint Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Legacy Petition Process

Last Modified: 

Print

The petition process was discontinued on October 1, 2021. See below for links to the

petition table and petition resources. 

Under the legacy rule, developers could submit a petition requesting an agency

determination that a plant developed using a plant pest is unlikely to pose a plant

pest risk, and therefore, is no longer subject to APHIS’ biotechnology regulations.

Under the revised rule, developers have the option of requesting a permit or a

regulatory status review (RSR) of a plant developed using genetic engineering that

has not been previously reviewed and determined to be nonregulated.

Legacy Petition Guidance and Resources

Guidance for Submitting a Petition (pdf) (701.77 KB)

Guidance on Requests for Extensions of Nonregulated Status (162.89 KB)

Table of petitions for determination of nonregulated status

Additional Resources

Learn More About the RSR Process

Learn More About the Revised Regulations
January 26, 1999

21323

#### State v. Freitas

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 302 

Observing the 100th birthday of the late Les Paul, the ‘‘Wizard of 

Waukesha’’, and honoring his contributions to the American music industry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2015 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Observing the 100th birthday of the late Les Paul, the 

‘‘Wizard of Waukesha’’, and honoring his contributions 

to the American music industry. 

Whereas Les Paul was born on June 9, 1915, in Waukesha, 

Wisconsin, and June 9, 2015, marks the centennial day 

of his birth; 

Whereas Les Paul served in the Armed Forces Radio Network during World War II; 

Whereas Les Paul is acknowledged for his contributions leading to the solid-body electric guitar, and a number of innovative sound-recording techniques; and 

Whereas Les Paul is a member of both the Rock and Roll 

Hall of Fame and the National Inventors Hall of Fame: 

Now, therefore, be it 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 302 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and celebrates the 100th birth3 day of Les Paul; and 

4 (2) commemorates his contributions to Amer5 ican society as a gifted musician, inventor, and mu6 sical pioneer. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 602 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 602

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 4, 2016.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Guinta, to rank immediately after Mr. Stutzman; 
and Mr. Johnson of Ohio.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Bost.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamie B. Morton, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, motion granted, and new trial granted. Memorandum: County Court, after a hearing, suppressed oral statements made by defendant to police prior to administration of *Miranda*warnings, but denied defendant’s motion to suppress oral and written statements made after the warnings were given. Custodial interrogation of defendant was continuous, punctuated only by administration of the warnings. Because there was no pronounced break between the pre- and *post-Miranda*statements, the court erred in failing to suppress all of the statements given by defendant to the police *(see, People v Bethea,*67 NY2d 364; *People v Chapple,*38 NY2d 112; *People v Graves,*158 AD2d 916, *lv denied*76 NY2d 735). The error was not harmless, particularly in light of the prosecution’s reliance upon the videotaped statement to rebut defendant’s insanity defense *(see, People v DeGelleke,*144 AD2d 978, *lv denied*73 NY2d 920).

County Court also erred by instructing the jury, absent a request from defendant, that no inference should be drawn from defendant’s failure to testify *(see, People v Koberstein,*66 NY2d 989; *People v Smith,*170 AD2d 1040). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Chronic Wasting Disease

Management and Response Funding

Opportunities

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS provides millions of dollars each year to State and Tribal governments,

universities, and others to control chronic wasting disease (CWD) in wild and farmed

cervids, such as deer and elk.

Funded projects address CWD research, management, and response activities. They

support one or more priorities:

Improving management of CWD-affected farmed and wild cervid populations

Improving management of CWD-affected areas or premises

Researching amplification assays and other new test methods

Researching the application of or implementing a whole genome predictive

genetics CWD management plan for farmed cervid herds

Developing and delivering educational materials or programs

Find specific information about CWD in farmed cervids and wild cervids.

Open CWD Funding Opportunities
No hay oportunidades abiertas en este momento. Vuelva pronto o regístrese para

recibir correos electrónicos sobre oportunidades futuras.

Ver mas Ver Menos

Sign up for email updates

How To Apply for APHIS Funding: Getting Started 

Guidelines for Using Funds 

Grants and Cooperative Agreements 

Accomplishments and Funded Projects To Fight

Chronic Wasting Disease

APHIS has invested over $29 million for projects to research, manage, and respond

to CWD. For details, view our lists and summaries of funded projects below.

Farmed Cervid

2023 Spending Plan: Farmed Cervid CWD Management and Response Activities

(167.84 KB)

2022 Spending Plan: Farmed Cervid CWD Management and Response Activities

(216.43 KB)

2022 Project Executive Summaries: Farmed Cervid CWD Management and

Response Activities (344.77 KB)

2021 Spending Plan: Farmed Cervid CWD Management and Response Activities

(199.06 KB)

Wild Cervid

2023 Spending Plan: Wild Cervid CWD Management and Response Activities

(222.6 KB)

2022 Spending Plan: Wild Cervid CWD Management and Response Activities

(198.06 KB)

2021 Spending Plan: Wild Cervid CWD Management and Response Activities

(200.28 KB)

2021 Project Executive Summaries: Wild Cervid CWD Management and

Response Activities (315.51 KB)
Tribal Nations Wild Cervid

2023 Spending Plan: Tribal Nations Wild Cervid CWD Opportunities (151.96 KB)

2022 Spending Plan: Tribal Nations Wild Cervid CWD Opportunities (180.88 KB)

2021 Spending Plan: Tribal Nations Wild Cervid CWD Opportunities (225.69 KB)

2021 Project Executive Summaries: Tribal Nations Wild Cervid CWD

Opportunities (215.55 KB)

Contact Us

If you have questions about applying for farmed cervid funding opportunities, email

us at vs.sp.cervid.health@usda.gov.

For questions about wild cervid funding opportunities, email us at aphisws.cwd_agreements@usda.gov.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. George Thomas PAIGE, Durwood Ray Burgess, and James Arthur Starke, Appellants.

No. 8953.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Sept. 24, 1963.

Decided Oct. 17, 1963.

Robert M. Harcourt, Norfolk, Va., for appellant Durwood Ray Burgess.

Roger T. Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty. (C. V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and NORTHROP, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Convicted, with others, of the unlawful removal, concealment and possession of 110 gallons of distilled spirits in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205(a) (2), 5601 (a) (12), and 5604(a) (1), Durwood Ray Burgess appeals on the ground that the evidence did not establish his guilt. We think his motion for a judgment of acquittal should have been granted. A recital of the evidence will disclose that Burgess, while present, was not proved to be a participant in the commission of the offense for which he was tried.

Treasury Department agents maintained a watch upon the home of George Thomas Paige, a co-defendant, in Newport News, Virginia on the night of June 1, 1962. About 8:50 o’clock Paige came out of the house and opened the gate across his driveway as well as one of the front doors of his garage. In a few minutes Paige came out again, walked to the abutting street and looked both ways. At 10 o’clock Burgess and James Arthur Starke, another defendant, came to the house. Paige admitted them and put out the porch and living room lights. A half hour later an automobile drove into the garage. Immediately Burgess and Starke came out of the front door and Paige the back door, and all three proceeded to the garage.

At this moment the Treasury agents approached, shining their flash lights and identifying themselves as Federal officials. Burgess, pausing for a second in an unsuccessful effort to close one of the garage doors, fled with the others. All were shortly apprehended. The automobile contained 110 gallons of illicit whiskey. Paige and Starke were indicted, tried and convicted with Burgess. While they seasonably filed notices of appeal, neither Paige nor Starke have perfected their appeals.

Mere presence at the perpetration of a crime is not criminal. Burgess’ flight may, of course, be taken to evince his consciousness of guilt. Vick *32v. United States, 216 F.2d 228, 232 (5 Cir. 1954). But, quite conceivably, other reasons may have prompted him to run. Such a reaction thus might not be inconsistent with innocence. Presence and flight in the circumstances here could not alone prove him particeps criminis beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment of conviction will be reversed and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to enter a judgment of acquittal. At the same time, on the motion of the United States, we dismiss the appeals of Paige and Starke.

Reversed and remanded.
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 0496 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 101 -AD
#### State v. Ugalde

21002

1/14/99

Affirmed in part & Reversed in part
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2057

___________

Fen Hao Chen, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., *

Attorney General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: October 5, 2010

Filed: October 20, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Chinese citizen Fen Hao Chen petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After

careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Li Yun Lin

v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1164, 1165-66 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (standard of

review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Pathogens FAQs

Last Modified: 

Print

I am leaving for Australia next week to collect

samples. Can I have a permit expedited?

No, we do not expedite permits because so many applicants want their permits

expedited, it would cause a backlog of the other permits.

I need my permit right away. Can I skip the State

review?

No, we have an agreement with the States that they may review and provide input

on PPQ 526 Permits. The State review is an important part of the evaluation process.

I already have a PPQ 526 Permit. I need to move

to a laboratory in a different location. Do I need a

new permit to work with the plant pest in the new

location?

Yes, you will need to apply for a new permit, because PPQ 526 Permits are address

specific.
Someone in our company has the PPQ 526 Permit

in their name. They are leaving the company. Can

I change the permit to my name?

A transfer of ownership can be made only if the current permit holder and the new

permit holder are both eAuthenticated. The current permit holder should log in to

APHIS eFile and submit a transfer of ownership request for the permit. You must

provide the new permit holder’s name, email address, and telephone number. For

assistance, refer to the How to Transfer Your PPQ Permit (510.57 KB) guidance

document. 

I need to have a change made on my permit. How

can I have it amended?

If you are eAuthenticated you can submit an amendment application online. If you

are not eAuthenticated you must send us an amendment request in writing (email,

fax, or letter). Some changes can be made by amending the permit, but not all. If

you need to change the destination address, for instance, you will have to apply for

a new permit.

My permit has expired and I did not realize it. I

still need to continue my research. What should I

do?

You must apply for a new PPQ 526 Permit. Please note that most of the permits state

that pests kept under the permit shall be destroyed at the completion of the

intended use and not later than the expiration date, unless an extension is granted

by this issuing office. In some cases, you may be able to continue using your

cultures while your new permit is pending.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 409 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to exclude certain 

organizations from the definition of earmark. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Mr. FATTAH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

exclude certain organizations from the definition of earmark. 

1 Resolved, That clause 9(e) of rule XXI of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by adding at 

3 the end the following: ‘‘Such term shall not include a pro4 vision or report language providing, authorizing or recom5 mending any such specific amount to an entity that is— 

6 ‘‘(1) a non-profit corporation that is (or has 

7 any subsidiary that is) a federally chartered corpora8 tion; and 

9 ‘‘(2) determined by the chair, in consultation 

10 with the ranking member, of the Committee on ApVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:05 Sep 09, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR409.IH HR409

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 409 IH 

1 propriations to have main focus on character devel2 opment, mentoring, education, or training of individ3 uals who have not attained 19 years of age.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Chapter 2.4.4. – Infection with Marteilia refringens

Annex 20. Item 6.5.3. – Article 10.4.3. of Chapter 10.4. ‘Infection with ISAV’

CHAPTER 10.4.

INFECTION WITH INFECTIOUS SALMON ANAEMIA VIRUS

[...]

Article 10.4.3.

Measures for the importation or transit of aquatic animal products for any purpose regardless of the infection with ISAV status of the exporting country, zone or compartment

In this article, all statements referring to ISAV include HPR deleted ISAV and HPR0 ISAV.

The *aquatic animal products*listed below have been assessed as meeting the criteria for safety of *aquatic animal****products*in accordance with Article 5.4.1. When authorising the importation or transit of these *aquatic animal products*, *Competent Authorities*should not require any *sanitary measures*related to ISAV, regardless of the ISAV status of the *exporting country*, *zone*or *compartment*:

1)	*aquatic animal products*that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 56°C for at least five minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates ISAV;

~~2)~~~~mechanically dried eviscerated fish that have been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 56°C for at least five minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates ISAV;~~

~~3~~2)	fish *meal*that has been subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to attain a core temperature of at least 56°C for at least five minutes, or a time/temperature equivalent that inactivates ISAV;

~~4~~3)	fish oil;

~~5~~4)	fish skin leather.

[...]

____________

WOAH *Aquatic Manual* 2025	8
June 14, 2000

22462

#### Beecham v. Hawaii Employment Sec. Agency

Affirmed
1 

10/24/2018

NAHLN Program Organization and Administration

Under the network structure illustrated below, two USDA agencies oversee and administer the NAHLN 

program. APHIS oversees the administration of the operational activities; the National Institute for Food 

and Agriculture (NIFA) supports infrastructure and personnel enhancements at State and university 

laboratories through a cooperative agreement funding mechanism. Both agencies measure and report

NAHLN activities to USDA, provide both capacity-building for laboratory infrastructure and personnel at 

State laboratories and participate in the Executive Committee. 

NAHLN Program

Office

NAHLN 

Coordinator

NVSL 

Director

VS Deputy 

Administrator

NAHLN Programmatic Structure

APHIS Operational Structure

NAHLN Program 

Office Functions

• Manage APHIS 

funding for NAHLN 

activities in state labs

• Conduct QA audits

• Administer NAHLN 

laboratory 

membership

• Manage NAHLN Portal 

• Coordinate and 

provide training to 

NAHLN labs for quality 

management systems, 

NAHLN Portal use and 

disease assays

• Provide standardized 

testing protocols to 

approved NAHLN labs

• Assists NAHLN 

laboratories with 

maintaining shipping

permits

VS Deputy Administrator, 

NIFA Associate Director

NAHLN Executive

Committee

NAHLN Coordinating 

Council

NAHLN Working Groups

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

MEMBERSHIP

APHIS-VS D & B ADA

APHIS-VS NVSL Director

APHIS-VS NAHLN Coordinator

NIFA Animal Systems Director 

NIFA NPL, Animal Biosecurity

COORDINATING COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP

APHIS-VS D & B ADA

APHIS-VS NVSL Director

APHIS-VS NAHLN Coordinator

APHIS-VS NAHLN Associate Coordinators

NIFA Animal Systems Director

NIFA NPL, Veterinary Science

NIFA NPL, Animal Biosecurity

NAHLN Laboratory Directors (9)

State Veterinarians (4)

WORKING GROUP MEMBERSHIP

NAHLN Laboratory technical experts

NAHLN Program Office Staff

NVSL Reference Laboratory Staff

State + 

University Labs

NVSL Reference 

Labs

NAHLN NETWORK

VS Program 

Staff

NVSL 

D & B Associate

Deputy 

Administrator
19151

#### State v. Pitt

Affirmed
#### Rason Asphalt, Inc., Judgment Creditor, *v.*George J. Craven et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Jorge Company, Judgment Debtors. Comptroller of the State of New York, Third Party.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

February 19, 1959.

*117*Robert M. Blaheman*for judgment creditor.

*Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General,*for third party.

*De Graff, Foy, Conway é Eolt-Harris*for Standard Accident Insurance Company appearing specially.

Donald S. Taylob, J.

In proceedings supplementary to judgment pursuant to article 45 of the Civil Practice Act the judgment creditor applies for an order directing the Comptroller of the State of New York to pay it $8,159.75 out of funds due on public improvement contracts of the judgment debtors with public authorities of the State of New York. The director of office audit of the New York State Department of Audit and Control by affidavit states that “subject to any increase or decrease that may be made by supplemental agreement” the balance due on three contracts subject to the third-party subpoena served in conjunction herewith is $144,297.40. In the answering affidavit of the Attorney-General it is alleged that prior to the institution of this proceeding mechanic’s liens for labor and material were filed with the Comptroller which total $220,502.88. It appears that none of these lienors has been made a party to this application. The Standard Accident Insurance Company which is listed as an “ all moneys assignment ” lienor has appeared specially and objects to the jurisdiction of the court for failure to serve the lienors, including itself, with notice of this proceeding.

Nothing in the moving papers indicates the genesis of the judgment creditor’s claim, i.e., whether or not it arose out of the public improvement against which the funds are held. It is not listed among the lienors itemized in the Attorney-General’s affidavit. Under these circumstances their rights are superior to those of the judgment creditor which has not disputed either the existence or the amounts of the liens. (Lien Law, § 25-a; *Matter of Gombert*v. *Fuller Contr. Co.,*285 App. Div. 1053; *Cronford Co.*v. *Leopold <& Co.,*189 Misc. 388, affd. 273 App. Div. 754, affd. 298 N. Y. 676; *Matter of United States Cas. Co.*v. *Met Contr. Corp.,*11 Misc 2d 492.)

Accordingly, the motion is denied and the stay contained in the subpoena is vacated.

Submit order.