alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Confirmations of Highly Pathogenic

Avian Influenza in Commercial and

Backyard Flocks

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS confirmed highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in a commercial flock in

the United States on February 8, 2022. Since then, we have worked swiftly to
identify and respond to detections and mitigate the virus’ impact on U.S. poultry

production and trade. 

Detections are higher in the fall and spring, because we continue to see wild birds

spreading virus as they migrate to their seasonal homes. APHIS continues to work

closely with State animal health officials on surveillance efforts to look for the virus

in commercial, backyard, and wild birds. We also continue to encourage all bird

owners to practice strong biosecurity—that means reducing opportunities for wildlife

to spread the virus to their birds and preventing the spread of the virus from one

premises to another.

To provide context on the overall size of the U.S. poultry flock, there are more than

368.2 million egg-laying chickens in the United States. In 2022, more than 9.5 billion

broiler chickens and 208 million turkeys were processed in the United States (data

from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service).

Confirmed HPAI Detections

The dashboard below is designed to provide a current snapshot of confirmed HPAI

detections in the United States. While it also includes summary data compiled since

the outbreak began, looking at cases confirmed over the last 30 days provides the

best picture of how the virus is currently impacting U.S. birds. We expect the

number of cases to ebb and flow as the levels of virus continues to change in

different areas based on wild bird movement.

Related Links

Avian Influenza

Detections of HPAI in Wild Birds

Detections of HPAI in Mammals
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 603 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 603

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 4, 2016.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, ranked as 
follows on the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Takai, after Mrs. Lawrence; and Ms. Adams, 
after Ms. Clarke of New York.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.10

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.(required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)

In connection with the report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of CILCORP Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 9, 2004

| |  | /s/ Warner L. Baxter
Warner L. BaxterExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

MICHAEL HOWARD MARKS, 

 Respondent 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2185 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 80 DB 2015 

Attorney Registration No. 30286 

(Allegheny County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated June 19, 

2015, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby GRANTED 

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 215(g), and it is 

 ORDERED that Michael Howard Marks is suspended on consent from the 

practice of law for a period of eighteen months, the suspension is stayed in its entirety 

and he is placed on probation for a period of eighteen months, subject to the following 

conditions: 

1. Respondent shall continue treatment with Susan Atkinson, PhD, or 

another similarly qualified mental healthcare professional, who is to direct 

and supervise his activities; 

2. Respondent shall cooperate with directions of the mental healthcare 

professional supervising his treatment, take medications as prescribed and 

engage in therapy and counseling as directed; 
3. Respondent shall file quarterly written reports with the Secretary of the 

Board and shall attach reports verifying the above counseling and treatment; 

and 

4. Respondent shall file quarterly reports with the Office of Disciplinary 

Counsel attesting to his continued compliance with Rule of Professional 

Conduct 1.15 (relating to safekeeping property).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00399-CV

In the Interest of D. M., A Child,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-02386

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against Appellant in relation to this 

appeal because she qualifies as indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED November 24, 2014.

_______________________________

Karen Angelini
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the "Company") on
FORM  10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Zaremba,
Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.

/s/ Richard Zaremba
-------------------
Richard Zaremba
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
November 6, 2003




A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained
by  MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
Order entered Septe mber 23 , 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00728

- CV

IN RE JAY SANDON COO PER, Relator

O riginal Proceeding from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

ORDER

Before Justices Whitehill, Pedersen, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s amended

petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 586 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 586

Expressing support for designation of the fourth week in May as ``DIPG 
  Awareness Week'' to raise awareness and encourage the research into 
cures for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and pediatric cancers 
                              in general.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2016

 Mr. Knight (for himself, Ms. Speier, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
    Chabot, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Cardenas, and Mr. Conyers) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for designation of the fourth week in May as ``DIPG 
  Awareness Week'' to raise awareness and encourage the research into 
cures for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and pediatric cancers 
                              in general.

Whereas diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) affects 200 to 400 children in 
        the United States each year;
Whereas brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related death in children;
Whereas DIPG is the second most common malignant brain tumor of childhood;
Whereas DIPG is the leading cause of childhood death due to brain tumors;
Whereas the median survival is only 9 months;
Whereas 5-year survival is less than 1 percent;
Whereas given the age at diagnosis and the average life expectancy, the number 
        of life years lost annually because of DIPG is approximately 25,000 
        years of person life lost (calculated as the number of children 
        diagnosed by average of male and female life expectancy from that median 
        age, 300  x  80 = 25,000 years of person life lost annually); and
Whereas prognosis has not improved for children with DIPG in over 35 years: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``DIPG Awareness Week'';
            (2) encourages all people of the United States to become 
        more informed about diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and 
        pediatric brain cancer;
            (3) supports expanded research to better understand DIPG, 
        develop effective treatments, and provide comprehensive care 
        for children with DIPG and their families; and
            (4) encourages the NCI and other research funders to 
        elevate their consideration of mortality rate of a type of 
        cancer as well as the life years lost as factors considered 
        during the grant application process.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                In connection with the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R. Tauscher, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

                (1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                (2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

                In connection with the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G. Thomasch, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

                (1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                (2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | James G. Thomasch       |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### State v. Dobson

22495

03/07/2000

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Electronic Forms

Last Modified: 

Print

Many of our forms are now available online to better serve our stakeholders,

cooperators, customers, and employees. This page provides access to forms

essential to accomplishing our mission and necessary for agency operations. 

We are working to ensure all mission area and agency forms comply with Section

508 of the Rehabilitation Act. If you need a form that is not accessible, please send

an email to APHISweb@usda.gov. We will make every effort to obtain an accessible

copy for you. 

USDA, MRP, and APHIS Forms

Animal Care Forms

Departmental Forms

APHIS Forms

Human Resources Forms

International Services Forms

Marketing and Regulatory Programs Forms

Plant Protection and Quarantine Forms

Veterinary Services Forms

Wildlife Services Forms
Other Federal Agency Forms

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

General Services Administration Forms

Office of Personnel Management Forms

Treasury Department Forms (Savings Bonds)

Thrift Savings Plan Forms
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           162,994
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 162,994
<CASH>                                          (1,809)
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              29,167
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          11,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,665
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                110,089
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             80,906
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 26,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,625
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,665
<PREMIUMS>                                      78,029
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,497
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 444
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   6,369
<BENEFITS>                                      68,040
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     18,926
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,574
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  92,205
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             68,040
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              26,473
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                42,661
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 91,111
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: Ex parte communications, U.S. Department of Energy

FROM: Timothy Ballo, Earthjustice

DATE: June 18, 2013

RE: Efficiency Advocates’ Ex Parte Communication with DOE on June 11, 2013

Meeting/Teleconference summary

Attendees:

Timothy Ballo – Earthjustice

Dan Cohen – DOE

John Cymbalsky – DOE

Ben Longstreth – Natural Resources Defense Council

Steve Nadel – American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy

Roland Risser – DOE

Robin Roy – Natural Resources Defense Council

Harvey Sachs – American Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy

Charlie Stephens – Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

Issues Discussed:

The attendees identified above met on June 11, 2013, to discuss DOE’s proposed rulemaking to

allow waivers from energy conservation standards for large (>55 gallon) residential electric

storage water heaters used in demand response and thermal energy storage programs (Docket

No. EERE‐2012‐BT‐STD‐0022). The efficiency advocates expressed concern that the proposed

rule does not meet the Department’s legal obligations and does not provide any analysis of the

impact of allowing waivers. In addition, efficiency advocates specifically addressed the

following:

• The need for DOE to analyze the consumer, energy, and environmental effects of any

proposed waivers;

• The ability of well‐controlled “hybrid” (with resistance elements for back‐up and/or higher

temperature operation) heat pump water heaters to serve energy thermal storage applications

without the need for a waiver from energy conservation standards;

• The effectiveness of heat pump water heaters in cold climates; and

• The potential for Congress to take action to address the waiver issue.

In response to a question from the Department, the advocates also suggested possible

benchmarks for a limited waiver program, without conceding that such a program would be

warranted or lawful. To provide a more complete response, the American Council for an 
Energy Efficient Economy is providing with this memo its brief supplemental comments on this 

topic and an accompanying spreadsheet.

Finally, the efficiency advocates informed DOE of the possibility that one or more of the

advocates may subsequently file, jointly with other interested stakeholders, supplemental

comments recommending further analyses and/or procedural safeguards that would be most

helpful in addressing the commenters’ concerns.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,410,330
<SECURITIES>                                    35,307
<RECEIVABLES>                                  981,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,051,703
<PP&E>                                      10,767,530
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,131,786)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,755,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          890,377
<BONDS>                                        595,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,269,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,755,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,740,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               722,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                992,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            992,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   992,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.7


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(this “Amendment”) is dated May 1, 2018, by and between Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), and James D. Meier (“Employee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered
into that certain Employment Agreement dated July 19, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to make a
clarifying amendment to the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.           The
second sentence of Section 5(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“In such case, Employer shall pay the Annual Salary
to Employee for a twelve month period following termination of employment plus a pro rata performance bonus and accrued but unused
vacation as of the date of termination. If Employee timely elects continuation coverage pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1986, as amended (“COBRA”) for Employee and his eligible dependents the Company will monthly
reimburse Employee for the COBRA premiums for such coverage for twelve months from the date of termination (the “Continuation
Benefit”).”


 


2.          The
second sentence of Section 5(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“In the event of such a termination, Employer shall
pay to Employee in a lump sum (i) an amount equal to twelve months Annual Salary, (ii) a pro rata performance bonus and (iii) accrued
but unused vacation as of the date of termination. In addition, Employee will be entitled to the Continuation Benefit.”


 


3.          All
other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in effect.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	THE COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	NEVADA GOLD & CASINOS, INC.
	 	 
	 	BY: 	           
	 	 
	 	EMPLOYEE:
	 	 
	 	 
	 	James D. Meier