alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and
Related Prospectuses (Forms S-3 No. 333-84402, No. 333-42245; and Forms S-8 No.
333-95282, No. 333-3438, No. 333-26135, No. 333-44281, No. 333-50679, No.
333-76991, No. 333-33944, No. 333-56800, No. 333-84404, and No. 333-101378) of
our report dated October 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2002.


                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
December 18, 2002
# C_2019082EN.01001301.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Erding (Germany) lodged on 10 December 2018 — U.B. and T.V. v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-776/18)

(2019/C 82/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Erding

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: U.B., T.V.

Defendant: Eurowings GmbH

Question referred

In the event of a cancellation within the meaning of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, (1) is it to be assumed that there has been an offer to re-route allowing passengers to reach their final destination no more than two hours after their scheduled time of arrival also in the case where replacement transportation is provided to an airport other than that named in the booking confirmation, if that other airport is located in the same region?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
(USDA)—Imagínese no tener

jarabe de arce para los panqueques o jugo de naranja para el

desayuno. O no poder relajarse

bajo la sombra de un fresno con

una copa de vino de California.

Las plagas y enfermedades invasoras amenazan a mucho de lo

que apreciamos.

Si no se controlan, estas “plagas hambrientas” podrían afectar

muchos aspectos de la vida: desde

la tela de la ropa, la comida, la

madera para costruir hogares y

hasta las flores del jardín; estas

plagas ya han costado miles de

mi llo nes de dólares a la economía

de EE. UU. Algunas pueden

incluso dañar la salud pública.

Por ejemplo, el caracol gigante

africano trae un parásito que

causa la meningitis. 

Las plagas hambrientas

Las plagas invasoras son

cualquier insecto, animal, planta o

enfermedad vegetal que no son

nativas de un área. Carecen de

enemigos naturales e infectan a

árboles y plantas en granjas,

bosques, parques y jardines. Típicamente, la gente es la principal

causa de que las plagas han invadido el país o se han propagado

sin intención a nuevas áreas a

través de las mudanzas y las cosas

que empacan. La buena noticia es

que la gente también puede ser

parte de la solución.

Lo que usted puede hacer

•Compre leña local y queme

la leña localmente. Las plagas

invasoras y sus larvas se ocultan en

la leña y recorren largas distancias

escondidas en la leña. No les dé un

viaje gratis, compre leña donde

vaya a quemarla.

•Plante con cuidado. Compre

sus plantas de un proveedor de

confianza y evite a toda costa usar

plantas de especies invasivas. 

•No lleve, ni en persona o

por correo frutas frescas, verduras o plantas a otro estado o al

suyo a menos que los inspectores

de agricultura hayan autorizado

su transporte. 

•Coopere. Cumpla con las

res tricciones de cuarentenas agro -

pecuarias y permita que trabajadores agropecuarios autorizados

tengan acceso a su propiedad para

realizar encuestas de plagas o

enfermedades. 

•Manténgalo todo limpio.

Lave los equipos y neumáticos utilizados al aire libre durante viajes

de pesca, caza o camping. Cuando

se mude de una casa a otra, limpie

el mobiliario de jardín y cualquier

otro objeto que esté al aire libre. 

•Aprenda a identificar. Si

detecta síntomas de una enfermedad o de una especie invasiva,

anótelos o tome fotografías de lo

que haya visto y repórtelo en

www.HungryPests.com/News. 

•¡Hable! Al regresar de un viaje

internacional declare a los agentes

de aduanas todos los productos

agropecuarios que traiga consigo.

Llame al USDA (Departamento de

Agricultura de EE. UU.) para saber

qué productos están permitidos:

(301) 851-2046 para preguntas

acerca de plantas, (301) 851-3300

para preguntas sobre animales. 

Plagas hambrientas amenazan la agricultura de EE. UU.

No le dé a las plagas hambrientas un viaje gratis.
8

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON RESIDENTIAL FURNACE AND BOILER VENTING

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM I E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX: 202-586-4617

DATE AND TIME: WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 2002

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views and comments of interested

persons on issues related to residential furnace and boiler venting installation, present

data collected and to discuss issues concerning venting systems.

AGENDA

9:00-9:15 OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

9:15-9 :30 AGENDA REVIEW

9:30-12:00 RESIDENTIAL FURNACE AND BOILER VENTING

9:30-9:45 Introduction

9:45-10:00 NFGC Background

10:00-10:30 Difference Between Steady State Efficiency (SSE) and

Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE)

10:30-10:45 Break

10:45-11:10 Additional Venting Issues

11:10-11:20 NFGC Tables at Higher SSE's

11:20-11:30 Technology Options

11:30-12:00 Q&A

12:00-1:00 LUNCH

1:00-4:00 STAKEHOLDER PRESENTATIONS

1:00-2:30 Gas Technology Institute (GTI) I Battelle

2:30-3:00 Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association (GAMA)

3:00-4:00 Other Stakeholder Presentations (if any)

4:00-4:30 OPEN DISCUSSION

ADJOURNMENT

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 23B
T.C. Memo. 2010-166

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

ENTERGY CORPORATION & AFFILIATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket No. 25132-06. Filed July 28, 2010.

Stephen D. Gardner and William H. O’Brien , for petitioner. Michael C. Prindible and Melissa D. Arndt , for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
HALPERN, Judge : Entergy Corp. (petitioner) is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations making a consolidated return of income. Respondent determined deficiencies of $17,341,254 and $61,729,798 in the group’s Federal income tax for its 1997 and 1998 taxable (calendar) years, respectively. The issues for decision are whether- 2 -

1 In PPL Corp. v. Commissioner , 135 T.C. ___ (2010), the Commissioner made an alternative argument, asserting that if street and area lighting assets were not used in the distribution of electricity for sale, then they were “land improvements”. See Rev. Proc. 87-56, 1987-2 C.B. 674, 677. In contrast, here respondent expressly concedes any alternative argument. His (continued...) respondent properly denied (1) a foreign tax credit for the United Kingdom (U.K.) windfall tax paid by petitioner’s indirect U.K. subsidiary and (2) depreciation deductions that petitioner’s U.S. subsidiaries claimed for street and area lighting assets (the street light issue). A forthcoming report will address the first issue. The second issue is identical to the issue in PPL Corp. v. Commissioner , 135 T.C. ___ (2010), which we also decide today, and the facts in this case relevant to that issue are identical to the corresponding facts in PPL . The parties have stipulated that, in 1997 and 1998, certain of petitioner’s U.S. subsidiaries provided street and highway lighting and nonroadway lighting for public and private entities. The sole issue is whether street and area lighting assets are used in the “distribution of electricity for sale”. See Rev. Proc. 87-56, 1987-2 C.B. 674, 685. (If they are, then those assets have a recovery period of 20 years, see id. ; if they are not, then they have a recovery period of 7 years, see id. , 1987-2 C.B. at 675.) In PPL , we answer that question in the negative. 1- 3 -

1 (...continued) concession does him no harm, however, because in PPLwe also found against the Commissioner on his alternative argument. Respondent makes no argument that leads us to believe we erred in PPL . We rely on PPLin holding for petitioner on the street light issue.
18521

#### State v. Mason

Affirmed
May 18, 2000

22814

#### State v. Ordonio

Affirmed
26243, 26244, 26245, 26246

#### State v. Adora

Affirmed
May 17, 2000

22769

#### Bank of Hawaii v. Hawaii Aiki Kai

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Tribal-State Compact between the Redding Rancheria, California and the State of California.

# DATES:

The Compact takes effect on November 30, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov;*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Compact permits the Tribe to offer certain forms of Class III gaming. The Compact is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-26376 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 442 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 442

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 25, 2015.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Natural Resources: Mr. LaHood.
     Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. LaHood.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
20 P.3d 676

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Soares

22353

08/04/2000

Vacated and Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         714,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,886,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,605,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,605,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,605,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                438,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            438,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   438,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   149.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Kamai.

27498

05/21/2008

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Joseph Ward Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Bruno Beghé

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1963

Location
      
Emancipation Hall

U.S. Capitol Visitor Center

This statue of Joseph Ward was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by South Dakota in 1963.

Joseph Ward was born at Perry Center, New York, on May 5, 1838. After attending public schools, he taught and farmed before entering Phillips Academy, Andover. He graduated from Brown University and Andover Theological Seminary. Accepting a missionary appointment, he was ordained in 1869 at Yankton, capital of the Dakota Territory, where he organized and directed church efforts. Because there were no public school funds, Ward opened a private school, which became Yankton Academy. Later given over to public control, it became the earliest high school in Dakota.

Ward was instrumental in the founding of Yankton College, the first collegiate-rank institution of the upper Mississippi Valley, and served as its president. He played an important part in keeping school lands out of the control of eastern speculators. He was the first president of the Yankton Board of Education. He also helped establish in 1879 the Dakota Hospital for the Insane.

Ward was a leader in the movement for South Dakota statehood, serving as a delegate to the various conventions and as a member of the 1885 committee to present the petition for statehood to Congress. He drafted much of the constitution and was chairman of the committee charged with keeping the convention records. He composed the state motto and wrote the description for the state seal. Bedridden and unable to attend the final constitutional convention in 1889, he died on December 11, 1889. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00504- CV
Brooks Sp ecial Com pany an d Jerry Bar th, Appellan ts
v. State of Texas, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 98TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GV-0 9-0 0202 0, H ONO RAB LE MARGARET A. CO OP ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N On Dec embe r 1 8 , 2 0 1 2, we abate d this appea l at the parties’ reque st while they pursued settlement neg otiations. The parties have filed a joint motion to set aside the district court’s judgme nt and rema

nd the cause for rendition of an agree d judgme nt. The parties repr esent that they have agree d to a settlement in the form of an agree d judgme nt and perma nent injunction and ask that
we se t aside the district cour t’s judgme nt without re g ard to the merits and rema nd the ca use to the district court for rendition of judgme nt in acc ordanc e with their agree ment. We reinstate the appea l, grant the motion, set aside the district court’s judgme nt without reg ard to the merits, and rema nd the
cause to the district court for rendition of judgme nt in acc ordanc e with the parties’ agree ment. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (2)( B)
._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Vac ated a nd Remanded on Joint M otion Filed: June 7, 2013

2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**540 KA 14-00958** 
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER L. WALTERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ANTHONY M. ROSSI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered May 29, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress the weapon found by the police in the pocket of a sweatshirt that they recovered from an unoccupied seat on a city bus. According to defendant, the weapon should be suppressed because he was illegally detained by police for 11⁄2 hours before they arrested him for possession of the weapon. We reject defendant’s contention. The record of the suppression hearing establishes that the police asked defendant to leave the bus because he matched the description provided by an identified complainant. Before the complainant arrived for a showup identification procedure, a police officer returned to the bus to look for a black sweatshirt, based on the description of the suspect’s clothing that was provided by the complainant, and the sweatshirt was located in a seat that was in proximity to where defendant was seated. The officer observed the gun in the pocket when he picked up the sweatshirt. Following the complainant’s identification of defendant as the man who boarded the bus with a gun, defendant was transported to police headquarters; however, he was not formally charged until the police had reviewed the videotape from the bus, which showed him removing the sweatshirt and changing seats after the bus had stopped and the police arrived.

The court properly determined that defendant abandoned the gun**-2- 540 KA 14-00958** 

following proper police conduct and thus that he lacked standing to seek suppression of that evidence ( see People v Stevenson , 273 AD2d 826, 827; see also People v Hall
, 152 AD2d 905, 905-906, affd 74 NY2d 822; see generally People v Ramirez-Portoreal
, 88 NY2d 99, 110). In any event, contrary to defendant’s contention, the 11⁄2 hour detention during which the police obtained the videotape does not constitute an illegal detention ( cf. People v Ryan
, 12 NY3d 28, 30-31). Indeed, the police had probable cause to arrest defendant at the scene following the positive identification of defendant and the seizure of the weapon ( see People v Williams
, 129 AD3d 1583, 1584, lv denied 26 NY3d 973; cf. Ryan
, 12 NY3d at 30).

Entered: June 17, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Ronald Newell and Jody McBride

Appellate case number: 01-22-00238-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-50845

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

On March 30, 2022, relators, Ronald Newell and Jody McBride, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by granting the motion 

for partial summary judgment of real parties in interest Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, and 

Dustin Dittman, defendants and counter-plaintiffs in the underlying litigation, and Slegte 

Hond, LLC, intervenor in the underlying litigation. In the mandamus petition, relators 

request that this Court direct the trial court to vacate its February 22, 2022 “Order Granting 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ and Intervenor’s Traditional Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment as to the Effectiveness of the Receiver’s Proxy.” 

On April 4, 2022, relators filed an “Emergency Motion to Stay or Abate 

Effectiveness of [the Trial Court’s] Order Voiding Another Court’s [Turnover] Receiver’s 

Irrevocable Proxy” with this Court, requesting that the Court “abate or stay the

effectiveness” of the trial court’s order granting the partial summary judgment of real 

parties in interest pending our consideration of the mandamus petition. 

Relators’ motion for emergency relief to stay or abate the trial court’s February 22, 

2022 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of real parties in interest is denied. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April Farris

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 5, 2022
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


     The following are the  subsidiaries  of the Company,  for each of which the
voting stock is 100% owned by the Company. Each of the following subsidiaries is
inactive.

(1)  RSI Holdings of Florida, Inc., incorporated in Florida.

(2)  Sunbelt   Distributors,   Inc.,   incorporated  in  South  Carolina.

(3)  HomeAdd Financial Corporation, incorporated in South Carolina.

(4)  HomeAdd  Financial  Services  Corp.,  a wholly owned  subsidiary of HomeAdd
     Financial Corporation, incorporated in North Carolina.