alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: August 9,
2006
    /s/ Scott P. PettitScott P. Pettit, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                               Earnings Per Share
             For the three months ended September 30, 1996 and 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months ended
                                                          September 30,
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                       1996              1997
                                                   ------------    -----------
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>       
Average shares outstanding                           23,845,000     27,767,000

Common equivalent shares:
     Options and warrants                             2,383,500      1,459,000
     Convertible subordinated notes                   6,161,000      6,107,000
                                                   ------------    -----------
     Fully diluted shares outstanding                32,389,500     35,333,000
                                                   ============    ===========


Net Income                                         $ (4,624,000)   $13,081,000

Adjustment to add back interest on
     Convertible subordinated notes                     958,000        898,000
                                                   ------------    -----------
Adjusted Net Income                                $ (3,666,000)   $13,979,000
                                                   ============    ===========

                                                   ------------    -----------
Fully diluted earnings per share                   $       (.11)          0.40
                                                   ============    ===========
</TABLE>
#### Billy Eugene BOUSKA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-76-564.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 23, 1977.

Don Anderson, Public Defender, for appellant.

*1015Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Robert L. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Eric Warner, Legal Intern, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Billy Eugene Bouska, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF-74-4158, for the offense of Burglary in the Second Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony, and he was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of thirty-five (35) years. From this judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

A careful reading of the record, and a study of the brief, reveals no assignment of error which would justify modification or reversal. Therefore, pursuant to this Court’s authority founded in 20 O.S.1971, § 49, we find the judgment and sentence should be, and hereby is, *AFFIRMED.*

BUSSEY, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
#### State v. Tonga

22889

12/29/2000

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

National Environmental Policy Act

Documents: Plant Protection and

Quarantine

Last Modified: 

Print

In planning and conducting program activities, Plant Protection and Quarantine

(PPQ) follows the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the NEPA procedures

at APHIS.

Learn More About NEPA Procedures at APHIS

PPQ NEPA Documents

For easy reference, we make final NEPA documents available below, organized by

topic (pest, disease, or commodity) and State. These include final environmental

assessments, environmental impact statements, findings of no significant impact (or

"FONSIs"), and records of decision from the past 7 years. Many of these documents

are also available at regulations.gov.

Please contact aphisweb@usda.gov to request archived documents older than 7

years.

Loading...
Related Links

Commenting Opportunities: Plant Health

Commenting Opportunities: Facilitating Safe Agricultural Trade

APHIS Federal Register Postings

Plant Protection and Quarantine
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 97-30235

_____________________
RICKY BRYAN SEAL, SR; SELENA ANN SEAL Plaintiffs-Intervenor Defendants Appellees-Cross-Appellants
versus TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee
versus WAL-MART STORES, INC. Defendant-Intervenor Defendant Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (Lake Charles)

(95-CV-1486)

_________________________________________________________________ February 11, 1998 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 47.6. A F F I R M E D.
#### State v. Santana

19170

4/29/97

Vacated and Remanded
TDCJ Offender Details 

### Page 1 of2 TEXAS;.DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINALJUSTICE. ESUBE BfflMtfPffMm 

# Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number: TDCJ Number: Name: Race: Gender: DOB: Maximum Sentence Date: Current Facility: Projected Release Date: 

### Parole Eligibility Date: Offender Visitation Eligible: 04102396 01546714 VALIER.NKRUMAH LAMUNBA B M 1970-02-11 2046-10-02 ALLRED 2046-10-02 2026-10-02 YES 

### Information provided is updated once daily duringweekdays and multiple times perday on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and friends are encouragedto call the unitpriorto travelingfor a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

## Parole Review Information Offense History: 

### Offense Date Offense Sentence Date County Case No. Sentence (YY-MM-DD) 

# 2005-03-23 | SEXUALASLT 2006-09-11 |HARRIS | 1030025 | 2-00-00 http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=04102396 8/18/2015
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Premier Community Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

 

/s/ Donald L. Unger                                        

Donald L. Unger

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ John A. Willingham                                    

John A. Willingham

Chief Financial Officer

 

Date:      3/12/07
# C_2019082EN.01001002.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/10

---

Appeal brought on 3 December 2018 by Päivi Leino-Sandberg against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 20 September 2018 in Case T-421/17: Leino-Sandberg v Parliament

(Case C-761/18 P)

(2019/C 82/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (represented by: O. W. Brouwer, advocaat, S. Schubert, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order of the General Court of 20 September 2018 in Case T-421/17; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the General Court of 20 September 2018 in Case T-421/17;

| — | make use of its power under the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 61 of the Statute of the Court of Justice to give final judgment in the matter, and |
| --- | --- |

—

make use of its power under the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 61 of the Statute of the Court of Justice to give final judgment in the matter, and

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of any intervening parties. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of any intervening parties.

Pleas in law and main arguments

First ground of appeal: errors of law in the contested order when it holds that there is no longer a purpose to the action, and therefore no need to adjudicate. The appellant submits that the contested order incorrectly does not apply the legal test set out in Case C-57/16 P, ClientEarth v. Commission (EU:C:2018:660) under which it should have concluded that because the European Parliament has not withdrawn the contested decision, the purpose of the action remained.

Second ground of appeal: errors of law and procedure in the contested order when it holds that there is no longer an interest in bringing proceedings. The appellant submits that the contested order misapplies the legal test set out in established case-law, including Case C-57/16 P, under which it should have concluded that the unlawfulness is liable to recur in the future, irrespective of the particular circumstances of the case, and that therefore the interest in bringing proceedings remained.

---
#### Dwyer v. Dwyer

19401

5/27/98

Affirmed
#### State v. Nguyen

20664

5/27/98

Affirmed
ex_118432.htm


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO


Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement 


 


 


Effective as of July 18, 2018, John Tattory (“Participant”) and Windtree Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby agree to amend the Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) Award Agreement between them dated as of November 1, 2017 and the related notice of award (as it may have been previously amended, the “RSU Agreement”) to reflect the revisions set forth herein (“Amendment No. 2”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the RSU Agreement.


 


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the RSU Agreement, or in Participant’s Employment Agreement, as amended, the vesting date for the RSU awarded to Participant effective November 1, 2017 is hereby changed from August 1, 2018 to October 1, 2018. The second vesting date for the balance of the RSU award shall remain unchanged.


 


Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the RSU Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment No. 2 confirms an agreement between Participant and the Company with respect to the subject matter hereof and is a material part of the consideration stated in the RSU Agreement and mutual promises made in connection therewith. The parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and date first set forth above.


 


 


	
			Windtree Therapeutics, Inc.

				 
	 	 
	 	 
	
			By:       /s/ Kathy Cole

				 
	
			Name:  Kathy Cole

				
			/s/ John Tattory

			
	
			Title:    SVP, Human Resources

				
			Name: John Tattory
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-51049 Summary Calendar

TONY RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A:96-CV-509

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tony Ramirez, Texas prisoner # 621725, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Ramirez argues that his guilty plea was involuntary and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him regarding the parole-eligibility effects of the guilty plea. We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the2

reasons stated by the district court. See Ramirez v. Johnson , No. A:96-CV-509-SS (W.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements of Checkers Drive-in  Restaurants,  Inc., for the quarterly
period  ended March 24,  1997,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-24-1997
<CASH>                                       3,451
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,556
<PP&E>                                     131,532
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,854
<BONDS>                                     39,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        61
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               130,075
<SALES>                                     32,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,157
<CGS>                                       32,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00

<FN>
Footnote:     Receivables consist of -
                 Accounts receivable (net)              $ 1,900
                 Notes receivable                           362
                 Income taxes receivable                  3,378
                                                       --------
                                                        $ 5,640
                                                       ======== 
           
          

                                       25
</FN>

 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58742, 33-76652, 33-94730,
333-24969, 33-94736, 333-40315, 333-48911, 333-40572, 333-104094, and 333-104095) and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75826, 333-01273, 333-03131, 333-18001, 333-76338 and 333-109263) of our report dated November 18, 2003, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
Selected Financial Data in such Form 10-K.



|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|------------------------------
|                              
|Boston, Massachusetts         
|December 19, 2003
<PAGE>   1
   
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



                  We consent to the incorporation by reference into (i)
post-effective amendment on Form S-3 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(Commission File No. 33-88796) of Dominion Bridge Corporation, formerly Cedar
Group, Inc. (the "Company") and (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Commission File No. 333-01045) of the Company of our report dated December
23, 1996 except as to note 19 which is as of June 13, 1997 appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended September 30, 1996.


                                           By: /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
                                               ---------------------
                                               Deloitte & Touche







Dated: December 8, 1997
#### State v. McMeen

17390

10/30/96

Affirmed
Order filed September 13, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00274-CR

NO. 14-12-00275-CR

____________

NATHAN GOODWIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 10CR1699 & 10CR1700

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) 

and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s Exhibit 7, a DVD.

The clerk of the 212th District Court is directed to deliver to the clerk of this court 

the original of State’s Exhibit 7, a DVD, on or before September 28, 2012. The clerk of 
2

this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it 

to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to 

return the original of State’s Exhibit 7, a DVD, to the clerk of the 212th District Court.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 229 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 229

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 29, 2015.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Walker.
    Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. Dold.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```