alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the filing by Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “company”) of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
(the “Report”) I, Kenneth M. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the company
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(ii)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      company.




This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Financial Officer of Applied Energetics, Inc. with the requirements of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other
purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Applied Energetics, Inc. and will be retained by Applied
Energetics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




/s/ Kenneth M. WallaceKenneth
      M. WallaceChief
      Financial Officer





Date: May
11, 2009
#### Queen’s Medical Center v. Tokiyo Kagawa

21034

11/16/98

Dismissed

88 Hawai'i 489, 967 P.2d 686
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Crawford W. Long Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
J. Massey Rhind

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1926

Location
      
Crypt

This statue of Crawford W. Long was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Georgia in 1926.

Crawford W. Long, a quiet country doctor, was the first to discover the effect of ether and to use it in surgery. Born November 1, 1815, he was the son of a merchant and planter in Danielsville, Georgia. He graduated second in his class from the University of Georgia. He studied medicine at Transylvania College in Lexington, Kentucky, received his medical degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1839, and studied surgery in New York City.

Returning to Georgia, he set up practice in Jefferson, Jackson County. There he began to experiment with sulfuric ether. On March 30, 1842, he used it surgically for the first time to remove a tumor from the neck of a boy. In 1849 medical journals reported similar work by a Boston dentist. When Congress introduced legislation granting the dentist $100,000 for this discovery, others claimed the reward. Long, who had not published the results of his work, then did so in the *Southern Medical Journal*. Recognizing Long's priority, others withdrew their claims and Congress dropped the bill. A research pamphlet later published by Johns Hopkins University substantiated Long's claim.

Long moved to Athens, Georgia, acquiring a large practice and an apothecary shop. He also began to use ether in obstetrical cases and did much charitable work among the poor. He died on June 16, 1878, of heart failure at the bedside of a mother who had just given birth. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
19007

#### State v. Guerpo

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol Campus
Grounds Features
        
                  AOC employees are responsible for the care and preservation of more than 100 varieties of trees and bushes planted around the U.S. Capitol, as well as outdoor sculptures including monuments, memorials and water features.
**Browse the highlights below or learn more about the trees on campus.**
    
    
    Expand FiltersHide Filters
          Filter ResultsDisplaying 10 - 12 of 12
            Sort by
        NameYear
    Search
Type
    Landscape Element

                    Cherry Blossom

                    Tree

                    Water Feature

                    Sculpture

                    Memorial

                    MonumentState (field_state) (entityreference filter)
        State AffiliationAlabamaConnecticutDCDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasMaineMarylandMassachusettsMinnesotaMissouriNebraskaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew YorkNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaPennsylvaniaSouth CarolinaTennesseeWashingtonWest Virginia
Place (field_relation_place) (entityreference filter)
        LocationFord House Office BuildingHart Senate Office BuildingLongworth House Office BuildingRayburn House Office BuildingRussell Senate Office BuildingSupreme Court BuildingThomas Jefferson BuildingU.S. Capitol Grounds
      Russell Building Cherry Trees

Site of one variety: Yoshino (*Prunus x yeodoensis*).
    Supreme Court Building Cherry Trees

Site of one variety: Yoshino (*Prunus x yeodoensis*).
    Taft Memorial Cherry Trees

Site of one variety: Yoshino (*Prunus x yeodoensis*).
                  Pagination
    First page
            « First
                          Previous page
            ‹
                                      Page1
              Current page2 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
26270

#### State v. Perez

Affirmed
Date: 20150 516 Revision: 1.0 Revision:1.0

Page 1 of 1

PRIVACY INFORMATION

- NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Appendix B

PRIVACY POLICY

One area of notable concern requiring attention regarding public and civil use of UAS technologies is personal privacy. Rupestrian CyberServices believes that respect of individual privacy guaranteed by our Constitution and the Fourth Amendment are sacrosanct and the potential for UAS technology to usurp those rights is very real. As with all new technology, we must move slowly in its application as we seek to include it in our daily lives. There are many emotional issues to overcome in the use of UAS technologies and part of our job in the UAS community is to ensure we educate and gain the trust of all people to ensure we are ever mindful of their privacy concerns.

Rupestrian CyberServices will comply with any federal, state, and/or local privacy policies or rules that may apply in particular areas where DJI UAS are used. Further, because we will only fly over private property with the permission of the land owner, the likelihood that we will collect private information of an unknown person is minimal. Information provided to customers will be masked to include only the acreage for which they are responsible, further limiting the possibility of a trespass of privacy.



### .
#### State v. Yamamoto

23697

04/25/2002

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Animal Care

Last Modified: 

Print

Animal Care works to ensure the humane treatment of more than 1 million

vulnerable animals, nationwide. Through inspections and outreach, we oversee

thousands of groups, from breeders to managers of horse shows, to make sure their

animals receive care and treatment that meets Federal standards. We also provide

national leadership on the safety and well-being of pets and other animals during

disasters.
Learn more about our organization and the authorities under which we work.

Priorities

Ensuring the Humane Treatment of Animals 

Regulations established under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) set standards for the

humane care and treatment of certain animals exhibited to the public, sold for use

as pets, used in research, or transported commercially.

Find AWA Services and Information

Center for Animal Welfare 

The Center for Animal Welfare is a national resource for Federal agencies, State and

local officials, foreign governments, industry groups, partner organizations,

universities, and others. With expertise in a wide range of animal species, we can

provide advice and best practices for humane care and treatment, health, and

welfare.

Explore the Center for Animal Welfare
Protecting Animals in Emergencies 

We work closely with other government organizations under the Federal Emergency

Management Agency’s (FEMA) National Response Framework to develop an

integrated approach to disaster relief for pets and other animals.

Learn About Our Emergency Programs
Ending the Practice of Soring Horses 

The Horse Protection Act and its associated regulations seek to put an end to

soring–a cruel and inhumane practice in which chemical or mechanical irritants are

applied to a horse's legs to enhance their gait. We monitor for sored horses and

prevent them from participating in exhibitions, shows, sales, or auctions.

Learn About the HPA

Trending Topics

Animal Welfare Resources 

Are you part of our AWA-regulated community, interested in becoming licensed or

registered, or just looking to learn more? We offer many publications and guidance

documents on the AWA and related topics.

Attending Veterinarians 

Attending veterinarians are essential to the success of AWA-regulated facilities.

Learn about their authority, duties, and more.

AWA Standards for Birds ("Bird Rule") 
This page gives an overview of the new welfare standards for birds published in the

Federal Register on February 21, 2023.

Import Permits (Dogs for Resale and Adoption) 

We work with partners at U.S. ports of entry to make sure dogs imported into the

United States for commercial sale or adoption meet the AWA's health, age, and

vaccination requirements. Find out about import permit requirements for these dogs

or apply for a permit.
#### State v. Trenda

22441

09/25/2000

Affirmed
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

CARLTON MCGEE,

Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. Case No. 5D17-1701 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. / Opinion file d July 21, 2017 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Carlton McGee, Wewahitchka, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the December 7, 2017 judgments and sentences in Case No. 2016- CF

- 1772 in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.
ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2022 WY 6

 October Term, A.D. 2021

January 12, 2022

MARTIN JAMES PETERSON,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-21-0198

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following the filing of the 

Pro Se Brief of Appellant. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an 

unconditional guilty plea to one count of failure to register as a sex offender, a subsequent 

offense. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-19-302; § 7-19-307(d). The district court imposed a six to 

eight-year sentence. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s April 16,

2021 Judgment and Sentence.

[¶2] On November 29, 2021, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a 

Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 

S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant 

may “file with this Court a pro se brief which specifies the issues for the Court to consider 

in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief 

expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw, and if 

appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. Appellant filed his Pro Se Brief of 

Appellant December 16, 2021. 

[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the pro se brief, the record, and the Anders brief 

submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to 
withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Judgment and Sentence should be 

affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel 

for Appellant Martin James Peterson, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Sweetwater County District Court’s April 16, 2021 Judgment

and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 12th day of January, 2022.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M. FOX

Chief Justice
Order filed June 4, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00304-CV

____________

JANICE JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1026606

ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. Karen Field, the official 

court reporter, informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for 

payment for the reporter’s record. On April 22, 2013, the clerk of this court 

notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not 

require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this 

court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant 

filed no response. 
2

Accordingly, we issue the following order:

We ORDER appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before June 24, 

2013. If appellant does not timely file the brief as ordered, we will dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Anna Maria Caldara <actnow4peace@gmail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:32 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Dear Gilbert Mears, 

As water is our most precious resource, and necessary for ourselves and every species and future generations of 

same, I implore you to bring all oil and gas operations into compliance with industries' disclosure of toxic 

releases. We who depend on clean drinking and bathing water deserve to know what pollutants are threatening 

our health. Please act courageously to include oil and gas in the Toxic Release Inventory immediately. 

Thank you. 

Anna Maria Caldara 

Bangor, Pennsylvania 18013 

-- 

Anna Maria Caldara 

To order my book "Lenape Culture in Stone and Wood": http://tinyurl.com/mwlsn28

To order my book "Gossamer Threads": http://tinyurl.com/69belz8

To order my mandalas: http://anna-maria-caldara.fineartamerica.com
#### State v. Olivas

17111

11/14/96

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Contagious Equine Metritis (CEM)

Testing for Imported Horses

Last Modified: 

Print

Contagious equine metritis (CEM) is a venereal disease of horses. In most cases,

horses that are sexually intact, over 731 days of age, and from a region or country

affected by CEM are subject to CEM quarantine before being allowed into the United

States, unless they have an import permit waiver.

Each CEM quarantine facility is State-approved and -operated, with APHIS oversight.

The documents listed below are reference material for State CEM coordinators.

Approved Labs for CEM Testing 

(PDF, 48.08 KB)

Labs approved to conduct CEM culture and serology (complement fixation test)

VS Guidance Document 15202.2 

(PDF, 224.8 KB)

Approval of and Requirements for Laboratories to Conduct Tests for Contagious

Equine Metritis

VS Guidance 13406.3 
(PDF, 308.3 KB)

CEM Testing for Imported Horses at Approved Quarantine Facilities

Importing Horses and Other Equines

The requirements to import horses, mules, donkeys, asses, zebras, and their hybrids

into our country depend on several factors.

How To Import Horses and Other Equines into the United States

States Approved for Conducting CEM Testing

State Email or Website Phone Number

California ahbfeedback@cdfa.ca.gov 916-900-5002

Colorado colorado.gov/aganimals 303-869-9130 

Florida EquinePrograms@FDACS.com 850-410-0942

Indiana  animalhealth@boah.in.gov 317-544-2400

Kentucky agr.equine@ky.gov 502-573-0282 

Maryland animalhealth.mda@maryland.gov 410-841-5810

New Jersey nj.gov/agriculture/divisions/ah 609-671-6400

New York info@miller-dvm.com 914-276-1260

North Carolina joe.web@ncagr.gov 919-707-3250

Ohio animal@agri.ohio.gov 614-728-6220

Oregon info@oda.state.or.us 503-986-4680

Rhode Island dem.ri.gov/programs/agriculture 401-222-2781

Tennessee animal.health@TN.gov 615-837-5120

Virginia vastatevet@vdacs.virginia.gov 804-786-2483

Wisconsin DATCPAnimalImports@wisconsin.gov 608-224-4872

For general information about this disease, visit Contagious Equine Metritis.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DWAYNE JORDAN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 3

- 811

[ July 6, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Thomas J. Coleman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 15762CF10A

.
Dwayne Jordan

, Moore Haven

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

APHIS Seeks Partners to Develop

Antimicrobial Resistance Dashboards

to Protect Animal and Public Health

Print

Stakeholder Announcement

Contact:

APHISpress@usda.gov

WASHINGTON, March 19, 2024 – For the second year, the U.S Department of

Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is inviting partners

to collaborate on the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) dashboards.

These dashboards provide stakeholders with critical data to address AMR, a growing

global health threat. APHIS will provide up to $3 million dollars for these efforts in

2024.

"Antimicrobial resistance is a serious challenge that affects both animal and public

health," said Mike Watson, APHIS Administrator. "By continuing to develop

innovative AMR dashboards, we can better understand AMR trends and determine

strategies to protect the health of animals and people."

AMR occurs when bacteria and other microbes develop resistance to antibiotics and

other antimicrobial drugs, making these drugs less effective or ineffective at treating

infections. This can have serious consequences for both animal and human health.
APHIS is seeking partners with expertise in AMR data analysis, dashboard

development, and stakeholder engagement. Eligible partners include state

departments of agriculture; Tribal entities; offices of state animal health officials;

nonprofits; institutions of higher education; livestock, poultry, or aquaculture

producer organizations; and veterinary organizations.

"We are committed to working with our partners to confront the challenge of AMR,"

said Watson. "Together, we can make a significant impact in protecting animal and

public health."

AMR dashboards will provide insights into AMR trends in domesticated animals,

ensuring informed decision-making and targeted interventions. This collaborative

effort will harness the power of data to inform strategies for responsible

antimicrobial use and monitor the emergence of resistant bacteria.

APHIS is actively engaged in activities to better understand AMR patterns and

develop effective mitigation strategies. The agency collaborates with a diverse

network of partners, including state and federal agencies, Tribal entities, academic

institutions, and industry stakeholders, to tackle the AMR challenge collectively.

Contributing to this critical effort through collaboration offers a unique opportunity

to advance the fight against AMR and directly impact animal and public health.

The funding opportunity announcement, including application instructions and

additional information, is available on the APHIS website. Applicants can also find

information on the ezFedGrants website or Grants.gov by searching AMR,

Antimicrobial Resistance, or Funding Opportunity Number USDA-APHIS-10025-

VSSP0000-24-0010.

Interested partners are encouraged to visit our webpage to learn more about this

collaborative research opportunity. Together, we can make a significant impact in

the fight against AMR.