alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14


 


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
SECOND Amendment (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF April 6, 2017
AND AMENDED ON JULY 20, 2017 (THE “FIRST AMENDMENT”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”)
AND frost gamma investments trust (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE
NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on April 6, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS, on July
20, 2017, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 until July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Second Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Second Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 



    	 



    	 



     


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 


6. Counterparts.
This Second Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Second Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
        By:

        
	/s/ James J. Martin
	 	 	 	
        Name:

        
	James J. Martin
	 	 	 	Title:	
        Chief Financial Officer

        

	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	FROST GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
        By:

        
	/s/ Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Name:	Phillip Frost, M.D.	 	 	 
	Title:	Trustee
FELIX STORCH, INC. 770 GARRISON AVE. BRONX, NY 10474
Building Technologies Program U.S. Department ofEnergy Test Procedure Waiver 1000 Independence Ave., SW Mailstop EE-2J Washington, DC 20585-0121
Transmittal Letter: December 1 7, 2013
Dear Sir/Madam,
Enclosed please find: Phone: 718-893-3900 Fax: 718-842-3093 e-mail: paul@summitappliance.com

3 copies ofFelix Storch, Inc. Petition for Waiver for test procedures dated Dec. 17, 2013 Certification that copies were mailed to identified competitors with the names and addresses ofthe competitors. A copy ofthe cover letter sentto those competitors advising them oftheir right to submit comments to DOE. Please feel free to contactthe undersigned for any questions; 

# y}.(:t-/1 Paul StorY

# fl) President
H. Res. 480 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 21, 2015. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 10) to reauthorize the Scholarships for Opportunity 

and Results Act, and for other purposes. The first reading of 

the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. 

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendments recommended by the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted 

in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. The bill, 

as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. No 
2 

•HRES 480 EH 

further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order 

except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each further amendment may 

be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 

considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 

in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 

and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and 

shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question 

in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points 

of order against such further amendments are waived. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the 

House with such further amendments as may have been 

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 692) to ensure 

the payment of interest and principal of the debt of the 

United States. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
3 

•HRES 480 EH 

on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to 

recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
January 21, 2005

25524

#### Hashimoto v. State

Vacated and Remanded
| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| /s/James A. Cannavino   |
|-------------------------|
| James A. Cannavino      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

----

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael J. Beecher  |
|-------------------------|
| Michael J. Beecher      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
#### The WARNER COLLIERIES COMPANY OF DELAWARE, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.

No. 8056.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1939.

Campbell, Wick, Houck & Thomas, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Charles M. Trammell and Donald C. McGovern, both of Washington D. C., for petitioner.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., J. P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, and F. E. Youngman, all of Washington D. C. for respondent.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals now sought to be reviewed is one upon a disputed issue of fact and that the finding of the Board is sustained by substantial evidence; and

It further appearing that there is no other issue now open to review since the taxpayer acquiesced in a former opinion of the Board without taking a cross-appeal therefrom; now, therefore:

It is hereby ordered that the decision of the Board be and it is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the Board.
#### State v. Mason

18374

5/13/96

Reversed
ATTACHMENT C

Safer Choice Program: Form for Adding Third-Party Partners and Products

(Private Label Companies, Licensees, or Toll Manufacturers)

OMB Control No. 2070-0178

Approval expires XX/XX/XX 

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 29.5 hours per response 

for formulators of cleaning and non-cleaning products and 9.5 hours per response for partners wishing to add third-party partners 

and products, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering information, and completing and reviewing the application. 

Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested 

methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, 

Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 

20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed application to this address.

Note that this form will be incorporated into the Salesforce system in the coming months. The fields in the online form in 

Salesforce will be identical to the PDF form. Until this part of the system is fully incorporated, the Agency will continue to 

use this PDF application form.
May 6, 2005

26060

#### State v. Narmore

Affirmed
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STATE OF DELAWARE, )

 )

 v. ) ID# 1310002191 

 )

QUINTON MULDROW, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

AND NOW TO WIT, this 13th day of April, 2015, upon consideration of 

Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Indictment and Compel Photo Line Up, IT 

APPEARS THAT:

1. Defendant was charged with two counts of Burglary Second Degree, one 

count of Burglary Third Degree, and three counts of Theft. On September 16, 

2014, a one-day jury trial was held. After opening statements and the testimony of 

multiple witnesses called by the prosecution, the Defendant pleaded guilty to 

Burglary Second Degree and Burglary Third Degree.

2. Defendant filed a pro se Motion for Withdraw of Guilty Plea on 

September 29, 2014, and the Court denied the motion on October 17, 2014. 

Defendant filed another pro se Motion for Withdraw of Guilty Plea on November 

12, 2014, and the Court again denied the motion. In each instance the Court found 
2

that the Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered his guilty 

plea.1

3. Prior to sentencing, on January 12, 2015, Defedant filed a Motion to 

Vacate Indictment and Compel Photo Line Up. 2 Defendant aruges that the State 

failed to turn over Brady material and requests an in-court camera hearing to 

compel the State to produce the Brady material. By pleading guilty, Defendant 

waived any alleged Brady violation.3

NOW THEREFORE, Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Indictment and 

Compel Photo Line Up is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jan R. Jurden, President Judge

 1 Docket ID 81; Docket ID 84. 2 Docket ID 92.

3 Brown v. State, 108 A.3d 1201, 1205–06 (Del. 2015).
134 P.3d 638

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

May 23, 2006

26923

#### Elizares v. State

Affirmed
893 P.2d 200

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Smith v. Hawaiian Homes Comm'n

17923

3/10/95

Affirmed
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CLEARVALUE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

AND

RICHARD ALAN HAASE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC., POLYCHEMIE, 

INC., SNF, INC., POLYDYNE, INC., AND SNF 

HOLDING COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2012-1595

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas in No. 06-CV-0197, Judge 

Leonard Davis.

______________________ 

Decided: December 9, 2013

______________________ 

RICHARD A. HAASE, of Missouri City, Texas, pro se. 
2 CLEARVALUE, INC. v. PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC. 

HOWARD L. CLOSE, Wright & Close, L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, for defendants-appellees. With him on the 

brief were R. RUSSELL HOLLENBECK; and ANDY TINDEL,

Mann, Tindel & Thompson, of Tyler, Texas.

______________________ 

Before MOORE, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

Mr. Haase appeals from the district court’s order that

Appellees are entitled to recover (1) costs as the prevailing party in this case, and (2) monetary sanctions related 

to discovery violations by Mr. Haase and others. In 

previous appeals related to this case, we affirmed the 

district court’s imposition of monetary sanctions, affirmed 

the grant of judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that 

Appellees did not misappropriate a trade secret, and 

reversed the denial of JMOL of patent invalidity. See 

ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc., 668 F.3d 

1340, 1345–46 (Fed. Cir. 2012); ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl 

River Polymers, Inc., 560 F.3d 1291, 1304–05 (Fed. Cir. 

2009). 

Mr. Haase argues that the district court abused its 

discretion by awarding costs to Appellees; challenges the 

award of monetary sanctions; and challenges the final 

judgment related to trade secret misappropriation and 

patent invalidity. We have considered these and all other 

arguments Mr. Haase raises, and find them to be without 

merit. Accordingly, we affirm. 

AFFIRMED

COSTS

Costs are awarded to Appellees.
May 28, 2008

28133

#### State v. De Guair

Affirmed
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

. ''-!\~ \_, 

;~;r.; o~;~o:O.<;~;r~~~~o:!yahoo com> . , ;. (1V,oC:~.,; Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Reeve Air service to Tatitlek Ak 

~.,.,s '·':'n. ! "' : ''· ., LJ •. I . I ! L /J. : : . .J s. 

-----__...-

I am writing in regards to the service that Mike Reeve provides to our community. I am definitely in favor of his 

continued service as the fares are very reasonable, if not for his continued flights it would make travel near 

impossible for many community members. Mike has been very professional, considerate and helpful the times I 

have utilized his service. Many people, including myself are hopeful that he continues to offer the great service 

he provides. Thank you. 

Cory Totemoff 

P 0 Box 103 

Tatitlek, Ak 99677 

(907) 461-7023 

1
Exhibit 12.3

Southwestern Electric Power Company
Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For Years Ended December 31,

                              1998      1997      1996       1995      1994
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                                        (thousands, except ratios)

Operating income           $150,787   $139,409   $138,083  $162,776  $145,922
Adjustments
  Income taxes               62,595     44,396     32,931    41,131    20,623
  Provision for deferred
     income taxes           (11,850)    (2,244)     2,849     6,287    22,248
Deferred investment tax     
     credits                 (4,631)    (4,662)    (4,730)   (4,786)   (4,278)
Charges for investments
     and plant development                  
      costs, net of tax         --        (483)   (21,815)      --        --
Other income and deductions   1,115      3,578        312       178     4,656
Allowance for borrowed and
     equity funds used                      
      during construction     2,687      2,156      2,423     9,334     6,097
Interest portion of       
      financing leases          598      1,194      1,514     1,896     2,562
                           ----------------------------------------------------
     Earnings              $201,301   $183,334   $151,567  $216,816  $197,830
                           ====================================================

Fixed charges:
  Interest on long-term     
     debt                   $39,233    $40,440    $44,066   $44,468   $43,395
  Distributions on Trust
     Preferred Securities     8,662      5,582       --         --        --
  Interest on short-term    
     debt & other             8,591      5,736      8,381    10,706     7,568
  Interest portion of       
     financing leases           598      1,194      1,514     1,896     2,562
                            ===================================================
     Fixed Charges          $57,084    $52,952    $53,961   $57,070   $53,525
                            ===================================================


Ratio of earnings to fixed    
     charges                   3.53       3.46       2.81      3.80      3.70


                                      4-16
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than December 20, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas*                     (Karen Smith, Director, Mergers & Acquisitions)  2200 N Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@dal.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Francisco Perales, San Antonio, Texas;*                     to acquire voting shares of San Diego Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First State Bank of San Diego, both of San Diego, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-26687 Filed 12-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Standard Management Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003, we Ronald
D. Hunter and Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Standard Management Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1)      such Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      the information contained in such Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of Standard
                           Management Corporation.

March 30, 2004

/s/ Ronald D. Hunter
_____________________________________
Ronald D. Hunter
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer
_____________________________________
Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer
President and Chief Financial Officer