Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85237 

6Commerce finds Shinchang Construction Co., 

Ltd. to be cross-owned with Hyundai RB. 

7Commerce finds the following companies to be 

cross-owned with SeAH Steel: SeAH Holdings 

Corporation; and ESAB SeAH Corporation. 

8See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

9See, e.g., Honey from Argentina: Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 

29518 (May 24, 2004), and accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum at Issue 4. 10See Order, 84 FR at 18775. 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Republic 

of Armenia, Brazil, the Sultanate of Oman, the 

Russian Federation, and the Republic of Turkey: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 62790 (November 

12, 2021) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 65750 (November 1, 

2022). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

50, 55 (January 3, 2023) (Initiation Notice). 

4Commerce previously determined that Assan 

Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Kibar Dis 

Ticaret A.S., and Ispak Esnek Ambalaj Sanayi A.S., 

comprise the Assan Single Entity. See Certain 

Continued 

Company 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. and its crossowned affiliates 6 ............................ 1.54 

SeAH Steel Corporation and its 

cross-owned affiliates 7 .................. * 0.19 

HiSteel Co., Ltd ................................. 1.54 

* (de minimis). 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

parties in this proceeding the 

calculations performed for these final 

results of review within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register.8

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review, for the 

above-listed companies at the applicable 

ad valorem assessment rates listed. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Instructions 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown for each of the 

companies listed above based on 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review.9 For all nonreviewed firms subject to the Order, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the most recent 

company-specific rate or the all-others 

rate (i.e., 9.29 percent), as appropriate.10

These cash deposit requirements, 

effective upon publication of these final 

results, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 1, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Subsidies Valuation Information 

V. Analysis of Programs 

VI. Discussion of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether the Korea Emissions 

Trading System (K–ETS) Program Is 

Countervailable 

Comment 2: Whether the Provision of 

Electricity for Less Than Adequate 

Remuneration (LTAR) Is Countervailable 

Comment 3: Whether the Demand 

Response Resources (DRR) Program Is 

Countervailable 

Comment 4: Whether Certain Programs Are 

De Facto Specific When Widely 

Available and Used 

Comment 5: Whether the Energy Storage 

Systems (ESS) Program Is Specific 

Comment 6: Whether the Employment 

Security Improvement (ESI) Program Is 

Countervailable 

Comment 7: Whether To Adjust the 

Calculated Benefit Under Restriction of 

Special Local Taxation Act (RSLTA) 

Article 78 for the Payment of the Special 

Rural Development Tax (SRDT) 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–26901 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–844] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

Republic of Turkey: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that the certain producers/ 

exporters subject to this administrative 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR) 

September 23, 2021, through October 

31, 2022. Interested parties are invited 

to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Williams or Bryan Hansen, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5166 or 

(202) 482–3683, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 12, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the 

Republic of Turkey (Turkey).1 On 

November 1, 2022, we published in the 

Federal Register a notice of opportunity 

to request an administrative review of 

the Order for the POR.2 On January 3, 

2023, based on timely requests for an 

administrative review, Commerce 

initiated an administrative review of the 

Order with respect to four companies.3

On January 26, 2023, Commerce 

selected the Assan Single Entity 4 for 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85238 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

Aluminum Foil from the Republic of Turkey: Final 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 86 FR 52880 n.10 (September 23, 2021); 

see also Initiation Notice, 88 FR at 51 (‘‘Commerce 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of this review and will 

not collapse companies at the respondent selection 

phase unless there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a previous segment 

of this {antidumping duty} proceeding (e.g., 

investigation, administrative review, new shipper 

review, or changed circumstances review).’’). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated January 26, 2023. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Additional Respondent 

Selection,’’ dated May 5, 2023. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022,’’ dated July 6, 

2023. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022,’’ dated 

November 13, 2023. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum Foil 

from the Republic of Turkey: Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021– 

2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

10With rates for two examined respondents, 

Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for the examined respondents using each 

company’s actual total U.S. sales value; (B) a simple 

average of the weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a 

weighted-average of the weighted-average dumping 

margins calculated for the examined respondents 

using each company’s publicly-ranged total U.S. 

sales value. Commerce then compares (B) and (C) 

to (A), and, in order to not reveal the business 

proprietary total U.S. sales value of the two 

examined respondents, selects the rate closest to (A) 

as the most appropriate rate for the non-examined 

companies. See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum 

Foil from Turkey: Preliminary Rate for NonSelected Respondents,’’ dated November 30, 2023; 

see also Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662 (September 1, 2010), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 1. 

11The Assan Single Entity consists of Assan 

Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Kibar Dis 

Ticaret A.S., and Ispak Esnek Ambalaj Sanayi A.S. 

See also Initiation Notice, 88 FR at 55. 

12See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

13See also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also 

Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other 

Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 

29, 2023). 

15See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

individual examination as a mandatory 

respondent in this administrative 

review.5 On May 5, 2023, Commerce 

selected ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi Ve 

Ticaret (ASAS) as an additional 

mandatory respondent in this 

administrative review.6

On July 6, 2023, Commerce extended 

the time limit for these preliminary 

results to November 17, 2023.7 On 

November 13, 2023, Commerce, again, 

extended the time limit for these 

preliminary results to November 30, 

2023.8 For a complete description of the 

events between the initiation of the 

administrative review and these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.9

A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as the appendix to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is aluminum foil from Turkey. 

For a full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

We calculated export price and 

constructed export price in accordance 

with section 772 of the Act, and we 

calculated NV in accordance with 

section 773 of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying these preliminary results, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the weighted-average 

dumping margin for companies which 

were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this administrative review, 

Commerce calculated individual 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the Assan Single Entity and ASAS, the 

two mandatory respondents, that are not 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts otherwise available. Because the 

calculated individual weighted-average 

dumping margins are not zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

otherwise available, Commerce 

calculated the rate for non-examined 

companies using a weighted average of 

the weighted-average dumping margins 

calculated for the mandatory 

respondents using each company’s 

publicly-ranged U.S. sales values for the 

merchandise under consideration, 

consistent with the guidance in section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.10

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

September 23, 2021, through October 

31, 2022: 

Producer and/ 

or exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

ASAS Aluminyum 

Sanayi Ve Ticaret ..... 1.33 

Assan Single Entity 11 ... 1.30 

Ilda Pack Ambalaj ......... 1.30 

Panda Aluminyum A.S 1.30 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to interested parties within five days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice.12 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs to Commerce no later 

than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.13 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

five days after the date for filing case 

briefs.14

Interested parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.15 As provided under 

19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 85239 

16We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

17See 19 CFR 351.303. 

18See Administrative Protective Order, Service, 

and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule, 88 FR 

67069 (September 29, 2023). 

19See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

20See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

21See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 22See Order, 86 FR at 62792. 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.16 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. 

All submissions, including case and 

rebuttal briefs, as well as hearing 

requests, should be filed using 

ACCESS.17 An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the established 

deadline. Note that Commerce has 

amended certain of its requirements 

pertaining to the service of documents 

in 19 CFR 351.303(f).18

Final Results of Review 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in written briefs, not later 

than 120 days after the publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register, 

pursuant to 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties 

Upon completion of the final results 

of this administrative review, pursuant 

to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, 

Commerce shall determine, and the U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise covered by this review.19

If an examined respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent) in the final results of this 

review, we intend to calculate an 

importer-specific assessment rate for 

antidumping duties based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for each importer’s examined sales and 

the total entered value of those same 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). For the companies 

identified above that were not selected 

for individual examination, we will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at a rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of review. If the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis in 

the final results of this review, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by either of 

the individually examined respondents 

for which they did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate these entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.20

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

The final results of this administrative 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable.21

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties will be effective upon publication 

in the Federal Register of the notice of 

the final results of this review for all 

shipments of aluminum foil from 

Turkey entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for companies subject to 

this review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

companies not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior completed 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the investigation but the producer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 1.95 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation, 

adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in 

the companion countervailing duty 

investigation.22 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: November 30, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85240 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Mattresses from Indonesia: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2022, 88 FR 37027 (June 6, 2023) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated September 15, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2020– 

2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Mattresses from Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia, 

Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Republic of Turkey, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 

Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order). 

5See the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661 (September 1, 2020). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Cash 

Deposit Rate for Non-Selected Companies,’’ dated 

December 1, 2023. 

8We are treating these companies as a single 

entity for purposes of this review. For a complete 

discussion, see Memorandum, ‘‘Affiliation and 

Collapsing of PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT 

Grantec Jaya Indonesia,’’ dated December 8, 2022. 

9See Appendix II for a list of these companies. 

10See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–26859 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–560–836] 

Mattresses From Indonesia: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT Grantec 

Jaya Indonesia (collectively, Ecos/ 

Grantec) and PT Zinus Global Indonesia 

(Zinus) made sales of subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below normal value (NV) during 

the period of review (POR), November 3, 

2020, through April 30, 2022. 

Commerce further determines that sales 

of subject merchandise made by the 

non-individually examined companies 

were at prices below NV. 

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Johnson or Brian Smith, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4929 or 

(202) 482–1766, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 6, 2023, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. On September 15, 

2023, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the final results of this 

administrative review until December 1, 

2023.2 For a summary of the events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is mattresses from Indonesia. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs filed in this 

administrative review in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is included in 

Appendix I. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade/gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received and our findings at 

verification, we have made changes to 

the margin calculations in the 

Preliminary Results for both Ecos/ 

Grantec and Zinus.5

Rate for Non-Examined Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be determined for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. 

In this review, we calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

8.40 percent and 6.75 percent for Ecos/ 

Grantec and Zinus, respectively. With 

two respondents under individual 

examination, Commerce normally 

calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the 

estimated dumping rates calculated for 

the examined respondents; (B) a simple 

average of the estimated dumping rates 

calculated for the examined 

respondents; and (C) a weighted-average 

of the estimated dumping rates 

calculated for the examined respondents 

using each company’s publicly-ranged 

U.S. sales values for the merchandise 

under consideration. Commerce then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects 

the rates closest to (A) as the most 

appropriate rate for all other producers 

and exporters.6 As a result of this 

comparison, we assigned a dumping 

margin of 7.04 percent to the nonexamined companies.7

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the POR: 

Exporter or producer 

Weighted 

-average 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia/PT 

Grantec Jaya Indonesia 8 .. 8.40 

PT Zinus Global Indonesia ... 6.75 

Non-Examined Companies 9 7.04 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.10

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these final results of 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1