alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF QUORUM HEALTH GROUP,
INC. EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30,
2000 AND THE AUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  436,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (88,239)
<INVENTORY>                                     41,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               451,137
<PP&E>                                       1,245,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 392,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,856,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,212
<BONDS>                                        851,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           713
<OTHER-SE>                                     667,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,856,438
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,762,772
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,357,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               127,631
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,489
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
#### State v. Arbaugh

17644

10/14/96

Affirmed
<pre>

EXHIBIT 10.10  2000 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF PATRICIA SPIGNO

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective the 27th day of
March 2000, by and between Conectisys, Inc., a Colorado corporation
("CONECTISYS"), ("Employer"), and Patricia A. Spigno ("Employee").

The following amendments to the language of the terms noted are hereby amended
as follows:

The amendments are effective March 27, 2000:

I.  Employment and term. Employer hereby employs Employee and Employee hereby
accepts employment from Employer to perform the duties set forth below, for a
term of Five (5) years ending April 1, 2005.

II. Compensation.  Employee shall have an option to purchase up to 500,000
shares of Conectisys Corporation restricted stock under rule 144, at a cost of
$.38 per share. This option shall remain open/exercisable until December 31,
2002. Said Option is renewable by Ms. Spigno for an additional three (3) years.
This is the total extent and number of options granted under this Employment
Agreement and this amendment shall supercede all previous amendments as it
pertains to stock options.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.


Employee: /s/ Patricia A. Spigno
         Patricia A. Spigno


Employer: /s/ Lawrence Muirhead
         Lawrence Muirhead
         Conectisys Corp.
         Chief Technical Officer


Employer: /s/ Robert A. Spigno
         Robert A. Spigno
         Conectisys Corp.
         President & CEO
19713

#### Chang v. Ayabe; Kromm v. Ayabe

December 17, 1996

Order No. 96-47

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 416 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives recognizing community 

water fluoridation as one of the great public health initiatives on its 

70th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 

Mr. SIMPSON (for himself, Mr. COLE, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. GOSAR, Ms. 

SPEIER, Mr. BABIN, Mr. BURGESS, and Mr. HARPER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives recognizing community water fluoridation as one of the great 

public health initiatives on its 70th anniversary. 

Whereas fluoridation of community water supplies is the single most effective public health measure to prevent tooth 

decay; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has 

proclaimed community water fluoridation as one of ten 

great public health achievements of the 20th century; and 

Whereas studies prove water fluoridation continues to be effective in reducing dental decay by at least 25 percent in 

children and adults, even in the of era widespread availVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:54 Sep 11, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR416.IH HR416

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 416 IH 

ability of fluoride from other sources, such as fluoride 

toothpaste: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes community water fluoridation as a vitally important 

3 public health initiative on its 70th anniversary. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,194,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              468,906,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   664,000
<INVENTORY>                                384,207,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           857,643,000
<PP&E>                                      29,237,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,940,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             869,940,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      419,920,000
<BONDS>                                    281,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                116,179,000
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,590,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               869,940,000
<SALES>                                     60,938,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,938,000
<CGS>                                        8,641,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,641,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            37,383,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,548,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,366,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   575,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   791,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MARK DUGAN
, 1
Respondent Below, Appellant,

v.

DIANE DUGAN
, Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § § No. 143, 2023 § § Court Below

— Family Court § of the State of Delaware § § File No. CN22

- 02010 § Petition No. 22

- 08255 § §

Submitted: June 21, 2023 Decided: Jul y 6 , 2023

ORDER

On April 28, 2023 , the appellant, Mark Dugan , filed a notice of appeal from

the Family Court’s order awarding child support

. The Senior Court Clerk directed
Dugan to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by May 15,

2023

. Dugan did not pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

. On June 5, 2023 , the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice , by certified mail, directing
Dugan to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pay
the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

. Postal record s show
delivery of the notice to show cause on June 7, 2023

. A timely response to the notice

to show cause was due on or before June 20, 2023

. To date, Dugan has not

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).2

responded to the notice to show cause , paid the filing fee, or filed a motion to proceed
in forma pauperis

. Dismissal of this appeal is th erefore deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2017

N o. 04

- 17

- 00334

- CV

Louis DORFMAN, K.I. Holdings, Ltd., Sam Myers, JMD Resources, Inc., Billy Cogdell

Bowden, Barbara Stanfield, Stacey Dorman Kivowitz, Julia Dorfman, Mark Dorfman, Samuel

Gra nt Dorfman, Individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of Sam Y. Dorfma,

Appellant s (Cross

- Appellee s)

v.

VICEROY PETROLEUM, LP , 1776 Energy Partners, LLC and Shirley Wiatrek

Appellee s (Cross

- Appellants)

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 08

- 00185

- CVK

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant Viceroy Petroleum, L.P. ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has

this date been received and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to

file the A ppellant’s brief is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to December 4, 2017.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________ ___________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

C lerk of Court

cc: Larissa J. Hood

2135 E Hildebrand Ave

San Antoni o, TX 78209

John F. Carroll

111 West Olmos Drive

San Antonio, TX 78212

Jane M.N. Webre

303 Colorado Street, Suite 2400

Austin, TX 78701

- 2589

Clinton Butler

114 N. Pan na Maria Ave.

Karnes City, TX 78118 Suzanne Taylor

540 South St. Mary's Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

Gary M. Poenisch

206 East Locust Street, Suite 218

San Antonio, TX 78212

Catherine M. Stone

Trinity Plaza II, Suite 900

745 E. Mulberry Avenue

San Antonio, TX 78212

Jon Christian Amberson

2138 Hildebrand Avenue

San Antonio, TX 78209
January 31, 2005

23988

#### Associated Steel Workers, Ltd. v. Miyashiro

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 361 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 361

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the 
 need to explore emerging technologies that are mobile and capable of 
supplying high volumes of sterile, pathogenic-free water, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2015

Mr. Williams submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the 
 need to explore emerging technologies that are mobile and capable of 
supplying high volumes of sterile, pathogenic-free water, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas small communities are severely burdened when the Environmental 
        Protection Agency closes their wastewater treatment plants;
Whereas flood waters can disable wastewater and drinking water facilities;
Whereas natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and earthquakes, can 
        leave entire cities without power and, therefore, without potable water; 
        and
Whereas due to the growing population of the United States, there are more 
        pathogens entering the Nation's water systems: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
in order to respond to situations in which water systems are closed as 
a result of Environmental Protection Agency induced shutdowns, disease 
outbreaks, epidemics, pandemics, or natural disasters, the 
Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Homeland Security 
should explore emerging technologies that are mobile and capable of 
supplying affected communities and hospitals with high volumes of 
sterile, pathogenic-free water.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11a

                           ARGUSS HOLDINGS, INC.
           STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                                                      Nine Months Ended
                                              Sept. 30, 1997    Sept. 30, 1996

     NET INCOME (LOSS)                            $2,002,000        $(126,000)

     PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

     WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
     OUTSTANDING                                   7,395,000        1,700,000

     STOCK OPTIONS                                   276,000                -



                                                   7,671,000        1,700,000

     NET INCOME (LOSS)PER SHARE                         $.26           $(.07)

                                                     Three Months Ended
                                              Sept. 30, 1997   Sept. 30, 1996

     NET INCOME                                     $610,000         $136,000

     PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

     WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
     OUTSTANDING                                   7,644,000        1,700,000

     STOCK OPTIONS                                   373,000                -

                                                   8,017,000        1,700,000

     NET INCOME PER SHARE                               $.08             $.08
67 P.3d 830

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

March 31, 2003

24175, 24176, 24177

#### State v. Wykes

Affirmed
#### Stephens *v.*Fitzgerald *et al.*

No. 4705.

February 19, 1926.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Hutcheson. Clayton superior court. December 17, 1924.

*0. J. Coogler*and *J. K. Jordan,*for plaintiff.

*■Mundy & Wright,*for defendants.

Appeal and Error 4 O. J. p. 803, n. 87.

Russell, O. J.

The exercise of the discretion of the judge in granting or refusing a temporary injunction upon interlocutory hearing will not be controlled, unless it is manifest that there has been an abuse of discretion. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 119 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-79, CP2024-81.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26817 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
February 3, 2006

26951

#### State v. Shimabukuro

Affirmed
FELIX STORCH, INC. 

770 GARRISON AVE. 

BRONX, NY 10474 

Building Technologies Program 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Test Procedure Waiver 

1000 Independence Ave., SW 

Mailstop EE-2J 

Washington, DC 20585-0121 

Transmittal Letter: 

December 1 7, 2013 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

Enclosed please find: 

Phone: 718-893-3900 

Fax: 718-842-3093 

e-mail: paul@summitappliance.com 

3 copies of Felix Storch, Inc. Petition for Waiver for test procedures dated Dec. 17, 2013 

Certification that copies were mailed to identified competitors with the names and 

addresses of the competitors. 

A copy of the cover letter sent to those competitors advising them of their right to submit 

comments to DOE. 

Please feel free to contact the undersigned for any questions; 

y}.(:t-/1 

Paul StorY fl) 

President
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1296 

CA 12-00939 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AXA 

NETWORK, LLC AND AXA ADVISORS, LLC, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD KALINA, PATRICK LYNCH, CARL DATTELLAS, 

GARY CRONISER, WILLIAM ZAIKA, CHRISTOPHER KEEGAN 

AND DIVERSIFIED WEALTH STRATEGIES, LLC, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

PADUANO & WEINTRAUB, NEW YORK CITY (LEONARD WEINTRAUB OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JOHN T. MCCANN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John

C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered February 29, 2012. The order, among

other things, denied the motion of defendants for leave to reargue and

granted the cross motion of plaintiffs to compel discovery.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as 

it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is

modified on the law by denying the cross motion and as modified the

order is affirmed without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in AXA Equit. Life Ins. Co. v Kalina ([appeal

No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 21, 2012]). 

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS*

I, Matthew O'Toole, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Hockey Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

       a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

       b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

       c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

       a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

       b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  November 11, 2003

                                                  /s/ Matthew O'Toole
                                             --------------------------------
                                                     Matthew O'Toole
                                                 Chief Executive Officer