alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75826, 333-01273, 333-03131, 333,18001, 333-76338, 333-109263, and 333-130741) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58742, 33-76652, 33-94730, 333-24969, 33-94736, 333-40315, 333-48911, 333-40572, 333-104094, 333-104095, 333-115921,
333-127987, and 333-137848) of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated December 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected Financial Data in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts            
|December 7, 2006
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Tribal Relations

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS works with Native American Tribes to protect agriculture and natural

resources. We also provide agricultural assistance to Tribes. We aim to strengthen

agricultural networks while building a future where history is acknowledged and

sovereignty, ancestral heritage, and cultural values are respected.
Each Tribe has the opportunity for government-to-government consultation with

APHIS in developing policies that may have Tribal implications as described by

Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal

Governments.

Featured

About Tribal Relations 

We work alongside Native American Tribes to safeguard their livestock, crops, and

natural resources.

Learn More

Opportunities for Native Youth 

We offer paid internships, summer programs, and other career opportunities for

students and recent graduates of all educational backgrounds.

Learn More
Emergency Response Training for Tribal Nations 

We cooperate with Native American organizations to host training workshops that

help prepare Tribes for animal health and plant health emergencies.

Learn More
Latest News

2/05/24

USDA Invests more than $1.5 Million in Tribal Communities to Fund Plant Protection

Projects

10/24/23

APHIS Announces Funding Opportunity for Tribes and Tribal Organizations to Support

Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Activities

10/22/23

APHIS Announces Funding Opportunity for Tribes and Tribal Organizations to Support

Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Activities

7/10/23

APHIS Announces Listening Sessions on Chronic Wasting Disease Herd Certification

Program Standards

5/30/23

APHIS Announces Funding for Tribal Partners Supporting Farm Bill Animal Disease

Preparedness and Response Activities

View All Updates
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ William J. Campbell

William J. Campbell

Chief Executive Officer



March 16, 2005
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4126



# 
R OBERT M. D REW , a/k/a King Druid,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.

Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-00-39) Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL J. Brian Donnelly, PRICE, PERKINS, LARKIN & DONNELLY, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Robert J. Krask, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Robert M. Drew appeals his jury conviction under the ComputerFraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) for knowingly and intentionally causing the transmission of a program, information, or code, without authorization, which resulted in damage to a protected computer in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1030(a)(5)(A) (West 2000). The court sentenced Drew to fifteen months’ imprisonment. Drew asserts the district court erred by: (1) applying § 1030(a)(5) to his sending large quantities of e-mails to ESI’s server; and (2) improperly instructing the jury as to the elements of § 1030(a)(5). Because Drew failed to raise these claims before the district court, we have reviewed them for plain error, and we find none. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993); Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b). After reviewing the statutory language of § 1030, we conclude Drew’s claim that § 1030 does not apply to his actions must fail. The statute’s unambiguous language clearly criminalizes Drew’s conductof bombarding ESI with massive numbers of e-mail messages. Furthermore, the trial transcript discloses the jury was correctlyinstructed as to the elements of section (a)(5)(A). Therefore, we conclude the district court committed no plain error.Accordingly, we affirm Drew’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. D REW
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,088)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,449
<PP&E>                                          52,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,073
<BONDS>                                        187,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,326
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,000
<SALES>                                        176,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,432
<CGS>                                          131,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (30)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
January 22, 1998

18357

#### Pahk v. Fong; Kong v. Fong; Pahk v. Shin

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part
19144

#### State v. Kealoha

Affirmed
January 16, 1998

18959

#### State v. Hill

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      14,179,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,372,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,651,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,107,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            73,367,000
<PP&E>                                      54,535,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (24,962,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,960,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,999,000
<BONDS>                                     20,029,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 135,169,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,960,000
<SALES>                                     86,960,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,960,000
<CGS>                                       63,855,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,855,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,966,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             464,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,086,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,905,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,181,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,181,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
Amended  and Restated Schedule 2 of Debentures


 




EXHIBIT 4.01

Amended and Restated Schedule 2 to 12.5% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures due on April 21, 2020 issued by Social Reality, Inc. on April 21, 2017 and October 27, 2017.

Schedule 2

FINANCIAL COVENANTS




The Company shall maintain an amount of net cash of $7,000,000 at all times.  If the Company’s net cash amount is less than $7,000,000 at any time, the Company shall immediately deliver written notice thereof to ATW Partners, LLC (“ATW”).  Upon request of ATW, but only upon request of ATW, the Company shall promptly deliver written evidence of the Company’s net cash amount to ATW. As used herein, “net cash” means total cash and cash equivalents of the Company minus all indebtedness of the Company, including, without limitation, indebtedness of the Company held by ATW Partners or its affiliates, “cash equivalents” means financial instruments of high liquidity and safety with an original maturity of three months or less, such as treasury bills and money market funds, and “indebtedness” means, collectively, (i) any liabilities for borrowed money and (ii) all guaranties, endorsements and other contingent obligations in respect of indebtedness of others, whether or not the same are or should be reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet (or the notes thereto), except guaranties by endorsement of negotiable instruments for deposit or collection or similar transactions in the ordinary course of business.
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: October 29, 2015 1 06613

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HUGHES METAYEO, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 22, 2015 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________ Jo M. Katz, Troy, for appellant. Joel E. Abelove, District Attorney, Troy (Vincent J. O'Neill of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McGrath, J.), rendered January 17, 2014 in Rensselaer County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and his plea included a waiver of the right to appeal. He was sentenced as a second violent felony offender, in accordance with the plea agreement, to a prison term of seven years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals. Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our-2- 106613

review of the record and counsel's brief, we disagree. Our review of the record reveals an issue of arguable merit as to whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal that may, in turn, implicate other potential appellate issues (see People v Rabideau, 130 AD3d 1094, 1094-1095 [2015]; People v Phipps, 127 AD3d 1500, 1501 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 970 [2015]; People v Anderson, 120 AD3d 1490, 1491 [2014]). We thus grant counsel's request for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address that issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]). Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
#### State v. Tawney

16673

11/19/96

Affirmed
PPQ Science and Technology Directorate

Document List for P. ramorum-related diagnostics

Document 

Number

Current Version

(effective date) CPHST-Beltsville Document Title

WI-B-T-0-11 

A 

Revision 2

(effective 5-14-2015)

Screening Conventional (Nested and Multiplex) PCR 

assays for detection of Phytophthora ramorum 

WI-B-T-1-6 Revision 8

(effective 10-28- 

2015)

(ITS) Quantitative Multiplex Real-Time PCR 

(qPCR) for Detection of Phytophthora ramorum 

Using a TaqMan System on the Cepheid 

SmartCycler® and the ABI 7900/7000 

WI-B-T-1-7 Revision 3

(effective 2-24-2009)

Elicitin Quantitative Multiplex Real-Time 

PCR (qPCR) for Detection of Phytophthora 

ramorum Using a TaqMan System on the 

Cepheid SmartCycler®

WI-B-T-2-3 Revision 1

(effective 4-6-2015)

Extraction of DNA from Leaf Sub-samples for

Phytophthora spp. PCR analysis

WI-B-T-4-2 Original

(effective 7-20-2007)

Supplemental Instructions for Agdia DAS ELISA for

Phytophthora species

This list is current effective November 7, 2019 and subject to change. The current versions of all the Work 

Instructions are maintained on the APHIS Laboratory Portal (https://www.nahln.org/member/login/) Please 

contact Nicole O’Donahue at nicole.l.odonahue@usda.gov for P. ramorum document-related inquiries.
September 21, 2006

27424

#### State v. Dunbar

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                          71,920
<SECURITIES>                    29,612
<RECEIVABLES>                   39,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    13,345
<INVENTORY>                     15,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               155,294
<PP&E>                          41,524
<DEPRECIATION>                  15,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 184,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           35,319
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                           292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                     148,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   184,505
<SALES>                         62,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 8,762
<CGS>                           37,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   37,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                50,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   469
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (15,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (5,739)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (9,366)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                    (9,366)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.32)
        

					
	  


</TABLE>
SCPW-18-0000426

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

HERMAN-LEE KAOPUA, SR., Petitioner,

vs.

MELINDA K. MENDES, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0007)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Herman-Lee Kaopua,

Sr.’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on May 21, 2018,

court-appointed counsel Melinda Mendes’ responses, filed on July

9, 2018 and July 17, 2018, the respective supporting documents,

and the record, it appears that, on September 19, 2017, the

circuit court entered its “Findings of Fact; Conclusion of Law;

Order Denying Petitioner Herman-Lee Kaopua, Sr.’s Writ of Habeas

Corpus” in S.P.P. No. 12-1-0007, in which the circuit court

denied petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on

September 21, 2012, including the supplemental pleadings. 

Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to an extraordinary writ. 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-18-0000426

02-AUG-2018

03:07 PM
See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999)

(a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not

issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable

right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress

adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 2, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson 

2
47 P.3d 745

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

May 3, 2002

24431

#### State v. Silk

Affirmed
Exhibit 21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant



The Company has four wholly-owned subsidiaries. All others listed are either direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Bank.



|                                           |  |                       
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY                |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|                                           | 
|Mid America Bank, fsb                      |  | United States         
|MAF Developments, Inc.                     |  | Illinois              
|Mid Town Development Corporation           |  | Illinois              
|Equitable Finance Corp.                    |  | Illinois              
|                                           | 
|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE BANK                   |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|                                           | 
|Mid America Investment Services, Inc.      |  | Illinois              
|Mid America Insurance Agency, Inc.         |  | Illinois              
|Mid America Finance Corporation            |  | Illinois              
|Mid America Mortgage Securities, Inc.      |  | Illinois              
|N.W. Financial Corporation                 |  | Illinois              
|Randall Road Development Corporation       |  | Illinois              
|Centre Point Title Services, Inc.          |  | Illinois              
|Reigate Woods Development Corporation      |  | Illinois              
|MAF Realty Co., L.L.C.  III               |  | Delaware              
|MAF Realty Co., L.L.C.  IV                |  | Delaware              
|Mid America Re, Inc.                       |  | Vermont               
|Fidelity Corporation                       |  | Illinois              
|Fidelity Loan Services, Inc.               |  | Illinois              
|St. Francis Investment Corporation         |  | Nevada                
|St. Francis Insurance Services Corporation |  | Wisconsin             
|St. Francis Equity Properties, Inc.        |  | Wisconsin
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  $3,678,000
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           37,496,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                              4,149,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        68,099,000
<PP&E>                                                  36,945,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         200,530,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   78,982,000
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                77,346,000
<OTHER-SE>                                               8,462,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           200,530,000
<SALES>                                                 53,351,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        53,351,000
<CGS>                                                   39,642,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           39,642,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         3,904,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       1,113,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          5,153,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                             2,483,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      2,670,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                             182,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                             2,852,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .22



</TABLE>