AFFIRMED as Modified; Opinion Filed March 26, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00909-CR

No. 05-13-00910-CR

WILLIAM NELLIUS HUBBARD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-26988-Y, F05-26990-Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Myers

William Nellius Hubbard appeals following the adjudication of his guilt for two 

aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon offenses. In six issues, appellant asks us to modify the 

trial court’s judgment to correct several errors. We modify the judgment in each case and affirm 

as modified.

Appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty to two aggravated robbery with a deadly 

weapon offenses. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). Pursuant to plea 

agreements, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant on community 

supervision for ten years. The State later moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant violated 
-2-

the conditions of his community supervision. In a hearing on the motion, appellant pleaded not 

true to one allegation and true to the remaining seventeen allegations. The trial court found all 

of the allegations true, adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment at fifty years’ 

imprisonment in each case.

Appellant argues the judgment in each case should be modified to show (1) he pleaded 

not true to one allegation, (2) the correct name of his attorney at the hearing on the motion to 

adjudicate, and (3) there was no plea bargain agreement. The State agrees the judgments should 

be modified in the manner appellant has requested.

The record shows appellant pleaded not true to allegation (a) in the motions to adjudicate 

and pleaded true to allegations (b) through (u); appellant was represented by Sindhu Alexander at 

the hearing on the motion to adjudicate; and there was no plea agreement in either case. The 

judgments, however, incorrectly recite appellant pleaded true to the motions to adjudicate, was 

represented by Cariann Abramson, and had plea bargain agreements. We sustain appellant’s six 

issues.

We have the power to modify the trial court’s judgments when we have the necessary 

information before us to do so. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b) Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–

28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1991, 

pet. ref’d). Accordingly, we modify the trial court’s judgment in each case to reflect the 

following: (1) the attorney for appellant is Sindhu Alexander; (2) the plea to the motion to 

adjudicate is not true to allegation (a) and true to allegations (b) through (u); and (3) the terms of 

plea bargain are “open.”
-3-

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

/ Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130909F.U05
-4-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM NELLIUS HUBBARD, 

Appellant 

No. 05-13-00909-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F05-26988-Y).

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is 

MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled “Attorney for Defendant” is modified to show “Sindhu Alexander.”

The section entitled “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate” is modified to show “Not TrueAllegation(a) and True-Allegations (b) through (u).”

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.”

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered March 26, 2014.

/ Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
-5-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM NELLIUS HUBBARD, 

Appellant 

No. 05-13-00910-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F05-26990-Y).

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is 

MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled “Attorney for Defendant” is modified to show “Sindhu Alexander.”

The section entitled “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate” is modified to show “Not TrueAllegation(a) and True-Allegations (b) through (u).”

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.”

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered March 26, 2014.

/ LanaMyers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE