alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-017

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Issued April 2019 • Reviewed February 2024

PRACTICAL TIP

To Ensure a 

Wholesome Diet:

l Promptly wrap and

refrigerate or freeze

fresh meat

l Thaw frozen food items

in a refrigerator to help

prevent contamination

l Feed proper portions so

food is eaten before it

begins to spoil

l Remove uneaten food

from the cat’s enclosure

before it spoils

DID YOU KNOW?

Healthy adult big cats (lions, 

tigers, leopards, jaguars, 

cougars) are commonly fasted 

and provided a large bone 

1–2 days a week. It is less 

common to fast smaller or 

very active cats. 

Fasting young, growing, 

underweight, or sick cats may 

slow their growth or hinder 

their ability to fight disease. 

Feeding Nondomestic Cats

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about non-domestic cat health and husbandry. 

Refer to the other topics covered in the series for more information on non-domestic cat care.

The most natural diet for cats is whole prey. Their bodies rely on 

nutrients from the entire prey animal—muscle meat, organs, skin, 

and bones—to maintain health. But a 

whole prey diet may not be practical 

to feed your cats every day. 

WHAT TO FEED YOUR CATS 

TO KEEP THEM HEALTHY

CAUTION! Homemade diets are challenging to create 

with the right balance of nutrients. Meat alone lacks 

the calcium, minerals, and vitamins needed for 

healthy bones and bodies. 

Daily Food Amounts

Daily food amounts will vary based on 

the size, age, health, activity level, and 

reproductive status of the cat as well 

as the fat or caloric content of the diet. 

Leaner diets may require feeding more 

food each day. Feed the cats an amount 

to maintain an optimal body condition. 

Underfed cats may 

have a tucked-up 

abdomen with 

obvious ribs and/

or spine. Overfed 

cats may have a 

rotund abdomen 

and are more likely 

to develop joint 

problems that 

impact mobility or 

pressure sores most 

frequently seen on 

the hips and elbows. 

OBVIOUS SPINE

TUCKED-UP

OBVIOUS RIBS ABDOMEN

One good approach is to feed 

a commercial diet designed 

for nondomestic cats and offer 

whole prey or bones regularly. 

This combination will give 

your cats the right balance 

of nutrients and takes the 

guesswork out of providing a 

balanced diet. Offering bones 

also helps to maintain 

dental health.

ROTUND

 ABDOMEN
January 29, 2001

22935

#### Garcia v. Administrative Director of Court, State of Hawai'i

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DEC. 31,
1999 FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,855
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           320
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,249)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,855
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,076)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)



</TABLE>
October 9, 2003

23820

#### State v. Batalona

Affirmed
Opinion issued September 26, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00319-CV

———————————

ANGELA D. DOWLING-PEREZ, Appellant

V.

LEGACY AT CYPRESS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1200767

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this forcible-detainer action, appellant, Angela D. Dowling-Perez, 

proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the judgment and writ of possession 

granting possession of certain real property to appellee, Legacy at Cypress. 

We dismiss the appeal as moot.
2

The only issue in a forcible-detainer action is the right to actual possession of 

the subject property, and the merits of any title dispute shall not be adjudicated. See

Tellez v. Rodriguez, 612 S.W.3d 707, 709 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, 

no pet.) (citing TEX. R. CIV. P. 510.3(e)). An appeal from a forcible-detainer action 

becomes moot if the appellant is no longer in possession of the property, unless the 

appellant holds and asserts “a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual

possession” of the property. See Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of the City of San Antonio,

198 S.W.3d 782, 786–87 (Tex. 2006); Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass’n, 349 

S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.); Gallien v. Fed. 

Home Loan Mortg. Corp., No. 01-07-00075-CV, 2008 WL 4670465, at *2–4 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 23, 2008, pet. dism’d w.o.j.) (mem. op.).

On May 3, 2023, appellee filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that this appeal 

is moot because the writ of possession was executed, “[a]ppellant was dispossessed 

of the lease[d] premises on March 22, 2023 when [the] writ of possession was 

executed,” and possession was “returned . . . back to” appellee. Appellant did not 

respond to appellee’s motion to dismiss but has filed an appellant’s “brief.” 

However, we conclude that appellant’s “brief” fails to assert a potentially 

meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property. See

Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768; see also Soza v. Fed. 

Home Loan Mortg. Corp., No. 01-11-00568-CV, 2013 WL 3148616, at *1 (Tex. 
3

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 18, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating appellant who 

failed to respond to appellee’s motion to dismiss had failed to assert potentially 

meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession).

Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal as moot. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); see also Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 785, 787, 790;

Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 769; Bey v. ASD Fin., Inc., No. 05-14-00534-CV, 2014 WL 

4180933, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 11, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing 

appeal of forcible detainer action as moot because appellant no longer possessed 

property at issue). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

USDA Reminds Stakeholders to

Submit PPA-7721 Suggestions by

August 9, 2023, for the Plant Pest

and Disease Management and

Disaster Prevention Program

Print

The open period to submit suggestions for fiscal year (FY) 2024 Plant Protection Act

Section 7721 (PPA 7721) Plant Pest and Disease Management and Disaster

Prevention Program (PPDMDPP) funding closes on  August 9, 2023, at 7:00 pm

eastern time. The PPDMDPP open period is one week longer this year, to allow

stakeholders ample time to submit suggestions into the new PPA 7721 suggestion

platform. Through the PPDMDPP, APHIS provides funding to strengthen and

safeguard the nation’s agricultural infrastructure. Visit www.aphis.usda.gov/ppaprojects to get resources and guidance for potential cooperators, including the FY

2024 Implementation Plan, templates, help session webinar PowerPoint, how to

videos, frequently asked questions and more.  

A general audience help session webinar is scheduled for July 12 at 1:00 pm

eastern time.

A tribal audience focused help session webinar is scheduled for July 17th at

1:00 pm eastern time.    
Information on these webinars is also available on the web site above. 

Access the PPA 7721 PPDMDPP Suggestion Submission site here.    

Also, the open period to apply for National Clean Plant Network (NCPN) program

funding will close on September 6, 2023. USDA encourages stakeholders interested

in learning more about the NCPN program to visit the NCPN website. NCPN provides

high-quality propagative plant material free of plant pathogens to help U.S. specialty

crop growers compete in the global market. 

Please subscribe to the Plant Protection Act 7721 topic in the APHIS Stakeholder

Registry to receive email updates.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 20, 2023

No. 04-22-00561-CR

William Huizar WILSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-03-0075-CRA

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time, Appellant’s brief was 

due on January 17, 2023. On the due date, Appellant filed a motion for another thirty-day 

extension of time to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is granted. Appellant’s brief is due on February 16, 2023. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(d). Any further motion for extension of time to file the brief may be disfavored.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# C_2019093EN.01002001.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 6 July 2018 — Fluctus s.r.o. and Others

(Case C-444/18)

(2019/C 93/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Fluctus s.r.o., Fluentum s.r.o., SD

Respondent authority: Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark

Other party: Finanzpolizei

By order of 9 January 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held as follows:

The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Regional Administrative Court, Styria) (Austria) by decision of 2 July 2018 is manifestly inadmissible.

---
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

European Larch Canker

Last Modified: 

Print

Andrej Kunca, National Forest Centre - Slovakia, Bugwood

European larch canker is a serious plant disease caused by the fungus Lachnellula

willkommii. Once introduced, it attacks and spreads among all species of larch trees

(Larix spp.). The disease causes large numbers of cankers to form on the branches

and trunks of infected trees, eventually killing them.
European larch canker is established in Europe and present in several other

countries. In North America, it is only found in areas of Canada and nearby counties

in Maine, where it was first detected in 1981. U.S. and Canadian regulations and

trade restrictions help keep this disease from spreading further.

Controlling European Larch Canker

Current Status

In the United States, European larch canker is confined to Hancock, Knox, Lincoln,

Waldo, and Washington Counties in Maine.

Maps

Regulated Area (1.04 MB) Map

European Larch Canker Quarantine Areas in Maine

European Larch Canker Quarantine Area in Maine and Canada

APHIS' Response

APHIS and the State of Maine carry out surveys, enforce regulations, and conduct

public outreach to mitigate the impacts and spread of European larch canker.

Together we restrict trade and transport of larch (Larix and Pseudolarix spp.),

including logs, pulpwood, branches, twigs, and bark-bearing products made from

larch (seeds are exempt). Several counties in Maine are under federal and State

quarantines for the disease.

Regulatory Information

Regulated Articles (153.14 KB)

Regulated Areas (168.12 KB)

7 CFR 301.91

Maine Department of Agriculture Conservation and Forestry, Forest Health

Division

Contact Us
Kathryn Bronsky

National Policy Manager

Email: kathryn.e.bronsky@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-2147
#### Miller v. Mikami

15919

2/28/95

Vacated and Remanded
24672

#### GECC Financial Corp. v. Chang

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.5


 


fourth AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
fourth Amendment (THE “FOURTH AMENDMENT”) DATED July 27, 2018,
shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF FEBRUARY
22, 2013 and AS amended on july 31, 2013 (the “first amendment”), JULY 27,
2015 (the “second amendment”), AND JULY 20, 2017 (THE “THIRD AMENDMENT”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING
SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”) AND JANE HSIAO (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT,
THE SECOND AMENDMENT, THE THIRD AMENDMENT, AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on February 22, 2013;


 


WHEREAS, on July
20, 2017, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
wish to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2018 to July 31, 2020.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Fourth Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Fourth Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Fourth Amendment and the Amended Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof
and supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 



    	 



    	 



     


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Fourth Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 


6. Counterparts.
This Fourth Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Fourth Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 27th day of July, 2018.


 


	 	 	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	
        /s/ James J. Martin

        

	 	 	 	Name:	
        James J. Martin

        

	 	 	 	Title:	
        Chief Financial Officer

        

	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
        /s/ Jane Hsiao, Ph.D.

        
	 	 	 
	
        Name:

        
	Jane Hsiao, Ph.D.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL MANAGER
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
 
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Linda J. Haines, Principal Financial Manager of Nutrition
Management Services Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to her knowledge, that:
 
 The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of the
Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
      Linda J. HainesLinda
      J. HainesPrincipal
      Financial Manager
 
 November
19, 2008
Recelved:19H339B119

To Fourth Courts of Appeals Page 2 of 2015-08-06 07:12 19 (GMT)

Aus 2015 02:21am P002

19143398119 From

Forth Courts Of

04-15-OCW'IO- -CV

August 6,2015

Joe JaniG Gomez VS Mr Thomas Dashelll

Emergency Motion to Reconder Slay Of Writ Of Possession

We ask For the Forth Courts of Appeals to reconsider Stay Writ Of Possession As our

rent has been paid to date MR Thomas Dashiell has refused to except rent payments

And has refused to refund any monies for deposit and make any repairs to Apartment

Mr Dashslell also failed to sever proper notice for eviction notice And Had

full knowledge of rent being current And stale Judge Presslerwas aware rent was

current

At time court was held May 21,2015 As pre Texas slate Law If rent is current Landlord

must refile and server proper notice of evlclion

Mr Dasheill has made consensus for late payments for other tenants and

has excepted late payment on several occasions from us But Mr Dashelll and Mr Eddie

Voight have made it clear they do not want anyone of Mexican Origin Quote you all

need to go back io Mexico You people are taking American jobs and are dirty

As pre Judge Pressler QouteJanle Mr Dasheill is being prejudice again

you nd your husband And advice you to file an Appeal.

We pray that The Fouth Courts of Appeal will please reconsider.

Emergency MoSion Of Writ Of Possession

SIncerly

Joe Janie Gomez

CO
Received:19143398H9 Aug 2015 02:21 an P001

To: Fourth Courts of Appeals Page1of2 2015-08-06 07:12:19 (GMT) 19143398119 From:

FAX COVER SHEET

TO

COMPANY

FAXNUMBER

FROM

DATE

RE

COVER MESSAGE

Fourth Courts ofAppeals

12103352762

2015-08-06 07:11:16 GMT

UNKNOWN

att: Ross

WWW EFAX.COM
EXHIBIT 32.1



GENAERA CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genaera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roy C. Levitt, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Roy C. Levitt                    
|Roy C. Levitt, M.D.                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 6, 2005
#### State v. Alosio

22848

01/18/2001

Affirmed
• 


gablepr 

March 14, 2012 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S . DepaIiment of TranspOliation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Alaska Airlines' application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of our public relations finn and the defense, biotech, phannaceutical and high-tech 

companies we work with, many with offices in Washington, DC, we fully support the application 

of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport 

(DCA). The service would provide an immediate and major benefit to the frequent travelers who 

nowinust go through Dulles, or Baltimore if they are trying to watch their budgets. 

SaIl Diego to Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities. To make matters worse, 

there is the cost of taxi service from Dulles to downtown Washington ($60 each way) and the 

wasted time. Beyond the private sector, San Diego has the most active-duty military personnel of 

any region in our country. San Diego's significant Defense Department presence needs the quick 

access to the Pentagon that nonstop air service can provide. 

Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, 

DC. Gable PRjoins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego 

Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San 

Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of AJaska Airlines' application for San Diego 

- DCA slots. 

Sincerely, 

591 cam ino de la reina 1suite 730 I san diego, ca 92108 1phone 619.284 .17141 fax 619.299.1030 1 results@gablepr.com 1www.gablepr.com
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


Date:  May 12, 2004                      /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                         Title:   Chief Executive Officer

                                         A  signed   original  of  this  written
                                         statement  required  by Section 906 has
                                         been  provided  to CNL Income Fund XII,
                                         Ltd. and will be retained by CNL Income
                                         Fund XII,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to the
                                         Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
                                         its staff upon request.