alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                           EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              ------------------------
                                                                 1999          1998
                                                              -----------   ----------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
                                                                            (RESTATED)
BASIC EARNINGS(LOSS)PER COMMON SHARE:

     Net income (loss)......................................  $   791,000   (2,156,000)
     Less: Accrued preferred dividends......................   (1,541,000)           -
                                                              -----------   ----------
     Net income (loss) available to common stockholders.....  $  (750,000)  (2,156,000)

     Average common shares outstanding......................   31,009,000   30,977,000
                                                              -----------   ----------
     Basic earnings (loss) per common share.................  $     (0.02)       (0.07)
                                                              ===========   ==========

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:

     Net income (loss) for calculating diluted
       earnings (loss) per common share.....................  $  (750,000)  (2,156,000)
     Adjust net income (loss) to add back the after-tax
      amount
       of interest recognized in the period associated
       with the convertible subordinated notes..............            -            -
                                                              -----------   ----------
     Adjusted diluted net income (loss).....................  $  (750,000)  (2,156,000)
                                                              -----------   ----------

     Average common shares outstanding......................   31,009,000   30,977,000
     Add exercise of options and warrants...................            -            -
     Convertible subordinated notes.........................            -            -
                                                              -----------   ----------
     Diluted shares outstanding.............................   31,009,000   30,977,000
                                                              -----------   ----------
     Diluted earnings (loss) per common share...............  $     (0.02)       (0.07)
                                                              ===========   ==========
</TABLE>

                                       1
Item_4_1_13_Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (Chapter 13.2.) / page 1

Annex 18

CHAPTER 13.2.INFECTION WITH PATHOGENIC RABBIT LAGOVIRUSES (RABBIT HAEMORRHAGIC DISEASE)

**Article 13.2.1.**

General provisions

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) is defined as an *infection* of leporids with *Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus type 1* (RHDV) ~~and~~or *Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus type 2* (RHDV2) (hereafter ‘pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses’).

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses:

1)antigen or nucleic acid specific to pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses has been detected in a sample from a leporid showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*; or

2)antibodies specific to pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses, which are not the consequence of *vaccination*, have been detected in a sample from a leporid showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*.

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, the *infective period* for ~~rabbit haemorrhagic disease (~~RHD~~)~~ shall be 60 days.

Standards for ~~diagnostic tests~~diagnosis and vaccines, as well as information on the epidemiology, are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*.

**Article 13.2.2.**

Country free from RHD ~~free country~~

A country may be considered free from RHD when it has been demonstrated~~shown~~that no *case* has occurred~~the disease has not been present~~ for at least the past 12 months~~one year~~, that no *vaccination* has been carried out in the past~~previous~~ 12 months, and that virological or serological*surveillance*~~surveys~~ in both domestic and *wild*~~rabbits~~ leporids have confirmed the absence of the*infection*~~disease~~.

This period may be reduced to six months after the last *case*has been destroyed~~eliminated~~ and *disinfection*procedures have been completed in countries adopting a *stamping-out policy*, and where~~the~~ serological*surveillance*~~surveys~~ confirmed that no *case*~~the disease had not~~occurred in the *wild*~~rabbits~~ leporids.

[...]

____________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023*

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2024	1
#### State v. Napulou

17653

5/20/97

Denied

85 Hawai'i 49, 936 P.2d 1297
925 P.2d 374

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Higa v. Lino

16166

9/30/96

Denied

82 Hawai'i 535, 923 P.2d 952
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          6,237,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,609,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,595,000
<INVENTORY>                                    15,767,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,675,000
<PP&E>                                         12,213,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                151,247,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,253,000
<BONDS>                                        74,330,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           21,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,581,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  151,247,000
<SALES>                                        63,624,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63,624,000
<CGS>                                          34,742,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,742,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,726,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,504,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,092,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,153,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   943,000
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (210,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 333-59334, 333-49262, 333-92129, 333-69923 and 33-12445 of ACTV, Inc.
on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-58486, 333-54038,
333-91603, 333-06623 and 33-63181 of ACTV, Inc on Form S-8 of our report
dated April 1, 2002 (September 23, 2002 as to the effects of the
restatement as discussed in Note 21) (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company's
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 discussed
in Note 2 and the restatement discussed in Note 21), appearing in this
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ACTV, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2001.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
November 14, 2002
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-009

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

Options for Meeting Social Needs of Primates 

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to help with promoting psychological well-being in primates. 

Topics covered in the series include social grouping, supporting species-typical activities, and special considerations. 

SOCIAL HOUSING

In most cases, stable social 

housing with one or more 

partners of the same species is 

the simplest and most effective 

way to meet a primate’s 

social needs. Having the right 

companions that allow them to 

engage in species-typical social 

behaviors is very important to 

their overall well-being.

DID YOU KNOW?

Meeting your primates’ social 

needs is a key part of promoting 

their psychological well-being. If 

you are unsure of how to provide for 

their social needs, here are some 

questions to get started:

l Are your primates socially

housed?

l How are animals introduced to

new partners or groups?

l If animals must be separated, 

what is done to make this less

stressful for the animal?

l If a primate does not have a full-time

social partner or group, why not?

l For those primates without a

social partner or group, how are

their social needs met?

PRACTICAL TIP

When assessing primates 

housed with other species, look 

for positive signs of interest between 

enclosure mates. One example would 

be both animals choosing to spend 

time near each other.

Just living in the same enclosure 

without aggression does not mean 

that the grouping meets either 

animal’s social needs. In fact, it may 

be that the animals are avoiding each 

other, which could indicate that the 

pairing is a source of stress rather 

than benefiting either animal. 

What If a Primate 

Must Be Housed Alone? 

Companionship is very important 

to most primates, so you will need 

to consider whether your primate 

truly needs to be alone. But finding 

appropriate social partners can be 

a challenge. Some animals may be 

too aggressive or debilitated to safely 

house them with a partner. 

Primates that must be housed 

alone may benefit from human 

companionship through regular 

positive interaction. 

OTHER OPTIONS

When stable social housing with the same 

species is not possible, you may be able to 

meet your primate’s social needs in other 

ways. For example, you can try housing your 

primate with: 

l Protected contact with others, such as through a

mesh panel

l Intermittent social contact or scheduled social

interactions

l A different but compatible species of primate

l Another type of animal that is compatible
#### Gerald Davis, Appellant, *v.*Howard Bisgeier, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 26, 1958.

*Gerald Davis,*appellant in person.

*John J. O’Connor*and *Richard H. Huber*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant is obviously guilty of not responding to the notice of examination and relying on the reluctance of the court to strike his answer without giving him an additional chance to appear. A default deliberately incurred should not be opened without the imposition of costs. *(Petersdorf*v. *O’Hagan,*286 App. Div. 1100.)

The order should be modified by imposing $10 costs of motion and as so modified affirmed, with $10 costs.

Concur — Heoht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Order modified, etc.
40 P.3d 972

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

December 27, 2001

23105

#### State v. Augustin

Affirmed
#### In re SUFFICIENCY OF INITIATIVE PETITION, 1974-1, CANADIAN COUNTY, State of Oklahoma, For the Purpose of Creating a County Department of Health.

No. 48038.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 15, 1975.

*679Fogg, Fogg & Howard by John C. Howard, El Reno, for the proponents.

Earl E. Goerke, Dist. Atty. by Richard D. Strubhar, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Reno, for Frances C. Bremseth, County Clerk, Canadian County, Okl.

LAVENDER, Justice:

The initiative petition circulated in Canadian County, Oklahoma, numbered 74-1, pursuant to the provisions of 63 O.S.1971, §§ 1-223 and 1-224, was made the subject of an application to this Court by the proponents of such petition for certification of the number of presumptively valid signatures subscribed to the counterparts of said petition. 34 O.S.Supp.1974 § 8.

This Court by order entered January 9, 1975, issued to the County Clerk of Canadian County determined the number of presumptively valid signatures appearing on the petition and its counterparts to be 2,746. It directed that official to discharge the duties incumbent on her under the provisions of 34 O.S.Supp.1974 § 8. The County Clerk thereupon found and decided the initiative petition was pre-filed in her office April 25, 1974, and the several circulated counterparts were thereafter returned and filed in her office on July 8, 1974. She determined the necessary number of signatures of qualified voters required to cause the proposed measure to be submitted to the electorate of Canadian County to be 1,383, a number constituting 16% of the total number of votes cast at the last general election next preceding the filing of the initiative petition in Canadian County for the state office receiving the highest number of votes at such election in that county. Notice, as ordered, was given by publication which included a determination of the apparent sufficiency of the initiative petition.

This matter was referred to James D. Giles, Referee of this Court. The Referee has examined the records of this Court and found no protest to the sufficiency of the initiative petition and no objection to the count has been filed as allowed under Section 8, supra.

In the absence of any such protest or objection, it is the order of the Court that the initiative petition is sufficient in all respects.

Initiative petition held sufficient and valid.

All of the Justices concur.
February 22, 1999

21698

#### Arakawa v. Outrigger Enterprises, Inc.

Affirmed
#### Valiyi v. Diamond Int’l Real Estate

15099

01/07/94

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                 33,040,974
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                          39,944,931
<ALLOWANCES>                           (1,495,206)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       82,660,722
<PP&E>                                155,651,101
<DEPRECIATION>                         (9,543,791)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        325,944,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  31,145,223
<BONDS>                               167,513,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                73,000
<COMMON>                                  883,636
<OTHER-SE>                            120,960,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          325,944,531
<SALES>                               103,417,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      103,417,296
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          65,773,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       17,162,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          801,238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      5,886,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        21,120,652
<INCOME-TAX>                            8,659,468
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    12,452,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           12,452,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.69
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd. at March 31, 1999, and its statement of income
for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  for the three  months  ended March 31,
1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,872,630
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                   869
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         24,611,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,696,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,852,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,311,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,852,393
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               920,205
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                729,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            729,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   729,321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  XI,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore  no values are shown  above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,024,415
<SECURITIES>                                 8,052,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,253,878
<PP&E>                                         145,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,399,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          879,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,746,993
<OTHER-SE>                                (28,227,205)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,399,173
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,266
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,781,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,040,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,526,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,526,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,526,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 01, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 01, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0027. HEALTHCARE STAFFING, INC. v. CHERYL EDENFIELD, AS MOTHER 

AND AS LEGAL GUARDIAN OF QUINCY EDENFIELD, AN INCAPACITATED 

ADULT.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STSV2017000102