alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

        EXHIBIT NO. 10.27 - AMENDMENT DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2002 TO THE MAF
                 BANCORP, INC. STOCK OPTION GAIN DEFERRAL PLAN.


<PAGE>

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                                MAF BANCORP, INC.
                         STOCK OPTION GAIN DEFERRAL PLAN

     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT of the MAF Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Gain Deferral
Plan is made as of the 26th day of February 2002.

     WHEREAS, the Company has adopted a deferred compensation plan known as the
MAF Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Gain Deferral Plan ("Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide additional
flexibility to the Committee thereunder with respect to certain aspects of the
administration of the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

     1. Section 3.3(a) is amended to read as follows:

        "(a) Each Participant may execute one or more deferral election forms as
     set out in the form established by the Committee (a "Deferral Election
     Form"). Each Deferral Election Form shall be treated in accordance with
     Section 4.2. In order to be effective with respect to the exercise of any
     Option, a Deferral Election Form must be executed by the Participant: (i)
     in a calendar year preceding the exercise of such Options; and (ii) at
     least six (6) months prior to the exercise of such Options; provided,
     however, that a Deferral Election Form executed by a Participant during the
     first thirty (30) days following the later of the Effective Date of the
     Plan or the participation commencement date designated by the Committee
     pursuant to Section 3.2 for such Participant, or which is otherwise
     accepted by the Committee in its sole discretion, shall be effective with
     respect to the exercise of Options after the date of such Deferral Election
     Form without regard to clauses (i) and (ii)."

     2. The effective date of this Second Amendment shall be February 26, 2002.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment has been duly executed by the
duly authorized officers of the parties hereto, effective as of the day and year
first above written.



ATTEST/WITNESS:                               MAF BANCORP, INC.

                                              By: /s/ Allen H. Koranda

                                              Name:   Allen H. Koranda
Name:  /s/ Carolyn Pihera

                                              Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Title: Corporate Secretary

                                              Date:   February 26, 2002
H. Res. 299 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 4, 2015. 

Whereas Joseph Robinette ‘‘Beau’’ Biden, III, born in Wilmington, Delaware and a graduate of the University of 

Pennsylvania and Syracuse University law school, served 

our country as an attorney in the Department of Justice 

for seven years, including assisting the nation of Kosovo 

in rebuilding their criminal justice system; 

Whereas Beau Biden served his beloved State of Delaware for 

eight years as Attorney General; 

Whereas Beau Biden joined the Army in 2003 at the age of 

34, rose to the rank of major in the Delaware Army National Guard’s Judge Advocate General Corps, deployed 

to Iraq in 2008 and received the Bronze Star for his 

service; 

Whereas Beau Biden leaves behind a beloved wife, Hallie, 

and two children, Natalie and Hunter; and 

Whereas Beau Biden was the eldest son of the former Senator from Delaware and current Vice President of the 

United States and President of the United States Senate, 

Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 299 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives has heard 

with profound sorrow and deep regret the announcement of 

the untimely death of Joseph Robinette Biden, III. 

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

communicate this resolution to the Senate and transmit a 

copy thereof to the family of the Vice President of the United 

States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
5ERVED 7 All-j~A-sr ~ :w1s-

-_·:-'U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO:RJiSA~{OTFRHANSPORTATfON OFFICE OF HEARINGS ~ EARtNGS 

- •• 

1 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRAztlP"WUG -lt A If: I l .. __ .;;· 

FEDERAL AVIATION 

ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

v. 

SMYRNA AIR CENTER 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA DocketNo. 2014-0685 

Judge J .E. Sullivan 

ORDER AMENDING LITIGATION DATES 

The parties, after conferring and jointly requesting that this Court adjust the litigation 

~)"'\\ dates/Mttfs /L~~~~~ the Motion well taken. 

It is hereby ORDER, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Order settling litigation dates and 

procedures is hereby amended such that: 

1. Expert Disclosu,re dates - Complainant will disclose their expert no later than 

October 1, 2015 and respondent shall follow with October 9, 2015 as their expert disclosure 

deadline. 

2. Deposition dates - All fact witnesses' depositions and expert deposition shall be 

completed by November 6, 2015. 

3. Dispositive Motions- November 16th will be deadline for the filing of dispositive 

motions with all responses due by November 24th. Any replies shall be due no later than 

November 30th. 
4. All other dates and schedules will remain unaffected by entry of this Order. 
I 

I , 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0685 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE ·COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Ryan M. Landers 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAJ(: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Thomas F. Mink, II 

Charles M. Duke 

William M. Leech 

Respondent's Counsel 

P.O. Box 198742 

219 Second Avenue North, Suite 400 

Nashville, TN 37219-8742 

TEL: 615 -256-0138 

FAJ(: 615-730-5997 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAJ(: 202-366-7536 

Smyrna Air Center, Inc. 

Respondent 

c/o Neal Ropp, Accountable Manager 

300 Warpoole Road 

Symma, TN 37167 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 54 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore service 

standards in effect as of July 1, 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. TONKO, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Ms. KAPTUR, 

Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. JOYCE, and Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of 

California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore service standards in effect 

as of July 1, 2012. 

Whereas on January 5, 2015, the United States Postal Service has implemented lower ‘‘service standards’’ to virtually eliminate overnight delivery of first class mail and 

periodicals, and further delay most other mail; 

Whereas delayed mail negatively impacts businesses, hurts 

residents, rural communities and the economy, and drives 

customers away, resulting in lower revenue and worsens 

the Postal Service’s financial situation; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 54 IH 

Whereas robust service standards implemented by the United 

States Postal Service are essential to providing prompt 

and timely delivery of all mail: online purchases, local 

newspapers, newsletters, bill payments, letters, invitations, packages, and medicines: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Postal Service should 

3 take all appropriate measures to restore service standards 

4 in effect as of July 1, 2012. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 11.1

                        INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC.
                 STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Years Ended
                                                            September 30,
                                                   1996         1995         1994
                                                  -------   --------------  -------
<S>                                               <C>          <C>          <C>    
Net income .................................      $ 1,015      $29,653      $ 4,612
                                                  =======      =======      =======
Computation of weighted average common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding:

  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding ............................       17,457       12,128        4,778

  Common equivalent shares from dilutive
    preferred stock ........................           --        2,805        7,829

  Common equivalent shares from dilutive
    common stock options and warrants ......          899        1,470          616

  Common equivalent shares from stock and
    stock options granted during the twelve-
    month period prior to the Company's
    initial public offering ................           --          131          524
                                                  -------      -------      -------
Shares used in per share calculations ......       18,356       16,534       13,747
                                                  =======      =======      =======
Net income per share .......................      $  0.06      $  1.79      $  0.34
                                                  =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12280]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Joan Jonas: Good Night Good Morning” at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

      ( print page 85715)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-26987 Filed 12-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
January 28, 1999

20985

#### Ross v. County of Hawai'i

Affirmed
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-016

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

Primates: Special Needs of Great Apes 

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to help with promoting psychological well-being in primates. 

Topics covered in the series include social grouping, supporting species-typical activities, and special considerations. 

Great apes need extra space 

and opportunities to express 

natural behaviors. 

WHAT BEHAVIORS DO GREAT 

APES NEED TO EXPRESS? DID YOU KNOW?

Choice and control over 

their environments 

is essential for the 

well-being of all great 

apes. You can address 

this by offering them 

many options in their 

enclosures. Examples 

include: access to 

vertical levels; allowing 

free choice to go inside 

or outside, and providing 

space and complexity 

to interact with different 

companions at different 

times. 

Important behaviors for great apes can be a 

little different for each species. Here are a few 

common behaviors to consider:

Social Behavior

Social housing is especially important for the 

psychological well-being of chimpanzees, bonobos, 

and gorillas. In captivity, they need enough space and

the right kind of materials 

to engage in natural social 

behaviors, such as “bluff 

displays” or other actions 

that reinforce their rank in 

the group. They also need 

areas designed for privacy 

and rest (solitary spaces). 

Nest Building

All great apes build nests 

so they have a comfortable 

place to sleep. Many like to 

build a new nest each day. 

Offering them nest-building 

materials (e.g., straw, wood, 

wool, blankets, towels) and 

elevated resting areas 

(e.g., hammocks, shelves) 

are good ways to support 

nest building.

Foraging

Great apes spend 

much of their day 

foraging. Offering 

foods that make 

them work to access 

edible parts (like whole fruits and nuts that need to 

be peeled or broken open) or use tools (like artificial 

termite mounds) gives them mental stimulation and 

a way to express important natural behaviors. Browse 

is another great choice for edible enrichment that 

requires manipulation and processing.

Movement 

and Activity

Great apes are active 

throughout the day in the 

wild. An inactive lifestyle 

in captivity harms both 

their mental and physical 

well-being. Enclosure 

designs for great apes 

should offer the animals 

opportunities and 

motivation to get up and 

move around, explore, 

brachiate (use their arms 

to swing), and climb.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      28,677,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              582,048,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   664,000
<INVENTORY>                                173,565,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           783,626,000
<PP&E>                                      23,211,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,097,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             797,740,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      214,334,000
<BONDS>                                    286,990,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 296,388,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               797,740,000
<SALES>                                    234,038,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           234,038,000
<CGS>                                       22,630,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,630,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            98,591,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            25,163,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          32,620,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             55,034,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                24,490,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                30,544,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors 
MicroTel International, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 
333-74281, 333-71035, 333-69571, 33-22518, 33-72926 and 333-12567) on Form 
S-8 of MicroTel International, Inc. (formerly XCEL Corporation and 
subsidiaries) of our report dated December 13, 1996, relating to the 
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows 
for the year ended September 30, 1996, which report appears in the December 
31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of MicroTel International, Inc. (formerly 
XCEL Corporation and subsidiaries).

                                       KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
March 29, 1999
#### Andrew Ronald TRAEGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-73-136.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 5, 1974.

Frank R. Courbois, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., James L. Swartz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe Crosthwait, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BLISS, Presiding Judge:

Appellant, Andrew Ronald Traeger, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried, and convicted in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, for the offense of Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon. The State presented two witnesses and then rested. The defendant then demurred to the Information which had not been read to the jury as required by statute, requested a directed verdict, and demurred to the evidence. The trial court denied the relief sought. The defendant then rested and again requested the court *400to sustain his demurrer which was overruled. Thereafter, the defendant asked leave to reopen the case for the purpose of the defendant taking the stand on his own behalf. The defendant informed the court that it was only 2:25 p. m., that the defendant’s testimony would not be time consuming and that the State could in no way be prejudiced. The trial court refused to reopen the case and the matter was submitted to the jury. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the defendant was sentenced to a term of five (5) years imprisonment in the state penitentiary.

The sole issue raised by the defendant’s brief urges that the trial court committed reversible error in overruling the defendant’s motion to reopen the case thereby denying the defendant his right to testify in his own behalf. With this contention we agree.

In the early case of Frisby v. State, 5 Okl.Cr. 660, 115 P. 472 (1911), this Court was faced with a very similar situation. In the *Frisby, supra,*case after the State rested the defendant announced that he rested and then interposed a demurrer to the evidence. The demurrer was overruled and the defendant thereupon asked leave to withdraw his announcement and the trial court refused. The defendant then offered to introduce evidence in his own behalf which was also denied by the trial court. On appeal this Court held as follows:

> “* * * When the court had refused the relief asked for, he should have permitted the appellant to offer testimony in his behalf, and we think it was clearly an abuse of discretion to deny him this right. * * *”

In the instant case it is apparent from the record that, should the trial court have granted leave to reopen, the only witness to be called was the defendant; it was still early in the afternoon; the State could have no way been prejudiced; and justice would have been served. Therefore, for the reasons set out above, it is the opinion of this Court that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to allow the defendant to reopen said case, that said abuse of discretion constitutes reversible error in the instant case and that the judgment and sentence is reversed and remanded for new trial.

BRETT, and BUSSEY, TJ., concur.