alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15

                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                  REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT



The Board of Directors
LaserSight Incorporated:

With respect to the registration statements on Form S-8 (nos. 33-96390,
33-52170, 333-16817, 333-16823, 333-62587, 333-62591, 333-84073, 333-84075,
333-42662 and 333-75216) and on Form S-3 (nos. 333-2198, 333-25237, 333-36655,
333-36837, 333-59369, 333-68495, 333-77825, 333-35822, 333-46470, 333-62634 and
333-67616) of LaserSight Incorporated, we acknowledge our awareness of the use
therein of our report dated August 2, 2002 related to our review of interim
financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                        /s/KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
August 14, 2002
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, D. GeoffreyShulman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2)              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:       November 11, 2004 | /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman |                                                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                    | D. Geoffrey Shulman                                                  |
|                                                   |                    | President and Chief Executive Officer (principal  executive officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issuedour reports dated December 13, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, in the Annual Report of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedSeptember 30, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-84402 and 333-42245) and on Forms S-8 (FileNos. 333-163934, 333-95282, 333-3438, 333-26135, 333-44281, 333-50679, 333-76991, 333-33944, 333-56800, 333-84404, 333-101378, 333-115494, 333-144006 and 333-148184). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON, LLP 

San Jose, California 

December 13, 2010
BryanW. Shaw, Ph.D., P.E., Chairman Toby Baker, Commissioner 

# RECEtVED 16 JUL lit PH 3: 

## 51 AIR PERMITS SECTION 

## 6PO-R TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITI Jon Niermann, Commissioner Richard A. Hyde, P.E., ExecutiveDirector

Mr. Ron Curry Regional Administrator Protecting Texas byReducing andPreventing Pollution

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 RE: CommissionWithdrawal of§ u6.uo(a)(5) from the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submittal (TCEQ ProjectNo. 2016-029-SIP-NR).

Dear Mr. Curry: June 22, 2016, theTexas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) voted to withdraw a rule from considerationbythe United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as revision to theTexas State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision that the commission is withdrawing from considerationbythe EPA is 30 TAC Chapter 116, Control ofAir Pollution byPermits for New Construction orModification, Subchapter B, § u6.uo(a)(S) adopted onAugust 9, 2000 as partofProject No. 1999-029B-u6- AI pursuantto Senate Bill 766, 76th Legislature, 1999. Governor George W. Bush submittedthis amendment as a SIP revision to EPA on September 11, 2000. To date, EPA has taken no action on this proposed SIP revision. This withdrawal removes this rule from your consideration at this time. Enclosed is the Commission's Order that enacts this action. Sincerely,

# ~'::h~ Chairman
cc: The Honorable Greg Abbott, Governor ofTexas Mr. Ryan Vise, Office ofBudget, Planning and Policy, Office ofthe Governor Mr. Richard Hyde, Executive Director, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

P.O. Box 13087 • Austin, Texas 78711-3087 • 512-239-1000 • How is our customer service? tceq.texas.govjcustomersurvey printed on recycled paper

# Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

AN ORDER THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS IHEREBYCERTIFY THATTHIS ISATRUE AND CORREt:T COPY OF A TEXAS COMMiSSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DOCUMENT.**l~liiCH** IS FilED iN TYE PERMANENT RECORDS 

## JUL 07 2016

BRIDGET C HAC. CHIEF ClERK TEXAS COMMISSION NENVIROMMENTAL QUALITY 

### withdrawing a rule from consideration as a revision to State Implementation Plan; TCEQ Docket No. 2016- 0307-SIP; Project No. 2016-029-SIP-NR
On June 22, 2016, theTexas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) considered the withdrawal of 30 Tex. Admin. Code § 

### n6.no(a)(s), as adopted by the commission on August 9, 2000, from considerationbythe United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BYTHE COMMISSION that30Tex. Admin. Code § 

### n6.no(a)(S) is herebywithdrawn from submission to EPA as a revision tothe SIP. 

### If any portion of this Order is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competentjurisdiction, the invalidity of any portion shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions.

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Date Sign d
Exhibit 11

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                                                         |  |                             |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ---------
|                                                                                         |  | Year EndedDecember 31, 2008
|Income available to common stockholders                                                  |  | $                           | 2,459,318
|Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |  |                             | 4,970,788
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  | $                           | 0.49     
|Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |  | $                           | 2,459,318
|Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |  |                             | 4,970,788
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  | $                           | 0.49
January 26, 2006

24561

#### Aloha Islandair, Inc. v. Hoshijo

Vacated and Remanded
cik0000885568-ex101_7.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 



 

 

July 27, 2018

 

 

Ms. Allyson Pittman

[Address]

 

 

Subject:  Promotion 

 

Dear Allyson:

 

It is with great pleasure that we offer to you the position of Vice President and Controller with Old Dominion Electric Cooperative. 

 

Effective today, July 27, 2018, you will report to Bryan Rogers, and your salary will be $6,497.08 gross per pay period.  Your responsibilities and salary may be subject to periodic review and modification in accordance with Old Dominion’s operational needs, as they may change over time. Your employment with Old Dominion is at-will and is indefinite. 

 

This offer is made on the condition that you accept this offer by signing and returning the enclosed copy to me and that you agree to commence your duties on July 27, 2018. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Tammy Coburn

Tammy Coburn

Sr. HR Generalist

 

 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY: 

 


			
	
/s/ Allyson Pittman
	
Dated:  07/27/18

	
Allyson Pittman
<PAGE>   1
DAYTON SUPERIOR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         1996          1995           1994
                                                                         ----          ----           ----
<S>                                                                  <C>           <C>            <C>      
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding during the year                                         4,547,527     2,990,847      1,766,700
Common equivalent shares outstanding (a)                               384,645       569,961        255,218
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding                                        4,932,172     3,560,808      2,021,918
                                                                    ========================================

Income (loss) before extraordinary items                                $4,616        $3,705          ($682)
Extraordinary items                                                     (2,314)            0         31,354
                                                                    ----------------------------------------
Net income                                                               2,302         3,705         30,672
Dividends on Redeemable Preferred Shares                                     0          (470)          (361)
Accretion on Redeemable Preferred Shares                                     0          (192)          (136)
Redemption of Preferred Shares in excess of book value                       0        (2,972)             0
                                                                    ========================================
Net income available to common shareholders                             $2,302           $71        $30,175
                                                                    ========================================

Income (loss) per share before extraordinary items                       $0.94         $0.02         ($0.58)
Extraordinary items per share                                            (0.47)         0.00          15.51
                                                                    ========================================
Net income per share                                                     $0.47         $0.02         $14.92
                                                                    ========================================

<FN>

Notes:

(a)       Common equivalent shares are shares issuable upon the exercise of
          stock options and warrants, less the shares that could be purchased
          with the proceeds from the exercise of the options and warrants,
          based on the company's initial public offering price of $13.00 for
          1995 and the company's ending trading price for 1996.
</TABLE>




                                    Page 1
#### State v. St. Clair

25281

05/22/2003

Denied

101 Hawai'i 280, 67 P.3d 779
#### Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. State

26615

12/23/2005

Granted

-Hawai'i-, -P.3d-
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Harold R. Herbst, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of InfoNow Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2005

/s/ Harry R. Herbst
--------------------
Harry R. Herbst
Interim Chief Executive Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12107Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  MICHAEL LILLY (not verified)PermalinkSeptember 27, 2022 - 5:38pmI hope this is a continuing project, with more photos to share with us.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Lyle FRITZ, etc., et al.

No. 17447.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1963.

John O. Garaas, U. S. Atty., for appellant.

Mart Vogel, Fargo, N. D., Attorney for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on stipulation of parties, D.C., 216 F.Supp. 156.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,James G. Thomasch, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) [Not Applicable];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2007 | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    | James G. Thomasch       |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and Related Prospectuses (Forms S-3 No.333-84402, No. 333-42245; and Forms S-8 No. 333-95282, No. 333-3438, No. 333-26135, No. 333-44281, No. 333-50679, No. 333-76991, No. 333-33944, No. 333-56800, No. 333-84404, and No. 333-101378) of our report dated October 28, 2003, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

December 3, 2003
#### State v. Matthews

16794

3/30/95

Affirmed
#### Roger Dallas ROWBOTHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-75-44.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 2, 1976.

ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in *Rowbotham v. Oklahoma,*— U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3218, 49. L. Ed.2d -, has vacated the opinion of this Court affirming the judgment and sentence rendered in the above styled and numbered cause insofar as it left undisturbed the death sentence, and remanded *815this cause for reconsideration of this Court in the light of *Woodson et al. v. North Carolina,*- U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976) and *Roberts v.*Louisiana,-U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 3001, 49 L.Ed.2d- (1976);

AND WHEREAS, this Court has this date, in *Riggs v. Branch,*Okl.Cr., 554 P.2d 823, reconsidered its prior holding in *Rowbotham v. State,*Okl.Cr., 542 P.2d 610, and vacated and set aside that opinion insofar as it is inconsistent with *Riggs v. Branch,*supra.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the judgment and sentence rendered in the District Court, Rogers County, Case No. CRF-74-43, be, and the same is hereby, modified from a sentence of death, to a sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor. The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the Mandate FORTHWITH.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 2nd day of September, 1976.

TOM BRETT, P. J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

C. F. BLISS, Jr., J.
#### State v. Gaspar

17866

1/21/97

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded
18195

#### Dayton v. Budget

Affirmed
142 P.3d 317

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Welck v. SPM Corp.

26226

08/15/2006

Vacated & remanded
#### State v. Amsbary

18639

11/18/96

Affirmed