alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.66A



 Exhibit 10.66A 
  





 
  

	TO:	DAVID M. RAUSCH 

  

	RE:	EXTENSION OF CHANGE OF CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

 Pursuant to Section 1(b) of your
Change of Control Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of August 27, 2014, the term of the Agreement, as stated in Section 1(b) thereof, is hereby extended so that the Agreement, as extended, will end on
November 12, 2018. 
 In all other respects, the Agreement is reaffirmed and remains unchanged. 

Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing this Extension Agreement in the space provided below. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension Agreement is executed in the Company’s name on its behalf as of the day and year shown herein. 

Date: December 6, 2017 
  

			
	KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas D. Hull III

		 	Thomas D. Hull III
		 	Vice President, Finance,
		 	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary


  

	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	  
 /s/ David M. Rausch

	 David M. Rausch

	President, Chief Executive Officer
	  
 DATE: 12/8/2017


 P.O. BOX 1842, STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28687-1842 ● 2700 WEST FRONT STREET, STATESVILLE, NORTH
CAROLINA 28677-2927 
 PHONE XXXXXXXXXX • FAX XXXXXXXXXX
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2015.
    Resolved, That Karen L. Haas of the State of Maryland, be, and is hereby, 
chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That Paul D. Irving of the State of Florida be, and is hereby, 
chosen Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That Ed Cassidy of the State of Connecticut be, and is hereby, 
chosen Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That Father Patrick J. Conroy of the State of Oregon, be, and is 
hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
23099

#### State v. Dickerson

Affirmed
979 P.2d 98

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

October 14, 1998

20929

#### State v. De Feo

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12787Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Doris Graham  (not verified)PermalinkNovember 19, 2023 - 3:35pmSuch a special event! I tell my son that he is privileged to help bring “joy to the world”every Christmas.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the filing by Ionatron, Inc. (the “Company”) of its Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the
      “Report”) I, Kenneth M. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




|(i) | the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(ii)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.




This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial
      Officer of Ionatron, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Ionatron, Inc. and will be retained by Ionatron, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Kenneth M.
              WallaceKenneth M. WallaceChief Financial
              Officer


Date:
      November 9, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 422 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 422

 Honoring the Red Land Little League Team of Lewisberry, Pennsylvania 
for the performance of the team in the 2015 Little League World Series.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2015

Mr. Perry submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the Red Land Little League Team of Lewisberry, Pennsylvania 
for the performance of the team in the 2015 Little League World Series.

Whereas, on Saturday, August 29, 2015, the Red Land Little League team won the 
        United States championship at the Little League Baseball World Series, 
        defeating a versatile and dynamic team from Pearland, Texas, with a 
        walk-off hit in the bottom of the sixth inning to win 3-2;
Whereas, on Sunday, August 30, 2015, the Red Land Little League team competed 
        against the Kitasuna Little League team from Tokyo, Japan, in the 69th 
        Annual Little League World Series championship and set the record for 
        the most runs scored in the first inning with 10 runs;
Whereas the Red Land Little League is the first York County team to win a 
        national Little League championship and the first team from Pennsylvania 
        to win the national Little League championship since 1990;
Whereas the Red Land Little League team is comprised of: Camden Walter, Braden 
        Kolmansberger, Dylan Rodenhaber, Adam Cramer, Jaden Henline, Chayton 
        Krauss, Kaden Peifer, Cole Wagner, Zack Sooy, Jake Cubbler, Jarrett 
        Wisman, Bailey Wirt, and Ethan Phillips;
Whereas the Red Land Little League team is managed by Tom Peifer and coached by 
        J.K. Kolmansberger and Bret Wagner, among others; and
Whereas the Red Land Little League team has brought tremendous excitement, 
        pride, and honor to the city of Lewisberry, the county of York, the 
        Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the United States: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates and honors the Red Land Little League 
        team and its loyal fans, affectionately known as the ``Red 
        Sea'', on the performance of the team at the 69th Little League 
        World Series championship;
            (2) recognizes and commends the hard work, dedication, 
        determination, and commitment to excellence of the members, 
        parents, families, coaches, and managers of the team; and
            (3) recognizes and commends the people of Lewisberry, 
        Pennsylvania, and the surrounding area for their outstanding 
        loyalty, support, and countless hours of volunteerism for the 
        Red Land Little League team throughout the season.
                                 <all>
```
99 P.3d 615

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

October 21, 2004

25863

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
Order entered October 15, 2012



### In The 

# .’lgift igtri t of igexa at aRag

No. 05-12-01373-CV IN RE JUSTIN LEE ASKEW, Relator On Appeal from the 204th District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F05-51334-Q



### ORDER The Court has before it relator’s October 9, 2012 petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests that real party in interest, The State of Texas, file a response by October 23, 2012.

JUSTICE
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed September 4, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D 2 3

- 0 8 39 Lower Tribunal No. F14

- 16526A

________________

Albert Louis Barnes , Appellant,

vs.
The State of Florida , Appellee.

An Appeal from the C ircuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, C harl es Johnson , Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner , Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before S C A L E S , MIL L E R and BOKO R , JJ.
PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Miller v. State , 161 So. 3d 354, 363

- 64 (Fla. 2015) (holding, consistent with Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984), that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must satisfy two criteria : counsel’s deficient performance and prejudice to the defendant) ; Melton v.
State , 949 So. 2d 994, 1004 (Fla. 200 6 ) (holding that counsel is not deficient in failing to call witnesses who refuse to cooperate with the defense and are
therefore unavailable for trial; Occhicone v. State , 768 So. 2d 1037, 1048 (Fla. 2000) (“[S]trategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of
counsel if alternative c ourses have been considered and rejected and counsel’s decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct.”).
Exhibit 13.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the annual report on Form 20-F of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd.
  /s/ Alan HartsliefAlan HartsliefChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Lochland Holdings LLC v. Brindley

24171

01/22/2004

Vacated and remanded
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MARK DUGAN,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

DIANE DUGAN,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 143, 2023

§

§ Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN22-02010

§ Petition No. 22-08255

§

§

Submitted: June 21, 2023

Decided: July 6, 2023

ORDER

On April 28, 2023, the appellant, Mark Dugan, filed a notice of appeal from 

the Family Court’s order awarding child support. The Senior Court Clerk directed 

Dugan to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by May 15, 

2023. Dugan did not pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 

On June 5, 2023, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing 

Dugan to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pay 

the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Postal records show 

delivery of the notice to show cause on June 7, 2023. A timely response to the notice 

to show cause was due on or before June 20, 2023. To date, Dugan has not 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

responded to the notice to show cause, paid the filing fee, or filed a motion to proceed 

in forma pauperis. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
EX-10.4


 Exhibit 10.4 

VERITONE, INC. 2018 PERFORMANCE-BASED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

FORM OF AWARD AGREEMENT 
 Notice is hereby
given of the following Performance Option grant (the “Award”) to purchase shares of the Common Stock of Veritone, Inc. (the “Corporation”) under the Veritone, Inc. 2018 Performance-Based Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”): 
 Participant: [NAME] 

Grant Date: [DATE] 
 Exercise Price: $[##.##] per
share 
 Number of Performance Option Shares: [#] shares of Common Stock 

Scheduled Expiration Date: [DATE] 
 Type of Award:
Performance Option 
 Exercisability: The Award shall become and remain exercisable as provided in the Plan. 

Forfeiture: The Award shall be forfeited as provided in the Plan. 

Definitions: All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Award Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan. 

The Participant understands and agrees that the Award is granted subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Participant further agrees to be
bound by the terms of the Plan. A copy of the Plan, which is publicly filed, is available upon request made to the Corporate Secretary at the Corporation’s principal offices. This Award Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire contract
between the parties hereto with regard to the subject matter hereof. This Award Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and shall in all respects be construed in conformity with the terms of the Plan. The Participant hereby agrees
to take whatever additional action and execute whatever additional documents the Corporation may deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out or effect one or more of the obligations or restrictions imposed on either the Participant or any
Purchased Shares pursuant to the provisions of the Plan. 
  

					
	VERITONE, INC.	 	


 
					
			
	By: 	 	 	 	


 
					
	Name:	 	 	 	


 
					
	Title:	 	 	 	


  

					
	
                    
     
	 	
	[NAME]
27726

#### State v. Santiago

Affirmed and Reversed
Order entered October 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00776-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF O.J.O. AND E.J.O., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-23995

ORDER

Before the Court is the September 27, 2019 request of Janet Saavedra, Official Court 

Reporter for the 254th Judicial District Court, for a sixty-day extension of time to file the 

reporter’s record. Ms. Saavedra explains that she will be on family leave for the month of 

October. We GRANT the motion to the extent that Ms. Saavedra shall file the reporter’s record 

by November 26, 2019. To the extent that Ms. Saavedra request guidance as to whether all 

requested records are needed for the appeal, we DENY the motion. We caution Ms. Saavedra 

that further extension requests will be strongly disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2018392EN.01000302.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/3

---

Appeal brought on 10 April 2018 by Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2018 in Case T-795/16: Krasnyiy oktyabr v EUIPO

(Case C-248/18 P)

(2018/C 392/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO (represented by: O. Spuhler, M. Geitz, Rechtsanwälte, J. Stock, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’

By order of 11 September 2018 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
# C_2016202EN.01034901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/349 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/349

---

35.   Declaration on Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference believes that Article 194 does not affect the right of the Member States to take the necessary measures to ensure their energy supply under the conditions provided for in Article 347.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51035 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO ORTEGA-JARA, also known as Sergio Jara, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-373-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sergio OrtegaJara raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Traveling From Another Country

Last Modified: 

Print

Travelers entering the United States must declare all agricultural and wildlife

products to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials. They will determine

whether your products can enter the country after checking to make sure they meet

entry requirements and do not harbor harmful foreign pests or diseases. We

recommend that you keep receipts and original packaging for agricultural products

as proof of their country of origin.

Know What You CAN and CANNOT Bring into the

United States

If there is something special you want to bring with you from another country, you’ll

need to plan ahead. Get specific guidance by choosing from the types of items

below.

As long as you declare all agricultural products to U.S. Customs and Border

Protection officials, you will not face any penalties—even if an inspector

determines that the items cannot enter the country.
What Do You Want To Bring into the United

States?

Meat, Poultry, and Seafood 

Fruits and Vegetables 

Plants, Plant Parts, Cut Flowers, and Seeds 

Coffee, Tea, Honey, Nuts, and Spices 

Soil, Peat, Sand, Clay, Rocks, and Stones 
Dairy and Egg Products 

Souvenirs 

Musical Instruments 

Pets 

Need Help?
Traveling to Hawai’i for the Festival of the Pacific Arts and Culture

(FestPAC) with a costume or cultural item made from plant or animal

material? FestPAC attendees with agricultural imports should contact the APHIS

Honolulu Plant Inspection Station at 1-808-834-3240 or email:

honolulu.pis@usda.gov for details on how to import these materials legally. Plan

early. Paperwork may be required.

Plants and Plant Products

Plants and plant products can include fruits, vegetables, plant parts, seeds, soil, and

souvenirs made from wood or plants. If you have questions about whether a

particular plant or plant product can be brought into the United States, contact

USDA’s Plant Import Information.

For general questions:

Plant Permits Team

Email: plantproducts.permits@usda.gov

Phone: 877-770-5990

Animal Products

Animal products can include meat, milk, dairy, and eggs. If you have questions

about whether a particular animal product can be brought into the United States,

contact USDA’s Animal Product Import and Export unit.

For general requests:

Animal Product Import and Export Team

Email: apie@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-3300

Note:
Email is preferred.

Traveling From Another Country Contacts
#### Miller v. Bell

19595

10/31/96

Affirmed
Exhibit
32.8
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
 AMEREN
ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 of Ameren Energy Generating Company (the “Company”) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-K"), I, Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 9, 2005
  ****/s/ Warner L.
  BaxterWarner L. BaxterExecutive Vice President
      andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
  Officer)
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Bring a Pet Rabbit into the United

States

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS Veterinary Services does not have any animal health requirements related to

bringing (importing) a pet rabbit into the United States from a foreign country. See

below to view other requirements for bringing pet rabbits into the United States from

another country.
U.S. State and Territory Requirements

Domestic movement requirements are set by the receiving State or Territory.

Visit the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture to find your

destination's agriculture department and check its website for requirements.

For questions or clarification on any of the requirements, contact the State or

Territorial veterinarian's office.