alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAMELA BARRIER, As Guardian of the Person and Property of CHAD A. 

BARRIER,

Appellant,

v.

JFK MEDICAL CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a JFK 

MEDICAL CENTER, PALM BEACH EMERGENCY MEDICAL 

ASSOCIATES, P.L., A Limited Liability Corporation, JASON SEVALD, 

M.D., ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., A Florida 

Corporation, TANYA BEAUMONT, L.P.N., SHARA DAVIS, L.P.N., 

PATRICIA SALMON, L.P.N., GARRY J. BEAUZILE, M.D., and PIERRE 

DORSAINVIL, M.D.,

Appellees.

No. 4D14-560

[November 12, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jack S. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502012CA022822XXXXMB.

Howard S. Grossman of Grossman Attorneys At Law, Boca Raton, and 

Joel S. Perwin of Joel S. Perwin, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Jedidiah Vander Klok, Mark Hicks and Dinah Stein of Hicks, Porter, 

Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, for appellee JFK Medical Center Limited 

Partnership, d/b/a JFK Medical Center.

Elizabeth K. Russo of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, and Jami L. 

Gursky of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Fort Lauderdale for appellees 

Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Tanya Beaumont, L.P.N., Shara 

Davis, L.P.N., Patricia Salmon, L.P.N., Garry J. Beauzile, M.D., and Pierre 

Dorsainvil, M.D.

PER CURIAM.

In light of our reversal of the summary judgment in Barrier v. JFK 

Medical Center Ltd. Partnership, 169 So. 3d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) 

(case no. 4D13-3041), we reverse the January 27, 2014 final judgment 
2

awarding costs against plaintiff, Pamela Barrier, as guardian of the 

person and property of Chad A. Barrier, and remand for further 

proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

CIKLIN, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50994

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDY THOMAS SCHUMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:03-CR-99-2

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Andy Schuman has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Schuman has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50994 Document: 00515471549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
No. 19-50994

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-50994 Document: 00515471549 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2020
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 18

March 19, 1999

AMTROL Inc.
1400 Division Road
West Warwick, RI 02893

Re: Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 1998.

Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

As of October 4, 1998, the Company changed from the last-in-first-out (LIFO)
method of accounting for inventory to the first-in-first-out (FIFO) method.
According to the management of the Company, this change will result in a better
measurement of operating results. In addition, the FIFO method is the more
commonly used method among the other companies serving the markets in which the
Company operates.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Arthur Andersen LLP
CHAPTER 11.1.**INFECTION WITH ABALONE HERPESVIRUS**

[...]

Article 11.1.1.

For the purposes of the *Aquatic Code*, infection with abalone herpesvirus (AbHV) means *infection*with the *pathogenic agent* Haliotid herpesvirus 1 (HaHV-1), of the Genus *Aurivirus* and Family*Malacoherpesviridae*. ~~herpesvirus known to cause~~*~~disease~~*~~in abalone.~~

Information on methods for *diagnosis*is provided in the *Aquatic Manual*.

Article 11.1.2.

**Scope**

The recommendations in this chapter apply to the following species that meet the criteria for listing as susceptible in accordance with Chapter 1.5.:blacklip abalone (*Haliotis rubra),*greenlip abalone (*Haliotis laevigata)*, hybrids of greenlip x blacklip abalone (*Haliotis laevigata*x *Haliotis rubra) and*small abalone (*Haliotis diversicolor).**~~Haliotis diversicolor~~*~~(subspecies *aquatilis* and *supertexta*), *Haliotis laevegata*, *Haliotis rubra* and hybrids of *Haliotis laevegata* x *Haliotis rubra*. These recommendations also apply to any other~~*~~susceptible species~~*~~referred to in the~~*~~Aquatic Manual~~*~~when traded internationally.~~

[...]

___________________________
893 P.2d 201

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Kamaka

15851

2/15/95

Vacated and Remanded
19113

#### Weinstein v. Board of Appeals, Planning Com’n, County of Hawai'i

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 332 

Recognizing the immeasurable contributions of fathers in the healthy development of children, supporting responsible fatherhood, and encouraging 

greater involvement of fathers in the lives of their children, especially 

on Father’s Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, and Mr. CARSON of Indiana) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the immeasurable contributions of fathers in 

the healthy development of children, supporting responsible fatherhood, and encouraging greater involvement 

of fathers in the lives of their children, especially on 

Father’s Day. 

Whereas fathers factor significantly in the lives of children; 

Whereas fathers play an important role in teaching their children life lessons and preparing them to succeed in school 

and in life; 

Whereas children with involved fathers are more likely to do 

well in school, have a better sense of well-being, and have 

fewer behavioral problems; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 332 IH 

Whereas supportive fathers promote the positive physical, social, emotional, moral, and mental development of children; 

Whereas promoting responsible fatherhood can help increase 

the chances that children will grow up with two caring 

parents; 

Whereas, when fathers are actively involved in the upbringing 

of children, the children demonstrate greater self-control 

and a greater ability to take initiative; 

Whereas responsible fatherhood can help reduce child poverty; 

Whereas responsible fatherhood strengthens families and 

communities; and 

Whereas Father’s Day is the third Sunday in June: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the millions of fathers who serve 

3 as a wonderful, caring parent for their children; 

4 (2) calls on fathers across the United States to 

5 use Father’s Day to reconnect and rededicate them6 selves to their children’s lives, to spend Father’s Day 

7 with their children, and to express their love and 

8 support for their children; 

9 (3) urges men to understand the level of re10 sponsibility fathering a child requires, especially in 

11 the encouragement of the mental, moral, social, aca12 demic, emotional, physical, and spiritual develop13 ment of children; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 332 IH 

1 (4) encourages active involvement of fathers in 

2 the rearing and development of their children, in3 cluding the devotion of time, energy, and resources. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Swine: Influenza A Virus Surveillance

State Animal Health Official

Reporting Dashboard Quick Guide

Last Modified: 

Print

USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) surveys for influenza A

virus in swine (IAV-S). The IAV-S dashboard provides State animal health officials

with APHIS’ surveillance data. APHIS uses this data to monitor the genetic evolution

of endemic influenza A virus, make influenza A virus isolates available for research,

develop diagnostic tools, and detect all influenza A viruses.

View Dashboard (Existing Users Only)

Request Access (State Animal Health Officials Only)

Overview

The dashboard includes two graphics. The first shows changes in the success rate of

virus isolation over fiscal years, including the associated dates for major changes in

the IAV-S surveillance program. A description of each change can be found on the

right-hand side of the dashboard.
The second graphic filters the same information by virus subtype, specimen type,

and age class. It provides more detailed information on the effectiveness of the IAVS surveillance program using different methods or targeting different groups.
Need Help?

If you have trouble accessing the dashboard or viewing the data it contains, contact

vs.data.services@usda.gov.

Please direct questions about dashboard content to the animal health point of

contact listed in the dashboard.
December 18, 2003

25462

#### Jas. W. Glover, Ltd. v. Derrick Concrete Cutting & Const., Ltd.

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 23 – CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-130798, 333-142415, 333-155602 and 333-157179 of First Financial Service Corporation of our report, dated March 31, 2011, except for Notes 2,5,6,14,15,16,19,22,23 as to which the date is May 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of First Financial Service Corporation, which report appears in this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Financial Service Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.





Crowe Horwath LLP





Louisville, Kentucky


May 11, 2011
21906

#### Sands of Kahana Vacation Club v. County of Maui

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
National Arbor Day Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Dawn Redwood

Year
    1985

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds 
Memorial Tree

*Metasequoia glyptostroboides*
(Dawn Redwood)

National Arbor Day

Sponsored by 
Senator Mark O. Hatfield

April 26, 1985 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Joel P. Moskowitz, Chief Executive Officer of
Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2006



/s/ JOEL P. MOSKOWITZJoel P. MoskowitzChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 23.1





              Consent of Ernst and Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-63109) pertaining to the RSI Holdings, Inc. Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72101) pertaining to the
RSI Holdings, Inc. Stock Option Plan of our report dated October 13, 1998 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of RSI Holdings, Inc. for the
year ended August 31, 1998 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the
year ended August 31, 1999.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Greenville, South Carolina
November 19, 1999
July 21, 1998

20770

#### State v. Ake

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

APHIS Revises the Regulations for

the Movement of Plant Pests and

Biocontrol Agents

Last Modified: 

Print

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service (APHIS) facilitates the import and interstate movement of live insects,

microorganisms and weeds that are plant pests and/or may be potential biological

control organisms via permits that prescribe safeguards to prevent harm to U.S.

agricultural and environmental resources.  

APHIS revised the regulations that govern the movement of plant pests to align

regulations with current policies, remove obsolete requirements, streamline the

permit process for low risk organisms, and update requirements for the import of

foreign soil.  The proposed rule was published on Friday, January 20, 2017. The final

rule was published on Tuesday, June 25, 2019 and went into effect on Friday, August

9, 2019.  

Final Rule

Effective August 9, 2019, the following listed organisms may be moved interstate

within the United States without further restriction. 
Native and Naturalized Plant Pests Permitted by

Regulation

Beginning Friday, August 9, 2019, the following plant pest are permitted by

regulation (individual permits not required) for interstate movement within the

United States. The table is categorized by bacteria, cockroaches (feeder insect

trade), fungi, insects, mites, nematodes, and viruses.

Loading...

Invertebrate Organisms for the Biological Control

of Weeds

Beginning Friday, August 9, 2019, permits for these organisms are no longer

required for the contiguous United States for domestically collected species. Permits

are still required for importations or interstate movement of foreign isolates.

Loading...

Invertebrate Organisms for the Biological Control

of Invertebrate Plant Pest 

Beginning Friday, August 9, 2019, permits for these organisms are no longer

required for the contiguous United States for domestically collected species. Permits

are still required for importations or interstate movement of foreign isolates.

Loading...

The rule creates a transparent petition process to request a plant pest or a biological

control organism be exempt from permitting requirements. It also defines the
process by which stakeholders can request the reinstatement of permitting

requirements by removing a species from the list of organisms allowed for

interstate/domestic movement. 

The rule will benefit stakeholders by making permit requirements more clear and

transparent. It will also make the permitting process faster and simpler for certain

low-risk pests and pathogens.

For questions about permits for regulated organisms and soil:

Pest Permits Team

Email: pest.permits@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-2285

Alt-Phone: 866-524-5421
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
Exhibit 10.2


 


GANNETT CO., INC.





2015 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN





RULES FOR PRE-2005 DEFERRALS


 


Amendment No. 2 


 


Effective as of July
31, 2018, Gannett Co., Inc. hereby amends the Gannett Co., Inc. 2015 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, Rules for Pre-2005
Deferrals, as follows:


 


		1.	Section 2.6(b) is amended by deleting the last four sentences
of such section and replacing them with the following:



 


			Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, effective July 31, 2018, the TEGNA Inc. and
                                                                           Cars.com Inc. stock funds shall be eliminated as investment options under the Plan.



 


		2.	Section 2.8 is amended by deleting the last four sentences
of such Section.



 


		3.	Section 2.9(h) is amended by deleting the last two sentences
of such Section.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Gannett Co., Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of July 27, 2018.


 





	 	GANNETT CO., INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	      /s/ Dave Harmon
	 	Name: Dave Harmon
	 	Title:   Chief People Officer
Honorable 

S 

AUSTXN ~~.TExAs 

July 16, 1965 

Clarence L. Darter opinion NO. C- 465 

. County Attorney 

Chlldress County 

Childress, Texas 

Re: Whether a county may 

legally acquire, mainDear Mr. 

YOU 

tion: 

tarn and operate a 

translator system In 

order to provide television for entertainment and educational 

purposes for the citlzens of the county, if 

the qualified voters 

of the county petition 

the Commissioners' 

Court to call an election for a bond Issue 

and special tax levy 

for the purpose of 

securing, malntainlng and operating 

the said translator 

Darter: system. 

have requested an opinion on the following ques- 

"May a county legally acquire, maintain and 

operate a translator system Morder to provide 

televls;on for entertainment and educational purposes for the citizens of the county, If the 

qualified voters of the county petition the Commissioners' Court to call an election for a bond 

Issue and special tax levy for the purpose of 

securing, maintaining and operating the said translator system?" 

The Commissioners1 Court Is a court of limited jurlsdiction and can only exercise such powers as are authorized 

by the Constitution and Statutes of this State. Tex.Const., 

Art. V, Sec. 18; Bland v. Orr, 90 Tex. 492, 39 S.W. 558 

(1897); El Paso County v. Elam, 106 S.W.2d 393 (Tex.Civ.App. 

1937); Landman v. State, 97 S.W.2d 264 (Tex.Civ.App. 1936, 

error ref.). 

-2219- 
Honorable Clarence L. Darter, Page 2 (c-465 ) 

There is neither Constitutional nor statutory authority for a county to acquire, maintain and operate a 

television translator system. 

There is neither constitutional nor statutory authority for a Commissioners' Court to issue bonds for the 

purpose of securing, maintaining and operating a television translator system. 

------- SUMMARY 

A county has no authority to acquire, maintain and operate a television translator system. 

The Commissioners' Court has no authority to issue 

bonds for the purpose of securing, maintaining and 

operating a television translator system. 

Yours very truly, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

RBJ:nr 

APPROVED: 

OPINION CGMMIl'TER 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Dean Arrington 

J. Phillip Crawford 

John Pettlt 

Roger Tyler 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: T. B. Wright 

-2220-