alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,459
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,983
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,791
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,068
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,700
<LOANS>                                        380,437
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 496,561
<DEPOSITS>                                     354,118
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,775
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,521
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 196,561
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,443
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,333
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,776
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,379
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,279
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,497
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  69
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,132
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.92
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,614
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,872
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      147
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,926
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,926
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: August 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 159)]
[Notices]               
[Page 51061]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18au10-100]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2010-0035]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 10-01A Long Term Transaction Questionnaire, EIB 10-
01B Oil and Gas Company Questionnaire.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission 
is to create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through 
direct loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credit. The 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117) (``the 
Act''), enacted December 16, 2009, provides for Ex-Im Bank's FY2010 
budget authorization. As part of the U.S. government's efforts to 
strengthen sanctions against Iran, the Act contains language 
prohibiting Ex-Im Bank from:

    Authoriz[ing] any new guarantee, insurance, or extension of 
credit for any project controlled by an energy producer or refiner 
that continues to: (A) provide Iran with significant refined 
petroleum resources; (B) materially contribute to Iran's capability 
to import refined petroleum resources; or (C) allow Iran to maintain 
or expand, in any material respect, its domestic production of 
refined petroleum resources, including any assistance in refinery 
construction, modernization, or repair.

    See Sec. 7043 of the Act.
    The Act is effectively immediately and applies to all 
authorizations Ex-Im Bank may make with FY2010 funds.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before October 18, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Faisal Siddiqui, Export-Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW. Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 10-01A Long Term Transaction 
Questionnaire,
    EIB 10-01B Oil and Gas Company Questionnaire.
    OMB Number: 3048-0030.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This is a new collection to ensure compliance with 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), enacted 
December 16, 2009.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-20389 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
EX-10.44



 Exhibit 10.44 
  

							
	



	 		 		  	 2225 W. Wacker Drive, Suite 3000
 Chicago, IL
60606
 cushmanwakefield.com


 11 December 2017 
 Mr. Matthew Bouw 

Chicago, IL 6061 
 Dear Matthew, 

This letter confirms and supersedes the relocation and repatriation benefits attached in the letter dated 23 March 2014, which relates to your
transfer to Chicago with DTZ Global, Inc. As discussed and agreed, you are entitled to the following relocation and repatriation benefits effective 1 December 2017, being your start date as Chief Executive Officer, Asia Pacific effective
1 December 2017.  
  

	 	●	 	 Relocation of household goods and personal effects from Chicago to Melbourne at reasonable cost up to a 40-foot freight container and 100kg of air freight (including insurance) 



	 	●	 	 One-way business class flights from Chicago to Melbourne for employee and family




	 	●	 	 Resettlement allowance of 1 month’s annual salary 



	 	●	 	 Reimbursement for cancellation of residential lease in Chicago. Noted that existing lease expires on 28 February
2018 



	 	●	 	 Rental reimbursement for 3 months in Melbourne 



	 	●	 	 Cost of external tax advice regarding the transition from US tax jurisdiction to Australian tax jurisdiction




	 	●	 	 Reimbursement for hire car costs in Melbourne for up to, and not exceeding, one week 



Separation
 If the relocating employee leaves
within 18 months of the date of relocation, you will be required to reimburse the company costs of the relations subject to the following parameters: 
  

			
	Time frame	  	Entitlement
	0 –12 months	  	All costs
	12-18 months	  	50%
	>18 months	  	0%

 Sincerely, 
 /s/ John
Forrester     
 John Forrester     

Global President 
 cc:     File 

Accepted and Agreed: 
  
  

					
	 /s/ Matthew Bouw
	  		  	 19-4-2018

	Matthew Bouw	  		  	
	Chief Executive Officer, Asia Pacific	  		  	Date
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                    AMENDMENT NUMBER ELEVEN TO LOAN AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT to the Loan Agreement entered into as of October 4,
1993, between ARI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. ("ARI") and WITECH CORPORATION
("WITECH") as amended (the "Loan Agreement") is dated January 21, 1998.

                                   BACKGROUND

         This Amendment to the Loan Agreement reflects the mutual understanding
and agreement of the parties to amend the Loan Agreement regarding the provision
by WITECH of a revolving credit facility to ARI.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1. The amount stated in Paragraph 2.2 of the Loan Agreement shall be
changed to One Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,200,000).

         2. In Exhibit 1.1 to the Agreement, in the definition of "Termination
Date" and in the Revolving Credit Note, the references to December 31, 1997 are
hereby deleted and December 31, 1998 is substituted therefor.

         3. In Exhibit 1.1 to the Agreement, in the definition of "Total Loan
Commitment," the reference to "Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000)" is deleted and
"One Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,200,000)" is substituted therefor.

         4. In Exhibit 2.2(a), the reference to "Two Million Dollars
($2,000,000)" is deleted and "One Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars
($1,200,000)" is substituted therefor.

         5. In consideration of the agreements by WITECH reflected in this
Amendment Number Eleven, ARI hereby grants WITECH a warrant (the "January 1998
Warrant") for the purchase of twenty five thousand (25,000) shares as reflected
in Exhibit A attached hereto.

         6. Subject to the amendment described herein, the Loan Agreement and
associated documents and agreements remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and delivered by their respective officers as of the date first
above written.

WITECH CORPORATION



By:                                   ARI NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
   ----------------------------
Francis Brzezinski, President         By:
                                         ------------------------ 
                                         Brian E. Dearing, Chairman, President
                                         and Chief Executive Officer
#### Brith Trumpeldor of America, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Bermil Sales & Service Co., Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 19, 1959.

*207
      *Benjamin Eerdes*and *Marcus Schwartz*for appellant.

*Martin B. Klein*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The finding in favor of plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim was against the weight of the credible evidence.

The judgment should be modified to the extent of reversing the award in favor of plaintiff on the counterclaim, and judgment directed in favor of defendant thereon, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.
May 28, 2002

24267

#### Ng v. Miki

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY  1                                                              STATE OF INCORPORATION
---------------------                                                              ----------------------
<S>                                                                              <C>
Tri-Co. Foods Corp.                                                                     Pennsylvania

Spring Glen Fresh Foods, Inc.                                                           Pennsylvania

Consumers Packing Corporation                                                           Pennsylvania
     d/b/a Hanover Foods - Lancaster Division
Hanover Insurance Corporation Ltd                                                   Grand Cayman, B.W.I.
Nittany Corporation                                                                       Delaware
                                                                                         Pennsylvania
NOTE:  Tri-Co. Foods Corporation has two wholly-owned subsidiaries:

Alimentos Congelados Monte Bello S.A.                                              Republic of Guatemala

Sunwise Corporation                                                                       Florida

1:  100% owned by Parent
</TABLE>


                                      -31-
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Edward James SMYTHE, Appellant.

No. 10331.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 2, 1951.

Decided Jan. 25, 1951.

Writ of Certiorari Denied March 26,1951,

See 71 S.Ct. 569.

Edward James Smythe, pro se.

Alfred E. Modarelli, U. S. Atty. and Charles J. Tyne, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Smythe, who filed a brief *in propria persona,*has appealed from an order of the ¡court below refusing to dis*508miss the indictment on the ground that it was improperly found by the grand jury. The order appealed from is not a final one or appealable under either Section 1291 or Section 1292, Title 28 United States Code Annotated. Consequently, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 1 0

- 00 079

- CR

______________________________

LARRY SHAWN MYERS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23413

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Mo rriss2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Larry Shawn Myers has filed a pro se notice of appeal from his conviction for indecency

with a child by contact. On our review of the clerk’s record, we noted that the trial court’s

certification of right of appeal stated that this was a plea agreement case and that Myers has no

right of appeal.

Unless a certification, showing t hat a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we

must dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows Myers has no right of appeal,

and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v.

State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: May 5, 2010

Date Decided: May 6, 2010

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 23.1


        Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Financial Federal Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements
(Nos. 333-1240, 33-32519 and 333-50962) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-56651
and 333-116806) on Form S-3 of Financial Federal Corporation of our report
dated September 24, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Financial Federal Corporation and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2004 and
2003, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended July 31, 2004, which report is incuded in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Financial Federal Corporation for the year
ended July 31, 2004.



/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
October 14, 2004


                                       41
November 28, 1997

18498

#### Doe, In Interest of

Affirmed
#### State v. Stant

17343

3/13/95

Affirmed
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50771

Summary Calendar

MICHELLE R. GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(W-96-CV-475)

April 3, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michelle Griffin sued her former employer, Landmark

Construction Corporation, in a state district court asserting that

she was wrongfully terminated from her employment in violation of

the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. The case was removed
g:\opin\97-50771.opn 2

from the state district court to the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas on diversity of citizenship. In

federal court, Landmark filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the

grounds that Griffin had failed to raise a genuine issue of fact as

to sexual discrimination being the reason for her termination. The

district court concluded that the summary judgment evidence

established that Landmark terminated Griffin for legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons and there was no summary judgment evidence

that these reasons were pretextual. Accordingly, the district

court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment and entered a Final

Judgment dismissing Griffin’s claims. 

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons set forth by the district court in its Order filed

under date of August 28, 1997, we have determined that the Final

Judgment entered under date of August 28, 1997, should be, and it

is hereby, AFFIRMED.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 403 

Recognizing the campaign of genocide against the Kurdish people in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the campaign of genocide against the Kurdish 

people in Iraq. 

Whereas Saddam Hussein’s campaign of genocide against 

Iraq’s Kurdish community began in the 1960s and that 

4,500 Kurdish villages were destroyed between 1976 and 

1988; 

Whereas the campaign of genocide against Iraq’s Kurdish 

community included the deportation and disappearances 

of Faily Kurds in the 1970s and 1980s, the murder of 

8,000 Kurdish men and boys from the Barzani tribe in 

1983, the use of chemical weapons in the late 1980s in 

the Anfal operation and notably at Halabja; 

Whereas during the Anfal campaign of genocide in 1987 to 

1988 almost 200,000 Kurds perished or disappeared, 

families were torn apart; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 403 IH 

Whereas this year marks the 27th anniversary of the attacks 

on Halabja and other Kurdish towns when Iraqi planes 

used poison gas to kill thousands of Iraqi Kurds in gross 

violation of the international conventions against the use 

of chemical weapons; 

Whereas, on September 9, 1988, the United States Senate 

passed the Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988 calling for 

sanctions against Iraq after the use of chemical weapons 

on the Kurds; 

Whereas the Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988 acknowledged that ‘‘the Iraqi army has undertaken a campaign 

to depopulate the Kurdish regions of Iraq by destroying 

all Kurdish villages in large part of northern Iraq and by 

killing the civilian populations (Section 2, subsection 3). 

Iraq’s campaign against the Kurdish people appears to 

constitute an act of genocide (Section 2, subsection 7)’’; 

Whereas, on February 28, 2013, the British Parliament 

passed a resolution recognizing the Kurdish genocide; 

and 

Whereas recognition by the United States Government of the 

campaign of genocide against the Iraqi Kurds will send 

to the world a message of support for international conventions and human rights: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and deplores the campaign of 

3 genocide against the Kurdish people in Iraq; 

4 (2) calls on the United States Government to 

5 recognize the campaign of genocide committed 

6 against the Kurdish people in Iraq; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 403 IH 

1 (3) urges international organizations to do the 

2 same; and 

3 (4) reaffirms its commitment to the friendship 

4 between the United States and the Kurdish people 

5 in Iraq. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
89 P.3d 535

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

May 7, 2004

24806

#### First Ins. Co. of Hawaii, Ltd. v. Jou

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.2

                       Section 906 Certification
               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Financial Federal Corporation for the year ended July 31, 2003, the
undersigned officer, being the Chief Financial Officer of Financial
Federal Corporation, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31,
     2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
     for the year ended July 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Financial Federal Corporation.

     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K.


October 24, 2003
----------------
Date
                              /s/ Steven F. Groth
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
                              President


                                 44
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 351 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 351

    Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding 
                          hydroelectric power.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2015

    Ms. Herrera Beutler (for herself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. 
   Newhouse, Mr. Reichert, and Mrs. McMorris Rodgers) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding 
                          hydroelectric power.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
hydroelectric power is the most abundant source of clean, renewable 
energy in the United States and should be fully utilized in the 
Nation's pursuit of energy independence and affordable energy for all 
people of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE MINOR 

JUDICIARY EDUCATION BOARD

:

:

:

:

No. 428

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2018, Carolyn S. Bengel, Esquire, 

Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor Judiciary Education 

Board for a term ending July 1, 2021.
28707

#### State v. Smith

Reversed