alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                 COMPUSA INC.
                                        
                      COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED             TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
                                              -----------------------------     -----------------------------
                                              DECEMBER 27,     DECEMBER 28,     DECEMBER 27,     DECEMBER 28,
                                                  1997             1996             1997             1996
                                              ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------
<S>                                            <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Common shares outstanding at beginning of 
 period...................................         91,853           90,403           91,447           89,837
Weighted average number of common shares                                                                    
 issued during the period.................            180              385              399              604
Weighted average treasury shares                                                                            
 purchased during the period..............           (628)              --             (314)              --
                                              ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------
Weighted common shares....................         91,405           90,788           91,532           90,441
Incremental shares related to assumed                                                                       
 exercise of stock options................          4,103            3,949            3,979            4,197 
                                              ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------
Weighted common and common equivalent                                                                
 shares...................................         95,508           94,737           95,511           94,638
                                              ============     ============     ============     ============
Net income................................     $   34,067       $   23,728       $   57,526       $   38,274
                                              ============     ============     ============     ============
Basic earnings per share..................     $     0.37       $     0.26       $     0.63       $     0.42
                                              ============     ============     ============     ============
Diluted earnings per share................     $     0.36       $     0.25       $     0.60       $     0.40
                                              ============     ============     ============     ============
</TABLE>
10.26. 2016

Contact CVB Program and Information Management and Security 

(PIMS) at: CVB.PIMS@aphis.usda.gov

When it’s broke, we fix it!

As you’ve been using the NCAH Portal more and more, we’ve been keeping track of issues that come up. On the 

evening of Wednesday, the 26th, the NCAH Portal will be taken down for maintenance as we deploy an updated version 

that has fixes for those issues. 

Helpful Tips for using the 

Portal—Archiving your 

documents

You Asked, We Answered

What we’re working on for future issues...

Vol. 1 ISSUE 3

NCAH PORTAL news for CVB

Changes included in this version are:

 There was a bug where, if a user edited a draft 2049 form after attaching documents to it, they then got an error 

message when trying to submit the item to the CVB. This bug has been fixed.

 Users can specify whether they want authorization to use remaining inventories of replaced labels. There was a 

bug where a Yes request changed to No on the portal screen when the CVB response was returned. The bug was 

cosmetic because the CVB processed the submission with the correct request information, but it was potentially 

confusing to the portal user. This bug has been fixed.

 It was reported that that the doses were required for a 2008 when entered for a firm disposition of "other - file for 

information” - this was fixed so that doses are not required in this instance

 Symbols are no longer allowed in the FFM serial number field for 2008s so in the new version you will notice that 

File for Information 2008s submitted will not require doses and 2008s for serials that contain FFMs, the FFM serial 

number field will no longer allow symbols.

Visit the NCAH Portal Guidance webpage for informational User Guides and videos. 

Check out these user guides that were updated this week:

User Guide #3 - How to Use Account Details 

User Guide #9 - General Guide for E-Submission of General Correspondence to CVB-Inspection and Compliance

User Guide #10 - General Guide for E-Submissions to CVB-Policy, Evaluation and Licensing
#### Istvan GARDOS a/k/a Steven Garrick, a/k/a Sir William Barrick, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 149, Docket 28230.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1963.

Decided Nov. 13, 1963.

*180Wilfred L. Davis, New York City, for petitioner.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, for respondent. Roy Babitt, Special Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.

Before SWAN, CLARK and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This petition to review an order of deportation was taken on submission without argument. It presents questions of law which are controlled by congressional legislation and decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. All the facts are admitted. The petitioner was born in Hungary. He came to Canada and became a Canadian citizen in 1955. The following year he was convicted in Canada of illegally possessing marihuana. When he was admitted to the United States, in 1959, the Canadian conviction was not a ground for exclusion or deportation, but in 1960 the statute was amended to authorize deportation of an alien “who at any time has been convicted of a violation of * * * any law or regulation relating to the illicit possession of or traffic in narcotic drugs *or marihuana.”*[Italics added.] 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a) (11), as amended 74 Stat. 505, § 9 (1960). That this was to be effective retroactively was decided in Mulcahey v. Cattalonette, 353 U.S. 692, 77 S.Ct. 1025, 1 L.Ed.2d 121. That such retroactive application does not violate the *ex post facto*prohibition of Article 1, section 9 of the Constitution has long been recognized, since the *ex post facto*prohibition is limited to crimes, and deportation is a civil proceeding. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 72 S.Ct. 512, 96 L.Ed. 586; Marcello v. Bonds, 349 U.S. 302, 75 S.Ct. 757, 99 L.Ed. 1107.

Order of deportation affirmed.
ANIMAL CARE AID

Questions? Email us at CenterforAnimalWelfare@usda.gov 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Animal Care • AC-18-008

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Issued October 2018 • Reviewed February 2024

Environmental Enrichment for Bears

This Animal Care Aid is part of a series developed to provide information about bear health and care.

Refer to the other topics covered in the series for more information on bear care.

PRACTICAL TIP

Varying what 

kinds of enrichment 

you offer and when 

you offer it helps keep 

the bear’s interest. 

Creating a calendar with 

a variety of enrichment 

opportunities scheduled 

each day is one way to 

achieve this goal. 

DID YOU KNOW?

A stereotypic behavior 

is one that is done 

repeatedly without any 

obvious goal or purpose. 

These behaviors may 

indicate that your bears 

do not have enough 

mental or physical 

stimulation to keep 

them busy throughout 

the day. 

Bears are very active in the wild, often spending most of their day 

looking for food. Enrichment helps create environments for captive 

bears that encourage them to be 

active and offer mental stimulation. 

IDEAS FOR BEAR ENRICHMENT

l Food enrichment

– Favorite healthy foods frozen into blocks of ice

– Honey or other food items hidden in logs

or puzzles

– Spreading food items throughout the enclosure

and on surfaces that require standing and

stretching to access

l Applying different scents (e.g., perfume, spices, 

other animal odors) to surfaces in the enclosure

l Rewards-based training

l Toys such as large plastic barrels, sturdy bear-proof

balls, used paper feed sacks filled with hay or food

items, traffic cones, or food hidden in cardboard boxes

l Logs

l Occasionally rearranging or adding new furnishings

l Housing compatible bears together

Offering your bears a variety of enrichment 

options, both in how you feed them and support 

their behavioral needs, helps keep them active and healthy.

WHY BEARS NEED ENRICHMENT

Designing bear enclosures to support basic behavioral 

needs like digging, swimming, climbing, and denning 

is important. But this is not always enough to keep 

captive bears busy. They do best when they also have 

opportunities that encourage them to problem-solve, 

search for food items, and explore their enclosure.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Carroll A. Wallace, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this 10-K Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated:  March 31, 2004

/s/  CARROLL A. WALLACE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JAMES ANDREW DOLL

PETITION OF: STEVE RICE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 285 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### State v. Evans

19241

4/4/97

Affirmed
1

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities

Federal Advisory Committee

February 23-24, 2009

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC Hotel

1330 Maryland Ave SW

Washington, DC 20024

Telephone: 202-554-8588

AGENDA

Monday, February 23, 2009

8:00 am REGISTRATION (Hotel)

8:30 Call to Order and Opening Remarks

 Jim Moseley, Chair, FRRCC

 Sally Shaver, Acting Counselor to the Administrator for 

Agricultural Policy, US EPA

 Rafael DeLeon, Director, Office of Cooperative Environmental

Management, US EPA

8:45 Discussion: US EPA’s Lifecycle Analysis

 Paul Argyropoulos, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of 

Transportation & Air Quality, US EPA’s Office of Air and 

Radiation

 Vincent Camobreco, Environmental Protection Specialist, 

Office of Transportation & Air Quality, US EPA’s Office of Air 

and Radiation

10:00 MORNING BREAK

10:15 Panel Discussion: Reactive Nitrogen 

 Thomas Theis, Co-Chair, US EPA Science Advisory Board’s 

Integrated Nitrogen Committee (45 minutes)

 Joseph Piotrowski, Special Assistant to the Director, US EPA’s 

Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds (30 minutes)
2

 Cliff Snyder, Nitrogen Program Director, International Plant 

Nutrition Institute (30 minutes)

12:00 pm BREAK FOR LUNCH

1:15 Administrative Matters: Christopher Ashcraft, Assistant DFO, FRRCC

1:20 Public Comment

1:50 Full Committee Discussion Session: moderated by Jim Moseley, 

Chair, FRRCC

2:20 EPA Updates: Sally Shaver, Acting Counselor to the Administrator for 

Agricultural Policy, US EPA

3:00 AFTERNOON BREAK

3:15 Workgroup Breakout Sessions (EPA programmatic contacts meet

with respective workgroups)

5:45 ADJOURN

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

8:30 Workgroup Breakout Sessions (EPA programmatic contacts meet

with respective workgroups)

10:00 MORNING BREAK

10:15 Call to Order, Plenary Workgroup Presentation Session: moderated 

by Jim Moseley, Chair, FRRCC

 Climate Change Workgroup 

 Livestock Workgroup

 Emerging Issues Workgroup

12:00 pm FRRCC Next Steps: moderated by Jim Moseley, Chair, FRRCC

 Next Committee Meeting (when, where, topics for discussion)

 Workgroup Assignments and Meeting Schedule

 Other Business as Needed

12:30 Public Comment Session 

1:00 ADJOURN
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(A)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, D. Geoffrey Shulman,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 8, 2006                    /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       54
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Harmony Drones UAV Components list.

Air Frame 

DJI S1000

http://www.dji.com/product/spreading-wings-s1000

Configuration: Octocopter

Take Off Weight: 6Kg ~ 11Kg / 13.2lbs ~ 24.25lbs

Aircraft Weight: 4.2Kg / 9.25lbs

Diagonal Width: 1045mm/41.14"

Motors: 8x DJI 4114 400kv

ESC: 40A Integrated

Landing Gear: Retractable

Arms: Carbon Fiber Booms, Foldable

Propellers: 1552 High Performance, Foldable

Plug Types: XT150 Flight Battery, XT60 Electronics
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Manufactured by: DJI

Flight Control System

DJI A2,IOSD Mini on screen display, DJI GPS Puck. LED battery low V warning/Satellite indicator.

DJI GPS Puck. LED battery low V warning/Satellite indicator.
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

GPS Waypoint & Mapping system.

DJI Datalink. Provides real time GPS coordinates and tracking to pilot by way of map.
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

RC Controllers:

2 Fatuba 14 Sg controllers, binded for Pilot & Camera Operator. Communicates RX-TX via DJI 

Lightbridge 2.5GHZ TX for flight control and AVL58 TX 5.8GHZ for Pilot camera.
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Transmitters

DJI Lightbridge 2.4GHZ (Camera Operator View)
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

DJI AVL 58 5.8GHZ (Pilot view)
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Motors

Stator Size 41×14mm. kV 400rpm/V Max Power 500W. ESC 40a integrated
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Props

Foldable Propeller (1552/1552R)

Material High strength performance engineered plastics

Size 15×5.2inch

Batteries
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Foxtech 6s 22,000 mAh Lipo 25c-50c

Gimbal

z-15 Zenmuse

Onboard Camera Equipment:

High DefinitionCanon 5D Mark lll with EF 85mm f/1.2L ll USM lens

CAMERA- http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_5d_mark_iii

LENS- http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_85mm_f_1_2l_ii_usm

Gopro 4 Black

http://shop.gopro.com/hero4/hero4-black/CHDHX-401.html
HARMONY DRONES UAV SPECIFICATION SHEET

Onboard Infrared Camera Equipment

FLIR Tau 2 with 25mm Lens

http://www.flir.com/cores/display/?id=54717

ICI Systems 640x 480 Thermal with 7mm lens.

http://www.infraredcamerasinc.com/infrared-camera-9640.html
# SANTA CLARA POST OFFICE BOX 580 (505) 753-7330 (505) 753-5375 Fax 

### Decemb e r 27,2013

Mr
. Wi lli a m Ho nk e r Water Q u ality Pro tecti o n Div is i o n US E PA Reg ion 6 14 45 Ro ss Avenu e, S ui te 1200 Dalla s, TX 752 0 2-2733 

### 6WQ
. ..



# <t- **.~~**

**·· ·**  **6WQ-D.%-~ ~~**  **···** 6WQ-A

. .... . . ....•. 6WQ-C
.. . . .•. .• ••• . •. 

### 6WQ-E
... ........ . . 

### 6W~P. **Y.f~t\::**

**l.**

**.** 6WQ-S.
.. .... . ..... . ... . ... . ... . . . 

# INDIAN PUEBLO ESPANOLA, NEW MEX I CO 87532 OFFICE OF GOVERNOR

**~ ~**  

# k

**~** ,:Z: I .::. 

# 0'>., ::::t- -1:"' 

## on.J 

# ,_ :bo 7::1"< 

## ::r --,



## - .:::oo .• 0



### ~ **~** 

# · "'
R e: Tribal Certiflcationfor Propos e d 20 13 National Pollutant Disc harge Elimination

**,~ys m**  

### (N PDE S) Ge neral P er

mit for Storm Wat e r Dis char ges from In dus trial Ac ti vi ties 

### Dear Mr. Honker: In re s po n se to you r l e tt e r received Dec e mb e r 18 , 20 13 re ga rd in g the Multi-Sec to r Gen e ra l p e rmit for st orm wa ter d ischa rges fr om indu s tria l ac ti v ity; thi s letter se rves as t he Pueblo of Sa nta C l a ra 's ce ttifi cat io n of sa id p e rmi t fo r di sc harges und e r Pu eb lo ju ri s dicti o n . Th e r e feren ce d di sc h arges w ill co mpl y w it h app li cab l e provi s io n s of Sect ions 208(e), 3 0 I -303 , 3 06 and 307 of th e C l ea n Wat e r Act and th e Sa nta C lara Puebl o Water Q ua l it y Co de, adop ted as a me nd ed by Sa nta C la ra Triba l Co un c il R eso lu t i o n No. 2 003 -27 (Ju l y 1 5, 20 0 3), a nd a pproved by the Sec retary o f th e I nterior effect ive as of A u g u s t 5, 2003. In a dditi o n , the Pueblo r e qu es t s tha t a Not i ce O f Int e nt (NO I) and Notice of Te rmin ation (NOT) b e provid e d to th e Sa n ta C l a ra Pu e b lo Gove rn o r 's O ffi ce at th e s ame t im e i t i s prov ided to the US E n vi r o nm e nt al Pro tect io n Agen cy. A co py of t he Storm wate r P o llu tio n Pr eve nt ion Pl a n mu s t be made avai lab le to th e Pu e b lo o r Sa nta C l ara s t a ff up o n re qu est. T h ank you fo r you r l etter r ega rdin g thi s m atter. If yo u s ho uld ha ve any qu estio n s p l ease d o not h es it ate to co nta ct Berna rdin o C h avarr i a o f th e Sa nta C lara Pu eb lo O rfic e of Env ir o nm e nta l Affai r s at (5 05) 753 -73 26 x 1 239. S in ce r e l

y,



# ~·r **~~** Santa C l at·a Pu e blo Cc: lilc E n viro nm en t a l Development Corpora ti on Ge n e r a l C oun se l
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6046

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUAN PRATT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-95-123-3-MU, CA-97-28-3-MU)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Pratt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Pratt waived the right to

collaterally attack his conviction or sentence except on specified

grounds, and he fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. See Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 (1993).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Pratt, Nos. CR-95-123-3-MU; CA-97-28-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED