alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 542 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 2, 2015. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for further consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 8) to modernize energy infrastructure, build a 

21st century energy and manufacturing workforce, bolster 

America’s energy security and diplomacy, and promote energy 

efficiency and government accountability, and for other purposes. No further general debate shall be in order. In lieu of 

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the 

bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the 

purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of 

Rules Committee Print 114–36. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute 

are waived. No amendment to that amendment in the nature 
2 

•HRES 542 EH 

of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill 

(S. 1177) to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure that every child achieves. All 
3 

•HRES 542 EH 

points of order against the conference report and against its 

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one 

motion to recommit if applicable. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Weaving
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The craft is shown as a family operation, with children carding the wool, a young woman spinning it, and an older woman operating a loom.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2019082EN.01001801.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de commerce de Paris (France) lodged on 24 December 2018 — Trendsetteuse SARL v DCA SARL

(Case C-828/18)

(2019/C 82/19)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Trendsetteuse SARL

Defendant: DCA SARL

Question referred

Should Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 (1) on the status of commercial agents be interpreted as meaning that a self-employed intermediary who is acting as an agent on behalf of and in the name of his principal, but does not have the power to change the prices and contractual conditions of his principal’s sales contracts, does not have the authority to negotiate those contracts for the purposes of that article, and consequently cannot be classified as a commercial agent and benefit from the status provided for in the Directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents (OJ 1986 L 382, p. 17).

---
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Labayog v. Labayog; Estate of Labayog, In re

16096, 16310

10/4/96

Denied

83 Hawai'i 412, 927 P.2d 420
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016104
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                              97
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23248
<ALLOWANCES>                                       715
<INVENTORY>                                      34291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 59500
<PP&E>                                          112046
<DEPRECIATION>                                   49632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  150807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29031
<BONDS>                                          36873
<COMMON>                                          4797
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       68377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    150807
<SALES>                                         351991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                351991
<CGS>                                           320832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   320832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5466)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  33709
<INCOME-TAX>                                     12201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              21508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     21508
<EPS-BASIC>                                     4.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.41


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 125 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 125

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 26, 2015.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 5) to support State and local accountability for public 
education, protect State and local authority, inform parents of the performance 
of their children's schools, and for other purposes. No further general debate 
shall be in order. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the 
bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 114-8, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as 
adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. The bill, as amended, 
shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment 
under the five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. No further amendment to 
the bill, as amended, shall be in order except those printed in part B of the 
report of the Committee on Rules. Each such further amendment shall be 
considered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 
Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable 
for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent, may be withdrawn by its proponent at any time before 
action thereon, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such further amendments are waived. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, as amended, and any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift
Energy Income Partners 1989-B, Ltd's balance sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         368,082
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               552,930
<PP&E>                                         8,252,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,986,792)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,850,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          45,582
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,781,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,850,190
<SALES>                                        886,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               898,995
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  556,298<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                164,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            164,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   164,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense. Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

ERICK MORALES

- GUERRERO,

Appellee. §

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00185

- CR

Appeal from the

394th District Court

of Jeff Davis County, Texas

(TC# CR 1 700847 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the trial

court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress. We therefore reverse the trial court’s

“Order on Motion to Suppress” and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings, in

accordance with the opinion of the Court. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7 TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Order entered January 22 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01466 - CV DAVID LEMON, ET AL. , Appellant s

V. STRAIT CAPITAL COMPA NY, LTD., Appellee On Appeal fr om the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 08245



### O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ January 16, 2019 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to January 30, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Item_4_1_13_Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (Chapter 13.2.) / page 1

Annex 20

CHAPTER 13.2.**INFECTION WITH PATHOGENIC RABBIT LAGOVIRUSES (RABBIT HAEMORRHAGIC DISEASE)**

Article 13.2.1.

General provisions

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) is defined as an *infection* of leporids with *Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus type 1* (RHDV) ~~and~~or *Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus type 2* (RHDV2) (hereafter ‘pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses’).

The following defines the occurrence of *infection* with pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses:

1)antigen or nucleic acid specific to pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses has been detected in a sample from a leporid showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*; or

2)antibodies specific to pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses, which are not the consequence of *vaccination*, have been detected in a sample from a leporid showing clinical signs or pathological lesions consistent with *infection* with pathogenic rabbit lagoviruses, or epidemiologically linked to a confirmed or suspected *case*.

For the purposes of the *Terrestrial Code*, the *infective period* for ~~rabbit haemorrhagic disease (~~RHD~~)~~ shall be 60 days.

Standards for ~~diagnostic tests~~diagnosis and vaccines, as well as information on the epidemiology, are described in the *Terrestrial Manual*.

Article 13.2.2.

Country free from RHD ~~free country~~

A country may be considered free from RHD when it has been demonstrated~~shown~~that no *case* has occurred~~the disease has not been present~~ for at least the past 12 months~~one year~~, that no *vaccination* has been carried out in the past~~previous~~ 12 months, and that virological or serological*surveillance*~~surveys~~ in both domestic and *wild*~~rabbits~~ leporids have confirmed the absence of the*infection*~~disease~~.

This period may be reduced to six months after the last *case*has been destroyed~~eliminated~~ and *disinfection*procedures have been completed in countries adopting a *stamping-out policy*, and where~~the~~ serological*surveillance*~~surveys~~ confirmed that no *case*~~the disease had not~~occurred in the *wild*~~rabbits~~ leporids.

[...]

____________________________

*WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023*

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/September 2023	1
H. Res. 602 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 4, 2016. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Guinta, to rank immediately after Mr. Stutzman; and Mr. Johnson of Ohio. 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Bost. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Purpose of Module for Reporting Form for Potential Regulatory Compliance Incidents:**  This module provides an example template of a form for potential regulatory compliance incidents that your organization might use as part of your organization’s quality management practices relevant to APHIS regulations found at 7 CFR Part 340. 

**Biotechnology Quality Management Support:**  APHIS Biotechnology Regulatory Services has developed this module as one of a series of modules. Biotechnology Quality Management Support is useful for any organization that wishes to develop or improve quality management practices related to the APHIS regulations cited above. 

**Approach:**  The module includes a template (below) that your organization can customize specific to your needs and operational practices for reporting potential regulatory compliance incidents involving regulated GE organisms.  Each section of the template has examples of what might be included in a standardized form for reporting a potential regulatory compliance incident.  The template is not a standard, but should be considered as a tool to modify to meet your organization’s needs.  

The example template is found on the APHIS BRS website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/bqms.  Note that the template text in blue font serves as a prompt for describing your organization’s approach.

**Module:  Reporting Form for Potential Regulatory Compliance Incidents**

**Disclaimer:** This module provides a generalized guide for your organization’s quality practices relevant to your obligations under APHIS regulation found at 7 CFR Part 340.  Use of these modules and its content does not guarantee that the user’s activities are in compliance with 7 CFR part 340, and it does not eliminate the user’s obligations under any other statute or regulation.  If your organization wishes to use formal quality management systems, it is best to rely on qualified quality management professionals.  

Page 2 of 2

# image1.gif
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  November 10, 2004               /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Robert A. Bourne
                                       Title:  President and Treasurer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income  Fund XI, Ltd.  and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL Income  Fund XI,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.