alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARONEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,029,000
<SECURITIES>                                27,925,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,386,000
<PP&E>                                       4,768,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,661,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,125,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,740,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,364,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,125,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,900,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,991,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,991,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,991,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)


</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KUNXIN HE, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 11-71431 Agency No. A098-451-313
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 9, 2013 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. Kunxin He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have 

# FILED
MAR 13 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS1 Because the parties are familiar withthe facts and procedural history underlying this appeal, we do not recount them here. 11-71431 2 jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 & n.1 (1992). We deny the petition for review. 1 He contends that he suffered past pe rsecution because his church in China was illegal and officials raided his churchand arrested the preacher, who was He’s father. The record does not compel the conclusion that He suffered past persecution based on these experiences. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1017- 18, 1019-21 (9th Cir. 2006); Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1014-18 (9th Cir. 2003). Substantial evidence also supports th e agency’s finding that He failed to demonstrate he had a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Gu, 454 F.3d at 1021-22; Molina–Estrada v. INS , 293 F.3d 1089, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2002). Because He failed to establish his eligib ility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the higher standard of eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (109)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,939
<PP&E>                                         140,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                (46,289)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,792
<SALES>                                         26,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,242
<CGS>                                           11,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    129
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 54
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (42)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

APHIS Issues Regulatory Status

Review Responses

Print

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service (APHIS) recently reviewed the following plants modified using genetic

engineering to determine whether they posed an increased plant pest risk as

relative to non-modified comparators: 

Yield10 Bioscience, two camelinas modified for improved seed oil quality.

Bayer Crop Science, canola modified for herbicide resistance.

Nuseed, canola and brown mustard modified for improved product quality and

herbicide resistance.

Hjelle Advisors, soybean modified for altered product quality.
Michigan State University, potato modified for fungal resistance (potato late

blight).

University of Wisconsin, hemp modified for reduced levels of

tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). 

APHIS found these modified plants were unlikely to pose an increased plant pest risk

compared to other cultivated plants. As a result, they are not subject to regulation

under 7 CFR part 340. From a plant pest risk perspective, these modified plants may

be safely grown and bred in the United States. 

You can view these RSR requests and APHIS’ responses on the APHIS website.
June 20, 2016

To Whom it May Concern,

Holy City Aerial Photos, LLC has proudly been issued an exemption, Regulatory Docket No FAA

– 2015

– 4146 and exemption numbered 13819 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial inspections of residential and commercial real estate properties. Holy City Aerial Photos, LLC hereby respectfully requests an amendment to the exemption to allow (operate) all approved UAS’ listed on the “Approved Unmanned Aircraf

t Systems (UAS) Make/Model under Section 333” list located under Docket FAA

- 2007

- 3330

. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

Please feel free to contact the undersigned should you have any questi on or concerns concerning this request for an amendme nt to the Exemption.

Sincerely,

Joshua Fugle Holy City Aerial Photos, LLC 3067 Sugarberry Ln Johns Island, SC 29455 843

- 209

- 8695
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 10, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00215

- CR

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS , EX. REL. TODD A. D URDEN, COUNTY ATTORN EY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patr icia O. Alvarez , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

On April 8, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the

opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent (the Honorable Spencer Whitewood

Brown), the Honorable James T. “Tully” Shahan, and any other real part y in interest may file a

response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than April 25, 2019

. Any

such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Cour t

1 This proceeding arises out The State of Texas v. Mark Anthony Gonzalez ; Cause No. 10041CR; and twenty

- one

other cases , pending in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas . T he Honorable Spencer W. Brown signed the

order at issue in this proceeding.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 24, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants ; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Region 7 , EPA SUBJECT: July

14, 2014 , Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** Karl Brooks and Ward Burns of EPA gave a summary presentation on July 14 , 2014 , to the Utilities State Government Organization (USGO) . The majority of the presentation centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 . **ATTENDEES** EPA Region 7: Karl Brooks Ward Burns Other Attendees included members of Utilities State Government Organization attendee list not available.
#### Tavakoli v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'n

25828

07/25/2005

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          15,324
<SECURITIES>                                    31,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                      468
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,362
<PP&E>                                           3,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,220
<SALES>                                            526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   526
<CGS>                                               89
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   95,951
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0
<PP&E>                                                   70,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                           45,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          120,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,419,827
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  5,083
<OTHER-SE>                                           (3,303,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            120,919
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        441,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      119,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (560,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (560,557)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0



</TABLE>
H. Res. 577 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 5, 2016. 

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate 

that a quorum of the House is present and that the House 

is ready to proceed with business. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Integrated Plant Health Information

System

Last Modified: 

Print

The USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS) Integrated Plant

Health Information System (IPHIS) is a Web-based application that provides a single,

standardized, and comprehensive data management system capable of supporting

activities associated with domestic or emergency pest programs.  

The system provides an environment and processes for gathering quality

information from all core functions of APHIS’ Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)

(survey, regulatory, diagnostics, and control) in a timely or “real-time” manner to

make information available to key regulatory partners and stakeholders. 

The information contained within the IPHIS application serves as an electronic

interface providing USDA users with access and ability to take action on compliance

agreements, regulatory actions, and sample diagnostics.  The IPHIS application

allows USDA users to enter and view data for plant health events nationwide.

PPQ’s current vision is to utilize IPHIS as the point of entry for all emergency and

domestic program related agricultural activities.   IPHIS new mobile data collection

tool will be an important part of this vision by providing an easier way for surveyors

to collect their data and upload it faster to IPHIS.  
Access IPHIS 

(For State and Federal cooperators only)

IPHIS Resources 

IPHIS Support

USDA Marketing & Regulatory Program (MRP) IT Technical Assistance Center

Email: help@usda.gov

Phone: 877-944-8457

When contacting the MRP Help Desk via phone or email, be sure to specify that your

issue is IPHIS-related so that it can be properly routed.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Senate Librarian Leona Faust Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    American Elm

Year
    2023

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Ulmus Americana 'Jefferson'*
(Jefferson American Elm)

Sponsored by
Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer and
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell

To Honor
The Life and Service
of Senate Librarian Leona Faust

Planted on May 15, 2023
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    Photo of plaque.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          Photo of plaque. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 606 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 606

  Expressing support for designation of February 4, 2016, as National 
                         Cancer Prevention Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2016

  Mr. Israel (for himself, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Speier, Mr. 
  Nolan, Mr. Levin, Mr. Dent, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Lee, Mr. Rangel, Ms. 
 Bordallo, Mrs. Dingell, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Connolly, 
 Mr. Cooper, Mr. Cicilline, and Mr. McGovern) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of February 4, 2016, as National 
                         Cancer Prevention Day.

Whereas National Cancer Prevention Day is a day to remind us that when looking 
        at cancer we need to look at prevention and reducing risks for human 
        health and the environment;
Whereas when we work to prevent cancer risks, it impacts human health, the 
        environment, and the economy;
Whereas cancer is one of the leading causes of death around the world and has 
        touched the lives of nearly everyone, either directly or indirectly;
Whereas the disease is the cause of nearly 1 out of every 4 deaths in the United 
        States;
Whereas by the end of 2016, approximately 1,685,210 new cases are expected to be 
        diagnosed across the United States;
Whereas more than 1,600 cancer-related deaths per day are expected throughout 
        the year for a total of approximately 595,690; and
Whereas February 4, 2016, would be an appropriate date to designate as Cancer 
        Prevention Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of National Cancer Prevention 
        Day;
            (2) recognizes all efforts to raise awareness for the 
        reduction of cancer risks; and
            (3) recognizes the devastating effect cancer has on 
        families and wishes to expand knowledge, encourage early 
        detection, and work with friends in the medical and scientific 
        fields to put an end to this deadly disease.
                                 <all>
```